Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout07 July 12, 2017 CommissionCOMM-COMM-00070 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 'METING AGENDA TIIVE/DATE: 9:30 a.m / 1Nednesday, July 12, 2017 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside CONMSSIONERS Chair —John F. Tavaglione Vice Chair — Dana Reed Second Vice Chair— Chuck Washington Kevin Jeffries, County of Riverside, District 1 John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside, District 2 Chuck Washington, County of Riverside, District 3 V. Manuel Perez, County of Riverside, District 4 Marion Ashley, County of Riverside, District 5 Deborah Franklin / Art Welch, City of Banning Lloyd White / Nancy Carroll, City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck / Tim Wade, City of Blythe Jim Hyatt / Jeff Hewitt, City of Calimesa Dawn Haggerty / Jordan Ehrenkranz, City of Canyon Lake Greg Pettis / Shelley Kaplan, City of Cathedral City Steven Hemandez / To Be Appointed, City of Coachella Karen Spiegel / Randy Fox, City of Corona Scott Matas / Russell Betts, City of Desert Hot Springs Adam Rush / aint Lorimore, City of Eastvale Linda Krupa / Michael Peraful, City of Hemet Dana Reed / To Be Appointed, City of Indian Wells Michael Wilson / Glenn Miller, City of Indio Brian Berkson / Veme Lauritzen, City of Jurupa Valley Robert Radi / Kathleen Fitzpatrick, City of La Quinta Bob Magee / Natasha Johnson, City of Lake Elsinore Neil Winter / John Denver, City of Menifee Victoria Baca / To Be Appointed, City of Moreno Valley Rick Gibbs / Jonathan Ingram City of Murrieta Berwin Hanna / Ted Hoffman, City of Norco Jan Hamik / Susan Marie Weber, City of Palm Desert Ginny Foat / Geoffrey Kors, City of Palm Springs Michael M. Vargas / Rita Rogers, City of Penis Ted Weill / Charles Townsend, City of Rancho Mirage Rusty Bailey/ Andy IVelendrez, City of Riverside Andrew Kotyuk / Scott IVlller, City of San Jacinto Michael S. Naggar / Matt Rahn, City of Temecula Ben Benoit / Timothy Walker, City of Wfldomar John Bulinski, Governor's Appointee Caltrans District 8 Comments are welcomed by the Coirrnission. If you wish to provide comments to the Conrrission, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the perk of the Board. Riverskie County Transpodation Commission TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board DATE: July 5, 2017 SUBJECT: Possible Conflicts of Interest — Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda of July 12, 2017 The July 12, 2017 agenda of the Riverside County Transportation Commission includes items that may raise possible conflicts of interest. A Commissioner may not participate in any discussion or action concerning a contract or amendment if a campaign contribution of more than $250 is received in the past 12 months or 3 months following the conclusion from any entity or individual listed. Agenda Item No. 7K — Agreement for Freeway Service Patrol Tow Truck Service Consultant(s): Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. Manny Acosta, Treasurer 2000 W. Key Street Colton, CA 92324 Tara B e rl From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Importance: Tara Byerly Thursday, July 06, 2017 7:15 AM Tara Byerly Jennifer Harmon; STANDIFO; Anne Mayer RCTC: July Commission Agenda - 07.12.2017 High Good morning Commissioners: The July Agenda for the Commission meeting scheduled for Wednesday, July 12, 2017 @ 9:30 a.m. is available. Please copy the link: http://rctcdev.info/uploadVmedia itemstjuly-commission-agenda-july-12-2017.original.pdf Fji F Fi:i F • Conflict of Conflict of Interest Form.pdf Interest Memo.p.,. Also, attached for your review and information is the conflict of interest memo and form. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Respectfully, Riverside County Transportation Commission Tara Byerly Deputy Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission PO Box 12008, Riverside, CA 92502-2208 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 787-7141 1 rctc.org i Tara Bverl From: Tara Byerly Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2017 7:17 AM To: Tara Byerly Subject: RCTC: July Commission Agenda - 07.12.2017 Importance: High Good morning Commission Alternates: The July Agenda for the Commission meeting scheduled for Wednesday, July 12, 2017 @ 9:30 a.m. is available. Please copy the link: http://rctcdev.info/uploads/media items/July-commission-agenda-July-12-2017.original.pdf Respectfully, Riverside County Transportation Commission Tara Byerly Deputy Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission PO Box 12008, Riverside, CA 92502-2208 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 787-7141 I rctc.org 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONER SIGN -IN SHEET DULY 12, 2017 NAME EMAIL ADDRESS z(/‘/--" e‘'5' 1 �AGENCY , vff.,e---- • 7 Z-Z42--y.b���"7y��,��'/'I� ao �//�� 1r„'"�. �F/""�"_ � 11 �p�l-U thAco IboeR�iW NA- 04/,`cm BC(Jcs A..) n'Jrv.n9 6/-4 //e/ .--, J, , ff-iv,94-r• tii,-"re,2,e,44 C G / 17 4,-.sr" fit )2--- P--.. -,_--- rit Yli #1/21r— Coli, t frtg5/1- '-c-/°cA—/ _ TA- C/e�n/,� e57fryi "..e.....-- Yn M4,-,�! / cr�(�,. ...erik A r,Fj ..'l �iW//41,t4 c/fl.. 01 r-1iet arAL.U.i.0 ettW6ta--0)Z, q`&thisA5c.11) I `�i.Q C,E1��/�I�It: i-L�7L�Vrila� �1 GCJ e--pliOL R.e-QA.- ' „„\..t\)&\A-Ni (lie \\S' ./Ivoc,7<. 787-Af67---e)4 vce -/,:-•5 7.,ey/,,,/ ✓ C7;9,s isovlo /7,-, z_ vvvvvi_.__-_-f} rz j ✓c c ,�,s7 .� kItgliavo atil n -,.,',,4,-; ,p. .-) _.,(da bc,:,,,____ K,,.. A/4-7z. 4,/v7--4,(2_ �(('Q, �'� �d ��/1'/�f,E /4/6;// L ,Gt 6/,446,,fs- do'v.,_„--x,,e_is e e;/J.; d / re i-J2 St-KI40\1-1K. DL6E-R-T- , Ali - z(1,1 W,)5bi- 1-,-),0 �}PN'Q�. NeAryukvidtv Co lq,(/ttzaGL Gii1/4KN' �`� � S Ilx-Cevtid‘j h ' $74# • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ROLL CALL DULY 12, 2017 County of Riverside, District I County of Riverside, District II County of Riverside, District III County of Riverside, District IV County of Riverside, District V City of Banning City of Beaumont City of Blythe City of Calimesa City of Canyon Lake City of Cathedral City City of Coachella City of Corona City of Desert Hot Springs City of Eastvale City of Hemet City of Indian Wells City of Indio City of Jurupa Valley City of La Quinta City of Lake Elsinore City of Menifee City of Moreno Valley City of M u rrieta City of Norco City of Palm Desert City of Palm Springs City of Perris City of Rancho Mirage City of Riverside City of San Jacinto City of Temecula City of Wildomar Governor's Appointee, Caltrans District 8 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:30 a.m. Wednesday, July, 12 2017 BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, CA In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting at the Commission office, 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor, Riverside, CA, and on the Commission's website, www.rctc.org. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Government Code Section 54954.2, and the Federal Transit Administration Title VI, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141 if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, including accessibility and translation services. Assistance is provided free of charge. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting time will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide assistance at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS — Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3) continuous minutes or less. The Commission may, either at the direction of the Chair or by majority vote of the Commission, waive this three -minute time limitation. Depending on the number of items on the Agenda and the number of speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion, reduce the time of each speaker to two (2) continuous minutes. In addition, the maximum time for public comment for any individual item or topic is thirty (30) minutes. Also, the Commission may terminate public comments if such comments become repetitious. Speakers may not yield their time to others without the consent of the Chair. Any written documents to be distributed or presented to the Commission shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. This policy applies to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items. Under the Brown Act, the Commission should not take action on or discuss matters raised during public comment portion of the agenda that are not listed on the agenda. Commission members may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 12, 2017 Page 2 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — JANUARY 26 — 27 AND JUNE 14, 2017 5. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS — The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 6. PUBLIC HEARING — RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSIT SERVICES FUNDING ALLOCATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 1 1) Conduct a public hearing at its July Commission meeting on the proposed Section 5307 Program of Projects (POP); 2) Approve the Fiscal Year 2017/18 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5307 and 5311 POP for Riverside County; 3) Approve the FY 2017/18 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) fund allocations for transit; 4) Direct staff to add projects into the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP); and 5) Adopt Resolution No. 17-012, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate State Transit Assistance Funds". 7. CONSENT CALENDAR —All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 7A. STATE INCURRED COST AUDIT Page 21 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the May 2017 Riverside County Transportation Commission Incurred Cost Audit performed by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 12, 2017 Page 3 78. FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT AND MEASURE A AUDIT RESULTS Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Transportation Development Act (TDA) and Measure A audit results report for Fiscal Year 2015/16. Page 51 7C. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE REQUEST FOR RIGHT OF WAY FUNDING FOR TEMESCAL CANYON ROAD WIDENING PROJECT Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 60 1) Approve programming $5 million of Measure A Regional Arterial (MARA) funds for the county of Riverside's Temescal Canyon Road widening project; 2) Approve Agreement No. 17-72-109-00 between the Commission and the county of Riverside programming $5 million of MARA for the right of way phase for the Temescal Canyon Road widening project; and 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement. 7D. 2018 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT Page 65 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Intracounty Formula percentage distribution among the three geographic areas in Riverside County (Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley) based on taxable sales per the STIP Intracounty Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for purposes of preparing the Commission's 2018 STIP submittal as follows: • Western County 77.30 percent • Coachella Valley 22.11 percent • Palo Verde Valley 00.59 percent. 7E. CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM CYCLE 3 — ADDITIONAL FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES UPDATE Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the update on Active Transportation Program (ATP) Funding Opportunities Cycle 3. Page 69 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 12, 2017 Page 4 7F. FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 71 1) Approve the Fiscal Year 2017/18 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program funding recommendations in the amount of $3,599,364; 2) Direct staff to prepare memorandums of understanding (MOUs) with the project sponsors to outline the project schedule and local funding commitments; and 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. 7G. 2017 STATE ROUTE 91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 76 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the 2017 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. 7H. STATE ROUTES 71/91 INTERCHANGE — CITY OF CORONA UTILITY AGREEMENT Page115 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 17-31-108-00 with the city of Corona (Corona) for utility relocation related to the State Routes 71/91 interchange in the revised amount of $855,961, plus a revised contingency amount of $102,939, for a revised total amount not to exceed $958,900; 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required for these services; and 4) Approve an increase of $428,900 in FY 2017/18 budgeted federal revenues and right of way expenditures for utility relocation costs. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 12, 2017 Page 5 71. CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH HAL HAYS CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR RIVERSIDE - DOWNTOWN COMMUTER RAIL STATION IMPROVEMENTS Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page123 1) Award Agreement No. 17-33-073-00 to Hal Hays Construction, Inc. (Hal Hays), as the lowest responsible, responsive bidder, for the construction of the Riverside -Downtown Commuter Rail Station improvements project (Project) in the amount of $1,063,230, plus a contingency amount of $212,646, for a total amount not to exceed $1,275,876; 2) Find the Braughton Construction, Inc. (Braughton) bid non -responsive for failure to meet the Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) goal or Good Faith Efforts (GFE) requirements related to the federal funding on the Project; 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required by the Project. 7J. VIDEO SURVEILLANCE STORAGE AND CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION EQUIPMENT Page134 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Authorize the procurement of video surveillance storage equipment and related closed circuit television (CCTV) equipment through the use of the California Multiple Award Schedules (CMAS) pursuant to the Public Contract Code Section 10299(a) and the Commission's Procurement Policy Manual in the amount of $1.2 million; and 2) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute purchase orders awarded under the terms of the agreements. 7K. AGREEMENT FOR FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL TOW TRUCK SERVICE Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page136 1) Award Agreement No. 17-45-061-00 to Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. for Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) tow truck services on Interstate 215 Beat Nos. 18 and 19 for a three-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in the amount of $3,302,812, plus a contingency amount of $165,141, for a total amount not to exceed $3,467,953; Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 12, 2017 Page 6 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required for these services. 7L. FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 MEASURE A COMMUTER ASSISTANCE BUSPOOL SUBSIDY FUNDING CONTINUATION REQUESTS Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 166 1) Authorize payment of $1,645/month maximum subsidy per buspool for the period July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, to the existing Riverside and Riverside II buspools; and 2) Require subsidy recipients to meet monthly buspool reporting requirements as supporting documentation to receive payments. 7M. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH RIVERSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT Page 171 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 17-33-117-00 with the city of Riverside Police Department (RPD) to provide aerial surveillance and support to the Commission -owned rail stations and right of way in the amount not to exceed $244,637; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 8. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt the following bill position: a) AB 1282 (Mullin) — Support; and 2) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation. Page 187 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda July 12, 2017 Page 7 9. FISCAL YEARS 2017/18 — 2021/22 MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR THE LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS PROGRAM Page 192 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the Fiscal Years 2017/18 — 2021/22 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Local Streets and Roads (LSR) as submitted by the participating agencies. 10. RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Riverside County Public Transportation: Annual Countywide Performance Report (Countywide Report) for Fiscal Year 2015/16. Page 195 11. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 12. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Commission activities. 13. ADJOURNMENT The next meeting of the Commission is scheduled to be held on Wednesday, September 13, 2017, Board Room, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. AGENDA ITEM 3 PUBLIC COMMENT 340p dlZ JW3 ✓�cS��✓r./1(tiJ ura ../ tiadivro anoao / Nouvziniv9110 / A3v ao awvN eviWki 14 tea Z 3403 dIZ JLLI� J33lLLS of .�-L s' .[ S /V/ :'ON 3N0HdSMV/ 5;,;-?74�b� � ��7"3/(ij rON 3NOHd ..54.‘"gu/tifo; ?a,/ tai-voi2,«1-czuC;/�'��' � L: e09 :91N3wwo3 anana ao wrens 133H1S :W311 VaN39V do 133rans GLIVAS 3111 do 3111313 3111 01 moans aNV H3V1301 =SSMIGOV SS3N1Sn8 :ONI1N3S3E1d31:1 ;SS3Haall :31INVN (VON3J113H1 No ausn sv) rON 1A1311 vaN39v =S1N3ININO3 onend �1 )133H3 Jackson Tidus A LAW CORPORATION July 10, 2017 Direct Dial: Email: Reply to: File No. 949.851.7409 mstaples@ jacksontidus.l aw Irvine Office 7161 / 124975 VIA EMAIL (District2 @ rivco.org; iharmon @ rctc.org) and U.S. Mail John F. Tavaglione, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502 ATTENTION: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Re: July 12, 2017 Commission Meeting, Agenda Item Nos. 3 (Public Comments) — Request for Expedited Acquisition of Ward Irrevocable Trust Property for SR 79 Realignment Project Right -of -Way Dear Chairman Tavaglione and Honorable Commissioners: On April 4, 2017, we submitted a letter to the on behalf of our client, the Ward Irrevocable Trust ("Ward"), requesting expedited acquisition of the Ward property for the State Route 79 Realignment Project: Domenigoni Parkway to Gilman Springs Road ("Realignment Project"). A copy of our April 4 letter is attached, and includes an exhibit showing the location of the Ward property at the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Newport Road and background information justifying the expedited acquisition of the Ward property for the Realignment Project. Thank you for the opportunity to meet with RCTC's Right of Way Manager, Mark Lancaster, and attorneys, Ken MacVey and Steve DeBaun, on May 24 in response to our April 4 letter. During the meeting, we discussed that the approved alignment for the Realignment Project starts at the Ward property, and Mr. Lancaster confirmed that the Ward property is needed for the Realignment Project. We received the attached letter dated June 13 from RCTC's attorneys, saying that RCTC has not yet procured funding to purchase the Ward property for the Realignment Project. However, before we participated in the May 24 meeting, we were already aware that ROTC has not allocated funds to purchase the Ward property and other right-of-way properties outright. So, at the meeting, we offered to negotiate alternative terms along the lines of an option or other mechanism that would enable RCTC to make a down payment and annual payments to acquire the Ward property over time, and to reimburse Ward for property taxes (and other carrying costs) during the acquisition period until the full purchase price is paid. Our proposal is not unlike the process approved to acquire private property for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan ("MSHCP") when funding to purchase property is not immediately available. (see, MSHCP pp. 6-11, 6-17 — 6-18). Irvine Office 2030 Main Street, 12th Floor Irvine, California 92614 t 949.752.8585 f 949.752.0597 Westlake Village Office 2815 Townsgate Road, Suite 200 Westlake Village, California 91361 t 805.230.0023 f 805.230.0087 www.jacksontidus.law 1361651.2 Riverside County Transportation Commission John Tavaglione, Chair Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board July 10, 2017 Page 2 The June 13 letter from RCTC's attorneys neglected to respond to our request to negotiate payment teams rather than a lump sum purchase. We ask that RCTC, at its September meeting, consider our request to negotiate a down payment and annual payments and authorize RCTC to negotiate payment terms to acquire the Ward property as a priority acquisition for the Realignment Project. Ms. Ward remains willing and eager to discuss the terms of an option or other arrangement for RCTC to acquire her property for the Realignment Project as part of an amicable resolution of this matter. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional inform.ation. Sincerely, Michele A. Staples MAS:laj Attachments: 1) April 4, 2017 letter from Ward's attorneys to RCTC 2) June 13, 2017 letter from RCTC's attorneys to Ward's attorneys cc: John Bulinski, Director, Caltrans District 8* Anne Mayer, RCTC Executive Director* Olivia Balderrama, Aide to Riverside County Supervisor Washington* Juan C. Perez, Director of Transportation, County of Riverside* Patricia Romo, Deputy Director of Transportation, County of Riverside* Jeanne E. Scherer, Chief Counsel, Caltrans* Gregory P. Priamos, County Counsel, County of Riverside* Synthia Gunzel, Deputy County Counsel, County of Riverside* Steven DeBaun, Counsel, Riverside County Transportation Commission* * Via email, with attachments 1361651.2 ATTACHMENT 1 Jackson Tidus A LAW CORPORATION April 4, 2017 Direct Dial: Email: Reply to: File No: 949.851.7409 mstaples(i)jacksontidus.law Irvine Office 7161 / 124975 VIA EMAIL (Distriet2Ariveo.orgk ameyerArete.org) and U.S. MAIL John F. Tavaglione, Chair Anne Mayer, Executive Director Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 31'd Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502 Re: Request for Expedited Acquisition of Ward Irrevocable Trust Property for SR 79 Realignment Project Right -of -Way Mr. Tavaglione and Ms. Mayer: Jackson Tidus represents Zeny Ward, Trustee of the Ward Irrevocable Trust ("Ward"). Ward owns the real property at 33280 East NeArport Road in Winchester, California, at the northeast corner of State Route 79 and Newpod Road known as ON 465-190-030, the site of the Winchester Swap Meet (the "Ward Property"). The Ward Property is at the southern end of the State Route 79 Realignment Project: Domenigoni Parkway to Gilman Springs Road ("Realignment Project"). Attachment 1 to this letter shows the location of the Ward Property in relation to the Project. The Ward Property is among the land described as right-of-way land necessary for implementation of the Project. Because almost a1I of the prop6sed alignments considered during the Project's long public planning process pass through the Ward Property, Ms. Ward, vvho is over 80 years of age, has spoken with Riverside County officials on several occasions in an effort to anange for the timely purchase of the Ward Property for the Realignment Project. Ms. Ward was told that purchasing the Ward Property had to wait until after the Realignment Project's alignment was selected and the environmental impact report was certified because of a previous mistake purchasing other property for the Realignment Project's right-of-way before the proposed alignments were changed making that property unnecessary after all. The Ward Property is located where the State Route 79 realignment begins, making it a key property for the Realignment Project. For many years, the County's on-line GIS system has included a "Special Note" for the Ward Property notifying the public that the property is in the proposed State Route 79 Realignment Con idor, and including the name and phone number of a County staff person to contact to discuss the matter. Excerpts of tb.e current GIS printout for the Ward Property are attached as Attachment 2 to this letter. Because of this acquisition -cloud over the Ward Property, Ms. Ward lost a $13.6 million sale of the property in 2006 after the Irvine Office 2030 Main Street, 12th Floor Irvine, California 92614 t 949.752.8585 f 949.752.0597 Westlake Village Office 2815 Townsgate Road, Suite 200 Westlake Village, California 91361 t 805.230.0023 f 805,230.0087 www 00*(01(10,18w 1342324.10 John F. Tavaglione, Chair Anne Mayer, Executive Director April 4, 2017 Page 2 purchaser spoke with the County's staff person. Ms. Ward's efforts to sell the property at its fair market value since that time have been unsuccessful. More recently, the Ward Property was impacted by plans for the State Route 79 Road Widening Project ("Road Widening Project"). Although the County timely acquired other properties near the Ward Property that were needed for the Road Widening Project, the County changed the Road Widening Project adjacent to the Ward Property and enlarged a drainage culvert at the Ward Property boundary without notice, without compensation. and without including any measures to protect the Ward Property and Swap Meet business from flood damage. Ms. Ward was cast into the position of spending significant time, money and other resources after -file -fact to secure repairs to the Ward Property, modifications to the culvert and installation of additional facilities needed to help protect the Ward Property from damage. Ms. Ward was willing to amicably resolve the Road Widening Project matter even though the protective facilities are inadequate and unsightly in part because of affirmations that the Ward Property would be purchased if needed for the Realignment Project once the Realignment Project's aligmnent was selected and the environmental impact report was certified. The Realignment Project has now been approved as a road alignment that cuts through the heart of the Ward Property. The Realignment Project was approved on December 8, 2016 by Caltrans as the lead agency, and on January 26, 2017 by RCTC as the responsible agency, and the Realignment Project's Final Environmental Impact Report/Enviromnental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation SCH# 2004091040 ("EIR.") has been. certified. Since the project approval, vendors at the Swap Meet have been questioning whether it makes sense to continue their businesses there, or whether they should relocate where their investments may be longer - lived. Therefore, Ms. Ward requests an opportunity to meet with the County, Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC") and California Department of Transportation eCaltrans"; collectively, "Agencies") to make arrangements to expedite acquisition of the Ward Property. The Realignment Project's EIR. and project approvals show that the Ward Property is needed to accomplish the State Route 79 road realignment, The Realignment Project's E1R takes the -position that the Agencies are not- responsible for purchasing the Ward Property or other properties needed for the right-of-way until some undefined future date. Likewise, the ROTC January 26, 2017 staff report recommending approval of the Realignment Project, explains that It}he properties required for the project alignment will not be acquired until funding is identified". Based on Ms. Ward's previous discussions and the ROTC agenda report, we understand that funding is currently available to purchase property needed for the Realignment Project, though ROTC is using it to purchase property other than right-of-way lands. Ms. Ward continues to suffer hardship as the result of the Agencies' continued actions that effectively "reserve" her property for the Realignment Project without timely compensating her or making mutually agreeable arrangements to purchase her land. The Agencies' actions continue to cloud Ms. Ward's title. Accordingly, Ms. Ward requests that the Agencies re - prioritize the acquisition of the Ward Property due to its key location, Ms. Ward's advanced age 1342324.10 John F. Tavaglione, Chair Anne Mayer, Executive Director April 4, 2017 Page 3 and the continued hardship the delay is imposing on her, her landholding and her Swap Meet business. Ms. Ward remains willing and eager to discuss the terms for the Agencies to acquire her property for the Realignment Project, and respectfully requests an opportunity to meet with the Agencies by the end of this month to discuss arrangements for the purchase of the ward Property as part of an amicable resolution of this matter. Please contact one if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, ----27,1-e/A-d-aJatvaze4 Michele A. Staples MAS:Iaj Attachments: 1) Map showing location of the ward Property in relation to the Realignment Project. 2) Current County GIS printout for the ward Property. cc: Mr. John Bulinski, Director, Caltrans District 8 * Olivia Balderrama, Aide to County Supervisor Washington* Juan C. Perez, Director of Transportation, County of Riverside* Patricia Romo, Deputy Director of Transportation, County of Riverside* Jeanne E. Scherer, Chief Counsel, Caltrans* Gregory P. Priamos, County Counsel, County of Riverside* Synthia Gunzel, Deputy County Counsel, County of Riverside* . Steven DeBaun, Counsel, .Riverside County Transportation Commission* * Via email, with attachment 1342324.10 Aerie! Date: February 2011, Aero Grphics, Inc Begin ProjectLimitsr KPH R25.4, (PN'l I R15:?s�r VGALTIPRQ.11RC7C1171146U0161MAPHLEMEIS1BMP_REFINE1g_MB A.hiXD EIMP_RPF1NE1B_M© A.PDF 07/19/2016 LEGEND ` Project Roadway Grade -Separated Interchange (Ramps) ' Local Cross Street Cul-de-Sac Local Road e Cut Line Fill Line Project Impact Area Project Study Area Aqueduct Crossing Bridge over Local Street Bridge over Local Street and Other Feature Bridge over Other Feature Bridge over SR79 County Assessor's Parcelca Best Management Practices .— — (BMPs) 0 600 feet 0 200 Meters 1:9,600 Figure 2.2-5a Newport Road Build Alternative lbr 24-Year Design Horizon Final Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Impact Statement State Route 79 Realignment Project Riverside County Parcel Report APN 465-190-030 DIscialmpr Report Date: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 MAPS/XMAGES No map irnage can be found for this APN No Imagery can be found for this APN PARCEL APN 465-190-030- Supervisorial CHUCK WASHINGTON, DISTRICT 3 2 District 2011 JEFF STONE, DISTRICT 3 Supervisorial District 2001 Previous APN 465190010 Township/Range T5SR2W SEC 34 Address 33280 3 Elevation Range 1,488 - 1,664 NEWPORT RD WINCHESTER, CA 92596 Mailing 2571 YUCCA Thomas Bros. PAGE: 869 GRID: Fl Address RD Map Page/Grid PAGE: 869 GRID: F2 OCEANSIDE PAGE: 869 GRID: G1 CA, CA 92054 PAGE: 869 GRID: G2 Legal Recorded Indian Tribal Not In Tribal Land Description Book/Page: Land pm 30/18 Subdivision Name: PM 8066 Lot/Parcel: 1 Block; Not Available 11-act Number: Not Available Lot Size Recorded lot City Not within a City Boundary size is 34.64 Boundary/Sphere Not within a City Sphere acres Annexation Date: Not Applicable No [AFC° Case * Available Proposals: Not Applicable Property Constructed; March 3oint NOT WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE Characteristcs 1990 Powers Authority MARCH JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY Baths: 4.00 Bedrooms: 3 Central Cool: Central Heat: Const. Type: WOOD FRAME Garage Type: A Prop Area: 1888 SqFt Roof Type: Water District Flood Control District € EOLOGIC Fault Zone Faults Liquefaction Potential Subsidence MISCELLANEOUS School District Communities Lighting (at .. 2010 Census Tract Farmland Sip a+ial N etas EMWD RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT California Water Board Not in a Fault Zone Paleontological Sensitivity Not within a 1/2 mile of a Fault Low Moderate Susceptible HEMET UNIFIED Winchester Zone B, 25.87 Mlles From Mt. Palomar Observatory 042737 LOCAL IMPORTANCE OTHER LANDS PR PQSED STATE ROUTE 7 RE LIi GM NT CORRIDOR, PEAS CONTACT RUSSET WILLIAMS AT951) 95 -2016. PERMITS/ CASES/ADDITIONAL None High Sensitivity (High B) SENSITIVITY EQUIVALENT TO HIGH A, BUT IS BASED ON THE OCCURRENCE OF FOSSILS AT A SPECIFIED DEPTH BELOW THE SURFACE. THE CATEGORY HIGH B INDICATES THAT FOSSILS ARE LIKELY TO BE ENCOUNTERED AT OR BELOW FOUR FEET OF DEPTH, AND MAY BE IMPACTED DURING EXCAVATION BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. Tax Rate Areas 071290 CO FREE LIBRARY CO STRUCTURE FIRE PROTECTION CO WASTE RESOURCE MGMT DIST CSA /46 CSA 152 EMWD FLOOD CONTROL ADMIN FLOOD CONTROL ZN 4 GENERAL GENERAL PURPOSE HEMET UNIFIED SCHOOL MT SAN JACINTO JR COLLEGE MWD EAST 1301999 RIV CO REGICIDAL PARK & OPEN SP RIVERSIDE CO OFC OF EDUCATION SAN JACINTO BASIN RESOURCE CONS SAN JACINTO VALLEY CEMETERY SO. CALIF,JT(19,30,33,36,37,56) VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM HOSP DIST VALLEY WIDE REC & PK ATTACHMENT 2 Indian Wells (760) 568-2811 Irvine (949) 263-2600 Los Angeles (213) 817-8100 Ontario (909) 989-8584 I NW BEST BEST ar KRIEGER � ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3390 University Avenue, 51h Floor, P.O. Box 1028, Riverside, CA 92502 Phone: (951) 686.1450 I Fax: (951) 686-3083 1 www.bbkiaw.com Kendall H. MacVey (951) 826-8226 kendall, rnacvey@bbklaw.com File No. 17336.00500 June 13, 2017 Via Entail cat U.S. Mail Michele Staples, Esq. Jackson Tidus a Law Corporation 2030 Main Street, 12th Floor Irvine, CA 92614 Sacramento (916) 325-4000 San Diego (619) 525-1300 Walnut Creek (925) 977-3300 Washington, DC (202) 785.0600 Re: Request for Acquisition of Ward Irrevocable Trust Property for SR79 Realignment Project Right -of -Way Dear Ms. Staples: We wish to thank you for the opportunity to meet with you and your client, Zeny ward, regarding your client's request for the acquisition by the Riverside County Transportation Commission of the parcel held by the Ward Irrevocable Trust for which she acts as trustee. After careful consideration of the request, ROTC management has decided that R.CTC is not now in a position to commence acquisitions for the realignment project. As you are aware, the project consists of multiple segments with potentially hundreds of acquisitions. Currently, the sequence and timing of construction for these segments has yet to be determined and funding for construction and acquisition has yet to be procured. If there are in any changes in Nis. Ward's circumstances or if there is any additional information you believe we should have, please do not hesitate to provide that information. Sincerely, Kendall H. MacVey el/4) of BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP cc: Steve DeBaun, Esq. Mark Lancaster 17336.00500129857530.1 AGENDA ITEM 4 MINUTES RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES Thursday, January 26, 2017 WELCOME AND WORKSHOP OVERVIEW The Riverside County Transportation Commission Workshop was called to order by Vice Chair Dana Reed at 3:15 p.m., at the Hyatt Palm Springs, 285 North Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, California. Anne Mayer welcomed and thanked the Commissioners for their attendance and provided an overview of the January 26 portion of the workshop. Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent Marion Ashley Rusty Bailey Ben Benoit Brian Berkson John Bulinski Nancy Carroll Joseph DeConinck Ginny Foat* Deborah Franklin Rick Gibbs Dawn Haggerty Berwin Hanna Jim Hyatt Kevin Jeffries Andrew Kotyuk Linda Krupa Bob Magee Scott Matas Greg Pettis Robert Radi Dana Reed Adam Rush Karen Spiegel Michael Vargas Chuck Washington Ted Weill *Arrive after meeting was called to order LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Victoria Baca Jan Harnik Steven Hernandez Michael Naggar John F. Tavaglione Michael Wilson Neil Winter County of Riverside District 4 The Commission's state legislative advocate Mark Watts as well as Cliff Madison and Kathy Ruffalo, the Commission's federal legislative advocates, provided updates on state and federal legislative activities. STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT PROGRESS AND NEXT STEPS Aaron Hake, External Affairs Director, presented an update on the Strategic Assessment and next steps, highlighting the following areas: • Public input received through the transportation workshops and summit as well as a public opinion survey; Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes January 26-27, 2017 Page 2 • The "Sweet Spot" related to finance, public input, and technical aspects; • Strategies; • Technical Analysis; • Progress; • Anticipated funding and the funding gap; • Debt capacity; • Possible new sources of revenue; and • Goals, plans, and opportunities. Anne Mayer then discussed potential state funding, how to fund the capital projects, federal opportunities, prior Commission action regarding a possible ballot initiative, and the need to ensure the Commission has the legal authority to do so. Scott Miller, alternate Commissioner to the city of San Jacinto, discussed the importance of the State Route 79 and Mid County Parkway projects, the need to identify funding, and recommendations to reassess and prioritize these projects. Commissioner Washington expressed support for the staff recommendation. M/S/C (Washington/Radi) to: 1) Receive and file the update on the 2015 Strategic Assessment; 2) Provide any further direction to staff; and 3) Sponsor state legislation to authorize the Commission to impose a sales tax in addition to Measure A, subject to the voters' approval. Abstain: Jeffries Due to technical difficulties, the RCTC 40t" Anniversary video was shown at this time instead of at the dinner. Therefore, the Commission workshop adjourned at 5:05 p.m. The Commission workshop will reconvene Friday, January 27 at 8:30 a.m. MINUTES Friday, January 27, 2017 The second day of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Workshop was called to order by Vice Chair Reed at 8:35 a.m., at the Hyatt Palm Springs, 285 North Palm Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, California. Anne Mayer provided an overview of the January 27 portion of the workshop. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes January 26-27, 2017 Page 3 Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent Marion Ashley Rusty Bailey Ben Benoit* Brian Berkson* John Bulinski Nancy Carroll Joseph DeConinck Ginny Foat Rick Gibbs Dawn Haggerty Berwin Hanna Jan Harnik Jim Hyatt Kevin Jeffries Linda Krupa Bob Magee Scott Matas Scott Miller Dana Reed Adam Rush* Karen Spiegel Michael Vargas Chuck Washington Neil Winter *Arrive after meeting was called to order Victoria Baca Deborah Franklin Steven Hernandez Michael Naggar Greg Pettis Robert Radi John F. Tavaglione Ted Weill Michael Wilson County of Riverside District 4 Steve DeBaun, legal counsel, announced the Closed Session items. CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) Case No. RIC 1505449, RIC 1607468, and 5:16-cv-00133 There were no announcements from closed session items. FUTURE CHANGES IN TRANSPORTATION — A LOOK AT FUTURE TECHNOLOGY Dr. Matthew Barth, Director of the Center for Environmental Research and Technology, presented the future changes in transportation, highlighting the following areas: • Reducing Air Pollution and Energy Impacts; • National Center of Sustainable Transportation; • Center of Advancing Research in Transportation Emissions; • California Air Resources Board; • New transportation trends; • New directions of emission measurements; • New directions in connected vehicles; • Connect vehicle applications; • City of Riverside innovation corridor; • New directions of automated vehicles; and • Vehicle electrification. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes January 26-27, 2017 Page 4 HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANS —A RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUCCESS STORY Tom Kirk, Executive Director of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), presented CVAG's Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), highlighting the following areas: • How the plan works; • How the fee works and its value; • Existing and needed conservation land; • Interstate 10 mitigation bank; and • MSHCP savings. Charles Landry, Executive Director of the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), presented RCA's MSHCP, highlighting the following areas: • RCA's mission; • Western Riverside County circulation element and Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) • What MSHCP provides; • Funding sources; • MSHCP transportation fees; • Acres conserved and funding expended; • Acquisitions; • Covered road improvements; • Covered operation and maintenance activities; and • Successes. CLOSING REMARKS AND ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, the workshop adjourned at 11:16 a.m. Respectfully submitted, ))-)N1"-1-(L—H Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES Wednesday, June 14, 2017 1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL The Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chairman John Tavaglione at 9:33 a.m. in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, California, 92501. Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent Marion Ashley* Victoria Baca Rusty Bailey Ben Benoit Brian Berkson David Bricker Joseph DeConinck Jordan Ehrenkranz Deborah Franklin Rick Gibbs Berwin Hanna Jan Harnik Steven Hernandez Jim Hyatt Kevin Jeffries Andrew Kotyuk Linda Krupa Bob Magee Scott Matas V. Manuel Perez Robert Radi Dana Reed Adam Rush Karen Spiegel John F. Tavaglione Michael Vargas Chuck Washington Ted Weill Lloyd White Michael Wilson Neil Winter Ginny Foat Michael Naggar Greg Pettis *Arrived after the meeting was called to order 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairman Tavaglione led the Commission in a flag salute. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS Tim Lynch, General Outdoor Advertising, expressed his appreciation to the Commission and staff for their professionalism and compassion in working with him through the condemnation process for the relocation of two electronic digital billboards as part of the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 2 Chairman Tavaglione stated he has known Mr. Lynch for 22 years and General Outdoor Advertising is the best company out there. He expressed appreciation to Mr. Lynch for working cooperatively with the Commission. Commissioner Karen Spiegel expressed appreciation to Mr. Lynch for his comments and commended staff. Anne Mayer expressed appreciation to Mr. Lynch for his comments and for his extraordinary generosity posting public service announcements on his billboards. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — May 10, 2017 Commissioner Lloyd White requested a correction to the attendance to reflect his attendance instead of Commissioner Nancy Carroll. M/S/C (Reed/Baca) to approve the May 10, 2017 minutes as corrected. 5. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS There were no additions or revisions to the agenda. 6. PUBLIC HEARING — PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 Chairman Tavaglione announced the continuation of the public hearing opened at the May 10 meeting. Michele Cisneros, Deputy Director of Finance, presented the proposed Fiscal Year 2017/18 Budget and discussed the following areas: • Budget adjustments and summary; • Funding sources and comparison; • Summary of uses; • Management services; • Regional programs; • Toll operations; • Capital project development and delivery expenditures/uses; • Capital projects and operations expenditures and highlights; • Functional uses breakdown; • Measure A management services; and • Next steps. At this time, Chairman Tavaglione asked if there were any comments from the public. No comments were received. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 3 Commissioner Reed commended staff for an excellent presentation and noted the Commission anticipates receiving $176 million of Measure A revenues next fiscal year. Commissioner Reed explained Orange and Riverside Counties are virtually equal in terms of population, yet Orange County, with its half -cent sales tax, expects revenues in excess of $320 million and Riverside County's geography is five times greater. Riverside County is behind with the transportation demands and the Commission needs to do something other than just pass this budget. At this time, Chairman Tavaglione closed the public hearing. M/S/C (Radi/Magee) to: 1) Approve the salary schedule effective July 6, 2017, located in Appendix B of the proposed budget; and 2) Adopt the proposed Budget for FY 2017/18. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR M/S/C (Hanna/Baca) to approve the following Consent Calendar items. Abstain: Jeffries, Agenda Item 7F. 7A. RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE APPENDIX OF THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE Adopt Resolution No. 17-011, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Amending the Appendix of the Conflict of Interest Code Pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974". 7B. APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 Approve Resolution No. 17-010, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Establishing the Annual Appropriations Limit", for Fiscal Year 2017/18. 7C. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 2017. 7D. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2017. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 4 7E. QUARTERLY SALES TAX ANALYSIS Receive and file the sales tax analysis for Quarter 4, 2016 (4Q 2016). 7F. RECURRING CONTRACTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 1) Approve the recurring contracts in an amount not to exceed $12,823,500 for Fiscal Year 2017/18 and $178,100 for FYs 2018/19 — 2021/22; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. 7G. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE 1) Adopt the following bill positions: a) AB 686 (Santiago) — Oppose; b) SB 768 (Allen, Wiener) — Support; c) H.R. 100 (Brownley) — Support; and 2) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation. 7H. AGREEMENT FOR OPERATION LIFESAVER OUTREACH AND MARKETING SERVICES 1) Award Agreement No. 17-15-072-00 to Arellano Associates for the provision of Operation Lifesaver, Inc. (OLI) program outreach and marketing services for a three-year term, and one, two-year option to extend the agreement, in an amount not to exceed $500,000; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement, including option years, on behalf of the Commission. 71. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH BNSF RAILWAY FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AT THE WEST PORPHYRY OVERHEAD 1) Approve Agreement No. 14-31-114-02, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 14-31-114-00, with Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) for extended flagging services related to the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (91 Project) for an additional amount of $500,000, using the remaining contingency of $276,240 related to the BNSF construction and maintenance (C&M) agreements and authorize an additional $223,760, for a total amount not to exceed $7,421,234; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 5 7J. ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR CONSTRUCTION ZONE ENHANCED ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM INCLUDED IN THE STATE FURNISHED MATERIALS CATEGORY FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Authorize an increase in the expenditures for the Construction Zone Enhanced Enforcement Program (COZEEP) under Agreement No. 12-31-070-00 for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (91 Project) for an additional amount of $800,000, using the remaining contingency of $400,000 and authorizing an additional $400,000, for a total not to exceed $5.1 million. 7K. AGREEMENT FOR SAFETY -RELATED SERVICES WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY 1) Approve Agreement No. 17-33-094-00 to Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) to define the roles and responsibilities of each party regarding safety -related services on the San Jacinto Branch Line (SJBL) for a five-year term, in an amount not to exceed $500,000; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute future non -funding related amendments to this agreement. 8. PROPOSED METROLINK BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 Chairman Tavaglione welcomed and introduced Art Leahy, Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) Chief Executive Officer, to present the FY 2017/18 SCRRA Budget. He expressed appreciation for Mr. Leahy's leadership when he was the executive director for the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) related to the 91 Express Lanes. Anne Mayer welcomed Mr. Leahy and discussed the relationship between the Commission and OCTA related to the toll lanes. She then discussed the importance of the Commission's partnership with Metrolink as one of the five -member agencies and invaluable leadership of Mr. Leahy. Art Leahy congratulated the Commission for the great success for the 91 Express Lanes project. Mr. Leahy provided an overview for the FY 2017/18 priorities, highlighting the following areas: • Continued emphasis on safe operations, with the full implementation of positive train control (PTC); • Improved reliability and on -time performance, by putting Tier 4 locomotives into service; • Providing funding necessary for required equipment maintenance; Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 6 • Enhance customer experience, by implementing upgrades to the mobile ticketing application and a modernized ticket vending machine; • Investment in existing assets to maintain a state of good repair, by funding critical rehabilitation project and improving processes to accelerate project delivery; and • Ongoing workforce development. Commissioner Kevin Jeffries stated Metrolink is looking to potentially maintain fares at the same level or reduce them; however, the Commission is being asked for more funding to subsidize fares. He expressed this is a counter intuitive business decision and requested this be addressed during the presentation. Art Leahy replied the FY 2017/18 SCRRA budget is down from previous years. Commissioner Jeffries replied that is with the exception of this member agency. Art Leahy noted the Commission opened the Perris Valley Line (PVL) extension, which increased costs. He stated Mr. Campbell will comment on the details of the budget; however, it is understood there is a partnership with the counties and SCRRA would not do something that does not make financial sense. However, it is appropriate to put issues on the table for discussion and resolution. Mr. Leahy introduced Chief Financial Officer Ronnie Campbell to present the FY 2017/18 SCRRA Budget. At this time Mr. Campbell, presented the FY 2017/18 SCRRA Budget highlighting the following areas: • FY 2017/18 budget priorities; • Revenue allocation by member agency; • FY 2017/18 projected expenditures; • Expense allocation and subsidy by member agency; • FY 2017/18 rehabilitation and new capital budget; and • Timeline and next steps. At this time, Commissioner Marion Ashley joined the meeting. In response to Commissioner Spiegel's question regarding reserves, Mr. Campbell replied there have been discussions about determining the appropriate level of reserves. Commissioner Spiegel expressed concern about the reserves and reducing fares, which do not seem to make financial sense. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 7 Art Leahy replied there is no proposal to reduce fares. He then discussed SCRRA's financial situation when he became the CEO. Commissioner Jeffries expressed appreciation for responding to most of the concerns. He then referred to the staff report regarding Local Transportation Fund rail fund reserves being exhausted within the next four years, and it mentions the potential of fare reduction. Commissioner Jeffries explained in this discussion, SCRRA is stating fares are not going to be reduced while asking the member agencies for an increased subsidy. He then recognized the excellent work Mr. Leahy has done to turn business around for SCRRA. In response to Commissioner Steven Hernandez's question about the price elasticity of demand and its impacts on ridership, Mr. Leahy discussed an experiment on the Antelope Valley Line and possibly applying it to other lines. Commissioner Hernandez suggested being mindful of the costs and look at a limit to subsidize this experiment. Mr. Leahy replied the subject for passenger miles is the lowest for Southern California so there is a good taxpayer purchase. He explained during these experiments, the point is to develop a plan that makes sense from the member agency's prospective, and the passengers' prospective, and keep binding these together in terms of finances. He also noted there has been a significant amount of deferred maintenance over a 20-year period so this is also an issue to consider. Commissioner Hernandez expressed appreciation for Mr. Leahy's comments. Commissioner Andrew Kotyuk expressed appreciation for the presentation and the comments from the Commissioners. He discussed his positive impression since returning as the Commission's Metrolink representative and Chair, including the substantial improvements with positive train control and the partnership with South Coast Air Quality Management District for Tier 4 locomotives. Commissioner Kotyuk stated the Metrolink board placed a priority on cost reduction instead of reserves at this time. Mr. Leahy then discussed the importance of understanding the uniqueness of Southern California and its impact on transit. Chairman Tavaglione expressed appreciation to Art Leahy and Ronnie Campbell for their leadership at SCRRA. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 8 M/S/C (Reed/Kotyuk) to: 1) Receive and file a report on the Commission's portion of the Fiscal Year 2017/18 Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) operating and capital budget; 2) Approve the FY 2017/18 SCRRA operating and capital budget, which results in a total operating and capital subsidy of $21,374,400 from the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director to enter into Memorandum of Understanding No. 17-25-100-00 with SCRRA regarding annual funding. 9. AGREEMENTS FOR ON -CALL GRANT WRITING SERVICES Aaron Hake, External Affairs Director, presented the details for the agreements for the on -call grant writing services. M/S/C (Reed/Radi) to: 1) Award the following agreements to provide on -call grant writing services for a two-year term, and two, two-year options to extend the agreements, in an amount not to exceed an aggregate value of $1.1 million; a) Agreement No. 17-14-067-00 to Blais & Associates, Inc.; b) Agreement No. 17-14-068-00 to HDR Engineering, Inc.; c) Agreement No. 17-14-069-00 to Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.; and d) Agreement No. 17-14-070-00 to WSP USA Inc. 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute task orders awarded to the consultants under the terms of the agreements. Recuse: Spiegel 10. FISCAL YEARS 2017/18 — 2019/20 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS Robert Yates, Multimodal Services Director, presented the FYs 2017/18 — 2019/20 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTP), highlighting the following areas: • Public transit funding process; • Allocation requirements to the public operators; • SRTP process, highlights, and expenditures by sources; Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 9 • SRTP Highlights — a map of the RTA Route 200 and RTA Rapid Link; and • SRTP expenditures by fund source. At this time, Commissioner Washington left the meeting. In response to Commissioner Spiegel's clarification for the RTA Route 200 and the stop in the city of Corona, Robert Yates replied while the Corona Transit Center is shown on that map, the bus is not intended to stop there and apologized for the confusion. M/S/C (Radi/Spiegel) to approve the Fiscal Years 2017/18-2019/20 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTPs) for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and Riverside; Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA); Riverside Transit Agency (RTA); SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine); and the Commission's Commuter Rail Program. At this time, Commissioner Washington rejoined the meeting. 11. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION There were no items pulled from the Consent Calendar. 12. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 12A. Anne Mayer: • Congratulated the Commission and the PVL project team for receiving the Transit Project of the Year award in Sacramento at the annual event sponsored by the California Transportation Foundation. She expressed appreciation to Commissioner Reed and Metrolink Chair Kotyuk for attending; • Announced the court hearing for the Mid County Parkway California Environmental Quality Act case will be held on June 19 with a tentative ruling by June 23; and • Commended Commission staff for another excellent budget. 13. CLOSED SESSION 13A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) Potential Number of Cases: 1 There was no announcement from the Closed Session item. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes June 14, 2017 Page 10 14. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, Chairman Tavaglione adjourned the meeting at 11:03 a.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, July 12, 2017, Board Chambers, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Harmon Clerk of the Board AGENDA ITEM 6 PUBLIC HEARING RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Josefina Clemente, Transit Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Riverside County Transit Services Funding Allocation for Fiscal Year 2017/18 BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a public hearing at its July Commission meeting on the proposed Section 5307 Program of Projects (POP); 2) Approve the Fiscal Year 2017/18 Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) Section 5307 and 5311 POP for Riverside County; 3) Approve the FY 2017/18 Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) fund allocations for transit; 4) Direct staff to add projects into the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP); and 5) Adopt Resolution No. 17-012, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to Allocate State Transit Assistance Funds". BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its June 14 meeting, the Commission approved the FYs 2017/18 — 2019/20 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTPs) for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and Riverside; the Commission's Commuter Rail Program; Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA); Riverside Transit Agency (RTA); and SunLine Transit Agency (Sun Line). The core components of each agency's SRTP include the operating and capital plans and accompanying budget with cost estimates for each aspect of the plan along with an implementation timeline. The SRTPs also document each operator's system and route performance data, which provide the basis for the Commission's oversight activities to ensure compliance with the Transportation Development Act (TDA), federal regulations, state law, and Commission -adopted policies and guidelines. SRTP Financial and Ridership Overview Approximately $183 million in total funding is required to support the FY 2017/18 operating and capital requests for the provision of transit services in Riverside County. The following table Agenda Item 6 1 provides an overview of the total operating and capital costs together with projected ridership levels by apportionment area. FY 2017/18 Operating, Capital and Ridership Projections Expense Type Western Riverside Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Total Bus Rail Bus Rail Operating Capital $ 93,166,887 $ 36,790,955 5,871,709 284,654 $ 34,880,026 $ 226,800 10,406,555 $ 1,207,598 140,503 $ 166,272,266 16,703,421 Total (Operating & Capital)* $ 99,038,596 $ 37,075,609 $ 45,286,581 $ 226,800 $ 1,348,101 $ 182,975,687 FY 2017/18 Projected Ridership 9,703,345 3,292,226 4,178,161 0 51,392 17,225,124 * Exclusive of LA Metro, OCTA & SANBAG's share and passenger fare revenues for Commuter Rail expenses Total operating expenses for next year's bus transit operations reflect a systemwide increase of 6 percent but significant decrease of 53 percent in capital expenditures compared to FY 2016/17 funding levels. The rise in operating costs is attributable mainly to rising operating expenses for new route services and expanded service hours to meet public demand, increasing personnel costs, as well as the additional expense of conducting comprehensive operational analyses and related transit studies planned next year. Bus capital funds programmed in FY 2017/18 are much lower than the previous year due to significant capital outlay programmed last year for vehicle procurements including SunLine's hydrogen fuel cell buses and planned construction of new operations and maintenance facilities by both RTA and SunLine. Rail operating funds programmed last year include $20 million in federal Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) funds, set aside to cover the Perris Valley Line's operating expenses for five years at an average of $4 million per year. The $20 million of CMAQ funds is a one-time infusion of operating funds programmed in FY 2016/17; therefore, it is not accurate to compare expenditures between the two fiscal years. Rail capital funding programmed this new fiscal year is also lower due to significant capital funds programmed in FY 2016/17. These funds included the FTA Section 5307 and Section 5337 federal funds for commuter rail passenger upgrades and Rail State of Good Repair project, in addition to the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee grant funds that were programmed through an SRTP amendment last year. Agenda Item 6 2 FY 2017/18 and FY 2016/17 OPERATING & CAPITAL PROGRAM FUNDS BY MODE EXPENSE TYPE Bus Rail BUS & RAIL FY 2017/18 OP/CAP to Total BUS & RAIL FY 2016/17 % OP/CAP to Total TOTAL BUS Si RAIL % CHANGE FY 2017/18 FY 2016/17 % Change FY 2017/18 FY 2016/17 % Change OPERATING $ 129,254,511 $ 121,818,879 6.10% $ 37,017,755 $ 60,009,995 -38.31% 166,272,266 90.9% 181,828,874 71.3% -8.56% CAPITAL 16,418,767 35,287,694 -53.47% 284,654 37,730,425 -99.25% 16,703,421 9.1% 73,018,119 28.7% -77.12% TOTAL $ 145,673,278 $ 157,106,573 -7.28% $ 37,302,409 $ 97,740,420 -61.84% $ 182,975,687 100.0% $ 254,846,993 100.0% -28.20% FY 2017/18 Operating and Capital Costs To implement the SRTPs for FY 2017/18, the programming plan is to utilize available funding of approximately $166.3 million for operating and $16.7 million for capital purposes. This total does not include the additional rail and fare subsidies from the other Metrolink partner agencies to leverage the Commission's Commuter Rail Program. The following chart provides an overview of the operating and capital costs by funding source required to support the county's transit operations. Riverside County: FY 2017/18 Operating and Capital Costs � TDA (LTF & STA Funds), $97,884,391, 53% Carryover Funds (Meal A/Sec 53o 7/LCTO P/CMA4 Carryover), $1,708,8 1% Other Revenues (Includes TUMF&BWE), $5,316,330 ,3% - Passenger Fares; $22,252,603, 12% v Measure A,$20,184,375, 11% is Federal Formula Funds (Sec 5307, 5311, 5311f, 5310, 5339) & CMAQ, $3°,779,230, 17% State Prop 1B Security, LCTOP,AQEP, $3,33o,o93, 2% ■ Lo No, $1,519,855, 1% Agenda Item 6 3 Approximately $153.7 million (84 percent) consists of federal, state, and local funds, including Proposition 1B Security funds and Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funds that are primarily allocated through Commission action. This also includes the Air Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) funds programmed by SunLine. The remaining $29.3 million (16 percent) of the $183 million total operating and capital costs identified in the chart is funded by the following sources: • $22.3 million — Passenger fares (Bus & Rail) • $ 1.7 million — Carryover funds (Measure A, Federal Section 5307, CMAQ, and LCTOP) • $ 5.3 million — Miscellaneous other revenues (advertising fees, compressed natural gas sales, general fund contributions, low carbon fuel standard credits, building lease, medical reimbursements, state responsibility area overhead fee, taxi voucher sales, insurance recoveries, bus shelter maintenance revenue, and interest income) Transportation Development Act Funding TDA provides funding through two sources, the LTF and STA, and is one of the major funding sources for public transit in California. LTF is derived from a quarter cent of the statewide general sales tax collected within each county. The State Board of Equalization returns the sales tax revenues to the county of Riverside where it is held until the Commission provides written allocation instructions for disbursement. It is estimated that LTF revenues for transit services for FY 2017/18 will be $82 million reflecting a 6.8 percent decrease compared to the revised projected amount for FY 2016/17, and is consistent with the revenue projection included in the June 2017 Commission adoption of the FY 2017/18 budget. There is approximately $90.1 million in LTF unallocated reserve funds projected at the end of FY 2016/17, resulting in a total available amount of $163.9 million in FY 2017/18, excluding a 10 percent reserve of FY 2017/18 revenues for unforeseen cost increases or emergencies. Of this LTF amount, approximately $92.4 million is programmed by county transit operators for FY 2017/18 operating needs. STA funding is derived from sales tax on diesel fuel. Fifty percent of STA funds are allocated according to population, and the other 50 percent is allocated according to the ratio of fare revenues generated in each area during the prior fiscal year. For Riverside County, there is approximately $54.6 million in STA unallocated reserve funds projected at the end of FY 2016/17. Additional revenues of $9.4 million are anticipated in FY 2017/18 for a total available amount of $64 million. About $5.4 million of the available STA funds will be programmed by county transit operators for various transit services operating and capital projects in FY 2017/18. STA annual revenues continued to decline this year, 3.3 percent lower than in FY 2016/17; therefore, agencies are advised to continue using the current fund reserve conservatively and to spend down existing capital balances prior to requesting additional funds (per Commission policy). Agenda Item 6 4 Prior to approving STA allocations, the Commission must adopt the attached resolution as specified in the TDA statutes and regulations. To claim LTF and/or STA funds, the Commission must allocate funds to support the transit services and capital projects contained in each operator's SRTP. The requested allocations need to be explicit for the projects stated in the approved plans and consistent with the approved SRTPs. Attachment 2 outlines the TDA allocations for FY 2017/18 requested by each operator. Measure A Funding Measure A, the half -cent sales tax transportation initiative in Riverside County, is another primary source of funding for transit. Measure A funds for transit programs in Western County and Coachella Valley provide funding support for specialized transit, intercity bus services, and commuter rail. About 11 percent of the proposed FY 2017/18 expenditures will be covered by Measure A funds. The spending plan for the new fiscal year is outlined below. FY 2017/18 Measure A Requested Funds Agency Amount RTA $ 3,240,975 RCTC Commuter Rail 11,790,000 SunLine 5,153,400 Total $ 20,184,375 Proposition 1B Security Funding Proposition 1B bond proceeds fund various transportation programs, including the California Transit Security Program (Security) managed by the California Office of Emergency Services. Under the Proposition 1B Security program, eligible projects include capital projects to protect against security threats or develop a disaster response plan for transit. Riverside County was appropriated approximately $666,695 in FY 2016/17 Proposition 113 Security funds that are programmed in FY 2017/18. Proposition 113 Security funds programmed by agencies in FY 2017/18 are as follows: FY 2017/18 Proposition 1B Security Requested Funds Agency Amount City of Banning $ 15,362 City of Beaumont 14,990 City of Riverside 38,789 SunLine 298,909 RCTC Commuter Rail 284,654 PVVTA 13,991 Total $ 666,695 Agenda Item 6 5 Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Funding LCTOP is funded from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund aimed at providing operating and capital assistance for transit agencies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve mobility with a priority to serve disadvantaged communities. The programmed LCTOP funding in Riverside County is part of the state's $34.6 million appropriation for FY 2016/17, as detailed in the state of California's 2014 Budget Act. Caltrans, as the administering agency for LCTOP, prepares allocation shares to regional entities determined by formula, based on population and ratio of revenue of transit operator's jurisdiction to the total operator revenues in the state. Eligible recipients include transportation planning agencies, county transportation commissions, and transit operators. FY 2017/18 LCTOP Requested Funds Agency Amount City of Banning $ 74,561 City of Corona 57,000 RCTC Commuter Rail 183,080 RTA-1,036,018* SunLine 249,672 PVVTA 11,512 Total $-460,193 *RTA originally programmed LCTOP funds of $1,492,532 for its UCR Mobility Hub project in FY 2016/17 but in FY 2017/18, RTA reprogrammed the capital funds to operating to expand its Route 19 services. Of this $1,492,532, only $456,514 was identified for use in FY 17/18, resulting in a credit of $1,036,018 in LCTOP funds in FY 2017/18. Air Quality Improvement Program Funding AQIP is a voluntary incentive program administered by the California Air Resources Board to fund clean vehicle and equipment projects that yield air quality impacts of alternative fuels. In April 2016, SunLine successfully secured a FY 2014/15 AQIP award in the amount of $12.5 million to implement SunLine's Fuel Cell Buses and Hydrogen Onsite Refueling Station Pilot Commercial Deployment project. The project objective is to accelerate the adoption and commercial deployment of heavy-duty emission technologies by deploying five fuel cell electric buses using 100 percent renewable energy supported by a hydrogen refueling station with on -site hydrogen generator. This project will also serve as a one -stop -shop solution for other fleet operators to eliminate fuel cell bus adoption barriers caused by lack of available heavy-duty hydrogen refueling stations. Last year, $9,463,200 was programmed for the proposed five fuel cell electric buses, which will be operated on regular routes from the communities of Indio to Mecca and Oasis, providing zero emission transportation to disadvantaged communities. The remaining $3,123,591 of the total AQIP grant award is being programmed in FY 2017/18. Agenda Item 6 6 FY 2017/18 AQIP Requested Funds Agency Amount SunLine $ 3,123,591 Total $ 3,123,591 Section 5307 Formula Funds FTA Section 5307 is authorized each year via the federal transportation bill in urbanized areas of 50,000 or more. Funds are distributed to regions by urbanized area formula based upon population served and the amount of transit service provided. Under Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21), the use of urbanized area (UZA) formula funds has been expanded to include the former Job Access and Reverse Commute program. In addition, only urbanized areas with populations below 200,000 were eligible to use the Section 5307 funds for operating. Under MAP-21 and the current Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act, transit systems operating 100 or fewer buses in fixed -route service during peak service hours may now use up to 75 percent of their share of funding for operating. The new program also allows up to 85 percent federal share for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant vehicles for paratransit service. Riverside County consists of four UZAs, namely: • Riverside/San Bernardino; • Hemet/San Jacinto; • Temecula/Murrieta; and • Indio/Cathedral City/Palm Springs. The Commission must develop and approve a POP for each UZA and conduct a public hearing prior to an operator submitting its Section 5307 grant application to FTA. If the draft POP is not amended through the public hearing process, the POP will become final as presented and will be included in an approved FTIP, which is subsequently forwarded to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for review and processing. The proposed Section 5307 POP for Riverside County is shown in Attachment 3. Requested funds by operators are shown below: FY 2017/18 Section 5307 Requested Funds Agency Amount City of Corona $ 575,200 RTA 22,530,045 SunLine 4,510,000 Total $ 27,615,245 The actual Section 5307 apportionments for FY 2017/18 will not be known until later this calendar year when final appropriations are made by Congress. The POP was developed at the highest anticipated funding amount based on actual available apportionments for FY 2016/17, to allow Agenda Item 6 7 the operators to proceed with the grant applications and avoid delays associated with program amendments. Any excess funds will be carried over to the subsequent fiscal year and will be made available to cover future projects. Sections 5310 Funds — Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities The federal Section 5310 grant provides financial assistance to enhance mobility of seniors and persons with disabilities to serve their special needs beyond traditional public transit and ADA complementary paratransit. The program's main focus is funding mobility management activities and capital project expenses, primarily for nonprofit agencies; however, public agencies are eligible to apply for projects if the public agencies certify that no non-profit organizations are readily available to provide the services. The program was modified under MAP-21 and offers additional project eligibility categories resulting in the consolidation of the former Section 5317 program, which was repealed and combined with the Section 5310 program. Section 5310 funds can be used to cover both capital and operating expenses. RTA identified the use of Section 5310 funding to cover expenses for its ongoing travel training program. SunLine will use Section 5310 funds to partially fund its taxi voucher program. FY 2017/18 Section 5310 Requested Funds Agency Amount RTA $ 400,000 SunLine 46,667 Total $ 446,667 Section 5311 Formula and Discretionary Funds The federal Section 5311 transit funding provides formula funds to rural or non -urbanized areas in the state. The program is administered by Caltrans, and the majority of these funds are passed through to counties based on population formula. This year's program allocates a total of $900,769 for Riverside County, and, as in previous years, both RTA and SunLine identified the use of Section 5311 formula funds for operating. Remaining funds are awarded in a statewide discretionary program Section 5311(f) for rural capital projects and intercity bus programs. FY 2017/18 Section 5311 and 5311(f) Requested Funds Agency Section 5311 Section 5311 (f) RTA $ 555,774 $ SunLine 344,995 365,767 Total $ 900,769 $ 365,767 Agenda Item 6 8 Section 5339 Formula Funds The FTA Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities program provides capital funding to replace, rehabilitate and purchase buses/vans and related equipment and to construct bus -related facilities. Funds can also be used to introduce new technology and safety and security items for transit systems. It is a new formula grant program under MAP-21, replacing the previous Section 5309 Bus and Bus Facilities discretionary program. The program apportions funds to urban areas by population and service factors. This year's program allocates about $764,000 million in formula funds for RTA and SunLine. FY 2017/18 Section 5339 Requested Funds Agency Amount RTA $ 317,479 SunLine 446,894 Total $ 764,373 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Funds The CMAQ program helps fund regional and local efforts to attain compliance with national air quality standards established in the federal Clean Air Act. These funds are largely spent on transportation control measures. Eligible activities include transit improvements, travel demand management strategies, traffic flow improvements, and public fleet conversion to cleaner fuels. These funds are distributed by SCAG to regions, which conduct the project selection process according to its Regional Transportation Plan priorities. Program funds can be used for both capital and operating assistance. FY 2017/18 CMAQ Requested Funds Agency Amount SunLine $ 686,409 Total $ 686,409 Transit Uniform Mitigation Funding The Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program administered by the Western Riverside Council of Governments provides funding generated from fees assessed on new developments to ensure road improvements are put in place to mitigate increased traffic that the development project creates. RTA is currently allocated 1.64 percent of the fees collected for use on projects of regional significance located on the program network. For FY 2017/18, $300,000 of RTA's share of TUMF funds will be used to conduct an attitude awareness study and prepare a transportation network companies policy as part of RTA's project list included in the 2016 TUMF Nexus study. Agenda Item 6 9 FY 2017/18 TUMF Requested Funds Agency Amount RTA $ 300,000 Total $ 300,000 Low or No Emission Vehicle Deployment Program The FTA Low or No Emission Vehicle Deployment (LoNo) discretionary program provides funding to facilitate the development of zero and near zero emission bus technology and related infrastructure. The program funds are intended to encourage more widespread adoption of reliable "green energy" buses into transit fleets giving priority consideration to buses with the lowest energy consumption and least harmful emissions. The 2016 LoNo funds were awarded on a competitive basis to transit agencies and Sunline was awarded $1.5 million to implement a zero emissions transportation technologies training facility to support commercial operation of zero emission buses. FY 2017/18 LoNo Requested Funds Agency Amount SunLine $ 1,519,855 Total $ 1,519,855 Blythe Wellness Express The Blythe Wellness Express (BWE) is a coordinated partnership between the Commission, PVVTA, and the Palo Verde healthcare community to provide transportation options for residents of the Palo Verde Valley to access medical and healthcare services not available within the community. The BWE program mission parallels FTA's Ride to Wellness initiative and program goals. Blythe residents currently forgo care, over -utilized emergency services or make long and expensive regional trips to see doctors or specialists. This grant will provide a deviated fixed route, advance reservation, three -times weekly service linking Blythe with distant medical facilities as well as provide transfers to SunLine. The grant awarded to the Commission for the BWE program was for $185,753, and includes a local financial commitment of $125,826 (about 40 percent) of the total project cost of $311,579 for a term of 18 months. A total amount of $109,082 was programmed by PVVTA for FY 2017/18 operations, which is scheduled to start in July 2017. FY 2017/18 BWE Requested Funds Agency Amount PVVTA $ 109,082 Total $ 109,082 Agenda Item 6 10 Summary and Fiscal Impact Staff recommends approving the TDA and FTA funds as presented, as it is the Commission's responsibility to allocate and program these funds. If any additional funding revenue becomes available during the budget year, transit operators will prepare the necessary SRTP amendments, as appropriate, to identify new or expanded services and capital projects. Modifications in farebox revenues, other federal and state grants, Measure A funding, or carryover funds may require operators to revise these services to operate within the funding limit available. Funding allocations for LTF and STA are based on the revenue estimates developed for the FY 2017/18 Commission budget. FTA revenues do not pass through the Commission, except for rail, and are therefore not included in the Commission's budget. The FY 2017/18 budget adopted at the June Commission meeting included $98.7 million in LTF transit operating and $4.48 million in LTF transit capital expenditures, as well as $226,800 in STA transit operating and $21.32 million in STA transit capital expenditures. These budgeted LTF and STA expenditures, which include use of prior year capital allocations, are expected to be funded by FY 2017/18 revenues, as well as available fund balances. Based on the final recommended LTF and STA allocations, no budget adjustments are required. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Yes Year: FY 2017/18 Amount: $92,436,297 (LTF) $ 5,448,094 (STA) Source of Funds: TDA: LTF and STA Budget Adjustment: No No GLA No.: LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE Western County Bus Western County Bus 601 62 86101 P2210 $55,949,874 Western County Rail 241 62 86102 P2201 $1,655,576 Coachella Valley Bus 601 62 97001 P2213 $16,817,875 (Transfer Out) Coachella Valley Bus 241 62 86102 P2202 $ 3,450,718 Coachella Valley Rail 241 62 97001 P2202 $ 226,800 (Transfer Out) Palo Verde Valley 601 62 86101 P2211 $18,753,800 Palo Verde Valley 241 62 86102 P2203 $ 115,000 601 62 86101 P2212 $ 914,748 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \I-te/LiiteA, Date: 06/19/2017 Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 17-012 2) TDA Allocations (STA and LTF) 3) Section 5307 Program of Projects 4) FY 2017/18 and FY 2016/17 Operating and Capital Requests and Ridership Projections Agenda Item 6 11 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 17-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO ALLOCATE STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission is designated the regional entity responsible for the allocation of State Transit Assistance Funds within Riverside County; and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission has examined the Short Range Transit Plans and Transportation Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, all proposed expenditures in Riverside County are in conformity with the Regional Transportation Plan; and WHEREAS, the level of passenger fares is sufficient for claimants to meet the fare revenue requirements of Public Utilities Code Sections 99268.2, 99268.3, 99268.4, 99268.5, and 99268.9, as applicable; and WHEREAS, the claimant is making full use of federal funds available under the Federal Transit Act; and WHEREAS, the sum of the claimant's allocations from the state transit assistance fund and from the local transportation fund does not exceed the amount the claimant is eligible to receive during the fiscal year; and WHEREAS, priority consideration has been given to claims to offset reductions in federal operating assistance and the unanticipated increase in the cost of fuel, to enhance existing public transportation services, and to meet high priority regional, countywide, or area -wide public transportation needs; and WHEREAS, the public transit operators have made a reasonable effort to implement the productivity improvements recommended pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 99244; and WHEREAS, the claimant is not precluded by any contract entered into on or after June 28, 1979, from employing part-time drivers or contracting with common carriers or persons operating under a franchise or license; and WHEREAS, operators are in full compliance with Section 18081.1 of the Vehicle Code, as required in Public Utilities Code Section 99251. 12 ATTACHMENT 1 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Riverside County Transportation Commission to allocate State Transit Assistance Funds for FY 2017/18 as detailed in Attachment 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of July, 2017. John F. Tavaglione, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Jennifer Harmon, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 13 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 1 of 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDING FY 2017/18 TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS AGENCY/APPORTIONMENT AREA ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED NON - RECOMMENDED LTF OPERATING LTF CAPITAL LTF TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS FOR OPERATING COSTS CAPITAL COSTS TOTAL COSTS LTF REVENUES FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 City of Banning $ 1,850,000 City of Beaumont 2,670,933 City of Corona 2,516,437 Riverside Special Services 4,530,687 Riverside Transit Agency 81,598,830 $ 125,362 314,990 - 38,789 5,392,568 $ 1,975,362 2,985,923 2,516,437 4,569,476 86,991,398 $ 387,923 582,083 1,001,116 605,789 40,511,811 $ 1,587,439 2,403,840 1,515,321 3,963,687 46,479,587 $ 1,587,439 2,403,840 1,515,321 3,963,687 46,479,587 $ - - - - - TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - BUS 93,166,887 5,871,709 99,038,596 43,088,722 55,949,874 55,949,874 - RCTC's Commuter Rail (Metrolink) 36,790,955 284,654 37,075,609 20,257,734 16,817,875 16,817,875 - TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - RAIL 36,790,955 284,654 37,075,609 20,257,734 16,817,875 16,817,875 - SunLine Transit Agency 34,880,026 10,406,555 45,286,581 26,532,781 18,753,800 18,753,800 - TOTAL: COACHELLA VALLEY - BUS 34,880,026 10,406,555 45,286,581 26,532,781 18,753,800 18,753,800 - RCTC's Rail (Coachella) 226,800 - 226,800 226,800 - TOTAL: COACHELLA VALLEY - RAIL 226,800 - 226,800 226,800 - - Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency 1,207,598 140,503 1,348,101 433,353 914,748 914,748 - TOTAL: PALO VERDE VALLEY 1,207,598 140,503 1,348,101 433,353 914,748 914,748 - COUNTYWIDE TOTAL $ 166,272,266 $ 16,703,421 $ 182,975,687 $ 90,539,390 $ 92,436,297 $ 92,436,297 $ - 14 ATTACHMENT Page 2 of 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDING FY 2017/18 TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS AGENCY/APPORTIONMENT AREA ESTIMATED STA ESTIMATED STA ESTIMATED STA RECOMMENDED STA STA Operating $ STA Capital CARRY OVER TRANSIT ALLOCATIONS OPERATING COSTS CAPITAL COSTS $ FUNDS FOR FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 City of Banning $ - $ 110,000 City of Beaumont 300,000 City of Corona - - Riverside Special Services - - Riverside Transit Agency - 1,245,576 - $ 110,000 300,000 - - - - - 1,245,576 $ - - - - 110,000 300,000 - - 1,245,576 TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - BUS - 1,655,576 - 1,655,576 - 1,655,576 RCTC's Commuter Rail (Metrolink) - - - - - TOTAL: WESTERN RIVERSIDE - RAIL - - - - _ - SunLine Transit Agency - 3,450,718 - 3,450,718 - 3,450,718 TOTAL: COACHELLA VALLEY -BUS - 3,450,718 - 3,450,718 - 3,450,718 RCTC's Rail (Coachella) 226,800 - - 226,800 226,800 - TOTAL: COACHELLA VALLEY -RAIL 226,800 - 226,800 226,800 - Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency - 115,000 - 115,000 - 115,000 ITOTAL: PALO VERDE VALLEY - 115,000 - 115,000 - 115,000 COUNTYWIDE TOTAL $ 226,800 $ 5,221,294 $ - $ 5,448,094 $ 226,800 $ 5,221,294 15 ATTACHMENT Page 1 of 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2017/18 URBANIZED AREA: RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNARDINO Total Apportionment (FY 17/18 Est based on annualized partial FY 16/17 Apportionment per 1/19/17 Fed Register & Inter -county Allocation Actuals) Apportionment Lapsing Funds (per FTA) Carryover (Estimate) Total Funds Available Less Current Requests Bus Rail Total $ 11,815,611 $ 5,191,539 $ 17,007,151 10,818,727 (461,138) 10,357,590 22,634,339 4,730,402 27,364,741 12,032,733 - 12,032,733 Balance (Projected) $ 10,601,606 $ 4,730,402 $ 15,332,008 Sub Area Allocation Corona, City of Riverside Transit Agency $ 575,200 11,457,533 TOTAL $ 12,032,733 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT Corona, City of 1) Capital Cost of Operating for Fixed Route & Dial -a -ride $ 644,000 $ 515,200 Capital/operating SCAG 2) Comprehensive Operational Analysis $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Capital/Operating SCAG TOTAL: City of Corona $ 704,000 $ 575,200 Riverside Transit Agency 3) Operating Assistance (JARC project) 1,888,889 $ 850,000 Operating SCAG 4) Capitalized Preventive Maintenance 8,750,000 5,000,000 Capital/Operating SCAG 5) ADA Complementary Paratransit Service 1,937,500 1,100,000 Capital/Operating SCAG 6) Capital Cost of Contracting 7,125,000 3,000,000 Capital/Operating SCAG 7) Fare Study 135,000 108,000 Capital SCAG 8) Associated Transit Improvements 50,000 10,000 Capital SCAG 9) Capitalized Tire Lease 350,000 80,000 Capital SCAG 10) Maintenance Support Equipment 4,361 3,489 Capital SCAG 11) Facility Maintenance 2,039,231 1,306,044 Capital SCAG Updated: 6/15/2017 Approved: TOTAL: Riverside Transit Agency 22,279,981 $ 11,457,533 GRAND TOTAL $ 22,983,981 $ 12,032,733 16 ATTACHMENT Page 2 of 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2017/18 URBANIZED AREA: HEMET/SAN JACINTO RECIPIENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (FY17/18 Estimate based on annualized partial FY16/17 Apportionment per 1/19/17 Fed Register Actuals Apportionment Carryover (estimate) Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) Total Funds Available Less Current Requests Balance (Projected) $ 3,157,632 2,840,965 5,998,597 5,692,512 $ 306,085 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Operating Assistance $ 43,218,433 $ 2,000,000 Operating Caltrans 2) Revenue Vehicles - (11) COFR Replacement 2,162,050 1,837,743 Capital Caltrans 3) Revenue Vehicles - (5) DAR Replacement 466,813 396,791 Capital Caltrans 4) Non -Revenue Vehicles - 1 car/3 trucks/2 trailer: 315,796 252,637 Capital Caltrans 5) Facility Maintenance 2,039,231 325,341 Capital Caltrans 6) Information Systems 1,100,000 880,000 Capital Caltrans TOTAL: $ 49,302,323 $ 5,692,512 Updated: 6/15/2017 Approved: 17 ATTACHMENT 3 Page 3 of 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2017/18 URBANIZED AREA: INDIO/CATHEDRAL CITY/PALM SPRINGS RECIPIENT: SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (FY 17/18 Estimate based on annualized partial FY 16/17 Apportionment per 1/19/17 Fed Register Actuals) Apportionment $ 4,510,815 Carryover (Estimate) 72,433 Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) Total Funds Available 4,583,249 Less Current Requests 4,510,000 Balance (Projected) $ 73,249 NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Operating Assistance $ 33,237,664 $ 2,943,412 Operating SCAG 2) Replacement Fixed Route Buses (3) 2,040,000 734,588 Capital SCAG 3) Information Technology System (IT) Projects 450,000 360,000 Capital SCAG 4) Fixed Route Bus Rehabilitation 250,000 200,000 Capital SCAG 5) Facility Improvements 100,000 80,000 Capital SCAG Replacement Non -Revenue Support 6) Vehicles (2 Supervisor, 2 Safety) 240,000 192,000 Capital SCAG TOTAL: $ 36,317,664 $ 4,510,000 Updated: 6/15/2017 Approved: 18 ATTACHMENT Page 4 of 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FTA SECTION 5307 FY 2017/18 URBANIZED AREA: TEMECULA/MURRIETA RECIPIENT: RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Total Apportionment (FY 17/18 Estimate based on annualized partial FY 16/17 Apportionment per 1/19/17 Fed Register Actuals) Apportionment $ 4,533,914 Lapsing Funds (per FTA) Carryover (Estimate) 881,031 Transfer of Funds (CMAQ) Total Funds Available 5,414,944 Less Current Requests 5,380,000 Balance (Projected) $ 34,944 TOTAL FEDERAL PROJECT DESIGNATED NUMBER PROGRAM OF PROJECTS AMOUNT SHARE TYPE RECIPIENT 1) Capital Cost of Contracting $ 7,125,000 $ 2,700,000 Capital/Operating SCAG 2) Capitalized Preventive Maintenance 8,750,000 2,000,000 Capital/Operating SCAG 3) ADA Complementary Paratransit Service 1,937,500 450,000 Operating SCAG 4) Associated Transit Improvements 50,000 30,000 Capital SCAG 5) Capitalized Tire Lease 350,000 200,000 Capital SCAG TOTAL: $ 18,212,500 $ 5,380,000 Updated: 6/15/2017 Approved: 19 ATTACHMENT 4 Comparison of FY 2017/18 & FY 2016/17 Operating & Capital Costs and Ridership Projections OPERATING CAPITAL TOTAL COST RIDERSHIP AGENCY/APPORTIONMENT AREA FY 17/18 FY 16/17 % Incr/Decr FY 17/18 FY 16/17 % Incr/Decr FY 17/18 FY16/17 % Incr/Decr FY 17/18 Projection FY 16/17 Estimate % Incr/Decr City of Banning $ 1,850,000 1,682,001 9.99% $ 125,362 $ 69,199 81.16% $ 1,975,362 $ 1,751,200 12.80% 199,540 132,748 50.31% City of Beaumont 2,670,933 2,549,939 4.74% 314,990 734,008 -57.09% 2,985,923 3,283,947 -9.08% 234,762 242,400 -3.15% City of Corona 2,516,437 2,473,717 1.73% - 932,021 -100.00% 2,516,437 3,405,738 -26.11% 201,841 198,457 1.71% Riverside Special Services 4,530,687 4,364,819 3.80% 38,789 694,395 -94.41% 4,569,476 5,059,214 -9.68% 189,000 170,000 11.18% Riverside Transit Agency 81,598,830 76,263,710 7.00% 5,392,568 13,637,711 -60.46% 86,991,398 89,901,421 -3.24% 8,878,202 8,773,798 1.19% Western County: Bus 93,166,887 87,334,186 6.68% 5,871,709 16,067,334 -63.46% 99,038,596 103,401,520 -4.22% 9,703,345 9,517,403 1.95% Western County: Rail 36,790,955 56,950,600 -35.40% 284,654 37,730,425.00 -99.25% 37,075,609 94,681,025 -60.84% 3,292,226 3,204,369 2.74% WESTERN COUNTY: TOTAL (Bus & Rail) 129,957,842 144,284,786 -9.93% 6,156,363 53,797,759 -88.56% 136,114,205 198,082,545 -31.28% 12,995,571 12,721,772 2.15% SunLine Transit Agency (Bus) 34,880,026 33,474,111 4.20% 10,406,555 19,055,873 -45.39% 45,286,581 52,529,984 -13.79% 4,178,161 4,190,436 -0.29% Coachella Valley (Rail) 226,800 3,059,395 -92.59% 226,800 3,059,395 -92.59% COACHELLA VALLEY: TOTAL (Bus & Rail) 35,106,826 36,533,506 -3.91% 10,406,555 19,055,873 -45.39% 45,513,381 55,589,379 -18.13% 4,178,161 4,190,436 -0.29% Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency 1,207,598 1,010,582 19.50% 140,503 164,487 -14.58% 1,348,101 1,175,069 14.73% 51,392 48,299 6.40% PALO VERDE VALLEY: TOTAL 1,207,598 1,010,582 19.50% 140,503 164,487 -14.58% 1,348,101 1,175,069 14.73% 51,392 48,299 6.40% TOTAL: ALL AREAS $ 166,272,266 $ 181,828,874 -8.56% $ 16,703,421 $ 73,018,119 -77.12% $ 182,975,687 $ 254,846,993 -28.20% 17,225,124 16,960,507 1.56% Notes: FY 2017/18 total cost includes $1,708,810 in Measure A/5307/LCTOP/CMAQ carryover funds from prior year. * RTA's FY 16/17 capital budget reflects modified capital amount per FY 16/17 SRTP Amendment approved by the Commission 5/10/17. Added $172,143 STA, $688,570 Sec 5339, $1,492,532 LCTOP (Total add'I capital=$2,353,245) *RTA's FY 16/17 operating budget reflects modified operating amount per FY 16/17 SRTP Amendments (1 & 2) approved by Commission 9/14/16. Added $225,000 CMAQ and $41,122 Measure A Rail *RCTC Rail's FY 16/17 operating budget reflects modified operating amount per FY 16/17 SRTP Amendment approved by Commission 1/11/17. $20,000,000 of federal CMAQ funding was programmed for PVL operating assistance for 5 years. *RCTC Rail's FY16/17 capital budget reflects modified capital amount per FY16/17 SRTP Amendment approved by Commission 5/10/17. Added $16,956,682 of 5307 & $16,816,916 of 5337 funds. Also added $3,109,241 MSRC funds, per SRTP amendment approved 11/9/16. 20 NMI Riverside County Transportation Commission Fiscal Year 2017/18 Funding Allocation for Riverside County Transit Services July 12, 2017 Short Range Transit Plans FY 2017/18 - FY 2019/20 m`"il IMMEN� Riverside County ironsporiotion Commission City of Banning City of Corona City of Beaumont City of Riverside Riverside Transit Agency SunLine Transit Agency e Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency RCTC Rail Program [WR -- Commuter Rail] [CV — Intercity Rail] Riverside County FY 2017/18 Transit Funding Request Riverside [aunty Transportation Commission OPERATING AND CAPITAL PROGRAM FUN FY 2017/18 VS. FY 2016/17 Riverside County Transportation {ommission EXPENSE FY 2017/18 FY 2016/17 %CHANGE (FY 18 vs FY 17) TYPE Bus (million) Rail (million) Total (million) BUS (million) Rail (million) Total (million) OPERATING $129.3 $37.0 $166.3 $121.8 $ 60.0 $181.8 -9% CAPITAL 16.4 .3 16.7 35.3 37.7 73.0 -77% TOTAL $145.7 $37.3 $183.0 $157.1 $ 97.7 $254.8 -28% FY 2017/18 TRANSIT FINANCIAL PLAN BY REVENUE SOURCE TDA (LTF & STA Funds), $97,884,391 , 53% Carryover Funds (Meal A/Sec 5307/LCTOP/CMAQ / Carryover), $1,708,81 , 1% Other Revenues (Includes TUMF & BWE), $5,316,330 , 3% Passenger Fares, $22,252,603 , J 12% Lo No, $1,519,855 , 1% r,■ NNW Riverside County Ira nsporlotion Commission Measure A, $20,184,375 , 11% Federal Formula Funds (Sec 5307, 5311, 5311f, 531 5339) & CMAQ, $30,779,2: , 17% State Prop 1B (Cap+Security), LCTOP, AQIP, $3,330,093 , 2% Staff Recommendations Riveni a T�lan�iss�o • Conduct a public hearing at its July Commission meeting on the proposed Section 5307 POP at the July Commission meeting; j • Approve the FY 2017/18 FTA Section 5307 and 5311 POP for Riverside County; • Approve the FY 2017/18 LTF and STA fund allocations for transit; • Direct staff to add projects into the FTIP; and J • Adopt Resolution No. 17-012, "Resolution of the Riverside county Transportation Commission to allocate STA Funds". J AGENDA ITEM 7A RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Audit Ad Hoc Committee Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: State Incurred Cost Audit AUDIT AD HOC COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the May 2017 Riverside County Transportation Commission Incurred Cost Audit performed by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission is a recipient of state and federal funds for various transportation projects; accordingly, it must comply with state and federal laws, regulations, and agreements. Further, Caltrans has a legal and fiduciary responsibility to ensure that state and federal funds are expended in compliance with such laws, regulations, and agreements. Accordingly, Caltrans performed an audit of the costs claimed and reimbursed to the Commission during the period of January 1, 2012 through September 1, 2015, under agreements with Caltrans for the following projects were adequately supported and in accordance with respective agreement provisions and state and federal regulations: Project Description Total Funding Reimbursements Amount Audited Unallowable or Questioned Costs Interstate (I) 215 Blaine project STPLN-6054(072) $ 1,957,340 $ 725,420 $ 7,997 State Route (SR)74/I-215 interchange project STPESPLN-6054(063) 15,554,530 2,235,447 18,937 SR-71/SR-91 connector project HP21LN-6054(066) 7,530,865 550,649 31,566 Freeway Service Patrol project FSP15-6054(068) 1,107,166 441,756 - Total $ 26,149,901 $3,953,272 $ 58,500 The draft audit report included as an attachment discloses four findings and indicates $58,500 of costs claimed and reimbursed, or 1.5 percent of costs audited and 0.2 percent of the total reimbursements, were not in compliance with respective agreement provisions and state and Agenda Item 7A 21 federal regulations. The Commission provided the attached response to the findings and questioned costs. The response will be incorporated into the final audit report, which will be posted on the Ca!trans Audits and Investigations website. Attachments: 1) Audit Report (draft) on Riverside County Transportation Commission Incurred Cost Audit, May 2017 2) Commission Response to Riverside County Transportation Commission Incurred Cost Audit Draft Report, dated June 6, 2017 Agenda Item 7A 22 DRAFT 23 ATTACHMENT 1 Audit Report May 2017 Riverside County Transportation Commission Incurred Cost Audit PREPARED BY: California Department of Transportation Audits and Investigations — MS 2 Post Office Box 942874 Sacramento, California 94274-0001 www.dot.ca.gov/hq/audits AUDIT TEAM MarSue Morrill, Chief, External Audits -Local Governments Cliff Vose, Audit Manager Lisa Moreno, Auditor -in -Charge Ngoc Bui, Auditor Ramci Mazhar, Auditor P 1575-0050 "Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability" 24 Riverside County Transportation Commission Incurred Cost Audit TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 OBJECTIVES 1 SCOPE 1 METHODOLOGY 2 BACKGROUND 2 CONCLUSION 2 VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS 2 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS �# FINDING 1— Contract Management Needs Improvement 4 FINDING 2 — Documentation and Administration of Procurements Need Improvement 5 FINDING 3 — Construction Change Orders Lacked Supporting Documentation 7 FINDING 4 -- Required Contract Provisions Were Missing S ATTACHMENTS I. Audit Universe, Disallowed and Questioned Costs II. Criteria III. Contract Provision Exeptions IV. CCO Questioned Costs V. Riverside County Transportation Commission's Response to Draft Report 25 Riverside County Transportation Commission Incurred Cost Audit SUMMARY, OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, METHODOLOGY, BACKGROUND, AND CONCLUSION SUMMARY The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Audits and Investigations (A&1) audited project costs totaling $3,953,272 reimbursed to the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and found project costs totaling $58,500 were not in compliance with respective agreement provisions, and state and federal regulations. OBJECTIVES This audit was performed to determine whether project costs claimed by and reimbursed to RCTC were allowable, adequately supported, and in compliance with the respective agreement provisions, and state and federal regulations. The audit included costs incurred on the I-215 Blaine project, STPLN-6054(072); State Route (SR) 74/1-215 Interchange project, STPESPLN-6054(063); SR 71/SR 91 Connector project, HP21LN- 6054(066); and Freeway Service Patrol project, FSP15-6054(068) during the period from January 1, 2012 through September 1, 2015. SCOPE The scope of the audit was limited to reviewing financial and compliance activities. The audit of RCTC's financial management system included interviews of RCTC staff necessary to obtain an understanding of RCTC's financial management system. The audit consisted of transaction testing of reimbursed project costs to evaluate compliance with Title 2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 225; Title 4.8 CFR Chapter 1 Part 31; Title 49 CFR Part 18; Title 23 CFR; Caltrans' Local Assistance Procedures Manual; and requirements stipulated in the RCTC's agreements with, Caltrans. Field work was completed on February 21, 2017, and transactions occurring subsequent to this date were not tested and accordingly, our conclusion does not include costs or credits arising after this date. RCTC is responsible for the claimed costs, compliance with applicable agreement provisions and state and federal regulations, and the adequacy of their financial management system to accumulate and segregate reasonable, allocable and allowable costs. Because of inherent limitations in any financial management system, misstatements due to enxor or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, any projection or evaluation of the financial management system in future periods using the results of this audit are subject to the risk that the financial management system may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. 1 26 Riverside County Transportation Commission Incurred Cost Audit METHODOLOGY We conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. The audit was less in scope than an audit performed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the financial statements of ROTC. Therefore, we did not audit and are not expressing an opinion on RCTC's financial statements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the data and the records selected. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made, as well as evaluating the overall presentation. BACKGROUND Caltrans has a legal and fiduciary responsibility to ensure that all state and federal funds are expended in compliance with state and federal laws, regulations, and agreements. Title 23 CFR Part 1.9 requires that federal aid funds be expended in compliance with state and federal laws. Additionally, Title 23 CFR Part 1.36 states that payment of funds to a state can be withheld if the state has violated or failed to comply with federal laws or with the regulations of Title 23 CFR Part 1.36. Caltrans performs audits as one: of the ways to ensure it is meeting its legal and fiduciary responsibilities and that state and federal funds are properly expended by local government agencies. CONCLUSION Based on our audit, we determined RCTC: • Should reimbursed project costs totaling $35,750 (see Attachment 1) that were not in compliance with respective agreement provisions, and state and federal regulations. • Did not follow state and/or federal regulations related to contract management, procurement, or construction management. • Was reimbursed $22,750 in questionable costs related to a consultant contract management issue. VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS Our findings and recommendations consider RCTC's response dated XXX, to our XYLX, draft report. Our findings and recommendations, RCTC's response, and our analysis of the response arc set forth in the Findings and Recommendations of this report. A copy of RCTC's full written response is included as Attachment IV. 2 27 Riverside County Transportation Commission Incurred Cost Audit This report is intended as information for Caltrans management, the Federal Highway Administration, and RCTC. This report is a matter of public record and will be placed on Ca!trans A&I's website, which can be viewed at http://www.dot.ca.gov/audits/INC.html. If you have any questions, please contact Lisa Moreno, Auditor, at (916) 323-7885 or Cliff Vose, Audit Manager, at (916) 323-7917_ MARSUE MORRILL, CPA Chief External Audits -- Local Governments Audits and Investigations April XX, 2017 3 28 Riverside County Transportation C011i71diSsi011 Incurred Cost Audit FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FINDING 1— Contract Management Needs Improvement The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) billed for classifications that were not identified on the cost proposal, and billed costs that were not in accordance with their third party contract. Specifically we found the following; RCTC's contract with Parsons Transportation Group (Parsons) on the SR 711SR 91 Connector project included charges for several interns that were not listed on the cost proposal, individually or as a classification. The contract between Parsons and RCTC required that Parsons notify RCTC in writing prior to a change in the terms and rates included in the cost proposal, When asked, RCTC stated there was no written request or amendment done to add the individuals or classification to the contract. RCTC staff stated they gave, and believed it was sufficient, verbal approve for the use of the interns. We identified $8,816 in disallowed costs Parsons billed between May 2014 and May 2015. A Task Order for seven appraisal reviews issued under an on -call contract with Mason & Mason Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants on the SR 71/SR 91 Connector project was not in accordance with the terms and conditions of the on -call contract. The task orders estimated cost based on a per appraisal fee of $3,250, however, the on -call contract's basis of payment is specified hourly rates per individual or classification. Contract sections 3.22.1 states that "The Total Compensation per Contract Task Order shall be on the basis of direct costs ... "and section 3.22.2 states, "Consultant shall submit a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of services rendered by Consultant." When questioned, RCTC staff stated they felt the charge per appraisal was reasonable and within industry standards and they did not request a breakdown of the charges. We identified $22,750 in costs billed that were inconsistent with the terns and conditions of the contract. Since the work reimbursed was not in accordance with the terms of the contract, all costs are questioned.. In addition, the task order included a new cost proposal with higher hourly rates. Contract section 3.22.1 also stated that, "Consultant: shall receive compensation ... for the Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C". Exhibit "C" stated that compensation was as set forth herein, "1. Rates — Years 1-5". The contract cost proposal identified specific hourly rates of compensation. The specific rates of compensation method of payment provides for reimbursement of services on the basis of fixed hourly rates that once agreed to are not subject to change. It is also important to note that one of the factors used to evaluate proposals for the on - call contracts was "Cost", with the "basis on which prices are quoted" as part of the cost evaluation. Therefore, changes in the hourly rates would not be eligible for state or federal funding, and violates the original terms of the agreement. finally, the changes in the rates could also call into question the RFQ evaluations. Title 49 CFR 18.36 requires that RCTC ensure that contractors perform in accordance to the terns of their contracts. 4 29 Riverside County Transportation Commission Incurred Cost Audit We also identified two occasions where more than 20 hours a month were charged to the Bernard Arroyo contract without the required written approval. RCTC's contract with Bernard Arroyo states that no more than 20 hours a month will be charged unless approval is obtained in writing from the "SAFE Representative", i.e. RCTC. ROTC staff stated that sometimes they provided approval via phone discussion and felt this was sufficient since they had approved the work to be done. Federal regulations require that RCTC adhere to the terms and conditions of its contracts and that any changes to contracts be properly documented. Failure to follow contract terms or to properly document changes to those terms may call into question the allowability of costs and can lead to disputes over whether work performed was authorized which could result in disputes, claims, and ill will between the parties to the contract. See Attachment II for detailed criteria. RECOMMENDATION We recommend RCTC take the following actions: • Reimburse Caltrans the disallowed cost of $8,816 identified above. ■ Identify and reimburse any additional costs not identified above for work done by Parson Interns on the SR 711SR91 project. • Ensure all contract terms are understood and followed. a Maintain all documentation to support any changes to third party contracts. • Ensure personnel responsible for contact management are trained on RCTC's policy and procedures over contract management and the terms and conditions of their contracts. We also recommend that Caltrans Division of Local Assistance (DLA) work with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to determine if the $22,750 in questioned costs identified above should be reimbursed. SUMMARY OF RCTC'S RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF RCTC'S RESPONSE FINDING 2 — Documentation and Administration of Procurements Need Improvement RCTC did not maintain records to support that the procurements of professional service contracts met state and federal regulations. In addition, RCTC did not identify the method for assigning project -specific task orders in on -call contracts. Specifically we found the following: We reviewed four Requests for Qualifications/Requests for Proposals (RFQIRF'P) procurements completed by RCTC and found that RCTC did not keep the original score sheets prepared by the selection panel members in two of the four files. Instead of original score sheets RCTC provided 5 30 Riverside County Transportation Commission Incurred Cost Audit a compilation of the scores to support the award of the contract. RCTC stated that they changed their practice of keeping original score sheets because it became difficult to get panel members because panel member candidates stated they did not want to sit on panels if their individual comments and scores could be subject to public disclosure. State and federal regulations require that proper supporting documentation is maintained to support the basis of the award of a contract and compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Original source documents are considered the strongest form of evidence to support an action or decision. By not maintaining the original score sheets RCTC may be unable to support the award of a contract if a dispute arises. In addition, on -call contracts executed did not specify the procedures RCTC would use in awarding task orders among the selected consultants. We were told that the task order work under on -call Right -of -Way Environmental contracts were awarded on a rotation basis when possible, however the on -call contracts did not identified the process to be used to award task order work. We also identified that the contracts for Right -Of -Way Appraisal work had the same issue. Federal regulations require that contract provisions address the specific procedures the contracting agency will use in awarding task or work orders among on -call consultants. In addition, the LAPM states that contracts specify the procedures the agency will use to award/execute task orders among the consultants. By not identifying the process to be used to award work RCTC is in violation of federal regulations and also risks, at a minimum, the appearance that task order work may not be competitively bid, or awarded fairly among the on -call consultants/contractors which could lead to complaints and/or the disallowance of costs. Note: While it was not a requirement at the time these contracts were executed, it is now a requirement in federal regulation (23 CFR 172) and the LAPM to include the method of assigning task orders in the solicitation, e.g. RFP/RFQ. This is reflected in our recommendation. In addition, we found that three of the four procurements files reviewed did not have support that the contractors/consultants were checked for suspension/disbarment. RCTC staff stated that they did verify the suspension/disbarment lists but did not think to print the screen showing the clean reports. See Attachment II for detailed criteria. RECOMMENDATION We recommend the RCTC take the follow actions: • Ensure score sheets are able to support individual scores and are accurately displayed in the compilation. • Update the on -call RFQ/RFP and on -call contract language to include how task order work will be awarded. • Maintain support that contractors/consultants were checked for suspension/disbarment in the procurement files. 6 31 Riverside County Transportation COMMiS,Siell Incurred Cost Audit + Ensure all staff involved in the procurement process are trained and understand the procurement policies and procedures and the LAPM to ensure compliance with state and federal regulations. SUMMARY OF RCTC'S RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF RCTC' S RESPONSE FINDING 3 — Construction Change Orders Lacked Supporting Documentation The RCTC lacks required documentation to support construction, change orders (CCO) based on force account. We reviewed construction contract costs claimed on two projects during our audit: • Skanska for SR 74/I-215 Interchange project + Brutoco for I-215 Blaine project During our audit we identified issues with RCTC's documentation to support costs claimed on 7 out of 17 CCO's tested. We compared the work documented on inspector daily diaries with the work billed by the contractors and found that the daily diaries were missing or the work documented on the daily diaries did not snatch the employees and/or equipment and/or hours billed to the CCOs. All seven CCO's were to be reimbursed based on actual cost, with the method of payment identified as either being force account or time and material. Both construction contracts included compliance with CaWans Standard Specifications. The Standard Specifications on force account (9-1.0A) includes the following, "If the records differ, the Department pays for the work based only on the information shown on the Departments records." Department records being the daily diaries. We asked RCTC why there were differences between the work identified in the daily diaries and the work billed and reimbursed. RCTC stated the, "Tentative Agreement" is used to support payments. for CCO work because that is the only document signed by the contractor and RCTC representatives. According to Caltrans Construction Manual, Tentative Agreements, are documents prepared by the contractor and should be used only to support progress pay estimates_ In addition, we were informed by Caltrans staff that local agencies often use Tentative Agreements incorrectly. Our review of the work identified in the Tentative Agreements was not support by the work identified in the daily diaries, therefore we tools exception to any costs for employees, equipment or hours not reported on RCTC's inspector's daily diaries. Based on our audit we disallowed $26,934 in unsupported extra work costs. For details see Attachment III. See Attachment II for detailed criteria. 7 32 Riverside County Transportation Cpl1 MISSion .Incurred Cost Audit RECOMMENDATION We recommend the RCTC take the following actions: d Reimburse Caltrans the disallowed force account CCO costs of $26,934 identified above. • Use contractor prepared Tentative Agreements only for the purposes of making progress payments. • Ensure that all Tentative Agreements include a statement that the Tentative Agreement is only for progress payment purposes. • Reconcile all force account CCO work claimed by a contractor in their Tentative Agreements with RCTC daily inspection reports and clearly document the disposition of any differences between the two documents. d Ensure force account documentation and payments comply with the Standard Specifications and train staff accordingly. SUMMARY OF RCTC'S RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF RCTC'S RESPONSE FINDING 4 — Required Contract Provisions Were Missing The RCTC was missing required contract provisions in their third party contracts. We reviewed three consulting contracts, two construction contracts, and one service contract entered into by RCTC and found that the consulting and service contracts were missing certain contract provisions required by state and federal regulation, and by agreements between Caltrans and the RCTC. Without required contract provisions the RCTC risks not being able to enforce contract requirernents and may bill costs that are unallowable. Some of the missing required contract provisions include compliance with federal regulations such as 48 CFR Ch. 1 Part 31 and 49 CFR Part 18 (superseded by 2 CFR 200 and 23 CFR 172), the requirement to have an accounting system that accumulates and segregates costs, and that reimbursements for travel and subsistence costs are linvted to the rates in accordance with Department of Personnel Administration regulations. For a detailed list of missing provisions see Attachment IV. See Attachment II for detailed criteria_ RECOMMENDATION We recommend the RCTC update its contract language to ensure that all contract provisions required by state and federal regulations and agreements between the RCTC and Caltrans are included in future contracts, and train staff accordingly. 8 33 Riverside County Transportation Commission Incurred Cost Audit SUMMARY OF RCTC'S RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF RCTC'S RESPONSE 9 34 Audit Universe Disallowed and Questioned Costs Attachment I Projects Audited (January 1, 2012 through September 1, 2015) I-215-Blaine 74/1215 Interchange 71191 Connector Freeway Service Patrol Total Cost Audited Federal Project Number STPLN- 6054(072) STPESPLN- 6054(063) HP21 LN- 6054(066) FSP 15-6054(068) Invoice Selected for Testing: 2r, 3 11, 22 11, 13, 15, 19 2 Total Federal Funds Billed (LA) $725,420 $2,235,447 $550,649 $441,756 $3,953,272 Total Funds Billed $725,420 $2,235,447 $550,649 $441,756 S3,953,272 Unallowable Cost Total Disallowed Cast Finding 1- Contract Management Needs Improvement - - $8,816 - $8,816 Finding 3 — Construction Change Orders Needs Improvement $7,997 $18,937 - - $26,934 Grand Totals $7,997 $1.8,937 $8,816 S4 $35,750 Questioned Cost Total Questioned Cost Finding 1- Contract Management Needs Improvement - - $22,750 - $22,750 Grand Totals $0 $0 $31,566 $0 $58,500 ATTACHMENT II Criteria Finding 1— Contract Management Needs Improvement Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 18.36 (b) (2) states, "Grantees and subgrantees will maintain a contract administration system which ensures that contractors perform in accordance with the temis, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders." Agreement 10-51-071-00 between Riverside County Transportation Commission and Mason & Mason Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants that was entered into on July 27, 2010 (Agreement 10-51-071-00) states in part "3.22.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation including authorized reimbursements, for all Service rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" ..." Agreement 10-51-071-00 Exhibit "C" states "Rates - Year(s) 1-5" Agreement 10-51-071-00 states in part "3.22.2 - Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant." Agreement 10-51-071-00 states in part "3.22.4 - Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by the Commission's Representative. Agreement 12-45-108-00 between Riverside County Transportation Commission and Bernard Arroyo, Exhibit A states in part, "Hours per month —Not to exceed. 20 lours unless, approved in writing by the SAFE's Representative." Agreement No. 11-31-110-00 between Parsons Transportation Group and Riverside County Transportation Commission dated March 14, 2012 (Parsons Agreement), 3.22.1 Compensation: Consultant shall receive compensation including authorized reimbursements, for all services rendered under this agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit C. Parsons Agreement, Exhibit C, 2.2 The Consultant shall notify the Commission in writing prior to a change in the range of rates included herein, and prior to each subsequent change. Parsons Agreement, Exhibit C, 4.2, Charges shall be billed in accordance with the terms and rates included herin, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Commission's Representative. Federal Master Agreement 08-6054R dated October 30, 2006 (Federal Agreement 08-6054R), Article I, Project Administration, Paragraph 9 states, "ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall conform to all State statutes, regulations and procedures (including those set forth in the Local Assistance Procedures Manual and the Local Assistance Program Guidelines, hereafter collectively referred to as "LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROCEDURES') relating to the federal -aid program, all Title 23 federal requirements, and all applicable federal laws, regulations, and policy and procedural or instructional z 36 ATTACHMENT II Criteria memoranda, unless otherwise specifically waived as designated in the executed project -specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT." Local Assistance Program Manual (LAPM), Chapter 10, Section 10.7, Administer the Contract states in part, "Contract administration activities include: monitor progress and compliance with contract requirements ... " 23 CFR 172.9 (b) Payment methods. (1) The method of payment to the consultant shall be set forth in the original solicitation, contract, and in any contract modification thereto. 23 CFR 172.11 (c) Oversight (1) Agency controls. Contracting agencies shall provide reasonable assurance that consultant costs on contracts reiinbursed in whole or in part with FAHP funding are allowable in accordance with the Federal cost principles and consistent with the contract terms considering the contract type and payment method. Finding 2 — Procurement Needs Improvement 49 CFR 18.36 (b) (9) states, "Grantees and subgrantees will maintain records sufficient to detail the significant history of a procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price." May 2013 LAPM: 10.8, Project Records, For audit purposes, project records and documentation shall be kept for three (3 ) years after payment of the final federal or state voucher. Among the records to be retained are as follows: Evaluation and ranking records such as original score sheets from all panel members, short list questions and other documentation. Public Contract Code 10344(c) (2) states, all proposals and all evaluation and scoring sleets shall be available for public inspection at the conclusion of the committee scoring process. 2 CFR 200.302 "(a) Each state must expend and account for the Federal award in accordance with state laws and procedures for expending and accounting for the state's own funds. In addition, the state's and the other non -Federal entity's financial management systems, including records documenting compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award, must be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program, -specific terms and conditions" 23 CFR 172.9 Contracts and administration, (a) (3) On -call or indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ). The solicitation and contract provisions shall address the following requirements:(iv) If multiple consultants are to be selected and multiple on -call or IDIQ contracts awarded through a single solicitation for specific services:(B) Specify the procedures the contracting agency will use in competing and awarding task or work orders among the selected, qualified consultants. 2 37 ATTACHMENT II Criteria 23 CFR 172.7 (a)(1)C;ornpetitive negotiation (qualifications-basedselection)states in part, "contracting agencies shall use the competitive negotiation method for the procurement of engineering and design, related services when FAI-IP funds are involved in the contract, as specified in 23 U.S.C. 112(b)(2)(A). The solicitation, evaluation, ranking, selection, and negotiation shall comply with the qualifications -based selection procurement procedures for architectural and engineering services codified under 40 U.S.C. 1101-1104, commonly referred to as the Brooks Act. (i)Solicitation. Procurement procedures may involve a multiphase process with issuance of a request for statements or letters of interest or qualifications (RFQ) whereby responding consultants are ranked based on qualifications and a RFP is then provided to three or more of the most highly qualified consultants. Regardless of any process utilized for prequalif cation of consultants or for an initial assessment of a consultant's qualifications under a RFQ, a RFP specific to the project, task, or service is required for evaluation of a consultant's specific technical approach and qualifications. 49 CFR 18.35 states, "Grantees and subgrantees must not make any award or permit any award at any tier to any party which is debarred or suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance program." 49 CFR 18.36 (d) (3) (hi) states, `-Grantees and subgranntees will have a method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and for selecting awardees ..." LAPM Chapter 10, Section 10.5, states in part, "The Contract Administrator is responsible for developing the technical criteria, and their relative weights which are used to evaluate and .rank the consultants proposal." RFP No. 10-51-051-00 Section 7.3.1 Evaluation Criteria, Cost (15 points max.) Reasonableness of the total price and competitiveness of this amount with other offers received; adequacy of data in supper of figures quoted; basis on which prices are quoted. Finding 3 — Construction Change Orders Needs Improvement Caltrans Construction Manual 3-9038 — Force Account Records states in part, "On daily reports, record observations and inspections of extra work in progress in sufficient detail to provide a reasonable basis for agreement on payment. Records must be original, not a copy from other documents." Caltrans Standard Specification 2010 Force Account -- General 9-1.04A states in part, "If the records differ, the Department pays for the work based only on the information shown on the Department records." LAPM, Chapter 15, section 16.7 states in part, "The Daily Reports shall record the hours worked by men and equipment ..." 3 38 ATTACHMENT IT Criteria Finding 4 — Contract Provisions Need Improvement 49 CFR 18.20 (b) (3) states, "Effective control and accountability must be maintained for all grant and subgrant cash, real and personal property, and other assets". 49 CFR 18.36 (b) (2) states, "Grantees and subgrantees will maintain a contract administration system which ensures that contractors perform in accordance with the terns, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders". 2 CFR 225, Appendix A, Section A.2 states in part "governmental units are responsible for the efficient and effective administration of Federal awards through the application of sound management practices.... and assume responsibility for administering Federal funds in a manner consistent with underlying agreements, program objectives, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award." Federal Agreement 08-6054R Article I Paragraph 9 states in part, "ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall conform to all State statutes, regulations and procedures (including those set forth in Local Assistance Procedures Manual and the Local Assistance Program Guidelines, hereafter collectively referred to as "Local Assistance Procedures") relating to the federal -aid program, all Title 23 federal requirements, and all applicable federal laws, regulations, and policy and procedural or instructional memoranda...". Furthermore Article V Paragraph 7 states, "Arty subcontract entered into by the Administering agency as a result of this agreement shall contain all of the provisions of Article IV, Fiscal Provisions, and this Article V, Audits, Third -Party Contracting Records Retention and Reports, shall mandate that travel and per -diem reimbursements and third -party contract reimbursements to subcontractors will be allowable as project costs only after those costs are incurred and paid for by the contractors." Provisions included in Article IV and V that are required to be in subcontracts include: • Article IV, Paragraph 5 "Invoices shall be submitted on Administering Agency letterhead that includes the address of Administering Agency and shall be formatted in accordance with Local Assistance Procedures." • Article IV, Paragraphs 17 "Payments to ADMINISTERING AGENCY for PROTECT -related travel and subsistence (per diem) expenses of ADMINISTERING AGENCY forces and its contractors and subcontractors claimed for reimbursement or as local match shall not exceed rates authorized to be paid to rank and file State employees under current State Department of Personnel Administration (DPA) rules..." • Article V Paragraph 2, "ADMINISTERING .AGENCY, its contractors and subcontractors shall establish and maintain an accounting system and records that properly accumulate and segregate incurred PROJECT costs and matching funds by line item for the PROJECT. The accounting system of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractors and all subcontracts 4 39 ATTACHMENT II Criteria shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion and provide support for reimbursement payment vouchers or invoices sent to or paid by STATE." LAPM Exhibit 10-R, Article V, (G) & (H) states in part, "Final invoice must contain the final cost and all credits due the LOCAL AGENCY including any equipment purchased under the provisions of Article XVI Equipment Purchase of this contract." (H) "The total amount payable by the LOCAL AGENCY including the fixed fee shall not exceed $(Amount)," Fund Transfer Agreement 15-45-027-00 dated 7/1/14, Section II 10.13) Any subcontract or agreement entered into by ADMINISTRATERING AGENCY as a result of disbursing Funds received pursuant to this Agreement shall contain all of the fiscal provision (Section II, Paragraphs 9, 11, 12 & 13) of this Agreement; and shall mandate that travel and per diem reimbursements and third -party contract reimbursements to subcontractors will be allowable as project costs only after those costs are incurred and paid for by the subcontractors. Fund Transfer Agreement 15-45-027-00 dated 7/1/14, (FTA 15-45-027-00) Section II (9)(B) states, "ADMINISTERING AGENCY will assure that its Fund recipients will be obligated to agree that (1.) Contract Cost Principles and. Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31 , et seq., shall be used to determine the allowability of individual PROJECT cost items, and (2.) those parties shall comply with Federal administrative procedures in accordance with 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. Every sub -recipient receiving Funds as a contractor or sub -contractor under this Agreement shall comply with Federal administrative procedures in accordance with 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. FTA 15-45-027-00, Section II (13) states, "Payments to Administering Agency for travel and subsistence expenses of Administering Agency forces and its subcontractors claimed for reimbursement or applied as local match credit shall not exceed rates authorized to be paid exempt non -represented State employees under current State Department of Personnel Administration rules." FTA 15-45-027-00, Section II (11) states, "Administering Agency, its contractors and subcontractors shall establish and .maintain an accounting system and records that properly accumulate and segregate Fund expenditures by line item for the project. The accounting system of Administering Agency, its contractors, and all subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles." 5 40 ATTACHMENT III List of Constrict Provision Exceptions X = Contract Provision Missing from Contract Consultant Contracts Project Name: SR71I91 Connector SR71191 Connector SR71191 Connector Freeway Service Patrol Project Number: 1-113L21 LN-6054(066) 11P1,21 LN-6054(066) 1-T1,21 LN-6054(066) FSP 15-6054(068) Contractor: Parsons Tetra Tech Mason & Mason Tri-City Towing Travel reimbursed at state Department of Personnel Administration rules X X X X Accounting system must conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles X X X X Accounting System must accumulate and segregate project costs. X X X X Comply with 48 CFR, Ch. 1, Part 31 and 49 CFR, Part 18 * X Invoices on letterhead with current address X X X Equipment Clause X X X * Please note that 49 CFR Part 18 has been superceeded by 2 CFR 200 41 Attachment IV CCO Disallowed Costs Federal Aid Project Number Contractor CCO # Date Mange Disallowed Cost STPLN-6054(072) Brutoco 1 6/11/2013 $ 711 STPLN-6054(072) Bnitoco 1 6/12/2013 $ 996 STPLN-6054(072) Brutoco 1 6/13/2013 $ 1,327 STPLN-6054(072) Brutoco 1 6/14/2013 S 779 STPLN-6054(072) Brutoco 1 6/17/2013 $ 1,120 STPLN-6054(072) Brutoco 1 6/19/2013 $ 302 STPLN-6054(072) Brutoco l 6/21/2013 $ 611 STPLN-6054(072) Brutoco 1 8/26/2013 $ 1,152 STPLN-6054(072) Brutoco 1 6/18/2613 $ 998 Total Brutoco CCO #1 Disallowed Cost $ 7,997 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 21 3/19/2012 $ 51 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 21 3/2/2012 $ 507 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 21 2/15/2012 $ 230 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 21 2/21/2012 $ 304 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 21 12/30/2011 $ 401 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 21 1/20/2012 $ 173 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 21 II/29/2011 $ 126 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 21 12/9/2011 $ 1,663 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 2 ] 12/12/2011 $ 102 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 21 12/13/2011 $ 305 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 21 ] 1i9/2011 $ 173 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 21 11/10/2011 $ 994 STPESPLN-6054(00) Skanska 21 11/15/2011 $ 152 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 21 7/13/2011 $ 670 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 21 7/14/2011 $ 1,551 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 21 7/15/2011 $ 1,231 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 2I 7/18/2011 $ 130 Total Skanska CCO #21 Disallowed Costs $ 3,163 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 27 4/19/2011 $ 47 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 27 4/4/2011 $ 414 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 27 4/5/2011 $ 218 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 27 4/6/2011 $ 145 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 27 2/14/2011 $ 2,410 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 27 2/28/2011 $ 163 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 27 3/1/2011 $ 413 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 27 3/1/2011 $ 94 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 27 3/3/2011 $ 94 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 27 3/4/2011 $ 3,689 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 27 3/14/2011 $ 47 Total Skanska CCO #27 Disallowed Costs 5 7,736 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 55 1/19/2012 Total Skanska CCO 455 Disallowed Costs S 812 812 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 72 7/29/2011 $ 1,223 STPESPLN-6054(063) Skanska 72 2/21/2012 $ 554 ISTPESPLN-6054(063) Total Skanska CCO #72 Disallowed Costs $ 1,777 Skanska 747 10/10/2012 $ Total Skanska CCO #74 Disallowed Costs S STPESPLN-6054(063) 1Skanska 75 Total Skanska CCO #75 Disallowed Costs Total Skanska CCO Disallowed Costs 355 355 10/ 16/2014 $ 93 93 18,937 Total Brutoco & Skanska Disallowed CCO Costs S 26,934 42 ATTACHMENT 2 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor • Riverside, CA 92501 Mailing Address: P. O. Box 12008 • Riverside, CA 92502-2208 (951) 787-7141 • Fax (951) 787-7920 • www.rctc.org MEE— Riverside County Transportation Commission June 6, 2017 Ms. MarSue Morrill, CPA Chief, External Audits —Local Governments California Department of Transportation Audits and Investigations—MS2 P.O. Box 942874 Sacramento, CA 94274-0001 Subject: Response to Riverside County Transportation Commission Incurred Cost Audit Draft Report Dear Ms. Morrill: On May 8, 2017, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Audits and Investigations conducted a formal exit conference to discuss the draft Incurred Cost Audit Report findings and recommendations. Enclosed is the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) response to each of the following four findings discussed in the draft report: 1. Contract Management Needs Improvement 2. Documentation and Administration of Procurement Needs Improvement 3. Construction Change Orders Lacked Supporting Documentation 4. Required Contract Provisions Were Missing I understand that RCTC's response will be incorporated into the final audit report. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Michele Cisneros at mcisneros@rctc.org or Theresia Trevino at ttrevino@rctc.org or at (951) 787-7141. S' cerely, `aP(t/ ne Mayer ; Executive Director c: Cliff Vose, Audit Manager, Caltrans Lisa Moreno, Auditor, Caltrans 43 Response to California Department of Transportation Incurred Cost Audit Findings 1, 2, 3 and 4 Response to Finding 1 — Contract Management Needs Improvement RCTC concurs with the findings that RCTC was billed for interns not listed on the cost proposal for one contract and for costs related to two contracts that were not in accordance with certain terms and conditions of the contracts. While RCTC provided verbal approval for the additional classification, changes in rates and maximum number of hours, and the change in basis of payment from an hourly rate to a flat fee, written approval should have been provided in accordance with the contracts. RCTC's Procurement Department will conduct a training update for staff and program management consultants regarding proper contract management as per RCTC's Procurement Policy Manual and related procedures, including a proper understanding of and adherence to all contract terms and maintenance of written documentation to support any changes to contracts. In regard to the disallowed costs of at least $8,816 related to interns and the questioned costs of $22,750 related appraisal services costs not in accordance with the terms and conditions, RCTC asserts that the costs billed were reasonable and appropriate based on the services performed. Therefore, RCTC desires to negotiate with Caltrans the reimbursement of any of these costs. Response to Finding 2 — Documentation and Administration of Procurements Need Improvement RCTC concurs with the findings that original evaluation score sheets were not maintained for two procurements although scoring results were available electronically, certain right of way on -call contracts did not specify the procedures to be used in awarding task orders, and documentation was not maintained to support suspension/debarment checks performed. Since the inception of the Procurement Department in 2009, RCTC has continuously updated the RCTC Procurement Policy Manual and related procedures based on program reviews and audits, changes in laws and regulations, and best practices. Changes have already been implemented in regard to the documentation and administration of procurements findings. To ensure proper supporting evaluation documentation is maintained to support contract awards, the electronic spreadsheet compilation of individual and total evaluation scores is printed and signed by all evaluation panel member as evidence of the final scoring. Procurements for on -call consultants include the method of assigning task orders under such solicitations that will be included in the contracts. Additionally, RCTC maintains screenshots pertaining to suspension/debarment checks for contractors. While it has been RCTC's practice to require consultants to complete suspension/debarment forms as part of their proposals, RCTC will verify such certifications and maintain documentation of the check. Response to Finding 3 — Construction Change Orders Lacked Supporting Documentation Finding 3 states that "RCTC lacks required documentation to support construction change orders (CCO) based on force account." RCTC believes that this statement is overly broad and misrepresents the facts. As an example, RCTC administered over $1.6 million of work on the Brutoco contract, of which approximately $76,000 was performed on a force account basis. The incurred cost audit identified disallowed costs of $7,997.21 for the Brutoco contract, which represents 0.49% of the total construction 44 cost. For the Skanska contract, the results are similar. Furthermore, RCTC disagrees that the required documentation is lacking in every case except for two invoices. The audit report states, "We compared the work documented on inspector daily diaries with the work billed by the contractors and found that the daily diaries were missing or the work documented on the daily diaries did not match the employees and/or equipment and/or hours billed to the CCOs." RCTC's review of the records revealed that there were no missing diaries; however, there was one incorrectly - dated diary. As to the comment that daily diaries did not match the hours billed to the CCOs, our response is as follows: The audit report states, "The Standard Specifications on force account (9-1.0A) includes the following, 'If the records differ, the Department pays for the work based only on the information shown on the Department's records.' Department records being the daily diaries." RCTC believes that the last sentence is an interpretation of the standard specifications, and RCTC disagrees with such interpretation. RCTC asserts that the term "Department records" does not necessarily refer only to daily diaries; it can also refer to tentative agreements when they are signed by the inspector. Per Section 3-904B (3) of the Caltrans construction manual, the guidance is "Compare extra work bills against daily extra work reports and tentative agreements, if they are used" (emphasis added). It is inconsistent to compare extra work bills against the tentative agreements if they are then not considered department records. In every contract change order (CCO) tested, there are tentative agreements in the file which cover the extra work at force account that are signed by the contractor's representative and the inspector. RCTC analyzed the records for all of the CCOs tested and found that what occurred can be categorized into four general categories: 1. In most cases, the discrepancies between the daily diaries and the extra work bills are similar. Some equipment or employee hours paid were not shown on the diaries but were shown on the tentative agreements. In these cases, the resident engineer agreed that the contractor was due payment for all the time shown on the tentative agreements. Ideally, the additional time should have been documented by adding a note to the diaries; we believe that this constitutes a minor discrepancy, and should not result in a disallowance of the charges. However, if the auditors disagree with this statement, and even if they also disagree with the statement above regarding the use of tentative agreements being department records, RCTC disagrees with the finding that 100% of the charges for all the extra work performed on these days should be disallowed. Only the amounts not shown on the daily diaries should be disallowed. 2. In several cases, the daily diaries describe the work but incorrectly include the work under a bid item (e.g., Site Management) instead of extra work at force account. However, the work was fully documented in the diaries as extra work at force account and paid at the documented hours for equipment and personnel. This discrepancy exists on the Skanska contract CCO No. 21, reports 398-400, 430, and 492. RCTC disagrees that the charges incorrectly identified as a bid item should be disallowed. 3. On two reports for the Skanska contract CCO No. 72, the diaries describe CCO work that was paid for by agreed price, not extra work at force account. Therefore, the test applied to these reports comparing the daily diaries to the amounts paid on the CCO does not apply and none of these costs should be disallowed. 4. In two cases on the Skanska contract, CCOs No. 74 and 75, there are discrepancies between the diaries and the extra work bills that cannot be explained. The value of these disallowed costs is $448.36; and RCTC concurs that these are disallowed costs. 45 The detailed analysis performed by RCTC and its capital project program management consultant is attached. Response to Finding 4 — Required Contract Provisions Were Missing We concur with the finding that certain contract provisions as required by state and federal regulations and state agreements were missing from a few of the consultant and service contracts reviewed. While some of the contracts had similar language for some of the provisions, they did not include the verbatim state and federally required language. As noted in the response to Finding 2, RCTC continuously updates its procurement policies and procedures. Procurement staff will work with its general legal counsel to update agreement templates and future agreements to include language for specific contract provisions required by state and federal regulations and agreements with Caltrans. As part of the Procurement Department training discussed in the response to Finding 1, state and federal requirements in contracts will also be reviewed to ensure that staff are familiar with such requirements in order to properly manage contracts. 46 Contractor CCO 4 Report 4 Date Range Amount Reimbursed Equipment charged Material/Ve ndor charged Regular Labor Premium V V (OT) Labor Percentage Billed Questioned Amount Comments Skanska 21 208 7/13/2011 $ 670.18 $ 170.80 $ 272.12 S 521.83 $ 32.73 50% $ 670.18 Inspection reporton does not show work done CCO 21 Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Daily Report does not mention the CCO work. Skanska 21 210 7/14/2011 $ 1,551.17 $ 573.23 $ 221.00 $ 1,39532 $ 65.45 50% $ 1,555.16 Inspection report does not show work done on CCO 21. RCiC did not have an invoice to support the actual cost of the rental equipment from Suntrust. Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Daily Report does not mention the CCO work There is an invoice from the same rental company for the same rental equipment from December 2016 for an earlier extra work bill for the same CCO. The contractor submitted a quote (not invoice) this time asking the same rate. Skanska 21 211 7/15/2011 $ 1,231.45 $ 250.23 $ 81.00 5 1,323.91 $ 65.+5 50% $ 1,231.44 No inspectors report. ROTC also did not have an invoice from Suntrust for the actual cos[ of the rental equipment. Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Daily Report does not mention the CCO work There is an invoice from the same rental company for the same rental equipment from December 2016 for an earlier extra work bill for the same CCO. The contractor submitted a quote (not invoice) this time asking the same rate. Skanska 21 212 7/18/2011 $ 130.19 $ 42.70 $ 140.99 50% $ 130.19 Inspection report does not show work done on CCO 21 Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Daily Report does not mention the CCO wort: Skanska 21 368 11/9/2011 $ 172.61 $ 42.7019ZGC 50% $ 172.60 Inspection report does not show work on CCO 21 Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Daily Report does not mention the CCO work or Tentative Agreement. However, the Tentative Agreement is attached to the daily report. Skanska 21 371 11/10/2011 $ 993.74 $ 339.06 $ 1,066.10 50% $ 993.73 Inspection report does not show work done on CCO 21 Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Daily Report does not mention the CCO work or Tentative Agreement. However, the Tentative Agreement is attached to the daily report. Skanska 21 372 11/15/2011 $ 152.09 $ 74.09 5 146.13 50% $ 152.09 Inspection report does not show work done on CCO 21 Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Daily Report does not mention the CCO work or Tentative Agreement However, the Tentative Agreement is attached to the daily report. Skanska 21 390 11/29/2011 $ 273.86 $ 95.44 $ 94.66 50% $ 125.80 Inspection report does not show work done on CCO 21. Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. The work is reported in the Daily Report. The Daily Report refers to wrong CCO number but describes CCO 21 work. The Tentative p g Agreement is attached to the daily report. V Skanska 21 398 12/9/2011 $ 1,062.98 $ 334.04 $ 197.50 $ 1,010.80 50% $ 1,062.98 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) work done under Rem 2. Labor hours/materials/trucks do not match. Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. The inspector made a mistake and reported SWPPP maintenance under Site Management bid item. The report states "Swppp maintenance" which is CCO 21 work not Site Management. The same inspector signed the Tentative Agreement. The Tentative Agreement is attached to the Daily Report. Skanska 21 399 12/12/2011 $ 101.68 $ 42.70 $ 102.94 50% $ 101.68 SWPPP work done under Rem 2. tabor hours/equipment don't match Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. The inspector made a mistake and reported SWPPP maintenance under Site Management bid item. The report states "Swppp maintenance" which is CCO 21 work not Site Management. The same inspector signed the Tentative Agreement. The Tentative Agreement is attached to the Daily Report. Skanska 21 400 12/13/2011 $ 305.05 $ 128.10 $ 308.82 50% $ 305.04 SWPPP work done under item 2. Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. The inspector made a mistake and reported SWPPP maintenance under Site Management bid item. The report states "Swppp maintenance" which is CCO 21 work not Site Management. The same inspector signed the Tentative Agreement. The Tentative Agreement is attached to the Daily Report. Skanska 21 430 1/20/2012 $ 172.61 $ 42.70 $ 197.60 50% $ 172.60 No inspection report Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. The inspector made a mistake and reported SWPPP maintenance under Site Management bid item. The report states "Swppp maintenance" which is CCO 21 work not Site Management. The same inspector signed the Tentative Agreement. The Tentative Agreement is attached to the daily report. Skanska 21 433 12/30/2011 $ 400.68 $ 190.88 5 338.28 50% $ 400.67 Inspection report does not show work done on CCO 21 Payment made based on Tentative Agreement The daily report does show CCO 21 work done. Skanska 21 492 2/21/2012 $ 304.39 $ 143.16 296.40 50% 5 304.39 Inspection report does not show work done on CCO 21 Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. The inspector made a mistake and reported SWPPP maintenance under She Management bid Rem. The report states "Swppp maintenance" which is CCO 21 work not Site Management. The same inspector signed the Tentative Agreement. Skanska 21 493 2/15/2012 $ 230.19 $ 95.44 $ 47.40 $ 197.60 50% $ 230.18 Inspection report does not show work done on CCO 21 Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Skanska 21 512 3/19/2012 $ 458.06 $ 68.51 50% $ 51.33 1 hour overtime not on inspectors journal Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Skanska 21 517 3/2/2012 $ 507.33 $ 238.60 5 494.00 50% $ 507.32 No inspector's Journal and support documents show date as either 3/2/12 or 3/19/12 Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. $ 8,718.26 $ 8,163.42 Disallowed / Questioned amounts Contractor CCO # Report # Date Range Amount Reimbursed Equipment charged Material/ Vendor charged Regular Labor Premium (OT) Labor Percentage Billed Questioned Amount Comments Skanska 27 79 2/14/2011 $ 2,410.16 $ 738.05 $ 959.52 $ 82.45 100% $ 2,410.15 No inspection report Payment made based on Tentative Agreement The work was performed on 2-28-11, the Assistant Resident Engineer (RE) used wrong date on her report The Daily Report for 2-28-11 describes this work. Daily Report refers to attached Tentative Agreement for details. Tentative Agreement is part of Daily Report. Skanska 27 80 2/28/2031 $ 2,584.12 $ 59.64 $ 62.97 100% $ 162.95 Over time and air compressor not documented in the field Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Daily Report describes CCO 27 work. Daily Report refers to Attached Tentative Agreement for details. Tentative Agreement is part of Daily Report. Skanska 27 81 3/1/2011 $ 2,578.02 $ 234.20 $ 41.23 100% $ 412.73 Paul Parker and overtime not on ins pection report Payment made based on Tentative Agreement Paul Parker is on the Tentative Agreement Daily Report describes CCO 27 work Daily Report refers to attached Tentative Agreement for details. Tentative Agreement is part of Daily Report Skanska 27 82 3/1/2011 $ 1,913.00 $ 62.97 100% $ 94.36 No overtime on inspection report Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Daily Report describes CCO 27 work. Daily Report refers to attached Tentative Agreement for details. Tentative Agreement is part of Daily Report. Skanska 27 85 3/3/2011 $ 2,927.58 $ 62.97 100% $ 94.36 No overtime on inspection report Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Daily Report describes CCO 27 work. Daily Report refers to attached Tentative Agreement for details. Tentative Agreement is part of Daily Report Skanska 27 87 3/4/2011 $ 3,689.26 $ 430.80 $ 2,048-91 $ 82.45 100% $ 3,689 26 No record of work on inspector's log Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Hours are not recorded on the Daily Report but the Daily Report describes CCO 27 work Daily Report refers to attached Tentative Agreement for details. Tentative Agreement is part of Daily Report Skanska 27 100 3/14/2011 $ 838.73 $ 31.49 100% 5 47.19 No over time on inspection report Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Hours recorded on the Daily Report are more than hours agreed on the Tentative Agreement. The Daily Report describes CCO 27 work Daily Report refers to attached Tentative Agreement for details. Tentative Agreement is part of Daily Report. CO Skanska 27 122 4/4/2011 $ 5,21751 j 170.50 $ 145.42 300% $ 414.33 1 hour over time for Garcia and Padilla not on inspection report. F250 740127 charged to item 76 on inspector report, CAT loaders charged less than inspection report shows Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Daily Report describes CCO 27 work Daily ReDOrt refers to attached Tentative Agreement for details. Tentative Agreement is part of Daily Report. Skanska 27 125 4/5/2011 $ 4,318.31 $ 145.4' 100% $ 217.91 No over time on inspection report Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Daily Report describes CCO 27 work. Daily Report refers to attached Tentative Agreement for details. Tentative Agreement is part of Daily Report Skanska 27 128 4/6/2011 $ 817.54 $ 85.40 $ 31.49 100% $ 145.40 Over time not recorded on inspection report and truck recorded to line item SOS Payment made based on Tentative Agreement Daily Report describes CCO 27 work. The Daily report shows 4 identical trucks (all F250's) 2 used on the CCO work The inspector happened to mark wrong truck to the wrong item, a clear typo. Daily Report shows more labor hours and more equipment used for the CCO work than the Tentative Agreement. Daily Report refers to attached Tentative Agreement for details. Tentative Agreement is part of Daily Report. Skanska 27 137 4J19/2011 $ 31.49 S00% $ 47.19 No premium time on inspector's log Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. Daily Report describes CCO 27 work. Daily Report refers to attached Tentative Agreement for details. Tentative Agreement is part of Daily Report. $ 27,294.23 $ 7,735.83 Disallowed / Questioned amounts Contractor CCO # Report # Date Range Amount Reimbursed Equipment charged Material/ vendor charged Regular Labor Premium (OT) Labor Percentage Billed Questioned Amount Comments Skanska 55 439 1/19/2012 $ 811.71 $ 190.88 $ 395.20 100% $ 811.72 Inspection report shows different people, hours, and equipment on CCO 55 Payment made based on Tentative Agreement. The Daily Report describes CCO 55 work. The hours on the Daily Report does not match with the Tentative Agreement. Skanska 72 21 7/29/2011 $ 1,223.37 $ 505.55 $ - $ 428.42 $ - 100% $ 1,223.37 No inspector's log that show work on CCO 72 CCO 72 is not an EW - FA CCO. It is EW - agreed lumpsum. Skanska 72 22 2/21/2012 $ 553.88 $ 85.40 $ 220.06 $ 84.02 100/0o $ 553.87 Inspection report does not show work done on CCO 72 CCO 72 is not an EW - FA CCO. It is EW - agreed lumpsum. Skanska 74 544 10/10/2012 $ 10,562.43 $ 68.72 $ - $ - $ 184.38 100% $ 355.32 No over time on inspection report and only hours for equipment. One document states worked 8 am to 2 pm = 6 hours Discrepancy between Diary Report and extra work bill. Skanska 75 547 10/16/2012 $ 507.40 $ 19.98 $ 45.93 100% $ 93.04 Only 3 hours on inspection report; charged 4 hours Discrepancy between Diary Report and extra work bill. $ 13,658.79 LC) $ 3,037.33 Disallowed costs - costs not supported by RCTC daily inspection reports Federal Aid Project Number Contractor CCO # PPE No: Date Range Amount Reimbursed Equipment charged Material/Vendor charged Regular Labor Premium (OT) Labor Questioned Amount Cost supported by Daily Inspection Reports Revised Questioned Amount Comments Response STPW-6054(072) Brutoco 1 1 6/11/2013 $ 1,269.75 $ 417.94 $ 92.41 $ 60.39 $ 710.85 $ 302.68 $ 408.17 Daily Diaries did not match extra work bill. Payment based on Tentative Agreement. Auditor is rejecting all equipment costs. The Daily Report shows 8 hrs fora truck which is ignored by the auditor. The equipment cost for this extra work bill should have been $302.68 based on Daily Report The "Questinoned Amount" should have been $408.17 STPW-6054(072) Brutoco 1 1 6/12/2013 $ 1,352.79 $ 389.31 $ 240.40 $ 123.33 $ 996.00 $ 170.14 $ 825.86 Daily Diaries did not match extra work bill. Payment based on Tentative Agreement The Ddaily Report shows 8 hours for a truck The auditor is accepting 2.5 hours shown on the Tentative Agreement for the same truck instead of 8 hours on the Daily Report.The equipment cost for this extra work bill should be increased $170.14 based on the Daily Report. The "Questinoned Amount" should have been $825.86 STPW-6054(072) Brutoco 1 1 6/13/2013 $ 1,684.17 $ 451.60 $ 287.43 $ 249.21 S 1,327.38 $ 170.14 $ 1,157.24 Daily Diaries did not match extra work bill. Payment based on Tentative Agreement. The daily report shows 8 hours for a truck The auditor is accepting 2.5 hours shown on the Tentative Agreement for the same truck instead of 8 hrs on the Dairy Report.The equipment cost for this extra work bill should be increased $170.14 based on daily report. The "Questinoned Amount" should have been $1,157.24 STPLN-6054(072) Brutoco 1 1 6/14/2013 $ 1,338.05 $ 434.52 > 184.82 $ 779.15 $ 302.68 $ 476.47 Daily Diaries did not match extra work bill. Payment based on Tentative Agreement. Auditor is rejecting all equipment costs. The Daily Report shows 8 hrs for a truck which is ignored by the auditor. The equipment cost for this extra work bill should have been $302.68 based on Daily Report. The "Questinoned Amount" should have been $476.47 Brutoco Bruto 1 3 6/17/2013 $ 1,679.06 $ 530.88 I 2:723 $ 60.39 $ 1,120.18 $ 302.68 $ 817.50 Daily Diaries did not match extra work bill. Payment based on Tentative Agreement. Auditor is rejecting all equipment costs. The Daily Report shows 8 hours for a truck which is ignored by the auditor. The equipment cost for this extra work bill should have been $302.68 based on Daily Report. The "Questinoned Amount" should have been $817.50 SkR.N-6054(072) 0 Brutoco 1 4 6/19/2013 $ 1,732.46 $ 184.04 I $ 60.39 $ 302.14 $ 61.87 $ 240.27 Daily Diaries did not match extra work bill. Payment based on Tentative Agreement. Auditor is rejecting all equipment costs. The Daily Report shows 2 hours for a truck which is ignored by the auditor. The equipment cost for this extra work bill should have been $61.87 based on Daily Report. The "Questinoned Amount" should have been $240.27 STPLN-6054(072) Brutoco 1 4 6/21/2013 $ 1,978.85 S 279.42 191.62 $ 611.06 $ - $ 611.06 Daily Diaries did not match extra work bill. Payment based on Tentative Agreement. Auditor is using Daily Report hours only. STPW-6054(072) Brutoco 1 4 8/26/2013 $ 1,152.31 $ 90.43 $ 581.00 $ 182.15 $ 1,152.31 $ 1,208.54 $ (56.23) No Daily Diary Daily Report is on file. Payment based on Tentative Agreement Based on the hours on the Daily Report the contractor is entitled for a payment of $1,204.54. The RE paid $1,152.31. The "Questinoned Amount" should have been $56.23. STPLN-6054(072) Brutoco 1 4 6/18/2013 $ 2,477.49 $ 503.46 $ 277.23 $ 998.15 $ 302.68 $ 695.47 Daily Diaries did not match extra work bill. Payment based on Tentative Agreement. Auditor is rejecting all equipment costs. The Daily Report shows 8 hours for a truck which is ignored by the auditor. The equipment cost for this extra work bill should have been $302.68 based on Daily Report. The "Questinoned Amount" should have been $695.47 Auditor's Numbers - total billed amount from CCO's % of exception to total billed R,nC's Numbers* $ 14,664.93 17.57% $ 45,508.06 total billed amount from CCO's $ 50,006.19 %of exception to total billed 10.35% $ 7,997.21 $ 2,821.41 $ 5,175.80 AGENDA ITEM 7B RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Audit Ad Hoc Committee Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2015/16 Transportation Development Act and Measure A Audit Results AUDIT AD HOC COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Transportation Development Act (TDA) and Measure A audit results report for Fiscal Year 2015/16. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In July 2016, following a competitive procurement, Macias Gini O'Connell LLP (MGO), was selected to perform the financial and compliance audits and agreed -upon procedures (audits) for Western County TDA claimants and Measure A; BCA Watson Rice LLP (BCAWR) was selected to perform the Western County Measure A Specialized Transit recipients audits; and Conrad LLP (Conrad) was selected to perform the Coachella Valley, Palo Verde Valley, and county of Riverside TDA claimants and Measure A recipient audits, except for the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine), and the city of Beaumont (Beaumont). The RTA and SunLine audits were completed by their respective auditors; Beaumont's audit has not been issued. The city of Menifee's (Menifee) audit is still in process due to a system failure that caused a delay in the availability of its data. The FY 2015/16 audits represent the first year of a new five-year contract term that MGO, BCAWR, and Conrad performed these audits for the Commission. MGO and BCAWR performed similar audits in connection with prior agreements. The firms and the other agencies' auditors completed the audits and issued the audit reports, except for Beaumont and Menifee, which audits are pending. The following is a summary of the 54 audits performed (excluding Beaumont and Menifee): Agenda Item 7B 51 Funding Type Type of Procedure MGO (Western County) BCAWR (Western County) Conrad(Eastern County & Riv. Co.) Other Auditors Total TDA Article 3 (bicycle and pedestrian projects) TDA Article 4 (transit) Measure A specialized transit Measure A local streets and roads Financial and compliance audit Financial and compliance audit Agreed -upon procedures Agreed -upon procedures 5 0 2 0 7 3 0 1 2 6 0 14 0 0 14 16 0 11 0 27 Based on a review of the reports, the following items are highlights of the results of these audits. Staff will follow up on matters noted as necessary and the completion of the Beaumont transit audit and Menifee Measure A local streets and road agreed -upon procedures. TDA Article 3 (Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects) • Two jurisdictions — the cities of Cathedral City and Corona — had fund balances as of June 30, 2015, aggregating approximately $217. These cities had no new activity in the current year; therefore, no audits were conducted. However, staff will continue to monitor these balances and work with the respective jurisdictions to ensure such fund balances are cleared appropriately. TDA Article 4 (Transit) • All transit operators with completed audits met the fare ratio requirement. For Beaumont, all TDA disbursements have been suspended as of April 1, since the audit has not been completed. Disbursements will resume upon receipt of the audit report. • One transit operator, city of Banning restated its beginning net position as a result of prior period adjustments in the amount of $1,535,380, related to a restatement of the net pension obligation due to the implementation of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions — An Amendment of GASB Statement No. 27. • The report on compliance and internal control related to federal awards for SunLine included one compliance finding related to monitoring and reporting program performance. Management submitted to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) a written policy regarding the preparation and submission of required reports and has been in communication with FTA to ensure future reports are submitted to the satisfaction of the FTA. • The report on the status of a prior year SunLine finding related to subrecipient monitoring indicated the matter had been resolved. Agenda Item 7B 52 Measure A Specialized Transit • All agencies met or substantially met total match requirements, including requirements that were adjusted based on partial Measure A. • Two agencies — Care -A -Van and Riverside County Regional Medical Center — receiving Measure A and federal funds did not have certain written policies required by the federal funds; however, no instances of noncompliance were noted. • One agency, Independent Living Partnership, had net assets of $1,240 as of June 30, 2016, related to year-end expense adjustments for which Measure A reimbursements were received in prior months. The agency intends to request authorization to carryover these funds to FY 2016/17. • One agency, Inland Aids Project (Inland Aids), had net assets of $7,548 as of June 30, 2016, related to a reimbursement for a vehicle that was claimed for reimbursement but had not been purchased during the fiscal year. Inland Aids ceased operations around March 2017. The Commission's auditor was unable to perform close-out agreed -upon procedures for FY 2016/17 as requested by the Commission. Therefore, the Commission has suspended payments for any unreimbursed FY 2016/17 program costs until such procedures can be completed. It is uncertain if the Commission will be able to recover the $7,548 in excess reimbursements to Inland Aids in FY 2015/16; however, Inland Aids did not submit an invoice for two months of operations in an amount of approximately $9,600. Should Inland Aids seek reimbursement of such costs and agree to the close-out agreed -upon procedures, any reimbursements would be offset by the FY 2015/16 excess reimbursements. Measure A Local Streets and Roads • Three jurisdictions — the cities of Blythe, Murrieta, and San Jacinto — met their maintenance of effort (MOE) requirements using the prior year carryover, as permitted under the MOE Guidelines. • Six jurisdictions —the cities of Eastvale, Murrieta, Norco, Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, and San Jacinto — have fund balances in excess of three years of revenues. The Commission policy suggests such amounts should not exceed three years. • Two jurisdictions — the city of Calimesa and the county of Riverside — recorded overhead costs in excess of 8 percent of revenues. The Commission's policy states overhead should not exceed 8 percent of revenues; however, the county of Riverside's overhead allocation is based on an approved indirect cost rate. • Two jurisdictions — the cities of Cathedral City and San Jacinto — expended Measure A funds on indirect costs that were not included on the approved five-year capital improvement plans (CIPs). The jurisdictions may be required to amend their CIPs. Attached is the summary of transportation and transit fund operations and related audit results for the various types ofTDA (Articles 3 and 4) and Measure A (specialized transit and local streets and roads) funding. Each schedule provides information for each claimant and recipient regarding the revenues, expenditures/expenses, and change in fund balance/net assets for the year ended June 30, 2016, and other financial and compliance information. Agenda Item 7B 53 Attachments: 1) FY 2015/16 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Schedule 2) FY 2015/16 Transportation Development Act Article 4 Schedule 3) FY 2015/16 Measure A Specialized Transit Schedule 4) FY 2015/16 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Schedule Agenda Item 7B 54 ATTACHMENT 1 Cathedral Transportation Development Act Article 3 Schedule Year Ended June 30, 2016 Lake County of Banning City* Corona* Hemet Indio Elsinore Riverside Wildomar Riverside Revenues: Intergovernmental allocations: Article 3 $ - $ - $ 119,620 $ - $ 165,059 $ - $ Interest income - - 12 - - - Total revenues - - - 119,632 - 165,059 Total expenditures 62,500 182,790 - 31,258 22,145 (650,664) Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures - (62,500) (63,158) - 133,801 (22,145) 650,664 Transfers in (out) (13,317) - 141,053 (5,013) (3,027) (488,164) Excess (deficiency) of revenues and transfers in over (under) expenditures (13,317) - (62,500) 77,895 (5,013) 133,801 (25,172) 162,500 Prior period adjustment - - - - (13,237) - Fund balances at beginning of year 13,317 49 168 - (77,883) 5,013 (121,939) (13,741) Fund balances at end of year $ - $ 49 $ 168 $ (62,500) $ 12 $ - $ 11,862 $ (52,150) $ 162,500 Deferred revenues at end of year $ - $ 62,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Due to RCTC $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ Source: 2016 Financial Statements * No current year activity. Fund balance represents amount as of June 30, 2015. Section 99234 6/20/2017 55 ATTACHMENT 2 Transportation Development Act Article 4 Schedule Year Ended June 30, 2016 Banning Beaumont2 Corona Riverside PWTA RTA' SunLine' Total operating revenues $ 138,802 $ 410,788 $ 376,960 $ 127,087 $ 10,969,984 $ 7,481,057 Operating expenses: Depreciation and amortization 220,909 490,369 526,176 278,647 11,643,434 7,138,846 Other operating expenses 1,663,164 2,242,025 3,574,868 1,017,375 63,655,390 31,942,873 Total operating expenses 1,884,073 - 2,732,394 4,101,044 1,296,022 75,298,824 39,081,719 Operating loss (1,745,271) - (2,321,606) (3,724,084) (1,168,935) (64,328,840) (31,600,662) Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Grants: Local Transportation Funds 1,469,747 1,795,819 2,741,161 822,503 33,702,591 15,689,948 State Transit Assistance 304,569 2,050,085 83,077 4,615,361 873,861 Federal - 264,095 - 30,039,615 4,676,439 Measure A specialized transit - - 2,823,761 6,492,099 Proposition 1B - 596,863 213,463 448,437 351,977 Other 16,629 8,241 2,043,507 1,411,268 Interest income 1,902 39,993 8,107 47 141,416 2,498 Interest expense - (14,018) - (1,306) - Transfers in (out) 83,759 - - - Gain (loss) on sale of property (1,959) - 5,205 (34,165) Other - (1,701) - 950,622 Total nonoperating revenue (expense) 1,859,977 3,900,567 3,594,507 1,127,331 74,769,209 29,463,925 Net increase (decrease) 114,706 1,578,961 (129,577) (41,604) 10,440,369 (2,136,737) Prior period adjustment3 (1,535,380) - - 424,460 Net assets at beginning of year 287,486 1,104,406 3,349,959 (338,263) 2,519,961 67,200,800 53,004,752 Net assets at end of year $ (1,133,188) $ 1,104,406 $ 4,928,920 $ (467,840) $ 2,478,357 $ 77,641,169 $ 51,292,475 Deferred revenue at end of year: Operating $ 2,944 $ 169,366 $ - $ 29,922 $ 9,998,985 $ 581,623 Capital 1,035,114 - 1,288,495 113,433 17,029,998 2,007,385 Total deferred revenue at end of year $ 1,038,058 $ - $ 169,366 $ 1,288,495 $ 143,355 $ 27,028,983 $ 2,589,008 10.00% 10.00% 20.00% 10.00% 10.00% 17.45% 18.21% Actual fare ratio 13.50% 20.29% 11.34% 12.09% 24.31% 22.56°% Fare ratio compliance status Met Met Met Met Met Met Source: 2016 Financial Statements The audits for RTA and SunLine were completed by other auditors hired by each entity. 2 The audit for Beaumont is being completed by other auditor hired by city. 3 Prior period adjustment for Banning is related to implementation of GASB Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions -An Amendment of GASB Statement No. 27; SunLine adjustment is related to correction for an internal error in reporting 2015 audit results. Section 99260 6/20/2017 56 ATTACHMENT 3 Measure A Specialized Transit Schedule Year Ended June 30, 2016 Boys & Riverside Girls Club County of Community Community Dept of Friends of Independent Regional United States Blindness Southwest Care Connect - Connect - Mental Forest Moreno Living Inland AIDS City of Medical Veterans Voices for Support County Care -A -Van Connexxus 211 TAP Health Folk Valley Partnership Project Norco Center Initiative Children Operating revenues: Measure $ 63,855 $ 179,127 $ 317,904 $ 241,365 $ 76,175 $ 185,597 $ 153,249 $50,000 $ 68,376 $ 403,572 $ 72,349 $ 60,000 $ 288,451 $ 43,305 $ 81,631 In -kind match 4,500 - 58,427 - 6,439 75,043 - 46,272 7,891 596,057 - - - 133,465 Cash match: federal JARC/NF - - 23,110 - - - - - 78,075 - - Cash match: other revenue 28,395 96,162 85,953 125,098 33,307 21,751 79,126 8,697 27,333 - 54,724 30,909 229,025 37,529 - Total operating revenues 96,750 275,289 485,394 366,463 115,921 282,391 232,375 104,969 103,600 999,629 127,073 90,909 595,551 80,834 215,096 Operating expenses -in kind 4,500 - 58,427 - 6,439 75,043 - 46,272 7,891 596,057 - - - - 133,465 Operating expenses -salaries & benefits 61,335 159,117 280,756 177,899 81,982 46,945 163,863 25,070 132,378 45,563 66,215 427,745 59,686 50,000 Operating expenses-nonpersonnel 30,915 100,148 142,490 163,225 20,687 139,485 68,512 33,627 95,709 255,567 38,115 19,894 103,391 10,961 31,631 Operating expenses -administrative overhead 26,810 6,813 20,918 14,387 10,000 4,800 - 10,187 - Capital expenditures 16,024 - - - 13,500 64,415 - Total operating expenses/capital expenditures 96,750 275,289 481,673 367,934 115,921 282,391 232,375 104,969 103,600 998,389 107,178 90,909 595,551 80,834 215,096 Change in net assets 3,721 (1,471) - 1,240 19,895 - - - Program administrative adjustments' (3,721) 1,471 (12,347) Net assets at beginning of year - - - Net assets at end of year $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,240 $ 7,548 $ - $ - $ - $ Match requirement -cash (as adjusted) $ 26,895 $ 93,598 $ 105,342 $ 125,098 $ 32,974 $ 20,970 $ 79,008 $ 8,697 $ 27,333 $ - $ 44,203 $ - $ 243,415 $ 22,309 $ - Match requirement -in kind (as adjusted) $ 6,000 $ - $ 58,427 $ - $ 6,439 $ 75,043 $ - $46,272 $ 7,891 $ 211,810 $ - $ 30,911 $ - $ - $ 133,465 Actual match -cash $ 28,395 $ 96,162 $ 109,063 $ 125,098 $ 33,307 $ 21,751 $ 79,126 $ 8,697 $ 27,333 $ $ 54,724 $ - $ 245,756 $ 37,529 $ Actual match -in kind $ 4,500 $ - $ 58,427 $ - $ 6,439 $ 75,043 $ - $46,272 $ 7,891 $ 596,057 $ - $ 30,909 $ - $ - $ 133,465 Met Adjusted Adjusted Adjusted Adjusted Adjusted Adjusted Met Met Met Met Met Met Met Met match match match match match match requirement requirement requirement requirement requirement requirement Match requirement compliance status met met met met met met Source: 2016 Financial Statements ' Program administrative adjustments represent adjustments made to close out project agreements. Adjustments include elimination of unfunded costs which are the responsibility of the agency, return of excess cash match amounts to the agency, or resolution of questioned costs. Measure A Specialized Transit 57 6/20/2017 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Schedule Year ended June 30, 2016 r t L ATTACHMENT 4 canyon Banning Calimesa Lake Western County Corona EasNale Hemel Jurupa Valley Lake Elsinore Menifee Moreno Valley Murrieta Norco Perris Riverside San Jacinto Temecula Wildomar Revenues: Intergovernmental allocations: Measure $ 527,726 $ 150,460 $ 168,134 $ 3,705,049 $1,141,510 $1,619,495 $ 1,808,169 $ 1,163,010 $ - $ 3,817,548 $2,101,173 $ 589,925 $1,396,278 $ 7,374,869 $ 768,702 $2,735,934 $ 563,619 Reimbursements - 15,096,605 - - - - - - - - - Other revenues - - - - 7,751 41,385 - 9,780 - 35,709 - - - 801,149 - - - Interest income 6,422 2,727 3,167 130,665 11,776 23,096 835 10,018 80,681 60,448 7,573 48,839 158,738 7,636 33,629 Other financing sources -transfers in 13,303 815,426 - - - - - - - 1,243,193 - - - - - - - Total revenues 547,451 968,613 171,301 18,932,319 1,161,037 1,683,976 1,809,004 1,182,808 5,177,131 2,161,621 597,498 1,445,117 8,334,756 776,338 2,769,563 563,619 Expenditures and other financing uses: Construction and maintenance - 1,408,886 - 22,4-44,834 - 341,037 2,521,650 - - 332,597 - 1,773,389 584,147 - - 502,118 803,055 Engineering and administration - - - - - 1,070,749 398 - - - - Engineering and Other - - - - - - 1,648 - - - - - - - - - - Administrative overhead/overhead allocations/indirect costs 12,160 255,346 - - - - 27,784 3,379 Capital outlay - - - - 648,548 - - - - 2,354,851 458,183 - - 5,964,910 - - - Professional services - - - 4,143 - Debt service - - 137,000- - - - - 499,865 - 1,006,303 728,602 - - 2,996,088 - - - Transfers out - - - - - 129,098 487,462 1,084,000 - - - - 177,420 921,903 45,250 Total expenditures and other financing uses 1,421,046 137,000 22,700,180- 648,548- 341,037 2,652,396 987,327 - 5,848,500 1,191,326 1,773,389 584,147- 8,960,998 205,204 1,424,021 851,684 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures and other financing uses 547,451 (452,433) 34,301 (3,767,861) 512,489 1,342,939 (843,392) 195,481 - (671,369) 970,295 (1,175,891) 860,970 (626,242) 571,134 1,345,542 (288,065) Prior period adjustment/rounding 1 (1) 1 - - (8,328) (97,321) - - - 1 - 1 - 1 1 (107,365) Fund balances at beginning of year 1,465,222 1,282,772 261,943 14,050,331 3,176,595 3,013,116 1,574,008 930,300 3,994,808 8,387,734 6,216,829 3,384,829 3,758,636 19,356,870 2,529,047 3,817,647 599,835 Fund balances at end of year $2,012,674 $ 830,338 $ 296,245 $ 10,282,470 $3,689,084 $4,347,727 $ 633,295 $ 1,125,781 $3,994,808 $ 7,716,365 $7,187,125 $2,208,938 $4,619,607 $ 18,730,628 $ 3,100,182 $5,163,190 $ 204,405 Fund balance by year received 2016 $ 547,451 $ 830,338 $ 171,301 $ 10,282,470 $ 1,161,037 $ 1,683,976 $ 633,295 $ 1,125,781 $ - $ 5,177,131 $2,161,621 $ 597,498 $ 1,445,117 $ 8,334,756 $ 776,338 $ 2,769,563 $ 204,405 2015 948,833 - 124,944 - 1,101,681 1,593,978 - - - 2,539,234 2,076,116 $ 587,449 2,361,259 6,921,377 765,829 2,393,627 - 2014 516,389 - - - 1,019,987 1,069,773 - 2,001,534 562,809 813,231 3,474,495 738,334 406,379 - - - 947,854 461,182 819,681 Total fund balances by year received $ 2,012,674 $ 830,338 $ 296,245 $ 10,282,470 $ 3,689,084 $ 4,347,727 $ 633,295 $ 1,125,781 $ - $ 7,716,365 $ 7,187,125 $ 2,208,938 $ 4,619,607 $ 18,730,628 $ 3,100,182 $ 5,163,190 $ 204,405 Cash and investments $1,910,121 $ 848,327 $ 283,246 $ 8,904,790 $3,412,919 $4,088,507 $ 446,885 $ 936,072 $ - $ 6,794,068 $6,979,265 $2,112,123 $4,420,928 $ 17,626,769 $ 676,942 $4,673,428 $ 140,167 MOE Base Year requirement $ 164,325 $ 2,401 $ 28,873 $ 2,208,200 $ 38,949 $ 18,924 $ - $ 960,771 $ 214,225 $ 1,459,153 $ 595,702 $ 22,536 $ 1,218,470 $ 12,449,203 $ 156,391 $1,431,799 $ Amount of Excess MOE at end of year $ 220,449 $ 12,840 $ 104,815 $ 13,052,117 $ 42,866 $ 19,352 $ - $ 8,084,421 $ - $ 3,742,769 $ 534,647 $ 57,843 $ 1,238,003 $ 31,693,213 $ 333,871 $6,861,131 $ MOE compliance status Met Mel Mel Met Met Met N/A Mel Pending Met Met with use Met Met Met Met with use of Met N/A Completion of carryover carryover of Work Source: 2016 Financial Statements Measure A Local Streets Roads 1 of 2 6/20/2017 58 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Schedule Year ended June 30, 2016 r T Palo Verde? Coachella Valley 1 Valley 1 treTaT Eese-E RoT I County of I City Coachella Springs Indian Wells Indio La Quinta Palm Desert Palm Springs Rancho Mirage Blythe 1 Riverside 1 Revenues: Intergovernmental allocations: Measure $ 1,362,121 $ 591,913 $ 457,775 $ 257,309 $ 1,747,636 $ 712,771 $ 2,576,443 $ 1,939,198 $ 844,854 $ 889,630 $ 7,963,299 Reimbursements - - - - - - 570,878 - - - - Other revenues 15,512 - 25,000 - 517,438 - 3,627,892 56,112 27,761 - - Interest income 9,167 17,542 38 166 4,173 8,118 110,078 65,357 28,655 8,493 20,097 Other financing sources -transfers in 54,386 - - - 48,681 - - - - - - Total revenues 1,441,186 609,455 482,813 257,475 2,317,928 720,889 6,885,291 2,060,667 901,270 898,123 7,983,396 Expenditures and other financing uses: Construction and maintenance 1,351,572 - 374,056 300,000 1,546,630 - 2,418,818 9,933,798 - - 10,114,142 Engineering and administration - - - - - - - Engineering and Other - - - - - - Administrativeoverhead/overhead allocations/indirect costs 32,034 288,475 - - 71,170 Capital outlay - - - 647,311 200,056 - Professional services 35,592 - - - - - - Debt service - - 200,000 673,382 1,102,200 - 236,211 Transfers out 108,970 90,298 - - 238,571 - - - - 1,436,139 Total expenditures and other financing uses 1,460,542 125,890 606,090 300,000 2,747,058 647,311 2,418,818 11,035,998 200,056 1,743,520 10,114,142 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures and other financing uses (19,356) 483,565 (123,277) (42,525) (429,130) 73,578 4,466,473 (8,975,331) 701,214 (845,397) (2,130,746) Prior period adjustment/rounding - - - - - (1) - - - - - Fund balances at beginning of year 982,725 1,135,842 128,471 78,241 1,484,194 717,975 14,779,998 17,010,209 1,997,221 3,308,947 3,975,301 Fund balances at end of year $ 963,369 $ 1,619,407 $ 5,194 $ 35,716 $ 1,055,064 $ 791,552 $ 19,246,471 $ 8,034,878 $ 2,698,435 $ 2,463,550 $ 1,844,555 Fund balance by year received: 2016 $ 963,369 $ 609,455 $ 5,194 $ 35,716 $ 1,055,064 $ 720,889 $ 6,885,291 $ 2,060,667 $ 901,270 $ 898,123 $ 1,844,555 2015 - 607,943 - - - 70,663 4,319,120 5,974,211 880,507 897,385 - 2014 - 402,009 3,416,025 851,303 668,042 i - 4,626,035 65,355 - Total fund balances byyear received $ 963,369 $ 1,619,407 $ 5,194 $ 35,716 $ 1,055,064 $ 791,552 $ 19,246,471 $ 8,034,878 $ 2,698,435 $ 2,463,550 $ 1,844,555 Cash and investments $ 821,402 $ 1,539,569 $ 104,331 $ - $ 858,268 $ 669,025 $ 19,131,717 $ 10,826,243 $ 2,639,638 $ 2,358,356 $ 1,841,512 MOE Base Year requirement $ 391,688 $ 92,205 $ 75,147 $ 963,640 $ 2,048,564 $ 937,007 $ 2,398,146 $ 1,498,732 $ 674,811 $ 520,192 $ - Amount of Excess MOE at end of year $ 2,254,404 $ 3,204,949 $ 1,158,592 $ 12,055,634 $ 6,257,891 $ 3,575,908 $ 7,848,506 $ 11,515,555 $ 3,584,668 $ 104,909 $ - MOE compliance status Met Met Met Met Met Met Met Mel Met Met with use N/A of carryover Source: 2016 Financial Statements Measure A Local Streets Roads 2 of 2 6/20/2017 59 AGENDA ITEM 7C RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: County of Riverside Request for Right of Way Funding for Temescal Canyon Road Widening Project WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve programming $5 million of Measure A Regional Arterial (MARA) funds for the county of Riverside's Temescal Canyon Road widening project; 2) Approve Agreement No. 17-72-109-00 between the Commission and the county of Riverside programming $5 million of MARA for the right of way phase for the Temescal Canyon Road widening project; and 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The county of Riverside (County) is requesting $5 million for right of way acquisition for the Temescal Canyon Road widening project. Temescal Canyon Road serves as the only north -south arterial that runs parallel to Interstate 15 and is used as an alternate route to avoid congestion on 1-15. To address the congestion and safety on Temescal Canyon Road, the County is widening the road from two to four lanes from Dawson Canyon Road to Dos Lagos Drive. The project will also include realigning the road for safety purposes. An environmental document is being prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and is expected to be complete Summer 2017. Upon CEQA approval, the County may begin its right of way acquisition allowing the project to move forward with construction in 2018. The Commission's 1-15 Express Lanes project between State Route 60 and Cajalco Road will begin construction in 2018 and is expected to be complete in 2020. The next expansion of 1-15 south of Cajalco Road is not expected to occur for the next several years. Part of the Commission's Agenda Item 7C 60 plans for improving the 1-15 corridor includes the widening of Temescal Canyon Road. Given the congestion occurring today, staff understands the need to address this concern as soon as possible to provide a safe and viable alternative for travelers, which will also assist in providing relief when the Commission's 1-15 Express Lanes project is under construction. Staff reviewed different funding options and, since the project is not federalized or is listed as a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Regional Arterial program project, the only other funding source it qualifies for is MARA. MARA funds have been included in past calls for projects and can also be programmed at the Commission's discretion. Staff recommends approving the County's request and allocating $5 million of MARA funds for the right of way phase. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2017/18 Amount: $5,000,000 Source of Funds: 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial Budget Adjustment: Yes GL/Project Accounting No.: 005207 81401 266 72 81401 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \iffi4-4^ ,142, Date: 06/19/2017 Attachment: Letter from the County of Riverside Dated May 12, 2017 Agenda Item 7C 61 RIVERSIDE OFFICE: 4080 LEMON STREET, 5" FLOOR RIVERSIOE, CA 92501 (951)955-1010 FAX (951 ) 955-1019 May 12, 2017 Csaidg of iDirrsibt SUPERVISOR KEVIN JEFFRIES FIRST DISTRICT Anne Mayer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3ra Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Re: Temescal Canyon Widening projects Dear Anne, DISTRICT OFFICE: 16275 GRAND AVENUE LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 (951 ) 471-4500 FAX (951) 471-4510 1\MAY 1 L; RIVERaiDE GGO�PT' NANSPORTAT10N COMMISSION The Communities of Temescal Valley and El Cerrito have been impacted greatly by the increasing congestion on the 1-15 freeway. Temescal Canyon Road traverses the Temescal Valley and serves as the only north -south arterial and alternate route to Interstate 15. Local residents have reported that increased congestion has resulted in travel time being as much as 30 minutes to travel just one or two miles along Temescal Canyon Road because of traffic exiting I-15, in an attempt to use backroads to get around I-15, to escape the congestion on the freeway. It is common for northbound I-15 to back up all the way to Lake Street in Lake Elsinore due to the severity of the increased congestion. This congestion is having a negative impact on the duality of life of our residents due to the additional time spent on these overburdened roads while they commute to work and take their children to school during morning and evening rush hour. Providing additional lanes along Temescal Valley Road is necessary to provide relief to residents and commuters during rush hour and to provide capacity for emergency service providers. To address increased congestion and improve safety through the Temescal Valley, the County has identified three segments of Temescal Canyon Road to be widened with some portions to be realigned for safety: 1. Dawson Canyon Road to the Wildrose Business Park south limit 2. Wildrose Business Park north limit to Dos Lagos Drive 3. El Cerrito Road to Tom Barnes Street The County is actively working on the design and environmental clearance for the widening of Temescal Canyon Road, from two -lanes to four -lanes, between Dawson Canyon Road and Dos Lagos Drive, segments 1 and 2. Completing these two segments would give the public a continuous four -lane arterial between the Temescal Valley Interchange and Cajalco Road. The environmental document is expected to be certified in the next four months at which 1) WEBSITE: WWW.SUPEi1VISORJEFFRIES.ORG time the County will be ready to start purchasing property for the project. Moving forward with right of way acquisition will position the county to be able to start the widening project in 2018. I am requesting an allocation of $5 million for the purpose of purchasing right of way to allow segments 1 and 2 of the Temescal Canyon widening projects to keep moving forward. Attached is a concept plan of improvements along Temescal Canyon Road that have been completed or are in progress. Since expansion of the I-15 from Cajalco Road to Lake Elsinore is not planned in the foreseeable future, safety and capacity improvements to Temescal Canyon Road is the only available short term strategy to ease congestion nightmares of local residents. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this request. Respectfully, KEVIN D. ]EFFRIES Supervisor, First District Attachment: Map, Temescal Canyon Improvement Program 63 aril sl Temescal Canyon lmprouement Program El Cerrito Rd to Cajole* Rd t0.9 mile) Widen to 4 Lanes Construction Begin: TBD TTHE, xr:rREAT Lawson Rd Left Turn Lane Construction: Completed Coldwater Canyon Drainage Structure Construction: In Progress Dos Lagos Dr to Leroy Rd (0.6 mile) r Widen to 4 Lanes ▪ Construction Begin: Mid 2016 Right of Way Cost: 51.5 million p: s y Construction Cost: $6.5 million -- Proposed 4 Lanes -- Existing 4 Lanes U -- Left turn lane — • Drainage structure Dawson Canyon Rd to north (0.7 mile) i Widen to 4 Lanes 1 Construction Begin: Mid 2018 Right of Way Cost: $3.5 million Construction Cost: MS Million I (7SCA NA Condilaoned to wail n ,y,• me IfIrVAISSANCE RANCH HORSEY- HF CANYON Hostettler Rd Left Turn Lane Construction: Completed CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 64 AGENDA ITEM 7D RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: 2018 State Transportation Improvement Program Development BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Intracounty Formula percentage distribution among the three geographic areas in Riverside County (Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley) based on taxable sales per the STIP Intracounty Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for purposes of preparing the Commission's 2018 STIP submittal as follows: • Western County 77.30 percent • Coachella Valley 22.11 percent • Palo Verde Valley 00.59 percent. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The STIP is a five-year program of projects that is updated every two years outlining the commitment of transportation funds for the multimodal transportation system including highways, rail, transit, local roads, and bike and pedestrian facilities, also known as Active Transportation. In June of every odd year, Caltrans is required to prepare a draft STIP Fund Estimate (FE) that estimates how much funding will be available for programming over the next five-year period, Fiscal Years 2018/19 — 2022/23. Since each STIP cycle adds on two years, most of the programming capacity is typically in the last two years. However, with passage of SB 1, there could be programming capacity available in each of the five years. In August, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) is scheduled to adopt the FE along with guidelines detailing how regional agencies are to prepare the STIP submittals. The 2018 STIP FE establishes funding levels for the STIP and also the State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP). STIP funds are allocated into two broad programs — the Regional Improvement Program (RIP) receives 75 percent of the total STIP funds, and the remaining 25 percent is directed to Caltrans for its Interregional Transportation Improvement Program. The 75 percent RIP funding is further subdivided by formula into county shares. County shares are available solely for projects nominated by regional agencies. Agenda Item 7D 65 At the June 28, 2017 CTC meeting, 2018 STIP Draft FE was released indicating the statewide programming capacity and county share targets. The statewide draft programming capacity is $2,259,000,000. The Riverside County share draft programming target is $104,585,000. The Final 2018 STIP FE will be approved at the CTC's August 16-17, 2017 meeting. STIP Intracountv Formula Per the Commission's STIP intracounty formula, STIP funds are allocated to Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley based on the most recent fiscal year taxable sales by geographic area used for Measure A allocations. In addition, STIP guidelines allow up to 5 percent of funding for planning, programming, and monitoring (PPM) activities. However, the Commission's policy is to set aside 2 percent for PPM activities. The geographic area percentages of taxable sales used for the 2014 through 2018 STIPs demonstrates an increase in growth in Western County compared to Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys: Geographic Area 2014 STIP 2016 STIP 2018 STIP Western County 75.17% 75.76% 77.30% Coachella Valley 24.12% 23.54% 22.11% Palo Verde Valley 0.71% 0.70% 00.59% Based on the STIP Intracounty Formula, the 2018 STIP percentages will be applied to the county share target amount for Riverside County. Once the 2018 STIP FE's county share target for Riverside County is available, the table below will reflect the 2 percent off the top for PPM activities, and the amounts for each geographic area. 2018 STIP (based on Draft FE) Total Riverside County Share $104,585,000 Less: 2 percent PPM 2,091,700 Total New Project Programming $102,493,300 Western County 77.30 percent $ 79,227,321 Coachella Valley 22.11 percent $ 22,661,269 Palo Verde Valley 00.59 percent $ 604,710 2018 STIP Proposed Project Programming Western Riverside County Western Riverside County projects are nominated by staff. Recommendations for new projects for STIP funds will be based on consistency with Measure A and high priority projects approved by the Commission. The 2016 STIP was a "negative" STIP cycle as regions were directed to reduce Agenda Item 7D 66 their respective STIP programming to align with lower STIP funding levels and reduced programming capacity. As a result, the Commission amended its STIP submittal as follows: • Reduced the amount of programming on the Interstate 15/French Valley Parkway interchange project from $41.5 million to $15.3 million, net of a $6.1 million reallocation from the deleted 1-215 Southbound Connector project; • Deleted the 1-215 Southbound Connector project programmed for $8.9 million; and • Removed the I-15/Railroad Canyon Road interchange project, proposed as a new project, for $2.9 million in right of way funding (CTC did not allow any new projects for the 2016 STIP). Staff will evaluate the status of these projects for programming in the 2018 STIP along with other high priority projects in Western Riverside County. Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley The Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) nominates its projects and notifies Commission staff for final concurrence and submittal to the CTC. Palo Verde Valley projects are nominated by the city of Blythe (Blythe); however, given the minor amount of funding and complexity in processing these funds, the Commission and Blythe have executed MOUs in past STIP cycles trading Palo Verde Valley STIP funds with Measure A Western Riverside County Highway funds. Staff will meet with Blythe to discuss applying the MOU for 2018 STIP funds. The state's priorities have shifted to meet the goals established in SB 375, which is to reduce greenhouse gases according to targets set by the California Air Resources Board. Therefore, multimodal projects should be considered in developing the 2018 STIP. Current 2016 STIP Programming The current 2016 STIP projects for Riverside County include the following preliminary engineering, right of way, and construction phases as follows: APPROVED 2016 STIP Agency Project Phase FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 Total STIP *Temecula I-15/French Valley IC C $15,346,000 $15,346,000 Caltrans/ RCTC SR-60 Truck Climbing/ Descending Lane ROW, C $550,000 $31,555,000 32,105,000 RCTC/CVAG PPM C 663,000 668,000 668,000 1,999,000 CVAG CV Link, Phase 1 C 2,000,000 2,000,000 Totals $1,213,000 $668,000 $32,223,000 $17,346,000 $51,450,000 *Reduced in 2016 STIP per negative cycle C=Construction IC=Interchange PPM=Planning, Programming, and Monitoring ROW=Right of Way Agenda Item 7D 67 2018 STIP Submittal The 2018 STIP submittal is due to the CTC on December 15, 2017, unless the schedule is revised. The submittal requires various forms and reports that will involve Caltrans, project sponsors and consultants, and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The CTC is scheduled to adopt the 2018 STIP in March 2018. To accommodate the above schedule, staff plans on presenting its recommendations for 2018 STIP programming at the September 13 Commission meeting, unless the Final FE adoption scheduled in August is delayed by CTC. The proposed STIP projects will need to be submitted to SCAG by the end of September in order for SCAG to conduct performance measures analyses in accordance with STIP guidelines. There is no fiscal impact to the Commission. Agenda Item 7D 68 AGENDA ITEM 7E RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee LoreIle Moe -Luna, Senior Management Analyst Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: California Transportation Commission Active Cycle 3 — Additional Funding Opportunities Update Transportation Program BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the update on Active Transportation Program (ATP) Funding Opportunities Cycle 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The California Transportation Commission (CTC) awarded projects for the 2017 ATP (Cycle 3) at the statewide/rural and Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) levels in December 2016 and March 2017, respectively. Approximately $264 million was available in funding and nearly $977 million was received in funding requests. A total of 26 projects were submitted from local agencies in Riverside County, requesting approximately $66 million; and a total of 7 projects, totaling about $18 million in ATP funds, were awarded. Applicants who applied for funds in the 2017 (Cycle 3) Call for Projects have two additional funding opportunities to receive an award. • Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funds (GGRF) for ATP — AB 1613 appropriated $10 million from the GGRF for the ATP. The CTC initially made the funds available to projects recommended for funding in the 2017 call (Cycle 3); however, the CTC did not receive a sufficient number of project applications to fully utilize the funds. Thus, the CTC issued a call for projects for GGRF to all Cycle 3 applicants. Projects selected for these funds must be construction ready for programming in Fiscal Year 2017/18 and demonstrate greenhouse gas reductions and benefits to disadvantaged communities. Applications for GGRF are due June 30, 2017, and CTC staff recommendations are expected to be announced July 21, for approval at the August 16-17 CTC meeting. • SB 1 for ATP—SB 1, which was signed by the Governor on April 28, will provide an increase of $100 million annually for ATP. The CTC has indicated the $200 million allocated for FY 2017/18 and 2018/19 will be awarded through a 2017 ATP Augmentation Call for Projects to be released June 30 pending CTC approval of the guidelines. Applications for this call for projects would be due August 1 and consideration for funding will be made Agenda Item 7E 69 available to projects awarded in the 2017 ATP (Cycle 3) and projects that applied for funding in the 2017 ATP (Cycle 3) but were not selected. Priority of funds will be based on the project's 2017 ATP score and the following priority order: o Projects that can deliver all phases in FYs 2017/18 and 2018/19; o Projects that can deliver one or more of the project phases in FYs 2017/18 and 2018/19; and o Some FYs 2019/20 and 2020/21 programming capacity may become available as previously programmed projects request advancement into FYs 2017/18 and 2018/19. Awards for SB1 are expected to be adopted in October 2017 for the statewide and rural components (60 percent of funds) and December 2017 for the MPO component (40 percent of funds). Staff will continue to work with the local agencies, the Southern California Association of Governments, and the CTC and will return to the Commission in the fall with an update on projects that received and/or are being recommended for additional funding. There is no fiscal impact related to this item. Agenda Item 7E 70 AGENDA ITEM 7F RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Martha Masters, Management Analyst Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2017/18 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Funding Recommendations BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the Fiscal Year 2017/18 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program funding recommendations in the amount of $3,599,364; 2) Direct staff to prepare memorandums of understanding (MOUs) with the project sponsors to outline the project schedule and local funding commitments; and 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Each year, two percent of the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) revenue is set aside for bicycle and pedestrian projects through the Commission's SB 821 Program. At its March 2014 meeting, the Commission approved the Technical Advisory Committee's subcommittee recommendation to extend the SB 821 Call for Projects from an annual basis to a biennial basis mainly to accumulate more funding per call for projects. It also set the call for projects release date for the first Monday of every other February, and the close date for the last Thursday of every other April, beginning February 2015. Consistent with Commission policy, earlier this year staff released the call for projects on February 6. The cities and the county were notified an estimated $3,467,784 would be available for programming in FY 2017/18 through the SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program. Staff held a SB 821 Technical Workshop on February 16, 2017. Proposals were due April 27. The Commission received 34 project proposals, totaling $6,420,979 in SB 821 funding requests. The FY 2017/18 SB 821 Evaluation Committee comprised of six members representing staff from Caltrans District 8, Coachella Valley Association of Governments, the city of Indian Wells, Agenda Item 7F 71 Riverside Transit Agency, San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, and the Western Riverside Council of Governments. During the month of May, the evaluation committee met and reviewed 34 project applications, based upon the Commission's adopted evaluation criteria. Evaluation Criteria Factor Maximum Points Destinations Served 15 Safety 10 Project Enhancement 5 Multimodal Access 5 Matching Funds 10 Population Equity 5 Total Points 50 Summary of Requests Projects Submitted Coachella Valley Western Riverside 34 total 10 24 Summary of Recommended Allocations Coachella Valley Western Riverside Recommended Projects 6 15 Total SB 821 Recommended Allocation $1,088,672 $2,510,692 Recommended Allocation % 30% 70% Twenty-one projects totaling $3,599,364 are recommended for funding as indicated in Attachment 1. The difference between the estimated funding available and the amount recommended for funding this year is due to the availability of an additional $131,580 achieved through cost savings on previously claimed projects. Moving forward, additional project cost savings and returned allocations will be available for the FY 2019/20 call for projects. Staff concurs with the evaluation committee's recommendation. Per the Commission's SB 821 adopted policies, jurisdictions receiving an allocation have 24 months to complete approved projects and submit claim forms for reimbursement upon project completion. MOUs will be required to outline the project schedules, funding plan, and local agency match commitment. Staff will monitor the progress of the projects to ensure timely implementation of delivery and expenditures as the intent of the SB 821 program is to deliver and expend FY 2017/18 and FY 2018/19 funds within the timeframe of this cycle. Agenda Item 7F 72 Future Opportunities There are two new funding opportunities for active transportation projects that could fund projects being recommended for SB 821 funds. Projects that applied for the California Transportation Commission's Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 3 have the opportunity to apply for ATP Cycle 3 Augmentation funds made available from the passage of SB 1 and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funding (GGRF) program made available from cap -and -trade funding. Projects approved through the CTC for GGRF funds will be announced in August 2017, and projects approved under the ATP Cycle 3 Augmentation will be announced in October 2017 for Statewide Competitive funds and December 2017 for the Metropolitan Planning Organization funds. Staff will report back the results of these two new funding opportunities that could allow additional projects to be funded from this SB 821 Call for Projects. Therefore, staff is recommending to approve the projects identified in Attachment 1 (Projects 1 - 21), and, should funding be freed up from projects that are approved for ATP or GGRF funding, staff will recommend funding to the next highest scored projects. Financial Information Yes FY 2017/18 $1,799,682 In Fiscal Year Budget: N/A Year: FY 2018/19 Amount: $1,799,682 Source of Funds: Local Transportation Fund SB 821 allocations Budget Adjustment: No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 601 62 86106 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \iffi4-4^ ,1iwz'o- Date: 06/19/2017 Attachments: 1) FY 2017/18 SB 821 Funding Recommendations 2) SB 821 Evaluation Criteria Agenda Item 7F 73 Rank Agency 1 Palm Desert 2 Desert Hot Springs 3 Eastvale 4 La Quinta 5 Riverside County 6 Moreno Valley 7 Riverside County 8 Wildomar 9 Wildomar 10 Rancho Mirage 11 Lake Elsinore 12 Lake Elsinore 13 Riverside County 14 Palm Springs 15 Hemet 16 Lake Elsinore 17 Lake Elsinore 18 Lake Elsinore 19 Riverside 20 Indio 21 Lake Elsinore RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM FY 2017/18 PROJECT RANKING/FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Total Project Description Project Cost Recommended Projects for Funding Class II Bike and Golf Cart Lane Improvements - Citywide $ Desert View Sidewalk Project 65th Bicycle Safety Enhancement* La Quinta High School ADA Improvements Mayberry Ave Sidewalk Improvements (Stanford St. - Meridian St.) Gentian Ave. and Eucalyptus Ave. Class II Bike Lanes Clark Street Sidewalk Project* Grand Avenue Bike Lane -Phase I Grand Avenue Bike Lane -Phase II ADA Pedestrian Access Ramp Upgrades on Highway 111 Bicycle Lanes to Downtown Machado Street Missing Link Bike Lanes Serfas Club Drive Sidewalk Improvements Racquet Club Road & Farrell Drive Missing Links Sidewalks* Sidewalk and ADA Ramps (Alessandro Street) Chaney Street Missing Link Sidewalk Sumner, Mohr and Davis St. Missing Link Sidewalk W. Lakeshore Drive Missing Link Sidewalk Carmine Street Sidewalk Improvements (College Ave. - Sierra Vista Ave.)* Avenue 42 Sidewalk Gap Closure Mission Trail Missing Link Bike Lanes 22 Lake Elsinore 23 La Quinta 24 Temecula 25 Moreno Valley 26 Riverside County 27 Moreno Valley 28 San Jacinto 29 Banning 30 Riverside County 31 Perris 32 Palm Springs 33 San Jacinto 34 Coachella Totals Palomar Multi -Use Trail Jefferson Street Sidewalk Gap Closure Citywide Buffered Bike -Lane Striping Heacock St Sidewalk and Bicycle Lane Improvements Mayberry Ave Sidewalk Improvements (Peartree-Casino) Juan Bautista De Anza Trail Segment (Cottonwood -Bay) Cottonwood Ave Pedestrian Improvements Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Mecca Curb Ramp Accessibility Mountain Ave Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements Cerritos Road Missing Links Sidewalks Lyon Avenue Sidewalk Installment Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements ATTACHMENT SB 821 Funds Recommended Cumulative Average Requested Allocation Funds Allocated Score 170,000 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 43.67 $ 493,000 $ 293,000 $ 293,000 $ 378,000 42.00 $ 247,400 $ 123,700 $ 123,700 $ 501,700 42.00 $ 219,000 $ 109,500 $ 109,500 $ 611,200 41.33 $ 488,000 $ 244,000 $ 244,000 $ 855,200 41.33 $ 70,000 $ 49,000 $ 49,000 $ 904,200 40.67 $ 1,111,000 $ 555,500 $ 555,500 $ 1,459,700 40.67 $ 1,800,000 $ 270,000 $ 270,000 $ 1,729,700 40.00 $ 1,426,000 $ 214,000 $ 214,000 $ 1,943,700 39.00 $ 469,850 $ 234,925 $ 234,925 $ 2,178,625 38.33 $ 100,200 $ 50,100 $ 50,100 $ 2,228,725 37.67 $ 151,800 $ 75,900 $ 75,900 $ 2,304,625 37.67 $ 615,000 $ 307,500 $ 307,500 $ 2,612,125 37.67 $ 555,000 $ 277,500 $ 277,500 $ 2,889,625 37.00 $ 150,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 2,964,625 36.33 $ 275,660 $ 137,830 $ 137,830 $ 3,102,455 36.33 $ 195,905 $ 97,953 $ 97,953 $ 3,200,408 36.33 $ 263,868 $ 131,934 $ 131,934 $ 3,332,342 36.33 $ 337,000 $ 168,500 $ 168,500 $ 3,500,842 36.33 $ 177,495 $ 88,748 $ 88,748 $ 3,589,589 36.00 $ 19,550 $ 9,775 $ 9,775 $ 3,599,364 35.67 Unfunded Projects 491,046 $ 245,523 180,000 $ 90,000 189,000 $ 132,300 650,000 $ 582,000 495,000 $ 371,250 650,000 $ 585,000 200,000 $ 80,000 188,278 $ 75,311 363,800 $ 272,850 150,000 $ 75,000 190,800 $ 133,560 100,000 $ 50,000 257,641 $ 128,821 S 13,441,293 S 6,420,979 S 3,599,364 *Projects submitted yet not awarded through ATP Cycle 3. Potential awards through new opportunities: SB 1 ATP and GGRF 34.67 34.67 34.00 33.67 33.67 32.67 32.67 32.00 31.67 29.67 29.33 28.67 25.67 74 ATTACHMENT 2 RCTC SB 821 Evaluation Criteria FACTOR MAXIMUM POINTS DESTINATIONS SERVED — Three points will be awarded for each destination served by the proposed project (e.g. employment center, school/college, retail center, downtown area, park or recreation facility, library, museum, government office, medical facility) up to a maximum of 15 points. *Map with numbered destinations served must be included. -For pedestrian projects, destinations served must be within a 3/-mile or less radius of the proposed project. -For bicycle projects, destinations served must be within a two-mile or less radius of the proposed project. 15 SAFETY — The extent to which the proposed project will increase safety for the non - motorized public. Points will be given for any combination of the following project characteristics: no existing shoulder within project limits, no existing/planned sidewalk or bike route/lane/path adjacent to the project; and/or by providing: documented pedestrian/bicycle collision history, most current and valid 85th percentile speed of motorized traffic in project limits, photos of existing safety hazards project will address, existing pedestrian/bicycle traffic counts, student attendance figures for school served by project. 10 PROJECT ENHANCEMENT — Up to five points will be awarded based on the extent that the proposed project will encourage people to use the proposed facility; e.g. ADA ramps, bicycle lockers or other bicycle amenities, or completing a missing link. Enhancements must exist or be part of the project proposal. 5 MULTIMODAL ACCESS — One point will be awarded for each transit stop or park and ride facility served by the proposed project up to a maximum of five points. *Map with numbered transit stops or park and rides served must be included. -For pedestrian projects, transit stops served must be within a 3/-mile or less radius of the proposed project. -For bicycle projects, transit stops served must be within a two-mile or less radius of the proposed project. 5 MATCHING FUNDS — One point is awarded for each 5% of match provided by the local agency, for a maximum of 10 points at a 50% match. *Supporting documentation of proposed match must be included. 10 POPULATION EQUITY — Calculated by multiplying the local agency's cumulative total allocation by the local agency's population percentage (population percentage calculated by dividing the local agency's population by the total population of Riverside County). An applicant receives five points if the cumulative amount of funds received does not exceed the total of what the applicant would receive if the funds were allocated by population (calculated by RCTC). 5 50 Adopted 1/2015 75 AGENDA ITEM 7G RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: David Thomas, Toll Project Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: 2017 State Route 91 Implementation Plan STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the 2017 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 2002, AB 1010 authored by former Assemblyman Lou Correa allowed the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to purchase the 91 Express Lanes franchise from the California Private Transportation Company. The purchase agreement was completed in January 2003, at a cost of $207.5 million. AB 1010 also eliminated the existing non -compete clause in the franchise agreement that prohibited any capacity -enhancing improvements from being made to SR-91 until the year 2030. SB 1316 passed in August 2008, authorizing the Commission to impose tolls for 50 years on transportation facilities on its portion of SR-91 and authorizing toll revenues to be used for constructing and operating toll facilities on SR-91 in Riverside County. The purchase of the 91 Express Lanes and the elimination of the non -compete clause allowed much needed improvements to be planned and implemented within the SR-91 corridor. Caltrans Districts 8 and 12, the Commission, and OCTA have been coordinating these improvements. SB 1316 required creation of a new advisory committee with specific responsibilities appointed by board members from the Commission and OCTA. SB 1316 also required the continuation of annual updates of an implementation plan of SR-91 improvements for the Legislature. As spelled out in the legislation, the 2017 State Route 91 Implementation Plan was completed by OCTA, in consultation with Caltrans and the Commission, and details proposed projects and completion schedules for transportation improvements to Metrolink, express bus, freeways and interchanges, new east -west highway corridors, and high-speed rail. Updates From the 2016 State Route 91 Implementation Plan The 2017 Plan provides updated descriptions, cost estimates, and schedules for projects identified in the previous plan and also contains changes in project information as follows: Agenda Item 7G 76 " Project schedules have been revised within the horizon year timelines. The 2019 horizon year is updated to 2021. " The Metrolink Short -Term Expansion Plan has been restructured with station portions of the plan included in the updated Project 3 - Metrolink Service and Station Improvements, and with currently completed service enhancements included as Project B-6 (see Appendix B) and schedule has advanced by 10 years. Attachment: 2017 State Route 91 Implementation Plan Agenda Item 7G 77 STATE ROUTE 91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 17 In Association with: .4:131:0 Prepared by: Michael Baker INTERNATIONAL Austin Transportation Consulting ATC:_47,4411 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS I SECTION 1: 2017 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE 1 SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 9 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2021 10 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2030 15 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2035 19 SECTION 3: APPENDIX A - POST-2035 AND CONCEPTUAL PROJECTS 22 SECTION 4: APPENDIX B - COMPLETED PROJECT EXHIBITS 28 SECTION 5: REFERENCES 35 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN i 79 SECTION 1: 20 1 % STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE INTRODUCTION Previous law authorized the Califomia Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to enter into franchise agreements with private companies to construct and operate four demonstration toll road projects in Califomia. This resulted in the development of the 91 Express Lanes facility in Crange County. The four -lane, 10-mile toll road runs along the median of State Route 91 (SR-91) in northeast Orange County between the Orange/Riverside County line and State Route 55 (SR 55). Since the 91 Express Lanes carried its first vehide on December 27, 1995, the facility has saved users tens of millions of hours of corrmuting time. Wile the 91 Express Lanes facility has improved travel time along the SR-91 corridor, provisions in the franchise agreement between Caltrans and the private franchisee, the Califomia Private Transportation Company (CPTC), prohibited Caltrans and county transportation agencies from adding transportation capacity or operational improvements to the SR-91 corridor through the year 2030 from Interstate 15 (1-15) in Riverside County to the Crange/Los Angeles Counties border. Consequently, the public agencies were barred from adding new lanes, improving interchanges, and adding other improvements to decrease congestion on the SR-91 freeway. Recognizing the need to elirrinate the non-oompete provision of the franchise agreement, Governor Gray Davis signed Assembly Bill 1010 (Lou Correa) (AB 1010) into law in September 2002, paving the way for much - needed congestion relief for thousands of drivers who use SR-91 to travel between Riverside and Crange Counties each day. The gill allowed the Crange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to purchase the 91 Express Lanes franchise and elirrinate the existing cause that prohibited any capacity -enhancing improvements from being made to SR-91 until the year 2030. The purchase agreement for the 91 Express Lanes was completed on January 3, 2003, placing the road in public hands at a cost of $207.5 million. With the elirrination of the non -compete provision through AB 1010 and the subsequent 91 Express Lanes purchase by OCTA, Orange County and Riverside County public officials and Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 have been coordinating improvement plans for SR-91. Senate Bill 1316 (Lou Correa) (SB 1316) was signed into law in September 2008 as an update to the provisions of AB 1010. SB 1316 authorizes OCTA to transfer its rights and interests in the Riverside County portion of SR-91 toll lanes by assigning them to the Rverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC), and authorizes RCTC to impose tolls for 50 years. SB 1316 also requires OCTA, in consultation with Caltrans and ROTC, to issue an annual SR-91 Implementation Plan (Plan) and a proposed completion schedule for SR-91 improvements from State Route 57 (SR 57) to I-15. The Plans prior to adoption of SB 1316 induded a westerly project limit of SR 55. The Plan establishes a program of projects eligible for funding by the use of potential exoess tdl revenue and other funds. This 2017 Plan is the result of the requirement to provide the State Legislature with an annual Implementation Plan for SR-91 improvements and builds on the 2016 report, Mich was a major update of the previous annual Implementation Pans. This year's update includes projects that were identified in the 2006 Riverside County - Crange County Major Investment Study (MIS) as well as other project development efforts and funding programs such as the RCTC 10-Year VVestem County Highway Delivery Plan that outlines a number of projects such as the extension of High Occupancy Tdl (HOT) Lanes from the Crange/Raverside County line to 1-15 (currently under construction), the Califomia Transportation Commission (OTC) Corridor Mobility Irrprovement Account (CMIA) that provides a funding source for transportation projects, the extension of the Measure A program that provides funding for transportation projects in Riverside County, and the Renewed Measure M program that provides funding for transportation projects in Crange County. The 2017 Plan includes an overview, identification of issues and needs, time frames for project packages to improve mobi I ity on SR-91, and are listed based on a logical sequence for implementation. Project descriptions include conceptual 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 80 lane diagrams (as appropriate), cost estirlutes (in 2017 dollars, or as noted), and discussion of key considerations that need to be addressed in the planning and development of each project. This Plan will provide OCTA, ROTC, and Caltrans with a framework to implement SR-91 and other related improvements. Future annual Plan updates will continue to refine the scope, cost, and schedule of each project included in this version of the Plan. PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS Much progress has been made since the initial 2003 SR-91 Implementation Plan vvas approved. The 2017 Plan includes select oompleted project exhibits as a historical reference, see Section 4 Appendix B. Completed Construction/Improvement Projects As of June 2017, the following improvements have been constructed or implemented: ❖ Repave and seal pavement surfaces, restripe, and replace raised channel izers on the 91 Express Lanes. ❖ EB SR-91 restripe and r r Median barrier reconstruction project that removed the CHP enforcement area and extended the EB auxiliary lane from SR 71 to the Serfas Cub Drive off -ramp. ❖ VWB auxiliary lane extension between the County line and SR 241. This project eliminated the lane drop at the 91 Express Lanes and extended the existing auxiliary lane from the County line to SR 241 in the westbound direction. This improvement minimized the traffic delays at the lane drop area, resulting in improved vehide progression. ❖ VWB restripe project extended the auxiliary lane between SR 71 and the County line resulting in a new continuous auxiliary lane between SR 71 & SR 241. ❖ Express Bus improvements are implemented for the Galleria at Tyler to South Gast Metro route and Village at Orange to Rverside/Corona. ❖ Safety Improvements at the Truck Scales. Existing shoulders were improved, lanes were re -striped, illurrination improved, and signage was modified into and out of the EB facilities. ❖ Green River Road overcrassing replacement (See Section 4). ❖ Metrolink parking structure at the North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station (See Section 4). ❖ EB SR-91 lane addition from SR 241 to SR 71 (See Section 4). ❖ Additional SR-91 WB and EB travel lane between SR 55 and SR 241 (See Section 4). ❖ SR-91 \ArB bypass lane to Tustin Avenue at SR 55 (See Section 4). ❖ Metrolink Service Improvements (See Section 4). These projects provide enhanced freeway capacity and/or improved mobility for one of the most congested segments of SR-91. The completed EB SR-91 lane addition project from SR 241 to SR 71 (See Section 4) has greatly enhanced highway operations. This accounts for some of the improvement in existing EB p.m peak hour travel time from approx inutely 70+ minutes in 2010 to approxinErlely 50 minutes in 2014 (for the baseline travel time). In addition, there are two projects that have a direct impact upon SR-91 widening projects. The first is the $2 billion U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Santa Ana River Mainstem (SARM) improvement project that provides flood protection from the recently improved Prado Dam (near SR 71) to the Pacific Ocean. As part of the Corps' project, existing riverbanks have been improved due to the incroo,cd capacity of the Prado Dam outlet works, which can now release up to 30,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) compared to the previous facility capadty of 10,000 cfs. The only remaining segments of the Santa Ana River to be improved are Reach 9 Phase 2A, which includes areas along SR-91 from just oavt of the Coal Canyon Wldlife Corridor Crossing to SR 71, and segments along Weir Canyon Road near Savi Ranch. SR-91 project design teams have coordinated with the Corps, Caltrans, and other federal, regional, and local agencies in order to aaomrnodate future SR-91 improvements by the Corps bank protection project within Reach 9 Phase 2B by relocating the Santa Ana River. This has greatly enhanced the ability of Caltrans and other regional transportation agencies to implement many of the SR-91 improvement projects listed herein. The Corps SARM Reach 9 Phase 2B improvements were under construction as of September 2009 with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) "stimulus" funding and construction was finalized in April 2015. Environmental rtigation within the Santa Ana River perennial stream habitat restoration area will continue for another six years of the nine year mitigation program 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2 81 The other project with a direct impact to SR 91 is the $120 million Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SARI) sewer trunk line relocation. The existing SARI line is within the Santa Ana River floodplain and was in jeopardy of failure due to scour from the potential increased flood releases by the aforementioned Corps project. In order to relocate the proposed 48-inch diameter SARI line outside of the floodplain, which is inn ediately adjacent to SR 91, Caltrans highway RNV was relinquished to the Crange County Rood Contrd District (OCFCD) for location of the SARI line. SR 91 project teams have coordinated with the OCFCD, Caltrans, and other federal, regional, and local agencies in order to acoomnodate planned SR 91 improvements within the remaining State RNVsubsequent to relinquishment. This project completed the construction phase in mid-2014. The V\B SR 91 VMdening Project completed construction in 2016 from State College Blvd to Interstate 5 (1-5). This project added one V\B general purpose lane and removed the dedicated exit lane to State College Blvd from the SB SR 57 to WB SR 91 Connector that was causing operational issues due to the short weaving distance. \Able this project falls just to the west of the limits for the Plan study area, it will have an influence on operations within the Plan area and on Project 6. Completed Designs and other Reports In addition to the physical improverrlents in the corridor, there are various project development phase documents (Feasibility Reports, Studies, PSR, PANED, or PS8E) that are completed, or are in draft form and antidpated to be approved that identify improvements that will provide improved mobility. Those documents indude (also -.cc Section 5): ❖ MIS- Final Project Report: Locally Preferred Strategy Report (January 2006). ❖ Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan (November 2006). ❖ Project Study Report for SR 71/SR 91 Interchange (December 2006). ❖ RCTC 10-Year VVestem County Highway Delivery Plan (December 2006). ❖ SR 91/Fair nont Boulevard Feasibility Study (December 2009). ❖ Corridor System Management Plan (CS1VP) Orange County SR 91 Corridor Final Report (August 2010). ❖ Renewed Measure M Early Action Plan, approved August 2007 and subsequently renamed as the Capital Action Plan (April 2011). ❖ PSR PDS for SR 241/SR 91 Connector (January 2012). • PS&E for Initial SR 91 Corridor Improvement Project (GP) Project (2014). • PSR PDS on SR 91 between SR 57 and SR 55 (October 2014). • Measure M Next 10 Delivery Plan (Next 10 Plan), (November 2016). Updates from the 2016 SR 91 Implementation Plan In addition to the improvements and progress noted above, the following items that were induded in the 2016 SR91 Implementation Plan have been rrudified for the 2017 Plan update: • Various project descriptions, costs, and schedules have been updated from the 2016 Plan based on continued project development. • Project schedules have been revised within the horizon year timelines. The 2019 horizon year is updated to 2021. • The Metrolink Short -Term Expansion Plan has been restructured with station portions of the plan included in the updated Project 3 - Metrolink Service and Station Improvements, and with currently completed service enhancements included as Project B-6 (�co Appendix B) and schedule has advanced by 10 years. SR-91 CORRIDOR CONDITIONS Project Limits The project study limits encompass the segrr ent of SR 91 from west of the junction of SR 57 and SR 91 in the City of Anaheim in Crange County, to east of the junction of SR 91 and 1-15 in the City of Corona in Rverside County. The freeway segment is approximately 20.3 miles long, and indudes approximately 12.7 miles within Crange County and approximately 7.6 miles within Riverside County. Traffic Conditions Summary A review of traffic oonditions in the Corridor indicates that the existing carrying capacity of the facility is inadequate to accommodate current and future peak demand volumes, and that Level of Service (LOS) F prevails in the peak direction during the entire peak period, where LOS F is defined as the worst freeway operating condition and is 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 3 82 defined as a density of more than 45 passenger cars/lane/mile. The results also indicate that there are several physical constraints that generate unacceptable traffic queues. The followAng list summarizes the defidencies identified along the SR-91 Corridor: ❖ Heavy traffic volumes from 1-15 (North and South) converge with SR-91. The weaving and merging condition is complicated by the dose proximity of the Westbound (VV3) Main Street off -ramp. ❖ High traffic volumes from Gypsum Canyon Road and Santa Ana Canyon Road contribute to congestion on the mainline. A significant number of this traffic is redirected (balanced) traffic trying to bypass mainline congestion. ❖ Cne of the two EB lanes from The Eastem Transportation Corridor (State Route 241) is dropped at the merge to State Route 91 (SR-91), causing additional congestion in the EB direction. ❖ Heavy traffic reentering the freeway merges at slow speeds from existing WB and EB truck scales, impacting the general-purpose lanes. EB truck traffic must make two lane changes to stay on EB SR-91. ❖ SR 55 merges with SR-91. An EB lane on SR-91 is dropped (as a dedicated exit) at Lakeview Avenue and a second EB lane is dropped (as a dedicated exit) at Imperial Highway creating a weave condition. ❖ V\B SR-91 drops a GP lane and a 91 Express Lane to SB SR 55, which contributes to mainline congestion. This drop also oca rrs on the left-hand side of SR-91 as opposed to the typical right-hand connector exit. ❖ High demand from V\ir Canyon Road, Imperial Highway and Lakeview Avenue incroa delay during the peak hours. ❖ V\B traffic entering SR-91 at Lakeview Avenue to southbound (SB) SR 55 contributes to mainline congestion by weaving through three lanes on WB SR-91. ❖ The existing two lane connector from WB SR-91 to SB SR 55 is over capacity. ❖ There is a trap lane from EB SR-91 that terminates at SB SR-241 which creates a chokepdnt in the area. PROJECT SUMMARY Many of the highway projects and concepts identified in this 2017 Plan are based on the MIS that was completed in January 2006. The projects and concepts are presented based on potential implementation schedules and priorities established in the MIS as well as through subsequent project development. Table 1 sun flurizes the various pending, potential concepts, and completed projects in the 2017 Plan, and they are outlined below by implementation/construction schedule (.,cc Section 2 for detailed pending projects, Section 3 Appendix A for concept project sur r r r varies, and Section 4 Appendix B for completed project sum ales): • The first set of projects is antidpated to be completed by 2021 and includes four improvements at a total cost of approximately $1.65 billion. The projects indude the Initial SR-91 GP that will widen SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction east of Green Fiver Rd, add collector -distributor (CD) roads and direct south connectors at I-15/SR 91, extend the 91 Express Lanes to 1-15, and provide system'local interchange improvements, Express Bus service improvements, Metrolink service and station improvements; and a State Route 241 (SR 241)/ 91 Express Connector. These projects are in the process of final design, construction, or procurement and implementation, as noted in the project sur r r r varies. ❖ Three projects for implementation by 2030 include the interchange improvements at SR 71/SR 91, SR-91 widening improvements between SR 57 and SR 55, and the I-15/SR 91 Direct North Connector. OCTA, ROTC, and Ca!trans have initiated prelirrinary planning activities for these projects to ensure readiness when local, state, or federal funding becomes available. The 2030 projects are funded and underway in various stages of project development. Projects for implementation by 2030 would cost approximately $650 million to $754 million. ❖ Projects for implementation by 2035 focus on longer - lead time projects and indude a potential new interchange or overcrossing at Fairmont Boulevard, and the Ultimate SR-91 GP that includes widening SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction from SR-241 to SR 71 and SR-91 improvements east of 1-15. ❖ Long-range concepts for potential Post-2035 implementation (potentially earlier if funding becomes available) in Appendix A include an elevated 4-lane 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 4 83 facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR 241 to 1-15, the Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail, the Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-lane fadlity from SR 241/SR 133 to I-15/Cajalco Road (formerly known as MIS Corridor B), the WB SR 91 to SB SR 55 Improvements, and the EB SR 91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR 241. This multi -billion dollar potential concept program requires a significant amount of planning, design, and future policy and public input. In some ca:,cs, these concepts may indude previous projects as components, such that all concepts within this surrrrrary may not be implemented. Traffic Analysis For the 2017 Plan, the traffic analysis for major SR 91 capacity projects has been updated from the 2016 Plan. This analysis used the latest freeway operations software model available from UC Berkeley and traffic data calibrated to reflect new traffic patterns since the 2016 Plan. This freeway operations model provides a better depiction of actual travel delays experienced by motorists oompared to traditional travel demand models. The model can be used to analyze freeway bottlenecks sometimes neglected in traditional travel demand models. This approach is especially important given high SR 91 traffic vdumes and the potential for relatively few vehicles to significantly slow down traffic. For example, a nines- freeway merging area can cause many vehides to slow, cascading delay through the traffic stream, and suddenly both speed and volume rapidly decrease for major segments of the freeway. The operations analysis quantified travel time savings for WB morning and EB afternoon conditions for the following major capacity enhancing projects: ❖ New SR 91 V\B/EB lanes from SR 71 to 1-15 by 2017 (Initial GP, Project 1). ❖ SR 241/91 Express Connector with lanes to Coal Canyon on SR 91 by 2021 (Project 4). ❖ SR 91 EB lane between SR 57 and SR 55 by 2030 (Project 6). ❖ New SR 91 V\A3/EB lanes, various segments from SR 241 to oaut of 1-15 by 2035 (Ultimate GP, Table 1- SR 91 Implementation Plan Projects Project Summary (Implementation Year) Projects By Year 2021 1 Initial Phase CIP: widen SR 91 by One GP Lane in 1,407 Each Direction East of Green River Rd, CD Roads and I-15/SR 91 Direct South Connector, Extension of Express Lanes to I-15 and System!Local Interchange I rrprovements (2017) 2 Express R is Service I mprovements Between Orange 6 County and Riverside County (2017) 3 IVbtrdink Service and Station Irrprovemants (2020) 55.8 4 SR 241/91 Express Connector (2021) 181 SUBTOTAL 1,650 Projects By Year 2030 5 SR 71/SR 91 Interchange Improvements (2023) 6 SR 91 between SR 57 and SR 55 (2030) 7 I-15/SR 91 Direct North Connector (2030) SUBTOTAL 123.4 347-450 180 650-754 Projects By Year 2035 8 Fairmont Boulevard Improvements (By 2035) 76.8 9 Ultimate CIP: widen SR 91 by One GP Lane in Each TBD Direction from SR 241 to SR 71 and SR 91 Improvements East of I-15 (2035) SUBTOTAL 77+ 11 A-3 Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-Lane Fadlity from 8,855 SR 241/SR 133 to I-15/Cajaloo Road (Post-2035) A-4 wB SR 91 to SB SR 55 I mprovemants (Post-2035) 75 -150 A-5 EB SR 91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR 241 31 14,451- SUBTOTAL 14,956 Appor Completed Project Summary Sine 2006 Cost B (Constructed Year) ($M) I Concept Summary (Implementation Year) Art Concepts By Post-2035 and Conceptual Projects Elevated 4-Lane Fadlity (MS Corridor A) from SR 241 to I-15 (Post-2035) A-2 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High 2,770- Speed Rail (Post-2035) 2,720 3,200 B-1 Green River Road O✓erarossing Replacement (March 24,3 2009) B-2 North Main Street Corona MYtrdink Station Parking 25 Structure (June 2009) B-3 Eastbound Lane Addition from SR 241 to SR 71 51.2 I (September 2010) B4 widen SR 91 between SR 55 and SR 241 by Adding a 85.2 5th GP Lane in Each Diredion (January 2013) B-5 SR 91 w8 Lane at Tustin Avenue (April 2016) 45.2 B-6 M=trdink Service Improverrants (June 2016) 249 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 84 5 Project 9). The WB moming (a.m.) traffic analysis results indicate that for the year 2021 forecasts, travel tirru, in Riverside County are anticipated to improve significantly (by about 8 minutes) due to the indusion of the Initial Phase of the GP (Project 1), but increase slightly (by about 1 minute) in Crange County. Bottlenecks are anticipated at the Orange -Riverside County line and at the SR 241 interchange/Gypsum Canyon interchange area. A minor bottleneck is shown at the SR 55 interchange. The main bottlenecks in Riverside County have decreased because of the completion of proposed projects (including the Initial Phase of the GP), though some congestion is still forecasted. In the year 2030 forecast, WB bottlenecks occur at the Crange-Riverside County line and at the SR 241 interchange/Gypsum Canyon interchange area. This results in an increase in travel time within Riverside County from about 27 minutes in 2021 to about 45 minutes in 2030. The completion of Project 6 improves the minor bottleneck at the SR 55 interchange. Assuming Corridor A and the ICE are not constructed by 2035, bottlenecks appear at the Orange -Riverside County line, at the SR 241 interchange/Gypsum Canyon interchange area, and a minor bottleneck at the SR 55 interchange. With completion of the ultimate GP project, Riverside County 2035 travel times (about 19 minutes) improve dran alically with reduction to below 2021 levels (about 27 minutes). For all forecast horizon years, travel times in Crange County remain relatively unchanged between Existing (2016) and 2030 and show an increase in 2035 (approximately 5 minutes over existing) due to the growth in traffic and alleviation of bottlenecks upstream A project to address the operational aspects for the WB SR 91 to SB SR 55 movement is included (see Concept A-4) in addition to exploring multi-rrudal opportunities by OCTA on, or adjacent to, the SR 91 corridor that could provide additional congestion relief. The EB evening (p.m) peak hour traffic analysis indicates that for the year 2021 forecasts, bottlenecks are shown just before the SR 55 interchange, at the Orange - Riverside County line, and just before the Main Street interchange. Implementation of Project 1, the Initial Phase of the CIP, results in decreased Riverside County corridor travel times from approximately 26 minutes to 17 minutes in 2021. In the year 2030 forecast, EB bottlenecks are still shown west of the SR 55 interchange at the Orange - Riverside County line, and just before the Main Street interchange, with overall travel time increasing by approximately 11 minutes compared to 2021 conditions. For the 2035 horizon year, bottlenecks appear at SR 55, at SR 241, and just before the Main Street interchange. The 2035 travel times for EB SR 91 in Riverside County are reduced due to the completion of proposed projects but gradually increase (to an additional 14 minutes) in Crange County when compared to 2021. Figures 1-1 and 1-2 below show the existing (2016) and horizon year corridor travel times by County. 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 6 85 Figure 1-1- Mainline Westbound SR 91 from I-15 to SR 57 AM. Peak Hour Average Travel Time (IVinutes) 120 100 80 6❑ 40 20 Existing (2016) 2021 203❑ DOrange County DRiversideCOanz. 2035 Figure 1-2 - Mainline Eastbound SR 91 from SR 57 to I-15 P.M. Peak Hour Average Travel Time (Minutes) 120 100 80 60 40 ]0 Existing (2016) 2021 2030 U Orange County EIRiverside County 2035 ICE STATUS SUMMARY The ICE concept (see Concept A -3) was conceived as part of the MIS and was established as part of a suite of projects to support future peak demand volumes between Rverside and Crange Counties. The ICE was further evaluated in 2009 for financial and geotechnical feasibility. Seven (7) primary foceibility issues \here considered: ❖ Geologic, hydrogeologic/hydrologic, and geotechnical oonditions. ❖ Construction, Operation & Maintenance (C&M) costs. ❖ Corridor concepts (full tunnel and partial tunnel/partial surface road). ❖ Tunnel configuration. ❖ Tunnel excavation and support methods. ❖ Tunnel systems (e.g. ventilation, emergency fire system, operation building, toll system, etc.). ❖ Construction considerations. 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 86 7 At the condusion of the financial and geotechnical feasibility study in 2010, the Riverside -Orange Condor Authority Board (ROCA) directed staff to shelve the project due to its high construction cost and the difficult economic climate, and to reevaluate the concept on an annual basis during the preparation of the SR 91 Implementation Plan. The National Forest Service has continued monitoring of the ground water level along the prelirrinary alignment of the tunnel and has not found any significant changes since 2010. The technological ability to construct the large -diameter tunnels is currently available; however, the mst of tunnel boring machines (IBM) required to construct this project has not been reduced significantly. In general, no significant changes to the seven feasibility issues considered for the ICE concept have occurred over the last seven years. Conclusion An assessment of current economic conditions, lack of state and federal transportation funding; and the high construction cost is hampering the agility of OCTA and RCTC to implement this concept. Until considerable advancements are made in regards to effident and affordable tunneling technology, and more state and federal funding are made available, the concept will remain a challenge to implement. 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 8 87 SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN OVERVIEW The 2017 Plan describes projects, implementation schedules, key consideration, benefits, and costs (in 2017 dollars, or as noted) for major projects and concepts through Post-2035. Sorrle of the projects and concepts identified in this Implementation Plan are based on the MIS that was completed in January 2006. The projects and concepts are presented based on potential implementation schedules and priorities established in the MIS and subsequent updates. The schedules for implementation of the packages of projects indude 2021, 2030, and 2035. The 2021 projects are capable of being implemented through the project development process with minimal to moderate environmental constraints or are under construction. Some of the longer -range projects for 2030 and 2035 require more significant planning and environmental assessment prior to design. Each of the project or concept improvements includes an estimated project schedule. It is important to note that implementing various time saving measures, such as design -build or contractor incentives for early oompletion, may potentially reduce project schedules. The implementation pha,cs are defined as follows: -La Paima 1. 1_ine0ln eim Lind ALLA PPARK ❖ Conceptual Engineering = Pre -Project Study Report (Pre-PSR) - Conceptual planning and engineering for project scoping and feasibility prior to initiating the PSR phase. • Preliminary Engineering = Project Study Report (PSR) - Conceptual planning and engineering phase that allows for programming of funds. ❖ Environmental = Project Approval/Environmental Document (PA/ED) - The detailed concept design that provides environmental dearance for the project and programs for final design and right of way acquisition. The duration for this phase is typically 2-3 years. ❖ Design = Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS8E) - Provide detailed design to oontractors for construction bidding and implementation. ❖ Construction = The project has completed construction and will provide congestion relief to motorists. The intent of thcec Irplementation Plan project packages is to provide an action list for OCTA RCTC and Caltrans to pursue in the project development process or for initiating further studies. Figure 2-1- SR 91 Project Study Area from SR 57 to 1-15 YORBA LINDA ANAHEIM NORCO -CORONA i E. E FoalAy� Pyr 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 9 88 PROJECTS BY YEAR 202 1 The first set of projects will be completed by 2021 and indudes four (4) improvements at a total cost of approximately $1.65 billion (in 2017 dollars, or as noted). The projects include the Initial SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (GP) that will widen SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction east of Green River Rd, add collector -distributor (CD) roads and direct south oonnectors at I-15/SR 91, extend the 91 Express Lanes to I-15, and provide system/local interchange improvements; Express Bus service improvements; Metrolink Service and Station Improvements; and a SR 241/ 91 Express Connector. Further details for each of the projects are induded fdlowing the sum Tury below. Project No. 1 Project Summary (Implementation Year) Initial Phase GP: \Wen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction East of Green River Rd, CD Roads and I-15//SR 91 Direct South Connector, Extension of Express Lanes to 1-15 and Systerntu dl Interchange Improvements (2017) Cost ($M) 1,407 2 Express Bus Service Improvements (2017) 6 3 Metrolink Service and Station Ibtlovements (2020) 55.8 4 SR-241/91 Express Comector(2021) 181 SUBTOTAL 1,650 Figure 2-2- Sur rrr> lry of Projects for Implementation By 2021 FULL: 'TON 1 ei m PLCENTIA oa �4 Q� s o Li I® RANGij i� VILLA PARK YORBA LINDA ANAHEIM Bernardino ` CHINO \'\ HILLS 0016116., NORCO ILF CORONA e 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 10 89 Initial Phase D113: Widen SR-91 by One GP lane In Each Direction East of Green River Road, CD Roads and 1-15/5R-91 Direct South Connector, Extension of Express Lanes to 1-15 and System 1 Local Interchange Improvements outrU17MfA 91 l Project No: Anticipated Completion: 2017 Project Cost Estimate' Total Capital Cost Support Cost Total Project Cost $ 1,161,000,000 S 246,000,000 $ 1,407,0E10,000 Project Schedule— Preliminary Engineering Environmental DesignrConstruction Completed Completed 2013-2017 fr Cast obtained for Initial Phase is from ROTC (2014 dollars) " Schedule for Instal Phase; subsequent phase for Ultimate Project anticipated in 2035 (see Project 49) LEGEND Existing Highway Interchange/Ramp County Line ■ • ■ Coal Canyon Grassing p HOV Lane A Tolled Express Lane Existing Lane f• Proposed improvement Lane CO Road Al xiiary Lane t Braided Connector Project Description The approved Project Study Report (PSR) for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIF% from SR-241 to Pierce Street, includes the addition of a 5th general purpose lane in each direction, the addition of auxiliary lanes at various locations, additional lanes at the SR-711SR-91 interchange (Project 45), and collector -distributor (CD) lanes at the 1-15rSR-91 interchange_ Subsequently, the Riverside County Transportation Commission's (RCTC) 10-Year Delivery Plan recommended the fallowing in addition to the PSR recommended improvements_ the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County line to I-15, the construction of SR-91 (ER VB)11-'15 (SEIM) Express Lanes median direct connectors, and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction from the I-151SR-91 interchange southerly to 1-15fCajalco Road, and northerly to 1-15/Hidden Valley Parkway. An Express Lanes ingress/egress lane is also planners near the County Line_ Due to economic conditions, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow an Initial Phase with reduced improvements to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed later_ The fallowing is a summary of the deferred ultimate improvements: 1-15/SR-91 median Borth Direct Connector (Project 47), and 1-15 Express Lanes North to Hidden Valley Parkway (Project 49); general purpose lanes and Express Lanes from 1-15 to Pierce Street and general purpose lanes from SR-241 to SR-71. The 1-15 Express Lanes to be extended from Ontario Avenue to Cajaico Road are included in RCTC's 1-15 Express Lane Project with an anticipated completion in 2020_ Key Considerations Coordination among many of the SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the project limits is critical to successfully delivering these projects on schedule and within budget- Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects_ Minimizing conflicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project team. Additionally, future projects frequently have multiple alternatives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specifically, the project improvements need to continue to be coordinated with the SR-711SR-91 Interchange (Project 45), the SR-241191 Express Connector (Project #4), and RCTC's 1-15 Express Lane Project. Benefits The Initial Phase and Ultimate CIP projects will reduce congestion and delays by providing additional SR-91 capacity from SR-241 to Pierce Street, along 1-15 from SR-91 to Cajalco Road to the south, and to Hidden Halley Parkway to the north. Traffic operations will improve by eliminating or reducing weaving conflicts along SR-91 and 1-15 by the use of CD roads and auxiliary lanes. The project will provide motorists a choice to use Express Lanes for a fee in exchange for time savings. Current Status The environmental phase was completed in Fall 2012. A Design -Build contractor was selected in May 2013 and construction activities began in early 2014 for the Initial Phase. The project is anticpated to open to traffic in Spring 2017 with final project acceptance anticipated at the end of 2017. Coal Canyon County Line Crossing ingres&Egress lanes shown within the Express Lanes by restriping Green River Rd On r of Auto Center Dr Maple St On" O from to Aldo On Maple Si Center Dr On Off Off I On Off On T T 4n" Off 0� from Maple 51 5urfas Club Dr Serfas Club Dr On Lincoln Av Orf QH Main St On From On Ng From 04 -] SB I-t - 1 1 T 1 Dff Orr Off to Off On" On" Main to From From St i-15 Main SB 3-Lane Ca Road St "5 Connector from Main St EB on -ramp braid to join SR-g1 as a merge ramp Off to h1BrS 6 1-15 HOVIHOT lanes to 1-15/Ontario Av McKinley St On Oft 1 T On From �B 1-15 Pierce St On Additional lane by restripe of existing lanes 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 11 90 Express Bus Service Improvements Project No: 2 Anticipated Completion: 2017 Project Cost Estimate* Total Annual Capital Cost Total Annual Operating Cost Project Schedule Riverside/Corona to Anaheim Resort Temecula to Village at Orange Village at Orange to Riverside/Corona Riverside/Corona to South Coast Metro $ 1, 000,000't' $ 5,000,000' FY 2017 (Planned RTA Route 200) FY 2017 (Planned RTA Route 205) Existing (RTA Route 216) Existing (OCTA Route 794) ' Capital and Operating costs from OCTA and RCTC (2015 dollars) "20-year average Project Description Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), working with the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), plans an expansion of Express Bus service between Riverside and Orange counties. Commuters lack direct transit connections to some Orange County employment centers, and new Express Bus service can provide this connection. Existing Service OCTA has operated Route 794 since 2006 from Riverside County to Hutton Centre and South Coast Metro (shown in orange below). RTA has operated Route 216 since 2010 between the Village at Orange and Downtown Riverside (shown in red below). New Service Two new Express Bus routes are planned for implementation by Fiscal Year 2017 between Riverside County and Orange County including RTA route 200 (shown in blue below) from Riverside County to Corona and to the Anaheim Resort. The route would include three AM and three PM roundtrips by three buses. RTA route 205 (shown in green below) from Temecula to the Village at Orange is proposed to include two AM and two PM roundtrips by 2 buses. Existing RTA route 216 (shown in red below) from the Riverside Downtown Terminal to the Village at Orange is planned far expansion of service from the current two buses to four buses by Fiscal Year 2023. Upon completion of the proposed 91 Express Lanes, ROTC expects RTA to nearly double Express Bus service on SR-91. Currently, OCTA operates 15 bus trips per day on SR-91 and, based on expansion of ridership, RCTC envisions RTA adding 20 additional trips, eventually bringing the total to 35 daily trips. Service duration for this expansion will increase by 11,500 hours per year and will be served by five new RTA coaches to be procured specificaiiy for this service, and RTA will add five more coaches by 2017. Key Considerations Operating costs will average $5,000,000 each year and capital costs will average $1,000,000 per year. The cost sharing will be negotiated between Orange and Riverside counties. ROTC is committing $5,000,000 primarily far Express Bus purchases once the Riverside County portion of the 91 Express Lanes open. Intercounty Express Bus service is effective between locations where transit travel times by Express Bus would be more competitive than Metrolink and connecting rail feeder buses. There is some duplication of service between the existing Express Bus routes and Metrolink service. One reason customers are attracted to Express Bus service over Metrolink is that the cost is approximately 33% lower. There may be some merit to subsidizing Metrolink fares for price -sensitive transit riders in this corridor instead of keeping competitive bus service. Benefits Development of Express Bus services will contribute to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status A cooperative agreement covering the Riverside/Corona to South Coast Metro service with Riverside County has been developed. The Riverside County to South Coast Metro Express Bus route is currently operating. Expansion of the program is dependent upon available operating funds and future financial commitments with Riverside County. The implementation dates may change based on funding availability. Fill • TON PLACENTlA Anaheim Resort Y arL� Linda YORSA LJNDA Village at Orange %Min To South Coast Metro 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Corona Transit Center CO To Riverside 12 91 Metrolink Service and Station Improvements Project No: 3 Anticipated Completion: 2020 Project Cost Estimate* Anaheim Canyon Station Cost Placentia Station Cost Total OCTA Costs Project Schedule To be completed by 2020 $ 21,000,000 $ 34,800,000 $ 55,800,000 * Costs from OCTA and based on projected start of construction Project Description The Anaheim Canyon Station improvement project includes the addition of a second track, platform, extensions of the existing platform, and associated passenger amenities, including ticket vending machines, benches, canopies and signage. This project will improve the safety and on -time performance of Metrolink service, as well as improved pedestrian circulation within the station. OCTA is the lead on all phases of project development, including environmental. The proposed Placentia Metrolink Station will be a new station on the 91/Perris Valley line. OCTA is the lead for design and construction of the projects. Key Considerations Coordination has been ongoing with the Metrolink extension studies for the Anaheim Canyon and Placentia Station Improvements. Benefits Enables development of expanded Metrolink service, improved efficiency, and fosters train ridership growth in the region which will contribute to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status Preliminary plans and environmental clearance of the Anaheim Canyon Station projects were completed in early 2017. Final plans, specifications and estimates are expected to be completed in May 2019. Construction for the Anaheim Canyon Station improvements should begin in fall 2019. Plans for the new Placentia Station platforms, station amenities, and parking are 95 percent complete. The plans are being revised to include a parking structure and are anticipated to be complete and ready to bid in fall 2017. Construction is anticipated to begin in spring 2018. I I Ono L PLACENTIA w Anaheim Canyon 1 Station RAN4 VILLA I PARK YORBA LINDA{ /g ANAHEIM THE CROSSINGS [TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT) ABANDONED TRACK EXISTING SNGLE TRACK BRIDGE (TO EE REMOVED) &90 NEW SECOND PLATFORM PlATFOFNI ACCESS F PROPOSED MAIN IRAGN gff-2) PROP+]SET 1 DIY PLATFORM EI:TENSIDN "' SfINllII"�>r✓vY RIH}kl}IHNIHII9 I{INHIH+IHMN$M ICI{iHEAi}Ilil 10114 HITµel{t POSSIBLE PARKING DIPANSION AREA Image source: Anaheim Canyon Station Project Definition Report, February 23, 2015 IXISIING WM TRACK 1 (4F-1) wi LI Al" LI k 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 13 92 5R-241/91 Express Connector Project No: 4 Anticipated Completion: 2021 Project Cost Estimate* Total Project Cost $ 181,000,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design/Construction Completed 2012-2018 2018-2021 * Assumes a 2-lane connector, extending as far as Coal Canyon. 1 LEGEND Existing Highway Interchange/Ramp County Line Coal Canyon Crossing Foiled Express Lane Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane 1 Project#1 Improvements Cn4L-- Gypsum Canyon Rd Oft On Off Off Dff� On Project Description The SR-241191 Express Connector will carry northbound (NB) SR-241 traffic to eastbound (EB) 91 Express Lanes and carry westbound (WB) 91 Express Lanes traffic to southbound (SB) SR-241. Outside widening would be required on the south side of SR-91 for realignment of EB lanes up to the Coal Canyon Crossing. Key Considerations This project was originally planned as a High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) connector into the SR-91 HOV lane. With the implementation of the 91 Express Lanes, the project will need to carefully coordinate the traffic operations and tolling policies that will result with the convergence of the SR-241 Toll Road, the existing OCTA 91 Express Lanes, and the proposed extension of the 91 Express Lanes by RCTC. The project will follow the SR-91 CIF (Project #1) in its implementation and will need to be designed accordingly. Continuous operations of the 91 Express Lanes will be a key consideration for this project. The preliminary analysis calls for the SR-91 center median to be widened to the south to make room for a two lane (one in each direction) direct connector and associated Express Auxilliary Lanes in each direction. The project would tie into the SR-91 CIP improvements at Coal Canyon. Coordination will be conducted with local agencies to ensure project accommodates planned bicycle and trail connections per City General Plans and the OCTA Commuter Bikeways Strategic Plan. Benefits The project will provide connectivity from the 91 Express Lanes and the SR-241 Eastern Transportation Corridor System. The project improves access to SR-241 and South County for traffic that does not currently utilize the 91 Express Lanes, which also improves WB SR-91 by eliminating the need for HOV and Express Lane users to weave across four general purpose lanes to use the existing SB SR-241 connector. it will help alleviate congestion through the corridor by allowing SR-241 and 91 Express Lanes users to bypass the existing 241/91 general purpose connectors. Coal Canyon Crossing County Line Ingress/Egress lanes shown within Express Lanes by restriping (Project 41) Current Status Preliminary engineering concepts for a SR-241191 Express Lanes direct connector have been developed by The Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency (TCA) and Caltrans. The 91 Express Lanes Extension and SR-241 Connector Feasibility Study was completed in March 2009 and was initiated to evaluate the various alternatives. A Project Study Report was initiated in January 2011 and was completed by January 2012. The Draft Project Report and Draft Environmental Document were completed in late- 2016, and the Final Project Report and Environmental Document is anticipated to be completed in late-2017. Final Engineering is underway and anticipated to be completed in mid-2018. 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 14 93 PROJECTS BY YEAR 2030 Projects for implementation by 2030 indude the interchange improvements at SR 71/SR 91, SR 91 widening improvements between SR 57 and SR 55, and I-15/SR 91 North Direct Connector. The 2030 projects are at least partially funded and underway in various stages of project development. OCTA, RCTC, and Ca!trans have initiated preliminary planning activities for these projects to ensure readiness when local, state, or federal funding becomes available. Consequently, there may be opportunities to advance these projects if additional funding is made available. Projects for implementation by 2030 are expected to cost approximately $650 million to $754 million (in 2017 ddlars, or as noted). Project No. Project Summary (Implementation Year) Cost (5M) 5 SR 71/SR 91 Interchange Irrprovemants (2023) 123.4 6 SR 91 between SR-57 and SR 55 (2030) 347- 50 7 I-15✓SR 91 North Direct Connector (2030) 180 SUBTOTAL 650 — 754 Figure 2-3- Sur rrrIffy of Projects for Implementation By 2030 TON PLACENTIA PI ucentlo 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 15 94 SR-71/SR-91 Interchange Improvements Gp1AF Ogiy,^ Project No: 5 Anticipated Completion: 2023 Project Cost Estimate* Total Project Cost $ 123,397,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction Completed Completed Completed 2021-2023 Cost obtained from preliminary engineer's cost estimate (2011 dollars) LEGEND Existing Highway Interchange/Ramp County Line ■ • ■ Coal Canyon Crossing A Tolled Express Lane Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane ® CD Road OM Auxiliary Lane — Project #1 and #4 Improvements Project Description The current project includes a new two-lane direct connector flyover from eastbound (EB) SR-91 to northbound (NB) SR-71 and modifications to the existing Green River Road EB SR-91 on -ramp. Key Considerations Project improvements must be coordinated with the following projects: the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) (Project #1 and #9) and the SR-241/91 Express Connector (Project #4). The Green River Road Overcrossing Replacement was completed in March 2009 (see Appendix B Project # B-1) and consisted of replacing the previously existing Green River Road Overcrossing with a new six -lane wide, 4-span overcrossing to accommodate widening of SR-91 by Projects #1, #4, and #9. The SR-91 CIP (Project #1, #9) project design -build team began construction activities in early 2014. The Project Report and Environmental Document for the SR-241191 Express Connector (Project #4) is anticipated to be completed by late 2017. Close coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife will also be required as the connector crosses the Santa Ana River below the Prado Dam. In addition, implementation of Major Investment Study (MIS) Corridor A (Concept #A-1) within the median of SR-91 will require the need for a three -level crossing of SR-91 and the proposed SR-71 direct flyover connector. Coordination will be required with an at -grade or grade -separated managed lane ingress/egress facility that may be located near the county boundary as part of the SR-91 CIP (Project #1, #9). Benefits The project will provide a new direct connector improvement from EB SR-91 to NB SR-71, replacing the geometric choke point created by the existing connector. The project will also improve traffic operations and operational efficiency by eliminating or minimizing weaving conflicts through the use of auxiliary lanes. Current Status The environmental phase was completed in June 2011. Final design was completed in 2015. Construction is deferred to 2021-2023 pending funding availability. Ingress/Egress lanes shown within the Express Lanes by restriping by Project #1 Lane shown is for Project #1 {Typical} Off Lanes shown are for the SR-241191 Express Connector Project #4 �iaty GypsUn fr Canyon Rd T On OR I ,l Coal Canyon County Line Green River Rd Cro sing On h off - - 1 On uY On On Off On from Green River Rd Off T On Auto Center Dr On from On A Maple St 1 1 Off to Maple 5t Serfas Club Dr 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 16 95 SR-91 Improvements between SR-57 and SR-55 Project No: 6 Anticipated Completion: 2030 Project Cost Estimate* Total Project Cost, Low $ 347,000,000 Total Project Cost, High $ 450,000,000 Project Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction Completed Completed 2015-2019 2020-2022 2028-2030 LEGEND - Existing Highway - Interchange/Ramp 0 HOV Lane Tolled Express Lane li Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane Interchange improvements — at Kraemer Blvd/Glassell St SR-57 State College Blvd Kraemer Blvd Off On Off On On Off On Off Project Description Improve the SR-571SR-91 interchange complex, including local inter- changes, and adding capacity between SR-55 and SR-57. An improve- ment to NB SR-57 for an Orangethorpe Av Bypass was analyzed, but does not provide congestion relief to SR-91; therefore, is dropped from consider- ation. In addition, a drop on -ramp from Lakeview Av would be located between realigned WB SR-91 lanes for direct access to SB SR-55. Specific improvements will be subject to approved plans developed in cooperation with local jurisdictions and affected communities. Improvements also include splitting the WB SR-91 Connector to SR-57 into separate exits and extending WB SR-91 lane additions through State College Blvd to connect with the auxiliary lane to Raymond Av-East St. The improvements for the Build Alternative include one EB GP lane from east of SR-57 to the SR-55 connector. One WB GP lane is added from NB SR-57 Connector through the State College Blvd interchange. An additional option was considered for WB SR-91 that included SR-57 connector metering instead of the lane additions from the SR-57 connectors; however, it did not relieve traffic congestion and is not considered further. Key Considerations The proposed project improvements on WB and EB SR-91 may require right-of-way acquisition. A non-standard geometric cross-section will minimize the amount of acquisitions. Benefits The proposed project improvements on WB and EB SR-91 between SR-57 and SR-55 include, among other features, adding one EB general purpose lane to achieve lane balancing. The project improvements will reduce congestion and delay. Current Status The project improvement for EB SR-91 widening and for improvernents to SR-571SR-91, Lakeview and SR-551SR-91 were studied by the SR-91 Feasibility Study, which was completed in June 2009. Preliminary engineering was completed in 2014 and the Environmental phase began in early 2015. The proposed improvements are included in the Measure M2 program through the Environmental phase. Diverge for WB SR-91 and SB SR-55 Interchange improvements at Lakeview Av Th4 SB SR-55 Drop On -Ramp Lakeview Av WB SR-91 On On Off On Off On GlasseII St Interchange improvements at Tustin Av Tustin Av Off On NB SR-55 On Off T Off SB SR-55 Tustin Av off Off On Off 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 17 96 1-15l511-91 North Direct Connector Project No: 7 Anticipated Completion: By 2030 Project Cast Estimate" Total Project Cost S 18d,000,40{} Project Schedule"` Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design/Construction 2018-2019 2016-2I} 19 TBD ' Cost from RCTC (21}17 Dollars) LEGEND i Existing highway InterchangeiRamp tp HOY Lane Totted Express Lane Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane Project #1 and #5 improvements + Braided Connector r Gp�,tFOR.y�� 91 Project Description The Project Approval and Environmental Document (PAfED) for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP), from SR-241 to Pierce Street, included the addition of a 5th lane in each direction, the addition of auxiliary lanes at various locations, the addition of collector -distributor {CD} lanes at the I-15/SR-91 interchange, the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County line to I-15, the construction of a SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from 1-15 South, a SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from 1-15 North (North Direct Connector, the subject project), and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction from the I-15fSR-91 interchange southerly to I-151Cajalco Road (now part of RCTC 1-15 Express Lanes Project [ELPD, and easterly to east of McKinley Street. Due to economic conditions, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow an Initial Phase (Project 41), with reduced improvements, to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed later_ Subsequently, the proposed 1-151SR-91 median North Direct Connector improvements have been pulled out from the CIP as a standalone project to be implemented prior to the Ultimate CIP (Project #9). The 1-15 Express Lanes to be extended from Ontario Avenue to Cajalco Road are included in RCTC's I-15 Express Lane Project with art anticipated completion date in 2020. Key Considerations Coordination among many of the SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the project limits is critical to successfully delivering these projects on schedule and within budget. Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects_ Minimizing conflicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project team_ Additionally, future projects frequently have multiple alternatives under study, each with differing scope and constructlon footprints. Specifically, the project improvements need to continue to be coordinated with the Initial CIP (Project 41), the SR-71/SR-91 interchange (Project45), the SR-241l91 Express Connector (Project 44), and RCM's 1-15 Express Lanes Project_ Benefits The 1-15/SR-91 North Direct Connector project will reduce congestion and operational delays by providing direct median -to -median access between SR-91 and 1-15 Express Lanes- Traffic operation will improve by eliminating weaving conflicts along SR-91 and 1-15 by the use of the direct connectors_ The project will provide motonsts a choice to use the Express Lanes Connector for a fee in exchange for time savings_ Current Status Preliminary engineering is complete as a component of the CIP project, but will be revisited at a future date as a standalone project_ The Ultimate CIP Project, which includes the 1-15fSR-91 North Direct Connector, is currently discussed in the environmental document for the Initial Phase that was completed in 2012_ However, separate standalone environmental documentation will be prepared. Green River Rd Off Off Lanes shown are for the SR-71lSR-91 interchange east to north flyover connector for SR-71, and connector from Green River Road to EB SR-91 (Project #5) Auto Center Dr Off Or Serfas Club Dr Lane shown is for Green River Rd EB SR-91 On -Ramp (Project 45) Maple St Lincoln Av Or ▪ Oft On • Off On On' it On off On Off 3-Lane CD Road from Main St ES On -Ramp braid to join SR-91 as a merge ramp (Project 41 ) Main St Off On Off Express Lanes to 1-15/Hidden Valley Pkwy On' Off' to NBISB 1-15 McKinley St Pierce St 11 era On From From SB NB 1-15 1-15 Express Lanes to 1-15tCal'alco Rd (by RCTC 1-15 ELF') 1 r 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 18 97 PROJECTS BY YEAR 203 5 Projects for implementation by 2035 focus on longer -lead time projects and include a potential new interchange or overcrassing at Fairmont Boulevard; and the Ultimate SR 91 GP that indudes widening SR 91 by one GP lane in each direction from SR 241 to SR 71 and SR 91 improvements east of 1-15. Project No. Project Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($M) 8 Fairmcrt Boulevard Improvements (By 2035) 76.8 9 Utimate GP: \Men SR 91 by Cne GP Lane in Each Direction from SR 241 to SR 71, and SR 91 Improvements Fast of 1-15 (2035) TBD SUBTOTAL 77+ Figure 2-4- &Dult:try of Projects for Implementation by 2035 FULL �'TON z PLACENTIA V Placontin ,VILLA FPARK f„rr r Jd ANAHEIM Bernardino CHINO HILLS CORONA NORCO 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 19 98 Fairmont Boulevard Improvements Project No: S Anticipated Completion: By 2035 Project Cost Estimate" Capital Cost Support Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 67,800,000 $ 9,000,000 $ 76,800,000 Completed TBD TB❑ TB❑ TB❑ Costs from Feasibility Study (2009 dollars). R1W cost is undetermined at this time. Cost does not include potential impact to Santa Ana River. LEGEND - Existing Highway - InterchangefRamp p HOV Lane A. Tolled Express Lane Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane Off On Project Description The project would provide a new interchange with SR-91 at Fairmont Boulevard. On and off ramps will connect Fairmont Boulevard from the north to eastbound {EB} and westbound (WB) SR-91. The proposed interchange does not include a vehicular Fairmont Boulevard connection to Santa Ana Canyon Road to the south. A pedestrian/bicycle connection is also proposed between La Palma Avenue and Santa Ana Canyon Road. This bridge and pathway will allow for direct Santa Ana River Trail access from both Anaheim south of SR-91 and from Yorba Linda. Key Considerations Interchange spacing and weaving issues (to SR-55) need to be evaluated. Widening of SR-91 may be needed to accommodate interchange ramps. Proximity of the Santa Ana River may require that the WB ramp junction be located north of the river. New connection requirements and interchange spacing needs to be considered. Ramp and bridge placement needs to take pedestrian/bicycle bridge into account, or incorporate the pedestrian/bike path into the design beyond the vehicular access limits of the project. Benefits The interchange is expected to relieve congestion at Imperial Highway (SR-90), Lakeview Avenue, and Weir Canyon Road Interchanges. Preliminary traffic modeling shows a 10-15% decrease in volumes at Weir Canyon and SR-90 interchanges with the interchange alternative. Current Status The City of Anaheim completed a conceptual engineering study in December 2009 for the interchange. Multiple alternatives have been developed as part of the conceptual engineering study. Bicycle/pedestrian bridge is currently in initial planning stages. Project development is pending funding identification. OCTA is currently studying multiple conceptual alternatives for intermediate access to the 91 Express Lanes. Alternatives may include different ingress and egress options near Fairmont Boulevard. Results of this study will be presented to OCTA Committee and Board in July 2017. The Plan will be updated as necessary in the future with study results. Fairmont Blvd A ❑n Off Off 0 n 91 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 99 20 Ultimate CIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP Lane in Each direction from SR-241 to SR-71, and SR-91 Improvements East of 1-15 Project No: 9 Anticipated Completion: 2035 Project Cost Estimate* To Be Determined Project Schedule** Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design/Construction Schedule for Ultimate Project anticipated by 2035 TBD TBD TBD LEGEND 01 Existing Highway .�• Interchange/Ramp County Line Coal Canyon Crossing 0 HOV Lane Tolled Express Lane UM Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane Auxiliary Lane Project#1, #4, #5 and #7 Improvements * Braided Connector Off Lanes shown are for the 5R-241191 Express Connector (Project #4) Existing bike path will be preserved Project description The Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA/ED) for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP), from SR-241 to Pierce Street, included the addition of a 5th lane in each direction, the addition of auxiliary lanes at various locations, the addition of collector -distributor (CD) lanes at the 1-15/SR-91 interchange, the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County line to 1-15, the construction of a SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from 1-15 South, a SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from 1-15 North (North Direct Connector, Project #7), and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction from the 1-151SR-91 interchange southerly to 1-15/Cajalco Road (now part of RCTC 1-15 Express Lanes Project [ELPD, and easterly to east of McKinley Street. Due to economic conditions, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow an Initial Prase (Project #1), with reduced improvements, to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed later. The following is a summary of the proposed ultimate CIP improvements: SR-91 general purpose lanes from 1-15 to Pierce Street; SR-91 general purpose lanes from SR-241 to Green River Road; and construction of one Express Lane in each direction from 1-15 to east of McKinley Street. Ultimate project widens all SR-91 lanes to standard lane and shoulder widths from SR-241 to SR-71. These Ultimate improvements are the subject of this project. The I-15 Express Lanes to be extended from Ontario Avenue to Cajaico Road are included in RCTC's 1-15 Express Lanes Project with an anticipated completion date in 2020. The SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from 1-15 North (North Direct Connector) is now a separate project (Project #7), Key Considerations Coordination among many of the SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the project limits is critical to successfully delivering these projects on schedule and within budget. Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects. Minimizing conflicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project team. Additionally, future projects frequently have multiple alternatives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specifically, the project improvements need to continue to be coordinated with the Initial CIP (Project #1), the SR-71/SR-91 interchange (Project #5), the SR-241f91 Express Connector (Project #4), SR-91f1-15 North Direct Connector (Project #7), and RCTC's 1-15 Express Lanes Project. Benefits The Initial Phase and Ultimate CIP projects will reduce congestion and delays by providing additional SR-91 capacity from SR-241 to Pierce Street and along 1-15 from SR-91 to Gajalco Road to the south and to Hidden Valley Parkway to the north. Traffic operation will improve by eliminating or reducing weaving conflicts along SR-91 and 1-15 by the use of CD roads and auxiliary lanes. The project will provide motorists a choice to use Express Lanes for a fee in exchange for time savings. Current Status Preliminary engineering is complete but may need to be revisited at a future date. The Ultimate Project is currently discussed in the environmental document for the Initial Phase that was completed in 2012. Express Lanes to 1-15/Hidden Valley Pkwy (Project#7) Off Coal Canyon Crossing County Line Green River Rd On Off Off Lanes shown are for the SR-711SR-91 interchange east to north flyover connector for SR-71, and connector from Green River Road to EB SR-91 (Project #5) On I Off Ultimate project widens all SR-91 lanes to standard lane and shoulder widths from SR-241 to SR-71 Auto Center Dr A On Off On* Maple St Lincoln Av Main 5t /14 A Off On Off' Off On Off' On' V Serfas Club Dr Lane shown is for Green River Rd EB SR-91 On -Ramp (Project #5) i On Off On On Off Lff On Off 3-Lane CD Road from Main St EB On -Ramp braid to join SR-91 as a merge ramp (Project #1) V On' From Main St On On* From SB 1-15 4 Off to NINSB 1-15 McKinley St Pierce St On i On On Off On Off From From V SB NB 1-15 1-15 Express Lanes to 1-151Cajalco Rd (by RCTC 1-15 ELP) ouroRmtA 91 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 100 21 SECTION 3: APPENDIX A - PosT-203 5 AND CONCEPTUAL PROJECTS Concepts for potential Post-2035 implementation (potentially earlier if funding becomes available) focus on longer -lead time projects. This multi -billion dollar program may indude: an elevated 4-lane facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR 241 to 1-15; the Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail; the Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-lane facility from SR 241/SR 133 to I-15/Cajalco Road (formerly known as MIS Corridor B), \AB SR 91 to SB SR 55 Connector Improvements, and EB SR 91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR 241 Theec potential concepts indude significant environmental constraints and right of way requirements in addition to requiring a significant amount of planning, design, and future policy and public input. The MIS Corridor A concept may incorporate projects being developed in the earlier programs as concept components. Appendix Concept No. Concept Summary (Implementation Year) Cost ($IV) A-1 Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MS Corridor A) from SR 241 to 1-15 (Post-2035) 2,720 A-2 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev high Speed Rail (Post-2035) 2,770-3,200 A-3 Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-Lane Facility faun SR 241/SR 133 to I-15✓CajalCo Road (Post-2035) 8,855 A-4 VVB SR 91 to SB SR-55 Connector Improvements (Post-2035) 75-150 A-5 EB SR 91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR 241 31 SUBTOTAL 14,451-14,956 FULL TON TON I PLACENTIA RANGI YORBA LINDA ANAHEIM CHINO HILLS LY11 Figure 3-1- Surrrrlary of Concepts for Post-20351mp1errentation „ALLA PPARK /NORCO CORONA ICE Corridor To/From SR-241/SR-133 2017 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 22 101 Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15 Concept No: A-9 Anticipated Completion: Post-2035 Concept Cost Estimate** Capital Cost* $1,488,000,000 Support Cost (25%) $372,000,000 RIW Cost $860,000,000 Total Project Cost $2,720,000,000 Concept Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD * Capital costs include $180M for environmental mitigation excluding corresponding support cost, which is included in support cost estimate **Costs derived from Riverside County - ❑range County MIS, January 2005 (2005 dollars) Q. Concept Description The improvements primarily consist of constructing a new 4-lane elevated expressway near or within the Santa Ana Canyon with freeway -to -freeway connectors at SR-241 and 1-15. The facility may include managed lanes and potential reversible operations. Key Considerations Choice of alignment will be key to determining net capacity increase. Extensive right-of-way (RlW) will be required to implement the improvements if the alignment is not in the SR-91 corridor. When median connector projects or HOVIHOT projects are constructed and this 4-lane elevated facility is proposed within the median of SR-91 through Corona, then extensive managed lane closures would be required during construction (thus temporarily reducing SR-91 capacity during construction). An alternative could be studied for the median Corridor A viaduct along with reduced SR-91 geometric standards to minimize RAW impacts. Also, direct connectors (such as for High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) A High Occupancy Toll (HOT) at 1-15ASR-91} to/from the median could be precluded by Maglev columns located within the same median area. Caltrans and Maglev highway RAW, maintenance, safety, and operations considerations would need to be analyzed if shared use with a Maglev facility were pursued. Additional mitigation costs may be required for improvements to SR-241 and SR-133 as a result of additional Corridor traffic volumes. Corridor A as managed lanes, with the extension of 91 Express Lanes to 1-15, this project concept may affect traffic distrib- ution due to "parallel' tolled facilities. Benefits The concept would provide significant congestion relief by allowing vehicles to bypass the at -grade freeway lanes and local arterial interchanges between SR-241 and 1-15. Connections are proposed directly between SR-91, SR-241, and 1-15. 0.nEsa c Uvo Lasies - c Ca 1-ones OrnU .4, --- 1 ��: =.' Abbreviations: WS = Westbound EB = Eastbound Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) Cross -Section Current Status This concept is identified in the Riverside County - Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) as part of the Locally Preferred Strategy to improve mobility between Riverside County and Orange County. No project development work is planned at this time 91 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 23 102 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail Concept No: A-2 Anticipates! Completion: 2035 Concept Cost Estimate* Total Capital Cost, Low $ 2,770,000,000 Total Capital Cost, High $ 3,200,000,000 Concept Schedule To be determined Concept costs from American Magline Group (2012 dollars) Concept Description Proposals for a new super -speed train corridor from Anaheim to Ontario are included in this concept. This concept includes an alternative that would use SR-91 right-of-way, or would be aligned adjacent to SR-91 right-of-way, or could potentially be co -located with the Major Investment Study (MIS) Corridor A (Concept #A-1) alignment. Another alignment opportunity is being investigated along SR-57_ Key Considerations Alternative alignment impacts to SR-91 right-of-way envelope anchor Santa Ana River are undetermined. The choice of alignment will potentially impact MIS Corridor A (Concept #A-1). Right-of-way (RNLI) will be required to implement the improvements. Potential considerations for co -locating the Magnetic Levitation (Maglev) train adjacent to Corridor A (and also SR-91) include providing a two -column structure with a barrier between the trains and vehicles. Ca!trans and Maglev highway RIW, maintenance, safety, and operations considerations would need to be analyzed if shared use with a Maglev facility were pursued. See the MIS Corridor A project for additional considerations. Coordination with Metrolink improvements will be required. Benefits The concept would provide congestion relief by providing a direct high-speed/high-capacity connection with Ontario International Airport for Orange County air passengers and business next -day deliveries. Maglev will make the trip in just 14.5 minutes. Relieves congestion on SR-91 by providing additional capacity in the corridor. Current Status Preliminary design, engineering and Phases 1 and 2 of a Preliminary Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Statement (PEISIEIS) are completed. Congress has approved $45M in SAFETEA-LU for the environmental phase of the project. The Anaheim to Ontario segment its included in the "Constrained" Plan of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) passed in April 2012. Construction funding of up to $7 billion has been identified through a loan commitment from the China Export -Import Bank. LEGEND Existing Highway - High Speed Rail Representative Alignment REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY �pIAFORMl� 91 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 103 24 Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-Lane Facility from SR-241ISR-133 to I-151Cajalco Road Concept No: A-3 Anticipated Completion: Post-2035 Concept Cast Estimate* Capital Cost Support Cost R1W Cost Total Project Cost Concept Schedule Geotechnical Feasibility Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 7,675,000,000 $ 880,000,000 $ 300,000,000 $ 8,855,000,000 Completed TBD TBD TBD TBD * Costs derived from the Feasibility Evaluation Report (2009 dollars) l LEGEND Existing Highway ICE (Corridor 8) Representative Alignment 1 NOTE: REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY Concept Description The improvements primarily consist of constructing a highway and rail facility through the Cleveland National Forest with freeway -to -freeway connectors at SR-2411SR-133 and I-15/Cajalco Road. The facility would essentially be a continuation of SR-133 on the west end of the corridor, to 1-15 on the east end. Key Considerations The tunnel concept is technically feasible based on the geotechnical investigation completed in December 2009. The initial project phase would be the construction of one 2-lane highway tunnel and one rail tunnel. The second project phase would include construction of a second 2-lane highway tunnel. Additional technical studies and geotechnical borings would be needed to refine the tunnel alignments and grades. Costs associated with the Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) tunnels are based on the Feasibility Evaluation Report completed in December 2009. A financial analysis will be needed for the construction, operations and toll requirements of the ICE tunnels. Benefits The concept would provide significant congestion relief by providing an alternative route between Orange and Riverside counties and would allow vehicles to bypass SR-91 between SR-241 and 1-15. The concept would not disrupt SR-91 traffic during construction and would allow for additional route selection for incident management, emergency evacuation, and for continuity of the highway network by linking SR-133 to 1-15. Current Status On August 27, 2010 the Riverside Orange Corridor Authority Board took action to defer additional study of the ICE concept until such time as financial considerations improve and/or technological advancements warrant reexamination. Review of the concept shall be done annually through the SR-91 Implementation Plan update to determine if any of the major assumptions with regard to financial considerations, private sector interest, or technological advancements have changed to make the tunnel financially viable. (See "ICE status summary" for further discussion). ICE (CORRIDOR BJ 91 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 25 104 WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 Connector Improvements Concept No: A-4 Anticipated Completion: Post-2035 Concept Cost Estimate" Total Project Cost, Low $ 75,000,000 Total Project Cost, High $ 150,000,000 Concept Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Note: Project costs derived from the SR-91 PSRfPDS between SR-57 and SR-55 (2014 Dotlars), and excludes support and RfW costs. Concept Description The project consists of operational improvements by modifying the connector to SB SR-55 from VVB SR-91_ The improvements would extend to Lakeview Avenue to the east and would include a new connector from We SR-91 to SB SR-55 as a potential right-hand exit_ Key Considerations Right-of-way impacts, detailed SR-55fSR-91 interchange improvements, and downstream impacts to SR-55 require further evaluation in a subsequent phase of project development_ Conceptual design of SR-55/SR-91 would be coordinated with completed improvements at SR-91 and Tustin Avenue (Project 4B-5), and with the SR-91 Environmental Study Improvements from SR-57 to SR-55 (Project #6)_ The study for Project 46 is currently being conducted which includes the SR-55iSR-91 interchange area, however, that project's objective is to primarily improve operations of the SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-57. Operational enhancements between SR-55 and Lakeview Avenue by Project 46 may provide some benefit for SIR-55/SR-91 by addressing WB SR-91 weaving issues. Benefits Interchange improvements are anticipated to provide congestion relief for SR-91 traffic and potentially improve the connection from WB SR-91 to sa SR-55. Current Status SR-55/SR-91 project information was derived from the Final Alternatives Evaluation and Refinement Report, December 2005, by the Riverside County - Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS). Focused SR-911SR-55 conceptual engineering needs to be scheduled. However, initial conceptual engineering was also studied as part of the SR-91 Feasibility Study Between State Route 57 and State Route 55 Interchange Areas in June 2009. PLA ENTIA r ns pi trfis neap un YOREIA LINDA VIt LA PARK a�t�Alf �lvl SR-55/SR-91 Interchange improvements yrighrea uyThurias Eirrrish1aus dYi ;h11N )HI__. proddue dvYILh uerrnssiuri CORONA NORO ,,OF 0 RJybi, 91 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 105 26 E6 SR-91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR-241 Concept No: A-5 Anticipated Completion: TBD Concept Cost Estimate* Capital Cost Support Cost (25%) RIW Cost Total Project Cost Concept Schedule Conceptual Engineering Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 25,000,000 6,250,000 $0 $ 31,250,000 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD This project currently does not have an identified funding source(s) for any of the project development phases; however, District 12 has indicated this is one of its top priority projects. LEGEND - Existing Highway - Interchange/Ramp A Tolled Express Lane am Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane Project#3 Improvements Weir Canyon Rd Off On Off Lanes shown are for the SR-241/91 Express Connector (Project #3) Concept Description The location of the proposed EB SR-91 fifth general purpose (GP) lane addition (The Segment) is on EB SR-91 from Weir Canyon Road to the NB SR-241 Connector. The Segment consists of 4 (four) GP lanes and 2 (two) managed lanes (91 Express Lanes). Upstream (westerly) from The Segment the EB SR-91 has 5 GP lanes and the 5th lane drops to the SB SR-241 Connector as some traffic volume exits to the SB SR-241. Downstream from The Segment the EB SR-91 gains the 5th lane back as the NB SR-241 Connector merges with SR-91 in a dedicated lane addition. This 5th lane continues beyond the Riverside County line providing enhanced mobility. Key Considerations This segment with 4 GP lanes might be creating a traffic choke point due to the decrease of capacity, potentially contributing to significant traffic delays passing through this segment along with other traffic issues such as queue jumping, weaving, merging and operational speed differential. However, additional traffic from NB SR-241 to EB SR-91 and Gypsum Canyon Rd on -ramp suggest balancing the number of lanes should be carefully examined. As such, additional capacity will enhance EB freeway operations along this Segment. Benefits 1. Extends the existing 5th EB GP lane easterly and ties it to the existing 5th lane downstream. This could provide capacity enhancement and may result in removing an existing choke point. Significant delay savings is anticipated. 2. Potentially eliminate queue jumping in this area from EB SR-91 as well as Weir Canyon Rd. 3. Potentially reduce speed differential between through lanes, thus creating a more balanced flow. 4. Potentially provide lane balance at high traffic demand area. Gypsum Canyon Rd On Off Off On Current Status Additional traffic analysis and study is required to confirm the benefits to EB SR-91 by the proposed improvements. This location was identified by Caltrans as a high congestion location in the County. The concept is intended to improve the choke point that exists due to the presence of a 4 lane segment between 5 lane freeway segments. This project currently does not have an identified funding source for any of the project development phases; however, this concept is a District 12 top priority project. 91 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 27 106 SECTION4: APPENDIX B - COMPLETED PROJECT EXHIBITS The following exhibits represent completed projects from previous Plans since 2006, and are intended to be used as a reference to illustrate the progress made since the inception of the Plan. Note: some projects listed in the Plan as completed (see Section 1, Project Accorrplishments) are not induded herein since there was no exhibit created or necessary for use with prior Plans (such as for restriping projects, various safety enhancements, minor operational improvements, etc.). Appendix Project No. 1 Project Improvements Constructed March 2009 B-1 Green Ryer Road Overcxossing Replaoerrent 13-2 North Main Street corona Metrdink Station Parking Structure June 2009 B-3 Eastbound Lane Addition from SR 241 to SR 71 September 2010 B-4 Wden SR 91 between SR 55 and SR 241 by Adding a 5w GP Lane in Each Direction December 2012 B-5 SR 91 V\B Lane at Tustin Avenue April 2016 B-6 Metrolink Service Improvements June 2016 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 28 107 Green River Road Overcrossing Replacement Appendix Project No: B-1 Actual Completion: March 2009 Project Costs Capital Cost Support Cost RIW Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 21,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $301,000 $ 24,301,000 Completed Completed Completed Completed �putaRw1� 91 Project Schedule Caltrans Equivalents: Preliminary Engineering = RID Environmental = PA/ED Design = PS&E Abbreviations: CD = Collector Distributor Lane FTR = Future HOV = High Occupancy Vehicle SHLD = Shoulder 77' 138' i , I 1 � .� I i ? 117/ 1 1w eNn• W ; w med uaE V1!! UMl1 LAM LANE 114. LIIE I ufi£ IV ! fY ; 1 . ! IP' 1 6' 1P' ; '" 12 1 1Y ! u. 12 fY 14'% 1l' E YYU Project Description Improvements primarily consist of replacing the existing Green River Road overcrossing with a new six -lane wide, 4-span overcrossing to accommodate future widening of SR-91. The interior spans will accommodate up to eight mainline lanes in each direction including two HOV lanes. The exterior spans can accommodate two lanes, either for auxiliary lanes or collector distributor roads. Entrance and exit ramps will be realigned and widened to accommodate the new bridge, yet the interchange will retain its current configuration. New signals will be installed at the ramp intersections. Ramp and bridge improvements will be constructed within existing right of way. Key Considerations Design interface is required with the Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71, SR-711SR-91 Interchange Improvements, SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project, and SR-2411SR-91 HOV/HOT Connector. Benefits The project will improve the level of service at ramp and local street intersections at the interchange. Improvements will reduce ramp queues that extend into the freeway's general purpose lanes, thus contributing to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status The project began construction in March 2007 and was completed in March 2009. 138' 79' L41JIIEI LN!!`LMT!1 lMEI761r:A I F111 (D { CO i01 12'141 17: 17 1 17 t7•; 171 171 WI t 171 1i 61711E1'J EB �^ GREEN RIVER BRIDGE CROSS-SECTION NOTE: All dimensions are approximate 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 29 108 North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station Parking Structure Appendix Project No: B-2 Actual Completion: June 2009 Project Costs Capital Cost $ 20,000,000 Support Cost $ 5,000,000 RIW Cost $0 Total Project Cost $ 25,000,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction Completed Completed Completed Completed Project Description The project provides a six level parking structure with 1,065 parking stalls. The construction is within the existing North Main Street Metrolink station property in Corona. Key Considerations Proposed improvements were constructed within existing right of way. Currently there are 700 users of the facility, 200 more that were previously able to accomodate. Additionally RCTC has opened up the lot to park and ride carpools and vanpools and has issued over 120 permits for carpoolers to use the expanded station. This shows an added benefit of supporting carpooling as well as transit to offset congestion on SR-91. Benefits Demand for parking currently exceeds the capacity at the North Main Street Corona station. New parking capacity will allow Metrolink ridership to increase thereby diverting vehicle trips from SR-91. Current Status Construction was initiated in January 2008 and was completed in June 2009. The project was funded with Federal Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds. PLACENTIA �n I- . 'S5i Irr nsoft NGE Fs map co YORBA LI NDA VILLA PARK ANAHEIM pynghted by Thomas Bros Maps an CHINO HILLS i. 0- •r Metrcll'nk Parking Struclu 241 produced with permission 4 CiOR ONA NORCO 8 �puvaRwi� 91 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 30 109 Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71 Appendix Project No: B-3 Actual Completion: September 2010 Project Cost Estimate Capital Cost Support Cost RIW Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 41,000,000 $ 8,000,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 51,200,000 Completed Completed Completed Completed LEGEND Existing Highway ,1 Interchange/Ramp County Line - HOV or HOT Lane Existing Lane _ki Project Improvement Lane Existing Interchange On e Gypsum Canyon Rd Doff On aft L 1 WOMB- �puvaRwi� 91 Project Description The project will provide an additional eastbound (EB) lane from the SR-911SR-241 interchange to the SR-71ISR-91 interchange and will widen all EB lanes and shoulders to standard widths. Key Considerations Coordination with the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Projects (Project #3 and #11) will be required. Staged construction would be required for all ramp reconstruction and freeway widening. Freeway operations would most likely be affected by this project, however, freeway lane closures are not anticipated. An EB concrete shoulder will be constructed with a 12 foot width to provide for future widening as contemplated by Project #3 and #11. Benefits The lane addition would help to alleviate the weaving condition between SR-241 and SR-71, as well as remove vehicles from the SR-91 mainline that would be exiting at Green River Road and SR-71. Current Status Funding is from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) with $71.44M approved, and the balance of project costs are from other sources. Construction began in late 2009 and was completed in September 2010. Coal Canyon WLC IVL. r�1 I Off - On I Off�� �On County Line Green River Rd 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 31 110 Widen SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-241 by Adding a 5th GP Lane in Each Direction Appendix Project No: B-4 Actual Completion: January 2013 Project Costs Capital Cost Support Cost R!W Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 65,005,000 $ 19,639,000 $ 573,000 $ 85,217,000 Completed Completed Completed Completed LEGEND Existing Highway Interchange/Ramp Existing Interchange HOV or HOT Lane Existing Lane Al Project Improvement Lane Auxiliary Lane our.„.2, 91 Off l Lakeview Av On Off L On Off On Off On Off Project Description This project proposes capacity and operational improvements by adding one general purpose (GP) lane on eastbound (EB) SR-91 from the SR-551 SR-91 connector to east of the Weir Canyon Road interchange and on westbound (WB) SR-91 from just east of Weir Canyon Road interchange to the Imperial Highway (SR-90) interchange. Additionally, this project would facilitate truck traffic approaching the truck scales in both directions. Key Considerations Caltrans is not considering relocation of the truck scales at this time. Benefits Alleviates congestion on WB SR-91 by eliminating the lane drop at the truck scales and providing a continuous GP lane to SR-90. Alleviates congestion an EB SR-91 by eliminating the lane drop for northbound (NB) SR-55 at SR-91 by providing an auxiliary lane to Lakeview Avenue, and at SR-90 by providing a continuous GP lane through Weir Canyon Construction was completed in January 2013. The project received $22M of Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) funding and $74M of State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Augmentation funds. Truck Scales On Off On Off Gypsum Weir Canyon Rd On / Canyon Rd ___[ On Off On Off On Off On On Dff�i Off NOTE: FAIRMONT BLVD IS CONTINGENT UPON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 32 111 SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue Appendix Project No: B-5 Actual Completion: April 2016 Project Cost Estimate* Capital Cost Support Cost RNV Cost Total Project Cost Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction $ 22,218,000 $ 16,382,000 $ 4.682,00G $ 43,282,000 Completed Completed Completed Completed LEGEND Existing Highway Inferchange/Ramp County Line p HOV Lane A• Tolled Express Lane SIC Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane Cpl1i8RN�� 91 Lakeview Av Off On Project description The project will add a westbound (WB) auxiliary lane on SR-91 beginning at the northbound (NB) SR-55 to WB SR-91 connector through the Tustin Avenue interchange. This project includes approximately 1.1 lane miles. Key Considerations Build Alternative 3 was selected from the Project Study Report (PSR), On Westbound (WB) SR-91 Auxiliary Lane from the Northbound (NB) SR-551WB SR-91 Connector to the Tustin Avenue interchange, and requires additional right-of-way. City of Anaheim utilities are within close proximity of the proposed widening section. Widening of the Santa Ana River bridge is required. Coordination with the City of Anaheim occurred for widening of Tustin Avenue and the WB SR-91 Off -Ramp that was completed in early 2011. Benefits The project would reduce or eliminate operational problems and deficiencies on this section of WB SR-91 including weaving and merging maneuvers. This project would also address choke -point conditions, which are caused primarily by extensive weaving between the NB SR-55 to WB SR-91 connector and the WB SR-91 off -ramp to Tustin Avenue. Current Status Preliminary engineering was completed and approved by Caitrans. The environmental phase was completed in November 2010, and design was completed in mid-2013. Construction was initiated in February 2014. The project received $14M from the Proposition 18 State -Local Partnership Program (SLPP), $14M from Measure M, with the balance from Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds. Contract acceptance and open to traffic in May 2016. Tustin Av On Off WB SR-91 Tustin Av On Off d NMI 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 33 112 Metrolink Service Improvements Appendix Project No: B-6 Actual Completion: 2016 Project Cost Estimate* IEOC Service Cost Perris Valley Line Cost Total Metrolink Costs Project Schedule Complete 2016 $ 1,160,000 $ 248,000,000 $ 249,160,000 Costs from OCTA and RCTC (in 2015 dollars) Project Description Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and the Riverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC) are coordinating on the implementation of additional commuter rail service on the Inland Empire — Orange County (IEOC) Line, which operates between Oceanside and San Bernardino. The ongoing success of the IEOC Line service and significant freeway construction on parallel corridors would bolster potential growth on Metrolink. Currently, there are sixteen (16) daily trains that run on the IEOC Line and nine (9) trains running on the 91 Line for a total of 25 daily trains. There will be an additional two IEOC roundtrips by late 2015. The long-term service improvements will include 24 IEOC trains by 2030. Construction began in October 2013 and was opened to riders in early in early 2016 on the $248,300,000 Perris Valley Line (PVL), which will expand Metrolink commuter rail service on the 91 Line (Riverside to Los Angeles, via Fullerton). The new service will extend 24 miles from downtown Riverside to south Perris and will add four new stations along the route. The PVL is expected to open to riders by December 2015. The project is located within the right of way of the existing San Jacinto Branch Line through Riverside, Moreno Valley and Perris. The PVL is the first extension of Metrolink service since the Antelope Valley Line was built in 1994. The initial schedule (December 2015) has nine trains through to Los Angeles and 12 between Perris and Riverside. Key Considerations The long-term plan (by 2030) adds more service by constructing additional stations. The City of Anaheim is also proposing Anaheim Canyon Station improvements for a second track and platform to be implemented as part of the long-term plan. The City of Placentia is currently in the environmental phase for a new Metrolink commuter rail passenger station and parking lot to be constructed as part of the long-term plan. Benefits Enables development of expanded Metrolink service and improves efficiency, which will contribute to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status Two additional IEOC Line roundtrips were added in late 2015 and nine trains from the expanded PVL were added early 2016. DAILY TRAINS Existing: 25 2016: 27 YORBA LINDA PLACENTIA Trains to Cos Angeles Trains to Central/ via Fullerton South Orange County ANAHEIM DAILY TRAINS Existing: 16 2016: 18 Bernardino CHINO HILLS 1 CORONA NORCO 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 34 113 SECTION 5: REFERENCES The following documents and resources were used in the development of the 2017 Plan. Data was provided by OCTAy ROTC, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12, Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA), other agencies and online resources. Measure M Next 10 Delivery Plan (Next 10 Plan), Noverrber 14, 2016 Rverside Transit Agency, Ten -Year Transit Network Plan, January 22, 2015 PSR PDS on Route 91 Between SR 57 and SR 55, October 2014 PS&E for "Westbound State Route 91 Auxiliary Lane from the NB SR-55/WB SR-91 Connector to the Tustin Avenue Interchange", 2014 PS&E for Initial SR-91 GP Project, 2014 Califomia Transportation Commission, Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), Amended December 2012 M2020 Plan (Measure M), September 2012 PSR PDS for SR 241/SR 91 Connector, January 2012 Project Report and Environmental Document (ElR/EIS) for SR-91 GPfrom SR 241 to Pierce Street Project, October 2012 PS&E "On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR 55 Interchange and the SR 91/SR 241 Interchange in Orange County", April 2011 Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Orange County SR-91 Corridor Final Report, August 2010 Project Study Report/Project Report "Right of Way Relinquishment on Westbound State Route 91 Between Weir Canyon Road and Coal Canyon", May 2010 SR-91/Fairmont Boulevard Foo.,ibiIity Study, Decerrber 2009 Feasibility Evaluation Report for Irvine -Corona Expressway Tunnels, December 2009 Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS8E) for Eastbound SR-91 lane addition from SR 241 to SR 71, May 2009 PSR "On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR 55 Interchange and the SR 91/SR 241 Interchange in Orange County', April 2009 91 Express Lanes Extension and State Route 241 Connector Feasibility Study, March 2009 PSR/PR "On Gypsum Canyon Road Between the Gypsum Canyon Road/SR-91 Mstbound OFF Ramp (PM 16.4) and the Gypsum Canyon RoacVSR 91 Eastbound Direct Or -Ramp (PM 16.4)", June 2008 Orange County Transportation Authority Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan, November 2006 Rverside County -Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) - Final Project Report: Locally Preferred Strategy Report, January 2006 Califomia - Nevada Interstate Maglev Project Report, Anaheim-Cntario Segment; Califomia-Nevada Super Speed Train Commission, American Magline Group, August 2003 Route Concept Reports for SR-91, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 Various Preliminary Drawings and Cross Sections, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan 35 114 AGENDA ITEM 7H RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Mark Lancaster, Right of Way Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: State Routes 71/91 Interchange — City of Corona Utility Agreement WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 17-31-108-00 with the city of Corona (Corona) for utility relocation related to the State Routes 71/91 interchange in the revised amount of $855,961, plus a revised contingency amount of $102,939, for a revised total amount not to exceed $958,900; 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required for these services; and 4) Approve an increase of $428,900 in FY 2017/18 budgeted federal revenues and right of way expenditures for utility relocation costs. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission completed the final design on the 71/ 91 interchange in Corona. The project includes constructing a new direct freeway connector ramp from eastbound SR-91 to northbound SR-71 and reconfiguring the eastbound SR-91 entrance ramp between Green River Road and the 71/91 interchange. The project will require the Commission to enter into final engineering and construction utility agreements with the various utility owners to relocate underground and overhead telecommunication facilities, underground and overhead electrical facilities, and underground water pipelines. The utility facilities will be relocated both prior to and concurrent with project construction activities. At its April 2016 meeting, the Commission approved utility agreements with AT&T, Corona, Southern California Edison, and Sprint, as well as a preliminary engineering utility agreement with Southern California Gas Company for the final design of the underground natural gas Agenda Item 7H 115 transmission pipeline relocation. The approved agreement with Corona was to relocate an underground water pipeline within the BNSF Railway (BNSF) right of way in the amount of $170,175, plus a contingency of $42,544 for a total amount not to exceed $212,719. When Corona applied for a permit from BNSF in late April 2016, BNSF stated the new water line was subject to its current licensing fee, which resulted in an increase in the cost by $300,000. The license allows the pipeline to remain in the BNSF right of way in perpetuity. In addition, Corona updated its estimate to include additional costs for design and design oversight, flagging, material inspection, construction inspection, and additional staff time. In June 2016, the Commission approved a revised utility agreement in the amount not to exceed $736,032. Corona went out to bid for the project on April 17, 2017. A letter of final estimated construction costs was received from Corona dated May 3. That letter indicated Trautwein Construction Inc.'s bid of $411,550 was the lowest responsible bid received by Corona. Corona also detailed other project costs, such as construction support, BNSF license fees, and other BNSF costs and contingency, which totaled up to $855,961. The attached utility agreement allows Corona to exceed estimated construction costs by 125 percent, resulting in a revised contingency of $102,939. Therefore, staff recommends an increase in the the utility agreement of $222,868 over the June 2016 amount for a total not to exceed amount of $958,900. Staff recommends the Commission authorize a revised Agreement No. 17-31-108-00 amount with Corona of $855,961 plus a revised contingency of $102,939, for a revised total amount not to exceed $958,900. The increased cost for this utility relocation will be funded by federal earmark funds; however, only $530,000 for acquisition support is currently included in the FY 2017/18 budget. Accordingly, staff requests an adjustment of $428,900 to increase the federal revenues and acquisition support costs in the FY 2017/18 budget. Staff also recommends the Commission authorize the Executive Director to execute the utility agreement on behalf of the Commission and authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve the use of contingency as may be required. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes No Year: FY 2017/18 Amount: $530,000 $428,900 I Source of Funds: Federal earmarks Budget Adjustment: No Yes GL/Project Accounting No.: 0030218140gq2 00068 0000 262 3181402 $428,900 Fiscal Procedures Approved: �iAiz Date: 06/19/2017 Attachment: Utility Agreement 17-31-108-00 (Draft) Agenda Item 7H 116 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Page 1 of UTILITY AGREEMENT (RCTC AGREEMENT NO: 16-31-070-00) RW 13-5 (REV 9/2014) DISTRICT 08 COUNTY RIV FEDERAL AID NUMBER HPLU21 LN 6054 (066) ROUTE 91/71 POST MILE RIV-91-R0.9/R2.6; RIV-71-1.9/R3.0 ID OF541/0800000137 OWNER'S FILE NUMBER FEDERAL PARTICIPATION On the project ® YES ❑ NO On the Utilities ® YES ❑ NO UTILITY AGREEMENT NO. 23279 DATE The Riverside County Transportation Commission, herein after called "RCTC", proposes to improve the existing SR 91/SR 71 interchange in the City of Corona, Riverside County. The proposed improvements include constructing a new direct flyover connector from eastbound SR 91 to northbound SR 71 and reconfiguring the eastbound SR 91 ramp between Green River Road and the SR 91/71 interchange. and City of Corona 400 S. Vicentia Avenue Corona, CA 92880 hereinafter called "OWNER," owns and maintains 16" water line adjacent to Prado Road within the limits of RCTC's project which requires relocation of 16" water line to avoid conflicts with proposed Green River On -Ramp Overhead bridge bent. to accommodate RCTC's project It is hereby mutually agreed that: I. WORK TO BE DONE In accordance with Notice to Owner No. 23279 dated April 14, 2016 OWNER shall relocate the 16" water line adjacent to Prado Road. All work shall be performed substantially in accordance with OWNER's Plan No. 2015-01 dated January 20, 2017 consisting of 3 sheets, a copy of which is on file at RCTC. Deviations from the OWNER's plan described above initiated by either RCTC or the OWNER, shall be agreed upon by both parties hereto under a Revised Notice to Owner. Such Revised Notices to Owner, approved by RCTC and agreed to/acknowledged by the OWNER, will constitute an approved revision of the OWNER's plan described above and are hereby made a part hereof. No work under said deviation shall commence prior to written execution by the OWNER of the Revised Notice to Owner. Changes in the scope of the work will require an amendment to this Agreement in addition to the revised Notice to Owner. 117 UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) RW 13-5 (REV 6/2010) Page 2 of 6 II. LIABILITY FOR WORK Existing facilities are located in their present position pursuant to rights superior to those of the State and will be relocated at RCTC expense. III PERFORMANCE OF WORK OWNER agrees to cause the herein described work to be performed by a contract with the lowest qualified bidder, selected pursuant to a valid competitive bidding procedure, and to furnish or cause to be furnished all necessary labor, materials, tools, and equipment required therefore, and to prosecute said work diligently to completion. Use of out-of-state personnel (or personnel requiring lodging and meal "per diem" expenses) will not be allowed without prior written authorization by RCTC's representative. Requests for such authorization must be contained in OWNER's estimate of actual and necessary relocation costs. OWNER shall include an explanation why local employee or contract labor is not considered adequate for the relocation work proposed. Per Diem expenses shall not exceed the per diem expense amounts allowed under the State's Department of Personnel Administration travel expense guidelines. Work performed directly by Owner's employees falls within the exception of Labor Code Section 1720(a)(1) and does not constitute a public work under Section 1720(a)(2) and is not subject to prevailing wages. OWNER shall verify compliance with this requirement in the administration of its contracts referenced above. Engineering services for locating, making of surveys, preparation of plans, specifications, estimates, supervision, and inspection are to be furnished by the Utility Owner and approved by RCTC. Cost principles for determining the reasonableness and allowability of OWNER's costs shall be determined in accordance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31; 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 645; and 18 CFR, Chapter 1, Parts 101, 201 and OMB Circular A-87, as applicable. IV. PAYMENT FOR WORK RCTC shall pay its share of the actual and necessary cost of the herein described work within 45 days after receipt of five (5) copies of OWNER's itemized bill, signed by a responsible official of OWNER's organization and prepared on OWNER's letterhead, compiled on the basis of the actual and necessary cost and expense incurred and charged or allocated to said work in accordance with the uniform system of accounts prescribed for OWNER by the California Public Utilities Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or Federal Communications Commission, whichever is applicable. It is understood and agreed that RCTC will not pay for any betterment or increase in capacity of OWNER's facilities in the new location and that OWNER shall give credit to RCTC for the "used life" or accumulated depreciation of the replaced facilities and for the salvage value of any material or parts salvaged and retained or sold by OWNER. Not more frequently than once a month, but at least quarterly, OWNER will prepare and submit itemized progress bills for costs incurred not to exceed OWNER's recorded costs as of the billing date less estimated credits applicable to completed work. Payment of progress 118 UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) RW 13-5 (REV 6/2010) Page 3 of 6 bills not to exceed the amount of this Agreement may be made under the terms of this Agreement. Payment of progress bills which exceed the amount of this Agreement may be made after receipt and approval by RCTC of documentation supporting the cost increase and after an Amendment to this Agreement has been executed by the parties to this Agreement. The OWNER shall submit a final bill to RCTC within 360 days after the completion of the work described in Section I above. If RCTC has not received a final bill within 360 days after notification of completion of OWNER's work described in Section I of this Agreement, and RCTC has delivered to OWNER fully executed Director's Deeds, Consents to Common Use or Joint Use Agreements, if required for OWNER's facilities, RCTC will provide written notification to OWNER of its intent to close its file within 30 days and OWNER hereby acknowledges, to the extent allowed by law, that all remaining costs will be deemed to have been abandoned. If RCTC processes a final bill for payment more than 360 days after notification of completion of OWNER's work, payment of the late bill may be subject to allocation and/or approval by RCTC. The final billing shall be in the form of an itemized statement of the total costs charged to the project, less the credits provided for in this Agreement, and less any amounts covered by progress billings. However, RCTC shall not pay final bills which exceed the estimated cost of this Agreement without documentation of the reason for the increase of said cost from the OWNER and approval of documentation by RCTC. Except, if the final bill exceeds the OWNER's estimated costs solely as the result of a revised Notice to Owner as provided for in Section I, a copy of said revised Notice to Owner shall suffice as documentation. In either case, payment of the amount over the estimated cost of this Agreement may be subject to allocation and/or approval by RCTC. In any event if the final bill exceeds 125% of the estimated cost of this Agreement, an Amended Agreement shall be executed by the parties to this Agreement prior to the payment of the OWNER'S final bill. Any and all increases in costs that are the direct result of deviations from the work described in Section I of this Agreement, shall have the prior concurrence of RCTC. Detailed records from which the billing is compiled shall be retained by OWNER for a period of three years from the date of the final payment and will be available for audit by RCTC, State and/or Federal auditors. In performing work under this Agreement, OWNER agrees to comply with the Uniform System of Accounts for Public Utilities found at 18 CFR Part 101, 201, et al., and, to the extent they are applicable to OWNER doing work on the project that is the subject of this Agreement, the Contract Cost Principles and Procedures as set forth in 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 645, and 2 CFR Part 200 et al. If a subsequent RCTC, State and/or Federal audit determines payments to be unallowable, OWNER agrees to reimburse RCTC upon receipt of RCTC's billing. If OWNER is subject to repayment due to failure by RCTC to comply with applicable laws, regulations and ordinances then RCTC will ensure that OWNER is compensated for actual cost in performing work under this agreement. OWNER, at the present time, does not have sufficient funds available to proceed with the relocation of OWNER's facilities provided for herein. It is estimated that the cost of the work provided for by this Agreement and, as hereinafter set forth, is the sum of $855,961. RCTC agrees to advance to OWNER the sum of $855,961to apply to the cost of the work to be 119 UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) RW 13-5 (REV 6/2010) Page 4 of 6 undertaken as provided hereinabove. Said sum of $855,961will be deposited by RCTC with OWNER within 45 days after execution of the Agreement by the parties hereto and upon receipt of an OWNER's bill for the advance. It is further agreed that upon receipt of the monies agreed upon to be advanced by RCTC herein, OWNER will deposit said monies in a separate interest -bearing account or trust fund in state or national banks in California having the legal custody of said monies in accordance with and subject to the applicable provisions of Section 53630, et seq., of the Government Code; and all interest earned by said monies advanced by RCTC shall be remitted to RCTC quarterly, via a separate check, even when the cost of relocation exceeds the advance amount. When the work is completed, OWNER shall send RCTC a Final Bill for reconciliation of the advance. In the event actual and necessary relocation costs as established herein are less than the sum of money advanced by RCTC to OWNER, OWNER hereby agrees to refund to RCTC the difference between said actual and necessary cost and the sum of money that was advanced. The remittance check for the balance of advanced funds will be separate from the remittance check for the earned interest. In the event that the actual and necessary cost of relocation exceeds the amount of money advanced to OWNER, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, RCTC will reimburse OWNER said excess costs upon receipt of an itemized bill as set forth herein. V. GENERAL CONDITIONS All costs accrued by OWNER as a result of RCTC's request of September 4, 2013 to review, study and/or prepare relocation plans and estimates for the project associated with this Agreement may be billed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. If RCTC's project which precipitated this Agreement is canceled or modified so as to eliminate the necessity of work by OWNER, RCTC will notify OWNER in writing and RCTC reserves the right to terminate this Agreement by Amendment. The Amendment shall provide mutually acceptable terms and conditions for terminating the Agreement. OWNER shall submit a Notice of Completion to RCTC within 30 days of the completion of the work described herein. It is understood that said highway is a Federal aid highway and accordingly, 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 645 is hereby incorporated into this Agreement. In addition, the provisions of 23 CFR 635.410, Buy America, are also incorporated into this agreement. The Buy America requirements are further specified in Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21), section 1518; 23 CFR 635.410 requires that all manufacturing processes have occurred in the United States for steel and iron products (including the application of coatings) installed on a project receiving funding from the FHWA. OWNER understands and acknowledges that this project is subject to the requirements of the Buy America law (23 U.S.C., Section 313) and applicable regulations, including 23 CFR 635.410 and FHWA guidance. OWNER hereby certifies that in the performance of this Agreement, for products where Buy America requirements apply, it shall use only such 120 UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) RW 13-5 (REV 6/2010) Page 5 of 6 products for which it has received a certification from its supplier, or provider of construction services that procures the product certifying Buy America compliance. This does not include products for which waivers have been granted under 23 CFR 635.410 or other applicable provisions or excluded material cited in the Department's guidelines for the implementation of Buy America requirements for utility relocations issued on December 3, 2013. THE ESTIMATED COST TO RCTC FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED WORK IS $855,961. 121 UTILITY AGREEMENT (Cont.) RW 13-5 (REV 6/2010) Page 6 of 6 SIGNATURE PAGE TO UTILITY AGREEMENT NUMBER 23279 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above parties have executed this Agreement the day and year above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION OWNER: COMMISSION City of Corona By By ANNE MAYER Date Name Date Executive Director Title APPROVAL AS TO FORM: BEST, BEST & KRIEGER LLP By Name Date General Counsel APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: By 17Lt;-e( QtA/"— ltin Nicole Deluca Date Utility Coordinator Parsons 122 AGENDA ITEM 71 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Patricia Castillo, Capital Projects Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Construction Agreement with Hal Hays Construction, Inc. for Riverside - Downtown Commuter Rail Station Improvements WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 17-33-073-00 to Hal Hays Construction, Inc. (Hal Hays), as the lowest responsible, responsive bidder, for the construction of the Riverside -Downtown Commuter Rail Station improvements project (Project) in the amount of $1,063,230, plus a contingency amount of $212,646, for a total amount not to exceed $1,275,876; 2) Find the Braughton Construction, Inc. (Braughton) bid non -responsive for failure to meet the Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) goal or Good Faith Efforts (GFE) requirements related to the federal funding on the Project; 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required by the project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Riverside -Downtown Station was originally built in 1993 and increasingly serves as a hub for intermodal connections. Amenities are needed to accommodate increased pedestrian and bicycle patronage and increased transit services. The Project includes the relocation of ticket vending machines to accommodate the increased number of passengers accessing the machines; the installation of shade canopies to protect the new machines as well as patrons; a storage building; an access aisle for passenger loading and unloading zone; reconstruction of parking access curb ramps in accordance with the latest Americans with Disabilities Act standards; and the addition of three bus bays. The Project is funded with federal Surface Transportation Program funding. Agenda Item 71 123 Procurement Process On April 7, 2017, the Commission advertised Invitation for Bids (IFB) No. 17-33-073-00 for construction of the Project. A public notice was advertised in the Press Enterprise, and the complete IFB, including all contract documents, was posted on the Commission's PlanetBids website, which is accessible through the Commission's website. Electronic mail messages were sent to vendors registered in the Commission's PlanetBids database that fit the IFB qualifications. Fifty-three firms downloaded the IFB. Fourteen are located in Riverside County. A pre -bid conference was held at the Commission's office on April 18, and on May 9, three bids were received and publicly opened. A summary of the bids received is shown in Table A. Table A Construction of Riverside Downtown Commuter Rail Station Improvements Bid Summary Firm (In order from low bid to high bid) Bid Amount Engineer's Estimate $979,947 1 Braughton Construction, Inc. (Rancho Cucamonga) $968,705 2 Hal Hays Construction, Inc. (Riverside) $1,063,230 3 Dalke & Sons Construction, Inc. (Riverside) $1,546,901 The basis for award for a public works contract is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder as defined by the Commission's procurement policy and state law. Federally -funded contracts administered by the Commission are subject to the requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 26, Title 49 entitled Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs. This project is to be funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) with funding to be provided through Caltrans. Thus, the Project must also comply with the Caltrans DBE Program. Pursuant to the relevant federal DBE provisions and the Caltrans DBE Program requirements, the Commission established a 13.2 percent DBE participation goal in the construction bid advertisement for this project. Only a bidder complying with the DBE requirements for this project can be considered fully responsive to the bid. To meet the DBE requirements, bidders must either achieve the DBE goal, or, alternatively, meet the GFE requirement set forth in the invitation for bid. The low bidder, Braughton, did not meet the 13.2 percent DBE goal, and its GFE did not demonstrate adequate efforts made to subcontract with DBE firms. A review of Braughton's GFE was conducted, and staff, in consultation with legal counsel and its DBE compliance consultant, determined Braughton failed to provide evidence of an adequate GFE to utilize DBE firms in compliance with federal funding requirements. As a result, Braughton was informed of the determination, and, in accordance with 49 CFR 26.53, Braughton was provided an opportunity for administrative reconsideration, including an opportunity to provide written documentation or argument concerning the question of whether it made an adequate GFE. At Braughton's request, a meeting to discuss the issues with a staff member who was not Agenda Item 71 124 involved in the GFE determination was scheduled. As a courtesy, prior to the meeting, staff provided Braughton with its analysis of Braughton's DBE GFE compliance review. Subsequently, the meeting was canceled at Braughton's request. Thus Braughton was provided due process related to the GFE finding and chose not to take advantage of the opportunity to contest the Commission's GFE determination. In light of Braughton's failure to meet the GFE, and in order to ensure federal funding eligibility for the Project, staff recommends the Committee and the Commission find the bid nonresponsive. Therefore, after analyzing the three bids per the FHWA/Caltrans analysis process, staff has concluded the bid from Hal Hays' in the amount of $1,063,230, although approximately 8 percent higher than the engineer's estimate for construction, is the lowest responsible and responsive bid received for the Project. Hal Hays exceeded the DBE requirement of 13.2 percent and has committed 16 percent of the total bid price to DBEs. Typically, a rate of 10 percent is used to determine project contingency. Staff is recommending a contingency amount of 20 percent of the total Project amount, or $212,646. Since construction will take place in a fully operational Metrolink station, safety, operational continuity, and customer convenience is of utmost importance. Staff has worked to minimize risks by clearly defining scope and ensuring the plan set is complete and thoroughly reviewed for constructability; however, if complications arise and the contingency is not adequate, such contractual budget issues may delay the project and prevent work from being completed in a timely manner. Furthermore, smaller construction contracts such as this one often require a contingency greater than 10 percent because of changes common to many projects, such as maintaining traffic or overhead charges. Staff recommends award of Agreement No. 17-33-073-00 for the construction of the Project to Hal Hays in the amount of $1,063,230, plus a contingency amount of $212,646 to fund potential change orders and supplemental work, for a total amount not to exceed $1,275,876. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2017/2018 Amount: $1,275,876 Source of Funds: STPL Budget Adjustment: No GL/Project Accounting No.: 004023 81301 265 33 81301 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \14e4-iii.44 Date: 06/20/2017 1) Agreement No. 17-33-073-00 2) Bid Comparison Agenda Item 71 125 ATTACHMENT 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RIVERSIDE DOWNTOWN COMMUTER RAIL STATION IMPROVEMENTS RCTC Agreement No. 17-33-073-00 FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPL-6054 (074) April 7, 2017 BETWEEN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND 1733 6.0601 K\29695231.1 HAL HAYS CONSTRUCTION INC. Contract-1 126 CONSTRUCTION OF RIVERSIDE DOWNTOWN COMMUTER RAIL STATION IMPROVEMENTS RCTC AGREEMENT NO. 17-33-073-00 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Contract is made and entered into this day of , 201_ by and between the Riverside County Transportation Commission (hereinafter called the "Commission") and Hal Hays Construction Inc. (hereinafter called the "Contractor"). This Contract is for that Work described in the Contract Documents entitled CONSTRUCTION OF RIVERSIDE DOWNTOWN COMMUTER RAIL STATION IMPROVEMENTS 2. RECITALS. 2.1 The Commission is a County Transportation Commission organized under the provisions of Sections 130000, et seq. of the Public Utilities Code of the State of California, with power to contract for services necessary to achieving its purpose; 2.2 Contractor, in response to a Notice Inviting Bids issued by Commission on April 7, 2017, has submitted a bid proposal for CONSTRUCTION OF RIVERSIDE DOWNTOWN COMMUTER RAIL STATION IMPROVEMENTS TICKET VENDING EXPANSION AND CART BARN 2.3 Commission has duly opened and considered the Contractor's bid proposal and duly awarded the bid to Contractor in accordance with the Notice Inviting Bids and other Bid Documents. 2.4 Contractor has obtained, and delivers concurrently herewith, Performance and Payment Bonds and evidences of insurance coverage as required by the Contract Documents. 3. TERMS. 3.1 Incorporation of Documents. This Contract includes and hereby incorporates in full by reference this Contract and the following Contract Documents provided with the above referenced Notice Inviting Bids, including all exhibits, drawings, specifications and documents therein, and attachments thereto, all of which, including all addendum thereto, are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part of this Contract: 17336.0601 K\29695 231.1 127 a. NOTICE INVITING BIDS b. INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS c. CONTRACT BID FORMS d. FORM OF CONTRACT e. PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BOND FORMS f. ESCROW AGREEMENT FOR SECURITY DEPOSITS g. CONTRACT APPENDIX PART "A" - Regulatory Requirements and Permits PART "B" — General Conditions PART "C" — Special Provisions (under separate cover) PART "D" - Contract Plans (under separate cover) PART "E" - Contract Compliance Provisions/DBE Requirements PART "F" - Federal Minimum Wage Requirements PART "G" - Federal and Caltrans Requirements for Federal Aid Construction Contracts h. ADDENDUM NO.(S) (N/A or Add Addendum Numbers) 3.2 Contractor's Basic Obligation. Contractor promises and agrees, at his own cost and expense, to furnish to the Commission all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work for the construction of the Riverside Downtown Commuter Rail Station improvements, including TVM relocation, pedestrian shelters, cart barn, and ADA and parking lot upgrades. Notwithstanding anything else in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall complete the Work for a total of ($ ), as specified in the bid proposal and pricing schedules submitted by the Contractor in response to the above referenced Notice Inviting Bids. Such amount shall be subject to adjustment in accordance with the applicable terms of this Contract. All Work shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with the above referenced Contract Documents. 3.3 Period of Performance. Contractor shall perform and complete all Work under this Contract (excluding plant establishment work) within 90 working days of the effective date of the Notice to Proceed, and in accordance with any completion schedule developed pursuant to provisions of the Contract Documents. Contractor agrees that if such Work is not completed within the aforementioned periods, liquidated damages will apply as provided by the applicable provisions of the General Conditions, found in Part "B" of the Contract Appendix. The amount of liquidated damages shall equal one thousand seven hundred dollars ($1,700.00) for each day or fraction thereof, it takes to complete the Work, or specified portion(s) of the Work, over and above the number of days 17336.0601 K\29695 231.1 128 specified herein or beyond the Project Milestones established by approved Construction Schedules. 3.4 Commission's Basic Obligation. Commission agrees to engage and does hereby engage Contractor as an independent contractor to furnish all materials and to perform all Work according to the terms and conditions herein contained for the sum set forth above. Except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents, the Commission shall pay to Contractor, as full consideration for the satisfactory performance by the Contractor of services and obligation required by this Contract, the above referenced compensation in accordance with Compensation Provisions set forth in the Contract Documents. 3.5 Contractor's Labor Certification. (1) Contractor maintains that he is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Work. A certification form for this purpose is attached to this Contract as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference, and shall be executed simultaneously with this Contract. 3.6 Successors. The parties do for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns agree to the full performance of all of the provisions contained in this Contract. Contractor may not either voluntarily or by action of law, assign any obligation assumed by Contractor hereunder without the prior written consent of Commission. 3.7 Notices. All notices hereunder and communications regarding interpretation of the terms of the Contract or changes thereto shall be provided by the mailing thereof by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid and addressed as follows: Contractor: Hal Hays Construction Inc. 4181 Latham St. Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Kirby Hays 17336.0601 K\29695 231.1 Commission: Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, California 92502-2208 Attn: Executive Director 129 Any notice so given shall be considered received by the other party three (3) days after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid, addressed to the parry at the above address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. HAL HAYS CONSTRUCTION INC. RIVERSIDE COUNTY (Contractor Name) TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: By: Name Title Anne Mayer Riverside County Transportation Commission Tax I.D. Number: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 17336.0601 K\29695 231.1 By: Best Best & Krieger LLP Counsel, RCTC 130 ATTACHMENT 2 17518 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISION BID OPENING 2:00 PM, Tuesday, 9 May 2017 RIVERSIDE DOWNTOWN COMMUTER RAIL STATION IMPROVEMENTS TICKET VENDING EXPANSION AND CART BARN RCTC Agreement No. 17-33-073-00 FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPL-6054 (074) BIDDER'S NAME AND ADDRESS 1. Hal Hays Construction, Inc. 4181 Latham St. Riverside, CA 92501 2. Braughton Construction, Inc. 10722 Arrow Route STE 810 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91738 3. Dalke & Sons Construction, Inc. 4585 Allstate Drive Riverside, CA 92501 Engineer's Estimate (EE): Subcontractors of Bidder #2 (Low Bidder) 4D Surface Management Thomas Gilstrap Construction Ground Works Construction Steel Tech Fabrication, Inc Robert Construction Nu Way Masonary Elite Electric, Inc. Rite Way Roofing Corp. Streamline Painting Sheet Metal Systems BID $ $1,063,230.00 $968,705.00 1,546,901.00 $979,947.00 City Yuicapa Riverside Rancho Cucamonga Fontana Norco Riverside Riverside Fontana Moreno Valley Riverside BID RANK COMMENTS 2 $94,525.00 > low bid 1 $11,242.00 < EE 3 $578,196.00 > low bid Work Concrete, Asphalt Patch, Striping Drywall Plumbing Steel Framing for Vending Machine Areas Wood Framing Masonary, Veneer Electrical Roofing Painting Sheet Metal, Metal Roofing 131 Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside Dowitom Metrolink Station, Ticket Vending Exp. ADA Upgrade, Storage Bldg. ITEM NO. QUANTITY ENGINEERS EST. DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE 1 Mobilization - Demobilization 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 2 ADA- Site VVork 1 LS $399,987.00 $399,987.001 3 Vending Machines Canopies 1 LS $373,460.00 $373,460.00 4 Storage Building 1 LS $72,000.00 $72,000.001 5 Electrical 1 LS $114,500.00 $114,500.00 TOTAL (ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE) $979,947.00 Contingency 10% $97,994.70 Total Contract $1,077,941.70 132 Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside Dovuntom Metrolink Station, Ticket Vending Ems. ADA Upgrade, Storage Bldg. ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION gUAfJi11Y Low Bidder- Broughton ZndLow Bidder - Hal Hays 3rdLow Bidder - Dalke $ Sons AVERAGE ENGINEERS EST. 1 Mobilization - Demobilization 1 LS $49,211.00 $12,000.00 $39,693.67 $20,000.00 2 ADA- Ste Vlkxk 1 LS "1::,208.00 $450,230.00 $554,747.00 $431,061.67 $399,987.00 3 Vending Machines Canopies 1 LS $324,786.00 $264,940.00 $326,994.33 $373,460.00 4 Storage Building 1 LS $178,195.00 6$732,855.1 $218,311.00 $209,787.00 $72,000.00 5 8ectrical 1 LS $128,305.00 $103,205.00 $185,408.67 $114,500.00 Total $968,705.00 $1,063,230.00 $1,546,901.00 $1,192,945.33 $979,947.00 Percent +/- Engineer's Estimate: 99% 108% ITEM Na DESCRIPTION ' Low 1 Mobilization - Demobilization $12,000.00 $57,870.00 $39,693.67 2 ADA- Site VNkxk $288,208.00 $554,747.0d $431,061.67 3 Vending Machines Canopies $264,940.00 $391,257.00 $326,994.33 4 Storage Building $178,195.00 $232,855.00 $209,787.0d 5 Electrical $103,205.00 $324,716.0d $185,408.67 158% Bid Items High, Low & Average Comparison 122% 100% $0.00 $100,000.00 $200,000.00 $300,000.00 $400,000.00 $500,000.00 $600,000.00 $12,000.00 1 $39,693.67 ,87 _.11 $288,208.00 $431,061.67 $264,940.00 $326,994.33 1 $178,195.00 BRAUGHTON HAL HAYS DALKE$SONS AVERAGE ENGINEER'S EST. wr Low Bid • Average ■ High Bid Total Bid Comparison $500,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $1,soo,000.00 $2,000,000.00 133 AGENDA ITEM 7J RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Gary Ratliff, Facilities Administrator THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Video Surveillance Storage and Closed Circuit Television Equipment WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Authorize the procurement of video surveillance storage equipment and related closed circuit television (CCTV) equipment through the use of the California Multiple Award Schedules (CMAS) pursuant to the Public Contract Code Section 10299(a) and the Commission's Procurement Policy Manual in the amount of $1.2 million; and 2) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute purchase orders awarded under the terms of the agreements. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission continues to modernize its CCTV security system. In January 2017, staff brought an item to the Commission to upgrade the CCTV cameras and hardware to an all -digital system since the analog system was significantly lower in video quality and support for the older analog system is being phased out. The action also provided for additional cameras along the Perris Valley Line (PVL) and at the new PVL stations. The improvements are now well underway; the Jurupa Valley Station, La Sierra Station, and Perris Downtown Station camera and system upgrades have been completed. Cameras have been installed at the Hunter Park Station and along the PVL rail line crossings at Mt. Vernon and Linden, Spruce and Watkins, Blaine and Watkins, and Big Springs Road. CCTV -stored recordings provide law enforcement the ability to view historic data that assists to identify criminal patterns, identify fault, investigate accidents, and incarcerate offenders. They also assist Commission operations of the stations while providing a sense of security and safety for the customers and protecting both the Commission and customers' assets. Current requirements of Government Code 34090.6 include the storage of video monitoring recordings for at least one year. In order to meet this requirement and assure competitive pricing, staff is recommending authorization of $1.2 million of Proposition 1B grant funds for procurement of Agenda Item 71 134 video surveillance storage equipment and related CCTV equipment through a CMAS agreement pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 10299(a) and the Commission's Procurement Policy Manual. All costs for these capital improvements will be funded by Proposition 1B grant funds. The CMAS contract will allow the review of multiple storage system choices to determine the most cost-effective solution while still maintaining compatibility with current equipment. Utilizing the CMAS contract will allow staff to competitively bid a selected storage system that addresses the current and future retention needs. The competitive bidding price will include installation, setup, and training. At a minimum, three or more price quotes from the CMAS vendor list, including Riverside County CMAS vendors, will be petitioned for the optimal video surveillance storage equipment. Financial Information Yes FY 2017/18 $925 000 In Fiscal Year Budget: N/A Year: FY 2018/19 Amount: $275,000 Source of Funds: Proposition 1B Security Funds Budget Adjustment: No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 004012 90701 XXXXX XXXX 103 24 90701 004011 90701 XXXXX XXXX 103 24 90701 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \litaid,ovi Date: 06/20/2017 Agenda Item 7J 135 AGENDA ITEM 7K RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement for Freeway Service Patrol Tow Truck Service WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 17-45-061-00 to Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. for Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) tow truck services on Interstate 215 Beat Nos. 18 and 19 for a three-year term, and two one-year options to extend the agreement, in the amount of $3,302,812, plus a contingency amount of $165,141, for a total amount not to exceed $3,467,953; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required for these services. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 1986, the Commission established itself as the Riverside County Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (RC SAFE) after the enactment of SB 1199 in 1985. The purpose of the formation of SAFES in California was to provide call box services and, with excess funds, provide additional motorist aid services. Funding for RC SAFE is derived from a one dollar per vehicle registration fee on vehicles registered in Riverside County. Initially, these funds were used only for the call box program. As additional motorist aid services were developed, SAFE funds were also used to provide FSP and the Inland Empire 511 traveler information services as part of a comprehensive motorist aid system in Riverside County. In 1990, Proposition C was passed to fund transportation improvements and to help reduce traffic congestion in California. From this, the FSP program was created by Caltrans, which developed the corresponding Local Funding Allocation Plan to distribute funds to participating jurisdictions. In addition to funding received from Caltrans, agencies are required to contribute a 25 percent local match. For the Commission, SAFE revenues are used to meet this match requirement. Agenda Item 7K 136 The Commission, acting in its capacity as the SAFE, is the principal agency in Riverside County, in partnership with Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol (CHP), managing the FSP program. The purpose of the FSP program is to provide a continuously roving tow services patrol along designated freeway segments (referred to as beats) to relieve freeway congestion and facilitate the rapid removal of disabled vehicles and those involved in minor accidents on local freeways. Contracts to provide FSP tow service are competitively bid as needed for each beat. Currently, the Commission contracts with three tow truck operators to provide service on a total of nine beats Monday through Friday during the peak commute hours, 5:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. (12:30 p.m. on Fridays) to 6:30 p.m. In Fiscal Year 2015/16, FSP performed nearly 37,000 assists. DISCUSSION: Staff sought a competitive solution to award tow service contracts to qualified firms for four of the nine total beats administered by the Commission. Beat No. Beat No. Description Number of Tow Trucks 1 SR-91 Orange County line to Lincoln Avenue 2 (+1 backup truck) 2 SR-91 Lincoln Avenue to Magnolia Avenue 2 (+1 backup truck) 18 1-215 Riverside County line to Alessandro Blvd. 3 (+1 backup truck) 19 1-215 Alessandro Blvd. to SR-74/4th Street 2 (+1 backup truck) Procurement Process Staff determined the weighted factor method of source selection to be the most appropriate for this procurement, as it allows the Commission to identify the most advantageous proposal with price and other factors considered. Non -price factors include elements such as qualifications of firm, personnel, and the ability to respond to the Commission's needs for FSP tow truck services on State Route 91 Beat Nos. 1 and 2 and Interstate 215 Beat Nos. 18 and 19, as set forth under the terms of the request for proposals (RFP) No. 17-45-061-00. RFP No. 17-45-061-00 was released on January 19, 2017. A public notice was advertised in the Press Enterprise, and the RFP was posted on the Commission's PlanetBids website, which is accessible through the Commission's website. Utilizing PlanetBids, emails were sent to 21 firms, 11 of which are located in Riverside County. Additionally, the Commission sent out 122 postcards to firms who have previously expressed interest in tow truck services and/or are on the current CHP rotational tow list. Of the 122 firms, 35 are located in Riverside County. Through the PlanetBids site, nine firms downloaded the RFP; two of these firms are located in Riverside County. One firm — Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. (Colton) — submitted proposals for all four beats prior to the 2:00 p.m. submittal deadline on February 23. The proposals submitted for the four beats were responsive and responsible proposals. Since staff received one proposal for each of the four beats, it reviewed the solicitation specifications for undue restrictiveness and surveyed potential sources that chose not to submit Agenda Item 7K 137 a proposal. Reasons for not submitting a proposal included increased costs in workers' compensation, insurance, minimum wage, and fleet maintenance. Staff concluded the requirements listed in the scope of work and other terms and conditions were not unnecessarily or excessively restrictive, an adequate opportunity to compete was provided, and factors other than the solicitation were responsible for the receipt of one proposal for all four beats. An evaluation committee comprised of the CHP Inland Division, San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, and Commission staff evaluated each proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth in the RFP. On March 16, the evaluation committee interviewed Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. Accordingly, the evaluation committee provided final scoring based on a comprehensive evaluation of each written proposal and interview. Based on the evaluation committee's assessment, the evaluation committee determined Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. to be qualified to perform the work outline in the scope of services for all four beats. Negotiation of Contract Terms, Scope, Schedule, and Cost After the evaluation committee determined Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. to be the most qualified firm to perform the work outlined in the scope of services, staff received a request from Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. to increase the hourly rate that Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. submitted in its proposals for each of the four beats to perform the FSP tow truck services. The justification for the hourly rate increase requested by Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. was due to the recent state legislation. On April 28, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill No. 1, which enacts increases in gas and diesel taxes that will go into effect on November 1. Staff then began negotiations to finalize the hourly rate for each of the four beats to establish a fair and reasonable price. During negotiations, Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. informed Commission staff that it was withdrawing its proposals for Beat Nos. 1 and 2. Staff continued negotiations for Beat Nos. 18 and 19 and agreed with Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. on a fair and reasonable price for the hourly rates on those two beats. Due to Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. withdrawing its proposals from Beat Nos. 1 and 2, staff will issue a new RFP for FSP tow truck services on those beats. Staff Recommendation As a result of the evaluation committee's assessment of the written proposals and interview, the evaluation committee recommends contract award for FSP tow truck services on Beat Nos. 18 and 19 to Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. for a three-year term, and two one-year options in the amount of $3,302,812, plus a contingency of $165,141, for a total amount not to exceed $3,467,953. Agenda Item 7K 138 The total hourly rates for the two beats are presented in the following table: Firm Hourly Rate Beat No. Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. $67.75 18 Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. $67.75 19 The Commission's standard form FSP services agreement will be entered into with Pepe's Towing Service, Inc. subject to any changes approved by the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review. Staff also requests authorization for the Executive Director, or designee, to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes N/A LYear: FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19+ Amount: $ 495,422 $2,972,531 Source of Funds: State of California, SAFE Budget Adjustment: No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 002173 81014 00000 0110 201 45 81002 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \ile4-4d ,� Date: 06/19/2017 Attachment: Standard Form FSP Services Agreement Agenda Item 7K 139 SAMPLE CONTRACT FORM Agreement No. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, ACTING AS THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES, FOR FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL FOR BEAT # X WITHIN RIVERSIDE COUNTY WITH [ CONTRACTOR ] 1. PARTIES AND DATE. 1.1 This Agreement is made and entered into as of day of 2017, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("COMMISSION") acting as the RIVERSIDE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES ("SAFE") and [NAME OF FIRM], a [LEGAL STATUS OF CONTRACTOR e.g., CORPORATION) (referred to herein as "CONTRACTOR"). SAFE and CONTRACTOR are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties". 1.2 The California Highway Patrol herein referred to as "CHP" and California Department of Transportation, herein referred to as "Caltrans" are hereby expressly designated as third -party beneficiaries of CONTRACTOR's performance under this Agreement. 2. RECITALS. 2.1 WHEREAS, COMMISSION is a California County Transportation Commission existing under the authority of Section 130050 et seq. of the California Public Utilities Code; 2.2 WHEREAS, COMMISSION is authorized, pursuant to Section 2550 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code, to act as SAFE for purposes of providing a motorist aid system, including provision of freeway service patrols; 2.3 WHEREAS, SAFE requires the services of a CONTRACTOR to provide the freeway service patrol professional services as described in the Scope of Services; 2.4 WHEREAS, SAFE has determined that CONTRACTOR is best qualified to perform the required services; 2.5 WHEREAS, the CONTRACTOR is able and willing to perform the required services under the terms and conditions of this Contract; 1 140 2.6 WHEREAS, COMMISSION is the short range transportation planning agency for Riverside County, and programs federal, state, and local funds. COMMISSION has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Caltrans and CHP to fund peak period freeway service patrols on selected freeway segments in Riverside County; and 2.7 WHEREAS, Section 21718 (a) of the California Vehicle Code specifically authorized CHP to be responsible for freeway service patrols stopping on freeways for the purpose of rapid removal of impediments to traffic. Article 3, Section 91, of the Streets and Highways Code, states that Caltrans has responsibility to improve and maintain the state highways. Caltrans also has the responsibility for traffic management and removing impediments from the highways. NOW, THEREFORE, for the consideration hereinafter stated, SAFE and CONTRACTOR agree as follows: 3. TERMS. 3.1 General Scope of Services. The purpose of the Freeway Service Patrol ("FSP") program is to provide for the rapid removal of disabled vehicles and vehicles involved in minor accidents from the freeway. Contractor promises and agrees to furnish to SAFE all labor materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately provide the FSP services ("Services"). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations, and the SOP manual (as defined below). 3.1.1. Contract Oversight. Caltrans and CHP will jointly oversee the Services. Both agencies will have responsibility for overseeing Service performance and ensuring that the CONTRACTOR abides by the terms of this Contract. CHP is responsible for dispatch services to incident locations within the CONTRACTOR's patrol limits. The dispatching will be done in accordance with this Contract. A Standard Operating Procedures ("SOP") manual will be given to the CONTRACTOR explaining the types of incidents to which his/her operators may be dispatched. 3.1.2 Beat Descriptions. The FSP will operate on selected freeway segments referred to herein as "beats". Each beat has specific turnaround locations and designated drop locations identified by the CHP. Exhibit "A" shows the specific limits, number of tow trucks, number of back-up trucks and hours of operation, and holidays for the CONTRACTOR's specific beat. SAFE reserves the right to add or delete holidays to the work schedule, provided that SAFE provides CONTRACTOR seven (7) days advanced notice of such addition or deletion. Travel time to and from the beat will be at the expense of the CONTRACTOR. 2 141 3.1.3 Change Orders. At any time during the term of this Contract, SAFE reserves the right to adjust beat specifications to better accommodate demand for the Services, at no cost to SAFE. SAFE may direct such adjustments during the course of this Contract through written change orders, signed by SAFE, setting forth any changes to Exhibit "A". Changes may include a change of the specified beat(s) to other beats that SAFE determines better serve the needs of SAFE, as well as changes to schedules and hours for the beats set forth in Exhibit "A". If warranted, as determined in SAFE's sole discretion, and during the hours of operation of the Services, the CONTRACTOR may be requested to temporarily reassign his/her FSP operators/trucks to locations outside the assigned beat. Such reassignments shall be at no cost to SAFE. 3.1.4. The SOP Manual. To promote a safe work environment and for the maintenance of professionalism, the most current version of the SOP manual shall, at all times, be followed by the CONTRACTOR and its vehicle operators. The SOP manual, as such manual may from time to time be amended, is incorporated into this Contract by reference. CONTRACTOR shall be notified and provided with a copy of any changes to the SOP manual. Drivers found not to be in compliance with FSP procedures, as set forth in the SOP manual or this Contract, may be suspended or terminated from the FSP program and the CONTRACTOR may be fined three (3) times the hourly Contract rate in one (1) minute increments until a replacement vehicle is provided (Driver and Truck must return to beat compliant with all FSP requirements), or fined for the entire shift at three (3) times the hourly rate at the discretion of the FSP Field Supervisors. 3.2 Equipment Requirements. CONTRACTOR shall comply with all equipment requirements outlined in the attached Exhibit "A". 3.3 Commencement of Services. The CONTRACTOR shall commence work upon receipt of a written Notice to Proceed from SAFE. 3.4 Term. The term of this Contract shall be from unless earlier terminated as provided herein. SAFE, at its sole discretion, may renew this Contract for a total of two (2) separate one year terms, based on the option -year rates. SAFE shall also have the right to renew this Contract from one month up to a one-year term after the initial term by providing notice as provided below. SAFE must provide written notice to CONTRACTOR no less than ninety (90) days prior to the end of the applicable term, indicating its renewal of the Contract. CONTRACTOR shall complete the Services within the term of this Contract, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. All applicable indemnification provisions of this Contract shall remain in effect following the termination of this Contract. If SAFE, at its sole discretion, renews this Contract for one or both of the additional separate one year terms as provided, the option -year rates shall be as follows: 3 142 SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES Classification Option Year 1 Hourly Rate Option Year 2 Hourly Rate Contract $ X per hour $ X per hour 3.5 SAFE's Representative. SAFE hereby designates the SAFE Executive Director or his or her designee, to act as its Representative for the performance of this Contract (" SAFE's Representative"). SAFE's Representative shall have the authority to act on behalf of SAFE for all purposes under this Contract. SAFE's Representative shall also review and give approval, as needed, to the details of CONTRACTOR's work as it progresses. CONTRACTOR shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the SAFE's Representative or his or her designee. 3.6 CONTRACTOR'S Representative. CONTRACTOR hereby designates [INSERT NAME, TITLE], to act as its representative for the performance of this Contract ("CONTRACTOR's Representative"). CONTRACTOR's Representative shall have full authority to act on behalf of CONTRACTOR for all purposes under this Contract. The CONTRACTOR's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Contract. CONTRACTOR shall work closely and cooperate fully with SAFE's Representative and any other agencies which may have jurisdiction over or an interest in the Services. CONTRACTOR's Representative shall be available to the SAFE staff at all reasonable times. Any substitution in CONTRACTOR's Representative shall be approved in writing by SAFE's Representative. 3.7 Substitution of Key Personnel. CONTRACTOR has represented to SAFE that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Contract. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, CONTRACTOR may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval by SAFE's Representative. In the event that SAFE's Representative and CONTRACTOR cannot agree as to the substitution of the key personnel, SAFE shall be entitled to terminate this Contract for cause, pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.15. The key personnel for performance of this Contract are: [LIST NAMES AND TITLES]. 3.7.1 Availability of FSP Manager. Except in the case of unpreventable circumstances, the FSP Manager must be available at the CONTRACTOR's office for at least 50% of each Work Day to address time sensitive issues related to this Contract or the Services, including, but not limited to, FSP administrative responsibilities; SAFE, CHP, and Caltrans requests; driver matters; and truck maintenance issues. CONTRACTOR shall, within 24 hours, notify SAFE of each circumstance causing the FSP Manager not to be available as required herein. As used in this section, the term "Work Day" shall mean and refer to any day that FSP service is provided, during those hours of operation for Construction FSP as identified on the attached Exhibit "A-1 ". 4 143 3.8 Review of Work and Deliverables. All reports, working papers, and similar work products prepared for submission in the course of providing Services under this Contract may be required to be submitted to SAFE's Representative in draft form, and SAFE's Representative may require revisions of such drafts prior to formal submission and approval. In the event that SAFE's Representative, in his or her sole discretion, determines the formally submitted work product to be inadequate, SAFE's Representative may require CONTRACTOR to revise and resubmit the work at no cost to SAFE. Upon determination by SAFE that CONTRACTOR has satisfactorily completed the Services required under this Contract and within the term set forth in Section 3.4, SAFE shall give CONTRACTOR a written Notice of Final Completion. Upon receipt of such notice, CONTRACTOR shall incur no further costs hereunder, unless otherwise specified in the Notice of Completion. CONTRACTOR may request issuance of a Notice of Final Completion when, in its opinion, it has satisfactorily completed all Services required under the provisions of this Contract. 3.9 Appearance at Hearings. If and when required by SAFE, CONTRACTOR shall render assistance at public hearings or other meetings related to the performance of the Services. 3.10 Standard of Care: Licenses. CONTRACTOR represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform all Services, duties and obligations required by this Contract. CONTRACTOR shall perform the Services and duties in conformance to and consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. CONTRACTOR warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. CONTRACTOR further represents and warrants to SAFE that its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications (including medical certification) and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services, and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Contract. CONTRACTOR shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from SAFE, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the CONTRACTOR's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein, and shall be fully responsible to SAFE for all damages and other liabilities provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Contract arising from the CONTRACTOR's errors and omissions. Any employee of CONTRACTOR or its subcontractors who is determined by SAFE to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Services, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to SAFE, shall be promptly removed from performing the Services by the CONTRACTOR and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services. 3.11 Opportunity to Cure. SAFE may provide CONTRACTOR an opportunity to cure, at CONTRACTOR's expense, all errors and omissions which may be disclosed during performance of the Services. Should CONTRACTOR fail to make such correction in a timely manner, such correction may be made by SAFE, and the cost thereof charged to CONTRACTOR. 5 144 3.12 Inspection of Work. CONTRACTOR shall allow SAFE's Representative to inspect or review CONTRACTOR's performance of Services in progress at any time. SAFE/Caltrans/CHP also reserves the right to audit all paperwork demonstrating that CONTRACTOR participates in an employee alcohol/drug-testing program and the DMV Pull Notice Program. 3.13 Laws and Regulations. CONTRACTOR shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. CONTRACTOR shall be solely liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the CONTRACTOR performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to SAFE, CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold SAFE, their officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Contract, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 3.14 Damage Complaints. Upon receiving a damage complaint from a motorist assisted by the CONTRACTOR, that the CONTRACTOR damaged their vehicle while lending assistance, the CONTRACTOR shall notify CHP immediately regarding the nature of the damage complaint and its disposition. The CONTRACTOR shall reply to the motorist by telephone within twenty-four (24) hours of receiving the damage complaint notification. If necessary, the CONTRACTOR shall send either his or her authorized representative or his or her insurance company representative to inspect the vehicle and complete an incident report within forty-eight (48) hours after receiving the damage complaint. If the investigation shows that damage to the vehicle could have been caused by the CONTRACTOR, the CONTRACTOR shall negotiate in good faith to try and resolve the issue and shall report to the CHP the result of the negotiations. All complaints shall be resolved within a reasonable period of time after being received. 3.14.1 Complaint Review Committee. The FSP Technical Advisory Committee ("FSP TAC") is composed of voting members from CHP, SAFE and Caltrans. Voting members of the FSP TAC are hereby designated as the members of the Damage Complaint Review Committee ("DCRC"). If the DCRC finds that justifiable complaints are not resolved within a reasonable time frame, it can recommend that payment to the CONTRACTOR in the amount of the damage claim may be deducted from the CONTRACTOR's monthly invoice. 3.15 Termination. 3.15.1 Notice; Reason. SAFE may, by written notice to CONTRACTOR, terminate this Contract, in whole or in part, including, without limitation, the geographical territory covered by this Contract, at any time by giving written notice to CONTRACTOR of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof ("Notice of Termination"). Such 6 145 termination may be for SAFE's convenience or because of CONTRACTOR's failure to perform its duties and obligations under this Contract, including, but not limited to, the failure of CONTRACTOR to timely perform Services pursuant to the Scope of Services described in Section 3, entitled "Terms," as well as Section 7 of the RFP. CONTRACTOR may not terminate this Contract except for cause. 3.15.2 Discontinuance of Services. Upon receipt of the written Notice of Termination, CONTRACTOR shall discontinue all affected Services as directed in the Notice of Termination, and deliver to SAFE all Documents and Data, as defined in this Contract, as may have been prepared or accumulated by CONTRACTOR in performance of the Services, whether completed or in progress. 3.15.3 Effect of Termination For Convenience. If the termination is to be for the convenience of SAFE, SAFE shall compensate CONTRACTOR for Services fully and adequately provided through the effective date of termination as provided in the Notice of Termination. Such payment shall include a pro -rated amount of profit, if applicable, up through such effective date, but no amount shall be paid for anticipated profit on unperformed Services past such effective date. CONTRACTOR shall provide documentation deemed adequate by SAFE's Representative to show the Services actually completed by CONTRACTOR prior to the effective date of termination. This Contract shall terminate on the effective date of the Notice of Termination. 3.15.4 Effect of Termination for Cause. If the termination is for cause, CONTRACTOR shall be compensated for those Services which have been fully and adequately completed and accepted by SAFE as of the effective date of termination as provided in the Notice of Termination. In such case, SAFE may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise. Further, CONTRACTOR shall be liable to SAFE for any reasonable additional costs or damages incurred to revise work for which SAFE has compensated CONTRACTOR under this Contract, but which SAFE has determined in its sole discretion needs to be revised, in part or whole. Termination of this Contract for cause may be considered by SAFE in determining whether to enter into future contracts with CONTRACTOR. 3.15.5 Cumulative Remedies. The rights and remedies of the Parties provided in this Section are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this Contract. 3.15.6 Procurement of Similar Services. In the event this Contract is terminated, in whole or in part, as provided by this Section, SAFE may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it deems appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.15.7 Waivers. CONTRACTOR, in executing this Contract, shall be deemed to have waived any and all claims for damages which may otherwise arise from SAFE's termination of this Contract, for convenience or cause, as provided in this Section. 7 146 3.15.8 Authorization to Terminate. The Executive Director of SAFE shall have the full authority and discretion to exercise SAFE's rights under this Section 3.15, entitled "Termination". 3.16 Trend Meetings. CONTRACTOR shall attend, or send a designated management -level representative, to all trend meetings (i.e. required FSP TAC meeting which meets every other month). These trend meetings will encompass focused and informal discussions concerning, but not limited to: scope, Services, schedule, current progress of Services, relevant cost issues, and future objectives. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for having a representative attend all meetings (i.e. FSP TAC meetings) that has the ability to make management -level decisions on the behalf of the CONTRACTOR. If the CONTRACTOR cannot have a management -level representative at a meeting, CONTRACTOR shall notify SAFE and CHP prior to the meeting. Management -level attendance at these meetings shall be considered part of the CONTRACTOR's contractual responsibility. Meetings are scheduled, and CONTRACTOR will be notified of such schedule, no later than three (3) working days prior to the meeting. 3.17 Fees and Payment. 3.17.1 Amount to be Paid. Subject to the provisions set forth below for Services satisfactorily performed hereunder, SAFE shall pay the CONTRACTOR on a Time and Materials basis a ceiling price NOT TO EXCEED DOLLARS ($ )• 3.17.2 Maximum Payment is the Ceiling Price. SAFE shall not be obligated to pay costs which exceed the ceiling price set forth above, except as provided in Sections 3.15 and 3.17.10. CONTRACTOR agrees to use its best efforts to perform the services and all obligations under this Contract within such ceiling price. 3.17.3 Hourly Rate; Break and Meal Periods. For its performance of the Services, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid for labor expended directly in the performance of the Services at the rates specified below. Payments shall be made monthly in arrears based on Services provided and allowable incurred expenses. The CONTRACTOR shall not be entitled to reimbursements for any expenses unless approved in advance in writing. SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES Classification Hourly Rate Contract — tow truck operators Hourly rates may be adjusted as set forth in Chapter 9, Violations/Penalties, of the FSP Standard Operating Procedures (SOP). A) CONTRACTOR is responsible for compliance with all California labor laws related to break periods and meal periods including, but not limited 8 147 to, compliance with Labor Code section 512. CONTRACTOR shall be solely responsible for any additional pay to which its drivers may be entitled for CONTRACTOR's failure to comply with the California labor law requirements. B) During shifts that require drivers to be provided a 30- minute meal period break pursuant to Labor Code section 512, CONTRACTOR shall either make arrangements for another certified driver to provide Services during those breaks or not be compensated for each 30-minute meal period break during which Services are not provided. In no case shall CONTRACTOR be entitled to bill RCTC for time during which a driver is taking a meal period break. 3.17.4 Payment Coverage. The compensation herein above specified will cover and include all applicable labor surcharges such as taxes, insurance and fringe benefits, as well as indirect costs, overhead, general and administrative expense, and profit. 3.17.5 Cost Principles. A) CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with 2 CFR, Part 225, Cost Principles for State and Local Government, and 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. B) CONTRACTOR agrees that 1) Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., shall be used to determine the allowability of individual cost items, and 2) CONTRACTOR shall comply with Federal administrative procedures in accordance with 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. C) Any costs for which CONTRACTOR has received payment or credit that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 2 CFR, Part 225, 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 or 49 CFR, Part 18, are subject to repayment by CONTRACTOR to SAFE. Should CONTRACTOR fail to reimburse moneys due SAFE within 30 days of demand, or within such other period as may be agreed in writing between the Parties hereto, SAFE is authorized to intercept and withhold future payments due CONTRACTOR from SAFE or any third -party source, including, but not limited to, the State Treasurer, the State Controller, and the California Transportation Commission. 3.17.6 Fines. Fines for starting late; leaving early; taking more breaks than authorized; or being ordered out of service by a CHP, SAFE Representative or Caltrans supervisor for Contract infractions shall be deducted from the CONTRACTOR's monthly invoice at five (5) times the hourly rate, plus the loss of revenue for the down time. Fines may be further described in the attached Exhibit "A" or Exhibit "B". 3.17.7 Accounting System. CONTRACTOR and its subcontractors shall establish and maintain an accounting system and records that properly accumulate and segregate expenditures by line item for the Services. The accounting system of 9 148 CONTRACTOR and its subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion, and provide support for reimbursement payment vouchers or invoices. 3.17.8 Invoices. Invoices for CONTRACTOR's Services shall be submitted monthly on forms approved by SAFE. Invoices will be routinely verified by CHP. To ensure prompt payment, most billing disputes may be resolved within ten (10) working days of written notice of dispute. However, at SAFE's discretion, reconciliation of disputed fines that sum to less than 2% of the months' Invoice may be corrected on the next month's Invoice to ensure prompt payment of the major portion of the invoice. Each Invoice shall include a cover sheet bearing a certification as to the accuracy of the statement signed by the CONTRACTOR's authorized officer. Invoices shall be mailed to SAFE's Contract Administrator at the following address: Riverside County Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies FSP Program P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attn: Brian Cunanan 3.17.8.1 Monthly Progress Reports. As part of its Invoice, CONTRACTOR shall submit a Monthly Progress Report, in a form determined by SAFE, which will cover the Invoice period and include spreadsheets showing hours expended for each day of the month per vehicle per beat, and the total for the term of the Contract to date. Submission of such Monthly Progress Report by CONTRACTOR shall be a condition precedent to receipt of payment from SAFE for each monthly Invoice submitted. 3.17.8.2 Payment Schedule. Invoice periods shall be based upon a calendar month, beginning with the first day of the month. SAFE shall reimburse CONTRACTOR for Services adequately provided under this Contract within thirty (30) days of receiving the current period invoice with no errors. If the Invoice is completed incorrectly by the CONTRACTOR, it will delay payment. If SAFE fails to pay any amount owed to CONTRACTOR under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt of the invoice, CONTRACTOR may give SAFE a notice of failure to pay which shall set forth the invoice(s) and amount(s) which CONTRACTOR believes are thirty (30) days overdue. SAFE shall pay any undisputed invoice(s) and amount(s) within thirty (30) days of receipt of a notice of failure to pay. 3.17.9 Right to Audit. For the purpose of determining compliance with this Contract and other matters connected with the performance of CONTRACTOR's contracts with third parties, CONTRACTOR and its subcontractors shall each maintain and make available for inspection all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of such contracts, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering those various contracts. All of the above referenced parties shall make such materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times for three years from the date of final payment of Funds to CONTRACTOR. SAFE, the State of California acting 10 149 through the Department of Transportation or its duly authorized representative, the California State Auditor, or the United States Department of Transportation shall each have access to any books, records, and documents that are pertinent for audits, examinations, excerpts, and transactions, and CONTRACTOR shall furnish copies thereof if requested. 3.17.10 Taxes. CONTRACTOR shall pay any sales, use, or other taxes, if any, attributable to the provision of the Services. 3.17.11 Travel and Subsistence. Payments to CONTRACTOR for travel and subsistence expenses claimed for reimbursement or applied as local match credit shall not exceed rates authorized to be paid exempt non -represented State employees under current State Department of Personnel Administration (DPA) rules. If the rates invoiced are in excess of those authorized DPA rates, then CONTRACTOR is responsible for the cost difference and any overpayments shall be reimbursed to SAFE on demand. 3.17.12 Employment Adverse to the SAFE. CONTRACTOR shall notify SAFE, and shall obtain SAFE's written consent, prior to accepting work to assist with or participate in a third -party lawsuit or other legal or administrative proceeding against SAFE during the term of this Contract. 3.17.13 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Contract, SAFE may request CONTRACTOR to perform Extra Work. "Extra Work" shall mean any work which is determined by SAFE to be necessary for proper completion of the Services, but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the time of the execution of this Contract and was not included in the Scope of Services. Extra Work, if any, shall be reimbursed at the same hourly rate as identified in Section 3.17.3. CONTRACTOR shall not perform, nor be compensated for Extra Work without obtaining authorization in the form of a written Extra Work Order issued by SAFE's Representative. For instance, Construction FSP services as it relates to construction activity can be considered Extra Work. In the event an Extra Work Order is not issued and signed by SAFE's Representative, CONTRACTOR shall not provide such Extra Work. However, no compensation or reimbursement for Extra Work shall be paid if it is not authorized by SAFE and if the cumulative total of such Extra Work under the Contract exceeds $25,000. All Extra Work in a cumulative total in excess of $25,000 must be approved in advance by amendment to this Contract. 3.17.13.1 Extra Work Cancellation Policy. If a tow operator is scheduled for Extra Work and they are notified of a cancellation with LESS than a 24-hour notice — then the tow operator will be reimbursed for three (3) hours of the agreed upon contract hourly rate. Note: The minimum of the three (3) hours should cover eight hours of the drivers' hourly wage. Starting with "Less than a 24-hour cancellation notice" up to the time the tow operator is on the assigned Extra Work Beat, the "three contract hour cancellation rate" remains the same. Once the tow operator is on the Extra Work Beat, the cancellation policy changes. If a tow operator begins the Extra Work (the truck is on the Beat) and is then notified that Extra Work has been cancelled, the FSP operator will be paid for the entire shift period up to a maximum of eight (8) hours. A shift period for this policy is defined as: the time period of 11 150 the actual Extra Work shift assigned or for a maximum of eight (8) contract hours, whichever is less. The supervising FSP CHP Officer for the Extra Work shift will make the final determination as to whether or not the tow operator will continue to work the Extra Work shift. Regardless, the tow operator will be reimbursed for the original shift period or a maximum or eight (8) hours, whichever is less. 3.17.14 Most Favored Customer. CONTRACTOR agrees that, throughout the term of this Contract, it shall not enter into any FSP services agreement with any government agency with whom it has either existing contractual relationship or has no contractual relationship that predates this Contract, pursuant to which CONTRACTOR agrees to charge FSP services fees less than those as indicated in this Contract for substantially the same level of FSP services contemplated by this Contract. Should SAFE establish that such lower fees have been agreed to by CONTRACTOR with another government agency, CONTRACTOR agrees to renegotiate the fees or to refund SAFE an amount equal to the difference between the fees indicated in this Contract and the fees charged to other government agency customer. 3.18 Delay in Performance. 3.18.1 Excusable Delays. Neither Party shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligations to the extent that the performance of any such obligation is prevented or delayed by an Excusable Delay. Should CONTRACTOR be delayed or prevented from the timely performance of any act or Services required by the terms of the Contract by an Excusable Delay, Contractor's schedule for completion of tasks affected by such delay may be extended as set forth in Section 3.18.2. But in every case, CONTRACTOR's failure to perform must be reasonably beyond the control, and without the fault or negligence of the CONTRACTOR. Excusable Delays are acts of God or of the public enemy, acts or omissions of SAFE or other governmental agencies in either their sovereign or contractual capacities, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes or unusually severe weather. 3.18.2 Written Notice. If CONTRACTOR believes it is entitled to an extension of time due to conditions set forth in subsection 3.18.1, CONTRACTOR shall provide written notice to the SAFE within seven (7) working days from the time CONTRACTOR knows, or reasonably should have known, that performance of the Services will be delayed due to such conditions. Failure of CONTRACTOR to provide such timely notice shall constitute a waiver by CONTRACTOR of any right to an excusable delay in time of performance. 3.18.3 Mutual Contract. Performance of any Services under this Contract may be delayed upon mutual agreement of the Parties. Upon such agreement, CONTRACTOR's Schedule of Services (as defined in their Proposal) shall be extended as necessary by SAFE. CONTRACTOR shall take all reasonable steps to minimize delay in completion, and additional costs, resulting from any such extension. 12 151 3.19 Status of CONTRACTOR/Subcontractors. 3.19.1 Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by CONTRACTOR or under its supervision. CONTRACTOR will determine the means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Contract. SAFE retains CONTRACTOR on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee, agent or representative of the SAFE. CONTRACTOR retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Contract. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Contract on behalf of CONTRACTOR shall at all times be under CONTRACTOR's exclusive direction and control. CONTRACTOR shall pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services and as required by law. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such personnel, including but not limited to, social security taxes, income tax withholdings, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.19.2 Assignment or Transfer. CONTRACTOR shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Contract or any interest herein, without the prior written consent of SAFE. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, SAFE may transfer or assign any and all of its rights and obligations under this Contract, including, without limitation the rights to terminate this Contract, as assigned, pursuant to Section 3.15 hereof. 3.19.3 Subcontracting. CONTRACTOR shall not subcontract any portion of the work or Services required by this Contract, except as expressly stated herein, including the Scope of Services, without prior written approval of the SAFE. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Contract. SAFE shall have no liability to any subconsultant(s) for payment for services under this Contract or other work performed for CONTRACTOR, and any subcontract entered into by CONTRACTOR pursuant to the conduct of services under this Contract shall duly note that the responsibility for payment for the technical services or any other work performed shall be the sole responsibility of CONTRACTOR. 3.20 CONTRACTOR will maintain an inventory of all non -expendable equipment, defined as having a useful life of at least two years and an acquisition cost of $500 or more, paid for with funds provided pursuant to this Contract. 3.21 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality. 3.21.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. All plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings, spreadsheets, or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, 13 152 prepared by or on behalf of CONTRACTOR under this Contract ("Documents and Data"), shall be made available to SAFE at all times during this Contract and shall become the property of SAFE upon the completion of the term of this Contract, except that CONTRACTOR shall have the right to retain copies of all such Documents and Data for its records. Should CONTRACTOR, either during or following termination of this Contract, desire to use any Documents and Data, it shall first obtain the written approval of SAFE. This Contract creates a no -cost, nonexclusive, and perpetual license for SAFE to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in the Documents and Data which are prepared or caused to be prepared by CONTRACTOR under this Contract ("Intellectual Property"). CONTRACTOR shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that SAFE is granted a no -cost, nonexclusive, and perpetual license for any Intellectual Property the subcontractor prepares under this Contract. CONTRACTOR represents and warrants that CONTRACTOR has the legal right to license any and all Intellectual Property prepared or caused to be prepared by CONTRACTOR under this Contract. SAFE shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Intellectual Property at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Contract shall be at SAFE's sole risk. 3.21.2 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to CONTRACTOR in connection with the performance of this Contract shall be held confidential by CONTRACTOR to the extent permitted by law, including, without limitation, the California Public Records Act, Government Code section 6250 et seq. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of SAFE, be used by CONTRACTOR for any purposes other than the performance of the Services as provided herein. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services, except as provided herein. Nothing furnished to CONTRACTOR which is otherwise known to CONTRACTOR or is generally known, or becomes known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. CONTRACTOR shall not use SAFE's name or insignia, photographs, or any publicity pertaining to the Services in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production, or other similar medium without the prior written consent of SAFE. 3.22 Indemnification. CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and hold SAFE, COMMISSION, CHP, Caltrans and their directors, officials, officers, agents, contractors, consultants, employees, and volunteers free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, or incident to, any acts, omissions, or willful misconduct of the CONTRACTOR, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants, and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services or this Contract, including without limitation, the payment of all consequential damages and other related costs and expenses. CONTRACTOR shall defend, at CONTRACTOR's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions, or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against SAFE, COMMISSION, CHP, Caltrans or their directors, officials, officers, agents, contractors, consultants, employees, and volunteers. CONTRACTOR shall pay and satisfy any judgment, 14 153 award, or decree that may be rendered against SAFE, COMMISSION, CHP, Caltrans or their directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees, and volunteers, in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. CONTRACTOR shall reimburse SAFE, COMMISSION, CHP, Caltrans and their directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees, and volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. CONTRACTOR's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the CONTRACTOR, SAFE, COMMISSION, CHP, Caltrans or their directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees, and volunteers. 3.23 Insurance. 3.23.1 Time for Compliance. CONTRACTOR shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to SAFE that it has secured all insurance required under this section, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to SAFE. In addition, CONTRACTOR shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. 3.23.2 Minimum Requirements. CONTRACTOR shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Agreement by the CONTRACTOR, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. CONTRACTOR shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage: (A) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001 or exact equivalent); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage (form CA 0001, code 1 (any auto) or exact equivalent); and (3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. no less than: (B) Minimum Limits of Insurance. CONTRACTOR shall maintain limits (i) General Liability: Per occurrence: $2,000,000 Project Specific Aggregate: $4,000,000 Products/Completed Operations: $1,000,000 Personal Injury Limit: $1,000,000 (ii) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and 15 154 (iii) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. Employer's Practices Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. 3.23.3 On -Hook Insurance. CONTRACTOR shall maintain a policy of On -Hook Towing Insurance to include the care, custody or control exposure present while vehicles are being serviced roadside, on -hook, or in a storage yard for not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). 3.23.4 Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or CONTRACTOR shall provide endorsements on forms approved by SAFE to add the following provisions to the insurance policies: (A) General Liability. (i) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for (1) bodily Injury and property damage; (2) personal Injury/advertising Injury; (3) premises/operations liability; (4) products/completed operations liability; (5) aggregate limits that apply per Project; (6) explosion, collapse and underground (UCX) exclusion deleted; (7) contractual liability with respect to this Agreement; (8) broad form property damage; and (9) independent consultants coverage. (ii) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to this Agreement. (iii) The policy shall give SAFE, COMMISSION, CHP, Caltrans and their directors, officials, officers, employees, and agents insured status using ISO endorsement forms 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (iv) The additional insured coverage under the policy shall be "primary and non-contributory" and will not seek contribution from SAFE, COMMISSION, CHP, or Caltrans insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 01 04 13, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (B) Automobile Liability. The automobile liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) SAFE, COMMISSION, CHP, Caltrans and their directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the CONTRACTOR or for which the CONTRACTOR is responsible; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects SAFE, COMMISSION, CHP, Caltrans and their directors, officials, officers, employees and agents, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the CONTRACTOR's scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by SAFE, COMMISSION, CHP, 16 155 Caltrans or their directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be excess of the CONTRACTOR's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. (C) Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. (i) CONTRACTOR certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. (ii) The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against SAFE, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by the CONTRACTOR. (D) All Coverages. (i) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits set forth hereunder. (ii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits set forth herein shall be available to SAFE, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds under said policies. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured; whichever is greater. (iii) The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of SAFE, COMMISSION, CHP, and Caltrans (if agreed to in a written contract or agreement) before SAFE, COMMISSION, CHP or Caltrans own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. The umbrella/excess policy shall be provided on a "following form" basis with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying policy(ies). (iv) CONTRACTOR shall provide SAFE at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement, except that the CONTRACTOR shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the CONTRACTOR shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to SAFE at least 17 156 ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. (v) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. CONTRACTOR shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by another claims -made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. (vi) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONTRACTOR, and any approval of said insurance by SAFE, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification. (vii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, SAFE has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by SAFE will be promptly reimbursed by CONTRACTOR or SAFE will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from CONTRACTOR payments. In the alternative, SAFE may cancel this Agreement. SAFE may require the CONTRACTOR to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (viii) Neither SAFE, COMMISSION, CHP, Caltrans nor any of their directors, officials, officers, employees or agents shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that: 3.23.5 Deductibles and Self -Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by SAFE. If SAFE does not approve the deductibles or self -insured retentions as presented, CONTRACTOR shall guarantee that, at the option of SAFE, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects SAFE, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents; or, (2) the CONTRACTOR shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses. 3.23.6 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to SAFE. 18 157 3.23.7 Verification of Coverage. CONTRACTOR shall furnish SAFE with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to SAFE. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by SAFE before work commences. SAFE reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 3.23.8 Subcontractor Insurance Requirements. CONTRACTOR shall not allow any subcontractors to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to SAFE that they have secured all insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subcontractors shall be endorsed to name SAFE, COMMISSION, CHP and Caltrans as additional insureds using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by CONTRACTOR, SAFE may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subcontractors. 3.23.9 Review of Coverage. SAFE retains the right at any time to review the coverage, form and amount of insurance required herein and may require CONTRACTOR to obtain additional insurance reasonably sufficient in coverage, form, amount to provide adequate protection against the kind and extent of risk which exists at the time of change in insurance required. 3.23.10 Safety. CONTRACTOR shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the CONTRACTOR shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment, and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.24 Prohibited Interests. 3.24.1 Solicitation. CONTRACTOR maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONTRACTOR, to solicit or secure this Contract. Further, CONTRACTOR warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONTRACTOR, any fee, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, SAFE shall have the right to rescind this Contract without liability. 19 158 3.24.2 Conflict of Interest. For the term of this Contract, no member, officer or employee of SAFE, during the term of his or her service with SAFE, shall have any direct interest in this Contract, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.24.3 Conflict of Employment. Employment by the CONTRACTOR of personnel currently on the payroll of SAFE shall not be permitted in the performance of this Contract, even though such employment may occur outside of the employee's regular working hours or on weekends, holidays, or vacation time. Further, the employment by the CONTRACTOR of personnel who have been on SAFE payroll within one year prior to the date of execution of this Contract, where this employment is caused by, and or dependent upon, the CONTRACTOR securing this or related Contracts with SAFE, is prohibited. 3.25 Equal Opportunity Employment. CONTRACTOR represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee, or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, disability (including HIV and AIDS), mental disability, medical condition (cancer), marital status, denial of family and medical care leave, or denial of pregnancy disability leave. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff, or termination. Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code Section 12900 et seq.) and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder (Cal. Admin. Code, Tit. 2, Section 7285.0 et seq.): The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code, Sec 12900, set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Administrative Code, Sec 12900, set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Administrative Code are incorporated into this Contract by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. CONTRACTOR shall include the provisions of this Section in all of CONTRACTOR's subcontracts with respect to work under this Agreement, unless exempted by the Regulations. CONTRACTOR shall also comply with all relevant provisions of SAFE's Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan, or other related SAFE programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. 3.26 Right to Employ Other CONTRACTORs. SAFE reserves the right to employ other CONTRACTORs in connection with the Services. 3.27 Governing Law. The validity of this Contract and of any of its terms or provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the parties hereunder, shall be governed by and construed with the laws of the State of California. 3.28 Venue. The Parties acknowledge and agree that this Contract was entered into and intended to be performed in Riverside County, California. The Parties agree that the venue for any action or claim brought by any Party will be the Central District of Riverside County. Each Party hereby waives any law or rule of court which would allow them to request or demand a change of venue. If any action or claim concerning this Contract is 20 159 brought by any third party, the Parties agree to use their best efforts to obtain a change of venue to the Central District of Riverside County. 3.29 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Contract. 3.30 Headings. Article and section headings, paragraph captions, or marginal headings contained in this Contract are for convenience only and shall have no effect in the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. 3.31 Notices. All notices hereunder and communications regarding interpretation of the terms of this Contract or changes thereto shall be given to the respective Parties at the following addresses, or at such other addresses as the respective Parties may provide in writing for this purpose: CONTRACTOR: SAFE: Name Riverside County Service Authority for Title Freeway Emergencies Address FSP Program City, State Zip P.O. Box 12008 Attn: Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attn: Brian Cunanan Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid, and addressed to the Party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.33 Amendment or Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties. 3.34 Entire Contract. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations, contracts or understandings. 3.35 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.36 No Waiver. Failure of CONTRACTOR to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any 21 160 rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times. 3.37 Eight -Hour Law. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Labor Code, eight hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work, and the time of service of any worker employed on the work shall be limited and restricted to eight hours during any one calendar day, and forty hours in any one calendar week, except when payment for overtime is made at not less than one and one-half the basic rate for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day ("Eight -Hour Law"), unless CONTRACTOR or the Services are not subject to the Eight - Hour Law. CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to SAFE as a penalty, $50.00 for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by him, or by any sub -consultant under him, for each calendar day during which such workman is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any calendar day and forty hours in any one calendar week without such compensation for overtime violation of the provisions of the California Labor Code, unless CONTRACTOR or the Services are not subject to the Eight -Hour Law. 3.38 Subpoenas or Court Orders. Should CONTRACTOR receive a subpoena or court order related to this Agreement, the Services or the Project, CONTRACTOR shall immediately provide written notice of the subpoena or court order to the SAFE. CONTRACTOR shall not respond to any such subpoena or court order until notice to the SAFE is provided as required herein, and shall cooperate with the SAFE in responding to the subpoena or court order. 3.39 Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the indemnification and confidentiality obligations, and the obligations related to receipt of subpoenas or court orders, shall survive any such expiration or termination. 3.40 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in one or more counterparts, any one of which shall be effective as an original document. 3.41 Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 3.42 Conflicting Provisions. In the event that provisions of any attached exhibits conflict in any way with the provisions set forth in this Agreement, the language, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall control the actions and obligations of the Parties and the interpretation of the Parties' understanding concerning the performance of the Services. In the event the standards set forth in this Agreement conflict with the standards set forth in any exhibit hereto, the higher standard shall govern. 3.43 Attorneys' Fees and Costs. If any legal action is instituted to enforce or declare any Party's rights hereunder, each Party, including the prevailing Party, must bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This paragraph shall not apply to those costs and attorneys' fees directly arising from any third party legal action against a Party hereto and payable under Section 3.21, Indemnification. 22 161 3.44 Consent. Whenever consent or approval of any Party is required under this Contract, that Party shall not unreasonably withhold nor delay such consent or approval. 3.45 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. [Signatures on following page] 23 162 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date first herein written above. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ACTING AS THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES [LEGAL STATUS OF CONTRACTOR) By: By: John F. Tavaglione, Chairman Name Title APPROVED AS TO FORM: Attest: By: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP, Counsel to the Riverside County Its: Secretary Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies 24 163 EXHIBIT "A" Scope of Services 25 164 EXHIBIT "B" Compensation and Payment [INSERT FINAL PRICE PROPOSALS FROM CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL] 26 165 AGENDA ITEM 7L RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Michelle McCamish, Management Analyst Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2017/18 Measure A Commuter Assistance Buspool Subsidy Funding Continuation Requests WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Authorize payment of $1,645/month maximum subsidy per buspool for the period July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, to the existing Riverside and Riverside II buspools; and 2) Require subsidy recipients to meet monthly buspool reporting requirements as supporting documentation to receive payments. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: As part of the Measure A Commuter Assistance Program, the Commission provides funding support to buspools used by Riverside County residents for their commutes along the State Route 91 corridor. The Commission adopted the Measure A buspool subsidy in October 1990 and established a monthly subsidy rate of $1,175 or $25/seat/month in support of commuter buspool operations. In July 2004, the Commission set the subsidy rate at $35/seat/month ($1,645/month) to help offset increases to operational costs during the previous 14 years. To provide additional guidance, the Commission also established a minimum buspool ridership policy in June 1995. The policy requires staff to report to the Commission when a buspool's ridership falls to 25 or below and to seek direction regarding the continuation of the buspool's subsidy. DISCUSSION: Like all commuter assistance incentives provided by the Commission to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation, the $35/seat/month subsidy is administered as a user end subsidy. The Commission's subsidy is an important factor that makes buspools an attractive alternative for these commuters with roundtrip commutes in excess of 100 miles. Also, the Commission's subsidy remains cost-effective compared to the typical public transit subsidy rate Agenda Item 7L 166 of 80 percent. While the monthly cost of each buspool varies according to the number of route miles and the resulting negotiated service price, the Commission's monthly subsidy reflects a subsidy rate of 11 percent. Average Monthly Buspool Fare Per Rider $318 RCTC Subsidy Per Seat $35 Subsidy Rate 11% Unlike some of the other Commission -approved ridesharing incentives that have a limited term, the buspool subsidy is ongoing. To renew its annual subsidy, an existing buspool is required to: • Request in writing, continuation of funding from the Commission for the new fiscal year; • Consistently meet minimum ridership requirements; and • Submit monthly ridership reports throughout the year. The two existing buspools have completed all the requirements for funding as set forth by the Commission, including the submittal of monthly ridership reports and annual funding continuation requests. They have consistently met the minimum ridership level of 25 riders per month and have collectively averaged 30 riders/month/buspool. The traffic and environmental benefits realized in Fiscal Year 2016/17 by offering this subsidy are illustrated below: Buspools Average Riders/Month Roundtrip Distance Annual Miles Saved Annual One -Way Trips Reduced Riverside 31 —144 mi 1,143,648 15,884 Riverside II 29 —200 mi 1,496,000 14,960 Estimated Pounds of Emissions Reduced 24,761 Miles Saved 2,639,648 Trips Reduced 30,844 In reducing the number of vehicles on SR-91 during peak periods, the buspool program saved more than 2.6 million miles and 24,761 pounds of vehicle emissions in FY 2016/17. The buspool subsidy is funded by Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds and a budget of $80,000 is proposed for FY 2017/18. Based on the established monthly $1,645/month per buspool subsidy policy, the funds will support the continuation of the two existing buspools plus up to two new buspools through FY 2017/18. Agenda Item 7L 167 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2017/18 Amount: $80,000 Source of Funds: CMAQ Budget Adjustment: No GL/Project Accounting No.: 002109 81030 263 41 81002 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \14e4-iii.44 Date: 06/19/2017 Attachments: 1) Riverside Renewal Request 2) Riverside II Renewal Request Agenda Item 7L 168 CATALINA FUENTES Send correspondences to: Raytheon Company 2000 E. El Segundo Blvd. PO Box 902 Bldg. R1 Rm. 9Z24 MS. B500 El Segundo, CA 90245-4501 May 15, 2017 Attn.: Michelle McCamish, Management Analyst Commuter & Motorist Assistance Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Dear Ms. McCamish, In compliance with the requirements of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), I am requesting an extension of funding for the period of July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018 for the "Riverside" to El Segundo Commuter Buspool. I am the buspool coordinator and I coordinate this buspool independently from any employer. The monthly cost to operate this bus pool from Cee People Tours, LLC is $285. RCTC provides a $35 monthly subsidy per seat and the remaining $250 is paid for by the riders and their employers. The following is the Riverside to El Segundo Bus pool schedule: AM Departure Galleria at Tyler, Riverside 4:10 a.m. AM Departure AM/PM Mini Market Lot (Corner of Lincoln & Pomona Rd.) 4:22 a.m. AM Arrival Raytheon, El Segundo 5:12 a.m. PM Departure PM Arrival PM Arrival Raytheon, El Segundo Corona Park & Ride Lot Galleria at Tyler, Riverside 3:00 p.m. 4:30 p.m. 4:45 p.m. Information on this buspool is available with rideshare programs at Raytheon Aerospace Corporation, Boeing and the Los Angeles Air Force base. Employees receive this information through direct mailings, newsletter articles, and electronic messaging from these employers. These employer rideshare programs also share this information with other local employee transportation coordinators. Thank you for your continued support of this successful buspool program. Sincerely, Bata ewa S. caegite4 Catalina Fuentes Riverside Bus pool Coordinator 169 TRACY HUTCHINSON Send correspondences to: Raytheon Company 2000 E. El Segundo Blvd. El Segundo, CA 90245 May 16, 2017 Attn.: Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Dear Mr. Cunanan, In compliance with the requirements of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), I am requesting an extension of funding for the period of July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018 for the "Riverside 2" to El Segundo Commuter Buspool. I am the buspool coordinator and I coordinate this buspool independently from any employer. The monthly cost to operate this buspool from Essential Transportation is $350. RCTC provides a $35 monthly subsidy per seat and the remaining $315 is paid for by the riders and their employers. The following is the Riverside to El Segundo Buspool schedule: AM Departure AM Departure AM Arrival PM Departure PM Arrival PM Arrival Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station North Main Corona Metrolink Station Raytheon, El Segundo Raytheon, El Segundo North Main Corona Metrolink Station Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station 4:25 a.m. 4:50 a.m. 5:50 a.m. 3:25 p.m. 5:20 p.m. 5:45 p.m. Information on this buspool is available with rideshare programs at Raytheon, Boeing, Aerospace Corporation, and the Los Angeles Air Force base. Employees receive this information through direct mailings, newsletter articles, and electronic messaging from these employers. These employer rideshare programs also share this information with other local employee transportation coordinators. Thank you for your continued support of this successful buspool program. Sincerely, Tracy Hutchinson Riverside 2 Buspool Coordinator 170 AGENDA ITEM 7M RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Brenda Ramirez, Management Analyst Sheldon Peterson, Rail Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding with Riverside Police Department STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 17-33-117-00 with the city of Riverside Police Department (RPD) to provide aerial surveillance and support to the Commission -owned rail stations and right of way in the amount not to exceed $244,637; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On May 1, 2017, the Commission was awarded California Proposition 1B California Transit Security Grant Program -California Transit Assistance Funds (CTSGP-CTAF) to procure tools and security equipment for the rail stations. These grant funds assisted the Commission in upgrading on -site video surveillance systems, software, and hardware, which have enhanced its continued efforts to make its rail stations secure for patrons. The Commission was presented with an opportunity to integrate an aerial surveillance aspect of its stations and right of way by partnering with the RPD in a high -priority project. The project will involve installation of a new state of the art helicopter -based aerial thermal imaging sensor camera. The total project cost of purchasing the camera is approximately $514,600 and RPD will be providing a majority share of $270,000. The Commission will be an active partner in supporting this project and will fund up to $244,637 using Proposition 1B security funds. This project will provide the Commission with daily aerial surveillance patrols of all rail stations and related rail lines in the cities of Corona and Riverside and bi-weekly patrols of rail stations in the Perris area; which will add to the overall security monitoring at no additional costs to the Commission. Additionally, in the event of a major incident (i.e. derailment, significant accident, natural disaster, and/or terrorism), RPD will assist in providing a solid aerial command and control platform to ground personnel. This includes providing high definition video downlink capabilities to both staff and emergency personnel, which will complement the Commission's on -site security guard force. Agenda Item 7M 171 The project schedule is slated to begin its aerial surveillance in December 2017. The term of the agreement will be for three years from the executed date. Staff will work cooperatively with RPD staff to also obtain project milestone progress until the aerial surveillance equipment is installed and put into service. Further, RPD will track all aerial security checks and have the logged history available to the Commission on a quarterly basis to ensure the aerial surveillance is being completed per the agreement. This is a great opportunity for enhanced safety and security for the region and the transportation network. No budget adjustment is required as the Proposition 1B funds have been received by the Commission and are in the budget. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2017/18 Amount: $244,637 Source of Funds: Proposition 1B Security Funds Budget Adjustment: No GL/Project Accounting No.: P004012 9060100000 0000 265 33 90101 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \liff424,6„citurz Date: 06/30/2017 Attachment: Agreement No. 17-33-117-00 Agenda Item 7M 172 Agreement No. 17-33-117-00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROPOSITION 1 B CALIFORNIA TRANSIT SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM-CALIFORNIA TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR HELICOPTER BASED AERIAL THERMAL IMAGING SENSOR CAMERA 1. Parties and Date. This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 2017, by and between the Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereinafter referred to as "RCTC," and the City of Riverside, on behalf of the City of Riverside Police Department, hereinafter referred to as "Police Department". 2. Recitals. 2.1 On May 1, 2017, RCTC was awarded California Proposition 1 B California Transit Security Grant Program -California Transit Assistance Funds (CTSGP-CTAF) by the State of California ("State") to procure tools and security equipment for the commuter rail stations operated and maintained by RCTC in Riverside County. 2.2 RCTC executed that certain grant agreement with the State for the CTSGP-CTAF grant funds ("Grant Agreement"). 2.3 RCTC has the opportunity to integrate an aerial surveillance aspect of its commuter rail stations and right of way by partnering with Police Department in a high priority project. The project will involve installation by Police Department of a new state of the art helicopter based aerial thermal imaging sensor camera, and the use by Police Department of the equipment for the provision of surveillance and support to RCTC as further described in this Agreement and in Exhibit "A" (the "Project"). 2.4 The proposal submitted by Police Department describes a priority project which RCTC has determined merits funding and satisfies the purposes of the Grant Agreement, if accomplished as specified herein, and Police Department is eligible to receive CTSGP-CTAF grant funds. 2.5 On July 12, 2017, RCTC's Board of Directors approved the programming by RCTC of up to Two Hundred Forty Four Thousand, Six Hundred Thirty Seven Dollars ($244,637) in CTSGP-CTAF grant funds for the Project. 2.6 RCTC shall disburse CTSGP-CTAF grant funds received from the State to Police Department for the Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 17336.00600\29913156.1 173 3. Terms. 3.1 Definition; Term of Agreement. A. Definitions. 1. Commencement Date. Refers to the first date on which Police Department commences performance of surveillance activities as described in Exhibit "A". days. 2. Days - As used in this Agreement, "days" shall be calendar 3. Effective Date — Refers to the date first specified above. 4. Funding Plan — The plan included as part of the attached Exhibit "B" specifying the funding amounts and funding sources for the Project. 5. Grant Funds — The CTSGP-CTAF grant funds provided by State pursuant to the Grant Agreement, which RCTC shall provide to Police Department as a subrecipient of RCTC under this Agreement. 6. Project — The project proposed by Police Department, as described in Exhibit "A", which has been reviewed and approved by RCTC. B. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date, and shall end three (3) years after the Commencement Date, unless otherwise extended pursuant to an amendment to this Agreement, or terminated as provided herein. 3.2 Grant Terms; Police Department Responsibilities. A. Scope of Grant. Police Department shall use the Grant Funds described hereunder exclusively to implement the Project. Police Department shall be solely responsible for implementing the Project in the manner described herein. In order to ensure that the purpose for which the Grant Funds were provided to RCTC is achieved, Police Department shall complete all obligations under this Agreement and Exhibit "A" related to the provision of aerial support and surveillance, including reporting of surveillance activities, and shall maintain and utilize the equipment to be purchased under this Agreement for the entire term hereof. B. Cost Overruns. The Grant Funds described in Exhibit "B" of this Agreement are specifically for the Project and make up the entire amount which RCTC has authorized for the Project. Any subsequent amendments to the Project scope or description or additional services to be provided are not covered by this Agreement, and the funding for any such amendments or additional services shall be the sole responsibility of Police Department, unless such amendments or additional services are 2 17336.00600\29913156.1 174 approved in writing by RCTC prior to the provision of such amendments or additional services. C. Incorporation of Grant Agreement. The Grant Agreement is on file at the offices of the parties hereto, and is incorporated herein by reference. All applicable provisions of the Grant Agreement binding on RCTC, thereunder, shall apply to Police Department. By signing below, Police Department represents and warrants that it has read and is familiar with the terms of the Grant Agreement, and agrees to comply therewith. In addition, Police Department shall be responsible for including any relevant provisions of the Grant Agreement in its contracts for the Project. RCTC shall have the right to enforce the terms of the Grant Agreement as such terms apply to Police Department. In the case of a conflict between the Grant Agreement and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. D. Approval by RCTC; Responsibility of Recipient for Project Compliance with Grant Agreement. Any use of Grant Funds provided pursuant to this Agreement, other than for purchase of the equipment as specified in Exhibit "A", shall be subject to the review and approval of RCTC. If State determines that any Grant Funds were not spent in accordance with this Agreement, the Grant Agreement and in accordance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, Police Department shall be solely responsible for reimbursement of all such improperly expended funds and shall make such reimbursement in the manner specified in this Agreement. E. Funding Reimbursement by Police Department. If it is determined pursuant to a Project audit that any Grant Funds provided pursuant to this Agreement have been improperly expended, Police Department shall, at the direction of the agency performing the audit (e.g. RCTC or State), reimburse within thirty (30) days the full amount of such improperly expended funds. The funds shall be reimbursed to the agency identified by RCTC with a notice to RCTC that the reimbursement was accomplished. RCTC shall also have the right to deduct any improperly expended Grant Funds from future reimbursements of Grant Funds to Police Department. F. Cost Savings. In the event that Project costs are lower than anticipated, or that there are cost savings for any other reason, the Funding Plan shall be revised to apply such cost savings proportionately to each funding source listed in the Funding Plan. Police Department shall inform RCTC of any cost savings and the parties shall amend this Agreement to reflect the revisions to the Funding Plan. RCTC's Executive Director and the Police Chief shall be authorized to execute any such amendment. 3 17336.00600\29913156.1 175 3.3 Additional Responsibilities of Police Department A. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Police Department shall defend, indemnify and hold RCTC, State, and their directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and/or volunteers free and harmless from any and all liability from loss, damage, or injury to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any acts, omissions or willful misconduct of Police Department or any of its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, volunteers, or service providers arising out of or in connection with Police Department's performance of this Agreement, or the Project, including, without limitation, the payment of consequential damages and attorneys' fees. Further, Police Department shall defend, at its own expense, including the payment of attorneys' fees, RCTC, State, and their officials, officers, employees, agents and/or volunteers in any legal action based upon such acts, omissions or willful misconduct. Police Department shall reimburse RCTC, State, and their directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and/or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. B. Standard of Care; Performance Standards. 1. Police Department shall implement the Project in a skillful and competent manner and in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations. Police Department shall be responsible to RCTC for any errors or omissions in its execution of this Agreement or the implementation of the Project. 2. Police Department shall meet or exceed the following performance standards for the Project: a. Adhere to the timeline set forth in this Agreement or as subsequently approved by RCTC. b. Expend the funding specified herein entirely on the Project, and complete all Project obligations as specified herein and in Exhibit "A". c. Implement the Project in a manner consistent with Exhibit "A" and all provisions of this Agreement. d. Provide Project reporting to RCTC in a manner consistent with this Agreement. e. Comply with all applicable requirements and restrictions imposed by the Grant Agreement, and/or related to the Grant Funds. f. Comply with prevailing wage requirements (California Labor Code Sections 1770 et seq.), if applicable. 4 17336.00600\29913156.1 176 C. Insurance. Police Department shall obtain and require its subcontractors or sub -consultants to obtain insurance of the types and in the amounts described below for the entire term of this Agreement. 1. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Police Department shall maintain and require its consultants and contractors to maintain sufficient insurance to cover the risks associated with the Project. Such insurance shall be in an amount of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence, and $2,000,000 general aggregate. 2. Workers' Compensation Insurance. Police Department shall maintain workers' compensation insurance with statutory limits and employer's liability insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per accident. 3. Endorsements. The commercial general liability insurance policiy described above shall: a. Name RCTC, State and their officials, officers, employees, agents, and consultants, as insureds with respect to performance of this Agreement. Such insured status shall contain no special limitations on the scope of its protection to the above -listed insureds. b. Be primary and noncontributory with respect to any insurance or self-insurance programs covering RCTC, State and their directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, and consultants. c. Contain standard separation of insureds provisions. 4. Certificates/Insurer Rating/Cancellation Notice. Police Department shall, prior to receiving any funding under this Agreement, furnish to RCTC properly executed certificates of insurance, certified copies of endorsements, and policies, if requested by RCTC which shall clearly evidence all insurance required in this Section. Police Department shall not allow such insurance to be canceled, allowed to expire or be materially reduced in coverage except on thirty (30) days prior written notice to RCTC. D. Obligation to Provide Match Funding. Police Department shall provide funding at least equal to the amounts shown in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated by reference, as a match to the Grant Funds provided for the Project. E. Invoices. Police Department shall maintain and create the necessary Project invoices, records, reports and financial accounts to permit disbursement of Grant Funds to Police Department in accordance with the requirements of the Grant Agreement. Final invoices for the Project shall be submitted to RCTC no later than sixty (60) days following the termination date of this Agreement to ensure eligibility for reimbursement. 5 17336.00600\29913156.1 177 3.4 RCTC's Rights and Responsibilities. A. Disbursement of Funds. RCTC shall disburse Grant Funds in an amount up to that shown in Exhibit "B", Funding Plan, for the Project. RCTC shall promptly disburse Grant Funds to Police Department upon receipt thereof, for eligible Project costs, from State. B. Time Extensions. RCTC will consider requests for extensions of time if the reason for delay is above and beyond the Police Department's control. 4. Accounting Records. 4.1 Retention of Records. Police Department shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to costs incurred and other records generated under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Police Department shall allow representatives of RCTC and State during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records. Police Department shall maintain all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the expiration of this Agreement and shall allow inspection hereunder during such time. 4.2 Accounting of Funds. When requested by RCTC, Police Department shall within fifteen (15) days provide RCTC with a full reporting and accounting of all Grant Funds received pursuant to this Agreement during its term. 5. Project Reports - Quarterly Reporting: Police Department shall prepare and submit to RCTC quarterly milestone reports detailing the Project's progress including a financial status report and milestone progress report, and any other items specified in Exhibit "A", in a form approved by RCTC, and in accordance with all requirements of State. Project reports may be subject to review, comment and approval by State. Police Department shall revise Project reports as necessary to obtain RCTC and State approval. 6. General Provisions. 6.1 Relationship of Parties. Police Department is solely responsible for the Project. This Agreement does not create a joint venture or any partnership between Police Department and RCTC. Police Department and any persons or entities retained by Police Department or any contractor of Police Department shall be retained on an independent contractor basis and shall not be employees or agents of RCTC. 6.2 Termination of Agreement. A. RCTC may, by written notice to Police Department terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, by giving written notice to Police Department of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof. Police Department may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. Upon receipt of notice of termination, Police Department shall immediately cease expenditure 6 17336.00600\29913156.1 178 of Grant Funds conveyed pursuant to this Agreement and promptly return all unexpended Grant Funds to RCTC or as RCTC may direct. B. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided in subsection A of this Section, RCTC may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. C. If this Agreement is terminated as provided in subsection A of this Section, RCTC may require Police Department, when implementing a Project, to provide to RCTC all finished or unfinished documents, including but not exclusive to, data, studies, drawings, and reports, prepared by Police Department in connection with the performance of this Agreement. 6.3 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: To RCTC: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor P. O. Box 12008 Riverside, California 92502-2208 Attn: Anne Mayer, Executive Director To Police Department: Attn : Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Notice may also be provided via electronic mail and shall be deemed made the date sent, provided that any notice sent via electronic mail shall also be sent by U.S. mail, per the requirements set forth in the foregoing sentence, within twenty-four (24) hours of the notice via electronic mail. Notice sent via electronic mail that is not followed by notice sent via U.S. mail, as required in this paragraph, shall not be considered notice for purposes of this Agreement. 6.4 Attorneys' Fees. If any party commences an action against the other arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party's reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suits. 6.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, 7 17336.00600\29913156.1 179 understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified in writing, signed by both parties. 6.6 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 6.7 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 6.8 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties, and shall not be assigned by Police Department without the prior written consent of RCTC. 6.9 Administration. A. RCTC's Executive Director, or his or her designee, shall administer this Agreement on behalf of RCTC. B. Police Department hereby designates the Police Chief, or his or her designee, to act as its representative to administer this Agreement on behalf of Police Department ("Police Department's Representative"). Police Department's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of Police Department for all purposes under this Agreement. C. RCTC's Executive Director and the City Manager shall have the authority to amend this Agreement to revise Exhibit "B", the Funding Plan, as needed, to reflect actual Project costs, provided that the total amount of funding to be provided by RCTC under this Agreement shall not exceed Two Hundred Forty Four Thousand, Six Hundred Thirty Seven Dollars ($244,637). 6.10 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement is held to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, to any extent, by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and each term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 6.11 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and delivered in any number of counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute the same agreement. Facsimile signatures shall be considered originals. 6.12 Incorporation of Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Agreement by reference as though fully set forth herein. 6.13 Incorporation of Exhibit. This Agreement contains two (2) exhibits (Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B") which are attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by reference. 8 17336.00600\29913156.1 180 6.14 Legal Authority. RCTC and Police Department represent and warrant that the persons signing below on behalf of each party is duly authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of its respective party and that, by so executing, the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement. [Signatures on following page] 9 17336.00600\29913156.1 181 SIGNATURE PAGE TO PROPOSITION 1 B CALIFORNIA TRANSIT SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM-CALIFORNIA TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT AGREEMENT NO. 17-33-117-00 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the Agreement as of the Effective Date. RCTC: POLICE DEPARTMENT: RIVERSIDE COUNTY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: By: Anne Mayer, Executive Director Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Best Best & Krieger LLP By: By: Counsel to the Riverside County Transportation Commission 10 Title: ATTEST: By: Title: 17336.00600\29913156.1 182 EXHIBIT "A" Project Description RCTC shall provide CTSGP-CTAF grant funding to assist Police Department with the purchase of a new FLIR 380 HDc thermal imaging sensor (see product specification sheet attached hereto as Exhibit A-1), and for no other purpose. Police Department shall complete the purchase in accordance with applicable City procedures, rules and regulations. Police Department shall maintain, at its sole cost, the equipment to be purchased under this Agreement in good condition and repair for the term of this Agreement. The FLIR 380 HDc will expand the abilities of Police Department's aerial support, as it will provide state-of-the-art high definition imaging capabilities to newly acquired augmented reality based mapping systems. When combined, these two systems will facilitate Police Department aircrews to efficiently and effectively monitor "critical infrastructure" identified by the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI). A number of RCTC facilities, including rail lines, are identified as UASI assets. As the funding source was intended to be used for the provision of security equipment at the RCTC Metrolink commuter rail stations, in return for the CTSGP-CTAF grant funding to be provided under this Agreement, Police Department shall provide (i) aerial surveillance patrols twice daily (both day and night) and support to RCTC related facilities (all RCTC Metrolink commuter rail stations and related rail lines) in the cities of Riverside and Corona; (ii) bi-weekly patrols of RCTC Metrolink commuter rail stations and related rail lines in the Perris area, and (iii) additional surveillance assistance for major incidents and as otherwise reasonably requested by RCTC. These patrols shall utilize the FLIR 380 HDc, as well as the aircraft's spotlight, to provide both discreet and indiscreet security checks. In the event of a major incident (i.e. derailment, significant accident, natural disaster, and/or terrorism), the FLIR 380 HDc shall assist the aircrew in providing a solid aerial command and control platform to ground personnel. This includes providing high definition video downlink capabilities to both RCTC and 17336.00600\29913156.1 Exhibit A 183 emergency personnel. The Project will enhance the overall security monitoring of the RCTC Metrolink commuter rail stations and related facilities. Police Department shall track all aerial security checks and additional requests for assistance made by RCTC and shall provide logged history to RCTC on a quarterly basis to ensure the aerial surveillance is being completed per the terms of this Agreement. Quarterly reports shall include observed activity at the commuter rail stations and on the RCTC rail right of way. Logged history of aerial security may be requested by RCTC on a more frequent basis, if necessary, and shall be made available to RCTC upon request. Police Department is anticipated to commence aerial surveillance in December 2017. RCTC staff will work cooperatively with Police Department staff to obtain Project milestone progress until the aerial surveillance equipment is installed and put into service. 17336.00600\29913156.1 Exhibit A 184 EXHIBIT A-1 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS SHEET OFLIR QUOTATION NUMBERPDX1702-21C SU RVEI LLANCE-ORDERS@FLIR.COM RJR SURVEILLANCE, 27700SW Parloimy Wilsonville, OR T: (503) 498-3547 F: (503) 498-3904 Mk= RJR tOC Pbcnc Eno* Prepared By: NG Avenue 97070 1-1un-2017 Brian Spillane 714-420-6940 Irian_ spillane(a,flircom Opole Prepared Riverside Police 7020. Central Ave Riverside, C4 92504 Attn: Phone: Email: End User: Product: Platform Type: For Department Segeant Erik Lindgren (951)320-8078 -_indgrenArieersirl- Riverside Police Department Star SAFIRE 380-H0c MD500 KSmith ITEM QTY PN .Star SAFIRE 380-HDc DESCRIPTION UNIT LIST PRICE (US$) Discount Price (US$) EXTENDED PRICE (US$) 1 2 1 1 3290008-XXX 4127344 3204853-1D High Definition Thermal I m aging Camera includes th a following components: $ 439,000 $ 15,750 $ 439,000 $ 15,750 (IFUl 9bh%ed Turet ELM Unit • (MWIR) Infrared Imager 1280 FPA • (HDEO) High-Def 10811p w/40x zoom • (EURO Eye -Safe Laser Rangefinder • (IMU) GeoPoint Package: IMU • (AT) Automatic Video Tracker • (LIU) Laser Interlock Unit (non -back lit) • R5422 PEA) & Ethernet Map Interface (Serial Type A Protocol) • Operator Manual • 12 Muth / 1000 Hour Warranty, Parts and labor • Color: Black • Video Format: NTSC (MEM Udversal Hard Control Unit ADDITIONAL PAYLOADS 3 1 • (LP) Laser Pointer, Near-IR (15OmW) $ 15,750 $ 15,750 ACCESSORIES {Discount pricing applicable only when purchased with item 1) 4 1 3206461 UHCU Cale fsten9co Coil Cord $ 1,095 $ 931 $ 931 5 1 3210685-X GPS Antenna -(Dual Band 11/12) Choose black or white $ 1,898 $ 1,613 $ 1,613 6 1 32106951C180 GPS Cable Assembly- 185' terminated one end $ 502 $ 427 $ 427 7 1 41401101 AFM-DTFER-1 Aviation Adaptor Plate $ 6,520 $ 5,542 $ 5,542 8 1 13359405 Lower Dovetail Mourn $ 4,000 $ 3,400 $ 3,400 9 1 3203771 Nitrogen Purge / RII System Support at $ 1,814 $ 1y42 $ 1,542 TRAINING & EXTENDED WARRANTY 10 1 WARRANIY-EXT- 12 2nd year Extended Warranty -(EW-DOM/ElD380/1YR) $ 30,350 $ 30,350 SHIPPING 11 I 1 'FREIGHT 'Fed Ex 2-Day Shipping (De livery to a US Address) I$ 333' I$ 333 EQUIPMENT SUBTOTAL $ 514,637 TRADE IN ALLOWANCE 1 Trade-in Allunance Star SAFIRE 230HD with external IMU serial BX0041 $ (150A) $ (150,000) PACKAGE TOTAL $ 364,637 Exhibit A 17336.00600\29913156.1 185 EXHIBIT "B" FUNDING PLAN Total Equipment Cost FLIR 380 HDc Purchase Price Police Department Match Funding RPD FLIR 230 Trade -In RPD FLIR 8500 (x2) / 2000 Trade -In CA-DOJ Funding RCTC Funding - Utilizing Grant Funds $514,637.00 $150,000.00 $35,000.00 $85,000.00 $244,637.00 17336.00600\29913156.1 Exhibit B 186 AGENDA ITEM 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Jillian Guizado, Senior Legislative Affairs Analyst Aaron Hake, External Affairs Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: State and Federal Legislative Update BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt the following bill position: a) AB 1282 (Mullin) — Support; and 2) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation. DISCUSSION: State Update AB 1282 (Mullin) — Staff Recommendation: SUPPORT AB 1282 requires the California State Transportation Agency Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary for the Natural Resources Agency, to establish a Transportation Permitting Task Force. The task force also includes these state agencies: Environmental Protection, California Transportation Commission, Department of Transportation, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Department of Water Resources, California Coastal Commission, and any other relevant agencies. The intended goal of the task force is to develop a process that will reduce permit processing time, establish reasonable deadlines for permit approvals, and provide for greater certainty of permit approval requirements relating to the development of transportation projects. The author introduced this bill, in part, in response to a recommendation made by the California Transportation Commission in its 2016 annual report. Specifically, the report "recommends that the Legislature create a task force comprised of state environmental permitting agencies and transportation entities to establish a process for early engagement of all parties in project development to reduce permit processing time, establish reasonable deadlines for permit approvals, and provide greater certainty of permit approval requirements." The Commission has Agenda Item 8 187 often found the process and time for permit approvals can be inconsistent and result in delays and cost increases on important projects. The establishment of this task force, with widespread representation from multiple perspectives, has the potential of improving the overall process. If approved, the task force would be required to submit a report of finding and recommendations to the Legislature by December 1, 2018. If approved, staff would welcome providing input. State Budget Update By the time this staff report was written, the Legislature was finalizing the package of bills constituting the FY 2017/18 State Budget. A verbal update will be provided to the Committee on the details in the budget relating to transportation. Federal Update Infrastructure Plan Few details about the Trump Administration's infrastructure plan have emerged. What has been released so far is a proposal to fund $200 billion in infrastructure and reduce the permit process time by eight years. Staff continues to watch for emerging details on the infrastructure plan and will provide updates as information is received. Federal Discretionary Grants On May 31, 2017, the Federal Railroad Administration and the Federal Transit Administration awarded a $3.2 million Positive Train Control (PTC) grant to Metrolink "to develop, test, and deploy tools and processes to improve the reliability, efficiency, and security of SCRRA's Interoperable Electronic Train Management System PTC system." The grant to Metrolink is one of 17 awarded. PTC discretionary grant funding is only authorized in FY 2016/17 of the five-year Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act. On June 9, 2017, the Commission's Multimodal Services Department submitted an application to the Federal Highway Administration under the Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment (ATCMTD) program. The project submitted for consideration would create the State Route 91 Multimodal Corridor Management project, a partnership between Caltrans District 8, the city of Riverside, the Commission, Metrolink, Riverside Transit Authority, and the University of California Riverside. The project would allow travelers to make informed decisions and comparisons regarding travel time and costs via driving, bus, and commuter rail, then facilitate diversion to those modes using in-app navigation to park and ride lots, synchronization with transit schedules, and signal priority for transit buses. Staff will continue to work with the region's Congressional delegation to pursue these funds. Attachment: Legislative Matrix Agenda Item 8 188 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - POSITIONS ON STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION —July 2017 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption AB 1189 (Garcia) Clarifying legislation that allows the Commission to implement a second self- help sales tax, subject to approval of two-thirds of the electorate in a future election. Passed Senate Transportation and Housing Committee. Set for hearing in Senate Governance and Finance on June 28, 2017. (June 13, 2017) SPONSOR 1/26/217 AB 91 (Cervantes) Requires Caltrans to convert existing HOV lanes in Riverside County to operate only during hours of heavy commuter traffic; during all other times the lanes would be open to all vehicles, including those with a single occupant. Passed Assembly Floor; with Senate Rules Committee. (June 1, 2017) OPPOSE Opposition removed 5/30/17 as a result of amendments 3/8/17 AB 351 (Melendez) Proposes to bring truck weight fees back to transportation accounts. Referred to Committee on Transportation. May be heard in committee after March 10. (February 21, 2017) SUPPORT 3/8/17 AB 179 (Cervantes) Changes the membership of the California Transportation Commission. Passed Assembly Floor; referred to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee. (June 8, 2017) OPPOSE 4/12/2017 AB 408 (Chen) Final offer of compensation in eminent domain cases. Died prior to going to committee pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a). (March 20, 2017) OPPOSE 4/12/2017 AB 697 (Fong) Exempts private ambulances from paying tolls when responding to emergency and urgent calls. Passed Assembly Floor; referred to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee. (June 8, 2017) OPPOSE Opposition removed 6/14/2017 as a result of amendments 4/12/2017 189 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption SB 132 (Budget and Fiscal Review Committee) Amendment to the Budget Act of 2016. Creates the Riverside County Transportation Efficiency Corridor. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (April 28, 2017) SUPPORT 4/12/2017 SB 268 (Mendoza) Changes the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority board of directors governance structure. Passed Senate Floor; read first time in Assembly and held at desk. (June 1, 2017) OPPOSE 5/9/2017 Staff action based on platform AB 1523 (Obernolte) Authorizes the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) to use design -build for local agencies to reconstruct the Mt. Vernon Avenue Viaduct project in San Bernardino. Passed Assembly Floor; referred to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee. (June 8, 2017) SUPPORT 5/10/2017 SB 150 (Allen) Requires the state board to update and revise greenhouse gas emission reduction targets while considering vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reductions. Requires the state board to assess current and historic VMT. Requires the state to prepare a report every four years that assesses metropolitan planning organization progress toward meeting metrics. Passed Senate Floor; referred to Assembly Transportation, Natural Resources Committees. (June 8, 2017) OPPOSE 5/10/2017 SB 264 (Nguyen) Requires net excess toll revenue from the Orange County Transportation Authority's (OCTA) Interstate 405 Improvement Project to be allocated to OCTA and project corridor jurisdictions and requires the moneys to be spent on specified transportation improvement projects. Hearing in Transportation and Housing Committee scheduled for April 25; author cancelled hearing. (April 25, 2017) OPPOSE 5/10/2017 SB 477 (Cannella) Allows for the extension of an existing rail corridor to provide intercity rail service beyond the defined boundaries of the corridor, subject to approval by the joint powers authority board and Secretary of Transportation. Passed Senate Floor; read first time in Assembly and held at desk. (June 1, 2017) SUPPORT 5/10/2017 AB 686 (Santiago) Requires agencies to "affirmatively further fair housing" opportunity with all governmental actions. Passed Assembly Floor; with Senate Rules Committee. (June 1, 2017) OPPOSE 6/14/2017 SB 768 (Allen, Wiener) Extends authority to Caltrans and regional transportation agencies to enter into public private partnership agreements for transportation projects. 190 Held in Senate Appropriations Committee. (May 25, 2017) SUPPORT 6/14/2017 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption H.R.100 (Brownley) Increases the sub -allocation for local communities under the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG). Referred to House T&I subcommittee on Highways and Transit. (January 3, 2017) SUPPORT 6/14/2017 AB 115 (Ting); SB 99 (Budget) Trailer bills containing elements that will streamline transportation project delivery. Ordered to third reading. (June 14, 2017) SUPPORT 6/14/2017 Staff action based on platform AB 805 (Gonzalez Fletcher) Changes the San Diego Association of Governments board of directors governance and voting structure. Passed Assembly Floor; referred to Senate Governance and Finance and Transportation and Housing Committees. (June 14, 2017) OPPOSE 6/15/2017 Staff action based on platform 191 STATE AN D FEDERAL LEG ISLA-111/E UPDATE July 12, 2017 Aaron Hake, External Affairs Director a` State Budget 4 Special Authorities for Flverside County Budget &II Tra ile r Bill AB 115 Tra ile r Bill SB 107 What the &II Does Funds California through June 30, 2018 New authorities in Riverside County for innovative delivery: CM/GC, A+B, Design -Build on five projects funded by SB 1/SB 132 (RC1EC) and others; sole - source contracting for 15/91 connector Appropriatesfundsto RCTEC project sponsors; typo correction Legislature Status Pa ssc d Pa ssc d Pa ssc d Govemor Status Signed Signed Traditional Project Delivery: Design- Bid- Build Design -Sequencing —An Experiment Design -Sequencing — An Experiment Plus Lessons Learned oF Tolling Design -Build Opportunity meets Preparation • State $ for five projects • 2023 deadline • Toskforceto accelerate projects _ -�- W� -. �. • Construction Manager/General Contractor Design -Build A+B Bidding Sole Source for 15/91 Express Lane Connector Direct Allocation of Funds llTime to Deliver 16,11.1le OFuraL 110[:1 CENt%i 25 KG Design -build authority on 1-15 Design -build authority on SR91 Tolling authority_ on SR91 and 1-15 Design sequencing on 60/91/215 interchange Traditional project delivery: sequential, slow, lessinnovation CM/GC autho on Mid -County Pa rkw a y CM/GC,A+B, and Design -build authority on 5 RC TEC projects Project Delivery Authorities AGENDA ITEM 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee LoreIle Moe -Luna, Senior Management Analyst Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Years 2017/18 — 2021/22 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans for the Local Streets and Roads Program BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the Fiscal Years 2017/18 — 2021/22 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Local Streets and Roads (LSR) as submitted by the participating agencies; and BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The 2009 Measure A provides member agencies with local funding for street maintenance and operations, street repairs, street improvements, and new infrastructure of their local streets and roads systems. As outlined in the Ordinance No. 02-001, Measure A funds are allocated within the three geographic areas: Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley. LSR receives 29 percent of the Measure A distribution in Western County, 35 percent in Coachella Valley, and 100 percent in Palo Verde Valley. In the Western County and Palo Verde Valley, funds are to be distributed by a formula based on 75 percent on proportionate population from the State Department of Finance and 25 percent on Measure A sales tax revenues generated within each jurisdiction. In Coachella Valley, funds are distributed based on 50 percent on proportionate dwelling units and 50 percent on Measure A revenues within each jurisdiction. Since the commencement of the 2009 Measure A in July 2009 through March 31, 2017, the cities and the county of Riverside have received over $337 million. Measure A imposes several requirements on local agencies in order to receive LSR funds. First, the Coachella Valley and Western County cities and the county of Riverside must participate in either the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) or Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. Western County agencies must also participate in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Agenda Item 9 192 Conservation Plan (MSHCP) managed by the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA). Additionally, agencies are required to annually provide to the Commission a project status report for the prior year CIP, a five-year CIP detailing how the Measure A funds are to be expended, and an annual certification of Maintenance of Effort to ensure Measure A funds do not supplant local discretionary funds for LSR improvements. DISCUSSION: On February 6, 2017, staff provided the local agencies with a five-year Measure A revenue projection, which is attached, for LSR to assist in preparation of the required CIP. The required plans and supporting documentation have been received from all of the participating Measure A agencies and have been reviewed by staff to ensure compliance with Measure A requirements. Staff recommends approval of the FYs 2017/18 — 2021/22 Measure A Five -Year CIPs. The FY 2017/18 Measure A LSR disbursements to eligible local agencies with a Commission - approved CIP is expected to occur in September 2017. Eligibility determinations related to participation in the TUMF programs are complete for Coachella Valley and Western County agencies. Verification of participation in RCA's MSHCP is expected prior to the initial FY 2017/18 Measure A LSR disbursements. Attachments: 1) Five -Year Measure A Revenue Projections for Local Streets and Roads 2) FYs 2017/18 — 2021/22 CIPs (Posted on the Commission Website) Agenda Item 9 193 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A PROGRAM ALLOCATION (PROJECTION) LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FY 2016/17 (revised) FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22 Western County BANNING $ 544,000 $ 552,000 $ 563,000 $ 574,000 $ 585,000 $ 597,000 BEAUMONT' CALI M ESA 156,000 155,000 158,000 161,000 164,000 167,000 CANYON LAKE 174,000 174,000 177,000 181,000 185,000 189,000 CORONA 3,837,000 3,950,000 4,029,000 4,110,000 4,192,000 4,276,000 EASTVALE 1,183,000 1,255,000 1,280,000 1,306,000 1,332,000 1,359,000 H EM ET 1,677,000 1,656,000 1,689,000 1,723,000 1,757,000 1,792,000 JURUPA VALLEY 1,874,000 1,896,000 1,934,000 1,973,000 2,012,000 2,052,000 LAKE ELSINORE 1,205,000 1,280,000 1,306,000 1,332,000 1,359,000 1,386,000 M EN I FEE 1,528,000 1,624,000 1,656,000 1,689,000 1,723,000 1,757,000 MORENO VALLEY 3,703,000 3,829,000 3,906,000 3,984,000 4,064,000 4,145,000 MURRIETA 2,176,000 2,299,000 2,345,000 2,392,000 2,440,000 2,489,000 NORCO 611,000 643,000 656,000 669,000 682,000 696,000 PERRIS 1,446,000 1,476,000 1,506,000 1,536,000 1,567,000 1,598,000 RIVERSIDE 7,006,000 7,280,000 7,426,000 7,575,000 7,727,000 7,882,000 SAN JACINTO 797,000 836,000 853,000 870,000 887,000 905,000 TEMECULA 2,834,000 2,929,000 2,988,000 3,048,000 3,109,000 3,171,000 WILDOMAR 584,000 604,000 616,000 628,000 641,000 654,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 5,429,000 5,211,000 5,315,000 5,421,000 5,529,000 5,640,000 RCTC Regional Arterial' 805,000 866,000 883,000 901,000 919,000 937,000 SUBTOTAL -Western County 37,569,000 38,515,000 39,286,000 40,073,000 40,874,000 41,692,000 Coachella Valley CATHEDRAL CITY 1,409,000 1,461,000 1,490,000 1,520,000 1,550,000 1,581,000 COACHELLA 612,000 602,000 614,000 626,000 639,000 652,000 DESERT HOT SPRINGS 472,000 466,000 475,000 485,000 495,000 505,000 INDIAN WELLS 267,000 232,000 237,000 242,000 247,000 252,000 INDIO 1,809,000 1,866,000 1,903,000 1,941,000 1,980,000 2,020,000 LA QUINTA2 1,470,000 1,449,000 1,478,000 1,508,000 1,538,000 1,569,000 PALM DESERT 2,666,000 2,660,000 2,713,000 2,767,000 2,822,000 2,878,000 PALM SPRINGS 2,006,000 2,007,000 2,047,000 2,088,000 2,130,000 2,173,000 RANCHO MIRAGE 870,000 874,000 891,000 909,000 927,000 946,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1,881,000 1,743,000 1,778,000 1,814,000 1,850,000 1,887,000 CVAG' - - - - SUBTOTAL -Coachella Valley 13,462,000 13,360,000 13,626,000 13,900,000 14,178,000 14,463,000 Palo Verde Valley BLYTHE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUBTOTAL -Palo Verde Valley 921,000 826,000 231,000 189,000 843,000 860,000 193,000 197,000 877,000 895,000 201,000 205,000 1,152,000 1,015,000 1,036,000 1,057,000 1,078,000 1,100,000 TOTAL $ 52,183,000 $ 52,890,000 $ 53,948,000 $ 55,030,000 $ 56,130,000 $ 57,255,000 Beaumont is not eligible for Measure A local streets and roads funds and its share is allocated to the Western County Measure A Regional Arterial fund. z Under an agreement between CVAG and La Quinta, CVAG receives 50% of La Quinta's allocation and La Quinta the remaining 50% until such time La Quinta has reimbursed CVAG for TUMF fees CVAG would have received from La Quinta if La Quinta had joined the TUMF program when the TUMF was established. Note: Estimate for Planning Purposes, subject to change and rounding differences. 194 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF BANNING This page left intentionally blank. City of Banning Public Works Department STAGECOACH TOWN USA Proud History -Prosperous Tomorrow April 18, 2017 Grace Alvarez, Programming and Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 prECEOVE APR 20 2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Subject: Five -Year (FY 2017/2018 — 2021/2022) Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan Dear Ms. Alvarez: J The City of Banning respectfully submits its Five -Year Measure "A" Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2017/2018 — 2021/2022 as approved by the City Council during its regular meeting on April 11, 2017. Also enclosed with this letter you will find the City's MOE Certification Statement, Project Status Reports for FY 2015/2016 and FY 2016/2017 along with a certified copy of the Resolution approving the Five -Year Measure "A" CIP Plan. Please note that the Project Status Report for projects listed in the FY 2015/2016 CIP have been revised to modify Item No. 4 "Nicolet Street: Sims Street to 16th Street" and add Item No. 7 "Sim Street: Nicolet Street to Williams Street; and 2nd & PI Street: Livington Street to Hays Street". Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at (951) 922-3130. Sincerely, Art Vela, P.E. Director of Public Works Copy: File Enc. Certified Resolution Five -Year Measure "A" Plan Project Status Reports MOE Certification Statement 99 E. Ramsey St. • P.O. Box 998 • Banning, CA 92220-0998 • (951) 922-3130 • Fax (951) 922-3141 RESOLUTION 2017-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BANNING, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEASURE "A" FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT WHEREAS, in 1988, Riverside County voters approved a 0.5% sales tax (Measure "A") over a 20-year span to be used toward improvements of state highways, local transit systems, and public streets; and WHEREAS, in 2002, Riverside County voters approved a 30-year extension of the Measure "A" 0.5% sales tax; and WHEREAS, each City in Riverside County is required by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) to submit a Five Year Capital Improvement Plan, attached hereto, as approved by its governing board, to indicate how Measure "A" funding is to be utilized over the next five years; and WHEREAS, the RCTC has estimated that the City of Banning will receive a total of $2,871,000 in Measure "A" funds over the next five years; and WHEREAS, the program is intended to support local transit systems, street pavement rehabilitation and public street improvements; and WHEREAS, the Measure "A" Ordinance requires annual certification that discretionary General Fund expenditures for transportation -related construction and maintenance activities for Fiscal Year 2017/2018 will meet or exceed the Maintenance of Effort Certification (MOE) base year amount and commitment to expending Measure "A" funds to projects identified in the City's Five Year CIP; and WHEREAS, the priority list of street locations can be changed by the City Council by submitting a written request to RCTC. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Banning as follows: SECTION 1. City Council adopts Resolution 2017-34, approving the Measure 'A' Five Year Capital Improvement Plan. SECTION 2. The City Manager is authorized to execute the Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement. Reso. 2017-34 1 CERTIFIED TO BE A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT uN FILE IN THE OFFICE Of IHE CIifY CLEF:i. L"-natt; Q eadam-- BY TITLE C <<'-6 DATE SF 13 '47 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 11th day opril, 2017. Gee•' •t- Moyer, ayor City of Banning ATTEST: /2111zi".aeie.te? Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL CONTENT: John . Cotti, Interim City Attorney Jenkins & Hogin, LLP CERTIFICATION: I, Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk of the City of Banning, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2017-34 was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Banning at a Regular Meeting thereof held on the 11th of April, 2017. AYES: Councilmembers Andrade, Franklin, Peterson, welch, Mayor Moyer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Reso. 2017-34 2 Marie A. Calderon, City Clerk City of Banning, Califomia FY 2017/2018 MEASURE A PROGRAM MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the CITY OF BANNING (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Measure "A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $164,325.00, approved by the Commission at its July 11, 2012 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary Local Funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure "A" funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: �--/f- /i , 2017 Michael Rock, City Manager Attest: City Clerk RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016/2017 Agency: City of Banning Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Kevin Sin, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 3-8-17 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status 1 Nicolet Street: Sims Street to AC Overlay $ 310,000 $ 310,000 6/8/2017 Under construction Sunset Avenue 2 FTIP: Ramsey Street: Hargrave Street to East City Limits AC Overlay 477,000 295,000 3/1/2018 Environmental hold up 3 Nicolet Street: McGovern Ave to AC Overlay 45,000 45,000 6/8/2017 Under construction Sunset Avenue 4 Nicolet Street: Sims Street to 16th AC Overlay 20,000 20,000 6/8/2017 Under construction Street 5 Ramsey Street: San Gorgonio AC Overlay 300,000 300,000 6/8/2017 Under construction Avenue to 4th Street 6 City Wide Slurry Seal Slurry Seal 110,000 110,000 6/8/2017 Under construction 7 Sims Street: Nicolet St. to Williams AC Overlay 100,000 100,000 6/8/2017 Under construction St.; and 2nd & 3rd Street: Livington St. to Hays St. 8 City -Wide Various Streets AC Overlay 546,000 546,000 12/30/2017 Scheduled to bid on Improvements (Theodore St.: June 1, 2017 Alessandro Rd to Almond Way, 8th Street: Lincoln St to Westward AVe, Charles Street: Hargrave Ave to 1037 E. Charles St., and Wesley Street: Hargrave Ave to 1041 E. Wesley St.) TOTALS $ 1,908,000 $ 1,726,000 Note: An amendment is requested to revise Item No. 4 "Nicolet Street: Sims Street to 6th Street' and add Item No. 7 "Sim Street: Nicolet St. to Williams St.; and 2nd & 3rd Street: Livington St. to Hays St." to the approved FY 2016/17 CIP. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017/2018 Agency: City of Banning Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Kevin Sin, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 3-8-17 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 2,012,674 FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: 544,000 FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: (1,726,000) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 830,674 Estimated FY 2017/2018 Measure A Allocation: 552,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017/2018 Projects: $ 1,382,674 FY 2017/2018 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Sun Lakes Boulevard Extension: Highland Environmental $ 1,200,000 $ 1,190,033 Home Road to Sunset Avenue Document and Plans, Specs and Estimates Only 2 SB 821 Match - Christie Street: Almond Way to Blanchard St.; Christie Street: Cherry St. to Allen St.; Sun Lakes Blvd: 480' west of Lakes Retirement Community Street and Sidewalk construction, curb and gutter 188,278 122,967 TOTALS $ 1,388,278 $ 1,313,000 Balance: $ 69,674 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018/2019 Agency: City of Banning Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Kevin Sin, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 3-8-17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2018/2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018/2019 Projects: $ FY 2018/2019 69,674 563,000 632,674 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Cottonwood Road: 8th Street to 12th Street AC Overlay $ 100,000 $ 100,000 2 George Street: 8th Street to 12th Street AC Overlay 100,000 100,000 3 10th Street: Williams Street to George AC Overlay 115,000 115,000 Street 4 12th Street Williams Street to George Street AC Overlay 122,000 122,000 5 14th Street: Williams Street to George AC Overlay 120,000 120,000 Street TOTALS $ 557,000 $ 557,000 Balance: $ 75,674 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019/2020 Agency: City of Banning Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Kevin Sin, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 3-8-17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2019/2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019/2020 Projects: $ FY 2019/2020 75,674 574,000 649,674 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Indian School Lane: 8th Street to San AC Overlay $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Gorgonio Avenue 2 Lincoln Street: San Gorgonio Avenue to AC Overlay 300,000 300,000 Hargrave Street 3 City Wide Slurry Seal Slurry Seal 91,000 91,000 TOTALS $ 591,000 $ 591,000 Balance: $ 58,674 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020/2021 Agency: City of Banning Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Kevin Sin, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 3-8-17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2020/2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020/2021 Projects: $ FY 2020/2021 58,674 585,000 643,674 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Monroe Street: 22nd St to Jefferson St AC Overlay/Rehab $ 100,000 $ 100,000 2 Jefferson Street: Monroe St to 22nd St AC Overlay/Rehab 90,000 90,000 3 Lincoln Street: Sunset Ave to 22nd St. AC Overlay 180,000 180,000 4 George Street: Hargrave St to Hathaway AC Overlay 140,000 140,000 St 5 Citywide Slurry Seal Slurry Seal 120,000 120,000 TOTALS $ 630,000 $ 630,000 Balance: $ 13,674 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021/2022 Agency: City of Banning Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Kevin Sin, P.E. Phone #: 951-922-3130 Date: 3-8-17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2021/2022 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021/2022 Projects: $ FY 2021/2022 13,674 597,000 610,674 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Ramsey Street: 4th St. to 12th St. AC Overlay/Rehab $ 300,000 $ 300,000 2 First Street: Livington St. to Williams St. AC Overlay 85,000 85,000 3 Second Street: Hays St. to Williams St. AC Overlay 13,000 13,000 4 Third Street: Hays St. to Williams St. AC Overlay 30,000 30,000 5 Fourth Street: Livington St. to Williams St. AC Overlay 85,000 85,000 6 Second Street: Nicolet St. to George St. AC Overlay 35,000 35,000 7 Omar Street & Ramsey Street Intersection AC Overlay/Rehab 50,000 50,000 Improvements TOTALS $ 598,000 $ 598,000 Balance: $ 12,674 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF BLYTHE This page left intentionally blank. CITY OF BLYTHE DEPARIIVENT OF PUBUC WORKS /M O SOUTH MAIN STREET BLYTHE, CALIFORNIA 92225-2717 PHONE (760) 922-6611 FAX (760) 922-0278 May 11, 2017 Grace Alvarez Planning and Programming Manager Attention Lorelle Moe -Luna Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92505-2208 Subject: City of Blythe Measure A Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Dear Ms. Alvarez, Enclosed please find the City of Blythe Measure A Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2017/2018, Maintenance of Efforts Certification FY 2017/2018, and Project Status Report for CIP FY 2016/2017. Arrrl ndo :: e, P. Director o ublic Wor City of Blythe Enclosures FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Blythe (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $170,000, approved by the Commission at its April 2016 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: /1 , 2017 ATTEST: tee - SECRETARY RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Blythe Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6611 Date: May 11, 2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 2,463,550 FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: 921,000 FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: ($1,645,954) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,738,596 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 826,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 2,564,596 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Wheelchair Ramps (ADA) Construction - Annual Improvements $ 20,000 $ 10,000 2 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Pot hole repairs/street maintenance 120,000 100,000 3 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Preventive maintenance 150,000 100,000 3 Traffic Signal Rehabilitation (various locations) Pedestrian Head Replacement, Camera traffic detection system, etc. 50,000 40,000 4 7TH Street from Barnard St to Chanslorway Major reconstruction, AC pavement, base and drainage 312,480 312,480 5 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment Debt Service (2009/2019) 215,300 215,300 6 Acacia Street from Hobsonway to Barnard St Engineering - PS&E- Pavement Rehabilitation. 52,690 42,152 Major reconstruction (AC and Base) 7 Defrain Blvd. from 10th Ave to 4th Ave. Engineering - PS&E- Pavement Rehab. 157,300 125,840 8 Date Street from Hobsonway to Barnard Engineering - PS&E- Pavement Rehabilitation. 37,620 30,096 Major reconstruction (AC and Base) 9 San Luis Way from Barnard St. to Wisconsin St. Engineering - PS&E - Pavement Rehab. 32,560 26,048 10 Main Street from 14th Ave. to Chanslorway Engineering - PS&E - Pavement Rehab. 145,024 116,019 11 Administrative Overhead Administrative Overhead 66,080 66,080 TOTALS $ 1,359,054 $ 1,184,015 2017-2018 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Blythe Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6611 Date: May 11, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 1,380,581 843,000 2,223,581 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Wheelchair Ramps (ADA) Construction - Annual Improvements $ 30,000 $ 10,000 2 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Pot hole repairs/street maintenance 150,000 75,000 3 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements Grind and overlay on alleys 100,000 50,000 4 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment Debt Service (2009/2019) 215,200 215,200 5 Date Street from Hobsonway to Barnard Major reconstruction, AC pavement, base and drainage 342,000 342,000 6 Traffic Signal Rehabilitation (various locations) Pedestrian Head Replacement 50,000 25,000 7 Administrative Overhead Administrative Overhead 67,440 67,440 TOTALS $ 954,640 $ 784,640 2018-2019 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Blythe Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6611 Date: May 11, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 1,438, 941 860,000 2,298,941 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Wheelchair Ramps (ADA) Construction - Annual Improvements $ 30,000 $ 10,000 2 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Pot hole repairs/street maintenance 150,000 100,000 3 Alleyway Improvements/Annual Improvements Grind and overlay on alleys 100,000 50,000 4 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Preventive maintenance 150,000 100,000 5 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment Debt Service (2009/2019) 215,200 215,200 6 San Luis Way from Barnard St. to Wisconsin St. AC pavement, thick overlay 296,000 296,000 7 Administrative Overhead Administrative Overhead 68,800 68,800 TOTALS $ 1,010,000 $ 840,000 2019-2020 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Blythe Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6611 Date: May 11, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 1,458, 941 877,000 2,335,941 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Wheelchair Ramps (ADA) Construction - Annual Improvements $ 30,000 $ 10,000 2 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Pot hole repairs/street maintenance 150,000 100,000 3 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Preventive maintenance 150,000 75,000 4 Traffic Signal Rehabilitation (various locations) Camera traffic detection system 50,000 25,000 5 Main Street from 14th Ave. to Chanslorway AC pavement, thick overlay 1,648,000 1,648,000 6 Administrative Overhead Administrative Overhead 70,160 70,160 TOTALS $ 2,098,160 $ 1,928,160 2020-2021 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Blythe Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6611 Date: May 11, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2020 - 2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 407,781 895,000 1,302, 781 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 1 Wheelchair Ramps (ADA) Construction - Annual Improvements $ 30,000 $ 10,000 2 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Pot hole repairs/street maintenance 150,000 100,000 3 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Preventive maintenance 150,000 75,000 4 Traffic Signal Rehabilitation (various locations) Camera traffic detection system 50,000 25,000 3 Acacia Street from Hobsonway to Barnard St Major reconstruction, AC pavement, base and drainage 479,000 479,000 4 Administrative Overhead Administrative Overhead 71,600 71,600 TOTALS $ 930,600 $ 760,600 2021-2022 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Blythe Prepared by: Armando Baldizzone Phone #: (760) 922-6611 Date: May 11, 2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 2016/17 Fog, Chip & Slurry Seal Construction $150,000 $0 June 2017 Annual project 2 2016/17 Asphalt Emulsion Oil/Base Material (Annual Stock) Construction $120,000 $100,000 June 2017 Annual Stock Material 3 2016/17 14TH Ave. from Lovekin Blvd to Braodway Construction $458,000 $457,696 November 2016 Completed 4 2016/17 N and S Broadway from 14th Ave to Chanslorway Construction $1,111,000 $563,471 June 2017 In progress 60% completed 5 2009/19 Lovekin/Chanslorway Loan Advance Payment (Debt Service) Debt Payment $215,000 $215,300 Sept 2019 Last payment due Sept 2019 6 2016/17 Administrative Overhead Administrative Overhead $74,000 $73,680 June 2016 Annual admin charges 7 2016/17 N Broadway from Juniper to 10th Avenue Construction $451,000 $72,007 May 2017 In progress 90% completed 8 2016/17 6th Avenue Road Improvement (County/City Agreement) Construction $164,000 $163,800 April 2017 Completed TOTALS $2,743,000 $1,645,954 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost STIP Funds Estimated Completion Status 9 10 2016/17 N and S Broadway from 14th Ave to Chanslorway 2016/17 N Broadway from Juniper to 10th Avenue Construction (STIP Trade) Construction (STIP Trade) $1,111,000 $451,000 $547,294 $379,000 June 2017 May 2017 In progress 60% completed In progress 90% completed Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF CALIMESA This page left intentionally blank. City of Calimesa May 4, 2017 LoreIle Moe -Luna Senior Management Analyst Planning and Programming 4080 Lemon St., 3rd Floor Riverside, Ca 92501 Re: City of Calimesa Measure A Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2018-2022 Dear Ms. Moe -Luna: Enclosed please find the City of Calimesa Measure A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2018-2022, Maintenance of Effort Certification for Fiscal Year 2017-18 and the Project Status Report for Fiscal Year 2016-17. Please let me know if you should have any questions. Sincerely, onnie Johns° City Manager 908 Park Avenue • Calimesa, California 92320 • (909) 795-9801 FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Calimesa (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $2,401, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: May 4, 2017 BONNIE JOHNS° , TY MANAGER ATTEST: DARLENE GERDES, CITY CL RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Calimesa Bonnie Johnson 909-795-9801 05/08/17 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 830,340 156,000 (435,509) $ 550,831 155,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 705,831 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 2065 Donna Lane Pavement Rehab (bal. from 2016-17) Pavement Rehabilitation $ 78,000 $ 78,000 **2067 5th St. Pavement Rehab (bal. from 2016-17) Pavement Rehabilitation 161,000 142,000 2064 Avenue L Slurry Seal Pavement Slurry 91,000 37,000 2066 Brady Lane Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation 82,000 82,000 0000 Indirect Costs - Administration Indirect Costs 12,400 12,400 TOTALS $ 424,400 $ 351,400 ** $19,000 to be funded from other sources FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Calimesa Prepared by: Bonnie Johnson Phone #: 909-795-9801 Date: 05/08/17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 354,431 158,000 512,431 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018 - 2019 TBD Barnes Court Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation $ 49,000 $ 49,000 TBD Ward Lane Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation 47,000 47,000 2078 Citywide Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation 150,000 150,000 0000 Indirect Costs - Administration Indirect Costs 12,640 12,640 TOTALS $ 258,640 $ 258,640 FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Calimesa Prepared by: Bonnie Johnson Phone #: 909-795-9801 Date: 05/08/17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 253,791 161,000 414,791 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 TBD California Street Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation $ 105,000 $ 105,000 2078 Citywide Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation 150,000 150,000 0000 Indirect Costs - Administration Indirect Costs 12,880 12,880 TOTALS $ 267,880 $ 267,880 FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Calimesa Prepared by: Bonnie Johnson Phone #: 909-795-9801 Date: 05/08/17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 146,911 164,000 310,911 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 2078 Citywide Pavement Rehabiliation Pavement Rehabilitation $ 150,000 $ 150,000 0000 Indirect Costs - Administration Indirect Costs 13,120 13,120 TOTALS $ 163,120 $ 163,120 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Calimesa Prepared by: Bonnie Johnson Phone #: 909-795-9801 Date: 05/08/17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 147,791 167,000 314,791 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 2078 Citywide Pavement Rehabiliation Pavement Rehabilitation $ 150,000 $ 150,000 0000 Indirect Costs - Administration Indirect Costs 13,360 13,360 TOTALS $ 163,360 $ 163,360 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Calimesa Prepared by: Bonnie Johnson Phone #: 909-795-9801 Date: 05/08/17 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended 6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 2062 SR2S - 2nd St. and Avenue L Pedestrian Improvements $ 156,129 $ 156,129 Completed Completed 2065 Donna Lane Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation 83,000 5,000 In Progress Preparing Bid Specs 2067 5th St. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation 156,000 14,000 In Progress Preparing Bid Specs 2084 Calimesa Blvd Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation 341,985 247,900 Completed Completed 0000 Indirect Costs - Administration Indirect Costs 13,120 12,480 TOTALS $ 750,234 $ 435,509 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF CANYON LAKE This page left intentionally blank. CITY OF CANYON LAKE FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: FROM: Lorelle Moe -Luna Koyla MaCin COMPANY: RCTC DATE: 05/24/2017 FAX NUMBER: 951-787-7920 TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 8 PHONE NUMBER: SENDER'S EMAIL: 951-787-7934 accountant@cityofcanyonlake.com RE: SENDER'S PHONE: SENDER'S FAX: Maintenance of Effort Certification 951-244-2955 951-246 2022 ❑ URGENT ❑ FOR REVIEW ❑ PLEASE COMMENT ❑ PLEASE REPLY ❑ PLEASE RECYCLE NOTES/COMMENTS: Transmitting the CIP FY 2017/18 through 2022, Maintenance of Effort Certification, and Project Status Report for FY 2017/18 Thank you - Kayla Malin Accountant 31516 RAILROAD CANYON ROAD CANYON LAKE, CA 92587 951-244-2955 951-246-2022 FAX FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Canyon Lake (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $28,873, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 1v1 , 2017 Cu.„39 CITY MANAGER ATTEST: *Vat SECRI TARY RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Canyon Lake Danny Chow (951)244-2955 March 8, 2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 296,000 FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: 174,000 FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: (207,000) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 263,000 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 174,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 437,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan $ 84,000 $ 84,000 2 Debt Service to County 63,000 63,000 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, Signal Maint, Fence Maint, Landscaping, Lighting, Signage, and Other Maint 200,000 125,000 TOTALS $ 347,000 $ 272,000 Fund Balance: 165,000 FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Prepared by: Danny Chow Phone #: (951) 244-2955 Date: March 8, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 165,000 Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: 177,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 342,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018 - 2019 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan $ 84,000 $ 84,000 2 Debt Service to County 63,000 63,000 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, Signal Maint, Fence Maint, Landscaping, 120,000 100,000 Lighting, Signage, and Other Maint TOTALS $ 267,000 $ 247,000 Fund Balance: 95,000 FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Prepared by: Danny Chow Phone #: (951) 244-2955 Date: March 8, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 95,000 181,000 $ 276,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan $ 19,000 $ 19,000 2 Debt Service to County 27,000 27,000 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, Signal Maint, Fence Maint, Landscaping, 100,000 75,000 Lighting, Signage, and Other Maint TOTALS $ 146,000 $ 121,000 Fund Balance: 155,000 FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Prepared by: Danny Chow Phone #: (951) 244-2955 Date: March 8, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 155,000 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 185,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 340,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan $ - $ - 2 Debt Service to County - - 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, Signal Maint, Fence Maint, Landscaping, 150,000 150,000 Lighting, Signage, and Other Maint TOTALS $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Fund Balance: 190,000 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Prepared by: Danny Chow Phone #: (951) 244-2955 Date: March 8, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 190,000 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 189,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 379,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan $ - $ - 2 Debt Service to County - - 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, Signal Maint, Fence Maint, Landscaping, 200,000 200,000 Lighting, Signage, and Other Maint TOTALS $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Fund Balance: 179,000 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Canyon Lake Prepared by: Danny Chow Phone #: (951)244-2955 Date: March 8, 2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Debt Service for Measure "A" Loan $ 557,000 $ 84,000 N/A On -going loan payment on Railroad Cyn Rd 2 Debt Service to County 53,000 58,000 N/A On -going loan payment on pavement rehab 3 Railroad Canyon Road Pavement Rehab, Signal Maint, Fence Maint, Landscaping, 120,000 65,000 On-goining, annual maintenance Lighting, Signage, and Other Maint TOTALS $ 730,000 $ 207,000 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY This page left intentionally blank. L.FinGorird crw April 26, 2017 Riverside County Transportation Commission Attention: LoreIle Moe -Luna, Senior Management Analyst, Planning and Programming P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS REVENUE PROJECTIONS, MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION, and FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS (FYs 2017/18 — 2021/22 Dear Ms. Moe -Luna: The City of Cathedral City is pleased to submit documentation in support of the above referenced request. Please let me know if you need additional information. Sincerely, Bill Simons Senior Engineer 68-700 AVENIDA LALO GUERRERO • CATHEDRAL CITY, CA 92234 • 760/770-0360 • FAX: 760/202-1460 FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Cathedral City (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $391,688, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: I 24 , 2017 CITY MANAGER ATTEST: SECRETARY RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: Cathedral City Bill Simons 760.770.0360 4/25/2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: $ 963,369 1,409,000 (2,026,000) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 346,369 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 1,461,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 1,807,369 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Maintenance and Operations Pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. $ 1,499,382 $ 1,499,382 2 Measure A Administrative Costs Administration 116,880 116,880 3 McCallum Street Rehabilitation Pavement Rehabilitation 2,200,000 70,000 4 City-wide Slurry Program Peventive Maintenance 100,000 TOTALS $ 2,416,880 $ 1,686,262 FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: Cathedral City Bill Simons 760.770.0360 4/25/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 121,107 Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: 1,490,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 1,611,107 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Maintenance and Operations Pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. $ 1,536,867 $ 1,491,907 2 Measure A Administrative Costs Administration 119,200 119,200 3 Avenue 30 Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehabilitation 4,000,000 - City-wide Slurry Program Peventive Maintenance 100,000 - TOTALS $ 4,219,200 $ 1,611,107 FY 2018-19 Page 2of6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: Cathedral City Bill Simons 760.770.0360 4/25/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 0 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 1,520,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 1,520,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Maintenance and Operations Pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. $ 1,575,289 $ 1,400,800 2 Measure A Administrative Costs Administration 119,200 119,200 3 Dinah Shore/Date Palm Intersection Pavement Rehabilitation 560,000 - City-wide Slurry Program Peventive Maintenance 200,000 - TOTALS $ 879,200 $ 1,520,000 FY 2019-20 Page 3of6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: Cathedral City Bill Simons 760.770.0360 4/25/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 0 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 1,550,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 1,550,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Maintenance and Operations Pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. $ 1,614,671 $ 1,426,000 2 Measure A Administrative Costs Administration 124,000 124,000 3 City-wide Slurry Program Peventive Maintenance 300,000 - TOTALS $ 424,000 $ 1,550,000 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: Cathedral City Bill Simons 760.770.0360 4/25/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 0 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 1,581,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 1,581,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide Maintenance and Operations Pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. $ 1,655,038 $ 1,454,520 2 Measure A Administrative Costs Administration 126,480 126,480 3 City-wide Slurry Program Peventive Maintenance 300,000 - TOTALS $ 426,480 $ 1,581,000 FY 2021-22 Page 5of6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: Cathedral City Prepared by: Bill Simons Phone #: 760.770.0360 Date: 4/25/2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Citywide Maintenance and Operations Pavement and median maintenance; street light energy; transportation and traffic related planning and development activities; pavement management planning; street design and related engineering activities; and maintenance of the traffic signal system. $ 1,463,000 $ 1,463,000 6/30/2017 Ongoing 2 Cathedral Canyon Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation 444,000 195,000 11/14/2016 Complete 3 Date Palm Drive Pavemen Rehab Pavement Rehabilitation 542,000 283,000 11/14/2016 Complete 4 Vista Chino Median Construction* Safety improvements 3,700,000 - 6/9/2017 Ongoing 5 San Joaquin Sidewalk Construction Safety improvements 165,000 85,000 5/6/2016 Complete TOTALS $ 6,314,000 $ 2,026,000 *No Measure A Funds will be used on this project. Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF COACHELLA This page left intentionally blank. COAL 4o:.9104 May 23, 2017 Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street 3rd Floor PO Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: City of Coachella's Measure A Expenditure Plan FY 2017/18 — FY 2021/22 Dear Ms. Trevino: Please find enclosed the Fiscal Year 2017/18 — 2021/22 Measure A Expenditure Plan for the City of Coachella. Also enclosed are the FY 16/17 Project Status Report and the City's MOE Certification Statement for FY 17/18. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact myself Jonathan Hoy, P.E., City Engineer at jhoy cr coachella.org or Lynn Germain Igermain a,coachella.org (760) 398-5744. Thank you, onathan Hoy, .E., City Engineer City of Coachella 760-398-5744 FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Coachella (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $92,205, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: r; L l2- , 2017 MA NAGER AN AGER TY ATTEST: AN/414- eody SECRETAR RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Coachella Jonathay Hoy, P.E., City Engineer 760-398-5744 4/12/2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: $ 1,619,407 612,000 (1,292,240) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 939,167 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 602,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 1,541,167 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds (1) Installation of five new traffic signals with street repair on Van Buren & Avenue The project will improve street surface, full width of the roadway and the installation of handicap 2017-2018 52, Van Buren & Avenue 51, Avenue 50 and Frederick, Avenue 50 and Calhoun, and Avenue 49 and Van Buren ST-83 ramps as required. This project will eliminate four way stops to improve traffic flow and safety of motor vehicles $ 1,950,000 $ 400,000 14 Locations, Bike 2017-2018 (2) Caltrans ATP 2 ST-100 Lanes, Crosswalks, Pathways for Pedestrians, 2,731,000 531,000 Sidewalks, and Asphalt work. The project will improve street surface, full width of the roadway and the installation of handicap 2017-2018 (3) Street Resurfacing, Phase 13 ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the 202,000 202,000 Pavement Management Update. TOTALS $ 4,883,000 $ 1,133,000 FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Coachella Prepared by: Jonathay Hoy, P.E., City Engineer Phone #: 760-398-5744 Date: 4/12/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 408,167 Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: 614,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 1,022,167 Item No. Project Name /Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018 - 2019 (1) Street Resurfacing, Phase 14 ST- 77 The project will improve street surface, full width of the roadway and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement Management Update. $ 614,000 $ 614,000 TOTALS $ 614,000 $ 614,000 FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Coachella Prepared by: Jonathay Hoy, P.E., City Engineer Phone #: 760-398-5744 Date: 4/12/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 408,167 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 626,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 1,034,167 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 (1) Street Resurfacing, Phase 15 ST- 88 The project will improve street surface, full width of the roadway and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement Management Update. $ 626,000 $ 626,000 TOTALS $ 626,000 $ 626,000 FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Coachella Prepared by: Jonathay Hoy, P.E., City Engineer Phone #: 760-398-5744 Date: 4/12/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 408,167 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 639,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 1,047,167 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 (1) Street Resurfacing, Phase 16 The project will improve street surface, full width of the roadway and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement Management Update. $ 639,000 $ 639,000 TOTALS $ 639,000 $ 639,000 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Coachella Prepared by: Jonathay Hoy, P.E., City Engineer Phone #: 760-398-5744 Date: 4/12/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 408,167 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 652,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 1,060,167 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 (1) Street Resurfacing, Phase 17 The project will improve street surface, full width of the roadway and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement Management Update. $ 652,000 $ 652,000 TOTALS $ 652,000 $ 652,000 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Coachella Prepared by: Jonathay Hoy, P.E., City Engineer Phone #: 760-398-5744 Date: 4/12/2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Tyler Street between Avenue 54 and Avenue 53 ST-97 The project will improve street surface, full width of the roadway and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement Management Update. $ 685,000 $ 670,000 FY 17/18 Completed 2 Bridge and Northbound Indio Blvd Overcrossing ST-89 In accordance with the CVAG Agreement, the City of Coachella is responsible for a portion to be reimbursed for the construction of the Interchange. 179,600 71,240 FY 16/17 Completed 3 Avenue 52 from Harrison Street to Shady Lane ST-96 The project will improve street surface, full width of the roadway and the installation of handicap ramps as required. The street pavements are identified from the Pavement Management Update. 300,000 300,000 FY 16/17 Completed 4 Installation of five new traffic signals with street repair on Van Buren & Avenue 52, Van Buren & Avenue 51, Avenue 50 and Frederick, Avenue 50 and Calhoun, and Avenue 49 and Van Buren ST-83 The project will improve street surface, full width of the roadway and the installation of handicap ramps as required. This project will eliminate four way stops to improve traffic flow and safety of motor vehicles 1,950,000 225,000 FY 17/18 Ongoing 5 Pavement Management Program Update ST-92 This project will update the payment management system to identify future street projects 26,000 26,000 FY 16/17 Completed TOTALS $ 3,140,600 $ 1,292,240 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF CORONA This page left intentionally blank. (951) 736-2266 (951) 279-3627 (FAX) Nelson.Nelson a©ci.corona.ca.us May 3, 2017 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 400 SOUTH VICENTIA AVENUE, P.O. BOX 940, CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92879-0940 CITY HALL. - ON LINE ALL THE TIME (http:llwww.discovercorona com) LoreIle Moe -Luna, Senior Management Analyst Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 SUBJECT: MEASURE A FIVE YEAR PLAN, MOE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT, AND PROJECT STATUS REPORT Ms. Moe -Luna: The following documents are enclosed for your review: • Measure A proposed FY 2017/18 through 2021/22 Capital Improvements Plan • Maintenance of Effort (MOE) signed certification statement • Program Status Report for current Fiscal Year 2016/17 • Measure A Annual Disbursement Projects received at the City The City's minimum MOE is set at $2,208,200; however, as of June 30, 2017, the City will have spent $3,304,520 from Measure A and $25,306,207 from other funds to support Measure A project expenditures. The document supporting the MOE calculations can be found attached, entitled "FY 2016/17 Construction and Maintenance Expenditures." The Measure A proposed FY 2017/18 through 2021/22 Capital Improvement Plan will be presented to our City Council for review at the Budget Workshop on May 24, 2017 and for adoption at the regularly scheduled City Council Meeting on June 21, 2017. If you have any questions please contact Kim Sitton, Finance Manager at (951) 279-3532. Sincerely, )/7 Nelson D. Nelson, P.E. Public Works Director Attachments c: Kim Sitton, Finance Manager Theresa Daily, Financial Analyst FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Corona (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $2,208,200, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: MV1 8 , 2017 el Darrell Talbert, City Manager ATTEST City CI- rk, ity of Corona FY 2016/17 Construction and Maintenance Expenditures City of Corona Funding Breakdown Project Expenditures Included in General Ledger Total Cost General Fund Meas A Federal State City Funds Other Construction: Traffic Signal-Serfas/Rancho Corona JL70270110 $ 228,385 $ 228,385 Traffic Signal-Serfas/Rancho Corona JL70270227 $ 44,849 $ 44,849.00 Traffic Signal Construction JL70630211 $ 20,621 $ 20,621 Sidewalk/Curb/Gutter Install JL70730110 $ 46,855 $ 46,855 Sidewalk/Curb/Gutter Install JL70730222 $ 162,529 $ 162,529 Sidewalk/Curb/Gutter Install JL70730227 $ 210,626 $ 210,626 Sidewalk Improvement 15-16 JL69680227 $ 2,681 $ 2,681 Auto Center/BSNF RR Grade Separation JL71150110 P $ 254 $ 254 Auto Center/BSNF RR Grade Separation JL71150227 $ 13,295 $ 13,295 Auto Center/BSNF RR Grade Separation JL71150243 $ 145,071 $ 145,071 $ - Foothill Parkway Westerly Ext. JL86040110 1M $ 247,930 $ 247,930 Foothill PkwyJL86040211 $ 347,062 $ 347,062 Foothill Parkway Westerly Ext. JL86040222 $ 1,120 $ 1,120 Foothill Pkwy - MARA Funding JL86041227 $ 7,514,575 $ 7,514,575 Foothill Parkway Westerly Ext. JL86040243 � $ 291,070 $ 291,070 Foothill Parkway Westerly Ext. JL86040261 $ 107,880 $ 107,880 Foothill Parkway Westerly Ext. JL86040274 $ 95,417 $ 95,417 Foothill Parkway Westerly Ext. JL86040478 $ 1,335,832 $ 1,335,832 Foothill Parkway Westerly Ext. JL86040567 _ $ 224,707 $ 56,177 $ 168,530 Foothill Parkway Westerly Ext. JL86040570 $ 422,282 $ 422,282 Foothill Parkway Westerly Ext. JL86040572 $ 179,338 $ 179,338 Foothill Pkwy Easterly Improvement JL63060211 PI $ 784,627 $ 784,627 Foothill Pkwy Easterly Improvement JL63060227 $ 24,241 $ 24,241 Foothill Pkwy Easterly Improvement JL63060261 $ 305,701 $ 305,701 I-15/Caljalco Interchange Improvement JL69500110 , $ 22,001 $ 22,001 I-15/Calalco Interchange Improvement JL69500222 $ 98 $ 98 I-15/Calalco Interchange Improvement JL69500243 $ 1,497,972 $ 1,497,972 Green River Road Improvements JL61970227 $ 14,976 $ 14,976 Ontario Ave Street Improvements JL69690227 $ 6,132 $ 6,132 Overlook Street Improvement JL68330222 $ 9,875 $ 9,875 Resurfacing & Pavement Maintenance JL69220222 $ 14,179 $ 14,179 Resurfacing & Pavement Maintenance JL69220227 ' $ 175,369 $ 175,369 Striping Rehabilitation JL72920222 $ 68,715 $ 68,715 Striping Rehabilitation JL72920227 $ 129,514 $ 129,514 Pavement Rehab / Local Streets JL69210222 $ 63 $ 63 Pavement Rehab / Local Streets JL69210227 AI $ 21,656 $ 21,656 Pavement Management Study JL70690227 $ 4,062 $ 4,062 Major Pavement Rehab JL70800227 $ 33,221 $ 33,221 McKinley/Santa Fe Grade Separation JL69370222 $ 17 $ 17 McKinley/Santa Fe Grade Separation JL69370243 (RCTC) � $ 1,611 $ 1,611 Miscellaneous Repair/Replacement Traffic Signals JL70940227 $ 23,086 $ 23,086 2016 Street Pavement Project JL71980227 $ 1,785,999 $ 1,785,999 I I Annualize for months of April, May & June 2017 I. $ 5,421,434 $ 178,503 $ 814,813 $ 508,631 $ 142,737 $ - $ 3,776,751 FY 2016/17 Construction and Maintenance Expenditures City of Corona Funding Breakdown Project Expenditures Included in General Ledger Total Cost General Fund Meas A Federal State City Funds Other Maintenance: Operations Services $ - $ - Concrete Maintenance $ - Street/Dainage/Sidewalk Maintenance $ 1,571,203 $ 1,571,203 Drainage Maintenance $ - $ - Street Signs $ - Street Sweeping $ - $ - Graffiti Removal $ - $ - Fund 245 - Drainage Quality Engineering $ 509,884 $ 509,884 Street/Drainage/Sidewalk Maintenance $ 160,918 $ 160,918 Fund 446 - Street Lighting $ 667,908 $ 667,908 Signal Maintenance $ 687,005 $ 687,005 Special Projects $ - $ - Fund 252 - Lighting Cajalco Signal Operation $ 84,019 $ 84,019 Special Projects $ - $ - Street Lighting $ 27,642 $ 27,642 Fund 253-Corona N Main Traffic Signal $ 16,576 $ 16,576 Special Projects $ - $ - Street Lights $ - $ - $ - Annualize for months of April, May & June 2017 $ 1,219,141.64 $ 514,211.89 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 704,929.75 Engineering/Administrative Overhead Not Allocated to Specific Projects: Engineering Administration $ 409,686 $ 409,686 Transportation/Env Planning $ 519 $ 519 P.W. Capital Improvements $ 216,424 $ 216,424 Public Works - Special Projects $ - Drainage Quality Engineering $ 805 $ 805 Public Works Inspection-Misc $ 389,954 $ 389,954 Urban Forestry $ 247,990 $ 247,990 Annualize for months of April, May & June 2017 $ 414,123.71 $ 414,123.71 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Expenditure Totals $ 28,610,727 $ 4,488,844 $ 3,304,520 $ 2,062,779 $ 578,878 $ - $ 18,175,705 I Deductions for Special Consideration (Deductions Must Also Be Included in Project Expenditures Above): Total Project Cost General Fund State Reason Why Project Expenditure Should Be Deducted from MOE Construction: Maintenance: FY 2016/17 Construction and Maintenance Expenditures City of Corona Funding Breakdown Project Expenditures Included in General Ledger Total Cost General Fund Meas A Federal State City Funds Other Engineering/Administrative Overhead Not Allocated to Specific Projects: $ (409,686) -409,686.00 _ Deduct Totals _ $ (409,686) -409,686.00 'Total GF Expenditures $ 4,488,844 minus Deductions $ (409,686) MOE Base Year $ 2,208,200 Less, Transfers to the General Fund from Street Related Funds $ (1,010,428) Total General Fund Expenditures for Fiscal Year $ 3,068,730 Total Discretionary Funded Street Expenditures, Including Street Lighting $ 24,121,882 MOE Base Year-2009 $ 2,208,200 Agency: City of Corona Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Luis Navarro Email: luis.navarro@cLcorona.ca.us Phone No.: (951) 817-5742 Date: April25, 2017 FIVE YEAR CIP RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2016-2017 Continuing Appropriation: MARA Appropriation (Foothill Project): Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Project: $ 968,063 10,159,473 0 3,950,000 $ 15, 077, 537 MEASURE A FUNDS Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost FY 16-17 Estimated Meas A Funds Carryover FY 17-18 Measure A Funds Estimated Measure A Approp Available 1 2016 Street Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation Project Street Improvements 2,148,248 355,409 355,409 2 Alley Improvements Alley Improvements 685,338 295,557 - 295,557 3 Auto Center/Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Street Improvements 5,077,792 304,762 304,762 4 Bridge Evaluation Street Improvements 250,000 250,000 250,000 5 Changeable Traffic Message Sign Replacement Traffic Information 25,000 - 25,000 25,000 6 Chase Drive Improvements Phase III Street Improvements 868,599 400,000 400,000 7 Citywide Benchmark Streets and Storm Drains 180,000 40,000 40,000 8 Citywide GIS Master Plan Facilities, Systems and Community Assets 93,717 10,552 10,552 9 Citywide Sidewalk ADA Improvements Phase I ADA Sidewalk Improvements 1,233,152 833,152 400,000 1,233,152 10 Citywide Sidewalk ADA Improvements Phase II ADA Sidewalk Improvements 700,000 - 700,000 700,000 11 Citywide Traffic Model Update Streets and Storm Drains 225,000 150,000 75,000 225,000 12 Corona Storm Drain Line 52 Streets and Storm Drains 5,500,777 699,980 699,980 13 Foothill Parkway Easterly Improvements Street Widening 2,009,045 3,635 - 3,635 14 Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension Street Extension 18,137,239 0 - 0 15 FY2017-18 CDBG Pavement Rehabilitation Sidewalk Improvements 981,503 - 981,503 981,503 16 FY 2017-18 CDBG Sidewalk Improvement Project Sidewalk Improvements 260,000 - 260,000 260,000 17 Green River Road Improvements Street Widening 1,191,562 1,017,515 - 1,017,515 18 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Street Improvements 1,139,571 212,147 - 212,147 19 Magnolia Avenue Widening Street Widening 780,032 672,139 100,000 772,139 20 Major Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Street Improvements 1,990,417 1,589,072 - 1,589,072 21 McKinley / Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Street Improvements 5,038,251 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 22 Miscellaneous Repair and Replacement of Traffic Signals Traffic Signal 331,458 139,628 160,000 299,628 23 Ontario Avenue Street Improvements Street Improvements 1,016,658 105,689 885,000 990,689 24 Overlook Street Improvements Street Improvements 702,480 294,114 - 294,114 25 Pavement Maintenance and Resurfacing Street Improvements 642,198 63,960 200,000 263,960 26 Pavement Management Study Street Improvements 95,556 86,494 5,000 91,494 27 Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter Repair/Replacement/Maintenance Sidewalk Improvements 904,586 19,176 275,000 294,176 28 Sixth Street Revitalization Street Improvements 1,000,000 998,236 - 998,236 29 SR-91 City Betterments Streets and Storm Drains 300,000 300,000 - 300,000 30 Striping Rehabilitation Street Striping 403,571 161,759 - 161,759 31 Traffic Signals - Serfas Club Drive and Rancho Corona Road Traffic Signal 375,483 81,496 - 81,496 32 Traffic Signals Lighting Upgrade Traffic Signal 100,000 75,000 75,000 33 Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational Budget - 252,889 252,889 Totals: $ 54,387,234 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Balance: 10,159,473 $ 4,319,392 $ 14,478,865 598,671 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Corona Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Luis Navarro Email: luis.navarro@ci.corona.ca.us Phone No.: (951) 817-5742 Date: April 25, 2017 Est Es Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 598,671 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: 4,029,000 Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Project: $ 4,627,671 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Alley Improvements Alley Improvements $ 100,000 $ 100,000 2 Changeable Traffic Message Sign Replacement Traffic Information $ 25,000 $ 25,000 3 Chase Drive Improvements - Phase III Street Improvements 200,000 200,000 4 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Street Improvements 1,000,000 1,000,000 5 Magnolia Avenue Widening Street Widening 700,000 600,000 6 Major Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Street Improvements 1,000,000 1,000,000 7 Ontario Avenue Widening Street Widening 750,000 750,000 8 Overlook Street Improvements Street Improvements 50,000 50,000 9 Pavement Maintenance and Resurfacing Street Improvements 300,000 150,000 10 Pavement Management Study Street Improvements 5,000 5,000 11 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repair/Replacement/Maintenance Sidewalk Improvements 300,000 150,000 12 Striping Rehabilitation Street Striping 325,000 175,000 13 City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational Budget 260,476 260,476 Total: $ 5,015,476 $ 4,465,476 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Balance: $ 162,196 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Corona Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Luis Navarro Email: luis.navarro@ci.corona.ca.us Phone No.: (951) 817-5742 Date: April 25, 2017 Est Es Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 162,196 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 4,110,000 Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Project: $ 4,272,196 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Alley Improvements Alley Improvements $ 100,000 $ 100,000 2 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Street Improvements 1,000,000 1,000,000 3 Magnolia Avenue Widening Street Widening 700,000 600,000 4 Major Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Street Improvements 1,000,000 1,000,000 5 Overlook Street Improvements Street Improvements 50,000 50,000 6 Pavement Maintenance and Resurfacing Street Improvements 300,000 150,000 7 Pavement Management Study Street Improvements 5,000 5,000 8 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repair/Replacement/Maintenance Sidewalk Improvements 300,000 150,000 9 Striping Rehabilitation Street Striping 325,000 175,000 10 City's Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) Operational Budget 268,290 268,290 Total: $ 4,048,290 $ 3,498,290 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Balance: $ 773,906 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Corona Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Luis Navarro Email: luis.navarro@ci.corona.ca.us Phone No.: (951) 817-5742 Date: April25, 2017 Est Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 773,906 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 4,192,000 imated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Project: $ 4,965,906 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Alley Improvements Alley Improvements $ 100,000 $ 100,000 2 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Street Improvements 1,000,000 1,000,000 3 Magnolia Avenue Widening Street Widening 700,000 600,000 4 Major Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Street Improvements 1,000,000 1,000,000 5 Overlook Street Improvements Street Improvements 50,000 50,000 6 Pavement Maintenance and Resurfacing Street Improvements 300,000 150,000 7 Pavement Management Study Street Improvements 5,000 5,000 8 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repair/Replacement/Maintenance Sidewalk Improvements 300,000 150,000 9 Striping Rehabilitation Street Striping 325,000 175,000 10 Cost Allocation (Overhead) Operational Budget 276,339 276,339 Total: $ 4,056,339 $ 3,506,339 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Balance: $ 1,459,567 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Corona Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Luis Navarro Email: luis.navarro@ci.corona.ca.us Phone No.: (951) 817-5742 Date: April25, 2017 Est Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,459,567 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 4,276,000 imated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Project: $ 5,735,567 Item No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Street Improvements 1,000,000 1,000,000 2 Magnolia Avenue Widening Street Widening 700,000 600,000 3 Major Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Street Improvements 1,000,000 1,000,000 4 Pavement Maintenance and Resurfacing Street Improvements 150,000 150,000 5 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Repair/Replacement/Maintenance Sidewalk Improvements 300,000 150,000 6 Striping Rehabilitation Street Striping 325,000 175,000 7 Cost Allocation (Overhead) Operational Budget 284,629 284,629 Total: $ 2,759,629 $ 2,359,629 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Balance: $ 3,375,938 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Corona Prepared by: Luis Navarro Email: luis. na varro @ci. corona. ca. us Phone No.: (951) 817-5742 Date: April25, 2017 Project Project FYTotal FY2016-17 Estimated Item No., Project Name and Description No. Type Cost Actuals Completion Status 1 2016 Street Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation Proiect Rehabilitation of approximately 36 lane -miles of major and local streets to preserve the existing pavement, extend the useful life of the asphalt, and provide a smoother surface travel surface for motorists and pedestrians. 2 Alley Improvements Design and construction of various alley improvements Citywide to provide safe and smooth driving conditions. 3 Auto Center/Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation Construction of a grade separation (bridge) over the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad tracks at Auto Center Drive to eliminate the current at - grade crossing. 4 Bridge Evaluation Maintenance on bridges throughout the City as recommended by the State of Califomia Department of Transportation. 5 Chase Drive Improvements Phase III Installation of a storm drain swale system, and construction of sidewalk and bike path improvements on Chase Drive from Sonrisa Drive to Garretson Avenue. 6 Citywide Benchmark Update of Citywide benchmarks and adjustments to North American Datum (NAD) 83. 7 Citywide GIS Master Plan Acquisition of hardware and software, data conversion and applications development to expand the existing Geographic Information System, or GIS, for citywide implementation. 8 Citywide Sidewalk ADA Improvements Phase I Replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and drive approaches; installation of missing sidewalk, curb, gutter, access ramps, bike paths, root pruning, engineering, and incidental work; and construction, replacement, or installation of ADA-compliant facilities within the public right-of-way. 7198 6277 7115 7179 8605 6886 7103 8027 Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Facilities, Systems and Community Assets Streets and Storm Drains 2,148,248 685,338 5,077,792 250,000 868,599 180,000 93,717 833,152 1,792,839 13,295 15,382 May-17 On -going On -going On -going On -going On -going On -going On -going Complete On -going Anticipate Completion June 2017 On -going On -going On -going On -going On -going RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Corona Prepared by: Luis Navarro Email: luis. na varro @ci. corona. ca. us Phone No.: (951) 817-5742 Date: April25, 2017 Project Project FYTotal FY2016-17 Estimated Item No., Project Name and Description No. Type Cost Actuals Completion Status 9 Citywide Traffic Model Update General Plan Circulation Element update. 10 Corona Storm Drain Line 52 Construction of a 72-inch storm drain line in Joy Street from the Temescal Channel to East Grand Boulevard to East Third Street. 11 Foothill Parkway Easterly Improvements Road Improvements for Foothill Parkway from 1-15/ El Cerrito to Califomia Avenue. Construction includes installation of curb and gutter, storm drain, AC pavement, widening and medians. 12 Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension Design and construction of Foothill Parkway from Trudy Way to Paseo Grande, including full street improvements for a new four -lane roadway. 13 Green River Road Improvements Widen Green River road to four lanes between the 91 freeway and Palisades Drive. 14 Harrison Street Trunk Sewer Relocation Replace the deficient 18" sewer line with a 24" VCP sewer line within Harrison Street at Main Street. 15 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement rehabilitation for local streets in accordance with the current pavement management study. Rehabilitation may include reconstruction paving, crack sealing, slurry, etc. 16 Magnolia Avenue Widening Widening of Magnolia Avenue between El Camino Avenue and All American Way, which includes widening of the bridge that crosses the Temescal Wash. 17 Major Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement rehabilitation for major thoroughfares in accordance with the pavement management program. Rehabilitation may include reconstruction paving, crack sealing, slurry, etc. 18 McKinley / Santa Fe Railroad Grade Separation 6966 6291 6306 8604 6197 7149 6921 6241 7080 6937 Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Water Reclamation Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains 150,000 5,500,777 2,009,045 18,137,239 1,191,562 436,827 1,139, 571 680,032 1,990,417 5,038,251 25,255 7,514,575 14,976 86,665 21,673 1,571 33,221 On -going On -going On -going On -going Sep-16 Sep-16 On -going On -going On -going On -going On -going Anticipate Construction July 2017 Anticipate Completion September 2017 Anticipate Completion May 2017 Complete Complete On -going Anticipate Design September 2017 On -going Anticipate Design November 2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Corona Prepared by: Luis Navarro Email: luis.navarro@cicorona.ca.us Phone No.: (951) 817-5742 Date: April25, 2017 Project Project FY Total FY 2016-17 Estimated Item No., Project Name and Description No. Type Cost Actua/s Completion Status Construction of a new bridge over the BNSF Railroad tracks at McKinley to eliminate the current at -grade crossing. 19 Miscellaneous Repair and Replacement of Traffic Signals Unscheduled repair/replacement of traffic signals and related facilities at various locations Citywide. Includes the repair or replacement of traffic signals, safety lights, street name signs, traffic control signs, signal poles, heads, etc.; rewiring old signals and damaged loops; and maintenance of the advance traffic management system. 20 Ontario Avenue Street Improvements Cold in place recycling (CIR) of existing pavement along Ontario Avenue between California Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. 21 Overlook Street Improvements Pavement rehabilitation for various roads in the Overlook area over several years. 22 Pavement Maintenance and Resurfacing Resurface and repair potholes and miscellaneous pavement failures with City staff and/or contracted services. 23 Pavement Management Study Ongoing field survey of local streets to be included in the Street Saver Program for the purpose of completing the City's street inventory, and maintaining current information for rehabilitation project planning. Annual Street Saver license and maintenance. 24 Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter Repair/Replacement/Maintenance Street maintenance program for as -needed repairs or replacement of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and drive approaches. 25 Sixth Street Revitalization Reconfiguration and rehabilitation of West Sixth Street from Main Street to Merrill Street for the purpose of widening and improving existing sidewalks to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Project also involves the modification of curb ramps to meet ADA standards, and introduces angled parking for easier access to local business. 7094 6969 6833 6922 7069 7073 7178 Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains 171,458 131,658 702,480 442,198 90,556 629,586 1,000,000 24,454 8,986 3,585 208,333 4,062 307,619 1,764 On -going On -going On -going On -going On -going On -going On -going On -going Anticipate Construction September 2017 On -going On -going On -going On -going On -going RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016 - 2017 Agency: City of Corona Prepared by: Luis Navarro Email: luis.navarro@cicorona.ca.us Phone No.: (951) 817-5742 Date: April25, 2017 Project Project FY Total FY 2016-17 Estimated Item No., Project Name and Description No. Type Cost Actua/s Completion Status 26 SR-91 City Betterments In conjunction with the SR-91 Capital Improvement Project, the City will fund improvements to various local streets beyond the requirements for the SR-91 Project. 27 Striping Rehabilitation Upgrade and maintenance of Citywide striping using City staff and/or contract services; and rehabilitation and maintenance of the City's traffic system and transportation infrastructure. 28 Traffic Signals - Serfas Club Drive and Rancho Corona Road Installation of a developer -paid traffic signal at the intersection of Serfas Club Drive and Rancho Corona Road. 29 Traffic Signals Lighting Upgrade Upgrade traffic signal safety lighting and Internally Illuminated Street Name Signs (IISNS) to energy efficient, long-lasting, lighting fixtures to reduce energy usage and maintain costs. Upgrades will be phased over a 3-year period. Cost Allocation Plan (Overhead) 6967 7292 7027 7183 Operational Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains Streets and Storm Drains 300,000 403,571 375,483 100,000 141,812 46,908 252,889 On -going On -going On -going On -going On -going On -going On -going Anticipate Completion June 2017 On -going On -going TOTAL $ 50,757,558 $ 10,519,864 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS This page left intentionally blank. City of Desert Hot Springs 65-950 Pierson Blvd. • Desert Hot Springs • CA • 92240 (760) 329-6411 www.cityofdhs.org June 7, 2017 Shirley Medina Programming and Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 RE: City of Desert Hot Spring Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2017/18-2021/22 and Maintenance of Effort Dear Ms Medina, Attached is the City of Desert Hot Springs' Measure "A" Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (C1P) 2017-2022, a Project Status Report for our FY 2016/17 and the City's Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 329-6411 Ext. 234 Sincerely, Daniel Porras Community Development Director Attachments: Measure "A" Five Year (CIP) FY 2017-2026 Project Status Report FY 2016/17 CIP Maintenance of Effort Certification Cc: Finance Department Engineering FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Desert Hot Springs (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $75,147, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 0_4 -4- 12017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 1 of 6 Prepared by: Daniel Porras Phone #: 760-329-6411 Ext 216 Date: June 7, 2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 5,194 472,000 (443,000) $ 34,194 466,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 500,194 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide resurfacing, curb, gutter, and sidewalk repairs and improvements amnd signage and striping Road Rehabilitation and Maintenance $ 200,000 $ 15,000 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP'x (Certificate of Participation) Debt Service 398,000 200,000 3 Palm Drive Traffic Signal Improvements and Street Lighting Construction -Traffic Signals ad Street Li 9th ng 2,000,000 50,000 4 Indian Avenue Rehabilitaiion and Widening - From Interstate 10 to Dillon Rd Construction -Road Rehabili ideninn and 9 200,000 50,000 7 Palm Drive Median Improvements - From Two Bunch Plams Trail to Pierson Blvd Construction - Median Improvements 350,000 150,000 5 Indirect Costs Overhead 30,000 30,000 TOTALS $ 3,178,000 $ 495,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page of 2 of 6 Prepared by: Daniel Porras Phone #: 760-329-6411 Ext 216 Date: June 7, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 5,194 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: 475,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 480,194 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide resurfacing, curb, gutter & sidewalk repairs and Improvements and signage and striping Road Rehabilitation and Maintenance $ 630,000 $ 38,000 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP'x (Certificate of Participation) Debt Service 401,000 200,000 3 Palm Drive Traffic Signal Improvements and Street Lighting Construction -Road Rehabilitation and Widening 3,000,000 100,000 4 Indian Avenue Rehabilitaiion and Widening - From Interstate 10 to Dillon Rd Road Rehabilitation and Widening 200,000 100,000 5 Indirect Costs Overhead 37,000 37,000 TOTALS $ 4,268,000 $ 475,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Daniel Porras Phone #: 760-329-6411 Ext 216 Date: June 7, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 5,194 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 485,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 490,194 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide resurfacing, curb, gutter & sidewalk repairs and Improvements and signage and striping Road Rehabilitation and Maintenance $ 750,000 $ 245,000 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP'x (Certificate of Participation) Debt Service 402,000 200,000 3 Indirect Costs Overhead 38,000 38,000 TOTALS $ 1,190,000 $ 483,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Daniel Porras Phone #: 760-329-6411 Ext 216 Date: June 7, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 7,194 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 495,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 502,194 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide resurfacing, curb, gutter & sidewalk repairs and Improvements and signage and striping Road Rehabilitation and Maintenance $ 800,000 $ 250,000 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP'x (Certificate of Participation) Debt Service 403,000 200,000 3 Indirect Costs Overhead 39,000 39,000 TOTALS $ 1,242,000 $ 489,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Daniel Porras Phone #: 760-329-6411 Ext 216 Date: June 7, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 13,194 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 505,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 518,194 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Citywide resurfacing, curb, gutter & sidewalk repairs and Improvements and signage and striping Road Rehabilitation and Maintenance $ 700,000 $ 260,000 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP'x (Certificate of Participation) Debt Service 403,000 200,000 3 Indirect Costs Overhead 40,000 40,000 TOTALS $ 1,143,000 $ 500,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Desert Hot Springs Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Daniel Porras Phone #: 760-329-6411 Ext 216 Date: June 7, 2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Citywide resurfacing, curb, gutter, and sidewalk repairs and improvements amnd signage and striping Maintenance $ 1,225,000 $ 115,000 6/30/2017 to be completed 2 Debt Service for T.R.I.P. (Total Road Improvement Program Services 2012A COP'x (Certificate of Participation) Debt Service 398,000 200,000 on -going to be completed 3 Jefferson/I-10 and Date Palm/I-10 Interchange Reimbursement 46,000 46,000 6/30/2017 to be completed 4 Indian Avenue Construction 200,000 - on -going 5 STP Slurry Project Hacienda Mission Lakes Surfacing 370,000 3,000 8/30/2016 6 SB821 -Cabot Yerxa Sidewalk Project Construction 260,000 40,000 6/30/2017 to be completed 7 Indirect Costs Overhead 39,000 39,000 on -going TOTALS $ 2,538,000 $ 443,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF EASTVALE This page left intentionally blank. City of Eastvale 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite #910 • Eastvale, CA 91752 (951) 361-0900 • Fax: (951) 361-0888 • www.EastvaleCA.gov May 15, 2017 Mrs. LoreIle Moe -Luna Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: City of Eastvale's Measure A Expenditure Plan FY 2017/18 — FY 2021/22 Dear Ms. Moe -Luna: Please find enclosed the Fiscal Year 2017/18 — 2021/22 Measure A Expenditure Plan for the City of Eastvale. Also enclosed is the FY16117 Project Status Report and the City's MOE Certification Statement for FY17/18. Per the Measure A ordinance, Measure A carryover balance in excess of three times the annual allocation to the agency will require justification for the carryover. Currently, the City's carryover balance from FY16117 is anticipated to be $4.7M, which is approximately four times the annual allocation, based on the average of $1.2Mlyear. The following reasons are provided for the carryover: • The City's CIP includes 4 projects that will resurface/overlay Hamner AvelMiliken Ave; major arterials streets in the City. Projects will be funded with $1.3M Measure A funds. During the design phase, the City became aware of a water main project installation along Hamner Ave which was planned for construction in 2015/2016 by Jurupa Community Services District. To minimize any conflicts in construction with the District and cutting into newly paved streets, the City delayed the final design and construction of the four projects. The water main installation is now complete and the City plans to advertise the four projects together by end of May 2017 with construction completed by Fall 2017. • The City's ClP includes an annual program that provides pavement maintenance treatments on residential streets. Funds of $1.1 M Measure A funds have been programmed in FY15116 and FY16/17, The delays in project delivery have been mostly contributed to weather conditions due to rain which affects field assessment and construction. Project construction was planned for late Spring 2017, however, this will be delayed due to the longer wet season this year. The type of treatment programed is ideal for weather conditions in Spring or early Fall, when pavement has been dry for several months and temperatures do not exceed 100 F. Since we will miss the late Spring window, the City plans to advertise the project in late June 2017 with construction completed by November 2017. " The City's Measure A FY17118 Program reflects approximately $3M to be expended, $2.4M to be used directly for construction by the end of the 2017 calendar year from the projects listed above. The forecasted carryover to FY18119 is approximately $3M. The City is confident that projects programmed in FY17118 projects will be completed in the time frames noted above. Should you have any questions or need further information on the above, please feel free to contact Ann Herner at aherner@interwestgrp.com or myself at jindrawan@eastvaleca.gov at (951) 703-4473. Sincerely, Joe Indrawan City Engineer Contract Services Provided by Interwest Consulting Group Enclosures FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Eastvale (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $38,949, approved by the Commission at its July 8, 2015 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. S ; 2017 � • / 7.��' /M16HELE NISSEN/CITY MANAGE ATTEST: STEVEN AGUI�AR, ASSISTANT CITY CLERK RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Eastvale Prepared by: Joe Indrawan, City Engineer Phone #: (951) 703-4473 Date: May 12, 2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 3,689,084 FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: 1,183,000 FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: (141,640) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 4,730,444 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 1,255,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 5,985,444 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 197,108 $ 33,410 2 Citywide Street Improvement Program Repair or reconstruct roadways as needed. 1,831,000 1,681,960 3 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects. 1,285,000 1,283,500 TOTALS $ 3,313,108 $ 2,998,870 FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Eastvale Prepared by: Joe Indrawan, City Engineer Phone #: (951) 703-4473 Date: May 12, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 2,986,574 Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: 1,280,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 4,266,574 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 20,000 $ 20,000 2 Citywide Street Improvement Program Repair or reconstruct roadways as needed. 2,600,000 2,600,000 3 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects. 590,000 590,000 TOTALS $ 3,210,000 $ 3,210,000 FY 2018-19 Page 2of6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Eastvale Prepared by: Joe Indrawan, City Engineer Phone #: (951) 703-4473 Date: May 12, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,056,574 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 1,306,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 2,362,574 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 20,000 $ 20,000 2 Citywide Street Improvement Program Repair or reconstruct roadways as needed. 600,000 600,000 3 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects. 560,000 560,000 TOTALS $ 1,180,000 $ 1,180,000 FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Eastvale Prepared by: Joe Indrawan, City Engineer Phone #: (951) 703-4473 Date: May 12, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,182,574 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 1,332,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 2,514,574 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 20,000 $ 20,000 2 Citywide Street Improvement Program Repair or reconstruct roadways as needed. 600,000 600,000 3 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects. 560,000 560,000 TOTALS $ 1,180,000 $ 1,180,000 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Eastvale Prepared by: Joe Indrawan, City Engineer Phone #: (951) 703-4473 Date: May 12, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,334,574 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 1,359,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 2,693,574 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 20,000 $ 20,000 2 Citywide Street Improvement Program Repair or reconstruct roadways as needed. 600,000 600,000 3 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects. 560,000 560,000 TOTALS $ 1,180,000 $ 1,180,000 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Eastvale Prepared by: Joe Indrawan, City Engineer Phone #: (951) 703-4473 Date: May 12, 2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Date Status 1 Road Safety/Traffic Improvements Remove, replace, install signs, pavement markings, related roadway safety and traffic improvements; traffic signal synchronization. $ 233,000 $ 79,630 3/1/2017 This includes an annual program and specific projects. Unexpended costs are carried over to next FY. 2 Street Improvement Program Widen, repair, or reconstruct roadways as needed. 2,460,333 26,504 6/30/2017 This includes an annual program and specific projects. Unexpended costs are carried over to next FY. 3 Citywide Maintenance Program Right-of-way maintenance and repair to include but not limited to: striping, stenciling; repairs to streets and culvert/drainage facilities; storm damage/flood control projects. 1,185,000 35,506 6/30/2017 This includes an annual program and specific projects Unexpended costs are carried over to next FY. TOTALS $ 3,878,333 $ 141,640 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 This page left intentionally blank. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF HEMET This page left intentionally blank. City of Hemet Department of Engineering .051) 765-2360 .510 E. Florida Ave. Hemet, CA 92543 May 3, 2017 Lorelle Moe -Luna Senior Management Analyst Planning and Programming RCTC P.Q. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: Measure A Annual Update and 5 Year GIP Projection Dear Ms. Moe -Luna: Please find the enclosed FY 2017/18 Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement and 5-year CIP Project Status Report for Measure A funding purposes. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (951) 765-2362 Monday through Thursday from 8:00a.m. to 5:00p.m. Sincerely, erek Wieske Engineering Director/City Engineer Enclosure: FY 2017/18 Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement Project Status Report From the Office of the CITY MANAGER Alexander P. Meyerhoff 445 E. FLORIDA AVE • HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92543 • (951)765-2301 FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Hemet (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $18,924, approved by the Commission at its October 12, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 51/4-7! , 2017 Alexander'P. Meyerhr , AICP CITY MANAGER ATTEST: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Hemet Nino Abad, P.E. 951-765-3847 2-May-17 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: $ 4,347,727 1,677,000 (679,645) *Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 5,345,082 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 1,656,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 7,001,082 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 FY 17/18 Pavement Rehab (includes all prior year Pavement Rehab balance minus $1.069,552 moved to Gilbert St Pavement Maintenance & Improvements $ 3,781,975 $ 3,781,975 Rehab 2 Pavement Management Program (Maintenance) Software/data maintenance 50,000 50,000 3 Gilbert Street Rehab (continued from Pavement Maintenance 1,661,420 1,218,141 FY16/17 and includes $1,069,552 Reconstruction transferred from 15/16 year pavement rehab) TOTALS $ 5,493,395 $ 5,050,116 'Fund Balance is higher than normal due to delays with the Gilbert Street Rehab project and updates to the Pavement Management Program (data collection), which will both be moving forward in FY17/18, thereby, reducing the fund balance to normal levels. FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Hemet Prepared by: Nino Abad, P.E. Phone #: 951-765-3847 Date: 2-May-17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,950,966 Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: 1,689,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 3,639,966 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018 - 2019 1 FY 18/19 Pavement Rehab Pavement Maintenance $ 2,089,000 $ 2,089,000 & Improvements 2 Pavement Management Program (Maintenance and biannual field survey) Software/data maintenance and field survey 100,000 100,000 TOTALS $ 2,189,000 $ 2,189,000 FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Hemet Prepared by: Nino Abad, P.E. Phone #: 951-765-3847 Date: 2-May-17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,450,966 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 1,723,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 3,173,966 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 FY 18/19 Pavement Rehab Pavement Maintenance $ 2,173,000 $ 2,173,000 & Improvements 2 Pavement Management Program (Maintenance) Software/data maintenance 50,000 50,000 TOTALS $ 2,223,000 $ 2,223,000 FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Hemet Prepared by: Nino Abad, P.E. Phone #: 951-765-3847 Date: 2-May-17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 950,966 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 1,757,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 2,707,966 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 FY 18/19 Pavement Rehab Pavement Maintenance $ 2,157,000 $ 2,157,000 & Improvements 2 Pavement Management Program (Maintenance and bianual field survey) Software/data maintenance and field survey 100,000 100,000 TOTALS $ 2,257,000 $ 2,257,000 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Hemet Prepared by: Nino Abad, P.E. Phone #: 951-765-3847 Date: 2-May-17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 450,966 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 1,792,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 2,242,966 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 1 FY 18/19 Pavement Rehab Pavement Maintenance $ 2,192,966 $ 2,192,966 & Improvements 2 Pavement Management Program (Maintenance) Software/data maintenance 50,000 50,000 TOTALS $ 2,242,966 $ 2,242,966 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Hemet Prepared by: Nino Abad, P.E. Phone #: 951-765-3847 Date: 2-May-17 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 15/16 Pavement Rehab Pavement Maint $ 629,645 $ 629,645 On -going On -going 2 Gilbert Street Rehab Pavement Maint 1,661,420 - Summer 2017 E76 for Construction received 4/10/17 3 16/17 Pavement Rehab Pavement Maint 5,781,975 50,000 Summer 2018 On -going TOTALS $ 8,073,040 $ 679,645 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF INDIAN WELLS This page left intentionally blank. INDIAN WELLS r=ALIFORNIA April 24, 2017 Riverside County Transportation Commission Attn: LoreIle Moe -Luna 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: Measure "A": Local Streets and Roads Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan and Status Update Dear Ms. Moe -Luna: Attached is the City of Indian Wells Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Five - Year Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2017/18-2021/22. Sincerely, Ken Seumalo, P.E. Public Works Director cc: Finance Director 94-950 Eldorado Drive — Indian Wells, California 92210-7497 — V (760) 346 2489 F (760) 346 0407 .i - ., (Hill FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Indian Wells (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $963,640, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 4- (0- 51 12017 - watt'. r.f CITY MANAGER ATTES RETAR RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Indian Wells Prepared by: Ken Seumalo, P.E., Public Works Director Phone #: (760) 776-0237 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 35,716 Date: 4/24/2017 FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: 267,000 FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: (245,000) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 57,716 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 232,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 289,716 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 Indian Wells Village UG Utility Rule 20B 1 Slurry Street Improvement $ 100,000 $ - 2 Annual Crack Seal & Slurry Seal Street Improvement 450,000 - 3 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585,000 289,716 TOTALS $ 1,135,000 $ 289,716 FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Indian Wells Prepared by: Ken Seumalo, P.E., Public Works Director Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: 4/24/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: 237,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 237,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018 - 2019 1 Eldorado Drive Overlay Street Improvement $ 30,000 $ - 2 Sidewalk South Side Fred Waring Dr. Street Improvement 30,000 - 3 Club Drive Overlay Street Improvement 40,000 - 4 Cook Street Overlay Street Improvement 50,000 - 5 Annual Crack Seal & Slurry Seal Street Improvement 375,000 - 6 Miles Avenue Overlay Street Improvement 400,000 - 7 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585,000 237,000 TOTALS $ 1,510,000 $ 237,000 FY 2018-19 Page 2of6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Indian Wells Prepared by: Ken Seumalo, P.E., Public Works Director Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: 4/24/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 242,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 242,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Sidewalk South Side Fred Waring Dr. Street Improvement $ 100,000 $ - 2 Eldorado Drive Overlay Street Improvement 250,000 - 3 Club Drive Overlay Street Improvement 395,000 - 4 Annual Crack Seal & Slurry Seal Street Improvement 400,000 - 5 Cook Street Overlay Street Improvement 465,000 - 6 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585,000 242,000 TOTALS $ 2,195,000 $ 242,000 FY 2019-20 Page 3of6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Indian Wells Prepared by: Ken Seumalo, P.E., Public Works Director Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: 4/24/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 247,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 247,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Manitou Drive Landscape Renovation Street Improvement $ 35,000 $ - 2 Fairway Drive Overlay Street Improvement 50,000 - 3 Fred Waring Drive Repair & Overlay Street Improvement 120,000 - 4 Annual Crack Seal & Slurry Seal Street Improvement 250,000 - 5 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585,000 247,000 TOTALS $ 1,040,000 $ 247,000 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Indian Wells Prepared by: Ken Seumalo, P.E., Public Works Director Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: 4/24/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 252,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 252,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 1 Manitou Drive Landscape Renovation Street Improvement $ 150,000 $ - 2 Fairway Drive Overlay Street Improvement 400,000 - 3 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement 585,000 252,000 4 Fred Waring Drive Repair & Overlay Street Improvement 1,200,000 - TOTALS $ 2,335,000 $ 252,000 FY 2021-22 Page 5of6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Indian Wells Prepared by: Ken Seumalo, P.E., Public Works Director Phone #: (760) 776-0237 Date: 4/24/2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Citywide Parkways Street Improvement $ 585,000 $ 245,000 6/30/2017 Ongoing TOTALS $ 585,000 $ 245,000 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF INDIO This page left intentionally blank. May 3, 2017 Ms. LoreIle Moe -Luna Senior Management Analyst, Planning and Programming Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: Five Year Measure A Capital Improvement Plan (FY17/18 — FY21/22) Dear Ms. Moe -Luna: Enclosed is the City of Indio's submittal of the Five Year Measure A Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 17/18 to 21/22 to the Riverside County Transportation Commission for review and approval. The City's Maintenance of Effort certification is also enclosed, as well as a status report for projects utilizing Measure A funds in Fiscal Year 2016-2017. !7 you have any questions, please call me at (760) 391-4017. Sincerely, c ,�v�. Timothy T. Wassil, PE, PMP, CCM Public Works Director cc: Juan Raya, PE City Engineer Brian Kinder, Accountant p: 760.391.4000 • f: 760.391.4008 • 100 Civic Center Mall Indio, CA 92201 www.INDIO.org FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Indio (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $2,048,564, approved by the Commission at its July 11, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: February 22, 2017 Dom. CITY MANAGER/ part pAa,r• ATTEST: - r I SEC E A Y� � id• YSi Wno (-lL4- 0.4-.--9f) CITY OF INDIO MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT FYE 6/30/17 FUND DEPT ACCOUNT/DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURES 101 4411 Engineering Services 1,786,487 101 4341 Street Maintenance 3,319,303 TOTAL EXPENDITURES -UNAUDITED ESTIMATED $5,105,790 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT FOR YEAR ENDING 6/30/17 APPROVED BY: $5,105,790 ROB ROCKWELL, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER & FINANCE DIRECTOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Indio Prepared by: Juan Raya Phone #: 760-391-4017 Date: April 17, 2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 1,055 FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: 1,809 FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: (1,881) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 983 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 2,849 1,866 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 1 Indio Blvd. Bridge NB @ Storm Channel Seismic Retrofit Seismic Retrofit $ 3,047 $ 6 2 Jackson St. Bridge @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Seismic Retrofit 2,452 5 3 Indio Blvd. Bridges over UPRR (railroad) Seismic Retrofit 25,150 25 4 Indio Blvd. Bridge SB @ Storm Channel - Scour Protection Scour Protection 439 20 5 Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash New Bridge Construction 19,000 25 6 Shields Road Connection (south of Hwy 111) Roadway Connection 659 10 7 Hwy 111 Improvements (Madison St. Rubidoux Roadway Improvement 14,345 100 8 Hwy 111 Improvements (Hwy 111 - Ave 48) Roadway Improvement 2,928 25 9 Hwy 111 Median and Landscaping Roadway Improvement 500 20 10 North Indio Pavement Improvements Roadway Improvement 1,828 73 11 Grant Applications for Transportation Projects Various 50 45 12 Jackson St./Monroe St. @ 1-10 Fwy Interchanges Freeway Interchange Improvement 8,080 45 13 Madison Canal Improvements (Ave 50 - Ave 52), Ph. 2 Roadway Improvement 3,219 28 14 Madison Street Improvements (Ave 50 - Ave 52), Ph. 2 Roadway Improvement 8,950 60 15 Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies (List A) Roadway Improvement 650 580 16 City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program Roadway Improvement 4,570 128 17 1-10 @ Jefferson Street Interchange Project Freeway Interchange Improvement 85,800 6 18 Andrew Jackson Elementary Pedestrian Active Transportation/ADA 2,620 10 Improvements Improvement 79 Jackson Street Signal Upgrades & Synchronization Traffic Signal 3,292 184 20 Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements Signal/Signage 50 40 21 Avenue 42 and Gore Street Traffic Signal New Traffic Signal 293 20 22 Doctor Carreon Boulevard and Oasis Street Traffic Signal Modification Traffic Signal Modification 125 6 Monroe Street Signal Modification and 23 Interconnect from Oleander Avenue to Comet Traffic Signal 461 6 Lane 24 Safe Routes to School Master Plan Master Plan 205 10 25 Avenue 44 Road Diet Roadway Improvement 500 100 26 Pedestrian Countdown Timers Traffic Signal 300 50 27 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program New Maintenance Bridge Program 7,690 100 28 Complete Streets Plan Master Plan 400 10 29 Measure "A" Advance Debt Repayment Roadway Improvement 673 673 30 Salaries & Benefits for PW Employees Project Management & Maintenance 510 105 31 Indio Internal Services Percentage of Salaries & Benefits 85 44 TOTALS $ 198,871 $ 2,559 FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Indio Prepared by: Juan Raya Phone #: 760-391-4017 Date: April 17, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 290 1,903 2,193 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2018 - 2019 1 Indio Blvd. Bridge NB @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Seismic Retrofit $ 3,047 $ 10 2 Jackson St. Bridge @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Seismic Retrofit 2,452 5 3 Indio Blvd. Bridges over UPRR (railroad) Seismic Retrofit 25,150 5 4 Indio Blvd. Bridge SB @ Storm Channel - Scour Protection Scour Protection 439 10 5 Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash New Bridge Construction 19,000 25 6 Shields Road Connection (south of Hwy 111) Roadway Connection 659 5 7 Hwy 111 Improvements (Madison St. - Rubidoux St.) Roadway Improvement 14,345 5 8 Hwy 111 Improvements (Hwy 111 - Ave 48) Roadway Improvement 2,928 75 9 Hwy 111 Median and Landscaping Roadway Improvement 500 20 10 North Indio Pavement Improvements Roadway Improvement 1,828 73 11 Grant Applications for Transportation Projects Various 50 45 12 Jackson St./Monroe St. @ 1-10 Fwy Interchanges Freeway Interchange Improvement 8,080 10 13 Madison Street Improvements (Ave 50 - Ave 52), Ph. 2 Roadway Improvement 8,950 10 14 Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies (List A) Roadway Improvement 650 580 15 City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program Roadway Improvement 4,570 128 16 1-10 @ Jefferson Street Interchange Project Freeway Interchange Improvement 85,800 6 17 Andrew Jackson Elementary Pedestrian Active Transportation/ADA 2,620 5 Improvements Improvement 18 Jackson Street Signal Upgrades & Synchronization Traffic Signal 3,292 5 19 Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements Signal/Signage 50 40 20 Safe Routes to School Master Plan Master Plan 205 10 21 Avenue 44 Road Diet Roadway Improvement 500 50 22 Pedestrian Countdown Timers Traffic Signal 300 25 23 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program New Maintenance Bridge Program 7,690 100 24 Complete Streets Plan Master Plan 400 10 25 Measure "A" Advance Debt Repayment Roadway Improvement 673 673 26 Salaries & Benefits for PW Employees Project Management & Maintenance 510 110 27 Indio Internal Services Percentage of Salaries & Benefits 85 42 TOTALS $ 194,773 $ 2,082 FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Indio Prepared by: Juan Raya Phone #: 760-391-4017 Date: April 17, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 111 1,941 2,052 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2019-2020 1 Indio Blvd. Bridge NB @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Seismic Retrofit $ 3,047 $ 5 2 Jackson St. Bridge @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Seismic Retrofit 2,452 5 3 Indio Blvd. Bridges over UPRR (railroad) Seismic Retrofit 25,150 5 4 Indio Blvd. Bridge SB @ Storm Channel - Scour Protection Scour Protection 439 5 5 Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash New Bridge Construction 19,000 5 6 Hwy 111 Improvements (Hwy 111 - Ave 48) Roadway Improvement 2,928 100 7 Grant Applications for Transportation Projects Various 50 45 8 Jackson St./Monroe St. @ I-10 Fwy Interchanges Freeway Interchange Improvement 8,080 10 9 Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies (List A) Roadway Improvement 650 580 10 City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program Roadway Improvement 4,570 128 11 Andrew Jackson Elementary Pedestrian Active Transportation/ADA 2,620 5 Improvements Improvement 12 Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements Signal/Signage 50 40 13 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program New Maintenance Bridge Program 7,690 75 14 Measure "A" Advance Debt Repayment Roadway Improvement 673 673 15 Salaries & Benefits for PW Employees Project Management & Maintenance 510 110 16 Indio Internal Services Percentage of Salaries & Benefits 85 45 TOTALS $ 77,994 $ 1,836 FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Indio Prepared by: Juan Raya Phone #: 760-391-4017 Date: April 17, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 216 1,980 2,196 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2020-2021 1 Indio Blvd. Bridge NB @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Seismic Retrofit $ 3,047 $ 5 2 Jackson St. Bridge @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Seismic Retrofit 2,452 5 3 Indio Blvd. Bridge SB @ Storm Channel - Scour Protection Scour Protection 439 5 4 Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash New Bridge Construction 19,000 5 5 Grant Applications for Transportation Projects Various 50 45 6 Jackson St./Monroe St. @ I-10 Fwy Interchanges Freeway Interchange Improvement 8,080 10 7 Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies (List A) Roadway Improvement 650 580 8 City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program Roadway Improvement 4,570 128 9 Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements Signal/Signage 50 40 10 Measure "A" Advance Debt Repayment Roadway Improvement 673 673 11 Salaries & Benefits for PW Employees Project Management & Maintenance 510 110 12 Indio Internal Services Percentage of Salaries & Benefits 85 48 TOTALS $ 39,606 $ 1,654 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Indio Prepared by: Juan Raya Phone #: 760-391-4017 Date: April 17, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 542 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 2,020 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 2,562 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2021-2022 1 Indio Blvd. Bridge NB @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Seismic Retrofit $ 3,047 $ 5 2 Jackson St. Bridge @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Seismic Retrofit 2,452 5 3 Indio Blvd. Bridge SB @ Storm Channel - Scour Protection Scour Protection 439 5 4 Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash New Bridge Construction 19,000 5 5 Grant Applications for Transportation Projects Various 50 45 6 Jackson St./Monroe St. @ I-10 Fwy Interchanges Freeway Interchange Improvement 8,080 10 Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies (List A) Roadway Improvement 650 580 8 City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program Roadway Improvement 4,570 128 9 Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements Signal/Signage 50 40 10 Measure "A" Advance Debt Repayment Roadway Improvement 673 673 11 Salaries & Benefits for PW Employees Project Management & Maintenance 510 120 12 Indio Internal Services Percentage of Salaries & Benefits 85 42 TOTALS $ 39,606 $ 1,658 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Indio Prepared by: Juan Raya Phone #: 760-391-4017 Date: April 17, 2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Indio Blvd. Bridge NB @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Seismic Retrofit $ 3,047 $ 6 06/2020 Design, Construction (Spring of 2018) 2 Jackson St. Bridge @ Storm Channel - Seismic Retrofit Seismic Retrofit 2,452 2 06/2020 Design, Construction (Spring of 2018) 3 Indio Blvd. Bridges over UPRR (railroad) Seismic Retrofit 25,150 25 06/2018 Design/Construction 4 Indio Blvd. Bridge SB @ Storm Channel - Scour Protection Scour Protection 439 3 06/2020 Construction Pending 'Indio Blvd. NB @ Storm Channel - Retrofit' 5 Avenue 44 Bridge at the Wash New Bridge Construction 19,000 23 06/2020 Design 6 Shields Road Connection (south of Hwy 111) Roadway Connection 659 11 06/2018 Design 7 Hwy 111 Improvements (Madison St. - Rubidoux St.) Roadway Improvement 14,345 24 06/2018 Design, Construction (Summer of 2017) 8 Hwy 111 Median and Landscaping Roadway Improvement 500 1 12/2017 Design/Construction (Summer of 2017) 9 North Indio Pavement Improvements Roadway Improvement 1,828 72 08/2018 Design 10 Grant Applications for Transportation Projects Various 50 9 On -Going On -Going 11 Jackson St./Monroe St. @ 1-10 Fwy Interchanges Freeway Interchange Improvement 8,080 43 06/2020 Design 12 Madison Canal Improvements (Madison & Ave 50), Ph. 2 Roadway Improvement 3,219 325 08/2017 Completed 13 Madison Street Improvements (Ave 50 - Ave 52), Ph. 2 Roadway Improvement 8,950 104 06/2019 Design (pending IID Issues) 14 Annual Street Maintenance Contracts/Supplies (List A) Roadway Improvement 650 150 On -Going On -Going 15 City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Program Roadway Improvement 4,570 80 On -Going On -Going 16 1-10 @ Jefferson Street Interchange Project Freeway Interchange Improvement 85,800 6 06/2018 Construction 17 Andrew Jackson Elementary Pedestrian Improvements Active Transportation/ADA Improvement 2,620 12 06/2019 Construction 18 Jackson Street Signal Upgrades & Synchronization Traffic Signal 3,292 28 06/2018 Construction 19 Misc. Traffic Safety Improvements Signal/Signage 50 40 On -Going On -Going 20 Jefferson St & Dunbar Ct Traffic Signal New Traffic Signal 311 66 06/2017 Completed 21 Avenue 42 and Gore Street Traffic Signal New Traffic Signal 293 20 11/2017 Construction 22 Doctor Carreon Boulevard and Oasis Street Traffic Signal Modification Traffic Signal Modification 125 6 04/2018 Design 23 Monroe Street Signal Modification and Interconnect from Oleander Avenue to Comet Lane Traffic Signal Modification 461 6 04/2018 Design 24 Safe Routes to School Master Plan Master Plan 205 2 11/2018 Design 25 Measure "A" Advance Debt Repayment Roadway Improvement 673 673 On -Going Payment 26 Salaries & Benefits for PW Employees Project Management & Maintenance 510 100 On -Going Project Management & Maintenance 27 Indio Internal Services Percentage of Salaries & Benefits 85 44 On -Going Percentage of Salaries & Benefits TOTAL $ 187,364 $ 1,881 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 This page left intentionally blank. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY This page left intentionally blank. CiofjurupaValley Verne Lauritzen, Mayor . Micheal Goodland, Mayor Pro Tem . Brian Berkson, Council Member . Anthony Kelly, Jr., Council Member . Laura Roughton, Council Member May 18, 2017 Attn: Lorelle Moe -Luna, Senior Management Analyst Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon St, 3th Floor Riverside CA 92502 Subject: RCTC MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS REVENUE PROJECTIONS, MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION, AND JURUPA VALLEY FIVE - YEAR MEASURE A 2017/18 to 2021/22 CIP Dear Ms. Alvarez, The City Council of the City of Jurupa Valley, at its regular meeting on May 18, 2017, adopted the City's Five Year Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2017/18-2021/22. Included with this letter are the following documents: • Five-year Jurupa Valley CIP for Fiscal Years 2017/18-2021/22 • Measure "A" Local Funds Program Project Status Report for Fiscal Year 2016/17 • MOE Certification Statement The City requests that the Riverside County Transportation Commission accept and approve the City's Measure "A" Five -Year CIP and find the City eligible to continue receiving its fair share of Measure "A" revenues. If you should have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me via email at sloriso@jurupavalley.org or via telephone at (951) 332-6464 x233. Sincerely, r` Steve R. Loriso, P.E. Deputy City Engineer Cc: Gary S. Thompson, City Manager George Wentz, Assistant City Manager Jim Smith, City Engineer 8930 Limonite Ave., Jurupa Valley, CA 92509-5183, (951) 332-6464 www.jurupavalley.org Verne Lauritzen, Mayor . Micheal Goodland, Mayor Pro Tem . Brian Berkson, Council Member . Anthony Kelly Jr., Council Member . Laura Roughton, Council Member FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2017/ 18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Jurupa Valley (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $0, scheduled for approval by the Commission at its July, 2017 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: , 2017 ompson y Manager ATTES Victoria Wasko, CMC City Clerk 8930 Limonite Ave., Jurupa Valley, CA 92509-5183, (951) 332-6464 ww w.jurupavalley. org RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM CITY OFJURUPA VALLEY ` W MEASURE "A" LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) FY 2017/2on - 2021/2022 MAY, 2017 ATTACHMENT 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017-2018 Agency: City of Jurupa Valley Date: May 8, 2017 Adopted: May 18, 2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 633,295 FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: 1,874,000 FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: (937,000) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,570,295 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 1,896,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 3,466,295 ITEM NO. ' ROJECT DESCRIPTION ..� D�� • MEASU • • FY 2017/18 2017.1 Payback of MARA Advance 2017.2 Mission Blvd. Bridge Co-op Agreement with Riverside County (PA/ED) $54,000 2017.3 Annual Pavement Rehab Various Locations Citywide $3,600,000 COP proceeds = $3,500,000 $1,167,000 $54,000 D, B, & C $100,000 2017.4 Annual Miscellaneous Street Various Locations Citywide Maintenance (Slurry/Crack Seal) Program $300,000 D, B, & C $300,000 2017.5 Debt Service - Local Measure A Various Locations Citywide Sales Tax Revenue Certificates of Participation $468,000 2017.6 8% Overhead/ Administration Inter -fund 8% Transfer per Measure A $468,000 Administrative Inter -Fund Transfer $151,680 RCTC 2/6/17 Budget Projection NOTE: D = Design B = Bid/Award C = Construction TOT BUDGET = $2,240,680 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018-2019 Agency: City of Jurupa Valley Date: May 8, 2017 Adopted: May 18, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,225,615 Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: 1,934,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 3,159,615 ROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT LIMITS MEASURE A ' OJECT COST FY 2018/19 2018.1 Van Buren Blvd Pavement Rehab Jurupa to Bellegrave Ph 2 $1,300,000 Gas Tax=$1,100,000 D, B & C 2018.2 Country Village Rd Pavement SR60 to RCFC&WCD Channel Rehab Ph 2 $600,000 Gas Tax = $600,000 D, B & C 2018.3 Mission Blvd. Bridge Co-op Agreement with Riverside County (PS&E) $35,000 D 2018.4 Annual Pavement Rehab Various Locations Citywide 2018.5 Annual Miscellaneous Street Various Locations Citywide Maintenance (Slurry/Crack Seal) Program $200,000 D,B&C 2018.6 Debt Service - Local Measure A Various Locations Citywide Sales Tax Revenue Certificates of Participation $1, 204, 000 2018.7 8% Overhead/ Administration Inter -fund 8% Transfer per Measure A RCTC 2/6/17 Budget Projection NOTE: D = Design B = Bid/Award C = Construction Administrative Inter -Fund Transfer $200,000 $0 $35,000 $100, 000 $200,000 $1, 204, 000 $140, 000 TOT BUDGET = $1,879,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019-2020 Agency: City of Jurupa Valley Date: May 8, 2017 Adopted: May 18, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,280,615 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 1,973,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 3,253,615 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT LIMITS ST FY 2019/20 2019.1 Pacific Ave Pavement Rehab 45th to Mission $600,000 Gas Tax = $500,000 2019.2 46th St Pavement Rehab Riverview to 1250' E/o Fort complete 2019.3 Mission Blvd. Bridge Co-op Agreement with Riverside County (Construction) $240,000 B & C 2019.4 Annual Pavement Rehab Various Locations Citywide $750,000 Gas Tax = $650,000 2019.5 Annual Miscellaneous Street Various Locations Citywide Maintenance (Slurry/Crack Seal) Program $200,000 D, B &C 2019.6 Debt Service - Local Measure A Various Locations Citywide Sales Tax Revenue Certificates of Participation $1, 204, 000 2019.7 8% Overhead/ Administration Inter -fund 8%Transfer per Measure A RCTC 2/6/17 Budget Projection NOTE: D = Design B = Bid/Award C = Construction Administrative Inter -Fund Transfer MEASURE A $100, 000 $0 $ 240, 000 $100, 000 $200,000 $1, 204, 000 $139, 000 TOT BUDGET = $1,983,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020-2021 Agency: City of Jurupa Valley Date: May 8, 2017 Adopted: May 18, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,270,615 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 2,012,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 3,282,615 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT LIMITS ST FY 2020/21 2020.1 Rubidoux Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation Mission Blvd to SR60 $650,000 Gas Tax=$650,000 D,B&C 2020.2 Valley Way Pavement Reahb Mission to Jurupa $400,000 Gas Tax=$300,000 D, B & C 2020.3 Annual Pavement Rehab Various Locations Citywide $750,000 Gas Tax = $650,000 2020.4 Mission Blvd. Bridge Co-op Agreement with Riverside County (Construction) $240,000 B & C 2020.5 Annual Miscellaneous Street Various Locations Citywide Maintenance (Slurry/Crack Seal) Program $200,000 D,B&C 2020.6 Debt Service - Local Measure A Various Locations Citywide Sales Tax Revenue Certificates of Participation $1, 204, 000 2020.7 8% Overhead/ Administration Inter -fund 8%Transfer per Measure A RCTC 2/6/17 Budget Projection NOTE: D = Design B = Bid/Award C = Construction Administrative Inter -Fund Transfer MEASURE A $0 $100, 000 $100, 000 $ 240, 000 $200,000 $1, 204, 000 $139, 000 TOT BUDGET = $1,983,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021-2022 Agency: City of Jurupa Valley Date: May 8, 2017 Adopted: May 18, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,299,615 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 2,052,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 3,351,615 ROJECT DESCRIPTION 2021.1 Annual Pavement Rehab Various Locations Citywide $750,000 Gas Tax = $250,000 2021.2 Annual Miscellaneous Street Various Locations Citywide Maintenance (Slurry/Crack Seal) Program $200,000 MEASURE A FY 2020/21 $500,000 D, B & C $200,000 2021.3 Debt Service - Local Measure A Various Locations Citywide Sales Tax Revenue Certificates of Participation $1,204,000 2021.4 8% Overhead/ Administration Inter -fund 8% Transfer per Measure A $1, 204, 000 Administrative Inter -Fund Transfer $152,000 RCTC 2/6/17 Budget Projection NOTE: D = Design B = Bid/Award C = Construction TOT BUDGET = $2,056,000 468000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Jurupa Valley Page: 1 of 1 Prepared by: Carolina Fernandez Phone #: 951-332-6464 Date: 5/2/2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Budget Measure A Funds Expended Estimated Completion Status Pacific Ave Pavement Rehabilitation: 2015.2 From 45th St. to Mission Blvd. Pavement Rehab $ - $ - $ - Delayed Delayed to FY19/20 (Coordination with RCSD Water Project). 2015.3 Golden West Sidewalk Infill Project Complete - Pending 2016.4 (45th Street to Rathke Ave.) Sidewalk Infill 400,000 185,000 20,000 March 2017 notice of completion 2015.4 Mission Blvd. Bridge (PA/ED) Co-op agreement with 54,000 - 50,000 On Going On -going 2016.5 Riverside County Annual (FY 15/16) Miscellaneous St Did not Complete for 2015.8 Maintenance Program (Slurry/Crack Street Maintenance 100,000 Delayed FY16/17 Seal 2015.9 8% Overhead/ Administration Administration 147,000 147,000 125,000 June 2016 Complete 2015.1 Van Buren Pavement Rehab Ph 1A; 38,000 38,000 Dec 2016 Environmental 2016.3 Limonite to 56th Pavement Rehab 38,000 Clearance Pyrite St Pavement Rehab; Jurupa to Co-op agreement with Complete -Pending 2015.11 Lone Trail Riverside County Flood 615,000 615,000 200,000 June 2017 notice of completion Control 2015.12 Limonite Widening; Etiwanda to Bain Street Widening 504,000 504,000 504,000 June 2017 Under Consturction 2016.1 2016.7 Troth St. Sidewalk Project' 58th to Sidewalk Infill 752,000 250,000 Sept 2017 Construction 2017 Jurupa 2019.2 46th St (Riverview to 1250' E/O Fort) Pavement Rehab 500,000 250,000 - May 2017 Complete TOTALS $ 3,010,000 $ 2,089,000 $ 937,000 This page left intentionally blank. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF LA QUINTA This page left intentionally blank. -l'!f \I-„/rh,lH'sd KI'- May 4, 2017 Lorelle Moe -Luna Senior Management Analyst Programming and Planning Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Subject: City of La Quinta Fiscal Year 2017/2018 - 2021/2022 Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan and Maintenance of Effort Certification Dear Ms. Moe -Luna, The City of La Quinta respectfully submits its Measure A Capital Improvement Plan, Project Status Report and Maintenance of Effort Certification for the Commission's review and approval. The City of La Quinta is a full participant in the Coachella Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Programs. Please do not hesitate to contact Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer, at (760) 777-7042 or Nick Nickerson, Project Manager, at (760) 323-5344 if you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, )t FRANK J. S City Manager Enclosures 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 760.777.7000 FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of La Quinta (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $937,007, approved by the Commission at its June 12, 2013 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: , 2017 Frank J. va ATTEST: t" City Manager Susan Maysels, City lerk RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: Prepared by Phone #: Date: City of La Quinta Timothy R.Jonasson (760)777-7042 3-May-17 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 791,552 735,000 (798,112) $ 728,440 724,500 $ 1,452,940 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Annual Recurring Program $ 235,000 $ 235,000 2 Dune Palms Road Improvements (Black Hawk Way to Whitewater River) Street Improvement 2,483,000 310,000 3 La Quinta Village Complete Streets - A Road Diet Project ATP Project 9,604,542 239,900 4 HSIP Intersection Improvement Traffic Control 1,260,400 103,300 5 Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive Triple Left Turn Lanes Traffic Control 1,530,617 551,985 TOTALS $ 15,113,559 $ 1,440,185 FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of La Quinta Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson Phone #: (760) 777-7042 Date: 3-May-17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 12,755 739,000 751,755 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018 - 2019 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Annual Recurring Program $ 235,000 $ 235,000 2 Jefferson Street at Avenue 53 Roundabout Traffic Control 1,136,000 516,755 TOTALS $ 1,371,000 $ 751,755 FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of La Quinta Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson Phone #: (760) 777-7042 Date: 3-May-17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ *Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 1,454,700 1,454,700 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Annual Recurring Program $ 235,000 $ 235,000 2 Jefferson Street at Avenue 53 Roundabout Traffic Control 1,136,000 329,245 3 Highway 111 at La Quinta Center Drive Dual Left Turn Lanes Traffic Control 600,000 600,000 TOTALS $ 1,971,000 $ 1,164,245 * Note: In acco dance with CVAG's Payment Schedule, 100% of City's Measure A funds will be available beginning this Fiscal Year. FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of La Quinta Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson Phone #: (760) 777-7042 Date: 3-May-17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 290,455 1,538,000 1,828,455 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Annual Recurring Program $ 235,000 $ 235,000 2 Washington Street at Washington Park Left Turn Lane Traffic Control 258,000 258,000 3 New Traffic Signal (Dune Palms Road @ Corporate Center Drive) Traffic Control 430,000 430,000 4 Washington Street at Miles Dual Left Turn Lanes Traffic Control 765,000 382,500 TOTALS $ 1,688,000 $ 1,305,500 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of La Quinta Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson Phone #: (760) 777-7042 Date: 3-May-17 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 522,955 1,569,000 2,091,955 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Annual Recurring Program $ 235,000 $ 235,000 2 Jefferson Street at Quarry Lane Mini Roundabout Traffic Control 846,000 846,000 3 Highway 111/Simon Drive Dual Left Turn Lanes Traffic Control 650,000 650,000 TOTALS $ 1,731,000 $ 1,731,000 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of La Quinta Prepared by: Timothy R. Jonasson Phone #: (760) 777-7042 Date: 3-May-17 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost (Measure A) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Citywide Street and Traffic Signal Maintenance Program Street/Signal Maintenance $ 237,298 $ 237,298 30-Jun-17 Annual Recurring Program 2 Dune Palms Road Improvement (Black Hawk Way to Whitewater Channel) Street Improvement 383,000 73,514 30-Jun-18 PS&E/ROW Phase 3 Eisenhower Drive Pavement Rehabilitation Street Rehabilitation 400,000 356,347 31-Jan-17 Project Complete 4 New Traffic Signal (Jefferson Street at Dunbar) Traffic Control 47,500 47,500 31-Jan-17 Project Complete 5 La Quinta Village Complete Streets - A Road Diet Project ATP Project 289,900 50,000 30-Jun-21 Formerly Eisenhower Drive at Montezuma Roundabout 6 HSIP Intersection Improvements Traffic Control 126,100 22,798 30-Jun-18 PA/ED/PS&E 7 Avenue 52 at Jefferson Street Roundabout Striping Modification Traffic Control 10,655 10,655 30-Jun-17 Carry -Over (Project Complete) TOTALS $ 1,494,453 $ 798,112 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE This page left intentionally blank. CITY OF�r LAKE)LSINOU DREAM EXTREME May 4, 2017 Ms. LoreIle Moe -Luna Programming & Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Subject: City of Lake Elsinore Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (FYs 2017/2018-2021/2022) Dear Ms. Moe-Lna The City of Lake Elsinore has updated the Five Year Plan and the following documents are enclosed for your review: • City of Lake Elsinore Maintenance of Effort (MOE) signed Certification Statement for FY 2017-2018 • Measure A Five -Year CIP plans for FYs 2017/2018-2021/2022 • Project Status Report for FY 2016-17 Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (951) 674-3124 Ext. 362. Sincerely, ason Simpson Assistant City Manager 951.674.3124 130 S. MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530 www. LA KE- E LS I NO RE.O RG FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Lake Elsinore (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $960,771, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 516 ; 2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Prepared by: SHANNON BUCKLEY Phone #: 951-674-3124 x 309 Date: 5/2/2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 1,125,781 FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: 1,205,000 FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: (1,189,278) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,141,503 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 1,280,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 2,421,503 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 ANNUAL CITYWIDE CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE $ 203,636 $ 203,636 2 ANNUAL CITYWIDE ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 150,000 150,000 3 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM SIDEWALK INSTALLATION 735,434 196,519 4 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 625,000 625,000 5 ANNUAL CITYWIDE TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 175,000 175,000 6 I-15/STATE ROUTE 74 INTERCHANGE CONSTRUCTION 2,934,251 300,000 7 MAIN STREET INTERCHANGE CONSTRUCTION 2,937,224 275,410 8 DEBT SERVICE - LOCAL MEASURE A SALES TAX REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, SERIES 2014A (T.R.I.P. - TOTAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) DEBT SERVICE 495,938 495,938 TOTALS $ 8,256,483 $ 2,421,503 FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SHANNON BUCKLEY 951-674-3124 x 309 5/2/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: 1,306,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 1,306,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 ANNUAL CITYWIDE CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE $ 55,000 $ 55,000 2 ANNUAL CITYWIDE ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 170,000 170,000 3 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM SIDEWALK INSTALLATION 100,000 50,000 4 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 375,000 375,000 5 ANNUAL CITYWIDE TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 215,000 156,000 6 DEBT SERVICE - LOCAL MEASURE A SALES TAX REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, SERIES 2014A (T.R.I.P. - TOTAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) DEBT SERVICE 500,000 500,000 TOTALS $ 1,415,000 $ 1,306,000 FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SHANNON BUCKLEY 951-674-3124 x 309 5/2/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2019 - 2020 Measure A Allocation: 1,332,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019 - 2020 Projects: $ 1,332,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 ANNUAL CITYWIDE CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE $ 55,000 $ 55,000 2 ANNUAL CITYWIDE ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 190,000 170,000 3 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM SIDEWALK INSTALLATION 100,000 100,000 4 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 390,000 375,000 5 ANNUAL CITYWIDE TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 215,000 132,000 6 DEBT SERVICE - LOCAL MEASURE A SALES TAX REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, SERIES 2014A (T.R.I.P. - TOTAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) DEBT SERVICE 500,000 500,000 TOTALS $ 1,450,000 $ 1,332,000 FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SHANNON BUCKLEY 951-674-3124 x 309 5/2/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2020 - 2021 Measure A Allocation: 1,359,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020- 2021 Projects: $ 1,359,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 ANNUAL CITYWIDE CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE $ 90,000 $ 90,000 2 ANNUAL CITYWIDE ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 200,000 179,000 3 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM SIDEWALK INSTALLATION 56,000 56,000 4 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 485,000 375,000 5 ANNUAL CITYWIDE TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 215,000 159,000 6 DEBT SERVICE - LOCAL MEASURE A SALES TAX REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, SERIES 2014A (T.R.I.P. - TOTAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) DEBT SERVICE 500,000 500,000 TOTALS $ 1,546,000 $ 1,359,000 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE SHANNON BUCKLEY 951-674-3124 x 309 5/2/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2021 - 2022 Measure A Allocation: 1,386,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021- 2022 Projects: $ 1,386,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 ANNUAL CITYWIDE CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE $ 90,000 $ 70,000 2 ANNUAL CITYWIDE ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 215,000 170,000 3 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM SIDEWALK INSTALLATION 60,000 56,000 4 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 490,000 375,000 5 ANNUAL CITYWIDE TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 215,000 215,000 6 DEBT SERVICE - LOCAL MEASURE A SALES TAX REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, SERIES 2014A (T.R.I.P. - TOTAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) DEBT SERVICE 500,000 500,000 TOTALS $ 1,570,000 $ 1,386,000 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Prepared by: SHANNON BUCKLEY Phone #: 951-674-3124 x 309 Date: 5/2/2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 ANNUAL CITYWIDE CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK PROGRAM MAINTENANCE $ 55,000 $ 40,366 6/30/2017 PROJECT IS ANNUAL AND ONGOING 2 ANNUAL CITYWIDE ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 100,000 100,000 6/30/2017 PROJECT IS ANNUAL AND ONGOING 3 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 123,257 6,950 5/1/2017 PROJECT IS COMPLETE FOR FY16-17 4 ANNUAL CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 351,700 351,700 6/30/2017 PROJECT IS ANNUAL AND ONGOING 5 ANNUAL CITYWIDE TRAFFIC STRIPING MAINTENANCE PROGRAM MAINTENANCE 175,000 99,540 6/30/2017 PROJECT IS ANNUAL AND ONGOING 6 GUNNERSON REHABILITATION PH 1 - PROJECT 4350 REHABILITATION 12,195,210 21,549 05/25/17 PROJECT IS COMPLETE FOR FY16-17 7 I-15/STATE ROUTE 74 INTERCHANGE PROJECT - PA&ED PHASE OF IC AND RAMP IMPROVEMENTS. Z10015 CONSTRUCTION 2,400,000 960 6/30/2018 PROJECT IS ON SCHEDULE 8 MAIN STREET INTERCHANGE CONSTRUCTION 3,400,000 64,911 6/30/2018 PROJECT IS ON SCHEDULE 9 DEBT SERVICE - LOCAL MEASURE A SALES TAX REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, SERIES 2014A (T.R.I.P. - TOTAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) DEBT SERVICE 500,000 503,302 - ONGOING TOTALS $ 19,300,167 $ 1,189,278 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF MENIFEE This page left intentionally blank. Scott A. Mann Mayor Greg August Mayor Pro Tem Lexa Sobek Councilmember Matthew Liesemeyer Councilmember John V. Denver Councilmember 29714 Haun Road Menifee, CA 92586 Phone 951.67x.6777 Fax 951.679.3843 www.cityofinenifee.us May 9, 2017 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street 3`d Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Ms. Lorella Moe -Luna Subject: CIP and Project Status Report Ms. Moe -Luna Enclosed please find the City of Menifee's Measure A Local Funds Capital Improvement Program for FY 2017/18 through 2021/22 and the project status report for FY 201 b117. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions or need additional information. Thanks you, Bruce Foltz Finance Director FY 201 M8 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Menifee (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $214,225, approved by the Commission at its September 11, 2013 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: rn , 2017 02-7 INTERIM CITY MANAGER ATT SE RET RY FY 2017 - 2018 City of Menifee Bruce Foltz 951-723-3703 May 3 2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017-2018 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 2,707,434 $ 1,528,000 $ (4,047,386) $ 188,047 $ 1,624,000 $ 1,812,047 Item Number Project Name Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 Bond Payment for TRIP Financing Pavement Management Program Debt Service Maintenance $ 20,000,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,301,088 $ 375,000 Total $ 21,600,000 $ 1,676,088 Balance Remaining $ 135,959 Page 1 of 6 FY 2018 - 2019 City of Menifee Bruce Foltz 951-723-3703 May 3 2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018-2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 135,959 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,656,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 1,791,959 Item Number Project Name Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 Bond Payment for TRIP Financing Pavement Management Program Debt Service Maintenance $ 20,000,000 $ 1,750,000 $ 1,305,488 $ 350,000 Total $ 21,750,000 $ 1,655,488 Balance Remaining $ 136,471 Page 2 of 6 FY 2019 - 2020 City of Menifee Bruce Foltz 951-723-3703 May 3 2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019-2020 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 136,471 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,689,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 1,825,471 Item Number Project Name Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 Bond Payment for TRIP Financing Pavement Management Program Debt Service Maintenance $ 20,000,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,304,088 $ 400,000 Total $ 21,800,000 $ 1,704,088 Balance Remaining $ 121,383 Page 3 of 6 FY 2020 - 2021 City of Menifee Bruce Foltz 951-723-3703 May 3 2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020-2021 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 121,383 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,723,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 1,844,383 Item Number Project Name Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 Bond Payment for TRIP Financing Pavement Management Program Debt Service Maintenance $ 20,000,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,302,838 $ 500,000 Total $ 21,800,000 $ 1,802,838 Balance Remaining $ 41,546 Page 4 of 6 FY 2021- 2022 City of Menifee Bruce Foltz 951-723-3703 May 3 2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021-2022 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 41,546 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,757,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 1,798,546 Item Number Project Name Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 2 Bond Payment for TRIP Financing Pavement Management Program Debt Service Maintenance $ 20,000,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,305,588 $ 400,000 Total $ 21,800,000 $ 1,705,588 Balance Remaining $ 92,958 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 City of Menifee Bruce Foltz 951-723-3703 May 3 2017 Item Numb er Project Name Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds 6/30/2017 Estimated Completion Status 1 Bond Payment for TRIP Financing Debt Service $ 20,000,000 $ 1,302,488 30 Year Bond Payment Active 2 Pavement Management Program Maintenance $ 475,000 $ 475,000 Yearly Road Maint. Active 3 Bradley Bridge Study $ 499,903 $ 240,144 FY 2019-2021 Preliminary Design 4 Menifee Road Resurfacing Reconstruction $ 83,928 $ 83,928 FY 2016-17 Completed 5 Newport Road Haun to Bradley Road Widening $ 204,000 $ 69,463 FY 2016-17 Active Construction 6 Newport Road Bradley to Murrieta Improvements $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 FY 2016-17 Active Construction 7 Holland & Haun Road Widening Road Widening $ 370,000 $ 370,000 FY 2016-17 Completed 8 Goetz Road Improvements Improvements $ 85,000 $ 85,000 FY 2016-17 Active 9 Briggs Road Widening Road Widening $ 107,696 $ 107,696 FY 2016-17 Completed 10 1215/Newport Road Interchange Road Widening $ 313,668 $ 313,668 FY 2016-17 Completed Total $ 23,139,195 $ 4,047,386 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF MORENO VALLEY This page left intentionally blank. TEL: 951.413.3100 WWW.MOVAL.ORG April 26, 2017 F MORENO i VALLEY WHERE DREAMS SOAR Ms. Lorelle Moe -Luna Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3`d Floor Riverside, California 92502 14177FREDERICK STREET P.O. BOX 88005 MORENO VALLEY, CA 92552-0805 Subject: City of Moreno Valley's Five -Year Measure A Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2017/18 — 2021/22 and Maintenance of Effort Certification for Fiscal Year 2017/18. Dear Ms. Moe -Luna: The City of Moreno Valley is pleased to submit its Fiscal Year (FY) 2017/18 — 2021/22 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification, approved by the City Council on April 18, 2017. An amended five-year Measure A CIP will be submitted to RCTC if changes are made by City Council to the listed Measure A projects as part of the upcoming FY 2017/18-2018/19 CIP approval process. Please contact me if there are any questions regarding the Measure A CIP. Sincerely, Launa Jimenez Senior Management Analyst (951) 413-3128 launaj@moval.org Enclosures: MOE Certification Statement Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2017/18 - 2021/22 Measure A Local Funds Program FY 2016/17 Project Status Report c: File Ahmad R. Ansari, Public Works Director/City Engineer Marshall Eyerman, Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Moreno Valley (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $1,459,153 (city contribution), approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: ji 2 , 2017 EST: C RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Prepared by: Launa Jimenez Phone #: (951) 413-3128 Date: April 18, 2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 7,716,366 3,703,000 (8,261,035) $ 3,158,331 3,829,000 $ 6,987,331 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 Measure A Program Budget Provide cost effective administrative functions for essential transportation projects and services; annual update of the Five - Year CIP, revisions to Standard Plans, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program Management, Pavement Management Program, preparation of grant applications, quarterly utility coordination, and project engineering and right of way services for 1 unfunded new projects Program Budget $ 232,945 $ 232,945 2 Public Works - Sign/Striping Operating Budget 1,151,878 1,151,878 3 Public Works - Tree Trimming Operating Budget 476,313 476,313 4 Indirect Cost Rate (Including Leave Buyouts) Overhead Costs - - 5 Transfers to 2013/2014 Refunding Lease Revenue Bonds Debt Service 1,064,000 1,064,000 6 Transfers to TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 1,489,000 1,489,000 7 Alessandro Blvd / Elsworth Street Intersection Impry Street Improvements 602,650 83,017 8 Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramp Upgrades Street Improvements 198,855 198,855 9 Bike Lane Improvements Street Improvements (Bike Lanes) 80,241 80,241 10 Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing Street Improvements 166,721 166,721 11 Cycle 1 ATP Citywide SRTS Pedestrian Facility Improvements Street Improvements 1,491,204 11,204 12 Heacock St / Perris Valley Storm Drain Lateral A to Cactus Ave Street Improvements 1,050,000 50,000 13 Pavement Rehabilitation Program Street Improvements 64,623 64,623 14 Property Acquisition for Street Purposes Street Improvements 11,061 11,061 15 Reche Vista Dr Realignment / Perris Blvd / Heacock St to NCL Street Improvements 5,000 5,000 16 Residential Traffic Management Program ( Speed Hump) Street Improvements 51,058 51,058 17 SR-60 / Theodore Street Interchange Street Improvements 392,677 100,452 Moreno Townsite Area Storm Drain & Street Improvements/ 18 Alessandro Blvd to Drainage Facility Street Improvements 3,860,090 585,092 19 Heacock Street Channel Improvements Drainage 238,783 94,322 20 San Timoteo Foothill Storm Drain K-1 and K-4 (ADP) Drainage 2,119,585 260,618 21 Dynamic Traveler Alert Message Boards Traffic Enhancements 395,000 10,000 22 Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon on Cactus Ave at Woodland Park Traffic Signals 189,000 189,000 23 Traffic Signal Equipment/ Upgrades Traffic Signals 37,215 37,215 TOTALS FUND 2301 - Capital Projects Grants $ 15,367,899 $ 6,412,615 The FY 14/15 transfer of $1,495,760 from Measure A (Fund 2001) to Capital Projects Grant (Fund 2301) provided local match funding for the following grant awards. The FY 17/18 budgets and expenditures in Capital Projects Grants do not impact the Measure A fund. Any unused local match funds will be transferred back to the Measure A fund upon project completion. Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 1 Alessandro Blvd at Chagall Court and at Graham Street 2 Aqueduct Trail 3 Dynamic Traveler Alert Message Boards 4 ITS Deployment Phase 1 B 5 Safe Routes to School Outreach Program Street Improvements Street Improvements Traffic Signals Traffic Signals Public Outreach $ 512,000 $ 50,000 385,000 2,201,905 30,000 $ 3,178,905 $ 51,200 10,000 44,500 329,250 3,003 437,953 FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Prepared by: Launa Jimenez Phone #: (951) 413-3128 Date: April 18, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 574,716 Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: 3,906,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 4,480,716 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018 - 2019 1 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget $ 235,761 $ 235,761 2 Public Works - Sign/ Striping Operating Budget 1,168,911 1,168,911 3 Public Works - Tree Trimming Operating Budget 493,242 493,242 4 Indirect Cost Rate Overhead Costs - - Transfer to DIF Arterial Streets; 2013/2014 Refunding Lease 5 Revenue Bonds Debt Service 1,064,000 1,064,000 6 Transfer to TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 1,491,000 1,491,000 TOTALS $ 4,452,914 $ 4,452,914 FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Prepared by: Launa Jimenez Phone #: (951) 413-3128 Date: April 18, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 27,802 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 3,984,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 4,011,802 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget $ 235,761 $ 235,761 2 Public Works - Sign/ Striping Operating Budget 1,168,911 858,698 3 Public Works - Tree Trimming Operating Budget 493,242 362,343 4 Indirect Cost Rate Overhead Costs - - Transfer to DIF Arterial Streets; 2013/2014 Refunding Lease 5 Revenue Bonds Debt Service 1,064,000 1,064,000 6 Transfer to TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 1,491,000 1,491,000 TOTALS $ 4,452,914 $ 4,011,802 FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Prepared by: Launa Jimenez Phone #: (951) 413-3128 Date: April 18, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 4,064,000 4,064,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget $ 235,761 $ 235,761 2 Public Works - Sign/ Striping Operating Budget 1,168,911 895,407 3 Public Works - Tree Trimming Operating Budget 493,242 377,832 4 Indirect Cost Rate Overhead Costs - - Transfer to DIF Arterial Streets; 2013/2014 Refunding Lease 5 Revenue Bonds Debt Service 1,064,000 1,064,000 6 Transfer to TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 1,491,000 1,491,000 TOTALS $ 4,452,914 $ 4,064,000 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Prepared by: Launa Jimenez Phone #: (951) 413-3128 Date: April 18, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 4,145,000 4,145,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 1 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget $ 235,761 $ 235,761 2 Public Works - Sign/ Striping Operating Budget 1,168,911 952,370 3 Public Works - Tree Trimming Operating Budget 493,242 401,869 4 Indirect Cost Rate Overhead Costs - - Transfer to DIF Arterial Streets; 2013/2014 Refunding Lease 5 Revenue Bonds Debt Service 1,064,000 1,064,000 6 Transfer to TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 1,491,000 1,491,000 TOTALS $ 4,452,914 $ 4,145,000 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Moreno Valley Prepared by: Launa Jimenez Phone #: (951)413-3128 Date: April 18, 2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Measure A Program Budget Program Budget $ 337,395.00 $ 337,395.00 N/A Annual Budget 2 Public Works - Sign/Striping Operating Budget 1,233,122 1,233,122 N/A Annual Budget 3 Public Works - Tree Trimming Operating Budget 510,294 510,294 N/A Annual Budget 4 Indirect Cost Rate (Including Leave Buyouts) Overhead Costs - - N/A Annual Budget 5 Transfer to DIF Arterial Streets; 2013/2014 Refunding Lease Revenue Bonds Debt Service 1,064,000 1,064,000 N/A Annual Budget 6 Transfer to TRIP Debt Service Debt Service 1,489,000 1,489,000 N/A Annual Budget 7 _ Alessandro Blvd / Elsworth St Intersection Improvements Street Improvements 1,102,650 35,000 Oct-17 Advertise/ Award Construction Contract 8 Alessandro Boulevard Entry Monument Signs Street Improvements 117,646 117,646 Apr-17 Completed Apr-17 9 Annual ADA Compliant Curb Ramp Upgrades Street Improvements 393,895 195,040 N/A On -going Annual Project 10 Bike Lane Improvements Street Improvements 110,241 30,000 N/A On -going Annual Project 11 Citywide Annual Pavement Resurfacing Street Improvements 1,154,986 535,310 N/A On -going Annual Project 12 Cycle 1 ATP Citywide SRTS Pedestrian Facility Improvements Street Improvements 1,651,204 0 Jan-18 Pending CalTrans authorization for construction 13 Edgemont Neighborhood Pavement Resurfacing Street Improvements 270,000 270,000 Mar-17 Completed Mar-17 14 Heacock St / Perris Valley Storm Drain Lateral A to Cactus Ave Street Improvements 1,439,448 289,448 Oct-17 Construction 15 Nason Street / Cactus Avenue to Fir Avenue Street Improvements 234,350 211,000 Jan-17 Completed Jan-17 16 Pavement Rehabilitation Street Improvements 114,623 50,000 N/A On -going Annual Project 17 Perris Blvd/ Ironwood Ave to Manzanita Ave Street Improvements 92,534 5,200 Dec-15 Completed Dec-16 18 Property Acquisition for Street Purposes Street Improvements 26,061 15,000 N/A On -going Annual Project 19 Reche Vista Dr Realignment / Perris Blvd / Heacock St to NCL Street Improvements 1,968,891 778,364 Mar-17 Warranty Walk Mar- 18 20 Residential Traffic Management Program (Speed Humps) Street Improvements 76,058 25,000 N/A On -going Annual Project 21 SR-60 / Moreno Beach Dr South Side of Interchange (Phase 1) Street Improvements 193,872 10,000 Oct-13 Completed Oct-16 22 SR-60 / Theodore Street Interchange Street Improvements 1,842,677 800,000 Jun-18 Preliminary Engineering 23 Street Improvement Program Street Improvements 3,236,692 42,500 Apr-18 Design 24 Sunnymead Blvd / SR-60 EB Onramp Intersection Impry Street Improvements 60 60 Jan-17 Project will be designed and constructed by Caltrans 25 Bridge Repair Maintenance Program Bridge Maintenance 10,000 10,000 N/A Ongoing Annual Project 26 Heacock Street Channel Improvements Drainage 698,783 10,000 Mar-18 Advertise/ Award Construction Contract 27 San Timoteo Foothill Storm Drain K-1 and K-4 (ADP) Drainage 1,659,085 30,000 May-18 Design 28 Dynamic Traveler Alert Message Boards Traffic Signals 422,810 27,810 Jun-18 Environmental Clearance 29 Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon on Cactus Ave at Woodland Park Traffic Signals 218,846 29,846 Oct-17 Advertise/ Award Construction Contract 30 Traffic Signal Equipment / Upgrades Traffic Signals 147,215 110,000 N/A Ongoing Annual Project TOTALS FUND 2301 - Capital Projects Grants $ 21,816,438.00 $ 8,261,035.00 The FY 14/15 transfer of $1,495,760 from Measure A (Fund 2001) to Capital Projects Grant (Fund 2301) provided local match funding for the following grant awards. The FY 15/16 budgets and expenditures in Capital Projects Grants do not impact the Measure A fund. Any unused local match funds will be transferred back to the Measure A fund upon project completion. Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Alessandro Blvd at Chagall Court and at Graham Street Street Improvements $ 605,376 $ 9,338 Jun-18 Pending CalTrans authorization for construction 2 Aqueduct Trail Street Improvements 165,362 23,072 Aug-17 Preliminary Engineering 3 Cactus Ave EB 3rd Ln ImprvNeterans Way to Heacock St Street Improvements 21,449 0 Jan-16 Completed Jan-17 4 Dynamic Traveler Alert Message Boards Traffic Signals 385,000 0 Jun-18 Design 5 ITS Deployment Phase 1 B Traffic Signals 2,246,905 0 Jun-18 Design 6 Safe Routes to School Outreach Program Public Outreach 417,600 38,799 Mar-18 Complete Program June-17 TOTALS 1 $ 3,841,692 I $ 71,209 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF MURRIETA This page left intentionally blank. CITY OF MURRIETA May 8, 2017 Grace Alvarez, Programming and Planning Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.C. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Subject; Measure a Local Streets and Road Revenue Projections, Maintenance of Effort Certification, and Five -Year Capital Improvement Plans (FY 2017/18-2021 /22) Dear Grace: Enclosed are the Maintenance of Effort (MCI~) Certification Statement, proposed Measure A Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), and Project Status Report for the City of Murrieta for your consideration and approval. Since the City Council has not adopted a formal Capital Improvement Plan budget for FY 2018-22, the enclosed Five - Year C1P is based on staff recommendation and may be subject to change upon further consideration by the City Council, We will contact you if there are any changes requested by the City Council. The Measure A balance carried over to FY 2017/18 is large due to several projects that are progressing through the right-of-way acquisition phase prior to construction and the off year for the asphalt overlay/resurfacing project. If you have any questions or would like to discuss this matter further, please contact me at (951) 461-6036 or bmoehlinq a@murrieta.orq at your convenience. Sincerely, Bob Moehling, P.E. City Engineer Attachments cc: Rick Dudley, City Manager Ivan Haller, Director of Development Services Linda Le, director of Administrative Services Jeff Hitch/Public Works Construction Manager 1 Town Square • Murrieia, California 92562 phone: 951_304.C1TY (2489) • fax: 951.698.4509 • web: murrieta.org FY 201 M8 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Murrieta (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $595,702, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 12017 CITY iviANAGER ATTEST: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 1 of 5 Prepared by: Mark Reister, Senior Management Analyst Phone #: 951-461-6429 Date: April 25, 2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 7,187,125 FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: 2,176,000 FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: (2,208,247) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 7,154,878 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 2,299,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 9,453,878 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing Maintenance $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 2 8079 Murrieta Hot Springs Widening- Margarita to Winchester Rd Widen from 4 to 6 lanes 1,500,000 500,000 3 8137 Resurfacing - Slurry Seal Maintenance - - 4 8257 Citywide Signal Mods Signal Modifications 150,000 75,000 5 8283 Traffic Striping Modifications Traffic Striping 30,000 - 6 8293 Sidewalk Replacement- Citywide based on inspection Sidewalk Improvements 200,000 200,000 7 8303 I-215/Clinton Keith Rd Interchange IC Improvements 2,960,899 - 9 8323 Guava Bridge/Murrieta Creek Bridge Replacement 6,000,000 24,120 10 8330 Traffic Signal Optimization Traffic Signal 140,000 70,000 11 8335 Jackson Ave Bridge (at Warm Springs Creek) Bridge Installation 50,000 50,000 12 8389 Whitewood: Hunter to Clinton Keith Pavement widening - - 13 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Management Pro Traffic Management 85,000 15,000 14 8433 Mur Hot Springs Medians: Alta to Marg Construction - - 15 8448 Meadowlark Lane Improvement- Baxter to Keller Roads Pavement Extension 50,000 50,000 16 8456 Whitewood Extension- MHS Road to Jackson Ave Pavement Extension 500,000 500,000 17 10012 Jackson Ave Median Construction - - 18 COP 2007 for 15/215 MHS Interchange Debt Service 731,645 731,645 TOTALS $ 14,397,544 $ 4,215,765 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 2 of 5 Prepared by: Mark Reister, Senior Management Analyst Phone #: 951-461-6429 Date: April 25, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 5,238,113 2,156,000 7,394,113 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 Item No. 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Maintenance $ - $ - 2 8137 Pavement Resurfacing - Slurry Maintenance 1,500,000 1,300,000 3 8257 Signal Mods- Citywide Signal Modifications 150,000 75,000 4 8293 Sidewalk Replacement - Citywide Sidewalk Improvements 100,000 100,000 5 8330 Traffic Signal Optimizations Traffic Signal 140,000 70,000 6 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Manage Traffic Management 85,000 15,000 7 COP 2007 for 15/215 at MHS Int. Debt Service 728,239 728,239 TOTALS $ 2,703,239 $ 2,288,239 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 3 of 5 Prepared by: Mark Reister, Senior Management Analyst Phone #: 951-461-6429 Date: April 25, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 5,105,874 2,199, 000 7,304,874 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 Item No. 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Maintenance $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 2 8137 Pavement Resurfacing - Slurry Maintenance - - 3 8257 Signal Mods- Citywide Signal Modifications 150,000 75,000 4 8293 Sidewalk Replacement - Citywide Sidewalk Improvements - - 5 8330 Traffic Signal Optimizations Traffic Signal 140,000 70,000 6 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Manage Traffic Management 85,000 15,000 7 COP 2007 for 15/215 at MHS Int. Debt Service 728,639 728,639 TOTALS $ 2,103,639 $ 1,888,639 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 4 of 5 Prepared by: Mark Reister, Senior Management Analyst Phone #: 951-461-6429 Date: April 25, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 5,416,235 2,265,000 7,681,235 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 Item No. 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Maintenance $ - $ - 2 8137 Pavement Resurfacing - Slurry Maintenance 1,500,000 1,300,000 3 8257 Signal Mods- Citywide Signal Modifications 150,000 75,000 4 8293 Sidewalk Replacement - Citywide Sidewalk Improvements 100,000 100,000 5 8330 Traffic Signal Optimizations Traffic Signal 140,000 70,000 6 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Manage Traffic Management 85,000 15,000 7 COP 2007 for 15/215 at MHS Int. Debt Service 733,239 733,239 TOTALS $ 2,708,239 $ 2,293,239 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 5 of 5 Prepared by: Mark Reister, Senior Management Analyst Phone #: 951-461-6429 Date: April 25, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 5,387,996 2,333,000 7,720,996 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 Item No. 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing - Asphalt Maintenance $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 2 8137 Pavement Resurfacing - Slurry Maintenance - - 3 8257 Signal Mods- Citywide Signal Modifications 150,000 75,000 4 8293 Sidewalk Replacement - Citywide Sidewalk Improvements - - 5 8330 Traffic Signal Optimizations Traffic Signal 140,000 70,000 6 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Manage Traffic Management 85,000 15,000 7 COP 2007 for 15/215 at MHS Int. Debt Service 731,489 731,489 TOTALS $ 2,106,489 $ 1,891,489 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Murrieta Page 1 of 1 Prepared by: Mark Reister, Senior Management Analyst Phone #: 951-461-6429 Date: April 25, 2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 8043 Pavement Resurfacing Maintenance $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Jun-17 Ongoing annual project 2 8079 Murrieta Hot Springs Widening- Margarita to Winchester Rd Widen from 4 to 6 lanes - - Dec-18 Design, Acquire ROW, start Con 2018 3 8137 Resurfacing - Slurry Seal Maintenance - - Jun-17 Ongoing annual project 4 8257 Citywide Signal Mods Signal Modifications 397,237 340,226 Jun-17 Ongoing annual project 5 8283 Traffic Striping Modifications Traffic Striping - - Jun-17 Ongoing annual project 6 8293 Sidewalk Replacement- Citywide based on inspection Sidewalk Improvements - - Jun-17 Ongoing annual project 7 8303 I-215/Clinton Keith Rd Interchange IC Improvements 71,102 - Dec-18 Landscape Design/Const in progress 8 8311 I-15/Los Alamos Rd Overcrossing Construction - - Dec-17 Project closeout in progress 9 8323 Guava Bridge/Murrieta Creek Bridge Replacement 28,408 17,876 May-18 Start const. in July 2017 10 8330 Traffic Signal Optimization Traffic Signal 57,390 - Jun-17 Ongoing annual project 11 8335 Jackson Ave Bridge (at Warm Springs Creek) Bridge Installation 10,848 - Jul-14 Construction complete/ongoing mitigation 12 8389 Whitewood: Hunter to Clinton Keith Pavement widening - - Jun-18 Design, ROW Acq 13 8430 Neighborhood Traffic Management Pro Traffic Management 48,070 - Jun-17 Ongoing annual project 14 8433 Mur Hot Springs Medians: Alta to Marg Construction 69,041 - Apr-17 Completed 15 8448 Meadowlark Lane Improvement- Baxter to Keller Roads Pavement Extension 2,000,000 121,000 Jun-17 Construction ongoing 16 8456 Whitewood Extension- MHS Road to Jackson Ave Pavement Extension - - Dec-18 TUMF Network Addition request, Design 17 10012 Jackson Ave Median Construction - - May-18 Start const. in Mar 2018 19 COP 2007 for 15/215 MHS Interchange Debt Service 729,145 729,145 Jun-27 Construction complete / Annual Debt Service TOTALS $ 4,411,241 $ 2,208,247 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF NORCO This page left intentionally blank. CITY of NORCO CITY HALL • 2870 CLARK AVENUE • NORCO CA 92860 • 051) 735-3900 • www.norco.ca.us • In May 8, 2017 Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 RE: 2017 — 2022 Measure A Local Streets and Roads Five -Year Capital Improvement Program Plan Dear Ms. Trevino: The City of Norco is pleased to submit for your consideration and approval our Five - Year Measure "A" Capital Improvement Program Plan projections, commencing with Fiscal Year 2017/18. We have included for your records a copy of the City of Norco approved Five -Year Measure A Capital Improvement Program Fund, and the Annual Certification of the City's "Maintenance of Effort" document signed by City Manager, Andy Okoro. If you have any additional questions, regarding the City of Norco 2017 submittal, please contact me at 951-270-5678. We appreciate your cooperation and assistance with the City of Norco's planned expenditures for maintenance and capital improvements to our local streets and roads. Respectfully, Chad Blais Director of Public Works City of Norco Attachments: City of Norco Five -Year CIP Measure "A" 5-Year CIP Maintenance of Effort Letter CITY COUNCIL GREG NEWTON TED HOFFMAN BERWIN HANNA Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Council Member ROBIN GRUNDMEYER Council Member KEVIN BASH Council Member FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Norco (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $22,536, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: m Qki , 2017 c CITY II ,NrA ER RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Norco Prepared by: Chad Blais Phone #: 951-270-5678 Date: 5/8/2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: $ 2,208,938 611,000 (777,000) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 2,042,938 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 643,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 2,685,938 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Market St - Clark to Hamner Rehab and Overlay $ 120,000 $ 120,000 2 Corona Ave - First to Second Reconstruction 325,000 325,000 3 Golden Gate Circle - To Santa Anita Rd Rehab and Overlay 75,000 75,000 4 Bluff St - River Rd to Vine St Rehab and Overlay 250,000 250,000 5 Hamner - Third to Fourth Rehab and Overlay 450,000 450,000 6 Rocky View - Norco Dr to Alhambra St Overlay 50,000 50,000 7 Hillside Ave - Second to Third Reconstruction 200,000 40,000 8 Reservoir - Corona to Temescal Rehab and Overlay 250,000 250,000 9 Temescal - Seventh to River Dr Rehab and Overlay 150,000 150,000 10 Pedley - Seventh to Sixth Rehab and Overlay 200,000 50,000 11 Greentree Rd - To California Ave Rehab and Overlay 200,000 50,000 12 River Dr - Corona to Temescal Rehab and Overlay 150,000 150,000 13 Pedley - Seventh to Eigth Rehab and Overlay 150,000 150,000 14 Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay 75,000 75,000 15 Unspecified Rehabilitation Projects Rehab and Overlay 25,000 25,000 16 Unspecified Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction 20,000 20,000 17 Hamner Avenue Bridge (Planning) Reconstruction 83,000 83,000 18 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Improvements 10,000 10,000 19 Street Striping Street Striping 10,000 10,000 20 Miscellaneous Seal Coats Slurry Seal 10,000 10,000 21 Miscellaneous Pavement Repairs Maintenance 15,000 15,000 TOTALS $ 2,818,000 $ 2,358,000 FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Norco Prepared by: Chad Blais Phone #: 951-270-5678 Date: 5/8/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 327,938 Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: 656,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 983,938 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018 - 2019 1 Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay $ 50,000 $ 50,000 2 Pedley - Seventh to Sixth Rehab and Overlay 200,000 150,000 3 Greentree Rd - To California Ave Rehab and Overlay 200,000 150,000 4 Hamner Ave Bridge (Planning) Reconstruction 83,000 83,000 5 Unspecified Rehabilitation Rehab and Overlay 100,000 100,000 6 Misc. Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction 50,000 50,000 7 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Improvements 25,000 25,000 8 Street Striping Striping 25,000 25,000 9 Misc. Seal Coats Slurry Seal 25,000 25,000 10 Misc. Pavement Repairs Maintenance 25,000 25,000 TOTALS $ 783,000 $ 683,000 FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Norco Chad Blais 951-270-5678 5/8/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 300,938 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 669,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 969,938 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay $ 110,000 $ 100,000 2 Hillside Ave - Second to Third Reconstruction 200,000 100,000 3 Western - 2nd to Parkridge Rehab and Overlay 160,000 100,000 4 Chestnut - Bluff to Corydon Rehab and Overlay 200,000 200,000 5 Unspecified Rehabilitation Rehab and Overlay 100,000 100,000 6 Misc. Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction 100,000 100,000 7 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Improvements 25,000 25,000 8 Street Striping Striping 35,000 25,000 9 Misc. Seal Coats Slurry Seal 25,000 25,000 10 Misc. Pavement Repairs Maintenance 25,000 25,000 TOTALS $ 980,000 $ 800,000 FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Norco Prepared by: Chad Blais Phone #: 951-270-5678 Date: 5/8/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 169,938 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 682,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 851,938 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay $ 110,000 $ 100,000 2 Western - 2nd to Parkridge Rehab and Overlay 100,000 100,000 3 First St - Temescal to Hillside Reconstruction 200,000 200,000 4 Unspecified Rehabilitation Rehab and Overlay 100,000 100,000 5 Misc. Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction 100,000 100,000 6 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Improvements 25,000 25,000 7 Street Striping Striping 35,000 25,000 8 Misc. Seal Coats Slurry Seal 25,000 25,000 9 Misc. Pavement Repairs Maintenance 25,000 25,000 TOTALS $ 720,000 $ 700,000 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Norco Prepared by: Chad Blais Phone #: 951-270-5678 Date: 5/8/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 151,938 696,000 $ 847,938 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 1 Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay $ 110,000 $ 100,000 2 Norconian - Fifth to Norco Rehab and Overlay 350,000 350,000 3 Unspecified Rehabilitation Rehab and Overlay 100,000 100,000 4 Misc. Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction 100,000 100,000 5 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Improvements 25,000 25,000 6 Street Striping Striping 35,000 25,000 7 Misc. Seal Coats Slurry Seal 25,000 25,000 8 Misc. Pavement Repairs Maintenance 25,000 25,000 TOTALS $ 770,000 $ 750,000 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Norco Prepared by: Chad Blais Phone #: 951-270-5678 Date: 5/8/2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Unspecified Pavement Overlays Overlay $ 200,000 $ 92,000 Jun-17 Completed 2 River Rd - Bluff to Corydon Rehab and Overlay 100,000 - Removed 3 Golden Gate Circle Rehab and Overlay 25,000 6,000 Sep-17 In Bidding 4 Corona Ave - First to Second Rehab and Overlay 300,000 14,000 Jun-18 Moved to FY17/18 5 Bluff St - River Rd to Vine St Rehab and Overlay 25,000 - Jun-18 Completed 6 Unspecified Rehabilitation Rehab and Overlay 200,000 - 7 Hamner - 4th to 6th Rehab and Overlay 720,000 400,000 Oct-17 Completed 8 Temescal - 1st to 2nd Overlay 210,000 100,000 Oct-17 Completed 9 Market - Clark to Hamner Rehab and Overlay 40,000 8,000 Sep-17 In Bidding 10 6th St - Sierra to California Cape Seal 150,000 150,000 May-17 Completed 11 Reservoir - Corona to Temescal Rehab and Overlay 50,000 - Jun-18 Moved to FY17/18 12 Misc. Reconstruction Projects Reconstruction 200,000 - 13 Hamner Avenue Bridge (Planning) Reconstruction 83,000 - 14 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Improvements 75,000 - 15 Street Striping Street Striping 35,000 - 16 Miscellaneous Seal Coats Slurry Seal 75,000 7,000 May-17 Completed 17 Miscellaneous Pavement Repairs Maintenance 25,000 - TOTALS $ 2,513,000 $ 777,000 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF PALM DESERT This page left intentionally blank. CITY OF NUM DESERT 7;-510 FRED WARING DRIVE PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578 TEL: 760 346-061I info4 ci[yofpalmdewri.org May 8, 2017 LoreIle Moe -Luna Senior Management Analyst Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92502-2208 Subject: Measure A Capital Improvement Program Dear LoreIle, Enclosed for Commission consideration is the City of Palm Desert's proposed 2017/2018 — 2021/2022 Five -Year Measure A Capital Improvement Program, as well as Project Status Report for Fiscal Year 2016/2017, and the signed Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement. The Five -Year Program will be reviewed in the near future by our City Council. If the City Council makes any changes to the program, a revised version will be submitted to you for approval. If no changes are made, please treat this as the official submittal. If you have any questions, please contact me or Bertha A. Gonzalez, Accounting Technician, at (760) 346-0611, extension 473, or at bgonzalez@cityofpalmdesert.org. Sincer Mark ere wood, Director •f Public Work Enclosure cc: Lauri Aylaian, City Manager Janet M. Moore, Director of Finance J. Luis Espinoza, Assistant Director of Finance 0 n0110w sunN: Wt. FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Palm Desert (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure Al shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $2,398,146, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: , 2017 CITY MANAGER ATTEST: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Palm Desert Prepared by: Mark Greenwood, P.E. Phone #: 760-346-0611 Date: May 8, 2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: *Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 19,246,471 2,666,000 (1,925,000) 19,987,471 2,660,000 22,647,471 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Portola Interchange at I-10 Estimated carryover FY16/17 $15,110,661 IC Improvements $ 71,993,000 $ 2,000,000 2 Cook Street Widening -Phase II Estimated carryover FY16/17 $3,655,500 Street Widening 9,665,500 3,655,500 Street Resurfacing 3 Estimated carryover FY16/17 $3,068,482 Maintenance Project 7,874,163 4,968,482 FY17/18 request $1,900,000 4 Traffic Signal Hardware Upgrades Estimated carryover FY16/17 $320,170 Traffic Signal 520,170 470,170 FY17/18 request $150,000 Maintenance Prog. Citywide Street Striping and Lane 5 Improvements Street Improvements 685,000 685,000 Estimated carryover FY16/17 $385,000 FY17/18 request $300,000 6 Jefferson Street Interchange at 1-10 Estimated carryover FY16/17 $197,500 IC Improvements 312,500 197,500 San Pablo Street Improvements, Hwy 111 7 to Magnesia Falls Complete Streets 3,165,000 3,165,000 FY17/18 request $3,165,000 Project 8 Gerald Ford East of Cook Improvements Estimated carryover FY16/17 $265,000 Street Improvements 265,000 265,000 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications 9 Estimated carryover FY16/17 $85,638 ADA Compliance 170,638 135,638 FY17/18 request $50,000 Bridge Inspection Program 10 Estimated carryover FY16/17 $200,000 Maintenance Project 300,000 300,000 FY17/18 request $100,000 Traffic Signal and Sidewalk Repairs - 11 Nortwest Comer of Cook Street at Frank Sinatra Street Improvements 120,118 120,118 Estimated carryover $120,118 12 Washington Street Traffic Upgrade Project Estimated carryover FY16/17 $150,000 Traffic U Signal 9 Upgrade 150,000 150,000 13 Interconnect System Improvement Project Estimated carryover $293,000 Traffic Signal Interconne 293,000 293,000 Controller Cabinet Assembly Upgrades 14 Program Traffic Signal Maintenan 336,000 141,522 Estimated carryover FY16/17 $29,522 FY17/18 request $112,000 Triple Left Turns at Washington and Fred 15 Waring Street Improvements 250,000 250,000 FY17/18 request $250,000 16 Traffic Signal Modification - Hwy 111 at Parkview / Painter's Path Traffic Signal 50,000 50,000 FY17/18 request $50,000 Improvements TOTALS $ 96,150,089 $ 16,846,930 *Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance is higher than normal because funding for three of the City's ma or projects (Portola Interchange, Cook Street Widening, and Street Resurfacing) was carried over to and expected to be expended in FY 17/18. FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Palm Desert Prepared by: Mark Greenwood, P.E. Phone #: 760-346-0611 Date: May 8, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 5,800,541 Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: 2,713,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 8,513,541 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018 - 2019 1 Cook Street Widening Street Widening $ 9,665,500 $ 2,400,000 2 Street Resurfacing Maintenance Project 3,100,000 1,900,000 3 Traffic Signals -Accessible Pedestrian Program Traffic Signal Upgrade 175,000 175,000 4 Citywide Street Striping and Lane Improvements Maintenance Project 300,000 300,000 5 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications ADA Compliance 75,000 50,000 6 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100,000 100,000 TOTALS $ 13,415,500 $ 4,925,000 FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Palm Desert Prepared by: Mark Greenwood, P.E. Phone #: 760-346-0611 Date: May 8, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 3,588,541 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 2,767,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 6,355,541 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Cook Street Widening - Phase II Street Widening $ 9,665,500 $ 3,000,000 2 Street Resurfacing Maintenance Project 3,100,000 1,900,000 3 Traffic Signal Hardware Upgrades Traffic Signal Upgrade 50,000 50,000 4 Citywide Street Striping and Lane Improvements Maintenance Project 300,000 300,000 5 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications ADA Compliance 75,000 50,000 6 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100,000 100,000 TOTALS $ 13,290,500 $ 5,400,000 FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Palm Desert Prepared by: Mark Greenwood, P.E. Phone #: 760-346-0611 Date: May 8, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 955,541 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 2,822,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 3,777,541 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Street Resurfacing Maintenance Project $ 3,100,000 $ 1,900,000 2 Traffic Signal Hardware Upgrades Traffic Signal Upgrade 50,000 50,000 3 Citywide Street Striping and Lane Improvements Maintenance Project 300,000 300,000 4 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications ADA Compliance 75,000 50,000 5 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100,000 100,000 TOTALS $ 3,625,000 $ 2,400,000 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Palm Desert Prepared by: Mark Greenwood, P.E. Phone #: 760-346-0611 Date: May 8, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,377,541 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 2,878,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 4,255,541 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 1 Street Resurfacing Maintenance Project $ 3,100,000 $ 1,900,000 2 Traffic Signal Hardware Upgrades Traffic Signal Upgrade 50,000 50,000 3 Citywide Street Striping and Lane Improvements Maintenance Project 300,000 300,000 4 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications ADA Compliance 75,000 50,000 5 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance Project 100,000 100,000 TOTALS $ 3,625,000 $ 2,400,000 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Palm Desert Prepared by: Mark Greenwood, P.E. Phone #: 760-346-0611 Date: May 8, 2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Right Turn Lane -Fred Waring Drive to Hwy 111 Street $ 775,000 $ 332,000 11/4/2016 Complete 2 Portola Interchange at 1-10 On-ramp/off ramp contruction 71,993,000 9,000 7/12/2023 In preliminary environmental phase 3 Cook Street Widening Street 9,666,000 - 2020 ongoing 4 Street Resurfacing Maintenance 5,445,000 489,000 9/25/2017 gathering data 5 Traffic Signals - Accessible Maintenance 50,000 9/19/2017 Ongoing (Project combined with Pedestrian Program Traffic Signal Hardware Upgrades) 6 Citywide Street Striping Maintenance 600,000 10/18/2016 FY 16/17 Complete (combine bike and golf cart lane improvements) 7 Jefferson Street Interchange On-ramp/off ramp contruction 312,000 2018 Under construction 8 Gerald Ford East of Cook Roadway 265,000 June 2019 In design Improvements Improvements 9 ADA Curb Ramp Modifications Maintenance 267,000 Sept 2017 In design 10 Bridge Inspection Program Maintenance 200,000 Oct 2018 ongoing 11 LED Indication Replacement Maintenance 150,000 9/19/2017 Program Ongoing (Projects were combined as Traffic Signal Hardware Upgrades) 12 IISNS Upgrades Program Maintenance 225,000 79,000 9/19/2017 13 Interconnect System Improvement Maintenance 293,000 - June 2018 ongoing Project 14 Controller Cabinet Assembly Maintenance 125,000 96,000 Sept 2017 cabinet purchased Upgrades 15 Bike and Golf Cart Lane Street 85,000 9/25/2017 ongoing (combined w/Citywide Improvements Striping) 16 Dinah Shore Drive Street Street 800,000 800,000 6/30/2017 Final stages Improvements 17 Traffic Signal and Sidewalk Repairs Street 120,000 120,000 6/15/2017 under construction Cook Street & Frank Sinatra Drive 18 Washington Street Traffic Upgrade Street 150,000 Aug 2018 ongoing Project TOTALS $ 91,521,000 $ 1,925,000 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF PALM SPRINGS This page left intentionally blank. City of Palm Springs Engineering Services Department 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way • Palm Springs, California 92262 Tel: (760) 322-8380 • Fax: (760) 323-8207 • Web: www.palmspringsca.gov April 10, 2017 Ms. Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-22083 [1\\GC�GON/C� APR 17 2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION RE: Measure "A" Local Street & Road Program City of Palm Springs Annual Five -Year Measure "A" CIP (Fiscal Year 2017/18 - 2021/22) Dear Ms. Trevino: Enclosed, at RCTC's request, is the City of Palm Springs' Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Statement, Project Status Report for CIP Projects in FY 2016/17, and proposed Local Measure "A" Five - Year CIP Plan for fiscal year 2017/2018 through 2021/2022. The City participates in the MSHCP and TUMF programs as required to participate in the Measure "A" Program. If you have any questions, please call me at (760) 322-8380 or Savat Khamphou at (760) 323-8253 ext. 8744. Marcus L. Fuller, MPA, PE, PLS Assistant City Manager/City Engineer cc: file FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Palm Springs (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $1,498,732, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: ��/�l7 , 2017 s� orDavid H. Ready, CITY MANAGER ATTEST: Kathleen D. Hart, INTERIM CITY CLERK RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Palm Springs Prepared by: Marcus Fuller (Revised by Savat Khamphou) Phone #: 760-322-8380 Date: 4/10/2017 (Revised 6/6/2017) FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 8,034,878 FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: 2,006,000 FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: (3,438,000) *Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 6,602,878 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 2,007,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 8,609,878 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 50100 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 500,000 $ 250,000 50120 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance 100,000 100,000 50196 Indian Canyon Dr. UPRR Bridge Widening Road Widening & Bridge Replacement 21,250,000 510,000 50221 S. Palm Canyon Dr. Bridge New Bridge 4,875,000 50,000 50224 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements 250,000 250,000 50225 Annual Asphalt Overlay Road Maintenance 4,000,000 500,000 50229 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement-CVAG Street Improvements 10,000 10,000 50242 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance 50,000 50,000 50244 Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation (Year 2/5 of Monitoring) Bridge Widening/Rehabilitation 5,000,000 15,000 50245 Ramon Road Widening Bridge/Roadway Widening 32,000,000 50,000 50272 Traffic Mgmt Center - Citywide Interconnect Traffic Signal Improvements 2,100,000 176,000 50298 Vista Chino Bridge @ Whitewater River New Bridge 95,000,000 150,000 50312 Pavement Condition Survey Road Maintenance 100,000 100,000 50316 E. Palm Canyon Dr. Bridge @ Palm Canyon Wash Bridge Rehabilitation 9,503,000 100,000 50317 S. Palm Canyon Dr. Bridge @ Tahquitz Creek Bridge Replacement 9,170,000 100,000 50321 Jefferson Street / 1-10 Interchange Expanded Freeway Interchange 50,000,000 400,000 50326 Local Measure A Bond Payment (Year 3 of 7) Road Maintenance 6,800,000 1,102,000 50329 Gene Autry Trail Second Left Turn Lane @ Vista Chino Traffic Improvements 500,000 200,000 50333 San Rafael Widening (Virginia to Indian Canyon Dr.) Street Improvements 4,000,000 50,000 TBD Gene Autry Trail @ UPRR Sand Wall Sand Wall 700,000 100,000 TBD N. Indian Canyon Dr. Widening (18th to 19th Ave.) Road Widening 3,000,000 50,000 TBD Vista Chino at Via Mira!este Traffic Signal New Traffic Signal 650,000 25,000 TBD N. Palm Canyon Dr. at Via Escuela Traffic Signal New Traffic Signal 500,000 25,000 TBD N. Palm Canyon Dr. Pedestrian Crosswalks Pedestrian Improvements 400,000 200,000 TOTALS $ 250,458,000 $ 4,563,000 * Fund Balance is higher than normal due to deferment of the Annual Slurry Seal project and delays due to right of way on the San Rafael Widening. They will either be constucted in the 17/18 fiscal year or funds re -allocated to other projects, reducing the fund balance to normal levels. FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Palm Springs Prepared by: Marcus Fuller (Revised by Savat Khamphou) Phone #: 760-322-8380 Date: 4/10/2017 (Revised 6/6/2017) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 4,046,878 Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: 2,047,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 6,093,878 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 50100 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 800 $ 500 50120 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance 100 100 50196 Indian Canyon Dr. UPRR Bridge Widening Road Widening & Bridge Replacement 21,250 25 50221 S. Palm Canyon Dr. Bridge New Bridge 4,875 250 50224 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements 250 250 50225 Annual Asphalt Overlay Road Maintenance 4,000 500 50229 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement-CVAG Street Improvements 10 10 50242 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance 50 50 50244 Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation (Year 3/5 of Monitoring) Bridge Widening/Rehabilitation 5,000 15 50245 Ramon Road Widening Bridge/Roadway Widening 32,000 50 50298 Vista Chino Bridge @ Whitewater River New Bridge 95,000 150 50316 E. Palm Canyon Dr. Bridge @ Palm Canyon Wash Bridge Rehabilitation 9,503 100 50317 S. Palm Canyon Dr. Bridge @ Tahquitz Creek Bridge Replacement 9,170 100 50326 Local Measure A Bond Payment (Year 4 of 7) Road Maintenance 6,800 1,102 50333 San Rafael Widening (Virginia to Indian Canyon Dr.) Street Improvements 4,000 50 TBD Gene Autry Trail @ UPRR Sand Wall Sand Wall 700 150 TBD N. Indian Canyon Dr. Widening (18th to 19th Ave.) Road Widening 3,000 50 TBD Vista Chino at Via Miraleste Traffic Signal New Traaffic Signal 650 300 TBD N. Palm Canyon Dr. at Via Escuela Traffic Signal New Traffic Signal 500 200 TOTALS 197,658,000 3,952,000 FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Palm Springs Prepared by: Marcus Fuller (Revised by Savat Khamphou) Phone #: 760-322-8380 Date: 4/10/2017 (Revised 6/6/2017) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 2,141, 878 2,088,000 4,229,878 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 50100 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 500 $ 250 50196 Indian Canyon Dr. UPRR Bridge Widening Road Widening & Bridge Replacement 21,250 25 50225 Annual Asphalt Overlay Road Maintenance 4,000 500 50229 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement-CVAG Street Improvements 10 10 50242 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance 50 50 50244 Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation (Year 4/5 of Monitoring) Bridge Widening/Rehabilitation 5,000 15 50245 Ramon Road Widening Bridge/Roadway Widening 32,000 730 50298 Vista Chino Bridge @ Whitewater River New Bridge 95,000 50 50316 E. Palm Canyon Dr. Bridge @ Palm Canyon Wash Bridge Rehabilitation 9,503 50 50317 S. Palm Canyon Dr. Bridge @ Tahquitz Creek Bridge Replacement 9,170 50 50326 Local Measure A Bond Payment (Year 5 of 7) Road Maintenance 6,800 1,102 TOTALS 183,283,000 2,832,000 FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Palm Springs Prepared by: Marcus Fuller (Revised by Savat Khamphou) Phone #: 760-322-8380 Date: 4/10/2017 (Revised 6/6/2017) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: 1,397,878 2,130,000 3,527,878 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 50229 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement-CVAG Street Improvements $ 10 $ 10 50244 Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation (Year 5/5 of Monitoring) Bridge Widening/Rehabilitation 5,000 15 50298 Vista Chino Bridge @ Whitewater River New Bridge 95,000 2,311 50326 Local Measure A Bond Payment (Year 6 of 7) Road Maintenance 6,800 1,102 TOTALS 106,810,000 3,438,000 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Palm Springs Prepared by: Marcus Fuller (Revised by Savat Khamphou) Phone #: 760-322-8380 Date: 4/10/2017 (Revised 6/6/2017) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 89,878 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 2,173,000 Estimated Measure AAvailable for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 2,262,878 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 50100 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 800 $ 500 50225 Annual Asphalt Overlay Road Maintenance 4,000 500 50229 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement-CVAG Street Improvements 10 10 50242 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance 50 50 50326 Local Measure A Bond Payment (Year 7 of 7) Road Maintenance 6,800 1,102 TOTALS 11,660,000 2,162,000 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Palm Springs Prepared by: Marcus Fuller (Revised by Savat Khamphou) Phone #: 760-322-8380 Date: 4/10/2017 (Revised 6/6/2017) Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 50100 Annual Slurry Seal Road Maintenance $ 2,819 $ 783 January 2017 Completed 50120 Bridge Repairs Bridge Maintenance 100 - December 2017 Design 50196 Indian Canyon Dr. UPRR Bridge Widening Road Widening & Bridge Replacement 21,250 5 December 2022 Design, R/W Phase 50221 S. Palm Canyon Dr. Bridge New Bridge 4,875 1 December 2020 Design, R/W Phase 50224 Traffic Safety Projects Traffic Improvements 100 45 December 2017 Design 50225 Annual Asphalt Overlay Road Maintenance 920 898 June 2017 Construction 50229 Mid -Valley Parkway Reimbursement-CVAG Street Improvements 10 10 On -Going On -Going 50242 Curb & Gutter Repair Road Maintenance 50 - December 2017 Design 50244 Bogert Trail Bridge Rehabilitation Bridge Widening & Rehabilitation 5,000 5 March 2016 Post Construction 50245 Ramon Road Widening Bridge/Roadway Widening 32,000 48 December 2021 Design, R/W Phase 50272 Traffic Mgmt Center- Citywide Interconnect Traffic Signal Improvements 2,100 15 June 2017 Construction 50290 Agua Caliente Museum Roadway/Hermosa Dr. Roadway Improvements 1,300 193 January 2017 Completed 50298 Vista Chino Bridge @ Whitewater River New Bridge 95,000 1 December 2022 Design, R/W Phase 50307 Date Palm Drive / 1-10 Interchange Expanded Freeway Interchange 16,800 - May 2014 Completed 50312 Pavement Condition Survey Road Maintenance 100 - On Hold On Hold 50316 E. Palm Canyon Dr. Bridge @ Palm Canyon Wash Bridge Rehabilitation 9,503 15 December 2020 Environmental Phase 50317 S. Palm Canyon Dr. Bridge @ Tahquitz Creek Bridge Replacement 9,170 100 December 2020 Environmental Phase 50321 Jefferson Street / 1-10 Interchange Expanded Freeway Interchange 50,000 50 December 2017 Construction 50322 Ramon Road Pavement Rehabilitation Road Maintenance 800 41 May 2016 Completed 50326 Local Measure A Bond Payment Road Maintenance 6,800 1,102 Year 2 of 7 Year 2 of 7 50329 Gene Autry Trail Second Left Turn Lane @ Vista Chino Traffic Improvements 500 42 December 2018 Environmental Phase 50333 San Rafael Widening (Virginia to Indian Canyon Dr.) Street Improvements 4,000 82 December 2019 Environmental Phase TBD Gene Autry Trail @ UPRR Sand Wall Sand Wall 700 - December 2019 Preliminary Funding 60076 Farrell Drive at Vista Chino Right Turn Lane Traffic Improvements 505 2 March 2016 Completed TOTALS $ 264,402 $ 3,438 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF PERRIS This page left intentionally blank. CITY OF PERRIS HABIB MOTLAGH, CITY ENGINEER May 2, 2017 Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attn.: Lorelle Moe -Luna Re: FY 2017-2022 Measure "A" Improvement Plan Enclosed, please find City of Perris proposed 5-year capital improvement plan. Also enclosed, please find an exhibit depicting the status of the currently adopted 5-year plan and the MOE prepared by the Finance Department and signed by the City Manager. Please call if you have any questions or require additional information. City Engineer Cc: Richard Belmudez, City Manager Jennifer Erwin, Assistant Finance Director DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING 24 S. "D" STREET, SUITE 100, PERRIS, CA 92570 TEL.: (951) 943-6504 - FAX: 1951) 943-8416 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned hereby agrees and certifies for the City of Perris that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $1,218,470, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the City of Perris shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the City of Perris for local transportation purposes. The City of Perris hereby acknowledges that the failure of the City of Perris to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the City of Perris commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: 11 al ot , 2017 1,l ichard Belmudez y Manager ATTEST: 0-We(\ At\ -- Darren Madkin, Interim Assistant City Manager RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Perris Page 1 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 4/28/2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Rehab $ 1,050,000 $ 850,000 On -Going On -Going 2 Murrieta Road & Bridge Widening 317,000 54,000 April 2017 Project Complete Improvements 3 Goetz Road Improvements Widening & Pavement 120,000 85,000 2019 Design Underway Rehab 4 Annual Pothole Repairs Pavement Maintenance 150,000 150,000 On -going On -Going 5 Perris Blvd Widening (1-215 Bridge to 4th St) Widening, Right -of -Way 350,000 30,000 2018 Project Advertised for Bid 6 Nuevo Road Bridge New Bridge & 200,000 - 2019 Design Underway Pavement TOTALS $ 2,187,000 $ 1,169,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Perris Page 2 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 4/28/2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 4,619,607 FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: 1,446,000 FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: (1,169,000) *Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 4,896,607 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 1,476,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 6,372,607 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance $ 2,250,000 $ 2,000,000 2 Goetz Road Improvements Widening & Pavement 1,000,000 100,000 Rehab 3 Annual Pothole Repair Pavement Maintenance 100,000 100,000 4 Perris Blvd Widening Widening & Pavement 6,000,000 500,000 Rehab 5 Unpaved Street & Alleys New Pavement 210,000 200,000 6 Sidewalk/Bike Path Install (CDBG) Widening & Pedestrian 325,000 75,000 Improvements 7 Ramona Exwy Pavement Rehab Pavement Maintenance 500,000 500,000 8 Annual 1-215 Maintenance (Landscape) Landscape Maintenance 25,000 25,000 TOTALS $ 10,410,000 $ 3,500,000 'Fund Balance is higher than normal due to delays in FY16/17 with the Goetz Rd Improvements, Perris Blvd Widening, and Nuevo Rd Bridge projects. Construction for these projects are planned to move forward in FY17/18 and the Measure A fund balance will be reduced to normal levels. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Perris Page 3 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 4/28/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 2,872,607 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: 1,506,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 4,378,607 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance $ 1,500,000 $ 900,000 2 Goetz Rd Improvements Widening & 4,000,000 300,000 Pavement Rehab 3 Ramona Exwy Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 500,000 500,000 4 Annual Pothole Repair Pavement Maintenance 100,000 100,000 5 Nuevo Rd Widening & Bridge Widening & 5,000,000 500,000 Pavement Rehab 6 Ethanac Road Improvements Widening & 6,000,000 500,000 Pavement Rehab TOTALS $ 17,100,000 $ 2,800,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Perris Page 4 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 4/28/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,578,607 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 1,536,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 3,114,607 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance $ 1,500,000 $ 900,000 2 Annual Pothole Pavement Maintenance 100,000 100,000 3 Nuevo Rd Widening & Pavement 2,000,000 500,000 (Redlands to Murrieta Rd) Rehab 4 Placentia Ave Widening Widening & Pavement 2,500,000 500,000 (1-215 to Perris Blvd) Rehab 5 Perris Blvd (City Limits) Widening & Pavement 1,500,000 500,000 Rehab TOTALS $ 7,600,000 $ 2,500,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Perris Page 5 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 4/28/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 614,607 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 1,567,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 2,181,607 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance $ 1,500,000 $ 900,000 2 Annual Pothole Repair Pavement Maintenance 100,000 100,000 3 Downtown Streets Pavement Maintenance 1,500,000 500,000 TOTALS $ 3,100,000 $ 1,500,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Perris Page 6 of 6 Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: 4/28/2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 681,607 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 1,598,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 2,279,607 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 1 Annual Slurry Seal & Overlay Pavement Maintenance $ 2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 2 Annual Pothole Repair Pavement Maintenance 100,000 100,000 TOTALS $ 2,100,000 $ 1,600,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE This page left intentionally blank. May 15, 2017 Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside County Regional Complex, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Re: FY 2018-2022 Measure "A" Local Street and Roads Capital Improvement Plan Dear Ms. Trevino: Attached are the Local Streets and Roads Program for Measure "A" Funds for FY 2018- 2022, project status report for prior year Plan (FY 2016/2017) and the FY 2017/2018 Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement. The City's maintenance of effort for FY 2017/2018 is $1,385,411, which exceeds our established maintenance of effort requirement of $674,811. The City's five-year Capital Improvement Program totals $43,082,000 and identifies Measure "A" local funds for the five-year plan totaling $7,374,000. The Measure A Fund Balance is projected to be $155,897 as a result of the 5-year Program. The City currently carries a balance of approximately $2,982,867 in the Measure "A" Local Fund account. Therefore, with current and projected future allocations, adequate funds appear to be available for the plan. Attached is the City's status report for our prior year Plan FYE June 30, 2017. Please feel free to call me at (760) 770-3224 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Mark W. Samb Director of Public Works Enclosures: Measure "A" FY 2018-2022 Capital Improvement Plan Project Status Report FY 2016/2017 FY 2017/2018 MOE Certification Statement ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FINANCE I -LOUSING PUBLIC LIBRARY PUBLIC WORKS Tel.1.760.324.4511 Tel.1.760.324.4511 Tel. 1.760.770.3207 Tef.1.760.770.3210 Tel. 1.760.341.7323 Tel 1.760,770,3224 Fax.1.760.324.8830 Fax.1.760.202.4792 Fax.1.760.324.0528 Fax.1.760.324.1617 Fax.1.760.341.5213 Fax.1.760.770.3261 69-825 HIGHWAY WAY 111 / RAr1CF10 MIRAGE, CA 92270 www.RanchoMirageCA,gov www,RelaxRanchoMirage.com City of Rancho Mirage Department of Public Works Maintenance of Effort — Measure "A" Fiscal Year 2015-2016 General Fund Expenditures 101 3100 Engineering 7100, 7200 Salaries and Benefits $395,603 (30% of $1,318,679) 7460 Inspections $7,500 (50% of $15,000) 7623, 7624 Vehicle Operations/Maintenance $2,350 (50% of $4,700) 7800, 7803 Mileage $90 (30% of $300) 7806 Meetings & Travel $3,500 (50% of $7,000) 7818 Dues & Subscriptions $750 (50% of $1,500) 7839 Reproduction & Printing $50 (50% of $100) 8000 Supplies $2,000 (50% of $4,000) 8020 Uniforms $300 (50% of $600) Sub Total: $412,143 101 3200 Street Maintenance 7100, 7200 Salaries and Benefits $579,448 7120 Overtime $27,500 7444 Temporary Agency Services $0 7603, 7606 Utilities $26,000 7617-7621 Street Related Maintenance $235,000 7623, 7624, 7634, Vehicle Operations/Maintenance $54,500 7800 7806-7818 Meetings & Travel/Dues & Subscriptions $6,820 8000-8024 Maintenance Supplies/Small $44,000 Tools/Uniforms/Traffic Control Supplies Sub Total: $973, 268 MOE Grand Total: $1,385,411 FY 2017/1 S MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Rancho Mirage (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $674,811, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: MOE9 ��' , 2017 CITY MANAGER ATTEST: n 5/k/1_0 %9- -SECRETARY iN C. e.v- City of Rancho Mirage Department of Public Works Maintenance of Effort — Measure "A" Fiscal Year 2015-2016 General Fund Expenditures 101 3100 Engineering 7100, 7200 Salaries and Benefits $395,603 (30% of $1,318,679) 7460 Inspections $7,500 (50% of $15,000) 7623, 7624 Vehicle Operations/Maintenance $2,350 (50% of $4,700) 7800, 7803 Mileage $90 (30% of $300) 7806 Meetings & Travel $3,500 (50% of $7,000) 7818 Dues & Subscriptions $750 (50% of $1,500) 7839 Reproduction & Printing $50 (50% of $100) 8000 Supplies $2,000 (50% of $4,000) 8020 Uniforms $300 (50% of $600) Sub Total: $412,143 101 3200 Street Maintenance 7100, 7200 Salaries and Benefits $579,448 7120 Overtime $27,500 7444 Temporary Agency Services $0 7603, 7606 Utilities $26,000 7617-7621 Street Related Maintenance $235,000 7623, 7624, 7634, Vehicle Operations/Maintenance $54,500 7800 7806-7818 Meetings & Travel/Dues & Subscriptions $6,820 8000-8024 Maintenance Supplies/Small $44,000 Tools/UniformslTraffic Control Supplies Sub Total. $973, 268 MOE Grand Total: $1,385,411 EXPENDITURE ACTIVITY DETAIL For Fiscal Years 2017.2018 and 2018-2019 FUND 101- GENERAL FOND DIVISION 3100 ENGINEERING REQUESTED REQUESTED ACCT ACCOUNT JUSTIFICATION FOR NY2015-16 FY2016-17 FY2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 NO. NAME STAFF REQUESTS ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE AMOUNT AMOUNT 7100 Salaries - Director of Public Works $ 168,956 $ 172,880 Full Time Senior Public Works Manager 108,661 115,806 City Engineer 159,450 161,842 Senior Civil Engineer 137,739 139,805 Associate Civil Engineer 86,953 92,670 Project Manager 72,627 77,403 Public Works Inspector 93,227 94,625 Engineering Technician II 80,802 82,014 Office Assistant Ill 60,095 60,996 TOTAL $ 840,661 $ 885,361 $ 890,000 $ 968,512 $ 998,042 7120 Overtime Public Works Inspector performing early inspections in order to maintain quality control offsite/onsite construction. Also ensure projects are properly closed at the end of the day. TOTAL $ 405 $ S00 $ $ 7200 Benefits Benefits paid by City including group insurance, retirement and other benefits. $ 350,167 $ 380,626 TOTAL $ 266,994 $ 305,510 $ 310,000 $ 350,167 $ 380,626 7400 Professional/ 1) Traffic engineering consulting services as needed. Technical 2) Plan checking services, special engineering studies, traffic counts, speed surveys, and software services. $ 15,000 S 15,000 TOTAL $ 1,680 $ 80,000 $ 10,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 7460 Inspections Provides special inspections and testing in areas where greater expertise is required and supplementary inspector when City Inspector is absent. TOTAL $ 10,671 $ 15,000 $ 25,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 7623 Vehicle Fuel Fuel for Public Works Inspector's vehicle. TOTAL $ 1,787 $ 3,500 $ 3,000 $ 3,500 $ 3,500 $ 3,500 $ 3,500 7624 Vehicle Maintenance for the Public Works Inspector's vehicle. Maintenance TOTAL S 938 $ 1,800 s 500 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 EXPENDITURE ACTIVITY DETAIL For Fiscal Years 2017.2018 and 2018.2019 FUND 101- GENERAL FUND DIVISION 3100 - ENGINEERING REQUESTED REQUESTED ACCT ACCOUNT JUSTIFICATION FOR F'Y,2015-16 F'Y2016-17 FY2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 NO. NAME STAFF REQUESTS ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE AMOUNT AMOUNT 7800 Mileage Reimbursement for job -related mileage. TOTAL $ 294 $ $ 300 $ 300 200 $ 425 $ 300 $ 300 7806 Meetings, Attendance at conferences, workshops, technical training sessions and Training & continuing education classes in conjunction with job responsibilities or to Travel obtain/maintain certifications, licenses, notary commissions, registrations and the like. $ 7,000 $ 7,000 TOTAL $ 5,164 $ 8,000 $ 5,500 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 7818 Dues & Annual dues for American Public Works Association, Construction Subscriptions Management Association of America, Project Management Institute, American Society of Civil Engineers, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Notary Public, First American Data Tree, technical publications, certifications and registrations. TOTAL $ 1,393 $ 3,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 7839 Reproduction & Printing specifications, plans, special prints, etc. Printing TOTAL $ $ 100 $ 300 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 8000 Supplies Office supplies, print paper, delivery services for plan checks, training videos, and film. $ 4,000 $ 4,000 TOTAL $ 3,113 $ 4,000 $ 4,500 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 8012 Small Tools, Miscellaneous small tools & office equipment as may be necessary. Furniture & $ 400 $ 400 Equipment TOTAL $ 302 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 $ 400 8020 Uniforms Uniforms for Public Works Inspector and safety clothing for Engineering staff. TOTAL $ 620 $ 500 $ $ 600 $ 600 600 $ 600 $ 600 DIVISION TOTAL $ 1,367,278 $ 1,427,268 EXPENDITURE ACTIVITY DETAIL For fiscal Years 2017.2018 and 2018.2019 FUND 101- GENERAL FUND DIVISION 3200 - STREET MAINTENANCE REQUESTED REQUESTED ACCT ACCOUNT JUSTIFICATION FOR FY2015-16 FY2016-17 FY2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 NO_, NAME STAFF REQUESTS ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE' AMOUNT AMOUNT 7100 Salaries - Senior Traffic Signal Technician $ 72,998 $ 75,945 Full Time Traffic Signal Technician I 55,088 58,710 Street Maintenance Worker II 69,568 70,612 Street Maintenance Worker I1 66,255 67,249 Street Maintenance Worker I 63,100 64,047 Street Maintenance Worker I 46,258 48,260 TOTAL $ 452,093 S 431,423 $ 450,000 $ 373,268 $ 384,823 7120 Overtime I) For emergency callouts for traffic accident clean up, traffic control, traffic signals, cleaning debris and fallen tree limbs, placing barricades and warning signs during rainstorms, and completing projects started during regular work hours. 2) On -call Pay $ 27,500 $ 27,500 TOTAL S 33,84o S 24,so0 S 26,500 $ 27,500 $ 27,500 7200 Benefits Benefits paid by City including group insurance, retirement and other benefits. $ 206,180 222,905 TOTAL S 193,454 $ 214,056 $ 200,000 $ 206,180 $ 222,905 7603 Electricity Electricity and maintenance for 91 streetlights throughout the City. $ 21,500 $ 22,000 TOTALS 21,458 $ 17,000 $ 18,000 $ 21,500 $ 22,000 7606 Water Water for street sweeping and dust control. $ 4,500 $ 4,700 TOTAL $ 3,397 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 4,700 7617 Sidewalk/Curb/ City-wide sidewalk , curb and gutter repairs. Gutter $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Maintenance TOTAL S 1,250 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 EXPENDITURE ACTIVITY DETAIL For Fiscal Years 2017.2018 and 2018-2019 FUND 101 GENERA], FEND DIVISION 3200 - STREET MAINTENANCE REQUESTED REQUESTED ACCT ACCOUNT JUSTIFICATION FOR FY2015-16 FY2016-17 FY2016-17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 NO. NAME STAFF REQUESTS ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIMATE AMOUNT AMOUNT 7618 Traffic Signal Electricity for 55 traffic signals, re-lamping, emergency callouts, major Maintenance/ knockdowns and replacement of equipment as necessary, joint cities Electricity maintenance agreement for 15 shared signals. 1) Edison - Signal Electricity 2) I.I.D. - Signal Electricity 3) Traffic Control Equipment Rental 4) Emergency Response for Signal Operations 5) City of Palm Desert - shared maintenance 6) Annual Signal Equipment testing and certificaton 7) Signal coordination services 8) Signal equipment purchases 9) Phone drop lease (AT&T) 10) Traffic signal maintenance 11) Intersection signal painting $ 41,000 $ 41,000 6,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 19,200 19,200 6,000 6,000 9,000 9,000 20,000 20,000 1,000 1,000 50,000 50,000 32,800 32,800 TOTAL $ 177,696 $ 181,700 $ 185,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 7621 Street Related Asphalt, concrete, aggregate base for repairing streets, disposal of old Repairs asphalt and concrete, equipment rental, catch basin repairs, landfill charges for disposal of roadside refuse, and miscellaneous other street repairs as needed. $ 25,000 $ 25,000 TOTAL $ $ 25,000 $ 15,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 7623 Vehicle Fuel Fuel for the Division's vehicles. $ 18,500 $ 19,500 TOTAL $ 13,359 $ 20,000 5 18,000 $ 18,500 $ 19,500 7624 Vehicle Maintenance for the Division's vehicles. $ 29,000 $ 29,000 Maintenance TOTAL $ 25,539 $ 29,000 $ 29,000 $ 29,000 $ 29,000 7627 Graffiti Purchase of supplies for City Street Maintenance and Code Compliance Removal crews and/or contract personnel for graffiti removal and supplies in public right of way. $ 5,000 $ 5,000 TOTAL $ 6,338 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 7630 Trails Contract services for the annual maintenance of the city's multi -use trail Maintenance system. $ 30,500 $ 31,500 TOTAL $ 17,248 $ 28,500 $ 28,500 $ 30,500 $ 31,500 EXPENDITURE ACTIVITY DETAIL For Fiscal Years 2017.2018 and 2018.2019 FUND 101- GENERA. FUND DIVISION 3200 - STREET MAINTENANCE REQUESTED REQUESTED ACCT ACCOUNT JUSTIFICATION FOR FY2015-16 FY2016-17 FY2016.17 FY 2017-18 FY 2018-19 NO. NAME STAFF REQUESTS ACTUAL BUDGET ESTIJWATE AMOUNT AMOUNT 7634 Equipment Maintenance and fuels costs for air compressor, steer skid loader, ford Maintenance & tractor, speed trailers, compactor, cement mixer, arrow board and other Fuel miscellaneous equipment. $ 7,000 $ 7,500 TOTAL S 3,745 $ 6,000 $ 6,500 $ 7,000 $ 7,500 7806 Meetings, Attendance at technical training sessions to obtain/maintain special Training & licenses or certifications; technical seminars related to asphalt and Travel concrete maintenance; traffic classes for Class B licensed drivers; other topical sessions depending on need at the time, such as water quality testing, new laws or regulations for supervisors, etc. TOTAL $ 788 $ $ 6,500 $ 6,500 1,000 $ 3,000 $ 6,500 $ 6,500 7818 Dues & Dues for Maintenance Superintendents Association, American Subscriptions Construction Inspectors Association and technical publications. TOTAL $ 42 $ 100 $ $ 320 $ 320 1ao $ 320 $ 320 8000 Supplies The purchase of silica sand for sandblasting, guardrail material and posts, concrete patch material and other supplies as needed. $ 3,000 $ 3,000 TOTAL $ 1,948 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 8002 Equipment Rental For rental of equipment as needed. $ 5,000 $ 5,000 TOTAL S 15,331 $ 5,000 $ 4,500 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 8003 Street Signs & Purchase of regulatory signs & street marking supplies. Markings $ 25,000 $ 25,000 TOTAL $ 19,441 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 8012 Small Tools, Shovels, chain saw chains, drills and bits, jacks, jack stands, landscape Furniture & tools, signal maintenance tools, mechanic tools, safety equipment, and Equipment miscellaneous special tools as required. $ 5,000 $ 3,500 TOTAL $ 3,263 $ Z500 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 3,500 8020 Uniforms Purchase uniforms, safety clothing, and shoes for all Street Maintenance personnel and Traffic Signal Technician. TOTAL S 3,043 $ $ 4,000 $ 4,000 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 8024 Traffic Control This account provides for the purchase of barricades, both large and small, traffic cones, light board replacement parts, batteries, lights, and rental of traffic control setups. $ 2,000 $ 2,000 TOTAL $ 2,131 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 DIVISION TOTAL $ 1,008,768 $ 1,038,748 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: Rancho Mirage William Enos (760) 770-3224 May 15, 2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: $ 2,666,867 870,000 (430,000) *Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 3,106,867 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 874,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 3,980,867 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays, Pavement Rehab. and striping on various public streets identified by Preventative Maintenance/ Overlay $ 2,700,000 $ 2,500,000 MicroPaver 2 Monterey Avenue Street Improvements- Widening/ 600,000 175,000 Gerald Ford to Dinah Shore (R/W, Const.) Reconstruction 3 Frank Sinatra Bridge at Whitewater Replace Low Water 1,645,000 52,000 Channel (PS&E) Xing 4 Traffic Signal Coordination Grant Design and Construction Traffic Signal Coordination 220,000 20,000 TOTALS $ 5,165,000 $ 2,747,000 Footnote: Balance is >3x Allocation because $2 million Citywide slurry scheduled for FY 16-17 was rescheduled for September 2017. FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: Rancho Mirage Prepared by: William Enos Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 15, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,233,867 Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: 891,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 2,124,867 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018-2019 1 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays, Pavement Rehab and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver. Preventative Maintenance/ Overlay 1,400,000 1,150,000 2 Frank Sinatra Bridge at Whitewater Replace Low Water 3,097,000 97,000 Channel (PSE/Const.) Xing 3 Traffic Signal Coordination Grant Traffic Signal 220,000 20,000 (Construction) Coordination TOTALS $ 4,717,000 $ 1,267,000 FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: Rancho Mirage Prepared by: William Enos Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 15, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 857,867 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 909,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 1,766,867 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays, Pavement Rehab. and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver Preventative Maintenance/ Overlay $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 2 Frank Sinatra Bridge at Whitewater Replace Low Water 30,000,000 460,000 Channel (Construction) Xing TOTALS $ 31,000,000 $ 1,460,000 FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: Rancho Mirage Prepared by: William Enos Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 15, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 306,867 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 927,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 1,233,867 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays, Pavement Rehab and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver Preventative Maintenance/ Overlay $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 1 TOTALS $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: Rancho Mirage Prepared by: William Enos Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 15, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 233,867 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 946,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 1,179,867 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver. Preventative Maintenance/ Overlay $ 1,200,000 $ 900,000 1 TOTALS $ 1,200,000 $ 900,000 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: Rancho Mirage Prepared by: William Enos Phone #: (760) 770-3224 Date: May 15, 2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 2 3 4 Citywide slurry seal, crack seal, AC overlays and AC overlays and striping on various public streets identified by MicroPaver Monterey Avenue Street Imps. Gerald Ford to Dinah Shore (R/W, Const.) Frank Sinatra Bridge at Whitewater Channel (PS&E) Traffic Signal Coordination Grant Design and Construction Preventative Maintenance Widening/ Reconstruction Replace Low Water Xing Traffic Signal Coordination $ 2,000,000 1,200,000 2,100,000 2,000,000 $ 190,000 210,000 30,000 Oct - 17 Sep - 17 June - 20 June - 19 Ongoing -Fall Construction Ongoing - In Construction Ongoing - PS&E authorized, In Final Design Ongoing - Awaiting NEPA clearance TOTALS $ 7,300,000 $ 430,000 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 This page left intentionally blank. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF RIVERSIDE This page left intentionally blank. Public Works Department CITY OF l�lVLf��ID May 4, 2017 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn.: Ms. Lorelle Moe Luna, Senior Management Analyst, Planning and Programming Subject: Measure A Maintenance of Effort, CIP and Project Status Report Enclosed are the City of Riverside's FY 2017/18 Maintenance of Effort Certification Statement, Measure A Local Funds Capital Improvement Program for FY 2017/18 through FY 2021/22 and a status report for FY 2016/17. If you have any questions, please contact Patrick Keeney at (951) 826-2406. ely, Steuer Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments 3900 Main Street • Riverside, CA 92522 • 951.826.5341 • fax 951.826.5542 • www.riversideca.gov FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of Riverside (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $12,449,203, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: April 13, , 2017 CITY MA ATTEST: 44, -- SECRETARY BY* APPRO r AS TO FORM Lip' /..--. Deputy City Attorney Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 4, 2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 18,731 FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: 7,006 FY 2016-17 Project Status Report Expenses: (5,797) Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 19,940 Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: 7,280 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 27,220 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 1 Arlington Ave - Fairhaven to City Limit Traffic Safety Improvements $ 1,313 *550 2 Bike Conflict Zone Improvements Bicycle & Pedestrian Crossing Improvements 156 *34 3 Campbell & Babb Ave Sidewalks Sidewalk Construction 565 *152 4 Canyon Crest Widening - Via Vista to Country Club Street Widening 6,105 650 *1,000 5 Central Ave/UPRR Crossing Improvements Railroad Crossing Improvements 240 *219 6 Central/Canyon Crest/Watkins Bike Lanes Bike Lanes & Pedestrian Crossing Improvements 1,257 *215 7 High Friction Surface & HAWK Signals Street & Pedestrian Signal Improvements 1,293 *195 8 Indiana Widening @ Pierce Street Widening and Improvements 1,115 *420 9 Iowa Ave Railroad Crossing Improvements Railroad Crossing Improvements 380 *280 10 Jurupa Ave Extension - Rutland to Crest New Street Construction 300 *300 11 Jurupa Ave Extension - Van Buren to Rutland New Street Construction 6,247 *1 12 Magnolia Widening - Buchanan to Banbury Street Widening 6,331 *3,207 13 Major Street Rehabilitation Street Resurfacing 4,484 2,400 *2,084 15 Market Street Bridge Replacement City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement 422 *95 Page 1 of 7 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 16 Misc. Railroad Project Management Grade Separations/Quiet Zones 1,372 *440 17 Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement 1,233 100 *284 18 Monroe Rehab - Lincoln to Arlington Street Resurfacing 2,400 *2,400 19 Paving Projects COP - Debt Service** Street Paving 3,000 3,000 20 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Buchanan to Jane Railroad Quiet Zone 17,430 *3 21 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Mission Inn/3rd/Spruce Railroad Quiet Zone 4,020 *20 22 Quiet Zone/BNSF & UPRR - Cridge & Panorama Railroad Quiet Zone 4,458 *2,197 23 Quiet Zone - Perris Valley Line Railroad Quiet Zone 5 *4 24 Quiet Zone/UPRR - Brockton & Palm Railroad Quiet Zone 2,250 728 "140 25 Railroad Grade Separation - Iowa Grade Separation 31,222 "448 26 Railroad Grade Separation - Magnolia Grade Separation 50,917 "1 27 Railroad Grade Separation - Riverside Grade Separation 31,184 *46 28 Railroad Grade Separation - Streeter Grade Separation 33,971 *684 29 10% Measure A Rail Set -Aside Grade Separations/Quiet Zones 7 *7 30 Tyler Widening - Wells to Hole Street Widening and Improvements 11,700 *648 31 Van Buren - Washington to Wood Street Widening 253 *132 32 Arterial Interconnections Traffic Signal Coordination 81 40 *41 33 Magnolia - Buchanan to First Traffic Signal Coordination 2,676 *859 34 Traffic Signal Revisions Traffic Signal Modifications 213 100 *113 Page 2 of 7 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 35 New Traffic Signals - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 274 250 *24 36 University - Chicago to Campus Traffic Signal Coordination 50 *50 37 Protected/Permissive Left Turns Traffic Signal Modifications 125 *108 38 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 39 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 40 Controller Assembly Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 40 40 41 LED Signal Lenses Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 40 40 42 Spread Spectrum Radio Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 10 10 43 Traffic Management Center Traffic Signal Coordination 189 50 "139 44 Traffic Signal Loop Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 35 35 45 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS $ 229,838 $ 25,458 * Indicates estimated prior fiscal years Measure A funding carried over to 7/1/17. **For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. Page 3 of 7 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 4, 2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 1,762 7,426 9,188 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2018-2019 1 Major Street Rehabilitation Street Resurfacing $ 2,400 $ 2,400 2 Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement 1,233 100 3 Paving Projects COP - Debt Service' Street Paving 3,000 3,000 4 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Mission Inn/3rd/Spruce Railroad Quiet Zone 4,020 21 5 Quiet Zone/UPRR - Brockton & Palm Railroad Quiet Zone 2,250 722 6 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision 315 315 7 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 250 250 8 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 9 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 10 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS $ 13,943 $ 7,283 *For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. Page 4 of 7 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 4, 2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,905 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 7,575 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 9,480 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2019-2020 1 Major Street Rehabilitation Street Resurfacing $ 2,400 $ 2,400 2 Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement 1,233 500 3 Paving Projects COP - Debt Service` Street Paving 3,000 3,000 4 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Mission Inn, 3rd & Spruce Railroad Quiet Zone 4,020 758 5 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision 315 315 6 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 250 250 7 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 8 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 9 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS $ 11,693 $ 7,698 *For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. Page 5 of 7 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 4, 2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 1,782 7,727 9,509 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2020-2021 1 Major Street Rehabilitation Street Resurfacing $ 2,400 $ 2,400 2 Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement 1,233 500 3 Paving Projects COP - Debt Service* Street Paving 3,000 3,000 4 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Mission Inn, 3rd & Spruce Railroad Quiet Zone 4,020 773 5 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision 315 315 6 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 250 250 7 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 8 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 9 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS $ 11,693 $ 7,713 *For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. Page 6 of 7 Agency: City of Riverside Prepared by: Patrick M. Keeney Phone #: (951) 826-2406 Date: May 4, 2017 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,796 Estimated FY 2021-20221 Measure A Allocation: 7,882 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 9,678 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2021-2022 1 Major Street Rehabilitation Street Resurfacing $ 2,400 $ 2,400 2 Market Street Bridge Replacement City Contribution for County Bridge Replacement 422 322 3 Paving Projects COP - Debt Service* Street Paving 3,000 3,000 4 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Mission Inn, 3rd & Spruce Railroad Quiet Zone 4,020 788 5 Traffic Signal Improvements Traffic Signal Coordination/Revision 315 315 6 Traffic Signal - Prioritized Locations New Traffic Signal Installation 250 250 7 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 8 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 9 Traffic Planning/Investigation Traffic Engineering 300 300 TOTALS $ 10,882 $ 7,550 *For a more complete list of proposed street projects to be financed from the City of Riverside apportionment of Local Measure A funds, please see the attached Exhibit A. The City reserves the right to update Exhibit A and substitute various street repairs for the ones listed. Page 7 of 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Riverside Page 1 of 4 Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: June 2, 2017 Project No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000'S) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Arlington Ave - Fairhaven to West City Limit Traffic Safety Improvements $ 1,313 $ - 9/30/2018 Design in progress. 2 Arlington Ave Rehab - Van Buren to SR 91 Street Resurfacing 2,050 - N/A Project on hold pending funding availablity. 3 Bike Conflict Zone Improvements Bicycle & Pedestrian Crossing Improvements 156 1 3/24/2017 Construction complete. Project close out in process. 4 Campbell & Babb Ave Sidewalks Sidewalk Construction 565 20 5/21/2017 Construction contract awarded 1/10/17. 5 Canyon Crest Widening -Via Vista/Country Club Street Widening 6,105 - Unknown Project on hold. 6 Central Ave at UPRR Crossing Railroad Crossing Improvements 240 14 7/31/2017 Construction contract awarded 4/11/17. 7 Central/Canyon Crest/Watkins Bike Lanes Bike Lanes/Pedestrian Crossing Improvements 1,257 - 6/30/2018 Design in progress. 8 High Friction Surface & HAWK Signals Street & Pedestrian Signal Improvements 1,293 - 6/30/2018 Design in progress. 9 Indiana - Vallejo to Auto Center Pavement Rehabilitation 3,350 24 6/21/2016 Project is complete. 10 Indiana Widening @ Pierce Street Widening and Improvements 1,115 - August 2012 Pending billing from school district. 11 Iowa Ave Railroad Crossing Improvements Railroad Crossing Improvements 380 93 7/31/2017 Construction contract awarded 4/11/17. 12 Jurupa Extension - Rutland to Crest New Street Construction 300 - Unknown Pending environmental clearance and developer construction schedule. 13 Jurupa Extension - Van Buren to Rutland New Street Construction 6,247 - 2/28/2021 Construction complete. Required environmental mitigation still underway. 14 Magnolia Ave - Buchanan St to Banbury Dr Street Widening and Improvements 6,331 150 3/31/2019 Design in progress. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Riverside Page 2 of 4 Prepared by: Patrick Keeney Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: June 2, 2017 Project No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000'S) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 15 Major Street Rehabilitation 14/15 Street Resurfacing $ 4,080 $ - 2/25/2016 Project is complete. 16 Major Street Rehabilitation Street Resurfacing 2,400 318 6/30/2039 On -going annual expenditure. 17 Market Street Bridge Replacement Bridge Replacement 422 5 6/30/2024 City share for County administered project. 18 Miscelllaneous Railroad Project Management Grade Separations/Quiet Zones 1,372 29 6/30/2039 Ongoing project management. 19 Mission Blvd Bridge Replacement Bridge Replacement 1,233 5 6/30/2022 City share for County administered project. 20 Monroe Rehab - Lincoln to Arlington Street Rehabilitation & Resurfacing 2,400 - 9/30/2018 Design in progress. 21 Paving Projects COP - Debt Serivice Street Paving 3,003 2,250 6/30/2034 Annual debt service. 22 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Buchanan to Jane Quiet Zone for BNSF Railroad 17,430 3 11/17/2016 Quiet Zone went into effect 11/17/16, final billing from BNSF Railroad pending. 23 Quiet Zone/BNSF - Mission Inn/3rd/Spruce Quiet Zone for BNSF Railroad 4,020 - 6/30/2022 Design in progress. 24 Quiet Zone/BNSF/UPRR - Cridge & Panorama Quiet Zone for BNSF & UP Railroads 4,458 35 6/30/2018 Design in progress. 25 Quiet Zone - Perris Valley Line Quiet Zone for Perris Valley Line 5 1 3/2/2017 Ribbon cutting 3/2/17. 26 Quiet Zone/UPRR - Brockton & Palm Quiet Zone for UP Railroad 2,250 22 12/31/2019 Design in progress. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 A,uencr: City of Riverside Page 3 of 4 Prepared by: Patrick Keener Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: June 2, 2017 Project No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000'S) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 27 RR Grade Separation - Iowa Avenue Grade Separation - Iowa @ BNSF $ 31,222 $ - 11/9/2015 Construction complete. Project close out in process. 28 RR Grade Separation - Magnolia Avenue Grade Separation - Magnolia @ UPRR 50,917 6 11/27/2013 Project construction is complete. Close out right-of-way pending. 29 RR Grade Separation - Riverside Avenue Grade Separation - Riverside @ UPRR 31,184 14 3/2/2017 Construction complete. Project close out in process. 30 RR Grade Separation - Streeter Avenue Grade Separation - Streeter @ UPRR 33,971 1 1/25/2017 Construction complete. Project close out in process. 31 10% Measure A Rail Set -Aside Grade Separations 7 - 6/30/2039 For debt service or allocation to specific projects. 32 Tyler Widening - Wells to Hole Street Widening and Improvements 11,700 2,057 5/12/2017 Construction contract awarded in August 2015. 33 Van Buren Blvd. Widening - Indiana to South City Street Widening 26,750 - N/A Project on hold until funding is available. Limit 34 Van Buren Widening - Washington to Wood Street Widening 253 1 6/30/2019 City contribution for County administered project. 35 3rd/Blaine Bike Lanes Street Rehabilitation & Restriping 274 1 4/10/2015 Project is complete. 36 Arterial Interconnections Signal Coordinations 53 12 6/30/2039 On -going annual expenditure. 37 CalTrans Ramps Coordination Signal Coordinations 75 - 6/30/2016 Project is complete. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 A,uencr: City of Riverside Page 4 of 4 Prepared by: Patrick Keener Phone No.: (951) 826-2406 Date: June 2, 2017 Project No. Project Name/Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000'S) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 38 Magnolia - Buchanan to First Signal Coordination $ 2,676 $ 5 9/29/2017 Construction contract awarded 12/20/16. 39 Traffic Signal Revisions Signal Modifications 274 161 6/30/2039 On -going annual expenditure. 40 New Traffic Signals New Traffic Signals 25 1 6/30/2039 On -going annual expenditure. 41 University - Chicago to Campus Signal Coordination 50 - 6/30/2018 Design in progress. Scope change from "Brockton to Campus" to "Chicago to Campus" 42 Protect/Permit Left Turns Signal Modifications 125 17 6/30/2018 Design in progress. Remove "University" as specific location. 43 Transportation Planning Engineering Planning 50 50 6/30/2039 Ongoing annual expenditure. 44 Pavement Management Program Ongoing Annual Expenditure 125 125 6/30/2039 Ongoing annual expenditure. 45 Controller Assembly Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 110 110 6/30/2039 Ongoing annual expenditure. 46 LED Signal Lenses Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 20 20 6/30/2039 Ongoing annual expenditure. 47 Spread Spectrum Radio Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 10 10 6/30/2039 Ongoing annual expenditure. 48 Traffic Management Center Signal Coordination 189 50 6/30/2039 Ongoing annual expenditure. 49 Traffic Signal Loop Replacement Ongoing Traffic Signal Maintenance 35 35 6/30/2039 Ongoing annual expenditure. 50 Traffic Planning/Investigations Traffic Engineering 151 151 6/30/2039 Ongoing annual expenditure. Totals $ 264,021 $ 5,797 This page left intentionally blank. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE This page left intentionally blank. *�00 Juan C. Perez, P.E., T.E Director of Transportation and Land Management COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRAIIVSPORTATIONAND LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY Transportation Department Ms. Lorelle Moe -Luna Planning and Programming Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 S. Lemon St., Third floor Riverside, CA 92501 RE: Measure A Local Streets and Roads Program Dear Ms. Moe -Luna: Patricia Romo, P.E. Director of Transportation May 4, 2017 Attached is the County's five-year program of projects for the County's portion of Measure A funds for Fiscal Year 2018/2022. The County's Transportation Department receives no general funds and no certification of MCE is included. Also attached is a copy of our Fiscal Year 2016/2017 plan with comments addressing project status, project additions and delays. We have scheduled expenditures based on revenue projections. Three reports are attached representing the Western, Coachella Valley and the Palo Verde Valley regions, respectively. These projects are incorporated in the County's proposed Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) which is planned for Board approval. We will inform your agency of any changes that occur to the Measure A program due to future revisions of the County's TIP. If you have any questions concerning this program, please feel free to contact me at (951) 955-6740. Sincerely, � „— Patricia Romo Director of Transportation RKN: attachments cc: Robert Brooks Glenn HigalRoy Null (transmittal only) 4080 Lemon Street, 81 Floor • Riverside, California 92501 • (951) 955-6740 P.O. Box 1090 Riverside, California 92502-1090 • FAX (951) 955-3198 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Western County Region $ x 1,000 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 2,496 FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: $ 5,429 FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: 7,925 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 5,211 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 5,211 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2017-2018 1 CHIP SEAL OF 1ST DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 1,128 298 1 FY17/18 2 CHIP SEAL OF 3RD DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 1,170 425 3 FY17/18 3 CHIP SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 670 267 5 FY17/18 4 1-10 BYPASS: Hargrave St -- Apache Trl Construct road 55,079 150 5 5 SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES Develop Plans of Action for bridges 1,119 50 3 6 SLURRY SEAL OF 1ST DISTRICT ROADS Slurry Seal 2,187 1,873 1 FY17/18 7 SLURRY SEAL OF 2ND DISTRICT ROADS Slurry Seal 228 201 2 FY17/18 8 SLURRY SEAL OF 3RD DISTRICT ROADS Slurry Seal 2,245 1,589 3 FY17/18 9 SLURRY SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT ROADS Slurry Seal 325 318 5 FY17/18 SLURRY SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT ROADS Slurry Seal 592 40 5 FY16/17 TOTALS 64,743 5,211 FY 2017-2018 Page 1 of 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Western County Region Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ x 1,000 $ 5,315 5,315 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2018-2019 1 SLURRY SEAL OF 1ST DISTRICT ROADS FY18/19 Slurry Seal 1,654 1,654 1 2 SLURRY SEAL OF 2ND DISTRICT ROADS FY18/19 Slurry Seal 305 305 2 3 SLURRY SEAL OF 3RD DISTRICT ROADS FY18/19 Slurry Seal 2,412 2,412 3 4 SLURRY SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT ROADS FY18/19 Slurry Seal 944 944 5 TOTALS 5,315 5,315 FY 2018-2019 Page 2 of 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Western County Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: $ 5,421 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 5,421 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2019-2020 1 SLURRY SEAL OF 1ST DISTRICT ROADS FY19/20 Slurry Seal 1,687 1,687 1 2 SLURRY SEAL OF 2ND DISTRICT ROADS FY19/20 Slurry Seal 311 311 2 3 SLURRY SEAL OF 3RD DISTRICT ROADS FY19/20 Slurry Seal 2,460 2,460 3 4 SLURRY SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT ROADS FY19/20 Slurry Seal 963 963 5 TOTALS 5,421 5,421 FY 2019-2020 Page 3 of 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Western County Region Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ x 1,000 $ 5,529 5,529 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2020-2021 1 SLURRY SEAL OF 1ST DISTRICT ROADS FY20/21 Slurry Seal 1,720 1,720 1 2 SLURRY SEAL OF 2ND DISTRICT ROADS FY20/21 Slurry Seal 318 318 2 3 SLURRY SEAL OF 3RD DISTRICT ROADS FY20/21 Slurry Seal 2,509 2,509 3 4 SLURRY SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT ROADS FY20/21 Slurry Seal 982 982 5 TOTALS 5,529 5,529 FY 2020-2021 Page 4 of 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Western County Region Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ x 1,000 $ 5,640 5,640 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2021-2022 1 SLURRY SEAL OF 1ST DISTRICT ROADS FY21 /22 Slurry Seal 1,755 1,755 1 2 SLURRY SEAL OF 2ND DISTRICT ROADS FY21 /22 Slurry Seal 324 324 2 3 SLURRY SEAL OF 3RD DISTRICT ROADS FY21 /22 Slurry Seal 2,559 2,559 3 4 SLURRY SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT ROADS FY21 /22 Slurry Seal 1,002 1,002 5 TOTALS 5,640 5,640 FY 2021-2022 Page 5 of 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Western County Region $ x 1,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status Supv. Dist. 1 BRIGGS RD & BAXTER RD: -- Loan Payback for road improvements built 376 180 Completed 12/21/2016 3 2 CABAZON AREA RESURFACING Resurf AC paved road 1,754 1 FY 18/19 Ongoing design 5 GROUP: 13 Various Streets -- 3 CHIP SEAL OF 1ST DISTRICT Chip seal 730 730 Completed 9/29/2016 1 ROADS FY16/17 4 CHIP SEAL OF 3RD DISTRICT Chip seal 1,514 1,514 Completed 10/20/2016 3 ROADS FY16/17 5 CHIP SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT Chip seal 325 325 Completed 7/21/2016 5 ROADS FY16/17 6 1-10 BYPASS: Hargrave St -- Construct road 55,079 200 FY 21/22 Ongoing design 5 Apache Trl 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY BRIDGE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM: Pursue federal bridge maintenance funds 819 24 June 2017 Ongoing design 3 Various locations Countywide 8 SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES Develop Plans of Action for bridges 1,119 4 June 2017 Ongoing design 3 9 SLURRY SEAL OF 1ST DISTRICT Slurry Seal 1,551 1,491 June 2017 Under Construction 1 ROADS FY16/17 10 SLURRY SEAL OF 2ND DISTRICT Slurry Seal 834 750 June 2018 Under Construction 2 ROADS FY16/17 11 SLURRY SEAL OF 3RD DISTRICT Slurry Seal 1,446 1,382 June 2019 Under Construction 3 ROADS FY16/17 Project Status Report Page 6of7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status Supv. Dist. 12 SLURRY SEAL OF 5TH DISTRICT Slurry Seal 592 547 August 2017 Under Construction 5 ROADS FY16/17 13 MARGARTH ST: S.H. 74 - Marie St Resurf RMS paved road 147 142 Late costs from FY15/16 project 14 MARIE ST: Margarth St - Mapes Rd Resurf RMS paved road 171 166 Late costs from FY15/16 project 15 MOUNTAIN AVE: Theda St - Baxter Resurf RMS paved road 355 307 Late costs from Rd FY15/16 project 16 SOPHIE ST: Mapes Rd - Mountain Resurf RMS paved road 135 130 Late costs from Ave FY15/16 project 17 SOPHIE ST: Mountain Ave - S.H. 74 Resurf RMS paved road 33 32 Late costs from FY15/16 project TOTALS 66,980 7,925 Project Status Report Page 7of7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Coachella Valley Region $ x 1,000 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: $ (915) FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: $ 1,881 FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: 426 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 540 1,743 2,283 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2017-2018 1 66TH AVE: Grant St -- Hayes St Reconst RMS paved road 470 296 4 2 BUCHANAN ST: 62nd Ave -- 2387' S 60th Ave Resurf RMS paved road 363 99 4 3 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 2,010 1,251 4 FY 17/18 COACHELLA VALLEY AREA: various roads -- Resurfacing program in the Coachella Valley 562 562 4 FILLMORE ST : 64th Ave -- 62nd Ave Resurf RMS paved road 270 75 4 TOTALS 3,675 2,283 FY 2017-2018 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Coachella Valley Region Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ x 1,000 $ 1,778 1,778 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2018-2019 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 1,546 1,078 4 FY 18/19 2 COACHELLA VALLEY AREA: various roads -- Resurfacing program in the Coachella Valley 500 500 4 3 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 4 Only -- Pavement Rehab 200 200 4 TOTALS 2,246 1,778 FY 2018-2019 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Coachella Valley Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: $ 1,814 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 1,814 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2019-2020 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 1,603 1,104 4 FY 19/20 2 COACHELLA VALLEY AREA: various roads -- Resurfacing program in the Coachella Valley 510 510 4 3 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 4 Only -- Pavement Rehab 200 200 4 TOTALS 2,313 1,814 FY 2019-2020 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Coachella Valley Region Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ x 1,000 $ 1,850 1,850 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2020-2021 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 1,661 1,125 4 FY 20/21 2 COACHELLA VALLEY AREA: various roads -- Resurfacing program in the Coachella Valley 525 525 4 3 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 4 Only -- Pavement Rehab 200 200 4 TOTALS 2,386 1,850 FY 2020-2021 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Coachella Valley Region Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ x 1,000 $ 1,887 1,887 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2021-2022 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS Chip seal 1,650 1,162 4 FY 21 /22 2 COACHELLA VALLEY AREA: various roads -- Resurfacing program in the Coachella Valley 525 525 4 3 Z* FUTURE PROJECTS: District 4 Only -- Pavement Rehab 200 200 4 TOTALS 2,375 1,887 FY 2021-2022 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Coachella Valley Region $ x 1,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status Supv. Dist. 1 BUCHANAN ST: 62nd Ave -- 2387' Resurf RMS paved road 363 130 August 2017 Start Construction 4 S 60th Ave June 2017 2 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT Chip seal 2,141 975 Completed 12/1/2016 4 ROADS FY16/17 3 FILLMORE ST : 64th Ave -- 62nd Ave Resurf RMS paved road 270 170 August 2017 Construction started, now temporarily suspended 4 4 JACKSON ST: 58th Ave -- Airport Resurf RMS paved road 277 1 Completed 2/6/2017 4 Blvd 4 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS FY15/16 Chip seal 2,410 (850) correction of prior year costs Completed in FY15/16 TOTALS 5,461 426 Project Status Report Page 6of6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Palo Verde Region $ x 1,000 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: $ 263 FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: $ 231 FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: 494 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: $ 189 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 189 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2017-2018 Chip seal 2,010 189 4 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS FY 17/18 TOTALS 2,010 189 FY 2017-2018 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Palo Verde Region Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ x 1,000 193 193 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2018-2019 Chip seal 1,546 193 4 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS FY 18/19 TOTALS 1,546 193 FY 2018-2019 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Palo Verde Region $ x 1,000 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: $ 197 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 197 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2019-2020 Chip seal 1,550 197 4 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS FY 19/20 TOTALS 1,550 197 FY 2019-2020 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Palo Verde Region Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure AAllocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ x 1,000 201 201 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2020-2021 Chip seal 1,661 201 4 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS FY 20/21 TOTALS 1,661 201 FY 2020-2021 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Palo Verde Region Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure AAllocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ x 1,000 205 205 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Supv. Dist. 2021-2022 Chip seal 1,500 205 4 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS FY21 /22 TOTALS 1,500 205 FY 2021-2022 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: Riverside County Prepared by: Roy Null Phone #: 951-955-2057 Date: 5/4/17 Palo Verde Region $ x 1,000 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds Estimated Completion Status Supv. Dist. 1 CHIP SEAL OF 4TH DISTRICT ROADS FY16/17 Chip seal 2,141 494 Mid -June 2017 under construction 4 TOTALS 2,141 494 Project Status Report Page 6of6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF SAN JACINTO This page left intentionally blank. lir' SAN JACINTO May 4, 2017 Theresia Trevino Chief Financial Officer Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Attn: Lorelle Moe -Luna, Senior Management Analyst, Planning and Programming RE: 2018-22 Measure "A" Improvement PIan and 2016-17 Status Report Enclosed please find the City of San Jacinto's proposed 5-year capital improvement plan. Also enclosed is a status report of the currently adopted 5-year plan and the MOE certification. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Please call me at 951-487-7340 or Habib Motlagh at 951-654-3592 if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Thomas Prill Finance Director 595 S. San Jacinto Ave. 1 San Jacinto, CA 92583 1 Ph (951) 654-7337 1 Fax (951) 654-3728 1 www.ci.san-jacinto.ca.us FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the city of San Jacinto (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $156,391, approved by the Commission at its September 14, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: ‘7Lf , 2017 CITY MA ER ATTEST. CITY Of SAN JACINTO FY 2016/17 Construction and Maintenance Expenditures Funding Breakdown Project Expenditures Included in General Ledges ; Total Cost General Fund Meas A Federal State City Funds Other Construction: 1. Active Transportation Program I#16-0021 . S 1,157,000 $ 150,000 $ 657,000 $ 350,000 :S - $ _$ - $ -_i S - $ - .t Maintenance: I. Streets Dept - #010-4150 - offset by Gas Tax, net cost . $ $ 2. Storm Drain Maintenance Dept - 6010-4140 net cost - ' $ 18,609 $ 18,609 r Engineering/Administrative Overhead Not Allocated to asecij'rc Projects: u S P,320 LS 8, 32n Expenditure Totals 1,183,929 $ 176,929 Deductions for Special Consideration (Deductions Must Also Be Included in Project Expenditures Above): Construction: Maintenance: Engineering/Administrative Overhead Not Allocated to Specific Projects: k.___ Deduct Totals Total Project Cost General Fund State Reason Why Project Expenditure Should Be Deducted from MOE $ $ S $ Total GF Expenditures minus Deductions MOE $ 176,929 �'�� RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of San Jacinto Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: April 25, 2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: *Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 3,100 797 (753) $ 3,144 836 $ 3,980 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2017-2018 1 Citywide Pavement Rehab (Including State Pavement Rehab. $ 1,000 $ 650 Street) 2 San Jacinto Avenue Pavement Rehab. Pavement Rehab. 600 160 3 Traffic Control Devices/Studes Traffic Control Improvements 63 30 4 Sanderson Safety (HSIP) Striping & Signing / 1,100 160 Widening 5 Slurry Seal (City Wide) Pavement Rehab. 1,000 1,000 6 ATP II - Bike Lane Pavement Widening Minor Widening 685 30 7 Cottonwood Sidewalk Widening & Sidewalk 550 200 TOTALS $ 4,998 $ 2,230 *NOTE: The accumulation of Measure A funds is due to the City focusing on Federal and State grant projects over the past few years. Beginning in FY 16/17, and as reflected above for FY 17/18, the City is initiating projects that will begin utilizing the majority of Measure A balances available. FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of San Jacinto Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: April 25, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,750 Estimated FY 2018-2019 Measure A Allocation: 853 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018-2019 Projects: $ 2,603 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2018-2019 1 Mountain Avenue (Ramona Exp., east of Lake Pavement Rehab. $ 305 $ 194 Park) 2 Esplanade Avenue Pavement Rehab. (Phase 2) Pavement Rehab. 550 550 3 Ramona Exp., West of Sanderson Rehabilitation 450 450 4 2017 CDBG Street Improvements - City Wide Pavement Rehab. & 500 240 Sidewalk 5 Traffic Safety & Studies Signage & Traffic Report 100 60 TOTALS $ 1,905 $ 1,494 FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of San Jacinto Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: April 25, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 1,109 Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: 870 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 1,979 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2019-2020 1 Ramona Expressway Rehabilitation (City Wide) Pavement Rehab. $ 1,000 $ 700 2 City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehab. & Slurry 750 500 Seal 3 Traffic Studies & Misc. Signage / Calming Reports, Signage & 75 30 Devices Striping TOTALS $ 1,825 $ 1,230 FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of San Jacinto Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: April 25, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 749 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 887 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 1,636 Item No. Project Name I Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2020-2021 1 City Wide Slurry Seal & Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehab. $ 950 $ 750 2 Esplanade Avenue Pavement Rehab. Pavement Rehab. 500 350 3 Miscellaneous Traffic Improvements Traffic Devices, Signage 100 100 TOTALS $ 1,550 $ 1,200 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of San Jacinto Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: April 25, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 436 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 905 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 1,341 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Measure A Funds ($000's) 2021-2022 1 Warren Road Pavement Rehab. & Minor Minor Widening, Pavement $ 800 $ 600 Drainage Rehab. 2 Esplanade Avenue (Warren & State) Widening, Pavement 6,000 700 Rehab. TOTALS $ 6,800 $ 1,300 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of San Jacinto Prepared by: Habib Motlagh Phone #: (951) 943-6504 Date: April 25, 2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/17) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 San Jacinto Avenue (City Wide) Pavement Rehab. $ 600 $ 20 2017 Bid Advertisement 2 Miscellaneous Traffic Control Traffic Improvements 100 22 Ongoing Ongoing 3 City Wide Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehab. 1,000 11 2017/18 Environmental In Process (Downtown Pavement) 4 Esplanade Avenue Pavement Rehab. 1,000 440 2018/19 1st Phase Completed 5 DeAnza Drive Bike Lane 75 75 June 2017 Under Construction 6 Ramona Expressway Pavement Pavement Rehab. 305 - 2018/19 Preliminary Engineering Rehab. Underway * 7 CDBG Downtown Road Improvements - Pavement Rehab. 477 98 July 2017 Construction Underway City Wide * 8 Sanderson Safety Improvements (HSIP Striping/Signage & 1,020 40 2018 Preliminmary Design 8) Misc. Improvements Underway * 9 HSIP Cycle 5 Signal Pedestrian crossing upgrade - City 300 47 August 2017 Construction 90% complete Wide TOTAL $ 3,857 $ 753 ` New projects Project Status Report FY 16-17 Page 6 of 6 This page left intentionally blank. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF TEMECULA This page left intentionally blank. ,City of Temecula Department of Public WoNcs "' 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 ' Y`a;i`� Phone (951 ) 694-641 1 • Fax (951 ) 694-6475 • www.cityoftemecula.org ti�Qptl� May 3, 2017 Lorelle Moe -Luna, Senior Management Analyst Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, California 92501 Re: FY2018-2022 Measure 'A' Local Streets and Roads Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan, MOE Certification and Project Status Report Dear Ms. Moe -Luna; Please accept our submittal of the City of Temecula's Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan for Measure 'A' funds, including our Project Status Report. The City's Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Certification Statement is also enclosed for your review and approval. All of the projects submitted are included in the City's Five -Year Capital Improvement Program, scheduled for approval by City Council at their regular meeting of June 13, 2017. If any changes are incorporated subsequent to this meeting, a revised five-year plan will be submitted to you. If you require any additional information, please contact me at (951) 506-5163. pcerely, RZ Fi---. Patrick Thomas Director of Public Works/City Engineer cc: Jennifer Hennessy - Director of Finance Rudy Graciano — Revenue Manager Pascale Brown — Accounting Manager RACIP DIVISION\ STAFFUuIieT\PUBWKSWeasureA FY2018-22coverltr jc.doc FY 2017/18 MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned agrees and certifies for the City of Temecula (the "Agency") that sales tax transportation funds received pursuant to Ordinance No. 02-001 of the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Measure A") shall be used in compliance with the Commission's Maintenance of Effort Guidelines and a base year amount of $1,431,799, approved by the Commission at its July 13, 2011 meeting, and that the Agency shall not use such funds to replace discretionary local funds previously expended by the Agency for local transportation purposes. The Agency hereby acknowledges that the failure of the Agency to continue such local expenditure shall result in a reduction or loss of Measure A funds. Additionally, the Agency commits to expending Measure A Local Streets and Roads funds for projects listed in the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan as approved by Riverside County Transportation Commission. Dated: May 1. 2017 'L Aaro "dams, City Manager A RandyTohl, City Clerk RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: City of Temecula Prepared by: Julie Tarrant Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 1, 2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $5,163,190 $2,834,000 ($1,670,273) $6,326,917 $2,929,000 $9,255,917 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation $12,764,010 $5,486,124 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include; Striping & Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Facilities $1,820,240 $1,820,240 3 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Winchester Road Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation $1,529,975 $867,274 4 Sidewalks - Old Town Improvement Project Construct Sidewalk Improvements $690,520 $110,000 TOTALS $16,804,745 $8,283,638 FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Temecula Prepared by: Julie Tarrant Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 1, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $972,279 $2,988,000 $3,960,279 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018 - 2019 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program • Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation $3,055,370 $1,181,855 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include; Striping & Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Facilities $1,820,240 $1,820,240 TOTALS $4,875,610 $3,002,095 FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Temecula Prepared by: Julie Tarrant Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 1, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $958,184 $3,048,000 $4,006,184 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation $3,116,212 $1,205,227 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include; Striping & Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Facilities $1,820,240 $1,820,240 TOTALS $4,936,452 $3,025,467 FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Temecula Prepared by: Julie Tarrant Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 1, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $980,717 $3,109,000 $4,089,717 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation $3,178,067 $1,228,862 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include; Striping & Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Facilities $1,820,240 $1,820,240 TOTALS $4,998,307 $3,049,102 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Temecula Prepared by: Julie Tarrant Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 1, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $1,040,615 $3,171,000 $4,211,615 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation $3,240,933 $1,252,744 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include; Striping & Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Facilities $1,820,240 $1,820,240 TOTALS $5,061,173 $3,072,984 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Temecula Prepared by: Julie Tarrant Phone #: (951) 694-6463 Date: May 1, 2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost ($000's) Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended ($000's, 6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Street Reconstruction & Rehabilitation $6,054 $1,160 Annual pavement rehabilitation program On -going annual pavement rehabilition projects 2 Citywide Street Maintenance Program Right -of -Way maintenance and repairs to include; Striping & Stenciling, PCC & AC Repairs, & ROW Maintenance of Drainage Facilities $1,820 $493 Annual right -of- way maintenance On -going annual ROW maintenance projects 3 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Winchester Road (between Ynez Rd & Jefferson Ave) Street Reconstruction &Rehabilitation $1,530 $17 Estimated completion - September 2017 E-76 due to be approved in May 2017. Construction anticipated to begin in September 2017 TOTALS $9,404 $1,670 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS CITY OF WILDOMAR This page left intentionally blank. Timothy Walker, Mayor, District 3 Ben Benoit, Mayor Pro Tem, District 1 Bridgette Moore, Council Member, District 4 Dustin Nigg, Council Member, District 2 Marsha Swanson, Council Member, District 5 Ms. LoreIle Moe -Luna Senior Management Analyst Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Subject: Loose Measure A 5-Year CIP FY 2017/18 to 2021/22 ,o Dear Ms,.Pclioe`Cuna, Please find: 1. Letter Requesting Amendment of FY 2016/17 CIP 2. Five Year CIP for FY 2017/18 — 2021/22 3. Project Status Report for FY 2016/17 The city is not submitting a MOE Certificate because our base is $zero. Thank you for your assistance and oversight with this program. Sincerely, City of Wildo Daniel A. Yk, PE, PLS Assistant Ci Manager Director of Public Works/City Engineer 23873 Clinton Keith Rd, Ste 201 Wildomar, CA 92595 951/677-7751 Phone 951/698-1463 Fax www.CityofWildomar.org RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2017 - 2018 Agency: Prepared by: Phone #: Date: City of Wildomar Dan York 951-677-7751 May 17, 2017 FY 2015-16 Audited Measure A Balance: FY 2016-17 Measure A Revenue: FY 2016-17 Project Status report expenses: Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2017-2018 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2017-2018 Projects: $ 204,405 584,000 (787,070) $ 1,335 604,000 $ 605,335 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2017-2018 1 Public Works Cost Allocation (8%) Interfund Transfer $ 48,320 $ 48,320 2 Accessibility Improvements Pedestrian walks, ramps installation or repairs 5,000 5,000 3 Road Safety Improvements Signs, Stripes, markings remove, replace, install 15,000 15,000 4 Pavement Maintenance/Repair Crack fill, slurry seal, digout repairs Public Work 45,000 45,000 5 City-wide Maintenance maintenance within city right of way 100,000 100,000 5 CIP 0020 Almond Street Sidewalk Pedestrian walks, ramps, signs installation 243,700 71,600 6 CIP 0033 Bundy Shoulder HSIP Shoulder paving, signage and striping Engineering and 528,360 269,100 7 Master Plan of Drainage Mapping to create 200,000 50,000 Citywide drainage plan TOTALS $ 1,185,380 $ 604,020 FY 2017-18 Page 1 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2018 - 2019 Agency: City of Wildomar Prepared by: Dan York Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 17, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2018 - 2019 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2018 - 2019 Projects: $ 1,315 616,000 $ 617,315 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2018 - 2019 1 Public Works Cost Allocation (8%) Interfund Transfer $ 49,280 $ 49,280 2 Accessibility Improvements Pedestrian walks, ramps installation or repairs 20,000 20,000 3 Road Safety Improvements Signs, Stripes, markings remove, replace, install 40,000 40,000 4 Pavement Maintenance/Repair Crack fill, slurry seal, digout repairs Public Work 350,000 350,000 5 City-wide Maintenance maintenance within city right of way 150,000 150,000 TOTALS $ 609,280 $ 609,280 FY 2018-19 Page 2 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2019 - 2020 Agency: City of Wildomar Prepared by: Dan York Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 17, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: Estimated FY 2019-2020 Measure A Allocation: Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2019-2020 Projects: $ 8,035 628,000 $ 636,035 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2019-2020 1 Public Works Cost Allocation (8%) Interfund Transfer $ 50,240 $ 50,240 2 Accessibility Improvements Pedestrian walks, ramps installation or repairs 20,000 20,000 3 Road Safety Improvements Signs, Stripes, markings remove, replace, install 40,000 40,000 4 Pavement Maintenance/Repair Crack fill, slurry seal, digout repairs Public Work 350,000 350,000 5 City-wide Maintenance maintenance within city right of way 150,000 150,000 TOTALS $ 610,240 $ 610,240 FY 2019-20 Page 3 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2020 - 2021 Agency: City of Wildomar Prepared by: Dan York Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 17, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 25,795 Estimated FY 2020-2021 Measure A Allocation: 641,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2020-2021 Projects: $ 666,795 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2020-2021 1 Public Works Cost Allocation (8%) Interfund Transfer $ 51,280 $ 51,280 2 Accessibility Improvements Pedestrian walks, ramps installation or repairs 20,000 20,000 3 Road Safety Improvements Signs, Stripes, markings remove, replace, install 40,000 40,000 4 Pavement Maintenance/Repair Crack fill, slurry seal, digout repairs Public Work 350,000 350,000 5 City-wide Maintenance maintenance within city right of way 150,000 150,000 TOTALS $ 611,280 $ 611,280 FY 2020-21 Page 4 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 2021 - 2022 Agency: City of Wildomar Prepared by: Dan York Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 17, 2017 Estimated Prior Year Measure A Balance: $ 55,515 Estimated FY 2021-2022 Measure A Allocation: 654,000 Estimated Measure A Available for FY 2021-2022 Projects: $ 709,515 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Measure A Funds 2021-2022 1 Public Works Cost Allocation (8%) Interfund Transfer $ 52,320 $ 52,320 2 Accessibility Improvements Pedestrian walks, ramps installation or repairs 20,000 20,000 3 Road Safety Improvements Signs, Stripes, markings remove, replace, install 40,000 40,000 4 Pavement Maintenance/Repair Crack fill, slurry seal, digout repairs Public Work 350,000 350,000 5 City-wide Maintenance maintenance within city right of way 150,000 150,000 TOTALS $ 612,320 $ 612,320 FY 2021-22 Page 5 of 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM PROJECT STATUS REPORT FY 2016-2017 Agency: City of Wildomar Prepared by: Dan York Phone #: 951-677-7751 Date: May 17, 2017 Item No. Project Name / Limits Project Type Total Cost Anticipated Measure A Funds Expended (6/30/2017) Estimated/ Actual Completion Status 1 Accessibilitiy Improvements Sidewalk, ramps, repairs, pedestrian and ADA improvements signs, pavement $ 20,000 $ - annual ongoing defer. funds re- allocated herein 2 Road Safety Improvements markings, safety improvements Remove, repair, crack 40,000 30,000 annual ongoing annual ongoing defer. funds re- 3 Pavement Mainatenance Program fill, slurry seal as needed 325,000 6,000 annual ongoing allocated herein 4 Pavement Repair Program Repair or reconstruct roadways 35,000 - annual ongoing defer. funds re - allocated herein 5 Citywide Maintenance ROW maintenance and repair 882,200 527,000 annual ongoing $50k P.O. Storm Damage; seeking DR4305 reimburse 6 Bundy Cyn Road Safety Improvements Dirt shoulder improvements and signage 528,360 10,000 FY 17/18 ° PSE 100/° 7 Grand Ave & Clinton Keith Bike Lanes Class II and II Bike Paths 1,121,750 FY 17/18 PSE 100% Ave Bike Paths Corydon to Gra8 BM Class II Bike Paths 985,900 - FY 17/18 PSE 100% 9 Grand Ave. Multi Use Trail Design Multipurpose 1,338,700 15,000 FY 17/18 PSE 100% Trail 2 watersheds 10 Master Plan of Drainage Update MDP 200,000 145,000 FY 17/18 remaining to engineer and GIS 11 Public Works Cost Allocation Interfund Transfer 46,720 46,720 annual ongoing reduced to revised FY 16/17 allocation Close out costs from 12 FY 15-16 George Sidewalk Sidewalk construction 900 prior year approved project Close out costs from 13 FY 15-16 Hidden Springs TS Traffic Signal Left Turn 6,450 prior year approved project TOTALS $ 5,523,630 $ 787,070 Project Status Report FY16-17 Page 6 of 6 _ Auim"iiun11111111Ii-1111- 40 YEARS Est. 1976 111 inn IIMEN� Riverside [aunty Transportation Commission Measure A Capital Improvement Plans Local Streets and Roads Fiscal Year 2018-22 Lorelle Moe -Luna Senior Management Analyst Western County: • New Corridors - 11 • Highways - 30% • Public Transit - 12% • Re • ional Arterials - 9% Local Streets & Roads - 29% • Bond Financing - 8% • Economic Development Incentives - 1 Coachella Valley: • State Highways & Regional Arterials — 50% • Local Streets & Roads — 35% • Public Transit — 15% Palo Verde Valley: • Local Streets & Roads — 100% In FY 2018, it is projected that $52.9 million will be available to the local agencies for LSR. Agra.., _�rlgJ� t bo 1. . 1 1i1i i 11.1, 11 Distribution of Measure A LSR Funds Western County Palo Verde Valley Coachella Valley 75% - Proportionate Population 25% - Sales tax revenues generated within each jurisdiction 50% - Proportionate dwelling units 2 50% - Sales tax revenues generated within each jurisdiction Local Streets and Roads Requirements Participate in the respective Council of Governments' Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program Western County agencies must also participate in the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Annually submit aFive-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), project status report of the prior year CIP, and a certification of Maintenance of Effort 40".ltt Est. 1976 qi Riverside (ountyTronsporlolion Commission " Approve the FYs 2017/18  2021/22 Measure A Five -Year CIPs for Local Streets and Roads as submitted by the participating agencies; and " Forward to the Commission for final action. AGENDA ITEM 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Monica Morales, Management Analyst Josefina Clemente, Transit Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Riverside County Public Transportation: Annual Countywide Performance Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Riverside County Public Transportation: Annual Countywide Performance Report (Countywide Report) for Fiscal Year 2015/16. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Transportation funding in the state is governed by the Transportation Development Act (TDA). In order for the Commission to annually approve funding, the TDA requires the Commission to have a formal process in place wherein transit operator productivity and performance is reviewed. Data was compiled and audits of each transit operator, with the exception of the city of Beaumont (Beaumont), have been completed for FY 2015/16. Accordingly, this information becomes the basis for compiling and drafting the Countywide Report, which is intended to meet the TDA requirement, Public Utilities Code (PUC) 99244. DISCUSSION: The Commission has approved goals and objectives for crafting the Countywide Report. These goals and objectives are as follows: 1) The Countywide Report is to be a standalone review of transit service measured via annual audited financial performance. 2) The Countywide Report utilizes farebox recovery as the only mandated metric (PUC 6633.2). 3) The Countywide Report is to also derive additional metrics that allow for a macro discussion of transit performance countywide. 4) The metrics are to be repeatable and deliver consistent results, which provide a baseline year and a recurring snapshot in time over many years. 5) The Countywide Report should possess the capability to be expandable to other modes. Agenda Item 10 195 6) The Countywide Report requires the transit operators to utilize the TransTrack program for the reporting of operator specific performance information for a reliable and consistent pool of data to examine on an as -needed basis. The FY 2015/16 Countywide Report continues a comprehensive performance reporting program for Riverside County with the goal of documenting how public transit funding was spent and the results achieved for the dollars invested. This report is the fourth iteration, with the first report in FY 2012/13. The following represents a high-level recap of the information contained in the report. Farebox Recovery The primary and only state -mandated indicator described in the Countywide Report is farebox recovery ratio. Farebox recovery is the proportion that passenger fares, and other eligible revenues, contribute to the transit program's general operating expenses over and beyond the subsidy provided by the local, state, and federal government. The farebox recovery ratio is extremely useful as a tool for measuring and assessing a transit program's strength. The overall countywide farebox recovery ratio for FY 2015/16 was 22.9 percent, down slightly from the FY 2014/15 of 23.8 percent farebox recovery. It should be noted the FY 2015/16 ratio does not include Beaumont's farebox recovery ratio; since its audit was not completed at the time of this report. This ratio reflects the interaction of operator fare policy, efficiency in the operators' handling of routine expenses, and riders' utilization of the service. While there was a modest increase of $2.6 million in operating expenses, or 2 percent, the additional loss of $270,459, or 1 percent in fares, contributed to the overall decline in farebox. It is good news that each Riverside County public transit operator met or exceeded its minimum state -mandated farebox recovery ratio, however, it will be necessary for each operator to diligently watch operating expenses and ridership. Figure 1 provides a historical view of farebox recovery for the public transit providers in the county of Riverside. Agenda Item 10 196 35% 30% O f0 25% CC N 20% 0/CC x ?o% 0 N 5% u_ LL 0% Ranhing 6e aumont Corona PVVTA City of Riverside Shntine Riverside Transit g ■2413 ■2614 ■2015 R2016 Minimum Farebox RecoAveryenvy Trips Per Capita Trips per capita reflect total transit trips provided in relation to the overall county population. The total population for Riverside County in FY 2015/16 was 2.3 million and the total transit trips provided were 15.78 million. While the Commission did see a small growth in population (less than 1 percent), it also noted a decrease of five percent in all trips over the previous year. Considering all public transit modes of rail, fixed route bus, demand responsive dial -a -ride, and specialized transportation, a trips per capita rate of 6.8 was achieved during FY 2015/16, which is a small decline from 7.2 in the prior reporting period. Transit Related Resources Finally, a big picture perspective of Riverside County's public transportation system can be measured by reviewing the financial resources available to the transit operators. Service in FY 2015/16 increased by 7 percent (vehicle revenue miles) indicating that more transit service was provided in Riverside County. State and local funding resources increased from prior fiscal year by 4 percent, by approximately $72.6 million. This increase in funding was sufficient to cover the total operating increase of two percent for all the transit operators, but as mentioned above under farebox recovery, closely monitoring operations costs in future fiscal years is increasingly important. Should operating costs exceed revenue received, the Commission will need to use reserves in order to fund the transit agencies at existing service levels or transit agencies may be forced to reduce service. Next Steps Generally, the public transit measures reported in the Countywide Report were positive and overall represent good news for the Commission and the operators. Sufficient resources were identified for the level of service provided to support mobility for Riverside County residents. Service is also identified by the Countywide Report as being operated in a cost effective manner although more emphasis can be placed by the operators in addressing increases to ridership and farebox return. Agenda Item 10 197 The above -referenced metrics and conclusions are more fully described in the attached FY 2015/16 Countywide Report. Staff will continue to provide oversight with respect to the data reporting process via the TransTrack system, as well as with the individual operator audits and financial reporting for FY 2016/17. With the continuing flow of data and financial reporting, this report will be updated and presented at the July Commission meeting. Upon receipt of the final Beaumont FY 2015/16 audited financial statements, staff will determine if there are any material changes to the information included in this report that should be reported to the Commission. This item does not have any budgetary impacts to the Commission. Attachment: Riverside County Public Transportation: Annual Countywide Performance Report for Fiscal Year 2015/16 Agenda Item 10 198 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Riverside County Public Transportation: Annual Countywide Performance Report Audit Year FY 2015/2016 June 2017 Prepared by: AMM TRANSIT PLANNING RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 IffRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM ISS EON RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 Table of Contents Introduction to This Report 1 A Context for Public Transportation 1 New Transit Initiatives 2 Perris Valley Line Commences! 2 Federal "Rides to Wellness" Grant Secured for Blythe 2 SunLine "Cap and Trade" Grant Success 3 RCTC Completes 3rd Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan 3 RTA Built Environment Enhancements to Promote Downtown Mobility 4 Performance Reporting Purposes 5 Into the Measures 5 1. Policy and Compliance 5 2. Utilization 8 3. Accessibility and Coverage 10 4. Connectivity 17 5. Resources 17 Summary of How We Are Doing 19 What Do This Year's Indicators Suggest for Riverside County Public Transit? 19 Appendices 22 Appendix A — Definitions, Data Sets, and References 23 Appendix B — Public Transit Trips Provided, All Modes 24 Appendix C — Bus Stop Location Counts by Operators Supporting Table 4 (Transfer Locations) 25 Appendix D — Public Transit Fleet Size Over Four Fiscal Years 29 AmmA PAGE II 200 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION List of Figures and Tables Figure 1— Historical Farebox Expereince - Riverside County Public Transit Providers 7 Figure 2 - Riverside Transit Agency — 74% Population Coverage within % of a Mile 12 Figure 2 — SunLine Transit Agency — 82% Population Coverage within % of a Mile 13 Figure 3 — Corona Cruiser — 73% Population Coverage within % of a Mile 14 Figure 4 — Pass Transit — 92% Population Coverage within % of a Mile 15 Figure 5 — Palo Verde Valley Transit — 90% Population Coverage within % of a Mile 16 Figure 6 — Riverside County Transit Trips by Mode over Six Reporting Periods 20 Figure 7 - Riverside County Transit Trips, Population and Trips Per Capita 20 Table 1 - Countywide Transportation Development Act (TDA), Audited Farebox Recovery FY 15/16 6 Table 2 - Public Transit Trips per Capita 8 Table 3 — Per Capita Trip Rates Contrasted with Other Areas 9 Table 4—Bus and Rail Transfer Location Counts for Riverside County 17 Table 5 — Public Transportation Resources in Riverside County: Commission Allocated State and Local Transit Funding, Vehicles and Vehicles Revenue Miles 18 Table 6 -Summary of County Transit Performance 19 AM M A PAG E I II 201 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 Introduction to This Report This fourth iteration of the RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT, FY 2015/2016 (COUNTYWIDE REPORT) examines the performance of public transportation services of rail, bus, demand response and specialized transportation in Riverside County. The report is written to comply with Public Utilities Code Section 99244 reporting requirements and to develop a meaningful picture of public transportation services across Riverside County for policy makers and others. The COUNTYWIDE REPORT documents capital and operating resources that support public transportation programs within Riverside County. Its performance measures describe how we are improving or sustaining the mobility of Riverside County travelers. Two timeframes are considered: ■ reporting year of FY 2015/2016 audited transit expenditure and performance in five key areas; ■ recent, program year of FY 2016/2017 transit initiatives of import and interest. Together, reporting year performance and program year initiatives describe Riverside County's public transportation investment and its use. A Context for Public Transportation This COUNTYWIDE REPORT encompasses the historic start-up of a new rail service, securing a highly competitive Federal grant and addressing built environment barriers to transit use. In addition, two critical issues outside of the control of the transit operators frame this year's report, suggesting future challenges. First, the funding picture for public transportation is increasingly complex. Even in advance of any changes to the Federal level funding, after a long period of increasing revenues, state and local funding levels are now flat or almost so. State operating funds from the California Transportation Development Act, Local Transportation Act Funds of $76.7 million, State Transit Assistance Funds of $12 million and local Measure A receipts of $16.3 million are flattening, comparable to prior year levels. This represents a significant change from the steady increases to each fund since the 2008/2009 Recession. Although the county's population has continued to grow, at 2.2% between 2014 and 2015, receipts not growing suggests cautious spending. Flat funding and continued population growth strain the ability of RCTC and its transit providers to develop new services or expand the frequency or coverage of existing services. AMMA PAGE 11 202 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION commISSION Secondly, there is early evidence of declining public transit ridership in Riverside County. Although still limited in Riverside County, this emerging trend has presented across the country, and elsewhere in California with many public transit operators seeing significant ridership dips. For Los Angeles County bus and rail ridership declined by 8.9% for FY 16 below prior year levels, despite some increases with the opening of new rail services. Region -wide, other operators have seen declines of 10% to 14% over the prior year.1 Contributing factors are multiple: these include low gasoline prices, an improving economy, a surge in personal automobile purchases and increased access to California drivers' licenses. Declining ridership makes it harder for operators to meet their required minimum TDA mandated farebox standards. It should be noted that of all metrics utilized in this report, farebox recovery is the only legally required standard to be met. Both trends of flat revenue and declining ridership will bear watching and will likely force adjustments in operations and policy as RCTC and its transit providers move forward. New Transit Initiatives Perris Valley Line Commences! The new Perris Valley line commenced service in June 2016, the first extension of the Metrolink network since 1994. The 91/PVL continues Metrolink rail service for an additional 24 miles from the downtown Riverside station to south Perris, with four new stations at Riverside Hunter Park, Moreno Valley/ March Field, Downtown Perris and South Perris. At the end of the first three months of service, ridership was 17% of the entire 91/PVL Metrolink line, moving towards a goal of 24%. There are six in -bound and six out- bound trains on weekdays between South Perris and downtown Riverside. Half of these runs provide a direct, one -seat ride into downtown Los Angeles. There is, as yet, no weekend Metrolink train service from South Perris. Federal "Rides to Wellness" Grant Secured for Blythe --.) RCTC, in partnership with the City of Blythe, sought and successfully won a Federal Transit fil Administration Rides to Wellness Grant, an 18-month pilot project that will provide three - times weekly service between Blythe and Coachella Valley medical facilities 110 miles to the Federal Transit Administration east. The federal grant's goals for the new Blythe Wellness Express are ambitious: ■ to increase access to health care; ■ to improve health outcomes; and 1 SCAG Regional Transit Technical Advisory Committee, March 29, 2017; Transit Ridership Update; pp. 36-39. AM M�A PAGER 203 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 ■ to reduce healthcare costs. The Blythe Wellness Express project was among just 18 successful grantees selected from over 80 applicants across the country. This pilot service, providing trips between Blythe and the Coachella Valley, is a partnership of RCTC, the City of Blythe, the Palo Verde Community Hospital and other local organizations. Service initiates July 5, 2017. SunLine "Cap and Trade" Grant Success RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION com Ni ioN On April 2017, the SunLine Transit Agency was awarded $12.5 million from the California Climate Investments, a statewide initiative funded with proceeds from the State's Cap -and -Trade Program. The initiative's goal is to fund projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions with a portion of funding required to benefit disadvantaged communities. SunLine received funding to purchase five zero -emission hydrogen fuel cell buses and to upgrade a hydrogen -fueling station in the Coachella Valley. New Flyer will build the zero -emission buses while the Hydrogenics Corporation will upgrade the hydrogen fueling station for the agency. SunLine intends to operate these new buses on two routes serving the City of Indio and the unincorporated area of Mecca. These routes cover areas designated as "disadvantaged communities" thus funds will contribute to improved public e health, quality of life, and economic opportunity in this portion of Riverside County. TRANSIT AGENCY RCTC Completes 3rd COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT - HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN During 2016 RCTC undertook a full update of the RIVERSIDE COUNTY COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT -HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN. After an almost year -long public involvement process and outreach to stakeholders across the County, collaborating with each of the RIVERSIDE. County's public transit providers, this 2016 COORDINATED PLAN UPDATE provide a current COUNTY TRANSPORTATION road map for addressing mobility needs of more vulnerable groups —older adults, persons COMMISSION with disabilities, persons of limited income, of limited English proficiency and military veterans. The 2016 PLAN documented a transit and transportation network that has expanded since the 2012 UPDATE. Nonetheless, ten categories of network gaps and areas of unmet need were identified. These were addressed through five mobility goals and twenty-three accompanying strategies to improve mobility to the Plan's target groups: ■ Grow Mobility Options ■ Connect and Coordinate Services ■ Promote Safety and Comfort AM M A TRANSPORTATION COORDINATION 204 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM 155 EON ■ Improve Health Access ■ Promote and Improve Communication This 2016 COORDINATED PLAN will be used to seek funding for: discretionary projects from the FTA Section 5310 program; from other state and federal funding sources as they become available; and to aid the county's transit providers in identifying strategies that improve mobility of the Plan's target groups. RTA Built Environment Enhancements to Promote Downtown Mobility The Downtown Riverside Stop Improvement Project was designed to address the long-term growth in transit service that RTA expects in the upcoming years. The project supports physical changes in the downtown area at key destinations, supporting on -street boarding and transfers throughout downtown, in anticipation of a bus layover location on Vine Street near the Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station. In 2015, RTA initiated the planning and public input project phases. Construction of bus stops and associated improvements was underway between November and March. RTA upgraded a total of 26 bus stops with improvements that include the installation of shelters, benches, trash receptacles, solar lighting, and improved bus route and schedule information. On January 8, 2017, RTA discontinued service to the Riverside Downtown Terminal and implemented its downtown operating plan. A total of ten local and five commuter RTA bus routes, Omnitrans Route 215, and SunLine DOWNTOWN RIVERSIDE STOP MAP 12 ` ti �a Lemon. SKONO Sf_+ � Fir un. x � TFFIR➢5T ' w` 1LL E. - A 00 r I � : E.— FOURTH ST :.7,. s Ft-�,Se+ FIFTH ST g- t %g E = E::: �1,., .. m e ,_ g5tmn --=p-++ rA p MISSION INN AV rc o. � c 4i 8 ' L.� o..� 15 .. a,. - II 3�'�n.v. f �.. n. LNIY9lAlY AV ` UNVERSTIYAV e s :: a Q•p .ei31 Cr:r ,. WHITTIER PL Z ""' N rr.7:6'' 'm NNW! ST F q g NINTH ST g .. [� c i J O ,`` ., R�oacu Pl. TENTH ST iv, ELEVENTH Si i ... 11. y TWELFTH ST O.THIRTEENTH sr Am. -FOURTEENTH ST `� - rm .Nlit tha Al?. Eb„ 1 II sLP •CY - au Pa. G. .. _ 31,1l �, j a 0a �= mm<o � aWr :lthtl. s. f 5E S 1 9 ,10 FN-fFFNIll ST o ° o roP.��..�.�r xaPnw.swP'c*+'a. ,...... co.,.xox Commuter Link 220 travel through the downtown area, enabling convenient access to key destinations in the downtown area through the completion of the bus stop improvement project and new operating plan. AmmA P A G E 14 205 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 illRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Performance Reporting Purposes This fourth RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT, FY 2015/2016, describes the County's transit provider experience in relation to key performance areas. In addition to compliance with governing law, the COUNTYWIDE REPORT Wiii: ■ Present a countywide view of transit performance. ■ Provide a snapshot in time, a benchmark group of measures by which to monitor change. ■ Use outcome -based performance methodologies to comply with PL 114-94 Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) and the California Transportation Development Act. ■ Provide an expandable performance measurement framework. Into the Measures Riverside County public transportation is funded with a mix of federal, state and local dollars. RCTC has responsibility for the programming of federal funding that public transit operators receive and for providing oversight on regulatory compliance. RCTC does not touch these funds as they are forwarded directly to the operators. RCTC is directly responsible for managing the state Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds and Local Measure A receipts. However, the public transit operators in receipt of federal transit funding, including Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5307 and 5311, directly manage their Federal funds, with the exception that RCTC has administrative and operational responsibility for rail funding allocated to Riverside County by the U.S. Dept. of Transportation. This COUNTYWIDE REPORT continues its focus only on the state and local funds received by Riverside County to consider performance indicators in relation to those funds. The measures selected provide a comprehensive picture of performance. Individual provider experience is reported for the measures of: fare box recovery, trips by mode and transit coverage. Two vehicle -related indicators, along with resource indicators of transfer locations, funding, vehicles and vehicle revenue miles, are presented for the three geographic regions of the county - Western Riverside, the Coachella Valley and the Palo Verde Valley. The trips per capita indicator is considered by provider, by region and for the entire county. Appendix A presents the definitions used in this COUNTYWIDE REPORT'S performance measurement. 1. Policy and Compliance This is the only COUNTYWIDE REPORT measure for which there is a regulatory requirement. This measure of the Farebox Recovery Ratio has its basis in existing California law under the Transportation Development Act (TDA). California transit operators much achieve established minimum contributions to operating costs from their riders' fares, called farebox. Section 6633.2 of the TDA statutorily requires minimum contributions from passenger fares to ensure basic efficiencies and protect continued funding of public transit programs receiving Local Transportation Funds (LTF). Expressed as the farebox recovery ratio, AM A PAGEI5 206 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2 01 5/2 01 6 gliRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION standards vary for rural and urban providers to reflect the proportion of total operating costs that must be covered from passenger fares. Table 1 presents the farebox recovery ratios for each Riverside County transit provider who receives TDA Local Transportation Funds for the reporting year 2015/2016. Farebox standards for these state - mandated minimums are 20% for urban transit providers and 10% for rural or demand response -only providers. However, Riverside County has established "blended" minimum standards, approved by Caltrans, that reflect the combined urban and rural proportions of each operators' respective service area. These below-20% required minimums reflect the mix of urban and rural areas each operator serves. Agency farebox recovery ratios: ■ Reflect the interaction of factors that include ridership, agency policy and operating costs; ■ Are heavily influenced by ridership as more riders will generate increased fare revenue while declining ridership will bring down the fare contribution to operating costs; ■ Reflect critical agency policy as transit fares are a key policy area determined by the transit provider; ■ Are influenced by attention to operating costs as systems operating efficiently will have lower expenses with fares representing comparatively higher proportions of total costs, higher farebox ratios. TABLE 1, COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) AUDITED FAREBOX RECOVERY, FY 15/16 Audit Results All Operators COUNTYWIDE BANNING BEAUMONT CORONA PVVTA RIVERSIDE 2015 2016 2016[3] 2016 2016 2016 RTA 2016 SUNLINE COUNTYWIDE 2016 2016 Total Operating Revenue from Passenger Fares [1] Total Operating Expenses, Net Farebox [2] Standard — Minimum Farebox Recovery Requirement, Per TDA and ROTC Adopted Policy Actual — Farebox Recove Ratio/0 erator Meeting Requirement $22,847,887 $96,144,717 No Standard 23.8% $ 224,463 $ 1,663,164 10% 13.5 % Meets v a 0 n a zo $ 454,895 $ 2,242,025 20% 20.3 % $ 123,021 $ 1,017,367 10% 12.1% $ 376,960 $ 3,323,668 10% 11.3 % $ 14,263,722 $ 58,672,060 17.44 24.3% $ 7,134,367 $ 31,617,861 17.80% 22.6% Meets Meets Meets Meets Meets $ 22,577,428 $ 98,536,145 No Standard 22.9 % [1] Per RCTC Policy: Operato s may supplement fare revenues with local funds and suppo t such as Measure A. [2] Net farebox is based upon agency policy, in conformance with TDA rules and RCTC adopted policy. [3] The City of Beaumont has not completed its required annual audit which has resulted in the suspension of payments to the City. The audit also provides the data necessary to calcluate farebox recover in this table. Source: Annual Financial Statements with Independent Auditor's Report For the year Ending June 30, 2016 — All Operators' Final Transit Services Fund, except for Beaumont. Each of the reporting public operators met their fare box standards, although for the City of Beaumont we do not have a current audit. The remaining operators each exceeded their minimum standards, which are 10% for Banning, PVVTA and the City of Riverside and 20% for the City of Corona. The two largest operators, RTA and SunLine, have blended fare box standards just over 17%and each met this with healthy 24.3% and 22.6% fare box recovery ratios respectively. AM M A PAGE 16 207 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION How Are We Doing? To meet farebox recovery standards, the transit providers in Riverside County work continuously to manage policies related to fare, operations and operating costs. Missing data from one provider, in Table 1 above, does not significantly alter the likely declining ridership trend evidenced in declining farebox with a countywide actual of 22.9%versus the prior period's 23.8%farebox recovery. To understand the historical picture, Figure 1 following depicts the farebox recovery ratios over four reporting cycles, for each of the County's public operators. The operator -specific, farebox standard is identified by the red bar in Figure 1. This begins to describe the picture of declining ridership that is reflected in declining farebox receipts. While each of the audited providers met their minimum farebox standards, the future is of concern, as farebox directly reflects ridership levels. Farebox decline was evidenced this year by two providers - PVVTA and RTA. Meeting standards will become increasingly difficult so long as the current trend of declining transit ridership continues. SunLine, benefitting from RCTC's blended farebox policy, was able to increase farebox by adding some new local and eligible funding sources to the farebox pot, even in the face of some ridership decline. Operators are working aggressively to introduce a mix of strategies to attract new ridership, including RTA's focus on its downtown services and SunLine's new marketing campaign and website targeted to younger riders. FIGURE 1, HISTORICAL FARE BOX EXPERIENCE — RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSIT PROVIDERS Farebox Recovery Ratio 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% sus 0% I 1 1 ■1 I I� 'lull Banning Beaumont Corona PVVTA City of Riverside SunLine Riverside Transit Agency ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 ■ 2016 Minimum Farebox Recovery AM M A PAGE17 208 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 2. Utilization illRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has identified trips per capita as a significant measure of the relationship between transit trips taken and population growth. SCAG uses per capita transit trips as a regional performance indicator that has a long history dating back to the 2001 Regional Transportation Plan. For Riverside County and considering all public transportation modes of rail, fixed route, demand response and specialized transportation, this COUNTYWIDE REPORT calculates a trips per capita rate of 6.8 trips per annum per resident. Population during this period grew by 2% but unfortunately the overall number of trips provided declined to just under 15.8 million passenger trips, resulting in a decline in trips per capita from last year's 7.2 to this year's 6.8 measure. As shown in Table 2, rail ridership grew by 2% for the region while fixed route ridership — which accounts for 85% of all ridership - declined by 5%. Demand response services, both Americans with Disabilities Act complementary paratransit services combined with the City of Riverside Dial -a -Ride, are a much smaller mode of service at just 5% of all trips and held steady in ridership, neither growing nor declining. The Specialized Transportation Call program ridership dropped by 23%; largely in Western Riverside, this was the result of termination of Federal funding for the Commuter Link services. RTA was, however, able to continue these important inter -city services with local funding. This is a "win" but also reflects the challenge of projects that must find local funding sources when federal funding ends. TABLE 2, PUBLIC TRANSIT TRIPS PER CAPITA Public Transportation Trips Provided P P Countywide FY 2012/13 Countywide FY 2013/14 Countywide FY 2014/15 Countywide FY 2015/16 Service by Mode Trips Trips Trips Trips % of Total Trips % Change FY 14115 to FY 15116 Rail [1[ 888,844 898,216 1,048,003 1,071,669 6.8% 2% Public Bus, Fixed Route [2] 13,603,825 14,102,821 14,159,311 13,460,620 85.3% -5% Public Demand Response 795,503 823,649 840,811 840,167 5.3% 0% Specialized Transportation/Universal Call Program 559,104 577,736 543,296 416,338 2.6% -23% ALL TRIPS: Including Rail, Public Transit, Measure A, JARC and New Freedom Programs [3] 15,847,276 16,402,422 16,591,421 15,788,794 100% -5% TOTAL POPULATION [4] 2,227,577 2,255,059 2,279,967 2,308,441 Trips per Capita for FY 2015/16 Total Population t41 7.1 7.3 7.3 6.8 Notes: [1] Annualized rail boardings are from average weekday daily boardings at Riverside CountyMetrolink stations with historical FY14/15 totals corrected: Riverside, 91 and IEOC Lines. Reported May 9, 2017. [2] 'Public Bus, Fixed Route' trip counts do not include Specialized Transportation funded fixed route trips. [3] Public transit trips extracted from TransTrack 'Table 2 — SRTP Service Summary' on 4/4/17. Specialized Transit operators reported from Measure A audits. Rail trips reported directly. [4] RCTC Mid -Year Revenue Projections 2016 Agenda: California Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit as of January 1, 2016. AM A PAGE 18 209 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION commISSION Appendix B details ridership by mode and by service, reflecting the changes in ridership over time between modes and among services. How Are We Doing? The trips per capita measure provides insight into levels of public transportation consumption in relation to a transit agency's service area population. That said, Riverside County's public transit operators provide services through a mix of urban, low -density suburban, and rural areas located in this inland desert region of Southern California. Environmental factors, population densities, and the provision of service all influence how many public transit trips are taken - and can be provided - in this vast county. This measure cannot be used to compare the productivity of Riverside County to other transit systems but simply to contrast this county's experience with other providers whose operating characteristics, population, service area size or population density are comparable. Table 3 following presents the trips per capita measure for the three Riverside County transit operators that report to the National Transit Database (NTD). The unlinked passenger trips for the Riverside County transit agencies are as reported in their FY 14/15 audits while peer agency data was directly obtained from the 2015 NTD reporting year. The Table 3 unlinked passenger trips for all transit agencies reflect only trips taken on fixed -route bus service (i.e. motor bus, commuter bus, rapid bus) and do not include trips on rail and other modes these providers operate. TABLE 3 - PER CAPITA TRIP RATES CONTRASTED WITH OTHER AREAS 2015 National Transit Database Motor Bus Statistics Only Service Area Population Unlinked Passenger Trips Trips per Capita Service Area Square Mileage Population per Square Mile (In persons) Riverside Countywide Annual Performance Report \* 2,279,967 13,699,416 6.0 4,499 507 SunLine Transit Agency (from countywide Report) 423,644 4,322,671 10.2 1,120 378 Riverside Transit Agency (from Countywide Report) 1,700,356 8,812,145 5.2 2,725 624 Corona Cruiser (from countywide Report) 160,000 152,728 1.0 41 3,902 NTD Motor Bus Statistics Only King County Department of Transportation, Washington 2,117,125 102,302,980 48.3 2,134 992 Los Angeles County MTA dba Metro 8,626,817 342,979,105 39.8 1,513 5,702 Long Beach Transit 796,609 28,060,212 35.2 98 8,129 Denver Regional Transportation Department, Colorado 2,876,000 76,657,870 26.7 2,340 1,229 Montebello Bus Lines 315,074 7,588,606 24.1 151 2,087 San Diego MTS 2,462,707 54,243,654 22.0 720 3,420 San Mateo County Transit District 737,100 13,467,166 18.3 97 7,599 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority 1,880,876 33,040,872 17.6 346 5,436 Orange County Transit Authority 3,070,485 47,021,445 15.3 465 6,603 Central Florida Transportation Authority (LYNX), Florida 2,005,728 28,497,550 14.2 2,540 790 Sacramento Regional Transit 1,035,779 13,697,260 13.2 231 4,484 Antelope Valley Transit Authority 349,050 3,430,656 9.8 1,200 291 Omnitrans (San Bernardino County) 1,455,086 13,922,152 9.6 463 3,143 North County Transit District, San Diego 849,420 8,030,008 9.5 403 2,108 Victor Valley Transit Authority (San Bernardino County) 334,988 2,013,986 6.0 424 790 Valley Metro, Phoenix, Arizona 3,629,114 17,168,400 4.7 732 4,958 Source: National Transit Database(http://www.ntdprogram.gov/ntdprogram/profiles.htm) NTD Transit Profiles/Transit Agency Searc /2015 \* Source: As documented in this report and inclusive of some NTD-reported data, but including additional data sources. When combined, the Riverside County transit operators who report to the NTD provided 6.0 trips per capita (top line of Table 3) over a combined service area of almost 4,500 square miles. This combined AM A PAGE 19 210 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION cOMMISSION service area is primarily low density, calculated at 507 persons per square mile, akin to somewhat less than the Victor Valley Transit Authority but more than the Antelope Valley Transit Authority service areas. Riverside County's 6.0 indicator of motor bus only trips is indicative of transit service operating in relatively large service areas of low density population. This grows to 6.3 trips per capita when including rail, demand response and specialized transportation unlinked passenger trips. Operators with trips per capita in the range of 10 trips per annum and below serve the areas of Lancaster/Palmdale, San Bernardino Valley, North San Diego County, the Victor Valley and the Phoenix region -wide Valley Metro, all similar in their relatively low population density. 3. Accessibility and Coverage Given the large areas that Riverside County public transportation operators must service, a measure of transit coverage is important. The measure of population coverage as presented is defined in this COUNTYWIDE REPORT as the percentage of residents living within % of a mile of public fixed -route transit service. This population coverage measure excludes dial -a -ride services of which there are several general public demand response programs operating, particularly low -density areas of western Riverside County. This % mile metric is greater than the typical % mile walkable distance that is commonly used by transit planners to measure service accessibility. It suggests transit's sphere of influence as the % mile envelope is consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirement for the provision of complementary paratransit to eligible persons with disabilities. The indicator enumerates total population living within % mile of local fixed route service or with % mile of a commuter express service bus stop, to establish the proportion of total service area population per the 2010 Census Z within that envelope. This accessibility measure presents a "30,000 foot -level" assessment of public transit's fixed route coverage in each service area. It says nothing about the frequency of service available or the days and hours of coverage. Five maps follow depicting each transit provider's service area, current route structures, the population served within % of a mile of the route footprint and the proportion of the service area's total population. This analysis was limited to persons living within Riverside County, related to routes serving at or across Riverside County lines. How Are We Doing? Operators instituted various service structure changes, some extending their service envelope and increasing their population coverage levels while others added service within their existing footprint and therefore did not impact this measure. 2 The 2010 Census population data must be used for this analysis in order to obtain the block level data necessary to identify the percent of the population with % mile access to fixed route public transit. One consequence of this is that the measure is not as sensitive to population changes as, for example, the trips per capita measure which utilizes annual countywide population figures from the California Dept. of Finance. It does, however, reflect service area changes made by the operators over time, as population is held constant. AM M A PAGE' 10 211 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION cOMMISSION Riverside Transit Agency, Figure 2, reports a 74% population coverage level for Western Riverside County's population of 1.7 million. This is unchanging, consistent with prior years' level of coverage. Changes within the RTA network did not impact the overall service footprint and included: ■ the merging of Route 7 with Route 8 in Lake Elsinore ■ combining Routes 31 and 35 for a new Route 31 for more direct weekday service between Hemet, San Jacinto and Moreno Valley without need for a transfer. ■ New Route 26 connects the Orangecrest community of Moreno Valley with Metrolink and the Moreno Valley Mall ■ New Route 52 establishes the new Hunter Park Metrolink to UCR shuttle ■ New Route 54 connects Riverside Downtown with the Metrolink station and downtown Riverside destinations. The SunLine Transit Agency, Figure 3, reports an 82% population coverage level, which is an 8% increase over the 76% population coverall level reported in the first, 2012/2013 COUNTYWIDE REPORT. Current year changes within the network included: ■ new Line 20 connecting Desert Hot Springs and Palm Desert ■ extended service on Lines 80 and 81 to Shadow Hills in Indio ■ extended service on Line 24 in Palm Springs to the Walmart at Ramon Road and San Luis Rey where it connects with Line 32 ■ extended service on Line 90 to west Harrison Street, extending Avenue 52 service in Coachella. ■ extended Lines 91 and 95 to improve service to College of the Desert Mecca/Thermal campus. Corona Transit, Figure 4, with no changes to its route structure, reports a continued 73% population coverage level. Pass Transit, Figure 5, increased from last year's 84% to this year's rate of 92% population coverage level, almost a 10% increase. The City of Beaumont implemented the new Route 136 with weekday service to Calimesa, further extending Pass Transit service. Although Banning made no service changes in this year, it is anticipating some during FY 16/17. Palo Verde Valley Transit, Figure 6, made no changes to their route structure during this reporting year, reflecting a continued 90% population coverage level although initiation of its new Blythe Wellness Express will greatly extend the reach of its public transportation program for Blythe residents. AM M A PAGE' 11 212 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 FIGURE 2 — RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY— 74% POPULATION COVERAGE WITHIN % OF A MILE iffRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Ranch° Cucamonga Ontario San Bernardino Rialto Fontana Colfon -- Redlands Highlancl Population of Riverside Transit Agency {RTA} District Service Area & VVithin 3/4 Mile of RTA Bus Routes i_ Loma Lincla • �_Yucaipa f {_._._._._. -._ _._• ._•_•; Rubicloux�'- `• !—•Lj Loma • � Riverside 1f1°yen° _�� manning — Ilo co t •- Valley � •- ��� J s COn; - � � Ereaumont rac ` Trabuco Canyon Rancho Santa Ma'. n Coto de Caza San Capistrano San Clemente P an. erris �fscinto k _x He -met - • "La�Can%`d-n' �x �Elsinore.4a- 1Vild army ti. a { IAnrri Otarz 11 'IP- RTA Bus Routes Commuter Bus ROLIteS t Valle Vista POPULATION 6-51 52 - 141 293 - S45 546 -1 ,617 142-292 1,618-2.466 Service Area = 1,747,410 (100%) 3/4 Mile Buffer = 1,307,429 (74%) RTA dastictBoundaay Palm Springs Riverside Golanty Bound Yucca I Cathedral City Rancho l'Airage a=rc So,rcE 201Q.U.S. 4smsu8. DEC I0 SF4 Pf f'i__• _ _•_.• fudeff>adofogp Ag.'4a.Sag' t P¢uleObn=5.000_.%of Cartels Om* vr+1hT 3-V mife.buffer= 5M, Eth.m a fad PopulMkreafCertaus Owls wrlhrr aaeife b�ii r'=- 50D. Prolee.ore: IVAD_4953 Sfafe Ptare�C.afi�iae w'± FIF,Si6408 Feet Paundarens adiied bw J_.rorgiarcrf, RTA- GlSWS, Maw 2047 AMMA PAGE I12 213 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 FIGURE 3 — SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY — 82% POPULATION COVERAGE WITHIN % OF A MILE OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION cOMM ISS ION dTr E'er Jacrneo Srare -, .,, Desert Hot Springs L San Bernard, nc Narion al Fares Palm Springs Sunline Bus Routes Commuter Bus Routes Rancho Mirage Cathedrar City a Palm Desert e Population of SunLine Service Area & 3/4 Mile of SunLine Bus Routes La Quinta POPULATION o - 35 243 - 487 35-197 488-1,a19 1 as - 242 1,929 - 2,918 Service Area=422.874 (100%) 314 Mile Buffer=348,151 (82%) 4;7@ Indio N ari on a. oachella Thermal. Rtverslde County 3.14 Mile Buffer Salton, Sea Nrt Feria( Gc uriy AMMA PAGE I13 214 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 FIGURE 4 - CORONA CRUISER - 73% POPULATION COVERAGE WITHIN % OF A MILE IffRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Population of Corona Cruiser & Dial -A -Ride Service Area & within 3/4 Mile of Cruiser Bus Routes I Chino 1 _ - _ ` Norco Riverside F° 1 sG Hills r x i ,,may i 1 w '.' Li s San Bernardino I Riverside - g x Gorara M urrarpal A P,c County ! I County;. »„ s ` ' Aylatian Of - r i, v_ 0 4 POPULATION 0 - 37 189 - 334 i 38- 101 MI 335-679 i 102- 188 - 680 - 1.265 ,t Service Area = 170-964 (100%) 3/4 Mile Buffer = 125.617 (73%) 1 Cruiser Bus Routes 3/4 PalElide r �a AMMA PAGE'14 215 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 FIGURE 5 — PASS TRANSIT — 92% POPULATION COVERAGE WITHIN % OF A MILE OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION C ra 9�o't o n e 3/4 Wile Buffer i` ,Eden N IP a C1 err doll=,��, Brc: 4="ia gJ}ve Population of Pass Transit Service Area & 3/4 Mile of Pass Bus Routes jr r A+. Beaumont Beaumont .Soboba Hot Springs R._.—.—.—.—.—.—.. Riverside County POPULATION U-1Z 1U8-215 19-53 216-445 54 - 1 0-7 446 - 966 Service Area = 54,113 (100%) 314 Mile Buffer = 77,201 (92%) Pass Transit Service Area Data Sal,: cam. 21/1 IethczPakoi»: eg Moo.. within 3+4 rn Mac.. within 3+-41 F.ojection: 14 $Q_y38 'Fixe-tl RoLies Inducle: Pass Transit Bus Routes " Commuter Bus Routes AM�M�A 15 216 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 FIGURE 6 — PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT— 90% POPULATION COVERAGE WITHIN % OF A MILE Population of Palo Verde Valley Transit Service Area & 3/4 Mile of PVVTA Bus Routes Ironwood State Prison FVVrA Service Area Boundary PVVTA Bus Routes 34 h9Tle Suffer POPULATION O- 12 S3- 1s2 13-38 123-4S9 39 - 52 489 - 2,818 Service Area = 16.316 (10C%) 3/4 Mile Buffer = 14,810 (00%) (Note_ /rorhraod State Prbor poptiatrcn of 1.595 has been excluded from these cafcu+atron31 Iz`I - 57 ='L- dic=-_=- �- _ - AMMA e �ri Riverside County v1 zi:` r Mesa Verde .f OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION :iversrare County Pala Verde 'College I Baldwin Senior ,Apartments 1� n -r.-4-117- Casa Encina Ehr e n be rig _ `�4--fir a ey A+elly . 24Y ' Ave grRipley v m La Paz County PAGE'16 217 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 4. Connectivity 115 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION A measure of connectivity is critical for this large county where trip distances often make it necessary to transfer between systems. Transfers between transit routes, modes, systems and corridors exist and reflect a robust transportation network. While riders prefer a one -seat ride and transit systems strive to do that in known corridors of travel, transferring is necessary to accommodate the breadth of trip origins and destinations that exist in a complex and economically healthy county, such as Riverside. TABLE 4 — BUS AND RAIL TRANSFER LOCATION COUNTS FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY Public Transportation Transfer Locations Fixed -Route and Rail Western Coachella Palo Western Coachella Palo Countywide Riverside Valley Verde Countywide Riverside Valley Verde Countywide FY 13/14 County FY 14/15 Valley FY 14/15 County FY 15/16 Valley Totals FY 15/16 # % FY 14/15 [1] [2] FY 14/15 # % FY 15/16 [1] [2] FY 15/16 # Intra-System Bus Intra-County Bus, Within County Regional Bus Transit Between Counties Regional Rail and Inter -City Bus 1,070 85% 1,050 66 5% 106 77 6% 71 42 3% 63 114 20 1,184 82% 1,092 104 20 1,216 84% 7 0 113 8% 85 6 0 91 6% 4 0 75 5% 59 0 0 59 4% 11 1 75 5% 63 11 1 75 5% TOTAL 1,255 100% 1,290 136 21 1,447 100% 1,299 121 21 1,441 100% [1] Reflects RTA and Corona service changes as of May 2016. [2] Reflects SunLine's January 2016 service change. Source: See Appendix C, Bus Stop Location Counts by Operators, for detail by operator. How Are We Doing? Overall there is negligible change in the number of connections across the county. Western Riverside saw some additional intra-system connections. This is coupled with some consolidated routes that removed the need for passengers to transfer for certain long trips within the county. SunLine also tightened and merged some services so that riders wouldn't have to transfer, resulting in some decline in the number of intra-system transfer locations. Appendix D presents the individual detail that supports Table 4 for each provider. 5. Resources Resources presented in Table 5 present a composite picture of public transportation for the three geographic regions of Riverside County to establish a final measurement area. These resources include: 1. State and local funding that support transit services and can match available federal funding; 2. Public transit vehicles by which these programs provide trips; 3. Revenue vehicle miles reflecting the quantities of service provided by public fixed route and demand responsive transit services across each providers' service area. Table 5 also includes two performance indicators reflecting service volumes provided within these large service areas: vehicles per square mile quantifying current fleet size in relation to transit service area size and vehicle revenue miles per square mile. AMMA PAGE117 218 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 115 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TABLE 5 — PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY: COMMISSION ALLOCATED STATE AND LOCAL TRANSIT FUNDING, VEHICLES AND VEHICLES REVENUE MILES Public Transportation Resources, Three Time Periods FY 13-14 FY 14-15 Countywide Countywide Totals Totals FY 15-16 Countywide Totals Change from FY 14/15 State and Local Transit Funding, Excluding all Federal Funds Programmed LTF and Measure A Transit, FY 2015/16, exclusive of state and local rail funding Transit Vehicles (fixed route and paratransit, no taxis) (1] RTA, City of Riverside, Corona, Banning, Beaumont, SunLine, Palo Verde Valley Vehicle Revenue Miles (fixed route and paratransit) [2] RTA, City of Riverside, Corona, Banning, Beaumont, SunLine, Palo Verde Valley Transit Service Area Square Mileage (Total county=7,206) $61,835,874 $69,988,653 484 494 16, 85 6,113 17, 830, 287 4,499 4,499 Western Riverside County Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley $50,266,640 $ 21,521,932 $ 852,425 $ 72,640,997 4% 374 113 8 14,557,378 4,362,449 166,423 2,337 1,120 Measure - Vehicles per Square Mile 0.11 0.11 Measure - Vehicle Revenue Miles Per Square Mile 3,747 3,963 1,042 0.16 0.10 0.01 6,229 3,895 160 495 0% 19,086,249 7% 4,499 0% 0.11 0% 4,242 7% [1] Transit Vehicles: reported directly by operators on April 6, 2017, to RCTC staff. [2] Revenue Miles: extracted from TransTrack'Table 2 — SRTP Service Summary' on April 20, 2017. [3] Square mileage: for total county from U.S. Census Quick Facts; SRTP for SunLine; GIS analysis for RTA presented in Figure 1; for PVVTA presented in Figure 3. How Are We Doing? State and local funding is up only 4%, now $72.6 million in FY 15/16, slowing the rates of increase that have been much more robust in previous years when the region began rebounding from the 2008/2009 Recession. This trend will limit the region's ability to expand its public transportation, bus and rail, network. Fleet size remains essentially constant, at 495 transit vehicles countywide. Some older RTA vehicles were retired during this period and not replaced, now with RTA's substantially new -vehicle fleet that was acquired during the previous two fiscal years. SunLine added a few vehicles to both its fixed route and demand response fleets. The Western Riverside 0.16 vehicles per square mile for its 2,300-square mile service area is somewhat higher than the comparable 0.11 for the Coachella Valley's 1,100- square mile service area, reflecting the larger fleet in Western Riverside although also covering a larger service area. Palo Verde Valley Transit's eight -vehicle fleet, in relation to its 1,042-square mile service area, doesn't yet register on this indicator with a service area that encompasses distances traveled to outlying communities by the PVVTA Rural Rider. Vehicle revenue miles increased by 7%, an encouraging trend and very much to the credit of the transit providers who were able to stretch existing resources farther. This directly increases services — increased frequencies and slightly expanded routes — and is reflected as well in a 7% improvement in the vehicle revenue miles per square mile indicator. AM•M�A PAGE118 219 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 ISIFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION commISSIGH Summary of How We Are Doing In summation, this ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE REPORT presents an encouraging picture of the transportation network serving Riverside County residents related to farebox compliance, service area coverage and increased revenue miles of service provided. The picture is also a sobering one related to flattening income and trends of declining ridership. Table 6 summarizes this year's key markers to contrast with prior reporting year experience. TABLE 6 — SUMMARY OF COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT PERFORMANCE Riverside County Public Transportation Summary of Countywide Performance FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 / chngfrFYr 14/15 Farebox Recovery Ratio 25.5% 23.3% 23.8% 22.9% -4% Total Transit Trips, including Metrolink 15,847,276 16,402,422 16,591,421 15,788,794 -5% Bus only trips 14,958,432 15,504,206 15,543,418 14,717,125 -5% Metrolink only trips 888,844 898,216 1,048,003 1,071,669 2% Transit Trips Per Capita 7.1 7.3 7.3 6.8 -6% Transit Accessibility and Coverage not available 76% 76% 77% 1% Countywide Average 3/4 Mile Population Access to Fixed Route Bus Stop Transfer Connections 1,315 1,255 1,447 1,441 0% Intra-System 88% 85% 82% 84% 3% Intra-County Bus, Within County 3% 5% 8% 6% -19% Regional Bus Transit Between Counties 6% 6% 5% 4% -16% Regional Rail and National Inter -City Bus 3% 3% 5% 5% 55% Transportation Resources State and Local Operating Funds $53,903,436 $61,835,874 $69,988,653 $72,640,997 4% Public Transit Vehicles (Fixed Route and Paratransit) 447 484 494 495 0% Vehicle Revenue Miles (Fixed Route and Paratransit) 16,132,145 16,856,113 17,830,287 19,086,249 7% Square Miles of Transit Service Area 4,887 4,499 4,499 4,499 no change Vehicles Per Square Mile 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.11 0% Vehicle Revenue Miles Per Square Mile 3,301 3,747 3,963 4,242 7% What Do This Year's Indicators Suggest for Riverside County Public Transit? Concerns about Farebox and Ridership Compliance with farebox recovery standards was met and exceeded by each of the reporting providers during this period, but it is notable that for two years in a row there has been a slight decline in the countywide farebox recovery, now 22.9% overall. If there is continued decline in ridership, as has been seen through this year across the country and elsewhere in Southern California, this can begin to have farebox compliance implications. Figure 6 following reflects the current ridership picture and shows the beginning pattern of ridership decline in transit use, after years of steady ridership growth. While rail and demand response transit have AmmA PAGE 119 220 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION comet I SS EON grown slightly or stayed steady, countywide we have seen a 5% decline in transit unlinked passenger trips. As shown in Figure 7 below, this has resulted in a decline in the trips per capita indicator from the steadily increasing to 7.3 and now to this reporting period's 6.8 trips per capita. FIGURE 6, TRANSIT TRIPS BY MODE FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY, OVER SIX REPORTING PERIODS 8000 16000 14000 12000 li N - 10000 on c a soon v 0 6000 3 c Q • a000 2000 0 m FY 05/06 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 ■ Regional Rail Specialized Transportation Public Demand Response Public Bus, Fixed Route FIGURE 7, RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSIT TRIPS, POPULATION AND TRIPS PER CAPITA 19900,000 16, 030,000 13,886,266. 14,030,000 i:.ixlu.lnu 10.030,000 �.41n.ilui 5,0[0.� G.9 n,ouo,onu 2,005,477 2ALU,000 V 15,255,883 r.--_ iCaC?... 16,591,421 15,847,276 15,788,794 17,778 2,227,57 FY 12/15 6.8 4_i 9.0 s,5 an 5 1.0 6.5 br 2,255,059 2,279,967 2,308,441 5.5 Fr 13,'14 Y 14115 ElPassenger Trips =Population -Trips Per Capita 7.0 AMMA PAGE120 221 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 115 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Continued Responsiveness to Customer Needs Despite flattening revenue growth, the County's public transit providers put into place numerous initiatives that are responsive to the mobility needs their consumers confront. New grants were a part of this. The smallest provider, Palo Verde Valley Transit, was successful in securing a competitive Federal grant to meet health access trip needs identified in RCTC's COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT -HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN. SunLine Transit was successful in an equally competitive State Cap and Trade grant, enabling it to continue its leadership in alternate fuel buses and to establish new routes in now unserved areas of the City of Indio and unincorporated Mecca. Additional transit service has been added, instituted by RTA, Banning's PASS Transit service and SunLine to extend existing routes, to interlink routes that reduce passengers' need for transfers and to support new connections to rail services. These added services are reflected in the 7% increase countywide in revenue service miles and in the 1% increase in the service area covered, increasing from 76% to 77% of the county's transit service area population now living within % of a mile of a fixed route transit line or a Commuter Link transit stop. Moving Forward Riverside County's public transit operators are already confronting the challenges the industry faces. These ironically include an increasingly healthy local economy that has decreased the pool of traditionally transit -dependent riders. Moving forward means more initiatives to attract new potential riders by providing fast, convenient and easy -to -use transit services. The increased presence of ride hail services of Uber and Lyft, among others, will further impact mobility choices of Riverside County residents and by extension its public operators in ways that are not yet understood. The transit providers can anticipate the continuing challenge of balancing coverage versus frequency that plays out with such ferocity in the large service area expanses of Riverside County. RCTC's development of the forthcoming LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY during 2017/2018 will need to address these and other challenges to help guide the County's policy makers, transit administrators and residents towards a robust, multi -modal transportation future. AM•M�A PAGE 121 222 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 Appendices RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIGH Appendix A — Definitions, Data Sets and References Appendix B — Public Transportation Trips Provided, All Modes - Six Fiscal Years Appendix C — Bus Stop Location Counts by Operators Supporting Table 4 (Transfer Locations) Appendix D — Public Transit Fleet Size Over Four Years AmmA PAGE 122 223 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 Appendix A — Definitions, Data Sets, and References 115 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Data Element Passenger trips • • • • • • - TransTrack data — extracted from Table 2 — SRTP Service Summary on April 4, 2017. - Metrolink boardings separately calculated from SCRAA data. - One-way passenger boardings of fixed -route, paratransit, deviated fixed -route; - Metrolink boardings at Riverside County stations only. Operating expense FY 2015/16 Annual Financial Statements with Independent Auditor's Report Definition from March 2008 adopted Commission policy, all operating expense object classes exclusive of depreciation and amortization, vehicle lease expense. PUC 99247(a) Fare revenue FY 2015/16 Annual Financial Statements with Independent Auditor's Report - Definition from March 2008 adopted Commission policy: - Fare revenue plus supplemental fare revenues from local support, which may include interest, advertising, etc. as provided for in PUC 6611.3 Transit route structure Active service operating along a fixed- route or deviated fixed -route as of June 30t". GIS shape files for active routes County population data at the block level 2010 US Census - Total county population - Block level data for most current decennial census Transit transfer data: Intra-system Inter -system Inter -county Transfer locations at which routes connect; each location counted only once; counts validated by operator Calculated by each operator, these count each stop -level transfer location one time for each operator, as of June 30, 2016. Vehicle revenue miles TransTrack data — extracted from Table 2 —SRTP Service Summary on April 4, 2017 - Annual revenue service miles as of June 30, 2016 - Or total vehicle service miles, inclusive of deadhead. Square mileage US Census County square mileage Operator service area square mileage reported in NTD Whatever is reported to NTD, by operator. Vehicle revenue hours TransTrack data — extracted from Table 2 — SRTP Service Summary on April 4, 2017 Annual revenue service hours as of June 30, 2016 Accessibility and coverage GIS calculation for Figures 2 thru 6 The methodology used to calculate population within the % mile buffers and service areas is included on each map. Using the local California State Plan Coordinate system with distance units measured in feet, buffer and service area polygons for each set of transit routes were first overlaid on top of the area's 2010 US census blocks. Then, 2010 census population counts for each block intersecting these polygons were applied to the corresponding buffer or service area using an area -ratio calculation. If, for example, only % of the area of a census block fell within the buffer or service area then only % of the population of that census block was applied to it. The sum of all these census block calculations, in turn, comprised the population estimate for the corresponding buffer or service area. AMMA PAGE 123 224 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 Appendix B - Public Transit Trips Provided, All Modes OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION Commission 2007 Coordinated Public Transportation Trips FY 05/06 Provided Plan RCTC Coordinat FY 11/12 d Plan RCTC's Annual Report FY 12/13 RL'TP% Annual Report FY 13/14 ROTC%Annual Report FY 14/15 RCTC's Annual Report FY 15/16 am am am am %of Total %m Vehicles %m Vehicles %m Vehicles %m Vehicles %m Service by Mode [1] Trips Trips Trips Total in Active Trips Total in Active Trips Total in Arrive Trips Total in Active Trips Total Trips Service Trips Service Trips Service Trips Service Trips Rail [2] M.1 2,700,117 19% 878,438 6% 888,844 6% 898,216 5% 1,048,003 6% 1,071,669 7% RCTC Commuter Ra ll- Riverside 1,101,646 215,864 208,230 175,032 160,388 157,748 RCTC Commuter Rail- Inland Empire Orange County 1,066,541 455,510 500,786 553,520 626,557 610,482 RCTC Commuter Ra ll-91 531,930 207,064 179,828 169,664 261,058 303,439 Public Bus, Fixed Route [3] 10,575,445 76% 13,115,046 86% 269 13,603,825 86% 380 14,102,821 86% 306 14,159,311 85% 305 13,460,620 85% RTA FR 5,718,234 6,555,135 94 6,861,830 191 7,155,365 124 7,203,364 122 7,081,410 SunUne FR 3,474,361 4,436,917 69 4,494,549 69 4,643,147 71 4,645,097 76 4,316,234 RTA Contract FR 916,366 1,635,377 80 1,713,555 90 1,744,652 79 1,753,518 78 1,534,671 Banning FR 183,265 127,499 5 138,503 5 146,981 5 135,244 7 127,524 Corona FR 146,983 153,783 4 163,054 4 169,745 6 168,303 6 152,728 Beaumont FR 89,962 164,390 9 190,589 13 198,499 13 204,112 11 202,826 Palo Verde Valley FR 46,274 41,945 8 41,745 8 44,432 8 49,673 5 45,227 Public Demand Response 548,845 4% 767,883 5% 206 795,503 5% 219 823,649 5% 188 840,811 5% 187 840,167 5% RTA DAR 199,322 372,322 125 384,442 106 398,636 98 406,000 102 413,968 Riverside Special Tra nsportation Services DAR 145,223 174,058 29 172,725 47 182,878 36 175,276 32 167,439 SunUne DAR 83,956 124,720 31 136,208 45 139,042 33 153,183 37 164,024 Corona DAR 58,892 61,285 12 65,635 12 68,852 12 66,015 9 63,162 Beaumont DAR 28,656 18,786 4 18,710 3 16,899 3 18,640 3 10,910 RTA Taxi 18,536 7,648 - 8,539 - 8,271 - 11,963 - 10,594 Banning DAR 9,463 9,064 5 9,244 6 9,071 6 9,734 4 10,070 Specialized Transportation/ 61,859 0.4% 494,516 3% 45 559,104 4% 54 577,736 4% 50 543,296 3% 46 416,338 3% Universal Call Program [4] Fixed Route: RTA Extended Services - 101,038 108,180 68,726 50,851 - 27,033 RTA Commuter Link - 58,466 64,171 62,542 73,635 - 0 SunUne Commuter Link 220 - - 12,868 14,528 13,952 - 6,437 SunU ne Une 95 North Shore - - - 26,603 15,605 - 36,295 Paratransit/ Community Shuttle Services: Boys & Girls Club of Southwest County - 57,044 13 49,135 1 41,676 14 38,767 13 40,663 Care -A -Van/ HOPE Bus 9,295 20,115 10 25,060 1 29,845 13 22,394 9 22,203 Care Connexxus 13,755 15,829 4 17,597 16,333 5 17,296 - 18,273 City of Norco -Senior Shuttle 2,606 1,130 1 2,066 1,956 1 2,189 1 2,984 CVAG Roy's Desert Resource Center - 38,945 2 46,561 45,272 2 17,288 - - ForestFolk,lnc. 4,842 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 1 2,270 Friends of Moreno Valley Senior Center Inc., 4,842 5,364 1 4,941 3,002 1 4,574 1 4,313 Inland AIDS Project 1,974 2,377 2 2,354 2,342 1,723 - 2,046 Operation Safehouse - 524 1 309 624 1 765 1 1,406 Riverside County Regional Medical Center RCRMC - 10,071 10 9,208 1 5,835 10 7,640 17 7,629 County of Riverside Department of Mental Health - - - 1,408 United Stales Veterans Initiative - - - - 5,217 3 2,333 3 3,774 Wildomar Senior Community - 440 1 446 - - - - - - Mileage Reimbursement (one-way trips supported): Crt.App'td Spec.Advocates-CASA/Voice for Children - 9,380 6,696 5,702 - n/e - VoicesforChildren - 0 0 0 - n/a 3,222 TRIP -Partnership to Preserve Independent Living (West County) 24,393 82,383 83,831 87,850 89,828 n/a 59,302 TRIP - Partnership to Preserve Independent Living (East County) 19,779 n/a Bus Passes/Taxi Vouchers/ Vanpool Trips: I Community Connect/ TAP Bus Pass Trips - 65,263 62,742 65,212 71,230 n/a 74,818 RCTC Commuter benefits/ Coachella Van Pool Trips - 19,037 17,700 18,740 - n/a - RTA-Travel Training 5,026 39,334 65,354 81,031 n/e 94,213 RTA-Dial A Ride Plus 0 n/a 1,558 SunU ne Taxi Voucher Program - 2,084 5,905 10,377 12,416 n/a 6,491 Mobility Management and Travel Training Projects: 4 Care Connexxus- Driver Sensitivity Training - n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Community Connect/ 211 - n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Blindness Support -Travel Training - Oa n/a n/a n/a n/a RTA Travel Training - n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a ALL TRIPS: Including Rail, Public Transit, Measure A IARC and New Freedom 13,886,266 100% 15,255,883 t00% sio 15,847,276 100% 653 16,402,422 100% 544 16,591,421 100% 538 15,788,794 10o% TOTAL POPULATION 2,005,477 2,217,778 2,227,577 2,255,059 2,279,967 2,308,441 Trips per Capita for 2006 Total Population (5) 6.9 Trips per Capita for 2012 Total Population 161 6.9 Trips per Capita for 2013 Total Population p) 7.1 Trips per Capita for 2014 Total Population [8] 7.2 Trips per Capita for 2015 Total Population [91 7.3 Trips per Capita for 2016 Total Population 110] 6.8 Notes: [1] Public transit operator ridership data extracted from TransTrack'Table 2 - SRTP Service Summary' on April 4, 2017. Vehicle d to reported directly from operators on April 6, 2017. [2] FY13-14 Annualized from average weekday daily boardings at Riverside County stations: Riverside, 91 and Inland Empire -Orange County Lines. FY14-15 and FY 15-16 Annualized from average weekday AND average weekend daily boardings from SCRRA reported monthly ridership at Riverside County stations. There is no weekend service on the Riverside line. [3]Public bus, fixed route trips for RTA and SunUne do not include Spe al ized Transportation funded fixed route trips: RTA Extended, Commuterlink and RTA Travel Training, SunLine CommuterLink and Line 95,and Community Connect TAP/RTA. [4] Specialized Transportation ridership and vehicle data reported directly by specialized transportation operators. RTA and SunUne included in public bus [3] [5] through [9] RCTC Fiscal Year Mid -Year Revenue Projections - Department of Finance January 1st: Demographic Research Unit county population AMMA PAGE 124 225 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Appendix C — Bus Stop Location Counts by Operators Supporting Table 4 (Transfer Locations) RTA Routes and Connections/ Transfer Locations As at Jan 2017 INTRA SYSTEM INTRA-COUNTY I REGIONAL ROUTES/ 1 3 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 29 30 31 32 33 40 41 42 49 50 51 52 54 55 61 74 79 202 204 206 208 210 212 216 9 �'d �d tf'� � ,aaa' ``of ♦ ti' �„�' a+v a60� ti ��p D� > a's'^` ,�`' DPP PP Pay t� ,p°' Aac�p AAM1 �'�p AA a AA m AA`` a.�A CND J�& �o , v5Q ,. '' Spv°• 217 J�x <9 <9 <9 ¢'^ • W o to 0 0 0 oA ? zg a R' A o� of ¢� 1 1 3 4 4 4 5 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 58 3 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 10 8 1 1 1 1 4 10 3 3 3 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 r 34 11 1 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 r 13 12 4 3 4 3 6 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 r 36 13 4 3 4 3 5 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 o. 40 14 4 4 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 r 41 15 5 3 6 5 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 45 16 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 1 1 18 18 3 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 15 19 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 25 20 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 r 19 21 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 r 16 22 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 r 33 23 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 1 1 o 15 24 2� 2 2 3 1 t 10 26 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 r 15 27 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 32 29 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 20 30 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 r 30 31 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 r 27 32 1 2 3 2 3 1 2 2 r 16 33 3 2 3 1 3 2 1 1 r 16 40 1 1 1 1 1 5 41 1 3 2 1 1 1 o 9 42 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 r 10 49 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 50 1 1 1 1 4 51 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 16 52 2 2 1 2 3 2 1 r 13 54 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 r 22 55 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 r 14. 61 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 r 16 74 1 1 3 2 2 3 3 1 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 r 32 79 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 r 27 202 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 r 14 204 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 r 28 206 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 14 208 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 3 1 1 2 r 48 210 3 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 3 1 1 1 6 1 2 r 43 212 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 42 216 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 33 217 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 26 OCTA 794 1 1 1 3 48 4 4 33 12 35 38 36 39 17 14 23 18 14 31 15 10 31 18 9 24 16 16 5 9 10 16 4 15 14 15 30 27 7 22 11 41 32 37 25 22 0 1 6 6 2 0 30 8 1 12 8 10 2 2 1 16 3 2 1 1 2 1 962 TOTALS BY TYPE OF CONNECTION Intra System 847 In ra-County 15 Region I Rail 51 Regional Bus 49 NOTE: Some routes connect only in one direction, do not necessarily make a meaningful connection on the route's reverse dirction. AM MA PAGE I25 226 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 SunLine Routes and Connections/ Transfer Locations as of January 2017 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION INTRA-SYSTEM INTRA-COUNTY REGIONAL RAIL/INTER-CIT Routes 14 15 20 24 30 32 53 54 70 80 81 90 91 95 111 220 14 15 20 24 30 32 53 54 70 80 81 90 91 95 111 220 c` a�,t�e�e i 444 P o ar 1 1 1 2 1 1 r 7 1 1 ► 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ► 4 2 1 2 2 ► 7 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 ► 9 1 1 2 1 1 ► 6 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 14 1 1 1 ► 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 ► 9 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 ► 10 1 1 1 2 1 1 ► 7 1 1 1 2 1 1 ► 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 ► 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 ► 7 ► 2 ► 3 ► 7 ► 9 ► 5 ► 14 ► 2 ► 9 ► 9 ► 7 ► 7 ► 6 ► 17 ► 5 1 1 8 2 126 TOTALS BY TYPE OF CONNECTION Intra-System 104 Inter -Co. 6 Regional 11 121 * Effective date: September 10, 2012 ** Effective date: September 2, 2013 *** Effective date: January 6, 2014 **** Effective date: January 3, 2016 Sun Line's Route #220 to the Metrol i nk station at downtown Riverside supports out -of -county connections to San Bernardino, Los Angeles and San Diego Counties through the host of transfer options afforded at each of these stops. AM MA PAGE I26 227 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Pass Transit Routes and Connections/ Transfer Locations INTRA-SYSTEM INTRA-COUNTY REGIONAL BUS REGIONL RAIL Route #s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 �o t a� 2, �PO J�+C‘ a` \�4' �¢toa Q• a a �o�� ado �� �` •.ova `'ac a`0Jsf \cat 00,".' , \c�j . y ti �Pti .Soh Pt`� PPS yc� Q-e4' ��c� F o°a e ° tea\ y \C a\ C. C. C. is Q� C�� P '2, N'S QP r �QP 120 •,So �.-P .R-> c., ' () O� O� O� O� 4\ e J� .soN. \S¢ Qd`' ,),a\ , 1 1 1 2 54 9 9 8 8 4 4 3 1 2 1 ► 103 3 8 9 11 9 9 2 2 1 1 1 ► 53 4 8 9 11 8 8 1 1 1 1 1 ► 49 5 2 1 ► 3 6 2 1 ► 3 7 0 4 2 1 0 0 4 0 ► 11 9 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 ► 10 120 1 3 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 ► 26 ► 72 ► 26 ► 25 ► 23 ► 27 ► 27 ► 9 ► 12 ► 6 1 9 8 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 0 259 TOTALS BY TYPE OF CONNECTION Intra-System Bus 227 Intra-County Bus 18 Regional Bus 10 Regional Rail/ Intercity Bus 4 259 Corona Cruiser Routes and Connections/ Transfer Locations INTRA-SYSTEM INTRA-COUNTY REGIONAL RAIL/ INTERCITY BUS Routes Red e �d` SiQ ���?�` e,.t� ,so' eJr° Blue 5 p� C�� Red 9 23 3 35 Blue 9 29 5 43 TOTALS BY TYPE OF CONNECTION Intra-System 18 Intra-County 52 Regional 8 p 70 AmmA PAGE 127 228 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 PVVTA Routes and Connections/ Transfer Locations INTRA-SYSTEM INTRA-COUNTY REGIONAL RAIL Routes 1 2 3 4 '(\ o' �P ����� e,k* •S� eJro 5 Q� P� 1 3 1 2 1 7 2 3 1 2 6 3 1 1 1 3 4 2 2 1 5 5 0 TOTALS 6 6 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 21 Note: Route 5 is a weekend route and is the only route in operation. No other routes are available to transfer to. Quartzsite Transit Services in Arizona connects paratransit services into Blythe/PVVTA Monday -Friday. AM M�A OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PAGE I28 229 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2015/2016 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Appendix D — Public Transit Fleet Size Over Four Fiscal Years Public Transit Vehicles FY FY FY FY %Change from Prior 2012/2013 Di 2013/2014 [1] 2014/2015 [2] 2015/2016 Year 4-Year History Transit Vehicles only (fixed -route and demand response, excluding taxis) RTA, City of Riverside, Corona, Banning, Beaumont, SunLine, Palo Verde Valley Western Riverside County 339 372 382 374 -2% Fixed Route Demand Response 198 141 217 155 227 155 224 150 Coachella Valley 100 104 104 113 9% Fixed Route Demand Response 69 31 69 35 71 33 76 37 Palo Verde Valley 8 8 8 8 0% Fixed Route 8 8 8 5 Countywide Totals 447 484 494 495 0% [1] Revised reporting from prior year reports; excludes support vehicles. [2] Excludes support vehicles and includes vehicles active as of June 30, 2016 Source: Vehicle information directly reported by operators April 6, 2017. AM•M�A PAGE 129 230 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Riverside County Public Transportation Annual Countywide Performance Report Fiscal Year 2015/16 Commission Presentation July 12, 2017 _,"' History and Purposes RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION • Fourth Edition of the Annual Report — Data: Audit Period FY 2015/16 • Purposes: — Comply with Transportation Development Act law — Outcome based performance methodology — Countywide view of transit performance, all modes — Snapshot in time, a group of benchmark measures RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION • Period of declining ridership, following long period of growth • Funding is flat or close to it — Local Transportation Fund — State Transit Assistance — Measure A Measures RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1. Farebox— Regulatorycompliance 2. Utilization — Trips per capita 3. Coverage — Percent of population within % mile of fixed -route 4. Connectivity —Number of available connection locations 5. Resources — Funding, vehicles, and vehicle revenue miles Measurement: Farebox RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1. Farebox — Regulatory Compliance Farebox Recovery Ratio 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% Banning Beaumont Corona PVVTA City of Riverside Riverside Transit Agency ■ 2013 ■ 2014 ■ 2015 2016 Minimum Farebox Recovery SunLine J Y- =14151k Measurement: Trips per Capita ROTC RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2. Utilization — Trips per Capita 18,000,000 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 13,886,266 FY 05/06 15,847,276 15,255,883 16,402,422 17,778 2,227,57 FY 11/12 16,591,421 3 15,788,794 6.8 10.0 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 2,255,059 2,279,967 2,308,441 5.5 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 fY 15/16 =Passenger Trips =Population —Trips Per Capita 5.0 Trips Per Capita 6 wvz - - - 101� �.E L DEL Him Measurement: erage ROTC RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 3. Coverage - Percent of Population Within % Mile of Fixed -Route Coverage FY 2015-16 RTA Population 1,747,410 3/4 Mile Coverage Population 1,307,429 Coverage % 75% Corona 170,964 125,617 73% Pass Transit 84,113 77,201 92% SunLine 422,874 348,151 82% PVVTA 16,376 14,819 90% Total 2,441,737 1,873,217 77% The Americans with Disabilities Act requires transit agencies to provide paratransit service within % of a mile of fixed -route bus route or rail station wvz - - - L 11,1 Him ,__ Measurement: onnectivity ROTC RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 4. Connectivity - Number of Available Connection Locations Riverside County Public Transportation FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 Bus Stop Transfer Connections Intra-System Intra-County Bus, Within County Regional Bus Transit Between Counties Regional Rail and National Inter -City Bus 1,315 88°% 3% 6% 3% 1,255 85% 5% 6% 3% 1,447 82% 8% 5% 5% Chng from FY 14/15 1,441 84% 6% 4% 5% 0% Measurement: urces ROTC RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 5. Resources - Funding, Vehicles, and Vehicle Revenue Miles Riverside Coun y Public Transportation FY 2012/13 FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 Transportation Resources State and Local Operating Funds Public Transit Vehicles (Fixed Route and Paratransit) Vehicle Revenue Miles (Fixed Route and Paratransit) Square Miles of Transit Service Area Vehicles Per Square Mile Vehicle Revenue Miles Per Square Mile $53,903,436 447 16,132,145 4,887 0.09 3,301 $61,835,874 484 16,856,113 4,499 0.11 3,747 $69,988,653 494 17,830,287 4,499 0.11 3,963 FY 2015/16 %Chngfrom FY 14/15 $72,640,997 495 19,086,249 4,499 0.11 4,242 3.8 0.2 7.0% no change 0.2 7.0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION • Spring - Commences when audited performance numbers are available • May -Presented to the Citizens Advisory Committee • June - Presented to Budget and Implementation Committee • July -Presented to the Commission Questions? RIVERSIDE COUNTY RANSPORTATION COMMISSION Thank You Robert Yates Multimodal Services Director n. 0 ....... .. i�et,4 the. h".1 11on PM- eet taa-r added the lour v stzti s I I ceat�y approv, ed P1 la3)s tO c an =11 eth. c 2".5 P er C e n t di se- ,*Tnit at those stations for an,o,,Ither st,'i raonens I 3taud i- ford sajkd� 'OuNser tnt to see that. tr ai -n Hder.hi 'Longi-teram: fnvestmentt T11; P, -*nl.ew sta,tiovl-ls feed inito 1tVfet.-1011`D­k "S"., 91 LAW th.,it runs- to Los Ai.-i le; 'a !A+X tZkV10 n ifter stVs rton an Nb+r-%�alk-- The new cxten- vf tbe K/Perris Is veVel fli+1 r iW m t. t In e ru U te a ed 22 8 r I R iders, a day tar sh. _v+, of th , 4,000 fides s a. dtnqv that tran!�ipor- tatlion planncrs mv+lsioned f ,* 'r the smite 11ne thatt ex - in t"encs thro, Imh Los Anx+eflles- M.etrol nk spokgsrnan scot t Johnson said its ex- tensive Inarketin-g paign included billboards. r441'0. ads and direct mail h --s the routelau-ne' ed. ,JW ore people le of the T.-ftris Valley H it rids er- Is h �� r nrs behave steadily v�;,, nu .xX .rftn, he said,, est a lon g-term iny that may tot see the ..i nunibers of riders to,* J, inson ol said. "'We cer .TWY anticipate the rider- shifi inuing to clirrib as i" yeaxs progress,, 1­e. called the line a+ crit- :1=1X piece of the region's -t OX portation network as "t. bmters seek Iterna- 1V1+ + e to dri i n++++g th 91 or Q15 Is'reeways, Rider surveys Show t-hat++ many who try the route return, Johnso'n said. "Onee.peo. ple++try: a train or tr publictr sit thefte y .very"of­ fti-st getting times its J ,++ over that, initial hurdle."' rolink now- offers 12 met Arips weekday trips daily but noregular weekend ser- t + VIC e 'h rl on t Per is. line. One challenge, Stand* + for slaid:,,, is. tl..ie fact that adding more train service, C mmuters wa board the Perris Wle Line Metr.otjn*. co al:n at: th P r to -k e e ris-South Station In November, Ridership has Increased after a slow start. Id likelly ldrzaw xd� Wou. more ri e, More trains sev n I : Ann. 01,son former -chair MORE R IDERS ens, but witbout�sztfrongridr_ ershl_ -h'i.) Wsha,rd10 *ncre-a-se S n a Jacinto C'V� m­anAndre Koty�u W iai-r foulldation and. p Its - rL ent of X id MRO Engineering Metrolink's 24-mile Perris Valley Line between Riverside and er svice man. ofhe Metka tbordin Same ernnsaidthe Per- to south Perris opened in June 2016 to low ridersh ip, A i71 Comparison of its first two full months and the two most In. the Ion, g term,, the. and a R-i'verside County ris V410project stood •-out 4­ recent months shows that is changing, agency hopes, to boost ser- Transportation Commis- for its. size and potential to Vice -to conim, tets v�ho U si ion member,, said contin- ease cornmute'rs* oi- Lives. work1n Riverside and other ued building of ho-nies in %, son, who chaired the kidg- J Perrts-south Station Inland job centers, he said. For now, numbers show the region and a coming increase gas tax' could draw ing panel for the award said it *s rare to see 24 new uly 2 01 (5, . MM111 1072 that Los Angeles Union more trans, iders, miles of transit in any com- AUg, 2016 1,254 'Station is the most po pular -that growth that jnunit)� OUT April 2017 11111"I'Mis"..'" SO& destination 1br Perris. VAIley 'ky:Xorw pushes Sou errn,:Callfor�-. It Was a. very large,, sng- Ma "'1017 y riders, followed alk b it nue nia. is going *. oto ''i ant proi nift-1. I off *ect to �ul and develop afi.. d, of cours.e., the an d Pull. of N V she, said.. Peftls-Downtown stastatorFullerton. As part. heftr Perms'Vhnhwhowvnaieksobui es setld 6 n.a JWY201. reach. local commuters, we're ahead of that curve to ridership on the Perris Val- Aug. 20716:. 9 87 the commisswn partnered itht reduce traffic andp011ut.' 1� line, the transporta- April 9.017 ide wi -.he Riversi Transit and move people to jobs, ed tion commission is lookiing . .. .. . .. Agency on a1ree shutUe ser- ucation and even. entertaiin>- aheamid to more C. xpansion.. 43Y 2017 Ex 411". all,: x I Emu 1599 vice at the downtowm River- ment." he said. The agency's long-term. M0fw8V&11ey/MaMhFi414Stab4j1 side station that takes pa- Kotyu.k said he's proud tra*nsit stu'4y should be July 2016 1,177 trons to their Jobs., ta n that, the Callforni - Tra. S_ comolete. early next year, The shuttle. sery W*e didn't portation Foundation in Standitfo , - a-id, d r... s Aug, 2016 get many hiders 'when lit May —named the Perris Val-, .., Thestudywil I k. at; the I oo Ap 1.970 �rll 2017 started in October but has ley line its transit project of possIMMiy of continu ng the May 2017 Oi, G I&M 2 3 2 5 een Ini roveni . also s ent .16. 20 4 Metrolunk line from Perrits Rivetside-flunter Fork, station inthen.then. Fro'w,Novem- The Sac rarnento-based to San ..--Jacinto and Hemet ber 2016 to February 2017,, group, which offers schol. Plans also being stud - are July 2,016 452 it averaged. 1r, boardings arships to students seekin 9 le i d to extend an Anitrak Aug., 1 2016 526L a raouth, but,.ftom March careers in the transpqrtao, line from LosAngeles that A J1 2017 2,201 pr' to May, it has averaged In 26.6 a onth, said Bradley is m, tion -field ade up of dustry of ficlials. It recog- in naw nds at Palm Spr' gs further cast into Ind io so it W6aver, a spokesman for nizes. projects frorn across. could serve the Coachella ths e buservice. the state eakh yeat AN ".>�.. ,v . .,i>�`:. �... ..... .... .r..... .. :� .,,c. r,..a...:....:r Y.. -.. r. �.X n.�f. ... ....... ... f .v: ...a•.:.. :3:•5.-::.: ?`:n}. ,- ---- r ..R : r ....:{t.:.............. .......................K. ....... .. .: %::;.n•.{t•.v:::..v ..t. ,.,a• <:... .�.. a� -`'---- r.:r � : r F . 1. .. ._..._ .... .. .. ...... ............ .:.... -. >}•::;F:;, �. �� �,rl :$.{ •. :: 4.- ..Y.: •:.F:.?Yn'Fr:: 'J::•X:.i• •::R/,•f ..Y•,'>Z' lfiJ .r . .. k .. u r..... F.. F.. r � � .. ..... ..ryi.... h. •4.. ... .. 3 ':. vie$' x. }:}:\:k^':: :�•:;i r. Z .. .. ... .. .......... ......... .... n'a. ..... ., � .a ... h. X...... .. `ir. R . .. ?`t•. {}, i.4 .�. , F... %i:{•. .. :h:. r..Ji':.r -� : r.{' :-? ..`-� r ..,C,i: ' . }. , ..,:. .:_.......�.. x.r.... ,.. , . r. . v .. ...._.... .k....:. .r .... .:�,. .�.... rr . ..t .%4 }. .;,J. t}�i: r$• . .. .......................... .. 7.. .� .. Ste.$ . . .. ...r. r: .....Q.. .... ... . :.� ., ., .. . . . r.. .... .. ...... :..:: i.-:fry?}•r. .; Fi \ aP ..{;:"'' ............................ ,.,, a..... - -- fr...YF .. ... : .. .. .`f..i ..... .. i a .i . r.r?.s?: ...:..�-.......-. ...tea. .rr. J R{. .r n : :}k,.. :. a.:::. �3. .�.: '� .z.,} w•`r::°. :'•J�:}r• .. .. .. ... ..,.•........... r. .. . . .. �.� .. . .yxiy.�. .. .. 5J .. ........ .. .•Y. :Fir .... ::.:::::..- x::::.:::. r :F.v: � �... ........ .. r.... ... n................. en..i. . v r ... ..{ .... n ..... ...,... .. r;/ .. .... .: :f. }- � .4. r�. i}F.. . Syr, .r. ........ .....v::: - '• :.. -.. .. :•5.... :. .v.a ..a. .r..v... .. v. :. .:.x •. .:.. '. ,:: n• : f .r. : :. .v 4?y ...... a ... ..ava... . '. r`�`�,�x �. r .. .. ...... r .. .. . -... ... v: •::..:•: • r.%::: .3$:rf'$•: ..... ........ ..... .... , ....,,.. n. v r .. .. 'k�9 .. h. ...:rx.. ..r F }r. ::S: Yti + :.4::t•?•ra:...,. .� pp {..ar3 ..: ...- .. ....,... ..:....... ... rc.3. , ..{.. '. .. a ..a Y .. . . .. .. r}R: .. ...n'... ..R... h,Y.[: �::i.v. r... �':%:fi:.K . .. .h.�v.h... .. ..... ...... r3Lt. .. r $� r. a: : .. t n Xk.. .. .. ... n. .. ..:.•�. :-:-Y.-$:n}:� r`.4F a. ... x }}}},, ..:va... ,. r X .'Y'... ':'J.. .. .v.. /'�: : ra. ..r .... .;•••,:: t: {::. .�'.}i..Fr ,' .,t' - hx i r. a ..A a. � .nt�... -:?'.r��`.. i•; ..fY r •::h v:' . ........:.. ......... .......... -r. .r>'` , r ..'lc?a .. ... .. .. nw:::. ..... .. ..w. .. $c:..... ..rr ..... ,..•: i..r ..w"ffF 4.rr ........... ........., ......... r.A.n \r �'.. fi ..$y- ..:u. r.�ay. :.,: ^ ,. ,A�v�..�F.F ,.:.{{..i n...... � ...!Cta.n... t.. • .. f.. �•r.4.,... '.i. :.R ..{{++,I✓'y ;,rR "SY 5�' t,Y,-> •rS �p��yk�V F ✓..4.9� r '-:• �X" ig�r• , . ,/f Fr ;ry. JR ,. "'e>�a$A� `v7�x$:8:�t . : � a� 'i i 'a��e:.��+ l ,%>@rb. s. a,:'..a. wr p. � <7 iG afh.,��e ��J /: �:2''<':�� ��T� t�� .<• �. P�Y r S£ .fd4`�eak' 4.ry sr»{i y,i °•3:9aiZ?' 'S'oy »' € F ...«. k .,.F. v,.: i/'a'r t..:E•�A> S. f. �.3...c 5w. .d;.. p... iw. 4' Yc:��3�.e, �;.:o. •,.a .a a:.�.,. •. .., L.KY' , �.h. .•$$�v, 6Q :M.;. .� �. 'a .Y'3.Q' K k �•;L...,.. , �3�+°°•��'. .s:•s.a:. -;a �ro.%@�a rani } ¢ar rA+day �p Donn Milan. Ol" va a��..a3 }. �Y `�i.L": is�. y.w"e.;'.Y.s '}#.�.{•. �''�.�. ��:, . } '• '• +'�,• ••. ::�.,�A. g.'. � ..y�. : e.�3 . � �a b s t'eD-aoZ• iE..ts.y�i�F .�.:. �. �.Y.�ke+Y�` LBO �. �!.>dav�,u�f : fi8 ..$. �- �3Ac� �:.t.,w ° y..y...�., � ,, > a., :.tip 4. .' t ✓ �..� '„��}e.< :f ss ,3� . .-:. �ss2w•. 2.a,:.0 .::: ... ...,.: .. .,,.:.,:.,,... r.:. :: ::::. .... ...J�..SCU+%G..ln,r:. ......... ....... .. ..,..... .... .... .... r:e �.