Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout06 June 13, 2018 CommissionCOMM-COMM-00081 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 'METING AGENDA TIIVE/DATE: 9:30 a.m / 1Nednesday, June 13, 2018 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside CO'NISSIONERS Chair — Dana Reed Vice Chair —Chuck Washington Second Vice Chair — Ben J. Benoit Kevin Jeffries, County of Riverside, District 1 John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside, District 2 Chuck Washington, County of Riverside, District 3 V. Manuel Perez, County of Riverside, District 4 Marion Ashley, County of Riverside, District 5 Deborah Franklin / Art WbIch, City of Banning Lloyd White / Nancy Carroll, City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck / Tim Wade, City of Blythe Jim Hyatt / Linda Molina, City of Calimesa Randall Bonner / Vicki Warren, City of Canyon Lake Greg Pettis / Shelley Kaplan, City of Cathedral City Steven Hemandez / To Be Appointed, City of Coachella Karen Spiegel / Randy Fox, City of Corona Scott Mates / Russell Betts, City of Desert Hot Springs Adam Rush /Clint Lorimore, City of Eastvale Linda Krupa / Russ Brown, City of Hemet Dana Reed / To Be Appointed, City of Indian Wells Michael Wilson / Glenn IVfller, City of Indio Brian Berkson / Veme Lauritzen, City of Jurupa Valley Kathleen Fitzpatrick / Robert Radi, City of La Quinta Bob Magee / Natasha Johnson, City of Lake Elsinore To Be Appointed / John Denver, City of Menifee Victoria Baca / Ulises Cabrera, City of Moreno Valley Rick Gibbs / Jonathan Ingram City of Murrieta Berwin Hanna / Ted Hoffman, City of Norco Jan Hamik / Kathleen Kelly, City of Palm Desert Lisa Middleton / Jon R Roberts, City of Palm Springs Michael M. Vargas / Rita Rogers, City of Perris Ted Weill / Charles Townsend, City of Rancho Mirage Rusty Bailey / Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside Andrew Kotyuk / Scott IVfller, City of San Jacinto Michael S. Naggar / Matt Rahn, City of Temecula Ben J. Benoit / Timothy Walker, City of Wfldomar John Bulinski, Governor's Appointee Caltrans District 8 Comments are welcomed by the Cormission. If you wish to provide comments to the Conrrission, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the perk of the Board. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Riverside County Transportation Commission Lisa Mobley, Clerk of the Board June 6, 2018 G.C. 84308 Compliance — Potential Conflict of Interest California Government Code 84308 states a Commissioner may not participate in any discussion or action concerning a contract or amendment if a campaign contribution of more than $250 is received in the past 12 months or 3 months following the conclusion from a bidder or bidder's agent. The Commission's procurement division asks potential vendors to disclose any contributions made to the campaigns of any Commissioner as part of their submitted bid packets. As an additional precaution, those entities are included below in an effort to give Commissioners opportunity to review their campaign statements for potential conflicts. Please note the entities listed in this memo are not encompassing of all potential conflicts and are in addition to any personal conflicts of interest such as those disclosed on Statement of Economic Interests — Form 700 or prohibited by Government Code Section 1090. Please contact me should you have any questions. Agenda Item No. 8E — Recurring Contracts for Fiscal Year 2018/19 Consultant(s): AMMA Transit Planning Heather Menninger, Principal 393 Two Trees Road Riverside, CA 92507 Best Best and Krieger, LLP Steven DeBaun, Partner 3390 University Avenue, 5t" Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Becthel Infrastructure Corp. George Nomura, Project Manager 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 BLX Group LLC Robin L. Schlingen, Managing Director 1910 S. Stupley Drive, Suite 115 Mesa, AZ 85204 Epic Land Solutions, Inc. Holly Rockwell, President 3850 Vine Street, Suite 200 Riverside, CA 92507 Exigent Systems, Inc. Dustin E. Hoffman, President 1020 Nevada Street, Suite 201 Redlands, CA 92374 Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Daniel L. Wiles, Principal 19900 MacArthur Boulevard Suite 1100 Irvine, CA 92612 Mathis Group Dr. Bill Mathis, Owner 11660 Church Street, Suite 714 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RCTC Potential Conflicts of Interest June 6, 2018 Page 2 MuniServices, LLC Stantec Doug Jensen, Senior Vice President Sheldon Mar, Senior Associate 7625 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 108 475 5th Avenue, 12th Floor Fresno, CA 93711 New York, NY 10017 Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP Victor Hsu, Partner 555 South Flower Street, 41sY Flr. Los Angeles, CA 90071 Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Devin Brennan, Partner 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Case Systems, Inc. Chrisann Lawson, Vice President 5 Goddard Irvine, CA 92618 TSC2 Group Tom R. Skancke, CEO 2620 Regatta Drive, # 102 Las Vegas, NV 89128 U.S. Bank National Association Ashraf Almurdaah, Vice President 633 W. 5th Street, 24th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 UCR Forecast LLC Sherif Hanna, Deputy Director 5777 W. Century Blvd., Suite 895 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Agenda Item No. 8J — Change Order to Amend the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project Design -Build Contract with Skanska-Ames, a Joint Venture, for the Interstate 15/State Route 91 Express Lanes Connector Project Consultant(s): Skanska-Ames Joint Venture Brandon Liesemeyer, Project Manager 1801 California Avenue Corona, CA 92881 Agenda Item No. 80 — Amendment to Agreement for Routine and On -Call Railroad Right of Way Property Maintenance Services Consultants(s): Joshua Grading &Excavating, Inc. Thomas R. Craft, Owner P.O. Box 292329 Phelan, CA 92329 Agenda Item No. 8T — Amendments to Freeway Service Patrol Agreements Consultant(s): Pepe's Towing Manny Acosta, Manager 1303 E. Victoria Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92408 RCTC Potential Conflicts of Interest June 6, 2018 Page 3 Agenda Item No. 8U — Amendment to TransTrack Systems, Inc. Agreement Consultant(s): TransTrack Systems Inc. David Jackson, General Manager 5265 Rockwell Drive NE Cedar Rapids, IA 52402 Agenda Item 8W — Agreement for Closed Circuit Television System Maintenance/Repair and Installation Services Consultant(s): American System Integrators Oliver Noval, President 8 Whatney, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92618 Agenda Item No. 13A — Closed Session — Conference with Real Property negotiator(s) Item APN(s) Buyers 1 342-150-028 Jamie and Gloria Sandoval 2 233-150-028 Thrifty Oil Company Tara Bve rl From: Tara Byerly Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2018 4:12 PM To: Tara Byerly Cc: Lisa Mobley; STAN DI FO; Anne Mayer Subject: RCTC: June Commission Agenda - 06.13.2018 Good afternoon Commissioners, The June Agenda for the Commission meeting scheduled for Wednesday, June 13, 2018 @ 9:30 a.m. is available. Please copy the link: http://www.rctc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/O6/june-commission-agenda-June-13-2018.original.pdf Conflict of Interest Memo.d... Conflict of Interest Form.pdf Also, attached for your review and information is the conflict of interest memo and form. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Respectfully, Tara Byerly Deputy Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 951.787.7141 W ( 951.787.7906 F 4080 Lemon St. 3rd FI. ( P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502 rctc.org f in t 1 Tara Bve rl From: Tara Byerly Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2018 4:14 PM To: Tara Byerly Cc: Lisa Mobley Subject: RCTC: June Commission Agenda - 06.13.2018 Good afternoon Commission Alternates, The June Agenda for the Commission meeting scheduled for Wednesday, June 13, 2018 @ 9:30 a.m. is available. Please copy the link: http://www.rctc.orawp-content/uploads/2018/06/june-commission-agenda-June-13-2018.original.pdf Respectfully, Tara Byerly Deputy Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 951.787.7141 W ( 951.787.7906 F 4080 Lemon St. 3rd FI. ( P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502 rctc.org f tor in i RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONER SIGN -IN SHEET JUNE 13, 2018 NAME AGENCY EMAIL ADDRESS Dibbl_, 64171-1i4l,(X_, JzJf1v1✓I0C>7 .LGrTYb uit-rL '-'P:›¢;i-ouoAi"Y e- 7/,; 1- L. 1 ' t/ :/,7 0 ,-e--------- E;(_,,f124 .. *_-__,.1. ttl. _ ( � n � Vl l�Zvl a Fx<<)% An a�Et�o ild ei Ae A ur- , p,) 1.," lid_ ijo A co IN, OA -ger ,S ,_ o rc/l'ot ---.e ? i le y _a____419 �'w.,\ )4-"I ,01 C-4.--in4 er"-/4 ItAT--;K- IQ - AGic ' c___ , /.._,Z.,--; � /.�!-s �ce.e.se,-,,e_____�� t ,11 (zia. , ija,,,,,,,,,,,/ Pet-eZ g,4,4, P)..r../.- id Ak-4,r) .1 tot- , le'Q a_ ........Z7—rZ\A,tkL,J, n 1 'IN$ VA C--4t a. AiNL5 k .-bi.4\A- - tj , jj\V,tAki ()Je lir �ilvcl�l/C/X�5G�/n-rl. 7°41 /4?/ L.7'I� 3 / 7 1%-i % - 1(;,,/,-. /1-fr,4 9 r7' t/v42-- - ‘ , /0 0/)7 . , A by 4-11 N%---6(2e. /43' ,- / 1 V e-",' /5-7- MNRi0,4 Alfitalln ottve• pus7S-1. ) „,„4,547 ,--,, 6-1") .-bA___,L, , _t_.----. ic,t____=3 yiN,t___N-- _..c-ra_lt.3r., 6)-46-tl- `,-.-.F.01,..,4- 10- sP"-i)- -(_'oG , I �O C7'Y :7-1.4rK NI( `s�r {�LM �lc\ Seik-Vn 1Wilarl � Z Coca �1/8! RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ROLL CALL JUNE 13, 2018 Present Absent County of Riverside, District I O' O lb .5-;)" 42-alit') County of Riverside, District II EV CI \'S'itett'xi County of Riverside, District III EV CI County of Riverside, District IV Lv O County of Riverside, District V 03•' C:l City of Banning C:P O City of Beaumont Q' O City of Blythe CV O City of Calimesa re O City of Canyon Lake Clr CI City of Cathedral City TY O City of Coachella Cr O City of Corona rg O City of Desert Hot Springs d ci City of Eastvale EY O City of Hemet L73/ O City of Indian Wells CV O City oWN in cr City of lurupa Valley lam' 0 City of la Quinta (TY O City of Lake Elsinore 0/ CI City of Meni e a a City of Moreno Valley 61/ 0 City of Murrieta O CGS City of Norco Cg" O City of Palm Desert 124 CI City of Palm Springs CY O City of Perris CV City of Rancho Mirage CAr City of Riverside re City of San Jacinto Ey City of Temecula Cr City of Wildomar TY O Governor's Appointee, Caltrans District 8 M. CI a 0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION www.rctc.org AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:30 a.m. Wednesday, June 13, 2018 BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, CA In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting at the Commission office, 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor, Riverside, CA, and on the Commission's website, www.rctc.org. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Government Code Section 54954.2, and the Federal Transit Administration Title VI, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141 if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, including accessibility and translation services. Assistance is provided free of charge. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting time will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide assistance at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS — Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3) continuous minutes or less. The Commission may, either at the direction of the Chair or by majority vote of the Commission, waive this three -minute time limitation. Depending on the number of items on the Agenda and the number of speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion, reduce the time of each speaker to two (2) continuous minutes. In addition, the maximum time for public comment for any individual item or topic is thirty (30) minutes. Also, the Commission may terminate public comments if such comments become repetitious. Speakers may not yield their time to others without the consent of the Chair. Any written documents to be distributed or presented to the Commission shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. This policy applies to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items. Under the Brown Act, the Commission should not take action on or discuss matters raised during public comment portion of the agenda that are not listed on the agenda. Commission members may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — MAY 9, 2018 Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 13, 2018 Page 2 6. PUBLIC HEARING — PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 1 1) Receive input on the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2018/19; 2) Close the public hearing on the proposed budget for FY 2018/19; 3) Approve the salary schedule effective July 5, 2018, located in Appendix B of the proposed budget; 4) Authorize the expenditure of 91 Express Lanes toll revenues designated as surplus in accordance with the 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds Indenture to fund a $20 million Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) Loan Reserve; 5) Adopt Resolution No. 18-004 "Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of Riverside County Transportation Commission to Increase Employer Contribution Towards Monthly Health Premiums" to increase the health care premium contribution up to a maximum of $750 per month to each employee or non -vested retiree beginning September 1, 2018, as approved by the Executive Committee on April 11, 2018; and 6) Adopt the proposed Budget for FY 2018/19. 7. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS — The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR —All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 8A. APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 Page 7 Overview This item is for the Commission to adopt Resolution 18-009, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Establishing the Annual Appropriations Limit", for Fiscal Year 2018/19. 8B. QUARTERLY SALES TAX ANALYSIS Page 14 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the sales tax analysis for Quarter 4, 2017 (4Q 2017). Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 13, 2018 Page 3 8C. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Page 23 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2018. 8D. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Page 91 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2018. 8E. RECURRING CONTRACTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 101 1) Approve the recurring contracts in an amount not to exceed $17,988,167 for Fiscal Year 2018/19, $381,600 for FYs 2019/20 — 2020/21, and $91,600 for FYs 2021/22 — 2022/23; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. 8F. REVISIONS TO THE PROCUREMENT POLICY MANUAL Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page113 1) Approve the revised Riverside County Transportation Commission Procurement Policy Manual (PPM) for the procurement and contracting activities undertaken by the Commission, pursuant to legal counsel review as to conformance to state and federal law; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 18-008, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Regarding the Revised Procurement Policy Manual". Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 13, 2018 Page 4 8G. FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION PROPOSED TRIENNIAL OVERALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE GOAL FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2019- 2021 Page 184 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt 9 percent as the Commission's Federal Transit Administration (FTA) proposed triennial overall disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) race -neutral goal for Federal Fiscal Years 2019-21 for the period October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2021; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 18-007, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Adopting Its Triennial Overall Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Goal (49 CFR Part 26) as it Applies to Funding Received Directly from the Federal Transit Administration". 8H. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; and 2) Adopt the following bill positions: a) AB 1912 (Rodriguez) — Oppose. Page 202 81. AGREEMENT WITH THE SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY FOR THE RELOCATION OF A BRINE LINE FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Page 208 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 18-31-149-00 with the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) for the relocation of a brine line for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (91 Project) in the amount of $68,400, plus a contingency amount of $6,600, for a total amount not to exceed $75,000; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total amount not to exceed as required for the relocation. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 13, 2018 Page 5 8J. CHANGE ORDER TO AMEND THE INTERSTATE 15 EXPRESS LANES PROJECT DESIGN - BUILD CONTRACT WITH SKANSKA-AMES, A JOINT VENTURE, FOR THE INTERSTATE 15/STATE ROUTE 91 EXPRESS LANES CONNECTOR PROJECT Page 222 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Change Order No. 6 to Agreement No. 16-31-057-00 for the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project (1-15 ELP) with Skanska-Ames, a Joint Venture, (Skanska-Ames) to perform final engineering design work and limited construction within the limits of the 1-15 ELP to accommodate the Interstate 15/State Route 91 Express Lanes Connector Project (15/91 ELC) in the amount of $2,891,000, plus a contingency amount of $289,100, for a total amount not to exceed $3,180,100; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the change order amendment on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total amount not to exceed as required for the project. 8K. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 15/91 EXPRESS LANES CONNECTOR PROJECT DESIGN -BUILD PHASE Page 241 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 18-31-145-00 with California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for enhanced oversight and construction inspection services in support of the Interstate 15/State Route 91 Express Lanes Connector Project (15/91 ELC) in the amount of $7,870,485 plus a contingency amount of $787,015, for a total amount not to exceed $8,657,500; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total amount not to exceed as required for the project; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve future non -funding amendments to this agreement. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 13, 2018 Page 6 8L. 2018 STATE ROUTE 91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Page 293 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the 2018 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. 8M. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 18-010, "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AMENDING AND ADOPTING LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT" Page 334 Overview This item is for the Commission to adopt Resolution No. 18-010, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Amending and Adopting Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act." 8N. INTERSTATE 15 EXPRESS LANES PROJECT — RAILROAD AGREEMENTS Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 338 1) Approve Agreement No. 18-31-152-00 with Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) for a license agreement for the Interstate 15 Express Lanes project (Project) in the amount of $22,000, plus a contingency amount of $2,200, for a total amount not to exceed $24,200; 2) Approve Agreement No. 18-31-153-00 with BNSF Railway (BNSF) for a construction and maintenance (C&M) agreement, including property acquisition, for the Project in the amount of $2,846,854, plus a contingency amount of $238,486, for a total amount not to exceed $3,085,340; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required by the Project. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 13, 2018 Page 7 80. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ROUTINE AND ON -CALL RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY PROPERTY MAINTENANCE SERVICES Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 425 1) Approve Agreement No. 17-33-028-02, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 17-33-028-00, with Joshua Grading & Excavating, Inc. (Joshua Grading) to provide grading, upgrades, and repairs property maintenance services in the amount of $1 million for a total amount not to exceed $4 million; 2) Authorize the revised statement of work, updated maintenance and repair requirements, and provision for work on non -railroad property; 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 4) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute task orders awarded to the contractor under the terms of the agreement; and 5) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency work pursuant to the agreement terms up to the total amount. 8P. DONATION AGREEMENTS TO TRANSFER MITIGATION PROPERTY TO THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 445 1) Approve Donation Agreement No. 18-72-106-00 between the Commission and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) granting land acquired for mitigation purposes on the SR-79 Realignment project; and 2) Approve Donation Agreement No. 18-73-105-00 between the Commission and RCA granting land acquired for mitigation purposes on the Mid County Parkway (MCP) project. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 13, 2018 Page 8 8Q. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE CITY OF PERRIS TO GRANT EXCESS MID COUNTY PARKWAY RIGHT OF WAY TO THE CITY FOR USE IN CITY'S PLACENTIA AVENUE WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN INDIAN AVENUE AND PERRIS BOULEVARD Page 481 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. 18-66-083-00 between the Commission and the city of Perris (City) stipulating the grant of excess right of way to the City for use on the City's Placentia Avenue widening project between Indian Avenue and Perris Boulevard; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the MOU; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute future non -funding related amendments to the MOU; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute documents related to the grant of excess right of way parcels acquired for the Mid County Parkway (MCP) project to the City for use on the Placentia Avenue widening project, in accordance with the Commission's right of way policies and procedures. 8R. FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AGREEMENT FOR INLAND EMPIRE RIDESHARE AND 511 SERVICES Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 489 1) Approve Agreement No. 18-45-142-00 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) to reimburse the Commission in an amount not to exceed $1,550,000 for Fiscal Year 2018/19 commuter/employer rideshare and Inland Empire 511 (IE511) programs administered by the Commission, on behalf of both agencies, as part of an ongoing bi-county partnership; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 13, 2018 Page 9 8S. AGREEMENTS WITH THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT FOR VANPOOL AND FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL PROJECTS Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 511 1) Approve Agreement No. 18-41-154-00 with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) for $1.5 million to fund ongoing vanpool subsidies; 2) Approve Agreement No. 18-45-155-00 with the AQMD for $500,000 to fund incremental weekend Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) service; and 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. 8T. AMENDMENTS TO FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL AGREEMENTS Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 544 1) Approve Agreement No. 14-45-009-08, Amendment No. 6 to Agreement No. 14-45-009-00, with Steve's Towing (Steve's) to provide Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) services on Beat Nos. 1 and 2 and State Route 91 Extended Services on Beat Nos. 1 and 2 through September 3, 2018, for an additional amount of $214,000, and a total amount not to exceed $3,498,057; 2) Approve Agreement No. 16-45-082-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 16-45-082-00, with Pepe's Towing (Pepe's) to provide FSP services on Beat No. 4 for an additional amount of $253,000, and a total amount not to exceed $1, 051, 000; 3) Approve Agreement No. 16-45-044-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 16-45-044-00, with Pepe's to provide FSP services on Beat No. 8 for an additional amount of $247,000, and a total amount not to exceed $1,022,000; and 4) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 13, 2018 Page 10 8U. AMENDMENT TO TRANSTRACK SYSTEMS, INC. AGREEMENT Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 558 1) Approve Agreement No. 08-62-005-08, Amendment No. 8 to Agreement No. 08-62-005-00 with TransTrack Systems, Inc. (TransTrack) to provide vanpool program financial module and custom programming services for an additional amount of $54,700, for a total amount not to exceed $611,700; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. 8V. FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 MEASURE A COMMUTER ASSISTANCE BUSPOOL SUBSIDY FUNDING CONTINUATION REQUESTS Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 567 1) Set the monthly buspool subsidy at $2,350/month; 2) Authorize payment of the $2,350/month maximum subsidy per buspool for the period July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019, to the existing Riverside and Riverside II buspools; and 3) Require subsidy recipients to meet monthly buspool reporting requirements as supporting documentation to receive payments. 8W. AGREEMENT FOR CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION SYSTEM MAINTENANCE/REPAIR AND INSTALLATION SERVICES Overview This item is for the Commission to: Page 572 1) Award Agreement No. 18-24-089-00 to American System Integrators for closed circuit television (CCTV) system maintenance/repair and installation services for a three-year term, and two, two-year options to extend the agreement, in an amount of $1,399,060, plus a contingency amount of $69,953, for a total amount not to exceed $1,469,013; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required for these services. Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 13, 2018 Page 11 8X. FISCAL YEARS 2018/19 — 2020/21 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS Page 597 Overview This item is for the Commission to approve the Fiscal Years 2018/19 — 2020/21 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTPs) for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and Riverside; Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA); Riverside Transit Agency (RTA); SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine); and the Commission's Commuter Rail Program. 9. UPDATE ON THE REGIONAL TRUCK STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A REGIONAL LOGISTICS MITIGATION FEE Page 602 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive an update and presentation on the Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of a Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee. 10. 25TH ANNIVERSARY OF METROLINK SERVICE IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY Page 605 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file a report on the 25th Anniversary of Metrolink in Riverside County. 11. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 12. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Commission activities. 13. CLOSED SESSION 13A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director or Designee Property Owner(s): See below Item APN(s) Buyers 1 342-150-028 Jamie and Gloria Sandoval 2 233-150-028 Thrifty Oil Company Riverside County Transportation Commission Agenda June 13, 2018 Page 12 14. ADJOURNMENT The next meeting of the Commission is scheduled to be held on Wednesday, July 11, 2018, Board Room, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. Lisa Moble From: timlynch@generaloutdoor.com Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 1:40 PM To: Lisa Mobley Subject: AB 1405 Gut and Amend Attachments: AB 1405 (Mullin) - League Oppose.pdf; AB 1405 oppose letter (Beall).doc Lisa, attached is the league of cities letter of opposition along with a "template" letter for local authorities to use to make sure this BAD "gut and amend" bill is defeated at the Senate Transportation committee that will probably be heard by the committee on June 19th, so time is of the essence to get these letters out (Eastvale has already sent one in as have numerous other cities through out the state). Thank you s0000 much for your help. Tim 1 LSEAERAN IA G U CITIES May 23, 2018 The Honorable Kevin Mullin California State Assembly State Capitol Building, Room 3160 Sacramento, CA 95814 1400 K Street, Suite 400 • Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916.658.8200 Fax: 916.658.8240 www.cacities.org RE: AB 1405 (Mullin). Advanced Digital Network Act. Notice of OPPOSITION Dear Assembly Member Mullin: The League of California Cities must regretfully Oppose your AB 1405, which would allow for commercial advertising on the state highway right-of-way. Content displayed on digital signs in the public right-of-way have been rightfully limited to public safety messages and directional traffic alerts as to not degrade the effectiveness of those signs during emergencies, Amber Alerts, vehicle accidents, natural disasters, weather warnings and construction -related activity. Not only would commercial advertising become an added layer of distraction on our highways, but it could also lead to drivers ignoring critically important safety information from over - saturation of the signage system. The League firmly believes that only the most critical safety and traffic information should be displayed to drivers to help alleviate congestion and improve highway safety. Commercial advertisements displayed on the highway right-of-way have no public safety or traffic improvement purposes. Digital and static signage placed on local government property within close enough proximity to be visible from the state right of way requires both state and local permitting approval. Under existing law, local governments ensure public input from their residents regarding the design, size, illumination, and location of these signs to mitigate aesthetic and environmental impacts. Unfortunately, AB 1405 would cut local communities out of this process. While some local jurisdictions have adopted bans of outdoor digital signs within their cities, this bill would alternatively allow Caltrans to place signs along segments of the highway adjacent to these cities despite such bans, effectively circumventing the will of those communities. Conversely, some local governments enter into public -private partnerships for digital and static signage that benefit local communities and businesses. This bill would make it economically challenging for local businesses to compete with signage on the state highway system, potentially putting these local partnerships at -risk, resulting in a zero -sum game. May 10, 2018 The Honorable Jim Beall Chairman, Senator Richard Roth and Assembly Member Sabrina Cervantes Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: Assembly Bill 1405 (Mullin) -OPPOSE Dear Chairman Beall: On behalf of , I am writing to respectfully inform you of our strong OPPOSITION to AB 1405. Since 1933, Caltrans has statutorily prohibited advertising within the state highway right-of-way. This public policy has played major role in keeping our highways safe, preserving their beauty and creating a level playing field for the outdoor advertising industry. Content displayed on changeable message signs in the public right-of-way has been rightfully limited to public safety messages, directional traffic alerts and Amber Alerts as to not degrade the effectiveness of those signs. AB 1450 aims to remove this restriction by allowing for the full commercialization of the state highway right- of-way. Specifically, AB 1405 eliminates city and county discretionary review for digital outdoor signs installed next to public highways and adjacent neighborhoods and shuts the public out of the review process as it relates to the zoning, size, placement and population of these digital signs anywhere in California. AB 1405 would also preclude a city or county from negotiating agreements that provide in -kind public benefits, such as on -going revenue to support public safety initiatives and after -school programs in exchange for the use of public property. The regulatory structure that governs the outdoor advertising industry is complex and must consider federal, state and local regulation. We recognize that certain communities have adopted policies to restrict the number of outdoor signs that can be erected. How does AB 1405 seek to integrate locally adopted billboard regulations and policies? AB 1450 also fails to address the concerns as they relate to the cities and counties that have adopted moratoria that prevent the construction of new billboards and displays. Municipalities that enter into agreements with outdoor advertisers benefit from the competition amongst billboard companies; who compete with each other to offer the most value. The demonstration project authorized under AB 1405 would grant the winning concessionaire full access to real estate that has been historically reserved for public safety messages. We fear these new digital signs proposed along the highway will saturate the industry depressing future values, threatening existing tax revenue and forcing many full-time workers out of the business. AB 1405 would give Caltrans the authorization to initiate a digital sign demonstration project on the state highway system, which is a clear violation of the federal Highway Beautification Act (HBA). This violation could trigger a penalty of up to 10% or $490 million of California's share of federal highway trust fund allocation. The threat of withholding nearly $500 million in federal transportation dollars on the heels of the historic passage of the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 will run the risk of delaying a number of priority state transportation projects throughout the state. It should be noted that the FHWA has never granted a federal HBA waiver, and the current Secretary of Transportation has a record of rejecting requests and has even took steps to withhold federal transportation funds from the State of New York for the unauthorized placement of highway signs. Clearly, the potential penalties for this unauthorized state highway sign program will far exceed the projected revenues promised by AB 1405. supports legislative measures that promote a robust and equitable billboard industry in California. Unfortunately, AB 1405 is not such a measure. The bill promises to place control over government -owned property in the hands of a few businesses, fails to compensate local communities fairly and threatens half a billion dollars in federal transportation funds. We must respectfully maintain our strong opposition to AB 1405 as it is currently written. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, (Name and company) Cc: Members, Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Assemblymember Kevin Mullin Ronda Paschal, Office of Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. Brian C. Annis, California Department of Transportation Michael Cohen, Department of Finance 1100 K Street Suite 101 Sacramento California 95814 rdePhafte 916.327.75M kook 916.441.5507 California State o iotion o ® June 5, 2018 The Honorable Kevin Mullin California State Assembly State Capitol, Room 3160 Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: AB 1405 (Mullin) — Advanced Digital Network Act As Amended February 26, 2018 — OPPOSE Dear Assembly Member Mullin, el) The California State Association of Counties (CSAC) regrets to inform you of our opposition to your AB 1405 which would allow commercial advertising within the state highway right,of--way• Under existing law, both digital and static outdoor signage on local government property requires a local permit. If a proposed digital or static outdoor sign on local properly is close enough to the state highway right-of-way to be visible from the state highway a state permit must also be obtained. The existing process allows for meaningful input from local communities on proposed outdoor signage including on factors such as size, illumination, design, and the location of the signs. It is important for a local government to be able to exercise its inherent land use authority over proposed outdoor signage so environmental and aesthetic impacts can be appropriate contemplated, and to the extend desirable by the community, mitigated, Current taw also allows local governments to place bans on certain outdoor advertising to reflect an individual community's character and desires for its built environment. AS 1405 would eliminate local discretionary review of digital outdoor signs and eliminate public input regarding associated impacts by allowing outdoor digital signs in the state rightof-way. While some local governments allow widespread adoption of digital and static outdoor signage, others have chosen to limit the size, design, and location of outdoor advertisements. Moreover, some counties and cities have exercised their authority and banned outdoor digital advertising. CSAC supports existing authority that allows counties to regulate the zoning, placement and population of digital signs in their communities. For these reasons, CSAC must respectfully oppose AS 1405. If you need additional information about our position, please do not hesitate contact me at 916.650,8185 or kvalttrititwAppunties.org. Sincerely, VdtA:6Kit) Kiana L. Valentine Senior Legislative Representative SENATE TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING Chief Consultant: Randy Chinn. Principal Consultants: Erin Rim and finny Loon.Consultant: Aas n1 . nIn and Cif Chisholm, Phone: (916) 1-4121. R +��r BILLS HEARD IN FILE ORDER. Fax 1) REPUBLICAN � Ted May (Trans) 651 1 �, Yoram O u ) 1 ,POLICY T m� Mee -Chair) �r �le t ho 0 010 051 41 010 051 4005 9.46 stsi r SENATE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT AND RETIREMENT Dr. Richard Pan, Chair 2017 - 2018 Regular Bill No: Author: Version: Urgency: Consultant: AB 1912 Rodriguez 5/9/18 As amended No Glenn Miles Hearing Date: 6/11/18 Fiscal: Yes SUBJECT: Public employees' retirement: joint powers agreements: liability. SOURCE: Service Employees International Union, California ASSEMBLY VOTES: Assembly Floor: Assembly Appropriations Committee: Assembly Public Employees, Retirement, and Social Security Committee: 49 - 27 12-4 S-0 DIGEST: This bill prohibits member agencies of a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) from disclaiming the JPA's retirement liability if the JPA contracts with a public employee retirement system; requires JPA member agencies to mutually agree to apportion the JPA's retirement liability for existing contracts with a public employee retirement system; and prohibits the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) from contracting with a JPA on and after January 1, 2019, unless the contract requires that the JPA member agencies accept joint and several liability for the JPA's Ca1PERS obligations. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1) Permits a public agency to contract with Ca1PERS for purposes of administering retirement and other benefits on behalf of the agency's employees, and prohibits a public agency from contracting with CaIPERS within three years of the termination of a previous contract with the system. AB 1912 (Rodriguez) Page 2 of 10 2) Authorizes two or more public agencies, upon authorization by their respective legislative or other governing bodies, to jointly exercise any power common to the contracting parties to the contracting parties creating a JPA, and that the JPA created is a public entity separate from the parties to the agreement that created the JPA. 3) Provides that if the agency is not one or more of the parties to the agreement but is a public entity, commission, or board constituted pursuant to the agreement, the debts, liabilities, and obligations of the agency shall be debts, liabilities, and obligations of the parties to the agreement, unless the agreement specifies otherwise. However, a party to the agreement may separately contract for, or assume responsibility for, specific debts, liabilities, or obligations of the agency. 4) Provides that if a contracting agency fails for 30 days after a demand by CaIPERS to pay the full installment of contributions required by its contract with the system, or fails for three months after the demand, or if CaIPERS determines that the contracting agency no longer exists, CaIPERS may terminate the contract by resolution adopted by a majority vote of the board, effective 60 days after notice of its adoption has been mailed by registered mail to the governing body of the contracting agency. 5) Permits CaIPERS to negotiate with the governing board of the terminating agency or the governing body of any agency that may assume any portion of the liabilities of the terminating agency, and the terms and conditions of the termination and payment of unfunded liabilities. This also applies to inactive contracting agencies or an inactive member category, as determined by Ca1PERS. 6) Requires a terminated agency to be liable to Ca1PERS for any deficit in funding for earned benefits, interest at the actuarial determined rate from the date of termination to the date the agency pays the system, and for other certain costs. In addition, CaIPERS must place a lien on the assets of the terminating contracting agency, subject to a prior lien for wages, in an amount equal to the actuarially determined deficit in funding for earned benefits. 7) Requires Ca1PERS, at a terminating agency's request, to enter into an agreement with the terminating agency's governing body to ensure that the final compensation used in calculating its employees' benefits is calculated in the same manner as used for calculating the benefits of nonterminating agencies' employees, whether or not the terminating agency's employees retire directly from the terminating agency or continue in employment in other public service, AB 1912 (Rodriguez) Page 3 of 10 and permits CaIPERS to make adjustments to the employer's contribution rates to ensure the adequate funding of benefits, as specified. 8) Requires CaIPERS to reduce a terminating agency employees' benefits by an actuarially determined equivalent as a percentage if the agency fails to pay the actuarially determined amount owed to the system. This bill: 1) Makes legislative findings and declarations as specified. Provisions applicable to contracts with all public retirement systems as specified: 2) Eliminates existing authority for JPA member agencies to disclaim the JPA's retirement liability if the JPA contracts with a public employee retirement system. 3) Defines "public retirement system" to mean any pension or retirement system of a public employer, including, but not limited to, an independent retirement plan offered by a public employer that the public employer participates in or offers to its employees for the purpose of providing retirement benefits, or a system of benefits for public employees that is governed by Section 401(a) of Title 26 of the United States Code. 4) Requires the member agencies, both current and former, of existing JPAs to reach mutual agreement to apportion the retirement liability of the JPA if the JPA contracts with a public retirement system for retirement benefits. If the member agencies are unable to mutually agree, the board of the public employee retirement system may apportion the liability based on specified criteria. However, if the member agencies of the JPA are able to mutually agree thereafter, that agreement will supersede the public employee retirement system's apportionment determination. Provisions applicable to contracts with CaIPERS only: 5) Prohibits Ca1PERS, as of January 1, 2019, from contracting with a JPA unless the contract requires that the JPA member agencies accept joint and several liability for the JPA's Ca1PERS obligations. (However, the bill does not prohibit other public retirement systems from contracting with a JPA unless the contract provides for joint and several liability. Presumably, those other public retirement systems with new contracts on or after January 1, 2019, would still AB 1912 (Rodriguez) Page 4 of 10 be subject to the bills requirement to apportion liability among the member agencies.) 6) Extends liability to all parties to a terminating JPA for any deficit in funding for earned retirement benefits, as specified, and provides CaIPERS with a lien on the assets of all parties to the terminating JPA, subject only to a prior lien for wages, to satisfy those retirement obligations, as specified, including fees, interest, and legal costs. 7) Requires Ca1PERS, upon a request of a terminating JPA or any of its member agencies, to enter into an agreement to ensure that the JPA's employees final compensation calculation will be calculated in the same manner as those of employees whose agencies are not terminating and to make necessary adjustments to the employer contribution rate prior to the termination date to ensure that benefits are adequately funded or agree to any other actuarially sound payment technique. a) Requires a JPA terminating agency to notify Ca1PERS 1 to 3 years prior to its termination date of its intent to enter into this agreement to maintain its employees' benefits, as specified. b) Allows Ca1PERS not to enter into the agreement if it determines that it is not in the best interest of the retirement system. c) Provides that if the JPA or its member agencies do not enter into an agreement to maintain employee benefits, as specified, the JPA or member agencies shall assume the retirement obligations on their retirement systems. (It is unclear what the author intends by this wording but Committee staff believe the intent is that where certain member agencies have an alternative public retirement system to Ca1PERS such as an independent public system or a system established under the 1937 Act, the member agencies must accept a transfer of JPA liabilities from Ca1PERS to the alternative public retirement system). 8) Eliminates existing law that gives CaIPERS' discretion to not impose a reduction or to impose a lesser reduction on a plan that has been terminated if CaIPERS has made all reasonable efforts to collect the amount necessary to fully fund the plan's liabilities and Ca1PERS fords that not reducing the benefits, or imposing a lesser reduction, will not impact the actuarial soundness of the terminated agency pool. AB 1912 (Rodriguez) Page 5 of 10 9) Requires Ca1PERS to consider and exhaust all options and necessary actions prior to reducing a retirement benefit of a terminated plan whose assets are not sufficient to cover the plan liabilities, including evaluating whether to bring a civil action to recover monies to mitigate a reduction of a retirement benefit. Background According to the author, As a public agency, a JPA may contract with Ca1PERS to administer the retirement benefits of the JPA's employees. While JPA's are public agencies, their sources of revenue are limited as well as their ability to increase revenue. Last year, Ca1PERS reduced the retirement benefits of almost 200 employees ofthe East San Gabriel Valley Human Service Consortium — a JPA —after its sole source of revenue was terminated. The JPA terminated all if its employees, was unable to pay its retirement obligations to Ca1PERS, and became insolvent. In response to a CaIPERS demand for payment of the JPA's retirement obligations from the member agencies that established the JPA —the Cities of Azusa, Covina, Glendora and West Covina —the member agencies cited existing JPA law, contract, and case law to supporttheir position that they were not responsible for the JPA's retirement obligations. Since payment for the JPA's retirement obligations could not be obtained from the JPA nor its member agencies, and without financial, statutory or legal recourse, the retirement benefits ofthe JPAs retirees were reduced by approximately 63 percent. There are other JPA's that currently contract with Ca1PERS whose employees and retirees could see a similar occurrence if the JPA becomes financially distressed or insolvent, absent surety ofthe financial health ofthe JPA by its member agencies related to retirement obligations. Related/Prior Legislation None known. FISCAL EFFECT: Appropriation: Yes Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No AB 1912 (Rodriguez) Page 6 of 10 SUPPORT: Service Employees International Union, California (source) American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO Association of California State Supervisors California Association of Professional Scientists California Association of Highway Patrolmen California School Employees Association, AFL-CIO California State Retirees Laborers' International Union of North American, Local 792 Orange County Professional Firefighters Association, Local 3631 Peace Officers Research Association of California Professional Engineers in California Government Retired Public Employees Association OPPOSITION: Alameda County Transportation Commission Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency California Association of Joint Powers Authorities California Association of Recreational Park Districts California Authority of Racing Fairs California Fire Chiefs Association California Contract Cities Association California Special Districts Association California State Association of Counties City of Alhambra City of American Canyon City of Anderson City of Angels Camp City of Arroyo Grande City of Artesia City of Azusa City of Belmont City of Burbank City of Burlingame City of Camarillo City of Chino Hills City of Cloverdale City of Concord City of Corte Madera City of Covina AB 1912 (Rodriguez) Page 7 of 10 City of Eastvale City of Eureka City of Fortuna City of Foster City City of Fountain Valley City of Glendora City of Goleta City of Grand Terrace City of Gustine City of Hayward City of Hesperia City of Highland City of Huntington Beach City of Indian Wells City of La Canada Flintridge City of La Mirada City of Laguna Hills City of Lakeport City of Lakewood City of Los Alamitos City of Manteca City of Martinez City of Mill Valley City of Moorpark City o f Murrieta City ofNorwalk City of Oakdale City of Ojai City of Orinda City of Pacific Grove City of Palmdale City of Palos Verdes Estates City of Pasadena City of Pittsburg City of Portola Valley City of Rancho Cucamonga City ofRancho Palos Verdes City of Rancho Santa Margarita City of Rocklin City of Ross City of San Carlos City of San Luis Obispo AB 1912 (Rodriguez) Page 8 of 10 City of San Marcos City of San Mateo County of Riverside City of Sausalito City of Soledad City of Sunnyvale City of Thousand Oaks City of Tulelake City of Tustin City of Vernon City of Villa Park City of Walnut Creek City of West Covina City of Whittier City of Yucca Valley County of Santa. Clara Fire Districts Association of California King City LA Regional Interoperable Communications System Authority League of California Cities Lodi Chamber of Commerce Los Angeles County Marina County Council of Mayors and Councilmembers Northern California Power Agency Orange County Cities Redwood City Riverside County Riverside County Division League of Cities Sand City Silicon Valley Clean Water JPA Stopwaste Urban Counties of California Ventura County Transportation Commission Western Fairs Association ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: According to the sponsor, As a public agency, a JPA may contract with CaIPERS to administer the retirement benefits of the JPA's employees. Last year, CaIPERS reduced the retirement benefits of nearly 200 employees of the East San Gabriel Valley Human Service Consortium, a JPA, after its sole source of revenue was AB 1912 (Rodriguez) Page 9 of 10 terminated. The JPA terminated all of its employees, was unable to pay its retirement obligations to CaIPERS, and became insolvent... AB 1912 would address this by requiring a JPA's member agencies to be jointly and severally liable for the retirement obligations of the JPA if it contracts with Ca1PERS for administrative retirement benefits ... Workers and retirees should not have to worry about their retirement benefits being drastically reduced. According to AFCSME, "AB 1912 seeks to provide retirement security to JPA employees and retirees" as the bill "amends current JPA law by prohibiting member agencies from disclaiming liability for the JPA's retirement liability." According to the Retired Public Employees Association, the California Association of Professional Scientists, the California Association of Highway Patrolmen, and the Peace Officers Research Association of California, This bill is also consistent with the State Auditor's recommendation in its findings in their report... (regarding South Orange County Wastewater Authority) which recommended, among other things that "the Legislature should require new JPA agreements to hold the members responsible for the JPA's unfunded retirement obligations." ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: According to a coalition of public employers and public employer associations, including the League of California Cities, the California Special Districts Association, the California State Association of Counties among others, (Regarding costs), AB 1912 places substantial burdens and costly unworkable requirements on local agencies as well as the State of California by applying retroactive, apportioned liability as well as prospective joint and several liability for all retirement related obligations to any current or former member of a JPA throughout its existence... (Regarding constitutional concerns related to local agency debt limits), by applying retroactive apportioned liability to existing contracts, we have strong concerns that local agencies will incur significant reportable debts or obligations that may exceed our annual revenue without receiving voter approval —thus violating the (cited constitutional) provision.... AB 1912 (Rodriguez) Page 10 of 10 (Regarding the complexity of equitably apportioning liability), JPAs have been in existence in California for nearly 100 years with state and local agencies. Some JPAs have as many as 500 members entering and exiting as service demands shift and evolve. It would be virtually impossible for the JPA's governmental body, let alone a retirement system, to retroactively assign "equitable" retirement specific liabilities to potentially hundreds of agencies... (Regarding GASB reporting requirements), incurring retroactive debt would require each originating agency of a JPA to report these liabilities as debts impacting an agency's net financial position. A drastic spike in liability could contribute to the downgrading of an agency's credit rating, which in turn would make issuing and servicing future bonds more costly through higher interest costs and additional required insurance. AGENDA ITEM 5 MINUTES RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MINUTES Wednesday, May 9, 2018 1. CALL TO ORDER The Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chair Dana Reed at 9:30 a.m. in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent Marion Ashley Victoria Baca Ben J. Benoit Brian Berkson Randall Bonner John Bulinski Joseph DeConinck Kathleen Fitzpatrick Deborah Franklin Berwin Hanna Steven Hernandez Jim Hyatt Kevin Jeffries Kathleen Kelly Linda Krupa Bob Magee Lisa Middleton Michael Naggar V. Manuel Perez Greg Pettis Dana Reed Adam Rush* Karen Spiegel John F. Tavaglione Michael M. Vargas Chuck Washington Ted Weill Lloyd White Neil Winter Rusty Bailey Rick Gibbs Andrew Kotyuk Scott Matas Michael Wilson *Arrived after meeting was called to order 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Clerk of the Board Lisa Mobley, led the Commission in a flag salute. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS Chair Reed indicated May 9t" is a very special day for the county of Riverside and referred to Board of Supervisors' Chair Chuck Washington to make the announcement. Commissioner Washington announced it is an honor to serve as Chair for the Riverside County Board of Supervisors (BOS). In recognition of the 125 years as a county, the BOS Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 2 will be rolling out a year's worth of celebrations and recognitions, both of the beginning of the County and how the County separated from San Bernardino County and San Diego County to form their own County. He explained the vote was on May 2, 1893, and a week later on May 9th the County was formed. Commissioner Washington discussed how there were five elected County BOS and its five districts. He invited everyone to participate in the County BOS celebrations and for the success of Riverside County. Chair Reed congratulated everyone that is associated with the County and expressed gratitude for breaking away from San Bernardino and San Diego Counties. Executive Director Anne Mayer presented Records Technician Allie Rackerby with a 10-year service award. Tim Lynch, General Outdoor Advertising, explained having come to a Commission meeting a few years ago to get help in regards to the State Route 91 Project that would eliminate his small company's valuable assets. Mr. Lynch expressed gratitude as a little over a year later the Commission help save his billboard advertising company. He then referred to AB 1405 (Mullin) that was distributed to the Commissioners, which is a gut and amend bill and it is going before the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee in June 2018. Mr. Lynch expressed AB 1405 will jeopardize his billboard advertising company and also every city/county represented as this bill takes away the rights to control billboard development on freeways and highways and gives it solely to Caltrans. He referred to the AB 1405 hand out and suggested the Commission use the four recommendations listed to try to prevent this bill from getting any further than the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee in June. Chair Reed reminded the Commission the Brown Act does not allow to take action on public requests, however staff is aware and will work on a recommendation. Chair Reed announced the date for the approval of the minutes was incorrect as it should be for the April 11, 2018 minutes, which the April 11 minutes are included in the May Commission agenda. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —APRIL 11, 2018 M/S/C (Vargas/Washington) to approve the April 11, 2018 minutes as submitted. Abstain: V. Manuel Perez Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 3 6. PUBLIC HEARING — PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 Michele Cisneros, Deputy Director of Finance, presented the proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2018/19, highlighting the following areas: • Budget process; • FY 2018/19 Budget considerations, adjustments, and summary; • Sources and expenditure by breakdown and comparison; • Capital department expenditure highlights; • Functional expenditures breakdown and comparison; and • Next steps. At this time, Chair Reed opened the public hearing and asked for public comments. There were no requests to speak. M/S/C to continue the public hearing for the proposed Budget for FY 2018/19 to the Commission meeting on June 13, 2018. 7. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS Chair Reed announced there was a minor revision to Agenda Item 11, "State Route 91 Corridor Operations Project and Traffic and Revenue Study Update and Request for Various Authorizations". 8. CONSENT CALENDAR At this time, Commissioner Lloyd White requested to pull Agenda Item 8C, "State and Federal Legislative Update", for further discussion. M/S/C (Kelly/Baca) to approve the following Consent Calendar items. 8A. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Receive and file the Single Signature Authority report for the third quarter ended March 31, 2018. 8B. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 18-005 FOR CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES DISASTER FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE Adopt Resolution No. 18-005, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Designating Commission Agents to Act on Behalf of the Commission for the Execution of Assurances and Agreements with the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services Pertaining to State Disaster Financial Assistance". Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 4 8D. BUDGET ADJUSTMENT FOR SB 132 PROJECTS — JURUPA ROAD GRADE SEPARATION, HAMNER AVENUE BRIDGE, AND INTERSTATE 15/LIMONITE AVENUE INTERCHANGE Approve an adjustment to the Fiscal Year 2017/18 budget of $1 million to increase SB 132 revenues and expenditures for the Jurupa Road Grade Separation, Hamner Avenue Bridge, and Interstate 15/Limonite Avenue Interchange projects. 8E. CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY FUNDING INCREASE FOR TEMECULA PARK & RIDE FACILITY Approve Agreement No. 14-72-135-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 14- 72-135-00, with the city of Temecula to increase Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds from $1,300,750 to $1,908,031 to construct the park & ride facility at La Paz Street. 8F. AMENDMENT TO THE 1-15 EXPRESS LANES PROJECT DESIGN -BUILD SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SKANSKA-AMES, A JOINT VENTURE, FOR THE 15/91 EXPRESS LANES CONNECTOR PROJECT 1) Approve Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 16-31-057-00 for the 1-15 Express Lanes Project (1-15 ELP) with Skanska-Ames, a Joint Venture, (Skanska-Ames) to perform preliminary engineering design and geotechnical work in support of the Interstate 15/State Route 91 Express Lanes Connector Project (15/91 ELC) in the amount of $4,718,800, plus a contingency amount of $471,200, for a total amount of $5,190,000; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the amendment on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total amount not to exceed as required for the project; and 4) Approve an adjustment of $1.5 million to the Fiscal Year 2017/18 budget to increase state revenues and design builder expenditures. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 5 8G. CHANGE ORDER TO AMEND THE 1-15 EXPRESS LANES PROJECT DESIGN -BUILD CONTRACT WITH SKANSKA-AMES, A JOINT VENTURE, FOR THE FIBER OPTIC COMMUNICATION NETWORK CONNECTION TO THE REGIONAL OPERATIONS CENTER 1) Approve Change Order No. 7 to Agreement No. 16-31-057-00 for the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project (1-15 ELP) with Skanska-Ames, a Joint Venture, (Skanska-Ames) to design and construct the fiber optic communication network connection between the 1-15 Express Lanes and the 1-15 Express Lanes Regional Operations Center (ROC) in the amount of $421,065, plus a contingency amount of $42,000, for a total amount not to exceed $463,065; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the change order amendment on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for the project; and 4) Approve an adjustment of $100,000 to the Fiscal Year 2017/18 budget to increase design -builder expenditures. 8H. COMMUTER RAIL GRANT RESOLUTION Adopt Resolution No. 18-006, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Regarding Authorization for the Execution of the Certifications and Assurances and Authorized Agent Forms for the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program for the Perris Valley Line FY 2018/19 Operations Project in the Amount of $861,106". 81. AGREEMENTS FOR FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL TOW TRUCK SERVICE 1) Award Agreement No. 18-45-131-00 to Coastal Pride Towing, Inc. for Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) tow truck services on State Route 91 Beat Nos. 1 and 2 for a three-year term, and one, two-year option to extend the agreement, in an amount of $3,382,442, plus a contingency amount of $169,122, for a total amount not to exceed $3,551,564; 2) Award Agreement No. 18-45-132-00 to Coastal Pride Towing, Inc. for FSP tow truck services on Interstate 215 Beat 20 and Interstate 15 Beat Nos. 34 and 35 for a three-year term, and one, two-year option to extend the agreement, in an amount of $2,464,956, plus a contingency amount of $123,248, for a total amount not to exceed $2,588,204; 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 6 4) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required for these services. 8J. QUARTERLY PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT METRICS REPORT Receive and file the Quarterly Public Engagement Metrics Report for January — March 2018. 9. CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SB 1 FUNDING PROGRAMS Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director, provided an update for the California Transportation Commission (CTC) staff recommendations for SB 1 Funding Programs. Anne Mayer expressed appreciation the Commission received funding allocated for the Interstate 15/Railroad Canyon Interchange project, which has been an important interchange for the city of Lake Elsinore and for this Commission. She noted that unfortunately Riverside County did not receive additional funding particularly for the State Route 71/91 Connector project although staff will continue to push this project forward. Anne Mayer emphasized SR-86/Avenue 50 Interchange in the city of Coachella is very important for the regional traffic from SR-86 and from a safety prospective. Staff is working closely with Caltrans, the CTC, and the city of Coachella to determine how to try to keep this project moving and get some funding for design. M/S/C to receive and file the California Transportation Commission (CTC) staff recommendations for SB1 Funding Programs. 10. PROPOSED METROLINK BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 Sheldon Peterson, Rail Manager, welcomed and introduced Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) Deputy Chief Executive Officer Elissa Konove and Ronnie Campbell Chief Financial Officer to present the proposed Metrolink Budget for Fiscal Year 2018/19. Ronnie Campbell presented Metrolink's proposed Budget for FY 2018/19, highlighting the following: • FY 2018/19 Budget priorities • Revenue allocation by member agency • FY 2018/19 proposed expenditures • Expense allocation and subsidy by member agency • FY 2018/19 Budget for rehabilitation and new capital • Next steps Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 7 In response to Commissioner Kevin Jeffries' inquiry about the $4 million in marketing and how it will help Riverside County, Mr. Campbell replied the $4 million is a targeted marketing plan. He explained the SCRRA Marketing Director Sabrina Davis has been reaching out through their Technical Advisory Committee and in discussions with agency staff on developing the marketing plan. Over the next couple of weeks, the plan is to engage member agencies with the details for the specific programs being designed for the specific rail lines and to bring it back to the June 6 and June 22 Metrolink Board Meetings with further details. Commissioner Jeffries expressed the dollar amount has been established and SCRRA will try to justify spending that much by figuring out what it is to be marketed so it seems somewhat backwards. Ronnie Campbell replied when this topic was presented at the February Metrolink Board Workshop there was details that support the numbers provided by the consultant at that time so the overall number on the marketing program is solid. As Metrolink works through the additional details that support the numbers, the Marketing Director Sabrina Davis will bring that forward and explain it in further detail. Anne Mayer explained the discussions regarding marketing have occurred at the monthly CEO meetings including discussions on how to help grow ridership at Metrolink. Sheldon Peterson, Transit Manager is a member of the Technical Advisory Committee and staff has seen for example some of the marketing that was done on the Perris Valley Line (PVL) as there were results from that. She would expect the focus would be on marketing to draw people to the PVL, the 91 Line, the Inland Empire -Orange County Line, and the Riverside Line. Anne Mayer expressed there is solid ridership but it could be better and she discussed some of the marketing techniques that have been used, which were useful. She stated in discussions with Metrolink staff there is a need to see performance measurements if the Commission is going to invest in marketing as what actually brings aditional riders to the lines is the goal. Commissioner Debbie Franklin concurred with Anne Mayer's comments and stated that as a member of the SCRRA Board there has been several conversations regarding the marketing dollars and the overall budget. She explained the members have asked some very hard questions of staff and requested measurements throughout the process throughout the year to be able to confirm the dollars that are being put in different areas are actually seeing the results anticipated. Commissioner Franklin expressed the members will notify the Commission if the numbers are not coming out the way they are supposed to. Anne Mayer suggested scheduling a presentation at a future Commission meeting regarding the marking plan and what was done so far if that would be of interest. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 8 M/S/C (Berkson/Vargas) to: 1) Receive and file a report on the Commission's portion of the Fiscal Year 2018/19 Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) operating and capital budget; 2) Approve the FY 2018/19 SCRRA operating and capital budget, which results in a total operating and capital subsidy of $29,959,705 from the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director to enter into Memorandum of Understanding No. 18-25-134-00 with SCRRA regarding annual funding, including subrecipient matters related to pass -through of federal funding. Anne Mayer expressed appreciation to the Commissioners for approving the Metrolink Budget and to Elissa Konove and Ronnie Campbell for attending the Commission meeting and for their partnership. She highlighted that Metrolink was allocated $876 million last week by the California Transportation Agency from the Transit and Intercity Rail Program. Anne Mayer explained the share of funding the Commission receives goes towards the capital improvements at the Downtown Riverside Commuter Rail Station of an additional platform. She explained from a system standpoint one of the major challenges Metrolink faced over the past 10 years was to focus on positive train control (PTC) and implementing PTC, which is where the funding went. She explained how there is a backlog of rehabilitation needs in the system for the equipment, the rolling stock, and the basic track services, which is causing costs to go up. She expressed the more other funding is put into the Metrolink system the less the Commission has to subsidize. She discussed the bottleneck issues with the Rosecrans-Marquardt grade separation in Los Angeles County for expanding service in and out of Riverside County. She expressed with this funding it will be wide enough and triple tracking can be completed, which means more trains can run on this line. 11. STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR OPERATIONS PROJECT AND TRAFFIC AND REVENUE STUDY UPDATE AND REQUEST FOR VARIOUS AUTHORIZATIONS Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director, presented the State Route 91 Corridor Operations Project and traffic and revenue study update, highlighting the following areas: At this time, Commissioner Adam Rush joined the meeting. • Work performed since December: o Analyzed corridor traffic before and after the 91 Project opening o Identified 91 Corridor "Hot Spots" o Engineered project options o Analyzed project options Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 9 o Established criteria to evaluate options o Formed recommendations • Express Lanes entrance at Interstate 15 northbound recommendation: o Staff recommendation: Full implementation of Option 1 o Extend express lane entrance south o Why option 1? o Reduces impact to general purpose (GP) lanes from queuing out of the express lanes o No impact to the 1-15 ELP o Negligible impact to toll revenue o Cost and short-term implementation schedule: Cost $284,000, Schedule: Six months • 91 General purpose lanes westbound near the County Line recommendation: o Staff recommendation: Full implementation of Option 3 o Restripe the existing ingress/egress areas to a continuous weave lane o Why option 3? o Improves GP lane traffic: speed, travel time, volume o Anticipated acceptable impact to toll revenue o Cost and short-term implementation schedule: Cost $386,000, Schedule: Nine months • Ramp meter at westbound Green River Road recommendation: o Staff recommendation: maintain existing ramp metering o Analyzed existing conditions o Travel benefits for Green River Road users: 4 minute savings, 2 mph speed improvement o Minimal change to 91 Corridor operations o Safety concerns with ramp merge • Caltrans consultation: o Fatal flaw review of options o Options 4, 5, and 6 would not be approved: narrowed lanes and shoulders; emergency vehicles; vehicle breakdowns; length of undesirable (non- standard) conditions o Modifying Option 4 to become more acceptable: wider lanes and shoulders; reconstructing shoulder; 7' pavement widening; estimated project cost: $30-$50 million • GP lanes westbound near the County Line recommendation: o Staff recommendation: implement modified Option 4 in two steps 1) Immediately begin project scoping, environmental studies, and final design 2) Return fall 2018 with construction recommendation with known toll revenue impacts o Staff recommendation: update the 2012 91 Traffic and Revenue Study o Why Option 4 modified? Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 10 o Improves GP lane traffic: speed, travel time, volume o Comparable benefits to Option 5, but with less impacts o Less impact to express lanes than Option 6 o Step 1— Cost: $3.2 million, Schedule: 18 months o Step 2 — Return fall 2018 with construction recommendation • Procurements and contracts: o What we heard: implement quickly; seeking more authority; ability to use existing contracts o Amend existing professional services contracts: project and construction management: Parsons - $3,192,000; Staff augmentation: Bechtel Corporation - $300,000; and Traffic and Revenue Study update: Stantec - $500,000; o Amend existing construction contracts or conduct competitive construction contract procurement(s): o Construction Option 1: Skanska-Ames - $478,000 1-15 NB EL Option 10 $192,000 91 WB GP Option 3 - $286,000 o Construction Option 2: future competitive procurement - $398,000 1-15 NB EL Option 1- $160,000 91 WB GP Option 3 - $238,000 • Surplus Toll revenue: o Staff recommendation: Use surplus toll revenue All work necessary to implement the improvements Estimate $4,470,000 o What is it? o 91 Express Lanes surplus toll revenue o Return in fall 2018 with surplus revenue plan • Agency agreements: o Staff recommendation: authorize execution of agency agreements; agency -to -agency agreements; new agreements or amendments; cover all phases of project development; and potential agreements with Caltrans, OCTA, CHP, etc. • Ongoing policy considerations: o Corridor focus for improvements; traffic and revenue study update, work closely with Caltrans and CHP; motorist safety; and 1-15 ELP: no impact At this time, Commissioner Michael Naggar left the meeting. Amie Kinne, Temescal Valley resident, expressed appreciation this item is on the agenda and that the Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee approved it. She expressed concern the traffic impacts have spread into the streets of the city of Corona. Ms. Kinne explained it caught her attention when staff was going over the report that if a constituent hears there needs to be a study to the impacts to the revenue to Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 11 determine if the problem can be fixed and she understands that revenue has to be considered. However to make a decision based on losing $24 million surplus in the first 15 months that will not be as great to make these fixes. She expressed support for staff's recommendation and suggested to continue to move forward in looking at the impacts to Green River Road. Ms. Kinne understands this is a work in progress however, the residents of Corona, Riverside, and Temescal Valley have really felt an impact and she appreciates the effort. Don Fuller, representing Greater Corona Traffic Alliance, displayed a photo of the daily traffic that occurs in the Corona area where vehicles are travelling down the wrong side of the road. He noted when the construction was going on he was a proponent for this 91 Project and discussed attending and speaking at the city of Corona City Council meetings. He expressed concern the 91 Project is a disaster and after spending $1.4 billion to build about 20 bridges, add traffic lanes, and tear up the town for several years it made it worse. Mr. Fuller expressed there does not need to be a study to find out where the problem areas are on the westbound Green River Road entrance. He suggested having some appropriation of funds to address the choke point at SR-91 westbound and a plan to take care of the auxiliary lane to get from Green River Road to SR-241. Mr. Fuller stated he is not certain if this is the Commission's responsibility and discussed the issues with the sequence of the rubber pylons that separate the express lanes from the general purpose lanes on SR-91 coming through the canyon as the vehicles run right over them after they pass the toll booths causing some serious crashes. Fauzia Rizvi, representing the Greater Corona Traffic Alliance, stated as Don Fuller mentioned she appreciates the Commission is moving forward with some of the long- term solutions, but Green River Road is a mess. She expressed there needs to be a solution and she was disappointed that staff did not recommend the changes at Green River Road. She stated that as a commuter she could sit in traffic for 45 minutes just to get five miles. Ms. Rizvi explained paying $25.00 to use the express lanes to get to work, she decided to get off at Green River Road on the way back from work, and it took her one hour to get home. She expressed Green River Road is a very important part of the 91 corridor and it is a mess. She suggested the Commission find a solution today in order to move forward with it. Joe Morgan, a Corona resident, stated during the 91 Project he attended all the city of Corona City Council meetings and saw Toll Project Manager David Thomas and Anne Mayer. He explained throughout the 91 Project the Corona residents were told this was a $2 billion project and through efficiencies, bidding, procurement, and design -build the Commission will get it done for $1.4 billion. Mr. Morgan expressed as soon as the 91 Project was completed immediately conditions got worse in Corona and traffic exploded on the city streets. He stated the Commission promised the public one thing and yet delivered a different thing that does not work. He suggested the Commission get it fixed and replace some of the elements that were taken out. Mr. Morgan expressed gratitude Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 12 to Commissioner Kevin Jeffries as his candor and willingness to speak the truth is very refreshing, and he deeply appreciates that Commissioner Jeffries opened the doors. Mr. Morgan expressed there were magical things that came together to get to a point where this happened and Caltrans helped in getting them actual plans that allowed an engineer to put together a proposal. Through countless hours of hard work from the Greater Corona Traffic Alliance and speaking with various Commissioners this is just the beginning, as this project needs to be completed. Michele Wentworth, representing the Greater Corona Traffic Alliance, expressed how much Option 4A is desperately needed. Also, for the Commission to seriously consider what it would take to go to the SR-91 ultimate build at Green River Road to get the auxiliary lane added for the residents and for the rest of the commuters on the SR-91. She explained after hearing about heat maps and traffic studies for the 1-15 and SR-91 and what this really means, which is the AM commute times got longer. Ms. Wentworth expressed there is preconstruction traffic flow westbound SR-91 Serfas Club Drive to County Line at 4:00 a.m. driving 71 miles per hour (MPH) and post construction commuters are driving 25 MPH. At 5:00 a.m. preconstruction, it was at 45 MPH and post construction 14 MPH. She stated the problem is at SR-91 at Green River Road, and in order to get that traffic on the freeway the auxiliary lane is necessary due to the design of the express lanes as there is weaving going on. She expressed the Commission added backup at Green River Road that backs up to McKinley Avenue, and backup at the 1-15 and Magnolia Avenue that backs up to Lake Street. She expressed appreciation the Commission is listening, working with the Corona residents, and the Commission is moving towards solutions. She encouraged the Commission to look at the Options for 4A and look at the ultimate build as this is what was deferred out of the project but it is making a huge impact on everybody's lives in real terms. Commissioner John Tavaglione expressed appreciation with taking the time to present this at the Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee and staff's recommendations. He concurred with the amended Option 4 with the auxiliary lane and the other options that were put forth and requested Michael Blomquist to bring that up. He asked Anne Mayer at what point the Commission can move forward on this. Anne Mayer clarified at what point can the Commission move forward on Option 4 modified. In response to CommissionerTavaglione's inquiry for the recommendations that were put forth for Option 4, Anne Mayer replied if the Commission approves the recommendations staff will immediately move forward with Option 1 on I-15, which is to extend the lane by a mile and changing the striping in the weaving area at the County Line. Ms. Mayer explained the Commission will have to go through a design and approval processes, and modify agreements but those will move forward and will be implemented. For Option 4 modified if the Commission approves this option staff will immediately begin identifying Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 13 a project scope, the environmental requirements, and working with Caltrans on defining what the project would be as it would be required to widen the existing SR-91. Ms. Mayer stated staff would come back to the Commission in the fall with a recommendation. She discussed some of the factors and challenges that are dependent as to whether to proceed with the project or not. She referred to Ms. Kinne's comment about the issue for the traffic and revenue study and clarified staff will come back to the Commission with recommendations for the surplus revenue. Related to the Commission's revenue, this is not a money making venture and the Commission borrowed over $600 million to build this project. She stated that money paid for the express lanes and for the reconstructed interchanges so the Commission has debt and a TIFIA loan and they have to be paid back. Anne Mayer explained what needs to be gauged is whether the Commission can continue to pay its debt and meet the obligations financially with the implementation of Option 4 modified. The key issues will be what impact does it have to the Commission's existing debt and where do the funds come from to build it. Staff is recommending strategies that is out of the norm, but believe it is the best path to get it implemented as quickly as possible. Commissioner Tavaglione explained living and dealing with the 91 Project for a long time and expressed appreciation to the Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee and staff that put a lot of time into it. There is no perfect project but everything is completed and something ends up that may go wrong and then it gets fixed in the end and this needs to get fixed. Commissioner Tavaglione referred to Mr. Fuller depicting the photo of the daily traffic in Corona, which is unacceptable and it has been that way for a long time before the project and still after the project was completed. He recommended moving immediately on the two projects the Commission can move forward on and recommended to move forward with the analysis for the Green River Road. He explained over 15 years ago when the accelerated lane at Green River Road on SR-91 made a huge difference, which was right after the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) toll lanes were built. Commissioner Karen Spiegel referred to Governor's Appointee John Bulinski's comment that Caltrans did not initially seem interested with the meter at the Green River Road on ramp. Michael Blomquist replied he was providing feedback in consultation with Caltrans as they were not initially inclined to turn the meter off or change the meter timing in any substantial way. Commissioner Spiegel stated this is something that there was a trial during construction where there were meters that were turned off periodically. She asked John Bulinski if there is any way to do a trial to see if this would help eliminate some of the morning traffic issues. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 14 John Bulinski replied Caltrans is certainly open to do a trial period and to do it in a coordinated manner. He explained the issue is that there is congestion on SR-91 and there is a significant volume of traffic coming on SR-91 from Green River Road. Mr. Bulinski stated without an orderly, progressive method that Caltrans puts into place through ramp meters it creates additional congestion and a safety concern that has been observed at this location and at many other locations and that is why Caltrans utilizes the metering ramp program for that purpose. Commissioner Spiegel suggested the Commission to move forward on that. She explained at the Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee meeting, she discussed the accidents that seem to occur after Green River Road into the canyon noting there were accidents prior to the construction and they are continuing after the construction. She asked if there was any kind of research that was done. Michael Blomquist explained the striping utilized at the County Line in particular the eastbound direction was specially designed and it was done so for the unique situation at the County Line. This was done much like Commissioner Spiegel is proposing a trial of the on ramp meter and a trial with the state on the striping of the eastbound direction. He stated as a result of that trial period staff is gathering data including accident data at the County Line for the purposes of going back to that state committee to comment on that striping. He explained that corridor has changed dramatically before and after so the results from that data may be relevant. Commissioner Spiegel stated understanding there are more vehicles on the freeway with the lowest unemployment rate and more people are living in Riverside County and commuting out. She expressed when the SR-91 backs up the worst it is from an accident and if the Commission can get to the reason for the accident, in addition with everything else being worked on since there are more vehicles and capacity can only go so far. Commissioner Spiegel suggested whatever the Commission could do to reach that level of accidents through Corona all the way into Brea/Placentia area to get those accidents lessened there seems to be a better flow. Anne Mayer explained regarding the safety issues west of Green River Road, historically has always been the location where there have been accidents during preconstruction, during construction, and post construction. She discussed the original Option 4, which was evaluated that did not have standard shoulders, the concerns raised by Caltrans, and why staff is proposing a modified Option 4. Chair Reed stated the Commission has a number of questions for SR-91 that cannot be handled today, and suggested to have a workshop this summer to discuss all of SR-91 as this will not be resolved at this meeting. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 15 Commissioner Kevin Jeffries concurred with Commissioner Tavaglione's comments and expressed this has be fixed. He explained granted almost every city in this County is experiencing severe traffic jams as a result of the population growth, and increase in traffic, but it is the Commission's mission to fix these problems moving forward. He expressed the city of Corona cannot fix this by themselves; the Commission needs to help. Commissioner Jeffries stated the Commission is bringing in $1.3 million per month in surplus toll revenues and suggested if it not being pledged for debt reduction or maintenance and repair, and it is true surplus the Commission should find a way to pledge that towards fixing those additional corridor improvements that are necessary along the SR-91. Commissioner Chuck Washington suggested a slightly different prospective having gone to New York with Commission staff to meet with the rating agencies. He explained as Anne Mayer mentioned there is debt service to be paid and one of the things he had learned as a part of the rating agencies meetings was that for example the comment made about the excess revenue that is coming in is the Commission's initial estimates and projections were very conservative by design. Because of that, the Commission received 60 percent credit for a very conservative projection. He explained going forward the revenue would exceed what the Commission projected since the Commission was conservative and that made the Commission reduce the amount based on what was needed to borrow to get the project done as it was $1.4 billion. He discussed how the Commission's bonds are not rated and he learned that is all that matters is the Commission's bonds be investment grade. Commissioner Washington explained the Commission put as much funding needed into the deal to keep them at an investment grade or above and as a result free up as much funding as possible for all of the Commission projects that are ongoing. He discussed moving forward about how to pay off the TIFIA Loan to pay down that debt service. Commissioner Washington stated that money is going to have to be spent towards paying debt service now, establishing a reserve fund, and whatever the Commission is contributing to pay down debt for the TIFIA Loan. He expressed the Commission is here to solve problems but the takeaway should be the Commission staff is extremely qualified, well versed, and they were highly complimented in New York. Commissioner Brian Berkson explained the end goal is to get the traffic flowing again and the only way he can suggest to do this is that auxiliary lane it is necessary. He expressed there are sticking points at Green River Road and traffic coming on at SR-71, and the traffic tends to clear up when the vehicles approach the SR-241 toll road and from there until you reach Orange County the traffic is flowing until about a mile before the SR-55. He stated understanding the issue with safety for turning off the meter but if that meter is eliminated, he suggests there would be a problem as well since there is already a congested freeway and now you are adding an entire lane of traffic merging into the existing five lanes. Commissioner Berkson expressed that sixth lane will be key to that widening, which will allow that traffic to flow. He discussed when OCTA added a Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 16 westbound lane about 10 years ago traffic congestion changed dramatically for the better and he expects the same exact scenario for the Commission if that auxiliary lane is added. He supports staff's recommendation and hopes to get modified Option 4 in place as soon as possible moving forward. Commissioner Bob Magee expressed appreciation for the strength of the community involvement that brought these issues forward. He explained the leadership on this Commission listened and directed staff to find real solutions and what the Commissioners are looking at is a comprehensive series of recommendations that are not the norm. He expressed this is not the normal way the Commission does business and staff is stretching themselves to respond to the community and to the leadership on this dais to make some very bold changes. Commissioner Magee stated these options could be phased in as Options 1 and 3 get results right away, and Option 4 will be considered this fall. He expressed appreciation to Mr. Bulinski for his willingness to evaluate a trial run for the disconnect or the timing of the ramp meter at Green River Road. He requested this be a part of the motion for the trial to be undertaken between now and the fall; and that the Commission be able to consider the results of the trial as part of the recommendation when Option 4 comes back to the Commission. Commissioner Steven Hernandez concurred with Commissioner Washington's comments and stated the Commission is here to resolve problems; however, the Commission does not want to create another one with respect to the fiduciary responsibilities as an agency. Commissioner Hernandez inquired in the event the Commission is underperforming in meeting the revenue projections how is the gap filled if it were to ever occur and what is the projection with respect to paying off the debt. Anne Mayer explained the current projections are that the Commission will very solidly pay off its debt. She stated obviously the closer to current day we are the more accurate the projections will be, but the Commission's projects are the debt will be paid off. There are advance prepayment requirements if there is excess revenue and the Commission has to share some of that excess revenue with the TIFIA Office to prepay the loan. She stated the Commission is currently in a good position however, this debt will take several decades to pay off. Anne Mayer explained one of the other reasons for the recommendation related to the updated traffic and revenue study is that there are current day conditions. Conditions have changed since the last round was done in 2012 and it needs to be updated, which will come back to the Commission in the fall with updated traffic and revenue projections including the financial models. She explained as Commissioner Washington mentioned in order to obtain these loans staff had to take very significant haircuts in the Commission's projections considering a very negative revenue situation so the Commission is in pretty good shape. However, the Commission needs to have the data show that and that is what the traffic and revenue study is for. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 17 In response to Commissioner Hernandez's inquiry in the event the Commission is underperforming what occurs, Anne Mayer replied the debt structure requires the Commission to pay the debt, it requires to have operations and maintenance, and there is a whole series of reserves that has to be put in place. She discussed the requirements for the reserves and how the Commission will be able to draw on those reserves. Michael Blomquist explained for example one of the reserves is a TIFIA Loan and it is a $20 million reserve specifically set up to pay for TIFIA Loan payments should revenue not meet expectations. Commissioner Spiegel seconded Commissioner Magee's motion. Chair Reed inquired with staff if there is any issue with the Commission agreeing with the recommendation for the trial on the ramp meters. Anne Mayer replied that decision is up to the Commissioners. John Bulinski expressed he would be disappointed if the trial was not included in the motion. M/S/C (Magee/Spiegel) to: 1) Authorize staff to implement the State Route 91 Corridor Operations Project (91 COP) to include the following improvements: a. All project development activities needed to complete environmental approvals, final design, and construction of: i. Interstate 15 northbound 91 Express Lanes Ingress Improvement Option No. 1 (1-15 NB EL Option 1); and ii. SR-91 westbound General Purpose Lane Improvement Option No. 3 (91 WB GP Option 3); b. All project development activities needed to complete environmental approvals and final design of SR-91 westbound General Purpose Lane Improvement modified Option No. 4 (91 WB GP Option 4); 2) Direct staff to return in Fall 2018 with a recommendation regarding the construction of 91 WB GP Option 4; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or her designee, to negotiate and execute: a. Contract amendments or change orders, as applicable, to the following agreements as it is in the public interest and best interest of the Commission to conduct a non-competitive procurement: Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 18 i. Agreement No. 09-31-081-00 with the Parsons Transportation Group (Parsons), as the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project's (91 Project) project and construction manager (PCM), for project development services to implement the 91 COP for an amount as necessary to complete the work currently estimated at $3,192,000; ii. Agreement No. 17-31-079-00 with the Bechtel Corporation (Bechtel), as the Commission's capital project delivery staff augmentation, for project development services to implement the 91 COP for an amount as necessary to complete the work currently estimated at $300,000; and iii. Agreement No. 16-31-057-00 with Skanska-Ames, a Joint Venture (Skanska-Ames), as the existing 1-15 Express Lane Project (1-15 ELP) design -build contractor, to construct: a. 1-15 NB EL Option 1 for an amount as necessary to complete the work currently estimated at $192,000; and b. 91 WB GP Option 3 for an amount as necessary to complete the work currently estimated at $286,000; a. New contract(s) should the Executive Director determine, on behalf of the Commission, and as an alternative to 3(a)(iii) above, it is in the public interest and best interest of the Commission to advertise one or more new procurement(s) to construct: i. 1-15 NB EL Option 1 for an amount as necessary to complete the work currently estimated at $160,000; and ii. 91 WB GP Option 3 for an amount as necessary to complete the work currently estimated at $238,000; 4) Approve Agreement No. 10-31-099-08, Amendment No. 8 to Agreement No. 10-31-099-00, with Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) for an update to the 2012 91 Express Lanes Investment Grade Traffic and Revenue Study for an amount as necessary to complete the work currently estimated at $500,000 as it is in the public interest and best interest of the Commission to conduct a non-competitive procurement; 5) Authorize the expenditure of 91 Express Lanes toll revenue designated as surplus in accordance with the 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds Indenture to fund all 91 COP and 91 Express Lanes traffic and revenue study expenses approved as part of this item for an amount as necessary to complete the work under the contracts described herein, as the same may be further modified or amended by the Executive Director in the best interest of the Commission and without further Committee action, currently estimated at $4,470,000; Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 19 6) Approve adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2017/18 budget to increase project development costs for the 91 COP and professional costs related to the 91 Express Lanes Investment Grade Traffic and Revenue Study update and corresponding transfers of surplus toll revenues from the RCTC 91 Express Lanes Enterprise Fund to the 2009 Measure A Western County Highway Fund for an amount as necessary to complete the work currently estimated at $1 million; 7) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute all necessary agency agreements or amendments to existing agency agreements for the implementation of the 91 COP including cooperative and funding agreements with Ca!trans, Orange County Transportation Authority, California Highway Patrol, and other agencies, as deemed necessary; and 8) Approve for the trial to be undertaken between now and the fall; and that the Commission consider the results of the trial as part of the recommendation when Option 4 comes back to the Commission. No: Pettis 12. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION 8C. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Commissioner White explained he pulled this agenda item as he cannot support AB 3027 as it was written in the notes it would negatively impact individuals and small business owners financial ability to pursue litigation. He pulled the agenda item so he can vote against this item. MSC (Kelly/Baca) to: 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; and 2) Adopt the following bill positions: a) AB 3027 (Chavez) — Support. No: Hyatt, Spiegel, and White At this time, Commissioners Hernandez and Perez left the meeting. 13. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 13A. Commissioner Neil Winter announced it is the 2' year the city of Menifee has been recognized by Walgreens and the Red Nose Funding Foundation and there will be an event held at Murrieta and Newport in Menifee on May 12. Riverside County Transportation Commission Minutes May 9, 2018 Page 20 13B. Commissioner Spiegel expressed appreciation to Commission staff for their continued efforts for working on this with the city of Corona, the Corona residents, and the monthly reports as it is truly appreciated from these unintended consequences that seriously affect the Corona residents. She wished all mothers a Happy Mother's Day. 14. CLOSED SESSION 14A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Subdivision (d)(2) of Government Code Section 54956.9 Potential Number of Case(s): 1 14B. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director or Designee Property Owner(s): See below Item APN(s) Buyers 1 102-092-022, (portion), 102-092-023, 102-101-001, 102-101-002 and 102-101-033 BB and AB Corona, LLC 14C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) Case No. RIC 1505449 and 17-56080 There were no announcements from the Closed Session Items. 14. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, Chair Reed adjourned the meeting at 11:37 a.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, June 13, 2018, Board Chambers, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. Respectfully submitted, Lisa Mobley Clerk of the Board AGENDA ITEM 6 PUBLIC HEARING RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michele Cisneros, Deputy Director of Finance Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2018/19 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive input on the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2018/19; 2) Close the public hearing on the proposed budget for FY 2018/19; 3) Approve the salary schedule effective July 5, 2018, located in Appendix B of the proposed budget; 4) Authorize the expenditure of 91 Express Lanes toll revenues designated as surplus in accordance with the 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds Indenture to fund a $20 million Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) Loan Reserve; 5) Adopt Resolution No. 18-004 "Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of Riverside County Transportation Commission to Increase Employer Contribution Towards Monthly Health Premiums"to increase the health care premium contribution up to a maximum of $750 per month to each employee or non -vested retiree beginning September 1, 2018, as approved by the Executive Committee on April 11, 2018; and 6) Adopt the proposed Budget for FY 2018/19. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The annual fiscal budget is the result of staff determining the operating and capital needs for FY 2018/19 and identifying the resources to fund those needs. The policy goals and objectives approved by the Commission on March 14 were the basis of this budget. The long-term policy goals that support the Commission's objectives considered during the preparation of the budget relate to promoting quality of life; achieving operational excellence; connecting the economy; being a responsible partner; and maintaining fiscal accountability. Staff presented the proposed budget to the Commission on May 9. Staff determined that no additional changes were necessary to the proposed budget subsequent to that presentation. A public hearing to allow for public comment on the proposed budget is required prior to the adoption of the proposed budget, including proposed salary schedule. The public hearing was Agenda Item 6 opened at its May 9 Commission meeting. After the public hearing is closed on June 13, adoption of the proposed budget for FY 2018/19 will follow. In accordance with the Commission's fiscal policies, the budget must be adopted no later than June 15 of each year. The proposed budget for FY 2018/19 is attached. This document contains the executive summary, as revised, that was presented at the May 9 Commission meeting; the Appropriations Limit; a summary of the budget process; fund budgets; details of program revenues and other sources; debt; department budgets; community profile; and appendices including a glossary of acronyms, salary schedule effective July 5, 2018, funding definitions, and program/general terms. Included in the FY 2018/19 budget is a prior authorization to use 91 Express Lanes surplus to fund all 91 corridor operation projects and 91 Express Lanes traffic and revenue study expenses up to $6 million. The FY 2018/19 budget also includes the funding of a $20 million TIFIA Loan Reserve on June 30, 2019, as required by the 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds Indenture, including the TIFIA Loan Agreement as a supplemental indenture. Staff anticipates that approximately 50 percent of the TIFIA Loan Reserve will be funded with the estimated proceeds from the sales of 91 Project surplus properties received during FY 2018/19. Staff recommends that 91 Express Lanes toll revenues designated as surplus, in accordance with the 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds Indenture, fund the balance of the TIFIA Loan Reserve requirement. As approved by the Executive Committee on April 11, 2018, staff included in the FY 2018/19 budget an increase of approximately $90,000 toward the Commission's contribution for health care premiums for each employee or non -vested retiree up to a maximum of $750 per month beginning September 1, 2018. The Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act requires adoption of a new resolution. Staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 18-004 "Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of Riverside County Transportation Commission to Increase Employer Contribution Toward Monthly Health Premiums". A summary of the proposed budget for FY 2018/19 is as follows: Agenda Item 6 Revenues and other financing sources: Sales taxes -Measure A and Local Transportation Funds Reimbursements (federal, state, and other) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Funds, including reimbursements State Transit Assistance Tolls, penalties, and fees Other revenues Interest on investments Debt proceeds Transfers in Total revenues and other financing sources Expenditures and other financing uses: Personnel salaries and fringe benefits Professional services Support services Projects and operations Capital outlay Debt service (principal and interest) Transfers out Total expenditures and other financing uses Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over (under) expenditures and other financing uses Beginning fund balance (projected) Ending fund balance (projected) FY 2018/19 Budget $ 281,000,000 248,586,000 22,922,200 23,203,600 36,940,500 539,000 3,408,000 106,081,000 181,899,300 904,579,600 10,354,700 19,581,200 11,276,900 757,414,800 6,026,200 96,675,600 181,899,300 1,083,228,700 (178,649,100) 789,451,200 $ 610,802,100 Attachments: 1) RCTC Resolution No. 18-004 2) FY 2018/19 Proposed Budget (Posted on the Commission Website) Agenda Item 6 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 18-004 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO INCREASE EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS MONTHLY HEALTH PREMIUMS WHEREAS, Government Code Section 22890 provides that a local agency contracting under the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) shall fix the amount of the employer's contribution at an amount not less than required under Section 22892 of the Act; and, WHEREAS, the employer's contribution towards health premiums for each employee or non -vested retiree has remained at an amount up to a maximum of $600.00 per month since March 2005; and, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Commissioners of the Riverside County Transportation Commission hereby elects to pay each employee or non -vested retiree up to a maximum of $750.00 per month towards health premiums, beginning September 1, 2018 (see attachment). APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 2018. Dana W. Reed, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Lisa Mobley, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 4 RESOLUTION NO. 18-004 FIXING THE EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION AT AN EQUAL AMOUNT FOR EMPLOYEES AND ANNUITANTS UNDER THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT WHEREAS, (1) Riverside County Transportation Commission is a contracting agency under Government Code Section 22920 and subject to the Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, (2) Government Code Section 22892(a) provides that a contracting agency subject to Act shall fix the amount of the employer contribution by resolution; and WHEREAS, (3) Government Code Section 22892(b) provides that the employer contribution shall be an equal amount for both employees and annuitants, but may not be less than the amount prescribed by Section 22892(b) of the Act; and RESOLVED, (a) That the employer contribution for each employee or annuitant shall be the amount necessary to pay the full cost of his/her enrollment, including the enrollment of family members, in a health benefits plan up to a maximum of $750.00 per month, plus administrative fees and Contingency Reserve Fund assessments; and be it further RESOLVED, (b) Riverside County Transportation Commission has fully complied with any and all applicable provisions of Government Code Section 7507 in electing the benefits set forth above; and be it further RESOLVED, (c) That the participation of the employees and annuitants of Riverside County Transportation Commission shall be subject to determination of its status as an "agency or instrumentality of the state or political subdivision of a State" that is eligible to participate in a governmental plan within the meaning of Section 414(d) of the Internal Revenue Code, upon publication of final Regulations pursuant to such Section. If it is determined that Riverside County Transportation Commission would not qualify as an agency or instrumentality of the state or political subdivision of a State under such final Regulations, CaIPERS may be obligated, and reserves the right to terminate the health coverage of all participants of the employer. RESOLVED, (d) That the executive body appoint and direct, and it does hereby appoint and direct, Lisa Mobley, Clerk of the Board, to file with the Board a verified copy of this resolution, and to perform on behalf of Riverside County Transportation Commission all functions required of it under the Act. RESOLVED, (e) That coverage under the Act be effective on September 1, 2018. Adopted at a Commission meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission at Riverside, California, this 13th day of June, 2018. Signed: Dana W. Reed, Chair Attest: Lisa Mobley, Clerk of the Board 5 INSTRUCTIONS This resolution form is the approved form designated by the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CaIPERS). It should be used by a contracting agency subject to Public Employees' Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA) when the agency desires to change the monthly employer health contribution for employees and annuitants in accordance with Government Code Section 22892. The resolution is effective on the first day of the second month following the month in which the resolution is filed (date stamped as received by CaIPERS; See address below). WHEREAS, (1) should be completed with full name of the contracting agency. RESOLVED, (a) should be completed to specify the amount of the employer contribution toward the cost of enrollment for active employees and annuitants. The amount specified must be an amount equal to or greater than that prescribed by Section 22892(b). Commencing January 1, 2009, the employer contribution shall be adjusted annually by the Board to reflect any change in the medical component of the Consumer Price Index, and shall be rounded to the nearest dollar. RESOLVED, (b) should be completed with full name of the contracting agency. RESOLVED, (c) should be completed with full name of the contracting agency. RESOLVED, (d) requests the position title of the individual who handles the PEMHCA resolution for the contracting agency. RESOLVED, (d) should be completed with full name of the contracting agency. Because resolutions serve as a legally binding document, we require the original resolution, certified copy with original signatures, or a copy of the resolution with the agency's raised seal. For resolution processing, deliver to the following: Overnight Mail Service California Public Employees' Retirement System Health Resolution & Compliance Services, HAMD 400 Q Street Sacramento, CA 95811 Regular Mail California Public Employees' Retirement System Health Resolution & Compliance Services, HAMD PO BOX 942714 Sacramento, CA 94229-2714 The certification shown following the resolution is to be completed by those individuals authorized to sign for the contracting agency in legal actions and is to include the name of the executive body; i.e. Board of Directors, Board of Trustees, etc., the location and the date of signing. 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 June 13, 2018 Honorable Commissioners Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside, California FY 2018/ 19 Budget Introduction RCTC: Connecting Your Life Thank you forreviewing the Fiscal Year (FY) 2018/19 budget forthe Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission or RCTC). This document provides an opportunity to evaluate the financial backbone of an innovative and active public transportation agency that connectsthe lives of Riverside County (County) residents every day. Most notably, RCTC opened the Riverside County portion of the 91 ExpressLanesin March 2017 and hasseen a yearof successful operations and usage of the facility that hasfarsurpanfrd expectations. The upcoming fiscal year continues a concerted effort of investment and construction in the County'stransportation infrastructure with construction intensifying on the Interstate (I) 15 Express Lanes project and new projects, such asthe State Route (SR) 60 truck climbing lanes, Mid County Parkway, and the I-215/Placentia interchange on the near -term horizon. People Working —Building a Better Future The Commission and its project partners at the California Department of Transportation, local jurisdictions, and transit agenciesare investing in transportation using a variety of local, state, and federal sources to build projects, plan and design new improvements, and get people working and contributing to the local economy. During FY2018/19, the Commission will invest $551 million in capital projectsthat include highway, regional arterial, local streets and roads, and rail projects. The Commission's overall budget will exceed $881 million and includesfunding of transit operations, paymentsto citiesand the County for street and road improvements, and management of smaller programs, such as motorist and commuter assistance. Measure A —The Funding Foundation The Commission'svoter-approved half -cent salestax program servesasthe main funding source for transportation funding in Riverside County. Measure A sales tax revenues are stable with average annual growth of over2.6%in the last decade; they are projected at $187 million for FY 2018/19. Although Measure A revenueshelp to fund majorprojectsincluding the 1-15 Express Lanes project, Measure A also funds local transportation priorities and needs. In FY 2018/19, the Commission will return $56.9 million in funding to local cities and the County for local street and road improvements. The Coachella Valley Association of Governments and the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) administer Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) programs that serve local and regional arterial needs. In the Coachella Valley, arterials are funded through a combination of TUMF, Measure A, and additional local contributions. In Western Riverside County, TUMFdollarsare equally split between WRCOG and the Commission with RCTC'sdollarsallocated to regional arterialsand new highway corridors. Funding transportation projectsand services requiresa combination of funding sources, and the Commission receivesand programsfunding from state and federal sources. Thisincludesthe state of California's (State or California) Transportation Development Act program dollars allocated primarily to the County'smajor public transit providers. Measure A also pays its share by funding transit fare discounts; programsforseniorcitizens, personswith disabilities, and ind ivid ualsof limited means; and operating a commuter assistance program that provides traveler information and ridesharing assistance to employersand commuters. 91 Express LanesSurpassinp Expectations On March 20, 2017, the Commission opened the extension of the 91 Express Lanes, a $1.4 billion project consisting of two tolled expresslanesand the addition of a general purpose lane in each direction of SR91 between the Orange County line and 1-15 in Corona. Usage is more than 50 percent higher than forecasted, and revenues are 160 percent higher than original projections, with more than 1.2 million tripson the facility each month. Strong demand in the corridor and the popularity of the facility will ensure that RCTC meets itsdebt service requirements. The completion of the project also creates new responsibilitiesforthe Commission asa toll facility operator. Thisyear'sbudget reflectsthe new revenuesand expensesgenerated by the 91 Express Lanes. The transition into toll operationsalso servesasa precursor into a much broader role as toll operator, with construction already underway on the 1-15 Express Lanes project. This $471 million effort adds one to two tolled express lanes to an approximately 15-mile section of 1-15 between SR60 and Cajalco Road. The new 15 Express Lanes will travel through the cities of Corona, Eastvale, Norco, and Jurupa Valley and are expected to open in 2020. Additional Projects and Services State Route 60 Truck Climbing Lanes Project Clears Hurdle The Commission hasprevailed in court on multiple occasionsdefending against legal challenges to the environmental document forthe State Route 60 Truck Lanesproject. Settlement discussions are expected to resolve the legal processto enable the Commission to start construction in 2019. The much -needed eastbound truck -climbing lane and westbound truck -descending lane will not increase capacity, but will improve overall safety along a heavily used highway corridor through the Badlandsarea of Riverside County. Freeway Service Patrol and Metrolink ServicesAchieve Key Milestone June 14, 2018 marks the 25th Anniversary of Metrolink paqrrnger rail service in Riverside County, and June 28,2018isthe 25th Anniversary of the Freeway Service Patrol. Both programsare popular, serve highly traveled corridors, and exemplify direct services to the public funded by the Commission. While RCTC primarily functions as a project -driven organization, the Commission's significant funding toward public transit and motorist servicesand operation of toll facility further increase itsdirect interaction with the public. Planning for an Uncertain and Exciting Future State Creates Rverside County Transportation Efficiency Corridor to 43eed Rverside County Projects The State Legislature and Governor Brown approved Senate Bill (SB) 1, a comprehensive transportation funding bill that increases the gas tax and agiv-irrs other fees to fund needed improvements throughout California. The added funding focuses primarily on maintenance priorities but also leverageslocal funding sources, such asthe Commission's Measure A program, to fund additional projects. In and of itself, the increase in funding is welcome news for the Commission; however, another added benefit in related legislation (S3 132) placed a special priority and appropriated $427 million in state funding forfive projectsin northwestern Riverside County. The State'saction ensures the funding needed to move forward on these five projects — an express lanes connector between the 91 Express Lanes and the future 1-15 Express Lanes north of SR-91, railroad grade separations at Jurupa Road in Jurupa Valley and McKinley Street in Corona, an expanded interchange at 1-15and Limonite Avenue in Eastvale, and the replacement of the HamnerAvenue bridge overthe Santa Ana River in Norco. The Commission will play an active role in the delivery of the projects, with a special emphasison the construction of the expresslanesconnectorthat will benefit both the existing 91 Express Lanes and the future 1-15 Express Lanes. the SB 132 projectsare especially important since California'srecent action to increase the state fuel tax and vehicle license fees likely will face a repeal effort on the November 2018 ballot. The approval of SB 1 helped ensure a more reliable flow of state funding fora variety of transportation programsand projects; it now facesuncertainty that will not be resolved until afterthe November 2018 General Election. Funding is but one piece of determining the future of transportation. In order to help guide the Commission through the challenges of population growth, changing demographics, economic needs, and technological change, RCM has launched an effort to develop a long-range transportation plan for Riverside County. Overall, there are a number of long-range projects envisioned forthe County including the Mid County Parkway, realignment of SR79, pamcngerrail service to the Coachella Valley, a variety of active transportation projects, and a new expressway along Ethanac Road. In addition to these projects, local streetsand roadsand new interchanges are equally important; a long-range plan will be useful in guiding the overall direction of transportation investment and development in the County. A Commitment to Fiverside County Ensuring local funding for transportation will require ongoing outreach to the public and transparent oversight and management that ensures public confidence in the Commission's fiduciary, oversight, and visionary roles. This budget document is intended to demonstrate the Commission'scommitment to the public aswell asdocumenting the Commission'sdedication to sound budget practices. This budget document is one of many ways the Commission works to ensure public accountability and full transparency of itsactions. The Commission has also expanded its commitment in communicating with the public and is closely monitoring itspublic engagement activities, which progresswill be reported on a quarterly basis. We welcome public input and participation and invite you to visit our website at www.rctc.org or to follow uson Facebook, Twitter and Instagram at the RCTC. GFOA Distinguished Budget Award The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to the Commission foritsannual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2017. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, an operations guide, a financial plan, and a communicationsdevice. The award isvalid fora period of one year only. The Commission believesthis budget continues to conform to program requirements, and it will be submitted to GFOA to determine the Commission'seligibility foranother award. Acknowledgments the preparation of this budget has been a collaborative effort of the Commission's staff. the budget reflectsthe Commission'sdesire to communicate the componentsof the budget in terms that are easily understandable and supportable forthe general public. Staff acknowledgesand appreciates the guidance and leadership of the Board of Commissioners and the sense of renewal and commitment it hasand continuesto inspire. 9gnature on file 9gnature on file Anne Mayer, Executive Director lheresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMISSION INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Policy Goalsand Objectives Policy Matrix Budget Overview Commission Personnel Department Initiatives Fund Balances Budget Comparative Operating and Capital Budget Budget by Governmental Fund Type Highway, Regional Arterial, and Rail Programs GANN APPROPRIATIONSLIMIT Section 1: GUIDING POLICIES Commission Policy Goalsand Objectives Financial and Administration Policies Policy Matrix Section 1: FiNANCIALOVERVIEW Fiscal Accountability Policies Functional Management Functional Organization Chart Budget Process Staff Organization Chart Section 2: FUND BUDG EIS Budgetary Basisand FundsStructure General Fund Special Revenue Funds Capital Projects Funds Debt Service Funds Enterprise Fund Section 3: REVENUESAND OTHER SO URC ES Revenuesand Other Sources Program Revenuesand Other Sources Section 4: COMMISSION DEBT Debt Debt Capacity Analysis Sales Tax Bonds: Aggregate Debt Service Schedule Outstanding Debt and Debt Service Requirements Program and Geographic Debt Toll Revenue Bonds: Debt Service Schedules Outstanding Legal Debt Margin Narrative discussion of the history of the Commission and list of principal officers Narrative overview of the operational and financial factorsconsidered Narrative description of policy goalsand objectives Linkage of policy goalsand departmental goalsand objectives Summarized narrative overview, charts, and tablesof sourcesand uses Personnel expendituresand full-time equivalents Major initiativesand summarized usesby department Projected fund balancesbygovernmental fund type and program Schedule of budget by summarized line item Schedule of budget classified by operating and capital purposes Schedule of budget by governmental fund type Listing of budgeted capital project expendituresby program Narrative discussion of the a ppropriationslimit Narrative description of policy goalsand objectives Description of financial policies Linkage of policy goalsand departmental goalsand objectives Description of financial policies Narrative description of Commission functions Organization chart by Commission functions Narrative description ofvariousbudget stages Organization chart of budgeted staff Narrative description of budgetary basis and funds structure Overview; narrative and chartsof sourcesand uses Overview; narrative and chartsof sourcesand uses by Measure A and non -Measure A special revenue funds Overview; narrative and chartsof sourcesand uses Overview; narrative and chartsof sourcesand uses Overview; narrative and chartsof sourcesand uses Narrative description ofvariousrevenuesand other sources; schedule of funding sourcesby department/program; definitionsand background Narrativesof revenuesby program; revenue trends Narrative discussion of debt programs Chartsand accompanying narrative demonstrating debt capacity Schedule of debt maturitiesby yearforsalestax bonds Description of outstanding debt and related debt service requirements Chartsof debt service by program and geographic area Description of outstanding debt and related debt service requirements Schedule of calculation of legal debt margin Section 5: DEPARTME NTBUDGEIS Budget Comparison by Department 5.1: MANAGEMENTSERVICES Executive Management Administration Legislative Affairsand Communications Finance 5.2: REGIONAL PROGRAMS Planning and Programming Rail Public and Specialized Transit Commuter Assistance Motorist Assistance 5.3: CAPITAL PROJECTS Capital Project Development and Delivery Location of Capital Projects Capital Projects Summary Local Rreetsand Roadsaammary 5.4: TOLLOPERATIONS Riverside 91 Express Lanes Section 6: COMMUNITY PROFILE Riverside County Demographics Statistical Information Commission Facts Section 7: APPENDICES A —Glossary of Acronyms B—Glossary of Funding Definitions C—Glossary of Program Terms D—Glossary of General Terms E—Salary Schedule Schedule of revenues, expenditures, and otherfinancing sources(uses) by department Goalsand objectives, key assumptionsand budgeted uses Goalsand objectives, key assumptionsand budgeted uses Goalsand objectives, key assumptionsand budgeted uses Goalsand objectives, key assumptionsand budgeted uses Goalsand objectives, key assumptionsand budgeted uses Goalsand objectives, key assumptionsand budgeted uses Goalsand objectives, key assumptionsand budgeted uses Goalsand objectives, key assumptionsand budgeted uses Goalsand objectives, key assumptionsand budgeted uses Goalsand objectives, key assumptionsand budgeted uses Local map of majorcapital projectsfor current year Narrative description of each capital project Schedule of local streetsand roadsdisbursementsby local agency Goalsand objectives, key assumptionsand budgeted uses Narrative discussion of Riverside County'scommunity profile Chartsofvariousdemographic data Chartsand tablesof variousstatistical information Narrative overview of the Commission'sprogramsand services Explanation of commonly used abbreviations Narrative description ofvariousfunding sources Description of Commission programsand related terms Commonly used termsin govemmental accounting and finance Schedule ofsalariesin accordance with state law Commission Introduction State of California (State) law created the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission orRCTC) in 1976to oversee the funding and coordination of all public transportation serviceswithin Riverside County (County). The Commission'smission isto assume a leadership role in improving mobility in the County. The governing body consistsof all five membersof the County Board of Supervisors, one elected official from each of the County's28 cities, and one non -voting member appointed by the Governor of California. The Commission is responsible for setting policies, establishing priorities, and coordinating activities among the County's various transit operators and other agencies. The Commission also programs and/or reviews the allocation of federal, state, and local funds for highway, transit, rail, non -motorized travel (bicycle and pedestrian), and othertransportation activities. The Commission islegally responsible for allocating Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds, the major source of funds for transit in the County. The TDA provides two sources of funding: the Local Transportation Fund (OF), derived from a one-quarterof one -cent state salestax, and State Transit Assistance (STA), derived from the statewide salestax on diesel fuel. The Commission serves asthe tax authority and implementation agency for the voter approved Measure A Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The County's electorate originally approved Measure A in 1988 to impose a one-half of one cent transaction and use tax (salestax) to fund specific programsthat commenced in July 1989 (1989 Measure A). The 1989 Measure A was approved for 20 years and expired on June 30, 2009. On November 5, 2002, the voters of Riverside County approved the renewal of Measure A beginning in July 2009 through June 2039 (2009 Measure A). Additionally, the Commission provides motorist aid services designed to expedite traffic flow. These services include the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE), a program that providescall box service for motorists; the Freeway Service Patrol (FSP), a roving tow truck service to assist motorists with disabled vehicles on the main highways of the County during peak rush hour traffic periods; and 1E511, a traveler information system. These services are provided at no charge to motoristsand are funded through a $1 surcharge on vehicle registrations. The Commission has been designated as the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for the County. As the CMA, the Commission coordinates with local jurisdictions in the establishment of congestion mitigation proceduresforthe County'sroadway system. In March 2017the Commission commenced toll operationson the RCTD 91 ExpressLanesfollowing the substantial completion of the State Route (SR) 91 corridor improvement project (91 Project). Construction started on a second managed lanes project, the 1-15 Express Lanes project, in FY 2017/18with completion expected in 2020. The 15/91 Express Lanesconnector, a tolled connector between the existing 91 Express Lanes and the future 1-15 Express Lanes to the north of SR-91, received an allocation of state fundsin FY2016/17. The Commission anticipatescompletion of this project by 2022. Riverside County Transportation Commission List of Principal Officials Board of Commissioners Name Title Agency Kevin Jeffries Member County of Riverside, District 1 John F. Tavaglione Member County of Riverside, District 2 Chuck Washington Vice Chair (Commission) County of Riverside, District 3 V. Manuel Perez Member County of Riverside, District 4 Marion Ashley Member County of Riverside, District 5 Deborah Franklin Member City of Banning tJoyd White Member City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck Member City of Blythe Jim Hyatt Member City of Calimesa Randall Bonner Member City of Canyon Lake Greg Pettis Member City of Cathedral City Steven Hernandez Member City of Coachella Karen Spiegel Member City of Corona Scott Matas Member City of Desert Hot Springs Adam Rush Chair (Western Riverside County Programsand City of Eastvale Projects Committee) Linda Krupa Vice Chair (Budget and Implementation City of Hemet Committee) Dana Reed Chair (Commission) City of Indian Wells Michael Wilson Member City of Indio Brian Berkson Vice Chair (Western Riverside County City of Jurupa Valley Programsand Projects Committee) Kathleen Fitzpatrick Member City of La Quinta Bob Magee Member City of Lake Elsinore To Be Appointed Member City of Menifee Victoria Baca Member City of Moreno Valley Rick Gibbs Member City of Murrieta Berwin Hanna Member City of Norco Jan Harnik Member City of Palm Desert Lisa Middleton Member City of Palm Springs Michael M. Vargas Member City of Perris Ted Weill Member City of Rancho Mirage Rusty Bailey Chair (Budget and Implementation City of Riverside Committee) Andrew Kotyuk Member City of San Jacinto Michael S. Naggar Member City of Temecula Ben Benoit 2nd Vice Chair (Commission) City of Wildomar John Bulinski Interim Governor's Appointee Caltrans, District 8 Management Staff Anne Mayer, Executive Director John aandiford, Deputy Executive Director Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director Marlin Feenstra, Project Delivery Director Aaron Hake, External Affa irs Director Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director lheresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Executive Summary Introduction The budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018/19 is presented to the Board of Commissioners (Board) and the citizens of Riverside County. The budget outlines the projects the Commission plans to undertake during the year and appropriates expenditures to accomplish these tasks. The budget also shows the funding sources and fund balances for these projects. This document serves as the Commission's monetary guideline for the fiscal year. To provide the reader better understanding of the projects, staff has included descriptive information regarding each department and major projects. The discussion in each department includes a review of accomplishments, major initiatives, and key assumptions. Policy Goa Isand Objectives As approved at its March 9, 2018 meeting, the Commission is driven by four core goals and underlying objectivesforthe people of Riverside County and the transportation system upon which they rely: QUALITY OF UFE RC1C is focused on improving life for the people of Riverside County and empowering them to live life at their pace. Choice Environmental Stewardship Access Goods Movement RCTC empowers the residents of Riverside County to choose how to get safely to where they are going. RCTC protectsand preservesthe County'senvironment for our residents. RCTC provides access, equity, and choice in transportation; RCTC is a mobility partner. RCTC projects are the connection to employment, schools, community institutions, parks, medical facilitiesand shopping in the community. ROTC facilitates the funding and delivery of projects that mitigate the impact of increased goods movement flow through Riverside County. O PERAIIO NAL EXC ELLEN C E RCM is responsible and conservative steward oftax. a erdolla State of Good Repair Promises Fulfilled Innovation Information RCTC invests in road safety and maintenance in its residents' neighborhoods. Projects are completed on -time, on -budget; RCTC delivers on its promises asa steward of Riverside County residents' investment. Program and project delivery innovationsd rive results, savings, and greater economic opportunitiesfor Riverside County residents. RCTC operationsare transparent; customersget fast, timely, quality service. CONNECTING 1HEECONOMY RCTC is driverofeconomic •rowth in Riverside Coun . Workforce Mobility Population Growth Economic Impact RCTC improvesthe economy by creating a robust workforce to workplace system; RCTC helps movesthe economy of Riverside County. Since 1976, RCTC has been responsible for connecting our County's economy as the County'spopulation has quadrupled from 550,000 to 2.3 million today. RCTC has invested $2.8 billion in the County'seconomy thanksto Measure A, which hasa multiplier impact in termsofjobsand economic opportunity throughout Riverside County. RESPONSIBLE PA RTN ER RCTC •artnerswith local, regional, and state govemmentsto deliver road and transit proje Streets and Roads Tra nsit Active Transportation Facilities IC invests in local priorities for maintaining streets and roads and fixing potholes. RCTC is a partner with transit operators to provide residents mobility choices, flexibility, intercity and intercounty connectivity, and access. RCTC is a partner with agencies within the County to promote active transportation alternatives, including the building of regional trails and bicycle and pedestrian facilities in accordance with local general master and active transportation plans. RCTC isa steward of state and federal grantsto improve our communities. RCTC invests Measure A dollars into projects and programs that benefit local communitiesthroughout the County. Staff used these core goalsand objectivesto prepare this budget and develop the following short- term objectivesto guide furtherthe development of the FY2018/19 budget. Capital Project Development and Delivery • Continue design and construction of the Interstate (I) 15 Express Lanesand development of the 71/91 interchange improvements, State Route(SR) 60 truck climbing lanes, Mid County Parkway, and SR79 realignment projects included in the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. • Aggressively pursue commencement of development of the 1-15 Express Lanes —Southern Extension project. • Enhance corridor mobility and traveler choice with the operation of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes, construction of the 1-15 Express Lanes, and development of the next generation of toll feasible projects. • Collaborate with local jurisdictions to implement the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (IUMF) regional arterial program projects and facilitate the delivery of eligible arterial improvements in western Riverside County (Western County). • Continue active engagement in state and federal efforts to streamline and modernize the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to improve the Commission'sability to deliver critical projects. Regional Programs • Maintain an active involvement in state and federal legislative matters to ensure that the Commission receives proper consideration fortransportation projectsand funding. • Continue the development of a county -wide transportation plan and the first ten-year update of the 2009 Measure A Expenditure Plan, asrequired by the ordinance. • Subsidize reliable and cost-effective Metrolink commuter rail service to and from Riverside County; Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) isthe operator of Metrolink. • Provide leadership in the planning and development of the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Passcorridor rail service. • Support innovative programs that provide transit assistance in hard to serve rural areas or for riderswith special transit needs. • Promote cost controlsand operating efficiency fortransit operators. • Maintain effective partnerships among commuters, employers, and government to increase the efficiency of our transportation system by encouraging and promoting motorized and non - motorized transportation alternatives. • Provide a motorist aid system that ensuressafety and convenience to freeway motorists. Management Services • Maintain close communication with Commissioners and educate policy makers on all issues of importance to the Commission. • Develop and execute a communicationsand public engagement strategy for the purposesof education, information, and customerservice. • Maintain administrative program delivery costs below the policy threshold of 4%of Measure A revenues; the FY2018/19 Management Servicesbudget is1.65%of Measure A revenues. • Maintain administrative salaries and benefits at less than 1% of Measure A revenues; the FY 2018/19 administrative salaries and benefits is .62%of Measure A revenues. • Maintain prudent cash reservesto provide some level of insulation for unplanned expenditures. • Maintain current strong bond ratingswith rating agencies. • Establish and maintain revenues and reserves generated from toll operations to be available for debt service in accordance with toll supported debt agreements; maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, administration and operations; and capital projectswithin the corridor. Linking Commission Policy Goals and Departmental Goals and Objectives The following matrix (Table 1) illustratesthe linkage of the Commission'score policy goalsdescribed in thissection to the individual departmental goalsand objectivesincluded in Section 5. Table 1 —Relationship between Commission and Departmental Goals Department Quality of Life Operational Excellence Connecting the Econom Responsible Pa rtne r Management Services Executive Management Administration Exte ma I Affairs Finance Regional Programs Plannin• and Pro•rammin• Rail Maintenance and Operations Public and Specialized Transit Commuter Assistance Motorist Assista nc e Capital Project Development an De live Toll Operations Budget Overview X X X X 111 X X X X X � X X Total sources (Table 2) are budgeted at $904,579,600, a decrease of 41%overFY2017/18 projected sourcesand a 43%decrease overthe FY2017/18 budget. Total sourcesare comprised of revenues of $616,599,300, transfers in of $181,899,300, and debt proceeds of $106,081,000. The projected fund balance at June 30, 2018 available for expenditures/expenses (excluding amounts restricted for debt service of $18,719,300, advances receivable of $25,039,500, and 1-15 Express Lanes ramp - up reserve of $16,500,000) is $729,192,400. Accordingly, total funding available for the FY 2018/19 budget totals$1,633,772,000. Table 2 — Sources FY 2017-2019 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Measure A SalesTax $ 175,320,200 $ 181,000,000 $ 181,000,000 $ 187,000,000 $ 6,000,000 3% OFles Tax 88,206,900 91,000,000 91,000,000 94,000,000 3,000,000 3% STA&ilesTax 6,432,600 10,469,000 20,204,800 23,203,600 12,734,600 122% Intergovernmental 32,467,600 101,992,400 121,118,500 248,586,000 146,593,600 144% 1UMFRevenue 19,594,800 22,250,000 22,250,000 22,922,200 672,200 3% Tolls, Penalties, and Fees 10,125,300 16,835,800 42,812,600 36,940,500 20,104,700 119% Other Revenue 6,746,000 2,803,700 574,200 539,000 (2,264,700) -81% Investment Income 4,495,300 3,509,400 7,595,300 3,408,000 (101,400) -3% TransfersIn 188,488,900 313,676,500 298,371,800 181,899,300 (131,777,200) -42% Debt Proceeds 257,912,100 837,782,000 752,488,800 106,081,000 (731,701,000) -87% TOTAL Spumes $ 789,789,700 $ 1,581,318,800 $ 1,537,416,000 $ 904,579,600 $ (676,739,200) -43% Riverside County has specific competitive advantages over nearby coastal counties(LosAngeles, Orange, and San Diego) including housing that is more available and affordable as well as plentiful commercial real estate and land available for development at lower costs. Riverside County'seconomy isbenefitting from employment gainsthat are a function of the County'sability to attract businerncrswith lower commercial rentsand a skilled labor force. Population migration to the Inland Empire (i.e., Riverside and San Bernardino counties) has occurred due to these employment opportunities and a lower cost of living compared to the coastal counties. Improvements in the local labor market and resurgence in home sales has increased economic activity contributing to stable salestax revenue growth asnoted on Chart 1. Chart 1 —Sources: Five -Year Trend $800,000,000 $700,000,000 $600,000,000 $500,000,000 $400,000,000 $300,000,000 $200,000,000 $100,000,000 $0 FY 14/ 15 FY 15/ 16 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY 18/ 19 Measure A Sales Tax �L1FS11esTax m0 STA SalesTax *lUM F .•1*FederaI, Sate, Local Revenues Toll Revenue �Tra nders In Debt Proceeds Sales tax revenues have continued to remain stable during the last five fiscal years. lhe Commission's economic outlook for FY2017/18 continuesto be cautiously optimistic; however, the state and federal budget issues continue to affect funding of the Commission's capital projects and programs. Should Measure A and LlF sales tax revenues fluctuate and the availability of federal and state revenues continue to be uncertain, the timing and scope of the Commission's projectsand programsmay be impacted. Regardless of the future economic conditions, the Commission faces formidable ongoing challenges in termsof providing needed infrastructure enhancementsto support a population and an economy that has outgrown the capacity of its existing infrastructure. Fortunately, the foundation of the regional economy continues to retain many of the fundamental positive attributes that fueled its earlier growth, including lower priced real estate with proximity to coastal communities, a large pool of skilled workers, and increasing wealth and education levels. While the Commission's primary revenues are the Measure A and LTF sales taxes, other revenues and financing sourcesare required to fund the Commission'sprogramsand projectsasillustrated in Chart 2. Chart 2 —Sources: Major Categories Debt Proceeds1 Transfers In Tolls, Penalties, and Fees4% IUMFRevenue 'a Measure ASaIesTax 21% Intergovemmenta127% LlFSales Tax 10% S1A SaIesTax 3% The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA), as statutorily created and authorized successor to the former California State Board of Equalization, recently provided to cities and other agencies its projections that statewide taxable sales over the next fiscal year will increase 3.8%. Continuing its conservative projection practices, the Commission considers short - and long-term salestax p rojections from its consulta nts to estimate salestax revenues. After taking the state of the local economy and recent revenue trends into consideration, staff projects Measure A sales tax revenues of $187,000,000 for FY 2018/19. This is a 3% increase from the FY 2017/18 revised projection of $181,000,000. At midyear the Commission will rea,imss sales tax revenue projectionsbased on the economy and revenue trends. On behalf of the County, the Commission administers the LTFfor public transportation needs, local streets and roads, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The majority of LTFfunding received by the County and available for allocation is distributed to all public transit operators in the County, and the Commission receives allocations for administration, planning, and programming in addition to funding for Western County rail operations included in the commuter rail Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP). The LTFsalestax revenue received from the State is budgeted at $94,000,000, an increase of 3%from the FY2017/18 revised projection of $91,000,000. A statewide sales tax on motor vehicle fuel generates STA funds, which the State Controller allocates by formula to the Commission for allocationsto the County'spublic transit operators. The FY2018/19 STA transit allocation, based on recent State estimates, is$23,203,600. Intergovernmental revenues include reimbursement revenues from federal sources of $59,105,700, state sources of $165,442,400, and local agencies of $24,037,900 for highway and rail capital projects, rail operations and station maintenance, commuter assistance, and motorist assistance programs as well as planning and programming activities. The significant increase of 144% in FY 2018/19 compared to the FY 2017/18 budget is related to increases in state and local reimbursements offset by a decrease in federal reimbursements. Senate Bill (SB) 132 provides state funding for the 15/91 Express Lanes connector and pass -through funding to the County for the 1- 15/Limonite interchange and to the County and city of Corona for grade separation projects. Local reimbursements from the Riverside County Regional Park and Open Space District (District) fund the Santa Ana River Trail projects. Reimbursement revenuesvary from yearto yeardepending on project activitiesand funding levels. Based on an amended Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), the Commission receives 45.7% of TUMF revenues (as updated by the most recent Nexus study). TUMF represents fees accessed on new residential and commercial development in Western County. The Commission projects FY 2018/19 TUMFfeeswill remain flat at $21,000,000 and expects additional TUMF zone reimbursements of $1,922,200 for the Lake Elsinore Railroad Canyon project. FY 2017/18 marked the first complete fiscal year of toll operations for the RCTC 91 Express Lanes following substantial completion of the 91 Project in March 2017. Snce toll revenuessurpanrd 2013 financing actamptions, including the Riverside County 91 Express Lanes Extension Investment Grade Traffic and Revenue Study completed in 2012, the Commission estimates FY 2018/19 toll revenues of $36,940,500 based on current operations. Other revenue of $539,000 includes property management generated from properties acquired in connection with various highway and rail properties. The Commission anticipates 3%decrease in FY 2018/19 investment income compared to the FY 2017/18 budget asthe result of decreasing cash and investments balances. Transfers in of $181,899,300 relate primarily to the transfer of available debt proceeds for highway projects; LTF funding for general administration, planning and programming, rail operations and station maintenance, and grade separation project allocations; approved interfund allocationsfor specific projects and administrative cost allocations; and debt service requirementsfrom highway, regional arterial, and local streets and roads funds. Debt proceeds consist of $106,081,000 in drawdowns from the federal Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan related to the 1-15 ExpressLanesproject. Total uses (Table 3), including transfersout of $181,899,300, are budgeted at $1,083,228,700, a 35% decrease from the prior year budget amount of $1,670,674,300. Program expenditures and transfers out totaling $963,301,400 represent 89% of total budgeted uses in FY 2018/19. Program costsdecreased by 2%from $980,602,200 in FY2017/18 due to projectsidentified below. Table 3 — Uses FY 2017-2019 Capital Highway, Rail, and Regional Arterials Capital Local areetsand Roads Commuter Assistance Debt Service Management cervices Motorist Assistance Planning and Programming Public and Decialized Transit Rail Maintenance and Operations Toll Operations TOTAL Uses FY 16/ 17 FY 17/ 18 FY 17/ 18 Projected Actual Revised Budget $ 463,475,000 $ 695,898,200 51,864,000 55,037,500 2,686,100 5,855,300 138,576,600 666,924,800 16,634,800 23,147,300 5,245,600 5,951,400 2,541,000 13,877,400 104, 585,200 147,653,300 24,298,600 37,232,000 4,431,900 19,097,100 $ 814,338,800 $ 1,670,674,300 FY 18/ 19 Budget $ 536,277,600 $ 620,407,000 55,037,500 56,951,500 4,908,900 6,197,800 660,979,600 96,675,600 21,217,200 23,251,700 5,279,700 10,006,400 6,915,900 20,526,200 129,691,400 188,418,700 29,968,200 37,119,800 13,561,200 23,674,000 $ 1,463,837,200 $ 1,083,228,700 Dollar Change $ (75,491,200) 1,914,000 342,500 (570,249,200) 104,400 4,055,000 6,648,800 40,765,400 (112,200) 4,576,900 $ (587,445,600) Percent Change -11 3% 6% -86 0% 68 48% 28 0% 24 -35 Note: Management ServicesincludesExecutive Management, Administration, External Affairs, and Finance. Capital highway, rail, and regional arterials budgeted uses of $620,407,000 are 11% lower compared to the FY2017/18 budget due to completion of the 91 Project. Local streets and roads expenditures of $56,951,500 reflect an increase of 3%over the FY2017/18 budget and represent the disbursements to local jurisdictions for the construction, repair, and maintenance of local streetsand roads. Commuter assistance budgeted expend itures of $6,197,800 are 6%higher than FY2017/18 budget due to a new vanpool program. Debt service of $96,675,600 decreased 86%because of the refunding of $541,889,900 of sales tax revenue bonds, swap termination payment of $7,526,000, and retirement of $30,000,000 in commercial paper notesin FY2017/18. Management services expenditures remained consistent with the FY 2017/18 budget; these services include information technology equipment upgrades, office space expansion, robust communication and engagement efforts, financial advisory services, and debt service contribution. Motorist assistance expenditures increased 68%or $4,055,000 from the FY 2017/18 budget due to increased FSP services for capital highway projects and additional FSP beats due to increased funding, including 33132 revenues. Planning and programming budgeted expend itures of $20,526,200 reflect a 48%increase from the FY 2017/18 budget due to increased projects and operations activities in connection with LlF disbursements for planning and programming, grade separation and other agency projects, and special studies. Public and specialized transit budgeted expenditures of $188,418,700 are 28% higher than the FY 2017/18 budget due to increased capital expendituresfor public transit. lhe rail maintenance and operation's budgeted expenditures of $37,119,800 remain consistent with the FY2017/18 budget and include commuter rail and station operations as well as planning and development forthe Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Passcorridor rail service. Toll operations expenses are budgeted at $23,674,000 to manage the operations, maintenance, and capital support of the RCTC 91 ExpressLanesand pay interest on toll revenue bonds. Chart 3 isan illustration of total uses included in the FY2018/19 budget by major categories. Chart 3—Uses: Major Categories Rail Maintenance and Operations 4% Public and $iecialized Ta nsit 17% Planning and Programming 2% M oto rist Assista n c 1% Managements ry ice 2% Debt Iry ice 9% Commuter Assistance 1% Capital Local Breetsand Roads 5% Commission Personnel Toll Operations 2% Capital Highway, Rail, and Regional Arterials 57 % The Commission's salaries and benefits total $10,354,700 for FY 2018/19. ibis represents an increase of $800,500 or 8% over the FY 2017/18 budget of $9,554,200 (Chart 4). The increase relates to one additional full-time equivalent (FTE), an increase to the Commission's contribution to employee health benefits, and a 4% pool for merit -based salary increases. The FY 2018/19 budget includes two new capital project managers using one available FTE for a net increase of one RE. The Commission's salary schedule for FY 2018/19 is included in Appendix B and complies with Government Code §20636 "Compensation Earnable" and California Code of Register §570.5, "Requirementsfora Publicly Available PaySchedule." Chart 4—Salariesand Benefits Cost: Ave -Year Comparison $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- FY 14/ 15 FY 15/ 16 FY 16/ 17 FY 17/ 18 FY 18/ 19 The FY2018/19 FTEof 51 positions iscomparable to the FY2017/18 level (Table 4) and reflectsa net 1.0 FTE increase related to the recruitment of two capital project managers. The Commission accomplished significant organization changes, including the addition of toll operations, over the past few years related to various projects requiring substantial attention at many staff levels. Management continues to be firmly committed to the intent of the Commission's enabling legislation requiring a lean organization. The Commission will continue providing staff the tools needed to ensure an efficient and productive work environment. However, small should not be viewed in an absolute context; it isrelative to the required tasksand the demandsto be met. Table 4-Full-Time Equivalents by Department FY 2017-2019 FY16/17 FY 17/ 18 FY 18/ 19 Executive Management 0.6 0.4 Administration 4.7 5.2 Exte m a I Affairs 4.9 3.8 Finance 7.0 7.6 Planning and Programming 4.9 5.2 Rail Maintenance and Operations 4.3 4.5 Public and Specialized Transit 2.6 2.3 Commuter Assistance 1.4 1.4 Motorist Assistance 0.8 1.4 Capital Project Development and Delivery 14.7 14.6 Toll Operations 1.1 3.6 TOTAL 47.0 50.0 0.6 5.6 3.7 8.3 5.3 4.2 2.5 1.6 1.2 15.5 2.5 51.0 lhe Commission provides a comprehensive package of benefits to employees. lhe package includes: health, dental, vision, life insurance, short and long-term disability, workers' compensation, tuition assistance, sick and vacation leave, retirement benefits in the form of participation in the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CaIPERS), postretirement health care, deferred compensation, and employee assistance program. Chart 5 illustrates the compensation components. Chart 5- Personnel Salariesand Benefits OtherFringes 9% Health 13% Retirement 21% Department Initiatives Salaries 57% Staff prepared each department's budget based on key assumptions, accomplishments in FY 2017/18, major initiatives for FY 2018/19, and department goals and related objectives. Tables 5 through 15 present the key initiatives and summary of expenditures expenses for each department. Executive Management • Continue project development and delivery asthe key Measure A priority. • Fostergrowth in usage of the RCTC 91 Express Lanesand ensure itsfinancial success. • MonitorSR91 corridoroperationsand effectiveness. • Continue planning efforts to advance pancrnger rail service in the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Passcorridor. " Advocate for state and federal investments in transportation to fund needed transportation prioritiesin the County and stimulate the local economy. " Maintain regional cooperation and collaboration as a significant effort consistent with the philosophy and mission of the Commission. " Support a comprehensive social media outreach program to build awareness of the Commission and itsrole in the community. " Maintain an effective mid -sized transportation agency with dedicated staff. Table 5-Executive Management FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 254,600 $ 191,400 $ 191,100 $ 221,000 $ 29,600 15% Professional (252,000) 225,000 120,000 230,000 5,000 2% :Lpport 70,600 90,900 80,500 88,600 (2,300) -3% TOTAL $ 73,200 $ 507,300 $ 391,600 $ 539,600 $ 32,300 6% Administra tion " Provide high quality support servicesto the Commission and to internal and external customers. " Enhance the electronic recordsmanagement system. " Provide timely communicationsto Commissioners. " Update technology to improve internal procesccsand interaction with the public. " Support and develop a motivated workforce with a framework of activities and practicesthat comply with employment lawsand regulations. " Employ and recruit a dynamic and talented workforce. Table 6-Administration FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 585,500 $ 473,600 $ 473,300 $ 755,700 $ 282,100 60% Professional 285,900 533,500 518,400 667,100 133,600 25% 8ipport 656,800 977,300 763,500 986,800 9,500 1% Capital Outlay 87,400 635,000 525,000 530,000 (105,000) -17% Debt rvice 24,900 - - - - N/A TOTAL $ 1,640,500 $ 2,619,400 $ 2,280,200 $ 2,939,600 $ 320,200 12% Ede mal Affairs " Develop effective partnerships with transportation providers to communicate a unified me:.ti ige to Congressregarding mobility needs. " Advocate positions in the State Legislature and in Congress that advance the County's transportation interests. " Continue a leadership role in formulating a countywide direction on federal transportation policies. " Conduct a concerted outreach effort to new federal and state representatives on local transportation issues. " Utilize modern technology to support a robust public communication and engagement effort focusing on accessible and transparent communication of the Commission'sprojects. " Develop marketing and communication plans for the RCTC 91 Express Lanes and commencement of construction of the 1-15 ExpressLanesproject. " Continue the public outreach program, "Operation Lifesaver", targeting schools in close proximity to railroad trackson rail safety education, engineering, and enforcement. Table 7—ExtemaIAffairs FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 654,200 $ 877,100 $ 876,400 $ 813,100 $ (64,000) -7% Professional 686,900 1,135,500 1,105,500 1,003,400 (132,100) -12% apport 86,900 181,600 176,700 412,400 230,800 127% TOTAL $ 1,428,000 $ 2,194,200 $ 2,158,600 $ 2,228,900 $ 34,700 2% Rnance • Continue appropriate uses of long- and short-term financing to advance 2009 Measure A projectsof the Commission. • Apply the sales tax revenue forecast update to update a financing plan to support the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan. • Provide support to the 91 Express Lanes toll operations contractor's back office to ensure the properaccounting of toll revenuesand operationsand maintenance costs. • Keep abreast of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) technical activities affecting the Commission's accounting and financial reporting activities and implement new pronouncements. • Upgrade the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system to benefit all staff in the management of accounting and project information and automation of a paperlessworkflow system. • Manage a centralized procurements process in order to strengthen controls and ensure consistency in the application of procurement policies and procedures and adherence to applicable lawsand regulations. • Support outreach activities to encourage disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) and small businessenterprise (SBE) participation in variouscontracts. Table 8—Finance FY 16/ 17 FY 17/ 18 FY 17/ 18 FY 18/ 19 Do lla r Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 967,500 $ 1,110,200 $ 1,109,600 $ 1,218,300 $ 108,100 10% Professional 1,608,400 2,195,200 1,520,500 2,084,700 (110,500) -5% 6Lpport 941,500 964,000 471,800 543,500 (420,500) -44% Capital Outlay 600 280,000 85,000 513,700 233,700 83% TransfersOut 10,000,000 13,277,000 13,199,900 13,183,400 (93,600) -1 TOTAL $ 13,518,000 $ 17,826,400 $ 16,386,800 $ 17,543,600 $ (282,800) -2 Planning a nd Progra mming • Monitor funding authority and responsibility related to the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and impactson the STIP caused by the state budget issues. • Ensure administration and implementation of STIP/Regional Improvement Program (RIP), Active Transportation Program (ATP), and other funded projects consistent with California Transportation Commission (CTC), California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and Southern California Association of Governments(AG) policies. • Continue to strategically program projects for all local agencies countywide into the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (RIP) and obligate funds in an expeditious manner for the maximum use of all available funding, including monitoring the use of such funding to prevent from lapsing. • Monitor all projects programmed to receive 2009 Measure A, TUMF, state, and federal fundsto ensure timely delivery and prevent fundsfrom lapsing. • Focus on interregional concerns and maintain effective working relationships involving various multi -county transportation issues, including goods movement. • Coordinate planning efforts with regional and local agencies relating to the development of Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable CommunitiesStrategy (RTP/SCS) and greenhouse gas reduction (GHG) implementation guidelines. • Participate in the development of CTC'sATPprogram guidelinesto represent the County'sbest interest in program funding. • Ad minister the S3821 Bicycle and Pedestrian FacilitiesProg ram (S3821). " Continue the development of a countywide integrated long-range transportation plan consistent with local, regional, and state planning requirements. Table 9-Planning and Programming FY 16/ 17 Actual FY 17/ 18 Revised Budget FY 17/ 18 FY 18/ 19 Projected Budget Dollar Percent Change Change Personnel Professional Rapport Projects and Operations Tra nsfersOut TOTAL $ 1,023,200 117,700 27,400 1,372,700 $ 2,541,000 $ 983,400 $ 983,400 $ 1,147,400 620,500 177,400 295,500 18,300 14,500 19,100 11,384,900 4,978,000 18,046,800 870,300 762,600 1,017,400 13,877,400 $ 6,915,900 $ 20,526,200 $ 164,000 (325,000) 800 6,661,900 147,100 $ 6,648,800 17% -52 % 4% 59 % 17% 48 % Rail Maintenance and Operations " Asa member of the RRA, continue active participation in the governance and operationsof the Metrolink commuter rail system. " Continue the planning and implementation of capital improvements at the commuter rail stationsin the County, including security and rehabilitation projectsand parking requirements. " Continue to support and evaluate activities related to the Perris Valley Line (PVL) service, such as promoting ridership. " Establish the best approach to build, maintain, and operate cost effective and environmentally sustainable facilitiesthat meet the public'stransportation needs. " Lead the service development processand actively coordinate with all stakeholdersalong the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Passcorridorfor intercity pascPnger rail %rvice. " Advance the next generation rail feasibility study to evaluate future growth opportunities for passenger rail in the County. Table 10-Rail Maintenance and Operations Personnel Pro fe ssio n a I Rapport Projects and Operations Capital Outlay Tra nsfe rs Out TOTAL FY 16/ 17 Actual $ 755,400 1,463,200 1,891,100 20,181,400 7,500 $ 24,298,600 FY 17/ 18 Revised Budget $ 732,700 $ 4,404,000 3,391,100 27,665,700 90,000 948,500 $ 37,232,000 $ FY 17/ 18 FY 18/ 19 Projected Budget 728,300 2,407,700 2,919,800 22,923,900 80,000 908,500 29,968,200 Dolla r Change $ 88,200 (1,180,000) (70,400) 1,113,100 2,500 (65,600) Percent Change 12% -27 % -2 % 4% 3% -7 % Public and Specialized Transit $ 820,900 3,224,000 3,320,700 28,778,800 92,500 882,900 $ 37,119,800 $ (112,200) 0% " SLpport innovative programs that provide transit assistance in hard to serve rural areas or for ridershaving very special transit needsand monitorfunding of these programs. " Continue long-range planning activities to ensure that anticipated revenues are in line with projected levelsof service by transit operators. " Continue public transit operator oversight and fiduciary responsibilitiesto ensure completion of annual fiscal auditsand state triennial performance auditsin accordance with lDA regulations. " Coordinate with operators for major capital purchases and investments into new rolling stock and other system improvementsin orderto maintain a viable on -hand reserve. " Coordinate with transit operatorsthe provision of connecting busservice to PVLstations. Table 11 -Public and Specialized Transit Personnel Professional amport Projects and Operations Tra nsfers Out 70TAL FY 16/17 Actual $ 366,800 126,800 39,400 82,265,500 21,786,700 $ 104,585,200 FY 17/ 18 Revised Budget $ 415,500 204,300 88,700 122,010,600 24,934,200 $ 147,653,300 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Dollar Percent Projected Budget Change Change 397,700 $ 450,200 $ 34,700 8% 171,800 314,000 109,700 54% 53,800 63,900 (24,800) -28% 104,281,700 159,303,300 37,292,700 31% 24,786,400 28,287,300 3,353,100 13% 129,691,400 $ 188,418,700 $ 40,765,400 28% Commuter Assista nce • Improve the suite of services and outreach to rideshare participants and employer partners, including personalized information and electronic accessand distribution. • Maintain and grow employer partnerships through value-added services and tools for ridesharing programs. • Maintain the long-term partnership with San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) to manage and implement a "sister" commuter assistance program for residents and employersin San Bernardino County. • Optimize park and ride facilities to support car/vanpool/buspool arrangements and facilitate transit connections. • Operate a cost-effective program within the County that results in reduction of single occupant vehicles. Table 12— Commuter Assistance FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 257,000 $ 264,800 $ 264,400 Professional 359,000 799,700 707,200 Support 57,100 257,400 247,200 Projects and Operations 2,013,000 2,821,100 2,642,100 TransfersOut - 1,712,300 1,048,000 -rO TA $ 2,686,100 $ 5,855,300 $ 4,908,900 Motorist Assistance $ 288,200 449,700 342,500 3,420,900 1,696,500 $ 6,197,800 $ 23,400 9 % (350,000) -44 % 85,100 33 % 599,800 21 % (15,800) -1 % $ 342,500 6 % • Ascossopportunitiesforefficiency related to the call box program operations. • Maintain a high benefit -to -cost ratio related to the performance of the FSP program and expand service if funding opportunitiesarise. • Transition from a locally provided 1E511 system to a regional southern California 511 solution. • Continue the call box system program to serve as a "safe net" for stranded motorists in the County. Table 13— Motorist Assistance FY 16/ 17 Actual FY 17/ 18 Revised Budget FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Projected Budget Change Change Personnel Professional Support Projects and Operations TransfersOut TOTAL $ 126,000 $ 405,500 388,600 3,257,100 1,068,400 $ 5,245,600 $ 154,000 $ 518,000 298,900 3,723,000 1,257,500 5,951,400 $ 153,000 $ 200,000 $ 46,000 30% 460,200 528,200 10,200 2% 155,000 290,000 (8,900) -3% 3,254,000 5,167,700 1,444,700 39% 1,257,500 3,820,500 2,563,000 204% 5,279,700 $ 10,006,400 $ 4,055,000 68% Capital Project Development and Delivery • Continue project work on the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan projects, including the 1-15 Express Lanes project, SR60 truck climbing lanes, SR79 realignment, Mid County Parkway, and Pachappa underpassproject. • Provide IUMF regional arterial funding and support to local jurisdictions for regional arterial project engineering, right of way acquisition, and construction. • Provide 2009 Measure A funding to the incorporated cities and the County for local streets and roads maintenance, repair, and construction and to the Coachella Valley Asuciation of Governments (CVAG)for highwaysand regional arterials. • Develop strategiesto implement alternative financing structuresincluding public toll roads. • Maintain a right of way acquisition and management program in support of capital projects and in the most cost effective manner within project schedules, while adhering to federal and state regulations. • Maintain and manage the access, use, safety, and security of Commission -owned properties including commuter rail stations, properties in acquisition process, and income -generating properties. Table 14 —Capital Project Development and Delivery FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 3,306,500 $ 3,606,400 $ 3,625,000 $ 3,836,900 $ 230,500 6% Professional 18,980,600 10,260,200 9,242,000 8,723,600 (1,536,600) -15% 3apport 710,500 951,500 614,000 632,700 (318,800) -34% Projectsand Operations 310,863,200 464,272,500 319,135,100 533,911,200 69,638,700 15% Capital Outlay 5,574,900 5,221,300 3,000,000 3,550,000 (1,671,300) -32% Debt Service 136,530,500 659,804,900 653,859,700 69,555,700 (590,249,200) -89% Transfers Out 175,903,300 266,623,800 255,699,000 126,704,100 (139,919,700) -52% TOTAL $ 651,869,500 $ 1,410,740,600 $ 1,245,174,800 $ 746,914,200 $ (663,826,400) -47% Toll Operations • Manage the operations of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes adhering to the Commission's91 Express Lanes Toll Policy. • Manage toll operations using investment grade traffic and revenue studies and cost estimate assumptionsspecific to each expresslane facility. • Continue 1-15 Express Lanes toll planning through development of business rules and agency agreements. • Provide timely and effective reporting of toll operation metrics including revenue, transactions, carpool usage, and performance indicators. • Participate in the California Toll Operators Committee to advance regional and statewide tolling initiatives, technology, interoperability, and coordination among California toll agencies. Table 15—Toll Operations FY 16/17 FY17/18 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Personnel $ 148,700 $ 745,100 $ 644,600 $ 603,000 $ (142,100) -19% Professional 99,500 1,436,100 1,200,200 2,061,000 624,900 44% SLpport and Maintenance 897,600 4,228,500 3,374,300 4,576,700 348,200 8% Projectsand Operations 1,893,900 7,984,500 6,711,200 8,786,100 801,600 10% Capital Outlay - 650,000 921,000 1,340,000 690,000 106% Debt Service 2,021,200 7,119,900 7,119,900 27,119,900 20,000,000 281% Transfers Out 1,392,200 4,052,900 709,900 6,307,200 2,254,300 56% TOTAL $ 6,453,100 $ 26,217,000 $ 20,681,100 $ 50,793,900 $ 24,576,900 94% Fund Balances the projected total fund balance asof June 30, 2018 is$789,451,200. the Commission'sexpectsthe FY2018/19 budgeted activities to result in a $178,649,100 decrease of total fund balance at June 30, 2019 to $610,802,100. the primary cause of the decrease is project activities in FY 2018/19 related to the 1-15 Express Lanes project, Mid County Parkway project, toll operations, Riverside station layover facility, 1UMF regional arterial projects, and public transit allocations. Table 16 presents the components of the projected fund balance by fund type and program at June 30, 2019. Table 16-Projected Fund Balances by Fund Type and Program at June 30, 2019 13verside County Transportation Commission $610,802,100 General Fund Baecial Revenue Funds Capital Projects Funds $19,821,100 $412,352,600 $128,352,900 Management 3'11./ices Planning and Programming Rail Maintenance and Operations $3,821,500 3,943,900 12,055,700 Measure A Western County: Bond Financing Commuter Assista nce Economic Development Highways Restricted for: 1-15 Express LanesllFiA Reserve Intia1 Loan Local 3reetsand Roads New Corridors Public and Baecialized Tra net Rail Regional Arterials Measure A Coachella Valley: Highwaysand Regional Arterial Local 3reetsand Roads B>ecialized Transit $4,478,800 12,408,900 10,616,800 52,968,500 3,000,000 1,000 4,057,100 7,569,300 14,674,300 42,044,800 37,340,200 1,300 2,510,600 Measure A Palo Verde Valley Local 3reetsand Roads 600 Other Agency Projects Fund 33132 Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass Motorist Assistance State Tra n sit Assistance Local Transportation Fund 45,000 0 33,800 7,312,000 54,508,300 75,497,200 TUM F: CEfAP Regional Arterials 51,958,000 31,326,100 Highways Restricted for: 1-15 Express Lanes TRA Reserve Advances Receivable $ 90,819,193 16,500,000 21,033,707 Debt %rvice Fund $21,882,200 Restricted for Debt rvice $21,882,200 Enterprise Fund $28,393,300 Rverside 91 Express La nes Restricted for: 91 Project 11RA Reserve $8,393,300 20,000,000 Chart 6 illustrates the actual and projected trends in fund balances for each governmental and enterprise fund type from FY2015/16through FY2018/19. Chart 6-Projected Fund Balance Trends by Fund Type FY2016-2019 $601,000,000 $501,000,000 $401,000,000 $301,000,000 $201,000,000 $101,000,000 $1,000,000 General Fund qpecial Revenue Funds Budget Summary Capital Rojects Funds 111 Debt Service Fund Enterprise Fund uFY 15/16 mFY16/17 uFY 17/18 iiFY 18/19 the overall budget for FY 2018/19 is presented in Table 17 by summarized line items, Table 18 by operating and capital classifications, and Table 19 by fund type. Highway, rail, and regional arterial program expendituresby project are summarized in Table 20. Table 17 — Budget Comparative by Summarized Line Item FY 2017-2019 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Revenues Measure A Sales Tax L1FSslesTax STA SaIesTax Federal Reimbursements Sate Reimbursements Local Reimbursements IUMFRevenue Tolls, Penalties, and Fees Other Revenue Investment Income 101AL Revenues $ 175,320,200 $ 181,000,000 $ 181,000,000 88,206,900 91,000,000 91,000,000 6,432,600 10,469,000 20,204,800 20,201,700 78,563,200 105,408,300 8,538,500 16,589,100 8,275,100 3,727,400 6,840,100 7,435,100 19,594,800 22,250,000 22,250,000 10,125,300 16,835,800 42,812,600 6,746,000 2,803,700 574,200 4,495,300 3,509,400 7,595,300 343,388,700 429,860,300 486,555,400 Expend itures/ Expenses Personnel Sala riesand Benefits 8,445,400 9,554,200 9,446,800 Professional and Sipport Professional %rvices 23,881,500 22,332,000 17,630,900 Sipport Costs 5,767,500 11,448,200 8,871,100 101AL Professional and Sipport Costs 29,649,000 33,780,200 26,502,000 Projects and Operations Program Operations 15,528,100 28,156,000 24,474,400 Engineering 3,167,700 12,007,900 8,315,100 Construction 35,515,800 75,075,100 40,632,100 Design Build 170,452,800 192,599,700 145,452,500 Right of Way/Land 27,343,800 88,112,500 36,935,900 Operating and Capital Disbursements 103,163,800 154,505,600 130,653,500 S)ecial S udies 213,800 3,952,000 2,425,000 Local Sreetsand Roads 51,864,000 55,037,500 55,037,500 Reg iona I Arterials 14,597,000 30,416,000 20,000,000 101AL Pro jects a nd Operations 421,846,800 639,862,300 463,926,000 Debt %rvice Principal Paym ents 27,317,200 62,145,000 62,120,000 Interest Payments 46,705,400 54,712,600 54,712,600 Cost of Issuance 654,000 3,767,200 2,257,100 101AL Debt %rvice 74,676,600 120,624,800 119,089,700 Capital Outlay 5,670,400 6,876,300 4,611,000 101ALExpend ituresrExpenses 540,288,200 810,697,800 623,575,500 Excess(deficiency)of Revenues over (under)Expenditures/Expenses (196,899,500) (380,837,500) (137,020,100) Other Rnancing Uroes(Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out Debt Proceeds 11RA Loan Proceeds Payment to Escrow Agent Bond Premium Net Rnancing Sburces(Uses) Excess(deficiency)of Revenues over (under) Expend itures/Expensesand Other Rnancing 9ources(Uses) Beginning Fund Balance 188,488,900 (210,150,600) 106,140,000 143,358,100 (63,900,000) 8,414,000 313,676,500 (313,676,500) 636,250,000 81,810,000 (546,300,000) 119,722,000 298,371,800 (298,371,800) 632,775,000 (541,889,900) 119,713,800 172,350,400 291,482,000 210,598,900 (24,549,100) (89,355,500) 73,578,800 740,421,500 715,872,400 715,872,400 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 715,872,400 $ 626,516,900 $ 789,451,200 $ 187,000,000 94,000,000 23,203,600 59,105,700 165,442,400 24,037,900 22,922,200 36,940,500 539,000 3,408,000 616,599,300 10,354,700 19,581,200 11,276,900 30,858,100 25,940,100 35,733,800 126,358,000 188,565,500 92,220,600 199,973,300 1,672,000 56,951,500 30,000,000 757,414,800 25,965,000 50, 710, 600 76,675,600 6,026,200 881,329,400 (264,730,100) 181,899,300 (181,899,300) 106,081,000 (20,000,000) 86,081,000 (178,649,100) 789,451,200 $ 610.802.100 $ 6,000,000 3% 3,000,000 3% 12,734,600 122% (19,457,500) -25% 148,853,300 897% 17,197,800 251 % 672,200 3% 20,104,700 119% (2,264,700) -81% (101,400) -3% 186,739,000 43% 800,500 8 % (2,750,800) -12% (171,300) -1% (2,922,100) -9% (2,215,900) -8% 23,725,900 198% 51,282,900 68% (4,034,200) -2% 4,108,100 5 % 45,467,700 29% (2,280,000) -58% 1,914,000 3% (416,000) -1 % 117,552,500 18% (36,180,000) -58% (4,002,000) -7% (3,767,200) -100% (43,949,200) -36% (850,100) -12 % 70,631,600 9% 116,107,400 -30% (131,777,200) -42 % 131,777,200 -42% (636,250,000) -100% 24,271,000 30% 526,300,000 -96% (119,722,000) -100% (205,401,000) -70% (89,293,600) 100% 73,578,800 10% $ (15,714,800) -3% Table 18 - Operating and Capital Budget FY 2018/19 FY 18/ 19 FY 18/ 19 FY 18/ 19 Operating Budget Capital Budget TOTAL Budget Revenues Measure A SaIesTax $ 25,827,000 $ 161,173,000 LTF &Ile s Tax 94, 000, 000 STA ailesTax 23,203,600 - Federal Reimbursements 5,978,000 53,127,700 Sate Reimbursements 7,890,700 157,551,700 Local Reimbursements 3,557,900 20,480,000 TU M F Rev e n ue 22, 922,200 Tolls, Penalties, and Fees 36,940,500 Other Revenue 539,000 Investment Income 914,400 2,493,600 TOTAL Revenues 161,371,600 455,227,700 Expenditures/Expenses Personnel &i la ries a nd Benefits 5,791,200 4,563,500 Professiona I a nd alp port Professional cervices 8,745,600 10,835,600 SLpport Costs 6,066,900 5,210,000 TOTAL Professiona I and alp port Costs 14,812,500 16,045,600 Projects and Operations Program Operations 11,317,400 14,622,700 Engineering 1,650,000 34,083,800 Construction 4,200,000 122,158, 000 Design Build 188, 565, 500 Fight of Way and Land 92,220,600 Operating and Capital Disbursements 184,223,300 15,750,000 Special Studies 1,622,000 50,000 Local areetsand Roads 56,951,500 Re g io na l A rt a ria is 30, 000,000 TOTAL Projects and Operations 203,012,700 554,402,100 Debt rvice Principal Payments 25,965,000 Interest Payments 50,710,600 TOTAL Debt Service 76,675,600 Capital Outlay 1,136,200 4,890,000 TOTAL Expenditures/Expenses 224,752,600 656,576,800 Excess(deficiency)of Revenues over (under) Expenditures/Expenses Other Financing Sources (Uses) Tra nsfe rs In Transfers Out 11F1A Loan Proceeds Payment to Escrow Agent Net Financing Sources (Uses) Excess (d eficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expend itures/Expensesand Other Financing Sources (Uses) Beginning Fund Balance (63,381,000) (201,349,100) 40, 792, 300 141,107, 000 (48,421,400) (133,477,900) 106,081,000 (20, 000,000) (7,629,100) 93,710,100 (71,010,100) (107,639,000) 255,150,100 534, 301,100 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 184,140,000 $ 426,662,100 $ 187, 000, 000 94,000,000 23,203,600 59,105, 700 165,442,400 24,037,900 22, 922, 200 36, 940, 500 539,000 3,408,000 616, 599, 300 10,354,700 19,581,200 11,276,900 30, 858,100 25, 940,100 35, 733, 800 126, 358, 000 188, 565, 500 92, 220, 600 199, 973, 300 1,672,000 56,951,500 30, 000, 000 757,414,800 25, 965, 000 50,710,600 76,675,600 6,026,200 881,329,400 (264, 730,100) 181,899,300 (181,899,300) 106,081,000 (20, 000, 000) 86,081,000 (178,649,100) 789,451,200 $ 610, 802,100 Table 19 — Budget by Fund Type FY 2018/19 FY 18/19 General Fund Special%venue Ca p ita I Projects Debt %rvice Enterprise TOTAL Budget Revenues Measure A Sales Tax LTFRalesTax SfA SaIesTax Federal Reimbursements Rate Reimbursements Local Reimbursements lUMFRev enue Tolls, Penalties, and Fees Other Revenue Investment Income TOTAL Revenues Expend itures/Expenses Personnel Se lariesand Benefits Professional and Rapport Professional rvices Rapport Costs TOTAL Professional and Rapport Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations Engineering Construction Design Build Fight of Way/Land Operating and Capital Disbursements RpecialRudies Local Rreets and gads %giona I Arterials TOTAL Projects and Operations Debt %rvice Principal Payments Interest Payments TOTAL Debt %rvice Capital Outlay TOTAL Expenditures/Expenses Excess(deficiency)of Revenues over (under)Expenditures Expenses Other Rna ncing S3urces(Uses) Transfers In Transfers Out 11RA Loan Proceeds Payment to Escrow Agent Net Rnancing Sburces(Uses) Excess(deficiency)of Revenues over (under)ExpendituresExpensesand Other Rnancing Sources (Uses) Beginning Fund Balance ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 19,821,100 $ 412,352,600 $ 3,978,000 3,181, 700 1,113,100 8,371,400 $ 187,000,000 94,000,000 23,203,600 52,327,500 162,260,700 14,424,800 22,922,200 539,000 98,600 2,049,800 558,727,600 5,069,600 4,369,700 5,415,400 9,785,100 4,682,100 13,150,500 1,284,800 14,435,300 2,728,800 14,425,200 1,650,000 34,083,800 1,800,000 124,558,000 188,565,500 92,220,600 25,055,000 174,918,300 1,622,000 50,000 56,951,500 30,000,000 955,400 955,400 2,800,200 162,900 2,963,100 $ 187,000,000 94,000,000 23,203,600 59,105,700 165,442,400 8,500,000 24,037,900 22,922,200 36,940,500 36,940,500 539,000 141,300 3,408,000 45,581,800 616,599,300 603,000 10,354,700 2,061,000 4,576,700 6,637,700 19,581,200 11,276,900 30,858,100 8,786,100 25,940,100 35,733,800 126,358,000 188,565,500 92,220,600 199,973,300 1,672,000 56,951,500 30,000,000 32,855,800 715,772,900 25,965,000 43,590,700 8,786,100 757,414,800 25,965,000 7,119,900 50,710,600 1,136,200 48,846,700 3,550,000 738,440,300 69,555,700 7,119,900 1,340,000 69,555,700 24,486,700 76,675,600 6,026,200 881,329,400 (40,475,300) (179,712,700) 35,342,300 74,001,300 (1,265,600) (126,481,800) 106,081,000 955,400 (66,592,600) 21,095,100 (264,730,100) (45,044,500) 72,555,700 (2,800,200) (6,307,200) (20,000,000) 181,899,300 (181,899,300) 106,081,000 (20,000,000) 34,076,700 53,600,500 (45,044,500) 69,755,500 (26,307,200) 86,081,000 (6,398,600) (126,112,200) (44,089,100) 3,162,900 26,219,700 538,464,800 172,442,000 128,352,900 $ (5,212,100) (178,649,100) 18,719,300 33,605,400 789,451,200 21,882,200 $ 28,393,300 $ 610,802,100 Table 20 — Highway, Regional Arterial, and Rail Programs FY 2018/19 Description HIGHWAY EIGINEBRNG 71/91 connector E3hanac 5R-74 comd or Grade separation projects Hamner Bridge widening 1-15 Express La nes 1-15 Express La nessouthem extension Mid County Pa rkwa y(MCP) MCPI-215/Racentia interchange MCPSrveeney mitigation Pachappa underpass Rverside County -Santa Ana Rver Trail (detailspresented in.%ctions 5.2 Planning and Programming and 5.3 Capital Projects) SR-60 truck climbing lanes 5R-79 Realignment General (details presented in 9: ction 5.2 Planning and Programming) General (detailspresented in fiction 5.3 Capital Projects) SJBTOTAL HIGHWAY EIGINEERNG REGIONAL ARTEIAL ENGINEERING 1-15 Railroad Canyon interchange Various Westem County MARA and lUM Fregional arterial projects SJBTOTAL REGIONAL ARTERIAL EVG IN B3dNG RAIL EVGINE-0NG Moreno Valley March Reld station upgrade Perris Va lley Une and other related mil projects Rverside Layover Facility Rverside station track and platform SJBTOTAL RAIL EJGINEMING TOTALHIGHWAY, REGIONALAREERA4 AND RAIL ENGIN EERNG HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION 15/91 Express La nes connector 91 Conid or Operations Project 91 Project 1-15 Express La nes I-15/Limonite interchange 1-215 comd or improvements (centre l seg menty�ott Road to Nuevo Road MCPI-215/Ra cantle Interchange MCPSveeney mitigation Mid County Pa rkway Pachappa underpass Rverside County -Santa Ana Rver Tra it (detailspresented in Sections 5.2 Panning and Programming and 5.3 Capital Projects) 5R-60 Truck Climbing Lanes General (detailspresented in fiction 5.2 Panning and Programming) General (detailspresented in fiction 5.3 Capital Projects) SJBTOTAL HIGHWAY CONSTRICTION FEG IO NAL ARTEIRAL CO NSIRJCTIO N Various Western County MARA and TUM Fregional arterial projects SJBTOTAL REGIONAL AR ERAL CONSTd1C11ON RAIL CONSTRUCTION Penis Va lley Line and other related mil projects Rverside Layover Fa cilky Rverside-La Serra station improvements Other Rverside Downtown mobility improvements (detailspresented in 81'ction 5.2 Rail) Other -Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass comd or (detailspresented in Section 5.2 Rail) SJBTOTAL RAIL CONSTRUCTION TOTALHIGHWAY, PEGIONALARRiRAL, AND R4ILCONSIRUCEON HIGHWAY DESGN BUILD 15/91 Express La nes connector 91 Comd or Operations Project 91 Project 1-15 Express La nes TOTALHIGHWAY DESIGN BULD HIGHWAY RGHTOF WAY AND LAND 60/215 East Junction high occupancy vehicle (HOV)lane connectors 71/91 connector 91 Project Grade separation projects 1-15 Express La nes 1-215 corridor improvements (centre l segmenty&ott Road to Nuevo Road Mid County Parkway MCPI-215/Racentia interchange MCPSveeney mitigation M SICP la nd acquistbn in Western County Pachappa underpass Rverside County -Santa Ana Rver Trail (detailspresented in Sections 5.2 Planning and Programming and 5.3 Capital Projects) 5R-60 truck climbing lanes 5R-74 curve widening 5R-74/1-15 to 7th Sreet 5R-91 HOV la nedAda ms Sreet to 60/91/215 interchange General (detailspresented in fiction 5.3 Capital Projects) SJBTOTAL HIGHWAY RGHTOF WAY AND LAND REGIONALARTETRAL RGHTOFWAY AND LAND 1-15 Railroad Canyon interchange Various Western County MARA and lUM Fregional arterial projects SJBTOTAL REGIONAL ARTERAL RGHTOFWAY AND LAND RAIL RGHTOFWAY AND LAND Perris Va lley Line and other related mil projects Rverside Layover Fa cilty Rverside-La Serra station improvements General SUBTOTAL RAIL PJGHTOFWAY AND LAND TOTALHIGHWAY, REGIONALARIE RAL, AND RAIL RGHTOF WAY AND LAND GRAND TOTAL HIG HWAY, REGIONALAR1ERIAL, AND RAIL PROGRAMS $ 3,950,000 400,000 11,550,000 500,000 150,000 4,000,000 3,350,000 1,600,000 450,000 388,000 970,000 615,000 300,000 1,650,000 324,500 30,197,500 2,400,000 364,300 2,764,300 1,100,000 22,000 350,000 1,300,000 2,772,000 $ 35.733.800 $ 5,772,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 9,350,000 30,000,000 925,000 2,600,000 4,050,000 650,000 12,460,000 10,208,000 25,200,000 500,000 1,950,000 106,665,000 7,358,000 7,358,000 1,735,000 5,110,000 1,790,000 1,300,000 2,400,000 12,335,000 $ 126 358 000 $ 47,982,600 4,500,000 1,132,900 134,950,000 $ 188.565.500 $ 50,000 5,100,000 24,000,000 20,000,000 1,402,500 5,000 1,100,000 20,600,000 25,000 3,000,000 625,000 255,000 385,000 4,000 60,000 635,000 674,100 77,920,600 4,000,000 10,020,000 14,020,000 25,000 100,000 5,000 150,000 280,000 $ 92,220,600 Gann Appropriations Limit In November 1979, the voters of the State approved Proposition 4, commonly known as the Gann Initiative (Gann). the proposition created Article XIIIB of the State Constitution, placing limits on the amount of revenue that can be spent by public agencies from the "proceeds of taxes." In 1980, the State Legislature added Section 7910 to the Government Code, providing that the governing body of each local jurisdiction must establish, by resolution, an appropriations limit for the following year. The appropriations limit for any fiscal year is equal to the previous year'slimit adjusted for population changesand changesin the California per capita income. the Commission is subject to the requirements of Article XIIIB. Gann appropriations limits are calculated for and applied to the Commission. In accordance with the requirements of Article XIIIB implementing legislation, the Board approved Resolution No. 18-009 on June 13, 2018, establishing appropriations limits for the Commission at $464,186,785. the FY 2018/19 budget appropriated $299,410,700 in taxes for the Commission, falling well within the limits set by the Gann. Based on historic trends and future projections, it appears the Commission's use of the proceedsof taxes, asdefined by Article XIIIB, will continue to fall below the appropriations limit. the calculation forthe FY2018/19 appropriationslimit isasfollows: FY2017/18AppropriationsLimit $441,572,195 FY2018/19adjustment: x 1.0512138 •Change in Califomia percapita personal income 1.0367% ((3.67+100)/ 100= 1.0367) • Change in Population, Riverside County • Calculation offactorfor FY2018/19 1.0140% ((1.40 + 100) / 100 = 1.0140) 1.0367 x 1.0140 = 1.0512138 1FY 2018/19 Appropriations Limit $464,186,785 • $441, 572,195 x 1.0512138 = $464,186,785 Source: California per capita income —California Department of Finance Population, Riverside County —Califomia Department of Finance Fina nc is I Ove rview Fiscal Accountability Policies As the steward of local, state, and federal resources, RCTC maintains financial policies that promote fiduciary responsibility and organizational excellence. Financial Fla nnin • Balanced Budget Administration Retirement Benefits Capital Projects Reserves RCTC adopts an annual budget in which operating and capital expenditures and other financing uses are equal to or less than identified revenuesand otherfinancing sourcesaswell asavailable fund balances. Allocations from local and state sources and toll operations fund administrative costs, including salariesand benefits. o Administrative salaries and benefits cannot exceed 1% of Measure A salestax revenues. o Administrative costs will not exceed 4%of Measure A sales tax revenues (inclusive of the 1%salary limitation). RCTC contributes 100% of the annual requirement related to its proportionate share of the net pension liability and to the postretirement health care benefits. Multi -year capital projects are consistent with the strategic plan and budgeted by fiscal year, based on best available estimates. RCTC establishes and maintains reserves in accordance with Measure A and IDA policiesaswell asdebt agreements. Revenues RCTC prepares annual and mid -year revised revenue projections to ensure use of current and relevant data; staff may adjust amounts during the budget processto reflect the most current economic trends. RCTC-adopted policies establish congestion pricing in order to optimize throughput on toll facilities while generating revenue to meet all financial commitmentsrelated to: o Debt issued to construct or repair any portion of the toll facility, payment of debt service, and satisfaction of other covenants and obligations related to indebtednessof the toll facility, including applicable reserves; o Development, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, improvement, reconstruction, administration, and operation of the toll facilities, including toll collection and enforcement and applicable reserves; and o Projectswithin the corridor which generated the revenue. RCTC uses local funding sources to maximize federal and state funding of projects. Sale of Properties RCTC returns proceeds from the disposition of excess properties to the programsthat provided the funding sourcesforthe property acquisition. 6cpe nd itures✓ 6cpe nses Prio ritie s Accountability RCTC reviewsestablished prioritiesfor planning and programming of capital projectsannually. RCTC compares actual expenditures!expensesto the budget on at least a quarterly basis and appropriately notes, explains, and justifies significant deviations. RCTC ensures competitive, transparent, objective, and fair procurement selection processesin accordance with policiesadopted on June 13, 2018. Capital and Intangible Assets On a government -wide basis, RCTC recordscapital and intangible assetsat historical costs, estimated historical costs if purchased or constructed, or estimated fair value at date of donation. RCTC maintains such assets in a state of good repair and safeguards them from misuse and misappropriation. o RCTC generally does not capitalize infrastructure, which title will be vested with Caltransorother govemmental agency. o RCTC depreciates capital and amortizes intangible asccts over the estimated useful life or service concession term. Debt Mana • ement Debt Limitation Management Coverage Outstanding sales tax revenue debt cannot exceed $975 million, in accordance with Measure K approved by a majority of the voters in November 2010; RCTC can issue toll -supported debt for specific highway projectsbased on amountsauthorized by the Commission. RCTC maintainsand updatesthe Debt Management Policy, asadopted on September 14, 2016, and Interest Rate Sivap Policy, as adopted July 12, 2006, for matters related to sales tax revenue and toll -supported indebtedness. RCTC maintains debt coverage ratios of 2.0xon all senior sales tax revenue debt and 1.3xon all toll -supported debt. RCTC issues debt for major capital projects including engineering, right of way, construction, and design -build; RCTC will not finance operating requirements except for initial toll operations. Costs of issuance, including the standard underwriter's discount, do not exceed 2% unless specifically authorized. All salestax revenue debt matures prior to the termination of 2009 Measure A on June 30, 2039; all toll -supported debt matures prior to the expiration of toll facility agreements. CashMana•ement Management Receipts RCTC invests funds in order of priority (safety, liquidity, and yield) in accordance with the Investment Policy, adopted on December 13, 2017, or debt agreements. Where possible, RCTC encourages receipt of funds by wire transfer to its accounts. RCTC makes cash disbursements to local jurisdictions and vendors/consultantsin a timely manner. RCTC maintains amounts in the bank operating account at the amount necessary to meet monthly expenditures expenses. Accountin• and Financial Reportin Accounting System RCTC maintains an ERP system that integrates project and toll operations accounting needsand improvesaccounting efficiency. RCTC issues a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR); separate financial reports for the OF, STA, Proposition 1B Rehabilitation and Security Project Accounts, SB 1 State of Good Repair (SGR) Program, Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP), and toll operations; and the State Controller's Transportation Planning Agency Financial Transactions Report and Government Compensation in California Report. An independent accounting firm conducts an annual audit of the Commission's accounting books and records; RCTC obtains audits of Measure A and TDA funding recipientsfor compliance and other matters in a timely manner. Functional Management Unlike many governments that provide direct services to the public, the Commission's overall responsibility is to manage transportation planning and funding for the County. As a result, its budget in terms of dollars, is comprised primarily of capital -related programs and projects; the operating component of the budget is related to multimodal programs (toll operations, transit planning, rail operations, and commuter and motorist assistance services). Management services, consisting of executive management, administration, external affairs, and finance, provide support to both capital and operating programs and projects. Chart 7 depicts the organization of the Commission'soversight and management functions. Chart 7 — Functional Organization Chart FY 2018/ 19 Human %musses Ad minlstrator — Accounting Assstant (2) .mor Office Assistant Budget Process 9oen1 of Commissioners D&ecutive Director Multimodal Services Director Management Analyst Planning 8 Rogre mming Director — .mor Management Analyst Project Delivery Director Toll Rogmm Director .mor Manag ement Analyst (2) Management Analyst Facilities Ad ministtitor petitions Manager The budget is the primary performance tool used to measure and control accountability of public agenciesfortaxpayer dollars. The budget communicatesto all stakeholders(i.e., elected officials, regional agencies, and citizens) how the investment they made will be put to use by providing detailed information on the specificsof resource allocation and uses. The Commission monitors progresson a monthly basis, and it makes revisionsand updatesasnecescary to reflect changing dynamicsand accommodate unplanned requests. Thisresultsin a budget document that is useful and meaningful as a benchmark against which to evaluate government accomplishmentsand/orchallengesand to a‘n^sscompliance with fiscal accountability. the budget process consists of six primary tasksconducted in phasesthroughout the fiscal year. Chart 8 illustrates the budget process for the development of the FY 2018/19 budget and monitoring of the FY2017/18 budget. Each task issummarized below. Chart 8 — Bud et Process ID Task Name Duration 2017 2018 J AISIOIN D J F M A M J 1 Short Term Strategic Direction Phase 140 days y _ 2 Resource Identification and Allocation Phase 200 days y 3 Needs Assessment Phase 120 days 4 Development and Review Phase 150 days y - 5 Adoption and Implementation Phase 60 days 6 Budget Roles and Responsibilities 365 days y Short -Tenn Strategic Direction Phase The first phase of the budget process is to determine the direction of the Commission in the short-term and to integrate thiswith the Commission's long-term goals and objectives, including the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan as discuIrrd in Section 5.3. Annually a workshop is held for the Board to evaluate and determine where the Commission plans to be and what it desires to accomplish over the next five to ten years. Annual reviews allow for timely responsiveness to any significant political, legislative, or economic developments that may occur locally, statewide, or nationally. Staff then adjusts its course based on the long-term strategic direction of the policy makers. Staff convenesbeginning in early January to both aarrssactual results, compared to the current year budget, and map changes in strategy for the ensuing fiscal year. Additionally staff reviews and, if necessary, updates Commission goalsand departmental mission statements. Those goals, upon review by the Board, become the Commission'sshort-term strategic direction. Resource Identification and Allocation Phase Simultaneous with the short-term strategic direction phase, staff focuses on available funding sources and estimated carryover amounts from the current year. The Commission analyzes its fund balances, the excess of fund assots over fund liabilities, for available appropriation in the following fiscal year. In actuality, resource identification occurs throughout the year, but it is finalized in the upcoming fiscal year budget. In connection with the long-term strategic planning process, the Commission determines borrowing needs, but it adjusts such amounts in the annual budget to reflect current information. Needs Assessment Phase Staff and consultants evaluate projects and studies for consideration in the next year. Project priority and sequencing set in the long-term strategic plan are the top candidates for budget submission. However, priorities may have changed due to economic necessities or political realities, resulting in rescheduling projects by acceleration or postponement. The Commission may add new projectsordelete existing priorities. Development and Review Phase Using all the data and information gathered from the previously mentioned stages, department managers submit their desired budgets to the Finance Department. Finance staff compiles the information, along with staff and overhead allocations, into a preliminary or draft budget. After review by the Executive Director and inclusion of the desired changes, staff presents the draft budget to the Board for input. Adoption and Implementation Phase Staff submits the proposed budget to the Commission at its May meeting, which marks the opening of a hearing scheduled to allow for public comment on the proposed budget. the Commission may choose, afterthe public hearing, to adopt the budget orto request additional information and/or changes to the budget. the budget, including the salary schedule, must be adopted no later than June 15 of each year. Upon adoption by the Commission, staff entersthe budget into the ERP system effective July 1 for the next fiscal year. Budget Development Summary Chart 9summarizesthe primary activities req uired for adoption of the budget. Chart 9 — Budget Development Timeline FY 2018/ 19 r • St off d e veto ps revenue projections. • Board approves soles tax revenue projections on January 10, 2018. • Staff develops deportment g oa k a n d objectives, proJecied FY2017/18 ❑ctuals, and proposed FY2018/19 Budget. 1 Budget Roles and Responsibilities • Board adopts Commission's FY 2C18/ 19 goofs and objectives an March 14, 2018. • Finance reconcikes and analyzes department budget proj ecfions and proposed budget. • Budget and Implementation Committee reviews and forwasds proposed FY2018/19 budgettoBocrd on Apri k 23, 2018. fr:Boord opens public hearing on Moy9, 2018 and reviews and receives comments on proposed budget. • Board receives f n al c ornments, c loses public heoring, and adopts budget on June i3, 201. Involvement in the budget permeates all staffing levels, as presented in Chart 10, at the Commission from clerical support staff to policy makers. Each program manager develops a detailed line item budget that consistsof the operating and/orcapital componentsand submits those budgets, by program, to the department director for review and concurrence. the department managers submit their budgets to the Chief Financial Officer by mid -March, and the Finance Department compiles the department budgets. Both the capital and operating budgets are combined into the draft budget for the entire Commission. lbe Chief Financial Officer and Executive Director review the entire budget for overall consistency with both the short- and long-term strategic direction of the Commission, appropriateness of funding sources for the identified projects and programs, and reasonableness of the operating and capital budget expenditures/expenses. Expenditure/expense activities of the funds are controlled at the budgetary unit, which is the financial responsibility level (General, Measure A, Motorist Assistance, LTF, STA, TUMF, Other Agency Projects, Capital Projects, Debt Service Funds, and Enterprise Fund) for each function (i.e., administration, operations, programs, intergovernmental distributions, debt service, capital outlay, and other financing uses). These functions provide the legal level of budgetary control (i.e., the level at which expenditures/expenses cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount). Budget -to -actual reports are available to program managers and directors on a real-time basis through the ERP system for informational and management purposes, including identification and evaluation of any significant budget variations. During the fiscal year, management hasthe discretion to transfer budgeted amounts within the financial responsibility unit according to function or may provide support for supplemental budget appropriations requests. Supplemental budget appropriation requests require the authorization of the Commission. The Commission may take action at any monthly meeting to amend the budget. In some years, the Finance Department may compile miscellaneous requests and submit a budget appropriations adjustment at mid -year to the Commission for approval. Those budget amendments approved by the Commission are incorporated into the budget, as they occur, and are reflected in the CAFRin the final budget amountsreported in the budgetary schedules. Chart 10 — Staff Organization Chart FY 2018/ 19 Procurement Manager Deputy Director of Fna nce Procurement — %nior Financial Analyst Analyst %nior Administrative A.stant Accountant — Accounting Technician (2) — Accounting Assistant 12) —$nior Office Asiganl Eatema I Affairs Director nior Management Analyst — Ad minigmtive Asagant Human Raeoumes Administrator Deputy Clerk of he Board Records Technician Boa ni of Coma i:ooers Executive Director Deputy Es cut. Director Management Analyst Banning BRogmmming Director %nior Management Analyst Transit Manager Management Analyst ` Management Analyst Commuter& Motorist Assgance Manager ` Management Analyst Facaect Delivery Director I Rogct 4) fbght of Way Manager _ %nior Management Analyst (2) — Management Analyst Fa c Ililies Adm Inistrator Toll Tec hnology Manager .nior Management Ana lyg Fund Budgets Budgetary Basis the Commission accounts for its budgeted funds using the modified and current financial resourcesmeasurement focusfor governmental fundsand the accrual basisof accounting and the economic resources measurement focus for enterprise funds. the basis of accounting isthe same asthe basisof budgeting. lhe Commission recognizesgovemmental fund revenueswhen measurable and available to meet current year obligations. Such revenues are available when guaranteed asto receipt, based on expenditure offunds(i.e., government matching funds), or certain to be received within 180 days of the end of the fiscal year. the Commission generally records governmental fund expenditures when it incurs a liability; however, debt service expenditures are recorded when the payment is due. Enterprise fund revenues are recognized when earned, and expensesare recorded when a liability is incurred, regardlessof the timing of related cash flows. Chart 11 illustrates total sources and uses by fund type for the FY 2018/19 budget. Chart 11 —Total Sources and Uses by Fund Type FY2018/19 90% - 80% - 70% - 60% - SO% - 40% - 30% - 20% - 10% - 0% 82% 81% 5% 5% 0% 4% General Fund Special Revenue Funds Capital Projects Funds Fund Structure 8% 7% 5� Debt Service Fund Enterprise Fund V Total Sources El Total Uses the Commission accounts for its sources and uses in 32 funds (Chart 12) categorized into five fund types: General fund, special revenue funds, capital projectsfunds, debt service fund, and enterprise funds. All of the Commission's funds are budgeted. lhere are three funds reported in the General fund and 25 in the special revenue funds. Two capital projects funds are used to account for capital project expenditures financed with short- or long-term debt proceeds. the Commission has one debt service fund to account for debt -related activity. In addition, the Commission hasone enterprise fund to account forthe RCTC 91 Express Lanesoperations. Chart 12 —Budgeted Funds Structure FY2018/19 General Fund • Adriliilisfr�l"ie n • Roll O xntkrrks& ivf<m llex-xxxe: • Planning & I'rogromming General Fund Overview Specici Revenue Fu n cl s I V119 Nleas re A • Western I C:a ur rty • I lltrl!vary • RSA r2tXWMeasureA • Wesi errr Courtly • 1lighways • luesrl S1xx,lsR Raul} • Public IronsR • Spcciatzad Irans4 • 3us Trcmv I • Palli Trnnsil Assistenert - New eariders • Bond Fir wtx;ir;g • Regional Arterials •Fcarnamlc Irk :vclt pa,,nril 1 . Coachella Valley • Hicahwev & Regional Ar Iexisk. •1 °cal Streets & koads •Speriafvrxrt Irnrsil • role Verde Valley • 1 ix Ail rx:h.& RI. xx.1, - Mr *SAFE •1 ncoI irnrspertatian funds •S to le 'Ransil Assistance •State et Ganef Repair • I t1MF - Coachella Volley Roil • Olt lei Agency I'ia;ecls Fund •SRL:la Capilui Projects Funds r Carnm xclal Papa -Safes lax Raids Debt Service Fund lhe Commission's General fund accounts for all activities not legally required or designated by Board action to be accounted for separately. For many public agencies, the General fund isthe largest fund; however, it is less significant for the Commission. the Commission's largest revenue source is Measure A, a locally levied sales tax that legally must be accounted for separately in special revenue funds. In addition to Commission administration and general operations, other General fund activities include commuter rail maintenance and operations as well as planning and programming. Table 21 presentsthe FY2018/19 budget for the General fund, followed by a discussion of significant componentsof the budget. Table 21 —General Fund FY2017-2019 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Revenues Measure A Sales Tax $ 3,250,000 $ $ - Federal Reimbursements 2,363,600 4,161,700 3,869,000 State Reimbursements 614,800 3,365,700 1,561,200 LacalReimbursements 1,175,000 734,600 Other Revenue 262,700 293,200 Investment Income 74,700 76,400 99,300 10TALRevenues 6,565,800 9,072,000 6,264,100 Expenditures Personnel Sa laries a nd Benefits 4,393,500 4,412,600 4,401,100 Professional and SLpport Professional Services 2,133,900 4,974,200 3,432,100 Support Costs 3,705,700 5,695,500 4,467,700 TOTAL Professional and SupportCosts 5,839,600 10,669,700 7,899,800 Projects and Operations Program Operations 2,658,900 2,856,500 2,522,100 Engineering 2,000,000 350,000 Construction (74,600) 2,984,200 950,000 Operating and Capital Disbursements 18,627,800 21,455,000 20,856,800 aiecial Studies 211,100 3,150,000 2,125,000 TOTAL Projectsa nd Operations 21,423,200 32,445,700 26,803,900 Debt rvice Principal Payments 17,200 Interest Payments 7,600 TOTAL Debt Service 24,800 - - Capital Outlay 95,500 1,005,000 690,000 lOTALExpenditures 31,776,600 48,533,000 39,794,800 Excess (deficiency) of Revenuesover (under) Expenditures (25,210,800) (39,461,000) (33,530,700) Other Financing Saurces(Uses) Transfers In 33,544,700 41,103,600 42,028,400 Transfers Out (1,551,800) (1,404,100) Net Fnancing Sources(Uses) 33,544,700 39,551,800 40,624,300 Excess(deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expend ituresand Other Fnancing Saurces(Uses) 8,333,900 90,800 7,093,600 Beginning Fund Balance 10,792,200 19,126,100 19,126,100 ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 19,126,100 $ 19,216,900 $ 26,219,700 The sourcesforthe General fund (Chart 13) consist of: 3,978,000 3,181,700 1,113,100 98,600 8,371,400 5,069,600 4,369,700 5,415,400 9,785,100 2,728,800 1,650,000 1,800,000 25,055,000 1,622,000 32,855,800 1,136,200 48,846,700 (40,475,300) 35,342,300 (1,265,600) 34,076,700 (6,398,600) 26,219,700 $ 19,821,100 $ N/A (183,700) 4% (184,000) -5% (61,900) -5% (293,200) -100% 22,200 29% (700,600) -8% 657,000 15 % (604,500) -12 % (280,100) -5% (884,600) -8% (127,700) -4 (350,000) -18% (1,184,200) -40% 3,600,000 17% (1,528,000) -49% 410,100 1% N/A N/A N/A 131,200 13% 313,700 1 % (1,014,300) 3% (5,761,300) -14% 286,200 -18% (5,475,100) -14% (6,489,400) -7147 % 7,093,600 37% $ 604,200 3% • Variousfederal, state and local reimbursementsfor planning activitiesand commuter rail station operationsand maintenance; • Investment income; • Transfersfrom variousfundsforthe allocation of administrative costs; • Transfers of OF sales tax revenues for planning, programming, and monitoring (PPM) activities; and • Transfersof L1FArticle 4 allocationsforcommuter rail operationsand capital. Chart 13—General Fund Sources FY 2018/19 Federal Reimbursements 9% Tra n sfe rs I n Y 81% Gate Reimbursements 7% Local Reimbursements 3% Prior to FY 2017/18, Measure A sales tax revenues included an off -the -top allocation for administrative costs. The Commission now allocates administrative costs based on a cost allocation plan and recognizesreimbursementsto the General fund from otherfundsastransfers in. The FY2018/19 General fund administrative allocation of $4,366,100 from Measure A may be adjusted based on actual expenditures, but in no event will it exceed 4%of total Measure A revenues(including administrative salariesand benefits). Federal reimbursements relate to station rehabilitation, and state reimbursements include STIP fundsforPPM activities. Local reimbursementsand otherrevenuesfrom local agencies relate to rail station security, other agency projects, and planning activities. The Commission allocates and transfers from the General fund a portion of LTF sales tax revenuesfor administration, planning and programming, and rail transit operations and capital for the following purposes: • General fund administration allocations funded with LTF sales tax revenues of $81,700 in FY2018/19 reflect a 51%decrease compared to the prior year. • State law sets planning allocations at 3% of estimated LTF sales tax revenues. The FY 2018/19 budget for planning allocations is $2,820,000. The FY 2017/18 revised budget of $3,090,000 includes the effect of the mid -year projection adjustment that includes the unapportioned carryover amount, which is not determined until after the prior year's fiscal yearend, and revised revenue projections. • LTF sales tax revenues of $683,300 in FY 2018/19 will fund General fund allocations for planning and programming activities. • Commuter rail operating and capital needs determine the amount of LTF allocations to the extent that revenues and reserved fund balance are available. The FY 2018/19 budget includes $21,200,000 in LTF allocations primarily to fund operating contribution expendituresto SCRRA and rail studies. • The FY 2018/19 budget includes LTF allocations of $2,000,000 for grade separation projects. The 2009 Measure A Western County rail fund will not transfer funds in FY 2018/19 for rail station maintenance and operations due to sufficient fund balance reserves; in prior years, LTF allocations primarily funded rail stations. Administrative transfers in from STA, TUMF, motorist assistance, toll operations, 93 132, and other agency project fundsof $4,191,200 in FY2018/19 increased from $3,661,100 in FY2017/18 due to a higher level of activity requiring administrative support. Chart 14—General Fund Uses FY 2018/19 CapitalOutlay 2% Projectsand Operations 66% Tra nste rs O ut I3% Personnel Salaries and Benefits 9% Pro fe ssio n a I ry ices 9% aipport Costs 11% Chart 14 depicts General fund uses. Personnel salaries and benefits expenditures increased $657,000 due to changes in the allocation of F7Es, increase to the Commission's contribution to employee health benefits, and merit -based salary increases. Professional costs decreased 12% compared to the prior year due to a reduction in professional services for rail planning and station development in the Coachella Valley. Support costs decreased 5%due to expenditures for station maintenance and operations, utilities, and security at the four new PVL stations. Projects and operations expenditures increased 1% due to program operations expenditures related to PVL station operations, operating contribution to 9CRRA for PVL operations, development of a countywide integrated long-range transportation plan, planning allocations, and a grade separation project. the FY 2018/19 operating and capital disbursements budget includes allocations of $22,100,000 for the Metrolink commuter rail subsidy. Capital outlay expenditures increased 13% due to information technology upgrades and station improvements. Transfers out of $1,265,600 reflect amounts to General fund administration from rail operationsand planning and programming activities. Special Revenue Funds Overview lhe Commission's special revenue funds are legally restricted as to use for Measure A projects and programs, IUMF projects, motorist assistance services, other agency project coordination, and funding transit operations and capital in the County. Table 22 is a summary of the special revenue funds' budgets, and Tables 23 through 34 present the individual budgets along with respective discussions. Table 22-Special Revenue Funds FY 2017 -2019 FY 16/ 17 FY 17/ 18 Actual Revised Budget FY 17/ 18 FY 18/ 19 Projected Budget Dollar Change Percent Change Revenues Measure ASaleSTax $ 172,070,200 $ 181,000,000 $ 181,000,000 L1FS lesTax 88,206,900 91,000,000 91,000,000 STA S3lesTax 6,432,600 10,469,000 20,204,800 Federal Reimbursements 15,061,800 71,655,000 98,748,000 Sate Reimbursements 7,923,700 13,223,400 6,713,900 Local Reimbursements 3,727,400 5,665,100 5,200,500 IUMFRevenue 19,594,800 22,250,000 22,250,000 Other Revenue 6,483,300 2,510,500 574,200 Investment Income 2,086,100 1,929,500 3,142,900 10TALRevenues 321,586,800 399,702,500 428,834,300 Expenditures Personnel Sa la ries a nd Benefits Professional and alp port Professional Services Sipport Costs TOTAL Professional and &ippon Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations Engineering Construction Design Build Fight of Way/Land Operating and Capital Disbursements �ecial Studies Local areetsand bads Regional Arterials TOTAL Projects a nd Operations Capital Outlay TOTAL Expenditures 3,903,200 4,396,500 4,401,100 11,356,100 14,511,700 12,046,600 1,164,200 1,524,200 1,026,800 12,520,300 16, 035, 900 13, 073,400 10,975,300 3,167,700 35,590,400 170,452,800 27,343,800 84,536,000 2,700 51,864,000 14,597,000 17,315,000 10,007,900 72,090,900 192,599,700 88,112,500 133,050,600 802,000 55,037,500 30,416,000 15,241,100 7,965,100 39,682,100 145,452,500 36,935,900 109,796,700 300,000 55,037,500 20,000,000 398,529,700 5,574,900 599,432,100 5,221,300 430,410,900 3,000,000 420,528,100 625,085,800 450,885,400 Excess(deficiency) of Revenuesover (under) Expenditures (98,941,300) Other Financing Sources(Uses) TransfersIn TransfersOut 11RA Loan Proceeds Net Rnancing Sources (Uses) Excess(deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expend itures a nd Other Rnancing Sources (Uses) 75,886,800 (82,625,200) 143,358,100 (225,383,300) (22,051,100) 158,952,900 (142,216,300) 81,810,000 145,277,200 (138,453,800) 136,619,700 98,546,600 6,823,400 37,678,400 Beginning Fund Balance 516,014,100 ENDING FUND BALANCE (126,836,700) (15,227,700) 553,692,500 553,692,500 $ 553,692,500 $ 426,855,800 $ 538,464,800 $ 187,000,000 94,000,000 23,203,600 52,327,500 162,260,700 14,424,800 22,922,200 539,000 2,049,800 558,727,600 4,682,100 13,150,500 1,284,800 14,435,300 14,425,200 34,083,800 124,558,000 188,565,500 92,220,600 174,918,300 50,000 56,951,500 30,000,000 715,772,900 3,550,000 738,440,300 (179,712,700) 74,001,300 (126,481,800) 106,081,000 53,600,500 (126,112,200) 538,464,800 $ 412,352,600 $ 6,000,000 3,000,000 12,734,600 (19,327,500) 149,037,300 8,759,700 672,200 (1,971,500) 120,300 3% 3% 122% -27% 1127% 155% 3% -79% 6% 159,025,100 40% 285,600 6% (1,361,200) -9% (239,400) -16% (1,600,600) -10% (2,889,800) -17% 24,075,900 241% 52,467,100 73% (4,034,200) -2% 4,108,100 5% 41,867,700 31% (752,000) -94% 1,914,000 3% (416,000) -1% 116,340,800 19% (1,671,300) -32% 113,354,500 18% 45,670,600 -20% (84,951,600) 15,734,500 24,271,000 -53% -11 % 30% (44,946,100) -46% 724,500 -1% (15,227,700) -3% $ (14,503,200) -3% The Commission accounts for Measure A and LlF sales taxes, STA allocations, Western County 1UMF, state budgetary allocations, and vehicle registration fees in the 25 special revenue funds. Federal, state, and local reimbursementsand transfers in consisting principally of debt proceeds supplement the Measure A sales tax revenues. Chart 15 illustrates the various special revenue fund sources. Chart 15—Special revenue Funds Sources FY 2018/ 19 Debt Proceeds 15% Tra nsfe rs I n 10% TUMFRevenue 3% Loca I Reimbursements 2% State Reimbursement 22% Measure Sales Tax 25% LTFSaIesTax 13% STASaIesTax 3% Federal Reimbursements 7% The Commission expendsspecial revenue funds' resourceson: • County highway, rail, regional arterial, and new corridors engineering, right of way acquisition, construction, and design -build; • Local streetsand roadsmaintenance, repair, and construction; • Economic development incentives; • Salestax bond financing; • Bicycle and pedestrian facilities; • Education and incentive programs to encourage use of alternate modes of transportation; • Special social service transportation programs; • Public transit operationsand capital needs; and • Motorist towing and freeway call box assistance. Asshown in Chart 16, projects and operationsexpenditures represent the primary use of special revenue fund resources. Chart 16 —Special Revenue Funds Uses FY 2018/ 19 Personnel Sa la ries and Benefits 1% Tra nsfe Out 15% Profe ssio n a l Se ry is e s 1% Projectsand Operations 83% Measure A Special Revenue Funds Measure A sales tax revenue, which is allocated to the three geographic areas of the County (Chart 17) primarily funds 16 of the special revenue funds. there are two 1989 Measure A and ten 2009 Measure A Western County funds, three 2009 Measure A Coachella Valley funds, and one 2009 Measure A Palo Verde Valley fund. Chart 17—Measure A Sales Tax Revenues by Geographic Area Coachella Valley 22% Palo V e rd e Valley 0% Western County 78% Since the 1989 Measure A terminated on June 30, 2009, the remaining 1989 Measure A Western County fundswill be closed upon the completion of the specific highway and rail projects. With the commencement of the 2009 Measure A on July 1, 2009, 14 fundswill be in existence for the 30-year term. These funds account for all Measure A project and program expenditures and transfersof debt service forcapital projects. The Measure A special revenue funds expend monies on capital construction and improvementsto highways, commuter rail, regional arterials, new corridors, and local streetsand roads. Funding is also reserved for commuter assistance, public and specialized transit, and economic development incentives programsaswell asbond financing costs. The Commission is a self-help county, and, as such on major highway projects, the Commission supplements the State's spending. Upon completion of most highway projects, Caltrans takes over the maintenance and operationsof the projects. The Commission pledged all Measure A salestax revenuesassecurity forthe Commission'ssenior salestax revenue bondsand subordinate commercial paper notes. Debt service on the bondsis recorded in the Sales Tax Bonds debt service fund, and Measure A special revenue funds provide most of the resourcesfordebt service through transfersout. Western County Measure A Funds The Western County Measure A special revenue funds account for Western County's approximately 78%share of the Measure A sales tax. As demonstrated in Table 23, most of the Commission's reimbursements flow through these funds, since the sales tax leverages state and federal dollars. Table 23—Westem County Measure A Funds FY2017 —2019 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources Measure A SalesTax Bond Financing $ 10,687,900 $ 11,242,500 $ 11,242,500 Commuter Assistance 1,979,200 2,081,900 2,081,900 Economic Development Incentives 1,583,400 1,665,600 1,665,600 Highways 40,376,300 42,471,700 42,471,700 Local Streetsand Roads 38,397,100 40,389,800 40,389,800 New Corridors 14,646,300 15,406,400 15,406,400 Public Bus Transit 2,018,800 2,123,600 2,123,600 Rail 8,075,300 8,494,300 8,494,300 Regional Arterials 11,875,400 12,491,700 12,491,700 Specialized Transit 3,364,700 3,539,300 3,539,300 Total Measure A 133,004,400 139,906,800 139,906,800 Federal Reimbursements 14,532,600 69,255,000 97,748,000 State Reimbursements 4,147,000 4,223,400 1,359,800 Local Reimbursements 3,521,100 1,434,500 3,260,000 Other Revenue 5,837,800 1,828,500 574,200 Investment Income 944,100 623,300 1,276,900 Transfers In 74,394,600 156,715,900 143,528,200 11RA Loan Proceeds 143,358,100 81,810,000 TOTAL Sources 379,739,700 455,797,400 387,653,900 Uses Personnel at lariesand Benefits 3,410,000 3,668,700 3,499,300 Professional Services 9,247,300 9,909,800 9,237,300 Support Costs 754,800 1,201,700 859,200 Projectsand Operations Program Operations 7,246,100 13,003,300 11,406,000 Engineering 1,110,200 4,140,000 3,081,000 Construction 33,037,500 59,715,700 37,257,700 Design Build 170,452,800 186,099,700 144,452,500 Right of Way/Land 25,505,900 76,811,200 30,695,900 Operating and Capital Disbursements 7,461,700 18,612,200 12,560,000 *ecialaudies 2,700 802,000 300,000 Local Streetsand Roads 37,533,500 40,007,100 40,007,100 TOTAL Projects and Operations 282,350,400 399,191,200 279,760,200 Capital Outlay 5,574,900 5,221,300 3,000,000 Tra n site rs O u t 58,614,000 114,551,100 110,477,500 TOTAL Uses 359,951,400 533,743,800 406,833,500 Excess(deficiency) of Sourcesover(under) Uses $ 19,788,300 $ (77,946,400) $ (19,179,600) $ 11,664,000 2,160,000 1,728,000 44,066,000 41,906,000 15,985,000 2,204,000 8,813,000 12,960,000 3,672,000 145,158,000 50,090,000 39,133,300 2,087,900 539,000 753,500 69,284,700 106,081,000 413,127,400 3,644,000 8,343,900 967,000 8,443,300 14,325,000 70,892,000 140,582,900 56,172,000 23,100,000 50,000 41,824,300 355,389,500 3,550,000 91,744,900 463,639,300 $ (50.511.900) $ 421,500 4% 78,100 4% 62,400 4% 1,594,300 4% 1,516,200 4% 578,600 4% 80,400 4% 318,700 4% 468,300 4% 132,700 4% 5,251,200 4% (19,165,000) -28% 34,909,900 827% 653,400 46% (1,289,500) -71% 130,200 21% (87,431,200) -56% 24,271,000 30% (42,670,000) -9% (24,700) -1% (1,565,900) -16% (234,700) -20% (4,560,000) -35% 10,185,000 246% 11,176,300 19% (45,516,800) -24% (20,639,200) -27% 4,487,800 24% (752,000) -94% 1,817,200 5% (43,801,700) -11% (1,671,300) -32% (22,806,200) -20% (70,104,500) -13% 27,434,500 -35% the budgeted Western County Measure A salestax revenues reflect a 4% increase compared to the prior year due to Measure A sales tax projections. Taxable sales changes between jurisdictions within the County also periodically affect the geographic allocation formula from yearto year. Federal reimbursements for highway and rail projects and the commuter assistance program are lower in the FY 2018/19 budget and relate primarily to funding from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ). The 28%decrease in federal reimbursements is primarily attributable to federal funding for activity on the 1-15 Express Lanes project, 71/91 connector project, and PVL and other rail related projects in the previous fiscal year. State reimbursements are higher by 827%compared to the FY2017/18 budget and reflect funding from STIP and Proposition 1Bfunding for various highway projects, particularly the SR60 truck climbing lanes, 1-15 Express Lanessouthem extension, and Pachappa underpass. The local reimbursement increase of 46% from the prior year is attributable to the commuter assistance program. Other revenue decreased 71%from the prior year primarily due to property management lease revenues. Investment income increased compared to the previousyear'sbudget due to higher investment yields. As in prior years, a significant portion of transfers in consistsof salestax revenue bonds proceeds of $45,044,500 to fund the 1-15 Express Lanes project and completion of the 91 Project. Other significant transfers in include: " $15,900,200 from the 2009 Measure A bond financing fund to fund a portion of Western County debt service; " $590,000 from the 1UMFregional arterial fund for the 1-15 Express Lanes project advance funding of I-15/Limonite interchange construction; " $6,000,000from the RCTC 91 Express Lanesfund forthe SR-91 corridor operations project; " Proposition 1Bfunding of $250,000 for the Riverside La Sierra station improvements; and " $1,500,000 from the 2009 Measure A Western County commuter assistance fund for a transit project. TIFIA loan proceedsof $106,081,000 will fund eligible 1-15 Express Lanesproject expenditures. Personnel salaries and benefits expenditures decrease 1%from the prior year resulting from the allocation of REs offset by an increase to the Commission's contribution to employee health benefitsand merit -based salary increases. Measure A Westem County professional services expenditures in FY 2018/19 consist of general legal services for the various programs and capital projects, specialized legal and financial advisory services related to the 1-15 Express Lanes project and completion of the 91 Project, and other professional services for rail capital and commuter assistance projects and the Commission's debt programs. The 16%decrease in FY 2018/19 reflects the prior year activity in legal and financial advisory services related to the 91 Project and 1-15 Express Lanes project. Support costs related to highway and rail projects and property management as well as the commuter assistance program decreased $234,700, or20%, from the prior year. General program operations comprise the program management with outside consultants for the highway and rail capital and commuter assistance programs, permits required for capital projects, and subsidies and certificates for the commuter assistance program. Such levels of operationstypically fluctuate as project activitiestransition to another phase. Many of the Commission's Western County rail and highway projects funded by Measure A have been in variousphasesof engineering, construction, design -build, and right of way activity. The Commission expects engineering and construction to increase 246%and 19%, respectively, due to the 1-15 Express Lanes, 1-15 Express Lanes southern expansion, 71/91 connector, SR60 truck climbing lanes, and Pachappa underpass projects. Design -build and right of way activities decreased 24%and 27%, respectively, compared to the prior year due to completion of the 91 Project. The 1-15 Express Lanes project is a major project in the design -build phase, while the 91 Project design -build activities concluded in FY 2017/18. Other design -build related activities during FY 2018/19 include utility and railroad relocations and the interagency and other consultant staff to support the 1-15 Express Lanes project. Right of way acquisition, another major project activity, can be a lengthy process. Right of way acquisition activity will benefit the 1-15 Express Lanes project, 71/91 connector project, and Mid County Parkway and the closeout of the 91 Project. Operating and capital disbursements increased 24%compared to the FY2017/18 budget and relate to Western County intercity bus service, specialized transit expenditures, and rail capital funded by Measure A. Special studies decreased 94% compared to the prior year due to feasibility studies performed in the prior year. Local streets and roads, or turn back paymentsto local jurisdictions and the County, increased because of higher Measure A sales tax revenues. Capital outlay includes equipment and improvements for the rail program and reflects a 32% decrease due to station rehabilitation and improvements in the priorfiscal year. Significant transfersout from the Western County Measure A funds include: " Funding for debt service paymentsof $82,955,700; " $250,000 from the 2009 Measure A Western County rail fund for station rehabilitation costs; " $1,500,000 from the 2009 Measure A Western County commuter assistance fund for a transit project; " $3,000,000 loan from the 2009 Measure A Western County highways fund to establish the 1-15 ExpressLanesproject 11RA reserve; and " $4,039,200forthe administrative costsallocation. Coachella Valley Measure A Funds These special revenue funds account for Coachella Valley's 22% share of the Measure A sales tax (Table 24). Table 24-Coachella Valley Measure A Funds FY 2017 -2019 FY 16/ 17 FY 17/ 18 FY 17/ 18 FY 18/ 19 Dollar Pe rc e n t Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change SDurces Measure A Sales Tax Highways& Regional Arterials Local Streetsand Roads Specialized Transit Total Measure A Investment Income Transfers In TOTAL Sources $ 19,027,200 $ 20,014,600 $ 20,014,600 13, 319,000 14,010,200 14,010,200 5,708,100 6,004,400 6,004,400 38,054,300 40,029,200 40,029,200 184,800 112,300 303,600 167,200 188,000 - 38,406,300 40,329,500 40,332,800 Uses PersonnelSalariesand Benefits 1,200 200 Professional Services 9,100 7,400 48,500 Sipport Costs 100 200 200 Projectsand Operations Program Operations 13,900 900 Operating and Capital Disbursements 5,835,700 5,153,400 5,153,400 Local Streetsand Roads 13,319,000 13,976,500 13,976,500 Regional Arterials 14,080,400 30,416,000 20,000,000 TOTAL Projectsand Operations 33,249,000 49,546,800 39,129,900 Transfers Out - 399,400 124,800 TOTAL Uses 33,259,400 49,953,800 39,303,600 Excess(deficiency) of Sourcesover(under) Uses $ 5,146,900 $ (9,624,300) $ 1,029,200 $ 20,425,000 14,297,000 6,127,000 40,849,000 198,300 41,047,300 5,100 49,300 200 5,500,000 14,215,300 30,000,000 49,715,300 245,800 50,015,700 $ (8,968,400) $ 410,400 2% 286,800 2 122,600 2 819,800 2 86,000 77 (188,000) -100% 717,800 2 5,100 N/A 41,900 566% 0% (900) -100 346,600 7 238,800 2 (416,000) -1 168,500 0 (153,600) -38% 61,900 0% 655,900 -7% Coachella Valley Measure A sales tax revenues increased 2%. Although total Measure A sales tax revenues increased 3�4 taxable sales changes among the geographic areas also impact the geographic allocation formula from yearto year. The Coachella Valley operating and capital disbursements represent specialized transit funds distributed to ainLine Transit Agency (am Line) for transit operations. Local streets and roads payments to local jurisdictions are directly affected by changes in Measure A sales tax revenues. Regional arterial projects are highway and regional arterial projects managed by CVAG. The Commission accounts for debt service funding related to CVAG highway and regional arterial and the city of Indio local streets and roads projects, under advance funding agreements, in projects and operations in order to be consistent with the accounting in the ERP syste m . Transfersout of $245,800 relate to the administrative costs allocation. Palo Verde Valley Measure A Fund This special revenue fund accounts for Palo Verde Valley's share of the Measure A sales tax (Table 25). Table 25—Palo Verde Valley Measure A Fund FY2017-2019 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources Measure A SalesTax Local Streetsand Roads $ 1,011,500 $ 1,064,000 $ 1,064,000 $ 993,000 $ (71,000) -7% Uses Local Streetsand Roads 1,011,500 1,053,900 1,053,900 911,900 (142,000) -13% TOTAL Projects and Operations 1,011,500 1,053,900 1,053,900 911,900 (142,000) -13% TransfersOut 10,100 10,100 81,100 71,000 703% TOTAL Us 1,011,500 1,064,000 1,064,000 993,000 (71,000) -7% Excess(deficiency) of SDurcesover(under) Uses $ - $ $ - $ $ N/A Although total Measure A sales tax revenues increased 3%, taxable sales changes among the geographic areasalso impact the geographic allocation formula from yearto year. Local streets and roads represent the only expenditures in the Palo Verde Valley. the Commission accounts for debt service funding for the city of Blythe local streets and roads projects, under an advance funding agreement, in projects and operations in order to be consistent with the accounting in the ERP system. Transfers out of $81,100 relate to the administrative costsallocation. Non -Measure A Special Revenue Funds The non -Measure A special revenue funds account for LTFdisbursements; TUMFWestem County project costs; motorist assistance expendituresfortowing service aswell asfreeway call box and 1E511 system operations; transit disbursements from STA and SGRfunding; Coachella Valley rail planning and development; interagency project activities; and SB 132 project activities. These activitiesare budgeted in the LTF, TUMF, FSP, SAFE, STA, SGRCoachella Valley Rail, Other Agency Projects, and SB 132 special revenue funds, respectively. Local Transportation Fund The LTF special revenue fund derives its revenue from one quarter of one cent of the state sales tax that is returned to source and providesfor funding of public transit operations in the County, bicycle and pedestrian facility projects, planning, and administration (Table 26). Table 26—Local Transportation Fund FY2017-2019 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources L1FSalesTax $ 88,206,900 $ 91,000,000 $ 91,000,000 94,000,000 $ 3,000,000 3% Investment Income 322,500 435,300 492,600 375,600 (59,700) -14% TOTAL Sources 88,529,400 91,435,300 91,492,600 94,375,600 2,940,300 3% Uses Operating and Ca pita! Disbursements 68,543,600 87,965,000 80,266,100 93,903,000 5,938,000 7% TransfersOut 21,627,300 24,233,300 24,125,600 27,251,600 3,018,300 12% TOTAL Uses 90,170,900 112,198,300 104,391,700 121,154,600 8,956,300 8% Excess(deficiency) of Sourcesover(under) Uses $ (1,641,500) $ (20,763,000) $ (12,899,100) $ (26,779,000) $ (6,016,000) 29% The Commission projects LTFsales tax revenue in FY2018/19to increase 3% from the prior year. Investment income decreased due to lower cash and investment balances. In FY 2018/19, approximately 97% and Woof the L1F transit expenditures of $84,900,000 are for operating and capital purposes, respectively. L1F operating allocations, subject to approval in July 2018, are comprised of 73%to Western County, 25%to Coachella Valley, and 2%to Palo Verde Valley public bus operators. Other operating and capital disbursements include allocations for S3 821 bicycle and pedestrian projects of $8,286,000 and planning and administration allocationsof $717,000to the County Aud itor-Controller and SCAG. Transfers out include allocations to the Commission's General fund for planning and administration of $2,820,000; rail operations of $21,200,000; grade separation projects of $2,000,000; $1,149,900 for planning, programming, and agency share of the administrative costs; and $81,700 for ad ministrative costsallocation. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Fund the 1UMF fund accounts for the Commission's share of developer fee awmssments on new residential and commercial developments in Western County for regional arterials and Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process(CETAP) corridors(Table 27). 1UMF revenues includes$21,000,000 based on projected feesdistributed to the Commission and $1,922,200 related to WRCOG's 1UMF Zone reimbursements for a Lake Elsinore regional arterial project managed by the Commission. Federal reimbursements of $237,000 relate to the Lake Elsinore regional arterial project. the FY2018/19 transfers in of $300,000 relate to funding for the SR79 realignment project from the 2009 Measure A Western County Highways special revenue fund. Table 27-Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Fund FY2017-2019 FY 16/ 17 FY 17/ 18 Actual Revised Budget FY 17/ 18 FY 18/ 19 Projected Budget Dollar Percent Change Change Sources Federal Reimbursements 1UMF Revenue Other Revenue Investment Income Transfers In TOTAL Sources Uses PersonnelSalariesand Benefits Professional Services amport Coss Projects and Operations Program Operations Engineering Construction Right of Way/Land Regional Arterials TOTAL Projects and Operations TransfersOut TOTAL Uses Excess(deficiency) of Sourcesover(under) Uses - $ - $ 19,594,800 22,250,000 22,250,000 10,200 301,200 390,600 521,600 450,900 435,000 135,000 20,357,100 23,075,600 22,906,600 265,600 290,400 811,200 439,700 19,400 9,300 333,800 274,800 2,057,500 4,624,500 2,552,900 7,386,700 1,787,100 11, 036, 300 516,600 281,900 345,400 7,500 287,700 3,509,100 2,293,400 6,100,000 7,247,900 1,156,100 23, 322, 300 12,190,200 1,119,000 1,709,000 9,500,200 25,180,700 14,534,000 $ 10,856,900 $ (2,105,100) $ 8,372,600 $ 237,500 22,922,200 414,400 300,000 23,874,100 271,500 455,100 13,000 316,100 6,738,800 5,286,000 15,793,600 28,134,500 1,562, 000 30,436,100 $ (6,562,000) $ 237,500 672,200 N/A 3% N/A 23,800 6% (135,000) -31% 798,500 3% (18,900) 15,400 3,700 40% -7 % 4% 41,300 15% 2,114,300 46% (2,100,700) -28% 4,757,300 43% N/A 4,812,200 21% 443,000 40% 5,255,400 21% (4,456,900) 212% Personnel salaries and benefits reflect a net decrease of 7%due to allocation of FTEs, offset by an increase to the Commission's contribution to employee health benefits and merit -based salary increases. Professional services increases relate to legal services for the Lake Elsinore regional arterial project, while support costs increases relate to property maintenance on the Mid County Parkway project. Projects and operations costs increased 21%, as many regional arterial projects move through various stages of engineering, right of way acquisition, and construction. Approximately 71%of the projects and operations costsare attributable to programmed regional arterial projects. the remaining 29% relates to CETAP projects such as the Mid County Parkway preliminary engineering and right of way acquisitions. Transfers out represent $590,000 to the 2009 Measure A Western County highways fund for the I- 15 Express Lanes project and $972,000 to the General fund related to the administrative cost allocation. Freeway Service Patrol Fund the FSPfund accountsfor the state and local resources provided to cover the costsof servicing stranded motorists in covered service areas and construction zones by means of towing, changing tires, and providing fuel (Table 28). lhe State's funding share of $2,909,000 increased 32% from the FY 2017/18 budget due to increased California Highway Patrol (CHP) support needed for highway construction projects. Local reimbursements of $225,300 relate to weekend FS' services on SR60. Transfers in represent Commission match fundsof $3,600,000 from the SAFEspecial revenue fund. Table 28 -Freeway Service Patrol Fund FY 2017 - 2019 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements Other Revenue Investment Income Transfers In TOTAL Sources $ 1,788,700 $ 2,200,000 $ 1,613,100 675,000 624,000 675,000 3,100 4,900 714,700 1,083,600 1,083,600 3,130,500 3,958,600 3,376,600 Uses Personnel Salarlesand Benefits 83,800 133,700 135,800 Professional rvices 33,600 48,000 32,000 SLpport Costs 26,200 53,100 44,900 Projectsand Operations Program Operations 3,216,500 3,700,000 3,250,000 Tra nsfe rs O ut 173,000 112,900 112,900 TOTAL Uses 3,533,100 4,047,700 3,575,600 Excess(deficiency) of Sourcesover(under) Uses $ (402,600) $ (89,100) $ (199,000) $ 2,909,000 225,300 9,500 3,600,000 6,743,800 154,400 48,000 53,600 5,155,700 146,400 5,558,100 $ 1,185,700 $ 709,000 32 % 225,300 N/A (675,000) -100 % 9,500 N/A 2,516,400 232 % 2,785,200 70% 20,700 15 % 0% 500 1% 1,455,700 39°% 33,500 30 % 1,510,400 37°% $ 1,274,800 -1431% Personnel salaries and benefits increased 15% due to the allocation of 1-1Es, the Commission's contribution to employee health benefits, and merit -based salary increases. Professional services and support costs are comparable to the prior year's budget. Operating costs for towing services in FY 2018/19 are higher than the FY 2017/18 budget due to increased support levels needed on the 1-15 Express Lanes, Pachappa underpass, and SR60 truck climbing lane projects. Transfersout to the General fund of $146,400 are administrative cost allocations. Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies Fund the SAFE fund accounts for the $1 per vehicle registration fee levied by the State on all registered vehicleswithin the County. It fundsthe installation and implementation of emergency aid call boxes located strategically on the highways throughout the County as well as the operationsof the 1E511 system (Table 29). Table 29-Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies Fund FY2017-2019 FY 16/17 Actual FY 17/ 18 FY 17/ 18 Revised Budget Projected FY18/19 Dollar Budget Change Percent Change Sources State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements Other Revenue Investment Income TOTAL Sources Uses Personnel Salariesand Benefits Professional Services Sapport Costs Projectsand Operations Program Operations Tra nde rs Out TOTAL Uses $ 1,988,000 206,300 11,300 29,200 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,324,600 229,600 216,100 7,000 39,100 36,000 2,234,800 2,075,700 1,576,700 42,100 20,300 372,000 470,000 362,400 245,800 40,600 23,000 895,400 1,144,600 1,712,500 1,903,700 17,200 428,200 110,100 4,000 1,144,600 1,704,100 Excess(deficiency) of Sourcesover(under) Uses $ 522,300 $ 172,000 $ (127,400) $ 1,800,000 231,600 26,900 2,058,500 45,600 480,200 236,400 12,000 3,674,100 4,448,300 $ (2,389,800) 0% 2,000 1 % (7,000) -100% (12,200) -31 % (17,200) -1°% 25,300 10,200 (9,400) 125% 2% -4 % (11,000) -48% 2,529,500 221% 2,544,600 134 % $ (2,561,800) -1489% Local reimbursements represent recoveries through a collection agency related to call box knockdownsand pass -through fundsfrom S3CTA for itsshare of the 1E511 system operating costs. Investment income is lower in FY2018/19due to lower cash and investment balances. Personnel salaries and benefits increased 125%due to the allocation of FTEs, the Commission's contribution to employee health benefits, and merit -based salary increases. Professional services increased 2%due to SUEstrategic aocossment long-term planning. Support costsdecreased 4% due to a reduction in printing services and event support. Projects and operations costs decreased 48%based on a reduction in call box coordination. the transfers out reflect a $3,600,000 match to the Rate's contribution for towing services in the FSPspecial revenue fund and $74,100 to the General fund for administrative cost allocations. State Transit Assistance Fund the STA fund accountsfor the state budgetary allocation of gastax revenuesdesignated for rail and bus transit operations and capital requirements (Table 30). Estimates of diesel fuel salestax revenues provided by the State Controller, subject to an annual state budget appropriation, serve asthe basisforthe allocation. Table 30 -State Transit Assistance Fund FY 2017 - 2019 FY 16/ 17 Actual FY 17/ 18 FY 17/ 18 Revised Budget Projected FY18/19 Dollar Budget Change Percent Change Sources STA Sa le s Ta x Investment Income TOTAL Sources Uses Professional rvices Operating and Capital Disbursements TOTAL Projectsand Operations Transfers Out TOTAL Uses Excess(deficiency) of Sources over (under) Uses $ 6,432,600 $ 10,469,000 $ 16,507,600 285,300 327,900 489,500 6,717,900 10,796,900 16,300 2,695,000 21,320,000 16, 997,100 16,800 8,120,000 2,695,000 21,320,000 8,120,000 159,400 272,900 312,900 2,854,400 21,609,200 8,449,700 $ 3,863,500 $ (10,812,300) $ 8,547,400 $ 19,506,600 271,200 19,777,800 18,000 48,800,000 48,800,000 431,700 49,249,700 $ (29,471,900) $ 9,037,600 86 % (56,700) -17% 8,980,900 83 % 1,700 10% 27,480,000 129 % 27,480,000 129 % 158,800 58 % 27,640,500 128 % (18,659,600) 173% Investment income islower due to decreased cash and investment balances. lhe operating and capital disbursements consist of allocations for bus capital purposes. In FY 2018/19, approximately 66%of the allocations are in Western County, 34%in Coachella Valley, and less than 1%in Palo Verde Valley. Transfers out represent rail capital allocations of $350,000 to the Coachella Valley Rail fund and $81,700 to the General fund for administrative cost allocations. Smilarto the LlFallocations, the STA allocationsare subject to Commission approval in July 2018. State of Good Repair Fund the State of Good Repair fund accounts for funding under S3 1 (the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017), which provides additional STA revenues for transit infrastructure repair and service improvements (Table 31). These additional STA revenues fund eligible transit maintenance, rehabilitation, and capital projects. Table 31 -State of Good Repair Fund FY2017 - 2019 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources STA SalesTax Uses Operating and Capital Disbursements TransfersOut TOTAL Use s Excess(deficiency) of Sourcesover(under) Uses - $ 3,697,200 3,697,200 3,697,200 $ 3,697,000 3,615,300 81,700 3,697,000 $ 3,697,000 N/A 3,615,300 N/A 81,700 N/A 3,697,000 N/A $ N/A The capital disbursements consist of allocations for bus capital purposes. In FY 2018/19, 57% of the allocations are in Westem County, 21% in Coachella Valley, less than 1% in Palo Verde Valley, and 21%for rail. Similar to the LTF and STA allocations, Commission approval of the SGR allocations occurs in July 2018. Transfers out of $81,700 to the General fund represent administrative costsallocations. Coachella Valley Rail Fund The Coachella Valley Rail fund accountsfor state funding for the planning and development of the new Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Passcorridor rail service (Table 32). Table 32-Coachella Valley Dail Fund FY2017-2019 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources Federal Reimbursements $ 529,200 $ 2,400,000 $ 1,000,000 Investment Income 14,300 17,000 Transfers In 159,400 322,400 322,400 TOTAL Sources 702,900 2,722,400 1,339,400 Uses Personnel alariesand Benefits 29,400 25,600 22,600 Professional Services 875,100 3,235,000 1,610,000 Support Costs 4,000 1,300 Projects and Operations Engineering 250,000 200,000 Construction 2,200,000 TOTAL Projectsa nd Operations 2,450,000 200,000 Tra n sfe rs Out 165,000 165,000 TOTAL Uses 904,500 5,879,600 1,998,900 Excess(deficiency) of Sourcesover(under) Uses $ (201,600) $ (3,157,200) $ (659,500) $ 2,000,000 200 350,000 2,350,200 50,700 2,210,000 4,000 2,400,000 2,400,000 300,600 4,965,300 $ (2,615,100) $ (400,000) -17% 200 N/A 27,600 9% (372,200) -14 % 25,100 98% (1,025,000) -32 % 0% (250,000) -100% 200,000 9 % (50,000) -2°% 135,600 82% (914,300) -16% $ 542,100 -17°% Federal reimbursements represent a Federal Rail Administration (FRA) grant of $2,000,000 for rail station planning and development. Transfers in of $350,000 reflect STA allocations. Personnel salaries and benefits increased 98% due to the allocation of FTEs, the Commission's contribution to employee health benefits, and merit -based salary increases. Professional services decreased 32% due to feasibility studies in the previous fiscal year. Projects and operations remained unchanged from the prior year. These expenditures represent exploring paoscngerrail options, conducting detailed studies, and station construction planning and development on the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass rail corridor. Transfers out to the General fund of $300,600 relate to administrative costsallocation. Other Agency Projects Fund the Other Agency Projects fund accounts for interagency cooperative planning and development of projects in the County (Table 33). The Commission entered into a MOU with the District for the Santa Ana River Trail projects. The projects are a joint effort with several public and private agencies including the counties of Orange and San Bernardino. The District is the lead agency for environmental compliance for NPA and CEQA, and the Commission is responsible for project oversight and approval, final design, and construction. Table 33-Other Agency Projects Fund FY2017-2019 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources Local Reimbursements $ - $ 4,001,000 $ 1,049,400 Investment Income 1,600 1,000 800 TransfersIn 208,000 208,000 TOTAL Sources 1,600 4,210,000 1,258,200 Uses Personnel Sala riesand Benefits 54,200 112,800 104,100 Professional rvices 1,600 35,500 47,900 &wort Costs 1,300 100 600 Projects and Operations Program Operations 124,400 243,000 243,000 Engineering 993,400 650,000 Construction 2,788,500 Rght of Way/Land 50,800 265,000 140,000 TOTAL Projects a nd Operations 175,200 4,289,900 1,033,000 TranlersOut - 208,000 208,000 TOTAL Uses 232,300 4,646,300 1,393,600 Excess (deficiency) of Sourcesover(under) Uses $ (230,700) $ (436,300) $ (135,400) $ 11,880,000 200 466,600 12,346,800 123,600 51,000 600 271,800 970,000 10,208,000 255,000 11,704,800 466,600 12,346,600 $ 200 $ 7,879,000 197 (800) -80% 258,600 124 8,136,800 193 10,800 10°/ 15,500 44 500 500 28,800 12 (23,400) -2°/ 7,419,500 266 (10,000) -4% 7,414,900 173 258,600 124 7,700,300 166% $ 436,500 -100 The District is responsible for 100%of the Santa Ana River Trail project costs. It will reimburse the Commission, including providing an advance deposit, for all salaries and benefits, project management, engineering, and construction costs. SB 132 Fund The SB 132 fund (Table 34) accounts for the $427 million appropriation from the state highway account to the Riverside County Transportation Efficiency Corridor for five major projects in Western County: • Commission's15/91 ExpressLanesconnector project; • City of Corona's Mci nley Avenue grade separation project; • County's Jurupa Road grade separation project with the city of Jurupa Valley as its partner; • County's1-15/Limonite interchange project with the cities of Eastvale and Jurupa Valley asitspartners; and • County'sHamner Bridge widening project with the city of Norco asitspartner. Without the state funding approved by the Governor and State Legislators in April 2017 as part package of legislation that pascod with SB 1, these projectswould not have been built for many years. Table 34—SB132 Fund FY2017-2019 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources Rate Reimbursements $ - $ 5,000,000 $ 2,416,400 Uses PersonnelSala rlesand Benefits 16,900 145,000 340,000 Professional R rvices 6,200 350,000 280,500 Ripport Costs 10,000 3,000 Projectsand Operations Program Operations 70,000 50,400 Engineering 525,000 Construction 131,000 Design Build 6,500,000 1,000,000 Right of Way/Land TOTAL Projectsand Operations 6,570,000 1,706,400 Tra n sfe rs Out 63,400 TOTAL Uses 23,100 7,075,000 2,393,300 Excess(deficiency) of Sourcesover(under) Uses $ (23,100) $ (2,075,000) $ 23,100 $ 118,418,400 387,200 1,495,000 10,000 226,300 12,050,000 35,772,000 47,982,600 20,000,000 116,030,900 495,300 118,418,400 $ 113,418,400 2268 % 242,200 167 % 1,145,000 327% 0% 156,300 223 % 12,050,000 N/A 35,772,000 N/A 41,482,600 638% 20,000,000 N/A 109,460,900 1666 % 495,300 N/A 111,343,400 1574 % $ 2,075,000 -100% Personnel salaries and benefits increased 167/0 due to the allocation of FTEs, the Commission's contribution to employee health benefits, and merit -based salary increases. Professional services increased 327%due to legal services, financial advisory, and traffic and revenue study activities primarily related to the 15/91 Express Lanesconnector project. aipport costsare comparable to the prior year's budget. Projects and operations have increased $109,460,900 primarily due to design -build activities on the 15/91 Express Lanes connector project; engineering and right of way activities on the McKinley Avenue grade separation project; and construction on the I- 15/Limonite interchange project. Transfers out to the General fund of $495,300 relate to the administrative costsallocation. Capital Projects Funds Overview lhe capital projects funds account for all debt proceeds from commercial paper notes, sales tax revenue bonds, and toll revenue bonds(Table 35). Table 35- Capital Projects Funds FY 2017 —2019 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources Investment Income TOTAL Revenues $ 2,394,800 $ 2,394,800 1,134,500 $ 1,134, 500 3,267,500 $ 955,400 $ (179,100) -16% 3,267,500 955,400 (179,100) -16% Expenditures Professional Services 10,292,000 1,410,000 952,000 (1,410,000) -100% &ipport Costs 2,300 N/A TOTAL Professional andSupport Costs 10,292,000 1,410,000 954,300 - (1,410,000) -100% Debt rvice Principal Payments 20,000,000 30,000,000 30,000,000 (30,000,000) -100% Interest Payments 86,600 7,615,500 7,563,500 (7,615,500) -100% Cost of Issuance 654,000 3,767,200 2,257,100 - (3,767,200) -100% TOTAL Debt Service 20,740,600 41,382,700 39,820,600 (41,382,700) -100% Capital Outlay - - - - N/A TOTAL Expenditures 31,032,600 42,792,700 40,774,900 - (42,792,700) -100% Excess(deficiency) of Revenuesover (under) Expenditures (28,637,800) (41,658,200) (37,507,400) 955,400 42,613,600 -102% Other Rna ncing Sources(Uses) TransfersIn 52,040,800 36,100,000 38,917,000 - (36,100,000) -100% TransfersOut (97,744,100) (163,109,000) (155,012,700) (45,044,500) 118,064,500 -72% Debt Proceeds 106,140,000 636,250,000 632,775,000 (636,250,000) -100% Payment to Escrow Agent (63,900,000) (546,300,000) (538,055,700) 546,300,000 -100% Bond Premium 8,414,000 119,722,000 119,713,800 - (119,722,000) -100% Net Financing Sources(Uses) 4,950,700 82,663,000 98,337,400 (45,044,500) (127,707,500) -154% Excess (deficiency) of Revenuesover (under) Expend ituresand Other Ana ncing Sources (Uses) (23,687,100) 41,004,800 60,830,000 (44,089,100) (85,093,900) -208% Beginning Fund Balance 135,299,100 111,612,000 111,612,000 172,442,000 60,830,000 55% ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 111,612,000 $ 152,616,800 $ 172,442,000 $ 128,352,900 $ (24,263,900) -16% As illustrated in the following charts for FY 2018/19, capital projects funds sources and uses consist of investment income (Chart 18) and transfers out (Chart 19), respectively- In prior years, these charts reflected debt proceeds, including bond premium, and transfers in for sources as well as debt service payments to escrow agent for uses. In FY 2017/18, the Commission issued sales tax revenue bonds to finance the 1-15 Express Lanes project and 91 Project completion and to refund sales tax revenue bonds due to federal tax reform. The Commission does not anticipate any new sales tax revenue debt issuances, toll revenue debt issuances, or debt refundingsin FY2018/19. Chart 18—Capital Projects Funds SourcesFY2018/19 Chart 19 —Capital Projects Funds Uses FY 2018/ 19 Investment Income 100% TrandersOut 100% In FY2018/19, the Commission expectsto transfer out salestax bond proceedsof $45,044,500 to the 2009 Measure A Western County Highways special revenue fund for the 1-15 Express Lanes project and 91 Project completion. Debt Service Fund Overview Under the 2009 Measure A program, as amended by Measure K in November 2010, the Commission has the authority to issue sales tax revenue bonds subject to a debt limitation of $975,000,000. The Debt Service fund of the Commission primarily accounts for all activities related to the sales tax revenue bonds debt incurred by the Commission (Table 36). In FY 2016/17, the Commission transferred the Toll Bonds debt service fund to the RCTC 91 Express Lanes enterprise fund upon substantial completion of the 91 Project and opening of the RCTC 91 Express La n e s. The Commission's largest single expenditure is debt service. The debt agreements require the trustees to hold all debt proceeds, a portion of the sales tax revenues intercepted from the CDTFA, and the toll revenues from express lanes operations and to segregate all funds into separate accounts. These monies are included in the restricted investments held by trustee in the capital projects funds, debt service fund, and enterprise fund. Under the sales tax indentures, the Commission may use sales tax revenues for any lawful purpose related to the Riverside County TIP after the trustee has satisfied debt service requirements. Under the toll indentures, which include the TIFIA loans, a separate flow of funds administered by the trustee prescribesthe use of toll revenuesfor each facility. In order to advance project development activities, the Commission established a commercial paper program in 2005. Periodically the Commission issued commercial paper notesand retired some of the noteswith proceedsfrom salestax revenue bonds. Table 36—Debt Service Fund FY2017-2019 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sources Federal Reimbursements $ 2,776,300 $ 2,746,500 $ 2,791,300 $ 2,800,200 $ 53,700 2% Investment Income (72,400) 206,600 571,000 162,900 (43,700) -21% TOTALSources 2,703,900 2,953,100 3,362,300 2,963,100 10,000 0% Expenditures Debt Service Principal Payments Interest Payments TOTAL Debt Service TOTALExpenditures Excess(deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures 7,300,000 44,590,000 51,890,000 51,890,000 32,145,000 39,977,200 72,122,200 72,122,200 32,120,000 40,029,200 72,149,200 72,149,200 25,965,000 43,590,700 69,555,700 69,555,700 (6,180,000) -19% 3,613,500 9% (2,566,500) -4% (2,566,500) -4% (49,186,100) (69,169,100) (68,786,900) (66,592,600) 2,576,500 -4% Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In 21,241,600 73,960,000 72,149,200 72,555,700 (1,404,300) -2% TransfersOut (28,389,100) (2,746,500) (2,791,300) (2,800,200) (53,700) 2% Payment to Escrow Agent (3,834,200) Net Financing Sources (Uses) (7,147,500) 71,213,500 65,523,700 69,755,500 (1,458,000) -2% Excess(deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expend ituresand Other Financing Sources (Uses) (56,333,600) 2,044,400 (3,263,200) 3,162,900 1,118,500 55% Beginning Fund Balance ENDING FUND BALANCE 78,316,100 21,982,500 21,982,500 18,719,300 (3,263,200) -15% $ 21,982,500 $ 24,026,900 $ 18,719,300 $ 21,882,200 $ (2,144,700) -9% Reimbursements consist of federal cash subsidy payments related to the 2010 Series B Bonds (2010B Bonds) designated as Build America Bonds (BABs). The BABs subsidy payments reflect a reduction in the expected payments due to federal sequestration cuts. Investment income is slightly higher than the previous fiscal year due to improved investment yields. Transfers in represent the primary source of funding for the debt service funds and reserves(Chart 20) and consist of fundsfrom the 2009 Measure A Western County Highwaysand Bond Financing special revenue funds. Chart 20— Debt Service Fund Sources FY 2018/19 Federal Reimbursements 4% Tra nsfe rs I n 96% Debt Service fund uses (Chart 21) consist of debt service on the sales tax revenue bonds and transfer of the BABs subsidy payments to the 2009 Measure A Western County highways and 2009 Measure A Coachella Valley highway and regional arterialsfunds. Chart21 —Debt Service Fund Uses FY 2018/19 TransfersOut 3% Debt Service 96% Enterprise Fund Overview The RCTC 91 Express Lanes is a four -lane, eight -mile toll road in the median of SR-91 that extends the OCTA 91 Express Lanes at the Orange County/Riverside County line to the SR91/1-15 interchange. Toll revenues and non -toll revenues fund maintenance and operating costs, rehabilitation, capital expenses, and debt service (Table 37). The RCTC 91 Express Lanes toll collection system is all electronic transactions, with no toll collection booths. Commuters on SR- 91 in Corona have a choice of using either the expresslanesor the general purpose lanes. Table 37—Enterprise Fund FY2017-2019 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Revenues Local Reimbursements $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 8,500,000 $ 8,500,000 N/A Tolls, Penalties, and Fees 10,125,300 16,835,800 42,812,600 36,940,500 20,104,700 119% Investment Income 12,100 162,400 514,600 141,300 (21,100) -13% TOTAL Revenues 10,137,400 16,998,200 44,827,200 45,581,800 28,583,600 168% Expenses Personnel Sa la riesand Benefits 148,700 745,100 644,600 603,000 (142,100) -19% Professional and Sip port Professional Services 99,500 1,436,100 1,200,200 2,061,000 624,900 44% 9.4port Costs 897,600 4,228,500 3,374,300 4,576,700 348,200 8% TOTAL Professional and &wort Costs 997,100 5,664,600 4,574,500 6,637,700 973,100 17% Program and Operations Program and Operations 1,893,900 7,984,500 6,711,200 8,786,100 801,600 10% Debt Service Interest Payments 2,021,200 7,119,900 7,119,900 7,119,900 0% Capital Outlay 650,000 921,000 1,340,000 690,000 106% TOTAL Expenses 5,060,900 22,164,100 19,971,200 24,486,700 2,322,600 10% Excess(deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenses 5,076,500 (5,165,900) 24,856,000 21,095,100 26,261,000 -508% Other Financing SaUrces(Uses) Transfers In 5,775,000 3,560,000 - - (3,560,000) -100% TransfersOut (1,392,200) (4,052,900) (709,900) (6,307,200) (2,254,300) 56% Payment to Escrow Agent (20,000,000) (20,000,000) N/A Net Financing Sources(Uses) 4,382,800 (492,900) (709,900) (26,307,200) (25,814,300) 5237% Excess(deficiency) of Revenuesover(under) Expenses and Other Financing Sources(Uses) Beginning Fund Balance 9,459,300 (5,658,800) 24,146,100 (5,212,100) 446,700 -8% 9,459,300 9,459,300 33,605,400 24,146,100 255% ENDING FUND BALANCE $ 9,459,300 $ 3,800,500 $ 33,605,400 $ 28,393,300 $ 24,592,800 647% Local reimbursements of $8,500,000 representsthe anticipated proceedsfrom the sale of excess properties secured during the construction of the 91 Project. The Commission intends to use these sale proceeds to fund a $20,000,000 reserve required under the 11FIA Loan executed in July 2013 for the 91 Project (2013 T1FIA Loan). Tolls, penalties, and fees revenues represent the primary revenue source for the enterprise fund (Chart 22). Such revenuesconsist of toll revenues of $31,681,800 based on estimated toll transactions and current RCTC 91 Express Lanes traffic and revenue data, while the balance of $5,258,700 represents penalties and fees related to toll transactions and other customer account fees. Investment income represents earnings on operating and other restricted funds. Chart 22 — Enterprise Fund Sources FY 2018/ 19 Local Reimbursements 19% Tolls, Penalties, and Fees 81% Toll operations expenses in FY2018/19 are necexary to manage the operations, maintenance, and capital support of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes (Chart 23). Personnel salaries and benefits represent 1%of the total budgeted uses. Professional and support costs is 13%of budgeted uses and includes system, equipment, and road maintenance; insurance; violation enforcement; consulting services; and marketing. Program and operations of $8,786,100 consist of the contracted operator's expenses related to operating and maintaining the toll lane hardware and software and customer service center, toll processing, and violation collection processing. Debt service includes interest payments of $7,119,900 for the current interest portion of the 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds (2013 Toll Bonds). The FY2018/19 budget does not include accreted interest related to the capital appreciation portion of the 2013 Toll Bonds or compounded interest on the 201311FIA Loan. Chart 23—Enterprise Fund Uses FY 2018/ 19 Personnel Salaries and Benefits 1% I Tra nsfe rs O ut 13% Professional and S.apport 13% CapitalOutlay 3% Program a n d Operations 17% Transfers out include $6,000,000 of surplus toll revenues to the 2009 Measure A Western County highways fund for the SR91 Corridor Operations project and a traffic and revenue study and $307,200 to the General fund for the administrative costs allocation. The payment to escrow agent of $20,000,000 representsthe required funding for the 2013 TIFIA Loan reserve. Revenues and Other Sources Total revenuesand other sourcesare budgeted at $904,579,600, and consist of: • Measure A salestax of $187,000,000 (21%of total sources); • LlFsalestax of $94,000,000 (10%of total sources); • STA revenuesof $23,203,600 (3%of total sources); • Federal revenuesof $59,105,700 (7%of total sources); • State revenues, including vehicle registration fees, of $165,442,400 (18%of total sources); • TUMFof $22,922,200 (2%of total sources); • Debt proceedsof $106,081,000 (12%of total sources); • Transfers in of $181,899,300 (20%of total sources); • Toll revenues, penalties, and feesof $36,940,500 (4%of total sources); and • Other revenuesof $27,984,900 (3%of total sources). Table 38 summarizesthe specific revenue funding sources. Table 38—Ievenuesand Other Sources FY 2018/19 Department/Program Sales Tax Measure A LTF STA Federal Sate Local/Toll/Other Funding Sources Management cervices $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 19,400 MEASIREA AND OTHER CAPITAL PROGRAMS Bond Rnancing 11,664,000 20,600 CETAP - - - - - 10,758,500 Economic Development 1,728,000 - - 52,800 Highways 64,491,000 - - 28,232,800 157,551,700 1,781,500 Local Sreetsand Roads 57,196,000 New Corridors 15,985,000 - - - - 180,200 Rail 8,813,000 - - 26,657,400 - 353,200 Regional Arterials 12,960,000 - - 237,500 - 12,787,300 REG IONAL PROGRAMS Public and 9ziecialized Transit 12,003,000 94,000,000 23,203,600 135,000 - 696,900 Planning and Programming - - - 968,000 12,699,800 Rail Sation Maintenance/Operations - 3,843,000 2,213,700 372,700 Commuter Assistance 2,160,000 - - 2,049,600 Motorist Assistance - - 4,709,000 493,300 Toll Operations - 45,581,800 OTHER RNANCING SOURCES Debt Proceeds Tra n sre rs In TOTAL Fund ing Sources 106,081,000 181,899,300 $ 187,000,000 $ 94,000,000 $ 23,203,600 $ 59,105,700 $ 165,442,400 $ 375,827,900 Revenues —Definitions and Background $ 19,400 11,684,600 10,758,500 1,780,800 252,057,000 57,196,000 16,165,200 35,823,600 25,984,800 130,038,500 13,667,800 6,429,400 4,209,600 5,202,300 45,581,800 106,081,000 181,899,300 Q Qnd 57Q Ann Measure A: Measure A is a one-half of one percent transactions and use tax that was first approved by Riverside County voters in 1988 and expired on June 30, 2009 after 20-yearterm. On November 5, 2002, the voters of Riverside County approved the renewal of Measure A through 2039. the 2009 Measure A is expected to raise over$9 billion (in nominal dollars) during itslifespan. The amount raised by the Measure A levy increased asthe County and itseconomic base have grown during the past two decades, peaking in FY2016/17 at $175.3 million. Measure A revenues are projected to approximate $181,000,000 and $187,000,000 in FY 2017/18 and FY 2018/19, respectively. Measure A requires that all sales taxes collected may only be used for transportation purposes including administration and the construction, capital acquisition, maintenance, and operation of streets, roads, highways, including state highways, and public transit systems and for related purposes. These purposes include expendituresfor planning, environmental reviews, engineering and design costs, and related right of way acquisition. the Commission historically obtains and updates Measure A revenue projections through consultants for budget and strategic project planning purposes. A consultant prepares long- term economic forecast semiannually, and a sales tax services consultant provides Measure A revenue projections in connection with its quarterly sales tax analysis. Measure A revenue projections, based on such updates and other factors, for the next five fiscal years are presented in Chart 24 below. Chart 24 —Forecasted Measure A Sales Tax Revenues 2019 —2023 $220,000,000 $215,000,000 $210,000,000 $205,000,000 $200,000,000 $195,000,000 $190,000,000 $185,000,000 $180,000,000 $175,000,000 $170,000,000 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected 2022 Projected 2023 Projected The Commission considered the following additional assumptions in the development of the Commission'srevenue forecast for FY2018/19: • The Inland Empire economy will continue to expand through FY 2018/19 due to steady gains in the Inland Empire's labor market, population growth, and increased consumerand businessspending. • The State does not change the mix of items subject to the sales tax from what has been included historically. • The relative salesand property tax ratesof Riverside and surrounding countiesdo not change from historical levels. • Internet saleswill have minimal impact on revenue. the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan financing strategy considers these Measure A sales tax revenue projections. Geographic Allocation - Riverside County is comprised of three geographic areas: Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley. the percentage of Measure A revenues allocated to each of these areas based on return to source is approximately 78% for Western County, 22% for Coachella Valley, and less than 1% for Palo Verde Valley (Chart 25). lhese percentages experience some slight variationsfrom year to year based on changes in levels of taxable salesamong the geographic areas. Chart 25—Geographic Allocation of Measure A SalesTax Revenues Palo Verde Valley 0% Coachella Valley 22% Westem County 78% Program Allocation - The 2009 Measure A TIP defines the manner in which the sales tax revenues are to be spent, as presented in the Table 39. In Western County, public transit includes funding for specialized transit, commuter rail, intercity bus service, and commuter assistance. For the Coachella Valley, public transit includesspecialized transit and public busservices. Table 39 - Program Allocation of2009 Measure A SalesTax Revenues Western County • Bond Financing - 8% • Economic Development Incentives -1% • Highways- 30% • Localareetsand Roads -29% • New Corridors - 11% • Pub lic Tra nsit -12% • Regional Arterials -9% Coachella Valley •Highwaysand Regional Arterials-50% • Loca I areetsa nd Roads -35% • Public Transit -15% Palo Verde Valley • Localareetsand Roads- 100% Population (in Western County and Palo Verde Valley) or dwelling units (in Coachella Valley) and taxable sales determine the local streets and roads allocations to the local jurisdictions within each geographic area. Based on the projected Measure A sales tax revenues of $187,000,000 for FY2018/19, the geographic and program allocationsare presented in Table 40. Table 40 - Geographic Allocation Pro g ra m Bond Financing Economic Development Incentives Highways Highwaysand Regional Arterials Local &reetsand Roads New Corridors Public Transit Regional Arterials TOTAL of Measure A Sales Tax Revenues by Program FY2018/19 Western County Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley $ 11,664,000 $ 1,728,000 44,066,000 41,906,000 15,985,000 16,849,000 12,960,000 $ 145,158,000 $ 20,425,000 14,297,000 6,127,000 993,000 40,849,000 $ 993,000 $ Total - $ 11,664,000 1,728,000 44,066,000 20,425,000 57,196,000 15,985,000 22,976,000 12,960,000 187,000,000 Local Transportation Fund: One -quarter of one cent of the State's 7.75% sales tax funds LTF, established in state law by the TDA. The legislation provided a dependable revenue stream for public transportation operationsin California. Based upon an annual projection of LTFsalestaxes that considers economic forecast revenue projections prepared by a consultant, local economic factors, and monthly receipt trends, the Commission allocatesthe vast majority of LTF revenue in the County to the eight public transit operators, including the Commission for its share of Metrolink operations costs. Much like Measure A revenue, LTF increased with the County'sgrowth and itseconomy (Chart 26). Chart 26 —Local Transportation Fund SalesTax Revenue Trend 2015-2019 94,000,000 92,000,000 90,000,000 88,000,000 86,000,000 84,000,000 82,000,000 80,000,000 FY 14/15 Actual FY 15/16 Actual FY 16/17 Actual FY 17/18 Projected FY 18/19 Projected The Commission allocates LTF revenuesfor regional and local transportation planning, program administration, 93821 bicycle and pedestrian facilities projects, public bustransit, and rail transit, including the Commission's share for commuter rail operations in Western County. The Commission administersthese fundson behalf of the County in a special revenue fund. State Transit Assistance, including State of Good Repair: STA provides additional TDA state funding of transit operations and capital for urban counties, including the County'seight public transit operators (Chart 27). Sales taxes on diesel fuels historically generated the STA funding; however, beginning in FY 2017/18, SB 1 provides additional STA revenues for transit maintenance, rehabilitation, and capital projects. A potential repeal of SB 1 may affect future additional STA funding fortransit infrastructure repairand service improvements. Chart 27 —State Transit Assistance SalesTax revenue Trend 2015-2019 25,000,000 23,000,000 21,000,000 19,000,000 17,000,000 15,000,000 13,000,000 11,000,000 9,000,000 7,000,000 5,000,000 FY 14/15 Actual FY 15/16 Actual FY 16/17 Actual FY 17/18 Projected FY 18/19 Projected State Transportation Improvement Program: The CTC administers and fundsthe STIP, California's primary transportation fund, through state and federal gas tax dollars. The State's revenues are generated by an excise tax on gasoline, including SB 1 revenuesfrom increased taxeson motor fuels and vehicle fees that took effect in November2017. Dollars are allocated to each county based on a formula that takes into consideration population and highway centerline miles. Local transportation agenciessuch asthe Commission make project programming decisionsfor 75% of STIP dollars. As a result of alternative fuel vehicles, overall vehicle fuel efficiency, and lower gas prices, traditional STIP revenues steadily declined until SB 1. STIP reimbursement estimates are based on budgeted expenditures for specific projects with STIP allocations approved by the CTC. SB 132: Caltrans administers the $427 million appropriation from the state highway account to the Riverside County Transportation Efficiency Corridor projects in Western Riverside County as part of a package of legislation that paryrd with SB 1 in April 2017. SB 132 reimbursements represent budgeted expendituresforspecific projectswith SB 132 allocations. Cap and Trade Program: State legislation in 2006 requires a reduction of GHG emissions in the State. A key element of the GHG reduction program is the Cap and Trade Program in which entities regulated under the program can "trade" or buy and sell a portion of emission allowances issued by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) at auctions held during the year. The revenues generated for the State through these auctions are appropriated for infrastructure investments that include LCTDPand road programs, high speed rail projects, and transit and intercity rail projects. State reimbursement revenues include LCTDP revenues for commuter rail operations. Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) registration Fees: State law allows county SAFE agencies to impose a $1 surcharge on vehicle registrations within the County to pay for call box purchases and operations; excess SAFE revenues may be used for 511 operations and as a match for FSP operations. The call boxes enable motorists to summon help should they encounter mechanical or emergency problems while on the road, whereas the 1E511 system providesreal-time traffic and transit trip information available via the intemet ortelephone. Caltrans Freeway Service Patrol Allocations: Caltrans is the primary sponsor of the FSP and providesthe majority of funding for the program, including towing servicesin construction zones. The State provides nearly 80%of the funding for the MD program based on population, freeway miles, and level of congestion throughout the State. The Commission administers and implementsthe program along with the CHP and Caltrans. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality: The federally funded CMAQ program targets transportation improvements in areas with air quality problems. This program pays for improvements that reduce congestion while improving air quality. The Commission also uses CMAQ dollars for commuter assistance programs, HOV lanes, and transit projects. CMAQ reimbursement estimates represent budgeted expenditures for specific projects with CMAQ allocations. Federal Transit Administration: The federal government generally allocates FTA funds annually to urbanized areas based on calculated miles of service. On a reimbursement basis, the federal government providesfunding to the Commission for qualified capital investments in rail facilities, track, and vehicles. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee: In connection with the 2009 Measure A, the TUMF program was established in the Western County to provide additional funding for regional arterial projects. WRCOG administers the TUMFprogram. The Commission receives significant of the TUMF revenues, divided equally between the regional arterial and CETAP programs, based on a MOU with WRCOG. WRCOG maintains TUMF revenues for regional arterial zone improvements and regional transit facilities. The Commission projects TUMF revenue (Chart 28) based on monthly receipt trends and consideration of local housing and commercial construction activity in the County. Chart 28 —Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Revenue Trend 2015-2019 24,000,000 23,000,000 22,000,000 21,000,000 20,000,000 19,000,000 18,000,000 17,000,000 FY 14/15 Actual FY 15/16Actual FY 16/17ActuaI FY 17/18 Projected FY 18/19 Projected Rail and Highway Licenses: The Commission owns parcels of land and right of way for highway, rail, and regional arterial projects in selected areas throughout the County. The ownership provides licensing and leasing opportunitiesfor fiber-optic cable, advertising signs, and business tenants. The amount of funding received from the licenses and leases supports the cost of owning and maintaining the Commission'sland and facilities. Toll Revenue: The Commission and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) entered into a cooperative agreement in 2011 forthe RCTC 91 Express Lanesand OCTA 91 Express Lanes to be interoperable and operated by the same toll operator. A subsequent agreement executed in 2013 among the Commission, OCTA, and the operator results in a single operator providing most operations and first line maintenance services for a single 91 Express Lanes system in Riverside and Orange counties. Notwithstanding their physical connection and use of the same toll operator, the RCTC 91 Express Lanes and OCTA 91 Express Lanesare independent enterprises; however, each agency charges independent tolls for its express lanes. FY 2018/19 toll revenues represent projected tolls for the RCTC 91 Express Lanes based on estimated toll transactionsand traffic and revenue data. Non -toll Revenues: The 2011 cooperative agreement between the Commission and OCTA regarding the 91 Express Lanes also included cost and revenue sharing among other provisions. Non -toll revenues consist of revenues not attributable directly to toll transactions derived through administration by the operator of transaction -based fees and account -based fees. The Commission estimated FY 2018/19 non -toll revenues based on current data from the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. Investment Income: The Commission established a prudent investment policy that isintended to provide absolute safeguards on principal and liquidity as well maximize return, as noted in Section 1. The Commission conservatively estimated interest earnings on the State and County investment pools at an interest rate of 0.50%and funds held by the trustee for debt service and projectsat 0.75%. Program Revenues and Other Sources The Commission allocated revenues and otherfinancing sourcesfor FY2018/19 asfollows: Chart 29-Program RevenuesFY2018/19 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50, 000,0 00 $_ — `d u I l o es COP ec'' OJs 6' 4' �S�G cce C., ,f Ara d'9O Goya �o�o�° S' o co�ooe o e\S�ee�s ÷e 0 0 <o‘, g 1LI .4 co``' Asa „c,c, P e e fie. O eopti aQ�oo' oe\0 ,6 o�5�p- o O Oep� rlc'Q.ecOC` _ oe e cs as OCG `e,`O Ge¢� \ e �a e Sq s9s e Quo \c o Measure A n LiF u STA o Federal u 3ate h+Loca VToll/Other Management Services The primary funding sources for management services are transfers in of Measure A of $4,366,100, OF of $81,700 and $4,191,200 from TUMF, S4FE, FSP, STA, SB 132, Coachella Valley Rail, toll operations, and other agency projects for administrative costs. Local and other revenues include $400 related to reimbursements for administrative activities and investment revenues of $19,000. Bond Financing Measure A Western County revenues of $11,664,000 will be used to support bond financing costs. Investment revenuesare $20,600. C EfAP The Western County CETAP program anticipates$10,500,000 from TUMFfor development of new CETAPcorridors. Local and other revenuesinclude $258,500 representing investment income. Economic Development In order to attract commercial and industrial development and jobs to locate in the Western County area, Measure A Western County revenues of $1,728,000 will be used to create an infrastructure improvement bank to improve and construct interchanges, provide public transit linkages or stations, and make other improvements to the transportation system. Investment eamingsare $52,800. Highways Funding for the highway program includes2009 Measure A salestax revenuesof $64,491,000 for Western County highways and Coachella Valley highways and regional arterial programs. The 2009 Measure A Western County sales tax revenues will be used primarily to fund debt service related to the financing of the 91 Project and 1-15 Express Lanes project. Unexpended 1989 Measure A Western County revenuesfrom prior yearswill be used on remaining projectssuch as the Pachappa underpassproject. Federal fundsfor highway projects include: • $635,000 in CMAQ fundsfor the SR91 HOV lanes; • $6,500,000 and $2,629,000 in CMAQ and federal earmarks, respectively for the Pachappa underpass; • $15,119,000 in CMAQ and Surface Transportation Block Grant (SIBG) funds for the 1-15 Express La nes p roject; • $549,600 in demonstration fundsfor the 71/91 interchange improvements; and • $2,800,200 for BABs subsid y payments related to the 2010B Bonds. State fundsfor highway projectsinclude: • STIP and Proposition 1Bfunding of$1,000,OOOforthe 1-215 corridor improvements; • STIPfunding of $5,061,300 forthe 1-15 Express Lanessouthem extension project; • STIPfund ing of $26,800,000 for the SR60 truck climbing lanes; • SB 1 Local Partnership Program revenues of $4,272,000 for the Pachappa underpass project and $2,000,000 for the 71/91 connector project; and " $118,418,400 of SB 132 funding for the 15/91 Express Lanes connector, 1-15/Limonite interchange, McKinley and Jurupa Avenue grade separation, and Hamner Bridge widening projects. Additional local funding includes $99,000 in lease revenues, $100,000 in local reimbursements related to carpool violations, and investment revenue of $1,582,500. In FY2018/19, the Commission anticipates$106,081,000 in a federal TIFIA loan drawdown to fund the I-15 ExpressLanesproject. Transfers in include: " $45,634,500 in sales tax bond proceeds to fund the 1-15 Express Lanes project and the completion of the 91 Project; " $69,555,700 to the Sales Tax Bondsdebt service fund for Measure A Western County and Coachella Valley highwaysdebt service; " $3,000,000 to the Debt Service fund asa Commission loan to fund a TIFIA Loan reserve for the 1-15 ExpressLanesproject; " $6,000,000 to the 2009 Measure A Western County highways fund from the RCTC 91 ExpressLanesfund forthe 91 Corridor Operationsproject; and " $15,900,200 to the 2009 Measure A Western County highways fund from the 2009 Measure A Western County bond financing fund fordebt service. Local Streets and Roads The Commission anticipatesthe allocation and distribution of $57,196,000 in Measure A fundsfor the local streets and roads program to the cities and the County for local street repairs, maintenance, and construction. New Corridors To leverage local, state, and federal funding for four new transportation corridors identified through CETAP, Measure A Western County revenues of $15,985,000 will be available for environmental clearance, right of way acquisition, and construction of these new corridors. Additional local and other funds include $160,000 in lease revenues and $20,200 in investment revenues. Ra it The Commission expects the allocation of $8,813,000 in 2009 Measure A Western County public transit program funds for rail. Federal funds consist of $9,657,400 and $15,000,000 for station rehabilitation and improvement projects and SCRRA capital projects, respectively, and $2,000,000 for the development of Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail service. Local and other revenues include $280,000 for property lease revenues and $73,200 in investment revenue. Transfers in consist of $250,000 from Proposition 1B funding for a station rehabilitation project and $350,000 from the STA fund for the development of Coachella Valley - San Gorgonio Passcorridor rail service. Regional Arterials The Western County regional arterial program expects Measure A and TUMF revenues of $12,960,000 and $12,422,200, respectively. The new TUMF revenues along with unexpended TUMF revenues from prior years will be the primary source of funding TUMF regional arterial projects. Federal revenues consist of $237,500 for a Lake Elsinore regional arterial project managed by the Commission. Other local revenues consist of investment income of $365,100. Transfers in consist of $300,000 from the 2009 Measure A Western County highway fund for the SR79 realignment project. Public and Specialized Transit The Commission anticipates LTF sales tax revenues of $94,000,000 allocated primarily for public bus and rail transit operations and capital in the County. The Commission allocates a small portion of these revenues for planning and administration as well as SB 821 bicycle and pedestrian facilities grants. The Commission also expects STA allocations of $23,203,600 for the County's public transit operators. For the FY 2018/19 budget, the Commission will use unexpended LTFand STA revenues from prior years to fund transit operations as well as bicycle and pedestrian facilitiesgrants. Under the 2009 Measure A, the Commission estimates public transit funding of $12,003,000 for Western County specialized transit and intercity bus services and Coachella Valley specialized and public transit services. The Commission expects federal revenues of $135,000 as a pass - through for a Palo Verde Valley transit project. Transfers in consist of $1,500,000 from 2009 Measure A Western County commuter assistance fund and $132,500 from OF for administrative costs. Local revenuesrepresent investment income of $696,000. Planning and Programming Planning and programming transfers in consist of: • An off -the -top allocation of $2,820,000, or three percent of estimated LTF revenues, for transportation planning studies; • A LTFallocation of $1,017,400 for administrative costs; and • A LTFallocation of $2,000,000 to fund grade separation projects in the city of Corona. STIP of $968,000 will fund PPM activities of the Commission and CVAG. Local and other revenues consist of $800,000 for a traffic signal synchronization coordination project, $11,880,000 for the District's projects, and investment income of $19,800. Rail Station Maintenance and Operations Rail operations include Metrolink operating and capital contributions, station maintenance, and support. The Commission will fund these rail activities with LTF allocation transfers in of $21,200,000. Federal CMAQ funds of $3,843,000 relate to SCRRA security costs and operations at the PVL stations. State reimbursements of $2,213,700 will fund operations at the PVL stations and station improvements. In addition to investment revenues of $60,000, local and other revenues include $312,700 in reimbursements for Metrolink violator citations and miscellaneous vending machine revenues. Commuter Assistance The Commission anticipates funding of $2,160,000 from 2009 Measure A Western County public transit to the commuter assistance program for services to commuters and employers in promoting use of alternate modes of transportation in Western County. Local and other revenues consist of investment income of $61,700 and SBCTA reimbursements of $1,987,900 for support of the San Bernardino County commuter assistance program and regional ridematching. Motorist Assista nc e DMV registration fees of $1,800,000 and Caltrans state highway account allocations of $2,909,000 will fund SAFE and FP services, respectively. The Commission will also receive local reimbursements of $231,600 to support S$CTA's share of the 1E511 system operations and cost recoveries of $225,300 from responsible parties related to call box knockdowns. Investment income is $36,400. An operating transfer in from SAFE of $3,600,000 serves as a match to the State's FSP contribution. Toll Operations Tolls, penalties, and fee of $36,940,500 will fund the RCTC 91 Express Lanes toll operations. Local and other revenues include $8,500,000 for proceeds of the sale of excess properties and $141,300 in investment income. Commission Debt The Commission incurred debt for highway (non -tolled and tolled), new corridor, regional arterial, and local streets and roads projects for which title usually vests or, upon completion, will vest with Caltrans or local jurisdictions for ongoing operations and maintenance. The financed projects are not ascots of the Commission for which the Commission will have operating responsibilities, except for the intangible rights to operate the express lanes on SR-91 and 1-15. Accordingly, future operating costs related to the non -capitalized projects cannot be determined and are not applicable to the annual budget. Operating budget impacts for the Commission's toll arts and rail arts, which were not financed, are included in the annual budget. The Commission pledged future Measure A sales taxes as security for Measure A debt service payments on the sales tax revenue bonds and commercial paper notes. Toll revenues generated on the RCTC 91 ExpressLanesare pledged to pay debt service on the 2013 Toll Bonds and 2013 11FIA loan for the 91 Project; future toll revenues generated on the 1-15 Express Lanes are pledged to pay debt service on the federal 11RA loan executed in 2017 (2017 T1FTA Loan) for the 1-15 Express Lanes project. Table 41 presents a summary of the anticipated changes in the Commission's debt during FY 2018/19. The Commission excludes accretion amounts related to capital appreciation bonds and compounded interest on the T1RA loans, asthey do not affect the annual budget activities. Table 41 —Changes in Commission Debt Projected Balance Projected Balance July 1, 2018 Additions (Reductions) June 30, 2019 2010BSalesTaxBonds $ 112,370,000 $ - $ 2013 Sales Tax Bonds 66,795,000 2013 Toll Bonds 179,752,806 2016 Sales Tax Refunding Bonds 74,540,000 2017A Sales Tax Bonds 155,050,000 2017BSalesTaxRefunding Bonds 392,730,000 2018 Sales Tax Refunding Bonds 63,540,000 201311RA Loan -91 Express Lanes 421,054,400 201711F1A Loan - 1-15 Express Lanes 106,081,000 Commercial Paper (12,090,000) (4,940,000) (4,470,000) (4,465,000) $ 1,465,832,206 $ 106,081,000 $ (25,965,000) $ 112,370,000 54,705,000 179,752,806 69,600,000 150,580,000 392,730,000 59,075,000 421,054,400 106,081,000 $ 1,545,948,206 In March 2005, the Commission established a commercial paper program to advance project development and land and right of way acquisition under the 2009 Measure A TIP. The current commercial paper program authorization is $60,000,000. The Commission generally rolls over commercial paper note maturitiesto new note issuances unless refinanced with long-term sales tax bond issuances. The Commission currently maintains P-1 and an A-1+ rating from Moody's Investors Service (Moody's) and Standard and Poor's Rating Service (S&P), respectively, on the commercial paper notes. Available commercial paper proceeds or sales tax revenues fund commercial paper interest payments. During FY 2017/18, the Commission retired $30,000,000 of the total outstanding commercial paper notes in connection with the issuance of the 2017 SeriesA Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (2017A Bonds). The Commission issued no commercial paper notes in FY 2017/18, and it anticipates no issuances of commercial paper notes in FY2018/19 — resulting in $0outstanding amount of commercial paper projected at June 30, 2019. Accordingly, the FY2018/19 budget includes no commercial paper interest payments. The Commercial Paper capital projects fund accountsfor commercial paper activities. As credit and liquidity support for the commercial paper notes, the Commission has an irrevocable direct draw letter of credit in the amount of $60,750,000 and reimbursement agreement with State Street Bank and Trust Company (State Street Bank), which expires in October 2020. The costs for the liquidity support are reflected in the 2009 Measure A Western County Bond Financing special revenue fund. Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Under the provisions of the 2009 Measure A, the Commission has the authority to issue sales tax revenue bonds subject to a debt limitation of $975 million, reflecting an increase from the original authorization of $500 million because of the November 2010 voter approval of Measure K. The sales tax revenue bonds are secured by a pledge of the 2009 Measure A revenues. All sales tax revenue bonds mature on or before June 2039, prior to the expiration of the 2009 Measure A. Asa meansto achieve a greater level of interest rate stability, the Commission entered into two interest rate swaps for a total notional amount of $185,000,000 at a fixed rate for 20 years effective October 2009. In connection with the commencement of the interest rate swaps in October 2009, the Commission issued $185,000,000 in variable rate sales tax revenue bonds to retire outstanding commercial paper notes, refund bonds issued in 2008, fund a portion of the debt service reserve, and pay issuance costs. The Commission terminated these swaps at a termination cost and refinanced all of the related variable rate sales tax bonds by issuing fixed rate refunding salestax revenue bonds in September2016and April2018. In November2010, the Commission issued $37,630,000 in fixed rate tax-exempt salestax revenue bonds (2010A Bonds) and $112,370,000 in fixed rate taxable 2010B Bonds designated as BABs under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The Commission used proceeds from the aggregate amount issued of $150,000,000 to retire outstanding commercial paper notes, provide funds for 2009 Measure A Western County capital projects, and pay issuance costs. The Commission refunded all of the outstanding 2010A Bonds in December 2017. The Commission designated a portion of the BABs as recovery zone economic development bonds (RZEDBs). The Commission expects to receive a cash subsidy from the United States Treasury equal to 35% of the interest payable on the BABs or 45% of the interest payable on the 2010B Bonds designated asRZEDBs. However, reductions in the BABssubsidiesoccurred in recent years due to federal sequestration cuts. If sequestration continues, the Commission anticipates a reduction in the FY2018/19 BA%subsidy of 6.1%. Estimated net debt service payments for the 2010B Bonds in FY 2018/19 are $0 for principal and $7,649,000 for interest payments. Federal reimbursement include the $2,800,200 projected cash subsidy payment. In July 2013, the Commission issued $462,200,000 in fixed rate salestax revenue bonds (2013 Sales Tax Bonds), at a premium, in connection with the 91 Project. The Commission used the proceeds of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds to fund a substantial portion of the 91 Project costs, retire outstanding commercial paper notes, pay capitalized interest through December 2017, and pay issuance costs. The Commission refunded the callable portion of the 2013 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds in December 2017. Estimated debt service payments in FY 2018/19 for the remaining 2013 Sales Tax Bonds are $12,090,OOOfor principal and $3,339,800 for interest payments. In September 2016, the Commission issued $76,140,000 in fixed rate sales tax revenue refunding bonds (2016 Refunding Bonds), at a premium, to refund all of the outstanding Series A bonds issued in 2009, retire all of the commercial paper notes, and pay issuance costs. Estimated debt service payments for the 2016 Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds are $4,940,000 for principal and $2,513,100 for interest payments. In July 2017, the Commission issued $158,760,000 in fixed rate 2017A Bonds, at a premium, to fund the 1-15 Express Lanes project and completion of the 91 Project. The Commission used the proceeds of the 2017A Bonds to fund 1-15 Express Lanes project costs, completion of the 91 Project, retire outstanding commercial paper notes, and pay issuance costs. Estimated debt service payments for the 2017A Bonds in FY 2018/19 are $4,470,000 for principal and $7,545,500 for interest payments. In December 2017 as result of pending federal tax reform legislation that eliminated advance refundings, the Commission issued $392,730,000 in fixed rate sales tax revenue refunding bonds (2017B Refunding Bonds), at a premium, to refund all of the outstanding 2010A Bonds and the callable portion of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds and pay issuance costs. Estimated debt service payments for the 2017B Refunding Bonds in FY 2018/19 are $0 for principal and $19,366,300 for interest payments. In April 2018 due to federal tax reform legislation impacts, the Commission issued $64,285,000 in fixed rate salestax revenue refunding bonds (2018 Refunding Bonds), at a premium, to refund all of the outstanding Series B and Series C bonds issued in 2009, finance the related swap termination payment, and pay issuance costs. Estimated debt service payments for the 2018 Refunding Bondsare $4,465,OOOfor principal and $3,177,OOOfor interest payments. The Commission received long-term debt ratings of Aa2, AA+, and AA from Moody's, S&P, and Fitch Ratings (Fitc h), respectively on its currently outstanding salestax revenue bonds. Toll Revenue Bonds and 11FIA Leans 91 Project In July 2010, the Commission authorized the issuance of up to $900,000,000 in toll revenue bonds in anticipation of the financing requirementsforthe 91 Project. In July 2013, the Commission issued $176,654,600 in 2013 Toll Bonds, at a discount, that consist of $123,825,000 in current interest bonds (CIBs) and $52,829,600 in capital appreciation bonds (CABs). The ClBs have maturity datesthrough June 2048, while the CABs mature at the accreted value commencing June 2022 through June 2043. Estimated debt service paymentsfor the 2013 Toll Bonds in FY 2018/19 are $0 for principal and $7,119,900 for interest payments. The 2013 Toll Bondsare secured by a lien on the trust estate, which consists primarily of toll revenuesand non - toll transaction and account revenues less operating and maintenance expenses of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. In July 2013, the Commission executed the 2013 TIFIA Loan with the United States Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) in an amount up to $421,054,400, which provided the final puzzle piece needed for the full funding of the 91 Project. The 2013 TIFIA Loan is a toll revenue bond subordinate to the 2013 Toll Bonds unless and until the occurrence of a bankruptcy related event. The Commission obtained proceeds on the full amount of the 2013 TIFiA Loan through FY 2016/17 after meeting certain conditions. Interest on outstanding disbursements is 3.47% and is compounded semiannually. The 2013 TIFiA Loan matures on the June 2051. Interest payments commence on the fifth anniversary of the substantial completion date (March 2017) or the first interest payment date occurring prior to the fifth anniversary date. Accordingly, semiannual interest paymentscommence December2021; principal paymentscommence annually in June 2030. The RCTC 91 Express Lanes trust estate also secures the 2013 TIFIA Loan, similar to the 2013 Toll Bonds. The Commission is required to fund a $20,000,000 TIFiA debt service reserve prior to July 2019 from sale proceeds of excess land acquired for the 91 Project or other available revenues, including surplus toll revenues. The Commission included the 2013 TIFiA Loan reserve funding in the enterprise fund. The 2013 Toll Bonds and the 2013 11RA Loan received long-term ratings of BBB -from S&P and Fitch. 1-15 Exp ress La nes Project In May 2017, the Commission authorized the issuance of up to $165,000,000 in toll revenue bonds in anticipation of the financing requirementsforthe 1-15 ExpressLanesproject. In July 2017, the Commission executed a federal TIRA loan (2017 11RA Loan) with the U.S. DOTin an amount up to $152,214,260. The 2017 TIRA Loan as well as the 2017 Bonds, $110,000,000 in federal funds, and project expenses already paid from 2009 Measure A revenues provided the full funding of the 1-15 Express Lanes project. The 2017 TIRA Loan is a senior toll revenue bond, and proceeds of the 2017 TIRA Loan may be drawn upon after certain conditions are met. Interest on outstanding disbursements is2.84%and is compounded semiannually. The 201711RA loan is expected to mature on the earlier of 35 years after substantial completion of the 1-15 ExpressLanesproject or June 1, 2056. Interest paymentsare expected to commence on the fifth anniversary of the substantial completion date or the first interest payment date occurring prior to the fifth anniversary date. Accordingly, semiannual interest payments are anticipated to commence June 2025; principal paymentsare expected to commence in June 2030. The Commission is required to fund an $18,000,000 TIRA debt service reserve no later than June 30, 2024 from toll revenues and a Commission loan from salestax revenuesto the extent that toll revenues are insufficient. The FY 2018/19 budget includes a $3,000,000 transfer from the 2009 Measure A Western County highway fund to the Debt Service fund to establish the initial reserve funding. The Commission also anticipates providing additional liquidity support in the form of a Commission backstop loan from salestax revenues in the annual amount up to $3,850,000 up to a maximum total amount of $38,500,000 from FY2024/25 through FY2038/2039. The Commission loans will be repaid from available toll revenues after meeting certain blocked payment tests. The 2017 TIRA Loan is secured by a lien on the trust estate, which consists primarily of toll revenues and non -toll revenues (including account and violations revenues) less operating and maintenance expensesof the 1-15 Express Lanes. Debt Capacity Analysis The Commission is legally prohibited from issuing additional sales tax revenue debt if its debt coverage ratio islessthan 1.5 to 1 on all senior salestax revenue debt. The Commission adopted a higher standard of 2 to 1 as part of its debt management policy. As Chart 30 and Table 42 indicate, the Commission successfully met its policy standard for sales tax revenue debt issued under the 2009 Measure A. The 1989 Measure A related debt consistently exceeded the Commission's standard, and coverage for the 2009 Measure A related debt of 2.8 isanticipated for FY2018/19. Any coverage lessthan 2 to 1 would necessitate using other program funding to coverall debt service expenditures. Chart 30 -Measure A Sales Tax Debt Capacity Analysis $200,000,000 $180,000,000 $160,000,000 $140,000,000 $120,000,000 $100,000,000 $80, 000 ,000 $60, 000 ,000 $40, 000 ,000 $20, 000 ,000 $- FY 2017/ 18 FY 2018/ 19 Table 42 —Measure A Sales Tax Debt Capacity Analysis ISeniorDebt rvice -4Available Revenues FY 17/ 18 FY 18/ 19 Sales Tax Revenues $ 181,000,000 $ 187,000,000 Senior Debt Service $ 69,167,100 $ 66,755,500 Coverage Ratio -Senior Debt 2.6 2.8 Long -Term Debt Rating Aa2/AA+/AA Aa2/AA+/AA Commercial Paper Rating P-1/A-1+ P-1/A-1+ Upon the execution of the 2017 11FIA Loan, the toll -supported debt consistsof the 2013 Toll Bonds and 201711FIA Loan asseniordebt and the 201311F1A Loan assubordinate debt. Beginning in the first full fiscal year following substantial completion of the express lanes projects, the Commission is required to establish and collect tolls in connection with the toll road to produce net revenuesequal to or in excessof the following ratios: Covera • e Ratios 2013 Toll Bonds/201311RA Loan 2017 lIFIA Loan Senior lien debt 150% Total debt Total debt plus reserve deposits and certain other funds established under the applicable indenture 130% 130% 100% 100% the Commission expects to exceed the toll coverage ratio requirements for the 2013 Toll Bonds and 2013 TIFIA Loan with a coverage ratio of 262%for FY2018/19. Aggregate Debt Service Schedule for Sales Tax Bonds Debt service requirements(Table 43 and Chart 31) forthe salestax revenue bondsare based on amortization schedulesfor the 2010B Bonds, net of the BABssubsidy; 2013A Sales Tax Bonds; 2016 Refunding Bonds; 2017A Bonds; 2017B Refund ing Bonds; and 2018 Refunding Bonds. Table 43 —Commission Sales Tax F venue Bonds Net Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year Principal Interest Rabsidy Payments Net Debt Service 2019 $ 25,965,000 $ 43,590,700 $ (2,800,200) 2020 27,245,000 42,897,100 (2,982,100) 2021 28,495,000 42,263,200 (2,982,100) 2022 29,995,000 41,504,600 (2,982,100) 2023 31,405,000 40,755,300 (2,982,100) 2024-2028 178,120,000 167,826,500 (14,910,500) 2029-2033 219,095,000 122,256,900 (14,897,900) 2034-2038 264,305,000 61,148,300 (9,470,800) 2039 60,400,000 3,344,800 (550,800) Total $ 865,025,000 $ 565,587,400 $ (54,558,600) Chart31 —Commission SalesTax Revenue Bonds Debt Service through Maturity $so,000,000 $70,000,000 $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 ,iiiiiililllllllll 0O����D O0O0O���r�Q O�O�O�O�9S'3DO���,�PO���,�SO����bO�b�,S�0�4)cb �3Q -l� -lry try -r� -\� -l� -lry try -r� -1`� -lry -lry try -\' 1� - ry try try -\' -1- ry F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F Outstanding Debt and Debt Service Requirements as of June 30, 2019 $ 66,755,500 67,160,000 67,776,100 68,517,500 69,178,200 331,036,000 326,454,000 315,982,500 63,194,000 $ 1,376,053,800 uSalesTax Revenue Interest oallesTax Revenue Principal lhe following is summary of debt issued and secured by 2009 Measure A sales tax revenues, receipt of which began in FY2009/10: 2005 Commercial Paper Notes (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A: In February 2005, the Commission authorized a $200 million commercial paper program. In March 2005, the Commission established the program for $185,000,000 Commercial Paper Notes (Limited Tax Bonds), SeriesA and B. In October 2010, the Commission reduced the program to $120 million; in September 2013, the Commission further reduced the program to $60 million. the repayment of principal and interest on the commercial paper notes is secured by an irrevocable direct draw letter of credit issued by State Street Bank, and the Measure A sales tax revenues secure such repayment. Maturities of the commercial paper notes may range from one to 270 days, and interest rates are variable and dependent on current market conditions. the Commission anticipatesno outstanding commercial paper notesat June 30, 2019. the note agreements require the trustee to hold all note proceeds and a portion of sales tax revenuesand to segregate all fundsinto separate accountsas required by the indentures. 2010 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), SeriesA Tax -Exempt and Series B Taxable: In November 2010, the Commission issued $150,000,000 principal amount of serial bondsto retire all of the outstanding principal amount of the commercial paper notes, fund project costs, and pay issuance costs. the Commission refunded the 2010A Bonds in December 2017. the outstanding 2010B Bonds mature in annual installments ranging from $530,000 to $17,980,000 on various dates from June 1, 2032 through June 1, 2039. The interest rate for the 2010B Bonds is 6.807%. The Commission expects to receive BAB cash subsid ies from the U.S. Treasury related to the 2010B Bonds; however, sequestration cutsmay continue to affect the subsidy amounts. The 2010B Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceedsand a portion of sales tax revenuesand to segregate all funds into separate accountsasrequired by the indentures. Table 44 summarizes the debt service requirements, net of subsidy payments for the 2010B Bonds. Table 44-2010 Sales Tax Revenue Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-2028 2029-2033 2034-2038 2039 Total Bonds Net Debt Service Requirements Principal Interest $ $ 7,649,000 - 7,649,000 - 7,649,000 7,649,000 7,649,000 - 38,245,000 14,540,000 38,208,900 79,850,000 22,887,600 17,980,000 1,223,800 Subsidy Net Debt Service $ (2,800,200) (2,982,100) (2,982,100) (2,982,100) (2,982,100) (14,910,500) (14,897,900) (9,470,800) (550,800) $ 112,370,000 $ 138,810,300 $ (54,558,600) $ 4,848,800 4,666,900 4,666,900 4,666,900 4,666,900 23,334,500 37,851,000 93,266,800 18,653,000 $ 196,621,700 2013 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A Tax -Exempt: In July 2013, the Commission issued $462,200,000 principal amount of serial bonds at a premium of $38,328,800 to retire all of the outstanding principal amount of commercial paper notes, fund a portion of the 91 Project costs, pay capitalized interest during construction, and pay issuance costs. In December 2017, the Commission refunded the callable portion of the outstanding 2013 Sales Tax Bonds. The bonds mature in annual installments ranging from $12,090,000 to $14,695,000 on variousdatesfrom June 1, 2019 through June 1, 2023; the interest rate is5.00%. The 2013 Sales Tax Bond agreementsrequire the trustee to hold all bond proceedsand a portion of sales tax revenues and to segregate all funds into separate accounts as required by the indentures. Table 45 summarizesdebt service requirementsforthe 2013 Sales Tax Bonds. Table 45-2013 SalesTax Revenue Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Bonds Debt Service Requirements Principal $ 12,090,000 $ 12,690,000 13,325,000 13,995,000 14,695,000 Interest 3,339,800 3,339,800 3,339,800 3,339,800 3,339,800 Total Debt Service $ 66,795,000 $ 16,699,000 $ 15,429,800 16,029,800 16,664,800 17,334,800 18,034,800 $ 83,494,000 2016 Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds(Limited Tax Bonds), SeriesA Tax Exempt: In September 2016, the Commission issued $76,140,000 in fixed rate sales tax revenue refunding bonds, at a premium of $8,414,007, to refund all of the outstanding SeriesA bonds issued in 2009, retire all of the commercial paper notes, and pay issuance costs. The bonds mature in annual installments ranging from $2,900,000 to $7,305,000 on various dates from June 1, 2019 through June 1, 2029 with interest rates ranging from 2.00%to 5.00%. Table 46 summarizes debt service requirements for the 2016 Refunding Bonds. Table 46-2016 SalesTax Revenue Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-2028 2029-2030 Total F funding Bonds Debt Service Principal $ 4,940,000 5,185, 000 5,445,000 5,720,000 6,005,000 32,775,000 14,470,000 Requirements Interest $ 2,513,100 2,266,100 2,006,900 1,734,600 1,448,600 4,494,500 435,500 Total Debt Service $ 74,540,000 $ 14,899,300 $ 7,453,100 7,451,100 7,451,900 7,454,600 7,453,600 37,269,500 14,905,500 $ 89,439,300 2017 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), Series A Tax Exempt: In July 2017, the Commission issued $158,760,000 principal amount, at a net premium of $28,931,909, to primarily fund the 1-15 Express Lanes project and completion of the 91 Project. The bonds mature in installments ranging from $3,710,000 to $11,440,000 on various dates from June 1, 2019 through June 1, 2039 with interest rates ranging from 3.00%to 5.00%. Table 47 summarizes debt Service requirementsforthe 2017A Bonds. Table 47 —2017 A SalesTax Ibvenue Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-2028 2029-2033 2034-2038 2039 Tota I Principal $ 4,470,000 4,690,000 4,835,000 5,075,000 5,280,000 30,620,000 39,050,000 49,590,000 11,440,000 Interest $ 7,545,500 7,322,000 7,181,300 6,939,500 6,736,500 29,450,000 21,022,900 10,477,300 572,000 Total Debt Service $ 155,050,000 $ 97,247,000 $ 12,015,500 12,012,000 12,016,300 12,014,500 12,016,500 60,070,000 60,072,900 60,067,300 12,012,000 $ 252,297,000 2017 SalesTax Revenue Refunding Bonds(Limited Tax Bonds), SeriesBTaxExempt: In December 2017, the Commission issued $392,730,000 in fixed rate sales tax revenue refunding bonds, at a premium of $80,058,109, to refund all of the outstanding 2010A Bonds, refund a portion of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds, and pay issuance costs. lhe bonds mature in annual installments ranging from $15,045,000 to $30,980,000 on various dates from June 1, 2024 through June 1, 2039 with interest ranging from 4.00%to 5.00%. Table 48 summarizes the debt service requirements for the 2017B Refund ing Bonds. Table 48 —2017 BSales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year Principal Interest Total Debt Service 2019 $ - $ 19,366,300 2020 19,366,400 2021 19,366,400 2022 19,366,400 2023 - 19,366,400 2024-2028 83,140,000 88,923,100 2029-2033 143,745,000 62,225,100 2034-2038 134,865,000 27,783,400 2039 30,980,000 1,549,000 Total $ 392,730,000 $ 277,312,500 $ 19,366,300 19,366,400 19,366,400 19,366,400 19,366,400 172,063,100 205,970,100 162,648,400 32,529,000 $ 670,042,500 2018 Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds (Limited Tax Bonds), SeriesA Tax Exempt: In April 2018, the Commission issued $64,285,000 in fixed rate salestax revenue refunding bonds, at a premium of $10,723,789, to refund all of the outstanding SeriesBand SeriesC bonds issued in 2009, finance the swap termination payment, and pay issuance costs. The bonds mature in annual installments ranging from $745,000 to $7,290,000 on va rious d ates from June 1, 2019 through June 1, 2029 with interest rates ranging from 4.00% to 5.00%. Table 49 summarizes debt service requirements for the 2018 Refunding Bonds. Table 49-2018 Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year Principal Interest Total Debt Service 2019 $ 4,465,000 $ 3,177,000 2020 4,680,000 2,953,800 2021 4,890,000 2,719,800 2022 5,205,000 2,475,300 2023 5,425,000 2,215,000 2024-2028 31,585,000 6,713,900 2029-2033 7,290,000 364,500 Total $ 63,540,000 $ 20,619,300 $ 7,642,000 7,633,800 7,609,800 7,680,300 7,640,000 38,298,900 7,654,500 $ 84,159,300 Chart 32 presents the allocation of the sales tax revenue bonds to the 2009 Measure A programs. A significant portion of the sales tax revenue bonds funded highway and regional arterial projects in the Western County and Coachella Valley; however, less than 1% funded local streetsand roadsprojectsin the Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley. Chart 32 —Program Long -Term Debt Hig hw aysa nd Regional Arterials 100% Chart 33 presents the allocation of the sales tax revenue bonds by the benefiting geographic area. Chart 33 —Long-Term Debt by Geographic Area Coachella Valley 2% i Western County 98% Debt Service Schedulesfor Toll Revenue Bonds Chart 34 depicts the debt service requirements for the 2013 Toll Bonds. the 2013 Toll Bond agreements require the trustee to hold all bond proceeds and segregate funds into separate accountsasrequired by the indenture. Chart 34 —Toll Revenue Bonds Debt Service through Maturity $50,000,000 $45,000,000 $40,000,000 $35,000,000 $30,000,000 $25,000,000 $20,000,000 $15,000,000 $$5 000,000 I I I 1 I I I I I I I $5,000,000 I I — $- — 1��,q 1q\ry°�y°'1,` ryry�yry\ry��}ry°'�yb\ry`'�yh�ry"�yb\ry ry����y�0,\�yq��°' \,5` \�ry'*���5^�3\Dt' \fy^�5\�b^�b���'3�\���q'3q\u°D�\a`bo-ry\P Q��oP D�`\DP p5\ab Dbp�\a� ,10 ,ti° ,10 ,y0 ,1° �O ,y° ,10 ,y° ,10 ,ti0 ,° ,y0 ,1° �° ,y0 ,10 ,y° �° ,ti0 ,10 ,y0 ,° �O ,y0 ,10 „s ,10 ,ti0 ,1° ,y0 FJ Fy FJ FJ FJ FJ FJ FJ Fy FJ FJ FJ F{ FJ FJ FJ FJ Fy FJ FJ FJ FJ FJ FJ FJ FJ Fy FJ F{ FJ F{ o Toll Revenue Interest la Toll Revenue Rincipal 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds, Series A (Current Interest Obligations): In July 2013, the Commission issued $123,825,000 principal amount of serial CIBs to fund a portion of the 91 Project, pay capitalized interest during construction, fund a debt service reserve fund, fund an initial amount for an operations and maintenance fund, and pay issuance costs. lhe CIBs consist of a serial bond maturing on June 1, 2044 in the amount of $39,315,000 at an interest rate of 5.75%and a term bond due on June 1, 2048 in the amount of $84,510,000 with annual sinking funds payments of $42,255,000 on June 1, 2047 and June 1, 2048 at an interest rate of 5.75%. Table 50 summarizes the debt service requirementsforthe 2013 Toll Revenue CIBS. Table 50 —2013 Toll Revenue Current Interest Obligation Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year Principal Interest Total Debt Service 2019 $ $ 7,119,900 $ 7,119,900 2020 7,119,900 7,119,900 2021 7,119,900 7,119,900 2022 7,119,900 7,119,900 2023 - 7,119,900 7,119,900 2024-2028 35,599,500 35,599,500 2029-2033 35,599,500 35,599,500 2034-2038 35,599,500 35,599,500 2039-2043 35,599,500 35,599,500 2044-2048 81,570,000 28,817,700 110,387,700 2049 42,255,000 2,430,700 44,685,700 Total $ 123,825,000 $ 209,245,900 $ 333,070,900 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds, Series A (Capital Appreciation Obligations): In July 2013, the Commission isqaed $52,829,600 principal amount of serial CABs to fund a portion of the 91 Project, pay capitalized interest during construction, fund a debt service reserve fund, fund an initial amount for an operations and maintenance fund, and pay issuance costs. the CABs do not pay current interest as interest iscompounded semiannually and paid at maturity. therefore, the CABs increase in value, or accrete, by the accumulation of such compounded interest from its initial principal amount to the maturity value in installments ranging from $3,440,000 to $34,220,000 on various dates from June 1, 2022 through June 1, 2043. Interest rates and yield to maturity range from 5.30%to 7.15%. Table 51 summarizes the debt service requirements for the 2013 Toll Revenue CABs. Table 51 —2013 Toll Revenue Capital Appreciation Obligation Bonds Debt Service Requirements Fiscal Year Principal Accreted Interest Total Debt Service 2019 $ $ 4,828,700 2020 5,150,800 2021 5,495,300 2022 2,396,706 5,846,900 2023 3,098,100 6,025,400 2024-2028 16,888,400 30,402,200 2029-2033 16,178,300 26,588,000 2034-2038 5,574,500 20,625,200 2039-2043 7,607,000 24,630,700 2044-2048 4,184,800 2,140,600 Total $ 55,927,806 $ 131,733,800 $ 4,828,700 5,150,800 5,495,300 8,243,606 9,123,500 47,290,600 42,766,300 26,199,700 32,237,700 6,325,400 $ 187,661,606 2013 11RA Loan — 91 Project: In July 2013, the Commission executed a 11RA loan of up to $421,054,400 for the 91 Project. In FY 2016/17, the Commission drew down the balance of the TIRA loan for the 91 Project. During construction and for a period of up to five years following substantial completion, interest iscompounded and added to the initial TIF1A loan. The TIRA loan requires mandatory debt service payments at a minimum and scheduled debt service paymentsto the extent additional fundsare available. TIRA debt service paymentscommence on December 1, 2021 through June 1, 2051. The 2013 TIRA Loan interest rate is3.47%. Table 52 presentsmandatory debt service on the 201311RA Loan. Table 52—2013 11FIA Loan (91 Project) Debt Service Requirements Mandatory Fiscal Year Principal Interest Total 2019-2023 $ - $ 3,840,000 2024-2028 - 23,604,000 2029-2033 201,000 73,743,000 2034-2038 97,548,000 81,787,000 2039-2043 99,208,000 61,359,000 2044-2048 177,427,000 41,287,000 2049-2051 128,954,000 6,521,000 Total 503,338,000 $ 292,141,000 Accretion (82,283,600) Initial Loan $ 421,054,400 $ 3,840,000 23,604,000 73,944,000 179,335,000 160,567,000 218,714,000 135,475,000 $ 795,479,000 In connection with the 2013 financing for the 91 Project, the Commission covenanted to deposit amounts with the toll trustee as an equity contribution of $136,451,515 to the 91 Project. In FY 2016/17, the final equity contribution wasfunded by a transfer from the 2009 Measure A Western County New Corridorsfund. 2017 TIRA Loan — 1-15 Express Lanes: In July 2017, the Commission executed the 2017 11RA Loan up to $152,214,260 for the 1-15 Express Lanes project. The Commission requested no draws in FY 2017/18, but it anticipates drawsaggregating $106,081,000 in FY2018/19 on the 2017 TIRA Loan. During construction and fora period of up to five yearsfollowing substantial completion, interest iscompounded and added to the initial TIRA loan. The 2017 TIRA Loan requiresmandatory debt service payments at a minimum and scheduled debt service payment to the extent additional funds are available. TIRA debt service payments are expected to commence on June 1, 2025, which is five years after the projected substantial completion date of the 1-15 Express Lanes project, through June 1, 2053. The interest rate of the 11FIA loan is2.84%. Based on a projected draw schedule, Table 53 presents an estimate of mandatory debt service requirements. Table 53-201771FlA Loan (1-15 Express Lanes) Debt Service Requirements Mandatory Fiscal Year Principal Interest Total 2024-2028 $ - $ 17,738,500 2029-2033 4,057,200 25,241,100 2034-2038 17,654,800 23,995,600 2039-2043 21,685,800 21,057,700 2044-2048 41,077,900 17,179,400 2049-2053 64,774,500 9,804,900 2054-2055 29,206,500 1,251,000 178,456,700 $ 116,268,200 Accretion (26,242,400) Initial Loan $ 152,214,300 $ 17,738,500 29,298,300 41,650,400 42,743,500 58,257,300 74,579,400 30,457,500 $ 294,724,900 Outstanding Debt and Legal Debt Margin at June 30, 2019 Table 54 presentsa summary of the Commission'soutstanding debt secured by Measure A sales tax revenuesand related legal debt margin projected at June 30, 2019: Table 54 —Legal Debt Margin 2009 Measure A Authorized Sales Tax Revenue Debt $ 975,000,000 2010B Bonds 112,370,000 2013 Sales Tax Bonds 54,705,000 2016 Refunding Bonds 69,600,000 2017A Bonds 150,580,000 2017BRefunding Bonds 392,730,000 2018 Refunding Bonds 59,075,000 Total Outstanding Debt 839,060,000 Legal Debt Margin $ 135,940,000 Table 55 - Budget Comparison by Department FY 2017 -2019 FY 16/17 Actual FY 17/ 18 FY 17/ 18 Revised Budget Projected FY 18/ 19 Budget Do Ila r Change Percent Change Revenues Measure A Sales Tax L1FSalesTax STASaIesTax Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Local Reimbursements 1UMFRevenue Tolls, Penalties, and Fees Other Revenue Investment Income Total Revenues Expenditures/Expenses Management Services Executive Management Administration External Affairs Rnance Total Management Services Regional Programs: Flanning and Programming Services Rail Maintenance and Operations Public and Specialized Transit Commuter Assistance Motorist Assistance Total Regional Programs Capital Project Development and Delivery Toll Operations Debt Service Principal Payments Interest Payments Cost of Issuance Total Debt Service Total Expenditures/Expenses Excess(deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures/Brpenses Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers In TransfersOut Debt Proceeds 11FA Loan Proceeds Payment to Escrow Agent Bond Premium Net Fnancing Sources(Uses) Excess(deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Bcpenditures/Expensesand Other Financing Sources (Uses) Beginning Fund Balance $ 175,320,200 $ 181,000,000 $ 88,206,900 91,000,000 6,432,600 10,469,000 20,201,700 78,563,200 8,538,500 16,589,100 3,727,400 6,840,100 19,594,800 22,250,000 10,125, 300 16, 835, 800 6,746,000 2,803,700 4,495,300 3,509,400 181,000,000 91,000,000 20,204,800 105,408,300 8,275,100 7,435,100 22,250,000 42,812,600 574,200 7,595,300 343,388,700 429,860,300 486,555,400 73,200 507,300 391,600 1,615,600 2,619,400 2,280,200 1,428,000 2,194,200 2,158,600 3,518,000 4,549,400 3,186,900 6,634,800 2,541,000 24,298,600 82,798,500 2,686,100 4,177,200 9,870,300 13,007,100 36,283,500 122,719,100 4,143,000 4,693,900 116,501,400 180,846,600 339,435,700 3,039,700 27,317,200 46,705,400 654,000 484,311,900 15,044,200 62,145,000 54,712,600 3,767,200 74, 676, 600 120, 624, 800 540,288,200 810,697,800 8,017,300 6,153,300 29,059,700 104,905,000 3,860,900 4,022,200 148,001,100 335,616,100 12,851,300 62,120,000 54,712,600 2,257,100 119,089,700 623,575,500 (196,899,500) (380,837,500) (137,020,100) 188,488,900 (210,150,600) 106,140,000 143,358,100 (63,900,000) 8,414,000 313,676,500 298,371,800 (313,676,500) (298,371,800) 636,250,000 632,775,000 81,810,000 (546,300,000) (541,889,900) 119,722,000 119, 713, 800 172,350,400 291,482,000 210,598,900 (24,549,100) (89,355,500) 740,421,500 715,872,400 73,578,800 715,872,400 Ending Fund Balance $ 715,872,400 $ 626,516,900 $ 789,451,200 $ 187,000,000 94,000,000 23,203,600 59,105,700 165,442,400 24,037,900 22,922,200 36,940,500 539,000 3,408,000 616,599,300 539,600 2,939,600 2,228,900 4,360,200 10,068,300 19,508,800 36,236,900 160,131,400 4,501,300 6,185,900 226,564,300 550,654,400 17,366,800 25,965,000 50,710,600 76,675,600 881,329,400 (264,730,100) 181,899,300 (181,899,300) 106,081,000 (20,000,000) 86,081,000 (178,649,100) 789,451,200 $ 610,802,100 $ 6,000,000 3,000,000 12,734,600 (19,457,500) 148,853,300 17,197,800 672,200 20,104,700 (2,264,700) (101,400) 186,739,000 32,300 320,200 34,700 (189,200) 198,000 6,501,700 (46,600) 37,412,300 358,300 1,492,000 45,717,700 66,342,500 2,322,600 (36,180,000) (4,002,000) (3,767,200) (43,949,200) 70,631,600 3% 3% 122% -25% 897% 251% 3% 119% -81% -3% 43% 6% 12% 2% -4% 2% 50% 0% 30% 9% 32% 25% 14% 15% -58% -7% -100% -36% 9% 116,107,400 (131,777,200) 131,777,200 (636,250,000) 24,271,000 526,300,000 (119,722,000) (205,401,000) -30% -42% -42% -100% 30% -96% -100% -70% (89,293,600) 1 00% 73,578,800 10% $ (15,714,800) -3% Executive Management Mission Statement: Executive Management maintains the highest level of achievement and professionalism while managing the activities of the Commission to effectuate sound transportation policies, projects and servicesto meet Riverside County'smobility needs. Chart 35—Bcecutive Management alp port Costs —\ 16% Profe ssio na I Costs 43% Expenditures la rie s a nd Be ne fit s 41% Executive Management has a budget of $539,600 (Table 56) for oversight of all Commission functions. the 15% increase in salariesand benefits reflectsthe net allocation of I -Its, an increase to the Commission'scontribution to employee health benefits, and merit -based salary increases. Professional costsof $230,000 include legal feesand consulting servicesfororganizationaItraining. Support costsinclude various membership duesand staff -related travel costsof $88,600. Table 56—Executive Management Expenditure Detail FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Dollar Percent Actual revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change atlariesand Benefits $ 254,600 $ 191,400 $ 191,100 $ 221,000 $ 29,600 15% Professional Costs Le g a I Se ry ices 88,900 175,000 90,000 175,000 0% Professional Services - General (340,900) 50,000 30,000 55,000 5,000 10% Total Professional Costs (252,000) 225,000 120,000 230,000 5,000 2°/u alp port Costs 70,600 90,900 80,500 88,600 (2,300) -3% TOTAL Executive Management $ 73,200 $ 507,300 $ 391,600 $ 539,600 $ 32,300 6°/u Executive Management Staffing Summary Position FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Administrative Assistant 0.05 0.00 Deputy Executive Director 0.08 0.05 Executive Director 0.29 0.11 IT Administrator 0.00 0.05 Senior Administrative Assistant 0.00 0.00 Senior Office Assistant 0.15 0.15 FTE 0.57 0.36 Department Budget Overview Department Description 0.02 0.10 0.32 0.00 0.01 0.15 0.60 The Executive Director isresponsible fordeveloping and implementing new strategiesat the local, regional, and statewide levels to assure delivery of transportation improvements and programs throughout the County. Furthermore, Executive Management iscommitted to fostering a positive and supportive work environment for staff that emphasizes quality work and encourages teamwork and open communication, with a commitment to serving the public. This is accomplished through a productive and collaborative effort with the membersof the Commission and the oversight of the Commission's Executive Committee. Key Assumptions for FY 2018/ 19 • The Executive Director will play a prominent role with external audiencesand an emphasison working with Congress, the California Legislature, Riverside County business organizations, Southern California transportation agencies, and local governments regarding advancing transportation policy in California. Policy concemsinclude the need forongoing transportation investment, flexibility in project delivery methods, streamlining environmental procerrs, and a renewed focus of the connection between transportation projects and the overall quality of life in the County. • Project delivery will be a top priority in FY2018/19 with construction proceeding on the I-15— a project that travels through the cities of Jurupa Valley, Eastvale, Norco and Corona. This project will construct an additional two -tolled express lanes in each direction between SR60 and Cajalco Road. • Advancement of other large scale projects will take place including completion of the environmental permit process on the SR79 realignment project and resolving litigation regarding the SR60 truck climbing lanesand Mid County Parkway. • The Commission will complete a study to addressthe impact of truck traffic serving large-scale logisticsfacilities. The study could lead to the creation of fee program to mitigate the impact of trucksthat serve these facilities. • Promoting the use of public transit will be an important Commission priority which will include marketing of the PVL Metrolink extension and express bus service that utilizes the 91 Express Lanes. • There will be a continued focus on enhanced cost-effective Metrolink and Los Angeles -San Diego -San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) Rail Corridorservice along with continuing development of a Service Development Plan (SDP) and environmental document for intercity rail service forthe Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Passcorridor. • The advancement of projectswill require a requisite increase in public outreach fortraditional and social media. This will be part of an effort to enhance awareness of the Commission's activities and service to the public at large, including updating the Commission'swebsite to be more informative, easierto use, and compatible with mobile devices. " As part of a regionwide effort, the Commission will work with local governments and stakeholdersto advance active transportation projectssuch asbicycling, walking, and transit use " The Commission will remain an active participant in a concerted statewide effort to seek and protect transportation funding  most notably implementing and advocating projects, such asthe 71/91 interchange project, to be funded by SB 1, the state gastax increase approved in April 2017. " The Commission will continue preconstruction activitiesforthe 15/91 ExpressLanesconnector project, which received funding from SB 132. " The Commission will also coordinate the implementation of other SB 132-funded Riverside County Transportation Efficiency Corridorprojectswith the respective lead agenciesto ensure timely completion. Accomplishments in FY 2017/ 18 FY2017/18 witnegmd extraordinary accomplishmentsat the Commission, placing it in the top tier of California transportation organizations. In several areas, the Commission stood by itself in successful advocacy, innovation, and leadership. " Successfully operated the RCTC 91 Express Lanessince their opening in March 2017. " Accepted the completion of the design -build contract to close out the 91 Project. " Launched additional traffic studies on the SR-91 corridor to improve congestion hot spots located at the two end pointsof the RCTC 91 ExpressLanesand on the direct connectorfrom 1-15to the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. " Improved ridership on the Metrolink PVL extension through additional marketing and a discount program. " Led implementation of Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass Corridor Rail Study and obtained FRA funding grant for next phase; " Participated in continued efforts to seek funding and approvals for special event trains for Coachella and Stagecoach festivals. " Continued engineering and right of way acquisition for first phase of Mid County Parkway while defending against litigation to challenge the project. " Completed property acquisitionson the SR60 truck climbing lane project. " Continued effortsto ensure interagency reviewsand progressof SR79 realignment, including environmental permits. " Completed financing, including a TIRALoan, forthe 1-15 ExpressLanesproject  allowing early design -build and toll %rvicesprovidercontract activitiesto begin. " Successfully refinanced $410 million in existing debt to save more than $52 million overthe next 21 years. " Issued fixed rate debt to refinance $70.8 million of variable rate debt and terminate an interest rate swap  providing more certainty asto future debt service costs. " Actively engaged in statewide advocacy efforts regarding legislation impacting transportation funding, process, and/or programs and in federal transportation policy development. " Actively engaged in Metrolink budget, operations, and service discussionsto ensure increased service for Riverside County Metrolink usersand to effectively manage administrative costs. " Focused on collaborative effortswith othertransportation agenciesincluding Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), Sunline, SBCTA, OCTA, WRCOG, CVAG, SLAG, and Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA). " Engaged with member agency staff to ensure open communication and dialogue particularly regarding funding issues; provided project delivery support and advice to member agencies; and supported effortsto develop subregional priorities. " Partnered with Caltrans management at District 8 and headquartersto maintain progresson initiativesand projects. " Continued to fund the acquisition of needed habitat for the Western Riverside County Multi - Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MS-1CP) as outlined in the 2009 Measure A Expenditure Plan. Major Initiatives in FY 2018/ 19 FY2018/19 will mark the active construction of yet another majortoll facility project. Much like the recently -completed 91 Project, the 1-15 Express Lanes project will be delivered via a design -build contract which results in significant time savingsfor the delivery of the work. Unlike the 91 Project, the 1-15 Express Lanes project effort will be located primarily in the center median of the existing freeway and will not require extensive right of way acquisitions. Construction impacts to the community will be much lesspronounced. the Commission isnow a toll road operatorwith new responsibilitiesfor maintenance, operations, debt service, and marketing of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes, which opened in March 2017. the responsibilitieswill expand in 2020 with the opening of the 1-15 Express Lanes and in 2022 with the opening of the 15/91 Express Lanesconnectorfrom the 91 ExpressLanesto the northern segment of 1-15. In looking toward the future, the Commission is conducting a long-range transportation plan to guide future transportation prioritiesfor the County. lhe technical work and public outreach for the plan will be completed by a consultant by the end of the calendar year in anticipation of Commission approval in January 2019. In addition to the technical work, the success of many of the efforts will rely on proactive extemal communications. While traditional media relations will continue to be used, the Commission will continue implementation of a comprehensive social media outreach program to build awarenessof the Commission and its role in the community. A key part of this effort includes completion of a revamped website that will be easierto use, more informative, and compatible with mobile devices. An expanding and systematic outreach to businessand civic groups, focusing on Commission efforts in terrns of funding, construction, and services, will be the central feature of the communications program. Project development work isalso an important priority and continuesforthe Mid County Parkway, SR79 realignment, and SR60 truck climbing lane projects. Regarding public transit, the Commission will continue alternatives analysis and planning efforts to advance the goal of additional pas-Pngerrailservice to serve the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass rail corridor. A federal grant from the FRA supportsthe second phase of the project to develop an environmental impact report and conceptual service plan. Asa member of Metrolink, funding and providing public transit connectionsfor commutersis an important priority for the Commission. the Commission funded and completed construction on the PVL extension in 2016. While ridership on that line is steadily growing, a continued marketing and discount ticket effort will take place during the year. the Commission istaking an active role throughout the County to advance active transportation projectsforbicyclistsand pedestrians. Working in partnership with the District, the Commission will continue to provide project delivery support services for Santa Ana River Trail projects. lie Commission will also advocate and support funding of the CV Link project in the Coachella Valley. the focuson the type of projects remainsconsistent with southern California's RIP which seeks to limit GHG emissions. In termsof advancing policy, a major concern in moving forward isthe State'sfinancial position and commitment to funding infrastructure and transportation. the Commission will continue to take an aggressive and active role in protecting existing transportation funding and advocating for State investments in transportation. the April 2017 approval of SB 132 to fund five key transportation projects in Riverside County, was achieved thanks to the work of State Senator Richard Roth and Aucomblywoman Sabrina Cervantes, who worked closely with Board commissionersand staff. lhe Commission isan active member of the Self -Help Counties Coalition (SHCC), California Association of Councils of Governments(CALCOG), and Mobility 21; a major focus of these organizations will be placed on advocacy to educate the public regarding the impact of SB1 —a bill which raised state gastaxesand vehicle feesto fund transportation priorities. Federal funding is also an important issue for the Commission's future, and the Commission will play an active role in allocating and competing for funding which has been made available by the current transportation bill, Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act). With a potential new emphasis on infrastructure investment being made by the Executive Branch, the Commission will work closely with Congressional members and the U.S. DOT should new opportunitiesarise forfunding on the federal front. While actively participating in all of these major endeavors, the Executive Director will maintain and improve administrative efficiency and fiscally sound practices characteristic of the Commission. With 51 staff positions included in the FY 2018/19 budget, the Commission's organization remainsconsistent with the Commission'sdirection. the Commission must continue to be competitive in the employment market and retain capable staff as well as attract high quality applicants. Staff training development and succession planning will continue, enabling our small and dedicated staff to enhance skills, productivity, and value. the Commission'sgoal isto maintain the most effective mid -sized transportation agency in Califomia. Department Goals Focus on timely and effective completion of capital projects and implementation of needed transportation services. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Responsible Partner) Objectives: • Successfully manage financial responsibilities and investments for the RCTC 91 Express Lanesasa toll operator. • Continue implementation of Toll Program management strategy with active construction of the 1-15 Express Lanes project and development of the 15/91 Express Lanes connector project. • Provide successful Metrolink service and bolster ridership on the PVL extension. • Adopt the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) to establish integrated transportation visionsand priorities. • Continue progress and outreach for Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail service study. • Complete the logisticsrelated truck -impact study. • Actively seek resolution of litigation challenging the Mid County Parkway and SR60 truck climbing lane projectsso that work can progressto the next phase. • Maintain Metrolink coordination and engage in collaborative effortsto addresssignificant funding and organizational challenges. • Continue engagement in rail discussionsregarding Metrolink, LOSSAN, and high-speed rail to ensure protection of Riverside service and the Commission's rights. • Support CVAG'stransportation initiativesand projects. • Continue to support RTA'sexpressbusservice in itsoperational plans. • Continue collaboration with member agencieson planning, funding and construction of local and regional bike, trail, and pedestrian facilities. • Update Transit Vision to add ress long-term transit funding challenges. " Implement the Commission'sadopted state and federal legislative platforms. " Pursue all funding opportunitiesto keep projectsfunded. " Ensure the Commission'sactive participation in RIP implementation. " Place a high priority in working with neighboring counties in San Bernardino, Orange, and San Diego to addresscommuting needsthat impact highway and transit facilities. " Continue collaborative efforts with local agencies regarding priorities; communicate effectively and timely with community groupsand leaders. " Launch a new vanpool program to provide a new and flexible commute. Maximize funding fortransportation improvements in Riverside County through legislative advocacy. (Policy Goals Quality of Life) Objectives: " Place an emphasis on implementing federally authorized and funded projects and services that are consistent with the federal transportation bill and the Commission'songoing project p riorities. " Continue to advocate for federal investment in freight and goods movement infrastructure with the goal of mitigating community impacts while increasing capacity and local job creation and economic development. " Advocate for additional funding from the state's Cap and Trade programs for projects in Riverside County. " Pursue S31 funding of discretionary programs. Support regional transportation solutions in cooperation with surrounding counties that are of benefit to Riverside County. (Policy Goals Quality of Life, Operational Excellence, Responsible Partner) Objectives: " Partner with OCTA on the administration and operation of the 91 Express Lanes in both counties. " Work with neighboring counties regarding corridor improvementson SR91 and 1-15. " Maintain an effective working relationship with the agenciesthat comprise Metrolinkto ensure that the County commuter rail needsare served in an efficient, effective, and safe manner. " Partner with SBCTA to enhance and publicize the Inland Empire Commuter (IE Commuter) system and work with agencies in San Diego, Orange, and Los Angeles counties to provide effective, regional511 traveler information services. " Play an active role in the implementation of intercity rail and commuter rail service in the LO SSA N ra i I corridor. " Be an active participant in discussions involving high-speed rail, especially concerning connectivity investments in the overall rail system in southern California. " Advocate for and take an active effort for additional intercity rail service to the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Passcorridor. Maintain effective working relationships with Commissioners to strengthen and expand the Commission's leadership in transportation policy decision -making at all levels of govemment and raise the Commission's profile in the community. (Policy Goal: Quality of Life, Operational Excellence) Objectives: " Facilitate Commissioner participation at the regional, state, and federal levels to raise the interestsof the Commission and seek favorable action. " Continue regularcommunication between the Executive Director, seniorstaff, and the Board. " Continue collaborative effortswith memberagencystaff regarding local prioritiesand funding challenges. " Work with other levels of local government such as the County's Transportation and Land Management Agency, County Health Department, District, and local universitieson quality of life issuesthat are connected to transportation such asairquality and the environment. " Provide assistance to Commissioners who serve on outside boards such asSCAG, Metrolink, LOSSAN, and the Mobile Sources Air Pollution Review Committee (MSRC) to assist their efforts to represent the County. " Upgrade the Commission's website to be easier to use, more informative, and compatible with mobile devices. Promote the Commission's effectiveness by improving and developing staff skills, using state-of-the-art working tools, and fostering an environment that encourages and rewa rds individua I and team effort. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: " Make needed investmentsin information technology to ensure staff efficiency. " Continue to maintain a well -documented employee appraisal process that provides clear, understandable, and measurable performance criteria for all employees. " Maintain and encourage staff morale and seek continuous improvement of staff effectiveness. " Retain quality staff and evaluate staff retention strategiesand options. " Complete and implement organizational initiatives. Develop the framework for a Commission culture that enhances productivity, encourages regular and open communication among staff, and promotes the mutual achievement of individual and organizational goals and objectives. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objective: " Facilitate open communicationsand coordination between management, professional staff, and support staff through regular meetings. Executive Management Performance/Workload Indicators FY 16/ 17 Estimated FY 16/ 17 Actual FY 17/ 18 Estimated FY 18/ 19 Projected Expenditures/Expenses $541,439,300 $540,288,200 $623,575,500 $881,329,400 Staffing levels 49 47 50 51 Administration costs as percentage of expenditures 1.23% 1.22% 1.29% 1.14% Administration Mission Statement: Comprised of office operations, clerk of the board, and human resources, Administration provides quality and efficient services to the Board of Commissioners, staff, and external customers in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Chart 36 —Administration Capital Outlay 10% aipport Costs 35% Expenditures Salaries and Benefits 29% Professional Costs 26% As noted in Table 57, the Administration Department's total budget is $2,939,600 for office operations including management of office space, lease, and equipment; records; Commission and committee meetings; and special events as well as for the clerk of the board and human resourcesfunctions. Salaries and benefits expenditures of $755,700 reflect an increase of 60% related to the net allocation of FIEs, an increase to the Commission'scontribution to employee health benefits, and merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $667,100 cover various services including, but not limited to, Commissioners' per diem, legal fees, and consultant and other professional services and reflects an increase of 25%. Support costs of $986,800 cover administrative overhead including office maintenance; information technology updates, support, and maintenance; and recruitments. Capital outlay of $530,000 covers office space improvements, information technology support services, and equipment upgrades. Table 57-Administration Bcpenditure Detail FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change sslariesand Benefits Professional Costs Commissioner Per Diem Legal cervices Professional cervices -General Total Professional Costs alp port Costs Capital Outlay Debt Service lOTALAdministration $ 585,500 $ 473,600 $ 473,300 55,300 24,400 206,200 65,000 32,000 436,500 60,000 27,500 430,900 285,900 533,500 518,400 656,800 977,300 763,500 87,400 635,000 525,000 24,900 $ 1,640,500 $ 2,619,400 $ 2,280,200 $ 755,700 65,000 28,000 574,100 667,100 986,800 530,000 $ 2,939,600 Administration Staffing Summary Position FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Administrative Assistant 0.14 0.15 Clerk of the Board 1.00 1.00 Deputy Clerk of the Board 1.00 1.00 Executive Director 0.00 0.04 Facilities Administrator 0.00 0.00 Human Resources Administrator 1.00 1.00 IT Administrator 0.00 0.46 Procurement Analyst 0.01 0.00 Records Technician 1.00 1.00 Senior Administrative Assistant 0.00 0.01 Senior Management Analyst 0.00 0.03 Senior Office Assistant 0.59 0.55 FTE 4.74 5.24 Department Budget Overview - Office Operations Department Description 0.08 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.10 1.00 0.87 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 5.64 $ 282,100 60% 0% (4,000) -13% 137,600 32% 133,600 25% 9,500 1 % (105,000) -17% N/A $ 320,200 12% Office Operationsoverseesthe daily maintenance needsof the Commission'soffice facilitiesand staff; manages information technology and records management systems; oversees the office lease with the County; purchases office supplies and equipment; posts public notices on the website and local newspaper; maintains a safe working environment for Board members, staff, and consultants; and providessupport services. Key Assumptions for FY 2018/ 19 • Support will be provided to 51 full-time Commission staff at the Commission's Riverside office and other project -related facilities. • Information technology staff in coordination with an information technology consultant will maintain the Commission's investments in a state of good repair to ensure efficient and effective operations. • The Commission will maintain an accurate and efficient recordsmanagement system. • Staff will respond to requests for public records in accordance with the California Public RecordsAct. Accomplishments in FY 2017/ 18 • Executed a new lease with the County that includes additional office space for co -location of staff and capital program management in Riverside. " Maintained a disaster recovery plan to ensure uninterrupted Commission operations. " Responded to public recordsrequestsin accordance with the California Public RecordsAct. " Posted legal noticeson the website and in local newspapersin a timely manner. " Maintained a records management system to ensure accurate and efficient processing of incoming and outgoing correspondence and documents. Major Initiatives in FY 2018/ 19 The Commission will invest in a new records management system in order to achieve greater efficiencies and strengthen the Commission's records management processes and procedures. The system pertainsto the management, storage, and accessibility of the Commission's actions and documentsand the retention capability for incoming and internally created records. Office Operationswill continue to provide high quality support servicesto the Board and to internal and external customersby providing a work environment that enhancesthe overall mission of the Commission. The Commission moved to its current office in Riverside in 2002. In connection with the expansion of the office space to co -locate staff and capital program management, the Commission will complete an update of the office and workspacesto provide a productive and efficient environment in a prudent and economical manner. Department Goal  OfFce Operations Ensure quality service that demonstrates responsiveness and flexibility and provides services at the most reasonable cost. (Policy Goals: Operational Excellence) Objectives: " aipport 51 full-time Commission staff. " Manage the Commission'sinformation technology systems. " Continue to improve administrative efficiency through automation of records processing. " Post legal noticeson the Commission'swebsite and in the newspaperson a timely basis and in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations. " Provide office supplies, equipment, and services consistent with intended quality and capabilitiesat the most advantageousprice afforded in the market. Facilitate access to Commission information and records. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: " Respond to requests for records and information on a timely basis and in accordance with state law. " Continue to improve the Commission's recordkeeping practices by updating the electronic recordsmanagement system. " Maintain Commission agreements, amendments, MOUs, resolutions, and ordinances. Department Budget Overview  Clerk of the Board Department Description The Clerk of the Board providessupport servicesto the Board of Commissionersand itsalternates and for Commission and committee meetings. It serves as an important resource for the Commission and hasthe responsibility for: " Recording, publishing, preserving, and filing meeting proceedingsof documentsacted upon by the Commission and itscommittees; " Processing claimsagainst the Commission; " Fulfilling requirements of the Commission and the committees as it relates to the Conflict of Interest Code; " Serving as the Fling Officer for Economic Interest and Campaign Disclosure statements and legal claimsagainst the Commission; " Coordinating Commission special eventsand meetings; and " Performing all duties required by law, rules, ororderof the Board. Assuch,thisdepartment hasa direct link and responsibility to serve local taxpayersand the public while supporting the actions of the Commission. lhe need to be accountable to the public at large is further amplified by the need to comply with federal and state law requiring prompt responsesto California Public RecordsAct requests. Key Assumptions for FY 2018/ 19 " the Clerk of the Board will provide staff support and meeting servicesto 34Commissionersand their alternates, the Commission, standing committees, and a number of ad hoc committees. " Staff will publish and distribute monthly agenda packets and supporting documents in accordance with the Brown Act. " lhe Clerk of the Board will keep officers and members of the Commission informed by providing them with the most current and accurate data to assist them and facilitate their decision -making responsibilities. " Frequent communication with Commissioners will continue in order to provide news and updateson Commission itemsand transportation -related meetings. " Available technology will be used to provide simplified access of agenda items and Commission actionsto the public, local agencies, and staff. Accomplishments in FY 2017/ 18 " Updated the web page and the bulletin board for the agenda, minutes, and supporting documents. " Regularly advised officers and members of the Commission and their staff on changes to Commission meetingsand othertransportation-related meetings. " Arranged Commission and committee meetingsand special eventsof the Commission. " Proce,rd and transmitted Commission -approved resolutions to appropriate agencies in a timely manner. " Implemented NetFle to enable the electronic submission of Form 700 Statement of Economic Interest filings. Major Initiatives in FY 2018/ 19 Each year, local agenciesmake changesto theirappointmentsregarding theirrepresentation on the Commission. Staff will continue to ensure that the newly appointed representatives, aswell as their respective staff, are aware of operational policies of the Commission and other transportation -related meetings. there will be continued emphasis on the utilization of electronic mail with Commissionersfor more efficient communications. Clerk of the Board staff will continue to provide high quality support servicesto the Board. Staff will also continue to update technology to streamline procermsand proceduresforeasieraccessto Commission actions, minutes, resolutions, and ordinances, including electronic agenda distribution. Department Goals —Clerk of the Board Ensure coordination and documentation of Commission and committee meetings and provide public accessibility to agenda items as required by state regulations. (Policy Goals: Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Provide accurate, high quality agenda packetsfor Commission and committee meetings. • Continue to provide support to Commission members, staff, and attendees of Commission and committee meetings. • Post meeting agendas and supporting documents in compliance with Brown Act requirements. • Maintain an accurate list of Commissioners and alternates and submit membership roster changesto the Secretary of State. • Maintain and file all Commission and committee meetings and official records of the Commission. • Perform all dutieswithin mandated deadlines. • Maintain and promote good Commission and staff relations. Facilitate access to Commission meetings and activities. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Implement an agenda program that iscompatible with a new recordsmanagement system and other Commission software. • Coordinate special activities, meetings, events, and conferences as requested by the Executive Director and the Commission. Department Budget Overview — Human Resources Department Description Human Resourcesresponsibilitiesinclude: • Planning, administering, and implementing human resources programs, including the recruitment, selection, and appraisal process; employee training and development; classification and compensation studies; benefitsadministration; employee relations; and • Recommending, implementing and maintaining personnel policies, procedures, and practices. Key Assumptions for FY 2018/ 19 • Staff will maintain quality service levels in all Human Resources programs. • lhe a‘vesN lent of Human Resourcespolicies, practicesand procedureswill continue. • Continuous improvement in communication with employees regarding Human Resources information will be an ongoing process. • the Commission will comply with state and federal labor law regulations. Accomplishments in FY 2017/ 18 • Maintained the employee performance appraisal system. • Conducted annual benefitsopen enrollmentswith all employees. • Updated the personnel policiesand proceduresmanual. " Regularly provided information to employeeson changesto health insurance, 401(a) defined contribution, and 457 deferred compensation plans and the personnel policies and proceduresmanual through the Commission'sintranet. " Recruited and filled two interns, five temporary employees, five staff promotions, four service retirements, and six new hires in full-time positions. " Coordinated training sessionson businesswriting, intermediate and advanced Microsoft Excel, presentations skills, effective communications, and prevention of violence in the workplace training forstaff aswell assexual harassment prevention training for managers. " Disclosed employees' compensation on the Commission's website in compliance with the State Controller's Office and CaIPERS. " Created a new job description for the Information Technology Administrator and revised job descriptionsfor Clerk of the Board and Public Affairs Manager. Major Initiatives in FY 2018/ 19 Human Resourcesfocuseson managing employeesand consistsof a framework of activitiesand practices that support and develop a motivated workforce while at the same time complying with legislation and regulations that govern the employer/employee relationship and ensuring parameters for fair and consistent decision -making and good workplace practices. Staff uses written position descriptions and performance expectations in order to obtain a clear and consistent understanding of what isexpected. Department Goals  Human Resources Administer human resources policies, procedures, and programs in order to align personnel laws and the Commission's policies with continuous improvement principles. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: " Review and update personnel policies and procedures to comply with federal and state requirements. " Provide information to enhance the employee'sknowledge of current personnel policiesand proceduresin variousformsincluding electronic access, workshops, and printed information. " Ensure that employee personnel records are documented and updated timely for various personnel actions. Continue to employ and recruit a dynamic and talented workforce. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: " Maintain a compensation program that ensures internal equity and external competitiveness within the pay structure for Commission employees. " Exercise care in making high -quality, diverse appointmentsto fill staff positions. " Maintain a comprehensive new employee orientation program. Develop people to be their best in order to meet the needs of the organization. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: " Build and maintain an effective performance system to include timely performance evaluations, personal development, and a supportive work environment. " Provide appropriate and timely training to meet the demands of the organization and professional growth and development of all staff members. " Fosterteamwork through cooperative effortsand support for shared success. Understand and consistently deliver excellent customer service to all employees. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Focus on "employee as customer" and consistently strive to exceed expectations by supporting and maintaining individual respect, appreciation, management accessibility, and communication. • Determine system requirementsand identify optionsforan employee intranet. • Assist employeesin utilizing employer -provided benefitsto enhance their health, wellness, and quality of life. Improve the quality of the work culture. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Develop and maintain a safe and healthy working environment by retaining open lines of communication throughout the organization; complying with established federal, state, and local regulations; and implementing best practicesto promote safety and prevent legal risks. • Provide a safe working environment with the maintenance of an injury and illness prevention program. • Maintain a proactive employee relations process by facilitating a collaborative, professional working environment with all staff members. • Promote a work/family balance. • Recognize and reward individual contributions, innovation, and learning from experience. Administration Performance/Workload Indicators FY 16/ 17 Estimated FY 16/ 17 Actual FY 17/ 18 Estimated FY 18/ 19 Projected 2 Employee rules/ Benefits review sessions held 2 2 2 Recruitments 7 7 6 5 Positionsfilled 7 2 6 5 Legal notices 26 31 25 30 Commission/Committee/Ad Hoc meetings 45 50 47 50 Commissionerssupported (including altemates) 62 62 62 62 Staff supported: Regularfull-time 49 47 50 51 ate ma I Affa irs M issio n Statement: External Affairs communicates, engages in, and develops relationships with the public, key stakeholders, and governmental decision -makers to connect the lives of Riverside County residents. Chart 37 - Exte ma I Affairs aapport Costs 19%-N Pro fe ssio n a I Costs 45% 8alariesand Benefits 36% Expenditures lhe External Affairs Department hasa total budget of$2,228,900 (Table 58), an overa112%increase. Salaries and benefits reflect a decrease of 7%related to net changes in F1'Es, an increase to the Commission's contribution to employee health benefits, and merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $1,003,400 includes legislative advocacy, graphic design, and website updates. Legislative advocacy costs remain unchanged from FY 2017/18. Overall, professional costsreflect a decrease of 12%due to anticipated completion of the new RCTC.org website and restructuring of contracts for integrated communication services. S.ipport costs of $412,400 include advertising, various membership dues, subscriptions to business software products and journalistic publications. Sltpport costs also include staff -related travel costs, which remain at flat levels, to Sacramento, Washington, D.C., and professional conferences. Support costs reflect a 127%increase primarily due to planned public engagement and education effortsundertaken at the Commission's direction, a large component of which may include social media and online marketing, as well as restarting the Commission's Annual Report distributed to the citizens of Riverside County. Table 58 - External Affairs Expenditure Detail FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits Pro fe ssio n a I Costs Legalrvices Professional services- General Total Professional Costs &wort Costs TOTAL Ext e rna I Affairs $ 654,200 $ 877,100 $ 876,400 $ 813,100 $ (64, 000) -7% 45,000 41,500 41,500 41,500 0% 641,900 1,094,000 1,064,000 961,900 (132,100) -12% 686,900 1,135,500 1,105,500 1,003,400 (132,100) -12% 86,900 181,600 176,700 412,400 230,800 127% $ 1,428,000 $ 2,194,200 $ 2,158,600 $ 2,228,900 $ 34,700 2% Exte ma I Affa irs Staffing Summary Position FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Administrative Assistant 0.68 0.40 Deputy Executive Director 0.72 0.40 External Affairs Director 0.91 0.95 IT Administrator 0.00 0.06 Legislative Affairs Manager 0.87 0.00 Procurement Analyst 0.21 0.05 Procurement Manager 0.00 0.05 Public Affairs Manager 0.50 0.45 Senior Management Analyst 0.72 1.42 Senior Office Assistant 0.26 0.00 FTE 4.87 3.78 Department Budget Overview Department Description 0.45 0.55 0.66 0.00 0.89 0.12 0.00 0.25 0.76 0.00 3.68 The External Affairs Department managestwo core functions: legislative affairsand public affairs. These are public -facing functions with high impact on how citizens, stakeholders, and decision- makersinteract with the Commission. Legislative Affairs Improved mobility for Riverside County residentsrequiresthe financial resourcesand public policy to implement transportation projectsand programs. Through proactive advocacy at all levelsof government, the Commission exercises leadership to advance the agenda of Riverside County taxpayers. The Commission's legislative engagement takes many forms including, but not limited to: • Seeking specific itemsin state orfederal budgets; • Changing the law; • Shaping rulesand regulations; • Educating elected, appointed, and career government officials, as well as interest groups; and • Pursuing grant funds. Coverage of the many policy and funding issues that affect mobility within Riverside County requires a team approach. The Commission's historically effective and savvy approach to legislative advocacy isconsistent with the Commission'soverall theme of a lean staff and utilizing consultantsin theirareasof expertise. The Commission retainslegislative consultantswith decades of experience on transportation policy and funding based in Washington, D.C. and Sacramento, providing day-to-day representation and insights that help guide staff. The consultants, often referred to as legislative advocates or lobbyists, are procured every few years through a competitive and transparent processthat weksto acquire the greatest talent and the best value for the Commission. The FY2018/19 budget does not contemplate any increases in retainer fees for legislative consulting services, as the 2016 procurement of these consultants yielded level overall feescompared to FY2017/18. Staff, in consultation with the legislative advocates, provides recommendations and support to Commissioners, who set legislative policy priorities and are often the Commission's most effective advocates in Washington, D.C. and Sacramento. Commissioner engagement takes the form of actions such as adopting a legislative platform; taking positions on individual bills; and communicating with government decision -makers in writing, verbally, or through physical tripsto capital cities. lhus, the Commission'steam approach for legislative advocacy isbest likened to a three-legged stool held up by Commissioners, professional staff, and professional legislative consultants. An essential component of the Commission's legislative affairs program is participation in formal and informal coalitions of similarly -interested agencies and stakeholders. Examples of formal coalitionsare: • Mobility 21 —a coalition of public agencies, the Automobile Club of Southern California, and businessadvocacy groupsin southern California; • SHCC —an alliance of all California countieswith voter -approved salestaxesfortransportation projects; • CALCOG —a diverse alliance of transportation and planning agenciesthat are impacted by the State'slawsand regulationson land use, air quality, and transportation; • California Toll Operators Committee (CTOC) — an industry group of tolling agencies that collaborate on mattersof common interest pertaining to operations, technology, finance and public policy; and • International Bridge,Tunnel, and Turnpike Association —an industry group of public and private stakeholdersin the tolling industry that focuseson federal policy and developing best business practiceswithin the tolling community. Although participation in these coalitions requires staff and consultant time, they leverage the collective strength of more voices beyond the Commission, which is often necessary to affect policy change. Additionally, members of these coalitions may have expertise and resources outside of the Commission's current capability that can contribute significant value to the Commission. FY2018/19bringsthe possibility of a majorsetbackfortransportation in California and a potentially significant step forward in Washington, D.C. Staff in the External Affairs Department will educate Riverside County residentsabout the importance of transportation funding to the Commission and itsmemberagencies' abilitiesto deliverneeded transportation improvements. Additionally, active engagement by the Commission in the development and implementation of significant federal infrastructure legislation will be necessary to ensure Riverside County taxpayers receive a proportional benefit to any federal investment. Moreover, implementation of the federal FASTAct will continue, meaning significant rulemakings and release of grant funding opportunities are anticipated. A key recommendation of the RCTC Strategic Assessment is for the Commission to pursue state and federal funding for priority projects, given the yawning gap of funding for Riverside County's long-term mobility needs. In pursuit of executing this recommendation, the Commission developed an on -call grant writing bench comprised of four highly qualified firms. lhisbench was utilized in FY2017/18to pursue competitive state funding from S31 and will continue to be called upon in FY2018/19 and beyond to pursue additional competitive grant funding opportunities. Public Affairs RCTC'scommitment to engage and educate residents, businessoperators, and motoristsrequires a comprehensive public affairs program. The Commission is continuing to develop relationships with the public and majorstakeholdersthrough many channels, including: • Participation in or hosting public meetings; • Interacting with communities of interest and stakeholder groups, such as chambers of commerce, industry associations, service clubs, and other community -based organizations and businesses; • Production and provision of resource materials, such asfact sheets, brochures, and newsletters in print and digital form; • Maintenance and enhancement of RCTC.org and support to other Commission project - related websites; • Media communicationsin all varieties, including newsreleases, radio and television interviews, advertisements, cable television recordings, social media outreach, and video production; • Public education programs to increase awareness of RCTC projects and services and to explain the challengesof transportation funding; • Annual reportsto the citizensof Riverside County; and • Analysis of public affairs activitiesto determine the most effective meansof reaching various stakeholders. The Commission will place continued emphasis on providing communications support to major projects, such as the 1-15 Express Lanes project, Mid County Parkway, SR79 realignment, Santa Ana River Trail, 91/Perris Valley Line passenger marketing, and Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Passcorridor rail service. The Commission also will continue to promote high -value public services provided by the Commission, such asFSPand other motorist and commuterassistance programs. Operation Lifesaverisa well -received and effective public education campaign provided by the Commission. Operation Lifesaver teaches target audiences, especially schoolchildren and their families, how to remain safe around train tracks, with the goal of reducing injuries and fatalities associated with trains. The Commission's communications efforts will also focus on marketing and customer service for Metrolink commuter rail service, the 91 Express Lanes, and the future 1-15 Express Lanes. The Commission hasa vested interest in ensuring positive experiencesby the public with these rail and toll services. A majoremphasisforthe Commission isincreased digital communications. The FY2018/19 budget will include major investments to improve the Commission's engagement in online and mobile communications with its customers and constituents. The public can expect to continue to see changes and adaptations of the Commission's information mechanisms, such as The Point, the Commission'snew e-newsletterand blog; RCTC.org, the Commission'swebsite; and social media accounts. The public can also expect a robust engagement initiative to ascertain public priorities and provide information on how the Commission is exercising stewardship over taxpayer dollars. The RCTC Strategic Anossment and recent actions by the Commission at the January 2018 Commission Workshop moved the Commission on a path to potentially seek new local revenues for transportation projects, necessitating public feedback and meaningful engagement with communitiesof interest throughout Riverside County. RCTC will support itsinternal staff effortswith its marketing and public outreach consultants, as well as other consultant services to help the public understand the complexities of transportation funding and the $12.8 billion shortfall that RCTC facesforthe delivery of projectsthrough 2039. Key Assumptions for FY 2018/ 19 • The Commission will continue to implement recommendations of the RCTC Strategic Assessment. • The Commission will engage in a multi -faceted public engagement effort to ascertain transportation prioritiesand needsof Riverside County residentsand stakeholders. • Californians will uphold SB 1, the $5.2 billion transportation funding package pasted by the Legislature and signed by Govemor Brown in April2017. • Congressand the Trump Administration will continue to focuson infrastructure funding. • The Commission will remain an engaged party in public policy and funding matters at the state and federal levels. • Toll operations on the RCTC 91 Express Lanes and future 1-15 Express Lanes will necessitate focused attention on public affairsand marketing regarding the new expresslanes. • Construction of the 1-15 ExpressLanesproject aswellasthe advancement of otherCommission projectswill require ongoing public outreach and engagement. • The Extema 1 Affa irsDepa rtment will work internally to inform, coordinate, and support initiatives acrossall Commission departmentsto ensure a high level of collaboration and cohesiveness, especially related to external -facing work products. • The External Affairs Department will carry out an intensive overall work program, consistent with the reorganization that took place in FY 2017/18, under the leadership of the External AffairsDirectorwith guidance from the Deputy Executive Director and Executive Director. Accomplishments in FY 2017/ 18 Legislative Affairs • Guided Commission -sponsored legislation Asq.mbly Bill (AB) 1189 (Garcia) to approval by the Legislature and Governor, enabling the Commission to consider a sales tax supplemental to Measure A. • Supported the 1-15 ExpressLanesproject team and Finance Department in obtaining the TIFIA loan to fund the project. • Collaborated with SLAG, Metrolink, and other southern California transportation commissions to communicate critical potential impacts in the federal tax reform legislation pagnod in December 2017and lobby forchanges. • Guided the pursuit of two competitive grant applications seeking more than $100 million of funding for two priority projects: 1-15 Railroad Canyon Road interchange and 71/91 interchange improvement. • Authored numerouslettersof correspondence to governmental decision-makersdetailing the Commission's positions. • Participated in advocacy by coalitionsof which the Commission isa member. • Partnered with local business advocacy groups on advocacy tripsto Washington, D.C. and Sacramento. • Provided technical assistance and policy briefingsto legislatorsrepresenting Riverside County. Public A ffa irs • Expanded the Commission'ssocial media program on multiple platforms. • Continued updatesto the Commission'swebsite, RCTC.org, to meet modern standards and expectations, creating a more transparent and accessible platform forcustomersto receive information about multiple transportation projectsand services. • Completed a visual identity audit to establish a consistent and high quality brand for all Commission projectsand programsbeing delivered forthe taxpayers. • Continued the Operation Lifesaver rail safety program throughout the County. • Hosted informational booths and tables and a variety of community events throughout the County. • Publicized the 91/Perris Valley Line and special rail service to the Mission Inn Festival of Lights and supported school and seniorcentertourson public transit and other similar efforts. • Supported the 91 Project team by actively communicating with stakeholders, local businesses, and the public at -large regarding construction activitiesand operationsof the new toll lanes and the general purpose lane improvements. • Met with every city manager orcity management team in Riverside County. • Met with 40 diverse stakeholder groups across Riverside County to ascertain transportation needsand priorities. • Conducted a countywide voter survey and focusgroupson a potential countywide salestax to fund transportation improvements. • Assisted the Rail Department with an online survey of potential new transit corridors. • Gave presentationsto numerousservice clubsand businessgroupsand at town hall meetings forcitiesand County supervisors. • Participated in industry gatherings, such as the Mobility 21 summit and SHCC Focus on the Future — providing informational materials and discussing the Commission's work within the transportation industry. • Upgraded the internal RCTC photo library and file transfer protocol file sharing system to facilitate easier internal and external communication. • Began 1-15 ExpressLanesproject stakeholder meetingsand construction outreach planning. • Held a successful groundbreaking ceremony forthe 1-15 ExpressLanesproject. • Supported the MultimodalServicesDepartment with public meetingsforthe Coachella Valley - San Gorgonio Passcorridor rail service. • Supported marketing effortsforthe 91 Express Lanes. • Created eaccntial internal procedures for social media, including guidelines for creating content, oversight, legal polices, and analytics. Major Initiatives in FY 2018/ 19 Legislative A ffa irs lhe Legislative Affairs team will continue monitoring and engaging on individual legislation that movesthrough Congressand the State Legislature, pluspoliciesemerging from the Gubernatorial and Presidential Administrations. It is also possible that a federal infrastructure funding package will move forward in FY2018/19, potentially aslarge as$1 trillion. If such a package beg insto move forward, significant Commission engagement will be necessary to ensure Riverside County is able to receive its fair share of funding. Much attention regarding Sacramento will be devoted to the implementation and protection of SB 1, pursuant to the Commission'sadopted state legislative platform. Finally, the legislative affairsteam will continue to manage the consultant bench procured to assist the Commission in applying forstate, federal, and regional grant funds. Public Affairs An ambitious year is planned for the Commission's public affairs program. The RCTC Strategic Ascssment charged staff with planning an increasingly robust public communication and engagement effort to make the Commission's work more accessible and transparent to its constituents, with an emphasison using modern technology to reach people where they get their information. Accordingly, major initiativesforcommunication forFY2018/19 include: • Complete the RCTC.org website overhaul and visual identity refresh. Continuousupgrade and maintenance of the new RCTC.org will be a key focus. Staff will also continue to integrate new visual identity features into Commission materials published for public consumption, with a goal of increasing awarenessof Commission activitiesamong the general public. • Ascertain stakeholder needs, establish relationships, and execute communications plans for construction of the 1-15 Express Lanesproject. • Continue close coordination with OCTA on developing a marketing and communications plan forthe 91 Express Lanes. • Procure consultant resources for a complete public education and engagement strategy. Commission staff will augment lean staff resources with the innovation and capacity of the private sectorto operate a robust public engagement effort, asdirected by the Commission. • Continue Operation Lifesaver'seffective rail safety education campaign at Riverside County schoolsand community sites. • Assist the Rail Department with Metrolink marketing efforts. Department Goals The External Affairs Department plays a unique role by providing broad internal support to all Commission departments while also being the conduit for a wide variety of external actors to receive information and advance the public's general interest in better mobility in Riverside County. To that extent, the External Affairs Department's goals truly are the Commission -wide goalsof quality of life, operational excellence, connecting the economy and being a responsible partner. The External Affairs Department will adapt and maneuverto ensure achievement of these broaderorganizational aims. Extema I Affairs Performance/Workload Indicators FY16/17 Estimated FY16/17 Actual FY17/18 Estimated FY18/19 Projected Legislative action submittalsto Commission 8 7 8 8 Commission -adopted legislative positions N/A N/A N/A 25 State/Federal/Regional grants pursued 3 3 3 1 Itemsof state orfederal legislation sponsored by the Commission 1 1 1 0 Speakersbureau/stakeholderpresentations/events 196 35 116 120 Social media postingsper week (average) 2 5 5 6 Facebook"Likes' N/A N/A 7,467 8,000 Twitter followers N/A N/A 992 1,200 Instagram followers N/A N/A 170 500 "The Point" postingsper month (average) N/A N/A 2 4 "The Point' subscribers N/A N/A 800 1,200 Website visitorsper month (average) N/A N/A 10,000 12,000 Operation Lifesaverschool and community presentations/events 65 95 65 65 Finance Mission Statement: Finance safeguards the Commission's aoocts and maintains strong and prudent fiscal controls in accounting, budgeting, procurements, debt financing, investing, and financial reporting including ongoing disclosure to all interested parties. Finance seeksfinancing altemativesthat complement the Commission'sstrategic direction. Chart 38 —Finance 531ariesand Benefits 7% Expenditures Pro fe ssio n a I Costs 12% Capital Outlay 3% the Finance Department'stotal budget is$17,543,600 (Table 59) and reflectsa 2%decrease over the prior year's budget. Department staffing costs will total $1,218,300, reflecting a net increase in FIE allocations, an increase to the Commission's contribution to employee health benefits, and merit - based salary increases. Professional costsof $2,084,700 include variousservicesrelated to general and specialized legal, financial and investment advisory, external and intemal audits, debt management, CAFR and annual budget graphic design, and procurement. afpport costs of $543,500 include insurance, printing, and staff training. Capital outlay of $513,700 inc lud es ERP upd ates. Transfersout of $13,100,000 and $83,400 are related to funding a portion of the debt service interest payments and administrative coststo the General fund, respectively, from the 2009 Measure A Westem County bond financing program. Table 59—Finance Expenditure Detail FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change &Ilariesand Benefits $ 967,500 $ 1,110,200 $ 1,109,600 Professional Costs Legal Services 24,200 175,000 83,900 Audit Services 331,900 466,000 402,500 Fn a n c is I Advisory 140,800 175,000 150,000 Professiona l Sr fV ices - General 1,111,500 1,379,200 884,100 Tot a I Professional Costs 1,608,400 2,195,200 1,520,500 9ipport Costs 941,500 964,000 471,800 Capital Outlay 600 280,000 85,000 Tra nsfe rs Out 10,000,000 13,277,000 13,199,900 TOTAL Fnance $ 13,518,000 $ 17,826,400 $ 16,386,800 $ 1,218,300 155,000 427,500 150,000 1,352,200 2,084,700 543,500 513,700 13,183, 400 5 17.543.6n0 $ 108,100 10% (20,000) -11% (38,500) -8% (25,000) -14% (27,000) -2% (110,500) -5% (420,500) -44% 233,700 83% (93,600) -1% $ (282,800) -2% Finance Staffing Summary Position FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Accountant 0.96 1.00 Accounting Assistant 1.00 1.95 Accounting Technician 2.00 2.00 Administrative Assistant 0.08 0.00 Chief Financial Officer 0.45 0.44 Deputy Director of Finance 0.93 0.65 IT Administrator 0.00 0.01 Procurement Analyst 0.17 0.20 Procurement Manager 0.12 0.15 Senior Administrative Assistant 0.63 0.68 Senior Financial Analyst 0.65 0.20 Senior Management Analyst 0.04 0.02 Senior Office Assistant 0.00 0.30 FTE 7.03 7.60 Department Budget Overview Department Description Finance and Accounting 0.98 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.65 0.91 0.00 0.10 0.12 0.65 0.60 0.00 0.26 8.27 Commission resources are allocated to assure financial stability and fiscal accountability. Finance activities include investing the Commission's cash resources, planning and directing financial transactions, and subsequent monitoring of legal and regulatory requirements. Adequate cash flow must be maintained while at the same time prudently investing operating and capital funds. Borrowing needsare carefully planned using both short- and long-term debt. Once debt is ivied, there are ongoing responsibilities including interaction with financial advisors, bankers, dealers and remarketing agents, underwriters, bond counsel, bond insurers, trustees, issuing and paying agents, arbitrage consultants, investment managers, and rating agenciesaswell asproviding regularand consistent information disclosure to investors. Fiscal accountability involves receiving all funds due the Commission, paying all Commission obligations, maintaining the general ledger, reporting regularly on the Commission'sfiscal results, and preparing and monitoring the budget. Fiscal accountability requires the coordination of budget planning and monitoring and the accurate and timely accounting for all funding sources, including compliance with all applicable laws and regulations governing those funds. Accounting encomparrrs cash receipt and disbursement functions, maintenance of the general ledger including project cost accounting, payroll processing, debt and investment management, quarterly and annual financial reporting, and retention of and coordination with independent auditors. lhe Commission also recognizes the importance of accountability for the organization. As a result, the Commission is highly regarded by individuals, peers, other organizations, and government officials at a local, regional, state, and national basis. A formal organizational accountability program was approved in January 2006 to address fraud risk, ethical conduct, financial and operational disclosure, and maintaining the public's confidence in the Commission. Accordingly, measures have been implemented based on a conceptual framework related to oversight, reporting, fraud, internal control, and ethics. Procurement Management In the management of the procurements and contracts process, the responsibility of the procurement management function isto ensure that the procurement policiesapproved by the Commission are followed and procurement proceduresare updated as required. The function is responsible for the purchase of all goods and services, except for real property acquisition, in accordance with Commission policiesand federal and state funding requirementsto ensure the implementation of the Commission's projects and programs. This includes the administration of the Commission'sDBEand SBEprogram. Procuring goods and services for the Commission is a cooperative effort. All Commission staff involved in procurements for their projects and programs are responsible to employ sound judgment and appropriate standards of ethics and fairness to procure in a manner most advantageous to the Commission. The Procurement division also conducts a review of and updatesinsurance coverage forthe Commission and itsproperties. Key Assumptions for FY 2018/ 19 • The commercial paper letter of credit facility will be maintained with strong short-term ratings. • The Commission will maintain strong AA category long-term credit ratings related to its sales tax bondsand investment grade ratingsrelated to itstoll bondsand 11FIA loans. • Proceedsfrom the 2017A Bonds, 2017 11FIA Loan, and federal fundswill be used to fund the 1- 15 Express Lanes project; proceeds from the 2017A Bonds will also be used to fund the completion of the 91 Project. • A consultant will perform annual arbitrage calculations related to the outstanding debt issues. • The Commission will pay 100% of the actuarially determined contribution related to postretirement health care benefitsbased on a current actuarial valuation. • Implement GASB Statement No. 75 related to the accounting and financial reporting for otherpost-employment benefits. • Directors and program managers will continue to have adequate project budget and accounting information to make informed decisions. • Toll operationsaccounting information will be proceed and provided by the toll operations contractor's back office, and a service organization report, or SOC1-Type 2 report, will be obtained annually. • Construction fund bond proceeds will be invested in mid-term securities that mature in accordance with the construction draw schedule. Operating funds will be invested in state and local agency investment poolsfor short-term liquidity purposes and in mid-term treasury and federal agency securities as available funds are identified. The overall interest rate is conservatively projected to be 0.50°/0 for operating funds managed by state and County investment pools aswell as an investment management firm and 0.75%for debt service and construction fundsmanaged by an investment management firm. • Procurements will be conducted in accordance with the Commission's procurement policy manual. • Procurement will continue to maintain a standardized procurement filing system and centralized procurement files. • Procurement will conduct outreach activities to encourage DBE and SBE participation in variouscontractsand projects. Accomplishments in FY 2017/ 18 • Issued $158.8 million of 2017A Bonds and executed the 2017 T1F1A Loan to finance the 1-15 Express Lanes project; a portion of the 2017A Bonds also provided funding for 91 Project completion. " Extended the commercial paper program's letter of credit and reimbursement agreement with State Street Bank for an additional three years. " Ivied $392.7 million of 2017B Refunding Bonds to advance refund all of the outstanding 2010A Bonds and the callable portion of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds  achieving a net present value savings of $39 million or9.7%; this was accomplished in less than two months following the introduction of federal tax reform. " Issued $64.3 million of 2018 Refunding Bonds to refinance variable rate bonds issued in 2009 with fixed rate debt and finance a swap termination payment; this resulted in termination of the related standby bond purchase agreements. " Prepared and submitted to TIRA the Initial Financial Plan and the Financial Plan Annual Update forthe 1-15 Express Lanes project and the 91 Project, respectively. " Prepared and submitted required continuing disclosure reports related to the 91 Project financing to TIRA and/or the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board's Dectronic Municipal Market Access(EMMA) System, including the monthly construction progressreport. " Fulfilled other continuing disclosure requirementswith timely filingsto EMMA. " Worked with Toll Operations staff, OCTA, and the 91 Express Lanes operator to ensure that proper accounting and financial reporting process were maintained for the 91 Express Lanesoperations. " Presented an update to the rating agenciesof the Commission'ssalestax and toll financing programs. " Obtained financial reporting excellence award from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) (25th year) related to the CAFRforthe fiscal year ended June 30, 2017. " Obtained GFOA distinguished budget award (22nd year) for annual budget forthe fiscal year beginning July 1, 2017. " Generated approximately $8.5 million in additional Measure A sales tax revenue since the engagement of a firm in January 2008 to provide sales tax audit services in order to detect and correct salestax reporting errors. " Participated in small business networking activities and met with potential DBE and SBE vendors. Major Initiatives in FY 2018/ 19 Finance and Accounting The commercial paper program has been in place for 13 years and provides short-term, advance funding for projects included in the 2009 Measure A and related Westem Rverside County Delivery Plan. Commission management will continue to utilize the commercial paper program in FY 2018/19 to fund the 91 Project completion, as required. The current credit and liquidity support for the commercial paper program is $60,000,000, and the existing letter of credit and reimbursement agreement with Sate Street Bank expires in October 2020. The Commission will monitor the credit quality of gate Street Bank for any actionsthat may affect the short-term ratings of the commercial paperprogram. The Commission will continue to invest project finance funds with the advice and assistance of an investment management and advisory firm. Operating funds available for investment are coordinated with the assistance of a second investment management and advisory firm. The Commission invests its funds in accordance with the Commission's priorities of safety, liquidity, and then yield. The investment managers and advisors will continuously review the Commission's investment policy forany required updatesand other recommendations. Staff maintainsa comprehensive financing plan to support the highway and rail capital projectsto be delivered through 2019 and to asEcssfuture financing requirements. Thisfinancing plan incorporates revised sales tax revenue forecasts as well as other potential federal, state, and local revenue sources, including tolls. Based on the updated cost estimates for the projects and identified revenues, potential project funding shortfalls may result in project deferrals or require alternative financing strategies. Rnancing alternatives to be considered include commercial paper, long-term bond issuesto finance Measure A and toll projects, and federal loan programs. To ensure that the Commission receivesthe proper amount of Measure A salestaxes, the Commission will continue to engage a firm to conduct sales tax audit services. The firm will also provide quarterly salestax analysis and reporting services, of which a summary report is presented to the Commission on a quarterly basis. The Commission will also continue to engage a consultant to provide %mi- annual sales tax forecasts for use in the development of revenue projections for the annual budget processand comprehensive financing plan updates. The Finance Department will continue to keep abreast of GASB technical activities affecting the Commission's accounting and financial reporting activities, including a recently issued statement related to the accounting forleases. The Finance Department will continue to axcssfinancial policies, procedures, and reporting and ensure proper intemal control. Consultantsmay be engaged to assist staff in the development of efficient accounting and reporting processes and development of an investorrelationspage on the Commission'swebsite. The Finance Department will update its ERP system to integrate data processing across the Commission, automate administrative processes, and embrace data integration. The continued ERP efficiency gains include an automated paperless workflow system, advanced project accounting, budgeting, multi -year contract management, grant tracking, and readily available scanned images that retrievable by all users Procurement Management A centralized procurements process will continue to be maintained to manage requests for proposals, qualifications, invitations for bids, small purchases, and related contract administration issues The Procurement Policy Manual reflectsbest practicesand applicable federal, state, and local lawsand regulations The procurement system hasstrengthened controlsto ensure consistency in the development and application of procurement policies and procedures and adherence to applicable lawsand regulations, especially those related to federal and state grants Procurement utilizes PlanetBids to assist staff in its efforts to administer and manage an efficient procurement process and conduct outreach to small businerorrs and DBEs for Commission projects and programs PlanetBidsisa web -based vendor and bid -management software. The PlanetBidse- procurement application helpsstreamline the complete bidding processand enablesthe collection and analysisof all aspectsofvend ordata, purchasing activities, and corresponding history. PlanetBids providesa better service and convenience to vendorsand automatically notifies potential vendorsof bid alerts In order to improve the efficiency and productivity of resources, the Commission will continue to outsource the administration of the insurance certificate tracking process related to agreements Procurement Management is responsible for developing, implementing, and monitoring DBE and SBEprogram requirements in coordination with contractors and other appropriate officials Dutiesand responsibilitiesinclude: • Establishing DBEattainment goals; • Monitoring reporting and utilization by contractors; • Gathering and reporting statistical data and other information asrequired; • Reviewing third -party contracts and purchase requisitions for compliance with the program; • Ensuring that bid noticesand requestsforproposalsare made available to DBEsand SBEs in a timely manner; • Reporting to and advising the Executive Director and Commission on DBE and SEE matters; and " Providing outreach to DBEsand SBEsto fully advise them of contracting opportunities. Additionally, the Commission recognizes the vital role that local business play in the County, and it strongly encourages, supports, and promotes the participation of local business in providing goods and services to the Commission. Procurement is committed to providing contracting opportunities to local businesses to strengthen the County'slocal economy and to promote the development of the small, local business community. During FY 2018/19, the Commission will jointly participate in other outreach events in order to acquaint potential local, small, and disadvantaged businew,s with the Commission's procurement procedures and opportunities. Staff also consults with the Commission's insurance broker in procuring competitive quotes, on an annual basis, for various insurance coverages secured by the Commission in order to provide cost effective solutionsto meet itsdiverse insurance needs. Department Goals Protect the Commission's cash resources by regular monitoring of investment practices to ensure consistency with established investment policy. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: " Utilize investment management and advisory servicesto prudently invest operating and capital fundsin accordance with the Commission'sinvestment policies. " Achieve a rate of retum at least equal to the County of Riverside Treasury Pool rate for operating funds. " Establish an appropriate benchmark for the investment of debt proceeds and excess operating funds. Manage the Commission's outstanding debt ensuring compliance with applicable laws and regulations and continued investor awareness and receptivity to the Commission's program. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: " Provide an annual update and review of the debt programs with at least three of the rating agenciesno laterthan June 30, 2019. " Meet continuing disclosure requirements of the sales tax and toll revenue debt programs and comply with the 1lFIA loan reporting requirements. " Enhance the Commission'swebsite to provide timely and useful infomnation to investors. " Prepare arbitrage calculationsasrequired. Ensure the Commission and funding recipients comply with Measure A and IDA laws and regulations as they relate to the annual financial and compliance audits as well as close cooperation and coordination with independent auditors. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: " Minimize the number of audit adjustment, substantive management letter comments, and compliance findingsrequiring corrective action by the Commission. " Maintain appropriate fiduciary review and monitoring procedures for Measure A recipient and IDA claimant audits. Maintain fiscal and budgetary control through monitoring of periodic results and ensuring consistency with the Commission's strategic direction. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Obtain the GFOA Distinguished Budget Award forthe FY2018/19 budget. • Facilitate a comprehensive budgeting approach that effectively involves management staff, requiring full accountability for all department expenditures. • Fund 100%of the actuarially determined contribution related to the postretirement health care benefits. Assure fiscal accountability for Commission funds with general ledger accounting and financial reporting consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Ensure proactive communication and timely responses to any noted errors, corrections, and budget transfers related to program and project management reviews of accounting and budget information. • Obtain an unmodified opinion on the basic financial statements. • Receive financial reporting excellence award from the GFOA related to the preparation and issuance of the CAFR • 3ay abreast of finance, accounting, and financial reporting developments by attending training and conferencesin these general areasorin specialized areasapplicable to job duties. • Update and maintain the fiscal policiesand proceduresmanual. • Update and maintain complete accounting desk proceduresmanual for ITV system to facilitate crosstraining. • arpport staff and consultants with training opportunities in order to effectively utilize the ERP system capabilities. • Assist local govemments with Measure A funding by providing timely allocation of funds for eligible projectsand programs. • Maintain 17Psystem to reflect technical updatesand current technology. Develop and maintain an organizational accountability program encompassing financial and operational functions. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Establish and implement measuresrelated to oversight, fraud, intemal control, and ethics. • Issue annual disclosure statementsrelated to financial and operational responsibilities. • Continue to revise and develop finance and accounting policiesand proceduresthat reflect the requirementsof federal, state, and local requirementsand the Commission'soperating practices. Procure goods and services from qualified consultants, contractors, and other vendors in accordance with laws and regulations at a competitive price. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Assist departments and programs to procure and obtain goods and servicesin a cost effective and efficient manner. • Ensure that procurementsare conducted in accordance with the Procurement Policy Manual. • Ensure that agreements, amendments, and MOUs are entered into with appropriate legal considerations. • Processagreements, amendments, and MOUsin a timely and efficient manner. " Ensure that consistent procedures, process, and toolsare used for procurements. Review existing procurement policies and procedures. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: " Ensure that the procurement policesreflect Commission requirementsand practices. " Segregate policies and procedures so that procedures can be easily updated without Commission approval. " Ensure that procurement policies and procedures reflect the requirements of the Commission's federal, state, and otherfunding sources. " Continue to provide an easy to read desktop quick procurement policiesreference guide for use by Commission staff. " Maximize the value received for the Commission'sexpenditure of public funds. " Provide all vendorsan equal opportunity to provide needed goodsand/or services. Finance Performance/Workload Indicators FY16/17 Estimated FY16/17 Actual FY17/18 Estimated FY18/19 Projected Salestax revenue bondsrating Aa2/AA+/AA Aa2/AA+/AA Aa2/AA+/AA Aa2/AA+/AA To I I revenue bond rating BBB-/ BBB- BBB-/ BBB- BBB-/ BBB BBB-/ BBB TF1A loan rating: 2013 T FIA Loan 201711F1A Loan BBB- N/A BBB- N/A BBB- BBB -/BBB BBB- BBB -/BBB Commercial paperrating P-1/A-1+ P-1/A-1+ P-1/A-1+ P-1/A-1+ GFOA Certificate of Achievement Awarded Awarded Awarded Awarded GFOA Distinguished Budget Award Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient Invoicesprocessed 6,810 7,599 7,700 7,800 Checks processed 3,900 4,183 4,300 4,400 Audit adjustments 0 0 0 0 Average yield on investments 0.25% operating/0.75 %debt proceeds 1.04% operating/1.46 %debt proceeds 0.50% operating/0.75 %debt proceeds o 0.50% 0 operating/0.75/0 debt proceeds Payroll hoursprocessed 93,400 96,402 96,400 98,400 Accountsreceivable invoices processed 240 189 200 200 Ag re e m e n is p ro c e sse d 220 249 260 260 Planning and Programming Mission Statement: Planning and Programming exerts leadership in transportation planning and the programming of funds to improve mobility, foster environmental stewardship, expedite project delivery, and form partnershipswith local, regional, state, and federal agenciesresulting in maximum retumson local investment. Planning and Programming also supports coordinated regional approach to solve transportation funding issues. Chart39—Planning and Programming Tra nsfe rs Out 5% Projectsand Operations 88% Expenditures Salariesand Benefits 6% Pro fe ssio n a I Costs 1% Planning and Programming expenditures of $20,526,200 increased 48%from last year's budget (Table 60). Salaries and benefits represent 6% of total uses and reflect a net increase in FfE allocations, an increase to the Commission'scontribution to employee health benefits, and merit - based salary increases. Professional services totaling $295,500 decreased 52% due to project database upgrades in the previous year. Professional services include congestion management program (CMP) implementation efforts, airquality analysis, project database management, local and regional planning activities, on -call goodsmovement consultants, and legal services. alp port costsincreased 4%or$19,100and include variousmembership duesand staff -related travel costs. Projectsand operations costs increased 59%primarily due to engineering and construction work forthe Santa Ana River Trail project forthe District, operating disbursementsto local agencies, and regional transportation model update. A transferout of $1,017,400 isrelated to administrative costs to the General fund. Table 60-Planning and Programming Expenditure Detail FY 16/17 Actual FY 17/18 Revised Budget FY 17/18 FY 18/ 19 Projected Budget Dollar Percent Change Change Salaries and Benefits Pro fe ssio n a I Costs Legal Services Audit Services ProfessionalServices - General Total Professional Costs aipport Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations Engineering Construction Rght of Way apecialaudies Operating and Capital Disbursements Total Projects and Operations Tra n sfe rs Out TOTAL Planning and Programming Planning and Programming Position Capital Projects Manager Chief Financial Officer Deputy Executive Director Executive Director External Affairs Director IT Administrator Management Analyst Multimodal Services Director Planning and Programming Director Planning and Programming Manager Procurement Analyst Procurement Manager Project Delivery Director Right of Way Manager Senior Administrative Assistant Senior Management Analyst Capital Construction Manager FTE $ 1,023,200 $ 983,400 $ 983,400 34,800 82,900 117,700 27,400 77,500 18,000 525,000 620,500 18,300 124,400 243,000 2,993,400 (74,600) 3,963,500 50,800 265,000 188,300 2,600,000 1,083,800 1,320,000 1,372,700 $ 2,541,000 $ 11,384,900 870,300 13,877,400 Staffing Summary FY 16/17 0.17 0.01 0.04 0.45 0.03 0.00 0.79 0.01 0.97 0.99 0.14 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.21 1.05 0.00 Department Budget Overview Department Description 32,000 29,400 116,000 177,400 14,500 243,000 1,000,000 450,000 140,000 1,825,000 1,320,000 4,978,000 762,600 $ 6,915,900 FY 17/18 0.28 0.00 0.13 0.45 0.00 0.03 1.00 0.00 0.89 0.99 0.03 0.03 0.10 0.01 0.18 1.09 0.00 4.90 5.21 $ 1,147,400 44,500 20,000 231,000 295,500 19,100 271,800 2,620,000 10,708,000 255,000 1,372,000 2,820,000 18, 046, 800 1,017,400 u R')a inn FY 18/19 0.20 0.02 0.05 0.43 0.06 0.00 1.00 0.05 0.91 0.98 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.20 1.03 0.20 5.30 $ 164,000 17% (33,000) -43% 2,000 11 % (294,000) -56% (325,000) -52% 800 4 % 28,800 (373,400) 6,744,500 (10, 000) (1,228,000) 1,500,000 6,661,900 147,100 $ 6,648,800 12% -12 % 170 % -4 % -47% 114 % 59 % 17% 48% The Commission is responsible for short- and long-range transportation planning and programming. Short-range planning and programming involvesthe development of the five-year STIP and preparation of the six-yearFllP for the County. These programming documents identify projects funded from Measure A, transit operators' S1-(INs, state and federally funded projects, locally funded regionally significant projects, and local jurisdiction Capital Improvement Plans (C IPs). The Commission is responsible for approving projects for RIP funds in Western County and coordinating with Caltranson the selection of Interregional Improvement Program (IIP) funds as part of the STIP approved by the CTC every two years. The Commission delegated the authority to nominate projectsfor RIP funds in the Coachella Valley to CVAG. A MOU between the city of Blythe, representing Palo Verde Valley, and the Commission allowsthe city to trade RIP fundsfor local Measure A salestax funds. the Commission's involvement with long-range planning efforts includes the coordination and input into planning effortsthroughout the County, southern California region, and statewide. lhese efforts involve participation in local, bi-county, and regional corridor studies, including the continued development of the CETAP corridors. • The Commission commenced itsfirst Countywide LRTP in 2017 with completion anticipated in spring 2019. The LRTPwill provide a vision of Riverside County'sfuture integrated transportation system and will serve as a document to advocate for changes to transportation policy, legislation, and funding. It will also include a comprehensive review of projects, including highways, arterials, grade separations, transit, and active transportation improvements. • The RTP is a 30-year transportation plan developed by SLAG in conjunction with county transportation commissions, sub -regional agencies, local agencies, transit operators, and other interested parties within the SCAG six -county region. The SCAG 2016 RIP incorporates SCSas required under SB 375. The SCScomponent establishes goals for projects, programs, and land -use designed to reduce GHG emissions. • Statewide planning efforts involve participation in the development of goods movement, interregional highways, and air quality plans, to name a few. The Commission also serves as the CMA for the County and is responsible for developing and updating the CMP. The CMP was developed to meet state legislation and federal Congestion Management Sy em requirements. The CMP's highways and regional arterials are regularly monitored to ensure that they are operating at acceptable levels (above Level of Service (LOS) "F'). If a deficiency occurs along the CMP system, a deficiency plan must be prepared that identifiesmitigation measuresand/orprojectsthat will improve the LOSto "E' or higher. In November2006, the voters of California approved Proposition 1B, which provided $20 billion in transportation infrastructure funding and established various program categories including a $2 billion infusion into the STIP. Other competitive program categories included Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) and Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (TGIF). The County succeeded in receiving CMIA funding forthe 9R91 HOVlanesand 1-215widening projects, which were completed with the exception of the Pachappa underpass portion of the SR91 HOV lanes project. The Pachappa underpass project was split off asa separate project and will be funded with 931 Local Partnership Program formula funding. TCIF funding was approved for 11 grade separation projects and a ground access improvement project at the I-215/Van Buren interchange. All grade separation projectswere completed with the exception of the Avenue 66 Grade Separation Bypass. An amendment to the CTC will be submitted in 2019 to request that savings from other TCIF projects be reprogrammed to the Avenue 66 Grade Separation Bypass project. The FASTAct, signed into law in December2015, established a new formula freight fund underthe National Highway Freight Program fora five-yearperiod. The CTC isresponsible forallocating these funds. In October 2017, the CTC finalized guidelinesfora call for projectsthat wascombined with funding established for the Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP) under SB 1. The CTC adopted the TCEPprojectsin May2018. The Commission isresponsible forallocating the following local, state, and federal funding sources: Local Sources State Sources Federal Sources 1989 and 2009 Measure A S3821 for pedestrian and bicycle projects STBG 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial (MARA) S11P-RIP CMAQ Western County TUMF regional arterial program ATP Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)/County share Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) SB 1 Local Partnership Program Formula Share Programming specifically involvesthe development, review, and approval of projectsfor various funding programs, particularly those where the Commission has a responsibility for project nominations. Additionally, programming involvesthe monitoring of projectsfrom project selection through construction close-out. In order to receive federal funds and approvals, all projects funded with federal and state dollars, or local projects that are regionally significant, must be included in the RIP and FTIP in accordance with project delivery schedules and financial constraint requirements. SLAG, as the MPO, is responsible for incorporating all six -county (Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura) transportation improvement programs into one regional programming document or the RIP/SCS SLAG also conducts a conformity analysis with the adopted air plans to ensure compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards, as stipulated by Environmental Protection Agency's Transportation Conformity Rule, and GHG reduction targetsadopted byCARB.The RIP/SCSisupdated every fouryears, and the FTIPupdate effort isperformed every 18to 24 months. Multiple amendmentsoccurwithin each FTIPcycle; RIP amendments are lessfrequent asthey require air quality conformity analyses. FTIP amendments can occurforminor project changesthat do not affect the conformity determination. Partnership development, public and private, iscritical to the Commission'scontinued successin affecting positive transportation decisions to meet future demands. Commission staff works in close coordination with its partnersto advocate for federal, state, and local funding to improve mobility and mitigate the impactsof goodsmovement. Key Assum ptions for FY 2018/ 19 • The Commission will continue its effortsto work with transportation partnersto streamline and improve project delivery. • The Commission will maintain consultant contracts to provide assistance with the CMP, air quality analysis, project database management, LRIP, regional truck study, on -call grant writing, and other related planning activities. • The Commission will utilize all available funding sourceson transportation projects identified in the 2009 Measure A as well as other regional high priority projects, including TUMF regional arterial projectsand grade separation projects. • The Commission will continue participation in local, bi-county, and regional planning efforts representing the interestsof the County. • The Commission will work with the CTC, Caltrans, SCAG, and local project sponsors to implement projects funded with STIP/RIP, SB 1, ATP, or other available fund sources to ensure that the programming and allocationsare consistent with project schedules. • The Commission will continue to assist local project sponsorswith the processing of state and federal funding approvals/obligations/allocationsand overall project delivery. Accomplishments in FY 2017/ 18 • Facilitated the process of over25 CTC actions that consisted of, but were not limited to: ATP Cycle 3 awards, financial allocations, and extensionsof time. • Completed two local agency agreements and/or amendments for the implementation of TUMFregional arterial projects. • Processed over 128 project amend mentsinto the 2017 FTIP. • Submitted the 2019 FTIP Update consisting of 396 projects. • Submitted the 2016 RTP/SCSAmendment No. 3 consisting of 17 new projects and several existing projects. • Coordinated with Caltrans and project sponsors monthly regarding the obligation of federal and state funding, met obligation deadlines, and prevented lossof funding to the County. • Monitored federal funding expenditures of inactive projects to ensure funds were not deobligated. • Advised local agencies and coordinated the use of toll credits and local match waiver for federally funded projects funded at the maximum reimbursement level, saving the Commission and local agencies up to $1,757,000 in local match funds programmed in FY 2017/ 18. • Reviewed and approved the Measure A five-yearClPsfor each local agency in the County. • Worked with SCAG and southern California agenciesto develop ATP Cycle 3 Augmentation funding distribution recommendations for the MPO region programming $11.4 million for Riverside County projects. • Collaborated with local agencies and community organizations, such as the Active Transportation Network, Safe Routes to School Partnership, Active Transportation Resource Team, to provide resourcesfor active transportation projects. • Continued to work collaboratively with other regional and statewide working groups, such as the Transportation Conformity Working Group and California Federal Programming Group to share information and more effectively stay abreast of changesto federal and state program guidelines. • Continued to take a leadership role and worked collaboratively with Mobility 21, SCAG's Southern California National Freight Gateway Collaboration, and other regional transportation planning agencies(RTPAs) on goodsmovement and freight issues. • Represented the Commission at monthly MSRC Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meetings to monitor and track funding programsand opportunities. • Represented the Commission at SB 1 workshops throughout the State to participate in the development of program guidelines for various programs, including the Local Partnership Program, Solutionsfor Congested Corridors, TCEP, and ATP. • Continued efforts related to the development of the LRTP. • Completed a draft of the Regional Truck Fee Study. • Monitored three 33821 Bicycle and Pedestrian FacilitiesCallforProjectsCyclesand processed 15 claimsand 18 extension requests. • Evaluated the current ATP MPO Regional Program 10-point policy, which allows the Commission to add up to 10 pointsto each project application. • Approved and monitored a1129 member agency Measure A ClPsand amendments, totaling over$54 million. Major Initiatives in FY 2018/ 19 Each county transportation commission throughout the State is responsible for programming RIP funds, which represents75%of the totalSTlPfunding available statewide forcapital enhancement projects. The 75% funding level is then further distributed with 60% of the funds allocated to southern California and 40% to northern California. A population formula is then applied to determine county funding levelscalled "county shares." The Commission isresponsible forensuring that projects funded with STIP funding are administered and implemented consistent with CTC and Caltranspolicies. It isthe Commission'spolicy to set aside 2%off the top of new programming capacity for staff support to carry out STIP PPM activities. The remaining RIP funds are further distributed geographically among Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley per the Commission's intra-county STIP formula. The Commission also may consider a call for projects for RlPdiscretionaryfundswhen sufficient programming capacity isavailable. The CTC administers federal TAP fundssimilarto STIPfunds under the State'sATPthat wascreated by SB99 and AB 101 to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking and walking. Federal TAP fundsare not subject to general fund diversions; however, TAP funds are authorized each year by the paosage of the state budget. WRCOG administersthe Western County TUMF program and collectsthe feesfrom participating jurisdictions. WRCOG disburses to the Commission approximately 46.4% of the TUMF funds collected. The Commission furtherdistributesthese fundsequallyto the Commission'sTUMFCETAP corridors and regional arterial programs. In September 2004, the Commission established a program and approved the programming of 23 regional arterial projects. To date, $135 million has been programmed forTUMFregional arterial projects. Due to fluctuating TUMFrevenuesoverthe past few years, $14.5 million in 2009 Western County MARA fundsand $25.5 million in TUMFCETAP fundswere programmed on two projectsto fulfill the TUMFcommitment. Of the 23 TUMF regional arterial projects, 15 projectscompleted construction, six projectsare currently under construction or in pre -construction, and two projects are in the development phase and remain to be programmed for future TUMFfunds. Planning and Programming also managesthe 2009 Western County MARA program and to date approximately $64 million has been programmed. The expenditures for these regional arterial capital projects are included in the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department budget. Transportation Planning The Commission's planning role throughout the year will involve working with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), FTA, CTC, Caltrans, SCAG, councils of governments, local agencies, and the other county transportation commissions in the region on various planning efforts relative to the implementation of the 2016 RTP/SCS, corridor and goods movement studies, LRTP, and the development and update of corridor plans as required for SB 1 funding programs. The 2020 RTP/SCS process will also begin in late 2018 and will require coordination amongst local jurisdictions, transit operators, and Caltrans. In addition, the LRTPwill be well underway and will serve asa document to include regional projectsand identify potential" bundling" of multi -modal projects for a more systematic and holistic approach in applying for competitive grant opportunities. These planning effortswill be supported through consultant contracts in FY2018/19 using LTFplanning and STIPPPM funds. Transportation Programming Asmentioned above, the Commission isresponsible forprogramming and allocating variouslocal, state and federal funds. These fundswill be monitored to ensure that regulationsare adhered to in order to prevent funds from lapsing. The following summarizes the status of these funding programs: Local Funding Westem County TUMFRegional Arterial Program Planning and Programming staff will monitor TUMF regional arterial projects based on the agreementsbetween local agenciesand the Commission. In addition, Commission staff will work with local agencies regarding amendments to agreements and any issues regarding project delivery. To date, the Commission executed project agreements with local agencies for CETAP TUMFand regional arterial fundstotaling approximately $135 million. By the end of FY2018/19, the majority of expenditures will have been reimbursed to local agencies for TUMF regional arterial projects, which expenditures are included in the Capital Projects Development and Delivery Department. Project programming forthe remaining projectswill be forwarded to the Commission and will be based on project readiness and funding availability. Staff will coordinate future programming of additional TUMFregional arterial projectswith WRCOG and local jurisdiction staff. 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial Program Prior to 2014, the Commission programmed $40 million of MARA funds on six projects. During the 2014 multi -funding call for projects, the Commission approved five projects in Western County for an additional $24 million of MARA funds. Of the 11 MARA-funded projects, eight were completed and three are under construction. 2009 Measure A Local Streets and Roads In orderto receive Measure A local streetsand roadsfunding each year, the Commission requires the local jurisdictions to submit a five-year CIP based on Measure A revenue projections. Additionally, the local jurisdictions are required to submit a Maintenance of Effort (MOE) certification consistent with adopted MOE guidelines and participate in the MSHCP and in the local agency's respective TtJMF program, as applicable. Planning and Programming process administrative amendmentsto ClPsforminorchangesthat do not affect the total programmed amount or are within budget levels. Sgnificant changes require Commission approval. State Funding S91 The State Legislature and Governor approved SB 1 in April 2017. This gasoline tax provides approximately $5.2 billion in annual revenues for transportation purposes statewide, with more than $113 million to Riverside County. The CTC is responsible for administering the majority of the new SB 1 programs. The Commission received over $13 million in Local Partnership Program formula fundscovering FYs2017/18and 2018/19and allocated the fundsto the following projects: • 71/91 interchange connector (environmental revalidation); • Pachappa underpass(construction); and • Temescal Canyon widening (construction). The Commission also submitted two project applications for the following SB 1 competitive programs: • Local Partnership Competitive Program — Railroad Canyon interchange improvement (construction); and • Solutionsfor Congested Corridors Program —71/91 interchange connector (construction). The CTC selected the Railroad Canyon interchange improvement project forthe award of Local Partnership Competitive Program funds. S71P-RIP This year the Commission will continue to deliver projects programmed in the STIP and work with local agenciesto ensure the allocation and expenditure of projectsby the respective deadlines. Staff will also be involved with the development and implementation of current and future SB 1 and ATP cycles, working with the CTC, Caltrans, SCAG, and RTPAsto ensure projectsin the County are successful in these funding programs. S3 821 SB821, also known asTDA Article 3, projects are funded by 2%of LTFrevenues; the expenditures under this program are included in the LTFspecial revenue fund and reflected in the Public and Specialized Transit Department since thisfund'sactivitiesrelate primarily to transit funding. Forthe last call for projects released in February 2017, the Commission awarded over $3.3 million to 22 pedestrian and bicycle projectsin the County.lre Commission will release itsnext call forprojects in February 2019, and an estimated $3.5 million will be available for programming. Federal Funding CMAQ, S7BG, and TAP/A7P The Commission is responsible for allocating CMAQ and ST3G (formerly SLrface Transportation Program or SIN) funds to transportation projects in the County. The Commission selects and approves CMAQ funds and SIt3G funds through a call for projects in addition to programming funds for Measure A and regional priority projects. The Commission delegates the selection of projectsforCMAQ fundsapportioned to the Salton Sea Air Basin to CVAG. Through SB 99 and AB 101, the State developed the ATP, which consolidated federal and state funding that traditionally funded bicycle and pedestrian projects, including the federal TAP. The CTC administers the ATP, a program designed to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation such asbiking and walking. Planning and Programming hasbeen involved with the development of the guidelines and participates in workshops and through the RTPA group to represent the County'sbest interest for each programming cycle. Project Monitoring the high demand for reporting and monitoring the progress of projects is escontial to prevent federal and state funds from lapsing. The Planning and Programming Department assists the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department and local agencies by participating in regularproject delivery team meetingsand preparing and submitting the request forauthorization (RFA)/allocation of federal and state funding. In addition, staff monitors allocation and award deadlines, expenditures, project closeouts, and inactive projects of federal and state funded projectsto prevent Iossoffunds. Regional Issues- Freight the Commission will continue to focus on facilitating ongoing commitments as well as being responsive to variousemerging regional and statewide issuesrelating to freight/goodsmovement that traversesthe southern California region. The Commission will continue working with partners from the Southern California Consensus Group (Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles, Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority, Alameda Corridor East Construction Authority, SBCTA, OCTA, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Ventura County Transportation Commission, 9CAG, and RRA) regarding goods movement issues. Recently the Commission coordinated with legislative staff and advocacy groups, such as Mobility 21 and S-ICC, to secure funding through the FASTActforgoodsmovement-related needssuch asthe funding of Alameda Corridor East grade separations in the County. The authorization of $10.8 billion in funding dedicated to freight and goods movement wasa direct result of thiseffort nationally; $6.3 billion will be available through an existing formula based on current apportionment data and $4.5 billion will be allocated pursuant to a merit -based, multimodal competitive grant program. At its January 2017 meeting, the Commission approved a consultant contract to conduct a Regional Truck Study to evaluate a logistics -related regional fee. Planning and Programming will forward the resultsof the study to the Commission for review and consideration. Department Goals Build upon relationships with local, state, and federal agencies to coordinate short- and long-range planning to ensure that transportation projects receive funding and approvals. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Operational Excellence, Responsible Partner) Objectives: • Work with CVAG, WRCOG, Caltrans, transit operators, local agencies, and SLAG to coordinate project amendmentsto the Kll'and/orF11P. • Provide the Commissionersinformation to assist in advocating Commission projects. • Continue CETAPintra-county corridor work. • Continue working with the RCA to implement the MSHCP. • Maintain maximum flexibility in project selection for FASTAct or state fund sources(i.e., STIP/SB 1)to serve the diverse needsof the County. Continue to seek a stronger role for county transportation commissions in state and regional transportation and air quality programs in order to direct funding for programs and projects that will improve air quality, mobility, and the economy in the County. (Policy Goals Quality of Life, Connecting the Economy) Objectives: • Support efforts to seek additional funding at the local, state, and federal levels for projects and planning efforts. • Support ongoing effortsto regulate federal emission sources. • Support effortsthat allow more flexibility in funding transit operating and capital costs. • Continue participation in the development of guidelinesforfunding programs. Develop a countywide long-range transportation plan to serve as a guide for decision making and as input to SCAG's next RTP/SCS. ( Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Responsible Partner) Objectives: • Complete the Commission'sfirst LKIP. • Direct consultant work on development of the second 10-year Measure A Western County Delivery Plan (2019-2029). • Provide LRIP project and policy information to SCAG for next RIP/S. Support local, regional, and state planning efforts in cooperation with SCAG, WRCOG, CVAG, Caltrans, and local agencies including, but not limited to, implementation of the CMP, transportation and air quality modeling updates/upgrades, corridor or focused area studies, development of active transportation plans or any planning related to the implementation of the RTP/SCS. (Policy Goals Quality of Life, Responsible Partner) Objectives: • Work with Caltrans and local agencies to review project alternatives that include travel demand management or integration of mode choices as required by the federal CMP for programming of federal SIBG and CMAQ funds. • Continue to work with Caltransto monitortraffic conditionsand focustransportation fundson congested corridorsand system deficiencies. • Work with local agencies, WRCOG, CVAG, and transportation and interest groupsto develop project applicationsforAlP, state Cap and Trade, and SLAG planning funds. Continue to advocate for jobs/housing balance and attracting high income jobs to the County in addition to addressing intercounty congestion. (Policy Goal: Connecting the Economy) Objectives: • Participate in ongoing studiesand activitiesto improve the job market and housing demand in Riverside County. • Support the County interests pertaining to transportation planning as population, job, and housing forecasts are developed by SLAG and the State to ensure consistency with those local forecasts. • Support efforts by local agencies to provide transportation improvement projects that will attract jobs. Maintain support of the SCAG regional FOP and Caltrans project databases to allow for efficient monitoring of projects and funding obligations with the ability to share project information with local jurisdictions. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Work with SLAG and other county transportation commissions to refine and maintain the SCAG regional RIP database including the ability to create customized reports. • Coordinate with Caltransto assure database compatibility and promote information -sharing including timely reporting of fund obligation information. Ensure maximum funding and flexibility for projects funded with S11P RIP, SB1, Proposition 1B, ATP, and federal FASTAct funds. (Policy Goal: Quality of Life) Objectives: • Participate in various state and federal forums to increase funding levels, streamline programming and allocation processes, and provide flexibility in obligating funds. • Support efforts advocating the continuation and protection of state transportation funding and the payback of loanstaken from state transportation accounts. • Advocate that RIP county share reserves receive priority programming over counties that advance shares. • Advocate that regions that program local and federal funds to replace state funding or advance an allocation due to state budget issues (or limited allocation capacity) be given high priority for repayment or in future programming in the next STIP programming cycle. • Continue to strategically program and fund projects to meet local, state, and federal goals and to obligate and/or allocate funds in an expeditious manner for the maximum use of all available funding. • Participate in Southern California Programming Roundtable meetingsto ensure that 100%of federal obligation authority (OA) for CMAQ and SIBG funding is obligated within the SCAG region. • Participate at CTC and Caltransforumsin the preparation and evaluation of ATP projectsfor the statewide and MPO funding programs. • Continue to monitor project implementation through the use of milestone reporting on a quarterly basis to maintain maximum funding levels for projects and prevent loss of funds to the County. • Monitor and influence the development of the National Freight Network required under FAST Act. • Advocate to increase funding to regions based on distribution language in the FASTAct, or successorfederal transportation legislation. Provide support to the Commission's Capital Project Development and Delivery and Finance departments to maintain project funding and schedules and minimize programming issues. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Provide input to the budget development process. • Attend regular meetingswith the Capital Projects Development and Delivery Department. • Serve in an oversight role regarding project reporting, invoicing, and close-outs. • Coordinate project RFA/OA packages. • Monitor progress of project milestones and RFAs as they are proce—rd through Caltrans headquartersand FHWA. • Prepare CTC allocation requests, extensions, and amendmentsforSTIP, SB 1, and Proposition 1Bfunded projects. Provide assistance to local agencies in reviewing funding guidelines and grant applications, and facilitate allocation and obligation processes required for project delivery. (Policy Goals Quality of Life, Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Continue coordination ofTAC meetings. • Provide information regarding project programming data, including funding status, to project sponsorson a quarterly basis. • Provide local agencies with recommendations on project programming to minimize unnecescary requirementsand delays. • Upon request, attend local agency project delivery team meetings to provide advice on programming issues. • Meet regularly with Caltrans local assistance staff to monitor project submittals and resolve project implementation and obligation issues. • Assist local jurisdictionsto review and prepare grant applications, air quality conformity, RFAs, STIPsubmittals, and inactive reporting justifications. Continue to work with state and federal age nciesto streamline processesforfunding and project approvals. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Maintain relationshipswith key staff at regional, state, and federal agencies. • Participate in SCAG'sNational Freight Gateway Collaboration to define a system that meets the region's long-term mobility, safety, environmental, and energy needs including developing a brand specific to goodsmovement projectsin southern California. • Identify problematic areas with project delivery and/or programming and work with state/federal lobbyiststo develop solutionsforstreamlining and clarifying processesunderFAST Act. • Participate in regional, state, and federal forums addressing issues related to project programming, implementation, and airquality conformity. Asa result of goods movement funding available under the FASTAct, determine where future efforts rega rd ing addressing the County goods move ment issueswould prove most effective. (Policy Goal: Quality of Life). Objectives: • Work with SCAG, CTC, and Caltrans on FASTACTfreight guidelines and Critical Urban Freight Corridor/Critical Rural Freight Corridorcorridorsin Riverside County. " Identify driversof demand for goodsmovement servicesand performance of modal systems and servicesaswell aspublic benefits, specific areasof inefficiency, and the impactsof goods movement on communities. " Review the Commission's 2017 Grade Separation Priority Update study and work with local jurisdictionsto apply forfunding programssuch asTCEP. " Review progressof remaining TCIFfunded projects. Facilitate public and private investments in clean airtechnology in support of the broader air quality programs for SLAG, SCAQMD, and the County local entities. (Policy Goal: Quality of Life) Objectives: " Work with SCAG, SCAQMD, CARB, and academia in monitoring GHG emission reduction from light trucksand automobilesthrough the implementation of the 2016 RIP/S. " Provide input and comments on guidelines developed by CARB, South Coast Air Quality Management District, and otherstate agenciesregarding the implementation ofAB32/S3375 and 93743 CEQA implementation. " Actively participate on the MSRC'sTAC to ensure equitable funding isavailable in support of emissionsreducing projectswithin the County. " Work with local agencies to identify projects that can compete for state Cap and Trade funding programs. Planning and Programming Performance/Workload Indicators FY16/17 Estimated FY16/17 Actual FY17/18 Estimated FY18/19 Projected Federal projects monitored for obligation authority delivery 26 15 17 5 ATPprojectsmonitored for allocation 18 15 15 4** IUMF Regional Arterial projects monitored for implementation/expenditures 4 4 4 4 IUMFagreements!amendments 4 2 2 0 MARA projects monitored for implementation/expenditures 6 6 6 6 MARA agreements amendments 1 1 1 0 2017 RIP amended projects (Biennial)* 180 155 128 0 2019 RIP Update (Biennial) N/A N/A 396 140 STIP/TCIF programming, allocations, amendments, and extensions for Commission projects/local agency projects 6 6 8 7 58821 projects awarded and monitored for extensionsand reimbursements 45 48 33 38 *Includes389 projectsincluded in the 2017 HP **Excludesprojectsto be awarded through ATP Cycle 4 in March 2019. Rail Mission Statement: Rail develops and supports paryrnger rail transportation options for increased mobility within Riverside County and the region. Chart 40—Rail Tra nsfe rs Out 2% r Projectsand Operations 78% Expenditures Salariesand Benefits 2% Professional Costs 9% sap port Costs 9% Rail expenditures of $37,119,800 include Metrolink operations and capital support as well as maintenance and operations of the nine Commission -owned and operated commuter rail stations (Table 61). Salaries and benefits reflect a 12% increase due to the allocation of FTEs, increase to the Commission's contribution to employee health benefits, and merit -based salary increases. Professional costs, which include legal and consultant services, decreased 27%due to a reduction in on -call rail consultants who support rail grants applications, management, and oversight and perform service planning and modeling for the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail service. &wort costs include station maintenance, media ads, printing services, and marketing incentives. Projects and operations expenditures of $28,778,800 increased 4%. Project and operations comprises planning and development for the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail service and an operating contribution increase to $19 million for 9CRRA Metrolink operations including the PVL service. The Commission's commuter rail program intends to utilize existing mechanisms within Metrolink to assoss and monitor operations and budget performance. Program operations relate primarily to station operations, and engineering and construction expenditures relate to the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail service. The "next generation" rail feasibility study is included in special studies. Capital outlay reflects a 3% increase and is due to a series of station related improvement projects and an increase in 9CRRA Metrolink capital needs. Transfers out of $882,900 relate to administrative costs to the General fund. Table 61 -Hail Expenditure Detail FY 16/17 Actua I FY 17/18 Revised Budget FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Dollar Percent Projected Budget Change Change Sa lades and Benefits Professional Costs Legal cervices Professional cervices - General Total Professional Costs Swport Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations Engineering Construction qoecial audies Operating and Capital Disbursements Total Projects and Operations Capital Outlay Tra n sfe rs Out TOTAL Rail Maintenance and Operations Rail Staffing Summary Position Administrative Assistant Chief Financial Officer Deputy Executive Director Executive Director External Affairs Director Facilities Administrator IT Administrator Legislative Affairs Manager Management Analyst Multimodal Services Director Procurement Analyst Procurement Manager Project Delivery Director Public Affairs Manager Rail Manager Senior Administrative Assistant Senior Management Analyst $ 755,400 $ 732,700 $ 728,300 79,800 175,000 65,000 1,383,400 4,229,000 2,342,700 1,463, 200 1,891,100 2,658,900 22,800 17,499,700 20,181,400 7,500 $ 24,298,600 4,404,000 2,407,700 3,391,100 2,919,800 2,856,500 250,000 4,009,200 550,000 20, 000, 000 27,665,700 90,000 948,500 $ 37,232,000 2,522,100 200,000 500,000 300,000 19,401,800 22, 923, 900 80,000 908,500 $ 29,968,200 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 0.00 0.15 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.94 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.51 1.00 0.36 0.40 0.24 0.18 0.14 0.18 0.06 0.15 0.02 0.20 1.00 1.00 0.03 0.02 0.91 0.07 FTE 4.30 4.49 Department Budget Overview -Rail Operations Department Description $ 820,900 170,000 3,054,000 3,224,000 3,320,700 2,728,800 3,700,000 250,000 22,100, 000 28, 778, 800 92,500 882,900 $ 37.119.800 FY 18/19 $ 88,200 12% (5,000) -3% (1,175,000) -28% (1,180,000) -27% (70,400) -2 % (127,700) -4% (250,000) -100% (309,200) -8% (300,000) -55% 2,100, 000 11 % 1,113,100 4% 2,500 3% (65,600) -7% $ (112,200) 0% 0.00 0.02 0.10 0.00 0.05 0.90 0.00 0.01 1.00 0.29 0.40 0.20 0.00 0.15 1.00 0.05 0.05 4.22 the Commission directs efforts in the areas of regional commuter rail, intercity paxonger rail, high speed rail, and capital improvements to support enhanced pa -Trager and freight rail service. The entire program includes elements of planning, programming, commuter and intercity rail development and support, station and corridor management, mitigation of community and environmental impacts, legislative and regulatory advocacy, and construction of capital projects. Many elements are managed or supported by other Commission departments, legal counsel, and consultants. Departmental efforts contributing to the rail program are found throughout the budget document. Coordination and consultation also occur with a variety of public and private entities including the California State Transportation Agency, CTC, Caltrans, California Public Utilities Commission, California High Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA), FRA, FTA, Amtrak, environmental agencies, University of California Riverside (UCR), transit providers, SLAG, WRCOG, CVAG, San Diego Association of Governments, LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency, local governments, private freight railroads, businesccs, and property owners. the Commission participates in the ongoing funding and governance of Metrolink through SCRRA, a joint powers authority consisting of the county transportation commissions of Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange, Los Angeles, and Ventura counties. The Commission holds two voting positions on SCRRA's eleven -member board. The role of chair rotates between the member agencies every two years; the Commission'srepresentative currently holdsthat position through 2018. Commission staff serves on the five -county TAC that negotiates%rvice and funding levels, based upon the County's established priorities. the TAC provides technical assistance, coordination between various SCRRA and Commission departments, and linkages to local communities. Of the seven commuter rail lines operated by Metrolink, three routes consisting of the Riverside, Inland Empire -Orange County (IEOC), and 91/PVL directly serve Western County. Unlike the other SCRRA member agencies, the Commission owns and operates the commuter rail stations serving the County: Riverside Downtown, Jurupa Valley — Pedley, Riverside — La Serra, West Corona, Corona —North Main, Riverside —Hunter Park/ UCR, Moreno Valley —March Feld, Perris — Downtown, and Perris — South (Chart 41). The Riverside Downtown Operations Control Center (RDOCC), located at the west end of the Riverside Downtown station, provides monitoring of closed circuit televisions(CCTV) at the stations as well as facilities for train crews. Layover track facilities are located at the Riverside Downtown and Perris — South stations; however, SCRRA maintainsthe layover facilities. Station operation and maintenance costsare included in the Rail Department budget with services currently coordinated by the Capital Projects Development and Delivery Department through the Facilities Administrator. New and ongoing construction projects at these stations are described in the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department. Chart41 —Riverside County Metrolink Station Locations Riverside County Metrolink Service Eastvale Corona • west Station I 15 Corona • North Station Corona Jurupa Valley Norco RCTC Stalions Metrolink Line 121 Jurupa Vale Pedley Station Riverside iverside - Downtown Station Riverside - Hunter Park/ UCR Station Riverside- MorenoValley/ La Sierra Station March Field Station Lake Matthews 15 Perris • Downtown Station 74 RIVERSIDE CO. Moreno Valley Perris Perris • South Station Canyon Lake 6E11E0E00 �ake orris Menifee In addition to Metrolink, the Commission participates in the governance of the LOSSAN Rail Corridor, a 351-mile network through a six -county coastal region in southern California that isthe second busiest intercity pagmnger rail corridor in the United States (Chart 42). the LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency is a joint powers authority originally formed in 1989 to increase ridership, revenue, capacity, reliability, coordination, and safety on the coastal rail line between San Diego, Los Angeles, and San Luis Obispo. the Commission is the newest voting member of the 11-member Board of Directorscompo%d of elected officials representing rail owners, operators, and planning agencies along the rail corridor. In recent years, LOSSAN has gained more local control over the management and coordination of the southern California rail services. lhe Commission is involved to promote travel options and connections for County residents and to be engaged in decisions impacting the rail track rightsthe Commission purchased for commuter rail service. Commission staff also participates in the TAC that provides technical assistance, service planning, and coordination between variousagenciesto improve customerservice. Chart 42 —Southem Ca lifomia Passenger Rail System Map Passenger Rail Slam • Amtrak Poci Ac Swflmer © McFralink Q COASTER Q SPRINTER flight Roil) Passenger Rail Service - Armhok PociFic Suriliner Metralink venlum Caunly Line - Metrolink Anralape VOEIey Line - Morrolink Son Bornerdina Line - Merralink Riverside Line - Mcrroiink 91 Lino - Mob -clink Orange Crony line Melralink Inland Empire - Orange Counly Line - COASTER - SPRINTER jlghf Rail) F?nr1 A..na-v-Friaor RSTER META rJ LI NK AmtdCollonwn corn GdJCla row Southern California Passenger Rail SYSTEM MAP f� r LOS ANGEic5 COLJNiY ✓ N 4"" NNE F.1 �cSJrn'r Cou.�—i n 0 5 10 15 20 30 40 Miles n Key Assum ptions for FY 2018/ 19 • lhe Commission and SCRRA adopt Metrolink's preliminary FY 2018/19 budget. In the event that additional funds are needed during the budget year for Metrolink operations, staff will present a mid -year budget adjustment to the Commission for approval. • Ridership and fare revenues will continue to grow slightly on the Riverside, IEOC, and 91/PVL lines. • 1he 91/PVL extension will continue to grow ridership and provide additional options for the County'scommuters. " LOSSAN will continue to demonstrate itseffectivenesswith local control, and the Commission will be an active voting member in the process. Accomplishments in FY 2017/ 18 " Expanded marketing effortsto establish a ridership base for the PVL and other routesserving Riverside County. " Actively participated asa voting memberon the LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency board. " To promote use of Metrolink for more than the regular commute, provided several successful special trains programs including a record breaking Festival of Lights Program, a new Rose Parade train, and expanded Angelsand Ramssporting eventstrains. Major Initiatives in FY 2018/ 19 Over the last 25 years, the Commission has invested more than $130 million in capital improvementsto develop stationsand secure accessto support the Commission'scommuterrail services operations. lhe PVL project and related projects added over $250 million more to the Commission's investment in commuter rail. the Commission completed the PVL construction, including four new commuter rail stations, and service began in June 2016. Unlike the other SCRRA member agencies, the Commission owns and maintains the nine commuter rail stations and RDOCC serving the County. A general description of each of the Commission -owned rail station facilitiesispresented in Chart 43. Chart 43  Commission-Owned Rail Station Facilities in Service Locution Date Sire Transit Services Primary Features Riverside Downtown (P244001) 4066 Vine Street. Riverside June 1993 26.5 Rail: 91/PVL 2 platforms with 4 boarding tracks - . :7111114-0* acres IEOC Line 4 parking lots (1,24E1 spaces) Riverside Line Enclosed pedestrian bridge, elevators, stairwells u Amtrak Bus: RTA Q'mniTrans Sun+_ine Amtrak Mega Bus furupa Valley-Pedley (P244002) 6001 Pedley Road, Jurupa Valley June 1993 4,5 Rail: Riverside Line Platform with boarding track f +f I acres Bus: RTA Parking lot (28B spaces) i 'Al 2 - ��. f Riverside-ta Sierra (P244003) 10901 Indiana Avenue, Riverside October 24.69 Rail: 91/PVL Platform with 2 boarding tracks _ 1995 acres IEOC tine Parking lot (1,065 spaces) _!��'_:. i Bus: RTA Enclosed pedestrian bridge, elevators, stairwells Corona-West(P244004) 155 South Auto Center Drive, Corona October 5.49 Rail: 91/PVL Platform with 2 boarding tracks 1995 acres 1E0C tine Parking lot (564 spaces) _ iti7.1 Bus: RTA Enclosed pedestrian bridge, elevators, stairwells Corona Cruiser Corona -North Main (P244006) 250 East Blaine Street, Corona November 6.72 Rail: 91/PVL Platform with 2 boarding tracks * 2002 acres 1E0C Line Parking lot (579 spaces) Bus: RTA Parking structure (1,000spaces) Corona Cruiser Enclosed pedestrian bridge, elevators, stairwells Location In Service Sian TransitServfces Primary Features Date Perris -Downtown (P244010) 121 South C Street, Perris June 2016 5.5 Rail: 91/PVL Platform with boarding track mr•• �• F �01 (bus transit acres Bus: RTA Parking lot (444 spaces) center opened Pa �wsawX 2010) Riverside -Hunter Park/UCH (12244020) 1101 Marlborough Avenue, Riverside June 2016 3.35 Rail: 91/PVL Platform with boarding track � _ rrukren Puff[ UCH acres Bus: RTA Parking lot (528 spaces) Moreno Valley/March Field jP244021j 14160 Meridian Parkway, Riverside June 2016 14.47 Rail: 91/PVL Platform with boarding track ...... `.. ; :-.6...-.x.I :rag g YA Ml11iCX Mild FILLIP acres Bus: RTA Parking lot (476 spaces) Amtrak Stairwell Perris -South (P244022) 1304 Case Road, Perris June 2016 40.57 Rail: 91/PVL Platform with boarding track sop I 1 acres Bus: RTA Parking lot (907 spaces) WNW 1 Amtrak '-•• S MIN PERRIS RDOCC (P244024) 4344 Vine Street, Riverside April 2016 3,004 N/A CCTV operations center idillIrefeet �_ �¢_ square offices and meeting roams Station maintenance includes property management, utilities, grounds maintenance, repairs, cleaning, and security services at the Commission -owned rail stations, including the RDOCC. Through FY 2015/16 station operating costs were primarily funded with LTP Western County rail allocations. As a result of the new PVL service, the LTF allocations will be used for Metrolink operating contributions and 2009 Measure A Western County rail funds will be used for station maintenance going forward. Table 62 summarizesthe rail station maintenance costs. Table 62 - Rail Station Maintenance Summary FY 16/ 17 Actual FY 17/ 18 Budget FY17/18 FY18/19 Projected Budget Equipment maintenance and repairs Groundsmaintenance and repairs Utilitiesand support Property management and operations Security Improvements Total expenditures $ 379,885 $ 594,000 $ 550,600 925,489 1,040,500 433,565 501,397 2,181,692 7,450 546,800 1,001,600 2,427,100 85,600 882,100 470,100 1,034,700 2,233,500 80,000 $ 4,429,478 $ 5,695,600 $ 508,700 984,100 527,600 1,138,200 2,382,600 82,500 $ 5,251,000 $ 5,623,700 In FY 2018/19, the Commission anticipates completion of the parking lot and transit center expansion at the Riverside —La Serra station. This major capital improvement will increase park and ride opportunitiesand facilitate commuter busoperationsat the station. Department Goals —Rail Operations Improve utilization and increase efficiency of commuter rail lines serving the County. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Responsible Partnei) Objectives: • Support improved Metrolink system safety and security initiatives. • Implement enhanced safety and security featuresat all stations. • Work with Metrolink staff to increase patronage on the County lines, including the 91/PVL. • Collaborate with Metrolink and member agencies to expand service on Metrolink lines with increased train frequencies. • Coordinate with Metrolink staff to develop future service plans that best meet the needs of the County'sresidents. • Continue to monitor Metrolink's financial performance to ensure efficient and responsible use of the County'stransportation funds. Maximize opportunitiesfor public use of rail -related investment. (Policy Goal: Quality of Life, Responsible Partner) Objectives: • Support transit operator efforts to expand availability and use of connecting transit in order to improve access and reduce demand on parking capacity; currently the Commission budgetsfor and reimbursestransit operatorscostsassociated with transfers. • Build out the Riverside — La Sierra station with additional bus bays and parking to allow for more commuterbusesand park and ride opportunities. • Explore track rightsopportunities. • Expand opportunities with the Commuter Assistance Program's park and ride operations for the designation of specific carpool/vanpool/buspool parking at commuter rail stations with available capacity. • Increase opportunitiesfor interline travel through coordination of scheduleswith LOSS4N and Amtrak intercity trains, such as the &inset Limited, and other Metrolink lines, including encouraging joint ticketing options. Implement energy efficient systems and generate revenue to offset maintenance costs of rail properties. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Explore potential forjoint development opportunitiesat stations. • Evaluate the installation of cell phone towers asa revenue source to offset operating costs, including the development of the Jurupa Valley — Pedley station cell tower project. • Explore additional revenue potential at the rail stations. • Anfrssaltemative and emergency power systems. Department Budget Overview — Rail Development In order to expand pas-Pnger rail options throughout the County, the Commission conducts feasibility studies to amass the viability of commuter rail expansion. In the past the Commission completed the commuter rail feasibility study that examined the viability of extending Metrolink commuter rail service largely within existing rail right of way. The Commission approved the study and recommended advanced study of extensions on the San Jacinto Branch Line (SJBL) to Hemet/San Jacinto and Murrieta/Temecula. The next phase of Alternatives Analysis for these corridors will be pursued in future years. The Commission engaged a consultant to perform a "next generation" rail feasibility study based on findings from the RCTC Strategic Assessment completed in January 2016. Sgnificant planning efforts are also underway to explore intercity parrongerrailservice to the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Passcorridor. San Jacinto Branch Line The Commission holds title to and manages the 38-mile SJBL (Chart 44) and several adjacent properties, preserved for future paxenger rail service. BNSF Railway (BNSF) hold sthe freight rights in the corridor, providing service to local shippers, and performsmaintenance on the line. Chart44—San Jacinto Branch Line San Jacinto Branch Line Lake Matthews }++++ San Jacinto Branch Line Perris Valley Line Service Area RIVERSIDE Co. Callrnesa vmmsimmi Moreno Valley Canyon Lake Banning Beau' Perris VaIle yLine Project The Commission substantially completed the PVL in September 2016, and operations commenced in June 2016. The construction project was a 24-mile extension of the 512-mile Metrolink commuter rail system. It extended the existing Metrolink 91 Line, which provides service between Riverside and Downtown LosAngelesvia Fullerton. There are timed connectionsto the other routes out of the Riverside Downtown station. The project included the construction of four passenger stations at Riverside — Hunter Park/UCR, Moreno Valley/March Feld, Perris — Downtown, and Perris — South; construction of a park -and -ride lot at each of the four new stations, totaling approximately 2,250 parking spaces; and a layover facility at Perris —South for vehicle storage and servicing. The hours of operation are from 4:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdayswith no scheduled service yet on weekends. The service has 12 trainsa day between Perris —South and Riverside Downtown with connectionsto IEOC and Riverside line trainsaswell. COACHELLA VALLEY-- SAN GORGONIO PASS CORRIDOR RAIL SERVICE In recent years the Commission also focused attention on the creation of intercity pamcnger rail service between the Coachella Valley, the Pass Area, Riverside, and the Los Angelesbasin through advocacy effortswith state, federal, and local government entities and negotiation with the freight railroads. The Commission ensured the corridor was prominently featured in the updated 2013 California State Rail Plan. In May 2013, the Caltrans Division of Rail completed the first phase of a planning study and initial alternatives analysis for the rail corridor. This planning study was very supportive of the potential for a viable service, and future studies can expand on this by determining ridership demand and better cost estimates. Caltrans also included an updated project description and analysis of the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail service in the latest state rail plan, approved by the California State Transportation Agency on September 5, 2013. The next update is scheduled for 2018 and initial drafts include the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail service asan integral part of future growth. Snce its inclusion of the project into the State Rail Plan, the Commission has led the planning elements required of the project in order to secure additional funding and project approvals at various state and federal levels. The Commission established a MOU with CVAG for its cooperation on the planning as well as funding through a new TDA bus/rail split for the Coachella Valley. This agreement also included the application of Proposition 1B funds toward the initial Phase 1 analysis that included public outreach, development of the project Purpose and Need Statement, and development of the Preliminary Alternatives Analysis Report. As part of thiseffort, the Commission secured a letter of agreement with Caltransforitscooperation and modeling support. The Commission completed the Phase 1 planning efforts, including the Alternatives Analysis, and the FRA approved the Phase I work. In the July 2010 Federal Register notice on High -Speed Intercity PaeocngerRail (HSIPR) program, it clearly outlinesthe planning process needed to be eligible forHSlPRfunds. This process identifies the need fora SDPwith the following requirements: • Clearly demonstrate the purpose and need; • Analyze alternativesforthe proposed pawcnger rail service; • Identify the alternative that best meetsthe purpose and need; • Identify the discrete capital projects req uired; and • Demonstrate the operational and financial feasibility. To continue the development of this project, the Commission partnered with Caltrans and successfully applied for and was awarded a $2,900,000 FRA grant to complete the corridor study's SDP. This was the only rail corridor in the country awarded these planning grant funds. Staff worked through the multiple agreements needed in order to utilize this funding in coordination with the FRA and Caltrans. In order to expedite project development, a highly qualified consultant will prepare the SDP and lead the environmental process needed for the NEPA documentation. This project is ongoing and incorporated in the FY 2018/19 budget. The Commission prepares an annual SRTP for the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail service project. Asthe result of the many studies performed to date by both CVAG and the Commission, it was determined that using state -supported intercity trains presents the best alternative for developing service along the corridor. The 141-mile trip between LosAngelesand the Coachella Valley would cross four counties (Chart 45). Stops and station locations are yet to be determined. Due to the trip length and time of approximately three hours, Amtrak -style service with larger seats and food service would be more appealing to the riders. In addition, the service would operate over Union Pacific and BNSFtracks, and, in general, Amtrak hasa greater ability to initiate service over freight railroads based on a national agreement. The initial service plan anticipates two daily round trips along the corridor. The approved Altemative Analysis recommended a preferred alignment. Chart 45 —Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass Corridor Rail Service —Proposed Alternative 5i_Ju;lfr Los An es j' V is Scat LA LesAng, 410 r. v 11111,i r. An Ful veameeu u� � rtvu SNR �Pm . Corona Oran` 3t''� . Y 1Si1 w AunOkaa _ guppy side Morena �r 4a71e me Lin¢a °74,—f-'•.— a.m7.7 ,e�rnr.,iya cals.a mono veney :11.1 9;rrJi1P ;4AM ',xe,ninnm ea�,my Ca6a n Desert Hot Spring, Patin6 nos� tJ:l�i1E A v KP ` NM NI yapns VALLI' �1 _ Rancho GlV'-. 11 A.� ponchoag!. India i:Jwatt , Palm Oesert Indian -- �• i }sla WWl Ouln an o M1ella- %�'-- - Thermal ;A 1P.; '174° Palley, LEGEND -Alternative 1 - Potential Stations Idea High *Wed Rail The Commission continues to play a proactive role in the development of a statewide, high speed pass..nger rail system, including routing of the backbone corridor through the Inland Empire with possible stations in the Riverside/Corona and Murrieta/Temecula areas. With the passage of Proposition 1A in November2008, there is proposed funding mechanism to move the state high speed rail project forward. The CHSRA began work on a project level environmental assessment and corridor alignment study for the section between Los Angeles and San Diego via the Inland Empire. The Commission directed the review to include an alignment alternative along 1-15 for analysis. The Commission entered into a MOU to be supportive in the development of this high speed rail project and participates in the Southern California Inland Corridor Group meetings. The Commission actively contributed to the development of the supplemental Alternatives Analysis efforts. Work on this effort has slowed down with the release of the latest business plan that extends the development of this Phase II section from Los Angeles to San Diego via the Inland Empire to beyond 2030. The Commission signed a MOU along with the other southern California transportation entities and SLAG to commit $1 billion in unallocated Proposition 1A fundsfor early investment to be spent locally for rail transportation improvement projects. Key Assumptions for FY 2018/ 19 • Progresson the development of the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Passcorridor rail service will continue. Accomplishments in FY 2017/ 18 • Completed the AltemativesAnalysisfor the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail SDP. • Continued Phase II efforts for the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail project and related environmental process. • Conducted additional public scoping outreach for the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail project. Major Initiatives in FY 2018/ 19 During FY2018/19, the Commission will continue progresson the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Pass corridor rail project's SDP and environmental work. Additionally, the Commission will develop the "next generation" rail feasibility study to evaluate future growth opportunities for pa�rngerrail service in the County. Department Goals -Rail Development Identify and plan for capital improvements necessary to increase the scope, appeal, and reliability of commuter rail operations. (Policy Goals Quality of Life, Operational Excellence, Responsible Partner) Objectives: • Build ridership on the 91/PVL. • Explore panconger rail options and conduct detailed studies on the Coachella Valley -San Gorgonio Passcorridor. • Evaluate high speed rail plans and programs and look for opportunities for early investment that benefit existing paq-Pngerrailservices. • Evaluate future rail needsaspart of the "next generation" rail feasibility study. Maintain efforts with local agencies, other southem Califomia counties, and the state and federal govemmentsto expand intercity passenger rail service into the County and the Coachella Valley. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Responsible Partner) Continue to monitor the state efforts in the creation of a high speed passenger rail system along an Inland Empire alignment through coordination with state and local agencies. In addition, continue to identify and advocate for high speed rail funding to be spent on beneficial local rail projects in the County. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Responsible Partner) Rail Performance/Workload Indicators FY16/17 Estimated FY16/17 Actual FY17/18 Estimated FY18/19 Projected Average daily ridership on existing commuter lines 4,387 4,050 3,795 3,721 • Riverside Line 4,421 4,900 4,599 4,624 • IEOC Line 2,600 3,258 2,925 3,330 • 91/PVL Farebox recovery ratio • Riverside Line 47.7% 47.2% 43.2% 40.5% • IEOC Line 33.4% 31.8% 30.0% 27.5% • 91/PVL 27.7% 26.5% 23.9% 24.6% Public and Specialized Transit Mission Statement: Public and Specialized Transit coordinates the operation of all public transportation services within the County with a goal toward promoting compliance and improving mobility as well as program efficiency and effectiveness between transit operators. Public and Specialized Transit also maintainsand improves, as resourcesallow, mobility optionsto meet travel needsof seniors, persons with disabilities, and persons of limited means to enhance quality of life through innovative solutionsand better coordination of existing services. Chart46—Public and Specialized Transit TransfersOut 15% Projectsand Operations 85 Expenditures Public and specialized transit uses are budgeted at $188,418,700 for FY2018/19, as presented in Table 63, and consist primarily of capital projects and operations costs as well astransfers out to Commission fundsforadministration, planning, and rail purposes. LTF disbursements consist of transit operating and capital allocations to public transit operators of $85,035,000; bicycle and pedestrian facilities allocations to cities and the County of $8,286,000; and planning and administration allocations to other agencies of $717,000. STA disbursements of $52,415,300 are for bus capital purposes in Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley. LTFand STA transfersout comprise: • $21,200,000 for rail operations; • $2,000,000forgrade separations; • $3,969,900 for planning; • $377,600 foradministration; and • $350,000 for Coachella Valley rail operationsand capital. the LTF and STA transit allocations reflect the use of $26,779,000 and $29,471,900 in fund balances, respectively. Measure A disbursements include $2,800,000 for Western County specialized transit funding of the first year of the 2018 Call for Projects. The majority of other Measure A disbursements relates to other Measure A public transit programs: • $850,000 for Western County Consolidated Transportation Service Agency (CTSA) allocations; • $5,500,000 for Coachella Valley public and specialized transit; and • $3,700,000 for Western County intercity bus%rvices. The Western County allocations are disbursed monthly to RTA, the major transit provider in the Westem County, while the Coachella Valley allocation isdisbursed monthly to ainLine, the major transit provider in the Coachella Valley. Transfers out of $389,800 relate to administrative coststo the General fund. Table 63 -Public and Specialized Transit Expenditure Detail FY 16/ 17 Actual FY 17/18 Revised Budget FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Dollar Percent Projected Budget Change Change allariesand Benefits Professional Costs Legal rvices Audit Services Financial Advisory Professional cervices- General Total Professional Costs flipport Costs Projects and Operations Operating and Capital Disbursements Transfers Out TOTAL Public and apecialized Transit $ 366,800 $ 415,500 4,100 33,100 12,700 76,900 126,800 39,400 82,265,500 21,786,700 $ 104,585,200 Public and Specialized Transit Staffing Position Accountant Administrative Assistant Chief Financial Officer Executive Director External Affairs Director Management Analyst MultimodaI Services Director Senior Management Analyst Transit Manager FTE 2.57 2.33 Department Budget Overview 14,000 20,000 15,000 155,300 204,300 88,700 122,010,600 24,934,200 $ 147,653,300 $ 397,700 $ 450,200 $ 34,700 5,000 15,300 151,500 171,800 53,800 104,281,700 24,786,400 $ 129,691,400 Department Description Summary FY 16/17 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.28 0.00 1.00 FY 17/18 0.00 0.05 0.03 0.01 0.00 1.00 0.22 0.02 1.00 6,000 100,000 16,000 192,000 314,000 63,900 159,303,300 28,287,300 $ 188,418,700 FY 18/19 0.02 0.14 0.03 0.00 0.01 1.00 0.31 0.00 1.00 2.51 (8,000) 80,000 1,000 36,700 109,700 (24,800) 37,292,700 3,353,100 $ 40,765,400 8% -57 400 7% 24 54 -28% 31% 13% 28% The Commission is responsible for short-range transportation planning and programming within the County. Planning includes the development of the countywide a-clNsfor eight public transit operatorsconsisting of: • The citiesof Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and Riverside; • 9CRRA'sMetrolinkcommuter rail; • PVVTA; • RTA; and • ainLine. The Commission assists in coordinating the annual development, review, and approval of the operator SRTPs as well as allocates Measure A, LTF, STA, and FTA transit funding resources to public transit programs. The Commission disburses LTF, STA including SB 1 SGR and Measure A fundsfor public transit. The FTA administersthe traditional Section 5307 (urban) and Section 5311 (rural) transit grant programs, while SCAG directly administers new FTA grant programs, Section 5337for state of good repair and Section 5339 for busand busfacilities. In July 2012, Congress pasted the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) two- year reauthorization bill that authorized federal funding for public transportation programs. This legislation restructured prior funding by consolidating several grant programs, revising project eligibility, and amending funding allocation req uirements from discretionary to a formula -based process. Under the new long-term transportation bill, FASTAct, signed into law on December4, 2015, Jobs Access Reverse Commute and New Freedom type projects continue to be eligible activitiessupported with FTA Section 5307, Section 5311, and Section 5310 funding. Following a competitive call for projects, funding through the consolidated FTA Section 5310 program administered by Caltrans is provided to nonprofit transportation and social service agencies and public operators (under special circumstances) for the purchase of capital equipment as well as operations. Eligible activities include transportation projects for finance planning, capital, and operating costs that support the development and maintenance of transportation services designed to transport welfare recipients and eligible low-income individuals to and from jobs and activities related to their employment. these activities also include transportation projects that facilitate the provision of public transportation services from urbanized areas and rural areas to suburban employment locations including vanpool programs. Additional activities include: • Former New Freedom activities related to improvements that exceed the requirements of the Americanswith Disabilities Act (ADA); • Public transportation projectsto improve accessto fixed -route transit; • Public transit projects expressly designed for seniors and people with disabilities, where transit isinsufficient, inappropriate or unavailable; and • Altemativesto public transportation that assist seniorsand people with disabilities. Eligibility for the FTA Section 5310 fundsrequiresrecipientsto comply with all federal coordinated planning requirements in accordance with MAP-21 and the new FASTAct provisions. Projects selected for funding must be derived from a locally -developed Coordinated Public Transit — Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan) and must be developed through a process that includes representatives of the public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human service providers. The Commission's recommendationsfor award are subject to Caltrans approval. Projects will be fully funded with federal funds using Transportation Development Credits (toll credits) as matching funds. In partnership with the County's transit operators, the Commission coordinates the allocation of available state Proposition 1B transit funding and ensures that proposed projects meet the mobility needs of the County. Annually appropriated by the legislature, Proposition 1Bfunds are used for transit related capital purchases, infrastructure/facility improvements, and security enhancements. Since FY 2007/08, the County's public transit operators annually applied for Proposition 1B funds; however, the program ended in FY 2016/17 and operators programmed the remaining balances in FY 2017/18. Operators must expend these funds within three fiscal yea rs. Since 2015, the Commission coordinates with Riverside County transit operators the preparation and submission of transit projects to Caltrans for award of LCTOP funds under CARB's Cap and Trade Program. The LCTOP funds support operating and capital transit projects that reduce carbon emissions and improve mobility with a priority of serving disadvantaged communities. The State Controller's Office annually appropriates the LCTOP funds. Riverside County's share supported the construction of RTA's UCR Mobility Hub, station upgrades for the Commission's new PVL to encourage active transportation, and installation and operation of a solar energy system in Palo Verde Valley. Funds will also be used to increase service frequency on selected bus routes that operate in disadvantaged communities in the Coachella Valley and city of Beaumont. The County's share of the annual allocations have fluctuated based on state appropriations. The 2009 Measure A Western County specialized transit program provides valuable service to the community by serving the needs of residents, mainly seniors and persons with disabilities, whose transportation needs are not met by traditional services. Social service and nonprofit agencies typically administer specialized transit operations. The Commission awards 2009 Measure A Western County funds for specialized transit through a competitive call for projects. The 2015 Call for Projects, which provided funding for a three-year term, will end in June 2018. Under the new 2018 Call for Projects, Measure A funds will be utilized by projects until June 30, 2021. The Commission has public transit operator oversight and fiduciary responsibilities and ensures that annual fiscal auditsand a state triennial performance audit are conducted in accordance with TDA regulations. The Commission also reviews public transit operator activitieson an annual basis and recommends potential productivity improvementsto lower operating costs. To ensure that specialized transit allocations are expended in accordance with funding agreements, the Commission engagesaudit firmsto perform certain agreed -upon proceduresfor the Measure A specialized transit funding recipients. Key Assumptions for FY 2018/ 19 • LTF, STA, and Measure A budgeted disbursements are based on projected allocations but may be adjusted afterthe Commission approvesactual allocationsin July 2018. • Fluctuating LTFand Measure A salestax revenueswill continue to require effortsto streamline operating expensesby all operatorswhile maintaining efficiency and quality of service. • The Commission will allocate Westem County LTFand discretionary STA funds based on a split of 78% fo r b us a nd 22%for rail. • The Commission will continue to allocate 25%of 2009 Measure A Western County specialized transit fundsto RTA asthe CTsq for Western County. Accomplishments in FY 2017/ 18 • Oversaw the successful third -year implementation of the ongoing specialized transit services resulting from the 2015 Measure A Call for Projectsfunding allocation process. • Assisted in the implementation of 29 capital projects awarded to ten successful County recipients under the FTA Section 5310 program FY2012/13 and FY2013/14 funding; projects were derived from the locally -developed Coordinated Plan. • Received approval notification of 17 capital projects awarded to nine successful County recipients of FTA Section 5310 urbanized area program FY 2014/15, FY 2015/16 and FY 2016/17 funding, in addition to three capital projects from two small urban and rural agencies. • Approved the allocation of FY2017/18 SB 1 Rprogram fundsfor eligible replacement and rehabilitation projects identified by transit operators following release of program funding and guidelinesby Caltrans. • Completed the Coordinated Plan Update that reflects new service plans and opportunities resulting from five workshops and one transit needs public hearing held in different areas of the County including unincorporated areas of Mecca and North Shore in eastern Riverside County. • Incorporated FY 2016/17 LCTOP formula funds with transit operating and capital funding sources for development of the FY 2018/19 S1-t11's following the Caltrans release of program funding. Major Initiatives in FY 2018/ 19 The Commission has long demonstrated a strong commitment to assist in the mobility of those with specialized transit needs. Through its 1989 Measure A specialized transit program, the Commission provided millions of dollarsto public and nonprofit transit operatorsfor the provision of special transit services to improve the mobility of seniors and persons with disabilities. Along with support of traditional dial -a -ride services, the Commission supports innovative programsthat provide transit assistance in hard to serve rural areas or for riders having very special transit needs. The riders, many frail and elderly, have come to depend on these servicesthat provide a higher level of assistance than can be provided by the public transit providersand/or operate in areas not served by public transit. As a result of the 2009 Measure A, these specialized transit programswill continue through 2039. In June 2018, 16 programs in Westem County will complete their third year of specialized transit services under the 2015 Measure A Call for Projects. The Commission approved specialized transit award in April 2018 for 18 programs in Western County under the 2018 Measure A Call for Projects. As identified in the Coordinated Plan, the specialized transit projects approved for funding will require implementation and continuousperformance monitoring through June 2021. The Commission adopted the Transit Vision for 2009-2019 in May 2008 that included continuation of the TDA funding formula for LTFand STA funds and established a funding formula for the 2009 Measure A public transit funds, which include specialized transit funds. In FY 2018/19, staff will submit recommendations to the Commission for changes, if any, to the TDA and Measure A funding formulasand an implementation plan. Department Goals Provide timely information to the public regarding Commission -implemented projects and support public relations activities of Measure A funded programs by grant recipients. (Policy Goals: Operating Excellence, Responsible Partne4 Objectives: • Produce and distribute public information materials as needed including press releases, flyers, brochures, marketing materials, and newspaper ads. • Leverage the IE Commuter traveler information system in order to more fully market the availability of specialized transit programs. Allocate Measure A specialized transit and federal funds to support services that will maintain and/or enhance mobility by alleviating transportation barriers for seniors, persons with disabilities, and the truly needy. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Operational Excellence, Responsible Partner) Objectives: • Monitor performance of specialized transit grant recipients through analysis of their monthly performance reports. • Support the consolidated FTA Section 5310 grant process to improve mobility for seniors, persons with disabilities and individuals of limited means by working with Caltrans, public operators, and social service agencies to ensure a competitive process statewide for the allocation of federal transportation dollarsfor social service programs. • Provide technical assistance and program support to agencies offering specialized transit programs to ensure the maximum benefit of funding for improved mobility for seniors, personswith disabilities, and individualsof limited means. Coordinate the operation of all public transportation services within the County with a goal toward promoting program efficiency and harmony between transit operators as outlined in state law. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Operational Excellence, Connecting the Economy, Responsible Partner) Objectives: • Review transit planning, resource allocation, and service implementation policy requirements including appropriate coordination of commuter rail, intercounty and intercity bus, local bus and paratransit, and social service transportation services to ensure convenient service for passengers. • Implement recommendationsresulting from the lDA-mandated triennial performance audits of the Commission and the seven County bustransit operators. • Assure the ongoing effectiveness of the SRTPprocessand work with the County'seight transit operators to assure productivity and efficiency as well as compliance with the productivity improvement program. • Coordinate regional transit connections among commuter rail, buses, and paratransit servicesto ensure convenient service for paggongers. • Monitortransit operators' quarterly capital grantsreports. • Monitor transit operators' performance through analysis of their quarterly performance reports using the TransTrackcomputer-based tracking program. • Continue initiative working with the transit operator partners in providing connecting bus servicesto the new PVLstations. Continue to provide staff resources to assist and support the coordination of transit services within the County and throughout the State. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Operational Excellence, Connecting the Economy, Responsible Partne0 Objectives: • Participate and influence intercounty discussions between Riverside, Orange, San Diego, and San Bernardino counties regarding the enhancement of intermodal options. lhis includesadditional transit services(rail and expressbus) and rideshare services. • Regularly participate in meetings that focus on the coordination of transit services, such as the California Association for Coordinated Transportation, am Line's Access Committee, RTA's ADA Committee, the Riverside County Foundation on Aging Board of Directors, Riverside Regional Coalition, and the Commission's Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Service Transportation Advisory Council. • Continue the development of a marketing and distribution network for communicating specialized transit mobility optionsto seniors, the disabled, and personsof limited means. Public and Specialized Transit Performance/Workload Indicators FY16/17 Estimated FY16/17 Actual FY17/18 Estimated FY18/19 Projected SR1Pssubmitted by operatorsand reviewed 9 9 9 9 STPamendments 3 3 3 3 Specialized Transit grantsawarded 17 17 17 18 One-way tripsprovided by Measure A funded projects 103,952 106,843 111,945 270,500 One-way trips provided by FTA Section 5310 funded projects 93,464 95,929 95,000 96,000 One-way tripsreimbursed through the Western County Transportation Reimbursement and Information Project by Measure A funded projects 38,570 55,180 39,600 71,181 One-way tripsreimbursed through the Western County Transportation Reimbursement and Information Project by FTA Section 5310 98,910 55,172 99,500 88,785 Transit tickets provided through the Transportation Access Program 70,000 31,377 91,019 88,785 Clientsserved through Blindnessaipport Services 54 42 54 36 Unique personsserved through Vetlink 211 Services 1,930 1,654 2,600 1,600 CommuterAssistance Mission Statement: Commuter Assistance actively works to improve the commuter experience by promoting multimodal transportation options through advancing technology, employer partnerships, user incentives, and meaningful community engagement. Chart 47— Commuter Assistance Tra n sfe rs Out 27%_ Expenditures Salariesand Benefits 5% Projectsand Operations 55% Professiona I Costs 7% Sap port Costs 6% Commuter Assistance expenditures total $6,197,800, which represents a 6% increase from last year's budget (Table 64) due to costs for a new vanpool incentive program. Salaries and benefits of $288,200 reflect a 9%increase due to a change in FfEallocations, the Commission's contribution to employee health benefits, and merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $449,700 decreased 44% over the prior year due to completion of ridematching system enhancements and vanpool incentive program implementation. SLpport costs of $342,500, which include mail and printing services, communications, and other office expenditures, increased 33%due to the new vanpool project. Projectsand operationsexpendituresof $3,420,900 consist of: • Park and ride lease paymentsof $150,000; • Regional transportation consultant services totaling $2,172,000 to manage and implement the program; and • Commuter incentivesand subsidiesvouchersvalued at $1,098,900. Reimbursements from SBCTA for rideshare services provided by the Commission are included in revenues to offset a portion of these expenditures. Transfers out include $1,500,000 for a transit incentive project in Western County and $196,500 for administrative costs. Table 64- Commuter Assistance Uses Detail FY 16/17 Actual FY 17/18 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Dollar Percent Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salaries and Benefits Profe ssio na I Costs Legal cervices Financial Advisory Professional cervices - General Total Professional Costs amport Costs Projects and Operations Program Operations Transfers Out TOTALCommuterAssistance $ 257,000 $ 264,800 $ 264,400 21,800 25,000 7,600 7,600 329,600 767,100 359,000 799,700 57,100 257,400 31,000 7,600 668,600 707,200 247,200 2,013,000 2,821,100 2,642,100 1,712,300 1,048,000 $ 2,686,100 $ 5,855,300 $ 4,908,900 $ 288,200 31,000 8,000 410,700 449,700 342,500 3,420,900 1,696,500 $ 6,197,800 Commuter Assistance Staffing Summary Position FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Chief Financial Officer 0.00 0.00 Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager 0.65 0.60 Deputy Executive Director 0.01 0.02 IT Administrator 0.00 0.01 Legislative Affairs Manager 0.04 0.00 Management Analyst 0.31 0.30 Multimodal Services Director 0.28 0.30 Procurement Analyst 0.00 0.05 Procurement Manager 0.01 0.05 Public Affairs Manager 0.00 0.00 Senior Administrative Assistant 0.06 0.05 Senior Management Analyst 0.01 0.03 FTE 1.37 1.41 Department Budget Overview Department Description 0.01 0.65 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.02 1.63 $ 23,400 9% 6,000 24% 400 5 % (356,400) -46% (350,000) -44°% 85,100 33 % 599,800 21% (15,800) -1 % $ 342,500 6% While much of the Commission's work focuses on enhancing transportation infrastructure, there is significant value in ensuring that the transportation systems are used efficiently. To foster a more efficient use of these systems, the Commission's Commuter Assistance Program seeks to increase the awareness of all commute options and incentives available to County constituents and commuters and to increase consideration for alternative modesof transportation such asa riding a busor train, carpooling, vanpooling, walking, bicycling, ortelecommuting. The Commuter Assistance Program seeks to influence driver behavior by nurturing a mode - shifting decision at both the employer and commuter levelsvia the following methods: • Partner with employers and provide them with a suite of services to implement an employer -based mode -shift and rideshare programs at worksites throughout the region; • Provide public information services for rideshare across multiple platforms - IECommuter.org, 866-RIDES-IARE, mobile application, and social media; • Produce personalized commute options and traveler information to educate commuters of all travel options available and to adopt congestion avoidance behaviorwhen traveling; • Incentivize commuters for beginning and then maintaining a mode-shift/rideshare arrangement; and • Leverage technology to deliver easy -to -use online resources and toolsto serve more efficiently employer partners, their employees, and other commuters. The Commission implemented the Commuter Assistance Program in Western County as a specific requirement under Measure A to addresscongestion mitigation. While ridesharing hasa beneficial impact on air quality, first and foremost, it is a strategy to improve mobility through increased use of alternative modesof transportation. Key Assumptions for FY 2018/ 19 • The Commission will continue to contract with a consulting firm to administer an Inland Empire Commuter Assistance Program with regional reach. • Maintaining its long-term partnership with the Commission, SBCTA will contract with the Commission to manage and implement a "sister" Commuter Assistance Program for its residentsand employersin San Bernardino County. Accomplishments in FY 2017/ 18 • Launched a new vanpool subsidy program in Riverside County to compliment transit options in the County and provide an attractive commute option for commuters traveling to Riverside County worksites. • Developed a new IE Commuter mobile application to enhance accessibility of rideshare information and convenience to participate in incentive programs that can be completed online and acrossmobile platforms. • Funded and provided outreach support for a new and rapidly growing RTA CommuterLink Express Bus service (Route 200 and Route 205) between the Inland Empire and Orange County. • Enhanced the IE Commuter rideshare system with a website refresh including a new design and on-line resources and tools for employers to more effectively manage employee commutersand market rideshare within theirorganizations. • Expanded IE Commuter outreach across social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram) to help efficiently grow the direct -to -commuter model and accompanying introduction to new employersfor partnering opportunities. • Coordinated with regional rideshare partnersand transit agenciesto deploy a shared theme acrosssouthem California for Rdeshare Week; Riverside/San Bernardino County participation metricsfarexceeded those of neighboring regions. • Continued leasesfor park and ride facilitiesat the following locations: Canyon Community Church of the Nazarene Living Truth Christian Fellowship Corona FriendsChurch Tom's Farms Lake Elsinore Lake Elsinore Market Lake Elsinore Outlets Shepherd of Life Menifee The View Church Murrieta Mulligan'sFamily Fun Center ji Promise Lutheran Church Temecula Orchard Christian Fellowship United Methodist Church Major Initiatives in FY 2018/ 19 A cornerstone of the Commuter Assistance Program isitscontinued partnership with commuters, employers, and government. The partnership, based on voluntary efforts, makes a collective difference to increase the efficiency of the County's transportation system —local roads, freeways, commuter rail, and public bus. The combined effort results in less congestion, decreased vehicle miles traveled, and improved air quality. The major initiatives to continue these partnershipsand effortsin FY2018/19 are described below. • Conduct a arategic Assessment: The Commuter Assistance Program will take a comprehensive look at the current program structure, incentives, technology, outreach/approach with consideration of the rapidly changing future of mobility (e.g., autonomousvehicles, micro -transit, shared mobility, and transportation network companies). In doing so, the goal is to reasscss and redefine Commission's transportation demand management role in the County. Accordingly, initiating plans and beginning to restructure for the future will further enhance the program and capitalize on opportunities within the changing landscape of mobility. • Maximize Employer Partnerships Given that the highest percentage of rideshare arrangements is formed at work sites, voluntary employer participation is critical to address congestion and air quality goals; employers are the conduit to directly influence their employees' personal transportation choices. The ongoing success of the core Western County rideshare program is a testament to the significance of employer partnerships. However, the prior economic downturn created a corporate culture of doing more with less. Many employer transportation coordinators(Elus) feel spread too thin to commit to offering a rideshare program. Delivery of value-added services and tools to make the ETC's job easier isa critical motivation to continue partnershipsand develop new ones. • Expand with New Market Development: The primary go -to -market strategy has been to leverage larger employer (250+) partnerships to cost effectively access and market to employee commuters. While this channel has historically proven to be efficient over the years, it results in a rather limited base of commuters compared to the broader universe of commuters available. Therefore, in addition to maximizing the number of employer partners and maximizing rideshare participation within those employers, a direct business -to - consumer strategy will continue to be phased in to expand the awareness and consideration of rideshare options. • Support Multimodal Travel: In addition to ridematching, information services, and incentives to facilitate ridesharing, the Commuter Assistance Program also provides park and ride facilities to support ridesharing efforts. The last Caltrans park and ride facility in the County was built in 1999. The Commission leases park and ride spaces from property owners to supplement the network of park and ride spaces in the County. A continued focus for FY 2018/19 will be increasing the number of leased spaces and coordinating with ridesharers, transit, and rail partners to identify areas where the lease program can help support car/vanpool arrangementsand facilitate transit connections. Department Goals Operate a cost-effective Commuter Assistance Program resulting in a demonstrable reduction in single occupant vehicle trips, thus assisting with congestion mitigation and improving air quality. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Responsible Partned Objectives: • Leverage Commuter Assistance Program resources to support outreach and transportation demand management objectivesof major Commission projects, including but not limited to, the new vanpool subsidy program and RTA CommuterLink Express Route 200 and Route 205 service, Metrolink's91/PVLservice, and RCTC 91 Express Lanes. • Continue to enhance the IE Commuter user experience with improvements in functionality and servicesoffered through the website and mobile application. • Continue to offer short-term incentives for commuters to try a transportation mode other than driving alone. " Continue to provide a rewards program for long-term ridesharers to encourage their continued use of alternative modesof transportation. " Ensure the effectivenessof the Commuter Assistance Program through program analysisand recurring arressments of participation and retention of ridesharers. The Commission will continue to evaluate options to trim program costs without impacting service delivery or participation. " Increase participation and use of the IE Commuter website by employer partners to reduce administrative costs. " Optimize the number of leased park and ride spacesand addressgapsin the system. Ensure the coordination of ridesharing programs throughout the Inland Empire and the southern California region. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Operational Excellence, and Responsible Partner) Objectives: " Continue to administer "sister" Commuter Assistance Program in San Bernardino County on a contract basis, thus expanding the reach and effectiveness of commuter programs throughout the Inland Empire area. " Continue to provide leadership with the ongoing operation, maintenance, and enhancement of the bi-county ridematching system with regional reach. " Continue to explore and implement opportunities to coordinate regional rideshare/transit campaignswith neighboring rideshare agenciesand transit partners. Broaden the reach of the program to encourage altemative transportation modes amongst all travelers and continue to grow the core base of employers and their employees. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Operational Excellence, Responsible Partner) Objectives: " Continue to grow and support on-line resources and tools for employers to more effectively manage and market theirorganizations rideshare programs. " Provide program resultsto both commuter incentive participantsand employer partnersthat translate individual or worksite rideshare participation into money saved, congestion reduced, and emissionsreduced. " Publicize the participation of local employers in the Commuter Assistance Program through variousmedia channels. Commuter Assistance Performance/Workload Indicators FY16/17 Estimated FY16/17 Actual FY17/18 Estimated FY18/19 Projected Numberof one-way single occupant vehicle trips reduced asa result of Rideshare Incentives 150,000 166,535 171,000 176,000 Numberof Rideshare Plus Rewards Members 3,000 1,608 1,700 1,800 Number of incoming 1-866-RIDESHAREtelephone calls 5,500 5,231 5,340 5,440 Numberof servicesprovided by IECommuterto support employer trip reduction efforts at worksites: " Employer worksites requesting survey services 125 172 177 182 " RideGuidesproduced 15,000 11,924 12,100 12,400 M oto rist Assista nc e Mission Statement: Motorist Assistance improves safety, reduces congestion, and enhances access to traveler information for motoriststhrough the provision of a comprehensive motorist aid system. Chart 48 — Motorist Assista nc e Transfers Out 38 % Expenditures Salaries and Benefits Professional Costs 2% 5% Sapport Costs 3% Projects a nd Operations 52 % Motorist Assistance expenditures and uses are budgeted at $10,006,400, an increase of 68% compared to the prior year budget (Table 65) due to Fa' service expansion and increased SAFE matching funds for FSP services. Salaries and benefits reflect an increase of 30% due to net changes to FTE allocations, the Commission's contribution to employee health benefits, and merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $528,200 reflect an increase of 2% due to FSP service expansion, and support costs of $290,000 decreased $8,900, or 3%, due to a reduced number of call boxes to support and maintain. Reimbursement from SBCTA for half of all 1E511 related expendituresisincluded in revenues. Budgeted expenditures for program operations include $4,203,000 in towing contract costs for the PS" program. Projectsand operationscostsincreased 39%due to an increase in construction FSP activity. Transfers out represent SAFE matching funds of $3,600,000 for FSP services and a $220,500 allocation for administrative costs. Table 65 — Motorist Assistance Uses Detail FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Salades and Benefits $ 126,000 $ 154,000 $ 153,000 Professional Costs Legal S rvices 19,500 35,500 18,500 ProfessionaIServices- General 386,000 482,500 441,700 Total Professional Costs 405,500 518,000 460,200 Sapport Costs 388,600 298,900 155,000 Projects and Operations Program Operations 3,257,100 3,723,000 3,254,000 Transfers Out 1,068,400 1,257,500 1,257,500 TOTAL Motorist Assstance $ 5,245,600 $ 5,951,400 $ 5,279,700 $ 200,000 30,500 497,700 528,200 290,000 5,167, 700 3,820,500 $ 10,006,400 $ 46,000 30 % (5,000) -14% 15,200 3% 10,200 2% (8,900) -3% 1,444,700 39% 2,563,000 204% $ 4,055,000 68% Motorist Assistance Staffing Summary Position FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager 0.35 0.40 0.35 External Affairs Director 0.00 0.00 0.08 IT Administrator 0.00 0.02 0.00 Legislative Affairs Manager 0.09 0.00 0.05 Management Analyst 0.21 0.70 0.40 Multimodal Services Director 0.07 0.08 0.07 Procurement Analyst 0.05 0.05 0.07 Procurement Manager 0.01 0.05 0.05 Public Affairs Manager 0.00 0.00 0.05 Senior Administrative Assistant 0.00 0.00 0.05 Senior Management Analyst 0.02 0.06 0.02 FTE 0.80 1.36 1.19 Department Budget Overview Department Description Asa SUE, the Commission is responsible for providing a motorist aid system for the County. This system iscomprised of three components: • lhe 1E511 traveler information system isa telephone, website, and mobile app-based service that delivers real-time traffic information, including incidentsand travel times, bus and rail trip planning, and rideshare information; • the FP program clears debris in freeway lanes and assists stranded motorists on the most congested Riverside County freeways by towing, changing flat tires, and temporarily taping cooling system hoses at no charge to motorists. FP service is also provided in construction zones through separate funding agreements with Caltrans and Commission -funded construction projectsto help mitigate congestion; and • the call box system allows motorists to call for assistance in the event of a mechanical breakdown, accident, or other emergency on the freeway. Key Assumptions for FY 2018/ 19 • In partnership with regional county transportation partners, the Commission will transition from a locally -provided 1E511 system to a regional southern California 511 solution. • the FSPwill continue aslong asstate funding support isavailable • Tow truck contractor costs for the nine existing FP beats will be based on Commission - approved contracts. • the call box system program will continue to serve as "safety -net" for stranded motorists in the County. • Annual call box maintenance costs will be based on a flat -fee contract based on the number of call box units. • Current percentage levels of vandalism, knockdowns, and miscellaneous repairs to call boxeswill remain consistent with the past year. Accomplishments in FY 2017/ 18 • Achieved one of the highest benefit -to -cost ratio statewide for FSP in the latest statewide FP Management Information System Report. " Secured and leveraged grant funding to provide weekend FSPservice throughout the SR91 corridor in Corona and Riverside and along a segment of SR60 in Moreno Valley. " Provided traveler information service through the 1E511 system to support more than 46,000 monthly IE511.org web visitsand 16,000 monthly 1E511 phone calls. To date, more than 61,000 usershave downloaded the 1E511 mobile application. " Continued to coordinate with local transportation agenciesto migrate the 1E511 system to a regional traveler information system. " Continued the "cost recovery" program for call box knockdowns in an effort to collect reimbursementsfrom motoristsinvolved in accidentsthat damage Commission property. Major Initiatives in FY 2018/ 19 Since 2010, the Commission, along with its partner, SBCTA, has operated, maintained, and enhanced the 1E511 system which includes a website interface and an interactive voice response telephone system that serves Riverside and San Bernardino counties residents and commuters. While the system has served local commuters garnering an average of 46,000 monthly web visits and 16,000 monthly calls plus 61,000 mobile app downloads to date, the program will transition to a regional and more cost effective 511 solutions in partnership with local southern California transportation agencies. Other initiativeswillfocuson long-term SAFE planning, system efficiencies, and evaluating and/or implementing new program services such as a mobile call box program. Staff will focus on maintaining a high benefit -to -cost ratio for FP and maximize anticipated SB 1 funding to expand FSPcoverage. Department Goals Provide efficient delivery of a comprehensive motorist aid system (511, FSP, Call Box) and an outstanding level of service to the traveling public. (Pblicy Goals: Quality of Life, Operational Excellence, Responsible Partner) Objectives: " Reduce 511 costsand enhance accessto real-time traveler information bytransitioning to a regional 511 southern California solution. " Support local venuesand attractionswith the implementation of expanded FSP%rvice hours to optimize traffic flow related to the arrival and departure of regional traffic to large scale eventsin the Coachella Valley. " Maximize available FP funding by continually evaluating opportunities to provide more efficient FSPcoverage through changes in service days, service hours, or number of vehicles assigned to each beat. " Deploy new FP service with anticipated SB 1 funding to areas along the 1-15 and 1-215 corridors in southern Riverside County that are projected to provide the greatest benefit/impact. " Review proposed construction projects with Commission, Caltrans, and local cities and coordinate the use of temporary construction tow service to mitigate congestion. " Continue coordination with San Bernardino SAFE to monitor the operation of the call answering centercontractor. Motorist Assistance Performance/Workload Indicators FY 16/ 17 Estimated FY 16/ 17 Actual FY 17/ 18 Estimated FY 18/ 19 Projected Numberof call boxes 250 240 240 240 Number of call box calls 2,246 2,650 2,074 2,200 Number of vehicle assists 37,500 40,180 38,904 40,000 Numberof 511 phone calls 211,000 201,099 162,000 186,000 Numberof 511 web visits 497,000 562,507 425,000 425,000 Capital Project Development and Delivery Mission Statement: Capital Project Development and Delivery (Capital Projects) keeps the Commission's contract with the voters of the County by accelerating the planning, programming, and implementation of projects and programs in the Measure A Transportation Improvement Plan, as enhanced by the Toll Program, to the extent that funds are available. Capital Projects ensures that capital projectsare environmentally acceptable, expertly designed, and implemented in a cost effective manner. Capital Projects acquires and manages required right of way in the fairest, most economical, efficient, and timely manner possible. Chart 49 —Capital Project Development and Delivery Salariesand Benefits 1% Tra n sfe rs� Out 16% Debt Service 9% CapitalOutlay 1% Expenditures Pro fe ssio n a I Costs 1% Projectsand Operations 72% The budgeted expend itures and transfers out total $746,914,200 to coverall of the Commission's major capital projects(Table 66). Salariesand benefitsexpenditures represent lessthan 1%of the budgeted uses and reflectsa net increase of 6%due to the net allocation of FTEs, an increase to the Commission's contribution to employee health benefits, and merit -based salary increases. Professional costs of $8,723,600 primarily relate to general legal costs, specialized legal and financial advisory services related to the toll program, public communications, and property management services. Support costsof $632,700 consist primarily of services needed to maintain the Commission'sreal propertiesin a condition that complieswith all local codesand regulations governing property maintenance. General project costs of $5,564,800 comprise program management provided by Bechtel Infrastructure (Bechtel) and permitsfor highway and rail capital projects. Significant projects included in engineering expenditures of $33,113,800 relate to the 1-15 Express Lanes southern extension project; Mid County Parkway; the 71/91 connector project; the I- 15/Railroad Canyon Interchange (on behalf of the city of Lake Osinore); various commuter rail improvement and rehabilitation projects; and various Western County TUMF regional arterial projects. Construction expend itures of $111,950,000 primarily relate to the 1-15 Express Lanes project; 15/91 Express Lanes connector project; the I-15/Limonite interchange; SR60 Truck Climbing Lanes; the Pachappa underpass; various Western County Measure A and lUMF regional arterial projects; Santa Ana River Trail; and rail improvement and rehabilitation projects. Design -build costs of $188,565,500 pertain to the 1-15 Express Lanes project and the 15/91 Express Lanesconnector project. Right of way expend ituresof $91,965,600 on significant projectsinclude the 91 Project; 1-15 Express Lanes project; 71/91 connector project; Mid County Parkway (I-215/Placentia interchange); McKinley Avenue grade separation project; and various Western County IUMF regional arterial projects. Funding will also be provided for MS-ICP land mitigation. Local tumback payments to jurisdictions and the County for local streets and roads repair, maintenance, and construction amount to $56,951,500. Disbursements to CVAG for the 2009 Measure A Coachella Valley highway and regional arterial program comprise substantially all of the regional arterial expenditures. the Planning and Programming Department monitors the eligibility for locals streets and roads funding and reviews reimbursement claims for Coachella Valley highway and regional arterial program expenditures. Special studies of $50,000 relate to the Perris Valley Line. Operating and capital d isbursements of $15,750,000 will be made for commuter rail station rehabilitation costs. Rail capital purchasesfor station rehabilitation projectsrepresent 92%of the capital outlay expenditures. Interest payments on outstanding sales tax revenue bonds (2010B Bonds, 2013 Sales Tax Bonds, 2016 Refunding Bonds, 2017A Bonds, 2017B Bonds, and 2018 Bonds) are $43,590,700. the Commission will make principal payments of $25,965,000 for the outstanding sales tax revenue bonds. Significant tran4ersout consist of the following: • $16,983,500 in salestax debt proceedsto fund the 91 Project completion; • $28,061,000 in salestax revenue bond proceedsto fund the 1-15 ExpressLanesproject; • $69,555,700 from 2009 Measure A Western County highway fund to the Debt Service fund for salestax revenue bondsdebt service; • $5,163,700 from Measure A and IUMF for the allocation of administrative costs to the General fund; • $3,000,000 from 2009 Measure A Western County highway fund to the Debt Service fund for the 1-15 Express Lanesproject 11FIA reserve; • $590,000 from the IUMF regional arterial fund to the 2009 Measure A Western County highway fund for advance construction on the 1-15/Limonite interchange project; • $300,000from 2009 Measure A Western County highway fund to the TUMFregional arterial fund forthe SR79 realignment project; • $250,000 from 2009 Measure A Western County rail fund Proposition 1B funding for rail station rehabilitation and improvement expenditures; and • $2,800,200 from the Debt Service fund to the 2009 Measure A Western County highway and Coachella Valley highway fundsfor BABssubsidy reimbursements. Table 66 - C a p ita I Project Development and Delivery Uses Detail Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change Sala riesand Benefits $ 3,306,500 $ 3,606,400 $ 3,625,000 $ 3,836,900 $ 230,500 6% Professional Costs Legalrvices 6,355,900 5,216,100 5,082,300 3,351,200 (1,864,900) -36% Audit cervices 5,200 33,800 7,300 27,000 (6,800) -20% Ana ncialAdvisory 307,400 696,700 495,000 473,900 (222,800) -32% Professional Se rvices-General 12,312,100 4,313,600 3,657,400 4,871,500 557,900 13% Tota I Professiona I Costs 18,980,600 10,260,200 9,242,000 8,723,600 (1,536,600) -15% 8apport Costs 710,500 951,500 614,000 632,700 (318,800) -34% Projects and Operations Program Operations 5,580,800 10,527,900 9,102,000 5,564,800 (4,963,100) -47% Engineering 3,167,700 8,764,500 7,115,100 33,113,800 24,349,300 278% Construction 35,590,400 67,102,400 39,682,100 111,950,000 44,847,600 67% Design Build 170,452,800 192,599,700 145,452,500 188,565,500 (4,034,200) -2% Rght of Way and Land 27,293,000 87,847,500 36,795,900 91,965,600 4,118,100 5% Local areets and Roads 51,864,000 55,037,500 55,037,500 56,951,500 1,914,000 3% Regional Arterials 14,597,000 30,416,000 20,000,000 30,000,000 (416,000) -1% apecial Studies 2,700 802,000 300,000 50,000 (752,000) -94% Operating and Capital Disbursements 2,314,800 11,175,000 5,650,000 15,750,000 4,575,000 41% Total Projectsand Operations 310,863,200 464,272,500 319,135,100 533,911,200 69,638,700 15% Capital Outlay 5,574,900 5,221,300 3,000,000 3,550,000 (1,671,300) -32% Debt Service 136,530,500 659,804,900 653,859,700 69,555,700 (590,249,200) -89% TransfersOut 175,903,300 266,623,800 255,699,000 126,704,100 (139,919,700) -52% TOTAL Capital Project Development and Delivei $ 651,869,500 $ 1,410,740,600 $ 1,245,174,800 $ 746,914,200 $ (663,826,400) -47% Capital Project Development and Delivery Staffing Summary Po sit io n FY 16/ 17 FY 17/ 18 FY 18/ 19 Administrative Assistant 0.01 0.25 Capital Construction Manager 0.00 0.00 Capital Construction Manager 0.00 0.00 Capital Projects Manager 2.83 3.72 Chief Financial Officer 0.49 0.41 Deputy Directorof Finance 0.07 0.20 Deputy Executive Director 0.12 0.24 Executive Director 0.25 0.24 External Affairs Director 0.06 0.05 FacilitiesAdministrator 0.00 0.06 ITAdministrator 0.00 0.29 Legislative Affairs Manager 0.00 0.00 Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 Planning and Programming Director 0.03 0.11 Planning and Programming Manager 0.01 0.01 Procurement Analyst 0.18 0.39 Procurement Manager 0.71 0.39 Project Delivery Director 0.91 0.75 Public Affairs Manager 0.48 0.35 Right of Way Manager 1.00 0.99 Se niorAdministrative Assistant 0.07 0.06 Senior FnancialAnalyst 0.23 0.10 SeniorManagement Analyst 1.98 2.16 TollOperationsManager 0.85 0.50 Toll Program Director 0.97 0.85 Toll Project Manager 0.96 1.00 Toll SeniorManagement Analyst 0.71 0.25 Toll Technology Manager 0.83 0.30 FTE 14.75 14.67 0.31 1.00 0.80 2.80 0.27 0.06 0.08 0.25 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.05 1.00 0.09 0.02 0.16 0.48 1.00 0.50 0.98 0.04 0.10 2.12 0.70 0.65 1.00 0.30 0.60 15.51 Department Budget Overview Department Description The primary responsibility of Capital Projects is the development and delivery of major highway and rail capital projectswhere the Commission is identified asthe lead agency. The delivery of a capital project can include taskssuch asfeasibility studies, preliminary engineering, environmental clearance, final design, right of way acquisition, utility relocation, construction, construction management, and design -build in addition to the management of varioustypesof agreements. Capital Projects also develops and delivers a limited number of highway and regional arterial projectson behalf of local jurisdictions; these effortsare funded by the local jurisdictionsthrough funding agreements with the Commission. Approximately 62.5%of the Commission's FY 2018/19 budgeted expenditures originates in this department managed by the Toll Program and Project Delivery Directorsresponsible for the capital program. Capital Projectsacceleratesdelivery of the Measure A, toll, state, and federally funded highway, regional arterial, and rail capital improvement projects throughout the County. Highway improvementscurrently in progress include the addition of mixed flow, truck climbing, and tolled expresslanes; widening and realignment projects; interchange improvements; and a new CETAP corridor. Commuter rail capital improvements include the expansion of commuter rail service in Western County and related station improvement and rehabilitation projects. Regional arterial capital improvements include Western County TUMF and Measure A regional arterial projectsadministered bythe Planning and Programming Department and reimbursements to CVAG related to the highway and regional arterial program that it administersin the Coachella Valley. Capital Projects may develop and deliver Western County regional arterial projects on behalf of local jurisdictions, asnoted previously. The 2009 Measure A program includesfunding to the incorporated citiesand the County forlocal streetsand roadsmaintenance, repair, and construction. The budgeted amount isset by formula established in the Measure A TIP. Each jurisdiction's respective allocation is based on population (Western County and Palo Verde Valley) or dwelling units (Coachella Valley) and the amount of salestaxgenerated.The Planning and Programming Department administersthe local streetsand roadsfunding eligibility reviews. Capital Projects providesthe necessary coordination between the Commission and Caltransfor the development of scope, cost, and project delivery schedules for Measure A projects that include STIPfunding. Given the support required to oversee and participate in the project development work, costsfor Commission staff and related support are included in this department budget. The projects identified in the FY2018/19 budget funded by Measure A, TUMF, state, or federal fundsaswell as future toll revenues require the continued support of the Bechtel program management team which includes program managers, project engineers, construction engineers, inspectors, contractsadministration, and support staff. Right of Way Acquisition and &wort Services The Commission authorized the development of a Right of Way Acquisition Program in 2006. The primary goal of the Right of Way Management Division isthe delivery of right of way in the most cost-effective manner and within project schedules, while adhering to federal and state regulations. To implement the Commission's directive, the Commission maintains on -call agreements with right of way consultant services in the fields of right of way engineering and surveying, environmental a,rrssment, appraisal and appraisal review, acquisition and relocation, feasibility studies and cost estimates, property management, and utility relocation. The Right of Way Management Division supervisesand manages right of way servicesand related support for individual projectsthat are included in the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department budget. Property Management The Commission strivesto manage its real property with the objective of maximizing existing and future public transportation benefits, safety, and income by means of professional property management policies and procedures. This includes issuing licenses and rights of entry for authorized third -party uses, as well as investigating and resolving issues regarding uses not authorized by the Commission. During FY 2014/15 the Commission performed a comprehensive analysis of existing licenses and encroachments. The Commission resolved private use and utility encroachments on the SJBL, resulting in additional licenses. The Commission will continue to monitor, identify and, if necessary, enter into new licenses or eliminate encroachments on the SJBL. In certain limited situations, the Commission may also grant easements. The property management scope of work on all Commission -owned propertiesconsistsof general maintenance activities and security measures. The property management function includesthe demolition and clearance of structuresand otherimprovementson acquired property, excluding commuter rail stations. Additionally, the Commission must manage real property acquired for a project until required for construction. Since 1990, the Commission acquired property assets in the course of rail and highway project implementation. To date the rail properties number over 225 parcels. The Commission acquired approximately 500 parcelsfor the SR74 widening project (Segments 1 and 2) and transferred to Caltrans most of these parcels, which were related to Segment 1. In addition, approximately 130 propertieshave been acquired forthe SR-91 HOV lanes, Mid County Parkway, 9R79 realignment, SR74 curve widening, PVL, and 1-215 corridor improvements(central segment). Property acquisition forthe 91 Project began in 2010 with all of the 197 required parcelsacquired and delivered to the design -builder by June 2015; the Commission acquired 98 parcels through escrow and 87 parcels through eminent domain actions. The remaining 12 parcels acquired through condemnation actions are in active litigation. The Commission acquired fee and permanent easement rightsthat will be transferred primarily to Caltrans, the County, and the city of Corona upon completion of the project. Upon project completion, all remaining portionsof propertieswithin every project are rea3cs,Pd and deemed surpluswhen it has been determined that the continued retention of the property no longersupportsthe Commission'spolicygoalsand objectives. In connection with the 2013T1RA Loan for the 91 Project, the Commission is required to establish a $20 million TIFIA debt service reserve by June 30, 2019. The Commission anticipates that proceeds from the sales of excess properties related to the 91 Project of approximately $10 million through June 2019 will be used to fund the reserve in addition to surplus revenues from the RCTC 91 Express Lanes and/or 2009 Measure A Western County highway funds. Long -Term Strategic Planning The Commission completed a significant effort in December 2006 to develop an implementation plan strategy for the 2009 Measure A state highway program, with a focuson the first 10 yearsof the program through 2019. The effort, known as the Western County Highway Delivery Plan, included an objective -based agrrssment of the Western County portion of the 2009 Measure A TIP along with the prioritization of the program of projects. The Commission selected four highway corridors(1-215, 1-15, 1-10, and SR-91) asthe priority focusfor the first 10 yearsof the 2009 Measure A program, and long-term development work wasapproved for large-scale projectssuch asthe development of the Mid County Parkway, realignment of SR79, and the bi-county widening of I- 215 to San Bernardino County. Project development activities for these projects have been ongoing, including an update and reprioritization in January 2010 in response to the economic downturn. Since 2010, the Commission completed a scope reevaluation of the 1-15 Express Lanes project and adopted a new scope of work that consists of tolled express lanes on the northern 15 miles of 1-15 in the County. The Commission deferred the 1-10 truck climbing lanes project several years and replaced it with added safety improvements on SR60. For the strategic projects, the Commission completed preliminary engineering and environmental clearance for the Mid County Parkway, SR79 realignment and the SR60 truck climbing lanes; right of way acquisition for the first construction package of the Mid County Parkway is proceeding and acquisitions for the remainder of Mid County Parkway will be considered forextraordinaryacquisitionson a pay-as-you-go basis. Project costsand anticipated funding for these projectsare updated annually, and a status update has been included in each of the annual Commission workshopssince 2011. The Commission anticipates an update of the capital project implementation strategic plans in 2019 and 2029, as required by the 2009 Measure A. CVAG developed a strategic plan for Coachella Valley highway and regional arterial projects based upon a transportation project prioritization study that isupdated periodically. The PVL project, included in the 1989 and 2009 Measure A programs, is now complete and in operation since June 2016. The Commission develops other rail capital projects in coordination with SCRRA or based on a rail station plan that isupdated periodically. Station operation costsare included in the Rail Department (Section 5.2). Four new Western County transportation corridorswere identified through CETAPand are eligible for 2009 Measure A Western County new corridor and TUMF CETAP funding. Given the size and anticipated cost of these new corridors, they are moving forward on varied schedules with the work on the internal corridors, the Mid County Parkway and 1-215 corridor improvement project (south segment completed in 2013 and central segment completed fall 2016), being the most advanced. Additionally, the Commission will participate in the improvement of a wildlife corridor crossing under SR91, B Canyon, in collaboration with Caltrans, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, U.S. National Forest, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Department of Parksand Recreation. These strategic planning activities play a significant part of the Commission's annual budget process, in particularthe capital budget. Key Assum ptions for FY 2018/ 19 • The Commission will continue its emphasis on the closeout of the 1989 Measure A Western County highway and rail programs. • The Western County Highway Delivery Plan will serve asthe basisfordefining the 2009 Measure A project selection and prioritization. • In connection with agreements for the advancement of 2009 Measure A funds with CVAG and cities participating in the Commission's debt programs, the Commission will deduct annual principal and interest payments for these loans from each agency's respective disbur%mentsbased on the termsof the loan agreements. • The Commission will develop highway project costsbased on engineers estimatesand scope agreementswith Caltrans. • The Commission will competitively bid construction projectsto minimize costsand comply with public contracting law. " The Commission will competitively procure using a best value selection process for design - build projectsto maximize value to the Commission. " All projectswill be built to required federal and state standards. " Upon project completion, the Commission will transferall highway projects, with the exception of tolled expresslane facilities, to Caltrans; operation and maintenance of these facilitiesisthe responsibility of Caltrans. The Commission will operate and maintain tolled express lane facilities, when completed, for the term agreed to by Caltrans and the Commission. Toll operationscostsare included in Section 5.4ofthisdocument. " The Commission will develop strategiesto implement alternative financing structuresincluding public toll facilities. " Construction of the Mid County Parkway will proceed based on construction packages carefully scoped to provide maximum immediate public benefit while also matching funding availability. " The Planning and Programming Department administers the Western County TUMFregional arterial projectsapproved by the Commission in 2004; however, Capital Projectswill continue project development of the I-15/Railroad Canyon Road interchange project on behalf of the city of Lake Elsinore. Accomplishments in FY 2017/ 18 " Continued implementation of the Western County Highway Delivery Plan. " Completed work on right of way acquisition, railroad agreement work, and design for the Pachappa underpassproject. " Completed 91 Project construction work, design -build contract closeout, the fourth Financial Plan annual update, and reaffirmed the Commission'stoll revenue bond ratings. " Continued right of way acquisition and performed utility relocationsfor the 71/91 connector project; submitted an application to the SB 1 Solutions for Congested Corridors competitive grant program for project construction funding. " Continued to advance the development of the 1-15 ExpressLanesproject in numerousareas: " Sgnificantly advanced final design of the civil and toll improvements and started construction. " Completed the project financing including obtaining the 2017 TIFIA Loan. " Commenced final design of the toll Regional Operations Center. " Obtained Board approval of an overall contracting strategy for the 15/91 Express Lanes connector project,amended professional servicescontracts, and started environmental study and preliminary engineering work. " Obtained Board approval to seek and apply STIP funding for the Project Approval/Environmental Document phase of the 1-15 Express Lanes  Southern Extension project from Cajalco Road to SR74. " Procured and awarded a professional services contract and started work on the Next Generation Toll Feasibility Study to help determine the Commission'sfuture toll projects. " Acquired most of the property required for environmental mitigation for the Mid County Parkway project, and commenced required cultural and biological resource mitigation forthe project. " Continued final design for the I-215/Placentia interchange project, the first construction package of Mid County Parkway. " Continued post environmental impact report/environmental impact statement closeout tasks including cultural and biological resource mitigation forthe SR79 realignment project. " Completed construction forthe PVL project that began service in June 2016. " Completed design and commenced construction of the Riverside  La Sierra station parking lot expansion project. " Commenced construction of the Riverside Downtown station pedestrian improvements project. " Completed design, right of way, and construction of the PVLstation pedestrian shelters. " Completed environmental approval and commenced construction management of the Riverside Layover Facility. " Completed procurement of on -call design and environmental services and construction management and construction support servicesfor rail projects. " Received environmental approval and continued design and right of way acquisition for the SR60truck climbing lanesproject. " Completed construction of the 1-215 central widening project. " Completed preliminary engineering and environmental clearance and commenced final design and right-of-way phasesfor the I-15/Railroad Canyon interchange project for the city of Lake Elsinore. " Continued preliminary engineering and environmental clearance workforthe Santa Ana River Trail project for the District. " Commenced preliminary engineering and environmental clearance work for the Santa Ana River Trail -Green River Golf Course Trail Project for the District. " Supported public outreach activities by providing graphics from the right of way project management database for Commission presentations to facilitate public understanding of project issues. " Continued to declare property no longer needed for transportation purposes as surplus and sold several surplusproperties. Major Initiatives in FY 2018/ 19 FY2018/19 will mark the tenth year ofthe 2009 Measure A program asthe Commission closesout the 1989 Measure A programs and continues project activities related to the 2009 Measure A programs, of which the highway, rail, regional arterial, and local streets and roads programs represent the majority of the funding allocations. All of the 1989 Measure A highway projectshave been completed, except for the Pachappa underpass project, which isa portion removed from the SR91 HOV lanes project and will be constructed beginning in FY2018/19. Various stages of project development work forprojectsincluded in the Western County Highway Delivery Plan such asthe 1-15 Express Lanes Project will continue in FY2018/19. Detailed descriptions of the capital projects, including local streets and roads funding, that are included in the FY2018/19 budget follow the Performance/Workload Indicators. Department Goals Build upon and strengthen the partnership with Caltrans toward timely delivery of identified Measure A, toll program, and S11P projects. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Connecting the Economy) Objectives: " Develop agreementswith Caltransand FHWA, asmay be required, to finalize project scoping and cost issuesforthe STIP, toll, and Measure A funded highway projectsin the County. " Meet the project milestonesidentified in agreementsbetween Commission, Caltrans, and the CTC. To the extent permitted by law, pursue reasonable involvement of local DBE and SBEfirms in contract work. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objective: " Maintain and monitor goal fora minimum DBEparticipation in all federally funded contracts. Provide effective communication of project progress to the Board, city councils, the County Board of Supervisors, Ca!trans, CTC, FTA and FHWA. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objective: • Develop a strategy with Caltrans District 8 that would allow the Commission to advance specific projectsidentified in the Western County Highway Delivery Plan to take advantage of any unexpected state or federal funding which may become available through increased state orfederal budget authorizations, federal stimulus, orpotential loan programsto advance construction. Work with Caltrans and other agencies toward completion of preliminary engineering and environmental clearance of all projects. (Policy Goal: Quality of Life) Objective: • Work with Caltrans, the County, and the cities in the County to complete preliminary design and environmental clearance for Measure A projects that could be eligible to receive additional or early funding from various sources that could become available if a project is sufficiently developed. Construct the highway projects identified in the budget. (Policy Goals Quality of Life, Operational Excellence, Connecting the Economy) Objective: • Achieve closeout of completed highway construction projects. In coordination with the Rail Program Manager, construct capital improvements at existing commuter rail stations as identified in the budget. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Operational Excellence, Responsible Partner) Objectives: • Complete closeout activities related to the PVL. • Commence or continue construction of rail station capital improvements and rehabilitation projects. • Complete closeout activities related to the 91 Project. Acquire right of way for rail and highway projects identified in the budget. (Policy Goals Quality of Life, Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Acquire right of way for the following projects: Mid County Parkway, 71/91 connector project, Pachappa underpass, I-15/Railroad Canyon interchange, I-215/Placentia interchange, and SR60 truck climbing lanes. • Protect and maintain propertiesacquired for future projects. • Dispose of Commission -approved excess land in a timely manner and in accordance with applicable regulations. Identify alternative financing strategies to fully fund projects identified in the Western County Highway Delivery Plan. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Commence a "next generation" toll feasibility study to identify potential toll projects. " Continue the assessment and evaluation of available financing strategies, including federal credit assistance. Chart 50 Location ofFY2018/19 Major Capital Projects within Riverside County [GEOGRAPHICSTO INSERTMAP HERE] 1) 9R79 Continue preliminary engineering work for realignment between Gilman Springs Road and Domenigoni Parkway. 2) SR-91 (A) Begin construction of the Pachappa underpass. (B) Complete closeout activitiesforthe 91 Project. (C) Continue design and right of way activities of the 71/91 connector project. (D) Begin design -build and construction of the 91 Corridor Operationsproject. 3) Mid County Parkway (A) Continue design and right of way, and begin construction related to the I-215/Placentia interchange. (B) Continue environmental permitting work and acquisition of property for environmental mitigation related to entire length of project. 4) 1-15 (A) Continue design -build and toll services activities for the tolled expresslanesfrom SR60to Cajalco Road in Corona. (B) Continue design -build and toll servicesdevelopment for the addition of the 15/91 Express Lanesconnector. (C) Begin environmental studies and preliminary engineering for the 1-15 Express Lanes Southern Extension project. 5)SR60Truck Climbing Lanes Complete right of way acquisition and design and begin construction. 6) Local Streetsand Roads Allocate Measure A revenuesto each city and the County to improve, maintain, and repair high priority local streets and roads. 7) I-15/Railroad Canyon Interchange Continue design and right of way acquisition for modification of interchange. 8) Santa Ana River Trail Complete environmental and design phases and begin construction of a multi -use trail. Capital Project Development & Delivery Performance/Workload Indicators FY16/17 Estimated FY16/17 Actual FY17/18 Estimated FY18/19 Projected Preliminary engineering (project reports and environmental documentation) contractsawarded 1 0 2 4 Plans, specifications, and estimate contractsawarded 3 2 5 3 Numberof projectswith active right of way acquisition 4 5 7 8 Construction, design -build, and toll system awards 2 0 3 2 License agreementsmanaged 570 563 550 550 Appraisal and appraisal reviews completed 125 92 85 75 Capital ProjectsSummary The following is summary of the capital projects included in the FY2018/19 budget with costs generally categorized by preliminary engineering, final design, right of way, construction, and design -build phasesin addition to otherproject-related costssuch assalariesand benefits, Bechtel project management, and legal fees. Westem County Highway and Regional Arterial Projects SR-60 Truck Climbing La nes (PO03029) Provide funding and support to begin construction for eastbound climbing and westbound descending truck climbing lanesfrom Gilman SpringsRoad to west of Jack Rabbit Trail; upgrade existing shouldersto standard widths. Construction of the project isexpected to be completed by 2021. The total project cost isestimated at $138 million. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 615,000 Preliminary engineering $ 25,200,000 Construction/construction support $ 385,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 661,200 Other project -related costs Costs funded with CMAQ, STIP/RIP, State Highway Operation and Protection Program, and 2009 Measure A highway funds. Caltrans is the lead agency for preliminary engineering and design. The Commission is the lead agency for right of way acquisition and construction. N/A; state highway operationsare the responsibility ofCaltrans. SR 79 Realignment (PO03003) Complete post -environmental phase work and permitting for realignment from Gilman Springs Road to Domenigoni Parkway. The total estimated project cost is $1.2 billion. Initiation of subsequent phaseswill be dependent upon the availability of funding. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 300,000 Preliminary engineering $ 94,500 Other project -related costs Costs funded using TUMF regional arterial, 2009 Measure A highway, and federal funds. N/A; state highway operationsare the responsibility ofCaltrans. 91 Project (P003028) Closeout design -build and toll system implementation activitiesforthe tolled expressand mixed flow lanes project from the Orange County line to Pierce Street, including tolled express lanes connectivity to 1-15 and improvementsto the 15/91 interchange. Project development activities began in September2007 and Ianeswere open to traffic in March 2017. The 91 Project cost is estimated at $1.4 billion, including financing costs. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 2,000,000 Construction/support services $ 24,000,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 1,132,900 Design -build $ 1,625,200 Other project -related costs Costsfunded using 2009 Measure A highway and new corridor funds including sales tax revenue bonds and commercial paper, toll revenue bonds, a federal T1FiA loan, STIP and State Local Partnership Program funds, and 1989 Measure A contribution. Operation and maintenance of the tolled express lanes facilitiesare the responsibility of the Commission, while all other state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Current estimatesof annual operating and maintenance costs are $14.5 million. Such costsare paid from the collection of toll revenues beginning in March 2017. Toll operating costs are included in Toll Operations, asdiscussc‘d in Section 5.4. 71/91 Connector Project(P003021) Continue right of way acquisition and utility relocation work and begin environmental revalidation work for improvementsto the 71/91 connector in anticipation of funding from the SB 1 programs. Final design began in March 2012. The total estimated project cost is$118 million. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 3,950,000 Fina 1 d esig n $ 5,100,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 395,900 Other project -related costs Costs for right of way acquisition and utility relocation work primarily funded using Congressionally -designated federal funding remaining from previous area projects. Other costs funded with 2009 Measure A highway funds. N/A; state highway operationsare the responsibility of Caltrans. SR-91 HOV La nes/Ada ms Street to 60/91/ 215 Interchange (P003005) Complete project closeout. Preliminary engineering began in 2001. Construction of the project was completed in fall 2016. The estimated total project cost is$273 million. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 635,000 Right of way acquisition/support services, including utility relocation $ 30,700 Other project -related costs Remaining right of way costs funded with CMAQ and 1989 Measure A highway funds. Caltransisthe lead agency. N/A; state highway operationsare the responsibility of Caltrans. 91 Corridor Operations Project (P623046) Complete environmental approvals, final design, and construction of several operational improvements along the SR-91 including 1-15 northbound 91 Express Lanes ingress and SR-91 westbound general purpose lanes improvements at the County line. Project development activitiesbegan in May 2018. The 91 CorridorOperationsProject costsisestimated at $6,000,000, including contingency. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 1,000,000 Construction $ 4,500,000 Design -build $ 500,000 Other project -related costs Costsfor environmental, final design, and construction work will be funded using surplus toll revenues. the Commission's authorizing legislation, SB1316, requiresthat all surplus revenue be spent for transportation purposeswithin the SR-91 corridor. Operation and maintenance of the tolled express lanes facilities are the responsibility of the Commission (Section 5.4), while all otherstate highway operationsare the responsibility of Caltrans. 1-15 Express Lanes Project (P003027) Continue design -build and toll system design and construction to add two tolled express lanes in each direction from SR60 to Cajalco Road in Corona. the project is using the design -build method of project delivery. Project development activities began in April 2008, and lanes are expected to be open to traffic in 2020. The estimated total project cost is$472 million, including financing costs. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 150,000 $ 9,350,000 $ 1,402,500 $ 134,950,000 $ 4,012,300 Preliminary engineering Construction Right of way support services Design -build Other project -related costs Project development costs funded using 2009 Measure A highway funds. Federal CMAQ and STBG funds to fund interagency support and a portion of design -build costs. A federalTlRA loan secured by the Commission willfund a portion of design -build and toll system costs. Proceeds from sales tax revenuesdebt completed the project financing. Operation and maintenance of future tolled express lanes facilitiesare the responsibility of the Commission, while all other federal and state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Preliminary estimates of annual operating and maintenance costsare $14 million. Such costswill be paid from the collection of toll revenues. 15/91 &press Lanes Connector(P003039) Continue design -build and construction to add an expresslanesconnector between SR91 and 1-15 to the north. The project is using the design -build method of project delivery through amend mentsto existing contractsrelated to the 91 Project (P003028) and the 1-15 Express Lanes Project (P003027), as permitted by AB 115 signed by the Govemor in June 2017. Project development activities began in May 2017, and lanes are expected to be open to traffic by 2023 or earlier. The estimated total project cost is$180 million. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 5,772,000 Construction $ 47,982,600 Design -build $ 2,055,200 Other project -related costs All project development costsfunded by State SB 132. Operation and maintenance of future tolled express lanes facilitiesare the responsibility of the Commission. Such costswill be paid from the collection of toll revenues. 1-15 Express Lanes—Southem Extension (P003044) Commence preliminary engineering and environmental studiesto add express lanesbetween SR74 and Cajalco Road. The project seeks to extend express lanes south of the 1-15 Express Lanes Project (P003027) currently under construction. Project development activities began in September 2017 when the Board approved STIP funds for the next phase of project development. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 4,000,000 Preliminary engineering $ 1,061,300 Other project -related costs All project development costsfunded by State SB 1 ST1Pfunds. Operation and maintenance of future tolled express lanes facilitiesare the responsibility of the Commission, while all other federal and state highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Commission costs will be paid from the collection of toll revenues. 1-15 Railroad Canyon Interchange (005104) Begin final design and right-of-way acquisition of Phase 1 for the city of Lake Osinore. The estimated total project cost is$35 million. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 2,400,000 Fina I d esig n $ 4,000,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 585,200 Other project -related costs None; costsfunded using TUMF, S31 Local Partnership Program, a n d STl P. N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. 1-215 Corridor Improvements/Scott Road to Nuevo Road (Central Segment) (P003023) Complete three-year plant establishment period (October 2018) and project closeout (June 2019). Project added one mixed flow lane in each direction. Preliminary engineering began in 2007 and wascompleted in 2011. Final design began in 2011 and wascompleted in December 2012; construction began in 2013and wascompleted in 2016.lhe total project cost isestimated at $120 million. FY2018/19Cost $ 925,000 Construction/construction management/support services $ 5,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 66,600 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Costs funded using CMIA, S11P-RIP, and 2009 Measure A highway funds. Operating Budget Impact N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Mid County Parkway (P002302, P612317 & P612320) Commence construction of I-215/Placentia interchange, the first construction package, and perform activities related to post-environmental/permitting, design and right of way fora new corridor from 1-215to SR79. Construction ofthisnew facility will be completed over many years asfunding becomesavailable and isestimated to cost $1.7 to $1.9 billion. FY2018/19 Cost $ 5,400,000 Preliminary engineering/final design $ 7,300,000 Construction/construction management/support services $ 21,725,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 959,300 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Costsfunded with IUMFCETAPfundsand 2009 Measure A new corridorfunds. Operating Budget Impact N/A; responsibility for highway operations has not been determined. Pachappa Underpass(P003038) Perform activities related to design, right of way, and construction phases. Design will be performed by Caltrans. Project will remove the Pachappa shoofly activities and construct the retaining wall, drainage, and track work for the permanent Pachappa underpass. the total project cost isestimated at $18 million with an anticipated completion date in 2020. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 388,000 Environmental engineering/surveying/material testing $ 12,460,000 Construction/construction management/support services $ 625,000 Right of way acquisition/supportservices $ 980,400 Other project -related costs Costs funded with federal earmarks, CMAQ, and SB 1 Local Partnership funds. N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans and railroad operations are the responsibility of Union Pacific Railroad. Various Westem County State SB132 Projects(P003042, P003043, P003132, P003040 & P003041) Provide funding and support for the engineering, construction, and right of way activities related to various Western County highway and grade separation projects. FY2018/19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 12,050,000 Preliminary engineering $ 30,000,000 Construction $ 20,000,000 Right of way acquisition/support costs $ 558,600 Other project -related costs Costsfunded using State SB 132 funds. N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Caltrans. Sa nta Ana Fiver Trail (P007201 & P007202) Provide support to the District forthe Santa Ana RverTrail project undera cooperative planning and development agreement. The District isthe lead agency forenvironmental compliance for NEPA and CEQA, and the Commission is responsible for project oversight and approval, final design, and construction. The District isresponsible for 100%of costs. FY2018/19 Cost $ 970,000 Preliminary engineering $ 10,208,000 Construction/construction support services $ 255,000 Right of way acquisition/support costs $ 913,600 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact None; costswill be funded by the District. Operating Budget Impact N/A; operationsare the responsibility of the District. Va rious Weste m County Highway Projects(P003001, P003009, P003017, P005133, P005134, P623999, P629199, P613999, P615133, P622402, P735119, & 735120) Provide funding and support for the engineering, construction, and right of way activities related to various Western County highway and grade separation projects. FY2018/19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 724,500 Engineering/final design $ 1,950,000 Construction $ 788,100 Fight of way acquisition/support costs $ 74,136,500 Other project -related costs Costsfunded using primarily 2009 Measure A highway funds. N/A; federal highway operations are the responsibility of Ca Itra ns. Various Western County Measure A and 1UMF Regional Arterial Projects (P005203, P005102, P005107, P005116, P005127, P725000, P665102 & P005200) Provide Western County Measure A and IUMFfunding and support through the Planning and Programming Department for the engineering, right of way, and construction activitiesrelated to various Western County Measure A and IUMF regional arterial projects approved by the Commission. Total project costs approved for MARA and IUMF regional arterial projects approximate $143 million. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 364,300 Engineering and final design $ 7,358,000 Construction $ 10,020,000 Right of way acquisition $ 1,544,700 Other project -related costs Costsfunded using IUMFregional arterial and 2009 Measure A regional arterial funds with various local jurisdictions as lead agency fortheir respective projects. N/A; regional arterial operations are the responsibility of the local jurisdictions. MSHCP Land Acquisition in Westem County (P002800) Provide funding and support for the acquisition of land as mitigation for the cumulative and indirect impacts associated with construction of future highway projects as required by 2009 Measure A. lhe annual commitment through December2019 is$3 million. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact Rail Projects $ 3,000,000 Land acquisition Costsfunded using 2009 Measure A highway funds. N/A; land mitigation operationsare the responsibility of RCA. Perris Valley Line and Other Rail Projects(P003800, P003823& P003834) Complete closeout of extension of commuter rail services to Perris. Project commenced in December 2007 when the Commission received approval from FTA to move into project development. Other rail projects include adding a fourth main track between the Riverside Downtown station to the connector to the SJBL branch line at Highgrove. Project was substantially completed in September 2016 for a total project cost of $248.3 million, excluding other rail project costs. Revenue service commenced in June 2016. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 210,000 Construction/construction management/support services $ 10,000 Right of way acquisition/support services $ 194,600 Other project -related costs Costs will be funded using FTA, CMAQ, SIP, STIP, and 1989 Measure A Western County and 2009 Measure A Western County rail funds as well as proceeds from sales of surplus properties. Rail station operations related to this project, which will be the responsibility of the Commission upon completion of the project, will be funded with OF and property management fees. Rail service and capital operationswill be the responsibility of Metrolink and will be funded by the Commission with LlFand STA based on an allocation determined by Metrolink. Annual operating costs for nine stations and the RDOCC approximate $6.2 million and are included in Rail Operationsasdiscu—rdin Section 5.2. Station operations costs will be funded by the Commission with 2009 Measure A Western County rail funds. Perris Valley Line Platform Ca nopies(P004025) Install seven major canopies and four small canopies at the Riverside — Hunter Park, Moreno Valley —March Feld, and Perris —South rail stations. The project isexpected to commence spring 2018 and be completed in fall 2018. Total project costsis$2.9 million. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 22,000 Material testing $ 1,525,000 Construction/construction support services $ 15,000 Right of way acquisition/support costs $ 492,400 Other project -related costs Costsfunded using FTA Section 5307grant and 2009 Measure A County rail funds. Operationswill be the responsibility of the Commission and are funded using 2009 Measure A Westem County rail funds. Iverside-La Sierra Station Improvements(P653826) Improve the multimodal benefits of the station to serve the express bus network following completion of the 91 Project and provide a dedicated park and ride facility for carpools and vanpoolsalong SR91. Facility improvementsinclude the addition of 500 parking spaces, six new bus bays, a new signalized street entrance, and dedicated bus stops and passcngerloading area. Construction started spring 2018 and is anticipated to be completed in summer 2018. Construction isestimated at $3 million. FY2018/19 Cost $ 1,790,000 Construction/construction management $ 5,000 Right of way support costs $ 205,000 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Costs funded with FTA Section 5309 and Section 5307 grant funds, property sale proceeds, and 2009 Measure A County rail funds. Operating Budget Impact Operationswill be the responsibility of the Commission and are funded using 2009 Measure A Westem County rail funds. Riverside Layover Facility (P653822) Increase capacity and maintenance service improvementsto Metrolink'sWest Layover Facility north of the Riverside Downtown station. Improvements include expansion of the facility to accommodate three storage trackswith an overall storage capacity of three 6-train sets. lhe total estimated project cost is$6.3 million. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 350,000 Preliminary engineering $ 5,110,000 Construction/construction management $ 100,000 Right of way support costs $ 707,600 Other project -related costs Costsfunded using FTA Section 5307 grant funds. Operationswill be the responsibility of RRA. Moreno Valley —March Feld Station Upgrade (P004026) Perform activities related to engineering and construction to add an additional platform and pedestrian overpass, and rehabilitate and replace an existing second track and add a new signal system. Engineering and construction are expected to be completed by 2022. the total project cost is estimated at $40 million. FY2018/19 Cost $ 1,100,000 Engineering Measure A Budget Impact Costsfunded using FTA Section 5307 grant funds. Operating Budget Impact Operationswill be the responsibility of the Commission and are funded using 2009 Measure A Westem County rail funds. Flverside Station Track & Platform (P004027) Expand operational flexibility through the construction of an additional center platform and associated tracks on the south side of the station, and extend the existing pedestrian bridge and add an additional elevator for the new platform. Engineering, construction, and right of way are expected to be completed by 2024. the total project cost isestimated at $24 million. FY2018/19 Cost $ 1,300,000 Engineering Measure A Budget Impact Costsfunded using FTA Section 5307 grant funds. Operating Budget Impact Operationswill be the responsibility of the Commission and are funded using 2009 Measure A Westem County rail funds. Station Rehabilitation and Security (P004011, P004012 & P004017) Provide funding and support for station rehabilitation and security at the Riverside Downtown, Riverside — La Sierra, Corona —North Main, West Corona, and Jurupa Valley — Pedley stations. Improvements include lighting, parking lot repaving and restriping, security camera replacements, and deck coating. Construction began in FY 2017/18 with completion anticipated in FY2019/20. FY2018/19 Cost $ 3,250,000 Property improvements(capitaI outlay) $ 15,266,300 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Costsfunded using FTA, Proposition 1B security funds, and 2009 Measure A Western County rail funds. Operating Budget Impact Operationswill be the responsibility of the Commission and are funded using 2009 Measure A Westem County rail funds. VariousWestem County Rail Projects(P654199, P336000, P652402) Provide Measure A funding and support for right of way activitiesrelated to variousrail projects. FY2018/19 Cost $ 150,000 Right of way support services $ 3,718,700 Other project -related costs Measure A Budget Impact Costsfunded using 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Rail funds. Operating Budget Impact N/A; these rail projects may be improvements beyond the rail station boundaries that benefit local jurisdictions who are responsible for operations in those areas. Local Streets and Roads Westem County Area Distribute local return funding for local streets and roads projects in Western County. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 601,000 Banning 945,000 Beaumont 171,000 Calimesa 190,000 Canyon Lake 4,251,000 Corona 1,351,000 Ea stva le 1,813,000 Hemet 2,067,000 Ju ru p a Valley 1,389,000 Lake Elsinore 1,776,000 M e n ife e 4,130,000 Moreno Valley 2,494,000 Murrieta 697,000 N o rc o 1,673,000 Perris 7,863,000 Riverside 902,000 San Jacinto 3,267,000 Temecula 658,000 Wild o m a r 5,668,000 Riverside County 41,906,000 Total Western County (81,700) Less: Allocation of administrative costs $ 41,824,300 Total Western County, net All costs distributed in accordance with 2009 Measure A local streetsand roadsfunds. N/A; local streetsand roadsoperationsare the responsibility of the local jurisdiction. Coachella Valley Distribute local return funding for local streetsand roadsprojectsin Coachella Valley. FY 2018/ 19 Cost Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact $ 1,529,000 Cathedral City 624,000 Coachella 490,000 Desert Hot Springs 273,000 Indian Wells 2,008,000 Indio 1,565,000 La Quinta 2,871,000 Palm Desert 2,174,000 Palm Springs 948,000 Rancho Mirage 1,815,000 Riverside County 14,297,000 Total Coachella Valley (81,700) Less: Allocation of administrative costs $ 14,215,300 Total Coachella Valley, net All costs distributed in accordance with 2009 Measure A local streetsand roadsfunds. N/A; local streetsand roadsoperationsare the responsibility of the local jurisdiction. Palo Verde Valley Area Distribute local return funding for local streetsand roads projects in Palo Verde Valley. FY 2018/ 19 Cost $ 799,000 Blythe 194,000 Riverside County Measure A Budget Impact Operating Budget Impact 993,000 Total Palo Verde Valley (81,100) Less: Allocation of administrative costs $ 911,900 Total Palo Verde Valley, net All costs distributed in accordance with 2009 Measure A local streetsand roadsfunds. N/A; local streetsand roadsoperationsare the responsibility of the local jurisdiction. Toll Operations Mission Statement: Toll Operations efficiently operates express lanes with high customer satisfaction to reduce congestion, improve mobility, and manage demand. Chart 51 —Toll Operations TransfersOut 13% Debt Service 53% Expenditures Salariesand Benefit sProfe ssio na I 3% Costs 4% aapportand Maintenance Costs 9% Pro g ra m Operations 17% CapitalOutlay 3% Toll operationsexpensesof $50,793,900 represent the second full year of operating expensesand debt service for the RCTC 91 Express Lanes (Table 67). The 1-15 Express Lanes capital project expenditures are included in the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department. Approximately 26%of the expenses and other uses are comprised of operations, maintenance, and support costs. Salaries and benefits reflect a decrease of 19% due to net changes to RE allocations, an increase to the Commission'scontribution to employee health benefits, and merit - based salary increases. Professional costs of $2,061,000, or4%of expenses and other uses, consist of traffic and revenue consultantsand financial advisors, general and specialized legal counsel, audit and financial services, and rating agency and TIRA loan servicing fees. Support and maintenance costsof $4,576,700 include road and systemsmaintenance, insurance, credit card processing fees, violations enforcement, transponder costs, marketing, lease, travel, and other support costs. Program operationscostsof $8,786,100, or 17%of expensesand other uses, primarily includes the toll contractor cost to operate the Express Lanes, system changes to comply with statewide technology requirements, and FP services. Debt service includes $7,119,900 interest payment for the 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds and $20,000,000 of toll -operation surplus revenues for deposit to the 201311FIA Loan reserve fund as required under the TIF1A loan agreement. Transfers out comprise $6,000,000 of toll operations surplus revenues to fund the 91 Corridor Operations project and $307,200 for the administrative cost allocation. Table 67-Toll Operations Uses Detail FY16/17 FY17/18 FY17/18 FY18/19 Dollar Percent Actual Revised Budget Projected Budget Change Change alariesand Benefits $ 148,700 $ 745,100 $ 644,600 $ 603,000 $ Professional Costs Legal cervices 26,100 310,000 150,000 300,000 (10,000) -3% Audit Services 47,500 47,000 47,000 (500) -1% Fnancial Advisory 75,000 75,000 75,000 - 0% Professionalservices- General 73,400 1,003,600 928,200 1,639,000 635,400 63% Total Professional Costs 99,500 1,436,100 1,200,200 2,061,000 624,900 44% aipport and Maintenance Costs 897,600 4,228,500 3,374,300 4,576,700 348,200 8% Projectsand Operations Program Operations 1,893,900 7,984,500 6,711,200 8,786,100 801,600 10% Capital Outlay 650,000 921,000 1,340,000 690,000 106% Debt Service 2,021,200 7,119,900 7,119,900 27,119,900 20,000,000 281% Transfers Out 1,392,200 4,052,900 709,900 6,307,200 2,254,300 56% 10TALTollOperations $ 6,453,100 $ 26,217,000 $ 20,681,100 $ 50,793,900 $ 24,576,900 94% (142,100) -19%I Toll Operations Staffing Summary Position FY 16/17 FY17/18 FY 18/19 Accounting Assistant 0.00 0.05 Chief Financial Officer 0.00 0.10 Deputy Director of Finance 0.00 0.15 Deputy Executive Director 0.02 0.05 Executive Director 0.01 0.10 External Affairs Director 0.00 0.00 IT Administrator 0.00 0.05 Procurement Analyst 0.00 0.05 Procurement Manager 0.00 0.10 Senior Financial Analyst 0.12 0.70 Senior Management Analyst 0.27 0.10 Toll Operations Manager 0.15 0.50 Toll Program Director 0.03 0.15 Toll Project Manager 0.04 0.00 Toll Senior Management Analyst 0.29 0.75 Toll Technology Manager 0.17 0.70 FTE 1.10 3.55 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.10 0.00 0.15 0.30 0.00 0.30 0.35 0.00 0.70 0.40 2.45 Department Budget Overview Department Description Alternative Funding Si`udies In December 2006, the Commission adopted the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan that serves as a 10-year capital improvement plan from 2009-2019 for Western County freeways and highways. To address unprecedented population, economic, and travel demand growth in Western County, the Commission desired to provide freeway corridorimprovementsbeyond what traditional funding sourceswould be able to provide. The Commission studied alternative funding sources, including tolling, in advance of the adoption of the Western Riverside County Delivery Plan asa meansto provide more transportation improvements. In 2006, the Commission conducted a toll feasibility study that determined thatSR91 and 1-15were both feasible corridors to introduce tolling via high occupancy toll lanes (now referred to as express lanes). The Western Riverside County Delivery Plan detailed ambitious improvements to the SR-91 and 1-15 corridors including the addition of two tolled express lanes in each direction and the ability to operate and maintain these tolled express lanes for a long-term period. The Commission'scommitment in 2006 to toll also indicated itsfuture intent to become an operating toll agency and establish the Toll Operations Department. In FY2017/18, the Commission initiated a second toll feasibility study (Next Generation Toll Feasibility Study) to assist in the determination of the location and type of future toll projects. Ibis study is more fully described in the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department section. First Express Lanes Project In FY2017/18, the Commission entered itsfirst full year of operation of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. The completed 91 Project connects the OCTA 91 Express Lanes with the RCTC 91 Express Lanes using a two-mile long mixing area, which allows vehicles to use either or both sections of the 91 Express Lanes (Chart 52). The RCTC 91 Express Lanes continue approximately eight milesto the 1- 15 interchange in Riverside County. A two-lane (one lane in each direction) direct tolled connector approximately 2.8 miles in distance provides the RCTC 91 Express Lanes with accessiegressto 1-15south ofSR91/1-15interchange. The Commission hasthe authority to charge tolls on the RCTC 91 Express Lanes for50 years following the March 2017 opening of the express lanes, based on a toll facility agreement between the Commission and Caltrans. Chart 52 —RCTC 91 Express Lanes ha a r Coun ry line for des ono [ ions rn Riverside County. • Green River Rd • Maple loW nth Sr • SR-71 • Lincoln St • Serfas Club Or • Main St Exit atCounty Lin Pfor destinations in Orange County: • Gypsum Canyon Rd • 24! Toll Rood • Weir Carryon RdlYorbaLinda RPM • koperiai Nvry • Lakeview Ave a9"°�'� dye �M Onta No Aye Legend Existing 91 Express Lanes 91 Express Lanes Extension County Line Entry/Exit Zone Q Carpool, Verification Point 91 Express Lanes EnirylExit Points and Price Signs {Posted price is for the entire trip) OCTA owns and operates the Orange County portion of the 91 Express Lanes. Under a cooperative agreement entered into in December 2011, the Commission and OCTA agreed on use of the same operator for the operation of the 91 Express Lanes. The joint operation of the 91 Express Lanesprovidesfor cost sharing and a seamlesscustomer experience. Commission staff, as supported by the operator, operates and maintains the RCM 91 Express Lanes from the existing Toll Operations Center and administrative offices in Anaheim and Customer Service Center in Corona. The operator's responsibilitiesfor the RCTC 91 Express Lanes include processing of toll transactions, collection of revenue, opening and management of customer accounts, violation processing, traffic operations center management, customer service, financial management, reporting, maintenance of the Revenue and Account Management System and toll lane system, and maintenance of the Anaheim and Corona facilities. Toll Operations provides direct oversight to the operator and administers contracts with the California Highway Patrol performing toll enforcement, Caltrans performing road maintenance, and various maintenance contracts that fall outside of the operator's scope of work. Staff coordinatesongoing joint 91 ExpressLanesmarketing effortswith OCTA; the Commission utilizesa marketing servicesconsultant and CTOC for planning and implementing marketing effortsrelated to the RCTC 91 Express Lanes and future 1-15 Express Lanes. Toll Operations prepares and/or distributesall required reportsand providessupport for the annual financial audit of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. While the Commission and OCTA jointly operate and maintain the 91 Express Lanes, tollsfor each of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes and the OCTA 91 Express Lanes are charged independently and reported separately. In connection with an agreement between the Commission, OCTA, and a master custodian, tollsrelated to the ROTC 91 ExpressLanesand the Commission'sportion of non - toll revenues are deposited with the Commission's trustee into the trust estate for the 2013 Toll Bonds and 2013 T1RA Loan. The Commission uses these revenues to pay for operation and maintenance expenses and debt service related to the 2013 Toll Bonds and 2013 11RA Loan as well asfund repair and rehabilitation reserves. Future Exp re ss La ne s Proje c ts After securing the financing in July 2017, the Commission commenced design and pre - construction of the 1-15 Express Lanes project using the design -build delivery method. A component of the project includes acquisition and development of a toll Regional Operations Center located in Corona for the 1-15 Express Lanes back office support and customer service center. The Commission also is developing an express lanes connector to connect the RCM 91 Express Lanes to the 1-15 Express Lanes to the north (Chart 53). Toll Operations supports project development by providing comprehensive input to the tolling concept of operations, contractor procurements, systems design, agency agreements, public outreach, toll Regional Operations Center development, creation of toll policiesand businessrules, and other support. The costsforthe development of the 1-15 ExpressLanesproject, the 15/91 ExpressLanesconnector project, and the toll Regional Operations Center are included in the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department. The Commission's1-15 ExpressLanesare scheduled to open in 2020with the 15/91 Express Lanes connector anticipated to open by 2022, at which time the daily operations and maintenance and related costs will become the responsibility of the Toll Operations Department. Under a toll facility agreement with Caltrans, similar to the RCTC 91 Express Lanes, the Commission will have the authority to charge tollson the 1-15 Express Lanesfor a 50-year period upon commencement of operations. Chart 53 —Future 1-15 Express Lanes LEGEND Express Lanes ❑ Express Lane Ingress E Express Lane Egress 6.- Express Lane IngressfEgress r Tolling Point OS MIMEO OAl116E SO �0 �1.5,' ■imiallftpr7 S ❑. • Jurupa Valley lJnonRe Ave. Eastvale �' �. • • Riverside a� ro 411.4 ACantu -Gallon* Ranch Rd. "cor . • Norco 1..'1 o Hatlun Ydl&y Navy. I b- Coron a', .� Made Ave.c--=' Magnolia Ave. El Conlin Rd. canalco RI. Welrkk Rd. 4 4-1 State and Regional Toll Efforts Toll Operations is also working on several important efforts related to tolling. The Commission is coordinating with SBCTA regarding its development of express lanes on the 1-15 corridor that commence near the vicinity of the Riverside/San Bernardino County line to the north. Staff is actively involved in the CTOC, which addresses many statewide toll issues including toll technology to improve the customer experience across the state, create synergy among toll agencies, improve legislation related to tolling, and comply with State'sTitle 21 transition to new 6c transpondertechnology. Key Assumptions for FY 2018/ 19 • Construction of the 1-15 Express Lanes project will be underway with tolled express lanes to open by 2020. • Tolled express lane facilities, when completed, will be operated and maintained by the Commission forthe term agreed to by Caltransand the Commission. • The Commission will estimate RCTC 91 Express Lanestoll revenues based on consideration of actual performance pending and updated investment grade traffic and revenue studies. • The Commission will estimate RCM 91 Express Lanes toll operation costs based on actual expend ituresfrom the first full year of operationsand anticipated improvements. • The Commission will have a small Toll Operationsstaff and contract fora significant portion of toll operation services. Accomplishments in FY 2017/ 18 • Successfully operated the RCTC 91 Express Lanes in itsfirst full year. • Supported presentations to the rating agencies regarding the successful opening and operation of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. • Developed a plan forthe transition to national 6c transpondertechnology. • Participated in the CTOC efforts to establish a statewide plan for transition to the 6C transponder technology, statewide marketing, toll enforcement legislation, and advancement of toll collection technology related to clean air vehicles. • Performed extensive coordination with the 1-15 ExpressLanesproject toll servicesproviderand design-builderforthe toll system design. • Developed the 15/91 Express Lane Connector concept of operations. • Successfully procured an express lanes marketing servicesconsultant. Major Initiatives in FY 2018/ 19 Toll Operationswill manage the operationsof the RCTC 91 ExpressLanesin a mannerthat adheres to the RCTC 91 Express Lanes Toll Policy adopted in June 2012: • Provide a safe, reliable, and predictable commute for 91 Express Lanescustomers; • Optimize vehicle throughput at free flow speeds; • Pay debt service and maintain debt service coverage; • Increase average vehicle occupancy; • Balance capacity and demand to serve customers who pay tolls as well ascarpoolerswith three or more personswho are offered discounted tolls; • Generate sufficient revenue to sustain the financial viability of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes; • Ensure all covenantsin the financing documentsare met; and • Provide net revenues forRiverside freeway/SR-91 corridor improvements, as allowable under SB 1316. Monitoring and reporting on actual toll transactions and related toll revenues is a primary responsibility for Toll Operations. Actual transactions and revenue are compared to projected revenue utilizing the Riverside County 91 Express Lanes Extension Investment Grade Study prepared byStantec Consulting Se rviceslnc.(Stantec)in May 2012assupplemented byStantec's supplemental letter in June 2013. While the Commission relied on this study for its projection of grossrevenuesgenerated by the RCTC 91 ExpressLanesoverthe 50-yeartollauthorization period, the Commission's actual financing case for the 91 Project assumed more conservative toll revenues. Asa result of the successful opening of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes, the Commission will obtain an updated investment grade study in FY 2018/19. Toll Operations projected the FY 2018/2019 budgeted toll revenue of $31,681,800 based on actual performance to date; accordingly, the Commission expects the FY 2018/19 toll revenues to exceeds the Stantec and financing case estimates. The development of Toll Operations budgeted non -toll revenues (penalties and fees) and expenses also considered the non -toll revenue and operating cost estimates for the RCTC 91 ExpressLanesincluded in Engineer'sTechnical Report prepared by Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. (Parsons) in June 2013. As the project and construction manager for the 91 Project, Parsons analyzed and projected the RCTC 91 Express Lanes non -toll revenues and operation and maintenance expenses. The Commission relied on the Engineer'sTechnical Report to project non - toll revenues and operation and maintenance expenses in order to project cash flow and debt service coverage forthe financing of the 91 Project using the 2013 Toll Bondsand 201311FIA Loan. Toll Operation projected FY 2018/19 non -toll revenues using actual results since opening. In connection with the 6c transition during FY2018/19, RCTC and OCTA are considering changesto 91 Express Lanestransponders and account plansthat may impact non -toll revenues during the second half of FY2018/19; however, such changes are not expected to significantly affect the budgeted non -toll revenues. For the second full year of operations, the Engineer's Technical Report assumed costs of approximately $14.4 million, whereasthe FY2018/19 budget isapproximately $17.4 million, or21% above the amount in the Engineer's Technical Report. The $3 million operations cost increase relates to the statewide transition to 6c technology, higher credit card fees due to higher transactionsthan originally estimated, and relocation costsof the customer service centerto the toll Regional Operations Center. In addition to monitoring toll revenues during FY 2018/19, Toll Operationswill analyze these operation and maintenance costsduring the fiscal year. Toll Operationswill also continue to support the design and development of the 1-15 Express Lanes and 15/91 Express Lanes connector projects, which will consist of facility design with the design- builderand toll system design with the toll systemsprovider. Toll Operationswill also continue efforts in the area of environmental management and public outreach. Toll Operationswill support the development of a "next generation" tollfeasibility study to consider future tolling opportunities. Consultant costs for this feasibility study are included in the Planning and Programming Department, while Commission staff and othercostsare included in the Capital Project Development and Delivery Department. Cash Flows from Toll Operations The Commission pledged toll revenues as security for the toll -supported debt for the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. Information regarding the 2013 Toll Bondsand 2013 T1F1A Loan isincluded in Section 5, Commission Debt. The Commission doesnot anticipate any depositsto the repairand rehabilitation fund nordoesit expect any repairand rehabilitation expenditurespermitted underthe masterindenture and 2013 T1FIA Loan agreement during the second full year of operations. The financial model for the 91 Project also did not assume such funding or expenditures. The projected cash flows for the RCTC 91 Express Lanes for the year ending June 30, 2019 are presented in Table 68. Table 68—RCTC 91 6cpressLanes Projected Cash Flows FY 2018/19 Cash balance at July1, 2018, asprojected $ 33,605,400 Cash flows from operating activities: Sourcesof operating funds: Toll revenue Non -toll revenue Reimbursements Total sourcesof operating funds Uses of fundsforoperations and maintenance: ailariesand benefits Professional costs aipport and maintenance costs Projects and operations Capital outlay Total uses of fundsforoperationsand maintenance Net cash provided by operations Cash flows from non -capital financing activities: 91 Corridor Operationsproject Administrative allocation to General fund Net cash used by non -capital financing activities Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: T1F1A reserve fund Interest paid on 2013Toll Bonds Net cash used by capital and related financing activities Cash flows from investing activities: Interest on investments Net cash provided by investing activities 31, 681, 800 5,258,700 8,500,000 45,440,500 603,000 2,061,000 4,576,700 8,786,100 1,340,000 17, 366, 800 28, 073, 700 (6,000,000) (307,200) (6,307,200) (20,000,000) (7,119, 900) (33,427,100) 141,300 141,300 Net decrease in cash (5,212,100) Available cash balance at June 30, 2019, asprojected $ 28,393,300 Department Goals Provide effective communication of project progress and toll operations to the Board members, city councils, County Board of Supervisors, Caltrans, CTC, FHWA, 11F1A, and bondholders. (Policy Goal: Operational Excellence) Objectives: • Provide timely and effective reporting of toll operation metricsincluding revenue, transactions, carpool usage, and other performance indicators. • Share certain expresslane traffic information with Caltransand other agenciesasrequested. • Comply with continuing disclosure requirementsto bondholders and 11F1A regarding express lanesdevelopment and operations. Focus on timely and effective completion of toll -related capital projects and implementation of needed transportation services. (Policy Goals: Quality of Life, Connecting the Economy, Responsible Partner) Objectives: • SLpport the development of the Commission's toll capital projects in all areas of planning, financing, design, and construction. • Provide opportunity for expansion of express bus services to employment centers, asthiswill contribute to congestion relief on impacted corridors. Support regional transportation solutions in cooperation with toll operators in surrounding counties that are of benefit to Rye rside County. (Policy Goals Quality of Life, Operational Excellence, Responsible Partnei) Objectives: • Coordinate with surrounding countiesin theirdevelopment of toll facilitiesin general and those toll facilitiesthat impact the Commission'stoll operationsin particular. • Participate in the CTOC to advance regional and statewide tolling initiatives, technology interoperability, and coordination among California toll agencies. Toll Operations Performance/Workload Indicators FY16/17 Estimated FY16/17 ActuaIs FY17/18 Estimated FY18/19 Projected Toll transactions N/A 5,700,000 20,500,000 18,000,000 Toll revenues N/A $8,000,000 $36,000,000 $32,000,000 Non -toll revenues N/A $1,900,000 $7,700,000 $3,600,000 Community Profile Riverside County is the fourth largest county in California, stretching westward nearly 200 miles from the Colorado River and comprising more than 7200 square miles that include 28 incorporated cities. the County can trace its beginning back to 1893 when votersapproved the formation of a new county. lhe area was carved from parts of San Bernardino and San Diego counties. In its 125 yearsof existence, the County'seconomy hasdiversified and prospered. Originally, the County was very agricultural area, known fora wide variety of crops grown on its fertile soils. the County remains a strong agricultural area, but it is increasingly becoming a leader in manufacturing, transportation, construction, and tourism. Demographics lhe success of the area has brought dramatic population growth to the County (Chart 54). Since the 1980's, the County has been one of the fastest growing counties in the State. Chart 54 — Population — Last Ten Years 2,450,000 2,400,000 2,350,000 2,300,000 2,250 000 2,200,000 2,150,000 2,00,000 ■ 2,050,000 0 2,OQ000 1,950 000 1,900 000 Source: Califomia Department of Rnance N`ti �' �a N5 ry0 �O �O r�0 r�0 r�0 the available and affordable housing in the County has attracted many people to the County (Chart 55); however, housing is gradually recovering from a slowdown due to the effect of the subprime mortgages, ensuing credit crisis, and recession. Chart 55—Home Price Advantage $900,000 $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 Home Value Advantage Riverside Countyand Southern Califomia Markets(February, 2018) ❑Median Home Values $334,400 445,000 110,600 $537,600 $610,800 $203,200 $276,400 $712,600 $378,200 Riverside Los Angeles Source: California Association of Realtors San Diego County Ventura Orange During the growth period, jobs also increased as many firms relocated to the area and moved away from older communities. During the recent economic slowdown, the County's unemployment rate rose to an all-time high; however, the unemployment rate has decreased significantly during the recovery period (Chart 56). Chart 56 — Unemployment Rate (%) — Last Ten Years 16.0 % 14.0 % 12.0 % 10.0 % =_ 8.0 % e 6.0 4.0 2.0 % 0.0 % 6g) 1� Source: Califomia Employment DevelopmentDepartment 15 1b 1� riO �O ry0 the area is preparing for itsfuture aswell in supporting better education. the County is home to a number of colleges and universities including UCR Riverside County's economy is benefitting from employment gains. Population migration to the Inland Empire has occurred due to the area's employment opportunities and a lower cost of living compared to the coastal counties. Although wage growth has been flat and centered on lower and moderate income, improvements in the local labor market with increased economic activity support stable sales tax revenue growth. Statistical Information Retail Sales As a result of demographic changes and growth, retail sales (Chart 57 and Table 69) in the County have shown continued improvementsfollowing the recent recession. Chart 57 —Retail Sales(%) - $34 1241lion —2016 Data Totalallother services& outlets 29.82% OtherRetallaalesJ 7.16% Apparelaores 6.40% General poio Merchandise 8.92% Automotive 22.65% Food sores 4.60% 4411 & Electronics I 4.05% LBuilding Materials 5.74% -00111111111111111 Eating & Drinking 10.66% Table 69-Rvenside County Taxable Sales by Business Type (in 000's) -Last Five Years 20161 2015 2014 2013 2012 Apparel Sores $ 2,136,727 $ 1,989,623 $ 1,771,603 $ 1,672,482 General Merchandise 3,040,243 3,289,057 3,298,920 3,174,022 Food Sores 1,727,517 1,509,403 1,421,590 1,356,148 Eating & Drinking 3,384,494 3,093,862 2,836,388 2,668,324 Household & Electronics 1,135,234 1,030,454 996,484 930,068 Building Materials 1,826,293 1,706,183 1,535,178 1,364,513 Automotive 7,693,172 7,844,773 7,421,523 7,009,138 Other Retail Sales 2,338,039 2,182,987 1,781,754 1,841,973 Total all other services&outlets 9,629,185 9,389,345 9,002,027 8,079,341 2,190, 228 3,052,409 1,574,030 3,648,980 1,386, 985 1,965,101 7,751, 812 2,452,591 10,209,008 $ 34,231,144 $ 32,910,904 $ 32,035,687 $ 30,065,467 $ 28,096,009 aurce: Sate Board of Equalization Year repre se ntsmosl recent data available lhe 2016 taxable sales generation by jurisdiction in the County, including ranking compared to 2006, ispresented in Table 70. Table 70 Taxable Sales Generation by Jurisdiction in Rye rside County for20161 Taxable Sales(in 000's) %of Total 2016 2006 City of riverside City of Corona City of Temecula City of Palm Desert City of Moreno Valley City of Murrieta City of Palm Springs City of Hemet City of Indio City of Perris City of Jurupa Valley City of Lake Elsinore City of Cathedral City City of La Quinta City of Eastvale City of Menifee City of Norco City of Rancho Mirage City of Beaumont City of Coachella City of San Jacinto City of Banning City of Blythe City of Wildomar City of Desert Hot Springs City of Indian Wells City of Calimesa City of Canyon Lake Incorporated Unincorporated county area Countywide California Source: California State Board of Equalization t Yearrepre.ntsmost recent data available 5,507,805 16.1 % 2 2 3,396,905 9.9% 3 3 3,208,193 9.4% 4 4 1,618,078 4.7/0 5 5 1,571,730 4.6% 6 6 1,340,131 3.9% 7 7 1,067,028 3.1% 8 10 1,015,877 3.0% 9 8 986,137 2.9% 10 11 980,763 2.9% 11 14 888,190 2.6% 12 N/A 791,622 2.3% 13 13 790,202 2.3% 14 9 724,252 2.1 % 15 12 633,526 1.9% 16 N/A 628,923 1.8% 17 N/A 565,886 1.7/0 18 15 459,544 1.3% 19 16 414,906 1.2% 20 19 299,236 0.9% 21 17 244,673 0.7/0 22 21 192,449 0.6% 23 18 150,104 0.4% 24 20 146,087 0.4% 25 N/A 125,456 0.4% 26 23 106,587 0.3% 27 22 63,982 0.2% 28 24 20,820 0.1% 29 25 27,939,092 6,292,052 81.9% 18.1% 34,231,144 100.0% $ 649,079,371 Measure A Sales Taxes Measure A is one-half of one cent transaction and use tax for transportation improvements in the County. the County had an 8.00% sales tax rate including the Measure A rate through December 2016. In January 2017, it increased 0.25% to 8.25% and in April 2018, it decreased 0.50% to 7.75% (Table 71). Table 71 -Direct and Overlapping Sales Tax Rates -Last Five Years Fiscal Year Measure A Direct Rate County of Riverside 2018 0.50% 7.75% 2017 0.50% 8.25% 2016 0.50% 8.00% 2015 0.50% 8.00% 2014 0.50% 8.00% Source: Commission Finance Department and California of Tax and Fee Administration Snce the end of the recent economic slowdown, changes have occurred in the economic categories in which the Measure A sales tax was generated (Table 72). General retail and transportation represent the two highest economic categoriesand approximately 53.6%of sales taxesgenerated. Transportation hasdecreased in recent yearsdue to lowerfuel pricesoffset by increasesin new auto purchases. Table 72 -Sales Tax by Economic Category Economic Category 2014/4 2015/4 2016/4 2017/4 %of Total %of Total %of Total %of Total General Retail 28.4% 28.8% 28.9% 28.3% Transportation 26.6% 25.9% 25.1% 25.3% Food Products 16.6% 17.3% 17.7% 17.6% Businessto Business 14.4% 15.1% 15.3% 15.6% Construction 12.0% 10.8% 10.8% 10.8% Miscellaneous 2.0% 2.1% 2.2% 2.4% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Source: MuniServices, LLC Each economic category consists of several economic segments, which provide additional information regarding economic activity in the County. In 2012 the top six economic segments consisted of service stations, department stores, auto sales -new, restaurants, building materials - wholesale, and miscellaneous retail. Over the next five calendar years, auto sales -new, restaurants, and department stores moved into the top three economic segments. lhe top six economic segmentsin 2017 with comparisonsto previousyearsare presented in Table 73. Table 73 -Sales Tax by Economic Segment Top 5x Economic Segments(Category) Auto Sales- New (Transportation) Restaurants(Food Products) Department Stores (General Retail) Service Stations(Transportation) Miscellaneous Retail (Miscellaneous) Building Materials -Wholesale (Construction) Source: Muni�rvices, LLC 2014/4 2015/4 2016/4 2017/4 %of Total %of Total %of Total %of Total 10.9% 11.7/0 11.8% 11.5% 10.4% 11.0% 11.4% 11.5% 10.4% 10.4% 10.1 % 9.9% 10.3% 8.5% 7.2% 7.7% 7.0% 7.2% 7.4% 7.4% 7.5% 6.2% 6.1 % 6.0% Commission Facts Programs and Services Measure A: The Commission administers Measure A, the local half -cent sales tax for new transportation projects in the County. Under Measure A, funding is used to improve highways, commuter rail, regional arterials, local streets and roads, transit and specialized transportation services including commuter assistance, economic development, new corridors, and Commission administration. Measure A expires in 2039. Transportation Development Act: The TDA is comprised of two elements: Local Transportation Fund and State Transit Assistance funding. The Commission administers the LTF one -quarter of one cent of the state sales tax on behalf of the County. STA is generated from the statewide sales tax on diesel fuel and is allocated by the State to the Commission on the basis of population and as a percentage of transit fare revenues. TDA funding is allocated primarily to bus and rail transit operators for transit operating and capital needs. Additionally, LTFfunding is available for bicycle and pedestrian facilities, planning, and administration and allocated to the Commission and local jurisdictionsin the County. Highways: The Commission assists with the planning and funding for highway improvements. Major current projects include: 91 Project, 1-15 Express Lanes project, and Mid County Parkway. State highway maintenance is generally the responsibility of Caltrans; however, the Commission will be responsible for the operations and maintenance of toll facilities during a 50-year term upon commencement of toll operationsfor each facility. Local Streets and Roads: The Commission administers funding to local jurisdictions to improve streets, intersections, signal coordination, and pavement. Local streets and roads maintenance isthe responsibility of the local jurisdictions. Commuter Rail: The Commission fundsand over%esMetrolink rail serviceswithin the County. The Commission's three Metrolink lines are the Riverside, IEOC, and 91/Perris Valley Lines. The Commission owns and maintains nine Metrolink stations and an operations control center located at: ➢ Riverside Downtown operations control center, 4344 Vine Street, Riverside ➢ Perris —South, 1304 Case Road , Perris ➢ Perris —Downtown, 121 South C Street, Perris ➢ Moreno Valley/March Feld, 14160 Meridian Parkway, Riverside ➢ Riverside —Hunter Park/UCR, 1101 Marlborough Avenue, Riverside ➢ Riverside Downtown station, 4066 Vine Street, Riverside ➢ Riverside —La Serra station, 10901 Indiana Avenue, Riverside ➢ Jurupa Valley—Pedley station, 6001 Ped ley Road, Riverside ➢ Corona —North Main station, 250 East Blaine Street, Corona ➢ Corona —West station, 155 South Auto Center Drive, Corona Motorist Assistance: The Commission provides emergency call boxes and the 511 traveler information system through the SAFEand offers emergency towing servicesthrough the FSP. Commuter Assistance: The Commission provides a variety of rideshare services both to employersand commuters. Through voluntary participation, commutersand employers receive a direct benefit from their sales tax dollars, and the entire region benefits from reduced traffic congestion and improved air quality. Specialized Transit: the Commission maintains a strong commitment to assist in the mobility of those with specialized transit needs. Through its Specialized Transit Program, the Commission has provided millions of dollars to public and nonprofit transit operators to assist in the provisions of special transit servicesto improve the mobility of seniorsand personswith disabilities. Tolled &pressed Lanes: In March 2017, the Commission opened its91 Express Lanes, including a tolled direct connector from SR91 to I-15 south, following the substantial completion of the 91 Project through the city of Corona. A second facility on 1-15 from SR60 to Cajalco Road in Corona is currently under construction with opening expected in 2020. lhe Commission commenced project development for the 15/91 Express Lanes Connector, a tolled direct connectorfrom SR91 to 1-15 north; completion isexpected priorto 2023. In 2017, the Commission began preliminary engineering and environmental stud iesto add express laneson 1-15 between Cajalco Road and SR74. Appendix A — Glossary of Acronyms AB Artrmbly Bill ADA America nswith Disabilities Act ARRA* American Recovery and Reinvestment Act AlP — Active Transportation Program BABs — Build America Bonds Bechtel — Bechtel Infrastructure BNSF — BNSF Ra ilway Board — Board of Commissioners for the Riverside County Transportation Commission CABs — Capitalized Appreciation Bonds CAFR — Comprehensive Annual Financial Report CALCOG California Association of Councilsof Governments California State of California CaIPERS California Public Employees Retirement System Caltrans California Department of Transportation Capital Projects — Capital Projects Development and Delivery, a RCTC department CARB — California Air Resources Board CCTV — Closed -Circuit Television CDTFA — California Department of Tax and Fee Administration CEQA — California Environmental Quality Act CETAP — Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process CHP California Highway Patrol CHSRA California High Speed Rail Authority CIBs Current Interest Bonds CIP — Capital Improvement Plan CMA — Congestion Management Agency CMAQ* — Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality CMIA* — Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (Proposition 1B funding category) CMP — Congestion Management Program Commission Riverside County Transportation Commission Coordinated Plan Coordinated Public Transit —Human ServicesTransportation Plan County County of Riverside CTC — California Transportation Commission CTOC — California Toll Operators Committee CTS4 — Consolidated Transportation Service Agency CVAG — Coachella Valley Association of Governments DBE — Disadvantaged Business Enterprise District — Riverside County Regional Park and Open Space District DMV — Department of Motor Vehicles EMMA — Electronic Municipal Market Access system managed by the Municipal SecuritiesRulemaking Board ERP Enterprise Resource Planning EIC Employer Transportation Coordinators FASTAct — Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act FHWA* — Federal Highway Administration Fitch — Fitch Ratings FRA — Federal Railroad Administration FSP — Freeway Service Pa t ro I FTA* — Federal Transit Administration FTE — Full-time Equivalent FTIP — Federal Transportation Improvement Program FY — Fiscal Year Gann — Gann Initiative approved by California voters in 1979 GASB — Governmental Accounting Standards Board GFOA — Government Finance Officers Association GHG — Greenhouse Gas HOV — High Occupancy Vehicle (Carpool Lane) HSIPR — High Speed Intercity PascongerRail I — Interstate 1E511 — Inland Empire 511 IECommuter — Inland Empire Commuter rideshare system IEOC — Inland Empire —Orange County Metrolink Service IIP* — Interregional Improvement Program Inland Empire — Region covering Riverside and San Bernardino counties LCTOP — Low Carbon Transit Operations Programs Limited Tax Bonds Indebtednesssecured by specified tax or group of taxes LOS Level of Service LOSSA N — Los Angeles -San Diego -San Luis Obispo, a rail corridor LRTP — Long Range Transportation Plan OF* — Local Transportation Fund MAP-21 — Moving Ahead for Prog ress in the 21st Century MARA — 2009 Measure A Regional Arterial funding for Western County MCP — Mid County Parkway Measure K — Increase of salestax revenue bondsdebt limit to $975 million approved by voters in November2010 Metrolink — Operating Name for SCRRA (see RRA) Moody's — Moody'sInvestors Service MOE — Maintenance of Effort MOU — Memorandum of Understanding MPO — Metropolitan Planning Organization MSHCP — Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan MSRC — Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (AB2766) NEPA — National Environmental Policy Act OA — Obligation Authority OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority Parsons Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. PerrisValley Line — PerrisValley Line Metrolink Extension Project PPM — Planning, Programming, and Monitoring PVL — PerrisValley Line Metrolink Extension Project RCA — Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority RCTC — Riverside County Transportation Commission RDOCC — Riverside Downtown Operations Control Center RFA — Request for Authorization RIP* — Regional Improvement Program RTA — Riverside Transit Agency RIP — Regional Transportation Plan RRIPA — Regional Transportation Planning Agencies RZEDBs — Recovery Zone Economic Development Bonds S&P — Standard & Poor'sRating Service SAFE — Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies Salestax — Reference including transaction and use tax such as Measure A SB SBC TA SBE SCAG SC RRA SC S SDP SG R SHC C SJBL SR SR1P STA * Stantec State State Street Bank SIBG* STI P* SIP* am Line TA C TAP TC EP TC 1 F* TDA* 11FiA* 11P lUM F* UC R U.S. DOT Western County WRCOG 91 Express Lanes 91 Project 1989 Measure A* 2009 Measure A* 2010A Bonds 2010B Bonds 2013 Sales Tax Bonds 2013 TIFIA Loan 2013 Toll Bonds - Senate Bill - San Bernardino County Transportation Authority - Small Business Enterprise - Southern California Association of Governments - Southern California Regional Rail Authority Sustainable Communities Strategy Service Development Plan State of Good Repair (SB 1 Program) - Self -Help Counties Coalition - San Jacinto Branch Line - State Route - Short Range Transit Plan - State Transit Assistance - Stantec Consulting ServicesInc. - State of California - State Street Bank and Trust Company Surface Transportation Block Grant (replaced SIP) State Transportation Improvement Program - airface Transportation Program - amLine Transit Agency - Technical Advisory Committee - Transportation Alternatives Prog ra m - Trade Corridor Enhancement Program - Trade Corridors Improvement Fund (Proposition 1Bfunding category) - Transportation Development Act Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Transportation Improvement Plan Transportation/Traffic Uniform Mitigation Fee (Western County/Coachella Valley) - University of California at Riverside - United States Department of Transportation - Western area of Riverside County - Western Riverside Council of Governments - Tolled expresslaneson SR-91 in Orange County operated by OCTA (OCTA 91 Express Lanes) and in Riverside County by the Commission (RCTC 91 Express Lanes) SR-91 corridor improvement project consisting of two tolled express lanes in each direction of SR-91 between the Orange County line and 1-15, the addition of a general purpose lane between SR71 and 1-15, and other improvements - Original 1/2 cent transportation salestax measure approved by voters in November 1988 that expired in June 2009 - Extension of sales tax measure approved by voters in November 2002which became effective upon expiration of original salestax measure on July 1, 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series A Tax-exempt issued in November2010 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series B Taxable issued in November2010 - SalesTax Revenue Bondsissaed in July 2013forthe 91 Project - 11FIA Loan executed in July 2013 for the 91 Project - Toll Revenue Bondsissued in July 2013 forthe 91 Project 2016 Refunding Bonds 2017A Bonds 2017BRefunding Bonds 2017 TIRA Loan 2018 Refunding Bonds - Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds issued in September 2016to refund the SeriesA portion of bonds issued in 2009 - Sales Tax Revenue Bonds issued in July 2017 for the 1-15 Express Lanes project and completion of the 91 Project - Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds issued in December 2017 to refund all of the outstanding 2010A Bonds and a portion of the 2013 Sales Tax Bonds TIFIA Loan executed in July 2017 for the 1-15 Express Lanes project - Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds ivied in April 2018 to refund all of the SeriesBand SeriesC bonds issued in 2009 *Additional information provided in Funding Definitions. Appendix B—Glossary of Funding Definitions Federal Funding Sources Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act The 11FIA program providescredit assistance forqualified projectsof regional and national significance that are critical improvementsto the nation'ssurface transportation system. It is designed to fill market gaps and leverage substantial private and non-federal co - investment by providing supplemental and subordinate capital. TIFIA credit assistance is often available on more advantageous terms than in the financial market making it possible to obtain financing, in the form of a secured loan, loan guarantee, and/or standby line of credit, for needed projectswhen it might not otherwise be possible. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Commonly referred to asthe Stimulusorlhe Recovery Act, ARRA isan economic stimulus package "intended to create jobs and promote investment and consumer spending" during the recent recession. It includesdomestic spending in infrastructure with investment transportation, environmental protection, and other infrastructure providing long-term economic benefits. ARRA also created the Build America Bond program, which authorized state and local governments to issue in 2009 and 2010 such bonds as taxable bonds to finance capital expenditures for which would otherwise be financed with tax-exempt governmental bonds. State and local governments issuing BABs receive a direct federal subsidy payment for a portion of their borrowing costson BABsequal to 35 to 45 percent of the total coupon interest paid to investors. The BABprogram wasintended to assist state and local govemmentsfinance capital projectsat lower borrowing costsand to stimulate the economy and create jobs. Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 formula funds made available to urbanized areas for operating subsidies, capital projects and planning. Operating match is up to 50%of the net operating cost; capital and planning match is80%federal and 20%local. Section 5309 discretionary funds generally provided to urbanized areas for funding new start rail projects, major busfleet replacement, and transit facility construction. Matching ratios range from 50/50to 80%fed era l and 20%local. Section 5310 funds made available to statesfor providing capital support to private non- profit and, in certain circumstances, public transit operators. This is a state administered discretionary program providing fundson an 88.53%federal and 11.47/0local basis. Section 5311 funds provided to support rural transit operating subsidies and capital projects. Operating match is up to 50% of the net operating cost; capital match is 80% federal and 20%local. Federal Highway Administration In 1991, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) was approved by Congressto replace the former Federal Aid Urban/Federal Aid System funding programs. ISTEA was established as six -year funding program and was reauthorized for another six years in 1997. Thisnew transportation act wasrenamed asthe Transportation Equity Act of the Twenty-first Century (TEA21) and was extended through August 10, 2005 when the President signed into law the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). Nine short-term extensions of SAFETEA-LU were paced until July 2012 when Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) was enacted. In December2015, the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act was signed into law and became the first federal law in over decade to provide long-term funding certainty for surface transportation infrastructure. Under these programs the following fund sources are allocated to each county, and the Commission further allocatesthese fundsbased on federal provisions. Surface Transportation Block Grant (formerly Surface Transportation Program) Fundsallocated by the Commission and administered by Caltransthat provide funding for local street and road improvements. Current matching rate is88.53%federal and 11.47% local. Congestion Mitigation and AirQuality Funds allocated by the Commission for transportation related air quality improvement projects in air quality non -attainment areas. Current matching rate is 88.53% federal and 11.47%local. Safety projectscan qualify for 100%of CMAQ funding. State Local Funding Sources Transportation Development Act The TDA iscomprised of two elements: LTFand STA funds. LTFfundsare derived from 1/4ofone cent of the state salestaxand are returned to source. There are three areas of apportionment within Riverside County comprised of Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley (Blythe). The Commission administersthe LTFon behalf of the County of Riverside. Funds are provided for program administration, Southern California Association of Governments regional planning, local transportation planning, and transit services in Western County and the Coachella Valley. In the Palo Verde Valley, funds support transit services and local street and road improvements. Additionally, under S3821, 2%of LTFfundsare made available for bicycle and pedestrian projects. STA fundsare generated from the statewide salestax on diesel fuel and are allocated by the state to the Commission based on population and as a percentage of transit fare revenue. The Commission hasgenerally used these fundsto support capital purchasesand improvementsasthese fundshave been subject to state budgetary actions. State Transportation Improvement Program The STIP consists of RIP and IIP funds. The RIP and IIP programs are mainly supported by Proposition 42 funding. The RIP component represents 75% of STIP funds available for capacity projects. Regional Transportation Planning Agenciesare responsible forselection of projectsproposed for RlPfunds. The IlPcomponent repre%ntsthe remaining 25%of STIP funds available for capacity projects and Caltrans is responsible for the selection of IIP- funded projects. The Commission and Caltrans District 8 work closely in coordinating projectsforthese fund sources. Proposition 1BProgram In November2006, the votersin California approved Proposition 1B, which will fund various transportation programs from bonds issued by the state of California. Programs to be funded include CM IA, transit capital (PTMISFA), transit security (TSSSDRA), STIPsupplement, goods movement (TCIF), SLPPfunds, and citiesand counties. Cap and Trade State legislation in 2006 requiresGHG emissions in the State to be reduced. A key element of the GHG reduction program isthe Cap and Trade Program in which entities regulated underthe program can "trade" or buy and sell a portion of emission allowancesissued by the CARBat auctions held during the year. The revenuesgenerated for the State through these auctions are appropriated for infrastructure investments that include LCTOP and road programs, high speed rail projects, and transit and intercity rail projects. Local Funding Sources Measure A Measure A isa half -cent local retail transaction and use tax that wasinitially approved by the voters in November 1988 for 20 years (Ordinance 88-1) and extended in November 2002 for an additional 30 years (Ordinance 02-001), through June 2039, to help fund key transportation improvements in Riverside County. It provides funds to improve highways, regional arterials, and local streetsand roads; to develop new transportation corridors; to expand commuter rail, public transit, specialized transportation services, and commuter programs; develop a program of economic incentives to attract commercial and industrial development and jobs; and support bond financing. These types of improvements are needed to maintain and improve the quality of life in the County, reduce current congestion, and provide adequate transportation facilities to accommodate reasonable growth. Since existing state and federal sources provide only a limited amount of funding for a limited number of projects, Measure A will cover the shortfall for key projects with a funding source that is under local control. It will use the revenue generated in Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley to meet the unique transportation needsof each of those areas. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee The TUMF program was adopted by all local jurisdictions in the Western County area of Riverside County in July 2003. Under this program, which is administered by the WRCOG, feesare asseq:Pd on new residential and commercial development in Western County to ensure that new development pays its fair share toward providing the needed infrastructure improvements on the regional system of highways and arterials. In accordance with the extension of Measure A in 2002 and an amended MOU with WRCOG, the Commission shall receive 48.7% of the TUMF revenues to fund equally the regional arterial system and the development of new corridors. Appendix C —Glossary of Program Terms The following explanations of terms are presented to aid in understanding the various program termsused and discurfrd in the narrative. Bicycle and Pedestrian LTF provides revenuesforthe construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilitiesand related right-of-way costs. Bond Financing In order to accomplish the construction of the highway and rail projects and implementation of the local streets and roads and other programs identified in the Measure A TIP as soon as possible, some level of borrowing will be required. A portion of the revenuesgenerated in the Western County will be made available forthispurpose. Commuter Assistance The purpose of this program is to provide short-term incentives to encourage single occupant vehicle drivers to use alternate modes of transportation including carpools, vanpools, bus pools, public bus, commuter rail, walking, and bicycling. Commuter Rail Measure A provides operating and capital revenue for commuter rail service to Orange and Los Angeles counties. LTF provides revenue for commuter rail operations in Riverside County. These trains operate on existing railroad tracks parallel to major freeways. Commuter rail service provides a safe and reliable transit alternative to driving alone during the peak period. Plansto expand commuterrail%rvice in Western Riverside County from Riverside to Perrisvia Moreno Valley are currently underway. Economic Development Measure A will be used to create an infrastructure improvement bank to improve existing interchanges, construct new interchanges, provide public transit linkagesor stations, and make other improvements to the transportation system in Western County. These incentives are intended to attract commercial and industrial development and jobs to locate within the Westem County area. Highways Measure A provides revenues to widen existing highways, expand interchanges, and improve remote freeways. These improvements are needed to control traffic congestion in Western County and improve access and safety in Coachella Valley. Costs of these improvements will be covered by funds from state and federal sources. Measure A revenue will be used to supplement —not replace —these othersourcesand to accelerate work on projectsdeferred for lack of funding. Local Streetsand Roads Measure A provides revenues to local jurisdictions for the construction, repair, and maintenance of local streets and roads. The County and local cities are required to supplement those expenditures with other previously dedicated revenue sources to maintain road improvements at a level equal to or greater than the base year amount. LTF provides revenue for local street and road improvements in the Palo Verde Valley. Metrolink The Commission's commuter rail program is part of the regional network operated by SCRRA operating under the name of Metrolink, a five -county joint powers agency composed of the transportation commissions of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Orange, Riverside, and Ventura. The purpose of this agency is to manage the operation and maintenance of commuter rail in the five -county metropolitan area. Motorist Assistance The Motorist Assistance program hasthree elements. The FSPisa special team of tow trucks that travel on selected Riverside County freeways during peak commute hours to assist drivers when their cars break down. Another element is the call box system, which installation and operation is made possible with revenue provided by the public. Call boxesare being provided by the Commission, which servesasthe County'sSAFE. The third element is the Inland Empire 511 traveler information system. One dollar per year from every motor vehicle registration pays for the call boxes and their operation and maintenance, 1E511 operations, and matching fundsforFSP. New Corridors Four new transportation corridorswere identified through the CETAP. Measure A and TUMFfundswill be used for environmental clearance, right of way, and construction of these new corridors. Public Transit The Commission is the agency responsible for short-range transportation planning and programming and coordinating the operation of all public transportation service within the County. The Commission allocatesand disburseslDA aswell asMeasure A fundsto the transit operatorsfor operating and capital purposes. Regional Arterials Measure A funds generated within the Western County and Coachella Valley areas are used for major regional road projects. The system is to be implemented with a mix of funding required from new development undera Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee to be paid by developersfrom new development and from Measure A fundsretumed to the Western County and Coachella Valley areas. The Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee schedule shall be established in order to generate at least the equivalent of Measure A funding toward the regional arterial system. Specialized Transit Measure A provides public transit revenues to improve transportation services for seniors, personswith disabilitiesand commuters. For seniorsand personswith disabilities, it provides dial -a -ride cab service at night for emergency purposes, guarantees half-price busfares, and assists centers with their transit programs. For commuters, it improves express bus service and expands ridesharing programs. In the Coachella Valley, revenues also are available for busreplacement and local busservice. Transportation Improvement Plan Thisplan also actsasthe County'sexpenditure plan and wasprepared by the Commission for the proposed 1/2%local retail transaction and use tax for transportation purposes to be collected. Thiswasproposed by the Commission asa meansto fill the funding shortfall to implement needed highway, regional arterial, economic development incentives, and new corridors; local street and road programs; commuter rail projects and operations; public bus transit and specialized transportation improvements; commuter assistance programs; and bond financing. Appendix D —Glossary of General Terms The following explanationsoftermsare presented to aid in understanding the narrative discussions and illustrations included in this budget document and the terminology generally used in governmental accounting, auditing, financial reporting, and budgeting. Accountability The state of being obliged to explain one'sactions,tojustify what one does. Accountability requiresa government to answerto itscitizenry to justify the raising of public resourcesand the purposesfor which they are used. Accounting System The methodsand recordsestablished to identify, agmmble, analyze, classify, record, and report a government's transactions and to maintain accountability for the related a -.rats and liabilities. Accrual Basisof Accounting The accounting of the financial effects of transactions, events, and interfund activities when they occur, regardlessof when cash isreceived or paid. Audit A systematic collection of the sufficient, competent evidential matter needed to attest to the faimessof management'saq,zPrtionsin the financial statementsorto evaluate whether management has efficiently and effectively carried out its responsibilities. The auditor obtainsthisevidential matterthrough inspection, observation, inquiries, and confirmations with third parties. Balanced Budget The identification of revenues and other financing sources as well as available fund balances to fund operating and capital expenditures and other financing uses on an annual basis. Basisof Accounting A term used to refer to when the effects of transactions or events are recognized for financial reporting purposes. For example, the timing of recognition can be when the transaction or event occurs(accrual basis) orwhen cash isreceived or paid (cash basis). Bond A written promise to pay a specified sum of money (face or principal amount) at a specified date or dates in the future (maturity date), together with periodic interest at a specified rate. Bondsare primarily used to finance capital projects. Budget A plan of financial activity for a specified period indicating all planned revenues and expendituresfor the budget period. Annual budgetsare usually required by law and are e-mntial to sound financial management. The Commission prepares an annual budget that isapplicable to a single fiscal year. Budgetary Control The control or management of a govemment in accordance with an approved budget to keep expenditures within the limitations of available appropriations and available revenues. Budget Document The instrument used by the budget -making authority to present a comprehensive financial program to the appropriating governing body. Capital Outlay Expenditures resulting in the acquisition of or addition to the government's capital agrots ora9mtsto be transferred to Caltrans, such ashighway projects. Capital Project A long-term strategic project requiring relatively large sums of revenues, accumulated reserves, and/or financing to acquire, develop, construct, improve, and/or maintain a capital assct such asland, buildings, and infrastructure. Capital Projects Fund A governmental fund type created to account for financial resourcesto be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital projects. The Commission has two capital projectsfundsfor Commercial Paper and Sales Tax Bondsto account for debt proceeds from 2009 Measure A commercial paper notes and sales tax revenue bonds related to highway, commuter rail, regional arterial, and local streets and roads projects and one capital project fund for Toll Revenue Bondsto account for proceeds from toll -supported debt related to toll facilities. Commercial Paper An unsecured short-term promissory note issued primarily by corporations with maturities ranging from two to 270 days. The credit risk of almost all commercial paper israted by a rating service. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report A financial report that encompa9msall funds of the government. In the financial section of the CAFR are the basic financial statements and required supplementary information aswellascombining and ind ivid ual fund financial statements, asnecessary. The CAFRaIso containsintroductory information and statistical data. Current Financial Resources Measurement Focus A measurement focus that reports on the near -term or current inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable financial resources. This focus is unique to accounting and financial reporting for state and local govemmentsand is used for reporting the financial position and resultsof operationsof governmental funds. Debt An obligation resulting from the borrowing of money or from the purchase of goods and services. Debtsof govemmentsinclude bonds, time warrants, and notes. Debt Coverage Ratio The ratio of pledged revenuesto related debt service fora given year. Debt Limit The maximum amount of outstanding grossor net debt legally permitted. Debt Proceeds The difference between the face amount of debt and the issuance discount or the sum of the face amount and the issuance premium. Debt proceeds differ from cash receipts to the extent issuance costs, such asunderwriters' fees, are withheld by the underwriter. Debt Service Fund A govemmental fund type created to account forthe accumulation of resourcesfor and payment of general long-term debt principal and interest. the Commission hastwo debt service fundsfor itssalestax revenue bondsand for itstoll revenue bonds. Economic Resources Measurement Focus A measurement focus that reports on all inflows, outflows, and balances affecting or reflecting the entity's net position. ibis focus is used for proprietary funds as well as for govemment-wide financial reporting. Expenditures Represents decreases in net financial resources on the transfer of property or services for acquiring an asset, service, or settling a loss. Financial Advisor In the context of the issuance of debt, a consultant who advises the issuer on any of a variety of matters related to the issuance. the financial advisor sometimes also is referred to asthe fiscal consultant. Financial Audit An audit made to provide independent assurance whether the financial statementsof a government are presented fairly in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Financial Resources Resources that are or will become available for spending and include cash, resources ordinarily expected to be converted to cash such as receivables, inventory, and prepaid aril -Ms. Fiscal Year For the Commission, the 12-month period that begins July 1 and ends June 30 of the designated fiscal or operating yearfor accounting and budgeting purposes. Fund A fiscal and accounting entity with a self -balancing set of accounts in which cash and other financial resources, all related liabilities, and residual equities or balances, and changes therein, are recorded and segregated to carry on specific activities or attain certain objectivesin accordance with special regulations, restrictions, or limitations. Fund Balance the excessofa governmental fund'sarrrtsover its liabilities. Fund Type Any one of eleven classifications into which all funds are categorized in governmental accounting. Govemmental fund types include general, special revenue, debt service, capital projects, and permanent funds. Proprietary fund types include enterprise and internal service funds. Fiduciary fund types include pension trust, investment trust, and private -purpose trust fundsand agency funds. GASB 68 Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions, issued by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board implemented by the Commission in FY 2014/15. GASB 48 requires reporting the net pension liability of the plan on the accrual accounting -based financial statements and enhancing the notes to the financial statementsto provide a more comprehensive picture of the pension obligation and costs. General Fund lhe governmental fund type used to account for all financial resources, except those required to be accounted for in anotherfund. General Ledger A record containing the accounts needed to reflect the financial position and the results of operations of a govemment. In double -entry bookkeeping, debit balancesequal the credit balancesin the general ledger. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles(GAAP) Minimum standards and guidelines for financial accounting and reporting. GAAP encompasses the conventions, rules, and procedures that serve as the norm for the fair presentation of financial statements. lhe GASBisthe primary authoritative accounting and financial reporting standard -setting body on the application of GAAPto state and local governments. Generally Accepted Auditing Standards(GAAS) Rules and procedures established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) for the conduct of a financial audit. lhere are ten basic GAAS, classified into three broad categories: general standards, standards of fieldwork, and standards of reporting. lhe Auditing Standards Board of the AICPA publishes Statements on Auditing Standards(SAS) and related interpretations to comment and expand upon these basic standards. Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards(GAGAS) Standards established by the General Accounting Office (GAO) in its publication, Government Auditing Standards, for the conduct and reporting of both financial and performance auditsin the public sector. GAGASset forth general standardsapplicable to both types of audits and separate standards of fieldwork and reporting for financial and performance audits. lhe GAGASstandardsof fieldwork and reporting for financial audits incorporate and build upon GAAS. Governmental Funds Funds generally used to account for tax -supported activities. lhe Commission's governmental fundsare comprised of general, special revenue, debt service, and capital projectsfunds. Grant A contribution by a government or other organization to support a particular function or program. Independent Auditor An auditor meeting the independence criteria set forth in GAASand GAGAS. Internal Control Policies and procedures established to provide reasonable assurance that specific government objectiveswill be achieved. Legal Level of Budgetary Control the level at which a government's management may not reallocate resources without special approval from the legislative body. Loans Receivable An asset account reflecting amountsloaned to individualsororganizationsextemalto the Commission, including notestaken assecurity for such loans. Measurement Focus The objective of a measurement that is what is being express.d in reporting a government's financial performance and position. A particular measurement focus considers not only which resourcesare measured (financial or economic), but also when the effects of transactions or events involving those resources are recognized (basis of accounting).The measurement focusofthe Commission'sgovemment-wide and fiduciary fund financial statements is economic resources, whereas the measurement focus of governmental fund financial statements iscurrent financial resources. Modified Accrual Basis The accrual basisof accounting adapted to the govemmentalfunds' measurement focus according to which revenues and other financial resource increments (e.g., bond issue proceeds) are recognized when they become susceptible to accrual, that is when they become both "measurable" and "available to finance expenditures of the current period." Expenditures are recognized when the fund liability is incurred except for unmatured interest on general long-term debt and certain similar accrued obligations when due. The Commission's govemmental funds are accounted for using the modified accrual basisof accounting. Other Financing Sources Amounts classified separately from revenues to avoid distorting revenue trends that represent an increase in current financial resources. Other financing sources generally include general long-term debt proceeds, amountsequalto the present value of minimum lease paymentsarising from capital leases, proceedsfrom the sale of capital ao;,cts, and transfers in. Other Financing Uses Amounts classified separately from expenditures to avoid distorting expenditure trends and represent a decrease in current financial resources. Other financing uses generally include transfers out and the amount of refunding bond proceeds deposited with the escrow agent. Overhead Indirect costs that cannot be specifically associated with a given service, program, or department and thus, cannot be clearly associated with a particularfunctional category. Principal In the context of bondsother than deep -discount debt, the face value or par value of a bond or issue of bondspayable on stated datesof maturity. Pro g ra m Group activities, operations, ororganizational unitsdirected to attaining specific purposes or objectives. Program Budget A budget wherein expenditures are based primarily on the functions or activities of a government ratherthan to specific itemsof cost orto specific departments. Purchase Order A document authordng the delivery of specified merchandise orthe rendering of certain servicesand the making of charge forthem. Refunding Bonds Bonds issued to retire bonds already outstanding. lhe proceeds of refunding bonds may be used to repay the previously issued debt (current refunding) or to be placed with an escrow agent and invested until used to pay principal and interest on old debt at a future date (advance refunding). Reimbursement Grant A grant for which a potential recipient must first incur qualifying expendituresto be eligible. Restricted Fund Balance Those portions of fund balance which are restricted for specific purposes by third parties or enabling legislation. Special Revenue Fund A governmental fund type used to account for the proceedsof specific revenue sources (other than major capital projects) that are legally restricted to expenditure for specified purposes. lhe Commission maintainsspecial revenue fundsfor Measure A Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley; Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee; Freeway Service Patrol; Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies; State Transit Assistance; Local Transportation Fund; Coachella Valley/San Gorgonio Pass; and Other Agency Projects. Tra nsfe rs All interfund transfers representing flows of aryrts between funds of the govemment without equivalent flowsof ascPtsin return and without a requirement for repayments. Trustee A fiduciary holding property on behalf of another. Appendix E-Salary Schedule Effective 7/5/2018 Department/Position Exempt/ Range Monthly Monthly Non - RE No. Minimum Maximum Exempt ADM INISIRA11O N Administrative Assistant 1.0 17 $ 4,004 $ 5,405 NE Clerk of the Board 1.0 45 $ 7,928 $ 10,702 E Deputy Clerk of the Board 1.0 32 $ 5,771 $ 7,791 NE Human Resources Administrator 1.0 45 $ 7,928 $ 10,702 E I.T. Administrator 1.0 45 $ 7,928 $ 10,702 E RecordsTechnician 1.0 17 $ 4,004 $ 5,405 NE nior Administrative Assistant 1.0 25 $ 4,867 $ 6,570 NE .@nior Office Assistant 1.0 13 $ 3,632 $ 4,903 NE Administration Subtotal: 8.0 CABiALPROJECTDEVELOPMENT AND DELIVERY Capital Projects M anager 4.0 53 $ 9,636 $ 13,009 E Fa c ilitie s Ad min istra to r 1.0 45 $ 7,928 $ 10,702 E Project Delivery Director 1.0 67 $ 13,559 $ 18,304 E Fight of Way Manager 1.0 53 $ 9,636 $ 13,009 E Se nior Management Analyst 2.0 43 $ 7,550 $ 10,193 E Management Analyst 1.0 35 $ 6,211 $ 8,385 E Capital Reject Development and Delivery Subtotal: 10.0 IXEC UWE M ANAG EM ENT Deputy Executive Director 1.0 75 $ 16,481 $ 22,249 E Executive Director 1.0 83 $ 20,033 $ 27,044 E Executive Ma na ge ment Subtota l: 2.0 ii RNANCE Accountant Accounting Assistant Accounting Technician Chief Rnancial Officer Deputy Director of Rnance Procurement Analyst Procurement Manager %nior Rnanc ial Analyst Rnance Subtotal: Ede ma I Affa irs Ede rna I Affa irs Dire c to r GoodsMovement Manager Legislative AffairsManager Public AffairsManager 1.0 33 $ 5,916 $ 7,986 E 2.0 17 $ 4,004 $ 5,405 NE 2.0 25 $ 4,867 $ 6,570 NE 1.0 67 $ 13,559 $ 18,304 E 1.0 57 $ 10,496 $ 14,170 E 1.0 36 $ 6,363 $ 8,590 E 1.0 53 $ 9,636 $ 13,009 E 1.0 43 $ 7,550 $ 10,193 E 10.0 1.0 63 $ 12,298 $ 16,603 E 1.0 51 $ 9,177 $ 12,389 E 1.0 51 $ 9,177 $ 12,389 E 1.0 51 $ 9,177 $ 12,389 E M ULIIM O DAL SERV IC ES Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager 1.0 51 $ 9,177 $ 12,389 E MultimodalrvicesDirector 1.0 63 $ 12,298 $ 16,603 E Management Analyst 2.0 35 $ 6,211 $ 8,385 E Tansit Manager 1.0 51 $ 9,177 $ 12,389 E MultimodaI Services Subtotal: 5.0 BANNING AND PROGRAMMING SERVICES Banning and Programming Director 1.0 63 $ 12,298 $ 16,603 E Banning and Programming Manager 1.0 51 $ 9,177 $ 12,389 E �nior Management Analyst 1.0 43 $ 7,550 $ 10,193 E Management Analyst 1.0 35 $ 6,211 $ 8,385 E . Planning and Programming Se rvices Subtotal: 4.0 - RAIL MAINIENANC E AN D 0PER411O NS RailManager 1.0 51 $ 9,177 $ 12,389 E Management Analyst 1.0 35 $ 6,211 $ 8,385 E Rail Maintenance and Operations Subtotal: 2.0 10LL0PER4110NS Capital Project Manager nior Management Analyst Toll OperationsManager Toll Program Director Toll Project Manager Toll Technology Manager 1.0 53 $ 9,636 $ 13,009 E 1.0 43 $ 7,550 $ 10,193 E 1.0 63 $ 12,298 $ 16,603 E 1.0 71 $ 14,949 $ 20,181 E 1.0 65 $ 12,913 $ 17,433 E 1.0 53 $ 9,636 $ 13,009 E Toll Operations Subtotal: 6.0 101ALAUh10R12ID POSI110NS Administration 8.0 Capital Project Development and Delivery 10.0 Executive Management 2.0 Rnance 10.0 Exte rna I Affairs 4.0 M ultimodal cervices 5.0 Banning and Programming cervices 4.0 Rail Maintenance and Operations 2.0 Toll Operations 6.0 Total Authorized Positions 51.0 1 PRO POSED BUDG ET FIALYEAR2018/19 Michele Cisneros, Deputy Directorof Irinance Th e re sia Trevino, Chief 1 min a n c is 1 Officer Budget Summary Er Beginning Fund Balance (7/1/2018) Revenues 616, 599, 300 Debt Proceeds 106, 081, 000 Tra nsfe rs In 181,899,300 Total Estimated Sources Expenditures/Expenses Debt Service TransfersOut (804,653,800) (96,675,600) (181,899,3001 Total Estimated Uses Uses Over Sources (offset by beginning fund balance) Ending Fund Balance (6/30/2019) 2018/ 1 $ 789,451,200 904, 579, 600 (1,083,228,700) (178,649,100) $ 610, 802,100 r r Revenues/SourcesComparison FY2016/17 FY2017/18 FY2017/18 Actual Revised Bud • et Pro'ected FY2018/19 Percent Bud et Chan Measure A SalesTax OFSalesTax STA SalesTax Federal reimbursements State reimbursements Local reimbursements lUM F Tolls, Penalties, and Fees Otherrevenues Investment income Total Revenues Debt proceeds 11FIA loan proceeds Tra n sf e rs in Total Revenues/Sources $ 175,320,200 88,206,900 6,432,600 20,201,700 8,538,500 3,727,400 19,594,800 10,125,300 6,746,000 4,495,300 343,388,700 114,554,000 143,358,100 188,488,900 $ 789,789,700 $ 181,000,000 91,000,000 10,469,000 78,563,200 16,589,100 6,840,100 22,250,000 16,835,800 2,803,700 3,509,400 429,860,300 755,972,000 81,810,000 313,676,500 $ 1,581,318,800 $ 181,000,000 91, 000, 000 20,204,800 105,408,300 8,275,100 7,435,100 22,250,000 42,812,600 574,200 7,595,300 486,555,400 752,488,800 298,371,800 $ 1,537,416,000 $ 187,000,000 94,000,000 23,203,600 59,105,700 165,442,400 24,037,900 22,922,200 36,940,500 1 539,000 3,408,000 616, 599, 300 106,081,000 181,899,300 $ 904,579,600 3% 3% 122% - 25% 897% 251 -3% 43% -100% 30% - 42% - 43% 3 Summary of Expenditures, Expenses, and Uses Management Services Regional Programs Capital Project Development and Delivery Toll Operations Debt Service TransfersOut Total Expenditures, Expenses, and Uses FY 2018/ 19 Budget $ 10, 068, 300 226, 564, 300 550,654,400 17, 366, 800 96,675,600 181, 899, 300 $ 1, 083, 228, 700 Percentage of 100% Management Services Expe nditures/ Uses FY 2016/ 17 FY 2017/ 18 FY 2017/ 18 FY 2018/ 19 Ac to . Revised Bud • et Pro ' e c to Bud e Executive Management Administration Extemal Affairs Finance Debt Service Total Expenditures TransfersOut Total Management Services Executive Management 6% $ 73,200 1,615,600 1,428,000 3,518,000 24,900 $ 507,300 $ 2,619,400 2,194,200 4,549,400 391,600 2,280,200 2,158,600 3,186,900 6,659,700 9,870,300 8,017,300 10,000,000 13,277,000 13,199,900 $ 16,659,700 $ 23,147,300 $ 21,217,200 Administration 29% Exte ma I Affa irs 22% Finance 43% $ 539,600 2,939,600 2,228,900 4,360,200 10,068,300 13,183,400 $ 23,251,700 Regional Programs Expenditures/Uses Planning and Programming Services Rail Maintenance and Operations Public and Specialized Transit CommuterAssistance Motorist Assistance Total Expenditures TransfersOut Total Regional Programs Planning and Programming 8% Rail Maintenance and ❑perations 16% FY2016/17 FY2017/18 Actual Revised Budgq=11 $ 2,541,000 24,298,600 82,798,500 2,686,100 4,177,200 116,501,400 22,855,100 $ 139,356,500 $ 13,007,100 36,283,500 122,719,100 4,143,000 4,693,900 180,846,600 29,722,800 210,569,400 FY 2017/ 18 Projectedigt 6,153,300 29, 059, 700 104,905,000 3,860,900 4,022,200 148,001,100 28,763,000 176,764,100 FY 2018/ 19 Budget 19,508,800 36,236,900 160,131,400 4,501,300 6,185,900 226,564,300 35,704,600 262,268,900 Public and Specialized Transit 71% Commuter Assistance 2% Motorist Assistance Capital Project Development & Delivery Expenditures/Uses FY 2016/ 17 Actual FY 2017/ 18 Revised Bud • et FY 2017/ 18 Pro'e c to d FY 2018/ 19 Bud et Percentage of Expenditures/ Uses Salariesand benefits Professional costs Support costs Projectsand operations: Program operations Engineering Construction Design build Right of way and land Local streetsand roads Regional arterials Other(specialstudies/operating & capital disbursements) Debt service Total Expenditures Transfersout Total Capital Project Development & Delivery $ 3,306,500 $ 3,606,400 $ 18,980,600 10,260,200 710,500 951,500 5,580,800 10,527,900 3,167,700 8,764,500 35,590,400 67,102,400 170,452,800 192,599,700 27,293,000 87,847,500 51,864,000 55,037,500 14,597,000 30,416,000 7,892,400 17,198,300 136,530,500 659,804,900 3,625,000 9,242,000 614,000 9,102,000 7,115,100 39,682,100 145,452,500 36,795,900 55,037,500 20,000,000 8,950,000 653,859,700 475,966,200 175,903,300 1,144,116,800 266,623,800 989,475,800 255,699,000 $ 651,869,500 $ 1,410,740,600 $ 1,245,174,800 $ 3,836,900 8,723,600 632,700 5,564,800 33,113,800 111,950,000 188,565,500 91,965,600 56,951,500 30,000,000 19,350,000 69,555,700 620,210,100 126,704,100 $ 746,914.200 0.51 % 1.17% 0.08% 0.75% 4.43% 14.99% 25.25% 12.31 % 7.62% 4.02% 2.59% 9.31 83.04% 16.96% 100.00% Capital Project Highlights 91 Project 1-15 Express Lanes 15/91 Express Lanes Connector -151Limonite interchange Mid County Parkway SR-60 Truck Climbing Lanes Toll Operations 1 FY2016/17 FY2017/18 FY2017/18 Actual Revised Bud • et Pro'ected Sources Local Reimbursements Tolls, Penalties, and Fees Investment Income Transfers In Total Sources Expenses/ Use s Saalariesand Benefits Professional Costs Support and Maintenance Costs Projectsand Operations Capital Outlay Debt Service Transfersout Total Expenses/Uses Excess(deficiency)of revenuesover(under) expenses/usesand otherfinancing sources (uses) Beginning Fund Balance Ending Fund Balance $ - $ 10,125,300 12,100 5,775,000 15,912,400 148,700 99,500 897,600 1,893,900 2,021,200 1,392,200 - $ 1,500,000 16,835,800 42,812,600 162,400 514,600 3,560,000 20,558,200 745,100 1,436,100 4,228,500 7,984,500 650,000 7,119,900 4,052,900 44,827,200 644,600 1,200,200 3,374,300 6,711,200 921,000 7,119,900 709,900 6,453,100 26,217,000 20,681,100 9,459,300 (5,658,800) 9,459,300 24,146,100 9,459,300 $ 9,459,300 $ 3,800,500 $ 33,605,400 FY 2018/ 19 Bud et $ 8,500,000 36,940,500 141,300 45,581,800 603,000 2,061,000 4,576,700 8,786,100 1,340,000 27,119,900 6,307,200 50,793,900 (5,212,100) 33,605,400 $ 28,393,300 la 'IF Function Breakdown FY 2016/ 17 FY 2017/ 18 FY 2017/ 18 Actual Revised Bud • et Pro'ected FY2018/19 Percentage of Bud • et Function Personnel Professional Support Projectsand operations Capital outlay Debt service Total Expenditures/Expenses Tra n sfe rs o u t Total Expenditures/Expenses/Uses $ 8,445,400 23,881,500 5,767,500 421,846,800 5,670,400 138,576,600 604,188,200 210,150,600 $ 814,338,800 $ 9,554,200 22,332,000 11,448,200 639,862,300 6,876,300 666,924,800 1,356,997,800 313,676,500 $ 1,670,674,300 $ 9,446,800 17,630,900 8,871,100 463,926,000 4,611,000 660,979,600 1,165,465,400 298,371,800 $ 1,463,837,200 $ 10,354,700 19,581,200 11,276,900 757,414,800 6,026,200 96,675,600 901,329,400 181,899,300 $ 1,083,228,700 83% 17% 100% Measure A Administrative Costs FY 2018/19 Budget 0 00% o Zy% 0 yo% o ly% 100010 12yo�o 'Oo% 1-0% Close public hearing Authorization and adoption Next Steps • Review the final budget document • Close the public hearing • Approve salary schedule effective 7/5/18 • Authorize use of 91 Express Lanes surplus revenue to fund TIFIA loan reserve • Adopt Resolution 18-004 to increase the Commission's health care premiums contribution • Adopt Proposed FY2018/19 Budget Continue monitorin • Measure A administrative salariesand benefits • Funding needsforprojectsand transit operations • Salestax and TUMF revenue trends • Timelinessof federal and state reimbursements J AGENDA ITEM 8A RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michele Cisneros, Deputy Director of Finance THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2018/19 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to adopt Resolution 18-009, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Establishing the Annual Appropriations Limit", for Fiscal Year 2018/19. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Section 7910 of the California Government Code implements Article XIIIB of the California Constitution by requiring each local jurisdiction to establish, by resolution, its appropriations limit for each fiscal year and to make documentation used to determine the appropriations limit available to the public 15 days prior to adoption of the resolution establishing the appropriations limit. Staff performed the calculations necessary to determine the limit. The resolution and documents supporting the calculation are attached. The Commission chose to use the percentage change in the California per capita personal income and population change within Riverside County as the factors in determining the appropriations limit. As required, the adoption of the Commission's FY 2018/19 Appropriations Limit was posted in the Press Enterprise, and the Desert Sun. Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 18-009 2) California Per Capita Income and Population, Riverside County— California Department of Finance Agenda Item 8A 7 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 18-009 "RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT" WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the California Constitution places an annual limitation upon appropriations from proceeds of taxes by each local government of the State of California; and WHEREAS, in 1988, pursuant to Article XIIIB, section 4 of the California Constitution, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) established its appropriations limit at $75 million for Fiscal Year 1988-1989 under Ordinance No. 88-1; and WHEREAS, Section 7910 of the California Government Code implements Article XIIIB of the California Constitution by requiring each local jurisdiction to establish, by resolution, its appropriations limit for each fiscal year and to make the documentation used in determining the appropriations limit available to the public fifteen days prior to adoption of the resolution establishing the appropriations limit; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Senate Constitutional Amendment No. 1 approved by the voters of the State effective June 6, 1990, beginning with FY 1990-1991 and for each fiscal year thereafter, the Commission's Board of Commissioners (Board) is required to select either the percentage change in California per capita personal income or the percentage change in the local assessment roll due to the addition of local non- residential construction, and either the population change within the Commission or the population change within Riverside County, as the two factors to be applied in calculating the appropriations limit for each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, this Board wishes to select, as factors in determining the Commission's appropriation limit for FY 2018-2019 the percentage change in California per capita personal income and also the population change within Riverside County; and WHEREAS, this Commission has documented its calculations of the Commission's appropriations limit for FY 2018-2019 and said calculations have been made available to the public at least fifteen days prior to the adoption of this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Riverside County Transportation Commission as follows: 1. For FY 2018-2019, the factors selected for calculating the appropriations limit are (a) the percentage change in California per capita personal income, and (b) the population change within the County of Riverside. 8 2. The appropriations limit applicable to this Agency pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution for FY 2018-2019 are hereby established and determined to be $464,186,785. 3. A copy of the documentation used in the determination of the appropriations limit for FY 2018-2019 shall be affixed hereto and shall be available for public inspection. 4. Pursuant to Section 7910 of the California Government Code, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the establishment of the appropriations limit as set forth herein must be commenced within 45 days of the adoption of this resolution. ADOPTED this 13th day of June 2018. Dana W. Reed, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Lisa Mobley, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 9 ATTACHMENT 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2018/ 19 APPROPRIATIONS WAIT 2017/18 Appropriations Limit $ 441,572,195 2018/ 19 adjustment Change in California per capita personal income Per capita cost of living converted to a ratio: Change in population, Riverside County Population converted to a ratio: Calculation of factorfor FY2018/19: 3.67% 1.0367 1.40% 1.0140 Per capita cost of living ratio $ 1.0367 Population ratio 1.0140 FY 2018/ 19 factor 1.0512138 2017/ 18 Appropriations Limit FY2018/19factor $ 441,572,195 1.0512138 2018/ 19 Appropriations Limit $ 464,186,785 Source: California per capita income -California Department of Finance Population, Riverside County -California Department of Finance 10 ATTACHMENT 3 ENT p. A'� ^ ti a " z w MI a O DEPARTMENT OF CqC/FORN�P F N A N C E OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR EDMUND G. BROWN JR. GOVERNOR STATE CAPITOL ■ ROOM 1145 ■ SACRAMENTO CA ■ 95E11 4-4998 ■ WWW.DOF.CA.GOV May 2018 Dear Fiscal Officer: Subject: Price Factor and Population Information Appropriations Limit California Revenue and Taxation Code section 2227 requires the Department of Finance to transmit an estimate of the percentage change in population to local governments. Each local jurisdiction must use their percentage change in population factor for January 1, 2018, in conjunction with a change in the cost of living, or price factor, to calculate their appropriations limit for fiscal year 2018-19. Attachment A provides the change in California's per capita personal income and an example for utilizing the price factor and population percentage change factor to calculate the 2018-19 appropriations limit. Attachment B provides the city and unincorporated county population percentage change. Attachment C provides the population percentage change for counties and their summed incorporated areas. The population percentage change data excludes federal and state institutionalized populations and military populations. Population Percent Change for Special Districts Some special districts must establish an annual appropriations limit. California Revenue and Taxation Code section 2228 provides additional information regarding the appropriations limit. Article XIII B, section 9(C) of the California Constitution exempts certain special districts from the appropriations limit calculation mandate. The code section and the California Constitution can be accessed at the following website: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes.xhtml. Special districts required by law to calculate their appropriations limit must present the calculation as part of their annual audit. Any questions special districts have on this requirement should be directed to their county, district legal counsel, or the law itself. No state agency reviews the local appropriations limits. Population Certification The population certification program applies only to cities and counties. California Revenue and Taxation Code section 11005.6 mandates Finance to automatically certify any population estimate that exceeds the current certified population with the State Controller's Office. Finance will certify the higher estimate to the State Controller by June 1, 2018. Please Note: The prior year's city population estimates may be revised. If you have any questions regarding this data, please contact the Demographic Research Unit at (916) 323-4086. MICHAEL COHEN Director By: AMY M. COSTA Chief Deputy Director Attachment 11 May 2018 Attachment A A. Price Factor: Article XI II B specifies that local jurisdictions select their cost of living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their governing body. The cost of living factor provided here is per capita personal income. If the percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage change to be used in setting the fiscal year 2018-19 appropriation limit is: Per Capita Personal Income Fiscal Year (FY) Percentage change over prior year 2018-19 3.67 B. Following is an example using sample population change and the change in California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 2018-19 appropriation limit. 2018-19: Per Capita Cost of Living Change = 3.67 percent Population Change = 0.78 percent Per Capita Cost of Living converted to a ratio: 3.67 + 100 = 1.0367 100 Population converted to a ratio: 0.78 + 100 = 1.0078 100 Calculation of factor for FY 2018-19: 1.0367 x 1.0078 = 1.0448 12 Fiscal Year 2018-19 County City Riverside Banning Beaumont Blythe Calimesa Canyon Lake Cathedral City Coachella Corona Desert Hot Springs Eastvale Hemet Indian Wells Indio Jurupa Valley Lake Elsinore La Quinta Menifee Moreno Valley Murrieta Norco Palm Desert Palm Springs Perris Rancho Mirage Riverside San Jacinto Temecula Wildomar Unincorporated County Total Attachment B Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusions* January 1, 2017 to January 1, 2018 and Total Population, January 1, 2018 Percent Change 2017-2018 --- Population Minus Exclusions --- 1-1-17 Total Population 1-1-18 1-1-2018 0.36 31,170 31,282 31,282 3.22 46,730 48,237 48,237 2.74 13,203 13,565 19,389 3.61 8,567 8,876 8,876 1.25 10,882 11,018 11,018 0.91 54,249 54,744 54,791 0.80 45,273 45,635 45,635 1.05 166,819 168,574 168,574 1.35 29,347 29,742 29,742 1.78 63,720 64,855 64,855 0.91 82,417 83,166 83,166 0.45 5,549 5,574 5,574 1.44 86,632 87,883 87,883 2.31 103,661 106,054 106,054 1.41 62,342 63,220 63,365 1.48 40,605 41,204 41,204 2.62 89,552 91,902 91,902 1.64 204,285 207,629 207,629 1.56 111,793 113,541 113,541 -0.16 24,221 24,183 26,761 1.37 52,058 52,769 52,769 1.16 47,157 47,706 47,706 0.68 77,311 77,837 77,837 0.86 18,579 18,738 18,738 0.83 323,131 325,801 325,860 1.23 47,560 48,146 48,146 1.02 112,040 113,181 113,181 1.13 35,882 36,287 36,287 1.77 378,897 385,598 385,953 1.40 2,373,632 2,406,947 2,415,955 "Exclusions include residents on federal military installations and group quarters residents in state mental institutions, state and federal correctional institutions and veteran homes. 13 AGENDA ITEM 8B RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michele Cisneros, Deputy Director of Finance THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Sales Tax Analysis STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the sales tax analysis for Quarter 4, 2017 (4Q 2017). BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its December 2017 meeting, the Commission awarded an agreement with MuniServices, LLC (MuniServices), an Avenu Company, for quarterly sales tax reporting services plus additional fees contingent on additional sales tax revenues generated from the transactions and use tax (sales tax) audit services. As part of the recurring contracts process, the Commission approved a five-year extension through June 30, 2018. The services performed under this agreement pertain to only the Measure A sales tax revenues. Since the commencement of these services, MuniServices submitted audits, which reported findings and submitted to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA), as successor to the California State Board of Equalization, for review and determination of errors in sales tax reporting related to 755 businesses. Through 3Q 2017, the CDTFA approved 532 of these accounts for a cumulative sales tax recovery of $8,503,853. Updated amounts for 4Q 2017 will be provided once received from MuniServices. If CDTFA concurs with the error(s) for the remaining claims, the Commission will receive additional revenues; however, the magnitude of the value of the remaining findings was not available. It is important to note that while the recoveries of additional revenues will be tangible, it will not be sufficient to alter the overall trend of sales tax revenues. Additionally, MuniServices provided the Commission with the quarterly sales tax summary report for 4Q 2017. Most of the 4Q 2017 Measure A sales tax revenues were received in the first quarter of calendar year 2018, January 2018 through March 2018, due to a lag in the sales tax calendar. The summary section of the 4Q 2017 report is attached and includes an overview of California's economic outlook, local results, historical cash collections analysis by quarter, top 25 sales/use tax contributors, historical sales tax amounts, annual sales tax by business category, five-year economic trend for significant business category (general retail), final results, and MuniServices' on -going audit results. Agenda Item 8B 14 Taxable transactions for the top 25 contributors in Riverside County generated 23.2 percent of taxable sales for the benchmark year ended 4Q 2017, comparable to the 22.7 percent for the benchmark year ended 4Q 2016. The top 100 tax contributors generated 38.1 percent, slightly higher than the 37.1 percent for the benchmark year ended 4Q 2016. In the Economic Category Analysis below, all six categories experienced new highs in the 4Q 2017 benchmark year compared to the prior seven benchmark years. % of Total / % Change RCTC State Wide ECONOMIC Orange County CATEGORY San Bernardino County ANALYSIS S.F. Bay Area Sacramento Valley Central Valley South Coast North Coast Central Coast General Retail 28.3 / 1.7 27.6 / 1.1 29.0 / 1.3 26.2 / 3.7 25.6 / -0.8 26.7 / 1.4 30.7 / 4.8 28.3 / 0.5 27.4 / -1.3 29.7 / -7.4 Food Products 17.6/4.2 21.1/3.6 20.6/3.8 15.5/4.6 22.4/2.7 17.5/5.2 16.5/4.2 22.6/3.7 18.4/1.5 30.9/-5.7 Transportation 25.3 / 5.1 23.8 / 4.3 23.4 / 3.9 27.2 / 1.5 21.4 / 6.3 28.3 / 6.0 25.9 / 6.2 23.1 / 2.8 30.7 / 6.4 23.8 / 10.5 Construction 10.8 / 8.8 9.7/4.8 9.1/4.7 8.8/-7.8 9.9/5.0 12.5/8.0 12.0/5.8 8.5/5.6 14.3/8.3 8.6/-13.3 Business to Business 15.6/1.6 16.5/3.5 16.9/2.7 20.0/2.5 19.5/0.9 13.7/7.0 13.3/14.6 16.2/2.5 8.1/2.1 6.0/-6.3 Miscellaneous 2.4 / 10.4 1.3/3.3 1.0/1.4 2.2/44.5 1.2/-6.7 1.1/-8.4 1.5/-0.3 1.2/1.5 1.0/-3.4 0.9/-12.3 Total 100.0 / 3.9 100.0/3.1 100.0/2.9 100/2.5 100.0/2.2 100.0/4.8 100.0/6.3 100.0/2.5 100.0/3.1 100.0/-3.7 General Retail: Apparel Stores, Department Stores, Furniture/Appliances, Drug Stores, Recreation Products, Florist/Nursery, and Misc. Retail Food Products: Restaurants, Food Markets, Liquor Stores, and Food Processing Equipment Construction: Building Materials Retail and Building Materials Wholesale Transportation: Auto Parts/Repair, Auto Sales - New, Auto Sales - Used, Service Stations, and Misc. Vehicle Sales Business to Business: Office Equip., Electronic Equip., Business Services, Energy sales, Chemical Products, Heavy Industry, Light Industry, and Leasing Miscellaneous: Health & Government, Miscellaneous Other, and Closed Account Adjustments An analysis of sales tax performance by quarter through 4Q 2017 is attached and illustrates fairly consistent cycles for sales tax performance for most of the economic categories since 4Q 2012. For 8 of the top 10 segments (auto sales -new, restaurants, department stores, miscellaneous retail, building materials -wholesale, apparel stores, food markets, and building materials -retail) during the eight benchmark year quarters, sales tax receipts reached a new high point. The 8 segments represent 61.4 percent of the total sales tax receipts. Service stations representing 7.7 percent was higher than the benchmark year quarter 4Q 2016, but lower for the previous five benchmark year quarters. Light industry representing 4.3 percent was higher than the benchmark year quarter 4Q 2016, but lower for the previous five benchmark year quarters due to completion of renewable energy developments in Riverside County. The top 10 segments represent 73.4 percent of the total sales tax receipts. For the other 19 segments representing 26.6 percent of the total sales tax receipts, 13 segments representing 17.8 percent of the total sales tax receipts reached new high points in the benchmark year 4Q 2017. In the Economic Segment Analysis below, auto sales -new, restaurants, and department stores represent the largest segments for Riverside County, or 32.9 percent of total sales tax receipts. This is the twenty first consecutive quarter since 4Q 2008, that auto sales -new and department stores have been in the top three economic segments. Restaurants replaced service stations in the top three economic segments beginning in 4Q 2014. The service stations segment high occurred in 4Q 2012 and declined through 4Q 2016 due to lower fuel prices; the 4Q 2017 benchmark year for service stations reflects an increase due to rising fuel prices. Agenda Item 8B 15 ECONOMIC SEGMENT ANALYSIS RCTC State Wide Orange County San Bernardino County S.F. Bay Area Sacramento Valley Central Valley South Coast North Coast Central Coast Largest Segment Auto Sales - New Restaurants Restaurants Restaurants Restaurants Auto Sales - New Department Stores Restaurants Auto Sales - New Restaurants %ofTotal /%Change 11.5/4.0 15.0/4.0 15.1/4.6 10.3/4.7 15.9/2.6 12.3/3.3 12.9/3.1 16.6/4.4 12.1/5.3 21.8/-6.7 2nd Largest Segment Restaurants Auto Sales - New Auto Sales - New Department Stores Auto Sales - New Restaurants Auto Sales - New Auto Sales - New Service Stations Auto Sales - New %ofTotal /%Change 11.5 / 4.1 11.1/2.7 11.8/3.2 10.1/4.9 11.1/5.6 11.6/5.3 10.7/5.9 11.0/0.6 11.0/13.6 11.6/20.9 3rd Largest Segment Department Stores Department Stores Department Stores Auto Sales- New Department Stores Department Stores Restaurants Department Stores Restaurants Misc. Retail %ofTotal /%Change 9.9 / 2.1 9.1/2.4 8.8/0.6 9.8/2.2 7.4/1.6 10.5/3.7 10.7/4.2 8.8/1.6 10.7/2.1 10.0/-6.1 During the review of the 4Q 2017 detailed report with MuniServices, information regarding sales tax comparison by city and change in economic segments (two highest and two highest losses) from 4Q 2017 to 4Q 2016 was provided and is attached. Staff continues to monitor monthly sales tax receipts and other available economic data to determine the need for any adjustments to the revenue projections. Staff will utilize the forecast scenarios included with the complete report and receipt trends in assessing such projections. Attachments: 1) Sales Tax Digest Summary 4Q 2017 2) Sales Tax Performance by Quarter 4Q 2017 3) Quarterly Sales Tax Change Comparison by City for 4Q 2017 to 4Q 2016 Agenda Item 8B 16 ATTACHMENT 1 Riverside County Transportation Commission Sales Tax Digest Summary Collections through March 2018 Sales through December 2017 (2017Q4) CALIFORNIA'S ECONOMIC OUTLOOK California sales tax receipts increased by 3.7% over the same quarter from the previous year, with Northern California reporting a 4.3% increase compared to 1.9% for Southern California. Receipts for the RCTC changed by 3.8% over the same periods. • Real gross domestic product (GDP) increased at an annual rate of 2.9% in the fourth quarter of 2017, according to the "third" estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. In the third quarter, real GDP increased 3.2%. (BEA) • Holiday 2017 Retail Sales Between November 1 and December 24: Up 4.9% for 2017, setting a record for dollars spent. This is the largest year -over -year increase since 2011. Online shopping also saw large gains of 18.1% compared to 2016. (Mastercard) • Unemployment (California and the US): Rate fell to 4.3% in December. The U.S. rate held at 4.1% in December and remained 4.1% in January 2018. • Retail Sales and Use Tax for January: $43 million below the month's forecast of $2.790 billion - a decrease of 1.5%. January receipts includes the final payment for fourth quarter sales, which was due on January 31. Year-to-date sales tax revenues are $35 million below forecast. (DOF) LOCAL RESULTS Net Cash Receipts Analysis Local Collections Share of County Pool 0.0% Share of State Pool 0.0% SBE Net Collections Less: Amount Due County 0.0% Less: Cost of Administration Net 4Q2017 Receipts Net 4Q2016 Receipts Actual Percentage Change $48,398,700 0 0 48,398,700 .00 (506,280) 47,892,420 46,147, 211 3.8 % Business Activity Performance Analysis Local Collections Less: Payments for Prior Periods Preliminary 4Q2017 Collections Projected 4Q2017 Late Payments Projected 4Q2017 Final Results Actual 4Q2016 Results Projected Percentage Change $48,398,700 (1,964,219) 46,434,481 1,528,525 47,963,006 46,329,761 3.5% www.avenuinsights.com (800) 800-8181 Page 1 17 RCTC HISTORICAL CASH COLLECTIONS ANALYSIS BY QUARTER $50,000 548,000 $46,000 .01 i+ a 0.3 °; $44,000 m re .. m Z Suva) (in thousands of $) $540 $530 $520 $510 $5oo $490 $36,000 ' $480 3Q2015 4Q2015 1Q2016 2Q2016 3Q2016 4Q2016 1Q2017 2Q2017 3Q2017 4Q2017 Net Receipts t5130E Admin Fees Due fA m m LL C E a TOP 25 SALES/USE TAX CONTRIBUTORS The following list identifies RCTC's Top 25 Sales/Use Tax contributors. The list is in alphabetical order and represents sales from January 2017 to December 2017. The Top 25 Sales/Use Tax contributors generate 20.5% of RCTC's total sales and use tax revenue. 7-ELEVEN FOOD STORES AMAZON.COM ARCO AM/PM MINI MARTS BEST BUY STORES CARMAX THE AUTO SUPERSTORE CHEVRON SERVICE STATIONS CIRCLE K FOOD STORES COSTCO WHOLESALE DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICLES HOME DEPOT JACK IN THE BOX KOHL'S LOWE'S HOME CENTERS MACY'S DEPARTMENT STORE MCDONALD'S RALPH'S GROCERY COMPANY ROSS STORES SAM'S CLUB SHELL SERVICE STATIONS STATER BROS MARKETS TARGET STORES UNION 76 SERVICE STATIONS USA SERVICE STATIONS VERIZON WIRELESS WAL MART STORES www.avenuinsights.com (800) 800-8181 18 Page 2 RCTC HISTORICAL SALES TAX AMOUNTS The following chart shows the sales tax level from sales through December 2017, the highs, and the lows for each segment over the last two years. (In thousands of $) ■ 40,2017 ■ High • Low $25,000 - $20,000 - $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 i ` 4,N% t*. a' VI) 5 ANNUAL SALES TAX BY BUSINESS CATEGORY 4QZ017 3011017 2=17 1QZ017 4=316 3Q2016 2Q2016 10, 016 4Q2.015 3QZ015 50,750 50,579 316.6 31,119 50,245 30,683 50.013 a9,411 48,410 48,162 47.785 30,366 Z9.9(13 29.507 29,174 28,721 (In thousands of$) 45,352 44,970 44,416 1 i 1 e blot 40)4i 19,232 28,011 18,842 27,633 18,383 27,714 43,945 17.809 27,556 43,349 43.410 17,683 27,417 1/,6I6 1I,348 t_. 26.680 26,140 17,149 25.897 28,280 43,305 16,801 25.848 $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 5140,000 $160,000 $180,000 5200,000 ■ General Retail ■ rood Products ■ Transportation ■ Construction ■ Business To Business ■ Miscellaneous www.avenuinsights.com (800) 800-8181 19 Page 3 RCTC FIVE-YEAR ECONOMIC TREND: General Retail $16,000 $14,000 S12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 (in thousands of $) $0 N :1 M M Ch 3" 3 3 n n N N n b n n n n n A 1� rl rl et rl rl rl rl rl rl ed ed rl rl ed a -I a -I ed rl ed rl rl a N N KF a N N NI 1 rl N KF a a-1 N i'h a ri N IrF 1 FINAL RESULTS: January 2017 - December 2017 Sales Local Net Cash Collections Less: Pool Amounts Less: Prior Quarter Payments Add: Late Payments Local Net Economic Collections after Adjustments Percent Change from January 2016 — December 2016 Sales MUNISERVICES' ON -GOING AUDIT RESULTS This Quarter $293,993 Total to Date $8,503,853 $43,469,380 ($-506,280) ($2,147,424) $1, 685, 049 $43,513,285 UP BY 3.4% www.avenuinsights.com (800) 800-8181 20 Page 4 RCTC: Sales Tax Performance Analysis by Quarter ATTACHMENT 2 TOTAL TOTAL $60,000,000 $50, 000, 000 $40, 000, 000 $30, 000, 000 $20, 000, 000 $10,000,000 $o a 0- 0- 0- 0- Cr 0- a 0- 0- 0- a by N., ^r ^rt. ^rt. by tih ^r ^r y y Q1 Economic CATEGORY TOTAL $16,000,000 2017Q4 QoQ %4 QoQ $A YoY %A YoY $A $47,962,686 3.5% $1,633,862 3.9% $6,718,725 $14, 000, 000 GENERAL RETAIL 2017Q4 QoQ%4 QoQ $A YoY %A YoY $A 15 086 174 0.6% $88,243 1.7% $824,190 $12,000,000 ° of 2017Q4 Total: 31.5% FOOD PRODUCTS $10,000,000 2017Q4 QoQ %A QoQ $A YoY %A YoY $A $8,049,987 3.2% $252,631 4.2% $1,288,356 % of Total: 16.8% $8, 000, 000 'TRANSPORTATION $11,360,733 2017Q4 QoQ %A QoQ $A YoY %A YoY $A $6,000,000 4.0% $438,395 5.1% $2,207,788 % of Total: 23.7% $4,000,000 CONSTRUCTION 2017Q4 Q0Q %A QoQ $A YoY %A YoY $A $4,864,678 8.8% $394,031 8.8% $1,563,199 $2,000,000 %of Total: 10.1% $o BUSINESS TO BUSINESS 2017Q4 Q0Q %A QoQ $A YoY %A YoY $A $7,457,518 5.1% $359,019 1.6% $432,121 % of Total: 15.5% QoQ = 17Q4 / 16Q4 YoY = YE 17Q4 / YE 16Q4 21 Quarterly Comparison of 2016Q4 and 2017Q4 ( October thru December Sales ) ATTACHMENT 3 General Retail c a m Oct - Dec 2017 (2017Q4) Oct - Dec 2016 (2016Q4) % Chg Gain Gain Decline Decline RIVERSIDE COUNTY _ BANNING 20.9% 3.1% 21.9% 30.7% -4.2% 25.3% 633,267 543,705 16.5% Auto Sales - New Service Stations Heavy Industry Recreation Products BEAUMONT -2.4% 1.0% 9.8% 2.8% -7.5% 27.0% 1,143,496 1,136,594 0.6% Leasing Service Stations Light Industry Heavy Industry BLYTHE -10.5% -0.4% 5.8% -2.5% 146.5% -6.7% 421,410 369,946 13.9% Light Industry Auto Sales - New Department Stores Restaurants CALIMESA -14.0% -47.2% -40.5% -53.2% -53.8% -78.7% 189,783 330,963 -42.7% Miscellaneous Retail Misc. Vehicle Sales Service Stations Restaurants CANYON LAKE -26.3% 23.4% -28.8% -17.7% -10.5% -13.4% 52,076 54,763 -4.9% Restaurants Food Markets Auto Sales - Used Misc. Vehicle Sales CATHEDRAL CITY 6.1% 4.6% 2.5% 1.5% 5.5% -43.9% 2,078,704 2,015,471 3.1% Auto Sales - New Service Stations Miscellaneous Other Auto Parts/Repair COACHELLA 6.7% 6.4% -6.8% -4.8% 21.6% 294.3% 779,473 763,258 2.1% Closed Acct-Adjustmt Energy Sales Service Stations Auto Sales - Used CORONA 0.3% 4.4% 13.3% 9.4% -5.6% 1868.1% 9,956,230 9,077,704 9.7% Miscellaneous Other BIdg.Matls-Whsle Business Services Office Equipment DESERT HOT SPRINGS -0.6% 3.2% 15.5% 17.0% -16.8% 58.0% 339,853 316,163 7.5% Service Stations Restaurants Department Stores Light Industry EASTVALE -2.9% 0.9% 14.8% -8.7% 20.69' 11.2% 1,897,494 1,831,552 3.6% Business Services Heavy Industry BIdg.Matls-Whsle Miscellaneous Retail HEMET -3.0% 0.4% 2.3% 2.9% 9.2% 15.5% 2,639,681 2,611,893 1.1% Auto Sales - New Service Stations Auto Parts/Repair Energy Sales INDIAN WELLS -23.3% -4.7% -100.0% 301.0% 12.5% -68.4% 226,820 244,151 -7.1% Business Services Food Markets Restaurants Miscellaneous Retail INDIO -19.6% -15.7% 6.0% -7.5% 18.9% -41.4% 2,538,687 2,693,354 -5.7% Auto Sales - New Light Industry Department Stores Restaurants JURUPA VALLEY 16.9% 1.9% 11.7% 9.1% 2.49' -37.6% 2,543,919 2,362,489 7.7% Service Stations Miscellaneous Retail Misc. Vehicle Sales Department Stores LA QUINTA 10.1% 5.4% 6.6% -3.6% -8.9% 37.1% 2,225,194 2,090,710 6.4% Department Stores Restaurants BIdg.Matls-Retail Leasing LAKE ELSINORE 2.3% 6.7% -1.9% -16.4% 34.3% -54.1% 2,230,656 2,209,958 0.9% Department Stores Food Markets Auto Sales- New BIdg.Matls-Whsle MENIFEE 3.7% 9.1% 5.5% 6.5% 14.7% 35.2% 1,841,507 1,725,270 6.7% Food Markets BIdg.Matls-Retail BIdg.Matls-Whsle Business Services MORENO VALLEY 4.7% 4.9% 6.8% 8.2% -4.5% 19.7% 4,599,935 4,384,217 4.9% Service Stations Department Stores Chemical Products Light Industry MURRIETA -0.7% -0.3% 37.3% 11.3% 8.3% 39.7% 3,970,203 3,583,723 10.8% Auto Sales - Used Light Industry Leasing Recreation Products NORCO 2.2% 5.1% 3.1% -2.3% -15.8% 25.9% 1,525,324 1,498,304 1.8% Service Stations Furniture/Appliance Light Industry Auto Sales - New PALM DESERT 0.1% 5.1% -3.0% 10.9% -8.7% 18.2% 4,774,719 4,702,180 1.5% Restaurants BIdg.Matls-Whsle Auto Sales- New Leasing PALM SPRINGS -0.4% 8.6% 0.6% 4.9% 5.5% -4.7% 3,009,757 2,896,114 3.9% Restaurants Service Stations Auto Sales - New Miscellaneous Retail PERRIS 63.7% 21.2% 18.4% -0.3% 5.3% 1.9% 3,995,080 3,155,717 26.6% Furniture/Appliance Service Stations Electronic Equipment Apparel Stores RANCHO MIRAGE 1.1% 7.8% -5.2% -9.7% 26.3% -14.3% 1,282,537 1,253,411 2.3% Restaurants Business Services Auto Sales- New BIdg.Matls-Retail RIVERSIDE -6.4% 0.8% -1.1% 21.7% 5.4% -5.7% 14,446,276 14,331,144 0.8%BIdg.Matls-Whsle Service Stations Auto Sales - New Department Stores SAN JACINTO -2.4% 8.1% 17.8% 6.4% 41.0% -15.1% 689,841 646,772 6.7% Service Stations Food Markets Department Stores Florist/Nursery TEMECULA -1.7% 2.8% 3.3% 11.7% 1.9% -23.2% 8,640,298 8,489,212 1.8% Light Industry Auto Sales - New Office Equipment Recreation Products WILDOMAR 0.9% 7.0% 5.3% 1.1% -30.2% -3.9% 391,248 379,416 3.1% Service Stations Food Markets Office Equipment Misc. Vehicle Sales RIVERSIDE COUNTY 2.4% 1.3% 3.3% 7.7% 27.7% 6.2% 7,075,474 6,725,807 5.2% Service Stations BIdg.Matls-Whsle Auto Parts/Repair Recreation Products Non -Confidential MuniServices 22 AGENDA ITEM 8C RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Megan Kavand, Senior Financial Analyst Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Investment Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2018. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Prior to Fiscal Year 2013/14, the Commission's quarterly investment reports reflected investments primarily concentrated in the Riverside County Pooled Investment Fund (RCPIF). Other investments included the state Local Agency Investment Fund and mutual funds. As a result of significant project financings such as the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (91 Project or 91 CIP) and the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project (1-15 ELP), the Commission determined it would be prudent to engage an investment manager for the bond proceeds and other required funds. Additionally, the Commission desired to engage an investment manager to provide investment advisory and management services related to the Commission's operating funds. In May 2013, following a competitive procurement, the Commission awarded two investment management services agreements to Logan Circle Partners, L.P. (Logan) for the 91 Project's proceeds generated from the issuance of sales tax revenue bonds and toll revenue bonds and to Payden & Rygel Investment Management (Payden & Rygel) for Commission operating funds. At its April 2017 meeting and based on a competitive procurement, the Commission awarded an investment management services agreement to Logan related to the issuance of the sales tax revenue bonds for the 1-15 ELP. Commencing in July 2013, Logan invested the 91 Project debt proceeds and subsequent 91 Project equity contributions in separate accounts of the Short -Term Actively Managed Program (STAMP). Consistent with financing expectations, the Commission expended substantially all of the 91 Project debt proceeds and equity contributions, except for the toll revenue bonds debt service reserve and the sales tax revenue bonds capitalized interest funds. The Commission authorized Payden & Rygel to make specific investments for the Commission's operating funds beginning with the third quarter of FY 2014/15. Agenda Item 8C 23 In July 2017, the 1-15 ELP project and 91 Project completion financing (2017 Financing) was completed and sales tax bond proceeds approximating $154.6 million were received. Logan invested the 2017 Financing debt proceeds in accounts of a separate STAMP portfolio during the first quarter of FY 2017/18. The quarterly investment report for the third quarter of FY 2017/18, as required by state law and Commission policy, reflects the investment activities resulting from the 91 Project, 2017 Financing, and available operating cash. The quarterly investment report includes the following information: • Investment Portfolio Report; • 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category; • 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio by Account; • 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account; • 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio Summary of investments by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type, and market sector; • 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Series A & Series B Reserve Fund Summary of investments by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type, and market sector; • 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio Residual Fund Required Retained Balance Summary of investments by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type, and market sector; • 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category; • 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio by Account; • 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account; • 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Summary of investments by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type, and market sector; • 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Sales Tax Revenue Fund Summary of investment by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type, and market sector; • 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio 1-15 ELP Sales Tax Senior Lien TIFIA Project Fund Summary of investment by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type, and market sector; • 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Ramp Up Fund Summary of investment by credit rating, industry group, asset class, security type, and market sector; • Logan Circle Partners, L.P. Short Duration First Quarter 2018 Review; • Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio by Investment Category; • Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Transaction Report; • Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio First Quarter 2018 Review; and • County of Riverside Investment Report for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2018. The Commission's investments were in full compliance with the Commission's investment policy adopted on December 13, 2017, and investments securities permitted under the indenture for the Commission's sales tax revenue bonds and the master indenture for the Commission's toll revenue bonds. Additionally, the Commission has adequate cash flows for the next six months. Agenda Item 8C 24 Attachments: 1) Investment Portfolio Report 2) 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category 3) 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio by Account 4) 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account 5) 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio Summary of Investments 6) 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio Toll Revenue Series A & Series B Reserve Fund Summary of Investments 7) 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio Residual Fund Required Retained Balance Summary of investments 8) 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category 9) 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio by Account 10) 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account 11) 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Summary of Investments 12) 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Sales Tax Revenue Fund Summary of Investments 13) 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio 1-15 ELP Sales Tax Senior Lien TIFIA Project Fund Summary of Investments 14) 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Ramp Up Fund Summary of Investments 15) Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio by Investment Category 16) Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Transaction Report 17) Logan Circle Partners, L.P. Short Duration Quarterly Review 18) Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Quarterly Review 19) County of Riverside Investment Report Agenda Item 8C 25 ATTACHMENT 1 Riverside County Transportation Commission Investment Portfolio Report Period Ended: March 31, 2018 RATING COUPON PAR PURCHASE MATURITY YIELD TO PURCHASE MARKET UNREALIZED FAIR VALUE MOODYS / S&P RATE VALUE DATE DATE MATURITY COST VALUE GAIN (LOSS) OPERATING FUNDS City National Bank Deposits 16,121,938 A3/BBB+ N/A N/A County Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund 426,041,173 Aaa-bf/AAA-V1 N/A 1.55% Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 3,702,595 N/A N/A N/A Subtotal Operating Funds 445,865,707 FUNDS HELD IN TRUST County Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund: Local Transportation Fund 82,765,542 Aaa-bf/AAA-V1 N/A 1.55% Subtotal Funds Held in Trust 82,765,542 COMMISSION MANAGED PORTFOLIO US Bank Payden & Rygel Operating 50,839,673 See attached report for details First American Government Obligation Fund 53,324,597 N/A N/A N/A Subtotal Commission Managed Portfolio 104,164,269 STAMP PORTFOLIO for 91 CIP Series A & Series B Reserve Fund Sales Tax Revenue Capitalized Interest Fund Residual Fund Required Retained Balance Subtotal STAMP Portfolio - 91 CIP STAMP PORTFOLIO for 2017 Financing Sales Tax 115 ELP Project Revenue Fund Sales Tax Revenue Fund Ramp Up Fund Subtotal STAMP Portfolio - 2017 Financing 17,732,101 792,838 3,278,697 21,803,636 83,948,586 25,416,178 7,820,608 117,185,372 TOTAL All Cash and Investments E 771,784,527 $500,000,000 $450,000,000 $400,000,000 $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 $- 2.29% 13.50 10.88 % 10.72 % 57.77% Nature of Investments ■ STAMP Portfolio for 91 CIP Reserve ■ STAMP Portfolio for 91 CIP Capitalized Interest ■ STAMP Portfolio for 91 CIP Residual Fund ■ STAMP Portfolio for 2017 Financing 115 ELP Project Revenue Fund ■ STAMP Portfolio for 2017 Financing Revenue Fund ■ STAMP Portfolio for 2017 Financing Ramp Up Fund ■ Commission Managed Portfolio ■ Trust Funds ■ Operating Funds See attached report for details See attached report for details See attached report for details See attached report for details See attached report for details See attached report for details 0.121 Money Market Funds 24.38% Fixed Income 0.48% LAIF 6.91% Mutual Funds 68.01% County Pool/Cash 26 ATTACHMENT 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category for quarter ended March 31, 2018 Account Identifier Security Type Category Issuer Final Maturity Trade Date Current Face Value Original Cost Next Call Date Base Market Value Base Net Total Unrealized Gain/Loss Coupon Summarized Yield Credit Rating 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3I37EADB2 Agency Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 01/13/2022 -- 950,000.00 942,921.50 --- 943,245.50 (6,414.89) 2.375 2.573 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3135GOD75 Agency Federal National Mortgage Association 06/22/2020 05/06/2015 600,000.00 593,490.00 --- 588,390.00 (8,712.27) 1.500 2.397 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3I37EADR7 Agency Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 05/01/2020 05/15/2015 475,000.00 471,527.75 --- 465,742.25 (7,766.18) 1.375 2.337 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 313385VL7 Agency FHLBanks Office of Finance 04/12/2018 03/29/2018 100,000.00 99,933.50 --- 99,954.00 6.25 0.000 1.292 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3I36A72D3 Agency CMO Federal National Mortgage Association 04/25/2022 07/03/2013 358,757.85 340,819.96 -- 353,545.10 2,508.87 2.482 2.974 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137AUPE3 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 06/25/2022 --- 379,000.00 366,344.03 --- 371,988.50 (935.39) 2.396 2.849 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38377RSZ9 Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 06/16/2039 -- 95,157.39 98,144.26 -- 97,394.54 (198.38) 4.500 2.273 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 31395EZP5 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 08/15/2019 07/09/2013 14,244.42 15,070.15 --- 14,368.48 (60.55) 4.500 2.156 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38377JZ89 Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 10/20/2039 07/05/2013 64,550.98 66,525.33 -- 65,234.57 (571.34) 3.500 2.886 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38376GB33 Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 10/16/2044 01/23/2015 174,842.41 179,469.67 --- 175,129.15 (953.01) 3.500 2.969 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38376T5Z1 Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 01/16/2039 01/26/2015 96,706.36 101,033.97 -- 96,653.17 (3,351.34) 3.000 2.993 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378TAF7 Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 07/20/2041 07/05/2013 151,768.55 151,791.43 --- 150,176.49 (1,464.02) 2.500 2.825 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38380AZ34 Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 04/20/2046 11/28/2016 159,204.10 163,663.06 -- 158,041.91 (5,184.06) 3.000 3.123 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378CRT6 Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 10/20/2040 05/22/2014 61,917.97 59,789.54 --- 59,761.37 (186.90) 2.000 3.227 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38376WA62 Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 10/20/2039 -- 96,355.10 100,307.76 -- 100,609.17 (490.63) 4.000 2.368 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38377RVK8 Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 04/20/2039 --- 111,233.66 114,370.79 --- 111,288.16 (1,943.16) 3.000 2.931 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3I37ASNH3 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 09/25/2021 07/03/2013 210,041.80 205,258.42 -- 206,177.03 (1,814.99) 1.459 2.606 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137AXHP1 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation _ 09/25/2022 09/29/2017 140,000.00 _ 142,089.06 --- 138,119.80 (3,743.65) _2.573 2.875 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3I37AJMF8 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 10/25/2021 08/05/2015 30,000.00 31,038.28 -- 30,131.70 (438.53) 2.968 2.784 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137ATRW4 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 05/25/2022 12/21/2016 125,000.00 124,804.69 --- 122,681.25 (2,118.79) 2.373 2.837 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378B7F0 Agency CMO Government National Mortgage Association 12/16/2042 -- 450,000.00 427,324.22 -- 424,314.00 (10,436.24) 2.273 3.523 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137A5FP4 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 01/15/2021 --- 137,077.58 137,093.08 --- 136,945.98 (134.06) 2.500 2.512 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378CDK0 Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 03/20/2035 03/16/2018 37,091.96 37,265.83 -- 37,268.89 (0.83) 3.000 2.401 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38377LQT8 Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 12/20/2037 03/08/2018 13,655.47 13,655.47 --- 13,680.59 25.28 3.000 2.458 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 3I37A1LC5 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 08/15/2020 01/17/2018 27,212.25 27,122.96 -- 27,109.11 (15.03) 2.000 2.395 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 3137A5FP4 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 01/15/2021 01/30/2018 49,002.55 49,125.05 --- 48,955.51 (163.61) 2.500 2.512 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 38378CDK0 Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 03/20/2035 01/30/2018 66,765.54 67,381.02 -- 67,084.01 (248.99) 3.000 2.401 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 38378AWX5 Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 01/20/2036 01/30/2018 _ 43,761.85 44,185.79 43,971.47 (194.45) _3.000 2.524 AAA 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 36290WH47 Agency MBS Government National Mortgage Association 09/15/2018 07/18/2013 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 (0.00) 4.500 2.066 AAA 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 31401MWC1 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 06/01/2018 07/12/2013 0.00 0.00 --- 0.00 (0.00) 4.500 -3.625 AAA 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 3I28MBTH0 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 03/01/2019 07/26/2013 0.01 0.01 -- 0.01 (0.00) 5.000 -1.675 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38379KDN5 Agency MBS Government National Mortgage Association 09/16/2055 08/05/2015 168,839.03 164,525.71 --- 159,590.03 (6,816.39) _2.112 3.701 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 36202F2H8 Agency MBS Ginnie Mae11 01/20/2027 11/14/2016 175,385.29 182,017.05 -- 176,483.20 (5,163.97) 3.000 2.766 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378XP62 Agency MBS The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 05/16/2055 05/14/2015 328,790.11 332,848.61 --- 314,757.34 (17,429.56) 2.500 3.486 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3I381PEB0 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 11/01/2020 09/26/2014 254,516.25 267,997.66 -- 258,272.91 (1,982.14) 3.370 2.847 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378KWU9 Agency MBS The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 11/16/2041 --- 73,766.34 72,034.11 --- 69,602.23 (3,188.10) 1.400 4.151 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3I38E.IPZ5 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 07/01/2022 08/29/2016 278,000.62 295,277.92 -- 277,405.70 (13,875.73) 2.973 3.015 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 31381T4E7 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 03/01/2022 10/25/2016 266,308.66 278,240.54 --- 264,380.58 (10,635.16) 2.670 3.084 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3I36A4M48 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 01/25/2022 07/05/2013 235,782.50 236,445.64 -- 232,505.12 (3,671.88) 2.098 4.398 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3136A7MN9 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 05/25/2022 08/29/2016 300,000.00 308,578.13 --- 293,502.00 (12,308.41) 2.349 3.073 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3I4I7YKF3 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 0I/01/2030 07/10/2013 82,268.04 86,792.79 -- 86,439.86 (191.45) 4.500 2.972 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378KRSO Agency MBS The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 07/16/2043 05/08/2015 450,000.00 434,460.94 --- 422,793.00 (16,858.18) 2.389 3.731 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378KXW4 Agency MBS The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 02/16/2037 12/11/2014 177,510.56 176,650.75 -- 172,659.20 (4,425.42) 1.705 3.335 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3138EKXL4 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 03/01/2023 --- 293,119.60 289,390.18 --- 286,832.18 (2,952.81) _2.356 2.952 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3I38L33G8 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 06/01/2020 11/12/2015 100,000.00 99,875.00 -- 98,455.00 (1,380.79) 2.010 2.675 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378KSL4 Agency MBS The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 12/16/2046 --- 425,000.00 415,829.11 --- 392,615.00 (25,388.18) 2.811 3.942 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3I38L76A9 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 11/01/2021 10/04/2016 124,240.90 128,725.23 -- 123,388.61 (3,651.07) 2.590 2.856 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3136AHAEO Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 04/25/2023 10/28/2016 195,981.53 200,207.38 --- 192,518.53 (6,816.99) 2.522 3.445 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378B6A2 Agency MBS Government National Mortgage Association 11/16/2052 01/22/2015 117,501.25 113,797.20 -- 112,029.21 (3,146.92) 1.826 3.395 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137B1U75 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 01/25/2023 08/29/2016 380,000.00 394,917.97 --- 373,961.80 (16,818.18) 2.522 2.901 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3I381Q6B7 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 06/01/2021 07/15/2016 186,228.65 206,539.21 -- 193,806.29 (5,790.20) 4.295 2.849 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3136AC7J4 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 03/25/2023 02/21/2018 74,236.49 73,015.65 --- 73,139.27 100.93 2.493 3.069 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 3I4I6BVR6 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 12/01/2020 01/17/2018 73,982.63 75,647.23 -- 75,512.59 (50.51) 5.000 2.432 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 3137AXHN6 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 02/25/2022 01/25/2018 38,452.77 37,924.05 --- 37,739.47 (193.28) 1.749 2.670 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 3I37B1UF7 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 09/25/2022 01/25/2018 21,363.22 21,049.45 -- 20,942.15 (111.94) 1.785 2.676 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 31294KUP8 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation _ 11/01/2018 02/01/2018 8,213.04 8,295.17 --- 8,330.57 44.83 5.000 -0.702 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 3I36AC7J4 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 03/25/2023 02/21/2018 20,621.24 20,282.12 -- 20,316.46 28.03 2.493 3.069 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 3137AWQG3 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 04/25/2022 01/30/2018 44,510.16 43,571.27 --- 43,559.87 (41.32) 1.583 2.598 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 58769DAD2 Asset Backed Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2017-A 03/16/2020 -- 52,000.00 51,710.12 -- 51,654.20 (99.07) 1.790 2.556 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 02582JGN4 Asset Backed American Express Credit Account Master Trust 05/15/2019 01/16/2018 100,000.00 100,351.56 --- 100,274.00 (49.89) 2.147 2.014 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 89236WAD0 Asset Backed Toyota Auto Receivables 2015-A Owner Trust 06/15/2020 01/19/2018 50,000.00 49,865.23 -- 49,815.50 (91.87) 1.520 2.429 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 161571FK5 Asset Backed Chase Issuance Trust 08/15/2019 01/25/2018 115,000.00 113,827.54 --- 113,403.80 (553.45) 1.580 2.623 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 65479AAD4 Asset Backed Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2017-A 04/15/2020 01/25/2018 50,000.00 49,771.48 -- 49,545.50 (255.06) 1.910 2.711 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 055657AC4 Asset Backed Bmw Vehicle Lease Trust 2017-1 05/20/2020 01/29/2018 100,000.00 99,703.13 --- 99,361.00 (389.14) 1.980 2.712 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 149I2L6M8 Corporate Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation 11/13/2018 01/19/2018 100,000.00 99,809.00 -- 99,639.00 (214.98) 1.800 2.389 A 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 13607RAB6 Corporate Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce 09/06/2019 01/19/2018 100,000.00 98,888.00 --- 98,325.00 (692.38) 1.600 2.800 A 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 891 I4QBF4 Corporate Toronto Dominion Bank 01/22/2019 01/19/2018 50,000.00 50,366.50 -- 50,277.50 (20.53) 2.585 2.460 AA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 38141EA58 Corporate The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 03/15/2020 01/25/2018 100,000.00 _ 105,718.00 --- 104,270.00 (994.48) 5.375_ 3.110 A 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 037833BD1 Corporate Apple Inc. 05/06/2020 01/25/2018 100,000.00 99,354.00 -- 98,740.00 (662.66) 2.000 2.620 AA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 06406HCU1 Corporate The Bank of New York Mellon 05/15/2019 01/25/2018 100,000.00 99,974.00 04/15/2019 99,612.00 (366.09) 2.200 2.551 A 27 Page 2 of 32 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category for quarter ended March 31, 2018 Account Identifier Security Type Category Issuer ma Maturity Trade Date Current Face Value Base Market Value Base Net Total Unrealized Gain/Loss Coupon Yield Summarized Credit Rating Original Cost Ne: a Date 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 86787EAS6 Corporate SunTrust Bank 01/31/2020 01/25/2018 100,000.00 100,644.00 12/31/2019 100,619.00 31.96 2.302 2.476 A A 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 0258MODZ9 Corporate American Express Credit Corporation 11/05/2018 01/25/2018 100,000.00 99,905.00 10/05/2018 99,587.00 (339.72) 1.875 2.575 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 46625HKA7 Corporate JPMorgan Chase & Co. 01/23/2020 01/25/2018 100,000.00 99,577.00 12/23/2019 98,785.00 (827.91) 2.250 2.942 A 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 9115911HE3 Corporate U.S. Bancorp 11/15/2018 01/25/2018 100,000.00 100,035.00 10/15/2018 99,699.00 (327.73) 1.950 2.436 A 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 780082AC7 Corporate Royal Bank of Canada 10/14/2020 01/25/2018 100,000.00 98,862.00 -- 98,248.00 (685.34) 2.100 2.820 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 24422ESF7 Corporate John Deere Capital Corporation 12/13/2018 01/25/2018 100,000.00 99,980.00 --- 99,729.00 (255.14) 1.950 2.339 A 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 06051GFN4 Corporate Bank of America Corporation 04/21/2020 01/25/2018 100,000.00 99,537.00 -- 98,545.00 (1,028.09) 2.250 2.984 A 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 06416CAC2 Corporate The Bank of Nova Scotia 04/26/2021 01/29/2018 100,000.00 97,511.00 --- 96,954.00 (681.15) 1.875 2.919 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 6I747WAF6 Corporate Morgan Stanley 01/25/2021 01/29/2018 100,000.00 108,369.00 -- 106,572.00 (1,348.35) 5.750 3.288 A 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 136069XZ9 Corporate Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce 02/02/2021 01/26/2018 45,000.00 _ 45,000.00 --- 45,028.80 _ 28.80 2.093 2.596 A 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 05531FAQ6 Corporate BB&T Corporation 02/01/2019 01/25/2018 100,000.00 100,106.00 01/02/2019 99,553.00 (533.73) 2.250 2.793 A 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 254010AC5 Corporate Dignity Health 11/01/2019 03/15/2018 24,000.00 _ 23,897.52 --- 23,897.76 (2.06) 2.637 2.913 A 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interest 9AMMF05B2 MM Fund U.S. Bank Money Market Account Fund 03/31/2018 -- 0.00 792,837.56 -- 792,837.56 0.00 0.200 0.000 -- 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 9AMMF05B2 MM Fund U.S. Bank Money Market Account Fund 03/31/2018 --- 0.00 171,587.89 --- 171,587.89 0.00 0.200 0.000 --- 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 9AMMF05B2 MM Fund U.S. Bank Money Market Account Fund 03/31/2018 03/28/2018 0.00 13,733.06 -- 13,733.06 0.00 0.200 0.000 NA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828V49 TIPS Treasury, United States Department of 01/15/2027 --- 287,260.40 285,917.55 --- 279,955.37 (6,082.49) 0.375 0.673 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 9I2828SA9 TIPS Treasury, United States Department of 01/15/2022 -- 454,400.10 456,702.75 -- 449,569.83 (6,791.34) 0.125 0.408 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828UH1 TIPS Treasury, United States Department of 01/15/2023 02/05/2018 187,890.50 185,392.42 --- 184,762.12 (703.73) 0.125 0.477 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 9I2828UH1 TIPS Treasury, United States Department of 01/15/2023 02/05/2018 32,209.80 31,781.56 -- 31,673.51 (120.64) 0.125 0.477 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828L99 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 10/31/2020 --- 1,250,000.00 _ 1,239,802.73 --- 1,219,037.50 (23,310.98) 1.375_ 2.368 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 9I2828L57 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 09/30/2022 -- 1,400,000.00 1,386,564.45 -- 1,353,240.00 (35,347.09) 1.750 2.540 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828G38 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 11/15/2024 04/18/2017 1,350,000.00 1,369,037.11 --- 1,314,724.50 (52,088.75) 2.250 2.683 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 9I2828B58 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 01/31/2021 -- 1,440,000.00 1,472,525.40 -- 1,429,531.20 (28,625.25) 2.125 2.391 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828VV9 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 08/31/2020 --- 585,000.00 597,363.67 --- 581,893.65 (11,113.82) 2.125 2.352 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 9I2828XB1 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 05/15/2025 05/24/2016 1,200,000.00 1,228,546.88 -- 1,155,612.00 (67,423.25) 2.125 2.699 AAA 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828VA5 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 04/30/2020 02/28/2017 160,000.00 158,131.25 --- 156,163.20 (2,599.58) 1.125 2.309 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 9I2828UF5 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 12/31/2019 01/17/2018 115,000.00 113,000.98 -- 112,780.50 (424.14) 1.125 2.253 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 912828VK3 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of _ 06/30/2018 01/17/2018 130,000.00 _ 129,888.28 --- 129,859.60 (78.71) 1.375_ 1.796 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 9I2828QQ6 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 05/31/2018 01/30/2018 100,000.00 100,289.06 -- 100,105.00 (38.34) 2.375 1.743 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 9128281(25 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 04/15/2018 --- 215,000.00 214,781.64 --- 214,935.50 2.30 0.750 1.428 AAA 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 97689P2K3 VRDN Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority 09/01/2037 01/30/2018 100,000.00 100,000.00 05/02/2018 100,000.00 0.00 1.750 1.750 AA 21,205,727.44 22,277,128.97 21,803,636.96 (462,819.57) 28 Page 3 of 32 IOWRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interes 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Intern 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interns' 205091001 LC-2013 A Capitalized Interes 36290WH47 Agency MBS 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio by Account for quarter ended March 31, 2018 Govemn nt National ortgage Association 401MWC1 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 3128MBTH0 Agency MBS 9AMMF05B2 MM Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 313385VL7 Agency 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation U.S. Bank Money Mazket Account Fund FHLBanks Office of Finance 7A1LC5 Agency CMG Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 3137A5FP4 Agency CMG Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 8378CDK0 Agency CMG The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T 38378AWX5 Agency CMG The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T 416BVR6 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 3137AXHN6 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 7B1UF7 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 3129410UP8 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 6AC7J4 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 3137AWQG3 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 58769DAD2 Asset Backed Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2017-A 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 02582JGN4 Asset Backed American Express Credit Account Master Trust 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 89236WADO Asset Backed Toyota Auto Receivables 2015-A Owner Trus 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 161571FK5 Asset Backed Chase Issuance Tru 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 65479AAD4 Asset Backed Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2017-A 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 055657AC4 Asset Backed Bmw Vehicle Lease Tru 2017 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 14912L6M8 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 13607RAB6 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 89114QBF4 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 38141EA58 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 037833BD1 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 06406HCU1 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 86787EAS6 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 0258MODZ9 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 46625HKA7 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 91159HHE3 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 780082AC7 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 24422ESF7 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 06051GFN4 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 06416CAC2 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 61747WAF6 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 136069XZ9 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 05531FAQ6 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 254010AC5 Corporate 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 9AMMF05B2 MM Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 912828U141 TIPS 912828UF5 US Gov Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce Toronto Domtinion Bank The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Apple nc. The Bank of New York Mellon SunTmst B American Express Credit Corpora JPMorgan Chase & Co. U.S. Bancorp Royal Bank of Canad John Deere Capital Corporation Bank of America Coroomtion The Bank of Nava Scotia Morgan Stanley Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce BB&T Corporation Dignity Health U.S. Bank Money Mazket Account Fund Treasuy, United States Department o. Treasury, United States Department o 912828V1(3 US Gov Treasury, United States Department o. 912828QQ6 US Gov Treasury, United States Department o 912828K25 US Gov Treasury, United States Department o. 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 97689P2K3 VRDN Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority 09/15/2018 07/18/2013 06/O1/2018 07/12/2013 03/0l/2019 07/26/2013 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 03/31/2018 --- - 792,837.56 04/12/2018 03/29/2018 100,000.00 99,933.50 08/15/2020 01/17/2018 27,212.25 27,122.96 01/15/2021 01/30/2018 49,002.55 49,125.05 03/20/2035 01/30/2018 66,765.54 67,381.02 01/20/2036 01/30/2018 43,761.85 44,185.79 12/0]/2020 01/17/2018 73,982.63 75,647.23 02/25/2022 01/25/2018 38,452.77 37,924.05 09/25/2022 01/25/2018 21,363.22 21,049.45 I I/0l/2018 02/O1/2018 8,213.04 8,295.17 03/25/2023 02/21/2018 20,621.24 20,282.12 04/25/2022 01/30/2018 44,510.16 43,571.27 03/16/2020 --- 52,000.00 51,710.12 05/15/2019 01/16/2018 100,000.00 100,351.56 06/15/2020 01/19/2018 50,000.00 49,865.23 08/15/2019 01/25/2018 115,000.00 113,827.54 04/15/2020 01/25/2018 50,000.00 49,771.48 05/20/2020 01/29/2018 100,000.00 99,703.13 11/13/2018 01/19/2018 100,000.00 99,809.00 09/06/2019 01/19/2018 100000.00 98888.00 01/22/2019 01/19/2018 50,000.00 50,366.50 03/15/2020 01/25/2018 100,000.00 105,718.00 - 05/06/2020 01/25/2018 100,000.00 99,354.00 - 05/15/2019 01/25/2018 100,000.00 99,974.00 04/15/2019 01/31/2020 01/25/2018 100,000.00 100,644.00 12/31/2019 11/05/2018 01/25/2018 100,000.00 99,905.00 10/05/2018 01/23/2020 01/25/2018 100,000.00 99,577.00 12/23/2019 I I/15/2018 01/25/2018 100,000.00 100,035.00 10/15/2018 10/14/2020 01/25/2018 100,000.00 98,862.00 - 12/13/2018 01/25/2018 100,000.00 99,980.00 - 04/21/2020 01/25/2018 100,000.00 99,537.00 04/26/2021 01/29/2018 100,000.00 97,511.00 01/25/2021 01/29/2018 100,000.00 108,369.00 - 02/02/2021 01/26/2018 45,000.00 45,000.00 - 02/0l/2019 01/25/2018 100,000.00 100,106.00 0 /02/2019 11/0l/2019 03/15/2018 24,000.00 23,897.52 - 03/31/2018 03/28/2018 - 13,733.06 - 01/15/2023 02/05/2018 32,209.80 31,781.56 12/31/2019 01/17/2018 115,000.00 113,000.98 06/30/2018 01/17/2018 130,000.00 129,888.28 05/31/2018 01/30/2018 100,000.00 100,289.06 - 04/15/2018 - 215,000.00 214,781.64 - 09/0]/2037 01/30/2018 100,000.00 100,000.00 05/02/2018 ATTACHMENT 3 0.00 0.00 0.01 792,837.56 99,954.00 27,109.11 (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) 5.000 -1.675 0.200 0.000 6.25 0.000 1.292 5.03) 2.000 2.395 48,955.51 (163.61) 2.500 2.512 67,084.01 (248.99) 3.000 2.401 43,971.47 (194.45) 3.000 2.524 75,512.59 (50.51) 5.000 2.432 37,739.47 (193.28) 1.749 2.670 4.500 2.066 AAA 4.500 -3.625 AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA 20,942.15 (111.94) 1.785 2.676 AAA 8,330.57 44.83 5.000 -0.702 AAA 20,316.46 28.03 2.493 3.069 AAA 43,559.87 (41.32) 1.583 2.598 AAA 51,654.20 (99.07) 1.790 2.556 AAA 100,274.00 (49.89) 2.147 2.014 AAA 49,815.50 (91.87) 1.520 2.429 AAA 113,403.80 (553.45) 1.580 2.623 AAA 49,545.50 (255.06) 1.910 2.711 AAA 99,361.00 (389.14) 1.980 2.712 AAA 99,639.00 (214.98) 1.800 2.389 A 98 325.00 (692.38) 1.600 2.800 A 50,277.50 (20.53) 2.585 2.460 AA 104,270.00 (994.48) 5.375 3.110 A 98,740.00 (662.66) 2.000 2.620 AA 99,612.00 (366.09) 2.200 2.551 A 100,619.00 31.96 2.302 2.476 A 99,587.00 (339.72) 1.875 2.575 A 98,785.00 (827.91) 2.250 2.942 A 99,699.00 (327.73L 1.950 2.436 A 98,248.00 (685.34) 2.100 2.820 AAA 99,729.00 (255.141_ 1.950 2.339 A 98,545.00 (1,028.09) 2.250 2.984 A 96,954.00 (681.15) 1.875 2.919 AAA 106,572.00 (1,348.35) 5.750 3.288 A 45,028.80 28.80 2.093 2.596 A 99,553.00 (533.73) 2.250 2.793 A 23,897.76 (2.06) 1637 2.913 A 13,733.06 - 0.200 0.000 NA 31,673.51 (120.64) 0.125 0.477 AAA 112,780.50 (424.14) 1.125 2.253 AAA 129,859.60 (78.71) 1.375 1.796 AAA 100,105.00 (38.34) 2.375 1.743 AAA 214,935.50 2.30 0.750 1.428 AAA 100,000.00 - 1.750 1.750 AA 3,272,095.06 4,083,591.86 4,071,535.01 (11,957.63) 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 3137EADB2 Agency Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 5GOD75 Agency 3137EADR7 Agency 6A72D3 Agency Federal National Mortgage Association Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation O Federal National Mortgage Association 3137AUPE3 Agency CMO 8377RSZ9 Agency CMO 31395EZP5 Agency CMO 8377JZ89 Agency CMO 38376GB33 Agency CMO 8376T5Z1 Agency CMO 38378TAF7 Agency CMO 8380AZ34 Agency CMO 38378CRT6 Agency CMO 8376WA62 Agency CMO 38377RVKS Agency CMO 7ASNH3 Agency CMO 3137AXHP1 Agency CMO 7AJMF8 Agency CMO 3137ATRW4 Agency CMO 8378B7F0 Agency CMO 3137A5FP4 Agency CMO 8378CDK0 Agency CMO 38377LQT8 Agency CMO 8379KDN5 Agency MBS 36202F2H8 Agency MBS 8378XP62 Agency MBS 31381PEB0 Agency MBS 8378KWU9 Agency MBS 138EIPZ5 Agency MBS 1381T4E7 Agency MBS 3136A4M48 Agency MBS 6A7MN9 Agency MBS 31417YKF3 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Government National Mortgage Association Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed RE The Government National Mortgage Association Gu Government National Mortgage Association Ginnie Mae II anteed RE C Pass-T IC Pa s-T The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T Federal National Mortgage Association The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T Federal National Mortgage Association Federal National Mortgage Association Federal National Mortgage Association Federal National Mortgage Association Federal National Mortgage Association 01/13/2022 - 950,000.00 942,921.50 - 943,245.50 (6,414.89) 2.375 2.573 06/22/2020 05/06/2015 600,000.00 593,490.00 - 588,390.00 (8,712.27) 1.500 2.397 AAA 05/01/2020 05/15/2015 475,000.00 471,527.75 - 465 742.25 (7 766.18) 1.375 2.337 04/25/2022 07/03/2013 358,757.85 340,819.96 - 353,545.10 2,508.87 2.482 2.974 AAA 06/25/2022 - 379,000.00 366 344.03 - 371,988.50 (935.39) 2.396 2.849 06/16/2039 - 95,157.39 98,144.26 - 97,394.54 (198.38) 4.500 2.273 AAA O8/15/2019 07/09/2013 14,244.42 15,070.15 - 14,368.48 (60.55) 4.500 2.156 10/20/2039 07/05/2013 64,550.98 66,525.33 - 65,234.57 (571.34) 3.500 2.886 AAA 10/16/2044 01/23/2015 174,842.41 179,469.67 --- 175,129.15 (953.01) 3.500 2.969 01/16/2039 01/26/2015 96,706.36 101,033.97 --- 96,653.17 (3,351.34) 3.000 2.993 AAA 07/20/2041 07/05/2013 151,768.55 151,791.43 -- 150,176.49 (1,464.02) 2.500 2.825 04/20/2046 11/28/2016 159,204.10 163,663.06 --- 158,041.91 (5,184.06) 3.000 3.123 AAA 10/20/2040 05/22/2014 61,917.97 59,789.54 - 59,761.37 (186.90) 2.000 3.227 10/20/2039 - 96,355.10 100,307.76 --- 100,609.17 (490.63) 4.000 2.368 AAA 04/20/2039 - 111,233.66 114,370.79 - 111,288.16 (1,943.16) 3.000 2.931 09/25/2021 07/03/2013 210,041.80 205,258.42 - 206,177.03 (1,814.99) 1459 2.606 AAA 09/25/2022 09/29/2017 140,000.00 142,089.06 - 138,119.80 (3,743.65) 2.573 2.875 10/25/2021 08/05/2015 30,000.00 31,038.28 - 30,131.70 (438.53) 2968 2.784 AAA 05/25/2022 12/21/2016 125,000.00 124,804.69 - 122,681.25 (2,118.79) 2.373 2.837 12/16/2042 - 450,000.00 427,324.22 - 424,314.00 (]0,436.24) 2273 3.523 AAA 01/15/2021 - 137,077.58 137,093.08 - 136,945.98 (134.06) 2.500 2.512 03/20/2035 03/16/2018 37,091.96 37,265.83 - 37,268.89 (0.83) 3.000 2.401 AAA 12/20/2037 03/08/2018 13,655.47 13,655.47 - 13,680.59 25.28 3.000 2.458 09/16/2055 08/05/2015 168,839.03 164,525.71 - 159,590.03 (6,816.39) 2112 3.701 AAA 01/20/2027 11/14/2016 175,385.29 182,017.05 - 176,483.20 (5,163.97) 3.000 2.766 05/16/2055 05/14/2015 328,790.11 332,848.61 --- 314,757.34 (17,429.56) 2.500 3.486 AAA 11/01/2020 09/26/2014 254,516.25 267,997.66 - 258,272.91 (1,982.14) 3.370 2.847 11/16/2041 - 73,766.34 72,034.11 - 69,602.23 (3,188.10) 1400 4.151 AAA 07/01/2022 08/29/2016 278,000.62 295,277.92 - 277,405.70 (13,875.73) 2.973 3.015 03/01/2022 10/25/2016 266,308.66 278,240.54 - 264,380.58 (10,635.16) 2.670 3.084 AAA 01/25/2022 07/05/2013 235,782.50 236,445.64 - 232,505.12 (3,671.88) 2.098 4.398 05/25/2022 08/29/2016 300,000.00 308,578.13 - 293,502.00 (12,308.41) 2.349 3.073 AAA 01/O1/2030 07/10/2013 82,268.04 86,792.79 - 86,439.86 (191.45) 4.500 2.972 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund- 8378KRS0 Agency MBS 38378KXW4 Agency MBS The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T 07/16/2043 05/08/2015 450,000.00 434,460.94 --- 422,793.00 (16,858.18) 2.389 3.731 AAA 02/16/2037 12/11/2014 177,510.56 176,650.75 - 172,659.20 (4,425.42) 1.705 3.335 29 Page 4 of 32 IMFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio by Account for quarter ended March 31, 2018 Source Account Account Identifier Semi rite Trpc Category Issuer Final NI rarity Trade Date current IF!!M ir Value Original Cost Next Call Date Base Marko[ Value Base Net Total Unrealized Gain/Loss Summarized Coupon Yield Credit Bating 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3138EKXL4 Agency MBS 3138L33G8 Agency MBS 38378KSL4 Agency MBS 3138L76A9 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association Federal National Mortgage Association The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T Federal National Mortgage Association 3136AHAE0 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 38378B6A2 Agency MBS Government National Mortgage Association 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137B1U75 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 31381Q6B7 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 3136AC7J4 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 9AMMF05B2 MM Fund U.S. Bank Money Market Account Fund 912828V49 TIPS Treasury, United States Dement of 912828SA9 TIPS Treasury, United States Department of 912828UH1 TIPS Treasury, United States Department of 912828L99 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 912828L57 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 912828G38 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 912828B58 US Gov Treasury, United States De rtment of 912828V V9 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 912828X131 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 912828VA5 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 03/01/2023 06/01/2020 12/16/2046 11 /01 /2021 10/04/2016 11/12/2015 293,119.60 100 000.00 425,000.00 124,240.90 289,390.18 99,875.00 415,829.11 128,725.23 04/25/2023 10/28/2016 195,981.53 200,207.38 286,832.18 98 455.00 392,615.00 123,388.61 (2 952.81) (1,380.79) (25 388.18) (3,651.07) 2.356 2.952 2.010 2.675 2.811 3.942 2.590 2.856 AAA AAA AAA AAA 192,518.53 (6,816.99) 2.522 3.445 AAA 11/16/2052 01/22/2015 117,501.25 113,797.20 - 112,029.21 (3,146.92) 1.826 3.395 AAA 01/25/2023 08/29/2016 380,000.00 394,917.97 373,961.80 (16,818.18) 2.522 2.901 AAA 06/01/2021 07/15/2016 186,228.65 206,539.21 - 193,806.29 (5,790.20) 4.295 2.849 AAA 03/25/2023 02/21/2018 03/31/2018 01/15/2027 74,236.49 73,015.65 73,139.27 100.93 2.493 3.069 AAA 171,587.89 - 171,587.89 - 0.200 0.000 287,260.40 285,917.55 279,955.37 (6,082.49L 0.375 0.673 AAA 01/15/2022 - 454,400.10 456,702.75 - 449,569.83 (6,791.34) 0.125 0.408 AAA 01/15/2023 02/05/2018 187,890.50 185,392.42 - 184,762.12 (703.73) 0.125 0.477 AAA 10/31/2020 - 1,250,000.00 1,239,802.73 - 1,219,037.50 (23,310.98) 1.375 2.368 AAA 09/30/2022 - 1,400,000.00 1,386,564.45 - 1,353,240.00 (35,347.09) 1.750 2.540 AAA 11/15/2024 04/18/2017 1,350,000.00 1,369,037.11 - 1,314,724.50 (52,088.75) 2.250 2.683 AAA 01/31/2021 - 1,440,000.00 1,472,525.40 1,429,531.20 (28,625.25) 2.125 2.391 AAA 08/31/2020 - 585,000.00 597,363.67 - 581,893.65 (11,113.82) 2.125 2.352 AAA 05/15/2025 05/24/2016 1,200,000.00 1,228,546.88 04/30/2020 02/28/2017 160,000.00 158,131.25 1,155,612.00 156,163.20 (67,423.25) 2.125 2.699 AAA (2,599.58) 1.125 2.309 AAA 17,933,632.38 18,193,537.10 17,732,101.95 (450,861.94) 30 Page 5 of 32 IMFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account Quarter ended March 31, 2018 ATTACHMENT 4 Source Beginning Base Base Maturities and Base Base Change In Net Total Realized Amortization/A Net Unrealized Ending Base Ending Accrued 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interns 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized Interest 205091001 LC 2013 A Capitalized lntered 9AMMF05B2 U.S. BANK MONEY MARKET ACCOUNT FUND 3128MBTH0 FH G13052 31401MWC1 FN 71264 36290WH47 GN 619551 792,702.97 0.02 0.00 0.00 792,703.00 34.59 134.59 (0.01) (0.00) (0.00) (0.01) (0.00) (0.00 (0.00) 792,837.56 0.01 0.00 0.00 792,837.58 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 38141EA58 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 61747WAF6 MORGAN STANLEY 105,718.00 108,369.00 (453.52) (448.65) (994.48) (1,348.35) 104,270.00 106,572.00 238.89 1,054.17 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 912828006 UNITED STATES TREASURY 100,289.06 (145.72) (38.34) 100,105.00 796.02 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 31416BVR6 FN 995324 89114QBF4 TORONTO-DOMINION BANK 85,538.33 50.366.50 (9,673.44) (217.65) (84.15) (68.47) (50.51) (20.53) 75,512.59 50.277.50 308.26 247.70 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 86787EAS6 38378CDK0 025821GN4 SUNTRUST BANK GNR 11169G AK AMXCA 141 A 100,644.00 70,214.15 100,351.56 (2,807.25) (25.00) (56.96) (48.91) (27.67) 31.96 (2(r89) (49.89) 100,619.00 67,084.01 100,274.00 383.71 166.91 101.37 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 38378AWX5 GNR 11157E QA 05531FAQ6 BB&T CORP 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 31294KUP8 FH E01490 45,699.91 (1,499.59) (14.14) (20.25) (194.45) 100,106.00 (19.27) (533.73) 9,887.67 (1,576.73) (15.76) (9.45) 44.83 43,971.47 99,553.00 109.40 375.00 8,330.57 34.22 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 91159HHE3 U.S. BANCORP 3137A5FP4 FHR 3791E DA 100,035.00 51,520.10 (2,389.07) (6.26) (8.27) (5.66) (327.73) (163.61) 99,699.00 48,955.51 736.67 102.09 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256351)021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 05581QAE8 BMWLT 152 A4 9AMMF05B2 U.S. BANK MONEY MARKET ACCOUNT FUND 97689P2K3 WISCONSIN HSG & ECONOMIC DEV AUTH HOME OWNERSHIP R 38,738.54 429,900.65 100.000.60 (3,708,950.30) (38,749.13) 10.88 (0.29) 13,733.06 100.000.00 134.17 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 196479JIA 136069XZ9 3137A1LC5 254010AC5 06406HCU1 COLORADO HSG & FIN AUTH CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE FHR 3710F AB DIGNITY HEALTH BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP 100,000.00 45,000.00 30,301.87 23,897.52 99,974.00 (100,000.00) (3,189.37) 10.53 1.12 2.30 4.09 28.80 (15.03) (2.06) (366.09) 45,028.80 27,109.11 23,897.76 99,612.00 151.73 45.35 263.70 831.11 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 24422ESF7 3137B1UF7 3136AC7J4 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP FHMS K027 Al FNA 13M62A 99,980.00 21,844.99 21,510.51 (807.40) (1 248 93) 11.93 2051. 4.14 4.57 6.34 (255.14) (111.94) 28.03 99,729.00 20,942.15 20,316.46 585.00 31.78 42.84 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 3137AXHN6 FHMS K024 Al 58769DAD2 MBALT 17A A3 313385VL7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 0258MODZ9 AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORP 654794AD4 NALT 17A A3 39,502.26 14,895.12 99,933.50 99,905.00 49,771.48 (1,600.21) 22.14 8.56 9.01 14.25 21.72 29.08 (193:28) (3.87) 6.25 (339.72) (255.06) 37,739.47 14,900.25 99,954.00 99,587.00 49,545.50 56.04 11.93 760.42 42.44 r256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 3137AW0G3 FHMS K023 Al 44,513.09 (962 111 19.99 30.22 (41.32) 43,559.87 58.72 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 58769DAD2 MBALT 17A A3 9128281{25 UNITED STATES TREASURY 36,815.00 49,949.22 34.15 34.98 (95.20) 0.80 36,753.95 49,985.00 29.44 173.08 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 46625HKA7 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 99,577.00 35.91 (827.91) 98,785.00 425.00 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 06051GFN4 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 89236WAD0 TAOT 15A A4 99,537.00 49,865.23 36.09 42.14 (1,028.09) (91.87) 98,545.00 49,815.50 1,000.00 33.78 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 14912L6M8 055657AC4 037833BD1 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP BMWLT 171 A3 APPLE INC 99,809.00 99,703.13 99.354.60 44.98 47.01 48.66 (214.98) (389.14) (662.66) 99,639.00 99,361.00 98.746 06 690.00 766 665° . 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 912828VK3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 129,888.28 50.03 (78.71) 129,859.60 449.34 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 912828UR9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 64,949.22 (65,000.00) 50.78 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 97684HBD2 Wisconsin Public Service Corporation 99,936.61 (100,000.00) 63.39 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 780082AC7 ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 912828K25 UNITED STATES TREASURY 98,862.00 164,832.42 71.34 116.58 (685.34) 1.50 98,248.00 164,950.50 974.17 571.15 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 06416CAC2 BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 13607RAB6 CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE 97,511.00 98,888.00 124.15 129.38 (681.15) (692.38) 96,954.00 98,325.00 807.29 111.11 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 161571FK5 CHAFI 124A 113,827.54 129.71 (553.45) 113,403.80 80.76 256350021 LC-RCTC 2013 Residual Fund 912828UH1 UNITED STATES TREASURY 31,627.36 166.79 (120.64) 31,673.51 8.45 256350021 LGRCTC 2013 Residual Fund 912828UF5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 196,523.44 4,119,863.26 (83,470.701 (3,792,421.00) (265,000.001 (64,503.23) (]05.38) 257.28 (424.14) 112,780.50 (288.20) 221.53 (11,957.63) 3,278,697.43 325.22 14,175.59 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 31381Q6B7 FN 468066 198,121.22 (851.12) (64.09) (1,030.63) (2,369.09) 193,806.29 688.76 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 31381PEB0 FN 466430 912828XB1 UNITED STATES TREASURY 262,278.57 1,181,676.00 (1,208.10) (30.17) (859.36) (751.25) (1,908.03) (25,312.75) 258,272.91 1,155,612.00 738.59 9,650.55 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 31381T4E7 FN 470721 270,159.40 (1,629.53) (56.17) (671.59) (3,421.53) 264,380.58 612.29 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137B1U75 FHMS KS01 A2 380,877.80 (664.82) (6,251.18) 373,961.80 798.63 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828B58 UNITED STATES TREASURY 732,569.60 (656.47) (7,220.23) 724,692.90 2,571.13 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828G38 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1,343,034.00 (588.16) (27,721.34) 1,314,724.50 11,495.51 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828V V9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 351,613.50 (455.04) (3,016.96) 348,141.50 646.74 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3136A7MN9 FNA 12M8 A2 298,494.00 (432.64) (4,559.36) 293,502.00 587.35 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828B58 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3137EADB2 FREDDIE MAC 501,760.00 201,798.00 (199,453.13) (3,238.46) (412.89) (340.99) (836.52) (2,879.01) 297,819.00 198,578.00 1,056.63 1,029.17 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3138L76A9 FN AM7164 125,347.75 (570.161 (13.72) (287.34) (1,087.92) 123,388.61 277.09 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3136AHAE0 FNA 13M14 API 912828V V9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 197,267.08 150,691.50 (846.63) (15.25) (271.00) (265.56) (3,615.66) (1,222.44) 192,518.53 149,203.50 411.89 277.17 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137EADB2 FREDDIE MAC 201,798.00 (260.39) (2,959.61) 198,578.00 1,029.17 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828B58 UNITED STATES TREASURY 38378CRT6 GNR 1213E EG 100,352.00 63,903.37 (3,595.73) 101.89 (241.80) (199.87) (837.20) 048.28) 99,273.00 59,761.37 352.21 103.20 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828B58 UNITED STATES TREASURY 38376GB33 GNR 116 BA 145,510.40 187,917.05 (11,983.57) (91.81) (173.06) (139.79) (1,391.49) (572.72) 143,945.85 175,129.15 510.70 509.96 256350021 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38377R3Z9 GNR 10162D PO 85.080.32 (7.167.921 (168.611 (125. 141 69.59 77.688.25 284.64 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378XP62 GNR 14166 PL 326,331.10 (5,754.06) (61.54) (118.56) (5,639.58) 314,757.34 684.98 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137AXHP1 FHMS K024 A2 140,798.00 (115.18) (2,563.02) 138,119.80 300.18 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 36202F2H8 G2 005276 190,443.22 (10,262.65) (370.00) (110.95) (3,216.42) 176,483.20 438.46 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828B58 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3137AUPE3 FHMS K021 A2 115,404.80 143,896.32 (105.76) (99.06) (1,135.09) (2,461.26) 114,163.95 141,336.00 405.04 287.52 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3136A4M48 FNA 12M3A 1A1 248,870.00 (14,282.81) (29.94) 232,505.12 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38376T5Z1 GNR 104A PD 103,739.97 (5,860.25) 96,653.17 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828VV9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 85,391.85 84,548.65 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 164,475.53 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 92,784.14 31 Page 6 of 32 IMFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account Quarter ended March 31, 2018 Source Beginning Base Base Maturities and Base Base Change In Net Total Realized Amortization/A Net Unrealized Ending Base Ending Accrued 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 3137AJMF8 FHMS K016 A2 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38377RVK8 GNR 10166F GP 912828658 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3138EIPZ5 FN AL2239 38377RVK8 GNR 10166F GP FHR 2835G MD 31395EZP5 30,595.80 44,263.60 50,176.00 311,242.67 73,772.67 19,732.36 (2,121.84) (29,105.32) (3,536.41) (5.334.461 (55.48) (1,392.57) (49.05) (73.061 (45.52) (44.17) (42.60) (39.19) (38.60) (25.751 (418.58) (309.05) (496.90) (3,299.89) (593.51) 69.40 30,131.70 41,733.06 49,636.50 277,405.70 69,555.10 14.368.48 74.19 104.28 176.11 711.70 173.80 53.42 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38377RSZ9 GNR 10162D PQ 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378TAF7 GNR 1371A GA 22,851.38 161,122.47 (3,006.95) (8,998.63) (111.51) (15.54) 7.01 (10.42) (11.08) 19,706.29 (1,943.93) 150,176.49 72.20 316.18 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137A5FP4 FHR 3791E DA 86,182.35 (3,996.42) (10.46) (9.46) (273.69) 81,892.32 170.77 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3138L33G8 FN AM3498 3137A5FP4 FHR 3791E DA 99,388.00 54,917.14 (4.46) (3.11) (928.54) 139.63 98,455.00 55,053.66 173.08 114.81 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137ATRW4 MIMS K020 A2 313811K17A FNAL3382 124,708.75 20,269.74 (0.78) (0.77) (2,026.72) 219.04 122,681.25 20,488.01 247.19 42.48 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 31392E83 FNR 0317D HC 402.42 (402.48) (0.44) (0.191 0.69 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38377LQT8 GNR 10128D KE 13,655.47 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 9AMMF05B2 U.S. BANK MONEY MARKET ACCOUNT FUND 107,572.21 664,530.12 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 31385XBG1 FN 555439 0.02 (0.15) 25.28 13,680.59 (600,514.44) 171,587.89 (0.02) (0.00) 34.14 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378CDK0 GNR 11169G AK 37,265.83 3.89 (0.83) 37,268.89 92.73 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 383771Z89 GNR 10117A GK 71,195.64 (5,107.30) (97.22) 5.55 (762.09) 65,234.57 188.27 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378KWU9 GNR 1396A 14,923.50 (126.79) 1.54 10.55 (155.71) 14,653.10 18.12 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378KXW4 GNR 13105 A 176,014.22 (1,963.93) 4.80 12.67 (1,408.56) 172,659.20 252.21 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3136AC7J4 FNA 13M62A 77,437.85 (4,496.14) 73.82 22.82 100.93 73,139.27 154.23 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378KSIA GNR 1374 AL 38378KWU9 GNR 1396A 912828L99 UNITED STATES TREASURY 38378B6A2 GNR 1312A AB 38376WA62 GNR 1015C PD 213,754.50 55,963.13 147,580.50 112,621.21 52,924.04 (475.44) (694.05) (3,649.09) 6.71 14.07 (121.36) 33.48 33.93 37.47 78.51 84.10 (5,932.98) (579.19) (1,333.47) 9.48 501.68 207,855.00 54,949.13 146,284.50 112,029.21 49,739.36 527.01 67.94 866.02 178.80 158.79 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3138EKXL4 FN AL3382 38378KSIA GNR 1374 AL 273,007.91 190,004.00 (2,045.74) 20.57 95.59 98.44 (4,734.16) (5,342.44) 266,344.17 184,760.00 552.20 468.46 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378B7F0 GNR 1333 B 192,544.00 126.39 (4,086.391 188,584.00 378.83 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38379KDN5 GNR 1529 AD 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137ASNH3 FHMS K019 Al 166,536.93 223,860.54 (4,033.68) 59.68 128.97 (3,101.87) 159,590.03 297.16 (16,537.70) 168.15 140.31 (1,454.27) 206,177.03 255.38 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828VA5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 157,144.00 145.23 (1,126.03) 156,163.20 755.80 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38376WA62 GNR 1015C PD 3137EADR7 FREDDIE MAC 57,415.51 467,898.75 (5,890.80) (366.44) 147.88 174.81 (436.34) (2,331.31) 50,869.81 465,742.25 162.40 2,721.35 125635/)021 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828L57 UNITED STATES TREASURY 538.976 00 200.52 (7.546 521 511.61(100 26.3(1 1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828V49 UNITED STATES TREASURY 55,758.31 249.18 (1,016.26) 54,991.23 44.42 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3135GOD75 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 592,884.00 315.81 (4,809.81) 588,390.00 2,475.00 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 38378B7F0 GNR 1333 B 240,680.00 374.40 (5,324.40) 235,730.00 473.54 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828L57 UNITED STATES TREASURY 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 3137AUPE3 FHMS K021 A2 832,966.00 234,830.80 397.17 (11,753.17) 821,610.00 40.64 407.25 (4,585.55) 230,652.50 469.22 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 25635/)021 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund 38378KRS0 3136A72D GNR 1378 AG A 12M9 A2 3137EADB2 FREDDIE MAC 431,235.00 360,947.95 554.944.50 ,970.05) 44.18 463.69 503.8 609.16 (8,905.69) (5,980.79) (9.464.161 422,793.00 353,545.10 546.069.50 895.72 742.03 2.83(121 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 256350023 LC -Sr Lien Reserve Fund-1 912828L99 UNITED STATES TREASURY 912828SA9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 912828UH1 UNITED STATES TREASURY 912828V49 UNITED STATES TREASURY 912828SA9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1,082,257.00 179,098.91 228,102.19 271,361.99 17,677,641.47 184,492.92 1,276,755.78 (799967.57) 682.59 781.96 972.93 1,122.89 1,206.67 (10,186.59) (1,136.24) (703.73) (4,260.95) (1,743.46) 1,072,753.00 178,744.63 184,762.12 224,964.14 270,825.20 6,350.83 47.41 49.31 181.73 71.84 (176,014.46) (6,467.26) (391.69) (239,454.32) 17,732,101.95 62,523.40 8,470,344.47 5,396,753.63 (4,592,388.57) (265,000.00) (240,517.69) (6,755.47) (170.16) (251,411.%) 21,803,636.96 76,698.99 32 Page 7 of 32 015.- RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio Summary of Investments for quarter ended March 31, 2018 ATTACHMENT 5 C redit Rating 25.0Q0,fl06 v d 6 20,000.000 Q y 15,000.000 a 3 �i 10.000.000 'L m m 5.000,444 N co m A+ A- Asset Class Cash 1-0-54%1 Money Market Funds {4.47%). Fixed Income (96-67%) *Negative cash reflects securities in transit at month end Industry Group Other (6.79%) Agency Callas " rr PAC CMG (2.611561 Agency Collet CMG (3.3396) f Cash (3-92'.61 6anke W07 %) FNMA eel lateral (7-62%) Commercial) MSS (2 LT%) -Sovereign (4e.rw%] Other [15./1'A1 PIILMC CM6 0_01%1 CORP 17.4370 G NMA CIAO' (7. 93%) GNMA {6.33%] Security Type AGCY HONE (9.14%) ---US GOV 130.013.4) FNMA (11.33%) Market Sector Other (6.4s9%1 Inaustrlai (7-4456] Assel Hacked (2. t 2%) Cam (3.92%] Financial + (5.95%) Agency (9.62%) Mortgage Hacked (36.4.5%) - 'Gov ent 1'39.97%1 33 INFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio Series A & Series B Reserve Fund Summary of Investments for quarter ended March 31, 2018 ATTACHMENT 6 Credit Rating 20.000.000 2 15,000.000 Q • 10.000.000 cn z 5,000.000 m N m m AAA. NA Asset Class pan -0.67.%k �I Manny Mbrkol FN nds 1a.96%1 1 Fixed Income (99.70%i *Negative cash reflects securities in transit at month end Security Type A CMO- (SA 1 19.5256} GNMA (1024%) AGCY BOND 111.27%1 FNMA (13-40%) Industry Group cash to-gsN GNMA2 Calleterel Agency Collet' CMO (3.29%1 Agency Collet PAC CMO f3.31%) FNMA Collateral (S.94%) commerc la! MBs 526-06%1 - Sovereign 157. hj US GOV (40-6%1 Market Sector Government (45.22%) Mortgage Bxckorl (42.50%) 34 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTACHMENT 7 91 CIP STAMP Portfolio Residual Fund Required Retained Balance Summary of Investments for quarter ended March 31, 2018 Credit Rating 2,000.000 2 • 1 , 5tio.000 Q m 1.000,000 • 500,0❑0 cn AAA AA.— A+ Commercial MSS (3.72%) Agency Collet -- CMG, (5.69`.b) Auto Lease Lome (6.09%) crawl card ADS (6.49%) Diversified Flnan Sera (12.53%) Industry Group Other (17.39%) �a -Banks (27.0%j Sovereign Security Type AGCY DISC VRON" (3.0%) / FHLMC (3.10%1 GNMA CMG (3.3%) ABS (14.101A) Omar (6.88%) IJ5 GOV (t 7.00%) CORP 149.44%j Market Sector Other (0.4S%) Agency (3.03%)/ Municipal" •/ (3.d%) industrial (9.8474 Mortgage Backed (1 t.977o) ASYet Backed (14.19%) Government (17.96%) -- Financial (39.59%1 35 ATTACHMENT 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category for quarter ended March 31, 2018 Source Account Account Identifier Security Type Category Issuer Final Maturity Trade Date Current Face Value ext Call Original Cost Date Base Market Value Base Net Total Unrealized Gain/Loss Coupon Summarized Yield Credit Rating 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 313385VE3 Agency FHLBanks Office of Finance 04/06/2018 03/26/2018 900,000.00 899,546.25 --- 899,838.00 44.28 0.000 0.939 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 313385VE3 Agency FHLBanks Office of Finance 04/06/2018 03/26/2018 5,100,000.00 5,097,428.75 --- 5,099,082.00 250.91 0.000 0.939 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESER) 3I3385VJ2 Agency FHLBanks Office of Finance 04/10/2018 03/28/2018 200,000.00 199,881.56 --- 199,926.00 8.00 0.000 1.228 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 3137ASR97 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 01/25/2022 02/27/2018 117,178.82 _ 114,542.30 --- 114,338.41 (252.89) 1.573 2.765 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137A7NT3 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 08/25/2020 12/20/2017 83,254.99 83,833.87 --- 83,433.16 (316.79) 2.917 2.468 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137AKKC4 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 09/25/2018 12/04/2017 175,000.00 175,410.16 --- 174,604.50 (524.22) 2.303 2.478 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue:-I-15 3137AL6V6 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 10/25/2018 12/01/2017 678,680.04 680,323.73 --- 677,594.16 (1,723.57) 2.323 2.344 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: -I-15 3137ANMN2 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 12/25/2018 12/01/2017 315,000.00 315,529.10 --- 314,165.25 (1,030.49) 2.220 2.418 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137ASR97 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 01/25/2022 02/27/2018 535,294.18 523,250.06 --- 522,318.64 (1,155.26) 1.573 2.765 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 31398E2E3 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 01/25/2019 01/03/2018 90,618.66 92,431.03 --- 91,550.22 (429.94) 5.053 2.806 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137FBUW4 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 10/25/2019 01/23/2018 830,000.00 830,389.06 --- 830,000.00 (714.05) 1.780 2.126 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESER) 3137ANMN2 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 12/25/2018 12/05/2017 1,800,000.00 1,803,697.20 --- 1,795,230.00 (6,337.22) _ 2.220 2.418 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESER) 3137ASR97 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 01/25/2022 02/27/2018 39,947.33 39,048.51 -- 38,979.00 (86.21) 1.573 2.765 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESER) 3137B84S3 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 02/15/2029 01/31/2018 172,760.64 170,601.13 --- 169,932.55 (684.36) 2.000 2.822 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESER) 3137A5FP4 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 01/15/2021 01/30/2018 84,037.51 84,247.61 -- 83,956.83 (280.59) 2.500 2.512 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 31398NG99 Agency CMO Federal National Mortgage Association 10/25/2025 03/21/2018 _95,854.26 95,434.90 --- 95,362.53 (56.68) _ 2.000 2.594 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue:-I-15 31397Q4Q8 Agency CMO Federal National Mortgage Association 03/25/2035 01/10/2018 382,264.07 385,489.43 -- 384,614.99 (201.25) 4.000 1.696 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 31398NG99 Agency CMO Federal National Mortgage Association 10/25/2025 03/21/2018 316,530.29 315,145.47 --- 314,906.49 (187.20) _ 2.000 2.594 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESER) 31392J6N4 Agency CMO Federal National Mortgage Association 04/25/2023 12/05/2017 673,422.40 732,603.34 -- 704,911.63 (24,676.87) 5.500 2.840 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESER) 31397SE83 Agency CMO Federal National Mortgage Association 02/25/2039 01/30/2018 75,816.45 76,242.91 --- 75,949.89 (195.59) _ 4.000 3.018 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESER) 3I398N2K9 Agency CMO Federal National Mortgage Association 11/25/2025 01/31/2018 67,337.64 67,590.16 -- 67,357.17 (178.22) 3.500 2.725 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESER) 383742C76 Agency CMO Government National Mortgage Association 08/16/2037 01/31/2018 101,079.71 103,606.69 --- 103,553.13 16.17 4.000 2.842 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESER) 38375JCJ2 Agency CMO Government National Mortgage Association 12/16/2037 01/31/2018 39,258.99 39,381.68 -- 39,517.71 154.72 5.305 3.185 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESER) 38378CDK0 _ Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 03/20/2035_ 01/30/2018 155,786.25 157,222.40 --- 156,529.35 (580.99) 3.000 2.401 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESER) 38378AWX5 Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 01/20/2036 01/30/2018 218,809.26 220,928.98 -- 219,857.36 (972.27) 3.000 2.524 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESER) 38376THB 1 Agency CMO The Government National Mortgage Association Guarantt 10/20/2037 01/30/2018 8,922.74 8,939.47 --- 8,935.77 11.75 4.000 0.149 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137A6AZ5 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 07/25/2020 01/10/2018 77,934.54 78,567.76 -- 78,209.65 (263.31) 3.320 2.436 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137B6ZL8 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 12/25/2019 12/20/2017 114,230.11 114,176.57 --- 113,847.44 (289.89) 2.075 2.434 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESER) 31283K5N4 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 08/01/2020 12/05/2017 898,416.90 918,652.84 -- 916,322.35 (38,639.84) 5.000 2.677 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESER) 3137B1U75 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 01/25/2023 02/27/2018 120,000.00 117,965.63 --- 118,093.20 94.84 2.522 2.901 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESER) 3137AXHN6 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 02/25/2022 01/25/2018 91,695.08 90,434.27 -- 89,994.13 (460.89) 1.749 2.670 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESER) 3137B1UF7 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 09/25/2022 01/25/2018 45,778.34 45,105.97 --- 44,876.05 (239.87) 1.785 2.676 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 3136A7MK5 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 12/25/2019 03/21/2018 74,894.90 74,450.22 -- 74,361.65 (77.74) 1.801 2.901 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3136AK2A0 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 09/25/2019 01/08/2018 224,079.86 223,738.76 --- 222,522.50 (1,234.77) 2.171 2.726 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue:-I-15 3136ASPX8 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 06/25/2019 02/14/2018 355,129.74 354,151.41 -- 353,410.91 (669.71) 1.785 2.621 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: -I-15 31381S5E8 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 12/01/2018 12/01/2017 443,934.67 445,668.79 --- 443,677.19 (1,165.03) 2.640 2.468 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESER) 3I36AC7J4 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 03/25/2023 02/21/2018 61,863.74 60,846.37 -- 60,949.39 84.11 2.493 3.069 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESER) 31418ASD1 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 04/01/2023 01/31/2018 99,997.04 99,025.88 --- 98,690.08 (340.22) 2.000 2.593 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESER) 3I36A96F0 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 11/25/2022 02/27/2018 75,000.00 72,694.34 -- 72,645.00 (99.61) 2.184 3.422 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 36225B5Y0 Agency MBS Government National Mortgage Association 06/15/2019 12/21/2017 66,544.68 _ 67,293.31 --- 66,923.32 (180.05) 5.500 2.748 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 02582JGN4 Asset Backed American Express Credit Account Master Trust 05/15/2019 01/16/2018 252,000.00 252,885.94 -- 252,690.48 (125.74) 2.147 2.014 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 05522RCQ9 Asset Backed BA Credit Card Trust 01/15/2019 03/21/2018 325,000.00 _ 325,710.94 --- 325,744.25 59.94 2.157 1.979 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue:-I-15 05522RCQ9 Asset Backed BA Credit Card Trust 01/15/2019 03/21/2018 1,100,000.00 1,102,406.25 -- 1,102,519.00 202.89 2.157 1.979 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 05581RAD8 Asset Backed Bmw Vehicle Lease Trust 2016-1 01/22/2019 12/22/2017 688,815.12 687,846.48 --- 687,644.13 (672.96) 1.340 2.693 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 05582XAB8 Asset Backed Bmw Vehicle Lease Trust 2016-2 01/22/2019 12/22/2017 162,453.54 162,225.10 -- 162,279.72 (78.85) 1.230 2.808 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 05582XAD4 Asset Backed Bmw Vehicle Lease Trust 2016-2 09/20/2019 07/27/2017 965,000.00 963,002.14 --- 959,287.20 (4,924.68) 1.430 2.717 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 161571HA5 Asset Backed Chase Issuance Trust 07/16/2018 12/19/2017 360,000.00 359,690.63 -- 359,168.40 (673.47) 1.620 2.420 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: -I-15 161571FW9 Asset Backed Chase Issuance Trust 04/16/2018 --- 1,325,000.00 1,325,765.62 --- 1,325,079.50 (45.79) 2.057 1.936 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue:-I-15 161571GY4 Asset Backed Chase Issuance Trust 04/16/2018 -- 360,000.00 359,524.92 -- 359,866.80 (53.90) 1.360 2.203 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 161571HA5 Asset Backed Chase Issuance Trust 07/16/2018 01/02/2018 1,500,000.00 _ 1,498,710.94 --- 1,496,535.00 (2,761.77) _ 1.620 2.420 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue:-I-15 161571HC1 Asset Backed Chase Issuance Trust 06/17/2019 -- 763,000.00 758,373.05 -- 752,188.29 (7,723.18) 1.370 2.570 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 161571HJ6 Asset Backed Chase Issuance Trust 01/15/2020 03/23/2018 500,000.00 _ 501,347.66 --- 501,345.00 11.63 _ 2.077 2.038 _ AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue:-I-15 41284AAE8 Asset Backed Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2014-1 10/15/2021 11/27/2017 355,045.52 354,879.09 -- 354,662.07 (268.05) 1.550 1.813 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 41284CAD6 Asset Backed Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2015-2 03/16/2020 01/31/2018 31,910.84 31,873.45 --- 31,866.17 (17.71) 1.300 2.382 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 43814KAD3 Asset Backed Honda Auto Receivables 2015-1 Owner Trust 11/16/2020 07/24/2017 656,898.60 656,154.45 -- 657,286.17 645.02 1.320 1.115 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 43814LAC3 Asset Backed Honda Auto Receivables 2015-4 Owner Trust 09/23/2019 11/09/2017 82,381.29 82,178.55 --- 81,974.33 (252.07) 1.230 2.425 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 43814LAC3 Asset Backed Honda Auto Receivables 2015-4 Owner Trust 09/23/2019 07/24/2017 812,973.25 811,258.38 -- 808,957.16 (3,042.41) 1.230 2.425 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 43813FAA1 Asset Backed Honda Auto Receivables 2017-4 Owner Trust 12/21/2018 11/22/2017 725,772.75 725,772.75 --- 725,772.75 0.00 1.430 1.500 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 47787UAE3 Asset Backed John Deere Owner Trust 2015 12/15/2021 07/24/2017 747,000.00 747,350.16 -- 745,252.02 (1,841.15) 1.650 2.262 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 47787UAD5 Asset Backed John Deere Owner Trust 2015 _ 06/17/2019 12/21/2017 38,878.40 _ 38,817.65 --- 38,834.85 (15.99) 1.320 2.713 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 47788CAA0 Asset Backed John Deere Owner Trust 2018 03/15/2019 02/21/2018 750,000.00 750,000.00 -- 750,015.00 15.00 1.950 2.010 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 47788CAA0 Asset Backed John Deere Owner Trust 2018 03/15/2019 02/21/2018 2,250,000.00 2,250,000.00 --- 2,250,045.00 45.00 1.950 2.010 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 58768MAC5 Asset Backed Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2016-B 08/15/2019 03/20/2018 272,000.00 270,650.63 -- 270,713.44 (24.17) 1.350 2.587 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 58768MAC5 Asset Backed Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2016-B 08/15/2019 --- 1,594,000.00 _ 1,589,467.81 --- 1,586,460.38 (5,376.98) 1.350 2.587 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 58769DAD2 Asset Backed Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2017-A 03/16/2020 07/27/2017 965,000.00 965,942.38 -- 958,582.75 (6,954.49) 1.790 2.556 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 65478QAD0 Asset Backed Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2016-A 03/15/2019 07/19/2017 1,175,965.10 _ 438.05 --- 1,173,801.32 1,057,576.07 1.490 2.530 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 65479AAD4 Asset Backed Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2017-A 04/15/2020 01/25/2018 850,000.00 846,115.23 -- 842,273.50 (4,336.06) 1.910 2.711 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 65477UAC4 Asset Backed Nissan Auto Receivables 10/15/2019 11/07/2017 48,543.18 _ 48,459.76 --- 48,416.48 (74.56) 1.050 2.436 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 65477UAC4 Asset Backed Nissan Auto Receivables 10/15/2019 11/07/2017 145,629.54 145,379.24 -- 145,249.44 (223.65) 1.050 2.436 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 65477PAD3 Asset Backed Nissan Auto Receivables 2014-A Owner Trust 08/17/2020 07/25/2017 245,070.03 244,964.73 --- 244,717.13 (300.56) 1.340 2.233 AAA 36 Page 11 of 32 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category for quarter ended March 31, 2018 Source Account 240907004 Account Identifier LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 65478AAD5 ecun ype Category Asset Backed ma Maturity 05/15/2020 Trade Date 12/21/2017 Base Market Value Base Net Total Unrealized Gain/Loss Coupon Summarized Yield Credit Rating Issuer Nissan Auto Receivables 2015-C Owner Trust Current Face Value 675,244.18 Original Cost 673,002.16 e: a I Date --- --- 671,138.70 (2,166.17) 1.370 2.506 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 89190AAD2 Asset Backed Toyota Auto Receivables 2014-C Owner Trust 04/15/2020 07/19/2017 873,215.93 873,079.49 871,984.69 (1,176.71) 1.440 2.704 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 89236WAC2 Asset Backed Toyota Auto Receivables 2015-A Owner Trust 02/15/2019 11/07/2017 12,279.45 12,269.38 --- 12,276.87 1.42 1.120 1.527 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 89236WADo Asset Backed Toyota Auto Receivables 2015-A Owner Trust 06/15/2020 01/19/2018 548,000.00 546,522.97 --- 545,977.88 (1,006.89) 1.520 2.429 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 90290XAD9 Asset Backed USAA Auto Owner Trust 2005-1 11/16/2020 03/22/2018 223,108.83 222,376.76 -- 222,361.42 (I6.03) 1.540 2.076 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 90290XAD9 Asset Backed USAA Auto Owner Trust 2005-I 11/16/2020 03/22/2018 758,570.03 756,080.98 --- 756,028.83 (54.48) 1.540 2.076 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESER) 62888VAA6 CMO NCUA Guaranteed Notes Trust 2011-R1 10/07/2020 01/30/2018 53,772.69 53,940.74 -- 53,968.96 38.38 2.030 2.181 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 00287YAN9 _ Corporate AbbVie Inc. 05/14/2018 12/21/2017 1,000,000.00 999,780.00 --- 999,270.00 _(661.94) 1.800 2.383 A 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 0258MOEJ4 Corporate American Express Credit Corporation 05/03/2019 07/19/2017 2,000,000.00 2,006,000.00 04/02/2019 2,002,340.00 (1,341.61) 2.117 2.510 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 0258MODK2 _ Corporate American Express Credit Corporation 03/18/2019 07/25/2017 1,000,000.00 1,006,560.00 --- 994,760.00 (9,189.16) _ 2.125 2.677 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 0258MOEE5 Corporate American Express Credit Corporation 03/03/2020 07/25/2017 500,000.00 503,990.00 02/01/2020 493,000.00 (9,970.91) 2.200 2.953 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 03523TAN8 Corporate Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide Inc. 01/15/2020 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,084,440.00 --- 1,046,140.00 (16,327.90) 5.375 2.717 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue:-I-15 94973VBE6 Corporate Anthem, Inc. 07/15/2018 07/26/2017 1,500,000.00 1,509,105.00 -- 1,498,710.00 (4,132.15) 2.300 2.585 A 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 06051GEY1 Corporate Bank of America Corporation 01/15/2019 07/19/2017 1,500,000.00 1,518,015.00 --- 1,510,200.00 558.64 2.762 2.490 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 06051GFN4 Corporate Bank of America Corporation 04/21/2020 12/04/2017 1,000,000.00 997,850.00 -- 985,450.00 (12,691.70) 2.250 2.984 A 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 06367TPX2 Corporate Bank of Montreal 12/12/2019 07/19/2017 1,630,000.00 1,637,318.70 --- 1,608,793.70 (26,468.51) _ 2.100 2.889 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue:-I-15 06367TPX2 Corporate Bank of Montreal 12/12/2019 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,005,160.00 -- 986,990.00 (16,780.09) 2.100 2.889 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: -I-15 07330NAL9 Corporate Branch Banking and Trust Company 05/10/2019 07/27/2017 1,000,000.00 _ 995,340.00 04/10/2019 985,610.00 (11,434.57) _ 1.450 2.773 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 149I2L6Y2 Corporate Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation 01/10/2020 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,008,020.00 -- 988,650.00 (17,273.78) 2.100 2.758 A 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 172967J05 Corporate Citigroup Inc. 04/27/2018 07/20/2017 1,950,000.00 _ 1,957,117.50 --- 1,950,429.00 (243.93) _ 2.450 2.158 BBB 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 172967HM6 Corporate Citigroup Inc. 04/08/2019 07/25/2017 1,000,000.00 1,010,110.00 -- 999,000.00 (7,239.02) 2.550 2.649 BBB 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 172967JJ1 Corporate Citigroup Inc. 02/18/2020 07/25/2017 500,000.00 503,600.00 --- 494,555.00 (8,149.49) 2.400 2.998 BBB 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue:-I-15 17401QAB7 Corporate Citizens Bank, National Association 12/04/2019 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,008,450.00 11/04/2019 989,040.00 (17,028.08) 2.450 3.124 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 20030NAW 1 _ Corporate Comcast Corporation 05/15/2018 12/21/2017 1,500,000.00 1,522,245.00 --- 1,505,715.00 (1,276.29) 5.700 2.587 A 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 2I688AAD4 Corporate Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. 01/14/2020 07/20/2017 2,000,000.00 2,016,800.00 -- 1,974,280.00 (37,971.74) 2.250 2.992 AA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 22546QAN7 _ Corporate Credit Suisse AG _ 05/28/2019 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,009,340.00 --- 993,630.00 (12,406.09) 2.300 2.860 A 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 375558BQ5 Corporate Gilead Sciences, Inc. 09/20/2019 09/14/2017 340,000.00 340,000.00 -- 340,207.40 207.40 2.452 2.512 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 375558BQ5 Corporate Gilead Sciences, Inc. 09/20/2019 09/14/2017 595,000.00 595,000.00 --- 595,362.95 362.95 2.452 2.512 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 40428HPN6 Corporate HSBC USA Inc. 11/13/2019 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,010,720.00 -- 990,910.00 (16,805.94) 2.375 2.953 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 24422ETJ8 Corporate John Deere Capital Corporation 10/09/2019 07/26/2017 1,125,000.00 1,114,650.00 --- 1,099,822.50 (17,872.97) 1.250 2.759 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 46625HHL7 Corporate JPMorgan Chase & Co. 04/23/2019 07/25/2017 1,000,000.00 1,075,520.00 -- 1,037,580.00 (9,654.28) 6.300 2.691 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 4662511KA7 Corporate JPMorgan Chase & Co. 01/23/2020 07/25/2017 500,000.00 503,005.00 12/23/2019 493,925.00 (8,280.83) 2.250 2.942 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue:-I-15 49327M2P8 Corporate KeyBank National Association 08/22/2019 07/24/2017 1,000,000.00 995,550.00 -- 984,360.00 (12,575.91) 1.600 2.750 A 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 61746BDY9 Corporate Morgan Stanley 02/01/2019 07/20/2017 1,950,000.00 1,981,200.00 --- 1,965,931.50 (1,270.66) 3.148 2.694 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 6I746BDM5 Corporate Morgan Stanley 01/24/2019 07/25/2017 1,000,000.00 1,009,060.00 -- 998,220.00 (6,872.11) 2.500 2.719 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 61747YDW2 Corporate Morgan Stanley 01/27/2020 07/25/2017 500,000.00 506,130.00 --- 496,920.00 (7,641.90) 2.650 2.998 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 7I8I72BF5 Corporate Philip Morris International Inc. 01/15/2019 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,003,040.00 -- 994,150.00 (7,535.96) 1.875 2.625 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 69353REV6 Corporate PNC Bank, National Association 03/04/2019 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,003,210.00 02/02/2019 993,680.00 (8,144.56) 1.950 2.643 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 74432QBW4 Corporate Prudential Financial, Inc. 08/15/2018 07/26/2017 1,500,000.00 1,510,920.00 -- 1,498,770.00 (5,282.45) 2.300 2.514 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 780082AA1 Corporate Royal Bank of Canada 02/05/2020 07/26/2017 1,500,000.00 1,497,390.00 --- 1,476,690.00 (21,361.66) 1.875 2.743 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue:-I-15 064I59HC3 Corporate The Bank of Nova Scotia 01/15/2019 01/23/2018 400,000.00 399,504.00 -- 397,828.00 (1,768.71) 1.950 2.646 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 38141GFM1 Corporate The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 04/01/2018 10/16/2017 1,000,000.00 1,020,020.00 --- 1,000,000.00 0.00 6.150 5.968 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 38141EA25 Corporate The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 02/15/2019 07/25/2017 1,000,000.00 1,084,540.00 -- 1,040,230.00 (8,844.81) 7.500 2.808 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 38141EA58 Corporate The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 03/15/2020 07/26/2017 500,000.00 540,800.00 --- 521,350.00 (9,523.90) 5.375 3.110 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue:-I-15 446438RN5 Corporate The Huntington National Bank 06/30/2018 07/27/2017 1,500,000.00 1,505,700.00 -- 1,498,440.00 (3,138.46) 2.000 2.406 A 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 89114QAV0 Corporate Toronto Dominion Bank 11/05/2019 07/20/2017 2,000,000.00 2,019,800.00 --- 1,983,540.00 (30,431.62) 2.250 2.780 AA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 891 I4QAS7 Corporate Toronto Dominion Bank 07/02/2019 07/27/2017 1,000,000.00 1,007,670.00 -- 993,180.00 (11,920.70) 2.125 2.680 AA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 89114QBE7 Corporate Toronto Dominion Bank 01/22/2019 01/23/2018 370,000.00 369,463.50 --- 368,124.10 (1,437.57) 1.950 2.584 AA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 90261XHE5 Corporate UBS AG 08/14/2019 07/25/2017 850,000.00 857,505.50 -- 843,786.50 (11,360.79) 2.375 2.921 A 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 94988J5G8 Corporate Wells Fargo Bank, National Association 12/06/2019 07/19/2017 2,000,000.00 2,014,280.00 --- 1,978,460.00 (31,770.72) 2.150 2.808 AA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 02360SD47 CP Ameren Corporation 04/04/2018 03/27/2018 1,495,000.00 1,494,235.89 -- 1,494,835.55 122.09 0.000 0.993 AA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 43357MD56 CP Hitachi Capital America Corp. 04/05/2018 03/27/2018 700,000.00 699,615.00 --- 699,888.00 59.11 0.000 1.155 AA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3I846V203 MM Fund First American Funds, Inc. 03/31/2018 03/26/2018 0.00 412,243.66 -- 412,243.66 0.00 1.250 1.250 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESER) 31846V203 MM Fund First American Funds, Inc. 03/31/2018 03/29/2018 0.00 20,993.45 --- 20,993.45 0.00 1.250 1.250 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 9AMMF05B2 MM Fund U.S. Bank Money Market Account Fund 03/31/2018 -- 0.00 144,201.68 -- 144,201.68 0.00 0.200 0.000 --- 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 392274A89 Muni Greater Orlando Aviation Authority. 10/01/2019 07/26/2017 700,000.00 724,094.00 --- 708,414.00 (8,546.47) 3.483 2.662 AA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 4I9792XC5 Muni Hawaii, State of 04/01/2018 01/31/2018 495,000.00 495,000.00 -- 495,000.00 0.00 1.750 1.735 AA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 54438CWT5 Muni Los Angeles Community College District 08/01/2018 11/09/2017 275,000.00 275,000.00 --- 274,747.00 (253.00) 1.620 1.890 AA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 54438CWT5 Muni Los Angeles Community College District 08/01/2018 11/09/2017 545,000.00 545,000.00 -- 544,498.60 (501.40) 1.620 1.890 AA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: -I-15 569203LT7 Muni Salem-Keizer School District#24J 06/15/2018 11/15/2017 400,000.00 399,684.00 --- 399,744.00 (143.82) 1.513 1.813 AA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue:-I-15 73358WT46 Muni The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey 09/15/2018 01/24/2018 220,000.00 220,000.00 -- 219,786.60 (213.40) 2.114 2.326 AA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 92419RAA0 Muni Vermont Housing Finance Agency 05/01/2018 01/09/2018 420,000.00 420,000.00 --- 419,916.00 (84.00) 1.840 2.057 AA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESER) 9I2828SA9 TIPS Treasury, United States Department of 01/15/2022 -- 317,532.60 315,171.58 -- 314,157.23 (1,124.42) 0.125 0.408 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESER) 912828UH1 TIPS Treasury, United States Department of 01/15/2023 02/05/2018 80,524.50 79,453.89 --- 79,183.77 (301.59) 0.125 0.477 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 9I2828UZ1 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 04/30/2018 03/14/2018 1,000,000.00 998,554.69 -- 999,250.00 141.79 0.625 1.498 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 912828V1C3 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 06/30/2018 03/22/2018 765,000.00 764,103.52 --- 764,173.80 (I1.22) 1.375 1.796 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 9128281(25 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 04/15/2018 -- 1,075,000.00 1,073,991.21 -- 1,074,677.50 1.26 0.750 1.428 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 912828UZ1 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 04/30/2018 01/31/2018 3,000,000.00 2,994,257.81 --- 2,997,750.00 (378.95) 0.625 1.498 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 9I2828V1(3 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 06/30/2018 03/22/2018 5,000,000.00 4,994,140.63 -- 4,994,600.00 (73.30) 1.375 1.796 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 9128281(25 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 04/15/2018 02/27/2018 2,500,000.00 2,497,558.59 --- 2,499,250.00 (6.96) 0.750 1.428 AAA 37 Page 12 of 32 COUNTY PirRIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio by Investment Category for quarter ended March 31, 2018 Source Account Account Identifier ecun ype Category US Gov ma Maturity Trade Date e: a I Date --- --- --- Base Market Value Base Net Total Unrealized Gain/Loss Coupon Yield Summarized Credit Rating Issuer Current Face Value Original Cost 701,968.75 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESER) 912828QQ6 Treasury, United States Department of 05/31/2018 01/30/2018 700,000.00 700,735.00 (249.38) 2.375 1.743 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESER) 912828UF5 _ US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 12/31/2019 01/30/2018 190,000.00 186,519.14 186,333.00 (483.05) 1.125 2.253 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESER) 9I2828VK3 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 06/30/2018 01/30/2018 705,000.00 704,476.76 704,238.60 (447.46) 1.375 1.796 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 912828QB9 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 03/31/2018 03/14/2018 1,000,000.00 1,000,507.81 --- 1,000,000.00 0.00 2.875 2.834 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 9I2828QB9 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 03/31/2018 01/16/2018 5,365,000.00 5,380,089.06 --- 5,365,000.00 0.00 2.875 2.834 AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 912828UU2 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 03/31/2018 03/20/2018 525,000.00 524,815.43 --- 525,000.00 0.00 0.750 0.747 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 9I2828UU2 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 03/31/2018 03/20/2018 1,700,000.00 1,699,402.34 -- 1,700,000.00 0.00 0.750 0.747 AAA 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESER) 912828K25 US Gov Treasury, United States Department of 04/15/2018 02/27/2018 695,000.00 694,298.44 --- 694,791.50 5.02 0.750 1.428 AAA 116,776,939.19 116,793,278.85 117,185,372.26 475,362.44 38 Page 13 of 32 IOWRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio by Account for quarter ended March 31, 2018 ATTACHMENT 9 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 313385VE3 Agency FHLBanks Office of Finance 3137A7NT3 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 313741CKC4 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 3137AL6V6 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 3137ANMN2 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 3137ASR97 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 31398E2E3 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 31397Q4Q8 Agency CMO Federal National Mortgage Association 31398NG99 Agency CMO Federal National Mortgage Association 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137FBUW4 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137A6AZ5 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137B62L8 Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 313641C2A0 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3136ASPX8 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3138155E8 Agency MBS Federal National Mortgage Association 36225B5Y0 Agency MBS Government National Mortgage Association 161571FW9 Asset Backed Chase Issuance Trust 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 05522RCQ9 Asset Backed BA Credit Card Trust 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 65477PAD3 Asset Backed Nissan Auto Receivables 2014-A Owner Trust 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 02582JGN4 Asset Backed American Express Credit Account Master Trust 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 43814KAD3 Asset Backed Honda Auto Receivables 2015-1 Owner Trust 89236WAC2 Asset Backed Toyota Auto Receivables 2015-A Owner Trust 89236WAD0 Asset Backed Toyota Auto Receivables 2015-A Owner Trust 47787UAE3 Asset Backed John Deere Owner Trust 2015 47787UAD5 Asset Backed John Deere Owner Trust 2015 65477UAC4 Asset Backed Nissan Auto Receivables 161571GY4 Asset Backed Chase Issuance Trust 04/06/2018 03/26/2018 5,100,000.00 5,097,428.75 - 5,099,082.00 250.91 0.000 0.939 AAA O8/25/2020 12/20/2017 83,254.99 83,833.87 --- 83,433.16 (316.79) 2.917 2.468 AAA 09/25/2018 12/04/2017 175,000.00 175,410.16 10/25/2018 12/O1/2017 678,680.04 680,323.73 174,604.50 677,594.16 12/25/2018 12/O1/2017 315,000.00 315,529.10 - 314,165.25 01/25/2022 02/27/2018 535,294.18 523,250.06 01/25/2019 01/03/2018 (524.22) 2.303 2.478 (1,723.57) 2.323 2.344 AAA AAA (1,030.49) 2.220 2.418 AAA 522,318.64 (1,155.26) 1.573 2.765 AAA 90,618.66 92,431.03 - 91,550.22 (429.94) 5.053 2.806 AAA 03/25/2035 01/10/2018 382,264.07 385,489.43 - 384,614.99 (201.25) 4.000 1.696 AAA 10/25/2025 03/21/2018 316,530.29 315,145.47 - 314,906.49 (187.20) 2.000 2.594 AAA 10/25/2019 01/23/2018 830,000.00 830,389.06 - 830,000.00 (714.05) 1.780 2.126 AAA 07/25/2020 01/10/2018 77,934.54 78,567.76 - 78,209.65 (263.31) 3.320 2.436 AAA 12/25/2019 12/20/2017 114,230.11 114,176.57 - 113,847.44 A289.89) 2.075 2.434 AAA 09/25/2019 01/08/2018 224,079.86 223,738.76 - 222,522.50 (1,234.77) 2.171 2.726 AAA 06/25/2019 02/14/2018 355,129.74 354,151.41 - 353,410.91 69.71) 1.785 2.621 AAA 12/O1/2018 12/O1/2017 443,934.67 445,668.79 - 443,677.19 (1,165� 2.640 2.468 AAA 06/ 15 /2019 12/21/2017 04/16/2018 66,544.68 67,293.31 - 66,923.32 (180.05) 5.500 2.748 AAA 1,325,000.00 1,325,765.62 - 1,325,079.50 (45.79) 2.057 1.936 AAA 01/15/2019 03/21/2018 1,100,000.00 1,102,406.25 - 1,102,519.00 202.89 2.157 1.979 AAA 08/17/2020 07/25/2017 245,070.03 244,964.73 - 244,717.13 (300.56) 1.340 2.233 AAA 05/15/2019 01/16/2018 252,000.00 252,885.94 - 252,690.48 (125.74) 2.147 2.014 AAA 11/16/2020 07/24/2017 656,898.60 656,154.45 - 657,286.17 645.02 1.320 1.115 AAA 02/15/2019 11/07/2017 12,279.45 12,269.38 - 12,276.87 1.42 1.120 1.527 AAA 06/15/2020 01/19/2018 548,000.00 546,522.97 - 545,977.88 (1,006.89) 1.520 2.429 AAA 12/15/2021 07/24/2017 747,000.00 747,350.16 - 745,252.02 (1,841.15) 1.650 2.262 AAA 06/17/2019 12/21/2017 38,878.40 38,817.65 - 38,834.85 (15.99) 1.320 2.713 AAA 10/15/2019 11/07/2017 145,629.54 145,379.24 - 145,249.44 (223.65) 1.050 2.436 AAA 04/16/2018 - 360,000.00 359,524.92 - 359,866.80 (53.90) 1.360 2.203 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 161571HA5 Asset Backed Chase Issuance Trust 07/16/2018 01/02/2018 1,500,000.00 1,498,710.94 - 1,496,535.00 (2,761.77) 1.620 2.420 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 654784AD5 Asset Backed Nissan Auto Receivables 2015-C Owner Trust 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 43814LAC3 Asset Backed Honda Auto Receivables 2015-4 Owner Trust 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 05581RAD8 Asset Backed Bmw Vehicle Lease Trust 2016-1 161571HC1 Asset Backed Chase Issuance Trust 412844AE8 Asset Backed Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2014-1 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 05582XAB8 Asset Backed Bmw Vehicle Lease Trust 2016-2 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 05582X4D4 Asset Backed Bmw Vehicle Lease Trust 2016-2 05/15/2020 12/21/2017 675,244.18 673,002.16 - 671,138.70 (2,166.17) 1.370 2.506 AAA 09/23/2019 07/24/2017 812,973.25 811,258.38 - 808,957.16 (3,042.41) 1.230 2.425 AAA 01/22/2019 12/22/2017 688,815.12 687,846.48 - 687,644.13 (672.96) 1.340 2.693 AAA 06/17/2019 --- 763,000.00 758,373.05 - 752,188.29 (7,723.18) 1.370 2.570 AAA 10/15/2021 11/27/2017 355,045.52 354,879.09 - 354,662.07 (268.05) 1.550 1.813 AAA 01/22/2019 12/22/2017 162,453.54 162,225.10 - 162,279.72 (78.85) 1.230 2.808 AAA 09/20/2019 07/27/2017 965,000.00 963,002.14 - 959,287.20 (4,924.68) 1.430 2.717 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 58768MAC5 Asset Backed Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2016-B O8/15/2019 --- 1,594,000.00 1,589,467.81 - 1,586,460.38 (5,376.98) 1.350 2.587 AAA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 90290X4D9 Asset Backed USAA Auto Owner Trust 2005-1 11/16/2020 03/22/2018 758,570.03 756,080.98 - 756,028.83 (54.48) 1.540 2.076 AAA 161571H76 Asset Backed Chase Issuance Trust 01/15/2020 03/23/2018 500,000.00 501,347.66 - 501,345.00 11.63 2.077 2.038 AAA 58769DAD2 Asset Backed Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2017-A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 65479AAD4 Asset Backed Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2017-A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 43813FAA1 Asset Backed Honda Auto Receivables 2017-4 Owner Trust 47788CAA0 Asset Backed Jahn Deere Owner Trust 2018 38141GFM1 Corporate The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 20030NAW I Corporate Comcast Corporation 38141E425 Corporate The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 46625HHL7 Corporate 2Morgan Chase & Co. 03523TAN8 Corporate Anheuser-Busch loBev Worldwide Inc. 38141EA58 Corporate The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 94973VBE6 Corporate Anthem, Inc. 74432QBW4 Corporate Prudential Financial, Inc. 718172BF5 Corporate Philip Morris International Inc. 61746BDM5 Corporate Morgan Stanley 0258MODK2 Corporate American Express Credit Corporation 172967HM6 Corporate Citigroup Inc. 22546Q4N7 Corporate Credit Suisse AG 89114QAS7 Corporate Taranto Dominion Bank 90261XHE5 Corporate UBS AG 40428HPN6 Corporate HSBC USA Inc. 17401QAB7 Corporate Citizens Bank, National Association 46625HKA7 Corporate 2Morgan Chase & Co. 61747YDW2 Corporate Morgan Stanley 780082AA1 Corporate Royal Bank of Canada 172967711 Corporate Citigroup Inc. 06051GFN4 Corporate Bank of America Corporation 00287YAN9 Corporate AbbVie Inc. 446438RN5 Corporate The Huntington National Bank 064159HC3 Corporate The Bank of Nova Scotia 89114QBE7 Corporate Taranto Dominion Bank 69353REV6 Corporate PNC Bank, National Association 07330NAL9 Corporate Branch Banking and Trust Company 49327M2P8 Corporate KeyBank National Association 24422E1'78 Corporate John Deere Capital Corporation 06367TPX2 Corporate Bank of Montreal 14912L6Y2 Corporate Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation 0258MOEE5 Corporate American Express Credit Corporation 375558BQ5 Corporate Gilead Sciences, Inc. 43357MD56 CP Hitachi Capital America Corp. 02360SD47 CP Ameren Corporation 31846V203 MM Fund First American Funds, Inc. 03/16/2020 07/27/2017 965,000.00 965,942.38 - 958,582.75 (6,954.49L 1.790 2.556 AAA 04/15/2020 01/25/2018 850,000.00 846,115.23 - 842,273.50 (4,336.06) 1.910 2.711 AAA 12/21/2018 11/22/2017 725,772.75 725,772.75 - 725,772.75 - 1.430 1.500 AAA 03/15/2019 02/21/2018 2,250,000.00 2,250,000.00 2,250,045.00 45.00 1.950 2.010 AAA 04/O1/2018 10/16/2017 1,000,000.00 1,020,020.00 - 1,000,000.00 - 6.150 5.968 A 05/ 15/2018 12/21/2017 1,500,000.00 1,522,245.00 1,505,715.00 (1,276.29) 5.700 2.587 A 02/15/2019 07/25/2017 1,000,000.00 1,084,540.00 - 1,040,230.00 (8,844.81) 7.500 2.808 A 04/23/2019 07/25/2017 1,000,000.00 1,075,520.00 1,037,580.00 (9,654.28) 6.300 2.691 A 01/15/2020 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,084,440.00 - 1,046,140.00 (16,327.90) 5.375 2.717 A 03/15/2020 07/26/2017 500,000.00 540,800.00 521,350.00 (9,523.90) 5.375 3.110 A 07/15/2018 07/26/2017 1,500,000.00 1,509,105.00 - 1,498,710.00 (4,132.15) 2.300 2.585 A O8/15/2018 07/26/2017 1,500,000.00 1,510,920.00 1,498,770.00 (5,282.45) 2.300 2.514 A 01/15/2019 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,003,040.00 - 994,150.00 (7,535.96) 1.875 2.625 A 01/24/2019 07/25/2017 1,000,000.00 1,009,060.00 - 998,220.00 (6,872.11) 2.500 2.719 A 03/18/2019 07/25/2017 1,000,000.00 1,006,560.00 - 994,760.00 (9,189.16) 2.125 2.677 A 04/08/2019 07/25/2017 1,000,000.00 1,010,110.00 - 999,000.00 (7,239.02) 2.550 2.649 BBB 05/28/2019 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,009,340.00 - 993,630.00 (12,406.09) 2.300 2.860 A 07/02/2019 07/27/2017 1,000,000.00 1,007,670.00 - 993,180.00 (11,920.70) 2.125 2.680 AA 08/14/2019 07/25/2017 850,000.00 857,505.50 - 843,786.50 (11,360.79) 2.375 2.921 A 11/13/2019 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,010,720.00 - 990,910.00 (16,805.94) 2.375 2.953 A 12/04/2019 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,008,450.00 11/04/2019 989,040.00 (17,028.08) 2.450 3.124 A 01/23/2020 07/25/2017 500,000.00 503,005.00 12/23/2019 493,925.00 (8,280.83) 2.250 2.942 A 01/27/2020 07/25/2017 500,000.00 506,130.00 - 496,920.00 (7,641.90) 2.650 2.998 A 02/05/2020 07/26/2017 1,500,000.00 1,497,390.00 - 1,476,690.00 (21,361.66) 1.875 2.743 AAA 02/18/2020 07/25/2017 500,000.00 503,600.00 - 494,555.00 (8,149.49) 2.400 2.998 BBB 04/21/2020 12/04/2017 1,000,000.00 997,850.00 - 985,450.00 (12,691.70) 2.250 2.984 A 05/14/2018 12/21/2017 1,000,000.00 999,780.00 - 999,270.00 (661.94) 1.800 2.383 A 06/30/2018 07/27/2017 1,500,000.00 1,505,700.00 - 1,498,440.00 (3,138.46) 2.000 2.406 A 01/15/2019 01/23/2018 400,000.00 399,504.00 - 397,828.00 (1,768.71) 1.950 2.646 A 01/22/2019 01/23/2018 370,000.00 369,463.50 - 368,124.10 (1,437.57) 1.950 2.584 AA 03/04/2019 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,003,210.00 02/02/2019 993,680.00 (8,144.56) 1.950 2.643 A 05/10/2019 07/27/2017 1,000,000.00 995,340.00 04/10/2019 985,610.00 (11,434.57) 1.450 2.773 A 08/22/2019 07/24/2017 1,000,000.00 995,550.00 - 984,360.00 (12,575.91) 1.600 2.750 A 10/09/2019 07/26/2017 1,125,000.00 1,114,650.00 - 1,099,822.50 (17,872.97) 1.250 2.759 A 12/12/2019 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,005,160.00 - 986,990.00 (16,780.09) 2.100 2.889 A 01/10/2020 07/26/2017 1,000,000.00 1,008,020.00 - 988,650.00 (17,273.78) 2.100 2.758 A 03/03/2020 07/25/2017 500,000.00 503,990.00 02/01/2020 493,000.00 (9,970.91) 2.200 2.953 A 09/20/2019 09/14/2017 595,000.00 595,000.00 - 595,362.95 362.95 2.452 2.512 A 04/05/2018 03/27/2018 700,000.00 699,615.00 - 699,888.00 59.11 0.000 1.155 04/04/2018 03/27/2018 1,495,000.00 1,494,235.89 - 1,494,835.55 122.09 0.000 0.993 AA 03/31/2018 03/26/2018 - 412,243.66 - 412,243.66 - 1.250 1.250 AAA 39 Page 14 of 32 IOWRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio by Account for quarter ended March 31, 2018 240907004 240907004 240907004 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: -1-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue I-15 569203LT7 Muni Salem-Keizer School District #24J LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: -1-15 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: -1-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: -1-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: -1-15 392274A89 Muni 54438CWT5 Muni 92419RAA0 Muni 73358WT46 Muni 419792XC5 Muni 912828UZ1 US Gov 912828VK3 US Gov 9128281{25 US Gov 9128280139 US Gov 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 912828UU2 US Gov Greater Orlando Aviation Authority. Los Angeles Community College District Vermont Housing Finance Agency The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Hawaii, State of Treasury, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of 06/15/2018 10/01/2019 08/01/2018 05/01/2018 11/15/2017 07/26/2017 11/09/2017 01/09/2018 09/15/2018 01/24/2018 04/01/2018 01/31/2018 400,000.00 700,000.00 545,000.00 420,000.00 220,000.00 495,000.00 399,684.00 724,094.00 545,000.00 420,000.00 220,000.00 495,000.00 04/30/2018 01/31/2018 3,000,000.00 2,994,257.81 06/30/2018 03/22/2018 5,000,000.00 4,994,140.63 04/15/2018 02/27/2018 2,500,000.00 2,497,558.59 03/31/2018 01/16/2018 5,365,000.00 5,380,089.06 03/31/2018 03/20/2018 1,700,000.00 1,699,402.34 399,744.00 708,414.00 544,498.60 419,916.00 219,786.60 495,000.00 2,997,750.00 - 4,994,600.00 2,499,250.00 - 5,365,000.00 1,700,000.00 Base Net Total Unrealized (143.82) 1.513 1.813 AA (8,546.47) 3.483 2.662 AA (501.40) 1.620 1.890 AA (84.00) 1.840 2.057 AA (213.40) 2.114 2.326 AA 1.750 1.735 (378.95) 0.625 1.498 (73.30) 1.375 1.796 (6.96) 0.750 1.428 2.875 2.834 0.750 0.747 AAA AAA AAA AAA 83,665,126.22 84,507,601.69 83,948,586.49 (374,891.27) 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 313385VJ2 Agency 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 3137ANMN2 Agency CMO 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 383742C76 Agency CMO 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pq RAMP UP RESERVE 38375JCJ2 Agency CMO 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 3137ASR97 Agency CMO 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pq RAMP UP RESERVE 31392J6N4 Agency CMO 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 3137B8453 Agency CMO 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pq RAMP UP RESERVE 313975E83 Agency CMO 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 3137A5FP4 Agency CMO 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pq RAMP UP RESERVE 31398N21{9 Agency CMO 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 38378CDK0 Agency CMO 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pq RAMP UP RESERVE 38378AWX5 Agency CMO 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 38376THB1 Agency CMO 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 31283K5N4 Agency MBS 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 3136AC7J4 Agency MBS 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pq RAMP UP RESERVE 3137B1U75 FHLBanks Office of Finance Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Government National Mortgage Association Government National Mortgage Association Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Federal National Mortgage Association Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Federal National Mortgage Association Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Federal National Mortgage Association The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T The Government National Mortgage Association Guaranteed REMIC Pass-T Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Federal National Mortgage Association Agency MBS Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 3137AXIIN6 Agency MBS 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 31418ASD1 Agency MBS 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 3137B1UF7 Agency MBS 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 3136A96F0 Agency MBS 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 62888VAA6 CMO 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 31846V203 Mkt Fund 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 912828SA9 TIPS 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 912828UH1 TIPS 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 912828006 US Gov 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 912828UF5 US Gov 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 912828VK3 US Gov 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 9128281(25 US Gov Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Federal National Mortgage Association Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Federal National Mortgage Association NCUA Guaranteed Notes Trust 2011-R1 First American Funds, Inc. Treasury, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of 04/10/2018 03/28/2018 200,000.00 199,881.56 12/25/2018 12/05/2017 1,800,000.00 1,803,697.20 08/16/2037 01/31/2018 12/16/2037 01/31/2018 01/25/2022 02/27/2018 04/25/2023 12/05/2017 02/15/2029 01/31/2018 02/25/2039 01/30/2018 01/15/2021 01/30/2018 11/25/2025 01/31/2018 03/20/2035 01/30/2018 01/20/2036 01/30/2018 10/20/2037 01/30/2018 08/01/2020 12/05/2017 03/25/2023 02/21/2018 01/25/2023 02/27/2018 02/25/2022 01/25/2018 04/01/2023 01/31/2018 09/25/2022 01/25/2018 11/25/2022 02/27/2018 10/07/2020 01/30/2018 03/31/2018 03/29/2018 01/15/2022 01/15/2023 02/05/2018 05/31/2018 01/30/2018 12/31/2019 01/30/2018 06/30/2018 01/30/2018 04/15/2018 02/27/2018 101 07931 39,258.99 39 947.33 673,422A0 172,760.64 103,606.69 39,381.68 39 048.51 732,603.34 170,601.13 199,926.00 1,795,230.00 103 553.13 - 39,517.71 38 979.00 704,911.63 169,932.55 8.00 0.000 1.228 (6,337.22) 2.220 2.418 16.17 4.000 2.842 154.72 5.305 3.185 (86.21) 1.573 2.765 (24,676.87) 5.500 2.840 (684.36) 2.000 2.822 75,816.45 76,242.91 --- 75,949.89 (195.59) 4.000 3.018 84 037.51 67,337.64 155,786.25 218,809.26 8,922.74 898,416.90 61,863.74 120,000.00 91,695.08 99,997.04 45,778.34 75,000.00 53,772.69 317,532.60 80,524.50 700,000.00 190,000.00 705,000.00 695,000.00 84,247.61 67,590.16 157,222A0 220,928.98 8,939.47 918,652.84 60,846.37 117,965.63 90 434.27 99,025.88 45,105.97 72,694.34 53,940.74 20,993.45 315,171.58 79,45359 701,968.75 186,519.14 704,476.76 694,298A4 83 95653 67,357.17 156,529.35 219,857.36 8,93537 916,322.35 60,949.39 118,093.20 89 994.13 98,690.08 44,876.05 72,645.00 53,968.96 20,993.45 314 157.23 79,18337 700,735.00 186,333.00 704,238.60 694,791.50 (280.59) 2.500 2.512 (178.22) 3.500 2.725 (580.99) 3.000 2.401 (972.27) 3.000 2.524 11.75 4.000 0.149 (38,639.84L 5.000 2.677 84.11 2.493 3.069 94.84 2.522 2.901 (460.89) 1.749 2.670 (340.22) 2.000 2.593 (239.87) 1.785 2.676 (99.61) 2.184 3.422 38.38 2.030 2.181 1.250 1.250 (1,124.42) 0.125 0.408 (301.59) 0.125 0.477 (249.38) 2.375 1.743 (483.05) 1.125 2.253 (447.46) 1.375 1.796 5.02 0.750 1.428 AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA 7 771 759.81 7 865 539.70 7 820 608.10 (75 965.64) 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PR I: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PR I: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRI Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PR I: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PR I: Sales Tax 313385VE3 Agency FHLBanks Office of Finance 3137ASR97 Agency CMO Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 31398NG99 Agency CMO 3136A7MK5 Agency MBS 05522RCQ9 Asset Backed 89190AAD2 Asset Backed 65477UAC4 Asset Backed Federal National Mortgage Association Federal National Mortgage Association BA Credit Card Trust Toyota Auto Receivables 2014-C Owner Trust Nissan Auto Receivables 41284CAD6 Asset Backed Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2015-2 161571HA5 Asset Backed Chase Issuance Trust 04/06/2018 03/26/2018 01/25/2022 02/27/2018 10/25/2025 03/21/2018 12/25/2019 03/21/2018 01/15/2019 03/21/2018 04/15/2020 07/19/2017 10/15/2019 11/07/2017 03/16/2020 01/31/2018 07/16/2018 12/19/2017 900,000.00 117,178.82 95 854.26 899,546.25 114,542.30 95 434.90 899,83850 114,338A1 95 362.53 44.28 0.000 0.939 (252.89) 1.573 2.765 (56.68) 2.000 2.594 74,894.90 74,450.22 - 74,361.65 (77.74) 1.801 2.901 325,000.00 873,215.93 48,543.18 31,910.84 360,000.00 325,710.94 873,079.49 48,45936 31,873.45 359,690.63 325,744.25 871,984.69 48,416A8 31,866.17 359,168.40 AAA AAA AAA AAA 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 43814LAC3 Asset Backed 65478QAD0 Asset Backed 58768MAC5 Asset Backed 90290XAD9 Asset Backed 47788CAA0 Asset Backed 06051GEY1 Corporate 89114QAV0 Corporate 21688AAD4 Corporate 172967JQ5 Corporate 61746BDY9 Corporate 94988J5G8 Corporate 06367TPX2 Corporate 0258MOEJ4 Corporate 375558BQ5 Corporate 9AMMF05B2 Mkt Fund 54438CWT5 Muni 912828UZ1 US Gov 912828V1(3 US Gov 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 9128281(25 US Gov 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 912828QB9 US Gov 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 912828UU2 US Gov Honda Auto Receivables 2015-4 Owner Trust Nissan Auto Lease Trust 2016-A Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2016-B USAA Auto Owner Trust 2005-1 John Deere Owner Trust 2018 Bank of America Corporation Toronto Dominion Bank Cooperation Rabobank U.A. Citigroup Inc. Morgan Stanley Wells Fargo Bahr, National Association Bank of Montreal American Express Credit Corporation Gilead Sciences, Inc. U.S. Bank Money Market Account Fund Los Angeles Community College District Treasury, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of Treasury, United States Department of 09/23/2019 11/09/2017 82,381.29 82,178.55 03/15/2019 07/19/2017 1 175 965.10 08/15/2019 03/20/2018 11/16/2020 03/22/2018 03/15/2019 02/21/2018 272,000.00 223,108.83 750,000.00 438.05 270,650.63 222,376.76 750,000.00 01/15/2019 07/19/2017 1,500,000.00 1,518,015.00 11/05/2019 07/20/2017 2,000,000.00 2,019,800.00 01/14/2020 07/20/2017 2,000,000.00 2,016,800.00 04/27/2018 07/20/2017 1,950,000.00 1,957,117.50 02/01/2019 07/20/2017 1,950,000.00 1,981,200.00 12/06/2019 07/19/2017 2,000,000.00 2,014,280.00 12/12/2019 07/19/2017 1,630,000.00 1,637,318.70 81,974.33 - 1 173 801.32 270,713.44 222,361 A2 750,015.00 1,510,200.00 1,983,540.00 - 1,974,280.00 1,950,429.00 - 1,965,931.50 - 1,978,460.00 - 1,608,793.70 05/03/2019 07/19/2017 2,000,000.00 2,006,000.00 04/02/2019 09/20/2019 09/14/2017 03/31/2018 08/01/2018 11/09/2017 340,000.00 275,000.00 340,000.00 144,201.68 275,000.00 04/30/2018 03/14/2018 1,000,000.00 998,554.69 06/30/2018 03/22/2018 04/15/2018 765,000.00 764,103.52 1,075,000.00 1,073,991.21 03/31/2018 03/14/2018 1,000,000.00 1,000,507.81 03/31/2018 03/20/2018 525,000.00 524,815A3 2,002,340.00 340,207.40 144,201.68 274,747.00 - 999,250.00 764,173.80 1,074,677.50 - 1,000,000.00 525,000.00 0.200 0.000 AAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AA AA BBB AA AAA AAA 1.26 0.750 1.428 AAA 0.750 0.747 AAA 25,416,177.67 926,219.35 40 Page 15 of 32 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account Quarter ended March 31, 2018 ATTACHMENT 10 Source Base Base Change In Beginning Base Base Maturities and Net Total Realized Amortization/A Net Unrealized Ending Base Ending Accrued 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 912828QB9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 5,380,089.06 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 20030NAW 1 COMCAST CORP 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 38141EA25 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 38141GFM1 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 46625111M7 7PMORGAN CHASE & CO 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 03523TAN8 ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV NV 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 38141EA58 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 392274A89 GREATER ORLANDO AVIATION AUTH ORLANDO FLA ARPT FAC 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 74432QBW4 PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 94973VBE6 ANTHEM INC 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 446438RN5 HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 61746BDM5 MORGAN STANLEY 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 172967HM6 CDTGROUP INC ,521,285.00 056,840.00 010,520.00 052,800.00 060,810.00 530,165.00 713,797.00 ,502,520.00 ,503,270.00 ,500,570.00 ,002,550.00 1,003,530.00 (15,089.06) (14,300.36) (13,686.21) (10,920.00) (10,875.64) (8,515.53) (3,820.01) (2,744.92) (2,649.60) (2,427.49) (1,578.46) (1,535.72) (1,492.26) (1.281.791 24(1900004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 22546OAN7 CREDIT SUISSE AG (NEW YORK BRANCH) 1.MO 970.00 (1,269.64) (2,923.79) 400.00 (4,344.36) (6,154.47) (4,994.99) (2,638.08) (1,100.401 (2,132.51) (551.54) (2,794.28) (3,037.74) (6.1)58.22) 5,365,000.00 1,505,715.00 1,040,230.00 1,000,000.00 1,037,580.00 1,046,140.00 521,350.00 708,414.00 1,498,770.00 1,498,710.00 1,498,440.00 998,220.00 999,000.00 32,300.00 9,583.33 30,750.00 27,650.00 11,347.22 1,194.44 12,190.50 4,448.33 7,283.33 7,583.33 4,652.78 12,254.17 7.R58.31 993 630.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 40428HPN6 HSBC USA INC (NEW) 1,001,160.00 (1,166.50) (9,083.50) 990,910.00 9,104.17 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 0258MODK2 AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORP 1,000,000.00 (1,006.30) (4,233.70) 994,760.00 767.36 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 89114QAS7 TORONTO-DOMINION BANK 999,890.00 (1,000.57) (5,709.43) 993,180.00 5,253.47 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 17401QAB7 CITIZENS BANK NA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 90261XHE5 UBS AG (STAMFORD BRANCH) 1,000,670.00 850,697.00 (924.44) (910.79) (10,705.56) (5,999.71) 989,040.00 843,786.50 7,962.50 2,635.59 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 31381S5E8 FN 469845 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 14912L6Y2 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP 997,930.00 448,298.51 (2,619.49) (7.89) (828.91) (814.78) (1,165.03) (8,465.22) 443,677.19 988,650.00 1,009.21 4,725.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137AL6V6 FHMS K706 A2 683,745.68 (4, 164.28) (7.05) (792.22) (1,187.98) 677,594.16 1,313.81 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 31397Q4Q8 FNR 10155B JA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 61747YDW2 MORGAN STANLEY 502,260.00 476,156.57 (89,908.55) (715.14) (716.63) (607.00) (201.25) (4,733.00) 384,614.99 496,920.00 1,274.21 2,355.56 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 06367TPX2 BANK OF MONTREAL 997,230.00 (540.05) (9,699.95) 986,990.00 6,358.33 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 69353REV6 PNC BANK NA 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue I-15 7181726E5 PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 998,250.00 998,130.00 (534.47) (525.66) (4,035.53) (3,454.34) 993,680.00 994,150.00 1,462.50 3,958.33 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 31398E2E3 FHMS K003 A4 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 0258MOEE5 AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT CORP 498,485.00 102,000.00 (9,381.34) (170.29) (468.21) (392.53) (429.94) (5,092.47) 91,550.22 493,000.00 381.58 855.56 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 161571FW9 CHAIT 133A 850.431.64 (348.86) (31.78) 850,051.00 825.50 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 1729677/1 CITIGROUP INC 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 46625HKA7 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 499,415.00 499,665.00 (346.00) (309.80) (4,514.00) (5,430.20) 494,555.00 493,925.00 1,433.33 2,125.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 06738EAF2 BARCLAYS PLC 1,000,010.00 (1,000,000.00) (296.00) 286.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 36225B5Y0 GN 781763 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 161571FW9 CHAIT 133 A 107,282.80 475,323.00 (39,670.67) (426.16) (283.95) (273.26) 21.30 (21.24) 66,923.32 475,028.50 305.00 461.31 1240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137ANMN2 FHMS K707 A2 315,352.80 (261.57) (925.99) 314,165.25 582.75 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137AKKC4 FHMS K705 A2 175,232.75 (222.57) (405.68) 174,604.50 335.85 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 06050TLY6 BANK OF AMERICA NA 500,025.00 (500,000.00) (202.32) 177.32 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 58769DAD2 MBALT 17A A3 963,050.70 (157.46) (4,310.49) 958,582.75 767.71 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137A7NT3 FHMS K011 Al 95,945.66 (11,965.09) (81.25) (106.51) (359.65) 83,433.16 202.38 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 45950VKP0 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORP 1,500,105.00 (1,500,000.00) (105.00) 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137A6AZ5 FHMS K010 Al 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 49327M2A7 KEYBANK NA 749,805.00 89,683.09 (750,000.00) (11,025.74) (83.96) (100.42) (94.26) (263.31) 289.26 78,209.65 215.62 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: I-15 05522RCO9 BACCT 141 A 1 102,406.25 (90. 14) 202.89 1,102,519.00 1,120.23 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 47787UAE3 7DOT 15 A4 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 025821GN4 AMXCA 141 A 745,931.79 252,885.94 (85.49) (69.72) (594.28) (125.74) 745,252.02 252,690.48 547.80 255.45 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 65602UML9 The Norinchukin Bank 2,050,068.51 (2,050,000.00) (68.51) 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3136ASPX8 FNA 16M06A AS2 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 31398NG99 FNR 10112H AE 328,603.42 315,145.47 (39,922.58) 119.12 (64.01) (51.78) (530.01) (187.20) 288,205.94 314,906.49 430.79 527.55 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137B6ZL8 FHMS K714 Al 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 05581QAE8 BMWLT 152 A4 140,709.45 964,536.80 (26,504.67) (965,000.00) 13.00 (82.78) (44.73) 0.4,08) (325.61) 590.05 113,847.44 197.52 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3136ASPX8 FNA 16M06A AS2 74,367.96 (9,032.26) 23.89 (14.92) (139.70) 65,204.97 97.46 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 161571H16 CHAIT 171 A 501,347.06 (14.29) 11.63 501,345.00 490.31 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 05581QAE8 BMWLT 152 A4 464,862.44 (464,989.58) 130.67 (3.53) 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 22549LGU3 Credit Suisse AG 1,999,320.00 (2,000,000.00) (0.36) 680.36 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 31846V203 FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG;Y 274,118.57 175,024,008.63 (174,885,883.54) 412,243.66 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 47770VAS9 JOBSOHIO BEVERAGE SYS OHIO STATEWIDE LIQUOR PROFIT 550,000.00 (550,000.00) 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 375558BQ5 GILEAD SCIENCES INC 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 06371ETS6 Bank of Montreal 595,749.70 1,999,540.00 (2,000,000.00) (386.75) 595,362.95 486.26 460.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 54438CWT5 IRS ANGELES CALIF CMNTY COLLEGE DIST 544,782.00 (283.40) 544,498.60 1,471.50 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 06539RLL9 The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd 1,599,840.00 (1,600,000.00) 160.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 65602UYN2 The Norinchukin Bank 1,099,879.00 (1,100,000.00) 121.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 60700AMC5 Mizuho Bank, Ltd. 1,799,730.00 (1,800,000.00) 270.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 89113XNF7 Toronto Dominion Bank 1,799,802.00 (1,800,000.00) 198.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 60683BCS0 Mitsubishi UFJ Trust & Banking Corp 1,399,776.00 (1,400,000.00) 224.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 43813FAA1 HAROT 174 Al 1,601,703.46 (875,914.70) (0.00) (16.02) 725,772.75 317.12 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 92419RAA0 VERMONT HSG FIN AGY PPTY TRANSFER TAX REV 420,000.00 (84.00) 419,916.00 1,416.80 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 73358WT46 PORT AUTHN Y&N1 220,000.00 (213.40) 219,786.60 206.70 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 419792XC5 HAWAII ST 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 47788CAA0 JDOT 2018 Al 495,000.00 2,250,000.00 45.00 495,000.00 2,250,045.00 1,130.94 3,778.13 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 90290XAD9 USAOT 151 A4 756,080.98 2.33 (54.48) 756,028.83 519.20 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 161571GY4 CHAIT 155 A 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 89236WAC2 TAOT 15A A3 51,913.84 12,985.78 (39,673.36) 11.13 19.87 12.52 (1.72) 12,995.19 4.00 12,276.87 7.86 6.11 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 161571HC1 CHAIT 162A 12,796.88 14.66 4.25 12,815.79 7.92 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3136AK2A0 FNA 14M70 AS2 224,668.64 (931.31) 1.40 18.55 (1,234.77) 222,522.50 405.46 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 53944VAC3 LLOYDS BANK PLC 999,970.00 (1,000.000.00) 27.75 2.25 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 41284AAE8 HDMOT 141 A4 65477PAD3 NAROT 14A A4 47787UAD5 7DOT 15 A3 064159HC3 BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 89114QBE7 TORONTO-DOMINION BANK 449,649.00 - 501,318.75 - 90,321.30 - 399,504.00 369,463.50 (94,954.49) (256,926.41) (51,527.89) 36.16 69.27 65.27 37.25 39.45 49.50 9231 98.17 (105.85) 216.07 (73.32) (1,768.71) (1,437.57) 354,662.07 244,717.13 38,834.85 397,828.00 368,124.10 244.59 145.95 22.81 1,646.67 1,382.88 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 313313TS7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 3,099,900.97 (3,100,000.00) 99.03 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 65477UAC4 NAROT 15A A3 243,368.91 (98,217.32) 132.76 101.72 (136.63) 145,249.44 67.96 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 313385UH7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 2,999,883.33 - (3,000,000.00) 116.67 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 31315LTS7 FEDERAL AGRICULTURAL MORTGAGE CORP 3,749,879.17 - (3,750,000.00) 120.83 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 569203LT7 MARION & POLK CNTYS ORE SCH DIST NO 241 SALEM-KEIZ 399,788.00 134.61 (178.61) 399,744.00 1,781.98 41 Page 16 of 32 IMFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 240907004 LC RCTC Toll Revenue: -1 15 240907004 LC RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC RCTC Toll Revenue: -1 15 240907004 LC RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC RCTC Toll Revenue: -1 15 240907004 LC RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 00287YAN9 ABBVIE INC 31381S5E8 FN 469845 43814KAD3 HAROT 151 A4 02360SA32 Ameren Corporation 05582XAB8 BMWLT 162 A2 43357MD56 Hitachi Capital America Corp 3137ASR97 FHMS K020 Al 06051GFN4 BANK OF AMERICA CORP 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account Quarter ended March 31, 2018 Beginning Base 999,510.00 449,327.34 886,325.88 849,926.00 359,906.34 1,000,700.00 (449,169.06) 0.00 699,615.00 523,250.06 Base Maturities and 850,000.00) (230,101.40) (197,910.47) Base Base Change In Net Total Realized Amortization/A Net Unrealized Ending Base Ending Accrued • 02.4 88.88 142.45 165.21 191.43 200.42 212.28 213.89 223.84 226.32 82.45) (323.49) 767.85 (126.42) (117.30) 59.11 (1,155.26) (15,476.32) ( 999,270.00 657.286.17 162,279.72 699,888.00 522,318.64 985,450.00 6,850.00 385.38 61.06 01. 10,000.0680 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 650035S82 NEW YORK ST URBAN DEV CORP REV 780082AA1 ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 43814LAC3 HAROT 154 A3 944,508.60 1,487,565.00 1,117,103.25 (945,000.00) (308,121.11) 411.68 239.45 255.67 296.54 251.95 (11,130.67) (733.20) 1,476,690.00 808,957.16 4,375.00 277.77 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 313385UG9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 7,999,700.00 (8,000,000.00) 300.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 04056BC57 ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO 1,684,695.30 (1,685,000.00) 304.70 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 22533UAP8 Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank 1,599,684.45 (1,600,000.00) 315.55 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3137FBUW4 FHMS KPO4 AG2 830,389.06 324.99 (714.05) 830,000.00 287.22 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 65478AAD5 NAROT 15C A3 849,437.91 (176,912.11) 562.30 332.78 (2,282.19) 671,138.70 411.15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 313385TH9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 2,499,647.23 (2,500,000.00) 352.77 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 670211(AN9 NSTAR Electric Company 1,599,618.67 (1,600,000.00) 381.33 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 161571GY4 CHAIT 155 A 346,539.14 384.65 (52.18) 346,871.61 209.74 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 97684HA50 Wisconsin Public Service Corporation 1,999,740.00 (2,000,000.00) 422.22 (162.22) 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 459515RN4 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORP 1,847,558.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 05582XAD4 BMWLT 162 A3 960,908.40 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 89236WAD0 TAOT 15A A4 (1,850,000.00) 437.73 445.69 546,522.97 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 02360SD47 Ameren Corporation 1,494,235.89 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 58768MAC5 MBALT 16B A3 996,600.00 461.80 2,004.27 (2,066.89) 959,287.20 421.65 (1,006.89) 477.57 122.09 482.80 (1,812.80) 545,977.88 370.20 1,494,835.55 995,270.00 600.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 313385UA2 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 13,899,513.50 (13,900,000.00) 486.50 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 65479AAD4 NALT 17A A3 846,115.23 494.33 (4,336.06) 842,273.50 721.56 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 97684HAW1 Wisconsin Public Service Corporation 1,599,502.22 (1,600,000.00) 497.78 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 66522UBC6 Northern Illinois Gas Company 1,599,502.22 (1,600,000.00) 497.78 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 912828VK3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4,994,140.63 532.67 (73.30) 4,994,600.00 17,282.46 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 49327M2P8 KEYBANK NA 989,070.00 532.89 (5,242.89) 984,360.00 1,733.33 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 313385115 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 2,999,46646 (3,000,000.00) 533.34 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 313385UE4 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 15,999,422.22 (16,000,000.00) 577.78 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 161571HA5 CHAIT 157 A 1,498,710.94 585.83 (2,761.77) 1,496,535.00 1,080.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 161571HC1 CHAIT 162A 742,800.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 912828U1J2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1,699,402.34 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 313385UF1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 15,999,400.00 591.89 (4,019.39) 597.66 (16,000,000.00) 600.00 739,372.50 456.67 1,700,000.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 313385UL8 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 5,499,381.25 (5,500,000.00) 618.75 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 912828H37 UNITED STATES TREASURY 05581RAD8 BMWLT 161 A3 4,999,400.00 1,229,408.11 (5,000,000.00) (542,217.96) 582.50 621.45 625.69 (21.45) (754.20) 687,644.13 282.03 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 07330NAL9 BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST CO 990,530.00 655.65 (5,575.65) 985,610.00 5,679.17 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 313385TW6 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 71112KA84 The Peoples Gas Light And Coke Company 1,999,480.00 6,699,302.06 (6,700,000.00) (2,000,000.00) 697.94 700.00 (180.00) 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 58768MAC5 MBALT 16B A3 591,980.40 845.81 (1,635.83) 591,190.38 356.40 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 92780KC55 Virginia Electric and Power Company 1,799,130.01 (1,800,000.00) 869.99 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 06538CB59 The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd 1,599,091.55 (1,600,000.00) 908.45 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 43357MAA8 Hitachi Capital America Corp. 1,999,300.00 (2,000,000.00) 925.00 (225.00) 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 63743DBD2 National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corpo 1,599,066.67 (1,600,000.00) 933.33 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 69511KAP7 PacifiCory 1,598,985.78 (1,600,000.00) 1,014.22 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 912828UR9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1,128,937.80 (1,130,000.00) 1,040.07 22.13 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 93884FB92 Washington Gas Light Company 1,598,933.33 (1,600,000.00) 1,066.67 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 92780KAG3 Virginia Electric and Power Company 1,848,871.50 (1,850,000.00) 1,102.29 26.21 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 24422E1'18 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 1,108,136.25 1,167.18 (9,480.93) 1,099,822.50 6.718.75 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 313385 VE3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 5,097,428.75 1,402.34 250.91 5,099,082.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3I3385UD6 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 13,898,528.92 (13,900,000.00) 1,471.08 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 9128281{25 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2,497,558.59 1,698.37 (6.96) 2,499,250.00 8,653.85 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 0236051380 Ameren Corporation 1,597,760.00 (1,600,000.00) 2,240.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 313385UM6 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 9,997,733.30 (10,000,000.00) 2,266.70 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 26055BBN3 The Dow Chemical Company 1,597,699.10 (1,600,000.00) 2,300.90 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 43357MB90 Hitachi Capital America Corp. 1,597,680.00 (1,600,000.00) 2,320.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 3I3385RX6 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4,497,570.00 (4,500,000.00) 2,530.14 (100.14) 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 459053SZ8 INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM 2,597,445.50 (2,600,000.00) 2,554.50 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 54866HCE0 Lowe's Companies, Inc. 1,997,400.00 (2,000,000.00) 2,600.00 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 912828UR9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3,382,355.47 (3,385,000.00) 2,644.53 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 23337UAV 1 DTE Gas Company 1,997,640.00 (2,000,000.00) 3,033.33 (673.33) 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 78355BCC4 Ryder System, Inc. 2,596,845.34 (2,600,000.00) 3,154.66 240907004 LC-RCTC Toll Revenue: - I-15 912828UZ1 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2,994,257.81 90,093,171.73 354,727,111.51 (174,885,883.54) (181,195,000.00) (4,547,592.78) 3,871.14 884.65 (42,628.04) (378.95) 2,997,750.00 7,872.93 (201,477.03) 83,948,586.49 320,229.34 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESERVE 31283K5N4 FH G11753 1,104,474.22 (182,726.24) (12,388.06) (7,490.26) 14,45249 916,322.35 3,743.40 240907020 RCTC 1-15 PO RAMP UP RESERVE 3139216N4 FNR 0323B EQ 771,014.16 (57,784.84) (4,948.77) (2,535.82) (833.10) 704,911.63 3,086.52 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESERVE 3137ANMN2 FHMS K707 A2 1,802,016.00 (1,670.85) (5,115.15) 1,795,230.00 3,330.00 240907020 RCTC 1-15 PO RAMP UP RESERVE 9I2828QQ6 UNITED STATES TREASURY 701,968.75 (984.38) (249.38) 700,735.00 5,572.12 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESERVE 38378CDK0 GNR 11169G AK 163,833.04 (6,550.26) (58.32) (114.12) (580.99) 156,529.35 389.47 240907020 RCTC 1-15 PO RAMP UP RESERVE 38378AWX5 GNR 11157E QA 228,499.55 (7,497.94) (70.73) (101.26) (972.27) 219,857.36 547.02 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESERVE 31397SE83 FNR 1136C PA 78,218.97 (1,965.00) (9.77) (98.73) (195.59) 75,949.89 252.72 240907020 RCTC 1-15 PO RAMP UP RESERVE 383742C76 GNR 0832B PA 105,466.40 (1,814.35) (44.88) (70.22) 16.17 103,553.13 336.93 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESERVE 31398N2K9 FNR 10123B DL 82,41245 (14,766.52) (51.28) (58.86) (178.22) 67,357.17 196.40 240907020 RCTC 1-15 PO RAMP UP RESERVE 3137A6TB8 FHR 3812F LV 25,470.19 (25,446.33) (23.86) 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESERVE 383751C12 GNR 0668 D 40,705.20 (1,319.39) (3.80) (19.02) 154.72 39,517.71 173.56 240907020 RCTC 1-15 PO RAMP UP RESERVE 38376THB1 GNR 102H WP 13,606.85 (4,658.64) (5.53) (18.67) 11.75 8,935.77 29.74 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESERVE 62888VAA6 NGN 10R11A 56,477.21 - - (2,528.57) (7.75) (10.31) 38.38 53,968.96 75.79 240907020 RCTC 1-15 PO RAMP UP RESERVE 3I37A5FP4 FHR 3791E DA 88,355.02 - - (4,097.16) (10.73) (9.70) (280.59) 83,956.83 175.08 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pp RAMP UP RESERVE 31846V203 FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG;Y 20,993.45 240907020 RCTC 1-15 Pij RAMP UP RESERVE 240907020 RCTC 1-15 PO RAMP UP RESERVE 42 Page 17 of 32 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account Quarter ended March 31, 2018 Source Beginning Base Base Maturities and Base Base Change In Net Total Realized Amortization/A Net Unrealized Ending Base Ending Accrued 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pq RAMP UP RESERVE 313313TS7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 3137B1UF7 FHMS K027 Al 240907020 RCTC1-15 Pt1 RAMP UP RESERVE 3137884S3 FHR 4305A CT 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 3137ASR97 FHMS K020 Al 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pt1 RAMP UP RESERVE 3136AC7J4 FNA 13M62A 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 3137AXHN6 FHMS K024 Al 240907020 RCTC 1-15 Pt1 RAMP UP RESERVE 3137B1U75 FHMS KS01 A2 199,993.61 46,810.70 176,335.04 39,048.51 64,531.54 94,197.69 117,965.63 (200,000.00) (1,730.14) (5,806.49) (3,746.78) (3,815.89) 25.56 72.39 61.51 52.80 6.39 9.80 15.97 16.70 19.01 20.42 32.73 (239.87) (684.36) (86.21) 84.11 (460.89) 94.84 44,876.05 169,932.55 38,979.00 60,949.39 89,994.13 118,093.20 68.10 287.93 52.36 128.53 133.65 252.20 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 313385V12 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 199,881.56 36.44 8.00 199,926.00 240907020 RCTC 1-15 Pt1 RAMP UP RESERVE 3136A96F0 FNA 12M17 A2 72,694.34 50.27 (99.61) 72,645.00 136.50 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 912828UR9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 74,929.50 (75,000.00) 64.45 6.05 240907020 RCTC 1-15 Pt1 RAMP UP RESERVE 912828K25 UNITED STATES TREASURY 109,892.58 74.73 (0.31) 109,967.00 380.77 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 912828VK3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 704,476.76 209.30 (447.46) 704,238.60 2,436.83 240907020 RCTC 1-15 Pt1 RAMP UP RESERVE 912828UR9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 624,682.62 (625,000.00) 317.38 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 912828H37 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2,499,700.00 (149,994.14) (7,350,000.00) 4.92 348.67 (59.45) 240907020 RCTC 1-15 Pt1 RAMP UP RESERVE 912828UF5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 392,671.88 (206,210.16) (15.24) 369.57 (483.05) 186,333.00 537.33 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 912828SA9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 75,564.65 387.15 (120.74) 75,831.06 20.11 240907020 RCTC 1-15 Pt1 RAMP UP RESERVE 912828SA9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 75,469.29 390.55 (28.79) 75,831.06 20.11 240907020 RCTC I-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 9128281{25 UNITED STATES TREASURY 584,405.86 413.31 5.33 584,824.50 2,025.00 240907020 RCTC 1-15 Pt1 RAMP UP RESERVE 912828UH1 UNITED STATES TREASURY 79,068.39 416.97 (301.59) 79,183.77 21.13 240907020 RCTC I-15 Pn RAMP UP RESERVE 912828U17 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1,499,580.00 (1,500,000.00) 476.08 (56.08) 240907020 RCTC 1-15 Prj RAMP UP RESERVE 912828SA9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 7,861,709.68 162,655.64 9,288,284.57 814.36 162,495.12 24,619.06 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ : Sales Tax 61746BDY9 MORGAN STANLEY 1,972,093.50 (5,059.46) (1, 102.54) 1,965,93150 10,061.76 245490001 • 11 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales T. LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ• Sales T. LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ Sales T. 1729 a•l BANK OF AMERICA CORP INCCITIGROUP TORONTO-DOMINION BANK 1 • 1 2.001.200.00 (2.142.701 752.50 164.86 1 1.983.540.00 1510.200.00 •1 8,228.96 29.75 :1 I11 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 21688AAD4 COOPERATIEVE RABOBANK UA(NEW YORK BRANCH) 1,997,980.00 (1,670.36) (22,029.64) 1,974,280.00 9,625.00 245490001 • 11 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales T. LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales T. LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ Sales T. 949881508 WELLS BANK NA AMERICAN CORP BANK ,, 1 2,003,860.00 •1 (753.571 :108 (15.937.631 : •I 11 2,002,340.00 1.608.793.70 13,736.11 6,468.55 10.364.08 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 912828QB9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1,000,507.81 (507.81) 1000 000 00 245490001 • 11 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales T. LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales T. LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ Sales T. 055810AE8 05522RCO9 1® 2,354,175.75 325.710.94 (2,355.000.00) 1.227.92 1,009.41 59.94 325.744.25 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 31398NG99 FNR 10112H AE 95,434.90 (15.68) (56.68) 95,362.53 159.76 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 3136A7MK5 FNA 12M8 AQ3 74,450.22 (10.83) (77.74) 74,361.65 112.38 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 9AMMF05B2 U.S. BANK MONEY MARKET ACCOUNT FUND 84,991.61 65,556,419.11 (65,497,209.04) 144,201.68 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 47770VAS9 JOBSOHIO BEVERAGE SYS OHIO STATEWIDE LIQUOR PROFIT 275,000.00 (275.000.00) 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 375558BQ5 GILEAD SCIENCES INC 340,428.40 (221.00) 340,207.40 277.87 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 54438CWT5 LOS ANGELES CALIF CMNTY COI I FL'E DIST 274,890.00 (143.00) 274,747.00 742.50 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 60700AMC5 Mizuho Bank, Ltd. 799,880.00 (800,000.00) 120.00 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 47788CAA0 TOOT 2018 Al 750.000.00 15.00 750,015.00 1,259.38 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 43814JAC8 HAROT 144 A3 2,500.72 (2,501.11) (0.01) 0.42 (0.02) 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 90290XAD9 USAOT 151 A4 222.376.76 0.68 (16.03) 222,361.42 152.71 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 912828K25 UNITED STATES TREASURY 74,967.77 5.69 4.04 74.977.50 259.62 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 41284CAD6 HDMOT 152 A3 51.691.44 (19,841.241 21.38 12.30 (17.71) 31,866.17 18.44 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 89190AAD2 TAOT 14C A4 1,460,210.52 (588,880.68) 42.66 24.58 587.62 871,984.69 558.86 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 02361LAS1 Ameren Illinois Comoanv 573.974.49 (574.000.00) 25.51 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 65477UAC4 NAROT 15A A3 81,122.97 (32,739.11) 44.25 33.91 (45.54) 48,416.48 22.65 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 313385UH7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 999.961.11 (1,000.000.00) 38.89 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 31315LTS7 FEDERAL AGRICULTURAL MORTGAGE CORP 1,249,959.72 (1,250,000.00) 40.28 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 43814LAC3 HAROT 154 A3 113,199.80 (31.222.94) 65.44 46.76 (114.73) 81,974.33 28.15 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 3137ASR97 FHMS K020 Al 114,542.30 49.00 (252.89) 114,338.41 153.60 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 66522UB51 Northern Illinois Gas Company 524.930.00 (525.000.00) 70.00 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 02361LB50 Ameren Elinois ComPanv 524,930.00 (525,000.00) 70.00 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 912828VK3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 764.103.52 81.50 (11.22) 764,173.80 2,644.22 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 58768MAC5 MBALT 16B A3 270,650.63 86.98 (24.17) 270,713.44 163.20 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 04056BCS7 ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO 509.907.78 (510.000.00) 92.22 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 71112KA43 The Peoples Gas Light And Coke ComPww 599,946.00 (600,000.00) 92.50 (38.50) 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 3139216N4 FNR 0323B EQ 20,777.06 1,395.22 98.13 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 00280PAX3 Abbey National Treasury Services PLC 499,877.50 (500,000.00) 122.50 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 313313TS7 FEDERAL FARM CREDO' BANKS 3.899.875.42 (3.900.000.00) 124.58 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 161571HA5 CHAIT 157 A 359,712.00 135.34 (678.94) 359.168.40 259.20 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 650035S82 NEW YORK ST URBAN DEV CORP REV 539,719.20 (540.000.00) 136.83 143.97 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRI: Sales Tax 31283K5N4 FH G11753 53,291.82 1,717.12 137.63 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 313385UA2 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4,999,825.00 (5.000.000.00) 175.00 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 912828UU2 UNITED STATES TREASURY 524,815.43 184.57 525,000.00 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tex 74433HB29 Prudential Funding LLC 599,813.33 (600.000.00) 186.67 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 313385UG9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4,999,812.50 (5,000,000.00) 187.50 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 06538CB26 The Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ. Ltd 599,809.33 (600.000.00) 190.67 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 313385SU1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 799,800.89 (800,000.00) 199.11 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 313385SM9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 999,786.67 (1,000.000.00) 213.33 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 313589TW3 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 2,085,786.19 (2,086,000.001 213.81 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 97684HA84 Wisconsin Public Service Corporation 599,844.00 (600.000.00) 215.84 (59.84) 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 313385UE4 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 5,999,783.33 (6,000,000.001 216.67 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 313385UF1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 5.999,775.00 (6.000.000.00) 225.00 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 313385 VE3 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 899,546.25 247.47 44.28 899.838.00 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 161571HG2 CHAIT 166 A 1,999,200.00 (2.000,000.001 17.75 248.53 533.72 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 92780KC55 Virginia Electric and Power ComPanv 524,746.25 (525,000.00) 253.75 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 313385TH9 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 1,999.717.78 (2,000.000.00) 282.22 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 313385TW6 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 313385SW7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 2,999,687.49 1,299.678.98 (3,000,000.00) (1,300.000.00) 312.51 321.02 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 313385UL8 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 2.999,662.50 (3,000,000.00) 337.50 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 313385T15 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 1,999.644.4.4 - (2,000.000.00) - - 355.56 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 78355BCC4 Ryder System, Inc. 399,514.67 - (400,000.00) - - 485.33 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 313385SP2 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 1,999.500.28 - (2,000.000.00) - - 499.72 43 Page 18 of 32 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Transaction Report by Account Quarter ended March 31, 2018 Source Beginning Base Base Base Change In Base Maturities and Net Total Realized Amortization/A Net Unrealized Ending Base Ending Accrued 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales Tax 313385UD6 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PM Sales Tax 912828UZ1 UNITED STATES TREASURY 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales T 02360SAK4 Ameren Corporation. 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 23337UAS8 DTE Gas Company 4,999,470.83 (5,000,000.00) 998,554.69 599.556.00 (600.000.001 499,475.00 (500,000.00) 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales T 912828K25 UNITED STATES TREASURY 999,023.44 529.17 553.52 555.00 659.72 679.35 141.79 (111.00) (134.72) (2.79) 999,250.00 2,624.31 999,700.00 3,461.54 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales T 1245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRJ: Sales T 912828UR9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 43157MB25 Hitachi C vital America C 1,999,062.50 649.011.12 (2,000,000.00) (650.000.00) 937.50 968.68 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 54866HCE0 Lowe's Companies, Inc. 245490001 LC-RCTC 2017 PRE Sales Tax 65478QAD0 NALT 16A A3 1,997,820.00 30,043,293.86 998,700.00 131,458,820.51 (65,497,209.04) (1,000,000.00) (824,034.90) (62,660,000.001 (7,780,151.10) 1,300.00 764,181.12 86,505.14 767,169.59 81,794.74 (850,670.03) 1,173,801.32 (920,123.911 25,416,177.67 778.75 99,372.30 127,998,175.26 495,474,216.58 (244,609,608.75) (248,605,000.001 (12,656,613.45) 750,682.02 30,455.25 (1,119,517.681 117,185,372.26 444,220.70 44 Page 19 of 32 IOWRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Summary of Investments for quarter ended March 31, 2018 ATTACHMENT 11 C redit Rating 60.000.000 150,000,000 Q 40,000.000 m 3 30,000.000 20, 000.000 10, 000.000 m 0 AAA AA+ ■ AA AA- A+ BBB+ A-1+ A-2 Otr,r Asset Class Morley Market Fonda 1a"4%) Leah ;7.3546) Fixed Income 192_15%) Industry Group Other 124-774a} Commercial MBS 15.5%) Credit Card ASS (5.50%) Auto Lease �gans (5-64%) Caah (7.84%) Banks (xz-aa%1 "'Sovereign (1IMM) L7hreramed Finan Sere (9,57%) Other ;9.15%) MUNI {2.n1 Y4 FHLMC CMO (4.15%) - AGCYDISC- I5.25%) CASH 17.35%) US GOV 113.30 / y Security Type ABS (1 9"81 %) -- COBP (36.4%) Market Sector Other 13"88%) Agency Ipp 15.24%1. ll Industrial" 17-78 %) Cash 17.84%) Mortgage Backed 18.43%1 Government (13.94% •-Financial (33.53%) Asset Backed 119.51%) 45 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Sales Tax Revenue Fund Summary of Investments for quarter ended March 31, 2018 ATTACHMENT 12 l 0,QO0.000 Q 6,000,000 a,aoo,000 cn m 2,000,000 m m 0 AA. Credit Rating Industry Group Omer (6.48%) Equipment Hacked Lean /2.94%) Automobile ABS' J (4.%) Auto Leese Loans I5.55%) Cash (9.47%) sovereign (14.137%) Banks 143.37%) Olvargltled Fl nan Sery (17.59%) Security Type Other (1-132%) MUNI 11.07%) AGCY DISC [3.52%) CASH (5.69%) YANKEE I6-34%) US GOV 01.15%) ABS (1821 %) CORP 153.97%) Market Sector other (1.G7%) Mortgage BaCRvtl I ndustriai" (1.33%). Agency (3.52%) Cash [8A5%) Government (11.15%) Asset Backed el 5,21%1 Financial 158.98%) 46 OFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTACHMENT 13 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Sales Tax 115 ELP Project Revenue Fund Summary of Investments for quarter ended March 31, 2018 Credit Rating 50,Q00.000 2 40,000,000 Q m 30,000.000 a 7 _y 20,000,0130 m a, 10,004,000 co 0 AAA AA+ s AA AA A- �1 BBB. A•1-, A Asset Class Money market Funds (0-4-0%) Caen 1e.47%) Fixed Income (91.03%) Industry Group Other (36.60%) Automobile ABS (5,41I` ) Auto Lease Leans 16.16%) 1 Crecilt Card ABS (6.6%) Diversified Finan Sery (0.03%) Ranks t, 8.53%} Cash (8.96%1 Sovereign (18.52%) Security Type Omar (6.61%) FNLMC CMO 13.10%) MUNI 13.32%] AGCY DISC (0.04%) CASH (8.47%) US GOV 112.47%) ASS a7%] "CORP 137.38%j Market Sector Other (5.09%) Mortgage Backed (5.54%1_ Agency--� (6.04%) Cash (8.90%) Industrial (10A3%) Government (12A7%) Asset Backed (22.47 411 47 INFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2017 Financing STAMP Portfolio Ramp Up Fund Summary of Investments for quarter ended March 31, 2018 ATTACHMENT 14 Credit Rating Base Market Value + Accrued 10,000, 000 8,000, 000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 I AAA A-1+ MMI Asset Class Cash • Manny Ma115.111 Funda 10.26`.5) F1xed Income (99.73%) Industry Group Cash � Agency Cutlet PAC CIAO� (o.97%) FNMA Collates 11.2%) FOL AIC Collateral (11.72%) Agency Collet CHO 120.069S4 Gc+ltrnerclal NIBS (20.86%). . Severs lgll (3e_eagal Security Type TIPS 1s.ot GNMA CM (B.75%) Other (8.47%) FHLMC 13a%} %) 0 0 FNMA CMO (10.88%) FGLMC (11.725L) •'US GOV (2927%) FHLMC CMO (28-8B°A) Market Sector Government (34.29'k) Mortgage BnClted (62.1313141 48 PERIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio b Investment Cate • o for Quarter ended March 31, 2018 ATTACHMENT 15 Account Number: 001050990415 Name: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMM CUSIP Security Type Category Issuer Next Call Base Market Unrealized Accrued Credit Final Maturity Trade Date Date Original Cost Value Gain/Loss Income Coupon Yield Rating 02582JHG8 Asset -Backed AMERICAN EXPRESS 1.640 % 12/15/21 12/15/2021 05/30/2017 419,932.72 415,913.40 -4,019.32 306.13 1.64 1.656247791 AAA V3r033600 Lreull mn-LC IIVI. L.LDV%a L/L3/LI VL/L3/LVLI UL/L3/LV10 VI/LJ/LVLI wyD,D/D.VV LI Z,w8V.VV J,1 0.VV 1,10i.ou C.CD L.LaaLDyf VL rw* 037833CS7 Credit APPLE INC 1.800% 5/11/20 05/11/2020 05/11/2017 484,505.30 477,196.35 -7,308.95 3,395.00 1.8 1.833535362 AA+ 053015AD5 Credit AUTOMATIC DATA 2.250% 9/15/20 09/15/2020 09/15/2015 08/15/2020 455,017.27 444,577.50 -10,439.77 450.00 2.25 2.275048282 AA 05582QAD9 Asset -Backed BMW VEHICLE OWNER 1.160% 11/25/20 11/25/2020 07/20/2016 454,997.95 450,609.25 -4,388.70 87.97 1.16 1.170334050 N/A 05584PAD9 Asset -Backed BMW VEHICLE LEASE 2.070% 10/20/20 10/20/2020 10/25/2017 _ 99,999.92 98,971.00 -1,028.92 63.25 2.07 2.093277243 N/A 06406FAA1 Credit BANK OF NY MTN 2.500% 4/15/21 04/15/2021 02/19/2016 03/15/2021 759,301.27 735,390.00 -23,911.27 8,645.83 2.5 2.545487868 A 06406HBM0 Credit BANK NY MELLON MTN 5.450% 5/15/19 05/15/2019 05/12/2009 _ 253,819.61 249,223.70 -4,595.91 4,982.51 5.45 5.297073488 A 084664CK5 Credit BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY 1.300% 8/15/19 08/15/2019 08/15/2016 159,844.80 157,100.80 -2,744.00 265.78 1.3 1.322414933 AA 084670BQ0 Credit BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY 2.200% 3/15/21 03/15/2021 03/15/2016 02/15/2021 466,436.01 464,947.65 -1,488.36 460.53 2.2 2.235658757 AA 13063BFS6 Taxable Muni CALIFORNIA ST BUILD 6.650% 3/01/22 03/01/2022 04/01/2010 F 489,585.68 473,441.50 -16,144.18 2,355.21 6.65 5.994555321 AA- 13063C4V9 Taxable Muni CALIFORNIA ST 1.050% 11/01/18 11/01/2018 11/03/2016 149,887.50 149,050.50 -837.00 656.25 1.05 1.056008689 AA- 13063DAB4 Taxable Muni CALIFORNIA ST HIGH 1.593% 4/01/19 04/01/2019 04/27/2017 350,024.49 347,767.00 -2,257.49 2,787.75 1.59 1.604779078 AA- 13066YTY5 Taxable Muni CALIFORNIA ST DEPT 1.713% 5/01/21 05/01/2021 09/28/2016 107,199.40 105,675.76 -1,523.64 772.92 1.71 1.764505928 AA 13077CT38 Taxable Muni CALIFORNIA ST 1.982% 11/01/19 11/01/2019 08/05/2015 130,399.67 128,856.00 -1,543.67 1,073.58 1.98 1.995549783 AA- 161571HC1 Asset -Backed CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST 1.370% 6/15/21 06/15/2021 06/17/2016 750,040.12 739,372.50 -10,667.62 456.67 1.37 1.390030337 AAA 166764AN0 Credit CHEVRON CORP 2.193% 11/15/19 11/15/2019 11/18/2014 503,581.05 496,960.00 -6,621.05 4,142.33 2.19 2.211733382 AA- 166764AU4 Credit CHEVRON CORP 2.0398% 3/03/22 03/03/2022 03/03/2015 504,977.39 505,575.00 597.61 821.58 2.55 2.020279302 AA- 17275RAE2 Credit CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.950% 2/15/19 02/15/2019 02/17/2009 371,815.84 367,725.60 -4,090.24 2,277.00 4.95 4.857560621 AA- 17275RAX0 Credit CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.450% 6/15/20 06/15/2020 06/17/2015 599,952.00 596,358.00 -3,594.00 4,328.33 2.45 2.467072139 AA- 17275RBG6 Credit CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.400% 9/20/19 09/20/2019 09/20/2016 39,955.60 39,360.80 -594.80 17.11 1.4 1.422099425 AA- 17305EGA7 Asset -Backed CITIBANK CREDIT CARD 1.740% 1/19/21 01/19/2021 01/26/2017 379,927.23 377,837.80 -2,089.43 1,359.13 1.74 1.749482193 AAA 17305EGB5 Asset -Backed CITIBANK CREDIT 1.920% 4/07/22 04/07/2022 04/11/2017 -AIL 229,933.74 226,506.30 -3,427.44 2,134.40 1.92 1.953264087 AAA 191216BT6 Credit COCA COLA CO THE 1.875 % 10/27/20 10/27/2020 10/27/2015 500,187.99 490,330.00 -9,857.99 4,010.42 1.88 1.918335192 A+ 191216BV1 Credit COCA COLA CO 1.375% 5/30/19 05/30/2019 05/31/2016 249,825.00 246,920.00 -2,905.00 1,155.38 1.38 1.391799014 A+ 30231GAV4 Credit EXXON MOBIL 2.222% 3/01/21 03/01/2021 03/03/2016 02/01/2021 495,685.00 492,555.00 -3,130.00 925.83 2.22 2.258428451 AA+ 3130AAXX1 Agencies F H L B DEB 1.375% 3/18/19 03/18/2019 06/27/2019 03/10/2017 06/27/2017 518,793.60 516,016.80 -2,776.80 258.19 1.38 1.385488145 AA+ 3130ABMP8 Agencies F H L B DEB 1.515% 6/27/19 769,912.61 770,130.90 218.29 162.02 2.13 1.512685591 AA+ 3130ACE26 Agencies F H L B 1.375% 9/28/20 09/28/2020 09/08/2017 1 358,844.40 351,172.80 -7,671.60 41.25 1.38 1.416007580 AA+ 3130ADN32 Agencies F H L B DEB 2.125% 2/11/20 02/11/2020 02/09/2018 798,536.00 796,688.00 -1,848.00 2,455.56 2.13 2.139592018 AA+ 3130ADUJ9 Agencies F H L B DEB 2.375% 3/30/20 03/30/2020 03/16/2018 929,832.60 930,120.90 288.30 920.31 2.38 2.381382104 AA+ 3133EH2J1 Agencies F F C B 1.74957% 12/11/20 12/11/2020 12/11/2017 510,000.00 510,096.90 96.90 473.25 1.75 1.749535009 AA+ 3133EHRD7 Agencies F F C B DEB 1.83032% 7/13/22 07/13/2022 07/13/2017 310,000.00 309,748.90 -251.10 272.12 1.83 1.829387013 AA+ 3133EHRZ8 Agencies F F C B DEB 1.8715 % 6/25/20 06/25/2020 07/25/2017 510,000.00 510,086.70 _ 86.70 160.72 1.87 1.871294058 AA+ 3133EHTJ2 Agencies F F C B DEB 1.95688% 8/01/22 08/01/2022 08/01/2017 230,000.00 229,825.20 -174.80 332.38 1.73 1.958348762 AA+ 3133EHVR1 Agencies F F C B DEB 1.8815 % 8/24/20 08/24/2020 08/24/2017 130,000.00 129,977.90 -22.10 47.11 1.88 1.881067454 AA+ 3133EHXH1 Agencies F F C B 1.7705% 9/06/22 09/06/2022 09/06/2017 260,000.00 260,062.40 62.40 299.64 1.77 1.770075182 AA+ 3135G0J53 Agencies F N M A DEB 1.000 % 2/26/19 02/26/2019 02/23/2016 498,820.00 494,760.00 -4,060.00 486.11 1 1.010080604 AA+ 3135GOK77 Agencies F N M A DEB 1.250% 6/13/19 06/13/2019 06/13/2016 06/13/2018 490,000.00 484,335.60 -5,664.40 1,837.50 1.25 1.265758696 AA+ 3135GON33 Agencies FNMA 0.875% 8/02/19 08/02/2019 08/02/2016 529,109.60 520,470.60 -8,639.00 760.03 0.88 0.891801541 AA+ 3135G0P49 Agencies FNMA 1.000% 8/28/19 08/28/2019 09/02/2016 509,204.40 501,539.10 -7,665.30 439.17 1 1.018599629 AA+ 3135GOT29 Agencies F N M A DEB 1.500 % 2/28/20 02/28/2020 02/28/2017 299,808.00 295,473.00 -4,335.00 387.50 1.5 1.527339375 AA+ 3136AMTM1 Mortgage -Backed F N M A GTD REMIC 1.858% 9/25/18 09/25/2018 03/01/2015 60,563.06 60,522.24 -40.82 19.43 1.8 1.860101915 N/A 3137BNN26 Mortgage -Backed F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19 07/25/2019 04/01/2016 55,062.34 54,360.06 -702.28 81.34 1.78 1.796945193 N/A 3137BPCF4 Mortgage -Backed F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.376 % 10/25/20 10/25/2020 05/01/2016 189,629.86 188,049.83 -1,580.03 43.49 1.38 1.386999103 N/A 3137EAEB1 Agencies F H L M C M T N 0.875% 7/19/19 07/19/2019 07/20/2016 350,150.58 344,973.33 -5,177.25 614.25 0.88 0.890938897 AA+ 3137EAEH8 Agencies F H L M C 1.375% 8/15/19 08/15/2019 07/19/2017 509,250.30 504,063.60 -5,186.70 896.04 1.38 1.393279831 AA+ 3137EAEK1 Agencies F H L M C M T N 1.875% 11/17/20 11/17/2020 11/15/2017 549,472.00 541,904.00 -7,568.00 3,895.83 1.88 1.911919159 AA+ 3137EAEL9 Agencies F H L M C M T N 2.375% 2/16/21 02/16/2021 02/16/2018 508,653.60 508,556.70 -96.90 1,514.06 2.38 2.394636015 AA+ 31846V203 FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 209,648.12 209,648.12 0.00 483.65 1.266842000 43814PAC4 Asset -Backed HONDA AUTO 1.790% 9/20/21 09/20/2021 09/29/2017 149,983.76 147,768.00 -2,215.76 96.96 1.79 1.819549484 AAA 47787XAC1 Asset -Backed JOHN DEERE OWNER 1.780% 4/15/21 04/15/2021 03/02/2017 309,955.86 306,673.70 -3,282.16 245.24 1.78 1.800052586 N/A 478160CH5 Credit JOHNSON JOHNSON 1.950% 11/10/20 11/10/2020 11/10/2017 249,732.50 245,927.50 -3,805.00 1,909.38 1.95 1.990384910 AAA 48125LRJ3 Credit JP MORGAN MTN 2.26464% 9/23/19 09/23/2019 09/23/2016 850,393.53 849,216.55 -1,176.98 478.41 2.86 2.250708017 A+ 544445AY5 Taxable Muni LOS ANGELES CA DEPT 1.750% 5/15/19 05/15/2019 12/06/2016 100,000.00 99,364.00 -636.00 661.11 1.75 1.762886702 AA 54465AGK2 Taxable Muni LOS ANGELES CA 1.125% 9/01/19 09/01/2019 08/25/2016 266,868.00 264,918.60 -1,949.40 253.13 1.13 1.144653704 AA 54473ERQ9 Taxable Muni LOS ANGELES CNTY CA 2.036% 12/01/18 12/01/2018 09/02/2015 = 50,000.00 49,896.00 -104.00 339.33 2.04 2.039079009 AA 58769DAD2 Asset -Backed MERCEDES BENZ AUTO 1.790% 4/15/20 04/15/2020 04/26/2017 369,991.56 367,539.50 -2,452.06 294.36 1.79 1.802999627 AAA 589331AN7 Credit MERCK CO INC 5.000% 6/30/19 06/30/2019 06/25/2009 524,337.47 514,675.00 -9,662.47 6,319.44 5 4.865564454 AA 594918BV5 Credit MICROSOFT CORP 1.850% 2/06/20 02/06/2020 02/06/2017 499,665.00 495,015.00 -4,650.00 1,413.19 1.85 1.874746656 AAA 6055806F1 Taxable Muni MISSISSIPPI ST SER D 3.381% 11/01/18 11/01/2018 11/10/2010 101,565.62 100,749.00 -816.62 1,408.75 3.38 3.363576673 AA 49 COUNTY PERIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio b Investment Cate • o for Quarter ended March 31, 2018 Account Number: 001050990415 CUSIP Security Type Category 649791EJ5 Taxable Muni Name: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMM Next Call Final Maturity Trade Date Date 09/01/2019 03/30/2011 Original Cost 514,535.14 Base Market Value Unrealized Gain/Loss Accrued Income Coupon Yield Credit Rating Issuer NEW YORK ST REF SER 3.600 % 9/01/19 507,430.00 -7,105.14 1,500.00 3.6 3.557769279 AA+ 649791EV8 Taxable Muni NEW YORK ST SER B 3.600% 2/15/19 02/15/2019 03/30/2011 254,765.48 252,700.00 -2,065.48 1,150.00 3.6 3.567959722 AA+ 65479BAD2 Asset -Backed NISSAN AUTO LEASE 2.050% 9/15/20 09/15/2020 10/10/2017 219,961.57 217,973.80 -1,987.77 200.44 2.05 2.071690601 N/A 68389XAQ8 Credit ORACLE CORP 2.375% 1/15/19 01/15/2019 07/16/2013 504,103.17 500,000.00 -4,103.17 2,506.94 2.38 2.372722187 AA- 702282ND2 Taxable Muni PASADENA CA UNIF 1.861 % 11/01/18 11/01/2018 03/20/2014 250,505.37 249,690.00 -815.37 1,938.54 1.86 1.863441108 A+ 717081DL4 Credit PFIZER INC 2.100% 5/15/19 05/15/2019 05/15/2014 251,501.53 249,077.50 -2,424.03 1,983.33 2.1 2.109704641 AA 717081DU4 Credit PFIZER INC 1.450% 6/03/19 06/03/2019 06/03/2016 249,715.00 247,167.50 -2,547.50 1,188.19 1.45 1.467700468 AA 742718EZ8 Credit PROCTER GAMBLE CO 1.750% 10/25/19 10/25/2019 10/25/2017 149,947.50 148,341.00 -1,606.50 1,137.50 1.75 1.770054720 AA- 797669XT0 Taxable Muni SAN FRANCISCO CA 21.690% 7/01/20 07/01/2020 12/28/2017 100,000.00 99,536.00 -464.00 5,603.25 2.17 21.878814166 AA+ 79770GGM2 Taxable Muni SAN FRANCISCO CITY 2.000% 8/01/20 08/01/2020 11/30/2017 299,607.00 296,880.00 -2,727.00 1,000.00 2 2.029241368 AA- 798170AB2 Taxable Muni SAN JOSE CA 2.098% 8/01/19 08/01/2019 12/21/2017 320,000.00 319,104.00 -896.00 1,118.93 2.1 2.108140154 AA 798170AC0 Taxable Muni SAN JOSE CA REDEV 2.259% 8/01/20 08/01/2020 12/21/2017 190,000.00 189,129.80 -870.20 715.35 2.26 2.280044814 AA 79876CBQ0 Taxable Muni SAN MARCOS CA REDEV 2.000% 10/01/20 10/01/2020 12/14/2017 109,256.40 108,182.80 -1,073.60 653.89 2 2.044404465 AA- 80284TAF2 Asset -Backed SANTANDER DRIVE 1.770% 9/15/20 09/15/2020 02/28/2017 109,999.24 109,654.60 -344.64 86.53 1.77 1.774845328 AAA 857477AS2 Credit STATE STREET CORP 2.550% 8/18/20 08/18/2020 08/18/2015 795,442.43 783,405.96 -12,036.47 2,400.12 2.55 2.569890956 A 882723UC1 Taxable Muni TEXAS ST REF WTR 2.036% 8/01/20 08/01/2020 02/05/2015 251,436.00 248,330.00 -3,106.00 848.33 2.04 2.058291295 AAA 89190BAD0 Asset -Backed TOYOTA AUTO 1.760% 7/15/21 07/15/2021 05/17/2017 519,960.12 513,463.60 -6,496.52 406.76 1.76 1.784555483 AAA 89238MAD0 Asset -Backed TOYOTA AUTO 1.730 % 2/16/21 02/16/2021 03/15/2017 375,955.74 372,055.76 -3,899.98 289.10 1.73 1.749135543 AAA 90290AAC1 Asset -Backed USAA AUTO OWNER 1.700% 5/17/21 05/17/2021 09/20/2017 139,985.24 138,479.60 -1,505.64 105.78 1.7 1.719986240 AAA 90331HNG4 Credit US BANK NA MTN 2.050% 10/23/20 10/23/2020 10/24/2017 09/23/2020 249,950.00 244,642.50 -5,307.50 2,235.07 2.05 2.097594417 AA- 90331HNJ8 Credit US BANK NA MTN 2.350% 1/23/20 01/23/2020 01/23/2018 12/23/2019 254,885.25 252,934.50 -1,950.75 1,131.92 2.35 2.371222441 AA- 91159HHQ6 Credit US BANCORP MTN 2.3813% 1/24/22 01/24/2022 01/24/2017 12/23/2021 504,695.00 503,870.00 -825.00 2,215.93 2.38 2.360878402 A+ 912828202 Treasuries U S TREASURY NT 1.500 % 8/15/20 08/15/2020 08/15/2017 1,457,105.41 1,430,035.56 -27,069.85 2,718.65 1.5 1.535265038 N/A 9128282T6 Treasuries U S TREASURY NT 1.250% 8/31/19 08/31/2019 08/31/2017 2,674,565.71 2,642,779.92 -31,785.79 2,911.96 1.25 1.268932472 N/A 9128282X7 Treasuries U S TREASURY NT 1.375 % 9/30/19 09/30/2019 09/30/2017 3,454,671.27 3,415,539.00 -39,161.32 23,917.49 1.38 1.395046823 N/A 9128283H1 Treasuries U S TREASURY NT 1.750% 11/30/19 11/30/2019 11/30/2017 2,516,554.69 2,499,235.20 -17,319.49 14,780.77 1.75 1.768856005 N/A 9128283N8 Treasuries U S TREASURY NT 1.875% 12/31/19 12/31/2019 01/02/2018 1,535,802.35 1,529,712.80 -6,089.55 7,060.10 1.88 1.892448374 N/A 9128283S7 Treasuries U S TREASURY NT 2.000% 1/31/20 01/31/2020 01/31/2018 2,823,588.28 2,816,500.90 -7,087.38 9,381.22 2 2.015580437 N/A 9128283T5 Treasuries U S TREASURY NT 1.67343% 1/31/20 01/31/2020 01/31/2018 499,585.26 499,415.00 -170.26 1,195.83 1.77 1.673678952 N/A 9128283X6 Treasuries U S TREASURY NT 2.250 % 2/15/21 02/15/2021 02/15/2018 119,446.88 119,540.40 93.52 335.64 2.25 2.271648813 N/A 9128283Y4 Treasuries U S TREASURY NT 2.250 % 2/29/20 02/29/2020 02/28/2018 265,020.70 264,875.45 -145.25 518.48 2.25 2.258990783 N/A 912828E62 Treasuries U S TREASURY NT 1.500% 10/31/19 10/31/2019 10/31/2014 2,215,353.72 2,194,070.40 -21,283.32 13,996.98 1.5 1.520604187 N/A 912828P95 Treasuries U S TREASURY NT 1.000% 3/15/19 03/15/2019 03/15/2016 1,500,960.71 1,484,070.00 -17,132.89 692.93 1 1.010979234 N/A 91412G2R5 Taxable Muni UNIV OF CALIFORNIA 1.877% 5/15/20 05/15/2020 09/28/2017 90,000.00 88,492.50 -1,507.50 858.73 1.88 1.909033584 AA- 91412G2S3 Taxable Muni UNIV OF CALIFORNIA 2.112% 5/15/21 05/15/2021 09/28/2017 140,000.00 136,388.00 -3,612.00 1,503.04 2.11 2.163757069 AA- 91412GD36 Taxable Muni UNIV OF CA 1.169% 5/15/19 05/15/2019 04/20/2016 140,000.00 138,493.60 -1,506.40 618.27 1.17 1.182480275 AA 91412GWU5 Taxable Muni UNIV CALIFORNIA CA 1.418% 5/15/18 05/15/2018 03/25/2015 250,000.00 249,847.50 -152.50 1,339.22 1.42 1.418269471 AA 91412GWV3 Taxable Muni UNIV OF CA 2.003% 5/15/19 05/15/2019 03/25/2015 250,000.00 249,597.50 -402.50 1,891.72 2 2.008845741 AA 931142DY6 Credit WALMART STORES INC 1.750% 10/09/19 10/09/2019 10/20/2017 294,994.10 291,828.75 -3,165.35 2,308.78 1.75 1.767480381 AA 94988J5D5 Credit WELLS FARGO BANK MTN 1.750% 5/24/19 05/24/2019 06/02/2016 503,793.05 499,273.30 -4,519.75 3,117.67 1.75 1.766766615 A+ 94988J5J2 Credit WELLS FARGO MTN 2.15849/ 12/06/19 12/06/2019 12/08/2016 504,128.57 502,900.00 -1,228.57 779.45 2.68 2.142889763 A+ 51,312,069.80 50,839,672.54 (472,668.49) 199,761.47 IMFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Transaction Report Quarter ended March 31, 2018 ATTACHMENT 16 Account Number: 001050990415 Name: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMM Transaction Settlement Date Trade Date Date CUSIP Description Units Price Miscellaneous Commissions SEC Fees Fees Net Cash Amount Amount Short Term Federal Tax Cost Gain/Loss Amount Long Term Gain/Loss Amount INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B DEB 1.43069% 8/01/22 $1 PV ON 230000.0000 0 nnnnnn 1/2/2018 1/2/2018 1/2/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 15,592.8600 1.000000 - - - (15,592.86) 15,592.86 - - 1/2/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y UNIT ON 0.0000 SHARES DUE 31846V203 12/31/2017 INTEREST FROM 12/1/17 TO 12/31/17 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 276.54 - - - 1/2/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON MERCK CO INC 5.000% 6/30/19 $1 PV ON 500000.0000 589331AN7 SHARES DUE 12/30/2017 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 12,500.00 - - - 1/2/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON NEW YORK UNIVERSITY 1.315% 7/01/18 $1 PV ON 650119AE0 120000.0000 SHARES DUE 1/1/2018 _ 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 789.00 - - - 1/2/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON UNIV CALIFORNIA CA 1.796% 7/01/19 $1 PV ON 91412GSB2 225000.0000 SHARES DUE 1/1/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 2,020.50 - - - 1/3/2018 1/3/2018 1/3/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y ` 276.5400 1.000000 - - - (276.54) 276.54 - - 1/8/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B 1.47181 % 9/06/22 $1 PV ON 260000.0000 3133EHXH1 SHARES DUE 1/6/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 329.52 - - - 1/8/2018 1/8/2018 1/8/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 329.5200 1.000000 - - - (329.52) 329.52 - - 1/11/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B 1.44185% 12/11/20 $1 PV ON 510000.0000 3133EH2J1 SHARES DUE 1/11/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 633.21 - - - 1/11/2018 1/11/2018 1/11/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 3,389.2400 1.000000 - - (3,389.24) 3,389.24 - - 1/11/2018 1/11/2018 1/11/2018 ___T___ 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 788,778.8900 1.000000 - - - (788,778.89) 788,778.89 - - 1/11/2018 1/9/2018 1/11/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF TOYOTA MOTOR MTN 0.00001 % 1/11/22 /MIZUHO 89236TDQ5 SECURITIES USA INC./527,000 PAR VALUE AT 101.346801 % -527,000.0000 1.013468 - - - 534,097.64 (533,584.67) 512.97 - 1/11/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON TOYOTA MOTOR MTN 0.00001 % 1/11/22 CURRENT 89236TDQ5 YEAR AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - (48.16) - - 1/11/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON TOYOTA MOTOR MTN 0.00001 % 1/11/22 $1 PV ON 89236TDQ5 527000.0000 SHARES DUE 1/11/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 2,756.03 - - - 1/11/2018 1/11/2018 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF TOYOTA MOTOR MTN 1.950% 89236TDU6 4/17/20 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 1,160.25 - - - 1/11/2018 1/9/2018 1/11/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF TOYOTA MOTOR MTN 1.950% 4/17/20 /CREDIT AGRICOLE 89236TDU6 SECURITIES (US/XOTC 255,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.42 % -255,000.0000 0.994200 - - - 253,521.00 (254,882.70) (1,361.70) - 1/12/2018 1/12/2018 3130ACM92 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF F H L B 1.500% 10/21/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 2,002.50 - - - 1/12/2018 1/11/2018 1/12/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF F H L B 1.500% 10/21/19 /MORGAN STANLEY & CO. 3130ACM92 LLC/540,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.153 % -540,000.0000 0.991530 - - - 535,426.20 (539,044.20) (3,618.00) - 1/12/2018 1/12/2018 1/12/2018 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y -1,873.3500 1.000000 - - - 1,873.35 (1,873.35) - - 1/12/2018 1/12/2018 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.875% 9128283N8 12/31/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - (335.64) • - - - 1/12/2018 1/11/2018 1/12/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.875% 12/31/19 /NOMURA 9128283N8 SECURITIES/FIX INCOME/540,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.80859444 % 540,000.0000 0.998086 - - - 538,966.41 538,966.41 - - 1/16/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON AMERICAN EXPRESS 1.640% 12/15/21 $1 PV ON 02582JHG8 420000.0000 SHARES DUE 1/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - 574.00 - - 1/16/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST 1.370% 6/15/21 CURRENT 161571HC1 YEAR AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - 4.85 - - 1/16/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST 1.370% 6/15/21 $1 PV ON 161571HC1 750000.0000 SHARES DUE 1/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 856.25 - - - 1/16/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B DEB 1.53951 % 7/13/22 $1 PV ON 310000.0000 3133EHRD7 SHARES DUE 1/13/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 410.96 - - - 1/16/2018 1/16/2018 1/16/2018 1/16/2018 1/16/2018 1/16/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 2,817.8300 1.000000 - - - (2,817.83) 2,817.83 - 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 8,013.7800 1.000000 - - - (8,013.78) 8,013.78 - 1/16/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON JOHN DEERE OWNER 1.780% 4/15/21 $1 PV ON 47787XAC1 310000.0000 SHARES DUE 1/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 459.83 - 1/16/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON MERCEDES BENZ AUTO 1.790% 4/15/20 $1 PV ON 58769DAD2 551.9200 SHARES DUE 1/15/2018 $0.00149/PV ON 370,000.00 PV DUE 1/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 551.92 1/16/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON NISSAN AUTO LEASE 2.050% 9/15/20 $1 PV ON 375.8300 65479BAD2 SHARES DUE 1/15/2018 $0.00171/PV ON 220,000.00 PV DUE 1/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 375.83 1/16/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON ORACLE CORP 2.375% 1/15/19 CURRENT YEAR 68389XAQ8 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - 156.40 1/16/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON ORACLE CORP 2.375% 1/15/19 $1 PV ON 500000.0000 68389XAQ8 SHARES DUE 1/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 5,937.50 1/16/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON SANTANDER DRIVE 1.770% 9/15/20 $1 PV ON 162.2500 80284TAF2 SHARES DUE 1/15/2018 $0.00148/PV ON 110,000.00 PV DUE 1/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 162.25 1/16/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON TOYOTA AUTO 1.760% 7/15/21 $1 PV ON 762.6700 IF 89190BAD0 SHARES DUE 1/15/2018 $0.00147/PV ON 520,000.00 PV DUE 1/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 762.67 - - 1/16/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON TOYOTA AUTO 1.730% 2/16/21 $1 PV ON 542.0700 89238MAD0 SHARES DUE 1/15/2018 $0.00144/PV ON 376,000.00 PV DUE 1/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 542.07 - - - 1/16/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON USAA AUTO OWNER 1.700% 5/17/21 $1 PV ON 198.3300 90290AAC1 SHARES DUE 1/15/2018 $0.00142/PV ON 140,000.00 PV DUE 1/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 198.33 - - - 1/17/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON CITIBANK CREDIT CARD 1.740% 1/19/21 $1 PV ON 17305EGA7 380000.0000 SHARES DUE 1/17/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - 3,306.00 - - - 1/17/2018 1/17/2018 1/17/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y L 3,306.0000 1.000000 - - (3,306.00) 3,306.00 - - 1/17/2018 1/17/2018 1/17/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 882,960.6100 1.000000 - - (882,960.61) 882,960.61 - - 1/17/2018 Tr ' + 1/17/2018 66989HAD0 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF NOVARTIS CAPITAL 4.400% 4/24/20 0.0000 0.000000 - - 4,818.61 - - - 1/17/2018 1/12/2018 1/17/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF NOVARTIS CAPITAL 4.400% 4/24/20 /GOLDMAN SACHS & 66989HAD0 CO. LLC/XOTC 475,000 PAR VALUE AT 104.846 % -475,000.0000 1.048460 - - - 498,018.50 (501,840.87) (3,822.37) - 1/17/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON NOVARTIS CAPITAL 4.400% 4/24/20 CURRENT YEAR 66989HAD0 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - (515.50) - - 51 Page 26 of 32 IMFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Transaction Report Quarter ended March 31, 2018 Account Number: 001050990415 Name: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMM Transaction Settlement Date Trade Date Date CUSIP Description Units Price Miscellaneous Commissions SEC Fees Fees Net Cash Amount Amount Short Term Federal Tax Cost Gain/Loss Amount Long Term Gain/Loss Amount 1/ 1IILU 10 1/17/2018 I/ I I/LU le 00UOUr1MLL Mal...Val-I ..,-0.-.MLICIJ III I CRC° I VII 01-11-C ur 14,.../V/Ark I I.. t...etri I I,- 1.01,70 LI 1.1/LV SOLD PAR VALUE OF NOVARTIS CAPITAL 1.800 % 2/14/20 /MILLENNIUM 1/12/2018 1/17/2018 68989HAL2 ADVISORS, LLC/130,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.17 % U.000U -130,000.0000 U.000UUU - - 0.991700 - - - Utl9.0U - 128,921.00 - (129,491.70) - - (570.70) - 1/17/2018 1/17/2018 91412GPZ2 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF UNIV OF CA 1.296 % 5/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 558.00 - - - 1/17/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF UNIV OF CA 1.296% 5/15/18 /MORGAN STANLEY & CO. 1/12/2018 1/17/2018 91412GPZ2 LLC/250,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.86 % -250,000.0000 0.998600 - - - 249,650.00 (250,215.03) - (565.03) 1/17/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON UNIV OF CA 1.296% 5/15/18 CURRENT YEAR 91412GPZ2 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - (29.51) - - 1/18/2018 1/18/2018 1/18/2018 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y -997,768.2600 1.000000 - - - 997,768.26 (997,768.26) - - 1/18/2018 1/18/2018 1/18/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 223.7500 1.000000 - - - (223.75) 223.75 - - 1/18/2018 ■ INTEREST EARNED ON HONDA AUTO 1.790 % 9/20/21 $1 PV ON 223.7500 43814PAC4 SHARES DUE 1/18/2018 $0.00149/PV ON 150,000.00 PV DUE 1/18/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 223.75 - - - 1/18/2018 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.875 % 1/18/2018 9128283N8 12/31/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - (932.32) - - - 1/18/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.875 % 12/31/19 /BMO CAPITAL 1/17/2018 1/18/2018 9128283N8 MARKETS CORP/BONDS/1,000,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.683594 % 1,000,000.0000 0.996836 - - - (996,835.94) 996,835.94 - - 1/19/2018 1/19/2018 3130ABF92 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF F H L B 1.375 % 5/28/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 1,421.98 - - - 1/19/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF F H L B 1.375 % 5/28/19 /MLPFS INC/FIXED 1/18/2018 1/19/2018 3130ABF92 INCOME/730,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.182 % _ -730,000.0000 0.991820 - - - 724,028.60 (728,620.30) (4,591.70) - 1/19/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F H L M C M T N 0.875% 7/19/19 $1 PV ON 351000.0000 3137EAEB1 SHARES DUE 1/19/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 1,535.63 - - - 1/19/2018 1/19/2018 1/19/2018 1/19/2018 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y -40.9600 0.0000 1.000000 - - 0.000000 - - - 40.96 - (1,504.12) (40.96) - - - - - 1/19/2018 912828WL0 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.500% 5/31/19 1/19/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.500 % 5/31/19 1/18/2018 1/19/2018 912828WL0 /BONY/TORONTO DOMINION SECURITI/730,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.38671918 % 730,000.0000 0.993867 - - - (725,523.05) 725,523.05 - - 1/22/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON BMW VEHICLE LEASE 2.070 % 10/20/20 $1 PV ON 172.5000 05584PAD9 SHARES DUE 1/20/2018 $0.00173/PV ON 100,000.00 PV DUE 1/20/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 172.50 - - - 1/22/2018 1/22/2018 1/22/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 750,548.8600 1.000000 - - - (750,548.86) 750,548.86 -� 1/22/2018 1/22/2018 1/22/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 172.5000 1.000000 - - - (172.50) 172.50 1/22/2018 1/22/2018 90331HMY6 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF US BANK NA MTN 1.400% 4/26/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 2,525.06 - -- 1/22/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF US BANK NA MTN 1.400 % 4/26/19 /W ELLS FARGO 1/18/2018 1/22/2018 90331 HMY6 SECURITIES, LLC/XOTC 755,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.076 % -755,000.0000 0.990760 - - - 748,023.80 (750,413.40) (2,389 .60 - 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y _i_ _ -254,885.2500 1.000000 - - - 254,885.25 (254,885.25) 1/23/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF US BANK NA 2.350% 1/23/20 /US BANCORP 1/18/2018 1/23/2018 90331 HNJ8 INVESTMENTS INC./255,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.955 % 255,000.0000 0.999550 - - - (254,885.25) 254,885.25 - - 1/24/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B DEB 1.56213% 8/24/20 $1 PV ON 130000.0000 3133EHVR1 SHARES DUE 1/24/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 174.87 - - - 1/24/2018 1/24/2018 1/24/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 174.8700 1.000000 - - - (174.87) 174.87 - 1/25/2018 TRUST FEES COLLECTED CHARGED FOR PERIOD 12/01/2017 THRU 12/31/2017 COLLECTED BY DISBURSEMENT 0.0000 0.000000 - - - (529.97)- 1/25/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON BMW VEHICLE OWNER 1.160% 11/25/20 $1 PV ON 05582QAD9 439.8300 SHARES DUE 1/25/2018 $0.00097/PV ON 455,000.00 PV DUE 1/25/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 439.83 - - - 1/25/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B 1.55213 % 6/25/20 $1 PV ON 510000.0000 3133EHRZ8 SHARES DUE 1/25/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 681.64 ' - - - 1/25/2018 1/25/2018 1/25/2018 3136AMTM1 PAID DOWN PAR VALUE OF F N M A GTD REMIC 1.186% 9/25/18 -10,624.9100 0.000000 - - - 10,624.91 (10,622.19) - 2.72 1/25/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F N M A GTD REMIC 1.186 % 9/25/18 $1 PV ON 169.9200 3136AMTM1 SHARES DUE 1/25/2018 $0.00129/PV ON 132,197.73 PV DUE 1/25/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 169.92 - - - 1/25/2018 1/25/2018 1/25/2018 3137BNN26 PAID DOWN PAR VALUE OF F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780 % 7/25/19 -95.9100 0.010426 - - - 95.91 (96.35) - (0.44) 1/25/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780 % 7/25/19 CURRENT YEAR 3137BNN26 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - (11.55) - - 1/25/2018 m INTEREST EARNED ON F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19 $1 PV ON 84.6700 3137BNN26 SHARES DUE 1/25/2018 $0.00148/PV ON 57,082.15 PV DUE 1/25/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 84.67 - - - 1/25/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.376% 10/25/20 $1 PV ON 250.6300 3137BPCF4 SHARES DUE 1/25/2018 $0.00115/PV ON 218,572.01 PV DUE 1/25/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 250.63 - - - 1/25/2018 1/25/2018 1/25/2018 3137BPCF4 PAID DOWN PAR VALUE OF F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.376 % 10/25/20 -27,241.5000 0.000000 - - - 27,241.50 (27,241.28) - 0.22 1/25/2018 1/25/2018 1/25/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 11,386.3300 1.000000 - - - (11,386.33) 11,386.33 - - 1/25/2018 1/25/2018 1/25/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 27,672.7100 1.000000 - - - (27,672.71) 27,672.71 - - 1/29/2018 1/29/2018 1/29/2018 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y -329,694.3500 1.000000 - - - 329,694.35 (329,694.35) - - 1/29/2018 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF STATE STREET CORP 2.550 % 1/29/2018 857477AS2 8/18/20 0.0000 0.000000 - - - (3,706.35) - - - 1/29/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF STATE STREET CORP 2.550 % 8/18/20 /SUNTRUST 1/25/2018 1/29/2018 857477AS2 ROBINSON HUMPHREY, IN/325,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.304 % 325,000.0000 1.003040 - - - (325,988.00) 325,988.00 - - 1/30/2018 1/30/2018 03783313Q2 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF APPLE INC 1.700% 2/22/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 296.56 - - - 1/30/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF APPLE INC 1.700% 2/22/19 /WELLS FARGO 1/26/2018 1/30/2018 037833BQ2 SECURITIES, LLC/XOTC 40,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.557 % 40,000.0000 0.995570 - - - 39,822.80 (39,993.20) - (170.40) 1/30/2018 1/30/2018 037833BS8 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF APPLE INC 2.250 % 2/23/21 0.0000 0.000000 - - - (4,906.25) - - - 1/30/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF APPLE INC 2.250% 2/23/21 /GOLDMAN SACHS & 1/26/2018 1/30/2018 037833BS8 CO. LLC/500,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.135 % 500,000.0000 0.991350 - - - (495,675.00) 495,675.00 - - 1/30/2018 1/30/2018 037833CB4 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF APPLE INC 1.100% 8/02/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 322.67 - - - 1/30/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF APPLE INC 1.100 % 8/02/19 /TORONTO DOMINION 1/26/2018 1/30/2018 037833CB4 SECURITIES (U/60,000 PAR VALUE AT 98.346883 % -60,000.0000 0.983469 - - - 59,008.13 (59,940.00) - (931.87) 1/30/2018 1/30/2018 037833CE8 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF APPLE INC 1.550% 2/08/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 1,036.78 - - - 52 Page 27 of 32 IMFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Transaction Report Quarter ended March 31, 2018 Account Number: 001050990415 Transaction Settlement Date Trade Date Date Name: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMM CUSIP Description Units Price Miscellaneous Commissions SEC Fees Fees Net Cash Amount Amount Short Term Long Term Federal Tax Cost Gain/Loss Gain/Loss Amount Amount SOLD PAR VALUE OF APPLE INC 1.550 % 2/08/19 /GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. I/3U/LU 10 1/30/2018 1/L0/LU Id I/3U/LU 10 U3/033,C0 L PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY 2.200% 1/30/2018 084670BQ0 3/15/21 -140,000.UUUU 0.0000 U.UU030U - - 0.000000 - - - 1JU,JeJ.LU - (3,885.75) tIJy,0.3.0U) - tJ4U.4U1 - - - - - 1/30/2018 1/26/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY 2.200% 3/15/21 /JEFFERIES 1/30/2018 084670BQ0 LLC/471,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.031 % 471,000.0000 0.990310 - - - (466,436.01) 466,436.01 - 1/30/2018 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.450 1/30/2018 17275RAX0 6/15/20 0.0000 0.000000 - - - (1,837.50) - - 1/30/2018 1/26/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.450% 6/15/20 /J.P. MORGAN 1/30/2018 17275RAX0 SECURITIES LLC/600,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.992 % 600,000.0000 0.999920 - - - (599,952.00) 599,952.00 - - 1/30/2018 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF EXXON MOBIL CORP 1.819 % 1/30/2018 30231GAD4 3/15/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 682.13 - - - 1/30/2018 1/26/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF EXXON MOBIL CORP 1.819 % 3/15/19 /J.P. MORGAN 1/30/2018 30231GAD4 SECURITIES LLC/XOTC 100,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.635 % . -100,000.0000 0.996350 - - - 99,635.00 (100,229.28) (594.28) 1= 1/30/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON EXXON MOBIL CORP 1.819 % 3/15/19 CURRENT YEAR 30231GAD4 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - (17.28) - 1/30/2018 1/30/2018 30231GAP7 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF EXXON MOBIL 1.708% 3/01/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 282.77 - - - 1/30/2018 1/26/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF EXXON MOBIL 1.708% 3/01/19 /J.P. MORGAN 1/30/2018 30231GAP7 SECURITIES LLC/XOTC 40,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.691 % -40,000.0000 0.996910 - - - 39,876.40 40,000.00) 123.60 1/30/2018 1/30/2018 30231GAV4 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF EXXON MOBIL 2.222% 3/01/21 0.0000 0.000000 - - - (4,598.31) - 1/30/2018 1/26/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF EXXON MOBIL 2.222% 3/01/21 /MLPFS INC/FIXED 1/30/2018 30231GAV4 INCOME/500,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.137 % 500,000.0000 0.991370 - - - (495,685.00) 495,685.00 - - 1/30/2018 1/30/2018 1/30/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 171,418.0600 1.000000 - - - (171,418.06) 171,418.06 -- 1/30/2018 1/30/2018 1/30/2018 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y -1,076,489.0700 1.000000 - - - 1,076,489.07 (1,076,489.07) - 1/30/2018 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF JP MORGAN MTN 1.91833 1/30/2018 48125LRJ3 9/23/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - (203.19) 1/30/2018 1/26/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF JP MORGAN MTN 1.91833% 9/23/19 /J.P. MORGAN 1/30/2018 48125LRJ3 SECURITIES LLC/95,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.686 % 95,000.0000 1.006860 - - - (95,651.70) 95,651.70 - - 1/30/2018 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF JP MORGAN MTN 1.91833 1/30/2018 48125LRJ3 9/23/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - (534.71) - - 1/30/2018 1/26/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF JP MORGAN MTN 1.91833% 9/23/19 /PERSHING 1/30/2018 48125LRJ3 LLC/250,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.686 % 250,000.0000 1.006860 - - - (251,715.00) 251,715.00 - - 1/30/2018 1/30/2018 532457BF4 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF ELI LILLY CO 1.950% 3/15/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 3,839.06 - - - 1/30/2018 1/26/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF ELI LILLY CO 1.950 % 3/15/19 /GOLDMAN SACHS & CO. 1/30/2018 532457BF4 LLC/XOTC 525,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.758 % -525,000.0000 0.997580 - - - 523,729.50 (526,909.50) (3,180.00) - 1/30/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON ELI LILLY CO 1.950 % 3/15/19 CURRENT YEAR 532457BF4 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - (133.93) - - 1/30/2018 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF NEW YORK UNIVERSITY 1.315% 1/30/2018 650119AE0 7/01/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 127.12 - - - 1/30/2018 1/26/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF NEW YORK UNIVERSITY 1.315% 7/01/18 /BARCLAYS 1/30/2018 650119AE0 CAPITAL INC. FIXED IN/120,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.776 % -120,000.0000 0.997760 - - - 119,731.20 (120,000.00) - (268.80) 1/30/2018 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF US BANCORP MTN 2.0048 % 1/30/2018 91159HHQ6 1/24/22 0.0000 0.000000 - - - (198.44) - - - 1/30/2018 1/26/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF US BANCORP MTN 2.0048% 1/24/22 /US BANCORP 1/30/2018 91159HHQ6 INVESTMENTS INC./500,000 PAR VALUE AT 100.939 % 500,000.0000 1.009390 - - - (504,695.00) 504,695.00 - - 1/30/2018 1/30/2018 912828P95 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.000 % 3/15/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 3,784.53 - - - 1/30/2018 1/30/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.000 % 3/15/19 /CITIGROUP GLOBAL 1/30/2018 912828P95 MARKETS INC./XOTC 1,000,000 PAR VALUE AT 98.9375 % -1,000,000.0000 0.989375 - - - 989,375.00 (1,000,773.81) - (11,398.81) 1/30/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON U S TREASURY NT 1.000 % 3/15/19 CURRENT YEAR 912828P95 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - (149.29) - - 1/31/2018 1/31/2018 1/31/2018 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y -16,719.5700 1.000000 - - - 16,719.57 (16,719.57) - - 1/31/2018 1/31/2018 9128282X7 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.375% 9/30/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 17,470.05 - - - 1/31/2018 1/30/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.375 % 9/30/19 /CITIGROUP GLOBAL 1/31/2018 9128282X7 MARKETS INC./XOTC 3,760,000 PAR VALUE AT 98.864139 % -3,760,000.0000 0.988641 - - - 3,717,291.63 (3,754,252.91) (36,961.28) - 1/31/2018 1/30/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF U S TREASURY NT 2.000% 1/31/20/CITIGROUP 1/31/2018 9128283S7 GLOBAL MARKETS INC./3,760,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.7734375 % 3,760,000.0000 0.997734 - - - (3,751,481.25) 3,751,481.25 - - 2/1/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B DEB 1.63775% 8/01/22 $1 PV ON 230000.0000 3133EHTJ2 SHARES DUE 2/1/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 324.37 - - - 2/1/2018 2/1/2018 2/1/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 5,108.9000 1.000000 - - - (5, 108.90) 5,108.90 - - 2/1/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y UNIT ON 0.0000 SHARES DUE 31846V203 1/31/2018 INTEREST FROM 1/1/18 TO 1/31/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 616.41 2/1/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON SAN FRANCISCO CITY 2.000 % 8/01/20 $1 PV ON 79770GGM2 300000.0000 SHARES DUE 2/1/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 1,016.67 - - 2/1/2018 2/1/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON SAN JOSE CA 2.098% 8/01/19 $1 PV ON 320000.0000 798170AB2 SHARES DUE 2/1/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON SAN JOSE CA REDEV 2.259% 8/01/20 $1 PV ON 798170AC0 190000.0000 SHARES DUE 2/1/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - 0.000000 - - - 745.96 - 476.90 - - 0.0000 2/1/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON TEXAS ST REF WTR 2.036 % 8/01/20 CURRENT YEAR 882723UC1 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - _ - - 2/1/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON TEXAS ST REF WTR 2.036% 8/01/20 $1 PV ON 882723UC1 250000.0000 SHARES DUE 2/1/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 2,545.00 - - 2/2/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F N M A 0.875 % 8/02/19 $1 PV ON 530000.0000 3135GON33 SHARES DUE 2/2/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 2,318.75 - - - 53 Page 28 of 32 IMFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Transaction Report Quarter ended March 31, 2018 Account Number: 001050990415 Transaction Settlement Name: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMM Miscellaneous Federal Tax Cost Short Term Gain/Loss Long Term Gain/Loss 2/2/2018 2/2/2018 2/2/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 2,935.1600 1.000000 - - - (2,935.16) 2,935.16 - - 2/6/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B 1.635% 9/06/22 $1 PV ON 260000.0000 3133EHXH1 SHARES DUE 2/6/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 366.06 - - - 2/6/2018 2/6/2018 2/6/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 4,991.0600 1.000000 - - - (4,991.06) 4,991.06 - - 2/6/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON MICROSOFT CORP 1.850 % 2/06/20 $1 PV ON 594918BV5 500000.0000 SHARES DUE 2/6/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 4,625.00 - - - 2/9/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF F H L B DEB 2.125% 2/11/20 /WELLS FARGO 2/8/2018 2/9/2018 3130ADN32 SECURITIES, LLC/800,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.817 % 800,000.0000 0.998170 (798,536.00) 798,536.00 - - 2/9/2018 2/9/2018 2/9/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 226,391.8900 1.000000 - (226,391.89) 226,391.89 - - 2/9/2018 2/9/2018 9128282X7 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.375% 9/30/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 1,495.88 - - - 2/9/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.375% 9/30/19 /CITIGROUP GLOBAL 2/8/2018 2/9/2018 9128282X7 MARKETS INC./XOTC 300,000 PAR VALUE AT 98.819978 % -300,000.0000 0.988200 - - - 296,459.93 (299,541.46) (3,081.53) - 2/9/2018 2/9/2018 912828WL0 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.500 % 5/31/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 2,135.85 - - - 2/9/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.500 % 5/31/19 /CITIGROUP GLOBAL 2/8/2018 2/9/2018 912828WL0 MARKETS INC./XOTC 730,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.292634 % -730,000.0000 0.992926 - - - 724,836.23 (725,523.05) (686.82) - 2/12/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B 1.56375 % 12/11/20 $1 PV ON 510000.0000 3133EH2J1 SHARES DUE 2/11/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 686.75 - - - 2/12/2018 2/12/2018 2/12/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 686.7500 1.000000 - - - (686.75) 686.75 - - 2/13/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B DEB 1.63945% 7/13/22 $1 PV ON 310000.0000 3133EHRD7 SHARES DUE 2/13/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 437.64 - - - 2/13/2018 2/13/2018 2/13/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 437.6400 1.000000 - - - (437.64) 437.64 - - 2/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON AMERICAN EXPRESS 1.640 % 12/15/21 $1 PV ON 02582JHG8 420000.0000 SHARES DUE 2/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 574.00 - - - 2/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY 1.300% 8/15/19 $1 PV ON 084664CK5 160000.0000 SHARES DUE 2/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 1,040.00 - - - 2/15/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST 1.370% 6/15/21 CURRENT 161571HC1 YEAR AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - 9.07 - 2/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST 1.370% 6/15/21 $1 PV ON ilir 161571HC1 750000.0000 SHARES DUE 2/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 856.25 - - 2/15/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.950% 2/15/19 CURRENT YEAR 17275RAE2 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - 1,424.39 2/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.950% 2/15/19 $1 PV ON 17275RAE2 360000.0000 SHARES DUE 2/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 8,910.00 - - 2/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F H L M C 1.375% 8/15/19 $1 PV ON 510000.0000 3137EAEH8 SHARES DUE 2/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 4,012.71 - - - 2/15/2018 2/15/2018 2/15/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 2,817.8300 1.000000 - - - (2,817.83) 2,817.83 - - 2/15/2018 2/15/2018 2/15/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 31,063.0300 1.000000 - (31,063.03) 31,063.03 - - 2/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON JOHN DEERE OWNER 1.780% 4/15/21 $1 PV ON 459.8300 47787XAC1 SHARES DUE 2/15/2018 $0.00148/PV ON 310,000.00 PV DUE 2/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 459.83 - - - 2/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON MERCEDES BENZ AUTO 1.790% 4/15/20 $1 PV ON 58769DAD2 551.9200 SHARES DUE 2/15/2018 $0.00149/PV ON 370,000.00 PV DUE 2/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 551.92 - - - 2/15/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON NEW YORK ST SER B 3.600% 2/15/19 CURRENT YEAR 649791EV8 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - (573.30) - - 2/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON NEW YORK ST SER B 3.600 % 2/15/19 $1 PV ON 649791 EV8 250000.0000 SHARES DUE 2/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 4,500.00 - - - 2/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON NISSAN AUTO LEASE 2.050 % 9/15/20 $1 PV ON 375.8300 65479BAD2 SHARES DUE 2/15/2018 $0.00171/PV ON 220,000.00 PV DUE 2/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 375.83 - - - 2/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON SANTANDER DRIVE 1.770% 9/15/20 $1 PV ON 162.2500 80284TAF2 SHARES DUE 2/15/2018 $0.00148/PV ON 110,000.00 PV DUE 2/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 162.25 - - - 2/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON TOYOTA AUTO 1.760% 7/15/21 $1 PV ON 762.6700 89190BAD0 SHARES DUE 2/15/2018 $0.00147/PV ON 520,000.00 PV DUE 2/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 762.67 - - - 2/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON TOYOTA AUTO 1.730 % 2/16/21 $1 PV ON 542.0700 89238MAD0 SHARES DUE 2/15/2018 $0.00144/PV ON 376,000.00 PV DUE 2/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 542.07 - - - 2/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON USAA AUTO OWNER 1.700% 5/17/21 $1 PV ON 198.3300 90290AAC1 SHARES DUE 2/15/2018 $0.00142/PV ON 140,000.00 PV DUE 2/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 198.33 - - - 2/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON U S TREASURY NT 1.500% 8/15/20 $1 PV ON 9128282Q2 1458000.0000 SHARES DUE 2/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 10,935.00 - - - 2/16/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF F H L M C M T N 2.375% 2/16/21 /WELLS FARGO 2/15/2018 2/16/2018 3137EAEL9 SECURITIES, LLC/510,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.736 % 510,000.0000 0.997360 - - - (508,653.60) 508,653.60 - - 2/16/2018 2/16/2018 2/16/2018 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y -115,813.8200 1.000000 - - - 115,813.82 (115,813.82)• - - 2/16/2018 2/16/2018 9128282V1 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.375% 9/15/20 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 2,339.78 - - - 2/16/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.375% 9/15/20 /RBS SECURITIES 2/15/2018 2/16/2018 9128282V1 INC./400,000 PAR VALUE AT 97.625 % -400,000.0000 0.976250 - - - 390,500.00 (397,610.50) (7,110.50) 2/20/2018 MME INTEREST EARNED ON BMW VEHICLE LEASE 2.070 % 10/20/20 $1 PV ON 172.5000 05584PAD9 SHARES DUE 2/20/2018 $0.00173/PV ON 100,000.00 PV DUE 2/20/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 172.50 - - 2/20/2018 2/20/2018 2/20/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 9,798.7500 1.000000 - - - (9,798.75) 9,798.75 - 2/20/2018 2/20/2018 2/20/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 223.7500 1.000000 - - - (223.75) 223.75 - 2/20/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON HONDA AUTO 1.790% 9/20/21 $1 PV ON 223.7500 43814PAC4 SHARES DUE 2/18/2018 $0.00149/PV ON 150,000.00 PV DUE 2/18/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 223.75 - - 2/20/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON STATE STREET CORP 2.550% 8/18/20 CURRENT YEAR 857477AS2 AMORTIZATION li 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - (351.91) _ - 2/20/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON STATE STREET CORP 2.550 % 8/18/20 $1 PV ON 857477AS2 755000.0000 SHARES DUE 2/18/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 9,626.25 - - - 54 Page 29 of 32 IMFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Transaction Report Quarter ended March 31, 2018 Account Number: 001050990415 Transaction Settlement Date Trade Date Date Name: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMM CUSIP Description Units Price Miscellaneous Commissions SEC Fees Fees Net Cash Amount Amount Short Term Long Term Federal Tax Cost Gain/Loss Gain/Loss Amount Amount INTEREST EARNED ON APPLE INC 2.250% 2/23/21 $1 PV ON 500000.0000 0 nnnnnn 2/23/2018 2/23/2018 2/23/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 5,625.0000 1.000000 - - - - - (5,625.00) 5,625.00 - - - - - 2/26/2018 TRUST FEES COLLECTED CHARGED FOR PERIOD 01/01/2018 THRU 01/31/2018 COLLECTED BY DISBURSEMENT 0.0000 0.000000 - (528.81) - - 2/26/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON BMW VEHICLE OWNER 1.160 % 11/25/20 $1 PV ON 05582QAD9 439.8300 SHARES DUE 2/25/2018 $0.00097/PV ON 455,000.00 PV DUE 2/25/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 439.83 - - 2/26/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B 1.56135% 6/25/20 $1 PV ON 510000.0000 3133EHRZ8 SHARES DUE 2/25/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 685.69 2/26/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B DEB 1.57014% 8/24/20 $1 PV ON 130000.0000 3133EHVR1 SHARES DUE 2/24/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 175.77 - - - 2/26/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F N M A DEB 1.000% 2/26/19 $1 PV ON 500000.0000 3135G0J53 SHARES DUE 2/26/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 2,500.00 2/26/2018 2/25/2018 2/26/2018 3136AMTM1 PAID DOWN PAR VALUE OF F N M A GTD REMIC 1.186% 9/25/18-14,380.0400 0.000000 - - - 14,380.04 (14,376.36) - 3.68 2/26/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F N M A GTD REMIC 1.186% 9/25/18 $1 PV ON 178.4900 3136AMTM1 SHARES DUE 2/25/2018 $0.00147/PV ON 121,572.82 PV DUE 2/25/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 178.49 - - 2/26/2018 2/25/2018 2/26/2018 3137BNN26 PAID DOWN PAR VALUE OF F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19-96.3900 0.010375 - - - 96.39 (96.81) - (0.42) 2/26/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19 CURRENT YEAR 3137BNN26 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - (14.90) - - 2/26/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19 $1 PV ON 84.5300 3137BNN26 SHARES DUE 2/25/2018 $0.00148/PV ON 56,986.24 PV DUE 2/25/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 84.53 - - - 2/26/2018 2/25/2018 2/26/2018 3137BPCF4 PAID DOWN PAR VALUE OF F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.376% 10/25/20-743.7900 0.000000 - - - 743.79 (743.78) - - 0.01 2/26/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.376% 10/25/20 $1 PV ON 219.3900 3137BPCF4 SHARES DUE 2/25/2018 $0.00115/PV ON 191,330.51 PV DUE 2/25/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 219.39 - - 2/26/2018 2/26/2018 2/26/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y Mr 17,831.0100 1.000000 - - - (17,831.01) 17,831.01 - - 2/26/2018 2/26/2018 2/26/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 1,144.1000 1.000000 - - - (1,144.10) 1,144.10 - - 2/28/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F N M A 1.000% 8/28/19 $1 PV ON 510000.0000 3135G0P49 SHARES DUE 2/28/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 2,550.00 - - - 2/28/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F N M A DEB 1.500 % 2/28/20 $1 PV ON 300000.0000 3135GOT29 SHARES DUE 2/28/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - 2,250.00 - - - 2/28/2018 2/28/2018 2/28/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 21,543.7500 1.000000 = - - (21,543.75) 21,543.75 - - 2/28/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON U S TREASURY NT 1.250A 8/31/19 $1 PV ON 9128282T6 2679000.0000 SHARES DUE 2/28/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 16,743.75 - - - 3/1/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON CALIFORNIA ST BUILD 6.650% 3/01/22 CURRENT YEAR 13063BFS6 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - (2,527.23) - - 3/1/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON CALIFORNIA ST BUILD 6.650% 3/01/22 $1 PV ON 13063BFS6 425000.0000 SHARES DUE 3/1/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 14,131.25 - - - 3/1/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON EXXON MOBIL 2.222% 3/01/21 $1 PV ON 500000.0000 30231GAV4 SHARES DUE 3/1/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 5,555.00 - - - 3/1/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B DEB 1.6447% 8/01/22 $1 PV ON 230000.0000 3133EHTJ2 SHARES DUE 3/1/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 294.22 3/1/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y UNIT ON 0.0000 SHARES DUE 31846V203 2/28/2018 INTEREST FROM 2/1/18 TO 2/28/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 218.45 3/1/2018 3/1/2018 3/1/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 30,499.2200 1.000000 - - - (30,499.22) 30,499.22 3/1/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON LOS ANGELES CA 1.125% 9/01/19 $1 PV ON 54465AGK2 270000.0000 SHARES DUE 3/1/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 1,518.75 - - 3/1/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON NEW YORK ST REF SER 3.600% 9/01/19 CURRENT 649791EJ5 YEAR AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - (1,585.15) - - 3/1/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON NEW YORK ST REF SER 3.600% 9/01/19 $1 PV ON 649791EJ5 500000.0000 SHARES DUE 3/1/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 9,000.00 r - - - 3/2/2018 3/2/2018 3/2/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 218.4500 1.000000 - - - (218.45) 218.45 - - 3/5/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON CHEVRON CORP 2.0398% 3/03/22 $1 PV ON 166764AU4 500000.0000 SHARES DUE 3/3/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 2,549.74 - - - 3/5/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON CHEVRON CORP 2.0398% 3/03/22 CURRENT YEAR 166764AU4 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - (201.25) - - 3/5/2018 3/5/2018 3/5/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y N 1 2,549.7400 1.000000 - - - (2,549.74) 2,549.74 - - 3/6/2018 3/6/2018 13063DDD7 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF CALIFORNIA ST 2.250% 10/01/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 2,153.13 - - - 3/6/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF CALIFORNIA ST 2.250% 10/01/19 /RAYMOND 3/2/2018 3/6/2018 13063DDD7 JAMES/FI/265,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.92 % I -265,000.0000 0.999200 - - - 264,788.00 (266,127.99) (1,339.99) - 3/6/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON CALIFORNIA ST 2.250 % 10/01/19 CURRENT YEAR 13063DDD7 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - (125.84) - - 3/6/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B 1.65957% 9/06/22 $1 PV ON 260000.0000 3133EHXH1 SHARES DUE 3/6/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 335.60 - - - 3/6/2018 3/6/2018 3/6/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 4,856.9300 1.000000 - - - (4,856.93) 4,856.93 - 3/6/2018 3/6/2018 9128283Y4 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF U S TREASURY NT 2.250% 2/29/20 11 0.0000 0.000000 - - (97.21) ' ■ 3/6/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF U S TREASURY NT 2.250% 2/29/20 /BMO CAPITAL 3/2/2018 3/6/2018 9128283Y4 MARKETS PAR VALUE 265,000.0000 1.000078 - - 020.70) 2=0.7165 0) 3/6/2018 AMORTIZED PRE/BONDS/265,000 MIIUM ON WELLS ARGO MTNT 2.115849% 12/06/19 CURRENT Mr94988J5J2 YEAR AMORTIZATION F 0.0000 0.000000 3/6/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON WELLS FARGO MTN 2.15849% 12/06/19 $1 PV ON 94988J5J2 500000.0000 SHARES DUE 3/6/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - 2,698.11 - - a� 3/7/2018 3/7/2018 3/7/2018 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y-32,675.0700 1.000000 - - 32,675.07 (32,675.07) - - 3/7/2018 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF SAN FRANCISCO CA 2.387% 3/7/2018 797669XU7 7/01/21 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 549.01 - - - 55 Page 30 of 32 IMFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Transaction Report Quarter ended March 31, 2018 Account Number: 001050990415 Transaction Settlement Date Trade Date Date Name: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMM CUSIP Description Units Price Miscellaneous Commissions SEC Fees Fees Net Cash Amount Amount Short Term Long Term Federal Tax Cost Gain/Loss Gain/Loss Amount Amount SOLD PAR VALUE OF SAN FRANCISCO CA 2.387% 7/01/21 /MESIROW FINANCIAL J///LU Ia 3/7/2018 .b/LU Ia a/NLU Ia IV/ UotlAU/ 70 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF STATE STREET CORP 2.550 % 3/7/2018 857477AS2 8/18/20 - - ILL/ ,000.UUUU 0.0000 U.tlBJLDU - - 0.000000 - - - I lb, I VU.UU - (44.41) tILU,000.UU) - to IU.UU) - - - 3/7/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF STATE STREET CORP 2.550% 8/18/20 /UBS 3/5/2018 3/7/2018 857477AS2 SECURITIES LLC/33,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.314 % 33,000.0000 0.993140 - - - (32,773.62) 32,773.62 - - 3/7/2018 3/7/2018 9128283X6 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF U S TREASURY NT 2.250% 2/15/21 0.0000 0.000000 - - - (149.17) - - - 3/7/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF U S TREASURY NT 2.250% 2/15/21 /RBS 3/5/2018 3/7/2018 9128283X6 SECURITIES INC./120,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.53906667 % 120,000.0000 0.995391 (119,446.88) 119,446.88 - 3/12/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B 1.59077 % 12/11/20 $1 PV ON 510000.0000 3133EH2J1 SHARES DUE 3/11/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 631.01 - - 3/12/2018 3/12/2018 3/12/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 249,432.7900 1.000000 - - - (249,432.79) 249,432.79 - 3/12/2018 3/12/2018 3/12/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 631.0100 1.000000 - - - (631.01) 631.01 3/12/2018 3/12/2018 91412GS71 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF UNIVERSITY OF CA 1.610 % 5/15/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 130.81 - SOLD PAR VALUE OF UNIVERSITY OF CA 1.610% 5/15/19 /UBS FINANCIAL 3/12/2018 3/8/2018 3/12/2018 91412GS71 SERVICES INC./25,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.285 % -25,000.0000 0.992850 - - - 24,821.25 25,000.00) 178.75 3/12/2018 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF UNIV CALIFORNIA CA 1.796% 3/12/2018 91412GSB2 7/01/19 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 796.98 - 3/12/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF UNIV CALIFORNIA CA 1.796% 7/01/19 /UBS FINANCIAL 3/8/2018 3/12/2018 91412GSB2 SERVICES INC./225,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.415 % -225,000.0000 0.994150 - - - 223,683.75 (225,621.47) (1,937.72 - 3/12/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON UNIV CALIFORNIA CA 1.796% 7/01/19 CURRENT YEAR 91412GSB2 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - (94.83) 3/13/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B DEB 1.6632% 7/13/22 $1 PV ON 310000.0000 3133EHRD7 SHARES DUE 3/13/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 401.02 - 3/13/2018 3/13/2018 3/13/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 401.0200 1.000000 - - - (401.02) 401.02 -- 3/14/2018 PAR VALUE OF F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19 ADJUSTED BY 96.3900 3137BNN26 NOTIONAL 96.3900 0.000000 - - - - - 3/14/2018 BOOK VALUE OF F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19 ADJUSTED BY 96.81 3137BNN26 NOTIONAL 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - - 3/14/2018 FED BASIS OF F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19 ADJUSTED BY 96.81 3137BNN26 NOTIONAL 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 96.81 3/14/2018 STATE COST OF F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19 ADJUSTED BY 96.81 3137BNN26 NOTIONAL 0.0000 0.000000 - - 3/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON AMERICAN EXPRESS 1.640% 12/15/21 $1 PV ON 02582JHG8 420000.0000 SHARES DUE 3/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 574.00 3/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON AUTOMATIC DATA 2.250% 9/15/20 $1 PV ON 053015AD5 450000.0000 SHARES DUE 3/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 5,062.50 3/15/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON AUTOMATIC DATA 2.250% 9/15/20 CURRENT YEAR 053015AD5 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - 6) - - 3/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY 2.200% 3/15/21 $1 PV ON 0846706Q0 471000.0000 SHARES DUE 3/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 5,181.00 - - - 3/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST 1.370% 6/15/21 $1 PV ON 161571HC1 750000.0000 SHARES DUE 3/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 856.25 - - - 3/15/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST 1.370% 6/15/21 CURRENT 161571HC1 YEAR AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - (6.98) - - 3/15/2018 3/15/2018 3/15/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 1,890.0800 1.000000 - - - (1,890.08) 1,890.08 - - 3/15/2018 3/15/2018 3/15/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 20,138.2400 1.000000 - - - (20,138.24) 20,138.24 - - 3/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON JOHN DEERE OWNER 1.780% 4/15/21 $1 PV ON 47787XAC1 310000.0000 SHARES DUE 3/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 459.83 - - - 3/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON MERCEDES BENZ AUTO 1.790% 4/15/20 $1 PV ON 58769DAD2 551.9200 SHARES DUE 3/15/2018 $0.00149/PV ON 370,000.00 PV DUE 3/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 551.92 - - - 3/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON NISSAN AUTO LEASE 2.050% 9/15/20 $1 PV ON 375.8300 65479BAD2 SHARES DUE 3/15/2018 $0.00171/PV ON 220,000.00 PV DUE 3/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 375.83 - - - 3/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON SANTANDER DRIVE 1.770% 9/15/20 $1 PV ON 162.2500 80284TAF2 SHARES DUE 3/15/2018 $0.00148/PV ON 110,000.00 PV DUE 3/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 162.25 - - - 3/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON TOYOTA AUTO 1.760% 7/15/21 $1 PV ON 762.6700 89190BAD0 SHARES DUE 3/15/2018 $0.00147/PV ON 520,000.00 PV DUE 3/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 762.67 - - - 3/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON TOYOTA AUTO 1.730% 2/16/21 $1 PV ON 542.0700 89238MAD0 SHARES DUE 3/15/2018 $0.00144/PV ON 376,000.00 PV DUE 3/15/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 542.07 - - - 3/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON USAA AUTO OWNER 1.700% 5/17/21 $1 PV ON 90290AAC1 140000.0000 SHARES DUE 3/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 198.33 - - - 3/15/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON U S TREASURY NT 1.000% 3/15/19 $1 PV ON 912828P95 1500000.0000 SHARES DUE 3/15/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 7,500.00 - - - 3/15/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON U S TREASURY NT 1.000% 3/15/19 CURRENT YEAR 912828P95 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - (142.31) - - 3/16/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF F H L B DEB 2.375% 3/30/20 /CITIGROUP 3/15/2018 3/16/2018 3130ADUJ9 GLOBAL MARKETS INC./930,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.982 % 930,000.0000 0.999820 - - - (929,832.60) 929,832.60 - - 3/16/2018 3/16/2018 3/16/2018 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y -1,914.5200 1.000000 - - - 1,914.52 (1,914.52) - - 3/16/2018 SOLD PAR VALUE OF U S TREASURY NT 2.000% 1/31/20 /RBS SECURITIES 3/15/2018 3/16/2018 9128283S7 INC./930,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.511718 % -930,000.0000 0.995117 - - - 925,458.98 (927,892.97) (2,433.99) - 3/16/2018 3/16/2018 9128283S7 RECEIVED ACCRUED INTEREST ON SALE OF U S TREASURY NT 2.000% 1/31/20 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 2,260.77 - - - 3/19/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F H L B DEB 1.375% 3/18/19 $1 PV ON 520000.0000 3130AAXX1 SHARES DUE 3/18/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 3,575.00 - - - 56 Page 31 of 32 IMFRIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Payden & Rygel Operating Portfolio Transaction Report Quarter ended March 31, 2018 Account Number: 001050990415 Transaction Settlement Name: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANS COMM Miscellaneous Federal Tax Cost Short Term Gain/Loss Long Term Gain/Loss 3/19/2018 3/19/2018 3/19/2018 3/19/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 3,575.0000 1.000000 - (3,575.00) 3,575.00 223.75 - - 3/19/2018 3/19/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y INTEREST EARNED ON HONDA AUTO 1.790 % 9/20/21 $1 PV ON 223.7500 43814PAC4 SHARES DUE 3/18/2018 $0.00149/PV ON 150,000.00 PV DUE 3/18/18 223.7500 0.0000 1.000000 - - 0.000000 - - - (223.75) - - 3/19/2018 - 223.75 - - - 3/20/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON BMW VEHICLE LEASE 2.070 % 10/20/20 $1 PV ON 172.5000 05584PAD9 SHARES DUE 3/20/2018 $0.00173/PV ON 100,000.00 PV DUE 3/20/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 172.50 - - - 3/20/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.400 % 9/20/19 $1 PV ON 17275RBG6 40000.0000 SHARES DUE 3/20/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 280.00 - - - 3/20/2018 3/20/2018 3/20/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 452.5000 1.000000 - - - (452.50) 452.50 - - 3/22/2018 PAR VALUE OF F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19 ADJUSTED BY-96.3900 3137BNN26 ADJUSTMENT TO BRING INTO BALANCE -96.3900 0.000000 - - - - - - 3/22/2018 BOOK VALUE OF F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19 ADJUSTED BY -96.81 3137BNN26 ADJUSTMENT TO BRING INTO BALANCE 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - - 3/22/2018 FED BASIS OF F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19 ADJUSTED BY -96.81 3137BNN26 ADJUSTMENT TO BRING INTO BALANCE 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - 96.81 3/22/2018 STATE COST OF F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19 ADJUSTED BY -96.81 3137BNN26 ADJUSTMENT TO BRING INTO BALANCE 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - 3/23/2018 3/23/2018 3/23/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 4,571.4300 1.000000 - - - (4,571.43) 4,571.43 3/23/2018 3/23/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON JP MORGAN MTN 2.26464% 9/23/19 $1 PV ON 48125LRJ3 845000.0000 SHARES DUE 3/23/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 4,571.43 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON JP MORGAN MTN 2.26464% 9/23/19 CURRENT YEAR 48125LRJ3 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - 679.93 3/26/2018 TRUST FEES COLLECTED CHARGED FOR PERIOD 02/01/2018 THRU 02/28/2018 COLLECTED BY DISBURSEMENT 0.0000 0.000000 - - - (528.70) 3/26/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON BMW VEHICLE OWNER 1.160% 11/25/20 $1 PV ON 05582QAD9 439.8300 SHARES DUE 3/25/2018 $0.00097/PV ON 455,000.00 PV DUE 3/25/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 439.83 - - - 3/26/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B DEB 1.6207% 6/25/20 $1 PV ON 510000.0000 3133EHRZ8 SHARES DUE 3/25/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 642.88 - - - 3/26/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F F C B DEB 1.6307% 8/24/20 $1 PV ON 130000.0000 3133EHVR1 SHARES DUE 3/24/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 164.88 - - - 3/26/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F N M A GTD REMIC 1.186% 9/25/18 $1 PV ON 147.3600 3136AMTM1 SHARES DUE 3/25/2018 $0.00137/PV ON 107,192.78 PV DUE 3/25/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 147.36 - - - 3/26/2018 3/25/2018 3/26/2018 3136AMTM1 PAID DOWN PAR VALUE OF F N M A GTD REMIC 1.186% 9/25/18 -46,614.2000 0.000000 - - - 46,614.20 (46,602.25) - 11.95 3/26/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19 $1 PV ON 84.3900 3137BNN26 SHARES DUE 3/25/2018 $0.00148/PV ON 56,889.85 PV DUE 3/25/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 84.39 - - - 3/26/2018 AMORTIZED PREMIUM ON F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19 CURRENT YEAR 3137BNN26 AMORTIZATION 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - (13.43) - - 3/26/2018 3/25/2018 3/26/2018 3137BNN26 PAID DOWN PAR VALUE OF F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.780% 7/25/19 -2,052.7100 0.000000 - - - 2,052.71 (2,061.14) - (8.43) 3/26/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.376% 10/25/20 $1 PV ON 218.5400 3137BPCF4 SHARES DUE 3/25/2018 $0.00115/PV ON 190,586.72 PV DUE 3/25/18 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 218.54 - - - 3/26/2018 3/25/2018 3/26/2018 3137BPCF4 PAID DOWN PAR VALUE OF F H L M C MLTCL MTG 1.376% 10/25/20 -955.3600 0.000000 - - - 955.36 (955.35) - 0.01 3/26/2018 3/26/2018 3/26/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 50,791.4500 1.000000 - - - (50,791.45) 50,791.45 - - 3/27/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F H L B DEB 1.515% 6/27/19 $1 PV ON 770000.0000 3130ABMP8 SHARES DUE 3/27/2018 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 2,916.38 - - - 3/27/2018 3/27/2018 3/27/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 2,916.3800 1.000000 - - - (2,916.38) 2,916.38 - - 3/28/2018 INTEREST EARNED ON F H L B 1.375% 9/28/20 $1 PV ON 360000.0000 0.0000 0.000000 - - - 2,475.00 - - - 3130ACE26 SHARES DUE 3/28/2018 3/28/2018 3/28/2018 3/28/2018 31846V203 PURCHASED UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y 2,475.0000 1.000000 - - (2,475.00) 2,475.00 - - 3/29/2018 1 3/29/2018 3/29/2018 31846V203 SOLD UNITS OF FIRST AM GOVT OB FD CL Y -500,868.5700 1.000000 - - 500,868.57 (500,868.57) 499,585.26 - - - - 3/29/2018 3/28/2018 PURCHASED PAR VALUE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.435% 1/31/20 /BARCLAYS 3/29/2018 9128283T5 CAPITAL INC. FIXED IN/500,000 PAR VALUE AT 99.917052 % 500,000.0000 0.999171 - 499,585.26) 3/29/2018 . . 3/29/2018 9128283T5 PAID ACCRUED INTEREST ON PURCHASE OF U S TREASURY NT 1.435% 1/31/20 . 0.0000 0.000000 - - - - - Total - - - (0.00) 131,997.81 (74,696.36) (13,449.21) 57 Page 32 of 32 ATTACHMENT 17 LOGANCIRCLE P A R T NER S A MetLife Affiliate Riverside County Transportation Commission SHORT DURATION FIXED INCOME April 23, 2018 Logan Circle Partners, L.P. ■ 25 Deforest Avenue Summit, NJ 07901 ■ 908-376-0550 58 FIRM HIGHLIGHTS Business Structure MetLife Insurance LCP Employees Investment Management (MIM) I Logan Circle Partners 81 Employees (as of 3/31/2018) Portfolio Management 10 Research 20 Trading 13 Risk Management / Portfolio Analytics 4 Client Services 13 Legal / Compliance 5 Administration / Operations 16 ➢ Logan Circle Partners, L.P. ("Logan Circle" or "LCP") is a MetLife, Inc. company and is part of MetLife Investment Management, MetLife Inc.'s Institutional Investment Management Business. ➢ We are dedicated solely to the institutional marketplace and have $38.5 billion' in total assets under management. ➢ The senior members of our Investment team have worked together on fixed income portfolios for 20 years. ➢ Suite of fixed income investment strategies includes broad coverage of both the risk spectrum (Enhanced Cash to High Yield) and the term structure (Short - Term to Long Duration). LCP Institutional Clients Assets by Client Typel (Millions as of 12/31/2017) Corporate $15,718 Sub -Advisory $14,769 Public $3,339 Insurance $1,408 Other $3,222 TOTAL: $38,456 Based on unaudited estimates and are subject to change. Fee paying assets under management as of 12/31/17. LoGANCIRCLE P A R T N ER 5 A MetLife Affiliate 59 MARKET REVIEW Outlook and Current Themes ➢ GDP - The tax reform package's tangible benefits will raise the pace of economic growth. However, based on recent weakness in retail sales, Q1 GDP is on track to be below our expected 2 % to 3% real growth rate for 2018. Government contribution to GDP will rise due to the significant increase in federal spending slated for 2018 and beyond. Incentives such as accelerated depreciation and repatriated cash built into tax reform package portend a meaningful increase in business fixed investment. A pickup in wage growth will help sustain the strength in consumer spending, a key driver of growth. ➢ Business - Solid corporate fundamentals further supported by tax reform and regulatory rollback. Specifically, interest coverage as well as revenue and earnings growth are near cycle highs, although non -financial issuers' debt and leverage metrics remain elevated at this late stage of the credit cycle. Imposition of tariffs could spark a trade war which would have negative implications for multinationals, supporting our bias towards U.S.-centric sectors such as financials, telecom, energy and utilities. Tax -driven repatriation -related flows have disproportionately impacted corporate bond valuations at the front end of the maturity spectrum. ➢ Consumer - Consumer spending continues to be supported by a strong labor market and positive wealth effects. Benefits of higher take-home pay from tax cuts and rising wages will boost consumption in coming quarters. Recent weakness in retail sales at odds with consumer confidence measures but should prove transitory. Low savings rate and elevated household debt bear watching over the medium term, as a continuation of these trends would create headwinds to future growth. ➢ Employment - Further increase in labor force participation could limit decline in unemployment rate. Tight labor markets expected to translate into higher wages given the shallow pool of qualified workers. Average hourly earnings growth has been tempered recently by newer labor force entrants at the lower end of the wage scale. The seasonally -adjusted U.S. Quits Rate remains near post -recession highs, indicative of employee confidence in finding another job, a further sign of labor market strength. ➢ Inflation - Inflation readings to move higher as baseline effects such as wireless plan and prescription drug costs normalize. Healthcare service costs, the second-largest category in Core CPI, expected to trend higher from current levels as physician services and health insurance expenses rise. Tight labor market and increased corporate optimism are expected to put upward pressure on wages, which will feed into service inflation measures. Extension of OPEC agreement to limit oil supply through year-end 2018 should support energy prices and, in turn, higher headline inflation. Recently imposed tariffs and prospects for more aggressive stance on trade have the potential to lift inflation over the short run. ➢ U.S. Monetary & Fiscal Policy - FOMC's voter composition tilts more hawkish as expectations for the federal funds rate in 2019 and 2020 are set higher at Federal Reserve Chair Powell's first meeting. Uncertainty remains regarding appointments to fill the Fed's open seats while talk of making each Fed meeting "live", if carried out, could raise interest rate volatility. Accommodative fiscal policy and growing federal deficits with an uncapped borrowing authority until March 2019 is a cause for concern. In addition, the impact of the Federal Reserve's plan to shrink its balance sheet by scaling back its reinvestment of Treasury and mortgage -backed maturities will intensify, putting additional technical pressure on markets. ➢ Central Banks / International - Draghi and ECB continue to put off plans for definitively ending their QE program and historic level of monetary policy accommodation. Upcoming changes to ECB and EU leadership could add to an already unsettled political environment. BOJ remains accommodative as efforts to spur growth and achieve inflation target have fallen short of expectations. Escalating U.S./China trade tensions could have far-reaching implications for various asset classes and financial markets. In addition, upcoming elections in Mexico and the U.S. may impact negotiations over the reworking of NAFTA. ➢ Residential / Commercial Real Estate - With single family housing starts below long-term averages, home prices will continue to be supported by a lack of supply and steady demand from rising household formations. Higher interest rates and tax law changes, however, reduce affordability and become a headwind for higher priced homes in particular. Rising vacancy trends for hotels and weakness in retail properties present challenges for commercial real estate as the market enters the later stage of the credit cycle. The views presented above are Logan Circle's and are subject to change over time. There can be no assurance that the views expressed above will prove accurate and should not be relied upon as a reliable indicator of future events. LOGANCIRCLE P A R T NERS A Met Life Affiliate 60 PORTFOLIO REVIEW — Debt Reserve Fund Portfolio Characteristics As of December 31, 2017 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 2.35% Duration 4.13 Years Average Quality (Moody's) Aaa As of March 31, 2018 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 2.75% Duration 3.69 Years Average Quality (Moody's) Aaa Asset Allocation RMBS Money 6% Markets 1% Portfolio Performance' 1Q 2018 Since Inception (8/1/2013) Total Debt Service Fund (Gross of Fees) -0.86% 1.84% Total Debt Service Fund (Net of Fees) -0.88% 1.75% ICE BofAML U.S. Treasury Index 3-7 Year -0.91 % 1.36% Excess Return +5 +48 Past Performance is not indicative of future results. Performance returns for periods greater than one year are annualized. The performance benchmark shown for the Riverside County Debt Reserve Fund is the ICE BofAML US Treasury 3-7 Year, which is a broad -based index consisting of U.S. Treasury securities with an outstanding par greater or equal to $25 million and a maturity range from three to seven years, inclusive, reflecting total return. LOGANCIRCLE P A R T N ER 5 A Met Life Affiliate 61 4 PORTFOLIO REVIEW — 2017 Toll Revenue 1-15 Project Fund Portfolio Characteristics CMBS As of December 31, 2017 Actual Portfolio 2% Municipal 4% Yield to Maturity 1.71 % Duration 0.61 Years Average Quality (Moody's) Aa3 Asset Allocation As of March 31, 2018 Actual Portfolio RMBS 1% Municipal 3% Yield to Maturity 2.30% Duration 0.57 Years Average Quality (Moody's) Aa3 Discount Notes 7% CP 3% Discount Notes 6% Portfolio Performance' 1 Q 2018 Since Inception (8/1/2017) 2017 Toll Revenue 1-15 Project Fund (Gross of Fees) 0.19% 0.63% 2017 Toll Revenue 1-15 Project Fund (Net of Fees) 0.17% 0.56% ICE BofAML U.S. Treasury Index 0-2 Year 0.18% 0.32% Excess Return +1 +31 'Past performance is not indicative of future results. The Since Inception performance retums of the portfolio is as of the first full month following the funding date. The performance benchmark shown for the Riverside County 115 Express Lanes 2017 Toll Revenue Project Portfolio is the ICE BofAML 0-2 Year U.S. Treasury Index, which is a broad -based index consisting of U.S. Treasury securities with an outstanding par greater than or equal to $250 million and a maturity range from zero to two years, reflecting total return. LOGANCIRCLE P A R T N ER 5 A Met Life Affiliate 62 5 PORTFOLIO REVIEW — 1-15 Express Lanes Sales Tax Revenue Fund Portfolio Characteristics As of December 31, 2017 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 1.92% Duration 0.59 Years Average Quality (Moody's) Aa3 As of March 31, 2018 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 2.38% Duration 0.59 Years Average Quality (Moody's) Aa3 Asset Allocation CD 3% Municipal RMBS CMBS 1% 1% 1% Discount Notes 4% Portfolio Performancel 1Q 2018 Since Inception (8/1/2017) 1-15 Express Lanes Sales Tax Revenue Fund (Gross of Fees) 0.17% 0.67% 1-15 Express Lanes Sales Tax Revenue Fund (Net of Fees) 0.15% 0.60% ICE BofAML U.S. Treasury Index 0-2 Year 0.18% 0.32% Excess Return -1 +35 'Past performance is not indicative of future results. The Since Inception performance return is as of the first full month following the funding date. The performance benchmark shown for the Riverside County 115 Express Lanes Project Sales Tax Revenue Portfolio is the ICE BofAML 0-2 Year U.S. Treasury Index, which is a broad -based index consisting of U.S. Treasury securities with an outstanding par greater than or equal to $250 million and a maturity range from zero to two years, reflecting total return. LOGANCIRCLE P A R T N ER S A Met Life Affiliate 63 6 PORTFOLIO REVIEW — 2017 Toll Revenue 1-15 Ramp Up Reserve Portfolio Characteristics As of December 31, 2017 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 1.64% Duration 0.54 Years Average Quality (Moody's) Aaa As of March 31, 2018 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 2.28% Duration 0.98 Years Average Quality (Moody's) Aaa Asset Allocation Discount Notes 3% Portfolio Performancel Since Inception (1/1/2018) 2017 Toll Revenue 1-15 Ramp Up Reserve (Gross of Fees) 0.29% 2017 Toll Revenue 1-15 Ramp Up Reserve (Net of Fees) 0.27% ICE BofAML U.S. Treasury Index 1-3 Year -0.13% Excess Return +42 'Past performance is not indicative of future results. Inception date 12/5/17. Performance retums are calculated as of the first full month following the funding date. The performance benchmark shown for the Riverside County 115 Express Lanes Toll Revenue Reserve Portfolio is the ICE BofAML 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Index, which is a broad -based index consisting of U.S. Treasury securities with an outstanding pargreater than or equal to $250 million and a maturity range from one to three years, reflecting total return. LOGANCIRCLE P A R T N ER 5 A Met Life Affiliate 64 7 PORTFOLIO REVIEW — 2013 SR-91 Project Residual Portfolio Characteristics As of March 31, 2018 Actual Portfolio Yield to Maturity 2.42% Duration 1.09 Years Average Quality (Moody's) Aa2 Asset Allocation Municipal CMBS 3% , 4% Discount Notes 4% Portfolio Performancel Since Inception (2/1/2018) Riverside County 2013 SR-91 Project Residual Fund (Gross of Fees) 0.06% Riverside County 2013 SR-91 Project Residual Fund (Net of Fees) 0.04% ICE BofAML U.S. Treasury Index 1-3 Year 0.16% Excess Return -10 1 Past performance is not indicative of future results. Inception date 1/4/18. Performance retums are calculated as of the first full month following the funding date. The performance benchmark shown for the Riverside County 2013 Residual Fund Portfolio is the ICE BofAML 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Index, which is a broad -based index consisting of U.S. Treasury securities with an outstanding par greater than or equal to $250 million and a maturity range from one to three years, reflecting total return. LOGANCIRCLE P A R T N ER 5 A Met Life Affiliate 65 8 RCTC PORTFOLIOS 2013 SR 91 Project Funds Portfolio Market Value (7/3/2013) Net Flows Market Value Change in (12/31/2017) Market Value Construction (Sales Tax) $332,687,595 ($334,894,805) +$2,207,210 Construction (Toll Revenue) $122,120,571 ($122,810,850) +$690,279 Total Construction Funds $454,808,167 ($457,705,654) +$2,897,489 Portfolio Market Value (7/3/2013) Net Flows Market Value Change in (12/31/2017) Market Value Capitalized Interest (Sales Tax) $103,683,353 ($106,840,463) - +$3,157,110 Capitalized Interest (Toll Revenue) $31,416,498 ($32,491,024) - +$1,074,526 Total Capitalized Interest Funds $135,099,851 ($139,331,487) +$4,231,636 Portfolio Market Value Net Flows Market Value Change in (6110/2015) (12/31/2017) Market Value Equity Contribution $32,793,399 ($34,123,338) +$1,329,939 Portfolio Market Value (713/2013) Net Flows Market Value Change in (3131/2018) Market Value Debt Service Reserve Fund $17,667,869 ($1,442,408) $17,806,819 +$1,581,358 LOGANCIRCLE P A R T NERS A Met Life Affiliate 66 RCTC PORTFOLIOS 2017 1-15 Project and 91 Residual Funds Portfolio Beginning Market Value (7/24/2017) Net Flows Market Value Change in (3/31/2018) Market Value 2017 Toll Revenue 1-15 Project Fund $98,562,718 ($14,823,299) $84,352,583 +$613,163 1-15 Express 2017 Project Sales Tax Revenue $56,043,134 ($30,830,907) $25,532,645 +$320,418 Beginning Market Value (12/5/2017) 2017 Toll Revenue 1-15 Ramp Up Reserve $7,723,487 +32,882 $7,845,229 +$30,842 Total Project $154,605,852 ($45,621,324) $117,730,457 +$964,424 Portfolio Beginning Market Value (1/16/2018) Net Flows Market Value Change in (3/31/2018) Market Value 2013 SR-91 Project Residual Fund $3,292,782 0 $3,292,869 +86 LOGANCIRCLE P A R T NERS A Met Life Affiliate 67 DISCLAIMERS In general. This disclaimer applies to this document and the verbal or written comments of any person presenting it. This document, taken together with any such verbal or written comments, is referred to herein as the "Presentation." Logan Circle Partners, L.P., a MetLife, Inc. company, is referred to herein as "Logan Circle" and is part of MetLife, Inc.'s institutional investment management business. No offer to purchase or sell securities. This Presentation is being provided to you, at your specific request. This Presentation does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security and may not be relied upon in connection with the purchase or sale of any security. Projections. Projections contained in this Presentation are based on a variety of estimates and assumptions by Logan Circle, including, among others, estimates of future operating results, the value of assets and market conditions at the time of disposition, and the timing and manner of disposition or other realization events. These estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and are subject to numerous business, industry, market, regulatory, competitive and financial risks that are outside of Logan Circle's control. There can be no assurance that the assumptions made in connection with the projections will prove accurate, and actual results may differ materially, including the possibility that an investor may lose some or all of its invested capital. The inclusion of the projections herein should not be regarded as an indication that Logan Circle or any of its affiliates considers the projections to be a reliable prediction of future events and the projections should not be relied upon as such. Neither Logan Circle nor any of its affiliates or representatives has made or makes any representation to any person regarding the projections and none of them intends to update or otherwise revise the projections to reflect circumstances existing after the date when made or to reflect the occurrence of future events, if any or all of the assumptions underlying the projections are later shown to be in error. For purposes of this paragraph, the term "projections" includes "targeted returns". Past performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results and should not be relied upon as the basis for making an investment decision. The information presented is only available for institutional client use. No reliance, no update and use of information. You may not rely on this Presentation as the basis upon which to make an investment decision. To the extent that you rely on this Presentation in connection with any investment decision, you do so at your own risk. This Presentation is being provided in summary fashion and does not purport to be complete. The information in the Presentation is provided to you as of the dates indicated and Logan Circle does not intend to update the information after its distribution, even in the event that the information becomes materially inaccurate. Certain information contained in this Presentation includes performance and characteristics of Logan Circle's strategies and any represented benchmarks, which may derive from calculations or figures that have been provided by independent third parties, or have been prepared internally and have not been audited or verified. Use of different methods for preparing, calculating or presenting information may lead to different results for the information presented, compared to publicly quoted information, and such differences may be material. Knowledge and experience. You acknowledge that you are knowledgeable and experienced with respect to the financial, tax and business aspects of this Presentation and that you will conduct your own independent financial, business, regulatory, accounting, legal and tax investigations with respect to the accuracy, completeness and suitability of this Presentation should you choose to use or rely on this Presentation, at your own risk, for any purpose. Risk of loss. An investment in the strategy will be highly speculative and there can be no assurance that the strategy's investment objectives will be achieved. Investors must be prepared to bear the risk of a total loss of their investment. Distribution of this Presentation. Logan Circle expressly prohibits any reproduction, in hard -copy, electronic or any other form, or any redistribution to any third party of this Presentation without the prior written consent of Logan Circle. This Presentation is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use is contrary to local law or regulation. No tax, legal or accounting advice. This Presentation is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for (and you shall not construe it as) accounting, legal, regulatory, financial or tax advice or investment recommendations. Any statements of U.S. federal tax consequences contained in this Presentation were not intended to be used and cannot be used to avoid penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or to promote, market or recommend to another party any tax -related matters addressed herein. Confidentiality. By accepting receipt or reading any portion of this Presentation, you agree that you will treat the Presentation confidentially. This reminder should not be read to limit, in any way, the terms of any confidentiality agreement you or your organization may have in place with Logan Circle. ERISA Plan Independent Fiduciary Exception. If you are considering this presentation for an ERISA Plan, you acknowledge and agree that you are the Plan sponsor or are a fiduciary to the Plan and that the Plan has under management or control at least $50 million or you are a (i) Bank, Broker Dealer, Registered Investment Adviser, or Insurance Company, (ii) are independent of Logan Circle Partners and affiliates of MetLife, Inc., and (iii) are capable of evaluating the engagement of Logan Circle Partners as an investment adviser. During the sales process and pursuant to the negotiation of the investment advisory agreement, Logan Circle Partners will not undertake to provide impartial investment advice, or to give advice in a fiduciary capacity. LOGANCIRCLE P A R T NERS A MetLife Affiliate 6s 11 ATTACHMENT 18 Payden&Rygel QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO REVIEW Riverside County Transportation Commission 1st Quarter 2018 I wr PAYDEN.COM LOS ANGELES I BOSTON I LONDON I MILAN 69 LETTER FROM THE CEO April 2018 The first quarter was a tale of two forces. On the one hand, the U.S. and global economic data continued to impress. The International Monetary Fund revised up its forecast for 2018 global growth by 0.2% to 3.9%, which would be the best global growth rate in nearly a decade. The U.S. added over 600,000 jobs during the first quarter —the best first quarter tally for job growth since Q1 2014. On the other hand, financial markets stumbled. The S&P 500 fell —0.8% and spreads on investment -grade debt widened 16 basis points. How do we make sense of a world where markets diverge from fundamentals? Consider three things: First, the two forces described above are not mutually exclusive. A surprisingly good economic backdrop has forced investors to rethink their views on interest rates. However, in a complex global financial system, you cannot recalibrate one market without ripple effects across others. The rates market repositioning cascaded through other markets. U.S. equities dipped, followed by global equities. Measures of volatility also jumped. Second, the stock market is not the economy, so divergences between the two are not that unusual. We will become more concerned about financial market wobbles if/when the economic backdrop deteriorates. We will be watching the economic data carefully in Q2 for any hints that the wobbles we have seen in markets are feeding back into the underlying fundamentals. Third, we ask: what could derail the global expansion? Political risks are always present but nearly impossible for investors to consistently handicap. If financial conditions tighten more significantly, credit markets may be less forgiving to issuers, and the dollar could rise and impair global USD creditors' ability to repay dollar loans. As investors, we cannot know the future, but must nevertheless prepare. Come what will, we remain keenly focused on diversification and liquidity. Our client portfolios are built to perform in good markets and bad, and we expect 2018 to be no different in that respect. Sincerely, Joan A. Payden President & CEO 70 2812 Riverside County Transportation Commission Portfolio Review and Market Update -1st Quarter 2018 PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS (As of 3/31/2018) Portfolio Market Value Weighted Average Credit Quality Weighted Average Duration Weighted Average Yield to Maturity $51.1 million AA+ 1.51 years 2.38% SECTOR ALLOCATION 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Pc° DURATION DISTRIBUTION 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0-1 1-2 2-3 3+ Years PORTFOLIO RETURNS - Periods Ending 3/31/2018 RCTC Operating Portfolio ICE BofAML 1-3 Year US Treasury Index Periods over one year annualized Since 1st Trailing Inception Quarter 1 Yr (3/1/15) -0.04% 0.42% 0.68% -0.13% 0.03% 0.46% pPayden & Rygel • 333 South Grand Avenue • Los Angeles, California goo71 • (213) 625-igoo • www.payden.com 71 Portfolio Review and Market Update -1st Quarter 2018 2812 MARKET THEMES The first quarter was accentuated by sustained positive economic support, yet volatility increased across capital markets. Strong global growth, which pushed risk assets higher in January, led to concerns by mid -quarter that inflationary pressures could resurface more quickly than expected. This caused markel volatility, as equities fell from their highs and corporate spreads widened off of their tights. Jerome Powell took over as Fed chair and shifted to a more optimistic and hawkish policy tone, hiking at the March meeting, forecasting two more 25 basis point hikes in 2018, and increasing expectations for hikes in 2019 and beyond. Consequently, U.S. interest rates rose, driving front-end yields to levels not seen since 2008. As the U.S. moves away from a zero interest rate policy and companies adjust to tax reform, money markets have normalized. The passing of debt ceiling legislation allowed the U.S. Treasury to increase issuance to the largest net supply since 2010 with a front-end concentration. As a result, Treasury bill yields moved higher and short credit spreads widened, providing attractive yields and increased opportunities in short fixed income. ■ The portfolio holds a diversified mix of credit sectors for income generation. ■ Corporate bond yield premiums widened over the quarter making shorter dated securities more attractive than they have been in years. We expect to be more active in secondary markets while participating in new issues when pricing is supportive. ■ We continue to utilize floating-rate coupon bonds and maintain an underweight duration position in anticipation of higher front-end rates. ■ U.S. Treasury yields moved higher by 30 to 40 basis points across the front-end of the curve, with the two-year maturity rising 0.39% to 2.27%. The slope between two- and five-year maturities finished the quarter roughly unchanged after steepening by 0.15% through mid -February. ■ Our underweight duration position was the main driver of performance over the quarter, as Treasury yields increased. ■ Floating-rate positions contributed positively to performance as three-month LIBOR rose 0.62% to end the quarter at 2.31 %. ■ Corporate securities underperformed Treasuries as spreads widened, which detracted from performance. ■ High -quality asset -backed securities outperformed corporates over the quarter while providing flexible reinvestment opportunities. pPayden & Rygel • 333 South Grand Avenue • Los Angeles, California goo71 • (213) 625-igoo • www.payden.com 72 MARKET PERSPECTIVE Key Macroeconomic Events and the Market Reaction for the First Quarter of 2018 x a) S&P 500 Index (Left Axis) —•—• U.S. Treasury 10-Year Yield (Right Axis) Trump announces tariffs on imports of steel and aluminum. S&P 500 rises more than 6%, recording the best start of the year since the1990s. 7 2900 2800 2700 2600 2 U.S. non -farm payroll report shows wage growth of 2.9% year-over-year,sparking inflation fears. The VIX, Wall Street's "fear gauge," sees the largest single day increase since 1987. Trump announces protectionist measures against China leading to Italian elections held. fears of a"trade war." FOMC raises the Fed Funds target rate to 1.50-1.75%. 2500 T- T I T 1 -- T f T T 1 T 1 I 1 01/02 01/10 01/19 I 01/29 I 02/06 02/14 02/23 03/05 03/13 03/21 03/29 01/05 01/16 01/24 02/01 02/09 02/20 02/28 03/08 03/16 03/26 3 . 0 % 2.9% 2 . 8 % 0 2.7%1<. m a 2.6% 2.5% 2.4% Source: Standard and Poor's, Bank for International Settlements, Bloomberg The first quarter looked poised to be a good one. The S&P 500 Index started 2018 on its hottest win streak since the late 1990s. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) revised up its forecast for 2018 global growth by 0.2% to 3.9%. The January U.S. labor market report showed stellar job and wage growth. And then the markets turned south and volatility spiked as the strong wage data sparked inflation fears. From there, the stock market and 10-year U.S. Treasury bounced up and down for the remainder of the quarter. In the United States despite some financial market volatility, economic forecasts have generally improved for 2018. The quarter came to an end with Fed Chair Jerome Powell announcing the Federal Open Market Committee's (FOMC) decision to raise the Fed Funds rate to 1.50-1.75%—a move that was widely expected. The fact that the March move may have been the first of many this year is still underappreciated, at least by the bond market. Interest rates are rising, though more slowly at longer tenors, even as stocks hold their ground. If growth persists above trend, the unemployment rate falls further, and inflation heads higher over the next couple of years, the path of interest rates will be "steeper" than the market has in mind. What will next quarter's chart look like? 73 I E OVER 30 YEARS OF INSPIRING CONFIDENCE WITH AN UNWAVERING COMMITMENT TO OUR CLIENTS' NEEDS. LOS ANGELES I BOSTON I LONDON I MILAN PAYDEN.COM US DOMICILED MUTUAL FUNDS CASH BALANCE Payden/Kravitz Cash Balance Plan Fund EQUITY Equity Income Fund GLOBAL FIXED INCOME Emerging Markets Bond Fund Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund Emerging Markets Local Bond Fund Global Fixed Income Fund Global Low Duration Fund TAX-EXEMPT FIXED INCOME California Municipal Income Fund U.S. FIXED INCOME Absolute Return Bond Fund Cash Reserves Money Market Fund Core Bond Fund Corporate Bond Fund Floating Rate Fund GNMA Fund High Income Fund Limited Maturity Fund Low Duration Fund Strategic Income Fund U.S. Government Fund DUBLIN DOMICILED UCITS FUNDS EQUITY Global Equity Income Fund US Equity Income Fund LIQUIDITY FUNDS Euro Liquidity Fund Sterling Reserve Fund U.S. Dollar Liquidity Fund FIXED INCOME Absolute Return Bond Fund Global Bond Fund Global Emerging Markets Bond Fund Global Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund Global Government Bond Index Fund Global High Yield Bond Fund Global Inflation -Linked Bond Fund Global Short Bond Fund Sterling Corporate Bond Fund U.S. Core Bond Fund USD Low Duration Credit Fund For more information about Payden & Rygel's funds, contact us at a location listed below. Payden&Rygel LOS ANGELES 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, California 90071 213 625-1900 BOSTON 265 Franklin Street Boston, Massachusetts 02110 617 807-1990 LONDON 1 Bartholmew Lane London EC2N 2AX United Kingdom + 44 (0) 20-7621-3000 MILAN Corso Matteotti, 1 20121 Milan, Italy 74 ATTACHMENT 19 County of Riverside Treasurer's Fooled Investment Fund March 2011 Contents Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund Economy Market Data Portfolio Data Compliance Report Month End Holdings Hot air balloonsover lake &inner in Temecula, Ssuthwest I3verside County, CA. Digital Image. NBC Sen Diego. http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/temecula-vallev-2014-balloon-wine-testival-north-san-dieco-961142951 html COUNT( OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER TAX C O LLEC TO R 76 1 Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund Quarterly Commentary After the FED completed three 25-basis- point increasesto the FED fundstarget interest rate in 2017, the big question for 2018 is, "How many this year?" The Fed has raised rates twice so far this year, first on January 31st and most recently on March 21st, taking the rate up to 1.75 percent. Many economic forecasts expect at least one more hike to happen this year in either June or August. Why does this matter you may ask? Well, actively managing a fixed income portfolio in a rising interest rate environment can be challenging at best and downright impossible without showing any unrealized losses We have navigated these market conditions in the past, most namely the rise in rates before the great recession between 2002 and 2008, all without losing a penny. Furthermore, we didn't show any loss- esduring the entire financial collapse or Great Recession. The upside to a rising rate environ- ment is more interest eamingsto the pool and its participants when it is needed most to shore up a beleaguered County budget. We are on target to more than double last year's ea ming sa s interest ratescontinue to rise. How does the most recent rise in interest rates (particularly market rates) affect the TPIF? It is important to mention to our readers about the difference between realized vs un- realized gains or losses On the bottom of this report, you will see two columns labeled Treasurer's Statement A Rising Rate Environment "Paper Gain or Loss," expressed in dollars, and as a percentage of the total. In the world of fixed income, there is an inverse relationship that exists in that when interest rates decline, there is gain in the underlying market value of the securities; the reverse is also true with rising rates and a loss in underlying market value. Unrealized losses are expected to con- tinue in a rising rate environment. The difference between having to realize a loss vs, not having to is a function of under- standing the cash flows of the County Treas- ury and having ample liquidity on hand to meet the needs of our depositors Our Capi- tal Markets team utilizes historical cash flow model and makes adjustments throughout the year to revenues and disbursements if they come in higher or lower than expected. Our major cash outflows are pre -funded months and years in advance to negate the need to ever sell a security before maturity, especially under adverse market conditions We have taken the appropriate steps to im- munize our portfolio from this and other eco- nomic hazardsand to be observant of volatile economic conditions Moreover, we will con- tinue to adhere to our investment objectives of safety, liquidity, and retum. The FED remainsdata dependent and their course of action depends on how economic conditions develop in real time. Currently, The Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund is comprised of contributions from the county, schools, special districts, and other discretionary depositorsthroughout the County of Riverside. The primary objective of the treasurer shall be to safeguard the principal of the funds underthe treasurer's control, meet the liquidity needs of the depositor, and to maximize a retum on the fundswithin the given parameters The Treasurer -Tax Collector and the Capital Markets team are committed to maintaining the highest credit ratings. The Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund is currently rated AAA-bf by Moody's Investor Service and AAAf/S1 by Rtch Ratings, two of the nation's most trusted bond credit rating services Since its inception, the Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund has been in full compliance with the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy, which is more restrictive than California Govemment Code 53646. overall economic growth and the labor mar- ket displayed enough positive momentum for the FED to continue its rate hike trajectory, despite the core inflation rate remaining be- low the FED's 2 percent target rate. On their March 21 press release, the FED noted, "...economic activity will expand at a moder- ate pace in the medium term and labor mar- ket conditions will remain strong." The unem- ployment rate remains at 4.1 percent, the labor force participation rate improved, and GDP (Q4 Revised) growth of 2.9 percent was strong. The marketswere turbulent thisquarterwith FED activity, the implementation of trade tariffs on U.S imports of steel and aluminum, the raising global concemsof a possible trade war, the two-day govemment shutdown that started on January 20th, and the suspension of the debt ceiling until March 1, 2019. In Q1 2018, the 2yr Treasury yield increased 35 bps from 1.95 to 2.27, while the 3-month bill in- creased 29 bpsfrom 1.44to 1.73. The portfolio is well positioned to capitalize on the rising rate environment. Jon Christensen Treasurer -Tax Collector Capital MarketsTea m Jon Christensen Treasurer -Tax Collector Giovane Pizano Chief Investment Manager Steve Faeth Sr. Investment Manager Isela Licea Assistant Investment Manager Jake Nieto Intern Month End Market Month End Book Value ($)* Value ($) Paper Gain or Loss ($) Paper Gain or Book Yield Loss (%) (%) WAM (Yrs) 18-Mar 18-Feb 18-Jan 17-Dec 17-Nov 17-Oct 6,690,407,405.09 6,498,908,307.13 6,605,413,937.61 7,694,737,199.78 6,308,195,449.12 6,255,513,634.27 6,723,896,582.30 6,535,413,566.05 6,637,299,033.46 7,714,635,653.16 6,327,879,337.38 6,269,409,129.71 (33,489,177.21) (36,505,258.92) (31,885,095.85) (19,898,453.38) (19,683,888.26) (13,895,495.44) -0.50% -0.56% -0.48% -0.26% -0.31 % -0.22% 1.63 1.53 1.47 1.39 1.32 1.27 1.14 1.17 1.14 1.01 1.20 1.22 *Market valuesdo not include accrued interest. COUNT( OF FJV ERSIDE TREASURER TAX C O LLECTO R 77 2 Economy National Economy Nonfarm payrolls posted the largest gains since July 2016, according to the Employment Stuation news release. • Construction and retail trade industriescontributed greatest to nonfarm payrolls. Information sector payrolls fell by twelve thousand, the largest lossof any industry. • The prime -age labor force participation rate (25- to 54- years-old) isthe highest since September2010. • Average hourly earnings, weekly earnings, and weekly hoursworked all increased last month. [BLS; 03/10/2018] 3.5% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% Real GDP ■Q/Q Change Y/YChange on Quarter 3.1% 3.2% 1.2% r Q1 Q2 Q3 2.9% Labor Force Participation Rate Q4 Whole labor force (left) - Ages25 to 54 (right) 67.0% 83.5% 65.0% � 82.5% 64.0% 82.0% 63.0% v f,,� 81.5% 62.0% 81.0% 61.0% 80.5% 60.0% 80.0% v0 (1,O �O �O �O �O �O �o �O �O v0 �O �O Key Economic Indicators State Economy Key indexes show that California's economy continues to grow at a moderate pace. • California Economic Activity Index has risen for fifth straight month. [Comerica Bank; 03/30/2018] • Y/Y growth for CA housing price index has accelerated for four out of five most recent quarters. [FRED; 03/30/2018] • California and Inland Empire could be disproportionately affected by disruptions in trade via logistics and manufac- turing industries. [Inland Valley Daily Bulletin; 04/02/2018]. Housing Price Index: All Transactions(Y/Y) 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% ■ California 7 United States Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 2016 2016 2016 2016 2017 2017 2017 Inflation Rate (Y/Y) 1 Q4 2017 11111n111111111111 ��� �at P�� �Q� ,J� �J� PJ� S�� 0 \\o� �0c �d� <Ke- Source: Federal Reserve Economic Data and County of Rverside Office of the Treasurer -Tax Collector. Release Date Indicator Actual Consensus Difference 03/ 28/ 2018 03/ 09/ 2018 03/ 09/ 2018 03/ 13/ 2018 03/ 13/ 2018 03/ 05/ 2018 03/21/2018 03/ 06/ 2018 03/ 23/ 2018 Real Gross Domestic Product -Q/Q Change Unemployment Rate -Seasonally Adjusted Non -Farm Payrolls- M/M Change CPI-Y/YChange CPI Ex Food and Energy -Y/YChange Non -Manufacturing Index Existing Home Sales-Y/Y Change Factory Orders- M/M Change Durable GoodsOrders- M/M Change 2.90% 4.10% 313,000 2.20% 1.80% 59.5 3.00% -1.40% 3.10% 2.70% 4.00% 205,000 2.20% 1.90% 58.8 -1.30% 1.70% 0.20% 0.10% 108,000 0.00% -0.10% 0.70 -0.10% 1.40% COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 1REASURER-TAX C O LLEC TO R 78 3 Market Data FOMC Meeting 03/21/2018 • The FOMC stated, "Near -term risks to the economic outlook appear roughly balanced". • the Federal Reserve increased the Fed FundsTarget Rate to 1.50-1.75 from 1.25-1.50%. • Inflation has "increased in recent months, but [remains low]". The FOMC expects inflation "to move up in coming months and stabilize around [2 percent] over the medium term." • the next FOMC meeting isscheduled for May 1, 2018. Fed FundsTarget Rate (Upper Limit) 2.00% 1.75% 1.50% 1.25% 1.00% 0.75% 0.50% \-1`6C 1"-*99 \I`d''\ ON-)J\ 1,0c) Se9 Oct �a l OeG �d� Fep o\or USTreasury Curve 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 02/ 28/ 2018 4 03/ 29/ 2018 --4 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Treasury Curve Differentials 3 Mo 6 Mo 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 5 Yr 10 Yr 30 Yr 03/ 29/ 2018 - 02/ 28/ 2018 03/ 29/ 2018 0.08 0.07 1.73 1.93 0.02 0.02 2.09 2.27 -0.03 -0.09 2.39 2.56 -0.13 -0.16 2.74 2.97 02/ 28/ 2018 1.65 1.86 2.07 2.25 2.42 2.65 2.87 3.13 The USTreasury Curve and itsvaluesare subject to frequent change and will be updated monthly with each issued TPIF report. C O UNlY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER TAX C O LLEC TO R 79 4 Market Data cont'd 69.00 64.00 59.00 - 54.00 49.00 44.00 Commodities Nymex Crude (left) Nymex Nat Gas (right) 1 11 �O ,pV 27, 000.00 26, 000.00 25, 000.00 24, 000.00 23, 000.00 22, 000.00 21, 000.00 20, 000.00 19,000.00 �1 �1 �1 Z� OJ d' O� 5 � � Dow Jones 3.40 3.20 3.00 2.80 2.60 2.40 2.20 2.00 210.00 190.00 170.00 150.00 130.00 110.00 90.00 70.00 Stocks InduAria I Metals(left) Iron Ore (right) 7,5 00.0 0 7,000.00 - 6,500.00 6,000.00 5,500.00 5,000.00 Prec ious M eta Is (left) 1\q) \q) NASDAQ 100 (Left) S&P500 (right) 67V,5091°,� � Q�1 0��1 'J\�1 ��1 °,�1 0� 0 a�0 � 4, s �' 0 95.00 90.00 85.00 80.00 75.00 70.00 65.00 60.00 55.00 50.00 3,000.00 2,800.00 2,600.00 2,400.00 2,200.00 2,000.00 * Valueslisted on this page are in USdollarsand are based on the final business day of the month. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER TAX C O LLEC TO R 5 80 Portfolio Data The County of Riverside's Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund is currently rated Aaa-bf by Moody's Investor Service and AAP&S1 by Fitch Ratings. Moody's Asset Rating (000's) Book MK17Book %Book Yield Aaa Aa1 Aa2 Aa3 NR Totals: 3,892,516.49 99.10% 57.89% 324,748.86 100.14% 4.83% 386,884.87 100.09% 5.75% 1,230,982.06 100.09% 18.31 % 888,764.30 99.95% 13.22% 6,723,896.58 99.50% 100.00% S&P Asset Rating (000's) 1.61 % 1.54% 1.65% 1.72% 1.63% 1.63% Book MKT/ Book % Book Yield AAA AA+ AA AA- NR Totals: 424,577.75 100.06% 6.31 % 1.79% 3,857,214.84 99.10% 57.37% 1.59% 256,921.14 100.27/0 3.82% 1.63% 1,296,418.55 100.06% 19.28% 1.70% 888,764.30 99.95% 13.22% 1.63% 6,723,896.58 99.50% 100.00% 1.63% 12-Month Projected Cash Row Required Monthly Monthly Matured Month Receipts Disbursements Difference Investments Balance Actual Investments Available to Maturing Invest> 1 Year 04/ 2018 04/ 2018 05/ 2018 06/ 2018 07/ 2018 08/ 2018 1,946.22 912.13 1,153.32 1,006.35 1,100.00 1,500.00 1,900.00 1,300.00 846.22 (587.87) (746.68) (293.65) 740.88 635.84 105.04 317.97 293.65 170.36 1,016.58 428.71 1,022.06 1,013.47 447.38 295.75 105.04 290.13 09/ 2018 1,100.00 1,250.00 (150.00) 44.96 10/ 2018 1,051.06 1,100.00 (48.94) 48.94 11/2018 1,125.00 1,100.00 25.00 270.00 254.87 25.00 239.50 12/ 2018 01/2019 02/ 2019 03/ 2019 2,350.00 1,000.00 850.00 1,350.00 1,100.00 2,100.00 1,050.00 1,200.00 1,250.00 (1,100.00) (200.00) 25.00 150.00 1,275.00 175.00 110.66 100.34 150.00 68.31 TOTALS 14,584.96 15,335.84 (750.88) 730.52 3,345.69 4,112.47 5,993.37 10.86% 61.16% 89.14% ' Valueslisted in Cash Row Table are in millionsof USD. Based on historic and current financial conditionswithin the County, the Pool isexpected to maintain sufficient liquidity of fundsto cover County expensesforat least the next twelve months. COUNT( OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER TAX C O LLECTO R 81 6 Portfolio Data cont'd Asset Maturity Distribution (Par Value) 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 15.17% 1,022,060.01 21.60% 1,455,000.72 0-1 Mos 1-3 Mos *Cash valuesare in thousandsof dollars. Asset Allocation 24.28% 1,635,400.00 13.07% 880,519.00 3-12 Mos 1-2 Yr 12.72% 856,760.00 13.15% 886,080.00 2-3 Yr 3-5 Yr Assets Scheduled Book Scheduled Market Mkt/ Sch Book Yield WAL(Yr) Mat (Yr) TREAS AGENCIES MMKT CASH CALTRUST FN D COMM PAPER NCDS MEDIUM TERM NOTES MUNI LOCALAGCY OBUG 293,761.19 3,237,681.62 141, 994.51 535,000.00 54,000.00 1,011,867.70 870,000.00 251,877.09 327, 519.48 195.00 293,397.41 3,201,976.71 141,994.51 535,000.00 54,021.60 1,014,323.15 870,000.00 251,979.55 327,519.48 195.00 99.88% 98.90% 100.00% 100.00% 100.04% 100.24% 100.00% 100.04% 100.00% 100.00% 1.45% 1.57% 1.55% 1.67% 1.60% 1.79% 1.76% 1.87% 1.32% 2.03% 0.561 2.019 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.255 0.262 0.951 0.729 2.211 0.561 2.041 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.255 0.262 0.955 0.729 2.211 Totals: 6,723,896.58 6,690,407.41 99.50% 1.63% 1.141 1.143 * For details on the Pool's composition see Month End Portfolio Holdings, pages 9 to 13. T1MMl Pool Yield TIMMI 2.00% 1.75% 1.50% - 1.25% - 1.00% - 1.63% 1.80% 0.75% �� \1 �� \1 �� \� '\� \$ �� pPs, o� ��� ))� Pig Sep pc\ �a Qec )�, pep 1`6 The Treasurer's Institutional Money Market Index (TIMM!) is a composite index of four AAA rated prime institutional money market funds. Their average yield is compared to the yield of the Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund in the above graph. C O UNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER TAX C O LLECTO R 82 7 Compliance Report Compliance Status: Full Compliance The Treasurer's Pooled Investment Fund was in full compliance with the County of Riverside's Treasurer's State- ment of Investment Policy. The County's Statement of Investment Policy is more restrictive than California Gov- ernment Code 53646. The County's Investment Policy is reviewed annually by the County of Riverside's Over- sight Committee and approved by the Board of aipervisors. Investment Category MUNICIPAL BONDS (MUNI) U.S. TREASURIES LOCAL AGENCY OBUGATIONS(LAO) FEDERAL AG EN C I ES COMMERCIAL PAPER (CP) CERTIFICATE & TIM E DEPOSITS (NCD & TCD) REPURCHASE AG REEVI EN TS ( REPO ) REVERSE REPO S MEDIUM TERM NOTES (WINO) CAMUST SHO RT TERM FUND MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS (MMF) LOCAL AGEVCY INVESTM ENT FUN D (LAIT) CASH/ DEPOSIT ACCOUNT GOVERNMENT CODE Maximum Authorized S&P/ Maturity %Limit Moody's 5 YEARS NO LIMIT NA 5 YEARS NO LIMIT NA 5 YEARS NO LIMIT NA 5 YEARS NO LIMIT AAA 270 DAYS 40% A 1 / P1 5 YEARS 30% NA 1 YEARS NO LIMIT NA 92 DAYS 20% NA COUNTY INVESiMENT POUCY Maximum Authorized % S&P/ Moody's Maturity Limit 4 YEARS 5 YEARS 3 YEARS 5 YEARS 270 DAYS 1 YEAR Actual % 15% AA-/Aa3/AA- 4.87% 100% 2.50% 100% 40% 25% Combined NA INVESTM ENT GRADE NA Al/P1/F1 Al/P1/F1 40% m a x, 25% 45 DAYS in term repo Al/Pi/ F1 over 7days 60 DAYS 5 YEARS 30% A 3 YEARS NA NA NA 60 DAYS(1) 20% AAA/Aaa (2) NA NA NA NA NA NA DAILY UQUIDITY DAILY UQUIDITY DAILY UQUIDITY NA 10% 20% 1.00% 20% Max $50 million NA NA 4.37% 0.00% 48.15% 15.05% 12.94% 0.00% 0.00% AA/Aa2/AA 3.75% NA 0.80% AAA by2Of3 RATINGS 2.11% AGC. NA NA i Money Market Mutual Fundsmaturity may be interpreted asa weighted average maturity not exceeding 60 days 20rmust have an investment advisorwith no fewerthan 5 yearsexperience and with assetsunder management of $500,000,000 USD. 0.00% 7.96% THIS COMPLETES THE REPORT REQUIRBVI ENTS OF CAUFORNIA GOVERNMENTCODE53646. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER -TAX C O LLECTD R 83 8 Month End Portfolio Holding= CUSP Description Maturity Coupon Yield Par Book Market Market Unrealized Modified Years To Date To Mat Value Value Price Value Gain/Loss Duration Maturity Fund:1 POOLFUND 1060: MMKTACCISA/366 FRG XX FIDEMY GOV GOFXX FEDERATED GOV FG 1XX GOLDMAN SACHSGOV 04/01/2018 1.438 04/01/2018 1.417 04/01/2018 1.434 WFFXX WELLSFARGO GOV 04/01/2018 1.416 WFJXX HERITAGEPRIMEMMF 04/01/2018 1.679 RPXX FIDELITYPRIMEMMF 04/01/2018 1.632 1MPX0( BLACKROCKPRMEMMF 04/01/2018 1.625 CJPXX JPMORGANPbMEMMF 04/01/2018 1.622 BLACKROCK PRIMEMMF 04/01/2018 1.225 1.552 1065: CLIR-A/ 366 CDR CAL -RUSTS -II -TERM FUND 04/01/2018 1.438 1.417 1.434 1.416 1.665 1.620 1.621 1.619 1.225 1.547 50,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 4,998,000.80 29,988,005.30 50,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 29,997,501.25 24,990,003.50 24,995,001.50 24,997,003.50 25,002,002.90 0.00 0.00 14111115,013.1011,994,505.65 100.000000 100.000000 100.000000 100.000000 100.040000 100.031666 100.020000 100.020000 .000000 11111.015139 50,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 29,997,501.25 24,995,001.50 25,002,002.90 0.00 141,994,505.65 0.00 .003 .003 0.00 .003 .003 0.00 .003 .003 0.00 .003 .003 0.00 .003 .003 0.00 .003 .003 0.00 .003 .003 0.00 .003 .003 0.00 .000 .003 0.00 .0031.1 .003 1.596 1.596 54,000,000.00 54,000,000.00 100.040000 54,021,600.00 21,600.00 .003 .003 1.596 1.596 54,000,000.00 54,000,000.00 100.040000 54,021,600.00 21,600.00 .003 .003 1080: MGD RA1B-A/366 CA9i BANK OF THE WEST 04/01/2018 1.670 1.670 350,000,000.00 350,000,000.00 100.000000 350,000,000.00 0.00 .003 .003 1.670 1.670 350,000,000.00 350,000,000.00 100.000000 350,000,000.00 0.00 .003 .003 1170: MGD RA1E-A/360 CAS -I UB MANAGED RATE 04/01/2018 1.670 1.670 185,000,000.00 185,000,000.00 100.000000 185,000,000.00 0.00 .003 .003 1.670 1.670 185,000,000.00 185,000,000.00 100.000000 185,000,000.00 0.00 .003 .003 1175: LAO-SINKING FND-A/360 LAO US D ISTC OURTHO USE 06/15/2020 2.031 2.031 195,000.00 195,000.00 100.000000 195,000.00 0.00 .972 2.211 1300: U.S 1REASURY BILL 912796NQ8 U.S 1REASURY 2.031 2.031 195,000.00 08/16/2018 1.508 1.524 111.508 1.524 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 195,000.00 100.000000 195,000.00 49,482,672.22 99.314014 49,482,672.22 99.314014 0.00 .972 2.211 49,657,007.19 174,334.97 .372 378 49,657,007.19 174,334.97 .31111111111111 1310: U.S. TREASURY BONO 912828U40 U.S.1REASURY BOND 11/30/2018 1.000 1.115 25,000,000.00 24,943,359.38 99.328000 24,832,000.00-111,359.38 .660 .668 912828XA3 U.S 1REASURY BOND 05/15/2018 1.000 1.165 25,000,000.00 24,958,984.38 99.920000 24,980,000.00 21,015.62 .122 .123 9128282K5 U.S. 1REASURY BOND 07/31/2019 1.375 1.428 25.000.000.00 24.975.585.94 98.910000 24.727.500.00-248.085.94 1.314 1.334 9128282K5 U.S 1REASURY BOND 07/31/2019 1.375 1.418 25,000,000.00 24,980,468.75 98.910000 24,727,500.00-252,968.75 1.314 1.334 912828XF2 U.S.1REASURY BOND O6/15/2018 1.125 1.256 50,000,000.00 49,953,125.00 99.868000 49,934,000.00-19,125.00 .207 .208 912828568 U.S 1REASURY BOND 07/31/2018 .750 1.515 50,000,000.00 49,757,812.50 99.645000 49,822,500.00 64,687.50 .332 .334 912828WD8 U.S. 1REASURY BOND 10/31/2018 1.250 1.803 25,000,000.00 24,897,460.94 99.574000 24,893,500.00-3,960.94 .575 .586 1828W30 U.S TREASURY BOND r22: 211 1.125 2.04 20000.000.00 19.811718.75 99.117000 19823.400.00 11.681.25 .905 .915 7 1.43 5,000,000.00,W 244,278,515.64 99.485878 243,740,400.00-538,115.64 .589 .596 1425: FHLM C-Fxd-S 30/ 360 3134G7AE1 FHLMC 3YrNc1.5YrE O6/22/2018 1.200 1.230 15,000,000.00 14,986,800.00 99.854000 14,978,100.00-8,700.00 .226 .227 3134G66M0 FHLMC 3YrNc6MOE O6/22/2018 1.250 1.259 25,000,000.00 24,993,750.00 99.865000 24,966,250.00-27,500.00 .226 .227 3134G7217 FHLMC 3YrNc6MoB 10/29/2018 1.050 1.050 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.454000 4,972,700.00-27,300.00 .572 .581 3134G7217 FHLMC 3YrNc6MOB 10/29/2018 1.050 1.050 10.000.000.00 10.000.000.00 99.454000 9.945.400.00-54.600.00 .572 .581 3134G8L64 FHLMC 2.5YrNc1YrE 08/24/2018 1.000 1.000 5.000.000.00 5.000.000.00 99.646000 4.982.300.00-17.700.00 .398 .400 3134G8QE2 FHLMC 3YrNc1YrE 03/29/2019 1.300 1.300 9,000,000.00 9,000,000.00 99.158000 8,924,220.00-75,780.00 .985 .995 3134G8QB8 FHLMC 3YrNc1YrE 03/29/2019 1.270 1.270 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 99.127000 3,965,080.00-34,920.00 .985 .995 3134G81G4 FHLMC 3.5YrNc6MoE 10/11/2019 1.500 1.500 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.845000 14,826,750.00-173,250.00 1.494 1.532 3134G8V97 FHLMC 2.25YrNc6MoB O6/29/2018 1.125 1.125 5,850,000.00 5,850,000.00 99.823000 5,839,645.50-10,354.50 .245 .247 3134G9B55 FHLMC 2YrNc6MoE 07/20/2018 1.000 1.000 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 99.738000 24,934,500.00-65,500.00 .302 .304 3134G9C70 FHLMC 2YrNc6MOE 07/20/2018 .820 .820 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.684000 9,968,400.00-31,600.00 .303 .304 3134G9Q75 FHLMC 3YrNc3MoB 07/26/2019 1.250 1.250 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.735000 9,873,500.00-126,500.00 1.302 1.321 3134G9Q67 FHLMC 2YrNc3MOB 07/27/2018 1.050 1.050 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.754000 9,975,400.00-24,600.00 .321 .323 3134GAB26 FHLMC 3.5YrNc1YrE 02/25/2020 1.250 1.250 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.026000 9,802,600.00-197,400.00 1.870 1.907 3134GAVF8 FHLMC 3.5YrNc1YrE 05/08/2020 1.200 1.200 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 97.666000 14,649,900.00-350,100.00 2.061 2.107 3134GAX22 FHLMC 4YrNc6MoE 11/25/2020 1.370 1.370 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 96.858000 24,214,500.00-785,500.00 2.582 2.658 3134GAYK4 FHLMC 4YrNc1YrE 11/30/2020 1.440 1.440 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.444000 9,744,400.00-255,600.00 2.595 2.671 3134G9XZ5 FHLMC 1Yr 07/20/2018 1.000 1.238 9,400,000.00 9,371,800.00 99.738000 9,375,372.00 3,572.00 .302 .304 3134G9JD0 FHLMC 1YrNc1MOB 05/11/2018 1.000 1.181 25,000,000.00 24,953,500.00 99.913000 24,978,250.00 24,750.00 .112 .112 3130A9C90 FHLMC 1.25Yr 09/28/2018 1.050 1.300 5,000,000.00 4,982,950.00 99.533000 4,976,650.00-6,300.00 .492 .496 3134G9VF1 FHLMC 1YrNc1MOB O6/22/2018 1.060 1.267 10,000,000.00 9,978,000.00 99.823000 9,982,300.00 4,300.00 .226 .227 3134GAK78 FHLMC 1.5YrNc1MoB 01/25/2019 1.350 1.350 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.372000 9,937,200.00-62,800.00 .808 .822 3134GBWH1 FHLMC 2.25YrNc6MoB 09/27/2019 1.500 1.509 6,250,000.00 6,248,750.00 98.658000 6,166,125.00-82,625.00 1.467 1.493 3134G BYSS FHLMC 2YrNc3MoB 07/26/2019 1.600 1.600 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.147000 4,957,350.00-42,650.00 1.297 1.321 3134GBK35 FHLMC 3YrNc3MOB 09/29/2020 1.800 1.800 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.505000 14,775,750.00-224,250.00 2.428 2.501 3137EAEE5 FHLMC 2.75Yr 01/17/2020 1.500 1.602 25,000,000.00 24,942,750.00 98.574000 24,643,500.00-299,250.00 1.758 1.800 3134GBTX0 FHLMC 2.75YrNc2MOB O6/29/2020 1.750 1.780 20,000,000.00 19,983,860.00 98.465000 19,693,000.00-290,860.00 2.182 2.249 3134G BG30 FHLMC 2YrNc5MoB 09/27/2019 1.500 1.620 20,000,000.00 19,953,600.00 98.822000 19,764,400.00-189,200.00 1.466 1.493 3134G BG30 FHLMC 2YrNc6MOB 09/27/2019 1.500 1.621 25,000,000.00 24,942,500.00 98.822000 24,705,500.00-237,000.00 1.466 1.493 3134G92B2 FHLMC 2YrNc8MoE 01/30/2019 .950 1.734 20,000,000.00 19,820,000.00 98.996000 19,799,200.00-20,800.00 .821 .836 3134G9NH6 FHLMC 1.5YrNc5MOE 05/24/2019 1.080 1.809 10,000,000.00 9,895,000.00 98.740000 9,874,000.00-21,000.00 1.129 1.148 3134G9W37 FHLMC 2.5YrNc3MoB 08/10/2020 1.450 2.421 10.000.000.00 9.769.000.00 97.729000 9.772.900.00 3.900.00 2.294 2.364 1.281 1.402 424,500,000.00 423,672,260.00 98.931718 419,965,142.50-3,707,117.50 1.166 ' 1460: FHLMC-STEP%-030/ 360 134G A PS7 FHLM 2YrN 1 M B 1 24 2 1 1.375 1.476 15.000.000.00 14 973 750.00 99.421000 14 913 150.00 -60 600.00 1.548 1. 7 1.375 1.476 _M5,000,000.4E1 14,973,750.00 99.421000 1.14,913,150.00-60,600.0M_ 1.548 1465: FHLM C-STEP%- S30/ 360 3134G7S77 FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB 10/29/2020 1.250 1.250 15.000.000.00 15.000.000.00 98.359000 14.753.850.00-246.150.00 2.520 2.584 3134G8KU2 FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB 02/26/2021 1.250 1.250 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.174000 9,817,400.00-182,600.00 2.839 2.912 3134G8L31 FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB 02/26/2021 1.250 1.250 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.757000 9,875,700.00-124,300.00 2.839 2.912 3134G9JX6 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB O6/09/2021 1.600 1.600 15.000.000.00 15.000.000.00 97.307000 14.596.050.00-403.950.00 3.082 3.195 3134G9JW8 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 05/25/2021 1.500 1.500 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 97.314000 19,462,800.00-537,200.00 3.050 3.153 3134G9NU7 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB O6/16/2021 1.625 1.630 15,000,000.00 14,997,000.00 97.966000 14,694,900.00-302,100.00 3.106 3.214 3134G9UM7 FHLMC 5YrNc3MOB O6/30/2021 1.500 1.500 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 97.275000 14,591,250.00-408,750.00 3.149 3.252 3134G9VA2 FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB O6/30/2021 1.300 1.300 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 97.709000 14,656,350.00-343,650.00 3.162 3.252 3134G9UX3 FHLMC 5YrNc3MOB O6/30/2021 1.500 1.500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.034000 9,703,400.00-296,600.00 3.149 3.252 3134G9UH8 FHLMC 3.5YrNc3MoB 12/30/2019 1.500 1.500 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.637000 14,945,550.00-54,450.00 1.722 1.751 3134G9XA0 FHLMC 5YrNc6MOB 07/13/2021 1.250 1.250 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.565000 14,784,750.00-215,250.00 3.199 3.288 3134G9S40 FHLMC 4YrNc6MoB 07/27/2020 1.150 1.150 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 97.532000 14,629,800.00-370,200.00 2.281 2.326 3134G9R66 FHLMC 5YrNc3MOB 08/10/2021 1.500 1.500 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 96.928000 14,539,200.00-460,800.00 3.269 3.364 3134G9S57 FHLMC4YrNc6MoB 08/10/2020 1.150 1.150 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 97.464000 14,619,600.00-380,400.00 2.317 2.364 3134G9123 FHLMC 5YrNc3MOB 08/10/2021 1.350 1.350 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.308000 9,730,800.00-269,200.00 3.272 3.364 3134G9U47 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 08/25/2021 1.500 1.500 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 97.006000 14,550,900.00-449,100.00 3.298 3.405 3134G95W3 FHLMC 5YrNc3MOB 08/25/2021 1.500 1.500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 96.308000 9,630,800.00-369,200.00 3.298 3.405 3134G96A0 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 08/25/2021 1.375 1.375 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 96.851000 14,527,650.00-472,350.00 3.306 3.405 3134GAEB6 FHLMC 4.25YrNc3MOB 12/08/2020 1.250 1.250 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 97.448000 19,489,600.00-510,400.00 2.624 2.693 3134GAEG5 FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB 08/24/2021 1.250 1.250 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 97.655000 19,531,000.00-469,000.00 3.312 3.403 3134GADP6 FHLMC 5YrNc3MOB 09/13/2021 1.500 1.500 16,500,000.00 16,500,000.00 97.249000 16,046,085.00-453,915.00 3.348 3.458 3134GAET7 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 09/30/2021 1.500 1.500 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 97.156000 19,431,200.00-568,800.00 3.397 3.504 3134GAKY9 FHLMC 5YrNc6MOB 09/30/2021 1.450 1.450 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 97.297000 14,594,550.00-405,450.00 3.401 3.504 3134GANB6 FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB 09/30/2021 1.350 1.350 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 96.936000 14,540,400.00-459,600.00 3.407 3.504 3134GAPM0 FHLMC 5YrNc3MOB 10/25/2021 1.375 1.375 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.013000 9,701,300.00-298,700.00 3.449 3.573 3134GAPM0 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 10/25/2021 1.375 1.375 6,705,000.00 6,705,000.00 97.013000 6,504,721.65-200,278.35 3.449 3.573 3134GAPA6 FHLMC 5YrNc3MOB 10/27/2020 1.250 1.250 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.958000 9,795,800.00-204,200.00 2.510 2.578 3134GAQV9 FHLMC 5YrNc6MoB 10/27/2021 1.400 1.400 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 96.459000 14,468,850.00-531,150.00 3.452 3.578 3134GAQV9 FHLMC 5YrNc6MOB 10/27/2021 1.400 1.400 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 96.459000 14,468,850.00-531,150.00 3.452 3.578 C 0 UN-Y OF RIVERSIDE 1REASURER TAX COLLECTOR 84 9 Month End Portfolio Holdings CUSP Description Maturity Coupon Yield Par Book Market Market Unrealized Modified Years To Date To Mat Value Value Price Value Gain/Loss Duration Maturity 3134GARL0 3134GASF2 3134GASF2 3134GATA2 3134GA1B0 3134GATA2 3134GAUA0 3134GAYF5 3134GAYG3 3134GAYR9 3134GAA87 3134GAA87 3134GAZ49 3134G7S77 3134G BG B2 3134GBHN5 3134GBKC5 3134G BM P4 3134G BPJ5 3134G BSE3 3134G BS)5 3134G BTD4 3134Geir1 3134G BYK2 3134G BW DO 3134GBWS7 FHLMC 5YrNc3MoB 07/27/2022 1 4 BN R-IYYrN M B 7 27 2 22 FHLMC 5YrNc 6MoB FHLMC 5YrNc 3MoB FHLMC 5YrNc 3M oB FHLMC 5YrNc 3MoB FHLMC 5YrNc 3M oB FHLMC 5YrNc 3MoB FHLMC 5YrNc 3M oB FHLMC 5YrNc 3MoB FHLMC 5YrNc 3M oB FHLMC 5YrNc 3MoB FHLMC 5YrNc 3M oB FHLMC 5YrNc 3MoB FHLMC 3YrNc 6MoB FHLMC 3.5Yr FHLMC 3.5YrNc 6MoB FHLMC 3YrNc 3MoB FHLMC 3YrNc 3M oB FHLMC 3YrNc 3MoB FHLMC 3YrNc 6MoB FHLMC 4YrNc6MoB FHLMC 3YrNc 6MoB FHLMC 5YrNc 3MoB FHLMC 5YrNc 6MoB FHLMC 5YrNc 3MoB FHLMC 3.5YrNc 3MoB 10/28/2021 10/27/2021 10/27/2021 10/27/2021 11/10/2021 10/27/2021 11/30/2021 11/26/2021 12/09/2021 12/09/2021 12/30/2021 12/30/2021 02/24/2020 10/29/2020 10/27/2020 04/27/2020 04/27/2020 05/22/2020 05/22/2020 02/24/2021 11/24/2020 06/29/2022 06/22/2022 07/05/2022 01/20/2021 1.250 1.250 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.361000 1.500 1.500 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 96.659000 1.500 1.500 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 96.659000 1.400 1.400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 96.600000 1.550 1.550 17,000,000.00 17,000,000.00 96.778000 1.400 1.400 14,000,000.00 14,000,000.00 96.600000 1.500 1.500 4,500,000.00 4,500,000.00 96.699000 1.550 1.550 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 96.724000 1.500 1.500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.593000 1.650 1.650 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 98.156000 1.900 1.900 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.747000 1.900 1.900 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.747000 1.750 1.750 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 100.013000 1.250 1.327 7,125,000.00 7,108,968.75 98.359000 1.500 1.500 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.664000 1.500 1.500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.143000 1.500 1.500 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 98.230000 1.500 1.500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.839000 1.600 1.600 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 98.779000 1.650 1.650 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.572000 1.600 1.600 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.579000 2.050 2.050 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 98.223000 2.000 2.000 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 97.620000 2.000 2.000 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 98.236000 1.500 1.500 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.716000 2.050 2.050 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 97.928000 2.100 2.100 20.000.000.00 2 .000.000.00 98.37600 1.527 1.528 805,830,000.00 ,810,968.75 97.73642 3.467 3.581 3.444 3.578 3.444 3.578 3.452 3.578 3.475 3.616 3.452 3.578 3.537 3.671 3.519 3.660 3.560 3.696 3.547 3.696 3.587 3.753 3.587 3.753 1.862 1.904 2.519 2.584 2.503 2.578 2.020 2.077 2.020 2.077 2.089 2.145 2.086 2.145 2.813 2.907 2.568 2.655 4.025 4.249 4.011 4.230 19,647,200.00-352,800.00 4.046 4.266 9,871,600.00-128,400.00 2.727 2.811 19,585,600.00-414,400.00 4.102 4.326 19.675.200.00 2 787,589,450.40 -1 9,836,100.00 14,498,850.00 14,498,850.00 9,660,000.00 16,452,260.00 13,524,000.00 4,351,455.00 19,344,800.00 9,759,300.00 19,631,200.00 9,774,700.00 9,774,700.00 20,002,600.00 7,008,078.75 14,949,600.00 9,914,300.00 19,646,000.00 9,883,900.00 19,755,800.00 14,785,800.00 14,786,850.00 19,644,600.00 14,643,000.00 -163,900.00 -501,150.00 -501,150.00 -340,000.00 -547,740.00 -476,000.00 -148,545.00 -655,200.00 -240,700.00 -368,800.00 -225,300.00 -225,300.00 2,600.00 -100,890.00 -50,400.00 -85,700.00 -354,000.00 -116,100.00 -244,200.00 -214,200.00 -213,150.00 -355,400.00 -357,000.00 1525: FNMA-Fxd-S 30/ 360 3136G3RL1 FNMA 3.5YrNc 6M oB 12/16/2019 1.500 1.500 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.691000 4,934,550.00-65,450.00 1.674 1.712 3136G3WC5 FNMA 4YrNc 6M oE 07/13/2020 1.350 1.350 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.740000 9,774,000.00-226,000.00 2.235 2.288 3136G3SY2 FNMA 3.25YrNc6MoB 09/30/2019 1.250 1.250 7,500,000.00 7,500,000.00 98.508000 7,388,100.00-111,900.00 1.481 1.501 3136G3XE0 FNMA 2YrNc6MoE 07/27/2018 .800 .800 15.000.000.00 15.000.000.00 99.657000 14.948.550.00-51.450.00 .322 .323 3135GOM26 FNMA 3YrNc 6MoE 07/26/2019 1.000 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.413000 9,841,300.00-158,700.00 1.305 1.321 3135GOM26 FNMA 3YrNc 6MoE 07/26/2019 1.000 1.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.413000 9,841,300.00-158,700.00 1.305 1.321 3136G3XS9 FNMA 2.5YrNc 6M o E 01/25/2019 .875 .900 7,500,000.00 7,495,350.00 99.034000 7,427,550.00-67,800.00 .811 .822 3136G3A62 FNMA 3YrNc 1YrE 07/26/2019 1.050 1.050 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 98.477000 14,771,550.00-228,450.00 1.305 1.321 3136G3P25 FNMA 3.5YrNc 1YrE 07/26/2019 1.125 1.125 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 98.574000 24,643,500.00-356,500.00 1.304 1.321 3135GOR39 FNMA 3Yr 10/24/2019 1.000 1.091 10,000,000.00 9,973,200.00 98.027000 9,802,700.00-170,500.00 1.541 1.567 3136G4GU1 FNMA 3YrNc 6MoB 11/25/2019 1.400 1.400 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.591000 9,859,100.00-140,900.00 1.618 1.655 3135GOWJ8 FNMA 1Yr 05/21/2018 .875 1.181 10,000,000.00 9,968,300.00 99.884000 9,988,400.00 20,100.00 .139 .140 3135G0160 FNMA 3Yr 07/30/2020 1.500 1.604 10,000,000.00 9,969,700.00 97.995000 9,799,500.00-170,200.00 2.275 2.334 3136GOYK1 FNMA 2Yr 08/28/2019 1.500 1.400 10,000,000.00 10,019,600.00 98.977000 9,897,700.00-121,900.00 1.387 1.411 3135GOS46 FNMA 2.16Y2MoB 01/27/2020 1.650 1.800 5,000,000.00 4,983,850.00 98.594000 4,929,700.00-54,150.00 1.782 1.827 3136G1MG1 FNMA 1.4YrNC5MoB 05/29/2019 1.300 1.833 10,000,000.00 9,922,200.00 98.989000 9,898,900.00-23,300.00 1.141 1.162 3135G0J53 FNMA 1.25Yr 02/26/2019 1.000 1.761 25,000,000.00 24,770,250.00 98.952000 24,738,000.00-32,250.00 .892 .910 3135G0A78 FNMA 2Yr 01/21/2020 1.625 1.911 15,000,000.00 14,910,900.00 98.838000 14,825,700.00-85,200.00 1.765 1.811 3135G0005 FNMA 2.25Yr 03/06/2020 1.750 1.913 11,082,000.00 11,042,326.44 98.701000 10,938,044.82-104,281.62 1.887 1.934 3135GOT78 FNMA 4.83Yr 10/05/2022 2.000 2.322 15,000,000.00 14,782,200.00 97.218000 14,582,700.00-199,500.00 4.244 4.518 3135G 0194 FNMA 5Yr 01/19/2023 2.375 2.495 10.000.000.00 9.944,100.00 98.743000 9.874.300.00-69.800.00 4.488 4.808 1.298 1.465 246,082,000.00 245,281,976.44 98.627752 242,705,144.82-2,576,831.62 1.618 1.670 1560: FNMA-SOB'%-Q 30/360 3136G39G1 FNMA 4.25YrNc6MoB 1565: FNMA-SOBPY0-S30/360 3136G3BX2 FNMA 4YrNc6MoB 03/09/2020 3136G3EH4 FNMA 4YrNc6MoB 03/30/2020 3136G3DV4 FNMA 5YrNc 6MoB 03/30/2021 3136G3PB5 FNMA 5YrNc 6MoB 06/09/2021 3136G3TG0 FNMA 4YrNc6MoB 06/30/2020 3136G3XT7 FNMA 5YrNc 6MoB 07/27/2021 3136G3ZW8 FNMA 5YrNc 6MoB 07/27/2021 13613Y74 FNMA 4YrNc6MoB 242r2r 1725:FHL13-Fxd-S30/360 313383EP2 FHLB 5YrNc 3M oB 3130A7H57 FHLB 2.5YrNc 1YrE 3130A7PV1 FHLB5Yr 3130A7PU3 FHLB 4Yr 3130A8PK3 FHLB 2Yr 09/0• 020 06/20/2018 09/ 28/ 2018 04/05/2021 04/06/2020 08/07/2018 3130A8PK3 FHLB 2Yr 08/07/2018 3130A8PK3 FHLB 2Yr 08/07/2018 3130A8WS9 FHLB 2YrNc1YrE 11/23/2018 3130A8Y72 FHLB 3Yr 08/05/2019 3130A9AE1 FHLB 2Yr 10/01/2018 3130A8XH1 FHLB 1.25YrNc 6M o B 05/10/2018 3130ABB21 FHLB 2.25YrNc 2YrE 07/26/2019 3130ABRS7 FHLB 2Yr 07/12/2019 3130ABYZ3 FHLB 2.75YrNc 9M o E 05/22/2020 3130AC2C7 FHLB 3YrNc 1YrE 08/28/2020 3130ABZE9 FHLB 3YrNc 1YrE 08/28/2020 3130AC3J1 FHLB 2YrNc 3M oB 08/28/2019 3133782M2 FHLB 2Yr 03/08/2019 3130ABQ25 FHLB2.5Yr 03/29/2019 3130AC3D4 FHLB1.5Yr 02/08/2019 3130A9AE1 FHLB1Yr 10/01/2018 3130ABY34 FHLB 2.5Yr 05/29/2020 3130ACBD5 FHLB 2.58YrNc 1M oB 06/29/2020 3133782M2 FHLB 1.25Yr 03/08/2019 3130A8WT6 FHLB8Mo 08/08/2018 313379069 FHLB 4.5Yr 06/10/2022 3130ACJX3 FHLB9Mo 09/28/2018 3130A DFW7 FHLB 3Yr 01/25/2021 3130ABF92 FHLB1.33Yr 05/28/2019 3130A0XD7 FHLB 3Yr 03/12/2021 3130A0XD7 FHLB 3Yr 03/12/2021 3130ADPR7 FHLB 2.5YrNc 3M oB 09/15/2020 313378WG2 FHLB 4.08Yr 03/11/2022 3130ADR53 FHLB 2YrNc 3M oB 03/20/2020 3130AAE46 FHLB10Mo 01/16/2019 1 AD 4 FHLB 2. YrN 1. YrE 1 2 2 21 1760: RILB.SO6'%-Q 30/360 3130A8UH4 FHLB 3YrNcMoB 1.400 1.400 15.000.000.0� 15.000 000.00 � 1.400 1.400 5,000,000.0 15,000,000.00 97.380000 14.607.000.00-393.000.00 2.392 2.447 97.380000 14,607,000.00-393,000.00 2.392 2.447 1.500 1.500 15.000.000.00 15.000.000.00 99.128000 14.869.200.00-130.800.00 1.905 1.942 2.000 2.000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.725000 9,972,500.00-27,500.00 1.962 2.000 1.750 1.750 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 97.283000 14,592,450.00-407,550.00 2.923 3.000 1.550 1.550 15.000.000.00 15.000.000.00 97.483000 14.622.450.00-377.550.00 3.085 3.195 1.150 1.150 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 98.094000 19,618,800.00-381,200.00 2.209 2.252 1.250 1.250 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 96.330000 14,449,500.00-550,500.00 3.237 3.326 1.250 1.250 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 96.558000 19,311,600.00-688,400.00 3.237 3.326 1.125 1.125 15.000.000.00 15.000.000.00 97.125000 14.568.750.00-431.250.00 2.591 2. iii 1.405 1.40L 125,000,000.00 _ 125,000,000.00 97.604200 122,005,250.00-2,994,750.00 2.672 1.250 1.250 3,719,720.08 3,719,720.08 99.878000 3,715,182.02-4,538.06 .220 .222 1.100 1.100 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.557000 4,977,850.00-22,150.00 .493 .496 1.375 1.390 5,000,000.00 4,996,350.00 96.913000 4,845,650.00-150,700.00 2.920 3.016 1.200 1.210 10.000.000.00 9.996.000.00 97.718000 9.771.800.00-224.200.00 1.972 2.019 .625 .726 5,000,000.00 4,989,600.00 99.534000 4,976,700.00-12,900.00 .352 .353 .625 .726 25,000,000.00 24,948,000.00 99.534000 24,883,500.00-64,500.00 .352 .353 .625 .726 10,000,000.00 9,979,200.00 99.534000 9,953,400.00-25,800.00 .352 .353 1.000 1.000 9,500,000.00 9,500,000.00 99.331000 9,436,445.00-63,555.00 .639 .649 .875 .940 15,000,000.00 14,971,200.00 98.203000 14,730,450.00-240,750.00 1.332 1.348 .875 .908 10,000,000.00 9,993,200.00 99.440000 9,944,000.00-49,200.00 .498 .504 1.000 1.154 9,500,000.00 9,483,850.00 99.918000 9,492,210.00 8,360.00 .109 .110 1.375 1.444 10,000,000.00 9,986,000.00 98.797000 9,879,700.00-106,300.00 1.300 1.321 1.460 1.483 10,000,000.00 9,995,400.00 99.064000 9,906,400.00-89,000.00 1.260 1.282 1.600 1.600 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.404000 4,920,200.00-79,800.00 2.093 2.145 2.000 1.790 10,000,000.00 10,061,000.00 99.315000 9,931,500.00-129,500.00 2.339 2.414 1.650 1.650 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.273000 4,913,650.00-86,350.00 2.348 2.414 1.550 1.550 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.138000 4,956,900.00-43,100.00 1.386 1.411 1.500 1.351 10,000,000.00 10,022,300.00 99.404000 9,940,400.00-81,900.00 .926 .937 1.360 1.350 10,000,000.00 10,001,500.00 99.193000 9,919,300.00-82,200.00 .984 .995 1.350 1.400 12,500,000.00 12,491,375.00 99.336000 12,417,000.00-74,375.00 .844 .860 .875 1.446 50,000,000.00 49,730,692.00 99.440000 49,720,000.00-10,692.00 .497 .504 1.613 1.813 10,000,000.00 9,950,500.00 98.401000 9,840,100.00-110,400.00 2.107 2.164 1.650 1.861 5,350,000.00 5,321,270.50 98.407000 5,264,774.50-56,496.00 2.191 2.249 1.500 1.766 15,000,000.00 14,950,500.00 99.404000 14,910,600.00-39,900.00 .924 .937 .950 1.568 15,000,000.00 14,938,650.00 99.647000 14,947,050.00 8,400.00 .353 .356 2.125 2.182 7,975,000.00 7,955,620.75 97.848000 7,803,378.00-152,242.75 3.963 4.197 1.250 1.711 40,000,000.00 39,862,400.00 99.630000 39,852,000.00-10,400.00 .491 .496 2.200 2.212 15,000,000.00 14,994,900.00 99.458000 14,918,700.00-76,200.00 2.706 2.825 1.375 1.972 10,000,000.00 9,921,300.00 99.080000 9,908,000.00-13,300.00 1.137 1.159 2.375 2.484 10,000,000.00 9,968,000.00 99.865000 9,986,500.00 18,500.00 2.825 2.951 2.375 2.489 10,000,000.00 9,966,500.00 99.865000 9,986,500.00 20,000.00 2.825 2.951 2.500 2.500 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.918000 4,995,900.00-4,100.00 2.365 2.463 2.500 2.619 10,000,000.00 9,954,700.00 99.500000 9,950,000.00-4,700.00 3.727 3.948 2.350 2.350 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.860000 9,986,000.00-14,000.00 1.912 1.973 1.250 2.121 23,155,000.00 22,988,052.45 99.326000 22,998,935.30 10,882.85 .780 .797 2.250 2.553 20.000.000.00 19.833.600.00 99.204000 19.840.800.00 7.200.00 2.711 2. 1.391 1.628 441,699,720.08 440,471,380.78 99.257811 438,421,474.82-2,049,905.96 1.285 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 25 000.000.00 25,000,000.00 25 000 000.00 99.674000 25,000,000.00 99.674000 24 918 500.00 24,918,500.00 -81 500.00 1.360 1.375 -81,500.00 1.360 2 1765: R ILB.S113./,-S 30/ 360 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER TAX CO LLECTO R 85 10 Month End Portfolio Holdings CUSP Description Maturity Coupon Yield Par Book Market Market Date To Mat Value Value Price Value Unrealized Modified Yea rs To Gain/Loss Duration Maturity 3130A9DH1 3130A9DA6 3130AA2T4 3130AA2T4 3130AA5A2 3130ABQV1 3130ABV26 3130AB2W9 3130AC6H2 3130AC418 FHLB 5YrNc 3MoB FHLB 5YrNc 3MoB FHLB 5YrNc 6MoB FHLB 5YrNc 6MoB FHLB 5YrNc 1YrB FHLB 5YrNc 6MoB FHLB 5YrNc 6MoB FHLB 5YrNc 3MoB FHLB 5YrNc 3MoB FHLB 5YrNc 3MoB 09/30/2021 09/30/2021 12/09/2021 12/09/2021 12/08/2021 07/26/2022 02/09/2022 08/24/2022 08/24/2022 05/24/2022 1.350 1.350 1.600 1.600 1.700 2.000 1.750 2.000 2.000 1.800 1.717 1.350 1.350 1.600 1.600 1.700 2.000 1.750 2.000 2.000 1.800 1.718 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 15, 000, 000.00 15, 000, 000.00 20 000 000.00 20 000 000.00 145,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 97.580000 97.543000 97.291000 97.291000 98.205000 98.304000 98.480000 97.582000 97.478000 98.473000 97.912759 14,637,000.00 14,631,450.00 9,729,100.00 9,729,100.00 14,730,750.00 14,745,600.00 19,696,000.00 9,758,200.00 14,621,700.00 19 694 600.00 141,W,500.00 -363,000.00 -368,550.00 -270,900.00 -270,900.00 -269,250.00 -254,400.00 -304,000.00 -241,800.00 -378,300.00 -305 400.00 -3,026,500.00 3.407 3.407 3.551 3.551 3.540 4.104 3.704 4.181 4.181 3.973 3.766 3.504 3.504 3.696 3.696 3.693 4.323 3.866 4.403 4.403 4.151 1767: FHLB-Va r-M A/360 3130A9FU0 FHLB 4Yr 09/22/2020 2.004 2.004 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.412000 10,041,200.00 41,200.00 2.450 2.482 3130A9FM8 FHLB 4Yr 09/22/2020 2.004 2.004 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.412000 15,061,800.00 61,800.00 2.450 2.482 3130A9FR7 FHLB 4Yr 09/28/2020 2.027 2.027 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.413000 10,041,300.00 41,300.00 2.467 2.499 3130A9FR7 FHLB 4Yr 09/28/2020 2.027 2.027 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.413000 15,061,950.00 61,950.00 2.467 2.499 2.016 2.016 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.412500 50,206,250.00 206,250.00 2.459 - 1770: FHL6-Var-Q AI 360 1 A N FHLB Yr 7 1 2 2 1.820 1.820 25 000.000.00 25.000 000.00 100.493000 25 123 250.00 123.250.00 2.467 2 1.820 1.820 M25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.493000 _25,123,250.00 123,250.00 2.467 2111 1900: FFC&DISC NOTE 313313L71 R BDISC NOTE 313313E61 FFCBDISC NOTE 10/24/2018 1.620 1.644 20,000,000.00 19,705,700.00 98.890000 19,778,000.00 72,300.00 .558 .567 09/ 05/ 2018 1.600 1.619 25 000 000.00 24 704 444.44 99.168000 24 792 000.00 87 555.56 .426 433 1.609 1.630 45,000,000.00 44,410,144.44 99.044444 44,570,000.00 159,855.56 .485' 1925: FFC6-Fxd-S30/360 3133EFHH3 FFCB 3YrNc 3M oA 10/15/2018 1.110 1.110 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 99.591000 4,979,550.00-20,450.00 .533 .542 3133EFV38 FIB 3YrNc1YrA 03/29/2019 1.250 1.250 10,310,000.00 10,310,000.00 99.125000 10,219,787.50-90,212.50 .985 .995 3133EF5D5 FFCB 4YrNc 1YrA 04/27/2020 1.420 1.420 7,700,000.00 7,700,000.00 97.791000 7,529,907.00-170,093.00 2.023 2.077 3133EGNY7 FIB2.5YrNc3MoA 01/28/2019 1.110 1.110 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 99.288000 24,822,000.00-178,000.00 .818 .830 3133EG S44 FFCB 4YrNc 1YrA 08/24/2020 1.320 1.320 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.478000 9,747,800.00-252,200.00 2.349 2.403 3133EGVK8 R B4YrNc1YrA 09/21/2020 1.350 1.350 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.435000 9,743,500.00-256,500.00 2.423 2.479 3133EGXX8 FFCB 4YrNc 1YrA 10/13/2020 1.340 1.340 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 96.954000 14,543,100.00-456,900.00 2.467 2.540 3133EGC94 R B4YrNc3MoA 11/02/2020 1.380 1.380 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 97.266000 9,726,600.00-273,400.00 2.518 2.595 3133EG R49 FFCB 4YrNc 1YrA 12/07/2020 1.770 1.770 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.232000 9,823,200.00-176,800.00 2.595 2.690 3133ENAJ2 FIB 3YrNc1YrE 02/27/2020 1.710 1.710 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.589000 9,858,900.00-141,100.00 1.864 1.912 3133EHNY5 FFCB1.5Yr 11/21/2018 1.250 1.342 10,000,000.00 9,987,200.00 99.518000 9,951,800.00-35,400.00 .632 .644 3133ENNY5 FIB1.5Yr 11/21/2018 1.250 1.322 10,000,000.00 9,990,000.00 99.518000 9,951,800.00-38,200.00 .632 .644 3133EHRK1 FFCB 2.5Yr 01/17/2020 1.520 1.520 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.649000 9,864,900.00-135,100.00 1.759 1.800 3133ENUL5 FIB3Yr 08/10/2020 1.550 1.550 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 97.986000 4,899,300.00-100,700.00 2.302 2.364 3133EHWN9 FFCB 2Yr 08/28/2019 1.400 1.400 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 98.844000 4,942,200.00-57,800.00 1.388 1.411 3133E1250 FIB 2Yr 06/24/2019 1.520 1.400 5,000,000.00 5,010,640.00 99.207000 4,960,350.00-50,290.00 1.211 1.233 3133EHWN9 FFCB 2Yr 08/28/2019 1.400 1.410 10,000,000.00 9,998,000.00 98.844000 9,884,400.00-113,600.00 1.388 1.411 3133EH2N6 FIB 3Yr 03/20/2020 1.450 1.511 20,000,000.00 19,970,400.00 98.283000 19,656,600.00-313,800.00 1.933 1.973 3133EHJ95 FFCB 3Yr 10/26/2020 1.750 1.760 20,000,000.00 19,994,000.00 98.292000 19,658,400.00-335,600.00 2.483 2.575 3133EHP98 FFCB 2Yr 11/06/2019 1.600 1.667 25,000,000.00 24,967,247.50 98.979000 24,744,750.00-222,497.50 1.561 1.603 3133EH6X6 FFC B4Yr 01/12/2022 2.200 2.365 10,000,000.00 9,938,000.00 98.589000 9,858,900.00-79,100.00 3.588 3.789 1 EM 7 FFCB 3Yr 03/ 01 / 2021 2.500 2.501 10.000.000.00 9.999.700.00 100.028000 10.002.800.00 3.100.00 2.791 2.921 Ali 1.502 1.526 253,010,000.00m 252,865,187.50 98.561537 249,370,544.50-3,494,643.00 1.827 1.881 1930: FFCB-Var-M A/360 3133EDXQ0 FFCB 5Yr 10/10/2019 1.810 1.810 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.168000 15,025,200.00 25,200.00 1.520 1.529 3133EDXQ0 FFCB 5Yr 10/10/2019 1.810 1.810 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.168000 25,042,000.00 42,000.00 1.520 1.529 3133EDXQ0 FIB 5Yr 10/10/2019 1.810 1.825 10,000,000.00 9,997,560.00 100.168000 10,016,800.00 19,240.00 1.520 1.529 3133EFE52 FFCB 3Yr 02/25/2019 2.142 2.142 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.258000 15,038,700.00 38,700.00 .896 .907 3133EFE52 FIB3Yr 02/25/2019 2.142 2.142 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 100.258000 5,012,900.00 12,900.00 .896 .907 3133EFM61 FFCB2.5Yr 09/17/2018 2.028 2.028 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 100.160000 5,008,000.00 8,000.00 .460 .466 3133EFP84 R B 3 Yr 04/04/2019 1.886 1.886 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.231000 25,057,750.00 57,750.00 1.003 1.011 3133EFT56 FFCB 4Yr 04/01/2020 1.899 1.899 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.486000 25,121,500.00 121,500.00 2.066 2.005 3133EF229 FIB4Yr 04/13/2020 1.995 1.995 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.509000 50,254,500.00 254,500.00 2.015 2.038 3133EGCE3 FFCB 5Yr 05/25/2021 2.142 2.142 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.682000 10,068,200.00 68,200.00 3.109 3.153 3133EGCE3 R B5Yr 05/25/2021 2.142 2.142 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.682000 10,068,200.00 68,200.00 3.109 3.153 3133EGLV5 FFCB 3Yr 07/15/2019 1.967 1.967 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 100.312000 5,015,600.00 15,600.00 1.281 1.290 3133EGYA7 FIB 3Yr 10/11/2019 1.920 1.920 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.328000 15,049,200.00 49,200.00 1.517 1.532 3133EG Mg FFCB 3Yr 10/24/2019 2.052 2.052 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.282000 15,042,300.00 42,300.00 1.553 1.567 3133EG F67 FIB 3Yr 11/14/2019 1.935 1.935 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.328000 15,049,200.00 49,200.00 1.607 1.625 3133EG F67 FFCB 3Yr 11/14/2019 1.935 1.935 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 100.328000 15,049,200.00 49,200.00 1.607 1.625 3133EG4C6 FIB3.9Yr 01/18/2022 2.048 1.798 15,000,000.00 15,139,095.00 100.518000 15,077,700.00-61,395.00 3.662 3.805 3133EJDG1 FFCB 5Yr 02/21/2023 1.911 1.911 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.860000 14,979,000.00-21,000.00 4.683 4.899 3133EJFS3 FIB3Yr 03/12/2021 1.750 1.750 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.927000 14,989,050.00-10,950.00 2.865 2.951 1.947 1.935 305,000,000.00M 305,136,655.00 100.316393 305,965,000.00 828,345.00 1.984 1950: FMAC-Fxd-S 30/360 3132XORB9 FAM CA 1 Yr 05/15/2018 1.250 1.250 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 99.979000 24,994,750.00-5,250.00 .122 .123 3132X0RW3 FAM CA 1Yr 05/10/2018 1.150 1.150 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 99.957000 24,989,250.00-10,750.00 .109 .110 3132X0S38 FAM CA 1YrNc6MoE 04/19/2018 1.250 1.250 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 99.984000 24,996,000.00-4,000.00 .052 .052 3132X0S38 FAM CA 1YrNc6MoE 04/19/2018 1.250 1.250 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 99.984000 24,996,000.00-4,000.00 .052 .052 3132X0S38 FAM CA 1YrNc6MoE 04/19/2018 1.250 1.250 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.984000 14,997,600.00-2,400.00 .052 .052 3132XOSU6 FAM CA 2Yr 08/15/2018 1.250 1.320 5,000,000.00 4,996,000.00 99.817000 4,990,850.00-5,150.00 .373 .375 3132XOUT6 FAM CA 1.25Yr 09/14/2018 1.320 1.320 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.754000 14,963,100.00-36,900.00 .454 .458 3132X0WK3 FAM CA 2Yr 08/20/2019 1.440 1.442 5,000,000.00 4,999,800.00 98.899000 4,944,950.00-54,850.00 1.366 1.389 3132XOWY3 FAM CA 2Yr 09/26/2019 1.420 1.420 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 98.754000 9,875,400.00-124,600.00 1.465 1.490 3132X0A50 FAM CA 1.4Yr 05/15/2019 1.810 1.810 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 99.590000 9,959,000.00-41,000.00 1.099 1.123 3132X0C41 FAM CA 1.5Yr 06/24/2019 1.860 1.860 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 99.576000 19,915,200.00-84,800.00 1.206 1.233 3132X0074 FAM CA 2.08Yr 02/03/2020 1.970 1.970 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 99.301000 14,895,150.00-104,850.00 1.792 1.847 3132X0F97 FAMCA 1Yr 01/29/2019 1.900 1.900 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 99.814000 24,953,500.00-46,500.00 .815 .833 1965: FMAC-Var-M AI 360 3132X0QY0 FAM CA 1 Yr 3132X0A18 FAM CA 2.5 Yr 1.459 1.460 220,000,000.00 219,995,800.00 99.759432 219,470,750.00-525,050.00 .551 04/03/2018 1.616 1.616 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 25,063,500.00 06/02/2020 1.810 1.695 25,000,000.00 100.001000 100.332000 50,000,500.00 25,083,000.00 500.00 .008 .008 19,500.00 2.133 2.175 •,063,500.00 100.111333 1975: FMAC-Va r-Q A/ 360 3132X0ED9 FAM CA 3Yr 3132X0EV9 FAM CA 3Yr 03/19/2019 2.248 2.248 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.267000 07/ 26/ 2019 1.892 1.892 15, 000, 000.00 15, 000, 000.00 100.414000 10,026,700.00 15,062,100.00 26,700.00 .959 .967 62,100.00 1.306 1.321 2.034 2.034 25,000,000.00W 25,000,000.00 100.355200 2350: MUNIS-S 301360 20772JL34 CONNECIICUTSfATE 08/01/2018 2.250 1.398 25,000,000.00 25,613,250.00 882723A33 TEXAS STATE 10/01/2019 1.497 1.497 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 677522HW7 OHIO STATE 05/01/2018 1.250 .940 9,535,000.00 9,597,549.60 419792JG2 HAWAII STATE 04/01/2019 1.380 1.380 4,990,000.00 4,990,000.00 419792JH0 HAWAII STATE 04/01/2020 1.660 1.660 5,055,000.00 5,055,000.00 419792JF4 HAWAII STATE 04/01/2018 1.250 1.160 4,925,000.00 4,933,569.50 76222RUK6 RHO DE !SAND STATE 05/01/2018 1.250 1.010 2,595,000.00 2,607,144.60 76222RUM2 RHO DEISANDSTATE 05/01/2020 1.625 1.520 2,660,000.00 2,670,719.80 102.453000 100.000000 100.656000 100.000000 100.000000 100.174000 100.468000 100.403000 25,088,800.00 25,613,250.00 5,000,000.00 9,597,549.60 4,990,000.00 5,055,000.00 4,933,569.50 2,607,144.60 2,670,719.80 88,800.0 0.00 .334 .337 0.00 1.470 1.504 0.00 .084 .085 0.00 .986 1.003 0.00 1.946 2.005 0.00 .003 .003 0.00 .084 .085 0.00 2.028 2.088 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 1REA W RER TAX COLLECTOR 86 11 Month End Portfolio Holdings CUSP Description Maturity Coupon Yield Par Book Market Market Unrealized Modified Years To Date To Mat Value Value Price Value Gain/Loss Duration Maturity 76222RUL4 RHODE ISLAND STATE 05/01/2019 13063CP79 CALIFORNIA STATE 04/01/2018 3733845L6 GEO RGIA STATE 07/01/2020 3733845J1 GEORGIASTAIE 07/01/2018 3733845K8 G EO RG IA STATE 07/01/2019 0410422M ARKANSASSTATE 06/01/2018 041042ZI2 ARKANSASSTATE 06/01/2019 419792ND4 HAWAII STATE 10/01/2018 419792NE2 HAWAII STATE 10/01/2019 419792NF9 HAWAII STATE 10/01/2020 13063C4V9 CALIFORNIA STATE 11/01/2018 68609BXK8 OREGON STATE 05/01/2019 68609BYC5 OREGON STATE 04/01/2019 68609BYB7 OREGON STATE 04/01/2018 68609BXJ1 OREGON STATE 05/01/2018 13063DAA6 CALIFORNIA STATE 04/01/2018 93974DV21 WASHINGTON STATE 08/01/2018 93974DV39 WASHINGTON STATE 08/01/2019 801546PC0 SANTA CLARA COUNT'G.O. 08/01/2018 13063DAC2 STATE OFCAUFORNIA 04/01/2021 110878A L0 ALAM EDACOUNIY G.O. OS/01/2020 1.375 .900 3.000 3.000 3.000 2.250 2.000 1.000 1.151 1.370 1.050 1.450 1.440 1.020 1.030 1.248 1.350 1.500 1.650 2.625 2.562 1.621 1.220 1.127 1.370 .930 1.110 .840 1.024 .911 1.101 1.319 .950 1.450 1.441 1.021 1.030 1.248 1.350 1.541 1.650 2.011 2.562 1.317 2,625,000.00 41,290,000.00 6,825,000.00 6,345,000.00 6,580,000.00 12,810,000.00 13,470,000.00 4,870,000.00 2,250,000.00 2,250,000.00 50,000,000.00 1,830,000.00 1,750,000.00 1,735,000.00 1,560,000.00 33,000,000.00 1,620,000.00 8,745,000.00 33,510,000.00 14.400.000.00 17.600.000.00 =4,825,000.00 2,636,838.75 41,120,711.00 7,254,770.25 6,602,480.10 6,943,874.00 13,139,473.20 13,837,192.20 4,878,473.80 2,253,262.50 2,254,320.00 50,098,500.00 1,829,981.70 1,749,982.50 1,734,982.65 1,559,984.40 33,000,000.00 1,620,000.00 8,738,703.60 33,510,000.00 14.688.720.00 17.600.000.00 327,519,484.15 100.451000 99.590000 106.297000 104.058000 105.530000 102.572000 102.726000 100.174000 100.145000 100.192000 100.197000 99.999000 99.999000 99.999000 99.999000 100.000000 100.000000 99.928000 100.000000 102.005000 100.000000 100.829519 2,636,838.75 41,120,711.00 7,254,770.25 6,602,480.10 6,943,874.00 13,139,473.20 13,837,192.20 4,878,473.80 2,253,262.50 2,254,320.00 50,098,500.00 1,829,981.70 1,749,982.50 1,734,982.65 1,559,984.40 33,000,000.00 1,620,000.00 8,738,703.60 33,510,000.00 14.688.720.00 17.600.000.00 327,519,484.15 i 3020: COMMERCIALPAPES 64105HDR0 NESTLE 04/25/2018 25215C3M1 DDOA(GUARANTEE) 05/07/2018 03785EE91 APPLE 05/09/2018 25214PBD4 DDOA(GUARANTEE) 06/11/2018 25214PBZ5 DEJO4(GUARANTEE1 07/10/2018 63763QEV5 NAIL SEC CLEARING CORP 05/29/2018 59515NEN9 MICROSOFTCORP 05/22/2018 89233HEV2 TOYOTA MOTORCO RP 05/29/2018 89233HG24 TOYOTA MOTORCORP 07/02/2018 03785EEN0 APPLE 05/22/2018 64105HGJ5 NESTLE 07/18/2018 89233HJR6 TOYOTA MOTORCORP 09/25/2018 25214PDV2 DEJOA(GUARANTEE) 05/14/2018 63763QFS1 NAIL SEC CLEARING CORP 06/26/2018 64105HHN5 NEEILE 08/22/2018 89233HEE0 TOYOTA MOTORCORP 05/14/2018 63763QF69 NAIL SEC CLEARING CORP 06/06/2018 89233HEF7 TOYOTA MOTORCORP 05/15/2018 63763QF69 NAIL SEC CLEARING CORP 06/06/2018 89233HHQ0 TOYOTA MOTORCORP 08/24/2018 25214PEL3 DEJOA(GUARANTEEI 10/10/2018 89233HF41 TOYOTA MOTORCORP 06/04/2018 93114FEM2 WAL-MARTSfORESINC 05/21/2018 25214PEY5 DEXIA (GUARANTEE) 11/28/2018 63763QFJ1 NAIL SEC CLEARING CORP 06/18/2018 03785EKQ6 APPLE 10/24/2018 16677KL76 CHEVRON 11/07/2018 25214PF81 DMA (GUARANTEE) 05/14/2018 03785EBJ0 APPLE 05/22/2018 r22N3= BOOB N M O BIL 1.220 1.400 1.350 1.500 1.520 1.400 1.450 1.550 1.660 1.480 1.660 1.900 1.690 1.700 1.690 1.750 1.650 1.800 1.730 2.150 2.140 2.050 1.910 2.320 2.100 2.110 2.290 1.800 1.860 r 14 211: 1.: 6 1.230 1.413 1.362 1.517 1.537 1.411 1.462 1.563 1.676 1.490 1.675 1.925 1.699 1.712 1.706 1.759 1.659 1.808 1.738 2.173 2.168 2.061 1.918 2.358 2.111 2.137 2.324 1.804 1.865 15,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 40,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 45,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 45,000,000.00 45,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 75 000 000.0 r 14,879,525.00 29,718,833.33 34,695,500.00 34,617,916.67 24,719,222.22 49,593,611.11 49,605,277.78 24,787,951.39 24,761,375.00 29,800,200.00 49,550,416.67 39,487,000.00 9,949,300.00 24,825,277.78 34,663,173.61 9,948,958.33 24,863,645.83 44,797,500.00 24,882,263.89 24,737,222.22 29,611,233.33 19,897,500.00 49,801,041.67 29,510,866.67 49,737,500.00 44,430,300.00 44,341,625.00 34,916,000.00 29,914,750.00 99.871333 99.807000 99.796278 99.601611 99.400000 99.689056 99.726583 99.689056 99.448000 99.726583 99.352000 98.903583 99.769472 99.517444 99.114194 99.769472 99.629667 99.764111 99.629667 99.101806 98.746667 99.640889 99.731944 98.313000 99.562333 98.655278 98.563889 99.769472 99.726583 14,980,700.00 29,942,100.00 34,928,697.22 34,860,563.89 24,850,000.00 49,844,527.78 49,863,291.67 24,922,263.89 24,862,000.00 29,917,975.00 49,676,000.00 39,561,433.33 9,976,947.22 24,879,361.11 34,689,968.06 9,976,947.22 24,907,416.67 44,893,850.00 24,907,416.67 24,775,451.39 29,624,000.00 19,928,177.78 49,865,972.22 29,493,900.00 49,781,166.67 44,394,875.00 44,353,750.00 34,919,315.28 29,917,975.00 74 822 708.33 99.769472 74 827 104.17 1,020,000,000.0, 1,011,867,695.83 99.443446 1,014,323,147.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .334 .337 0.00 2.843 3.005 0.00 2.242 2. 4 0.00 .71 101,175.00 223,266.67 233,197.22 242,647.22 130,777.78 250,916.67 258,013.89 134,312.50 100,625.00 117,775.00 125,583.33 74,433.33 27,647.22 54,083.33 26,794.45 27,988.89 43,770.84 96,350.00 25,152.78 38,229.17 12,766.67 30,677.78 64,930.55 -16,966.67 43,666.67 -35,425.00 12,125.00 3,315.28 3,225.00 1.067 .003 2.164 .251 1.221 .169 1.146 .498 1.478 2.436 .578 1.065 .985 .003 .084 .003 .334 1.315 .068 .100 .105 .194 .272 .159 .140 .159 .250 .140 .294 .478 .118 .234 .388 .118 .180 .121 .180 .391 .517 .174 .137 .647 .212 .555 .591 .118 .140 1.085 .003 2.255 .252 1.252 .170 1.170 .504 1.504 2.507 .589 1.085 1.003 .003 .085 .003 .337 1.337 .068 .101 .107 .197 .277 .162 .142 .162 .255 .142 .299 .488 .121 .238 .395 .121 .184 .123 .184 .400 .529 .178 .140 .663 .216 .567 .605 .121 .142 3130: CO RP-Fxd-S 30/ 360 037833AJ9 APPLE 931142DF7 WAL-MARL 037833AJ9 APPLE 931142DF7 WAL-MARL 05/03/2018 1.000 1.280 20,000,000.00 04/11/2018 1.125 1.255 21,875,000.00 05/03/2018 1.000 1.261 6, 000, 000.00 04/11/2018 1.125 1.264 6,000,000.00 037833AJ9 APPLE 05/03/2018 1.000 1.290 10,000,000.00 037833AJ9 APPLE 05/03/2018 1.000 1.396 5,000,000.00 931142DF7 WAL-MAR1 04/11/2018 1.125 1.306 2,262,000.00 037833AJ9 APPLE 05/03/2018 1.000 1.356 27,920,000.00 037833AJ9 APPLE 05/03/2018 1.000 1.510 5,113,000.00 037833AJ9 APPLE 05/03/2018 1.000 1.531 5,038,000.00 037833AJ9 APPLE 05/03/2018 1.000 1.530 5,000,000.00 037833AJ9 APPLE 05/03/2018 1.000 1.531 10,000,000.00 037833AJ9 APPLE 05/03/2018 1.000 1.531 6.210.000.00 594918BV5 MICROSDFTCORP 02/06/2020 1.850 2.273 6,350,000.00 594918BV5 MICROSOFTCORP 02/06/2020 1.850 2.277 6,000,000.00 594918BG8 MICROSDFTCORP 11/03/2020 2.000 2.543 25,000,000.00 594918BV5 MICROSOFTCORP 02/06/2020 1.850 2.354 3,000,000.00 037833CE8 APPLE 02/08/2019 1.550 2.281 22,840,000.00 594918BV5 MICROSOFTCORP 02/06/2020 1.850 2.373 4,097,000.00 594918BV5 MICROSDFTCORP 02/06/2020 1.850 2.388 8,000,000.00 594918BN3 MICROSOFTCORP 08/08/2019 1.100 2.288 10,000,000.00 594918BV5 MICROSDFTCORP 02/06/2020 1.850 2.414 16,000,000.00 478160BS2 JO HNSON & JO HNSO N 03/01/2021 1.650 2.646 12,000,000.00 4i9.4918BV5 MICROSOFTCORP 02/06/2020 1.850 2.469 10.000.000.00 1 377 1 RRR �a7nti_nnn.00 19,940,200.00 21,846,781.25 5,983,560.00 5,991,780.00 9,970,000.00 4,983,750.00 2,258,878.44 27,858,296.80 5,100,984.45 5,026,966.78 4,989,150.00 9,979,400.00 6.197.207.40 6,297,739.50 5,951,100.00 24,649,750.00 2,971,440.00 22,684,688.00 4,057,013.28 7,920,160.00 9,835,600.00 15,832,480.00 11,663,160.00 9.887.000.00 251 R77 nas 90 99.900000 99.973000 99.900000 99.973000 99.900000 99.900000 99.973000 99.900000 99.900000 99.900000 99.900000 99.900000 99.900000 99.003000 99.003000 98.336000 99.003000 99.226000 99.003000 99.003000 98.331000 99.003000 97.296000 99.003000 99.319901 19,980,000.00 21,869,093.75 5,994,000.00 5,998,380.00 9,990,000.00 4,995,000.00 2,261,389.26 27,892,080.00 5,107,887.00 5,032,962.00 4,995,000.00 9,990,000.00 6.203.790.00 6,286,690.50 5,940,180.00 24,584,000.00 2,970,090.00 22,663,218.40 4,056,152.91 7,920,240.00 9,833,100.00 15,840,480.00 11,675,520.00 9.900.300.00 251 979 551-R2 39,800.00 .090 .090 22,312.50 .030 .030 10,440.00 .090 .090 6,600.00 .030 .030 20,000.00 .090 .090 11,250.00 .090 .090 2,510.82 .030 .030 33,783.20 .090 .090 6,902.55 .090 .090 5,995.22 .090 .090 5,850.00 .090 .090 10,600.00 .090 .090 6.582.60 .090 .090 -11,049.00 1.799 1.855 -10,920.00 1.799 1.855 -65,750.00 2.483 2.597 -1,350.00 1.799 1.855 -21,469.60 .839 .860 -860.37 1.798 1.855 80.00 1.798 1.855 -2,500.00 1.329 1.356 8,000.00 1.798 1.855 12,360.00 2.818 2.921 1,.92 1.798 102467467.92 ,�]� 4500: NCD-Mat A/ 360 89113XFV1 TORONTO DOMINION 05/29/2018 1.450 1.450 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00 .159 .162 05252WMNO AUSRAUANZBKGRF 05/18/2018 1.370 1.370 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 100.000000 35,000,000.00 0.00 .130 .132 05252WMM2 AUSTRALIA NZBKGRF 04/05/2018 1.350 1.350 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00 .014 .014 65590AMW3 NO RDEA BK 05/07/2018 1.480 1.480 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00 .100 .101 65590AMZ6 NO RDEA BK 07/18/2018 1.520 1.520 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00 .294 .299 632531M21 NATIONALAUSIRAUAN BANH 08/02/2018 1.610 1.610 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 100.000000 35,000,000.00 0.00 .334 .340 87019U7B9 SNEOBANK AE 06/04/2018 1.600 1.600 40,000,000.00 40,000,000.00 100.000000 40,000,000.00 0.00 .175 .178 87019U7D5 SNEOBANK AE 06/05/2018 1.620 1.620 40,000,000.00 40,000,000.00 100.000000 40,000,000.00 0.00 .178 .181 89113XQR8 TORONTO DOMINION 07/05/2018 1.700 1.700 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00 .258 .263 65590APV2 NO RDEA BK 07/10/2018 1.700 1.700 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 100.000000 20,000,000.00 0.00 .272 .277 87019U7M 5 SNEOBANK AE 06/20/2018 1.620 1.620 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00 .218 .222 65590AQE9 NO RDEA BK 09/11/2018 1.740 1.740 20,000,000.00 20,000,000.00 100.000000 20,000,000.00 0.00 .441 .449 89113XSU9 TORONTO DOMINION 09/18/2018 1.900 1.900 30.000.000.00 30.000.000.00 100.000000 30.000.000.00 0.00 .459 .468 65590ARU2 NO RDEA BK 05/23/2018 1.740 1.740 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 100.000000 10,000,000.00 0.00 .143 .145 89113XVP6 TORONTO DOMINION 05/01/2018 1.720 1.720 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00 .083 .085 87019VCQ8 SNEOBANKAE 05/01/2018 1.700 1.700 45.000.000.00 45.000.000.00 100.000000 45.000.000.00 0.00 .083 .085 96121T6K9 WESIPAC 11/02/2018 2.080 2.080 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 100.000000 35,000,000.00 0.00 .579 .592 65590ASC1 NO RDEA BK 05/07/2018 1.720 1.720 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00 .100 .101 65590ASQ NO RDEA BK 08/23/2018 2.000 2.000 20.000.000.00 20.000.000.00 100.000000 20.000.000.00 0.00 .389 .397 05252WNG4 AUSRAUANZBKGRF 09/12/2018 1.950 1.950 35.000.000.00 35.000.000.00 100.000000 35.000.000.00 0.00 .443 .452 89113XXW9 TORONTO DOMINION 05/14/2018 1.910 1.910 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 100.000000 30,000,000.00 0.00 .118 .121 05252WNN9 AUSIRAUANZBKGRF 10/31/2018 2.100 2.100 20.000.000.00 20.000.000.00 100.000000 20.000.000.00 0.00 .574 .586 87019VDY0 SNEEBANKAE 05/14/2018 1.920 1.920 35,000,000.00 35,000,000.00 100.000000 35,000,000.00 0.00 .118 .121 632531N95 NATIONALAUSIRAUAN BANH 09/04/2018 2.130 2.130 50,000,000.00 50,000,000.00 100.000000 50,000,000.00 0.00 .421 .430 65590A1X4 NO RDEA BK 06/ 20/ 2018 2.150 2.150 40 000 000.00 40 000 000.00 100.000000 40 000 000.00 0.00 .217 222 1.742 1.742 815,000,000.00M 815,000,000.00 100.000000 815,000,000.00 0.00 .23� COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TREASURER TAX COLLECTOR 87 12 Month End Portfolio Holdings CUSP Description Maturity Coupon Yield Par Book Market Market Unrealized Modified Years To Date To Mat Value Value Price Value Gain/Loss Duration Maturity 4540: NCD-A A/ 360 05252WNRD AUSTRALIA NZ BK GRF 4541: NCD-VAR-M A/360 96121T6P8 WESIPAC BANK NY 10/10/2018 2.130 2.130 2.130 2.130 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 100.000000 100.000000 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 0.00 .517 .529 0.00 .517 .529 11/06/2018 1.891 1.891 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25.000.000.00 0.00 .593 .603 1.891 1.891 25,000,000.00 25,000,000.00 100.000000 25,000,000.00 0.00 .593 .603 Total Fund 1.583 1.632 6,735,819,733.18 6,723,896,582.30 99.325808 6,690,407,405.09-33,489,177.21 1.111 1.143 Grand Total 1.583 1.632 6,735,819,733.18 6,723,896,582.30 99.325808 6,690,407,405.09-33,489,177.21 1.111 1.143 CO UNTY OF RV ERSIDE TREASURER TAX COLLECTOR 88 13 The Mission Inn, Downtown Fbierside. Digital Image. The Mission Inn. http://www.missioninn.com/about-en.html. COUNlY OF RIVERSDE1REASURER-TAX COLLECT° R 89 C O UNITY O F RIV ERSI D E TREASURER -TAX C O LLEC TO R CAPITAL MARKEIS COUNTY ADM I N ISTRA TIV E C EN TER 4080 LEMON STREET, 4TH FLOOR, RIVERSIDE, CA 92502-2205 WWW . C 0 UN 1YTREA SURER. O RG AGENDA ITEM 8D RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michele Cisneros, Deputy Director of Finance THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Financial Statements STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2018. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: During the last nine months of the fiscal year, staff monitored the revenues and expenditures of the Commission. The attached financial statements present the revenues and expenditures for the nine months of the fiscal year. Period closing accrual adjustments are not included for revenues earned but not billed and expenditures incurred for goods and services received but not yet invoiced, as such adjustments are normally made during the year-end closing process. The operating statement shows the sales tax revenues for the third quarter at 57 percent of the budget. This is a result of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 33, Accounting and Financial Reporting for nonexchange Transactions. GASB Statement No. 33 requires sales tax revenues to be accrued for the period in which it is collected at the point of destination or sale, as applicable. The California Department of Tax and Fee Administration collects the Measure A funds and remits these funds to the Commission after the reporting period for the businesses. This creates a two -month lag in the receipt of revenues by the Commission. Accordingly, these financial statements reflect the revenues related to collections for January 2018. On a cash basis, the Measure A and Local Transportation Fund sales tax revenues are 4.97 and 6.20 percent higher, respectively than the same period last year. State Transit Assistance fund receipts for the third quarter have not yet been submitted by the State Controller's Office. Staff will continue to monitor the trends in the sales tax receipts and report to the Commission any necessary adjustments. Federal, state, and local reimbursements are on a reimbursement basis. The Commission will receive these revenues as eligible project costs are incurred and invoiced to the respective agencies. Reimbursement invoices for expenditures through the third quarter will be prepared and submitted in the fourth quarter. Agenda Item 8D 91 During the Fiscal Year 2017/18 budget process and as per the mid -year budget revision, the Commission took a conservative approach to estimate the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) revenues of $21 million passed through from the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). The Commission received TUMF receipts through January 2018. The budgeted balance of $1,250,000 relates to TUMF zone reimbursements from WRCOG for the Interstate 15/Railroad Canyon Interchange project in the city of Lake Elsinore. Toll revenues budgeted at $14 million represent projected toll transactions for the RCTC 91 Express Lanes based on the Riverside County 91 Express Lanes Extension Investment Grade Traffic and Revenue Report and 2013 financing assumptions. The operating statement shows toll revenues at 217 percent of the budget. Toll violations and fee revenues earned represent 210 percent of the budget. Other revenues include proceeds from the return of leased vehicles and sale of excess land acquired in connection with the State Route 91 Project, carpool violation fines, and property management revenues generated from various Commission -owned properties. The Commission took a conservative approach in estimating investment income for FY 2017/18 due to prior years' flat interest yields on investment balances. Investment income is higher in the third quarter primarily because of the investment of sales of tax revenues bond proceeds and increasing investment yields. The expenditures/expenses and other financing sources/uses categories are in line overall with the expectations of the budget with the following exceptions. • Processional services are under budget primarily due to unused budget authority for highway and rail general legal services, public outreach activities, and rail operations and development activities; • Support costs are under budget primarily due to unused budget authority for rail utilities and maintenance costs and toll operations and maintenance costs; • Program operations are under budget due to unused budget authority for the 91 Project and 1-15 Express Lanes project activities; toll operations, motorist and commuter assistance program operations; and highway and rail program management; • Capital project expenditures are generally affected by lags in invoices submitted by contractors and consultants, as well as other issues encountered during certain phases of the projects. The status of significant capital projects with budget exceeding $5 million is discussed in the attachment; • Operating and capital disbursements are made as claims are submitted to the Commission by transit operators; • Special studies unused budget authority relates to feasibilities studies; • Local streets and roads are related to the timing of Measure A sales tax revenues as previously explained. These financial statements reflect expenditures made to the local jurisdictions related to collections through January 2018; Agenda Item 8D 92 " Regional arterial expenditures primarily represent expenditures for the highways and regional arterial program administered by the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). CVAG requests reimbursements from the Commission based on available funds and sufficient budget authority; " Debt service principal payments are made annually on June 1. In July 2017, the Commission retired $30 million of outstanding commercial paper notes in connection with the issuance of the 2017 Series A Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (2017A Bonds) for the I- 15 Express Lanes project and 91 Project completion; " Debt service interest payments are made semiannually on December 1 and June 1, except for the variable rate 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (2009 Bonds) as those interest payments were made monthly through March 2018. In April 2018, the 2018 Sales Tax Refunding Bonds (2018 Refunding Bonds) refinanced the variable rate 2009 Bonds with fixed rate bonds whereby interest will be paid semiannually. On a quarterly basis, accrued interest on the 91 Project Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan and the 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds Series B (capital appreciation) is recorded in the RCTC 91 Express Lanes Enterprise Fund accounting records; however, such interest is not paid in the current year and therefore not included in the FY 2017/18 budget. The FY 2017/18 budget includes $7.4 million related to the interest swap termination cost paid in connection with the April 2018 issuance of the 2018 Sales Tax Refunding Bonds  it will be reflected in the fourth quarter financial statements; " Cost of issuance relates to the underwriters' discount paid for the 2017A Bonds issued and the 2017 Series B Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds (2017B Refunding Bonds) issued to refund all of the outstanding 2010 Series A Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (2010A Bonds) and a portion of the outstanding 2013 Series A Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (2013 Bonds). Other costs incurred in connection with the bond issuance and refunding are reflected in professional services; " Payment to escrow agent relates to the advance refunding of all of the outstanding 2010A Bonds and a portion of the 2013A Bonds from the issuance of the 2017B Refunding Bonds. The budgeted amount includes $70.8 million related to a current refunding of the outstanding 2009 Bonds which closed in the fourth quarter; " Capital outlay expenditures are under budget due to unused budget authority for station security improvements, office and property improvements for the 1-15 Express Lanes project; and Commission office, network, hardware, and software improvements; " The Commission issued $158,760,000 of 2017A Bonds at a premium of $28.9 million to pay a portion of the costs of the 1-15 Express Lanes project and completion of the 91 Project, retire $30 million of outstanding commercial paper notes, and pay costs of issuance, including the costs of the TIFIA loan related to the 1-15 Express Lanes project. Additionally, the Commission issued $392,730,000 of 2017B Refunding Bonds at a premium of $80 million to refund outstanding 2010A Bonds and 2013A Bonds; and " The Commission entered into a loan agreement with the U.S. Department of Transportation for a $152.5 million TIFIA loan to pay eligible 1-15 Express Lanes project costs. Proceeds of the TIFIA loan may be drawn upon after certain conditions have been met. During the third quarter, the Commission drew down $0 in TIFIA loan proceeds. Agenda Item 8D 93 During construction of the 1-15 Express Lanes project and for a period of up to five years following substantial completion, interest is compounded and added to the initial TIFIA loan. TIFIA debt service payments are expected to commence June 2025, which is approximately five years after substantial completion of the 1-15 Express Lanes project, through June 2055. Attachments: 1) Quarterly Project Status — March 2018 2) Quarterly Financial Statements — March 2018 Agenda Item 8D 94 ATTACHMENT 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY PROJECT STATUS 3RD QUARTER FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED 3/31/2018 FY 2017/18 BUDGET Project Description 3rd QUARTER EXPENDITURES Project Status 91 Project (PO03028) The project connects with Orange County Transportation Authority's tolled express lanes at the Orange County/Riverside County line and continues approximately eight miles to the Interstate (I)-15/State Route (SR)-91 interchange. The project involves widening pavement on the outside of the existing highway to reposition general purpose lanes and repurposing the existing high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes to accommodate two -tolled express lanes in the median in each direction. The 91 Project also involves constructing one new general purpose lane in each direction from SR-71 to 1-15, ultimately providing two - tolled express lanes and five general purpose lanes in each direction. 91 Project development activities began in September 2007, construction work related to roadway and structures began in July 2014, and the toll lanes opened in March 2017. The total acquisition and construction cost of the 91 Project is estimated at $1.4 billion, including capitalized interest, debt service reserves, contingency, and cost of issuance. 1-15 Express Lanes project (PO03027) The project will generally add two tolled express lanes in each direction from SR-60 to Cajalco Road in Corona. Project development activities began in April 2008, and lanes are expected to open to traffic in 2020. The 2017 Base Case estimates the total project cost at $471 million, which includes $42 million of contingency. $130,026,400 128,161,400 $45,373,265 The Design -Build contract achieved substantial completion on March 20, 2017. The Systems Integration and Implementation Contract retention was released on January 4, 2018. The Commission has remitted all of the $42 million final settlement to the Design -Builder; the only remaining costs are for the plant establishment period. The Certificate of Final Acceptance was issued to the Design -Builder on March 15, 2018. The bulk of the under run of the FY 2017/18 budget at the third quarter is due to anticipated Right of Way settlements that have yet to occur. 59,678,219 The toll services contract was awarded in January 2017, the Design -Build contract was awarded in April 2017, and the project financing was completed in July 2017. A project office in Corona opened in August 2017. All 11 Bridge Type Selection Reports have been approved. Overall design is approximately 80% complete. Negotiations continue with BNSF Railway for the construction and maintenance agreement. Construction work continued on sSound-wall S1-A. The under run of the FY 2017/18 budget at the third quarter is due to under runs in the Design -Build contract ($18 million), the project construction and management (PCM) contract ($7 million), and Caltrans ($3 million). 95 FY 2017/18 BUDGET Project Description 3rd QUARTER EXPENDITURES Project Status 15/91 Express Lanes Connector (P003039) The 15/91 Express Lane Connector (ELC) project constructs an express lanes median direct connector from southbound 1-15 to westbound SR-91 and from eastbound SR-91 to northbound 1-15 in the city of Corona. The project also adds tolled -express lanes in each direction of 1-15 from the 15/91 ELC to Hidden Valley Parkway; adds a tolled -express lane in each direction of SR-91 from east of Lincoln Avenue to the 15/91 ELC; extends the tolled -express lane along eastbound SR-91 from 1-15 to west of Promenade Avenue; and extends eastbound auxiliary lane along SR-91 from west of 1-15 to west of Promenade Avenue. The project also includes the addition of a toll collection system infrastructure along 1-15 and SR-91. The estimated project cost is $180 million and the project is funded by state funds allocated under Senate Bill 132 legislation. The project activities began in April 2017 and express lanes are expected to open to traffic in 2022. Mid County Parkway (P002302, P612302, & P002317) The environmental document for a new corridor from I- 215 to SR-79 was approved in April 2015. The first design package is anticipated to be completed in FY 2018/2019. Construction of this new facility will be completed over many years as funding becomes available; the project cost is estimated at $1.3 to $1.6 billion. Pachappa Underpass project (P003038) The project will remove the Pachappa shoofly activities and construct the retaining wall, drainage, and track work for the permanent Pachappa underpass; the project construction cost is estimated at $12 million. 7,832,270 25,441,000 13,126,300 386,305 In October 2017 the Commission approved an amendment to the existing 1-15 PCM contract for ELC project approval and environmental document work. In November 2017 the Commission approved a contract with WSP USA, Inc. for ELC project management services. In January 2018 the Commission approved an amendment to the existing 1-15 PCM contract for ELC PCM support. Staff continues work on contract amendments to the Toll Services Provider and the Design -Builder for the ELC project. The under run of the FY 2017/18 budget at the third quarter is due to a slower than planned start to the PCM contract and not having a Design -Build contract in place. 1,441,043 The Commission approved the procurement for final design of the I-215-/Placentia Interchange in November 2016 and notice to proceed was issued the same month. Staff secured approval with the Federal Highway Administration of the New Connection Report. Staff continues to work on the approval of the Compensatory Mitigation Plan with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Staff continues the work on the Cultural Landscape Study for cultural resources mitigation. The Commission has acquired most of the mitigation land needed for the project. Staff continues to work on identifying the remaining mitigation land needed. Staff continues to work with state and federal agencies on permitting packages for the first construction contract. Settlement talks with plaintiffs challenging the environmental document continue. 160,915 ROW acquisition continues as well as preparation and review of the Construction and Maintenance Agreement with Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR). A few remaining design issues are under discussion by Caltrans and UPRR. 96 FY 2017/18 BUDGET Project Description 3rd QUARTER EXPENDITURES Project Status Perris Valley Line and other rail projects (P003800, P003823, P003830, P003832, P003834) The project extends commuter rail services to the city of Perris. The project commenced in December 2007 when the Commission received approval from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to move into project development. The estimated project cost is $248.3 million. Other rail projects include adding a fourth main track between the Riverside Downtown station to the connector to the San Jacinto Branch Line at Highgrove. 23,109,600 2,385,723 The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) awarded Small Starts Grant Agreement funds. ROW acquisition activities for the station and layover facility at south Perris have been completed. Following the settlement of a lawsuit challenging elements of the California Environmental Quality Act document in July 2013, the construction contract was given limited notice to proceed in October 2013 and full notice following FTA approval of the Small Starts Grant Agreement. Active construction commenced in January 2014. Metrolink operations commenced in June 2016. Substantial completion was reached in September 2016. Final completion was reached on October 20, 2017. Claim settlement was reached on January 24, 2018. This list discusses the significant capital projects (i.e., total budgeted costs in excess of $5 million) and related status. Capital project expenditures are generally affected by lags in invoices submitted by contractors and consultants, as well as issues encountered during certain phases of the projects. The capital projects budgets tend to be based on aggressive project schedules. 97 ATTACHMENT 2 Revenues Sales tax Federal reimbursements State reimbursements Local reimbursements Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Toll revenues Toll violations and fee revenues Other revenues Investment income Total revenues Expenditures Salaries and benefits Professional and support Professional services Support costs Total Professional and support costs Projects and operations Program operations - general Engineering Construction Design Build Right of way/land Operating and capital disbursements Special studies Local streets and roads Regional arterials Total projects and operations Debt service Principal Interest Cost of issuance Payment to escrow agent Total debt service Capital outlay Total Expenditures Excess revenues over (under) expenditures Other financing sources/(uses) Transfer in Transfer out Debt proceeds Bond premium Total financing sources/(uses) Net change in fund balances Fund balance July 1, 2017 Fund balance March 31, 2018 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY BUDGET TO ACTUAL 3RD QUARTER FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED 3/31/2018 FY 2017/18 BUDGET $ 282,469,000 78,563,200 17,846,070 6,840,100 22,250,000 13,979,500 2,856,300 2,803,700 3,509,400 431,117,270 9,554,200 22,593,000 11,571,110 34,164,110 28,039,890 12,052,600 76,375,100 192,838,570 88,112,500 150,505,600 3,952,000 58,085,000 30,416,000 640,377,260 66,045,000 48,566,200 6,013,600 546,300,000 666,924,800 6,871,900 1,357,892,270 (926,775,000) 314,266,500 (314,266,500) 636,250,000 119,722,000 837,782,000 (88,993,000) 687,463,600 3RD QUARTER REMAINING ACTUAL BALANCE $ 161,597,450 $ (120,871,550) 8,212,453 (70,350,747) 3,761,567 (14,084,503) 24,441 (6,815,659) 13,093,214 (9,156,786) 30,392,962 16,413,462 6,001,311 3,145,011 1,715,938 (1,087,762) 5,499,143 1,989,743 230,298,479 (200,818,791) 6,772,869 2,781,331 9,183,584 13,409,416 4,993,032 6,578,078 14,176,616 19,987,494 16,253,490 2,574,301 6,504,748 113,426,960 8,888,529 93,203,123 673,254 30,935,367 4,834,096 277,293,868 30,000,000 26,559,911 2,124, 986 471,089,840 529,774,737 1,532,231 829,550,321 (599,251,842) 230,854,574 (230,854,574) 551,490,000 108,990,018 660,480,018 61,228,176 412,734,228 11,786,400 9,478,299 69,870,352 79,411,610 79,223,971 57,302,477 3,278,746 27,149, 633 25,581,904 363,083,392 36,045,000 22,006,289 3,888,614 75, 210,160 137,150,063 5,339,669 528,341,949 541,708,862 (83,411,926) 83,411,926 (84,760,000) (10,731,982) 177,301,982 719,010,844 (274,729,372) $ 598,470,600 $ 473,962,404 $ 444,281,472 PERCENT UTILIZATION 57% 10% 21% 0% 59% 217% 210% 61% 157% 53% 71% 41% 43% 41% 58% 21% 9% 59% 10% 62% 17% 53% 16% 43% 45% 55% 35% 86% 79% 22% 61% 65% 73% 73% 87% 91% 79% -69% 60% 79% 98 GENERAL FUND RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY BUDGET TO ACTUAL BY FUND 3RD QUARTER FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED 3/31/2018 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS MEASURE A SALES TAX TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FSP/ WESTERN COACHELLA PALO VERDE LOCAL TRANSPORTATION STATE TRANSIT SAFE COUNTY VALLEY VALLEY FUND ASSISTANCE Revenues Sales tax $ - $ - $ 79,950,025 $ 22,499,067 $ 547,109 $ Federal reimbursement; 1,529,148 - 5,203,776 - - State reimbursements 512,012 2,004,897 1,244,658 Local reimbursement; - - 24,268 - - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fe: - - Toll revenue: - - Toll violations and fee revenue. - - - Other revenue: 156,633 262,179 915,082 Investment income 99,998 43,375 1,281,022 253,064 Total revenue: 2,297,791 2,310,451 88,618,831 22,752,131 547,106 TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) 51,798,819 $ 6,802,430 $ 173 13,093,214 COACHELLA OTHER AGENCY VALLEY RAIL PROJECTS - $ 86,882 7,000 505,375 383,422 417,324 16,774 662 52,304,367 7,185,852 13,517,538 103,656 662 SB132 Expenditure: Salaries and benefit: 4,152,884 73,320 1,910,262 1,548 151,414 7,551 42,510 139,766 Professional and support Professional service: 2,213,011 219,195 4,981,721 36,635 11,135 167,648 393,407 22,774 258,972 Support costs 2,941,183 141,196 407,487 73 - - - 3,511 - 387 2,429 Total Professional and support cost 5,154,194 360,391 5,389,208 36,708 - 11,135 171,159 393,407 23,161 261,401 Projects and operations Program operations -genera 1,614,179 1,643,265 7,962,849 - - - - 139,815 - 106,561 2,698 Engineerinc - - 1,440,186 - 1,085,341 4,107 44,667 Constructior - - 6,490,819 - - - - 13,929 - - - Design Builc 113,426,960 - - - Right ofway/lane - - 3,904,149 - - - - 4,938,524 - 45,856 - Operating and capital disbursement 15,479,681 4,484,556 3,865,050 68,082,044 1,291,792 - - Special studies 673,254 - - - - - - - - - Local streets and roads - 22,657,585 7,746,573 531,209 Regional arterial; - - - 4,834,096 - - - Total projects and operations 17,767,114 1,643,265 160,367,104 16,445,719 531,209 68,082,044 1,291,792 6,177,609 156,524 47,365 Debt service Principal Interest Cost of issuance Payment to escrow agem Total debt service Capital outlay 104,378 - 1,427,853 Total Expenditure: 27,178,570 2,076,976 169,094,427 16,483,975 531,209 68,082,044 1,302,927 6,500,182 400,958 222,195 448,532 Excess revenues over (under) expenditure (24,880,7791 233,475 (80,475,5961 6,268,156 15,900 (15,777,677) 5,882,925 7,017,356 (297,302) (221,533) (448,532) Other financing sources/(uses Transfer in 29,385,932 1,083,600 127,240,602 - - - Transferom (702,800) (1,221,9001 (54,158,1111 (505,106) (24,706) (16,866,132) (64,906) (342,300) (30,106) - (43,706) Debt proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - Bond premium - - - - - - - - - - - Total financing sources/(uses 28,683,132 (138,3001 73,082,491 (505,100) (24,700) (16,866,132) (64,900) (342,300) (30,100) (43,700) Net change in fund balance: 3,802,353 95,175 (7,393,1051 5,763,056 (8,800) (32,643,809) 5,818,025 6,675,056 (327,402) (221,533) (492,232) Fund balance July 1, 201-, 19,126,100 8,842,499 221,510,954 47,791,274 556 115,175,281 75,432,832 81,473,550 3,308,418 180,162 (23,054) Fund balance March 31, 2018 $ 22 928 453 $ 8 937 674 $ 214 117 849 $ 53 554 330 $ (8 244) $ 82 531 472 $ 81 250 857 $ 88 148 606 $ 2 981 016 $ (41 371) $ (515 286) Revenues Sales tax Federal reimbursement; State reimbursements Local reimbursement; Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fe: Toll revenue: Toll violations and fee revenue. Other revenues Investment income Total revenue: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY BUDGET TO ACTUAL BY FUND 3RD QUARTER FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED 3/31/2018 ENTERPRISE FUND CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS COMMERCIAL SALES TAX TOLL REVENUE TOLL OPERATIONS PAPER BONDS BONDS DEBT SERVICE COMBINED TOTAL - S - $ - $ 161,597,450 - - 1,392,647 8,212,453 - - - - 3,761,567 - - - - - 24,441 13,093,214 30,392,962 - - - - 30,392,962 6,001,311 6,001,311 375,044 - - - - 1,715,938 (37,404) 1,078,477 1,339,576 824 116,654 5,499,143 36,731,913 1,078,477 1,339,576 824 1,509,301 230,298,479 Expenditure: Salaries and benefit: 293,614 6,772,869 Professional and support Professional service: 312,136 566,950 9,183,584 Support costs 1 494 478 - 2 288 - - 4,993,032 Total Professional and support cost 1,806,614 569,238 14,176,616 Projects and operations Program operations -genera 4,784,123 - - - - 16,253,490 Engineerinc - - 2,574,301 Constructior - - - - - 6,504,748 Design Builc - 113,426,960 Right of way/lane - - - - - 8,888,529 Operating and capital disbursement - 93,203,123 Special studies - - - - - 673,254 Local streets and roads - 30,935,367 Regional arterial; - - - - - 4,834,096 Total projects and operations 4,784,123 277,293,868 Debt service Pdncipal Interest Cost of issuance Payment to escrow agem Total debt service 3,559,968 3,559,968 30,000,000 - 37,485 - 2,124,986 471,089,840 30,037,485 473,214,826 - 30,000,000 22,962,458 26,559,911 - 2,124,986 471,089,840 22,962,458 529,774,737 Capital outlay - - - - - 1,532,231 Total Expenditure: 10 444 319 30 037 485 473 784 064 - 22 962 458 829 550 321 Excess revenues over (under) expenditure 26,287,594 (28,959,008) (472,444,488) 824 (21,453,157) (599,251,842) Other financing sources/(uses Transfer in - 30,000,000 - 216,954 42,927,486 230,854,574 Transfer om (538,454) (23,465,277) (130,153,121) (1,345,332) (1,392,647) (230,854,574) Debt proceeds - - 551,490,000 - - 551,490,000 Bond premium - - 108,990,018 - - 108,990,018 Total financing sources/(uses (538,454) 6,534,723 530,326,897 (1,128,378) 41,534,839 660,480,018 Net change in fund balance: 25,749,140 (22,424,285) 57,882,409 (1,127,554) 20,081,682 61,228,176 Fund balance July 1, 201-, (293 678 840) 46 951 913 63 532 514 1 127 554 21 982 515 412,734,228 Fund balance March 31, 2018 $ (267,929,700) $ 24,527,628 $ 121,414,923 $ - $ 42,064,197 $ 473,962,404 100 AGENDA ITEM 8E RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Jose Mendoza, Procurement Analyst Matt Wallace, Procurement Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Recurring Contracts for Fiscal Year 2018/19 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the recurring contracts in an amount not to exceed $17,988,167 for Fiscal Year 2018/19, $381,600 for FYs 2019/20 — 2020/21, and $91,600 for FYs 2021/22 — 2022/23; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: As in previous years, the Commission annually evaluates existing contracts for professional services due to expire within the next fiscal year. These contracts may be placed on the calendar for a new procurement solicitation, allowed to expire since these contracts are no longer required, or included in the annual recurring contracts list that is subject to Commission approval. Most contracts for professional services are subject to a competitive process. This year's list of recurring contracts includes consultants that are providing unique or specialized services and working closely with staff on long-term projects. Staff desires to retain certain consultants on the recurring contracts list due to the consultant's historical knowledge, unique experience, and understanding of the Commission and specific Commission projects. Under limited circumstances, staff believes it is more efficient and cost effective to retain the consultants on the recurring contracts list rather than rebidding the services at this time. Approval of the recurring contracts list will allow the Commission to continue work on existing projects without interruptions and maintain consistency. Below is a list of proposed recurring contracts for FY 2018/19 and for specialized services through FY 2022/23, followed by a summary for each consultant supporting its inclusion on the recurring contracts list. Agenda Item 8E 101 Schedule of Recurring Contracts for FY 2018/19 Consultant Name Agreement Number Description of Services Budget FY 2017/18 Budget FY 2018/19 Dollar Change AMMA Transit Planning (AMMA) 08-26-115-12 Administration and support of Specialized Transit Program under Measure A and federal programs $150,000 $170,000 $20,000 Bechtel Infrastructure (Bechtel) 18-31-135-00 Capital project program management services 5,316,000 5,058,000 (258,000) Best, Best & Krieger LLP (BB&K) 18-19-160-00 General legal services 4,334,100 3,412,700 (921,400) BLX Group LLC (BLX) 11-19-104-04 Arbitrage rebate compliance and debt reporting services 10,000 15,000 5,000 Caltrans 17-31-021-01 91 Express Lanes roadway maintenance contract 245,104 233,717 (11,387) Case Systems, Inc. (Case) 13-45-102-04 Call box maintenance services 200,000 106,200 (93,800) Epic Land Solutions, Inc. (Epic) 18-33-136-00 Support services for property management of Commission -owned properties and related contracts 538,000 538,000 - Exigent Systems Inc. (Exigent) 18-12-137-00 Information technology (IT) support services 425,000 520,000 95,000 Fieldman Rolapp & Associates (Fieldman) 04-19-029-13 Financial advisory services 592,500 300,000 (292,500) Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP (Fulbright) 09-19-072-13 Disclosure counsel services 220,000 5,000 (215,000) Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) 16-31-025-03 RCTC-OCTA Facility Agreement (ROFA) — shared RCTC and OCTA costs for the 91 Express Lanes 2,663,625 5,988,750 3,325,125 Orrick, Herrick & Sutclifffe LLP (Orrick) 05-19-510-15 Bond counsel services 990,000 10,000 (980,000) Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec) 10-31-099-08 Traffic and revenue analysis and operational analysis consulting services for the 91 Express Lanes 810,000 1,200,000 390,000 Stantec 15-31-048-05 Traffic and revenue consulting services for the I-15 Express Lanes 395,500 100,000 (295,500) Agenda Item 8E 102 Schedule of Recurring Contracts for FY 2018/19 (continued) Consultant Name Agreement Number Description of Services Budget FY 2017/18 Budget FY 2018/19 Dollar Change Stantec 15-31-048-06 Traffic and revenue consulting services for the 15/91 Express Lanes Connector (15/91 ELC) $71,000 $100,000 $29,000 U.S. Bank National Association (US Bank) N/A Trustee services for the sales tax revenue bonds pursuant to master indenture agreement 25,000 40,000 15,000 Total $16,985,829 $17,797,367 $811,538 Schedule of Recurring Contracts for Specialized Services for FY 2018/19 — FY 2020/21 Consultant Name Agreement Numbers Description of Services Budget FY 2017/18 Budget FY 2018/19 3-Year Contract The Mathis Group 17-18-097-01 Organizational assessment services $100,000 $50,000 $150,000 TSC2 Group 18-15-139-00 Integrated communication services 195,000 95,000 285,000 Total $295,000 $145,000 5435,000 Schedule of Recurring Contracts for Specialized Services for FY 2018/19 — FY 2022/23 Consultant Name Agreement Numbers Description of Services Budget FY 2017/18 Budget FY 2018/19 5-Year Contract UC Riverside Center for Economic Forecasting and Development (UCR Forecast) 13-19-153-01 Sales tax forecasting services $9,500 $11,000 $55,000 MuniServices, LLC 13-19-152-01 Sales tax audit and reporting services 24,000 34,800 174,000 Total $33,500 $45,800 $229,000 sThese are contracts with consultants providing specialized services on long-term projects at a fixed rate. The contracts do not need to be negotiated annually as service level and pricing are not expected to change during the period of performance. Staff desires to enter into a multi -year agreement with each of these consultants for the aggregate amount shown above. AMMA Transit Planning In February 2007, AMMA Transit Planning (AMMA) was selected under a competitive procurement process to provide consulting services for the development and implementation of the Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan, as well as the required annual updates. AMMA also guides staff regarding the grant application process for the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, the Commission's Title VI program, and the Citizens Advisory Committee process. Additionally, AMMA advises staff on the management of operator reporting for the Agenda Item 8E 103 current specialized transit call for projects, assists in the development of the application and eligibility guidelines for future specialized transit call for projects, and aides in the management of the transit needs and community input meetings. Bechtel Infrastructure Corporation The Bechtel Infrastructure Corporation (Bechtel) contract for FY 2018/19 reflects a decrease from the prior year as a result of the closeout of the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (91 Project) and reduction in office facility costs due to the move back to the County Administrative Center. Bechtel continues to provide program management and construction management activities of highway and rail projects for the 2009 Measure A program, as well as the wrap up of the 1989 Measure A program. Significant capital projects for which Bechtel provides staff support includes the Interstate 15 Express Lanes project (1-15 ELP), the I-215/Placentia Avenue Interchange, the I-15/Railroad Canyon Road interchange, and the Pachappa Underpass project. Bechtel possesses the knowledge and background history of the Commission's capital works program, which is necessary to deliver the Commission's Measure A projects. The flexibility of obtaining additional support from Bechtel as needed for specific project requirements is also important and avoids the need to increase Commission staff. Best Best & Krieger LLP The FY 2018/19 contract for Best Best & Krieger LLP (BB&K) reflects a net decrease of 21 percent in legal costs compared to the FY 2017/18 contract, primarily related to the completion of the 91 Project and the Perris Valley Line project. A high level of general legal services is generally required from BB&K for highway and rail capital project activities, especially right of way. BB&K also provides support related to procurements and contract development. The Commission engaged other legal firms for specific matters involving potential conflicts of interest, as well as other specialized legal services. BLX Group LLC In 2007, the Commission engaged BLX Group LLC (BLX) under a sole source procurement to perform arbitrage rebate compliance services for sales tax revenue debt issued under the 1989 Measure A and 2009 Measure A, as required by the Internal Revenue Service and the tax certificates executed for each debt issue. Initially, this included commercial paper notes and sales tax revenue bonds that were issued. Because of the 91 Project financing in 2013, arbitrage calculations are also required for the toll revenue bonds issued. In order to ensure the Commission is complying with the complex arbitrage rebate regulations, it elected to have BLX perform the required calculations more frequently than the minimum reporting requirements during the life of each debt issue. Accordingly, BLX maintains historical information and calculations considered in subsequent arbitrage rebate calculations. Additionally, California Senate Bill 2019 (SB 1029) requires the Commission to prepare and file an Annual Debt Transparency Report (ADTR) for new debt issuances effective January 1, 2017. BLX will prepare the ADTRs for the two bond issuances in 2017 and the recent bond issuance in 2018 at no Agenda Item 8E 104 additional cost when arbitrage rebate calculations are prepared or for a $500 per ADTR fee when rebate calculations have ceased. Either party upon written notice may terminate the agreement with BLX; however, staff determined it would be more efficient and cost effective to continue the contract due to the three bond issuances in FY 2017/18 requiring arbitrage rebate calculations and the new SB 1029 filing requirements. Furthermore, BLX is affiliated with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, which results in additional efficiencies related to immediate access to bond documents and key staff. Caltrans In October 2016, the Commission awarded an agreement to Caltrans to provide routine and emergency maintenance for the 91 Express Lanes for a 50-year term; however, the initial agreement covered costs through FY 2017/18. Caltrans' familiarity with the 91 Corridor, 91 Project, and state standards for highway maintenance ensures that the Commission will be in compliance with the 91 Express Lanes Toll Facility Agreement between Caltrans and the Commission executed in May 2012. In addition, Caltrans has the staff, equipment, and experience to provide the wide range of maintenance and emergency response services required to ensure the 91 Express Lanes are properly maintained and that emergency incidents are resolved in an expedient manner. Caltrans routine maintenance services include channelizer replacement, pavement repair, and sweeping and debris removal. The scope of services also includes coordination with California Highway Patrol Maintenance Zone Enhancement Enforcement Program (MAZEEP). Staff and Caltrans established a work plan for FY 2018/19 that does not exceed the allowable 3 percent increase from the prior year work plan. Caltrans has provided excellent service and response times to emergency incidents. Caltrans District 8 has coordinated well with Caltrans District 12 for the routine maintenance closures shortening the length of the closure time. After more than a year of working with Caltrans to provide the 91 Express Lanes Roadway maintenance, staff determined that Caltrans is the most efficient and cost effective provider for the 91 Express Lanes roadway maintenance services. Case Systems, Inc. In May 2013, the Commission awarded a three-year agreement to Case Systems, Inc. (Case) for call box maintenance services following a competitive bid and exercised the first and second option years in FYs 2016/17 and 2017/18. Over the last two decades, the number of call boxes has been reduced primarily in response to declining demand, the proliferation of cell phone ownership and expansion of cell coverage, and costs associated with updating the call boxes to remain compatible with continuously evolving cellular technology. The most recent reduction approved by the Commission in 2016 left a safety net of 241 call boxes in Riverside County, which received 412 calls in FY 2016/17. In 2004, the program footprint consisted of nearly 1,100 call boxes that received 23,700 calls in a year. Staff recommends the Commission retain Case through June 30, 2019. During FY 2018/19 staff will conduct a comprehensive assessment of the call box program with recommendations (i.e., a potential sunset of the call box program) ahead of the next cellular upgrade in January 2020. Agenda Item 8E 105 Epic Land Solutions, Inc. Due to its accumulated knowledge and development of various property management projects, resources, and databases associated with the multitude of Commission -owned properties, including but not limited to those along the San Jacinto Branch Line (SJBL), staff determined that Epic Land Solutions, Inc. (Epic) can most efficiently and cost effectively provide property management services. The scope of services for FY 2018/19 includes: • Upgrading the remaining utility licenses to current Commission terms in order to minimize liability risks; • Renewing expiring private use agreements; • Coordinating and assisting with activities related to the issuance of new licenses, amendments to existing licenses or facility upgrades; • Following up on delinquent rent payments and tracking insurance certifications, as requested by Commission staff; • Determining all easement locations and requesting abandonment of unused easements; • Maintaining and updating a database and correlated mapping of the Commission's property and contract information; • Insuring possession of title policies for all Commission owned property; • Insuring compliance with federal excess land requirements; and • Resolving complex title issues. Epic will also proactively perform regular site visits to all properties to identify and resolve maintenance and repair issues such as weed abatement, removal of debris and illegal occupants as well as identify encroachments such as illegal parking or the installation of facilities without a license. Epic has completed many of the property management tasks that only require on -going maintenance and review; however, the number of properties to be inspected on a regular basis has increased. Therefore, the estimated fees are comparable to the prior year. Exigent Systems Inc. FY 2016/17 and FY 2017/18 agreements with Exigent Systems, Inc. (Exigent) were executed under the Executive Director's single signature authority to provide additional IT support services. The immediate need was to address technology needs created by the opening of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes. The Commission also retained Exigent to provide overall end -user help desk support, desktop hardware replacement, remote site integration/turn-up/turn-down, IT integration management and support with capital project contractors, after-hours on -call services, storage infrastructure replacement, security, auditing, and planning. In FY 2018/19 staff anticipates utilizing Exigent to undertake projects such as the Eden Financial Software migration to a new platform and securing IT operational needs for new project offices. Staff intends to conduct a competitive procurement for IT services in FY 2018/19. Agenda Item 8E 106 Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Inc. Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates, Inc. (Fieldman) was selected as the Commission's financial advisor in late 2003, following a competitive procurement process, and has provided financial advisory services on general finance matters and specific financing transactions related to the 2009 Measure A program and the toll program. Fieldman played a significant role in the 91 Project and 1-15 ELP financing activities that achieved financial close in July 2013 and July 2017, respectively. Fieldman continues to provide additional support for the 91 Project and 1-15 ELP related to the annual update of the financial models and financial plans required by the TIFIA loan agreements, as well as other implementation matters related to these financings and related projects. As a result of Fieldman's knowledge and understanding of the Commission, its previous financings, and the TIFIA loan process, staff determined it would be more efficient and cost effective for continuity purposes to retain Fieldman during FY 2018/19 for financial advisory services. Staff expects lower costs in FY 2018/19, as FY 2017/18 included three financings and the renewal of the commercial paper program's credit and liquidity support. Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP In July 2009, the Commission awarded a professional services agreement to Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP (Fulbright) for disclosure counsel services through a competitive procurement in connection with the Commission's 2009 sales tax revenue bond issuance. The Commission has periodically amended the agreement for subsequent debt transactions, including the financing for the 91 Project and 1-15 ELP. Staff determined it would be more efficient and cost effective to continue to retain Fulbright in connection with potential continuing disclosure matters. Staff expects significantly reduced costs in FY 2018/19, as FY 2017/18 included three financings and the renewal of the commercial paper program's credit and liquidity support; no debt financings are anticipated in FY 2018/19. Orange County Transportation Authority In support of the 91 Express Lanes, the Commission and Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) (the agencies) entered into the RCTC-OCTA Facility Agreement (ROFA) in November 2015 to facilitate the reimbursement of shared costs during the life of the agencies' cooperative agreement executed in December 2011. The ROFA allows the Commission to reimburse OCTA for shared costs it incurs on behalf of the joint operation of the 91 Express Lanes and for OCTA to reimburse the Commission for costs it incurs on behalf of the joint operation. OCTA and the Commission meet each year to divide the administration of contracts and costs for the 91 Express Lanes operation. Prior ROFA amendments include the joint use of and improvements to the customer service center and payments to third -party vendors for costs administered by the toll operator. The FY 2018/19 costs relate to the ongoing joint operation and maintenance of the toll facility. Staff coordinated with OCTA and the toll operator to identify the ROFA shared cost budget for FY 2018/19. Staff recommends approval of the ROFA's FY 2018/19 budget to continue to reimburse OCTA and pay third -party vendors for costs incurred on behalf of the 91 Express Lanes. The FY 2018/19 costs are approximately $3.3 million higher than FY 2017/18 primarily Agenda Item 8E 107 due to costs related to the 6C transponder transition occurring in FY 2018/19. Since OCTA will reimburse the Commission for such costs, the net increase to the Commission is $1.65 million. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP (Orrick) was selected as bond counsel in late 2004, following a competitive procurement process, and has provided bond counsel services in connection with the financings and other matters related to the 2009 Measure A program, including the 91 Project and 1-15 ELP. Orrick has a high level understanding of the Commission's 2009 Measure A program and related sales tax financings as well as the complex toll -supported debt agreements. It also has significant experience with other transportation agencies, especially self-help counties and TIFIA loan borrowers. Staff determined it would be more efficient and cost effective to continue to retain Orrick in connection with potential debt agreement matters. Staff expects significantly reduced costs in FY 2018/19, as FY 2017/18 included three financings and the renewal of the commercial paper program's credit and liquidity support; no debt financings are anticipated in FY 2018/19. Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. — RCTC 91 Express Lanes In September 2010, Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec) was selected under a competitive procurement process to provide consulting services for the development of the investment grade traffic and revenue study, which secured the financing for the 91 Project. Stantec performed the field work and analysis required to create the traffic and revenue model. Additionally, Stantec supported the development of the toll pricing methodology and traffic simulations, which supported corridor design decisions. Stantec continues to support staff with traffic simulation necessary to improve certain elements of design, the analysis of actual traffic and revenue results compared to those projected, travel time studies, and the adjustment of the toll rates. Stantec's long -history of supporting the 91 Project provides staff with valuable insight into the actual performance of the express lanes. Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. —1-15 ELP In April 2015, the Commission selected Stantec under a competitive procurement process to provide consulting services for the development of the investment grade traffic and revenue study to secure financing for the 1-15 ELP. Subsequent contract amendments authorized field work and analysis required to create the traffic and revenue model. Stantec's continued support of the 1-15 ELP is needed for data collection, existing conditions analysis, model calibrations, microsimulation, finalization of the traffic and revenue forecast, and sensitivity and risk analysis. Due to Stantec's accumulated project knowledge and successful completion of deliverables, staff determined that Stantec can most efficiently and cost effectively provide these services for the 1-15 ELP. Agenda Item 8E 108 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. —15/91 ELC In March 2018, the Commission amended Stantec's competitively procured contract for the 1-15 Express Lanes Project to include the scope of work for the 15/91 ELC as permitted by AB 115. The scope of work included simulation modeling, impact assessment of the operation for existing express lanes, traffic volume data collection, and a traffic and revenue study. Due to Stantec's accumulated knowledge and successful completion of contract deliverables, staff determined that Stantec can most efficiently and cost effectively provide these services for the 15/91 ELC. U.S. Bank National Association U.S. Bank National Association (US Bank) served as trustee for the sales tax financings since the inception of the 1989 Measure A program; the current US Bank represents mergers, acquisitions, and name changes dating back to the 1990s. As trustee and in accordance with the debt agreements, US Bank intercepts the Measure A sales tax receipts from the State Board of Equalization in order to withhold amounts required for debt service prior to releasing remaining funds to the Commission. In February 2005 following a competitive procurement, the Commission approved agreements with US Bank to serve as the trustee and the issuing and paying agent for the commercial paper program related to interim financing for the 2009 Measure A program. When the Commission commenced 2009 Measure A program long-term debt financings prior to the July 2009 start of the new Measure A, the Commission continued to use US Bank as trustee for the 2009 Measure A program. The master and supplemental indentures for the commercial paper program and the sales tax bonds are agreements between the Commission and US Bank through the life of the debt; any removal or resignation of the trustee requires adhering to specific procedures described in the master indenture. Staff has been satisfied with US Bank's level of service and recommends continuation of US Bank's role as trustee for the sales tax financings and as issuing and paying agent for the commercial paper program. The increase in FY 2018/19 fees relates to the additional trust accounts established in connection with the three FY 2017/18 financings. Specialized Services on Long -Term Projects for Three -Year Contracts The Mathis Group Routinely, the Commission requires organizational assessment services in the planning for growth and development of staff. As a public sector management psychologist, Dr. Bill Mathis of The Mathis Group provides the building blocks needed in order to develop leadership, set goals, and advance communication skills. To improve current job success for individuals and support employee retention for the organization, Dr. Mathis offers a targeted approach to organizational assessments in addition to developing the talents of staff. The Commission has utilized Dr. Mathis for more than 12 years for various projects with much success since he is familiar with staff and the overall philosophy of the agency. Management desires to continue these organizational assessment services over the next three fiscal years. Agenda Item 8E 109 TSC2 Group TSC2 Group owner and president, Tom Skancke, began representing the Commission as its federal advocate in 2007 after a competitive procurement process. Mr. Skancke was appointed by Congress to the National Surface Transportation Policy & Revenue Study Commission and recently served as a Governor's appointee to the Nevada Department of Transportation Board of Directors. As the Commission's representative, Mr. Skancke crafted the Commission's intergovernmental and communications strategy while building necessary relationships that led to securing the $421 million TIFIA loan for the 91 Project after a multi -year effort in Washington D.C. and Sacramento. Mr. Skancke further assisted the Commission in pursuing other federal grants, securing invitations to testify before Congress, and developing key messages and tactics to elevate the Commission's profile as it sought to compete for funding and successfully deliver Measure A projects. Mr. Skancke's original contract ended in 2012. In 2015, the Commission retained his company's services, pursuant to the Executive Director's single signature agreement authority, to develop an integrated communication strategy for the Commission. The impetus for this procurement was to address pressing communication issues related to the 91 Project and to eventually address all of the Commission's communication efforts. Mr. Skancke's historical knowledge and successful experience in strategy, message, and tactics related to the 91 corridor and public relations related to Riverside County transportation issues is unique and not readily replicable. Staff is satisfied with TSC2's work and recommends continuity of strategic and crisis communications advisory services. Continuity of knowledge and strategy is important as the Commission enters its second year of 91 Express Lanes operations, begins construction of 1-15 Express Lanes, explores a potential local funding measure in 2020, and continues to enhance its communications with Riverside County residents. However, staff proposes to reduce the scope and cost of the current TSC2 contract, which included the services of AlphaVu, an advanced social media intelligence company that provided critical data to the Commission over the last two years and assisted with launching the Commission's social media program. While staff is pleased with AlphaVu's work, staff also believes the services of TSC2 and AlphaVu are sufficiently different in nature to justify procuring social media intelligence and analytics services through a competitive procurement process in the near future. Staff proposes a $7,500 per month retainer fee for TSC2 over a three-year term; the fee is similar to the current retainer fee paid to the Commission's federal advocates and the fee paid to Mr. Skancke in 2007-2012. Staff also proposes no more than $5,000 per year for reimbursable direct expenses and travel, subject to staff approval. Agenda Item 8E 110 Specialized Services on Long -Term Projects for Five -Year Contracts UC Riverside Center for Economic Forecasting and Development In January 2012, the Commission selected Beacon Economics (Beacon) to perform semi-annual Measure A and Local Transportation Fund sales tax forecasting services through May 2013 under a sole source procurement and single signature authority by the Executive Director. In connection with the recurring contracts presented to the Commission in June 2013, the Commission approved a new five-year agreement with Beacon through June 2018. Over the years, Beacon built a reputation as one of California's leading economic research firms and conducted economic impact studies of the 91 Project and 1-15 ELP. Beacon's sales tax forecasts have been utilized by the Commission in connection with debt financings and strategic planning. In 2015 Beacon partnered with the UC Riverside School of Business Administration to establish the UCR Forecast —leveraging Beacon's expertise to create a local research center for the Inland Southern California economy. As a result of Beacon's significant experience forecasting the economies of the nation, the state, and the Inland Empire area and its development of highly valued, proprietary economic forecast models, staff recommends the Commission execute a new agreement with UCR Forecast for a five-year term to provide continuity and maintain consistency in the development of the Commission's sales tax forecasts. MuniServices, LLC, an Avenu Insights & Analytics Company The Commission selected MuniServices, LLC (MuniServices) for sales tax audit and reporting services in late 2007 under a sole source procurement. MuniServices specializes in sales tax audit services for the half -cent sales tax for transportation purposes in California. In its role as the Commission's sales tax audit and reporting services provider, MuniServices audits Riverside County businesses' quarterly sales tax reports and submits findings to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration for review and determination of errors of sales tax reporting. MuniServices has recovered $8.5 million in additional sales tax revenues for the Commission through the third quarter of 2017. In addition to the sales tax audit services of the Commission's Measure A sales taxes, MuniServices also provides sales tax tracking and analysis reports and face-to-face sales tax reviews and training sessions. Accordingly, staff determined it would be more efficient and cost effective to continue to retain MuniServices in connection with its sales tax audit and reporting services. Agenda Item 8E 111 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2018/19 Amount: $17,988,167 N/A FY 2019/20+ $ 473,200 Measure A, Transportation Development Act, Transportation No Source of Funds: Uniform Mitigation Fees, toll revenues, Budget Adjustment: N/A interest, and other reimbursements GL/Project Accounting No.: Various Fiscal Procedures Approved: \lia4/44Alitibu Date: 05/30/2018 Agenda Item 8E 112 AGENDA ITEM 8F RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Matt Wallace, Procurement Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Revisions to the Procurement Policy Manual STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve the revised Riverside County Transportation Commission Procurement Policy Manual (PPM) for the procurement and contracting activities undertaken by the Commission, pursuant to legal counsel review as to conformance to state and federal law; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 18-008, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Regarding the Revised Procurement Policy Manual". BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission's initial PPM was adopted in April 2007, in response to the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) 2006 Triennial Review. Since then, the Commission adopted a comprehensive PPM in July 2012 and approved several revisions to the PPM through December 2017 to update and comply with FTA, Federal Highway Administration, Caltrans, other state and federal, and Commission regulations. In December 2017, the Commission approved a revised version of the PPM as a result of the following: • Caltrans' Incurred Cost Audit completed October 2017; • Additional changes to the Office of Management and Budget's issuance of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards; and • Other best practices. In January 2018, Caltrans Division of Local Assistance provided additional comments/suggestions to the revised PPM to finalize the Caltrans Incurred Cost Audit. Agenda Item 8F 113 The changes to the PPM consist of the following: • Chapter 1 Procurement Process revisions related to recurring contracts limitations and on -call contract term limits; • Chapter 2 Procurement Generally revisions related to Public Interest Findings for non- competitive procurements and use of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual; • Chapter 8 References to Applicable Laws/Regulations updates. Staff recommends approval of these revisions and to adopt Resolution No. 18-008 related to the revised PPM. Attachments: 1) Riverside County Transportation Commission Procurement Policy Manual (Revision No. 4) 2) Resolution No. 18-008 Agenda Item 8F 114 ATTACHMENT 1 Riverside County Transportation Commission Procurement Policy Manual (Pending June 13December 13, 20187) 116 Riverside County Transportation Commission CHAPTER 1- PROCUREMENT PROCESS 1 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1 2.0 PROCUREMENT POLICY STATEMENT 1 3.0 PROCUREMENT STANDARDS 24- 4.0 TYPES OF CONTRACTS 6 5.0 OPTIONS 10 6.0 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS 12 7.0 RECURRING CONTRACTS 13 CHAPTER 2 - PROCUREMENT GENERALLY 151-4 1.0 IMPLEMENTATION BY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR; COMMISSION CONTROLS AND LIMITATIONS 1544 2.0 PROCUREMENT OFFICER DESIGNATION AND DELEGATION 174-6 3.0 PROCUREMENT OFFICER -DUTIES 174-6 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION OF PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES 1847 5.0 AUTHORIZED METHODS OF PROCUREMENT; SELECTION 184-7 6.0 INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE 194g 7.0 COST/PRICE ANALYSIS 2049 8.0 VENDOR CONTACTS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SOLICITATION 2049 9.0 ADVERTISING/PUBLICIZING PROCUREMENTS 2149 10.0 NON-DISCRIMINATION IN PROCUREMENT 2120 11.0 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 2120 12.0 DUTIES OF COMMISSION STAFF REGARDING PROCUREMENTS 2220 13.0 INSURANCE 2423 14.0 SUBCONTRACTING 2524 15.0. DETERMINATION OF FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE 2624 16.0 CONTRACT APPROVAL, AWARD, AND EXECUTION 2725 17.0 PROTEST PROCEDURES 2726 18.0 PUBLIC RECORDS REQUESTS 2927 CHAPTER 3 - COMPETITIVE SEALED BIDS ("LOW BID") 3028 CHAPTER 4 - ALTERNATE DELIVERY CONTRACTS 3331 1.0 PURPOSE 3334 2.0 PROCEDURES FOR DESIGN -BUILD CONTRACTS 3334 CHAPTER 5 - COMPETITIVELY NEGOTIATED PROCUREMENTS 353-3 1.0 NEGOTIATED PROCUREMENTS -GENERAL 3532 2.0 SOURCE SELECTION TECHNIQUES 3532 3.0 PROPOSAL EVALUATION 3633 4.0 REJECTION OF PROPOSALS 3734 5.0 NEGOTIATION; SELECTION 3734 Procurement Policy Manual JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 117 Riverside County Transportation Commission 6.0 SPECIAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ARCHITECT -ENGINEER AND RELATED SERVICES 3734 CHAPTER 6 - SIMPLIFIED PURCHASE PROCEDURES 3936 1.0 GENERAL 3936 2.0 REQUIREMENTS FOR MICROPURCHASES 3936 3.0 USE OF SMALL PURCHASE PROCEDURES 3936 4.0 PROHIBITED USE OF SMALL PURCHASE PROCEDURES 403-7 CHAPTER 7 - NON-COMPETITIVE AND EMERGENCY PROCUREMENTS AND REMEDIAL MEASURES 4138 1.0 NON-COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENTS 4138 2.0 EMERGENCY PROCUREMENTS; REMEDIAL MEASURES 423-9 3.0 WRITTEN JUSTIFICATION FOR EMERGENCY AND OTHER NON- COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENTS 4340 CHAPTER 8 - REFERENCES TO APPLICABLE LAWS /REGULATIONS 4543 1.0 GENERAL 45/12 2.0 REFERENCES 45/12 3.0 FTA/FHWA-FUNDED PROCUREMENT BY NON-COMPETITIVE (SOLE SOURCE) PROPOSALS 4845 4.0 DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS 4946 5.0 GEOGRAPHICAL PREFERENCES 5046 6.0 REVENUE CONTRACTS 5046 7.0 STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS 504-7 CHAPTER 9 - DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS PROPERTY 5349 1.0 DEFINITIONS 5349 2.0 DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY 5349 3.0 DISPOSAL OF PERSONAL PROPERTY 5349 CHAPTER 10 - OTHER PROCUREMENT MATTERS 5450 1.0 DISPUTES, CLAIMS, AND CHANGES -DEFINITIONS 5450 2.0 DISPUTES, CLAIMS, AND CHANGES -GENERAL 5450 3.0 TERMINATION 5450 4.0 BONDS, OTHER SECURITIES AND INSURANCE 5652 5.0 CONTRACT CLOSEOUT 5753 CHAPTER 11- PAYMENT 5854 1.0 COMMISSION PAYMENT PROCESS 5854 2.0 PROGRESS PAYMENTS 5854 3.0 PROMPT PAYMENT TO SUBCONTRACTORS -FEDERALLY FUNDED AGREEMENTS 5955 4.0 PAYMENT OF RETENTION ON PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS 5955 5.0 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT CERTIFICATION 5955 Procurement Policy Manual ii JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 118 CHAPTER 1- PROCUREMENT PROCESS 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE A. The Riverside County Transportation Commission (hereinafter "ROTC" or "Commission") procures goods and services using public funds. It has a responsibility to uphold the public trust and maximize the value of public funds by using them as efficiently and cost-effectively as possible. B. This Procurement Policy Manual (Manual) sets forth a general procurement policy and set of standards that will govern the conduct of Commission procurement activities and of Commission personnel engaged in those activities. The policies contained herein are advisory, not mandatory, except as related to applicable state or federal laws, and any deviation therefrom shall not render any contract of the Commission void or voidable. This manual is for Commission internal purposes only and shall not create any rights in any third parties. Compliance with the provisions in this Manual related to state or federal funding is required in order to maintain funding eligibility. C. This Manual is intended to supersede, in its entirety, the Commission's Procurement Policies Manual which was adopted on December 13September 9, 20175. D. As used herein, "FHWA" refers to the Federal Highway Administration; "FTA" refers to the Federal Transit Administration; and "Caltrans" refers to the California Department of Transportation. 2.0 PROCUREMENT POLICY STATEMENT A. The Commission procurement policies establish the guidelines and policies for procuring the goods and services necessary for the Commission to carry out its responsibilities and duties. The policies are intended to maintain the integrity of the Commission's procurement process, while ensuring that purchases are made in a cost effective, timely manner; with fair and open competition; and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. B. The objectives of the Commission's Procurement Policy Manual are to: 1. Maximize the value received for the Commission's expenditure of public funds; 2. Protect assets and/or services purchased with public funds and ensure their application in the Commission's interests; 3. Provide all vendors an equal opportunity to provide needed goods and/or services; and 4. Protect the integrity and reputation of the Commission, its officers, and its employees. 5. Ensure compliance with state and federal funding requirements, as applicable. Procurement Policy Manual 1 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 119 3.0 PROCUREMENT STANDARDS A. General 1. Contract Administration System. The Commission will maintain a contract administration system that helps ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their respective contracts. a. Contract administration activities may include the following: i. Receive, evaluate, and act on value engineering and other change proposals. ii. Negotiate cost and schedule impact related to change orders and other contract modifications. iii. Process disputes under the contract's disputes clause. iv. Review and approve payments under any progress payments clause. v. Ensure that invoiced personnel charges are for positions and classifications included in the contract. If new positions or classifications are required, they must be included pursuant to a written contract amendment dated prior to the date costs are incurred. vi. Ensure that hourly rates and other costs are billed at the contracted rates. The contracted rates may not be changed, except in accordance with the terms of the contract, or as legally allowed based on specific findings approved by the Commission members. vii. Monitor progress and ensure timely notification of anticipated overrun. viii. Monitor financial status and advise if contract performance is jeopardized. ix. Issue task orders and ensure that the basis for payment set forth in any task order is consistent with the terms of the contract and the hourly rates included in the contract, as applicable. x. Perform property administration. xi. Ensure contractor compliance with quality assurance requirements. xii. Evaluate, for adequacy, the contractor's engineering efforts and management systems that relate to design, development, production and testing. xiii. Evaluate and make recommendations on contractor requests for waivers and deviations. Procurement Policy Manual 2 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 120 xiv. Monitor contractor's small and disadvantaged business subcontracting. xv. Ensure timely submission of required reports. xvi. Administer special clauses such as drug and alcohol testing. xvii. Receive, inspect, and accept or reject partial deliveries and final deliveries of all contract deliverables. xviii. Assist in contract close out. b. The administration of construction contracts may be further supplemented by the Caltrans Construction Manual or other manual developed for a specific project, as required. 2. Avoid Duplicative Purchases. Commission staff should regularly review proposed and planned procurements to avoid purchase of unnecessary or duplicative items. 3. Lease vs. Purchase Analysis. Where appropriate, an analysis should be made of lease versus purchase alternatives and any other appropriate analysis to determine the most economical procurement approach. 4. Value Engineering. When appropriate and in the Commission's best interests, the Commission will encourage the use of value engineering by including applicable clauses in contracts for appropriate equipment purchases and construction projects. 5. Award to Responsive and Responsible Contractors. The Commission will make awards only to responsive and responsible contractors, as determined by the Commission, possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed contract. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy as implemented by applicable laws and regulations, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. a. In connection with the responsibility determination for federally funded procurements, a check of debarment and suspension must be performed and documented in the procurement records. 6. Commission Rejection of Bids, Quotes, and/or Proposals. The Commission, to the extent permitted by applicable laws, may reject any and all bids, quotes and/or proposals and re -advertise at its sole discretion. The Commission should ensure that such rights are clearly stated in all Commission bid documents. 7. Procurement Records. Records sufficient to document the significant history of each procurement activity should be maintained and retained by the Commission in accordance with the Commission's records retention policy. At a minimum, these records should include: a. The rationale for the method of procurement; Procurement Policy Manual 3 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 121 b. Selection of contract type; c. Reasons for contractor selection or rejection; and d. The basis for the contract price. 8. Specifications. The Commission will have clear and accurate contract specifications or statements of work that identify all requirements that offerors must fulfill. Additionally, written selection procedures for formal procurements shall be prepared to help ensure fair, unbiased evaluation of competing proposals. a. For federally funded procurements, the Commission is prohibited from unduly restricting competition or placing unreasonable requirements on firms in order for them to qualify to do business (e.g., unnecessary experience and excessive bonding requirements). 9. Brand Name or Equal. The use of "brand name or equal" purchase descriptions may be permitted: a. Only when an adequate specification cannot be provided without performing an inspection and analysis in time for the acquisition under consideration; and b. When minimum needs are carefully identified and those salient physical and functional characteristics of the brand name product are clearly set forth in the solicitation. c. For non -federally funded procurements, as otherwise permitted by state law. This section is not intended to impose limitations on the Commission's ability to require a brand name when the procurement is not federally funded and is not a "public work" subject to the requirements contained in the California Public Utilities Code (PUC). 10. Audit Provisions. Every Commission contract wherein contractor or other entity is receiving Commission funds in excess of $10,000 should include a provision allowing examination and audit of records related to the contract by the Commission's auditor for a period of three years after final payment under the terms of the contract. 11. Violations or Breach of Contract. All contracts exceeding $100,000 should include administrative, contractual, or legal remedies for violations or breach of the contract by the contractor. 12. Termination Clause. All contracts in excess of $25,000, and public works contracts in excess of $2,000, should provide for the termination of the contract for the Commission's convenience, and all contracts should provide for the termination of the contract for default in cases of contractor breach or non-performance. Federally funded contracts in excess of $10,000 must provide for both termination for convenience and cause. Procurement Policy Manual 4 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 122 13. Issues not Included in the Procurement Policy Manual. If a policy, procedure or particular strategy or practice is in the best interest of the Commission and is not specifically addressed, nor prohibited by statute or case law, users of this Manual should not assume it is prohibited. Rather, the absence of direction should be interpreted as permitting the Executive Director to innovate and use sound business judgment that is otherwise consistent with law and within the limits of his or her authority. B. Written Standards of Conduct 1. Conflicts of Interest. All Commission members, officers, employees and other agents must conduct the procurement process so as to avoid conflicts of interest, real or apparent. To maintain full and open competition, no Commission member, officer, employee or other agent, or his or her immediate family member, partner, or organization that employs or is about to employ any of the foregoing individuals may participate in the selection, award, or administration of any Commission contract if a conflict of interest, prohibited by law, would be involved. For federally - funded contracts, the foregoing shall also apply when any of those individuals previously listed has a financial or other interest in the firm selected for award. In addition to the foregoing, all procurements must be conducted in accordance with the most current version of the "Conflict of Interest Code for the Riverside County Transportation Commission" adopted pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974 (as amended). 2. Lobbying and Gifts. Commission officers, employees, agents and Commission members must comply with applicable state and federal law regarding acceptance of gifts, gratuities, or favors from contractors, potential contractors, or parties to subcontractor agreements. For federally -funded procurements, Commission officers, employees, agents or Commission members may neither solicit nor accept gifts, gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors, potential contractors, or parties to subcontracts; provided that exceptions may apply if, as determined by the Executive Director, the financial interest is not substantial or the gift is an unsolicited item of nominal intrinsic value. For federally -funded procurements, nominal value shall mean under fifty dollars ($50). 3. Violations. a. The violation of these Standards of Conduct by Commission employees will subject the violator to any disciplinary proceedings or action deemed appropriate by the Executive Director. Employees may correct a violation in any manner provided for under the Political Reform Act, and its implementing regulations. b. The violation of any of these Standards of Conduct by Commission members or officers will require correction of the violation in any manner provided for under the Political Reform Act, and its implementing regulations. Procurement Policy Manual 5 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 123 c. Contractors or subcontractors that violate these Standards of Conduct as relates to an active federally -funded procurement may be prohibited from bidding on the procurement, or may be subject to other action as deemed appropriate by the Executive Director. d. Agents of the Commission that violate these Standards of Conduct as relates to federally -funded procurements may be prohibited from participation on behalf of the Commission on federally funded projects, or subject to other action as deemed appropriate by the Executive Director. 4. Prohibited Communications. To avoid any appearance of impropriety, instructions to bidders in solicitation documents should prohibit contacts of any kind from proposers/bidders with any Commission member or any Commission staff, other than the Procurement Officer, during an open procurement. Violation of this condition may result in immediate disqualification of a bid or proposal. This provision is not meant to prohibit communications between Commission staff and existing consultants/contractors related to existing business which the consultant/contractor is under contract to perform on behalf of the Commission. 4.0 TYPES OF CONTRACTS A. General Provisions 1. The Procurement Officer should use the types of contracts described in this Chapter for most types of procurement, except as otherwise provided for certain small purchases described hereunder in Chapter 6. Innovative contracting arrangements are not prohibited, but require the advance approval of the Executive Director or the Commission, as specified herein. 2. The "cost -plus -percentage -of -cost" method of contracting shall not be used for state or federally funded contracts. 3. The Procurement Officer, in consultation with the project manager, should select the type of contract that is most appropriate to the circumstances of each procurement, in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. 4. In procurements by other than competitive sealed bidding, the Procurement Officer may negotiate a contract type and price (or estimated cost and fee) that will result in reasonable contractor risk and provide the contractor with the greatest incentive for efficient and economical performance. B. Selecting Contract Types 1. The type of contract to be used should be determined prior to the solicitation, and the solicitation should inform bidders of the type of contract that will be used. 2. When procurement is by competitive sealed bidding, the Procurement Officer must use a firm fixed -price contract. Procurement Policy Manual 6 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 124 3. Except when procurement is by competitive sealed bidding as required by law, the Procurement Officer should select the most effective contract type and should consider contract type together with the issues of price, risk, uncertainty, and responsibility for costs. The type of contract used should reflect the cost risk and responsibility assumed by the contractor or supplier. 4. The Procurement Officer should avoid the continued use of a cost reimbursement or time -and -materials contract after experience provides a basis for firmer pricing. 5. The Procurement Officer should include documentation in each contract file to show why the particular contract type was selected, except for purchase orders under the small purchase threshold. C. Fixed -Price Contracts 1. Fixed -price contracts may provide for a firm price or, in appropriate cases, an adjustable price. 2. Fixed -price contracts providing for an adjustable price may include a ceiling price, a target price (including target cost), or both. Unless otherwise specified in the contract, the ceiling price or target price will be subject to adjustment only by operation of contract clauses providing for equitable adjustment or other revision of the contract price under stated circumstances. 3. A firm -fixed -price contract should provide for a price that is not subject to any adjustment on the basis of the contractor's cost experience in performing the contract. 4. A firm -fixed -price contract should be used for acquiring commercial products or commercial -type products, or for acquiring other supplies or services, on the basis of reasonably definite functional or detailed specifications if the Procurement Officer can establish fair and reasonable prices at the outset, including the following circumstances: a. When there is adequate price competition; b. When there are reasonable price comparisons with prior purchases of the same or similar supplies or services made on a competitive basis; c. When available cost or pricing information permits realistic estimates of the probable costs of performance; d. When performance uncertainties can be identified and reasonable estimates of their cost impact can be made, and the contractor is willing to accept a firm -fixed -price contract; or e. When required by law unless a sole source exception applies. D. Cost Reimbursement/Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee Contracts Procurement Policy Manual 7 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 125 1. Cost reimbursement contracts provide for payment of the contractor's reasonable, allocable and allowable incurred costs plus a negotiated fixed fee, to the extent prescribed in the underlying contract and Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 31. 2. A cost reimbursement contract establishes an estimate of total cost for the purpose of obligating funds and establishing a ceiling on expenditures that the contractor may not exceed without the approval of the Commission. 3. Cost reimbursement contracts are suitable for use when the uncertainties of performance do not permit costs to be estimated with sufficient accuracy to use a fixed -price contract. 4. The Commission must determine the adequacy of the contractor's accounting system for cost -type contracts before awarding such a contract. E. Time -And -Materials Contracts 1. A time -and -materials contract should be used only after the Procurement Officer determines: a. In writing, that no other type of contract is suitable; and b. A ceiling price to be included in the contract that the contractor shall not exceed except at its own risk. 2. A time -and -materials contract should be used only when it is not possible at the time of executing the contract to estimate accurately the extent or duration of the work or to anticipate costs with any reasonable degree of certainty or confidence. 3. A time -and -materials contract should include direct labor hours at specified fixed hourly rates that include wages, overhead, general and administrative expenses, profit, and materials required at cost. 4. The user department/project manager should ensure that there is adequate surveillance of contractor performance when a time -and -materials type contract is used. F. Labor -Hour Contracts 1. When materials are not required, the Procurement Officer may use a labor - hour contract, a variation of the time -and -materials contract. 2. The use of a labor -hour contract should be in accordance with the above - referenced provisions related to time -and -materials contracts. Procurement Policy Manual 8 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 126 G. Letter Contracts (Letter Of Intent Contracts) 1. A letter contract is an interim type of contractual agreement that gives the contractor a limited notice of award for the delivery of the required goods/supplies or the performance of services. 2. The Procurement Officer may use a letter contract when the Commission's interests demand that the contractor be given a binding commitment so that work can start immediately and executing a definitive contract is not possible in sufficient time to meet the requirement. Each letter contract should be as complete and definitive as possible under the circumstances and should include clauses approved and required by the Procurement Officer. 3. The estimated cost of the definitive contract should determine the type and level of review and approval required for approval of a letter contract. 4. A letter contract may not be entered into without competition except as provided for under Non -Competitive and/or Emergency Procurements provisions of this Manual. 5. A letter contract may not be amended to satisfy a new requirement unless the new requirement is inseparable from the existing contract. Any amendment should be subject to the same requirements as a new letter contract. 6. The total value of the letter contract should be the estimated sum necessary to cover the contractor's requirement for funds before execution of the definitive contract. However, the total value of a letter contract should not, under any circumstances, exceed fifty percent (50%) of the overall price ceiling for the term of the final negotiated (i.e., definitive) contract. 7. A letter contract should contain a negotiated schedule for execution of the definitive contract, including dates for submission of the contractor's price proposal, cost or pricing data (if required), a date for start of negotiations, and a target for execution of the definitive contract. 8. The letter contract should provide that if the Procurement Officer and the contractor cannot negotiate a definitive contract because of failure to reach agreement regarding price or fee: 1) the Procurement Officer may terminate the letter contract; or 2) if a "contract definitization" clause is included in the letter contract, the Commission may unilaterally require the contractor to continue the work and the Procurement Officer may, with the approval of the Executive Director, determine a reasonable price or fee. H. Multiple Year Contracts Multiple year contracts may be used with competitive sealed bids, competitive proposals, or by non-competitive procurement. The contract term, and any extensions thereof, shall be established based on sound business judgment of the Procurement Policy Manual 9 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 127 Commission. Multiple year contracting is a method by which the Commission awards a contract for a base period of one or more years, with option provisions for future years' requirements. The option provision in the contract should provide for unilateral exercise at the discretion of the user department/project manager, as additional requirements and funding become available. See below under Section 5.0 of this Chapter for further information regarding Options. For federally -funded procurements, the procurement file shall document the rationale for determining the term. Considerations should include the time necessary to accomplish the purpose of the contract, competition, pricing, and fairness. I. Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) Contracts 1. The Procurement Officer may use an ID/IQ type of contract when the Commission anticipates a recurring requirement, but cannot predetermine the precise quantities of supplies or services at the time of contract award. 2. FHWA or Caltrans funded ID/IQ on -call contracts and FTA funded ID/IQ contracts for rolling stock and replacement part contracts may not exceed five (5) years. 2,3. ID/IQ contracts should specify maximum or minimum estimated quantities that the Commission may require during the term of the agreement. An ID/IQ contract should make no promise of exclusivity and may in fact be one of several (multiple) contracts awarded for the same item or service. 3 4. There are several types of ID/IQ contracts, including: a. Definite -quantity contracts b. Requirements contracts c. Indefinite quantity (IQ) contracts (commodities) d. Task order contracts (services) 4.5. If possible under the circumstances, the Procurement Officer should ensure that original solicitation and resultant ID/IQ contract contain both a minimum and a maximum quantities, which represent the reasonably foreseeable needs of the parties to the solicitation, and a clause stating that the estimate is not a representation to a bidder, offeror, or consultant that the estimated quantity or dollar amount above the estimated minimum will actually be required or ordered by the Commission. 576. For task orders contracts, the procurement documents and executed contracts must specify the procedures to be used in awarding task orders. Such procedures must comply with state and federal regulations, as applicable. 5.0 OPTIONS A. General Procurement Policy Manual 10 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 128 1. When it is in the best interest of the Commission, a contract option may be included providing the Commission the unilateral right to extend the term of the contract and/or to purchase additional supplies or services called for by the contract. 2. Any written findings required for a contract option shall specify both the base requirement(s) and the increase permitted by subsequent options. Contract provisions setting forth the cost of the option may include, but are not limited to, the following: a. A specific dollar amount; b. An amount to be determined by applying provisions (or a formula) provided in the basic contract, but not including renegotiation of the price for work in a fixed -price type contract; c. In a cost -type contract, a stated fixed or maximum fee, or a fixed or maximum fee amount determinable by applying a formula contained in the basic contract; d. A specific price that is subject to an economic price adjustment provision; or e. A specific price that is subject to change as a result of changes to the prevailing labor rates provided by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) or the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) prevailing rates, whichever is applicable. B. Solicitation of Contracts with Options 1. If a contract provides for an option, the solicitation should include appropriate option clauses. 2. Each contract should state the period within which an option may be exercised. 3. In order to meet the requirements of this Manual for full and open competition, the option should be evaluated as part of the initial competition and be exercisable at an amount specified from the terms of the basic contract. When options have not been evaluated as part of the award, the exercise of such options will be considered a non-competitive procurement and must comply with the non-competitive procurement policies in described in this Manual. C. Exercise of Options 1. The user department/project manager, in cooperation with the Procurement Officer, should initiate the exercise of an option only after determining the following: a. That sufficient budget authority is available; b. That the requirement covered by the option fulfills an existing Commission need; and Procurement Policy Manual 11 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 129 c. That the exercise of the option will be the most advantageous method of fulfilling the Commission's needs, when price and other factors are considered. 2. The Procurement Officer, after considering price and other factors, should make the determination whether to recommend exercising the option on the basis of one of the following: a. A new solicitation fails to produce a better price or a more advantageous offer than that offered by the option; provided, that if it is anticipated that the best price available is the option price (or that the option provides the more advantageous offer), the Procurement Officer should not use this method to test the market; b. An informal analysis of prices or an examination of the market indicates that the option price is better than prices available in the market or that the option is the most advantageous offer; or c. The short time between the award of the contract containing the option and the exercise of the option indicates that the option price is the lowest price obtainable or the most advantageous. 3. The contract modification or other written document, which notifies the contractor of the exercise of the option, shall cite the option provision as authority for the action and should be issued within the time period specified in the contract. 6.0 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS A. Policy on Intergovernmental or Inter -entity Agreements To promote economy and efficiency, the Commission may enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements or inter -entity agreements, where such agreements are in the best interest of the Commission and are appropriate for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services. The use of purchasing schedules may be prohibited for federally funded procurements. Out- of-state purchasing agreements are prohibited for FTA-funded procurements. B. Memorandum of Understanding A memorandum of understanding (MOU) is a contract document describing a bilateral or multilateral agreement outlining the terms and details of an arrangement between the parties to the MOU, including each party's requirements and responsibilities. An MOU is used when substantial involvement is expected between the Commission and another agency or entity when carrying out the activity contemplated in the MOU, and there exists some public or mutually beneficial purpose in carrying out this activity. C. Piggybacking 1. Piggybacking is the post -award use of an acceptable contract/solicitation process that allows an entity not contemplated in the original procurement to purchase the same supplies or equipment under the original Procurement Policy Manual 12 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 130 contract/solicitation process. 2. Piggybacking is permissible when: a. The underlying solicitation document and the resultant contract contain an assignability clause that provides for the assignment of all or part of the specified deliverables as originally advertised, competed, evaluated, and awarded; and b. For federally funded agreements, the original solicitation and resultant contract contain a minimum and a maximum quantity, which represent the reasonably foreseeable needs of the parties to the solicitation. D. California Multiple Award Schedule and State Master Agreements 1. A California Multiple Award Schedule (CMAS) and State Master Agreements are agreements established between the California Department of General Services (DGS) and multiple vendors who agree to the State of California terms and conditions, and may be used by the Commission. 2. Acquisitions based on CMAS or State Master Agreements shall be competitively bid so as to result in offers from three or more vendors including one small business, if available. If less than three offers are received, documentation of solicitation methods must be included with the contract documentation. 3. Three offers are not required for CMAS and State Master Agreements based on competition, such as Cal -Store, the Master Rental Agreement, Western States Contracting Alliance (WSCA), etc. Information on specific CMAS and State Master Agreements are available on DGS-PD's website at: www.dgs.ca.gov/pd. 4. Notwithstanding PUC section 130232(a), Public Contract Code (PCC) sections 10298(b) and 10299(a) provide authority for the Commission to use CMAS or State Master Agreements for acquiring supplies, equipment and materials that exceed $25,000 without engaging in further competitive bidding. 7.0 RECURRING CONTRACTS A. The Commission may, on an annual basis, evaluate existing contracts for professional services that are due to expire within the next fiscal year. While some of these contracts may be placed on the calendar for a new procurement solicitation or allowed to expire because they are no longer required, notwithstanding any other provision herein, some contracts may be included in an annual recurring contracts list that must be approved by the Commission. Most contracts for professional services should be subject to a competitive process; however, there may be limited circumstances in which staff believes it is more efficient and cost effective to retain such consultants on the recurring contracts list rather than rebidding the services. Those circumstances generally are due to the consultant's historical knowledge, unique experience, and understanding of the Procurement Policy Manual 13 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 131 Commission and/or specific Commission projects. Approval of the recurring contracts list allows the Commission to continue work on existing projects without interruptions and maintain consistency. 1. State or Ffederally-funded contracts may not be included in the annual recurring contracts list. Procurement Policy Manual 14 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 132 CHAPTER 2 — PROCUREMENT GENERALLY 1.0 IMPLEMENTATION BY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR; COMMISSION CONTROLS AND LIMITATIONS A. Final authority for purchasing actions and decisions rests with the Commission, except as delegated by the Commission to the Executive Director. B. The Commission authorizes the Executive Director to execute contracts approved by the Commission. The Executive Director may designate the Deputy Executive Director, Chief Financial Officer or Directors to execute contracts under his or her signature authority on his/her behalf. C. The policies set forth herein will be implemented by the Chief Financial Officer. The Chief Financial Officer has primary responsibility for ensuring that the Commission's procurement process is in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, as interpreted by the General Counsel and Commission policy. D. The Executive Director is authorized to approve and enter into contracts on behalf of the Commission under his/her single signature authority as follows: 1. When the expenditure is less than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) for the purchase of all supplies, equipment, materials and for the construction of all facilities and works in accordance with PUC § 130232; and 2. When the expenditure is less than one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) for the purchase of services; however, (i) the aggregate amount of contracts executed under the single signature authority shall not exceed $1,500,000 in any given fiscal year; (ii) the aggregate value of all contracts awarded to any one entity under the Executive Director's single signature authority shall not exceed $150,000 in any fiscal year; and (iii) the Executive Director may execute contract amendments for existing contracts that do not exceed $150,000. Such authority however, may not be exercised more than once during the life of any contract and may not be used to amend contracts originally executed under the Executive Director's single signature authority. The Commission's fiscal year is from July 1 to June 30. E. The powers of the Executive Director pursuant to Paragraph "D" above are subject to: (i) the existence and provisions of a Commission approved budget; and (ii) applicable laws and regulations. F. The Executive Director must provide the Commission with a regular report of all contracts entered into pursuant to the single signature authority provided in Paragraph "D" above, and must report to the Commission at its next regularly scheduled meeting each new contract awarded on an emergency basis or other contracts in excess of the Executive Director's single signature authority. Procurement Policy Manual 15 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 133 G. Approval Limits and Solicitation Types 1. Supplies, Equipment, and Materials (PUC § 130232). PURCHASE AMOUNT SOLICITATION TYPE SOLICITATION PROCESS APPROVER Less than $1,000 Micro -purchase Informal: Commercial availability, Procurement Officer* Rotate Vendors $1,000 to $25,000 Small Purchase Informal: Three (3) Quotes Procurement Officer* $25,001 to $50,000 Formal Procurement Formal: Advertisement, Clauses, Executive Director Competitive Sealed Bids Greater than $50,000 Formal Procurement Formal: Advertisement, Clauses, Commission Competitive Sealed Bids 2. Public Works (PUC § 130232). PURCHASE AMOUNT SOLICITATION TYPE SOLICITATION PROCESS APPROVER Less than $1,000 Micro -purchase Informal: Commercial availability, Procurement Officer * Rotate Vendors, Non -Collusion Declaration, Insurance $1,000 to $25,000 Small Purchase Informal: Three (3) Quotes, Procurement Officer* Prevailing Wage, Clauses, Insurance, License, Non -Collusion Declaration $25,001 to $50,000 Formal Procurement Formal: Advertisement, Clauses, Executive Director Prevailing Wage, Insurance, License, Competitive Sealed Bids, Payment Bond, Non -Collusion Declaration Greater than $50,000 Formal Procurement Formal: Advertisement, Clauses, Commission Prevailing Wage, Insurance, License, Competitive Sealed Bids, Payment Bond, Non -Collusion Declaration * As delegated by the Executive Director Procurement Policy Manual 16 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 134 3. Services. PURCHASE AMOUNT SOLICITATION TYPE SOLICITATION PROCESS APPROVER Less than $3,500 Micro -purchase Informal: Commercial availability, Procurement Officer* Rotate Vendors, Insurance $3,500 to $50,000 Small Purchase Informal: Three (3) Quotes, Clauses, Procurement Officer* Insurance $50,001 to $150,000 Small Purchase Informal: Three (3) Quotes, Clauses, Executive Director Insurance; or Formal: Advertisement, Clauses, Insurance, and Negotiated Agreement, or Competitive Sealed Bids, or A/E Contract procedures Greater than $150,000 Formal Procurement Formal: Advertisement, Clauses, Commission Insurance, Certifications, and Negotiated Agreement, or Competitive Sealed Bids, or A/E Contract procedures * As delegated by the Executive Director H. In addition to the authority granted above, and except as otherwise prohibited by applicable state or federal law, the Executive Director is authorized to approve and enter into contracts on behalf of the Commission, where the relevant contract is directly related to and necessary to implement a project that has been approved by the Commission, the contract is within the approved project budget and, based on the circumstances, exercise of this authority is in the best interest of the Commission. 2.0 PROCUREMENT OFFICER —DESIGNATION AND DELEGATION A. The Chief Financial Officer is the designated "Procurement Officer" for the Commission. The Chief Financial Officer may delegate all or part of the Procurement Officer duties described in this Manual. 3.0 PROCUREMENT OFFICER —DUTIES A. The Procurement Officer has the duty to oversee all procurement activities of the Commission, and to implement the policies and standards set forth in this Manual, subject to the limitations of the authority that has been delegated to the Procurement Officer by the Commission or the Executive Director. B. The Procurement Officer may issue instructions for the implementation of Commission procurement policies. C. The Procurement Officer has the duty to ensure Commission contracts, purchase orders, modifications, and supplemental agreements are executed in accordance with established thresholds and delegated authority. Procurement Policy Manual 17 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 135 D. The Procurement Officer, subject to the review of the Commission's General Counsel, has the authority to draft and determine the final form of the contract to be used for each procurement. E. The Procurement Officer should ensure that a complete record of each procurement action is maintained in accordance with the Commission's records retention policy by establishing files containing the records of all major procurements and contractual actions pertinent to that office's responsibilities. 1. The Procurement Officer is responsible for maintaining the original contract file pursuant to applicable state and/or federal records retention policies. 2. The documentation in each contract file maintained by the Procurement Officer should be sufficient to constitute a complete history of the transaction for the following purposes: a. Providing a complete background as a basis for informed decisions at each step of the procurement process; b. Supporting actions taken; c. Providing information for reviews, audits, and investigations; and d. Furnishing essential facts in the event of litigation. F. The Procurement Officer has the duty to ensure Commission staff engaged in procurement activities are trained in the procurement requirements set forth in this Manual. 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION OF PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES A. The Procurement Officer, in his or her discretion and subject to the review and concurrence of the Commission's General Counsel, may adopt procurement and materials management procedures and guidelines needed to implement and supplement the policies and standards set forth in this Manual. Any such procedures and guidelines shall: 1. Provide for timely review and processing of all procurement actions; 2. Ensure that procurements proceed timely, efficiently and economically; 3. Ensure that procurements adhere to principles of good public policy practices and sound business judgment; and 4. Prohibit arbitrary actions. An example of an arbitrary action is the award of a construction contract, using the competitive sealed bids method of procurement, to a bidder other than the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. 5.0 AUTHORIZED METHODS OF PROCUREMENT; SELECTION A. Selection Procurement Policy Manual 18 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 136 As part of the procurement initiation process, the Procurement Officer will determine which method of procurement is appropriate. B. Authorized Methods The following methods of procurement may be used, as appropriate, in accordance with the policies and procedures included in the Procurement Manual for all federal and non-federal procurement actions contemplated under this Procurement Manual: 1. Micro Purchase Procedures, pursuant to Chapter 6 of this Manual; 2. Small Purchase Procedures, pursuant to Chapter 6 of this Manual; 3. Competitive Sealed Bid ("Low Bid"), pursuant to Chapter 3 of this Manual; 4. Competitively Negotiated Procurement, pursuant to Chapter 5 of this Manual; 5. Non -Competitive and Emergency Procurement, pursuant to Chapter 7 of this Manual; and 6. Alternate Delivery, pursuant to Chapter 4 of this Manual. 6.0 INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE A. An independent cost estimate is a determination of price reasonableness. An estimate shall be completed prior to the receipt of bids or proposals. Key elements of the independent cost estimate include, but are not limited to: 1. Date of the independent cost estimate; 2. Basis for the independent cost estimate, including applicable supporting documentation; and 3. The value determined by the independent cost estimate. B. The method and means of establishing the estimate may vary based on the circumstances and can range from checking historical records or published price guides to a detailed estimate in the same level of detail that is required for contractors submitting proposals. Estimates can be obtained from a design firm or in-house technical personnel for construction work or from independent third - party staff (not impacted by final procurement). C. The estimate provides the Procurement Officer with essential input during the solicitation process. Independent cost estimates may be used by the Commission to: 1. Provide a determination of value (i.e., do benefits warrant the cost); 2. Support procurement planning; 3. Determine the appropriate solicitation type and process based on the approval limits set forth in Chapter 2, 1.0(G); 4. Establish the competitive range and supplement the evaluation process; Procurement Policy Manual 19 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 137 5. Provide a basis for a price analysis, which may eliminate the need for a more burdensome cost analysis; 6. Provide a basis for development of a pre -negotiation objective; 7. Support the Commission's negotiation position with contractor; and/or 8. After contract award, provide essential input with respect to contract amendments, change orders and claims. 7.0 COST/PRICE ANALYSIS A. A cost/price analysis shall be performed in connection with every federally funded procurement action, including contract modifications, and should be conducted for non -federally funded procurements. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation. B. If the contract being awarded is a cost -reimbursement type, the cost/price analysis shall address the realism of the various cost elements proposed, and where the costs are unrealistically low, an adjustment shall be made to reflect what the Commission believes the effort will actually cost given that offeror's specific technical approach as well as its direct and indirect cost rates. 1. The Commission shall, when applicable, or must, if required by law, utilize the guidelines provided in the FAR Part 31 to determine whether of the contractor's proposed costs are reasonable, allowable and allocable. C. As applicable, the Commission shall negotiate profit as a separate element of the price for each contract in which there is no price competition and in all applicable cases where cost analysis is performed. To establish a fair and reasonable profit, consideration must be given to the complexity of the work to be performed, the risk borne by the contractor, the contractor's investment, the amount of subcontracting, the quality of its record of past performance, and industry profit rates in the surrounding geographical area for similar work. 8.0 VENDOR CONTACTS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A SOLICITATION A. Informational and market research contacts with prospective contractors/vendors should be circumscribed based upon legitimate, identifiable business purposes and guided by the exercise of sound judgment. The primary pitfalls to be avoided are promises or implications from Commission staff of a future contract, development by a vendor of a specification or scope of services to be used as part of a Commission solicitation that vendor intends to participate in, requests from Commission staff for complimentary services or supplies, and other activities that may create a real or apparent conflict of interest or the impression of an obligation on the part of the Commission. Procurement Policy Manual 20 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 138 9.0 ADVERTISING/PUBLICIZING PROCUREMENTS A. The Procurement Officer should use the most efficient and effective means to publicize contract actions to increase competition in accordance with the requirements of the specific procurement. B. PUC § 130232, applicable to the purchase of all supplies, equipment, materials and for the construction of all facilities and works when the expenditure exceeds twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000), requires that notice requesting bids shall be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation. The publication must be made at least 10 days before the date for the receipt of the bids. The Commission, at its discretion, may reject any and all bids and re -advertise. C. PUC § 130238 for the purchase of computers, telecommunications equipment, microwave equipment, and other related electronic equipment and apparatus that is not available in substantial quantities to the general public requires (i) the procurement be conducted through competitive negotiation, after a finding by the Commission by a two-thirds vote that this particular procurement qualifies under PUC § 130238, and (ii) notice of the request for proposals be published at least twice in a newspaper of general circulation, at least 10 days before the date for receipt of the proposals. D. Federal Transit Administration Section 9.c of FTA Circular 4220.1F requires that invitations for bids are to be "publicly" advertised, and Section 9.d of FTA Circular 4220.1F requires that requests for proposals are to be publicized. E. Caltrans and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Chapter 15, paragraph 15.43 Project Advertisement, of the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual provides detailed guidance regarding advertising of FHWA- and/or Caltrans-funded projects. F. Pre -solicitation advertising prescribed in this section is not required for non- competitive, sole source, or emergency procurements processed in accordance with this Manual. 10.0 NON-DISCRIMINATION IN PROCUREMENT A. All formal contracts entered into by the Commission should contain appropriate clauses prohibiting discrimination by the contractor against any person or group of persons on account of race, color, religion, creed, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, age, marital status, sex or sexual orientation in the performance of the contract. 11.0 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST A. An unfair competitive advantage could result if a contractor were allowed to submit a bid or proposal for work described in a specification or statement of work that the contractor itself developed. For the purpose of eliminating a potential unfair competitive advantage, and in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and regulations, a contractor that develops or assists in Procurement Policy Manual 21 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 139 developing specifications, requirements, statements of work, invitation for bids, and/or request for proposals for a Commission procurement is excluded from competing for the resultant procurement, unless an appropriate waiver is issued by the Commission. All waivers will be assessed by the Commission on a case -by - case basis. 12.0 DUTIES OF COMMISSION STAFF REGARDING PROCUREMENTS A. General Procuring goods, services, and contracts for the Commission must be a cooperative effort, and it will be the responsibility of all Commission staff involved in procurement to employ sound business judgment and appropriate standards of ethics and fairness to procure goods and services in a manner most advantageous to the Commission. All employees and departments are instructed to follow the procedures set forth in the Manual, as well as any instructions issued by the Procurement Officer regarding procurements. 1. For FTA-funded procurements, the user department should consider use of the FTA checklists provided in FTA Circular 4220.1 F, Appendix C, which address, among other things, undue restrictions on competition, when use of brand name or equal is permitted, and other FTA requirements and limitations. 2. For FHWA and Caltrans-funded procurements, the user department shall ould consider use of the Caltrans' Local Assistance Procedures Manual for guidance and shallould ensure that appropriate Commission procurement and contract forms for the relevant funding source are used. B. In order to initiate a procurement action (including amendments, procurements, exercising of available options, etc.), the user department/project manager should, at a minimum, provide the Procurement Officer with the following items, as applicable: 1. Specification, Scope of Services, or Statement of Work. For a new procurement, a complete and clearly written specification, purchase description, or statement of work suitable for either competition or for negotiation with a sole source contractor, if justified. For competitive procurements, the description must not (for federally funded procurements) and should not (for non -federally funded procurements) contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. For federally funded procurements, detailed product specifications should be avoided. When it is impractical or uneconomical to make a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements, a "brand name or equivalent" description may be used as a means to define the performance or other salient requirements of procurement. The specific features of the named brand which must be Procurement Policy Manual 22 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 140 met by offerors must (for federally funded procurements) and should (for non -federally funded procurements) be clearly stated. 2. Changes. Changes to existing contracts, including amendments and construction change orders, must be documented pursuant to a written amendment or written construction change order, as applicable, executed by the appropriate parties, and should comply with the following. a. Amendments If a contract amendment has been negotiated based upon an existing advanced pricing arrangement or labor rates/categories included in the underlying agreement, the user department/project manager should provide the Procurement Officer with a copy of the final negotiated scope of services for the extra work, associated pricing terms, and/or schedule. b. Construction Change Orders Construction change orders should follow the procedures established by the Capital Projects Department and applicable contract specifications. Documentation of the change order does not need to be provided to the Procurement Officer, but should be maintained by the user department/project manager as specified herein. If a construction change order has been negotiated based upon an existing advanced pricing arrangement or labor rates/categories included in the underlying agreement, the user department/project manager should maintain a record of the change order and supporting documentation in the project files including an independent cost estimate and cost and/or price analysis, as applicable. i. Any change order must be administered in accordance with its terms, and appropriate documentation must be generated and maintained supporting payment in accordance with state or federal requirements, as applicable. ii. All change orders must be signed by a Commission employee who is a registered civil engineer. iii. Any change order in excess of $100,000 also requires approval by the Executive Director. iv. Any change order that will increase the total contract value to an amount that exceeds the contractual authority approved by the Commission may not be executed until additional contractual authority has been obtained through the Commission. v. The Capital Projects Director is responsible for determining that change orders are processed and approved in accordance with departmental and contractual requirements. Procurement Policy Manual 23 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 141 c. Changes to Federally Funded Contracts For federally funded contracts, findings must be included in the project file that the change is in the general scope of the original contract. A significant change in contract work that causes a major deviation from the original purpose of the work or the intended method of achievement, or causes a revision of contract work so extensive, significant, or cumulative that, in effect the contractor is required to perform very different work from that described in the original contract, is considered a "cardinal change" or "tag -on" contract, and is not permitted unless it meets the requirements of Chapter 8, Section 3.0. 3. Agreement Summary Sheet. The user department/project manager must provide a complete and executed Agreement Summary Sheet for all procurement actions, including applicable small purchases, formal procurements, MOUs, agreements, change order modifications and the like. The Agreement Summary Sheet identifies the nature of funding for the subject goods/services, provides a record that the requirement was budgeted and properly approved before the procurement process began, and ensures that the procurement action is assigned a unique agreement number for purposes of contract administration, payment, and recordkeeping. 4. Cost Estimate. The user department/project manager shall provide the Procurement Officer with a cost estimate for the anticipated procurement of goods/services. See paragraph 6.0 above for additional guidance regarding the development of an independent cost estimate. 5. Justification for Sole Source/Non-competitive Procurement (if applicable). The user department/project manager must prepare and submit to the Procurement Officer a written statement recording all the facts that provide justification for avoiding mandated competitive procurement practices explicitly defined in this Manual and/or required by relevant state and federal law in favor of a non-competitive/sole source award. The Procurement Officer must approve the sole source procurement methodology before the procurement can proceed. If the procurement is funded with state or federal funds, the appropriate findings required by the applicable funding entity must be made. For Caltrans or FHWA funded contracts, a Public Interest Finding (PIF) must be approved by the appropriate funding entity. 13.0 INSURANCE A. Contractors providing goods and services should be required to carry sufficient insurance to protect the Commission from third party lawsuits for personal injury (including death) and property damage. Insurance may also be required for damage to Commission property and for errors and omissions in the provision of professional services. Procurement Policy Manual 24 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 142 B. The following types of procurement actions should be reviewed by the Procurement Officer for appropriate levels, types and limits of coverage on a case -by -case basis: 1. All operations and non -operational construction contracts. 2. All professional services contracts. 3. All contracts where work will be performed within "50 feet" of railroad. 4. All environmental contracts, including engineering services. 5. All procurement contracts and/or purchase agreements where outside vendors will be conducting work or performing installation services on Commission premises. 6. All procurement contracts and/or purchase agreements where outside vendors will be delivering products to a Commission facility. C. The contract documents should ensure that Commission contractors will be required to comply with insurance requirements imposed by state and local governments. D. At a minimum, the contract documents should require the contractor and subcontractor to carry general liability, workmen's compensation, and automobile insurance coverages for public works contracts. E. In certain limited cases, the Procurement Officer may permit the contractor to substitute an approved program of self-insurance in order to obtain such approval. The contractor will have to demonstrate that it can sustain the potential losses being self -insured. F. The Procurement Officer should include insurance and indemnification provisions in equipment, supply, and services contracts in accordance with Commission policies described herein. 14.0 SUBCONTRACTING A. The Commission may consider requiring a prime contractor to perform certain tasks or a minimum percentage of the work, in order to ensure that the prime contractor maintains a specified degree of control over the project. B. Approval of contractor proposed subcontractors usually involves an evaluation of three primary areas: 1. Assurance that the prime contractor has included the required "flow - down" provisions (clauses) from the prime contract in the subcontract. 2. The prime contractor's compliance with the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) requirements in its prime contract. 3. Assurance that the prime contractor has selected its critical subcontractors in a prudent fashion, so as to protect the Commission's interests. Procurement Policy Manual 25 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 143 15.0. DETERMINATION OF FAIR AND REASONABLE PRICE A. The Procurement Officer should determine, in writing, that the price to be paid to the successful offeror is fair and reasonable. Typically, adequate price competition is sufficient to establish price reasonableness; however, price reasonableness may also be established through: 1. Prices established by law or regulation; 2. Published catalog or market price for commercial product sold to the public in substantial quantities; 3. Previous or relevant historical pricing for same or similar terms; 4. Valid cost estimate; 5. Value analysis; or 6. Cost/price analysis. B. Single Offer/Lack of Adequate Competition 1. Upon receiving a single bid or single proposal in response to a solicitation, the Procurement Officer should determine if competition was adequate. a. Such determination should include a review of the specifications for undue restrictiveness and may include a survey of potential sources that chose not to submit a bid or proposal. b. If the results of the review are that the scope of work was so restrictive that only one firm could have responded, then there is a lack of competition. The Procurement Officer should (1) cancel and re - procure the solicitation or (2) treat the solicitation as a sole source procurement, if it meets the requirements of Chapter 7 of this Manual. c. If the results of the review are that the scope of work was not restrictive and more than one firm could have responded, then there is adequate competition. The Procurement Officer may recommend an award of the agreement to the single offeror, as determined by the Commission, in accordance with this Manual and in accordance with applicable legal requirements. 2. When the price variance between multiple responses reflects a lack of adequate competition, the Procurement Officer may re -solicit quotes or, if appropriate, recommend an award of the agreement to the lowest or best offeror, as determined by the Commission, in accordance with this Manual and in accordance with applicable legal requirements. 3. A recommendation for award under either of the above circumstances should include a statement in the contract file giving the basis for the determination (e.g., that there was adequate competition and/or the pricing terms are fair and reasonable). Procurement Policy Manual 26 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 144 16.0 CONTRACT APPROVAL, AWARD, AND EXECUTION A. Following authorization for contract award by the Commission, the following actions should be taken: 1. The Procurement Officer requests all Commission required documents and contract contingency requirement (e.g., bonds, proof of insurance) from the successful contractor. 2. The Procurement Officer conforms and sends copies of the final contract or amendment to the contractor for signature, and obtains the appropriate Commission authorization by ensuring full execution of the contract. 3. After full execution of the contract and the contractor's submittal of the required contract contingency items, unless otherwise agreed, the Procurement Officer coordinates with the user department/project manager to prepare a "Notice to Proceed" letter, if required. 4. The Procurement Officer transmits a fully executed original copy of the contract to the contractor. Conformed copies should be sent to the project manager for use in the administration of the contract. 5. Contract Administration Responsibilities a. The user department/project manager conducts all further coordination on technical issues between the contractor and the Commission, subsequent to the issuance of the "Notice to Proceed" letter. b. Issues affecting the business or legal terms in the contract and/or requests for modification or supplemental agreements to the contract should immediately be brought to the attention of the Procurement Officer. c. The contract and all documents pertaining thereto should be maintained by the Procurement Officer, except for construction change orders which will be maintained by the project management team. 17.0 PROTEST PROCEDURES A. Under formal procurement processes described under this Manual, an interested party that has timely submitted a bid or proposal in response to any procurement of the Commission may file a protest objecting to the award of a contract. B. In order for a protest to be considered properly and timely filed, the protest must: 1. Be filed in writing with the Executive Director of the Commission, within seven (7) calendar days after (i) all requests for clarifications and requests for approved equals have been answered by the Commission or, if no requests for clarification or approved equals are received, after the period for requests for clarifications or approved equals has closed; (ii) after the Commission takes action, or such other time period as may be specified in the solicitation document; or (iii) the date certain contained in the solicitation for any solicitation for which a contract award is not made by the Commission. Procurement Policy Manual 27 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 145 2. Be filed by an actual bidder or proposer responding to the procurement and signed by a properly authorized representative. No other party has standing to protest or is considered an interested party. 3. Identify the specific procurement number involved. 4. Identify the specific recommended action or decision being protested. 5. Specify in detail the grounds for the protest, the facts supporting the protest and the status of the protester. 6. Include all relevant supporting documentation with the protest at the time of submittal. 7. Describe the resolution to the protest desired by the protesting party. If a protest does not comply with each of the seven (7) requirements listed above, the protest will not be considered and will be returned to the protester. C. The Procurement Officer will attempt to resolve a properly filed protest or perform additional fact-finding, including establishing a protest evaluation team to evaluate the merits of the protest. The Procurement Officer, in consultation with the Commission's General Counsel, will prepare a recommended resolution of the protest for consideration by the Executive Director. The Executive Director will review the recommendation of the evaluation team and will render a determination to uphold or deny the protest. D. If the Executive Director's decision is to deny the protest, the solicitation may be continued without further delay or the contract will be recommended to the Commission for award, or executed, if previously awarded by the Commission subject to resolution of the protest. If the Executive Director's decision is to uphold the protest, a recommendation will be made to the Commission to amend the solicitation and the date for receipt of proposals or bids, reject all proposals or bids, cancel the request for proposals or invitation for bids and solicit new proposals or bids, award the contract to another proposer, or other such actions as he/she deems appropriate. E. The Executive Director's decision shall be final, and there shall be no further administrative recourse at the local level, except for protests related to federally funded procurements. F. The procedures set forth in this Chapter 2, Section 17.0 are not intended to reduce or restrict protest rights specifically provided under applicable funding agreements, or state or federal laws authorizing the use of money funding applicable contracts. 1. In any procurement involving FTA funds, the Procurement Officer shall disclose information regarding the protest to FTA and shall keep FTA informed about the status of the protest. 2. An interested party that has filed a protest must exhaust all administrative remedies with the Commission before pursuing a protest with FTA. Procurement Policy Manual 28 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 146 G. A debrief will be available for proposers to whom award was not made, for a period of ten (10) days following award of the contract by the Commission. 18.0 PUBLIC RECORDS REQUESTS A. All requests for procurement related records and/or information must be submitted to the Clerk of the Board_for appropriate action. Procurement related records should not be disclosed as public information until staff recommendation for award has been forwarded to all interested parties or as otherwise appropriate under the California Public Records Act and applicable state and federal laws, guidelines and requirements. Procurement Policy Manual 29 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 147 148 CHAPTER 3 - COMPETITIVE SEALED BIDS ("LOW BID") A. PUC § 130232 requires that the purchase of all supplies, equipment, and materials, and the construction of all facilities and works, when the expenditure required exceeds twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000), must be by competitive sealed bidding, also known as "low bid", contracting, with the contract let to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. Notice requesting bids must be published in at least one newspaper of general circulation. The publication must be made at least ten (10) days before the date for receipt of bids; however, based on the nature of the procurement, a longer period of time shall be provided, as necessary, to ensure that bidders are allowed adequate and sufficient time to prepare bids before the date of bid opening. The resulting contract will be a fixed price contract. B. In order for competitive sealed bidding to be most effective, the following conditions should be present in the development of an Invitation for Bids (IFB): 1. A complete, adequate and sufficiently generic specification is developed; 2. Adequate competition is available in the marketplace (two or more responsive and responsible bidders will compete); and 3. The procurement lends itself to a firm -fixed price contract. C. Discussions and Communications 1. Bids shall be evaluated without discussions with bidders. 2. Information concerning proposed procurements should not be released outside the Commission before an IFB is released, except for pre - solicitation notices and publicly available general project information. D. Pre -Bid Conferences 1. The Contracting Officer may use pre -bid conferences to explain procurement requirements. 2. If the Commission requires any type of mandatory pre -bid conference, site visit, or meeting, the IFB should include the time, date, and location of the mandatory pre -bid site visit, conference or meeting, and when and where project documents, including final plans and specifications are available. Any mandatory pre -bid site visit, conference or meeting should be no sooner than a minimum of five (5) calendar days following the publication of the IFB. E. Bid Addenda 1. If it becomes necessary to make changes in quantity, specifications, delivery schedules, opening dates, or other items, or to correct a defective or ambiguous IFB, the change should be accomplished by addendum of the IFB. 2. Addenda to an IFB should be identified as such and should require the bidder to acknowledge receipt of all addenda issued. Procurement Policy Manual 30 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 149 F. Time Of Bid Receipt The IFB should specify a time for receipt of bids. Bids must be received in the office designated in the IFB not later than the time identified in the IFB. G. Late Bids Unless otherwise specified in a particular bid solicitation, bids are considered late based on the time clock at the 3rd floor Commission Receptionist Desk, located at 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501. Bids are considered late if the time stamped by the Commission upon receipt of the bid is later than the deadline/time identified in the IFB. Late bids will not be accepted by the Commission, unless a bid is late owing solely to Commission mishandling or some other legitimate extenuating factor, as determined in the Commission's sole discretion. H. Receipt Of Bids As bids are received, the Procurement Officer should secure and safeguard the bids until the established time for bid opening. I. Opening Of Bids The Procurement Officer will coordinate the bid opening. All bids over $25,000 for supplies, equipment, and materials and the construction of all facilities and works received prior to the bid submission deadline will be publicly opened, read aloud to the persons present, and recorded. Bid opening documentation should include the date, time, and place of bid opening and a tabulation of bidder names and related bid amount. Such bid opening documentation should include the signature of at least one witness. J. Recording Of Bids Construction bids over the small purchase threshold of $25,000 that are publicly opened will be recorded on a bid summary or bid tabulation sheet. The Procurement Officer should certify the accuracy of the bid summary sheet by placing his/her signature thereon. The Commission's Procurement Officer should ensure that these results are posted on the Commission interne site within a reasonable time after bid opening. K. Tie Bids If two or more responsible and responsive bids are received for the same total or unit price, quality and service being equal, the Commission shall establish a date and time to draw lots, which shall be accomplished by tossing a coin or pulling bidder names out of a hat, to determine the winner. Using the lottery method, the Commission shall: 1. Advise the tied bidders in writing that a tie has occurred, advise them a winner will be determined by drawing lots, and invite them to attend the drawing. 2. Conduct the drawing of lots on the date and time previously established with at least two individuals as witnesses. The procurement file should reflect the names, titles, and departments of the witnesses. If the witnesses Procurement Policy Manual 31 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 150 are not Commission staff, the name, organization, address, and telephone number of the individuals should be listed. 3. Declare the winner of the drawing of lots as the apparent low bidder for bid evaluation and award purposes. L. Alternative Sources of Procurement Authority Notwithstanding the requirements of PUC § 130232, and the provisions set forth in this Chapter, the Commission may use Cooperative Agreements (as described in Chapter 1, Section 6.0) where such use is otherwise permitted by law. Procurement Policy Manual 32 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 151 152 CHAPTER 4 - ALTERNATE DELIVERY CONTRACTS 1.0 PURPOSE A. For the purposes of this Chapter, "Design -Build" means a method of procuring design and construction from a single source. The selection of the single source occurs before the development of complete plans and specifications. For the purposes of this Chapter, "CM/GC" means a project delivery method in which a construction manager is procured to provide preconstruction services during the design phase of the project and construction services during the construction phase of the project. The structure of the contract for such services is within the discretion of the Commission. For the purposes of this Chapter, "Alternate Delivery Method" means Design - Build, CM/GC or any other alternate method of project procurement or delivery which the Commission is authorized by law to utilize. B. As set forth in PCC Section 6820, et. seq., the Commission is authorized to utilize Design -Build for projects on or adjacent to the state highway system, including related non -highway portions of the project, based on either best value or lowest responsible bid. C. As set forth in PCC Section 6700, et. seq., the Commission is authorized to utilize the Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) method, contingent upon delegation of authority by Caltrans, for two highway projects in Riverside County. D. As set forth in AB 115 (Chapter 20, Statutes of 2017), the Commission is authorized to utilize CM/GC for the 91 Toll Connector to Interstate 15 North proj ect. E. As set forth in PCC Section 6700, et. seq., the Commission is authorized to utilize CM/GC method for certain expressways that are not on the state highway system, provided that the required findings are made, consistent with PCC Section 6701, and the Commission adopts the CM/GC method. F. As set forth in AB 115 (Chapter 20, Statutes of 2017), the Commission is authorized to amend or change any existing contract for the Interstate 15 express lanes construction project or the State Highway Route 91 express lanes to include work or services on the 91 Toll Connector to Interstate 15 North project, if the Commission, with the concurrence of Caltrans, finds that to be a cost-effective method to accelerate the delivery of that project. 2.0 PROCEDURES FOR ALTERNATE DELIVERY CONTRACTS A. The Executive Director may adopt any lawful methods, procedures and criteria that he or she determines are in the best interest of the Commission. Procurement Policy Manual 33 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 153 B. The Toll Program Director, through coordination with the Procurement Officer, will prepare documents for the solicitation of proposals for highway -related Alternate Delivery procurements. C. Where an Alternate Delivery Method does not require a solicitation of proposals, the Toll Program Director shall, through coordination with the Procurement Officer, prepare the contract documents for such procurement. D. The documents prepared for Alternate Delivery procurements shall control over any conflicting provisions contained herein. E. The Commission shall use a procurement method permitted by law and appropriate for the elements of the services (design v. construction) representing the preponderance of work and having the greatest cost, even though other necessary services would not typically be procured by that method. For example, the construction costs of a Design -Build project are usually predominant, so the Commission would use competitive negotiations or sealed bids for the entire procurement rather than the qualification -based "Brooks Act" procurement procedures. 1. The use of the Design -Build procurement method for FTA-funded projects shall comply with FTA Circular 4220.1F, Section VL3.h. 2. The use of the Design -Build procurement method for FHWA-funded projects shall comply, as applicable, with any requirements specified by Caltrans in the relevant project agreements. Procurement Policy Manual 34 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 154 CHAPTER 5 - COMPETITIVELY NEGOTIATED PROCUREMENTS 1.0 NEGOTIATED PROCUREMENTS —GENERAL A. This Chapter outlines the Commission's procedures for competitively negotiated procurements for contracts: 1. Not legally required to be procured through the low -bid competitive procurement method pursuant to PUC § 130232; and 2. Intended to be awarded on the basis of both price and non -price factors. B. A procurement is "negotiated" if discussions, negotiations, or other exchanges between the Commission and the offerors are anticipated and planned in order to maximize the Commission's ability to communicate, understand, and obtain the best value for contract award. 1. The exchanges involve bargaining, persuasion, alteration of assumptions and positions, and give-and-take applied to price, schedule, technical requirements, type of contract, and other proposed terms. 2. The exchanges after establishment of the competitive range of price and terms are done with the intent of allowing the offeror to revise its proposal, once and potentially several times. C. Though not an all-inclusive listing, competitively negotiated procurements can be used for the following types of procurements: 1. Professional services contracts for non -architect -engineer related services; miscellaneous service contracts; 2. Architect -Engineer and related services contracts as further defined and subject to the limitations specified in Section 6.0 of this Chapter; 3. Specialized equipment, computers, telecommunications equipment, microwave equipment and other related electronic equipment and apparatus; or 4. Best Value, Alternate Delivery contracts described in Chapter 4. 2.0 SOURCE SELECTION TECHNIQUES A. The Procurement Officer can choose from a range of source selection techniques for the competitively negotiated process based on: 1. What is suitable for the specific circumstances of a requirement, and 2. Which technique provides the best opportunity to tradeoff price/cost and qualitative benefits in order to gain the best value for the Commission. B. In acquisitions where the requirement is clearly definable and the risk of unsuccessful contract performance is minimal, and excluding contracts for Architect -Engineer and related services, cost or price may play a dominant role as a significantly important evaluation factor for award. Procurement Policy Manual 35 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 155 C. On the other hand, the less definitive the requirement, a requirement for technical superiority, more development work required, or the greater the performance risk, then the technical or past performance considerations play a more dominant role as significantly important evaluation factors for award. D. The Commission obtains best value in negotiated acquisitions by using any one or a combination of selection approaches wherein the relative importance of cost or price may vary with other non -cost or price factor(s). The Procurement Officer and user department/project manager shall select an approach that will provide the Commission with the best offer based on the requirements, and on applicable legal requirements. E. All evaluation factors associated with a particular proposal shall be identified along with their relative importance. The Procurement Officer, in cooperation with the user department/project manager, may utilize explicit factors, price performance trade off, technically qualified/lowest price or other reasonable and appropriate means of evaluating proposers. F. Proposals will be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources. In determining sources to solicit, the Procurement Officer should use all reasonable means available to ensure that an adequate number of potential qualified proposers receive the solicitation in order to obtain maximum fair and open competition. 3.0 PROPOSAL EVALUATION A. The evaluation factors that will be considered in evaluating proposals shall be tailored to each procurement and shall include only those factors that will have an impact on the source selection decision. The evaluation factors that apply to a particular procurement and the relative importance of those factors are within the broad discretion of the Procurement Officer and/or the user department/project manager. B. The Procurement Officer shall establish a formal evaluation committee, of at least two persons, referred to as the "Evaluation Committee." The size of an evaluation committee should be (1) based on the size and complexity of the goods or services being procured and (2) well balanced and represented by individuals involved with the procurement and/or affected by the goods or services being procured. The Evaluation Committee will be charged with responsibility for evaluating proposals, short listing firms, establishing a competitive range, and/or recommending a firm or firms for contract award. 1. Personnel engaged in the evaluation process shall not discuss or reveal information concerning the evaluations except to those individuals participating in the same proceedings and only to the extent that information is required in connection with such proceedings. 2. Divulging information during the evaluation, selection, and negotiation phases to offerors or to personnel not having a need to know is prohibited as it could jeopardize the evaluation process and resultant award. Procurement Policy Manual 36 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 156 C. The Evaluation Committee will evaluate each proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria in the solicitation. The Evaluation Committee's selection decision is subject to the final approval of the Commission or the Executive Director, as required under this Manual. 4.0 REJECTION OF PROPOSALS A. The Evaluation Committee may reject all proposals received that are determined not to be in the competitive range, including those proposals made by offerors who refuse to execute any reasonably required representations and/or certifications. B. The Executive Director may, in his or her discretion, do any of the following (i) reject any or all proposals received, (ii) cancel the procurement process, and/or (iii) direct commencement of a new procurement process for the same services because: 1. All otherwise acceptable proposals received are at unreasonable prices; 2. The proposals were not independently arrived at in open competition, were collusive or were submitted in bad faith; or 3. For other reasons, rejection is clearly in the Commission's best interest. 5.0 NEGOTIATION; SELECTION A. The methods and procedures for selection and negotiation will be determined by the Procurement Officer, in coordination with the user department/project manager, and set forth in the request for proposals. 6.0 SPECIAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ARCHITECT -ENGINEER AND RELATED SERVICES A. This Section prescribes guidelines and requirements for the procurement of Architectural -Engineering ("A-E") and related services. A-E Services are defined as professional services of an architectural or engineering nature that are required by law to be performed by a registered or licensed architect or engineer. Related services include: land surveying and construction project management. For the procurement of A-E and related services, the Procurement Officer shall follow the procedures set forth in this Section 6.0, in addition to the pertinent procedures set forth elsewhere in this Chapter. B. If the procurement is for A-E and related services, the selection must be based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications of prospective contractors, and shall comply with Government Code 4525, et seq., and, when applicable, the laws and regulations that govern the procurement of design -related services with federal funds (see e.g., Title 23 U.S.C. 112, Letting of Contracts and 23 CFR 172, Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service Contracts). These services shall be acquired based on a two-step, sealed bidding procedure, whereby qualifications are presented in a separate sealed envelope from a firm's price proposal. The proposals shall be evaluated based on qualifications only, and price negotiations shall then be commenced with the proposer determined by the Procurement Policy Manual 37 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 157 Commission to be most qualified. If the Commission is unable to negotiate satisfactory terms, at a fair and reasonable price, with the proposer considered to be most qualified, then negotiations shall be terminated with that proposer and commenced with the next most qualified proposer. This process shall be continued with successive qualified proposers until agreement is reached that is determined to be fair and reasonable. Procurement Policy Manual 38 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 158 CHAPTER 6 - SIMPLIFIED PURCHASE PROCEDURES 1.0 GENERAL A. Procurement of materials, supplies, or services by the Commission should adhere to the procedures in this Manual, as described in Chapter 2, Section 1.G. The procedures ensure that the appropriate authorizations are secured for the type of procurement made, and that the minimum requirements associated with the materials, equipment, supplies or services requested are procured in a fair and open manner. B. This Chapter sets forth the procedures for small purchases and other simplified purchase procedures. These purchases should be made competitively except where it is in the best interests of the Commission to accomplish such purchases non -competitively. Justification for such non-competitive procurement should be made, in writing, and maintained in the procurement record. 2.0 REQUIREMENTS FOR MICROPURCHASES A. If the purchase price for required supplies, equipment, services and/or materials is considered a micropurchase as defined in Chapter 2, Section 1.G, then multiple quotes are not required; however, such purchases should be fairly priced using a purchase technique that best serves the needs of the Commission, and rotated among commercial vendors offering competitive pricing. B. Micropurchases may be accomplished by securing one proposal or quotation from a commercial vendor offering supplies, equipment or materials to the public in substantial quantities and the price is deemed to be fair and reasonable. a. For federally -funded procurements, the determination that the price is fair and reasonable and how the determination was derived must be included as documentation in the procurement file. C. If oral quotes are obtained, written record of the quotes should be retained. The record should include, at a minimum, vendor name, telephone number and address, name of person providing the quote, and terms. 3.0 USE OF SMALL PURCHASE PROCEDURES A. For small purchases as defined in Chapter 2, Section 1.G, staff should obtain a minimum of three (3) written quotations with reasonable efforts to include at least one Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) vendor and, when practicable and appropriate, an award should be made on the basis of lowest price. B. For public works projects (i.e., maintenance, repair or construction work) and planned solicitations for services defined as small purchases in accordance with Chapter 2, Section 1.G, review by the Procurement Officer prior to the solicitation of quotes is required in order to ensure compliance with relevant insurance requirements, applicable legal mandates, e.g., insurance, bonding, prevailing wage, and payroll records. Procurement Policy Manual 39 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 159 C. The Procurement Officer should use and/or authorize the Small Purchase Procedures that are most suitable, efficient, and economical based on the circumstances of each procurement and determine that the price is fair and reasonable. 4.0 PROHIBITED USE OF SMALL PURCHASE PROCEDURES A. The Procurement Officer and or Commission staff may not divide, split or fragment a procurement totaling more than the Commission's small purchase limitation into several purchases that are less than the limit in order to use the Small Purchase Procedures. Procurement Policy Manual 40 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 160 CHAPTER 7 - NON-COMPETITIVE AND EMERGENCY PROCUREMENTS AND REMEDIAL MEASURES 1.0 NON-COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENTS A. The non-competitive procurement of non -federally funded goods and services, which otherwise require competitive procurement may be authorized under one or more of the following circumstances, subject to any minimum Commission vote required by applicable law: 1. The Commission has advertised the contract as required by this Manual and has undertaken reasonable efforts to solicit potential contractors, but has determined that competition is inadequate; 2. There is only a single source of supply available, or only one contractor is qualified to provide the service or product; 3. The goods or services are to be provided by a government or other public entity; 4. The goods or services are to be provided pursuant to an amendment of an existing contract that does not materially alter the terms and conditions of the contract (other than to extend the term and/or increase compensation to provide for the extended term or for additional goods/services to be provided under substantially the same terms of the original contract), provided that such renewal, extension or amendment is authorized or permitted by the contract; 5. The equipment to be purchased is of a technical nature and the procurement thereof without advertising is necessary in order to assure standardization of equipment and interchangeability of parts; 6. The item to be purchased is a capital maintenance item that is available only from the original manufacturer or supplier or is required to maintain system operational compatibility and connectivity with the existing system(s); 7. The contract is for employment services; 8. The contract is one for which only per diem and travel expenses are paid and there is no payment for services rendered; 9. The Commission is piggybacking on an existing agreement between a contractor and any public agency or entity within the County of Riverside and/or the County of San Bernardino, or other public entities if: (a) the proposed Commission contract is for the same material scope of work as the other contract; (b) the proposed Commission contract contains substantially the same terms as the other contract; and (c) the other contract was competitively procured in accordance with requirements applicable to such other agency's procurements; Procurement Policy Manual 41 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 161 10. The provisions listed under Chapter 8, Section 3.0 regarding federally funded sole source, non-competitive, sole source procurements are applicable; or 11. Except as may otherwise be limited by applicable law, the Commission determines that a non-competitive procurement is in the public interest and in the best interest of the Commission. B. Except as limited by applicable law, the Executive Director shall have authority to determine that non-competitive procurements are permitted under paragraph A, subparagraphs (1) through (11) for contracts for amounts less than or equal to $150,000. Commission approval is required for contracts over $150,000. Each decision to proceed with a non-competitive procurement must be supported by a written justification that is approved by the Executive Director or Procurement Officer, as required under this Manual. C. The Procurement Officer will take action, whenever possible and in coordination with the user department/project manager, to avoid the need to continue to procure the same supply, service, or construction without competition. D. A non-competitive or sole source procurement, where competition is legally required, should not be justified on the basis of any of the following circumstances: 1. The lack of adequate advance planning for the procurement of the required commodities, services, or other items; 2. Delays in the procurement caused by administrative delays, lack of sufficient procurement personnel, or improper handling of procurement requests or competitive procedures; or 3. Pending expiration of budget authority. E. The Procurement Officer should ensure that each non-competitive contract contains all of the required clauses, representations, and certifications, in accordance with the applicable laws, regulations, or Commission adopted policy. F. The Procurement Officer should ensure that proper records of each non- competitive procurement are maintained. 2.0 EMERGENCY PROCUREMENTS; REMEDIAL MEASURES A. The Commission may award a contract on an emergency basis if the requirement is essential to deal with an existing emergency condition, as defined below in Paragraph `B", and the Executive Director may award a contract when necessary as a remedial measure as defined below in Paragraph "C". The emergency procurement of supplies or services and procurements as a remedial measure should be limited to quantities and time periods sufficient to meet the immediate threat and should not be used to meet long-term requirements. B. For purposes of an emergency procurement under this Chapter, an "emergency condition" is a situation (such as a flood, epidemic, riot, equipment failure, or any other reason declared by the Commission) which creates an immediate threat to Procurement Policy Manual 42 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 162 the public health, welfare, or safety. The existence of an emergency condition creates an immediate need for supplies, services, or construction which cannot be met through normal procurement methods, and the lack of which would seriously threaten one (1) or more of the following: 1. The health or safety of any person; 2. The preservation or protection of property; 3. The continuation of necessary Commission functions; or 4. Contract delays that could result in an increase to the cost of the project. In the case of contracts for services, the Executive Director may declare the emergency condition. C. The Executive Director may authorize the expenditure of funds previously appropriated by the Commission for the direct purchases of goods and services, without following bid requirements (i) when a finding is made that immediate remedial measures are necessary to avert or alleviate damage to property, or to replace, repair, or restore damaged or destroyed property, of the Commission and are necessary in order to ensure that the facilities of the Commission are available to serve the transportation needs of the general public, and upon determining that available remedial measures, including procurement or construction in compliance with PUC § 130232, 130233, and 130234, are inadequate. D. A contract procured on an emergency basis or as a remedial measure should not be modified to expand the scope or extend the time of the procurement unless a limited number of additional commodities, services, or other items are needed to fill an ongoing emergency requirement until regular procurement action procedures initiated under other Chapters in this Manual can be completed. E. The Executive Director must, after an emergency expenditure in excess of his/her delegated signature authority, and after an expenditure necessary as a remedial measure, submit to the Commission a procurement summary explaining the necessity for the expenditure. F. The Procurement Officer should ensure that each emergency procurement contract and/or contract entered into as a remedial measure contains the required clauses, representations, and certifications, in accordance with the requirements of this Manual. G. The Procurement Officer should ensure that proper records of each non- competitive procurement are maintained in accordance with the requirements of this Manual. 3.0 WRITTEN JUSTIFICATION FOR EMERGENCY AND OTHER NON- COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENTS A. In each instance where the non-competitive procurement procedures set forth in this Chapter are used, the user department/project manager is required to prepare a written statement recording all of the facts that provide justification for proceeding with the non-competitive or emergency procurement. Procurement Policy Manual 43 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 163 B. The Procurement Officer must approve the justification for all non-competitive procurements described under this chapter before such a procurement can proceed. Procurement Policy Manual 44 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 164 CHAPTER 8 - REFERENCES TO APPLICABLE LAWS /REGULATIONS 1.0 GENERAL A. This Manual lists references to the various federal, state, and local regulations, to which the Manual was written to conform and/or comply. B. The Procurement Officer will be responsible, in cooperation with the Commission's General Counsel, for reviewing these references from time to time in order to review new requirements and to note updates to the existing regulations. 2.0 REFERENCES A. For the Commission's capital projects and contracts for goods and services utilizing FTA or FHWA funds, the provisions included in the Manual will apply only to the extent that they do not conflict with FTA or FHWA requirements, including the standards of FTA Circular 4220.1F, or the most current version thereof, entitled "Third Party Contracting Requirements" or FHWA Form FHWA-1273 entitled "Required Contract Provisions Federal -Aid Construction Contracts." In case of any conflict, the applicable federal standards shall govern. The foregoing documents, though not all-inclusive, set forth requirements that the Commission must comply with in the solicitation, selection and administration of contracts funded by the FTA and FHWA, respectively. B. For projects funded by Caltrans and/or FHWA, the selection process shall be in accordance with Caltrans' Local Assistance Procedures Manual. C. FTA Circular 4220.1F (or the most current version thereof) sets forth the requirements the Commission must adhere to in the solicitation, award, and administration of its third party contracts. FTA Circular 4220.1F applies to all FTA grantees and subrecipients that contract with third parties under FTA assistance programs. a. In addition to the requirements set forth in this Chapter 8, the FTA standards for competition are set forth generally in Chapter 1 hereof and the FTA procedures for competitive sealed bid ("low bid") procurements and competitively negotiated procurements are set forth in Chapters 3 and 5 hereof, respectively. D. Some of the requirements include the following: 1. Pre -Award Audits. A pre -award (pre -negotiation) audit shall be completed, as required based on the participating state or federal funds, for each consultant contract. 2. Brooks Act Provisions. The provisions of the Brooks Act (40 U.S.C. 544) require local agencies to award federally funded engineering and design contracts on the basis of fair and open competitive negotiations, demonstrated competence, and professional qualifications (23 CFR, Section 172). Procurement Policy Manual 45 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 165 3. Required Contract Provisions/Forms. a. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise i. Notice to Proposers Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Information ii. Standard Agreement for Subcontractor/DBE Participation Local Agency Proposer DBE Commitment (Consultant Contracts) iv. Local Agency Proposer DBE Information (Consultant Contract) v. Final Report -Utilization of DBE, First -Tier vi. Subcontractor Listing b. Federal Lobbying Restrictions, Title 31 U.S.C. Section 1352 i. Non -lobbying Certification for Federal -aid Contracts ii. Disclosure of Lobbying c. Financial Provisions. i. Compliance with 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. ii. Compliance with 48 CFR, Chp. 1, Part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures. 4. iii. Provisions required by Caltrans Master Funding Agreement. Caltrans/FWHA Authorization to Proceed. FHWA or Caltrans acting in FHWA's behalf must give the local agency an "Authorization to Proceed" with a project prior to the performance of any work for which federal reimbursement is to be requested, including the pre -award audit. Copies of the "Authorization to Proceed" and the consultant contract must be retained in the project files for future audit purposes. 5. Certification of Consultant and Local Agency. The Procurement Officer will be responsible for ensuring that, when required, the certifications shown in Exhibits 10 F, "Certification of Consultant," and 10 G, "Certification of Local Agency" of the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual are incorporated into the solicitation and executed by the appropriate signatories. a,--The-ceftif'featio st be e-xc^cc t db" eipal-er-accth(fize- corporate official of the consultant, and by a principal administrative officer of the governmental agency responsible for the selection of the consultant. It is essential that these certifications be preserved in the project files. 6,5. Veterans Employment. Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5325(k), the Commission shall ensure that contractors working on an FTA-funded capital project Procurement Policy Manual 46 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 166 give a hiring preference, to the extent practicable, to veterans (as defined in Section 2108 of Title 5) who have the requisite skills and abilities to perform the construction work required under the contract. This subsection shall not be understood, construed or enforced in any manner that would require an employer to give preference to any veteran over any equally qualified applicant who is a member of any racial or ethnic minority, female, an individual with a disability, or former employee. For FHWA-funded capital projects, the Commission shall comply with the veteran's preference requirement, as set forth in 23 U.S.C. 114. E. Though not an all-inclusive listing, the following laws, regulations and code sections are applicable to Commission contracts: Federal Statute, Regulations, Policies, and Agreements Subject 2CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards 49 CFR Part 26 Participation by Minority Business Enterprises; DBE Program FAR Part 31 FTA Circular 4220.1x Contract Cost Principles and Procedures Third Party Contracting Requirements FTA Circular 5010.1x Grant Management Guidelines FTA Master Agreement Terms & Conditions of Grantee Administration of Projects Supported & Funded by the FTA FARCaltrans Local Assistance Master Agreement FAR Part 31 Contract Cost Principles and ProceduresTerms & Conditions of Grantee Administration of Projects Supported & Funded by the FHWA or Caltrans 23 U.S.C. 114 / 23 CFR 633 23 U.S.C. 315 / 49 CFR 1.48 Form FHWA-1273 entitled "Required Contract Provisions Federal -Aid Construction Contracts." 23 CFR 172 Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Services CA State Codes Section(s) Subject Civil Code Civil Code Code of Civil Procedure 9550-9566 Payment Bond 3320 Payments to Prime Design Professionals 995.311 Bond Issuer Requirements Government Code Government Code Government Code Labor Code 4525 et seq. Architect & Engineering Services 6250 - 6270 Public Records Disclosure 5956 et seq. Infrastructure Projects 1777.1 Debarment by California Labor Commissioner Labor Code Public Contract Code 1770-1780 Prevailing Wage, Work Hours, Certified Payroll Records, Apprentices 1103 Responsibility on Public Works Contracts Procurement Policy Manual 47 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 167 CA State Codes Section(s) Subject Public Contract Code Public Contract Code Public Contract Code Public Contract Code 1104 Plans and Specifications 3300 Contractor's License 3400 Brand Name OR Equal; Restrictive Clauses 4100 - 4114 Subcontracting Public Contract Code 5100 - 5107 Relief of Bidders Public Contract Code 6100 - 6610 Awarding of Contracts Public Contract Code Public Contract Code 6700 et. seq. Construction Manager/General Contractor Authority 6820 et seq. Design/Build Authority Public Contract Code Public Contract Code Public Contract Code 7100 - 7200 Contract Clauses, Non -Collusion Affidavit 9201 - 9204 Claims and Disputes 10335 et seq. Service Contracts Public Contract Code 20101 Prequalification Public Contract Code 20103.6 Limitation on Architect's Indemnity Obligation Public Contract Code 20103.8 Alternative Bids Public Contract Code 20104-20104.6 Resolution of Construction Claims Public Contract Code 20104.50 Progress Payments on Public Works Public Contract Code 22300 Substitution of Securities Public Utilities Code 130221 Contracting With Other Government Agencies and Other Persons Public Utilities Code Public Utilities Code 130232 130239 Award of Contracts Based On Price or Price and Other Factors; Bid Security; Emergency Procurements; Advertising; Immediate Remedial Measures; Rejecting Bids 130232(c) Authorization of Executive Director for Bid Expenditures <$50,000. Public Utilities Code 130232(d) Bid Security for Construction Work >$25,000 3.0 FTA/FHWA-FUNDED PROCUREMENT BY NON-COMPETITIVE (SOLE SOURCE) PROPOSALS A. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, federally funded contracts must comply with the federal requirements for non-competitive or sole source procurements. Non-competitive or sole source procurements are accomplished through solicitation of a proposal from only one source, or after solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. A contract change that amounts to a "cardinal change" or a "tag -on" as defined in FTA Circular 4220.1 f that involves a major deviation from the original purpose is considered a sole source procurement on a federally funded contract that must comply with this paragraph. 1. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals may be used only when the award of a contract is infeasible under small purchase procedures, Procurement Policy Manual 48 JuneDecember 20183 Revision: 43 168 competitive sealed bids, or competitive proposals and at least one of the following circumstances applies: a. The item is available only from a single source; b. The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from competitive solicitation; c. FTA/FHWA, as applicable, authorizes noncompetitive negotiations e.g., if FTA/FHWA, as applicable, provides a joint procurement grant or a research project grant with a particular firm or combination of firms, the grant agreement is the sole source approval; d. After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate; e. The item is an associated capital maintenance item as defined in 49 U.S.C. §5307(a)(1) that is procured directly from the original manufacturer or supplier of the item to be replaced. The grantee must first certify in writing to FTA: i. that such manufacturer or supplier is the only source for such item; and ii. that the price of such item is no higher than the price paid for such item by like customers; or f. Any other circumstance justifying sole source procurement set forth in the applicable federal rules and regulations. 2. For Caltrans or FHWA funded procurements, a PIF has been approved by the applicable funding entity. 3. A cost analysis, i.e., verifying the proposed cost data, the projections of the data, and the evaluation of the specific elements of costs and profit, is required. 4.0 DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS A. In order to ensure the Commission's compliance with the federal DBE Program on all applicable procurements funded with United States Department of Transportation (DOT) dollars, the Commission will make reasonable efforts to utilize disadvantaged business enterprises in compliance with applicable federal regulations. B. The Commission's procurement process is structured to ensure that its DBE Program supports the Commission's commitment to promote, foster and utilize disadvantaged business enterprises as required and defined by applicable federal regulations. C. As a condition of funding assistance, and in accordance with DOT DBE regulations published in applicable federal regulations, the Commission is required to submit for approval a DBE Program and regular DBE goals, which it Procurement Policy Manual 49 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 169 will make good faith efforts to achieve through procurement actions carried out under this Manual. D. Pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200.321, the Commission shall also take affirmative steps to assure that minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible on federally funded projects. 5.0 GEOGRAPHICAL PREFERENCES A. For any federally -funded contracts, except when procuring A-E services, the Commission is prohibited from using statutorily or administratively imposed in- state or local geographical preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals unless federal statutes expressly mandate or encourage geographic preference. 6.0 REVENUE CONTRACTS A. The Commission may enter into revenue contracts with a third party whereby the primary purpose is to either generate revenues in connection with a transit -related activity or create business opportunities utilizing an FTA-funded asset. The FTA requires such third party revenue contracts to be awarded utilizing competitive selection procedures and principles. The extent of and type of competition required is within the discretionary judgment of the Commission. 7.0 STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS A. The Commission shall comply with applicable federal statutory and regulatory requirements (such as Davis -Bacon Act, DBE, Debarment and Suspension, Clean Air, Environmental and Conservation Requirements, Buy America and Cargo Preference) in carrying out federally -funded procurement actions under this Manual. Below is a contract clause matrix that is applicable to third -party contract provisions for federally funded contracts, excluding micropurchases and except for Davis -Bacon requirements which apply to construction contracts exceeding $2,000. The matrix should be reviewed at least annually for any regulatory changes. TYPE OF PROCUREMENT PROVISION Professional Services/A&E Operations/ Management Rolling Stock Purchase Construction Materials & Supplies No Federal Government Obligations to Third Parties (by Use of a Disclaimer) All All All All All False Statements or Claims Civil and Criminal Fraud All All All All All Access to Third Party Contract Records All All All All All Changes to Federal Requirements All All All All All Termination >$10,000 if 2 CFR Part 200applies. >$10,000 if 2 CFR Part 200 applies. >$10,000 if 2 CFR Part 200 applies. >$10,000 if 2 CFR Part 200 applies. >$10,000 if 2 CFR Part 200 applies. Civil Rights (Title VI, ADA, EEO All All All>$10,000 All All Procurement Policy Manual 50 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 170 except Special DOL EEO clause for construction projects) Special DOL EEO clause for construction projects >$10,000 Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs) All All All All All * Incorporation of FTA Terms All All All All All Debarment and Suspension >$25,000 >$25,000 >$25,000 >$25,000 >$25,000 Buy America >$150,000 >$150,000 >$150,000 Resolution of Disputes, Breaches, or Other Litigation >$100,000 >$100,000 >$100,000 >$100,000 >$100,000 TYPE OF PROCUREMENT PROVISION Professional Services/A&E Operations/ Management Rolling Stock Purchase Construction Materials & Supplies Lobbying >$100,000 >$100,000 >$100,000 >$100,000 >$100,000 Clean Air >$150,000 >$150,000 >$150,000 >$150,000 >$150,000 Clean Water >$150,000 >$150,000 >$150,000 >$150,000 >$150,000 Cargo Preference Transport by ocean vessel. Transport by ocean vessel. Transport by ocean vessel. Fly America Foreign air transp./travel. Foreign air transp./travel. Foreign air transp./travel. Foreign air transp./travel. Foreign air transp./travel. Veterans Hiring Preference All Davis -Bacon Act >$2,000 (also ferries). Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act >$100,000 (transportation services excepted). >$100,000 >$100,000 (also ferries). Copeland Anti -Kickback Act Section 1 Section 2 All > $2,000 (also ferries). Bonding $100,000 Seismic Safety A&E for new buildings & additions. New buildings & additions. *Transit Employee Protective Arrangements Transit operations. * Charter Service Operations All * School Bus Operations All * Drug Use and Testing Transit operations. * Alcohol Misuse and Testing Transit Procurement Policy Manual 51 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 171 operations. Patent Rights R & D Rights in Data and Copyrights R & D Energy Conservation All All All All All Recycled Products EPA -selected items $10,000 or more annually. EPA -selected items $10,000 or more annually. EPA -selected items $10,000 or more annually. Conformance with ITS National Architecture ITS projects. ITS projects. ITS projects. ITS projects. ITS projects. ADA Access A&E All All All All Notification of Federal Participation for States Limited to States. Limited to States. Limited to States. Limited to States. Limited to States. * Applies only to FTA funding Caltrans Fiscal Provisions Checklist All contract fiscal provisions must utilize the language specified by Caltrans and set forth in the LAPM sample contract language form. The clauses that must be used verbatim are for the items specified below (except as otherwise noted). Consult the LAPM form, and the latest RCTC model contract for Caltrans/FHWA funded projects. Performance Period: Beginning date cannot be prior to the date Caltrans issues the conformance letter, if applicable. Allowable Costs and Payments: The contract method of payment must be one of the four methods required as listed in Section 10.2 of the LAPM. Termination: The provision must contain language regarding termination for cause and convenience Per 23 CFR 172.9 (c)(1)(xii). Cost Principles and Administrative Requirements. * Travel and subsistence in accordance with DPA regulations * Maintain an accounting system that accumulates and segregates project costs * Accounting system must conform to GAAP Retention of Records/Audit. Audit Review Procedures, including the Audit Clause. Ensure use of appropriate clauses for (i) contracts $150,000 or greater; or (ii) contracts $3,500,000 or greater. Subcontracting Equipment Purchase State Prevailing Wage Rates. Conflict of Interest. Rebates, Kickbacks, or other Unlawful Considerations. Prohibition of Expending State or Federal Funds for Lobbying. * Specific provisions addressing these items are not included in LAPM form, but are required and are included in the RCTC model contract. Procurement Policy Manual 52 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 172 CHAPTER 9 - DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS PROPERTY 1.0 DEFINITIONS A. "Surplus personal property" shall mean personal property of the Commission which is no longer needed or fit for its intended purpose or has exceeded its useful life. B. "Surplus real property" shall mean real property of the Commission which is no longer needed for a specified project. 2.0 DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY A. Upon recommendation by the Executive Director, designated Commission staff may dispose of surplus real property in accordance with the RCTC Right of Way Policies and Procedures Manual. 3.0 DISPOSAL OF PERSONAL PROPERTY A. Upon recommendation by the Executive Director and in accordance with applicable state or federal funding requirements, designated Commission staff may dispose of all surplus and obsolete personal property by donation, bid, auction, negotiated sale or exchange. If the disposal of such items is conducted by bid, the sale shall be conducted in accordance with generally accepted best practices and applicable laws and regulations. The Commission staff shall attempt to obtain the best value for the property that can reasonably be obtained. Procurement Policy Manual 53 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 173 174 CHAPTER 10 - OTHER PROCUREMENT MATTERS 1.0 DISPUTES, CLAIMS, AND CHANGES —DEFINITIONS A. Change Orders — the commercial and technical resolution of a contract modification. The change order document can be unilateral or bilateral in execution. B. Potential Claim — written notice provided to the Commission by the contractor when the: 1. Parties are unable to reach bilateral agreement on a change and the contractor is provided a unilateral change order ("protest"); or, 2. Contractor perceives that it is entitled to additional compensation (time or money) for something it believes to constitute extra work performed or to be performed. C. Claim — differences that have developed during the contract, under protest or under notice of potential claim, which are not resolved at the time the contractor returns the proposed final pay estimate. D. Dispute — a disagreement between the parties as to the merits, amount or remedy arising out of an issue in controversy, including a disagreement regarding a Claim or asserted default. E. Amendment — a modification considered outside the original contract scope or terms and formalized with a written agreement signed by both parties. 2.0 DISPUTES, CLAIMS, AND CHANGES —GENERAL A. The Procurement Officer is responsible for documenting negotiation activities for the record, and should be present at all professional services and construction contract negotiations. B. The Procurement Officer or project manager, as required, prepares the appropriate documentation (e.g., change order forms) for review and approval by the Commission's Executive Director or Commission, prior to issuance to the consultant/contractor for signature. This document includes full definition of work scope, impact on DBE goals, definition of time and schedule impacts, and price. The change order language stipulates that the agreed -upon terms are all inclusive, and no other relief will be available regarding this work. 1. For federally -funded contracts, any damages recovered must be credited to the project involved unless the FTA/FHWA, as applicable, permits otherwise. 2. For federally -funded contracts, change orders that amount to cardinal changes or tag-ons shall comply with Chapter 8, Section 3.0(A). 3.0 TERMINATION A. All Commission contracts exceeding $25,000 should contain provisions enabling the Commission to terminate such contracts for the convenience of the Procurement Policy Manual 54 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 175 Commission, and all federally funded contracts must contain such provisions. These provisions should specify the manner in which such termination will be effected and the basis for settlement. There should also be included in such contracts appropriate provisions specifying causes for which the contracts may be terminated for default. B. Terminations for Convenience of the Commission 1. Commission contracts will be terminated for convenience only when this is determined to be in the best interests of the Commission. In lieu of issuing a notice of termination for convenience, the Procurement Officer will effect a no -cost settlement agreement where possible and appropriate. 2. Formal written notice to the contractor is necessary to terminate a contract for convenience. Such notice will state that the contract is being terminated pursuant to the termination for convenience provision of the contract, the effective date, the extent of termination and instructions to the contractor to cease performance under the contract. 3. The Procurement Officer will negotiate a no -cost settlement with the contractor if possible. Otherwise, the Procurement Officer will negotiate an appropriate settlement agreement with the contractor pursuant to the provisions of the termination for convenience clause of the contract. C. Terminations For Default 1. If a contractor's right to proceed is terminated for default, the Commission may take over and complete the work or cause it to be completed, and the contractor and his sureties, if any, shall be liable to the Commission for any increased costs caused thereby. The contractor and his sureties should, in addition to increased costs in completing the work, be liable for liquidated damages, if liquidated damages are provided in the contract, or for actual damages, if liquidated damages are not so provided. 2. If the Procurement Officer determines that the contractor's failure to perform arises from causes which are excusable under the terms of the contract, the Procurement Officer shall not terminate the contractor's right to proceed, nor shall he/she charge the contractor with liquidated damages (or if no liquidated damages, then actual damages) because of any delays occasioned by such causes. 3. Where the surety does not complete performance of the contract, the Procurement Officer normally will complete the performance of work by awarding a new contract based on the same plans and specifications. Such award may be the result of competitive bidding or negotiation; whichever procedure is most appropriate under the circumstances. The Procurement Officer must use reasonable diligence to obtain the lowest price available for completion. 4. If, after due consideration, the Procurement Officer determines that termination is not in the best interest of the Commission although the contractor is in default, the Procurement Officer may permit the contractor Procurement Policy Manual 55 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 176 to continue the work, and the contractor and his sureties shall be liable to the Commission for liquidated damages, as specified in the contract, or if liquidated damages are not so specified, for any actual damages occasioned by the failure of the contractor to complete the work in accordance with the terms of the contract. 5. Any provision for a liquidated damages assessment must be at a specific rate per day for each day of overrun and must be specified in the contract. a. For FTA-funded contracts, any damages recovered must be credited to the project involved unless the FTA permits otherwise. 4.0 BONDS, OTHER SECURITIES AND INSURANCE A. The Commission should specify bonding, in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements for all public works contracts. 1. In general, all construction contracts over $25,000 require a payment bond in the amount of 100% of the contract value. 2. All FTA-funded construction contracts over $100,000 require a performance bond in the amount of 100% of the contract value and a bid guarantee in the amount of no less than 5% of the contract value. 3. Bids for construction of facilities where the work is anticipated to exceed $25,000 require bid security as set forth in PUC § 130232. B. The Procurement Officer may require any of the following types of security for any solicitation or contract subject to this Manual, other than a small purchase, regardless of the estimated amount of the contract: 1. Bid bonds; 2. Other bid or proposal security; 3. Construction performance and payment bonds; and 4. Performance or payment bonds or other security on non -construction contracts. C. Requirement for Bonds To Be Executed By An Admitted Surety Insurer 1. California Code of Civil Procedure § 995.311 calls for any bond required on a public works contract to be executed by an admitted surety insurer. 2. The Commission has a duty to verify that an admitted surety insurer executes the bond. The Procurement Officer should print out information from the website of the California Department of Insurance (http://www.insurance.ca.gov/docs/FS-CompanyProfiles.htm) confirming that the surety is an admitted surety insurer and attach it to the bond. D. For federally funded procurements, the Commission shall not require unnecessary experience or excessive bonding. Procurement Policy Manual 56 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 177 5.0 CONTRACT CLOSEOUT A. A completed contract is one which is both physically and administratively complete and in which all aspects of contractual performance have been accomplished, terminated, or otherwise disposed of by contract modification. A contract is physically complete only after all articles and services called for under the contract, including such related items as reports, spare parts, and exhibits, have been delivered to and accepted by the Commission, including those articles and services for which no specific compensation may have been stipulated. A contract is administratively complete when all payments have been made and administrative actions accomplished. B. The project manager, in cooperation with the Procurement Officer, is responsible for review of the contract file and obtaining all necessary documentation to ensure that: (1) all deliverables and/or services (including any reports) required under the contract have been received and accepted; (2) the terms and conditions of the contract have been complied with; (3) disposition of accountable property under the contract has been accomplished; all necessary actions including final payment and releases required to close the contract are completed and documented. C. Small purchase files should be considered closed when the Procurement Officer receives evidence of receipt of property and final payment. D. A contract file should not be closed in any of the following situations: 1. If the contract is the subject of a claim or dispute; 2. If the contract is in litigation or under appeal; 3. In the case of a termination, if all termination actions have not been completed; or 4. If state or federal approval is required and has not been received. Procurement Policy Manual 57 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 178 CHAPTER 11- PAYMENT 1.0 COMMISSION PAYMENT PROCESS A. The Commission will promptly process all contract payments with necessary controls to assure compliance with all contract terms and conditions in accordance with internal procedures recommended by the Chief Financial Officer and authorized by the Executive Director. B. The Procurement Officer should clearly specify in solicitations and contracts the form and content of an acceptable invoice, including a requirement that invoices be sequentially numbered, that they contain a date and contract number and the services for which they are invoicing, the period of performance being invoiced, and to whom invoices are to be sent. 2.0 PROGRESS PAYMENTS A. The Commission may provide for progress payments under contracts that require long time periods to complete contract performance or if the use of progress payments contributes to the effective and efficient administration of consultant/contractor work. Progress payments will be made on the basis of allowable costs incurred by the consultant/contractor, and the stage of completion of the contract. 1. Criteria. Contract clauses providing for progress payments should be used when the investment in work and progress is expected to be great enough to add substantial costs to the contract or strain the consultant/contractor's cash flow or ability to obtain financing. Under no circumstances should payments exceed the consultant/contractor's physical completion of the Work, nor should they amount to advance payments. Progress payments can be based on a periodic voucher for expenditures, a milestone, or the Commission's estimate of work accomplished as defined in the contract. 2. For federally funded procurements, the Commission must obtain adequate security (i.e., title to work in progress; letter of credit) for any progress payments made. 3. For FTA-funded procurements, advance payments are prohibited unless prior written concurrence is obtained from the FTA. B. Progress Payments on Public Works In accordance with PCC § 20104.50, the Commission must make progress payments within 30 days after receipt of an undisputed and properly submitted payment request from a contractor on a construction contract. If the Commission fails to make timely payment, the Commission may be required to pay interest to the contractor equivalent to the legal rate set forth in subdivision (s) of Section 685.010 of the Code of Civil Procedure. C. Progress Payments and Retentions on Architect, Engineer, and Land Surveyor Contracts Procurement Policy Manual 58 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 179 Pursuant to California Civil Code §3320, for any contract for public works or improvement, the Commission shall pay to the prime design professional any progress payment within 30 days of receipt of a written demand for payment in accordance with the contract, and the final retention payment, if applicable, within 45 days of receipt of a written demand for payment in accordance with the contract. If any amount is wrongfully withheld or is not timely paid, the prime design professional should be entitled to a penalty of 1 %2 percent for the improperly withheld amount, in lieu of any interest otherwise due, per month for every month that payment is not made. 3.0 PROMPT PAYMENT TO SUBCONTRACTORS —FEDERALLY FUNDED AGREEMENTS A. In accordance with 49 CFR Part 26, Commission contracts above the small purchase threshold must require that the prime contractor or subcontractor shall pay to any subcontractor, not later than 7 days of receipt of each progress payment from the Commission, unless otherwise agreed to in writing, the respective amounts paid to the contractor on account for the work performed by the subcontractors, to the extent of each subcontractor's interest therein. The Commission contract may provide that, in the event that there is a good faith dispute over all or any portion of the amount due on a progress payment from the prime contractor or subcontractor to a subcontractor, then the prime contractor or subcontractor may withhold no more than 150 percent of the disputed amount. B. The Commission must also require the prompt return of retainage payments from the prime contractor to the subcontractor within 7 days after the subcontractor's work is satisfactorily completed. 4.0 PAYMENT OF RETENTION ON PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS A. Pursuant to PCC § 7107, within 60 days after the date of completion of the work of improvement, the Commission must release any retention withheld except funds withheld to satisfy outstanding stop notices or otherwise properly withheld. In the event of a dispute between the Commission and the original contractor, the Commission may withhold from the final payment an amount not to exceed 150 percent of the disputed amount. 5.0 REQUEST FOR PAYMENT CERTIFICATION A. All contracts above the small purchase threshold may contain a clause, which requires the contractor to submit with each request for payment, a certification that the claim for payment is true, correct, and for services rendered and/or supplies delivered in accordance with the contract. B. The user department/project manager will disapprove and Accounts Payable will return unpaid any request for payment which does not contain the certification when required. Procurement Policy Manual 59 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 180 REVISION HISTORY: Revision No. Revisions Adopted 0 Adopted by the Commission 7/11/12 1 Adopted by the Commission 12/12/12 2 Adopted by the Commission 9/9/15 3 Adopted by the Commission 12/13/17pending 4 Adopted by the Commission pending Procurement Policy Manual 60 JuneDecember 20187 Revision: 43 181 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 18-008 RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION REGARDING THE REVISED PROCUREMENT POLICY MANUAL WHEREAS, the Commission previously adopted Resolution No. 17-016, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Regarding the Revised Procurement Policy Manual"; and WHEREAS, the Commission received corrective action recommendations from the California Department of Transportation as a result of an incurred cost audit completed in October 2017; WHEREAS, the Commission is required to comply with the Office of Management and Budget's issuance of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Grant Guidance); and WHEREAS, the Commission desires to update its procurement policies and procedures to continue to be a comprehensive, useful framework and incorporate best practices for the Commission's procurements. NOW, THEREFORE, the Riverside County Transportation Commission does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. Section 2. The Procurement Policy Manual previously adopted on September 9, 2015, is hereby replaced in its entirety by the revised Procurement Policy Manual, set forth in Attachment 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein. The Riverside County Transportation Commission hereby approves and adopts the Procurement Policy Manual, as revised, to be effective immediately. 182 APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 2018. Dana W. Reed, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Lisa Mobley, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 183 AGENDA ITEM 8G RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer Matt Wallace, Procurement Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Federal Transit Administration Proposed Triennial Overall Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Goal for Federal Fiscal Years 2019-2021 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt 9 percent as the Commission's Federal Transit Administration (FTA) proposed triennial overall disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) race -neutral goal for Federal Fiscal Years 2019-21 for the period October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2021; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 18-007, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Adopting Its Triennial Overall Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Goal (49 CFR Part 26) as it Applies to Funding Received Directly from the Federal Transit Administration". BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In accordance with regulations of the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) under Title 49 CFR Part 26, the Commission must implement a DBE program and develop a triennial overall DBE program goal as a condition to receive a commitment for federal financial assistance from the FTA as a direct recipient. The DBE Program and Policy Statement was developed by the Commission to address this requirement and is administered by the Commission's DBE Liaison Officer, who is the Commission's Procurement Manager. This DBE program has been implemented in a wholly race - neutral fashion to conform with directives issued by the U.S. DOT related to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) decision in the Western States Paving Co. vs. Washington State Department of Transportation case. These directives prohibit any U.S. DOT recipient in the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, including the Commission, from using race -conscious contract DBE goals on U.S. DOT -assisted contracts if the recipient does not possess evidence of discrimination in its transportation contracting program. The Commission does not possess such evidence of discrimination and for this reason has implemented a wholly race - neutral DBE program. Agenda Item 8G 184 Under a wholly race -neutral DBE program, contracts let by the Commission will not include a DBE participation goal as a condition of award. Rather, in accordance with 49 CFR Part 26, the Commission performs extensive small business outreach efforts and uses other race -neutral measures when applicable. The proposed FTA triennial overall DBE Program race -neutral goal is 9 percent. The goal is based on the relative availability of DBE firms in the Commission's geographic market area (defined as Riverside County, Orange County, and San Bernardino County). The established market area represents where the Commission anticipates a majority of contractors and subcontractors will be located. Data to determine this relative availability was extracted from the California Unified Certification Program DBE Directory of Certified Firms and the 2015 U.S. Census Bureau County Business Pattern database. The analysis, which is attached, details the methodology utilized in developing the triennial goal for anticipated Commission projects, which will be funded either in whole or in part with FTA funds. Anticipated projects include, but are not limited to: • Riverside Layover Facility North; • Riverside Downtown Platform and Bridge Project; and • Moreno Valley Track and Bridge Project. Additionally, the Commission is the direct recipient of several FTA grants that will be passed - through to Metrolink (Southern California Regional Rail Authority). The Commission will be responsible for oversight of Metrolink's DBE program compliance related to those funds and has entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Metrolink to further define DBE roles and responsibilities. Metrolink, as a direct recipient of other FTA funds, will adopt its own DBE program when soliciting and awarding contracts that are partially or fully funded with the FTA funds passed -through by the Commission to Metrolink. The Commission also reallocates FTA funding to the Riverside Transit Agency and has a similar MOU in place. The proposed overall triennial goal was published on April 12, 2018 in the Press Enterprise and on the Commission's website to inform the public of the proposed goal and the rationale for setting the goal. These documents were available for inspection at the Commission office for 30 days following the date of the notice. Additionally, staff consulted with minority, women, local business associations, and community organizations, which could be expected to have information concerning the availability of disadvantaged and non -disadvantaged businesses, the effects of discrimination on opportunities for DBEs, and staff's efforts to establish a level playing field for the participation of DBEs. Staff reached out to a total of 11 local minority, women, and community business organizations to provide them information on the RCTC DBE program and specifically the draft proposed FTA Overall DBE Goal -Setting Methodology for FFY 2019-2021. Each organization was contacted multiple times by telephone and email. Two of the organizations participated in a phone call. Comments received did not have an impact on the Commission's proposed FTA Overall DBE Goal. There is no financial impact to the Commission. Agenda Item 8G 185 Attachments: 1) Resolution No. 18-007 2) Draft RCTC FTA Overall DBE Goal — Setting Methodology for FFY 2019 — FFY 2021 Agenda Item 8G 186 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 18-007 RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ADOPTING ITS TRIENNIAL OVERALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM GOAL (49 CFR PART 26) AS IT APPLIES TO FUNDING RECEIVED DIRECTLY FROM THE FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) adopted a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program in 2009, 2012, as updated in 2015; WHEREAS, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in a decision regarding the Washington State Department of Transportation, determined that sufficient evidence must exist to support the use of race -conscious measures on federal -aid contracts; WHEREAS, the Commission does not currently have sufficient evidence of discrimination or its effects which would support the adoption or implementation of a race -conscious DBE goal; WHEREAS, the Commission is still required, pursuant to 49 CFR Part 26, to adopt a DBE goal and implement its DBE program as applies to federal funding received by the Commission directly from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA); WHEREAS, the methodology to determine the agency's DBE goal shall be in accordance with 49 CFR Part 26; WHEREAS, the Commission is a direct recipient of FTA funds; WHEREAS, in light of the Ninth Circuit ruling and the U.S. DOT directive, and in accordance with 49 CFR Part 26, the Commission has utilized an all race -neutral methodology in calculating the Triennial Overall DBE Program goal. NOW, THEREFORE, the Commission hereby resolves as follows: SECTION 1. The Commission submits its Triennial Overall DBE Program goal for Federal Fiscal Years (FFY) for the period October 1, 2018 — September 20, 2021 (FFY 2019-21). SECTION 2. The Triennial Overall DBE Program goal shall be 9 percent. SECTION 3. The Commission shall implement a race -neutral DBE program, and shall take affirmative steps to utilize race -neutral means of meeting its overall goal. 187 ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 2018. Dana W. Reed, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Lisa Mobley, Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 188 ATTACHMENT 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Overall DBE Goal -Setting Methodology F FY 2019-F FY 2021 Submitted in fulfillment of: Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 26 This analysis is prepared exclusively for RCTC; it is non -transferable and is not to be duplicated. 189 RCTC FTA DBE Goal Methodology FFY 2019-FFY 2021 Page 2 of 13 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 3 II. BACKGROUND 3 III. FTA-ASSISTED CONTRACTING PROGRAM FOR FFY 2019-2021 3 IV. GOAL METHODOLOGY 4 Step 1: Determination of a Base Figure (26.45) 4 Step 2: Adjusting the Base Figure 6 A. Past DBE Goal Attainments 6 B. Disparity Study 7 C. Other Available Evidence 7 V. PROPOSED OVERALL DBE GOAL 7 VI. RACE -NEUTRAL IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES 8 Fostering Small Business Participation 8 VII. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND FACILITATION 9 Attachment 1: Website notification 10 Attachment 2: Consultative Process Summary 11 190 RCTC FTA DBE Goal Methodology FFY 2019-FFY 2021 Page 3 of 13 I. INTRODUCTION The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) herein sets forth its Overall Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Goal and corresponding federally prescribed goal -setting methodology for the three-year Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) goal period of 2019-2021 (October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2021), pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 26 "Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in U.S. Department of Transportation Programs." The purpose of the DBE goal - setting process is to level the playing field to allow DBEs to compete fairly for Department of Transportation -assisted contracts; however, the program must be narrowly tailored in accordance with applicable law. II. BACKGROUND RCTC is a recipient of U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), funding. As a condition of receiving this assistance, RCTC signed an assurance that it will comply with FTA's DBE requirements. In accordance with Title 49 CFR Part 26 provisions: Participation by DBEs in USDOT Programs, RCTC is required to develop and submit a Triennial Overall DBE Goal for its FTA-assisted projects. RCTC herein presents its Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2019-2021. III. FTA-ASSISTED CONTRACTING PROGRAM FOR FFY 2019-2021 Table 1 represents RCTC's FTA-assisted contracting program, which consists of projects considered in preparing this goal methodology. The projects, which include Construction, Professional Services and Materials/Supplies contracting opportunities, are anticipated to be awarded during the triennial period. Each of these projects has potential subcontracting opportunities. TABLE 1 PROJECT NAME/DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATED FTA $SHARE ESTIMATED FTA %SHARE Riverside Layover Facility North - proposes to expand the existing Layover Facility to accommodate three storage tracks with an overall storage capacity of three six -car train sets. $5,500,000 $5,332,444 97.0% Riverside Downtown Platform and Bridge Project - proposes to construct an additional platform, extended bridge and elevator, and associated tracks on the south side of the station. $24,842,000 $2,500,000 10.1% Moreno Valley Track and Bridge Project - proposes to construct an additional platform and a pedestrian overpass and rehabilitate the initial 2.7 miles of double track corridor. The track will receive a new signal system and Positive Train Control. $27,335,000 $3,100,000 11.3% Total $57,677,000 $10,932,444 19.0% 191 RCTC FTA DBE Goal Methodology FFY 2019-FFY 2021 Page 4 of 13 In addition to the above listed projects, RCTC has $60 million in grants that will be reallocated to Metrolink (Southern California Regional Rail Authority). RCTC will be responsible for oversight of the DBE Program compliance for these projects and has executed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Metrolink, which includes oversight provisions that allow RCTC to review Metrolink's solicitations and resulting contracts to verify that adequate DBE Program flow down provisions are included in each document. Metrolink, as a direct recipient of other FTA funds, will adopt its own DBE Program when soliciting and awarding contracts that are partially or fully funded with the FTA funds reallocated by RCTC to Metrolink. RCTC also reallocates FTA funding to the Riverside Transit Agency and has a similar MOU in place. Table 2 provides a summary of the categories of work with estimated cost breakdown for each. Categories of work are groups utilizing comparable North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes for purposes of weighting the categories of work based on the engineer's estimates. TABLE 2: CATEGORY OF WORK NAICS CODES ESTIMATED FTA $ SHARE ESTIMATED FTA % SHARE Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction 237310 $527,841 4.8% Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction 237990 $1,276,073 11.7% Poured Concrete Foundation and Structure Contractors 238110 $10,812 0.1% Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors 238210 $537,899 4.9% Site Preparation Contractors 238910 $399,446 3.7% All Other Specialty Trade Contractors 238990 $607,304 5.6% Offices of Lawyers 541110 $108,116 1.0% Engineering Services 541330 $4,756,997 43.5% Testing Laboratories 541380 $108,116 1.0% Environmental Consulting Services 541620 $1,163,382 10.6% All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 541990 $1,436,458 13.1% TOTAL $10,932,444 100% IV. GOAL METHODOLOGY Step 1: Determination of a Base Figure (26.45)1 To establish RCTC's Base Figure of the relative availability of DBEs to all comparable firms (DBE and Non - DBE) available to bid or propose on RCTC's FTA-assisted contracting opportunities projected to be solicited during the triennial goal period, RCTC followed the prescribed federal methodology to determine relative availability. This was accomplished by assessing the California Unified Certification Program (CUCP) DBE 1 26.45 represents Title 49 CFR Part 26 regulatory goal setting methodology reference. 192 RCTC FTA DBE Goal Methodology FFY 2019-FFY 2021 Page S of 13 Database of Certified Firms and the 2015 U.S. Census Bureau County Business Patterns Database within RCTC's market area (defined as Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties) for each of the categories of work defined in Table 2. RCTC's local market area consists of the geographic area where a substantial majority of contracting dollars are expended and/or where the substantial majority of contractor and subcontractor bids or quotes are located. RCTC's bidder's list was reviewed and it confirms this market area. In accordance with the formula below, the Base Figure is derived by dividing the number of ready, willing and able DBE firms identified for each work category by the number of all firms identified for each corresponding work category (relative availability), weighting the relative availability for each work category by the corresponding work category weight from Table 2 (weighted ratio), and adding the weighted ratio figures together. (Number of Ready,Willing and Able DBEs) Base Figure = X Weight X 100 Number of All Ready,Willing and Able Firms b For the numerator: CUCP DBE Database of Certified Firms b For the denominator: 2015 U.S. Census Bureau's Business Patterns Database A concerted effort was made to ensure that the scope of businesses included in the numerator was as close as possible to the scope included in the denominator. The result of the Base Figure calculation is shown in Table 3 as follows: TABLE 3 CATEGORY OF WORK NAICS CODE 237310 CATEGORY WEIGHT 4.8% DBES 44 ALL FIRMS 169 WEIGHTED RATIO 1.3% Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction 237990 11.7% 17 88 2.3% Poured Concrete Foundation and Structure Contractors 238110 0.1% 20 381 0.0% Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors 238210 4.9% 35 1,700 0.1% Site Preparation Contractors 238910 3.7% 43 530 0.3% All Other Specialty Trade Contractors 238990 5.6% 38 722 0.3% Offices of Lawyers 541110 1.0% 3 3,554 0.0% Engineering Services 541330 43.5% 90 1,619 2.4% Testing Laboratories 541380 1.0% 14 194 0.1% Environmental Consulting Services 541620 10.6% 61 248 2.6% All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 541990 13.1% 20 384 0.7% Base Figure (i.e., Sum of Weighted Ratios for all Work Categories) 10.1% 193 RCTC FTA DBE Goal Methodology FFY 2019-FFY 2021 Page 6 of 13 Step 2: Adjusting the Base Figure Upon establishing the Base Figure, RCTC reviewed and assessed other known evidence potentially impacting the relative availability of DBEs within the market area, in accordance with prescribed narrow tailoring provisions set forth under 49 CFR Part 26.45: Step 2; DBE Goal Adjustment guidelines. Evidence considered in making an adjustment to the Base Figure included past DBE goal attainments and other evidence, as follows: A. Past DBE Goal Attainments Historical DBE participation attainments provide demonstrable evidence of DBE availability and capacity to perform on RCTC projects. The projects anticipated to be awarded during the triennial period are substantially similar to those awarded in the recent past. RCTC calculated past DBE participation attainments for the three (3) federal fiscal years, for which DBE attainment data is available. The table below reflects the demonstrated capacity of DBEs (measured by actual historical DBE participation attainments) on FTA-assisted contracts awarded by RCTC within the last three (3) federal fiscal years. TABLE 4 FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR FTA DBE PARTICIPATION % 2014/2015 8.4 % 2015/2016 7.6% 2016/2017 5.0% Median DBE Participation Within the Last Three (3) Years 7.6% The median participation for the past three years is lower than the Base Figure derived from Step 1; therefore, an adjustment to the Base Figure based on RCTC's past DBE goal attainments has been made. The adjustment is calculated by averaging the Base Figure with the median DBE Past Attainment, as shown below. Base Figure (A) 10.1 % Median DBE Attainment (B) 7.6% Adjusted Base Figure [(A+B)/2] 8.9% 194 RCTC FTA DBE Goal Methodology FFY 2019-FFY 2021 Page 7 of 13 B. Disparity Study RCTC has not conducted a disparity study nor does it possess evidence on hand of discrimination in its transportation contracting program. RCTC reviewed and evaluated disparity studies from the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), the San Diego —Imperial County Consortium, and Caltrans as part of this goal setting process. RCTC has declined to apply the results of these disparity studies to the triennial goal methodology since the nature of procurements covered under these other studies include significantly different projects and market areas from the projects anticipated for RCTC during this triennial period. For this reason, RCTC will not be making an adjustment to the base figure using evidence from the other disparity studies. RCTC will continue to review other agency disparity studies for similarities to their procurements. RCTC will also consider undergoing its own disparity study should additional FTA-funded projects be identified in the future. C. Other Available Evidence RCTC is not in possession of other information that would have an impact on the DBE goal assessment. V. PROPOSED OVERALL DBE GOAL The Final Proposed Overall DBE Goal for FFY 2019-2021 for RCTC's FTA-assisted contracts is 9%2. As a part of the prescribed goal -setting methodology, RCTC must project the percentage of its Proposed Overall DBE Goal that can be met utilizing race -neutral and race -conscious measures. Race -Conscious & Race -Neutral Projection The United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) regulations require that race -neutral methods be used to the maximum extent feasible to reach the DBE overall goal. Under the determination of the 9th circuit court in the Western States case, entities need to show the presence or absence of discrimination or its effects to use race -conscious methods. Due to the emphasis on race -neutral methods, RCTC will continue to use the race -neutral measures listed below. RCTC will carefully monitor participation during the course of the goal period. At the conclusion of each year during the goal period, RCTC will re-evaluate the effectiveness of the race -neutral methods and determine if it is necessary to institute a race -conscious portion and contract specific goals. RCTC intends to use race -neutral methods, as shown below, to meet the overall DBE goal of 9% for FFY 2019-2021 in accordance with Title 49 CFR Part 26.51. 2 Rounded to a whole number 195 RCTC FTA DBE Goal Methodology FFY 2019-FFY 2021 Page 8 of 13 RACE -CONSCIOUS & RACE -NEUTRAL PROJECTIONS DBE Adjusted Base Figure 9% Race -Conscious Component 0% Race -Neutral Component 9% VI. RACE -NEUTRAL IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES RCTC is currently implementing a number of race- and gender -neutral remedies to outreach and promote the participation of DBEs and small businesses in RCTC's FTA-assisted contracting program. RCTC plans to continue or implement the following race -neutral measures for FFY 2019-2021 and will continue to explore other options for consideration based on RCTC's success in meeting its overall DBE goals based on these efforts: • RCTC will structure and present solicitations and schedules in ways that facilitate DBE and other small business participation with prospective prime contractors. RCTC will also participate in Small Business conferences, which may include a networking component to promote teaming opportunities between prospective prime contractors and the DBE and Small Business contracting community. • RCTC will hold pre -proposal meetings, invite DBE firms, and provide for networking at these meetings. • RCTC will refer the DBE and Small Business contracting community to the SBA Bonding Assistance Program. • RCTC will carry out a communications effort to inform DBEs and other Small Businesses of opportunities that may be available. • RCTC will actively promote Small Business conferences, programs and supportive services currently offered by peer agencies which have mature DBE and Small Business Programs and are seeking increased DBE and Small Business participation in their programs as a supportive service to help develop and improve immediate and long-term business management, record keeping, and financial and accounting capability for DBEs and other small businesses. • RCTC will advise contractors about the online directory of certified DBEs, found at the California Unified Certification Program website: www.CaliforniaUCP.org • RCTC will advise the DBE and small business community to participate in Caltrans' DBE Supportive Services Program, which offers free training classes and one-on-one technical assistance. Fostering Small Business Participation RCTC has implemented several strategies to foster small business participation in its contracting process. These include the following: • In multi -year design -build contracts or other large contracts (e.g., for "megaprojects"), requiring bidders on the prime contract to specify elements of the contract or specific subcontracts that are of a size that small businesses, including DBEs, can reasonably perform. 196 RCTC FTA DBE Goal Methodology FFY 2019-FFY 2021 Page 9 of 13 • On larger prime contracts, encouraging the prime contractor to consider subcontracting opportunities of a size that small businesses, including DBEs, can reasonably perform, rather than self -performing all the work involved. • Identifying alternative acquisition strategies and structuring procurements to facilitate the ability of consortia or joint ventures consisting of small businesses, including DBEs, to compete for and perform prime contracts. • Ensuring that a reasonable number of prime contracts are of a size that small businesses, including DBEs, can reasonably perform. • Provide outreach to current RCTC contractors or past RCTC contractors who may qualify for DBE - certification by encouraging them to seek and obtain DBE -certification. VII. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND FACILITATION On April 12, 2018, RCTC issued a Public Notice on RCTC's website (Attachment 1), publishing the Draft Proposed FTA Overall DBE Goal -Setting Methodology for FFY 2019-2021. The notice informed the public that the proposed goal and rationale were available for inspection at RCTC's principal office during normal business hours for 30 days following the date of the Public Notice, and that RCTC would accept comments on the goal analysis for 30 days from the date of the Public Notice. In accordance with Public Participation Regulatory Requirements of Title 49 CFR Part 26, minority, women, local business associations, and community organizations within the market area were contacted and provided an opportunity to review the triennial goal analysis and provide input. RCTC reached out to a total of 11 local minority, women, and community business organizations to provide them information on the RCTC DBE program and specifically the Draft Proposed FTA Overall DBE Goal - Setting Methodology for FFY 2019-2021. Each organization was contacted multiple times by telephone and email. Two of the organizations participated in a phone call, as noted in Attachment 2. All comments received, and a summary of all contact made in an attempt to receive input as a part of this process can be found in Attachment 2. 197 RCTC FTA DBE Goal Methodology FFY 2019-FFY 2021 Page 10 of 13 Attachment 1: Website notification DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM The Commission strongly encourages the utilization and participation of certified DBE firms in its contracting and procurement activities. It is the Commission's policy to ensure that DBEs have an equal opportunity to receive and participate in DOT -assisted contracts. The Commission procurements will be administered without discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, or national origin. DBE PROGRAM OBJECTIVES April 12, 201S DBE LIAISON OFFICER DBE CERTIFICATION PROPOSED FTA D8E GOAL 12018118-2020121 R[VERSI DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FEDERAL TRANSJ ADMINISTRATION DBE GOAL FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2018ii 9 — 2020f21 In accordance with 49 CER Part. 26.45(g), the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), as a recipient of U.S. Department of Transportation (DDT) assistance, announces a proposed Federad Transit Administration (FTA) Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) overall goal of 9.0°% far the project period. This race -neutral goal represents the percentage of work to be performed by certified DBE firms on RCTC's FTA-assisted projects during each federal fiscal year of the project period. The methodology used to determine the proposed goal will be available for public inspection for thirty (30) days from the date of this notice,_ Monday through Thursday from B:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the following location: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street_ 3' Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Tel: (951) 787-7141 The U.S. DDT and RCTC will accept comments on this proposed goal for thirty (30) days from the date of this notice_ Written comments to the RCTC DBE Liaison Officer, Matthew Wallace, may be sent to the address above andlor emailed to mwailace!a.rctc.oro. Written comments can also be sent directly to the FTA, Massa Appleton, Civil Rights Officer, 200 W. Adams Street, Suite 320, Chicago, IL 60606. Written comments at both locations will be accepted until Tuesday, May 15, 201 B. 198 RCTC FTA DBE Goal Methodology FFY 2019-FFY 2021 Page 11 of 13 Attachment 2: Consultative Process Summary Organization Outreach Activity and Comments Greater Corona Hispanic Chamber of Commerce 121 E. 4th Street, Suite A, Corona, CA 92879 Nick Lopez, President info@GCHCC.com 951.278.4755 4/18 - Sent email 4/24- Left voicemail 4/27 - Left voicemail 4/30 - Sent follow-up email 5/4 - Left voicemail 5/7 - Sent email 5/9 - Left voicemail 5/11- Left voicemail Greater Riverside Chamber of Commerce 3985 University Avenue Riverside, CA 92501 Cindy Roth, President croth@riverside-chamber.com 951-683-7100 Ext.219 4/18 - Sent email 4/25 - Spoke to Brooke at the front desk, left voicemail for Cindy 4/27 - Left message & call back request with Assistant 4/30 - Sent follow-up email 5/4 - Spoke with Lindsay (Asst) - she will forward message to Cindy 5/7 - Sent email to Cindy & Lindsay 5/9 - Spoke with Lindsay and she said that Cindy is currently in Washington D.C. until next week. If she has any comments when she returns, she will be providing an email to set up a meeting time. High Desert Hispanic Chamber of Commerce 14286 California Avenue, Suite 104 Victorville, CA 92392 Eric J Camarena, Chair of Board (760) 241-6661 4/18 - Submitted email on website portal 4/25 - Left voicemail 4/27 - Left voicemail 4/30 - Submitted follow-up email on website portal 5/4 - Left voicemail 5/7 - Sent email 5/9 - Left voicemail 5/11 - Left voicemail Inland Empire African American Chamber 985 Kendall Drive Ste A-290 San Bernardino, CA 92407 Tammy Martin Ryles, President info@bccinlandempire.com (844) 332-2243 4/18 - Sent email 4/25 - Left voicemail 4/27 - Left voicemail for Tammy on her phone line 4/30 - Sent follow-up email 5/4 - Spoke with Tammy, she will share report with Board of Directors tonight @ meeting and will follow back up on Monday 5/7- Sent email to Tammy 5/9 - tried to leave voicemail however inbox was full. 5/11- Left voicemail 199 RCTC FTA DBE Goal Methodology FFY 2019-FFY 2021 Page 12 of 13 Organization Outreach Activity and Comments Greater Riverside Hispanic Chamber of Commerce 2023 Chicago Ave., #B-15 Riverside, CA 92507 Carmen Lainez, Vice Chair (562) 412-8214 clainez@bailhotline.net 4/18 - Sent email 4/25 - Left voicemail 4/27 - Left voicemail 4/30 - Sent follow-up email 5/4 - Left voicemail National Association of Women Business Owners - Inland Empire (NAWBO) P.O. Box 1501 Upland, CA 91785 Hilda Kennedy, President 909-915-1706 president@nawbo-ie.org 4/18 - Sent email 4/25 - Spoke to Ahmed who gave Hilda's cell phone number. Spoke to Hilda about goal methodology. She requested link to RCTC website be provided to her to share with her colleagues who would be most likely impacted. Sent email with link. 4/30 - Sent follow-up email 5/4 - Left voicemail 5/9 - Conducted consultative call with Robin Allen about RCTC Triennial Goal and Methodology. She will be reviewing the Draft RCTC Triennial Goal and Methodology and will be providing comments after she has thoroughly reviewed. During the call, she was informed about the DBE Program, race -neutral measures, how the goal is calculated, upcoming projects. National Association of Women in Construction -San Bernardino/Riverside Denise Bomhoff 909-383-9535 atdbamma@sbcglobal.net Marilyn VanTassel 909-721-8220 mvantasselg@att.net Renae Truex 909-499-5449 rtruex@smc-cpas.com 4/18 - Sent email 4/25 - Spoke with Denise about the triennial goal posted on RCTC's website. She requested a link to RCTC website to review the document. Sent email with link. 4/30 - Sent follow-up email 5/4 - Spoke with Denise. She mentioned that the organization chapter is no longer active. Ontario Hispanic Chamber of Commerce 214 S Euclid ave Ste 108 Ontario CA 91762 Martin Cueva, President 714-240-2559 (909) 983-8810 4/18 - Submitted email on website portal 4/25 - Left voicemail 4/27 - Left voicemail 4/30 - Submitted follow-up email on website portal 5/4 - Left voicemail 5/7 - Sent email via webmail 5/9 - Spoke with Martin about questions he may have about the RCTC Triennial Goal and Methodology. Due to other obligations, he has not had time to review the document. Sent Martin an email with contact information if he would like to follow-up with us later. 200 RCTC FTA DBE Goal Methodology FFY 2019-FFY 2021 Page 13 of 13 Organization Outreach Activity and Comments Southern California Black Chamber of Commerce PO BOX 1722 Duarte, CA 91009 Rich Wallace, President 888-466-7408 info@blackchamberofcommerce.org 4/18 - Sent email 4/25 - Spoke with Rich about triennial goal. He has not had a chance to review the document. Sent email with link. 4/30 - Sent follow-up email 5/4 — Attempted to leave voicemail but inbox was full. 5/7 - Sent email 5/9 - Spoke with Rich. He has reviewed the triennial goal and methodology document. He does not have any questions or feedback. WTS-Inland Empire PO Box 904 Riverside, CA 92502 Melissa Dugan, President contactwtsie@gmail.com 4/18 - Sent email 4/30 - Sent follow-up email 5/7 - Sent email *unable to locate phone number for outreach call. Riverside County Black Chamber of Commerce 2060 Chicago Ave. Ste A13 Riverside, CA 92507 Pepi Jackson, President (951) 823- 0175 x 103 pepi@riversidecountybcc.org 4/18 - Sent email 4/25 - Spoke to Bianca and left message for Pepi to call the office. Pepi called the office to receive more details about the goal methodology. Sent email with link for his review. 4/30 - Sent follow-up email. 5/4 - Spoke with Assistant in Perris Office and left message for Pepi 5/7 - Sent email 5/9 - Spoke to Pepi about the triennial goal and methodology. He has not had a chance to thoroughly review the document but would like to participate in the goal and methodology development. We have scheduled a meeting with him on Monday and provided him copy of goal methodology in meeting invite. 5/11 - Review his questions and comments. 5/14 - Conference call with Pepi. RCTC provided brief overview of federal funds flow -down and how it affects the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program. Pepi has expressed concern for providing technical assistance to the small businesses in the area. RCTC informed Pepi of business assistance classes that are available through the Small Business Administration (SBA) or other small business development centers. He expressed concern about networking with Primes, insurance and bonding requirements, and DBE certification assistance. 201 AGENDA ITEM 8H RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Jillian Guizado, Legislative Affairs Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: State and Federal Legislative Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Receive and file an update on state and federal legislation; and 2) Adopt the following bill positions: a) AB 1912 (Rodriguez) — Oppose. DISCUSSION: State Update AB 1912 (Rodriguez) —OPPOSE The Commission is a member agency in a number of Joint Powers Authorities (JPAs), including: Southern California Regional Rail Authority (Metrolink), Los Angeles -San Diego -San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency (LOSSAN), Riverside Transit Agency, to name a few. These JPAs, like most others, operate similar to other statutorily (or otherwise) created public agencies. As such, most of them contract with the California Public Employee Retirement System (CaIPERS) to provide post -employment benefits to their employees. In the rare and unfortunate event one of these JPAs' financial status became such that it could no longer cover its pension liabilities, the JPA's employees would no longer receive a pension. AB 1912 seeks to change that by requiring all JPA member agencies to amend all existing JPA agreements to assume the liability of the JPA in the event it can no longer cover its pension liabilities. In the Commission's case, if AB 1912 were to become law, the Commission would be in a position to take on the liabilities of JPAs with staffing numbers far exceeding those of the Commission. Due to deep concern over the financial liability AB 1912 poses to the Commission, as well as potential harmful impacts on the Commission's bond marketability and its credit rating, staff is recommending an oppose position on AB 1912. This position recommendation is aligned with a principle in the Commission's 2018 State and Federal Legislative Platform: Agenda Item 8H 202 1. Protect Our Authority and Revenue— Oppose legislation that restructure or interferes with governance of the Commission or other local and regional transportation agencies without the support and consent of the entity affected. Governor's May Revision As required by law, Governor Brown released his May Revision to the proposed Fiscal Year 2018/19 budget prior to the May 15 deadline. This revision reflects a total increase of $8 billion in receipts over the January proposed budget. Compared with the January proposed budget, there is an additional 2.6 percent for transportation, for a proposed transportation budget amount of $14.6 billion in FY 2018/19. Should Senate Bill 1 be repealed in November, the state's transportation budget would immediately take a multi -billion dollar hit. Most notable for the Commission and its transit operators are increases of $34 million in State Transit Assistance (STA) revenues for bus transit and $34 million in STA revenues for intercity rail. Federal Update The House of Representatives Subcommittee on Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies (THUD) of the House Committee on Appropriations marked up the FY 2019 THUD Appropriations bill on May 16. The Full Committee on Appropriations is expected to consider the bill in the third week of May. The Senate Committee on Appropriations is expected to consider its version of the THUD Appropriations bill in June. As of the current version of the House bill, funding for transportation exceeds that called out in the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act for FY 2019, which is welcome news. Staff will continue monitoring the progress of the bill until its passage. Attachment: Legislative Matrix — June 2018 Agenda Item 8H 203 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - POSITIONS ON STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION —JUNE 2018 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption AB 1189 (Garcia) Clarifying legislation that allows the Commission to implement a second self- help sales tax, subject to approval of two-thirds of the electorate in a future election. Enrolled and presented to the Governor. (September 13, 2017) SPONSOR 1/26/217 AB 91 (Cervantes) Requires Ca!trans to convert existing HOV lanes in Riverside County to operate only during hours of heavy commuter traffic; during all other times the lanes would be open to all vehicles, including those with a single occupant. Ordered to inactive file. (September 15, 2017) OPPOSE Opposition removed 5/30/17 as a result of amendments 3/8/17 AB 351 (Melendez) Proposes to bring truck weight fees back to transportation accounts. Re -referred to Committee on Transportation. (January 4, 2018) SUPPORT 3/8/17 AB 179 (Cervantes) Changes the membership of the California Transportation Commission. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (October 13, 2017) OPPOSE 4/12/2017 AB 408 (Chen) Final offer of compensation in eminent domain cases. Died prior to going to committee pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a). (March 20, 2017) OPPOSE 4/12/2017 AB 697 (Fong) Exempts private ambulances from paying tolls when responding to emergency and urgent calls. Ordered to inactive file. (September 16, 2017) OPPOSE Opposition removed 6/14/2017 as a result of amendments 4/12/2017 SB 132 (Budget and Fiscal Review Committee) Amendment to the Budget Act of 2016. Creates the Riverside County Transportation Efficiency Corridor. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (April 28, 2017) SUPPORT 4/12/2017 204 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption SB 268 (Mendoza) Changes the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority board of directors governance structure. Re -referred to Assembly Local Government Committee. (September 5, 2017) OPPOSE 5/9/2017 Staff action based on platform AB 1523 (Obernolte) Authorizes the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) to use design -build for local agencies to reconstruct the Mt. Vernon Avenue Viaduct project in San Bernardino. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (July 31, 2017) SUPPORT 5/10/2017 SB 150 (Allen) Requires the state board to update and revise greenhouse gas emission reduction targets while considering vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reductions. Requires the state board to assess current and historic VMT. Requires the state to prepare a report every four years that assesses metropolitan planning organization progress toward meeting metrics. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (October 10, 2017) OPPOSE 5/10/2017 SB 264 (Nguyen) Requires net excess toll revenue from the Orange County Transportation Authority's (OCTA) Interstate 405 Improvement Project to be allocated to OCTA and project corridor jurisdictions and requires the moneys to be spent on specified transportation improvement projects. Hearing in Transportation and Housing Committee scheduled for April 25; author cancelled hearing. (April 25, 2017) OPPOSE 5/10/2017 SB 477 (Cannella) Allows for the extension of an existing rail corridor to provide intercity rail service beyond the defined boundaries of the corridor, subject to approval by the joint powers authority board and Secretary of Transportation. Held in Assembly Appropriations Committee. (September 1, 2017) SUPPORT 5/10/2017 AB 686 (Santiago) Requires agencies to "affirmatively further fair housing" opportunity with all governmental actions. Amended and re -referred to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee. (July 17, 2017) OPPOSE 6/14/2017 SB 768 (Allen, Wiener) Extends authority to Caltrans and regional transportation agencies to enter into public private partnership agreements for transportation projects. Held in Senate Appropriations Committee. (May 25, 2017) SUPPORT 6/14/2017 H.R. 100 (Brownley) Increases the sub -allocation for local communities under the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG). Referred to House T&I subcommittee on Highways and Transit. (January 4, 2017) SUPPORT 6/14/2017 205 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption AB 115 (Ting); SB 99 (Budget) Trailer bill containing elements that will streamline transportation project delivery. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (June 27, 2017) SUPPORT 6/14/2017 Staff action based on platform AB 805 (Gonzalez Fletcher) Changes the San Diego Association of Governments board of directors governance and voting structure. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (October 11, 2017) OPPOSE 6/15/2017 Staff action based on platform AB 1069 (Low) Requires ten countywide transportation agencies, including the Commission, to regulate taxicabs. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (October 13, 2017) OPPOSE 6/28/2017 Staff action based on platform AB 1282 (Mullin) Requires the California State Transportation Agency Secretary to establish a Transportation Permitting Task Force. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (October 10, 2017) SUPPORT 7/12/2017 AB 135 (Budget) Trailer bill containing elements that allow agencies to request approval for letters of no prejudice to advance spending on SB 1 projects using local funding sources; authorizes the California State Transportation Agency to perform NEPA Assignment on transit, rail, and multimodal projects; and provides flexibility to cities and counties for adopting Local Streets and Roads project lists. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (September 16, 2017) SUPPORT 9/13/2017 Staff action based on platform H.R. 1 Amends the Internal Revenue Code to reduce tax rates and modify policies, credits, and deductions for individuals and businesses. Signed by President. (December 22, 2017) SEEK AMENDMENTS 12/13/2017 ACA 5 (Proposition 69) Assembly Constitutional Amendment passed by two-thirds of the California State Legislature and signed by Governor Brown. If passed by the voters, amends the California Constitution to protect SB 1 revenues from seizure to fund other programs and expenses. On June 5, 2018 Statewide Direct Primary Election ballot. SUPPORT 1/25/2018 California Voter Approval for Gas and Vehicle Taxes Initiative Repeals revenues raised by SB 1 that are dedicated to road repair and transportation funding. Henceforward, requires a majority vote of Californians to increase transportation revenues once passed by two-thirds of the California State Legislature. Proponents collecting signatures of registered voters. OPPOSE 1/25/2018 206 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption SCR 90 (Roth) Designates the 60/91/215 interchange in Riverside County as the Joseph Tavaglione Interchange. Passed Senate Committee on Transportation and Housing; referred to Committee on Appropriations. (May 15, 2018) SUPPORT 2/1/2018 Staff action based on platform AB 1759 (McCarty) Starting in Fiscal Yclar 2022/23, the Statc Controllcr to local Re -referred to Committee on Appropriations. (May 10, 2018) OPPOSE 3/14/2018 rcquires withhold funds SB 1 from streets and roads providcd undcr citics and countics not thcir housing Withhcld funds be meeting share of rcgional nccds. would placed i-R—a-R—ess-r-aw—QEee-wat-u,Tt+l t-14e—ne;rEe ^^ te—lae—i„ a-ge+R his--c#ee�ed compliancc. Grants the Sacramento Waterfront Parcel and the Sand Cove Parcels to the city of Sacramento as public trust lands and authorizes the City to use the lands to promote their use as public trust lands. AB 1905 (Grayson) Limits a court's ability to stop projects with lawsuits against their environmental documents from moving forward if the project is in SCAG's adopted SCS. Amended; re -referred to Assembly Committee on Natural Resources. (April 16, 2018) SUPPORT 3/14/2018 SB 1262 (Newman) Makes the Construction Manager / General Contractor (CM/GC) procurement and project delivery method a permanent tool available to Caltrans, removes the project cost minimums prescribed in the current pilot program, and eliminates the requirement for Caltrans to use its own employees or consultants to perform project design and engineering services on a CM/GC project. Senate Floor. (May 8, 2018) SUPPORT 3/14/2018 SB 1119 (Newman) Allows for the 50 percent requirement of Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funding to be spent on projects or services that benefit disadvantaged communities to be met by transit agencies spending LCTOP funding on transit fare subsidies, transit connections, and/or technology improvements that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Passed Senate Floor. In Assembly. (May 10, 2018) SUPPORT 4/11/2018 207 AGENDA ITEM 81 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: David Thomas, Toll Project Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement with the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority for the Relocation of a Brine Line for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 18-31-149-00 with the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) for the relocation of a brine line for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (91 Project) in the amount of $68,400, plus a contingency amount of $6,600, for a total amount not to exceed $75,000; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total amount not to exceed as required for the relocation. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The 91 Project (see Figure 1) required the relocation of numerous utilities in conflict with the 91 Project improvements. One such instance was the "undergrounding" of a Southern California Edison (SCE) overhead distribution line in the SR-91/I-15 interchange area. Due to various constraints and the need to proceed without causing a delay to the 91 Project, it was agreed by SAWPA that the underground portion of the SCE facility could be placed temporarily to within one foot of an existing SAWPA brine line. SAWPA agreed to accept this alignment for the SCE line provided the Commission agree to fund the relocation of the 150 foot impacted portion of the brine line at a future date. SAWPA will relocate the 150 foot impacted portion of the brine line at a cost of $68,400. Staff has included a 10 percent contingency amount of $6,600, for a total amount of $75,000. Upon execution of the agreement, work is expected to be completed within 180 days. Agenda Item 81 208 91 Project Chino Hills a Eastvale 9/ 02 `�9 2 s Q iQtt` 0 0 Norco f \\\iar:6 J¢ i Ontario Ave Project Limits Figure 1: SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project Vicinity Map RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Agreement No. 18-31-149-00 with SAWPA for the relocation of a brine line in the amount of $68,400, plus a contingency amount of $6,600, for a total amount not to exceed $75,000. Further, authorization is requested for the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission and for the Executive Director to approve contingency work up to the total amount not to exceed as required for the relocation. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2018/19 Amount: $75,000 Source of Funds: 2017 Series A Sales Tax Revenue Bonds proceeds for 91 Project completion or 2009 Measure A Western County Highway funds Budget Adjustment: No GL/Project Accounting No.: 003028 86105 00000 0000 262 3186105 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \lie4ba, Date: 05/21/2018 Agenda Item 81 209 Attachments: 1) Draft Agreement No. 18-31-149-00 2) SAWPA Brine Line Relocation Plan Agenda Item 81 210 ATTACHMENT 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BRINE LINE RELOCATION AGREEMENT WITH SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY (91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT) This Brine Line Relocation Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into as of this day of 2018 ("Effective Date"), by and between the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Commission") and the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority ("SAWPA"). The Commission and SAWPA are sometimes referred to herein individually, as "Party", and collectively, as the "Parties". RECITALS WHEREAS, the Commission has been undertaking the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project ("Project"), which involves, among other things, the relocation of utilities in conflict with the Project. WHEREAS, the Project included relocation of Southern California Edison ("SCE") overhead distribution lines with aerial and underground components pursuant to Commission Notice to Owner Number 23036, with the SCE work completed in accordance with Conceptual Plan No. 1264 ("SCE 1264 Alignment"). WHEREAS, the SCE 1264 Alignment has placed the relocated SCE facility ("Relocated SCE Facility") with a horizontal separation of less than one foot for approximately 150 linear feet along a portion of the SAWPA brine line. WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the SCE 1264 Alignment was the best alternative available to the Commission, and SAWPA agreed to accept this alignment, provided that the Commission agreed to fund relocation of the impacted portion of the brine line to increase the horizontal separation from the Relocated SCE Facility by an additional distance of at least one (1) foot. WHEREAS, SAWPA has provided evidence of its right to maintain the brine line in its current location. WHEREAS, SAWPA shall complete the brine line relocation work as specified herein, at the Commission's cost. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions contained herein, along with other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows. TERMS 1. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the date first set forth above, and shall remain in effect until completion of the Work, and final payment therefor by the Commission. 2. Brine Line Relocation Work. SAWPA has reviewed the SCE 1264 Alignment, the Relocated SCE Facility and all applicable plans, drawings and other materials, and has prepared design and cost estimates for the SAWPA brine line relocation 1 17336.02100\30572006.1 211 work. SAWPA shall relocate that 150 linear foot portion of the brine line within one (1) foot of the Relocated SCE Facility as more specifically described on Exhibit A (the "Work"). SAWPA shall conduct the Work in a good and workmanlike manner and in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules and regulations. SAWPA shall obtain any permits or other approvals required for completion of the Work. The Relocated SCE Facility shall be protected in place during the conduct of the Work. SAWPA shall complete the Work in such a manner so as not to interfere with or otherwise disturb or damage the Relocated SCE Facility. 3. Timing of Brine Line Relocation Work. SAWPA intends to commence the Work within 120 days of the Effective Date. SAWPA anticipates that the Work shall be completed within 180 days of the commencement date. Neither Party shall be responsible to the other for damages resulting from delays in the performance of obligations hereunder resulting from action of the elements, fire, flood, "Acts of God", strikes, lockouts, permit delays or any other such causes beyond said Party's reasonable control. 4. Performance of Work. A. SAWPA agrees to perform the Work with its own forces or to cause the Work to be performed by SAWPA's contractor, employed by written contract on a continuing basis to perform work of this type, and to provide and furnish all necessary labor, materials, tools, and equipment required therefore, and to prosecute said work diligently to completion. B. If applicable, use of out-of-state personnel (or personnel requiring lodging and meal "per diem" expenses) shall not be allowed without prior written authorization by the Commission's representative. Requests for such permission must be contained in SAWPA's estimate of actual and necessary relocation costs. SAWPA shall include an explanation why local employee or contract labor is not considered adequate for the relocation work proposed. Per Diem expenses shall not exceed the per diem expense amounts allowed under the California Department of Transportation's Department of Personnel Administration travel expense guidelines. 5. Payment for Work. A. The Commission shall pay all undisputed actual and necessary cost of the Work, up to Sixty Eight Thousand, Four Hundred Dollars ($68,400), within thirty (30) days after approval by the Commission of SAWPA's itemized invoice, signed by a responsible official of SAWPA's organization and prepared on SAWPA's letterhead, compiled on the basis of the actual and necessary costs and expenses incurred and charged or allocated to the Work. B. SAWPA's invoices shall include all costs incurred for (i) SAWPA staff time, (ii) equipment and materials, (iii) subcontracted HDPE services, and (v) administrative overhead costs. Any indirect or overhead costs charged to the Commission for the Work shall comply with federal requirements. C. It is understood and agreed that the Commission will not pay any voluntary upgrades to the SAWPA brine line, beyond the scope set forth in Exhibit "A". D. Not more frequently than once a month, but at least quarterly, SAWPA shall prepare and submit progress bills for costs incurred not to exceed SAWPA's recorded costs as of the billing date less estimated credits applicable to completed work, and shall submit a final bill to the Commission within thirty (30) days after completion of the Work. E. Payment not to exceed one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the estimated amount of total SAWPA's cost as shown in paragraph (A) above may be made under 2 17336.02100\30572006.1 212 the terms of this Agreement after receipt and approval by the Commission of documentation supporting the cost increase. Payment, the aggregate sum of which exceeds one hundred twenty- five percent (125%) of the estimated amount of the Commission's liability described in paragraph (A) above, may be made after receipt and approval by the Commission of documentation supporting the cost increase and after an amendment to this Agreement has been executed by the parties to this Agreement. F. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, SAWPA shall notify the Commission in advance of any costs anticipated to exceed the sum set forth in paragraph (A) above, and shall obtain Commission's prior written approval of such cost increase. G. Detailed records from which the billing is compiled shall be retained by the SAWPA for a period of three (3) years from the date of the final payment and will be available for audit by the Commission, State and/or Federal auditors. SAWPA agrees to comply with Contract Cost Principles and Procedures as set forth in 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 645. If a subsequent Commission, state and/or federal audit determines payments to be unallowable, SAWPA agrees to reimburse the Commission within thirty (30) days after receipt of the Commission billing of the disallowed payments. If a dispute arises over the need for, or the amount of, reimbursement, the Parties shall meet and confer in good faith to attempt to resolve such dispute. The obligations under this paragraph shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. 5. Indemnification. To the extent permitted by applicable law, SAWPA agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Commission, and its directors, officers, agents and employees, from every kind or character of damages, fines, penalties, losses, liabilities, expenses, demands or claims, including any and all costs and fees arising out of litigation or settlement of any claims (collectively, "Losses"), arising from or relating to the acts or omissions of SAWPA, its agents, employees, contractors or consultants in connection with this Agreement or the Work. This indemnification obligation shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. 6. Insurance. SAWPA represents and warrants that it is sufficiently insured to conduct the Work, and shall assure that all of its agents or contractors conducting the Work maintain general liability and property damage insurance in commercially reasonable amounts, as determined by SAWPA, which insurance shall be maintained at all times during the term of this Agreement. The Commission shall be added as an additional insured to such policies. 7. Prevailing Wage. SAWPA acknowledges that any Work performed its contractors is a public work under the definition of Labor Code section 1720(a) and is therefore subject to prevailing wage requirements. SAWPA shall comply with all applicable prevailing wage requirements. 8. Buy America. A. It is understood that said highway is a Federal aid highway and accordingly, 23 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 645 is hereby incorporated into this Agreement by reference; provided, however, that the provisions of any agreements entered into between the Commission and SAWPA pursuant to State law for apportioning the obligations and costs to be borne by each, or the use of accounting procedures prescribed by the applicable Federal or State regulatory body and approved by the Federal Highway Administration, shall govern in lieu of the requirements of 3 17336.02100\30572006.1 213 said 23 CFR 645. B. In addition, the provisions of 23 CFR 635.410, Buy America (BA), are also incorporated into this agreement. The BA requirements are further specified in MAP 21, section 1518; 23 CFR 635.410 requires that all manufacturing processes have occurred in the United States for steel and iron products (including the application of coatings) installed on a project receiving funding from the FHWA. C. SAWPA understands and acknowledges that the Work is subject to the requirements of the Buy America law (23 U.S.C., Section 313) and applicable regulations, including 23 CFR 635.410 and FHWA guidance. SAWPA hereby certifies that in the performance of this Agreement, for products where Buy America requirements apply, it shall use only such products for which it has received a certification from its supplier, or provider of construction services that procures the product certifying Buy America compliance. This does not include products for which waivers have been granted under 23 CFR 635.410 or other applicable provisions or excluded material cited in the Department's guidelines for the implementation of Buy America requirements for utility relocations issued on December 3, 2013. 9. Right to Terminate. If the Commission's project which precipitated this Agreement is canceled or modified so as to eliminate the necessity of Work, the Commission shall notify SAWPA in writing and the Commission reserves the right to terminate this Agreement by amendment. The amendment shall provide mutually acceptable terms and conditions for terminating the Agreement. 10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Commission and SAWPA with respect to the Work. 11. Agreement. Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this 12. Notice. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective Parties may provide in writing for this purpose: SAWPA: Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 11615 Sterling Avenue Riverside, CA 92503 Attn: Richard Haller COMMISSION: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: David Thomas Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) 4 17336.02100\30572006.1 214 hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the actual party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 13. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be construed, enforced, governed by, interpreted, and performed pursuant to the laws of the State of California. The parties hereby agree that venue for any action brought to enforce the terms of this Agreement shall be in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Riverside, California. 14. Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by the Parties. 15. Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise. 16. Cooperation. Each party shall proceed in all due diligence with any act required to be carried out hereunder. The Parties shall each execute and deliver any and all documents and perform any acts that are reasonably necessary to effectuate the provisions of this Agreement. 17. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is finally determined by a court to be invalid or unenforceable as written, the provision shall, if possible, be enforced to the extent reasonable under the circumstances and otherwise shall be deemed deleted from this Agreement. The other provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect so long as the material purposes of the Agreement and understandings of the parties are not impaired. 18. Authority to Enter Agreement. The Parties represent that they each have the requisite power and authority to conduct their business and to execute, deliver, and perform the requirements of, this Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to enter into this Agreement and bind each respective party. 19. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. [Signatures on following page] 5 17336.02100\30572006.1 215 SIGNATURE PAGE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORATION COMMISSION BRINE LINE RELOCATION AGREEMENT WITH SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY (91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT) RIVERSIDE COUNTY SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AUTHORITY By: Arne Mayer, Executive Director By: Its: APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM By: By: Best Best & Krieger LLP Counsel to the Riverside County Transportation Commission Its: 6 17336.02100\30572006.1 216 EXHIBIT "A" PLANS FOR THE WORK [attached behind this page] 7 17336.02100\30572006.1 217 ATTACHMENT 2 O I O I © I O I O , p , p O SAWPA NTS Santa Ana watershed Project Authority 11615 STERLING AVENUE RIVERSIDE, CA 92503 951-354-4220 APRIL 2018 APPROVED BY: DAVID RUHL, RE. SANTA ANA WATERSHED PROJECT AUTHORITY ENGINEERING MANAGER DATE INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE REACH 4B UPPER RELOCATION 0 MIN M ORA NO. NRRI1 I RUIN= OW OM M WPC CHM awu M VIVA NROI® M NMIPA mn N71L aolu SHEET NO. GENERAL SHEET INDEX DESCRIPTION T-1 TITLE SHEET O G-1 CIVIL C-1 GENERAL NOTES PLAN VIEW C-2 PIPE CONNECTION DETAILS UNDERGROLIMI SERVICE ALERT Santa Ana Watershed CALL: �Fire Project Authority I- 11015 SIERLNIG MERIIE 227-2600� RIIRS1511+� »�M MOB NI INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE REACH IV-B UPPER RELOCATION TITLE PAGE PROEM' NO. RE NAM sicEr Na T-1 O J z .I.NHWHJV.L.LV 218 1. 0 GENERAL NOTES LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS WERE OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS. NEITHER THE OWNER NOR CONSULTING ENGINEER ASSUMES ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES NOT SHOWN, OR NOT IN THE LOCATION SHOWN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT UTILITY UNES WHETHER SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN THAT MAY CONCERN CONSTRUCTION AC LAMES. CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE ALL EXISTING UTILMES WRHIN A FIVE FOOT RADIUS OF THE UNITS OF PROPOSED EXCAVATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MAINTENANCE ACCESS STRUCTURES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'UNDERGROUND SERVICES ALERT' (USA) AT 1-800-227-2600 FOR FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING ITEMS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE LIMITS OF WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES NECESSARY TO PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS WHICH ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE FROM DAMAGE ALL IMPROVEMENTS DAMAGED BY CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE EXPEDMOUSLY REPAIRED OR RECONSTRUCTED TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION AT THE CONTRACTOR'S DIPENSE WITHOUT ADDM ONAL COMPENSATION. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB SRE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY. THESE REQUIREMENTS SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND SHALL NOT BE UNITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE CONSULTING ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE CONSULTING ENGINEER. 5. LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING MUTES INDICATED ON DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE WATER, SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND GAS SERVICE LOCATIONS IN COORDINATION WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY All WATER AND GAS SERVICES AND EXISTING SEWER AND STORM DRAIN LATERALS PRIOR TO INSTAUJNG THE NEW STRUCTURES. 6. PIPEUNE PROFILE ELEVATIONS ARE EXPRESSED IN FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL (MSL). HORIZONTAL DISTANCES ARE IN US FEET. 7. THE CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED THAT THE WORK ON THIS PROJECT MAY INVOLVE WORKING IN A CONFINED AIR SPACE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR 'CONFINED AIR SPACE', ARTICLE 108, TRU 8 CAUFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE B. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL PERMRS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CITY OF CORONA OR THE RNERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT. 9. NOT ALL PIPE FITTINGS OR APPURTENANCES ARE CALLED OUT OR SHOWN BUT ARE REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE PIPING SYSTEM. 10. DIMENSIONED DISTANCES SHALL GOVERN OVER SCALED DISTANCES. 11. UTILIZE DIELECTRIC COUPUNGS AND SIMILAR INSULATION BETWEEN DISSIMILAR METALS, INCLUDING BETWEEN STEEL„ STAINLESS STEEL, DUCTILE IRON AND COPPER. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN SAFE AND CONTINUOUS ACCESS TO ALL BUSINESSES, RESIDENCES, AND PUBLIC FACILITIES WITH REFERENCE TO THE WATCH MANUAL ALONG THE PIPEUNE ALIGNMENT. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY MONUMENTATION AND/OR BENCH MARKS WHICH WILL BE DISTURBED OR DESTROYED BY CONSTRUCTION. SUCH POINTS SHALL BE REFERENCED AND REPLACED WITH APPROPRIATE MONUMENTATION BY A UCENSED LAND SURVEYOR OR A REGISTERED CML ENGINEER AUTHORIZED TO PRACTICE LAND SURVEYING. A CORNER RECORD OR RECORD OF SURVEY, AS APPROPRIATE, SHALL BE FILED BY THE LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OR REGISTERED CML ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY THE LAND SURVEYOR'S ACT, THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE 14. THE CONTRACTOR SFWJ_ VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL PROPERTY ONES, RIGHT OF WAY UNITS, AND EASEMENTS PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIT WORK TO WITHIN THE PERMANENT AND CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS. 15. ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS MUST BE ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER, IN WRITING, PRIOR TO THE WORK BEING DONE ANY DEVIATIONS PERFORMED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE WILL NOT BE PAID FOR AND MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE REDONE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 16. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL WORK SHOWN IN THESE DOCUMENTS IS NEW AND TO BE PERFORMED UNDER THIS CONTRACT. 17. PIPES SHALL SLOPE UNIFORMLY BETWEEN INVERT ELEVATIONS NOTED AND SHALL BE CONNECTED TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE, SMOOTH FLOW PATH. 18. CONNECTIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT CLASSES OF PIPE SHALL BE MADE WITH A CONNECTION RATED FOR THE HIGHER PRESSURE CLASS. 19. RESTORATION OF ROADWAY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT REMOVAL (TRAFFIC SIGNS, STRIPING, PAVEMENT MARKERS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, LEGENDS, CURB MARKINGS, LOOP DETECTORS, TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT, ETC.) WHICH ARE DAMAGED OR REMOVED AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENTS SWILL BE AT LEAST EQUAL TO EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING, PROTECTING AND BRACING EXISTING UTILITY POLES AND ANCHORS THAT ARE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE PIPELINE TRENCH. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UTILITY POLE OWNER AND COORDINATE ANY SPECIAL SERVICES REQUIRED BY THE UTILITY POLE OWNER DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S TRENCHING. 21. ALL CONCRETE REMOVALS SHALL BE TO THE NEAREST CONSTRUCTION, CONTROL OR EXPANSION JOINT. ONE ORN CHAD I MIME Me SANK OWN M+ S AM Mau Iwo ye suMrA aces ago Ms Nam nMnE Mr SOPA Does Ari4 IA15 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT CALL: TOLL FREE 1-NO 227-2600 Q I o I o 22. ALL BRINE UNE CONNECTION POINTS AND CRTTICAL UTILITY CROSSING POINTS SWILL BE EXPOSED AND ACCURATELY LOCATED AT THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR TO THE CONTINUATION OF WORK. 23. DURING THE PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH, ERECT, AND MAINTAIN WARNINGS SUCH AS SIGNAGE, SIGNAL BARRICADES, AND OTHER SAFETY MEASURES AS DIRECTED BY APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS, WITH REFERENCE TO THE WATCH MANUAL 24. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPEN MORE TRENCHES THAN CAN BE PROPERLY COMPLETED IN A DAYS OPERATION. ANY TRENCH UNAVOIDABLY LEFT OPEN DURING THE HOURS OF DARKNESS OR OVER A WEEKEND SHALL BE FENCED WITH A 8-FOOT CHAIN UNK FENCE AND PROPERLY LIGHTED, OR BRIDGED BY A CRY OR COUNTY, AS APPUCABLE, APPROVED TRAFFIC PLATE WITH REFERENCE TO THE WATCH MANUAL 25. A CAL/OSHA PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR TRENCHES OVER 5-FOOT IN DEPTH. 26. TRAFFIC SIGNAL FUNCTIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION; HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO GIVE 48-HOUR NOTICE PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION THAT MAY DAMAGE OR AFFECT BURIED TRAFFIC DETECTORS. 27. ALL REMOVALS IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SAW CUT ON A NEAT, STRAIGHT UNE PARALLEL TO THE PIPELINE THE CUT EDGE SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM CRUSHING AND ALL BROKEN EDGES SHALL BE RE -CUT PRIOR TO PAVING OPERATIONS. 28. DUST SHAI1 BE CONTROLLED AT ALL TIMES BY APPROVED METHODS. 29. PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AND FREE FROM DIRT AND/OR DEBRIS. THE CONTRACTOR SWILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS INCURRED IN DI!ILL l CLEANING NECESSITATED BY HIS OPERATION. 30. NOTICE IS REQUIRED FOR INSPECTION AND FIELD TIES 24-HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE OPERATION. 31. NO CHANGES SHALL BE MADE TO THIS PLAN WITHOUT THE REVIEW AND WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE OWNER OR ENGINEER. 32. ALL MATERIALS, PRODUCTS, OR OTHER ITEMS INSTALLED ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNLESS PRIOR APPROVAL IS OBTAINED. 33. ALL STATIONING IS REFERENCED TO THE CENTERUNE OF THE PIPE 34. 35. 36. 37. ALL TRENCH BACKFILLS SHALL BE TESTED AND CERTIFIED BY A SOILS ENGINEER CONTRACTOR RETAINED, SAWPA APPROVED) PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF AC OR CONCRETE. SAWPA INSPECTOR SHALL BE PRESENT FOR ALL TESTING. BACKALL SHALL BE COMPACTED PER SPEC SECTION 02220. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ALL CONDUITS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS. NEW CONDUCTORS SHALL BE PULLED WITH THE APPROPRIATE SPARES FROM PULL BOX TO PULL BOX, NEW INTERCONNECT CABLE SHALL BE PULLED FROM CONTROLLER TO CONTROLLER. ALL LOOPS SHALL BE REPLACED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF PAVEMENT REPAIR. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL LIABILITY UNTIL SIGNALS ARE IN APPROVED WORKING ORDER. ALL UTILITY SERVICES SHALL REMAIN IN SERVICE TO EACH OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES UNLESS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF SAWPA IS OBTAINED PRIOR TO ANY WORK BEING STARTED. ALL WORK INCLUDING PLACEMENT OF AC, SIDEWALK OR ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE DONE IN CONFORMITY WRH THE APPUCABLE PROVISIONS OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, 2003 EDITION UNLESS MODIFIED BY THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 38. ALL NEW PAVEMENT TYPES SHALL MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT TYPES LE RUBBER TO RUBBER, AR 4000 TO AR 4000. 39. ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AM RESIDENTS IN THE PROJECT AREA SHALL BE GIVEN ONE (1) WEEKS NOTICE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 40. ALL AC FLOATERS' (AREAS OF 38' OR LESS FROM TRENCH CUT TO THE UP OF GUTTER OR CURB FACE) SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPAVED WITH THE TRENCH. 41. ALL PAVING SHALL BE AT LANE UNE OR 4 FEET FROM THE WIVE UNE NO PAVING SHALL END IN THE WHEEL PATH OF ANY TRAVEL LANE 42. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE OUT STRUCTURE LOCATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC SECTION 01050. 43. ALL BACKFILL AND REPLACEMENT PAVING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT(S) AND AS DETAILED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. 46. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DRAINING THE SARI UNE AS NEEDED TO CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED MAINTENANCE ACCESS STRUCTURES AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 47. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING A SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PLAN AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 48. THE TERMS 'CONTRACTOR- AND 'SAWPA' SHALL BE USED INTERCHANGEABLY SINCE SAWPA IS SELF -PERFORMING THIS WORK. 49. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW BMPM TO PREVENT ANY SEDIMENT FROM REACHING THE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL AnaWatershed Project Authority MEMO EMO AVENUE IFINIIISanta AWPA M 991 � INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE REACH IV-B UPPER RELOCATION GENERAL NOTES Na NAM SMELT NO. G-1 219 0 I 0 67) n i•-•% 1 - - — A •i r APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF RELOCATION FROM STATION 102+00 TO 103+50 421A cT. Nv X/ - :,...' cow ..1,„ ; r .-"46114;4Thr-i \ \oe ti Or ,sor j 1), 0'1 r • • CONNECTIO ' Sj 4 SCE IN PLACE EXI STI Nei 1104-au_ scE co UtsfEltt-r*=;.,. , EXISTING SpiNE , „sE _ 5JJ 4. OW ti‘ +a PROPCISE RATION RAvvVvATTLEs-7 T TpdHANNEL WALL RELOC.ATION DAN DWI CRC REMARKS 121111111) in m,IRA1 MEN 1W SAWA ow core cm WM% was taro um waft IIII0110 Mt WPM eae Ana 20111 ca , • tr..; 4,1 ,Vt` t4 TO. .0sum tot Upn sera Au»p SEPARATION BETWEEU4STING HIGH -VOLTAGE SCE CSNDIBT AND THE BRINE LINE SHALL BE A MINIMUM F3-BIP STAGING ig 1' - ,§ 6 ^ n« -Wc14;! oeinuctp« titla iv.' rnAT MO; 111:r4; met,IPti tJAmiort - MAINTAIN A MIN 2-FF SEPARATION BETWEEN RELOCATED EXISTING BRINE LINE MH PIPE AND EXISTING CHANNEL WAIL CONNECTION DETAIL SEE SHEET C-2 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT CALL TOLL FREE 1-800 227-2600 Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority 11015 STERLING MAME CA 92503 EMMA 951-M-4--4220 rtli'!1t4,1la izrX, woo, 14,.,ecty tot4.5spi., Aro$9.0, ppygt»,, flIt t Iewrs At r•witrliz, 11. of Zittjgo. intf4IV rd oritqc.ve AVVII hit 114ANS DECO tivi 11 itItitt.itt tt, NUS, ...4:11TtP! INI .,11.411fi .1.t.ttlf&fiVt11 telivVitAttt,;f1 kir4"11/1 3/4,1146,041 ALI tt. Mr, tr t.t61tvik,1 incti:tvOtt "I'kll:TV4-FA! re CONSTRUCTION RECORDS INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE REACH IV-B UPPER RELOCATION PLAN VIEW MELT 90. RE PiAle 9439T to C-1 .0 220 O I O I © I O I ® I © I O I O CUT EXISTING 20" 0 PIPE AND REUSE FOR RELOCATION 2-FT USE 22.5° HDPE ELECTROFUS ION COUPLERS -•4.5-FT ALLOW SUFFICIENT LENGTH FOR HDPE COUPLER CONNECTION - EXISTING 20" 0 HDPE PIPE RELOCATED 20" 0 HDPE PIPE ENE CHO I AMMO 1: Er.A NMI Mn SM/A Ear afro rn Tom a0 K :..A M7b1® En SrWA Ew Awia >me 150-FT UNDERGROUND SEWAGE ALERT CALL: TOLL FREE 1-800 227-2600 USE 22.5° HDPE ELECTROFUSION COUPLERS ALLOW SUFFICIENT LENGTH FOR HDPE COUPLER CONNECTION anta Ana Watershed Project Authority 116155 SIEERIINC A4EM1E 9ElfP� Rl 95s.4_422020 03 CUT EXISTING 20" 0 PIPE AND REUSE FOR RELOCATION INLAND EMPIRE BRINE LINE REACH IV-B UPPER RELOCATION PIPE CONNECTION DETAILS v"oELT No. TILE Nil! MEET Na C-2 O O O 221 AGENDA ITEM 8J RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: David Thomas, Toll Project Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Change Order to Amend the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project Design -Build Contract with Skanska-Ames, a Joint Venture, for the Interstate 15/State Route 91 Express Lanes Connector Project STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Change Order No. 6 to Agreement No. 16-31-057-00 for the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project (1-15 ELP) with Skanska-Ames, a Joint Venture, (Skanska-Ames) to perform final engineering design work and limited construction within the limits of the 1-15 ELP to accommodate the Interstate 15/State Route 91 Express Lanes Connector Project (15/91 ELC) in the amount of $2,891,000, plus a contingency amount of $289,100, for a total amount not to exceed $3,180,100; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the change order amendment on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total amount not to exceed as required for the project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In April 2017 Governor Brown signed Senate Bill 132 (SB 132) which appropriated $427 million to the Riverside County Transportation Efficiency Corridor (RCTEC) for five projects. SB 132 allocated $180 million to the 15/91 ELC project. The 15/91 ELC project will provide a tolled express lanes connector between the existing 91 Express Lanes and the future I-15 Express Lanes to the north of SR-91 (Figure 1 Vicinity Map). Agenda Item 8J 222 -15/SR-91 Express Lanes Connector A Eastvale Ty giLP\ 1 Ir Norco Ht6denValley Pkwy %4111 ,,-) Corona 0• G<(‘� S 2Q�'0F 00 00 Lake Matthews Project Limits Figure 1: 15/91 Express Lanes Connector Project Vicinity Map SB 132 also statutorily created a task force to develop recommendations to accelerate project delivery of the RCTEC projects. On June 27, 2017, Governor Brown signed budget trailer bill Assembly Bill 115 (AB 115) through which the Commission received additional project delivery authority to ensure cost-effective and timely delivery of the 15/91 ELC. At its October 2017 meeting, the Commission approved an overall procurement strategy for the 15/91 ELC to secure all the services and construction needed to deliver the project. The approved strategy consists of a series of contract amendments, as permitted by AB 115, to existing 91 Project and 1-15 ELP contracts with engineering companies, contractors, toll vendors, legal, and financial advisors. DISCUSSION: At the April 12, 2017 Commission meeting, following a competitively negotiated procurement, the Commission awarded a best -value design -build contract to Skanska-Ames to design and construct the I-15 ELP in the amount of $243,900,000 plus a contingency amount of $19,512,000 for a total amount not to exceed $263,412,000. Based on the overall procurement strategy approved for the 15/91 ELC, staff supports a change order to amend the 1-15 ELP design -build contract to perform the following work needed for implementation of the 15/91 ELC project: Agenda Item 8J 223 " Final engineering design work to prepare Release for Construction (RFC) documents for median improvements near Hidden Valley Parkway; " 95 percent design documents for outside widening near Hidden Valley Parkway; " Final engineering design work to prepare RFC documents for the south toll gantry at the southern terminus of the existing direct connector between 1-15 and SR-91 express lanes; and " Construction of the south toll gantry. This effort is to perform final engineering design work and limited construction within the limits of the 1-15 ELP to accommodate the 15/91 ELC in advance of the planned overall design -build services amendment with Skanska-Ames. This effort will avoid impacts to the I-15 ELP and reduce the cost and impacts associated with performing this work at a later date. Staff negotiated Change Order No. 6 (see attachment) in the amount of $2,891,000 for this effort. The table below summarizes the status of 15/91 ELC related change orders and amendments to the Skanska-Ames contract. Skanska-Ames 15/91 ELC Related Amendments/Change Orders Status Amount Contingency Total Change Order No. 5  Early geotechnical work and staff support Commission approved on April 11, 2018 $1,790,000 $ 179,000 $ 1,969,000 Amendment No. 2  Preliminary Engineering Commission approved on May 9, 2018 4,718,800 471,200 5,190,000 Change Order No. 6  Final Design for improvements near Hidden Valley Parkway (subject of this report) For Commission approval on June 13, 2018 2,891,000 289,100 3,180,100 Totals $9,399,800 $ 939,300 $10,339,100 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 6 to amend the design -build contract between the Commission and Skanska-Ames in the amount of $2,891,000, plus a contingency amount of $289,100, for a total amount of $3,180,100. Further, authorization is requested for the Chair or Executive Director to execute the amendment on behalf of the Commission and for the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for the project. Agenda Item 8J 224 Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2018/19 Amount: $3,180,100 Source of Funds: SB 132 State Funds Budget Adjustment: No GL/Project Accounting No.: 003039 81603 00000 0000 605 3181601 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \litazif.av, Date: 05/21/2018 Attachments: 1. Detailed Vicinity Map 2. Change Order No. 6 3. Cost Breakdown Agenda Item 8J 225 LEGEND PROPOSED STRUCTURE PROPOSED ROADWAY WIDENING PROPOSED RE -STRIPING COUNLTY LINE SR-91 CIP APE ATTACHMENT 2 1-15 ELP PROJECT CHANGE ORDER CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 6 CONTRACT NO. 16-31-057-00 DATE: XX/XX/2018 SECTION I: Title: Improvements at Hidden Valley Parkway Company Name: Skanska-Ames a Joint Venture (DB Contractor) Description: 1-15 median improvements at Hidden Valley Parkway for the 15/91 Express Lanes Connector (ELC) Additions/Deletions/Modifications to Contract Document requirements: NONE Scope: DB Contractor shall provide any and all supervision, labor, equipment, materials, laboratory testing, traffic control, and other services necessary to perform the following scope of work. This Change Order Work includes the following activities for Hidden Valley Parkway median improvements required to accommodate the 15/91 Express Lanes Connector, including updates to the reports and plans to be submitted following the Notice of Design Change (NDC) process. This Change Order includes pre -Release For Construction ("RFC') design for the Hidden Valley Parkway outside widening required to accommodate the 15/91 ELC. Exhibit A depicts the conceptual design for the Hidden Valley Parkway Widening work. This Change Order includes the work to obtain Commission and Department approval on a RFC package for the south toll gantry. Exhibit B depicts the conceptual layout for the south toll gantry. This Change Order includes the construction of the south toll gantry which must be completed by March 1, 2019. This Change Order compensates DB Contractor for all cost and time related impacts due to this change. Task 1 Project Management 1.1 General Work Management DB Contractor shall develop, implement and maintain the project management organization and systems that effectively manage all elements of this Change Order. DB Contractor shall follow the management effort as established in the Project Management Plan. Progress Reports and invoices for the work associated with this Change Order shall be kept separate from other work performed under the Contract. Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 1-15 ELP Design -Build Contract Page 1 of 9 Change Order Number 6 227 1.2 Quality Program DB Contractor is solely responsible for performance and documentation of the quality of all components of the work identified under this Change Order. DB Contractor shall maintain its own internal quality control staff and contract for all quality assurance services in the same manner as required for the Project under the Contract. 1.3Governmental Approvals DB Contractor is responsible for obtaining necessary Encroachment Permits from the Department to perform engineering tasks under this Change Order, including land survey, geotechnical investigations, and utility potholing. DB Contractor is responsible for preparing and obtaining approval for traffic control plans and providing traffic control as necessary to perform land survey, geotechnical investigations, and utility potholing. 1.4Change Management (SAJV Oversight/Support) DB Contractor will provide additional management staff to manage the work associated with this change to avoid management impacts to the 1-15 Express Lanes Project. Contract Change Order # 5 covers management staff to June 2018, and Amendment 2 covers management staff through February 2019. This task will cover management staff through April 2019 (2 additional months). Task 2 Coordination 2.1 Environmental DB Contractor shall ensure that the median design under this Change Order complies with the environmental commitments reflected in the 1-15 Final Environmental Document and all other applicable Governmental Approvals. 2.2 Roadway Design in Support of Cost Estimating DB Contractor shall provide an estimating roadway plans submittal 12 weeks after Notice to Proceed ("NTP"). The contents of this submittal could be the intermediate design package or a progress submittal that include sufficient information and physical scope defined for quantity take -offs and estimating purposes. 2.3Toll System Coordination DB Contractor shall coordinate with the Toll System Provider ("TSP") to determine location and sizing of toll related equipment for cost estimating purposes. 2.4 Utility Coordination Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 1-15 ELP Design -Build Contract Page 2 of 9 Change Order Number 6 228 DB Contractor shall coordinate with Utility Owners to prepare existing Utility mapping and identify potential Utility conflicts for purposes of the design and construction of this Change Order. DB Contractor shall coordinate with respective Utility Owners to pothole their facilities and positively identify Utility conflicts and show existing and proposed utility relocations on the utility plans which will be prepared and submitted per Task 6 of this Change Order. Task 3 Geotechnical DB Contractor shall perform all inspections and examinations of the Hidden Valley Parkway Site and surrounding locations, geotechnical studies, research, and analyses, and other appropriate activities sufficient to effectively determine and understand the existing surface and subsurface conditions to be used by DB Contractor to carry out the design. DB Contractor shall ensure the inspections, examinations, studies, and analyses are both thorough and complete, to provide accurate information for the design of roadways, embankments, pavements, foundations, structures, and other facilities that result in a design that is safe and meets all Contract requirements. 3.1 Foundation Report DB Contractor shall prepare and submit to RCTC a preliminary foundation report for each new bridge and nonstandard wall listed under Task 5 of this Change Order for inclusion with the structure type selection submittals described in Task 5. DB Contractor shall prepare and submit to RCTC and to the Department, for its approval, the final foundation reports for each new bridge and nonstandard wall listed under Task 5. 3.2 Log of Test Borings ("LOTBs") DB Contractor shall prepare LOTB sheets and include them in the final foundation reports submitted under Task 3.1 of this Change Order. 3.3 Pavement Structural Sections DB Contractor shall perform field work to develop ramp pavement structural section recommendations for the Hidden Valley Parkway on- and off -ramps for approval by RCTC. RCTC will provide DB Contractor with traffic indexes required for pavement design and RCTC will perform all Life Cycle Cost Analysis required for pavement design and acceptance by the Department. Approved pavement sections to be provided to DB contractor prior to final design submittal. Task 4 Surveying 4.1 Design Survey Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 1-15 ELP Design -Build Contract Page 3 of 9 Change Order Number 6 229 DB Contractor shall provide accurate and consistent land surveying and mapping necessary to support design. DB Contractor shall review existing survey data and determine the requirements for updating or extending the existing survey and mapping data. DB Contractor is responsible for the precision, accuracy, and comprehensiveness of all survey and mapping. DB Contractor shall submit design survey data to RCTC. Task 5 Structures 5.1 Structures Type Selection DB Contractor shall prepare and submit to RCTC structure type selection reports in accordance with TP Section 14.3.1.1 (Structure Type Selection Submittal) DB Contractor shall hold over -the -shoulder review with RCTC two weeks prior to submitting the reports to RCTC and shall address RCTC's comments prior to submitting the reports to the Department. Structure type selection submittals will be required for all bridges and nonstandard walls, including the following: n Corona Avenue Undercrossing Widening n RW#7 — Retaining Wall Below Hidden Valley Parkway n RW#8 - Retaining Wall along Hidden Valley Parkway On -ramp 5.2Structures Design DB Contractor shall develop detailed pre -RFC design for the structures listed under Task 5.1 including the Intermediate Design Package and draft Final Design Package submittals. The draft Final Design Package shall follow the requirements of the Final Design Package per TP Sections 3.3.1.4 and 3.3.3.4. Corona Avenue Undercrossing design should accommodate a soundwall with a height of 14' measured from the bridge deck. Task 6 Civil Design 6.1 Hidden Valley Parkway Median Improvements DB Contractor shall revise the median design in the vicinity of Hidden Valley Parkway to accommodate the 15/91 Express Lanes Connector. DB Contractor shall update reports and plans per the Notice of Design Change process. 6.2Hidden Valley Parkway Outside Widening 6.2.1 Storm Water Data Report ("SWDR") Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 1-15 ELP Design -Build Contract Page 4 of 9 Change Order Number 6 230 DB Contractor shall amend the ELP SWDR for the Hidden Valley Parkway outside widening for review by the Department. DB Contractor shall identify the new impervious surface area and identify Best Management Practices. 6.2.2 Stage Construction and Maintenance of Traffic Analysis DB Contractor shall develop ELC and ELP interface plan to determine how the ELP delivery will interface with the ELC construction, including construction access. 6.2.3 Roadway Design DB Contractor shall develop detailed pre -RFC design for the outside widening at Hidden Valley Parkway required to accommodate the 15/91 ELC. The following design sheets will be included with an Intermediate Design Package and draft Final Design Package submittal. The draft Final Design Package shall follow the requirements of the Final Design Package per TP Sections 3.3.1.4 and 3.3.3.4. 6.2.4 Typical Sections 6.2.5 Roadway Layout Sheets 6.2.6 Profile Sheets 6.2.7 Construction Details 6.2.8 Contour Grading Sheets 6.2.9 Drainage Design Sheets 6.2.9.1 Drainage Plan 6.2.9.2 Drainage Profile 6.2.9.3 Drainage Details 6.2.10 Utility Sheets 6.2.11 Construction Area Signs 6.2.12 Stage Construction/Traffic Handling 6.2.13 Pavement Delineation and Sign 6.2.14 Landscaping Sheets 6.2.14.1 Plant List 6.2.14.2 Planting Plan 6.2.14.3 Irrigation Removals and Construction 6.2.15 Electrical Sheets 6.2.16 RW#7 — Retaining Wall Below Hidden Valley Parkway 6.2.17 RW#8 - Retaining Wall along Hidden Valley Parkway On -ramp 6.3South Toll Gantry Design DB Contractor shall design the south toll gantry in accordance with requirements provided by the TSP and submit the following design packages for review and approval: Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 1-15 ELP Design -Build Contract Page 5 of 9 Change Order Number 6 231 n Intermediate Design Package n Final Design Package n Release for Construction Package DB Contractor shall obtain RFC approval from RCTC, TSP, and the Department by September 28, 2018. DB Contractor shall design the median improvements required to accommodate the south toll gantry, including updates to the reports and plans to be submitted following the NDC process. Task 7 South Toll Gantry Construction 7.1 Furnish Toll Gantry and associated hardware DB Contractor shall furnish toll gantry equipment and associated hardware required to complete package turnover to TSP. 7.2Construct Toll Gantry foundation, pads, and conduit/conductor DB Contractor shall construct the foundation for the toll gantry, concrete pads for associated cabinets, place conduit/conductor with full connections (including power) for turnover to TSP in accordance with the TSP's requirements. 7.3 Erect Gantry and wiring DB Contractor shall erect the toll gantry, cabinets, and terminate wires in accordance with TSP requirements. Closures DB Contractor will be allowed to close the existing EB 91- SB 15 Connector and NB 15 — WB 91 Connector from 8:00 pm to 4:00 am. DB Contractor will be allowed to close the existing NB 15 — WB 91 Connector from 7:00 pm to 4:00 am on 3 nights to allow for pavement panel replacement. SECTION II: Change Order Cost increase decrease none Total Change Order Cost shall not exceed $2,891,000.00 SECTION III: Time Impact Riverside County Transportation Commission 1-15 ELP Design -Build Contract Page 6 of 9 Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 Change Order Number 6 232 The status of all Completion Milestones is: 0 Days (No Adjustment) SECTION IV: CHANGE REQUESTED BY: RCTC ❑x DB CONTRACTOR ❑ SECTION V: Certification and Other Acknowledgments I, , the Authorized Representative of DB Contractor, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the above four sections represent a true, accurate and complete summary of all aspects of this Change Order, and that (a) the amount of time and/or compensation requested will be justified as to entitlement and amount, (b) the amount of time and/or compensation requested will include all known and anticipated impacts or amounts, direct, indirect and consequential, which may be incurred as a result of the event, occurrence or matter giving rise to the proposed change (and includes all Subcontractor and Supplier amounts), and (c) the cost and pricing data forming the basis for this Change Order is complete, accurate and current, with specific reference to the California False Claims Act (Government Code section 1250 et seq.) and the U.S. False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. section 3729 et seq.). It is understood and agreed that this Change Order shall not alter or change, in any way, the force and effect of the Contract Documents, including any previous amendment(s) thereto, except insofar as the same is expressly altered and amended by this Change Order. This Change Order supersedes all prior commitments, negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements or understanding applicable to the issues addressed herein. No deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements, whether oral or written, other than the Agreement, as amended in accordance with its terms. This Change Order is binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, each of the parties and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, DB Contractor, intending to be legally bound, has executed this Change Order as of the date below. DB Contractor: Skanska-Ames a Joint Venture By: Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 1-15 ELP Design -Build Contract Page 7 of 9 Change Order Number 6 233 Name: Title: Dated as of: Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 1-15 ELP Design -Build Contract Page 8 of 9 Change Order Number 6 234 SECTION VI (Reviewed and recommended agreed by RCTC Project Manager): By: Name: Title: Dated as of: Comments: SECTION VII (Agreed by RCTC's Authorized Representative): IN WITNESS WHEREOF, RCTC, intending to be legally bound, has executed this Change Order as of the date first written above. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: Name: Title: Dated as of: By: Name: Title: Dated as of: Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 1-15 ELP Design -Build Contract Page 9 of 9 Change Order Number 6 235 EXHIBIT A -- (0(0()-6 EXH I BIT A -CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AT 14IDDEN VALLE111 "IP1 I ui , 11 1I1t k L ib rr M4 BUF BUFFER GP GENERAL PURPOSE LANE EL EXPRESS LANE AUX AUXILIARY LANE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL Exist LANE --► DIRECTION OF TRAVEL NEW LANE ' ' ' RETAINING WALL BUFFER ' CONCRETE BARRIER PROPOSED ELC STRUCTURE PROPOSED ELC ROADWAY WIDENING - PROPOSED ELC RE -STRIPING SR- 91 C I P APE 1— 15 /Z"i R — 9 1 "_' ASS LAmmE Gu N E uR PROJECT6r�'I"IDDEN mm VALLEY PAR'Mm"WAY WIDENiNG a 19 a%h Af%& MA I T zQ18 x�X x �I I � x III ASPH v asP x�x x�x x-- x \_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a - a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -----►GP -- �_ - x III �, II x II 237 EXHIBIT B 238 CCO=6 Exhibit=B - Conceg)tual Design/MOT for New South Gantry 103.0' Rt "I-15" +93 "I-1511 +00 END Temp RAILING (TYPE K) INSTALL Temp SIGN, FSBT 138"x54" 10" PRIMARY TEXT 91.0'Rt "I-15" +93 G" SUPPLEMENTARY TEXT Beg Temp RAILING (TYPE K) FAIT 9s Magnolia Ave RIGHT 2 LAHES 12.. ... p 237 [TYPE RAILING 2 V � 1 w �® Replace pavement to track of temporary concrete barrier (T width ) I-15 2 CL 2 2'BUFFER 1 1 2' 16 12' ill 11 ' EL G GP LANE r �l ]J�EL CHANNELI2ERJ i �CHANNELIZER Exist. Temp SIGN; FNBT TO REMAIN Temp RAILING i X-Jemp (TYPEK} 5 W TYPE K} Exist MEDIAN .._ .............. BARRIER STA 2156+00 FROM SAJV 5/9/18 DRAFT FOR REFERENCE ONLY (STAGE 2 PHASE 1) TRAFFIC HANDLING FOR TOLL GANTRY AT STA 2156+00 239 ATTACHMENT 3 SKANSKA anska-Ames 1801 California Ave Ames Construction Corona, CA 92881 CCO #6 Cost Breakdown - FINAL Project Name: 1-15 Express Lanes Project Number: 16-31-057-00 Crow Job Number: 098-020 5/9/2018 Owner / Agency: RCTC Unit Price Units Total Desian Aztec $ 1,918,686.02 1 $ 1,918,686.02 SAJV Traffic Control HVP - For HVP Outside Survey (Day) For S. Gantry Survey (Night) $ 1,500.00 15 $ 22,500.00 $ 1,600.00 7 $ 11,200.00 SAJV City Permits South Toll Gantry Construction South Toll Gantry EL Closure - N-W - Construction South Toll Gantry EL Closure - E-S - Construction South Toll Gantry EL Closure - N-W - Design South Toll Gantry EL Closure - E-S - Design Design Management Risk $ - 1 $ - $ 667,032.91 1 $ 667,032.91 $ 1,266.67 25 $ 31,666.75 $ 4,400.00 8 $ 35,200.00 $ 1,266.67 5 $ 6,333.35 $ 4,400.00 2 $ 8,800.00 $ 149,335.51 1 $ 149,335.51 $ 40,000.00 1 $ 40,000.00 Total SAJV assumes existing ETTM SCE cabinet has enough capacity on line side to only $ 2,890,754.54 modify/upgrade cabinet . No work on line side of cabinet included in SAJV price. Assumes closures identified will be considered permitted closures 240 Performed by Date AGENDA ITEM 8K RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: David Thomas, Toll Project Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Cooperative Agreement with the California Department of Transportation for the 15/91 Express Lanes Connector Project Design -Build Phase STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 18-31-145-00 with California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for enhanced oversight and construction inspection services in support of the Interstate 15/State Route 91 Express Lanes Connector Project (15/91 ELC) in the amount of $7,870,485 plus a contingency amount of $787,015, for a total amount not to exceed $8,657,500; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total amount not to exceed as required for the project; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve future non -funding amendments to this agreement. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The 15/91 ELC will provide a tolled express lanes connector between the existing 91 Express Lanes and the future 1-15 Express Lanes to the north of SR-91 (Figure 1 Vicinity Map). Agenda Item 8K 241 Project Limits Figure 1: 15/91 Express Lanes Connector Project Vicinity Map Since February 2018, staff has been working closely with Caltrans to develop a design -build cooperative agreement. This agreement allows the Commission to make improvements to 1-15 and SR-91 and assigns responsibilities between Caltrans and the Commission during the design and construction of the 15/91 ELC project. Since this project will be delivered using the design - build authority provided by AB 401, this agreement establishes the level of effort for Caltrans enhanced oversight and construction inspection to be paid by the Commission. These Caltrans services will be paid with state SB 132 funds. DISCUSSION: The costs associated with this cooperative agreement cover the cost of Caltrans' personnel. Staff negotiated a fair price for Caltrans services of $7,870,485, which includes approximately $2.4 million in enhanced oversight services, $4.9 million in construction inspection services, and $583,000 in Caltrans-controlled contingency. Enhanced oversight refers to Caltrans staff or its consultants, over and above normally provided oversight, who are dedicated to the project delivery that the Commission will fund. These services include dedicated management support throughout the life of the project, the development of the technical provisions included in the design -build contract amendment, the design development, and approval of the release for construction design. The construction inspection services include independent quality assurance inspection and material source inspection consistent with the requirements as defined in AB 401. A Caltrans controlled contingency amount of $583,000 is included in the base Caltrans Agenda Item 8K 242 agreement enabling Caltrans to quickly adjust to changes in the level of services required or to pay for future Caltrans' compensation increases to employees above estimates during the duration of the contract. Under the terms of the agreement, prior to September 1 of each year starting in 2018, staff from the Commission and Caltrans will review the Caltrans proposed staffing plan for the upcoming fiscal year and adjust resources and funds accordingly to meet project needs. If the changes in resource levels are due to project scope changes, the Executive Director or designee will release Commission -authorized contingency to cover the expenditures. The Commission -authorized contingency will also cover delivery risks such as delays in the project. A separate amendment to the previously -approved 1-15 Express Lanes project toll facilities agreement to include the 15/91 ELC project, is under development that will assign the responsibilities of Caltrans and the Commission during the operations and maintenance phase. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the design -build agreement between the Commission and Caltrans in the amount of $7,870,485, plus a contingency amount of $787,015, for a total amount of $8,657,500. Further, authorization is requested for the Chair or Executive Director to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission, for the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for the project, and for the Executive Director or designee to approve future non -funding amendments to this agreement. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2018/19 Amount: $2,000,000 N/A FY 2019/2020+ $6,657,500 No Source of Funds: SB 132 State Funds Budget Adjustment: N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 003039 81602 00000 0000 605 3181601 Fiscal Procedures Approved: �� Date: 05/21/2018 Attachment: Draft Agreement No. 18-31-145-00 with Caltrans Agenda Item 8K 243 ATTACHMENT 1 District Agreement 08-1679 DRAFT NO.4 — 5/9/18 08-RIV-15-41.5/43.4 08-RIV-91- 6.6/8.1 12-ORA-91-18.0 EA: 08-OF543 District Agreement 08-1679 Project Number 0817000239 COMMISSION Agreement 18-31-145-00 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN -BUILD OF THE INTERSTATE 15/ STATE ROUTE 91 EXPRESS LANE CONNECTOR (ELC) This AGREEMENT, entered into effective on , 2018, is between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as "STATE," and the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, referred to herein as "COMMISSION." RECITALS 1. STATE and COMMISSION (collectively referred to as "PARTIES" and each singularly referred to as "PARTY"), pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 114 and 130, are authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for potential improvements to the State Highway System (SHS) within the Counties of Riverside and Orange. 2. STATE is a public agency authorized under sections 90, 91.2, 100.1, 116 and 143 of the Streets and Highways Code; section 14030 of the Government Code as well as section 6820 et. seq. of the Public Contract Code to take steps to relieve congestion on California transportation systems, including the Interstate 15 (I-15) corridor in the County of Riverside and the State Route (SR) 91 corridor in the County of Riverside and the County of Orange, through DESIGN -BUILD delivery. 3. COMMISSION is a public agency authorized under sections 130050, 130058, 130240, et. seq. and 240202 of the Public Utilities Code as well as section 6820, et. seq. of the Public Contract Code and AB 115 (defined below) to take steps to relieve congestion on California transportation systems, including the I-15 corridor in the County of Riverside and SR-91 corridor in the County of Riverside and the County of Orange through DESIGN -BUILD delivery. 4. The PROJECT to be covered under this AGREEMENT is intended to include the "TOLL FACILITY" and "NON -TOLL PROJECT FACILITIES," as defined below, and as described and depicted in the attached Exhibit A. 17336.00034\30607232.5 1 244 District Agreement 08-1679 Nothing in this AGREEMENT is intended to commit COMMISSION or STATE to completing the PROJECT, as identified in Exhibit A, or any other improvements shown in Exhibit A. Instead, this AGREEMENT is intended to recite the financial OBLIGATIONS and other responsibilities of the respective PARTIES in the event that the proposed PROJECT is approved. 5. STATE and COMMISSION previously entered into that certain Cooperative Agreement for Design -Build of the 91 Toll Facility and Corridor Improvement Project ("91 CIP"), and that certain Cooperative Agreement for Design -Build of the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project (1-15 Project"), pursuant to which COMMISSION procured various contracts for the 91 CIP and the I-15 Project, all in accordance with applicable law and STATE STANDARDS. 6. Pursuant to Section 26(b) of AB 115 (Chapter 20, Statutes of 2017) ("AB 115"), COMMISSION is authorized, at its option, to amend or change existing contracts for the 91 CIP or the I-15 Project to include the PROJECT, with the concurrence of STATE, and upon finding such option to be a cost-effective method to accelerate the delivery of the PROJECT. 7. STATE and COMMISSION agree that COMMISSION will procure and administer contract(s) for project management, planning, design, right-of-way, financing, construction management and other related services, guidelines, toll system integration, toll system operations and maintenance, and a DESIGN -BUILD contract. All responsibilities assigned in this AGREEMENT to complete the following PROJECT components will be referred to hereinafter as OBLIGATIONS. Such procurement may be by amendments to existing contracts for the 91 CIP or the I-15 Project, in accordance with AB 115. 8. Pursuant to Public Contract Code section 6821 (b), the PARTIES desire to enter into this AGREEMENT which sets forth the roles and responsibilities of the PARTIES as they relate to the design and construction of the PROJECT. 9. The PROJECT is included in the class of the DESIGN -BUILD projects identified in Public Contract Code section 6821(b), and is the project identified in AB 115. 10. STATE recognizes that COMMISSION has, prior to the effective date of this AGREEMENT, selected and retained certain consultants to work on the PROJECT. 11. COMMISSION, as part of its role in planning and developing regional transportation facilities and in order to bring about the earliest completion of studies, design, and potential construction of the PROJECT, has determined that the PROJECT, if constructed, will be implemented using a DESIGN -BUILD approach in accordance with section 6820, et seq. of the Public Contracts Code, and COMMISSION, as a county transportation commission established under Section 130050 of the Public Utilities Code, falls within the definition of a "regional transportation agency" authorized to utilize DESIGN -BUILD under section 6820, et. seq. of the Public Contract Code. In addition, COMMISSION is authorized to procure the DESIGN- 17336.00034\30607232.5 2 245 District Agreement 08-1679 BUILD contractor for PROJECT, as well as other contracts for PROJECT, through amendments or changes to existing contracts for the 91 CIP or the I-15 Project, as authorized under AB 115. 12. The DESIGN -BUILD procurement method is a key delivery component by providing for schedule acceleration, innovation, risk transfer, cost certainty and other anticipated benefits. STATE and COMMISSION agree that DESIGN -BUILD is the method of procurement to be used for implementation of the PROJECT, and that the procurement may be accomplished pursuant to amendments or changes to the existing DESIGN - BUILD contract for the I-15 Project. 13. STATE and COMMISSION will define the terms and conditions under which PROJECT is to be developed, designed, and constructed consistent with STATE'S technical and legal standards, policies and procedures for implementation of DESIGN - BUILD projects on the SHS, as the same may be modified by the PARTIES, and such standards, and modifications thereto, will be reflected in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 14. STATE and COMMISSION desire to provide efficient and cost-effective implementation of PROJECT, and will mutually establish PROJECT timelines and schedules related to review and/or concurrence with and/or approval of PROJECT submittals and documents by STATE. Such timelines, schedules, submittal requirements and standards for review by STATE will be reflected in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. STATE, in carrying out its role under this AGREEMENT, agrees, as further set forth herein, that it will be required to provide its review, comments, non - concurrence, concurrence and/or approval of PROJECT submittals and documents in a timely manner, in accordance with agreed upon PROJECT timelines and schedules. 15. COMMISSION will, pursuant to the legislative authority cited above, award, and administer the DESIGN -BUILD contract. STATE shall not be considered to be in privity with the DESIGN -BUILDER and the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS shall reflect the fact that no contractual relationship is to be created between the DESIGN - BUILDER and the STATE. 16. The terms of this AGREEMENT shall supersede any inconsistent terms of any prior Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or agreement relating to the PROJECT with the exception of the "Value Pricing Pilot Program Agreement" dated July 17, 2009 entered into between the STATE, the COMMISSION, and the Federal Highway Administration, the TOLL FACILITY Agreement for the PROJECT, and any other agreement between or among the COMMISSION and the Federal Highway Administration or the U.S. Department of Transportation. 17. STATE and COMMISSION intend to define herein the terms and conditions under which PROJECT is to be developed, designed, and constructed. This AGREEMENT shall not define the terms and conditions of operations or handback of the facility to the STATE. 17336.00034\30607232.5 3 246 District Agreement 08-1679 18. STATE and COMMISSION agree and understand that, upon completion of the PROJECT, COMMISSION shall, maintain and operate the TOLL FACILITY subject to the terms and conditions contained within that separate TOLL FACILITY Agreement No. 17-31-002-00, entered into between the PARTIES, as the same shall be amended to address inclusion of the PROJECT. 19. STATE and COMMISSION agree and understand that, upon acceptance of the PROJECT FACILITIES by STATE such facilities shall become part of the SHS and the NON -TOLL PROJECT FACILITIES shall be operated and maintained by STATE, except for those facilities that would be operated and maintained by other agencies. 20. Per Senate Bill 132, amendment to Budget Act of 2016, 2660-110-0042, for local assistance of the Riverside County Transportation Efficiency Corridor, and in accordance with that certain Master Agreement No. 08-1659 between COMMISSION and STATE, funds from the State Highway Account shall be made available for the PROJECT in the amount of $180,000,000 ("SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS"), as shown in the attached Exhibit B, and as further set forth herein. 21. The total PROJECT cost estimate, including funding sources and allocations, is shown on the FUNDING SUMMARY attached hereto and made a part of this AGREEMENT. COMMISSION is the only SPONSOR for PROJECT, with funding to be provided from SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS. DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this AGREEMENT, the following terms shall have the meanings hereinafter provided: 22. AB 115 AMENDMENT — As used herein, the term "AB 115 AMENDMENT" shall mean and refer to any amendment or change order to the to the existing DESIGN - BUILD contract for the I-15 Project entered into between COMMISSION and Skanska- Ames Joint Venture ("SAJV"), dated as of April 12, 2017, as amended, to incorporate the PROJECT. 23. BETTERMENTS - As used herein, the term "BETTERMENTS" shall mean and refer to any improvements which are not part of the PROJECT scope and which are requested by STATE for inclusion as part of PROJECT, and which are to be paid for solely by STATE. Safety Standards defined as A CHANGE IN LAW shall not constitute a BETTERMENT, unless the cost of such a change is attributable to a BETTERMENT. If mutually agreed to by both PARTIES, COMMISSION agrees that BETTERMENTS will be included in PROJECT as requested by STATE. 24. CHANGE IN LAW — As used herein, the term "CHANGE IN LAW" shall mean (a) the adoption of any Law of the State on or before May 10, 2018 (b) any change in any Law of the State or in the interpretation or application thereof by any governmental entity, excluding FHWA and STATE, on or before May 10, 2018; (c) any change in 17336.00034\30607232.5 4 247 District Agreement 08-1679 the ADJUSTMENT STANDARDS applicable to a UTILITY ADJUSTMENT on or before May 10, 2018; or (d) changes in Safety Standards that apply to the PROJECT; in each case that is materially inconsistent with the Laws, or interpretations thereof, or ADJUSTMENT STANDARDS, respectively, in effect May 10, 2018. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a CHANGE IN LAW does not include the following: (i) any change in or a new Law of the State passed or adopted but which is not effective by May 10, 2018; (ii) any change in the standards that qualifies as a Betterment; (iii) any change in State labor Laws; or (iv) any change in State tax Laws of general application. 25. COMPLETION OF WORK — As used herein, the term "COMPLETION OF WORK," shall mean that the PARTIES have met all scope, cost, and schedule commitments included in this AGREEMENT and have signed a COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CLOSURE STATEMENT. 26. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES — As used herein, the term "CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES" as specified in Streets and Highways Code section 91.2(a) includes, but is not limited to, material source testing, certification testing, surveying, monitoring of environmental compliance, independent quality control testing and inspection, and quality assurance audits. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES does not include surveying work performed as part of the DESIGN -BUILD contract. 27. CONSTRUCTION WORK ZONE. As used herein, the term "CONSTRUCTION WORK ZONE" shall mean the portion of the PROJECT SHS RIGHT OF WAY in which construction equipment or material is present or temporary traffic control devices, for the purpose of construction, are in place. 28. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS — As used herein, the term "CONTRACT DOCUMENTS" shall mean and refer to the set of contractually binding documents between COMMISSION and its DESIGN -BUILDER, as approved by STATE and, as may be required, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). This term may include an AB 115 AMENDMENT if selected as the method of DESIGN -BUILD procurement for PROJECT. 29. CONTRACT INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE TESTING - As used herein, the term "CONTRACT INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE TESTING" shall mean and refer to the activities that are an unaffiliated, unbiased and independent evaluation of all the sampling and testing procedures used on PROJECT to accept the DESIGN- BUILDER's work. 30. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CLOSURE STATEMENT — As used herein, the term "COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CLOSURE STATEMENT" shall mean and refer to the document that verifies the completion of all scope, cost, and schedule commitments included in this AGREEMENT. A sample document is attached hereto as Exhibit G. 17336.00034\30607232.5 5 248 District Agreement 08-1679 31. DESIGN -BUILD - As used herein, the term "DESIGN -BUILD" shall mean and refer to a procurement process in which both the final design and construction of a project are procured from a single entity. The term procurement, as used in this definition, may mean and refer to an AB 115 AMENDMENT. 32. DESIGN -BUILDER - The contractor selected by COMMISSION pursuant to any legal procurement process identified herein to deliver the final design and construction for PROJECT, and who executes the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 33. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS — As used herein, the term "ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS" shall mean and refer to the final, adopted Revalidation of the 91 CIP for the PROJECT, or any other final environmental approval for the PROJECT, and any related Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and all supporting environmental documentation. 34. FHWA STANDARDS — As used herein, the term "FHWA STANDARDS" shall mean and refer to FHWA manuals, technical memoranda, standards, guidelines, and modifications to such standards, and which are in effect on or before May 10, 2018. 35. HM-1 — As used herein, the term "HM-l" shall mean and refer to hazardous material (including, but not limited to, hazardous waste) that may require removal and disposal pursuant to federal or state law whether it is disturbed by PROJECT or not. 36. HM-2 — As used herein, the term "HM-2" shall mean and refer to hazardous material (including, but not limited to, hazardous waste) that may require removal and disposal pursuant to federal or state law only if disturbed by PROJECT. 37. HM MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES — Management activities related to either HM-1 or HM-2 including, without limitation, any necessary manifest requirements and disposal facility designations. 38. OWNER VERIFICATION - As used herein, the term "OWNER VERIFICATION" shall mean and refer to work performed by COMMISSION and STATE to verify the DESIGN-BUILDER's compliance with the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 39. NON -TOLL PROJECT FACILITIES — As used herein, the term "NON -TOLL" or "NON -TOLL PROJECT FACILITIES" shall mean and refer to the Interstate 15 or State Route 91 general purpose lane improvements and any PROJECT related corridor improvements not part of the TOLL FACILITY, as depicted in Exhibit A. 40. OBLIGATIONS — All responsibilities included in this AGREEMENT. 41. PROJECT — As used herein, the term "PROJECT" shall mean and refer to the TOLL FACILITY and NON -TOLL PROJECT FACILITIES, as those terms are defined herein, and as further described and depicted in Exhibit A. 42. PROJECT SHS RIGHT OF WAY — As used herein, the term "PROJECT SHS RIGHT OF WAY" shall mean and refer to the right of way covered under the STATE issued 17336.00034\30607232.5 6 249 District Agreement 08-1679 encroachment permits for the PROJECT. 43. QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN - As used herein, the "QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN" shall mean and refer to the plan prepared by the DESIGN - BUILDER, which is submitted to the COMMISSION for approval, and to STATE for concurrence. The QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN shall establish the DESIGN- BUILDER's procedures for quality control and quality assurance. 44. QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM - As used herein, the term "QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM" shall mean and refer to the quality programs developed by the COMMISSION and DESIGN -BUILDER to provide verification of conformance with the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 45. REIMBURSED WORK - As used herein, the term "REIMBURSED WORK" shall mean and refer to work to be performed by STATE and reimbursed by COMMISSION, up to the maximum amount as set forth in SECTION I, of this AGREEMENT. REIMBURSED WORK shall, unless otherwise specified in this AGREEMENT, include only that work identified in Exhibit D, and is derived from a mutually agreed upon staffing plan updated on a yearly basis. 46. RELIEF OF MAINTENANCE - As used herein, the term "RELIEF OF MAINTENANCE," shall mean and refer to the point at which STATE will grant the NON -TOLL PROJECT FACILITIES "Maintenance and Protection Relief," as allowed in the applicable Caltrans Construction Manual existing as of May 10, 2018, and as may further be set forth in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 47. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS or RFP - As used herein, the term "REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS" or "RFP" shall mean and refer to the Request for Proposals, and all associated documents, issued by COMMISSION for the procurement of the DESIGN - BUILDER for the PROJECT, if applicable. 48. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS or RFQ — As used herein, the term "REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS" or "RFQ" shall mean and refer to the Request for Qualifications, and all associated documents, issued by COMMISSION for the short -listing of the proposers for PROJECT, if applicable. 49. SAFETY STANDARD — As used herein, the term "SAFETY STANDARD" shall mean and refer to (i) a standard adopted and published by the FHWA or STATE expressly pertaining to endangerment to life or safety on similarly situated STATE transportation facilities; (ii) applied within the same time period to all similarly situated State transportation facilities; (iii) necessary to correct an anticipated or actual imminent and substantial endangerment to life or safety; and (iv) which requires immediate implementation. 50. SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS- The term "SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS" shall mean and refer to the funding to be provided for PROJECT under SB 132, amendment to Budget Act of 2016, 2660-110-0042, for local assistance of the Riverside County Transportation Efficiency Corridor, from the State Highway Account. 17336.00034\30607232.5 7 250 District Agreement 08-1679 51. SCOPE OF WORK - The term "SCOPE OF WORK" shall mean and refer to the document(s) included in the relevant contractor or consultant contract that details the services and work to be performed under such contract. 52. SOURCE INSPECTION - As used herein, the term "SOURCE INSPECTION" shall mean and refer to sampling, testing and/or inspection of manufactured or prefabricated materials at locations other than the jobsite, generally at the manufactured location. 53. STATE FURNISHED MATERIALS or SFM — As used herein, the term "SFM" shall mean and refer to material for the PROJECT or services to be provided by STATE, at COMMISSION's request, for which COMMISSION will reimburse STATE. The PARTIES expressly agree that Construction Zone Enhanced Enforcement Program ("COZEEP") services shall be considered SFM. 54. STATE OVERSIGHT — As used herein, the term "STATE OVERSIGHT" shall mean and refer to activities performed by STATE, at STATE's sole discretion, to assure and verify, as needed, PROJECT implementation by COMMISSION is compliant with applicable standards, laws, regulations, and policies provided for under this AGREEMENT, as the same may be modified by the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, and which shall be performed at STATE's sole cost and expense. It is understood and agreed that STATE OVERSIGHT activities are for the benefit of STATE, as the owner and operator of the State Highway System only, and shall not constitute acceptance, approval or ratification of any work or process. STATE OVERSIGHT does not include any REIMBURSED WORK. 55. STATE ENHANCED OVERSIGHT — As used herein, the term "STATE ENHANCED OVERSIGHT" shall mean and refer to mutually agreed upon additional STATE personnel or consultants, over and above those normally provided for as STATE OVERSIGHT who are solely dedicated to the PROJECT. It is understood and agreed that STATE ENHANCED OVERSIGHT activities are for the benefit of the PROJECT to assure timely response and action for required STATE approvals. STATE ENHANCED OVERSIGHT will be paid by the COMMISSION as part of REIMBURSED WORK, as shown in Exhibit D. 56. STATE REPAIR OBLIGATIONS — As used herein, the term "STATE REPAIR OBLIGATIONS" shall mean and refer to obligations of STATE to repair or replace third -party caused damage that occurs within the PROJECT SHS RIGHT OF WAY, but outside of the CONSTRUCTION WORK ZONE. 57. STATE STANDARDS — As used herein, the term "STATE STANDARDS" shall mean and refer to those STATE documents which are in effect on or before May 10, 2018, including, as applicable, the FHWA STANDARDS; the version of the Standard Specifications referenced in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; Standard Plans; the guidance provided in the Guide to Capital Project Delivery Workplan Standards (previously known as WBS Guide) available at http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/projmgmt/guidance.htm; STATE manuals (including but not limited to the Right of Way Manual, Construction Manual, Highway Design Manual, 17336.00034\30607232.5 8 251 District Agreement 08-1679 California Manual on Uniform Transportation Control Devices, etc.); technical memoranda; standards; guidelines; and modifications to such standards that are set forth in or expressly incorporated into the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 58. TOLL FACILITY — As used herein, the term "TOLL FACILITY" shall mean and refer to the express lanes and related equipment and facilities that COMMISSION intends to design, construct and maintain on the existing SHS, as shown in Exhibit A. SECTION I COMMISSION AGREES: 59. COMMISSION will procure, award, and administer the DESIGN -BUILD contract provided that CONTRACT DOCUMENTS will be developed by COMMISSION in compliance with COMMISSION's regulatory and statutory procurement and contracting authority for DESIGN -BUILD procurements on the SHS, which includes, but is not limited to, COMMISSION's authority under AB 115. Furthermore, the PARTIES agree STATE shall not be considered to have privity with the DESIGN - BUILDER and the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS shall reflect the fact that no contractual relationship is to be created between the DESIGN -BUILDER and STATE. 60. To carry out the PROJECT with COMMISSION forces, consultants and contractors. If environmentally approved, PROJECT will be implemented in accordance with the ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS and all applicable federal, State, and local laws and regulations, as well as compliance with the applicable FHWA STANDARDS. 61. To be responsible for one hundred (100%) percent of all PROJECT construction capital (excluding the cost of BETTERMENTS), right-of-way and support costs, and for the cost of REIMBURSED WORK, up to the maximum amount as set forth in the following sentence, and for SFM requested by COMMISSION, all from SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS. COMMISSION shall reimburse STATE the actual cost of REIMBURSED WORK up to the maximum amount shown on Exhibit D ("COMMISSION Maximum REIMBURSED WORK Payment Obligation"). COMMISSION has no obligation to reimburse STATE over the stipulated Maximum REIMBURSED WORK Payment Obligation amount without written addendum to this AGREEMENT signed by both PARTIES. 62. That the purpose of Exhibit D is to illustrate the estimated STATE personnel to be assigned to REIMBURSED WORK, and that STATE shall manage such personnel and personnel assignments and classifications, including the use of consultants, at STATE's sole discretion, except as otherwise set forth in paragraph 135-136, up to the COMMISSION Maximum REIMBURSED WORK Payment Obligation. Except as otherwise provided herein, it is agreed that STATE has no obligation to provide STATE personnel services beyond what is provided for in Exhibit D unless otherwise agreed to by the PARTIES. 63. To fund the total amount as shown on the FUNDING SUMMARY for the PROJECT through use of SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS. 17336.00034\30607232.5 9 252 District Agreement 08-1679 64. That all of the COMMISSION and STATE OBLIGATIONS set forth in this entire AGREEMENT with respect to the construction and/or implementation of the PROJECT are expressly contingent upon the availability of SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS, and the completion of all required environmental review under both California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the approval of the proposed PROJECT. STATE shall be compensated for all REIMBURSED WORK performed for PROJECT as of the effective date of this AGREEMENT. COMMISSION may perform DESIGN -BUILD procurement work, and STATE approved early right-of-way acquisition, at COMMISSION's sole risk and cost prior to completion of review under CEQA and NEPA and approval of the proposed PROJECT. 65. As ratified by adoption of Streets and Highways Code section 149.8, and California Public Contract Code section 6820, et. seq., to utilize the DESIGN -BUILD method of procurement for implementation of PROJECT. To carry out PROJECT with COMMISSION forces, consultants, and contractors. PROJECT is to be defined and implemented in accordance with the ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS, and all applicable federal, State, and local laws, rules, and regulations. COMMISSION will implement PROJECT in accordance with applicable STATE STANDARDS, except as the same may be modified in the approved CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. COMMISSION will coordinate with STATE during development of the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, and STATE shall be afforded the opportunity to review, comment and, approve the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. 66. COMMISSION agrees that PROJECT scope adjustments must be developed cooperatively with and approved by STATE as the owner/operator of the SHS. The PARTIES agree that changes to design details or material type selections, for example, do not constitute PROJECT scope adjustments as used in this paragraph. 67. If COMMISSION elects not to proceed with the AB 115 AMENDMENT , COMMISSION will provide the REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS to STATE for STATE's timely review and concurrence, and the REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL for PROJECT to STATE for STATE's timely review and approval prior to issuance by COMMISSION, and as further specified in Section II 68. That, as of the date first specified above, STATE will participate in the selection of COMMISSION's consultants and contractors who will implement the PROJECT. If, pursuant to its rights under AB 115, COMMISSION elects to amend existing contracts for the 91 CIP or I-15 Project to include PROJECT, STATE's prior participation in the selection of such consultants and contractors shall satisfy the STATE's participation rights as set forth herein. In addition, COMMISSION has, prior to the effective date of this AGREEMENT, selected and retained certain consultants to work on PROJECT. COMMISSION agrees at the request of STATE to consider discontinuing the services of any personnel considered by STATE to be unqualified based on credentials, professional expertise, or failure to perform in accordance with SCOPE OF WORK and/or other pertinent criteria. 17336.00034\30607232.5 10 253 District Agreement 08-1679 69. As the ultimate owner of the facility, STATE will be named as the intended third party beneficiary in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The CONTRACT DOCUMENTS will include a provision granting STATE, in addition to COMMISSION, the right to pursue all legal remedies against the DESIGN -BUILDER for any "latent deficiency" pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 337.15 (b), and shall amend any contrary provision contained in the STATE STANDARDS. 70. To require the DESIGN -BUILDER to maintain professional liability insurance through completion of construction of PROJECT and the resolution of all construction contract claims and/or litigation, with a limit of liability as set forth in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. If Owner Control Insurance Program (OCIP) is proposed, to have an OCIP Feasibility Study, prepared to commercially accepted insurance standards, for approval by STATE. DESIGN -BUILDER shall maintain in force, until completion and acceptance of all phase or elements of the DESIGN -BUILD contract for PROJECT, a policy of Contractual Liability Insurance, including coverage for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability, with coverage that at a minimum meets the requirements set forth in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. Such policy shall contain an endorsement naming the State of California, its officers, agents, and employees as additional first -party insureds. Coverage shall be evidenced by a Certificate of Insurance, Policy of Insurance and a Declarations Page in a form satisfactory to STATE, all of which shall be delivered to STATE before the issuance of an encroachment permit to COMMISSION's DESIGN -BUILDER or any other consultant or agent of COMMISSION. 71. To the extent applicable, obtain and maintain business automobile liability coverage for any vehicles provided by or on behalf of COMMISSION for use by the STATE. Each policy must cover claims for accidental death, bodily injury and property damage liability arising from the ownership, maintenance or use of all owned, non -owned and hired vehicles connected with performance of the Work, including loading and unloading. Such policies must include as an insured anyone liable for the conduct of an insured as defined in the policy, or add STATE as an additional insured. COMMISSION's automobile liability coverage must have a combined single limit per policy period of not less than $1,000,000 per accident. No such policy may contain a self -insured retention exceeding $50,000 per accident. The coverage required pursuant to this paragraph shall be maintained at all times during which vehicles are provided to the STATE as set forth herein. 72. To be responsible for the preparation and implementation of the Mitigation and Monitoring Plan to be approved by STATE as part of the ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS and environmental permit, agreement, or approval process. COMMISSION, its consultant or DESIGN -BUILDER shall submit progress reports, per STATE and FHWA guidelines, to STATE for review and approval. As set forth in the ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS, and although STATE is the lead agency with respect to the ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS, COMMISSION agrees and warrants it shall comply, or cause its DESIGN -BUILDER to comply, with all PROJECT mitigation measures, including the terms and conditions of the ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS and any required environmental permits, 17336.00034\30607232.5 11 254 District Agreement 08-1679 agreements and approvals as those terms and conditions apply to STATE's and COMMISSION's responsibilities as set forth in this AGREEMENT and shall provide and certify a Mitigation Monitoring Report and Certificate of Environmental Compliance at the completion of the PROJECT. 73. If required by FHWA, to prepare and submit FHWA "Major Project Deliverables." The Major Project Deliverables, if required, shall be prepared in accordance with FHWA guidelines. 74. To retain all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred by COMMISSION, including support data for cost proposals (to the extent received from contractors), and make such materials available at the respective offices of COMMISSION and its consultants and contractors at all reasonable times during the contract period and for three years from the date of COMPLETION OF WORK or Federal Final Voucher, whichever is later. STATE or FHWA shall have access to any books, records, and documents of COMMISSION that are pertinent to this AGREEMENT for audits, examinations, excerpts, and transactions, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested. Upon completion of all work under this AGREEMENT, ownership and title to all planning and engineering reports, documents, plans, specifications and estimates, including but not limited to Resident Engineer memos and estimates backups, produced for delivery to STATE as part of PROJECT will automatically be vested in STATE and no further agreement will be necessary to transfer ownership to STATE. 75. To furnish STATE, prior to commencing work on DESIGN -BUILD activities, a proposed time schedule to complete PROJECT. 76. To have the release for construction design documents and drawings of structural, mechanical, electrical, civil, architectural, or other engineering features of PROJECT prepared by or under the direction of engineers or architects registered and licensed accordance with the most current version of the State of California, Professional Engineers Act at the time. Any reports, specifications, and each sheet of plans shall bear the professional seal, certificate number, registration classification, expiration date of certificate, and signature of the professional engineer responsible for their preparation. 77. To not specify any materials or equipment of single or sole source origin in the design of PROJECT unless COMMISSION complies with the requirements set forth in Public Contract Code section 3400(c). 78. To ensure PROJECT deliverables are subject to approval in accordance with the QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. All PROJECT design submittals once deemed complete as defined in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS shall be provided to STATE for review, comment and approval, as appropriate. All release for construction design documents and drawings are subject to review and approval by STATE, provided that the scope of STATE's review shall be limited to compliance with the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. STATE shall complete its review and provide any 17336.00034\30607232.5 12 255 District Agreement 08-1679 comments in accordance with the requirements specified in SECTION II, of this AGREEMENT. 79. To notify STATE of any deviation(s) to the PROJECT's Area of Potential Effects (APE) and/or description of the PROJECT as set forth in the ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS. Said notification shall occur within two business days of when the deviation(s) has been discovered by COMMISSION or determined to be necessary, whichever occurs first in time. 80. To obtain approval of contract change orders (CCOs), to be issued under the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, from STATE when the CCO exceeds $200,000, and for all major changes as defined in the STATE STANDARDS, prior to implementing the CCO, except as the same may be modified in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, or as otherwise approved by STATE. 81. To prepare or cause to be prepared any additional environmental documentation, including applications for new, or amendments to, environmental permits, agreements and approvals that are needed to maintain PROJECT environmental compliance and to submit said documentation to STATE for review, comment and, if appropriate, approval. Further, if changes to PROJECT warrant preparation of supplemental or subsequent ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS, COMMISSION will prepare or cause to be prepared the supplemental or subsequent ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS and STATE as CEQA and NEPA lead agency will review and, if appropriate certify and/or approve the supplemental or subsequent ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS. All noticing and circulation and other procedural responsibilities will be carried out as set forth for the original ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS. 82. To perform all right-of-way acquisition activities, including the exercise of COMMISSION's power of eminent domain granted under California Public Utilities Code (CPUC) section 130220.5, including, the right to hear Resolutions of Necessity without STATE's written approval for PROJECT pursuant to its authority under Section 149.8 of the Streets and Highways Code, if necessary, as a cost to PROJECT. All such acquisition activities shall be in compliance with applicable state and federal laws and regulations, and applicable FHWA STANDARDS and STATE STANDARDS, unless otherwise approved by STATE, subject to STATE OVERSIGHT under this AGREEMENT, to ensure that the acquired properties are acceptable for incorporation into the SHS right-of-way. 83. To transfer title to properties to be incorporated into STATE's highway right-of-way in a manner acceptable to STATE in fee simple absolute and free and clear of all liens, claims or encumbrances except as approved by STATE. Acceptance of said title by STATE is subject to a prior review and approval of a Policy of Title Insurance issued in the name of the State of California and in an amount commensurate with the estimated fair market value of the realty. 17336.00034\30607232.5 13 256 District Agreement 08-1679 84. To maintain and manage any excess land acquired as a result of PROJECT until said excess land is disposed of by COMMISSION, unless such land was purchased with federal funds, in which case applicable federal rules shall govern the vesting and/or disposition of such property. Any existing STATE owned right-of-way not needed for the PROJECT shall not be deemed "excess" by COMMISSION and shall remain vested in STATE, unless otherwise agreed by the STATE. 85. To provide a land surveyor licensed in the State of California to be responsible for surveying and right-of-way engineering. All survey and right-of-way engineering documents shall bear the professional seal, certification number, registration classification, expiration date of certificate, and signature of the responsible surveyor consistent with the Professional Land Surveyors Act. 86. To be responsible for performing, within SHS right-of-way, all pre -construction monumentation perpetuation and perform all post -construction monumentation and the mapping/documentation thereof in conformance with applicable STATE STANDARDS, except where modified in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. This work includes, but is not limited to: • the recovery, reestablishment, and survey of points which control existing SHS right-of-way lines, or other pertinent boundary lines and centerlines, and the monumentation thereof, • the survey and establishment of existing SHS right-of-way lines and monumentation thereof for areas where the PROJECT improvements are outside or directly adjacent to the existing right of way; • the preservation of existing monumentation threatened by construction; • the survey, establishment and monumentation of new SHS right-of-way lines and re-monumentation of points destroyed by construction because of PROJECT. 87. To identify and locate all high and low risk underground facilities within the area of PROJECT and to protect or otherwise provide for such facilities, all in accordance with applicable law and the procedures set forth in STATE's policy on high and low risk underground facilities. 88. If existing public and/or private utilities conflict with construction of PROJECT, COMMISSION shall make all necessary arrangements with the owners of such facilities for their protection, relocation, or removal and shall inspect the protection, relocation, or removal of such facilities at no cost to STATE. COMMISSION shall require any utility owner performing the protection or relocation work within SHS right-of-way to obtain an encroachment permit from STATE prior to the performance of said work. Any relocated or new utilities shall be shown and identified on the As - Built plans. 89. To comply with the requirements of existing STATE Utility Master Agreements of record. 17336.00034\30607232.5 14 257 District Agreement 08-1679 90. To furnish evidence to STATE, in a form reasonably acceptable to STATE, that arrangements have been made for the protection, relocation, or removal of all conflicting facilities within SHS right-of-way and that such work will be either completed by the utility providers, or will be provided for in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 91. To be responsible for the investigation of potential hazardous material sites within and outside of the existing SHS right-of-way that would impact PROJECT as part of COMMISSION responsibility for the PROJECT Environmental Document. If COMMISSION encounters hazardous material contamination or unanticipated protected cultural materials within the existing and proposed SHS right-of-way during said investigation or in the course of construction, COMMISSION shall immediately notify STATE and responsible control agencies of such discovery. 92. To procure, award, and administer the DESIGN -BUILD contract for PROJECT provided that CONTRACT DOCUMENTS will be developed by COMMISSION in compliance with COMMISSION's regulatory and statutory procurement and contracting authority for DESIGN -BUILD procurements on SHS, including Public Contract Code Section 6820, et. seq., and AB 115, if COMMISSION elects to utilize such authority. If the work performed on PROJECT is done under contract and falls within the Labor Code section 1720(a)(1) definition of "public work" in that it is construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair; or maintenance work under Labor Code section 1771, COMMISSION must conform to the provisions of Labor Code sections 1720 through 1815, and all applicable provisions of California Code of Regulations found in Title 8, Chapter 8, Subchapter 3, Articles 1-7. COMMISSION agrees to include prevailing wage requirements in its contracts for public work. Work performed by COMMISSION's own forces is exempt from the Labor Code's Prevailing Wage requirements. COMMISSION shall require its contractors to include prevailing wage requirements in accordance with the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS in all subcontracts funded by this AGREEMENT when the work to be performed by the subcontractor is a "public work" as defined in Labor Code section 1720(a)(1) and Labor Code section 1771. Subcontracts shall include all applicable prevailing wage requirements. COMMISSION shall obtain applicable wage rates from the State Department of Industrial Relations. 93. To utilize a qualified STATE -approved public agency or consultant in all right-of-way activities. Right-of-way consultant contracts will be administered by a qualified right- of-way professional. 94. To apply for and obtain encroachment permits for required work within SHS right-of- way in accordance with STATE standard permit procedures. Contractors and/or agents will not perform work within SHS right-of-way without an encroachment permit issued in their name. To obtain all other permits and approvals, including local agency and regulatory agency permits and approval documentation for construction of PROJECT. In the event that railroads are involved, COMMISSION will coordinate with the 17336.00034\30607232.5 15 258 District Agreement 08-1679 railroad and the California Public Utilities Commission to obtain needed approvals. Copies of all permits obtained for PROJECT shall be submitted to STATE. The Quality Management Plan to be prepared by the DESIGN -BUILDER is to be submitted to STATE for review and approval prior to issuance of encroachment permits for construction, in accordance with the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 95. That in recognition that PROJECT construction work done on STATE property will not be directly funded and paid by STATE, for the purpose of protecting stop notice claimants and the interests of STATE relative to the successful completion of PROJECT, COMMISSION shall require the DESIGN -BUILDER to furnish both a payment and performance bond, issued by a California admitted surety naming COMMISSION as obligee with both bonds complying with the requirements of applicable laws and in the form provided in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, or other security approved in writing by STATE. COMMISSION shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless STATE and all its officers and employees from all claims by stop notice claimants related to the construction of PROJECT under the payment bond or otherwise. 96. That all survey work shall conform to the methods, procedures, and requirements of Caltrans Surveys Manual and Caltrans Staking Information Booklet, except as the same may be modified in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. COMMISSION agrees to use primary horizontal and vertical survey control information provided by STATE in developing the survey control for PROJECT. 97. Material testing and quality control shall conform to those provisions of applicable STATE STANDARDS, except as the same may be modified in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, and shall be performed by a material -tester certified by STATE in accordance with its standard certification procedures. 98. To submit for STATE approval, a draft Transportation Management Plan (TMP) for PROJECT, which shall comply with the STATE TMP guidelines. Final TMP will be prepared by the DESIGN -BUILDER during PROJECT design. COMMISSION shall provide the final TMP to STATE for review and approval in accordance with the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS and PROJECT timelines and schedules. 99. To furnish, at PROJECT expense and subject to the approval of STATE, PROJECT Representatives who are licensed Civil Engineers in the State of California, to perform the functions of a Resident Engineer and a Structural Engineer. The Resident Engineer and the Structural Engineer shall not be employees or agents of the DESIGN - BUILDER or any related entity. If the Resident Engineer is not also a registered Landscape Architect, COMMISSION will furnish, at COMMISSION'S expense a registered Landscape Architect to perform work related to architecture treatment and landscaping and to perform the function of an Assistant Resident Engineer/Inspector who is responsible for both daily on -site inspection and final decisions including, but not limited to, any highway planting and the irrigation systems that comprise a portion of the PROJECT work, consistent with any applicable measures in the environmental commitments record. 17336.00034\30607232.5 16 259 District Agreement 08-1679 100. At PROJECT expense, to furnish qualified support staff to assist the Resident Engineer with contract administration, and other inspection and staff services necessary to assure that construction is being performed in conformance with this AGREEMENT and with the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. Said qualified support staff engaged in COMMISSION activities shall be independent of the DESIGN -BUILDER and shall not be an employee or agent of any related entity. 101. To provide a Safety Engineer/Manager who will be responsible for auditing the DESIGN -BUILDER for compliance with any PROJECT safety plans, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements and STATE, COMMISSION, and local jurisdiction requirements set forth in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 102. Prior to Final Acceptance, as that term is defined in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, to furnish STATE with a complete set of pre -approved design plans depicting the proposed construction of the PROJECT; a complete set of "As -Built" plans and all STATE requested contract records, including survey documents, Records of Surveys, and structure As -Built documents according to the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The format of these plans, records and documents shall be in both printed and readily readable electronic format, consistent with the format used by STATE as of the date of issuance of the final addendum to the RFP. 103. Subject to paragraphs 180 through 188 of this Agreement, to be responsible for maintenance and repair of the TOLL FACILITY and the NON -TOLL PROJECT FACILITIES located within the designated PROJECT SHS right-of-way upon the issuance by STATE of an encroachment permit to the DESIGN -BUILDER. COMMISSION shall be responsible for such maintenance and repair of the NON - TOLL PROJECT FACILITIES until RELIEF OF MAINTENANCE is granted by STATE of the NON -TOLL PROJECT FACILITIES. Maintenance and repair of PROJECT facilities includes, but is not limited to, compliance with all legally required storm water provisions, landscaping and irrigation, pavement, signs, lighting, barriers, guardrail, graffiti abatement, weed abatement, removing debris, and general housekeeping. Major damage to PROJECT structures and roadway facilities by hazardous spills and causes beyond COMMISSION control, including but not limited to, any incidence of fire, flood, earthquake, or other acts of God will be STATE's responsibility. 104. To maintain any part of the PROJECT facilities located outside of the current SHS right-of-way until acceptance of any such part of the PROJECT facilities into the SHS by STATE. 105. That if COMMISSION terminates PROJECT prior to completion thereof, STATE may require COMMISSION, at COMMISSION expense, utilizing SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS, to return the affected SHS right-of-way to its original condition or a condition acceptable for permanent public operations. If COMMISSION fails to do so, STATE reserves the right to finish the NON -TOLL PROJECT FACILITIES or to place the NON -TOLL PROJECT FACILITIES in a condition satisfactory for permanent public operations. STATE will bill COMMISSION for all actual expenses incurred and 17336.00034\30607232.5 17 260 District Agreement 08-1679 COMMISSION agrees to pay said expenses within thirty (30) days of issuance of that invoice or STATE, acting through the State Controller or State Treasurer, may withhold an equal amount from future apportionments due COMMISSION from STIP or any other sources. 106. If unanticipated cultural, archaeological, paleontological, biological, or other protected resources are encountered during construction of PROJECT, COMMISSION shall stop work in that area until a qualified professional evaluates the nature and significance of the find and a plan is approved for the removal or protection of that resource, which plan must be in accordance with applicable law. COMMISSION shall notify STATE within 24 hours of any said discovery. The costs for any removal or protection shall be covered as a PROJECT cost. 107. COMMISSION shall provide STATE personnel dedicated to the PROJECT, acceptable office space, furniture, utilities, laptops, cell -phones, and any other items necessary to perform their work at no expense to STATE for the duration of PROJECT. 108. To notify STATE in writing of the projected date for achievement of Final Acceptance, as that term is defined in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 109. Final Acceptance of PROJECT will include all necessary documentation and approvals from affected local agencies for those segments which will have maintenance and operational control relinquished back to said local agencies. 110. To accept maintenance of the TOLL FACILITY upon PROJECT substantial completion, as that term shall be defined in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. COMMISSION will accept control of and operate and maintain, at COMMISSION's sole cost and expense, the TOLL FACILITY lying within the SHS right-of-way. The terms and conditions for the operation and maintenance of the TOLL FACILITY will be covered in a separate maintenance agreement. 111. COMMISSION shall obtain all required permits for construction of PROJECT from third parties, including but not limited to railroads, the City of Corona and resource agencies. 112. COMMISSION shall ensure that the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS include the provisions of STATE Standard Specification 7-1.03 (2010 ed.), subject to amendments approved by STATE, to ensure that public convenience is maintained by the DESIGN - BUILDER whenever work is performed by or on behalf of COMMISSION under an encroachment permit within the SHS right-of-way. COMMISSION shall enforce such provisions in a reasonable manner pursuant to the procedures set forth in, and terms of, the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 113. To submit a written request for any SFM identified in the PROJECT plans and specifications, or as may otherwise be required by COMMISSION, a minimum of one hundred eighty (180) days in advance of the need for such materials or services identified by the PARTIES as SFM. Such notice may be waived at STATE's discretion on a case by case basis. As applicable, COMMISSION may take delivery of the SFM 17336.00034\30607232.5 18 261 District Agreement 08-1679 after STATE's receipt of COMMISSION's payment at the location directed by STATE. SFM shall be considered a PROJECT cost. 114. COMMISSION authorizes STATE to deduct, from SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS the actual cost invoiced for the requested SFM. 115. COMMISSION will, as part of PROJECT, incorporate into the PROJECT scope for the AB 115 AMENDMENT or the REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, as applicable, STATE requested BETTERMENTS, if any, all as further set forth in Exhibit E. 116. COMMISSION will submit invoices to STATE for SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS for PROJECT work completed by or on behalf of COMMISSION. 117. COMMISSION authorizes STATE to deduct from SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS the actual cost invoiced for the REIMBURSED WORK, up to the COMMISSION Maximum REIMBURSED WORK Payment Obligation, as defined in SECTION I, of this AGREEMENT, excluding any amounts in dispute, as further specified in Section II. SECTION II STATE AGREES: 118. That all of COMMISSION and STATE OBLIGATIONS set forth in this entire AGREEMENT with respect to the construction and/or implementation of the PROJECT are expressly contingent upon the availability of SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS, and completion of all required environmental review under both CEQA and NEPA and the approval of the proposed PROJECT which results from said reviews. 119. To fund up to the amount set forth in Exhibit E for BETTERMENTS, if any. Total STATE contribution towards the PROJECT cost is shown on the FUNDING SUMMARY attached hereto and made a part of this AGREEMENT. 120. To be the agency responsible for timely performing the REIMBURSED WORK for the NOT TO EXCEED amount identified in Exhibit D. STATE shall notify COMMISSION in writing prior to commencing performance of any REIMBURSED WORK for which it feels exceed or is not consistent with the mutually agreed upon staff plan, and shall provide COMMISSION at least ninety (90) days prior written notice that its costs are anticipated to exceed the NOT TO EXCEED amount identified in Exhibit D. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the PARTIES are unable to reach agreement on an amended NOT TO EXCEED amount for any reason, the PARTIES shall promptly follow the issue resolution process identified in paragraph 210. 121. To provide additional work and services not included herein as requested in writing by COMMISSION and agreed to in writing by STATE followed by an amendment to Exhibit D. 122. If applicable, STATE shall timely, in accordance with the schedule agreed upon by the 17336.00034\30607232.5 19 262 District Agreement 08-1679 PARTIES, provide its review and concurrence of the REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATION and the review and approval of the REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL for PROJECT prior to issuance by COMMISSION, or as applicable, of the AB 115 AMENDMENT. 123. STATE shall timely, in accordance with the schedule agreed upon by the PARTIES, provide its review and approval, if required, of the PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN, FINANCE PLAN and COST ESTIMATE REVIEW. 124. STATE shall participate, through the review of procurement documents and involvement in the evaluation process, in the selection of the DESIGN -BUILDER, the project and construction manager, and the toll systems contractor. COMMISSION and STATE shall mutually identify any other PROJECT related contracts that are appropriate for participation by STATE in the evaluation and selection process. Although not required to participate, STATE shall timely notify COMMISSION if STATE desires to participate in any such identified procurements or evaluations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if, pursuant to its rights under AB 115, COMMISSION elects to amend the existing contract with SAJV for the I-15 Project, and/or the existing contracts with the project and construction manager, and/or the toll systems contractor for the I-15 Project, STATE'S prior participation in the procurements of these contracts shall satisfy the STATE's participation rights as set forth herein, and STATE hereby approves use of AB 115 for procurement of these contracts for the PROJECT. 125. STATE shall provide its concurrence in a timely manner, in accordance with the timeframes set forth in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, to COMMISSION for the issuance of a Certificate of Substantial Completion and a Certificate of Final Acceptance for the DESIGN -BUILD contract. 126. STATE shall perform CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES for PROJECT using STATE employees or consultants under contract with STATE. 127. As part of its CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES responsibilities, STATE shall include a direct reporting relationship between the STATE inspectors and senior STATE engineers responsible for all STATE inspectors and CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES. 128. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, STATE retains the authority to stop the DESIGN-BUILDER's work wholly or in part and take appropriate action when public safety is jeopardized on PROJECT. STATE' authority to stop the DESIGN - BUILDER'S work includes but is not limited to work performed under an encroachment permit within the SHS right-of-way, including, but not limited to, work performed that includes lane closures, signing, work performed at night, detours, dust control, temporary pavement quality, crash cushions, temporary railings, pavement transitions, falsework, shoring, and delineation. STATE shall regularly inspect the job sites for safety compliance and any possible deficiencies. If any deficiency is observed, a written notice shall be sent by STATE to COMMISSION for corrective action. Once the deficiency is corrected, a written notice describing the resolution of the deficiency 17336.00034\30607232.5 20 263 District Agreement 08-1679 shall be sent to STATE by COMMISSION and documented. 129. To provide additional REIMBURSED WORK not included herein as requested in writing by the COMMISSION and agreed to by STATE in writing. If such additional REIMBURSED WORK is required, the PARTIES will negotiate and execute an addendum to this AGREEMENT. 130. To provide STATE OVERSIGHT of the PROJECT work performed by COMMISSION, at STATE's sole cost and expense. 131. To process, review and approve, as appropriate, complete submittals by COMMISSION. Incomplete submittals shall be promptly returned without review but with explanation as to what is required to render such submittals "complete." STATE shall cooperate with COMMISSION and its consultants and contractors (including, without limitation, the DESIGN -BUILDER) with development of PROJECT and shall provide comments, reviews and if appropriate, approvals within the time frames and in accordance with the standards of review specified in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS and as agreed to in the quality assurance procedures contained in the QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. COMMISSION shall not be required to implement comments not timely submitted by STATE. Nothing in this paragraph precludes the reasonable exercise of the professional discretion by STATE with respect to review and approvals in accordance with the terms of the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, including the potential to refuse requested approvals under the terms of the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, provided that the scope of STATE's review shall be limited to compliance with the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. STATE agrees to provide reviews of and any comments to each submittal at the time the submittal is provided to STATE in order to avoid compiling all comments to the final review of a submittal. 132. To refer COMMISSION to all necessary regulations, policies, procedures, manuals, standard plans and specifications, and other standards required for the administration of PROJECT. 133. To make a determination of need for a NEPA/CEQA revalidation/reevaluation within 30 calendar days of receiving the proper documentation from COMMISSION. The STATE determination of need shall include, but not be limited to, the following information: 1) If Work in the area of the PROJECT can continue, 2) the type of future documentation required, and 3) if re-evaluation is required, an estimate of time to process the re-evaluation based upon the documentation provided by COMMISSION. 134. That STATE will participate in the selection and approval of COMMISSION's consultants and contractors who will perform PROJECT. STATE recognizes that COMMISSION has, prior to the effective date of this AGREEMENT, selected and retained certain consultants to work on PROJECT. If, pursuant to its rights under AB 115, COMMISSION elects to amend existing contracts for the 91 CIP or I-15 Project to include PROJECT, STATE's prior participation in the selection of such consultants and contractors shall satisfy the STATE's participation rights as set forth herein, and 17336.00034\30607232.5 21 264 District Agreement 08-1679 STATE hereby approves use of AB 115 for procurement of any such consultants and contractors for the PROJECT. 135. That STATE shall, prior to permitting any managerial employee of STATE for whom reimbursement will be sought from COMMISSION, provide to COMMISSION, for COMMISSION's review and comment, information regarding the credentials, professional expertise and availability of such management employee. STATE agrees that it shall not substitute any STATE managerial employee assigned to PROJECT, and whose services are subject to reimbursement by COMMISSION, without prior notice to COMMISSION. STATE agrees to consider any request by COMMISSION to discontinue the services of any personnel considered by COMMISSION to be unqualified based on credentials, professional expertise, or failure to perform in accordance with SCOPE OF WORK and/or other pertinent criteria. 136. That STATE shall, prior to permitting any consultant of STATE for whom reimbursement will be sought from COMMISSION, provide COMMISSION, for COMMISSION's review and approval, information regarding the credentials, professional expertise and availability of such consultant. STATE agrees that it shall not substitute any consultant assigned to PROJECT, and whose services are subject to reimbursement by COMMISSION, without prior notice to COMMISSION. STATE has, prior to the effective date of this AGREEMENT, selected and retained certain consultants to work on PROJECT, as well as other projects. STATE shall provide COMMISSION with the names of said retained consultants for COMMISSION's review and approval. Except where impracticable, STATE shall, upon request by COMMISSION, discontinue the services of any consultant considered by COMMISSION to be unqualified based on credentials, professional expertise, or failure to perform in accordance with SCOPE OF WORK and/or other pertinent criteria. 137. STATE shall, upon COMMISSION written request, and subject to reimbursement by COMMISSION, make reasonable efforts to engage additional staff or consultants for PROJECT who may be available, as needed, to perform any PROJECT work or services as necessary, as further specified in this AGREEMENT. 138. If COMMISSION elects not to proceed with the AB 115 AMENDMENT, that STATE will participate in the development of and will approve, the technical requirements, including environmental requirements, of the final RFP before the release of those requirements in the final RFP to the proposers. 139. To issue, at no cost to COMMISSION, upon acceptable completed applications by COMMISSION and its consultants or DESIGN -BUILDER, those necessary encroachment permits to authorize entry onto SHS right-of-way to perform activities required for PROJECT, within thirty (30) days following receipt of an acceptable application. The standards for approval of such permit application shall be no more stringent than applied on STATE projects. If COMMISSION uses consultants rather than its own staff to perform required work, those consultants will also be required to obtain an encroachment permit which will be issued at no cost upon proper application by the consultants. In reviewing and issuing any necessary encroachment permits, 17336.00034\30607232.5 22 265 District Agreement 08-1679 STATE shall approve encroachment permits that are consistent with the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS which will have been approved by STATE. The generally -applicable requirement of evidence of insurance coverage by encroachment permittees, including the procurement of a certificate of insurance naming the State of California and its employees, officers and agents as a first party, additional named insured, is not a "cost" within the meaning of this paragraph and is expressly not waived as a condition of issuance of any encroachment permit COMMISSION's Permit shall be contingent upon submittal of COMMISSION's QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN concurrence by STATE. 140. That, except to the extent that STATE reasonably determines that work is required for public safety or to prevent significant property damage, STATE will, to the extent possible, avoid performing major maintenance, rehabilitation or construction within the existing SHS right-of-way that would increase costs, delay PROJECT completion or otherwise adversely and materially impact PROJECT. Prior to STATE undertaking any major maintenance or repair work within the SHS right of way adjacent to PROJECT, STATE shall contact COMMISSION to coordinate its work with COMMISSION in order to avoid interference with the PROJECT. Prior to issuance, any STATE encroachment permit for work within the PROJECT limits, except in cases requiring the immediate protection of public safety or to prevent significant property damage, shall be forwarded to COMMISSION Resident Engineer for review and comment. 141. To work with COMMISSION with the goal that all applicable State and Federal rules and regulations are followed and approvals obtained. Exceptions to applicable STATE STANDARDS needed for DESIGN -BUILD procurement are to be approved in the sole discretion of STATE, and such approval shall be in writing. Incorporation of such approved exceptions into the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS shall satisfy the foregoing requirement. 142. To participate in first, and if necessary, second level Condemnation Panel Reviews scheduled and facilitated by the COMMISSION. 143. Upon presentation by COMMISSION, to accept from COMMISSION, good and sufficient fee simple absolute title to that real property acquired in fee by COMMISSION for STATE pursuant to this AGREEMENT subject to a prior review and approval by STATE of the form of title, free of liens or exceptions, except as otherwise approved by STATE, and supported by a policy of title insurance issued in the name of STATE. 144. To timely provide, at COMMISSION's cost and upon COMMISSION's request, any SFM as determined by STATE to be appropriate and available during construction of PROJECT. STATE shall not be obligated to provide SFM, but may do so at its discretion. Upon receipt of COMMISSION's request for any such SFM, STATE will order the SFM and STATE's PROJECT Coordinator will have an invoice submitted to COMMISSION for the cost of the SFM. Upon receipt of the SFM and COMMISSION's payment, STATE will make the SFM available to COMMISSION at 17336.00034\30607232.5 23 266 District Agreement 08-1679 a STATE designated site, or will provide the SFM as agreed upon in writing by the PARTIES. 145. Upon completion of PROJECT to furnish COMMISSION with a detailed final accounting of the SFM, and REIMBURSED WORK. Based on the final accounting, STATE will refund or invoice as necessary in order to satisfy the financial OBLIGATIONS of this AGREEMENT. 146. To retain all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred by STATE and make such materials available at the respective offices of STATE and its consultants and contractors at all reasonable times during the contract period and for three years from the date of COMPLETION OF WORK or Federal Final Voucher, whichever is later. Upon request, STATE agrees to provide copies of any books, records, and documents that are pertinent to this AGREEMENT. 147. STATE agrees to provide primary horizontal and vertical survey control information for use in developing the survey control for PROJECT. 148. As applicable, STATE agrees to grant RELIEF OF MAINTENANCE of NON -TOLL PROJECT FACILITIES upon acceptance of such facilities as further set forth herein. Upon such grant of relief, STATE will accept control of and operate and maintain, at STATE's sole cost and expense, those NON -TOLL PROJECT FACILITIES lying within the SHS right-of-way, except local roads delegated to local agencies for maintenance. 149. To perform SOURCE INSPECTION as outlined in STATE's Construction Manual. COMMISSION shall reimburse STATE, as part of the REIMBURSED WORK, up to the COMMISSION Maximum REIMBURSED WORK Payment Obligation, for all direct and indirect costs incurred for any SOURCE INSPECTION performed by STATE, as further set forth in Exhibit D. 150. Independent assurance testing, testing required to verify the DESIGN-BUILDER's work, which is not available commercially and which is proprietary (STATE -owned), and approval of the type of asphalt and concrete plants shall be performed by STATE and shall be considered REIMBURSED WORK. 151. To invoice COMMISSION for SFM within thirty (30) days of STATE's receipt of COMMISSION's request for the SFM, and to deduct invoiced amounts from SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS. 152. STATE will contribute the maximum amount shown on Exhibit E of STATE funds to COMMISSION, as payment for BETTERMENTS, if any. 153. STATE will pay COMMISSION within 30 calendar days of receipt of invoice as payment for BETTERMENTS. 17336.00034\30607232.5 24 267 District Agreement 08-1679 154. After PARTIES agree that all REIMBURSED WORK is complete for PROJECT, STATE will submit a final accounting for all costs. Based on the final accounting, PARTIES will refund or invoice as necessary in order to satisfy the financial commitments of this AGREEMENT. 155. In the event of damage to the SHS or its appurtenances; and to the extent the repair is the responsibility of the DESIGN -BUILDER or of COMMISSION; and to the extent STATE has available inventory of appropriate materials in its inventory; STATE agrees to make such materials available for use by the DESIGN -BUILDER or COMMISSION. Materials provided pursuant to this section shall not be deemed SFM and COMMISSION shall reimburse STATE for the cost of replacement and/or, restocking of STATE's inventory. 156. COMMISSION will invoice STATE for SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS for work completed by or on behalf of COMMISSION for the PROJECT. STATE will pay invoices within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of invoice when not paying with Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT). When paying with EFT, STATE or COMMISSION will pay invoices within five (5) calendar days of receipt of invoice. 157. The PARTIES agree that STATE is to be reimbursed from SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS administered by STATE. Therefore, STATE will draw from those funds without invoicing COMMISSION in advance of the draw down. Within the timeframe set forth in paragraph 167 below, STATE shall provide to COMMISSION monthly invoices supporting the draw down, which invoices shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of this AGREEMENT. COMMISSION shall have the right to dispute any invoice, or portion thereof, for which a draw down of funds has been made. If it is determined pursuant to a resolution of any such dispute that a draw down of funds, or portion thereof, was not in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT, STATE shall reimburse the PROJECT in the amount of the disputed funds. 158. STATE agrees that District 8 of STATE shall have authority to act on behalf of District 12 of STATE as relates to approval of PROJECT documents and work for portions of PROJECT in Orange County. SECTION III IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: 159. STATE and COMMISSION desire to implement a collaborative approach for the development of PROJECT, using the resources of both agencies to expedite the process and agree to implement all the provisions of California Public Contract Code section 6820, et. seq. and Streets and Highways Code section 91.2. In furtherance of such collaboration, STATE and COMMISSION concur that the AB 115 AMENDMENT, and amendments to existing I-15 Project contracts that have or may be awarded by the COMMISSION for the PROJECT, including contracts for project and construction management, toll systems installation, operations and maintenance and/or planning, design, right-of-way, financing or other related services, 17336.00034\30607232.5 25 District Agreement 08-1679 provide the most cost-effective approach to accelerate construction of the PROJECT. 160. The cost of REIMBURSED WORK includes all direct and applicable indirect costs. STATE calculates indirect costs based solely on the type of funds used to pay support costs. State and federal funds are subject to the current Program Functional Rate. Local funds are subject to the current Program Functional Rate and the current Administration Rate. The Program Functional Rate and the Administration Rate are adjusted periodically, and the Parties agree that these rates may be subject to an annual increase or decrease based on the STATE Programs and Policies. 161. STATE and COMMISSION recognize that applicable STATE STANDARDS and other standards may be in conflict with a DESIGN -BUILD procurement and project delivery method. COMMISSION shall coordinate with STATE during development of the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, and STATE shall be afforded the opportunity to review, comment and approve the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS during the development of the AB 115 AMENDMENT or the RFP, as applicable, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. Once approved by STATE, the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS shall control the design and construction of the PROJECT and any deviations to the applicable STATE STANDARDS and other standards that are set forth in the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS shall be deemed approved by STATE. 162. That COMMISSION has the right and authority, in accordance with 23 CFR 636.109 and as allowed in the amended (August 14, 2007) FHWA regulations for DESIGN - BUILD contracting, Section 1503 of the "Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users" (SAFETEA—LU), and as modified by the federal Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) legislation, to issue the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and RFP prior to completion of the NEPA process. The release of the RFP or execution of the AB 115 AMENDMENT prior to NEPA approval shall be subject to the following limitations as outlined in the FHWA regulations: a) Issue an RFP or execute an AB 115 AMENDMENT prior to the conclusion of the NEPA process as long as the RFP or AB 115 AMENDMENT informs proposers, or as applicable, SAJV, of the general status of the NEPA process and that no commitment will be made as to any alternative under evaluation in the NEPA process; b) Preclude a contractor from obtaining approval of final design or commencing construction before NEPA is complete, unless otherwise permitted by law. 163. That all OBLIGATIONS of the PARTIES under the terms of this AGREEMENT are subject to the availability of SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS, and that STATE's obligations are further subject to appropriation of resources by the Legislature and allocation of funds by the CTC to STATE for the purposes of fulfilling STATE OBLIGATIONS herein, if not funded by SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS. Should SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS no longer be available, or, if applicable, should the Legislature fail to allocate funds to STATE for purposes of fulfilling STATE OBLIGATIONS hereunder, the PARTIES agree to meet and confer in an attempt to close the funding shortfall, or may terminate this AGREEMENT in accordance with Section III, paragraph 213. 17336.00034\30607232.5 26 269 District Agreement 08-1679 164. PARTIES acknowledge that, pursuant to Section 91.2(c) of the Streets and Highways Code, STATE resources necessary for the performance of those services identified hereunder as STATE ENHANCED OVERSIGHT, CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES and SOURCE INSPECTION, including personnel requirements, are legally mandated to be included in STATE's capital outlay support program for workload purposes in the annual Budget Act. 165. In the event this AGREEMENT is terminated in accordance with SECTION I, of this AGREEMENT, payments to STATE shall be made through and including the entire month in which the termination occurred for amounts earned and owing under this AGREEMENT. 166. STATE and COMMISSION agree to meet prior to September 1 of every year to review the STATE's staffing plan for REIMBURSED WORK for the following fiscal year. The PARTIES shall mutually agree to the staffing levels to be programmed in the following fiscal year by the STATE and any necessary adjustments to the REIMBURSED WORK Summary shown on EXHIBIT D. The STATE agrees to provide the appropriate staffing and resources as mutually agreed in the work plan and to fulfill its responsibilities for performing all REIMBURSED WORK. The COMMISSION will not be responsible for any REIMBURSED WORK in excess of the yearly budget derived from the staff plan, unless a mutually agreed adjustment is made to the REIMBURSED WORK Summary shown on EXHIBIT D. 167. That timely and accurate invoicing by the STATE is of high importance to both PARTIES. Accordingly, the following shall be implemented: (a) STATE Corridor Director, or his designee, shall review and approve all monthly STATE invoices prior submission to COMMISSION. (b) STATE shall submit to COMMISSION an approved monthly invoice no more than 30 calendar days following the close of the previous month's billing cycle. REIMBURSED WORK invoiced by the STATE to the COMMISSION more than 180 days after the work was performed shall be considered delinquent and not reimbursable by the COMMISSION. STATE invoices for support costs shall include all direct and applicable indirect costs. Costs for REIMBURSED WORK not invoiced to COMMISSION within 180 days shall be the responsibility of the STATE. (c) STATE shall be entitled to draw down SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS for REIMBURSED WORK, up to the COMMISSION Maximum REIMBURSED WORK Payment Obligation, as defined in SECTION I, of this AGREEMENT. (d) Prior to any REIMBURSED WORK being performed on PROJECT, STATE and COMMISSION Project Managers shall mutually agree on the individuals allowed to charge to REIMBURSED WORK. Those individuals shall be limited to those required to fill the positions shown on Exhibit D. In 17336.00034\30607232.5 27 270 District Agreement 08-1679 consultation with the Commissions' Project Manager, the STATE Project Manager shall update this approved list monthly. (e) STATE will be responsible for the development of the REIMBURSED WORK invoice format, including cost, schedule and status reports, to be jointly agreed upon prior to implementation and payment. 168. To incorporate into the PROJECT scope, via an AB 115 AMENDMENT or REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, as applicable, STATE requested BETTERMENTS as shown on Exhibit E. The cost of the BETTERMENTS shall be borne in their entirety by the STATE and paid in accordance with the provisions of this section. STATE acknowledges the potentially negative impact of changes occurring during construction and shall endeavor to minimize any Betterment requests after issuance of the final REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. (a) The cost of the BETTERMENTS set forth in Exhibit E shall be the agreed upon lump sum amount set forth in Exhibit E. The foregoing lump sum amount shall constitute full payment for all design, construction, testing, and inspections performed by COMMISSION, its consultants, and/or contractor. The lump sum amount of the BETTERMENTS shall only be changed if a material change in the BETTERMENTS is requested by STATE, or if the DESIGN -BUILDER is entitled a change order under the "Changes of Work" clause of the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. Change order costs directly attributed to the BETTERMENTS are not included in the lump sum amount for the BETTERMENTS, and shall be the financial responsibility of STATE. STATE shall be afforded the opportunity to inspect, review and participate in any change order discussions directly impacting the BETTERMENTS. (b) COMMISSION shall have no obligation to undertake any Betterment requested beyond those identified in Exhibit E after release of the final REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, or execution of an AB 115 AMENDMENT, as applicable. If such BETTERMENTS are acceptable to COMMISSION in its sole discretion, COMMISSION shall include them in the SCOPE OF WORK for the PROJECT. No BETTERMENTS that are inconsistent with the PROJECT's ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS, or that would require re-evaluation, revalidation or supplementation of the environmental document shall be considered, unless otherwise determined by the Commission, in its sole discretion. Proposed BETTERMENTS must be in compliance with SAFETY STANDARDS and with all applicable law. (c) In the event STATE requests BETTERMENTS for incorporation into the PROJECT after release of the REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, or after execution of an AB 115 AMENDMENT, to incorporate PROJECT, as applicable, and COMMISSION agrees to incorporate such BETTERMENTS into the PROJECT, STATE shall be solely responsible for all costs and expenses related thereto, including (i) the costs incurred to incorporate the BETTERMENTS into the SCOPE OF WORK of the PROJECT, (ii) additional 17336.00034\30607232.5 28 271 District Agreement 08-1679 design, construction and oversight costs arising from or associated with the BETTERMENTS, including change orders related thereto; (iii) additional operations and maintenance costs arising from or associated with the BETTERMENTS, including change orders related thereto; and (iv) costs associated with any impact on the design and construction schedule associated with the BETTERMENTS, including any associated PROJECT delay cost and damages. 169. That STATE shall designate a STATE representative to represent STATE, and COMMISSION shall designate a PROJECT Representative through whom all communications between the two agencies shall be channeled. The STATE representative or other official designated by STATE shall review the work of COMMISSION through completion of PROJECT. 170. That COMMISSION shall establish a PROJECT document control system acceptable to STATE. Document control, storage, and retrieval methods will include the use of both hard copies and electronic records. When PROJECT is complete, it is intended that the appropriate documents be transferred to the appropriate PARTIES in a format that is compatible with existing filing systems. 171. To develop warranty terms and requirements to be included in the RFP, or in the AB 115 AMENDMENT, to incorporate PROJECT, as applicable. 172. If required by the STATE STANDARDS governing Freeway Agreements, COMMISSION shall prepare and STATE shall execute Freeway Agreements with the local agencies for PROJECT. Freeway Agreements shall be executed prior to issuance of a notice to proceed to the DESIGN -BUILDER. 173. Freeway Maintenance Agreements, if necessary, shall be executed prior to the STATE's acceptance of RELIEF OF MAINTENANCE for PROJECT. 174. That STATE shall issue encroachment permits for utility improvements which lie within the SHS right-of-way by individual utility owner, not by individual relocation. PROJECT specific utility agreements will be negotiated between the COMMISSION and the individual utility owners, with work orders addressing individual relocations coordinated between the DESIGN -BUILDER and the utility owners. 175. That COMMISSION shall not start PROJECT construction until and unless environmental review under CEQA and NEPA are first completed, PROJECT approval — if any — is granted, right-of-way has been secured in such area, all pre -construction environmental surveys and mitigation completed for the area(s) proposed for construction have been completed and legal and physical control of rights of way have been acquired in accordance with the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 176. That PROJECT may be segmented to allow construction to be completed in phases based upon right-of-way availability, in compliance with applicable State and federal acquisition and relocation policies. If applicable, to meet the right-of-way availability requirements for construction, right-of-way segment certification will be performed by 17336.00034\30607232.5 29 272 District Agreement 08-1679 segment, section, or parcel groupings. If applicable, the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS will include language that provides that construction will not commence until all property is acquired and relocation of the occupants have been completed in each defined phase or segment. 177. That during the construction of PROJECT, representatives of COMMISSION and STATE will cooperate and consult with each other, and all work pursuant to PROJECT shall be accomplished according to the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. Satisfaction of these requirements shall be verified by STATE's representative who is authorized to enter COMMISSION property during construction for the purpose of monitoring, inspecting, and coordinating construction and post -construction activities. 178. That any and all material changes to the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS shall be approved by STATE in advance of performing the work. If STATE does not provide its comments, complete its reviews or provide its approval in accordance with the requirements of the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, including the PROJECT timelines and schedules, the provisions of SECTION II, shall apply. 179. Unless otherwise directed by STATE representative, changes authorized as provided herein will not require an encroachment permit rider. The foregoing does not preclude deviations from the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS necessitated by emergency situations or to address an immediate safety issue. STATE shall be notified, as soon as reasonably possible, of any such deviations. All changes shall be shown on the As - Built plans referred to in this AGREEMENT. 180. The PARTIES agree that under the encroachment permits to be issued for the PROJECT, COMMISSION and the DESIGN -BUILD contractor will be responsible for debris removal and general housekeeping activities to maintain the PROJECT SHS RIGHT OF WAY (except as otherwise set forth in the DESIGN -BUILD contract) and for repair of damage to STATE facilities resulting from PROJECT construction activities. 181. The PARTIES hereby agree that COMMISSION shall be the party responsible for repair or replacement of third -party caused damage that occurs within the CONSTRUCTION WORK ZONE, unless such damage is unrelated to construction activities. As used in paragraphs 181 through 189, "third -party" shall not include contractors or subcontractors of STATE or COMMISSION. Third -party caused damage that occurs within the CONSTRUCTION WORK ZONE that COMMISSION believes is unrelated to construction activities shall be handled as a potential STATE REPAIR OBLIGATION pursuant to paragraph 186 or 187 below, as applicable. 182. Consistent with Streets and Highways Code section 730 and Vehicle Code sections 17300 through 17303, the cost of damage to the State Highway System and its appurtenances may be recovered by either STATE or the authority in charge of the highway or bridge. To the extent COMMISSION is obligated to perform repair or replacement of damage to the PROJECT SHS RIGHT OF WAY or its appurtenances within the CONSTRUCTION WORK ZONE, STATE authorizes COMMISSION to 17336.00034\30607232.5 30 273 District Agreement 08-1679 take all actions to recover its costs related thereto. STATE agrees to reasonably assist in such actions, if requested by COMMISSION, and to waive any rights to recovery, except as to any direct damage to STATE not remedied by COMMISSION repair work. 183. Should COMMISSION decide not to pursue a recovery action, as described in paragraph 182 above, STATE reserves the right to do so in its own name. In such case, STATE shall reimburse COMMISSION, for any COMMISSION incurred costs related to the third -party damage, from any proceeds of such recovery action in excess of STATE's attorney and other litigation related fees. 184. In order to assist COMMISSION with repairing or replacing third -party caused damage to the PROJECT SHS RIGHT OF WAY, STATE shall, if available, provide impact attenuators, special light or sign poles, electrical cabinets, and other items from STATE's stock, as needed. Such materials provided by STATE shall be replaced in kind by COMMISSION. 185. The PARTIES hereby agree that STATE shall be the party responsible for STATE REPAIR OBLIGATIONS. Third -party caused damage that occurs outside the CONSTRUCTION WORK ZONE, but that results from construction activities within the CONSTRUCTION WORK ZONE will be handled as a STATE REPAIR OBLIGATION, but STATE reserves its right to seek compensation from COMMISSION upon proving that the construction activities were the direct cause of the third -party caused damage. 186. In the case of an emergency which requires immediate action, and which involves a potential STATE REPAIR OBLIGATION, COMMISSION shall make all reasonable efforts to contact STATE in order to determine which PARTY is responsible and best able to complete the required work. In the case of an emergency, STATE may provide verbal authorization for COMMISSION to direct the DESIGN -BUILD contractor to conduct emergency repair efforts at STATE's cost. STATE shall follow its verbal approval with a written authorization. If COMMISSION is unable to contact STATE after reasonable efforts to do so, and the nature of the emergency requires, in COMMISSION's reasonable judgment, immediate action, COMMISSION may, but shall not be obligated to, undertake a STATE REPAIR OBLIGATION to the extent required to remediate the emergency condition. In such case, COMMISSION shall notify STATE of such work at the earliest time possible, and STATE shall confirm in writing whether or not the repair work was a STATE REPAIR OBLIGATION within ten (10) days of notification. For repair work determined to be a STATE REPAIR OBLIGATION, STATE shall reimburse COMMISSION for the actual costs thereof. STATE shall reimburse COMMISSION for repair work conducted under this paragraph within thirty (30) days of receipt of COMMISSION's invoice therefor, unless otherwise agreed upon by the PARTIES. 187. In the case of third -party damage which does not require immediate action, the PARTIES shall meet and confer to determine which party is responsible for the work. If it is determined that the work is a STATE REPAIR OBLIGATION, STATE may request that COMMISSION direct the DESIGN -BUILD contractor to perform the 17336.00034\30607232.5 31 274 District Agreement 08-1679 work, and shall reimburse COMMISSION for all costs thereof. 188. The PARTIES agree that COMMISSION shall not be responsible for repair to the PROJECT SHS RIGHT OF WAY which is necessitated by (i) war, riot, acts of a public enemy or other civil disturbance, (ii) acts of God, including but not limited to, greater than a 25-year storm event, lightning, earthquakes, hailstorms, ice storms, tornados, typhoons, hurricanes, landslides, fires, and objects striking the earth from space (such as meteorites), or (iii) any other human or natural disaster specified in paragraph 208. 189. Prior to STATE undertaking any maintenance or repair work within the PROJECT SHS RIGHT OF WAY, STATE shall contact COMMISSION to coordinate its work with COMMISSION in order to avoid interference with the PROJECT. 190. That COMMISSION shall provide a contract claims process reasonably acceptable to STATE and shall process any and all claims through COMMISSION's claim process. STATE's representative will be made available to COMMISSION to provide advice and technical input in any claim process. Said representative shall not be deemed to be an agent of COMMISSION. 191. The PARTY that discovers hazardous material (HM) will immediately notify the other PARTY(IES) to this AGREEMENT. HM-1 is defined as hazardous material (including but not limited to hazardous waste) that may require removal and disposal pursuant to federal or state law, whether it is disturbed by PROJECT or not. HM-2 is defined as hazardous material (including but not limited to hazardous waste) that may require removal and disposal pursuant to federal or state law, only if disturbed by PROJECT. 192. STATE, independent of PROJECT, is responsible for any HM-1 found solely within existing SHS right of way. STATE will undertake or cause to be undertaken HM-1 management activities with minimum impact to PROJECT schedule. STATE, independent of PROJECT, will pay all costs for HM-I management activities related to HM-I found solely within existing SHS right of way. STATE shall make reasonable efforts to investigate any HM-I found within existing SHS right of way within 72 hours of notification of STATE by COMMISSION of such discovery, and shall immediately commence work with regulatory agencies to develop and implement an action plan to remediate the site. STATE shall involve COMMISSION in all meetings and work with governmental/regulatory agencies and third parties related to any HM-1 found solely within existing SHS right of way. 193. STATE has no responsibility for management activities or costs associated with HM-1 found outside the existing SHS right-of-way. COMMISSION, independent of PROJECT, is responsible for any HM-I found within PROJECT limits outside existing SHS right-of-way. COMMISSION will undertake, or cause to be undertaken, HM-1 management activities with minimum impact to PROJECT schedule, and 17336.00034\30607232.5 32 275 District Agreement 08-1679 COMMISSION will pay, or cause to be paid, all costs associated with HM-1 management activities. 194. If HM-2 is found within the limits of PROJECT, COMMISSION will be responsible for HM-2 management activities. Any management activity cost associated with HM-2 is a PROJECT cost. 195. Management activities associated with HM-1 or HM-2 include, without limitation, any necessary manifest requirements and designation of disposal facility. 196. The PARTIES agree that COMMISSION is designated as the Legally Responsible Person and the Approved Signatory Authority pursuant to the Construction General Permit, State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Order Number 2009-0009- DWQ, as defined in Appendix 5, Glossary, and assumes all roles and responsibilities assigned to the Legally Responsible Person and the Approved Signatory Authority as mandated by the Construction General Permit. 197. STATE's acquisition or acceptance of title to any property on which any hazardous material is found will proceed in accordance with the applicable FHWA STANDARDS and STATE STANDARDS. 198. That pursuant to the authority contained in Section 591 of the Vehicle Code for areas within the limits of PROJECT that are open to public traffic, COMMISSION shall comply with all of the requirements set forth in Divisions 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 of the Vehicle Code. COMMISSION shall take all necessary precautions for safe operation of COMMISSION vehicles, the construction contractor's equipment and vehicles and/or vehicles of personnel retained by COMMISSION, and for the protection of the traveling public from injury and damage from such vehicles or equipment. 199. STATE will accept control and operate and maintain, at its own cost and expense, those segments of the NON -TOLL PROJECT FACILITIES lying within the SHS right-of- way upon granting of RELIEF OF MAINTENANCE, except local roads delegated to local agencies for maintenance. Upon granting of RELIEF OF MAINTENANCE by STATE of the NON -TOLL PROJECT FACILITIES, STATE shall also be deemed to exercise ownership and control of those facilities for which RELIEF OF MAINTENANCE has been granted. 200. Use, operation and maintenance of the TOLL FACILITY shall be the subject of an amendment to the TOLL FACILITY Agreement for the I-15 Project between COMMISSION and STATE. 201. Upon issuance of an encroachment permit to COMMISSION's DESIGN -BUILDER, and subject to paragraphs 180 through 188 of this AGREEMENT, COMMISSION shall control and maintain, at its own cost and expense, those portions of PROJECT lying within the SHS right-of-way. COMMISSION will also maintain, at COMMISSION expense, local roads within the SHS right-of-way delegated to local agencies for maintenance and remaining portions of any local road overcrossing structures, including the deck surface and above, as well as all traffic service facilities 17336.00034\30607232.5 33 276 District Agreement 08-1679 that may be required for the exclusive benefit or control of local road traffic. This responsibility will remain for each area outside of SHS right-of-way until each area has been relinquished back to local agency. This paragraph shall apply except as specifically set forth in paragraph 103. 202. That upon completion of all work under this AGREEMENT, ownership and title to materials, equipment and appurtenances installed within SHS right-of-way, excluding any toll plazas, gantries and equipment cabinets; conduit, fiber, cameras, readers, signage and supporting or related computerized communications systems; and other toll related toll operations equipment and systems, will automatically be vested in STATE, subject to the TOLL FACILITY Agreement. No further agreement will be necessary to transfer ownership as herein above stated. COMMISSION shall arrange for the transfer of ownership and title to materials, equipment and appurtenances installed outside of STATE right-of-way, excluding those materials, equipment and appurtenances owned by COMMISSION as described in the foregoing sentence, to be retained by appropriate local agencies, unless otherwise agreed to by STATE and COMMISSION in the TOLL FACILITY Agreement. 203. That nothing in the provisions of this AGREEMENT is intended to create duties or OBLIGATIONS to or rights of third parties in this AGREEMENT or affect the legal liability of either party to the AGREEMENT to third parties by imposing any standard of care with respect to the development, design, construction, operation and maintenance of SHS and public facilities different from the standard of care imposed by law or applicable STATE STANDARDS. 204. Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by COMMISSION, its contractors, sub -contractors, and/or its agents under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction conferred upon COMMISSION under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that COMMISSION, to the extent permitted by law, will defend, indemnify and save harmless STATE and all its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description including but not limited to, tortious, contractual, inverse condemnation or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by COMMISSION, its contractors, sub -contractors, and/or its agents under this AGREEMENT. 205. Neither COMMISSION nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury, damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE, its contractors, sub -contractors, and/or its agents under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction conferred upon STATE under this AGREEMENT. It is understood and agreed that, STATE, to the extent permitted by law, will defend, indemnify and save harmless COMMISSION and all its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description including but not limited to, tortious, contractual, inverse condemnation or other theories or assertions of liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be 17336.00034\30607232.5 34 277 District Agreement 08-1679 done by STATE, its contractors, sub -contractors, and/or its agents under this AGREEMENT. 206. Notwithstanding any other term of this AGREEMENT, existing corridor utility service expenses, including water and electrical, shall remain the responsibility of STATE, whereas COMMISSION will be responsible for utility service expenses when modifying existing utilities. COMMISSION will not utilize existing STATE sources for any temporary connection, unless otherwise approved by STATE. 207. That no alteration, or variation of the terms of this AGREEMENT shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the PARTIES hereto and no oral understanding or agreement which is not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the PARTIES hereto. 208. A party is not liable for failure to perform the party's OBLIGATIONS if such failure is as a result of Acts of God (including fire, flood, earthquake, storm, hurricane or other natural disaster), war, invasion, act of foreign enemies, hostilities (regardless of whether war is declared), civil war, rebellion, revolution, insurrection, military or usurped power or confiscation, terrorist activities, nationalization, government sanction, blockage, embargo, labor dispute, strike, lockout or interruption. 209. In the event of damage caused by third parties which may require repair or other remedial response, the PARTIES agree to coordinate to determine which PARTY is responsible for the repair or remedial action; which PARTY's forces or agents are most appropriate to perform the remedial action; and what the mechanism for reimbursement may be. To the extent STATE does not exercise its authority to seek recovery of response costs from third parties, STATE expressly authorizes COMMISSION to exercise any and all authority conferred as result of Vehicle Code sections 17000- 17303 with respect to actions to recover response costs. 210. If the PARTIES are unable to reach agreement on a particular issue, including concerns over timeliness of submittal reviews or performance of REIMBURSED WORK, the PARTIES agree to promptly follow a mutually agreed upon issue resolution process. The issue resolution process may take the form similar to the Issue Escalation Ladder shown in Exhibit H. The final form and content of the issue resolution process will be mutually developed prior to commencement of construction. The primary objective of the issue resolution process is timely decision making. 211. To form an Executive Oversight Committee (EOC) as part of the issue resolution process. The EOC will be available to provide direction to the PROJECT team when issues are elevated to the EOC. The EOC will be the final step in the PROJECT level dispute resolution process. The primary objective of the EOC will be to ensure that PROJECT stays on schedule and issues are resolved in a timely manner. The EOC will meet on an as -needed basis to resolve issues that otherwise threaten to delay the overall PROJECT schedule or adversely impact PROJECT costs. An EOC Charter has been signed by COMMISSION, STATE and FHWA and is attached as Exhibit I. STATE is defined in the Charter as Department. 17336.00034\30607232.5 35 278 District Agreement 08-1679 212. That no waiver of any claim, defense or obligation shall be imputed to either party as a result of that party's failure or delay in assertion of said claim, defense or obligation. 213. This AGREEMENT will terminate upon COMPLETION OF WORK or upon 30 calendar days' written notification to terminate and acceptance between STATE and COMMISSION, whichever occurs first. In addition, either PARTY may terminate this AGREEMENT on 30 calendar days' written notification should SB 132 PROJECT FUNDS no longer be available for the PROJECT, and no other funding source is identified, or if the PROJECT is not environmentally approved. However, all OBLIGATIONS to pay amounts accrued or due and payable as of the date of termination, indemnification, document retention, audit, claims, environmental commitment, legal challenge, ownership articles and other provisions that, by their express terms survive termination or expiration of this AGREEMENT, will remain in effect until terminated or modified in writing by mutual agreement. 214. To the extent required by FHWA for any contracts amended pursuant to AB 115, COMMISSION will operate under the STATE Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program, and will develop contract specific DBE goals for the applicable I-15 PROJECT contracts with subcontracting opportunities including the DESIGN -BUILD contract. COMMISSION will report its DBE participation on the PROJECT through STATE. As the PROJECT is solely State funded, DBE requirements are not otherwise applicable to the PROJECT. 215. Notwithstanding Section III, paragraph 207, or any other provision of this AGREEMENT, the PARTIES, or either of them, may change the funding source allocations set forth above without an amendment to this AGREEMENT. 216. If any portion of this AGREEMENT is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 217. PARTIES agree to sign a CLOSURE STATEMENT to terminate this AGREEMENT. However, all indemnification, document retention, audit, claims, environmental commitment, legal challenge, maintenance and ownership articles will remain in effect until terminated or modified in writing by mutual agreement or expire by the statute of limitations. 218. PARTIES intend this AGREEMENT to be their final expression that supersedes any oral understanding or writings pertaining to the OBLIGATIONS. 219. Attached Exhibits A through I are incorporated into this AGREEMENT by reference. 17336.00034\30607232.5 36 279 District Agreement 08-1679 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR FOR DESIGN -BUILD OF THE INTERSTATE 15/91 EXPRESS LANE CONNECTOR (ELC) STATE OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION wo John Bulinski District 8 Director APPROVED AS TO FORM AND PROCEDURE: WE Glenn B. Mueller Assistant Chief Counsel CERTIFIED AS TO FUNDS: District Budget Manager CERTIFIED AS TO FINANCIAL TERMS AND POLICIES: Accounting Administrator Anne E. Mayer Executive Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: Best Best & Krieger LLP COMMISSION General Counsel 17336.00034\30607232.5 37 District Agreement 08-1679 FUNDING SUMMARY June 2018 Funding Funding Fund R/W RIW Capital CON Capital CON and Final Subtotal Funds Source Partner Type Support Design Support Type SB 132 COMMISSION State $110, 000 $1,100, 000 $127, 490, 000 $51, 300, 000 $180, 000, 000 Funds Notwithstanding SECTION III, or any other provision of the Agreement, the PARTIES, or either of them, may change the funding source allocations and/or identified funding sources set forth above without an amendment to the Agreement. 17336.00034\30607232.5 38 281 District Agreement 08-1679 Exhibit A PROJECT DESCRIPTION The PROJECT will construct an express lanes median direct connector from southbound I-15 to westbound SR-91 and from eastbound SR-91 to northbound I-15 in the City of Corona. In addition, the Project proposes operational improvements along the eastbound SR-91 from west of I-15 to Promenade Avenue. (Figure 1 Vicinity Map). Project Limits Figure 1: 1-15/SR-91 Express Lanes Connector Project Vicinity Map 17336.00034\30607232.5 39 i District Agreement 08-1679 Exhibit B PROJECT FUNDING RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX Description Performing Agency Reimbursed Work Fund Source Agency -1 Agency-2 Agency —1 Agency - 2 State Funds Construction Capital COMMISSION No X Construction Management COMMISSION No X Construction Inspection AB401 - STATE Yes X Construction Oversight standard STATE No X Right -Of -Way Capital COMMISSION No X Utility Relocation COMMISSION No X R/W Acquisition Support Services COMMISSION No X R/W Acquisition Oversight standard STATE No X Design Design Plan Development (Design -Builder) COMMISSION No X Design Reviews of D/B Provided Plans COMMISSION No X Design Oversight enhanced STATE Yes X Design Oversight standard STATE No X Misc SOURCE INSPECTION METS STATE Yes X 17336.00034\30607232.5 40 283 District Agreement 08-1679 Exhibit C PROJECT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART [attached behind this page] 17336.00034\30607232. 5 41 284 District Agreement 08-1679 1-15 /SR 91 Express Lanes Connector Project Construction organizational Chart Toll Program Director Sr. Traffic Manager 15 Corridor OTreetor Project Manager DO Projcct Manager Toll Project Manager Design Mgr. Tolfing/Oper. Mgr. contracts Manager Project Controls Mgr. Construction Mgr. +mmmmmmq� RCTC/ KIVI-PROD ECT 5 PON 50 R CALTRANS-OWNER & PARTNER OS = Oversight Construction IQA Mgr. Oversight Testing TESTER TESTER TESTER TESTER Roadway Sr. RE Sr. Roadway OS Mgr.J Structures Rep. Sr. Structures OS Mgr. 7MATERIALS VEY Roadway Assistant G MS ASSISTANT RE SSnlctures Rep. .LAgj INSPECTOR INSPECTOR 7.SOURCEINSPECTiON R. PLANT IN SPECTION INSPECTOR INSPECTOR s. tAnOR GUMP110ut INSPECTOR INSPECTOR 10.SAEETY 11.GEOTECH 12.HARU5CAPE I I 17336.00034\30607232. 5 42 285 District Agreement 08-1679 Exhibit D REIMBURSED WORK SUMMARY IAl_Vl.[fill :-1&91ITiIAiI_ .Vil Enhanced Oversight 14,356 0 14,356 Design Construction OS 0 0 0 IQA - Inspection 0 26,127 26,127 M ETS 0 11,204 11,204 TOTAL 51,687 14101.19691►Iri111%I_RVA (State Funds - SB 132) Enhanced Oversight $ 2,362,046 Inspection $ - $ 2,362,046 Design Construction OS $ - $ - $ - IQA - Inspection $ - $ 3,356,879 $ 3,356,879 METS $ - $ 1,568,560 $ 1,568,560 SUBTOTAL $ 2,362,046 $ 4,925,439 $ 7,287,485 Escalation (3%) $ 218,625 Contingency (5%) $ 364,375 Total Contingency (8%) $ 583,000 TOTAL $ 7,870,485 17336.00034\30607232. 5 43 :• District Agreement 08-1679 Exhibit E STATE BETTERMENTS SUMMARY There are no STATE requested BETTERMENTS identified at this time. 17336.00034\30607232.5 44 287 District Agreement 08-1679 Exhibit F STATE FURNISHED MATERIAL (SFM) There is no STATE FURNISHED MATERIAL identified at this time. 17336.00034\30607232.5 45 288 District Agreement 08-1679 Exhibit G COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CLOSURE STATEMENT STATE and COMMISSION agree that all scope, cost and schedule commitments included in the Cooperative Agreement for DESIGN -BUILD of the Interstate 15/State Route 91 Express Lane Connector entered into as of , 2018 (the "Agreement") have been completed. As of the date this COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CLOSURE STATEMENT has been executed by the representatives of the PARTIES, as set forth below, the Agreement shall terminate. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1.2 District 8 Director Date: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION M. Executive Director Date: 17336.00034\30607232.5 46 289 District Agreement 08-1679 Exhibit H ESCALATION LADDER 15/91 ELC DESIGN -BUILD PROJECT ISSUE RESOLUTION LADDER COMMISSION STATE LEVEL I -FIELD Construction Design Construction Design name (TBD) name (TBD) name (TBD) name (TBD) District name (TBD) name (TBD) Structures name (TBD) name (TBD) LEVEL II - PROJECT MANAGERS David Thomas Daniel Ciacchella LEVEL III - SPONSORS Michael Blomquist Jesus Galvan LEVEL IV — EXECUTIVES (EOC) Anne Mayer John Bulinski 17336.00034\30607232.5 47 290 District Agreement 08-1679 Exhibit I EXECUTIVE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE CHARTER Executive Oversight Committee CHARTER June 2018 VISION: To successfully implement and deliver the 15/91 Express Lanes Connector (ELC) Project in Riverside and Orange Counties. PROJECT LOCATION: The PROJECT will construct an Express Lanes median direct connector from southbound Interstate 15 (I-15) to westbound State Route 91 (SR 91) and from eastbound SR 91 to northbound I-15 in the City of Corona. The project also adds tolled Express Lane in each direction of I-15 from the 15/91 ELC to Hidden Valley Parkway; adds a tolled express lane in each direction of SR 91 from east of Lincoln Avenue to the 15/91 ELC; extends the tolled Express Lane along eastbound SR 91 from I-15 to west of Promenade Avenue; and extends eastbound auxiliary lane along SR 91 from west of I-15 to west of Promenade Avenue. The project also includes the addition of Toll Collection System infrastructure and advance signage along I-15 and SR 91. The PROJECT will pass through the cities of Corona and Norco, and portions of unincorporated Riverside and Orange Counties. EXECUTIVE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (EOCI PURPOSE: An Executive Oversight Committee (EOC) has been established to provide guidance to the PROJECT team when issues arise that may affect the overall PROJECT direction. The EOC consists of the executives from four partnering agencies — Riverside County Transportation Commission (COMMISSION) Executive Director, STATE District 8 Director, STATE Chief Engineer/Deputy Director, and the FHWA Associate Division Administrator. The EOC provides overall PROJECT direction and convenes, when necessary, to resolve conflicts. Before an issue is brought to the committee, staff members from the parties will attempt a resolution based on a formal partnering program to be implemented for the PROJECT. The objective of the issue resolution process is to resolve issues collaboratively and timely at the lowest possible level, resulting in less adverse impacts to PROJECT cost and schedule. PROJECT PURPOSE: The primary purpose of the PROJECT is to address current and future travel demand and improve traffic operations on the I-15 corridor and the SR 91 corridor between the 15/91 Interchange and Hidden Valley Parkway along I-15 and between Lincoln Avenue and South Promenade Avenue along SR 91. The PROJECT is intended to improve existing and future mobility on I-15. Secondary objectives include reducing safety conflicts on I- 15 and SR 91, expanding travel choice, increasing express lane system continuity, and contributing to improved air quality. BACKGROUND: This portion of I-15 and SR 91 has been identified as a corridor that needs capacity improvements to address existing and projected capacity deficiencies from the accelerated growth and development that has taken place in communities along the I-15 corridor, and is expected to continue. 17336.00034\30607232.5 48 291 District Agreement 08-1679 In the spring of 2006, COMMISSION assessed the feasibility of tolling four freeway corridors in Riverside County and concluded that portions of the SR-91 and I-15 corridors were generally feasible for tolling from a financial, traffic operation, and engineering standpoint. In 2009, COMMISSION received federal tolling authority for I-15 through FHWA's Value Pricing Pilot Program. The approved PROJECT focuses on providing a median direct connector for tolled express lanes from southbound I-15 to westbound 91 and from eastbound SR 91 to northbound I- 15. The PROJECT is being cleared with a Revalidation of the approved SR 91 CIP environmental document which is a California Environmental Quality Act Environmental Impact Report and a National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact. COMMISSION will perform both final engineering and construction of this PROJECT using a single design -build contract pursuant to Section 26(b) of AB 115 (Chapter 20, Statutes of 2017). A separate tolling contract will be procured by COMMISSION to perform toll systems integration and toll operations and maintenance pursuant to Section 26(b) of AB 115 (Chapter 20, Statues of 2017). DELIVERABLES: The committee will meet on an as -needed basis to resolve issues that otherwise threaten to delay the overall PROJECT schedule or adversely impact PROJECT costs. SUCCESS CRITERIA: PROJECT Success will be defined as achieving the following milestones: • Award of the TSP contract amendments by October 11, 2018; • Award of the Design -Build contract amendments by January 10, 2019; • Opening of the 15/91 Express Lanes Connector to traffic in June 2021; and • Construction Contract Acceptance by the end of 2021. 17336.00034\30607232.5 49 292 AGENDA ITEM 8L RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: 2018 State Route 91 Implementation Plan STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the 2018 State Route 91 Implementation Plan. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 2002, AB 1010 authored by former Assemblyman Lou Correa allowed the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to purchase the 91 Express Lanes franchise from the California Private Transportation Company. OCTA completed the purchase agreement in January 2003, at a cost of $207.5 million. AB 1010 also eliminated the existing non -compete clause in the franchise agreement that prohibited any capacity -enhancing improvements from being made to SR-91 until the year 2030. The purchase of the 91 Express Lanes and the elimination of the non -compete clause allowed much needed improvements to be planned and implemented within the SR-91 corridor. Caltrans Districts 8 and 12, the Commission, and OCTA have been coordinating these improvements. In 2008, SB 1316's passage authorized an extension of OCTA's tolling authority to 2065 and for the Commission to impose tolls and fees for 50 years on transportation facilities and to use toll revenues to construct, operate, and maintain toll facilities on SR-91 in Riverside County. SB 1316 also required the creation of the State Route 91 Advisory Committee with specific responsibilities composed of board members from the Commission and OCTA. SB 1316 also required the continuation of annual updates of an implementation plan of SR-91 improvements for the Legislature initially required under AB 1010. Consistent with the legislation, OCTA and the Commission in consultation with Caltrans completed the 2018 State Route 91 Implementation Plan (attached). The plan details proposed projects and completion schedules for transportation improvements to Metrolink, express bus, express lanes, freeways and interchanges, new east -west highway corridors, and high-speed rail. SB 1316 grants the Commission the authority to expend tolls and fees on capital costs, operations and maintenance, repair and rehabilitation, debt financing costs, and administration. Any tolls and fees generated in excess of the expenditure needs previously listed may be spent on Agenda Item 8L 293 transportation needs within the State Route 91 corridor from the Orange County line to Interstate 15. These transportation needs include transit capital, transit operations, and State Highway capital improvements for both toll and non -tolled improvements. As part of its annual budget approval process, separate but concurrent with this item, the Commission will approve the use of tolls and fees generated from its 91 Express Lanes operations. Staff anticipates bringing to the Commission for approval a toll surplus expenditure plan in fall 2018 with a summary of any excess revenue and its proposed use. Lastly, staff posted on the Commission's web site the SR-91 Implementation Plan for public review and comment on May 14, 2018 for 30 days per S131316. Attachment: 2018 State Route 91 Implementation Plan Agenda Item 8L 294 m RCTC Every year since 2002, OCTA, RCTC, and stakeholders have worked collaboratively to review a program of projects along the SR-91 corridor. BENEFITS — Orange County Riverside County Bi-County • Provides seamless connectivity between Orange and Riverside Counties • Increases travel options • Optimizes vehicle throughput • Reinvests net revenues on the SR-91 corridor to improve regional mobility • Investments to date: $1.9 billion Eastbound Lane Addition (SR-241 to SR-71) $51.2 Fifth Lane Addition (SR-55 to SR-241) $85.2 IL Westbound Lane at Tustin Avenue $43.3 Green River Road Overcrossing $24.3 I I' North Main Street Corona Metrolink Parking Structure $25 I I' 91 Corridor Improvement Project (Initial Phase) $1,407 Metrolink Service Improvements $249 Orange County SR-91 Improvements (SR-57 to SR-55) I i $250 to $350 Fairmont Improvements $76.8 _ Riverside County 1-15/SR-91 North Connector $180 ' SR-71/SR-91 Interchange $123.4 Improvements East of 1-15 TBD Bi-County Express Bus Service $5.g Metrolink Stations and Service 6th General Purpose Lane Addition (SR-241 to SR-71) TBD RCTC Operational Improvements TBD $181 SR-91/SR-241 Connector LOCATION Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR-241 to 1-15 (Post-2035) I I $2,720 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail (Post-2035) $2,770 - $3,200 _ Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-Lane Facility from SR-241/SR-133 to 1-15/Cajalco Road (Post-2035) $8,855 WB SR-91 to SB SR-55 Connector Improvements (Post-2035) $75 - $150 EB SR-91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR-241 $31 Orange County Transportation Authori# 5u550 S. Main Street Orange, CA 92868 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLEOF CONTENTS............................................................................................................................................I SECTION 1: 2017 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE............................................................................................1 SECTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.................................................................................................................8 ORANGECOUNTY PROJECTS.............................................................................................................................9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROJECTS........................................................................................................................12 BI-COUNTY PROJECTS.......................................................................................................................................16 SECTION 3: APPENDIX A - POST-2035 AND CONCEPTUAL PROJECTS.......................................................22 SECTION 4: APPENDIX B - COMPLETED PROJECT EXHIBITS.......................................................................28 SECTION 5: REFERENCES..................................................................................................................................36 A Lw7- 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 297 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 201 8 STATUS REPORT AND UPDATE Previous law authorized the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to enter into franchise agreements with private companies to construct and operate four demonstration toll road projects in California. This resulted in the development of the 91 Express Lanes facility in Orange County. The four -lane, 10-mile toll road runs along the median of State Route 91 (SR-91) in northeast Orange County between the Orange/Riverside County line and State Route 55 (SR 55). Since the 91 Express Lanes carried its first vehicle on December 27, 1995, the facility has saved users tens of millions of hours of conTnuting time. V\hile the 91 Express Lanes facility has improved travel time along the SR-91 corridor, provisions in the franchise agreement between Caltrans and the private franchisee, the California Private Transportation Company (CFTC), prohibited Caltrans and county transportation agencies from adding transportation capacity or operational improvements to the SR-91 corridor through the year 2030 from Interstate 15 (1-15) in Riverside County to the Orange/Los Angeles Counties border. Consequently, the public agencies were barred from adding new lanes, improving interchanges, and adding other improvements to decrease congestion on the SR-91 freeway. Recognizing the need to eliminate the non-oompete provision of the franchise agreement, Governor Gray Davis signed Assernbly Bill 1010 (Lou Correa) (AB 1010) into law in September 2002, paving the way for much - needed congestion relief for thousands of drivers wtio use SR-91 to travel between Riverside and Orange Counties each day. The gill allowed the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to purchase the 91 Express Lanes franchise and eliminate the existing clause that prohibited any capacity -enhancing improvements from being made to SR-91 until the year 2030. The purchase agreement for the 91 Express Lanes was completed on January 3, 2003, placing the road in public hands at a cost of $207.5 million. VUth the elimination of the non -compete provision through AB 1010 and the subsequent 91 Express Lanes purchase by OCTA, Orange County and Riverside County public officials and Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 have been coordinating improvement plans for SR-91. Senate Bill 1316 (Lou Correa) (SB 1316) was signed into law in September 2008 as an update to the provisions of AB 1010. SIB 1316 authorizes OCTA to transfer its rights and interests in the Riverside County portion of SR-91 toll lanes by assigning them to the Rverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC), and authorizes RCTC to impose tolls for 50 years. In 2017, RCTC opened to traffic the extension of the 91 Express Lanes into Riverside County with cornpletion of the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (see Section 4 - Appendix B). SIB 1316 also requires OCTA and RCTC to issue an annual SR-91 Implementation Plan (Plan) and a proposed cornpletion schedule for SR-91 improvements from State Route 57 (SR 57) to 1-15. The Plans prior to adoption of SIB 1316 included a westerly project limit of SR 55. The Plan establishes a program of projects eligible for funding by the use of potential excess toll revenue and other funds. This 2018 Plan is the result of the requirement to provide the State Legislature with an annual Implementation Flan for SR-91 improvements and builds on the 2017 report. This year's update includes projects that were identified in the 2006 Riverside County - Orange County Major Investment Study (MS) as well as other project development efforts and funding programs such as the RCTC 10-Year Western County Highway Delivery Flan that outlines a number of projects such as the extension of High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes from the Orange/Riverside County line to 1-15, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) that provides a funding source for transportation projects, the extension of the Measure A program that provides funding for transportation projects in Riverside County, and OC Go (formerly Measure M) that provides funding for transportation projects in Orange County. The 2018 Plan includes an overview, identification of issues and needs, and time frames for project packages to improve mobility 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN on SR-91. Project descriptions include conceptual lane diagrams (as appropriate), cost estimates (in 2018 dollars, or as noted), and discussion of key considerations that need to be addressed in the planning and development of each project. This Plan will provide OCTA and RCTC with a framlewak to implement SR-91 and other related improvements. Future annual Plan updates will continue to refine the scope, cost, and schedule of each project included in this version of the Plan. 91 EXPRESS LANES TOLL POLICY GOALS \Nth the completion of the State Route 91 Candor Improvement Project's initial phase in spring 2017, there is now approximately 18 miles of Express Lanes between Orange and Riverside counties. OCTA and RCTC have adopted goals for the 91 Express Lanes to continue to maintain a safe, reliable, and predictable travel time for motorists traversing seamlessly between the two counties. These guiding principles include: • optirrizing vehicle throughput at free flow speeds; increasing average vehicle occupancy; • balancing capacity and demand to serve customers who pay tolls as wall as carpoolers (3+) who are offered discounted tolls; • paying debt service and maintaining debt service coverage; • generating sufficient revenue to sustain the financial viability of the 91 Express Lades; and • when appropriate, reinvesting net revenues on the SR-91 corridor to improve regional mobility. The Riverside County portion of the 91 Express Lanes began operation in March 2017. Throughout the first year of operation, RCTC made minor operational improvements to improve the SR-91 corridor travel between State Route 241 (SR 241) and McKnley Street. RCTC is now considering additional improvements that may be needed to further enhance efficiency on the SR-91 corridor between SR 241 and McKnley Street. These improvements may enhance operations for general purpose lanes, express lanes, and local arterials. RCTC is currently waking with Caltrans and OCTA to determine Mat operational improvements (if any) should be made and how best to implement these operational enhancements. It is also important to note that 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN gang forward, other improvements along the SR-91 corridor should be phased in such a way that will "do no harm" to the operations of the 91 Express Lanes and the candor at large. Therefore, as information for projects in this Plan is updated annually, it is important to ensure each project is sequenced in such a way that it provides mlaArnum benefits to the SR-91 corridor. This can be achieved by implementing the projects at the time which optimizes the operations of the corridor and 91 Express Lanes. PROJECT ACCOMPLISHMENTS Much progress has been made since the initial 2003 SR-91 Implementation Plan was approved. The 2018 Plan includes select completed project exhibits as a historical reference, see Section 4 - Appendix B. Corroeted Construidionlirrprovernent Projects As of June 2018, the following improvements have been constructed or implemented: Repave and seal pavement surfaces, restripe, and replace raised channelizers on the 91 Express Lanes. EB SR-91 restripe and median barrier reconstruction project that removed the CHP enforcement area and extended the EB auxiliary lane from SR 71 to the Serfas Club Drive off -ramp. ❖ VWB auxiliary lane extension between the County line and SR 241. This project eliminated the lane drop at the 91 Express Lanes and extended the existing auxiliary lane from the County line to SR 241 in the westbound direction. This improvement minimized the traffic delays at the lane drop area, resulting in improved vehicle progression. ❖ VWB restripe project extended the auxiliary lane between SR 71 and the County line resulting in a new continuous auxiliary lane between SR 71 & SR 241. Express Bus improvements are imrplernented for the Galleria at Tyler to South Coast Metro route and Village at Orange to Riverside/Corona. Safety Improvements at the Truck Scales. Existing shoulders were in -proved, lanes were re -striped, illumination improved, and signage was modified into and out of the EB facilities. Green River Road overcrossing replacement (See Section 4). I 299 V' Metrolink parking structure at the North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station (See Section 4). V' EB SR-91 lane addition from SR 241 to SR 71 (See Section 4). V' Additional SR-91 WB and EB travel lane between SR 55 and SR 241 (See Section 4). V' SR-91 WB bypass lane to Tustin Avenue at SR 55 (See Section 4). V' Metrolink Service Improvements (See Section 4). V' Initial SR-91 CIP that will widen SR-91 by one GP lane in each direction east of Green River Rd, add collector -distributor (CD) roads and direct south connectors at I-15/SR 91, extend the 91 Express Lanes to 1-15, and provide system/local interchange improvements. This project allay is RCTC to operate toll lanes on SR-91 within Riverside County (See Section 4). These projects provide enhanced freeway capacity and/or improved mobility for one of the most congested segments of SR-91. The completed EB SR-91 lane addition project from SR 241 to SR 71 (See Section 4) has greatly enhanced highway operations. This accounts for some of the improvement in exsting EB p.m peak hour travel time from approximately 70+ minutes in 2010 to approximately 50 minutes in 2014 (for the baseline travel time). In addition, there are two projects that have a direct impact upon SR-91 widening projects. The first is the $2 billion U.S. Amer Corps of Engineers (Corps) Santa Ana River Mainstem (SAPM improvement project that provides flood protection from the recently improved Prado Dam (near SR 71) to the Pacific Ocean. As part of the Corps' project, existing riverbanks have been improved due to the increased capacity of the Prado Dam outlet works, which can now release up to 30,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) compared to the previous facility capacity of 10,000 cfs. The only remaining segments of the Santa Ana River to be improved are Reach 9 Phase 2A which includes areas along SR-91 from just east of the Coal Canyon Wildlife Corridor Crossing to SR 71, and segments along Whir Canyon Road near Savi Ranch. SR-91 project design teams have coordinated with the Corps, Caltrans, and other federal, regional, and local agencies in order to accommodate future SR-91 improvements by the Corps bank protection project within Reach 9 Phase 2B by relocating the Santa Ana River. This has greatly enhanced the ability of Caltrans and other regional transportation agencies to implement many of the SR-91 improvement projects listed herein. The Corps SARM Reach 9 Phase 2B improvements were under construction as of September 2009 with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) "stimulus" funding and construction was finalized in April 2015. Environmental rtigation within the Santa Ana River perennial stream habitat restoration area will continue for another six years of the nine-year mitigation program The other project with a direct impact to SR-91 is the $120 million Santa Ana Regional Interceptor (SAR) sewer trunk line relocation. The existing SAR line is within the Santa Ana River floodplain and was in jeopardy of failure due to scour from the potential increased flood releases by the aforementioned Corps project. In order to relocate the proposed 48-inch diameter SARI line outside of the floodplain, which is immediately adjacent to SR-91, Caltrans highway R/W was relinquished to the Orange County Rood Control District (CCFCD) for location of the SARI line. SR-91 project teams have coordinated with the OCFCD, Caltrans, and other federal, regional, and local agencies in order to accommodate planned SR-91 improvements within the remaining State R/W subsequent to relinquishment. This project completed the construction phase in mid-2014. The WB SR-91 Widening Project completed construction in 2016 from State College Blvd to Interstate 5 (1-5). This project added one WB general purpose lane and removed the dedicated exit lane to State College Blvd from the SIB SR 57 to WB SR-91 Connector that was causing operational issues due to the short weaving distance. While this project falls just to the west of the limits for the Plan study area, it will have an influence on operations within the Plan area. The most recently completed project has provided significant benefits to drivers on SR-91, the Initial GP. This $1.4 billion investment project included widening SR- 91 by one GP lane in each direction east of Green River Road, adding collector -distributor (CD) roads and direct south connectors at 1-15/SR 91, extending the 91 Express Lanes to 1-15, and providing systernflocal interchange improvements. The new lanes and other improvements are expected to save time, offer choice and reliability, boost safety, enhance access and job creation, promote ddeshadng, reduce pollution and aid the movement of goods along the region's roadways. Corroeted Designs and other Reports In addition to the physical improvements in the corridor, there are various project development phase documents (Feasibility Reports, Studies, PSR, PANED, or PS&E) that are oompleted, or are in draft form and antidpated to be approved that identify improvements that will provide 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 300 improved mobility. These documents include (also see Section 5): ❖ MIS- Final Project Report: Locally Preferred Strategy Report (January 2006). ❖ Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan (November 2006). ❖ Project Study Report for SR 71/SR-91 Interchange (December 2006). ❖ RCTC 10-Year Western County Highway Delivery Plan (December 2006). ❖ SR 91/Faim-ont Boulevard Feasibility Study (Decerber 2009). ❖ Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Orange County SR-91 Corridor Final Report (August 2010). ❖ Renewed Measure M Early Action Plan, approved August 2007 and subsequently renamed as the Capital Action Plan (April 2011). ❖ PSR PDS for SR 241/SR-91 Connector (January 2012). ❖ PS&E for Initial SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (GP) Project (2014). ❖ PSR PDS on SR-91 between SR 57 and SR 55 (October 2014). ❖ Measure M Next 10 Delivery Plan (Next 10 Plan), (November 2016). ❖ Project Report & Environmental Document for SR 241/91 Express Connector (anticipated approval late 2018). Updates from the 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan In addition to the improvements and progress noted above, the following items that were included in the 2017 SR-91 Implementation Plan have been modified for the 2018 Plan update: ❖ Projects are grouped based on County jurisdiction. ❖ The Ultimate SR-91 GP project has been split into two separate projects for 2018, including the &h General Purpose Lane Addition from SR 241 to SR 71, and improvements east of 1-15. ❖ A new project has been added for 2018 for RCTC Operational Improvements within the SR-91 corridor to enhance the recently completed SR-91 GP project. ❖ Various project descriptions, costs, and schedules 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN have been updated from the 2017 Plan based on continued project development. ❖ Travel time analysis now includes existing year and 2035 horizon year. SR-91 CORRIDOR CONDITIONS Project Limits The project study limits encompass the segment of SR-91 from west of the junction of SR 57 and SR-91 in the City of Anaheim in Orange County, to east of the junction of SR-91 and 1-15 in the Oty of Corona in Rverside County. The freeway segment is approximately 20.3 miles long, and includes approximately 12.7 miles within Orange County and approximately 7.6 miles within Rverside County. Traffic Conditions Summary A review of traffic conditions in the Corridor indicates that the existing carving capacity of the facility is inadequate to aocorrrnodate current and future peak demand volumes, and that Level of Service (LOS) F prevails in the peak direction during the entire peak period, where LOS F is defined as the worst freeway operating condition and is defined as a density of more than 45 passenger cars/lane/rile. The results also indicate that there are several physical conditions that contribute to unacceptable traffic queues. The following list summarizes the deficiencies identified along the SR-91 Corridor: ❖ Heavy traffic volumes from 1-15 (North and South) converge with SR-91 and increases delay during the peak hours. ❖ SR 71 traffic demand and trumpet interchange geometry (Type L-12) for the EB SR-91 to NB SR 71 connector contribute to mainline delays. ❖ High traffic volumes from Gypsum Canyon Road, Santa Ana Canyon Road, and Green Rver Road contribute to congestion on the mainline. A significant volume of this traffic is redirected (balanced) traffic trying to bypass mainline congestion. ❖ VWB 91 Express Lane traffic exiting to southbound (SB) SR 241 weaving across four lanes on VWB SR- 91. ❖ One of the two EB lanes from The Eastern Transportation Corridor (State Route 241) is dropped at the merge to State Rotate 91 (SR-91), causing additional congestion in the EB direction. M 301 V' Heavy traffic reentering the freeway merges at slow speeds from existing V\B and EB truck scales, impacting the general-purpose lanes. EB truck traffic must make two lane changes to stay on EB SR 91. V' SR 55 merges with SR 91. An EB lane on SR 91 is dropped (as a dedicated exit) at Lakeview Avenue and a second EB lane is dropped (as a dedicated exit) at Imperial Highway creating a weave condition. V' VbB SR 91 drops a GP lane and a 91 Express Lane to SB SR 55, which contributes to mainline congestion. This drop also occurs on the left-hand side of SR 91 as opposed to the standard right-hand connector exit. V' High demand from V\ir Canyon Road, In -pedal Highway and Lakeview Avenue increases delay during the peak hours. V' VbB traffic entering SR 91 at Lakeview Avenue to SB SR 55 contributes to mainline congestion by weaving through three lanes on VbB SR 91. V' The existing two-lane connector from V\B SR 91 to SB SR 55 is over capacity. V' There is a trap lane from EB SR 91 that teminates at SB SR 241 which creates a chokepant in the area. J 1�%rl��" ����--1�%lu��ure�� ���� Many of the highway projects and concepts identified in this 2018 Plan are based on the MIS that was completed in January 2006. The projects and concepts are presented in the following groups: Orange County Projects, Rverside County Projects and Bi-County Projects. The projects are in various stages of development such as planning, final design, construction, or procurement and implementation, as noted in the project summaries. Table 1 summarizes the various planned projects, concept projects, and completed projects in the 2018 Plan. Project groupings are described below (see Section 2 for detailed planned projects, Section 3 Appendix A for concept project summaries, and Section 4 Appendix B for completed project summaries): V' The Orange County set of projects include two improvements at a total cost from approximately $327 to $427 Trillion. The projects include the; SR 91 widening improvements between SR 57 and SR 55 and a potential new interchange or overcrossing at Fairmont Boulevard. V' The Rverside County set of projects include three improvements at a total cost of more than $300 Trillion. The improvements include a 15/91 Express Lanes Connector, the SR 71/SR 91 interchange, and the improvements east of 1-15. V' Bi-County projects which benefit both Orange and Rverside Counties include, Express Bus service improvements; Metrolink service and station improvements; a Uh General Purpose Lane Addition (SR 241 to SR 71); RCTC Operational Improvements; and a SR 241 /91 Express Connector. 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 302 5 Traffic Analysis For the 2018 Plan, the traffic analysis for major SR 91 capacity projects has been updated from the 2017 Plan. This analysis used the latest freeway operations software model available from LIC Berkeley (FREQ) and traffic data calibrated to reflect new traffic patterns since the 2017 Plan. This freeway operations model provides a better depiction of actual travel delays experienced by motorists compared to traditional travel demand models. The model can be used to analyze freeway bottlenecks sometimes neglected in traditional travel demand models. This approach is especially important given high SR 91 traffic volumes and the potential for relatively few vehicles to significantly slow down traffic. For example, a minor freeway merging area can cause many vehicles to slow, cascading delay through the traffic stream and rapidly decreasing both speed and volume for major segments of the freeway. The operations analysis quantified travel time savings for VWB morning and EB afternoon conditions for the fdlowing major capacity enhancing projects: ❖ SR 91 Improvements between SR 57 and SR 55. ❖ 15191 Express Lanes Connector. ❖ SR 71/SR 91 Interchange Improvements. ❖ SR 91 Improvements East of 1-15. ❖ Widen SR 91 by One GP Lane from SR 241 to SR 71. ❖ SR 241 /91 Express Connector. The VWB morning (a.m.) traffic analysis results indicate that for the year 2035 forecasts, travel times in Rverside County are anticipated to improve (by about 10 minutes), but increase slightly (by about 5 minutes) in Orange County. Bottlenecks are anticipated at the Orange-Rverside County line and at the SR 241 interdiange/Gypsum Canyon interchange area. A minor bottleneck is shown in the SR 55 interchange area. The main bottlenecks in Rverside County have decreased because of the completion of Table 1- SR 91 Implementation Plan Proiects =ME IChange County Projects SR 91 Improvements between SR 57 and SR 55 250-350 IFaimnont Boulevard Improvements 76.8 I SUBTOTAL 327-427 IWerside County Projects . I 15/91 Express Lanes Connector 180 I SR 71/SR 91 Interchange Improvements 123.4 SR 91 Improvements East of I-15 TBD I SUBTOTAL 303+ I. a -County Projects . Express Bus Service Improvements Between Orange 5.825 I County and Rverside County Metrolink Service and Station Improvements 55.8 I6th General Purpose Lane Addition (SR 241 to SR 71) TBD IRCTC Operational Inprovements TBD SR 241/91 Express Connector 181 I SUBTOTAL 243+ AWx . «. -. r Conceptual Proects Elevated 4-1-ane Facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR 241 2,720 to 1-15 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High 2,770- I Speed Rail 3,200 Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-Lane Fad Iityfrom 8,855 I SR 241/SR 133 to 1-15/Cajalco Road V\B SR 91 to SB SR 55 I rnprovements 75 -150 EB SR 91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR 241 31 SUBTOTAL 14,451- 14,956 B-1 Green Rver Road 0oaranssing Replaoement (March 24.3 2009) B-2 North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station Par -king 25 Structure (June 2009) B-3 Eastbound Lane Addition from SR 241 to SR 71 51.2 (Septefter 2010) B4 VVIden SR 91 between SR 55 and SR 241 by Adding a 85.2 gh GP Lane in Each Direction (January 2013) I B-5 SR 91 M Lane at Tustin Avenue (April 2016) 45.2 I IB-6 Metrolink Service Improvements (June 2016) 249 I B-7 Initial Phase GP: VUden SR-91 by One GP Lane in 1,407 Each Direction East of Green Rver Rd, CD Roads and 1-15/SR 91 Direct South Connector, Extension of Express Lanes to 1-15 and SysterTYLocal Interchange Improvements (2017) 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 6 303 proposed projects, though some congestion is still forecasted. Travel time in Orange County shows an increase in 2035 due to the growth in traffic and alleviation of bottlenecks upstream A project to address the operational aspects for the VWB SR 91 to SB SR 55 movement is included (see Concept A-4) in addition to exploring multi -modal opportunities by OCTA on, or adjacent to, the SR 91 corridor that could provide additional congestion relief. The EB evening (p.m) peak hour traffic analysis indicates that for the year 2035 forecasts, travel times in Rverside County are anticipated to increase slightly (by about 3 minutes), and gradually increase (by about 12 minutes) in Orange County. Bottlenecks appear at SR 55, at SR 241, and just before the Main Street interchange. Travel time in Orange County shows a gradual increase in 2035 due to the growth in traffic and no additional capacity enhancing projects in the areas of the bottlenecks. ICE STATUS SUMMARY The ICE concept (see Concept A-3) was conceived as part of the MIS and was established as part of a suite of projects to support future peak demand volumes between Rverside and Orange Counties. The ICE was further evaluated in 2009 for financial and geotechnical feasibility. Seven (7) primary feasibility issues were considered: ❖ Geologic, hydrogeologic/hydrologic, and gectechnical conditions. ❖ Corridor concepts (full tunnel and partial tunnel/partial surface road). ❖ Tunnel configuration. ❖ Tunnel excavation and support methods. ❖ Tunnel systems (e.g. ventilation, emergency fire system operation building, toll system, etc.). ❖ Construction considerations. ❖ Construction, Operation & Maintenance (08M) costs. At the conclusion of the financial and geotechnical feasibility study in 2010, the Rverside-Orange Corridor Authority Board (ROCA) directed staff to shelve the project due to its high construction cost and the difficult economic din -ate, and to reevaluate the concept on an annual basis during the preparation of the SR 91 Implementation Plan. The National Forest Service has continued monitoring of the ground water level along the prelirrinary alignment of the tunnel and has not found any significant changes since 2010. The technological ability to construct the large -diameter tunnels is currently available; however, the cost of tunnel boring machines (TBM) and the associated tunneling process required to construct this project has not been reduced significantly. In general, no significant changes to the seven feasibility issues considered for the ICE concept have occurred over the last eight (8) years. �.0.21 , .ti 0.2 An assessment of current economic conditions, lack of state and federal transportation funding; and the high construction cost is hampering the agility of OCTA and RCTC to implement this concept. Until considerable advancements are made in regard to efficient and affordable tunneling technology, and more state and federal funding are made available, the concept will remain a challenge to implement. 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 304 7 SECTION 2: OVERVIEW The 2018 Plan describes projects, current statuses, key consideration, benefits, and oosts (in 2018 dollars, or as noted) for major projects and concepts through Post-2035. Sorrie of the projects and concepts identified in this Implementation Plan are based on the MIS that was corrpleted in January 2006. The projects are grouped as follows: Orange County Projects, Rverside County Projects and Bi-County Projects. As the Plan is updated on an annual basis, project sequencing can be achieved in such a way that provides maximum benefits to the SR 91 corridor. The project development phases are discussed in the status updates and are defined as follows: ❖ Conceptual Engineering = Pre -Project Study Report (Pre-PSR) - Conceptual planning and engineering for project sooping and feasibility prior to initiating the PSR phase. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ❖ Preliminary Engineering = Project Study Report (PSR) - Conceptual planning and engineering phase that allows for programming of funds. ❖ Environmental = Project Approval/Environmental Document (PRIED) - The detailed concept design that provides environmental clearance for the project and programs for final design and right of way acquisition. The duration for this phase is typically 2-3 years. ❖ Design = Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS8E) - Provide detailed design to contractors for construction bidding and implementation. ❖ Construction = The project has corrpleted construction and will provide congestion relief to motorists. The intent of these Implementation Plan project packages is to provide an action list for OCTA, RCTC and Caltrans to pursue in the project development process or for initiating further studies. Figure 2-1- SR 91 Project Study Area from SR 57 to 1-15 � Bernardino i \ f NORCO CHINO I HILLS YORBA--- FULL TON LINDA PLACENTIA Plwcn a - "�,.r*,—� � CORONA , a ANAHEIM tr o� t F Foau - �� ei m r \ PARK P `\ RANG �\ GP�'IFORNI/r 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN I 305 ORANGE COUNTY PROJECTS The Orange County set of projects include two improvements at a total cost ranging from approximately $327 to $427 million. The projects include: SR 91 widening improvements between SR 57 and SR 55, and a potential new interchange or overcrossing at Fairmont Boulevard. Further details for each of the projects are included fdlowing the summary below. SR 91 between SR 57 and SR 55 250-350 Faimut Boulevard Improvements 76.8 SUBTOTAL 327427 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 306 SR-91 Improvements between SR-57 and SR-55 Diverge for WB SR-91 and S6 SR-55 Interchange improvement's Interchange improvements at Lakeview Air �. at Kraemer BIYWGlassell 51 $D 5R-55 Crop On-Ralnp Lakeview Av Kraemer Blvd Tdtbri Av sR•ss V 13 $R-91 5R-57 Oft � On State College Blvd Ott Tustin AV Of nR 5 On ON On Ori Olt On On On off Ofl On on off on f ON Do on Ulr EB SIR-91 at Kraemer Blvd GlasSell St interchange improvements On Off LEGEND Emisiing Hionway Tolled Expran Lang Inrarct}angeARamp fxlnng Lana ® HOV Lane Pfoposed Improvement Lane Project Description Improve the SR-571SR-91 interchange complex, including local interchanges, and adding capacily between SR-55 and SR-5T Ark improvement to NB SR-57 for an Ore ngethorpe Av Bypass was analyzed, but does not provide congestion relier to 5R-91; therefnrer is dFopped from, consideralion. In addition, a drop on -ramp From Lakeview Av would be Jocated between realigned WR SR-91 lanes for direct access to SB S R-55. Specific Improvements will be subject to approved plans developed in cooperation with local jurisdidons and affected communities. Improvements also include splitting the VV13 SR-91 Connector to SR-57 into separate exits and extending WB $R-91 lane addltions through State College Plvd to wren" with the euxillary lane to Raymond AY -East St. The improvements for the Build Alternative include one ES GP lane rram east of R-57 to the SR-55 connector- One WB GP lane Is added from NB 3R-57 Connemir througb the State College Blvd Interchange. An additional option was considered for W8 R-91 that included SR-57 oonnector metering Instead of the lane additions from the SR-57 connectors: however, it did not relieve traffic congestion and is not considered fur her, Gp�,tFOR.y,� 91 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Key Gonsideralions The proposed project improvements on WB and EB 5R-91 may require right-of-way acquisition- A non-standard geometric crass -section will reduce the right-of-way Impacts to partlal acquisitions only. Benefits The proposed project improvements on WB and ES SR-q1 between 5R-57 and SR-55 include, among other features, adding one EB general purpose lane to achieve lane balancing and interchange improvements, project irrlpmvements will reduce congestion and delay, and reduce weavtng- Currant Statue The projecL improvement for EB SR-91 widening and far improvements to SR-SWSR-91, Lakeview and SR-551SR-91 were studied by the SR-91 FessibOlty Study, wN0 was completed in June 2009. Preliminary enginearing was completed in 2014 and the Environmental phase began in early 2015. The proposed improvements alri-- inclLided In the OC Gv program through the Environmental phw3e, Schedule and Cost Anticipated project construction to be completed in 2025 and cost is estimated to be rrorin $250,000,000 to $350,000,000- 10 307 Fairmont Boulevard Improvements Project Description The project wautd provide a new interchange with SR-91 at Fairmont Boulevard. On and off ramps will connect Fairmont Boulevard from the north to eastbound (ES) and v atboiind (WE) SR-91. The proposed interchange does not include a wehil mlair Fairmont Boulevard connection to Santa Ana Canyon Road to the south. A pedestrian/bicycle connection is also proposed between La Palma Avenue and Santa Ana Canyon Roed- This bridge and pathay will allow for direr# Santa Aria River Trail access from both Anaheim south of SR-91 and from Yorba Linda. Key Considerations Interchange spacing and wearing issues (to SR-55) need to bo evaluated. WIdoning of SR-91 may be needed to accommodate interchange ramps. Proximity of Lhe Santa Ara River may require Lhat the wVIB ramp aunclian be located north of the river. New connection requirements and interchange spacing needs to be considered. Ramp -arid bridge placement Creeds to take pedestrian/bicycte bridge Into account, of ineorporale Itre: pedestrlanlbike path Intu the design beyimd the vehicular access limits of the project. r O 1 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Fairmont 131vel 1-EGENb r;*Ming Hlgr+way AIL 7911�!d 1=kpft?Ss Drys intefcMAngorRnmp Exieling lane ® HOY Larne ProporsFd In9myornenk I-iJrK- Benefits The interchange is expected to relieve congestion at Imperial Highway (SR-90), Lakeview Avenue, and Weir Canyon Raad Interchanges. Preliminary traffic modeling shown,a 10-15% deerease in volumes atWeir Cariyan and SR-90 interchanges with the intent# ange alternative - Current Status The City of Anaheim completed a conceptual engineering study In D$ternber 2009 for the Interchange. Muitlpld alternatives have been developed as part of the conceptual engineering study. Bicyclelpedestrian bridge Is currently in initial planning stages. Project development la pending funding identification. On JOY 24r 2017, DGTA staff along with a senior stab member of WSP presented the findings of a 91 Express Lames Intermediate access study- The study provided various eltematives, traffic: modeling, acid financial impacts of the additional access. At the conclusion of the discussion, the DCTA Board of Directors did not authorize additional analysis far the intermediate access - Schedule and Cost Anticipated project completion is 2035 and construction Bost is estimated to be S75,8W,O01). Costs from Feasibility Study (2009 dollars). RM cost is LMndetermirned at Ibis time, Cost excludes any potential impact to Santa Ana River. 11 R RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROJECTS The Rverside County set of projects indude three improvements: a 15/91 Express Lanes Connector, the SR 71/SR 91 interchange, and Improvements east of 1-15. Projects for implementation in Rverside County are expected to cost in excess of $300 million (in 2018 dollars, or as noted). 1591 EVress Lanes Camdor 180 SR 71/SR 91 InterdwW Irrprovements 123.4 SR 91 Inp vwff is East of I-15 TBD SUBTOTAL 303+ �A4�FO 91 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 12 309 1 / 7 Express Lanes Connecter LEGEND Existing Highway Irlterchangelpamp ® HOV Lane 'A Tolled Express Larne i Existing Larne Proposed improvement Lane t� Other Improvement Projects County Uine Auto Center Dr Green River Rai On Oft On ME - Express Lanes to I-15fHresden Valley Pkwy Maple t Lincoln AY Main St i�rr oTr Carl oil otl Oir Orr On On t I t Mr i I _' TA & T_ ' ,r `• 11 art C]n Orr Off" On* ❑n Off OfF Serfas Club Dr Project Description The Project Approval and Environmental Document {PkED) for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project {CIP}, from SR-24110 Pierce Street, included the addition of a Sth lane in each direction, the addition of auxiliary lanes at various locations, the addition of collector -distributor (CD) lanes at the 1-151SR-91 interchange, the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Oranga Oounty line to 1-15, the construction of a SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from 1-15 South, a SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from 1-15 North (15191 Express Lanes Connector, the subject project), and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction from the 1-151SR-91 interchange southerly to 1-15ICaj91cu Road {nova part of ROTC 1-15 Express Lanes Project [EL PI), and easterly to east of McKinley Street, Due to economic conditions, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow an Initial Phase, with reduced improvements, to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed later. Subsequently, the proposed 15181 Express Lanes Connector improvements have been pulled out from the CIP as a standalone project, The I-15 Express Lanes to be extended from Ontario Avenue to iwajalco Road are included in RCTC's 1-15 Express Lane Project weth an anticipated completion date in 2020. 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN --- W__ I ' 0 on Orr 3-Lane OD Road from WIn St EB Ors -Ramp braid to join SR-91 as a merge ramp Key Considerations Oaordinatlan among many of the SR-91 freeway protects that overlap the project limits is cnticaI to successfully delNorthg these pralecls on schedule and within budget. Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme for each of these projects. Minimizing conflicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project team. Additionally, future projects frequently have multiple alternatives Under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specifically, the project improvements need to continue to be coordinated with the SR-711SR-91 interchange, the SR-241191 Express Connectur. and RCTC'S 1-15 Express Lanes Project. Benefits The 16191 Express Lanes Connector project wlII reduce congestion and operational delays by providing direct median -to -median access bot e'en the SR-91 Express Lanes and 1-15 Express Lan as. Traffic operations will improve by eliminating weaving conflicts and aut-of-direction travel along SR-91 and 1-15 by the use of the direct connectors. The project wiil provide molorists a choice to use Ifi c 15l91 Express Lanes Connector for a fee in exchange for timasavings. a"' off. to NB1SB 1-15 McKinley St Pierce St off 4n OFF aq On On Od 4.s Off Frnrry Pmrp SR Na 1-15 1-15 Express Lanes to 1-IRCajalca Rd (by RCT 1-15 Express Lames ProjecQ Current Status Preliminary engineering rs currently Under development and scheduled to be completed in 2018. The 15)91 Express Lanes Conductor is currently discussed in the environmental ducument for the SR-91 CIP that was completed In 2012. However, an anvironmevrrtal revalidation Is currently underway and scheduled to be completed in 20% Sohadale and Cost Anticipated protect completion is 202-2 and total cost is $stlmated to be $180,000,000. 13 310 F-71/SR- 1 Interchange Improvements Auto Can r Dr Green River Rd C.I. Coal County Qn ------Gypsum [qf CaFLY?n Line ors 61ap� al Canyon Rd Crossing Or (15 nr. OF f;n Off On Ofr flri 4M �' On OF Crum s' off 1a Green River Rd Maple SI Serfas club Dr LEGEND Existing Highway ® HOV LAna Erpsdng Lane I�ierchange+Ramp Tolled Express Lane proposed ImprOYamenl Lana Project Description 'rhe current project includes a new two-lane dlFect connector flyover from eastbound (EB) SR-91 to northbound {NB} SR-71 and madifica#ions to the existing Green River Road EB SP-91 on -ramp. Kays Consldsrations Project irnprovements must be coordinated with the following projects: the SR-91 Six[h General purpose and the SR-241151 Express Connector. Close coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and California Department of Fish and Wildlile will also be required as the connector crosses the Santa Ana River below the Prada Dam. Irl addition, implementation of Major Investment Study (MIS) Corridor A within the median of SR-91 will require the need for a three -level crossing of SR-91 and the proposed R-71 direct flyover connector. Benefits The project will provide a new direct connector improvement from EB SR-91 to NI3 5R-71, replacing the geometric choke point created by the existing connector. The project will also improve traffic operations and operational efficiency by eJiminating OT minimizing weaving conflicts through the use of auxiliary lanes. Current Status The environmental phase was completed in June 2011. Final design is underway. Schedule and Cost Construction is deferred to 2021-2023 pending Funding availability. Cost is estimated to be $123,40OX00_ 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 311 14 S! -9'1 Improvements East of 1-1 LEGEND Existing Highway rrrtercnanger�tem� ® HOV Large l Tolleo Express Lane tttttt� Existing Lane Proposed ImprovemerFt Lane 3-Lane CD Road from Main St EB On -Ramp braid to join SR-91 as a merge ramp Project Doscrlptlon Express Lanes to 1-151H1dden Malley Pk+ Express Lanes to t-1 SlCaja lc o Rd (by RCTC 1.15 Express Lanes Prujact) The Project Approval and Environmental Cocument (PAIED) for the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project (GIP), from SR-241 to Pierce Street, included lie addition of a 5th lane in each directior), the addition of auxiliary lanes at various locations, the addition of collector- istributor (CC) lanes at the 11AWSR-91 interchange. the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the Orange County line to 1-15, the construe cri of a SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from 1-15 South, a SIB-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from 1-15 North. and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction from the 1-151SR-91 interchange southerly to 1-15JGajalco Dead (now Karl of ROTC 1-15 Express Lanes Project [ELPJ}, and easterly to east of McK(nley Street, Due to economic conditians, a Project Phasing Plan was developed to allow an Initiai Phase, with reduced improvements, to move forward as scheduled. wilh the remaining uhCimate improvements to be completed later. The SR-91 improvements east of 1-15, which includes extending an Express Lane east of McKinley Street and adding a general purpose lane to Pierce Sheet 0 each direction (the subject project), is a component of the SR-91 CIP that was constructed with tltie Initial Phase, The 1-15 Express Lanes to he extended from Ontario Avenue to Cajalco Road are included in RCT 's I-15 Express Lanes Project with an anticipated completion date in 2020. The SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and tram 1-15 North is also a separate project. r O 1 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Key Considerations Coordination among many of the SR-91 freeway projects Thal overlAp the project limits is cxlucal to successfully deiivering these projects on schedule and within budget. Dadgninq to accammodate Future projects is a recufring theme for each of these projects. Minimizing cnntlicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project team. Additionally, future projects frequenliy have multiple altemalives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specifically, the project improvements need to cnrdlnue to be coordinated with the SR-711SR-91 interchange, the SR-241/01 Expmss Connector, 15191 Express Lames Connector, and RCTC's 1.15 Express Lanes Pr*ct. Benefits The SR-91 Improvements east of 1-15 will reduce congestion and delays by providing additional SR 91 capacity from 1-15 to Pierce Street. Current Status Preliminary engineering is complete but may need to be revisited at a future date. The SR-91 Improvements east of 1-15 is currently discussed in the SR-91 CIP environmental document for the SR-91 that was completed in 2012. Schedule and Cost Antlopated project completion and cost are to be determined. 15 312 BI-COUNTY PROJECTS Projects that benefit both Orange and Rverside Counties indude: Express Bus service improvements; Metrolink Service and Station Improvements; a &h General Purpose Lane Addition (SR 241 to SR 71); RCTC Operational Improvements; and a SR 241/ 91 Express Connector. These five (5) projects for implementation across the Orange-Rverside County Boundary are expected to cost in excess of $243 million (in 2018 dollars, or as noted). Express Bus Service Irrproverrents •. 5.825 Metrolink Service and Station Improvements 55 88 Sixth GP line Addition (SR 241 to SR 71) TBD ROTC Operational In provernents TBD SR 241/91 Express Caredor 181 SUBTOTAL 243+ 52 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 16 313 Express Bus Service Improvements _ To Rivwsldo Yoaea FULL TON LtNOA PLACENTIA - C:ornr� Femec�la Tmnsrt Center CORONA � {ANAHEIhx " QCTA Route 79+4 � Anaheim Resarl RTA RoUto 200 4'itlage at Orange RTA Route 205 RTA Route 216 Tn South Coastr4ktra Project Description Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), working with the Riverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC}, and the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), operate Express Bus service between Riverside and Orange counties, Commuters lack direct transit connections to some Orange County employment centers not served by Metrolink and these Express Bus service provide this connection_ Existing Service OCTA has operated Route 794 since 2006 from Riverside County to Hutton Centre and South Coast Metro (shown in orange above), RTA operated Route 216 since 2010 until January 2013 between the Village at Orange and Downlo n Riverside. New Service Two new Express Bus routes were implemented by RTA in January 2018 between Riverside County and Orange County including RTA Route 200 (shown in blue above) from San Bernardino/Riverside to the Anaheim Resort, The route provides hourly service on weekdays and 90.120 minute service weekends with a fleet of five buses, RTA Route 205 (shown in green above) from TemeculalCorona to the Village at Orange includes three AM and three PM roundthps by 3 buses. Existing RTA Route 216 (shown in dashed red above) from the Riverside Downtown Terminal to the Village at Orange was replaced by the new Routes 200 and 205. Since completion of the 91 Express Lanes, RTA more than doubled its Express Bus service on SR-91. Currently, OCTA operates 11 bus trips per day on SR-91_ RTA nnw operates 46 trips weekdays (up from 18 that Route 216 provided weekdays) and 18 trips weekends (up from 8 provided by Route 216) nn SR-91 Express Lanes. Service hours for this expansion is an extra 21,445 hours per year and is being served by five new RTA coaches added to the RTA fleet. �p4tFO 91 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Key Considerations Operating costs will average 54.825,000 each year and capital costs will average S825,000 per year. Intercounty Express Bus service is effective between locations where transit travel times by Express Bus would be more competitive than Metrolink and connecting rail feeder buses. There is some duplication of service between the existing Express Bus routes and Metrolink service_ One reason customers are attracted to Express Bus service over Metrolink is that the cost is approximately 33% lower- There may be some merit to sebsidiztng Metrolink fares for price -sensitive transit riders in this corridor instead of keeping competitive bus service. Benefits Express Bus services wall contribute to congestion relief on SR-91- Current Status The Express Bus Routes have been fully implemented as of EY18. Changes to routes may be made in the future based on available funding and ridership demand_ Schedule and Cost The Express Bus Routes have been fully implemented as of EY18, with future potential route changes. Operating casts will average $4,825.000 each year and capital costs will average $825,000 per year- 17 314 Metrolink Service and Station Improvements Z'y source_ . W-ff r Carrmrr StaSan Pro}ac! Defmftion Rsporr F, Miary 23. 2'J7 S Project Description The Anaheim Canyon Station improvement project includes the addition of a ser:ond track, platform, extensions of the existing platform, end associated passenger amenities, including ticket vending machines, benches, canopies and signage. This project will improve the safety and on -time performance of Metrolink service, as well as improved pedestrian circulation within the station. QCTA is the lead on all phases of projecl development, including envirenmental. The pfoposed Placentia Metrolink Station will be a new station on the 911Perris Valley line. OCTA is the lead for design and construction of the projects, Key Conside"tions Coordination has been ongoing with the Metrolink extension studies for the Anaheim Canyon and Placentia Station improvements_ 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Benefits Enabies development of expanded Metrolink service, improved efficiency, and fosters train ridership growth in the region which will Gonfribute to congestion relief on SR-91. Gurrent Status Preliminary plans for the Anaheim Canyon Station project were completed in early 2017. Environmental clearance was completed in June 2017_ Final plans, specifications and estimates are expected to be completed in May 2019_ Construction for the Anaheim Canyon Station improvements should begin late 2019_ plans for the new Placentia Slation platforms, station amenities, and parking strucWre are complete. Construction Will begin pending negotiations with ONSF Railway. Schedule and Cost Construction is anticipated to begin in We 2019 for the Anaheim Canyon Station improvements. Construction for the Placentia Station will begin pending ne otiaiions with 6N5F Railway. The project cost is estimated to be $55,800,000_ 18 315 -1 Sixth General Purpose Lane Addition 0,n Lxisting bike path will ba preserr+ed Gypatim CAnyoo Rd Off Lanes shn are for The S R-2 41191 Express Lanes Connector T U^ Project widens all SR-91 lanes to standard lanr# and shoulder widths From SR-241 to 8R--F1 Coal Canyon Ccufrtp Line Green River Rd } CF053ir}0 1 ■ I "n rh aR at, on On Lanes shown are for the SR- 711SR-91 Intercnarhg0 east to north flyovef connector for 8R-71 , and ppnnw-tor from Green Rtvar Road to EB 5R-3f T Gh HU Laren shown is for Green fiver Road EB SR-91 On -Ramp LEGEND Existing Highway ® 11()V Larle Exir.Lipq Lane fntetdlangeoRamP PpIled Expn98san Le Pi-op4sed tmprovemanl I -aria Project Description T+ v Project Approval and Environmental Document (PAJED) fof the SR-91 Cotr!dor Improvement P"ect (CIP), from SIR-241 to Pierce Street. inciuded the addition of a 5th lane in each direction, the addition of auxiliary Ian" at various locations. the addition of collector -distributor {CD) lanes at the 1-15iSR-91 interchange, the ex*nsion of " 91 Express Lanes froin the Orange County line to I-15, ttte construction of a SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from 1-15 Soutl>. a SR-91 Express Lanes median direct connector to and from I-15 North, and the construction of one Express Mahe in each direction from the 1-161SR-91 interchange soulherly to I-WCajolco Rcad (now part of RCTC I-15 Express Lanes Project (ELPI). and easterly to east of McKlriley Street, We #o economic conditions, a Project Phasing Man was developed to allow an Initial Phase, with reduced improvements, to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ul#imate improvements to be completed later_ The SR-91 sixth gerieriai purpose lane in each directian between SIR-241 and SR-71 (the subject of this project) is a component of the R-91 CIP that was not constructed with the Initial Phase, The 1-15 Express Danes to be extended from On#afio Avenue to Cajalco Road are indtided in RMs I-15 Express Lanes Projec# wi#h an anticipated completien date in 202G. The R-91 Pxpress banes median direct connector to and from I-15 North is also a separate protect. �y,UiFO 91 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Ivey Considerations Coordination almorlg many of the SR-91 freeway projects Ihait overlap the project lirmts is crr4i;al to successfully deliveNng these projects on schedule and within butlget. Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme for anch of these projects. Minimizing conflicts in scope between projects requires direct coordination between each project team. Additionally, future projects frequently have mulliple aliomatives under study, each with differing scope and construction footprints. Specifically, the projl#ct improvements need to continue to be coordinated with the Sid-711SR-91 interchange, tha SR-241191 Express Connecter, 15191 Express Lanes Connector, and RCT's 1-15 Express Lames Project. Benefits The SR-91 Sixth General Purpose Lane Addition will reduce congestion and delays by providing additional SR-91 capacity from SR-241 to SR-71, current status Pfeliminary engineering is complete but may need to be revisited at a future date. The SR 91 Sixth General Purpose Lane Addition is currently discussed irl the SR-91 CIP envirorimentat documem for the SR-9i that was completed irF 2012, Schedule and Cost Anticipated prajact completion and cost are to he determined. 19 316 RCTC Operational Improvements LEGEND Existing Highvmy � Interchar�gelRamP ® MOV Lane Tolled Express Lane i Existing Lane Proposed Improvemeni Lane Gp�,tFOR.y�� 91 Express Lanes W HSfHldden Valley Pkwy Auto Ci�►1ICr Dr MapIE 51 Lim olrk A Main St Cournty Lena Green River Rd D1, ol+ c'., cy. On an 0 ill y On on McKinley St On Oil 4I. Pierce St Off On ,OW 11 — = 15 i On On CRY C]n Oft On r,, CXf or On- On cif Of From From Dft S I N11 on arr - h15 J•15 10 Serf as Club Or N918B 1• t5 Project Description A range of i:arridor improvenents are being developed to potentially Improve traffic operations for the general purpose lanes- The location of these additlanal operational improvemenls iriclude. a) R-91 westbound at the County Line, and b) 1-15 northbound at the ROTC 01 Express Laries entrance- The nature of these operational improvements range from re-stripang express lane ingresslagross areas to the construction of an additional auxiliary lane between interchanges. 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Key Considerations Factors considered to advance corridor improvements include expected improvement to general purpose lane congestion, impact to the express lane operations, impact to toll revenue- consistency with 51 Express Lanes toll policy, project implementation cost and schedule, environmental approvals, available funding, necessary approvals by other agencies, and other factors. Benefits Potential benefits may include travel time savings and reduced traffic queues for general purpose lane users. Potential benefits may also include congestion reduction and improved mobility for the overall corridor when accounting for both general purpose lane and express lane users. These potential improvements may benefit certain traffic movements, localized corridor areas, andlar the entire corrider- 20 EWess Lanes to 0 SIC ajalco Rd (by FACT I-16 Express Lanes Projee) Current Status Conceptual improvement options have been created and are now being developed- Ongoing analysis and work continues in the following areas; traffic operations, toll revenue impacts, cost estimating. project scheduling, and overall project implementatiorf- Schedule and Cost Anticipated full project romplation and costs are to be determined. 317 R- 41191 Express Connector - - - GDaI Gaaon I ir... f'wiinh� � LEGEND exiol+rkg Hgrwuay Inlerchanq?dRamp ® HOV Lane Tilled EXPTems Lane EXIyJL g Ldne PrDpDsL-4 rrnwcivemert L9nr- Project Description The SR-241 G1 Express Connector will carry northbound {NB) SR-241 traffic to eastbound (E9) 91 Express Lanes and carry wasthound {WB} 91 Express Lanes traffic to southbound TSB} SR-241. Outside widening would be required on the south side of SR-91 for realignment of EB lanes up to the Coal Canyon Crossing. Key Considerations This project was originally planned as a Nigh Occupancy Vehicle (HOV} connector into the SR-91 HOV lane, With the implementation of the 91 Express Lanes, the project: will need to ca refulty coordinate the tratric operations and totling paircies lb al will result with the convergence of the SR-241 Toll Road, the OCTA 91 Express Lanes, and the RCTC 91 Express Lanes Continuous aperadons of the 91 Express Lanes will be a key consideration far this project. The preliminary analysis calls for the SR-91 to be widened to the south to make room for a two lane (one in each direction) direct connector and associated Express Auxiliary Lanes in each direction. The project would tie into the SR-91 CIP improvements at Goal Canyon, Coordination will be conducted with local agencies to ensure the project avoids impacts to planned bicycle and trail connections on Gypsum Canyon Road per City of Anaheim General Plarl and OCTA Commuter Sikaways Strategic Plan. 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Benefits The laroject will provide con nectivity from the 91 Express Lanes and the SR-241 Tolk Road. The project improves access to SR-241 and South County for traffic that does not currently utilize the 91 Express Lanes. which also improves WB SR-91 by eliminating the need for NO►1 and Express Lane users to weave across four general purpose lanes to use the existing SB SR-241 connector. It will help alleviate congestion through the conridor by aiioWng SR-241 users to directly access the 91 Express Lanes and thereby removing vehicles from the SIR-91 general purpose lanes. Current Status Preliminary engineering concepts for a SR-241191 Express Lanes direct -connector have been developed by The FoothitllEastem Transportation Corridor Agency (TCA) and Caltrans. The 91 Express Lanes Extension and SR-241 Connector Feasibility Study was completed in March 2009 and was initiated to evaluate the various altemabve& A Protect Study Report was initiated in January 2011 and was completed by January 2012. The Draft Project Report and Draft Environmental Document were completed in latez- 2016, and the Final Project Report and Environmental Document is anticipated to be completed in 2018. Final Engineering has been deferred until the Envira(imerltal Document is certified and is anticipated to be completed in 2019. TCA will continue to work with all affected agencies involved to Ond a solution that results 0) the completion of this project and minimizes the impacts to traffic flows_ Schedule and Cost Anholpated {project construction to be completed in 2023 arid cost is estimated to be $181,0t70.000_ 21 318 SECTION 3: APPENDIX A - POST-203 5 AND CONCEPTUAL PROJECTS Concepts for potential Post-2035 implementation (potentially earlier if funding becomes available) focus on longer -lead time projects. This multi -billion dollar program may include: an elevated 4-lane facility (MIS Corridor A) from SR 241 to 1-15; the Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Pail; the Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-lane facility from SR 241/SR 133 to 1-15/Cajalco Road (formerly known as MIS Corridor B), VWB SR 91 to SIB SR 55 Connector Improvements, and EB SR 91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR 241 These potential concepts include significant environmental constraints and right of way requirements in addition to requiring a significant amount of planning, design, and future policy and public input. The MIS Corridor Aconcept may incorporate projects being developed in the earlier programs as concept components. Elevated 4-Lane Facility (MS Corridor A) from SR 241 to 1-15 2,720 Anaheimto Ontario Intematiorial Airport Maglev Figh Speed Rail 2,77Q3,200 Irvine -Corona Expreswisy (ICE) 4-1-ane Facility from SR 241/SR 133 to 1-151C doo Road 8,855 Vb6 SR 91 to SB SR 55 Connector Inprovements 75-150 EB SR 91 Fifth Lane Addition at SR 241 31 SUBTOTAL 14,451-14,956 `N�iFO 41 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 22 319 Elevated 4-Lane Facility MIS Corridor A) from R- 41 to If15 �� ■sw �� Eiavated 4-t_ane Facility (MIS CarridofA) Gross -Section CDncept Description The improvements primarily consist of con%trucling a new 4-lane elevated expressway near orwtftri ti-1a Santa Ana Canyon with freeway -to -freeway connectors at SR-241 arrd 1-15. The facility may include manapaf lanes and potential reversible operations. Key Con eldefations C40ice of alignment will be" to determining net capacily increase- Extensive right-flf-way (RIVV) will be required to implement the improvements if the alignment is Trot in the SR-91 carridor. When median connector projects or HOVIHOT projects are constructed and this 4-lane elevated facility is proposed within the median of SR-91 through Corona, then extensive managed lane clr curet} wo►IId he required during construction (thus temporarily reducing SR-91 opacity during construction}. An alternative could be studied for the rnedien Corridor A viaduct along with reduced SR-91 geornatrit, standards to minimize R/VV impacts. Also, direct conneclors (such as for High Occupancy Vohicle (HOV} I High Occupancy Toll (H01} at 1-15ISR-91) tolfrom the median could be precluded by Maglev columns loc.aited within the same median area. Caltrans and Maglev highway WK maintenance, safety, and operations aonsjderations would need to be analy2ed if shared use with a Maglev facility were pursued_ Add itronaL mitigation costs may be required for improvements to SR-241 pind 5R-133 as a result of adddfanaI Corridor traffic volumes. CorridorA as managed lanes, with the extension of 91 Express Lanes to 1-16, this project concept may affect traffic disthbutlon dua to "parallel' tailed fadllities, Benefits The concept would provide Mgn1ricant congestion relief by a[lowing vehicles to bypass the at -grade freeway lanes and local arterial interchanges between SR-241 and 1-15_ Connactlorrs are proposed directly betweein SIR- 91, SR-24t, and 1-15. curmlit Status This �,ont�ept is identified in the Rlverside Counly - Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) as part of the Locally Preferred Strategy to imprave mobility between Riverside County and Orange County. No project development word is planned at this time. Schedule and Cos# Antirzfpated project cnmplaban is post-21335 arid construction cost is estimated to toe $2.720,000.000 (2005 dollars}. r . 2018 SR-91 Implementation Plan 320 23 Anaheim to Ontario International Airport Maglev High Speed Rail TO o,R . OnIMH. 1144 A�Iymrr+rF Pr.p—d A.�uim 4. D.,, HER ARVum.ir! r f —W 1 A LEGEND REPRESENTA TOVE ALIGNMENT St-X)WN FOR +LLUSTPA riVE Pt1RPOSES ONLY Easairig Highway High Speea Rail Represerlfativt' A]igrirnent Concept Description Deneflts Proposals for a new super speed train corridor from Anaheim to Ontario are included in this concept. This concept includes an alternative that would use SR-91 rlg0l-of-way, or would be aligned adjacent to SR-91 right-of-way, or could potentially be cc -located with the Major Investment Study (MIS) Corridor A alignment. Another alignment opportunity is being investigated along 8R-57, Key Consideratlons Alternative alignment impacts to 8R-91 right-of-way envelope andlor Santa Ana River are undetermined. The choice of afignmerit will potentially impact MIS Corridor A. Righl-of-way (RIW) will be required to implement the improvements, Potential cotisideradons for co -locating the Magnetic Levitation (Maglev) train adjacent to Corridor A (and also SR-91) include providing a two -column structure with a barrier between the trains and aehicfes. CaRrans and Maglev highway RfW, maintenance, safety, and operations considerations woulcf need to be analyzed if shared use with a Ma9tev facility were pursued, See the MIS Corridor A project for additional considerations, Coordination With Metrolink improvements will he required. The concept would provide congestion relief by providing a direct high-speedMigh-capacity connection wflh Ontario International Airport for Orange County air passengers and business next -day deliveries. MagIev will make the trip in just 14,5 minutes. Relieves congestion on SR-91 by providing additional capacity in the corridor, Current Statua Preliminary desrgnr engineering and Phases 'I and 2 of a Preliminary Environmental impact StatementlEnvironnnental Impact Statement (PPISiEIS) are completed. Congress has approved $45M in SAFETEA-LU for the envrfcnmental phase of the project, The Anaheim to Ontario segment is included in the "Constrained" Plait of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) regional Transportation Plan (RTP) passed in April 2012, Construction funding of up to 7 billion has beers identified through a loan commitment from the China Export -Import Bank_ Schedule and Cost Anticipated project completion i5 2035 And construction cost is estimated to be from $2.770,000,000 to $3,200.000,000 (2012 dollars). GP4lFORJy�� 91 2018 SR-91 Implementation Plan 321 24 Irvine -Corona Expressway (ICE) 4-Lane Facility from R- 41I R-'I to 1-15J ajallco Load 13 ICE fCORRIDOR B) N. LEGEND = Existing Highway ICE {Corridor B) Representative Alignmem Concept DescrlptlQn The improvements primarily consist of constructing a highway and rail facility through the Cleveland National Forest with freeway -to -freeway connectors at 5R-2411SR-133 and I-1bUCajalco Road, The facility would essentially be a continuation of SR-133 on the west end of the corridor, to 1-16 on the east end. Key C ons I de rations The tunnel concept is technically feasible based on the geotechnical investigation completed in December 2009. The initial project phase would be the construction of one 2-lane highway tunnel and one rail tunnel. The second project phase would include construction of a secant! 2-lane highway tunnel_ Additional technical studies and geotechnice l borings would be needed to refine the tunnel alignments and grades- Costs associated with the Irvine -Corona rzxpressway (ICEj tunnels are based on the Feasibility Evaluation Report corn plere d in December 2009_ A financial analysis will be needed for the construction, operations and toll requirements of the ICE tunnels- Benefits CA,IALCO RD a- REPRESENTA P VE ALIGNMENTSHMN FOR iLLUSTRADVE PURPOSES ONLY The concept would pravlde significant Congestion reliaf by providing an alternative route between Orange and Riverside counties and would allow vehicles to bypass SR-91 between SR-241 and 1-15. The concept would not disrupt SR-91 traffic during construction and would allow For additional route selection for incident management, emergency evacuation, and For continuity of the highway network by linking SR-133 to 1-15- Current Status On August 27, 2010 the Riverside Orange Corridor Authority Board took action to defer additional study of the ICE concept until Such time as financial considerations improve and/or technological advancements warrant reexamination. Review of the concept shell be done annually through the SR-91 Implementation Plarl update to deterrnioa if any of the major assumptions with regard to financial considerations, private sector interest, or technological advancements have changed to make the tunnel financially viable. (See "ICE status summary" for Further discussion). Schedule and Cost Anticipated project completion is post-2085 and construction cost is estimated to be 8,855,000,000 (2009 dollars). 52 2018 SR-91 Implementation Plan 322 25 WI3 Sid- 1 to SI3 SR - a Connecter Improvement Concept Description The project consists of operatlorxal Improvements py modifying tha connector to S6 3R-55 from WB SR-91. The improvements would extend to Lakeview Avenue to the east and would include a rtew connector from W13 SR-91 tv SB SR-55 as a potential right-hand exit. Key Considerations Flight -of -way impacts, detailed SR-551SR-911 interchange improvements, and downstream impacts to SR-55 require further evaluation in a subsequent phase of project development. Conceptual design of SR-551SR-91 would be coordinated with completed improvements at SR-91 and 7ustin Avenue, and with the SR-91 Environmental Study .Improvements from SR-57 to SR-55. The study for Project#6 is currently being conducted which includes the SR-551SR-91 interchange area, however, that project's objective is to primarily improve operations of the SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-57 Operational enhancements between R-55 and Lakeview Avenue may provide Borne benefil for 51R-55iSR-91 by addressing WB SR-91 weaving issues. Benefits Interchange improvernogls. are anticipated to provide congestion relief for WB SR-91 traffic and potentially improve the connection from VVB SR-91 to SB SR-55. Current Status SR-551SR-91 project information was derived from tho Final Alternatives Evaluation and Refinement Report, December 2005, by the Riverside County - Orange County Mejor Investment Study {MISS. Focused SR-91ISR-55 conceptual engineering needs to be scheduled_ However. initial conceptual engineering was also studied as part of the SR-91 Feasibility Study Between State Route 57 and State Route 55 Interchange Areas in June 2009. Schedule and Cost Anticipated project comptetion Is post-2035 and construction cost rs estimated to be from $75,000.000 to $150,000.000. GP4lFORJy�� 91 2018 SR-91 Implementation Plan 323 26 EB R- 1 Fifth Lane Addition at SR-241 Weir S; LEGEND � Exlstop HPR*aY : I F1 I IS F C h Elrl4elFianip Concept Des criptlon The location of the proposed ES SR-91 fifth general purpose (GP) lane addition (The Segment) is on EB SR-91 from Weir Canyon Road to the NB SR-241 Connector. The Segment consists of 4 (four) GP lanes and 2 (two) managed lanes (91 Express Lanes), Upstream (westerly) from The Segment the EB 3R-91 has 5 GP lanes and the 51h lane drops to the SS SR-241 Connector as some traffic volume exits to the SB SR-241. Downstream from The Segment the EB SR-91 gains the 5th lane back es the NB SR-241 Connector merges with SR-91 in a dedicated lane addition. This 5th lane continues beyond the Riverside Courtly litre providing enhanced mobility, Key Considerations This -segment with 4 GP lanes might be cfeating a traFfio choke point due to the decrease of capaclly, potentially contributing to 3ignificarit traffic delays passing through this segment along with other traffic issues such as queue lumping, weaving, merging ante opera[lonal speed differential. However, additional traffic from NB SR-241 to EB SR-91 and Gypsum Canyon Rd on-rarnp suggest balancing the number of lanes should be carefully examined. As such. addillonal rapacity will enhance ES freeway operalions along this Segment, ® HDW Lanff Ealsting Lane jblled Expri3ss 1-arw. Prepaiied lmprUVamEpL Lan= Benefits 1. Extends the existing 5th EB BP lane easterly and ties it to the existing 5th lane downstream, This could provide capacity erihancement and may result in rernovin€g ati existing tfioke point. Significatit deist' savings is anticipated. 2. Potentially eliminate queue jumping in this area from ES SR-91 as well as Weir Canyon Fed_ 3. Potentially reduce speed differential between through lanes, thus Creating a more balanced flow. 4_ Potentially provide valanced large utiliza4an at Mgt) traffic dernand area_ Current Status Additional traffic analysis and study is required to confirm the benefits to EB SR-91 by the proposed improvernents. This location was identified by Galtrans as a high congestion location in the County_ The concept is intended to improve the choke point that exisfs due to the presence of a 4 lane segment between 5 lane freeway segments. The project cost is proposed to be funded by SE-9 P"ram with a target RTL of 2025_ Schedule and Cost The project cost is proposed to be funded by S8-1 Program funds with an anticipated Ready to List (RTL) date of 2026 and construction estimated as 2027. The total project cost is estimated to be $31.250,000. �p4lFORJy�� 91 2018 SR-91 Implementation Plan 324 27 SECTION4: APPENDIX B - COMPLETED PROJECT EXHIBITS The following exhibits represent completed projects from previous Plans since 2006, and are intended to be used as a reference to illustrate the progress made since the inception of the Plan. Note: some projects listed in the Plan as oornpleted (see Section 1, Project Accomplishments) are not induded herein since there was no exhibit created or necessary for use with prior Plans (such as for restriping projects, various safety enhancements, minor operational improvements, etc.). 77B-1Green Ewer Fbad Overcrossing F�eplaoerrent 71VVbrdi2009 North Main Street corona Metrolink Station Parking SbWuure 009 B-3 Eastbound Lane Addition from SR 241 to SR 71 September 2010 B4 VVIden SR 91 betv�een SR 55 and SR 241 by Adding a gh GP Lane in Each Direction Decernber 2012 B-5 SR 91 wt3 Lane at Tustin Avenue Apri 12016 B-6 Metrolink Service Irrprovernts June 2016 B-7 Initial Phase GP: VUden SR 91 by One GP Lane in Each Direction East of Green Rver Rd, CD Roads July 2017 and 1-15/SR 91 Direct South Connector, Extension of Express Lanes to 1-15 and SysternILocal Interchange Improvements `NQiFOHry,q 7� 2018 SR-91 Implementation Plan 325 Green River Road avercrossing Replacement Appendix Project No: B-1 Actual Completion: March 2009 Project Costs Capital Cost $ 21,D00,000 Support Cost $ 3,000,000 R1W Cost $301,000 Total Project Cost $ 24,301,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Completed Environmental Completed Design Completed Construction Completed Project Schedule Caltrans Equivalents Preliminary Engineering = PID Environmental = PAIED Design = PS&E Abbreviations: CD = Collector Distributor Lane FTR = Future HOV = High Occupancy Vehicle SHLD = Shoulder 77, 1381 Project Description Improvements primarily consist of replacing the existing Green River Road overcrossing with a new six -lane wide, 4-span overcrossing to accommodate future widening of SR-91. The interior spans will accommodate up to eight mainline lanes in each direction including two HOV lanes. The exterior spans can accommodate two lanes, either for auxiliary lanes or collector distributor roads. Entrance and exit ramps will be realigned and widened to accommodate the new bridge, yet the interchange will retain its current configuration. New signals will be installed at the ramp intersections. Ramp and bridge improvements will be constructed within existing right of way. Key Considerations Design interface is required with the Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71, SR-711SR-91 Interchange Improvements, SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project, and SR-2411SR-91 HOWHOT Connector. Benefits The project will improve the level of service at ramp and local street intersections at the interchange. Improvements will reduce ramp queues that extend into the freeway's general purpose lanes, thus contributing to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status The project began construction in March 2007 and was completed in March 2009. 13A, 79 W13 Lb GREEN RIVER BRIDGE CROSS-SECTION NOTE: All dimensions are approximate Gp�,tFOR.y�� 91 2018 SR-91 Implementation Plan 326 29 North Main Street Corona Metrolink Station Parking Structure Appendix Project No: B-2 Actual Completion: June 2009 Project Costs Capital Cost $ 20,000,000 Support Cost $ 5,000,000 RIW Cost $0 Total Project Cost $ 25,000,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Completed Environmental Completed Design Completed Construction Completed Project Description The project provides a six level parking structure with 1,065 parking stalls. The construction is within the existing North Main Street Metrolink station property in Corona. Key Considerations Proposed improvements were constructed within existing right of way. Currently there are 700 users of the facility, 200 more that were previously able to accomodate. Additionally RCTC has opened up the lot to park and ride carpools and vanpools and has issued over 120 permits for carpoolers to use the expanded station. This shows an added benefit of supporting carpooling as well as transit to offset congestion on SR-91. Benefits Demand for parking currently exceeds the capacity at the North Main Street Corona station. New parking capacity will allow Metrolink ridership to increase thereby diverting vehicle trips from SR-91. Current Status Construction was initiated in January 2008 and was completed in June 2009_ The project was funded with Federal Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds. 'f�BALINDA CV11JdHILLS � NQRCG PLACENTIA � - L �--IRONA — AIVAf AIM Metrol�nk Parking structur� VILLA \ �_ ANGE PARK \ rt Ps of t is map co yrighted by Thomas Bros Maps an produced with permission. is2018 SR-91 Implementation Plan 327 30 Eastbound Lane Addition from SR-241 to SR-71 Appendix Project No: B-3 Actual Completion: September 2010 Project Cost Estimate Capital Cost $ 41,000,000 Support Cost $ 8,000,000 R1W Cost $ 2,200,000 Total Project Cost $ 51,200,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Completed Environmental Completed Design Completed Construction Completed LEGEND Existing Highway Interchange/Ramp County Line M HOV or HOT Lane _ -i Existing Lane .wi Project Improvement Lane � Existing Interchange Project Description The project will provide an additional eastbound (ES) lane from the SR-911SR-241 interchange to the SR-711SR-91 interchange and will widen all EB lanes and shoulders to standard widths. Key Considerations Coordination with the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Projects (Project #3 and #11) will be required. Staged construction would be required for all ramp reconstruction and freeway widening. Freeway operations would most likely be affected by this project, however, freeway lane closures are not anticipated. An EB concrete shoulder will be constructed with a 12 foot width to provide for future widening as contemplated by Project #3 and #11. Benefits The lane addition would help to alleviate the weaving condition between SR-241 and SR-71, as well as remove vehicles from the SR-91 mainline that would be exiting at Green River Road and SR-71. Current Status Funding is from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) with $71.44M approved, and the balance of project costs are from other sources. Construction began in late 2009 and was completed in September 2010. Coal Canyon On�m Canyon Rd off WLC On Oft - 1 -A-------L- - ------ ---------------- ----------- ------------------------- � 1 I I___________- I------------ Vfl ' db---On County Line Green River ffRd �. Off F- OF] Gp�,tFOR.y�� 91 2018 SR-91 Implementation Plan 328 31 Appendix Project No: B-4 Actual Completion: January 2013 Project Costs Capital Cost $ 65,005,000 Support Cost $ 19,639,000 R/W Cost $ 573,000 Total Project Cost $ 85,217,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Completed Environmental Completed Design Completed Construction Completed LEGEND Existing Highway InterchangelRamp Existing Interchange - i HOV or HOT Lane - i Existing Lane Project Improvement Lane Auxiliary Lane Off I LakeviewDffAv I I I Widen SR-91 between SR-55 and SR-241 by Adding a 5th GP Lane in Each Direction Project Description This project proposes capacity and operational improvements by adding one general purpose (GP) lane on eastbound (EB) SR-91 from the SR-55/ SR-91 connector to east of the Weir Canyon Road interchange and on westbound (WB) SR-91 from just east of Weir Canyon Road interchange to the Imperial Highway (SR-90) interchange. Additionally, this project would facilitate truck traffic approaching the truck scales in both directions. Key Considerations Caltrans is not considering relocation of the truck scales at this time. Benefits Alleviates congestion on WB SR-91 by eliminating the lane drop at the truck scales and providing a continuous GP lane to SR-90. Alleviates congestion on EI3 SR-91 by eliminating the lane drop for northbound (NB) SR-55 at SR-91 by providing an auxiliary lane to Lakeview Avenue, and at SR-90 by providing a continuous GP lane through Weir Canyon Construction was completed in January 2013. The project received $22M of Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) funding and $74M of State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Augmentation funds. Truck Scales Weir Canyon Rd On Off On Off On Off 40 ypsum on Canyon Rd Or Off 1 On Off 1 Off 1 1 1 -------------- Off NOTE: FAIRMONT BLVD IS CONTINGENT UPON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT �pIaFORMl� 91 2018 SR-91 Implementation Plan 329 32 Appendix Project No: B-5 Actual Completion: April 2016 Project Cost Estimate* Capital Cost $ 22,218,000 Support Cost $ 16,382,000 RIW Cost $ 4.682,000 Total Project Cost $ 43,282,000 Project Schedule Preliminary Engineering Completed Environmental Completed Design Completed Construction Completed LEGEND � Existing Highway - InterchangelRamp County Line p HOV Lane ATolled Express Lane SIC Existing Lane Proposed Improvement Lane SR-91 WB Lane at Tustin Avenue Project description The project will add a westbound (WB) auxiliary lane on SR-91 beginning at the northbound (NB) SR-55 to WB SR-91 connector through the Tustin Avenue interchange. This project includes approximately 1.1 lane miles. Key Considerations Build Alternative 3 was selected from the Project Study Report (PSR), On Westbound (WB) SR-91 Auxiliary Lane from the Northbound (NB) SR-551WB SR-91 Connector to the Tustin Avenue Interchange, and requires additional right-of-way. City of Anaheim utilities are within close proximity of the proposed widening section. Widening of the Santa Ana River bridge is required. Coordination with the City of Anaheim occurred for widening of Tustin Avenue and the WB SR-91 Off -Ramp that was completed in early 2011. Benefits The project would reduce or eliminate operational problems and deficiencies on this section of WB SR-91 including weaving and merging maneuvers. This project would also address choke -point conditions, which are caused primarily by extensive weaving between the NB SR-55 to WB SR-91 connector and the WB SR-91 off -ramp to Tustin Avenue. Current Status Preliminary engineering was completed and approved by Caitrans. The environmental phase was completed in November 2010, and design was completed in mid-2013. Construction was initiated in February 2014. The project received $14M from the Proposition 1B State -Local Partnership Program (SLPP), $14M from Measure M, with the balance from Regional Improvement Program (RIP) funds. Contract acceptance and open to traffic in May 2016. T, mfin ❑w Lakeview Av Gp�,tFOR.y,� 91 2018 SR-91 Implementation Plan 330 33 Appendix Project No: B-B Actual Completion: 2016 Project Cost Estimate* IEOC Sarvice Cost $ 1.160.000 Perris Walley Line Cast S 248.000.000 Total Metrolink Costs $ 249,160,000 Project Schedule Complete 2016 * Costs from OCTA end ROTC (in 2015 dollars) Metrolink Service Improvements Project Description There are sixteen daily trains that run on We IECC Line and nine trains running on the Los Angeles to Riverside pat1ion of 91JPerris lraliey (91 iFV) Line for a total of 25 daily trains. The long-term service improvements will include 24 IEOC trains by 2030. The Perris Valley portion of the 91 Line extends Metrolink service southeast by 25 miles, from Riverside to Perris. The project is located within the right of way of the existing San Jacinto Branch tine through Riverside, Moreno Walley and Perris. Construction began in October 2013, cost approximately $248 million, and the extension opened to the public in June 2016. The inaugural schedule (December 2015) includes nine trains through to Las Angeles and 12 between Ferris and Riverside. Key Considerations Construction of the new Placentia Metrolink station will improve passenger access to the 9VPV Line, by creating a station between Fullerton and Corona- Improvements at the Anaheim Canyon station are designed to account for fulure expansion of the IFOG rail service- 113eneirts Enables development of expanded Metrolink service, improved efficiency, and fosters train ridership growth in the region, which will contribute to congestion relief on SR-91. Current Status Two additional IEOC Line roundfrips were added in late 2015, and in mid-2016, nine trains began service on the Perris Valley extension to the 91IPV Line. f} DAiLY TR4WS CHINO ` f�rlstrrrg: 2b HILL& 2916: 2� YORRA FULL 1'011 LIN13A P"CEIPMA 10. Z F--� via Fiteran AHEI6i1 ONLY THAWS 2016: 18 HdRCO r . cal OMA Perris Valley Line R*ER51�! ` +wnn1n+ �1 JERMS wr�rt� nwFF ixia� f Gp�,tFOR.y�� 91 2018 SR-91 Implementation Plan 331 34 Initial Phase GIP: Widen SR-91 by One GP lane In Each Direction East of Green River Road, C D Roads and 1-151 R- 1 Direct South Connector, Extension of Express Lanes to 1-15 and System I Local Interchange Improvements Project No. B-T Actual Completion: 2017 Project Cost Estimate• Total Capilal Cost S 1,161,000.000 Support Cast $ 246.000.000 Total Project Cost $ 1,407:000,000 Project Schedule' Preliminary Engineering Completed Environmental completed DesigrllConstruclion 2013-2017 Cost obtained For Iridial Phase is from ROTC (2014 dullars) " Schedule for Inital Phase. subsequent phase For Ultimate Project anlicipBted in 2035 On LEGEND Existing Highway � inkerctrarxxeFfiarnp County Line ■ no ■ Coal Q_mrtyw) CFo55ing HOV Lane foiled Express LAne tAu&ig Lune Pmposod Improvement Lam CD Raaa Awmiliary t-ane * BFsided CCCn0Ct41r fi f Gypsum Canyon Rd 6n Gff r,q uld On Project Oascf-iptlon The approved Project Study Report (PSR) for the SR-91 Corridor improvement Project (CIP)- from SR-241 to Pierce Street, includes the addition of a 5th general purpose lane in each direction, the addition of auxiliary lanes at various locations, additional lanes at Elie SR-711SR-91 interchange (Projec( #5), and collectof -distributor (CD) lanes at the 1-15fSR-91 interchange. Subsequently, the Riverside County Transportation Cornrnission's (RCTC) 1 Year Delivery Plan recommended the following in addition to the PSR recommended improvements: the extension of the 91 Express Lanes from the +Grange County iine to 1-15, Elie construction of SR-91 (F-SWBjli-15 (SBIN R) Express Lanes median direct connectors, and the construction of one Express Lane in each direction from the V151SR-91 interchange southerly to I-1SIC ajalco Poad, and northerly to 1-1511-11idden Valley Parkway- An Express Lanes ingresslegress Ian& is also planned near the County Line. Due to econornlc conditions- a Project Phasing Flan was developed to allow an initial Phase with reduced improvements to move forward as scheduled, with the remaining ultimate improvements to be completed later- The following is a surnmafy of the deterred ultimate improvements: V151SR-91 median Narth Direct Connector. and 1-15 Express Lanes North to Glidden Valley Parkway (Project #9); general purpose Ian es and Express Lanes from V15 to Pierce Street. and general purpose lanes from SR-241 to R-71. The 1-15 Express Lanes to be extended from Ontario Avenue to Cajalco Road are included in RCTC's I-15 Express Lane Project with an anticipated completion in 2420. Key Considerations oordinatiar5 among many of the SR-91 freeway projects that overlap the praject limits is orltleall to successfully delivering these projects or) schedule and within budget. Designing to accommodate future projects is a recurring theme far each of these projects. Minimizing conflicts iR scope between projects requires direct rdinaiiork between each project team. AddltFanslty, futurQ projects frequently have m0liple allerri0ves under study, fawf h with differing scope ana construction footprints. Spedfieally, the project improvements need to corttirMue to be coordiDMed with the SR-711SR-91 interc�hainge, the SR-241191 Express Connecter, and RCTC's 1-15 Express Large Rrnji eta Benefits The Initial Phase and Ultimate CIP projects will reduce congestion and delays by providing additional SR-91 capacity from R-241 to Pierce Street, along 1-15 from SIB-91 to Cajalco Road to the south, and to Hidden Valley Parkway to the north. Traffic operations will improve by eliminating or reducing Weaving conflicts along SR-91 and 1-15 by the use of CD roads and auxiliary lanes. The project will provide motorists a choice to use Express Lanes for a fee in exchrange for time savings - Current Status The environmental phase was completed in Fall 2412. A Deskgn-Build contractor was selected in May 2013 and construction activities began in early 2014 forth$ lnktiat Phase. The project is anticpated to open to traffic In Spring 2417 with final project acceptance anticipated at the end of 2017. Off Coal Canyon Crossing IngresslEgress lanes Shown within the Express Lanes by restripkng County Line Green River Rd On AN �K 6n wr ❑f1 i I T I .-JI Auto Center Dr Maple St Lincoln At+ On Maln St Fr°'r' NB °r Fforn Tuh- St kokbotart CQnldFr I p On 1 ♦ 1 OffI-1rs C1QnMd01£ 1 BB I 01i 0 �!P 01" 1 On Olf Oh Off 10 from Ila Mapie SI Sodas Ma,n t I C:ah Dr st 1-155 Serfas Club Dr 3-Lane CD Road Connector from Main St EB on -ramp braid tojoin SR-91 as a merge ramp On' OW Fran Froiri Main SB St I-15 MtcWnley St orf to T Pierce St NB156 1-1 ELaOff Cq HOVIHOT lanes to �-15IOrrtario Av I an Off fromrom NB 1-15 Additional lane by restripe of existing lanes 2018 SR-91 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 332 35 SECTION 5: REFERENCES The following documents and resources were used in the development of the 2018 Plan. Data was provided by OCTA, RCTC, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12, Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA), other agencies and online resources. Measure M Next 10 Delivery Plan (Next 10 Plan), November 14, 2016 Riverside Transit Agency, Ten -Year Transit Network Plan, January 22, 2015 PSR PDS on Route 91 Between SR 57 and SR 55, October 2014 PS&E for "Westbound State Route 91 Auxiliary Lane from the NB SR-55N\B SR-91 Connector to the Tustin Avenue Interchange", 2014 PS&E for Initial SR-91 CIP Project, 2014 California Transportation C,orrnission, Comdor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA), Amended December 2012 M2020 Plan (Measure M), September 2012 PSR PDS for SR 241/SR 91 Connector, January 2012 Project Report and Environmental Document (ElR(EIS) for SR-91 CAPfrom SR 241 to Pierce Street Project, October 2012 PS&E "On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR 55 Interchange and the SR 91/SR 241 Interchange in Orange County", April 2011 Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Orange County SR-91 Corridor Final Report, August 2010 Project Study Report/Project Report "Right of Way Relinquishment on Westbound State Route 91 Between Weir Canyon Road and Coal Canyon", May 2010 SR 91/Fairmont Boulevard Feasibility Study, December 2009 Feasibility Evaluation Report for Irvine -Corona Expressway Tunnels, December 2009 Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for Eastbound SR-91 lane addition from SR 241 to SR 71, May 2009 PSR "On State Route 91 Between the SR-91/SR 55 Interchange and the SR 91/SR 241 Interchange in Orange County', April 2009 91 Express Lanes Extension and State Route 241 Connector Feasibility Study, March 2009 PSR/PR "On Gypsum Canyon Road Between the Gypsum Canyon Road/SR-91 VVestbound Off --Ramp (PM 16.4) and the Gypsum Canyon Road/SR-91 Eastbound Direct On -Ramp (PM 16.4)", June 2008 Orange County Transportation Authority Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan, November 2006 Riverside County -Orange County Major Investment Study (MIS) - Final Project Report: Locally Preferred Strategy Report, January 2006 California - Nevada Interstate Maglev Project Report, AnaheirrrOntario Segment; California -Nevada Super Speed Train Commission, American Magline Group, August 2003 Route Concept Reports for SR-91, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 Various Preliminary Drawings and Cross Sections, Caltrans Districts 8 and 12 2018 SR-91 Implementation Plan 333 36 AGENDA ITEM 8M RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Marlin Feenstra, Project Delivery Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 18-010, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Amending and Adopting Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act" STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to adopt Resolution No. 18-010, "Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Amending and Adopting Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act." BACKGROUND INFORMATION The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as contained in Public Resources Code sections 21000 et seq., is California's most comprehensive environmental law. It requires all public agencies within the state to evaluate the environmental effects of their actions before they are taken. CEQA also aims to prevent significant environmental effects from occurring as a result of agency actions by requiring agencies to avoid or reduce, when feasible, the significant environmental impacts of their decisions. To this end, CEQA requires all public agencies to adopt specific objectives, criteria and procedures for evaluating public and private projects that are undertaken or approved by such agencies. n►crucc►niv The Commission has prepared a proposed updated set of Local CEQA Guidelines for 2018 in compliance with CEQA's requirements. These Guidelines reflect recent changes in the Public Resources Code, the State CEQA Guidelines and relevant court opinions since the Commission last adopted CEQA guidelines in November 2010. These Local CEQA Guidelines also provide instructions and forms for preparing all environmental documents required under CEQA. No environmental impact is anticipated from amending the Local CEQA Guidelines. The Commission's adoption of the attached resolution is not a project under State CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) because it involves an administrative activity involving process only and would not result in any environmental impacts. Agenda Item 8M 334 A summary of the changes to the CEQA guidelines is attached. Attachments: 1) Revisions to Local CEQA Guidelines 2) Resolution No. 18-010 Agenda Item 8M 335 Attachment 1: Revisions to Local CEQA Guidelines. Revised Sections. 1. SECTION 3.11 PIPELINES WITHIN A PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND LESS THAN ONE MILE IN LENGTH Local Guidelines section 3.11 was changed pursuant to former Public Resources Code section 21080.21 that was repealed on by sunset date January 1, 2018 and replaced with a new Public Resources Code section 21080.21 regarding Pipelines within a public right-of-way and less than one mile in length. 2. SECTION 3.20 OTHER SPECIFIC EXEMPTIONS Pursuant to AB 1218, the sunset date established by Public Resources Code sections 21080.20 and 21080.20.5 statutory exemption for the approval of a bicycle transportation plan was extended through January 1, 2021. 3. SECTION 5.15 CONSULTATION WITH WATER AGENCIES REGARDING LARGE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Local Guidelines section 5.15 was amended to delete subsection (c) Water Supply Assessment Not Required for Certain Renewable Energy Projects because pursuant to Assembly Bill 2561, a portion of Water Code section 10912 expired on January 1, 2018 and was not renewed. Therefore, the exemption from preparing a water supply assessment for photovoltaic or wind energy generation facilities no longer applies. 4. SECTION 9 AFFORDABLE HOUSING In response to Senate Bill 35 and Assembly Bill 73, a new section 9 was added regarding affordable housing. Section 9.01 was added pursuant to Senate Bill 35 regarding the streamlined, ministerial approval process for affordable housing projects. Lastly, Section 9.02 was added regarding housing sustainability districts and the Public Resources Code sections 21155.10 and 21155.11 pursuant to Assembly Bill 73. 5. SECTION 10.03 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD Local Guidelines section 10.03.C. was changed to include the requirement of a lead agency to respond to a request for concurrent preparation of the administrative record by the project applicant within 10 business days from receipt of the written request or the request will automatically be deemed denied. Other Changes. Department of Fish and Wildlife. Effective January 1, 2018, the Department of Fish and Wildlife has increased some of its fees. For a Negative Declaration or a Mitigated Negative Declaration, the new filing fee is $2,280.75. For an Environmental Impact Report, the new filing fee is $3,168.00. For an environmental document pursuant to a Certified Regulatory Program, the filing fee has been increased to $1,077. 336 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 18-010 RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AMENDING AND ADOPTING LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (PUB. RESOURCES CODE §§ 21000 ET SEQ.) WHEREAS, the California Legislature has amended the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (Pub. Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq.), the Natural Resources Agency has amended portions of the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs, tit. 14, §§ 15000 et seq.), and the California courts have interpreted specific provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, Section 21082 of the Public Resources Code requires all public agencies to adopt objectives, criteria and procedures for the evaluation of public and private projects undertaken or approved by such public agencies, and the preparation, if required, of environmental impact reports and negative declarations in connection with that evaluation; and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC") must revise its local guidelines for implementing CEQA to make them consistent with the current provisions and interpretations of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE, the RCTC hereby resolves as follows: SECTION 1. The RCTC hereby adopts the "Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (2018 Revision)," a copy of which is on file at the offices of the Commission and is available for inspection by the public. SECTION 2. All prior actions of the RCTC enacting earlier guidelines are hereby repealed. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 2018. Dana W. Reed, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: Lisa Mobley Clerk of the Board Riverside County Transportation Commission 337 AGENDA ITEM 8N RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Mark Lancaster, Right of Way Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project — Railroad Agreements STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 18-31-152-00 with Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) for a license agreement for the Interstate 15 Express Lanes project (Project) in the amount of $22,000, plus a contingency amount of $2,200, for a total amount not to exceed $24,200; 2) Approve Agreement No. 18-31-153-00 with BNSF Railway (BNSF) for a construction and maintenance (C&M) agreement, including property acquisition, for the Project in the amount of $2,846,854, plus a contingency amount of $238,486, for a total amount not to exceed $3,085,340; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required by the Project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission, in cooperation with Caltrans, is improving the existing 1-15 corridor to include construction of new toll express lanes from Cajalco Road to State Route 60, a distance of approximately 15 miles through the cities of Corona, Eastvale, Jurupa Valley, and Norco as well as portions of unincorporated Riverside County, California. The Project is anticipated to improve mobility on 1-15 by enhancing operations and capacity with the addition of the toll facilities. The project limits extend from the Cajalco Road interchange on the south to the San Bernardino/Riverside County line on the north. The Project will require a license agreement with UPRR for a new 4" diameter conduit that will be attached to the northbound bridge structure over Mission Boulevard and the UPRR right of way. The conduit is to hold communication cables and electrical wiring for the toll lane system. UPRR representatives have agreed on a price of $22,000 for the new crossing, and staff proposes a $2,200 contingency amount for a total amount not to exceed $24,200. Agenda Item 8N 338 The Project will also require a C&M agreement with BNSF to allow new bridge structures to be constructed in BNSF's right of way for widening of the 1-15 mainline structures over the Porphyry Yard at the 1-15/State Route 91 interchange as part of the Project. The C&M agreement will include payment for track relocation work by BNSF estimated at $750,000, flagging and plan review costs by BNSF estimated at $1,634,854, and the cost for temporary and permanent easements required for the Project negotiated at $462,000. Staff and BNSF estimated and negotiated these costs totaling $2,846,854 for these work elements, and staff proposes a $238,486 contingency amount for a total authorization of $3,085,340. The Commission would pay actual costs where the values are estimated. Staff recommends the Commission authorize the Executive Director to execute the railroad agreements on behalf of the Commission and authorize the Executive Director or her designee to approve the use of the contingency amounts as may be required by the Project. Financial Information Yes FY 2018/19 $1,986,200 In Fiscal Year Budget: N/A Year: FY 2019/20 Amount: $1,123,340 Source of Funds: Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Budget Adjustment: No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 003027 81401 00000 0000 262 3181401 003027 81402 00000 0000 262 3181402 Fiscal Procedures Approved: �� Date: 05/25/2018 Attachments: 1) Agreement 18-31-152-00 (Draft) 2) Agreement 18-31-153-00 (Draft) Agenda Item 8N 339 ATTACHMENT 1 RCTC Agreement No. 18-31-152-00 Wireline Crossing 080808 Last Modified: 03/29/10 Form Approved, AVP-Law WIRELINE CROSSING AGREEMENT Mile Post: 43.87, Los Angeles Subdivision Location: Ontario, San Bernardino County, California Folder No. 03082-40 THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of March 20, 2018, ("Effective Date") by and between UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, ("Licensor") and RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, to be addressed at 4080 Lemon St. 3rd Floor, Riverside, California 92501 ("Licensee"). IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO AS FOLLOWS: Article 1. LICENSOR GRANTS RIGHT. In consideration of the covenants and agreements herein contained to be by the Licensee kept, observed and performed, the Licensor hereby grants to the Licensee the right to construct and thereafter, during the term hereof, to maintain and operate one overhead fiber optic wireline inside conduit attached to Caltrans bridge across Licensor's track(s) and property (the "Wireline") in the location shown and in conformity with the dimensions and specifications indicated on the attached print dated February 20, 2018, marked Exhibit "A" attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. Under no circumstances shall Licensee modify the use of the Wireline for a purpose other than for the purpose set forth in this Article I, and the Wireline shall not be used for any other use, whether such use is currently technologically possible, or whether such use may come into existence during the life of this Agreement. Under no circumstances shall Licensee modify the Wireline or add additional wirelines to the conduit, or allow any third -parties to modify the Wireline or add additional wirelines to the conduit, without Licensor's prior review and approval, which may be withheld in Licensor's sole discretion. Any application to modify the Wireline or add additional wirelines to the conduit shall be made in accordance with Licensor's then -current wireline engineering standards. For the purposes of Exhibit A, Licensee acknowledges that if it or its contractor provides to Railroad digital imagery depicting the Wireline crossing, Licensee authorizes Railroad to use the Digital Imagery in preparing the print attached as an exhibit hereto. Licensee represents and warrants that through a license or otherwise, it has the right to use the Digital Imagery and to permit Railroad to use the Digital Imagery in said manner. Article 2. LICENSE FEE. Upon execution of this Agreement, the Licensee shall pay to the Licensor a one-time License Fee of Twenty Two Thousand Dollars ($22,000.00). 340 Article 3. CONSTRUCTION. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION The grant of right herein made to the Licensee is subject to each and all of the terms, provisions, conditions, limitations and covenants set forth herein and in Exhibit B, attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof Article 4. DEFINITION OF LICENSEE. For purposes of this Agreement, all references in this Agreement to the Licensee shall include the Licensee's contractors, subcontractors, officers, agents and employees, and others acting under its or their authority. If a contractor is hired by the Licensee for any work performed on the Wireline (including initial construction and subsequent relocation or maintenance and repair work), then the Licensee shall provide a copy of this Agreement to its contractor and require its contractor to comply with all the terms and provisions hereof relating to the work to be performed. Any contractor or subcontractor shall be deemed an agent of Licensee for the purpose of this Agreement, and Licensee shall require such contractor or subcontractor to release, defend and indemnify Licensor to the same extent and under the same terms and conditions as Licensee is required to release, defend and indemnify Licensor herein. Article 5. INSURANCE. A. During the life of this Agreement, Licensee shall fully comply with insurance requirements described in Exhibit C. B. Failure to maintain insurance as required shall entitle, but not require, Licensor to terminate this License immediately. C. If the Licensee is subject to statute(s) limiting its insurance liability and/or limiting its ability to obtain insurance in compliance with Exhibit C of this license, those statutes shall apply. D. Licensee hereby acknowledges that it has reviewed the requirements of Exhibit C, including without limitation the requirement for Railroad Protective Liability Insurance during construction, maintenance, installation, repair or removal of the wireline which is the subject of this Agreement. 341 Article 6. TERM. This Agreement shall take effect as of the Effective Date first herein written and shall continue in full force and effect until terminated as herein provided. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first herein written. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY LM- Valerie Harrill Sr. Analyst RE - Utilities RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Name Printed: Title: 342 PLACE ARROW INDICATING NORTH OVERHEADDIRECTION RELATIVE TO CROSSING WIRELINE CROSSING ST 7 750 VOLTS OR LESS FORM OR-0404-D NOTL: ALL AVAILA13LL DIMENSIONS MU51 BE REV10-26-2007 FILLED IN TO PROCESS THIS APPLICATION. www.uprr.com NO SCALE -\ (OR LEGAL SURVEY LIN[L WHERE APPLICABLE) LINE SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE —,_MERIDIAN ® RR' S RIV 4588 , FT. LEI FT.692 O -�—_------ FT. 2994 FT. �I AFT. Iu — i o Pomona -A- 119 < 35 a (NEAREST R.R. TOWN) IN ¢� IANGLE OF CROSSG) °a'w TO Pedley ....., ,-� MAIN TRACK z S (NEAREST R.R. TOWN) E. EOP of SB I-15 E. Line of See. 6 (2S 6VV1 ; I DESCRIDE FIXED OBJECT) (DESCRIBE. FIXED OB,IEf.TI D FT. I DISTANCE ALONG TRACK FROM SECTION LINE CROSSING) Let: 34.02896766375 (ND1E7 THIS DIMENSION IRE IN ALL CASES. AT LOCATIONS NOT USING SECTIONS. DISTANCE Long:-117.5497509 TO A LEGAL SURVEY LINE 15 REQUIREDi RR' S R!l k--- - FT. SHOW PLACEMENT OF GUY ANCHORS O ---� f N/AFT. FT. (M(N.4`) — N/A FT. ' 27.85FT. ? GROUND wTOF-OF-RAIL al.fFACF ¢ , -RR SIGNAL B Y CONM. LINE LGGRkrF ROADBED I,rr 14_FT.35 FT. — N/A FT. ( M IN. 50'N/A FT. ( MIN. 50' 1 — NOTES : Wlreline to be located within the eastern edge of the SB 1-15 bridge overpass. SEE WIRELINE INSTALLATION ENGINEERING SPECIFICIATIONS AI TYPE WIRELINE CROSSING: FIBER OPT) BI VOLTAGE TO BE CARRIED 0 NO. OF WIRES 1 C) CURRENT TO BE CARRIED 0 D) WIRELINE WILL PASS UPRR COMMUNICATION OR SIGNAL LINE? WHAT IS THE MINIMUM CLEARANCE BETWEEN WIRES? FEET, El WILL ANY ATTACHMENTS BE MADE TO ANY EXISTING POLES? NO F) WILL ANY ATTACHMENTS BE MADE TO RAILROAD'S POLES? NO 3) WHAT TYPE OF FACILITY WILL LINE BE SERVING? TOLL COLLECTION YSTEM �I APPLICANT HAS CONTACTED 1-800-336-9193, U. P. COMMUNICATION DEPARTMENT, AND HAS DETERMINED FIBER OPTIC CABLE EM S NOT EXIST IN VICINITY OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED. TICKET NO. - lEX1HIBIT "A" - - (FOR RAILROAD U5E ONLY - DO NOT (/.RITE IN THIS BO%I UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. Los Angeles Sub Page 1 of 3 I WWI VISION, M. Pe 43.87 Ea Se 2317+421 OVERHEAD WIRELINE CROSSING ONTARIO SAN BERNARDINO CA 1 NEAREST RR STATION) ICIIURTYI 1sTaTIi FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION IA-L I CAN I RR FILE NO, 0308240 D A T E 02/20/2018 W A R N I N G IN ALL OCCASIONS, U. P. COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT MUST BE CONTACTED IN ADVANCE OF ANY WORK TO DETERMINE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF FIBER OPTIC CABLE. PHONE : 1-800-336-9193 343 " E F NOTES: CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR SCHEDULE 1. FOR ACCURATE RIGHT OF WAY DATA, CONTACT RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING AT THE DISTRICT OFFICE. 2. SEE SHEET E-5DO 6 E-501 FOR NOTES, LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS. 3. SEE SHEETS E-405 TO E-420 FOR � TO Exiai AND NEW LIGHTING PULL BOXES. CONDUCTOR RUN  1 ��a-- 0�� D6 RIN/sea 1s I ...s I I r �� �� �� RVfll..rREek,pNRIEPI�EflR a a AETEC fflGIREEflI yyyA,��":,QTY tll E yIER STE 350 ��I IY1��"i11L;r'TI hU iLq SAN1A AIA, CA 91I05 PROJECT NOTES (THIS SHEET ONLY): ALL CONDUITS AND CONDUCTORS ARE NEW UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. O1 CONSTRUCT TCS AND POWER CONDUIT IN SAME TRENCH. SEE SHEET E0-610 FOR TRENCH DETAIL. CORfatf in advance to determine existence of Fiber Optic Cable 1(800)336.9193 '�'i; j Exhibit "A" Page 2 of 3 /. ANION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY �� LOS ANGELES SUBDIVISION ����" j l Lioenaee: Riverside County Traluponetion Comm nslon RAILROAD MILE POST 43A7 ��R " ' f Ontario, San Bernardino County, CA 14j - Folder No. 3082-40 ,. f m RAMP S_W W .. SB ROUTE 15 ff.A;L�� J _ R4Sl7 15 / lcl�� �� ��- m `_w B 5 Tqo I t " I 15' LINE  E---��w it ro  z ' , ' sro--zrsQo t u, J 119 �� I I i - RAMP E-Nfo 4 J' / Exlst CALTRANS CCTV x Exiai 4"C WITH 9-1" INNERDUCT< ICT) INNERDUCT I: I- Exisi TYPE E CADLE (Ci) (^ 1 INNERDUCT 2: ADD 1-12 SMFO CABLE FOR TCS CONCRETE I I INNERDUCT 3,4: Ezlat PT (CT) BRIDGE BARRIER I fJ q" TYPE 1 CONDUIT WITH CONDUIT I '��' BACK CLAMPS AT 5'0" O.C. INSTALL ' jEXPANSION FITTING AT ALL BRIDGE E%PANSI ON JOINTS PER RSP ES-9B. CONDUIT AND ALL BRACKETS WILL BE PAINTED TO MATCH BRIDGE COLOR, DETAIL A CONDUIT ATTACHMENT TO N MISSION Blvd BRIDGE APPROVED FOR ELECTRICAL WORK ONLY DORMER LAST REVISEO 7/2/2010 ��1CeggOtKq41NEe ��, a IT IN INCREa Evisi 4% WITH 4-1" INNERDUCiS (Ci) INNERDUCT 1: 1- Exist TYPE E CABLE (CT) eo INNERDUCT 2: ADD 1-72 SMFO CABLE FOR TCS 53 INNERDUCT 3,4: Ex tat PT (CT) nE TRAFFIC MONITORING SYSTEMS g WW MODIFYING EXISTING ELECTRICAL SYSTEM (Comm, CMS, CCTV, TMS, TCS) SCALE: I" = 50' E-822 UNIT 0000 PRD.IEOT N11-- a . c n.nnnnnn.. 344 345 Form Approved, AVP-Law Updated 063008 EXHIBIT B Section 1. LIMITATION AND SUBORDINATION OF RIGHTS GRANTED The foregoing grant of right is subject and subordinate to the prior and continuing right and obligation of the Licensor to use and maintain its entire property including the right and power of the Licensor to construct, maintain, repair, renew, use, operate, change, modify or relocate railroad tracks, signal, communication, fiber optics, or other wirelines, pipelines and other facilities upon, along or across any or all parts of its property, all or any of which may be freely done at any time or times by the Licensor without liability to the Licensee or to any other party for compensation or damages. The foregoing grant is also subject to all outstanding superior rights (including those in favor of licensees and lessees of the Licensor's property, and others) and the right of the Licensor to renew and extend the same, and is made without covenant of title or for quiet enjoyment. Section 2. CONSTRUCTION. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION A. The Wireline shall be designed, constructed, operated, maintained, repaired, renewed, modified and/or reconstructed by the Licensee in strict conformity with (i) Licensor's current standards and specifications ("UP Specifications"), except for variances approved in advance in writing by the Licensor's Assistant Vice President Engineering — Design, or his authorized representative; (ii) such other additional safety standards as the Licensor, in its sole discretion, elects to require, including, without limitation, American Railway Engineering and Maintenance -of -Way Association ("AREMA") standards and guidelines (collectively, "UP Additional Requirements"), and (iii) all applicable laws, rules and regulations ("Laws"). If there is any conflict between the requirements of any Law and the UP Specifications or the UP Additional Requirements, the most restrictive will apply. All work performed on property of the Licensor in connection with the design, construction, maintenance, repair, renewal, modification or reconstruction of the Wireline shall be done to the satisfaction of the Licensor. B. If the Wireline is an existing one not conforming in its construction to the above provisions of this Section 2, the Licensee shall, within ninety (90) days after the date hereof, reconstruct it so as to conform therewith. C. The Wireline shall be designed, constructed, maintained and operated by the Licensee in such manner as not to be or constitute a hazard to aviation. With respect to the Wireline the Licensee, without expense to the Licensor, will comply with all requirements of law and of public authority, whether federal, state or local, including but not limited to aviation authorities. D. In the operation of the Wireline, the Licensee shall not transmit electric current at a difference of potential in excess of the voltage indicated on Exhibit A. If the voltage indicated is in excess of seven hundred fifty (750) volts, and the Wireline is, or is to be, buried at any location on the property of the Licensor outside track ballast sections or roadbed, the Licensee shall install metallic conduit, or non-metallic conduit encased in a minimum of three (3) inches of concrete with a minimum of 346 four (4) feet of ground cover the entire length of the Wireline on the property of the Licensor. A Wireline buried by removal of the soil shall have, at a depth of one (1) foot beneath the surface of the ground directly above the Wireline, a six (6) inch wide warning tape bearing the warning, "Danger -High Voltage", or equivalent wording. A Wireline encased in conduit, jacked or bored under the property of the Licensor, must be identified by placing warning signs, to be installed and properly maintained at the expense of the Licensee, at each edge of the Licensor's property. The Licensee shall not utilize the signs in lieu of the warning tape where portions of the casing are installed by direct burial. E. Prior to the commencement of any work in connection with the design, construction, maintenance, repair, renewal, modification, relocation, reconstruction or removal of the Wireline, the Licensee shall submit to the Licensor plans setting out the method and manner of handling the work, including the shoring and cribbing, if any, required to protect the Licensor's operations, and shall not proceed with the work until such plans have been approved by the Licensor's Assistant Vice President Engineering Design, or his authorized representative, and then the work shall be done to the satisfaction of the Licensor's Assistant Vice President Engineering Design or his authorized representative. The Licensor shall have the right, if it so elects, to provide such support as it may deem necessary for the safety of its track or tracks during the time of construction, maintenance, repair, renewal, modification, relocation, reconstruction or removal of the Wireline, and, in the event the Licensor provides such support, the Licensee shall pay to the Licensor, within fifteen (15) days after bills shall have been rendered therefore, all expenses incurred by the Licensor in connection therewith, which expenses shall include all assignable costs. F. The Licensee shall keep and maintain the soil over the Wireline thoroughly compacted and the grade even with the adjacent surface of the ground. G. Licensee shall install aerial cable markers on all Wireline crossings. Aerial cable markers shall be in the color and design as customarily required by Wireline industry standards or as required by Licensor. H. In the prosecution of any work covered by this Agreement, Licensee shall secure any and all necessary permits and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and enactments affecting the work including, without limitation, all applicable Federal Railroad Administration regulations. Section 3. NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT OF WORK / LICENSOR REPRESENTATIVE / SUPERVISION / FLAGGING / SAFETY. A. If an emergency should arise requiring immediate attention, the Licensee shall provide as much notice as practicable to Licensor before commencing any work by calling the Response Management Communication Center (RMCC) at 888-877-7267. In all other situations, the Licensee shall notify the Licensor at least ten (10) days (or such other time as the Licensor may allow) in advance of the commencement of any work upon property of the Licensor in connection with the construction, maintenance, repair, renewal, modification, reconstruction, relocation or removal of the Wireline. All such work shall be prosecuted diligently to completion. The Licensee will coordinate its initial, and any subsequent work with the following employee of Licensor or his or her duly authorized representative (hereinafter "Licensor Representative" or "Railroad Representative"): 347 Railpros Flagging upflagaaxailprods.com (877) 315-0513 X 116 JOSE D. GARCIA MGR SIGNAL MNTCE 2015 S WILLOW Bloomington, CA 92316 Cell Phone: 323-312-9382 Email address: jd arcia&up com B. Licensee, at its own expense, shall adequately police and supervise all work to be performed. The responsibility of Licensee for safe conduct and adequate policing and supervision of work shall not be lessened or otherwise affected by Licensor's approval of plans and specifications involving the work, or by Licensor's collaboration in performance of any work, or by the presence at the work site of a Licensor Representative, or by compliance by Licensee with any requests or recommendations made by the Licensor Representative. C. At the request of Licensor, Licensee shall remove from Licensor's property any employee who fails to conform to the instructions of the Licensor Representative in connection with the work on Licensor's property. Licensee shall indemnify Licensor against any claims arising from the removal of any such employee from Licensor's property. D. Licensee shall notify the Licensor Representative at least ten (10) working days in advance of proposed performance of any work in which any person or equipment will be within twenty-five (25) feet of any track, or will be near enough to any track that any equipment extension (such as, but not limited to, a crane boom) will reach to within twenty-five (25) feet of any track. No work of any kind shall be performed, and no person, equipment, machinery, tool(s), material(s), vehicle(s), or thing(s) shall be located, operated, placed, or stored within twenty-five (25) feet of any of Licensor's track(s) at any time, for any reason, unless and until a railroad flagman is provided to watch for trains. Upon receipt of such ten (10) day notice, the Licensor Representative will determine and inform Licensee whether a flagman need be present and whether any special protective or safety measures need to be implemented. If flagging or other special protective or safety measures are performed by Licensor, Licensor will bill Licensee for such expenses incurred by Licensor, unless Licensor and a federal, state or local governmental entity have agreed that Licensor is to bill such expenses to the federal, state or local governmental entity. If Licensor will be sending the bills to Licensee, Licensee shall pay such bills within thirty (30) days of receipt of billing. If Licensor performs any flagging, or other special protective or safety measures are performed by Licensor, Licensee agrees that Licensee is not relieved of any of responsibilities or liabilities set forth in this Agreement. E. The rate of pay per hour for each flagman will be the prevailing hourly rate in effect for an eight -hour day for the class of flagmen used during regularly assigned hours and overtime in accordance with Labor Agreements and Schedules in effect at the time the work is performed. In addition to the cost of such labor, a composite charge for vacation, holiday, health and welfare, supplemental sickness, Railroad Retirement and unemployment compensation, supplemental pension, Employees Liability and Property Damage and Administration will be included, computed on actual payroll. The composite charge will be the prevailing composite charge in effect at the time the work is performed. One and one-half times the current hourly rate is paid for overtime, Saturdays and Sundays, and two and one- half times current hourly rate for holidays. Wage rates are subject to change, at any time, by law or by 348 agreement between Licensor and its employees, and may be retroactive as a result of negotiations or a ruling of an authorized governmental agency. Additional charges on labor are also subject to change. If the wage rate or additional charges are changed, Licensee (or the governmental entity, as applicable) shall pay on the basis of the new rates and charges. F. Reimbursement to Licensor will be required covering the full eight -hour day during which any flagman is furnished, unless the flagman can be assigned to other railroad work during a portion of such day, in which event reimbursement will not be required for the portion of the day during which the flagman is engaged in other railroad work. Reimbursement will also be required for any day not actually worked by the flagman following the flagman's assignment to work on the project for which Licensor is required to pay the flagman and which could not reasonably be avoided by Licensor by assignment of such flagman to other work, even though Licensee may not be working during such time. When it becomes necessary for'L icensor to bulletin and assign an employee to a flagging position in compliance with union collective bargaining agreements, Licensee must provide Licensor a minimum of five (5) days notice prior to the cessation of the need for a flagman. If five (5) days notice of cessation is not given, Licensee will still be required to pay flagging charges for the five (5) day notice period required by union agreement to be given to the employee, even though flagging is not required for that period. An additional ten (10) days notice must then be given to Licensor if flagging services are needed again after such five day cessation notice has been given to Licensor. G. Safety of personnel, property, rail operations and the public is of paramount importance in the prosecution of the work performed by Licensee or its contractor. Licensee shall be responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety, operations and programs in connection with the work. Licensee and its contractor shall at a minimum comply with Licensor's safety standards listed in Exhibit D, hereto attached, to ensure uniformity with the safety standards followed by Licensoe's own forces. As a part of Licensee's safety responsibilities, Licensee shall notify Licensor if it determines that any of Licensoe's safety standards are contrary to good safety practices. Licensee and its contractor shall furnish copies of Exhibit D to each of its employees before they enter the job site. H. Without limitation of the provisions of paragraph G above, Licensee shall keep the job site free from safety and health hazards and ensure that their employees and contractors and subcontractors are competent and adequately trained in all safety and health aspects of the job. I. Licensee shall have proper first aid supplies available on the job site so that prompt first aid services may be provided to any person injured on the job site. Prompt notification shall be given to Licensor of any U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration reportable injuries. Licensee shall have a non -delegable duty to control its employees while they are on the job site or any other property of Licensor, and to be certain they do not use, be under the influence of, or have in their possession any alcoholic beverage, drug or other substance that may inhibit the safe performance of any work. J. If and when requested by Licensor, Licensee shall deliver to Licensor a copy of its safety plan for conducting the work (the "Safety Plan"). Licensor shall have the right, but not the obligation, to require Licensee to correct any deficiencies in the Safety Plan. The terms of this Agreement shall control if there are any inconsistencies between this Agreement and the Safety Plan. Section 4. LICENSEE TO BEAR ENTIRE EXPENSE. The Licensee shall bear the entire cost and expense incurred in connection with the design, construction, maintenance, repair and renewal and any and all modification, revision, relocation, removal or reconstruction of the Wireline, including any and all expense which may be incurred by the Licensor in connection therewith for supervision, inspection, flagging, or otherwise. 349 Section 5. REINFORCEMENT, RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF WIRELINE A. The license herein granted is subject to the needs and requirements of the Licensor in the safe and efficient operation of its railroad and in the improvement and use of its property. The Licensee shall, at the sole expense of the Licensee, reinforce or otherwise modify the Wireline, or move all or any portion of the Wireline to such new location, or remove the Wireline from the Licensor's property, as the Licensor may designate, whenever, in the furtherance of its needs and requirements, the Licensor, at its sole election, finds such action necessary or desirable. B. All the terms, conditions and stipulations herein expressed with reference to the Wireline on property of the Licensor in the location hereinbefore described shall, so far as the Wireline remains on the property, apply to the Wireline as modified, changed or relocated within the contemplation of this section. Section 6. NO INTERFERENCE WITH LICENSOR'S OPERATION A. The Wireline and all parts thereof within and outside of the limits of the property of the Licensor shall be designed, constructed and, at all times, maintained, repaired, renewed and operated in such manner as to cause no interference whatsoever with the constant, continuous and uninterrupted use of the tracks, property and facilities of the Licensor (including without limitation, its tracks, pole lines, communication lines, radio equipment, wayside and/or cab based train signal systems, advanced train control systems, positive train separation systems, and grade crossing systems), and nothing shall be done or suffered to be done by the Licensee at any time that would in any manner impair the safety thereof. B. In the operation and maintenance of the Wireline the Licensee shall take all suitable precaution to prevent any interference (by induction, leakage of electricity, or otherwise) with the operation of the signal, communication lines or other installations or facilities of the Licensor or of its tenants; and if, at any time, the operation or maintenance of the Wireline results in any electrostatic effects which the Licensor deems undesirable or harmful, or causes interference with the operation of the signal, communication lines or other installations or facilities, as now existing or which may hereafter be provided by the Licensor and/or its tenants, the Licensee shall, at the sole expense of the Licensee, immediately make such modifications or take such action as may be necessary to eliminate, such interference. Licensee agrees to pay for any reasonable modifications, design changes, or increased costs that may be necessary now or in the future to ensure safe and reliable maintenance and operation of the facilities of Licensor and/or its tenants because of interference from the Wireline. C. Explosives or other highly flammable substances shall not be stored on Licensor's property without the prior written approval of Licensor. D. No additional vehicular crossings (including temporary Licensee haul roads) or pedestrian crossings over Licensor's trackage shall be installed or used by Licensee or its contractors without the prior written permission of Licensor. E. When not in use, any machinery and materials of Licensee or its contractors shall be kept at least fifty (50) feet from the centerline of Licensor's nearest track. F. Operations of Licensor and work performed by Licensor's personnel may cause delays in the work to be performed by Licensee. Licensee accepts this risk and agrees that Licensor shall have no liability to Licensee or any other person or entity for any such delays. Licensee shall coordinate its activities with those of Licensor and third parties so as to avoid interference with railroad operations. The 350 safe operation of Licensor's train movements and other activities by Licensor take precedence over any work to be performed by Licensee. Section 7. PROTECTION OF FIBER OPTIC CABLE SYSTEMS. A. Fiber optic cable systems may be buried on the Licensor's property. Protection of the fiber optic cable systems is of extreme importance since any break could disrupt service to users resulting in business interruption and loss of revenue and profits. Licensee shall telephone the Licensor during normal business hours (7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Central Time, Monday through Friday, except for holidays) at 1-800-336-9193 (also a 24-hour, 7-day number for emergency calls) to determine if fiber optic cable is buried anywhere on the Licensor's premises to be used by the Licensee. If it is, Licensee will telephone the telecommunications company(ies) involved, arrange for a cable locator, make arrangements for relocation or other protection of the fiber optic cable, all at Licensee's expense, and will commence no work on the Licensor's property until all such protection or relocation has been accomplished. Licensee shall indemnify and hold the Licensor harmless from and against all costs, liability and expense whatsoever (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees, court costs and expenses) arising out of or caused in any way by Licensee's failure to comply with the provisions of this paragraph. B. IN ADDITION TO OTHER INDEMNITY PROVISIONS IN THIS AGREEMENT, THE LICENSEE SHALL, AND SHALL CAUSE ITS CONTRACTOR TO, RELEASE, INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD THE LICENSOR HARMLESS FROM AND AGAINST ALL COSTS, LIABILITY AND EXPENSE WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ATTORNEYS' FEES, COURT COSTS AND EXPENSES) CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENCE OF THE LICENSEE, ITS CONTRACTORS, AGENTS AND/OR EMPLOYEES, RESULTING IN (1) ANY DAMAGE TO OR DESTRUCTION OF ANY TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM ON LICENSOR'S PROPERTY, AND/OR (2) ANY INJURY TO OR DEATH OF ANY PERSON EMPLOYED BY OR ON BEHALF OF ANY TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, AND/OR ITS CONTRACTOR, AGENTS AND/OR EMPLOYEES, ON LICENSOR'S PROPERTY, EXCEPT IF SUCH COSTS, LIABILITY OR EXPENSES ARE CAUSED SOLELY BY THE DIRECT ACTIVE NEGLIGENCE OF THE LICENSOR. LICENSEE FURTHER AGREES THAT IT SHALL NOT HAVE OR SEEK RECOURSE AGAINST LICENSOR FOR ANY CLAIM OR CAUSE OF ACTION FOR ALLEGED LOSS OF PROFITS OR REVENUE OR LOSS OF SERVICE OR OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE TO A TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY USING LICENSOR'S PROPERTY OR A CUSTOMER OR USER OF SERVICES OF THE FIBER OPTIC CABLE ON LICENSOR'S PROPERTY. Section 8. CLAIMS AND LIENS FOR LABOR AND MATERIAL• TAXES. A. The Licensee shall fully pay for all materials joined or affixed to and labor performed upon property of the Licensor in connection with the construction, maintenance, repair, renewal, modification or reconstruction of the Wireline, and shall not permit or suffer any mechanic's or materialman's lien of any kind or nature to be enforced against the property for any work done or materials furnished thereon at the instance or request or on behalf of the Licensee. The Licensee shall indemnify and hold harmless the Licensor against and from any and all liens, claims, demands, costs and expenses of whatsoever nature in any way connected with or growing out of such work done, labor performed, or materials furnished. B. The Licensee shall promptly pay or discharge all taxes, charges and assessments levied upon, in respect to, or on account of the Wireline, to prevent the same from becoming a charge or lien upon property of the Licensor, and so that the taxes, charges and assessments levied upon or in respect to 351 such property shall not be increased because of the location, construction or maintenance of the Wireline or any improvement, appliance or fixture connected therewith placed upon such property, or on account of the Licensee's interest therein. Where such tax, charge or assessment may not be separately made or assessed to the Licensee but shall be included in the assessment of the property of the Licensor, then the Licensee shall pay to the Licensor an equitable proportion of such taxes determined by the value of the Licensee's property upon property of the Licensor as compared with the entire value of such property. Section 9. RESTORATION OF LICENSOR'S PROPERTY In the event the Licensee in any manner moves or disturbs any of the property of the Licensor in connection with the construction, maintenance, repair, renewal, modification, reconstruction, relocation or removal of the Wireline, then in that event the Licensee shall, as soon as possible and at Licensee's sole expense, restore property to the same condition as the same were in before such property was moved or disturbed, and the Licensee shall indemnify and hold harmless the Licensor, its officers, agents and employees, against and from any and all liability, loss, damages, claims, demands, costs and expenses of whatsoever nature, including court costs and attorneys' fees, which may result from injury to or death of persons whomsoever, or damage to or loss or destruction of property whatsoever, when such injury, death, damage, loss or destruction grows out of or arises from the moving or disturbance of any property of the Licensor. Section 10. INDEMNITY. A. As used in this Section, "Licensor" includes other railroad companies using the Licensor's property at or near the location of the Licensee's installation and their officers, agents, and employees; "Loss" includes loss, damage, claims, demands, actions, causes of action, penalties, costs, and expenses of whatsoever nature, including court costs and attorneys' fees, which may result from: (a) injury to or death of persons whomsoever (including the Licensor's officers, agents, and employees, the Licensee's officers, agents, and employees, as well as any other person); and/or (b) damage to or loss or destruction of property whatsoever (including Licensee's property, damage to the roadbed, tracks, equipment, or other property of the Licensor, or property in its care or custody). B. AS A MAJOR INDUCEMENT AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE LICENSE AND PERMISSION HEREIN GRANTED, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE LICENSEE SHALL, AND SHALL CAUSE ITS CONTRACTOR TO, RELEASE, INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE LICENSOR FROM ANY LOSS OF ANY KIND, NATURE OR DESCRIPTION ARISING OUT OF, RESULTING FROM OR RELATED TO (IN WHOLE,OR IN PART): 1. THE PROSECUTION OF ANY WORK CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT INCLUDING THE INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, RENEWAL, MODIFICATION, RECONSTRUCTION, RELOCATION, OR REMOVAL OF THE WIRELINE OR ANY PART THEREOF; 2. ANY RIGHTS OR INTERESTS GRANTED PURSUANT TO THIS LICENSE; 3. THE PRESENCE, OPERATION, OR USE OF THE WIRELINE OR ELECTRICAL INTERFERENCE OR OTHER TYPES OF INTERFERENCE CREATED OR CAUSED BY THE WIRELINE OR ESCAPING FROM THE WIRELINE; 352 4. THE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS OF THE PROPERTY CAUSED BY OR CONTRIBUTED BY LICENSEE; 5. ANY ACT OR OMISSION OF LICENSEE OR LICENSEE'S OFFICERS, AGENTS, INVITEES, EMPLOYEES, OR CONTRACTORS OR ANYONE DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY EMPLOYED BY ANY OF THEM, OR ANYONE THEY CONTROL OR EXERCISE CONTROL OVER; OR 6. LICENSEE'S BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT, EXCEPT WHERE THE LOSS IS CAUSED BY THE SOLE DIRECT AND ACTIVE NEGLIGENCE OF THE LICENSOR, AS DETERMINED IN A FINAL JUDGMENT BY A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION, IT BEING THE INTENTION OF THE PARTIES THAT THE ABOVE INDEMNITY WILL OTHERWISE APPLY TO LOSSES CAUSED BY OR ARISING FROM, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, LICENSOR' S NEGLIGENCE. C. Upon written notice from Licensor, Licensee agrees to assume the defense of any lawsuit of proceeding brought against any indemnitee by any entity, relating to any matter covered by this License for which Licensee has an obligation to assume liability for and/or save and hold harmless any indemnitee. Licensee shall pay all costs incident to such defense, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney's fees, investigators' fees, litigation and appeal expenses, settlement payments and amounts paid in satisfaction of judgments. Section 11. REMOVAL OF WIRELINE UPON TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. Prior to the termination of this Agreement howsoever, the Licensee shall, at Licensee's sole expense, remove the Wireline from those portions of the property not occupied by the roadbed and track or tracks of the Licensor and shall restore, to the satisfaction of the Licensor, such portions of such property to as good a condition as they were in at the time of the construction of the Wireline. If the Licensee fails to do the foregoing, the Licensor may, but is not obligated, perform such work of removal and restoration at the cost and expense of the Licensee. In the event of the removal by the Licensor of the property of the Licensee and of the restoration of the roadbed and property as herein provided, the Licensor shall in no manner be liable to the Licensee for any damage sustained by the Licensee for or on account thereof, and such removal and restoration shall in no manner prejudice or impair any right of action for damages, or otherwise, that the Licensor may have against the Licensee. Section 12. WAIVER OF BREACH. The waiver by the Licensor of the breach of any condition, covenant or agreement herein contained to be kept, observed and performed by the Licensee shall in no way impair the right of the Licensor to avail itself of any remedy for any subsequent breach thereof. Section 13. TERMINATION. A. If the Licensee does not use the right herein granted or the Wireline for one (1) year, or if the Licensee continues in default in the performance of any covenant or agreement herein contained for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice from the Licensor to the Licensee specifying such default, the Licensor may, at its option, forthwith immediately terminate this Agreement by written notice. B. In addition to the provisions of subparagraph (a) above, this Agreement may be terminated by written notice given by either party hereto to the other on any date in such notice stated, not less, 353 however, than thirty (30) days subsequent to the date upon which such notice shall be given. C. Notice of default and notice of termination may be served personally upon the Licensee or by mailing to the last known address of the Licensee. Termination of this Agreement for any reason shall not affect any of the rights or obligations of the parties hereto which may have accrued, or liabilities, accrued or otherwise, which may have arisen prior thereto. Section 14. AGREEMENT NOT TO BE ASSIGNED. The Licensee shall not assign this Agreement, in whole or in part, or any rights herein granted, without the written consent of the Licensor, and it is agreed that any transfer or assignment or attempted transfer or assignment of this Agreement or any of the rights herein granted, whether voluntary, by operation of law, or otherwise, without such consent in writing, shall be absolutely void and, at the option of the Licensor, shall terminate this Agreement. Section 15. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. Subject to the provisions of Section 14 hereof, this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. Section 16. SEVERABILITY. Any provision of this Agreement which is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable shall be invalid or unenforceable only to the extent of such determination, which shall not invalidate or otherwise render ineffective any other provision of this Agreement. 354 Approved: Insurance Group Created: 9/23/05 Last Modified: 03/29/10 Form Approved, AVP-Law EXHIBIT C Union Pacific Railroad Company Contract Insurance Requirements Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, procure and maintain during the life of this Agreement (except as otherwise provided in this Agreement) the following insurance coverage: A. Commercial General Liability insurance. Commercial general liability (CGL) with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 each occurrence and an aggregate limit of not less than $4,000,000. CGL insurance must be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 12 04 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage). The policy must also contain the following endorsement, WHICH MUST BE STATED ON THE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE: "Contractual Liability Railroads" ISO form CG 24 17 10 01 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage) showing "Union Pacific Railroad Company Property" as the Designated Job Site. B. Business Automobile Coverage insurance. Business auto coverage written on ISO form CA 00 O1 10 01 (or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage) with a limit of not less $2,000,000 for each accident, and coverage must include liability arising out of any auto (including owned, hired, and non -owned autos). The policy must contain the following endorsements, WHICH MUST BE STATED ON THE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE: "Coverage For Certain Operations In Connection With Railroads" ISO form CA 20 70 10 01 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage) showing "Union Pacific Property" as the Designated Job Site. C. Workers Compensation and Employers Liability insurance. Coverage must include but not be limited to: Licensee's statutory liability under the workers' compensation laws of the state(s) affected by this Agreement. Employers' Liability (Part B) with limits of at least $500,000 each accident, $500,000 disease policy limit $500,000 each employee. If Licensee is self -insured, evidence of state approval and excess workers compensation coverage must be provided. Coverage must include liability arising out of the U. S. Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Act, the Jones Act, and the Outer Continental Shelf Land Act, if applicable. D. Railroad Protective Liability insurance. Licensee must maintain "Railroad Protective Liability" insurance written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 35 12 04 (or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage) on behalf of Railroad only as named insured, with a limit of not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and an aggregate of $6,000,000. The definition of "JOB LOCATION" and "WORK" on the declaration page of the policy shall 355 refer to this Agreement and shall describe all WORK or OPERATIONS performed under this agreement E. Umbrella or Excess insurance. If Licensee utilizes umbrella or excess policies, and these policies must "follow form" and afford no less coverage than the primary policy. Other Reauirements F. All policy(ies) required above (except worker's compensation and employers liability) must include Railroad as "Additional Insured" using ISO Additional Insured Endorsements CG 20 26, and CA 20 48 (or substitute forms providing equivalent coverage). The coverage provided to Railroad as additional insured shall, to the extent provided under ISO Additional Insured Endorsement CG 20 26, and CA 20 48 provide coverage for Railroad's negligence whether sole or partial, active or passive, and shall not be limited by Licensee's liability under the indemnity provisions of this Agreement. G. Punitive damages exclusion, if any, must be deleted (and the deletion indicated on the certificate of insurance), unless (a) insurance coverage may not lawfully be obtained for any punitive damages that may arise under this agreement, or (b) all punitive damages are prohibited by all states in which this agreement will be performed. H. Licensee waives all rights of recovery, and its insurers also waive all rights of subrogation of damages against Railroad and its agents, officers, directors and employees for damages covered by the workers compensation and employers liability or commercial umbrella or excess liability obtained by Licensee required in this agreement, where permitted by law. This waiver must be stated on the certificate of insurance. I. All insurance policies must be written by a reputable insurance company acceptable to Railroad or with a current Best's Insurance Guide Rating of A- and Class VII or better, and authorized to do business in the state(s) in which the work is to be performed. J. The fact that insurance is obtained by Licensee or by Railroad on behalf of Licensee will not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of Licensee, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this Agreement. Damages recoverable by Railroad from Licensee or any third party will not be limited by the amount of the required insurance coverage. 356 Form Approved, AVP-Law Updated 063008 EXHIBIT D SAFETY STANDARDS MINIMUM SAFETY REQUIREMENTS The term "employees" as used herein refer to all employees of Licensee or its contractors, subcontractors, or agent of Licensee. I. Clothing A. All employees of Licensee will be suitably dressed to perform their duties safely and in a manner that will not interfere with their vision, hearing, or free use of their hands or feet. Specifically, Licensee's employees must wear: (i) Waist -length shirts with sleeves. Trousers that cover the entire leg. If flare -legged trousers are worn, the trouser bottoms must be tied to prevent catching. Footwear that covers their ankles and has a defined heel. Employees working on bridges are required to wear safety -toed footwear that conforms to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and FRA footwear requirements. B. Employees shall not wear boots (other than work boots), sandals, canvas -type shoes, or other shoes that have thin soles or heels that are higher than normal. C. Employees must not wear loose or ragged clothing, neckties, finger rings, or other loose jewelry while operating or working on machinery. II. Personal Protective Equipment Licensee shall require its employee to wear personal protective equipment as specified by Railroad rules, regulations, or recommended or requested by the Railroad Representative. (i) Hard hat that meets the American National Standard (ANSI) Z89.1 — latest revision. Hard hats should be affixed with Licensee's company logo or name. (ii) Eye protection that meets American National Standard (ANSI) for occupational and educational eye and face protection, Z87.1 — latest revision. Additional eye protection must be provided to meet specific job situations such as welding, grinding, etc. (iii) Hearing protection, which affords enough attenuation to give protection from noise levels that will be occurring on the job site. Hearing protection, in the form of plugs or muffs, must be worn when employees are within: 100 feet of a locomotive or roadway/work equipment 357 15 feet of power operated tools 150 feet of jet blowers or pile drivers 150 feet of retarders in use (when within 10 feet, employees must wear dual ear protection — plugs and muffs) Other types of personal protective equipment, such as respirators, fall protection equipment, and face shields, must be worn as recommended or requested by the Railroad Representative. III. On Track Safety Licensee and its contractor are responsible for compliance with the Federal Railroad Administration's Roadway Worker Protection regulations — 49CFR214, Subpart C and Railroad's On -Track Safety rules. Under 49CFR214, Subpart C, railroad contractors are responsible for the training of their employees on such regulations. In addition to the instructions contained in Roadway Worker Protection regulations, all employees must: (i) Maintain a minimum distance of at least twenty-five (25) feet to any track unless the Railroad Representative is present to authorize movements. Wear an orange, reflectorized work wear approved by the Railroad Representative. Participate in a job briefing that will specify the type of On -Track Safety for the type of work being performed. Licensee must take special note of limits of track authority, which tracks may or may not be fouled, and clearing the track. Licensee will also receive special instructions relating to the work zone around machines and minimum distances between machines while working or traveling. IV. Equipment A. It is the responsibility of Licensee to ensure that all equipment is in a safe condition to operate. If, in the opinion of the Railroad Representative, any of Licensee's equipment is unsafe for use, Licensee shall remove such equipment from Railroad's property. In addition, Licensee must ensure that the operators of all equipment are properly trained and competent in the safe operation of the equipment. In addition, operators must be: Familiar and comply with Railroad's rules on lockout/tagout of equipment. Trained in and comply with the applicable operating rules if operating any by -rail equipment on -track. Trained in and comply with the applicable air brake rules if operating any equipment that moves rail cars or any other rail bound equipment. B. All self-propelled equipment must be equipped with a first -aid kit, fire extinguisher, and audible back-up warning device. C. Unless otherwise authorized by the Railroad Representative, all equipment must be parked a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from any track. Before leaving any equipment unattended, the operator must stop the engine and properly secure the equipment against movement. D. Cranes must be equipped with three orange cones that will be used to mark the working area of the crane and the minimum clearances to overhead powerlines. 358 V. General Safety Requirements A. Licensee shall ensure that all waste is properly disposed of in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations. B. Licensee shall ensure that all employees participate in and comply with a job briefing conducted by the Railroad Representative, if applicable. During this briefing, the Railroad Representative will specify safe work procedures, (including On -Track Safety) and the potential hazards of the job. If any employee has any questions or concerns about the work, the employee must voice them during the job briefing. Additional job briefings will be conducted during the work as conditions, work procedures, or personnel change. C. All track work performed by Licensee meets the minimum safety requirements established by the Federal Railroad Administration's Track Safety Standards 49CFR213. D. All employees comply with the following safety procedures when working around any railroad track: (i) Always be on the alert for moving equipment. Employees must always expect movement on any track, at any time, in either direction. Do not step or walk on the top of the rail, frog, switches, guard rails, or other track components. In passing around the ends of standing cars, engines, roadway machines or work equipment, leave at least 20 feet between yourself and the end of the equipment. Do not go between pieces of equipment of the opening is less than one car length (50 feet). (iv) Avoid walking or standing on a track unless so authorized by the employee in charge. (v) Before stepping over or crossing tracks, look in both directions first. (vi) Do not sit on, lie under, or cross between cars except as required in the performance of your duties and only when track and equipment have been protected against movement. E. All employees must comply with all federal and state regulations concerning workplace safety. 359 ATTACHMENT 2 EAST CORONA OVERHEAD CONSTRUCTION and MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 08-RIV-015 PM 41.25 BNSF File No. BF10012876 STATE Contract No. 08R204 RCTC Agreement No. 18-31-153-00 E. Porphyry State Br. No. 56-0495R/L U.S. D.O.T. No. 026595H LS 7602 MP22.95 San Bernardino Subdivision This Agreement ("Agreement"), is executed to be effective as of ("Effective Date"), by and between BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation ("BNSF"), the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting through the Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as ("STATE"), and the Riverside County Transportation Commission hereinafter referred to as ("RCTC"), a public entity of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as ("Parties"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, BNSF owns and operates a line of railroad in and through the City of Corona, County of Riverside, State of California, hereinafter referred to as ("Rail Corridor"); and WHEREAS, BNSF's predecessor in interest, The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company and STATE entered into an Agreement dated January 14, 1980; carried in BNSF's records as BNSF Secretary's Contract No. CL-160452, ("Original Agreement") which provided for STATE's construction of the East Corona Overhead, State Br. No. 56- 495R/L, DOT No. 026595H, ("OVERHEAD") over the Rail Corridor; WHEREAS, the Original Agreement was supplemented with a First Supplemental Agreement, dated July 23, 1985, to provide for the construction of the San Diego to Riverside Connector Ramp and the widening of the East Corona Overhead by adding two lanes to accommodate a new San Diego to Los Angeles Connector Ramp; WHEREAS, the Original Agreement was further supplemented with a Second Supplemental Agreement, dated July 23, 1985, to provide for the construction of the Interstate Highway 1-15 Northbound Southbound Overheads as part of the construction of the Route-15/Route-91 interchange. The Interstate Southbound Overhead also carries a Los Angeles to San Diego Connector Ramp; Caltrans review 4.17.18 360 WHEREAS, the Original Agreement was further supplemented with a Third Supplemental Agreement, dated July 23, 1985, to complete the construction of the Route-15/Route-91 interchange by construction of the Riverside to San Diego Connector Ramp; WHEREAS, the Original Agreement was further supplemented with a Fourth Supplemental Agreement, dated July 1, 2014, to provide for the construction of a new overhead bridge to accommodate an Eastbound Route-91 to Southbound Route-15 express lane and a Northbound Route-15 to a Westbound Route-91 express lane; WHEREAS, RCTC has adopted a project to extend the existing tolled express lanes on Route-15 between Cajalco Road and Route-60 ("I-15 Express Lanes Project"); WHEREAS, the 1-15 Express Lanes Project will involve the modification of the existing overhead that crosses the BNSF's Rail Corridor at the East Prado Overhead DOT No. 026532D; WHEREAS, RCTC and STATE desire to proceed with modifying the East Corona Overhead as part of the 1-15 Express Lanes Project by providing for its partial demolition and widening to accommodate the new Express Lanes as part of the 1-15 Express Lanes Project; WHEREAS, RCTC will fund the cost to design and construct the 1-15 Express Lanes Project using a design build contractor ("Contractor"); WHEREAS, this Agreement shall provide for the invoicing of the costs of the railroad work to be performed by BNSF and the reimbursement to BNSF, by RCTC, of such costs in connection with the modification of the East Prado Overhead which is part of the 1-15 Express Lanes Project; WHEREAS, STATE is the owner of State Route 91, Interstate Highway 1-15, and the STATE Highway System; WHEREAS, RCTC and STATE have entered into a Cooperative Agreement No. 08-1625 dated May 31, 2016, permitting RCTC to acquire property on behalf of STATE and to design and construct the 1-15 Express Lanes Project ; WHEREAS, upon completion and acceptance of the 1-15 Express Lanes Project by STATE, STATE will thereafter own and maintain all highway improvements made by RCTC under this Agreement; WHEREAS, pursuant to this Agreement, RCTC will acquire from BNSF a Temporary Construction License; and WHEREAS, pursuant to this Agreement, RCTC will acquire a permanent easement ("Easement"), on behalf of the STATE, as required for the 1-15 Express Lanes Project. Caltrans review 4.17.18 361 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements of the Parties contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 1) SCOPE OF WORK 1. The term "Project" as used herein includes any and all work related to the construction of the proposed East Porphyry Overhead (1-15, East Corona Overhead) State Br. No. 56-495R/L (hereinafter referred to as the "Structure"), more particularly described on the Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein, including, but not limited to, any and all changes to telephone, telegraph, signal and electrical lines and appurtenances, temporary and permanent track work, fencing, grading, alterations to or new construction of drainage facilities, preliminary and construction engineering and contract preparation, right of way acquisition, construction management. Additionally, temporary controls during construction must be in compliance with Section 8A-08, "Temporary Traffic Control Zones" of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices ("MUTCD"), U.S. Department of Transportation. ARTICLE 11) BNSF OBLIGATIONS In consideration of the covenants of RCTC and STATE set forth herein and the faithful performance thereof, BNSF agrees as follows: 1. Upon RCTC payment to BNSF of an administrative fee in the sum of Two Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($2,000), together with the Temporary Construction License Fee in the sum of Three Hundred Sixty Three Thousand Two Hundred Fifty and No/100 Dollars ($363,250), BNSF hereby grants to RCTC, its successors and assigns, upon and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, a temporary non-exclusive license (hereinafter called, "Temporary Construction License") to construct the Project across or upon the portion of BNSF's right-of-way described further on Exhibit A-1, as described further in the Legal Descriptions, Exhibit G and Exhibit G2 and as shown on Parcel Maps Exhibit G1 and G3, attached to this Agreement, excepting and reserving BNSF's rights, and the rights of any others who have obtained, or may obtain, permission or authority from BNSF, to do the following: (a) Operate, maintain, renew and/or relocate any and all existing railroad track or tracks, wires, pipelines and other facilities of like character upon, over or under the surface of said right-of-way for the Rail Corridor; Caltrans review 4.17.18 362 (b) Construct, operate, maintain, renew and/or relocate upon said right-of-way, without limitation, such facilities as the BNSF may from time to time deem appropriate, provided such facilities do not materially interfere with the RCTC's construction of the Project; (c) Otherwise use or operate the right-of-way as BNSF may from time to time deem appropriate, provided such use or operations does not materially interfere with STATE's use of the East Porphyry Overhead; and (d) Require RCTC or its contractor to execute a Temporary Construction Crossing Agreement, for any temporary crossing requested to aid in the construction of this Project. The term of the Temporary Construction License shall begin on the Notice to Commence Construction date as set forth hereinafter in Article III, Section 15 and ends on the earlier of (i) substantial completion of the Project, or (ii) Eighteen (18) months following the Notice to Commence Construction. The Temporary Construction License and related rights to be given by BNSF to RCTC shall be without warranty of title of any kind, express or implied, and no covenant of warranty of title will be implied from the use of any word or words therein contained. The Temporary Construction License shall be for the construction of the Project and for no other purpose. In the event STATE or RCTC is evicted by anyone owning, or claiming title to or any interest in said Rail Corridor, BNSF will not be liable to STATE or RCTC for any damages, losses or any expenses of any nature whatsoever. BNSF shall not grant similar rights to others, subsequent to the date of this Agreement, that impair or interfere with the rights granted to RCTC pursuant to the Temporary Construction License. Upon RCTC payment to BNSF of the additional sum of Ninety Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty and No/100 Dollars ($96,750), such payment to be made within thirty (30) days of issuing the Notice to Proceed pursuant to Article III, Section 16 of this Agreement, and provided further that RCTC is in compliance with the term and conditions of this Agreement, BNSF will grant to State, its successors and assigns, an easement (hereinafter called, the "Easement") to enter upon and use that portion of BNSF's right- of-way as is necessary to use and maintain the Structure, substantially in the form of Exhibit B attached to this Agreement. If RCTC fails to pay BNSF within the thirty day time period set forth in the preceding sentence, BNSF may stop construction of the Project until full payment is received by BNSF. 2. BNSF will furnish all labor, materials, tools, and equipment for railroad work required for the construction of the Project, such railroad work and the estimated cost thereof being as shown on Exhibit D attached hereto and made a part hereof. In the event construction on the Project has not commenced within six (6) months following the Caltrans review 4.17.18 363 Effective Date, BNSF may, in its sole and absolute discretion, revise the cost estimates set forth in said Exhibit D. In such event, the revised cost estimates will become a part of this Agreement as though originally set forth herein. Any item of work incidental to the items listed on Exhibit D not specifically mentioned therein may be included as a part of this Agreement upon written approval of RCTC, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. Construction of the Project must include the following railroad work by BNSF: a) Procurement of materials, equipment and supplies necessary for the railroad work; b) Preliminary engineering, design, and contract preparation; (c) Furnishing of flagging services during construction of the Project as required and set forth in further detail on Exhibit C; (d) Furnishing engineering and inspection as required in connection with the construction of the Project; (e) Providing a contract project coordinator, at RCTC's expense, to serve as a project manager for the Project; 3. BNSF will do all railroad work set forth in Article II, Section 2 above on an actual cost basis, when BNSF, in its sole discretion, determines it is required by its labor agreements to perform such work with its own employees working under applicable collective bargaining agreements. 4. RCTC agrees to reimburse BNSF for work of an emergency nature caused by RCTC or RCTC's contractor in connection with the Project which BNSF deems is reasonably necessary for the immediate restoration of railroad operations, or for the protection of persons or BNSF property. Such work may be performed by BNSF with notification provided to RCTC as soon as practicable and RCTC agrees to fully reimburse BNSF for all such emergency work. 5. BNSF may charge RCTC for insurance expenses, including self-insurance expenses, when such expenses cover the cost of Employer's Liability (including, without limitation, liability under the Federal Employer's Liability Act) in connection with the construction of the Project. Such charges will be considered part of the actual cost of the Project, regardless of the nature or amount of ultimate liability for injury, loss or death to BNSF's employees, if any. 6. During the construction of the Project, BNSF will send RCTC progressive invoices detailing the costs of the railroad work performed by BNSF under this Agreement. RCTC must reimburse BNSF for completed force -account work within thirty (30) days of the date of the invoice for such work. Upon completion of the Project, BNSF will send RCTC a Caltrans review 4.17.18 364 detailed invoice of final costs, segregated as to labor and materials for each item in the recapitulation shown on Exhibit D. Pursuant to this section and Article IV, Section 7 herein, RCTC must pay the final invoice within ninety (90) days of the date of the final invoice. BNSF will assess a finance charge of .033% per day (12% per annum) on any unpaid sums or other charges due under this Agreement which are past its credit terms. The finance charge continues to accrue daily until the date payment is received by BNSF, not the date payment is made or the date postmarked on the payment. Finance charges will be assessed on delinquent sums and other charges as of the end of the month and will be reduced by amounts in dispute and any unposted payments received by the month's end. Finance charges will be noted on invoices sent to RCTC under this section. For purposes of computing the time limits prescribed by Section 911.2 of the California Government Code for the presentment of a claim against the RCTC the cause of action for failure to reimburse BNSF for the costs of the Railroad work performed by it pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed to have accrued one hundred and eighty (180) days of the date of the final invoice. ARTICLE III) RCTC OBLIGATIONS In consideration of the covenants of STATE and BNSF set forth herein and the faithful performance thereof, RCTC agrees as follows: 1. RCTC must furnish to BNSF and STATE plans and specifications for the Project. Four sets of said plans (reduced size 11" x 17"), together with two copies of calculations, and two copies of specifications in English Units, must be submitted to BNSF for approval prior to commencement of any construction. BNSF will give RCTC final written approval of the plans and specifications substantially in the form of Exhibit E, attached to this Agreement and made a part hereof. Upon BNSF's final written approval of the plans and specifications, said plans and specifications will become part of this Agreement and are hereby incorporated herein. Any approval of the plans and specifications by BNSF shall in no way obligate BNSF in any manner with respect to the finished product design and/or construction. Any approval by BNSF shall mean only that the plans and specifications meet the subjective standards of BNSF, and such approval by BNSF shall not be deemed to mean that the plans and specifications or construction is structurally sound and appropriate or that such plans and specifications meet applicable regulations, laws, statutes or local ordinances and/or building codes. 2. RCTC must make application to the California Public Utility Commission ("Commission") for an order authorizing construction of the Project and will furnish the Commission plans of the proposed construction, approved by BNSF, together with a copy of this Agreement. 3. RCTC must obtain all other required permits and approvals for the construction of the project. Caltrans review 4.17.18 365 4. RCTC must provide for and maintain minimum vertical and horizontal clearances, as required in Exhibit C and as approved by BNSF as part of the plans and specifications for the Project. Prior to execution of this Agreement RCTC shall have provided to BNSF exact minimum vertical and horizontal clearances for the Project, and such Final Clearances must have been previously approved by BNSF and attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A ("Final Clearances"). RCTC shall not deviate from the Final Clearances agreed to prior to this Agreement without the prior written approval of BNSF. 5. RCTC must acquire all rights of way necessary for the construction of the Project. 6. RCTC must make any and all arrangements, in compliance with BNSF's Utility Accommodation Manual (http://www.bnsf.com/communities/fags/pdf/utility.pdf), for the installation or relocation of wire lines, pipe lines and other facilities owned by private persons, companies, corporations, political subdivisions or public utilities other than BNSF which may be necessary for the construction of the Project.. 7. RCTC must construct the Project as shown on the attached Exhibit A and do all work ("RCTC's Work") provided for in the plans and specifications for the Project, except railroad work that will be performed by BNSF hereunder. RCTC must furnish all labor, materials, tools and equipment for the performance of RCTC Work. The principal elements of RCTC Work are as follows: (a) Preliminary and final Engineering; (b) Design and the construction of the OVERHEAD; (c) Construction of required retaining walls; (d) Repairing the scouring of the head of banks by storm water runoff from the highway surface above at the south abutment for the existing structure and installation of slope paving; (e) Providing of suitable drainage, both temporary and permanent, and correct the drainage that is currently flowing to BNSF's property so that no highway drainage is directed to BNSF's Rail Corridor; (f) All other necessary grading and paving, including backfill of excavations and restoration of disturbed vegetation on BNSF's Rail Corridor; (g) Application of the DOT No. 026595H and the CPUC No. 00213-22.90-A in conspicuous locations on the EXPRESS LANE OVERHEAD; (h) Removal of the sleeves for any CID Piles to a depth of five feet below ground surface; and Caltrans review 4.17.18 366 (i) Job site cleanup within Project area including removal of all construction materials, all temporary track embankment not being reused by BNSF, all ballast not reclaimed by BNSF, concrete debris, surplus soil, refuse, disturbed contaminated soils, asphalt debris, litter and other waste materials to the satisfaction of BNSF 8. RCTC must apply and maintain said D.O.T. Crossing number 026595H, and the Public Utility Commission Crossing number 002B-22.90-A in a conspicuous location on the Structure. 9. RCTC's Work must be performed by RCTC or RCTC's contractor in a manner that will not endanger or interfere with the safe and timely operations of BNSF and its facilities. 10. For any future inspection or maintenance, either routine or otherwise, performed by subcontractors on behalf of the RCTC, RCTC shall require the subcontractors to comply with the provisions of the attached Exhibit C and execute the agreement attached hereto as Exhibit C-1. Prior to performing any future maintenance with its own personnel, RCTC shall: comply with all of BNSF's applicable safety rules and regulations; require any RCTC employee performing maintenance to complete the safety training program at the BNSF's Internet Website "www.BNSFContractor.com"; notify BNSF when, pursuant to the requirements of Exhibit C, a flagger is required to be present; procure, and have approved by BNSF's Risk Management Department, Railroad Protective Liability insurance. 11. RCTC must require its contractor(s) to notify BNSF's Roadmaster at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to requesting a BNSF flagman in accordance with the requirements of Exhibit C attached hereto. Additionally, RCTC must require its contractor(s) to notify BNSF's Manager of Public Projects thirty (30) calendar days prior to commencing work on BNSF property or near BNSF tracks. 12. RCTC or its contractor(s) must submit four (4) copies of any plans (including two sets of calculations in English Units) for proposed shoring, falsework or cribbing to be used over, under, or adjacent to BNSF's tracks to BNSF's Manager of Public Projects for approval. The shoring, falsework or cribbing used by RCTC contractor shall comply with the BNSF Bridge Requirements set forth on Exhibit F and all applicable requirements promulgated by state and federal agencies, departments, commissions and other legislative bodies. If necessary, RCTC must submit for approval two (2) copies of a professionally engineered demolition plan, as set forth in Exhibit H, with applicable calculations to BNSF's Manager of Public Projects. The existing Overpass will not be removed until BNSF approves RCTC's demolition plan in writing. Caltrans review 4.17.18 367 13. RCTC must include the following provisions in any contract with its contractor(s) performing work on said Project: (a) The Provider is placed on notice that fiber optic, communication and other cable lines and systems (collectively, the "Lines") owned by various telecommunications companies may be buried on BNSF's property or right-of-way. The locations of these Lines have been included on the plans based on information from the telecommunications companies. The Provider will be responsible for contacting BNSF's Engineering Representative, Signal Representative and the telecommunications companies and notifying them of any work that may damage these Lines or facilities and/or interfere with their service. The Provider must also mark all Lines shown on the plans or marked in the field in order to verify their locations. The Provider must also use all reasonable methods when working in the BNSF right-of-way or on BNSF property to determine if any other Lines (fiber optic, cable, communication or otherwise) may exist. (b) The Provider will be responsible for the rearrangement of any facilities or Lines determined to interfere with the construction. The Provider must cooperate fully with any telecommunications company(ies) in performing such rearrangements. (c) Failure to mark or identify these Lines will be sufficient cause for BNSF's engineering representative to stop construction at no cost to the RCTC or BNSF until these items are completed. (d) In addition to the liability terms contained elsewhere in this Agreement, the Provider hereby indemnifies, defends and holds harmless BNSF for, from and against all cost, liability, and expense whatsoever (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and court costs and expenses) arising out of or in any way contributed to by any act or omission of Provider, its subcontractors, agents and/or employees that cause or in any way or degree contribute to (1) any damage to or destruction of any Lines by Provider, and/or its subcontractors, agents and/or employees, on BNSF's property or within BNSF's right-of-way, (2) any injury to or death of any person employed by or on behalf of any telecommunications company, and/or its contractor, agents and/or employees, on BNSF's property or within BNSF's right-of-way, and/or (3) any claim or cause of action for alleged loss of profits or revenue by, or loss of service by a customer or user of such telecommunication company(ies). THE LIABILITY ASSUMED BY PROVIDER WILL NOT BE AFFECTED BY THE FACT, IF IT IS A FACT, THAT THE DAMAGE, DESTRUCTION, INJURY, DEATH, CAUSE OF ACTION OR CLAIM WAS OCCASIONED BY OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY THE NEGLIGENCE OF BNSF, ITS AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES OR OTHERWISE, Caltrans review 4.17.18 EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SUCH CLAIMS ARE PROXIMATELY CAUSED BY THE WILLFUL MISCONDUCT OR SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF BNSF. 14. RCTC must require compliance with the obligations set forth in this agreement, including Exhibit C and Exhibit C-1, and incorporate in each prime contract for construction of the Project, or the specifications therefor (i) the provisions set forth in Article III and IV; and (ii) the provisions set forth in Exhibit C, Exhibit C-I, and Exhibit F attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. 15. Except as otherwise provided below in this Section 13, all construction work performed hereunder by RCTC for the Project will be pursuant to a contract or contracts to be let by RCTC, and all such contracts must include the following: (a) All work performed under such contract or contracts within the limits of BNSF's right-of-way must be performed in a good and workmanlike manner in accordance with plans and specifications approved by BNSF; (b) Changes or modifications during construction that affect safety or BNSF operations must be subject to BNSF's approval; (c) No work will be commenced within BNSF's right-of-way until each of the prime contractors employed in connection with said work must have (i) executed and delivered to BNSF an agreement in the form of Exhibit C-I, and (ii) delivered to and secured BNSF's approval of the required insurance; and (d) To facilitate scheduling for the Project, RCTC shall have its contractor give BNSF's representative 8 weeks advance notice of the proposed times and dates for work windows. BNSF and RCTC contractor will establish mutually agreeable work windows for the Project. BNSF has the right at any time to revise or change the work windows, due to train operations or service obligations. BNSF will not be responsible for any additional costs and expenses resulting from a change in work windows. Additional costs and expenses resulting from a change in work windows shall be accounted for in the contractor's expenses for the Project. (e) The plans and specifications for the Project must be in compliance with the Bridge Requirements set forth on Exhibit F, attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein. 16. RCTC must advise the appropriate BNSF Manager of Public Projects, in writing, of the completion date of the Project within thirty (30) days after such completion date. Caltrans review 4.17.18 369 Additionally, RCTC must notify BNSF's Manager of Public Projects, in writing, of the date on which RCTC and/or its Contractor will meet with BNSF for the purpose of making final inspection of the Project. 17. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, RCTC HEREBY RELEASES, INDEMNIFIES, DEFENDS AND HOLDS HARMLESS BNSF, ITS AFFILIATED COMPANIES, PARTNERS, SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS, LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, SHAREHOLDERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS FOR, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, LIABILITIES, FINES, PENALTIES, COSTS, DAMAGES, LOSSES, LIENS, CAUSES OF ACTION, SUITS, DEMANDS, JUDGMENTS AND EXPENSES (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, COURT COSTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES) OF ANY NATURE, KIND OR DESCRIPTION OF ANY PERSON (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE EMPLOYEES OF THE PARTIES HERETO) OR ENTITY DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF, RESULTING FROM OR RELATED TO (IN WHOLE OR IN PART) (1) THE USE, OCCUPANCY OR PRESENCE OF RCTC, ITS CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS IN, ON, OR ABOUT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, (11) THE PERFORMANCE, OR FAILURE TO PERFORM BY THE RCTC, ITS CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, EMPLOYEES, OR AGENTS, ITS WORK OR ANY OBLIGATION UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, (III) THE SOLE OR CONTRIBUTING ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF RCTC, ITS CONTRACTORS, SUBCONTRACTORS, EMPLOYEES, OR AGENTS IN, ON, OR ABOUT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, (IV) RCTC'S BREACH OF THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION LICENSE OR EASEMENT GRANTED TO RCTC PURSUANT TO ARTICLE II OF THIS AGREEMENT, (V) ANY RIGHTS OR INTERESTS GRANTED TO RCTC PURSUANT TO THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION LICENSE OR EASEMENT DISCUSSED IN ARTICLE II OF THIS AGREEMENT, (VI) RCTC'S OCCUPATION AND USE OF BNSF'S PROPERTY OR RIGHT-OF-WAY, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SUBSEQUENT MAINTENANCE OF THE STRUCTURE BY RCTC, OR (VII) AN ACT OR OMISSION OF RCTC OR ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS, INVITEES, EMPLOYEES OR CONTRACTORS OR ANYONE DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY EMPLOYED BY ANY OF THEM, OR ANYONE THEY CONTROL OR EXERCISE CONTROL OVER. THE LIABILITY ASSUMED BY RCTC WILL NOT BE AFFECTED BY THE FACT, IF IT IS A FACT, THAT THE DAMAGE, DESTRUCTION, INJURY OR DEATH WAS OCCASIONED BY OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY THE NEGLIGENCE OF BNSF, ITS AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES OR OTHERWISE, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SUCH CLAIMS ARE PROXIMATELY CAUSED BY THE WILLFUL MISCONDUCT OR SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF BNSF. Caltrans review 4.17.18 370 17. RCTC must give BNSF's Manager of Public Projects written notice to proceed ("Notice to Proceed") with the railroad work after receipt of necessary funds for the Project. BNSF will not begin the railroad work (including, without limitation, procurement of supplies, equipment or materials) until written notice to proceed is received from RCTC. ARTICLE IV - STATE OBLIGATIONS In consideration of the covenants of BNSF and RCTC herein contained and the faithful performance thereof, STATE agrees: 1. To permit RCTC to act as the responsible lead RCTC to design and construct the Project. 2. In addition to the terms and conditions set forth elsewhere in this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the terms and conditions stated in Exhibit F, BNSF and STATE agree to the following terms upon completion of construction of the Project: (a) BNSF will own and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, its roadbed, track, railroad drainage, and all other railroad facilities, however, nothing herein contained shall relieve STATE of any liability it would otherwise have with respect to damage caused to the STRUCTURE by negligent act or omission of STATE or its employees; (b) STATE will own and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, the STRUCTURE, the highway approaches, and appurtenances thereto, lighting, drainage and any access roadway to BNSF gates installed pursuant to this Agreement. BNSF may perform maintenance on the STRUCTURE in order to avoid conflicts with train operation. BNSF will notify STATE for concurrence prior to performing any such maintenance on the STRUCTURE. In the event such maintenance involves emergency repairs due to an earthquake, fire, flood, damage from vehicular impacts or other emergent situations, BNSF will immediately notify STATE of items in need of repair that are under STATE's responsibility. If the STATE does not complete the repairs that have been mutually agreed to within a time period mutually agreed to as reasonable under the circumstances, BNSF personnel and/or providers may perform the repairs and invoice the STATE for the entire cost of such repairs. Notwithstanding the foregoing, BNSF may remove any materials that infringe upon or violate the minimum clearances described in Exhibit C by methods that would not cause damage to the structural integrity of the bridge without prior notice to, or concurrence by, STATE. STATE agrees to reimburse BNSF for the costs it incurs pursuant to this subsection (b). Caltrans review 4.17.18 371 (c) STATE must, at STATE's sole cost and expense, keep the STRUCTURE painted and free from graffiti; (d) STATE must maintain the DOT No. 026595H and CPUC No. 002B-22.90-A in legible condition in the conspicuous locations on the STRUCTURE where applied by RCTC during construction; (e) It is understood by STATE that the right to install utilities is restricted to the placement of underground utilities beneath BNSF's tracks located a minimum of fifty (50) feet from abutments, piers, piles, or footings with the exception that upon BNSF's prior approval BNSF will permit selected utilities to be installed closer to the abutments, piers, piles, footings and/or run through the deck of the STRUCTURE. Under no circumstances will utilities be allowed to hang from the STRUCTURE. All utility crossings within the limits of BNSF's Rail Corridor will be covered by separate agreements between BNSF and each of the owners of the utilities; (f) STATE must keep the STRUCTURE and surrounding areas clean and free from birds, pigeons, scavengers, vermin, creatures and other animals; and (g) In conformance with and limited to the applicable effect of California Laws insofar as the indemnity and insurance provisions set forth in any of the preceding sections or any rider, amendment or addendum hereto, STATE is self -insured. If STATE performs (i) alterations or modifications to the STRUCTURE, or (ii) any maintenance or other work on the STRUCTURE with heavy tools, equipment or machinery at ground surface level, horizontally within 25-0" of the centerline of the nearest track, or (iii) any maintenance or other work outside the limits of the deck of the STRUCTURE vertically above the top of the rail, then STATE shall provide BNSF defense and indemnification at least equal to the defense, indemnification and insurance provisions contained in the current Exhibit C-1 at the time alterations or modifications to the STRUCTURE are undertaken, in accordance with California Government Code section 14662.5. Nothing herein shall be deemed to insure BNSF against its sole negligence or willful misconduct. Notwithstanding the foregoing, STATE agrees not to commence such alterations, modifications, maintenance, or other work to the STRUCTURE with day labor, until such time as (i) BNSF has procured, at STATE's sole cost and expense, a Railroad Protective Liability insurance policy naming BNSF as the insured, as required by the current Exhibit C-1, and (ii) STATE has reimbursed BNSF for the costs to obtain the Railroad Protective Liability insurance policy. 3. Subject to the restrictions imposed by Article V, Section 11 below, STATE must notify and obtain prior authorization from BNSF's Manager Public Projects to Caltrans review 4.17.18 372 perform (i) inspection, (ii) alterations or modifications to the STRUCTURE, or (iii) any maintenance or other work on, over or under the STRUCTURE before entering BNSF's Rail Corridor or for work located a minimum distance of 25'-0" measured horizontally from the centerline of the nearest track or a greater distance specified by BNSF's Manager Public Projects and must procure and maintain the insurance coverage required by Exhibit C-1 and comply with the obligations set forth in Exhibit C and Exhibit F, as the same may be revised from time to time. In the event any of the work to be done on behalf of STATE upon BNSF's Rail Corridor is to be done by a contractor, STATE will be responsible for its contractor(s) compliance with such obligations. 4. PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 14662.5, STATE HEREBY AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS BNSF FROM, AND TO REPAIR OR PAY FOR ANY DAMAGE PROXIMATELY CAUSED BY REASON OF THE USES AUTHORIZED BY THIS AGREEMENT AND THE EASEMENTS PERTAINING TO THE STRUCTURE. ARTICLE (V) JOINT OBLIGATIONS IN CONSIDERATION of the premises, the parties hereto mutually agree to the following: 1. All work contemplated in this Agreement must be performed in a good and workmanlike manner and each portion must be promptly commenced by the party obligated hereunder to perform the same and thereafter diligently prosecuted to conclusion in its logical order and sequence. Furthermore, any changes or modifications during construction which affect BNSF will be subject to BNSF's approval prior to the commencement of any such changes or modifications. BNSF will notify RCTC of potential impacts to Project at the time said impacts are known, subject to the provisions of Article II, Section 5. 2. The work hereunder must be done in accordance with the Bridge Requirements set forth on Exhibit F and the detailed plans and specifications approved by BNSF. 3. RCTC must require its contractor(s) to reasonably adhere to the Project's construction schedule for all Project work. The parties hereto mutually agree that BNSF's failure to complete the railroad work in accordance with the construction schedule due to inclement weather or unforeseen railroad emergencies will not constitute a breach of this Agreement by BNSF and will not subject BNSF to any liability. Regardless of the requirements of the construction schedule, BNSF reserves the right to reallocate the labor forces assigned to complete the railroad work in the event of an emergency to provide for the immediate restoration of railroad operations of either (BNSF or its related railroads) or to protect persons or property on or near any BNSF owned property. BNSF will not be Caltrans review 4.17.18 373 liable for any additional costs or expenses resulting from any such reallocation of its labor forces. The parties mutually agree that any reallocation of labor forces by BNSF pursuant to this provision and any direct or indirect consequences or costs resulting from any such reallocation will not constitute a breach of this Agreement by BNSF. 4. BNSF will have the right to stop construction work on the Project if any of the following events take place: (i) RCTC (or any of its contractors) performs the Project work in a manner contrary to the plans and specifications approved by BNSF; (ii) RCTC (or any of its contractors), in BNSF's opinion, prosecutes the Project work in a manner that is hazardous to BNSF property, facilities or the safe and expeditious movement of railroad traffic; (iii) the insurance described in the attached Exhibit C-1 is canceled during the course of the Project; or (iv) RCTC fails to pay BNSF for the Temporary Construction License or the Easement pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of this Agreement. The work stoppage will continue until all necessary actions are taken by RCTC or its contractor to rectify the situation to the satisfaction of BNSF's Division Engineer or until proof of additional insurance has been delivered to and accepted by BNSF. In the event of a breach of (i) this Agreement, (ii) the Temporary Construction License, or (iii) the Easement, BNSF may immediately terminate the Temporary Construction License or the Easement. Any such work stoppage under this provision will not give rise to any liability on the part of BNSF. BNSF's right to stop the work is in addition to any other rights BNSF may have including, but not limited to, actions or suits for damages or lost profits. In the event that BNSF desires to stop construction work on the Project, BNSF agrees to immediately notify the following individual in writing: Michael Blomquist Toll Program Director RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 480 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Office: (951) 778-1098 Fax (951) 787-7920 mblomguist(a-)_rctc.org 5. RCTC must supervise and inspect the operations of all RCTC contractors to ensure compliance with the plans and specifications approved by BNSF, the terms of this Agreement and all safety requirements of BNSF. If BNSF determines that proper supervision and inspection are not being performed by RCTC personnel at any time during construction of the Project, BNSF has the right to stop construction (within or adjacent to its operating right-of-way). Construction of the Project will not proceed until RCTC corrects the situation to BNSF's reasonable satisfaction. If BNSF feels the situation Caltrans review 4.17.18 374 is not being corrected in an expeditious manner, BNSF will immediately notify for appropriate corrective action. 6. Pursuant to this section and Article II, Section 6 herein, RCTC must reimburse BNSF in full for the actual costs of all work performed by BNSF under this Agreement (including taxes, such as applicable sales and use taxes, business and occupation taxes, and similar taxes), less BNSF's Share as set forth in Article IV, Section 6 herein. BNSF's Share must be paid upon completion of the Project. 7. In any action brought under this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover its actual costs and attorneys fees pursuant to California Civil Code Section 1717, as well as other litigation costs, including expert witness fees. The prevailing Party shall also be entitled to recover all actual attorneys' fees and litigation costs incurred in connection with the enforcement of a judgment arising from such action or proceeding. 8. All expenses detailed in statements sent to RCTC pursuant to Article Il, Section 6 herein will comply with the terms and provisions of the Title 23 U.S. Code, Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations, and the Federal -Aid Policy Guide, U.S. Department of Transportation, as amended from time to time, which manual is hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement by reference. The parties mutually agree that BNSF's preliminary engineering, design, and contract preparation costs described in Article ll, Section 2 herein are part of the costs of the Project even though such work may have preceded the date of this Agreement. 9. The parties mutually agree that neither construction activities for the Project, nor future maintenance of the Structure once completed, will be permitted during the fourth quarter of each calendar year. Emergency work will be permitted only upon prior notification to BNSF's Network Operations Center (telephone number: 800 832-5452). The parties hereto mutually understand and agree that trains cannot be subjected to delay during this time period. 10. Subject to the restrictions imposed by Article IV, Section 9 above, the construction of the Project will not commence until RCTC gives BNSF's Manager of Public Projects thirty (30) days prior written notice of such commencement. The commencement notice will reference D.O.T. Crossing No. 026595H and must state the time that construction activities will begin. 11. In addition to the terms and conditions set forth elsewhere in this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the terms and conditions stated in Exhibit F, BNSF and RCTC agree to the following terms upon completion of construction of the Project: (a) State will own and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, the Structure, the highway approaches, and appurtenances thereto, lighting, drainage and any access roadways to structure. BNSF may, at its option, perform maintenance on the Structure in order to avoid conflicts with train operations. BNSF will notify RCTC prior to performing any such maintenance on the Structure. In the event such maintenance involves emergency repairs, BNSF will notify RCTC at its earliest opportunity. RCTC must fully reimburse BNSF for the costs of maintenance performed by BNSF pursuant to this subsection. Caltrans review 4.17.18 375 (b) State must, at State's sole cost and expense, keep the Structure painted and free from graffiti. (c) State must provide BNSF with any and all necessary permits and maintain roadway traffic controls, at no cost to BNSF, whenever requested by BNSF to allow BNSF to inspect the Structure or to make emergency repairs thereto. (d) It is expressly understood by RCTC, State and BNSF that any right to install utilities will be governed by a separate permit or license agreement between the parties hereto. (e) State must keep the Structure and surrounding areas clean and free from birds, pigeons, scavengers, vermin, creatures and other animals. (f) If RCTC (including its contractors and agents) or BNSF, on behalf of RCTC, performs (i) alterations or modifications to the Structure, or (ii) any maintenance or other work on the Structure with heavy tools, equipment or machinery at ground surface level horizontally within 25-0" of the centerline of the nearest track, or (iii) any maintenance or other work outside the limits of the deck of the Structure vertically above the top of the rail, then RCTC or its contractors and/or agents must procure and maintain the following insurance coverage, which may be changed from time to time: Railroad Protective Liability insurance naming only BNSF as the Insured with coverage of at least $5,000,000 per occurrence and $10,000,000 in the aggregate. The policy shall be issued on a standard ISO form CG 00 35 12 04 and include the following: • Endorsed to include the Pollution Exclusion Amendment • Endorsed to include the Limited Seepage and Pollution Endorsement. • Endorsed to remove any exclusion for punitive damages. • Endorsed to include Evacuation Expense Coverage Endorsement. • No other endorsements restricting coverage may be added. • The original policy must be provided to BNSF prior to performing any work or services under this Agreement • Definition of "Physical Damage to Property" shall be endorsed to read: "means direct and accidental loss of or damage to all property owned by any named insured and all property in any named insured' care, custody, and control arising out of the acts or omissions of the contractor named on the Declarations. Caltrans review 4.17.18 376 As used in this paragraph, "BNSF" means "Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLU, "BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY" and the subsidiaries, successors, assigns and affiliates of each. In lieu of providing a Railroad Protective Liability Policy, RCTC may participate in BNSF's Blanket Railroad Protective Liability Insurance Policy if available to RCTC or its contractors. The limits of coverage are the same as above. 12. RCTC hereby grants to BNSF, at no cost or expense to BNSF, a permanent right of access from RCTC property to BNSF tracks for maintenance purposes. 13. RCTC must provide one set of as built plans (prepared in English Units) to BNSF, as well as one set of computer diskettes containing as built CAD drawings of the Structure and identifying the software used for the CAD drawings. The "as built plans" must comply with the Bridge Requirements set forth on Exhibit F and depict all information in BNSF engineering stationing and mile post pluses. The "as built plans" must also include plan and profile, structural bridge drawings and specifications, and drainage plans. All improvements and facilities must be shown. 14. Subject to the restrictions imposed by Article IV, Section 9 above and in accordance with the requirements of Article III, Section 9 above, RCTC must notify and obtain prior authorization from BNSF's Manager of Public Projects before entering BNSF's right-of-way for INSPECTION OR MAINTENANCE purposes, and the BNSF Manager of Public Projects will determine if flagging is required. If the construction work hereunder is contracted, RCTC must require its prime contractor(s) to comply with the obligations set forth in Exhibit C and Exhibit C-1, as the same may be revised from time to time. RCTC will be responsible for its contractor(s) compliance with such obligations. 15. In the event that BNSF shall deem it necessary or desirable in the future, in the performance of its duty as a common carrier, to raise or lower the grade or change the alignment of its tracks or to lay additional track or tracks or to build other facilities in connection with the operation of its railroad, BNSF shall, at its expense, have full right to make such changes or additions, provided such changes or additions do not change or alter the Structure herein proposed to be constructed and provided further, however, that should it become necessary or desirable in the future to change, alter, widen or reconstruct the Structure to accommodate railroad projects, the cost of such work, including any cost incidental to alteration of railroad or highway facilities made necessary by the alteration of the Structure shall be the sole responsibility of RCTC. 16. State may, at RCTC's sole expense, alter or reconstruct the highway components of the Structure if necessary or desirable, due to traffic conditions or pedestrian or other recreational traffic, provided, however, that any such alteration or reconstruction must receive BNSF's prior written approval as evidenced by either a supplement to this Agreement, or execution of a new agreement that provides for the termination of this Agreement. Furthermore, any alteration or reconstruction of the highway components of the Structure will be covered by a Commission Order. Caltrans review 4.17.18 377 17. Any books, papers, records and accounts of the parties hereto relating to the work hereunder or the costs or expenses for labor and material connected with the construction will at all reasonable times be open to inspection and audit by the agents and authorized representatives of the parties hereto, as well as the State of California and the Federal Highway Administration, for a period of one (1) year from the date of the final BNSF invoice under this Agreement. 18. The covenants and provisions of this Agreement are binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, neither party hereto may assign any of its rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other party. 19. In the event construction of the Project does not commence within (3) years of the Effective Date, this Agreement will become null and void. 20. Neither termination nor expiration of this Agreement will release either party from any liability or obligation under this Agreement, whether of indemnity or otherwise, resulting from any acts, omissions or events happening prior to the date of termination or expiration. 21. To the maximum extent possible, each provision of this Agreement will be interpreted in such a manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law. If any provision of this Agreement is prohibited by, or held to be invalid under, applicable law, such provision will be ineffective solely to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity and the remainder of the provision will be enforceable. 22. This Agreement (including exhibits and other documents, manuals, etc. incorporated herein) is the full and complete agreement between BNSF and RCTC with respect to the subject matter herein and supersedes any and all other prior agreements between the parties hereto. 23. Any notice provided for herein or concerning this Agreement must be in writing and will be deemed sufficiently given when sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the parties at the following addresses: BNSF: Manager of Public Projects Tiera Adams 740 E. Carnegie Drive San Bernardinio, CA 92408 Email: Tiera.Adams(a-_)bnsf.com Caltrans review 4.17.18 378 RCTC: Michael Blomquist Toll Program Director 480 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Office: (951) 778-1098 Fax (951) 787-7920 Email: mblomguist(q)_rctc.org STATE: Department of Transportation Tiaira T. Moering, Chief Office of Railroads and Utilities Relocation Caltrans review 4.17.18 Division of Right of Way & Land Surveys 1120 N Street Sacramento, CA 95814-5690 Office: (916) 654-6553 Email: tiaira.moerinq Cc�dot.ca.gov 379 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and attested by its duly qualified and authorized officials as of the day and year first above written. Caltrans review 4.17.18 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY By: Printed Name: Title: WITNESS: RCTC By: Printed Name: Title: WITNESS: STATE By: Printed Name: Title: WITNESS: 011 Caltrans review 4.17.18 Exhibit A & Al [Insert drawing of the Project and/or Structure] 381 Caltrans review 4.17.18 Exhibit B Easement Deed yv 382 I&M EASEMENT DEED (C&M Agreement) THIS EASEMENT FOR Highway Purposes ("Easement") is made and entered into as of the day of 20_ ("Effective Date"), by and between BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation ("Grantor"), and STATE OF CALIFORNIA, through its DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ("Grantee"). A. Grantor owns or controls certain real property situated at or near the vicinity of , County of , State of , at Mile Post [Project # ], as described or depicted on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Premises"). B. Grantor and Grantee have entered into that certain Construction and Maintenance Agreement dated as of concerning improvements on or near the Premises (the "C&M Agreement"). C. GRANTOR agrees to grant to GRANTEE, its successors and assigns an Easement over the Premises for purpose of operating a highway overpass over and above Grantor's property, subject to the reservations, covenants, terms and conditions set forth herein and more fully detailed in the previously referenced C&M Agreement. Grantee requires Easement for State highway purposes, a public use for which Grantee has the authority to exercise the power of eminent domain. Grantor is compelled to sell, and Grantee is compelled to acquire the Easement. In consideration of the foregoing recitals which are incorporated herein, the mutual promises contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: Caltrans review 4.17.18 383 1. Grantor does hereby grant to Grantee an easement for the construction, reconstruction, replacement, removal, inspection, maintenance, repair, and operating an overhead bridge and highway only for use as a public crossing at the location identified herein along with all necessary supporting columns, footings and appurtenances thereon (hereinafter collectively "Structure"). Structure shall be constructed, located, configured and maintained by Grantee, its successors and assigns in strict accordance with the terms of this Easement and the C&M Agreement. Structure and its use as a public crossing in accordance with this easement and the C&M Agreement are compatible with railroad operations, within the meaning of California Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.510 so long as they do not impede railroad operations, create an undue safety risk, or interfere with Grantor's common carrier obligations as regulated by the Surface Transportation Board or by any successor agency. 2. Grantor further grants to Grantee the non-exclusive right of ingress to and egress from the Premises over and across Grantor's other property subject to advance notification and coordination with Grantor to ensure safety and the compatibility of Grantor's other property for such ingress and egress (which coordination by Grantor shall not be unreasonably withheld) and provided further that such right of ingress and egress shall be in accordance with the terms and provisions of the parties' separate C&M Agreement and any amendments thereto. 3. Reservations by Grantor. Grantor reserves, for itself, or to assign to third parties, the right, provided Grantor uses all commercially reasonable efforts to avoid material interference with the use of the Premises by Grantee for the Easement, including but not limited to the following: (a) to install, construct, reconstruct, upgrade, maintain, renew, alter, repair, inspect, replace, use, operate, change, modify and relocate any existing pipe, power, communication, cable, or utility lines and appurtenances and other facilities or structures of like character (collectively, "Lines") upon, over, under or across the Premises; (b) to install, construct, maintain, renew, repair, replace, use, operate, change, modify and relocate any tracks or additional facilities or structures upon, over, under or across the Premises; and (c) to use the Premises in any manner as the Grantor in its sole discretion deems appropriate. 4. No Warranty of Any Conditions of the Premises. Grantee acknowledges that Grantor has made no representation whatsoever to Grantee concerning the state or condition of the Premises, or any personal property located thereon, or the nature or extent of Grantor's ownership interest in the Premises. Grantee has not relied on any statement or declaration of Grantor, oral or in Caltrans review 4.17.18 M writing, as an inducement to entering into this Easement Agreement, other than as set forth herein. GRANTOR HEREBY DISCLAIMS ANY REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY, WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE DESIGN OR CONDITION OF ANY PROPERTY PRESENT ON OR CONSTITUTING THE PREMISES, ITS MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE, THE QUALITY OF THE MATERIAL OR WORKMANSHIP OF ANY SUCH PROPERTY, OR THE CONFORMITY OF ANY SUCH PROPERTY TO ITS INTENDED USES. GRANTOR SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE TO GRANTEE OR ANY OF GRANTEE'S CONTRACTORS FOR ANY DAMAGES RELATING TO THE DESIGN, CONDITION, QUALITY, SAFETY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY PROPERTY PRESENT ON OR CONSTITUTING THE PREMISES, OR THE CONFORMITY OF ANY SUCH PROPERTY TO ITS INTENDED USES. GRANTEE ACCEPTS ALL RIGHTS GRANTED UNDER THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE PREMISES IN AN "AS IS, WHERE IS" AND "WITH ALL FAULTS" CONDITION, AND SUBJECT TO ALL LIMITATIONS ON GRANTOR'S RIGHTS, INTERESTS AND TITLE TO THE PREMISES. Grantee has inspected or will inspect the Premises, and enters upon Grantor's rail corridor and property with knowledge of its physical condition and the danger inherent in Grantor's rail operations on or near the Premises. Grantee acknowledges that this Easement Agreement does not contain any implied warranties that Grantee or Grantee's Contractors (as hereinafter defined) can successfully construct or operate the Improvements. 5. Nature of Grantor's Interest in the Premises. GRANTOR DOES NOT WARRANT ITS TITLE TO THE PREMISES NOR UNDERTAKE TO DEFEND GRANTEE IN THE PEACEABLE POSSESSION OR USE THEREOF. NO COVENANT OF QUIET ENJOYMENT IS MADE. In case of the eviction of Grantee by anyone owning or claiming title to or any interest in the Premises, or by the abandonment by Grantor of the affected rail corridor, Grantor shall not be liable to refund Grantee any compensation paid hereunder. 6. Improvements. Grantee shall take, in a timely manner, all actions necessary and proper to the lawful establishment, construction, operation, and maintenance of the Improvements, including such actions as may be necessary to obtain any required permits, approvals or authorizations from applicable governmental authorities. Any and all cuts and fills, excavations or embankments necessary in the construction, maintenance, or future alteration of the Improvements shall be made and maintained in such manner, form and extent as will provide adequate drainage of and from the adjoining lands and premises of the Grantor; and wherever any such fill or embankment shall or may obstruct the natural and pre-existing drainage from such lands and premises of the Grantor, the Grantee shall construct and maintain such culverts or drains as may be requisite to preserve such natural and pre-existing drainage, and shall also wherever necessary, construct extensions of existing drains, culverts or ditches through or along the premises of the Grantor, such extensions to be of adequate sectional dimensions to preserve the present flowage of drainage or other waters, and of materials and workmanship equally as good as those now existing. In the event any construction, repair, maintenance, work or other use Caltrans review 4.17.18 385 of the Premises by Grantee will affect any Lines, fences, buildings, improvements or other facilities (collectively, "Other Improvements"), Grantee will be responsible at Grantee's sole risk to locate and make any adjustments necessary to such Other Improvements. Grantee or Grantee's contractors or consultants must contact the owner(s) of the Other Improvements notifying them of any work that may damage these Other Improvements and/or interfere with their service and obtain the owner's written approval prior to so affecting the Other Improvements. Grantee or Grantee's contractors or consultants must mark all Other Improvements on the Plans and Specifications and mark such Other Improvements in the field in order to verify their locations. Grantee must also use all reasonable methods when working on or near Grantor property to determine if any Other Improvements (fiber optic, cable, communication or otherwise) may exist. The Grantee agrees to keep the above -described premises free and clear from combustible materials and to cut and remove or cause to be cut and removed at its sole expense all weeds and vegetation on said premises during the construction of the Structure. Said work of cutting and removal to be done at such times and with such frequency as to comply with Grantee and local laws and regulations and abate any and all hazard of fire. 7. Taxes and Recording Fees. Grantee shall pay all applicable escrow and recording fees incurred in this transaction, and if title insurance is desired by Grantee, the premium charged therefor. Any taxes applicable to this transaction shall be cleared and paid in the manner required by Section 5086 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, if unpaid at the close of escrow. 8. Compliance with Environmental Laws. Except where it is exempted, Grantee shall strictly comply with all federal and state environmental Laws in its use of the Premises, including, but not limited to, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended (RCRA), the Clean Water Act, the Oil Pollution Act, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Toxic Substances Control Act (collectively referred to as the "Environmental Laws"). Grantee shall not maintain a "treatment," "storage," "transfer" or "disposal" facility, or "underground storage tank," as those terms are defined by Environmental Laws, on the Premises. Grantee shall not handle, transport, release or suffer the release of "hazardous waste" or "hazardous substances", as "hazardous waste" and "hazardous substances" may now or in the future be defined by any Environmental Laws. 9. Notice of Release. Grantee shall give Grantor immediate notice to Grantor's Resource Operations Center at (800) 832-5452 of any release of hazardous substances on or from the Premises, violation of Environmental Laws, or inspection or inquiry by governmental authorities charged with enforcing Environmental Laws with respect to Grantee's use of the Premises. Grantee shall use its best efforts to promptly respond to any release on or from the Premises. Grantee also shall give Grantor immediate notice of all measures undertaken on behalf of Grantee to investigate, remediate, respond to or otherwise cure such release or violation. Caltrans review 4.17.18 10. Remediation of Release or Violation caused by use of Easement. In the event that Grantor has notice from Grantee or otherwise of a release or violation of Environmental Laws which occurred or may occur during the term of this Easement, and which was caused by, contributed to, or Grantee or Grantee's contractor, Grantor may require Grantee, at Grantee's sole risk and expense, to take timely measures to investigate, remediate, respond to or otherwise cure such release or violation affecting the Premises. If during the construction or subsequent maintenance of the Structure, soils or other materials considered to be environmentally contaminated are exposed, Grantee will remove and safely dispose of said contaminated soils. Determination of soils contamination and applicable disposal procedures thereof, will be made only by an agency having the capacity and authority to make such a determination. 11. Preventative Measures. Grantee shall promptly report to Grantor in writing any conditions or activities upon the Premises known to Grantee which create a risk of harm to persons, property or the environment and shall take whatever action is necessary to prevent injury to persons or property arising out of such conditions or activities; provided, however, that Grantee's reporting to Grantor shall not relieve Grantee of any obligation whatsoever imposed on it by this Easement Agreement. Grantee shall promptly respond to Grantor's request for information regarding said conditions or activities. 12. Vacation. If the Easement or any portion thereof, shall cease to be needed for public crossing purpose, then the Grantee shall vacate such portion(s) of the Easement in accordance with any and all applicable State and Federal Laws. In addition, Grantee at Grantee's sole expense, shall demolish and remove the Structure in accordance with the then current standards of Grantor, including but not limited to engineering, land use and railroad operating standards, and with the terms and provisions of the C&M Agreement. 4 13 Tax Exchange. Grantee may assign its rights but not its obligations under this Easement to effect an exchange under applicable section(s) of the Internal Revenue Code. In such event, Grantor shall provide Grantee with a Notice of Assignment and Grantee shall execute an acknowledgement of receipt of such notice. 14. Notices. Any notice required or permitted to be given hereunder by one party to the other shall be delivered in the manner set forth in the C&M Agreement. Notices to Grantor under this Easement shall be delivered to the following address: BNSF Railway Company, Real Estate Department, 2500 Lou Menk Drive, Ft. Worth, TX 76131, Attn: Permits, or such other address as Grantor may from time to time direct by notice to Grantee. 15. Recordation. It is understood and agreed that this Easement shall be in recordable form and Caltrans review 4.17.18 387 shall be placed on public record subject to changes required, if any, to conform such form to local recording requirements. 16. Miscellaneous. 16.1 All questions concerning the interpretation or application of provisions of this Easement Agreement shall be decided according to the substantive Laws of the State of California without regard to conflicts of law provisions. 16.2 If any action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this Easement Agreement, the prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and necessary disbursements in addition to any other relief to which such party or parties may be entitled. 16.3 If any provision of this Easement Agreement is held to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable under present or future Laws, such provision will be fully severable and this Easement Agreement will be construed and enforced as if such illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision is not a part hereof, and the remaining provisions hereof will remain in full force and effect. In lieu of any illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision herein, there will be added automatically as a part of this Easement Agreement a provision as similar in its terms to such illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision as may be possible and be legal, valid and enforceable. 4 16.4 This Easement is the full and complete agreement between Grantor and Grantee except that in matters of coordination between Grantor and Grantee for construction and maintenance, the previously referenced C&M Agreement shall control in any area of conflict between the two. However, nothing herein is intended to terminate any surviving obligation of Grantee or Grantee's obligation to defend and hold Grantor harmless in any prior written agreement between the parties. 17. Administrative Fees. Grantee acknowledges that a material consideration for this agreement, without which it would not be made, is the agreement between Grantee and Grantor, that the Grantee shall pay upon return of this Agreement signed by Grantee to Grantor's Broker a processing fee in the amount of $2,000.00 over and above the agreed upon Acquisition Price. Said fee shall be made payable to BNSF Railway Company by a separate check. Caltrans review 4.17.18 Witness the execution of this Easement Agreement as of the date first set forth above. GRANTOR: BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation IN Name: Title: THIS IS TO CERTIFY, that the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation (pursuant to Government Code Section 27281), hereby accepts for public purposes the real property described in the within deed and consents to the recordation thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of , 20 _ DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION By Attorney in Fact Caltrans review 4.17.18 STATE OF TEXAS § § SS. COUNTY OF TARRANT § On , 201_ before me, , a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared, , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same in his/her authorized capacity, and that by his/her signature on the instrument the person or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: Caltrans review 4.17.18 (Notary Seal) 390 Caltrans review 4.17.18 EXHIBIT "A" Premises ,'Mmkk� ,Slv 391 EXHIBIT "C" CONTRACTOR REQUIREMENTS 1.01 General: • 1.01.01 The Contractor must cooperate with BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, hereinafter referred to as "Railway" where work is over or under on or adjacent to Railway property and/or right-of-way, hereafter referred to as "Railway Property", during the construction of • 1.01.02 The Contractor must execute and deliver to the Railway duplicate copies of the Exhibit "C-1" Agreement, in the form attached hereto, obligating the Contractor to provide and maintain in full force and effect the insurance called for under Section 3 of said Exhibit "C-1". Questions regarding procurement of the Railroad Protective Liability Insurance should be directed to Rosa Martinez at Marsh, USA, 214-303-8519. • 1.01.03 The Contractor must plan, schedule and conduct all work activities so as not to interfere with the movement of any trains on Railway Property. • 1.01.04 The Contractor's right to enter Railway's Property is subject to the absolute right of Railway to cause the Contractor's work on Railway's Property to cease if, in the opinion of Railway, Contractor's activities create a hazard to Railway's Property, employees, and/or operations. Railway will have the right to stop construction work on the Project if any of the following events take place: (i) Contractor (or any of its subcontractors) performs the Project work in a manner contrary to the plans and specifications approved by Railway; (ii) Contractor (or any of its subcontractors), in Railway's opinion, prosecutes the Project work in a manner which is hazardous to Railway property, facilities or the safe and expeditious movement of railroad traffic; (iii) the insurance described in the attached Exhibit C-1 is canceled during the course of the Project; or (iv) Contractor fails to pay Railway for the Temporary Construction License or the Easement. The work stoppage will continue until all necessary actions are taken by Contractor or its subcontractor to rectify the situation to the satisfaction of Railway's Division Engineer or until additional insurance has been delivered to and accepted by Railway. In the event of a breach of (i) this Agreement, (ii) the Temporary Construction License, or (iii) the Easement, Railway may immediately terminate the Temporary Construction License or the Easement. Any such work stoppage under this provision will not give rise to any liability on the part of Railway. Railway's right to stop the work is in addition to any other rights Railway may have including, but not limited to, actions or suits for damages or lost profits. In the event that Railway desires to stop construction work on the Project, Railway agrees to immediately notify the following individual in writing: Caltrans review 4.17.18 392 1.01.05 The Contractor is responsible for determining and complying with all Federal, State and Local Governmental laws and regulations, including, but not limited to environmental laws and regulations (including but not limited to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended; the Clean Water Act, the Oil Pollution Act, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, CERCLA), and health and safety laws and regulations. The Contractor hereby indemnifies, defends and holds harmless Railway for, from and against all fines or penalties imposed or assessed by Federal, State and Local Governmental Agencies against the Railway which arise out of Contractor's work under this Agreement. 1.01.06 The Contractor must notify (RCTC) at and Railway's Manager Public Projects, telephone number ( ) at least thirty (30) calendar days before commencing any work on Railway Property. Contractor's notification to Railway must refer to Railway's file 1.01.07 For any bridge demolition and/or falsework above any tracks or any excavations located with any part of the excavations located within, whichever is greater, twenty-five (25) feet of the nearest track or intersecting a slope from the plane of the top of rail on a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical slope beginning at eleven (11) feet from centerline of the nearest track, both measured perpendicular to center line of track, the Contractor must furnish the Railway five sets of working drawings showing details of construction affecting Railway Property and tracks. The working drawing must include the proposed method of installation and removal of falsework, shoring or cribbing, not included in the contract plans and two sets of structural calculations of any falsework, shoring or cribbing. For all excavation and shoring submittal plans, the current "BNSF-UPRR Guidelines for Temporary Shoring" must be used for determining the design loading conditions to be used in shoring design, and all calculations and submittals must be in accordance with the current "BNSF-UPRR Guidelines for Temporary Shoring". All submittal drawings and calculations must be stamped by a registered professional engineer licensed to practice in the state the project is located. All calculations must take into consideration railway surcharge loading and must be designed to meet American Railway Engineering and Maintenance -of -Way Association (previously known as American Railway Engineering Association) Coopers E-80 live loading standard. All drawings and calculations must be stamped by a registered professional engineer licensed to practice in the state the project is located. The Contractor must not begin work until notified by the Railway that plans have been approved. The Contractor will be required to use lifting devices such as, cranes and/or winches to place or to remove any falsework over Railway's tracks. In no case will the Contractor be relieved of responsibility for results obtained by the implementation of said approved plans. • 1.01.08 Subject to the movement of Railway's trains, Railway will cooperate with the Contractor such that the work may be handled and performed in an efficient manner. The Contractor will have no claim whatsoever for any type of damages or for extra or additional compensation in the event his work is delayed by the Railway. 1.02 Contractor Safety Orientation 1.02.01 No employee of the Contractor, its subcontractors, agents or invitees may enter Railway Property without first having completed Railway's Engineering Contractor Safety Orientation, found on the web site www.BNSFContractor.com. The Contractor Caltrans review 4.17.18 393 must ensure that each of its employees, subcontractors, agents or invitees completes Railway's Engineering Contractor Safety Orientation through internet sessions before any work is performed on the Project. Additionally, the Contractor must ensure that each and every one of its employees, subcontractors, agents or invitees possesses a card certifying completion of the Railway Contractor Safety Orientation before entering Railway Property. The Contractor is responsible for the cost of the Railway Contractor Safety Orientation. The Contractor must renew the Railway Contractor Safety Orientation annually. Further clarification can be found on the web site or from the Railway's Representative. 1.03 Railway Requirements • 1.03.01 The Contractor must take protective measures as are necessary to keep railway facilities, including track ballast, free of sand, debris, and other foreign objects and materials resulting from his operations. Any damage to railway facilities resulting from Contractor's operations will be repaired or replaced by Railway and the cost of such repairs or replacement must be paid for by the RCTC. 1.03.02 The Contractor must notify at ( ) the Railway for review seven (7) calendar days adjacent to or on Railway's Property. the Railway's Division Engineer and provide blasting plans to prior to conducting any blasting operations • 1.03.03 The Contractor must abide by the following temporary clearances during construction: ■ 15-0" Horizontally from centerline of nearest track ■ 2V-6" Vertically above top of rail ■ 27'-0" Vertically above top of rail for electric wires carrying less than 750 volts ■ 28'-0" Vertically above top of rail for electric wires carrying 750 volts to 15,000 volts ■ 30'-0" Vertically above top of rail for electric wires carrying 15,000 volts to 20,000 volts ■ 34'-0" Vertically above top of rail for electric wires carrying more than 20,000 volts 1.03.04 Upon completion of construction, the following clearances shall be maintained: [Note to Drafter: The vertical clearance should mirror the final negotiated design clearance] ■ 25' Horizontally from centerline of nearest track ■ 23' 6" Vertically above top of rail 1.03.05 Any infringement within State statutory clearances due to the Contractor's operations must be submitted to the Railway and to the RCTC and must not be undertaken until approved in writing by the Railway, and until the RCTC has obtained any necessary authorization from the State Regulatory Authority for the infringement. No extra compensation will be allowed in the event the Contractor's work is delayed pending Railway approval, and/or the State Regulatory Authority's approval. Caltrans review 4.17.18 394 " 1.03.06 In the case of impaired vertical clearance above top of rail, Railway will have the option of installing tell -tales or other protective devices Railway deems necessary for protection of Railway operations. The cost of tell -tales or protective devices will be borne by the RCTC. " 1.03.07 The details of construction affecting the Railway's Property and tracks not included in the contract plans must be submitted to the Railway by RCTC for approval before work is undertaken and this work must not be undertaken until approved by the Railway. 1.03.08 At other than public road crossings, the Contractor must not move any equipment or materials across Railway's tracks until permission has been obtained from the Railway. The Contractor must obtain a "Temporary Construction Crossing Agreement" from the Railway prior to moving his equipment or materials across the Railways tracks. The temporary crossing must be gated and locked at all times when not required for use by the Contractor. The temporary crossing for use of the Contractor will be constructed and, at the completion of the project, removed at the expense of the Contractor. 1.03.09 Discharge, release or spill on the Railway Property of any hazardous substances, oil, petroleum, constituents, pollutants, contaminants, or any hazardous waste is prohibited and Contractor must immediately notify the Railway's Resource Operations Center at 1(800) 832-5452, of any discharge, release or spills in excess of a reportable quantity. Contractor must not allow Railway Property to become a treatment, storage or transfer facility as those terms are defined in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act or any state analogue. " 1.03.10 The Contractor upon completion of the work covered by this contract, must promptly remove from the Railway's Property all of Contractor's tools, equipment, implements and other materials, whether brought upon said property by said Contractor or any Subcontractor, employee or agent of Contractor or of any Subcontractor, and must cause Railway's Property to be left in a condition acceptable to the Railway's representative. 1.04 Contractor Roadway Worker on Track Safety Program and Safety Action Plan: " 1.04.01 Each Contractor that will perform work within 25 feet of the centerline of a track must develop and implement a Roadway Worker Protection/On Track Safety Program and work with Railway Project Representative to develop an on track safety strategy as described in the guidelines listed in the on track safety portion of the Safety Orientation. This Program must provide Roadway Worker protection/on track training for all employees of the Contractor, its subcontractors, agents or invitees. This training is reinforced at the job site through job safety briefings. Additionally, each Contractor must develop and implement the Safety Action Plan, as provided for on the web site www.BNSFContractor.com, which will be made available to Railway prior to commencement of any work on Railway Property. During the performance of work, the Contractor must audit its work activities. The Contractor must designate an on -site Project Supervisor who will serve as the contact person for the Railway and who will maintain a copy of the Safety Action Plan, safety audits, and Material Safety Datasheets (MSDS), at the job site. [Note to Drafter: when appropriate insert e-RailSafe language as follows: " 1.04.02 Contractor shall have a background investigation performed on all of its Caltrans review 4.17.18 395 employees, subcontractors and agents who will be performing any services for Railroad under this Agreement which are determined by Railroad in its sole discretion a) to be on Railroad's property, or b) that require access to Railroad Critical Infrastructure, Railroad Critical Information Systems, Railroad's Employees, Hazardous Materials on Railroad's property or is being transported by or otherwise in the custody of Railroad, or Freight in Transit involving Railroad. The required background screening shall at a minimum meet the rail industry background screening criteria defined by the e-RAILSAFE Program as outlined at www.everifile.com, in addition to any other applicable regulatory requirements. Contractor shall obtain written consent from all its employees, subcontractors or agents screened in compliance with the e-RAILSAFE Program to participate in the Program on their behalf and to release completed background information to Railroad's designee. Contractor shall be subject to periodic audit to ensure compliance. Contractor subject to the e-RAILSAFE Program hereunder shall not permit any of its employees, subcontractors or agents to perform services hereunder who are not first approved under e-RAILSAFE Program standards. Railroad shall have the right to deny entry onto its premises or access as described in this section above to any of Contractor's employees, subcontractors or agents who do not display the authorized identification badge issued by a background screening service meeting the standards set forth in the e-RAILSAFE Program, or who in Railroad's opinion, which may not be unreasonable, may pose a threat to the safety or security of Railroad's operations, assets or personnel. Contractors shall be responsible for ensuring that its employees, subcontractors and agents are United States citizens or legally working in the United States under a lawful and appropriate work VISA or other work authorization. 1.05 Railway Flagger Services: 1.05.01 The Contractor must give Railway's Roadmaster (telephone ) a minimum of thirty (30) calendar days advance notice when flagging services will be required so that the Roadmaster can make appropriate arrangements (i.e., bulletin the flagger's position). If flagging services are scheduled in advance by the Contractor and it is subsequently determined by the parties hereto that such services are no longer necessary, the Contractor must give the Roadmaster five (5) working days advance notice so that appropriate arrangements can be made to abolish the position pursuant to union requirements. 1.05.02 Unless determined otherwise by Railway's Project Representative, Railway flagger will be required and furnished when Contractor's work activities are located over, under and/or within twenty-five (25) feet measured horizontally from centerline of the nearest track and when cranes or similar equipment positioned beyond 25-feet from the track centerline could foul the track in the event of tip over or other catastrophic occurrence, but not limited thereto for the following conditions: Caltrans review 4.17.18 396 " 1.05.02a When, upon inspection by Railway's Representative, other conditions warrant. " 1.05.02b When any excavation is performed below the bottom of tie elevation, if, in the opinion of Railway's representative, track or other Railway facilities may be subject to movement or settlement. " 1.05.02c When work in any way interferes with the safe operation of trains at timetable speeds. " 1.05.02d When any hazard is presented to Railway track, communications, signal, electrical, or other facilities either due to persons, material, equipment or blasting in the vicinity. " 1.05.02e Special permission must be obtained from the Railway before moving heavy or cumbersome objects or equipment which might result in making the track impassable. 1.05.03 Flagging services will be performed by qualified Railway flaggers. 1.05.03a Flagging crew generally consists of one employee. However, additional personnel may be required to protect Railway Property and operations, if deemed necessary by the Railways Representative. 1.05.03b Each time a flagger is called, the minimum period for billing will be the eight (8) hour basic day. 1.05.03c The cost of flagger services provided by the Railway will be borne by R( CTC). The estimated cost for one (1) flagger is approximately between $800.00-$1,600.00 for an eight (8) hour basic day with time and one-half or double time for overtime, rest days and holidays. The estimated cost for each flagger includes vacation allowance, paid holidays, Railway and unemployment insurance, public liability and property damage insurance, health and welfare benefits, vehicle, transportation, meals, lodging, radio, equipment, supervision and other costs incidental to performing flagging services. Negotiations for Railway labor or collective bargaining agreements and rate changes authorized by appropriate Federal authorities may increase actual or estimated flagging rates. THE FLAGGING RATE IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF PERFORMANCE BY THE CONTRACTOR HEREUNDER WILL BE USED TO CALCULATE THE ACTUAL COSTS OF FLAGGING PURSUANT TO THIS PARAGRAPH. 1.05.03d The average train traffic on this route is freight trains per 24-hour period at a timetable speed MPH and passenger trains at a timetable speed of MPH. 1.06 Contractor General Safety Requirements " 1.06.01 Work in the proximity of railway track(s) is potentially hazardous where movement Caltrans review 4.17.18 397 of trains and equipment can occur at any time and in any direction. All work performed by contractors within 25 feet of any track must be in compliance with FRA Roadway Worker Protection Regulations. 1.06.02 Before beginning any task on Railway Property, a thorough job safety briefing must be conducted with all personnel involved with the task and repeated when the personnel or task changes. If the task is within 25 feet of any track, the job briefing must include the Railway's flagger, as applicable, and include the procedures the Contractor will use to protect its employees, subcontractors, agents or invitees from moving any equipment adjacent to or across any Railway track(s). 1.06.03 Workers must not work within 25 feet of the centerline of any track without an on track safety strategy approved by the Railway's Project Representative. When authority is provided, every contractor employee must know: (1) who the Railway flagger is, and how to contact the flagger, (2) limits of the authority, (3) the method of communication to stop and resume work, and (4) location of the designated places of safety. Persons or equipment entering flag/work limits that were not previously job briefed, must notify the flagger immediately, and be given a job briefing when working within 25 feet of the center line of track. • 1.06.04 When Contractor employees are required to work on the Railway Property after normal working hours or on weekends, the Railway's representative in charge of the project must be notified. A minimum of two employees must be present at all times. 1.06.05 Any employees, agents or invitees of Contractor or its subcontractors under suspicion of being under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or in the possession of same, will be removed from the Railway's Property and subsequently released to the custody of a representative of Contractor management. Future access to the Railway's Property by that employee will be denied. 1.06.06 Any damage to Railway Property, or any hazard noticed on passing trains must be reported immediately to the Railway's representative in charge of the project. Any vehicle or machine which may come in contact with track, signal equipment, or structure (bridge) and could result in a train derailment must be reported immediately to the Railway representative in charge of the project and to the Railway's Resource Operations Center at 1(800) 832-5452. Local emergency numbers are to be obtained from the Railway representative in charge of the project prior to the start of any work and must be posted at the job site. 1.06.07 For safety reasons, all persons are prohibited from having pocket knives, firearms or other deadly weapons in their possession while working on Railway's Property. 1.06.08 All personnel protective equipment (PPE) used on Railway Property must meet applicable OSHA and ANSI specifications. Current Railway personnel protective equipment requirements are listed on the web site, www.BNSFContractor.com, however, a partial list of the requirements include: a) safety glasses with permanently affixed side shields (no yellow lenses); b) hard hats; c) safety shoe with: hardened toes, above -the -ankle lace -up and a defined heel; and d) high visibility retro-reflective work wear. The Railway's representative in charge of the project is to be contacted regarding local specifications for meeting requirements relating to hi -visibility work wear. Hearing protection, fall protection, gloves, and respirators must be worn as required by State and Federal regulations. (NOTE — Should there be a discrepancy between the information contained on the web site and the information in Caltrans review 4.17.18 this paragraph, the web site will govern.) 1.06.09 THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOT PILE OR STORE ANY MATERIALS, MACHINERY OR EQUIPMENT CLOSER THAN 25'-0" TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE NEAREST RAILWAY TRACK. MATERIALS, MACHINERY OR EQUIPMENT MUST NOT BE STORED OR LEFT WITHIN 250 FEET OF ANY HIGHWAY/RAIL AT -GRADE CROSSINGS OR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION CROSSING, WHERE STORAGE OF THE SAME WILL OBSTRUCT THE VIEW OF A TRAIN APPROACHING THE CROSSING. PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK, THE CONTRACTOR MUST ESTABLISH A STORAGE AREA WITH CONCURRENCE OF THE RAILWAY'S REPRESENTATIVE. • 1.06.10 Machines or vehicles must not be left unattended with the engine running. Parked machines or equipment must be in gear with brakes set and if equipped with blade, pan or bucket, they must be lowered to the ground. All machinery and equipment left unattended on Railway's Property must be left inoperable and secured against movement. (See internet Engineering Contractor Safety Orientation program for more detailed specifications) • 1.06.11 Workers must not create and leave any conditions at the work site that would interfere with water drainage. Any work performed over water must meet all Federal, State and Local regulations. 1.06.12 All power line wires must be considered dangerous and of high voltage unless informed to the contrary by proper authority. For all power lines the minimum clearance between the lines and any part of the equipment or load must be; 200 KV or below - 15 feet; 200 to 350 KV - 20 feet; 350 to 500 KV - 25 feet; 500 to 750 KV - 35 feet; and 750 to 1000 KV - 45 feet. If capacity of the line is not known, a minimum clearance of 45 feet must be maintained. A person must be designated to observe clearance of the equipment and give a timely warning for all operations where it is difficult for an operator to maintain the desired clearance by visual means. 1.07 Excavation: kv4 1.07.01 Before excavating, the Contractor must determine whether any underground pipe lines, electric wires, or cables, including fiber optic cable systems are present and located within the Project work area. The Contractor must determine whether excavation on Railway's Property could cause damage to buried cables resulting in delay to Railway traffic and disruption of service to users. Delays and disruptions to service may cause business interruptions involving loss of revenue and profits. Before commencing excavation, the Contractor must contact BNSF's Field Engineering Representative ( ). All underground and overhead wires will be considered HIGH VOLTAGE and dangerous until verified with the company having ownership of the line. It is the Contractor's responsibility to notify any other companies that have underground utilities in the area and arrange for the location of all underground utilities before excavating. 1.07.02 The Contractor must cease all work and notify the Railway immediately before continuing excavation in the area if obstructions are encountered which do not appear on drawings. If the obstruction is a utility and the owner of the utility can be identified, then the Contractor must also notify the owner immediately. If there is any doubt about the location of underground cables or lines of any kind, no work must be performed until the exact location Caltrans review 4.17.18 399 has been determined. There will be no exceptions to these instructions. 1.07.03 All excavations must be conducted in compliance with applicable OSHA regulations and, regardless of depth, must be shored where there is any danger to tracks, structures or personnel. • 1.07.04 Any excavations, holes or trenches on the Railway's Property must be covered, guarded and/or protected when not being worked on. When leaving work site areas at night and over weekends, the areas must be secured and left in a condition that will ensure that Railway employees and other personnel who may be working or passing through the area are protected from all hazards. All excavations must be back filled as soon as possible. 1.08 Hazardous Waste, Substances and Material Reporting: 1.08.01 If Contractor discovers any hazardous waste, hazardous substance, petroleum or other deleterious material, including but not limited to any non -containerized commodity or material, on or adjacent to Railway's Property, in or near any surface water, swamp, wetlands or waterways, while performing any work under this Agreement, Contractor must immediately: (a) notify the Railway's Resource Operations Center at 1(800) 832-5452, of such discovery: (b) take safeguards necessary to protect its employees, subcontractors, agents and/or third parties: and (c) exercise due care with respect to the release, including the taking of any appropriate measure to minimize the impact of such release. 1.09 Personal Injury Reporting 1.09.01 The Railway is required to report certain injuries as a part of compliance with Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) reporting requirements. Any personal injury sustained by an employee of the Contractor, subcontractor or Contractor's invitees while on the Railway's Property must be reported immediately (by phone mail if unable to contact in person) to the Railway's representative in charge of the project. The Non -Employee Personal Injury Data Collection Form contained herein is to be completed and sent by Fax to the Railway at 1(817) 352-7595 and to the Railway's Project Representative no later than the close of shift on the date of the injury. Caltrans review 4.17.18 e NON -EMPLOYEE PERSONAL INJURY DATA COLLECTION (If injuries are in connection with rail equipment accident/incident, highway rail grade crossing accident or automobile accident, ensure that appropriate information is obtained, forms completed and that data entry personnel are aware that injuries relate to that specific event.) Injured Person Type: F-1 Passenger on train F-1 Non -employee (N) (i.e., emp of another railroad, or, non-BNSF emp involved in vehicle accident, including company vehicles) nContractor/safety n Contractor/non-safety sensitive (G) F-1 Volunteer/safety F-1 Volunteer/other non -safety sensitive (I) cancitiva (H) ❑ Non -trespasser (D) - to include highway users involved in highway rail arade crossing accidents who did not ao around or throuah aates ❑ Trespasser (E) - to include highway users involved in highway rail grade crossina accidents who went around or throuah aates F-1 Non-trespasser (J) - Off railroad property If train involved, Train ID: Transmit attached information to Accident/Incident Reporting Center by: Caltrans review 4.17.18 401 Fax 1-817-352-7595 or by Phone 1-800-697-6736 Reporting.Center@BNSF.com Officer Providing Information: (Name) or email to: Accident - (Employee No.) (Phone #) REPORT PREPARED TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL ACCIDENT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO 49 U.S.C. Caltrans review 4.17.18 20903 AND 83 U.S.C. 490 402 POVIATI -0011121,019011111100 1 PccidErt atV St: ml,ty. (if r cn B�EFlocaticn) KAeFist/ LireStxjrert: 5. Ch 's Lioerse M (aid state) cr cther I❑ 6. fyre(last, first, rri): 7. P&ess: 8. CAecf Brttr 9. IoLry (i.e, Laoa-aticn, etc.) 11 Da3cripticnofPocidert (Toirdud?locaticn xtim res7lt,etc.): 2 D to 3. Tenpffatrxe oty. aid cr Aga (if adlelde) Trre 4. VtothEr: S9V(req irco: St: ap 1). Body P.Tt: (i.e, Hyr� etc.) 9- TreatnuA: FrstAd®iy ❑ Rq..iredWcd Trertrrert ❑ Qha- Weal TreatM31 B. C7. l ante 1t: a. P&ess: Street: City. St: Zp '6. F-bsptal f�rr� 13. H*td Add-ess: Strext: City. St: 21p V. Clajma Caltrans re REPORT PREPARED TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL ACCIDENT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND PROTECTED FROM DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO 49 U.S.C. 20903 AND 83 U.S.C. 490 403 EXHIBIT "C-1" Agreement Between BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and the CONTRACTOR 7 Railway File: 1�, N. RCTC Project: /+ <%Contractor. Legal Name%> [Insert contractor's legal name here](hereinafter called "Contractor"), has entered into an agreement (hereinafter called "Agreement") dated , 201_, [***Drafter's Note: insert the date of the contract between the RCTC and the Contractor here] with [Drafter's Note: insert the name of the RCTC herel for the performance of certain work in connection with the following project: Performance of such work will necessarily require Contractor to enter BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY (hereinafter called "Railway") right of way and property (hereinafter called "Railway Property"). The Agreement provides that no work will be commenced within Railway Property until the Contractor employed in connection with said work for [insert RCTC name herel (i) executes and delivers to Railway an Agreement in the form hereof, and (ii) provides insurance of the coverage and limits specified in such Agreement and Section 3 herein. If this Agreement is executed by a party who is not the Owner, General Partner, President or Vice President of Contractor, Contractor must furnish evidence to Railway certifying that the signatory is empowered to execute this Agreement on behalf of Contractor. Accordingly, in consideration of Railway granting permission to Contractor to enter upon Railway Property and as an inducement for such entry, Contractor, effective on the date of the Agreement, has agreed and does hereby agree with Railway as follows: Caltrans review 4.17.18 M, 1) RELEASE OF LIABILITY AND INDEMNITY Contractor hereby waives, releases, indemnifies, defends and holds harmless Railway for all judgments, awards, claims, demands, and expenses (including attorneys' fees), for injury or death to all persons, including Railway's and Contractor's officers and employees, and for loss and damage to property belonging to any person, arising in any manner from Contractor's or any of Contractor's subcontractors' acts or omissions or any work performed on or about Railway's property or right-of-way. THE LIABILITY ASSUMED BY CONTRACTOR WILL NOT BE AFFECTED BY THE FACT, IF IT IS A FACT, THAT THE DESTRUCTION, DAMAGE, DEATH, OR INJURY WAS OCCASIONED BY OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY THE NEGLIGENCE OF RAILWAY, ITS AGENTS, SERVANTS, EMPLOYEES OR OTHERWISE, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SUCH CLAIMS ARE PROXIMATELY CAUSED BY THE INTENSIONAL MISCONDUCT OR GROSS NEGLIGENCE OF RAILWAY. [***Note to Drafter: In Arizona, California, Idaho, Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Mexico, and Wyoming check with the Law Department or appropriate local counsel to ensure that the indemnity language is enforceable. In California and Wyoming, replace the word "GROSS" in the last sentence with the word "SOLE" In California replace the word "INTENTIONAL" in the last sentence with the word "WILLFUL". In Washington, replace the preceding sentence in uppercase bold with the following: This obligation shall not include such claims, costs, damages, or expenses which may be caused by the sole negligence of Railway or its contractors, agents or employees; Provided, that if the claims or damages are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence or other acts or omissions of (a) Railway, its contractors, agents or employees and (b) Contractor, its subcontractors, agents or employees, this provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the Contractor, its subcontractors, agents or employees. It is mutually negotiated between the parties that the indemnification obligation shall include all claims brought by Contractor's employees against Railway, its agents, servants, employees or otherwise, and Contractor expressly waives its immunity under the industrial insurance act (RCW Title 51) and assumes potential liability for all actions brought by its employees. THE INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATION ASSUMED BY CONTRACTOR INCLUDES ANY CLAIMS, SUITS OR JUDGMENTS BROUGHT AGAINST RAILWAY UNDER THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEE'S LIABILITY ACT, INCLUDING CLAIMS FOR STRICT LIABILITY UNDER THE SAFETY APPLIANCE ACT OR THE LOCOMOTIVE INSPECTION ACT, WHENEVER SO CLAIMED. Caltrans review 4.17.18 405 Contractor further agrees, at its expense, in the name and on behalf of Railway, that it will adjust and settle all claims made against Railway, and will, at Railway's discretion, appear and defend any suits or actions of law or in equity brought against Railway on any claim or cause of action arising or growing out of or in any manner connected with any liability assumed by Contractor under this Agreement for which Railway is liable or is alleged to be liable. Railway will give notice to Contractor, in writing, of the receipt or dependency of such claims and thereupon Contractor must proceed to adjust and handle to a conclusion such claims, and in the event of a suit being brought against Railway, Railway may forward summons and complaint or other process in connection therewith to Contractor, and Contractor, at Railway's discretion, must defend, adjust, or settle such suits and protect, indemnify, and save harmless Railway from and against all damages, judgments, decrees, attorney's fees, costs, and expenses growing out of or resulting from or incident to any such claims or suits. In addition to any other provision of this Agreement, in the event that all or any portion of this Article shall be deemed to be inapplicable for any reason, including without limitation as a result of a decision of an applicable court, legislative enactment or regulatory order, the parties agree that this Article shall be interpreted as requiring Contractor to indemnify Railway to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. THROUGH THIS AGREEMENT THE PARTIES EXPRESSLY INTEND FOR CONTRACTOR TO INDEMNIFY RAILWAY FOR RAILWAY'S ACTS OF NEGLIGENCE. [***Note to Drafter: In Washington, delete the preceding sentence in bold, as it is not enforceable.] It is mutually understood and agreed that the assumption of liabilities and indemnification provided for in this Agreement survive any termination of this Agreement. �4 2) TERM ,%hl This Agreement is effective from the date of the Agreement until (i) the completion of the project set forth herein, and (ii) full and complete payment to Railway of any and all sums or other amounts owing and due hereunder. 3) INSURANCE Contractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, procure and maintain during the life of this Agreement the following insurance coverage: Caltrans review 4.17.18 H1. A. Commercial General Liability insurance. This insurance shall contain broad form contractual liability with a combined single limit of a minimum of $5,000,000 each occurrence and an aggregate limit of at least $10,000,000 but in no event less than the amount otherwise carried by the Contractor. Coverage must be purchased on a post 2004 ISO occurrence form or equivalent and include coverage for, but not limit to the following: ♦ Bodily Injury and Property Damage ♦ Personal Injury and Advertising Injury ♦ Fire legal liability ♦ Products and completed operations This policy shall also contain the following endorsements, which shall be indicated on the certificate of insurance: ♦ The definition of insured contract shall be amended to remove any exclusion or other limitation for any work being done within 50 feet of railroad property. ♦ Waver of subrogation in favor of and acceptable to Railway. ♦ Additional insured endorsement in favor of and acceptable to Railway. ♦ Separation of insureds. ♦ The policy shall be primary and non-contributing with respect to any insurance carried by Railway. It is agreed that the workers' compensation and employers' liability related exclusions in the Commercial General Liability insurance policy(s) required herein are intended to apply to employees of the policy holder and shall not apply to Railway employees. No other endorsements limiting coverage as respects obligations under this -Agreement may be included on the policy with regard to the work being performed under this agreement. B. Business Automobile Insurance. This insurance shall contain a combined single limit of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence, and include coverage for, but not limited to the following: Caltrans review 4.17.18 407 f& Bodily injury and property damage f& Any and all vehicles owned, used or hired The policy shall also contain the following endorsements or language, which shall be indicated on the certificate of insurance: f& Waiver of subrogation in favor of and acceptable to Railway. f& Additional insured endorsement in favor of and acceptable to Railway. f& Separation of insureds. f& The policy shall be primary and non-contributing with respect to any insurance carried by Railway. C. Workers Compensation and Employers Liability insurance including coverage for, but not limited to: f& Contractor's statutory liability under the worker's compensation laws of the state(s) in which the work is to be performed. If optional under State law, the insurance must cover all employees anyway. f& Employers' Liability (Part B) with limits of at least $500,000 each accident, $500,000 by disease policy limit, $500,000 by disease each employee. This policy shall also contain the following endorsements or language, which shall be indicated on the certificate of insurance: f& Waiver of subrogation in favor of and acceptable to Railway. A. Railroad Protective Liability insurance naming only the Railway as the Insured with coverage of at least $5,000,000 per occurrence and $10,000,000 in the aggregate. The policy Must be issued on a standard ISO form CG 00 35 12 04 and include the following: Caltrans review 4.17.18 M f& Endorsed to include the Pollution Exclusion Amendment f& Endorsed to include the Limited Seepage and Pollution Endorsement. f& Endorsed to remove any exclusion for punitive damages. f& No other endorsements restricting coverage may be added. f& The original policy must be provided to the Railway prior to performing any work or services under this Agreement f& Definition of "Physical Damage to Property" shall be endorsed to read: "means direct and accidental loss of or damage to all property owned by any named insured and all property in any named insured' care, custody, and control arising out of the acts or omissions of the contractor named on the Declarations. Ahh�� k In lieu of providing a Railroad Protective Liability Policy, Licensee may participate (if available) in Railway's Blanket Railroad Protective Liability Insurance Policy. Other Requirements: Where allowable by law, all policies (applying to coverage listed above) shall contain no exclusion for punitive damages. Contractor agrees to waive its right of recovery against Railway for all claims and suits against Railway. In addition, its insurers, through the terms of the policy or policy endorsement, waive their right of subrogation against Railway for all claims and suits. Contractor further waives its right of recovery, and its insurers also waive their right of subrogation against Railway for loss of its owned or leased property or property under Contractor's care, custody or control. Allocated Loss Expense shall be in addition to all policy limits for coverages referenced above. Contractor is not allowed to self -insure without the prior written consent of Railway. If granted by Railway, any self -insured retention or other financial responsibility for claims shall be covered directly by Contractor in lieu of insurance. Any and all Railway liabilities that would otherwise, in accordance with Caltrans review 4.17.18 M the provisions of this Agreement, be covered by Contractor's insurance will be covered as if Contractor elected not to include a deductible, self -insured retention or other financial responsibility for claims. Prior to commencing services, Contractor shall furnish to Railway an acceptable certificate(s) of insurance from an authorized representative evidencing the required coverage(s), endorsements, and amendments. The certificate should be directed to the following address: BNSF Railway Company c/o CertFocus P.O. Box 140528 Kansas City, MO 64114 Toll Free: 877-576-2378 Fax number: 817-840-7487 Email: BNSF(a)-certfocus.com www.certfocus.com Contractor shall notify Railway in writing at least 30 days prior to any cancellation, non -renewal, substitution or material alteration. Any insurance policy shall be written by a reputable insurance company acceptable to Railway or with a current Best's Guide Rating of A- and Class VII or better, and authorized to do business in the state(s) in which the service is to be provided. If coverage is purchased on a "claims made" basis, Contractor hereby agrees to maintain coverage in force for a minimum of three years after expiration, cancellation or termination of this Agreement. Annually Contractor agrees to provide evidence of such coverage as required hereunder. Contractor represents that this Agreement has been thoroughly reviewed by Contractor's insurance agent(s)/broker(s), who have been instructed by Contractor to procure the insurance coverage required by this Agreement. Caltrans review 4.17.18 410 Not more frequently than once every five years, Railway may reasonably modify the required insurance coverage to reflect then -current risk management practices in the railroad industry and underwriting practices in the insurance industry. If any portion of the operation is to be subcontracted by Contractor, Contractor shall require that the subcontractor shall provide and maintain insurance coverage(s) as set forth herein, naming Railway as an additional insured, and shall require that the subcontractor shall release, defend and indemnify Railway to the same extent and under the same terms and conditions as Contractor is required to release, defend and indemnify Railway herein. Failure to provide evidence as required by this section shall entitle, but not require, Railway to terminate this Agreement immediately. Acceptance of a certificate that does not comply with this section shall not operate as a waiver of Contractor's obligations hereunder. The fact that insurance (including, without limitation, self-insurance) is obtained by Contractor shall not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of Contractor including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this Agreement. Damages recoverable by Railway shall not be limited by the amount of the required insurance coverage. In the event of a claim or lawsuit involving Railway arising out of this agreement, Contractor will make available any required policy covering such claim or lawsuit. r� 1 These insurance provisions are intended to be a separate and distinct obligation on the part of the Contractor. Therefore, these provisions shall be enforceable and Contractor shall be bound thereby regardless of whether or not indemnity provisions are determined to be enforceable in the jurisdiction in which the work covered hereunder is performed. For purposes of this section, Railway shall mean "Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC", "BNSF Railway Company" and the subsidiaries, successors, assigns and affiliates of each. 4) SALES AND OTHER TAXES Caltrans review 4.17.18 411 In the event applicable sales taxes of a state or political subdivision of a state of the United States are levied or assessed in connection with and directly related to any amounts invoiced by Contractor to Railway ("Sales Taxes"), Railway shall be responsible for paying only the Sales Taxes that Contractor separately states on the invoice or other billing documents provided to Railway; provided, however, that (i) nothing herein shall preclude Railway from claiming whatever Sales Tax exemptions are applicable to amounts Contractor bills Railway, (ii) Contractor shall be responsible for all sales, use, excise, consumption, services and other taxes which may accrue on all services, materials, equipment, supplies or fixtures that Contractor and its subcontractors use or consume in the performance of this Agreement, (iii) Contractor shall be responsible for Sales Taxes (together with any penalties, fines or interest thereon) that Contractor fails to separately state on the invoice or other billing documents provided to Railway or fails to collect at the time of payment by Railway of invoiced amounts (except where Railway claims a Sales Tax exemption), and (iv) Contractor shall be responsible for Sales Taxes (together with any penalties, fines or interest thereon) if Contractor fails to issue separate invoices for each state in which Contractor delivers goods, provides services or, if applicable, transfers intangible rights to Railway. Upon request, Contractor shall provide Railway satisfactory evidence that all taxes (together with any penalties, fines or interest thereon) that Contractor is responsible to pay under this Agreement have been paid. If a written claim is made against Contractor for Sales Taxes with respect to which Railway may be liable for under this Agreement, Contractor shall promptly notify Railway of such claim and provide Railway copies of all correspondence received from the taxing authority. Railway shall have the right to contest, protest, or claim a refund, in Railway's own name, any Sales Taxes paid by Railway to Contractor or for which Railway might otherwise be responsible for under this Agreement; provided, however, that if Railway is not permitted by law to contest any such Sales Tax in its own name, Contractor shall, if requested by Railway at Railway's sole cost and expense, contest in Contractor's own name the validity, applicability or amount of such Sales Tax and allow Railway to control and conduct such contest. Railway retains the right to withhold from payments made under this Agreement amounts required to be withheld under tax laws of any jurisdiction. If Contractor is claiming a withholding exemption or a reduction in the withholding rate of any jurisdiction on any payments under this Agreement, before any payments are made (and in each succeeding period or year as required by law), Contractor agrees to furnish to Railway a properly completed exemption form prescribed by such jurisdiction. Contractor shall be responsible for any taxes, interest or penalties assessed against Railway with respect to withholding taxes that Railway does not withhold from payments to Contractor. Caltrans review 4.17.18 412 1) EXHIBIT "C" CONTRACTOR REQUIREMENTS The Contractor must observe and comply with all provisions, obligations, requirements and limitations contained in the Agreement, and the Contractor Requirements set forth on Exhibit "C" attached to the Agreement and this Agreement, including, but not be limited to, payment of all costs incurred for any damages to Railway roadbed, tracks, and/or appurtenances thereto, resulting from use, occupancy, or presence of its employees, representatives, or agents or subcontractors on or about the construction site. Contractor shall execute a Temporary Construction Crossing Agreement or Private Crossing Agreement (http://www.bnsf.com/communities/fags/permits-real-estate/), for any temporary crossing requested to aid in the construction of this Project, if approved by BNSF. 2) TRAIN DELAY Contractor is responsible for and hereby indemnifies and holds harmless Railway (including its affiliated railway companies, and its tenants) for, from and against all damages arising from any unscheduled delay to a freight or passenger train which affects Railway's ability to fully utilize its equipment and to meet customer service and contract obligations. Contractor will be billed, as further provided below, for the economic losses arising from loss of use of equipment, contractual loss of incentive pay and bonuses and contractual penalties resulting from train delays, whether caused by Contractor, or subcontractors, or by the Railway performing work under this Agreement. Railway agrees that it will not perform any act to unnecessarily cause train delay. For loss of use of equipment, Contractor will be billed the current freight train hour rate per train as determined from Railway's records. Any disruption to train traffic may cause delays to multiple trains at the same time for the same period. Additionally, the parties acknowledge that passenger, U.S. mail trains and certain other grain, intermodal, coal and freight trains operate under incentive/penalty contracts between Railway and its customer(s). Under these arrangements, if Railway does not meet its contract service commitments, Railway may suffer loss of performance or incentive pay and/or be subject to penalty payments. Contractor is responsible for any train performance and incentive penalties or other contractual economic losses actually incurred by Railway which are attributable to a train delay caused by Contractor or its subcontractors. The contractual relationship between Railway and its customers is proprietary and confidential. In the event of a train delay covered by this Agreement, Railway will share information relevant to any train delay to the extent consistent with Railway confidentiality obligations. The rate then in effect at the time Caltrans review 4.17.18 413 of performance by the Contractor hereunder will be used to calculate the actual costs of train delay pursuant to this agreement. Contractor and its subcontractors must give Railway's representative ( ) (_) weeks advance notice of the times and dates for proposed work windows. Railway and Contractor will establish mutually agreeable work windows for the project. Railway has the right at any time to revise or change the work windows due to train operations or service obligations. Railway will not be responsible for any additional costs or expenses resulting from a change in work windows. Additional costs or expenses resulting from a change in work windows shall be accounted for in Contractor's expenses for the project. Contractor and subcontractors must plan, schedule, coordinate and conduct all Contractor's work so as to not cause any delays to any trains. Caltrans review 4.17.18 414 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officer the day and year first above written. <%Contractor. Legal Name%> In Printed Name: Title Contact Person Address: City: State: Zip: Fax: Caltrans review 4.17.18 BNSF Railway Company Name: Manager Public Projects Accepted and effective this day of 20 415 Phone: E-mail Caltrans review 4.17.18 G�~ 416 Caltrans review 4.17.18 EXHIBIT D [Insert Cost Estimate for Railroad Work here] 417 Date Mr./Ms FYhihif F [Public Projects Manager's letterhead] ame of RCTC Here] [Address for RCTC] N�'r ,4hk, �% Re: Final Approval of Plans and Specifications dated , 20_, drafted by [insert name of architecture or engineering firm here] (hereinafter called, the "Plans and Specifications") Dear This letter serves as BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY's ("BNSF") final written approval of the Plans and Specifications covering the construction of [insert description of the project here]. This final written approval is given to [insert name of RCTC here] ("RCTC") pursuant to Article III, Section 1 of that certain Underpass Agreement between BNSF and RCTC, dated , 20_, which this Exhibit E is attached to and made a part thereof. If the Plans and Specifications are revised by RCTC subsequent to the date set forth above, this letter shall no longer serve as final written approval of the Plans and Specifications and RCTC must resubmit said Plans and Specifications to BNSF for final written approval. Caltrans review 4.17.18 EM It is understood that the approvals contained in this letter do not cover, the approvals of plans and specifications for any falsework, shoring, and demolition that may be subsequently submitted to BNSF by CITY or its contractor for approval. BNSF has not reviewed the design details or calculations for structural integrity or engineering accuracy. BNSF accepts no responsibility for errors or omissions in the design of the project. Regards, [Public Projects Manager's Name] Caltrans review 4.17.18 419 Exhibit F BNSF Bridte Requirements BRIDGE DESIGN, PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS: Except for the design of temporary falsework and shoring, BNSF review of the Structure plans will be limited to the vertical and horizontal clearances, sight distance for existing train signals, foundation dimensions and drainage characteristics as they relate to existing and future tracks. BNSF will not review structural design calculations for the permanent Structure unless a member or members are influenced by railroad live loads. Temporary falsework and shoring plans and calculations must be reviewed and approved by BNSF prior to beginning construction. The RCTC shall perform an independent review of the design calculations for temporary falsework and shoring prior to submitting them to BNSF for approval. Temporary construction clearances must be no less than 15 feet measured horizontally from the centerline of the nearest track and 21 feet-6 inches measured vertically from the top of rail of the most elevated track to the bottom of lowest temporary falsework member. State regulatory agencies may have more restrictive requirements for temporary railroad clearances. For the permanent Structure, the RCTC will submit plans showing the least horizontal distance from the centerline of existing and future tracks to the face of the nearest member of the proposed Structure. The location of the least horizontal distance must be accurately described such that BNSF can determine where it will occur in both the horizontal and vertical plane. If the permanent member is within 25 feet of the nearest track (or future track), collision walls shall be incorporated into the permanent Structure design according to American Railway Engineering and Maintenance Association Manual of Recommended Practice - Chapter 8 - Article 2.1.5. For the permanent Structure, the RCTC will submit plans showing the least vertical clearance from top of the most elevated rail of existing and future tracks to the lowest point of the proposed Structure. A profile of the existing top of rail elevation shall be plotted on the bridge plans. The profile shall extend for 500 feet in each direction of the proposed overpass and a separate profile shall be plotted for each track. If the existing top of rail profile(s) is not uniform such that a sag exists in the vicinity of the proposed Structure, the permanent Structure vertical clearance shall be increased sufficiently to accommodate a raise in the track profile to remove the sag. Prior to beginning construction of the permanent Structure, the Caltrans review 4.17.18 420 top of rail elevations should be checked and verified that they have not changed from the assumed elevations utilized for the design of the bridge. Prior to issuing any invitation to bid on construction of the Structure, the RCTC should conduct a pre -bid meeting where prospective Providers have the opportunity to communicate with BNSF personnel regarding site specific train speeds, train density, and general safety requirements for men and equipment working near live tracks. Any invitation to bid and specifications for the Structure must be submitted to BNSF for review and approval prior to letting of bids for the Project. BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION: After awarding the bid, but prior to the Provider entering BNSF's right -of —way or property, the RCTC should conduct a pre -construction meeting with BNSF personnel in attendance to reiterate the safety requirements of construction activity adjacent to live tracks. During construction, BNSF may require an independent engineering inspector to be present during certain critical activities of the Project, including but not limited to: driving foundation piles, erecting falsework, construction of shoring and retaining walls, placing concrete, placing soil backfill and compaction processes. The RCTC shall reimburse BNSF for all costs of supplemental inspection services. Within 90 days of the conclusion of the Project and final acceptance by BNSF, the RCTC will provide BNSF with a complete electronic set of the bridge plans labeled "As Built". Those plans will reflect any and all deviations from the original plans that occurred during construction. The "As Built" plans will be submitted in Micro Station *.dgn electronic format (preferred) or AutoCAD *.dwg format. Electronic plans are to be submitted in the original format used for CAD plan preparation and not converted to another format prior to submission. Actual measured "as constructed" clearances shall be shown as well as depth, size and location of all foundation components. The plans shall show dimensioned locations of existing and relocated utilities. BRIDGE MAINTENANCE: Caltrans review 4.17.18 421 The RCTC will be responsible for maintenance and repair of the Structure including the earth retention components, embankment slopes, erosion control, surface drainage, fencing, deck drains, landscaping, paint, walkways, handrails, lighting, and other improvements associated with the Project. Fencing and other pedestrian access controls within BNSF's right-of-way and incorporated into the Project shall be designed and maintained by the RCTC. Trespasser control shall be the responsibility of the RCTC. Graffiti removal will be the responsibility of the RCTC. BRIDGE INSPECTION: The RCTC will conduct annual routine structural inspections. In the event of an earthquake, fire, flood, damage from vehicular impacts or other emergent situations, the RCTC will provide an immediate inspection by qualified personnel and notify BNSF of damage that may affect safe passage of trains. If necessary the RCTC will embargo weights or provide lane closures or other such measures to protect the structural integrity of the Structure such that there can be continuous safe passage of trains until repairs are made. BRIDGE ALTERATIONS: Except as provided otherwise by this Agreement, there will be no alterations made to the Structure that will alter the railroad vertical or horizontal clearances provided by the original design. Pipelines will be not be added or attached to the Structure without first submitting plans and calculations to BNSF for review and approval. Caltrans review 4.17.18 422 Caltrans review 4.17.18 Exhibit G LEGAL DESCRIPTION Gay Q 1 423 Exhibit H BNSF INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARATION OF DEMOLITION PLANS Caltrans review 4.17.18 Gay L 424 AGENDA ITEM 80 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission Mark Lancaster, Right of Way Manager FROM: Ruby Arellano, Management Analyst THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director Amendment to Agreement for Routine and On -Call Railroad Right of Way SUBJECT: Property Maintenance Services STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 17-33-028-02, Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 17-33-028- 00, with Joshua Grading & Excavating, Inc. (Joshua Grading) to provide grading, upgrades, and repairs property maintenance services in the amount of $1 million for a total amount not to exceed $4 million; 2) Authorize the revised statement of work, updated maintenance and repair requirements, and provision for work on non -railroad property; 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 4) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute task orders awarded to the contractor under the terms of the agreement; and 5) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency work pursuant to the agreement terms up to the total amount. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission owns and maintains approximately 24 miles of operating railroad right of way (ROW) and approximately 14 miles of inactive railroad ROW. The Commission's maintenance begins at a junction with the BNSF Railway (BNSF) line north of the city of Riverside and turns southeast along the San Jacinto Branch Line. The terminus for the active line is in the city of Menifee, west of Sherman Road. This corridor is operated by the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) for the Metrolink commuter trains and by BNSF for freight trains. The inactive line terminates north of 71" Street in the city of San Jacinto. To allow for the safe and efficient operation of passenger and freight trains, the ROW needs to comply with federal, state, and local regulations regarding weed abatement, fire prevention, and nuisance liability standards. Services required consist of weed abatement and vegetation control (fire hazard prevention), herbicide and pesticide applications, removal of debris and trash, Agenda Item 80 425 fencing and barricade installation and/or repairs, earthwork, grading, drainage repairs, graffiti abatement and control, tree trimming and removals, installation/maintenance/repair of railroad signage, and abatement of illegal structures and shelters and related items, materials and substances associated with transient or homeless persons trespassing upon the ROW. The abatement of illegal structures and shelters is carried out in coordination with applicable local law enforcement and in accordance with direction from the Commission and its legal counsel, which may require consultation and coordination with recognized service agencies and/or advocacy organizations serving the homeless population in appropriate cases. The removal of hazardous materials is coordinated with a licensed hazardous materials consultant. At its January 11, 2017 meeting, the Commission approved the railroad right of way property maintenance services agreement between the Commission and Joshua Grading for a total amount of $3 million. The Perris Valley Line (PVL), a 24-mile extension of the 91 Metrolink service, commenced operations on June 2, 2016. Initially, the staff report and scope of work was written using estimated maintenance activities and costs based on work actually performed on the PVL over the initial six months of rail service. Since then, staff reevaluated the needs based on almost two years of actual maintenance work and updated the scope of work to more accurately reflect the Commission's maintenance and repair needs. Accordingly, staff recommends an amendment to the agreement to update the scope of work and costs; however, the contingency amount is to remain unchanged. Weed abatement and grading (to maintain and improve drainage) account for the majority of the work performed under this agreement. In addition, work on property outside the rail right of way, homeless encampments and dumping cleanup contribute significantly to the increase in the amount of work anticipated. Staff recommends approval of Agreement No. 17-33-028-02 for routine and on -call railroad right of way maintenance services for an additional amount of $1 million and a total amount not to exceed $4 million. Financial Information Yes FY 2017/18 $200,000 In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2018/19 Amount: $200,000 N/A FY 2019/20+ $600,000 Source of Funds: 2009 Measure A Western County Rail Budget Adjustment: No No funds N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 652402 86105 00000 0000 265 33 86105 XXXXXX 81403 00000 0000 265 33 81401 (various projects) Fiscal Procedures Approved: �� Date: 05/23/2018 Attachment: Draft Agreement No. 17-33-028-02 Agenda Item 80 426 ATTACHMENT 1 Agreement No. 17-33-028-02 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO ROUTINE AND ON -CALL RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT 1. PARTIES AND DATE This Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement for routine and on -call railroad right of way maintenance services is made and entered into as of this day of , 2018, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("Commission") and JOSHUA GRADING & EXCAVATING, INC. a corporation ("Consultant"). 2. RECITALS 2.1 The Commission and the Consultant entered into an agreement, dated March 2, 2017, for the purpose of providing routine and on -call railroad right of way maintenance services 2.2 The Commission and the Consultant entered into Amendment No. 1 dated, August 3, 2017, for the purpose of revising Exhibit "C" Compensation of the Master Agreement. 2.3 The Commission and the Consultant now desire to amend the Master Agreement by revising Exhibit "A" Scope of Services and to provide additional compensation for continued railroad right of way property maintenance services. 3. TERMS 3.1 Exhibit "A" of the Master Agreement entitled "Scope of Services" is hereby replaced, in its entirety, with the version of Exhibit "A" attached to this Amendment No. 2 as Exhibit "A" Scope of Services and incorporated herein by reference. 3.2 The maximum compensation for Services performed pursuant to this Amendment No. 2 shall be One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). 3.3 The maximum not to exceed value of the Master Agreement as amended shall be increased from One Million Six Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($1,650,000) to Two Million Six Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($2,650,000). Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 3.4 Except as amended herein, all provisions of the Master Agreement, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment No. 2. [Signatures on following page] Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT NO. 17-33-028-02 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION la Anne Mayer, Executive Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: -31 Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel * A corporation requires the signatures of two corporate officers. JOSHUA GRADING & EXCAVATING, INC. Signature 1�iir Title One signature shall be that of the chairman of board, the president or any vice president and the second signature (on the attest line) shall be that of the secretary, any assistant secretary, the chief financial officer or any assistant treasurer of such corporation. If the above persons are not the intended signators, evidence of signature authority shall be provided to RCTC. Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES [Attached behind this page] Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 SCOPE OF WORK ROUTINE AND ON -CALL RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY PROPERTY MAINTENANCE SERVICES 1. BACKGROUND The Riverside County Transportation Commission (Commission) owns and maintains approximately 24 miles of the operating railroad right of way and 14 miles of inactive railroad right of way, within the County of Riverside. Refer to the most current RCTC Map Book. This Corridor is operated by the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), for the Metrolink commuter trains and freight trains by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF). To allow for the safe and efficient operation of passenger and freight trains, the railroad ROW needs to comply with Federal, State, and local regulations regarding weed abatement, fire prevention, and nuisance liability standards. WORK TO BE PERFORMED The Consultant shall provide right of way maintenance services for the San Jacinto Branchline Subdivision. The Consultant shall maintain the appearance of the property, facilities and structures (bridges, retaining walls, and signs); in compliance with Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), California Public Utilities Commission, and the various municipal code requirements of the local agencies within the county of Riverside. Services shall consist of weed abatement & vegetation control (fire hazard prevention), herbicide & pesticide applications, removal of debris & trash, fencing and barricade installation and/or repairs, earthwork, grading, drainage repairs, graffiti abatement & control, tree trimming & removals, installation/maintenance/repair of railroad signage, and abatement of illegal structures and shelters and related items, materials and substances associated with transient or homeless persons trespassing upon the ROW, which shall be carried out in coordination with applicable local law enforcement and in accordance with direction from the Commission and its legal counsel, which may require consultation and coordination with recognized service agencies and/or advocacy organizations serving the homeless population in appropriate cases. The removal of hazardous materials shall be coordinated with a licensed hazardous materials Consultant. Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 In cases where the cost of work covered by public works contracting requirements under the Public Contracts Code or other state law (including, without limitation, installation or repair fencing, work on drainage and/or drainage facilities, and/or construction or demolition of structures within the ROW) would equal or exceed $25,000, state law requires such a project to be performed pursuant to a public works contract awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Consultant shall promptly notify the Commission whenever Consultant believes that any potential such instances, Consultant shall cooperate fully with the Commission, shall assist in preparing specifications and other bid documents at the Commission's request, and shall cooperate and coordinate with the selected consultant. Consultant acknowledges that if Consultant assists the Commission in such pre -bid matters, Consultant shall not be eligible to bid on that project. Consultant shall consult with and follow the Commission's instructions with respect to the determination of when a project will or may be subject to such a separate bidding process. 2.1 Weed Abatement & Vegetation Control Weed abatement and vegetation control, shall be performed in accordance with California Health and Safety Codes and municipal code requirements of the county of Riverside. The purpose of this service is to prevent fire hazards posed by vegetative growth and accumulation of combustible materials. Except as noted below, vegetation and weeds should be regulated and cut so as to not exceed 6 inches in height within the right of ways, and shall be kept at 3 inches when 0 to 100 feet from structures. Weed abatement shall be by mowing, gas powered weed trimmers or by use of hand tools, to augment the herbicide program. Consultant shall dispose of vegetation and/or weeds (including cut brush). Decorative landscaping, erosion control, vegetation, and natural vegetation in open space areas, will be removed at the direction of the Commission's Project Manager. 2.2. Herbicide and Pesticide Application Herbicide application will be a pre -emergent application in the fall and spot treatments of contact herbicides on an as necessary basis during the Summer and late Fall. Herbicide application shall be completed by a Certified Pest Control Applicator, under the supervision of a Pest Control Advisor. All personnel shall be licensed, by the State of California and all work will have written Pest Control Recommendations - submitted to the County Agricultural Commissioner in accordance with applicable regulations. The Commission's Project Manager will confer with the Pest Control Advisor to determine the best chemical and rate of application on an individual parcel basis. This work is supplemental to herbicide control currently performed by SCRRA's Track, Structures and Right of way Maintenance Consultant, under separate contract. The Commission will identify areas that require Herbicide Control. Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 The Commission's Project Manager shall be notified at least one week in advance of the time set for application of any chemicals so that a Commission representative may witness the application. The notification shall include all related MSDS certifications for all herbicides, pest control, and other chemical materials. 2.3 Clean -Up of Debris and Trash (non -hazardous waste) Remove and dispose of all non -hazardous litter regardless of type or origin. Materials to be removed generally require the use of hand tools and includes, but is not limited to, removal of paper products and cardboard, metal scrap and junk of any type, auto, appliances; construction fill -dirt, utility or demolition materials; barrels, pails, tires, cans and glass; deposited trees, brush, leaves or cuttings; any type of furniture or furniture remains; mattresses, bedding blankets, tarps and construction and encampments. Any item other than hazardous chemical waste not native to the excess land is subject to removal. Pick-up non -hazardous debris and trash on the excess land, and will remove, place and dispose of vegetation and refuse at specified dump sites within Riverside County. Materials to be removed may require the use of heavy equipment and includes, but is not limited to, broken concrete, asphalt, construction debris, scrap metal, furniture, appliances, automobile parts, shopping carts, tires, trees, dead vegetation, dead animals, bagged or loose trash. Individual items shall be handled manually, within Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. Items exceeding these weights shall be handled by cranes or tractors. 2.4 Fence and Barricade Installation, Repairs and Minor Upgrades Work shall consist of new fence installation, repair to existing, and incidental upgrades to: welded wire mesh, chain link, post and cable, and any other fencing or barrier repairs as may be required. The frequency of fence repair is dependent upon vandalism and/or accidents which occur along the right of way. New fence material shall be chain link, welded wire mesh, or a Commission approved equal. New fence installation will be at the direction of the Commission's Project Manager. 2.5 Drainage System and Maintenance Repairs Consultant shall remove silt, drift, and/or obstructions, from drainage channels, and restore erosion damage, upon direction of the Commission's Project Manager. The removal of vegetation and/or debris will be done in a manner which preserves the functional performance of all drainage facilities and in a manner that does not create depressions in the ground capable of ponding water. Consultant will also be required to maintain the Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 Commission's railroad right of way vehicular access roads, removing any obstructions and repairing erosion damage. Consultant shall place erosion prevention materials (i.e. sandbags, silt fence, fiber rolls, etc.) along areas of ROW where potential flooding of adjacent properties may occur at the Commission's Project Manager's direction. This shall be done prior to any inclement weather, if possible. The Commission's Project Manager may request Consultant's crew work outside of normal scheduled days during times of excessive inclement weather. 2.6 Graffiti Abatement & Control Consultant shall control graffiti through painting or cleaning on structures, walls, fences, signs, bridges and abutments, under the direction of the Commission's Project Manager. Paint shall be applied by roller, brush, or spray apparatus, (including extension arms from 10' to 25% when requested. Consultant shall use water -based paint, except on roadway signs, where chemical cleaners will be used. (Consultant will consult with the Commission's Project Manager for situations where cleaning is ineffective, and may be directed to utilize other cleaners or to apply aluminum paint.) Application of paint or cleaning of graffiti will be performed so as to preserve railroad operating information on signs, and structures (only as directed) (e.g. speed signs, milepost signs, and roadway signs). Graffiti removal on aluminum signal houses and apparatus' will be handled by SCRRA Signal forces. 2.7 Tree Trimming and Removals Consultant shall trim and/or remove trees in order to maintain clear visibility of railroad signals and grade crossings, as well as those on the Commission's property causing harm to adjacent property/facilities/etc. Consultant shall provide labor and equipment necessary to clear areas where required in order to maintain the right of ways and railroad signals, unobstructed. Work will consist of tree trimming and/or removals, occasional tree replanting, pole line removal and transport and brush removal. Due to the inaccessibility of certain properties, some trees may need to be climbed with the aid of ropes and others may require use of boom truck with a standard bucket lift, in order to be trimmed. Fall Protection shall be used where required. Tree Work Safety The Consultant shall perform their work method in compliance with federal standards, local city ordinances and requirements, and CCR Title 8 (Cal/OSHA), Article 12. Tree Work, Maintenance or Removal Standards, and Subchapter 13, Logging and Sawmill Safety Orders, Article 5. Falling and Bucking as applicable to scope. The Consultant shall fully understand and comply with the applicable Cal/OSHA standards and maintain Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 required documentation available at the scope task site for review by the Authority's representative. 2.8 Maintenance, Repair and/or New Installation of Property and No -Trespassing Signs Maintenance of existing property and no -trespassing signs within the Commission's owned property shall consist of cleaning (wiping clean, or by chemical cleaner) signs to remove graffiti or other substance hindering visibility of words. Repair will consist of correcting bent or broken posts and replace missing hardware (anti -vandalism type). Repair to existing signage is required prior to replacing with new. Consultant shall provide necessary chemicals for removal of graffiti from signs, as well as other materials required to perform this task. 2.9 Pest/Insect Control Consultant shall perform, on a case by case basis, reasonable pest/insect control to maintain the railroad right of way free of pests/insects. 2.10 Flagging Consultant will have available an Employee in Charge (EIC)/Flagman as needed, to provide protection for other municipalities or Commission staff that may need access to the operating right of way. 2.11 Earthwork Earthwork and related operations, including, but not limited to, clearing and grubbing, dewatering, excavating all classes of material encountered, pumping, draining and handling of water encountered in the excavations, handling, storage, transportation, and disposal of all excavated and unsuitable material, construction of fills and embankments, backfilling around structures and pipe, backfilling all trenches and pits, compacting, all sheeting, shoring and bracing, preparation of subgrades, surfacing and grading, and any other similar, incidental, or appurtenant earthwork operation which may be necessary to properly complete the work. Tests for compaction and density shall be performed. 2.12 Coordination with Law Enforcement and other Agencies It shall be the consultant's responsibility to coordinate its efforts with and secure all required permits and approvals from other agencies and jurisdictions (including, but not limited to: Caltrans, CHP, Army Corps of Engineers, County of Riverside, SCRRA, etc) and make all other necessary arrangements to safely and lawfully perform the services described herein. The consultant shall perform all such work in accordance Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 with all local, federal, state, county, municipal, Cal -OSHA, and other applicable laws and ordinances. 2.13 Competitive Bids The Commission reserves the right to competitively bid any or all portions of work addressed in this agreement. 3. LABOR SKILLS AND STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE These performance standards shall apply to Consultant in the performance of any subsequent work or specialized trades herein, including any sub- Consultant(s) that may be employed by the Consultant. Failure to begin and diligently prosecute the services as further described herein may be considered grounds for termination of the contract. It will be the Consultant's responsibility to obtain the necessary labor, materials, and/or sub -consultant resources to complete the assignment(s). If any person employed by the Consultant, or employed as a sub- Consultant, should fail or refuse to carry out the work or shall appear to be incompetent or to act in a disorderly manner, he/she shall be discharged immediately upon the request of the Commission and such person shall not again be employed for any of the services required for the Commission. The Consultant is responsible for determining the correct number of personnel (estimated at 4 plus a foreman), labor classifications, and equipment necessary to complete the work. 3.1 Key Personnel The Consultant shall provide resumes of proposed qualified staff and references, as indicated. 3.2 Project Manager r)„riP-z- Plans, directs, and coordinates the activities of the Consultant (including all sub - Consultants) in performance of the Services to assure compliance with Agreement terms and conditions, applicable regulations, Commission standards, and budgets. Ensures maintenance activities are in line with Commission objectives. Identifies and reports changes that impact scope. Schedules project work and milestons. Ensures work complies with quality control standards. Evaluates risk probabilities and impacts. Identifies and Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 communicates contingency plans. Develops time, cost, and resource estimates. Delivers project objectives within time, cost, and resource estimates. Develops a quality management plan. Communicates risks and possible outcomes to the Commission's project manager. Serves as the point of contact for the Commission staff for all matters relating to the Agreement. Reviews, annual budget and work plan, training schedule, invoices. Supervises, promotes, manages, transfers, and disciplines Consultant staff and arranges with the Commission for replacement personnel in the event of vacancies. Minimum Requirements: • Desire 10 years' experience in supervising or directing the work of others engaged in railroad right of way maintenance and five years' experience in managing construction and/or maintenance. • Knowledge of 49 CFR 214 Subpart C-Roadway Worker Protection and SCRRA'S MAINTENANCE OF WAY OPERATING RULES and INSTRUCTIONS and all safety requirements. Must be qualified (under all SCRRA applicable rules and regulations) as an Employee -In -Charge (EIC). • Knowledge of the safe and proper procedures for maintenance within operating railroad environment. • Knowledge of the safe and proper procedures hand and power tools maintenance equipment. • Must be able to demonstrate ability to communicate in written and verbal English language with prior record keeping experience. 3.3 Supervisor/Foreman Tlnti ee Foreman is required to assist and coordinate the activities of the right of way maintenance crew on the San Jacinto Branchline Subdivision, by arranging for the materials, tools, and equipment required for the maintenance services, arranging for protection of workplace, coordinating with other SCRRA Consultants, Metrolink Dispatch Operation Center (DOC), and affected public agencies, training employees in proper work methods, communicating with trains and DOC regarding train movements through the work area, inspecting work methods and site conditions for safety conditions and efficiency of use of labor and material, and preparing documentation of work performed and resources (labor, material, equipment, and supplies) used. Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 Minimum Requirements: • Desire three to five years of railroad right of way maintenance experience and/or construction including at least two years of experience in supervising or directing the work of others engaged in railroad right of way maintenance. • Must demonstrate previous experience and certification of 49 CRF 214 Subpart C- Roadway Worker Protection, 214.353 — Training and qualification of roadway workers who provide on -track safety for roadway work -groups. • Must be able to meet the requirements of 49 CFR 214 Subpart C-Roadway Worker Protection, as well as SCRRA'S MAINTENANCE OF WAY OPERATING RULES and INSTRUCTIONS. Must be qualified (under all SCRRA applicable rules and regulations) as an EIC. • Must be able to demonstrate ability to communicate in written and verbal English language with prior record keeping experience. • Ability to work outdoors in all weather conditions, to lift objects weighing a minimum of 50 pounds and must have the ability to distinguish colors and to hear warning signals and radio and telephone devices. • Knowledge of the safe and proper procedures for operating maintenance hand and power tools. 3.4 Equipment Operator Duties: Operates and performs operator -level duties of smaller equipment and rubber tired off - equipment such as a backhoe, skip loaders, and skid steers. May work as a member of a crew or independently. Minimum Requirements: • Desire one to three years' experience in the operation of rubber -tired equipment used in the course of railroad maintenance and/or construction. Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 " Must be able to meet the requirements of 49 CFR 214 Subpart C-Roadway Worker Protection, as well as SCRRA'S MAINTENANCE OF WAY OPERATING RULES and INSTRUCTIONS. " Any operator working independently must be qualified (under all SCRRA applicable rules and regulations) as an EIC. " Knowledge of safe and proper procedures for operating this equipment " Ability to work outdoors in all weather conditions, to lift objects weighing a minimum of 50 pounds and must have the ability to distinguish colors and to hear warning signals and radio and telephone devices. " Ability to communicate in the written and verbal English language. 3.5 EIC/Flagman Duties: Provides protection for the work activities of other parties engaged in work on the railroad right of way by performing safety briefings and issuing instructions to these parties, coordinating this work with the DOC, communicating by radio with train operators to authorize train movement through work area, observing railroad tracks for approaching trains, issuing audible warnings to workers concerning the approach of trains, directing the discontinuance of specific work practices until after train(s) have passed work location, observing work practices of the other parties, observing the workplace for unsafe conditions, and installing and removing temporary signs for the control of train movements. Railroad Worker Protection Safety trained under SCRRA requirements. Minimum Requirements: " Preferred one-year experience providing on -track safety for roadway work groups. " Must demonstrate previous experience and certification of 49 CRF 214 Subpart C- Roadway Worker Protection, 214.353 Training and qualification of roadway workers who provide on -track safety for roadway work groups. " Must be able to meet the requirements of 49 CFR 214 Subpart C-Roadway Worker Protection, as well as SCRRA'S MAINTENANCE OF WAY OPERATING RULES and INSTRUCTIONS. Must be qualified (under all SCRRA applicable rules and regulations) as an EIC. " Ability to work outdoors in all weather conditions, to lift objects weighing a Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 minimum of 50 pounds and must have the ability to distinguish colors and to hear warning signals and radio and telephone devices. • Ability to communicate in the written and verbal English language. 3.6 Qualifications applicable to all positions Minimum Requirements: • Must meet all SCRRA's safety training requirements and maintain certifications. • Able to communicate in written and verbal English language. Required to pass pre- employment physical examination which includes blood and/or urine testing. • Ability to work outdoors in all weather conditions, to lift objects weighing a minimum of 50 lbs. and must have the ability to distinguish colors and to hear warning signals and radio and telephone devices. • The appropriate licensing; professional experience, academic training, and technical skills for the assigned work Training; All Consultant and sub -Consultant employees, working on the ROW, are required to complete railroad safety training, (to be provided by the Commission one time annually) wear all applicable, personal protection safety equipment, and at all times follow all railroad safety rules. The Commission will provide initial SCRRA required safety training for staff identified in the proposal. Any employee that fails to meet the standards shall not be approved for work on Commission owned operating right of ways, under this contract. 4. Work Plan The Consultant shall establish, develop, maintain and implement a work plan that; provides an organizational chart of the project team and identifies their respective responsibilities; identifies all resources necessary to complete the work; identifies any resources provided by sub - Consultants; and any outlines management tools that will be utilized to manage the work. 4.1 Quality Control Plan (QCP) Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 The Quality Control Plan should include management's role and commitment to quality work, while optimizing cost and schedule performance. It shall describe implementation of policies, procedures and processes that ensure work is performed to the specifications, including a corrective action plan should corrections be necessary, and the methods in place to ensure non - recurrence. 4.2 Workmanship Consultant agrees to provide adequate supervision, and take necessary measures to assure that all projects are completed in a workmanlike manner. Consultant agrees to perform the work assigned under this contract in a workmanlike manner by qualified, careful and efficient workers and agrees to perform such work in strict accordance with all Task Order and specifications and any changes, modifications or amplifications thereof. I n the event of substandard workmanship or defective materials furnished by the consultant as may be determined by inspection of the Commission or in the event of poor working performance as may be determined by the Commission's designated project manager, the Commission may at any time, require the consultant to expeditiously remedy such failure or defect, at no cost to the Commission. Workmanship may be determined to be substandard if the work is incomplete, inadequately installed or supported, poorly fitted or sealed, damaged, improperly finished, or installed in a manner that the operation or the maintainability of the installation is impaired beyond the limits specified or indicated by the agreement. Poor working performance will be determined to exist if any of the consultants' workers fail to perform work within the time allocated to do so in the time period specified in a particular Task Order. In certain work, particularly emergency work, the consultant will be expected to perform the work as expeditiously as possible, with a crew sized to ensure each worker has tasks to perform and with as little lost time as allowed by conditions. Claims of defective materials, inadequate workmanship or poor working performance will be first made to the consultant's job site foreman. In the event the situation cannot be remedied at the job site, a written claim will be made to the consultant's home office. Consultant shall resolve all claims against workmanship or work performance by issuing a credit to the Commission for the work performed. The amount of the credit will be determined in negotiation between the consultant and the Commission. Payments otherwise due may be withheld, in whole or in part, by the Commission on account of defective materials and/or unresolved workmanship issues. Consultant shall employ only competent, careful and orderly employees. If the Commission determines that an employee is detrimental to the performance of the work, not qualified to perform the assigned work or guilty of improper conduct, the Commission may require removal of such employee. The performance of services by the consultant shall not relieve the consultant from any Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate, or defective work at no further cost to the Commission, when such inaccuracies are due to the acts or omissions, negligent or otherwise, of the Consultant. Consultant will not substitute any employee for another unless both have been trained equally, and at such time still current within such training. Training costs due to employee changes, requested by Consultant, will be at the Consultant's expense. Consultant shall confine the storage of materials and operations of its workers, vehicles and equipment to limits prescribed by law, ordinances, permits and the directions of the Commission's designated project manager and, upon completion of work for the Commission, Consultant shall leave the work and premises in a condition satisfactory to the Commission's project manager. 4.3 Non -Conforming Work The Commission may reduce payment for any of the following; non -compliant work, noncompliant work left in place; corrective work or unauthorized work. 4.4 Emergency Work Consultant and sub -Consultants must have 24-hour contact number(s) and an acceptable means of emergency "on -call" communication with the Commission's Project Manager. Four (4) hour response time may be required in cases of emergency and within one (1) hour in cases where train operations are halted. 4.5 Unsafe Conditions Consultant and or its sub -Consultant are to immediately notify the Commission's Project Manager of any unsafe or questionable condition that exists on the right of way. Project Manager will then notify the necessary parties. If the condition poses immediate danger to rail operations, the Consultant shall notify the DOC, then the Commission's Project Manager. 4.6 Existing Field Conditions Commission -owned property, while primarily vacant, may be located adjacent to existing residential and commercial developments. The consultant shall be required to act aggressively in mitigating maintenance activity that may adversely affect these existing residential and commercial areas. The consultant shall be required to comply with the relevant Municipal Codes and City Ordinances with respect to work hours, noise, dust and Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 other activities which adversely affect the public. The consultant shall not impede access to the existing street and residences. The consultant shall preserve and protect from damage all existing monuments, utilities, structures, and hardscape. The consultant shall be responsible for damages caused by its operations. In the event that damage does occur, the cost of repairs shall be paid by the consultant at no cost to the Commission. Any concerns expressed by consultant, adjacent property owners or government officials regarding acceptable conditions or procedures on Commission -owned property will be resolved by consultation with the Commission's designated project manager, prior to work starting. 5. Subconsultants The Commission reserves the right to approve subconsultants selected by the consultant prior to execution of work. Consultant shall notify the Commission's designated Project Manager in writing of the names of all proposed subconsultants, together with a summary of the extent and character of the work to be done by each subconsultant. Subcontracting by subconsultants shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the contract. Nothing contained in the agreement or a particular Task Order shall create any contractual relationship between a subconsultant and the Commission. 6. Schedule The Consultant shall submit a weekly schedule each Friday, for anticipated work to be performed by following week including location by mile post (MP). Any deviations must be discussed and approved by the Commission's Project Manager. Consultant and/or sub -Consultant shall respond and perform non -emergency as -needed work request from the Commission's Project Manager within one (1) working day, except in cases of emergency, where an immediate response may be requested. Unless directed otherwise, work schedule shall be during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday). Except in cases of emergency, overtime must be approved by the Commission's Project Manager. Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 6.1 Weekly Report Consultant will email the Commission's Project Manager a weekly progress report. This report will include type of work completed by location, personnel and equipment used, and other direct cost. In additional a narrative shall be provided that summarizes the weekly activities and note any pending or urgent issues. 6.2 Monthly Report In addition to the terms of the Agreement, Consultant shall submit a monthly report to include; Provide daily work reports as back-up to invoices submitted for payment; • Itemization of the materials used and corresponding vendor's invoice copies; • Direct cost of labor; • Equipment rental charges; • Workers' certified payrolls; • Equipment used; size, type and identification number. Attach a summary sheet for the hours expended for each task for each month and total project to date 7. Equipment The Consultant's equipment shall be in good repair and able to operate efficiently and safely. All equipment used in the performance of this contract shall be in operable condition and meet the local, state and federal safety requirements. All equipment used shall be inspected and serviced regularly. The inspection and service records shall be available upon request. All vehicles shall be registered, licensed, insured and operated by a licensed driver. All vehicles shall follow laws regarding parking, driving, and licensing. The Consultant's equipment shall have the proper safety devices maintained at all times while in use. If equipment does not contain proper safety devices and/or is being operated in an unsafe manner, the Commission's Project Manager shall direct the Consultant to remove such Equipment and/or operation until the deficiency is corrected to the satisfaction of the Commission's Project Manager. The Commission's Project Manager may inspect the Consultant's equipment and tools at any time. The daily anticipated equipment necessary to perform this work, but not limited Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 to; • One (1) Foreman/supervisor pick-up truck. • One (1) Crew truck. • One (1) truck with automatic dumping capability with a minimum hauling capacity of 6 cubic yards. • Hand and power tools consisting of weed trimmers, chain and pole saws, hedge trimmer, but not limited to; with a value of $500.00, shall be considered part of the Consultant's overhead cost. • The anticipated heavy equipment necessary to perform this work including, but not limited to the following; ■ Backhoe ■ Dozer-D4 or equal ■ Skip loader with a 4 in 1 bucket ■ Street sweeper, and skid steer with attachments Unless equipment rates are specifically identified in the Agreement, reimbursement for equipment rental will be either at the CALTRANS published rates within "Labor Surcharge and Equipment Rental Rates" or the actual rental rate, whichever is less. Equipment rental payment is full compensation for rental equipment costs, including moving rental equipment to and from the site using its own power. For rental equipment that cannot be transported economically using its own power, no transport cost will be paid. 8. Notifications and Response Time(s) Consultant and sub -consultants must provide the Commission with 24-hour contact number(s) for consultant's key personnel and an acceptable means of emergency "on -call" communication with the Commission's designated project manager. Consultant's offices must have voice, fax and e-mail capability. The Commission's Project Manager must be notified when consultant and or its subconsultant has employees on Commission -owned property, at times other than regularly Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 scheduled work times. Consultant and/or its subconsultant are to immediately notify the Commission's Project Manager of any unsafe or questionable condition that exists on the property. The designated Commission Project Manager will then notify the necessary parties. It is the consultant's responsibility to notify the Commission's Project Manager of work completion within twenty-four (24) hours of completion of each Task Order. If applicable, the consultant will be responsible for any notification requirements that may be brought about as a result of soil disturbance (Dig Alert, etc.). 9. Additional Work Material changes that require Consultant to perform work that is outside the Scope of Work shall be deemed to be Additional Work. Consultant shall not be obligated to perform any Additional Work without its prior written consent to the nature and extent of the Additional Work and the terms upon which the Additional Work shall be performed. Additional work shall not be limited to the railroad right of way and may be requested at any property to which the Commission has property rights. COMMIMSSION/PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROVAL: PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE Completion of a specific Task Order is established when Consultant provides before and after photos of sites cleared/cleaned/abated with each invoice. Before and after any parcel or combination of adjoining parcels is abated, the Consultant shall take clear and concise pictures of the area demonstrating need for abatement. Each "after" picture shall be taken from the SAME location as the "before" picture REFERENCING SOME OUTSTANDING LANDMARK. These pictures will be taken immediately "before" and "after" abatement work is done and submitted to the Commission with the applicable invoice. ➢ IF PICTURES DO NOT SHOW JUSTIFICATION OF CHARGE, payment will not be made. ➢ Each picture shall include time and date picture was taken and the parcel number or numbers it represents. ➢ CONSULTANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH THE DIGITAL CAMERA. PHOTOS WILL BE PROVIDED BY EMAIL AND INCLUDED IN THE INVOICE. RECORDS AND AUDIT Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 Consultant(s) shall maintain records and books of account showing all costs and expenses incurred by the consultant for the contract. The Commission shall have the right, upon reasonable notice, to audit the books, records, documents, and other evidence and the accounting procedures and practices, where needed, to verify the costs and expenses claimed. The Commission retains this right for at least three years after final payment and until all disputes, appeals, litigation, or claims have been resolved. This right to audit shall also include inspection at reasonable times of the consultant's office or facilities which are engaged in the performance of the contract. In addition, the consultant shall, at no cost or expense to the Commission, furnish reasonable facilities and assistance for such an audit. Audit findings shall, to the extent allowed by law, be treated by the Commission as confidential. Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 *INSERT ROW MAP* END OF STATEMENT OF WORK Exhibit A 17336.00603\29843082.2 AGENDA ITEM 8P RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Mark Lancaster, Right of Way Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Donation Agreements to Transfer Mitigation Property to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Donation Agreement No. 18-72-106-00 between the Commission and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) granting land acquired for mitigation purposes on the SR-79 Realignment project; and 2) Approve Donation Agreement No. 18-73-105-00 between the Commission and RCA granting land acquired for mitigation purposes on the Mid County Parkway (MCP) project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) is a large- scale conservation effort designed to meet the requirements of the Federal and State Endangered Species Acts — laws enacted to protect plants and animals at risk of extinction. The MSHCP protects 146 species, conserves 500,000 acres of open space and provides environmental clearance for future homes, schools, businesses, and freeways. However, not all species are included in the MSCHP, particularly water resources and their respective habitats. Impacts to non -covered species will require conservation by purchasing properties from willing sellers. RCA was created in 2004 to achieve the environmental efforts outlined in the MSHCP. Once land is acquired, it must be managed correctly to ensure species can flourish. RCA's main responsibilities include: performing baseline assessments, maintenance, fire prevention, maintaining the habitats in similar or better condition than when acquired, and controlling unauthorized public access. Agenda Item 813 445 DISCUSSION: The Commission acquired three parcels in December 2017 as mitigation for the SR-79 Realignment project. The southern portion of this project is covered in the MSHCP; however, the northern segment is not. The three parcels are comprised of 33-acres that partially satisfy the mitigation requirement for vernal pools in the northern segment and is the subject of Donation Agreement No. 18-72-106-00. The Commission also acquired one parcel in March 2018 as mitigation for the MCP. While the MCP is included in the MSHCP, certain species and their respective habitats are not. This 33-acre property completes the requirement to mitigate for the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat and is the subject of Donation Agreement No. 18-73-105-00. Satisfying the mitigation requirements for both projects continues to be an on -going process (see table below) and, once complete, will allow the Commission to proceed to construction when ready. The properties are ready to be transferred to RCA for continued conservation management in perpetuity. Project Total Acreage Required Total Acreage Acquired Acreage Remaining SR-79 Realignment 234 33 201 MCP 171 162 9 There is no financial impact related to the donation of these properties, as the Commission expended $4,788,000 in the aggregate to initially acquire these properties. Staff recommends the Executive Director be authorized to execute Agreement Nos. 18-72-106- 00 and 18-73-105-00 between the Commission and RCA. Attachments: 1) Draft Agreement 18-72-106-00 2) Draft Agreement 18-73-105-00 Agenda Item 813 446 ATTACHMENT 1 Project: RCTC Dilworth Donation APN: 465-030-004, 465-030-022, 465-030-029 DONATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made this day of , 2018 by and between the WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY, a public agency and a joint powers authority, herein called "RCA," and the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, a public agency of the State of California and a county transportation commission, herein called "Donor." RCA and Donor are sometimes individually referred to as "Party" and collectively as "Parties." WHEREAS, Donor has acquired for mitigation purposes related to the State Route 79 Realignment Project ("Project"), and is the owner of certain real property located in Riverside County, and as more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Property"); WHEREAS, RCA desires to own and manage the Property for resource conservation purposes, including for the purposes of wildlife and plant life conservation pursuant to the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan ("MSHCP"); NOW, THEREFORE, RCA and Donor agree as follows: 1. Dedication of Property. Donor shall offer to dedicate the Property to RCA and RCA shall accept the offer of dedication of the Property, or interest therein, upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. 2. Obligations of Donor. 2.1 Fee Interest. Upon acceptance by RCA, Donor shall convey, assign and transfer its fee interest in the Property to RCA, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, easements, leases (recorded or unrecorded), bonds, assessments, and taxes except for (i) liens for non -delinquent property taxes and assessments, and (ii) those liens and encumbrances and easements which, in the sole discretion of RCA, are acceptable pursuant to Section 6. 2.2 Representations and Warranties of Donor. Donor represents and warrants to RCA that as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Close of Escrow: 2.2.1 Hazardous Substances. The Property is: (i) free from Hazardous Substances; (ii) contains no buried or partially buried storage tanks located on the Property; (iii) has not been used for the generation, storage or disposal of any Hazardous Substance and no Hazardous Substance has been spilled, disposed of, or stored on, under, or at the Property; and (iv) has never been used as a dump or landfill; 2.2.2 Compliance with Law. To the knowledge of Donor, the Property is in material compliance with all applicable Laws and Environmental Laws; 26493.00487\30464933.4 -1- 447 2.2.3 Leases. No leases, licenses, or other agreements allowing any third party rights to use the Property are or will be in force as of the Closing; 2.2.4 Litigation and Investigations. To the knowledge of Donor, there is no pending or threatened litigation, administrative proceeding, or other legal or governmental action with respect to the Property, and Donor has received no written notice, warning, administrative complaint, judicial complaint, or other formal or informal notice alleging that conditions on the Property are or have been in violation of any Laws or Environmental Laws, or informing Donor that the Property is subject to investigation or inquiry regarding the violation of any Laws or Environmental Laws. 2.2.5 Condition of Property. There are no natural or artificial conditions upon the Property or any part of the Property that could result in a material and adverse change in the condition of the Property; 2.2.6 No Insolvency Proceedings. Donor has not (i) made a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; (ii) filed any voluntary petition in bankruptcy or suffered the filing of any involuntary petition by its creditors; (iii) suffered the appointment of a receiver to take possession of all or substantially all of its assets; (iv) suffered the attachment or other judicial seizure of substantially all of its assets; or (v) admitted in writing its inability to pay its debts as they come due. 2.2.7 No Other Agreements, Undertakings or Tenancies. Donor will not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of RCA. 2.2.8 Disclosure. Donor has disclosed to RCA all information, records, and studies in Donor's possession in connection with the Property, including any reports or studies concerning Hazardous Substances. All information that Donor has delivered to RCA, either directly or through Donor's agents, is accurate and Donor has disclosed all material facts concerning the operation, development, or condition of the Property. Donor shall promptly notify RCA of any facts that would cause any of the representations contained in this Agreement to be untrue as of the Close of Escrow. If RCA reasonably concludes that a fact materially and adversely affects the Property, RCA shall have the option to terminate this Agreement by delivering written notice to Donor and Escrow Agent. If RCA terminates this Agreement pursuant to this Section, Escrow Agent shall cancel the Escrow and Donor shall be responsible for all costs of escrow. 2.3 Indemnity. Donor agrees to indemnify RCA and agrees to defend and hold RCA harmless from all loss, cost, liability, expense, damage, or other injury, including without limitation, attorneys' fees and expenses, to the fullest extent not prohibited by applicable law, and all other costs and expenses incurred by reason of, or in any manner resulting from (i) the breach of any warranties and representations in Section 2.2, and (ii) all third -party claims for Donor's intentional acts or willful misconduct related to the Property occurring prior to the Close of Escrow. 26493.00487\30464933.4 -2- ., 2.4 Definitions. 2.4.1 "Environmental Laws" means all federal, state, local, or municipal laws, rules, orders, regulations, statutes, ordinances, codes, decrees, or requirements of any government authority regulating, relating to, or imposing liability or standards of conduct concerning any Hazardous Substance (as defined subsequently in this Agreement), or pertaining to occupational health or industrial hygiene (and only to the extent that the occupational health or industrial hygiene laws, ordinances, or regulations relate to Hazardous Substances on, under, or about the Property), occupational or environmental conditions on, under, or about the Property, as now in effect, including without limitation, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) [42 U.S.C.A. §§ 9601 et seq.]; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) and the Solid Waste Disposal Act [42 U.S.C.A. §§ 6901 et seq.]; the Clean Water Act, also known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) [33 U.S.C.A. §§ 1251 et seq.]; the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) [15 U.S.C.A. §§ 2601 et seq.]; the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA) [49 U.S.C.A. §§ 1801 et seq.]; the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) [7 U.S.C.A. §§ 136 et seq.]; the Clean Air Act (CAA) [42 U.S.C.A. §§ 7401 et seq.]; the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) [42 U.S.C.A. §§ 300f et seq.]; the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA) [30 U.S.C.A. §§ 1201 et seq.]; the Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA or EPCRTKA) [42 U.S.C.A. §§ 11001 et seq.]; the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA) [29 U.S.C.A. §§ 655, 657]; the California laws regarding the underground storage of hazardous substances [H & S C §§ 25280 et seq.]; the Hazardous Substance Account Act [H & S C §§ 25300 et seq.]; the California laws regarding hazardous waste control [H & S C §§ 25100 et seq.]; the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 [H & S C §§ 25249.5 et seq.]; the Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act [Wat C §§ 13000 et seq.], and any amendments of or regulations promulgated under the statutes cited above and any other federal, state, or local law, statute, ordinance, or regulation now in effect that pertains to occupational health or industrial hygiene, and only to the extent that the occupational health or industrial hygiene laws, ordinances, or regulations relate to Hazardous Substances on, under, or about the Property, or the regulation or protection of the environment, including ambient air, soil, soil vapor, groundwater, surface water, or land use. 2.4.2 "Hazardous Substances" includes without limitation: (i) Those substances included within the definitions of "hazardous substance," "hazardous waste " "hazardous material," "toxic substance," "solid waste," or "pollutant or contaminant" in CERCLA, RCRA, TSCA, HMTA, or under any other Environmental Law; (ii) Those substances listed in the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) Table [49 CFR 172.101], or by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), or any successor agency, as hazardous substances [40 CFR Part 302]; (iii) Other substances, materials, and wastes that are or become regulated or classified as hazardous or toxic under federal, state, or local laws or regulations; and 26493.00487\30464933.4 -3- 449 (iv) Any material, waste, or substance that is: a petroleum or refined petroleum product, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyl, designated as a hazardous substance pursuant to 33 U.S.C.A. § 1321 or listed pursuant to 33 U.S.C.A. § 1317, a flammable explosive, or a radioactive material. 3. Escrow. By this Agreement, RCA and Donor establish an escrow ("Escrow") with a reputable title company chosen by RCA (the "Escrow Agent"), subject to the provisions of the standard conditions for acceptance of escrow and the terms and conditions in this Agreement, with a signed counterpart of this document to be delivered as escrow instructions to Escrow Agent. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the standard conditions for acceptance of escrow, the terms of this Agreement shall control. RCA's agent for matters related to the Closing of Escrow shall be the Executive Director or his designee. 4. Feasibility Period. 4.1 During the period commencing on the date of this Agreement and terminating on a date which is sixty (60) days from the date of this Agreement ("Feasibility Period"), RCA may undertake at RCA's expense an inspection of the Property. Said inspection may include: (i) a review of the physical condition of the Property, including but not limited to, inspection and examination of soils, environmental factors, Hazardous Substances, if any, and archeological information relating to the Property; and (ii) a review and investigation of the effect of any zoning, maps, permits, reports, engineering data, regulations, ordinances, and laws affecting the Property. Within ten (10) days following the full execution of this Agreement by both parties, Donor shall deliver to RCA copies of all architectural plans, surveys, specifications, and other documents pertaining to the physical, geological, or environmental condition of the Property that are owned by or in the possession of Donor. 4.2 If RCA's environmental consultant requires additional time to determine the existence and extent of any Hazardous Substances on the Property, RCA shall have the right, exercisable by delivering written notice to Donor prior to the expiration of the Feasibility Period, to extend the Feasibility Period for up to an additional sixty (60) days to complete the testing. 4.3 If RCA disapproves of the results of the inspection and review or the results of any Phase I Environmental Report, RCA may elect, prior to the last day of the Feasibility Period (or any extension thereof), to terminate this Agreement by giving Donor written notification prior to the last day of the Feasibility Period (or any extension thereof). If RCA fails to properly notify Donor of the intent to terminate this Agreement, RCA shall be deemed to be satisfied with the results of the inspection and shall be deemed to have waived the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this provision. 5. Access. 5.1 Access to the Property during the Feasibility Period shall be given to RCA, its agents, employees, or contractors during normal business hours upon at least one (1) business days' notice to Donor, at RCA's own cost and risk, for any purposes, including, but not limited to, inspecting the Property, taking samples of the soil, and conducting an environmental 26493.00487\30464933.4 -4- 450 audit (including an investigation of past and current uses of the Property). RCA shall indemnify and defend Donor against and hold Donor harmless from all losses, costs, damages, liabilities, and expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney fees arising out of RCA's entry onto the Property or any activity thereon by RCA or its agents, employees, or contractors prior to the Close of Escrow except to the extent any such losses, costs, damages, liabilities, and expenses arise out of the gross negligence or willful acts of Donor. Any entry onto the Property by RCA or its agents, employees, or contractors shall be at reasonable times. The provisions of this Section shall survive the Close of Escrow. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, RCA and Donor agree that RCA shall not incur any liability hereunder merely by the discovery of an "Existing Adverse Condition" (as defined below) regardless of whether such Existing Adverse Condition, once revealed, negatively impacts the value of the Property or otherwise causes Donor to incur liabilities, costs or expenses. The term "Existing Adverse Condition' shall mean an adverse condition existing on or with respect to the Property that is discovered or revealed by RCA in the course of its Property inspection hereunder. 5.2 In addition to the provisions of Section 4.1, RCA and its agents, employees, or contractors shall have the right, from the date of this Agreement until the Closing Date, to contact any federal, state, or local governmental authority or agency to investigate any matters relating to the Property. Donor agrees to cooperate reasonably with RCA and its agents, employees, or contractors in the inspection of the Property and agrees to deliver to RCA all information in Donor's possession or control pertaining to the condition of the Property, including engineering and environmental reports, studies, tests, monitoring results, and related documentation. 6. Title. 6.1 Immediately following the execution of this Agreement by both Parties, RCA shall cause Escrow Agent to issue to RCA (with a copy to Donor) a preliminary report for an ALTA Standard Policy of Title Insurance, setting forth all liens, encumbrances, easements, restrictions, conditions, pending litigation, judgments, administrative proceedings, and other matters affecting Donor's title to the Property ("Preliminary Report"), together with copies of all documents relating to title exceptions referred to in the Preliminary Report. 6.2 Donor agrees to deliver to RCA, promptly following the full execution and delivery of this Agreement, copies of any survey of the Property in the possession of Donor. 6.3 RCA shall approve or disapprove, in writing to Donor with a copy to Escrow Agent, each exception shown on the Preliminary Report (each an "Exception') within twenty (20) business days following the receipt of the Preliminary Report. RCA's failure to object within the twenty (20) day period shall be deemed to be a disapproval of the Exceptions. The Exceptions approved by RCA hereunder shall be referred to as the "Approved Exceptions." 6.4 If any Exception is disapproved or deemed disapproved (each a "Disapproved Exception'), Donor shall have the right, but not the obligation, within thirty (30) days following expiration of the twenty (20) day period provided under Section 6.3 above, to cause each Disapproved Exception to be discharged, satisfied, released, or terminated, as the 26493.00487\30464933.4 -5- 451 case may be, of record, and in a form that is reasonably satisfactory to RCA and Escrow Agent, all at Donor's sole cost and expense. Donor agrees to deposit into Escrow the sum sufficient to discharge any Disapproved Exception that may be discharged only by the payment of money. If Donor is unable or unwilling to obtain a discharge, satisfaction, release, or termination of any Disapproved Exception within the period specified above, then this Agreement shall automatically terminate ten (10) business days after expiration of the 30-day period for curing the Disapproved Exceptions or after Donor advises RCA in writing that Donor is unable or unwilling to cause such discharge, satisfaction, release, or termination, whichever occurs first, unless within such 10-business-day period RCA waives in writing such Disapproved Exception, in which event such Disapproved Exception shall be deemed an Approved Exception under this Agreement. If this Agreement terminates pursuant to the foregoing sentence, then Donor shall pay all charges of the Escrow Agent in connection with this transaction, including the charges of the surveyor and environmental engineering company; and the Parties shall be relieved of all further obligations and liabilities to each other under this Agreement except as otherwise provided herein, and all funds and documents deposited with Escrow Agent shall be promptly refunded or returned, as the case may be, by Escrow Agent to the depositing Party. Anything above to the contrary notwithstanding, it is understood and agreed that RCA's indemnity obligations under Section 5 shall not terminate upon termination of this Agreement pursuant to this or any other provision hereof. 7. Close of Escrow. 7.1 Title. Simultaneously with the Close of Escrow, Escrow Agent shall issue an ALTA Standard Policy of Title Insurance (formerly referred to as a CLTA Title Policy) ("Title Policy"), subject only to (i) liens for real property taxes, bonds, and assessments not then due, and (ii) the Approved Exceptions. 7.2 Donor's Deposits into Escrow. Donor shall deposit with Escrow Agent on or prior to the Close of Escrow the following documents: (i) a grant deed in the form attached hereto as Exhibit `B" executed and acknowledged by Donor, conveying to RCA good and marketable fee simple title to the Property, subject only to the Approved Exceptions ("Deed"); (ii) Donor's affidavit of nonforeign status as contemplated by Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("FIRPTA Affidavit"); (iii) all funds required to be placed in escrow by Donor; and (iv) Donor's approval of the draft of Escrow Agent's closing statement. 7.3 RCA's Deposits into Escrow. RCA's approval of the draft of Escrow Agent's closing statement. 7.4 Closing Date. The conveyance of the Property to RCA and the closing of this transaction ("Close of Escrow") shall take place within one hundred twenty (120) days 26493.00487\30464933.4 -6- 452 ("Closing Date") following the establishment of an Escrow pursuant to Section 3 of this Agreement. 7.5 Closing Statements. No more than two days prior to the Closing Date, Escrow Agent shall deliver to RCA and to Donor, for their respective approvals, drafts of Escrow Agent's closing statement showing all receipts and disbursements of the Escrow. 7.6 Closing Instructions. On the Closing Date (or any extension thereof), Escrow Agent shall close Escrow as follows: Riverside County Recorder; (i) record the Deed (marked for return to RCA) with the (ii) issue the Title Policy; (iii) prorate taxes, assessments, rents, and other charges, if any; (iv) prepare and deliver to both RCA and Donor one signed copy of Escrow Agent's closing statement showing all receipts and disbursements of the Escrow; (v) deliver to RCA the FIRPTA Affidavit, and the Withholding Affidavit; and (vi) If Escrow Agent is unable to simultaneously perform all of the instructions set forth above, Escrow Agent shall notify RCA and Donor and retain all funds and documents pending receipt of further instructions jointly issued by RCA and Donor. 7.7 Closing Costs and Prorations. Donor shall pay the following closing costs and prorations through the Close of Escrow: (i) All governmental conveyancing fees and taxes due upon transfer of the Property, except that no documentary transfer tax will be payable with respect to this transaction, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11922; (ii) The recording charges in connection with recordation of the Deed; except that this Deed is entitled to be recorded without a fee pursuant to Government Code Section 27383 because the Deed is for the benefit of a public agency; and (iii) All charges in connection with issuance of the Title Policy; (iv) All fees and charges levied by Escrow Agent. 7.8 Real Estate Taxes, Bonds, and Assessments. RCA and Donor are each public agencies that are exempt from real property taxes and assessments. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in order to allocate the risk of which party is required to assume responsibility for any existing taxes that were assessed while the property was owned by a private party or as a result of an erroneous assessment, Donor shall be responsible for any bond, assessment, or past due 26493.00487\30464933.4 -7- 453 real property tax that constitutes a lien on the Property at the Closing and RCA will be responsible for any such item that is assessed following the Closing. 7.9 Possession. Possession of the Property shall be delivered to RCA at the Close of Escrow. 8. Acceptance. The acceptance of the Property by RCA and the Closing of Escrow (as defined in Section 8) are subject to the satisfaction of the following no later than the Closing Date: (i) RCA's approval of the condition of the Property as provided in Section 4 and title to the Property as provided in Section 6; (ii) The representations and warranties of Donor set forth in Section 2.2 shall be true and accurate as of the Closing Date; (iii) Donor's performance of all obligations under this Agreement; (iv) No adverse material change shall have occurred with respect to the condition of the Property from the end of the Feasibility Period through the Closing Date; and (v) Escrow Agent being prepared to issue the Title Policy on the Close of Escrow, subject only to the Approved Exceptions. 9. The performance by RCA of its obligations under this Agreement shall relieve RCA of any and all further obligations or claims on account of the acceptance of the offer of dedication. RCA agrees to use the Property for wetland mitigation purposes and for wildlife and plant habitat conservation pursuant to the MSHCP. 10. This Agreement and Escrow may be terminated by RCA upon three (3) days written notice to Donor and Escrow Agent if the conditions to closing set forth in Section 9 have not been fulfilled on or before the Closing Date. Upon termination by RCA pursuant to this Section 12, Donor shall be responsible for all costs and expenses of Escrow Agent. 11. As used in this Agreement, notice includes but is not limited to, the communication of any notice, request, demand, approval, statement, report, acceptance, consent, waiver and appointment. All notices must be in writing. Notice is given either (i) when delivered in person to the person or company intended named below; or (ii) when sent via reputable overnight courier (such as Federal Express), addressed by name and addressed to the 26493.00487\30464933.4 -8- 454 party or persons intended, as follows: To RCA: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 3403 Tenth Street, 320 Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Executive Director Phone: (951) 955-9700 To Donor: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, California 92502-2208 Attn: Executive Director Phone: (951) 787-7141 until such time as a party gives notice of the change of address in accordance with the terms of this section. 12. This Agreement shall not be changed, modified or amended except upon the written consent of the Parties hereto. 13. This Agreement is the result of negotiations between the Parties and is intended by the Parties to be a final expression of their understanding with respect to the matters herein contained. This Agreement supersedes any and all other prior agreements and understandings, oral or written, in connection therewith. No provision contained herein shall be construed against RCA solely because it prepared this Agreement in its executed form. 14. Donor, their assigns and successors in interest, shall be bound by all the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement, and all the parties thereto shall be jointly and severally liable thereunder. 15. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement or any other agreement between any of the Parties hereto, once the Property is conveyed to and accepted by RCA, RCA shall have no obligation to return the Property to the Donor under any circumstances, except in the sole and exclusive discretion of RCA. 16. Pursuant to RCA's Policies and Procedures for Execution of IRS Form 8283 for Bargain Sales and Donations, RCA agrees to cooperate with Donor to acknowledge receipt of the donation of the Property by signing Internal Revenue Form 8283 (Non -Cash Charitable Contributions) before the Close of Escrow and any other tax -related forms or documents reasonably requested by Donor and to return any such forms to Donor within thirty business (30) days after RCA's receipt of such forms from Donor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, RCA makes no representation or warranty to Donor regarding the tax attributes of this transaction, nor shall RCA endorse or otherwise acknowledge any valuation of the Property for tax purposes, it being understood that the Donor has obtained its own appraisals and tax advice for such purposes. 26493.00487\30464933.4 -9- 455 17. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts. Each shall be deemed an original and all, taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN THE WITNESS THEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly -authorized representatives on the date and year set forth below. Dated: "DONOR" RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, a public agency of the State of California Anne Mayer, Executive Director Dated: 2-6 . 2 n r 2 "RCA" WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY a public agency and a joint powers authty I I , Executi 26493.00487\30464933.4 -1 Q- 456 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (APNs 465-030-004, 465-030-022 and 465-030-029) ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A: THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/z OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LAND. APN: 465-030-029-7 PARCEL B: THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/z OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LAND. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A PUBLIC CORPORATION, BY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 25, 1960 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 74953, IN BOOK 2755, PAGE 486 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE METROPOLITAN WAFER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A PUBLIC CORPORATION, BY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 05, 1994 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 309241 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. APN: 465-030-004-4; 465-030-022-0 Exhibit A 26493.00487\30464933.4 457 Recorded at request of and return to: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 3403 Tenth Street, Suite 320 Riverside, CA 92501 Attention: Executive Director FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority, and is entitled to be recorded without fee. (Gov. Code, § 27383) (Space above this line reserved for Recorder's use) GRANT DEED PROJECT: STATE ROUTE 79 REALIGNMENT MITIGATION APN: 465-030-004, 465-030-022 and 465-030-029 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, a public agency of the State of California and a county transportation commission, herein called "Grantor", hereby GRANTS to WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY, a public agency and a joint powers authority ("Grantee"), the real property in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as: See Exhibit "1" attached hereto and made a part hereof IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Grant Deed as of the day of , 2018. GRANTOR: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, a public agency of the State of California Un Anne Mayer, Executive Director 26493.00487\30601665.1 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF On before me, , Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) 26493.00487\30601665.1 2 459 EXHIBIT 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (APNs 465-030-004, 465-030-022 and 465-030-029) ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A: THE SOUTH '/2 OF THE EAST '/2 OF THE WEST '/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST '/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LAND. APN: 465-030-029-7 PARCEL B: THE SOUTH '/2 OF THE WEST '/2 OF THE EAST '/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST '/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LAND. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A PUBLIC CORPORATION, BY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 25, 1960 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 74953, IN BOOK 2755, PAGE 486 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE METROPOLITAN WAFER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, A PUBLIC CORPORATION, BY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 05, 1994 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 309241 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. APN: 465-030-004-4; 465-030-022-0 26493.00487\30601665.1 Exhibit I o CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the real property conveyed by RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, on the Grant Deed dated , 2018, to the WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY (Grantee), is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of Grantee pursuant to authority conferred by Ordinance No. 08-01, as adopted by the Board of Directors on July 7, 2008, and the Grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: GRANTEE: WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY, a public agency By: Name: Its: 26493.00487\30601665.1 461 ATTACHMENT 2 Project: RCTC McAlister Donation APN: 553-220-023 DONATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made this . day of , 2018 by and between the WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY, a public agency and a joint powers authority, herein called "RCA," and the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, a public agency of the State of California and a county transportation commission, herein called "Donor." RCA and Donor are sometimes individually referred to as "Party" and collectively as "Parties." WHEREAS, Donor is the owner of certain real property located in Riverside County, and as more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto, but excluding a retained portion described and depicted in Exhibit B (the "Property"); WHEREAS, RCA desires to acquire the Property for purposes of wildlife and plant life conservation pursuant to the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan ("MSHCP"); and NOW, THEREFORE, RCA and Donor agree as follows: 1. Dedication of Property. Donor shall offer to dedicate the Property to RCA and RCA shall accept the offer of dedication of the Property, or interest therein, upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. 2. Obligations of Donor. 2.1 Fee Interest. Upon acceptance by RCA, Donor shall convey, assign and transfer its fee interest in the Property to RCA, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, easements, leases (recorded or unrecorded), bonds, assessments, and taxes except for (i) liens for non -delinquent property taxes and assessments, and (ii) those liens and encumbrances and easements which, in the sole discretion of RCA, are acceptable pursuant to Section 6. 2.2 Representations and Warranties of Donor. Donor represents and warrants to RCA that as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Close of Escrow: 2.2.1 Hazardous Substances. The Property is: (i) free from Hazardous Substances; (ii) contains no buried or partially buried storage tanks located on the Property; (iii) has not been used for the generation, storage or disposal of any Hazardous Substance and no Hazardous Substance has been spilled, disposed of, or stored on, under, or at the Property; and (iv) has never been used as a dump or landfill; 2.2.2 Compliance with Law. To the knowledge of Donor, the Property is in material compliance with all applicable Laws and Environmental Laws; -1- 462 2.2.3 Leases. No leases, licenses, or other agreements allowing any third party rights to use the Property are or will be in force as of the Closing; 2.2.4 Litigation and Investigations. To the knowledge of Donor, there is no pending or threatened litigation, administrative proceeding, or other legal or governmental action with respect to the Property, and Donor has received no notice, warning, administrative complaint, judicial complaint, or other formal or informal notice alleging that conditions on the Property are or have been in violation of any Laws or Environmental Laws, or informing Donor that the Property is subject to investigation or inquiry regarding the violation of any Laws or Environmental Laws. 2.2.5 Condition of Property. There are no natural or artificial conditions upon the Property or any part of the Property that could result in a material and adverse change in the condition of the Property; 2.2.6 Access to the Property. There is vehicular access to the Property either directly through a public right of way or through a recorded easement; and 2.2.7 No Insolvency Proceedings. Donor has not (i) made a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; (ii) filed any voluntary petition in bankruptcy or suffered the filing of any involuntary petition by its creditors; (iii) suffered the appointment of a receiver to take possession of all or substantially all of its assets; (iv) suffered the attachment or other judicial seizure of substantially all of its assets; or (v) admitted in writing its inability to pay its debts as they come due. 2.2.8 No Other Agreements, Undertakings or Tenancies. Donor will not enter into any agreements or undertake any new obligations prior to Close of Escrow which will in any way burden, encumber or otherwise affect the Property without the prior written consent of RCA. 2.2.9 Disclosure. Donor has disclosed to RCA all information, records, and studies in Donor's possession in connection with the Property, including any reports or studies concerning Hazardous Substances. All information that Donor has delivered to RCA, either directly or through Donor's agents, is accurate and Donor has disclosed all material facts concerning the operation, development, or condition of the Property. Donor shall promptly notify RCA of any facts that would cause any of the representations contained in this Agreement to be untrue as of the Close of Escrow. If RCA reasonably concludes that a fact materially and adversely affects the Property, RCA shall have the option to terminate this Agreement by delivering written notice to Donor and Escrow Agent. If RCA terminates this Agreement pursuant to this Section, Escrow Agent shall cancel the Escrow and Donor shall be responsible for all costs of escrow. 2.3 Indemnity. Donor agrees to indemnify RCA and agrees to defend and hold RCA harmless from all loss, cost, liability, expense, damage, or other injury, including without limitation, attorneys' fees and expenses, to the fullest extent not prohibited by applicable law, and all other costs and expenses incurred by reason of, or in any manner resulting from (i) the breach of any warranties and representations in Section 2.2, and (ii) all third -party claims for -2- 463 Donor's intentional acts or willful misconduct related to the Property occurring prior to the Close of Escrow. 2.4 Definitions. 2.4.1 "Environmental Laws" means all federal, state, local, or municipal laws, rules, orders, regulations, statutes, ordinances, codes, decrees, or requirements of any government authority regulating, relating to, or imposing liability or standards of conduct concerning any Hazardous Substance (as defined subsequently in this Agreement), or pertaining to occupational health or industrial hygiene (and only to the extent that the occupational health or industrial hygiene laws, ordinances, or regulations relate to Hazardous Substances on, under, or about the Property), occupational or environmental conditions on, under, or about the Property, as now in effect, including without limitation, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) [42 U.S.C.A. §§ 9601 et seq.]; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) and the Solid Waste Disposal Act [42 U.S.C.A. §§ 6901 et seq.]; the Clean Water Act, also known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) [33 U.S.C.A. §§ 1251 et seq.]; the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) [15 U.S.C.A. §§ 2601 et seq.]; the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA) [49 U.S.C.A. §§ 1801 et seq.]; the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) [7 U.S.C.A. §§ 136 et seq.]; the Clean Air Act (CAA) [42 U.S.C.A. §§ 7401 et seq.]; the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) [42 U.S.C.A. §§ 300f et seq.]; the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA) [30 U.S.C.A. §§ 1201 et seq.]; the Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA or EPCRTKA) [42 U.S.C.A. §§ 11001 et seq.]; the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA) [29 U.S.C.A. §§ 655, 6571; the California laws regarding the underground storage of hazardous substances [H & S C §§ 25280 et seq.]; the Hazardous Substance Account Act [H & S C §§ 25300 et seq.]; the California laws regarding hazardous waste control [H & S C §§ 25100 et seq.]; the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 [H & S C §§ 25249.5 et seq.]; the Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act [Wat C §§ 13000 et seq.], and any amendments of or regulations promulgated under the statutes cited above and any other federal, state, or local law, statute, ordinance, or regulation now in effect that pertains to occupational health or industrial hygiene, and only to the extent that the occupational health or industrial hygiene laws, ordinances, or regulations relate to Hazardous Substances on, under, or about the Property, or the regulation or protection of the environment, including ambient air, soil, soil vapor, groundwater, surface water, or land use. 2.4.2 "Hazardous Substances" includes without limitation: (i) Those substances included within the definitions of "hazardous substance," "hazardous waste," "hazardous material," "toxic substance," "solid waste," or "pollutant or contaminant" in CERCLA, RCRA, TSCA, HMTA, or under any other Environmental Law; (ii) Those substances listed in the United States Department of Transportation (DOT) Table [49 CFR 172.101], or by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), or any successor agency, as hazardous substances [40 CFR Part 3021; -3- (iii) Other substances, materials, and wastes that are or become regulated or classified as hazardous or toxic under federal, state, or local laws or regulations; and (iv) Any material, waste, or substance that is: a petroleum or refined petroleum product, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyl, designated as a hazardous substance pursuant to 33 U.S.C.A. § 1321 or listed pursuant to 33 U.S.C.A. § 1317, a flammable explosive, or a radioactive material. 3. Escrow. By this Agreement, RCA and Donor establish an escrow ("Escrow") with a reputable title company chosen by RCA (the "Escrow Agent"), subject to the provisions of the standard conditions for acceptance of escrow and the terms and conditions in this Agreement, with a signed counterpart of this document to be delivered as escrow instructions to Escrow Agent. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and the standard conditions for acceptance of escrow, the terms of this Agreement shall control. RCA's agent for matters related to the Closing of Escrow shall be the Executive Director or his designee. 4. Feasibility Period. 4.1 During the period commencing on the date of this Agreement and terminating on a date which is sixty (60) days from the date of this Agreement ("Feasibility Period"), RCA may undertake at RCA's expense an inspection of the Property. Said inspection may include: (i) a review of the physical condition of the Property, including but not limited to, inspection and examination of soils, environmental factors, Hazardous Substances, if any, and archeological information relating to the Property; and (ii) a review and investigation of the effect of any zoning, maps, permits, reports, engineering data, regulations, ordinances, and laws affecting the Property. Within ten (10) days following the full execution of this Agreement by both parties, Donor shall deliver to RCA copies of all architectural plans, surveys, specifications, and other documents pertaining to the physical, geological, or environmental condition of the Property that are owned by or in the possession of Donor. 4.2 If RCA's environmental consultant requires additional time to determine the existence and extent of any Hazardous Substances on the Property, RCA shall have the right, exercisable by delivering written notice to Donor prior to the expiration of the Feasibility Period, to extend the Feasibility Period for up to an additional sixty (60) days to complete the testing. 4.3 If RCA disapproves of the results of the inspection and review or the results of any Phase I Environmental Report, RCA may elect, prior to the last day of the Feasibility Period (or any extension thereof), to terminate this Agreement by giving Donor written notification prior to the last day of the Feasibility Period (or any extension thereof). If RCA fails to properly notify Donor of the intent to terminate this Agreement, RCA shall be deemed to be satisfied with the results of the inspection and shall be deemed to have waived the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this provision. 5. Access. 5.1 Access to the Property during the Feasibility Period shall be given to RCA, its agents, employees, or contractors during normal business hours upon at least one (1) EN 465 business days' notice to Donor, at RCA's own cost and risk, for any purposes, including, but not limited to, inspecting the Property, taking samples of the soil, and conducting an environmental audit (including an investigation of past and current uses of the Property). RCA shall indemnify and defend Donor against and hold Donor harmless from all losses, costs, damages, liabilities, and expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney fees arising out of RCA's entry onto the Property or any activity thereon by RCA or its agents, employees, or contractors prior to the Close of Escrow except to the extent any such losses, costs, damages, liabilities, and expenses arise out of the gross negligence or willful acts of Donor. Any entry onto the Property by RCA or its agents, employees, or contractors shall be at reasonable times. The provisions of this Section shall survive the Close of Escrow. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, RCA and Donor agree that RCA shall not incur any liability hereunder merely by the discovery of an "Existing Adverse Condition" (as defined below) regardless of whether such Existing Adverse Condition, once revealed, negatively impacts the value of the Property or otherwise causes Donor to incur liabilities, costs or expenses. The term "Existing Adverse Condition" shall mean an adverse condition existing on or with respect to the Property that is discovered or revealed by RCA in the course of its Property inspection hereunder. 5.2 In addition to the provisions of Section 4.1, RCA and its agents, employees, or contractors shall have the right, from the date of this Agreement until the Closing Date, to contact any federal, state, or local governmental authority or agency to investigate any matters relating to the Property. Donor agrees to cooperate reasonably with RCA and its agents, employees, or contractors in the inspection of the Property and agrees to deliver to RCA all information in Donor's possession or control pertaining to the condition of the Property, including engineering and environmental reports, studies, tests, monitoring results, and related documentation. 6. Title. 6.1 Immediately following the execution of this Agreement by both Parties, RCA shall cause Escrow Agent to issue to RCA (with a copy to Donor) a preliminary report for an ALTA Standard Policy of Title Insurance, setting forth all liens, encumbrances, easements, restrictions, conditions, pending litigation, judgments, administrative proceedings, and other matters affecting Donor's title to the Property ("Preliminary Report"), together with copies of all documents relating to title exceptions referred to in the Preliminary Report. 6.2 Following the full execution of this Agreement by both Parties, RCA may cause a survey and/or an ALTA Survey of the Property to be prepared by a registered surveyor or professional engineer ("Survey"). Donor agrees to deliver to RCA, promptly following the full execution and delivery of this Agreement, copies of any survey of the Property in the possession of Donor. 6.3 RCA shall approve or disapprove, in writing to Donor with a copy to Escrow Agent, each exception shown on the Preliminary Report and each encroachment, overlap, or boundary line dispute, or any other matter that materially and adversely affects title to the Property or that violates any law, rule, or regulation reflected on the Survey (each an "Exception") within twenty (20) business days following the receipt of the Preliminary Report or the Survey, whichever is later. RCA's failure to object within the twenty (20) day period shall be -5- deemed to be a disapproval of the Exceptions. The Exceptions approved by RCA hereunder shall be referred to as the "Approved Exceptions." 6.4 If any Exception is disapproved or deemed disapproved (each a "Disapproved Exception'), Donor shall have the right, but not the obligation, within thirty (30) days following expiration of the twenty (20) day period provided under Section 6.3 above, to cause each Disapproved Exception to be discharged, satisfied, released, or terminated, as the case may be, of record, and in a form that is reasonably satisfactory to RCA and Escrow Agent, all at Donor's sole cost and expense. Donor agrees to deposit into Escrow the sum sufficient to discharge any Disapproved Exception that may be discharged only by the payment of money. If Donor is unable or unwilling to obtain a discharge, satisfaction, release, or termination of any Disapproved Exception within the period specified above, then this Agreement shall automatically terminate ten (10) business days after expiration of the 30-day period for curing the Disapproved Exceptions or after Donor advises RCA in writing that Donor is unable or unwilling to cause such discharge, satisfaction, release, or termination, whichever occurs first, unless within such 10-business-day period RCA waives in writing such Disapproved Exception, in which event such Disapproved Exception shall be deemed an Approved Exception under this Agreement. If this Agreement terminates pursuant to the foregoing sentence, then Donor shall pay all charges of the Escrow Agent in connection with this transaction, including the charges of the surveyor and environmental engineering company; and the Parties shall be relieved of all further obligations and liabilities to each other under this Agreement except as otherwise provided herein, and all funds and documents deposited with Escrow Agent shall be promptly refunded or returned, as the case may be, by Escrow Agent to the depositing Party. Anything above to the contrary notwithstanding, it is understood and agreed that RCA's indemnity obligations under Section 5 shall not terminate upon termination of this Agreement pursuant to this or any other provision hereof. 7. Close of Escrow. 7.1 Title. Simultaneously with the Close of Escrow, Escrow Agent shall issue an ALTA Standard Policy of Title Insurance (formerly referred to as a CLTA Title Policy) ("Title Policy") in the amount of $500,000, subject only to (i) liens for real property taxes, bonds, and assessments not then due, and (ii) the Approved Exceptions. 7.2 Donor's Deposits into Escrow. Donor shall deposit with Escrow Agent on or prior to the Close of Escrow the following documents: (i) a grant deed in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "C" executed and acknowledged by Donor, conveying to RCA good and marketable fee simple title to the Property, subject only to the Approved Exceptions ("Deed"); (ii) all funds required to be placed in escrow by Donor; and (iii) Donor's approval of the draft of Escrow Agent's closing statement. 7.3 RCA's Deposits into Escrow. RCA's approval of the Survey, and RCA's approval of the draft of Escrow Agent's closing statement. W 467 7.4 Closing Date. The conveyance of the Property to RCA and the closing of this transaction ("Close of Escrow") shall take place within one hundred twenty (120) days ("Closing Date") following the establishment of an Escrow pursuant to Section 3 of this Agreement. 7.5 Closing Statements. No more than two days prior to the Closing Date, Escrow Agent shall deliver to RCA and to Donor, for their respective approvals, drafts of Escrow Agent's closing statement showing all receipts and disbursements of the Escrow. 7.6 Closing Instructions. On the Closing Date (or any extension thereof), Escrow Agent shall close Escrow as follows: Riverside County Recorder; (i) record the Deed (marked for return to RCA) with the (ii) issue the Title Policy; (iii) prorate taxes, assessments, rents, and other charges as provided in Section 8.7 below; (iv) prepare and deliver to both RCA and Donor one signed copy of Escrow Agent's closing statement showing all receipts and disbursements of the Escrow; (v) If Escrow Agent is unable to simultaneously perform all of the instructions set forth above, Escrow Agent shall notify RCA and Donor and retain all funds and documents pending receipt of further instructions jointly issued by RCA and Donor. 7.7 Closing Costs and Prorations. Donor shall pay the following closing costs and prorations through the Close of Escrow: (i) All governmental conveyancing fees and taxes due upon transfer of the Property, except that no documentary transfer tax will be payable with respect to this transaction, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11922; (ii) The recording charges in connection with recordation of the Deed; except that this Deed is entitled to be recorded without a fee pursuant to Government Code Section 27383 because the Deed is for the benefit of a public agency; (iii) All charges in connection with issuance of the Title Policy in the amount of $500,000; (iv) All charges related to any survey undertaken in connection with an ALTA Extended Policy of Title Insurance; and (v) All fees and charges levied by Escrow Agent. 7.8 Real Estate Taxes, Bonds, and Assessments. RCA and Donor are each public entities that are exempt from real property taxes and assessments. Notwithstanding the -7- foregoing, in order to allocate risk of which party is required to assume responsibility for any existing taxes that were assessed while the Property was owned by a private party or as a result of an erroneous assessment, Donor shall be responsible for any bond, assessment or past due real property tax that constitutes a lien on the Property at the Closing and RCA shall be responsible for any such item that is assessed following the Closing. 7.9 Possession. Possession of the Property shall be delivered to RCA at the Close of Escrow. 8. Acceptance. The acceptance of the Property by RCA and the Closing of Escrow (as defined in Section 8) are subject to the satisfaction of the following no later than the Closing Date: (i) RCA's approval of the condition of the Property as provided in Section 4 and title to the Property as provided in Section 6; (ii) The representations and warranties of Donor set forth in Section 2.2 shall be true and accurate as of the Closing Date; (iii) Donor's performance of all obligations under this Agreement; (iv) No adverse material change shall have occurred with respect to the condition of the Property from the end of the Feasibility Period through the Closing Date; and (v) Escrow Agent being prepared to issue the Title Policy on the Close of Escrow, subject only to the Approved Exceptions. 9. Intentionally Deleted. 10. The performance by RCA of its obligations under this Agreement shall relieve RCA of any and all further obligations or claims on account of the acceptance of the offer of dedication. RCA agrees to use the Property for the purposes of wildlife and plant habitat conservation pursuant to the MSHCP. 11. This Agreement and Escrow may be terminated by RCA upon three (3) days written notice to Donor and Escrow Agent if the conditions to closing set forth in Section 9 have not been fulfilled on or before the Closing Date. Upon termination by RCA pursuant to this Section 12, Donor shall be responsible for all costs and expenses of Escrow Agent. 12. As used in this Agreement, notice includes but is not limited to, the communication of any notice, request, demand, approval, statement, report, acceptance, consent, waiver and appointment. All notices must be in writing. Notice is given either (i) when delivered in person to the person or company intended named below, or (ii) when sent via reputable overnight courier (such as Federal Express), addressed by name and addressed to the party or persons intended, as follows: In To RCA: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Riverside Centre Building 3403 loth Street, Suite 320 Riverside, CA 92501 Phone: (951) 955-9700 Attention: Executive Director To Donor: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, California 92502-2208 Attn: Executive Director Phone: (951) 787-7141 until such time as a party gives notice of the change of address in accordance with the terms of this section. 13. This Agreement shall not be changed, modified or amended except upon the written consent of the Parties hereto. 14. This Agreement is the result of negotiations between the Parties and is intended by the Parties to be a final expression of their understanding with respect to the matters herein contained. This Agreement supersedes any and all other prior agreements and understandings, oral or written, in connection therewith. No provision contained herein shall be construed against RCA solely because it prepared this Agreement in its executed form. 15. Donor, their assigns and successors in interest, shall be bound by all the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement, and all the parties thereto shall be jointly and severally liable thereunder. 16. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement or any other agreement between any of the Parties hereto, once the Property is conveyed to and accepted by RCA, RCA shall have no obligation to return the Property to the Donor under any circumstances, except in the sole and exclusive discretion of RCA. 17. Pursuant to RCA's Policies and Procedures for Execution of IRS Form 8283 for Bargain Sales and Donations, RCA agrees to cooperate with Donor to acknowledge receipt of the donation of the Property by signing Internal Revenue Form 8283 (Non -Cash Charitable Contributions) before the Close of Escrow and any other tax -related forms or documents reasonably requested by Donor and to return any such forms to Donor within thirty business (30) days after RCA's receipt of such forms from Donor. Notwithstanding the foregoing, RCA makes no representation or warranty to Donor regarding the tax attributes of this transaction, nor shall RCA endorse or otherwise acknowledge any valuation of the Property for tax purposes, it being understood that the Donor has obtained its own appraisals and tax advice for such purposes. in 470 18. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts. Each shall be deemed an original and all, taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN THE WITNESS THEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly -authorized representatives on the date and year set forth below. Date: MA(Z �% , 2018 Date: RCA: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority By: + Ch les V RCTC: e Director Riverside County Transportation Commission 2018 By: Anne Mayer, Executive Director -10- 471 Exhibit "A" Legal Description of the Property All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: That portion of the North '/2 of Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 1 East, SBM, in the County of Riverside, State of California, lying North of the Palms to Pines Highway as surveyed by the County of Riverside in 1929 and East of a North and South line drawn 17.20 chains East of and parallel with the West line of said Section 14. Except therefrom the following described property: All that portion of the North '/2 of said Section 14 described as follows Beginning at the Northeast corner of Section 14; Thence North 89051'23" West, along the North line of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, a distance of 2593.61 feet to the North 1/4 Corner of Section 14; Thence North 89°30'48" West, along the North line of the Northwest quarter of Section 14, a distance of 482.11 feet; Thence South 50°32'49" East, a distance of 98.00 feet; Thence South 66°05'43" East, a distance of 174.13 feet; Thence South 78057'37" East, a distance of 254.09 feet; Thence South 63004'02" East, a distance of 238.55 feet; Thence South 75°57'42" East, a distance of 422.85 feet; Thence South 3040'04" West, a distance of 341.31 feet; Thence South 10002'35" West, a distance of 121.31 feet; Thence South 13°26'30" West, a distance of 207.00 feet to a point on the Northerly right of way of State Highway 74, 80 feet wide, as shown on Caltrans Right of Way Map No. 419522 and filed as Right of Way Map No 204-584 in the Riverside County Surveyor's Office; Thence along a non -tangent curve concave to the South with a radius of 5040.00 feet from an initial bearing of South 73°53'37" East; through a central angle of 0°27'27", an arc distance of 40.25 feet more or less to the end of said curve; Page 1 of 2 472 Thence South 73'26'10" East, a distance of 2118.39 feet to the East line of Section 14; Thence North 0°19'36" West, along the East line of Section 14, a distance of 1658.19 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing an area of approximately 33.57 Acres. Subject to all other easements and offers of dedication of record. Prepared by: Steve A. Leja — PLS 5933 Leja Surveying Corp Page 2 of 2 473 EXHIBIT `B" Legal Description of the Retained Portion All that portion of the North '/Z of Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 1 East, San Bernardino Meridian, in the State of California, County of Riverside, according to the Official Plat thereof, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the East line of Section 14 and the Northerly right of way of State Highway 74 as shown on the California Division of Highway Right of Way Map No. 419522; Thence North 73'26'10" West, along said Northerly right of way line a distance of 2118.39 feet to the beginning of a curve, concave southerly the radius point of which bears S 16°33'50" W a distance of 5040 feet; Thence Westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 0°27'27" a distance of 40.24 feet to the Southwest corner of that parcel of land described in a Deed recorded July 28, 2009 as Document No. 2009-0391461 of Official Records; Thence N 13°26'30" E along the West line of said parcel a distance of 207.00 feet to an angle point therein, said angle point being the True Point of Beginning; Thence N 89*55'18" E a distance of 125.07 feet; Thence N 10*12'45" W a distance of 122.05 feet; Thence S 89°24'58" W a distance of 82.28 feet; Thence leaving said parcel of land, S 10'02'35" W a distance of 121.31 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Containing an area of approximately 12418.32 square feet or 0.285 Acres Prepared by: Steve A. Leja — PLS 5933 Leja Surveying Corp Page 1 of 1 Exhibit B-1 474 Exhibit "B" Plot Retained Parcel S 89-2458- W 82.28 z 0.285 Acres NNp N 89*55'18" E 125.07 POO II o SCALE: 1"=100 FEET 0 50 100 200 of N 0 C2 C1 zLd 0 POC 74 CURVE TABLE NO DELTA RADIUS LENGTH w L�q C1 1*37'06" 5000 141.23 Cko� C2 0'27'27" 5040 40.24 Exhibit B-2 475 Exhibit C Grant Deed Exhibit C-1 476 Recorded at request of and return to: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 3403 Tenth Street, Suite 320 Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Executive Director FREE RECORDING This instrument is for the benefit of the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority, and is entitled to be recorded without fee. (Gov. Code, § 27383) (Space above this line reserved for Recorder's use) GRANT DEED PROJECT: MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN APN: 553-220-023 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, a county transportation commission, herein called "Grantor", hereby GRANTS to WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY, a public agency and a joint powers authority ("Grantee"), the real property in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as: See Exhibit "1" attached hereto and made a part hereof IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this Grant Deed as of the _th day of , 2018. Riverside County Transportation Commission WE Anne Mayer, Executive Director 1 477 NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On before me, , Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (Seal) 2 478 EXHIBIT "I" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY All that certain real property situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: Exhibit 1 479 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the real property conveyed by RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, on the Grant Deed dated , 2018, to the WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY (Grantee), is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of the Grantee, pursuant to authority conferred by Ordinance No. 08-01, as adopted by the Board of Directors on July 7, 2008, and the Grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: GRANTEE: WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY, A public agency and a joint powers authority LE Charles V. Landry, Executive Director N AGENDA ITEM 8Q RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Mark Lancaster, Right of Way Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Perris to Grant Excess Mid County Parkway Right of Way to the City for Use in City's Placentia Avenue Widening Project Between Indian Avenue and Perris Boulevard STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. 18-66-083-00 between the Commission and the city of Perris (City) stipulating the grant of excess right of way to the City for use on the City's Placentia Avenue widening project between Indian Avenue and Perris Boulevard; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the MOU; 3) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute future non - funding related amendments to the MOU; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute documents related to the grant of excess right of way parcels acquired for the Mid County Parkway (MCP) project to the City for use on the Placentia Avenue widening project, in accordance with the Commission's right of way policies and procedures. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission's 1-215/Placentia Avenue interchange project (Attachment 1) will construct a new interchange at 1-215/Placentia Avenue and four lanes on Placentia Avenue between the East Frontage Road and Indian Avenue, connecting to the existing two-lane section of Placentia Avenue between Indian Avenue and Perris Boulevard. Construction of the interchange project is anticipated to be completed by 2022. In the interest of good planning and to avoid future congestion, the City's Placentia Avenue widening project will widen the existing two-lane section on Placentia Avenue to four lanes to match the four -lane Placentia Avenue roadway that the Commission's 1-215/Placentia Avenue interchange project will construct between Harvill Street and Indian Avenue to the west and the existing four -lane section east of Perris Boulevard. The City Agenda Item 8Q M• anticipates completing the Placentia Avenue widening project approximately the same time the Commission completes the 1-215/Placentia Avenue interchange project. The MCP project will also be acquiring right of way immediately south of Placentia Avenue between 1-215 and Perris Boulevard. This right of way acquisition will result in linear strips of undevelopable excess right of way between the future MCP and existing Placentia Avenue. The City is requesting the Commission grant to the City at no cost the excess right of way that the City needs for its widening project. Commission staff supports the City's request, as completion of the Commission's 1-215/Placentia Avenue interchange project and City's Placentia Avenue widening project will provide another safe and efficient access point to 1-215 and provide congestion relief to adjacent interchanges at Nuevo Road and Cajalco Road. In consultation with legal counsel, Commission staff prepared a MOU that addresses Commission and City responsibilities in connection with the right of way grant. City staff supports this MOU and will seek approval at the May 29 city council meeting. Staff recommends approval of the MOU between the Commission and the City stipulating the grant of excess right of way to the City for use on the City's Placentia Avenue widening project. Staff also recommends authorization for the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the MOU and for the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute future non -funding related amendments to the MOU. Finally, in connection with the grant of excess right of way parcels to the City, staff recommends authorization for the Executive Director to execute required documents. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: N/A Year: I FY 2018/19+ Amount: $0 N/A; excess right of way to be granted to Source of Funds: be acquired with Transportation Uniform Budget Adjustment: N/A Mitigation Fee or 2009 Measure A Western County New Corridor funds GL/Project N/A; excess right of way granted will reduce capital assets (land) recorded in the Accounting No.: government -wide accounting records Fiscal Procedures Date: 05/21/2018 Approved: Attachments: 1) Exhibit Map — Placentia Avenue Widening 2) Draft City of Perris Placentia Avenue Right of Way MOU Agreement No. 18-66-083-00 Agenda Item 8Q E; ATTACHMENT 1 W Rider St �O aa Perris v— 9zWn Place\Avex Placentia Ave Q z Future Mid County Parkway N Water Ave RCTC Project Limits 0 City Widening Project EM ATTACHMENT 2 RCTC Agreement No. 4 8-66-083-00 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF PERRIS RELATED TO THE PLACENTIA AVENUE WIDENING PROJECT I. PARTIES AND TERM A. This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is entered into by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("RCTC") and the CITY OF PERRIS ("CITY") (and together the "PARTIES") on , 2018 ("Effective Date"). B. The Term of this MOU will commence on the Effective Date and, unless terminated early as provided in Section V(B), terminate upon the date a notice of completion is recorded for the Placentia Avenue Widening Project ("PROJECT"), as more fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein, or January 1, 2022, whichever is earlier. IL RECITALS A. WHEREAS, RCTC is currently obtaining portions of the right of way necessary for the Mid County Parkway project ("MCP Project"), which includes excess right of way between Indian Avenue and Perris Boulevard necessary to construct the PROJECT. B. WHEREAS, in the interests of good transportation planning and efficiency, RCTC desires to make such excess right of way (the "ROW") available to the CITY in accordance with the terms of this MOU. C. RCTC has awarded a design contract for improvements to the I-215 Placentia Avenue Interchange ("Placentia IC"), which is a portion of the MCP Project. D. WHEREAS, the PARTIES are entering into this MOU for the purpose of documenting the terms and conditions of cooperation between the PARTIES towards the completion of the PROJECT. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the PARTIES hereby agree as follows: III. RCTC'S RESPONSIBILITIES A. RCTC will provide necessary ROW for the PROJECT as it acquires parcels needed for the MCP Project and the PROJECT, and will grant those portions acquired and necessary for the PROJECT to the CITY to the extent that those parcels are acquired by RCTC. B. RCTC shall have sole discretion over all aspects of the acquisition of ROW under this MOU, including without limitation the timing and price paid for the ROW. C. RCTC will not be reimbursed for the ROW acquisition. 17336.00001\30378604.8 IV. kv D. RCTC will assign a qualified member of its staff to coordinate with the CITY to facilitate the acquisition and transfer of ROW to the CITY. E. RCTC will endeavor to complete the Placentia IC improvements by January 1, 2022. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES A. CITY will be responsible for completing all necessary environmental reviews as the designated lead agency for the PROJECT. B. CITY will be responsible for completing the plans, specifications and estimates, utility conflict identification and relocation, advertise, award, and administration the completion of construction of the PROJECT in accordance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, including those applicable due to any funding used to construct the PROJECT. C. CITY will be responsible for funding the PROJECT. D. CITY will cooperate and assist RCTC concerning the acquisition of any property determined to be necessary for the completion of the PROJECT. E. CITY will endeavor to complete the PROJECT by January 1, 2022. F. CITY will assign a qualified member of its staff to coordinate with RCTC to facilitate the acquisition and transfer of ROW to the CITY. MISCELLANEOUS A. Recitals. The Recitals stated above are integral parts of this MOU and are hereby incorporated into the terms of this MOU. B. Termination. Both RCTC and CITY shall have the right at any time, to terminate this MOU, with or without cause, by giving thirty (30) calendar days written notice to the other party, specifying the date of termination. C. Notification. Each party will designate a person to be responsible for communications regarding the PROJECT. For RCTC, that person will be Alex Menor, RCTC Capital Projects Manager. For CITY, that person will be Habib Motlagh, City Engineer. All notices and communications regarding this MOU, interpretation of the terms of this MOU, or changes thereto will be provided as follows: RCTC Street Address: 4080 Lemon St 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502 CITY 24 S. D Street Suite 100 Perris, CA 92570 Attn: Habib Motlagh Phone: 951-943-6504 Email: habib@Trilakeconsultants.com 17336.00001\30378604.8 2 Attn: Alex Menor Phone: 951.787.7970 Email: AMenor@RCTC.org D. Amendment. In the event the PARTIES determine the provisions of this MOU should be altered, the PARTIES may execute an amendment to add, delete, or amend any provision of this MOU. All such amendments must be in the form of a written instrument signed by the authorized representatives of the PARTIES and with any necessary governing board approvals. E. No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. F. Governing Law; Venue. This MOU shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. G. Counterparts. This MOU may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. [Signatures on following page] 17336.00001\30378604.8 3 E:. SIGNATURE PAGE TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF PERRIS RELATED TO THE PLACENTIA AVENUE WIDENING PROJECT IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have executed this MOU and this MOU is effective on the date first set forth above. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION CITY OF PERRIS COMMISSION Executive Director Reviewed and Approved as to Form: Best Best & Krieger, LLP RCTC Legal Counsel City Manager City Attorney 17336.00001\30378604.8 4 E• EXHIBIT A PROJECT Description The Project includes the following improvements: In the city of Perris, widen Placentia Avenue from 2 lanes to 4 lanes with single left turn lane at Barrett Avenue, add a single right and dual left turn lanes in the westbound direction at Indian Avenue, add a single right turn and dual left turn lanes in the eastbound direction at Perris Boulevard, roadway drainage system, and curb, gutter, sidewalks and appurtenances. 17336.00001\30378604.8 5 N AGENDA ITEM 8R RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2018/19 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Agreement for Inland Empire Rideshare and 511 Services STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 18-45-142-00 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) to reimburse the Commission in an amount not to exceed $1,550,000 for Fiscal Year 2018/19 commuter/employer rideshare and Inland Empire 511 (IE511) programs administered by the Commission, on behalf of both agencies, as part of an ongoing bi-county partnership; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Since 1993, SBCTA has contracted with the Commission to develop, implement, and manage a Commuter Assistance Program (CAP) for San Bernardino County commuters. The program consists of several projects: • Rideshare Incentives, developed as a sister incentive project to the Commission's Measure A commuter incentive project, focusing on encouraging solo drivers to try alternative commute modes; • Ridesharefts, modeled after the Commission's rideshare rewards program, providing Entertainment© discounts to local and national merchants for long-term ridesharers; • Employer Services, implemented by SBCTA and the Commission in FY 1995/96 when it was determined by the two agencies that the Inland Empire would assume direct responsibility for the provision of local employer rideshare services. The CAP provides various services to employers in the bi-county area including the provision of marketing promotions, rideshare survey processing, assistance with average vehicle ridership calculations/compliance, employer network meetings, and newsletters; • Ridematching and Information Services, jointly established in FY 2002/03 by the Commission and SBCTA when they began providing these services directly; Agenda Item 811 ,.. " IE511, implemented in FY 2009/10 to provide traveler information to Riverside and San Bernardino County commuters; and " IECommuter, launched in FY 2014/15, integrating IE511 traveler information and rideshare services to provide commuters with a personalized service. In partnership with SBCTA, the FY 2018/19 work plan and budget for continuation of SBCTA's CAP and the ongoing maintenance and operation of a 511 travel information services system was developed by Commission staff. The proposed agreement between SBCTA and the Commission will be presented to SBCTA's Transit Committee meeting in May and then to its Board of Directors meeting in June for final approval. Staff seeks Commission approval of an agreement with SBCTA for its share of the CAP in an amount not to exceed $1,550,000 to be reimbursed to the Commission. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2018/19 Amount: $1,550,000 Source of Funds: SBCTA reimbursements Budget Adjustment: No GL/Project Accounting No.: 002111/002112/632113/002139/002146/002178/002182/002188/ 002191 416 41605 0000 263 4141203 $1,325,000 452124 416 41605 0000 202 45 41203 $ 225,000 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 05/25/2018 Attachment: Draft FY 2018/19 SBCTA Funding Agreement Agenda Item 811 M1 ATTACHMENT 1 AGREEMENT 18-1001950 BY AND BETWEEN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION M IMPLEMENTATION OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FISCAL YEAR 2018/2019 EMPLOYER AND COMMUTER TRIP REDUCTION/RIDESHARE PROGRAMS THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into as of July 1, 2018 ("Effective Date"), in the State of California by and between SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, referred to herein as "SBCTA," and the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, referred to herein as "RCTC." WHEREAS, SBCTA approved allocation of Measure I - Valley Traffic Management Systems (VTMS) funds, and Victor Valley Traffic Management Systems funds, and Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds, to provide trip reduction services as well as incentives for the commuter programs. WHEREAS, SBCTA receives CMAQ and other federal funds and may use these funds to reimburse RCTC for its Services in performing Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Services and RCTC will comply with the applicable federal requirements as set forth in "Exhibit C". WHEREAS, SBCTA requires professional and consulting services with respect to the provision of commuter services and programs within San Bernardino County. WHEREAS, RCTC has managed the bi-county Inland Empire Commuter Services, now named IE Commuter, program since November 3, 1993, and has the expertise and resources necessary to manage such Services for SBCTA. WHEREAS, the Code of Federal Regulations encourages grantees and subgrantees of federal funds, such as CMAQ funds, to enter into local intergovernmental agreements for procurement or use of common goods or services. WHEREAS, for the avoidance of doubt, the parties to this Agreement acknowledge and agree that RCTC is not a subrecipient of federal funds from SBCTA, but is entering into a local intergovernmental agreement with SBCTA for procurement or use of common goods or services. 18-1001950 Page 1 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 491 WHEREAS, RCTC owns and/or operates web based software ("Software") which it uses to implement the IE Commuter program, and may use to implement other public agency employer and commuter trip reduction rideshare services and programs for the benefit of the public (collectively, "Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction Rideshare programs"). WHEREAS, the Software allows RCTC to create and maintain a regional database of commuter and employer information for the IE Commuter program, and for any other Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction Rideshare programs (the "Regional Database"). WHEREAS, SBCTA will designate approved key personnel requiring access to the Software to receive log -in information for the Software from ROTC. WHEREAS, SBCTA will protect the confidential information received or accessible through the Software and will obtain and provide to RCTC non -disclosure and confidentiality agreements with its approved key personnel designated to receive access to the Software. WHEREAS, RCTC has the right to operate and provide use of the Software to any other public agency ("Public Agency Participant") for the purpose of implementing Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction Rideshare programs, and to allow access to the Regional Database by any Public Agency Participant, provided that RCTC shall require all Public Agency Participants to comply with the same confidentiality and access requirements as set forth above. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: A. Contract Services. 1. RCTC will administer, market, and implement commuter services and 511 programs in coordination with RCTC's commuter services program and in coordination with the regional ridesharing core services program in compliance with and as specified in the scope of work, Attachment "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Services"). 2. RCTC shall provide program administration and oversight and assure that its consultants and/or staff performs its Services within the budgets set forth in the scope of work, Attachment "A." 3. RCTC will work collaboratively and in partnership with SBCTA during the project and notify SBCTA staff of any changes to the rideshare program, as set forth in Attachment "A". 4. SBCTA shall timely respond to RCTC on matters requiring RCTC to coordinate with SBCTA, as set forth in Attachment "A". 5. RCTC shall provide SBCTA with the following reports, on a monthly or quarterly basis, as set forth below, relative to tasks identified in the scope of work, Attachment "A", to this Agreement: 18-1001950 Page 2 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 492 (a) Monthly Commuter Assistance Program Meeting Agenda (b) Quarterly Commuter Assistance Report (c) Quarterly Commuter Assistance Activity Master Report (d) Quarterly Regional Database Report (e) Annual Commuter Assistance Trip Data Report (e) Monthly IE511 All Hands Meeting Minutes/Agenda/Stats B. Compensation. 1. It is understood that SBCTA funding for the program under this Agreement will not exceed one million five hundred fifty thousand dollars, and no cents ($1,550,000.00) and is expected to be provided from CMAQ funds. 2. SBCTA receives CMAQ and other federal funds and may use these other funds to reimburse RCTC for its costs in performing the Services. As a result, SBCTA is required to report statistics each year relating to the rideshare and 511 program. 3. It is agreed that SBCTA Measure I Funds or other eligible funds will reimburse RCTC for the cost of purchasing any items not reimbursable by CMAQ and invoices submitted to SBCTA shall clearly delineate expenditures identified by SBCTA as non - reimbursable expenditures. It is agreed that in the event sufficient funds from the sources set forth above do not become available to SBCTA for this Agreement, SBCTA may immediately terminate this Agreement with written notice, notwithstanding Section C.2. below, but shall pay to RCTC from other sources any amounts required to cover RCTC's costs to the date of Agreement termination. 4. SBCTA shall pay RCTC on a cost -reimbursement basis, based upon invoices which delineate charges based on tasks identified in the scope of work, Attachment "A." All invoices shall be provided to SBCTA no more frequently than on a bi-monthly basis and no less than a quarterly basis. All invoices will be delivered to and received by SBCTA no later than 60 days after the end of the calendar year quarter. 5. SBCTA shall be fully responsible for obtaining cost reimbursements of CMAQ funds. SBCTA shall ensure that the CMAQ funds are used for authorized purposes in compliance with laws, regulations, and the provision of the terms in this agreement, and that performance goals are achieved. 6. SBCTA shall review all billings submitted by RCTC for accuracy and process payment based thereon to RCTC in a timely manner. 7. RCTC shall maintain during the term of this Agreement and for three years thereafter accounting records which cover the receipt and disbursement of all funds 18-1001950 Page 3 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 493 provided for the programs administered and implemented under this Agreement. Such records shall be made available for inspection during normal business hours by duly authorized representatives of SBCTA, SBCTA' s auditors, Caltrans, Federal Highway Administration, and the United States Department of Transportation, so that SBCTA can comply with the Single Audit Act and OMB Circular No. A-133. In addition, the federal provisions set forth in Attachment "C" shall apply to this Agreement. C. Term. 1. This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 2018, and terminate on June 30, 2019, unless it is extended by a written amendment approved by the parties. 2. Either party may terminate this Agreement by giving thirty (30) days written notice to the other for no or any reason, including, but not limited to, changes in legislation, rules and regulations impacting trip reduction programs. SBCTA shall pay for any Service provided up to the effective date of the termination. 3. The Executive Directors of both RCTC and SBCTA shall have the authority in their sole discretion to give notice of termination on behalf of their respective agencies. D. Indemnification and Insurance. 1. (a) It is understood and agreed that neither RCTC nor any officer, official, employee, director, consultant, agent, or volunteer thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reasons of anything done or omitted to be done by SBCTA under or in connection with any work authority or jurisdiction delegated to SBCTA under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, SBCTA shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless RCTC, and all its officers, officials, employees, directors, consultants, agents and volunteers from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind, and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by SBCTA under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to SBCTA under this Agreement. (b) It is understood and agreed that neither SBCTA nor any officer, official, employee, director, consultant, agent, member or volunteer thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reasons of anything done or omitted to be done by RCTC under or in connection with any work authority or jurisdiction delegated to RCTC under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, RCTC shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless SBCTA, and all its officers, officials, employees, directors, consultants, agents or volunteers from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind, and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by RCTC or its 18-1001950 Page 4 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 I•I consultants under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to RCTC under this Agreement. (c) RCTC and SBCTA, respectively, shall indemnify, pursuant to the provisions above, any Public Agency Participant for any disclosure by RCTC or SBCTA, respectively, of Confidential Information in violation of IE Commuter privacy policies, this Agreement or any applicable law. 2. Insurance Requirements Without in any way affecting the indemnity provisions identified in this Contract, RCTC shall, at RCTC's sole expense, and prior to the commencement of any work, procure and maintain in full force, insurance through the entire term of this Agreement and shall be written with at least the following limits of liability: (a) Professional Liability - Shall be provided in an amount not less than $1,000,000, per claim and $2,000,000 in the aggregate. RCTC shall secure and maintain this insurance or "tail" coverage provided throughout the term of this Contract and for a minimum of three (3) years after Contract completion. (b) Workers' Compensation - Worker's Compensation insurance shall be provided in an amount and form to meet all applicable requirements of the Labor Code of the State of California, including Employers Liability with $1,000,000 limits, covering all persons providing services on behalf of RCTC and all risks to such persons under this Agreement. (c) Commercial General Liability - To include coverage for Premises and Operations, Contractual Liability, Personal Injury Liability, Products/Completed Operations Liability, Broad -Form Property Damage and Independent Contractors' Liability, in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, combined single limit, and $2,000,000 in the aggregate written on an occurrence form. For products and completed operations a $2,000,000 aggregate shall be provided. (d) Automobile Liability - To include owned, non -owned and hired automobiles, in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, combined single limit, and in the aggregate written on an occurrence form. (e) Network and Privacy Insurance. RCTC shall carry, or shall cause its third party subcontractors to carry, Network and Privacy (Errors and Omissions) insurance in an amount of not less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 in the annual aggregate, protecting RCTC and SBCTA from the following exposures relating to RCTC's or any of its subcontractors performance under the Agreement: (i) the theft, dissemination and/or unauthorized disclosure of use of confidential information and personally identifiable information (not to be limited bank information, social security numbers, health information, credit card account information, and 18-1001950 Page 5 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 495 confidential corporate information). Such insurance shall also include coverage for credit monitoring, notification expenses and other related costs associated with mitigating a data security or privacy breach; and (ii) the introduction of a computer virus into, or otherwise causing damage to, a computer, computer system, network or similar computer -related property and the data, software, and programs used herein. If such insurance is maintained on an occurrence basis, RCTC or its third party subcontractors shall maintain such insurance for an additional period of one year following the end of the applicable Term. If such insurance is maintained on a claims -made basis, RCTC or its third party subcontractor shall maintain such insurance for an additional period of three years following the end of the applicable Term. (f) Proof of Coverage - RCTC shall furnish certificates of insurance to SBCTA evidencing the insurance coverage required above, prior to the commencement of performance of services hereunder, and such certificates shall include SBCTA as an additional insured on all insurances except Workers' Compensation and Professional Liability. Prior to commencing any work, RCTC shall furnish SBCTA with a certificate(s) of insurance, executed by a duly authorized representative of each insurer, showing compliance with the insurance requirements set forth in this Article. If the insurance company elects to cancel or non -renew coverage for any reason, RCTC will provide SBCTA 30 days' notice of such cancellation or nonrenewal. If the policy is cancelled for nonpayment of premium, RCTC will provide SBCTA ten (10) days' notice. RCTC shall maintain such insurance from the time RCTC commences performance of services hereunder until the completion of such Services. All certificates of insurance are to include the contract number and Project Manager's name. (g) Additional Insured- All policies, except for Workers Compensation and Professional Liability policies, shall contain endorsements naming SBCTA and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insureds with respect to liabilities arising out to the performance of Services hereunder. The additional insured endorsements shall not limit the scope of coverage for SBCTA to vicarious liability but shall allow coverage for SBCTA to the full extent provided by the policy. (h) Waiver of Subrogation Rights - RCTC shall require the carriers of the above required coverages to waive all rights of subrogation against SBCTA, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers, contractors, and subcontractors. All general auto liability insurance coverage provided shall not prohibit RCTC or CONSULTANT'S employees or agents from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss or claim. RCTC hereby waives all rights of subrogation against SBCTA. (i) All policies required herein are to be primary and non-contributory with any insurance carried or administered by SBCTA. 18-1001950 Page 6 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 0) Certificates/Insurer Rating/Cancellation Notice. (1) RCTC shall maintain and shall require its consultants to maintain such insurance from the time the Services commence until the Services are completed, except as may be otherwise required by this Section. (2) RCTC may legally self -insure, but shall require its consultants to place insurance with insurers having an A.M. Best Company rating of no less than A:VIII and licensed to do business in California. (3) RCTC and its consultants shall replace certificates, policies and endorsements for any insurance expiring prior to completion of the Services. E. Rights of SBCTA and RCTC. The Executive Directors of both SBCTA and RCTC shall have full authority to exercise their respective entities' rights under this Agreement. F. Ownership of Materials/Confidentiality/Use of Data. 1. Ownership. The following documents and data prepared by RCTC or RCTC's sub consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall become the common property of RCTC and SBCTA in both electronic and hard copy formats: (i) all data regarding commuters identified as residents of San Bernardino County, regardless of where they work; (ii) San Bernardino County employer information and employer worksite information (any county) for multi -site employers that define their headquarters to be within San Bernardino County; (iii) park and ride information specific to San Bernardino County; (iv) all data regarding 511 for San Bernardino County; (v) any monthly or quarterly reports produced by RCTC as required by this Agreement; and (vi) advertisements and collateral material for both the rideshare program and 511, including but not limited to: media, photos, video, messaging, etc., funded in whole or in part by SBCTA under this Agreement ("Documents and Data"). RCTC and SBCTA shall comply with all applicable state and federal law with regard to its use of such data, but shall not otherwise be limited in any way in its use of such data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at the respective party's sole risk and provided that the other party shall be indemnified against any damages resulting from such use, including the release of this material to third parties for a use not intended by this Agreement. Neither party to this Agreement shall sell the data or other materials prepared under this Agreement without the written permission of both parties. 2. Confidentiality. Except as otherwise provided in Paragraph G. 7. below, all ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other materials described in subsection F. 1. either created by or provided to RCTC in connection with the performance of this Agreement, other than advertisements and collateral material for the rideshare program and 511, or Documents and Data developed for the purpose of or otherwise subject to public disclosure, 18-1001950 Page 7 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 497 shall be held confidential by RCTC. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of SBCTA, be used by RCTC for any purposes other than the performance of the Services, or the operation of Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Programs, as described in G. 7. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the operation of Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Programs as described in G. 7. Nothing furnished to RCTC that is otherwise known to RCTC or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. RCTC shall not use SBCTA' s name or insignia, photographs of the project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of SBCTA, except as otherwise part of the regular operation and advertisement of the rideshare program and 511. 3. Use of Data. All Documents and Data, as defined above, shall be provided to SBCTA in electronic media. Documents and Data in electronic media shall be provided in a form that will allow SBCTA to use, access, and manipulate the data to prepare reports and perform other ride matching activities contemplated by this Agreement. All Documents and Data shall be provided to SBCTA within 30 days upon written notice. G. Confidential Information/Non-Disclosure. 1. Confidential Information. "Confidential Information" shall include: all user names, passwords, or other log -in credentials used, provided, or accessible in connection with the Software; all data or information accessible in connection with the Software; all source code, work product, proprietary information, server logs, technical information, trade secrets, and proprietary systems related to the Software; all personal information of Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Programs participants, including but not limited to a participant's residence address, employment address or hours of employment used for the purpose of assisting private entities in the establishment or implementation of carpooling or ridesharing programs and subject to California Penal Code Section 637.6, as well as names, biographical information, demographic information, use data, contact information, or similar personal information of participants; and any and all data, content, materials, documents and/or other information related to the Software and/or the Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction Rideshare Services designated, from time to time, in writing by RCTC as Confidential Information. 2. Non -Disclosure. Except as otherwise provided in Paragraph G. 7. below, or as required by law, both parties shall hold the Confidential Information in confidence, shall take reasonable precaution to protect and keep the Confidential Information confidential, shall not disclose the Confidential Information to any person or party not specifically authorized in writing by affected party to receive the Confidential Information, and shall not use the Confidential Information for any purpose other than as necessary to operate the Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Services. Further, neither party shall disclose a participant's personal information, including but not limited to a participant's residence address, 18-1001950 Page 8 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 employment address or hours of employment used for the purpose of assisting private entities in the establishment or implementation of carpooling or ridesharing programs, to any other person or use such information for purposes other than as necessary to operate the Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Services, without the prior written consent of the participant, as required by California Penal Code section 637.6. Parties shall limit access to the Confidential Information only to individuals who are directly involved in operation of the Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Services and shall further ensure that such individuals are legally bound to maintain the confidentiality of the Confidential Information on substantially the same terms as set forth herein. The foregoing restrictions on disclosure shall not apply to Confidential Information which is (a) already known by the recipient, (b) becomes, through no act or fault of the recipient, publicly known, (c) received by recipient from a third party without a restriction on disclosure or use, (d) independently developed by recipient without reference to the other party's Confidential Information, or (e) is required by law, or process of law, to be disclosed. This provision shall not be interpreted to limit, in any way, RCTC's ability to use the source code, work product, proprietary information, server logs, technical information, trade secrets, and proprietary systems related to the Software, and the parties acknowledge that the foregoing is the sole property of RCTC. 3. Expiration. Immediately upon (a) the expiration or termination of this Agreement, or (b) a request by a party, the other party shall turn over to requesting party all Confidential Information of or directly pertaining to the requesting party, as identified in Paragraph F. 1., and all documents or media containing any such Confidential Information, and any and all copies or extracts thereof, except that each party's legal counsel may retain one copy of all Confidential Information in its office solely for archival legal purposes. The foregoing shall not be interpreted to require RCTC to remove Regional Database Confidential Information to which SBCTA may be entitled a copy of from the Regional Database, nor to cease use of such information on termination of this Agreement, provided that such use is for operation of Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Programs. The Parties recognize that, pursuant to this provision, SBCTA may request copies of or export files from the Regional Database containing Confidential Information of commuters and employers participating in the IE Commuter program. SBCTA shall be solely responsible for maintaining the confidentiality and security of such data, and shall indemnify RCTC, pursuant to Section D. 1. (a) of this Agreement, for any claims arising out of SBCTA' s use or retention of such data. This obligation shall survive termination of this Agreement. 4. Key Personnel. SBCTA shall designate key personnel ("Key Personnel") requiring web based access to the Software for the operation of the Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Services, to receive from RCTC log -in information enabling access to the Software. Key Personnel shall use the log -in information provided by RCTC and all Confidential Information only and strictly for the operation of the Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Services and shall not disclose or share such log -in information, or any other Confidential Information, with any party, whether or not employed or 18-1001950 Page 9 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 in any way associated with SBCTA, who has not been specifically approved in writing by RCTC to receive such log -in information or other Confidential Information. 5. Non -Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreement. To protect RCTC's Confidential Information, SBCTA shall require each Key Personnel to execute a Non -Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreement substantially in the form of Attachment `B" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. SBCTA shall provide RCTC a signed Non -Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreement for each Key Personnel designated below or designated from time -to - time by SBCTA' s Executive Director or his designee prior to RCTC's disclosure of any log -in information or other Confidential Information to such Key Personnel. SBCTA hereby designates the following individuals as Key Personnel requiring web based access to the Software for the operation of the Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Programs: Kelly Lynn Chief of Air Quality & Mobility Programs Nicole Soto Management Analyst 6. This Paragraph G and all of its subparagraphs shall survive expiration or termination of the Agreement. 7. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, it shall not be a violation of RCTC's obligations under this Agreement to allow access to Confidential Information, or to the Regional Database by any Public Agency Participant for the purposes of allowing such agency to implement an Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction Rideshare program, provided that RCTC has entered into an agreement with such agency which requires the Public Agency Participant to comply with all confidentiality and nondisclosure requirements contained in this Agreement, and to indemnify all other Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction Rideshare program public agency participants related to any access and use of the Regional Database by the Public Agency Participant. H. Independent Contractor. SBCTA retains RCTC on an independent contractor basis and RCTC and its subconsultants shall not be employees of SBCTA. The subconsultants and other personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of RCTC shall at all times be under RCTC's exclusive direction and control. RCTC shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due its employees in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. RCTC shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such employees, including, but not limited to, social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. I. Attorneys' Fees and Costs. If any legal action is instituted to enforce or declare any party's rights hereunder, each party, including the prevailing party, must bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This paragraph shall not apply to those costs and attorneys' fees directly arising from any third party legal action against a party hereto and payable under Paragraph D, Indemnification and Insurance. 18-1001950 Page 10 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 500 J. Consent. Whenever consent or approval of any party is required under this Agreement, that party shall not unreasonably withhold nor delay such consent or approval. K. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. [Signatures on following page] 18-1001950 Page 11 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 501 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT 18-1001950 FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FISCAL YEAR 2018/2019 EMPLOYER AND COMMUTER TRIP REDUCTION/RIDESHARE PROGRAMS IN WITNESS THEREOF, THE AUTHORIZED PARTIES HAVE SIGNED AND EXECUTED THE AGREEMENT BELOW: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Alan Wapner, President APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Julianna K. Tillquist Assistant General Counsel CONCURRENCE: Jeffery Hill Procurement Manager Dana W. Reed, Chair APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Best, Best & Krieger, LLP, General Counsel 18-1001950 Page 12 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 502 Attachment "A" Scope of Work San Bernardino Employer and Commuter Assistance Programs Fiscal Year 2018-19 IE Commuter and IE511 San Bernardino County Transportation Authority's (SBCTA) and Riverside County Transportation Commissions (RCTC) IE Commuter rideshare and 511 programs provide a variety of services to employers and commuters, who participate in trip reduction activities. Activities shall include, but not be limited to: • Host and maintain the IE511.org and IECommuter.org websites, mobile device interfaces, social media platforms, and other regional products/outreach as assigned; • Respond and coordinate with SBCTA, as necessary, inquiries that are San Bernardino County specific and generated from 511, 1-866-RIDESHARE, and direct referrals; • Oversee and maintain a database of commuters specific to SBCTA's region, with SBCTA owning all Documents and Data (hard copy and electronic formats), as that term is defined in Section F. 1. of the Agreement; • Administer and provide technical assistance for the IE Commuter program including employer, employee, and end user account management, South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 2202 assistance including SCAQMD certified Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) calculations and coordinating and implementing employer surveys, ridematching, including dissemination and production of RideGuides both electronically and paper, incentive program management, production of output reports including analysis of survey results, and maintaining marketing logs and commuter trip data; • Coordination with other rideshare agencies and service providers to assist multi -site and multi jurisdictional employers and Employee Transportation Coordinators (ETC) within San Bernardino County as well as related worksites outside of the County; • Conducting ETC networking meetings, including two marketing workshops per year, a rideshare week kick-off event and recognition events; • Marketing to employers, employees, and end user commuters, including e-mail campaigns and newsletters, administering commuter promotions and incentives, graphic design for various collateral materials including but not limited to brochures, RideGuides, posters, banners, etc., web based advertising, and developing messaging for print, media, and social media advertising campaigns; • Support for employer and community events as well as transportation forums; • Market the regional Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH) Program to employers in San Bernardino County; • Maintain and increase SBCTA's leased Park and Ride lot program; 18-1001950 Page 13 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 503 " Operate the 511 program through phone and web services, providing enhancements, resolving issues, conducting marketing and periodic surveys; " Conduct IE Commuter and 511 special projects and studies as assigned, and work closely with SBCTA on all special projects and/or studies that impact SBCTA's rideshare and 511 programs. " RCTC is to advise at the start of and coordinate with SBCTA all potential enhancements, issues, and periodic surveys if such tasks could change/alter the current rideshare and/or 511 programs in San Bernardino County. " SBCTA staff will work closely with RCTC during the review and subsequent approval process of all rideshare and/or 511 marketing and communication plans, messaging development, media buys, advertising materials or any incentive outreach changes. " RCTC shall provide SBCTA with the following reports: i. Monthly IE Commuter Employer Activity Report for all employers with signed Employer Participation Agreements (Employer information, number of employees, etc.); ii. Monthly IE Commuter Program Performance Report (Incentives processed, number of registered commuters, etc.); iii. Quarterly IE Commuter Program Management Report (employer output, employer management, eRideGuides, contact management, IECommuter.org statistics and inquiries etc.); iv. Monthly 511 mobile app statistics; V. Monthly 511 calls and Interactive Voice Response statistical data; vi. Monthly IE51 Lorg statistics; and vii. Other newly developed reports/statistics as required. Goals and Performance Measures: 1. Implementation of commuter assistance programs to approximately 500 regulated and non -regulated employer worksites in San Bernardino County, to assist in the development and implementation of trip reduction programs and for technical assistance. 2. Work with approximately 175 employers on AVR/Transportation surveys and AVR calculations. 3. Maintain an accurate database of approximately 50,000 active San Bernardino County commuter registrants, resulting from completed commuter surveys. 4. Disseminate approximately 9,000 Ride Guides to San Bernardino County commuters from San Bernardino County worksites. 5. Provide assistance to multi-site/multi-jurisdictional headquarters located in San Bernardino County that may represent worksites in San Bernardino, Riverside, Los Angeles and Orange counties. 6. Develop and implement two employer transportation network marketing meetings, one rideshare week kick-off event and ongoing promotional marketing campaigns at San Bernardino employer worksites, and other events. 7. Produce and disseminate other regional marketing materials as standalone campaigns within the San Bernardino and Riverside counties or as regional campaigns in coordination with neighboring County Transportation Commissions. 18-1001950 Page 14 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 504 8. Respond to approximately 2,000 inquires/calls from commuters who work or reside in San Bernardino or Riverside counties, via 1-866-RIDESHARE, 511, direct referrals, and other internet sources. Of these 2,000 inquiries, approximately 200 RideGuides will be generated. In addition, approximately 575 Inland residents will register in the database via the IECommuter.org website. 9. Manage and operate the 511 system which will be available to commuters 24 hours a day, 7 days per week, 365 days per year. 10. The 511 phone system will provide assistance to approximately 25,000 callers per month throughout the year. The system will have the capacity to handle approximately 100,000 concurrent callers. 11. The IE511.org website will potentially receive approximately 40,000 unique visitors per month. Website will be able to handle approximately 100,000 concurrent users. 12. Continue 511 marketing/outreach and coordinating development of the marketing plan, campaign themes, surveys, studies and potential collateral materials for San Bernardino County with SBCTA staff, before the tasks are implemented. 13. Conduct and coordinate periodic surveys with SBCTA staff to determine the 511 program use, effectiveness and customer satisfaction. 14. Provide IE511 website, phone, and mobile application enhancements/upgrades as needed. 15. Collaboratively with SBCTA, explore possible opportunities to improve the 511 system for the motorists and residents of both counties. Rideshare Incentive Programs The IE Commuter $2/day Rideshare Incentive offers San Bernardino County residents who commute to work up to $2 a day (in gift cards) for each day they participate in a rideshare mode, during a three-month period. The IE Commuter Rideshare Plus program provides ongoing rideshare participants who reside in San Bernardino County a Rideshare Plus rewards book with discounts to local merchants, plus 200,000 additional discounts available online. RCTC is responsible for managing and operating the incentive programs listed above, and coordinating discussions with SBCTA when potential changes to the programs are being considered. Goals and Performance Measures: 1. The $2/day Rideshare Incentive program will enlist 1,100 San Bernardino County residents who commute to work. These participants have, on average, a one-way commute distance of 27.59 miles, and the goal is to reduce 109,000 one-way vehicle trips from the roadways. 2. The Rideshare Plus program will enlist approximately 2,000 San Bernardino County residents who commute to work, when the program is at its highest membership over the 18- month program period. 18-1001950 Page 15 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 505 Attachment "B" NON -DISCLOSURE AND CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT This Non -Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreement is entered into as of , 2018, by and between SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ("SBCTA") and the undersigned interested party ("Interested Party"). SBCTA and Interested Party shall individually be referred to as a "Party" or collectively as the "Parties". 1. RECITALS 1.1 WHEREAS, SBCTA and the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("RCTC") entered into that certain Implementation of San Bernardino County Fiscal Year 2018/2019 Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Programs Agreement dated July 1, 2018 ("Agreement"). 1.2 WHEREAS, in the Agreement, SBCTA has designated approved key personnel requiring access to the web based software ("Software") implementing the Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Programs to receive log -in information for the Software. 1.3 WHEREAS, in the Agreement, SBCTA has agreed to protect the personal information accessible through the Software of public participants in the Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Programs, and has agreed to obtain non -disclosure and confidentiality agreements with all approved key personnel receiving access to the Software. 1.4 WHEREAS, SBCTA has designated Interested Party as a Key Personnel to receive Confidential Information, as those terms are defined in Agreement, and Interested Party desires to receive and protect the Confidential Information upon the terms and conditions set forth herein. 2. TERMS 2.1 Confidential Information. "Confidential Information" shall include: all user names, passwords, or other log -in credentials used, provided, or accessible in connection with the Software; all data or information accessible in connection with the Software; all source code, work product, proprietary information, server logs, technical information, trade secrets, and proprietary systems related to the Software; all market research, financial data, operating procedures, and third party confidential and proprietary information; all personal information of Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Programs participants, including but not limited a participants residence address, employment address or hours of employment used for the purpose of assisting private entities in the establishment or implementation of carpooling or ridesharing programs and subject to California Penal Code section 637.6, as well as names, biographical information, demographic information, use data, contact information, or similar personal information of participants; and any and all data, content, materials, documents and/or other information related to the Software and/or Employer and Commuter Trip 18-1001950 Page 16 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 506 Reduction/Rideshare Programs designated, from time to time, by RCTC as confidential information. 2.2 Interested Party shall hold the Confidential Information in confidence, shall take reasonable precaution to protect and keep the Confidential Information confidential, shall not disclose the Confidential Information to any person or party not specifically authorized in writing by RCTC to receive the Confidential Information, or as and to the extent required by law or legal process, and shall not use the Confidential Information for any purpose other than as necessary to operate the Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Programs. Further, Interested Party shall not disclose a participant's personal information, including but not limited to a participant's residence address, employment address or hours of employment used for the purpose of assisting private entities in the establishment or implementation of carpooling or ridesharing programs, to any other person or use such information for purpose other than as necessary to operate the Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Programs without the prior written consent of the participant as required by California Penal Code section 637.6. Interested Party shall limit access to the Confidential Information only to individuals who are directly involved in operation of the Employer and Commuter Trip Reduction/Rideshare Programs and shall further ensure that such individuals are legally bound to maintain the confidentiality of the Confidential Information on substantially the same terms as set forth herein. The foregoing restrictions on disclosure shall not apply to Confidential Information which is (a) already known by the recipient, (b) becomes, through no act or fault of the recipient, publicly known, (c) received by recipient from a third party without a restriction on disclosure or use, or (d) independently developed by recipient without reference to the other party's Confidential Information. 2.3 Immediately upon (i) the expiration or termination of Interested Party's employment or association with SBCTA, (ii) the expiration or termination of the Agreement, or (iii) a request by RCTC, Interested Party shall turn over to RCTC all Confidential Information and all documents or media containing any such Confidential Information and any and all copies or extracts thereof. 2.4 RCTC is an express third party beneficiary of this Non -Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreement. -----------------------------------SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE ------------------------- 18-1001950 Page 17 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 507 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Non -Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreement on the date first written above. SBCTA INTERESTED PARTY By: Raymond W. Wolfe, PhD Executive Director Name: 18-1001950 Page 18 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 Attachment "C" Federal Flow Down Provisions ARTICLE I -- FISCAL PROVISIONS A. The Cost Principles and Procedures set forth in 48 CFR Ch. 1, Subch. E, Part 31, as constituted on the effective date of this Contract shall be utilized to determine allowability of costs under this Contract and may be modified from time to time by written amendment of the Contract. B. RCTC agrees to comply with Federal Department of Transportation procedures in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. C. Any costs for which payment has been made to RCTC that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowed under 48 CFR, Ch.1, Subch E, Part 31, Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, or 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards shall be repaid by RCTC to Agency. SBCTA shall then repay RCTC for such costs, if such costs are for the Services, using local funds. ARTICLE II — AUDITS, THIRD PARTY CONTRACTING, RECORDS RETENTION AND REPORTS A. RCTC agrees that any and all subcontractors of RCTC performing Work under this Agreement will comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement applicable to the portion of Work performed by them. CONSULTANT shall incorporate the following applicable provisions of this Agreement into their subcontracts regardless of the tier: Article I -- Fiscal Provisions, and this Article II -- Audits, Third Party Contracting, Records Retention and Reports. B. RCTC shall provide SBCTA, or authorized representatives or agents of SBCTA, including but not limited to Caltrans, Federal Transit Administration (FTA) or Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), access to CONSULTANT's records that are directly related to this Agreement for the purpose of inspection, auditing or copying. RCTC shall maintain all records related to this Agreement in an organized way in the original format, electronic and hard copy, conducive to professional review and audit, for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment by SBCTA, except in the event of litigation or settlement of claims arising out of this Agreement in which case RCTC agrees to maintain records through the conclusion of all such litigation, appeals or claims related to this Agreement. RCTC further agrees to maintain separate records for costs of work performed by amendment. RCTC shall allow SBCTA, Caltrans, FHWA, FTA or any duly authorized agents to reproduce any materials as reasonably necessary. 18-1001950 Page 19 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 509 D. The cost proposal and/or invoices for this Agreement are subject to audit by SBCTA and/or any state or federal agency funding this Project at any time. After RCTC receives any audit recommendations, the cost proposal shall be adjusted by RCTC and approved by SBCTA' s Project Manager to conform to the audit recommendations. RCTC agrees that individual items of cost identified in the audit report may be incorporated into the Agreement at SBCTA' s sole discretion. Refusal by RCTC to incorporate the audit or post award recommendations will be considered a breach of the Agreement and cause for termination of the Agreement. Any dispute concerning the audit findings of this Agreement shall be reviewed by SBCTA' s Chief Financial Officer. RCTC may request a review by submitting the request in writing to SBCTA within thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the audit report. SBCTA shall pay all costs related to the audit. Further, a breach under this clause shall not imply any wrongdoing by RCTC. SBCTA shall pay RCTC for work completed up to the date of termination if such costs are for the Services. As determined necessary by SBCTA, such payment will be made using local funds. E. RCTC agrees that RCTC's travel and per diem reimbursements and third -party contract reimbursements to subcontractors will be allowable as Project Costs only after those costs are incurred and paid for by the subcontractors. ARTICLE III. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY During the term of this Agreement, RCTC shall not willfully discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, gender, marital status, sexual orientation, age, political affiliation or disability. RCTC agrees to comply with the provisions of Executive Orders 11246, 11375, 11625, 12138, 12432, 12250, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the California Fair Employment Practices Act and other applicable Federal, State and County laws and regulations and policies relating to equal employment and contracting opportunities, including laws and regulations hereafter enacted. ARTICLE IV. GENERAL A. Subcontracts must include provisions for terminating the subcontract for cause or convenience by SBCTA. SBCTA' s own preferred language may be used. B. Subcontracts must include administrative, contractual or legal remedies in instances of the subcontractor violating or breaching the Agreement terms. ARTICLE V. COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT RCTC shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Americans With Disabilities Act in performing Work under this Agreement. 18-1001950 Page 20 of 20 1733 6.00013\30999357.2 510 AGENDA ITEM 8S RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT. Agreements with the South Coast Air Quality Management District for Vanpool and Freeway Service Patrol Projects STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 18-41-154-00 with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) for $1.5 million to fund ongoing vanpool subsidies; 2) Approve Agreement No. 18-45-155-00 with the AQMD for $500,000 to fund incremental weekend Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) service; and 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC), a committee of the AQMD, set aside $8 million under its California Transportation Commission Partnership Program (CTC Program) for projects and/or programs designed to improve air quality. The Commission's share of the $8 million allocation is $2 million. Examples of eligible project categories include traffic signal coordination, rdeshare programs, car sharing/bike sharing projects, active transportation projects, transit pass incentive programs, FSP, first mile/last mile strategies, transit center infrastructure, and information technology projects. Staff requests approval to receive MSRC funding for vanpool and FSP projects, in the amounts of $1.5 million and $500,000, respectively. While much of the Commission's work focuses on improving transportation infrastructure, there is significant value in ensuring the transportation systems in Riverside County are used efficiently. Rideshare and other commuter transportation demand management (TDM) programs are a vital tool for the region as they can significantly decrease the number of vehicles traveling on congested corridors and save thousands of pounds of pollutants from being emitted into the air each year. As such, the $1.5 million MSRC funding request will be applied to jumpstart the Commission's vanpool program launching this summer, which provides a new vanpool monthly subsidy of 50 percent of the monthly vanpool lease costs, not to exceed $400 a month per vanpool. With the help of the MSRC contribution, the vanpool program anticipates enrolling Agenda Item 8S 511 224 vanpools by the end of Fiscal Year 2019/20. Given that most vanpool passengers are former single occupant vehicle travelers, vanpools result in significant regional benefits which include a reduction in traffic, less stress for commuters, and improved air quality. FSP is another element the Commission deploys resulting in reduced air pollution as a result of reduced congestion. FSP consists of continuously roving tow trucks servicing designated freeway segments to relieve freeway congestion and facilitate the rapid removal of small debris, disabled vehicles as well as vehicles involved in minor accidents on local freeways. In addition to providing congestion relief and improved safety, FSP provides significant savings with respect to hours of delay and fuel consumption thereby reducing the amount of vehicle emissions. Traditional funding for FSP available through Caltrans and the Riverside County Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies revenues constrains service levels to the busiest segments of Riverside County during morning and evening commutes on weekdays only. However, similar congestion patterns are increasingly experienced on the weekends as well. The MSRC currently funds weekend FSP service along State Route 91 (Beats 1 & 2 Corona) from the Orange County line to Interstate 15. The $500,000 MSRC funding request will be applied to expand weekend service along SR-91 (Beat 4 Riverside) from Magnolia Avenue to the 60/91/215 interchange and along the SR-60 (Beat 8 Riverside/Moreno Valley) from Central Avenue to Theodore Street. These segments were prioritized based on analysis performed applying a statewide model used to project the cost benefit for a given beat. SAN BERNARDINO CO. w` Jurupa�� Valley RIVERSIDE CO. Eastvale Beat 4 ��� Beat 8 a New Weekend Service New Weekend Service Norco Morena Bea s 1 &2 Riuersia Valley Existing eekend Se u, 'March ARB ake I—. opt% Corona �' ® ears y Perris Lake F F Matthews 00 OO Indian Truck Trail Ethanac Rd' Agenda Item 8S 512 Staff recommends approval of Agreement Nos. 18-41-154-00 and 18-45-155-00 in amounts not to exceed $1.5 million for vanpool subsidies and $500,000 for weekend FSP service, respectively, as reimbursements to the Commission. Financial Information Yes FY 2017/18 $42,400 In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2018/19 Amount: $609,600 N/A FY 2019/20+ $1,348,000 No Source of Funds: MSRC Grants Budget Adjustment: No N/A 002187 416 41608 0000 263 4141204 (vanpool) GLA No.: 0 22173 416 41608 0000 20145 41204 (FSP) Fiscal Procedures Approved: �� Date: 05/25/2018 Attachments: 1) AQMD Agreement No. 18-41-154-00 2) AQMD Agreement No. 18-45-155-00 Agenda Item 8S 513 ��, n //ATTACHMENT 1 Clean Transportation Funding from the MSRC Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee www.CIeanTransportationFund!ng.org May 16, 2018 Brian Cunanan Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission PO Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Dear Mr. Cunanan: 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 909.396.3269 Enclosed please find two copies of Contract No. MS18024 for signature by RCTC. Please have the appropriate signatory sign the signature page provided in each, and return both copies to: Matthew Mackenzie MSRC/AB2766 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 If we do not receive the signed contract within 12 months from the date of this letter, we reserve the right to terminate negotiations. If negotiations are terminated, the amounts previously awarded will revert to the AB 2766 Discretionary Fund. After the contract has been executed by this agency, I will return one copy for your files. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this contract. Sincerely, Matthew Mackenzie MSRC Contracts Administration (909) 396-2164 Encl MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS: California Air Resources Board " Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority " Orange County Transportation Authority " Riverside County Transportation Commission " San Bernardino Couty Transportation Authority " South Coast Air Quality Management District " Southern California Assocl 1W, of Governments " Regional Ridesharing Agency affil South Coast Clean ontract No. MS18024 Transportation MW Air Quality Management District I Funding from the MSSRC AB 27661MSRC COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM CONTRACT PARTIES - The parties to this Contract are the South Coast Air Quality Management District (hereinafter referred to as "SCAQMD") whose address is 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765-4178, and the Riverside County Transportation Commission (hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR") whose address is 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California 92502. 2, RECITALS A. SCAQMD is the local agency with primary responsibility for regulating stationary source air pollution within the geographical boundaries of the South Coast Air Quality Management District in the State of California (State). SCAQMD is authorized under State Health & Safety Code Section 44225 (AB 2766) to levy a fee on motor vehicles for the purpose of reducing air pollution from such vehicles and to implement the California Clean Air Act. B. Under AB 2766, SCAQMD's Governing Board has authorized the imposition of the statutorily set motor vehicle fee. By taking such action, the State's Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) is required to collect such fee and remit it periodically to SCAQMD. C. AB 2766 further mandates that thirty (30) percent of such vehicle registration fees be placed by SCAQMD into a separate account for the sole purpose of implementing and monitoring programs to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles. D. AB 2766 creates a regional Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) to develop a work program to fund projects from the separate account. Pursuant to approval of the work program by SCAQMD's Governing Board, SCAQMD authorized this Contract with CONTRACTOR for equipment or services described in Attachment 1 - Statement of Work, expressly incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof of this Contract. E. CONTRACTOR has met the requirements for receipt of AB 2766 Discretionary Funds as set forth in CONTRACTOR's County Transportation Commissions Partnership Program Application dated December 15, 2017. F. CONTRACTOR is authorized to do business in the State of California and attests that it is in good tax standing with the California Franchise Tax Board, G. All parties to this Contract have had the opportunity to have this Contract reviewed by their attorney. 3. DMV FEES - CONTRACTOR acknowledges that SCAQMD cannot guarantee that the amount of fees to be collected under AB 2766 will be sufficient to fund this Contract. CONTRACTOR further acknowledges that payment under this Contract is contingent upon SCAQMD receiving sufficient funds from the DMV, and that SCAQMD assumes no responsibility for the collection and remittance of motor vehicle registration fees. AUDIT AND RECORDS RETENTION A. CONTRACTOR shall, at least once every two years, or within two years of the termination of the Contract if the term is less than two years, be subject to an audit by SCAQMD or its authorized representative to determine if the revenues received by CONTRACTOR were spent for the reduction of pollution from motor vehicles pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1988, B. CONTRACTOR agrees to maintain records related to this Contract during the Contract term and continue to retain these records for a period of two years beyond the Contract term, except that in no 1 515 Contract No. MS18024 case shall CONTRACTOR be required to retain more than the most recent five years' records. SCAQMD shall coordinate such audit through CONTRACTOR'S audit staff. C. If an amount is found to be inappropriately expended, SCAQMD may withhold funding, or seek reimbursement, from CONTRACTOR in the amount equal to the amount that was inappropriately expended. Such withholding shall not be construed as SCAQMD's sole remedy and shall not relieve CONTRACTOR of its obligation to perform under the terms of this Contract, 5. TERM - The term of this Contract is for thirty eight (38) months from the date of execution by both parties, unless terminated earlier as provided for in the TERMINATION clause of this Contract, or the term is extended by amendment of this Contract in writing, No work shall commence prior to the Contract start date, except at CONTRACTOR's cost and risk, and no charges are authorized until this Contract is fully executed, subject to the provisions stated in the PRE -CONTRACT COSTS clause of this Contract. 6. SUCCESSORS -IN -INTEREST - This Contract, and the obligations arising under the Contract, shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of CONTRACTOR and their executors, administrators, successors, and assigns. 7. REPORTING - CONTRACTOR shall submit reports to SCAQMD as outlined in Attachment 1 - Statement of Work. SCAQMD reserves the right to review, comment, and request changes to any report produced as a result of this Contract. 8. TERMINATION A. In the event any party fails to comply with any term or condition of this Contract, or fails to provide services in the manner agreed upon by the parties, including, but not limited to, the requirements of Attachment 1 — Statement of Work, this failure shall constitute a breach of this Contract. The non - breaching party shall notify the breaching party that it must cure this breach or provide written notification of its intention to terminate this contract. Notification shall be provided in the manner set forth in the NOTICES clause of this Contract. The non -breaching party reserves all rights under law and equity to enforce this Contract and recover damages. B. SCAQMD reserves the right to terminate this Contract, in whole or in part, without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice. Once such notice has been given, CONTRACTOR shall, except as and to the extent or directed otherwise by SCAQMD, discontinue any Work being performed under this Contract and cancel any of CONTRACTOR's orders for materials, facilities, and supplies in connection with such Work, and shall use its best efforts to procure termination of existing subcontracts upon terms satisfactory to SCAQMD, Thereafter, CONTRACTOR shall perform only such services as may be necessary to preserve and protect any Work already in progress and to dispose of any property as requested by SCAQMD. C. CONTRACTOR shall be paid in accordance with this Contract for all Work performed before the effective date of termination under section B of the TERMINATION clause of this Contract. Before expiration of the thirty (30) days' written notice, CONTRACTOR shall promptly deliver to SCAQMD all copies of documents and other information and data prepared or developed by CONTRACTOR under this Contract with the exception of a record copy of such materials, which may be retained by CONTRACTOR, 9. STOP WORK - SCAQMD may, at any time, by written notice to CONTRACTOR, require CONTRACTOR to stop all or any part of the Statement of Work tasks in this Contract. A stop work order may be issued for reasons including, but not limited to, the project exceeding the budget, out of scope work, delay in project schedule, or misrepresentations. Upon receipt of the stop work order, CONTRACTOR shall immediately 2 516 Contract No. MS18024 take all necessary steps to comply with the order. CONTRACTOR shall resume the work only upon receipt of written instructions from SCAQMD cancelling the stop work order. CONTRACTOR agrees and understands that CONTRACTOR will not be paid for performing work while the stop work order is in effect, unless SCAQMD agrees to do so in its written cancellation of the stop work order, 10. INSURANCE A. CONTRACTOR shall furnish evidence to SCAQMD of workers' compensation insurance for each of its employees, in accordance with either California or other states' applicable statutory requirements prior to commencement of any work on this Contract, B. CONTRACTOR shall furnish evidence to SCAQMD of general liability insurance with a limit of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence, and $2,000,000 in a general aggregate prior to commencement of any work on this Contract, SCAQMD shall be named as an additional insured on any such liability policy, and thirty (30) days written notice prior to cancellation of any such insurance shall be given by CONTRACTOR to SCAQMD, C. CONTRACTOR shall furnish evidence to SCAQMD of automobile liability insurance with limits of at least $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident for bodily injuries, and $50,000 in property damage, or $1,000,000 combined single limit for bodily injury or property damage, prior to commencement of any work on this Contract. SCAQMD shall be named as an additional insured on any such liability policy, and thirty (30) days written notice prior to cancellation of any such insurance shall be given by CONTRACTOR to SCAQMD. D. If CONTRACTOR fails to maintain the required insurance coverage set forth above, SCAQMD reserves the right either to purchase such additional insurance and to deduct the cost thereof from any payments owed to CONTRACTOR or terminate this Contract for breach. E. All insurance certificates shall be mailed to: SCAQMD, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765- 4178, Attention: Cynthia Ravenstein, MSRC Contracts Administrator. The SCAQMD Contract Number must be included on the face of the certificate. F. CONTRACTOR must provide updates on the insurance coverage throughout the term of the Contract to ensure that there is no break in coverage during the period of contract performance. Failure to provide evidence of current coverage shall be grounds for termination for breach of Contract. 11. INDEMNIFICATION - CONTRACTOR agrees to hold harmless, defend and indemnify SCAQMD, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and successors -in -interest against any and all loss, damage, costs, lawsuits, claims, demands, causes of action, judgments, attorney's fees, or any other expenses arising from or related to any third party claim against SCAQMD, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, or successors in interest that arise or result in whole or in part, from any actual or alleged act or omission of CONTRACTOR, its employees, subcontractors, agents or representatives in the performance of this Contract, This Indemnification Clause shall survive the expiration or termination (for any reason) of the Contract and shall remain in full force and effect. 12. PAYMENT A. SCAQMD shall reimburse CONTRACTOR up to a total amount of One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) in accordance with Attachment 2 — Cost Schedule expressly incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof of the Contract. B. A withhold amount or percentage (if any) shall be identified in the Cost Schedule, and such amount shall be withheld from each invoice. Upon satisfactory completion of project and final acceptance of work and the final report, CONTRACTOR's invoice for the withheld amount shall be released. Proof of project completion shall include a Final Report detailing the project goals and accomplishments, data collected 3 517 Contract No. MS18024 during project performance, if any, documentation of significant results, and emissions reduction input data needed for calculation of emissions reductions. C. Any funds not expended upon early Contract termination or Contract completion shall revert to the AB 2766 Discretionary Fund. Payment of charges shall be made by SCAQMD to CONTRACTOR within thirty (30) days after approval by SCAQMD of an itemized invoice prepared and furnished by CONTRACTOR. D. An invoice submitted to SCAQMD for payment must be prepared in duplicate, on company letterhead, and list SCAQMD's contract number, period covered by invoice, and CONTRACTOR's social security number or Employer Identification Number and submitted to: South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 Attn: Cynthia Ravenstein, MSRC Contracts Administrator 1. Charges for equipment, material, and supply costs, travel expenses, subcontractors, and other charges, as applicable, must be itemized by CONTRACTOR. Reimbursement for equipment, material, supplies, subcontractors, and other charges, as applicable, shall be made at actual cost. Supporting documentation must be provided for all individual charges (with the exception of direct labor charges provided by CONTRACTOR), 2. SCAQMD shall pay CONTRACTOR for travel -related expenses only if such travel is expressly set forth in Attachment 2 — Cost Schedule of this Contract or pre -authorized by SCAQMD in writing. 3. CONTRACTOR's failure to provide receipts shall be grounds for SCAQMD's non -reimbursement of such charges. CONTRACTOR may reduce payments on invoices by those charges for which receipts were not provided. 4. CONTRACTOR must submit final invoice no later than ninety (90) days after the termination date of this Contract or invoice may not be paid. 13. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS - CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations and orders of public authorities in the performance of this Contract. CONTRACTOR must also ensure that the vehicles and/or equipment to be purchased, leased or installed is in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local air quality rules and regulations, and that it will maintain compliance for the full Contract term. CONTRACTOR shall ensure that the provisions of this clause are included in all subcontracts, 14. MOBILE SOURCE EMISSION REDUCTION CREDITS (MSERCs) A. The MSRC has adopted a policy that no MSERCs resulting from AB 2766 Discretionary Funds may be generated and/or sold. B. CONTRACTOR has the opportunity to generate MSERCs as a by-product of the project if a portion of the air quality benefits attributable to the project resulted from funding sources other than AB2766. These MSERCs, which are issued by SCAQMD, are based upon the quantified vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by project vehicles or other activity data as appropriate. Therefore, a portion of prospective MSERCs, generated as a result of AB 2766 Funds, must be retired. The portion of prospective credits funded by the AB 2766 program, and which are subject to retirement, shall be referred to as "AB 2766- MSERCs." C. The determination of AB 2766-MSERC's is to be prorated based upon the AB 2766 program's contribution to the cost associated with the air quality benefits. In the case where AB 2766 Discretionary Funds are used to pay for the full differential cost of a new alternative fuel vehicle or for the retrofitting or 518 Contract No. MS18024 repowering of an existing vehicle, all MSERCs attributable to AB 2766 Discretionary Funds must be retired. The determination of AB 2766-MSERCs for infrastructure and other ancillary items is to be prorated based upon the AB 2766 program's contribution to the associated air quality benefits, Determination of the project's overall cost will be on a case -by -case basis at the time an MSERC application is submitted. SCAQMD staff, at the time an MSERC application is submitted, will calculate total MSERCs and retire the AB 2766-MSERCs. CONTRACTOR would then receive the balance of the MSERCs not associated with AB 2766 funding. 15. NOTICES - All notices that are required under this Contract shall be provided in the manner set forth herein, unless specified otherwise. Notice to a party shall be delivered to the attention of the person listed below, or to such other person or persons as may hereafter be designated by that party in writing. Notice shall be in writing sent by email, U.S. Mail, express, certified, return receipt requested, or a nationally recognized overnight courier service. In the case of email communications, valid notice shall be deemed to have been delivered upon sending, provided the sender obtained an electronic confirmation of delivery. Email communications shall be deemed to have been received on the date of such transmission, provided such date was a business day (Tuesday -Friday) and delivered prior to 5:30pm Pacific Standard Time. Otherwise, receipt of email communications shall be deemed to have occurred on the following business day. In the case of U.S. Mail notice, notice shall be deemed to be received when delivered or five (5) business days after deposit in the U. S. Mail. In the case of a nationally recognized overnight courier service, notice shall be deemed received when delivered (written receipt of delivery), SCAQMD: South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 Attn: Cynthia Ravenstein, MSRC Contracts Administrator, email: cravenstein@agmd.gov CONTRACTOR: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92502 Attn: Brian Cunanan, email: bcunanan rctc.orq 16. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR - CONTRACTOR is an independent contractor, CONTRACTOR, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, or subcontractors shall in no sense be considered employees or agents of SCAQMD, nor shall CONTRACTOR, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, or subcontractors be entitled to or eligible to participate in any benefits, privileges, or plans, given or extended by SCAQMD to its employees. SCAQMD will not supervise, direct, or have control over, or be responsible for, CONTRACTOR's or subcontractor's means, methods, techniques, work sequences or procedures, or for the safety precautions and programs incident thereto, or for any failure by them to comply with any local, state, or federal laws, or rules or regulations, including state minimum wage laws and OSHA requirements, 17. SUBCONTRACTOR APPROVAL - If CONTRACTOR intends to subcontract all or a portion of the work under this Contract, then CONTRACTOR must first obtain written approval from SCAQMD's Executive Officer or designee prior to subcontracting any work, Any material changes to the subcontract(s) that affect the scope of work, deliverable schedule, and/or payment/cost schedule shall also require the prior written approval of 5 519 Contract No. MS18024 the SCAQMD Executive Officer or designee. No subcontract charges will be reimbursed unless the required approvals have been obtained from SCAQMD. 18. OWNERSHIP - Title and full ownership rights to any equipment purchased under this Contract shall at all times remain with CONTRACTOR, 19. NON-DISCRIMINATION - In the performance of this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall not discriminate in recruiting, hiring, promotion, demotion, or termination practices on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age, or physical handicap and shall comply with the provisions of the California Fair Employment & Housing Act (Government Code Section 12900, et seq.), the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) and all amendments thereto, Executive Order No. 11246 (30 Federal Register 12319), and all administrative rules and regulations issued pursuant to said Acts and Order. CONTRACTOR shall likewise require each subcontractor to comply with this clause and shall include in each such subcontract language similar to this clause. 20. CITIZENSHIP AND ALIEN STATUS A. CONTRACTOR warrants that it fully complies with all laws regarding the employment of aliens and others, and that its employees performing services hereunder meet the citizenship or alien status requirements contained in federal and state statutes and regulations including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-603). CONTRACTOR shall obtain from all covered employees performing services hereunder all verification and other documentation of employees' eligibility status required by federal statutes and regulations as they currently exist and as they may be hereafter amended. CONTRACTOR shall have a continuing obligation to verify and document the continuing employment authorization and authorized alien status of employees performing services under this Contract to insure continued compliance with all federal statutes and regulations. Notwithstanding the above, CONTRACTOR, in the performance of this Contract, shall not discriminate against any person in violation of 8 USC Section 1324b. B. CONTRACTOR shall retain such documentation for all covered employees for the period described by law. CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless SCAQMD, its officers and employees from employer sanctions and other liability which may be assessed against CONTRACTOR or SCAQMD, or both in connection with any alleged violation of federal statutes or regulations pertaining to the eligibility for employment of persons performing services under this Contract. 21, NON -EFFECT OF WAIVER - The failure of CONTRACTOR or SCAQMD to insist upon the performance of any or all of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this Contract, or failure to exercise any rights or remedies hereunder, shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of the future performance of any such terms, covenants, or conditions, or of the future exercise of such rights or remedies, unless otherwise provided for herein. 22. TAX IMPLICATIONS FROM RECEIPT OF MSRC FUNDS - CONTRACTOR is advised to consult a tax attorney regarding potential tax implications from receipt of MSRC funds. 23. ATTORNEYS' FEES - In the event any action is filed in connection with the enforcement or interpretation of this Contract, each party in said action shall pay its own attorneys' fees and costs. 24. FORCE MAJEURE - Neither SCAQMD nor CONTRACTOR shall be liable or deemed to be in default for any delay or failure in performance under this Contract or interruption of services resulting, directly or indirectly, from acts of God, civil or military authority, acts of public enemy, war, strikes, labor disputes, shortages of 6 520 Contract No. MS18024 suitable parts, materials, labor or transportation, or any similar cause beyond the reasonable control of SCAQMD or CONTRACTOR. 25. SEVERABILITY - In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained in this Contract shall for any reason be held to be unenforceable in any respect by a court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect any other provisions of this Contract, and the Contract shall then be construed as if such unenforceable provisions are not a part hereof, 26. HEADINGS - Headings on the clauses of this Contract are for convenience and reference only, and the words contained therein shall in no way be held to explain, modify, amplify, or aid in the interpretation, construction, or meaning of the provisions of this Contract. 27, DUPLICATE EXECUTION - This Contract is executed in duplicate. Each signed copy shall have the force and effect of an original. 28. GOVERNING LAW - This Contract shall be construed and interpreted and the legal relations created thereby shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Venue for resolution of any disputes under this Contract shall be Los Angeles County, California. 29. PRE -CONTRACT COSTS - Any costs incurred by CONTRACTOR prior to CONTRACTOR receipt of a fully executed Contract shall be incurred solely at the risk of the CONTRACTOR. In the event that a formal Contract is not executed, neither the MSRC nor the SCAQMD shall be liable for any amounts expended in anticipation of a formal Contract. If a formal Contract does result, pre -contract cost expenditures authorized by the Contract will be reimbursed in accordance with the Cost Schedule and payment provision of the Contract. 30. CHANGE TERMS - Changes to any part of this Contract must be requested in writing by CONTRACTOR and approved by MSRC in accordance with MSRC policies and procedures. CONTRACTOR must make requests a minimum of 90 days prior to desired effective date of change. All modifications to this Contract shall be in writing and signed by the authorized representatives of the parties. Fueling station location changes shall not be approved under any circumstances, 31. ENTIRE CONTRACT - This Contract represents the entire agreement between CONTRACTOR and SCAQMD. There are no understandings, representations, or warranties of any kind except as expressly set forth herein. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions herein shall be binding on any party unless in writing and signed by the authorized representative of the party against whom enforcement of such waiver, alteration, or modification is sought. 32. AUTHORITY - The signator hereto represents and warrants that he or she is authorized and empowered and has the legal capacity to execute this Contract and to legally bind CONTRACTOR both in an operational and financial capacity and that the requirements and obligations under this Contract are legally enforceable and binding on CONTRACTOR. 7 521 Contract No. MS18024 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Contract have caused this Contract to be duly executed on their behalf by their authorized representatives. SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Dr. William A. Burke, Chairman, Governing Board Date ATTEST: Denise Garzaro, Clerk of the Board By: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Bayron T. Gilchrist, General Counsel By. Ax4o-a�—D //MSRC Master Boilerplate Revised March 29, 2018 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: Name: Title: Date: 8 522 Attachment 1 Statement of Work Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number MS18024 Project Description The purpose of this contract is to expand and extend vanpool participation in the western Riverside County portion of the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) through the development, implementation and administration of a regional commuter vanpool program, called VanClub, by Riverside County Transportation Commission, hereinafter referred to as CONTRACTOR. The goal for VanClub is to facilitate, through the availability of financial incentives, the creation or continuance of approximately 220 commuter vanpools. Vanpools may be leased through the California Vanpool Authority (CalVans) or through Enterprise Rideshare, the third -party vendor selected by CONTRACTOR. Using funds provided by SCAQMD, on behalf of the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC), CONTRACTOR shall develop and implement VanClub. For the purposes of this contract, the following definitions shall apply: Eligible Commuters: a. individuals participating in a vanpool for the purpose of commuting to and from their place of employment, a farm/agricultural worksite, and/or a vocational/post-secondary educational destination; b. begin or end their trip within Western Riverside County; c. travel at least 30 miles round trip each day; d. do not receive financial incentives to participate in a vanpool from any other source during those months for which they receive incentives from the regional vanpool program. Vanpool: five to fifteen Eligible Commuters commuting on a regular basis by means of a single vehicle with seating arrangements designed to carry seven to fifteen adults. Minimum startup requirement is 70% of the vehicle's capacity. Western Riverside County: From Banning in the east to Corona to the west, and from Riverside in the north to Temecula to the south (See Attachment 3, Map of the VanClub Service Area). Statement of Work Task I: Planning and Design CONTRACTOR shall design the VanClub regional vanpool program, including but not limited to: a) development of program implementation guidelines; b) development of a participation agreement for entities receiving incentive funds; c) marketing plan, including outreach activities; d) methodology for delivery of incentives and invoicing; and e) program documentation and reporting. Satisfaction of the following minimum requirements is mandated and must be addressed in the program design: a. Vanpool incentives shall not exceed $400 per vanpool per month; and 523 Attachment 1 Statement of Work — continued Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number MS18024 b. Incentives shall flow to the participating commuter(s) by reducing the monthly cost to ride in the vanpool. Incentives may be passed through one or more intermediate recipients, including CalVans and Enterprise Rideshare. CONTRACTOR shall submit program design to MSRC for review. Task II: Conduct Outreach Consistent with the program design, CONTRACTOR shall conduct outreach activities. CONTRACTOR shall implement all components of the marketing plan. Task III: Implementation and Administration During this task, CONTRACTOR shall enroll eligible vanpools. CONTRACTOR shall also administer VanClub by paying claims, maintaining participation agreements, responding to inquiries, and maintaining records of all transactions. Outreach activities shall also continue during this task. CONTRACTOR shall ensure that only eligible participating commuters receive incentives according to the program design and policies and procedures created in Task I. Task IV: Monitoring, Documentation, and Reporting Quarterly Reports: Prior to program implementation (Task III), CONTRACTOR shall report on the progress made toward program implementation. Once program implementation has commenced, CONTRACTOR shall provide an accounting of enrolled vanpools and new enrollment to existing vanpools, and achievement of milestones; current activity, preliminary findings and recommendations for completion of contract; any project delays or problems and solutions; and summary and analysis of project results to date. Progress Reports that do not comply will be returned to the CONTRACTOR as inadequate. Final Report: Prior to the completion of the program, CONTRACTOR shall prepare a final report, in the format provided by SCAQMD staff, that summarizes actions taken to develop the program, identifies any obstacles and their solutions, discusses the successes of various marketing and administrative techniques or procedures, and quantifies the overall emission reduction benefits of the project. Project Schedule CONTRACTOR shall comply with the increments of progress identified in the following chart. The completion month for each task is based on the date of Contract execution. Task Completion Task I: Planning and Design Month 3 Task II: Conduct Outreach Month 33 Task III: Implementation and Administration Month 35 Task IV: Monitoring and Reporting Month 36 OA 524 Attachment 2 Cost Schedule Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number MS18024 Cost Breakdown CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed quarterly for Vanpool subsidies on an actual cost basis, as listed below, until all funds are exhausted. Maximum VanClub Regional AB 2766 Vanpool Program Cost Discretionary CONTRACTOR Total Project Element Funds payable Co -Funding Cost under this Contract Task 1— Planning and $0 $539,729 $539,729 Design Task 2 - Conduct $0 $190,000 $190,000 Outreach Task 3 — Implementation and $1,500,000 $1,009,890 $2,509,890 Administration Task 4 — Monitoring and $0 $6,000 $6,000 Reporting Totals $1,500,000 $1,745,619 $3,245,619 CONTRACTOR's co -funding contributions are estimates only, and are not required to be documented. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed according to the amounts stated above upon submission of invoices which document subsidies provided to Vanpool participants. 3 525 Attachment 3 Supporting Documentation Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number MS18024 1. Map of the VanClub Service Area 1URUPA VALLEY " L ASTVALE I 1. RIVERSIDE _ L NORCO h MORENO VALLEY A'+ _ A CANYb MENIEEE KE USINORE j WILDOMAR ��� 14wgs �N M 4 � IR'fJ� w�. .w. N >m ,TEMECUI t �J iAUM[3A 1E#LAN�if " a County of Riverside 4 526 ATTACHMENT 2a' Clean Transportation Funding from the MSRC Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee www.CIeanTransportationFunding.org May 3, 2018 Brian Cunanan MAY 0 ti 2018 i RANSPORTA IOCOUNTY COMMISSION Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission PO Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Dear Mr. Cunanan: 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 909.396.3269 Enclosed please find two copies of Contract No. MS18023 for signature by RCTC. Please have the appropriate signatory sign the signature page provided in each, and return both copies to: Matthew Mackenzie MSRC/AB2766 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 If we do not receive the signed contract within 12 months from the date of this letter, we reserve the right to terminate negotiations. If negotiations are terminated, the amounts previously awarded will revert to the AB 2766 Discretionary Fund. After the contract has been executed by this agency, I will return one copy for your files. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this contract. Sincerely, Matthew Mackenzie MSRC Contracts Administration (909) 396-2164 End MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS: California Air Resources Board - Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority - Orange County Transportation Authority - Riverside County Transportation Commission - San Bernardino Couty Transportation Authority - South Coast Air Quality Management District - Southern California AssocOr of Governments - Regional Ridesharing Agency South Coast Clean Contract No. MS18023 Transportation Air Quality Management District Funding 0 , ' SRC AB 27661MSRC COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM CONTRACT 1, PARTIES The parties to this contract ("Contract") are the South Coast Air Quality Management District (referred to here as "SCAQMD") whose address is 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765-4178, and Riverside County Transportation Commission (referred to here as "CONTRACTOR") whose address is 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, California 92502. RECITALS A. SCAQMD is the local agency with primary responsibility for regulating stationary source air pollution within the geographical boundaries of the South Coast Air Quality Management District in the State of California (State). SCAQMD is authorized under State Health & Safety Code Section 44225 (AB 2766) to levy a fee on motor vehicles for the purpose of reducing air pollution from such vehicles and to implement the California Clean Air Act. B. Under AB 2766, SCAQMD's Governing Board has authorized the imposition of the statutorily set motor vehicle fee. By taking such action, the State's Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) is required to collect such fee and remit it periodically to SCAQMD. C. AB 2766 further mandates that thirty (30) percent of such vehicle registration fees be placed by SCAQMD into a separate account for the sole purpose of implementing and monitoring programs to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles. D. AB 2766 creates a regional Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) to develop a work program to fund projects from the separate account. Pursuant to approval of the work program by SCAQMD's Governing Board, SCAQMD authorized this Contract with CONTRACTOR for equipment or services described in Attachment 1 - Statement of Work, expressly incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof of this Contract. E. CONTRACTOR has met the requirements for receipt of AB 2766 Discretionary Funds as set forth in CONTRACTOR's County Transportation Commission Partnership Program Application/Proposal dated December 2017. F. CONTRACTOR is authorized to do business in the State of California and attests that it is in good tax standing with the California Franchise Tax Board. G. All parties to this Contract have had the opportunity to have this Contract reviewed by their attorney. 3. DMV FEES CONTRACTOR acknowledges that SCAQMD cannot guarantee that the amount of fees to be collected under AB 2766 will be sufficient to fund this Contract. CONTRACTOR further acknowledges that payment under this Contract is contingent upon SCAQMD receiving sufficient funds from the DMV, and that SCAQMD assumes no responsibility for the collection and remittance of motor vehicle registration fees. 4, AUDIT AND RECORDS RETENTION A. CONTRACTOR shall, at least once every two years, or within two years of the termination of the Contract if the term is less than two years, be subject to an audit by SCAQMD or its authorized representative to determine if the revenues received by CONTRACTOR were spent for the reduction of pollution from motor vehicles pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1988. 1 528 Contract No. MS18023 B. CONTRACTOR agrees to maintain records related to this Contract during the Contract term and continue to retain these records for a period of two years beyond the Contract term, except that in no case shall CONTRACTOR be required to retain more than the most recent five years' records. SCAQMD shall coordinate such audit through CONTRACTOR'S audit staff. C. If an amount is found to be inappropriately expended, SCAQMD may withhold funding, or seek reimbursement, from CONTRACTOR in the amount equal to the amount that was inappropriately expended. Such withholding shall not be construed as SCAQMD's sole remedy and shall not relieve CONTRACTOR of its obligation to perform under the terms of this Contract. 5. TERM The term of this Contract is for thirty six (36) months from the date of execution by both parties, unless terminated earlier as provided for in the TERMINATION clause of this Contract, or the term is extended by amendment of this Contract in writing, No work shall commence prior to the Contract start date, except at CONTRACTOR's cost and risk, and no charges are authorized until this Contract is fully executed, subject to the provisions stated in the PRE -CONTRACT COSTS clause of this Contract. 6. SUCCESSORS -IN -INTEREST This Contract, and the obligations arising under the Contract, shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of CONTRACTOR and their executors, administrators, successors, and assigns. 7. REPORTING CONTRACTOR shall submit reports to SCAQMD as outlined in Attachment 1 - Statement of Work. SCAQMD reserves the right to review, comment, and request changes to any report produced as a result of this Contract. 8. TERMINATION A. In the event any party fails to comply with any term or condition of this Contract, or fails to provide services in the manner agreed upon by the parties, including, but not limited to, the requirements of Attachment 1 - Statement of Work, this failure shall constitute a breach of this Contract. The non - breaching party shall notify the breaching party that it must cure this breach or provide written notification of its intention to terminate this contract. Notification shall be provided in the manner set forth in the NOTICES clause of this Contract. The non -breaching party reserves all rights under law and equity to enforce this Contract and recover damages. B. SCAQMD reserves the right to terminate this Contract, in whole or in part, without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice. Once such notice has been given, CONTRACTOR shall, except as and to the extent or directed otherwise by SCAQMD, discontinue any Work being performed under this Contract and cancel any of CONTRACTOR's orders for materials, facilities, and supplies in connection with such Work, and shall use its best efforts to procure termination of existing subcontracts upon terms satisfactory to SCAQMD, Thereafter, CONTRACTOR shall perform only such services as may be necessary to preserve and protect any Work already in progress and to dispose of any property as requested by SCAQMD. C. CONTRACTOR shall be paid in accordance with this Contract for all Work performed before the effective date of termination under section B of the TERMINATION clause of this Contract. Before expiration of the thirty (30) days' written notice, CONTRACTOR shall promptly deliver to SCAQMD all copies of documents and other information and data prepared or developed by CONTRACTOR under this Contract with the exception of a record copy of such materials, which may be retained by CONTRACTOR. 2 529 Contract No. MS18023 9. STOP WORK SCAQMD may, at any time, by written notice to CONTRACTOR, require CONTRACTOR to stop all or any part of the Statement of Work tasks in this Contract, A stop work order may be issued for reasons including, but not limited to, the project exceeding the budget, out of scope work, delay in project schedule, or misrepresentations. Upon receipt of the stop work order, CONTRACTOR shall immediately take all necessary steps to comply with the order. CONTRACTOR shall resume the work only upon receipt of written instructions from SCAQMD cancelling the stop work order. CONTRACTOR agrees and understands that CONTRACTOR will not be paid for performing work while the stop work order is in effect, unless SCAQMD agrees to do so in its written cancellation of the stop work order, 10. INSURANCE A. CONTRACTOR shall furnish evidence to SCAQMD of workers' compensation insurance for each of its employees, in accordance with either California or other states' applicable statutory requirements prior to commencement of any work on this Contract. B. CONTRACTOR shall furnish evidence to SCAQMD of general liability insurance with a limit of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence, and $2,000,000 in a general aggregate prior to commencement of any work on this Contract. SCAQMD shall be named as an additional insured on any such liability policy, and thirty (30) days written notice prior to cancellation of any such insurance shall be given by CONTRACTOR to SCAQMD, C. CONTRACTOR shall furnish evidence to SCAQMD of automobile liability insurance with limits of at least $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident for bodily injuries, and $50,000 in property damage, or $1,000,000 combined single limit for bodily injury or property damage, prior to commencement of any work on this Contract. SCAQMD shall be named as an additional insured on any such liability policy, and thirty (30) days written notice prior to cancellation of any such insurance shall be given by CONTRACTOR to SCAQMD. D. If CONTRACTOR fails to maintain the required insurance coverage set forth above, SCAQMD reserves the right either to purchase such additional insurance and to deduct the cost thereof from any payments owed to CONTRACTOR or terminate this Contract for breach. E. All insurance certificates shall be mailed to: SCAQMD, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765- 4178, Attention: Cynthia Ravenstein, MSRC Contracts Administrator, The SCAQMD Contract Number must be included on the face of the certificate. F. CONTRACTOR must provide updates on the insurance coverage throughout the term of the Contract to ensure that there is no break in coverage during the period of contract performance. Failure to provide evidence of current coverage shall be grounds for termination for breach of Contract. 11. INDEMNIFICATION CONTRACTOR agrees to hold harmless, defend and indemnify SCAQMD, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, and successors -in -interest against any and all loss, damage, costs, lawsuits, claims, demands, causes of action, judgments, attorney's fees, or any other expenses arising from or related to any third party claim against SCAQMD, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, or successors in interest that arise or result in whole or in part, from any actual or alleged act or omission of CONTRACTOR, its employees, subcontractors, agents or representatives in the performance of this Contract. This Indemnification Clause shall survive the expiration or termination (for any reason) of the Contract and shall remain in full force and effect. 3 530 Contract No. MS18023 12, PAYMENT A. SCAQMD shall reimburse CONTRACTOR up to a total amount of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) in accordance with Attachment 2 - Cost Schedule expressly incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof of the Contract. B. A withhold amount or percentage (if any) shall be identified in the Cost Schedule, and such amount shall be withheld from each invoice. Upon satisfactory completion of project and final acceptance of work and the final report, CONTRACTOR's invoice for the withheld amount shall be released, Proof of project completion shall include a Final Report detailing the project goals and accomplishments, data collected during project performance, if any, documentation of significant results, and emissions reduction input data needed for calculation of emissions reductions. C. Any funds not expended upon early Contract termination or Contract completion shall revert to the AB 2766 Discretionary Fund, Payment of charges shall be made by SCAQMD to CONTRACTOR within thirty (30) days after approval by SCAQMD of an itemized invoice prepared and furnished by CONTRACTOR. D. An invoice submitted to SCAQMD for payment must be prepared in duplicate, on company letterhead, and list SCAQMD's contract number, period covered by invoice, and CONTRACTOR's social security number or Employer Identification Number and submitted to: South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 Attn: Cynthia Ravenstein, MSRC Contracts Administrator 1. Charges for equipment, material, and supply costs, travel expenses, subcontractors, and other charges, as applicable, must be itemized by CONTRACTOR. Reimbursement for equipment, material, supplies, subcontractors, and other charges, as applicable, shall be made at actual cost. Supporting documentation must be provided for all individual charges (with the exception of direct labor charges provided by CONTRACTOR). 2. SCAQMD shall pay CONTRACTOR for travel -related expenses only if such travel is expressly set forth in Attachment 2 - Cost Schedule of this Contract or pre -authorized by SCAQMD in writing. 3. CONTRACTOR's failure to provide receipts shall be grounds for SCAQMD's non -reimbursement of such charges. CONTRACTOR may reduce payments on invoices by those charges for which receipts were not provided. 4. CONTRACTOR must submit final invoice no later than ninety (90) days after the termination date of this Contract or invoice may not be paid. 13, COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS CONTRACTOR agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations and orders of public authorities in the performance of this Contract. CONTRACTOR must also ensure that the vehicles and/or equipment to be purchased, leased or installed in the performance of this Contract are in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local air quality rules and regulations, and that it will maintain compliance for the full Contract term. CONTRACTOR shall ensure that the provisions of this clause are included in all subcontracts. 14. MOBILE SOURCE EMISSION REDUCTION CREDITS (MSERCs) A. The MSRC has adopted a policy that no MSERCs resulting from AB 2766 Discretionary Funds may be generated and/or sold. 4 531 Contract No. MS18023 B. CONTRACTOR has the opportunity to generate MSERCs as a by-product of the project if a portion of the air quality benefits attributable to the project resulted from funding sources other than AB2766. These MSERCs, which are issued by SCAQMD, are based upon the quantified vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by project vehicles or other activity data as appropriate. Therefore, a portion of prospective MSERCs, generated as a result of AB 2766 Funds, must be retired, The portion of prospective credits funded by the AB 2766 program, and which are subject to retirement, shall be referred to as "AB 2766- MSERCs." C. The determination of AB 2766-MSERC's is to be prorated based upon the AB 2766 program's contribution to the cost associated with the air quality benefits. In the case where AB 2766 Discretionary Funds are used to pay for the full differential cost of a new alternative fuel vehicle or for the retrofitting or repowering of an existing vehicle, all MSERCs attributable to AB 2766 Discretionary Funds must be retired. The determination of AB 2766-MSERCs for infrastructure and other ancillary items is to be prorated based upon the AB 2766 program's contribution to the associated air quality benefits, Determination of the project's overall cost will be on a case -by -case basis at the time an MSERC application is submitted. SCAQMD staff, at the time an MSERC application is submitted, will calculate total MSERCs and retire the AB 2766-MSERCs, CONTRACTOR would then receive the balance of the MSERCs not associated with AB 2766 funding. 15. NOTICES All notices that are required under this Contract shall be provided in the manner set forth herein, unless specified otherwise. Notice to a party shall be delivered to the attention of the person listed below, or to such other person or persons as may hereafter be designated by that party in writing. Notice shall be in writing sent by email, U.S. Mail, express, certified, return receipt requested, or a nationally recognized overnight courier service. In the case of email communications, valid notice shall be deemed to have been delivered upon sending, provided the sender obtained an electronic confirmation of delivery, Email communications shall be deemed to have been received on the date of such transmission, provided such date was a business day (Tuesday -Friday) and delivered prior to 5:30pm Pacific Standard Time. Otherwise, receipt of email communications shall be deemed to have occurred on the following business day. In the case of U.S. Mail notice, notice shall be deemed to be received when delivered or five (5) business days after deposit in the U. S. Mail. In the case of a nationally recognized overnight courier service, notice shall be deemed received when delivered (written receipt of delivery), SCAQMD: South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 Attn: Cynthia Ravenstein, MSRC Contracts Administrator, email: cravenstein@agmd.gov CONTRACTOR: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon St, Riverside, CA 92502 Attn: Brian Cunanan, email: BCurianan rctc.or 16. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR is an independent contractor. CONTRACTOR, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, or subcontractors shall in no sense be considered employees or agents of SCAQMD, nor shall CONTRACTOR, its officers, employees, agents, representatives, or subcontractors be entitled to or 5 532 Contract No. MS18023 eligible to participate in any benefits, privileges, or plans, given or extended by SCAQMD to its employees. SCAQMD will not supervise, direct, or have control over, or be responsible for, CONTRACTOR's or subcontractor's means, methods, techniques, work sequences or procedures, or for the safety precautions and programs incident thereto, or for any failure by them to comply with any local, state, or federal laws, or rules or regulations, including state minimum wage laws and OSHA requirements. 17. SUBCONTRACTOR APPROVAL If CONTRACTOR intends to subcontract all or a portion of the work under this Contract, then CONTRACTOR must first obtain written approval from SCAQMD's Executive Officer or designee prior to subcontracting any work, Such prior approval applies only to subcontractors not already included in Attachment 1, Statement of Work. Any material changes to the subcontract(s) that affect the scope of work, deliverable schedule, and/or payment/cost schedule shall also require the prior written approval of the Executive Officer or designee. No subcontract charges will be reimbursed unless the required approvals have been obtained from SCAQMD, 18. OWNERSHIP Title and full ownership rights to any equipment purchased under this Contract shall at all times remain with CONTRACTOR. 19. NON-DISCRIMINATION In the performance of this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall not unlawfully discriminate, harass or allow harassment, against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, age, mental status, medical condition, physical or mental disability, denial of family and medical care leave, denial of pregnancy disability leave, or reasonable accommodations. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of the California Fair Employment & Housing Act (Government Code Section 12900 et seq.), the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) and all amendments thereto, Executive Order No. 11246 (30 Federal Register 12319), and all administrative rules and regulations issued pursuant to said Acts and Order. 20. CITIZENSHIP AND ALIEN STATUS A. CONTRACTOR warrants that it fully complies with all laws regarding the employment of aliens and others, and that its employees performing services hereunder meet the citizenship or alien status requirements contained in federal and state statutes and regulations including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-603). CONTRACTOR shall obtain from all covered employees performing services hereunder all verification and other documentation of employees' eligibility status required by federal statutes and regulations as they currently exist and as they may be hereafter amended. CONTRACTOR shall have a continuing obligation to verify and document the continuing employment authorization and authorized alien status of employees performing services under this Contract to insure continued compliance with all federal statutes and regulations. Notwithstanding the above, CONTRACTOR, in the performance of this Contract, shall not discriminate against any person in violation of 8 USC Section 1324b. B. CONTRACTOR shall retain such documentation for all covered employees for the period described by law. CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless SCAQMD, its officers and employees from employer sanctions and other liability which may be assessed against CONTRACTOR or SCAQMD, or both in connection with any alleged violation of federal statutes or regulations pertaining to the eligibility for employment of persons performing services under this Contract. 6 533 Contract No. MS18023 21. NON -EFFECT OF WAIVER The failure of CONTRACTOR or SCAQMD to insist upon the performance of any or all of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this Contract, or failure'to exercise any rights or remedies hereunder, shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of the future performance of any such terms, covenants, or conditions, or of the future exercise of such rights or remedies, unless otherwise provided for herein. 22. TAX IMPLICATIONS FROM RECEIPT OF MSRC FUNDS CONTRACTOR is advised to consult a tax attorney regarding potential tax implications from receipt of MSRC funds. 23. ATTORNEYS' FEES In the event any action is filed in connection with the enforcement or interpretation of this Contract, each party in said action shall pay its own attorneys' fees and costs. 24, FORCE MAJEURE A party shall not be liable or deemed to be in default for any delay or failure in performance under this Contract or interruption of services resulting, directly or indirectly, from acts of God, civil or military authority, acts of public enemy, war, strikes, labor disputes, shortages of suitable parts, materials, labor or transportation, or any similar cause beyond the party's reasonable control.. 25. SEVERABILITY In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained in this Contract shall for any reason be held to be unenforceable in any respect by a court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect any other provisions of this Contract, and the Contract shall then be construed as if such unenforceable provisions are not a part hereof. 26. HEADINGS Headings on the clauses of this Contract are for convenience and reference only, and the words contained therein shall in no way be held to explain, modify, amplify, or aid in the interpretation, construction, or meaning of the provisions of this Contract. 27. DUPLICATE EXECUTION This Contract is executed in duplicate. Each signed copy shall have the force and effect of an original. 28. GOVERNING LAW This Contract shall be construed and interpreted and the legal relations created thereby shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of California, Venue for resolution of any disputes under this Contract shall be Los Angeles County, California. 29. PRE -CONTRACT COSTS Any costs incurred by CONTRACTOR prior to CONTRACTOR receipt of a fully executed Contract shall be incurred solely at the risk of the CONTRACTOR. In the event that this Contract is not executed, neither the MSRC nor the SCAQMD shall be liable for any amounts expended in anticipation of a fully executed Contract. If this Contract is fully executed, pre -contract cost expenditures authorized by the Contract will be reimbursed in accordance with the Cost Schedule and payment provision of the Contract. 7 534 Contract No. MS18023 30. CHANGE TERMS Changes to any part of this Contract must be requested in writing by CONTRACTOR and approved by MSRC in accordance with MSRC policies and procedures. CONTRACTOR must make requests a minimum of 90 days prior to desired effective date of change. All modifications to this Contract shall be in writing and signed by the authorized representatives of the parties, Fueling station location changes shall not be approved under any circumstances. 31. ENTIRE CONTRACT This Contract represents the entire agreement between CONTRACTOR and SCAQMD. There are no understandings, representations, or warranties of any kind except as expressly set forth herein. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions herein shall be binding on any party unless in writing and signed by the authorized representative of the party against whom enforcement of such waiver, alteration, or modification is sought. 32. AUTHORITY The signator hereto represents and warrants that he or she is authorized and empowered and has the legal capacity to execute this Contract and to legally bind CONTRACTOR both in an operational and financial capacity and that the requirements and obliqations under this Contract are leq_ally enforceable and binding_ on CONTRACTOR. (THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) 8 535 Contract No. MS18023 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Contract have caused this Contract to be duly executed on their behalf by their authorized representatives. SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Dr. William A. Burke, Chairman, Governing Board Date: ATTEST: Denise Garzaro, Clerk of the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: Bayron T. Gilchrist, General Counsel //MSRC Master Boilerplate Revised April 24, 2018 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: _ Name: Title: Date: 536 537 Attachment 1 Statement of Work Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number MS18023 Project Description Freeway Service Patrols (FSP) are designed to relieve non -recurring congestion on freeways through the quick detection, verification, and removal of accidents and other freeway incidents. With ever increasing population, and regional events and destinations that require travel through and within Riverside County, significant traffic volumes are no longer reserved to weekday commutes. In addition to the regular FSP service already provided in the project areas Monday through Friday during peak commute hours, CONTRACTOR proposes to implement FSP during additional hours. Using funds provided by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), on behalf of the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC), CONTRACTOR shall implement weekend FSP for two very congested highway segments as described below. Statement of Work 1. Development and Preparation — CONTRACTOR shall develop a weekend FSP program as described below, including but not limited to securing Tow Service Operator(s). a. Minimum Days and Hours of Operation: The project shall start with a base schedule of 10 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. A minimum of two FSP vehicles shall be in operation during service hours. CONTRACTOR shall evaluate the service hours after the first six months and assess if any adjustments are needed, but in no case shall service hours be less than six hours per day. b. Locations — As shown in Attachment 3.1 — Service Area Locations and further described as follows: L "Beat 4" on State Route (SR) 91 from Magnolia Avenue to the SR 91/SR 60/Interstate 215 interchange; and ii. "Beat 8" on SR 60 and Interstate 215, from Central Avenue on the SR-60/Interstate 215 to Alessandro Boulevard on the Interstate 215 and on the SR-60 from the SR- 60/Interstate 215 split in Moreno Valley to Theodore Street. c. Services — Quick detection, verification, and removal of accidents and other freeway incidents. 2. Service Operation - CONTRACTOR shall ensure that services are provided as described in Task 1 above. 3. Promotion - CONTRACTOR shall prepare and submit a proposed Public Outreach Plan to promote the MSRC's co -funding of the weekend FSP service. Acceptable outreach may include, but is not limited to, notices in CONTRACTOR mailings to residents, newspaper notices, flyers, and information items at CONTRACTOR Board meetings and community events. The Public Outreach Plan shall automatically be deemed approved 30 days following receipt by SCAQMD staff, unless SCAQMD staff notify CONTRACTOR in writing of a Public 1 538 Attachment 1 Statement of Work — continued Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number MS18023 Outreach Plan deficiency. CONTRACTOR shall implement the approved Public Outreach Plan in accordance with the Project Schedule below. 4. Program Monitoring and Reporting a. Quarterly Reports: Until work is complete, CONTRACTOR shall provide quarterly progress reports that summarize the project results including, but not limited to: • Centerline miles for each beat implemented during reporting period; • Average number of tow trucks deployed for each beat; • Total number of service hours per beat for the reporting period; • Total number of motorist assists per beat for the reporting period; and • Average number of motorist assists per truck -hour per beat for the reporting period. Progress reports that do not comply will be returned to the CONTRACTOR as inadequate. b. Final Report: A Final Report shall be submitted by the CONTRACTOR in the format provided by SCAQMD staff. Report shall include, at a minimum: a) an executive summary; and b) a detailed discussion of the results and conclusions of this project. CONTRACTOR will identify any barriers encountered and solutions developed to overcome the barriers, and impact of project on future FSP projects. 5. Project Schedule - CONTRACTOR shall comply with the increments of progress identified in the following chart. The completion month for each task is based on the date of Contract execution. Task Completion Task 1— Development and Preparation Month 3 Task 2 — Service Operation Month 33 Task 3 — Promotion Month 35 Task 4 — Monitoring and Reporting Month 36 N 539 Attachment 2 Cost Schedule Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number MS18023 Cost Breakdown CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed quarterly for Operation of the Service on an actual cost basis, as listed below, until all funds are exhausted. Total reimbursement per quarter shall not exceed $65,000. Maximum AB 2766 Construction FSP Cost Discretionary CONTRACTOR Total Project Element Funds payable Co -Funding Cost under this Contract Task 1— Development $0 $3,700 $3,700 and Preparation Task 2 - Service $500,000 $133,000 $633,000 Operation Task 3 — Promotion $0 $1,000 $1,000 Task 4 — Monitoring and $0 $500 $500 Reporting Totals $500,000 $138,200 $638,200 CONTRACTOR's in -kind labor contributions for Tasks 1, 3 and 4 are estimates only, and are not required to be documented provided that other co -funding sources are equal to or greater than the MSRC funding amount. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed according to the amounts stated above upon submission of invoices which shall include a copy of service provider(s) invoice(s) detailing dates of service and total hours of services. CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed solely for the operating cost of providing weekend FSP service. 540 Attachment 3 Supporting Documentation Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number MS18023 1. Service Area Locations 541 Attachment 3 Supporting Documentation Riverside County Transportation Commission Contract Number MS18023 1. Service Area Locations Ontario v�ay Eastyale ; Beat 4 Norco o �'a favt►a 99y4� psi0 Lake c� F Matthe-ls PQ -COI 1 5 Indian Truck Trail 7 SAN BERNARDINO CO. RIVERSIDE CO. calimesa Beat 8 Moreno Valley March ARB San �2{In[4 ElhilslC�id `rye Banning Beaumont 5 542 543 AGENDA ITEM 8T RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendments to Freeway Service Patrol Agreements STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 14-45-009-08, Amendment No. 6 to Agreement No. 14-45-009-00, with Steve's Towing (Steve's) to provide Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) services on Beat Nos. 1 and 2 and State Route 91 Extended Services on Beat Nos. 1 and 2 through September 3, 2018, for an additional amount of $214,000, and a total amount not to exceed $3,498,057; 2) Approve Agreement No. 16-45-082-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 16-45-082-00, with Pepe's Towing (Pepe's) to provide FSP services on Beat No. 4 for an additional amount of $253,000, and a total amount not to exceed $1,051,000; 3) Approve Agreement No. 16-45-044-01, Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 16-45-044-00, with Pepe's to provide FSP services on Beat No. 8 for an additional amount of $247,000, and a total amount not to exceed $1,022,000; and 4) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission, acting in its capacity as the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE), is the principal agency in Riverside County, in partnership with Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol (CHP), managing the FSP program. The purpose of the FSP program is to provide a continuously roving tow services patrol along designated freeway segments (referred to as beats) to relieve freeway congestion and facilitate the rapid removal of disabled vehicles and those involved in minor accidents on local freeways. Currently, the Commission contracts with three tow truck operators to provide service on a total of nine beats Monday through Friday during the peak commute hours, 5:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. (12:30 p.m. on Fridays) to 6:30 p.m. In addition to regular FSP service, incremental weekend FSP service funded by a Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) grant, is provided along State Route 91 in Corona. Several FSP contracts are in need of amendments to add funds and/or extend terms to maintain and or expand service levels on select beats. Agenda Item 8T 544 Beats 1 and 2 During a prior FSP procurement cycle for four beats, including two beats along SR-91 in Corona (see Beats 1 and 2 in Figure 1), a single contractor bid and was recommended for award of all beats. The contractor subsequently declined Beats 1 and 2, and a new procurement was initiated for these beats. At the May meeting, the Commission awarded these beats to a new contractor; however, the anticipated start date for Beats 1 and 2 is delayed to early September 2018 due to the additional procurement cycle. The current contract term for Beats 1 and 2, operated by Steve's, expires on June 30, 2018. An extension to Steve's agreement is needed to provide for continued service of Beats 1 and 2 until the transition to the new operator and backup weekend service operator service as needed through March 2019. The services for the extended period also require an increase in the agreement authorization for an additional amount of $214,000, and a new total amount not to exceed $3,498,057. SAN BERNARDINO CO. Jurupa Valley RIVERSIDE CO. �� � BaStVaie Beat 4 Beat SAdd Weekend Service 15 �-J , Add Weekend Service ® Norco Riversid Moreno CD Bea s 7 &2 Valley o Extend rvice & Ter C„ _ March ARB ake 0 til Corona ® erns y .p Perris 'y� d'i0 Lake 8` F Matthews CIO O � Indian Truck Trail Figure 1: FSP Beats 1&2, 4, and 8 Rant-, A anri R Ethanac Rd lie The Commission received an allocation of $500,000 from the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee to provide new weekend FSP service on Beat 4 (Riverside) along SR-91 from Magnolia Avenue to the 60/91/215 interchange and on Beat 8 (Riverside/Moreno Valley) along SR-60 from Central Avenue to Interstate 215 at Alessandro Boulevard to SR-60 at Theodore Street. These beats are shown in Figure 1. Additional funds need to be added to two agreements with Pepe's, the current operator for both beats, to provide additional service on Agenda Item 8T 545 weekends. The Pepe's agreements for Beat 4 and Beat 8 will require an increase in the agreement authorization for additional amounts of $253,000 and $247,000, respectively to fulfill the scope of the MSRC project. Staff recommends approval of the three FSP amendments as outlined in the staff recommendation above. Hourly rates for the FSP services in the aforementioned contracts will remain unchanged. Financial Information Yes FY 2017/18 $30,000 In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2018/19 Amount: $324,000 N/A FY 2019/20+ $360,000 State of California, SAFE funds, and No Source of Funds: Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Budget Adjustment: No Review Committee funds N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 002173 81014 00000 0000 20145 81002 Fiscal Procedures Approved: \)"� Date: 05/25/2018 Attachments: 1) Draft Steve's Agreement No. 14-45-009-08 2) Draft Pepe's Agreement No. 16-45-082-01 3) Draft Pepe's Agreement No. 16-45-044-01 Agenda Item 8T 546 ATTACHMENT 1 Agreement No. 14-45-009-08 AMENDMENT NO. 6 TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, ACTING AS THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL SERVICES FOR THE SR-91 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CONSTRUCTION (91 CIP BEAT No. 1 and No. 2) AND FOR FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL SERVICES FOR BEAT No. 1 (FORMERLY BEAT No. 25) WITH E&S TOWING ENTERPRISES, INC. dba STEVE'S TOWING 1 . PARTIES AND DATE. 1.1 This Amendment No. 6 to the Amended and Restated Agreement for Construction Freeway Service Patrol Services is made and entered into as of June 30, 2018, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("RCTC"), acting as the RIVERSIDE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES ("SAFE"), and E&S TOWING ENTERPRISES, INC. dba STEVE'S TOWING (referred to herein as "CONTRACTOR"). SAFE and CONTRACTOR are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties". 2. RECITALS. 2.1 WHEREAS, SAFE and the CONTRACTOR entered into those certain agreements for the provision of Construction Freeway Service Patrol Services for the State Route 91 ("SR-91") Corridor Improvement Project ("SR-91 Project"), identified as Agreement Nos. 14-45-009-00 and 14-45-028-00 (the "Contracts"). 2.2 WHEREAS, as of January 22, 2015, SAFE and CONTRACTOR entered into that certain Amended and Restated Agreement No. 14-45-009-01 to replace and supersede, in their entirety, the Contracts (the "Restated Agreement"). 2.3 WHEREAS, effective February 2, 2015, SAFE changed the beat specifications serviced by CONTRACTOR from Beat # 25 to Beat # 1 as set forth in Contract Change Order No. 1. 2.4 WHEREAS, SAFE and CONTRACTOR have entered into an Amendment No. 1 dated April 13, 2015 for the purpose of amending the Restated Agreement to include Beat # 7. 2.5 WHEREAS, as set forth in Contract Change Order No. 2, SAFE changed (a) the beat specifications serviced by CONTRACTOR from Beat # 7 to Beat # 2, effective as of August 1, 2015, (b) the construction hours serviced by 17336.0002A\30665716.3 547 CONTRACTOR, effective as of July 13, 2015, and (c) the beat limits serviced by CONTRACTOR, effective as of August 19, 2015. 2.6 WHEREAS, SAFE and CONTRACTOR have entered into an Amendment No. 2 dated February 18, 2016 for the purpose of amending the Restated Agreement in order to provide additional FSP services, on a temporary basis, as further described therein. 2.7 WHEREAS, SAFE and CONTRACTOR have entered into an Amendment No. 3 dated February 9, 2017 for the purpose of amending the Restated Agreement in order to provide additional compensation for the continued provision of FSP services beyond the original anticipated completion date of the SR-91 Project, and to amend the termination date of the Restated Agreement to provide for a new termination date of September 30, 2017. 2.8 WHEREAS, SAFE and CONTRACTOR have entered into an Amendment No. 4 dated July 31, 2017 for the purpose of amending the Restated Agreement in order to amend the termination date of the Restated Agreement to provide for a new termination date of November 5, 2017, provide additional compensation, and to amend the service schedule for the continued provision of freeway service patrol services. 2.9 WHEREAS, SAFE and CONTRACTOR have entered into an Amendment No. 5 dated October 11, 2017 for the purpose of amending the Restated Agreement in order to amend the termination date of the Restated Agreement to provide for a new termination date of June 30, 2018, to increase the hourly rate of compensation, to provide additional compensation for the continued provision of freeway service patrol services, and to revise certain hours of operation. 2.10 WHEREAS, SAFE and CONTRACTOR now desire to amend the Restated Agreement in order to amend the termination date of the Restated Agreement to provide for a new termination date of September 3, 2018 for Regular Service for Beat # 1 and Beat # 2 and for Beat 1 & 2 - 91 Extended Service; to include an option for as needed weekend service on Saturdays and Sundays for any Beat covered under the Restated Agreement ("As -Needed Weekend Service") through May 1, 2020; to provide additional compensation for the continued provision of freeway service patrol services; and to revise certain hours of FSP operation. 3. TERMS. 3.1 CONTRACTOR shall continue to provide the FSP services as required by SAFE in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Restated Agreement, as previously amended, and as amended by this Amendment No. 6. 17336.0002A\30665716.3 2 3.2 The term of the Restated Agreement, as set forth in Section 3.4 of the Restated Agreement, shall be amended to change the termination date from June 30, 2018 to May 1, 2020, subject to the following: (a) Regular Service for Beat #1 and Beat #2, and Beat 1 & 2 — 91 Extended Service shall terminate on September 3, 2018. (b) As -Needed Weekend Service shall be provided, upon written request by RCTC, through May 1, 2020. 3.3 The maximum compensation for Services, as that term is defined in the Restated Agreement, to be provided under this Amendment No. 6, including compensation for As -Needed Weekend Service, shall not exceed Three Hundred Ninety Thousand, Eight Hundred Eighty -Two Dollars and Sixty -Six Cents ($390,882.66) as follows: (a) One Hundred Sixty Thousand, Five Hundred Forty Six Dollars ($160,546.00) is allocated for Regular Service for Beat # 1 and Beat # 2 and for Beat 1 & 2 - 91 Extended Service through September 3, 2018; (b) Two Hundred Eleven Thousand, Seven Hundred Twenty Three Dollars and Twenty Cents ($211,723.20) is allocated for As -Needed Weekend Service through May 1, 2020; (c) Eighteen Thousand, Six Hundred Thirteen Dollars and Forty Six Cents ($18,613.46) may be allocated for any of the Services, as determined by RCTC. 3.4 The total not -to -exceed amount of the Restated Agreement, as amended by this Amendment No. 6, shall be increased from Three Million Two Hundred Eighty - Four Thousand Fifty -Six Dollars and Sixty Cents ($3,284,056.60) to Three Million Six Hundred Seventy -Four Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty -Nine Dollars and Twenty -Six Cents ($3,674,939.26). 3.5 The Beat Service Schedule and Hours of Operation, as set forth in Exhibit "A" of the Restated Agreement, shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: Beat 1 - Regular Service (2 Trucks) Mon Tue Wed Thurs Fri Sat Sun 5:30am- 5:30am- 5:30am- 5:30am- 5:30am- 8:30am 8:30am 8:30am 8:30am 8:30am 2:30pm- 2:30pm- 2:30pm- 2:30pm- 12:30pm- 6:30pm 6:30pm 6:30pm 6:30pm 8.0opm 17336.0002A\30665716.3 3 549 Beat 2 - Regular Service (2 Trucks) Mon Tue Wed Thurs Fri Sat Sun 5:30am- 5:30am- 5:30am- 5:30am- 5:30am- 8:30am 8:30am 8:30am 8:30am 8:30am 2:30pm- 2:30pm- 2:30pm- 2:30pm- 12:30pm- 6:30pm 6:30pm 6:30pm 6:30pm 8:00pm Beat 1 & 2 - 91 Extended Service (3 Trucks) Mon Tue Wed Thurs Fri Sat Sun 8am - 9am - 6pm 7pm 3.6 Notwithstanding any terms or conditions in the Restated Agreement to the contrary, Services provided under this Amendment No. 6 by CONTRACTOR shall be performed and provided pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of the Restated Agreement, as previously amended and as amended by this Amendment No. 6. 3.7 Except as amended by this Amendment No. 6, all provisions of the Restated Agreement, as previously amended, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the Parties under this Amendment No. 6. 3.8 This Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 3.9 This Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. [Signatures on following page] 17336.0002A\30665716.3 4 550 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT 14-45-009-08 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 6 (AGREEMENT 14-45-009-08) as of the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ACTING AS THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES IN Anne Mayer, Executive Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: IN Best Best & Krieger LLP, Counsel to the Riverside County Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies * A corporation requires the signatures of two corporate officers. E&S TOWING ENTERPRISES, INC., dba STEVE'S TOWING By: Signature Name Title Attest: By: Its: One signature shall be that of the chairman of board, the president or any vice president and the second signature (on the attest line) shall be that of the secretary, any assistant secretary, the chief financial officer or any assistant treasurer of such corporation. If the above persons are not the intended signators, evidence of signature authority shall be provided to RCTC. 551 17336.0002A\30665716.3 5 ATTACHMENT 2 Agreement No. 16-45-082-01 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL SERVICES FOR BEAT NO. 4 WITH PEPE'S TOWING SERVICE 1. PARTIES AND DATE This Amendment No. 1 is made and entered into as of this day of , 2018, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("Commission") acting in its capacity as the RIVERSIDE SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES ("SAFE'), a public entity, and PEPE'S, INC., a California corporation doing business as Pepe's Towing Services ("Contractor"). 2. RECITALS 2.1 SAFE and the Contractor have entered into an agreement dated October 21, 2016 for the provision of freeway service patrol services for Beat # 4 within Riverside County on behalf of SAFE (the "Master Agreement"). 2.2 SAFE and the Contractor now desire to amend the Master Agreement in order to include an option for as needed weekend service on Saturdays and Sundays for Beat # 4 ("As -Needed Weekend Service"), and to provide additional compensation for such freeway service patrol services. 3. TERMS 3.1 The Services, as that term is defined in the Master Agreement, shall be amended to include the option for As -Needed Weekend Service. As - Needed Weekend Service shall be provided upon written request by RCTC. 3.2 As -Needed Weekend Service shall be provided at the rates and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Master Agreement. 3.3 The maximum compensation to be provided under this Amendment No. 1 for As -Needed Weekend Service shall not exceed Two Hundred Fifty Three Thousand Dollars ($253,000). The foregoing sum covers thirty-six (36) months of As -Needed Weekend Service. 3.4 The total not -to -exceed amount of the Master Agreement, as amended by this Amendment No. 1, shall be increased from Seven Hundred Ninety 17336.0002A\31164805.1 552 Eight Thousand Dollars ($798,000) to One Million Fifty One Thousand Dollars ($1,051,000). 3.4 Except as amended by this Amendment No. 1, all provisions of the Master Agreement, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment No. 1 3.5 This Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 3.6 This Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. [Signatures on following page] 17336.0002A\31164805.1 2 553 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT NO. 16-45-082-01 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES IN Anne Mayer, Executive Director Approved as to Form: Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel PEPE'S INC., a California corporation d/b/a PEPE'S TOWING SERVICE By: Signature Name Title Attest: By: Its: Secretary * A corporation requires the signatures of two corporate officers. One signature shall be that of the chairman of board, the president or any vice president and the second signature (on the attest line) shall be that of the secretary, any assistant secretary, the chief financial officer or any assistant treasurer of such corporation. If the above persons are not the intended signators, evidence of signature authority shall be provided to the Commission. 3 17336.0002A\31164805.1 554 ATTACHMENT 3 Agreement No. 16-45-044-01 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL SERVICES FOR BEAT NO. 8 WITH PEPE'S TOWING SERVICE 1. PARTIES AND DATE This Amendment No. 1 is made and entered into as of this day of , 2018, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("Commission") acting in its capacity as the RIVERSIDE SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES ("SAFE'), a public entity, and PEPE'S, INC., a California corporation doing business as Pepe's Towing Services ("Contractor"). 2. RECITALS 2.1 SAFE and the Contractor have entered into an agreement dated April 6, 2016 for the provision of freeway service patrol services for Beat # 8 within Riverside County on behalf of SAFE (the "Master Agreement"). 2.2 SAFE and the Contractor now desire to amend the Master Agreement in order to include an option for as needed weekend service on Saturdays and Sundays for Beat # 8 ("As -Needed Weekend Service"), and to provide additional compensation for such freeway service patrol services. 3. TERMS 3.1 The Services, as that term is defined in the Master Agreement, shall be amended to include the option for As -Needed Weekend Service. As - Needed Weekend Service shall be provided upon written request by RCTC. 3.2 As -Needed Weekend Service shall be provided at the rates and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Master Agreement. 3.3 The maximum compensation to be provided under this Amendment No. 1 for As -Needed Weekend Service shall not exceed Two Hundred Forty Seven Thousand Dollars ($247,000). The foregoing sum covers thirty-six (36) months of As -Needed Weekend Service. 3.4 The total not -to -exceed amount of the Master Agreement, as amended by this Amendment No. 1, shall be increased from Seven Hundred Seventy 17336.0002A\31164805.1 555 Five Thousand Dollars ($775,000) to One Million Twenty Two Thousand Dollars ($1,022,000). 3.4 Except as amended by this Amendment No. 1, all provisions of the Master Agreement, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment No. 1 3.5 This Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 3.6 This Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. [Signatures on following page] 17336.0002A\31164805.1 2 556 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT NO. 16-45-044-01 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY EMERGENCIES IN Anne Mayer, Executive Director Approved as to Form: Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel PEPE'S INC., a California corporation d/b/a PEPE'S TOWING SERVICE By: Signature Name Title Attest: By: Its: Secretary * A corporation requires the signatures of two corporate officers. One signature shall be that of the chairman of board, the president or any vice president and the second signature (on the attest line) shall be that of the secretary, any assistant secretary, the chief financial officer or any assistant treasurer of such corporation. If the above persons are not the intended signators, evidence of signature authority shall be provided to the Commission. 3 17336.0002A\31164805.1 557 AGENDA ITEM 8U RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Monica Morales, Management Analyst Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Amendment to TransTrack Systems, Inc. Agreement STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 08-62-005-08, Amendment No. 8 to Agreement No. 08-62-005-00 with TransTrack Systems, Inc. (TransTrack) to provide vanpool program financial module and custom programming services for an additional amount of $54,700, for a total amount not to exceed $611,700; and 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In December 2005, the Commission approved a sole source agreement with TransTrack for the Transit Performance Manager software application implementation and training package. The Commission approved a new agreement in July 2007 to continue end -user software license maintenance and support services. Subsequently, the Commission extended the agreement through the annual recurring contracts process and amended the agreement to add to the scope of services. Riverside County public transit operators use this software to consolidate and integrate their operations and performance data in TransTrack. The TransTrack data gathered and recorded enables the Commission and operators to retrieve real-time operation information and timely performance reports. The major accomplishments include additional customized reports to support the Commission's Annual Countywide State of Public Transit Report. TransTrack is an important tool in assisting Commission staff to review the transit operators' performance to ensure compliance with the farebox recovery ratio. During the annual preparation of Short Range Transit Plans (SRTP), the transit operators use the customized reports to complete required SRTP reports. SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) implemented a vanpool program in August 2017, and the Commission's Western County vanpool program (branded as VanClub) will start in summer of 2018. In September 2017, the Commission approved an amendment to the TransTrack agreement to incorporate SunLine and VanClub vanpool data and statistics into the TransTrack modules. The data gathered from the vanpool programs is entered into the National Transit Agenda Item 8U 558 Database and will generate Federal Transit Administration Section 5307 revenue in subsequent years. The basic vanpool module incorporated into the overall TransTrack suite did not include the TransTrack financial module and a custom data import from the VanClub database. Staff requests approval of Amendment No. 8 to the TransTrack agreement in the amount of $54,700 related to the addition of the financial module for the vanpool programs. The costs include: • Licensing, setup, and maintenance fees for the TransTrack financial module; • Training support; and • Programming services to create a data upload from the vanpool online system to TransTrack and other optional programming elements as needed. The additional TransTrack costs will be funded with 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Assistance Program funds. The new vanpool financial module will increase the overall annual TransTrack licensing fee from $34,000 to $38,800 per year, starting in Fiscal Year 2018/19 through FY 2020/21. The FY 2018/19 through FY 2020/21 TransTrack scope of services and schedule of fees and costs are included as Exhibits A and B to the amendment. Financial Information Yes FY 2017/18 $18,600 In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2018/19 Amount: $20,500 N/A FY 2019/20+ $15,600 Source of Funds: 2009 Measure A Western County Budget Adjustment: No No Commuter Assistance Program funds N/A GLA No.: F002187 65520 00000 0000 263 4165520 Fiscal Procedures Approved: �� Date: 05/30/2018 Attachment: Agreement No. 08-62-005-08 (Draft) Agenda Item 8U 559 ATTACHMENT 1 Agreement No. 08-62-005-08 AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO AGREEMENT FOR END -USER SOFTWARE LICENSE, TRAINING AND IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT AGREEMENT 1. PARTIES AND DATE This Amendment No. 8 to the End -User Software, License, Training and Implementation Support Agreement Services is made and entered into as of this day of 2018, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("Commission") and TRANSTRACK SYSTEMS, INC. ("Consultant") a California corporation. 2. RECITALS 2.1 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into an Agreement No. 08-62-005-00 dated July 2007 for the purpose of providing the Commission with End -User Software License, Training and Implementation Support (the "Master Agreement"). 2.2 The Commission and the Consultant entered into an Amendment No.1 to the Master Agreement on July 1, 2008 in order to extend the term, to provide compensation for renewal of the software license annual maintenance and support services agreement and annual escrow materials fee and for additional services or customized reports that may be requested by the Commission. 2.3 The Commission and the Consultant entered into an Amendment No. 2 to the Master Agreement on July 1, 2009 in order to extend the term, provide compensation for renewal of the software license annual maintenance and support services agreement and annual escrow materials fee, and for additional services or customized reports that may be requested by the Commission. 2.4 The Commission and the Consultant entered into an Amendment No. 3 to the Master Agreement on June 30, 2010 in order to extend the term, provide compensation for renewal of the software license annual maintenance and support services agreement and annual escrow materials fee, and for additional services or customized reports that may be requested by the Commission. 17336.00013\30015592.1 560 2.5 The Commission and the Consultant entered into an Amendment No. 4 to the Master Agreement on July 1, 2011 in order to extend the term, provide compensation for renewal of the software license annual maintenance and support services agreement and annual escrow materials fee, and for additional services or customized reports that may be requested by the Commission. 2.6 The Commission and the Consultant entered into an Amendment No. 5 to the Master Agreement on July 1, 2012 in order to extend the term, provide compensation for renewal of the software license annual maintenance and support services agreement and annual escrow materials fee, and for additional services or customized reports that may be requested by the Commission. 2.7 The Commission and the Consultant entered into an Amendment No. 6 to the Master Agreement on June 8, 2016 in order to extend the term, provide compensation for renewal of the software license annual maintenance, support services agreement and annual escrow materials fee. 2.8 The Commission and the Consultant entered into an Amendment No. 7 to the Master Agreement on November 22, 2017 in order to incorporate a base vanpool module into the TransTrack module that will support Sunline and RCTC vanpool operations. 2.9 The parties now desire to amend the Master Agreement in order add an additional vanpool program financial module and custom programming services. 3. TERMS 3.1 The Scope of Services for the Master Agreement shall be amended to include Services, as that term is defined in the Master Agreement, required to provide an additional vanpool program financial module and custom programming services, as more fully described in Exhibit "A" attached to this Amendment and incorporated herein by reference. 3.2 The maximum compensation for Services performed pursuant to this Amendment shall be Fifty -Four Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($54,700). Work shall be performed at the rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached to this Amendment and incorporated herein by reference. 3.3 The total not -to -exceed amount of the Master Agreement, as amended by this Amendment No. 8, shall be Six Hundred Eleven Thousand Dollars ($611,700). 17336.00013\30015592.1 2 561 3.4 Except as amended by this Amendment No. 8, all provisions of the Master Agreement, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1 through 7, including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment No. 8. 3.5 This Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 3.6 This Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 17336.00013\30015592.1 562 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT NO. 08-62-005-08 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION As Anne Mayer, Executive Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: IN Best Best & Krieger LLP Counsel to the Riverside County Transportation Commission A corporation requires the signatures of two corporate officers. TRANSTRACK SYSTEMS, INC. By: Signature Name Title Attest: By: Its: One signature shall be that of the chairman of board, the president or any vice president and the second signature (on the attest line) shall be that of the secretary, any assistant secretary, the chief financial officer or any assistant treasurer of such corporation. If the above persons are not the intended signators, evidence of signature authority shall be provided to RCTC. 17336.00013\30015592.1 4 563 EXHIBIT A FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 TRANSTRACK SCOPE OF SERVICES MODULAR ADD-ONS & CUSTOMIZED PROGRAMMING SERVICES Consultant (referred to in this exhibit as "Licensor") will create the following new Views, Imports, and Actions (i.e., stored procedures) to meet the on -going business requirements of Commission (referred to in this exhibit as "Licensee"). Modular Add-Ons: Vanpool Financial Module Customized Programming: Additional Software Engineering services are available on a time and materials basis at the rate specified in Exhibit B. The Licensee agrees to validate reports, imports and other customer applications and any subsequent revisions within 14 days of the report or revision being made available. Licensee is responsible for all validation, unless otherwise specified. Licensee may request custom modifications to the Software to allow for customized reports. Licensor has agreed to review the request for the custom modifications ("Modifications") and if the parties come to agreement to create the Modifications all terms and conditions of the License shall remain in full force and effect in addition to those listed in this Exhibit B. Should there be any conflict between the main body of the License and this Exhibit A, solely regarding the terms and conditions of the Services to create and maintain the Modifications, the language in this Exhibit A shall prevail. Modifications: 1. All Services to create, consult, train, maintain and service the Modifications will be billed to Licensee on a time and materials basis as further set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto. 2. Licensee will provide Licensor with specifications for the Modifications which shall include technical specifications, system requirements, end results desired, estimated time frame for completion and any other information Licensor deems necessary to receive to evaluate its ability to create the Modifications. 3. Licensor will review all requested items included above and discuss with Licensee the ability of Licensor to produce, service and maintain the Modifications as well as the estimated price for all Services for initial creation as well as continuing service and support. Licensor shall also inform Licensee if its timetable for completion is reasonable and can be accomplished in a timely fashion. 4. Once Licensor has reviewed all of the above and discussed same with Licensee, a final time table shall be agreed upon as well as an estimate for a range of Fees which will be invoiced to Licensee for the Modifications. After that point, should Licensor receive other requests from Licensee for further changes to the current Software over and above what is initially reviewed and requested above, the time table for completion and cost will be subject to change based on Licensor's evaluation of the changes and its ability to create and maintain what Licensee has requested. 17336.00013\30015592.1 564 5. Licensor will need the cooperation and access to certain of the Licensee's employees or data to create the Modifications to be able to be performed efficiently, correctly and in a timely manner. Any inability to provide the necessary advice, support or access to the people, data or materials necessary for Licensee's completion of the Modifications may require adjustments to the time table already agreed to as well as the costs for same. 6. After successful installation on the domain of the Modifications, Licensee shall have a fourteen (14) day testing/acceptance period ("Test Period") during which it shall utilize the Modifications and determine if they meet the specifications given to Licensor. During that period, Licensor shall provide advice and assistance to Licensee as requested. The costs for Licensor's assistance shall also be on a time and materials basis but will have already been included in the range of costs for the entire project. 7. Should there be any problems with the Modifications performing their desired results for the custom reports, Licensee shall so notify Licensor during the Test Period with specificity to enable Licensor to correct the problems. After Licensor has completed its adjustments as necessary to ensure that the Modifications meet the specifications, Licensee will have an additional seven (7) days in which to test and accept the revised Modifications. 8. If after that additional time, Licensor is unable to meet the criteria listed in the specifications given to Licensor, Licensee shall be entitled to reject the Modifications in whole. After rejection of the Modifications for failure to meet the required specifications, Licensee shall be entitled to the return of all Fees paid for the Modifications within a reasonable period after rejection. Notwithstanding the foregoing however, Licensee may not unreasonably reject the Modifications. 9. Return of the Fees for the Modifications shall be the sole and exclusive remedy for the inability of Licensor to meet the specifications of Licensee. All terms related to disclaimers of warranties as well as limits on liability listed in the main body of this License contained in Article IV, Sections 4 and 5 shall also apply to the Services as they relate to the Modifications. 10. All parts of Section 2 of Article IV of original contract remain in effect. 17336.00013\30015592.1 6 565 EXHIBIT B FY 2018/18 TRANSTRACK SCHEDULE OF FEES AND COSTS - PAYMENT SCHEDULE Deliverables Amount Payment Due Annual Maintenance & Support Services Increase for Vanpool $3,000 Due Upon Financial Module (July 1, 2018 -June 30, 2019) Amendment Signing Annual Maintenance & Support Services Increase for Vanpool $1,800 Due Upon Custom Data Import (July 1, 2018 -June 30, 2019) Amendment Signing Vanpool Finance Module License Add On Fee (one time) $15,000 Due Upon Amendment Signing Vanpool Finance Module Set Up Permissions and Look Up Views $3,600 Due Upon (24 hours @ $150 per hour) (one time) Amendment Signing Vanpool Basic Training for Financial Module (4 hours @ $150/hr.) $700 Due Upon (one time) Amendment Signing Custom Data Import of the Monthly Vanpool Data from $9,000 Due Upon VanClub.net (CSV file one time) (60 hours @ $150/hr) Completion of Work Optional - Additional Programming, not to exceed 80 hours $12,000 Due Upon @$150/hr (hours to be used at RCTC discretion) Completion of Work Annual Maintenance & Support Services Increase for Vanpool $3,000 Due at beginning of Financial Module (July 1, 2019 -June 30, 2020) Fiscal Year Annual Maintenance & Support Services Increase for Vanpool $1,800 Due at beginning of Custom Data Import (July 1, 2019 -June 30, 2020) Fiscal Year Annual Maintenance & Support Services Increase for Vanpool $3,000 Due at beginning of Financial Module (July 1, 2020 -June 30, 2021) Fiscal Year Annual Maintenance & Support Services Increase for Vanpool $1,800 Due at beginning of Custom Data Import (July 1, 2020 -June 30, 2021) Fiscal Year Total Amendment #8 Amount: $54,700 Hourly rates for additional services available on a time and material basis: Training and process review $150; Software Engineering $125; and Data Entry $45. Reference to "Amendment" in the table above shall mean and refer to Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement. 17336.00013\30015592.1 7 566 AGENDA ITEM 8V RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager FROM: Michelle McCamish, Management Analyst THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director Fiscal Year 2018/19 Measure A Commuter Assistance Buspool Subsidy SUBJECT: Funding Continuation Requests STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Set the monthly buspool subsidy at $2,350/month; 2) Authorize payment of the $2,350/month maximum subsidy per buspool for the period July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019, to the existing Riverside and Riverside II buspools; and 3) Require subsidy recipients to meet monthly buspool reporting requirements as supporting documentation to receive payments. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: As part of the Measure A Commuter Assistance Program, the Commission provides funding support to buspools used by Riverside County residents for their commutes along the State Route 91 (SR-91) corridor. The Commission adopted the Measure A buspool subsidy in October 1990 and established a monthly subsidy rate of $1,175 or $25/seat/month in support of commuter buspool operations. In July 2004, the Commission set the subsidy rate at $1,645/month ($35/seat/month) to help offset increases to operational costs during the previous 14 years. To provide additional guidance, the Commission also established a minimum buspool ridership policy in June 1995. The policy requires staff to report to the Commission when a buspool's ridership falls to 25 or below and to seek direction regarding the continuation of the subsidy. DISCUSSION: Like all commuter assistance incentives provided by the Commission to encourage use of alternative modes of transportation, the $35/seat/month subsidy is administered as a user end subsidy. The Commission's subsidy is an important factor that makes buspools an attractive alternative for these commuters with roundtrip commutes in excess of 100 miles. Ongoing increases in costs have prompted the buspools to inquire about a subsidy increase to help offset the increases. Agenda Item 8V 567 Staff reviewed the buspool captain requests and concurs with an increase to the subsidy rate. The monthly cost of each existing buspool varies according to the number of route miles and the resulting negotiated service price. Staff recommends a monthly subsidy increase from $1,645 to $2,350 ($50/seat/month) which still maintains an average subsidy rate of 15 percent. This subsidy rate remains cost-effective compared to the typical public transit subsidy rate of 80 percent. Unlike some of the other Commission -approved ridesharing incentives that have a limited term, the buspool subsidy is ongoing. To renew its annual subsidy, an existing buspool is required to: Request in writing, continuation of funding from the Commission for the new fiscal year; Consistently meet minimum ridership requirements; and Submit monthly ridership reports throughout the year. The two existing buspools have completed all the requirements for funding as set forth by the Commission, including the submittal of monthly ridership reports and annual funding continuation requests. They have consistently met the minimum ridership level of 25 riders per month and have collectively averaged 28 riders/month/buspool. The traffic and environmental benefits projected for FY 2017/18 by offering this subsidy are illustrated below: Buspools Average Roundtrip Annual Miles Saved Annual One -Way Riders/Month Distance Trips Reduced Riverside 31 —121 mi 949,846 15,752 Riverside II 25 —137 mi 880,088 12,848 Estimated Pounds of Emissions Reduced Miles Saved Trips Reduced 9,206 1,829,934 28,600 In reducing the number of vehicles on SR-91 during peak periods, the buspool program saved more than 1.8 million miles and 9,206 pounds of vehicle emissions in FY 2017/18. The buspool subsidy is funded by Measure A funds, and $80,000 is included in the FY 2018/19 budget for this program. Based on the established $2,350/month per buspool subsidy policy, the funds will support the continuation of the two existing buspools plus up to one new buspool through FY 2018/19. Agenda Item 8V Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2018/19 Amount: $80,000 Source of Funds: 2009 Measure A Western County Public Transit/Commuter Assistance funds Budget Adjustment: No GL/Project Accounting No.: 002109 81030 00000 0000 263 4181002 Fiscal Procedures Approved: �� Date: H—Iji Attachments: 1) Riverside I Renewal Request 2) Riverside II Renewal Request Agenda Item 8V 569 ATTACHMENT 1 CATALINA FUENTES Send correspondences to: Raytheon Company 2000 E. El Segundo Blvd. PO Box 902 Bldg. R1 Rm. 9Z24 MS. B500 El Segundo, CA 90245-4501 February 27, 2018 Attn.: Michelle McCamish, Management Analyst Commuter & Motorist Assistance Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Dear Ms. McCamish, In compliance with the requirements of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), I am requesting an extension of funding for the period of July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019 for the "Riverside" to El Segundo Commuter Buspool. I am the buspool coordinator and I coordinate this buspool independently from any employer. The monthly cost to operate this bus pool from Cee People Tours, LLC is $315. RCTC provides a $35 monthly subsidy Raytheon & Boeing provides a $75 monthly subsidy and the remaining $205 is paid for by the riders. All non -Raytheon & Non -Boeing employees pay $280. The following is the Riverside to El Segundo Bus pool schedule: AM Departure Galleria at Tyler, Riverside 4:10 a.m. AM Departure Corona Park & Ride- 20 E. Grand Blvd. 4:22 a.m. AM Arrival Raytheon, El Segundo 5:13 a.m. PM Departure Raytheon, El Segundo 3:00 p.m. PM Arrival Corona Park & Ride Lot 4:45 p.m. PM Arrival Galleria at Tyler, Riverside 5:00 p.m. Information on this buspool is available with rideshare programs at Raytheon Aerospace Corporation, Boeing and the Los Angeles Air Force base. Employees receive this information through direct mailings, newsletter articles, and electronic messaging from these employers. These employer rideshare programs also share this information with other local employee transportation coordinators. Thank you for your continued support of this successful buspool program. Sincerely, Catalina Fuentes Riverside Bus pool Coordinator This document does not contain technology or technical data controlled under either the U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulations or the U.S. Export Administration Regulations. 570 ATTACHMENT 2 TRACY HUTCHINSON Send correspondences to: Raytheon Company 2000 E. El Segundo Blvd. El Segundo, CA 90245 April 4, 2018 Attn.: Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager Riverside County Transportation Commission P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Dear Mr. Cunanan, In compliance with the requirements of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC), I am requesting an extension of funding for the period of July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019 for the "Riverside 2" to El Segundo Commuter Buspool. I am the buspool coordinator and I coordinate this buspool independently from any employer. The monthly cost to operate this buspool from Royal American Tours is $330. RCTC provides a $35 monthly subsidy per seat and the remaining $295 is paid for by the riders and their employers. The following is the Riverside to El Segundo Buspool schedule: AM Departure Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station 4:20 a.m. AM Departure North Main Corona Metrolink Station 4:40 a.m. AM Arrival Raytheon, El Segundo 5:40 a.m. PM Departure Raytheon, El Segundo 3:20 p.m. PM Arrival North Main Corona Metrolink Station 5:15 p.m. PM Arrival Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station 5:40 p.m. Information on this buspool is available with rideshare programs at Raytheon, Boeing, Aerospace Corporation, and the Los Angeles Air Force base. Employees receive this information through direct mailings, newsletter articles, and electronic messaging from these employers. These employer rideshare programs also share this information with other local employee transportation coordinators. Thank you for your continued support of this successful buspool program. Sincerely, I Tracy Hutchinson Riverside 2 Buspool Coordinator 571 AGENDA ITEM 8W RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission Marlin Feenstra, Project Delivery Director FROM: Gary Ratliff, Facilities Administrator THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director Agreement for Closed Circuit Television System Maintenance/Repair and SUBJECT. Installation Services STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 18-24-089-00 to American System Integrators for closed circuit television (CCTV) system maintenance/repair and installation services for a three-year term, and two, two-year options to extend the agreement, in an amount of $1,399,060, plus a contingency amount of $69,953, for a total amount not to exceed $1,469,013; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreements, including option years, on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required for these services. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Commission owns and operates nine commuter rail stations and one operations control center: Corona -North Main, Corona -West, Jurupa Valley-Pedley, Moreno Valley -March Field, Perris -Downtown, Perris -South, Riverside -Downtown, Riverside -Hunter Park, Riverside -La Sierra, and the Riverside Downtown Operations Control Center. A digital CCTV security system at each of these station locations monitors a variety of station environments and activities on a 24-hour basis in order to enhance public safety, reduce vandalism, and prevent crime. The CCTV security system supports law enforcement and provides tools to identify criminal activity and apprehend suspects. The system consists of a total of 154 cameras distributed among the various station sites and has recently been updated with a new digital camera system along with a new recording storage system. CCTV security system maintenance and repair services are essential to provide continued public safety and security for Metrolink commuters, as well as preserving and maintaining the Commission's property. Quarterly maintenance includes cleaning, adjusting, and focusing cameras, housings, and lenses; cleaning/inspecting monitors, matrix controllers, VCR/DVR, broadband video equipment, transmission equipment, fiber lines; and configuration of system hardware, software, and Agenda Item 8W 572 architecture. Under Commission supervision, quarterly maintenance services will be conducted at each station for a fixed price during the term of the agreement. On -call repair services will be based on the successful contractor's proposed fixed labor rates, material cost, and associated markup. Staff also identified additional CCTV capital improvements that will be beneficial to commuter safety and operations of the stations. These improvements will be funded with Proposition 1B Security Grant Funds. Improvements include placing additional cameras at the Perris Valley Line stations, driveway cameras, and servers/monitors/information technology equipment and infrastructure to support additional video surveillance. Procurement Process Staff determined the weighted factor method of source selection to be the most appropriate for this procurement, as it allows the Commission to identify the most advantageous proposal with price and other factors considered. Non -price factors include elements such as qualifications of firm, personnel, and the ability to respond to the Commission's needs for CCTV maintenance/repair and installation services, as set forth under the terms of the request for proposals (RFP) No. 18-24-089-00. RFP No. 18-24-089-00 was released on February 15, 2018. A public notice was advertised in the Press Enterprise, and the RFP was posted on the Commission's PlanetBids website, which is accessible through the Commission's website. Utilizing PlanetBids, emails were sent to 152 firms, 35 of which are located in Riverside County. Through the PlanetBids site, 30 firms downloaded the RFP; 4 of these firms are located in Riverside County. A pre -proposal conference was held on February 22, 2018, and was attended by 2 firms; 1 firm was local to Riverside County. Staff responded to all questions submitted by potential proposers prior to the March 8, 2018 clarification deadline date. One firm — American System Integrators (Irvine) — submitted a proposal prior to the 2:00 p.m. submittal deadline on March 27, 2018. The proposal submitted was a responsive and responsible proposal. Since staff received one proposal, it reviewed the solicitation specifications for undue restrictiveness and surveyed potential firms that chose not to submit a proposal. Reasons for not submitting a proposal included other contractors having limited staff, including staff that was not certified to perform the services. Staff concluded that the requirements listed in the scope of work and other terms and conditions were not unnecessarily or excessively restrictive, an adequate opportunity to compete was provided, and factors other than the solicitation were responsible for the receipt of one proposal for these services. An evaluation committee comprised of Commission staff evaluated the proposal in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth in the RFP. Accordingly, the evaluation committee provided final scoring based on a comprehensive evaluation of the written proposal. Based on the evaluation committee's assessment, it was determined American System Integrators to be qualified to perform the work outlined in the scope of services. Additionally, staff reviewed the Agenda Item 8W 573 current rates for these services and determined that the rates proposed by American System Integrators are fair and reasonable. As a result of the evaluation committee's assessment of the written proposal, the evaluation committee recommends contract award for CCTV maintenance/repair and installation services to American System Integrators for a three-year term, and two, two-year options in the amount of $1,399,060, plus a contingency of $69,953, for a total amount not to exceed $1,469,013. Staff estimates that 70 percent of the cost will be related to routine maintenance and on -call repair services, while 30 percent will consist of capital improvements. The Commission's model maintenance and repair services agreement will be entered into with the consultant subject to any changes approved by the Executive Director and pursuant to legal counsel review. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2018/19 Amount: $369,500 N/A FY 2019/20+ $1,099,513 Local Transportation Fund, No Source of Funds: 2009 Measure A Western County Rail, and Budget Adjustment: N/A Proposition 1B (Security) funds 244001 73315/73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301\ 244002 73315/73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 \ 244003 73315/73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 \ 244004 73315/73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 \ 244006 73315/73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 $1,020,013 244010 73315/73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 / GL/Project Accounting No.: 244020 73315/73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 / 244021 73315/73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301 / 244022 73315/73304 00000 0000 103 24 73301/ 004012 9070100000 0000 265 33 90501\ $449,000 004012 9060100000 0000 265 33 90501/ Fiscal Procedures Approved: �� Date: 05/25/2018 Attachment: Draft Maintenance and Repair Services Agreement No. 18-24-089-00 Agenda Item 8W 574 ATTACHMENT 1 Agreement No. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR METROLINK STATIONS WITH[ 1 PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this _ day of , 2018, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("the Commission") ., a ("Consultant"). 2. RECITALS. 2.1 Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional consulting services required by Commission on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is a professional consultant, experienced in providing closed circuit television ("CCTV") system maintenance services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of Commission. 2.2 Commission desires to engage Consultant to render certain consulting services for the CCTV system maintenance services for the Metrolink commuter stations Project ("Project") as set forth herein. 2.3 Funding for the Project may be provided, in whole or in part, with Proposition 1 B funds received from the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans"). Consultant shall comply with all applicable Caltrans funding requirements as set forth herein. 3. TERMS. 3.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to Commission all labor materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately provide professional consulting services and advice on various issues affecting the decisions of Commission regarding the Project and on other programs and matters affecting Commission, hereinafter referred to as "Services". The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations. 3.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date first specified above to , unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. 575 3.3 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, the Commission shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of the Commission, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services. 3.4 Independent Contractor; Control and Payment of Subordinates. The Services shall be performed by Consultant under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, method and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. Commission retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and Consultant is not an employee of Commission. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall not be employees of Commission and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.5 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of Commission. 3.6 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to Commission that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence and experience upon written approval of Commission. In the event that Commission and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, Commission shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause, pursuant to provisions of Section 3.16 of this Agreement. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: 3.7 Commission's Representative. Commission hereby designates Executive Director, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Commission's Representative"). Commission's representative shall have the power to act on behalf of Commission for all purposes under this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction from any person other than Commission's Representative or his or her designee. 3.8 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for 17336.00600\30585120.1 576 all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his or her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement. 3.9 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with Commission staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to Commission's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times. 3.10 Standard of Care; Licenses. Consultant shall perform the Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standard generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from Commission, any Services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein, and shall be fully responsible to the Commission for all damages and other liabilities provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement arising from the Consultant's errors and omissions. 3.11 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to Commission, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold Commission, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 3.12 Insurance. 3.12.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that it has secured all insurance required under this section, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the Commission. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. 17336.00600\30585120.1 577 3.12.2 Minimum Requirements. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Agreement by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Consultant shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage: (A) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001 or exact equivalent); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage (form CA 0001, code 1 (any auto) or exact equivalent); and (3) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. (B) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability. $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) if Consultant has an employees, Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability. Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. Employer's Practices Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. 3.12.3 Professional Liability. [ INCLUDE ONLY IF APPLICABLE - DELETE OTHERWISE 1 Consultant shall procure and maintain, and require its sub - consultants to procure and maintain, for a period of five (5) years following completion of the Project, errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to their profession. Such insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000 [INCREASE IF NECESSARY - OTHERWISE LEAVE AS IS AND DELETE THIS NOTE I per claim. This insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement and shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant. "Covered Professional Services" as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy must "pay on behalf of" the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's dutyto defend. 3.12.4 Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the Commission to add the following provisions to the insurance policies: (A) General Liability. (i) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for (1) bodily Injury and property damage; (2) personal Injury/advertising Injury; (3) premises/operations liability; (4) products/completed operations liability; (5) 17336.00600\30585120.1 578 aggregate limits that apply per Project; (6) explosion, collapse and underground (UCX) exclusion deleted; (7) contractual liability with respect to this Agreement; (8) broad form property damage; and (9) independent consultants coverage. (ii) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to this Agreement. (iii) The policy shall give the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, and agents insured status using ISO endorsement forms 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (iv) The additional insured coverage under the policy shall be "primary and non-contributory" and will not seek contribution from the Commission's insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 01 04 13, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (B) Automobile Liability. The automobile liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant's scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. (C) Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. (i) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. (ii) The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by the Consultant. (D) All Coverages. 17336.00600\30585120.1 579 (i) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits set forth hereunder. (ii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits set forth herein shall be available to the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds under said policies. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured; whichever is greater. (iii) The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the Commission (if agreed to in a written contract or agreement) before the Commission's own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. The umbrella/excess policy shall be provided on a "following form" basis with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying policy(ies). (iv) Consultant shall provide the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement, except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the Commission at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. (v) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by another claims -made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. (vi) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the Commission, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification. 17336.00600\30585120.1 (vii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, Commission has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by Commission will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or Commission will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, Commission may cancel this Agreement. The Commission may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (viii) Neither the Commission nor any of its directors, officials, officers, employees or agents shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that: 3.12.5 Deductibles and Self -Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Commission. If the Commission does not approve the deductibles or self -insured retentions as presented, Consultant shall guarantee that, at the option of the Commission, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents; or, (2) the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses. 3.12.6 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the Commission. 3.12.7 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish Commission with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this Agreement on forms satisfactory to the Commission. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the Commission before work commences. The Commission reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 3.12.8 Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that they have secured all insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the Commission as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, the Commission may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 17336.00600\30585120.1 581 3.13 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.14 Fees and Payment. 3.14.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto. The total compensation shall not exceed [_INSERT WRITTEN DOLLAR AMOUNT 1 ($[ INSERT NUMERICAL DOLLAR AMOUNT 1) without written approval of Commission's Executive Director ("Total Compensation"). Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement. 3.14.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to Commission a monthly statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. Commission shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon. 3.14.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by Commission. 3.14.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, Commission may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by Commission to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from Commission's Executive Director. 3.15 Accounting Records. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred and fees charged under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a represen- tative of Commission during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. 17336.00600\30585120.1 582 Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. 3.16 Termination of Agreement. 3.16.1 Grounds for Termination. Commission may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been fully and adequately rendered to Commission through the effective date of the termination, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.16.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, Commission may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data, as defined below, and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 3.16.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, Commission may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.17 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: CONSULTANT: COMMISSION: Attn: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: Executive Director Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.18 Ownershia of Materials/Confidential 3.18.1 Documents & Data. This Agreement creates an exclusive and perpetual license for Commission to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sub -license any and all copyrights and designs embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, 17336.00600\30585120.1 583 materials, data and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that Commission is granted an exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the Commission. Commission shall not be limited in anyway in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at Commission's sole risk. 3.18.2 Intellectual Property. In addition, Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest (including copyright, patent, trade secret and other proprietary rights) in all plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data, computer programs or software and source code, enhancements, documents, and any and all works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium or expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or other data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer media ("Intellectual Property") prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement as well as any other such Intellectual Property prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement. The Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest in Intellectual Property developed or modified under this Agreement whether or not paid for wholly or in part by Commission, whether or not developed in conjunction with Consultant, and whether or not developed by Consultant. Consultant will execute separate written assignments of any and all rights to the above referenced Intellectual Property upon request of Commission. Consultant shall also be responsible to obtain in writing separate written assignments from any subcontractors or agents of Consultant of any and all right to the above referenced Intellectual Property. Should Consultant, either during or following termination of this Agreement, desire to use any of the above -referenced Intellectual Property, it shall first obtain the written approval of the Commission. All materials and documents which were developed or prepared by the Consultant for general use prior to the execution of this Agreement and which are not the copyright of any other party or publicly available and any other computer applications, shall continue to be the property of the Consultant. However, unless otherwise identified and stated prior to execution of this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has 17336.00600\30585120.1 M the right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Intellectual Property as provided herein. Commission further is granted by Consultant a non-exclusive and perpetual license to copy, use, modify or sub -license any and all Intellectual Property otherwise owned by Consultant which is the basis or foundation for any derivative, collective, insurrectional, or supplemental work created under this Agreement. 3.18.3 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of Commission, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use Commission's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of Commission. 3.18.4Infringement Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, for any alleged infringement of any patent, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, or any other proprietary right of any person or entity in consequence of the use on the Project by Commission of the Documents & Data, including any method, process, product, or concept specified or depicted. 3.19 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement. 3.20 Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and costs of such actions. 3.21 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants, and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation, the payment of all 17336.00600\30585120.1 585 consequential damages, attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant shall defend, at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against the Commission or its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse the Commission and its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnity shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Commission or its directors, officials, officers, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant's Services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. This Section 3.21 shall survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement. 3.22 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be supplemented, amended, or modified by a writing signed by both parties. 3.23 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 3.24 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 3.25 Commission's Right to Employ Other Consultants. The Commission reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project. 3.26 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties, and shall not be assigned by Consultant without the prior written consent of Commission. 3.27 Prohibited Interests and Conflicts. 3.27.1 Solicitation. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicitor secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, Commission shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. 17336.00600\30585120.1 3.27.2 Conflict of Interest. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of Commission, during the term of his or her service with Commission, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.27.3 Conflict of Employment. Employment by the Consultant of personnel currently on the payroll of the Commission shall not be permitted in the performance of this Agreement, even though such employment may occur outside of the employee's regular working hours or on weekends, holidays or vacation time. Further, the employment by the Consultant of personnel who have been on the Commission payroll within one year prior to the date of execution of this Agreement, where this employment is caused by and or dependent upon the Consultant securing this or related Agreements with the Commission, is prohibited. 3.27.4 Employment Adverse to the Commission. Consultant shall notify the Commission, and shall obtain the Commission's written consent, prior to accepting work to assist with or participate in a third -party lawsuit or other legal or administrative proceeding against the Commission during the term of this Agreement. 3.28 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of Commission's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related Commission programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. 3.29 Subcontracting. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work or Services required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of the Commission. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. 3.30 Prevailing Wages. 3.30.1 Payment of Prevailing Wage Rates Required. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certified that it is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq. ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain "public works" and "maintenance" projects. Since the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and since the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The Commission shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rate of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for 17336.00600\30585120.1 587 each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 3.30.2 DIR Registration. Since the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the Project and require the same of any subconsultants. This Project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Consultant's sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. 3.31 Employment of Apprentices. This Agreement shall not prevent the employment of properly indentured apprentices in accordance with the California Labor Code, and no employer or labor union shall refuse to accept otherwise qualified employees as indentured apprentices on the work performed hereunder solely on the ground of race, creed, national origin, ancestry, color or sex. Every qualified apprentice shall be paid the standard wage paid to apprentices under the regulations of the craft or trade in which he or she is employed and shall be employed only in the craft or trade to which he or she is registered. If California Labor Code Section 1777.5 applies to the Services, Consultant and any subcontractor hereunder who employs workers in any apprenticeable craft or trade shall apply to the joint apprenticeship council administering applicable standards for a certificate approving Consultant or any sub -consultant for the employment and training of apprentices. Upon issuance of this certificate, Consultant and any sub -consultant shall employ the number of apprentices provided for therein, as well as contribute to the fund to administer the apprenticeship program in each craft or trade in the area of the work hereunder. The parties expressly understand that the responsibility for compliance with provisions of this Section and with Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 of the California Labor Code in regard to all apprenticeable occupations lies with Consultant. 3.32 No Waiver. Failure of Commission to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times. 3.33 Eight -Hour Law. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Labor Code, eight hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work, and the time of service of any 17336.00600\30585120.1 worker employed on the work shall be limited and restricted to eight hours during any one calendar day, and forty hours in any one calendar week, except when payment for overtime is made at not less than one and one-half the basic rate for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day ("Eight -Hour Law"), unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight -Hour Law. Consultant shall forfeit to Commission as a penalty, $50.00 for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by him, or by any sub -consultant under him, for each calendar day during which such workman is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any calendar day and forty hours in any one calendar week without such compensation for overtime violation of the provisions of the California Labor Code, unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight -Hour Law. 3.34 Subpoenas or Court Orders. Should Consultant receive a subpoena or court order related to this Agreement, the Services or the Project, Consultant shall immediately provide written notice of the subpoena or court order to the Commission. Consultant shall not respond to any such subpoena or court order until notice to the Commission is provided as required herein, and shall cooperate with the Commission in responding to the subpoena or court order. 3.35 Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the indemnification and confidentiality obligations, and the obligations related to receipt of subpoenas or court orders, shall survive any such expiration or termination. 3.36 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.37 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 3.38 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 3.39 Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 3.40 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.41 Conflicting Provisions. In the event that provisions of any attached exhibits conflict in any way with the provisions set forth in this Agreement, the language, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall control the actions and obligations of the Parties and the interpretation of the Parties' understanding concerning the performance of the Services. 17336.00600\30585120.1 M 3.42 Headings. Article and Section Headings, paragraph captions or marginal headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall have no effect in the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. 3.43 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein, without the prior written consent of the Commission. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.44 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. 3.45 State Funding Requirements. Consultant shall also fully and adequately comply with the Caltrans provisions included in Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 17336.00600\30585120.1 590 SIGNATURE PAGE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR METROLINK STATIONS WITH IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed on the date first written above. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Im John F. Tavaglione Chair Approved as to Form: Best, Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel CONSULTANT Signature Name Title ATTEST: By: Its: * A corporation requires the signatures of two corporate officers. One signature shall be that of the chairman of board, the president or any vice president and the second signature (on the attest line) shall be that of the secretary, any assistant secretary, the chief financial officer or any assistant treasurer of such corporation. If the above persons are not the intended signators, evidence of signature authority shall be provided to RCTC. 17336.00600\30585120.1 591 EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES (SCOPE FROM RFP TO BE INCLUDED EXHIBIT "B" - SCHEDULE OF SERVICES TO BE INCLUDED EXHIBIT "C" - COST PROPOSAL OF CONSULTANT TO BE INSERTED 17336.00600\30585120.1 592 EXHIBIT "D" ADDITIONAL CALTRANS/PROP 1113 PROVISIONS 1. ADDITIONAL ACCOUNTING REQUIREMENTS A. Invoices. i. Invoices shall be mailed to Commission's Contract Administrator at the following address: Riverside County Transportation Commission Attention: Accounts Payable P.O. 12008 Riverside, CA 92502 ii. Consultant must have at least one copy of supporting backup documentation for costs incurred and claimed for reimbursement by Consultant. Consultant agrees to submit supporting backup documentation with invoices if requested by Commission. Acceptable backup documentation includes, but is not limited to, Consultant's progress payments to subcontractors, copies of cancelled checks showing amounts made payable to vendors and subcontractors, and/or a computerized summary of Project costs. 2 ADDITIONAL COST PRINCIPLES AND ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS In addition to the requirement to comply with 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31.000 et seq., Consultant also agrees to comply with federal procedures in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Any costs for which payment has been made to Consultant that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 2 CFR, Part 200 are subject to repayment by Consultant to Commission. All subcontracts in excess of $25,000 shall contain the above provisions. In addition, to the extent applicable, Consultant shall comply with Local Assistance Procedures, Public Contract Code (PCC) 10300-10334 (procurement of goods), PCC 10335-10381 (non-A&E services), and other applicable STATE and FEDERAL regulations. 3. TRANSPORTATION AND SUBSISTENCE COSTS Reimbursement for transportation and subsistence costs shall not exceed the rates specified in Exhibit "C" of the Agreement. In addition, payments to Consultant for travel and subsistence expenses claimed for reimbursement or applied as local match credit shall not exceed rates authorized to be paid exempt non -represented State employees under current State Department of Personnel Administration (DPA) rules, unless otherwise 17336.00600\30585120.1 593 authorized by Commission. If the rates invoiced are in excess of those authorized DPA rates, and Commission has not otherwise approved said rates, then Consultant is responsible for the cost difference and any overpayments shall be reimbursed to the Commission on demand. 4 RETENTION OF RECORDS/AUDIT For the purpose of determining compliance with Public Contract Code 10115, et seq. and Title 21, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 21, Section 2500 et seq., when applicable and other matters connected with the performance of this Agreement pursuant to Government Code 8546.7; Consultant, subconsultants, and Commission shall maintain and make available for inspection all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of this Agreement, including but not limited to, the costs of administering this Agreement. All parties shall make such materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the Agreement period and for three years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. The State, State Auditor, Commission, or any duly authorized representative of the State Government shall have access to any books, records, and documents of Consultant and it's certified public accountants (CPA) work papers that are pertinent to this Agreement and indirect cost rates (ICR) for audit, examinations, excerpts, and transactions, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested. Subcontracts in excess of $25,000 shall contain this provision. 5 ACCOUNTING SYSTEM Consultant and its subcontractors shall establish and maintain an accounting system and records that properly accumulate and segregate expenditures by line item for the Services. The accounting system of Consultant and its subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion, and provide support for reimbursement payment vouchers or invoices. 6 AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this Agreement that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by Commission's Chief Financial Officer. Not later than 30 days after issuance of the final audit report, Consultant may request a review by Commission's Chief Financial Officer of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by Commission shall excuse Consultant from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 17336.00600\30585120.1 594 7. EQUIPMENT PURCHASE Prior authorization, in writing, by Commission's Contract Administrator shall be required before Consultant enters into any unbudgeted purchase order, or subcontract for supplies, equipment, or services. Consultant shall provide an evaluation of the necessity or desirability of incurring such costs. For purchase of any item, service or consulting work not covered in the Project Budget and exceeding $5,000 prior authorization, in writing, by Commission's Contract Administrator is required. Three competitive quotations must be submitted with the request for such purchase, or the absence of bidding must be adequately justified. Any equipment purchased as a result of this Agreement is subject to the following: Consultant shall maintain an inventory of all nonexpendable property. Nonexpendable property is defined as having a useful life of at least two years and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more. If the purchased equipment needs replacement and is sold or traded in, Commission shall receive a proper refund or credit at the conclusion of this Agreement, or if this Agreement is terminated, Consultant may either keep the equipment and credit Commission in an amount equal to its fair market value, or sell such equipment at the best price obtainable at a public or private sale, in accordance with established Commission procedures; and credit Commission in an amount equal to the sales price. If Consultant elects to keep the equipment, fair market value shall be determined at Consultant's expense, on the basis of a competent independent appraisal of such equipment. Appraisals shall be obtained from an appraiser mutually agreeable to by Commission and Consultant. If Consultant determines to sell the equipment, the terms and conditions of such sale must be approved in advance by Commission. 2 CFR, Part 200 requires a credit to Federal funds when participating equipment with a fair market value greater than $5,000 is credited to the Project. All subcontracts in excess $25,000 shall contain the above provisions 8. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE A. Consultant's signature affixed herein shall constitute a certification under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that Consultant has, unless exempt, complied with, the nondiscrimination program requirements of Government Code Section 12990 and Title 2, California Administrative Code, Section 8103. B. During the performance of this Agreement, Consultant and its subconsultants shall not unlawfully discriminate, harass, or allow harassment against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, race, color, ancestry, religious creed, national origin, physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), mental disability, medical condition (e.g., cancer), age (over 40), marital status, and denial of family care leave. Consultant and subconsultants shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants for 17336.00600\30585120.1 595 employment are free from such discrimination and harassment. Consultant and subconsultants shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code §12990 (a-f) et seq.) and the applicable regulations promulgated there under (California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 7285 et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code Section 12990 (a-f), set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations, are incorporated into this Contract by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. Consultant and its subconsultants shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other Agreement. 9. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD CERTIFICATION In accordance with Public Contract Code Section 10296, and by signing this Agreement, Consultant certifies under penalty of perjury that no more than one final unappealable finding of contempt of court by a federal court has been issued against Consultant within the immediately preceding two-year period, because of Consultant's failure to comply with an order of a federal court that orders Consultant to comply with an order of the National Labor Relations Board. 17336.00600\30585120.1 596 AGENDA ITEM 8X RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Josefina Clemente, Transit Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Years 2018/19 — 2020/21 Short Range Transit Plans STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the Fiscal Years 2018/19 — 2020/21 Short Range Transit Plans (SRTPs) for the cities of Banning, Beaumont, Corona, and Riverside; Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA); Riverside Transit Agency (RTA); SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine); and the Commission's Commuter Rail Program. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Riverside County FYs 2018/19 — 2020/21 SRTPs cover the three apportionment areas of the county and are comprised of plans for the municipal operators, RTA, SunLine, PVVTA, and the Commission's Commuter Rail Program in Western Riverside and Coachella Valley. The SRTPs serve as the county's primary justification for federal and state grants for transit operations and capital projects and provide a short-term vision of public transportation for the county including strategies that will help guide transportation decisions over the next three years. Under state law, the Commission is tasked with the responsibility to identify, analyze, and recommend potential productivity improvements to ensure federal, state, and local funds are allocated to transit operators to provide needed transit services for county residents. This year's plan update is the culmination of a planning process that involves determination of transit needs in each service area and ability to meet those needs, analysis of current transportation services, a review of service performance measures and proposals for service initiatives aimed at improving service. The SRTP process also requires the transit operators to address recommendations made by regular performance audits. To meet county residents' growing demand for more reliable transit service and stronger intercity and regional connectivity, operators are focusing on implementing modified routes, improved frequency, refined schedules and streamlined bus operations. For FY 2018/19, services are continuing on RapidLink Gold Line express (linking Corona, Downtown Riverside and University of California) and CommuterLink routes 200 and 205 (utilizing new SR-91 intercounty express lanes). Procurement of needed vehicles is also ongoing for both expansion and replacement of aging buses. Other capital projects such as operations and maintenance facilities, transit centers, Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) facility upgrades, bus shelters and Agenda Item 8X 597 associated bus stop enhancements are planned for construction and installation to improve service quality and reliability. A sizable portion of each agency's capital plan also includes software system network infrastructure upgrades and safety and security equipment such as security lighting, on -board camera system, and bus stop solar -powered lighting devices to help ensure safety of transit systems and passengers. In addition, necessary access and mobility improvements are also being implemented to better serve the county's lower -income, elderly and disabled populations. While the SRTPs include projected financial needs, the actual allocation of funds will occur via the public hearing to be conducted at the July Commission meeting. City of Banning The city of Banning (Banning) works closely with the city of Beaumont (Beaumont) to provide a seamless transit system for the residents of Banning, Beaumont, and the unincorporated areas of Cabazon, Cherry Valley, and the commercial area of the Morongo Band of Mission Indians reservation. Planned services for FY 2018/19 include: • Sustain and enhance service levels in Cabazon with Low Carbon Transit Operations (LCTOP) program funds; • Rebuild existing CNG facility to ensure a reliable, safe, and efficient fueling station in the Pass area; • Purchase and install passenger information signs at key stops to provide clients with next bus information; and • Evaluate strategies to increase revenue and service productivity. City of Beaumont Beaumont Transit provides both Dial -A -Ride and fixed route services and works closely with Banning to provide a seamless transit system in the Pass Area. Planned services for FY 2018/19 include: • Launch a new Commuter Link 125 to connect Pass Area with Redlands; • Implement a Free Fare project funded with LCTOP program funds; • Conduct a Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) in conjunction with but independent of Banning Pass Transit; and • Promote a beach train travel training opportunity for youth in the Pass Area. City of Corona The city of Corona (Corona) operates a fixed route system known as the Corona Cruiser and a Dial -A -Ride program for seniors and persons with disabilities. Corona closely coordinates all Agenda Item 8X 598 transfers with both RTA and the Commission's Commuter Rail services. Planned services for FY 2018/19 include: • Introduce additional morning peak service for Corona Cruiser; • Implement a Free Fare program and review feasibility of establishing an ADA Subscription Services Policy; • Release solicitation for a new contract for transit operations; and • Conduct a COA to identify strengths as well as opportunities for service improvements. City of Riverside — Special Services Riverside Special Services (RSS) operates a 24-hour advance reservation Dial -A -Ride for seniors and persons with disabilities within the Riverside city limits. The program serves as an alternative to RTA's transit service for seniors and persons with disabilities unable to use fixed route service. Planned services for FY 2018/19 include: • Conduct a comprehensive operations study to look at overall operations and staffing to identify strengths and potential areas of improving the current transit system; • Complete capital projects started in FY 2017/18 including electronic fare collection module, and bus procurement; and • Continue rebranding and marketing campaign. Palo Verde Valley Transit Agenc The PVVTA provides fixed route service and a transportation reimbursement program for individuals who cannot ride the public bus system. The fixed route service can deviate up to three-quarters of a mile away from the actual fixed route. Service is provided within the city of Blythe and surrounding unincorporated areas in the Palo Verde Valley. Planned services for FY 2018/19 include: • Conclude the FTA Rides 2 Wellness demonstration service (Blythe Wellness Express) for non -emergency medical access to the Coachella Valley and start planning for continuance of service beyond the demonstration period; • Modify Route 3 service by eliminating two hours from the daily schedule and improve Route 4 by adding a return tripper at 4:00 p.m.; and • Continue service contract with Transportation Concepts through June 30, 2019, with an option to extend agreement for three additional one-year terms. Riverside Transit Agency RTA provides local, intercity, and regional transportation services. As the Consolidated Transportation Service Agency (CTSA) for Western Riverside County, RTA is responsible for coordinating transit services throughout the service area and providing driver training and grant Agenda Item 8X 599 application assistance to operators in Western County. Service changes for FY 2018/19 include the following: • Split Routes 22 and 27 each into two separate routes to improve reliability and connectivity in Perris; • Improve Route 24 weekday service frequency from 80 to 60 minutes; • Extend Route 31 last weekday evening departure one hour later from Moreno Valley to Beaumont and Hemet; and • Expand Route 40 to provide more service in the city of Menifee, including Mount San Jacinto College Menifee campus, Heritage Lakes area and McCall Boulevard east of the Interstate 215. SunLine Transit Agency SunLine is the CTSA for the Coachella Valley and is responsible for coordinating transit services in the valley, which covers a service area of approximately 1,120 square miles. SunLine provides both local and regional transportation services with 15 fixed routes and demand response services known as SunDial. Planned services for FY 2018/19 include: • Continue work with the jurisdictions to improve bus stops within the service area using Proposition 1B Safety and Security funds; • Purchase three replacement CNG fixed route buses and four support vehicles; • Continue planned improvements to SunLine's operations facility; and • Conduct a planning study to determine transit needs in Coachella Valley. Commission's Rail Program Western County Commuter Rail The Southern California Regional Rail Authority operates seven commuter rail lines with 56 locomotives and 258 passenger rail cars. Three routes - the Riverside to Los Angeles Line, the Inland Empire to Orange County Line (IEOC), and the 91/Perris Valley Line (91/PV) - directly serve Western Riverside County with connecting service available to destinations on the other four Metrolink lines. Planned services for FY 2018/19 include: • Continue operations and target marketing of the Perris Valley Line Metrolink service extension; • Continue support of special trains including Festival of Lights, Angels Express and Rams Trains; • Continue Next Generation Rail and Transit Study; and • Continue support of positive train control cost increase as well as contractual step increase with major Metrolink service vendors. Agenda Item 8X 600 Coachella Valley — San Gorgonio Pass Rail Corridor Service The proposed 200-mile long rail corridor service in Coachella Valley will run from Los Angeles to Indio through the four Southern California counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino to provide a convenient scheduled link to the communities in the fast-growing Coachella Valley and Banning Pass areas. Financial support will come primarily from federal and state grant funds that are deposited and maintained in the Coachella Valley Rail Fund. Phase 1 of the project is completed and work is continuing on Phase 2 of the Federal Railroad Administration process. Planning efforts for FY 2018/19 include: • Continue efforts on Service Development Plan; and • Continue efforts on Environmental Impact Documentation. Attachments: FYs 2018/19 — 2020/21 Operator SRTPs (Posted on the Commission Website) 1) City of Banning 2) City of Beaumont 3) City of Corona 4) City of Riverside 5) PVVTA 6) RTA 7) SunLine 8) Western Riverside Rail Program 9) Coachella Valley Rail Program Agenda Item 8X 601 FINAL DRAFT PASSTRANSIT Short Range Transit Plan FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 System Overview 1.1 Description of service area and system map 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections 1.3 Existing Service and Route Performance 1.4 Current and Proposed Fare Structure 1.5 Revenue Fleet 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities 1.7 Existing Coordination between Transit Agencies 2 Existing Services and Route Performance 2.1 Fixed Route Services 2.2 Dial -a -Ride Service 2.3 Key Performance Indicators 2.4 Productivity Improvement Efforts 2.5 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth 2.6 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs 3 Planned Service Changes and Implementation 3.1 Recent Service Changes 3.2 Recommended Local & Express Routes 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotions 3.4 Budget Impact on Proposed Changes 4 Financial and Capital Plans 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget Narrative 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Operating and Capital Program 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements • ADA, DBE, EEO, Title VI • TDA Triennial Audit, FTA Triennial Audit, NTD • Alternative Fueled Vehicles 3 4 6 6 7 7 8 9 12 13 14 14 15 15 17 17 18 19 19 19 Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California 5 Tables 1. Table 1 - Fleet Inventory a. Motor Bus (DO/PT) b. Demand Response (DO/PT) 2. Table 2 - SRTP Service Summary a. All Routes b. Non -Excluded Routes C. Excluded Routes d. Fixed Route e. DAR 3. Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Table 3A - Individual Route 4. Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2018/19 Table 4A - Capital Project Justification 5. Table 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2019/20 Table 5.1A - Capital Project Justification Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested in FY 2020/21 Table 5.2A - Capital Project Justification 6. FY 2012 - 2015 TDA Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations 7. Table 7 - Performance Target Report 2017/18 8. Table 8 - Performance Report 2018/19 9. Table 9A - Highlights of FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan Table 9B - Fare Revenue Calculation Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California 1 System Overview 1.1 - Description of Service Area The Banning Transit system serves several areas, including the commercial and residential areas of Banning and Cabazon, as well as the commercial areas of the Morongo Indian Reservation and limited commercial areas of Beaumont. The cities of Banning and Beaumont operate under a shared brand identity, "Pass Transit." Pass Transit offers seamless transit by coordinating transportation services that cover approximately 40 square miles in the pass area with routes connecting to regional services. Within the service area, population is mixed with areas of both high and low densities. The current routes have been planned by taking advantage of this knowledge, allowing the system to operate more efficiently. Service Area Map Legend I Map not to scale Transfer Point I Shod 1 10 11 ndan ���C71 Banning Banning � ■ L4 iB 2 3 4 n ddlknn a n RT.{-ssdirF 120 110 Nimlet L >a m = Desert kiffs BFALriIow a � Dudd Mad Mureangoj� n� Ra t zy i� 1-10 a o r l� Y1U E 0 2ndSt m m P r �{ain 6 e5Nldrd c' c We: 1 4- iy1 Wejey Maonoia CarnEn 3 c �f}aI01r c Bannine famawurrity IA 1B H, 11 caffte a,h,G; Bannin_ LA 16 011 BeaunoM 2 1 4 7 3 1D RTA 21 RTA 31 zn Route 1A & E nlirF Z2{ Route 1;B i Route 11 � �1-10 Boma m E U Ma�one E J Esper ma Short Range Transit Plan Cliy of BANNING California 1.2 — Population Profile and Area Demographics Riverside County covers 7,208 square miles with a population of over 2.2 million people in 2010, per the U.S. Census. The population density for Riverside County is 303.8 people per square mile, largely due to the vast desert areas that are not populated. The city of Banning covers 23 square miles with a population of 30,241 people in 2014, per the U.S. Census. The population density for Banning is 1,300 per square mile. The population of the service area covered by Banning Transit has grown by approximately 29% over the last ten years. The median household income in Banning is reported at $38,919, with 19.4% of the residents living below the federal poverty line. The six The racial makeup of the city is as follows: Population Ethnicity 2.2 1es add to more than 100 percent because individuals The average age of the population is the following: • 65 or older 25.9 % • 45-64 Years 21.6 % • 25-44 Years 20.4 % • 18-24 Years 9.2 % • Under 18 Years 22.9 % The median age of the population is 42.3 years old. ■ Hispanic/Latino ■ White/Caucasian M African American ■ Asian ■ American Indian Other more than one race Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California Rider Demographics In 2013, a survey was conducted showing the demographics of the Pass Transit riders. The information gathered helped create a visual indication of the use of the system. The racial makeup of the ridership is as follows: Rider Ethnicity 2%° F 1.00% 4% 12% White/Caucasian 47% Hispanic r African American ■ Other 34% ■ Native American ■ Asian Furthermore, 86% of respondents stated that they used the system's fixed routes at least three times a week. 59% of the ridership used the bus service for local trips within the Bann ing/Beaumont/Cabazon area, and 49% use the transit to travel outside of Pass Transit's service area. For 91 % of ridership, the bus system is their only means of transportation. An unspecified amount of respondents stated that the transit service is readily available in their area, with a majority of riders living within a two -block radius of a bus stop. A majority of the users of the system share the commonality of being either underemployed or unemployed, with 88% of riders reporting an annual household income of $20,000 or less and 81 % of respondents reporting a family of two or more. 87% of those completing the survey report English as their primary language while 13% speak Spanish. Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California 1.3 - Existing Service and Route Performance The Banning Transit System currently has three fixed route services which serve the main streets and neighborhood areas of Banning, the residential and business areas of Cabazon, and the main business and shopping area of Beaumont. Banning's fixed route buses are accessible to people with disabilities; each bus has a wheelchair lift or ramp along with two wheelchair securement locations. Banning offers individualized travel training to assist new passengers in learning how to ride these buses. Banning Paratransit is an origin -to -destination shared ride transportation service for seniors age 60 and older and persons who are, due to their functional limitation(s), unable to use accessible fixed route bus service. Passengers must be certified eligible per guidelines established by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 1.4 - Current and Proposed Fare Structure The Pass Transit system has adopted a mutual service fare to make traveling more accessible to those who utilize the system. The chart below has a detailed breakdown of the current fares for available services: Fixed Route Fare Categories Base Day 10-Trip 10-Ticket Monthly Fare Pass Punch Book Pass Pass General Youth (grades K-12) Senior (60+) Disabled Military Veterans Child (46" tall or under. Must be accompanied by full fare paying passenger.) Zone Fare (Cabazon Residential Area) Deviations (Routes 3 & 4) Active Military GOPass (During school session only) $1.15 $3.00 N/A $10.35 $36.00 $1.00 $3.00 $10.00 N/A $10.00 $.65 $1.80 N/A $5.85 $21.50 $.65 $1.80 N/A $5.85 $21.50 $.65 $1.80 N/A $5.85 $21.50 $.25 N/A N/A N/A N/A $.25 $.25 $.25 $.25 N/A $.25 $.25 $.25 $.25 $.25 FREE N/A N/A N/A N/A FREE N/A N/A N/A N/A Short Range Transit Plan CitV of BANNING California Dial -A -Ride Fares Fare Categories Base Fare 10-Ride Punch Card One -Way $2.00 $18.00 Companion $3.00 N/A PCA (w/ I.D.)* FREE FREE No Show $2.00 N/A *Personal Care Attendant must show proper ID each time they board. 1.5 — Revenue Fleet Banning Transit System operates seven fixed route vehicles all of which are powered by compressed natural gas (CNG). The vehicles are equipped with racks for two bicycles and are in compliance with the ADA with mobility device lifts and two tie -down stations per bus. The transit system also has four vehicles that are classified as Dial -A -Ride (two in revenue service and one as a spare). The one remaining is utilized as an alternate for the fixed - route if needed. All are in compliance with the ADA, with mobility device lifts and tie -down stations for four mobility devices. Banning Pass Transit also has four support vehicles which are used for driver relief or administrative errands. The most recent additions to the fleet are two 32' El Dorado National EZ Rider II buses, with the most recent being delivered January of 2018. See the City of Banning Fleet Inventory Table 1 for individual vehicle characteristics. 1.6 — Existing Facility/Planned Facilities Banning Transit System functions as a department within the City and utilizes existing facilities. Transit Administrative staff is housed at the City's Community Center located at 789 North San Gorgonio Avenue, where bus passes are sold, schedules are available and all ADA applications are processed. Dispatch and general telephone information is also provided at the transit office within the Community Center. Short Range Transit Plan BANNING California Bannina Pass Transit Office Hours Monday — Thursday: 7:30am to 6:OOpm Friday: 8:OOam to 5:00 pm The maintenance, parking, fueling of the buses, and storage of bus stop amenities are performed at the City's Corporation Yard located at 176 East Lincoln Street. Maintenance of the vehicles is performed by the Public Works Department, Fleet Maintenance Division. There are currently no plans to expand Banning Pass Transit System facilities. Meanwhile, there are plans to improve the CNG fueling station during the upcoming year. 1.7 — Existing Coordination between Transit Agencies The cities of Banning and Beaumont have operated under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) which allows for each respective agency to cross jurisdictional boundary lines, allowing simplified travel for passengers throughout the Pass area, however this MOU will be ending and replaced with one that is equally beneficial to each respective agency. In addition, an MOU is held with the Morongo Band of Mission Indians allowing stops on their property. The ability to provide a stop at Casino Morongo allows passengers to make connections with Sunline Commuter Link 220, providing service from Palm Desert to Riverside. Also, services are also coordinated with Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) by providing timed stops that meet with routes that provide travel to and from the areas of Hemet and Moreno Valley (i.e. Route 31 at either Sun Lakes or Walmart). Riders also have the opportunity to connect with the Amtrak Thruway Bus Service at Casino Morongo. 2 Existing Service and Route Performance 2.1 — Fixed Route Service The Banning Transit System currently has three fixed route services which serve downtown and neighborhood areas of Banning, both the residential and business areas of Cabazon, and the main commercial area of Beaumont. The main service arterial is Ramsey, which is served by Beaumont's route 2 and Banning's route1; splitting frequency, ridership and fare revenues. As noted in prior years SRTP's the level of service through Ramsey continues to be detrimentally impacting Banning's fare box recovery and changes to existing service will begin in July 2018 to correct what has been an ongoing problem. Short Range Transit Plan Cliy of BANNING California Route 1A & Route 1B — Beaumont/Banning/Cabazon Pass Transit Route 1 is among the most used route in the system, operating primarily along Ramsey Street and 6th Street and serving the commercial areas of Cabazon and Casino Morongo. Ridership on Route 1 accounts for approximately 60% of the total use of the system. While the longest in distance, this route operates on one -hour headway from Beaumont to Casino Morongo. The major stops on this line include Albertsons, Wal-Mart, Banning City Hall, Mid -County Justice Center, San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Casino Morongo and the Desert Hills Outlets in Cabazon. IPASST� 11 NSIT Time andiorTransfer Point - - - - - - - - - --,�-'1VF�l■ ® Connection Point N BEALWONT �-7�'' Pti41Z4G CARAZON m Ao- 2es 1'� 11 V__r !fills drrir'et Mamnga Wiban 5t Ramsey it sem R 1-10 f-1D t-io 6 41 N P 9 N �dln o Ranh. N Lst St P_ Magnole C-3 trf �S E fa&w x v 2 3 4 9 14 Ccrre :'r, fommuniiy Connect ioM1 1'7 11 31 Mawne m fLou[z; .bres 11 31 12: 21 22: Esperane J The second loop of Route 1 also runs on an hour headway departing from Casino Morongo and servicing the Cabazon Community Center and the residential areas of Cabazon. Two buses are operated on this route which allows for hourly service to the two respective areas. Short Range Transit Plan CitV of BANNING California Route 5 — Northern Banning Route 5 accounts for 25 percent of Pass Transit use, providing service to the areas that lie north of the 1-10 Freeway in the City of Banning. Major stops on this route are the Mid - County Justice Center, Banning City Hall, the Banning Community Center, Library, Medical Facilities, San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital and the commercial area of Beaumont. Banning staff has evaluated how best to serve the northerly and southerly markets and will be changing this route to a clockwise pattern that will cover both the north and south sides of Banning. The information for the new service can be found in Section 3, Planned Service Changes and Implementation. PASSTRANSIT $EA UMONT n--b z t Routes 4 5 Srn St N Wilson St a) x 6 Ern St LO u a � cn u }t 2nd St Zst St 3 1 4 1 S 6 9 Connt'on Connection to Routs to Routes I .,.,I 21Dt I -- -- Legend I Map not to scale N Indian School Lane o N 10 10 BAN'DUI m 6 `m oyi a = Wilson St A¢' ■ Nicolet St .o Nicolet St rn Ramsey St 1b L� cO c m cn Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California Route 6 — Southern Banning Accounting for 15% of Pass Transit use, Route 6 provides service to the southern area of Banning. Major stops on this route are the Mid -County Justice Center, Banning City Hall, the Mt. San Jacinto Pass Campus, Banning High School, Smith Correctional Facility, Medical Facilities, San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital and the commercial area of Beaumont. Banning staff has evaluated how best to serve the northerly and southerly markets and will be changing this route to a clockwise pattern that will cover both the north and south sides of Banning. The information for the new service can be found in Section 3, Planned Service Changes and Implementation. PA S S T RA N S I T Connedian Paint BFAUM01►T B.'izvlvnvri 777 V U' i3th St Wilson St a Williams St 3 G] y 7 x rn fi St - Ramsey St ° _ i rn o n m 2nd St Lincoln St C0 `° E �W¢ ° ist St m rn CM m m - cn Westward Ave "' m @arxnng Wesley St �unnec[ian M57C Ing S S _ 5 31 35 Pass Gonns�tian to Routzs .,,, 2��,1 ,. tp Rout- Campus Short Range Transit Plan Ci tv of BANNING California Banning Pass Transit fixed route service hours are as follows: Days Route Hours Monday — Friday Route 1 4:30 A.M. — 10:45 P.M. Monday- Friday Route 5 5:30 A.M. — 6:30 P.M. Monday- Friday Route 6 6:00 A.M. — 6:00 P.M. Saturday & Sunday Route 1 8:00 A.M. — 6:00 P.M. Saturday & Sunday Routes 5 & 6 8:00 A.M. — 5:00 P.M. Banning Pass Transit offers limited service hours, 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., on the following holidays: Martin Luther King Day, President's Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, and the day after Thanksgiving. Banning Pass Transit offers no service on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. All aforementioned fixed routes are consistently monitored and will be modified as needed to better serve unmet transit needs. 2.2 — Dial -A -Ride Service Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride is a service offered to seniors, aged 60 and older, persons with disabilities and passengers eligible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Limited service hours are available for non-ADA passengers. This category of passenger is also required to fill out a certification application to determine eligibility. If these terms are met, the applicant will receive a card certifying their eligibility to ride. Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride is a service offered within the city limits of Banning and Beaumont as well as within a 3/4 mile boundary of Routes 1 and 2 service areas (including Cabazon). The primary uses for the Dial -A -Ride system are transportation to medical appointments, workshop programs for persons with disabilities, shopping areas, and employment. Dial -a - Ride services also provide connections to the Riverside Transit Agency and Pass Transit Fixed Routes. Additionally, demand for paratransit is expected to grow. This is a universal transit/paratransit theme nationwide and Banning is anticipated to continue to see growth in the paratransit program. Furthermore, demand for Saturday and Sunday paratransit is expected to grow from somewhat inconsequential from a budget / demand standpoint to significant in the coming fiscal years. Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California Hours for the Dial -A -Ride program are as follows: Days Seniors (age 60 & older) & Persons without ADA Certification Monday - Friday Saturday & Sunday Persons with ADA Certification Monday - Friday Saturday & Sunday 2.3 — Key Performance Indicators Hours 8:00 A.M. — 3:00 P.M. No Service 7:00 A.M. — 7:00 P.M. Limited service when three or more persons request service. The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) has adopted a Productivity Improvement Plan (PIP) for the transit and commuter rail operators of Riverside County. The PIP sets forth efficiency and effectiveness standards that the transit operators are to meet. Progress towards these standards is reported quarterly to the Commission. The following table on the next page shows the operating performance indicators adopted in the PIP and this plan's projections for the coming year. Banning Transit System / Pass Transit Performance Statistics FY 2016 Audited FY 2017 Actual FY 2018 Projected (Based on 3'd Quarter Actuals) FY 2019 Planned Unlinked Passenger Trips 137,594 133,185 129,826 197,950 Operating Cost per Revenue $56.03 $71.13 $55.50 $57.79 Hours Farebox Recovery Ratio 13.05% 10.66% 10.11 % 12.13% I Subsidy per Passenger $7.28 $8.35 $8.35 $7.34 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $2.84 $3.25 $3.25 $1.29 Subsidy per Revenue Hour $48.72 $49.89 $49.89 $50.78 Subsidy per Revenue Mile $1.31 $1.37 $1.37 $1.75 I Passengers per Revenue Mile 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.24 I Short Range Transit Plan D ILy of BANNING California Projections are based on operating data through March 2018 and projected through June, 2018. Since these are only estimates, the performance indicators are subject to change. For Fiscal Year 2018/2019, the Banning Transit System expects to be in compliance with at least 4 of the 7 performance targets. Additional details on key indicators for demand responsive and fixed route services are shown in Table 2. The Banning Transit System does not receive any federal funding and is not required to report to the National Transit Database. 2.4 — Productivity Improvement Efforts In order to meet performance standards, routes are continually monitored and analyzed to insure that the service being provided runs as efficiently as possible. Banning Pass Transit completed a Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) with Transportation Management & Design, Inc. in May of 2014, resulting in route changes for the entire system. Ultimately, to most effectively serve the Cabazon community it has been determined that including that segment of Route 1 is most prudent. With hourly frequency, Route 1 is able to service those residents more directly and sustain a better farebox recovery due to the Ramsey corridor. The COA is not being currently being used for service design and is not the basis for current or future service planning adjustments in Banning. Banning Pass Transit has continued to experience a significant decrease in farebox revenue with the additional service of the Beaumont Route 2. While the additional bus allows for 30 minute service from Walmart in Beaumont to Casino Morongo, the growth in ridership that was projected for the route has not been realized. Thus, Banning had requested that beginning January 1, 2017 Beaumont reduce their trips through Banning by 50%. This did not occur and loss of fare revenue down the service arterial Ramsey continues to detrimentally impact farebox recovery and the Banning Transit Budget, along with oversaturating this corridor with disproportionately high frequency. As a result, the City of Banning will be terminating the 2002 agreement and no longer share service areas with the City of Beaumont. 2.5 — Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth over the next two years Major passenger trip destinations that the Banning Pass Transit services are the Sunlakes Plaza Shopping Center, the 2nd Street Marketplace in Beaumont, the Walmart Supercenter in Beaumont, the Banning Justice Center, San Gorgonio Pass Hospital, Beaver and Loma Linda Medical Plazas, the Cabazon Outlet Stores, Desert Hills Premium Outlets and Casino Morongo, Smith Correctional Facility and the Mt. San Jacinto College Pass Campus. There is a high demand for service to these destinations whether for employment, necessities, or Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California pleasure. Looking into FY 2019, Banning may look to request funding for reverse commute service that connects the Pass area with the desert communities and Sunline. Staff will explore routing, service planning and the budget for service during FY 2019. Additionally, demand for paratransit is expected to grow. This is a universal transit/paratransit theme nationwide and Banning is anticipated to continue to see growth in the paratransit program. 2.6 — Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs It is the City of Banning's goal to acquire, upgrade, and maintain equipment with the federal Transit Asset Management (TAMs) Business Model in mind to manage the nexus between State of Good Repair (SGR) and Safety Management System (SMS). All fixed route and Dial -A -Ride vehicles are equipped with security cameras and recording equipment. Two new fixed route buses were placed into service July, 2015. Grant funds have been received for two additional 32' passenger coaches, one of which was delivered in September 2016 and another in December 2017. The standardization and enhancement for both fleet and facility security cameras has also been budgeted and will be implemented in Fiscal Year 2018. One staff vehicle was ordered and delivered in Fiscal Year 2018. This year funds are being requested for the replacement of a hydraulic lift at the fleet maintenance shop and for improvement to the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) fueling station. The former is being supplemented by FY 2017 funds, while the latter merges several 08/09 funding streams into a consolidated project along with additional FY 2018 STA capital funds. This project will be implemented in FY 18 and is estimated to be completed early in FY 2019. It will be a perennial SRTP request to ensure State of the Industry technology is maintained and State of Good Repair is achieved. 3 Planned Service Changes and Implementation 3.1 — Recent Service Changes The COA had called for a Cabazon Circulator route that would connect residents in that community to Morongo Casino, and thereby, the entire Pass Transit System. Operationally, such a circulator route is not feasible and leads to one additional vehicle (along with corresponding hours and miles) to serve no more than the same number of passengers best case scenario due to it also forcing a transfer. Therefore Banning operates two vehicles on route 1 resulting in hourly frequency, and for passengers on the Ramsey corridor, de facto 30 minute headways with Beaumont continuing status -quo with their Route 2. This has diffused ridership and continues to impede adequate farebox recovery for the Banning system, and as a result the City of Banning will be terminating the current agreement with the City of Beaumont and no longer share the Ramsey Street Corridor with Beaumont Pass Transit. Banning will continue to operate Route 1 on its current hourly schedule. Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California This reduction has been determined to be necessary due to oversaturation of service in Banning's service area. While service has been increased over the past two years, Banning Pass Ridership and farebox revenue have both declined. Major growth projected for the downtown area which will generate a significant increase in ridership has not yet occurred (i.e. County Courthouse being fully operational, retail and office space being built and a substantial amount of county offices relocating to the area). A new Memorandum of Understanding will be developed and will address transfer points, financial equity relative to monthly passes and other items as deemed necessary each respective agency. Routes 5 and 6, which are operated as circular loops that cover the northern and southern areas of town are being eliminated and will be replaced with Routes 10 and 11. Routes 10 and 11 will operate independently in a clockwise and counter clockwise pattern, having a 70-75 minute headway, with a combined 35-40 minute frequency for passengers. This will provide service that is more effective and efficient than the current alignment. Staff will outreach and market to the community to ensure awareness of the changes that are being made. AglldftAit�, PASSTRANSIT Connection 1 2 m Rnm: 4 11 y a x m a C7 u E4�,t L 1 2 11 31 �nRw[� 1 11 Legend I Map not to scale N RvV.'VrVG cn 0 c m m ...................... . a Ullilsao St - d Gevrsls~ m Ramsey St N W1W • c Ramsey St N CO .,..Lincoln 5t. .............. C u7 2 Westward Ave. westward wesley St Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California PASSTRANSIT BEACafox-r Connecri�n m iiwo� x � m ............. o,..:.... d � � 2nd 5t !J Ist st Co—n jon m C­ . m N BBWMW ............................;. Ramsey& 4W i ........ ?.................... Lincoln St : Indian Sdioal Lane u� 0 m a ..........l4VP=5t.,0 W i lha— st Cr , ...►...................... L� r Westward Ave, Westvuard Ave 3.2 — Recommend Local and Express Routes G Ramsey5t u� 0 LO a 2 Wesley St Banning is exploring the possibility of requesting funding for a reverse commuter and desert link route in fiscal year 2020. In the coming fiscal year 2019, staff will review estimated demand, service planning, and budgeting for this route. At this point, it is hypothetical pending due diligence research and review, but could mature into a service recommendation and request depending on the outcome of the analysis. 3.3 — Marketing Plans and Promotions Efforts have continued to be made to market the Pass Transit System over the past year and will continue in the coming year. These efforts include purchasing advertising on a map of the San Gorgonio Pass Area, distribution of route maps by delivery to the library, Chamber of Commerce, San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, Mt. San Jacinto Pass Campus, local hotels and other businesses. Short Range Transit Plan Ci tv of BANNING California The following marketing efforts will be undertaken to promote ridership growth: 1. Continue outreach programs to schools and at community events. 2. Attend senior community meetings to provide information. 3. Participation in the MSJC GO -PASS Program to encourage ridership of college students. Work with campus staff to maximize awareness of Banning Pass Transit. 4. Articles in local papers highlighting new transportation routes. 5. Incorporate and coordinate travel training opportunities for Pass Passengers with regional providers including Sunline, RTA and Beaumont. 6. Offer "Rider Appreciation Day" to raise awareness of benefits of public transportation. 7. Continue to participate with Transportation Now, Senior Transportation Assistance Group, Pass Area Senior Connections, Pass Area Veterans Assistance, Cabazon Community Resources and other efforts. The City of Banning's website at www.ci.banning.ca.us provides basic Pass Transit route and schedule information, as well as links to route information for neighboring agencies. Customers can submit comments, complaints, concerns and suggestions through the city website. Banning Pass Transit strives to operate service in a manner that will maximize system productivity, efficiency, as well as the use of subsidies. • Develop an ongoing planning process with key agencies and organizations within the region. • Ensure that services are operated in a manner to maximize safety, to the riders, the public and the operators. • Develop a core group of services that connect key activity points and commit to providing service along those corridors. • Continually review all services to evaluate the efficiency and needs of the transit system. 3.4 — Budget Impact on Proposed Changes Banning transit farebox recovery and budget have been detrimentally impacted by Beaumont's continued operation of Route 2 that serves the primary arterial of Ramsey Street. With a plan in place to have Beaumont discontinue said service beginning August 2018, and the realignment of routes 5 and 6, it is anticipated that farebox recovery will Short Range Transit Plan BANNING California improve significantly and the transit budget will be balanced. Banning will be using Low Carbon Operations Program (LCTOP) funds to eliminate a zone fare that is charged to passengers traveling into Cabazon. 4 FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 4.1 — Operating and Capital Budget For FY 18/19, operating funds needed to operate the Banning Pass Transit System are $1,878,500 for the Fixed Route and DAR. The operating funds consist of $ 1,653,957 local transportation funds (LTF) and $35,443 in Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funds. The projected farebox revenue for FY 18/19 is $188,000. Additional funding in the amount of $1,100 will come from interest income. Staff will continue to complete previously funded Capital projects in FY 18/19 and will continue to operate service in a manner that will maximize system productivity and efficiency. As previously reviewed, this year funds are being requested for the replacement of a hydraulic lift at the fleet maintenance shop and improvements to the existing CNG fueling station. The former is being supplemented by FY 2017 funds, while the latter merges several 08/09 funding streams into a consolidated project along with additional FY 2018/19 STA capital funds. 4.2 — Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program Capital projects are funded through STA funds, Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account Program and Proposition 1 B Security grants for Banning Pass Transit. Operating costs will be fully funded through LTF funds, LCTOP, farebox revenue and interest. 4.3 — Regulatory and Compliance Requirements The City of Banning submitted an Americans with Disabilities Act Paratransit Plan to the FTA on January 26, 1992. Pass Transit fixed route buses are equipped with ADA compliant mobility device lifts and are accessible to persons with disabilities. A procedure is in place to provide service to a customer in a mobility device should a fixed route bus lift fail. Banning Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride services provide ADA complementary paratransit service for the fixed route services operated by Banning Transit System. Beaumont Transit System offers the same service through its Pass Transit Dial -a -Ride operation. The system uses a Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California self -certification process with professional verification. Banning Transit System staff processes ADA certifications for Pass Transit operations. Title VI Banning Transit System/Pass Transit does not utilize federal funds for operating expenses. As such, Title VI requirements do not currently apply to the transit system. Alternativelv Fueled Vehicles (RCTC Policv) Pass Transit fixed -route buses are CNG powered. Pass Transit Dial -A -Ride vehicles (which are less than 33,000 lbs. GVW and 15-passenger capacity), administrative and driver relief vehicles are gasoline -powered. Future vehicle purchases will be in compliance with the RCTC and South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) policies regarding alternative fuel transit vehicles. The CNG Fueling Station at the City of Banning Corporation Yard provides expanded CNG capacity and fast fueling capability. With increased capacity and redundant compressor units, having adequate and reliable CNG pumping capacity will not be an issue in the foreseeable future. Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California SECTION 5 SRTP TABLES Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FY 2018119 Short Range Transit Plan City of Banning Imi I. �.G� m Bus (Motorbus) / Directly Operated Average Lifetime # of Life to Date Miles Per Active Active # of Life to Date Vehicle Miles Vehicle As Of Lift and Fuel Vehicless contingency Vehicle Miles through Year -To -Date Year Mfg. Model Seating Ramp Vehicle Type FY Vehicles Prior Year End March (e.g- March) Built Code Code Capacity Equipped LerKjth Code 2017/18 FY 2017118 FY 2016117 FY 2017118 FY 2017118 2015 EDN AeroUte 30 2 32 CN 2 ❑ 127,481 153,151 76,575 2017 EDN Easy Rider 25 1 32 CN 1 ❑ 19,804 19,804 2016 EDN EZ Rider 25 1 32 CN 1 ❑ 21,256 62,228 62,228 2004 EDN Transmark 33 2 35 CN 2 ❑ 909,001 945,458 472,729 2010 EDN XHF 31 1 34 CN 1 ❑ 586,181 616,135 616,135 Totals: 144 7 7 0 1,643,919 1,796,776 256,682 Demand Response / Directly Operated Average Lifetime # of Life to Date Miles Per Active Active # of Life to Date Vehicle Miles Vehicle As Of Lift and Fuel Vehicles Contingency Vehicle Miles through Year -To -Date Year Mfg. Model Seating Ramp Vehicle Type FY Vehicles Prior Year End March (e.g., March) Built Code Cade Capacity Equipped Length Code 2017/18 FY 2017/18 FY 2016/17 FY 2017113 FY 2017/18 2010 EBC Aerotech 16 1 25 GA 1 0 97,736 109,486 109,486 2010 EBC EDN 16 1 25 GA 1 ❑ 102,026 102,026 102,026 2003 EDN Aerotech 12 1 25 GA 1 0 318,251 330,402 330,402 2013 GLV Universal 18 1 26 CN 1 ❑ 46,144 58,036 58,036 2008 777 Ford 14 1 26 GA 1 0 194,536 230,293 230,293 Totals: 76 5 5 0 758,693 830,243 166,049 Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California IM4, C-,, I:®pmim fumrisui Table 2 --City of Banning -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018119 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2015116 FY 2016117 Fr 2017118 FY 2017118 FY 2019119 Audited Audited Plan 3rd ,W Actual Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 5 6 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $1,151,971 $1,473,649 $1,850,000 $904,829 $1,653,957 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $150,360 $157,157 $1B7,500 $91,487 $188,000 Met Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $1,001,611 $1,316,492 $1,662,500 $313,342 $1,465,957 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 137,594 133,185 199,540 97,370 193,950 Passenger Miles 352,512 342,529 113,703 250,436 1,222,444 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 20,558.9 20,717.2 24,852.0 16,302.3 28,618.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 767,543.3 776,997.0 839,213.0 592,232.5 837,700.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 776,697.5 785,685.0 848,543.0 599,321.1 850,368.0 Performance Characteristics 3 pei sting Cost per Revenue Hour $56.03 $71.13 $74.44 $55.50 $57.79 Ew,;h" Recovery Ratio 1305% 10.66% 1C.13% 10.11% 11.36% Subsidy per Passenger $7.28 $938 $8.33 $8.35 $7.56 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $2.84 $3.84 $4.02 $3.25 $1.20 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $48.72 $63.55 $66.90 $49.89 $51.22 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $1.31 $1.69 $1.98 $1.37 $1.75 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 6.7 6.4 8.0 6.0 6.8 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.18 0.17 0.24 0.16 0.23 tat Irain Hours ror Han Mocies. 1ti2 Car mmI rur Han Mooes. �(w a.�de[mrsmn�,mm� Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics City of Banning -- 1 FY 2018119 All Routes Data semwlts peek Prsanger Rovenw TOW Revenue Toll 9prsting Pmenper Net R.A.9 nay Type Vehldee ftu-9n Nil. Noun Mnun Mlles Mlles Ctet R-. SAMdy BAN I All Days 2 143,06E 786,SM 18,390.0 18,600.0 696,664.0 672,584.E $1,107,7n $143,00E $964,719 Bail ID All Days 1 21,200 144,10E 4,182.E 4,260.E 65,650.E 69,140.E $143,119 $17,34E $125,fl9 Bail 11 All Days 1 21,20E 144,10E 4,182.E 4,650.E 65,650.E 68,422.E $143,119 $17,34E $125,779 AN DAR wukeav 2 12,55E 48,744 1,864.E 3,599.E 32,210A 34,685.11 WIN S23,om $236,960 5-1. Bravlder lot is t 197,95E 1,123,444 28,h La.6 11,1099 830,174.0 644,831.0 $1,653,M7 $200,720 $1,453,237 Route 4 Day Type Operating Coo Per Revenue Hdur Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile Cog per 1,12- r farehml Recovery Ratio Subsidy Per Passenger Suilsidy Per Vaasedger Mile Subsidy Per Revenue Hour 56sldy Per Revenue Mile Pd55Cllglr3 Per Hour Pa-r9ar5 Per Mil, 1w:: Ni Days $60,8 Ei,66 $7,11 12.904E --- $6.75 $1.23 $52,46 61 7.8 9,21 eanlo- 4Dll s $3422 $2.18 $(LIS i2.11% $S.9s $U7 $88.08 $1,92 5.1 032 8W41 ANDags $3422 $2.18 $6.1S 12.11% jss9 $0.87 pa $192 5.1 032 WAR Weekday $13948 $8.07 $2071 &VA $1888 61.3G $121.12 $736 6.7 039 Service ProvinerTotals $5779 $1.99 $" 12.13% $734 $139 $50.n $175 D 024 Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California TABLE 3A — Individual Route Statistics Fixed Rout Walmart Shopping Center, Albertsons, San Route 1 Service from Beaumont Gorgonio Memorial Hospital, medical to Cabazon via downtown facilities, shopping areas, and restaurants at Banning Highland Springs Downtown Banning, Banning Justice Center, Casino Morongo, Desert Hills Outlet, Cabazon Community Center and residential areas of Cabazon Banning City Hall, Fox Cineplex, Banning Route 10 Residential areas of Northern Library, Banning Community Center, Mid - and Southern Banning to county Justice Center, Post Office, San Walmart Shopping Gorgonio Hospital, Mt. San Jacinto College Pass Campus, Banning High School, Smith Correctional Facility; medical facilities, shopping areas, and restaurants at Highland Springs Banning City Hall, Fox Cineplex, Banning Route 11 Residential areas of Southern Library, Banning Community Center, Mid - and Northern Banning to county Justice Center, Post Office, San Walmart Shopping Gorgonio Hospital, Mt. San Jacinto College Pass Campus, Banning High School, Smith Correctional Facility; medical facilities, shopping areas, and restaurants at Highland Springs City -Wide Demand All areas of Banning and limited areas response/reservation in Beaumont based service for seniors and disabled Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2018119 City of Banning Capital Project Total Amount Prop I Project Description Number(1) of Funds LTF ST.A SGR Security LCTOP Fare Box Other«' FY18119Operating Assistance $1.878.500 $1.653.957 $35,443 $108.000 $1.100 Subtotal: Operating $1,878,500 $1,653,957 $0 $0 $0 $35,443 $188,000 $1,100 CNG Facility 19-01 $400.000 $400.000 AAA Paratransit ldini�Bus Replacement 19-02 $75.000 $75.000 State of Good Repair (FY 17113) 19-03 $38,307 Subtotal: capital $513,307 $0 $475.000 $0 $0 $o $o $o Total: Operating & Capital $2,353,500 $1,651,957 $475,000 $0 $0 $35,"3 $188,000 $1,100 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing protect in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID number) SRTP Project No 19-01: PROJECT NAME: CNG Facility FTIP No: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (For Bus Purchase projects, indicate fuel type) This request for $400,000 will be combined with $308,058 of existing reprogrammed capital funds and will be used to construct a new CNG Facility. An engineering assessment of the facility resulted in a recommendation to replace all components of the facility due to age and condition and the fact that several components (i.e. compressor control system and dispensers) of the existing system are obsolete and replacement parts have become increasingly difficult to procure. The CNG Facility is used both by the City and the Banning Unified School District and the school district will be sharing in the cost of total cost of the project. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Given the condition of the existing CNG facility, constructing a new facility is necessary to ensure reliable, and cost-efficient service is provided. If the facility were to become non -operational, the City's transit vehicles would have to travel to either Hemet, Moreno Valley, Redlands or Palm Springs to fuel. Short Range Transit Plan BANNING California PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): STA Funds $400,000 PROJECT SCHEDULE (if existing protect in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date : RFP July 2018 BID AWARD September 2018 CONSTRUCTION October 2018 — February 2019 COMPLETION March 2019 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): STA Funds $400,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP 10 ## RCTCISRTP Description Unexpended Project ## balance (as of 6130117) yC-08 Schedule Holders) �:-N.C. CNG Fgalityr 00 GPS System.' 2E.C.C.0 CNG Fgcility+ 2-10 Paretraisit Sched.rliig 2E.C.C.0 Softv.arerCNG Facility y2 11 Computer EcumrnsrV �3,246 bo CNG Fgcilityr 2-13 Seci,ity Cameras on 43.254 50 B6ses.+CNG=aciIty yC-16 A6tonnated Enr.rc ator & 9H.28 D splayrCNG Fad its 1 F-01 Hycraulic LifU CNG Fac lity 42,591 18-01 ITS Transit & Faratransil C.GGO CNG Fgcility+ 18-02 Hycraulic LIfUCN3 Facility Fv:C-C-4 Total 308,058.37 Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California PROJECT NUMBER (If existin ect in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID nu SRTP Project No 19-02: FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: ADA Paratransit Mini -Bus Replacement PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (For Bus Purchase projects, indicate fuel type) This request for $75,000 will be used to purchase a CNG fueled ADA Paratransit Mini -Bus to provide service to Dial -A -Ride passengers. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Due to an aging fleet an additional paratransit vehicle will be needed to provide Dial -A -Ride service at the existing level. PROJECT SCHEDULE (if existing protect in FTIP, indicate original start date and new com date Specs drawn & Issue Purchase Order: August 2019 Delivery: August 2020 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): STA Funds $75,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) None PROJECT NUMBER (If existina Droiect in FTIP. indicate FTIP ID number SRTP Project No 19-03: FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: State of Good Repair (FY 17/18) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (For Bus Purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Rehabilitation of rolling stock PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: There are two buses in the current fleet that have a considerable amount of useful life, but are in need of some mechanical rehabilitation to allow for maximum operating efficiency and reliability. Short Range Transit Plan Cliy of BANNING California PROJECT SCHEDULE (if existing protect in FTIP, indicate original start date and new com date : Specs drawn & Issue Purchase Order: August 2019 Completion of Work: December 2019 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): State of Good Repair Funds in the amount of $38,307. PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) None Table 5.1- Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2019120 Project Description Capital Project Number (1) Total .Amount of Funds LTF ST.=. Prop 1B iPThIISE.A) Prop 1B Security LCTOP Fare Box Other «' FY 19120 Operating Assistance $1.939.057 61.743.957 $194.000 $1.100 Subtotal: Operating $1.939.057 '1.743.957 SO SF, SF, $0 $194.000 51.100 Heavy Duty Hydraulic Lift 20-01 $75.000 $75.000 Subtotal: Capital $75.000 $0 $75.000 sil sil $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital $2,014,057 $1,743,957 $75,000 $o $o $0 $194,000 Note: Other (2) is from Interest Income Table 5.1— Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing protect in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID number) SRTP Project No: 20-01 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Heavy Duty Hydraulic Lift PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (For Bus Purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project will enhance the capacity of the Fleet Maintenance Division and enable significantly more onsite repairs. This will reduce the cost of subcontracting out repairs that cannot be completed currently due to the lack of this essential piece of equipment. PROJECT SCHEDULE (if existing protect in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date : Specs drawn: July and August 2018 (RFP on Street September — December 2019) Order: Award and Notice to Proceed January 2019 Delivery and Installation: Phased Implementation March — June 2019 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): STA FUNDS $75,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) None Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2020121 Project Descri tlon Capital Pro}ect Number rn Total Amount o[Fuads LTF STA Prop 113 [PTMISEA) Prop 1B Securr: LCTOP Fare Box Other' FY20121 Operating Assistance 52.035.954 51.5]' ' 5203 T00 $1.100 Subtotal: Operating 52.035954 $1.831.154 so so s0 so 5203.700 $1.100 1rve 7 Replacement Gus 21-01 S450000 S450,000 Subtotal: Capital 5450.00 SO 5450.000 So 50 So U Total: o eratin & Capital $2.485,1454 $1,231.154 $450.000 $0 $0 SO 5203.T00 S1.100 Note: t7lher 12) m from Interest Income Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California Table 5.2 — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existina Dro SRTP Project No 21-01: in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID number PROJECT NAME: TYPE 7 Replacement Bus FTIP No: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (For Bus Purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Table 5.2 — Capital Proiect Justification Due to an aging fleet, an additional bus is needed to maintain existing service and facilitate anticipated growth in our fixed -route bus system. In addition, the purchase of a new CNG fueled bus will provide increased reliability and passenger comfort, as well as replace an existing bus that it beyond it's useful life and only being kept in service to meet demand. Banning Pass Transit has the goal of maintaining a State of Good Repair with the Transit Asset Management (TAM) Business Model in mind. PROJECT SCHEDULE (if existing protect in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completior date Specs drawn: Issue Purchase Order August 2020 Order: September 2020 Delivery: August 2021 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): STA Funds $450,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) None Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California TABLE 6- PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT Audit Recommendations Action(s) Taken And Results (Covering FY 2009110 — FY 2011112) 1. Consider purchasing dispatching and scheduling Currently working with the City's IT staff and software program evaluating software programs that will best meet our operational needs 2. Provide cross -training opportunities The Transit Department has been reorganized for City Transit Administrative to allow for cross training of the dispatch and Staff operations. New Bus Schedules have been designed and 3. Update Local Bus Schedules to show connectivity show connecting bus services and transfer with Other Transit Services points to and from Banning Transit with other transit providers. 4. Provide Weblink from Banning Transit to A Weblink to Beaumont Transit is now available Beaumont Transit on Banning Transit's website. Short Range Transit Plan Cliy of BANNING California Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report M FY 2017118 Short Range Transit Plan Review r,„Mr ("I p.ftm (nmR,kn City of Banning Data Elements FY 2017 j18 Plan FY 2017118 Target FY 2017 f 18 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 199,540 Passenger Miles 413,703 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours 24,852.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 839,213.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 848,543.0 Total Operating Expenses $1,850,000 Total Passenger Fare Revenue 4187,500 Net Operating Expenses $1,662 500 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1. F.awhax Recovery Ratio 10.13 % >= 10.00%1 10.11% 1 Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost ft Revenue Hour $74.44 <= $57.09 $55.50 Meets Target 2. Subsidy per Passenger $8.33 7= $6.49 and <= $8.79 $8.35 Meets Target 3. Subsidy Et Passenger Mile $4.02 >= $2.52 and <= $3.42 $,3.25 Meets Target 4. Subsidy ft Hour $66.90 5= $42.01 and <= $56.83 $49.89 Meets Target 5. Subsidy Ru Mile $1.98 >= $1.11 and C= $1.50 $1.37 Meets Target 6. Passengers per Revenue Hour 8.00 >= 5.53 and <= 7.48 6.00 Meets Target 7. Passengers U Revenue Mile 0.241 7= m4 and <= 0.2011 0. 161 Meets Target Note; Must meet at least 4 out of I UA Etionary Partnrmance Indicators rr� MM4,[wry1o,p .{ui ,m FY 2018/19 - Table 8 -- SUP Performance Report Service Provider. City of Banning All Routes Performanoe Indicators FY 2016117 End of Year Actual FY 2017/13 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2018/19 Plan FY2018j111 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 133,185 97,370 197,950 None Passenger Miles 342,529 250,436 1,L23;444 None Revenue Hours 20,717.2 16,302.3 28,618.0 None Total Hours 22,312.6 17,455.2 31,109.0 None Revenue Miles 776,997.0 592,232.5 830,174.0 None Total Miles 785,685.0 599,321.1 844,831.0 None Operating Costs $1,973,649 $904,829 $1,653,957 None Passenger Revenue 4157,157 $91,487 $200,720 None Operating Subsidy $1,316,492 $813,342 $1,453,237 None Operating Costs ft Revenue Hour $71.13 $55.50 $57.79 <= t42.01 Fails to Meet Target Operating Cosh Revenue Mile $1.90 41.53 $1.99 None Operating Costs ft Passenger $11.06 $9.29 $8.36 None Earehott Recovery Ratio 10.66% 10.11% 12.13% >= 10.0% Meets Target Subsidy ft Passenger $9.88 $B.35 $7.34 >= $5.11 and <= $6.91 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy ft Passenger Mile $3.84 $3.25 $1.29 >= $1.99 and <= $2.69 Better Than Target Subsidy ft Revenue Hour $63.55 $49.89 $50.78 >= $30.65 and <= .$41.47 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Rez Revenue Mile $1.69 $1.37 $1.75 >= $0.85 and <= $1.15 Fails to Meet Target Passengers P_er Revenue Hour 6.,W 6.00 6.90 >= 5.10 and [= 6.90 Meets Target Passengers pt Revenue Mile 10.17 0.16 0.24 >= 0.20 and <= 0.14 Fails to Meet Target a) The Plan Performance Soorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2013119 Plan to the FY 2018119 Primary Target. Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California The City of Banning HIGHLIGHTS OF 2018/19 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN ■ Sustain and enhance service levels in Cabazon with Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Funding. ■ Existing CNG Facility will be rebuilt to ensure a reliable, safe, and efficient fueling station Is available for transit operations. ■ Purchase and install passenger information signs at key stops to inform individuals regarding next bus information. ■ Continue working with the City of Beaumont staff regarding the coordination of routes, schedules, passenger amenities, and fares to ensure that Pass Transit is seamless and offers an ease of use to Pass Area residents, while still maintaining the best service possible within our service area. ■ Evaluate strategies to increase revenue and service productivity. Table 9A BANNING TRANSIT FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 SYSTEM/PASS Audited Audited Audited Estimate Planned TRANSIT (Based 3r Quarter Actctuals) System -wide Ridership 144,978 137,594 133,185 129,826 193,950 Operating Cost Per Revenue Hours $57.50 $56.03 $71.13 $55.50 $57.79 Short Range Transit Plan City of BANNING California Table 913 - Fare Revenue Calculation (consistent with Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Revenue Sources included in Fare box Calculation Actual Amountfrom FY 16/17 Audit FY 17/18 (Plan) FY 18/19 (Plan) 1. Passenger Fares 130,112 121,982 188,000 2. Interest (1,310) 1100 1100 3. General Fund Supplement 4. Measure A 5. Advertising Revenue 6. Gain on Sale of Capital Assets 7. CNG Revenue 8. Lease/ Other Revenue 9. Federal Excise Tax Refund 28,357 27,539 31,000 10. Investment Income 11. CalPers CERBT 12. Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes 13. Other Revenues 35,443 TOTAL REVENUE for Farebox Calculation (1-13) 157,157 150,621 255,543 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 1,659,406 1,206,438 1,878,500 for Farebox Calculation FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 10.66% 10.11% 13.60% FINAL DRAFT City of Beaumont SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 PASSTRANSIT BEAUMONT TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1— SYSTEM OVERVIEW.......................................................................................... 3 1.0 Introduction..........................................................................................................................3 1.1 Description of Service Area....................................................................................................3 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections....................................................................5 1.3 Fixed Route Transit Services and Paratransit Service, Regional Express Bus Service..................8 1.4 Current and Proposed Fare Structure....................................................................................10 1.5 Revenue Fleet......................................................................................................................12 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facility...........................................................................................12 1.7 Existing Coordination Between Transit Agencies...................................................................13 CHAPTER 2 - EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE.................................................13 2.1 Fixed Route Service..............................................................................................................14 2.2 Dial -A -Ride Service...............................................................................................................22 2.3 Key Performance Indicators.................................................................................................22 2.5 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth.......................................................................22 2.6 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs.............................................................23 CHAPTER 3 - PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION.......................................24 3.1 Recent Service Changes........................................................................................................24 3.2 Recommended Service Changes...........................................................................................24 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotions..........................................................................................25 3.4 Budget Impact on Proposed Changes....................................................................................27 CHAPTER 4 — FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS.......................................................................28 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget...............................................................................................28 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program......................................29 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements...........................................................................29 Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 2 1 Page CHAPTER 1- SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.0 Introduction Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) is an annual document created for the purpose of evaluating current transit system and analyzing for improvements. Capital improvement projects are proposed for funding and operational needs assessed. Service area, demographics, and performance are considered. This document is for Beaumont Pass Transit for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018/2019 and looking ahead to FY 2019/20 and FY 2020/21. 1.1 Description of Service Area Beaumont Pass Transit fixed route services approximately 50 square miles and includes City of Beaumont, City of Calimesa and parts of unincorporated Riverside County area of Cherry Valley. Additionally, Beaumont Pass Transit transports passengers into City of Banning and commercial area of Cabazon including Casino Morongo and Premium Outlet Malls. At the center of 3 major thoroughfares, Interstate 10, Highway 60 and Highway 79, Beaumont Pass Transit offers fixed route, commuter link, and paratransit service. Passengers are able to connect easily with other Beaumont Pass Transit routes as well as with regional transit providers such as Banning Pass Transit, Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and Sunline Transit Agency at one central location, Beaumont Walmart. Beaumont Pass Transit operates Commuter Link 120 to transport Pass Area passengers into San Bernardino County Monday through Saturday. Express service stops in Beaumont, Calimesa, San Bernardino Transit Center (SBTC), and Loma Linda Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital. SBTC offers extensive connection possibilities for passengers and includes Metrolink, OmniTrans, Victor Valley Transit Agency (VVTA), RTA and Mountain Transit. System Map follows: Beaumont Pass Transit SUP 18/19 3 1 Page 3 J LULL U Q C i a p N OI 61 z f cQ G Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 4 1 Nage 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections According to the most recent report published by California Department of Finance in May 2017, Beaumont is the second fastest growing city in Riverside County; second to our neighbor to the west, City of Calimesa. Beaumont has experienced a 3% population increase from January 2016 to January 2017. California Department of Finance reports city of Beaumont population to be 46,179 in January 2017. There are 15,500 housing units in Beaumont and continues to grow in number with 450 more new single family dwelling building permits scheduled for release this year. Beaumont has 12 schools located within Beaumont Unified School District: 7 elementary, 2 middle, 1 charter, and 2 high schools. Transportation provided by Beaumont Unified School District was eliminated several years ago for middle and high school students. Many families continue to rely on public transportation to transport youth passengers to and from school. Youth population (under age 19) in Beaumont is 31%1; However, ridership reports taken throughout the year show youth passengers make up 56% of total passenger base on Beaumont Pass Transit. Beaumont has two large active adult communities, with another under construction. There is a reported senior population (persons over the age of 60) of 7,658 persons or 5.5% of Beaumont's population2. The growing active adult communities and the corresponding increase in population for this age group may impact paratransit and fixed route needs. Released in May 2017, 2012-2016 American Community 5-year Estimate done by U.S. Census Bureau shows a population of 42,191 and diversity is outlined below: Demographic RACE Total population Population I Percent Estimation 42,191 39,773 2,418 100% 94.3% 5.7% One race Two or more races One race 39,773 94.3% White 29,223 69.3% Black or African American 2,251 5.3% American Indian or Alaska Native 331 .8% Asian 3,492 8.3% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific 80 .2% Some other race 4,396 16.1% 12012-2016 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates U.S. Census Bureau 2 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates U.S. Census Bureau Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 5 1 Page Two or more races 2,418 5.7% White and Black or African 391 1 .9% White and American Indian 357 1 .8% White and Asian 454 1.1% HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total Population 42,191 100% Hispanic or Latino 17,892 42.4% Mexican 15,376 36.4% Puerto Rican 548 1.3% Cuban 145 .3% Other Hispanic or Latino 1,823 4.3% Not Hispanic or Latino 24,299 57.6% White alone 17,447 41.4% Black or African American alone 2,158 5.1% American Indian or Alaska Native 78 .2% Asian alone 3,383 8.0% Native Hawaiian or other Pacific 80 Some other race alone j 54 Two or more races 1 1,089 .2% .2% 2.6% Ridership Demographics Ridership surveys conducted in 2013 show the average passenger to be 21 years of age, 56% of all passengers are female, and Veterans of Armed Forces make up 2% of all passengers. The following charts are compiled from data collected from 2013 passenger surveys: Age of Passengers Under 18 Years 19-50 Years 50+ Years Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 6 1 Page 5% Employment Status 18`30 19% Household Income (Excluding Youth Passenger Data) 5% 6% ■ Full Time or Part Time ■ K-12 Students s College Students ■ Retired ■ Unemployed/Homemakers Less than $7,500 $7,500-14,999 $15,000-24,999 $25,000-34,999 $35,000-49,999 $50,000-74,999 Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 7 1 Page 11% Passenger Ethnicity 35% Latino/Hispanic White/Caucasian Black/African American General passengers surveyed indicate 58% do not currently have a driver's license, 55% state they do not have access to an operating vehicle and are transit dependent, and 33% are discretionary riders, have access to a vehicle, and choose to ride public transit because driving is too expensive. 1.3 Fixed Route Transit Services and Paratransit Service, Regional Express Bus Service Beaumont Pass Transit operates seven days a week. Routes are planned based on needs, residential density and popular destinations. Fixed Route Beaumont Pass Transit operates a total of seven fixed routes and one Commuter Link (CL) service. Days of operation are as follows: Sunday Mom Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Route 2 Route 2 Route 2 Route 2 Route 2 Route 2 Route 2 Route 3 Route 3 Route 3 Route 3 Route 3 Route 4 Route 4 Route 4 Route 4 Route 4 Route 7* Route 7* Route 7* Route 7* Route 7* Route 9* Route 9* Route 9* Route 9* Route 9* Route 136 Route 136 Route 136 CL 120 Route 136 CL 120 Route 136 CL 120 CL 120 CL 120 CL120 Route 3/4 T reaK bervice Beaumont Pass Transit 5RTP 18/19 8 1 Page Monday — Friday, Route 2 is operated by two buses, Route 7 with three, and Route 3 with two during peak hours. During the peak of the service weekday, 11 buses are on route. Fixed route and commuter service is projected to shows passenger trips nearly the same in FY 18 compared to FY 17 with a .3% increase. Passenger trips are projected to end FY 18 with 186,173. Service hours are as follows and correspond with Commuter Link Service, our longest running route: Monday through Friday 5:25 a.m. to 7:55 p.m. Saturday and Sunday 7:20 a.m. to 6:50 p.m. During the holidays of Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Presidents' Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, and Day after Thanksgiving, Beaumont Pass Transit operates limited service and follows a Saturday schedule. Beaumont Pass Transit does not operate on New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day or Christmas Day. Paratransit Services Paratransit service, otherwise known as Dial -A -Ride (DAR), is a reservation based curb to curb service for residents of Beaumont, Calimesa and parts of unincorporated area of Riverside County known as Cherry Valley. Qualified passengers include those who reside 3/4 of a mile from a fixed bus route and are certified under American Disabilities Act (ADA). In Beaumont and Cherry Valley, a qualified passenger extends to seniors over the age of 65. DAR service has experienced a slight decrease in passenger trips with a .4% decrease in projected trips in FY 18 compared to FY 17. FY 18 projection of passenger trips is 10,799. DAR service hours are: Persons with ADA certification Monday through Friday 6:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Saturday and Sunday 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Senior without ADA certification Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. DAR observes the same holiday schedule as fixed route system. Limited Service is provided on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Presidents' Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, and Day after Thanksgiving. No service is provided on New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, or Christmas Day. Beaumont Pass Transit SUP 18/19 9 1 Page Regional Express Bus Service Commuter Link 120 was introduced in 2013 and is Beaumont Pass Transit's Regional Express Bus Service. Since 2013, ridership has increased as well as available connections with regional agencies. This service travels from Beaumont Walmart and Civic Center with stops in Calimesa, SBTC and Loma Linda VA Hospital. At SBTC, passengers are able to connect with Metrolink, OmniTrans, RTA, Mountain Transit and VVTA. Commuter Link 120 has grown over the years. Projection of passenger trips in FY 18 is 11,692 and is a 3% increase over FY 17. Since FY 2016, Commuter Link 120 has showed a 8.6% increase in passenger trips. 1.4 Current and Proposed Fare Structure In 2012, Beaumont Pass Transit adopted the current fare schedule. There have been some adjustments since then. In FY 17, additional fare types were added specifically as it pertains to commuter service. 'Commuter Plus (+) Local' fare types for fixed route day and monthly passes were added to the structure. In FY 18 Beaumont Transit removed youth fare category from the fixed route fare schedule and combined it with the category of general passenger, following suit with other regional agencies. It is proposed in FY 19 to adjust the prices of our fare media as it pertains to the 10 Ticket books. Currently, ticket books for general passengers are at a price point of $10.35 per book and equates to 10 rides for the price of 9. It is proposed to have a price increase to $11.50 per book for general passenger and $6.50 for Senior/Disabled. The price increase will reflect the actual value of each ride when each ride is $1.15 for general and $.65 for Senior/Disabled. The adjustment in price point is necessary due to the cost to produce the books which is $.41 each. Beaumont Transit continues to explore Fare Media outlets to give access to purchase of multi use passes to our passengers. In FY 19, will be launching a demo of Token Transit on our Commuter Service. Token Transit is a mobile fare app making it easy for passengers to purchase their one way or multi use fare on their smart phones. Many of our neighboring agencies have begun using this mobile fare app, and for consistency with passengers, we will launch with our commuting passengers on Commuter Link 120. Finally, a system wide fare study, in cooperation with Banning Pass Transit, is proposed for FY 19. Included will be fare for DAR and FR services. Current fare schedule follows: Beaumont Pass Transit SUP 18/19 10 1 Page e Fare Categories Base Fare Day Pass 30 Ride Punch Card 10 Ticket Book Monthly Pass General $1.15 $3.00 N/A $36.00 Child (46" tall or under) Accompenled by a pavingadult $,25 N/A N/A N/A N/A Senior/Disabled (60+)* $,65 $1.80 N/A $21.50 Military Veterans* $.65 $1.80 N/A $21.50 Deviations (Route 3) $,25 $.25 N/A N/A N/A Jury Duty** FREE N/A N/A N/A N/A Go Pass: MSJC students* (During valid sdwol session oriy) FREE N/A N/A N/A N/A Active Military* FREE N/A N/A N/A N/A S!TER LINK 120 FARES Fare Categories Base Fare 10 Ride Punch Card COMMUTER 1.11 120+LOCALFARES pay pass Monthly Pus General $3.00 $27.00 $7.00 $75.00 Child (46" tall or under) A000mponled by a paving adult $2.00 $18.00 $5.00 $50.00 senior/Disabled* $2.00 $18.00 $5.00 $50.00 Military veterans* $2.00 $18.00 $5.00 $50.00 Active Military* FREE N/A N/A N/A * If you plan to use a senior, disabled, youth, military or GoPass discounted fare, you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. You must also show proper ID to purchase discounbed passes/tickets. I Jury Duty - All jurors summoned to serve in Banning Courthouses are able to ride fur free directly to and from the courthouse via Route 2. Jurors must show their current and valid juror summons badge to the bus driver. Fare Categories Base Fare 10-Ride Punch Card One -Way $2.00 $18.00 Companion & Child (46" tall or under) $3.00 N/A PCA(w/I.D.)** FREE FREE No show $2.00 N/A * Red indicates proposed fare increase Dial -A -Ride is a transportation service for ADA, disabled and seniors over 65 years of age. Reservations are required at least 24-hours in advance and may be made by calling (951) 769-8532. **If you plan to use a PCA (Personal Care Attendant) free fare you must show proper ID each time you board the bus. Questions? (951) 769-8530 PASSTRANSIT Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 111 Page 1.5 Revenue Fleet Fleet Characteristics Beaumont Pass Transit consists of eighteen (18) vehicles. Fifteen are cutaways and three are 40 foot buses. Of the eighteen vehicles, nine are fueled by Compressed Natural Gas (CNG); the other nine are gasoline fueled. All recent and future bus purchases are powered by CNG, as is RCTC's policy. All vehicles are outfitted with bike racks and are ADA compliant with wheelchair lifts and tie down stations. Three buses have audio announcement systems for the visually impaired. Thirteen are equipped with passenger seatbelts. Eighteen vehicles are made up as follows: - Six (6) are Ford E-450 16 passenger buses o Five (5) are gasoline powered; One (1) is CNG - Five (5) are Ford F-550 30 passenger buses o Three (3) are gasoline powered; Two (2) are CNG - Four (4) are C-5500 o One (1) gasoline powered; Three (3) CNG - Three (3) are XHF-40 powered by CNG 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facility Existing Facility Administrative services for Transit Department are located in downtown Beaumont at Beaumont Civic Center located at 550 E 6th Street, Building D. It is at this location where dispatch, administrative assistance and bus yard are located. Fleet maintenance service is located at 550 California Ave, approximately 1 mile from the administrative building. Customer service required over the telephone including general information, route planning, and Dial -A -Ride appointments are completed by the Transit Department. Walk in customers, including the purchase of fare media, are completed at City Hall, Police Department or Community Services buildings. Planned Facility At the forefront of our operations is the design and construction of a CNG station. For too many years, Beaumont Pass Transit has been without a CNG station to fuel its fleet. With an increasing desire to make our fleet 100% clean transportation, to do so requires a fueling station. In FY 18, after some long awaited remodeling and repairs to the only CNG station in Beaumont, located at Beaumont Unified School District, Beaumont Pass Transit CNG buses are able to fuel there within specific hours Monday through Friday. Although we are able to fuel locally during these hours, it is still necessary to drive our fleet to other locations to fuel which include a one way trip of 14.6 miles to RTA fueling station in City of Hemet. Another location is 18.3 miles away in City of Moreno Valley. Our last option for CNG fuel is in City of Redlands located 17.6 miles way. Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 12 1 Page Beaumont has issued two Requests for Proposal (RFP) in FY 18 seeking a responsible consultant to conduct a feasibility study of two preselected locations for the CNG Station. After approval from City Council, the same consultant in the scope of work will prepare construction documents for the release of bid for the construction of the station. Feasibility study has experience several delays and is currently still in process. 1.7 Existing Coordination between Transit Agencies Because of geographical isolation, coordination is vital for the movement of passengers. Passengers traverse cities to accomplish needs such as social services in Banning as well as shopping in Beaumont. Beaumont Pass Transit has implemented multiple agreements with surrounding Transit Agencies. Beaumont has cooperative agreements with Banning Pass Transit, OmniTrans, RTA, and VVTA. The most common cooperative agreement encountered on a day to day basis is with Banning Pass Transit. Coordination of routes, time table, fare schedule and branding offer a seamless travel experience for passengers of Pass Transit. Fare media, such as presale tickets, day and monthly passes are used interchangeably on any Pass Transit bus. There are a few fare media types that are the exception: Banning's youth monthly pass, Banning's student pass, as well as Beaumont's Commuter Link day and monthly passes. As Beaumont Pass Transit expands service to critical connection areas such as SBTC, Cooperative Agreements have become more prevalent and necessary. Agreements with OmniTrans, RTA and VVTA have added value for connecting passengers. - Passengers presenting a Beaumont Pass Transit multi use (day or month) pass are able to connect to OmniTrans, RTA or VVTA for free wherever the two agencies connect. - Passengers presenting a multi use (day, week or month) pass from OmniTrans or VVTA receive a $1.00 discount on commuter service or free connection with our fixed route wherever we connect. - Passengers presenting RTA multi use pass (day, week or month) connect for free to Beaumont's commuter and fixed route service wherever the two agencies connect. In FY 19, we hope to update the cooperative agreement with Banning Pass Transit to include a discussion of revenue equal to a percentage of operating costs for inter -city bus service. CHAPTER 2 - EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE Overall ridership is projected to remain flat in FY 18 in comparison to FY 17. FY 18 is projected to see 1.96,972 passenger trips, and is a .3% increase or 595 passenger trips less than FY 17. However, system wide FY 18 is projected to see an 8.4% decrease when compared to FY 16. Beaumont Pass Transit offers three types of service: fixed route, commuter, and paratransit. Beaumont Pass Transit SUP 18/19 13 1 Page 2.1 Fixed Route Service Beaumont Pass Transit system operates seven fixed routes, one commuter link, and two paratransit service. Total system wide passenger trips are divided among fixed routes service with 89%, commuter service with 7% and paratransit for 4% of the total passenger trips Route 2 -Beaumont to Cabazon Beaumont Pass Transit's trunk route is Route 2 and has two-hour headway from Beaumont to Cabazon. Weekday service is achieved by two buses, referred to internally as Route 2-1 and 2-2. Both Saturday and Sunday have one bus on the route. This route services many low income apartment complexes and brings passengers to major places of interest such as commercial, grocery, social services, and employment opportunities. Route 2 has experienced a decline in passenger trips in recent years. A projected 196,972 passenger trips in FY 18 is a decrease of 5.1% compared to FY 17 and a 14.86% decrease compared to FY 16. Route 2 makes up 34.8% of all passenger trips system wide and averages 9.4 passengers transported per revenue hour. Cougar Way Cougar Way V. BeaurnontAve Transfer to 3 4 Routes 9 To !Z Routing and timetables subject to change. San Gorgonio Hospital 3 4 Satrdat Transfer 3/4 to{from Barmg Pass T.,&wt f,586 PASSTRANSIT Legend I Map not Tyne Point Transfer Point Other Transit Provider 8th St O o a On Sem 6th St is Ramsey Sl .i 0 r'a >_ Ln N .. .. _ 0. Transfer to/from 3 4 �3/4 120 ff Transfer Sun to/frog; RTART.A Sun Banning 1 220 Amtrak 31 210 220 1, 5 & 6 r a REAL-TIME _rt St BUS TRACKING M.wnenWeuMpn.p[e- Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 14 1 Page Route 3 - Beaumont High School to Walmart via Sundance Route 3 is a weekday one hour headway servicing north area of Beaumont including parts of Cherry Valley to Walmart via the easternmost residential community commonly known as Sundance. It also has a deviation built into the route for those living outside City of Beaumont city limits, in Cherry Valley, north of Brookside Ave. Included in the design of this route are two elementary schools, both middle schools and high school. To assist during afternoon peak hours, a tripper bus is in place to assist with the safe passage of passengers. Route 3 has experienced a decline in passenger trips over the years. Projection of FY 18 shows a total of 27,061 passenger trips and is a 9.3% decline over FY 17 and a 15.6% decrease compared to FY 16. Route 3 currently makes up 13.74% of total system wide passenger trips and averages 9 passengers transported per revenue hour. ,10 Routing end tirnotables Vineland Ave subject to change. u a 1 Time Point c Tnnshr Point Otiur Ttansit Provider EM ❑N Cherry Valley Blvd a r•+ REAL-TIME Tmisrer wUsTRAr K.-s�wNG Rmfl. 7 9 Tmsfer 4 �� ' rofiom Route CL;Upi Way L 7rarcfer V to/imm 2 7 9 0 Rout. Oak Valley Pkwy Q t _a t m in Tmufer 2 4 to/Nam i3Lh Si Routes �annq Tnrcfer talNom L�1] -•, �I� L5a6 Routh 2 4 _ V ry x 6th St m Trenrk+r 2 no C BenNng RiA RfA SUN Vn1 1, 5l.6 31 210 xto � 2Rd St � c L Q 1st St Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 15 1 Page Route 4 - Downtown to Walmart Route 4 is a weekday one hour headway route which runs primarily east to west via downtown residential areas. The route connects passengers with library, two elementary schools, community center, both middle schools and commercial shopping area of Walmart. Deviation is available to residential and industrial area south of Interstate 10. Route 4 has experienced a decline in passenger trips. A projected 23,799 passengers will make a trip on Route 4 in FY 18 and is a 3.75% decline over FY 17 and 21.85% decline over FY 16. Route 4 makes up 12.08% of system wide passenger trips and averages 7.7 passengers transported per revenue hour. Cherry Valley Blvd z� I �•r s m O 1 - --------' SA Tramfer tollmm 2 3 ak Yalky ParkNay Routes 7 9 4 I ; o E E m st a I g Rd Rmitblg and timetables subject to change. Broolmkk Ave .._.._.._.._.._� a Cougar Way [s 01. stil st Legend I Map not to scale Time Point ® Transfer Point Other Transit Provider 4� Alternate Morning Route e sth St o a' Tmrnier S' to/fmm 2 17D _ t N Route -� s x Tmrato/fmkr 2 3 9 ]2g 3 ® Routes RTA RTA SINE B sp 31 210 PPB & 6 1st St REAL-TIME pq S TRAM SIT SUS TRACKING Wilson St lA � I= Ramsey St N Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 16 1 Page Route 7- Tournament Hills/FairwayHills/Fairway Canyon to Beaumont Hi h School Route 7 is a weekday service peak hour service. This route was designed to service passengers during the peak hours of morning and afternoon between the westernmost residential areas of Beaumont, both middle schools, and high school. There are two buses on this route, which we internally refer to as Route 7-1 and 7-2. There is also an afternoon tripper for the peak hours. Route 7 has experienced an increase in passenger trips over the years. A projected 34,521 passenger trips will be made to end FY 18. This is a 6.2% increase over FY 17. Passenger trips compared to FY 16 is similar and is .14% increase. Passengers make up 17.52% of total system wide passenger trips and averages 40 passengers transported per revenue hour. (when school is in session) A Routing and Unu* blea subject to change. Transfer 60 3 9 Routes Cherry Valley SIM :3rad;side Ave W Monte Verde O� Transfer to/ 3 4 frorn R%fas 'A YFFEVIONE ID*CM 2 3 9 m Raures 0woo "ii`� �kVaYleY parytv>sY Legend scale . r Time Point REAL-TIMEAe ® Transfer Point BUSTRACKING —p— Afternoon bus from BHS .awnonedeu b—d- Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 17 1 Page Route 9 - Seneca Springs to Beaumont High School Route 9 is a weekday peak hour service and was designed to service passengers during the peak morning and afternoon hours between Beaumont's south east residential area, both middle schools, and high school. Route 9 has experienced a significant increase in recent years. A projected 14,340 passenger trips will be made in FY 18 and is a 23.84% increase compared to FY 17. Compared to FY 16, this is a 20.7% increase. Route 9 makes up 7.28% of system wide passenger trips and averages 32.4 passengers transported per revenue hour. "4q ROUTE 9 WEEKDAY Seneca Springs SERVICE (when school is in session) Beaumont High School Cougar Way & i Beaumont Ave @ Orchard Park Apts Cougar Way & Beaumont Ave Pennsylvania Ave & Sth Street Routing and tirnetables subject to change. Time and/or Transfer Point Transfer Point - - - Afternoon Alternate Other Transit Provider Sih St r7120 2nd Street Brownie M. N."A REAL-TIME pqSSTRAhISIT BUS TRACKING b1•umene.do.bl.m�p.eom Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 18 1 Page Route 136- Calimesa Route 136 was introduced in August 2016 to service City of Calimesa. The route has a 20 minute headway and services central residential areas of Calimesa while offering service to passengers in the outlying areas during morning and afternoon peak times. This route services Calimesa City Hall and Senior Center and commercial areas. This route also connects passengers with Commuter Link 120 on Calimesa Blvd as well as with OmniTrans on County Line Road. Route 136 is projected to experience an increase in FY 18 with 3,413 passenger trips compared to 2,050 in FY 17. This route makes up 1.7% of total system wide passenger trips, has 1.26 passengers per revenue hour. 'le Routing and timetables subject to change. On Ave K 's"Om.alli m ' Avenue L 11 I 1 ASSTI Myrtlewood or — Orrs 1� -dd 61010- r- 1 0 1 / Legend I Map not t Time Point ® Transfer Point •• Morning/Afternoon Alternate (when school is in session) T Alternate Time Point PASSTMNSI 0 Deviation Available. Call (951) 769-8530 to schedule. Line Rd � o singiemn Rd j �' . 17 0W REAL-TIME BUSKING Beaumont Pass Transit SUP 18/19 19 1 Page Route 3 4 — Saturday service from Cherry Valley to Walmart Route 3/4 is a one hour headway service and offers Saturday service as well as limited service on recognized holidays. It is a combination route of Routes 3 and 4. This route has experienced a projected increase of 2,753 passenger trips for FY 18 and is a 11.12% increase over FY 17. This route makes up 1.4% of total system wide passenger trips and averages 5.2 passengers transported per revenue hour. 'I0 A a ¢' Vineland St c m Z Cherry Valley Blvd I I. F Brookside Ave Caugar Way a E m a E 12th St a' ¢' E c W 7 1mm Routing and timetables subject to change. N ai Z t 0 Oak Valley Pkwy .• • I Map not to scale Time Point a' ® Transfer Point to Route 2 �a C 10 N C C a 6th St E 8th St U7thSt a 6 On x E 6th St �■ ® c .Q u 2nd St ra REAL-TIME PA S STRANSIT E BUS TRACKING Beaumont Pass Transit SUP 18/19 20 1 Page Commuter Link 120 Commuter Link 120 is an express commuter service connecting the Pass Area with San Bernardino County. Originating at Beaumont Walmart, this express service stops at Beaumont Civic Center, Calimesa, SBTC and Loma Linda VA Hospital. This route has experienced an increase over the years. Projected passenger trips of 11,692 in FY 18 are an increase of 3% over FY 17 and 8.56% increase over FY 16. Passenger trips on this service make up 5.9% of total system wide passenger trips and transports on an average, 2.2 passengers per revenue hour. Beaumont to Callimesa. San Bernardino Transit Cente & Loma Linda VA -Oak- Effective January 8. 2018 Routing and tYnetablea subject to change. 2nd Street rnLoma Linda VA Hospital rn Transfer I . Rialto Ave rt to/from Omnffirals' no San Bernardino —RANSIl'-,, Transit Center :.INTER Transfer to/ ■ Benton St from °C vA Omndrans ME -MC .K AosPrl'.9c A a° County Line Road Transfer to/ from Route n !L Myrtlewood Dr pass 136 Transit e a Beaumont Walmart Trans- fer tolfrom Routes 2, 3, 4, & 9, Sat 3/4 Magnolia Ave---- Route RTA 31 Banning Pass = z Pass Transit 2 Sun Line 220 Transit 1, 5 & 6 o' ® +N c. o®Legend I Map not to scale N Time Point 2nd Street m PASSTRAN51T ® Transfer Point Other Transit Provider For more information:(951) 769-8530 Beaumont Pass Transit SUP 18/19 211 Page 2.2 Dial -A -Ride Service (DAR) DAR is made up of two buses and is a reservation based system. This curb to curb service is a complimentary service to our fixed route system and is available to qualified passengers. Service is provided for persons with ADA certification in the cities of Beaumont, Calimesa and parts of Cherry Valley who live 3/4 of a mile from a fixed bus route. Certification is obtained through the ADA application process with RTA. Additionally, this service is also available for persons over the age of 65 in Beaumont and parts of Cherry Valley. DAR has experienced a .8% decrease over FY 17. DAR passengers make up 5.48% of system wide ridership and average 3.4 passengers transported per revenue hour. 2.3 Key Performance Indicators Riverside County Transportation Commission adopted a Productivity Improvement Plan (PIP) for the transit operators of Riverside County. The PIP sets efficiency and effectiveness standards that transit operators are to meet. Progresses towards these standards are reported to the Commission. They are found in Tables 7 and 8 of this document. 2.4 Productivity Improvement Efforts Beaumont Pass Transit uses several products to keep passengers connected with system information and announcements. These products are: 1- Facebook, 2- Double Map, a web based real time GPS bus locating system, 3- Google Transit, internet trip planning, and 4- Everbridge, a mass communication system operated in conjunction with Beaumont PD. Pass Area residents are invited to attend Travel Training trips led by the staff of Beaumont Pass Transit. Destinations include Los Angeles Union Station, Downtown Disney, and Oceanside. The purpose of travel training is to empower the public with strategy and knowledge of Pass Transit system, as well as other regional connecting systems such as Metrolink, RTA and Metro. Education of public transit, by means of travel training informational meetings and outings, will assist in the alleviation of common fears surrounding public transit and get passengers comfortable with moving around and using public transportation. Multimodal bike sharing program will be explored in FY 19 to educate the public to use a bike for the first and last mile of their trip. To help our system grow, Beaumont intends to conduct a Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) in conjunction with but independently of Banning Pass Transit. A COA was last conducted in 2013 and although it was not formally adopted, parts of its analysis were implemented. Assumptions were made of both cities of Beaumont and Banning regarding the needs and projected population growth. The actual pattern of residential growth has differed from what was projected at the time. 2.5 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth More than half of Beaumont Pass Transit's passengers attend BUSD schools. They are primarily traveling to and from home and high school/middle schools. This particular clientele is expected to increase as the population and housing continues to grow. To service a larger Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 22 1 Page audience of this category, peak hour services have been adjusted. There will be no added buses for peak service in FY 19. Peak oriented Service costs more to provide than all -day service because they require additional vehicles and drivers which are not utilized to their full potentia13. City of Beaumont continues to grow with 450 more homes planned for FY 19. Beaumont Transit is challenged with the opportunity to grow with the population. Our population is currently reported to be 46,179 by California Department of Finance. As it quickly approaches 50,000, Beaumont will soon be in the urban category therefore requiring 20% farebox recovery ratio as mandated by the Transportation Development Act (TDA). Homes are being built in previously vacant land areas. Routes will be created or adjusted based on need for service in the areas. As the only means of connection from the Pass Area to San Bernardino, Commuter Link 120 continues to grow in ridership. The move of Metrolink to the SBTC in December 2017 has made it easier for passengers to connect to rail as well as other transit agencies. The schedule was updated to give passengers more opportunity to connect with the train and other regional agencies. Additionally, the schedule change allowed for more frequency and on -time reliability for our passengers. 2.6 Equipment, Passenger Amenities and Facility Needs A continuous look at our future and the amenities needed to grow our system, show a need for replacement of vehicles. Nine of our eighteen vehicles are over 200,000 miles. Of the nine, six have over 250,000 miles and three of those are over 290,000 miles as reported at end of March 2018. Funding for replacement will be necessary in the coming years. Delivery time of one year from date of approved purchase is a normal experience for bus procurement in Beaumont. At least three buses are nearing retirement and are considered for replacement. Twenty-two (22) shelters have been installed in Beaumont. Half of them are prominently in commercial areas serviced by Route 2. The other half are located in high ridership areas such as high density residential areas and schools. There are also a dozen benches strategically placed in Beaumont service system. Benches have also been installed in the city of Calimesa at critical commercial area where passengers connect with current Route 136 as well as Commuter Link 120. Needed in the coming fiscal years is the revamping of the system signage including bus stop signs, schedule holders and bus graphics. Bus stop signs, originally installed in early 2000's, have become faded and invisible to untrained eyes. Repurposed from RTA, schedule holders were donated, installed and are currently in use in Beaumont since 2010. These schedule holders have become increasingly difficult to maintain since plexi-glass is required. At a cost of $8 each, broken plexi glass is difficult to replace. Lastly is the graphics on vehicles themselves. In 2017, city of Beaumont moved away from 'Beaumont Cares' branding design citywide. This 3 TMD, Comprehensive Operations Analysis City of Beaumont Service Recommendations, June 2014. Beaumont Pass Transit SUP 18/19 23 1 Page graphic was prominently displayed on the back of most of our vehicles. Since this branding was removed, a replacement has not been installed. A new city branding is currently being worked on and will need to be placed on vehicles to fill the space. Coming in FY 19 will be the modernization of the vehicle maintenance facility. Vehicle maintenance is currently occupying an unreinforced masonry building and conducting vehicle repairs unprotected from the elements. There is not a covered structure for mechanics to protect themselves or their work from the weather. With the help of State of Good Repair (SGR) Grant, and approved capital projects from previous years, it is intended to install a permanent canopy and modernize the facility. To help Beaumont reach its impending goal of 20% farebox, advertising programs for buses, shelters and/or benches will be explored. Revenues will be used to meet the farebox requirement. CHAPTER 3 - PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION 3.1 Recent Service Changes In December 2017 service on Routes 2, 3 and 4 were analyzed for productivity. It was apparent that service was not being utilized in the last hour of each of the above listed routes. It was discovered that service was not being used and buses were riding empty. Consequently, the last loop of each route was eliminated. In January 2018, Commuter Link 120 schedule was adjusted. Those passengers traveling from Beaumont to SBTC often are connecting with other agencies. In consideration to our passengers, timetables of other agencies were analyzed and Commuter Link 120 schedule adjusted. The schedule was adjusted in relation to the move of Metrolink to SBTC as well as RTA's new Commuter Link 120 to Anaheim. 3.2 Recommended Service Changes In FY 19 Beaumont Pass Transit will bring the addition of a new route, elimination of another and the restructuring of the system as a whole. Commuter Link 125 will debut in Fall of 2018 and Calimesa Route 136 will come to an end. With the addition of 125, Commuter 120 route can be restructured and other routes mapped and timed appropriately. The new Commuter Link 125 will offer Pass Area passengers another means to travel from Beaumont and Calimesa to Redlands and Loma Linda. It will stop at the commercial and retail center on the corner of Alabama and Lugonia before stopping at Kaiser Permanente Redlands Medical Offices on California St., and VA Ambulatory Care Center on Redlands Blvd. This route will be a weekday only service. The added service to VA Ambulatory Care Center will allow for the restructuring of Commuter Link 120. Commuter Link 120 currently services Loma Linda VA Hospital after stopping at SBTC. Over a year ago, with the opening of the VA Ambulatory Care Center, most doctors moved from the Beaumont Pass Transit SUP 18/19 24 1 Page hospital to the Care Center. It is intended to change the schedule of 120 to eliminate the stop at VA Hospital when Commuter Link 125 starts service to the Care Center. Currently, passengers traveling to VA on 120 have an average of 1 hour 15 minutes to their destination from Beaumont. On 125, the same passenger will arrive at the VA Care Center in 45 minutes. Calimesa Route 136 was launched in August 2016 and has gone under a couple of different route changes to increase passenger base. Beaumont has entered into a cooperative agreement with Yucaipa Calimesa Unified School District to allow our bus to traverse Mesa View Middle School property to service passengers. This agreement did increase total amount of passenger trips, but not to the level that makes this route sustainable. It is apparent that fixed route service is not feasible at this time in Calimesa. Daytime population of Calimesa is primarily senior and disabled who prefer curb -to -curb service. A Lyft voucher program is being explored for Senior and ADA passengers. This voucher program will mirror a similar program offered by OmniTrans. The program consists of a 50-50 share in fare directly redeemable with Lyft when the service is used. An express route to Casino Morongo is also being explored for peak hour service from Walmart to Cabazon. As one of the primary employers in the Pass Area, this express route will bring passengers from Beaumont Walmart to Casino Morongo and Outlet Mall. To avoid duplicate service to the same, Beaumont Transit will work together with Sunline and coordinate schedules. A golf cart program will be analyzed for feasibility. In partnership with local private communities, residents have expressed a need for transportation from their homes to places of interest within the private communities such as the clubhouse. This proposed project will be a partnership for means and equipment to operate such service. 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotions In the month of July, $.25 (twenty five cent) fare for youth passengers is offered on weekday Route 3, Route 4 and Saturday Route 3/4. Youth passengers, under the age of 18, can enjoy points of interest that these routes service. Destinations include the Community Center, library, Sports Park, city pool, shopping, as well as multiple parks. In conjunction with October's Breast Cancer Awareness month, passengers wearing pink on Wednesdays are given a raffle ticket as they board the bus. A drawing of a winning raffle ticket was drawn each week for a November monthly pass. The winning ticket number and winner were posted on Pass Transit's Facebook. Marketing and promotional appearances are attended throughout the year. Informational booths at back -to -school nights and orientations are attended by staff, annual Veteran's Expo, 'Stuff the Bus' food drive, Rider Appreciation events, and multiple community presentations and events. Throughout the year our service is marketed with free rides, visible appearances, and provides functional use for the City. The opportunity to present the service and fleet to a captive audience has had positive effects with the community that would have normally not considered Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 25 1 Page public transit. In 2017, three parades were participated in: Cherry Festival parade and two holiday light parades. Cherry Festival Parade: June 2017- `All for Fun and Fun for,' Holiday Light Parade: December 2017 in City of Beaumont and City of Calime Beaumont Pass Transit offer free shuttle service for Cherry Festival and 41h of July fireworks show and concert. Both events are located at the same location, Stewart Park. The park is in the center of a residential area that does not have sufficient parking for the amount of attendees. Cherry Festival is a 4 day event that draws about 50,000 patrons to the park located at the heart of downtown Beaumont. Last year, over 1,000 passengers combined took advantage of the free service. Travel Training continues to be a successful program to teach Pass Area residents how to ride public transportation from the Pass Area to places of interest. Monthly trips are taken to Union Station via Metrolink and to Downtown Disney with RTA. A common consensus with passengers is that public transportation is intimidating. Travel training offers guidance to individuals, ease concerns, and empower passengers to make similar trips on their own in the future. Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 26 1 Page A grant has been applied for through the Low Carbon Transportation Operations Program (LCTOP) for a Free Fare Project. This Free Fare Project will allow for marketing and promotions to targeted groups of people. Free Fare Project, which will be a 3 year program, will market free fare on all Beaumont Pass Transit fixed and commuter routes to all college students, veterans, and travel training participants. Among other benefits, the project will allow for several rider appreciation days and special events such as Dump the Pump and Free Fare Friday. 3.4 Budget Impact on Proposed Changes The launch of new Commuter Link 125 to the medical and shopping areas of Redlands and Loma Linda will have an impact on the budget. However, Beaumont Transit has secured two grants for the operations of this route totaling $80,518. Along with the end of Route 136, budgeted monies will be reprogrammed to 125. City of Calimesa will be serviced with this new Commuter Link. FY 19 budget should not be adversely impacted the first year by the new Commuter Link 125. Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 27 1 Page Loma Linda VA Medical Center Transfer to/from .i. 6 1Q Legend I u not to scale L Time Point @® Transfer Point Pass Transit 2, 3, 4, & 9 RTA 31 1 Banning 1 x and Combo o'o S_ W ALMARF al N 2nd Street r. REAL-TIME eUffi TRACKING Almond Ave Routng and tknatables subject to ebange. leH j% CrMUS to M PIAM KAISER C o E Alabama MEnrctc OFFICES onia NB A . - a from W Lugonia Ave ffrans 15 County Line Road Calimesa THE a Transfer to/ SHOPPES from Route I m _ Myrtlewood Dr pass 120 Transit STATER rymry� gl BROS to _ i d FARGO Aft a Magnolia Ave ' e rPassTransit 2 I' tEAUMONT CIVIC CENTER (PARK&RIDE) Routing and timetables subject to change. PASSTRANSIT + N CHAPTER 4 - FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget Beaumont Pass Transit is requesting $2,670,933 in LTF funding for FY 2019, this is the same amount as requested in FY 18. Included with this is the Free Fare Project which is a part of our projected farebox recovery. Capital improvement project listed on Table 4 is project 19-01. This project is the most critical of all projects for Beaumont Pass Transit. Project 19-01 is in the amount of $300,000 and is for Beaumont Pass Transit SUP 18/19 28 1 Page the construction of CNG station. At a projected cost of 1.5 million dollars to construct a CNG station for public and private use, this dollar amount will be combined with capital funding requested over previous years. This request, previous capital funding requests, and a Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Committee (MSRC) grant, brings the amount available for project completion in line with projected costs. Beaumont has begun the beginning process of this project by selecting a consultant to conduct a feasibility study of two preselected sites. It is expected the station will begin to be built in summer 2019. Capital project 19-02, in the amount of $175,000, is for the purchase of a Type H EZ Rider II Vehicle. A grant for the same purpose from MSRC in the amount of $25,000 is listed as project 19-03. These two sources of funding, in conjunction with multiple other capital project funding sources, will be used for the purchase of the vehicle to be delivered in FY 19. Project 19-04 is a State of Good Repair (SGR) project to modernize the maintenance facility in the amount of $66,478. The project need is addressed in Section 2.6 of this report and will be used in conjunction with previously approved capital project funding. 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program Capital projects are funded through STA as well as from LCTOP, MSRC and SGR grants. 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements The American with Disabilities Act of 1990 The Dial -A -Ride service provides ADA paratransit service as a required element of ADA. The system uses a self -certification process with professional verification. Pass Area Transit works with RTA to certify ADA passengers and work under the umbrella of RTA's ADA policy. Title VI The Pass Transit System does not utilize federal funds for operating expenses. As such, Title VI requirements do not currently apply to the transit system. Alternatively Fueled Vehicles (RCTC Policy) The Pass Transit System operates nine CNG buses and nine gasoline powered. Future vehicle purchases, like all current purchases, will be in compliance with the RCTC and SCAQMD policies regarding alternative fuel transit vehicles. Recent events have led to the limitation of Beaumont Transit's use of BUSD fueling station and the inability to use Banning maintenance yard pumps. It is increasingly critical to the operations in Beaumont to secure CNG fuel. State Transit Assistance (STA) Compliance At this time, Beaumont does not utilize STA funding for operating expenses. As such, compliance with the Public Utilities Commission requirement is not applicable. Beaumont Pass Transit SRTP 18/19 29 1 Page N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r O 0 r r r r r r r r r O O r e* -1 O %D w In VI 0 r O r r r VI %D 00 O X 3 C my my o O my o 0 omo amo 3 3 X n z z z z z z z z n n n o � A x x m m m x m T n NLLTT� ZTXX�Vi (n (n X A Z Qn p3 �► O O O O O D V o 4h. 0 CDC C. m m m cn 0 0 U 0 Ln 0 0 A A 0 W N N .a -N W W N W W W .A r r N 0 00 OD W W O O O O O O W C% CA 00 C a d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o. a W W W N N W 7 S N N N O W W ? W W W O ? N A z z z z z z z z z m f.N:r# V I V no M 00 :j � A r O = r n iCl N r r r r r r N N r Fes+ A 1p r r un 4, r r %D 00 CDC1 W u1 -N 01 O CH V r O� �o VI �D W m N Cn r O W V1 N t0 O W i0NW r W OWWr0rO%VN 00 PA m W Oo 00 00 10 W WV rip r N N$ z A A r N r r N N r N N N r V (l1 V l!1 N N N? r r r O A V1 VI 00 µ� c A g V N O.N U1 00 N r W OD o� O O r �p N V i-� OD io O O w r m N r O N VI w W T N s S 3 Ol V OWO N V W N N N [On V O (On OWD N N" all H 3 10 S [a Oi N 7 n 910 V A go r oo? o QID A «� k § C� § E t Q G G ■ k k k & 3 E 4 g 2 g _ ai & 0 CcGO A 0 0 0 0 2 I a E N k § � $ § § 7 C �g» _w4 0 ■ ■ � 0,■ § m O m w ■ 3 cup ��k vgFg 00 m � � & . � � E 3 g ■ z © N k§§ -—® ■ a ■ �; ,— � ■ z o ■ $ 00 tD / 30 el 14 @ ® ■ E CD w � d O o 0 -i v c z g W. OP r C A man �ia�im= 3 S �rtf o p BCD j j ? 9 � � � n Fi n � to u_ m m c c�� � co m m � m •� e_T m m 3= rD m Ot 3 c 3 m c g rD c a s 1 1 L i api a N N to `.,, y,l O N O1 N OD N O ? tOD r V N GVD D1 W t�l1 tN+ W N V NJ W N N O tD V `cn CA i+ to F+ Lnn %N0 %DD Ln r O O A CD Ot ? C. ? s� e aµ f. to N N N N li W zN Vn CD F+ O r w Ir O N V ? O V V V A v V OD W In O p v OVD W OVi N W In (n O, V v v a 01 O O Ul r0 10 W OV1 N yy w,7 14 �wYY 9c N N N F+ N N 1 as Fwjn iR to �!F Fes+ C ID N� O N O Ins {n r O N L. ? DND ? a V O O O V N tWD ? W W 0 ty '$ 0 µ s W W ►+ r' 77 4 O � O N O O b v V OD O V V 10 V NJ A An O V tD r C 01 Ql tD W N V W Ln V V O N N F+ O V O O O r W W W O NW,N a a O V oo0t+ NV~W N to .ryt N to V O � r C. to W W W a �rtp Oj3 N 0 m „ a a c c c c a O o 0 0 obi z o o y m 01 y N O = p�p, K `G rig f_p G 7 �, • N N A b Ol C (D ag ` ID C 01 . c m n 7 o sr � � m U2U� to m m id S n n n U3 T d 01 m ro m r� O1 _. >> 3 m m m m m m o m 01i 3 N 3 x (D n N CD fD � Q n G U 1 R a� ar �N ih Ln i/F Fes+ ? l/l W N F+ b O ? 4 W N Lq ~ O ? O� N N �p 1p b V Q+ po W m V 4 w o`+D 0 rn o 0 o c OD � w O W V co a� ar w w r r� H. W n F+ 01 NJ pD p1 F+ V O O ? O N b ~ OD O VI O� �6; A N w Obf W WV pi lOfl O D N w f+ DD W O JO N L" O O W OD N W V ? ww� Y 9 NO N 1 oo n fA N iR N W N ? W C1 V N O W� O VI Fp+p b in OD BOND O1 W O~D (!1 W F+ OD N w w ? N o Fb+ pOf O O O N O N W 0 aN b o 1 S O � � �11 7 ua A �. 30 G _l %- �"' atOD a w4A Ln o e w r°°i in v�i w o ww in w aoo cvo o cwo 0 0 o con coil o 0 o N rt fib Val 7 O �o -ao Dl v c z = v to d d c c c c a 0 m o 0 y YnliIr z ffH g '� SC 6i ry�� dEr I A A % K 3 D D D N oNi O 01 p S r • � � � o fn�1 �' �' � � v 1� a � oil .� obi n�i 1P < < < 3 S to to- 1 a Z S n n n m 01 T = g to m 3 2 i 3 2 to c 3' o is m � ; 2 e+ N c Q 0 i D 1 L 1 ae F+ 4h+ V f+ In N V I+ O ? tp r V In N Ln Ln iW w Ln Ln w {a Ln Ln c0°iN V O W s� aN VCD 0 Ln 0 Qom+ W i0 Of r Owi ►O.. V ON1 ? N Ln O Vf 4 J Ln OD ~ FV+ N VV N w.P CD e f+ O 10o OD ..4 W` 9 O ao�" N N Vl N coOD p1 O F+ ., co ? N V -bwW V N A µ 0�1 p� 01 V \ V i+ OD %0 N OI N�p C1 V �+ �-+ N O J! � COW O Ql �` In Ln l0 cn O` W O O O Ln N CC N N O w� CC w w r' w rn a � $ o~e Fes+ `• m O -N O N O O g v V N O V V ? N WN �+ Wo O+ O+ M0 W N 3 V O N N F+ O V O O O hV+ M ? OVD W Z 0 1 C y ad C 06 o ' w ? w t' ZO14 o Ln b L. Ol 10 NJ O V 0O� a C /y. (A 7 I N Sk 1.4 J O T m e -I oNi cNi c c c c a O -I -I �- C Z� -I 7 v Oi iti Yii �_ �, �• 01 ' 7 to to S' < g 7 � � �i � o � o, � d o � _ � � • D n � � pp7 m oL R 3 y n ID o� 5 C T d y 11 p L N yg�i y� m = �b r� fD C C I S allm n n n y m N fD fD Z 01 T d y 3 m OQt 1 3 RD O Q fD 02 3 o y m a g 0 u i a� In � V {ay f+ ►+ ins :'� � ~ W V O tW+ O N Q1 C. 1+ W NppI F+ O� OV1 In 001 Fb+ W N �+ W ? tN0 N A V In O n V ? {W!f O Oo t o ON1 00% a� dr NJ N �f W V ? �N ppct lz N r NJ IA V t+ ODD OD 0.�a N � b V lA - ? NJ V CD O OD O+ N 3 IC,? La• 00 W W CvOn O v 0`D O ppOpp v ONE W y 9 C d 1+ ' Vn b iR O Ell O FN+ O� N V O O yO N V INOf O iR G lA W 1+ i0 ? W N W ? O A ODOD 1+ ;1 (n Ln N FNJ N+ rGo O O O V W N FN+ WPit 1- F+ wYll •Y 1►. 3 a� N ,Q o m :' +�► " yt o+ co a+ rn w n, rn y Go F+ O ? hW+ r 1%0+ it COWWopVp N AOA coo in N ODD LnN O O W a O OD O� a LaS p y N A PIJ r N 0 N V F+ N N W Ln OD V O1 rt O V Fes+ .p e+ N W N V to Ln N ? OD N S p1 ? LnO F+ p C 3 �D .A tN+ m ' ° v m cn gn o -i c 190 z � -1 A c c ccn c cn7 m H 9 cfD A _ a 11' o d d a 3 a n> ID a v 1° rOD 7D fD iK 7d N S n n rsi .� g m .� I � c m m m m _ m 01 _3 A so o c V V o 3 2 Q n m o c; D n 4 u D. D D a� a� FA �v�i W w in w r o rn a°DD m cc v`Oi o � 0 ?? ac"'o a W O V ? V O W ? CD pp ? ? i+ O V N N C O C+ lOi1 O N? OWi a� Cc oN N u� i O N N N O N FW+ W V W V O W OD .W�pp f+ ? •A �+ W N OWi OWi to O CDi0 � b O tD ko M 1 V ,V r c�n W w W iA O iA N V r A O 00 V OEli 1-VVD I!1 °f V W N ? LO O O W i+ V n b V (OLnn O O O W N Ln O w V O N `Y 3 a NNJ hi a co O ow- � W N w ? N co ONO T N ? V d 00 O N Ln b W V C N O O A In OD Zo V N 1°DO Z 0*4 OI `Y W �Op N LA) ID O V 6 a V W N b? t�0 OD 00 l�l1 t0 ? ; PF ENO T N W ENO O \ ? O O O tOl1 woo V 0 W N 0 � H City of Beaumont Pass Transit FY 2018/2019 - FY 2020/2021 Table 2A- Excluded Routes Route Mode Service Type Route Description Date of ExemptionImplementation End Date Saturday only service servicing Cherry Valley, 3/4 FR Directly Operated Sports Park, community center, and commercial July 2016 June 2019 areas of Beaumont. Direct service from Beaumont Walmart to 125 FR DirectlyOperated p Calimesa, Mountain Grove Plaza, Kaiser August 2018 August 2021 Permanente Redlands Medical Offices and VA Ambulatory Care Center. rvute: cxciuoea routes are new routes or new service extensions that are eligible for exemption from the farebox recovery requirements. HUM $ § § % � a k K ! ! ■ ■ & a � . � `£ ; � _ - _ _ . . _ _ g . _ � � _ _ ■ \ ■ 4 R p § w �■ � k FO . . ■ e a { \ \ / \ \ • ` § § § § § § § § • � � ■ � k - # a E■ % Ire # { # \ J £ ! § % § � & w , _ _ 1 Q �� k ��! a�% a�� k a k a ���� $ i �� i�� a � 9 - \ . �� & )()p�j�b�e����a I a# 7## p I �f$ R$ m�; m�% 13 a�� ��E / \ � j / { { � � �� �%�� ) ())) k)) �� \ �� � �% a� p# B s�% s w e e g n a���� g ) { W \ { m 7 ��f } 9 IN \ } \ � �% \ \ \��'| ul �| = a :R 17U4 �� �% �� 4 W _ 4 . m , �� �% �� �� �� � 7 g � � g K � 0 Q City of Beaumont Pass Transit FY 2018/2019 Table 3A- Individual Route Descriptions and Area Serviced Route Description Area/Sites Serviced Trunk Route on major arterial Areas of interest include Beaumont downtown commercial roads of Beaumont Ave, 6th area and 2nd Street Marketplace, including banks and grocery 2 Street as well Ra msey amsey St into stores. Also services Walmart transportation hub, San Cabazon Gorgonio Hospital, social services, DMV, Outlet Malls and Casino Morongo Cherry Valley via Sundance to Services schools such as elementary, middle and high school, 3 Walmart deviations into rural Cherry Valley, 2nd Street Marketplace and connection opportunity with Walmart transportation hub Downtown Beaumont via Services community center, elementary, middle schools, high 4 residential school, library, sports park, 2nd Street Marketplace and Walmart transportation hub 7 Northwest Beaumont Middle schools and high school, Fairway Canyon and Tournament Hills. 9 South Beaumont Middle schools and high school, Seneca Springs 3/4 Combination of Routes 3 and 4 Saturday only service servicing Cherry Valley, Sports Park, community center, and commercial areas of Beaumont. 120 Commuter Service to San Direct service from Beaumont Walmart to Calimesa and San Bernardino Bernardino Transit Center. Direct service from Beaumont Walmart to Calimesa, Mountain Commuter Service to VA 125 Ambulatory Care Center Grove Plaza, Kaiser Permanente Redlands Medical Offices and VA Ambulatory Care Center. Curb to Curb Direct Service for Citywide service for those qualified passengers living 3/4 of a DAR qualified residents of Beaumont mile of fixed route service in Beaumont and Cherry Valley to and parts of Cherry Valley Beaumont, Cherry Valley and parts of Banning. 0 0 z D \ \ 2 ) \ CD § N K a k m } k � / \ © ° @ / ° 7 ° k # _( § � k C 2 / J ( s � ¢ 9 a ' « ® E n 0 ; E 2 0 & 2 o M _ E ° � / E I J $ » (ƒ/ cr k § k § mCD 0k ƒ \ \ CL k \ \ / \ p �\ � co 8 8 8 8 ® 2 a o 0 0 0 $� � � h / n S 00 o © ClA co 4 _ _ enq o a o S o 8 o _ C) « e % � \ 00 S ■ /J o■ ■ 4A In 169 j - ca co © CDe c $ca 2 _ � � « A « ° p # q ( $ ~ o C. 0 o S 40 ■ - v cr F a @ � ] ] ■ Q % In c � CL ■ M � c ■ ■ # CL 0 � In � 0 co � co Table 4A- Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER If existing roiect in FTIP indicate FTIP ID Number SRTP Project No: 2019-01 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: CNG Station Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CNG refueling station project to bring a CNG station to Beaumont area off of the 1-10 where public transit, as well as other vehicles, could easily fuel from a predetermined site. CNG Feasibility Study is underway to determine which of two sites is the most beneficial to the Transit Agency as well as for public use. CNG Feasibility study should be completed by end of calendar year 2018. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The only public CNG facility in the Pass area is owned and operated by the City of Banning, whose facility is in need of renovation and repair. A second CNG facility exists; however, it is privately used by Beaumont Unified School District and not opened to the public. The nearest facility outside the Pass area is Hemet, which is 22 miles one-way. The total project cost is estimated at $1.4 million for a full -service facility capable of providing CNG fuel for both public users and slow -fill stations for public transportation agencies in the area. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date Current I December 2019 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year STA 18-19 Total Amount $300,000 $300,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT#, FTIP ID# AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #1 FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # 14-1 Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/17) N/A N/A CNG Station Improvements CNG Station Improvements 85,737.91 300,000 15-3 16-1 CNG Station Improvements 300,000 18-1 CNG Station Improvements 300,000 Table 4A- Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing proiect in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID Number): SRTP Project No: 2019-02 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Type H EZ Rider II Vehicle PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Procurement of Near Zero Emission Type H EZ Rider II Vehicle PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Expansion vehicle to be used for Commuter Link 125 PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date July 2018 September 2019 1 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED : Fund Type STA MSRC Grant Total Fiscal Year 18-19 17-18 Amount $175,000 $25,000 $200,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT# FTIP ID# AND RCTC'S SUP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Description Unexpended Project # Balance l (as of 6/30/17 N/A N/A 17-3 1 Type E & 1 Type C Bus $319,776.02 w/ Cameras for Expansion N/A N/A 15-1 2 Type 7 Bus for $14,906.36 Replacement/Expansion Table 4A- Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID Number): SUP Project No: 2019-03 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Near Zero Emission Vehicle- MSRC PROJECT DESCRIPTION: MSRC Grant to help with the procurement of Near Zero Emission Type H EZ Rider II Vehicle PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Expansion vehicle to be used for new Commuter Link 125 PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date July 2018 September 2019 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED]: Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount MSRC Grant 17-18 18-19 $25,000 $175,000 $200,000 STA Total PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT#, FTIP ID# AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) :TC/SRTP roject # 17-3 Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/17) 1 Type E & 1 Type C Bus $319,776.02 w/ Cameras for Expansion 15-1 ! 2 Type 7 Bus for $14,906.36 Replacement/Expansion Table 4A- Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existinj uroiect in FTIP, indicate _FTIP ID Number): SUP Project No: 2019-04 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Modernization of Maintenance Facility PROJECT DESCRIPTION: State of Good Repair (SGR) grant for the modernization of vehicle maintenance facility. Metal structure is proposed to be installed, after demolition of current unreinforced masonry carport structures, for the use of mechanics to inspect and service vehicles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Vehicle Mechanics currently conduct inspections and service vehicles in the elements, unprotected from the weather. This structure will allow for the inspection and maintenance of the vehicles protected from weather. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date September 2018 September 2019 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount SGR Grant 18-19 $85,254 Total $85,254 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT# FTIP lD# AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT # FTA Grant # FTIP ID # N/A N/A RCTC/SRTP Description Project # Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/17) 17-4 Shop Building $75,000 Maintenance N 3 3 m Q m o <. n N -n CD -< CL N O W N 0 OD T .�► Ct y o m = m m O w O c N 3 a � .a m @ a m cD m CD W C CD __ " N m n �. "J CD m ^ C 3 cc, CD0 O o — 01 M. fp Z 0 0 m b b ER to 5i D 3 W o W N N Nam+. 0 OCA) O O O O O j C.) O W O O W W a (Op N o O O W 10 A N � T 8 W N o N Ao OD w co W CD O A O 40 N L D O o 0 0 O o C.0 0 0 if9 h N O 0 A H4 44 T a W 1 cn CD n o � � H N O n � � O O � ca co W to m co ER "' D' A N Oi N A m N X cn N N A- A A Efl � as I S N Table 5.1- Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing pro'ect in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID Number): SRTP Project No: 2020-01 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Type H EZ Rider II Vehicle PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Procurement of Near Zero Emission Type H EZ Rider II Vehicle PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Replacement Vehicle for transit fleet. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date September 2019 September 2020 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED : Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA 19-20 $550,000 Total $550,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT# FTIP ID# AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Description Unexpended Project # Balance (as of 6/30/17) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Table 5.1- Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (if existing rolect in FTIP. indicate FTIP ID Number SRTP Project No: 2020-02 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Bus Stop Upgrades PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Updating of Bus Stop signs and schedules throughout the system. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Beaumont Pass Transit has not upgraded bus stop signs and schedule holders for nearly 10 years. This project will enhance the appearance and draw attention to the transit system which in turn will promote use. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date 1 July 2019 J December 2020 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type j STA Total Fiscal Year 19-20 Amount $100,000 $100,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT# FTIP ID# AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #j FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Description Unexpended Project # Balance (as of 6/30/17) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A o ` f ( \ CD CD \ CD> m 2 a 0 2� a x CDCD CD \ \ / / :3 o J - r o g 0 2 72 ■ J (/e / \ #ki ( P o� D. C \ \ j } _- 7 Q S § � & ' % D _- o � ) \ k k \ 0 _- ) m . / ' . f _- o 0 K) % � _§ B' w co _- & '3 . - � k _ -10 g � E � m\ }\;\ @0 = ;u \D Table 5.2- Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER {If existing ❑roiect in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID Number : SRTP Project No: 2021-01 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Type H EZ Rider II Vehicle PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Procurement of Near Zero Emission Type H EZ Rider II Vehicle PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Replacement vehicle for our aging fleet. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date July 2020 June 2021 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type _ Fiscal Year STA 20-21 Total Amount $550,000 $550,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT# FTIP ID# AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Description Unexpended Project # Balance (as of 6/30/17) I N/A I N/A I N/A I N/A f N/A Table 5.2- Capital Pro'ect Justification PROJECT NUMBER [If existing project in FTIP. indicate FTIP ID Number]: SUP Project No: 2021-02 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Vehicle Amenities PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase and install automated bus stop announcements and upgrade security camera system. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Most vehicles do not have automated announcements as required by ADA, this project will install system to announce as required. Additionally, security camera system will be near its warranty expiration. It is time to start planning for an upgraded system. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date July 2020 September 2022 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): i Fund Type STA Fiscal Year I Amount _____i20-21 Total $550,000 $550,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT# FTIP ID# AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT # FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Description Unexpended Project # Balance (as of 6/30/17) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A City of Beaumont Pass Transit FY 2018/2019 - FY 2020/2021 Table 6- Progress to Implement Triennial Performance Audit Audit Recommendations (Covering FY 2012/13-2014/15 Action(s) Taken and Results Beaumont continues to strive for timely Continue to ensure the timely completion and completion of SCO reports. New software has submittal of the annual State Controller Transit been purchased and migration into it complete. Operators Financial Transactions Reports. Additional staff in the Finance Department has been added to prevent delays. Prepare and submit separate State Controller Transit Operators Financial Transactions Reports Separate documents have been prepared and for general public transit and specialized service. submited. Mt San Jacinto and RTA were approached. With Work with Riverside Transit Agency and Mt San no solution available to share fare revenue, Jacinto College on fare revenue reimbursement Beaumont Pass Transit has applied for a grant to from the college GoPass Revenue Agreement. transport college students aside from the Go Pass program Track ridership trends for those using mobility Passengers using mobility devices are being devices. tracked. ^' Z �Zp O O O O O d 7 C O m o a (oyp�i 1(0�1i c c c c a y f/1 N 4�1 s C ID O 1 D D (D f fY W x 3 7 7 a 3 _ Z 5, 6 9 m m v v v >D ul vZ i A �' O <<< =r S m 7d 7 n 0.: m' 3 c' oNi T O7 n (D 2 m 6 m U p ICD ' n ,l� C o o 3= p 3= o m c �; (R � 7 3 c R 5 n S 0 r V r 00 N NJCA N N O b W r C N C W V li N �ON1 O kc N NJN ? In O? OND ?? V O o W �O b ? W W W O ? O b O a V OVi N v v II v v II II II 0 v � W V ►+ V V IA W O W (Nfl V W W d Go 9-01 >> a A n 0. v 0. y u n AII I C OI' O iA V iR -W O O 00 ? CO N %D N O w W V W V b V O e 1 y too r a� � iq d Q A at O, O O N V O V W PO O W N , 3 3 y y� y� fig 41 N N N O V N N Er O 3 3 d 3 3 of H R (a U3 ta R R ID � IC m v a� d r� d' m g ;so M 7� 1,i, D) N 7 [to N 'oh a m m L 3 3 n �N1 QI NN N i> m 0 C 9 m 3 C N m ; ; c C N < m �° 3 m C N < ID � 1 N fQ�D' O ; P 5. �O f�D 0_,J' YD��'i 7 U, f DO (D to m c m 3 ID O CJ Jc m `m c O @ g d �ij m M O m O �i' 3 ($ ryw K fD 3 --I fJ 0 C m _ N �ii fD � tip•D DvJ 4 fD o M 9 3 !D 7 a '* 3 D D 4 M a a N � o �J �,► a r O V ~vO ~ O N IJ V ?F, 1 VO /n O v O ? G v OV N Vn OVD wWmN C i D � w �a 7 N gC P. C. +� +�+ �- b► v► .I to •. .1 $ W W � V v � 01 r J r O OD fR ? O O i, N F+ O O V ►+ J+ iN VI UD O O to V N V V N W N V Vn 1 cc J V J O N N r p00 O e W O N t0 01 V J+ ? V 00 w W O W O C N N OD W r co OD � N 9 O I N N N 01 Uf Ln r-j r W F+ i+ N O W fPr ODD i/F i!F 10 V O `Ln Q1 J+ Ir V Fes+ N 1D In { 0% J+ O V 10/i O t�O e O O O 01 �D N }O�ff, O t00 W W W IVJI O IWJI O O O N 10 A W v II v 11 v 11 v II v II v II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O t0 VI � N tom+ > fD > fD > A fD N N m m N N m N m ? O W W N = n :) A %D 11 11 11 a A = a n = a N o e+ 1 1 0`r0 o ? c a ''` a r m d R' 3 8 � m 1 R a� 70 c J'! dl Q F Go Beaumont Transit FY 2017/2018- FY 2020/2021 Short Range Transit Plan Table 9 Highlights of SUP • Launch new Commuter Link 125 to connect Pass Area with Redlands. • Increase marketing and community outreach with social media, attend community events, and conduct rider appreciation days. • Free Fare Project as part of LCTOP grant. Vouchers for passengers such as Veterans, and college students among others, as well as on rider appreciation days. • Continue to explore fare media outlets to give access to purchase multi use passes for passengers. • Maintain and improve GPS tracking system and Google Transit to assist passengers with trip planning. • Increase system wide visibility, reliability and productivity by analyzing each route individually and as a whole. • Sustain current cooperative agreements with partnering agencies and explore new agreement possibilities. • Conduct a Comprehensive Operations Analysis in conjunction with, but independently of Banning Pass Transit. • Promotion of a beach train travel training opportunity for youth in the Pass Area • Explore the possibilities of and create golf cart program within the gated active adult communities. Table 9A-Operating and Ca vital Data Operating and Financial FY 15/16 Date Audited FY 16/17 Pending Audit System wide Ridership 213,551 196,377 Operating Costs per $78.99 $83.06 Revenue Hour Table 913- Fare Revenue Calculation (Consistent with Commission Recovery Policy) Revenue Source FY 15/16 FY 16/17 included in Farebox Audited (Pending Audit) Calculation 1. Passenger Fares 1 226,051 219,522 2. Interest 11,631 5,143 FY 17/18 Estimate based from 3Q actuals $90.67 FY 18/19 Planned 242,743 92.91 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 (Through 3Q (Plan) Estimate) 234,772 267,093 4,227 0 3. General Fund 0 0 0 0 Supplement 4. Measure A 0 0 0 0 5. Advertising 0 0 0 0 Revenue 6. Gain on Sale of 0 0 0 0 Capital Assets 7. CNG Revenue 0 0 0 0 8. Lease/Other 0 0 0 0 Revenue 9. Federal Excise 0 0 0 0 Tax Refund 10.Investment 0 0 0 0 Income 11. CalPers CERBT 0 0 0 12. Fare Revenue 0 0 _0 0 0 from Exempt Routes 0 227,682 0 224,665 0 238,999 0 267,093 13. Other Revenues TOTAL REVENUE For Farebox Calculation (1- 13) 2,478,621 2,406,572 2,302,153 2,670,933 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES For Farebox Calculation 10.89% 10.72% 10.76% 10.00% Farebox Recovery Ratio FINAL DRAFT RCTC Rail Short Range FY 2018/19 - Final 5/18/2018 rjo *ism Transit Plan 2020/21 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 — SYSTEM OVERVIEW...................................................................1 1.1 Description of Service Area....................................................................1 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections....................................2 1.3 Fixed Route Services..............................................................................2 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure .............................2 1.5 Revenue Fleet........................................................................................5 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities..........................................................5 1.7 Existing Coordination Between Transit Agencies...................................9 CHAPTER 2 — EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE...............10 2.1 Fixed Route Service — Route by Route Analysis..................................10 2.2 Dial -A -Ride Service — System Performance.........................................12 2.3 Key Performance Indicators.................................................................14 2.4 Productivity Improvement Efforts..........................................................15 2.5 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth Over Next Two Years .... 16 2.6 Equipment, Passenger Amenities, and Facility Needs .........................17 CHAPTER 3 — PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION .....20 3.1 Recent Service Changes......................................................................20 3.2 Recommended Service Changes and Modifications ............................20 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotion............................................................21 3.4 Budget Impact on Proposed Changes..................................................23 CHAPTER 4 — FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS..........................................24 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget..............................................................24 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program ..24 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements..........................................24 Table 1 — Fleet Inventory..................................................................................26 Table 2 — SRTP Service Summary...................................................................26 Table 2A — Summary of Routes to Be Excluded in FY 2018119.....................26 Table 3 — SRTP Route Statistics......................................................................26 Table 3A — Individual Route Descriptions......................................................26 Table 4 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2018/19...............................27 Table 5.1 — Summary of Funds Requested in FY 2019/20 .............................29 ............................................................................................................................ 29 Table 5.1A— Capital Project Justification.......................................................29 Table 5.2 — Summary of Funds Requested in FY 2020/21 .............................30 Table 5.2A— Capital Project Justification.......................................................30 Table 6 — Update Actions Taken or To Be Implemented to Comply with the Most Recent Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations .....................31 Table 7 — Service Provider Performance Target Report................................31 Table 8 — FY 2018119 SRTP Performance Report...........................................31 Table 9A— Highlights of FY 18/19 SRTP.........................................................31 GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS BNSF BNSF Railways CETAP Community & Environmental Acceptability Process CMAQ Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Funds CVAG Coachella Valley Association of Governments FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration IEOC Inland Empire -Orange County Line LAUS Los Angeles Union Station LOSSAN Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency LTF Local Transportation Funds Metro Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority MOW Maintenance -of -Way NTD National Transit Database OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority PTC Positive Train Control PVL Perris Valley Line RCTC Riverside County Transportation Commission RTA Riverside Transit Agency RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Program SB Senate Bill SBCTA San Bernardino County Transportation Authority SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCRRA Southern California Regional Rail Authority SJBL San Jacinto Branch Line SR State Route SRTP Short Range Transit Plan STA State Transit Assistance Funds STIP State Transportation Improvement Program TVM Ticket Vending Machine UP Union Pacific Railroad VCTC Ventura County Transportation Commission RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CHAPTER 1 — SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.1 Description of Service Area RCTC is a member of the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) Joint Powers Authority (JPA) that operates the Metrolink commuter rail system. Three Metrolink lines serve Riverside County: ■ The Inland Empire -Orange County (IEOC) Line ■ The Riverside Line ■ The 91 /Perris Valley (91 /PV) Line Pohndalep METROLINK COMMUTER RAIL SYSTEM Vincent c,oI•IAdon 6 1 Sn bl C16ril.0 li=:• ❑rd[�ELCS Newholl • Srhmrl5an F­dv • ,� Va11 17 " Nor = -- RAf•i�:F k1•Ileyiu �4J1 METROLINK r•r pw.. VJl.r•1.. s r swi�•s....J 6, Capi�uona r.a S.. Er.nda l:w + wF Mnwr9w Nmno Cmw,• lir -- . — Cme.r r •l�P.rwY�•lir Lr.-,iws�rxy, z.F. u cti...�wbr.-ra. ni1iOideM1�°""" SUP NOT TO SUU R Ile Rirorsid eNu 1•r Pork/11CR G wnfown • +r *" a VuAeyl t. rl idr f[M1arch FI.1d La 5iorro VIVLR�I]L Ci � ■Percis-Gaeyawn P." I� 1 :Ard 0I[GO CO. .v On June 6, 2016, RCTC began service on the 24-mile extension of the Metrolink 91-Line from the Riverside — Downtown Station, through the Perris Valley to the city of Perris in western Riverside County (now rebranded as the 91/Perris Valley Line). RCTC owns and maintains nine of the 57 Metrolink stations, which are located in Western Riverside County. Four of these stations are part of the 91/Perris Valley Line extension. ■ Corona —West RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 — 2020/21 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ■ Corona — North Main ■ Riverside — La Sierra ■ Riverside — Downtown ■ Jurupa Valley/Pedley ■ 91/PV Line Extension Stations ■ Riverside — Hunter Park/UCR ■ Moreno Valley/March Field ■ Perris — Downtown ■ Perris — South 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections Whether traveling to work, school, or one of Southern California's great recreational destinations, Metrolink trains provide a viable alternative to driving alone. Every day, thousands of Southern California residents park their cars and choose Metrolink to commute. The average Metrolink commute from Riverside County is 37 miles. Metrolink trains are also popular with schools throughout the region both transporting students to classes and for field trips. The Metrolink rider profiles are updated on a regular basis. The following is the latest socio-economic data included in the Metrolink FY2018/19 Budget Workshop: Line Riverside Line IEOC Line 91/PV Line Ethnicity: Black 13% 9% 21 % Hispanic 34% 44% 34% Asian 30% 8% 13% Caucasian (non- 19% 33% 27% Hispanic) 4% 6% 6% Other Income Less than $20,000 5% 4.9% 9.7% $20,000 - $49,999 16.8% 23% 17% $50,000 - $74,999 23.6% 24.8% 19.2% $75,000 - $99,999 17.8% 16% 14.3% $100,000 - $149,999 20.5% 19.4% 19.6% $150,000 - $199,999 9.9% 8.2% 11.4% $200,000 or more 6.5% 3.8% 8.7% 1.3 Fixed Route Services Metrolink regularly operates Monday through Friday. Weekend service operates on a reduced frequency on the IEOC and 91/PV lines. Metrolink will run a Sunday schedule on the days that New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day are observed. 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure Metrolink ticket prices are distance -based and calculated on the shortest driving miles between stations. Each station combination is uniquely priced, based on driving miles from one station to the other. A ride from Downtown Riverside to Los Angeles Union Station is a 59-mile one-way trip; a ride from Downtown Riverside to Irvine is a 40-mile trip. The distance charge is currently capped at 80 miles. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION This system -wide pricing program offers a fair and equitable pricing policy. Over time, Metrolink customers traveling the same distances will pay the same price, and short trips will cost less than longer trips. Metrolink is responsible for any Title VI issues related to fare structure and pricing. The Metrolink ticket price consists of three elements: a base boarding charge, an additional increment related to the number of miles traveled, and finally a modest increment to permit Metrolink passengers to transfer without requiring an additional fare on selected connecting transit operators and a reduced rate on others. Ticket Types There are three types of single -day use Metrolink tickets (One -Way, Round -Trip, and $10 Weekend Day) and two types of multi -day use Metrolink tickets (7-Day and Monthly). One -Way Tickets One-way tickets are valid for one trip only, defined as continuous ME-M❑UNK. travel away from the origin station to the destination station specified M LAWAI pENoL on the ticket. The trip must begin on the date and prior to expiration sm P 1s JUI12 s2o time printed on the front of the ticket. One-way trips must be ; qn,R, completed within three hours from the time of purchase of ticket. The expiration time and date is displayed on the ticket.�� Round -Trip Tickets Round -Trip tickets are valid for two trips only, between the origin station and the destination station marked on the ticket. The first leg of a Round -Trip ticket is valid for three hours from purchase. The return ticket is valid for travel anytime on the same day as the first leg of the trip. $10 Weekend Day Pass Metrolink offers the Weekend Day Pass for only $10 per person. This pass is good for unlimited systemwide travel on either Saturday or Sunday only and expires at 3 A.M. following the date of purchase. The Weekend Day Pass is accepted for free transfers to connecting transit services, except Amtrak. Holiday Service Metrolink is proposing to run Sunday weekend service on holidays in FY2018-19 and offer a $10 day pass fare. 7-Day Pass Valid for unlimited travel during a consecutive seven-day period between station pairs starting on the day when the pass is purchased. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Monthly Pass �M..oLirvx F ly Monthly Passes are valid for unlimited travel between the origin and TAUS •in41 FJNJ destination stations printed on the pass during the calendar month printed �I AUG12 53c �n on the pass. Monthly Passes are also valid for unlimited systemwide travel after 7:00 p.m. on Friday until 11:59 p.m. Sunday. Multi -Line Option Some Metrolink tickets can be used on more than one line. Tickets for either the San Bernardino Line or Riverside Line are valid for travel between stations of equal or lesser distance on either line. Tickets on the Riverside Line, the 91/PV Line, or the IEOC Line are valid for travel between stations of equal or lesser distance on any of these routes if the origin or destination station is in Riverside County or San Bernardino County. There is discussion of a special discounted San Bernardino Line Promotion, these tickets would not be allowed to be used on the Riverside of 91/PV Line. Ticket Purchase Options Metrolink offers multiple options for purchasing tickets. Tickets and passes can be purchased from the self -serve ticket vending machines (TVMs) found at all Metrolink stations using payment cards or cash. Tickets can also be purchased via the Metrolink app, available on both Apple and Android devices. The Metrolink app only accepts payment cards and the ticket is scanned directly from your device. Lesser -used ticket purchase options include ticket outlets and Pass By Mail. Ticket outlets are available in various locations, but only available at LAUS for Riverside Metrolink lines. Two ticket windows at LAUS offer all ticket types as well as the option to purchase tickets with a personal check or TransitCheck. Pass By Mail forms must be received by the 15th of the month to receive a pass by the 1 st of the following month. Advance Purchase Ticket Paper One -Way or Round -Trip tickets for a future date can be purchased up to one year in advance from a TVM. The Advance Purchase Ticket will not have an expiration time printed on it and can be used at any time on the day you chose to travel. Discounted Fares Everyday Discounts Student/Youth: 25% off Monthly Pass, 7-Day Pass, One -Way and Round -Trip tickets. Youths are ages 6 to 18. Students must present valid Student ID to the fare inspector upon request. Child: Three children (ages 5 and under) ride free with an adult using a valid ticket - each additional child pays youth fare. Senior / Disabled / Medicare: 25% off Monthly Pass and 7-Day Pass. 50% off One -Way and Round -Trip tickets. Seniors qualify for discount is age is 65 or over. Disabled or Medicare discount applies if you have the appropriate identification. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Active Military: 10% off One -Way and Round -Trip tickets. Discount for the 91/PV Line The SCRRA Board approved a new set of 91/PV Line discounts to encourage ridership from the new stations. This discount is offered for trips connecting to stations outside of Riverside County or for trips connecting to stations within Riverside County. Fares connecting the 91/PV Line Extension stations to stations outside of Riverside County will be sold as though Riverside — Downtown is the origin or destination. For example, a trip between Perris — South and LAUS will be the same cost as a trip between Riverside — Downtown and LAUS. Fares connecting the 91/PV Line Extension stations to stations within Riverside County will be discounted 25%. Proposed Fare Structure Since Metrolink began operations in 1992, fares have varied year to year. With the decline in nationwide ridership, Metrolink fares have remained stable in retaining ridership. The table below shows how fares have changed from fiscal year (FY) 2005 to 2018: 4% 4.5% I 5.5% 3.5% 5.5% 3% 6% 0% 7% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% The Metrolink 10-Year Strategic Plan 2015-2025 addresses fares as part of their Goal 2 to achieve fiscal sustainability. The strategy of increasing fare revenues is to be done by reducing fare evasion rates and increasing ticket sales, but not by increasing ticket fare prices. Fare increases are not being proposed as part of the FY18-19 Metrolink budget. 1.5 Revenue Fleet Metrolink has 39 revenue train sets in operation'. The Metrolink fleet is composed of 55 locomotives (including 3 expansion locomotives) and 258 passenger cars (90 cab cars and 168 coach cars)2. Metrolink is in the process of upgrading its fleet of locomotives to operate new locomotives with Tier 4 clean technology. 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities In planning for a successful commuter rail program in Western Riverside County, RCTC acquired properties for current and future passenger rail service. Source: Metrolink 10-Year Strategic Plan 2015-2025 Technical Appendix Source: Draft Metrolink Transit Asset Management Plan (May 2016) RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Commuter Rail Station Management Unlike the other SCRRA member agencies, the Commission owns and operates nine rail stations serving Riverside County: ■ Corona — West ■ Corona — North Main ■ Riverside — La Sierra ■ Riverside — Downtown ■ Jurupa Valley/Pedley ■ Riverside — Hunter Park/UCR ■ Moreno Valley/March Field ■ Perris — Downtown ■ Perris — South Station operation and maintenance costs are included in the rail program budget with services coordinated by the Commission's staff. Parking is currently free at the stations. The FY 2018-19 proposed operating budget member subsidy for RCTC is $8.5M in revenue and $28.2 in expenses for a total net subsidy of $19.7M. This is a 11% increase from the FY18 Operating Subsidy. Santa Fe Railroad's San Jacinto Branch Line The Measure A program provides for Riverside County's participation in the creation of a regional commuter rail system. Though the primary goal was to provide service from Riverside to Los Angeles and Orange counties, the Measure A map included a possible internal element along the former Santa Fe Railroad's San Jacinto Branch Line (SJBL). The SJBL corridor extends 38.3 miles between Highgrove and Hemet within Riverside County. The alignment roughly follows the Interstate 215 to Perris where it veers east, parallel to State Route 74 to Hemet and San Jacinto. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION San Jacinto Branch Lino -;a 6EFxM1P7.1: COI111TY r:csib: caUxr�,s xl 9 WNI a .law s.,.� AIYIrAS1O@ 'MORENO "•. ,�„� VALLEY BEAl Will Will � 1yS 5AN JQNTG P 15 � r r i - �++++++++►+�++ SAN J UNTO BRANCH LINE' uR R HEME" CaFirOH LAKE ialnard Valley Rovrralake As part of the regional acquisition of BNSF Railway (BNSF) properties and use rights, RCTC purchased the 38-mile SJBL and adjacent properties in 1993 for $26 million using Western County Rail Measure A and state rail bonds (Prop 108 of 1990). BNSF retained exclusive freight operating rights, serving its customers along the line and maintaining the right-of-way until such time as passenger service is implemented. Planned Facilities New facilities are not planned in the short-term. Facility and infrastructure improvements are currently being studied to accommodate mid- and long-term service growth, including the expansion of the Riverside — Downtown Station and the Moreno Valley/March Field Station. The Riverside -Downtown Station Track and Platform Project is necessary in the mid-term to accommodate connectivity and increase rail capacity and service reliability. This project will add a center platform and associated tracks on the south side of the station, and extend the existing RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 — 2020/21 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION pedestrian bridge with an elevator to the new platform, effectively doubling passenger train capacity of the station. The Moreno Valley/March Field Station Upgrade Project is also necessary in the mid-term. This project will upgrade the station with an additional platform and a pedestrian overpass and rehabilitate the initial 2.7 miles of a double -track corridor that will eventually extend to Control Point (CP) Nuevo, for a total of about nine miles. This project will provide the capacity necessary for additional connectivity from 91/PV Line trains to other trains in the Metrolink system at the Riverside — Downtown Station. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1.7 Existing Coordination Between Transit Agencies Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) Rail Corridor Agency The LOSSAN Rail Corridor is a 351-mile corridor between San Diego and San Luis Obispo and is the second busiest intercity passenger rail corridor in the nation supporting commuter, intercity, and freight rail services. The LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency is a Joint Powers Board established in 1989 to provide a forum for the transportation and regional agencies along the Corridor, including RCTC, to collaborate on ways to increase ridership, revenue, capacity, reliability, and safety on the LOSSAN Rail Corridor. In July of 2015, the Caltrans executed an Interagency Transfer Agreement (ITA) with the LOSSAN Joint Powers Authority (JPA) and officially transferred the administration and management of the Surfliner service to the LOSSAN JPA. The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) became the Managing Agency for the LOSSAN Agency. The LOSSAN Agency continued its vision for the Corridor that focuses on: a1-Roder SAtauad- msano Marle • Lompu ®Sdeanq L055AN Rail Corridor � IMerclryRall- NdficSu"` 0.asAnptles-S.n Ulrpe. ran lub Pbupgl CanMmnp Cm t'V Light Rail Spvlm IlndufhAq Iuwre} NsoM uipb4pwi Train SrNu y pt nr Bm nk Connvms AMEUS Commuter Rnl"It" . InteNhknd�or Cammuterhwlsmm�s 0 NUMhallitabom Nwrrurk Moapal[ ' o.n.rt Imr Velleyr. Url Ir .r kmxlkp Van Nrry hurbmk Mrpprr -Ub Nppk Akpmi Glr dr , LM.kngdw UngnSlal�'\. -..\. r,�t Aar,a, S.M. Am Ij . ""C+pnrmo ran Cgmkme ' Grkamlda lrmrlt Ce Sane B—h ■ Expanding and enhancing the integration of the Corridor's passenger rail services ■ Identifying a Corridorwide capital improvement program ■ Enhancing local transit connections at both commuter and intercity stations ■ Developing an integrated fare policy ■ Providing better customer information The LOSSAN Rail Corridor Agency does not pay for the operation of any of the passenger rail services within the corridor, but it is a means to help coordinate operations and planning. RCTC has been an active ex-officio member since 2011 and in 2014. With a revised Joint Powers Authority Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), RCTC is now a full voting member. RCTC is involved in the development of rail service in Southern California. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 — 2020/21 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CHAPTER 2 — EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 2.1 Fixed Route Service — Route by Route Analysis The SCRRA operates seven commuter rail lines. As described in the previous chapter, three routes, the Riverside, 91/PV, and Inland IEOC Lines directly serve Western Riverside County. IEOC Line This line extends 100.1 miles between the City of San Bernardino, in San Bernardino County, and the cities of Irvine and San Juan Capistrano, in Orange County, with limited extensions to Oceanside. The alignment roughly follows the Riverside Freeway (SR91) along the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) San Bernardino Subdivision in Riverside and Orange County. This commuter rail service to Orange County provides a transportation alternative in one of the busiest corridors in Southern California. The Line is a jointly funded project of the RCTC, SBCTA, and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). When the service began in October 1995, it was the first suburb -to -suburb commuter rail line in the country. One station in San Bernardino County, four stations within Riverside County, eight stations within Orange County, and one station in San Diego County now serve the line. As of July 2016, the line operates 16 trains Monday through Friday, including five peak period roundtrips. Each train travels between the Riverside — Downtown Station and the Irvine Station, with a few trains originating and/or terminating at the San Bernardino — Downtown Station, the Laguna Niguel/Mission Viejo Station, or the Oceanside Station. IEOC weekend service began on July 15, 2006. This route was modeled after the successful RCTC-chartered Beach Trains. The service includes two roundtri s leavin from San Bernardino IEOC Line Line Opening: October 1995 Route miles: 100.1 Avg Trip Length (miles): 33.8 Weekday Daily Trains: 16 Current Stations Served: San Bernardino — Downtown 599 W. Rialto Ave San Bernardino 1204 West 3'd St Riverside — Downtown 4066 Vine St Riverside — La Sierra 10901 Indiana Ave Corona — North Main 250 E Blaine St Corona — West 155 S Auto Center Dr Anaheim Canyon 1039 N Pacificenter Dr Orange 194 N Atchison St Santa Ana 1000 E Santa Ana Blvd Tustin 2975 Edinger Ave Irvine 15215 Barranca Pkwy Laguna Niguel/Mission Viejo 28200 Forbes Rd San Juan Capistrano 26701 Verdugo St San Clemente 1850 Avenida Estacion San Clemente Pier* Avenida del Mar Oceanside 235 S Tremont Ave p g to Oceanside in the morning and returning in the afternoon on Saturday and Sunday. The trains make all IEOC stops, plus the San Clemente Pier. The current running time between Riverside — Downtown and Irvine is approximately 68 minutes. RTA, SunLine, and the Corona Cruiser provide connecting transit service. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 10 Riverside Line This line extends 59.1 miles between the city of Riverside and LAUS along the Union Pacific (UP) Railroad alignment. The route roughly follows the Pomona Freeway corridor (SR60) through the cities and communities of Pedley, Mira Loma, Ontario, Pomona, Walnut, Industry, La Puente, Montebello, and Commerce. Existing stations include Riverside — Downtown, Jurupa Valley/Pedley, Ontario — East, Pomona — Downtown, Industry, Montebello/Commerce, and LAUS. RCTC, the San Bernardino Transportation Authority (SBCTA), and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) jointly fund the line. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Riverside Line Line Opening: June 1993 Route miles: 59.1 Avg Trip Length (miles): 39.3 Weekday Daily Trains: 12 Current Stations Served Riverside — Downtown 4066 Vine St Jurupa Valley/Pedley 6001 Pedley Ontario — East 3330 E Francis St Pomona — Downtown 101 N Main Street Industry 600 S Brea Canyon Rd Montebello/Commerce 2000 Flotilla St LA Union Station 800 N Alameda St The Riverside Line offers 12 weekday trains between the Riverside — Downtown Station and LAUS, travelling westbound in the AM and eastbound in the PM and one roundtrip during the off- peak hours. The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), SunLine, and Amtrak provide connecting transit service in Riverside County. The scheduled peak -direction trip time between Riverside — Downtown and LAUS varies between 83 and 88 minutes, including dwell time at intermediate stations. 91/ PV Line This route officially began operating peak period service on May 6, 2002, when it was called the 91 Line. With the completion of the Perris Valley Line extension in June 2016, the rebranded 91 /PV Line now extends the route to 85.6 miles between Perris — South and LAUS. The alignment roughly follows the Riverside Freeways (SR215 and SR91) along the BNSF San Bernardino subdivision through Riverside County to Fullerton in Orange County where it continues northwest to Downtown Los Angeles. This line serves stations along this line including Riverside — Downtown, Riverside — La Sierra, Corona — North Main, Corona — West, Fullerton, Buena Park, Norwalk/Santa Fe Springs, Commerce, and LAUS. RCTC, OCTA, and Metro jointly fund the Line. With the Perris Valley extension, new stations were added at Perris — South, Perris — Downtown, Moreno Valley/March Field, and Riverside — Hunter Park/UCR. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 11 The 91 /PV Line offers 15 weekday trains between the Perris — South Station and LADS. This service provides three roundtrips between Perris — South and LADS during peak hours in the peak direction, six bounce back trips that go from Perris — South to Riverside — Downtown, and three trips between LADS and the Riverside — Downtown Station. The 91 Line (now the 91/PV Line) weekend service started on July 5, 2014 and currently consists of two roundtrip trains that operate between LAUS and the Riverside — Downtown Station, travelling westbound in the AM and eastbound in the PM. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 91/PVL Line 91 Line Opening: May 2002 PVL Line Extension Opening: June 2016 Route miles: 85.6 Avg Trip Length (miles): 36.6 Trains Operated/Day: 13 Current Stations Served: Perris — South 1304 Case Rd Perris — Downtown 121 South C. St Moreno Valley/March Field 14160 Meridian Pkwy Riverside — Hunter Park/UCR 1101 Marlborough Ave Riverside — Downtown 4066 Vine St Riverside — La Sierra 10901 Indiana Ave Corona — North Main 250 E Blaine St Corona — West 155 S Auto Center Dr Fullerton 120 E Santa Fe Ave Buena Park Lakeknoll Dr & Dale St Norwalk/Santa Fe Springs 12700 Imperial Highway Commerce 6433 261h St LA Union Station 800 N Alameda St The peak period running time between Perris — South, Riverside — Downtown, and LADS is approximately 127 minutes. RTA, SunLine, and the Corona Cruiser provide connecting service in Riverside County. 2.2 Dial -A -Ride Service — System Performance RCTC has actively supported transit connections by establishing agreements with SCRRA and the Riverside County transit providers to provide free transfers for all connecting transit services at Riverside County stations. With the agreement, Metrolink ticket holders can ride both fixed route and Dial -A - Ride services for free as they travel to and from a station in Riverside County. RCTC subsidizes half the fare while Metrolink subsidizes the other half. Connecting transit to stations in Western Riverside County is provided by the Riverside Transit Authority (RTA), Sunline, Omnitrans, and the Corona Cruiser. In addition to its fixed routes, RTA developed CommuterLink to address commuter needs. This express service provides transit to and from Riverside Metrolink stations and transit centers during peak commuting periods. RTA has also added Routes 54, 52, and 26 to provide direct connections to the 91/PV Line and the Metrolink stations it serves. Route 54 provides a convenient RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 12 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION and critical last mile connection from the Riverside — Downtown Station to the Riverside County Administration services. The program aims to provide a viable transit alternative for commuters, helping mitigate congestion and pollution. The Corona Cruiser, operated by the City of Corona, provides a fixed route schedule but offers some route deviation with advance reservation. Buses run Monday through Saturday and serve the Corona — North Main Station as well as stops throughout Corona. SunLine's commuter express service connects residents of the Coachella Valley with the Pass Area and Western Riverside County. The service addresses the transit service gap between the Coachella Valley and Western Riverside County, providing alternative transportation options to commuting residents of Coachella Valley. During FY2017, RCTC also included Omnitrans as an additional bus operator to our Riverside — Downtown Station. This service connects Metrolink riders to additional commuter rail service with a direct connection to the San Bernardino Line and the Downtown San Bernardino transit station. Feeder buses and transit services are also critically important at the destination end. For the IEOC route, dedicated OCTA shuttle buses meet all peak period trains at Anaheim Canyon, Orange, Santa Ana, Tustin, and Irvine. Some OCTA buses meet trains at all these stations as well as Laguna Niguel/Mission Viejo, San Juan Capistrano, and San Clemente. Metrolink is proposing in their FY 2018-19 budget to establish co -marketing agreements with potential rideshare partners (i.e. Lyft and Uber) to provide riders with incentives to help resolve first mile/last mile connectivity issues. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 13 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2.3 Key Performance Indicators The following performance indicators are taken from SCRRA's Key Performance Indicators Quarterly Performance Report, FYI 7118 2nd Quarter (October — December 2017) to measure the effectiveness of the Riverside, IEOC, and 91/PV Lines. Year to Date (YTD) Revenue (Thousands) IEOC Line Riverside Line 91/PV Line FY17-18 Bu—dMFmq 573 Year to Date (YTD) Ridership (Thousands) (134 55 IEOC Line 608 611 3 Riverside Line 495 499 4 91/PV Line 371 403 32 The following performance indicators were provided by SCRRA and show additional details per line. IEOC Line Indicator FY 16/17 AUDITED FY 17/18 Budgeted FY 18/19 Projected Unlinked Passenger Trips 1,372,287 1,458,133 1,362,807 Subsidy/Passenger Mile $0.36 $0.36 $0.42 Farebox Recovery Ratio 31.8% 30.0% 27.5% Operating Expense/Passenger Mile $0.56 $0.54 $0.61 Operating Subsidy/Passenger $11.86 $12.31 $14.04 Operating Expense/Train Mile $78.87 $79.63 $81.89 Revenue Recovery 36.4% 34.2% 31.9% Passenger Miles per Revenue Car Mile 35.2 36.5 33.6 (Assumes 4 car set) RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 14 Riverside Line Indicator FY 16/17 AUDITED FY 17/18 Budgeted FY 18/19 Projected Unlinked Passenger Trips 1,004,402 986,769 967,476 Subsidy/Passenger Mile $0.27 $0.33 $0.36 Farebox Recovery Ratio 47.2% 43.2% 40.5% Operating Expense/Passenger Mile $0.53 $0.59 $0.62 Operating Subsidy/Passenger $9.37 $11.48 $12.43 Operating Expense/Train Mile $102.72 $104.24 $106.28 Revenue Recovery 49.1% 44.3% 42.1% Passenger Miles per Revenue Car Mile 48.6 44.1 43.0 (Assumes 4 car set) 91/PV Line AUDIO - Unlinked Passenger Trips 881,795 847,324 956,934 Subsidy/Passenger Mile $0.43 $0.51 $0.52 Farebox Recovery Ratio 26.5% 23.9% 24.6% Operating Expense/Passenger Mile $0.62 $0.70 $0.72 Operating Subsidy/Passenger $17.08 $20.08 $19.07 Operating Expense/Train Mile $89.63 $101.77 $110.02 Revenue Recovery 30.1% 27.1% 27.7% Passenger Miles per Revenue Car Mile 36.3 36.5 38.3 (Assumes 4 car set) 2.4 Productivity Improvement Efforts In early 2017, RCTC completed a market assessment that looked at the commute market within and around the Perris Valley. The purpose of this market assessment was to help RCTC understand where residents of western Riverside County (i.e. Moreno Valley, Perris, Hemet, San Jacinto, Temecula, Murrieta, and Menifee) commute and travel in order to define the ridership needs and trends that allow the most useful integration of the 91/PV Line into the Metrolink and regional transit systems. The subsequent Service & Infrastructure Needs to Support 91/Perris Valley Line Market Assessment Technical Memorandum (May 2017) assesses the operational feasibility of addressing the forecast travel markets identified in the market assessment. This included evaluating the potential reverse commute options to service March Air Force Base and the businesses in the area in the near and long-term and defining the infrastructure projects necessary to support these service needs. RCTC is continuing efforts to pursue service and infrastructure improvements, such as the proposed improvements to the Riverside - Downtown and Moreno Valley/March Field stations. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2.5 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth Over Next Two Years Tria Generators Feeder services to stations are vital to the success of commuter rail in Western Riverside County. Coordination and consultation with transit providers and local agencies is an ongoing process. RTA, RCTC, and Metrolink continue to work together to increase awareness of the RTA bus connections at the RCTC Metrolink stations. Ads regularly appear in the RTA Ride Guide promoting free RTA transfers from Metrolink stations. The Ride Guide includes the Metrolink stations in its Route Directory Listing. Also, Metrolink occasionally helps promote the RTA CommuterLink service in materials at the stations. Projected Growth Over Next Two Years Short-term (two-year to five-year) service needs as identified in the market assessment are: Enhancement of existing 91/PV and IEOC service between Riverside, Los Angeles, and Orange Counties. Robust peak period, intra-county service between Perris — Downtown and Riverside — Downtown. Introduction of reverse commute / peak service focused on the Hunter Park and Moreno Valley/March Field stations as employment centers. Service options were developed for the short-term as part of the Service & Infrastructure Needs to Support 91/Perris Valley Line Market Assessment Technical Memorandum (May 2017). One option assumes additional service increases along the BNSF San Bernardino Subdivision that allows for the expansion of peak and midday 91/PV Line trains. Assuming no additional increases in service, another option focuses on optimizing connectivity between trains at the Riverside -Downtown Station. Emphasis was given to connecting 91/PV Line trains to IEOC and Riverside Line trains to expand options for those traveling to / from the Perris Valley. No service increases were identified for the Riverside Line. This service, operated along the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Los Angeles Subdivision, is fully subscribed at 12 trains per weekday due to track constraints. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 16 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2.6 Equipment, Passenger Amenities, and Facility Needs Commuters boarding at RCTC Metrolink stations are provided with amenities that assist with their daily travel needs. Vending machines stocked with beverages and snacks are available at each station. Station facilities also include wireless internet access, bike lockers, designated parking for motorcycles and carpools. Furthermore, all stations are staffed 24 hours by contracted security guards with patrol vehicles, closed circuit television (CCTV), and various safety and security enhancements such as fencing and gates. Amenities are also available onboard the train. All train cars are equipped with restrooms, and some of the newer cars contain hook-ups for laptop computers. Additionally, designated bike/surfboard cars and quiet cars have been added throughout the system. Metrolink has developed the website www.metrolinktrains.com. This site provides passengers o'.'BIKES ry BIKES ON BOARD. with enhanced features allowing for greater content functionality. Improvements include regular service updates on the homepage, improved content management functions, enhanced usability, and a more consistent look and feel with features expected by our increasingly web savvy passengers. Additionally, passengers can subscribe through Twitter to obtain service updates and plan their trips using Google Transit. Metrolink also has an extensive social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube and related sites. Major needs, which continue to be the focus of RCTC attention for the SRTP FY 2018/19 — 2020/21, include the following: ■ Implementation of Positive Train Control (PTC); ■ Replacement of Ticket Vending Machines; and ■ Rehab/Renovation of passenger cars. Implementation of Positive Train Control (PTC) PTC has been a major technical undertaking and operating elements are currently available on multiple lines. PTC will continue to be a priority for Metrolink and RCTC to ensure the safety of the traveling public. The $215 million capital project was jointly funded by the member agencies and major components were in place prior to the initial federal deadline of 2015, this was later extended. Metrolink is making strides on this project and has implemented PTC into revenue service on lines it owns. Full implementation will continue to be a high priority. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 17 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Station Improvements and Construction of New Facilities In order to meet the capacity needs of current and future system growth and expansion, the following facilities will be completed or commenced in the upcoming fiscal year: ■ Construction of a covered passenger waiting and concession area at the Riverside — Downtown Metrolink Station. ■ Expand and enhance existing security and station surveillance at Metrolink Station operations. ■ Expand the parking at the Riverside — La Sierra Metrolink station. RCTC Station Maintenance The Commission fully funds and maintains all of the commuter rail stations in Riverside County, which is unique among the Metrolink member agencies. Since Metrolink service began along the Riverside Line in 1993, the Commission has been maintaining the Riverside — Downtown and Jurupa Valley/Pedley stations. When the IEOC Line began in 1995, the Riverside — La Sierra and Corona — West stations were added. Due to increasing demand, the Corona — North Main Station was added in 2002. Over the years, the stations show their age and require preventative maintenance. The Commission has always taken pride in the commuter rail stations and intends to invest significant resources to preserve the Commission's assets. Anticipated improvements include: ■ Comprehensive painting of station structures ■ Resealing and renovation of station parking lots ■ Improved access for disabled patrons ■ Drought tolerant landscaping upgrades Perris Valley Line Metrolink Extension Project Ap MI E L In June 2016, RCTC & Metrolink began operating trains along the Perris Valley Line extension. This 24-mile extension of Metrolink further into Riverside County marked the first line expansion since 1994. The $248M project included a combination of federal FTA Small Starts, CMAQ funds, along with other state and local funds including a significant portion of local Measure A Sales Tax. The line includes four new stations and a layover facility. Initial service included 12 daily trips between Perris — South and Riverside — Downtown with six of those trips continuing through to Los Angeles. Major improvements were made to 15 at -grade crossing and an extensive public safety effort was conducted in coordination with Operation Lifesaver. Ridership on the new line has been growing. A comprehensive growth study has been undertaken that includes a market assessment to identify commute patterns, and a subsequent infrastructure and service needs assessment to identify service growth and capital projects needed to support that growth. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 18 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Ticket Vendina Machines and Mobile Ticketina Application Metrolink's aging ticketing infrastructure will be getting replaced with new ticket vending machines and provide its customers with enhancements with the addition of the Mobile Ticketing application available to users with smart phones. The replacement and upgrade to the ticketing infrastructure will provide passengers a greater efficiency and ease when using the system. The Ticket Vending Machines will include a sleeker design and user friendly compatibilities. The timeline to replace and upgrade the legacy ticket vending machines (TVMs) may take up to twenty-four months from the date of notice -to -proceed (NTP). Metrolink has implemented a Mobile Ticketing Application systemwide. Usage is robust on the IEOC Line at 63%. Transferring compatibilities to the Metro light rail and subway system launched on December 30, 2017 to ensure customers continue the effortlessness connectivity to other transit providers. Rehab/Renovation and or Purchase of Locomotives Metrolink's aging fleet is undergoing a revamp of its locomotive fleet to improve daily operation of the system. Tier 4 locomotives are compliant with the latest U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) emissions standards and will reduce particulate matter and nitrogen oxide emissions by up to 85 percent, resulting in cleaner air for the region. Performance concerns have delayed the delivery of the new locomotives. SCRRA ordered 40 Tier 4 locomotives and as of February 5, 2018, SCRRA has received 16 locomotives. Fifteen of these are signed off as delivered and are undergoing final preparation for Conditional Acceptance. One arrived with damage and will be returned for repair. Thirteen additional locomotives are currently in production and six stored car bodies await entry into production. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 19 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CHAPTER 3 — PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION 3.1 Recent Service Changes On October 9, 2017 and April 1, 2018, and an extra change in May 2018, Metrolink adjusted the schedules to improved efficiency and on time performance. The October changes to schedules on Metrolink's Ventura County and Orange County lines were to improve service in response to rider feedback. Amtrak's Pacific Surfliner trains had schedule changes on multiple trains, which affected riders who use Amtrak service along the Orange County and Ventura County lines. This schedule change also included the departure and arrival times for the new San Bernardino — Downtown Station for all trains on the San Bernardino and IEOC lines. The April schedule change included service adjustments to shared Amtrak/Metrolink service trains (Amtrak Pacific Surfliner). No other changes were made on Metrolink lines. The extra May 2018 schedule change entails a full schedule change to commence service at the new Burbank Airport - North (Antelope Valley Line - AVL) station and for additional improvements are on other lines, including the San Bernardino Line, IEOC Line, Orange County Line, and Ventura County Line. 3.2 Recommended Service Changes and Modifications The RCTC rail program consists of planning, programming, advocacy, and implementation elements. This SRTP incorporates a variety of activities that support these elements. The FY 2018/19 Capital and Operating Plan reflects the efficiencies implemented since Metrolink's inception. Proposed service maximizes the use of existing rolling stock to relieve overcrowding. The FY 2018/19 proposed budget is under review by all of the member agencies and concurrence is anticipated by June 2018. Service level changes are not expected on any of the Metrolink lines that serve Riverside County at this time. The Commission's goal in participating in a regional commuter rail system is to provide useful transportation alternatives to its residents. To a large degree, this goal has already been achieved. Each morning, over 3,000 Riverside residents board one of Metrolink trains headed for jobs in Orange and Los Angeles counties. These rail commuters also contribute to a reduction in freeway traffic, removing more than 1.5 lanes of peak hour traffic each morning and each afternoon. Notwithstanding this success, a commuter rail service is unlike most of the projects funded by the Commission. The complete benefits of the project are not fully realized upon completion of construction or initial implementation of service. The commuter rail service must increase frequency as the demand increases over time. This increase in service is constrained by the availability of rail vehicles, capacity on the railroad, and available funding. Currently, not all of the Riverside County routes operate at optimal service levels. Two of the three Metrolink lines do not even offer minimum basic coverage during peak travel times. The IEOC and the 91/PV Line do not yet provide half-hourly headways and thus, their attractiveness to residents and ultimately their ridership and revenue performance are compromised. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 20 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION The infrastructure and service needs assessment associated with the Perris Valley Line Growth Study identified service expansions to be implemented in the short- (2-5 year), mid- (5-10 year), and long-term (10+ year) time frame. Overall, the proposed peak period service increases: ■ 30% on the 91/PV Line in the short- and mid-term scenarios over existing conditions ■ 70% on the 91/PV Line in the long-term scenario over existing conditions ■ 36% on the IEOC Line in the mid- and long-term scenarios over existing conditions Proaosed Coachella Vallev-San Goraonio Rail Service The concept of developing an expanded passenger rail service from Los Angeles to Indio and the Coachella Valley has been discussed for many years. Since FY2015, a separate Short Range Transit Plan was developed for the service. A brief overview is provided in this document. The plan includes new daily roundtrip Amtrak trains to the Coachella Valley provided through the Amtrak/Caltrans state partnership. RCTC, in conjunction with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), Caltrans Division of Rail, and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) will begin the first phase of detailed corridor planning with the initiation of the Service Development Plan (SDP). This SDP will be the first major study that will carefully design a viable service plan with appropriate ridership and service modeling plans. The effort along with completion of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the corridor will allow it to compete for future federal funding. RCTC worked closely with Caltrans to initiate the Alternatives Analysis that has been completed and shows promising ridership potential for the new route. RCTC is the lead on the Service Development Plan study and intends to use FRA grant funds to complete the project. In addition, there is local support for this effort from the CVAG Executive Committee who has directed staff to establish a 90% bus transit/10% passenger rail service funding allocation split for Coachella Valley TDA funds. In addition, an MOU will be established between RCTC and CVAG to develop a Coachella Valley Rail Fund that will use both the TDA funds and additional state and local funds to conduct station development studies and provide initial capital funding for station development. It has been determined through numerous studies over the years that the Amtrak intercity option is preferred over a Metrolink commuter option, because of the long trip length and added comfort and amenities on the Amtrak trains and Amtrak's contractual rights to operate over freight railroads. 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotion Metrolink will continue outreach to new residents through direct -mail campaigns to homeowners within the system's sphere of service in Riverside County. Additionally, Metrolink is developing a targeted marketing strategy with all its member agencies. RCTC has budgeted for targeted promotion of service during the summer months as well as building ridership for the 91/PV Line. RCTC has also enhanced its share of Marketing in-house by working with our marketing consultant Arellano and Metrolink. With their help, we have increased our Rail Safety awareness and overall rail service through a grass root campaign that includes participating at local events, reaching out to schools, senior centers and specialty groups. As our focus continues on increasing ridership on the Metrolink lines, we are looking on ways to promote what Metrolink has to offer to the residents of Riverside County. Some of the marketing efforts have been: new residential mail out campaigns, school trips, partnering with Field of Dreams in the City of Perris, social media, billboards, and attending local events to hand out promotional material. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 21 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Metrolink Proposed Promotions and Marketina Campaians Metrolink has included a marketing plan strategy in their FY2018-19 proposed budget to attract new riders, retain current riders, recapture former riders, and have customized line marketing campaigns. Loyalty Program Campaign Metrolink is proposing the development of a loyalty program to reward riders for their continued engagement with Metrolink. Loyalty programs can encompass enrollment incentives, deals and discounts, and referral rewards to name just a few. Corporate Partnerships Program (CPP) Metrolink is working with their technology partners to integrate the CPP into the Mobile App and is proposing a business -to -business marketing campaign to gain more corporate accounts. Line Awareness Marketing Campaign Metrolink is proposing marketing campaigns to attract ridership as part of their draft FY2018-19 budget. These marketing campaigns will use various marketing strategies, such as billboards, bus shelter advertising, radio spots, social media advertising, digital and mobile app advertising, and print advertising. A proposed 91/PV Line Awareness campaign is intended to attract new riders. A proposed IEOC Line Awareness campaign is intended to attract and recapture riders. Special Event Train Service In addition to the regular Fixed Route Service, RCTC has partnered with other agencies and Metrolink to provide our county's residents access to special train services to events garnering high vehicle congestion such as sporting and holiday events. The service is contingent upon additional operation and grant funding. These type of promotional services have been highly successful in garnering ridership, so RCTC is planning on offering the following special train service provided the additional funding is acquired: Friday Angels Express Train Partnering with Orange County Transit Authority (OCTA) and Metrolink has allowed RCTC to fund some special trains on to Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim (Angels) baseball games. An "Angels Express" promotional service is offered for Friday night Angel baseball games for $7 roundtrip for adults, $6 for seniors and persons with disabilities, $4 for youths, and free for kids under 5 who are accompanied by a paying adult. This service is supported by Mobile Source Air Pollution Committee grant funds. The train leaves the Perris — South at 4:15 p.m. making all stops along the way and terminates at the Orange Station at 6:10 p.m. Riders will then transfer to an Orange County Line train that leaves at 6:16 p.m. and arrives at the train station located in the stadium parking lot, The Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC), at 6:20 p.m. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 22 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION The train departs the Orange Station to Riverside 45 minutes after the game, allowing fans to enjoy the fireworks show of Big Bang Fridays. Once again, riders will have to transfer to a Perris/Riverside-bound train at the Orange Station for the ride home. Festival of Lights Train Through the growing success and interest of the City of Riverside's month long Festival of Lights (FOL), RCTC partnered with the City, Mission Inn Hotel & Spa, OCTA, Metro, RTA, and Metrolink to provide special train service on Friday and Saturday for four weekends of the FOL event. The special event trains started in 2016 and are planned to continue. The service's objective is to help alleviate local traffic jams and provide a transportation to one of the most well know events in Riverside County. The service plan includes trains from Perris as well as Los Angeles and Orange County. The promotional fare for train riders is $7 roundtrip and it includes a free transfer to RTA's FOL shuttle bus service that transports passengers from the Riverside — Downtown Station to the event center. Rams Train RCTC, along with Metrolink, was able to provide special train service to selected Rams football games during FY 16/17 and again in FY 17/18. The service that included promotional round trip fares of $10 were very successful and garnered interest throughout our county. The train runs along the 91/PV Line, which provides residents from as far south in Perris an alternative mode of transportation to Los Angeles. It is RCTC's intent to participate once again in FY 18/19 to provide the service again. 3.4 Budget Impact on Proposed Changes Metrolink's FY2018-19 proposed budget an increase overall marketing budget. This figure includes: ■ Focused on the Metrolink 91/PV Line. ■ Includes local grass roots outreach and promotion of Metrolink RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 23 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CHAPTER 4— FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget This SRTP reflects the Commission's commitment to the commuter rail goals in the FY 2018/19 RCTC Budget: ■ Improve utilization and increase efficiency of commuter rail lines serving Riverside County. ■ Promote commuter rail service along the new 91/PV Line corridor. ■ Maximize opportunities for public use of rail -related investments. Specific highlights of the FY 2018/19 Budget include: ■ Special Train services: Angels, Rams, and FOL trains. ■ Continuation of the implementation of Positive Train Control in the Metrolink network. ■ An additional increase in operating subsidy due to PTC costs and 91 Line expansion into Perris Valley. 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program With the passage of Measure A in 1988, $100 million was identified and committed to the development and implementation of a commuter rail system to serve Riverside County residents. The Rail Department uses LTF and Measure A funding for operations as well as federal 5307, 5309, 5337, State of Good Repair and LCTOP funds for capital. RCTC holds two voting positions on SCRRA's eleven -member Board. RCTC staff members serve on the five -county Technical Advisory Committee which negotiates service and funding levels based upon the counties' established priorities. Staff also provides technical assistance, coordination between various SCRRA and RCTC departments, and linkages to local communities. 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements Public participation regarding service levels is largely garnered through the bi-annual on -board survey. Public hearings are held prior to any service changes. Daily receipt of feedback from the public is sought through Metrolink's 1-800-371-LINK (5465) and website www.metrolinktrains.com. Additionally, RCTC maintains a customer service number (951) 778- 1092, provides service updates through Twitter and receives comments through the www.rctc.org website. Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VI SCRRA is responsible for the regulatory and compliance requirements governing the use of federal and state funds in accordance with ADA and Title VI. Accordingly, RCTC is responsible for additional compliance requirements as it relates to station facilities. All Metrolink trains and stations are accessible to persons with disabilities. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 24 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TDA Triennial Audit, FTA Triennial Audit, NTD The RCTC TDA Triennial Audit was completed in September, 2016. The last audit resulted in no findings as pertained to the Rail Program. The FTA Triennial Audit was conducted in 2018 with no findings. NTD is reported annually by both SCRRA and RCTC. Alternative Fueled Vehicles RCTC POLICY Metrolink uses ultra -low sulfur diesel in its locomotives. It has initiated a procurement for state of the art Tier IV emissions level locomotives that should be placed in service in 2019. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 25 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Table 1 — Fleet Inventory Table 2 — SRTP Service Summary See previous section. Table 2A — Summary of Routes to Be Excluded in FY 2018/19 Not Applicable. Table 3 — SRTP Route Statistics See section 2.3 Key Performance Indicators Table 3A — Individual Route Descriptions See previous section. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 26 Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested forFY 2018/19 \ w § ) j \ \ / } 0 ° o � � \ S 4 « a _ _ cd § } M ( § � - - - - \ k / to ° E / = y ) ) - ] U$ e @ � ) )LL \ } { § § C CD } \ C \ k [ / 5 ! \ \ \ } \ \ \ C y r } } $ / 2)4 » RIVERSIDE _m __an> y emea RCTC RAIL SRTR w 218/19-202oi, 27 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 19 — 1 PROJECT NAME: Metrolink Rehabilitation Project SOGR FY17/18 Funds PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This Project will provide the following: Rehabilitation, reconstruction or replacement of Metrolink structures, track, trackbed, signals, communication systems, facilities, stations, platforms, signage, equipment, systems and rolling stock to ensure state of good repair. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is funded by a SB1 State of Good Repair grant. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): SB1 State of Good Repair Grant $752,084 Total $75Z084 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 28 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Table 5.1 — Summary of Funds Requested in FY 2019/20 O O O O o O C 0 C o O o = = O O O O O O O O o o 0) 0 0 M Cn U- LL Q o 0 C O O O C O 7 o O0 N 407 N N q O LL U O o o m O c o m O c o w J O m U7 O O O O O O O O O O I� r O O O to M o O M O M J V N N N N N c o o o o O O O O 0 O 0 O LL O o O O M M n n N O O CN, V I� Of C jp U � R O. A U D Z O} m m O LL o 3 a y r'n U O a (D ° Q U O_ R i x y U U w - c (n c m O f, � . a 0 O C O O 0 0j5 m N a O U w c� O c F F R O o d Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification N/A RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 — 2020/21 29 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Table 5.2 — Summary of Funds Requested in FY 2020/21 0 C �o o 0 C 0 0 3 W C p O O O � O T LL Q O p N O O O O � N O O N N p O OW O LL a o 0 O o U o w W «n J CO O O O O O O O o o LL o 0 J c2 M M ri N O O O O O O Ci 0 0 o O O L O N T O d _mm N M I- l0 M 7 r � {O i3 O H � � c C N U N E U d O U d } f0 o LL a � a rn N T j N !n � c m O N N .- c � C Q Q N N C R U L W In 6 O C a O o U O o m a O Q U O c H H a x u��of F- Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification N/A RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 30 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Table 6 — Update Actions Taken or To Be Implemented to Comply with the Most Recent Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations N/A Table 7 — Service Provider Performance Target Report Due to significant differences in the type and availability of performance data the Commuter Rail Program no longer reports into the RCTC PIP program. Table 8 — FY 2018/19 SRTP Performance Report Due to significant differences in the type and availability of performance data the Commuter Rail Program no longer reports into the RCTC PIP program. Table 9A — Highlights of FY 18/19 SRTP Specific highlights of the FY 2018/19 Commuter Rail Plans include: o No fare increase; o Continued operations and target marketing of the Perris Valley Line Metrolink extension; o Continued support of special trains including Festival of Lights, Angels Express and Rams Trains; o Continued cost increase to support for positive train control and contractual step increases with major Metrolink service vendors; and o Continue Next Generation Rail and Transit Study. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 31 FINAL DRAFT City of Corona Transit Service FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan Tabl e o f Conte nts CHAPTER 1— SYSTEM OVERVIEW.....................................................................................3 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................3 1.1 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE AREA..........................................................................................3 1.2 POPULATION PROFILE AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS.......................................................6 1.3 FIXED ROUTE TRANSIT SERVICES AND PARATRANSITSERVICE...................................................7 1.4 CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE AND PROPOSED FARE STRUCTURE.................................................9 1.5 REVENUE FLEET................................................................................................................9 1.6 EXISTING FACILITY/PLANNED FACILITIES.............................................................................10 1.7 EXISTING COORDINATION BETWEEN TRANSIT AGENCIES........................................................10 CHAPTER 2 — EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE....................................10 2.1 FIXED ROUTE SERVICE — ROUTE BY ROUTE ANALYSIS............................................................10 2.2 DIAL -A -RIDE SERVICE — SYSTEM PERFORMANCE..................................................................12 2.3 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS.......................................................................................12 2.4 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS.............................................................................14 2.5 MAJOR TRIP GENERATORS AND PROJECTED GROWTH...........................................................14 2.6 EQUIPMENT, PASSENGER AMENITIES, AND FACILITY NEEDS...................................................15 CHAPTER 3 — PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION ..........................15 3.1 RECENT SERVICE CHANGES...............................................................................................15 3.2 RECOMMENDED LOCAL & EXPRESS ROUTE MODIFICATIONS..................................................15 3.3 MARKETING PLANS AND PROMOTION................................................................................16 3.4 BUDGET IMPACT AND PROPOSED CHANGES........................................................................17 CHAPTER 4 — FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS.............................................................17 4.1 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET....................................................................................17 4.2 FUNDING PLANS TO SUPPORT PROPOSED OPERATING AND CAPITAL PROGRAM .........................18 4.3 REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS.................................................................19 TABLES..............................................................................................................................22 TABLE 1 — BUS FLEET INVENTORY.............................................................................................23 TABLE 1 — DAR FLEET INVENTORY.............................................................................................24 TABLE 2 — SYSTEMWIDE...........................................................................................................25 TABLE2 - Bus.......................................................................................................................26 TABLE2 — DAR......................................................................................................................27 City of Corona Transit Service Page 1 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE 3 — DATA ELEMENTS.....................................................................................................28 TABLE 3 — PERFORMANCE INDICATORS.......................................................................................29 TABLE 3A — INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS AND AREA SERVICED...............................................30 TABLE 4 — SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED FOR FY 2018/19......................................................31 TABLE 4A —CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION..............................................................................32 TABLE 5.1 — SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED FOR FY 2019/20...................................................36 TABLE 5.1A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION...........................................................................37 TABLE 5.2 — SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED FOR FY 2020/21...................................................39 TABLE 6 — PROGRESS IMPLEMENTING TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS*..............................................................................40 TABLE 7 — FY 2017/18 PERFORMANCE TARGET REPORT...............................................................42 TABLE 8 — FY 2018/19 SRTP PERFORMANCE REPORT..................................................................43 TABLE 9 — CCTS HIGHLIGHTS FY 2018/19.................................................................................44 TABLE 9A — OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA............................................................................44 TABLE 913 — FAREBOX REVENUE CALCULATION.............................................................................45 City of Corona Transit Service Page 2 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan Chapter 1— System Overview 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) sets the objectives and strategies for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018/19 for the City of Corona Transit Service (CCTS) by evaluating current transit system performance, projected demographic changes, operating and capital funding needs, anticipated funding from federal, state and local sources, and other factors to create a reasonable projection of conditions over the next three years (FY 2018/19 — 2020/21). 1.1 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE AREA CCTS operates demand response Dial -A -Ride (DAR) and fixed route dubbed the Corona Cruiser. DAR service commenced in 1977 available to the general public until January 2, 2018. The service is now available only to the following rider groups: Seniors 60 and older; Persons with Disabilities; and Persons certified under Americans with Disability Act (ADA). DAR provides curb -to -curb service throughout the City of Corona and neighboring county areas of Coronita, El Cerrito, and Home Gardens as well as satellite locations in the City of Norco (Department of Motor Vehicles, Department of Public Social Services, and Norco College). The complementary paratransit Dial -A -Ride service area extends beyond city limits to ensure compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act 3/4 mile corridor from a Corona Cruiser fixed route. Door-to-door service is available upon request for Dial -A -Ride patrons certified under the ADA. Corona Cruiser fixed route began operating in 2001 and serves the city -center as well as commercial, retail, and residential areas on the eastern and southern portion of the city. See service maps on the following pages. City of Corona Transit Service Page 3 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan City of Corona C'*RONA CRUISER SERVICE AREA MAP.� —P� City of Corona THE CIRCLE CIT+ 0,1RONA DIAL -A —RIDE SERVICE AREA MAP clSATELLITE POINTS Norcc Sata�te PnhsrPunrns satsltas an Norco • Department of Putillc & Sodal Servlcas • Norco College (Rcc) • Departmerrt of 1Arro°r Uenlrles (DMV� • 6runswlok Classlc La.+es • Target {1 i — A o i 5 � cg P. a LEGEND -- CORONA DIAL -A -RIDE POPULAR D ESTINATION 5: DIAL -A RIDL iO NORCO COLLEGE s crrrrwa ro�rargc.e rFrnouRn - NORM SATELLITE LOCATIONS ® ❑ C11r OF CORONA HdUvl6ARY t OUNTY AREAS OF 5ERVIrP Mf SAYUROAV 3ERVICE i0905 LACUS II --I II P!RRaw°c °avR�L L�uwr CORONACRUISER RELINE CdradNA CRUISER RED LINE RTA'S Fixed Routes 04TERyE0I4TE EHInmcli [o IOHA pgppH{ Rap dLlRk GmId In• 9GyWL SW09L RECIMAT 711WNi .a.e. Roun1 RETI•HILRATIpI QyJroL CORONA CRUISER BLUE LINE 011. > C2tN`IR Rvure SED- J441 r Sri MILE CORRI68R OIfT'81OE u.".. 'ropLLrnk 205 0E CORONA DIALS AZE SERVICE AREA NAP w7r To SCALE 1.2 POPULATION PROFILE AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS Based on the 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-year Estimate, CCTS serves a diverse population of 161,614 city residents. The city encompasses 39 square miles. That diversity is reflected in the table below. Race City Population ancllJaversa Demographic Population percent Estimate Total population 161,614 100.0% One race 154,716 95.7% Two or more races 6,898 4.3% One race 154,716 95.7% White 113,020 69.9% Black or African American 7,818 4.8% American Indian and Alaska Native 821 0.5% Asian 18,525 11.50o Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 759 0.5% Some other race 13,773 8.5% or more races 6,898 4 White and Black or African American 943 0 White and American Indian and Alaska Native 764 0 White and Asian 2,074 1 Black or African American and American Indian and Alaska Native 70 0 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate The table below lists passenger characteristics for Dial -A -Ride and Cruiser service. Passenger characteristic estimates are based on derived data compiled over the first nine months of FY 2017/18. Passenger Characteristics Dial-A-111 M Corona Cruiser Seniors/Persons with Disabilities 92.3% General Public 41.9% 27.2% General Public* 3.3% Students Metrolink Transfers Personal Care Attendants Children 2.0% 1.5% 0.9% Seniors/Persons with Disabilities RTA Transfers Children 22.6% 5.7% 2.1 % Metrolink Transfers 0.5% *Effective january 2, 2018, no general public DAR; service only available to the following categories: Seniors 60 and older; Persons with Disabilities; and Perons certified under Americians with Disabilities Act (ADA). City of Corona Transit Service Page 6 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan 1.3 FIXED ROUTE TRANSIT SERVICES AND PARA TRANSIT SERVICE City of Corona Transit Service(CCTS) provides both fixed route, Corona Cruiser and Dial -A -Ride (DAR) services. DAR service began in 1977, while the Corona Cruiser commenced in 2001. CCTS serves local business, retail stores, parks, school and entertainment venues. The City contracts with the private sector to provide a turn -key transit operation. Using passenger trips from the first nine months of FY 2017/18 as a basis for estimating fiscal year-end totals, system wide passenger trips are expected to decrease by 3.7 percent to 190,766 total passenger trips compared to 198,049 passenger trips in FY 2016/17. While it is difficult to pinpoint with certainty the cause of declining passenger trips, increased congestion due to construction projects throughout most of the CCTS' service area is a factor in challenging buses to remain on schedule. When buses are less reliable, passengers will find better alternatives. However, the cause of the majority of the decline in ridership for FY 2017/18 is due to the change from General Public to Specialized Dial -A -Ride Services. CCTS staff is optimistic that the decrease in passenger trips will bottom -out and is projecting a 4.8% increase for overall system wide passenger trips to 200,304 for FY 2018/19. Staff will focus on efficiencies and additional marketing efforts. Corona Cruiser — Blue and Red Lines The Blue Line serves the McKinley Street retail area, then travels on to Magnolia Avenue and Main Street to the River Road area. This route passes by many trip generators such as hospitals, medical facilities, schools, public service agencies, library, civic center, and commercial/retail areas. This route also serves the unincorporated area of Home Gardens. The Blue Line operates every 60-67 minutes. The Red Line connects the residential areas of central Corona with commercial areas along Sixth Street and the Ontario Avenue/California Avenue retail area. The Red Line also covers South Corona along Ontario Avenue/Temescal Canyon Road to serve the county area of El Cerrito, The Crossings shopping complex at Cajalco Road/Temescal Canyon Road, and The Shops at Dos Lagos on Saturdays. The Red Line operates every 50-66 minutes. The Cruiser schedule is as follows: Blue Line Monday — Friday 6:30 a.m. — 7:09 p.m Saturday Sunday 8:52 a.m. — 3:50 p.m no service Red Line 6:30 a.m. — 7:05 p.m. 9:00 a.m. — 5:09 p.m. no service The Cruiser does not operate on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. The Cruiser also serves the Corona Transit Center, owned and operated by the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). The Corona Transit Center provides a safe and efficient transfer point between local and regional bus lines as well as regional commuter trains serving Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties. Trains are accessible via a pedestrian bridge to the adjacent North Main Corona Metrolink commuter rail station. To incentivize multimodal City of Corona Transit Service Page 7 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan transportation, valid Metrolink pass -holders ride at no charge on Cruiser Blue and Red Lines to and from the Corona Transit Center/North Main Metrolink Station. CCTS and RTA have a reciprocal agreement that allows valid pass -holders a no cost, one-way transfer between the Cruiser and RTA buses at bus stops served by both Cruiser and RTA buses. Transfers between bus systems are an effective way to promote public transit as a low cost, eco- friendly, and stress -free alternative to automobile trips. Corona Dial -A -Ride Dial -A -Ride provided service to the general public until January 2, 2018. The service is now available to seniors (60 and older), persons with disabilities, and individuals certified for complementary paratransit service under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). City Council authorized the transition of the DAR program from General Public to Specialized Service on August 16, 2017. As part of the DAR services changes, CCTS has established an eligibility application process for the Specialized Service based on the following criteria: Seniors (age 60 or older) and persons with disabilities. The criteria are developed to ensure only the qualified patrons are utilizing the service. Those that are certified under ADA are not required to submit an eligibility application; they only need to provide their ADA ID as proof of eligibility. In addition to the change to the service, CCTS has also developed and implemented the No Show Policy. The No -Show Policy has been vetted through Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Civil Rights Office. Reservations for DAR service can be made from one to fourteen days in advance; however, same day service may be accommodated if space is available. Dial -A -Ride provides curb -to - curb service throughout the City of Corona and neighboring county areas of Coronita, El Cerrito, and Home Gardens as well as satellite locations in the City of Norco (Department of Motor Vehicles, Department of Public Social Services and Norco College). Door-to-door assistance for ADA certified passengers is available upon request. Door-to-door service is available when: Drivers can see the bus at all times; • The outermost door is within 150 feet from the bus; • Driver safety and security is maintained; and • Where a safe parking area is available. The ADA certification process in western Riverside County is administered by the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). Additional information and application is available online at www.riversidetransit.com or by calling RTA at (951) 795-7887. For individuals certified for ADA complementary service, service hours are expanded to match Cruiser hours. Passengers certified under the ADA receive priority service. Voicemail message reservations are accepted for ADA clients on Sundays and Holidays for next day service. The Dial -A -Ride schedule is as follows: Non-ADA Complementary Paratransit Monday — Friday 6:42 a.m. — 6:00 p.m Saturday 8:52 a.m. — 5:09 p.m Sunday no service City of Corona Transit Service FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan ADA Complementary Paratransit 6:30 a.m. — 7:09 p.m. 8:52 a.m. — 5:09 p.m. no service Page 8 of 45 Dial -A -Ride service does not operate on the following holidays: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE AND PROPOSED FARE STRUCTURE The below table depicts the current fare structure. Fare Structure Fare Type Fare Price Corona Cruiser Cash - General Public $1.50 Cash - Seniors / Persons with Disabilities / Medicare Card Holders $0.70 Cash - Children (46" tall or under) $0.25 Day Pass - General Public $4.00 Day Pass - Seniors / Persons with Disabilities / Medicare Card Holders $2.00 15-day Pass - General Public $17.50 15-day Pass - Seniors / Persons with Disabilities / Medicare Card Holders $8.05 15-day Pass - Students $12.25 31-day Pass - General Public 31-day Pass - Seniors / Persons with Disabilities / Medicare Card Holders $35.00 $16.10 31-day Pass - Students $24.50 Dial -A -Ride Seniors / Persons with Disabilities / Medicare Card Holders Buddy Fare Children $2.50 $1.25 $0.50 Note: Fixed Route fare structure effective July 5, 2010; Dial -A -Ride fare structure effective January 2, 2018. To incentivize the use of public transit as a viable alternative to automobile trips, CCTS is using Air Quality Management District (AQMD) funds to subsidize multi -day passes (15 day and 31- day passes) on the Cruiser. The use of these funds allows CCTS to reduce the cost of multi - day passes by 30 percent for Cruiser riders, but enables CCTS to recover an adequate fare. REVENUE FLEET The CCTS active fleet consists of 20 transit buses. All CCTS buses are compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirement for accessibility and wheelchair securement. The Fixed Route fleet consists of seven 2015 ElDorado National EZ Rider II heavy-duty/low-floor buses. EZ Rider II buses are powered with Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and were placed into Corona Cruiser service in February 2016. City of Corona Transit Service Page 9 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan Recently in April 2018, CCTS took delivery of eleven 2017 Glaval Universal vehicles to replace the 2012 (10) & 2006 (1) El Dorado National Aerotech vehicles. The new vehicles are Class C Ford Chasis CNG buses and are expected to be placed in service May 2018. CCTS will no longer have a need to continue leasing the 2008 ELDorado Starcraft from contractor as staff is considering to keep the best two of the older 2012 CNG vehicles. 1.6 EXISTING FACILITYIPLANNED FACILITIES CCTS operates from facility located at 735 Public Safety Way. Transportation Concepts, the vendor retained to operate transit service, provides administrative and dispatching service from this location, as well as fueling and vehicle parking. Maintenance is performed by the vendor at an off -site garage. 1.7 EXISTING COORDINATION BETWEEN TRANSITAGENCIES CCTS staff and Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) planning and operations staff work together to coordinate bus stop location/re-location, bus routing, layover areas/facilities, and transfer points where Cruiser and RTA passengers possessing valid day or multi -day passes can ride for free with a one-way transfer between systems. Chanter 2 — ExistinLy Service and Route Performance 2.1 FIXED ROUTE SERVICE — ROUTE BY ROUTE ANALYSIS CCTS operates the Cruiser along two fixed routes — the Blue Line and Red Line. Passenger trips on the Cruiser totaled 132,469 in FY 2016/17. Using the number of passenger trips recorded during the first nine months of FY 2017/18 as a basis for estimating year-end totals, passenger trips on the Corona Cruiser are projected to decline by .7 percent, or 923 trips, compared to the previous fiscal year. Based on improving conditions outlined below, CCTS staff is cautiously projecting a 4.8 percent increase, or 6,577 more trips, in year -over -year passenger trips for a total of 138,123 passenger trips for FY 2018/19. See graphs on the following page of passenger breakdown by route. City of Corona Transit Service Page 10 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan Corona Cruiser Passenger Trips 180,000 160,000 140,000 a 120,000 L ~ 100,000 MO M 80,000 H N a 60,000 40,000 20,000 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18* FY 18/19* * FY 2017/18 year-end estimate is based on data collected from July 2017-March 2018. ** FY 2018/19 projections are based on a 4.8 percent increase over estimated FY 2017/18 year-end totals. Passenger trips on the Blue Line are expected to decrease by 3.9 percent or 2,616 trips in FY 2017/18 when compared to the previous year. Passenger trips on the Red Line are estimated to increase by 2.6 percent or 1,693 trips when compared to the same period. The increase in the Red Line is mainly due to the change in the DAR services whereas some of the general public/student riders have migrated to the Fixed Route Service, in particular the Red Line. Corona Cruiser Passenger Trips by Route 100,000 90,000 80,000 a 70,000 F- 60,000 L t 50,000 CA 40,000 VI a 30,000 20,000 10,000 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18* FY 18/19* Blue Line Red Line * FY 2017/18 year-end estimate is based on data collected from July 2017-March 2018. ** FY 2018/19 projections are based on a 4.8 percent increase over estimated FY 2017/18 year-end totals. City of Corona Transit Service Page 11 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan 2.2 DIAL -A -RIDE SERVICE —SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Dial -A -Ride provided 65,580 passenger trips in FY 2016/17. Using data collected from the first nine months of FY 2017/18 as a basis for estimating year-end totals, passenger trips may decrease by 9.7 percent, or 6,360 trips, as compared to FY 2016/17. The decrease in FY 2017/18 passenger trips are due to elimination of general -public DAR. (See Section 1.3 under DAR for details). General public accounted for about 10 percent of the riders; students account for many of the general public riders on DAR. It is expected that many of these riders may have transitioned to the Fixed Route service, in particular the Red Line. While staff is projecting a decline in ridership for FY 2017/8, FY 2018/19 is expected to see an increase of 4.8 percent, or 2,961 in year -over -year passenger trips. Staff has already seen an increase in DAR participants through the application process as many new patrons have been added. DAR PassengerTrips 70,000 60,000 a 50,000 L L tw 40,000 c v a 30,000 20,000 10,000 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18* FY 18/19* * FY 2017/18 year-end estimate is based on data collected from July 2017-March 2018. ** FY 2018/19 projections are based on a 4.8 percent increase over estimated FY 2017/18 year-end totals. During FY 2017/18, Senior citizens and people with disabilities represent 92.3% of total Dial -A - Ride passengers. General public and Metrolink riders make up another 5.5% of DAR riders. 2.3 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) is the designated Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) with fiduciary and administrative oversight of transit operators in Riverside County. Each year, RCTC reviews and approves the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) and allocates local, state and federal funding. RCTC developed and monitors eight performance indicators that measure productivity — these indicators and year-to-date performance are listed in the table on the next page. By statute, transit operators serving urban areas must recover a minimum of 20 percent of operating cost through fare revenue for fixed route and 10 percent for Dial -A -Ride Specialized Service with combined system -wide blended farebox recovery of 15 percent. Fare revenue includes passenger fares, interest on investments, advertising revenue, local contributions, and the proceeds from the sale of surplus vehicles. A City of Corona Transit Service Page 12 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan farebox recovery ratio below the system -side 15 percent endangers the receipt of state funding. The farebox recovery ratio is a mandatory performance indicator. Performance Indicators Combined Corona Cruiser fixed route and Dial -A -Ride Performance Based on data from RCTC TransTrack Table 7 for the period July 2017-March 2018 Performance Indicators FY 2017/18 Target FY 2017/18 3rd Qtr. Performance Year -to -Date Performance Scorecard Mandatory: 1. Farebox recovery ratio* >_ 15.0% 13.77% Fails to Meet Target Discretionary 1. Operating cost per revenue hour <_ $72.17 $73.51 Fails to Meet Target 2. Subsidy per passenger >_ $8.11 and <_ $10.97 $9.97 Meets Target 3. Subsidy per passenger mile >_ $1.89 and <_ $2.55 $2.33 Meets Target 4. Subsidy per hour >_ $51.19 and <_ $69.25 $63.38 Meets Target 5. Subsidy per mile >_ $4.11 and <_ $5.55 $5.11 Meets Target 6. Passenger per revenue hour >_ 5.36 and <_ 7.25 6.40 Meets Target 7. Passengers per revenue mile >_ 0.43 and <_ 0.59 0.51 Meets Target *System -wide farebox recovery ratio reduced from 20%to blended rate of 15% due to change from general public DAR to Specialized DAR. Through the third quarter of this fiscal year (July 2017-March 2018), CCTS has recorded a farebox recovery of 13.77 percent. A farebox recovery ratio in this range is anticipated at this point in the fiscal year. At the close of each fiscal year, the City contributes a sufficient amount of funding to bridge the gap between fare revenue received throughout the year and the amount required to meet the 15 percent farebox recover ratio. The contribution of funds is made only after all revenues and expenses are finalized following the close of the fiscal year. The size of the contribution varies each year depending on the final amount of revenues and expenses; however, the City's year-end contribution has always ensured CCTS meets the mandatory farebox recovery ratio. In addition, CCTS expects to meet the target for Subsidy per Passenger upon close of the fiscal year as final revenues are recognized and subsidy is decreased. Table 7, Service Provider Performance Targets Report, appearing on page 43 of this plan, shows in greater detail on FY 2017/18 performance targets and actual performance by indicator. Table 8, SRTP Performance Report, appearing on page 44 of this plan, lists performance targets set by RCTC for FY 2018/19. Table 8 indicates CCTS meets the mandatory farebox recovery ratio and six of seven discretionary targets. The target for farebox recovery ratio is set for 15 percent. The target for operating costs per revenue hour for FY 2018/19 is calculated using operating costs accumulated during the first nine months of the current fiscal year (July 2017-March 2018 in this case), City of Corona Transit Service Page 13 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan increase in revenue hour cost for transit operating contract and adjustment by the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Currently, CPI is 2.1 percent. Increased costs in materials, marketing and utility contributed to the increase in cost per hour. This is due to increase in advertising, equipment maintenance and office supplies. In addition, FY 18-19 budget includes consulting services for vehicle maintenance oversight program and fixed route planning, scheduling and run -cutting project. 2.4 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS Productivity, as measured by the number of passengers per revenue hour and revenue miles showed year -over -year between FY 2013/14 and FY 2017/18 on the Corona Cruiser and Dial - A -Ride. Productivity continue to drop through the current year. Productivity for Dial -A -Ride, however, showed an improvement between FY 2015/16 and FY 2016/17, but showed similar declines in productivity for FY 2017/18. Along with all other vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians, Corona Cruiser and Dial -A -Ride buses are impacted by increased traffic congestion resulting from construction work throughout City of Corona. Freeway lane reductions and ramp closures, local street and lane closures, detours, and the movement of heavy equipment all increase congestion and impact traffic flow, which slows buses. Slower speeds result in longer duration trips, thereby impacting productivity. FY 2018/19 will bring newer fleet to DAR, replacing the aging bus fleet. CCTS DAR experienced in-service breakdowns and longer duration repairs as buses aged. Similar to the impact of increasing congestion, buses breaking down in-service make using CCTS bus service less reliable - motivating passengers to find more reliable alternatives to using the service. As related previously in this plan, CCTS staff is optimistic that the decline in productivity, as well as the decrease in passenger trips, will start to bottom -out and begin to slowly improve throughout FY 2018/19. See productivity measures in the table on the following page. Productivity Measures Mode Productivity FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18* Passengers per revenue hour 11.70 11.50 10.42 9.06 9.04 Corona Cruiser Passengers per revenue mile 0.99 0.97 0.89 0.77 0.76 Passengers per revenue hour 4.20 3.90 3.65 3.92 3.83 Dial -A -Ride Passengers per revenue mile 0.31 0.29 0.28 0.30 0.30 *FY 2017/18 performance is measured covering the period July 2017 through March 2618. 2.5 MAJOR TRIP GENERATORS AND PROJECTED GROWTH Major trip destinations within the city are the commercial/retail areas along McKinley Street and Sixth Street, The Crossings shopping area on Cajalco Road and Temescal Canyon, medical facilities along Magnolia Avenue, regional transit facilities off Main Street, the Corona Public Library, the Senior Center, and the Civic Center. El Cerrito Middle School and Centennial High are also major trip generators. City of Corona Transit Service Page 14 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan Cruiser patrons use the service for work, shopping trips, making stops at pharmacies and grocery stores, and accessing restaurants and movie theaters. Over the past three years, students have made up an increasing share of Corona Cruiser and Dial -A -Ride passengers. Many Dial -A -Ride passengers use the service to get to work and care centers, doctor visits, and Corona's two Metrolink Stations. CCTS staff is cautiously optimistic that the decrease in passenger trips experienced in the current Fiscal Year (July 2017 - June 2018) will start to bottom -out, and slowly improve throughout FY 2018/19. As such, a 4.8 percent increase in passenger trips — to 200,304, or 9,538 more passenger trips (made up of 6,577 more passenger trips on the Corona Cruiser and 2,961 passenger trips on Dial -A -Ride) - is projected for FY 2018/19. 2.6 EQUIPMENT, PASSENGER AMENITIES, AND FACILITY NEEDS CCTS plans to continue upgrading bus stop accessibility and passenger amenities in FY 2018/19 and FY 2019/20; planned improvements are as follows: • Battery replacement on solar -powered lighting at various bus passenger shelters. • Relocate passenger shelter from Fullerton (adjacent to Centennial High School) to the corner of Magnolia and Fullerton to serve the Blue Line WB bus stop. • Replace existing passenger shelters that display advertising with new shelters. The design of the new shelters will be based on the existing design, but re -worked to include two panels for advertising; and, • Replace older blue fiberglass bus benches with metal benches. • Add, expand, and/or replace damaged concrete at bus stops to improve accessibility. CCTS staff anticipates completing this work by 2020. Chapter 3 — Planned Service Changes and Implementation 3.1 RECENT SERVICE CHANGES Dial -A -Ride services changes include transitioning from General Public to Specialized Service serving seniors (60& older), persons with Disabilities and persons certified under ADA. This change was approved by City Council on August 17, 2017 and implemented on January 2, 2018. Following are minor service changes to fixed route service implemented January 2018: • Removed the shadow bus that was following the Blue Line in the AM leaving Walmart at 6:46 AM to Mountain Gate Park. • Replaced the El Dorado bus with the EZ Rider on the Redline 6:30 am Eastbound trip to accommodate additional riders. 3.2 RECOMMENDED LOCAL & EXPRESS ROUTE MODIFICATIONS City of Corona Transit Service Page 15 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan CCTS staff is proposing the following service enhancements in FY 2018/19: New weekday schedule — To be an effective and useful transportation option, buses need to consistently operate according to the published schedule. Bus passengers need to be able to rely on the bus to pick them up on schedule, and deliver them to their destination on schedule. An unreliable transit system will lose riders. Passenger trips peaked for the Corona Cruiser and Dial -A -Ride in FY 2013/14, and have declined since. Increased traffic congestion from a growing local and regional population, delays related to a myriad of construction projects, operational challenges, and a slow response by CCTS to adjust published schedules addressing these challenges have contributed to declining passenger trips. Increase weekday bus frequency during morning peak hours by adding an additional bus on the Blue Line and the Red Line. This will reduce headway by 30 minutes, thereby improving transit service and opportunity to increase ridership. This will provide patrons with options to utilize Corona Cruiser with additional time intervals. Implement a Free Fare Program to encourage use of public transit. CCTS staff is in the process of measuring individual trip times in an effort to devise a schedule that reflects actual trip times to assemble a new schedule. In addition, CCTS staff will release solicitation for a Comprehensive Operations Analysis (COA) to examine service delivery and efficiency. The COA will be used to formulate recommendations for service improvements that maximize ridership and service performance effectiveness in meeting the needs of the patrons. FY 18/19 budget also includes funds for planning, scheduling and run -cutting services. A new, reliable schedule, combined the completion of constructions projects, and upgrades in passenger amenities should go a long way in gaining back passengers that may have left the system for more reliable transportation alternatives. 3.3 MARKETING PLANS AND PROMOTION Marketing strategies include: Bus Shelter Program — CCTS plans to replace existing advertising shelters at 20-25 bus stops. Shelters provide bus patrons with relief from the sun during hot days, and protection from rain during inclement weather. These shelters will feature two -panels for advertising, a bench, an area for a person with a mobility device/wheelchair, and solar - powered security lighting. These new shelters will act as a destination for bus passengers, and as an ambassador as to how public transit can beautify a neighborhood and itself function as marketing tool inviting motorist to try public transit. Poetry and Art on the Bus Program — in cooperation with Centennial High and Corona High, CCTS continues to conduct poetry and art contest inviting students to submit original poetry and artwork to be displayed on the interior of Cruiser buses. Selected poems and artwork are rotated each month. The program works as an outreach effort and marketing campaign at high schools while providing a creative outlet for students. Cruiser patrons are rewarded with expressive, introspective, and entertaining poems to read and artwork to ponder during their time on the bus. The program is in its tenth year with artwork and poetry totaling 119 entries in 2018. • Free Fare Program — Implement a free fare program which will include the following programs: special free fare days, such as Bike to Work Day, Dump the Pump Day, days for targeted passengers; Fixed Route Training Program; and Summer Student Program. Offering various free fare programs allows the riders to experience the service without City of Corona Transit Service Page 16 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan cost to them with the intent the rider will continue to use the service. Low Carbon Transit Operations Program Funds will be utilized to offset the costs for this project. 3.4 BUDGET IMPACT AND PROPOSED CHANGES CCTS relies on a contribution from the City's general fund to meet the mandatory farebox recovery ratio (mandated to recover blended rate of 15 percent of operating costs through fare revenue). However, the City's general fund continues to reflect a sluggish regional economy so CCTS is incrementally increasing service next Fiscal Year to not overburden the general fund. In addition, during FY 2017/18, CCTS eliminated general use Dial -A -Ride service to reduce the farebox recovery ratio requirement from 20% to a blended rate of 15% (for both Fixed Route & DAR) and introduced federal funds for operating in an effort to reduce the general fund contribution. In addition, current contractor for transit operations is in its last year of the 5-year contract. Staff released solicitation in March 2018 and new contract is expected to start September 1, 2018. It is estimated that the cost per revenue hour will increase by 21 percent from current rate. This increase in revenue hour cost is anticipated due to additional requirements set forth in the scope of work, including: increased data collection, reporting and monitoring requirements for both operations and maintenance; additional staffing requirements to include dedicated staff for road supervision; video surveillance for money counting area; and conducting oil sampling/analysis as a quality assurance measure for revenue vehicles. The additional requirements were necessary in monitoring the No-shows, ADA requirements (phone statistics), on -time performance, and ensure state of good repair of revenue vehicles by conducting oil sampling and using a Computerized Maintenance Management System that analyzes the trends of maintenance operation. Chapter 4 — Financial and Capital Plans 4.1 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET To continue to provide Corona Cruiser fixed route and Dial -A -Ride service, CCTS is proposing a balanced budget of $2.88 million for FY 2018/19, representing a 14.6 percent increase ($368,157) over the current year FY 17-18 budget. Year -over -year increases in operating costs are largely driven by increases in administrative, materials and contracted service costs. In addition, FY 2018/19 budget includes costs for Vehicle Maintenance Oversight Project and Fixed Route Planning, Scheduling and Run -cutting project. However, the majority of the cost increase is due to higher per revenue hour cost for contracted transit operations; see section 3.4 above for more information. FY 2017-18 budget had reflected increased cost of operating more service in order to update the fixed route bus schedule. Due to competing priorities, the changes to the bus schedule did not materialize. Therefore, FY 18-19 budget will continue to reflect costs for increased revenue hour service effective January 2019 and inclusion of a Vehicle Maintenance Oversight and Fixed Route Planning, Scheduling and Run -cutting project, increasing the contracting cost by 21 percent ($377,121). In addition, FY 18-19 budget reflects a 2.7 percent increase in the cost of City of Corona Transit Service Page 17 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan marketing, materials, and utilities due to increase in advertising and additional program costs including the free fare program. These costs however are partially offset by 4.4 percent decrease in the cost of fuel (410,000). The decrease in fuel costs are attributable to replacement of five gasoline -powered vehicles with compressed natural gas vehicles in May 2018. See Budget by Category and Mode as shown below: Budget by Category and Mode RW FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Category Mode Variance SR TP Plan NLL_1_�A Salaries & Benefits Dial -A -Ride $ 186,846 $ 190,000 $ 3,154 1.7% Fixed Route $ 227,041 $ 223,000 $ (4,041) -1.8% Subtotal $ 413,887 $ 413,000 $ (887) -0.2% Materials, Marketing and Utilities Dial -A -Ride $ 38,475 $ 41,201 $ 2,726 7.1% Fixed Route $ 31,975 $ 31,172 $ (803) -2.5% Subtotal $ 70,450 $ 72,373 $ 1,923 2.7% Fuel Dial -A -Ride $ 100,000 $ 90,000 $ (10,000) -10.0% Fixed Route $ 126,000 $ 126,000 $ - 0.0% Contracted Services Subtotal Dial -A -Ride Fixed Route $ $ $ 226,000 963,000 843,100 $ $ $ 216,000 995,449 1,187,772 $ $ $ (10,000) 32,449 344,672 -4.4% 3.4% 40.9% Total Subtotal $ 1,806,100 $ 2,183,221 $ 377,121 20.9% Dial -A -Ride $ 1,288,321 $ 1,316,650 $ 28,329 2.2% Fixed Route $ 1,228,116 $ 1,567,944 $ 339,828 27.7% Total $ 2,516,437 $ 2,884,594 $ 368,157 14.6% 4.2 FUNDING PLANS TO SUPPORT PROPOSED OPERATING AND CAPITAL PROGRAM CCTS is proposing a funding plan that includes state funding (Local Transportation Fund), Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funds and Low Carbon Transportation Operations Program) to support more than 80 percent of operating costs. The remaining 20 percent will be City of Corona Transit Service Page 18 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan generated by passenger fares, bus shelter advertising, and local funds. CCTS will use State Transit Assistance, Proposition 1 B/Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement & Service Enhancement Program and Proposition 1 B/California Transit Security Grant Program funding to cover proposed capital purchases in FY 2018/19. 4.3 REGULATORYAND COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS Half Fare During Non -Peak Hours According to federal statute, transit operators must allow 1) elderly persons, 2) persons with disabilities, and 3) Medicare card holders to ride fixed route service during off-peak hours for a fare that is not more than one-half the base fare charged to other persons during peak hours. The base fare for Cruiser service is $1.50 during peak and non -peak hours. The fare for an elderly person (60+), a person with disabilities, and Medicare cardholders is $0.70 throughout the service day. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) The ADA requires that complementary paratransit service be available to ADA certified persons during the same hours and days of operation available to Cruiser (fixed route) passengers. Complementary paratransit service must be provided within % of a mile corridor from each side of a fixed route. CCTS operates a general public Dial -A -Ride that extends beyond the 3/4 mile corridor to the city limits, into the county areas of Coronita, El Cerrito, and Home Gardens, as well as satellite locations in the City of Norco (Department of Motor Vehicles, Department of Public Social Services and Norco College). When demand exceeds capacity, requests for service from ADA certified passengers receive priority. As such, CCTS maintains zero denials for ADA certified passengers. Provision of Service - ADA complementary paratransit must be provided to an ADA eligible individual, including those with temporary eligibility, a personal care attendant (PCA) if necessary, and one other individual accompanying the ADA-eligible individual, if requested. Additional companions may be provided service, if space is available. Service also must be provided to visitors. Any visitor who presents ADA eligibility documentation from another jurisdiction must be provided service. Type of Service — The ADA specifies "origin to destination" service. In certain instances, this might require service beyond strict curb -to -curb. Door-to-door assistance for ADA certified passengers is available upon request. Door-to-door service is available when: • Drivers can see the bus at all times; • The outermost door is within 150 feet from the bus; • Driver safety and security is maintained; and • Where a safe parking area is available. Fares — The ADA complementary paratransit fare cannot exceed twice the fare for a trip of similar length, at a similar time of day, on the Cruiser (fixed route system). No fares may be charged for Personal Care Attendants (PCAs). ADA certified individuals are charged $2.50 per trip which City of Corona Transit Service Page 19 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan is less than twice the fare for a trip on the Cruiser ($1.50 x 2 = $3.00). A companion is charged $2.50 per trip as well. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Pursuant to Federal Regulation 49 CFR Part 26 - Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE); all public agencies receiving U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) funds, that anticipate awarding $250,000 or more in USDOT-assisted contracts, must establish a three-year (3) overall DBE goal for potential contracting opportunities for certified Suppliers. CCTS will continue using federal section FTA 5307 funds for future projects including the use of these funds for operating and capital projects. The City submitted it's first DBE program and DBE triennial goal and methodology on December 12, 2017. The DBE goal & methodology is for federal Fiscal Years 2018-2020 (October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2020) and has received FTA concurrence on January 10, 2018. Title VI In compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, no person on the basis of race, color, or national origin, is excluded from participation in, or is denied the benefits of, or is subjected to discrimination within the scope of services offered by CCTS. The following notification to passengers of their right to file a complaint is included on the City of Corona website, service brochures, and posted on -board CCTS buses. No person shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity of the City of Corona Transit Service (CCTS). The Public Works Director is the CCTS Title VI Compliance Officer. For more information, or to file a Title VI Civil Rights complaint, contact the Corona Public Works Department by telephone at (951) 736-2266, by email at publwks@ci.corona.ca.us, or by visiting the Public Works Department at 400 S. Vicentia Avenue, Suite 210, Corona, CA 92882. The current CCTS 2018-2020 Title VI program received FTA concurrence on September 21, 2017. The next program is due on June 1, 2020. Transportation Development Act Triennial Audit CCTS underwent a Transportation Development Act (TDA) Triennial Performance Audit document review in September 2015 and site visit in October 2015 covering Fiscal Years 2012/13 through 2014/15. The triennial performance audits are administered and coordinated by RCTC. While the audit results reveal CCTS operations meeting the major goals and objectives of the TDA program, room for improvement is always paramount with the audit which suggests improvements in three areas as summarized in Table 6 Progress Implementing Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations. City of Corona Transit Service Page 20 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan Federal Transit Administration Triennial Review A Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Triennial Review field review for the period of 2014-2016 was completed in March 2017. The table on the following page describes the deficiencies and FTA's recommended corrective action. CCTS staff has responded to and corrected all deficiencies mentioned above. City received closeout letter dated April 9, 2018. Rev iew Area Defi cien cy Correct ive Act ion Submit to the FTA Region IX Office procedures for Technical Capacity Late MPRs/FFRs submitting Milestone Progress Reports (MPRs) and Federal Financial Reports (FFRs) on time Title VI program Upload the required Title VI program to the TrAMS Title VI not submitted or and notify the FTA Region IX RCRO expired Submit to FTA Region IX Office the following items: • Excess Real Property Inventory and Utilization Plan for the FTA-funded contribution to the facility that is no longer needed for transit purposes, as stated in the City's Grant Agreement, and that states how the recipient Satisfactory Real property plans to use or dispose of the excess real Continuing property. Control use issues • Identify which disposition method the City will pursue, along with a timeline, in compliance with FTA Circular 5010.1 E, Chapter IV: Real Property, Section 2.j, "Real Estate Disposition" and Section 2.j. (2), "Disposition". National Transit Database The National Transit Database (NTD) approved CCTS' request to submit transit financial and performance data through a Small Systems Waiver starting in report year 2011; the waiver is available to transit providers operating 30 or fewer buses. The submission date for Report Year 2017 was October 30, 2017. CCTS staff provided responses and clarification to NTD reviewers following the initial review. The annual NTD report for 2017 was closed out in April 2018. Alternative Fueled Vehicles (RCTC Policy) The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) encourages all Riverside County transit operators to transition from diesel -powered transit buses to alternative fuel buses. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) are recognized as preferred options. CCTS currently runs a mixed fleet of gasoline and CNG-powered buses for Dial -A -Ride. However, the City recently purchased eleven (11) buses fueled by CNG to replace aging DAR vehicles. These buses are expected to go into service May 2018. CCTS Corona Cruiser (fixed route) service operates using seven CNG-powered buses which began service in February 2016. By May/June 2018, all of CCTS fleet will be CNG-powered. City of Corona Transit Service Page 21 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan TABLES City of Corona Transit Service Page 22 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan IiNr%7di 1-o prmfim{ammsirn Bus (Motorbus) / Purchased Transportation Table Z - Fleet In ventory FY 2017118 Short Range Transit Plan City of Corona Average Lifetime # of Life to Date Miles Per Active Active # of Life to Date Vehicle Miles Vehicle As Of Lift and Fuel Vehicles Contingency Vehicle Miles through Year -To -Date Year Mfg. Model Seating Ramp Vehicle Type FY 2016/ Vehicles Prior Year End March (e.g., March) Built Code Code Capacity Equipped Length Code 17 FY 2016/17 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2016/17 2015 EDN EZ RiderII 30 7 32 CN 7 0 68,615 199,949 28,564 Totals: 30 7 7 0 68,615 199,949 28,564 Trans Track Manager'" Page 1 of I 4/30/2018 (w Table 1 - Fleet Inventory � FY 2O17118 Short Range Transit Plan CNivdi f"l-oeprhyim{ammsim City of Corona Demand Response / Purchased Transportation Average Lifetime # of Life to Date Miles Per Active Active # of Life to Date Vehicle Miles Vehicle As Of Lift and Fuel Vehicles Contingency Vehicle Miles through Year -To -Date Year Mfg. Model Seating Ramp Vehicle Type FY 2016/ Vehicles Prior Year End March (e.g., March) Built Code Code Capacity Equipped Length Code 17 FY 2016/17 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2016/17 2007 EDN AeroTech 16 1 24 GA 1 0 238,757 242,299 242,299 2012 EDN AEROTECH 20 6 26 GA 6 0 698,783 819,080 136,513 2012 EDN AEROTECH 20 4 26 CN 4 0 413,086 484,295 121,073 2008 STR Starcraft 18 1 25 GA 1 0 249,912 122,902 122,902 Totals: 74 12 12 0 1,600,538 1,668,576 139,048 TransTrack Manager— Page 1 of I 4/30/2018 Mill (w IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Table 2 -- City of Corona -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Audited Audited Plan 3rd Qtr Actual Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 14 14 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $2,151,722 $2,196,757 $2,516,437 $1,654,888 $2,884,594 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $373,850 $444,547 $368,916 $227,929 $422,153 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $1,777,873 $1,752,211 $2,147,521 $1,426,959 $2,462,441 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 215,890 198,049 201,841 143,075 200,305 Passenger Miles 920,980 853,120 864,369 613,114 858,360 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 31,969.8 31,358.0 33,118.0 22,513.2 32,456.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 394,918.0 392,383.0 397,754.0 279,310.0 381,425.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 444,317.0 439,496.0 446,082.0 312,013.0 425,811.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $67.30 $70.05 $75.98 $73.51 $88.88 Farebox Recovery Ratio 17.37% 20.24% 14.66% 13.77% 14.63% Subsidy per Passenger $8.24 $8.85 $10.64 $9.97 $12.29 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.93 $2.05 $2.48 $2.33 $2.87 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $55.61 $55.88 $64.84 $63.38 $75.87 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.50 $4.47 $5.40 $5.11 $6.46 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 6.8 6.3 6.1 6.4 6.2 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.55 0.50 0.51 0.51 0.53 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. Trans Track Manager"" Page 1 of I 5/24/2018 Mill (w IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Table 2 -- Corona -BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Audited Audited Plan 3rd Qtr Actual Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 5 5 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $987,358 $1,010,669 $1,228,116 $779,188 $1,567,944 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $187,521 $216,248 $240,084 $105,230 $226,087 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $799,837 $794,422 $988,032 $673,958 $1,341,857 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 152,728 132,469 139,715 98,660 138,124 Passenger Miles 603,276 523,253 551,874 389,707 545,590 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 14,660.0 14,626.2 16,344.0 10,908.4 16,681.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 171,379.0 172,070.0 176,912.0 130,103.0 182,186.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 188,192.0 186,901.0 192,204.0 141,870.0 198,602.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $67.35 $69.10 $75.14 $71.43 $94.00 Farebox Recovery Ratio 18.99% 21.40% 19.54% 13.51% 14.41% Subsidy per Passenger $5.24 $6.00 $7.07 $6.83 $9.71 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.33 $1.52 $1.79 $1.73 $2.46 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $54.56 $54.32 $60.45 $61.78 $80.44 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.67 $4.62 $5.58 $5.18 $7.37 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 10.4 9.1 8.5 9.0 8.3 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.89 0.77 0.79 0.76 0.76 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. Trans Track Manager"" Page 1 of I 5/24/2018 Mill (w IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Table 2 -- Corona-DAR -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Audited Audited Plan 3rd Qtr Actual Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 9 9 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $1,164,365 $1,186,088 $1,288,321 $875,699 $1,316,650 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $186,329 $228,299 $128,832 $122,698 $196,066 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $978,036 $957,789 $1,159,489 $753,001 $1,120,584 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 63,162 65,580 62,126 44,415 62,181 Passenger Miles 317,705 329,867 312,495 223,407 312,770 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 17,309.8 16,731.8 16,774.0 11,604.8 15,775.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 223,539.0 220,313.0 220,842.0 149,207.0 199,239.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 256,125.0 252,595.0 253,878.0 170,143.0 227,209.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $67.27 $70.89 $76.80 $75.46 $83.46 Farebox Recovery Ratio 16.00% 19.25% 9.99% 14.01% 14.89% Subsidy per Passenger $15.48 $14.60 $18.66 $16.95 $18.02 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $3.08 $2.90 $3.71 $3.37 $3.58 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $56.50 $57.24 $69.12 $64.89 $71.04 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.38 $4.35 $5.25 $5.05 $5.62 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 3.6 3.9 3.7 3.8 3.9 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.28 0.30 0.28 0.30 0.31 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. Trans Track Manager"" Page 1 of I 5/24/2018 limid[ fom 1prwim{mvmsim Data Elements Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics City of Corona -- 3 FY 2018/19 All Routes Peak Passenger Revenue Total Revenue Total Operating Passenger Net Route # Day Type Vehicles Passengers Miles Hours Hours Miles Miles Cost Revenue Subsidy COR-BLUE All Days 3 68,100 268,996 8,246.0 8,690.0 85,627.0 93,343.0 $775,092 $111,763 $663,329 COR-DAR All Days 9 62,181 312,770 15,775.0 18,914.0 199,239.0 227,209.0 $1,316,650 $196,066 $1,120,584 COR-RED All Days 2 70,024 276,594 8,435.0 8,889.0 96,559.0 105,259.0 $792,852 $114,324 $678,528 Service Provider Totals 14 200,305 858,360 32,456.0 36,493.0 381,425.0 425,811.0 $2,884,594 $422,153 $2,462,441 Trans Track Manager'" Page 1 of 2 5/24/2018 IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Performance Indicators Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics City of Corona -- 3 FY 2018/19 All Routes Operating Operating Farebox Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost Per Recovery Subsidy Per Passenger Revenue Revenue Passengers Passengers Route # Day Type Revenue Hour Revenue Mile Passenger Ratio Passenger Mile Hour Mile Per Hour Per Mile COR-BLUE All Days $94.00 $9.05 $11.38 14.41% $9.74 $2.47 $80.44 $7.75 8.3 0.80 COR-DAR All Days $83.46 $6.61 $21.17 14.89% $18.02 $3.58 $71.04 $5.62 3.9 0.31 COR-RED All Days $94.00 $8.21 $11.32 14.41% $9.69 $2.45 $80.44 $7.03 8.3 0.73 Service Provider Totals $88.88 $7.56 $14.40 14.63% $12.29 $2.87 $75.87 $6.46 6.2 0.53 Trans Track Manager'" Page 2 of 2 5/24/2018 TABLE 3A - INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS AND AREA SERVICED Mode Route Description Service Area/Sites Corona Cruiser McKinley Street shopping areas, Magnolia Avenue, WalMart at McKinley Street Centennial High, Medical Facilities, Senior Center, Blue Line West to River Run Apartments Corona Library, Corona Transit Center/North Main via Mountain Gate Park and Corona Metrolink Station, Circle City Center downtown/Civic Center (Community Center), North Main Street shopping area and restaurants The Crossings shopping area, Walmart, California The Crossings shopping area Avenue Post Office, Centennial High, Corona Transit at Cajalco Road and Temescal Center/North Main Corona Metrolink Station Red Line Canyon Road to the Walmart (selected AM & PM trip), Corona Library, Senior at Neighborhood Market at Center, Civic Center, Corona High and Walmart West Sixth Street via Neighborhood Market on West Sixth Street near downtown/Civic Center Smith Avenue. Service is extended to The Shops at Dos Lagos on Saturdays. Dial -A -Ride City-wide, neighboring county areas of Coronita, El Cerrito and Home Gardens as well as the following City -Wide Demand Response / statellite locations in the City of Norco: Department Reservation based service of Motor Vehicles, Department of Public Social Services, Brunswick Classic Lanes, Target and Norco College City of Corona Transit Service Page 30 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE 4 - SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED FOR FY 2018119 Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2018/19 Capital State of Good AQMD AB 2766 Project Description Project Total Amount of LTF STA 5307 Funds 5339 Funds Toll Credits Repair (SGR) LCTOP Subvention Fare Box* Other ** No. Funds FY 17-18 Funds Funds FY 18- Operating Revenues $ 1,892,306 $ 1,400,153 $ 100,000 $ 15,000 $ 298,700 $ 78,453 Capital Cost of Operating for Fixed Route & $ 792,288 $ 158,458 $ 633,830 Dial -A -Ride Vehicle Maintenance Oversight Project $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Fixed Route Planning including scheduling and $ 150,000 $ 120,000 $ 30,000 runcutting Subtotal: Operating $ 2,884,594 $ 1,678,611 $ - $ 633,830 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 15,000 $ 298,700 $ 108,453 Intelligent Transportation System 19-01 $ 500,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000 Route Development Buses(3) 19-02 $ 950,000 $ 190,000 $ 760,000 Purchase ADA accessible Van 19-03 $ 48,039 $ 48,039 Support Equipment and Software 19-04 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Subtotal: Capital $ 1,508,039 $ - $ 300,000 $ 1,160,000 $ - $ - $ 48,039 $ - $ - $ - $ - Total: Operating & Capital $ 4,392,633 $ 1,678,611 $ 300,000 $ 1,793,830 $ - $ - $ 98,039 $ 100,000 $ 15,000 $ 298,700 $ 108,453 * Includes AB 2766 congestion and emission reduction funds to incentivize Cruiser multi -day passes $15,000. **Other revenues include City contribution $99,059; Bus Shelter Advertising $7,000; and local contribution $10,000. 298,700.00 Pax Fares 7areBox 15,000.00 AB 2766 Subsidy 313,700 7,000.00 Shelter advertising Other $91,453 Gen'I Fund 10,000.00 Local contribution 108,453.00 Total 422,153 City of Corona Transit Service Page 31 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICA TIOA' FY 2018/19 SUP Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: 19-01 FTIP No: not assigned — new project PROJECT NAME: Intelligent Transportation System (ITS)) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase and install an Intelligent Transportation System that will support the following GPS based components: 1) Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL); 2) Automated Vehicle Annunciator System (AVAS); 3) Computer Aided Dispatching (CAD) and; 4) Automated Passenger Count (APC). The system will improve performance monitoring, and reporting capabilities, and improve service quality and bus efficiency. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The ITS is necessary as an effort to ensure customers are receiving the highest quality information on time as well as ensuring that CCTS is operating at optimal efficiency. Start Date Completion Date July 2019 June 2021 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED)_ CCTS is requesting Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funds with State Transit Assistance (STA) as match funds. (STA) capital funds. Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount FTA FY 2018/19 $400,000 STA FY 2018/19 $100,000 Total $500,000 '�•"�• I C �• •'I 1 FTA Grant No. FTIP ID No. RCTC/SRTP Project No. Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/17) Not applicable City of Corona Transit Service Page 32 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan FY 2018/19 SUP Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: 19-02 FTIP No: not assigned — new protect PROJECT NAME: Route Development Buses PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This request provides funds to purchase two Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) buses to be used in Corona Cruiser Fixed Route Service. These buses will be wheelchair accessible, capable of carrying two bicycles and have up to twenty seats. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Corona residents are requesting more fixed route service. Additional buses are required to operate more frequent services and/or additional bus routes. The buses proposed here will be used as route development vehicles. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date January 2019 June 2020 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTEDL CCTS is requesting Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funds with State Transit Assistance (STA) as match funds. Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount FTA FY 2018/19 $760,000 STA FY 2018/19 $190,000 Total $950,000 FTA Grant No. FTIP ID No. RCTC/SRTP Project No. Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/18) 5-3 Purchase Cruiser $65.000 City of Corona Transit Service Page 33 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan FY 2018/19 SUP Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: 19-03 FTIP No: not assigned — new protect PROJECT NAME: Purchase ADA accessible van PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase an ADA accessible van to transport passengers/wheelchair to support the current Dial -A -Ride Program. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Transporting few passengers (or one wheelchair) may be more efficient using a smaller vehicle rather than a larger vehicle such as a cutaway. Start Date Completion Date Jan 2019 June 2020 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED)_ CCTS is requesting State of Good Repair Funds. Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount SGR FY 2017/18 $48,039 Total $48,039 FTA Grant No. FTIP ID No. RCTC/SRTP Project No. Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/17) Not applicable City of Corona Transit Service Page 34 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan FY 2018/19 SUP Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: 19-04 FTIP No: not assigned — new protect PROJECT NAME: Support Equipment and Software PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide funding for miscellaneous support and office equipment as needed for operations and administrative functions. Support equipment may include office furniture, photocopier, computer equipment and other auxiliary equipment. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Much of the support equipment are in need of replacement as they are exceeding their useful life. Start Date Completion Date July 2018 December 2020 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTEDL CCTS is requesting State Transit Assistance funds. Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2018/19 $10,000 Total $10,000 FTA Grant No. FTIP ID No. RCTC/SRTP Project No. Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/17) Not applicable City of Corona Transit Service Page 35 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE 5.1 -SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED FOR FY 2019120 Table 5.1- Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2019/20 Capital FTA AQMD AB 2766 Project Description Project Total Amount of LT [5307 Funds 5339 Funds Toll Credits State of Good LCTOP*** Subvention Fare Box* Other ** Funds Repair (SGR) No. Funds FY 18- Operating Revenues $ 2,043,072 $ 1,471,992 $ 150,000 $ 15,000 $ 304,914 $ 101,166 Capital Cost of Operating for Fixed Route & $ 873,531 $ 174,706 $ 698,825 Dial -A -Ride Vehicle Maintenance Oversight Project $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Subtotal: Operating $ 2,966,603 $ 1,646,698 $ - $ 698,825 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ 15,000 $ 304,914 $ 101,166 Route Development Bus (1) 20-01 $ 475,000 $ 354,503 $ 120,497 Purchase ADA accessible Van 20-02 $ 51,961 Subtotal: Capital $ 475,000 $ - $ 354,503 $ - $ 120,497 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total: Operating & Capital $ 3,441,603 $ 1,646,698 $ 354,503 $ 698,825 $ 120,497 $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ 15,000 $ 304,914 $ 101,166 Section 5339 Funds include FY 16/17 ($60,497) and estimated FY 17/18 funds ($60,000). * Includes AB 2766 congestion and emission reduction funds to incentivize Cruiser multi -day passes $20,000. **Other revenues include City contribution $83,860; Bus Shelter Advertising $7,000; and local contribution $10,000. 304,914.00 Pax Fares Fare Box 15,000.00 AB 2766 Subsidy 319,914 7,000.00 Shelter advertising Other $84,166 Gen'I Fund 10,000.00 Local contribution 101,166.00 Total 421,080 City of Corona Transit Service FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan Page 36 of 45 TABLE 5.1A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION FY 2019/20 SRTP Table 5.1 A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: 20-01 FTIP No: not assigned — new project PROJECT NAME: Route Development Bus PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This request provides funds to purchase one Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) bus to be used in Corona Cruiser Fixed Route Service. These buses will be wheelchair accessible, capable of carrying two bicycles and have up to twenty seats. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Corona residents are requesting more fixed route service. Additional buses are required to operate more frequent services and/or additional bus routes. The buses proposed here will be used as route development vehicles. Start Date Completion Date January 2019 June 2020 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTEDI: CCTS is requesting State Transit Assistance (STA) capital funds and FTA Section 5339 funds. Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2019/20 $354,503 FTA 5339 FY 2016/17 $ 60,497 FTA 5339 FY 2017/18 $ 60,000 Total $475,000 FTA Grant No. FTIP ID No. RCTC/SRTP Project No. Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/18) City of Corona Transit Service Page 37 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan FY 2019/20 SUP Table 5.1 A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: SRTP Project No: 20-02 FTIP No: not assigned — new project PROJECT NAME: Purchase ADA accessible van PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Purchase an ADA accessible van to transport passengers/wheelchair to support the current Dial -A -Ride Program. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Transporting few passengers (or one wheelchair) may be more efficient using a smaller vehicle rather than a larger vehicle such as a cutaway. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date Jan 2019 June 2020 Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount SGR FY 2018/19 $51,961 Total $51,961 1 M TO ' C • W 13: • 1 \ 1 • ' FTA Grant No. FTIP ID No. RCTC/SRTP Project No. Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/17) City of Corona Transit Service Page 38 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE S. 2 - SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED FOR FY 2020121 Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2020/21 Capital AQMD AB 2766 Project Description Project Total Amount of LTF STA ;307 Funds 5339 Funds Toll Credits State of Good LCTOP*** Subvention Fare Box* Other ** Funds Repair (SGR) No. Funds FY 18 - Operating Revenues $ 2,075,583 $ 1,498,367 $ 150,000 $ 15,000 $ 310,946 $ 101,270 Capital Cost of Operating for Fixed Route & $ 881,094 $ 176,218.8 $ 704,875 Dial -A -Ride Vehicle Maintenance Oversight Project $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Subtotal: Operating $ 3,006,677 $ 1,674,586 $ - $ 704,875 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ 15,000 $ 310,946 $ 101,270 5 5 5 S 5 5 Subtotal: Capital $ - $ $ $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ - Total: Operating & Capital $ 3,006,677 $ 2,674,586 $ - $ 704,875 $ - $ - $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ 15,000 $ 310,946 $ 101,270 * Includes AB 2766 congestion and emission reduction funds to incentivize Cruiser multi -day passes $20,000. **Other revenues include City contribution $70,000; Bus Shelter Advertising $7,000; and local contribution $10,000. 310,946.28 Pax Fares Fare Box 15,000.00 AB 2766 Subsidy 325,946 7,000.00 Shelter advertising Other 84,270.00 Gen'I Fund 10,000.00 Local contribution 101,270.00 Total 427,216 City of Corona Transit Service Page 39 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE 6 - PROGRESS IMPLEMENTING TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS* Audit Recommendations (Covering FY 2012/13 to FY 2014/15) Action/Remedy The rate of no-shows has averaged over 8 percent on the Dial -A -Ride service which is above general industry norms (generally below 5 percent). The City's Dial -A -Ride is open to the general public; general public rides comprise close to 20 percent and seniors and disabled individuals comprise slightly over 80 percent. No-shows affect the timeliness and efficiency of service delivery in the areas of service hours and on -time performance. The City and the FTA agreed that any future no-show policy would not take into account no-shows caused by reasons beyond the rider's control, and would only suspend riders who truly had established a pattern or practice of no-shows. A pattern or practice involves intentional, repeated, or regular actions, not isolated, accidental, or Revise the no-show policy in singular incidents. conformance with FTA The City should continue efforts to revise its no-show policy, which provides a findings deterrent for repeat violators. The City and the contract operator should take the necessary steps to revise the no-show policy in a way that addresses the FTA's concern, and include the policy in transit brochures and on the website. The RTA no-show policy outlines example steps for evaluating patterns and the process for violations of the policy: It considers a customer's overall frequency of use, and establishes "a pattern of practice of abuse" that is relative to how often a person travels. The overall no-show rate for all customers is considered so that customers with average no-show records are not penalized. CCTS staff rolled out the No -Show policy and procedure during FY 2017/18. The policy was vetted through FTA Civil Rights Office. The current farebox standard for Corona Transit is a 20 percent ratio system- wide. This ratio is met by the combination of both fixed route and Dial -A -Ride services. Other local contributions from the City have made up the difference between passenger fares and revenue needed to meet the required ratio. The local contributions have a cap on how much can be provided to transit. TDA allows alternative farebox recovery ratios for urban systems. One Review alternative farebox alternative is a split farebox standard: one for fixed route, and another for Dial - standards under the TDA A -Ride. The fixed -route standard would still be 20 percent; however, the Dial - A -Ride standard could be reduced to 10 percent. The caveat with the alternative lower Dial -A -Ride standard is that it applies only to service for seniors and disabled. This means the Dial -A -Ride would need to switch from general public to a specialized service. As noted above, seniors and disabled individuals currently comprise slightly over 80 percent of the Dial -A -Ride ridership. By complying with a lower farebox standard for Dial -A -Ride, the City might be able to reallocate its transit funds to support enhanced and more City of Corona Transit Service Page 40 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan productive service and/or possibly reduce its reliance on the local contribution. The alternative farebox standard and the change from general public to specialized Dial -A -Ride should be evaluated by the City as a means to further strengthen its ability to maintain the farebox recovery. Any change to the farebox would need to be formally approved by RCTC as required by TDA. On August 17, 2017 City Council approved the transition of General Public Dial -A -Ride to Specialized Dial -A -Ride in an effort to reduce the farebox recovery ratio to a blended rate of 15 percent. The Specialize Service went into effect January 2, 2018. Passengers certified under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) currently comprise about 25 percent of all Corona Dial -A -Ride passengers. Another 40 percent of riders are disabled but are not ADA-certified. A call must be made to schedule each ride on Corona Dial -A -Ride. Subscription service is a convenience offered to ADA paratransit passengers who take the same trip on a regular basis, as it reduces the need to make repeated calls for each ride. Many agencies have subscription service trips (i.e., having a standing reservation scheduled) that make up a portion of their trip requests. Subscription service trips generally are trips that a patron makes multiple times per month, often multiple times per week, and have a specific origin and destination that do not change. Most often, these types of trips are for employment, medical, and/or educational purposes. These trips can be prescheduled, thus reducing the burden on the scheduler/dispatcher and call Review feasibility of in -take system. implementing ADA ADA subscription service is generally on a space -available basis, and scheduled on a first -come, first -served basis for a given time period (e.g., 14 or 30 days of subscription service). Federal ADA law permits the use of subscription service as long as it does not absorb more than 50 percent of the available trips at a given time of day, and does not result in next -day ADA trip denials. Subscription service is discretionary and not mandated under ADA, which allows the City to investigate its feasibility through a demonstration period to determine whether additional scheduling efficiencies through the new scheduling software can be made, as well as whether there is some reduced staff and cost burden from the number of calls for reservations. CCTS staff work with current contractor (provider of transportation services) and review feasibility of establishing an ADA Subscription Services Policy. After review and consideration, City will proceed with adopting the policy. *Recommendations from the FY 2013-FY 2015 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Triennial Performance Audit. City of Corona Transit Service Page 41 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan limid[ ("1-o prwim{mvmsim Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2017/18 Short Range Transit Plan Review City of Corona Data Elements FY 2017/18 Plan FY 2017118 Target FY 2017/18 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 201,841 Passenger Miles 864,369 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours 33,118.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 397,754.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 446,082.0 Total Operating Expenses $2,516,437 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $368,916 Net Operating Expenses $2,147,521 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio 14.66% >= 20.00% 1 13.77% 1 Fails to Meet Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $75.98 <_ $72.17 $73.51 Fails to Meet Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $10.64 >_ $8.11 and <_ $10.97 $9.97 Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $2.48 >_ $1.89 and <_ $2.55 $2.33 Meets Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour $64.84 >_ $51.19 and <_ $69.25 $63.38 Meets Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile $5.40 >_ $4.11 and <_ $5.55 $5.11 Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 6.10 >= 5.36 and <= 7.25 6.40 Meets Target iMeetsTarget 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.51 >= 0.43 and <= 0.59 0.51 Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators Productivity Performance Summary: Service Provider Comments: A farebox recovery ratio in this range is anticipated at this point in the fiscal year. At the close of each fiscal year, the City contributes a sufficient amount of funding to bridge the gap required to meet the farebox recovery ratio. This will also reduce subsidy per passenger, thereby meeting the target. The farebox recovery requirement has been reduced from 20 to a blended rate of 15 percent due to transitionin the Dial -A -Ride Program from General Public to Specialized Service. TransTrack Manager- Page 1 of I 5/24/2018 FY 2018/19 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report lliyi li (wiry l-ueprwim(anRsim Service Provider; City of Corona All Routes Performance Indicators FY 2016/17 End of Year Actual FY 2017/18 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2018/19 Plan FY 2018/19 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 198,049 143,075 200,305 None Passenger Miles 853,120 613,114 858,360 None Revenue Hours 31,358.0 22,513.2 32,456.0 None Total Hours 34,405.7 24,612.9 36,493.0 None Revenue Miles 392,383.0 279,310.0 381,425.0 None Total Miles 439,496.0 312,013.0 425,811.0 None Operating Costs $2,196,757 $1,654,888 $2,884,594 None Passenger Revenue $444,547 $227,929 $422,153 None Operating Subsidy $1,752,211 $1,426,959 $2,462,441 None Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $70.05 $73.51 $88.88 <_ $75.05 Fails to Meet Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $5.60 $5.92 $7.56 None Operating Costs Per Passenger $11.09 $11.57 $14.40 None Farebox Recovery Ratio 20.24% 13.77% 14.63% >= 15.0% Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Passenger $8.85 $9.97 $12.29 >_ $8.47 and <_ $11.47 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $2.05 $2.33 $2.87 >_ $1.98 and <_ $2.68 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $55.88 $63.38 $75.87 >_ $53.87 and <_ $72.89 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $4.47 $5.11 $6.46 >_ $4.34 and <_ $5.88 Fails to Meet Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour 6.30 6.40 6.20 >= 5.44 and <= 7.36 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.50 0.51 0.53 1 >= 0.43 and <= 0.59 Meets Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2018/19 Plan to the FY 2018/19 Primary Target. TransTrack Manager- Page 1 of 1 5/24/2018 TABLE 9 — CCTS HIGHLIGHTS FY 2018119 Operations • Improve Fixed Route Service o Adjust Corona Cruiser bus schedule to reflect actual trip times. o Introduce additional morning peak service o Implement a Free Fare Program • Improve Dial -A -Ride Services o Eliminate general DAR o Review feasibility of establishing an ADA Subscription Services Policy • New contract for transit operations o Solicitation released March 17, 2018 • Work with the City's contract transportation operator to improve: o Operations of Corona Cruiser and Dial -A -Ride service; o Bus maintenance and cleanliness/maintenance of bus stops; and o Monitoring and verifying contractor performance. • Conduct a Comprehensive Operational Analysis to identify strengths as well as opportunities for improvements • Seek services for fixed route planning, scheduling and run -cutting Capital Projects • Bus stop improvements — replace batteries on solar -powered lighting TABLE 9A — OPERATING AND FINANCIAL DATA FY FY FY FY FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Performance Measure 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 Est Planned System -wide Passenger Trips 238,597 234,318 215,890 198,049 190,767 200,305 Cost per Service Hour $66.30 $68.55 $70.13 $70.07 $75.87 $88.88 City of Corona Transit Service Page 44 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE 9B — FAREBOX REVENUE CALCULATION (Consistent with Riverside County Transportation Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Farebox Recovery Ratio Revenues FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 Est. FY 2018/19 Plan Passenger Fares $372,165 $338,282 $323,593 1 $293,147 $298,700 Interest Income $4,214 $27,627 $0 $0 $0 General Fund Contribution $32,500 $54,001 $78,000 $59,616 $91,453 Measure A $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Passenger Shelter Advertising Revenue $10,426 $7,977 $7,421 $7,000 $7,000 Gain on Sale of Capital Assets $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CNG Revenues $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Lease/ Other Revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Federal Excise Tax Refund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Investment Income $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CalPers CERBT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Revenues $17,061 $27,008 $35,534 $12,500 $25,000 Total Farebox Revenues $436,366 $454,895 $444,548 $372,263 $422,153 Total Operating Expense $2,170,801 $2,242,025 $2,196,759 $2,277,555 $2,884,594 Farebox Recovery Ratio* 20% 20% 20% 16% 15% *On August 17, 2017, City Council approved transition of General Public Dial -A -Ride to Specialized Service; Farebox recover ratio decreased from 20% to system wide blended rate of 15%. City of Corona Transit Service Page 45 of 45 FY 2018-19 Short Range Transit Plan lachella-San Uniminnio Pa-S R momprW7,Ply" ,r COACHELLA VALLEY- SAN GORGONIO PASS RAIL CORRIDOR SERVICE ter. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION LOMM]SSION TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 — SYSTEM OVERVIEW...................................................................1 1.1 Description of Service Area....................................................................1 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections....................................2 1.3 Fixed Route Services..............................................................................2 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure .............................2 1.5 Revenue Fleet........................................................................................2 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities..........................................................2 1.7 Existing Coordination Between Transit Agencies...................................3 CHAPTER 2 — EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE .................6 CHAPTER 3 — PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION .......6 CHAPTER 4 — FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS............................................6 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget................................................................6 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program ....6 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements............................................6 CHAPTER 5 — SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROCESS .............................7 5.1 Task 1: Detailed Work Plan, Budget, and Outreach Plan .......................8 5.2 Task 2: Preliminary Service Planning and Alternatives ..........................8 5.3 Task 3: Environmental Documentation...................................................9 5.4 Task 4: Service Development Plan.......................................................13 5.5 Project Management............................................................................14 Table 1 — Fleet Inventory..................................................................................16 Table 2 — SRTP Service Summary...................................................................16 Table 2A — Summary of Routes to Be Excluded in FY 2018119.....................16 Table 3 — SRTP Route Statistics......................................................................16 Table 3A — Individual Route Descriptions......................................................16 Table 4 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2018/19...............................17 Table 5.1 — Summary of Funds Requested in FY 2019/20 .............................19 Table 5.1 A — Capital Project Justification.......................................................20 Table 5.2 — Summary of Funds Requested in FY 2020/21 .............................21 Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification.......................................................22 Table 6 — Update Actions Taken or To Be Implemented to Comply with the Most Recent Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations .....................22 Table 7 — Service Provider Performance Target Report................................22 Table 8 — FY 2018/19 SRTP Performance Report...........................................22 Table 9A — Highlights of FY 18/19 SRTP.........................................................23 Table 9B — Fare Revenue Calculation.............................................................23 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION LOMM]SSION GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS BNSF BNSF Railways CEQ Council of Environmental Quality CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CETAP Community & Environmental Acceptability Process CMAQ Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Funds CVAG Coachella Valley Association of Governments DEIS Draft Environmental Impact Statement EA Environmental Assessment EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EOM Extra -Ordinary Maintenance FEIS Final Environmental Impact Statement FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration HSIPR High -Speed Intercity Passenger Rail IEOC Inland Empire -Orange County Line LAUS Los Angeles Union Station LOSSAN Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo Rail Corridor Agency LTF Local Transportation Funds Metro Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority MOW Maintenance -of -Way NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NOA Notice of Availability NOI Notice of Intent NTD National Transit Database OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority PA&ED Project Approval and Environmental Document PRCIP Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan PTC Positive Train Control PTMISEA Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION LOMM]SSION PVL Perris Valley Line RCTC Riverside County Transportation Commission ROD Record of Decision RTA Riverside Transit Agency RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Program SB Senate Bill SBCTA San Bernardino County Transportation Authority SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCRRA Southern California Regional Rail Authority SDP Service Development Plan SJBL San Jacinto Branch Line SR State Route SRTP Short Range Transit Plan STA State Transit Assistance Funds STIP State Transportation Improvement Program STP Surface Transportation Program Funds TVM Ticket Vending Machine UP Union Pacific Railroad VCTC Ventura County Transportation Commission RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CHAPTER 1 — SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.1 Description of Service Area The proposed Coachella Valley —San Gorgonio Rail Corridor (Corridor) runs from Los Angeles to Indio through four Southern California counties: Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino. The Corridor refers to the approximately 141-mile long rail corridor between Los Angeles Union Station (LAUS) and the city of Indio. The Corridor consists of two segments: the western 59-mile long segment between LAUS and Riverside/Colton, and the eastern approximately 82-mile segment between Riverside/Colton and Indio. It is anticipated that alternate routes between Los Angeles and the Riverside/Colton area be analyzed. This would include possible routes along the BNSF Railway (BNSF) San Bernardino Subdivision, the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Alhambra or Los Angeles Subdivision, and the Metrolink San Gabriel Subdivision. C"J'hlTl LL II� = Anpd"s 1 4nI" S1atJaq� W W ' r w LAIC .Y n.rr� y� 3.1,1 S_�:dil:C:JI; V :'1'J,Irf IruH�+ wln yn.r. LEGEND SCRRA San Gahrlel Suh Union Pacific RA Alhambra Sub i Railway San Bernardino Sub Union Pacific RRA na Sub Un ion Pazi be RR Las Angeles Sub tlasrntown 5ar Bernardino Passenger Rad Project Redlands Passenger Rail Project r r rJ:ISiI?'! i1 r►'^P �" rhea-Na P.4m Indio �r To ensure that planning considers the interrelationships of the broader regional rail network, the following segment(s) and/or services beyond the Corridor shall be considered to the degree necessary to fully inform the service development planning process and service environmental work for the Corridor: 1. Amtrak Sunset Limited (Los Angeles to New Orleans via Phoenix) 2. Amtrak Southwest Chief (Los Angeles to Chicago via Riverside) 3. Amtrak Pacific Surfliner Trains (San Diego to San Luis Obispo) 4. Commuter Rail Operations Metrolink (Serving Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties) 5. Future daily intercity service between Los Angeles and Phoenix via Coachella Valley R= RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 — 2020/21 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 6. Local and regional bus connections 7. High Speed Rail future plans 1.2 Population Profile and Demographic Projections The proposed intercity passenger rail service would provide a conveniently scheduled link to the greater metropolitan areas of Southern California for the communities in the fast-growing Coachella Valley and Banning Pass areas. It will also provide Los Angeles and Orange County residents' access to the world class Coachella Valley visitor destinations and festivals. In addition, it will provide lifeline access on routes not serviced by other means to key destinations such as the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Loma Linda. The market analysis performed as part of the Final Alternatives Analysis, July 25, 2016, identified a projected 47% increase in travel over the next 20 years between Los Angeles and Coachella Valley and a projected 23% population increase by 2035 for the four counties comprising the Corridor (Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino). Coachella Valley is expected to double its population and the population of the San Gorgonio Pass Area is projected to increase by 134% by 2035. Numerous disadvantaged communities exist within the Corridor that could benefit from a significant improvement in regional mobility and a health benefit from reduced vehicle emissions from an intercity passenger rail service. 1.3 Fixed Route Services Two daily roundtrips are proposed for initial service. The running time between Los Angeles and Indio is 3 — 3.5 hours, with a proposed maximum speed of the service is 79 miles per hour (mph). Connections will be provided to The Pacific Surfliner daily intercity service at the Fullerton Station, and Metrolink's Inland Empire -Orange County (IEOC) Line at the Riverside — Downtown Station. Connections to Metrolink's San Bernardino Line could also be made at the Riverside — Downtown Station with rail or bus transfers. 1.4 Current Fare Structure and Proposed Fare Structure Proposed fares have not been determined at this time. 1.5 Revenue Fleet Fleet requirements have not been determined at this time. 1.6 Existing Facility/Planned Facilities The proposed Coachella Valley Corridor intercity service will stop at three existing Metrolink/Amtrak stations: LAUS, Fullerton, and Riverside — Downtown. Five additional existing or new stations are proposed between Riverside and Indio. Options include: RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ■ Redlands/Loma Linda (new station) ■ Banning/Beaumont/Cabazon (new station) ■ Palm Springs (existing Amtrak station) ■ Mid Valley (new station) ■ Indio (existing bus station and planned intermodal station) 1.7 Existing Coordination Between Transit Agencies A coordinated process will involve affected railroad owners, operators, and funding partners, including: ■ Major Partners: Divisions within the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), including Rail, Planning, Mass Transportation, and Transportation Systems Information; and Caltrans District 8 ■ Project Partner: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) ■ Railroad Owners: UP, BNSF, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), and San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) ■ Regional Transportation Planning Agencies: Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) ■ Regulatory Agencies: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Bureau of Land Management (potentially), ■ Intercity Rail Agency/Operator: (Los Angeles — San Diego — San Luis Obispo) LOSSAN Joint Powers Authority/Amtrak ■ Commuter Rail Agency/Operator: Southern California Regional Rail Agency (SCRRA)/Metrolink Providing passenger rail service to the Coachella Valley has been a long-standing priority for more than two decades. The first studies for such a service were completed in the early 1990's. Additional studies have been performed over time with one of the more recent efforts completed in April 2010. This study was completed through coordination by CVAG, the Commission, and Schiermeyer Consulting Services and adopted by the CVAG Executive Committee on October 25, 2010. On November 10, 2010, the Commission reaffirmed its formal support for implementation and expansion of intercity Amtrak rail service to the Coachella Valley and directed staff to coordinate with CVAG and local communities to advocate for the service. To follow up on that effort, the RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 3 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Commission adopted a formal Resolution No. 11-001 in support of Amtrak's plan to run the Sunset Limited daily through the Coachella Valley. On July 1, 2010, the FRA published its Interim Program Guidance for the High -Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Program in the Federal Register Volume 75 No. 126 Notices. Caltrans was selected through this competitive grant program for planning funds to conduct the State Rail Plan, which includes the proposed service that is the subject of this scope. As part of its planning processes, Caltrans conducted the Coachella Valley Intercity Rail Corridor Planning Study, which examined the viability of the provision of intercity passenger rail service between Los Angeles and Indio and recommended the preparation of a Service Development Plan (SDP) to determine the range of, and ultimately, select a preferred service option for the corridor. The SDP entails the following requirements: ■ Clearly demonstrate the purpose and need ■ Analyze alternatives for the proposed passenger rail service ■ Identify the alternative that best meets the purpose and need ■ Identify the discrete capital projects required ■ Demonstrate the operational and financial feasibility Both Caltrans and FRA have been working to either develop or approve such SDP's for corridors throughout the country and offered some very helpful suggestions on how to conduct the planning effort. CVAG MOU and TDA Funding At its September 30, 2013 meeting, the CVAG Executive Committee approved a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Commission and CVAG to establish a funding split of Coachella Valley Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds. All of these TDA funds are currently allocated to SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine), and the intent is to allocate 10 percent of the STA discretionary portion of the TDA funds, using a phased -in approach, in order to support a Coachella Valley Rail program. The intent of the MOU is to allow the Commission to set aside those State Transit Assistance (STA) funds into a Coachella Valley Rail fund to be used only for capital costs to improve stations, staff support, as well as funding for technical studies. This funding split is to be phased in as follows: FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 and thereafter 5 percent of the STA portion of the TDA funds 7 percent of the STA portion of the TDA funds 10 percent of the STA portion of the TDA funds TDA funds are utilized on a wide variety of transportation programs throughout the state including Riverside County. These activities include planning and programming activities, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, community transit services, public transportation, and transit projects. Historically, TDA funds have not been set aside for passenger rail. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 4 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION However, technical work will continue on development of the Los Angeles to Coachella Valley corridor in the State Rail Plan. This work will demonstrate the Coachella Valley's commitment toward implementing a robust rail program and, thereby, serve as a lever to unlock federal and state sources of funding and other support for necessary environmental work, as well as future operations funding. SunLine is the only designated public transit operator in the Coachella Valley currently authorized by the state to receive these funds. SunLine has been involved in the development of this plan and is working in partnership with the Commission and CVAG in order to promote close coordination of bus and rail needs so that both programs operate successfully. The MOU with CVAG will support a Coachella Valley Rail fund. These funds would be internally maintained at the Commission in a separate account while expenditures would be authorized by CVAG's Executive Committee. This would be similar to current arrangements for the Coachella Valley Highway and Regional Arterial program where the Commission acts as a fiscal agent pursuant to Measure A, but actual expenditures are authorized by CVAG. CVAG Executive Committee decisions regarding the Coachella Valley Rail fund would only impact passenger rail projects within the Coachella Valley. The Coachella Valley Rail fund would initially be used to improve stations with projects that have independent utility, provide funding for technical studies, and limited project management staff support. These funds are currently being used as matching funds to the FRA grant that is completing the Service Development Plan and Environmental Documents. Annual Project Update and FRA Grant Status As the project has progressed, there have been many significant accomplishments including the award of a $2.9M FRA Planning Grant announced on April 16, 2015. This grant allowed the project to seamlessly continue from Phase 1 to Phase 2. As described below the project has many elements to complete for the overall Service Development Plan. As of the end of FY18 the following has been completed: ■ Initial Project Outreach and Scoping ■ Public Open House Meetings ■ Stakeholder TAC Meetings ■ Market Analysis ■ Purpose and Need Document ■ Alternatives Analysis ■ Phase 2 scoping and planning ■ FRA Grant Development ■ Initiated Tier 1 Environmental ■ Environmental Scoping Meetings and Report ■ Initiated Service Development Plan ■ Basis of Design Report RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CHAPTER 2 — EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE Section not applicable. CHAPTER 3 — PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION Section not applicable. CHAPTER 4 — FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget An operating and capital budget does not exist at this time. 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program Potential sources of funding for capital and operational costs have not been identified at this time. 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements Section not applicable. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CHAPTER 5 — SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROCESS The Commission is leading the planning efforts for the SDP and environmental documents, utilizing a combination of state and local funds. A large portion of the funding is from the State Proposition 1 B Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) Program. Due to the complexity of service development programs, extensive pre -construction preparation is required, including service planning, environmental review, and conceptual engineering efforts. The first phase of this process, known as the Planning Phase, is the development of the Passenger Rail Corridor Investment Plan (PRCIP). The PRCIP provides information in support of a future decision whether to fund and implement a major investment in a passenger rail corridor. It consists of two components: 1) An environmental document and analysis of the proposed rail service, which in the case of the Corridor will either be an Environmental Assessment (EA) or a Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to satisfy both the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. 2) A Service Development Plan. Together, the environmental document and SDP complete the PRCIP, which would provide information to support a potential future FRA decision whether to fund and implement a major investment in the Corridor. For the purposes of this scope of work, the term "Project" means the completion of the SDP and environmental work activities exclusively for initial planning of the Corridor. Also for the purposes of this scope of work, the term "Corridor Program" means final design, environmental clearance, and construction work activities required to implement service along the corridor. The period of performance for all work will be estimated by the Contractor selected for each task and approved by the Commission with key milestones identified. The anticipated deliverables associated with this scope are as follows: Task 1: Detailed Work Plan, Budget, and Outreach Plan ■ Detailed Project Work Plan (with budget) and Outreach Plan (Complete) Task 2: Preliminary Service Planning and Alternatives ■ Purpose and Need Statement (Complete) ■ Technical Memo on Criteria and Methodology (Complete) ■ Alternatives Analysis Report (Complete) Task 3: Environmental Documentation ■ Draft Notice of Intent (NOI) ■ Agency and Stakeholder Involvement Plan ■ Final Purpose and Need Statement RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ■ Scoping Report ■ Impact Analysis Methodology ■ Annotated Environmental Document Outline ■ Administrative Draft Environmental Document ■ Draft Environmental Document and Draft Notice of Availability (NOA) ■ Administrative Final Environmental Document ■ Final Environmental Document and Draft NOA ■ Draft Record of Decision (ROD) Task 4: Service Development Plan ■ Technical Memo on SDP Outline and Methodology ■ Draft SDP ■ Final SDP 5.1 Task 1: Detailed Work Plan, Budget, and Outreach Plan In May 2013, Caltrans completed the first phase of a planning study and initial alternatives analysis for the rail corridor. This planning study was very supportive of the potential for a viable service. The Stakeholder and Public Outreach plan was completed in August 2014. It outlined the outreach plan for agencies and elected officials, which included Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meetings, briefings, conference calls, status updates, email communication, and one-on-one meetings. It also included project communication efforts, which resulted in: ■ Updated website with a new "Contact Us" section to facilitate feedback ■ Facebook page to allow ongoing updates and two-way communication with public ■ Updated fact sheets and ongoing status updates ■ Public meetings 5.2 Task 2: Preliminary Service Planning and Alternatives In July 2016, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) completed a final Alternatives Analysis that involved six elements: ■ A market analysis to understand the current and future travel demand in the Corridor ■ Project need and purpose ■ Service alternatives ■ Screening criteria ■ Two-step screening analysis RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ■ Alternatives to carry forward for additional study LEGEND ow PUM00 W 11rnw sub wear` "".. .,� fry■r hN f �■ lk��RAru,sl5u6 ...4.k � rrr� Un��Si[Ii15 I114W �LEf}}44 Munn SICT10II WtUDYAMIA Results from Alternatives Analysis with alignment planned for Phase 2. 5.3 Task 3: Environmental Documentation The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental assessment (EA) or an environmental impact statement (EIS) may be completed either after or in parallel to the SDP process. The Commission staff has hired HDR (Contractor) to conduct both the SDP and the NEPA documentation to expedite project development. The EIS recommendation considers the various alternatives for implementing the proposed passenger rail service, the conceptual engineering for construction projects necessary to implement those service alternatives, and the potential environmental impacts that may be associated with those projects at a general level of detail appropriate for the Corridor Program. This effort will meet both NEPA and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. Extensive coordination with the regulating agencies that will be reviewing and certifying these documents must be incorporated in all aspects of this task. This includes working with the FRA in scoping, reviews, publishing notices of intent (NOI), etc. NEPA/CEQA Scoping and Outreach In coordination with the Commission, the Contractor will conduct the scoping process to initiate the Environmental Documents, which will include - Identification of the Corridor study area ■ Development of a NOI to prepare an EIS ■ Development of the Agency and Stakeholder Involvement Plan RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 — 2020/21 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ■ Holding scoping meetings with the public, stakeholders, and other agencies ■ Finalization of the Purpose and Need Statement ■ Preparation of a scoping report ■ Coordination with FRA and other approving authorities A draft NOI will need to be prepared to initiate the scoping process. As part of scoping, the Purpose and Need Statement, and the set of proposed alternatives detailed in the Alternatives Analysis Report will be refined through input from the public, government agencies, and other stakeholders. The Contractor, in coordination with the Commission, will develop the final Purpose and Need Statement for the Corridor Program and refine the set of proposed alternatives to be considered for further analysis in the environmental documents. To concurrently comply with CEQA requirements the scope of work needs to include preparation of a notice of preparation, draft and final environmental impact report (EIR), notice of completion, CEQA findings, statement of overriding considerations (if necessary), State Clearinghouse process, and related requirements. The Contractor will prepare and implement, in coordination with the Commission, the Agency and Stakeholder Involvement Plan. The plan will outline the public and agency involvement program and will identify key contacts within agencies, public officials, affected Native American Tribes, and other key stakeholder groups and the public. The plan will also identify key contacts with civic and business groups, relevant interest groups, present and potential riders/users, and private service providers/shippers. The plan will identify how involvement activities will be linked to key milestones in the planning and environmental analytic process, including public hearings on the draft EIS. This process will include all the elements to fulfill FRA's Section 106 responsibilities including tribal coordination. The Contractor will submit the Draft Public Involvement Plan for the Commission review. The final plan will be revised based on received comments and resubmitted to the Commission for approval. In addition, the Contractor will initiate the scoping process, in cooperation with the Commission, and will invite participation from federal, state, and local agencies, Native American tribes, other interested parties, and the public, as identified in the Agency and Stakeholder Involvement Plan. The Contractor will record the process and provide a summary of comments, responses, and conclusions in a scoping report for the Commission review and approval. Deliverables: ■ Draft NOI; Agency and Stakeholder Involvement Plan for the Commission review and acceptance ■ Final Purpose and Need Statement for the Commission review and approval ■ Scoping report for Commission review and acceptance ■ Continued FRA coordination, review and approvals as necessary RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Environmental Document & Section 4(f) Analysis The Contractor will prepare environmental document and focus on the likely environmental effects for the entire corridor relating to the type of service being proposed for the identified range of reasonable alternatives. The analysis of impacts will be based upon the conceptual engineering. The Contractor will prepare the environmental document as per NEPA, and comply with CEQA requirements. The Contractor will propose a methodology for impact analysis to the Commission for review and approval prior to commencing the work. The Contractor will include impacts at a general level of detail for the Corridor associated with: ■ Route alternatives ■ Cities and stations served ■ Train service levels and frequency ■ Train technology ■ Train operating speeds ■ Ridership projections ■ Major infrastructure components Studies to be conducted as part of the NEPA evaluation process for the Corridor Program may include the following (A final list will be determined in conjunction with the Commission in the work plan and estimated budget) ■ Air quality ■ Water quality ■ Noise and vibration ■ Solid waste disposal ■ Ecological systems ■ Impacts on wetlands areas ■ Impacts on endangered species or wildlife ■ Flood hazards and floodplain management ■ Coastal zone management ■ Use of energy resources ■ Use of other natural resources, such as water, minerals, or timber ■ Aesthetic and design quality impacts ■ Possible barriers to the elderly and handicapped ■ Land use, existing and planned ■ Environmental Justice ■ Public health ■ Public safety, including any impacts due to hazardous materials ■ Recreational opportunities ■ Socioeconomic ■ Historic, archeological, architectural, and cultural ■ Transportation ■ Potential impacts to Section 4(f)-protected properties RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 11 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Construction period impacts The Contractor, in conjunction with Commission, will also identify strategies to avoid, minimize, or mitigate identified impacts. This will include coordination with appropriate resource agencies throughout the NEPA/CEQA process to manage any impacts identified during the development of the environmental document. Specific mitigation strategies will be developed and included in the environmental document as necessary by resource area, based on the following approaches: ■ Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; ■ Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation; ■ Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment; ■ Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; and ■ Compensating for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. This task will also include preparation of the environmental document. The Contractor will prepare an annotated outline of the proposed document for Commission review and approval. The Contractor will then prepare an administrative draft for Commission and FRA review and approval. Modifications to the administrative draft requested by Commission will be incorporated to produce a draft for circulation. The Contractor will prepare and submit to Commission a draft notice of availability (NOA) for the draft document. The Contractor will also distribute the draft document to agencies and stakeholders, as outlined in the Agency and Stakeholder Involvement Plan. In addition, the Contractor will coordinate with FRA and other respective agencies to publish the NOI, Draft EIS (DEIS), NOA, Final EIS (FEIS), and ROD in the Federal Register as required. The Contractor, in close coordination with Commission and FRA, will respond to comments from the draft document and prepare the final document. The Contractor will prepare an administrative final document for FRA review and approval. Modifications to the administrative final document requested by FRA will be incorporated to produce a final document for circulation. The Contractor will prepare and submit to FRA a draft NOA. The Contractor will also distribute the final document to agencies and stakeholders, as outlined in the Agency and Stakeholder Involvement Plan. Additionally, the Contractor, in coordination with FRA, will identify the next steps required in the environmental process, including identifying the necessary Tier-2 project -level NEPA documents required. The commitments agreed upon by the agencies throughout the NEPA process will be included in the draft ROD, which the Contractor will submit to FRA for review and consideration. A constant line of communication between the Contractor and Commission will be maintained throughout the entire NEPA process. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 12 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Deliverables: ■ Impact analysis methodology for FRA review and acceptance ■ Annotated EIS outline for FRA review and acceptance ■ Administrative draft document for FRA review and comment ■ Draft document and draft NOA for FRA review and approval ■ Administrative final document for FRA review and comment ■ Final document and draft NOA for FRA review and approval ■ Draft ROD 5.4 Task 4: Service Development Plan The Contractor will produce a SDP for the final selected alternative in close coordination with the Commission and FRA. The SDP will lay out the overall scope and approach for the proposed service by clearly demonstrating the purpose and need for new rail service; analyzing alternatives for the proposed new service and identifying the alternative that would best address the identified purpose and need; demonstrating the operational and financial feasibility of the alternative proposed to be pursued; and describing how the implementation of the SDP will be divided into discrete phases. Specifically, the Contractor will include within the SDP: ■ Purpose and need, including a description of the transportation challenges and opportunities faced in the markets to be served by the proposed service. ■ Service rationale to demonstrate how the proposed service can cost-effectively address transportation and other needs, based on current and forecasted travel demand and capacity condition. ■ Planning methodology used in developing the SDP. ■ Identification of alternatives, including rail improvements, improvements to other modes including bus, and a no -build alternative. ■ Operations modeling, including railroad operation simulations, equipment and crew scheduling analyses, and terminal, yard, and support operations, which in turn reflect such variables as travel demand and rolling stock configuration. If the proposed service shares facilities with rail freight, commuter rail, or other intercity passenger rail services, the existing and future characteristics of those services will be included. ■ Station access and analysis to address the location of the stations to be served by the proposed service, how these stations will accommodate the proposed service, how passengers will access the stations, and how the stations will be integrated with connections to other modes of transportation. ■ Demand and revenue forecasts, including the methods, assumptions, and outputs for travel demand forecasts, and the expected revenue from the service, including ridership/revenue forecasts that specify the number of passengers and board ings/disembarking at stations. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 13 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Financial performance and projections for each phase of service, including operating costs and revenues, capital replacement costs, and other institutional arrangements affecting the system finances. The SDP will address the methods, assumptions and outputs for operating expenses for the train service including maintenance of way, maintenance of equipment, transportation (train movement), passenger traffic and services such as marketing, reservations/information, station, and on -board services, general/administrative expenses, cost -sharing arrangements, and access fees. Capital programming at a level sufficient to identify necessary infrastructure improvements and to determine the cost estimates. This would include equipment, infrastructure improvements, facilities, and other investments required for each discrete phase of service implementation. Cost -benefit analysis of the Project, which shall include such factors as the Project's estimated ridership and anticipated user and public benefits, relative to the proposed investment, and consideration of enhanced mobility, environmental, and economic benefits (both for the specific Project proposal and in terms of the costs and benefits generated by the specific Project within a network context). Additional benefits should be analyzed such as job creation and retention, "green" environmental outcomes, potential energy savings, and effects on community livability. The Contractor will prepare a technical memo that includes the proposed annotated outline for the Corridor Program SDP and details the proposed methodology for analyzing the required SDP components. Contractor will submit the technical memo to the Commission for review and approval. Upon approval, the Contractor will develop a draft SDP for Commission review and approval utilizing the agreed upon outline and methodology. The Contractor will incorporate the Commission comments into the final SDP for the Corridor Program. Deliverables: Technical memo on SDP Outline and Methodology for FRA review and acceptance Draft SDP for FRA review and approval Final SDP 5.5 Project Management The Contractor is responsible for facilitating the coordination of all activities among the Commission, relevant host railroads, and FRA for implementation of the Project. The Commission will monitor and evaluate the Project's progress through the administration of regular progress meetings scheduled throughout the Project's duration. As part of the Project's administration, the Contractor will: RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ■ Hold regularly scheduled Project meetings with Commission. ■ Maintain the Administrative Record for the Project, to be submitted to FRA upon Project completion. A Project master file will contain copies of reports, correspondence, and other documents and will be compiled and recorded in the Administrative Record. ■ Perform periodic Project status reviews and meetings with relevant stakeholders at various locations within the Project area including the Coachella Valley. ■ Comply with Commission Project reporting requirements, including: o Status of Project by task breakdown and percent complete o Changes and reason for change in Project's scope, schedule and/or budget o Description of unanticipated problems and any resolution since the immediately preceding progress report o Summary of work scheduled for the next progress period o Updated Project schedule RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Table 1 — Fleet Inventory Table 2 — SRTP Service Summary Table 2A — Summary of Routes to Be Excluded in FY 2018/19 Not Applicable. Table 3 — SRTP Route Statistics Data is currently not available from SCRRA at this time. Table 3A — Individual Route Descriptions RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 16 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Table 4 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2018/19 Project Description Capital Project Number Total Funds Total Funds w/o Carryover LTF FRA Grant Prop 1 B (PTMISEA) STA(1) Other CV General Rail Management FY 19-1 350,000 - 350,000 Subtotal: Capital 350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 Total: Operating & Capital $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 (1) STA amount matches transfer amount in FY19 Budget Documents Revised 3/19/18 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 — 2020/21 17 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 19 - 1 PROJECT NAME: CV General Rail Management PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This Project will provide the following: Cover the PA&ED or Environmental Documentation that is separate from the SDP along with portions of the SDP. It will also cover additional planning and local match needed for the FRA Grant as we move forward. It will also cover any incidental RCTC agency costs related to the project salaries, etc. that are not eligible to be reimbursed through the Prop 1 B or FRA grant. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is funded by local funds subject to the Coachella Valley rail split to fund the environmental study. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): STA (Coachella Valley Rail Split) $350,000 Total $350, 000 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 18 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Table 5.1 — Summary of Funds Requested in FY 2019/20 Project Description Capital Project Number(') Total Funds Total Funds w/o Carryover LTF STA Transfer In Other CV General Rail Management 20-1 300,000 - 300,000 Subtotal: Capitall 300,000 - 300,000 - - Total: Operating & Capital 1 1 300,00011 1 300,0001 - RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 19 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Table 5.1 A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 20 - 1 PROJECT NAME: CV General Rail Management PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This Project will provide the following: Cover the PA&ED or Environmental Documentation that is separate from the SDP along with portions of the SDP. It will also cover additional planning and local match needed for the FRA Grant as we move forward. It will also cover any incidental RCTC agency costs related to the project salaries, etc. that are not eligible to be reimbursed through the Prop 1 B or FRA grant. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is funded by local funds subject to the Coachella Valley rail split to fund the environmental study. This project will not include Proposition 1 B PTMISEA funding. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): STA (Coachella Valley Rail Split) $300,000 Total $300, 000 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 20 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Table 5.2 — Summary of Funds Requested in FY 2020/21 Capital Total Funds Project Total Funds w/o LTF STA Transfer In Other Project Description Number(') Carryover CV General Rail Management�2) 21-1 300,000 300,000 Subtotal: Capital $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 21 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER: FY 21 - 1 PROJECT NAME: CV General Rail Management PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This Project will provide the following: Cover the PA&ED or Environmental Documentation that is separate from the SDP along with portions of the SDP. It will also cover additional planning and local match needed for the FRA Grant as we move forward. It will also cover any incidental RCTC agency costs related to the project salaries, etc. that are not eligible to be reimbursed through the Prop 1 B or FRA grant. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This project is funded by local funds subject to the Coachella Valley rail split to fund the environmental study. This project will not include Proposition 1 B PTMISEA funding. PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): STA (Coachella Valley Rail Split) $300,000 Total $300, 000 Table 6 — Update Actions Taken or To Be Implemented to Comply with the Most Recent Triennial Performance Audit Recommendations Not Applicable. Table 7 — Service Provider Performance Target Report Not Applicable. Table 8 — FY 2018/19 SRTP Performance Report Not Applicable. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 22 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Table 9A — Highlights of FY 18/19 SRTP • Continued efforts on Service Development Plan • Continued efforts on Environmental Impact Documents Table 9B — Fare Revenue Calculation Not Applicable. RCTC RAIL SRTP FY 2018/19 - 2020/21 23 FINAL DRAFT PVVTA Blythe Calif. 1978 - 2018 PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY (PVVTA) BLYTHE, CALIFORNIA SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2 018/ 19 - 2 02 0/21 FINAL DRAFT 5/23/2018 Table of Contents System Overview Page 3 Service Area Demographics Profile of Services System Map Page 4 Fare Schedule Page 5 Maintenance & Facilities Page 6 Emergency Reserve Fleet Facilities Coordination Page 7 Services & Performance Page 8 Blue Route 1 - City of Blythe Circulator Gold Route 2 - Palo Verde College Crosstown Red Route 3 - CA Prisons Express Green Route 4 - Rural Rider Silver Route S - Saturday Service Premier Route 6 - Blythe Wellness Express Desert Road TRIP - Trip Reimbursement PVVTA X-Tend-A-Ride Performance Page 17 Planning Page 17 Service Changes Page 18 Route Changes and Modifications Community Engagement Page 19 Financial & Capital Plans Page 20 Operating Budget Capital Budget Regulatory and Compliance Page 20 2 System Overview Service Area Geographically, the Palo Verde Valley is located approximately 170 miles east of Riverside along Interstate 10 at the Colorado River. The service area is primarily based within the City of Blythe, and the unincorporated Riverside County areas of Mesa Verde and Ripley. Also, part of the greater area is the California State prison facilities of Ironwood and Chuckawalla, approximately 20 miles west of the valley along Interstate 10. Also, PVVTA provides premier service to and from Coachella Valley. Demographics The valley's population is approximately 18,565 residents. Population growth in the valley decreased at an average of about two percent per year but this trend is slowing over the last year. The valley is agriculturally diverse providing many outdoor jobs and direct support to the local community. Major employers include; the Ironwood State Prison, Chuckawalla Valley State Prison, the Palo Verde College and the Palo Verde Hospital. Profile of Services The Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA) provides many transit options to serve senior citizens, persons with disabilities, and the general public. PVVTA services are known to the general public under the marketing name "Desert Roadrunner". PVVTA provides five deviated fixed routes in the Palo Verde Valley, which serve Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde, Palo Verde College, California Department of Corrections facilities, and limited service to Ehrenberg, Arizona. ADA Para -transit is also provided after hours on the Fixed Routes through route deviation requests. The routes can deviate up to 3/4 of a mile away from the actual mapped routes. Hours of operation for the Fixed Route system are Monday through Friday from 5:00 am to 6:45 pm, and 8:00 am to 12 noon on Saturdays and limited holidays. PVVTA operates a non -emergency medical service to the Coachella Valley from Blythe called the Blythe Wellness Express (BWE). The Transportation Reimbursement and Information Project provides transportation reimbursement to individuals unable to access PVVTA Fixed Route services. The PVVTA's transit services are contracted with Transportation Concepts of Irvine, California. Transportation Concepts has been providing transit service for PVVTA since October of 2003. PVVTA also has an agreement with the Independent Living Partnership to administer the (Desert RoadTRIP) that has been in place since 1995. 3 W z W Q 45 w 4Q W In oc W W yy W y/ J `J JJh d V a v P 1 i CD cc CD 0 E m to co System Map 4 Fare Schedule PWTA's fare structure is sensitive to the local economy while attempting to maintain the mandated 10 percent Farebox Recovery Ratio. The schedule includes full fare and discounted ride tickets. P'WTA's fare schedule will increase by six percent (6%), effective July 1, 2018. In fiscal year 2018/19, staff will analyze the farebox recovery ratio and fare structure to determine if any further fare change is necessary. PWTA Fare & Pass Schedule Fixed Route Cash Fare - Routes 1, 2, 4, 5 General Public (ages 5-59 years old) $ 1.75 Seniors (ages 60 years or older) $ 0.85 Persons with Disabilities (with ADA Card) $ 0.85 Children ages 5 and under* (first boarding with full fare adult) Free Children ages 5 and under* (second & third boarding with Full fare adult) $ 0.85 * First (1) child Free, $0.85 for child 2 & 3 boarding with a fare paying adult; Full Fare for all other accompanying children. Arizona Zone Fare for travel to and from Ehrenberg, Arizona General Public, Seniors, & Persons with Disabilities Fixed Route Cash Fare - Route 3 Express General Public, Seniors, & Persons with Disabilities Route Deviations (one way to or from route) Route Deviations - All Fixed Routes Route Deviations (one way to or from route) DVS Card (8 one way deviation fares)*** 'Not valid for initial passenger fare, only for payment of route deviation fee. Fixed Route Go Passes 10-Ride Punch Pass S/D 10-Ride Punch Pass General Public 31-Day Pass Seniors 31-Day Pass Persons with Disabilities Summer Youth Pass 10-Ride Punch Pass 10-Ride Punch Pass 20-Ride Punch Pass General Public 31-Day Pass (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Routes 1, 2, 3 Local, 4 & 5) (Ehrenberg, Arizona) (Route 3 Express) (Route 3 Express) (Route 3 Express) Other Cash Fare - X-Tend-A-Ride & Blythe Wellness Express (BWE) X-Tend-A-Ride General Public, Seniors, & Persons with Disabilities BWE General Public, Seniors, & Persons with Disabilities One -Way BWE General Public, Seniors, & Persons with Disabilities Roundtrip $ 5.00 $ 3.50 $ 0.85 $ 17.50 $ 8.50 $ 45.00 $ 30.00 $ 30.00 $ 40.00 $ 50.00 $ 35.00 $ 70.00 $125.00 $ 5.00 $ 10.00 $ 15.00 Maintenance & Facilities PWTA operates vehicles using Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and gasoline. The fleet consists of eight active revenue generating transit buses and five support vehicles. Most of the buses are interchangeable between routes. When vehicles are retired, they are declared surplus property and sold by way of auction. PWTA adheres to all Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and California Highway Patrol (CHP) mandated Preventive Maintenance Inspection criteria and is very proactive in maintenance efforts. Vehicle maintenance is provided under contract with Transportation Concepts. Emcip,encY Reserve Fleet As PWTA adds new vehicles into service, older units are rotated into an emergency contingency fleet that would be implemented only as needed for emergency and public safety use. With extreme heat conditions and remote location in the Palo Verde Valley, a reserve fleet would better prepare the community in times of power outages where these vehicles would be used to transport affected residents to cooling centers within the area. For other emergency events such as floods or the breakdown of larger passenger buses on Interstate 10, this fleet would be able to assist with a large movement of passengers to safety, freeing up local law enforcement to better deal with the situation at hand. Facilities PWTA continues to improve the Operations Center and the Main Street Park N Ride (PNR). This facility allows users the comfort of a "one stop" shop for all their transportation needs. Over the last few years, Low Carbon Transit Operations Program funds are being used to improve the PNR lot to improve passenger safety and comfort. Most recently, PVVTA submitted a project application for State of Good Repair (SGR) grant funds for installation of an outdoor shade structure for use to maintain alternative fleet vehicles. A shade structure would allow for fleet vehicles to be maintained in a safe, secure shaded area adjacent to the current maintenance facility. The Blythe CNG Station has proven to be a great resource to local and regional fuel needs for Compressed Natural Gas. Since the station opened in 2014, a steady increase in the number of vehicles especially commercial fleets has been seen monthly. Currently, PWTA staff is working on expanding the station to accommodate the ever-growing demand for CNG along the Interstate 10 corridor. PWTA has seen vehicles use the station from travelers as far away as Canada who use this strategic route due to the reliability in CNG fuel availability. Expansion of the station took place in 2017 with an investment of $361,858 funded by the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD). The expansion provides for double the original capacity of the station and further reliability through better redundancy in equipment. 6 Coordination PVVTA actively coordinates service with Quartzsite Transit (QTS) who operates the Camel Express providing one fixed route in the PWTA Service Area. QTS provides service from Quartzsite Arizona three times a week and connects with the PWTA system at the DPSS Transfer Center. QTS and PWTA meet on occasion to address any operational issues and to provide joint training exercises to staff. These exercises include emergency training, operations and administration support development. Active coordination with Sunline was achieved for the success with the Blythe Wellness Express (BWE). Sunline provides operational emergency support for the BWE when the bus operates in the Sunline services area. During a potential incident, Sunline seamlessly assisted with bringing the BWE service back to normal and safe. With the 100+ mile one- way trip, the BWE requires extra support to ensure the most safe, comfortable and reliable service for the riders from the Palo Verde Valley. PWTA is a member of CalACT a statewide, non-profit organization that has represented the interests of small, rural, and specialized transportation providers since 1984. Membership is comprised of individuals and agencies from diverse facets of transportation, including operators of small and large systems, planning and government agencies, social service agencies, suppliers and consultants. PWTA participates actively with CalACT members and has been part of conference panels promoting concerns of extremely rural transit operators. Other member agencies frequently interact with PWTA on regional and State issues facing public transit. SH/111fle TNANS/7 AGENCY Services & Performance PWTA strives to be a community -based transit provider taking into consideration the needs and concerns of locals and stakeholders who serve the Palo Verde Valley. PWTA participates in several local advocacy committees from all aspects of community service. PVVTA is active in Homeless support, community safety, the Blythe Area Chamber of Commerce and numerous civic groups. The best way to serve the community is to be side by side through all the ups and downs of the folks who ride the bus, count on services and support the Agency in turn. -� , L Blue Route 1- Deviated Fixed Route City of Blythe Circulator Blue Route 1 serves the growing community of Blythe providing riders access to many civic, educational and county sponsored public social service offices within the City of Blythe. Destinations on Blue Route 1 include: Blythe City Hall, County offices, Albertsons, Rite Aid, Palo Verde Hospital, Palo Verde Unified School District schools, Employment Development Department, Department of Motor Vehicles, Post Office, Blythe Central Garage and Public Works Department, California Highway Patrol, Senior Nutrition Program, Palo Verde Valley District Library, and various other shopping locations within the community. The route can deviate for passengers up to 3/4 of mile with a 30-minute advance reservation or upon boarding. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe and at two major transfer points, DPSS Transfer Center and Social Security (SSA) Transfer Center. Blue Route 1 operates deviated service in a clockwise loop type of route providing a 60- minute frequency with one bus, five days a week. Blue Route 1 operates from 6:25 am to 5:40 pm Monday through Friday. Services are not provided on the following days: Weekends and all Agency observed holidays. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2019 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 2020 Implement an opposite bus on the same route with 30-minute headways during peak hours. 2021 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 10t" Ave 7 N. BROADWAY Chanslorwa B rnard i.i Y C13 7th HobsonwaY ENCINAS �-0 J CO 14t" Ave c' 01 Gold Route 2 - Deviated Fixed Route Palo Verde College Crosstown Gold Route 2 provides riders access between the city of Blythe and Palo Verde College. This feeder route provides connections to many civic, educational, and county sponsored public social service offices, Blythe City Hall, County offices, Albertsons, Rite Aid, Palo Verde Hospital, Colorado River Fair, Employment Development Department, Blythe Recreation Center, Palo Verde Valley District Library, Palo Verde College main campus, and various other shopping locations within the community. The route can deviate for passengers up to 3/4 of mile with a 30-minute advance reservation or upon boarding. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe and at two major transfer points, DPSS Transfer Center and other major trip generators. Gold Route 2 operates on a two-way route providing a 60-minute frequency with one bus, five days a week. Gold Route 2 operates from 6:45 am to 6:40 pm Monday through Friday. Services are not provided on: weekends and all Agency -observed holidays. This route does not operate when the college is not in session. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2019 Discontinue the Desert Preparatory Academy tripper, staff will continue to monitor service. 2020 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 2021 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. PV College 6' Ave Barnard KMART Murphy iz Hobsonway 7th INTAKE 10 Red Route 3 r- Deviated Fixed Route CA Prisons Express The Red Route 3 provides premium commuter service between Blythe and ChuckawalIa Valley & Ironwood State Prisons, Monday through Friday with three AM and three PM trips. This route serves four Park-N-Ride lots, travels down Hobsonway to Mesa Drive, then travels via Interstate 10 to the prisons. The Red Route 3 operates from 5:15 am to 7:30 am and again from 2:00 pm to 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday. Services are not provided on the following days: Weekends and all Agency or State observed holidays. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe and at two major transfer points, DPSS Transfer Center and Social Security (SSA) Transfer Center. Special fares are charged on this route. All passengers pay $3.30 one way. There are 10 and 20 ride GoPasses available, as well as a $120.00, 31-Day GoPass which gives unlimited rides on all Desert Roadrunner buses for the month. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2019 Reduce service to, two AM and two PM trips daily; staff will continue to monitor service. 2020 Look at the feasibility of implementing different modes of transportation for servicing the Prison facilities. 2021 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service MESA EA PRISONS PNR SR-78 KMART 2 ® ..�* rr = A& 1-10 Hobsonway 11 Green Route 4 - Deviated Fixed Route Rural Rider The Green Route 4 provides deviated fixed route service between Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde, and Ehrenberg, Arizona. This route serves four Park-N-Ride lots, travels down Hobsonway to State Route 78, then travels South to Ripley, West to Mesa Verde via Interstate 10 and services Ehrenberg, Arizona. The Green Route 4 operates four round trips 6:30 am to 6:55 pm Monday through Friday. Services are not provided on: weekends and all Agency or State observed holidays. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe and at two major transfer points, DPSS Transfer Center and other major trip generators. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2019 Implement a mid -day tripper to Mesa Verde and Ripley. 2020 No proposed changes; continue to monitor service. 2021 Expand evening service if feasible. MESA 410 SR-78 KMART 7th RIPLE EHRENBERG ��myMO J, RIVIERA 12 Silver Route 5 - Deviated Fixed Route Saturday Service The Silver Route 5 provides system -wide deviated fixed route service within the city of Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde, and selected trips to Ehrenberg, Arizona. This route serves all major trip -generating areas within the system on 90-minute headways. The Silver Route 5 operates 8:00 am to 12:10 pm Saturday and Agency observed holiday operating days. Services are not provided on: Monday through Friday and all Agency - observed non -operating holidays. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2019 No proposed changes; continue to monitor service. 2020 No proposed changes; continue to monitor service. 2021 Look at subsidizing trips on other transportation modes such as taxi and ride sharing. MESA K-MART 7th EHRENBERG 41. � mo TSR78 Hobsonway RIPLEY♦ 13 Premier Route b - Blythe Wellness Express Non -Emergency Medical Service to the Coachella Valley The Blythe Wellness Express fixed route will provide service fixed route/point deviation service between the City of Blythe and medical facilities in the Coachella Valley. The service includes one morning trip leaving the Main Street Park -and -Ride in Blythe at 6:30 am, Monday, Wednesday and Friday, and arriving back in BIythe at 4:00 pm. This route will provide services to Desert Center (upon request) for pick up and drop off of passengers, with a rest stop at Chiriaco Summit. Continue to Sunline Division 2, Indio; John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Indio; Westfield Palm Desert; Eisenhower Medical Center, Rancho Mirage; and Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs. After the last drop off at Desert Regional Medical Center, the bus will deadhead to Sunline Division 2 in Indio and run the route for pickup of passengers and head back to Blythe. This service is not provided on weekends and Agency and State observed holidays. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2019 Finish out the pilot program in FY19, service will go to one day a week. 2020 Changes will be made according to finding from demo period. 2021 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. SCHEDULE: Mmda,, w.3r-dq —d FrW.J ONr Y FARE lit"all talwa ea Te C..bdb vilift Alte.er:FiMb®aib • Wo-Wq alum • 2a 1 t" i..a &Y1 stsm all Mdn sm Park d Rkle 6:30 AM rail.'. Hithaay I11 A Flom I a01•lt Ma. Vd k 6-.4D AM Smliae D iia ck k' the bus hl fljvthe r1Qrf Cary Fhw [Nfin 7:15 wM IaAo: JFtc H-o"d 1d01 rat Cl 6amwlt Rat Sloa 7tMAM a. -A. J11bati, 1AsPU (hanslorsr ladiu: JhidhWaY 1 I I I FJ.— ll !la+dmaa Md. cu Yyt�Todd WlLLNESS EIPRIBB U �-.ierCrn er ants wa nnr Pak .. _ Mad.Cm .aril.: IF'K Hwpa.l l:YBAM arrnartl ReservaWn and Advance RaarL. CMA—1 lr Rc.r Ssoy 30PA1 8->d AAd• FarePay- .equired. hltnnl Med. Cants elgvr t'alar Rn. (>R s:m rM p� Pease call at least 2 days F'.� Ill g;J6 Atr Ms V-& 316 A.st InadvanQafynurtrip Desw ftiudw Mad. Camel Bbaft Main Saes nut A Ride am PM nand, date.760AU.Tf10 -1� - —. Mlmge I�d1a p�,t To India • Ce•Ite+ Chlrhaco .J Mesa Verde Blythe Sumach •seh cdlLY 03m m.x cymY .1, Ill need to go somewhere we don't serve, Val City the Weftem Exprim Take You? you can connect from our bus to the Sunline Scheduled S Cadichil Vl LetioTransferCente Palm tem sysal oneofthreetransferpolnls -Indiq Springs Rancho Mirage and Palm Springs. StuhLirseKlnd G ® [] JFK Medical Center, Indio Ramon J$�S�I,�E 0 Eisenhower Medkar Center, Rancho Mirage t Tnrnwmr 0 Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs E Cathedral p 21 st Century Oncology, Palm Desertand a city Rancho Mirage Rancho ® e © Desert Heart physicians, Palm Springs Mirage .1 © Desert Medical Imaging, Indian Wells r © Desert Pathology Medical Group, Palm Springs m 13 Dr. OrisbachOncology Center, Rancho Mirage [U� � Indio io0 KaiserPermanenteMedicalOR-ices,Indio %yljlg 0 Kaiser Permanenle Medical tfl'ices, Palm Springs COahGi110 V4 CYdli6r Ill © Lucy Curd Cancer Center, Rancho Mirage Destinationsllo 11 © VA Owl Palm Desert La qulnta 14 Desert Road TRIP Trip Reimbursement PVVTA's Desert RoadTRIP program currently provides reimbursement to individuals who do not have access to local transportation. Desert RoadTRIP will be marketed and promoted in conjunction with Independent Living Partnership to seniors (age 60 years or older), persons with disabilities and truly needy persons who live outside the service area, such as Lost Lake, resort communities along U.S. Highway 95, and Desert Center. Desert RoadTRIP participants can travel up to 460 miles a month, including using Greyhound (690 miles for a family). This equals $147.20 per month ($220.80 for a family per month). In Fiscal Year 2016/17, the TRIP program provided 25 valley residents with mileage reimbursement support for 354 one-way trips and 42,711 miles of escort assisted transportation to distant medical services for a total service cost of $11,445. This breaks down to a one-way trip cost of $32.33 per trip and a .27 cents per mile subsidy. Due to a budget shortage in FY15/16, the Independent Living Partnership supplemented the TRIP funding for four participants for one month in order to keep the program running through the end of the fiscal year. In FY16/17, the budget for the TRIP program was increased accordingly to support the number of passengers. The fare for the Desert RoadTrip service is currently at $5 per one-way trip or $10 per round trip. The TRIP program is currently meeting the required farebox requirement, therefore, no need for increasing the fares in FY18/19. Staff will continue to analyze the program to insure that the farebox requirement is being met. Volunteer drivers will continue to be recruited in order to guarantee Desert RoadTRIP users have escort transportation. PVVTA is also a partner in the Volunteer Driver Corps program. Desert RoadTRIP is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2019 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 2020 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 2021 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 15 PVVTA X-Tend-A-Ride Community -Based Service Link PVVTA X-Tend-A-Ride is a demand responsive service to address special areas in time where community events require general public transit service that may not be available on the fixed route system. Events in the evening, on no service days, and beyond fixed route hours would be the primary focus of this service. X-Tend-A-Ride will provide curb - to -curb service with an exclusive fare targeted to meet farebox performance requirements. During a pre -planned community event, riders would be directed to fixed route service during regular operating hours. X-Tend-A-Ride would be available to provide service beyond regular operating hours. Similar trial service has been utilized for Sober Driver needs, added service to the local fair, and special community events needing public awareness. PVVTA X-Tend-A-Ride will not operate in place of fixed route services. RECOMMENDATIONS: 2019 Look at providing service for more community events and times where rides are needed. 2020 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 2021 No proposed changes this fiscal year; staff will continue to monitor service. 16 Performance Over the last few years, PVVTA has seen a cooling in increased ridership system -wide. Service performance is flat at best with increases seen in cost due to the State increase in minimum wage and fuel tax. PVVTA has seen a nominal growth in ridership from the Unincorporated Riverside County area of Ripley. This is specifically attributed to the relocation of Section 8 and assisted living families from western county. Over the holiday month of December, ridership systematically increases due to additional service placed on the fixed routes for holiday decoration viewing and services to community events over the season. Tethering services to community events along the routes has grown over the years and is now steady and predictable. Planning is made to limit services to the times and periods where transit can attract the most ridership. Red Route 3 has continued to show a decline in service due to the expanded vanpool options and reduction in staff at the Prison facilities. PVVTA continues to engage Prison staff to promote and market services to employees. Due to the continued concern PVVTA is eliminating another 2 trips on the Red Route in hopes to bring performance measure back in line with the other fixed route service. Planning Over the last year, PVVTA has been working with both city and county planning departments to include conditions for transit usage on all major projects in the area. With those conditions PVVTA is also carefully planning the implementation or addition of services in the affected project areas. PVVTA continues to see improvement on performance goals with the BWE. The Blythe Wellness Express (BWE) utilizes a shuttle bus to the Coachella Valley for medical trips, the TRIP program for medical trips further into Western Riverside County. Taking aspects of local medical needs, community partnerships and the overwhelming need to link Eastern Riverside County the BWE has shaped out to be a much needed program for residents of the Palo Verde Valley. Planning for the BWE includes expanding the scope of rides and marketing towards a larger population for civic and social service trips. With the local services, PVVTA has seen challenges with service to the CA State Prisons and the increase in vanpool options for riders. Ridership has greatly diminished due to the appeal of lower ride cost and selectivity on the vanpools. For the Green Route 4 service, local riders have asked for a midday return trip to Ripley. This would accommodate congregate lunch programs in Blythe where riders would have to wait over two hours for the current trip back home. Silver Route S varies in ridership throughout the different months. This is mainly do to the climate and times when shopping is needed. 17 Staff continues to factor in these specific operational characteristics when planning service. Along with local transit advisory meetings PWTA closely monitors service levels and changes throughout the year. Even with the reasonably flat ridership PWTA sees a potential for ridership growth with all services. Service Changes Route Changes and Modif cations PWTA Blue Route 1 - will continue to run the existing route with no changes in routing. PWTA Gold Route 2 - will discontinue Desert Preparatory Academy tripper. PWTA Red Route 3 - will cut another two (2) hours total from the daily schedule (one AM and one PM trip), an estimated decrease of seventy (70) miles daily. PWTA Green Route 4 - will add an additional one hour of daily operation for a return tripper at 4 pm. PWTA Silver Route 5 - will continue to run the existing route with no changes in routing. PWTA will continue the Blythe Wellness Express; one day a week to the Coachella Valley for non -emergency medical access. PWTA will continue to operate XTend-A-Ride service which is a demand responsive service that addresses special areas in time where community require general public transit service that may not be available on the fixed route system. PWTA will continue to offer the Desert RoadTRIP program as well as promote use of services such as the BWE and Xtend-A-Ride. 18 Community Engagement The following community engagement activities as well as marketing efforts will be utilized to promote ridership growth in FY 2018/19. 1. Continuation of the marketing program, which includes brochures, flyers, advertisements in local newspapers, community transit fairs, participation in community events, and promotional materials. 2. Continuation of public outreach program, which includes meetings with schools, employers, senior service programs, persons with disabilities programs, social service agencies, the general public, city departments, and other organizations that benefit from public transportation in the Palo Verde Valley. 3. Continuing the Mobility Training program to teach the public about mass transit including those with disabilities. 4. Continue to offer information on Rideshare programs available to residents and visitors of the Palo Verde Valley. S. Continue to foster new partnerships with Palo Verde College Association of Student Governments, and new businesses coming to the city through the Shop, Save and Get Home Free Program. 6. Continue to work with marketing consultants to improve the Blythe Wellness Express and the Agency website pvvta.com. 7. Continue to co-sponsor and stay involved in community events such as Run for the Wall, Summer Safety Event, Cleanup Day and local chamber events. 19 Financial & Capital Plans Operating Budget The proposed Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency's operating budget for fiscal year 2018/19 is $1,390,714 which includes $283,944 in operating expenses for the Blythe Wellness Express (BWE), a pilot program which started July 1, 2017. The Agency's regular operating budget for FY2018/19 is 15 percent over last year's operating budget. The increase is primarily due to an increase in operating and maintenance costs of the regular routes and operating costs for the BWE. In FY18-19 the BWE will be federally grant funded only through December 31st. The remaining six (6) months will be funded with available Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) grant funds and 5311 funds. The Agency's budget includes only those expenses for the day-to-day operations of the Transit Agency. Expenses are closely monitored to assure the Agency continues to operate within its budget and is compliant with the mandatory 10 percent farebox recovery ratio. Capital Budget The Agency's capital budget for FY 2018/19 is $321,510 which includes, LCTOP funding for the Operations Facility Enhancement Solar Project and Blythe Wellness Express route, STA funding for the purchase and replacement of a fixed route bus and bulk purchase of tires, filters, etc., 5310 funds for the purchase of a dedicated BWE service bus and State of Good Repair (SGR) funds for a facility shade structure. Regulatory and Compliance PWTA adheres to all regulatory and compliance requirements as mandated by the Riverside County Transportation Commission and/or other regulatory agencies, as it pertains to ADA, DBE, EEO, etc. A TDA Triennial Performance Audit was performed for the period of July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2015, in which there were four recommendations for improvements made by the auditor. Pursuant to the audit performed, the recommendations were: ✓ Continue to pursue a succession plan for the Finance Manager position. ✓ Continue to pursue a fare revenue sharing agreement with Palo Verde College. ✓ Include Desert RoadTRIP financial and operations data in the PWTA State Controllers Report. ✓ Provide Title VI Policy documentation in Spanish. PWTA has already addressed all four recommendations outlined in the Triennial Audit. 20 a s Q m LO o n �+ o 0 0 Vw.f co f6 9 Lry 00 S 00 m Ln m ID ` = pl Q y .--i (+9 � 0i Lr OO O 'tt %D M O — r-i A� J y y O : rl ,-4 O N 4 yo lC y Z W IL > v a yN Ol O CDtr ,--� � m Ln O r, .� CD UD r� %D Ln � O 0 w N O � m !0 i G 01 G=7 ^ L' Ln 1" i� W tD DJ � Ln V ri v n 0n M q- n Ln O O O 01 ' O V O to o N N N - I .-f H m 1\ O w = y N yNy +� d w V4 m n f 10 o +O+ v d u s o ff Jw- IL d Q IM V T4 N C ; u° 4 co a � � a a c a LL a a z z z z a a a LL H U C7 ❑ U U U U U U U' u C7 U O1 's c � J 'O CL E a w of Z. C fd 41 00 O CO 00 CO kD tD W 00 OD COfV .--I fV m m N fo V a u � u � F- 4 C L7 LL elf w w c d me a a U LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL m O m m LP %D m 0 N N n CD 0 0 O N NOrlj ON Q 4 N r4 m t ry m 7� � v ra %D IT N a m O 4 O m G o � Ln r, m N T r• VNI O C r?s M Ln +o 11'1 0 o a+ rn o Ln 1e rq rn n o n N bR Ln if7 N ,• r"l t~4 V ~ N a acme ;tru Z rn N M r4 co rp ppQ Q m C. ui C U n Lq h lD N i0 N Ln �o N7 m ors Ni t_lG yMp U r"� CD N N rl 4 Ln CD f os W O, Sri r*f' r` vt w 1 1 = SO Wt cc a O N n pr v M Q C N m m � Cl N G -I-7 p C O C O t\ p N o+ pl m N N .--i f! 'D N N r., en 9M0 co Pam'] ti M Lp o+ •p N LR .-I 8C4 ui O -W, C pp O N m N O LA Ln rl Ql M .�N-+ IiS M O A ftO+ 4 N Ln f n lA — n C, m ry o M 0 o; 0 m o f+ p co .� N cp y M M m Ln ui Cs M 1 !\ m Ln rq rq Ln V N tb c Lc Q 1 t! W 41% e�-r co t v N � � a N Ch f\ m O o CD a N C .; N ui M Q' M Ln b M o+ O N C1 �c�Do OWN+ M V1 Ln M 'T m �D f� rN '-1 4Pr Vt o1 +A {g 4 +R Y+ M N idt ili « .C•r � 9 N = �a a i c a w a C 3 N0 j ul 41 R j d v Ai to cu •yRi v = f _ v N rn n 7 N d O C S n c }i L H oC N GC Gl Gl 4 tY rp Cr G� Gl Gf c c s {:1 •L A LL G L rn c V V U 1p L L N G UJ N C C C j K d v 1� W rn E N R i N 9 m 7 av 7 U p w > > tY p fo f6 LL d rD C E� m :•7 N m d V U O u a f1 � w a� v R m :z C N 01 d W 7 Li � t rn Ix C. C. a C. al W e = a x •0 o ro a m a G ;, Y rn a a a E v ++ m t ,� o d d a) f0 a C 10 0 H Z d O LL rA tA rn U) a n ' ' 6 U. CL D d a 22 a CT Ln p Q1 of N p p p N p p V- m u7 tt p N rn rn M ID h u1 VJ M u] ul .-i ul .--i rV h V: %o to M O + a+ % h VI n 4/} +Pr n 4n .� oa Nd ID 10 P 0 C�m m m n V' Q; T N M �--I C� L N O -v V � T 16 N W R ti ipll M N N Ln m p .--I w m O N t� 4R 10 n a Na �E M �D fq un m o p C) p M a m p r. h Ln m Gi N N iD Qi h m O Vo C6p Sp M Vo Ln m M p C � h .�r N+ 44 O � MC� o 07+ ko m rn vs bn n c it A C N S u] O h M C�C� C ry p m V' T ko ul O m M N h V7 C.m m Ncr, M 11 M p m .-�I M h Ln M N LA N m'o M 0 u} �-+ m O uaf rN7 V m in i 4R 4R 4R ti co 10 � N Q h N V7 h Cp C) ) O +--I p N N +--� Q M h N m Ln rn h cl N N .h-r LO M CO 00 7 M Ln C. N M uh fV MI N m Vi m u1 :Yr CI LM T NC7 .--i m m V' 11 m � 44 rN-•1 40' 4A, N _ 9 FPr 4Pr 4Pr .-1 f7 N Ln y � L M o a_ y/ G1 C N j � dl d1 Vl u� LT n A o v 79 "CU 9 t 41 g R d N w�+ O' t _ R a N a R ma OM Y 7 ¢¢ 7 ¢p M x •G o � yyc Y y O O A C UI i ��+ a.� 47 14 6�1 y � ry O O O U. U. o a 7 N z O _ F4 > _ 7 7 c+ c, a a w p U G. 4 d Q Of a� d d C. a G! v N 3 N OLi yr in Ln inn a a 23 0 "1 bl 4 ��o a cc r, G N 4 Q n ~- 0 O n '. Q o �� Ni{} O N N N zr kD r1i n ne ��o r n m w C �� �� +n 4NR +q M m y a 00c ac S co O c0 , n M G o O N a M r-i ��--I n 'Ir Ln Ln M n Lq O r�� O N Q w �� O M ui Ln r, ri Ln  u��i Ay ifi} ift N N iR :A N N ������yyyLLLL aLnfnW ��������o Po ������ mm M M O n N G CD W .-i O N Ln I- Mkv 4A iA M =� '0 ro 0 N a n  m N �� ��a ��o a�� N 3 ��a L L W L C v-y o v i yy 7 = a y y .�� - VICL E CD r_ H u Lr f L6 a a` a m M 'ALL L3 CCJ {yr V s^ N a! 2 6 L m oL u u N L L L LT L tl55 m 7 > 7 6) Q O d K QOC1 14 11 O A v V C La a e`v iv is a`i a L R U y PC chi n n n N n `y N n e aL c r a o a a+ a a U ��, ;�� a Vic_' v y ID y 6i d 1p o a ai d = La o o a ' a a H H F O u ui Ln n 0. a it O a R 24 a 4 C to M CO •-� N p O C Ch o M LD m LO M p N ko Ln '-I G Q � �P •O O T 00 M Qi M •••I O N ID o, co LD p f7 N 00 Ln � H (if Ii a rl V, M UW M N N pCC C+ tR t4 !7 L � A Q¢}} F Q ' K yN C1 {� M ��,• w a, p LnnM'7 00 n OyC O O O N M a -� •--� n •-� 06 Ln M Lni0 h O n lfl f� o • V L? p M 00 w M IUl U) 'A N N ih M iff n a Na �L Q C Q N N M N In O p p .�-I N VO' nN'4 OMO n N •N+ n M Cl M p M O .i Ln LD rj O+ 00 0W0 iH N N N VF � %0 Vt t N kR Vi N b+ Ln W � - N_R N 6. qJ i ft%- o ,--i Ly1 f, 00 p p G Cy,o Ln .•1 M N O W 4 Ln N 0+ Cl N M Q fh 2 N ri Ln 0Z Ot W M p N N L 00 • * Lf1 M O p1 N n O Ln � � n mliv bt C7, Gh 1 h N - cr 0 b4 N .r Ct ID N iO IV N 4 y a �D U, Y1 y N D N N j d L LU � C j 1.1 ? (U a v la v�i QI tY F R > o v a B H d R N R 2 C C 7 ? 0 W LT 7 u -Ol u N W N 7 7 I N c N La Lr 14 L y N T d > > S > V w Li) 6 9 b y C La_ C 2 V U `v OL Q e •_ 7 N 01 a �o W 7 �o � 7 = OL a`qr LY a`i a`, a`, • z O x ip n O R a a C a im 'd a Y� a Yi a 16 = x d >. L7 >. LZ >, fl >, L0 , to 2 V •V OLz +, Y m a s n y c at a o o a 'c o 0 7 't n ro o h 5 y a L F F z L a H y O LL Ln Ln Ln Ln a a .n U. iL O d a 25 0 LY t1 e fa A M M .-i N C. O O 6a1 V�1 V m HY h C 1 N In IQ In M N M �. m M M 001 N N p NVi in O cam IM . LA � VNl ��� .fir 'A �« y L ON A • K C LU Qi C 4 r M N lD m %p O O O m u p N G+ M m OO 4t N [MOO O; N O .Vr � <? N 16 v Ol fN O, W M N ti +Pr to V1 N iR Co i _ wa-1 nVF kH M V14 Q 4 M iR ir, t_ 0 4 =V 0 N 1 9 U. 4 O O 1n o 1p M C Ln CO '° 1 N V c0 n w CO M O+ to tD l° M N lG M N m M V N Op N O N aWr Vf N i64 G _ iR Vi N n v vi � 00 "d N •--� 44. rl _N R� a G 4 m o n R !� N �D V 1�i] co n N S r� CO fO0 M O n .-i 'A W � O .r O M M 1n +" in 4} ih {H L4 H d b M � Q }N LL N ^ N W O O G p N N ry 4 M n CD 1N d+ 0° N 1n M V 00 I: M Ln O N C V M ry 64 O MN_ M co V M .�-i Ugh = •p FA ID 0 1A « •••1 9 }N c LL � i e C i Y m � L _w n UJ CJ N a S N •��+ n yap R QJ O C y q w g 0.v' m "J a a! 7 7 a -% H •� n LLJ LL a tJ L. IM w w w - s w w a>i 0 w ° 16 61 a1 Ip y 16 a=i a_Ni v u u C7 .� w > > °c c C > > > a7 0 o a a owC v a� 5 A U. p w 'm a>> n rn e = T 'ti O a a C '++ c a¢ a x >, >, >, >, 'a v� rn 2 U I D Y L p A U L v W +� c c c w v.. a F F Z y D a H F H a D m > > > > m m F 1L IL p, 0 d d 11 1n rn en to a s R 25 a 4 PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2018/19 - 2019/21 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Table 2A - Excluded Routes Service Type Date o Route # Mode (FR/DR) (DO/CO) Route Description Implementation Exemption End Date Provides peak hour express route service to and from the CA State Prison facilities. Red Route 3 FR CO 7/1/2026 6/30/2019 Provides systemwide deviated fixed route service within the City of Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde & requested trips to Ehrenberg, Arizona. Limited Saturday service Silver Route 5 FR CO only. 7/1/2016 6/30/2019 Provides transportation services to hospitals, medical offices, pharmacies, and medical equipment suppliers located in Riveride Blythe Wellness Express FR CO county 7/1/2017 6/30/2020 Note: Excluded routes are new routes or new service extensions that are eligible for exemption from the farebox recovery requirements. 27 fcm t- a� � � A , k! ( \ \ ( 2 � < w ¥ a # z \ A ! 2ap �. 7 [0 22 ch _ $ a � i _ . 1:5 Ili fT 2 Li M 7 a � $ � k - a i $ k _ $ k & [ E E § 2 § � ! ■ @ � ! � \ § & 7 S 3£§ E 2( f 2 § § - - - ��d ; lie � � ! 29 � �J TABLE 3-A INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS LINE ROUTE DESCRIPTION AREASISITES SERVICED FIXED ROUTE: Blue Route 1 Provides riders access to many civic locations within Destinations on Blue Route 1 include: City Hall, the City of Blythe. Blue Route 1 operates deviated Big K-Mart, Palo Verde Hospital, Employment service in a clockwise loop type of route providing Development Department, Palo Verde Unified a 60 minute frequency with one bus five days a week. School District, California Highway Patrol, DMV, Blue Route 1 operates from 6:25 am to 5:40 pm Albertsons, Rite -Aid, Senior Nutrition Program, Monday through Friday. etc. Gold Route 2 Provides riders access between the City of Blythe & Destinations on Gold Route 2 include: Blythe Palo Verde College. Gold Route 2 operates on a two City Hall, Big K-Mart, Albertsons, Colorado River way route providing a 60 minute frequency with one Fair, Blythe Recreation Center, Palo Verde bus, five days a week. Gold Route 2 operates from Hospital, Palo Verde Valley District Library, 6A5 am to 6:40 pm Monday through Friday Employment Development Department, etc. Red Route 3 Provides premium commuter service between This route serves four Park-N-Ride lots, travels City of Blythe and the California State Prisons. down Hobsonway to Mesa Drive. then travels Red Route 3 serves four Park-N-Ride lots, travels down to the State Prisons, via Interstate 10. Hobsonway to Mesa Drive then travels via 1-10 to the Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can prisons. This route operates Monday through Friday I be made at various locations within Blythe at from 5:15 am to 5:00 pm. two major transfer points. Green Route 4 Green Route 4 provides deviated fixed route service This route will service four Park-N-Ride lots, between Blythe, Ripley, Mesa Verde and Ehrenberg travels down Hobsonway to SR78 then South Arizona. This route operates three (3) round trips to Ripley and West to Mesa Verde via I-10. from 6:30 am to 6:55 pm, Monday through Friday. Connections to all other deviated fixed routes can be made at various locations within Blythe at two major transfer points. Silver Route 5 The Silver Route 5 provides system -wide This route will service the City of Blythe, Ripley, deviated fixed route service within the City of Blythe, Mesa Verde and selected trips to Ehrenberg, Ripley, Mesa Verde and selected trips to Ehrenberg, Arizona and will operate on Saturdays and on Arizona. This route serves all major trip generating service holidays only, areas within the system on 90-minute headways. Operates from 8:00 am to 12:10 pm. Blythe Wellness The Blythe Wellness Express fixed route will provide This route will provide services to Desert Center, Express service fixed-route/point deviation service between the for pick up and drop off of passengers, with a rest City of Blythe and medical facilities in the Coachella stop at Chiriaco Summit. Continue to Sunline Division Valley. This service includes one morning trip leaving 2, Indio, John F Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Indio, the Main Street Park -and -Ride in Blythe, with a return Westfield Palm Desert, Eisenhower Medical Center, trip in the afternoon. This fixed route service will run Rancho Mirage and Desert Regional Medical Center three days a week, leaving the Park-n-Ride on Main in Palm Springs. The service will run Monday, Street at 6:30 am and returning to Blythe at 4:00 pm. Wednesday & Friday from 6:30 am to 4:00 pm. Pala Verde Valley Tranglagency Short Range Transit Plan Fiscal Year 2018119 It A- - --IL! aq \k ` {� LL o \ \ \ ~ \� \ o )7® - - ® ® _ • ®---- - - 2 [ ka } a \{j 0 ` 2 - IL §/5 § ! k Im /\!ol - ©� 6 )«/� }a®;J . F £0o B = fk /\ E� / k f k \ ) k 7 = o � m �\ oA§G, 31 co FY 2018/19 SRTP Table 4A -- Capital Protect Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY19-1 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Replacement of one (1) Fixed Route Bus (CNG) PROJECT DESCRIPTION ffor bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase and replace one (1) CNG fixed route bus, with seating capacity of 16 passengers/2 wheelchairs. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency has several buses that have either met their useful life or are very close and need to be replaced in order to continue to provide reliable fixed route service to the community. Therefore, PVVTA is looking to purchase and replace one (1) CNG bus with seating capacity of 16 passengers/2 wheelchairs. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01 /2018 6/30/2019 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES RE UESTED : Fund T e Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2018/19 $120,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/19) 32 FY 2018/19 SRTP Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY19-2 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME-. Bulk Tires, Filters, etc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Far bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase in bulk transit bus tires, filters, coolants, etc. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Bus tires, filters, oil, coolants, etc. will be purchased in bulk for the year. This will allow quicker repair of the buses with the supplies already on hand. In addition, it will allow the buses to be put back in service much quicker. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2018 6/30/2019 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES UESTED Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2018/19 $15,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT # FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT # FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/19) 33 FY 2018/19 SRTP Table 4A — Capital Protect Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FYI 9-3 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: CNG Station Equipment Rehabilitation Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Rehabilitate major equipment at the CNG Station, PROJECT JUSTIFICATION An Ingersol Rand replacement block model must be replaced on the compressor at the CNG Station. This replacement includes, low oil level switch, single point drain, gauge panel, and crankcase heater. Also included in the cost besides the equipment is the expense for the installation of the equipment. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01 /2018 6/30/2019 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES UESTED : Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2018/19 $54,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT M FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/19) 34 FY 2018/19 SRTP Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No:_FY19-4FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Replacement of I Bus (CNG), dedicated to the Blythe Wellness Express (BWE) deviated fixed -route and X-Tend-A-Ride demand service. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase and replace one (1) CNG bus, with seating capacity of 16 passengers/2 wheelchairs, dedicated to the Blythe Wellness Express (BWE) deviated fixed -route and X-Tend-A-Ride demand response service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency requested and was awarded 5310 funds for the purchase and replacement of one (1) CNG bus. This bus will be used and dedicated to the BWE deviated fixed -route service and the X-Tend-A-Ride demand response service. Therefore, PVVTA will be looking to purchase and replace one CNG (1) bus with seating capacity of 16 passenger/2 wheelchairs for the dedicated service. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01 /2018 6/30/2019 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount 5310 Funds FY 2018/19 $97,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/19) 35 FY 2018/19 SRTP Table 4A — Capital Proiect Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY19-5 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Facility Shade Structure Project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase and installation of a facility shade structure for the shop maintenance building. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency is looking to purchase and have installed a shade structure for the shop maintenance facility. This structure will provide shade and protection from the hot sun for the maintenance mechanic while he works to repair transit buses. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01 /2018 6/30/2019 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED). Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount SCR FY 2018/19 $35,510 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT # FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT # FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/19) 9 k } � y- - ®- \/ r - - §;§§ , §�\2 {/\ j! - / 75 \{ § ) a / �/ 2 ` � k ƒ $ 2 )/ FD } k ) 37 FY 2019/20 SRTP Table 5.1 A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY20-1 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Replacement of one (1) Fixed Route Bus (CNG) PROJECT DESCRIPTION ffor bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase and replace one (1) CNG fixed route bus, with seating capacity of 16 passengers/2 wheelchairs. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency has several buses that have either met their useful life or are very close and need to be replaced in order to continue to provide reliable fixed route service to the community. Therefore, PVVTA is looking to purchase and replace one (1) CNG bus with seating capacity of 16 passengers/2 wheelchairs. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01 /2019 6/30/2020 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2019/20 $120,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/20) 38 FY 2019/20 SRTP Table 5.1 A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY20-2 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Bulk Tires, Filters, etc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase in bulk transit bus tires, filters, coolants, etc. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Bus tires, filters, oil, coolants, etc. will be purchased in bulk for the year. This will allow quicker repair of the buses with the supplies already on hand. In addition, it will allow the buses to be put back in service much quicker. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2019 6/30/2020 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2019/20 $20,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID ## AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT M FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/20) Wi § Ck 2 §K TA k3k� �§§uj / �LLk6g �0 uj k0 / kk ) ` d k � U. J 2 3 cr k 2 � E E � § / $ § $ LL k \ \ / } \ co ■-ƒIL CAI _M /\\ 64 J± /§ / LL 4. § § / ( k � \� �� ¢k } ( § § /) / \/ ) L) 0 ) __ oa 2cn ` ) » # a a ) e « \ ) I ES _ £ 2 \ k § r \ RE I§ - k \ } ) { o }\ {\ \ ) 4 /� ) a: a:} k) J, )o $AD | + \ ) k a )`!f; ) E LL z l y [k# 33 e u_ofu, 40 FY 2020/21 SRTP Table 5.2 A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY21-1 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Replacement of one (1) Fixed Route Bus (CNG) PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase and replace one (1) CNG fixed route bus, with seating capacity of 16 passengers/2 wheelchairs. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency has several buses that have either met their useful life or are very close and need to be replaced in order to continue to provide reliable fixed route service to the community. Therefore, PVVTA is looking to purchase and replace one (1) CNG bus with seating capacity of 16 passengers/2 wheelchairs. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2020 6/30/2021 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REOUESTEM Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2020/21 $130,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTUS SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/21) 41 FY 2020/21 SRTP Table 5.2 A — Capital Proiect Justif eation PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY21-2 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Support/Maintenance Vehicle Replacement PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase and replace the shop maintenance support vehicle. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency maintenance truck has exhausted its useful life and now needs to be replaced. PVVTA is looking to replace the maintenance truck so that the mechanic can respond quickly and reliably when a bus goes down on the road. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2020 6/30/2021 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES UESTED : Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2020/21 $35,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT # FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT # FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance as of 6/30/21) 42 FY 2020/21 SRTP Table 5.2 A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY21-3 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Bulk Tires, Filters, etc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase in bulk transit bus tires, filters, coolants, etc. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Bus tires, filters, oil, coolants, etc. will be purchased in bulk for the year. This will allow quicker repair of the buses with the supplies already on hand. In addition, it will allow the buses to be put back in service much quicker. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2020 6/30/2021 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REOUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2020/21 $20,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/21) 43 FY 2020/21 SRTP Table 5.2 A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, Indicate FTIP ID number): SRTP Project No: FY21-4 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: Bus Stop Amenities_ PROJECT DESCRIPTION (For bus purchase projects, indicate fuel type) Purchase bus benches and shelters to be placed at bus stop locations in the valley. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION This project has been an ongoing project but halted for a few years due to limited resources. PWTA would like to continue with the purchase of bus shelters, benches and where necessary construction of concrete pads for the shelters and benches. The summer weather in Blythe is extremely hot and bus shelters would benefit passengers waiting for the bus by giving them a place to wait, out of the direct hot sun. PROJECT SCHEDULE (If existing project in FTIP, indicate original start date and new completion date): Start Date Completion Date 7/01/2020 6/30/2021 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES UESTED : Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA FY 2020/21 $15,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE — INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT # FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT # FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Project # Description Unexpended Balance (as of 6/30/21) 44 TABLE 6—PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT Prior Audit Recommendation (Covering FY 2013 — FY 2015) Continue to pursue and implement a succession plan for the Finance Manager position. Continue to pursue a fare revenue sharing agreement with Palo Verde College. Include Desert RoadTRIP financial and operations data in the PVVTA State Controllers Report. Provide Title VI Policy documentation in Spanish. Action(s) Taken And Results Steps have been taken to document and archive key functions of the Finance position. The Board has taken action to allow transfer of such duties to become easier if necessary. PVVTA has multiple meetings yearly about service revenue and coordination. Palo Verde College has implemented services paying the full cost for transportation. This item is an ongoing discussion. The Desert RoadTRIP data has now been incorporated into the State Controllers Report. Effective with the FY2015/1 G report. Title VI Policy documentation was translated to Spanish and approved by the PVVTA Board on June 21, 2017. (1) If no action taken, provide schedule for implementation or explanation of why the recommendation is no longer relevant. 45 t I cc 6 QC fA A y� a c = Qj a a R d 1p c �} Q1 IC V Oi Q O F R A M 2 6l Gl dl ; tll Q1 W y � OA IL f f ro x ap o p y y p H H Q = N N N N N � �j N U- Q/ N u U-[L LT !L N JR r\ � I15 UN uui 00 N {TL ` Q co Q LA Ifi G iA- t" L V m 4Pr vi � 4 0 �yM OI fL } 7 C t� +! H 1 1 Ln a '+ N n 0tc O O] C0 G u1 M Oa n rn ,-i t0 %0 a .N-i ro d V V L M A II V V 'aV C C G a F C N ti N W Ln rl t0 ",i m Q ? 4 I! 11 iq A A W G 4A Il II II A V� A N A II A fN a ii U3 en o � ON1 m n� M N ra,�l � O000 s � cc l/1 � O � NY O C LO Ln m f\ n C N �" A .-r --� N N .--i .�-i+ a ti w +A a AFF ifh cc ri n O N E 9T Z i c a 4.1 a�p U = c aNi m o y E E _ m 2�' c' a a a� f m= a m c W N 4c1 W N C 01 rn } ? R W to n v ayi °i ah m `a d a m al a E 5 n c a�i a, v�i al 01 P i m al a a C o o a a r f A t Q u IL a aQ1 IOU j 7 a rn a rn a a a d �+ d � c M c 4. _ x la .5 �. �. �. �- U U E a [Y. l'nc d lO 5 A 7 3 in G] v O C v B C cC <n ,��+ t S Q G rn Y� ti a VNI ro v P a ADU] r+ + V� N 1A Uj b n a m f r y cy ¢ a a O a a O 9 lL i O un o v) in' a° li u iNl L i lull N [ 1 1 a Fes- F H H F Z S G i a +n 46 0 a a t b 'A O CL O R � � w — u c a c R A m L (gyp a 0 w rn v � a� a m $'i a d Q VI N T fA 4 LL L W (D ;O v� o a A w Q1 •� °' Am, rn Z m V y ' o N v m c C a II y II y O ,o o N Q M ,a T a N Ln G�0 Cn N o z O z o Z 0 Z 0 Z o Z p z o Z o Z Ff V p Z p Z N A R A II A II A II A II A II A N n NC] 00 m o a% C7 en p m Q N 7 N c] C• V 00 m u7 O rV OR%o •D +-! qr %R Ln t n n o m u] N O. '2 C] N m +n IQ' O ml n ul N fZ fiv 6 n � r-i ih m Wp it, N O 1" n n Ol •q 01 rn . v+ Ln +fr r�-i tR F ilo C N rl 116 a � to � e N C 0 C r M ,p C Cf Oo C] Ln 4 Lnm C? 0% n N N n O tG 1� •�a �D �D � Ian m Ln N QI cO M CO co iH � # � +e4 T'1 10 O1 m Ln ui ke fll M n C] 4A co d! In .�-i 6ri 4N°r +m+ b4 i m a Oft rl 7 O ra n n a a A R L u a C >n LL n 4 o0 T [] M 4 CO G CA 4 W R � In r1 Lni o n st W u � c m N � � Q'o 4''1 Y R 00 W N - N w �D N w n Ln uti r4 C Cl uj Vt a0 r4 40�- C1 W 7 - ui O c C N Q iR . C %ID i• „% w ar ar E � � V N 9 Q p } W EL + � aJ a L_ _N C 7 y G U Y = a 2 •Q al 7 a a w > a ai N _a Qj b I 'fi G f0 a > > d a v a K m a I a e 3 c i a 3 a g p G o w — " cg n} = w Co] c u U c '� a a a a:a a • Off. rn a a o a N a c c an a fir a a n CL a a m 9 7 } ' 7cn y a O A I I a a z O O1 O O H oaC H a O LLo m in In' 011 a a iv 47 a 4 TABLE 9 — HIGHLIGHTS OF SRTP PRESENTATION ■ Transit service continues to be provided by contract with Transportation Concepts and will continue through June 30, 2019, with an option to extend the agreement four (3) additional one-year periods. ■ For FY 2018/19 PVVTA will increase the fare for route services by 6% based on the general public base fare. Staff will continue to monitor fare performance for future recommendation. ■ PVVTA's CNG Station has been in operation for several years now and the demand for CNG fuel increased tremendously during the first year of operation but declined in the second year due to the drop in fuel prices. The demand. for CNG has not increased since the decline in the second year but continues to operate at a steady rate. PVVTA will continue to monitor the CNG Station for efficiency. ■ PVVTA Blue Route l will continue to run the existing route with only minor changes to routing. ■ PVVTA Gold Route 2 will continue to run the existing route with no changes in routing. PVVTA Red Route 3 will be decreased by eliminating two (2) hours from the daily schedule (one AM and one PM trip), with an estimated decrease of seventy (70) miles daily. ■ PVVTA Green Route 4 will be modified slightly by adding one hour of daily operation for a return tripper at 4:00 pm. ■ PVVTA Silver Route 5 will continue to run the existing route with no changes in routing. ■ PVVTA will continue to operate XTend-A-Ride service which is a demand responsive service that addresses special areas in time where community require general public transit service that may not be available on the fixed route system. ■ PVVTA will conclude the FTA Rides 2 Wellness demonstration service the Blythe Wellness Express; while planning to continue services beyond the demo period. = The Agency will continue to place passenger amenities (e.g. benches, shelters) at strategic locations that promote new ridership through target marketing and partnerships. ■ Agency management will continue to focus on system productivity, mindful of TDA and RCTC Performance Improvement Plan requirements relative to the Farebox Recovery Ratio. Operating and FY14-15 FY15-16 FY16-17 FY17-18 FY18-19 Financial Data Projected Planned System -wide 49,673 45,227 45,807 43,515 46,052 Ridership Cost Per Revenue $103. l 5 $114.51 $119.83 151.40 175.84 Hour Productivity Performance Summary: The proposed PVVTA FYI8/19 SRTP, meets one of one mandatory indicator and meets 4 of 7 discretionary indicators. 48 Table 9B - Fare Revenue Calculation (consistent with Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Revenue Sources included in Farebox Calculation Actual Amount from FY 2016/17 Audit FY 17/18 (Estimate) fY 18/19 (Plan 1. Passenger Fares 61,524 56,304 75,000 2, Interest 30 50 40 3_ General Fund Supplement _ 4. Measure A 5. Advertising Revenue 6. Gain on Sale of Capital Assets _ 7, CNG Revenue 12,491 15,659 17,900 8. Lease/ Other Revenue 9. Federal Excise Tax Refund 10. Investment Income 11. CalPers CER13T 12. Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes 8,969 12,564 32,885 13.OtherRevenues 51,690 6,525 14,100 TOTALREVENUE for Farebox Calculation (1-13) 134,704 91,102 139,925 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES for Farebox Calculation 993,789 1,077,478 1,390,714 FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 1A.sss- Q ecw_ 49 th FY 2018/19-FY 2020/21 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN CITY OF IZIVEIZSIDE City of Riverside Special Transportation Services TABLE OF CONTENTS I. System Overview 1 1.1 Service Area 1 1.2 Population Profile 2 1.3 Paratransit Services 2 1.4 Fare Structure 3 1.5 Revenue Fleet 3 1.6 Existing Facility 3 II. Existing Service and Route Performance 4 2.1 Dial -A -Ride Services -System Performance 4 2.2 Key Performance Indicators 5 2.3 Productivity Improvement Efforts 5 2.4 Major Trip Generators 6 III. Planned Service Changes and Implementation 7 3.1 Recent Service Changes 7 3.2 Recommended Modifications to Paratransit Services 8 3.3 Marketing Plans and Promotion 8 3.4 Budget Impact on Proposed Changes 9 IV. Financial and Capital Plans 9 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget 9 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Operating and Capital Program 10 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements 10 Tables Table 1— Fleet Inventory Table 2 — City of Riverside SUP Service Summary Table 3 — SUP Route Statistics Table 4 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2018/19 Table 4A — Capital Projects Justification Table 5.1— Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2019/20 Table SAA — Capital Justification of 5.1 Table 5.2 — Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2020/21 Table 5.2A — Capital Justification of 5.2 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 Table 6 — Progress to Implement TDA Triennial Performance Audit 22 Table 7 — Service Provider FY 2017/18 Performance Target Report 25 Table 8 — FY 2018/19 SRTP Performance Report 26 Table 9 — Highlights of 2018/19 — 2020/21 Short Range Transit Plan 27 Table 9A — Operating and Financial Data for Previous Four Years 28 Table 9B — Fare Revenue Calculation 29 1. SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.1 Service Area Special Transportation (ST) is a division within the Community Services branch of the City of Riverside's Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department that has been offering transportation services to seniors and disabled residents in the Riverside community since 1975. This paratransit transportation service is provided within the 81.54 square mile incorporated city limits of the City of Riverside, shown below in Figure 1. Figure 1 �7rr8avrxrnVu rowoq. +ikrex.nsµrKrcormrtnrnrr i t'".L"•' nwF Northside Hunter � — i a'�•.e" Ind ustHal---`rr1 "` sae ,ur cams Downtown 4 N University - -' Wood Streets Eastside Grand - r � 7Exi Airport Magnolia Vittona ,w} Center La Sierra Acres Ananxa o Canyon Cast Sycamore Ramona r dh Canyon SycamoreCanyon La Sierra Casa BlancaSHawarden Park Business Park i Hills v Hills n Canyon Springs Arlington ' Pnrsidentia l Grove r } Park La Sierra ANaaandro (J 1 Arlini��h'n lk Arlington Heights La Sierra — South + Orangecresty Rnxraar County 3irmmr3pJerr ud FrRumre alrch foMM ppyNr+�IIC�O"h' rnav r 1 1.2 Population Profile The American Community Survey (ACS) data is a source of demographic information which is part of the 2010 Decennial Census Program. The ACS is a nationwide survey designed to provide communities with reliable and timely demographic, social, economic and housing data every year. Because the ACS is conducted annually, it serves as an interim source of up-to-date demographic data through the decade, until the next Census is conducted. According to the US Census Bureau, as of 2016, the population of the City of Riverside is 324,727 residents. The senior population within the City of Riverside (those 60 years of age and over) accounts for approximately 16% of the population. Riverside is below the national average of seniors age 60 and over which is 21%, however, due to the Baby Boomer generation aging into their sixties, the senior population will continue to rise. Ridership has been trending upward for the past several years and continues to increase. 1.3 Paratransit Services Owned and operated by the City of Riverside, Special Transportation is an origin -to - destination rideshare transportation service. The service is limited to senior citizens (60 years of age and older) and persons with disabilities (disabilities require a physician documentation). Special Transportation operates 362 days per year, only suspending service on Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year's Day. Operating hours for ST are Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. and on weekends and holidays from 9:00 a.m. — 4:00 p.m. In order to reserve a ride, passengers must call ST's reservation telephone number, during the business hours of 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays. An answering machine is available before and after business hours for cancellations. 01 1.4 Fare Structure and New Fare Type The ST fare structure for a one-way trip is $3.00 per passenger for a General Fare and $2.00 per passenger for a Medical Fare. Clients may pay their fare in cash at boarding time or with pre -purchased tickets. General Fare and Medical Fare Ticket booklets can also be purchased in advance which contain 10 single trip tickets. Special Transit received approval to increase its fare increase from $2.00 per trip to $3.00 for General Fares. A new fare type, Medical Fares, was created for individuals using our service for "medical related trips" such as doctors appointments, physical therapy, pharmacy visits, etc. Medical Fares would remain at $2.00 per trip so that the general fare increase would not be a barrier to wellness for our customers on a fixed income. 1.5 Revenue Fleet Special Transportation has been operating with a fleet of 35 paratransit compressed natural gas (CNG), alternative fuel, Type III vehicles. 8 new replacement vehicles were purchased last year to replace 8 vehicles that have reached their useful life expectancy. Special Transportation also owns one paratransit van equipped to hold six passengers and one wheelchair and a hybrid Honda Civic that is used by administrative staff in supervising routes and responding to accidents. These vehicles are not assigned to routes but are used as backups for special services. 1.6 Existing Facility Special Transportation Offices are located at 8095 Lincoln Avenue within the City of Riverside Corporation Yard. Included in the facilities are an administration building consisting of administrative offices, a dispatch center, restrooms and a break room. Special 3 Transportation's facilities also include a parking lot for the transit buses with each space equipped with a CNG slow fill station, and a CNG Maintenance Bay for maintenance and repair of the fleet. The facility includes five maintenance bays, an administrative office, and multiple storage compartments for vehicle parts and equipment. The facility is outfitted with state of the art safety equipment and machinery to maintain the CNG fueled vehicles. 11. EXISTING SERVICES AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE 2.1 Dial -A -Ride Service -System Performance ST served approximately 161,552 passengers during the 2016/17 fiscal year. ST averages between 400-500 riders per day and had traveled 712,547 miles in FY2016/17. ST will embark in a rebranding campaign in the next fiscal year in the hopes of informing the residents of Riverside of the service and increasing the number of riders. We will continue to advertise in places such as Riverside's senior centers and through the City of Riverside's Activity Guide publication. We will also continue to market the programs at various Senior Fairs and events throughout the city. 2.2 Key Performance Indicators During fiscal year 2016/17, Special Transportation met its mandatory farebox recovery ratio target and met six of the seven discretionary performance indicators, as shown in Figure 2 below: Key Performance Indicators Targets Scorecard Mandatory: 1. Fare box Recovery Ratio >=10% 10.41% Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour <=$73.09 $73.69 2. Subsidy Per Passenger >=$15.85 and <=$21.45 $18.41 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile >=$2.14 and <=$2.90 $2.49 4. Subsidy Per Revenue Hour >=$54.94 and <=$74.32 $65.75 5. Subsidy Per Revenue Mile >=$4.01 and <=$5.43 $4.65 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour >=$2.98 and <=4.03 3.60 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile >=0.21 and <=0.29 .25 Figure 2: Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indictors 4 2.3 Productivity Improvement Efforts ST strives to operate an efficient service and continues to seek ways to decrease costs while maintaining high productivity. ST Staff has been working on examining different staffing scenario's to maximize route efficiency will meeting customer demands. The Operation Supervisor is constantly examining the route efficiencies of each driver and then meeting with them to provide constructive feedback to improve how each driver conducts his/her assigned reservations for that day. For FY 2018/19, ST will be increasing the number of full time drivers to help meet the current service demands as well as add a Lead Driver/Scheduler to the Operations staff. ST will also be recruiting for an additional Operations Supervisor to help oversee the 43 drivers employed. ST is currently working on procuring an electronic fare collection system that would allow customers to use a smartcard type media to electronically pay for trip fares when boarding. This system would allow ST to eventually go cashless and utilize current technology to provide our customers with scheduling and payment options. 5 2.4 Major Trip Generators and Projected Growth Over Next Several Years Several factors will lead to growth of ST operations over the next several years. The Baby Boomer generation, the largest generation in the last century, is aging and becoming eligible to use our services as senior citizens. This element alone makes growth virtually unavoidable. The seniors, age 60+ makes up approximately 16% of the total population of the City of Riverside. Currently, 84% of the residents of Riverside are 59 years old or younger as shown in Figure3, leading staff to anticipate a higher demand for Special Transportation services in the near future. Special Transportation falls under the auspices of the City of Riverside Parks, Recreation, and Community Service Department (PRCSD). PRCSD is also responsible for senior programs, three senior centers, as well as the Friendly Stars program for developmentally disabled adults. This relationship and the connection amongst department staff in these three areas make it possible to connect resources and advertise by word of mouth to their program participants. Figure3 US Census Bureau, ACS DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSING ESTIMATES 2016 6 Major trip generators for the ST operations includes the various workshops around Riverside ST transport clients to and from and the Friendly Stars program on Friday evenings. During the week, a few primary locations ST frequents daily are workshops for mentally and physically disabled passengers that teach them to live independently. These passengers look forward to attending their workshops (work/school) to attain a sense of independence. Special Transportation transports over 169 passengers per day to their workshops, along with weekly transportation to Friendly Stars, which include holiday and unique programming. 3.1 Recent Service Changes No service changes have been made this year. 3.1 Recommended Modifications to Paratransit Services No modification to the present routes are needed. 7 3.2 Marketing Plans and Promotion In FY 2018/19, we will continue our concerted effort to create a marketing plan for Special Transportation. Special Transportation has been working with the City of Riverside's Marketing team to help develop a brand identity for the City's paratransit service. This "Rebranding" effort will have a drastic new look to our fleet of Minibuses that will not only see a change in design but also colors used to identify our program. More importantly, this effort will also see a change in the name of our service that will better capture what we do for the senior and disabled residents of Riverside. ST will continue with its advertisements on the back of the minibuses to help promote the service. ST will prints out flyers and brochures to distribute to the City's Community Centers and Senior Centers and also includes ads in other city publications such as the Activity Guide and Senior Guide. The Activity Guide is published three times per year, is mailed to over 55,000 residents and is available online at the city's website. Special Transportation Staff will continue to be present at special events (wellness fairs, grand openings, concerts, etc.) to conduct outreach to the public and distribute promotional products. For 2018/19, ST will continue it outreach efforts by presenting at various city wide events such as Senior Day to help promote the services and answer any questions residents may have. We will also increase our presence at senior living facilities resident meetings within the city and the various ADA workshops that take place in Riverside. ST has also launched a new website for the Special Transportation Services Program which will give the residents of Riverside all of the information needed to sign up and use our services. M 3.3 Budget Impact on Proposed Changes The largest budget impact to the program continues to be the cost of sustaining operations to meet service demands and the services rendered to ST by the City. These services include administrative oversight, procurement, human resources, payroll, etc. Increase in the cost of benefits and the costs for preventative maintenance has contributed to higher expenditures. The operational expense of running the program has increased over the past 10 years. Additional buses and increases in maintenance costs have contributed to the increase in operational expense. Also the increase of minimum wages in California has and will have lasting effects on the programs budget. Although ST has been able to maintain its farebox recovery ratio above the minimum 10%, the growing operational expense has forced the program to increase the fare from its current rate of $2.00 per ride to $3.00 per ride for General Fares and $2.00 per ride for Medical Fares. This increase has allowed the program to maintain a greater than 10% fare box recovery ratio. IV. FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 4.1 Operating and Capital Budget Special Transportation relies on Local Transportation Funds (LTF) to support its operating budget including 20% of the preventative maintenance funds needed for the fleet. The remaining 80% comes from federal section 5307 funds. ST's overall operating budget for the 2018/19 fiscal year has decreased 8.7% in comparison to the 2017/18 fiscal year as shown in Figure A. 0 Fieure A Budget Item FY 2017/18 Plan FY 2018/19 Plan Variance Percentage Salaries & Benefits $3,110,142 $2,823,948 -9.2% Materials & Supplies $34,000 $34,000 0.0% Fuel $220,000 $210,000 -4.5% Maintenance $500,000 $400,000 -20.0% Contract Services $127,800 $190,000 48.7% Non -Personnel Costs $473,745 $117,652 -75.2% Total $4,465,687 $3,775,600 -15.5% For FY 2018/19, Special Transportation will be requesting Preventative Maintenance funds in to help maintain our fleet of 35 buses. ST is continuing to partially fund a contracted security guard for the FY 2018/19 in order to continue the security of the parking lot and CNG Vehicle Maintenance facilities. ST will continue to work on various projects from previous year's funds that have been approved but not completed in this fiscal year. 4.2 Funding Plans to Support Proposed Operating and Capital Program ST will continue to take advantage of available grant opportunities as they come available through the State of California in order to support its capital programs. 4.3 Regulatory and Compliance Requirements Special Transportation strives to remain compliant with all local, state and federal regulations. Staff stays abreast of legislative information and developments by attending workshops, trainings, and conferences which are frequently offered free of charge to transit operators. ST complies with FTA reporting requirements such as the submission of monthly and annual National Transit Database (NTD) reports. ST recently underwent an FTA Triennial Review on March 27 — 28, 2018. Preliminary and Final report has not been presented at this time. 10 There were no violations noted during the California Highway Patrol (CHP) Safety Compliance Terminal Inspection in the areas of maintenance, driver records or driver hours of services during this year's CHP inspection that was conducted on March 6 -7, 2018. ST received a "satisfactory" rating in all areas. 11 (w Table 1 - Fleet Inventory � FY 2018119 Short Range Transit Plan CNivdi f"l-oeprhyim{ammsim City of Riverside Demand Response / Directly Operated Average Lifetime # of Life to Date Miles Per Active Active # of Life to Date Vehicle Miles Vehicle As Of Lift and Fuel Vehicles Contingency Vehicle Miles through Year -To -Date Year Mfg. Model Seating Ramp Vehicle Type FY 2017/ Vehicles Prior Year End March (e.g., March) Built Code Code Capacity Equipped Length Code 18 FY 2017/18 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 2010 FRD BU 16 7 25 CN 0 7 1,758,832 1,263,871 2011 FRD BU 16 4 25 CN 3 1 696,745 744,374 248,124 2013 GLV BU 16 7 25 CN 7 0 706,695 821,882 117,411 2014 GLV BU 16 9 25 CN 9 0 695,351 860,024 95,558 2017 GLV BU 16 8 25 CN 8 0 158,731 19,841 Totals: 80 35 27 8 3,857,623 3,848,882 142,551 TransTrack Manager— Page 1 of I 5/18/2018 Mill (w IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Table 2 -- City of Riverside -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Audited Audited Plan 3rd Qtr Actual Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 27 27 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $3,323,668 $3,453,446 $4,530,687 $2,179,850 $4,261,858 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $376,960 $359,596 $567,000 $325,452 $504,990 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $2,946,708 $3,093,850 $3,963,687 $1,854,398 $3,756,868 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 167,439 161,552 189,000 114,720 180,000 Passenger Miles 1,239,049 1,195,485 1,304,979 596,544 810,000 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 47,951.0 45,462.0 52,000.0 33,310.0 48,150.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 661,302.0 640,085.0 775,080.0 455,471.0 755,200.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 741,113.0 712,547.0 825,500.0 518,005.0 845,200.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $69.31 $75.96 $87.13 $65.44 $88.51 Farebox Recovery Ratio 11.34% 10.41% 12.51% 14.93% 11.84% Subsidy per Passenger $17.60 $19.15 $20.97 $16.16 $20.87 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $2.38 $2.59 $3.04 $3.11 $4.64 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $61.45 $68.05 $76.22 $55.67 $78.02 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.46 $4.83 $5.11 $4.07 $4.97 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.7 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.25 0.24 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. Trans Track Manager"" Page 1 of I 5/18/2018 limid[ fom 1prwim{mvmsim Data Elements Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics City of Riverside -- 4 FY 2018/19 All Routes Peak Passenger Route # Day Type Vehicles Passengers Miles Revenue Hours Total Hours Revenue Miles Total Miles Operating Cost Passenger Revenue Net Subsidy RSS-DAR All Days 27 190,100 1,200,550 51,100.0 58,000.0 755,200.0 800,200.0 $4,261,858 $504,990 $3,756,868 Service Provider Totals 27 190,100 1,200,550 51,100.0 58,000.0 755,200.0 800,200.0 $4,261,858 $504,990 $3,756,868 Trans Track Manager'" Page 1 of 2 5/18/2018 IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Performance Indicators Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics City of Riverside -- 4 FY 2018/19 All Routes Operating Operating Farebox Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost Per Recovery Subsidy Per Passenger Revenue Revenue Passengers Passengers Route # Day Type Revenue Hour Revenue Mile Passenger Ratio Passenger Mile Hour Mile Per Hour Per Mile RSS-DAR All Days $83.40 $5.64 $22.42 11.84% $19.76 $3.13 $73.52 $4.97 3.7 0.25 Service Provider Totals $83.40 $5.64 $22.42 11.84% $19.76 $3.13 $73.52 $4.97 3.7 0.25 Trans Track Manager'" Page 2 of 2 5/18/2018 City of Riverside FY 2018/ 19 Short Range Transit Plan Table 4- Summary of Funds Requested for2018/19 Capital Project State of Number Total Amount Good Section 5307 - Rv- Project Description (1) of Funds LTF STA Repair Section 5339 San. Bndo Fare Box Other Local Transportation Funds Operating Assistance $3,861,858 $3,356,868 $504,990 Capitalized Preventative Maintenance $400,000 $80,000 $320,000 Subtotal: Operating $4,261,858 $3,436,868 $320,000 $504,990 Video Surveillance Replacement (17/18) $96,794 Subtotal Capital $0 $0 $0 $96,794 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital $4,261,858 $3,436,868 $0 $96,794 $0 $320,000 $504,990 $0 Table 4A- Capital Proiect Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existingprojectin FTIP, indicate FTIP ID Number): SRTP Project No: FY 19-01 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: State of Good Repair (2017118) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Riverside Special Transportation would like to use the funding to upgrade the camera systems in each of our 35 minibuses. The current DVR systems in our buses have been repurposed several times as new replacement buses have been order and put into service. The video surveillance system is become unreliable at times and is regularly being repaired or serviced. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Special Transportation relies on the video surveillance systems in each of the buses to investigate passenger complaints, incidents within the bus, vehicle accidents, etc. This project would replace all of the old videos systems with newer up to date systems with the capability to automatically download stored video content wirelessly onto a dedicated server for easier access and storage. This would eliminate the need to take a bus out of service or take a driver off route to pull the video for an investigation. A newer system would also improve the overall time it takes to investigate reported incidents. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date I Completion Date September 2018 1 June 2019 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount State of Good Repair FY 17-18 $96,794 Total $96,794 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT#, FTIP ID# AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Description Unexpended Project # Balance (as of 6/30/17) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A City of Riverside FY 2019/ 20 Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for2019/20 Capital Project Sta to of Number Total Amount Good Section 5307 - Rv- Project Description (1) of Funds LTF STA Repair Section 5339 San. Bndo Fare Box Other Local Transportation Funds Operating Assistance $4,203,477 $3,693,438 $510,039 Capitalized Preventative Maintenance $400,000 $80,000 $320,000 Subtotal: Operating $4,603,477 $3,773,438 $320,000 $510,039 CNG Minibus Replacement (1) FY20-01 $121,895 $24,379 $97,516 Subtotal Capital $121,895 $0 $24,379 $0 $97,516 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital $4,725,372 $3,773,438 $24,379 $0 $97,516 $320,000 $510,039 $0 Table 5.lA- Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID Number SRTP Project No: FY 20-01 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: CNG Minibus Replacement (1) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To replace 1 CNG Mini Buses that have accrued 150,000 miles or more. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Special Transportation replaces vehicles that have reached 5 Years or 150,000 miles, in accordance with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidelines. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date August 2019 May 2020 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA 19-20 $24,379 Sec 5339 19-20 $97,516 Total $121,895 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT#, FTIP ID# AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Description Unexpended Project # Balance (as of 6/30/19) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A City of Riverside FY 2018/ 19 Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for2020/21 Capital Project State of Number Total Amount Good Section 5307 - Riv- Project Description (1) of Funds LTF STA Repair Section 5339 San. Bndo Fare Box Other Local Transportation Funds Operating Assistance $4,245,511 $3,730,371 $515,140 Capitalized Preventative Maintenance $400,000 $80,000 $320,000 Subtotal: Operating $4,645,511 $3,810,371 $320,000 $515,140 CNG Minibus Replacement (1) FY21-01 $121,895 $24,379 $97,516 Subtota I Capita 1 $121,895 $0 $24,379 $0 $97,516 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital $4,767,406 $3,810,371 $24,379 $0 $97,516 $320,000 $515,140 $0 Table 5.2A- Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER (If existing project in FTIP, indicate FTIP ID Number SRTP Project No: FY 21-01 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME: CNG Minibus Replacement (1) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: To replace CNG Mini Buses that have accrued 150,000 miles or more. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: Special Transportation replaces vehicles that have reached 5 Years or 150,000 miles, in accordance with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidelines. PROJECT SCHEDULE: Start Date Completion Date August 2020 May 2021 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED): Fund Type Fiscal Year Amount STA 20-21 $24,379 Sec 5339 20-21 $97,516 Total $121,895 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT#, FTIP ID# AND RCTC'S SRTP CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC/SRTP Description Unexpended Project # Balance (as of 6/30/20) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A FY 18/19 - FY 2020121 TABLE 6- PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TDA TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT Recent Audit Recommendation (Covering FY 2013-2015) Action (s) Taken and Results to Date 1. Implement the planned fare increase. Special Transportation received approval and The fare structure remained unchanged during has implemented a rate increase effective the audit period with no adopted fare September 1, 2017. General transit fares are increases. The last fare increase was $3.00 and Medical fares are $2.00 per trip. implemented in April 2005. STS analyzed its fare structure in order to sustain its required farebox recovery ratio, and cover increased In Progress operating and sick leave costs. One consideration in the analysis is to raise the one- way fare to $3.00, which is comparable to RTA's Dial -A -Ride fare. Special Transportation has looked into and 2. Include additional locally generated the possibility of advertising on our buses. revenue in the farebox recovery. After consulting with other transit agencies STS's current farebox ratio is slightly above the and looking into what resources are needed TDA standard of 10 percent. The revenues in to start a program such as this it was the farebox ratio are composed primarily of determined that cost of administering and passenger fares. New state legislation (SB 508) maintaining this type of program far reinforces current RCTC practice of allowing exceeded the monetary benefit it would other locally generated revenues in the farebox ratio. These other revenues could include generate. We will continue to look for and advertising generated by the transit system, examine alternative revenues to enhance the bus wraps on the vehicles, and other local farebox revenues. contributions from the City to the transit In Progress program. The annual TDA fiscal audit should calculate the farebox ratio inclusive of these additional revenue. STS should work with the City finance department to ensure other local transit revenues are included in the farebox ratio in the TDA fiscal audit for STS. 3. Track ridership trends for those using mobility devices. Special Transportation implemented a Industry trends show that passengers using monthly report that tracks the number of mobility devices such as wheelchairs, mobility wheelchair passengers we transport for that aids, and other mobility devices are on the rise. given month. This data will be used to With growth in wheelchair -bound riders and provide a yearly analysis on the different those using mobility devices on transit, active types of riders for a given year to determine tracking of ridership trends for these types of trends and also help STS in future project passengers will help with dispatching and proposals. proper deployment of vehicles. On monthly and annual performance reports, STS should Completed add a column to include number of passengers using mobility devices. Daily trip sheets might also be able to identify wheelchair riders by vehicle by day so that trends can be developed on the impact of mobility devices on transit productivity. This information could be part of the statistics being developed by STS management. 4. Provide Title VI Policy documentation in Spanish and on the STS brochure. Pursuant to the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, the City of Riverside adopted a Title VI Program in July 2014. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that no person in the United States, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin be excluded from, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Program compliance includes a link on the STS web page that is directed to the Title VI policy on the General Services page along with a complaint form in English. A Spanish language form is still under development. Also, the auditor could not find Title VI information on the printed STS brochure. Special Transportation is currently revising its webpage and a link to Title VI information will be included on the new page in both English and Spanish. The Special Transit Brochures are also currently being revised and will also have Title VI information printed on the brochure as well as a web address where customers can find the Title VI information. In Progress limid[ ("1-o prwim{mvmsim Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2017/18 Short Range Transit Plan Review City of Riverside Data Elements FY 2017/18 Plan FY 2017118 Target FY 2017/18 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 189,000 Passenger Miles 1,304,979 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours 52,000.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 775,080.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 825,500.0 Total Operating Expenses $4,530,687 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $567,000 Net Operating Expenses $3,963,687 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio 12.51% >= 10.00% 1 14.93% 1 Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $87.13 <_ $72.95 $65.44 Meets Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $20.97 >_ $15.18 and <_ $20.54 $16.16 Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $3.04 >_ $2.05 and <_ $2.77 $3.11 Fails to Meet Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour $76.22 >_ $54.22 and <_ $73.36 $55.67 Meets Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile $5.11 >_ $3.83 and <_ $5.19 $4.07 Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 3.60 >= 3.06 and <= 4.14 3.40 Meets Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.24 >= 0.21 and <= 0.29 0.25 Meets Target Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators Productivity Performance Summary: Service Provider Comments: TransTrack Manager- Page 1 of I 5/18/2018 FY 2018/19 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report lliyi li (wiry l-ueprwim(anRsim Service Provider; City of Riverside All Routes Performance Indicators FY 2016/17 End of Year Actual FY 2017/18 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2018/19 Plan FY 2018/19 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 161,552 114,720 190,100 None Passenger Miles 1,195,485 596,544 1,200,550 None Revenue Hours 45,462.0 33,310.0 51,100.0 None Total Hours 60,836.0 45,160.0 58,000.0 None Revenue Miles 640,085.0 455,471.0 755,200.0 None Total Miles 712,547.0 518,005.0 800,200.0 None Operating Costs $3,453,446 $2,179,850 $4,261,858 None Passenger Revenue $359,596 $325,452 $504,990 None Operating Subsidy $3,093,850 $1,854,398 $3,756,868 None Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $75.96 $65.44 $83.40 <_ $66.81 Fails to Meet Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $5.40 $4.79 $5.64 None Operating Costs Per Passenger $21.38 $19.00 $22.42 None Farebox Recovery Ratio 10.41% 14.93% 11.84% >= 10.0% Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger $19.15 $16.16 $19.76 >_ $13.74 and <_ $18.58 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $2.59 $3.11 $3.13 >_ $2.64 and <_ $3.58 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $68.05 $55.67 $73.52 >_ $47.32 and <_ $64.02 Fails to Meet Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $4.83 $4.07 $4.97 >_ $3.46 and <_ $4.68 Fails to Meet Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour 3.60 3.40 3.70 >= 2.89 and <= 3.91 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.25 0.25 0.25 1 >= 0.21 and <= 0.29 Meets Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2018/19 Plan to the FY 2018/19 Primary Target. TransTrack Manager- Page 1 of 1 5/18/2018 Table 9 - HIGHLIGHTS OF 2018119 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • Comprehensive Transportation Study— In an effort to improve our continued service to the resident of the City of Riverside, ST will be conducting a comprehensive study to look at our operations, staffing, and overall program. This study will identify strengths and potential areas of improvement so that the program can continue to grow and serve the public. Capital Projects: • Replace the video surveillance system in each of the 35 minibuses for increased reliability and to allow for wireless access and downloading of the video footage. The funding for this project has been provided by the State of Good Repair Program. • Special Transportation will complete the projects started in 2017118 but were not able to complete prior to the end of the fiscal year. These projects include: • Electronic Fare Collection Module • Bus Procurement • Rebranding & Marketing Campaign Performance Target Report — ST plans to continue to meet the mandatory farebox recovery ratio target and has met the seven discretionary performance indicators in the FY 2017/18 (shown in Table 9 below.) Transit operators are required to meet at least four of the seven discretionary performance indicators. Table 9 Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour Meets Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile Meets Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour Meets Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour Meets Target 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile Meets Target Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indictors Operating and Financial Data for the past four years and for the 2018/19 Fiscal Year are shown below. Table 9A Operating & FY2014/15 FY2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Financial Data (Projected) (Planned) System Wide 175,276 188,480 161,552 162,400 180,000 Ridership Operating Cost per $67.57 $65.74 $72.74 $71.45 $88.51 Revenue Hours Farebox is the only source of revenue for Special Transportation. Figure 9B below reflects the farebox revue and the operating costs since FY 2014/15. Table 9B Fare Revenue Calculation (consistent with Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Revenue Sources FY2014/15 FY2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 (Estimate) (Plan) Passenger Fares $384,631 $376,960 $359,596 $ 433,990 $ 438,330 Total Revenue $384,631 $376,960 $359,596 $433,990 $438,330 Total Operating $3,749,768 $3,323,668 $3,453,446 $3,311,940 $4,161,858 Expenses Farebox Recovery 10.26% 11.34% 10.41% 13.10% 10.53% Ratio ' w AVIV^ 1 �i n• a + -R Riverside Transit Agency SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY19-FY21 Mow- lb"ON' �i Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 Riverside Tra nail Agency Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1: SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1 8 1.1 JURISDICTION 8 1.2 POPULATION PROFILE AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS 9 Population Profile — Rider Characteristics 9 Demographic Projections 10 1.3 FIXED -ROUTE AND PARATRANSIT SERVICES 11 Fixed -route Services 12 Paratransit Services 13 1.4 CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE 13 Cooperative Fare and Subsidy Programs 14 1.5 REVENUE FLEET 15 1.6 EXISTING AND PLANNED FACILITIES 16 Existing Facilities 16 Planned Facilities 16 1.7 EXISTING COORDINATION BETWEEN TRANSIT AGENCIES 17 Regional Coordination 17 Interregional Coordination and Transfer Agreements 18 CHAPTER 2: ROUTE PERFORMANCE AND EXISTING SERVICE 19 2.1 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 19 Service Standards and Warrants 19 Productivity vs. Coverage Target 20 Warrants for New Service 21 Annual State of Public Transit Report 21 2.2 EXISTING FIXED -ROUTE ANDDiAL-A-RIDE SERVICE 21 2.3 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS 21 2.4 POTENTIAL GROWTH MARKETS 22 2.5 PASSENGER TRANSIT FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT AND PASSENGER AMENITIES 23 Existing Passenger Transit Facilities 23 Planned Passenger Transit Facilities 25 Equipment and Passenger Amenities 30 CHAPTER 3: RECENT AND PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES 32 3.1 RECENT SERVICE CHANGES 32 3.2 PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES 32 3.3 MODIFICATIONS TO PARATRANSIT SERVICE 35 3.4 MARKETING PLANS AND PROMOTION 35 3.5 BUDGET IMPACT ON PROPOSED CHANGES 37 CHAPTER 4: FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS 39 4.1 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET 39 4.2 FUNDING SOURCES FOR OPERATING AND CAPITAL PROGRAMS 42 4.3 TUMF PROGRAM 43 4.4 REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS 44 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 =R-r Ri—side T—ij AgpR� Tables Comparative Statistics Table 1 Fleet Inventory 1) Motor Bus/ Directly Operated 2) Motor Bus/ Purchased Transportation 3) Commuter Bus/ Directly Operated 4) Demand Response / Purchased Transportation Table 2 SRTP Service Summary 1) Routes: All Routes (System -wide Totals) 2) Routes: Non -Excluded Routes 3) Routes: Excluded Routes 4) Program: Directly Operated Fixed -Routes 5) Program: Contracted Operated Fixed -Routes 5) Program: Dial -A -Ride 7) Program: Taxi Table 2A Excluded Routes Table 3 SRTP Route Statistics Table 3A FY18/19 Individual Route Descriptions Table 4 Summary of Funds Requested for FY18/19 Table 4A Capital Project Justification for FY18/19 Table 5.1 Summary of Funds Requested for FY19/20 Table 5.1A Capital Project Justification for FY19/20 Table 5.2 Summary of Funds Requested for FY20/21 Table 5.2A Capital Project Justification for FY20/21 Table 6 FY16 FTA Triennial Review — Summary of Findings Table 7 Service Provider Performance Targets Report Table 8 FY18/19 SRTP Performance Report Table 9A Highlights of SRTP / Operating and Financial Data Table 9B Farebox Recovery Ratio Table 10 RTA FY19 — FY23 TUMF Transportation Improvement Program Appendix A RTA System Map and Fixed -Route Maps Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 Ri a ,Ide Tra H Agency Glossary of Acronyms 5304 Discretionary grants for statewide and non -metropolitan transportation planning 5307 Formula grants for urbanized areas 5309 Discretionary grants for fixed guideway capital investments 5310 Discretionary grants for enhanced mobility of seniors and individuals with disabilities 5311 Formula grants for rural areas 5316 Job Access and Reverse Commute Program 5317 New Freedom Program 5337 State of Good Repair 5339 Formula grants for bus and bus facilities ADA Americans with Disabilities Act A&E Architectural and Engineering AHSC Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program ATIS Advanced Traveler Information System BRT Bus Rapid Transit CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program CNG Compressed Natural Gas COA Comprehensive Operational Analysis CPUC California Public Utilities Code CTAF-CTSGP California Transit Assistance Fund — California Transit Security Grant Program CTSA Consolidated Transportation Services Agency DAR Dial -A -Ride paratransit services DBE Disadvantaged Business Enterprise EEO Equal Employment Opportunity EV Electric Vehicle FTA Federal Transit Administration FTIP Federal Transportation Improvement Program FY Fiscal Year GASB Government Accounting Standards Board GGRF Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Go -Pass Community College Pass HSR California High -Speed Rail ITS Intelligent Transportation System JARC Job Access and Reverse Commute Program, also known as FTA § 5316 LCFS Low -Carbon Fuel Standard LCTOP Low Carbon Transit Operations Program LEP Limited English Proficiency LTF Local Transportation Fund MJPA March Joint Powers Authority MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization MSJC Mount San Jacinto College NF New Freedom Program, also known as FTA § 5317 OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority OPEB Other Post -Employment Benefits OPEB-ARC Other Post -Employment Benefits —Annual Required Contribution PEPRA Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2012 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 Riverside Tra H Agency PTMISEA Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account PVL Perris Valley Line RCC Riverside City College RCTC Riverside County Transportation Commission RINs Renewable Identification Numbers RTA Riverside Transit Agency RTPA Regional Transportation Planning Agency § Section SB1 Senate Bill 1 SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SGR State of Good Repair SR State Route SRTP Short Range Transit Plan STA State Transit Assistance TCM Transportation Control Measure TDA Transportation Development Act TIRCP Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program TMC Travel Management Company TNC Transportation Network Company T-NOW Transportation NOW TSP Transit Signal Priority TTS Timed Transfer System TUMF Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee UCR University of California, Riverside U-Pass University Pass U.S.C. United States Code UZA Urbanized Area as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau WRCOG Western Riverside Council of Governments A Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 1gr Ri—side T—ij AgpR� EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP), updated annually, covers FY19 — FY21. The plan provides a description of Riverside Transit Agency's (RTA) services, regional transit needs, and a look ahead at RTA's proposed service plans and capital projects. The plan will ultimately require approval by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) as mandated by California Public Utilities Code (CPUC) § 130303. Approval by RCTC allows the plan's operating and capital projects to be programmed in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). Approval also supports RTA's claim for Local Transportation Funds (LTF), State Transit Assistance funds (STA), County Measure A funds, and the submittal of grant applications to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) including but not limited to 49 U.S.C. § 5304, 5307, 5310, 5311, 5339, and the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ). Similarly, RCTC administers Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds and with the approval of the SRTP, will issue allocation and disbursement instructions for LTF and STA funds to the county auditor and controller. RCTC also administers County Measure A funds and will process payments to RTA consistent with the SRTP. Furthermore, the SRTP also lists projects eligible for Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) funds administered by the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). The approval of the SRTP also approves RTA's TUMF Project Expenditure Plan for FY19 — FY23. The State of California also offers several funding programs which focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. These cap -and -trade programs are funded by annual auction proceeds from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF). The Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) is administered by Caltrans and funds capital and operating expenses. In FY18, RTA was awarded LCTOP funds to provide increased frequency to one of the agency's key corridors, Route 19, which links Perris to Moreno Valley. For FY19, RTA applied for funds for two projects, one to increase the frequency of Route 28 (formerly a portion of Route 27) daytime weekdays to 30 minutes between Perris and Hemet and the other to fund free rides on the RapidLink Gold Line from July 1 through September 3, 2018. Other applicable cap -and -trade programs offered by the State of California are the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) and the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program (AHSC). Lastly, the SRTP allows RTA to develop business strategies and funding mechanisms to bring to fruition planned services, programs, and capital improvement projects that fall beyond the lifespan of the SRTP. These projects are included in RTA's Ten -Year Transit Network Plan, which is designed to meet the future transit needs of western Riverside County. 1 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 =K-T Ri—side Tra H AgpR� Continuous Improvement in Service: Over the past 40 plus years, RTA and the region's transit network have evolved from a suburban transit system to a complex multimodal network of high -demand timed connections between buses, trains, paratransit services, and non -motorized modes of transit. RTA is challenged with maintaining on -time performance as running times grow larger and less predictable due to increased traffic congestion, major road construction projects, and population growth. With expanding services to emerging new communities and neighborhoods, being proactive and adaptable to change will ensure RTA's ability to meet future mobility needs. In an effort to plan for those future mobility needs, RTA conducted a Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) study that concluded in early 2015. The study reviewed RTA's entire transit network structure and performance to provide a comprehensive understanding of market conditions and service expectations. The findings led to the development of a phased set of service recommendations designed to build on market opportunities, performance strengths, and ridership growth while aiming to improve both overall passenger experience and financial sustainability. The recommendations were based on analysis of existing and future market conditions, service performance, and feedback from RTA Board members, passengers, and key stakeholders. The end product of the COA, the Ten -Year Transit Network Plan, was approved by the Board of Directors in January 2015 and remains a guide for preparing the SRTP. The primary recommendations of the Ten -Year Transit Network Plan are to streamline routes, improve frequencies, enhance connections, improve bus stop amenities, and adhere to bus stop spacing and service design standards to enhance RTA's future services. Furthermore, the Ten -Year Transit Network Plan recommends enhanced service on popular routes to increase ridership and generate increased fare revenue. The plan also recommends maintaining appropriate transit service in lower potential ridership areas. The recommendations are designed to create a transit system that remains attractive to existing and potential new riders, while maintaining the delicate balance between efficiency, effectiveness, and fiscal restraints. Within this framework, the SRTP lays out a program of projects to accomplish the goals established in the Ten -Year Transit Network Plan. As outlined in the FY18 SRTP, RTA implemented several key service improvements to reduce overall travel time and attract new passengers: • In August 2017: o Implemented new RapiclLink Gold Line (Route 101) service during peak periods weekdays linking Corona, downtown Riverside and University of California, Riverside (UCR). • In January 2018: o Improved Route 19 frequency between Perris and Moreno Valley to every 15 minutes (up from every 30 minutes) daytime weekdays. 2 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 =K-T Ri—side Tra H AgpR� o Improved weekdays and weekend frequencies on routes 29 and 49 linking Eastvale, Jurupa Valley, and Riverside. Also service was extended to Amazon Eastvale (routes 3 and 29). o Implemented new CommuterLink Route 200 linking San Bernardino, Riverside, Village at Orange, and the Disneyland Resort in Anaheim seven days a week utilizing the new State Route (SR)-91 intercounty express lanes (expanded from former Route 216). o Implemented new CommuterLink Route 205 peak periods weekdays linking Temecula, Lake Elsinore, Corona, and Village at Orange utilizing the new SR-91 intercounty express lanes. Ridership Trend: Transit ridership is cyclical in nature and is substantially impacted by the economy, gas prices, automobile ownership, low interest rates on auto loans, and population and demographic changes. Therefore, understanding why recent declines in ridership are occurring and what actions the transit industry should take to combat them is a complex problem worthy of further investigation. In addition to the ongoing analysis of ridership trends by staff, RTA launched its Market Assessment and Strategic Direction Study in April 2018. Additionally, staff is participating in Transportation Research Board's Analysis of Recent National Public Transit Ridership Trends, which is scheduled to begin in July 2018. As shown in the graph below, in FY11 through FY14, RTA fixed -route ridership grew from three percent to seven percent annually while neighboring transit agencies lost ridership or showed a lower rate of growth. After this initial growth and consistent with the regional and national ridership trends, RTA has experienced three straight years of ridership decline on its fixed -route services. As of April 30, 2018, the year to date decline in FY18 ridership is two percent. Fixed -route Ridershio Trends since 2009 — Year over Year 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% -5.00% 10 _ 2011_ 2012 -10.00% -15.00% I2013 20 ■ Riverside Transit Agency Foothill Transit ■ North County Transit District ■ Omnitrans Orange County Transportation Authority SunLine Transit Agency 3 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 �' `p= H ipnry The American Public Transportation Association (APTA) November 2017 publication "Understanding Recent Ridership Changes: Trends and Adaptations" states that while current determinants of ridership decline can vary by community, there are four common themes: erosion of time competitiveness, reduced customer affinity and loyalty, erosion of cost competitiveness, and external factors such as parking supply, safety, and decentralized development. A separate study on transit ridership decline commissioned by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) focused solely on Southern California, concluded that the rise in automobile access and ownership (including access for undocumented people to obtain a driver's license and lower automobile and gasoline prices), particularly among traditional transit users, has played the most significant role in transit ridership decline. What APTA, SCAG, and other recent studies tell the transit industry is that the factors affecting ridership are myriad and complex, and that the solutions to addressing these factors and increasing ridership moving forward will be equally challenging. The Agency, in partnership with the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Department of Urban Planning, is also studying the impact of Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) and what role these providers may play in partnership with transit agencies. There is a range of public -private pilot partnerships between transit agencies and TNCs nationwide, which RTA is monitoring. These partnerships may be more cost effective, which would also create more competitive transportation options that were not possible under the traditional fixed -route and demand response transit service modes. In summary, RTA does understand that its transit services are one alternative in the market place for people's local and regional travel needs. RTA must ensure it remains competitive by improving frequency and adding amenities. These were the key factors desired by RTA riders and potential riders, as strongly identified in the rider survey conducted as part of RTA's COA study. The COA includes continued focus on improving service frequency and travel times on key transit corridors, making additional transit amenity improvements at bus stops and key transit centers, as well as managing safety and security issues. The goal is to influence new passengers to ride and encourage existing riders to ride more frequently. Future Service Plan — FY19 and Beyond: Moving forward, service plans for the next three years and beyond will continue to be shaped by the 10-Year Transit Network Plan's proposed strategies and recommendations. For planning and programming purposes, the SRTP covers a rolling three-year span with a focus on FY19. The table and text below summarizes fixed -route service level changes suggested for FY19: 4 . -> . Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21—R+-ide Tra nail Agency In FY19, RTA will enjoy a full year of ridership from improvements implemented in FY18 initiatives such as new RapidLink Gold Line, improved frequency on routes 19, 29, and 49, extension of service to Amazon Eastvale, and new Commuterl-ink routes 200 and 205. New service initiatives funded in FY19 are designed to help increase ridership, reliability, and financial sustainability: o Route 22 will be split into two separate routes to improve reliability and connectivity at Perris: ■ Route 22 (Perris — Riverside Downtown). ■ New Route 9 (Lake Elsinore — Perris). o Route 24 weekdays service frequency will be improved from every 80 to 60 minutes and the Temecula Library deviation will be discontinued due to low ridership. o Route 27 will be split into two separate routes to improve reliability and connectivity at Perris: ■ Route 27 (Perris — Galleria at Tyler mall in Riverside) — improved frequency from 60 minutes to 40 minutes. ■ Route 28 (Hemet — Perris) — improved frequency from 60 minutes to 30 minutes. ■ Route 61 - extend from Sun City (Menifee) to Perris in place of existing Route 27 ■ Route 212 would be discontinued to avoid unnecessary duplication of service with new Route 28. o Route 31 from Moreno Valley to Beaumont and Hemet will have its last weekdays evening departure approximately an hour later. o Route 33 will have service weekdays expanded to serve Tahquitz High School in Hemet. o Route 40 will be streamlined and expanded to serve more of the City of Menifee, including Mount San Jacinto College (MSJC) Menifee Campus, the Heritage Lakes area, and McCall Blvd east of the 1-215 freeway. o Route 200 will have additional trips added at peak times weekdays in response to high ridership on selected existing trips. o Routes 205/206: RTA will work to add a stop in the Indian Truck Trail / 1-15 Freeway area of Temescal Valley. o RapidLink Gold Line will have its hours of service rearranged based on ridership demand. o A comprehensive revision of weekend service in the south and eastern areas of RTA's service area will for the first time provide seven day service on all RTA local routes (excluding special weekday shuttle routes 26, 50, 51, 52, 54, and 55). Historically, it takes about two years to grow ridership on newly added service. With these service improvements, RTA aims to turn around the ridership decline experienced in FY16 through FY18. Taking a very conservative approach, the budgeted FY19 ridership projection and 5 -T Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 �' `p=-;, ipnry the resulting passenger fare revenue estimate assume the agency will match budgeted FY18 ridership and passenger fare revenue estimates, while it is expected actual FY19 ridership could exceed actual FY18 ridership, turning around the downward trend of the last three years. Capital Improvement Program: The development of transit infrastructure (bus stops, mobility hubs, and operations and maintenance facilities) is essential to the safe, comfortable, and efficient operation of transit services. During FY18, the Agency completed new bus stops for the RapidLink Gold Line in time for commencement of this service in August 2017, as well as upgrades to 38 bus stops throughout the RTA service area with upgraded accessibility, enhanced safety, and new amenities such as shelters, benches, and trash receptacles. The Agency also coordinated with the City of Eastvale to complete a transit hub at Amazon Eastvale that commenced operation for RTA routes 3 and 29 in January 2018. FY19 will also see some significant progress in the development of new mobility hubs. To prepare for future expansion plans and accommodate recent growth, RTA is working with a variety of entities to develop new multi -modal mobility hubs. These hubs will be innovative, use emerging technologies and may involve multi -use facilities. The projects that will be moving forward in FY19 are: • Promenade Mall Mobility Hub: In partnership with the City of Temecula and the Promenade Mall, staff completed Architectural and Engineering (A&E) work. Construction is slated to start in May / June 2018 and will be completed in time for reopening in January 2019 (substantial construction will be completed by the end of October 2018 ahead of the peak holiday shopping season). • UCR Mobility Hub: In partnership with UC Riverside, RTA will construct a mobility hub on campus. Conceptual design was completed in early 2018 and A&E work is underway. Upon completion of environmental clearance and documentation, a project construction schedule will be established. • Hemet Mobility Hub: In partnership with the City of Hemet, staff completed a conceptual plan and it was adopted in concept by the Hemet City Council in September 2017. A&E work will commence upon Hemet City Council and RTA Board of Directors approval of the conceptual plan and the project development agreement between the city and RTA. It is expected that the project development agreement will be presented to the Hemet City Council in May and the RTA Board of Directors in June 2018. • Vine Street Mobility Hub: Staff is expected to commence development of a conceptual plan for a mobility hub at Vine Street in Downtown Riverside, located on land across the street from the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station. A bid for conceptual planning is expected to be released once the property ownership transfer from the city to RTA is completed. With the adoption of the Bus Stops Strategic Policy in June 2015, RTA launched the annual bus stop improvement program. Based on the implementation plan commenced in FY18, 25 bus N -r Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 �' `p=-;, ipnry stops will be improved each calendar year throughout the service area with upgraded accessibility, enhanced safety, and amenities such as shelters, benches, and trash receptacles. The Agency's administrative offices, operations and maintenance facilities have reached their maximum capacity. With this critical infrastructure at capacity, RTA is proactively taking steps to stretch the useful life of existing infrastructure and concurrently developing sufficient financial resources to initiate the preparation of a strategic plan, sketch plan, and land acquisition plan to construct future support infrastructure. To date, the Agency has secured $17,267,086 in grant funds to initiate the preparation of the facilities masterplan, implementation plan, and land acquisition plan. Since projects of this magnitude are delivered over multiple years, it is essential to have a long- range strategic plan and a service plan to identify infrastructure needs. Up-to-date infrastructure is essential to support future mobility needs of this region and embrace rapidly evolving mobility strategies and technologies. The Agency must upgrade its support infrastructure, which includes: maintenance and operating facilities, fueling infrastructure, and administrative facilities to meet the future mobility demands of our region. Without these improvements, the Agency will not be able to cost-effectively expand service. Hence, the objective is to develop a strategic facilities masterplan and an implementation plan to meet the Agency's near and long-term responsibilities. Development of this plan is scheduled to commence in September 2018. Short Range Transit Plan e FY19 — FY21 CHAPTER 1: SYSTEM OVERVIEW 1.1 JURISDICTION RTA's jurisdiction is among the largest in the nation for a transit system, encompassing approximately 2,500 square miles of western Riverside County. Included in the boundaries are eighteen (18) incorporated cities including Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Corona, Eastvale, Hemet, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Norco, Perris, Riverside, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar, as well as the unincorporated areas of Riverside County supervisorial districts 1, 2, 3, and 5. Unlike other agencies of similar size, RTA is unique in that it provides service in both urban and rural areas. Urbanized and rural areas are defined by the United States Census Bureau (US Census) based on population size and revised every 10 years with each new Census. The urbanized zone areas (UZA) in the jurisdiction are Riverside -San Bernardino, Hemet, and Murrieta-Temecula-Menifee. Portions of RTA routes also connect to Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim, and San Diego UZAs, providing interregional mobility options for RTA customers. Based on data from the 2010 US Census, over 90 percent of RTA's services are located in UZAs. The map below illustrates RTA's jurisdictional boundaries and highlights the portions of the region considered urbanized. I a o Ontario Iles Pomona Iltut o W Grand Tefw,, d _ load Bar Chino —GlenAvur Rubidoux Chino Hills 83 Eastvale JuruPa Riverside Valley Los Serwfl_'f Norco Moreno Valley a Linea - _ Corona Herne Gardens Woodcrest lacentia 91 Lake pe El Cerrito ,'rlu thews 'IL, Park Q North Tustin a Tustin 518 26! 33 -vine ,uatrtill Ranch Rancho Santa Lake Forest Margarita Mission Viejo Layuna Hills 2dr Laguna Niguel Laguna Beach San Juan Capistrano Dana Point San Clemente Cah•r es.' Chefry Valley Morongo I.R. 60 1 Beaumont .._Banning Ca6azon iia 1-eke Penis stare Recreation Area Lakeview Nuevo Perris San Jacinto SoGoba I.R. Homeland Hernet Valle Vista $armago " Peak —- � Sun City Winchester East Hemet L ­vrond Canyon Lake Volley Lake Elsinore y (1-1-.Iwt d N al Forest s y�. LYildornat . 3 S v Murrieta 0 7< V Temecula f a <<baitga 371 Idyll 11 K Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 =R-r Ri—side T—ij AgpR� 1.2 POPULATION PROFILE AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTIONS RTA is challenged by the changing demographics in various communities and continues to be proactive by planning routes that are customer -oriented and financially sustainable. By studying the characteristics of riders, a better understanding is gained to more appropriately plan for and meet the needs of the transit market. Rider characteristics, along with demographic and population changes, are used to shape and strategize how resources will be allocated in future years. Population Profile — Rider Characteristics Bus passenger characteristics were collected from on -board surveys conducted in spring 2013 as part of the COA study. A demographic summary of weekdays, RTA riders offered the following characteristics: SUMMARY OF Average Age (Years) 33 Employed Yes 70% Average Travel Time (Minutes) 52 Bus Fare Categories How Long Using RTA Services General 57 % No 30 % First Time 5 PassesZ 22 % Less Than 6 Months 16 % Primary Language Disabled / Senior 15 % English 95 % 6 Months-2 Years 29 % Youth 5 % Spanish 5 % 2 Years-5 Years 22 % Medicare 1 % Other <1 % More Than 5 Years 28 % Median Household Income Automobile Ownership Frequency Of Using RTA Buses Under $7,500 28 % Yes 67 % First Time 3 % $7,500-$14,999 19 % No 33 % Less Than Once A Month 4 % $15,000-$24,999 16 % Less Than Once A Week 4 % Gender $25,000-$34,999 12 % Female 52 % 1-2 Days Per Week 14 % $35,000-$49,999 10 % Male 48% 3-4 Days Per Week 25% $50,000-$74,999 8 % 5 Days Per Week 26% Veteran Over $75,000 6 % Yes No 4% 96 % 6-7 Days Per Week 23% Highest Level Of Education Ethnicity Less Than High School 16 % Latino / Hispanic 37 % Customer Destinations High School Diploma 28 % School 37 % White / Caucasian 22 % Some College 34 % Work 27 % Black / African American 20 % Associate's Degree 8 % Shopping / Errands 11 % Mixed 10 % Bachelor's Degree 6 % Social / Recreational 10 % Asian / Pacific Islander 5 % Some Graduate School 3 % Other 9 % Other 3 % Graduate Degree 4 % Medical / Social Services 6 % American Indian 2 % Source: RTA COA Study (2013-2014) 1 Totals may not add to 100 percent due to rounding. z Go -Pass, U-Pass, and City Pass. E Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 RI —We Aq.—, Demographic Projections Deployment of future transit service will directly correspond to demographic and land use changes within the RTA service area. Demographic data such as population and employment density, income levels, age distributions, and land use development patterns are the primary variables that shape public transit in a community. Growth projections for the region are compiled by SCAG, the County of Riverside and WRCOG in collaboration with local jurisdictions. At the local level, jurisdictions have the ability to plan and revise land use and transportation characteristics to target a desired level of intensity for employment, housing, and commercial areas. On a regional scale, the highest population and employment densities in the RTA service area are generally concentrated in a small number of areas. The region's most populated area spans from Corona to Riverside and Moreno Valley, encompassing more than one-third of the estimated 1.9 million residents in western Riverside County3 and around half of the estimated 400,000 jobs in western Riverside County4. Communities such as these have more diverse land uses, making public transit a more viable option for travel. The majority of the jurisdictions in western Riverside County, however, consist of lower density, single types of land uses. Communities outside of the larger network centers are primarily suburban -residential. Employment -to -population ratios are lower in communities with a high concentration of single family residential units, requiring residents to rely heavily on private automobiles to complete daily trips. A market assessment, including a demographic analysis was conducted with the COA and identified the following trends: • By 2035, the population in western Riverside County is projected to reach 2.7 million people, an increase of 28 percent from the 2020 projected baseline. The highest rates of growth are expected to occur in areas that are currently suburban developments, though a comparable volume of growth will occur in the more densely populated, transit -supportive urban communities. • Employment in the RTA service area is expected to grow by 34 percent compared to the 2020 projected baseline. The 250,000 new jobs will bring the 2035 employment total to over one million. Similar to population, the rate of employment growth will be highest in the suburban markets. • The northwest sub -area (Corona, Eastvale, Home Gardens, Jurupa Valley, Norco, and Riverside) has the highest concentrations of population and employment in the RTA service area. However, outside of a few communities, future changes in density within the sub -area will remain moderate. Downtown Riverside is projected as an area of concentrated growth that can foster more opportunities for transit. The suburban communities in the City of Eastvale and along the Bellegrave Avenue corridor will be 3 RCTC Estimate based on State of California Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit (January 1, 2017) 4 SCAG RTP 2016-2040 Growth Forecast. 10 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 -Rj­lde Tra H Agency sites of larger population growth while employment increases are projected in Corona, Norco, and Eastvale along Hamner Avenue. The core of the sub -area will still be Downtown Riverside and the Magnolia Avenue -University Avenue corridor. Other residential communities in the northern portion of the sub -area will remain automobile - oriented communities because of the lack of mixed -use density. • In the Moreno Valley and Perris sub -area (Mead Valley, March Air Reserve Base, Moreno Valley, and Perris), growth will primarily occur outside of the existing core and in the outlying communities. Moreno Beach Drive and the areas south of the Lake Perris Reservoir will experience significant growth in population density. Most of the new employment is concentrated near the Riverside County Regional Medical Center. Serving the new residential areas would present a challenge for effective transit due to their distance from major corridors. Residential development will still be the dominant land use in the sub -area. Moreno Valley will remain a dense, residential community. Most of the population and employment density in Perris will remain focused around Perris Boulevard. • The Hemet, San Jacinto, and Pass sub -area (Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Hemet, and San Jacinto) is expected to undergo the highest rates of growth in the system. The increases are concentrated in the Beaumont and San Jacinto jurisdictions. The majority of the population growth in Beaumont will take place in the rural and suburban areas between Pennsylvania Avenue and Highland Springs Avenue. In San Jacinto, residential density will increase east of the State Street corridor. The sub -area employment growth is minimal and limited to a few key corridors, specifically along Sixth Street and Ramsey Street, Florida Avenue and State Street. Hemet will maintain transit -supportive densities and land uses in 2035. The Florida Avenue corridor is positioned to be the key corridor in the sub -area due to high levels of employment density. Although the rate of overall growth in the sub -area is significant, the future success of transit will largely depend on how the new development patterns interact with the existing ones to promote sustainable growth. • In the southwest sub -area (Canyon Lake, French Valley, Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Murrieta, Temecula, Wildomar, and Winchester), the key change will be the large concentration of employment growth in Murrieta along the 1-15 and 1-215 freeways. The change in density is particularly intense east of the 1-15 and will occur on currently undeveloped parcels. The only significant changes in population density occur in Winchester and Lake Elsinore, areas outside of the sub -area core. By 2035, Temecula and Murrieta are projected to have the highest density in the sub -area. More trip generators should be expected where higher population and employment densities are proposed. 1.3 FIXED -ROUTE AND PARA TRANSIT SERVICES As of July 1, 2018, RTA will operate 36 regional, local, rural, and trolley service routes, one RapiclLink limited stop route, and nine CommuterLink express routes. Routes in higher density 11 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 �' `p= H ipnry urban areas with greater peak ridership are usually operated with larger vehicles, while routes in suburban and rural areas with lower ridership are usually operated with smaller- to medium- sized vehicles. Table 3A contains a complete listing of both directly operated and contract operated routes. Fixed -route Services The service recommendations of the COA completed in 2015 classified all RTA fixed -route services under five service tiers. Each tier serves a different role in the network and has different expectations for service performance and frequencies. These tiers are: Frequent Key Corridor: Frequent key corridor routes form the core spine of the network and provide "lifestyle" transit options for riders. They have the highest ridership and performance in the system and the highest service frequencies (30 minute or better) to accommodate the high ridership. These routes have the most potential to support Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) services. The corridors identified in this tier are the RapidLink Gold Line and Route 1 corridor between UCR and Corona (primarily along University and Magnolia avenues) and the routes 16 and 19 corridor, with potential future RapidLink Blue Line service, between UCR and Perris Station Transit Center (though Riverside, Moreno Valley, and Perris). Supporting Local: Supporting local routes constitute the majority of the route network, providing connections to key employment centers, activity centers, and transfer hubs. They offer "lifeline" service for those dependent on transit while also providing connections to lifestyle services. Frequencies will vary depending on the market support for transit, but will be at least hourly. Regional Connectors: Regional connectors are longer distance routes that connect multiple urban centers separated by geographic gaps in density. These routes tend to have lower performance due to their longer distances and lower densities in the areas between the urban centers they connect. Frequencies are generally hourly. As their name suggests, these routes provide network connectivity between dispersed activity centers and between high and low density areas across the RTA service area. Community Feeders: Community feeders are shorter distance routes (including special trolley services) that connect key destinations within a community. They connect residents with local shopping centers, educational facilities, medical facilities or transit stations. CommuterLink: These routes are long-distance, peak -hour express services that provide both inter and intra county connections. They connect commuters directly with major employment centers or indirectly through connections at major multi -modal bus and rail hubs. 12 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 Ri a ,Ide Tra H Agency Paratransit Services RTA offers demand -response paratransit services known as "Dial -A -Ride" (DAR) to seniors (age 65 and above) and persons with disabilities. DAR is an origin -to -destination, advanced - reservation transportation service that travels to areas within three-quarters of a mile of an RTA fixed -route, excluding express services. These areas are referred to as the "DAR service area" and trips must begin and end in the service area. DAR service is provided at times equivalent to local fixed -route bus service in the area. RTA has three tvnes of DAR services: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Priority DAR Service: RTA gives priority service to individuals who are certified under ADA law. Persons who are ADA-certified are eligible for trips throughout the RTA service area that are within three-quarters of a mile of fixed -route bus service, excluding express routes and during the hours of fixed -route bus service operation. Senior and Disabled DAR Service: Seniors age 65 and above and persons with disabilities are eligible for local DAR service within a single city and within three-quarters of a mile during the hours of fixed -route bus service operation, excluding express service. Transportation is provided only within the city in which the trip begins. DAR Plus Service: In an effort to provide service to those who live in rural areas that have no access to public transportation, RTA began a program in July of 2015, DAR Plus, RTA Lifeline Service. This program extends the DAR service boundary by an additional two miles to qualified applicants needing life -sustaining services. The program provides wheelchair accessible taxi service to seniors aged 65 and over and to persons with disabilities for lifeline services such as doctor's appointments, dialysis and chemotherapy treatments, trips to the pharmacy, trips to the grocery store for food, and trips to the senior center to access hot meal service. 1.4 CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE The most recent change to the fare structure was in July 2013 when the Board of Directors approved a revision to include the addition of discounted fares for veterans and active duty military, police, and fire personnel as shown in the table below. Other fare categories were established in June 2009 after the last fare study which was completed in March 2009. A review of the current fare structure is anticipated over the next two years. 13 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 - FY21 Ri a ,Ide Tra H Agency Fare Categories Base Fares Day Pass* 7-Day Pass* 30-Day Pass* General $1.50 $4.00 $16.00 $50.00 Youth (grades 1-12)** $1.50 $4.00 $16.00 $35.00 Senior/Disabled** $0.70 $2.00 $16.00 $23.00 Medicare Card Holder $0.70 $2.00 $16.00 $23.00 Veteran** $0.70 $2.00 $16.00 $23.00 Child (46" tall or under) $0.25 N/A N/A N/A COMMUTERLINK FARES COMMUTERLINK• Fare Categories Base Fares Day Pass 30-Day Pass General $3.00 $7.00 $75.00 Youth (grades 1-12)** $3.00 $7.00 $75.00 Senior/Disabled** $2.00 $5.00 $50.00 Medicare Card Holder $2.00 $5.00 $50.00 Veteran** $2.00 $5.00 $50.00 Child (46" tall or under) $2.00 N/A N/A acceptedDAR FARES I Not on fixed -route buses Fare Categories Base Fares 10-Ticket Books Senior/Disabled $3.00 $30.00 Medicare Card Holder $3.00 $30.00 Child (46" tall or under) $0.50 N/A *Accepted as base fare. CommuterLink trips require an additional $1.30 (Senior, Disabled, Medicare, and Veteran) or $1.50 (General / Youth) per trip. **Proper identification is required at time of boarding. In addition to these fare categories, RTA also has U-Pass, Go -Pass, and City Pass programs. Cardholders of these programs get unlimited rides on any fixed -route, including CommuterLink, in the RTA network at no cost. Active duty military, police, and fire personnel in uniform with valid identification are also eligible for complimentary rides on RTA fixed -routes. Cooperative Fare and Subsidy Programs RTA makes every effort to create partnerships that will improve service for customers by developing fare programs that promote the use of public transit. In FY19, the following cooperative fare and subsidy programs are expected to continue: • California Baptist University- U-Pass Program • City of Riverside - City Pass for Employees • City of Temecula - Route 55 Temecula Trolley • County of Riverside - Route 50 Jury Trolley • La Sierra University- U-Pass Program • Moreno Valley College - Go -Pass Program • Mount San Jacinto College - Go -Pass Program • Norco College - Go -Pass Program 14 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 �' `p= H ipnry • Riverside City College (RCC) — Go -Pass Program • UCR — U-Pass Program, Route 51 Crest Cruiser • RCTC — Metrolink- Festival of Lights Shuttle College and university programs allow students with valid identification from these campuses to receive unlimited access to any of RTA's fixed -routes. These programs are funded by the institution or students. The City of Riverside subsidizes the City Pass fare program for its employees to ride the bus for free and serves as a pass outlet (Riverside Go Transit) for its residents by discounting 20 percent to 30 percent off on 7-day and 30-day passes, respectively. The Festival of Lights shuttle is a free service subsidized by RCTC and Metrolink that transports people from the Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station to Downtown Riverside on select weekends during the Festival of Lights. Other subsidized transit services include the trolley and circulator routes which are funded by UCR or local jurisdictions. 1.5 REVENUE FLEET As of March 2018, RTA has a total active fixed -route fleet size of 224 buses. The bus types consist of 145 Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)-powered 40-foot buses currently used for directly operated fixed -routes and 79 medium-sized buses for contracted fixed -routes. RTA also has an active fleet of 110 vehicles for operation of paratransit services, for a total of 334 revenue service vehicles. Table 1 shows a detailed inventory of the RTA fleet including all fleet vehicles active during FY18 and buses that are no longer in service. The RTA fleet is also California Air Resources Board (CARB) emissions compliant. The heavy duty CNG 40-foot buses used on directly operated routes generally cover more densely populated areas such as Riverside, Corona, Moreno Valley, and Perris while the medium-sized buses are typically used as local and express vehicles on contract operated fixed - routes in less densely populated communities. In FY17 through FY18, with the implementation of RapiclLink Gold Line and CommuterLink Route 200, the directly operated fixed -route fleet of 145 was fully deployed. The trolley fleet was reduced to five buses and it is expected to have five replacement trolleys delivered by the end of FY18. A further batch of four new medium-sized buses is expected to be delivered in summer 2018, allowing the replacement of the contingency fleet. Another batch of 37 new medium-sized buses and 39 paratransit vehicles will be delivered during FY19 to replace vehicles that have reached the end of their useful life. 15 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 -Riverside lra nsil MJency 1.6 EXISTING AND PLANNED FACILITIES Existing Facilities RTA's primary facility is located in the City of Riverside and RTA's secondary facility is located in the City of Hemet. RTA's Riverside facility is utilized for directly operated routes in the northern portion of the system network while RTA's Hemet facility is utilized for directly operated routes in the southern portion of the system network. As an effort to better utilize the available office space at Riverside and Hemet, Contract Operations, IT, and Travel Training staff will be moving to Hemet in July / August 2018. After this move, the Riverside facility will have 393 active employees on site and the Hemet facility will have 100 active employees on site. In FY19, RTA's contracted fixed -route service will continue to be provided by Empire Transportation, operating from a facility in Perris. DAR service is currently provided by Southland Transit, Inc. and is also based out of Perris. Both contractors are responsible for housing, operating, and maintaining RTA vehicles. The DAR facility in Perris also houses the DAR reservation call center. RTA offers taxi overflow through Network Paratransit. Planned Facilities The 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP / SCS) projects that by 2040 approximately 3.2 million people will live in Riverside County, compared to 2.3 million in 20165, and more than 1.1 million jobs will be located in Riverside County. As a result, RTA will need to expand transit service for the additional people expected to live in the county and provide transit access to the additional employment opportunities. RTA's current operations and maintenance facility in Riverside is at capacity, and the outdated layout of this facility results in a long and inefficient maintenance process with vehicles having to drive in a loop on Third Street to be serviced and washed. This facility cannot accommodate additional vehicles, consequently prohibiting the Agency's ability to expand transit service efficiently. Similarly, the Hemet facility has limitations, and in order to support RTA's service expansion plans identified in the Ten -Year Transit Network Plan, additional maintenance infrastructure would be needed. The Hemet Facility also poses logistical challenges that result in increased deadhead miles. A new central operations and maintenance facility will allow RTA to implement the service goals identified in the Ten -Year Transit Network Plan, reduce costly deadhead miles, increase operating efficiency, and allow the agency to accommodate ridership growth in western Riverside County. Moreover, RTA will use this new facility to implement new and emerging technologies such as electric and hybrid vehicles, solar power generation, etc. These new S State of California, Department of Finance, Report E-1, Released May 1, 2016 16 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 �' `p= H ipnry technologies will provide environmental benefits and promote sustainable business practices that will benefit the region and support the state's goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This would also open the opportunity to house the two contract operations arms into an owned and managed Agency facility. Contractors currently amortize their facility lease expenses into their hourly rate charged to the Agency. Providing them with turnkey facilities within the new Maintenance and Operations Facility would reduce that hourly rate thus reducing operating expenses. This would have a positive effect on the farebox recovery ratio and allow RTA staff to have closer oversight of the contractors' operations. RTA will conduct a needs analysis and produce a Facilities Masterplan and Implementation Plan for the new facility during FY19 — FY20. Site selection will evaluate a variety of locational factors such as lot size, distance to fixed - route service areas, comparison of reduced nonrevenue miles and operating cost, accessibility for Disadvantaged Communities, and Title VI compliance. The site selected will decrease deadhead hours and miles thus increase productivity and efficiency. The first phase of the project will include immediate -term improvements to allow RTA to use their current facilities until new location(s) can be built. Funding for site selection, land acquisition, and conceptual planning has been programmed and RTA has already secured over $12 million in Proposition 1B Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account (PTMISEA) funds toward the A&E, land acquisition, and construction phases of this project. In addition, RTA has programmed approximately $1.5 million in FTA 5339 program funds with the required local match funds and $2.8 million of LTF, and identified funding from the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) TUMF 2016 Nexus Study which was approved in July 2017. 1.7 EXISTING COORDINATION BETWEEN TRANSIT AGENCIES RTA is one of two designated Consolidated Transportation Services Agencies (CTSA) in Riverside County, the other being SunLine Transit Agency in the Coachella Valley. RTA's role as a CTSA is to assist RCTC in coordinating public transit throughout RTA's approximate 2,500-square-mile jurisdiction, support driver training and technical workshops, and assist with preparing grant applications. Regional Coordination RTA coordinates regional services with the Corona Cruiser and Pass Transit systems in the cities of Corona, Beaumont, and Banning. During FY17, Beaumont Pass Transit implemented new Route 136 which extended service into the City of Calimesa, though this arrangement will not continue beyond FY18 due to low ridership. In the City of Riverside, RTA coordinates with Riverside Special Services, which provides complementary ADA-compliant service to RTA's fixed -routes. Additionally, RTA staff periodically meets with social service providers, bus riders, 17 . -> . Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 -Riverside Tra nail Agency and other advocates through forums such as RCTC's Citizens Advisory Committee, RTA's ADA meetings, Transportation NOW (T-NOW) chapters, and surrounding regional transit operators. As a CTSA and federal grantee, RTA receives FTA funds and is responsible for monitoring the compliance of sub -recipients receiving such funds to federal regulations and policies. RTA continues to assist other agencies throughout western Riverside County with applying for federal funds such as the FTA § 5310 program. The projects funded through the 5310 program improve mobility for seniors and individuals with disabilities by removing barriers to transportation services and expanding the transportation mobility options available. The remaining projects funded through these programs include specialized public transportation initiatives that are targeted to assist low-income individuals, seniors, and persons with disabilities who require support beyond conventional public transit services to maintain their independence and mobility. Interregional Coordination and Transfer Agreements While most trips are completed within RTA's jurisdiction, there is a demand to provide connectivity to areas outside of this area. As such, RTA has collaborated with other transit agencies on agreements for funding splits and/or jurisdictional overlap, in order to further interregional connectivity via public transportation. As a result of these collaborations, RTA has transfer agreements with the following agencies: Metrolink, Omnitrans, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Corona Cruiser, SunLine, and Pass Transit. Metrolink tickets and passes are accepted on RTA fixed -routes that serve Metrolink stations during the period from one hour before to one hour after Metrolink service hours and are valid on the day of travel. Fare media from Omnitrans and Pass Transit are accepted at transfer locations at the equivalent base fare rate, excluding CommuterLink service, on the day of travel. Corona Cruiser fare media are accepted at transfer locations and adjacent stops. OCTA fare media is accepted for base fare on CommuterLink routes 200 and 205 at transfer locations in Orange County as well as La Sierra Metrolink between RTA routes 15, 200, and OCTA Route 794. Current and retired employees as well as dependents of Omnitrans and OCTA are eligible to ride at no cost any local fixed -route or CommuterLink in the RTA service area. In FY18, as part of the introduction of new CommuterLink Route 200, RTA and Omnitrans reached agreement to allow Route 200 to include a stop at Downtown San Bernardino Transit Center. RTA also reached agreement with OCTA and City of Anaheim to allow Route 200 to serve stops in Anaheim including Harbor Blvd at Disneyland, The two agencies also coordinated on developing a new transfer point in South Fontana for RTA routes 21 and 49, and Omnitrans Route 82, as well as make provision for space for future Omnitrans service at the new Amazon Eastvale transit hub. In FY19, RTA will continue to collaborate with these agencies to provide options for enhanced interregional connectivity via transfer and funding agreements and jurisdictional overlap. 18 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 Rwu lde 7r-0 p je y CHAPTER 2: ROUTE PERFORMANCE AND EXISTING SERVICE 2.1 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RTA evaluates and plans for its services using the RTA Board -adopted Service Standards and Warrants metrics and those set by RCTC's Annual State of Public Transit Report, which are both updated annually. Service Standards and Warrants The Service Standards and Warrants guidelines are design standards that set the requirements for a minimum level of service that respects service quality characteristics such as route structure, service area coverage, operating hours and on -time performance. There are several factors that are typically considered when objectively measuring service performance. These factors, used in conjunction with the Annual State of Public Transit Report, help determine whether service is cost effective. OF SERVICE STANDARDSSUMMARY Population Density Density is determined by the number of people housed per square mile or the number of employees per square mile. RTA aims to provide at least 85 percent of all residences, places of work, high schools, colleges, and shopping centers with access to bus service. Route Classifications RTA service can be classified into five fixed -route tiers; frequent key corridor, supporting local, regional connector, community feeder, and CommuterLink. Complementary to the fixed -route service is DAR. See Table 3A for the route classification of each route. Span of Service The span of service or the hours of operation refers to the start and end time of a route. The span of service will vary based on the demand in the community and the classification of the route. Bus Stop Spacing and Depending on the population density, bus stop spacing in urban areas usually Amenities averages about 1,500 ft. (.28 miles) to 2,500 ft. (.47 miles). As service approaches more suburban and rural areas, bus stop spacing may be limited to locations with accessible curb and gutters and sidewalks suitable for ADA compliance. The new bus stop spacing standards allows spacing of 0.25 to 0.33 miles for support local, regional, and community feeder routes; 0.25 to 0.5 miles for frequent key corridor local service; and 0.5 mile stop spacing for Rapid Link service. Bus stops with 10 or more average weekday boardings may qualify for a shelter, and the stops with 5 or more boardings may qualify for a bench, subject to funding availability that is determined in the annual budget process. These standards were adopted in the Bus Stop Strategic Plan (2015) On -Time RTA requires that no bus shall leave a time point early and should arrive at a time Performance point no later than six minutes after the scheduled arrival time. This limit is appropriate for RTA's service area due to the average distance traveled by each route and the combined rural and urban areas. 19 . -> . Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21—R+­side Tra nail Agency Headways Headways are the timed intervals between each scheduled trip within a fixed -route (Frequency) bus (e.g., the bus runs every 30 minutes). Headways range anywhere from every 15 minutes to every 120 minutes depending on the density and are aimed at operating in 15 minute increments for frequent key corridors supporting local and regional connector tiers. Community feeders and CommuterLink routes may vary depending on demand. Transfer Wait Time Transfer Wait Time refers to the amount of time a passenger has to wait when transferring from one mode of transportation to the next, whether it is bus or rail. In more UZAs such as downtown Riverside, average transfer wait times should not be longer than approximately 20 minutes. In smaller urbanized and even in rural areas, the average transfer wait time can reach up to 30 to 45 minutes depending on the frequencies of the routes in the area. Load Factor (Maximum Depending on the bus, the maximum number of passengers should not exceed 150 Vehicle Loads) percent of the seating capacity or the legal weight limit of the bus. DAR vehicles should not exceed 100 percent of the seated capacity. Source: RTA's Service Standards and Warrants (2012), Bus Stop Strategic Plan (2015) Productivity vs. Coverage Target To help improve effectiveness and efficiency of its operations, RTA sets a target for the productivity level of service to operate. In order to meet the productivity requirements and continue to provide coverage to the areas where the service performance is below the productivity standard but the transit service is needed by transportation disadvantaged people, RTA has adopted the standards requiring 60 percent of their fixed -route service to perform up to productivity standards while the remaining 40 percent of fixed -routes operate to maintain coverage. In this way, the service exceeding the performance standards enables a minimal level of operations in areas of need where the performance standards are not met. Given RTA's diverse and widespread service area, the service is provided to the areas based on the need to provide coverage. The 60 / 40 split establishes a benchmark for the productive service to meet mandatory farebox recovery. Furthermore, it also allows for new service to be implemented following TDA guidelines for exemption based on performance standards within the year when the service was implemented and the two subsequent fiscal years. This objective also enables RTA to maintain highly productive service and still meet the requirements of Title VI. It is the policy of RTA to ensure compliance with Title VI so that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin under any transit program or activity. 20 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 =R-r Ri—side Tra H AgpR� Warrants for New Service The Service Standards and Warrants are also used as a guide for the implementation of new service. New service is exempt from meeting the required criteria for up to two years plus the year of commencement. New service is evaluated during this initial period using the Service Standards and Warrants and the Annual State of Public Transit Report. The objective is to give a route time to perform up to standards, or it may be discontinued. Annual State of Public Transit Report RCTC's Annual State of Public Transit Report is based on audited information of operators after the end of the preceding fiscal year. 2.2 EXISTING FIXED -ROUTE AND Dial -A -Ride SERVICE In FY18, RTA budgeted 874,095 revenue hours for the operation of 13.4 million revenue miles system -wide. Total revenue hours budgeted was 662,102 for fixed -routes and 211,992 for DAR and taxi service. Total revenue miles included 9,782,252 for fixed -routes and 3,596,554 million for DAR and taxi. Until 2014, passenger growth exceeded projections due to factors such as significant increases in pass programs, customer satisfaction, high gasoline prices, and a high unemployment rate. In FY16, ridership dipped due to continued improvements in the economy coupled with continued low gas prices have led a decline in system -wide ridership. In FY19, RTA will enjoy a full year of ridership from FY18 service improvements, including the addition of new RapidLink Gold Line service in August 2017, upgrading the Perris -Moreno Valley Route 19 frequency weekdays to every 15 minutes, and implementing new CommuterLink routes 200 (San Bernardino -Riverside -Anaheim) and 205 (Temecula -Corona -Village at Orange). These improvements have shown positive returns, and, together with a range of proposed new FY19 service improvements (see Section 3.2), are projected to help increase ridership for FY19 over FY18 actual ridership, while establishing a foundation for sustainable ridership in the long- term. 2.3 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS Improving productivity is a priority for service delivery. Performance measures, particularly farebox recovery and passengers per hour, are monitored regularly. These two measurements are key factors in evaluating the performance of individual routes and allow resources to be 21 -T Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 �' `p=-;, ipnry reallocated from underperforming routes or trips to establish improved service on high - performing routes with more potential for ridership growth. For FY19, this process has led to more equitable weekend service across several routes, as well as greater investment in routes 19, 200, 205, and RapidLink Gold Line, while addressing low performing trips across the network. In order to identify underperforming trips and routes, the following metrics were used: • Trips (or sequence of trips) with less than six boardings were subject to discontinuation. • Less than 20 boardings per trips for peak trips above base service frequency where an additional vehicle and/or operator were deployed were subject to discontinuation. • Route service days with less than six passengers per revenue service hour were subject to reduction in frequency. 2.4 POTENTIAL GROWTH MARKETS The school -related and work -related trips are RTA's traditional growth markets. Customer surveys conducted in 2013 during the COA indicated that approximately 35 percent of trips were to and from college or school. Similarly, over 27 percent of trips were for work purposes, while 21 percent were for retail or recreational purposes. These market segments will remain critical to ridership growth. Growth in the student market in the past has been attributable to new pass programs with local colleges and universities, outreach to schools, and reduced school district transportation programs at the secondary level. RTA continues to make every effort to reach out to schools to coordinate transit service with school bell schedules and attendance boundaries. At the college level, RTA continues to develop and build relationships with college and university officials to improve transportation for their students through pass programs and enhanced services that meet the needs of students, such as later evening trips. Pass usage for FY18 saw a small increase in activity over FY17, which is expected to continue in FY19 as new service improvements make it easier for students to get to and from their respective campuses. The CommuterLink market has been hit the hardest by the low gas prices as well as the increasing popularity of the 91 / Perris Valley passenger rail line, which has affected parallel RTA services. The amenities on the CommuterLink routes such as the high -back upholstered seating, reading lights, free Wi-Fi, and USB charging stations are added values to the service that attract and retain customers. This service type will continue to be monitored and service levels adjusted, in line with demand. 22 => . Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21—R+­ide Tra nail Agency The COA study completed in 2015 clearly pointed to the need for significant service improvements concentrated on four core themes: 1. Frequency of Service: Ridership and customer survey data strongly pointed to service frequency as the key improvement required for RTA services to be attractive and have the capacity to grow. 2. Connectivity: Surveys also pointed to the need to better coordinate RTA services at key connection points, especially where low frequency services meet. 3. Streamlining: Changes need to focus on routing on major streets and corridors to reduce circuitous routing, duplication of service, and to improve travel times and ease of understanding of the transit network. 4. Span of Service: Surveys pointed clearly to the need to accommodate demand for later service in areas near major employment centers, colleges, and universities. RTA will continue to explore service changes that address these key service attributes. Market conditions alone can no longer be relied upon to retain existing and attract new ridership. 2.5 PASSENGER TRANSIT FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT AND PASSENGER AMENITIES Existing Passenger Transit Facilities In addition to improvements to service frequency and expanding service, the Ten -Year Transit Network Plan recommends the creation of a Timed Transfer System (TTS) and improving support infrastructure such as transit hubs to meet the growing demand for transit service in the most efficient manner. It's neither feasible nor cost effective to run direct service from every trip origin to destination; therefore, the only system that can meet the growing demand efficiently is one that enables timed transfer connections from one service or mode to another. Strategically placed transit hubs are essential to making a TTS work at its optimum. Furthermore, transit hubs are more than just a place to make bus connections. They can be community -centered, multi -modal facilities where bus and rail customers share a selection of mobility choices. These modes of travel can include single -occupancy vehicles, carpools, vanpools, bicycles, pedestrian walkways, local and commuter express buses, and light rail and regional rail networks. Transit hubs are generally owned by various public agencies and are well -situated for the advancement of public -private investment partnerships leading to transit - oriented commercial and residential development. 23 Short Range Transit Plan 9 FY19 — FY21 =JIMRh-WE ,W-,t,qpmLy The following is a summary of the existing transit facilities in the RTA service area: Perris Station Transit Center: This transit center is located in the City of Perris at C Street and 4th Street (SR-74) and has eight bus bays served by seven RTA routes. The facility handles multi - modal transfers between Metrolink; RTA local, regional, and express routes; and park -and -ride patrons in the southwest region. Corona Transit Center: This transit center is located in the City of Corona off Grand Boulevard and North Main Street and includes eight bus bays and a pedestrian bridge to trains at the North Main Corona Metrolink Station. Galleria at Tyler Bus Stop Improvements: The demand for enhanced connections and improved bus stop amenities prompted RTA to improve the stops at the Galleria Mall at Tyler, which serves ten routes. The upgrade was completed in October 2014 and nearly doubled the size of the facility, which now includes six bus bays with new passenger shelters equipped with solar lighting. The facility also includes real-time arrival and departure information and customer amenities that comply with ADA design standards. Reinforced concrete bus pads were installed to protect the roadway and increase the useful life of this facility. Further improvements were made in 2017 to add two additional stops on Magnolia Avenue to accommodate new RapidLink Gold Line service. Moreno Valley Mall Transfer Station: Similar to the Galleria at Tyler, the transit facility at Moreno Valley Mall is integral toward establishing transfers within RTA's network. Completed in March 2015, the upgraded facility, which now serves eight RTA bus routes, has tripled in size to include six upgraded bus bays with pedestrian amenities that comply with ADA design standards. New bus shelters with solar lighting, information kiosks, benches, and trash receptacles were installed. Concrete bus pads were also installed to preserve the roadway and increase the useful life of the stop. On average, more than 1,500 boardings and alightings occur at this station every day. 24 = > . Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 -Riverside Tra nail Agency Downtown Riverside Stop Improvements: This project has facilitated an on -street grid system for transit in downtown Riverside and closure of the Riverside Downtown Transit Terminal. The operating plan, aimed at modernizing the service in downtown Riverside by creating an on - street grid system, was a key recommendation from the COA. The operating plan improved passenger transfers, consolidated routes to enhance service delivery and boosted productivity, and reduced the number of buses traveling to downtown thereby improving traffic circulation. The A&E phase for this project was completed in December 2015 and construction was completed in December 2016. This project was completed in time for the January 2017 service change and closure of the Riverside Downtown Transit Terminal. RapidLink Gold Line (Corona to UCR Corridor): RTA identified the corridor between UCR and Corona primarily along University and Market / Magnolia Avenues as a candidate for limited - stop service. More than 9,000 customers use bus services along this corridor on weekdays. RTA completed A&E and construction of the RapidLink Gold Line stops, and service launched in August 2017. Fifteen bus stops were upgraded to include bus shelters with solar lighting, benches and trash cans as well as new RapidLink signage on the shelter roof. Transit Enhancements: During FY18, thirty-eight stops were enhanced which included adding or replacing shelters, benches and trash cans. Examples of small scale transit enhancement projects completed during the last fiscal year are listed below: • The Los Alamos at Murrieta Gateway Enhancement Project enhanced a stop with a transit shelter and new passenger amenities to accommodate the growth in ridership at the stop. • The Mission Trail at Malaga Stop Improvement Project enhanced a stop with new civil improvements such as a shelter and passenger amenities to accommodate the growth in ridership at the stop. Planned Passenger Transit Facilities Bus Stops Improvement Program Implementation: The Bus Stop Strategic Policy was approved by RTA's Board of Directors in June 2015. This program uses a two -tiered approach to the allocation of new bus stop amenities within the allocated funding of an annual Bus Stop Improvement Program. The two tiers focus on ridership and geographic equity respectively, providing a more balanced distribution of improvements across the service area compared to a methodology purely focused on ridership (which is biased towards more UZAs). Tier 1 is prioritized based on the ridership per stop across all RTA bus stops. This tier covers 50 percent of bus stops receiving improvements as part of the program and ensures the network's busiest bus stops receive some priority. Tier 2 is prioritized on an equitable allocation based on each jurisdiction's population and ridership. This approach to allocation of amenities will cover the remaining 50 percent of bus stops receiving improvements as part of the program and will 25 . -> . Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 -Riverside Tra nail Agency ensure a balance between need and geographic equity. In conjunction with the tiers, there are also a number of other criteria such as a limit per jurisdiction, ADA compliance, available space, and limited stop ridership threshold. RTA initiated bulk procurement of shelters, benches, and trash receptacles in fall 2016 in groups of 25. The first 25 locations have been completed in FY18 in accordance with the Bus Stop Strategic Policy. In addition to those locations, seven additional locations have been enhanced to address operations and safety related issues. RTA plans to complete the next 25 over the next year along with improvements to at least eight additional locations to address operations and safety issues. RapidLink Blue Line (UCR to Perris Corridor): The UCR to Perris Metrolink Station corridor through Moreno Valley and Perris has also been identified as a second candidate for limited - stop service due to its high ridership. Dubbed the RapidLink Blue Line, this service will be implemented once funding is secured. In the meantime, improvements to routes 16 and 19 have been implemented to build additional ridership along this busy corridor. University of California, Riverside Mobility Hub: Currently, 21 percent of UCR's population ride RTA buses. UCR is one of the busiest transit destinations in the Agency's transit network, with over 1,785 boardings and alightings reported on an average weekday. Planned service improvements, the popular U-Pass Program, parking price increases, increased congestion, and resulting environmental and sustainability challenges are projected to contribute toward positive ridership gains in the future. The current on -street bus stops at UCR located on Canyon Crest Drive are utilized by routes 1, 16, 51, 52, 204, and RapidLink Gold Line. This stop currently does not have the space, bus shelters or other amenities essential to effectively accommodate the current and planned service levels. The proposed UCR Mobility Hub would have an efficient bus turnaround to allow more direct routing, eliminating excess travel on local streets currently needed to turn the buses around. The estimated annual operating and capital cost savings through operational efficiencies gained by implementing the proposed UCR Mobility Hub are estimated at $600,000. In turn, these cost savings and buses will be reallocated to assist in implementing increased service as recommended in the Ten -Year Transit Network Plan. The proposed UCR Mobility Hub will have capacity for six buses and be utilized by current routes 1, 16, 51, 52, 204, and RapidLink Gold Line and proposed RapidLink Blue Line. The project will also add amenities such as, bus shelters, benches, trash receptacles, security features, drought -tolerant landscaping, traffic signalization, connectivity to UCR's bicycle amenities, and better integration with the existing City of Riverside bike lanes and trails. This project reflects an ongoing partnership between UCR and RTA; these two agencies entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in June 2017 to deliver the project. In addition to the mobility hub, UCR is going to improve bicycle and pedestrian connections throughout the campus, making it easier for students and faculty to access the hub. UCR awarded a contract for 26 -T Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 �' `p=-;, ip,,,y A&E work to Gruen Associates. A final conceptual plan was completed and initial A&E, as well as environmental clearance process, has been initiated. A construction schedule will be determined once the environmental clearance process is completed. Promenade Mall Mobility Hub: RTA and the City of Temecula worked together to identify a project site located at Promenade Mall in Temecula. Promenade Mall is a 1.1 million -square - foot shopping mall with more than 100 retail establishments, dozens of restaurants, and a movie theater complex. Since its inception in 1999, Promenade Mall has become a key shopping, dining, and entertainment venue in the City of Temecula. It is essential for RTA to expand its public transit infrastructure in order to accommodate the growing demand in service from the ever increasing number of people traveling to and from the Promenade. The Promenade Mall currently has a single bus stop that serves seven RTA bus routes: 55, 79, 202, 205, 206, 208, and 217. In partnership with RTA, Promenade Mall, and the City of Temecula completed the conceptual plan that outlines design recommendations for the proposed expansion of Promenade Mall's current single bus stop. The Conceptual Plan for this project was approved by the RTA Board of Directors and the contract for A&E work was awarded in April 2017. A&E work was completed in December 2017. RTA has also completed the funding package for the construction phase of this project by securing approximately $1.7 million from the TUMF program. Construction bids were released in February 2018 and a contract was awarded to Environmental Construction, Inc. in April 2018. The upgraded facility is projected for completion in January 2019. Hemet Mobility Hub: Today, about 150,000 people reside in the Hemet -San Jacinto Valley, a rapidly growing area in western Riverside County. The City of Hemet has a projected population of 126,500 in 20406, a 58 percent increase from 80,070 in 20167. Population growth will result in an increased demand for transit service in the area. The City of Hemet developed a Downtown Specific Plan in April 2017. The City's Downtown Specific Plan has identified a need for an intermodal mobility hub to meet the projected demand for local and regional transit services such as bus, rail, car, bike sharing, Uber, and Lyft. The intermodal mobility hub will also serve as a park -and -ride facility and include solar power and electric vehicle (EV) charging stations to support emerging EV technologies. Furthermore, the potential extension of commuter rail service from the City of Perris to Hemet / San Jacinto (currently being studied by RCTC in their rail feasibility study) could also benefit from the intermodal mobility hub. The plan identifies a city owned 14.5 acre site as the Transit Oriented District (TOD) and includes plans for a multi -modal mobility hub. The hub will be central to the Hemet Civic Center to the south, the County Administrative Center to the north, and the Hemet Valley Hospital complex to the east. A substantial portion of this site will be available to transit supportive land 6 SCG 2016-2040 RTP / SCS, Demographics and Growth Forecast California Department of Finance, Report E-1 27 -r Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 �' `p=-;, ipnry uses that could be developed through public -private partnerships. The plan envisions a transit oriented development that will include housing, retail, office, public spaces, and entertainment venues that will include energy -efficient sustainable design features to fully activate the mobility hub to be a thriving community activity center. The vision for the project creates an opportunity to use cap -and -trade funding. The proposed Hemet Mobility Hub will address current and future mobility, sustainability, and efficiency needs of the City of Hemet and RTA. It will have the capacity to anchor RTA routes 27, 31, 32, 33, 42, 74, 79, 212, and 217 that currently serve the Hemet -San Jacinto Valley and other modes planned for this site (car and bike sharing, TNCs, EV charging, etc.). RTA will construct a mobility hub in partnership with the City of Hemet. On October 27, 2016, the RTA Board of Directors approved staff's recommendation to enter into a MOU with the City of Hemet to prepare a conceptual plan. A contract was awarded for A&E in April 2017 to PSOMAS. Site selection, conceptual planning, and initial design were completed in April 2018. In FY18 into early FY19, RTA will complete environmental work and final design of the mobility hub. RTA is currently working on the funding plan for the construction phase of this project and intends to utilize a mix of funds from sources such as FTA 5339 and TUMF. Mount San Jacinto College Mobility Hub: Founded in 1963, MSJC is part of the California Higher Education System, one of the largest systems of higher education in the nation. MSJC has a student population of over 5,000. Currently, RTA provides both local and commuter fixed - route service to the college campus. RTA routes 31, 32, 74, 212, and 217 all serve MSJC San Jacinto campus and provide an opportunity for people living throughout western Riverside County to travel to and from the campus. There is a strong incentive for students to use transit as MSJC is a member of the Go -Pass Program which allows students to take unlimited rides on fixed -route service which is paid through student fees. The Go -Pass program has been successful in generating an average of 25,000 boardings per month at MSJC campus locations. MSJC projects that the student population will increase to 10,600 by 2020. In order to accommodate growth in ridership, RTA plans to improve the MSJC San Jacinto campus bus stop. The existing location accommodates only two buses to stop at a time for passenger drop-off and pick-up. The site has two bus shelters with passenger amenities that provide some level of comfort for those waiting for a bus and protection from inclement weather. RTA is planning to expand the facility to allow additional buses to stop at this location. The MSJC San Jacinto Mobility Hub will also include additional shelters, security features, and improved pedestrian access that is consistent with the ADA 2010 Standards for Accessibility Design guidelines. Such improvements will allow RTA to accommodate future ridership growth as the college and the surrounding areas continue to grow in the coming years. In addition, the Hemet -San Jacinto region is recognized in RTA's Ten -Year Transit Network Plan as one of the fastest growing regions in the RTA service area. As part of an effort to improve service delivery in the region, RTA is examining opportunities to improve major destinations 28 -T Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 �' `p=-;, ipnry and stops to help facilitate passenger connections. As transit ridership grows, the MSJC Mobility Hub in San Jacinto will become a focal point of transit services in the Hemet -San Jacinto area. Long-term plans indicate that passenger rail service may extend out to this area which would necessitate the need for an improved transfer interface between bus and rail. Until these long range projects are complete, the MSJC Mobility Hub will function as one of the key locations in the Hemet -San Jacinto for passengers to transfer between buses. Vine Street Mobility Hub: The City of Riverside's General Plan 2025 identified Vine Street as one of the preferred locations within downtown Riverside for a new mobility hub due to its proximity to major employment centers, county and city government centers, UCR, Riverside Community College, the Convention Center, multiple entertainment venues, and urban housing complexes. Thus, the Vine Street Mobility Hub will function as a regional multi -modal transportation hub that supports connectivity between multiple transit agencies such as RTA and SunLine Transit Agency in Riverside County; Omnitrans, the public transit provider in San Bernardino County; and Metrolink, the commuter rail service provider for Southern California. The Vine Street Mobility Hub is to be located on land across from the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station on Vine Street. This project is essential to support a future multimodal transportation network that will address the future mobility, sustainability, quality of life needs of this region, and RTA's long range transit plan. The mobility hub would be designed and developed with emerging technologies, renewable energy sources, and mobility solutions in mind. Nontraditional modes such as station cars, shared bikes, electric mobility units, etc., will play a pivotal role in addressing the first and last mile mobility challenges to the region. In the immediate term, RTA has constructed an interim on -street layover facility at Vine Street to accommodate the buses operating throughout downtown Riverside. Once funding is secured and the land is transferred, RTA will design and construct the hub in partnership with the City of Riverside, RCTC, downtown business owners, and various key stakeholder groups. RTA plans to initiate the procurement process for conceptual planning once land acquisition is completed. "First and Last Mile" Mobility Plan: In 2014, RTA was awarded a Federal § 5304 grant to develop a "First and Last Mile" Mobility Plan. In alignment with federal transportation goals, the objective of this project is to establish a plan that identifies cost-effective improvements to solve first and last mile barriers for commuters who could potentially take transit, but whose origin or destination cannot be conveniently accessed from the nearest transit facility due to distance, terrain, or real or perceived safety issues. This study began in January 2016 and was completed in the spring of 2017, providing templates for future "First and Last Mile" improvements with six pilot location types that are common throughout the RTA service area. This study runs concurrently with WRCOG's Active Transportation study. RTA is working closely with WRCOG staff on coordinating the two plans. The end result will include recommended projects, cost estimates, suggested funding sources, and an outreach summary. 29 => . Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21—R+­ide Tra nail Agency La Sierra Metrolink Station Bus Stops: La Sierra Station is emerging as a major intermodal mobility hub with regional benefits and an opportunity of facilitating Timed Transfer connections (TTC). RCTC is expanding the parking area at Metrolink La Sierra Station. This station expansion project includes new bus bays with passenger amenities, which will support RTA's goal of implementing timed transfer connections and intermodal connectivity between rail and bus. RTA and RCTC staff will work together to design a mobility hub that is truly intermodal and supports emerging technologies and shared mobility options such as bike and car sharing and TNCs. Perris Valley Line (PVL) Metrolink Stations: In June 2016, RTA commenced serving the multi - modal stations developed by RCTC along the new PVL. The new PVL stations are Hunter Park Station, Moreno Valley -March Station, Downtown Perris, and South Perris Station. Equipment and Passenger Amenities Intelligent Transportation System (ITS): The ITS network brings functionalities that improve the operational workflow, both internally and externally. Sophisticated automatic vehicle locator programs allow the bus dispatch center to track the location of every equipped bus for schedule adherence and passenger loads. This feature greatly enhances schedule performance and monitoring of ridership patterns. RTA is currently finalizing the replacement and expansion of the Agency's ITS system. Installation of the new system began in December 2015 and the fixed -route fleet is fully equipped. New LED signs will be installed and the project completed by July of 2018. This new system has expanded ITS technology from the previous 97 buses to all 224 fixed -route buses, allowing for RTA personnel to have real-time visibility and control of all fixed -route vehicles. The system provides RTA's planning and operations departments with essential historical data, related to on -time performance and passenger boardings and alightings, which allows the departments to make informed service modification decisions. For the Maintenance Department, this system monitors onboard vehicle components and reports performance measures and system faults to key maintenance personnel, reducing the likelihood that a mechanical or electrical issue continues unnoticed, resulting in more reliable vehicles and an improved passenger experience. Additionally, this new system will improve the security of passengers and personnel, providing the dispatch center and public safety personnel with the ability to view real-time onboard surveillance video during an emergency event. Finally, with this new ITS system, every fixed - route vehicle will be equipped to provide free Wi-Fi to passengers. Scheduling and Operations Software Project: RTA plans to begin procurement of the Transit Scheduling and Operations software in early 2019. This software will allow RTA to create its 30 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 �' `p= H ipnry own efficient schedules, vehicle blocking, run -cuts, and rosters without relying on a vendor to provide such services. It would also allow improved operations management by integrating the daily crew and vehicle rostering and other operational functions into one system to improve the efficiency and administration of these processes. Advanced Traveler Information System (ATIS): RTA has also introduced the ATIS technology with LED signage, known as SmartStops, which relay real-time arrival information on display at major transfer points. As part of the ITS upgrade program, new SmartStops will be installed at transit centers in the cities of Perris and Corona. Passengers may also lookup real-time arrival information via RTA's BusWatch website and mobile application. The next phase of the ATIS project included querying and alerting of bus arrivals via text messaging, which was recently completed with the upgraded ITS program. Mobile application development is also part of this project, which allows passengers to lookup real-time arrival information for all RTA fixed - routes. Transit Signal Priority (TSP): TSP is a tool that allows transit vehicles to travel through controlled intersections faster and more conveniently. Unlike signal pre-emption which is used on emergency vehicles, TSP technology on a bus utilizes a transmitter that allows the traffic signals along major streets to remain in "green" mode for several seconds longer, therefore allowing a late -running bus to advance more quickly along its route to maintain on -time performance. TSP is currently being used on Route 1 along the University Avenue and Magnolia Avenue corridors. RTA is working with other jurisdictions to deploy this technology to other corridors. Illuminated Bus Stops: In FY18 — FY19, RTA intends to purchase materials and supplies to expand and upgrade the bus stop system with a total of 50 (25 each year) security -enhancing illuminated bus stop devices which come equipped with down -lighting. These features are push-button activated by the customer and allow drivers to recognize when a person is waiting at a bus stop at night in areas with limited or no lighting. The down -lighting safety feature and illuminated schedule provides bus scheduling information for easy visibility in a night time environment. 31 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 Rwu lde 7r-0 p je y CHAPTER 3: RECENT AND PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES 3.1 RECENT SERVICE CHANGES Service expansions implemented in FY18 are listed below: • August 2017: a. New RapidLink Gold Line limited -stop service began in August 2017. • January 2018: a. Frequency improvements were made to routes 19, 29, and 49. b. Routes 3 and 29 were extended to serve the new Amazon fulfillment center in Eastvale. c. New CommuterLink Express routes 200 (San Bernardino, Riverside, Anaheim) and 205 (Temecula -Corona -Village at Orange) began operation. 3.2 PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES In FY19, RTA will enjoy a full year of ridership from FY18 initiatives listed in section 3.1 above. The preparation of the FY19 service plan began with a performance review of fixed -route bus service and the resulting findings influenced adjustments to service levels on selected RTA routes to improve service reliability, increase ridership, and improve efficiency. Additional budget has been included in FY19 for the following service improvements to improve reliability, boost ridership, and improve financial sustainability: • Route 22, one of RTA's longest local bus routes (35 miles long) will be split into two separate routes at Perris to improve reliability: a. Route 22 (Perris -Riverside Downtown) b. New Route 9 (Lake Elsinore -Perris) • Route 24: a. Weekday's service frequency will be improved from every 80 to 60 minutes. b. RTA will work to expand this service east to better serve the SR-79 Temecula Parkway corridor. c. The Temecula Library deviation will be discontinued due to low ridership and the significant impact this has on service frequency and travel times for other riders. • Route 27, RTA's longest existing local route (52 miles long) will be split into two separate routes at Perris to improve reliability: a. Route 27 (Perris -Riverside Galleria Mall) will operate daytime weekdays every 40 minutes (generally hourly now). 32 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 Riverside Tra H Agency b. Route 28 (Hemet -Perris) will operate direct from Hemet to Perris with Route 61 extended from Sun City (Menifee) to Perris in place of the former Route 27. c. Route 28 daytime weekdays will be improved to operate every 30 minutes (generally hourly now). d. Both routes 27 and 28 will continue to operate hourly evenings and weekends. e. Route 61 will be extended from Sun City (Menifee) to Perris in place of existing Route 27. f. Route 212 would be discontinued to avoid unnecessary duplication of service. • Route 31 from Moreno Valley to Beaumont and Hemet will have its last weekdays evening departure an hour later at 8:42 p.m. • Route 33 will have service weekdays expanded to serve Tahquitz High School in Hemet with an additional westbound trip weekdays at 6.00 a.m. • Route 40 will be streamlined and expanded to serve more of the City of Menifee, including MSJC Menifee Valley Campus, the Heritage Lakes area, and McCall Blvd east of the 1-215 freeway. • Route 200 will have additional trips added at peak times weekdays in response to high ridership on selected existing trips. • Routes 205/206: RTA will work to add a stop in the Indian Truck Trail / 1-15 Freeway area of Temescal Valley. • RapidLink Gold Line morning service will begin at 6:30 a.m. instead of the current 5:30 a.m. due to low ridership prior to 6:30 a.m. Afternoon service will begin at 1:30 p.m. instead of the current 2:30 p.m. to meet peak demand times on Route 1, which the Gold Line supplements. • A comprehensive revision of weekend service in the south and eastern areas of RTA service area will for the first time in RTA history provide seven day service on all RTA local routes (excluding special weekday shuttle routes 26, 50, 51, 52, 54, and 55), adding Saturday and / or Sunday service on the following routes and route segments: a. Route 30 Perris East loop b. Route 31 Beaumont- Moreno Valley c. Route 33 East Hemet d. Route 40 Lake Elsinore-Menifee e. Route 42 Hemet -San Jacinto-Soboba Casino f. Route 61 Temecula-Murrieta-Menifee-Perris g. Route 74 San Jacinto-Hemet-Winchester-Menifee-Perris h. Route 79 Hemet -Winchester -Temecula 03 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21—RI—id.. Tr —it Ag ency This major initiative will be sustainably implemented through adjusted service frequencies Saturdays and / or Sundays on routes 3, 8, 23, 31, 41, 61, 74, and 79, consistent with existing weekends ridership per hour of service on these routes. Also, the Saturday Route 30 west loop, weekends Route 19F Perris Fairgrounds shuttle, and Route 3 south of Corona Transit Center will be discontinued due to very low ridership and available alternative routes. With the availability of automatic passenger counting equipment on all fixed -route buses since May 2017, RTA has also reviewed ridership of all trips on all routes and a small number of trips on all routes with very low ridership are planned to be discontinued in September 2018. This approach minimizes the impact on existing riders while helping make the service overall more financially sustainable and helping to avoid the need for a fare rise. In partnership with Metrolink rail service, RTA plans to again operate Route 54 shuttle service for Riverside's Mission Inn Festival of Lights on four Friday / Saturday evenings in November / December 2018. This shuttle provides sufficient capacity not available on regular Route 54 Downtown Riverside Metrolink Shuttle and is very well used, helping reduce traffic congestion at this very popular event. This will be the third year RTA has provided such service. To communicate the FY19 service plan proposed changes and to gather input from transit users as well as the broader public, 10 community meetings were held in advance of the public hearing at the RTA Board of Directors Meeting on May 24, 2018. In mid -March RTA issued a booklet summarizing the proposed changes (English and Spanish). The booklet was available to the public on all fixed -route buses as well as on line at RTA's web site. Customers were invited to comment on the proposals by phone, email, traditional mail or by attending any of the 10 community meetings conducted by RTA staff during the last week of March. Additionally, staff provided briefings to five T-NOW chapters. A total of 53 comments on the FY19 service plan were received from 31 people. The comments focused on support for proposed improvements (11), concern regarding proposed service discontinuations (27), or other requests for service (15) that are beyond the scope of the FY19 service plan and may be considered in future years. Following a review of these comments and the most recent ridership data, the proposed service plan was modified to retain eight weekdays and three weekend trips originally proposed for deletion where ridership had recently improved. To maintain the system efficiency and effectiveness, staff recommends implementing the plan as modified following the public outreach efforts. January 2019 will also see the opening of the improved passenger amenities and enhanced bus stop area at the Temecula Promenade Mall, allowing routes 23, 24, and 61 to serve this facility 34 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 Riverside Tra H Agency in addition to routes 55, 79, and CommuterLink routes 202, 205, 206, 208, and 217 which already serve the mall. Development work continues for new mobility hubs at Hemet and UCR (see Pages 26-28 for more details). 3.3 MODIFICATIONS TO PARA TRANSIT SERVICE The provision of ADA services remains a challenge; it is costly both to RTA and to the passengers who use it. Efforts to mitigate the increasing expenses in DAR service included the launch of a senior and disabled Travel Training Program and the establishment of a Medi-Cal Reimbursement Program. The Freedom to Go Travel Training Program commenced in fall 2011 and covers all aspects of public transit from training on how to ride the bus, how to use a bus schedule and map, as well as help in overcoming physical and social barriers that may prevent passengers from using a fixed -route bus. Participants benefit by developing a greater level of independence and increased mobility, ultimately bringing significant financial savings to both customers and RTA. In FY17, more than 400 trainees actively participated in travel training. Program participants took nearly 96,000 trips on fixed -route buses. As of April 2018, more than 400 trainees actively participated in the program and have taken over 75,500 trips on fixed -route buses. Since the program's inception, travel training has served more than 1,900 seniors and persons with disabilities, resulting in more than 455,000 trips on fixed -route buses through April 2018. RTA can save an estimated $8,600 a year for every five -day -a -week rider who makes the switch from DAR to fixed -route service. During FY17, the program saved RTA over $500,000 and since the program's inception it has saved over $1.5 million. The Medi-Cal Reimbursement Program was implemented in early 2012 and was developed in cooperation with the State Medi-Cal Program for paratransit trips taken to and from qualifying medical facilities. This program provides reimbursement of 50 percent of the net expenses associated with these trips and provides access to alternative sources of state and federal funding for DAR services. Eligible expense reimbursement so far under this program is $4.4 million. 3.4 MARKETING PLANS AND PROMOTION A marketing and communications plan is developed to support the annual goals of RTA, while advancing the mission and vision of the organization. The plan seeks to address the following focus areas: • Increasing ridership • Increasing awareness of RTA services 35 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 �' `p= H ipnry • Enhancing the image of RTA • Educating the public on the benefits of public transportation • Travel Training and ADA certification • Providing excellent customer service • Coordinating media and public relations • Enhancing government relations • Assisting with employee communications Addressing these areas is accomplished by executing marketing and communication programs or campaigns targeted at existing and potential riders, commuters, the general public, elected officials, students, the business community, the media, non-profit organizations, and employees. These programs and campaigns employ a mix of different media to reach the desired audiences. Marketing efforts aim to build on the existing base of awareness by educating the general public about what transit services are available and how and where to get more information. Service Adjustments: Marketing promotes information regarding service adjustments through a variety of advertising methods to reach customers including rider alerts, press releases, website information, and brochures distributed throughout the service area, newspaper ads, on -bus information, and social media. Customer Information Materials: RTA aims to make the transit system easier to understand and use through enhanced passenger information and signage. Materials are developed for both novice riders and experienced users to read and understand. Informational documents are readily available and designed to attractively promote RTA services to new users, while maintaining interest and engagement from existing riders. Public Speaking Opportunities: Presentations are customized for a variety of market segments. Outreach to business and community leaders is used to educate these groups about the economic benefits that transit provides to the RTA community, while presentations for social service agencies or other gatekeeper organizations are tailored to educate these groups on how transit can enhance personal mobility and how they can help to promote its usage. Presentations also occur at senior centers, colleges, and school orientation programs that focus on how those populations can use the bus to accomplish their various tasks. Community Relations: Many of RTA's strategies rely on working through local organizations and businesses to direct specific promotional messages to constituencies with realistic potential for using RTA's transit services. Community -based marketing and partnerships with local businesses and public agencies of this kind are cost-effective. One way RTA builds upon these relationships is by participating in community events such as expos and parades, which provides the opportunity to attract potential new users and also promote RTA as an active 36 = > . Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21—R+­side Tra nail Agency community partner. In FY18, to strengthen these efforts, RTA hired a full-time Community Engagement Coordinator. Website and Social Media: RTA's website is used to publish up-to-date information about Agency services, policies, and publications. RTA also utilizes social media, including Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, and alerts. Social media is a relatively inexpensive advertising format that allows RTA to provide information quickly and easily to users while raising RTA's profile and brand. Customer Information Center: The Customer Information Center provides phone information to customers seven days a week. As call volumes fluctuate, RTA maintains staffing levels to adequately meet its customers' needs. Various resources such as Google Transit trip planners and BusWatch real-time bus tracking allow customer representatives to quickly and accurately answer customer inquiries. English and Spanish speaking clerks are always available to assist callers. For other language requirements, both written and verbal, RTA uses the service of Languagel-ine Solutions which provide interpretation and translation in more than 200 languages. Travel Training: The Freedom to Go Travel Training Program is for people with disabilities and older adults who want to learn to travel safely and independently using public transportation. Travel training is a free, self -paced process where an individual, regardless of ability or age, can learn to ride RTA's fixed -route system. Participants experience an increased sense of confidence and self-reliance as a result of learning to travel independently. Parents and care providers can benefit too. Providing a child or aging parent with the knowledge to use RTA buses provides independence, saves time, and lowers expenses. The community benefits too. With a newfound ability to travel with RTA, individuals will be able to visit family and friends, shop more often, and participate in recreational activities that enhance their quality of life. By transitioning from DAR to fixed -route bus service, both customers and RTA save money. Transportation NOW: T-NOW was formed in 1992 as a grassroots advocacy group comprised of public transit advocates. Members of T-NOW range from elected officials to community activists to everyday transit users who are committed not only to addressing regional transportation issues but meeting the needs of individual communities. There are six T-NOW chapters throughout the service area that include Greater Riverside, Hemet / San Jacinto Area, Northwest, Moreno Valley / Perris, San Gorgonio Pass Area, and Southwest. Each chapter meets monthly and sets goals and objectives relevant to their communities. 3.5 BUDGET IMPACT ON PROPOSED CHANGES The Agency's FY19 budget reflects a strategy to grow current levels of safe, reliable, and effective fixed -route services by over three percent when compared to FY18 while considering the continued economic and systemic pressures that demand efficiency to the greatest extent 37 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 �' `p= H ipnry possible. To that end, the Agency is planning for a service level that balances forecasted fiscal constraints with the varied profile of the service area as well as delivering services aimed at preserving and growing ridership through exploiting existing and identifying emerging markets. Staff remains fully committed to exploring all service and financial alternatives necessary to meeting the public transit needs of the citizens who live and work in Western Riverside County. Public transportation helps alleviate congestion, ensures mobility, promotes more livable communities, and assists with meeting additional needs that arise as a result of the ADA. Planned service changes in FY19 and beyond are contingent upon economic conditions and available revenue. Therefore, should funding be unavailable for planned services and projects, the implementation and service improvements in conjunction with them will be delayed until sufficient revenue is available. In order to make the improvements more sustainable, RTA has also proposed rationalizing its lowest ridership trips network wide, resulting in the elimination of a small number of trips across all routes, and the elimination of Route 212 in its entirety. This approach will minimize the overall inconvenience to RTA riders while making available a large number of service improvements and avoiding the need for a fare increase in FY19. Any new service will also adhere to RTA's Sustainable Funding Source Policy that was approved in September 2010. The enactment of the policy provides a framework that assures that funding sources, particularly temporary financial assistance or seed money, are utilized only on service that has a significant potential to be productive and financially sustainable when initial funding expires or is depleted. This encourages the use of new or expanded service to demonstrate that it is warranted by meeting productivity standards over an established period of time. 38 -r Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 �- `p=-;, ipnry CHAPTER 4: FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS RTA's FY19 budget reflects a strategy to fit within current financial constraints. The year will feature four key service modifications over the FY18 service offering. First, in September 2018, Route 22 will be split at the Perris Transit Center thereby creating new Route 9. Second, in January 2019, Route 27 will be split at the Perris Transit Center thereby creating new Route 28. Third, CommuterLink Route 200 service will experience two additional weekday trips. Fourth, Saturday and / or Sunday service will be added to a number of routes. In addition, a reallocation of weekend bus service hours will see all RTA local bus routes offer 7-day service for the first time in RTA's history. To make the above improvements sustainable, RTA has proposed to eliminate poor performing trips network -wide as well as the elimination of Route 212. As always, service adjustments to all routes may be made to maintain or improve on -time performance and connections within the system throughout the fiscal year. 4.1 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET The total budget for FY19 is $123,759,860, with $87,666,909 projected for operating expenses and $36,092,951 projected for capital projects. As currently budgeted, total operating expenses for FY19 are $87,666,909, an increase of $6,068,079 or seven percent over the FY18 budget. It should be noted that RTA is planning for an increase of over 3 percent in fixed -route revenue service hours. Significant cost drivers are new service, purchased transportation costs including fuel, and strategic staffing adjustments. The FY19 capital budget represents an increase of $29,058,783 or 413 percent over FY18 mid- year budget levels. The significant increase in the capital budget request is attributable to increased vehicle requirements, programming of new Senate Bill 1 (SB1) State of Good Repair (SGR) funds, and a reservation of funds for the new Central Operations and Maintenance Facility as well as replacement of the heavy-duty CNG fleet. W, Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 Ri a ,Ide Tra H Agency Operating Budget Profile: $17,664,236 $1,273,4: $11,055,964 ------------------- $57,673,294 ❑ Operations ■ Maintenance ❑ Planning ■ Administration The proposed operating budget totals $87,666,909. At 66 percent, Operations constitutes the largest component of the proposed budget while Maintenance makes up 13 percent of the total. Thus, combined Operations and Maintenance equate to 79 percent of the budget. Planning and Administration combined make up the remaining 21 percent of the budget. The operating budget contains five major cost elements. The elements are: • Salaries and benefits (49 percent), which are made up of wages and fringe benefits including medical, pension, worker's compensation, and other post -employment benefits (OPEB) expenses. • Purchased transportation (36 percent), which represents the resources required for contracted transportation services for DAR / taxi overflow and certain fixed -route services. • Materials and supplies (5 percent), made up primarily of parts, fuel, lubricants, and supplies for the operation, repair, and maintenance of Agency vehicles and facilities. • Services (4 percent) include but are not limited to external auditing, legal, marketing, outside maintenance and custodial services, armored transport, actuarial services, legislative consulting, and towing. • Other expenses (6 percent) include but are not limited to insurance, utilities, printing and publications, advertising and promotion, dues and subscriptions, and other miscellaneous expenses. 40 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 $5,372,362 $31, $3,466,928 Capital Budget Profile: $43,099,527 ❑Salaries & Benefits ■ Services ❑ Materials & Supplies ■ Purchased Transportation ■ Other Expenses The proposed FY19 capital budget totals $36,092,951. Capital funding will be used for the purchase of critical items to maintain existing operations and service levels, while positioning the agency for the future. The capital budget is a component of the comprehensive five-year Capital Improvement Plan including equipment and upgrade of Agency infrastructure. FY19 capital budget profile by project element is shown below: 5200.000 C1 W7 F71 $12 $266,72., 3,958 ❑ Maintenance ■ Revenue Vehicles ■Support Vehicles ■ Facilities M Shelters & Stops Notable capital projects included in the proposed FY19 budget include: • Revenue vehicles replacement (14 heavy-duty CNG, 33 mid -sized fixed -route, 29 DAR) • Non -revenue vehicles (8 cars, 1 truck) • Tire lease • IT, Vehicle, and Facilities maintenance and support equipment • Improvements for bus stops, transfer points, and transit facilities 41 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 =R-r Ri—side Tra H Agp-� 4.2 FUNDING SOURCES FOR OPERATING AND CAPITAL PROGRAMS Funding for the operating and capital budgets are generated from state, federal, and local revenue sources. The chart shown below summarizes the allocation of each revenue source. Total Operating and Capital Revenues $123,759,860 Operating Revenues Capital Revenues $87,666,909 $36,092,951 Passenger Fares Federal $10,802,010 $11,902,933 LTF Operating Assistance FTA § 5307 $46,997,836 $11,577,384 Federal Operating Assistance FTA § 5339 $20,353,313 $325,549 FTA § 5307 STA $18,215,072 $22,333,923 FTA § 5310 S61 SGR $408,773 $1,856,095 FTA § 5311 $568,468 FTA CMAQ $1,161, 000 (LCTOP) $1,474,453 Measure A $5,633,457 TUMF Other Local Revenue 52,405.840 42 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 Ri—,Ide Tra H Agency 4.3 TUMF PROGRAM The WRCOG TUMF Program ensures that a new development pays its fair share for the increased traffic that it creates. As identified in the WRCOG TUMF Administrative Plan, RTA is currently allocated three percent of every TUMF dollar collected for use on projects of regional significance located in the TUMF network. Below is the comprehensive list of RTA's projects included in the 2016 TUMF Nexus Study: # OF PROJECTO.� UNITS SHARECOST TUMF Riverside Mobility Hub at Transit Center 1 $6,000,000 1 $6,000,000 $3,630,000 Vine Street Moreno Valley Mobility Transit Center 2 $9,000,000 1 $9,000,000 $5,445,000 Hub(s) Jurupa Valley Mobility Transit Center 2 $9,000,000 1 $9,000,000 $5,445,000 Hub(s) Banning Mobility Hub(s) Transit Center 2 $9,000,000 1 $9,000,000 $5,445,000 Lake Elsinore / Canyon Lake Transit Center 2 $9,000,000 1 $9,000,000 $5,445,000 Mobility Hub(s) Transit Enhancements in Transit Center 2 $9,000,000 1 $9,000,000 $5,445,000 Temecula / Murrieta Hemet Mobility Hub Transit Center 2 $9,000,000 1 $9,000,000 $5,445,000 San Jacinto Mobility Hub Transit Center 2 $9,000,000 1 $9,000,000 $5,445,000 MSJC Mobility Hub Transfer Facility $1,000,000 1 $1,000,000 $605,000 Regional Operations and 0 and M Facility $50,000,000 1 $50,000,000 $30,251,000 Maintenance Facility Annual Transit Bus Stop $40,000 290 $11,600,000 $7,018,000 Enhancements Program Central Corridor Rapid Link BRT Service Capital $60,000 42 $2,520,000 $1,525,000 Implementation Vehicle Fleet Medium Buses Vehicle Fleet 1 $155,000 7 $1,085,000 $656,000 Vehicle Fleet Large Buses Vehicle Fleet 2 $585,000 29 $16,965,000 $10,264,000 COA Study COA Study $950,000 1 $950,000 $575,000 • $153,120,000 $92,639,000 Source: TUMF Nexus Study — 2016 Program Update, Page 51. The Nexus Study is a planning document, and programming of TUMF funds is subject to funding availability and done through the TUMF Project Expenditure Plan. Table 10 contains RTA's FY19 — FY23 TUMF Expenditure Plan effective July 1, 2018. 43 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 =1gy Ri—side T•a H AgpR� 4.4 REGULATORYAND COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS As a recipient of state and federal funding, RTA is required to comply with regulatory policies and procedures that are reviewed and audited regularly. SUMMARY OF ••Y AND COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS TDA Triennial Audit: Under the State of California, TDA provides two major sources of funding for public transportation: LTF and STA funds. These funds are for the development and support of public transportation needs that exist in California and are allocated to areas of each county based on population, taxable sales, and transit performance. The last TDA Triennial Audit was completed in January 2014. See Table 6 for a summary of the recommendations and actions taken. FTA Triennial Review: The triennial review is a comprehensive review of compliance with FTA requirements that is conducted of § 5307 grantees at least every three years. Even though the review is conducted of § 5307 grantees, it addresses all FTA programs for which the grantee is the direct recipient of funds, including § 5304, 5307, 5310, 5311, and 5339. It addresses the grantee's implementation of Federal requirements in 24 areas and its oversight of sub -recipients, operations contractors, or lessees funded by these programs. The last FTA Triennial Review was completed in April2016 with three findings. RTA addressed and closed out all three findings in May 2016. ADA: The federal ADA Act of 1990 prohibits discrimination and ensures equal opportunity and access for persons with disabilities. Under the ADA Act, public transit operators are required to provide complementary paratransit service to persons who are ADA certified and are within three-quarters of a mile of a local fixed -route bus during the hours of bus service operation. RTA remains fully compliant with all Federal ADA regulations and has had no ADA customers denied service on DAR. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program: The federal DBE Program seeks to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of FTA's Department of Transportation -assisted contracts in the Department's highway, transit, and airport financial assistance programs and to create a level playing field on which DBEs can compete fairly for Department of Transportation -assisted contracts. RTA's current DBE Program will remain in effect through September of 2018. In accordance with U.S. Department of Transportation regulations found at 49 C.F.R. § 26.45, a new 3-year DBE goal will be submitted for review by the FTA on August 1, 2018 to become effective upon October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2021. 44 Short Range Transit Plan • FY19 — FY21 =K-T Ri—side T—ij AgpR� Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO): The Federal Transit Laws, 49 U.S.C. § 5332 (b), provide that "no person in the United States shall on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or age be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any project, program or activity funded in whole or in part through financial assistance under this Act." This applies to employment and business opportunities and is considered to be in addition to the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEO Program is submitted to FTA every four years and RTA is in compliance. The last submission was March 2, 2018. Drug and Alcohol Testing: Per the Code of Federal Regulations (Title 49, Part 40 and 655), RTA established a Drug and Alcohol testing policy in an effort to deter drug and alcohol use in the workplace. The policy establishes the circumstances in which applicants and employees are tested for drugs and alcohol in the workplace and the consequences when they test positive. The purpose of the policy is to prevent accidents, injuries, and fatalities resulting from the misuse of alcohol and prohibited drugs by employees who perform safety -sensitive functions. The Drug and Alcohol Report is in compliance with FTA and was last updated in January 1, 2018. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides that "no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance." (42 U.S.C. § 2000d). RTA submits Title VI Program to FTA every three years. The last report was submitted in October 2016. Limited English Proficiency (LEP): FTA issued regulations based on the Executive Order 13166 to all transit operators to establish LEP policies and procedures that ensures that RTA publications are issued in English and any other languages used by a significant number of the general population in the service area as determined by periodic demographic assessments. RTA's updated LEP policy and plan was submitted with the Title VI Program in October 2016. Public Hearing Policy: U.S. Code Title 49 § 5307 under the Urbanized Area Formula Grant Program requires that transit systems maintain a process to solicit and consider public comments before raising fares or implementing major reductions in service. RTA's Public Hearing Policy for Major Service and Fare Changes was last revised in October 2012. Alternative Fueled Vehicles: RCTC Resolution No. 00-018 established an emissions standards requirement for the acquisition of urban transit buses with federal, state, or local funds. All full-sized urban public transit buses purchased or leased with federal, state, or local funds granted or programmed by RCTC shall meet the urban bus optional, reduced -emissions standards set by the California Air Resources Board for oxides of nitrogen and non -methane hydrocarbons. RTA remains fully compliant with RCTC Resolution No. 00-0018 for vehicles purchased using federal, state, or local funds. 45 Riverside Transit Agency FY 2018/19 - FY 2020/21 Short Range Transit Plan Summary Comparative Statistics: FY2018 Budget vs. Proposed FY2019 SRTP Unlinked Passengers Revenue Hours Revenue Miles Fare Revenue Operating Expenses FY2018 FY2019 FY2018 FY2019 FY2018 FY2019 FY2018 FY2019 FY2018 FY2019 Direct Operated Routes 1 1,700,988 1,921,643 77,248 77,437 880,094 868,915 $ 1,487,169 $ 1,552,850 $ 8,252,813 $ 8,267,649 1 RL 192,010 147,001 16,824 16,750 208,507 240,386 $ 171,429 $ 106,000 $ 1,798,739 $ 1,788,375 3 141,674 144,194 16,586 12,296 204,455 156,133 $ 107,134 $ 110,222 $ 1,771,316 $ 1,312,759 10 180,947 162,376 14,086 13,893 160,907 157,779 $ 158,383 $ 146,398 $ 1,504,964 $ 1,483,351 11 135,816 118,045 10,461 10,495 118,309 115,787 $ 123,823 $ 108,743 $ 1,117,720 $ 1,120,525 12 237,078 219,779 15,937 15,887 187,941 186,850 $ 201,895 $ 191,691 $ 1,703,011 $ 1,696,237 13 244,508 220,292 16,614 16,169 194,620 186,569 $ 200,056 $ 184,769 $ 1,775,160 $ 1,726,353 14 210,128 207,365 14,429 14,179 187,469 184,963 $ 182,349 $ 180,864 $ 1,541,760 $ 1,513,871 15 502,749 472,093 31,241 30,749 354,256 341,585 $ 435,732 $ 401,013 $ 3,337,792 $ 3,282,951 16 595,781 449,937 28,271 27,977 340,032 362,495 $ 509,214 $ 378,964 $ 3,020,376 $ 2,987,007 18 147,631 130,778 11,422 10,710 144,760 135,209 $ 123,198 $ 111,501 $ 1,220,582 $ 1,143,508 19 815,354 722,491 39,909 50,247 503,987 614,178 $ 754,447 $ 628,800 $ 4,245,189 $ 5,364,653 20 303,822 306,326 27,245 24,020 404,800 366,138 $ 264,538 $ 270,182 $ 2,910,657 $ 2,564,507 21 108,348 117,420 10,557 10,088 144,631 132,138 $ 103,657 $ 113,921 $ 1,128,084 $ 1,077,093 22 335,242 287,781 25,904 20,695 447,967 332,911 $ 313,854 $ 276,385 $ 2,767,811 $ 2,209,498 27 492,396 370,316 38,395 29,202 744,158 558,608 $ 487,078 $ 368,797 $ 4,102,258 $ 3,117,809 28 178,191 12,554 223,829 $ - $ 179,866 $ 1,340,364 29 144,779 133,888 10,611 15,835 141,365 196,356 $ 131,170 $ 120,962 $ 1,133,802 $ 1,690,696 41D 47,802 46,760 3,848 2,678 59,823 41,892 $ 39,026 $ 40,784 $ 410,956 $ 285,927 49 219,652 227,122 10,927 15,654 127,531 165,900 $ 199,883 $ 213,676 $ 1,165,708 $ 1,671,338 54F 7,033 10,828 280 455 1,400 2,275 $ 42,232 $ 74,757 $ 30,790 $ 48,579 200 136,584 155,068 11,382 27,335 276,381 649,096 $ 128,448 $ 325,000 $ 1,191,588 $ 2,918,461 202D 1,322 3,574 247 594 5,648 6,047 $ 1,861 $ 3,767 $ 25,776 $ 63,390 204 42,786 42,999 6,308 6,367 1 133,479 133,852 $ 78,067 $ 77,536 $ 673,625 $ 679,774 205 20,320 4,517 107,404 $ - $ 40,381 $ - $ 482,260 206 53,179 36,830 6,947 5,046 170,230 124,070 $ 140,212 $ 97,452 $ 741,891 $ 538,704 208D 16,884 13,337 2,697 1,678 68,539 39,858 $ 23,163 $ 19,344 $ 287,985 $ 179,110 210D 3,690 2,339 605 389 7,620 4,405 $ 9,353 $ 6,579 $ 64,559 $ 41,566 216 45,799 4,796 109,604 - $ 98,939 $ - $ 521,268 $ 217D 7,919 7,744 1,135 1,156 29,790 29,790 $ 17,041 $ 16,468 $ 121,162 $ 123,390 Total Directly Operated Routes 7,071,899 6,876,837 454,912 475,052 6,358,302 6,665,418 $ 6,533,349 $ 6,347,672 $ 48,567,343 $ 50,719,705 % Change - FY19 vs. FY18 -2.76 % 4.43% 4.83% 1 -2.8% Contracted Fixed Routes 3 10,257 9,360 2,781 1,667 37,789 22,334 $ 11,468 $ 9,540 $ 236,518 $ 149,448 8 208,908 213,108 20,791 19,747 293,241 279,730 $ 206,589 $ 210,200 $ 1,768,584 $ 1,770,475 9 66,669 5,164 113,325 $ 66,949 $ 463,022 19C 5,946 6,604 1,147 508 13,722 5,047 $ 4,869 $ 5,242 $ 97,517 $ 45,570 23 87,793 94,084 15,638 14,221 234,973 207,819 $ 83,140 $ 94,046 $ 1,330,223 $ 1,274,976 24 62,703 64,456 9,544 11,061 134,944 149,318 $ 65,443 $ 64,430 $ 811,907 $ 991,697 26 20,208 24,250 7,945 7,946 105,527 106,771 $ 462,397 $ 360,000 $ 675,873 $ 712,401 30 51,219 62,671 9,286 8,228 115,588 102,353 $ 51,767 $ 59,575 $ 789,948 $ 737,720 31 144,145 146,401 18,603 19,496 371,184 390,288 $ 148,700 $ 146,516 $ 1,582,493 $ 1,747,963 32 125,491 120,022 10,895 10,162 117,258 106,755 $ 116,130 $ 119,974 $ 926,800 $ 911,077 33 38,909 54,406 5,227 6,047 63,153 72,214 $ 33,566 $ 50,652 $ 444,676 $ 542,129 40 18,943 29,688 3,614 6,217 62,991 112,286 $ 19,392 $ 29,331 $ 307,470 $ 557,372 41C 31,054 27,537 5,948 5,432 104,876 90,492 $ 26,806 $ 24,018 $ 505,953 $ 487,051 42 56,290 53,182 5,376 5,759 80,544 85,278 $ 49,327 $ 45,991 $ 457,360 $ 516,362 50 2,375 2,767 2,352 2,340 15,138 15,062 $ 197,606 $ 202,499 $ 200,100 $ 209,767 51 29,973 32,397 1,845 1,790 1 19,652 19,070 $ 148,383 $ 153,072 $ 157,322 $ 160,513 52 41,255 42,245 3,683 3,742 27,333 23,762 $ 240,437 $ 642,000 $ 313,304 $ 335,515 54 1,451 2,570 1,392 1,367 6,864 6,864 $ 88,931 $ 85,000 $ 118,408 $ 122,592 55 17,954 19,329 1,144 1,196 15,597 15,372 $ 19,455 $ 20,332 $ 97,427 $ 107,213 61 68,778 124,142 16,391 19,695 273,328 332,214 $ 73,633 $ 124,475 $ 1,394,336 $ 1,765,758 74 177,760 200,365 21,953 21,619 376,710 372,783 $ 183,981 $ 200,957 $ 1,867,452 $ 1,938,275 79 99,353 108,211 13,573 14,261 236,544 240,865 $ 98,072 $ 108,168 $ 1,154,611 $ 1,278,546 202 13,945 13,741 5,862 4,453 148,453 123,637 $ 28,465 $ 25,451 $ 498,322 $ 399,256 208 15,068 14,699 7,145 6,209 170,435 146,265 $ 31,940 $ 31,259 $ 607,811 $ 556,681 210 2,385 2,885 706 707 14,085 14,103 $ 5,969 $ 6,983 $ 60,068 $ 63,384 212 26,683 6,585 7,800 3,254 189,299 75,238 $ 53,120 $ 11,874 $ 663,557 $ 291,713 217 25,488 32,979 6,548 6,723 194,723 192,581 $ 54,216 $ 64,224 $ 557,034 $ 602,713 Total Contracted Fixed Routes 1,384,334 1,575,353 207,190 209,011 3,423,950 3,421,826 $ 2,503,802 $ 2,962,758 $ 17,625,073 $ 18,739,189 Change - FY19 vs. FY18 13.80 % 0.88% -0.06 % 18.3%1 6.3 % TOTAL FIXED ROUTES 1 8,456,233 8,452,190 662,102 684,063 9,782,252 10,087,244 $ 9,037,151 $ 9,310,430 $ 66,192,416 $ 69,458,894 % Chang e-FY19vs. FY18 -0.05% 3.32% 3.12% 3.0% 4.9% 1:50 PM 5/16/2018 Riverside Transit Agency FY 2018/19 - FY 2020/21 Short Range Transit Plan Summary Comparative Statistics: FY2O18 Budget vs. Proposed FY2O19 SUP Unlinked Passengers Revenue Hours Revenue Miles Fare Revenue Operating Expenses FY2018 FY2019 FY2018 FY2019 FY2018 FY2019 1 FY2018 FY2019 FY2018 FY2019 Dial -a -ride Routes Riv-San UZA 262,671 261,183 130,459 126,489 2,174,755 2,134,861 $ 959,794 $ 918,013 $ 9,353,854 $ 11,074,739 Murr-Tem-Men UZA 73,980 78,146 40,806 39,816 690,652 683,502 $ 270,320 $ 276,465 $ 2,925,791 $ 3,486,072 Hemet UZA 68,233 67,555 30,148 29,184 457,925 448,777 $ 249,321 $ 238,996 $ 2,161,620 $ 2,555,172 Non-UZA 6,166 2,045 4,110 3,990 67,823 67,017 $ 22,530 $ 7,235 $ 294,720 $ 349,306 Total Dial -a -ride Routes 411,049 408,929 205,524 199,479 3,391,154 3,334,157 $ 1,501,966 1,440,709 $ 14,735,984 17,465,289 % Change - FY19 vs. FY18 -0.52% -2.94% -1.68% -4.1 % 18.5% Taxi Program Riv-San UZA 6,699 7,860 3,903 4,383 125,879 125,681 $ 26,671 $ 31,432 $ 410,652 $ 456,252 Murr-Tem-Men UZA 2,460 3,093 1,118 1,319 32,107 33,571 $ 9,781 $ 12,283 $ 105,420 $ 123,656 Hemet UZA 1,593 1,646 1,318 1,351 43,306 41,021 $ 6,359 $ 6,708 $ 140,950 $ 147,934 Non-UZA 169 114 129 144 4,108 4,087 $ 673 $ 448 $ 13,408 $ 14,884 Total Taxi Routes 10,920 12,713 6,468 7,197 205,400 204,360 $ 43,483 50,871 $ 670,430 742,726 % Change - FY18 vs. FY17 16.42% 11.27% -0.51 % 17.0% 10.8% TOTAL DAR and TAXI SERVICE 421,969 421,6421 211,9921 206,6761 3,596,5541 3,538,517 $ 1,545,449 $ 1,491,580 $ 15,406,414 $ 18,208,015 % Change -FY19vs.FY18 1 -0.08% -2.51% -1.61% -3.5% 18.2% GRAND TOTAL 8,878,202 8,873,832 1 874,095 1 890,739 1 13,378,806 13,625,761 $ 10,582,601 $ 10,802,010 $ 81,598,830 $ 87,666,909 Chan e - FY19 vs. FY18 -0.05%1 1.90%1 1.85%1 2.1%1 7.4 1:50 PM 5/16/2018 IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Bus (Motorbus) / Directly Operated Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FY 2018119 Short Range Transit Plan Riverside Transit Agency Average Lifetime # of Life to Date Miles Per Active Active # of Life to Date Vehicle Miles Vehicle As Of Lift and Fuel Vehicles Contingency Vehicle Miles through Year -To -Date Year Mfg. Model Seating Ramp Vehicle Type FY 2017/ Vehicles Prior Year End March (e.g., March) Built Code Code Capacity Equipped Length Code 18 FY 2017/18 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 2013 GIL G27D102N4 38 81 42 CN 81 17,436,387 21,025,110 259,569 2014 GIL G27D102N4 38 9 42 CN 9 1,265,906 1,654,467 183,829 2016 GIL G27D102N4 38 30 42 CN 30 990,444 1,756,400 58,546 2002 NAB 40LFW15 40 0 40 CN 1,290,355 Totals: 154 120 120 19,692,737 25,726,332 214,386 TransTrack Manager— Page 1 of 4 4/16/2018 (w Table 1 - Fleet Inventory � FY 2018119 Short Range Transit Plan CNivdi f"l-oeprhyim{ammsim Riverside Transit Agency Bus (Motorbus) / Purchased Transportation Average Lifetime # of Life to Date Miles Per Active Active # of Life to Date Vehicle Miles Vehicle As Of Lift and Fuel Vehicles Contingency Vehicle Miles through Year -To -Date Year Mfg. Model Seating Ramp Vehicle Type FY 2017/ Vehicles Prior Year End March (e.g., March) Built Code Code Capacity Equipped Length Code 18 FY 2017/18 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 1994 CCI AH28 25 2 29 CN 2 813,028 1,090,518 545,259 1996 CCI AH28 25 1 29 CN 1 320,007 330,610 330,610 2009 EDN EnAeroElit 26 4 29 GA 4 4,090,363 2,444,111 2012 EDN EnAeroElit 28 10 33 CN 10 2,658,285 3,206,270 320,627 2013 EDN EnAeroElit 28 11 33 CN 11 2,225,912 2,776,552 252,413 2015 EDN EnAeroElit 26 1 33 CN 1 98,909 174,122 174,122 2016 EDN EnAeroElit 26 10 33 GA 10 668,930 1,282,337 128,233 2016 EDN EnAeroElit 26 25 33 GA 25 1,984,530 3,477,839 139,113 2011 SPC SN28PLO 21 13 28 GA 13 4,625,102 4,818,042 370,618 2008 SVM ClassAmSer 26 2 29 CN 2 550,366 583,922 291,961 2018 ZZZ Villager 28 5 32 CN 5 12,345 2,469 Totals: 285 84 80 4 18,035,432 20,196,668 252,458 TransTrack Manager— Page 2 of 4 4/16/2018 (w Table 1 - Fleet Inventory � FY 2018119 Short Range Transit Plan CNivdi f"l-oeprhyim{ammsim Riverside Transit Agency Commuter Bus / Directly Operated Average Lifetime # of Life to Date Miles Per Active Active # of Life to Date Vehicle Miles Vehicle As Of Lift and Fuel Vehicles Contingency Vehicle Miles through Year -To -Date Year Mfg. Model Seating Ramp Vehicle Type FY 2017/ Vehicles Prior Year End March (e.g., March) Built Code Code Capacity Equipped Length Code 18 FY 2017/18 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 2013 GIL G27D102N4 38 16 42 CN 16 2,734,211 3,352,854 209,553 2014 GIL G27D102N4 38 2 42 CN 2 203,252 273,488 136,744 2016 GIL G27D102N4 38 7 42 CN 7 57,921 208,766 29,823 Totals: 114 25 25 2,995,384 3,835,108 153,404 Trans Track Manager"" Page 3 of 4 4/16/2018 IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Demand Response / Purchased Transportation Table 1 - Fleet Inventory FY 2018119 Short Range Transit Plan Riverside Transit Agency Average Lifetime # of Life to Date Miles Per Active Active # of Life to Date Vehicle Miles Vehicle As Of Lift and Fuel Vehicles Contingency Vehicle Miles through Year -To -Date Year Mfg. Model Seating Ramp Vehicle Type FY 2017/ Vehicles Prior Year End March (e.g., March) Built Code Code Capacity Equipped Length Code 18 FY 2017/18 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 2008 EBC Aerotech 12 0 24 GA 1,152,032 1,705,294 2009 EBC Aerotech 12 6 24 GA 6 9,417,571 11,287,979 1,881,329 2016 EDN EnAerotech 12 36 23 GA 36 1,704,340 3,080,094 85,558 2013 GCC GCII 12 38 22 GA 38 7,591,259 8,604,987 226,447 2017 GLV Universal 12 30 24 GA 30 1,117,255 37,241 Totals: 60 110 110 19,865,202 25,795,609 234,506 TransTrack Manager— Page 4 of 4 4/16/2018 Mill (w IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Table 2 -- Riverside Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Audited Audited Plan 3rd Qtr Actual Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 203 190 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $63,610,231 $55,023,788 $81,598,830 $57,410,901 87,666,909 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $14,879,085 $11,535,605 $14,892,546 $12,306,493 $19,790,760 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $48,731,146 $43,488,183 $66,706,284 $45,104,408 $67,876,149 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 9,238,265 8,741,975 8,878,206 6,407,761 8,873,832 Passenger Miles 66,056,948 62,116,347 63,807,121 45,473,436 64,015,300 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 787,977.9 833,488.7 874,092.0 646,830.7 890,739.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 12,341,976.3 12,875,332.2 13,378,809.0 9,897,423.1 13,625,761.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 15,136,026.1 16,062,434.4 16,844,518.0 12,388,837.5 16,779,794.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $80.73 $66.02 $93.35 $88.76 $98.42 Farebox Recovery Ratio 23.39% 20.96% 18.25% 21.44% 22.57% Subsidy per Passenger $5.27 $4.97 $7.51 $7.04 $7.65 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.74 $0.70 $1.05 $0.99 $1.06 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $61.84 $52.18 $76.31 $69.73 $76.20 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $3.95 $3.38 $4.99 $4.56 $4.98 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 11.7 10.5 10.2 9.9 10.0 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.75 0.68 0.66 0.65 0.65 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. Trans Track Manager"" Page 1 of I 4/26/2018 Mill (w IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Table 2 -- Riverside Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan Excluded Routes FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Audited Audited Plan 3rd Qtr Actual Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 25 67 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $5,338,423 $2,363,356 $3,887,310 $11,774,224 $21,764,829 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $692,896 $165,689 $1,670,609 $1,188,290 $3,402,770 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $4,645,527 $2,197,667 $2,216,701 $10,585,934 $18,362,059 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 585,786 177,165 265,166 380,980 2,191,540 Passenger Miles 4,989,908 1,820,849 4,507,916 4,097,238 21,246,146 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 77,624.6 38,927.5 42,324.0 163,049.5 210,606.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 1,386,978.9 702,054.8 845,778.0 2,659,067.9 3,579,479.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 1,861,687.1 991,905.6 1,206,028.0 3,373,947.6 4,380,288.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $68.77 $60.71 $91.85 $72.21 $103.34 Farebox Recovery Ratio 12.98% 7.01% 42.97% 10.09% 15.63% Subsidy per Passenger $7.93 $12.40 $8.36 $27.79 $8.38 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.93 $1.21 $0.49 $2.58 $0.86 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $59.85 $56.46 $52.37 $64.92 $87.19 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $3.35 $3.13 $2.62 $3.98 $5.13 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 7.5 4.6 6.3 2.3 10.4 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.42 0.25 0.31 0.14 0.61 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. Trans Track Manager"" Page 1 of I 4/26/2018 Mill (w IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Table 2 -- Riverside Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan Non -Excluded Routes FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Audited Audited Plan 3rd Qtr Actual Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 178 123 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $58,271,808 $52,660,432 $77,711,520 $45,636,677 $65,902,080 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $14,186,189 $11,369,916 $13,221,937 $11,118,203 $16,387,990 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $44,085,619 $41,290,516 $64,489,583 $34,518,474 $49,514,090 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 8,652,479 8,564,810 8,613,040 6,026,781 6,682,292 Passenger Miles 61,067,040 60,295,498 59,299,205 41,376,198 42,769,154 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 710,353.3 794,561.2 831,768.0 483,781.2 680,133.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 10,954,997.4 12,173,277.4 12,533,031.0 7,238,355.2 10,046,282.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 13,274,339.1 15,070,528.8 15,638,490.0 9,014,889.8 12,399,506.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $82.03 $66.28 $93.43 $94.33 $96.90 Farebox Recovery Ratio 24.34% 21.59% 17.01% 24.36% 24.86% Subsidy per Passenger $5.10 $4.82 $7.49 $5.73 $7.41 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.72 $0.68 $1.09 $0.83 $1.16 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $62.06 $51.97 $77.53 $71.35 $72.80 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.02 $3.39 $5.15 $4.77 $4.93 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 12.2 10.8 10.4 12.5 9.8 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.79 0.70 0.69 0.83 0.67 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. Trans Track Manager"" Page 1 of I 4/26/2018 Mill (w IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Table 2 -- RTA-BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Audited Audited Plan 3rd Qtr Actual Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 124 116 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $38,637,455 $33,011,502 $48,540,462 $34,414,778 $49,379,341 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $11,192,742 $8,615,070 $10,843,296 $9,041,308 $15,155,595 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $27,444,713 $24,396,432 $37,697,166 $25,373,470 $34,223,746 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 7,277,474 6,835,911 7,071,901 5,018,555 6,698,646 Passenger Miles 49,311,786 45,966,334 47,863,912 33,704,886 44,521,209 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 405,531.8 417,267.8 454,912.0 333,381.0 462,498.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 5,796,950.0 5,877,796.2 6,358,303.0 4,700,916.8 6,441,589.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 6,675,776.2 6,759,506.1 7,434,941.0 5,446,411.9 7,421,217.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $95.28 $79.11 $106.70 $103.23 $106.77 Farebox Recovery Ratio 28.97% 26.10% 22.33% 26.27% 30.69% Subsidy per Passenger $3.77 $3.57 $5.33 $5.06 $5.11 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.56 $0.53 $0.79 $0.75 $0.77 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $67.68 $58.47 $82.87 $76.11 $74.00 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $4.73 $4.15 $5.93 $5.40 $5.31 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 17.9 16.4 15.5 15.1 14.5 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 1.26 1.16 1.11 1.07 1.04 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. Trans Track Manager"" Page 1 of I 4/26/2018 Mill (w IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Table 2 -- RTA Bus (Contract) -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Audited Audited Plan 3rd Qtr Actual Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet 79 74 Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $12,701,748 $12,203,725 $17,616,410 $12,346,009 $20,079,553 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $1,959,235 $1,586,061 $2,503,802 $2,139,909 $3,143,585 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $10,742,513 $10,617,664 $15,112,608 $10,206,100 $16,935,968 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 1,534,671 1,479,687 1,384,334 1,078,519 1,753,544 Passenger Miles 11,499,625 10,901,312 10,677,797 7,943,993 14,224,600 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 187,377.6 205,842.0 207,189.0 153,964.0 221,565.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 3,186,129.0 3,470,583.5 3,423,951.0 2,575,744.0 3,645,655.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 4,324,157.0 4,832,766.5 4,897,411.0 3,628,502.0 4,919,837.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $67.79 $59.29 $85.03 $80.19 $90.63 Farebox Recovery Ratio 15.42% 13.00% 14.21% 17.33% 15.65% Subsidy per Passenger $7.00 $7.18 $10.92 $9.46 $9.66 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $0.93 $0.97 $1.42 $1.28 $1.19 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $57.33 $51.58 $72.94 $66.29 $76.44 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $3.37 $3.06 $4.41 $3.96 $4.65 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 8.2 7.2 6.7 7.0 7.9 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.48 0.43 0.40 0.42 0.48 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. Trans Track Manager"" Page 1 of I 4/26/2018 Mill (w IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Table 2 -- RTA-DAR -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Audited Audited Plan 3rd Qtr Actual Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $11,510,714 $9,285,361 $14,771,564 $10,160,868 $17,465,289 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $1,532,718 $1,152,520 $1,501,964 $1,084,679 $1,440,709 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $9,977,996 $8,132,841 $13,269,600 $9,076,189 $16,024,580 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 413,968 415,326 411,050 300,758 408,929 Passenger Miles 5,095,946 5,112,663 5,060,012 3,702,331 5,033,902 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 188,077.4 203,726.3 205,523.0 153,820.1 199,479.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 3,157,621.3 3,333,425.5 3,391,155.0 2,463,524.8 3,334,157.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 3,934,817.0 4,276,634.7 4,306,766.0 3,156,686.1 4,234,380.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $61.20 $45.58 $71.87 $66.06 $87.55 Farebox Recovery Ratio 13.32% 12.41% 10.16% 10.68% 8.24% Subsidy per Passenger $24.10 $19.58 $32.28 $30.18 $39.19 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $1.96 $1.59 $2.62 $2.45 $3.18 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $53.05 $39.92 $64.57 $59.01 $80.33 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $3.16 $2.44 $3.91 $3.68 $4.81 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. Trans Track Manager"" Page 1 of I 4/26/2018 Mill (w IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Table 2 -- RTA Taxi -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Audited Audited Plan 3rd Qtr Actual Plan Fleet Characteristics Peak -Hour Fleet Financial Data Total Operating Expenses $614,615 $413,867 $670,394 $489,246 $742,726 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $48,691 $31,954 $43,484 $40,597 $50,871 Net Operating Expenses (Subsidies) $565,924 $381,913 $626,910 $448,649 $691,855 Operating Characteristics Unlinked Passenger Trips 12,152 11,051 10,921 9,929 12,713 Passenger Miles 149,591 136,038 205,400 122,226 235,589 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours (a) 6,991.1 6,652.5 6,468.0 5,665.6 7,197.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles (b) 201,275.9 193,527.1 205,400.0 157,237.4 204,360.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 201,275.9 193,527.1 205,400.0 157,237.4 204,360.0 Performance Characteristics Operating Cost per Revenue Hour $87.91 $62.21 $103.65 $86.35 $103.20 Farebox Recovery Ratio 7.92% 7.72% 6.48% 8.30% 6.84% Subsidy per Passenger $46.57 $34.56 $57.40 $45.19 $54.42 Subsidy per Passenger Mile $3.78 $2.81 $3.05 $3.67 $2.94 Subsidy per Revenue Hour (a) $80.95 $57.41 $96.92 $79.19 $96.13 Subsidy per Revenue Mile (b) $2.81 $1.97 $3.05 $2.85 $3.39 Passenger per Revenue Hour (a) 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.8 Passenger per Revenue Mile (b) 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.06 (a) Train Hours for Rail Modes. (b) Car Miles for Rail Modes. Trans Track Manager"" Page 1 of I 4/26/2018 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2018/19 — FY 2020/21 Short Range Transit Plan Table 2A — Excluded Routes Route # Mode (FR/DR) Service Type Route Description Date of Exemption (DO/CO) Implementation End Date New route. RapidLink GoldLine limited -stop service serving June 30, 2020 101 FR DO UCR, downtown Riverside, Galleria at Tyler and Corona August 27, 2017 primarily via University Ave and Magnolia Ave. 9 FR CO New route. From the Lake Elsinore Outlet Mall to Perris September 9, 2018 June 30, 2021 Station Transit Center via Hwy 74. 19 FR DO From Moreno Valley Mall to the Perris Station Transit Center January 14, 2018 June 30, 2020 via Perris Blvd and Sunnymead Blvd. 22 FR DO From Perris Station Transit Center to Downtown Riverside via September 9, 2018 June 30, 2021 Hwy 74, Old Elsinore Rd, and Alessandro Blvd. New route. Local circulator serving Moreno Valley/March 26 FR CO Field Metrolink Station and Moreno Valley Mall via Van Buren July 1, 2016 June 30, 2019 Blvd, Trautwein Rd, Alessandro Blvd, Sycamore Canyon Blvd, and Eucalyptus Ave. 27 FR DO From Perris Station Transit Center to Galleria at Tyler in January 13, 2019 June 30, 2021 Riverside via Florida Ave, 215 Fwy, and Van Buren Blvd. 28 FR DO New route. From Florida Ave and Lincoln Ave in East Hemet January 13, 2019 June 30, 2021 to Perris Station Transit Center. 30 FR CO Perris local circulator serving the Perris Transit Center, July 1, 2016 June 30, 2019 Walmart, and central part of the community. Service from Hemet Valley Mall to Moreno Valley Mall via 31 FR CO Banning with stops at Mt San Jacinto Community College, Sun September 9, 2018 June 30, 2021 Lakes Village, Walmart on Moreno Beach Dr, Moreno Valley Senior Center, and Riverside University Medical Center. From Super-Walmart on Sanderson Ave and the Hemet Valley 33 FR CO Mall in western Hemet to Stanford St and Thornton Ave in September 9, 2018 June 30, 2021 east Hemet. From Walmart in Lake Elsinore to Cherry Hills Blvd in Menifee 40 FR CO with stops in Canyon Lake, Quail Valley, MSJC Menifee, and January 13, 2019 June 30, 2021 Hertiage Lake. 42 FR CO From the Hemet Valley Mall to Soboba Casino in San Jacinto September 9, 2018 June 30, 2021 via Kirby St, Cottonwood Ave, Santa Fe Ave, and East Main St. 52 FR CO New route. Local circulator serving Hunter Park Metrolink July 1, 2016 June 30, 2019 Station and UCR via Iowa Ave, Blaine St, and University Ave 54 FR CO New route. Local circulator serving the Riverside Downtown October 1, 2016 June 30, 2019 Metrolink Station and downtown Riverside. New route. Circulator operating during Riverside Festival of 54F FR DO Lights, serving Downtown Riverside Metrolink Station and November 1, 2016 June 30, 2019 downtown Riverside. From the Perris Station Transit Center to Cherry Hills Blvd and 61 FR CO Bradley Rd in Menifee to the Promenade Mall area in September 9, 2018 June 30, 2021 Temecula with stops at MSJC Menifee campus, Loma Linda University Medical Center - Murrieta, and County Center Dr. From San Jacinto and Hemet to Menifee and Perris, serving 74 FR CO MSJC San Jacinto campus, Hemet Valley Mall, Winchester, September 9, 2018 June 30, 2021 MSJC Menifee campus, and Perris Station Transit Center. From the Hemet Valley Mall to Old Town Temecula via 79 FR CO Winchester Rd (State Hwy 79). Also serves County Center Dr, September 9, 2018 June 30, 2021 Promenade Mall, and Temecula City Hall. New route. From San Bernardino Transit Center to ARTIC via 200 FR DO 91 and 55 Fwys with stops at Downtown Riverside and La January 14, 2018 June 30, 2020 Sierra Metrolink Stations, and Village at Orange. New route. From the Promenade Mall in Temecula to Village 205 FR DO at Orange via 15 and 91 Fwys with stops in Murrieta, the Lake January 29, 2018 June 30, 2020 Elsinore Outlet Center, Temescal Canyon, and Corona Transit Center. Serves the Promenade Mall in Temecula to the Riverside 208 FR CO/DO Downtown Metrolink Station and downtown area via 1-215 July 1, 2016 June 30, 2019 with stops in Murrieta, Menifee, Perris, and Moreno Valley. 212 FR CO/DO Serves Hemet and San Jacinto to Downtown Riverside with July 1, 2016 June 30, 2019 stops at Perris and UCR. Note: Excluded routes are new routes or new service extensions that are eligible for exemption from the farebox recovery requirements. limid[ fom 1prwim{mvmsim Data Elements Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2018/19 All Routes Route # Day Type Peak Vehicles Passengers Passenger Miles Revenue Hours Total Hours Revenue Miles Total Miles Operating Cost Passenger Revenue Net Subsidy RTA-0 All Days $8,988,750 ($8,988,750) RTA-1 All Days 16 1,921,643 10,807,700 77,437.0 81,280.0 868,915.0 992,029.0 $8,267,649 $1,551,889 $6,715,760 RTA-10 All Days 3 162,376 873,807 13,893.0 14,408.0 157,779.0 169,304.0 $1,483,351 $146,398 $1,336,953 RTA-101 All Days 12 147,001 480,657 16,750.0 19,743.0 240,386.0 318,836.0 $1,788,375 $106,000 $1,682,375 RTA-11 All Days 2 118,045 636,103 10,495.0 10,836.0 115,787.0 126,031.0 $1,120,525 $108,743 $1,011,782 RTA-12 All Days 3 219,779 1,182,716 15,887.0 16,516.0 186,850.0 204,165.0 $1,696,237 $191,691 $1,504,546 RTA-13 All Days 3 220,292 1,185,527 16,169.0 16,664.0 186,569.0 199,542.0 $1,726,353 $184,769 $1,541,584 RTA-14 All Days 3 207,365 1,116,746 14,179.0 14,802.0 184,963.0 200,421.0 $1,513,871 $180,864 $1,333,007 RTA-15 All Days 6 472,093 2,542,443 30,749.0 31,564.0 341,585.0 362,930.0 $3,282,951 $401,013 $2,881,938 RTA-16/16E All Days 6 449,937 2,423,435 27,977.0 28,757.0 362,495.0 386,773.0 $2,987,007 $378,964 $2,608,043 RTA-18 All Days 2 130,778 703,785 10,710.0 11,229.0 135,209.0 150,551.0 $1,143,508 $111,501 $1,032,007 RTA-19 All Days 11 722,491 3,890,786 50,247.0 53,460.0 614,178.0 726,317.0 $5,364,653 $628,800 $4,735,853 RTA-19C All Days 1 6,604 44,066 508.0 692.0 5,047.0 7,220.0 $45,570 $5,242 $40,328 RTA-20 All Days 6 306,326 1,649,882 24,020.0 25,539.0 366,138.0 409,690.0 $2,564,507 $270,182 $2,294,325 RTA-200 All Days 5 155,068 3,153,821 27,335.0 28,593.0 649,096.0 688,292.0 $2,918,461 $325,000 $2,593,461 RTA-202 All Days 2 13,741 325,532 4,453.0 6,192.0 123,637.0 192,459.0 $399,256 $25,451 $373,805 RTA-202D All Days 1 3,574 67,293 594.0 730.0 6,047.0 9,623.0 $63,390 $3,767 $59,623 RTA-204D All Days 3 42,999 809,664 6,367.0 6,706.0 133,852.0 138,835.0 $679,774 $77,536 $602,238 RTA-205 All Days 3 20,320 417,436 4,517.0 6,337.0 107,404.0 176,979.0 $482,260 $40,381 $441,879 RTA-206D All Days 5 36,830 693,511 5,046.0 7,878.0 124,070.0 223,153.0 $538,704 $97,452 $441,252 RTA-208 All Days 3 14,699 340,418 6,209.0 8,315.0 146,265.0 211,152.0 $556,681 $31,259 $525,422 RTA-208D All Days 2 13,337 251,140 1,678.0 2,554.0 39,858.0 64,153.0 $179,110 $19,344 $159,766 RTA-21 All Days 2 117,420 632,056 10,088.0 10,666.0 132,138.0 148,922.0 $1,077,093 $113,921 $963,172 RTA-210 All Days 1 2,885 66,830 707.0 1,384.0 14,103.0 37,522.0 $63,384 $6,983 $56,401 RTA-210D All Days 1 2,339 44,043 389.0 1,024.0 4,405.0 25,744.0 $41,566 $6,579 $34,987 RTA-212 All Days 4 6,585 152,508 3,254.0 4,653.0 75,238.0 111,936.0 $291,713 $11,874 $279,839 RTA-217 All Days 4 32,979 763,804 6,723.0 9,203.0 192,581.0 272,808.0 $602,713 $64,224 $538,489 RTA-217D All Days 1 7,744 145,808 1,156.0 1,304.0 29,790.0 32,770.0 $123,390 $16,468 $106,922 Trans Track Manager"" Page 1 of 6 4/26/2018 limid[ fom 1prwim{mvmsim Data Elements Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2018/19 All Routes Route # Day Type Peak Vehicles Passengers Passenger Miles Revenue Hours Total Hours Revenue Miles Total Miles Operating Cost Passenger Revenue Net Subsidy RTA-22 All Days 4 287,781 3,416,288 20,695.0 23,164.0 332,911.0 372,970.0 $2,209,498 $276,385 $1,933,113 RTA-23 All Days 5 94,084 645,795 14,221.0 18,097.0 207,819.0 332,889.0 $1,274,976 $94,046 $1,180,930 RTA-24 All Days 3 64,456 442,708 11,061.0 13,625.0 149,318.0 233,021.0 $991,697 $64,430 $927,267 RTA-26 All Days 2 24,250 169,508 7,946.0 9,326.0 106,771.0 136,489.0 $712,401 $360,000 $352,401 RTA-27 All Days 4 370,316 4,404,659 29,202.0 31,518.0 558,608.0 634,506.0 $3,117,809 $368,797 $2,749,012 RTA-28 All Days 4 178,191 2,119,459 12,554.0 13,582.0 223,829.0 247,288.0 $1,340,364 $179,866 $1,160,498 RTA-29 All Days 3 133,888 720,608 15,835.0 16,729.0 196,356.0 218,511.0 $1,690,696 $120,962 $1,569,734 RTA-3 All Days 2 9,360 59,167 1,667.0 2,251.0 22,334.0 40,053.0 $149,448 $9,540 $139,908 RTA-30 All Days 2 62,671 437,184 8,228.0 8,909.0 102,353.0 108,711.0 $737,720 $59,575 $678,145 RTA-31 All Days 4 146,401 1,014,102 19,496.0 23,798.0 390,288.0 504,678.0 $1,747,963 $146,516 $1,601,447 RTA-32 All Days 3 120,022 823,401 10,162.0 12,626.0 106,755.0 169,141.0 $911,077 $119,974 $791,103 RTA-33 All Days 2 54,406 380,294 6,047.0 7,124.0 72,214.0 97,446.0 $542,129 $50,652 $491,477 RTA-3D All Days 3 144,194 777,205 12,296.0 13,185.0 156,133.0 181,679.0 $1,312,759 $110,222 $1,202,537 RTA-40 All Days 2 29,688 207,519 6,217.0 6,996.0 112,286.0 131,863.0 $557,372 $29,331 $528,041 RTA-41C All Days 3 27,537 187,955 5,432.0 6,626.0 90,492.0 121,285.0 $487,051 $24,018 $463,033 RTA-41D All Days 2 46,760 252,036 2,678.0 3,631.0 41,892.0 72,464.0 $285,927 $40,784 $245,143 RTA-42 All Days 2 53,182 370,863 5,759.0 7,264.0 85,278.0 117,856.0 $516,362 $45,991 $470,371 RTA-49 All Days 3 227,122 1,222,239 15,654.0 16,349.0 165,900.0 183,492.0 $1,671,338 $213,676 $1,457,662 RTA-50 All Days 2 2,767 5,062 2,340.0 3,119.0 15,062.0 30,123.0 $209,767 $202,499 $7,268 RTA-51 All Days 1 32,397 59,287 1,790.0 2,206.0 19,070.0 28,697.0 $160,513 $154,037 $6,476 RTA-52 All Days 1 42,245 295,295 3,742.0 4,750.0 23,762.0 44,184.0 $335,515 $642,000 ($306,485) RTA-54 All Days 1 10,828 19,815 455.0 477.0 2,275.0 2,535.0 $48,579 $74,757 ($26,178) RTA-54C All Days 1 2,570 4,703 1,367.0 2,781.0 6,864.0 44,507.0 $122,592 $85,000 $37,592 RTA-55 All Days 2 19,329 35,373 1,196.0 2,358.0 15,372.0 53,010.0 $107,213 $20,328 $86,885 RTA-61 All Days 4 124,142 866,926 19,695.0 22,131.0 332,214.0 391,042.0 $1,765,758 $124,475 $1,641,283 RTA-74 All Days 4 200,365 1,398,993 21,619.0 24,839.0 372,783.0 444,497.0 $1,938,275 $200,957 $1,737,318 RTA-79 All Days 4 108,211 755,497 14,261.0 16,990.0 240,865.0 314,710.0 $1,278,546 $108,168 $1,170,378 RTA-8 All Days 5 213,108 1,460,912 19,747.0 23,077.0 279,730.0 358,833.0 $1,770,475 $210,200 $1,560,275 Trans Track Manager"" Page 2 of 6 4/26/2018 limid[ fom 1prwim{mvmsim Data Elements Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2018/19 All Routes Route # Day Type Peak Vehicles Passengers Passenger Miles Revenue Hours Total Hours Revenue Miles Total Miles Operating Cost Passenger Revenue Net Subsidy RTA-9 All Days 1 66,669 791,439 5,164.0 5,558.0 113,325.0 136,417.0 $463,022 $66,949 $396,073 RTA-HEMDAR All Days 67,555 831,600 29,184.0 36,042.0 448,777.0 569,947.0 $2,555,172 $238,996 $2,316,176 RTA-HemTax All Days 1,646 44,756 1,351.0 1,351.0 41,021.0 41,021.0 $147,934 $6,708 $141,226 RTA-MTMDAR All Days 78,146 961,975 39,816.0 49,172.0 683,502.0 868,048.0 $3,486,072 $276,465 $3,209,607 RTA-MTMTax All Days 3,093 40,373 1,319.0 1,319.0 33,571.0 33,571.0 $123,656 $12,283 $111,373 RTA-NonDAR All Days 2,045 25,169 3,990.0 4,927.0 67,017.0 85,112.0 $349,306 $7,235 $342,071 RTA-NonTax All Days 114 2,769 144.0 144.0 4,087.0 4,087.0 $14,884 $448 $14,436 RTA-RSBDAR All Days 261,183 3,215,158 126,489.0 156,214.0 2,134,861.0 2,711,273.0 $11,074,739 $918,013 $10,156,726 RTA-RSBTax All Days 7,860 147,691 4,383.0 4,383.0 125,681.0 125,681.0 $456,252 $31,432 $424,820 Service Provider Totals 190 8,873,832 64,015,300 890,739.0 1,017,667.0 13,625,761.0 16,779,794.0 $87,666,909 $19,790,760 $67,876,149 Trans Track Manager'" Page 3 of 6 4/26/2018 IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Performance Indicators Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2018/19 All Routes Route # Day Type Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile Cost Per Passenger Farebox Recovery Ratio Subsidy Per Passenger Subsidy Per Passenger Mile Subsidy Per Revenue Hour Subsidy Per Revenue Mile Passengers Per Hour Passengers Per Mile RTA-0 All Days RTA-1 All Days $106.77 $9.51 $4.30 18.77% $3.49 $0.62 $86.73 $7.73 24.8 2.21 RTA-10 All Days $106.77 $9.40 $9.14 9.86% $8.23 $1.53 $96.23 $8.47 11.7 1.03 RTA-101 All Days $106.77 $7.44 $12.17 5.92% $11.44 $3.50 $100.44 $7.00 8.8 0.61 RTA-11 All Days $106.77 $9.68 $9.49 9.70% $8.57 $1.59 $96.41 $8.74 11.2 1.02 RTA-12 All Days $106.77 $9.08 $7.72 11.30% $6.85 $1.27 $94.70 $8.05 13.8 1.18 RTA-13 All Days $106.77 $9.25 $7.84 10.70% $7.00 $1.30 $95.34 $8.26 13.6 1.18 RTA-14 All Days $106.77 $8.18 $7.30 11.94% $6.43 $1.19 $94.01 $7.21 14.6 1.12 RTA-15 All Days $106.77 $9.61 $6.95 12.21% $6.10 $1.13 $93.72 $8.44 15.4 1.38 RTA-16/16E All Days $106.77 $8.24 $6.64 12.68% $5.80 $1.08 $93.22 $7.19 16.1 1.24 RTA-18 All Days $106.77 $8.46 $8.74 9.75% $7.89 $1.47 $96.36 $7.63 12.2 0.97 RTA-19 All Days $106.77 $8.73 $7.43 11.72% $6.55 $1.22 $94.25 $7.71 14.4 1.18 RTA-19C All Days $89.70 $9.03 $6.90 11.50% $6.11 $0.92 $79.39 $7.99 13.0 1.31 RTA-20 All Days $106.77 $7.00 $8.37 10.53% $7.49 $1.39 $95.52 $6.27 12.8 0.84 RTA-200 All Days $106.77 $4.50 $18.82 11.13% $16.72 $0.82 $94.88 $4.00 5.7 0.24 RTA-202 All Days $89.66 $3.23 $29.06 6.37% $27.20 $1.15 $83.94 $3.02 3.1 0.11 RTA-202D All Days $106.72 $10.48 $17.74 5.94% $16.68 $0.89 $100.38 $9.86 6.0 0.59 RTA-204D All Days $106.77 $5.08 $15.81 11.40% $14.01 $0.74 $94.59 $4.50 6.8 0.32 RTA-205 All Days $106.77 $4.49 $23.73 8.37% $21.75 $1.06 $97.83 $4.11 4.5 0.19 RTA-206D All Days $106.76 $4.34 $14.63 18.09% $11.98 $0.64 $87.45 $3.56 7.3 0.30 RTA-208 All Days $89.66 $3.81 $37.87 5.61% $35.75 $1.54 $84.62 $3.59 2.4 0.10 RTA-208D All Days $106.74 $4.49 $13.43 10.80% $11.98 $0.64 $95.21 $4.01 7.9 0.33 RTA-21 All Days $106.77 $8.15 $9.17 10.57% $8.20 $1.52 $95.48 $7.29 11.6 0.89 RTA-210 All Days $89.65 $4.49 $21.97 11.01% $19.55 $0.84 $79.78 $4.00 4.1 0.20 RTA-210D All Days $106.85 $9.44 $17.77 15.82% $14.96 $0.79 $89.94 $7.94 6.0 0.53 RTA-212 All Days $89.65 $3.88 $44.30 4.07% $42.50 $1.83 $86.00 $3.72 2.0 0.09 RTA-217 All Days $89.65 $3.13 $18.28 10.65% $16.33 $0.71 $80.10 $2.80 4.9 0.17 RTA-217D All Days $106.74 $4.14 $15.93 13.34% $13.81 $0.73 $92.49 $3.59 6.7 0.26 Trans Track Manager"" Page 4 of 6 4/26/2018 IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Performance Indicators Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2018/19 All Routes Route # Day Type Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile Cost Per Passenger Farebox Recovery Ratio Subsidy Per Passenger Subsidy Per Passenger Mile Subsidy Per Revenue Hour Subsidy Per Revenue Mile Passengers Per Hour Passengers Per Mile RTA-22 All Days $106.76 $6.64 $7.68 12.50% $6.72 $0.57 $93.41 $5.81 13.9 0.86 RTA-23 All Days $89.65 $6.14 $13.55 7.37% $12.55 $1.83 $83.04 $5.68 6.6 0.45 RTA-24 All Days $89.66 $6.64 $15.39 6.49% $14.39 $2.09 $83.83 $6.21 5.8 0.43 RTA-26 All Days $89.66 $6.67 $29.38 50.53% $14.53 $2.08 $44.35 $3.30 3.1 0.23 RTA-27 All Days $106.77 $5.58 $8.42 11.82% $7.42 $0.62 $94.14 $4.92 12.7 0.66 RTA-28 All Days $106.77 $5.99 $7.52 13.41% $6.51 $0.55 $92.44 $5.18 14.2 0.80 RTA-29 All Days $106.77 $8.61 $12.63 7.15% $11.72 $2.18 $99.13 $7.99 8.5 0.68 RTA-3 All Days $89.65 $6.69 $15.97 6.38% $14.95 $2.36 $83.93 $6.26 5.6 0.42 RTA-30 All Days $89.66 $7.21 $11.77 8.07% $10.82 $1.55 $82.42 $6.63 7.6 0.61 RTA-31 All Days $89.66 $4.48 $11.94 8.38% $10.94 $1.58 $82.14 $4.10 7.5 0.38 RTA-32 All Days $89.66 $8.53 $7.59 13.16% $6.59 $0.96 $77.85 $7.41 11.8 1.12 RTA-33 All Days $89.65 $7.51 $9.96 9.34% $9.03 $1.29 $81.28 $6.81 9.0 0.75 RTA-3D All Days $106.76 $8.41 $9.10 8.39% $8.34 $1.55 $97.80 $7.70 11.7 0.92 RTA-40 All Days $89.65 $4.96 $18.77 5.26% $17.79 $2.54 $84.94 $4.70 4.8 0.26 RTA-41C All Days $89.66 $5.38 $17.69 4.93% $16.81 $2.46 $85.24 $5.12 5.1 0.30 RTA-41D All Days $106.77 $6.83 $6.11 14.26% $5.24 $0.97 $91.54 $5.85 17.5 1.12 RTA-42 All Days $89.66 $6.06 $9.71 8.90% $8.84 $1.27 $81.68 $5.52 9.2 0.62 RTA-49 All Days $106.77 $10.07 $7.36 12.78% $6.42 $1.19 $93.12 $8.79 14.5 1.37 RTA-50 All Days $89.64 $13.93 $75.81 96.53% $2.63 $1.44 $3.11 $0.48 1.2 0.18 RTA-51 All Days $89.67 $8.42 $4.95 95.96% $0.20 $0.11 $3.62 $0.34 18.1 1.70 RTA-52 All Days $89.66 $14.12 $7.94 191.34% ($7.25) ($1.04) ($81.90) ($12.90) 11.3 1.78 RTA-54 All Days $106.77 $21.35 $4.49 153.88% ($2.42) ($1.32) ($57.53) ($11.51) 23.8 4.76 RTA-54C All Days $89.68 $17.86 $47.70 69.33% $14.63 $7.99 $27.50 $5.48 1.9 0.37 RTA-55 All Days $89.64 $6.97 $5.55 18.96% $4.50 $2.46 $72.65 $5.65 16.2 1.26 RTA-61 All Days $89.66 $5.32 $14.22 7.04% $13.22 $1.89 $83.34 $4.94 6.3 0.37 RTA-74 All Days $89.66 $5.20 $9.67 10.36% $8.67 $1.24 $80.36 $4.66 9.3 0.54 RTA-79 All Days $89.65 $5.31 $11.82 8.46% $10.82 $1.55 $82.07 $4.86 7.6 0.45 RTA-8 All Days $89.66 $6.33 $8.31 11.87% $7.32 $1.07 $79.01 $5.58 10.8 0.76 Trans Track Manager"" Page 5 of 6 4/26/2018 IiNridi ("1-o prwim{ammsim Performance Indicators Table 3 - SRTP Route Statistics Riverside Transit Agency -- 7 FY 2018/19 All Routes Operating Operating Farebox Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Subsidy Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost Per Recovery Subsidy Per Passenger Revenue Revenue Passengers Passengers Route # Day Type Revenue Hour Revenue Mile Passenger Ratio Passenger Mile Hour Mile Per Hour Per Mile RTA-9 All Days $89.66 $4.09 $6.95 14.45% $5.94 $0.50 $76.70 $3.50 12.9 0.59 RTA-HEMDAR All Days $87.55 $5.69 $37.82 9.35% $34.29 $2.79 $79.36 $5.16 2.3 0.15 RTA-HernTax All Days $109.50 $3.61 $89.87 4.53% $85.80 $3.16 $104.53 $3.44 1.2 0.04 RTA-MTMDAR All Days $87.55 $5.10 $44.61 7.93% $41.07 $3.34 $80.61 $4.70 2.0 0.11 RTA-MTMTax All Days $93.75 $3.68 $39.98 9.93% $36.01 $2.76 $84.44 $3.32 2.3 0.09 RTA-NonDAR All Days $87.55 $5.21 $170.81 2.07% $167.27 $13.59 $85.73 $5.10 0.5 0.03 RTA-NonTax All Days $103.36 $3.64 $130.56 3.00% $126.63 $5.21 $100.25 $3.53 0.8 0.03 RTA-RSBDAR All Days $87.55 $5.19 $42.40 8.28% $38.89 $3.16 $80.30 $4.76 2.1 0.12 RTA-RSBTax All Days $104.10 $3.63 $58.05 6.88% $54.05 $2.88 $96.92 $3.38 1.8 0.06 Service Provider Totals $98.42 $6.43 $9.88 22.57% $7.65 $1.06 $76.20 $4.98 10.0 0.65 Trans Track Manager'" Page 6 of 6 4/26/2018 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2017/18 - FY 2019/20 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE 3A: FY 2018/19 INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS AS AT JULY 1, 2018 Route # I Route Class Route Description Cities/Communities Served Connections Directly Operated Fixed Routes: 1 Regional From UCR and Downtown Riverside to Galleria at Tyler and Corona Riverside, Home Gardens, Corona Metrolink, Corona Cruiser, primarilyvia University Ave and Magnolia Ave Omnitrans, SunLine RapidLink limited stop service from UCR and Downtown Riverside to Metrolink, Corona Cruiser, 101 Regional Galleria at Tyler and Corona primarily via University Ave and Riverside, Home Gardens, Corona Magnolia Ave Omnitrans loth St and Belle Ave in Corona via Main St and Grand Ave to the 3' Local Corona Transit Center, Norco College, Jurupa Valley and Eastvale via Corona, Riverside, Eastvale, Jurupa Valley Metrolink, Corona Cruiser Hamner Ave and Limonite Aves to Amazon Eastvale 10 Local From Big Springs St on Riverside's Northside to Galleria at Tyler Riverside Omnitrans primarily via Blaine St, Third St, Victoria Ave and Lincoln Ave 11 Local Circulator between Moreno Valley Mall and March Air Reserve Base Moreno Valley, March Joint Powers Authority SunLine primarily via Frederick St, Ironwood Ave, Heacock St and JFK Dr From Stephens Ave and Center St on Riverside's Northside, through 12 Local Downtown, then to Merced Dr at Magnolia Ave via Magnolia Ave, Riverside Omnitrans California Ave, and Jurupa Ave From Hunter Park Metrolink Station to Galleria at Tyler in Riverside 13 Local via Chicago Ave, MILK Blvd, Magnolia Ave, Central Ave, Arlington Riverside Metrolink, Omnitrans Ave, Colorado Ave, and Tyler St From Galleria at Tyler to Downtown Riverside via Indiana Ave and 14 Regional Brockton Ave, then University Ave and Iowa Ave and Center St then Riverside, Highgrove, Loma Linda Omnitrans to Loma Linda VA Hospital via Mount Vernon Ave and Barton Rd From Downtown Riverside to Galleria at Tyler to Magnolia Ave and Metrolink, Omnitrans, 15 Local Merced Dr via Magnolia Ave, Arlington Ave, La Sierra Ave, Tyler St, Riverside and Indiana Ave SunLine, OCTA From Moreno Valley Mall to UCR via Day St, Box Springs Rd, 16 Local Sycamore Canyon Blvd, Central Ave, Canyon Crest Dr, Campus Dr, Moreno Valley, Riverside SunLine University Ave, Iowa Ave, and Blaine St From Moreno Valley College to Moreno Valley Mall via Kitching St, 18 Local Perris Blvd, Cottonwood St and Frederick St, then Pigeon Pass Rd to Moreno Valley SunLine Sunnvmead Ranch From Moreno Valley Mall to Perris Station Transit Center via 19, Regional Sunnymead Blvd and Perris Blvd and Moreno Valley College with Moreno Valley, Perris Metrolink, SunLine service to distribution centers at Indian St and Morgan St From Magnolia Ave and Elizabeth Ln in Riverside to Moreno Valley 20 Regional College via Central Ave, Alessandro Blvd, Moreno Beach Dr, and Iris Riverside, Moreno Valley St with selected trips serving Moreno Valley March Field Metrolink Station weekdays 21 Local From Galleria at Tyler in Riverside to Fontana via Van Buren Blvd, Jurupa Valley, Fontana, Riverside Omnitrans Mission Blvd, and Country Village From Lake Elsinore Outlet Center and Perris Station Transit Center to 22 Regional Downtown Riverside via Hwy 74, Theda St, Ellis Ave, Old Elsinore Rd, Riverside, Woodcrest, Mead Valley, Perris, Good Hope, Metrolink, Omnitrans Clarke St, Wood Rd, Alessandro Blvd, Chicago Ave, and University Meadowbrook, Lake Elsinore Ave From Florida Ave and Lincoln Ave in East Hemet to Perris Station Riverside, Woodcrest, March Joint Powers Authority, 27 Regional Transit Center then to Galleria at Tyler in Riverside via Florida Ave, I- Perris, Romoland, Homeland, Hemet, East Hemet, Valle Metrolink 215 Fwv, and Van Buren Blvd Vista From Downtown Riverside to Amazon Eastvale via Rubidoux Blvd Metrolink, Omnitrans, 29 Regional and Limonite Ave. Selected trips deviate via Jurupa Valley/Pedley Eastvale, Jurupa Valley, Riverside station weekdays. SunLine From the Mead Valley Community Center to Moreno Valley with 41 Regional stops at Moreno Valley College and Riverside University Medical Moreno Valley, Perris, Mead Valley Center 49 Regional From Downtown Riverside to Country Village and Fontana via Jurupa Valley, Riverside, Fontana Omnitrans, SunLine Mission Blvd 54F Local Local circulator serving the Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station Riverside Metrolink, Omnitrans, and Downtown Riverside SunLine From San Bernardino Transit Center to Anaheim via SR-91 and SR-55 Omnitrans, ns, Metrolink, 200 Express Freeways with stops at Downtown Riverside and La Sierra Metrolink Riverside, Corona, Orange, Anaheim Stations, Village at Orange, and Anaheim Resort district SunLine OCTA, S 202 Express From Mulligans Murrieta and Promenade Mall Temecula to Murrieta, Temecula, Fallbrook, Bonsall, Oceanside Metrolink, NCTD Oceanside Transit Center 204 Express From UCR to Montclair TransCenter via Downtown Riverside, Riverside, Jurupa Valley, Ontario, Montclair Metrolink, Omnitrans, Country Village, and Ontario Mills Mall Foothill Transit From the Promenade Mall in Temecula to Village at Orange via 1-15 Temecula, Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, Temescal Valley, Metrolink, Corona Cruiser, 205 Express and SR-91 Fwys with stops in Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, Temescal Vallev, Dos Lagos, and Corona Transit Center Corona, Orange OCTA From Promenade Mall Temecula to Corona Transit Center via 1-15 Temecula, Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, Temescal Valley, 206 Express Freeway with stops in Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, Temescal Valley, and Dos Lagos Corona Metrolink, Corona Cruiser From Promenade Mall Temecula to Riverside Downtown Metrolink Temecula, Murrieta, Menifee, Perris, Riverside, Metrolink, Omnitrans, 208' Express Station via 1-215 with stops in Murrieta, Perris, Moreno Valley, and downtown Riverside Moreno Valley SunLine 210 Express From Beaumont to Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station with Beaumont, Moreno Valley, Riverside Metrolink, Pass Transit, stops in Moreno Valley and downtown Riverside Omnitrans, SunLine 217 Express From San Jacinto and Hemet to Temecula and Escondido via Hemet, San Jacinto, Temecula, Escondido NCTD, San Diego MTS Winchester Rd (State Hwy 79) and 1-15 1 This route has selected trips that are/will be both directly operated and contract operated. RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2017/18 - FY 2019/20 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE 3A: FY 2018/19 INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS AS AT JULY 1, 2018 Route # I Route Class Route Description Cities/Communities Served Connections Contracted Fixed Routes: loth St and Belle Ave in Corona via Main St and Grand Ave to the 31 Local Corona Transit Center, Norco College, Jurupa Valley and Eastvale via Corona, Riverside, Eastvale, Jurupa Valley Metrolink, Corona Cruiser Hamner Ave and Limonite Aves to Amazon Eastvale Serving Lake Elsinore Outlet Center, Walmart on Railroad Canyon 8 Local Rd, and Lakeland Village via Lakeshore Dr, Mission Trail, Grand Ave Lake Elsinore, Lakeland Village, Wildomar and Riverside Dr 19, Regional From Perris Station Transit Center to Exceed Facility on Trumble Rd Perris Metrolink 23 Local From Central & Palomar Sts Wildomar through Murrieta to County Wildomar, Murrieta, Temecula Center Dr in Temecula 24 Local Temecula service with stops at County Center Dr, Old Town, Temecula Pechanga Resort, and Temecula Valley Hospital Local circulator serving Moreno Valley March Field Metrolink Station Moreno Valley, March Joint Powers Authority, 26 Local and Moreno Valley Mall via Van Buren Blvd, Trautwein Rd, Riverside Metrolink Alessandro Blvd, Sycamore Canyon Blvd, and Eucalyptus Ave 30 Local Perris local circulator serving the Perris Transit Center, Walmart, Perris Metrolink May Ranch, and Weston Rd & Carter Dr Service from Hemet Valley Mall to Moreno Valley Mall via Banning and Beaumont with stops at Mt San Jacinto Community College, Sun Moreno Valley, Banning, Beaumont, Gilman Hot 31 Regional Lakes Village, Walmart on Moreno Beach Dr, Moreno Valley Senior Springs, San Jacinto, Hemet Pass Transit, SunLine Center, and Riverside University Medical Center 32 Local From Hemet Valley Mall to Mt. San Jacinto College via downtown San Jacinto, Hemet San Jacinto and San Jacinto Ave 33 Local From Super-Walmart on Sanderson Ave and the Hemet Valley Mall Hemet, East Hemet, Valle Vista in west Hemet to Stanford St and Thornton Ave in east Hemet 40 Regional From Walmart in Lake Elsinore to Cherry Hills Blvd in Menifee with Menifee, Canyon Lake, Lake Elsinore stops in Canyon Lake, and Quail Valley From the Mead Valley Community Center to Moreno Valley with 41 Regional stops at Moreno Valley College and Riverside University Medical Moreno Valley, Perris, Mead Valley Center 42 Local From the Hemet Valley Mall to Soboba Casino in San Jacinto via Hemet, San Jacinto Kirby St, Cottonwood Ave, Santa Fe Ave, and East Main St 50 Trolley Riverside downtown Jury Trolley service Riverside 51 Local Crest Cruiser UCR circulator to Canyon Crest Dr, Central Ave, Chicago Riverside SunLine Ave, University Ave, Iowa Ave Spruce St and Watkins Dr 52 Local Local circulator serving Hunter Park Metrolink Station and UCR via Riverside Metrolink Iowa Ave, Blaine St, and University Ave 54 Local Local circulator linking Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station and Riverside Metrolink, Omnitrans downtown Riverside 55 Trolley Temecula Trolley route, connecting Harveston community to local Temecula middle and high schools, and Promenade Mall From the Perris Station Transit Center to Cherry Hills Blvd and 61 Regional Bradley Rd in Menifee and Temecula with stops at MSJC Menifee Perris, Menifee, Murrieta, Temecula Metrolink campus, Loma Linda University Medical Center-Murrieta, and Countv Center Dr From San Jacinto and Hemet to Menifee and Perris, serving MSJC 74 Regional San Jacinto campus, Hemet Valley Mall, Winchester, MSJC Menifee San Jacinto, Hemet, Winchester, Menifee, Perris Metrolink campus, and Perris Station Transit Center From the Hemet Valley Mall to Old Town Temecula via Winchester 79 Regional Rd (State Hwy 79). Also serves County Center Dr, Promenade Mall, Hemet, Winchester, French Valley, Murrieta, Temecula Temecula City Hall, French Valley, and Southwest Justice Center 1 202 Express From Mulligans Murrieta and Promenade Mall Temecula to Murrieta, Temecula, Fallbrook, Bonsall, Oceanside Metrolink, NCiD Oceanside Transit Center From Promenade Mall Temecula to Riverside Downtown Metrolink Temecula, Murrieta, Menifee, Perris, Riverside, Metrolink, Omnitrans, 2081 Express Station via 1-215 with stops in Murrieta, Perris, Moreno Valley, and Moreno Valley SunLine downtown Riverside 2101 Express From Beaumont to Riverside Downtown Metrolink Station with Beaumont, Moreno Valley, Riverside Metrolink, Pass Transit, stops in Moreno Valley and downtown Riverside Omnitrans, SunLine 212 Express From Hemet and San Jacinto to Downtown Riverside with stops at San JacintoHemet, Perris, Riverside Metrolink, Omnitrans, Perris and UCR , SunLine 2171 Express From San Jacinto and Hemet to Temecula and Escondido via Hemet, San Jacinto, Temecula, Escondido NCiD, San Diego MTS Winchester Rd (State Hwy 79) and I-15 This route has selected trips that are/will be both directly operated and contract operated. Service is planned for discontinuation in January 2019. RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY FY 2017/18 - FY 2019/20 Short Range Transit Plan TABLE 3A: FY 2018/19 INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS AS AT JULY 1, 2018 Route # I Route Class Route Description Cities/Communities Served Connections Contracted Paratransit Routes: Banning, Beaumont, Corona, Eastvale, Good Hope, Riverside -San Bernadino UZA Origin -to -Destination Highgrove, Jurupa Valley, Loma Linda, Mead Valley, Meadowbrook, Moreno Valley, Norco, Perris, Quail Vallev. Riverside. Woodcrest Hemet UZA Origin -to -Destination East Hemet, Gillman Springs, Green Acres, Hemet, Homeland, San Jacinto, Valle Vista, Winchester Murrieta-Temecula-Menifee Canyon Lake, French Valley, Lake Elsinore, Lakeland UZA Origin -to -Destination Village, Menifee, Murrieta, Temecula, Wildomar, Romoland Non-UZA Origin -to -Destination March Joint Powers Authority Riverside Transit Agency FY 2018119 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 4 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2018119 r s Section 5307 Section Capita{ State of Measure A Section 5307 Murrietai " 5339 Bus & Project Total Amount Good Repair Operating - Riv-san Temecula/ Section 5307 - Section Section Bus a Other Project Description Number of Funds LTF STA (SGR) STA Assistance Bernardino Monifee Hemet CMAQ 5310 5311 Facilities LCTOP Farebox Revenue Operating Assistance 44,656,614 38.394,264 3,393,882 2,500,000 568,468 Operating Assistance - CTSA 939,575 939,575 Capitalized Preventive Maintenance 8,375,000 1,675,000 5,200,000 1,504,006 Capital Cost of Contracting 8,125,000 1,625,000 4.000,000 2,500,000 AIDA Complementary Paratransh Service 3 1,937,500 387,500 1.100,000 450,000 JARC Operating Assistance 9 1,860,160 837,072 837,072 186,016 Travel Training ° 408,773 408,773 RapidLinkOperating Assistance' 1,800.000 447,000 1,161,000 86,400 106,000 Route 200: 91 Express Services 2,700.000 1,475,000 900,000 325,400 PVL Feeder Services (Ries 26.52.54) Z 1,087.000 7.087,000 Route 54F: FOL Shuttle 2 74,757 74,757 Route 205 5 450.000 400,OOD 50,000 Route 19 Frequency Expansion 1,325,000 1,126,250 198,750 Route 28 Frequency Expansion 291.337 262.203 29,134 Fare Study 160,000 32,000 128.000 OPEB Expense 1.600,000 1,600,000 Farebox {Cash, Coin, Tickets, Passes) 8.745,353 8,745,353 Interest Income 300,000 300,000 Advertising Revenue 15,000 15,000 CNG Sales 100,000 100,000 LCFS Credits 400,000 400,000 RINs Credits 1,000,17)00 1,000,OD0 Medi-Cal Reimbursement 1,050,000 525.000 525,000 Wentworth Lease 65,840 65,840 Subtotal: Operating $87,666,909 $46,997,836 $0 $0 $5,633,457 $11,265,072 $4,450,000 $2,500,000 $1,161,000 $408,773 $568,463 $0 $1,474,453 $10,802,010 $2,405,840 Revenue Vehicles- (33) COFR Replace FY19-1 7,239,953 1,0851993 6,153,960 Revenue Vehicles - (29) DAR Rapt FY19-2 3,029,005 454,351 2,574,654 Non -Revenue Vehicles - (8) cars, (1) truck FY19-3 266.726 53,345 213,381 Capitalized Tire Lease FY19A 350,535 70,107 280,428 Associated Transit Improvements FY19-5 200,000 40.000 160,000 Facility Maintenance FY1" 897,036 179,407 717,629 Information Systems FY19-7 1,846,665 369.333 1,477,332 Hemet Mobility Hub 7 FY19-8 406.936 81.387 - 325,549 Hemet Mobility Hub 7 FY19-8 2.032,203 416,441 - 1,625,762 Operations & Maintenance Facility 7 FY17-9 (2,032,203) '406.441) - (1,625,762) Operations & Maintenance Facility FY19-9 10,000,000 10,000,000 Facilities & Fuel Station Enhancements 1__Y19-10 1,856,095 1,856,095 H-D CNG Revenue Vehicles (14) Replace. FY19-11 10,000,000 10,000,OOp Subtotal: Capital $36,092,9611 $0 $22,333,923 $1,856,095 $0 $9,659,624 $0 $1,917,760 $0 $0 $0 $325,549 $0 $0 $0 Total: Operating & Capital $123,759,860 $46,997,836 $22,333,923 $1,856,095 $5,633,457 $20,924,696 $4,450,000 $4,417,7601 $1,161,0001 $408,773 $568,468 $325,5491 $1,474,453 $10,802,010 $2.405.840 RapidLink Operating Assistance utilizes FY15 CMAQ grant CA-95-X296 (FTIP No: RIV151211). 2 PVL routes funded with RCTC CMAQ grant, which is farebox recovery ratio allowable. 3 Includes DAR Plus Costs, formerly partially funded with Measure A but now using LTF. Travel Training will use remainder of existing CalTrans 5310 (Standard Agreements 644532 & 644539) awarded December 2015 plus new 5310 grant (expected to be awarded by July 2018). 5 Route 200 and 205 partially funded with Commuter Assistance Measure A (vs CTSA or Western County Bus Measure A). Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities- Small Urban funding is FY2017 apportionment- FYI 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities -Urban being re -programmed from Central Operations & Maintenance Facility project. 9 LCTOP funding programmed herein is less than the amount provided by Caltrans. RTA is only programming expected need. LCTOP funding used for operating is Farebox allowable revenue. 9 Routes 3D, 3C, 30, 33, 40, 42, 61, 74, 79, 212, 217D, 217C Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY19-1 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Replacement Revenue Vehicles for Contract Operations PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (33) replacement CNG revenue vehicles for use on contract operated fixed route service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace vehicles used for contract operated fixed route service that have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-19 Dec-22 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES RE VESTED Funding Source FY 2019 Sec 5307 $ 6,153, 960 STA $ 1,085,993 Total $ 7,239,953 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT # FTIP 1D # AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT M FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance (as of 3116118) CA-2016-023 RIV150604 FY16-2 STA (16) COFR Vehicles $ 2,224,325 CA-2017-031 R1V170103 FYI 7-1 STA (10) COFR Vehicles $ 1,983,400 CA-2018-027 RIV180704 FY18-1 STA (11) COFR Vehicles $ 2,162,050 Total $ 6,369, 775 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY19-2 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Replacement Revenue Vehicles for Demand Response Operations PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (29) replacement unleaded revenue vehicles for use on demand response service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace vehicles used for demand response service that have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-19 Dec-22 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES RE UESTED Funding Source FY 2019 Sec 5307 $ 2, 574,654 S TA $ 4541351 Total $ 3,029,005 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT # FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Unexpended FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Balance Description (as of 3116118) CA-2017-031 RIV170104 FY17-2 STA (33) DAR $ 1,455,440 vehicles CA-2018-027 RIV180705 FY18-2 STA (5) DAR $ 466,813 vehicles Total $ 1, 922, 253 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY19-3 PROJECT NAME FTIP No. - Non -Revenue Vehicles PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of replacement and expansion support vehicles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replacement of (1) truck and (8) support cars. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-19 LDec-22 UMOTlxON Funding Source FY 2019 Sec 5307 $ 213,381 STA $ 53,345 Total $ 266,726 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT # FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Unexpended FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Balance Description (as of 3116118) CA-2016-023 RIV150606 FY16-4 STA (22) support $ 140, 791 vehicles CA-2018-027 RIV180706 FY18-3 STA (6) support $ 315, 796 vehicles Total $ 456, 587 Table 4A -- Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY19-4 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Capitalized Tire Lease PROJECT DESCRIPTION Capital cost of leasing bus tires. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION As part of the Agency's maintenance program, tires are inspected and replaced based on tread wear and air pressure. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Com letion Date Jul-18 4Dec-21 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2019 Sec 5307 $ 280,428 STA $ 70,107 Total $ 350,535 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT # FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #! Unexpended FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Balance Description (as of 3116118) CA-2017-031 RIV170107 FY17-5 STA Capitalized Tire $ 248,267 Lease CA-2018-027 RI V 180708 FY18-5 STA Capitalized Tire $ 350,000 Lease Total $ 598,267 Table 4A — Capital P oject Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY19-5 FTIP No. - PROJECT NAME Associated Transit Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Enhancement of the bus stop system such as: installation of bus shelters and benches, kiosks, signage, and lighting to enhance security and safety of the riding public, and enhance access for persons with disabilities. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Enhancement of transit facilities promotes safety and security and encourages residents to use transit due to improved convenience while waiting for bus. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-19 Dec-22 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES RE UESTED Funding Source FY 2019 Sec 5307 $ 160,000 STA $ 40,000 Total $ 200,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE PTA GRANT #. FTIP ID #. AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT M FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance (as of 3116118) CA-90-Z128 RIV130604 FY14-5 STA Assoc Transit Impr $ 124,065 CA-90-Z262 RIV140830 FY15-6 STA Assoc Transit Impr $ 149,500 CA-2016-023 RIV140830 FYI 6-5 STA Assoc Transit Impr $ 1,100,000 CA-2017-031 RI V 170105 FYI 7-3 STA Assoc Transit Impr $ 200, 000 CA-2018-027 RI V FYI 8-4 STA Assoc Transit Impr $ 50,000 Table 4A — Cal2ital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY19-6 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Facility Maintenance PROJECT DESCRIPTION Maintenance of Riverside, Hemet and Corona facilities. Projects may include, but are not limited to, furniture, flooring, paint, plumbing, electrical, lighting, HVAC, roof, parking lot and concrete and CNG compressors. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Facilities require routine maintenance to keep them in optimal condition consistent with Transit Asset Management principles. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-19 Dec-22 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES RE VESTED Funding Source FY 2019 Sec 5307 $ 717,629 STA $ 179,407 Total $ 897,036 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED 1I1Vr'_1 [InF FTd rRAA[T ;9 FTIP rn it Amn Qr_Tr,S r_Aotrai fZDA lT nhks FTA Grant # FTIP iD # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance (as of 3116118) CA-90-Z262 RI V 140833 FY15-9 STA Facility Maint $ 57,415 CA-2016-023 RI V 150610 FY16-8 STA Facility Maint $ 1, 017, 530 CA-2016-148 FY17-10 STA Facility Maint $ 860,713 CA-2017-031 RiV170109 FY17-7 STA Facility Maint $ 266,760 CA-2018-027 RIV180710 FY18-7 STA Facility Maint $ 2,039,231 Total $ 4, 241, 649 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY19-7 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Information Systems PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project includes, but is not limited to, the purchase of computers, printers, servers, audio-visual equipment, copiers, software, and mobile data terminals. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Hardware and software to maintain and/or improve Agency efficiency and technology. PROJECT SCHFl71ll F Start Date Completion Date Jan-19 I Dec-22 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES RE VESTED Fundin2 Source FY 2019 Sec 5307 $ 1,477,332 S TA $ 369,333 Total $ 1846,665 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (IAIrl IMF FTd r1RAAIT ft FTIP In ft AAM I?rTr _C r APITAI tZDAMT dfi Unexpended FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Balance Description (as of 3116118) CA-90-Z262 RI V 140834 FY15-10 STA Information $ 219,286 Systems CA-2016-023 RIV150611 FYI 6-9 STA Information $ 329,120 Systems CA-2017-031 RIV170110 FYI 7-8 STA Information $ 90,000 Systems CA-2018-027 RIV180711 FY18-8 STA Information $ 1,100,000 S stems Total $ 1, 738,406 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY19-8 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Hemet Mobility Hub PROJECT DESCRIPTION Design and construct a mobility hub in downtown Hemet PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The City of Hemet's Downtown Specific Plan has identified a need for an intermodal Mobility Hub to meet the projected demand for local and regional transit services. The project site is a 14.5 acre parcel owned by the City of Hemet. RTA routes 27, 31, 32, 33, 42, 74, 79, 212 and 217 currently serve the Hemet area. This Mobility Hub will allow RTA to expand future service in response to growth in this region as outlined in the Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA). The Mobility Hub Conceptual Plan and A&E services are currently underway, and upon completion, a defined scope of work for construction of the hub will be produced. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jul-19 Dec-22 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES RE UESTED Funding Source FY 2019 Sec 5339 $ 325,549 STA $ 81,387 Sec 5339 $ 1,625,762 STA $ 406,441 Total $ 2,439,139 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #. FTIP ID #. AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance (as of 3116118) CA-03-0703 Hemet Mobility Hub $ 72,767 TUMF $ 506,821 FY04 L TF $ 3,115 FY16 5339 Grant - Not Yet Applied FY18-9 STA Hemet Mobility Hub $ 396,849 Total $ 979,552 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY19-9 PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION FTIP No: Central Operations & Maintenance Facility Planning, design, land acquisition and construction of the new Operations and Maintenance Facility. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The current base in Riverside is at capacity. The agency needs to identify a new location to accommodate growth. Start Date Completion Date Jan- 19 Dec-22 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REUES TED Funding Source FY 2019 S TA $ 10,000,000 Total $ 10,000,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY19-10 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Existing Facility and Fueling Stations Enhancements and Upgrades PROJECT DESCRIPTION Enhancements and upgrades to existing RTA infrastructure. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION New SB 1 State of Good Repair funds were allocated to RTA. This action represents the programming of said funds. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jul-19 Jun-22 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES RE UESTED Funding Source FY 2019 SB 1 SGR $ 1,856,095 Total $ 1,856,095 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #. FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance (as of 3116118) Table 4A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY19-11 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Heavy-duty CNG Bus Fleet Replacement PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replacement of (14) of existing 145 Gillig buses. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The current fleet should not be replaced in bulk as done in the past. The agency needs to accumulate funding to buy replacements over a multi -year period. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Com letion Date Jan- 19 Dec-22 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES RE UESTED Funding Source FY 2019 STA $ 10, 000, 000 $ - Total $ 10, 000, 000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT # FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Riverside Transit Agency FY 2919120 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.1 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2019/20 Section 5307 Capital State of Measure A Section 5307 - Murrieta/ ' Project Total Amount of Good Repair Operating - Riv-San Temecula! Section 5307 ' Section s Other Proiect Description Number Funds LTF STA (SGR) STA Assistance 9emardino Menifee - Hemet CMAQ 5310 Section 5311 LCTOP Farebox Revenue FY 2019/2020 Operating Assistance 47,099,444 40,313,977 - - 3,563,576 - - 2,625,000 - - 596.891 - - - Operating Assistance - CTSA 986,554 - - - 986,554 - - - - _ _ Capitalized Preventive Maintenance 8,793,750 1,758,750 - - - 5,460,000 1.575,000 Capital Cost of Contracting 3 0,531.250 1,706,250 - - - 4,200,000 2.625.000 ADA Complementary Paratransit Service' 2,034.375 406,875 - - - 1,155,000 472.500 JARC Operating Assistance 1,953,168 878,926 - - - 878.926 - - - - - - 195,317 - Travel Training4 42.0,212 - - - - - - - - 429,212 - - - - RapidLinkOperatingAssistance' 1,890000 469,350 - - - - _ - 1,219,050 - - 90.300 111,300 - Route 20091 Express Service 2,835,000 1,548,750 - - 945,000 - - - - _ _ _ 341,250 - PVLFeeder Services (Ries 26,52,54) 2 1,141,350 - - - - - - _ _ _ _ - 1.141,350 - Route 54F: FOL Shuttle a 78,495 - - - - - - - _ _ _ - 78,495 - Route 205 472,500 - - - 420,000 - - - - - - - 52,500 - Route 19 Frequency Expansion 1,391,250 - - - - - - - _ _ _ 1,182,563 208.688 - Route 26 Frequency Expansion 597,241 - - - - - - - - - - 537,517 59.724 - OPEB Expense 1,680,000 1,660,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - Farehox (Cash, Coin, Tickets, Passes) 9.182,621 - - - - - - - _ - - _ 9.182.621 - Interest Income 315.000 - - - - - - _ _ _ - _ - 315,000 Advertising Revenue 15,750 - - - - - - - - - - _ - 15,750 CNG Sales 105000 - - - - - - - - - - - - 105,000 LCFS Credits 420,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - 420,000 RINs Credits 1,050,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,050,000 Medi-Cal Reimbursement 1,102,500 551,250 - - - - - - - - - - 551,25c Wentworth Lease S9,132 69,132 Subtotal: FY19/20 Operating S92,173,592 $49,314,128 $0 $0 $5,915,130 $11,693.926 $4,672,500 $2,625,000 $1,219,050 $429,212 $596,891 $1,810,380 $11,371,244 $2,526,132 Heavy Duty CNG Bus Flee( Replacement FY20-1 5,000,00o 5,000,000 Revenue Vehicles - (29) DAR Replacements FY2o-2 3,149,355 472,403 2.876,952 Nan -Revenue Vehicles - (1) Support Vehicle FY20-3 78,332 15,66e 62.666 Associated Transit Improvements FY2" 187,500 37,500 110.000 40000 Capital Maintenance Spares FY20-5 383,252 76,650 306.602 Capitalized Tire Lease FY20-6 396,523 79,305 317,218 MaintenancelSuppon Equipment FY20-7 57,500 11,500 46.000 Facility Maintenance FY20-8 831,563 166,313 665.250 information Systems FY20-9 100,000 20,Oo0 80,000 Central Operations & Maintenance Facility FY20-10 10,000.000 10,000000 Subtotal: FY19120 Capital 520,184,025 $0 $15,879,337 $o $0 $775,250 $419,8841 $3.109,554 $0 so $0 sal $o $0 Total: Operating & Capital FY19120 $112,357,617 $49,314,128 $15,679,3371 $0 $5,915,130 $12,469,176 $5,092.3841 S5,7U.554IS1,219,0501 $4213,212 $556,891 [$1,810,3801$11,371.2441 $2,526, 132 RapidUnk Operating Assistance utilizes FY15 CMAQ grant CA-95-M6 (FTIP No: RIV151211), PVL routes funded with ROTC CMAQ grant, which is farebox recovery ratio allowable, 3 Includes DAR Plus Costs. 4 Travel Training will use new 5310 grant (expected to be awarded by July 2018)- a LCTOP funding used for operating is farebox allowable revenue. Table MA — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY20-1 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Heavy duty CNG Bus Fleet Replacement PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replacement of (7) of existing 145 Gillig buses. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The current fleet should not be replaced in bulk as done in the past. The agency needs to accumulate funding to buy replacements over a multi -year period. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Com letion Date Jan-19 1 Dec-22 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES RE VESTED Funding Source FY 2019 S TA $ 5,000,000 Total $ 5,000,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #. FTIP_1D_ #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #1 Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Proiect Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY20-2 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Replacement Revenue Vehicles for Demand Response Operations PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (29) replacement unleaded revenue vehicles for use on demand response service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace vehicles used for demand response service that have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date 4Dec-23 Com letion Date Jan-20 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES RE UESTED Funding Source FY 2020 Sec 5307 $ 2,676,952 STA $ 472, 403 Total $ 3149,355 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #. FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT # FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table MA — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY20-3 PROJECT NAME FTIP No: Non -Revenue Vehicles PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of replacement support vehicles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replacement of (1) truck that has met its useful life requirement. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-20 Dec-23 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES IREOL Funding Source FY 2020 Sec 5307 $ 62,666 S TA $ 15,666 Total $ 78.332 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY20-4 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Associated Transit Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Enhancement of the bus stop system such as: installation of bus shelters and benches, kiosks, signage, and lighting to enhance security and safety of the riding public, and enhance access for persons with disabilities. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Enhancement of transit facilities promotes safety and security and encourages residents to use transit due to improved convenience while waiting for bus. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-20 Dec-23 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2020 Sec 5307 $ 150,000 S TA $ 3 7, 500 Total $ 187,500 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID _#, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT J# FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.9A —Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY20-5 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Capita! Maintenance Spares PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of spare parts for rolling stock under the bus maintenance program. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Purchase of vehicle parts based on projected needs whose individual costs meet the requirement for capital reimbursement. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-20 Dec-23 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2020 Sec 5307 $ 306,602 S TA $ 76,650 Total $ 383 252 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT # FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A - Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY20-6 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Capitalized Tire Lease PROJECT DESCRIPTION Capital cost of leasing bus tires. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION As part of the Agency's maintenance program, tires are inspected sand replaced based on tread wear and air pressure. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jul-19 Dec-22 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2020 Sec 5307 $ 317,218 S TA $ 79,305 Total $ 396,523 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT # FTIP 1D # AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A - Capital Proiect Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY20-7 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Support Equipment PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of support equipment items including, but not limited to, office equipment, shop air compressors, scissors lift, portable cranes, hand jacks, drill breaker and pressure washers. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Miscellaneous maintenance and support equipment and improvements to support ongoing operations. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-20 Dec-22 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2020 Sec 5307 $ 46,000 STA $ 11,500 Total $ 57,500 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT # FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT # FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY20-8 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Facility Maintenance PROJECT DESCRIPTION Maintenance of Riverside, Hemet, and Corona facilities. Project may include, but is not limited to, furniture, flooring, paint, plumbing, electrical, lighting, HVAC, roof, parking lot and concrete and CNG compressors. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Facilities require routine maintenance to keep them in optimal condition. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-20 I Dec-23 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2020 Sec 5307 $ 665,250 STA $ 166,313 Total $ 831563 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #. FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #i FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.1A — Capital Proiect Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY20-9 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Information Systems PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project includes but is not limited to the purchase of computers, printers, servers, audio-visual equipment, copiers, software, and mobile data terminals. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Computers and software to improve Agency efficiency and technology. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-20 Dec-23 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2020 Sec 5307 $ 80,000 STA $ 20,000 Total $ 100,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended] Balance (as of 3116117) Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY20-10 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Central Operations & Maintenance Facility PROJECT DESCRIPTION Planning, design, land acquisition and construction of the new Operations and Maintenance Facility. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The current base in Riverside is at capacity. The agency needs to identify a new location to accommodate growth. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan- 19 1 Dec-22 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES RE VESTED Funding Source FY 2020 STA $ 10, 000, 000 Total $ 10, 000, 000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP 1D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #i Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Riverside Transit Agency FY 2020121 Summary of Funds Requested Short Range Transit Plan Table 5.2 - Summary of Funds Requested for FY 2020121 Section 5307 Capital State of Measure A Section 5307 - Murristal Project Total Amount of Good Repair Operating - Riv-San Temecula/ Section 5307 ' Section s Other Project Dascripbon Number Funds LTF STA (SGR) STA Assistance Bernardino Menife-e - Hemet CMAQ 5310 Section 5311 LCTOP Farebox Revenue FY 202012021 Operating Assistance 49.454,417 42,329,a76 - - 3,741.755 - - 2.756.250 - - 626,736 - - - OperatingAssistance -CTSA 1,035,681 - - - 1,035,881 - - - - - - - - - Capitalized Preventive Maintenance 9,233,438 1,846,688 - - - 5,733.000 1.653,750 - - - - - - - Capital Cost of Contracting' 8.957.013 1,791,563 - - - 4,410,000 2,756,250 - - - - - - - ADA Complementary Paratransit Servicea 2.136,094 427,219 - - - 1,212,750 496,125 - - - - - - - JARC Operating Assistance 2,050.826 922,872 - - - 922,872 - - - - - - 205,003 - TravelTraining° 450672 - - - - - - - - 450,672 - - - - RapidLink Operating Assistance' 1,984,500 492,818 - - - - - - 1,280.003 - - 94,815 116,865 - Route 2GO1 91 Express Service 2,976,750 1,628,188 - - 992,25e - - - - - - - 358.313 - PVLFeeder Services (Ries 26,52,54) 2 1,198,418 - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - 1,198,418 - Route 54F: FOL Shuttle 62,420 - - - - - - - - - - - 82,420 - Route 205 496,125 - - - 441.000 - - - - - - 55,125 - Route 19 Frequency Expansion 1.460,813 - - - - - - - - - - 1,241,691 218,122 - Route 28 Frequency Expansion 627,103 - - - - - - - - _ - 564.393 62,710 - OPEB Expense 1,764,000 1,764,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - Farebox (Cash, Coin, Tickets, Passes) 9,641,752 - - - - - - - - - - - 9.641,752 - interest Income 330,750 - - - - - - - - - - - 330,750 Advertising Revenue 16,538 - - - - - - - - - - - - 16,538 ONG Sales 11D,250 - - - - - - - - - - - - 110,250 -CFS Credits 441.000 - - - - - - - - - - - - 441,000 RINs Credits 1,102,500 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,102,500 MedaCal Reimbursement 1,157,625 578,813 - - - - - - - - - - - 578,813 Wentworth Lease 72,589 72,589 Subtotal: FY20121 Operating $96,782,271 $51,779,834 s0 $0 $6,210,8861 $12,278,622 $4,906,125 $2,756,250 $1,280,003 $450,572. $626,736 $1,900,899 $11,939,806 $2.652,439 Heavy Duty CNG Bus Ffeet Replacement FY21-1 5,000,000 5,000,000 Revenue Vehicles - (4) COFR Replacements FY21-2 936,100 140,415 795,a85 Non -Revenue Vehicles- (4) Support Vehicles FY213 111,022 22.204 88,818 Associated Transit Improvements FY21-4 187.500 37.500 150,coo Capita! Maintenance Spares FY21-5 371,834 74.367 297.467 Capitalized Tire Lease FY21-6 415,405 83,081 332,324 WirlenancWSupport Equipment FY21-7 50,000 10,000 40,000 Information Systems FY21-8 100,000 11.182 88,818 Central Operations & Maintenance Facility FY21-9 10,000,000 10,000,000 Subtotal: FY20121 Capital $17,171,861 $0 $15,378,750 so $0 $1,799,111 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 50 §0 Total: Operating & Capital FY20121 $113,954,132 $51,779,834 515,378,750 $0 $6,210,886 $14,071,733 $4.906,125 $2,756,2501$1,280,0031 $450,6721 $626,7361 $1,900,899 $11,939,806 52,652,A39 1 Rapidl-ink Operating Assistance utilizes FY15 CMAQ grant CA-95-X296 (FTIP W RIV151211). 2 PVL routes funded with ROTC CMAQ grant, which is farebox recovery ratio allowable. 3 Includes OAR Plus Costs, formerly partially funded with Measure A. Travel Training will use remainder of existing Cali 5310 (Standard Agreements 644532 & 644539) awarded December 2015 plus new 5310 grant (expected to be awarded by July 2018), 7 Section 5339 Sus and Bus Facilities funding is Hemet UZA FY2017 apportionment. a LCTOP funding used for operating is farebox allowable revenue. Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY21-1 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Heavy-duty CNG Bus Fleet Replacement PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replacement of (7) of existing 145 Gillig buses. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The current fleet should not be replaced in bulk as done in the past. The agency needs to accumulate funding to buy replacements over a multi -year period. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date oml2letion Date Jan-2 1 Dec-24 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES LREQVESTED Funding Source FY 2021 STA $ 5,000,000 Total 1 $ 5 000 000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #, AND RCT_ C_ 'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY21-2 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Replacement Revenue Vehicles for Contract Operations PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of (4) replacement CNG revenue vehicles for use on contract operated fixed route service. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replace vehicles used for contract operated fixed route service that have reached the end of their service life per FTA guidelines. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-21 Dec-24 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES RE UES TED Funding Source FY 2019 Sec 5307 $ 795,685 STA $ 140,415 Total $ 936100 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP 1D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance (as of 3116118) CA-2016-023 RI V 150604 FY16-2 STA (16) COFR Vehicles $ 2,224,325 CA-2017-031 RIV170103 FYI 7-1 STA (10) COFR Vehicles $ 1,983,400 CA-2018-027 RIV180704 FY18-1 STA (11) COFR Vehicles $ 2,162,050 Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY21-3 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Non -Revenue Vehicles PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of replacement support vehicles. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Replacement of (3) support cars and (1) truck that have met their useful life requirement. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-21 Dec-24 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2021 Sec 5307 $ 88,818 STA $ 22,204 Total $ 119 022 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP 1D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #} FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY21-4 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Associated Transit Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION Enhancement of the bus stop system such as: installation of bus shelters and benches, kiosks, signage, and lighting to enhance security and safety of the riding public, and enhance access for persons with disabilities. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Enhancement of transit facilities promotes safety and security and encourages residents to use transit due to improved convenience while waiting for bus. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date 4Dec-24 Com letion Date Jan-21 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES /RF(JUFSTFDI Funding Source FY 2021 Sec 5307 $ 150,000 STA $ 37,500 Total $ 187 500 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT#, FTIP ID #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT M FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY21-5 PROJECT NAME FTIP No: Capital Maintenance Spares PROJECT DESCRIPTION Purchase of spare parts for rolling stock under the bus maintenance program. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Purchase of vehicle parts based on projected needs whose individual costs meet the requirement for capital reimbursement. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-21 Dec-24 FUNDING SOURCES Funding Source FY 2021 Sec 5307 $ 297,467 STA $ 74,367 Total $ 371,834 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP 1D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.2A — Capital Prol'ect Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY21-6 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Capitalized Tire Lease PROJECT DESCRIPTION Capital cost of leasing bus tires. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION As part of the Agency's maintenance program, tires are inspected sand replaced based on tread wear and air pressure. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jul-20 LDec-23 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES (REQUESTED) Funding Source FY 2021 Sec 5307 $ 332,324 S TA $ 83,081 Others Total $ 415 405 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #s FTIP ID # AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP 1D # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY21-7 PROJECT NAME PROJECT DESCRIPTION FTIP No: Maintenance/Support Equipment Purchase of support equipment items including, but not limited to, office equipment, shop air compressors, scissors lift, portable cranes, hand jacks, drill breaker and pressure washers. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Miscellaneous maintenance and support equipment and improvements to support ongoing operations. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-21 Dec-24 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES RE UESTED Funding Source FY 2021 Sec 5307 $ 40,000 S TA $ 10,000 Total $ 50,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #. AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT # FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance Table 5.2A -- Capital Project, Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY21-8 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Information Systems PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project includes but is not limited to the purchase of computers, printers, servers, audio-visual equipment, copiers, software, and mobile data terminals. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Computers and software to improve Agency efficiency and technology. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-2 9 Dec-24 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES REQUESTED Funding Source FY 2021 Sec 5307 $ 80,000 STA $ 20000 Total $ 100,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #, FTIP ID #. AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) FTA Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Descri Lion Unexpended Balance (as of 3116117) Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification PROJECT NUMBER SRTP Project No: FY21-9 FTIP No: PROJECT NAME Central Operations & Maintenance Facility PROJECT DESCRIPTION Planning, design, land acquisition and construction of the new Operations and Maintenance Facility. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION The current base in Riverside is at capacity. The agency needs to identify a new location to accommodate growth. PROJECT SCHEDULE Start Date Completion Date Jan-20 Dec-23 PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES LREQVESTED Funding Source FY 2021 STA $ 10, 000, 000 Total $ 10,000,000 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS OF A SIMILAR NATURE WITH UNEXPENDED BALANCE INCLUDING PROJECTS APPROVED BUT NOT YET ORDERED (INCLUDE FTA GRANT #1 FTIP 1D #, AND RCTC'S CAPITAL GRANT #) Grant # FTIP ID # RCTC Grant # Project Description Unexpended Balance TABLE 6: Progress to Implement FTA Triennial Review Audit Recommendations Actions Taken and Results (covering FY 2012/13 — 2014/15) Inadequate oversight of subrecipient / third- The grantee must submit approved party contractor / lessees. procedures to the FTA regional office to monitor other entities with responsibility for meeting FTA requirements. The grantee must provide evidence of staff training. Closed:5/17/2016 Lacking a language assistance plan. The grantee must provide the FTA RCRO with evidence of RTA and contractor staff training as outlined in the LAP as well as evidence that LAP training will be conducted in accordance with RTA's Title VI program in the future. Closed:5/17/2016 No contract administration system. The grantee must provide the FTA regional office with documentation of an adequate contract administration system. The grantee must submit to the FTA regional office revised contract administration procedures, evidence of board approval and documentation of staff training. Closed: 4/20/2016 FY19-FY21 SRTP limid[ ("1-o prwim{mvmsim Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FY 2017/18 Short Range Transit Plan Review Riverside Transit Agency Data Elements FY 2017/18 Plan FY 2017118 Target FY 2017/18 Year to Date Through 3rd Quarter Year to Date Performance Scorecard Unlinked Passenger Trips 8,878,206 Passenger Miles 63,807,121 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Hours 874,092.0 Total Actual Vehicle Revenue Miles 13,378,809.0 Total Actual Vehicle Miles 16,844,518.0 Total Operating Expenses $81,598,830 Total Passenger Fare Revenue $14,892,546 Net Operating Expenses $66,706,284 Performance Indicators Mandatory: 1. Farebox Recovery Ratio 18.25% >= 17.44% 1 21.44% 1 Meets Target Discretionary: 1. Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour $93.35 <_ $89.52 $88.76 Meets Target 2. Subsidy Per Passenger $7.51 >_ $5.61 and <_ $7.59 $7.04 Meets Target 3. Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $1.05 >_ $0.79 and <_ $1.07 $0.99 Meets Target 4. Subsidy Per Hour $76.31 >_ $59.14 and <_ $80.02 $69.73 Meets Target 5. Subsidy Per Mile $4.99 >_ $3.83 and <_ $5.19 $4.56 Meets Target 6. Passengers Per Revenue Hour 10.20 >= 8.93 and <= 12.08 9.90 Meets Target 1 7. Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.66 >= 0.58 and <= 0.78 0.65 Meets Target Note: Must meet at least 4 out of 7 Discretionary Performance Indicators Productivity Performance Summary: Service Provider Comments: TransTrack Manager- Page 1 of I 4/25/2018 FY 2018/19 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report lliyi li (wiry l-ueprwim(anRsim Service Provider; Riverside Transit Agency All Routes Performance Indicators FY 2016/17 End of Year Actual FY 2017/18 3rd Quarter Year -to -Date FY 2018/19 Plan FY 2018/19 Target Plan Performance Scorecard (a) Passengers 8,741,975 6,407,761 8,873,832 None Passenger Miles 62,116,347 45,473,436 64,015,300 None Revenue Hours 833,488.7 646,830.7 890,739.0 None Total Hours 959,993.5 745,178.3 1,017,667.0 None Revenue Miles 12,875,332.2 9,897,423.1 13,625,761.0 None Total Miles 16,062,434.4 12,388,837.5 16,779,794.0 None Operating Costs $70,437,592 $57,410,901 $87,666,909 None Passenger Revenue $14,538,806 $12,306,493 $19,790,760 None Operating Subsidy $55,898,786 $45,104,408 $67,876,149 None Operating Costs Per Revenue Hour $84.51 $88.76 $98.42 <_ $90.62 Fails to Meet Target Operating Cost Per Revenue Mile $5.47 $5.80 $6.43 None Operating Costs Per Passenger $8.06 $8.96 $9.88 None Farebox Recovery Ratio 20.64% 21.44% 22.57% >= 16.7% Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger $6.39 $7.04 $7.65 >_ $5.98 and <_ $8.10 Meets Target Subsidy Per Passenger Mile $0.90 $0.99 $1.06 >_ $0.84 and <_ $1.14 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Hour $67.07 $69.73 $76.20 >_ $59.27 and <_ $80.19 Meets Target Subsidy Per Revenue Mile $4.34 $4.56 $4.98 >_ $3.88 and <_ $5.24 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Hour 10.50 9.90 10.00 >= 8.42 and <= 11.39 Meets Target Passengers Per Revenue Mile 0.68 0.65 0.65 1 >= 0.55 and <= 0.75 Meets Target a) The Plan Performance Scorecard column is the result of comparing the FY 2018/19 Plan to the FY 2018/19 Primary Target. TransTrack Manager- Page 1 of 1 5/23/2018 TABLE 9A — HIGHLIGHTS OF FY 18/19 SRTP Operating & Financial FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 Data Audited Audited Audited Budget Planned Systemwide Ridership 9,651,592 9,238,265 8,741,975 8,878,2021 8,873,832 Operating Costs Per $83.23 $80.73 $88.99 $93.35 $98.42 Revenue Hour Recent Trends: The trend since early 2015 and especially in 2016 and 2017 has been downward for ridership as gas prices and car ownership costs have remained relatively low and the economy continues to create more jobs leading to more people opting to purchase cars and lesser use of transit. FY18 saw the following service improvements: • In August 2017: o Implemented new RapidLink Gold Line (Route 101) service during peak periods weekdays linking Corona, downtown Riverside and University of California, Riverside (UCR). • In January 2018: o Improved Route 19 frequency between Perris and Moreno Valley to every 15 minutes (up from every 30 minutes) daytime weekdays. o Improved weekdays and weekend frequencies on routes 29 and 49 linking Eastvale, Jurupa Valley, and Riverside. Also service was extended to Amazon Eastvale (routes 3 and 29). o Implemented new CommuterLink Route 200 linking San Bernardino, Riverside, Village at Orange, and the Disneyland Resort in Anaheim seven days a week utilizing the new State Route (SR)-91 intercounty express lanes (expanded from former Route 216). o Implemented new CommuterLink Route 205 peak periods weekdays linking Temecula, Lake Elsinore, Corona, and Village at Orange utilizing the new SR-91 intercounty express lanes. • Riverside Festival of Lights special Route 54F shuttle. Proposed Service Changes for FY2019: The FY19 service plan includes the following service changes: • Route 22 will be split into two separate routes to improve reliability and connectivity at Perris: o Route 22 (Perris — Riverside Downtown). o New Route 9 (Lake Elsinore — Perris). • Route 24 weekdays service frequency will be improved from every 80 to 60 minutes and the Temecula Library deviation will be discontinued due to low ridership. • Route 27 will be split into two separate routes to improve reliability and connectivity at Perris: o Route 27 (Perris — Galleria at Tyler mall in Riverside) — improved frequency from 60 minutes to 40 minutes. o Route 28 (Hemet — Perris) — improved frequency from 60 minutes to 30 minutes. o Route 61 - extend from Sun City (Menifee) to Perris in place of existing Route 27 o Route 212 would be discontinued to avoid unnecessary duplication of service with new Route 28. • Route 31 from Moreno Valley to Beaumont and Hemet will have its last weekdays evening departure approximately an hour later. • Route 33 will have service weekdays expanded to serve Tahquitz High School in Hemet. • Route 40 will be streamlined and expanded to serve more of the City of Menifee, including Mount FYI 7/18 Ridership estimate is based on the budget. San Jacinto College (MSJC) Menifee Campus, the Heritage Lakes area, and McCall Blvd east of the I- 215 freeway. • Route 200 will have additional trips added at peak times weekdays in response to high ridership on selected existing trips. • Routes 205/206: RTA will work to add a stop in the Indian Truck Trail / 1-15 Freeway area of Temescal Valley. • RapidLink Gold Line will have its hours of service rearranged based on ridership demand. • A comprehensive revision of weekend service in the south and eastern areas of RTA's service area will for the first time provide seven day service on all RTA local routes (excluding special weekday shuttle routes 26, 50, 51, 52, 54, and 55). • Riverside Festival of Lights special Route 54F shuttle. Operating Budget ($87,666,909): • Increase of 7% over FY18 budget. Variance analysis by cost element is provided below: o Salaries — 6% increase due to headcount growth from service increases and administrative need. o Purchased Transportation — 10% increase due to contracted rates and fuel. o Benefits — 5% increase due to medical, pension and OPEB cost growth. o Services — 14% increase due to mobile ticketing implementation and increased security costs. o Materials & Supplies — 4% increase due to parts expense. Capital Budget ($36,092,951): • RTA's 3-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is updated to reflect the current economic outlook and service needs with a focus on items which are mandatory to support our current service offering while positioning the Agency future operations. FY18 CIP projects are funded with Federal Sections 5307 and 5339, State Transit Assistance (STA), and new SB1 SGR funds. A summary by project element for FY 2018 is shown below: o Revenue Vehicles - $20.2 million for (14) heavy-duty CNG, (39) Contracted Fixed Route, and (29) DAR vehicles o Non -Revenue Vehicles - $.3 million for (8) cars and (1) truck o Hemet Mobility Hub - $2.6 million o Central Operations & Maintenance Facility - $8.0 million o Facility Maintenance - $2.6 million for operations and facilities maintenance projects o Other - $2.2 million for tire lease and software o Associated Transit Improvements - $.2 million for bus stop enhancements. Table 913 - Fare Revenue Calculation (consistent with Commission Farebox Recovery Policy) Revenue Sources included in Farebox Calculation Actual Amount fromFY 2016/17 Audit FY 17/18 Budget FY 18/19 (Plan) 1. Passenger Fares 10,356,851 9,800,000 10,802,010 2.Interest - - - 3. General Fund Supplement - - - 4. Measure A 2,841,324 3,260,975 5,633,457 5. Advertising Revenue 18,274 15,000 15,000 6. Gain on Sale of Capital Assets 4,034 7. CNG Revenue 179,230 150,000 100,000 8. Lease/ Other Revenue 62,109 63,970 65,840 9. Federal Excise Tax Refund - - - 10. Investment Income 196,332 100,000 300,000 11. CalPers CERBT - - - 12. Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes (50,435) - - 13. Other Revenues 931,087 1,502,601 2,874,453 TOTAL REVENUE for Farebox Calculation (1-13) 14,538,806 14,892,546 19,790,760 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES for Farebox Calculation 70,437,592 81,598,830 87,666,909 FAREBOX RECOVERY RATIO 20.64% 18.25% 22.57% Table 10 Riverside Transit Agency FY 2019 - 2023 TUMF Expenditure Plan Fiscal Year Prior Years Expenditures FY 17-18 Expenditures through 6/30 (estimate) FY 18-19 FY 19-20 FY 20-21 FY 21-22 FY22-23 Current Programmed Phase Balance Total Programmed Payments/Exp Original Programmed Phase Cost Forecast Revenues' Estimated Carryover (as of 6/30) $ 873,052 $ 15,261,216 $ $ 900,000 14,846,038 $ 900,000 $ 7,673,234 $ 900,000 $ 2,191,426 $ 900,000 $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ 19,734,268 $ 1,460,711 $ 50,855,605 Available Revenues Funded Expenditures Phase Project Amount $ 16,134,268 $ 15,746,038 $ 8,573,234 $ 3,091,426 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 RTA-0001 Hemet Mobility Hub ALL $4,275,988 $92,709 $ 71,322 $ 1,876,431 $ 1,500,000 $ 735,526 $ - $ - $ 4,111,957 $ (164,031) $ 4,275,988 RTA-0002 UCR Mobility Hub ALL $5,445,000 $0 $ 138,000 $ 3,660,642 $ 1,646,358 $ - $ $ $ 5,307,000 $ (138,000) $ 5,445,000 RTA-0003 Promenade Mobility Hub ALL $1,692,797 $978 $ 734,774 $ 957,045 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 957,045 $ (735,752) $ 1,692,797 RTA-0004 Associated Transit Enhancements Program ENH $1,940,437 $133,390 $ 162,709 $ 515,000 $ 415,450 $ 315,400 $ 135,670 $ 262,818 $ 1,644,338 $ (296,099) $ 1,940,437 RTA-0005 Long Range Planning ENH $600,000 $293,967 $ 161,314 $ 88,686 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 16,033 $ - $ 144,719 $ (455,281) $ 600,000 RTA-0006 Riveside Metrolink Station ENH ENH $75,000 $0 $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ $ 75,000 RTA-0007 Vine Street Mobility Hub ALL $3,886,905 $0 $ - $ 500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 886,905 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 3,886,905 $ - $ 3,886,905 RTA-0008 Rapid Link Gold Line ALL $988,478 $939,667 $ 20,112 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (959,779) $ 959,779 RTA-0009 Rapid Link Blue Line ENH $1,500,000 $0 $ - $ 200,000 $ 800,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 RTA-0010 Regional Operations & Maintenance Facility3 ALL $30,251,000 $0 $ $ - $ 500,000 $ 633,595 $ 248,297 $ 137,182 $ 1,519,074 $ $ 1,519,074 RTA-0011 San Jacinto Mobility Hub ALL $200,000 $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ 200,000 Total Programmed Capital Improvements $ 19,346,038 $ (2,748,942) $ 22,094,980 Annual Capital Funded Expenditure $50,855,605 $2,460,711 $ 1,288,230 $ 8,072,804 $ 6,381,808 $ 3,091,426 $ 900,000 $ 900,000 Projected Funded Balance carryover $ 24,846,038 $ 7,673,234 $ 2,292,426 $ - $ - $ - Notes: 1) Revenue increase to 3% for RTA due to Nexus Study, assume flat revenue for FY20 through FY22. 2) Project amount increased to maximum TUMFshore due to increased construction costs and projected revenues. 3) Project added from approved 2016 TUMF Nexus Study and will cost more than max TUMFshore. 4) Project added from approved 2016 TUMF Nexus Study, starting with Initial Project cost is for PA&ED. APPENDIX A: RTA SYSTEM MAP AND FIXED -ROUTE MAPS Route20oto 11 10 0 San Bernardino w PROSPECT Route 204 continues to Transit Center o z Montclair Transit Center. LomaLinda University z o OLoma Linda VA Hospital Medical Center E IF O N T A R I O 1 JURUPA 215MARLAY BARTON- LOMA i*iAFMAP LINDA• •SCALE CHERRY v � GRAND Country W tt!W TERRACE Welcome aboard the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA), your community transportation provider. The RTA operates 46 bus routes to IS, °N Villa e Blpo g o GRANITE HILLS w °qq CF NFq ATF q CENTER provide you with safe, cost -effective and reliable service in western Riverside County. We hope that this System Map is useful to " �� o} 24TH A/AMO 2�, 2Q 3 H I G H G R O V E you in planning your trip. Should you need additional information, please call the Customer Information Center at (951) 565-5002. MISSION BLVD moo° o�� v � Q s Hunter Park d tt J U R U PA !`O 2 �j%Bq LB DUG METROLONIK k Station I 7TTr Route Number Alternate Routing O Transfer Point 0 State Highway VALLEY 41 N° gpSSFt 13 52 Metrolink \URUPA a TWIT°y STZ SPRU N Route Path O Point of Interest ICI' Metrolink Station Main Road ' The Me�o nek CANTU-GALLEANO RANCH Amazon o -Eastvale ¢ o Station �Q, s SEE DOWNTOWN 3q0 � RTA 3RDS 8 BLAINE NDEN. <A z UCR Commuter Routing Q Medical Facility Interstate Water M I R A L O M A za Gold Line 1 n tz o N\`E a METROLINK \Mo jEgygcrq DETAIL M�Ua „ _'BIGSPRINGS 16 51 52 GOODMAIMONITE LIMONITE r. ' ggy10N ' grH UNIVERSITY MILK 204 OLD LAKE RD RpNCN tM01 A�9 1 1 • • O 2018 •Agency.1 N 68THST z G C 9y e , . GG� ' o2 g oo , MLKING 215 ' z S�"`` P\ : f ola _ o IURUPA m Q o 26 31 Sunlinezzo 208 210 MANZANITA _ 10 ' N I N G E A S T V A LSE w x b s CENTRAL �r o MORENO B E A U M O N T 15 ARLINGTON G�yo CENTRALG w t , TRAL ''�oyF 'M,01SSE 2 IRONWOOD VALLEY LZI ' Crty STAGECOACH CITRUS Q 'z ARLINGTON k d Broc ARLINGTON nArcade ARLINGTON BOX SPRINGS CANYON LOCHMO Moreno; a HEMLOCK a 'Valley ' I o , Hall 10 Sunline220continues z fAIUNNE r� OR C REST 1: o Mall : SUNNYMEAD ' w = 2ND to Palm Desert Walmart V 6th ° cAVeU CENTERPOIN- J z m FIRS ¢ �m EUCALYPTUS GOULD,) �0 o9F �° °���P ���• n N TOWNGATE ¢ d EUCALYPTUS ^ Walmart 1ST ¢ o\�p���SC 1 1 Q\P�P glF q�D AEU LYPTUS TOWNGATE a COTTONWOOD Y a o c 131 Norco City Hall County COUNTY �yP°�� y Ment0IFARM O rAIDUNE oo�� � 90 2 1: z ALESSANDRO 20 41 W o z 4TH 9 ealth a prkview ALESSANDRO z ' Riverside _ Norco V N O R C O 9G F� Galleria o Haspi 1 METROLINK 1 m ty m Senior Center 9s ! 1 (MISSION Hall o nMedica z o r �E�o� at Tyler Moreno Valley a w ROUTE 51 Crest Cruiser SPro LAMPTON La Sierra .Q NOLE GROVE 1 Cente Moreno ce Norco W March Fie d CACTUS z - Valleyst. University v Social Metrolink Station College 3RD Boarding diagram Page 31 Kaiser A = Security o MEYER-JFK W CACTUS Commuity METROLINK Gold Line 1 3 205 �, �y Hos oG Y Office Pow JFK tX Hospital 9 206 Corona Cruiser Blue, Red Fyc �F9y P \PAP ' 9Fy RIVERSIDE MARCH J P A 92A ARB GENTIAN J 1 14 16 51 52 Q d �?o Metrolink A� �ORANGETERRACE z 1 m os IRIS 3 Gr O z c „ La Sierra P\S Moreno i 90 HIDDEN VALLEY F�F Metrolink �� 20 26 t Metrolink z IR111 \ \ Apartments Valleyo Village Towers 10 14 51 Station dP� 0 a College • P University «Route urn to m « COMMERCE Corona °�\P Fy�� METROLINK z Village 52 Blaine c 2 Anaheim >; Corona z Transit \p «Route 205to 3� City Hall Center.' a°� High YRPM�� Village at Orange POMONA �FAND Boarding diagram Page 32 VAN BUREN School Universitygv `c y " Gold Line 1 10 12 215 18 19 20 Al UCR s a 7 Liles to 1. HOME 13 1a 1s 21 27 W O O D C R E S T Q Unrversitygv South o 6TH ST South Coast Metro 6THST GOIDINE GARDENS 200 MARIPOSA - o o, Post office ucR :. d z 0 a OLEANDER d z r Gold Line 1 C O R Cy , . IOTH �g9�h9 Q Citrus Hills k w FAIRGROUND PERRIS 16 s1 204 52 Corona Reggional Medical Vintage Terrace e High School Y RAMONA EXPWY Center Senior Community • v - c �q� Oyq Crest Dr. MIKBIvd 15 .� CAIALCO star nest c on Community • G CAJALCO z OAKLAND MORGAN MAY RANCH �p Vassar Mtye 215 rvd ChurchParkandRide o W - Mead Valley RIDER _ m RIDER i Library' Q "I"MI PIT Mead Valley o m z CAJALCO Communi MEAD Center ty WALNUT 16 51 208 210 212 9q 31 32 74 212 217 ' r9y`olq! VALLEY G d ' o SunLine220 0 ti �iogF�A N Dos Lagos ORANGE q - RIVERSIDE Mant,V;s Mt. San Jacinto College 9q «DOSLAGOS CITRUSAVE A " to SAN 2jOLgyA� Fp NUFVO r,�ooE JACINTO TEMESCAL CANYON,, 22 51 City OFq�NgBlL° Tom' Farms WESTON t2 Ha11MAIN COTTONWOOD ENTERoPR q SAN JACINT » 19 22 27 30 74 C en tra/qv E7THSoboba v 208 212 Metrolink 16 51 d Q� W7i¢H Casino z SAN JACINTO o 4TH ST �CQss�tio EVANS N tt a TTH g, G p 1 z z ESP ANADE 9gll°� o FRUITVALE 94cIP� ELLIS 11TH o 2 O TransferPointandlnformation Z MM WEALT � 15 ELL! S 215 O Trolley Stops Canyon Crest 27 31 32 33 42 o MENLO MENLO z Walmart T E M E S C A L BONN�EDR Towne Centre LZLL79 L112 217 CANYON South Perris sF9p OAKLAND a z PALM OAKLAND o z NFLORIDA Metrolink5tation DEVONSHIRE» m LA MDEVONSHIR LATH " • METROLINK EXCEED F�°RSOP z z VALLE L6461 74 208 Metrolink HemetCENTRAL Mill o ¢ VISTA MAYBERR ,• ETHANACRD z Valley N MATTHEWS o Mall z- MAYBERRY DOWNTOWN RIVERSIDE DETAIL MEADOWBROOK m ¢ G n -STETSON 3D TETSON o CHAMBERS AVE S UN THIRD ST • • • • • • • • . C I T Y T HORNTO THORNTON THORNTON r 27 40 61 74 MCCALL o z MUSTANG EAST 15 = ^- W SIMPSON HEMET HEMET QUAIL WINCHESTER Outlet Center 1 VALLEY XXX FOURTH ST Convention 8 22 205 206 w Fire Q z Center �QP� ��o Station m DOME91GONIFOY \`�05 `OlOF' LAKE 9 MtyHaR M E N I F E E `L �y`°sy E L S I N O R E C A N Y O N c°F� NEWPORT RD LL �� o9F °!!�� LAKE NEWPORT RD m Q P�t�oo tS�S�S\OLEUSD ' in LA PIEDRA RD PIEDRA F- z!/yoOly RAILROADCYNRD ROHRABACHER» FIFTH ST 0 ®I F�9G` �oQ PONFRY 9rFsm GggHA city sG� Canyon Lake o City Hall Mt. nlacinto Co ge-Menifee ,tee �Qo�oQo Q M �'sJjp RAILROAD v ys ` CVN RD U_ `" Z "T r FRENCH VALLEY - " i N �KESHOREDR�i! almart o W OC z , SKYVIEW SIXTH ST t/1 z to w I1 «ALGRAVE Q O L.0 m 6 w 2 Zi O Fox Performing AtC t THOMPSON ,, BENTON r s en er W 91 c99yp Q Co ORnoos ROUTE 55 Temecula Trolley MISSION INN AV ��® 1 1 °�! y p�O RUSTICGLENDR 15 VON e ^Mission BUNU�CAN KELLER N „ ice A Trail / c" AULD Southwest H , a Library Center y'.p� ysabel ' o = ��0 Barnett N ® I II z ` � o TDWNSHIPRD tJ ® I 1 1 oq �y` `DLoma Linda University ccy 0c O V®® I N I lO99g9 oQo� Medical Center Q Q Q \� ®' I I I ■ R I IIII� ®®OLD LINE • • . �ygya �Pfi °�, �FlT o WwrfyHm�r MURRIETA 3 " «LINNEL ` HARVEST ' ��,� (ha arral �'ZCp 5K �t qo ti w y i i I I I■ I 1� 1 ! 9, �� y Fj h' Inland Valle CLINTON KEITH Brockton & 14th 14EB �5 9ti�Fy K Medical Center af�!_ Brockton & 14th 14WB ��Q PRIELIPP �9r ° French , RVESjON� H a UNIVERSITY AV ot�� Vist ieta Airport 23 24 55 61 HA to I I ®I Brockton & 10th 14W6 9 o��� 79 217LU o QUITV I, Brockton & University 14WBtyH;TFwO w DR NINTH ST University & Brockton 14EB,22NB/SB W I L D O M A R o !iygNfpr4 °S °p } 061.i o '- • Mission Inn &Brockton 49EB 0�°�yya� 15 V rOIN P�Q�So y" TECHNOLOGY 15 White Park ® to ® Mission Inn &Brockton 49WB �� fry M xiooG o Hall r r I ®� 91 Z I I Magnolia & 14th 1WB, 13WB, 15WB, 50W6 yq` ycTOy �y�� �¢� Med alSe tern The Promenade III Magnolia & 15th 1 EB,13EB,15EB, 50EB MURRIETA Y TENTH ST > ® 9 � ,�Q� .• �qo, 1. HOTSPRIN . ��� �Oy MURRIETA W 73 24 55 at TPllleallp ® Market & 12th 1WB,13WB,15WB Murrie a OT SPRINGS Court r E OTHall A 61 79 217 house Detention 11 �� II II Market&12th IEB,13EB,15EB Cnteerot .' Walmart p 3 Palm Plaza Center I® III Market& 12th Gold Line EB y Shopping Center > I 11' Market&IIth Gold Line 23 202 205 206 Q 1 , I Extended Stay OVERLAND DR a ^ i z ELEVENTH ST Hall of 3 0 ® ®Market&loth 1WB,13W6,15WB I : ,; FQuiryD America O N I Justice c 'Z^ ' ®I Market & IOth 13EB,15EB 23 24 55 61 W �q� TEM. Best M Z R 55 79 202 205 206 208 a 11�� 79 217 ' =Abbott 217 Y p t s 11 ® Market&University 12EB,204NB Western P V Z County 1 1 EE Lemon & University 10EB, 208NB/SB,210EB/WB, Promenade Mall oOc O I' Cente Istration , ® ®I Market & 6th 1ZW6, 29EB 212EB/WB, 200EB/WB , m Q , ''I o o Market & 6th 12EB, 29WB ®I University & Lemon Gold Line WB,1WB 9 24 55 61 ' 55 79 202 205' 206 208 15 yNFl9p 3 a 1 I 1 Market & 4th 12WB I I Inside Metrolink Station 29WB, 49WB, 54CW S 00- 217 �° TWELFTH ST _ Market&3rd 12EB,29W6 Board atBayG 15 o Mpg°PR�tP 0 TransferPointandlnformation � o I® Inside Metrolink Station 1 EB/W6,15W6 ��a ti rrolle sto s T E M E C U L A r ® University & Market 1 EB,12WB,13EB,14EB,15EB, 0 v P I Q Q � Board at Bay H �o 22SB, 29EB, 49EB, 54CW, 204SB 10 University & Market 1WB, 13WB, 14WB, 15WB, I'Vine & Board aMeetaroliinnk Station 29EB/WB, 49EB/WB Temecu Hall I p `P�� RANCNOV\SSA c f� Cit 27NB, 29WB, 49WB y THIRTEENTH ST 91 ®I Orange & 12th 10W6,12WB,13EB, 50W6 ® Vine & Metrolink Station 15EB/WB 9� Board at Bay C 90 90 1 1 0 Orange & 1oth 10WB, 12WB, 13EB N ' I Orange & University 1OWB,12WB,13EB Vine & Metrolink Station 200EB/WB Temecula Z Board at Bay F ' Q 1B Main & 10th 50EB/WB I Vine &Metrolink Station Omnitrans 215 OLD TOWN F��A �oyT Hospi al aSEMENEApKw ® G Temecula Walmart ® ' I 14th & Orange Grove 10WB,12WB,13EB Board at Bay E ✓o� �5 �yo� oNEtl\AWo FOURTEENTH ST Lemon & 14th 10EB,12EB,13WB, 54CW, RM Vine & Metrolink Station 208NB/SB, 710EB/WB, oy99 qq°gq/lggo f� 208NB/SB, 210EB/WB, Board at Bay A 212EB/WB Community R E D H A W K GOLD LINE ® 212EB/WBEM Center Vine&Metrolink Station 1EB/WB AF 9Fo Riverside ' i Lemon & 12th I OEB, 12EB, 13WB, 54CW, Board at Bay B `ygtic A�ry;9_ Community > 200EBMB 208NB/SB,210EB/WB, qAY PEPPERCORN» HospitalQ I'I ® 91 LEGEND 212EB/WB EM Market &4th 29EB O FIFTEENTH ST „�j Route NumbersZi H Stop Location Number I I University &Lemon Gold Line EB,1 EB,14EB,15EB, ® Oth & Maio h 54CW Rt 202 continues 15 PResor9a oSGreat0akH5 Z 1 1 NB=Northbound I SB=Southbound 22SB,29EB,49EB,54CW,204SB, Q EB=Eastbound I WB=Westbound Omnitrans215 I® Inside Metrolink Station 208NB/SB, 210EB/WB, 212EB/WB, to Oceanside Rt 217 continues < CW=Clockwise I I University & Lemon I OWB, 14WB, 12EB, 15WB, Board at Bay I SunLine 220EB/WB to Escondido Transit Center 221113, 29WB, 49WB, 204NB ® 14th & Lime IOEB,13WB, 54CW Information Cen RapidLink Gold Line (951)565-5 02 ter Corona - Magnolia Ave - UCR RiversideTransit.com RTABus.com Routing and timetables No service on weekends or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, subject to change. Christmas Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. • . Gold Line 1 Gold Line 1 OGold Line 1 10 12 13 14 22 ZO 51 52 14 15 22 29 49 • • • • • • • . linden 54 200 204 208 210 0 91 m 212 Omnitrans 215 Mis Q Sion Inn Ave '. '. � 3 •• a Legend I Map not to scale llth St' I 0 Stop Location 12thSt NOTE: RapidLink buses serve these stops only. 14th St Hours of Service: Riverside BUSES DEPART EVERY 15 MINUTES. (ammunHosital p Monday — Friday only. 5:30-8:30 a.m. and 2:30-5:30 p.m. CentmlM.s. Marcy Library Ramona , H.S. esarchavez unlversis-UCR Community '• Y Center Riverside City College Riverside Central Ave Plaza Arlington Ave Ada Madisonst RIVERSIDE M,St � Van Bur Parkview en BIVdCommuniry Hospitall Boarding diagram I Page 28 m Gold Line 1 10 12 �o�ePve a 13 14 15 21 27 200 Ga la sierra Ave i Boarding diagram I Page 27 Gold Line 1 3 205 206 Corona Cruiser Blue, Red Metro link—] .n Baptist University ChemawaM.S. Sherman Indian H.S. Arlington Library at Tyler YYerst 91 Kaiser Medical Center Gold Line 1 15 T Iowa at University Gold Line 1 Corona Cruiser Blue k1legasM.s. CORONA McKinley St Home Gardens Library �a�nst Gold Line 1 Corona Cruiser Blue, Red 32 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Gold Line 1 14 1 10 14 51 52 OGold Line 1 10 12 16 51 52 204 14 15 22 29 49 Adst • Blainest 54 200 204 208 210 212 Omnitrans 215 Mis a Q o slog inn Ave m Olive rsityAve 1 12 13 14 15 University Village 22 29 49 54 204 TJ* th Downtown Boarding diagram I Page 31 Metrolink 1 15 29 49 54 200 208 210 212 Omnitrans215 Metrolink Amtrak 14thSt SunLine220 Riverside Community Hospital E 1 13 15" CentralMS. I Central Ave - Marcy Library 1 1 10 14 1 151 Ramona / H.S. RIVERSIDE Adamsst "n BUreq R, Parkview Boarding diagram I Page 28 Gold Line 1 1 10 12 13 14 15 21 27 200 Board7(.ronaC,,,,,erBI.e7,Rd Gold 206 Metrolink West Corona Metrolink Station . Pa`\t0aa SmithAv i e LAutor 34I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Corona Park- And-Rideil OeP,4e UCR Riverside - '. Gold Line 1 Downtown Metrolink Station 204 Riverside 'ity College Gold Line 1 Riverside Plaza 13 1 14 22 iArpngton Ave RTA and Corona Cruiser honor each other's Day and 30-Day passes at shared Madisopst stops. OG IlamiaLegend Baptist Map , , scale v Unlverslry O Time and/or Transfer Point i ChemawaM.S. Shermanlndian H.S. O Transfer Point and Information Arlington Library � Alternate Routing Galleria ® Long-term Detour Routing at Tyler TYlerSt Kaiser Gold Line 1 1 1 15 Medical (enter[asierraAve 91 Gold Line 1 ' Corona Cruiser Blue ' VillegasM.S. McKinley St C O R O N A Home Gardens Library Corona City Hall yhJdY�� , t i%' Gold Line 1 )' . Corona Cruiser Blue, Red 1 I Corona Cruiser Red Eastvale - Norco - Corona Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject todrange. Rutas y horarios son Day and New Year's Day. sujetos a cambios. Cantu-Galleano Ranch O P3 29 OWayE A S T V A L E Eastvale Gateway «Limonite Ave VernolaMorketplace s 3 29 Harada Heritage Park 68th St d River HeightsLS. d Eleanor = 15 Roosevelt H.S. v Citrus St `° Norco Library 6th St N 0 R C 0 5th St ODMV Post D(hce DPSS Legend Map not to scale �oC or(o 4thSt Q Time and/orTransferPoint Norco City© o O Transfer Point and Information Hall «Lampton Ln 3rd St ® Weekdays Only Norco IO College 3rd St 2nd St North Main Plaza RTA and Corona Cruiser honor each © other's Day and 30-Day passes at shared 3 Corona Cruiser Blue stops. Corona Transit Center Boarding diagram � Page 27 1 3 g\oi1 W. Grand Corona Park- O O6d Corona Cruiser Blue, Red ; And -Ride Metrolink Corona 15 Library Mall 6th St oo�aP,e 8th St 1 3 Corona C 0 R 0 N A Regional Corona ©. 1Oth St Medical Senior Center i Center ' ......... ' Ontario Ave 3 1 orona Cruiser Blue, Red 42 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Routing and timetables subjectto change. Rutas designadas y horanos son sujetos a cambios. O, N Lake Elsinore - Wildomar Loop Routes Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year's Day. Lake Elsinore Outlet Center `s6 0 as°S� ~P� fair Lakeside H.S. Lakeside ' Library 74 Ortega Hwy Baldwin Blvd T Outlet Center nns 15 y 0 \Pl Chase J Bank LAKE E L S I N 0 R E\,Lllel,ndVillage M.S. jkl a°o (off- Mission Legend I Map not to scale t Time and/orTransfer Point T Transfer Point and Information �o ldkPsf ho rL.O" N Railroad Canyon Rd d O Walmart Oo Served first before Canyon Estate Dr loop OMa\a9a�a 8 40 0 H/ WILDOMAR v" B M M.S. 461 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Big Springs & Watkins - Downtown Riverside - Galleria at Tvler Information Center (951)565-5002 RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. I 1 10 14 Pr��°9 5� Q�A� 51 52 i Gold Line 1 10 12 �q` 215 e SO y1a�`Q 14 15 22 29 49 54 200 204 208 210 5� Riverside 212 Omnitrans215 3`a Sports DCR Complex F H.S.North �'fdyAf RTA �hd9 H.S. 215 Fox Theater '' ' Mjs51ontnppve �� 10 12 13 54 200 Univetstty Ave 208 210 212 10thSt ® o r r 14thst 3 O lg yCoa9eSt 10' 12 13 Riverside d City c College 91 Pol h. �e u �P H.S. ti�a g RiI ae`Q� Target 1 10 14 15 a e�„yygOnly Brockton \ P% tre caresrn. Arcade Cas a f°r°e°f o MareDam Library H.Se Library Library Gage M.S. Madison St 7.7 rferPoint Information gton 'J/ on St H.S. �f RIVERSIDE Van Buren Drive-in Boarding diagram I Page 28 ¢ nBureng7vd Gold Line 1 1 10 12 m Arlington Library 0 13 14 15 1 21 27 200 0 Galleria at Tyler 50 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Moreno Valley Mall - March ARB Innn Rnuta Information Center (951)565-5002 RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subjectto change. Da and New Year's Da. Rutasyhorariosson Y Y sujetos a cambios. I Boarding diagram I Page 29 Ironwood Ave «Counter -clockwise Clockwise» 11 16 18 1 19 126 31 1208 1 210 ISunLine220 Hemlock Ave Moreno O� Cehterpolntpr a O Post Office _ Valley Mall ti &„ 9 KaiserMediral0ffices Sunnymead Blvd Towngate Blvd Sunnymead Eucalyptus Ave Ms. 11 19 as MORENO - V A L L E Y v Moreno 11 18 a ualleffs. Cottonwood Ave RiversideCaunty Superior Court 11 20 Alessandro Blvd City Nall 11 20 Cactus Ave z, Badger Springs March M.S. ARB A Meyer Dr O 1FK Dr «Clockwise I Counter -clockwise)) 7 Fand/orTransfer Point fer Point and Information 541 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY iRrreter.�!t�a� La Cadena & Stephens - Downtown Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Rutas y horanos son Day and New Year's Day. sujetos a cambios. _ Ruth Lewis s Community N Center/Reid Park N \Center St � awlA Interchange `L Gold Line 1 ' 10 12 Alamo St o td 14 15 22 29 49 Columbia a a 54 200 204 208 210 ® Russell St K 212 Omnitrans215 0 lstst Rom 1 12 13 14 15 salvation 22 29 49 54 204 Army Fox: • .Theater Univ. Ave 10 12 13 ..... Riverside County l Oth 5t c(DoAdministrative i&Mrn Cnter 10 12 13 54 200 �tiverside v 'JIZh 208 210 212 ........ . , Hall oflustice , J Riverside City College»lurupa Ave 12 15 Arlin ton Ave Janet 9 N GoeskeCtr. F/rl 12 21 © 6Pr� �e s o�aP • `a�\tiat e. my Riverside Me Mental Health O 91 1 12 13 ' 14 15 Countyy d Juvenile La Sierra Farm Rd Hall 20 University �¢ r HOleAve lyre , . diin ©� �f Boarding diagram Page 28 Gold Line 1 10 12 Gall ria at Tyler 13 1 14 15 21 27 Kaiser Hospital 200 91 O Time and/orTransferPoint A. �O`� ' • O Transfer Point and Information Pr�Or `�,¢�OpOr m Alternate Routing 58 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Hunter Park Metrolink Station - Downtown Riverside - Galleria at Tyler Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. DdyandNewYedr'sDdy. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. ,O ti r v9rO Hunter Park 13 52 Metrolink s M*d� 9 MeholinkStation � " � tv�eS Spve Westbound--• •� �S oSe 13 1 14 51 52 ^ Eastbound Gold Line 1 ds ' RTA John 13 1 14 22 " North H.S. 1 r 3taS< . • Post 10 12 13 .. o - et5`1111 e tibrO 9orfire �'•d?,3�, �°`° gay 9 Stratton 1 12 13 14 15 Community loth 5t 22 29 49 54 204 Rivery Riverside Center CtyHall •© County ' • Riverside Administrative ; dh,T,Fn7-n.aII11 Community Center 1 13 15 Hospital O Riverside Centraim.s. City College 0 Riverside 1 ' 13 15 50 Plaza RIVERSIDE `e"<`a<� Sierra M.I. 10 1 12 1 13 54 200 208 1210 1212 T Arlington & Monroe T Norte Vista H.S. Pie n Walmart �I o�ta Ps�9 Q,e 6 St GP�¢S W IMS. 13 15 62 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY a°P,e a Legend I Map not to scale OTime and/or Transfer Point y1 13 1 21 O Transfer Point and Information 7 ® Alternate Routing 9� a oP55 Boarding diagram I Page 28 o� Galleria Gold Line 1 10 12 �a5 13 14 15 21 1 27 at Tyler 200 Galleria at Tyler - Downtown Riverside - Loma Linda VA Hospital Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. DayandNewYear'sDay. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. AL Ommitrans Route 325 serves Michigan Ave and Barton Rd. \ I 14 Omnitrans 2,19, 325, SBX SP � i�4f11'Rffll!I 13 - 14 22 1 12 13 14 15 22 29 49 54 204 OniversitYAvnI4!_ ' . � Loma into University A a �dC11pR Loma Linda Hospital 00 UniversityHospital L0MA•L•INDA v G R A N D TERRACE H I G H G R 0 V E 14 Omnitrans325 w � 3saSdg`ast`e5` © University 1 10 14 village 51�Ml 52 Riversid V Cesar Chavez , Q Community community Center 14 22 o Hospital c DMV Gold Line , 1 10 12 m %W a Riverside Plaza 14 15 22 29 49 4 54 200 204 208 210 © g 212 Omnitrans 215 Californiasrhool • Riverside B,a fortheDeof . . Medical all Gold Line 1 14 1 71 14 15 © Madison St 16 1 51 52 204 RIVERSIDE c�Q r r \c 0 Galleria Time and/or Transfer Point at Tyler Boarding diagram I Page 28 O Transfer Point and Information Orft Gold Line 1 1 1 10 12 13 14 1 15 1 21 27 200 661 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY ZDow.nt:own Riverside -Merced & Information Center (951)565-5002 RiversideTransit.com RTABus.com Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horarios son %jetos a cambios. Gold Line 1 10 12 MET9, O 54 200 204 208 10 p�v pve Riversidee--K 212 Omnitran5215 Riverside Downtown • d CityHall I Metrolink A Station 1 12 13 14 15 22 29 49 54 004 • • Riverside , Riverside CommunityO City College r , , Hospital d Central Boarding diagram Page 31 1 15 1 13 15 1 50 29 1 49 1 54 200 208 210 212 v Omnitrans215 Metrolink Amtrak SunLine 220 Riverside 15 MPlaza 1 10 14 arry Library RIVERSIDE ....Q...41 G ° G 13 15 �e Arlin ton as OTime and/orTransferPoint ReP,iversiO q OTransfer Point and Information RAipo°e'. P�so9 Square erm W1. R. TINT cm Alternate Routing O 12 15 Norte Vista 9a H.S.ITIrm �s PCCso9�0�Pve ` �`/°ir o¢ oaP © Loma Vista �o GiP M.S. La Sierra Hole Ave Galleria at Senior Center Tyler La Sierra © . University O 12 15 Tye lds' La sierra Q Boarding diagram Page 28 L A Prd9`P H.S. �P Gold Line 1 1 10 12 SIERRA aa 9O a°c 13 14 15 21 27 Kaiser �c 200 Hospital .. Arizona Gold Line 1 I 15 © Ms *161 La Sierra 15 200 OCTA 794 p a� Metrolink 91 �P,�Ps�l O Station Hivaest H s. 70 I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Moreno Valley Mall to UCR Information Center (951)565-5002 RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Day and New Year's Day. Was y horarios son sujetos a cambios. 71�O 18 19 26 ��CI 210 SunLine 220 Legend I Map not to scale t Time and/orTransfer Point T Transfer Point T 204 tc Gold Line 1 �51 ® T University at University Village Om® 0 UCR CANYON M 0 R E N 0 VALLEY 4WAE T Canyon Crest Towne Center ZC C G . • • • • • Gold Line 1 14 16 51 52 204 RIVERSIDE Moreno Valley Mall 60 DAY ST Canyon Springs g Plaza Target d ` C O V 215 VNBIVD r � 1E6 16EB • Bannockburn Village s — m ns Mobil _ Gas Station IOWA AVE 761 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Sunnymead Ranch - Moreno Valley Mall - Moreno Valley College Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Day a n d N ew Yea r's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O S U N N Y M E A D Boarding diagram I Page 29 R A N C H 11 16 18 19 126 31 208 210 SunLine 220 Sunnymead Ranch Pkwy _ NBONLY )) • ¢ o ROK Manzanita Ave d Vista Heights M.S. x Canyon Springs H.S. Moreno Valley «Centerpoint Dr Morena Mall y© Valley s Towngate Ave H.S. wk Cottonwood Ave Cottonwood Ave 18 19 20 Badger Springs M.S. 11 18 m Vista — JFKDr oelLago a © H.S. 11 18 __ Gentian Ave MORENO Iris Ave,, VALLEY v�O Legend K Moreno Krameria» Valley O Time and/orTransferPoint College O Transfer Point and Information Vista Verde M.S. ® Northbound Only 84 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Moreno Valley Mall to Perris Station Transit Center - Trumble Rd Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. A, O A low° Cir — Aoreno Valley Mall Centerpoint Dr Boarding diagra7�SunLine 11 16 18 31 208 210 Sunnymead Blvd T Sunnymead & Heacock Morch mmMountain i Perris & Alessandro =m t MORENO Alessandro Blvd O VALLEY Badger 7 — Springs m M.S. 18 19 1 20 1 41 aLlrisve Ross/Lowe's/ Starcrest ,19 ' 41 Val Verde Y H.S. v n .1mulalumm Morgan Sty Perris O Time and/or Transfer Point valley Spectrum OTransfer Point and Information a Alternate Routing Orange Ave Walmart Perris 10 Theater 00 19 27 30 — F P E R R I S Perris City Hall E San Jacinto Ave Perris Station 97 Transit Center =Metrolink Krameria Ave Moreno Valley College Penis Fairgrounds Ramona Expy 19 1 41 Kindred Hospital Riverside 0 Nuevo Rd Penis H.S. Jarvis St Trumble Rd at EXCEED W 4th St 215 O 74 88 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Magnolia & Elizabeth - Metrolink - RUMC - Information center g (951)565-5002 111-:— n,.....,.... --4-- ■A-11-1 r-11--- RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Day and NewYear's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Moreno Beach Dr SON O Kaiser Permanente Hncnital Nason St v RUMC - 18 19 20141 20 31 41 MorenLasselle St Moreno School Valley I�1 >� Valley SrhoolDisrrirr peninsulaCt Moreno O QCollege Palley Library Kitchin St'�` Perris Blvd Indian St — V 18 1 19 1 20 r Post Office c 0 a M 0 R E N 0 - rTiN W i 11 20 O Frederick St V A L L E Y Loren" Palley Day Stity Hall 20 26 Metrolink MorenoValley/MarchField Mission Grove Pkwy© Metrolink Station Mission Grove Mission Grove at saa�o�\�a Plaza 0 Social Security o Trautwein Rd P�eS RIVERSIDE 20 22 26 Poly 10 20 H.S. . Victoria Ave Legend I Map not to scale r-i OTime and/or Transfer Point Riverside 1 12 13 14 P� O Transfer Point and Information Plaza —_ 15 20 ® Alternate routing C.(mJ7 Magnolia Ave «Brockton Ave 96I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a carnbios. O Galleria at Tyler to Country Village / Fontana Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year's Day. s ................ Country Village' J U R U P A SanSevainewy VALLEY Ave I© Ave 21 49 Omnitrans82 FONTANA SAN BERNARDIN0 COUNTY ........................... RIVERSIDE COUNTY 21 49 204 Ben Nevis Blvd 60 Mission Blvd G L E N A V 0 N Glen Avon Library a lurupa Valley H.S. WaLoma Jurupa Rd M.S. 21 29 PEDLEY peeley = Metrolink Limonite Ave Station 21 29 Riverside County AnimalConrrol w Arlington Ave Legend I Map not to 0 Time and/or Transfer Point 15 21 12 21 Transfer Point and Information d RIVERSIDE WaImart P� Boarding diagram I Page 28 Gold Line 1 10 12 Mag�oCsaPv 13 14 15 21 27 200 Arlington Library Galleria <.O at Tyler 102 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Downtown Riverside - Perris Station - Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. N 14 22 iLegend Map notto scale 1 12 13 14 15 22 29 49 54 204 0 Timeand/orTransferPoint Missionlnn . • • O Transfer Point and Information Univ. Ave�:l , , • Gold Line 1 10 12 a, d 14 15 22 29 49 Post 54 200 204 208 210 x riverside o Office �ciryHall 212 Omnitrans215 9s Gold Line 1 22 51 doa 13 14 22 R I V E R S I D E o v Alessandro Blvdp�` o* P Mission dGlove Plaza 20 1 22 1 26 Social Sectin �0�fficeej a 22 27 Van Buren» O a Oleander Ave Martin o Mariposa Luther $ NB `a King i SB H.S. MarkhamSt Citrus Hill H.S. .© W 0 0 D C R E S TCIM\ 22 • 41 MEAD VALLEY r . s 22 LAKE �. �Nichols Lake ELSIN0RE Elsinore Outlet 0 Center Meadowbrook Ave c� rf0o a a Cajalco Rd Mead Valley Library Rider St P E R R I S 0 4 Perris Perris CtryHall LmS Station Senior Transit center Center Ellis Ave 4th St ,'Metrolink 4 Boarding diagram Page 30 19 22 27 30 74 208 212 Metrolink 106 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Temecula - Murrieta - Wildomar Information (enter (951)565-5002 RiversideTra nsit.com Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Day a nd New Yea r's Day. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. ki �,W«Central 1 8 1 23 «Catt cWildomar a Q City Hall O� Inland Valley N Medical Center J� O 72 W I L D 0 M A R `a 15 � Murrieta Valley High School Ca\if yaks O Ka\tNaSt O, N M U R R I E T A 23 61 Clinton Keith Rd SQa Vista Murrieta High School a r s HotSprin s 9 Rd Post Office Murrieta 9a City Hall .' °'pa 'ro ' fi Los Alamos Rd O &Senior 9 Center o LI Rancho Springs ,• g, © IfMedical Center Murrieta \%o a0O c 23 202 205 206 1111dlrtldrt Town(enter'Q`��e'� •' �J� Pao 23 9�P 208 0 l � fpr a NkolasRd 23 1 24 1 55 61 �� voJ��a� ��c 79 1 717 Chaparral High School Rancho � Grace MethrumTemecula Community Library 79 Town (enter ' Winchester Rd 23 24 55 Promenade 61 79 217 Mall r• r r r r a a 15 = d OTime and/or Transfer Point ' OTransfer Point and Information I Alternate Routing T E M E C U L A 110I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY County Center - Pechanga Resort - Temecula Vallev Hospital Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. N a F r ' 9pi�Or1 23 1 24 1 55 61 Jc�1� Riverside + 79 217 Grace County I Mellman Assessor ¢� Community �c . • ' Library �cc\� Chaparral HS Q 23 24 55 61 79 17 Ra ..... 79 T E M E C U L A ���CheST¢r Promenade Palm Mall • r • r r r Plaza 6 15 Solana 0 Time and/orTransfer Point Wy O Transfer Point and Information Alternate Routing �atAats�a�a Margarita 24 79 Temecula E.S. M.S. • Tower plaza Town (a Target a A Rancho California Rd Palomar a Temecula • W age c Stage Stop • Rancho Vista A a Post office 'O Old Town 6th St Main St o n —y v F Temecula c� T City Hall 1st 15 a « �©m Temecula Library iemerula PZgQ, Valley Hospital o Qw IPemecula valleyii.s. aubd R / DePortola Temecula Pkwy 79 d9d I o�es\ara�ik walmort Vail Ranch Pkwy V aA�yl Birdsall PeSports Park ha© yRePde Hpapw erkcoPrknwDr Rsort ..,,0 N 6reatOakH.S. 114I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Moreno Valley Metrolink Station to Orangecrest and Moreno Valley Mall Routing and timetables No service on weekends or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, subject to change. Ch ri stm a s Day a n El N ew Yea r's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O Boarding diagram I Page 29 11 1 16 1 18 19 126 31 1208 1210 SunLine220 z1s MORENO VALLEY 60 Walmart Moreno, Town Cir Superrentoe`,6 (ampualley Mall Pkwy �o001`Q��i Heritage Way » G Eucalyptus Ave atie� EAST LOOP 0 T R I V E R S I D E N 20 26 Metrolink Alessandro Blvd 10 1;o a Moreno Valley/March Field plazu 20 22 26 O Metrolink Station «Mission Grove Pkwy c WEST LOOP IN, r ' °0 215 26 27 �y Orange Terrace Pkwy 0 R A N G E C R E S T vdnB�rPnB/pa 118I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Galleria at Tyler - Perris Station - Hemet Vallev Mall - Florida & Lincoln Information Center (951)565-5002 RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subjectto change. Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. OBoarding diagram Page 28 Galleria Gold Line 1 10 12 at Tyler 13 200 14 15 21 27 r TTYIer St O RIVERSIDE 91 California citrus Van Buren Blvtl d State Historic Park < °' Van Buren Drive -In Theater W 0 0 D C R E S T 20 Washington St Wood Rd MILK High 0 22 27 School �O «Trautwein Rd r ,�Y o9� Orange Terrace • ¢ Community Center Riverside r Boarding diagram Page 30 National r cemetery m 19 22 27 30 74 > 26 27 208 212 Metrolink Perris Station*'-. 215 27 40 61 74 Transit Center Sun City 0 C Library PERRIS „gSunCityBlvOr r' c 2:2High SB Z aPerriS Blvd Perris School «Bradley Rd a 215 19 27 30 Sherman Rd n SUN CITY o= ROMOLAND ll 1 Heritage E Leon Rd High School S© 27 31 32 33 42 �i Kirby St 74 79 212 217 SB»�® ' Hemet a -a =® Valley Mall 'o c«SB «NB Gilmore St H E M E T v Legend Map not to scale 0 NBrr LyonAve 270 Time and/or Transfer Point Hemet CHemety y `�Qa�� O Transfer Point and Information — Alternate Routing when school is in session 0 V A L L E J«Lincoln Ave V I S T A Valle Vista Grant Ave Library E a o> a¢ 120 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Downtown Riverside - Eastvale Information Center (951)565-5002 RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horados son sujetos a cambios. d EASTVALE O' 3' 1 29 fastvale6ateww Hamner Ave Vermin Marketplace © a Etiwanda Ave 21 29 o O Goodman Way Archer St ® 3 Collins St d 3 29 21 29 0 jurupavalley/ �a�gutangyvd Pedley luropa la Pedley Rd Metrolink Cinemas ¢ Station 0 J P E D L E Y DeAnzaPlaza Camino Real 3o JURUPA VALLEY pdC/�C'4he Rubidoux Legend Map r to scale ~ H.S. a R U B I D 0 U X O Time and/orTransfuPoint OTransfer Point and Information 0.tiaS��\�o�Pde p Postofhce Alternate Routing O' ® W0,11,'6\A , , 29 49 �� RIVERSIDE t L ' Gold Line 1 10 12 EaS�poJca 14 15 22 29 49 9 A�bSc 54 200 204 208 210 212 Omnitrans215 Fox Wirmoun1 $ Park Theater Market StRiverside Downtown Metrolink Station J�St - oarding diagram Page 31 1 15 O 29 49 54 200 208 210 212 Omnitrans215 Metrolink Amtrak . • ... • ... • SunLine220 126 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Perris Station - Weston & Carter (West Information Center (951)565-5002 RiversideTra nsit.com Routing and timetables No service on Sundays or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, subject to change. Christmas Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O Ramona Expy Ma Ranch Morgan St 30 41 a 'OLaMS MS MAY Rider � m R A N C H Walnut Q 215 19 , 27 '30 � w c y Orange • a Vista Orange Ave HS O rt+ Z s c WBONLY Walmart Nuevo Rd O Citrus U Ave A EAST MPerris Page 30 H.S. — LOOP 0 74nk Perris Senior Weston Rd •. Center Perris City Hall we San Jacinto Ave 2 Pis r v � _ Library PO,� �P 2 Perris Station San Jacinto dd o Transit Center 0 ' w6 W, o a link �4 4th SL30 4th St EB W EST LOOP 7th St Post 74 ��Ce P E R R I S Q 11th St a A Legend Map not to scale Ellis Ave 0 Time and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information 130 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Hemet Valley Mall - San Jacinto - Beaumont / Banning - Moreno Valley Mall Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas suaochange. RutasyhsyhDay and New Year's Day. Shared Stops: RTA and Pass Transit honor each others Day and 30-Day orariosson sujetosacambios. passes at shared stops. Sun Lakes . O Village //�� 4 HIGHLAND V��� 31 Pass Transit SPRINGSAVE o�2 o = 3 COMMERCE WAY z 31 1 32 1 74 i. , z 212 217 ¢ ¢ 31 33 m 31 210 SunLine 220 m N tt1 Pass Transit Mt San Jacinto �,',_ BUENA — � VISTA ST BFauyoNrq�F College STATE ST 0 _ _ o — City a Hall �© ©f Q a s L %g �SQQ���Q° �@• zo v` SAN z g ,NB -Ri JACINTO�=`°` 0 `' ¢ PALM c 7AVE AVE 60 NEMET LYOa rr GILMOREST)) LJ a ~ a Unmet Unified School Uemet W District Valley Mall AUTO MALL PKWY 27 33 31 32 74 Bq H q� O Wal mart 79 1 212 217 Stoneridge Towne Centre NASON ST �0' RUM( .... 20 31 1 41 KITCHING ST a 19 1 31 0 PERRIS BLVD Senior Center MORENO VALLEY Boarding diagram I Page 29 z FREDERICKST. : 1 11 1 16 1 18 1 19 26 31 1208 1210 ISunLine220 w Moreno Valley Mall Legend I Map not to scale t Time and/or Transfer Point T Transfer Point and Information 134I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Hemet Valley Mall - Mt. San Jacinto Colleae Information Center (951)565-5002 RiversideTransit.com DTA D......... Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Rutasyhoradosson Day andNewYea r'sDay. sujetos a cambios. A, O 31 32 74 212 217 Sagecrest Dr w . MS. SPA_ Senior (enter 0 N ¢ C a c o Y � C H OMenlo Ave Hemet DPSS Valley a Medical Center Devonshire Ave N Mt. San Jacinto College Ramona Expy City Hall Main St North Mountain Main St M.S. 7th St O o _ r Evans: Es IanadeAve � r Regal San Commonwealth Ave _ Jacinto Metro 12 Super Walmart S A N J A C I N T 0 32 33 Hemet .O _ Latham Ave Valley 74 Mall m Florida Ave 74 Hemet ¢ 00011 Acacia Acacia Ave MS o Hemet Unified Central H E M E T Srhaat. District Mavherry Ave Stetson Thornton Ave IF r• r r r r OTime and/orTransferPoint OTransfer Point and Information ® Alternate Routing 138 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Hemet Valley Mall - Sanderson & Thnrntnn - ttanfnrd R, Statcnn Information Center (951)565-5002 RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables No service on weekends or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, subject to change. Christmas Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. 40 74 Stanford St s Hemet 27 33 ¢ Dartmouth M.S. H.S. 27 32 33 r. 32 1 33 1 74 San Jacinto St 79 DPSS > v Buena Vista St» — 0 Simpson Senior Cent State St a 0 Lyon Ave ¢ Dartmouth St A EAST Columbia St H E M E T 0 a N San Jacinto St Medical [enter a ¢ Gilbert St HEMET0 o - a S Lyon Ave 1 ¢ %Gilmore St 0 Y Hemet KirbySt O Valley Mall social L •Security Sanderson Ave : office Sanderson Ave State St Lyon Ave T Sanderson&Thornton ®mm V Target � y [171mjOr o 27 31 32 33 42 74 79 212 217 74 Cawston Ave •r r r r r OTime and/orTransferPoint N OTransfer Point and Information 142 I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Lake Elsinore - Can Lake Quail Information Center Canyon ' y Q (951)565-5002 Valle - SCit /Menifee RiversideTransit.com Valley y RTABus.com Routing and timetables No service on weekends or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, subject to change. Christmas Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horanos son sujetos a cambios. 27 40 61 74 , O 215 Sun City Menifee M E N I F E E 215 Library CityHoll 0 a Bradley Rd Legend Map not r scale Sun City t EvarMur Rd a S U IN 0 Time and/orTransferPoint a C I T Y KayCeniceros O Transfer Po Senior Center 3 z rietaa Rd © Railroad Canyon Rd C A N Y O N Quail Valley Main L A K E Fire Station Goetz Rd Gate © Canyon Lake Y aryHalL Q U A I L a o����S�a VALLEY Ol w df 10�0y� � a EK101 15 LAKE E L S I N 0 R E 0 Walmart VsaQeS� o 0 E 0 144I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Mead Valley Community Center - Moreno Vallev College - RUMC Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Day a n d N ew Yea r's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O 20 1 31 1 41 .. Aw, MORENO VALLEY z 41u, 1FKDr C OVista Del Gentian Ave Lago H.S. Moreno Valley Iris Ave 18 19 20 1 41 Krameria Ave 215 Rancho Verde H.S. O DA ViJmonaE MEAD VALLEY 19 41 22 41 Ross/Lowe's/ Starcrest %• _ o� �a\ VerdeQ Val061tarre'st- „ ' 0 9 H.S.OakwoodSti= Cajalco Rd.cMorgan St Ross Rider StO 1 Mead Valley ' Community center 1 19 41 P E R R I S Legend I Map not to scale O Time and/orTransfer Point T Transfer Point and Information 146 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Hemet Valle Mall - San Jacinto - Soboba Information Center y (951)565-5002 Casino RiversideTransit.com RTABus.com Routing and timetables No service on Sundays or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, subject to change. Christmas Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. IOSoboba N Soboba Rd Ono Legend I Map notto scale o Soboba Springs 70Tran and/or Transfer Point RamonaExpy v ©Mobile Home fer Point and Information Estates PLO P J`/,ro9�P San Jacin[o yP�it�sf San Jacinto GlyHall Community Q 1r S A N ste Center 32 42 74 JACINTO �Ps sd�tdF P Super Walmart 240 G QJe ® 1r�� oaaQP, EXCEED JP oa Riverside County yQ �oP Child SupportServices �y0 d/ H E M E T �a 9�P 27 31 32 33 42 41i 74 79 212 217 t Hemet Valley 74 Mall OJ� P �a 150 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Downtown Riverside -Country Village / Fontana Routing and timetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. am MTff.r ' Boarding diagram I Page 31 1 15 �O29 49 54 200 208 210 212 N Omnitrans215 Metrolink Amtrak SunLine 220 RIVERSIDE Fox P Theater s� 60 for Pia � iq 00 f� a � 2911 49 a do as Y ' RUBIDOUX � �Edam z DPSS� Louis Senior Robidoux Center z �d//pyw Library y o � m z W � m z z m ,o 1 � ® 1 49 Omnitrans82 z ri JU�Upd qd The Cove Waterpark Glen Avon Heritage Park Camino Real Patriot H.S. Pyr/te St a PedleyRd Gold Line 1 10 12 14 15 22 29 49 54 200 204 208 210 212 Omnitrans215 JURUPA VALLEY FelSParst GLEN AVON Countryy Village Rd .� h Country Village 21 49 '204 Legend I Map not to scale OTime and/orTransfer Point OTransfer Point and Information 154I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Routing and timetables Runs Monday — Thursday Only. No service on Fridays, weekends or: New Year's Day, MILK subject to change. Day, Lincoln's Birthday, President's Day, Washington's Birthdays, Cesar Chavez Day, Memorial Day, Ruran sujetos a cambros. Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day. /O N 11th St. 12th St. . CUTI 1' 1 13 1 15 50 ' Riverside' Community Hospital RIVERSIDE 1 Eden Lutheran Church 0 First United o Methodist m Church of Riverside 0 Calvary Presbyterian church Parking Lot(nearest stop 14th & Magnolia) Terracina Dr �c Central I US,Ramona Dr Riverside City Hall Riverside County 1 Oth St. Court House County Riverside Administration Halloflustice Center Riverside S Family Law Courthouse t< N 14th St. GJ S c 15th St LIJ 13 15 50 O Time and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information 0 Busstop Riverside City College T Magnolia &Terracina E/B 0®®�- 158I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Crest Cruiser UCR - Canvon Crest Towne Centre Information Center (951)565-5002 RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables No service on weeKenas or: Memorial uay, inaepenaence uay, Labor uay, I nanKsgiving uay, subject to change. Christmas Day and New Year's Day or days when school is not in session. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. ORiverside County Stater Brothers ©T Iowa & Bla T University Village&VillageTowersApts VIE Om�®® Riverside Citibank ViIlage'rowers SportsTeois` 0 ApartmentsCom lexPUniversity$t lAd i/n/V Bannockburn LooMess ers/tygv. Village BankofAmerica ©UCR O/6ce 01d Line1Gold Line 1 14 51 5216 51204 o l i s 16 51 208 �assarst 210 212 SunLine 220 �OB/Va 215 01 0 RIVERSIDE Andulka Park O 22 1 51 Centr,14" 0 Time and/or Transfer Point O Transfer Point and Information Q stop Monte V. Dr VQ Pueblo dy"IO� Ralph's 161 51 alph Allie's Hallmark Post OKice Canyon Crest Towne Centre 160 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Hunter Park Metrolink Station to UCR Information Center (951)565-5002 RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables No service on weekends or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, subject to change. Christmas Day a n d New Year's Day. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O13 1 52 1 Metrolink • • . Hunter Park Marlborough Ave © Metrolink Station RIVERSIDE CO) T Iowa at UniversitFFF MI. m ®� a � n Spruce St Massachusetts Ave •• 1 10 14 5' 52 Blaine St Riverside Sports Center 3 Linden St University Village Towers University Gold Lin e 1 Plaza 16 51 52 Regency Apartments Theatres O 204 University Aver i7rM. ....: UCR 162 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Downtown Riverside Metrolink Shuttle EVERYONE RIDES rnrr Routing and timetables No service on weekends or: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, subject to change. Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Rutas designadas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. O1 12 13 14 15 22 29 49 54 204 OMission Inn Horel&Spa RIVERSIDE 91 m tS s/�9`P ass/0/ �m Gold Line 1 10 12 22 29 49 a, ac° Post Office 54 200 204 208 210 o` 212 0mnitrans215 �c 9 10 12 13 54 200 208 210 212 ©Riverside County Administration jS Center 91 ��oc ~ 712hs� % 1th H Court'cr METROLINK f� s Cr 0 Riverside - Downtown Metrolink Station OTime and/or Transfer Point 0 Stop s I Boarding diagram I Page 31' 1 15 29 1 49 54 200 208 210 L212 Omnitrans 215 Metrolink Amtrak SunLine 220 1� 164I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Promenade Mall - Harveston EVERYONE RIDES FRFF Routing and timetables No service on weekends or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, subject to change. Christmas Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Does not operate June 11 through August 14, 2018. O T E M E C U L A �¢-�t Rustic Glen Dr Id�PG/ s dry s Ysabel Ql Barnett �e5�°� F.S. s rr Township Rd _m S �O RRVESTON Hary Cha arral ` Wston p s Y a � �atvestion�t 23 24 55 61 Equity Dr 79 217 z Grmunitylman / Community Library The Promenade at Temecula 23 24 55 �Ol�, 61 79 217 Polm Plaza Shopping Center Costro Ertendedstay �C America d ves�a� 90, Rancho Temecula Town Center 0"S19d .d«CamposVerdes Ln N General Kearny Rd Overland Or Abbot Best Laboratories 2C ' western Q Wy 55 79 202' 205 206 208 o stop l 217 Q Transfer Point and Information 166I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY South Perris Metrolink Station, Sun City/Menifee - Murrieta - Temecula Routing and timetables No service on Sundays or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, subject to change. Ch ristmas Day a nd New Yea r's Day. Rutas y horarios son O sujetos a cambios. 17,215 O A z,s N 61 74 208 Metrolink McCall Blvd �A S U N -TON « Encanto Dr CITY • Sun civibra ns sa a 42 27 1 40 161 ' 74 i a Menifee City Hall Newport Rd Countryside La Piedra Rd La Piedra RdMa"erPlace O c MSJC Menifee 61 74 Legend I Map not to scalLj 0 Time and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information C111111M Alternate Routing a � z15 z a Scott Rd 'Oo Mapleton St)) Keller Rd» GladiolusAve Bd «Loma Linda n6%, University Target Linnel Ln ?Medical Center Domenigoni Pkwy M E N I F E E w Vista Murrieta a H.S. 04.0 01 ¢Se r ,s M U R R I E T A z,s "�` SP�a VP a PI1 © 23 61 Ise PaFIR. IMPT F Rancho S Medical \ Center Murrieta Hot Springs Rd Spn Murrieta Rd t d cc 9 d t 23 1 24 155 61 is �� co 79 1217 P o�96c T E M E C U L A U%ry nterDr '23 24 55 O Temecula 61 79 217 rPromenadeMall MaC9aC\`aQ6 168 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY San Jacinto - Hemet - Sun City - Perris Routing and timetables No service on Sundays or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, subject to change. Christmas Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horanos son sujetos a cambios. Mt. San Jacinto College Super Walmorr San Jacinto Ave 011 1 a San 32 42 74 p Jacinto DPSS S A N J A C I N T 0 0 L Westbound 31 1 32 1 74 212 217 only Legend I Map notto scalea O Time and/or Transfer Point OTransfer Point and Information C1111EM Alternate Routing H E M E T Ave e tastbound 27 31 1 32 33 42 only Gilmore St 74 79 1212 1 217 VIM Iki[4 Hemet Valley Mall Sanderson Ave 33 74 79 a, Super WestYalley Walmart N.S. C T O LL _ Warren Rd tA Y � x HESTER Winchester Rd • - Post Office _�A IMendee �� Mt. San 74 79 f Jacinto 3 College/ 7717ink Z Menifee M E N I F E E Menifee Rd,, Menifee Community — O Valley Centerand Park Ar Medical Center a Antelope Rd» > Menifee 61 74 208 Metrolink © Bradley Rd countryside v Marketplace Sun City -o Library m i 215 E Sun City Blvd 3 61 74 ZD z Goetz Murrietand m PERRIS SUN � Perris Blvd N CSOPerrisStation CITY 27 1 40 , 61 '1 74 Transit Center 172 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Hemet - Winchester - Temecula Information Center (951)565-5002 RiversideTransit.com "AD... .-- Routing and timetables No service on Sundays or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, suasyho2dos son odrange. Rottas y hChristmas Day and New Year's Day. sujetos a cambios. Hemet Valley Mall O33 74 79 Devonshire Ave O Target a Y y Super 74 0 74 79 walmart' ¢ Florida Ave 9 Post Office MustangWy o • Simpson N.S. z West Valley Rd Winchester Rd & Simpson Rd,, O R Winchester Rd & O Pourroy Rd H E M E T Pourroy Rd/Whispering » Heights New 27 31 32 33 42 ]g AlgraveAve» Sky 74 79 2' 217 WINCH ESTER o c a t Thompson Rd F R E N C H «Benton Rd V A L L E Y 23 1 24 55 61 Temeku St nMagdasColoradas5t Southwest . 79 217 Briggs Rd» P�hO% Auld Rd 0 justice M U R R I E T A Center French Valley ' hJ�r • y�rjp�r/Ptd Airport Sheriff r p� Station r�9s oc 23 24 55 `,�� 61 79 217 © Nicolas Rd 15 Chaparral •' County " ' Center Dr: 3 23 1 79 Dt 4` 79 T E M E C U L A EQ�ttY Grace Mellman Promenade CommunityLihrary r At Temecula 55 79 202 205, 206 1 208 cO • ' ' 217 D�et�a�aOt 0 Pa o 15 • r r r r r OTime and/or Transfer Point Temecula Morenot7d OTransfer Point and Information 24 79 Stage Stop g 6th & Front w 176 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY in, San Bernardino - Riverside - Anaheim Information Center (951)565-5002 RiversideTransit.com Routing andtimetables Sunday service on: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas subject to change. Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. I \ 4 / ® Downtown •• • • . ' • • • • • • Boarding diagram I Page 31 1 1 15 San Bernardino z,s 29 49 54 200 208 210 1212 OTransit Center Omnitrans 215 Metrolink Amtrak �1 ; SunLine 220 SAN BERNARDINO to Downtown Riverside s Gold Line 1 10 12 14 15 22 29 49 54 200 204 208 210 z 212 Omnitrans 215 a d f RIVERSIDE J l Mc�\��e`ISt ts' Boarding diagram I Page 28 Gold Line 1 10 12 13 14 15 21 27 200 Galleria at Tyler (Across from Riverside -Downtown Metrolink Station) Vine Street w� 9 La Sierra Metrolink Station (Indiana Ave) T La Sierra Metrolink Station ® rr r®' zat L V H Meats &Tustin r -5 o v 200 205 OCTA 24, 42, 46, 50, 71,167, 213 ss r r Village At Orange �� s c, o m O Time and/or Transfer Point __ w 57 Y OTransfer Point and Information ANAHEIM S Anaheim • Bus Stop Disneyland O s Convention Center .5 (Katella & Harbor) 180 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY 'M Murrieta - Temecula - Oceanside Transit Center Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. Information Center (951) 565-5002 RiversideTransit.com RTABus.com No service on: Memorial Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year's Day. Beach Bus Service: June 18 through September 3, including Sunday service Independence Day, Labor Day. O ndl mla St o;�s 23 ' 202 205 1206 • • .. , L fD Murrieta Hot Springs M U R R I E T A 15 \the T E M E C U L A j 55 79 202 205t 206 1208 Abbott 217 Vascular I Rancho California Rd» RIVERSIDE COUNTY -------------------------------------------- - SAN DIEGO COUNTY rn a_ \5%6Q RNA \F �s pd/ 106 Q CO- s,J P, ods l � Pie, 202 NCTD OCEANSIDE 202 Coaster NCTD Greyhound Amtrak California Sprinter/Metrolink Town Center North a------------------- iga _' © Park -And -Ride o / Lot 19 F A L L B R 0 0 K Legend I Mapsnot r scale OTime and/or Transfer Point © Transfer Point and Information 0 Stop COMMUTEF'LINK 184I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Information Center TIA UCR - Riverside - Ontario Mills Mall - Montclair (951) 565-5002 Transcenter RiversideTransit.com RTABus.com Routing and timetables No service on weekends or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, subject to dos so eadwnn. RChristmas Day and New Year's Day. sujetos a cambios. OZ 204 1 Omnitrans 66, 85, 88, 290 > o,I Foothill Transit Metrolink M0NTCLAIR CD:a Z Monte��sta s o W ^ 0 10 Montclair Plaza 0 Z Central Ave Montclair Transcenter a 0 x . 0NTAR10 Gold Line 1 10 12 Milliken Ave 14 15 22 29 49 60 0 54 200 204 208 210 212 Omnitrans215 t Ontario 0 (175 Mills Mail 1 1 12 1 13 1 14 15 Country Village . ';� r 22 1 29 49 1 54 204 Park -And -Ride a ' Mission Blvd = =""""""" '�"""'" 204 Omnitrans 61, 81, 82, 290 ©_ s Mulberry Ave .. Southbound • - Market StPedleyRd». = StopNB at C t V'rll Rd oun ry age & Country Club Dr. x I UCR Extension _ P-< «Iowa Ave 1; UC�� RIVERSIDE ' t traffic OJ «Canyon Crest Dr T UCR at Bannockburn 0 T Iowa at University Gold Li e Om ®®204 COMMUTEF LINK Legend I Maps not to scale OTime and/orTransferPoint 0 Transfer Point and Information Os Stop 188 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Temecula - Murrieta - Lake Elsinore- information center (951)565-5002 Corona Transit Center - Oranae RiversideTransit.com Routing and timetables No service on weekends or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, subject to change. Christmas Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. 55 79 202 205 206 208 O 217 T E M E C U L A .. ..o %JG 0 ....; Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Park&Ride Boarding diagram I Page 27 Gold Line 1 3 205 206 Corona Cruiser Blue, Red 15 Metrolink • Dos Lagos «TEMESCAL CANYON TEMESCAL © O 91 CANYON» o Tom' Farms 7 9G` MAIN Corona to GRAND Transit s� Center coo° M U R R I E T A �F?�991�C LAKE ELSINORE T Lake Elsinore Outlet Center Park &Ride 8®205 206 Lumiiii 1 200 205 OCTA 24, 42, 46, 50, 71,167, 213 55 55 NTUSTIN ST O Q _ Village at Orange N T CANAL ST �Q m n `v G stop m ORANGE •� 55 0 ORANGE COMMUTERLINK _a 190 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY Temecula - Murrieta - Perris - Moreno Valley Information Center ll I• Y - (951) 565-5002 • Downtown Riverside RiversideTransit.com RTABus.com No service on weekends or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year's Day. _ 1 SEE R I V E R S I D E Routing and timetables subject to change. O INSET O UCRLot 30 Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. MLK Blvd 91 �� M 0 R E N 0 VALLEY Moreno Gold Line 1 10 12 Valley Route 14 15 22 29 49 Mail deviated due 54 200 204 208 2 00 215 ° t traffic 212 Omnitrans 215 — w Mission Inn Ave o o conditions San Jacinto Ave E R R I S Vine St .... m r • a Layover O z Boarding diagram I Page 30 O m 19 22 27 30 74 — 208 212 1 Metrolink 4th St MLK Blvd 1d a s �P ©' ' If 10111 IN 71=117 61 1 74 1208 1 Metrolink 10 12 13 54 200 �a�QSQa, �O4�POr 208 210 212 r Boarding diagram Page 31 1 15 29 T 49 54 200 1208 210 212 Omnitrans 215 Metrolink Amtrak SunLine 220 215 Legend I Maps notto scale MURRIETA 23 61 208 0 Time and/orTransferPoint P��pRITARD © Transfer Point and Information g i� O Bus StopiyQ� 'oO Los Alamos Rd i o�q ©& Whitewood Rd ® Alternate Routing x 9yo ' P�a`ya 77 .... 55 79 202 205 206 208 15 ' 217 SEE Promenade INSET At Temecula COMMUTERLINK T E M E C U L A 194I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY - - - - - Ull Boarding diagram I Page 29 11 16 18 19 26 31 208 210 SunLine 220 Riverside - Beaumont - Palm Desert Information Center (951)565-5002 W nil RiversideTransit.com RTABus.com No service on weekends or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year's Day. ------------------------------------ Routing and timetables 'O subject to change. ZONE 1 Rutas y horarios son 1 CABAZON -RIVERSIDE ; sujetos a cambios. 0, 31 210 SunLine 220 Beaumont Casino Walmart Morongo UCR`O�I© 60 SunLine 1 Lot 30 7-- 10 12 Boa 29 49 11 208 210 31 212 Omnitrans215 Mission Inn Ave Vine St LayoverO T S T CountyAdministration Center m®®m I r SunLine 220 �WAW�0 Transit Hub (Varner & Harry Oliver Trail) ling diagram Page 29 ZONE 2 Q THOUSAND PALMS. ' 16 18 1 19 26 PALM DESERT ' 208 210 SunLine220 O Palm Desert Mall (Town Center Way & Hahn Rd) Legend I Mapsnot r scale OTime and/orTransfer Point OTransfer Point and Information © Bus Stop COMMUTERLINK RTA PASSES, AND GO -PASS, U-PASS AND CITY PASS PROGRAMS NOT ACCEPTED ON SUN LINE 220 For more information about Route 220, contact SunLine: (800) 347-8628 CASH FARES CATEGORIES WITHIN TRAVELING ZONE 1 OR BETWEEN ZONE2 ZONE 1 AND ZONE 2 GENERAL/YOUTH $3 $6 SENIOR/DISABLED/ $2 $4 MEDICARE/CHILD ADDITIONAL CASH FARES REQUIRED WITH VALID MEDIA OR ACCEPTED ID CARDS TRAVELING WITHIN WITHIN BETWEEN ZONE1 ZONE2 ZONE 1AND ZONE2 PASSES 1-DAY 30-DAY WITHIN TRAVELING WITHIN TRAVELING ZONE 1 OR BETWEEN ZONE 1AND ZONE 1 OR BETWEEN ZONE 1AND ZONE2 ZONE2 ZONE2 ZONE2 $7 $14 $75 $150 $5 $10 $50 $100 198 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY N N Routing and timetables subject to change. Rutas y horarios son sujetos a cambios. San Jacinto - Hemet - Perris -Riverside Information Center (951)565-5002 RiversideTransit.com RTABus.com No service on weekends or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year's Day. Gold Line 1 10 12 14 15 22 29 49 rFp 54 200 204 208 2 00 91 RIVERSIDE Boarding diagram I Page 30 19 22 27 1 30 74 208 212 1 Metrolink Perris Station Transit Center 0 Metrolink 212 Omnitrans 215 O UCR Lot 30 Mission Inn Ave fly Rio ° Vine St Layover© V .. E� M 0 R E N I VALLEY 60 14th St MLK Blvd � � • 10 12 13 54 200 208 210 212 P E R R I S Downtown Metrolink Boarding diagram Page 31 1 15 29 49 54 200 208 210 212 Omnitrans215 Metrolink Amtrak SunLine 220 O Hemet °q�P Valley 27 31 32 33 42 ,a Mall© 74 79 212 217 S A N J A C I N T 0 Hemet Transit Depot Mt San Jacinto College Legendr to oP SEE s <"z d Od Time and/or Transfer Point INSET q` P OTransfer Point and Information Bus Stop H E M E T COMMUTERLINK 200I RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY San Jacinto - Hemet - Temecula - Escondido Information Center (951)565-5002 RiversideTransit.com RTABus.com Routing and timetables No service on weekends or: Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, subject to change. Rutas y horarios son Christmas Day and New Year's Day. sujetos a cambios. .... 31 1 32 74 212 217 27 31 32 33 42 N O 74 79 212 217 tMt.San Devonshire Ave•'itJacintoHemet ilui, tCollegev�ue,.n Florida Ave OTime and/orTransferPoint OTransfer Point and Information O Stop ® Alternate Routing 0 215 QS M U R R I E T A 79 23 24 55 61 79 217 County is Center Dr T Equity &Ynez mmmm m® E S C 0 N D I D 0 76 Margariita Rd 79 74 Q Stetson Ave S " HEMET N Domenigoni Pkwy COMMUTERLINK Promenade 9tTem...a,QVm 55 79 202 205 206 208 «M°sock 217 1 �ad'largari7tdRdT E M E C U L A 217 1 NCTD I MTS The Sprinterl Greyhound Escondido City Hall ffEscondido Transit Center Ave 202 1 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY La Sierra Metrolink or Canyon Community Church - South Coast Metro $6.00 W Y" Routing and timetables Route operated by OCTA. Runs Weekdays only. No service on weekends or: Memorial subject to change. Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and New Year's Day. Rutas y horari0s son sujetos a cambios. ORIVERSIDE La Sierra 0 Metrolink 15 JOCTA794 Station CORONA 15 © PR ---------- Canyon o� Community Church Main St Park and Ride 91 241 113 A N A H E I M 0 R A N G I 55 405 Hutton Centre 57 S A N T A A N A O COSTA 91 OCTA 55, 57, 76, 86,150, 211, 216, M E S A 463, 794 O South South Coast © Coast Plaza Park And Ride Metro 2041 RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY MON fli19TRA TGTN SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY 2018/2019 1 FY 2020/2021 SunLine was established under a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) on July 1, 1977 between the County of Riverside and the cities of the Coachella Valley, which at the time included the cities of Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, Indio, Palm Desert and of Palm Springs. The JPA was later amended to include the cities of Cathedral City, Indian Wells, La Quinta, and Rancho Mirage. The JPA's governing board is comprised of one elected official from each member entity and one county supervisor. SunLine is headquartered in Thousand Palms, CA. 0), 1 5►►►►L►ne SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 (Nissir 4611v$V ���� SUAUAE OR GA A TZA TIONA L STRU The executive managers of SunLine Transit Agency are as follows: SIM11,19 tfl,4NGIT AGENCY PREPARED BY SUNLINE STAFF SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN " P Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUHI�% 9 fly is911 AG[IV CY TABLE OF COATEATS GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS........................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................ 9 RELATIONSHIP OF THE SRTP TO OTHER PLANS, PROJECTS, AND ACTIONS.........................................10 GuidingFramework......................................................................................................10 FinancialStability.........................................................................................................10 Ridership.......................................................................................................................10 Demographics...............................................................................................................11 OPERATING PLAN AND BUDGET................................................................................................11 FixedRoute Bus............................................................................................................11 Paratransit....................................................................................................................11 Capital Improvement Program.....................................................................................11 Looking Ahead: Planning Service Changes and New Initiatives..................................12 CHAPTER 1: SYSTEM OVERVIEW...............................................................13 DESCRIPTION OF SUNLINE SERVICE AREA...................................................................................13 POPULATION PROFILE AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTION................................................................13 FIXED ROUTE SERVICE OVERVIEW.............................................................................................16 SUNBUS SERVICE FREQUENCY AND SPAN...................................................................................18 PARATRANSIT SERVICE OVERVIEW.............................................................................................19 Vanpool........................................................................................................................ 20 MicroTransit................................................................................................................ 20 CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE.....................................................................................................21 Proposed Fare Modifications and Plans for Promoting Ridership................................22 Taxi Voucher Program.................................................................................................. 22 PASSOUTLETS......................................................................................................................23 REVENUEFLEET.....................................................................................................................23 Paratransit.................................................................................................................... 24 SupportVehicles...........................................................................................................24 EXISTING FACILITIES...............................................................................................................25 Administrative and Operating Facilities.......................................................................25 Stopsand Facilities.......................................................................................................25 PLANNED FACILITIES...............................................................................................................26 OperationsFacility........................................................................................................26 BUSSHELTERS.......................................................................................................................26 FUTURE TRANSIT HUBS...........................................................................................................27 EXISTING COORDINATION BETWEEN TRANSIT AGENCIES AND PRIVATE PROVIDERS .............................27 COORDINATION WITH OTHER PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROVIDERS................................................28 PRIVATE TRANSPORTATION......................................................................................................28 TaxiAdministration......................................................................................................28 3 CHAPTER 2: EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE ........................ 30 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................30 siding rNis N/1 A6[IV rr SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 FIXED ROUTE SERVICE — ROUTE BY ROUTE ANALYSIS....................................................................30 Service Efficiency and Effectiveness.............................................................................31 PARATRANSIT SERVICE —SYSTEM PERFORMANCE.........................................................................32 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS...............................................................................................33 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS.....................................................................................34 Service Standards and Warrants..................................................................................35 AreaCoverage.............................................................................................................. 35 Market Area Characteristics......................................................................................... 35 Transit -Dependent Populations....................................................................................36 SpecialMarket Needs...................................................................................................36 Service Standards of Evaluating New Services.............................................................36 MAJOR TRIP GENERATORS & PROJECTED GROWTH......................................................................36 EQUIPMENT, PASSENGER AMENITIES AND FACILITY NEEDS............................................................37 Passenger Amenities and Bus Stop Improvement Program.........................................37 Real -Time Signage Displays..........................................................................................37 On -Board Passenger Amenities....................................................................................37 BicycleFacilities............................................................................................................37 On -Board Security Cameras.........................................................................................37 Bus Replacement Program...........................................................................................38 FacilityNeeds................................................................................................................38 CHAPTER 3: SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION ............................... 39 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................39 RECENT SERVICE CHANGES......................................................................................................39 PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION....................................................................40 MODIFICATIONS TO PARATRANSIT SERVICE.................................................................................41 MARKETING PLANS AND PROMOTION........................................................................................41 BUDGET IMPACTS ON PROPOSED CHANGES................................................................................42 CHAPTER 4: FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS .............................................. 43 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET............................................................................................43 FUNDING PLANS TO SUPPORT PROPOSED OPERATING AND CAPITAL PROGRAM.................................43 OPERATING BUDGET..............................................................................................................44 REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS.........................................................................45 Americans with Disability Act....................................................................................... 45 Disadvantaged Business Enterprise..............................................................................45 Equal Employment Opportunity...................................................................................45 TitleVI...........................................................................................................................45 Transportation Development Act.................................................................................45 Federal Transit Administration Triennial Audit............................................................45 NationalTransit Database...........................................................................................46 AlternativeFuel Vehicles..............................................................................................46 4 FY 2018/2019 SRTP TABLES........................................................................ 47 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH ► 9 (xis911 AG[IV CY TIGURFS & TABLES Figure 1.1 SunLine Service Area 13 Figure 1.2 Growth Projections for Jurisdictions in the SunLine Service Area 15 Figure 1.3 Age Population 15 Figure 1.4 Summary of SunLine Fixed Route Transit Services, January 2018 18 Figure 1.5 SunBus Fare Structure 21 Figure 1.6 SunDial Fare Structure 21 Figure 1.7 Commuter Link Fare Structure 22 Figure 1.8 Pass Outlet Locations 23 Figure 1.9 SunBus Fixed Route Fleet 24 Figure 1.10 SunDial Paratransit Fleet 24 Figure 1.11 SunLine Facilities 25 Figure 1.12 SunLine Park -and -Ride Locations 25 Figure 1.13 Weekday Service: Top 10 Stops Served 25 Figure 1.14 Weekend Service: Top 10 Stops Served 26 Figure 1.15 New Bus Shelters by Jurisdiction (2018) 27 Figure 1.16 Taxi Franchises 29 Figure 2.1 Annual Comparison of SunBus Ridership 30 Figure 2.2 Fixed Route Ridership 31 Figure 2.3 Analysis of Performance Statistics, FY 201612017 32 Figure 2.4 Annual Comparison of SunDial Ridership 32 Figure 2.5 Monthly Comparison of SunDial Ridership 33 Figure 2.6 Monthly Comparison of System Ridership 35 Figure 4.1 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET 44 TABLE 1 FLEET INVENTORY— FIXED ROUTE 48 TABLE 1 FLEET INVENTORY— DEMAND RESPONSE 49 TABLE 2 SRTP SERVICE SUMMARY— ALL ROUTES (SYSTEM TOTALS) 50 TABLE 2 SRTP SERVICE SUMMARY— NON -EXCLUDED ROUTES 51 TABLE 2 SRTP SERVICE SUMMARY— EXCLUDED ROUTES 52 TABLE 2 SRTP SERVICE SUMMARY— PARA TRANSIT 53 TABLE 2 54 SERVICE SUMMARY — SUNB US 54 TABLE 2A SRTP SUMMARY OF ROUTES TO BE EXCLUDED IN FY 201812019 55 TABLE 3 SRTP ROUTE STATISTICS —ALL ROUTES 56 TABLE 3A INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS 57 TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF FUNDS FOR FY 201812019 58 TABLE 4A — Capital Project Justification [SL-19-01] 59 TABLE 4A — Capital Project Justification [SL-19-02] 60 TABLE 4A — Capital Project Justification [SL-19-03] 61 TABLE 4A — Capital Project Justification [SL-19-04] 62 TABLE 4A — Capital Project Justification [SL-19-05] 63 TABLE 4A — Capital Project Justification [SL-19-06] 64 TABLE 4A — Capital Project Justification [SL-19-07] 65 TABLE 4A — Capital Project Justification [SL-19-08] 66 TABLE 4A — Capital Project Justification [SL-19-09] 67 Table 4A — Capital Project Justification [SL-19-10] 68 TABLE 5.1 SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED FOR FY 201912020 69 TABLE 5.1A CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION FOR FY 201912020 70 TABLE 5.1A — Capital Project Justification (SL-20-01] 70 TABLE 5.1A — Capital Project Justification (SL-20-02] 71 Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification (SL-20-03] 72 Table 5.1A — Capital Project Justification [SL-20-04] 73 199fli g SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • 1 0 1 S 2 0 1 9 r0ax911 ASINcr V TABLE 5.2 SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED FOR FY 202012021 74 TABLE 5.2A CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION FOR FY 202012021 75 TABLE 5.2A —Capital Project Justification (SL-21-01 j 75 TABLE 5.2A — Capital Project Justification (SL-21-021 76 TABLE 5.2A — Capital Project Justification (SL-21-031 77 Table 5.2A — Capital Project Justification (SL-21-041 78 TABLE 6 PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT 79 TABLE 7 SERVICE PROVIDER PERFORMANCE TARGETS 80 TABLE 8 FY 201812019 SRTP PERFORMANCE REPORT 81 TABLE 9 HIGHLIGHTS OF FY 201812019 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN 82 TABLE 9B FAREBOX CALCULATION 83 Figure A-1 SunBus System Map, January 2018 84 Route Profiles 85 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH ► 9 rHRNSir 14811vCY GLOSSARY OFACRONYMS ADA — Americans with Disabilities Act APTA — American Public Transit Association ARB — California Air Resources Board ATP —Active Transportation Plan AVL —Automated Vehicle Locator Caltrans — California Department of Transportation CARB — California Air Resources Board CMAQ —Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality CNG — Compressed Natural Gas COA - Comprehensive Operational Analysis DOT— United States Department of Transportation FAST Act — Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act FHWA —Federal Highway Administration FTA — Federal Transit Administration FTIP — Federal Transportation Improvement Program FY— Fiscal Year GFI — GFI Genfare GGE — Gas Gallon Equivalent GHG — Greenhouse Gases HVIP — Hybrid and Zero Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project LCTOP — Low Carbon Transit Operations Program LTF — Local Transportation Fund II siding (N9 NSIf 146 [IV ry SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 MOU — Memorandum of Understanding MPO —Metropolitan Planning Organization NTD — National Transit Database PMI — Preventive Maintenance Inspection PTMISEA — Public Transportation Modernization, Improvement, and Service Enhancement Account RCTC — Riverside County Transportation Commission RTP — Regional Transportation Plan SCS — Sustainable Communities Strategy STA — State Transit Assistance Fund TDA — California's Transportation Development Act TIP —Transportation Improvement Program TOD —Transit Oriented Development UZA — Urbanized Area ZEB —Zero Emission Bus SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH ► 9 1xis911 AGINCY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP), updated annually, covers Fiscal Years 2019 to 2021. The SRTP is a mandatory fiscal, planning and regulatory document for SunLine Transit Agency. The SRTP is intended to serve three purposes: 1. Identifies the transit services and capital improvements required to meet the transit needs of SunLine Transit Agency over a three year period and the proposed sources of funding to carry out the plan. Mission Statement To provide safe and environmentally conscious public transportation services and alternate fuel solutions to meet the mobility needs of the Coachella Valley. 2. Serves as a management tool to guide activities over the next year. 3. Provides justification for operating and capital assistance for grant applications to be submitted to state and federal funding agencies. The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) is responsible by statute for developing and approving a Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) for Riverside County (PUC 130303). SunLine and other Riverside County transit operators prepare the plans for their respective agency. Once RCTC approves and adopts the SRTP, the operators are charged with following through with implementation of the plans. Any deviation from the plan must be reported to RCTC (PUC 130057), and if the change is substantive, a plan amendment must be approved by RCTC. The allocation of funds for the upcoming fiscal year is based on approved SRTP. Beyond the requirements, the SRTP is an opportunity for SunLine Transit Agency to gather important data in a single document and develop strategic plans for the next three years. 9 SnnL►ne (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 RELATIONSHIP OF THE SRTP TO OTHER PLANS, PROJECTS, AND ACTIONS The SRTP provides a summary of and direction to other planning documents. It incorporates SunLine's goals and service standards, operating and capital budgets, service plan, and facility plan. At the same time, it is designed to give direction to future service planning activities and capital projects. The SRTP will reflect the FY 2019 operating and capital budget adopted by the Board of Directors. Guiding Framework The Board and staff are seeking to make smart transit investments that will help SunLine expand the mobility options offered to the communities it serves. As SunLine looks to grow its ridership and make strategic investments, it must continue to manage its fiscal challenges, while investing in the overarching management of SunLine's bus and paratransit system. In 2018, SunLine embarked on a process to rethink and reinvigorate transit services in the Coachella Valley. This process recognized SunLine's role as a mobility manager for the Coachella Valley and expanded the Agency's work to improve performance in the context of its fiscal and organizational health. Financial Stability The national decreasing ridership trend for fixed route transit continues to impact the Agency's financial stability. The proposed operating and capital budgets for FY 2019 are $38,900,991 and $6,053,623, respectively, which represents an operating budget increase of 11.53% over the previous fiscal year. The majority of the costs associated with the increase can be attributed to wages and benefits associated with the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for represented employees under a collective bargaining agreement. In addition, SunLine is adding a Quick Bus to the Line 111 to help improve frequency and performance, and launching a SunRide ride share program. SunLine continues to identify ways to strengthen its overall financial position in order to continue to serve a diverse community of transit users. Ridership In Fiscal Year 2016/2017, SunLine Transit Agency served 4.1 million fixed route passenger boardings, a decrease of 4.8% from the previous year. In the same year, it operated over 3.4 million miles and 238,374 hours of revenue service. Customer growth on SunLine's paratransit saw a small increase. In FY 2016/2017, SunLine 10 served 164,802 passengers, a 0.5% increase from FY 2015/2016. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • E Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH ► 9 (HANS17 AGfANY Demographics As Riverside County continues to grow, more and more of that growth is expected to be concentrated in the Coachella Valley and eastern county. According to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) projects there will be 581,300 people in the Coachella Valley in 2020, a 38% increase in population between 2008 and 2020. Seniors will see the highest percentage of growth. Increases in the senior population will continue to add a financial and resource cost for SunLine, due to anticipated increases in Paratransit services. By modernizing and improving the current eligibility process, SunLine seeks to control increasing paratransit costs. OPERATING PLAN AND BUDGET The SRTP's one-year operating plan includes a number of assumptions that drive proposed initiatives, described below. Fixed Route Bus Fixed route ridership is estimated to decline at a rate of 5.4 percent in FY 2018/2019. This assumption is based on recent ridership patterns. The ridership decrease in this SRTP is conservative for the purposes of projecting the operational budget. In contrast, strategic planning initiatives launching in the first half of FY 2018/2019 will focus the organization to "move the needle" on key metrics that drive SunLine's long-term success. Total passenger fare revenue is expected to reach $2.6M in FY 2018/2019 compared to the estimated $2.9M in FY 2017/2018. Paratransit Operating costs for paratransit services are expected to increase, the ultimate cost per passenger trip on these modes is higher than other transit modes. Service levels are expected to coincide with ridership decreases. These assumptions are based on recent ridership patterns, revised No -Show policy as well as changes to the certification process that are still ongoing. Capital Improvement Program The Capital Improvement Program for FY 2018/2019 focuses on continuing SunLine's investment in an alternative fuel technology fleet, facilities and construction of a new operations building. The three-year plan assumes a $15,250,623 capital program dependent on internal and external funding from federal, state, regional, and local sources. 11 Key components of the Capital Plan, beyond ongoing maintenance needs, include: • Vehicle replacement s9fli e SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • 1 0 1 8 2 0 1 9 rxaxsri ASINcr 12 • Vehicle expansion • Facility and systems improvements • Operational improvements and enhancements • Information technology Looking Ahead: Planning Service Changes and New Initiatives In FY 2018/2019, SunLine will focus on strengthening its existing services and piloting new mobility services to invest in the development of advanced transit scheduling expertise in- house, to enhance SunLine's ability to create efficient transit schedules to better serve customers without increasing operating costs. SunLine will also focus on improving its most successful trunk routes. Lines 14, 30, and 111 together account for 64% of all daily boardings. Improving these services will increase farebox revenue on the entire network. Additionally, SunLine is exploring the possibility of providing service to the Coachella Valley Art and Music Festival, Stagecoach Festival and realignment of Line 70 or 111 to stop near the BNP Paribas Open. The transportation industry is undergoing massive transformation, and SunLine is studying ways to improve and change its service model in order to remain competitive and continue to provide valued service to the community. In light of declining ridership and reduced funding, SunLine is undergoing a planning study to evaluate new service models that may enable SunLine to cost-effectively serve the Coachella Valley. SunLine will respond to declining ridership and development patterns, including shared, on -demand mobility services. SunLine will continue to evaluate existing services for modifications, reductions, and/or discontinuation. The planning study will help SunLine prepare for a range of uncertain funding scenarios and will include community and Board consultation throughout the process. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • I Y ? 0 1 S ? 0 1 `> S►►r►1►►►e rn'"911 ASINcr CHAPTER 1: SYSTEM OVERVIEW This chapter outlines major features of SunLine's system. The chapter describes the geography of the SunLine service area and outlines the bus service SunLine provides, population profile, current and proposed fare structure, revenue fleet, existing and planned facilities and coordination between agencies. DESCRIPTION OF SUNLINE SERVICE AREA SunLine's service area encompasses 1,120 square miles of the Coachella Valley from the San Gorgonio Pass in the west to the Salton Sea in the southeast. The Agency's service area is located approximately 120 miles east of downtown Los Angeles and 60 miles east of the Inland Empire cities of Riverside and San Bernardino. SunLine's service area is shown in Figure 1.1. Service is provided to the cities of Cathedral City, Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage. Service is also provided to the unincorporated Riverside County communities of Bermuda Dunes, Desert Edge, Mecca, North Shore, Oasis, Thermal and Thousand Palms. FIGURE 1.1 SUNLINE SERVICE AREA SunLine Service Area m ------------ - e @mom - SunLine Service Area -., 1,1205quvre Miles SunLine Network city Boundary ro>nmunlry co��di a.ca �Mllef O 44N nIfCq CtivM1'ir - POPULATION PROFILE AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROJECTION The population of the Coachella Valley is 443,401 and continues to grow at a healthy pace 13 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates). A large population of seasonal residents visit the Coachella Valley in the winter season or longer and report a hometown outside of the area. siding (N9NS/1 14614$V SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 14 The Coachella Valley is a high growth area. Riverside County is the tenth largest county in the nation in terms of population. Lower home prices and new job opportunities have fueled migration. A leading cause of the county's growth in the last decade has been migration from elsewhere. Census data shows that approximately 38 percent of the population increase is from people moving to Riverside County. As Riverside County continues to grow, more and more of that growth is expected to be concentrated in the Coachella Valley and eastern county. Coachella Valley continues to develop to meet the needs of residents with a broad range of amenities, public facilities and programs. From 2000 to 2014, the Coachella Valley population grew from 309,530 to 443,401, for a net gain of 133,871 people, or 43%, including adjustments based on the Census Bureau's 2013 American Community Survey. The Coachella Valley's 43% increase in population from 2000 to 2014 was much faster than the Inland Empire (34%), the U.S. (12.5%) and California (13%). The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) projects there will be 581,300 people in the Coachella Valley in 2020, a 38% increase in population between 2008 and 2020. Projected growth rates vary significantly across SunLine's service area and not all communities are anticipating significant growth. From 2000 to 2014, the city of Indio led the Coachella Valley in growth, followed by La Quinta and Desert Hot Springs. Each of these cities has land to develop. The unincorporated areas of the valley are expected to see half of all the population growth between 2008 and 2035. SCAG anticipates that much of this expansion in unincorporated areas will take place north of Interstate 10 and in the areas south and west of the city of Coachella. Growth within Palm Springs and Palm Desert is expected to occur at a rate that is less than half that of the Coachella Valley as a whole. Growth generates an increased demand for municipal services, including transit, and development patterns can significantly affect the cost and efficiency of providing those services. In areas where development includes low density or outlying communities, existing services can be impacted to a greater degree than if development occurs within a core service area. Figure 1.2 presents growth projections as forecast by SCAG in 2013 for jurisdictions within SunLine's service area. The figure also illustrates the relative share of growth anticipated for each jurisdiction, in comparison to the Coachella Valley as a whole. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • I Y ? 0 1 S ? 0 1 `> S►►r►1►►►e fly"911 ASINcr FIGURE 1.2 GROWTH Cathedral City PROJECTIONS FOR JURISDICTIONS IN THE Population Populati Population A �M 50,200 57,000 64,600 SUNLINE Pop. from 2008 to 2035 29% SERVICE AREA -.. Growth in 3% Coachella 38,200 70,200 128,700 237% 21% Desert Hot Springs 25,200 43,500 58,100 131% 8% Indian Wells 4,800 5,500 5,800 21% 0% Indio 73,300 91,500 111,800 53% 9% La Quinta 36,100 41,600 46,300 28% 2% Palm Desert 47,100 52,100 56,800 21% 2% Palm Springs 43,400 48,900 56,100 29% 3% Rancho Mirage 16,900 18,8001 22,900 36% 1% Unincorporated Areas 87,500 152,200 308,600 253% 51% Total: 1 422,700 581,3001 859,700 100% SOURCE: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS 2013 State figures show that Riverside County will lead California in terms of growth rate. Between 2010 and 2060, Riverside County's population is expected to expand by 92 percent, with the Coachella Valley growing at a higher rate than the rest of the county. Seniors will see the highest percentage of growth. In the Coachella Valley, 25.5 percent of residents are older than 60, while the state shows 17.5 percent. The senior population has different wants and needs than younger individuals. For example, an area of retirees typically requires more paratransit service than fixed route bus service. An increase in the senior population will greatly increase ADA paratransit costs, adding a financial and resource cost for SunLine. As shown in Figure 1.3 to the right, the blue line shows the percentage of the Coachella Valley population in different age brackets, divided into five-year increments, while the orange line shows the measurement for the entire state. In addition, SunLine experiences a high influx of seasonal residents. Seasonal roadway congestion is serious enough to impact transit -running times. FIGURE 1.3 AGE POPULATION AGE IMSIMMEMON Coachella Valley vs. All slifornia % of CV Pop-jiatior_ in -A,,qe F#-ac_te= % a= CA Populatiar. in Ag. a 3racket M+ w-M 75-73 7F74 6-0 win 554a 049 45-44 M-M W34 25-a a-M 15-11 w-14 1-4 1% Hi rx 1% 4% Y4 se 7% ex 1 5 % of Par-ulation siding (Nis NIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 FIXED ROUTE SERVICE OVERVIEW SunLine's local fixed route network, SunBus, consists of sixteen (16) routes, including three (3) trunk routes, eleven (11) local routes connecting the Valley from Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs in the northwest to Mecca, Oasis, and North Shore in the east, one (1) express line from Desert Hot Springs to Palm Desert and one (1) Regional Commuter Route operating between Palm Desert and Riverside. The SunBus and Commuter Link 220 lines are summarized in Figure 1.4. The service is designed to meet an array of travel needs that connect neighborhoods to jobs, schools, shopping and other destinations. The amount of service available is limited by the level of funding available for transit in the local service area. In Fiscal Year 2016/2017, SunLine Transit Agency served 4.1 million fixed route passenger boardings, a decrease of 4.8% from the previous year. In the same year, it operated over 3.4 million miles and 238,374 hours of revenue service. SunLine updated the SunLine Service Standards Policy, with an adoption date of October 2017. The policy classifies each route in the SunLine transit network into three tiers that define the service level and performance expectation for each service. SunLine's proposed principal service types are trunk routes, local routes, and market -based routes. Service types are defined in part operationally and in part by the land use characteristics of their corridors. Service effectiveness is evaluated by service type. Trunk Routes — These are highly traveled corridors serving a variety of trip purposes and connect a variety of regional destinations. Trunk routes comprise the backbone of the network linking major communities. Examples include Line 111 with a 20-minute headway seven days a week, which travels from Palm Springs to Coachella; Line 14 between Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs; and Line 30 between Cathedral City and Palm Springs. Lines 14 and 30 operate with 20-minute frequencies on weekdays. Local Routes — Local routes are secondary routes that connect to the trunk routes and supplement the SunBus network. These connector and feeder routes include Lines 15, 21, 24, 32, , 54, 70, 80, 81, 90, 91, and 95. Local routes operate in areas with less density and lower demand. Local routes have consistent service throughout each day, frequencies of 60-minutes or better, and frequent stops for passengers to access as many destinations as possible. An exception to the above frequency is the North Shore Line 95 rural service that operates six round trips weekdays and weekends between Indio, Coachella, Mecca, and North Shore. Line 20 and 21 also has limited service that operates on weekdays only. Market -Based Services —Tailored to serve specific market segments at specific times of the day, including supplemental service such as school trippers, market -based routes have flexible routing and schedules that may vary throughout the day and week, and are 16 designed to meet specific market targets. Examples are the Commuter Link 220, operating three westbound trips from Palm Desert to Riverside with three return eastbound trips weekdays. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • I 1 ? U 1 S ? U 1 199H11119 rnaNsri ASINcr Additionally, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) or express bus service is currently under study. Presently, Line 111 takes close to an hour and half to travel between Palm Springs and Indio, and close to two hours to travel between Palm Springs to Coachella. A BRT or express service would reduce travel time and operating costs and support increased ridership. SunLine's existing Service Standards Policy also defines minimum service frequencies and spans deemed sustainable in the context of past funding levels. Due to the uncertain funding climate, declining ridership, and the emergence of promising new technologies, SunLine will revisit existing route alignments, including minimum service frequencies and spans, in consultation with the community and Board. 17 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 VIGURE Route 1.4 NUMMARY Route OF NUNLINE VIXED ROUTE TRANSIT Major Destinations NERVICES, JANUARY Cities/Communities ZIM Connections Classification �IIIIIIIIIL Shopping, Schools, DMV, Employment Center, Served Desert Hot Springs and 14 Trunk 15, 20, 24, 30 & 111 Library, Senior Center Palm Springs Shopping Centers, Senior Center, Library, Desert Hot Springs and 15 Local 14 Community Center, City Hall, Medical, and Schools Desert Edge Shopping, Senior Center, Library, Community Center, Desert Hot Springs, 14, 15, 32, 54, 111, Link 20 Local Rancho Mirage, Palm Schools 220 &Amtrak Desert Shopping, Medical, Library, City Hall, School, College, Desert Hot Springs, Palm 21 Local 14, 15, 32, 54, & 111 and Mall Desert 24 Local Shopping, Medical, Library, Social Services, Theaters Palm Springs 14, 30, 32, 111 & MBTA Shopping, Schools, Medical, Library, Senior Center, Palm Springs and 30 Trunk Airport, Court House, Social Security, Theaters, and 14, 24, 32, 111 & MBTA Cathedral City Public Social Services Palm Springs, Cathedral Shopping, School, College, Medical, Theaters, Mall 20, 24, 30, 54, 111, Link 32 Local City, Rancho Mirage, Palm and Hospital 220 &Amtrak Desert, Thousand Palms Palm Desert, Indian Wells, Shopping, School, Tennis Gardens, Work Force 20, 32, 111, Link 220 & 54 Local La Quinta, Indio, Bermuda Development, and College Amtrak Dunes La Quinta, Palm Desert, 70 Local Shopping, Schools, Theaters and Medical Indian Wells, Bermuda 111 & Amtrak Dunes Shopping, School, Workforce Development, Social 80 Local Indio 54, 81, 90, 91 & 111 Services, Senior Center, DMV, Hospital Shopping, Schools, Medical, Community Center, 54, 80, 90, 91, 111 & 81 Local College, DMV, Hospital, Work Force Development, Indio Greyhound Social Services and Employment Center Shopping, Library, City Hall, Senior Center, 90 Local Indio and Coachella 54, 80, 81, 91 & 111 Community Center, Social Services and Medical Shopping, College, Schools, Community Center, and Indio, Coachella, Thermal, 91 Local 54, 80, 81, 90 & 111 Medical Mecca, Oasis Shopping, College, Community Center, Medical and Indio, Coachella, Mecca 95 Local 90, 91 & 111 Schools and North Shore Palm Springs, Cathedral 14, 24, 20, 21, 30, 32, 54, Hospital, Medical, Shopping, College, Mall and City, Rancho Mirage, Palm 111 Trunk 70, 80, 81, 90& 91, 111, Schools Desert, Indian Wells, La Amtrak &MBTA Quinta, Indio Palm Desert, Rancho Mirage, Cabazon Casino, 20, 32, 54, 111, 220 Market -Based Mall, College, Shopping and University Metrolink, Pass Transit, Beaumont, Moreno RTA &Greyhound Valley, Riverside SUNBUs SERVICE FREQUENCY AND SPAN SunLine fixed route bus services operate 363 days a year, with no service provided on Thanksgiving and Christmas. The system operates Monday through Friday from 5:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and weekends from 5:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Weekend service is operated on New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, and Labor Day. The Commuter Link 220, 18 Line 20 and Line 21 service does not operate on weekends. Buses generally operate every 20 to 90 minutes, depending on the route and day of the week. Service span and frequency information by line is summarized in the route profiles. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH ► 9 fly is911 AG[IV CY PARATRANSIT SERVICE OVERVIEW SunLine operates SunDial ADA paratransit to provide service to those certified under ADA, who cannot ride fixed route bus service. Paratransit SunDial services continue to be well utilized for client's day to day activities, such as medical appointments and shopping. In FY 2016/2017, SunLine served 164,802 SunDial passenger boardings, a .5% increase from the previous year. In the same year, SunDial operated 1,031,486 miles and 68,941 hours of revenue service. SunDial operates within % of a mile on either side of the SunBus route network, and is available by advanced reservation only. Reservations may be made based on the service hours of the fixed routes serving passengers' origins and destinations, and may only be used at the same times, days and frequency as local fixed -route service. SunDial service is a curb - to -curb, shared ride transit service for persons who are functionally unable to use the fixed route service either permanently or under certain conditions. Eligibility is not solely based on having a disability. SunDial service is provided with a fleet of 37 vans seven days a week, 363 days a year during the same hours as the fixed route network. No service is provided on Thanksgiving and Christmas days. SunDial's Cancellation and No Show Policy went into effect on May 1, 2016. By implementing the policy revision, SunDial's late cancellation and no show rate decreased from 6.1% to 3.5% and from 5.8% to 3.3%, respectively. Since SunDial ADA paratransit service is not provided in the community of North Shore, Line 95 operates as a deviated fixed route. Curbside pick-ups and drop-offs are available on a reservation basis in North Shore. Riders may utilize this service with a 24-hour advance notice for both pick-ups and drop-offs. SunDial service can be arranged to meet Line 95 in Coachella at 51" Street and Vine Avenue for qualifying Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) passengers to reach other qualifying destinations in the Coachella Valley. As an operator of bus service, SunLine is required under the ADA to ensure that paratransit service is provided to eligible individuals with disabilities. The level of service provided must be comparable, in terms of hours of service and area served, to the service provided by the fixed route bus system. To be eligible, all persons must complete an application, describing in detail the nature of their mental or physical disability that may prevent the individual from using regular fixed route service. Applicants must obtain an approved health care professional's statement and signature verifying the disability. Each applicant is notified in writing of their application status within twenty-one days of the submission date. SunLine is currently revamping the eligibility process for SunDial in an effort to reduce costs to the Agency. Riders having the required ADA Certification Identification Card are eligible to use SunDial 19 for their transportation needs, including medical appointments, shopping, and other social activities. 199fli e SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • 1 0 1 S 2 0 1 rxaxsri ASINcr SunLine Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Services SunLine Transportation Demand Management (TDM) services promote and facilitate alternative mode of transportation such as transit, vanpool, carpool, bicycling, and taxi. Vanpool A vanpool is a group of people who are coming to the same workplace or post -secondary education facility (college, trade school, etc.) from the same community, riding together in a van. Vanpools typically carry from six to fifteen passengers, and operate weekdays, traveling between pick-up locations and a place of work. Vanpools provide small-scale commuter ridership in scenarios where operator costs would otherwise be prohibitively high. Operating costs are very low, because the passengers drive themselves. Ridership per platform hour is healthy; the vanpool doesn't run at all without a minimum of five regular riders. Vanpools are very demand -responsive; once ridership falls below a threshold, the service goes away and new routes can be added with a minimum of overhead. They can access office parking areas and other locations where scheduled SunLine service cannot reach, making for more convenient passenger drop-offs. Vanpool programs can be administered in a variety of ways, allowing the employer to be fully involved or simply promote it from the sidelines. Employers can help employees form vanpools through rideshare matching. Rideshare matching helps potential vanpoolers locate others nearby with similar schedules. With technology advancements, on -demand vanpooling may help reduce coordination costs and increase ridership. Traditional vanpool programs often have average ridership per trip at just above the minimum membership required for the vanpool. As the region develops unevenly, vanpools will be an increasingly effective means to serve trips from low -density places to employment and education centers. With new vanpool programs, SunLine may be able to pull back bus service from low -volume, coverage routes, and focus on more frequent, trunk routes and core services. SunLine's Vanpool Program will provide a subsidy for qualified vans. The driver of the vanpool must be a participant in the vanpool program. Vanpool passengers will be responsible for paying the van lease cost minus the subsidy. They will also share the cost of gas, toll fees, and parking fees (if applicable). Passengers will not pay for the maintenance and insurance costs. Vehicles for this type of service will be leased by one of the pre - qualified vendors to one of the commuters in the group, a company, or by a third party representative. Micro Transit SunLine proposes a new approach to connect riders to mainline service by bridging the first mile, last mile gap. Many communities still experience a lack of transportation options that 20 require innovative solutions. This flexible, on demand rideshare service is designed to connect riders to the fixed route system by providing point to point rides along identified fixed route corridors. SunLine has purchased the scheduling application and anticipates having this service in place by the fall of 2018. Work is already underway to determine a SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • I Y ? 0 1 S ? 0 1 9 1YMflJ1,gg rnaNsri ASINcr pilot service area to test the attributes of the program before launching this service more widely within the transit service area. CURRENT FARE STRUCTURE The SunBus fare structure is summarized in Figure 1.5. SunBus passengers pay the adult fare unless eligible for discounted fares, which are available to seniors, people with disabilities, and youth. Children 4 years and under ride free with an adult fare. Fares may be paid using cash or passes. FIGURE 1.5 SUNBUs FARE STRUCTURE FIGURE 1.6 SUNDIAL FARE STRUCTURE Personal care attendants and service animals may accompany an eligible customer at no additional charge. The client must inform the reservationist when booking their trip that they will be accompanied by another person to determine if space is available. Clients may travel with up to three companions who will be charged the applicable fare. 21 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 P19 FIGURE 1.7 COMMUTER LINK FARE STRUCTURE Commuter Express fares are for trips between the Coachella Valley and Western Riverside County on the Riverside Commuter Link 220 Service. Proposed Fare Modifications and Plans for Promoting Ridership Fares and fare collection will be reviewed in FY 2018/2019 with a goal of sustaining the future level of transit operations in the Coachella Valley while also maximizing ridership. SunLine is exploring partnerships with local colleges throughout the Coachella Valley to provide an affordable transit haul pass program. Taxi Voucher Program In addition to SunDial , SunLine offers a Taxi Voucher Program providing half price taxi trips for seniors (60+ years) and the disabled. This card is easily obtained by eligible patrons submitting an application to SunLine. Once the application is reviewed and accepted, the patron is then mailed an activated payment card. When the patron receives that card they are able to call in an add a balance of up to $75 per month. SunLine provides matching funds in equal amount up to the $75. The total balance added for each month can be a maximum of $150. Leftover funds from previous months are carried over until utilized. To use the balance, the patrons simply order a cab and pay their fare with the Taxi Voucher payment card. This service assists with the economic development of the 3 taxi franchises of the Coachella Valley and provides some relief to the demands on the paratransit services. Community members are enjoying the service, and Taxi cab drivers and their franchises appreciate how this service keeps them competitive with other ride share services in the area. The Taxi Voucher Program has been funded with Section 5310 Transportation for Elderly Persons and Persons with Disabilities funding. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH ► 9 (xis911 AsfNCY PASS OUTLETS SunLine currently has 19 pass outlet locations within the service area. They sell nine different pass types: day pass, 31-day pass, 10-ride pass, adult, senior and youth. Figure 1.8 lists pass outlet locations: FIGURE 1.8 PASS OUTLET LOCATIONS Canyon Food Mart Cathedral City 30 & 111 Cardenas Cathedral City 30 & 32 Desert Market Desert Hot Springs 14 & 15 Desert Food Mart Desert Hot Springs 14 & 15 COD Bookstore - Indio Campus Indio 54 Indio City Hall Indio 54 & 81 U-Save Market Indio 80 & 90 Rancho Fresco Market Indio 80 & 81 Guerrero's Meat Market Indio 80, 81 & 111 Cardenas Indio 80, 81 & 111 La Quinta Wellness Center La Quinta 70 Cardenas Coachella 90 & 111 Carniceria Atoyac Palm Desert 111 COD Bookstore Palm Desert 20, 21, 32, & 111 Instant Cash Palm Desert 111 Mizell Senior Center Palm Springs 14, 24 & 30 Palm Springs Liquor Palm Springs 24& 111 Don Carlos Meat Market Mecca 91 & 95 SunLine Transit Agency Thousand Palms 32 REVENUE FLEET SunLine currently has an active fleet of 76 fixed route buses. New vehicle purchases are included in SunLine's fleet and facilities plan as seen in Figure 1.9. 23 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 FIGURE 1.9 SUNBus FIXED RoUTE FLEET Numberof Vehicles 13 Manufacturer Orion V Year 2006 FuelType CNG Size (Fleet) 40 16 New Flyer 2008 CNG 40 21 New Flyer B 2008 CNG 40 10 El Dorado 2009 CNG 32 0 FC 2/New Flyer 2010 Hydrogen 40 1 FC 3/El Dorado 2012 Hydrogen 40 3 BYD Electric 2014 Electric 40 2 FC4&5/EI Dorado 2014 Hydrogen 40 1 FC6/EI Dorado 2015 Hydrogen 40 6 New Flyer Excelsior 2016 CNG 40 4 FC7 - FC10 El Dorado 2018 Hydrogen 40 All buses meet accessibility requirements of the ADA, and the emission mitigation standards mandated by the Federal Clean Air Act, and the California Air Resources Board (CARB). New vehicle models must proceed through the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) First Article Bus Durability Test Program in order for procurements to qualify for federal funding participation. FTA guidelines establish the useful life expectancy of a large, heavy- duty transit bus as at least 12 years of service, or an accumulation of at least 500,000 miles. SunLine is expected to receive four new BYD electric buses (3 replacement and 1 expansion vehicle) in the coming months. These buses will support cleaner and more frequent service on SunLine routes serving disadvantaged communities, accelerating SunLine's efforts to transition to an all zero -emission fleet. Paratransit SunLine's paratransit service presently operates with an active fleet of 37 ADA vehicles. The paratransit fleet is summarized in Figure 1.10. FTA guidelines establish the useful life expectancy of a paratransit vehicle as at least four years or an accumulation of 100,000 miles. FIGURE 1.10 SUNDIAL PARATRANSIT FLEET 6 FORD/Aerotech 220 2013 CNG 24 8 FORD/Aerotech 220 2013 CNG 24 8 FORD/Aerotech 220 2015 CNG 24 15 FORD/Aerotech 220 2016 CNG 24 Support Vehicles 24 SunLine currently utilizes 52 support vehicles including standard passenger cars and trucks as well as facility -specific golf carts and forklifts. The support fleet are used for various activities to support transit services provided throughout the Coachella Valley. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH ► 9 (xis911 As[IV CY EXISTING FACILITIES Administrative and Operating Facilities Figure 1.11 presents SunLine's administrative and operations facilities. SunLine owns all facilities. FIGURE 1.11 SUNLINE FACILITIES .. V SunLine Division 1 Facility 32-505 Harry Oliver Trail Thousand Palms SunLine Division 2 Facility 83255 Hiahwav 111 Indio Figure 1.12 represents SunLine's park and ride facility which is owned by SunLine. FIGURE 1.12 SUNLINE PARK -AND -RIDE LOCATIONS htmm� Thousand Palms 172-480 Varner Road (SunLine Transit Facility 1 22 1 220 Stops and Facilities SunLine's bus system has 635 stops including 361 shelters and 19 inactive shelters, that staff maintains which are planned for relocation. There are 80 standalone benches and waste containers and 14 major transfer locations, where riders are able to make transfers connections between routes. Figures 1.13 and 1.14 indicate the top ten (10) stops served for weekday and weekend service respectively. FIGURE 1.13 WEEKDAY SERVICE: "dLst op Name B St/Buddy Rodgers TOP 10 STOPS SERVED C ity Cathedral City Numberof •- per Day 682 Hwy 111/Flower Indio 493 Indian Canyon/Ramon Palm Springs 461 Palm Canyon/Stevens Palm Springs 391 Baristo/Farrell South Side of Street Palm Springs 353 West/Pierson Desert Hot Springs 317 Town Center/Hahn East Side Palm Desert 284 Palm Can on/Baristo Palm Springs 216 Town Center/Hahn West Side Palm Desert 203 Ramon/San Luis Rey North Side Palm Springs 175 25 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN - F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 26 FIGURE 1.14 WEEKEND SERVICE: .. Name B St/Buddy Rodgers TOP 10 STOPS SERVED C ity Cathedral City Number of Riders per D. 488 Hwy 111/Flower Indio 380 Palm Canyon/Stevens Palm Springs 315 Indian Canyon/Ramon La Quinta 298 Town Center/Hahn East Side Palm Desert 216 5th/Vine Coachella 189 Town Center/Hahn West Side Palm Desert 157 Baristo/Farrell South Side Palm Springs 155 Palm Can on/Baristo Palm Springs 150 West/Pierson Desert Hot Springs 150 PLANNED FACILITIES SunLine contracted with HDR, Inc. to examine and understand the Agency's current and planned future transit operations, and the roles and places of its existing transit facilities and vehicle maintenance and storage sites. From this review, SunLine developed an overall long range facilities master plan that identifies the bus storage and maintenance facility requirements, and potential locations for SunLine for the period of 2016— 2035. This master plan is a guide for SunLine's facilities future uses and associated capital projects. Operations Facility SunLine's Operations facility located in Thousand Palms is housed in a combination of five pre -fabricated units of various sizes (approximately 2,000 square feet in total) with drivers' lunchroom, lounge and training area housed in two separate double pre -fabricated units (2,800 square feet in total). The operations center houses dispatch, transit control and the paratransit call center as well as the operations supervisors' offices. The facility is undersized for its purpose and staff levels. Preliminary planning has begun for the design, demolition and removal of the facility, and construction of a new, accessible facility. BUS SHELTERS Twenty-five new bus shelters will be installed in fall 2018 in the jurisdictions indicated in Figure 1.15: SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUHI► 9 (HRNS17 AGf NCY FIGURE 1.15 NEW BUS SHELTERS BY JURISDICTION (2018) Jurisdictions Number Cathedral City of Shelters 2 Coachella 2 Desert Hot Springs 2 Indian Wells 0 Indio 4 La Quinta 2 Palm Desert 4 Palm Springs 4 Rancho Mirage 0 Riverside County Unincorporated Areas 5 FUTURE TRANSIT HUBS SunLine is working with the City of Coachella, Department of Social Services and Affordable Housing on a proposed project to be developed east of Harrison Street south of 4t" Street and north of 61" Street in the City of Coachella. EXISTING COORDINATION BETWEEN TRANSIT AGENCIES AND PRIVATE PROVIDERS As the designated Consolidated Transportation Services Agency (CTSA), SunLine coordinates public transportation services throughout its service area. Staff participates in meetings with social and human service agencies, consumers, and grassroots advocates through forums such as the RCTC Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Service Transportation Advisory Council (CCAC), SunLine's ACCESS Advisory Committee, San Gorgonio Pass Area - Transportation Now Coalition (T-NOW), and neighboring transit operators. SunLine remains committed to working with the ACCESS Advisory Committee. Staff hosts regular meetings at the Thousand Palms Administrative Office. SunLine applies input from the Committee to improve relationships with the community to address public transportation issues in the Valley. Additionally, staff members are actively involved in the regional transportation planning process through participation on RCTC and county committees. These committees include the CAC/Social Service Transportation Advisory Council, the Technical Advisory Committee, Aging & Disability Resource Connection ADRC of Riverside Long Term Services and Supports (LLTS) Coalition, Desert Valley Builders Association (DVBA), and related committees to enhance coordination efforts with SunLine. 27 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 COORDINATION WITH OTHER PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PROVIDERS In addition to providing transit service throughout the Coachella Valley, SunLine offers transit connections to a number of adjacent transit operators. SunLine and Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) collaborate to schedule the operation of Commuter Link 220 which connects Palm Desert and Thousand Palms with Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Beaumont, Banning, Moreno Valley, and Riverside Metrolink Station via Interstate 10 and State Route 60. In addition to providing connections to RTA routes, Commuter Link 220 joins rides to Pass Transit services in Beaumont and Metrolink's Riverside and Inland Empire -Orange County lines. SunLine also hosts Morongo Basin Transit Authority (MBTA) Routes 12 and 15 through a cooperative service agreement at its stops in downtown Palm Springs. The collaboration offers connections to Yucca Valley, Landers, Joshua Tree, and Twentynine Palms. SunLine is collaborating with Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency (PVVTA) on their Rides to Wellness demonstration project known as the Blythe Wellness Express service. This service, launched in July 2017, operates three days weekly and travels to the Coachella Valley's three hospitals (Desert Regional Medical Center, Eisenhower Medical Center and J.F.K. Hospital) within SunLine's service area. Amtrak California (operated by Amtrak bus contractors) transports rail passengers traveling between rail hubs at certain Amtrak stations using SunLine's bus stops in Palm Springs, Palm Desert, and La Quinta, under an additional cooperative service agreement. Amtrak's "Sunset Limited" inter -city train serves the Palm Springs Station on North Indian Canyon Drive. However, with rail service only serving Palm Springs three times a week in each direction, it is impractical for SunLine to offer transit service to the station at this time. SunLine has been collaborating with Imperial Valley Transportation Commission (IVTC) in an effort to find a future connection with Imperial Valley Transit (IVT). IVTC oversees the regional transportation services and programs provided by IVT in the southern California areas of Brawley, Calexico, Imperial, West Shores and El Centro. SunLine coordinates with Greyhound to enable Greyhound bus service to provide pick up and drop off services at the SunLine Thousand Palms Transit Hub located at 72-480 Varner Road. Greyhound serves the hub with three westbound trips and three eastbound trips each day. PRIVATE TRANSPORTATION Taxi Administration The SunLine Regulatory Administration (SRA), is responsible for establishing and enforcing ethical standards maintained by the Franchising Board. In addition, SRA is charged with 28 licensing and regulating taxicab franchises and drivers in the Coachella Valley, while also ensuring residents and visitors are charged a fair and reasonable price. Figure 1.16 represents the current operating taxi franchises in the Coachella Valley along with the number of vehicles operated by each franchise. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • I Y ? 0 1 S ? 0 1 9 1yMfl11,gg rnaNsri ASINcr FIGURE 1.16 TAXI FRANCHISES American Cab 30 Desert City Cab 40 Yellow Cab of the Desert 53 29 S►►►►L►ne (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 30 CHAPTER 2: EXISTING SERVICE AND ROUTE PERFORMANCE INTRODUCTION In FY 2016/2017, SunLine served 4.1 million fixed route passenger boardings, a decrease of 4.8%from the previous year. In the same year, it operated over 3,467,182 miles and 238,374 hours of revenue service. SunLine's ridership decline in fixed route bus service is consistent with national trends. Transit ridership has decreased in almost every major city and suburb. SunDial paratransit service continues to be well utilized for client's day to day activities, such as medical appointments, shopping, or work. In FY 2016/2017, SunLine served almost 150,301 trips, a 2% increase from FY 2015/2016. FIXED ROUTE SERVICE — ROUTE BY ROUTE ANALYSIS Little data exists to corroborate which global causes are impacting SunLine most significantly. There has been much speculation about the effect of low gas prices, increased car ownership, ride -hailing services and services which offer delivery of groceries, fast food and goods as contributing factors to decreased fixed route ridership. Figure 2.1 displays the comparison in ridership from FY 2015/2016 to FY 2016/2017. FIGURE 2.1 ANNUAL COMPARISON OF SUNBUS RIDERSHIP SunLine is analyzing effects attributable to the quantity and quality of transit services. Ridership may be falling if service is getting slower due to congestion or if there are recurring, on -time performance issues. We also seek to understand why SunLine ridership has declined less steeply than other transit operators. Figure 2.2 presents ridership for five (5) years, from FY 2012/13 to FY 2016/17. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH ► 9 (HRNS17 AGf NCY FIGURE 2.2 FIXED ROUTE RIDERSHIP Fixed Route Ridership Comparisons - 5 Years 455,000 , 1, , d, . .. I., , 406,000 355,000 305,000 255,000 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov ❑ec Jar. FeL. Mar Apr M-y Jur Service Efficiency and Effectiveness To determine the efficiency and effectiveness of all routes, staff reviewed the performance statistics for FY 2016/2017 with data from the transit monitoring software TransTrack. Figure 2.3 below summarizes data by line. Data available includes passenger boardings, passengers per revenue hour, cost per passenger, passenger revenue per revenue hour, and the farebox recovery ratio. 31 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN - F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 32 FIGURE 2.3 ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE STATISTICS, FY 2016/2017 PASSENGER .AIL COUNTPER MIL 629,697 PASSENGERS REVENUE HOUR 21.4 COSTA• PASSENGER $5.29 REVENUE PER REVENUE HOUR $31.01 :•RECOVERY RATIO 27.35% 104,060 19.1 $5.95 $27.28 24.05% 25,062 10.3 $11.00 $14.87 13.11 % 161,799 14.8 $7.67 $21.42 18.85% 686,776 24.5 $4.62 $35.68 31.46% 248,350 14.7 $7.71 $21.29 18.77% 48,901 6.5 $17.60 $9.41 8.19% 75,157 11.1 $10.21 $16.07 14.17% 180,326 18.3 $6.19 $26.23 23.15% 141,170 25.5 $4.45 $36.97 32.64% 89,266 15.1 $7.48 $21.67 19.13% ' 140,831 11.9 $9.51 $17.56 15.48% 181,092 10.8 $10.52 $15.49 13.64% 28,556 4.5 $25.32 $6.60 5.81% 1,396,966 19.7 $5.75 $28.73 25.34% 13,458 3.4 $33.63 $4.87 4.30% 164,802 2.4 $35.39 $9.94 11.74% PARATRANSIT SERVICE - SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Customer growth on SunLine's paratransit services continues steadily. Like many transit systems across the country, SunLine faces challenges in providing cost-effective service for disabled customers who are unable to use traditional buses. In FY 2015/2016, SunLine served almost 153,183 trips, a 7% increase from FY 2014/2015. Overall ridership for the demand response and subscription services is expected to continue to grow. FIGURE 2.4 ANNUAL COMPARISON OF SUNDIAL RIDERSHIP SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH ► 9 (xis911 AG[IV CY FIGURE 2.5 MONTHLY COMPARISON OF SUNDIAL RIDERSHIP SunDial Ridership Comparison - 5 Years FY 12/13 -FY 13/14 - FY 14/15 - FY 15/16 -FY 16/17 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,0a0 8,000 6,000 4,00a 2,000 a Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jur. KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS To ensure adherence to the Productivity Improvement Program (PIP) established by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), SunLine continues to monitor and evaluate routes to guarantee compliance with key performance indicators. The performance indicators are monitored using TransTrack software implemented by RCTC for all Riverside County transit operators. Over the past six years, SunLine has consistently met the compliance requirements for both mandatory and discretionary performance indicators. SunLine is on track to meet the following targets for FY 2017/2018: Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour Subsidy Per Passenger Mile Subsidy Per Hour Subsidy Per Mile Passengers Per Revenue Hour Passenger Per Revenue Mile SunLine has not yet met the following targets for FY 2017/2018: Farebox Recovery Ratio Subsidy Per Passenger SunLine will continue to work closely with RCTC to meet the key performance indicators 33 and to ensure targets are set by a process in keeping with industry standards. siding (Nis NIf A8[IV ry SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 34 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS Since the 2015 update to the COA, SunLine has made improvements to all fixed routes, including realigning existing routes and improving frequency to enhance ridership. The following modifications were made in the past fiscal year to fixed route bus service: • Interlining of Lines 14 and 30, weekdays only. • Line 20 Express extended service from 1-10 to Cook, Fred Waring to Town Center and removed service along Monterey between 1-10 to Fred Waring. Express service operates during peak hours only on weekdays. • New to fixed route service is Line 21 which replaced Line 53. Line 21 serves Town Center, Fred Waring and Cook to Gerald Ford and provides limited service between 11:00 a.m. and 4 p.m. (in between Line 20 peak service in Palm Desert) on weekdays. • Line 53 was removed with ridership absorbed by Express Line 20 and Line 21. • Line 80 was realigned to serve Calhoun, Dr. Carreon, Van Buren and Ave. 48. Part of the Line 80 was removed along Jackson and Dr. Carreon between Calhoun and Jackson. In the May 2018 service change Line 80 was improved to add 30 minute frequency and realigned to serve the North Indio Walmart shopping center. • Line 90 and 91 were realigned to commence service at 5th and Vine in Coachella with the section of service from Highway 111 and Flower removed to reduce duplication of service. In May 2018, Line 91 added four (4) trips to commence at Highway 111 and Flower. • Improved frequency from forty (40) minutes to thirty (30) minutes before 6 a.m. and every twenty minutes past 6 p.m. on Line 111 for weekdays. • Afternoon school trippers have been absorbed by Lines 14, 30 and 111 (regularly scheduled routes). SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • I Y ? 0 1 S ? 0 1 `> S►►r►1►►►e rn'"911 ASINcr FIGURE 2.6 MONTHLY COMPARISON OF SYSTEM RIDERSHIP 500,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 System Ridership Comparison - 5 Years FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Staff continues to coordinate with local jurisdictions to determine best practices in relation to transit services provided throughout the Coachella Valley. Staff will continue monitoring existing routes; applying service warrants to evaluate route performance. In addition to concentrating on modifying and adjusting existing routes, the review of underperforming routes will continue to determine if segment realignment, trip modifications or discontinuation of service should be considered due to low productivity. Service Standards and Warrants The factors listed below are considered when analyzing new service proposals and requests, as well as evaluating existing service. Area Coverage While most of the urbanized sections of SunLine's service area are adequately served, there are some areas which are provided with more service than others. When service is proposed, the new line will be evaluated based on its proximity to other lines and the necessity of its implementation based on area coverage and service productivity standards. Areas that are not currently served or are underserved, but warrant new or enhanced service will be evaluated to receive new transit service when funding becomes available or through efficiency improvements of the existing transit lines. Growth in the ADA paratransit service area must also be addressed as part of any new service planning. Funding of these types of services must be prioritized along with improvements to existing transit services, based on available funding. MarketArea Characteristics Staff also considers the density and demographic characteristics of a given service area as an important determinant for providing transit success. In tying area coverage standards to population and employment densities, SunLine recognizes the need to provide more service within more highly developed areas, and often considers this factor as part of the service development process. siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 Transit -Dependent Populations SunLine considers the effects of service changes on transit -dependent riders during service planning processes. While SunLine's current network serves most transit -dependent populations and their destinations effectively, the agency continues to examine transit dependency when evaluating new service proposals. Special Market Needs Staff often receives requests for new service when existing routes do not adequately address unique market opportunities. Some examples include short routes such as shuttles that may better connect two or more high demand destinations, such as a transit center and an employment center, a senior center and a shopping complex, or student housing and a university campus. They may also provide local circulation between destinations in a single community with the service span and frequency tailored to these unique markets. Service Standards of Evaluating New Services Once a route is implemented, performance monitoring begins immediately to determine if the route is reaching its desired potential and performance standards. New service routes not meeting minimum standards are subject to the same remedial actions as existing services requiring evaluation at the eighteen to twenty-four month marks, may be truncated or eliminated if line productivity does not improve. MAJOR TRIP GENERATORS & PROJECTED GROWTH Many transit trips within the Coachella Valley are destined for the City of Palm Desert, with 23 percent of all work trips ending there. Data compiled for trip purposes show trip patterns to Palm Desert are mostly from the Cities of Cathedral City, Indio, La Quinta, and Palm Springs. There are also strong trip patterns from La Quinta and Coachella to Indio, and from Desert Hot Springs to Palm Springs. Most trips in the system occur along Highway 111, with nearly all destinations served directly by Line 111. Line 14 (Desert Hot Springs — Palm Springs) and Line 30 (Cathedral City — Palm Springs) are also key SunLine transit lines. With respect to school travel, Palm Desert continues to be a key destination as the location of the main campus of the College of the Desert (COD). SunLine also provides public transportation services for middle and high school students for school districts that are unable to provide transportation. SunLine schedules special school -tripper buses to accommodate the public transportation demand and school bell schedule for school districts including the Palm Springs Unified School District (PSUSD) and Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD). SunLine staff coordinates with local jurisdictions to provide recommendations for adequate transit considerations as new developments and construction projects are proposed. 36 Through this process, SunLine attempts to reshape the community land use development patterns to support cost-effective transit, biking, and walking mobility in concert with both Smart Growth and the SB 375 GHG initiative. As the Coachella Valley flourishes, SunLine staff will continue to assess travel patterns and transit demands. Additionally, to assist SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 S►►r►1► g r Niss17 AGf NCY commuting students, SunLine will continue to coordinate public transit schedules with school bell times. EQUIPMENT, PASSENGER AMENITIES AND FACILITY NEEDS Passenger Amenities and Bus Stop Improvement Program As of January 2018, SunLine serves 635 bus stops, which are cleaned and maintained on a regular basis. Since completion of the 2005 COA and 2009 COA Update, SunLine has made significant improvements to bus stops in the Coachella Valley as part of its Bus Stop Improvement Program (BSIP). SunLine has successfully completed five phases of the BSIP. Presently, 361 bus stops have shelters. Funding was received in FY 2015/2016 to allow 25 new shelters to be placed at active stop locations as part of Phase 6 of the BSIP. In conjunction with the installation of new shelters, bus stops are also improved to meet guidelines set forth by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Additional funding has been requested for continual support of the BSIP in upcoming years. Real -Time Signage Displays SunLine introduced real-time arrival information display at the major transfer point located at Town Center at Hahn in Palm Desert. This new technology data combined with digital signage is creating new ways for SunLine to communicate with its riders. SunLine installed two real-time displays at major layovers located at Indian Canyon and Ramon in Palm Springs and Highway 111 at Flower in Indio. SunLine will also be exploring other potential locations for real-time displays. On -Board Passenger Amenities SunLine continues to offer free Wi-Fi on all fixed route buses. All SunLine buses have electronic destination signs. The signs indicate the route number, route name, and the destination of the bus. All of the buses have display racks for public announcements, notices and timetables. Passengers are able to request a stop by activating the stop request that is controlled by a plastic strip/pull cord located within each passenger's reach. All buses are ADA compliant. Air conditioning and heating are provided on the buses for passenger comfort. Bicycle Facilities To provide bicyclists an alternate mode for traveling throughout the Coachella Valley, all of SunLine's fixed route buses have exterior mounted bike racks. The combination of bicycling and riding the bus has increased the range of options for riders who utilize other modes of transportation. On -Board Security Cameras Cameras and the associated video recording equipment are installed on all SunLine fixed route buses. Video recording provides an invaluable asset when assessing the cause of collisions, investigating reports of improper behavior by SunLine staff and violations of SunLine rider rules by our passengers. Video from on -board cameras has also proven to be 37 beneficial to law enforcement in the investigation of traffic incidents and criminal activity. Additionally, our paratransit vans are equipped with "SmartDrive" video monitoring. SmartDrive video recordings assist in determining the cause of collisions and 199fli e SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • 1 0 1 S 2 0 1 rxaxsri ASINcr " helps identify operator driving habits and tendencies. SmartDrive video is used to coach better driving habits and skills to our paratransit operators. Streaming live video links were added to vehicles in use on Commuter Link 220. Bus Replacement Program Approximately every three years, SunLine begins the replacement of ADA paratransit vans as they near 150,000 miles. In FY 2018, 13 replacement and three expansion vehicles were delivered to SunLine. The fixed route bus fleet began to be updated in 2017, as fifteen 2005 Orion buses become eligible for replacement under FTA guidelines (12-year lifespan or 500,000 miles). SunLine was awarded in FY 2013, by discretionary grant funding to expand the hydrogen fleet by five buses; the construction of these buses are set to commence in mid-2018. All SunLine vehicles, including non -revenue service vehicles, are powered with alternative fuels. Facility Needs CNG Station: The CNG station will be located at the Thousand Palms facility and will replace the existing station that has exceeded its useful life. Preliminary drawings have been completed. SunLine is in the process of procuring a design build firm that will provide a fully commissioned CNG station with the goal to have this project breaking ground in summer 2018. Hydrogen Station: SunLine is in the process of upgrading its existing hydrogen refueling station with a new electrolyzer. Preliminary drawings are complete for the hydrogen fueling station. Equipment for the fueling station is being built off -site. The hydrogen fueling station is expected to be commissioned by the fall of 2018. Thousand Palms Administration Building Solar Canopies: Preliminary drawings have been completed and approved with a Design Build firm being procured. This project is expected to be completed by the end of calendar year 2018. Operations Facility Replacement: The Operations Facility Replacement will allow SunLine to complete demolition, removal and rebuild an operations building in Thousand Palms. The architectural and engineering firm has been selected to provide preliminary engineering drawings that will be used for the selection of a design build firm. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN " I Y ? 0 1 S ? 0 1 `> S�%�%r�%1�%�%�%e rn'"911 ASINcr CHAPTER 3: SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION INTRODUCTION In July of 2017, SunLine Transit Agency adopted a Rethink Transit Campaign. The purpose of the campaign is to identify savings by reallocating resources to productive bus lines, and developing sustainable solutions to serve areas with fewer riders. By reallocating resources to productive services, ridership and passenger revenue will increase easing financial constraints that inhibit growth. The campaign was adopted in response to three consecutive years of declining passenger ridership and revenue. The decline was caused by a national trend in stagnate transit growth, fairly moderate motor fuel prices, an increase in automobile ownership by low income residents in Southern California, and increasing competition from the private sector that has resulted in more choices being made available to local transit passengers. Rethink Transit has led to a Transit Redesign that includes realigning or partially replacing existing services that consistently exhibited low productivity. Other services may be replaced in the future by alternative mobility formats such as vanpools, or demand response, shared ride services that use smaller, flexible vehicles that are suited for less densely populated areas. More productive services will be improved by faster running times and more frequencies that will encourage wider use of those services. HDR is facilitating a study for SunLine Transit Redesign and Network Analysis that will evaluate the current schedule modifications and make recommendations for longer term sustainability. The study will also consider unmet transit needs, and make recommendations for growth during the next 10 years. Further, the study will review fares and recommend adjustments. HDR will produce the study by the end of 2018. HDR is a national transportation firm that will employ comparisons of other transit properties of comparable size to SunLine to determine best practices for future growth. TransLoc will perform a micro -transit simulation that will enable SunLine to launch a pilot program for share ride services in areas of light density where traditional transit applications have demonstrated low productivity. RECENT SERVICE CHANGES SunLine implemented the first phase of Rethink Transit in January 2018 by making the following revisions to SunBus schedules: • Interlining - continue to increase operational efficiencies by interlining routes such as Line 14 and 30 for weekday service. • Line 20 Express - extends service from 1-10 to Cook, Fred Waring to Town Center 39 and removed service along Monterey between 1-10 to Fred Waring. The Express Service operates only during peak hours on weekdays. siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 " Line 21 - new route that serves Town Center, Fred Waring, and Cook to Gerald Ford with limited service between 11:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on weekdays only. " Line 53 - replaced with Line 20 to absorb part of the line, and maintain mid -day service by implementing Line 21. Ended weekday/weekend service on Line 53 due to low ridership. " Line 80 - realigned to include service on Calhoun, Dr. Carreon, Van Buren and Avenue 48 in Indio. Removed service on Jackson and Dr. Carreon between Calhoun and Jackson. " Line 90 - commenced service at 5t"/Vine in Coachella. Removed service from Jackson, Hwy 111/Flower and Calhoun in Indio. Removed service from Ave. 52, Van Buren and to Ave. 51 loop with frequency every 60 minutes. " Line 91 - commenced service at 51"/Vine in Coachella. Remove service from Hwy 111/Flower to 51"/Vine on Hwy 111, Indio Blvd., Van Buren, Ave. 49, Frederick, and Ave. 50 for both eastbound and westbound directions. " Line 111- increased frequency from 40 to 30 minutes before 6:00 a.m. and every 20 minutes past 6:00 a.m. for early morning weekday service. " Absorbed unproductive afternoon trippers on Lines 14, 30 and 111 by regularly scheduled services. The May 2018 Service Change continued revision of fixed route schedules to maximize efficiencies and introduce service improvements. " Line 80  Improved frequency from every 60 to every 30 minutes, and realigned the route to provide service closer to the Walmart Shopping Center in North Indio. " Line 111 improved running times. PLANNED SERVICE CHANGES AND IMPLEMENTATION The strength of SunLine's network lies in its frequent, regional trunk routes. Lines 14, 30, and 111 together account for 64% of all daily boardings. Improving these services will increase farebox revenue on the entire network. Rethink Transit will incorporate improvements, initially to Line 111 with other enhancements to follow. Future planned service changes include: " Realign Line 15 with service modifications to Desert Edge. " Replace Line 95 with a new Line 96 with a demand response micro transit service. " Introduce Quick Bus, a limited stop service to reduce running time on Line 111. 40 " Add more frequency on Lines 14, 30 and 111. " Evaluate service span of lines to create efficiencies. " Collaborate with other service providers to create more regional mobility, such as service from the Coachella Valley to San Bernardino. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN " F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH �% 9 (HRNS17 AGf NCY " Consideration is being made in the possibility of replacing the Palm Springs BUZZ with transit service. " Potential realignment of Lines 111 and 70 to serve the Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival, Stagecoach Festival and BNP Paribas Open respectively. " Staff will continue monitoring existing routes applying service warrants to evaluate route performance. In addition to concentrating on modifying and adjusting existing routes, the review of underperforming routes will continue to determine if segment realignment, trip modifications or discontinuation of service should be considered due to low productivity. " Introduction of micro -transit in lightly populated areas where traditional transit is not appropriate, for example, to replace Line 95 with smaller, more flexible vehicles with demand response services. Consideration is also being given with respect to micro -transit fulfilling first mile, last mile demand in the service area of Lines 20 and 21. " A veteran based service is in the early stages of planning. This service will be provided as an option to veterans who are seeking transportation for medical treatment. " Realignment of Lines 90, 91, 95 and 111 to serve the future Coachella Transit Hub facility. MODIFICATIONS TO PARATRANSIT SERVICE The provision of ADA services remains a challenge because it is costly. Efforts to mitigate the increasing expenses in demand -responsive service include revisions to the paratransit eligibility/certification process and continuing to monitor late cancellations and no-shows, which improves the availability of appointment time slots and makes SunDial service more efficient for customers. SunDial staff periodically measure (monthly) the system -wide average rate for that month to determine whether a particular customer has excessive late cancellations or no-shows. The Agency then considers the customer's overall frequency of use and evaluates whether there is "a pattern of abuse" relative to how often that customer travels with SunDial. SunDial is moving forward with the paratransit eligibility/certification process to implement in -person interviews to ensure paratransit riders qualify for the service. MTM, Inc. has been contracted as the consulting firm to help reform the current processes. They are evaluating the Agency's current procedures and will be making recommendations to help implement changes. SunLine also plans to implement new technology in the near future to facilitate on-line scheduling and cancelling of paratransit reservations. The new technology will provide a reminder call the day before to encourage cancelling when plans change and will also provide customers with notification 5 minutes prior to passenger pickup. MARKETING PLANS AND PROMOTION Marketing is an essential element of a cost-effective public transit service. A focused 41 marketing effort using a modest budget is key in ensuring that the substantial public SHH11W SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN " 1 0 1 S 2 0 1 9 rxaxsri ASINcr resources used by a transit service are well utilized. SunLine will increase marketing in order to expand ridership through a cost-effective strategy using local media: • Enhance Ease of Use - pursued through a combination of streamlined routing and schedules, an improved passenger information program and a system -wide signage program. • Increase Awareness and Enhance Image of SunLine Transit Agency -will include strategies to increase overall visibility of the transit network and to make potential riders more aware of what services are available and how to access them. • Transit User Group Presentations — staff will continue to make personal presentations to local transit user groups, such as senior centers, disabled groups, schools, and civic groups and to educate about the destinations available through the service. • Expanded Pass Outlets - expanding the number of outlets to ease the ability of users to purchase monthly passes. • Implement Strategic Marketing Plan - SunLine proposes developing a marketing plan with long-range marketing goals and implementation strategies to assist with retaining and attracting customers. SunLine will continue to provide an Internet webpage that includes rider information, links to other cities, current schedules and routes, and bus stop locations. This marketing tool is updated as changes to the system are implemented. SunLine continues to follow its robust marketing and outreach campaign. Throughout FY 2018/2019 the Marketing and Planning teams will join community service events, seminars and conventions to spread the positive impact local transit service has in the Coachella Valley. The marketing efforts shall be conducted to ensure that all service area residents are aware of SunLine services. Targeted marketing efforts shall be conducted for high potential groups, including elderly, disabled, and low-income residents. BUDGET IMPACTS ON PROPOSED CHANGES Due to funding shortfalls and current economic conditions in the state of California and at the federal level, staff is currently scoping a planning study to evaluate service efficiencies and modifications to be implemented in January 2018. Existing funded projects are listed in Chapter 1, System Overview. Proposed service 42 improvements without identified funding may be implemented as new funding opportunities become available. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • I Y ? 0 1 S ? 0 1 9 1YMfl11,gg rnaNsri ASINcr CHAPTER 4: FINANCIAL AND CAPITAL PLANS OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET In FY 2018/2019, SunLine plans to have an operating budget of $38,900,991 and a capital project budget of $6,053,623. The operating budget will absorb cost increases in wages and benefits, some new operating and administrative staff positions, as well as other direct costs increases associated with operating service. SunLine utilizes funding from various sources to operate its fixed route and paratransit services. Additional revenue opportunities are pursued in order to reduce subsidy levels. These additional revenue sources include SunLine's bus and shelter advertising, sales of emission credits, outside CNG fuel sales revenue, taxi voucher sales and funding from two jurisdictions for bus shelter maintenance. FUNDING PLANS TO SUPPORT PROPOSED OPERATING AND CAPITAL PROGRAM For FY 2018/2019, funding plans for the proposed operating and capital programs are as follows: Funding sources for the proposed operating budget includes FTA Section 5307 (Urban), 5311 (Rural), 5310 (Elderly and Disabled), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ), and Low Carbon Operating Program (LCTOP) funds apportioned by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), State Local Transportation Funds (LTF), Local Measure A funding, farebox revenue and other revenue for operating assistance. Funding sources for capital projects include funds from FTA's Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ), Section 5307, Section 5339, State Transit Assistance (STA), State of Good Repair Funds, and LTF. 43 siding (N9 NSI1 A6f IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 OPERATING BUDGET The estimated FY 2018/2019 operating and capital budget of $44,954,614 outlined in Table 4, is funded by: FIGURE 4.1 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET Operating Revenues $38,900,991 F- Passenger Fares $2,643,828 LTF $20,621,864 Measure A $6,000,000 State of Good Repair $500,000 L J Estimated 5307 $3,437,436 Estimated 5309 $250,000 Carryover Section 5307 $935,963 J Estimated 5310 $58,000 Estimated 5311 $352,874 Section 5311(f) Operating Assistance] $204,721 Anticipated LCTOP $250,000 Carryover LCTOP $400,467 L J Carryover CMAQ $318,010 Estimated CMAQ $794,208 r LOther Revenue $1,851,574 Capital Revenues $6,053,623 LEstimated STA funds $3,783,879 EState of Good Repair $253,623 Estimated Section 5307 $1,371,949 Section 5339 $644,172 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 19 S►►HIM9 (HANS11 As[IV CY REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS Americans with Disability Act SunLine complies with the guidelines set forth by the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) by providing a 100% accessible revenue service fleet for fixed route transit services and ADA paratransit service vans. Supervisor vans are also equipped with wheelchair lifts. As funding becomes available, the agency continues to provide bus stop improvements to ensure accessibility. Staff also coordinates with developers and contractors regarding construction projects to include bus stop improvements when the opportunity exists. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise SunLine's most recent Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program and goal was revised and submitted to FTA in July 2015. The DBE semiannual reports are kept current, with the most recent DBE report submitted in December 2016. The next DBE report will be submitted in June 2018. Equal Employment Opportunity SunLine complies with federal regulations pertaining to employment and submits its Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)-1 report annually to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) as well as its EEO/Affirmative Action Program every four years or as major changes occur in the workforce or employment conditions to the FTA. The most recent EEO-1 report was submitted to the EEOC and certified in September 2016. The most recent EEO/Affirmative Action Program was revised and submitted to the FTA in FY 2015/2016. Title VI Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects people from discrimination based on race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. SunLine's Title VI Report was updated in FY 2016/2017 for use in the FY 2017/2018 to FY 2019/2020 period. The report is scheduled for update, submission and approval by October 1, 2019. Transportation DevelopmentAct Transportation Development Act (TDA) provides two major sources of funding for public transportation: The Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and the State Transit Assistance fund (STA). RCTC commissioned Pacific Management Consulting to conduct the Triennial Performance Audit as required by Transportation Development Act (TDA) and SunLine's findings are referenced in Table 6. Federal Transit Administration Triennial Audit In accordance with regulations, SunLine Transit Agency completed a Federal Transit Administration Triennial Audit site visit in March 2016. The Triennial Review focused on SunLine's compliance in 17 areas. SunLine had no repeat deficiencies from the 2013 Triennial Review. SunLine met FTA requirements in fourteen (14) areas. Deficiencies were 45 found in three (3) areas; Technical Capacity, Maintenance and Procurement. SHHl►fie SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • 1 0 1 S 2 0 1 9 rxaxsri ASINcr we The Audit recommends: 1) SunLine Transit Agency's overall Technical Capacity and Office Procedures be improved to provide required information in progress reports. 2) Maintenance Department facility preventative maintenance checks be improved to meet an 80 percent minimum target. 3) Procurement Department pre -award and post - delivery processes be improved. Station National Transit Database To keep track of the industry and provide public information and statistics as it continues to grow, FTA's National Transit Database (NTD) records the financial, operating and asset condition of transit systems. Staff are currently finalizing FY 2016/2017 NTD Section sampling. SunLine continues to perform parallel sampling using manual samples and Automatic Passenger Counter (APC) data in order to verify and gain approval to use APC data in future reporting. Alternative Fuel Vehicles SunLine conforms to RCTC's Alternative Fuel Policy with all vehicles in the fleet using CNG, electric or hydrogen fuel. The current active fleet consists of fifty-eight (58) 40-foot CNG buses, five (5) 40-foot Hydrogen Fuel Cell buses, ten (10) 32-foot CNG buses, three (3) 40- foot Electric buses, thirty-seven (37) 22-foot paratransit vans, and forty-five (45) total non - revenue CNG and electric vehicles, including general support cars and trucks as well as facility -specific golf carts and forklifts. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • I Y ? 0 1 S ? 0 1 `> S►►r►1►►►e fly"911 ASINcr FY 2018/2019 SRTP TABLES 47 Smfll►ne (N9 NSI1 1161 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 rd Ire] illej TABLE I FLEET INVENTORY — FIXED ROUTE O pW P N M AW1 4G O� Ci h W LpO� O (V rli. P O let p b 10 � Oi N O QNi Val .�-I m pp n pWp t�opp+ v� �n �n �n ry m m S R 4 4 M h pryi � T M1 ti� N CNCpp � Ppp1 V1 � O N Q IA op P N �i ro ae +c 0 0 0 0 0 0 o P 0 0 0 l N O D O tzi v czi 4 0 Q 0 0 Q 0 P T P 4 4 m P P P P P G N P m m 7 2 yuy[� Vxx ��x( oN� LLLLe LL �LLy e Y Y Q G Q W J J J J O O 0❑ ❑ ❑ LL l4l LL I W fq pp µl W W w 2 z 2 2 O ry N N N N N N N N N v rz IZ8 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 S►►r►1►ne (HRNS17 AGfNCY TABLE I FLEET INVENTORY — DEMAND RESPONSE 2 O ' ?D 6 O e Q (o - .7 W w W � a a a z z z w w w m vi �o a o 0 N N N d C S►►►►L►ne (Nissif 146fN$V SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 5o TABLE 2 SRTP SERVICE SUMMARY - ALL ROUTES (SYSTEM TOTALS) Table 2 • - SunLlne Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary I 201tS119 Sltort RaiHge transit Plan All RbniteS F720251115 1-Y m611), rv,nl7 Ig FY2017128 FY 2013119 •..Mse.f andnrd ..�� etd QUjk1`04 Von Fleet Charack isilm Pw&4*— Flees ?9 FitlaMW Datd tdar I'WatM Ea ,, f:: r. .. S34.31 I, 347 . . rotas p-WQwfbe kelwwe -c7 5•'=•• �'= f+.l:i,SSy Nei Ox.WV EVn (`.u9 r ) - - 3:...: !u.vsa S-. - Operating Chars te7Mtic► IhirlM P-9. T, P 4.5j2,990 .046,I64 4.17l,163 3.I D604 P&M,vor "Ae 3.3,061,673 30.445,739 29—W,333 22.7W,733 27,124,7E5 Total 9khw Vd a, l9e "—. (al 2WOLO W0 ,31b= 514,mo 220,764.a 299,255 C Toll kbw vdl de A� Mkt (b) 41362.4MA 4,49"Ma 4,5D 1,3a3.0 3,506,749.7 4,426,269.: Tad/Chats VMde 14Y. 4-sN.0N.7 5,11I465.) S,S20,834A 4,I47,121.1 S,OBO,Hm9,i Per(W414nce Ch44aCW(*tKS Opmwv Cw"PA—W houa 1106.vi ilr/+-9B 5330,99 9106-17 S1i9.9= ibebx Aeepery A40e 2245% :0•+D% 17,45y, 17.17ti I7y'3`. m P-wW SS-41 56-06 'i61H 56-4� f0.:' Stbsdy Per Peerage• Mir W74 SO-4116 50-9a E4Xa $Lt. aa7dvP•y Re.a,< Kr (4) fP261 S65.35 W-61 $W112 W7n SrEedy Pe• PMtve M. (D) 9$.61 SSaQ W40 i5.7A S7-4. P4rnge. Pa Aeeawe tk— (al I" N.0 13.3 13.•i I3.f Paaapa Ga P.— M M (6) Im 1 0.96 0.93 (a) bmr rwifv W MDOei, ib)r.-"-•.-:•;, v. SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 s/m/►ne (HANS17 ASf NCY TABLE 2 SRTP SERVICE SUMMARY - NON -EXCLUDED ROUTES Table 2 -- SunLine Transit Agency -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018119 Short Range Transit Plait Non -Excluded Routes FY 2MI16 PY 2016II7 FY 2017f18 FY 2017)10 FY 2010119 Audited Budded Tian 3rd Qtr Actual Plan Fleet Ch]rarterlstics Peak-h— Fkel 90 95 Financial Data TdW oMmV En— $30106d,006 529,998,799 134,230,707 $24,311,347 6,37,855,%7 TPW Pa—Vo Fare Rea M ►6,927,037 S61350.3n 55,977,401 $4,174,555 56,637,193 Wet Dparaarg Et1wP.rd ISUb d,,? V3,154,966 I S23,639,776 t28,253,226 P20,136,791 931,219,779 Operating Chara,ttesistlts tir0r,ktd Pnserg& Tom 4,36AO 4,056,924 4,152,461 3,106,66: 3,837,300 pm.WK r ndrs 32r119,74$ A631,002 29,07ZA30 Z476v.733 26,849.590 TOW AMW Vd*k Fk m Maas (a) 167403.1 281,969.E 311,848.0 226,769,-, 254,256.0 Tow.4tuA YeWck R— Mdes (b) 4,116,32E-3 4A24,a92-4 4,436,305.0 3,506,749-' 4,321,403A Tohl uu al ❑ h k W. --- - _ -- 5A33,433.v a,147,12f d 4,995,610.v Performance Characteristics OW" Caci W Rpprae HW OX45 $19639 $109,77 St06-: $126.65 Fartbo R.&"V RAW 23.03% 21.70% 17,46% I7.17°. 17.5$% su_: F P. P-9er i5sa ssm s6.60 76-s.: $8,39 `rLb y P. Pmoerg- Mae W72 So.Al $0.97 $0.8- tl•36 ;ubPdr w Ataer x fiau {a} $81.93 0344 $90.60 588-02 91v6A9 Suh-ly p- Aeeerr,e M& (11) JSU SS317 S&37 $S.7= PM Pasasper pd Re.erwr Mour (al 295 14.4 13.3 13-t 13.0 Pasacgb pe Revenue ?Ue (b) 107 101 1 0.94 1 029 1 om (a) Tr Horan For Rai W.1m. tb) Car Kim For Rd Modes. 51 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 52 TABLE 2 SRTP SERVICE SUMMARY - EXCLUDED ROUTES Table Z - • SunLlne Trar7sit Agegry -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018/ 19 Slfort. Range Transit Plan Excluded Rapes FY 16111 I6 FY 20161 t7 FY Z017!18 FY 2017; 18 TY 20la 119 Audited Audded P1ai. 1M Q1r An—, pan Fleet Chwmtm7 ucs Peak•lx 0 nw FlnancW Data TOWS UWIWV Evy w. it,�StxAc36 52.o"4,1W Sba4,l I .. Tofy P&Zoye Fare a[rense i,6)I] S V7,?94 $I l t,417 1 , Fkt operabv EwCY (5AMdm) 51,M3,:27 5:,53I,1W M7,701 Operating Charactarletics yFVr eE Prmgd Tr" i36,367 2"Ons 2$.7[0 pAw'- er Mk9 "TAW 31817,737 t74jQ3 Toys Amw VeWe Rene x h� (a) 11110L9 25,3a6.S ;4424.0 Tory Amw V~e N� Mies (bl 246,122.3 471,576.6 65.077.0 Tory Aftuy VMak raft -,66,2842 s2k]W VAIA Performance Characterlsncs Opegianp C+vst pe. pr..r� Now S1i7�2 111 i. s - • ' -: irbo'f Fwv Raba 3119% 12d19% 17.35,% S,L k pe 77pae ve 99.E n.76 $20.93 S,tn m Pa-arge We $1,43 91,40 $3.06 .. A4r by Pe tf� m> W 051.73 "91A6 W1.41 9*mjy pn i� tie W sSA2 om Sa•27 Pala w pe Re+e^.e Ha (1) t0.3 ml ]*A 03=0%W pe R ewe Mk (b) 04S A O.SS 1 O.39 (a) ham rlbyr: fog Ad KDJec (6) Car mda 1. Red W- -- SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN - F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 S►►r►llne rNissif ASf NCY TABLE 2 SRTP SERVICE SUMMARY- PARATRANSIT Table 2 -- Sun Line -DAM -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan All Routes FY 21115119 FY 2016117 FY 2617118 FY 2017%la FY 2019119 WdRed AWned Pon 3rd wActual Plan Fleet CharacterMcs Pnak-M— FiL— 31 31 Fi FFanaal Data TOW Opaawg Epa+seF i9,563,10s t5.833,092 9,023,437 54,243,695 56,399.05 TOW Pww mJ Fare Re'.a+ue f765,55D 5604r%1 57.03 i.1t6 2436,403 S3,095,746 Het Oplrabg FV—(Su-dkq) S4,EWA4 4 S5, L46,131 S4,992,i41 S3,R07,492 ss,303AM Operating Cho racterlstks ilnirlled Paplpgp Pv; 164,024 164,502 174,625 117,714 159,232 Paa9Rrp-, Mde 1,956,665 1,932,532 d.064,663 4335,163 116W,720 To¢I,4ttW VOK* RevCWe Mows to] 6916%7 6L"Lli so,669-0 50AWD 67,249.0 TOW Ad1A VOWle RevMue Mae (6) 1.067,6t9.0 1031,411" 1,45%371.0 743,546.1 99t,670.0 TOW AtA Vereek Maly 1, 17$750.0 1,218,3?3.1 I.236,631.0 80i,521 .0 I,189,306A Performance C1Fdracter16t9c5 OFt*atfa9 Cox P. R— M-16 FveEm ReSovGv Ratq 12.L6A Il-N A 17. i2% ab.dy per P-0- S29a1 631.24 M52 subndr P& Palmmo We SLOB 92.6S SL42 17-75 S=.64 Subsdy m Rereraa Fwv (a) 3w.70 $74.67 $72,49 p&06 M.S7 Su6a7v Per Re.erge "be (t,l S4-47 14.99 54-75 $S-12 S5.35 Pdyierper pa R� npr (a) m 2.4 2.5 2.4 1-4 Pas%gc Pb Revenue We mi 0.15 0.16 0.17 O.IS 9.16 (a) rraea Hows 1w Rai MoJm t67 Cer Naafi for Ra/ Mpde1, 53 S►►►►L►ne (179NS11 14614$V SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 54 TABLE 2 SERVICE SUMMARY - SUNBUS TaWe 2 -- SunLine-BUS -- SRTP Service Summary FY 2018/ 19 5f1art R311410 i tsn.il P4nn All RtHlten "1dt5116 FY 014111 FY Jet ill 14 FY M171 la rY XW 19 Mrlad IIII11a1M plat lyd W aural Plan iiviChralaiaks OF— _ N*4luFk.t Lx 66 fleas" vou Tdwuo. m (7m� sxkoA.Zf WP".255 Me%.579 $.0) &7.451 $12 sul-W7 Teel Paca.V. Fie 19.nr4n fF 424.o." fd,RTl.4j2 0,057,jj: 13,:3$!52 15,726.M 1t1t �tr1P�EtiVr+4si [i�AiA01dy S:7hxj.,.: }'[Lim fle,};9 y9 3.E4'74,e97 CY.rxlalittie:� - Vt�MO P9aprpr TR>s t.AA9ee a :5;,ae;. 9.�J.ifa Y.97p,i 1: R� 19,5% 3>; aau.7ac .2A% M n.Uo mo ak4w472 2A.256.069 TOW AM.A VLft& Fsv...r.o.r4 lai PfLd:93 Vex.3 t75,51t6 Z37m6➢ Tor a[A.a ve d} w." wn I-W 7.Zr 3.a67.sry- - S.r51.4:1.a 7361,fid4 14x-" D Teglus�l vr.1e atrs 36"-:. -v4)R wrfpin4ow cha -tsrktit, sll' F,arho ¢scam F.no 24469. 72-.T]A ir3r'X 1163� Vkbs s- o a. pmwrq;.p is34 ax u_m whm as Pam .aa f047 taro So4p ldeu plat 5.9b9dr cw awb.. ttas Sal town =-.9 f9696 W -M 511,&41 5 INor co I fi io] SSL" l6Ae W90 pmwkop ow ft ~ lnis (a) mj :7.4 M-) 17L :6a P4.P.,,,, ao a— rW roi :-u 14 1:6 :ls Z-w Sal Trap last 4 wat ", - m14 M"%t Rp pA&& SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 S►►r►1►ne r Ni NSI7 ASIANY TABLE 2A SRTP SUMMARY OF ROUTES TO BE EXCLUDED IN FY 2018/2019 Line 20 Directly Fixed Route Express I I Operated Line 21 Fixed Route Directly Operated Line 111 Express Fixed Route Directly Operated Desert Hot Springs — Palm January2016 December Desert Palm Desert I January2018 IDecember Palm Springs — Coachella January 2019 December 55 siding (Nis NIf A6[IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 TABLE 3 SRTP ROUTE STATISTICS — ALL ROUTES t y 4 q q � o o q• � � q � .-. o 0 0 � � s q iIa.1.1.1xAA A.4.1aAA.1 x AI ��= w w w a a v a v w a v w a Q 4 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH/►ne (1vRNS17 AGf NCY TABLE 3A INDIVIDUAL ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS Shopping, Schools, DMV, Employment Center, Desert Hot Springs and 14 Trunk 15, 20, 24, 30 & 111 Library, Senior Center Palm Springs Shopping Centers, Senior Center, Library, Desert Hot Springs and 15 Local 14 Community Center, City Hall, Medical, and Schools Desert Edge Shopping, Senior Center, Library, Community Center, Desert Hot Springs, 14, 15, 32, 54, 111, Link 20 Local Rancho Mirage, Palm Schools 220 & Amtrak Desert Shopping, Medical, Library, City Hall, School, College, Desert Hot Springs, Palm 21 Local 14, 15, 32, 54, & 111 and Mall Desert 24 Local Shopping, Medical, Library, Social Services, Theaters Palm Springs 14, 30, 32, 111 & MBTA Shopping, Schools, Medical, Library, Senior Center, Palm Springs and 30 Trunk Airport, Court House, Social Security, Theaters, and 14, 24, 32, 111 & MBTA Cathedral City Public Social Services Palm Springs, Cathedral Shopping, School, College, Medical, Theaters, Mall 20, 24, 30, 54, 111, Link 32 Local City, Rancho Mirage, Palm and Hospital 220 & Amtrak Desert, Thousand Palms Palm Desert, Indian Wells, Shopping, School, Tennis Gardens, Work Force 20, 32, 111, Link 220 & 54 Local La Quinta, Indio, Bermuda Development, and College Amtrak Dunes La Quinta, Palm Desert, 70 Local Shopping, Schools, Theaters and Medical Indian Wells, Bermuda 111 & Amtrak Dunes Shopping, School, Workforce Development, Social 80 Local Indio 54, 81, 90, 91 & 111 Services, Senior Center, DMV, Hospital Shopping, Schools, Medical, Community Center, 54, 80, 90, 91, 111 & 81 Local College, DMV, Hospital, Work Force Development, Indio Greyhound Social Services and Employment Center Shopping, Library, City Hall, Senior Center, 90 Local Indio and Coachella 54, 80, 81, 91 & 111 Community Center, Social Services and Medical Shopping, College, Schools, Community Center, and Indio, Coachella, Thermal, 91 Local 54, 80, 81, 90 & 111 Medical Mecca, Oasis Shopping, College, Community Center, Medical and Indio, Coachella, Mecca 95 Local 90, 91 & 111 Schools and North Shore Palm Springs, Cathedral Hospital, Medical, Shopping, College, Mall and City, Rancho Mirage, Palm 111 Trunk 70 80 81 90 & , 1,, 70, 80, 81, 90 & 91, 111, Schools Desert, Indian Wells, La Amtrak &MBTA Quinta, Indio Palm Desert, Rancho 20, 32, 54, 111, Mirage, Cabazon Casino,Metrolink, 220 Market -Based Mall, College, Shopping and University Pass Transit, Beaumont, Moreno RTA&Greyhound Valley, Riverside 57 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 M TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF FUNDS FOR FY 2018/2019 w r o o r O - III lit I I o o S 8 y� N ia - o is UN L_L^y t � 8 8 o 0 ` 8 8 $ 9 55�� S S 9 m o+ O 39 b K K u m � tl . E O O E O � m $ m w o � g Uvi .QNa i;g a55 E $ w A t a � � g o o r o o S S o m 0 0 0 aS $ g88Y885353 88888888sd8�� `r 8:�3 sgs��ss�s� U V N O S m E 3 E F w 2 E. c °E' w `o w E K F L w K K K iE m a� a O rn rn $2 U y° rn E m m m d B m m 3 3 m 9a-+ m .y $ m .W LL 1 r a u a 2 a u a 2 a u a a a H a a d N o 0 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 S►►r►1►ne (HA NS11 AGfNCY TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [SL-19-011 ' ' ' • - SL-19-01 • • • Replacement Fixed Route Buses (3) Purchase of three (3) fixed route buses to replace • • • • existing CNG bus fleets that will have reached their useful life as outlined by FTA guidelines. The purchase of three (3) fixed route buses will ensure • • • • SunLine replaces older fleet vehicles to maintain services reliability and reduce maintenance costs. July 2018 June 2021 STA 2019 $420,000 Section 5307 2019 $1,035,828 Section 5339 2019 $644,172 .. $2,100,000 59 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 " t TABLE 4A  CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [SL-19-021 ' ' ' " - " SL-19-02 ' " " Transit Enhancements The enhancements of bus stop systems to improve access for all customers through modernization of bus shelters, benches, kiosks, signage, and lighting to enhance security and safety. The enhancement of transit facilities promotes safety " " " " and security for people throughout the Coachella Valley. Ftart Date CompletionDate July 2018 June 2021 " " - " STA 2019 $143,879 5307 2019 $56,121 .. $200,000 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN " F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 19 SJUHI�% 9 (HANS17 AGfANY TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [SL-19-03] ' ' ' • - • SL-19-03 • • • Information Technology (IT) Projects The project supports the purchase of the Agency's need • • • • for software, network infrastructure, computing resources, and business analytics. The use of IT equipment is critical to the daily function • • • • and efficiency in providing safe, reliable and efficient transit services. Ftart Date CompletionDate July 2018 June 2021 STA 2019 $70,000 Section 5307 2019 $280,000 • $350,000 61 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 62 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH/►ne 1HANS11 AGINCY TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [SL-19-051 ' ' ' • - SL-19-05 ' • • Radio System Replacement The project purchases Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) radio system to replace current system. The new ' • • • ' • system will have the ability to monitor VoIP calls between the dispatch center, mobile workforce and revenue vehicles. SunLine's current radio system has met its useful life and is no longer a supported system, making repair parts difficult to purchase. Replacing this system with newer technology will enhance our communication. Start Date Completion Date July 2018 June 2021 STA 2019 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 63 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 " A TABLE 4A  CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [SL-19-061 ' ' ' " - SL-19-06 ' " " Replacement of Paratransit Vans (10) Purchase of 10 vans to replace existing SunDial ' " " " ' " paratransit vans that will have reached their useful life as outlined by FTA guidelines. The purchase of 10 paratransit vans will ensure SunLine ' " " " replaces older fleet vehicles to maintain service reliability and reduce maintenance costs. Fadjlmompletion Date -M July 2018 June 2021 STA 2019 $1, 350, 000 " $1,350,000 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN " F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUHI�% 9 (xis911 AGfNCY TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [SL-19-071 SL-19-07 • • • Roof Repair Division 1 and 2 The project will allow SunLine to repair and improve • • • • roofing of existing buildings at Thousand Palms and Indio divisions. The project will allow for continued safety and security of staff and the general public. July 2018 June 2021 Fiscal Year Amount • . • • State of Good Repair 2019 $125,000 .. $125,000 65 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 TABLE 4A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [SL-19-081 ' ' ' • - • SL-19-08 ' • • Maintenance Tools and Equipment The project purchases major replacement tools, ' • • • ' • equipment and parts used in routine vehicle maintenance. Equipment must be replaced to ensure proper maintenance of all SunLine vehicles. July 2018 June 2021 Fiscal Year A State of Good 2019 $50,000 • . • • Repair • $50,000 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH ► 9 (xis911 AGfNCY TABLE 4A - CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [SL-19-091 ' ' ' • - • SL-19-09 • • • Install Electric Charger for Buses — Division 2 Project will install electric charging stations at SunLine's Indio division. By installing charging stations at Division 2, the Agency �' • • will increase efficiency by cutting down deadhead time and increase productivity of daily bus operations. FStart Date Completion Date July 2018 June 2021 Fiscal Year Amount State of Good 2019 $78,623 • . • • Repair • $78,623 67 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 " i SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN " F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH/�%ne 1HANS11 AGINCY TABLE 5.1 SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED FOR FY 2019/2020 o� p � - U a U a o 0 p U o g � U o g o rn Cn i:.f{i � Cn o o 0 0 N V� cc" R pp O o0 N = U Q N VJ VC"> O O CD Efp3 F- �[O R EA EA cVpD O El —CPO (C,�p L7 orn LL csT tR eA 93 O_ O E- cS O ap � O Z � <s} o O 0 •.• O d O F-- c 7 Ua - G U Yi C3 o C - O � - ¢U U O � J� U d g O U g o g g 0 o g o- N o 0 o O VJ O N - Vl 6� C� S o O O ao cif = U 0 o6OO� p p p po N Z4 � O L7 O O O O O _ O o o O O c_OO_ H a S E N N N N U U � v Ci N 4i O p E @ ii a d g d Z• • S►►►►L►ne (NisNIf A8[IV ry SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 70 TABLE 5.1A CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION FOR FY 2019/2020 TABLE 5.1A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [SL-20-011 ' ' ' • - • SL-20-01 • 1.0 •• Replacement Fixed Route Buses (6) Purchase of six (6) fixed route buses to replace existing 1.0 •• • CNG bus fleets that will reach their useful life as outlined by FTA guidelines. The purchase of six (6) fixed route buses will ensure • • • • SunLine replaces older fleet vehicles to maintain service reliability and reduce maintenance costs. July 2019 June 2022 STA 2020 $2,532,000 Section 5307 2020 $1,000,000 Section 5339 2020 $500,000 • $4,032,000 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 19 SJUHI► 9 (HANS17 AGfANY 1AISLL+ ,.IA-UAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [NL-ZU-ULJ ' ' ' • - • SL-20-02 ' • • Information Technology (IT) Projects The project supports the purchase of the Agency's need ' • • • ' • for software, network infrastructure, computing resources, and business analytics. The use of IT equipment is critical to the daily function ' • • • and efficiency in providing safe, reliable and efficient transit services. USt—art Date7=kbCompletion Date M July 2019 June 2022 STA 2020 $350,000 $350,000 • 71 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 72 TABLE 5.1A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [SL-20-03] ' ' ' • - • SL-20-03 ' • • Replacement of Paratransit Vans (4) Purchase of four (4) vans to replace existing SunDial ' • • • ' • paratransit vans that will have reached their useful life as outlined by FTA guidelines. The purchase of four (4) paratransit vans will ensure ' • • • SunLine replaces older fleet vehicles to maintain service reliability and reduce maintenance costs. F�t—a r D.t Mpr-, CompletionDate July 2019 June 2022 STA 2020 $540,000 $540,000 • SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUHI► 9 (xis911 AGfNCY TABLE 5.1A — CAPITAL PROJECT ' • • JUSTIFICATION [SL-20-04] SL-20-04 Security Cameras for Division II & Coachella Hub This project will purchase and install transit security cameras at the Indio division and Coachella Hub. "• • This project is required to provide safe and secure transit facilities for staff, passengers, and vehicles. ggmag& A MrSVIT07% July 2019 June 2022 0�iscal Year ., STA 2020 $150,000 .. $150,000 73 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 TABLE 5.2 SUMMARY OF FUNDS REQUESTED FOR FY 2020/2021 74 N E U W N J lj Q o a h-' H x 0 0 N d � O� M L[S CT M D M O Ch O O �CpD O pp Cf> CC�'J U U d O 0 o o 0 g g U J n F9 M M L(J O .0 CON p O N p O N O ./D C/J EfJ Gf3 L1U0'J � N 6M9 O M cli .0 co O O o s U m E U - .0 o a rn rn rn rn Q Cn 0 p Ct0'Y � O CND O J N O N O N O O CNCpD O � app0 CC'J O O CC�'J CO O 0 H � Es3 Ef3 O O O C O H 69 �Nlf� -NCR � M c e"o O 0 N O O ¢F Wo- U A L U o LL 0 0 CU � 60i} M O CT M CU 0 i� O H U 0 0 g u'a Ef} O �..My O pO_ O pO O pO .0 V)N M l[Y p O p O .0 N EiJ CtM') O d VO1J � YS UM9 O M fOn- th O .0 C/J O O O U _ ca o o o y e» vs :- ci E U ci o a m � rn v_ rn c j 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 �_ 4? 0 p0 N 0 0 cND N Cfi 0 0 CND N cfT L.L J COS V O N Ef} N O o PfJ C1�'J U 0 H e» O O O O O O N O H N O � d O O O 8 E U <V J N J N J N J a � m d Q U _ .`a R U oa m o a 2 o 05 R rn m o L � o ui _ Q O R aEi N � d aEi a� H a lof - if a SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 S►►r►1►ne (HRNS17 AGfNCY TABLE 5.2A CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION FOR FY 2020/2021 TABLE 5.2A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [SL-21-011 ' ' ' • - • SL-21-01 • 1.0 •• Replacement Fixed Route Buses (3) Purchase of three (3) fixed route buses to replace 1.0 •• • existing CNG bus fleets that will reach their useful life as outlined by FTA guidelines. The purchase of three (3) fixed route buses will ensure • • • • SunLine replaces older fleet vehicles to maintain service reliability and reduce maintenance costs. July 2020 June 2023 STA 2021 $320,000 Section 5307 2021 $1,000,000 Section 5339 2021 $500,000 • $1,820,000 75 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 76 IAISLL+ ,.LA—UAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION [NL—ZI—ULJ ' ' ' • - • SL-21-02 ' • • Information Technology (IT) Projects The project supports the purchase of the Agency's need ' • • • ' • for software, network infrastructure, computing resources, and business analytics. The use of IT equipment is critical to the daily function ' • • • and efficiency in providing safe, reliable and efficient transit services. USt—art Date�WkbCompletionDate July 2020 June 2023 STA 2021 $350,000 $350,000 • SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUHI► 9 (xis911 AGfNCY TABLE 5.2A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION f SL-21-031 SL-21-03 • • • Replacement of Paratransit Vans (13) Purchase of thirteen (13) vans to replace existing • • • • SunDial paratransit vans that will have reached their useful life as outlined by FTA guidelines. The purchase of thirteen (13) paratransit vans will • • • • ensure SunLine replaces older fleet vehicles to maintain service reliability and reduce maintenance costs. July 2020 June 2023 STA 2021 $1, 755, 000 .. $1,755,000 77 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 W] • TABLE 5.2A — CAPITAL PROJECT JUSTIFICATION f SL-21-O41 ' ' ' • - • SL-21-04 ' • • Upgrade Division I Fence - Secure Base • . • • This project is to secure the base of the perimeter fencing at Sunl-ine's Thousand Palms facility. This project is needed to ensure the safety and security of SunLine employees and passengers. July 2020 June 2023 STA 2021 $200,000 $200,000 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUHI► 9 (xis911 AGfNCY TABLE 6 PROGRESS TO IMPLEMENT TRIENNIAL PERFORMANCE AUDIT SunLine completed a Transportation Development ACT (TDA) State Triennial Performance Audit in September 2016 for FY 2012/2013 through 2014/2015. The audit was performed by Michael Baker International. Table 6 "Progress to Implement the Triennial Performance Audit" summarizes the Performance Audit recommendations and actions taken by SunLine in response. Table 6 — Progress to Implement Triennial Performance Audit Performance Audit n and -el AN 1) Prepare and submit separate State This recommnedation has been addressed. The FY 2015/16 report has been submitted Controller Tranist Operators Financial and this process has been added to the procedures. Transaction Report fo general public transit specialized service. (High Priority) 2) Continue to pursue a fare revenue SunLine is collaborating with the College of the Desert, University of Califonia sharing agreement with College of the Riverside, and California State University San Bernardino Palm Desert Campus on a U- Desert. Pass. (High Priority) 3) Engage in longterm planning. SunLine will be pursuing funds to implement a long range transit plan with a strategic (Medium Priority) marketing plan in FY 2017/18. 79 siding (N9 NSIf 1461 IV Illy SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 " ' " TABLE 7 SERVICE PROVIDER PERFORMANCE TARGETS Table 7 -- Service Provider Performance Targets Report FV 29L71143 Short Range Tram11 Plan Renew Suntloe Iri H91t AWKY Data Elements rV 2017116 plan FY 2017118 taryCi FV 20171I8 Year to Date Through Ird quarter Year t9 pate Perlormance 5cnretard urbtk d 0 ...V-- Talc 4,176,181 Pamerge MYes 29,��7,33# t-W anyrt Vlhldr rely Mmxq AjAr ]d 15tal 74wa V*f.* P11VIA MA= 45p AN-9 Tptd 00mo V6FN11F Min 54IA M-0 Total owat-V Egenm 04AW.025 Tow PmwKw rip. pewm 1. 16xfts% Net 0---D��g &paves {38,791,127 PBriOrM1Yarr[e Indication Fla I. Fa e6eu Recv.��y R.he 17.15M ���� 17-a9-ti 17.1Fakm Mlrt Tr9ar 4=x4S1 t. Op. "tare of keeae Hm S118.99 1t06.94 5106.27 Hleta T.71 2, s�b P v ,pa 36.69 s- 54,7e and c- P6 S6. a Falk m r T4-prr 3. ktody Pe, Fowv w Mlk 4Q.90 ?- aq,66 W e- 6p,92 so= M-ts To" 1. %body P* him $91.61 T- SOM &A s" tr22.29 Sum MoatsurPrt 5. ` y Per Mk $&10 s-14.64 a,d r- y6.28 $5.71 Heeb Taro 6. P.mNws Pa RMn.6 H61y 13-N >- 5I.16 -16 <- 18.15 t3.6a H." *.gm 7. Pit Pa Rem,a. FG6 Q.93 ��- a$I ud  1-tz 049 Mph T&Qet raeare twtwr.els.aalgRd 7arR��sulvr w,Isavee 6deeeH PwdhCtl4Hp P!I)alYRallr! S4tl11Mfq' Sl W I[l Prer,dlr C 6I11111-tv 7771 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN " F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH/�%ne (xis911 AGfNCY TABLE 8 FY 2018/2019 SRTP PERFORMANCE REPORT FY 2018/19 - Table 8 -- SRTP Performance Report Servic a Prvvirler: Swil Me Prart sir Ageiie y All Rowe% Performance Indlcatars FY 2016117 End of Year Actual FY 2017/ 10 Ird Quarter Year•t0.Oate FY 2018119 Plan FY 2a18J19 Target m Plan Perforance Scorecard (a) Passcye.: 4,316,269 3.106.668 3.6 A2 u rdy Pao 'gn mkm 301411,739 22,M733 27.124.769 None R� Huxc 307.3161 23a.7w. 299,1S5.0 None TOW+I 333.332.9 249.64&9 325,119.0 Nate R� Milos 4,4W,671.0 300(4749.7 L426,M&O None Total Mies S,I11,465.3 4,t41,12m 3ABo,a9&o None DP&&" Cam% 532,677,347 124,311,347 S3a,900.99r^ Nan[ Passegn Revenue $k706973 14,174,555 16,822,436 None opff"o subuh 526,170,974 136,791 532.076.556 None coera0fp Cod%Pe e� Hq.. $106.9e $106.27 $129.99 None t]ca"q CoSI Pb Reve M2e 17.31 6&93 $&79 None oECi"q Cob Pb pa09'vft 57.62 i7.&7 S10A3 None Fwe6ox Recovery Rat. b.40% 17.17% 17.53% a. 11.5% rleet, TA"2et sub" Pa Pa..b+ $6.06 16,4(•' M27 a. 17A5 ands. $5.51 Fab m Meet Ta,p-• S'b.ov P. Pazger Misr $0.86 Om $1.18 a. $1.01 and[. $0.75 Fa k to Meet Tar ge S.bsey Pa R._ Har $0&16 $B&02 $107.19 ]. $10123 and . 574A3 Fa k to Meet Tar yr SLbd6y Per Rey ttie SS.82 15.7+ F7.25 1. 46.6o and c - SAAB gala to Meet Tarflet P+amw+g— Ptr Fn'enle Roar 14.00 13.6c. 13M >- M64 and [. At-% Pars P& FL— MA. om 0.85• OAB ]. 3A2 acid C.0.76 A) The Pan Pdriatmance Sml ecatd 03kom G the resaAe of axrom rp the FY ZOOM Plan to Ole FY 2C-19129 Awry Toga, mi siding rN9 NSI1 148 rN 6't SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 Me TABLE 9 HIGHLIGHTS OF FY 2018/2019 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN TABLE 9 — HIGHLIGHTS OF FY 2018/2019 SRTP • SunLine continues planned improvements to its operations facility which is undergoing replacement. • Purchase three (3) replacement CNG fixed route buses and replacement non - revenue support vehicles (2 supervisor and 2 safety). • Continue to work with the jurisdictions to improve bus stops with in the service area using Prop 113 Safety and Security funds. • Purchase and implement use of software system network infrastructure upgrade, enterprise software implementation to improve efficiency of agency operations. • Increase revenue through the advertising program. • Conduct a planning study to determine the transit needs of the Coachella Valley. Operating $ Financial FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Data Estimated Planned Fixed Route Ridership •.. �� •.: •. •: SunDial Ridership . . . • System Wide Ridership Operating Cost Per Revenue Hour SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUHI► 9 (xis911 AGfNCY TABLE 9B FAREBOX CALCULATION Table•: with Commission -••Calculation Farebox(consistent P. Y18/19 includedRevenue Sources in Farebox Actual Amount Audit FY17/18 Ir 1 Passenger Fares $ 3,055,021.54 $ 2,930,117.05 $ 2,643,828.00 2 Interest $ 3,963.54 $ 1,491.25 $ 1,100.00 3 General Fund Supplement $ - $ - $ - 4 Measure A $ - $ - $ - 5 Advertising Revenue $ 184,210.41 $ 165,000.00 $ 76,000.00 6 Gain on Sale of Fixed Assets $ - $ - $ - 7 CNG Revenue / Emission Credit $ 1,663,571.23 $ 1,884,149.42 $ 1,450,000.00 8 Lease / Other Revenue $ - $ - $ - 9 Federal Excise Tax Refund $ - $ - $ - 10 Investment Income $ - $ - $ - 11 CalPers CERBT $ - $ - $ - 12 Fare Revenues from Exempt Routes $ - $ - $ - 13 Other Revenues $ 1, 884, 907.48 $ 1, 910, 784.75 $ 1, 024, 525.00 Total Revenue for Farebox Calculation 1113) $ 6,791,674.20 $ 6,891,542.47 $ 5,195,453.00 Total Operating Expenses for Farebox Calculation $ 32,962,648.27 $ 34,880,026.00 $ 38,900,991.00 Farebox Recovery Ratio 20.60% 19.76% 13.36% siding (Nis NIf A8[IV rY SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 FIGURE A-1 SUNBUS SYSTEM MAP, JANUARY 2018 DESERT MISSION LAKES HOT 4th ON SPRINGSON PIERSND HA NDA y O NGLtSH TWO BUNCH PALMS r 44PS Oo 14 z A � DILLON a LINE 1 i AURORA ROSAPARKS 5 SAN RAFAEL m Z DESERT LINE m _ EDGE I K VISTACHINO IL STEVENS z Ty Y E D O Z A y ➢ r m i K 3 M r P AVE 36 LINE iO z c 5 20 = TAHQUITZ A G to BARIS70 RAMON Or g n LINE n y THOUSAND y 32 LINE p w m v PALMS 1'f . o ➢ DINAH SHORE 1� N 2 LINE PALM N<+0SPRINGS 90 Z 30 GERALp FORA 9 x � m y m GE m � B ST as 4 rsfffili g IRAN511 AGENCY ANNIVERSARY 1977 - 2017 System Map Map del sistema CUSTOMER SERVICE SERVICIO AL CLIENTE 760.343.3451 sunline.org TTY/TDD Service Available N CATHEDRAL oo FRANKSINATRA 'a'FR A S CITY y o z = I rgrF COUNTRY CLUB o'V AvEJ RANCHO HARRI AVINE 4D2•IOlA��MIRAGE �0la�z HOVLEY DUNES z a LIN 1' PALM 8 0 "� o DESERT m INDIAN Z n z m WELLS AVE 47 LINE ' yQ n LINE 1 1 CARREON 0 70 J AVE L '9 COACHELLA m SO y' LA A let z QUINTA AVE 50 ath o ➢ LINE sth A " TAMPrco z 90 ma 5INALOA AVE 52 COMMUTER LINK 220 - Palm Desert to Riverside A E5 RIVERSIDE METROLINK i MAORI❑ AVE 70 s AVE ' STATION 3 • UCRLOT 30 i•�•_• m INE AIRPORT BLV 6p ' �' ➢ 9'' •t( AVE 57 MORENO FIR La• A m AVE 58 BEAU VALLEY NA CABAZON 1i B�ei R Co Wal Mart MALL casino 0 4 n � >; = THERMAL MEccN Moronga THOUSAND AVE72 8 AVE 62RERMAL PALMS WINDLASS y MECCA ~ zORTH 5 See schedule for details of stop locations OASIS "°�rw Ave ss9 = PALM SHORE d'4+es • DESERT xin LINE ZONE1 �ZONE2� n' QC 95 Cabazon to Riverside Palm Desert to Thousand Palm s AVE 70 NORTH SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 19 f" N911 ASINCr ROUTE PROFILES LINE 14—DESERT HOT SPRINGS— PALM SPRINGS Line 14 is one of SunLine's most successful routes. This trunk route links the cities of Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs, connecting to Lines 15, 20, 24, 30, and 111 and linking riders with local shopping centers, schools, the Palm Springs Convention Center, Department of Motor Vehicles, the Employment Development Department, libraries, senior center, theaters, and other services within the communities of Desert Hot Springs and Palm Springs. The Line 14 operates with 20-minute frequency during weekday peak periods and 30-minute frequency during weekday evenings. The last Line 14 trip serves Hacienda Avenue in Desert Hot Springs to meet passenger demand in this area. Additionally, one morning and one afternoon trip are provided to accommodate the volume of school students. DESERT MISSION LAKES 9PALMS HOT SPRINGS % ERSON15HACIENDA 20 V DILLON N A VISTA CHINO 32 J DMV O TIME POINT Q TRANSFER p CITYHALL TAHQUITZ LIBRARY O SENIOR CENTER BARIIT13Z4 30 �[ SCHOOL ni AMON 8vl ■ ■ ■ SELECTEDTRIP DNLY PALM SPRINGS Hours of Operation: 4:53 AM 11:20 PM Weekdays Annual Route Cost $1,827,026 5:48 AM 10:41 PM Weekends Annual Farebox Route Revenue $634,733 20/30 MIN Weekdays (Peak/Off-Peak) Cost per Rider $2.90 Subsidy per Rider $5.46 40 MIN Weekends Average Speed: Peak Vehicles 17.7 mph 7 Average Daily Passengers Weekday 2,006 •Ism 87.1% Average Daily Passengers Weekends Annual Passengers 1,085 629,697 . 29.42 Passengers per Hour Passengers per Mile 22.2 1.5 430,5951 Annual Wheelchair Boardings Annual Bicycle Boardings 6,275 20,866 Annual Revenue Hours 28,365 Population within .5 mi of stop Jobs within .5 mi of stop 31,971 14,162 siding (Nissir 14611v$V SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 1 9 M • LINE 15-DESERT HOT SPRINGS -DESERT EDGE Line 15 serves the community of Desert Hot Springs and Desert Edge, a Riverside County unincorporated community located southeast of Desert Hot Springs. Line 15 connects to Lines 14 and 20, and links riders with local shopping centers, a neighborhood community center, Boys and Girls Club of Desert Hot Springs, schools, and other services within the City of Desert Hot Springs. Service is under study for Mission Lakes Boulevard and Two Bunch Palms Trail for this route, as well as service at Little Morongo Road west of West Drive and west of Dillon Road, Long Canyon Road and Desert Edge. O 4T" ST N O TIME POINT ■ DESERTHOTSPRINGS Q TRANSFER J ■p PIERSON CITY HALL Oft: 14 \h1` © SENIOR CENTER 20 (� © LIBRARY HACIENDA =� V SCHOOL da QO O TWO O RU NCH PALMS A14 20 z DESERT o EDGE Y DILLON O O J¢ AURORA Hoursof Operation: 4:54 AM 8:49 PM 7:00 AM 7:44 PM Service S• . Weekdays Weekends Annual Route Cost $726,857 Annual Farebox Route Revenue $126,919 Frequency:Cost per Rider $6.98 60 60 .--. MIN MIN 21.5 mph Weekdays Weekends 1 Subsidy per Rider IF Average Daily Passengers Weekday $5.86 338 • Average Daily Passengers Weekends 165 91.0%1 Annual Passengers 104,060 • Passengers per Hour Passengers per Mile 19.1 1.2 15.91 87,415 Annual Wheelchair Boardings Annual Bicycle Boardings 749 2,100 • Population within .5 mi of stop 17,194 5,452 Jobs within .5 mi of stop 2,116 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 19 S►►HN9 (xis911 AGfNCY LINE 20— DESERT HOT SPRINGS —THOUSAND PALMS —PALM DESERT Line 20 provides limited stop service between the City of Desert Hot Springs and the City of Palm Desert. The Line 20 provides residents of Desert Hot Springs and surrounding communities improved access to resources and employment opportunities concentrated toward the center of the Coachella Valley, including the College of the Desert. Line 20 connects with Lines 14, 15, 32, 53, 54, 111 and Commuter Link 220 at Westfield Palm Desert Mall. 4TM ST DESERT HOT Rey 14 �S SPRINGS PERSON N u~i �3 ¢ TWO BUNCH PALMS 4 ,¢ is DILLON a N Fp �a Q TIME POINT PALM UNIVERSNY Q TRANSFER CITY HALL DESERT z © SENIOR CENTER 2 McCallum p z Thaaa O LIBRARY r iO ® MALL 21 32 54 111 220 HAHN FRL�WARING INDIAN SCHOOL ® WELLS Hoursof •.- •Span 7:00 AM 7:55 PM Weekdays No Weekend Service •R Financial Annual Route Cost $288,104 Annual Farebox Route Revenue $139,522 Cost per Rider $11.50 60 MIN Weekdays No Weekend Service M N Subsidy per Rider $21.78 W=3xLM!n_ 77 23.82 mph 2 Average Daily Passengers Weekday 98 On Average Daily Passengers Weekends N/A 85.0% Annual Passengers 25,062 RoutePassengers per Hour Passengers per Mile 7.03 0.30 48.51 Annual Revenue Miles: Annual Wheelchair Boardings 109 84,8741 Annual Bicycle Boardings 854 Hours:Annual Revenue Population within .5 mi of stop 11,229 35641 Jobs within .5 mi of stop 8,180 siding (Nissir 14611v$V SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 1 9 AL N116A LINE 21—GERALD FORD & COOK- PALM DESERT MALL Line 21 is a new route that provides service to the City of Palm Desert, enabling riders to access the College of the Desert, the McCallum Theater, Palm Desert City Hall, Kaiser Permanente, satellite campuses of California State University of San Bernadine, the University of California Riverside, Palm Desert High School, Palm Desert Library, major employment sites, medical and shopping centers. Line 21 connects with Lines 20, 32, 54, 111 and Commuter Line 222 at Westfield Palm Desert Mall. Q TIME POINT Q TRANSFER CITY HALL OS SENIOR CENTER © LIBRARY POST OFFICE �[ SCHOOL ® MALL PALM DESERT N A College of the Desert w : McCallum Theater I— z w U z ; o ;� WAHN O 20 32 54 ill 220 z Q DMV..,,� GERALD FORD UNIVERSITY COUNTRY CLUB rZ4 BERGER .-CSUSB 0 ..UCR Y 0 0 HOVLEY V Brandman Unviersity FRED WARIN G HWY 111 INDIAN WELLS 11:00 AM 3:50 PM Weekdays Annual Route Cost $98,787 No Weekend Service 60 MIN Weekdays Annual Farebox Route Revenue N/A Cost per Rider N/A Subsidy per Rider N/A No Weekend Service Average Speed: 25.8 mph 2 On Average Daily Passengers Weekday 51 Average Daily Passengers Weekends N/A 86.9% • • 13.8 Annual Passengers N/A Passengers per Hour 9.8 Passengers per Mile 1.40 19,992 Annual Wheelchair Boardings Annual Bicycle Boardings N/A N/A Population within .5 mi of stop 20,157 1,435 Jobs within .5 mi of stop 18,379 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • IY 2 0 1 8 2 0 1 9 199r►1111e rly"911 AsfNCr LINE 24-PALM SPRINGS In March 2017, Line 24 service was expanded to serve the Ramon/San Luis Rey retail area. Line 24 offers service in Palm Springs with connections to Lines 14, 30, 32, and 111. The Line 24 links riders to destinations such as the Desert Regional Hospital, Desert Highland Community Center, Social Security Administration, schools, medical facilities, theaters, and shopping outlets. 0 0 > ROSA PARKS Cs4SE�� 111 STEVENS z �i a 0 TIME POINT Q TRANSFER Ift CITYHALL 0 SENIOR CENTER LIBRARY © HOSPITAL �[ SCHOOL t SELECTEDTRIP WEEKDAY ON LY SAN RAFAEL —4 1111111RACQUET CLUB O� 4� �*11111a VISTA CHINO TACHEVAH BARISTO I PALM SPRINGS N A Palm Springs International Airport Riverside C—ty Family Health Center � � LL RAMON r w 30 SUNNY DUNES 44 Hoursof Operation: Service S• . AM 8:25 PM Weekdays Annual Route Cost $799,337 FLL�5:20 6:18 AM 7:38 PM Weekends Annual Farebox Route Revenue $284,473 Frequency:Cost 40 MIN Weekdays per Rider Subsidy per Rider $4.94 $7.49 60 MIN Weekends .•-. 14.66 mph 4 Average Daily Passengers Weekday 544 • Average Daily Passengers Weekends 211 82.5%1 Annual Passengers 161,799 •LA Passengers per Hour 12.4 20.3 Passengers per Mile 1.13 Annual Wheelchair Boardings Annual Bicycle Boardings 1,638 4,143 143,616 • Population within .5 mi of stop 22,374 13,070 Jobs within .5 mi of stop 10,955 SnnL►ne (Nissir 4611v$V SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 all LINE 30—CATHEDRAL CITY— PALM SPRINGS Line 30 is one of SunLine's most successful routes. In March 2017, Line 30 was realigned to serve Tahquitz Canyon Drive at El Cielo to provide riders with more frequency in this area. Line 30 is a Trunk line providing service between the cities of Cathedral City and Palm Springs. Riding the Line 30 provides customers access to the Palm Springs International Airport, Palm Springs City Hall, Social Security Administration, public libraries, city halls, senior centers, schools, shopping centers and various industrial parks. It operates with 20- minute frequency during weekday peak periods, connecting to Lines 14, 24, 32, and 111 The Line 30 also offers three afternoon supplementary trips to accommodate the high volume of student ridership. The most recent Operational Analysis proposed fifteen - minute frequency for this trunk route. Frequency changes are under study and are subject to available funding and Board approval. BARISTO 14 rJ TAHQUITZ 24 BARISTO _ RAMON 0 W J z < Z PALM SPRINGS RAMON o 32 J W C V J J W d 4 Social Security Office DINAH SHORE O� N A O TIME POINT E. PALM CYN Z TRANSFER HALL Z Jill wCITY SENIOR CENTER}'V BSTLIBRARY CrN CATHEDRAL ® POST OFFICE CITY 40,t SCHOOL CATHEDRAL C11 Hours of •.Span 5:40 AM 10:44 PM Weekdays Financial Annual Route Cost $1,423,353 6:15 AM 9:41 PM Weekends Annual Farebox Route Revenue $481,788 Cost per Rider $2.07 20 MIN Weekdays Subsidy per Rider $3.30 40 MIN Weekends 12.7 mph 9 Average Daily Passengers Weekday 2,176 On Average Daily Passengers Weekends 1,212 93.1%1 Annual Passengers 686,776 - - Passengers per Hour 27.1 19.3 Passengers per Mile 2.50 Annual Wheelchair Boardings 5,132 274,423 Annual Bicycle Boardings 23,891 Hours:Annual Revenue Population within .5 mi of stop 34,329 25,356 Jobs within .5 mi of stop 16,652 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 19 S►►HN9 (HAN 911 AG 1NCY LINE 32-PALM SPRINGS -CATHEDRAL CITY -THOUSAND PALMS -RANCHO MIRAGE -PALM DESERT Line 32 links the cities of Palm Springs, Cathedral City, and the unincorporated community Thousand Palms, Rancho Mirage and Palm Desert. The route connects with Lines 14, 20, 24, 30, 53, 54, 111, and Commuter Link 220. Riders can access schools and various retail centers along Ramon Road in the City of Cathedral City. Routing through the 1-10 Interchange provides access to Costco, Home Depot, and the Regal Cinemas 16 theater complex, as well as service to the Agua Caliente Casino on Ramon Road at Bob Hope Drive. This route also provides service to Eisenhower Medical Center, College of the Desert, and Westfield Palm Desert Mall. VISTACHINO g 14 J_ � THOUSAND AVE 30 9G�p a PALMS a<o MISSION Palm RAMON RAMON Springs Air Museum rj 30 SwUne's Main Offices s 30 32505 Harry Oliver Tmil CATHEDRAL OINAH SHORE PALM CITY o , SPRINGS $ w m o m o C RANCHO N A MIRAGE COUNTRY CLUB } C) TIME POINT y College w Of the Q TRANSFER z Z (4 MALL o Desert © HOSPITAL 2p�� zw :McCallum Sq RLz I Theater � LIBRARY>>> o� �O ® POST OFPIcE 220 FRED PALM SCHOOL HAHN WARING DESERT HWY 111 Hours of Operation: 5:00 AM 10:40 PM Weekdays Annual Route Cost $1,084,816 6:54 AM 10:48 PM Weekends Annual Farebox Route Revenue $343,351 • Cost per Rider $4.37 50 MIN Weekdays 60 MIN Weekends Average Speed: Peak Vehicles Subsidy per Rider Ridership Average Daily Passengers Weekday $9.16 An 785 18.7 mph 3 • Average Daily Passengers Weekends 443 81.1% Annual Passengers 248,350 40.4 Passengers per Hour 14.9 Passengers per Mile 0.9 Annual Wheelchair Boardings 1,344 279,031 Annual Bicycle Boardings 9,059 Population within .5 mi of stop 37,261 16,723 1 Jobs within .5 mi of stop 21,864 91 siding (N9 NSI1 1461N$V SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 1 9 92 LINE 54-PALM DESERT -INDIAN WELLS -LAQUINTA-BERMUDADUNES - INDIO Line 54 operates between Palm Desert and Indio serving the cities of Indian Wells and La Quinta as well as the unincorporated community of Bermuda Dunes via Fred Waring Drive. This route was designed to provide direct service between Palm Desert and Indio, in addition to serving the length of Fred Waring Drive. Service is provided to the Indio Workforce Development, College of the Desert (Indio and Palm Desert), McCallum Theater, Civic Center, along with close proximity to Indian Wells Tennis Gardens. Line 54 connects with Lines 20, 32, 53, 70, 80, 81, 90, 91, 95, 111, and Commuter Link 220 at Westfield Palm Desert Mall and Hwy 111 at Flower. U FRED WARING 20 21 32 11'l WE LINE 54 00 weam Q ® �V Colleae of the Desert McCallum Theater z o a U w z w sr q n no o nL nol 3 as N SYR11170e AIRRNRII RRENCY 191) (2 202 '28 zz3� 4 �44 (241 L2s3) Iza ses O ��� r2sa� �1e1 IZB1, zea 7. - 77 (zd� O 70 O OU Q Z J Q U to PALM INDIAN DESERT WELLS LA QUNITA College of the Desert Indio Campus w D �: z O. Y 121 1� Q HOOVER ;isREQUA 0 ra�1 (sa '83 HWY tip'+ so 81 111 INDIO Effective May 6, 2018 5:55 AM 7:55 PM Weekdays Annual Route Cost $412,826 No Weekend Service Annual Farebox Route Revenue $183,908 • Cost per Rider $5.49 45 MIN Weekdays No Weekend Service Subsidy per Rider $11.70 2 Average Daily Passengers Weekday 294 ;21.34;mph • Average Daily Passengers Weekends N/A 84.1% Annual Passengers 75,157 Route- - Passengers per Hour Passengers per Mile 11.2 0.7 24.3 Annual Wheelchair Boardings 337 113,426 Annual Bicycle Boardings 2,478 • Population within .5 mi of stop 37,729 6,731 Jobs within .5 mi of stop 13,900 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 1 9 SJUH ► 9 (Hissir AGf NCY LINE 70—LAQU I NTA— PALM DESERT —INDIAN WELLS—BERMUDADUNES Line 70 offers bus service to the City of La Quinta and the edge of the cities of Palm Desert and Indian Wells and the unincorporated community of Bermuda Dunes. Riders are able to access the Indian Wells Tennis Gardens on Washington Street at Fred Waring Drive, city hall, the senior center, schools, and various shopping centers along Adams Street, Avenue 47, and Washington Street. Transfers from the Line 70 to the Line 111 can be made on Highway 111 at Adams Street. COUNTRY CLUB N SunLine is evaluating extending service north of the 1-10 A HARRIS. a BERMUDA Z DUNES Freeway if it can be done without increasing operating ° PALM Z costs. The implementation of proposed changes are DESERT subject to available funding and Board approval. 3 INDIAN WELLS O TIME POINT % Q TRANSFER AVE 47 CITY HALL Z 'Z POST OFFICE LIBRARY Z SENIOR CENTER SCHOOL TAM PICO G Cl LA QUINTA COVE 5:15 AM 8:45 PM Weekdays Annual Route Cost $599,710 5:15 AM 9:30 PM Weekends Annual Farebox Route Revenue $236,728 Cost per Rider $3.33 45 MIN Weekdays Subsidy per Rider $6.78 90 MIN Weekends 15.85 mph 4 Average Daily Passengers Weekday 611 Average Daily Passengers Weekends 223 On 87.2% Route Total Bidirectional Length (Miles): 19.5 Annual Passengers 180,326 Passengers per Hour 19.6 Passengers per Mile 1.4 Annual Wheelchair Boardings 574 131,688 Annual Bicycle Boardings 5,595 Population within .5 mi of stop 27,982 9,9411 Jobs within .5 mi of stop I9,943 93 Snnl►ne SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 (N AN SIT A fNrr LINE 80 —INDIO Line 80 operates in a clockwise loop serving residents of the City of Indio, providing access to John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Riverside County Fair and National Date Festival, Social Security Administration, Employment Development Department, Indio Senior Center, Boys and Girls Club, Riverside County Social Services Offices, Department of Motor Vehicles, Martha's Village & Kitchen, community centers, schools, and shopping centers. Two afternoon trips to Shadow Hills High School on Jefferson Street at Avenue 39 are provided. Line 80 connects to Lines 54, 81, 90, 91, and 111 at the transfer location on Highway 111 at Flower Street. AVE 38 Q.Fti AVE 39 A - 2m s: <: AVE40 AVE 41 W a 0 AVE 42 �^ =D ............. 5odal Sernces A�a, Q�- " 1NDIO AVE 44 o w ■■■■■■■■■■■■s 54 81 HOOVER a ■ 0MV Q nME POINT Sunline's Q RANSFER Indio Z Indio Facility cITY HAu carer a SHADOW © HOSPITAL Q 3 PALM o: © SENIOR CENTER AVE 46 REQUA ■ ■ i ■ CQ LIBRARY !( SCHOOL z Z $1 4t Q 54 1 ■ I SELECTED TRIP ONLY j 81 U 111 © DR CARREON m N W CwMyF NH O MW x z � a AVE 48 Hoursof Operation: 6:00 AM 9:00 PM Weekdays Annual Route Cost $332,957 6:00 AM 9:00 PM Weekends Annual Farebox Route Revenue $196,575 FrequencCost 60 MIN Weekdays per Rider $2.36 Subsidy per Rider $5.79 60 MIN Weekends 11.2 mph 3 Average Daily Passengers Weekday 458 On Average Daily Passengers Weekends 225 85.2%1 Annual Passengers 141,170 • - 11.021 Passengers per Hour 27.4 Passengers per Mile 2.0 Annual Wheelchair Boardings 1124 71,909 Annual Bicycle Boardings 3,000 "M Population within .5 mi of stop 39,132 6,077 Jobs within .5 mi of stop 7,554 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 19 S►►HN9 (HANS17 AGfANY LINE 81—INDIO Line 81 is a loop route that operates counter -clockwise and provides transit service to residents of the City of Indio, enabling passengers access to John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Riverside County Fair and National Date Festival, Employment Development Department, U.S. Social Security Administration, East Valley College of the Desert campus, Riverside County social services offices, Department of Motor Vehicles, Coachella Valley Cultural Museum, the Indio transportation center, community centers, library, schools, and a shopping centers. Two morning trips are provided to accommodate commuting students, service to Shadow Hills High School on Jefferson Street at Avenue 39 was implemented. Line 81 connects to Lines 54, 80, 90, 91 and 111 at the transfer location on Highway 111 at Flower Street. 411111111111111. t O AVE 39 Z n b� o. : f111111111111• AVE40 AVE 41 :............... p f 80 AVE 42 ■11111111111• x z: OU U� Hnm�o�,m �mceme` �^ INDIO BO AVE44 ............. sa ao a DMV � nnieaolNr EaWC P cv M�se� w • Indio Trans onavon m• Cente Q TR0.NSFCR MILES F • ■ CALL ■ SENIORCEMER g f MILL ieenn[eMe� O O REQl10. i'O N alHOSPITAL HWV111 ■ 11 SELEC1EOi91P0NLY 0 Q s HWV 1f1 &FLOWEF: Hours of •.Span 5:30 AM 8:30 PM Weekdays Financial Annual Route Cost $335,170 5:30 AM 8:30 PM Weekends Annual Farebox Route Revenue $111,775 1 Cost per Rider $3.75 60 MIN Weekdays Subsidy per Rider $5.13 60 MIN Weekends ML 10.69 mph 3 Average Daily Passengers Weekday 296 On Average Daily Passengers Weekends 127 89.1%1 Annual Passengers 89,266 TotalRoute Passengers per Hour 15.7 8.71 Passengers per Mile 1.6 Annual Revenue Miles: I Annual Wheelchair Boardings 777 55,230 Annual Bicycle Boardings 1,011 Annual Revenue Hours: Population within .5 mi of stop 32,477 5,753 Jobs within .5 mi of stop 7,631 Mlw siding (NANNII AV[IV Fr SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 we LINE 90—INDIO—COACHELLA Line 90 serves the cities of Coachella and Indio allowing passengers to access the Employment Development Department, Coachella City Hall, library, senior center, Boys & Girls Club, local schools, and shopping centers. Connections to Lines 54, 80, 81, 91, 95 and 111 occur at the transfer location on Highway 111 at Flower Street in the City of Indio. INDIO O TIME POINT Q TRANSFER CITY HALL © HOSPITAL a A DR CARREON AVE 48 z w m m z AVE 50 G 9195111 c� sG2 A�'r9 AVE 52 r z az p �¢ it Cr = AVE 53 w COACHELLA Operation:Hours of 5:00 AM 10:00 PM Weekdays Annual Route Cost $347,828 5:00 AM 9:00 PM Weekends Annual Farebox Route Revenue $639,750 60 MIN Weekdays Cost per Rider $2.47 Subsidy per Rider $14.49 60 MIN M618mph Weekends 2 Average Daily Passengers Weekday 430 On 84.2%1 Average Daily Passengers Weekends Annual Passengers 287 140,831 Passengers per Hour 16.0 12.96 Passengers per Mile 1.9 Annual Wheelchair Boardings 1,478 72,891 Annual Bicycle Boardings 2,838 Population within .5 mi of stop 44,655 6,012 Jobs within .5 mi of stop 7,051 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 19 S►►HN9 (xis911 AGfNCY LINE 91—INDIO—COACHELLA—THERMAL —MECCA —OASIS Line 91 links the cities of Indio and Coachella with the unincorporated communities of Thermal, Mecca, and Oasis. Riders on Line 91 are able to connect to Lines 54, 80, 81, 90, 95 and 111 at the transfer location on Highway 111 and Flower Street in Indio. Passengers have access to employment sites, medical, and shopping facilities. Line 91 also provides direct service to College of the Desert's East Valley Campus in Mecca. © TIME POINT Q TRANSFER DE2 POST OFFICE 0 MEDICAL fANA � ` Z[ SCHOOL ■ SELECTEOTRIP ONLY COACHELLA 1 rr 9795 ? 1, •� Z Q COT] AVE 54 Z a Meccallhermal Campus Z O z V 7 m AVE 62 a AIRPORTBLVD AVE 57 Mecca/Thermal THERMAL ti\ Torres - Martinez Heath Center Zt AVE 66 OASIS �9p O P> MARTINE2 Mountain U V'ew Estates, , , , a n AVE 70 MECCA I 5th . HOME Riverside County 9j Library & Family Health Center ; Hours of Operation: •. 4:48 AM 10:21 PM Weekdays Annual Route Cost $1,145,415 5:30 AM 10:42 PM Weekends Annual Farebox Route Revenue $336,550 Cost per Rider $6.33 60 MIN Weekdays Subsidy per Rider $17.28 60 MIN Weekends 22.80 mph 3 Average Daily Passengers Weekday 548 Average Daily Passengers Weekends 380 On 85.7% Annual Passengers 181,092 • . Passengers per Hour 12.60 51.111 Passengers per Mile 0.6 315,922 Annual Wheelchair Boardings Annual Bicycle Boardings 460 4,423 Population within .5 mi of stop 41,181 17,300 Jobs within .5 mi of stop 8,996 97 J Mine (N9NS/1 A6fN$V SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 LINE 95— COACHELLA— MECCA— NORTH SHORE Line 95 serves the cities of Coachella and the unincorporated communities of Mecca and North Shore. The Line 95 serves the College of the Desert's East Valley Campus in Mecca. Passengers on Line 95 connect to Lines 90, 91 and 111 at the transfer location on 5th and Vine Avenue in Coachella. Service allows passengers to access employment sites, medical, and shopping facilities. AVE 50 COACHELLA 0 TIMEPOIMT Q TRANSFER W O MEDICAL J it AVE 52 '*_t SCHOOL SELECTED TRIP ONLY S k n 90 �` N 91 AIRPORT A 11 � THERMAL /l`�'o� AVE 57 AVE SB /-� coo Z "Mecca 1 Thermal z*r campus \ v AVE fit m ? MECCA Riverside County Sth Library and HOME Family Health Center ~ AVE 66 SHORE Hours of •.Span 4:00 AM 10:00 PM Weekdays Financial Annual Route Cost $430,014 4:00 AM 10:00 PM Weekends Annual Farebox Route Revenue Cost per Rider $118,172 $15.06 180 MIN Weekdays 180 MIN Weekends Speed:Average 32.71 mph 1 Subsidy per Rider Ridership Average Daily Passengers Weekday $32.11 89 • Average Daily Passengers Weekends 55 87.9% Annual Passengers 28,556 ' • - - Passengers per Hour 7.0 52.49 Passengers per Mile 0.2 Annual Wheelchair Boardings 54 114,938 Annual Bicycle Boardings 679 Population within .5 mi of stop 19,050 6,339 1 Jobs within .5 mi of stop 6,710 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 19 S►►r►1►ne (HANS17 AGfANY LINE Ill —PALM SPRINGS —CATHEDRAL CITY — RANCHO MIRAGE — PALM DESERT — INDIAN WELLS — LA QUINTA - INDIO Line 111 is SunLine's highest ridership regional trunk route. Line 111 provides service along Highway 111 from Palm Springs to Coachella, linking with the Cities of Cathedral City, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, Indian Wells, La Quinta and Indio. Line 111 enables riders to travel to destinations along the Highway 111 corridor. The route links passengers with major retail and commercial centers, recreational attractions, museums, educational and medical institutions. Connecting routes include Lines 14, 20, 24, 30, 32, 53, 54, 70, 80, 81, 90, 91, 95 and Commuter Link 220 at transfer locations at Westfield Palm Desert Mall. VISTA CHINO STEVENS } I 24 HWY & I © oo ♦Z m¢ EPALM CYN BARISTO oa 14 t 30Z� Co lege otthe Desert 9 zw McCallumTheater 111 - N pA4Mcr CATHEDRAL 11ST 5�0 z v 54 N_ _ {,CITY 22 0�� 80 PALM f` 34 �/!y ~ FRED WARING "VOID g'� CATHEDRAL Y�. SPRINGS CITY O PALM y DESERT N RANCHO yam, A MIRAGE 70 z C] TIME POINT LIBRARY PALM o O- HWY 111 © DESERT INDIAN G a� - irIO QTRANSFER ® MALL CITY HALL O SENIOR CENTER © HOSPITAL 4_0t SCHOOL Z 0 4 WELLS LA®� y^ QUINT % Bus stops #704&a980at U w: �S� CP � Hwy 111 a La Quinta Ctr Dr COACHELL� COACHELLA are also served by AMTRAK Hours of Operation: 5:00 AM 11:00 PM Weekdays Annual Route Cost $4,360,905 5:30 AM 11:00 PM Weekends Annual Farebox Route Revenue $1,849,976 Cost per Rider $3.12 20/30 MIN Weekdays (Peak/Off-Pea Subsidy per Rider $5.63 20/30 MIN Weekends Average Speed:Ridership 17.64 mph 13 Average Daily Passengers Weekday 4,209 • Average Daily Passengers Weekends 2,985 80.9% Annual Passengers 1,396,966 .RIM Passengers per Hour 20.5 60.0 Passengers per Mile 1.4 Annual Wheelchair Boardings 9,425 1,006,559 Annual Bicycle Boardings 56,819 Population within .5 mi of stop 78,704 67,995 Jobs within .5 mi of stop 48,948 mo siding (N9NS1T 4611v$t SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8- 2 0 19 100 COMMUTER LINK 220 PALM DESERT —THOUSAND PALMS —CABAZON—BEAUMONT— MORENO VALLEY— RIVERSIDE Commuter Link 220 provides service between the Coachella Valley and western Riverside County. The route is 77 miles, with 2 stops in the Coachella Valley, located at Westfield Palm Desert Mall and Thousand Palms Transit Hub off Varner Road. The routes continues, stopping along Interstate 10 and State Route 60 serving the Casino Morongo, City of Beaumont at the Walmart Shopping Center, Moreno Valley at the Moreno Valley Mall, the University of California Riverside, and ending at Metrolink's Riverside Station. Line 220 connects to SunLine's Lines 20, 32, 53, 54, and 111, Pass Transit in Beaumont and Banning, Metrolink, RTA, and Omnitrans services in Riverside. Riverside Metrolink Station UCR Lot 30 N CASINO A �i MORONGO RIVERSIDE 60 62 MORENO BEAUMONT CABAZON VALLEY WalMart THOUSAND PALMS PALM DESERT F4RE FARE ZONE 2 Cahazon to Riverside Palm Desert to Thousand Palms Hoursof Operation: Service S• . 4:30 AM 10:00 PM Weekdays Annual Route Cost $323,700 No Weekend Service Annual Farebox Route Revenue $161,548 • Cost per Rider $24.05 6 TRIPS Weekdays Subsidy per Rider. $66.01 No Weekend Service Speed:Average 29.51 mph 2 Ridership Average Daily Passengers Weekday 53 • Average Daily Passengers Weekends N/A 62.6%1 Annual Passengers 13,458 ' • Passengers per Hour 4.1 148.261 Passengers per Mile 0.1 Annual Wheelchair Boardings 172 112,979 Annual Bicycle Boardings 337 • Population within .5 mi of stop 19,890 3,767 Jobs within .5 mi of stop 38,841 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN • F Y 2 0 1 8/ 2 0 19 S►►HN9 (xis911 AGfNCY FY 2018/2019 1 FY 2020/2021 S ali�9 TBA AGfN SunLine Transit Agency 32505 Harry Oliver Trail, Thousand Palms, CA 92276 1 760-343-3456 1 sunline.org AGENDA ITEM 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Lorelle Moe -Luna, Planning and Programming Manager John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Update on the Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of a Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive an update and presentation on the Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of a Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In January 2017, the Commission approved the award for a regional truck study and development and implementation of a regional logistics mitigation fee to WSP USA, formerly Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. The study is the result of the settlement agreement between the Commission, the county of Riverside (County), city of Moreno Valley (Moreno Valley), and Highland Fairview in response to litigation involving the World Logistics Center (WLC). The Commission and the County had filed suit challenging the environmental impact report in order to ensure adequate mitigation to address added impacts created by the WLC project. Additional lawsuits were filed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District and a number of environmental organizations. The eventual settlement agreement was finalized to provide needed funding for infrastructure efforts that would help mitigate the impacts of this kind of development throughout the County and to do so in a way that would encourage ongoing economic development and job creation for County residents. A key provision of the settlement requires the Commission, the County, Moreno Valley, and Highland Fairview to conduct a regional transportation study to evaluate a logistics -related regional fee. A result of the study could be a new program that the County and cities in the County could adopt. Such a program would, for example, set a fee on new distribution center warehouses, based on facility size, to help pay for highway improvements. This fee would differ from existing Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Programs in that it would only focus on highway projects, as compared to the regional TUMF Programs, which collect funds for regional arterials and local streets. Agenda Item 9 602 If the County or at least 75 percent of the Commission's member cities adopt a regional warehouse fee within two years after a final court judgment is issued, Highland Fairview will pay 65 cents per square foot for each operating warehouse within the WLC. If no regional fee is adopted, the fee would be 50 cents per square foot. Proceeds would be used for projects identified as part of the regional truck study. Project Status Upon approval of the award in January 2017, the study was kicked off in spring 2017 and is projected to be completed by summer 2018. The scope of work includes five tasks with deliverables as summarized in the table below: Task/Scope Deliverables Task 1: Existing and Future Conditions Analysis Technical • Inventory existing and forecasted (2040) logistics facilities in the Memorandum on County, analyze the various types of logistics facilities, the Existing and Future functions that they serve, and the types of businesses that utilize Conditions (October them. 2017) • Quantify truck traffic and impacts on the highway system related to existing and forecasted (2040) logistics facilities in the County; describe the nature of the truck trips such as origin/destination, type of cargo, time -of -day, and equipment. Task 2: Funding and Cost Analysis Technical • Identify and quantify currently available funding sources and Memorandum on mechanisms to offset impacts of logistics facilities in the County. Funding Gap Report • Identify and quantify costs of addressing existing deficiencies in (March 2018) highway infrastructure in the County. Task 3: Nexus Study Technical • Establish the relationship between growth of logistics -related Memorandum on facilities within the County, truck traffic growth, and the needed Logistics Facility improvements to mitigate such growth. Regional Nexus Study (May 2018) Task 4: Fee Allocation Structure and Implementing Mechanism Technical Memorandum on Fee • Design a fee program based on the research and review of existing and similar fess throughout the County and other states Allocation Structure with consideration to the legal, political, and practical and Implementing implications; conduct an economic elasticity analysis that Mechanism Plan (June measures the impact of a logistics -related facilities mitigation 2018) Agenda Item 9 603 fee, particularly focused on local employment and economic development. • The proposed fee program will, at minimum, include: legal requirements; actions required by the Commission and other local jurisdictions; implementation mechanism; fee schedule; anticipated revenues; parameters of expenditures from fee revenues; and timeframe of the fee program. Task 5: Study Recommendations Technical • A compilation of all information gathered from all tasks to make Memorandum on findings and recommendations to the Commission on actions it Study can take to establish a new regional logistics -related facilities Recommendations, mitigation fee in the County. Final Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Study Document, including Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fees (August 2018) Darren Henderson, WSP USA Project Manager, will provide a presentation on the completed technical memorandums, discuss the data that has been gathered and analyzed, and highlight critical steps for moving forward. There is no financial impact for this item. Agenda Item 9 .1A RCTC REGIONALTRUCK STUDY AND DEVPM ENT A N D I M PUM ENTA11O N OF REGIONAL LOGISTICS M I11GA11O N FEE RIVERSIDE COUNTYTRANSPORTA11ON COMMISSION ME JUN E 13, 2018 Lorelle Moe -Luna, Planning & Programming Manager Darren Henderson, WSP, Project Manager Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Background PROPOSER WORLD i LOGISTICS CENTER PROJECT �- - WALYPTUSAVE o EUC:.LYPdAW � i Wall LogWks Cellar- Speare Plan 6oundsry d Aporban of me Marerp Ngnianas 3pec�hc Mn 212-1 Iaaeleo avW�Oe al We Prop±_•_ Nbrld Lug Wks Canter SpWiNe Plan Boundary [P.P..d Dpen Spate zone] AL ESSANL] l VO 'Pd l Note Na Banaary y ALMAH R06LW e Oa EAAVE CACTUS "E a V T - - - - ' 4 ' R1 S _ v A • A master -planned development planned for40.6 million square feet • La rg e -sc a le logistics operations • Covers2,610 acres Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Background • World Logistics Center Settlement • Ea c h p a rty to c o ntrib ute $250,000 .-HIGH LAN CFAIRMEW MOREN0 VALLEY W ILFRE ❑REAMS SOAR SF.TTI_FMENT AGREF.MEPIT This settlement agreement ("Agreement") is made at Riverside, Caiifornis, as of July j, 2016, between THE CQUAlTY OF RIVERSIDE. (the "County"} and the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (the "RCTC' ), on the one hand, and the CITY OF MORENO VALLEY and the MORENO VALLEY 2_ Highland Fairview. the City, the County and the RCTC will each contribute, directly or indirectly, S250,000, for a total of S1.000,000, to be used For an RCTC-conducted regional transportation study to cyaluatc a logistics-rclatw d regional fee. The contributions shall be submitted to the RCTC and shall he managed according to its regular accounting RIVERSIDE ...regional transportation study to COUNTY TRANSPOCOMMI SRIONTION evaluate a logistics -related regional fee... 7 these funds at any time, RIVERSIDEC0UNITY TRANSPORTAl1ON COMMISSION MF_E11NG, JUNE13, 2018 Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Project Status E g and Future Conditions Analysis Completed October2017 2) Funding and Cost Analysis Completed March 2018 3) Nexus Stud y 4) Fee Allocation Structure & Implementing Mechanism 5) Study Recommendations To be completed early sum mer2018 To be completed summer 2018 To be completed late sum mer2018 RIVERSIDECOUNTYTRANSPORTATON COMMISSION MF_ETNG, JUNE13, 2018 RCTC Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Outline of Topics • Fee Program Ba sic s — Fee Program Requirements • Study Background — Participation — Approach/Major Study Tasks • Completed Tasks — Identifying Deficiencies — Attributing Share of Impact — Estimating the Cost of Needed Improvements — Draft Logisticsand Warehouse Impact Fee • Next Steps RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MF_ETNG, JUNE13, 2018 Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee r"ee Program Basics RIVERSIDECOUNTYTRANSPORTATON COMMISSION MF_ETNG, JUNE13, 2018 Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Fee Program Requirements • California Mitigation Fee Act: ■ Must establish a rational nexus✓ reasonable relationship between the infrastructure need and development impact ■ Fees must be roughly proportional with the impactsof development and the cost of the infrastructure ■ A development doesnot have to exclusively benefitfrom the infrastructure but can substantially benefitfrom the overall improvement in regional mobility ➢ A NexusSltudyisprepared to fulfill these requirements RIVERSIDECOUNIYIRANSPORTATON COMMISSION MF_ETNG, JUNE 13, 2018 Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Fee Program Requirements ■ An impact fee cannot mitigate forexisting deficiencies. ■ Existing needsand similar impactsfrom outside Riverside County (pass -through trips) must be excluded from a fee. ■ No overlap with the WRCOG and CVAG IUMFprograms, this study focusesonly on mainline freeway truck impacts and mitigation (which are not a part of eitherlUMF). RIVERSIDECOUNTYTRANSPORTATON COMMISSION MF_ETNG, JUNE13, 2018 Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Study Background RIVERSIDECOUNTYTRANSPORTATON COMMISSION MF_ETNG, JUNE13, 2018 Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Study Participation r*-&1&arw- NAIOP TM INN OVATIN0 FOR ABETTER TOM ORB OW FEHR� PEERS 1 s A Cou H.JGGevcr�n-m Cities Qthe rs RIVERSIDECOUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MF_ETNG, JUNE 13, 2018 Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Major Study Tasks 1) Existing and Future ConditionsAnalysis ✓ Forecast logisticsgrowth ✓ Forecast truck trips ✓ Identify capacity deficiencies 2) Funding and Cost Analysis ✓ Attribute d efic ie nc ies to ✓ Estimate project costs ✓ Compute fee amount new logisticsdevelopment 3) Nexus Stud y ✓ Prepare report to establish the relationship between logistics -related fa c ilitie s g rowth, truck traffic, and the imp rove m e nts to mitigate such growth Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Completed Tasks RIVERSIDECOUNTYTRANSPORTATON COMMISSION MF_ETNG, JUNE13, 2018 Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Forecast Log istic s G rowth EDD Warehouse and other Transportation 200,000 Employment Extrapolated Trends [Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario MSA] 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Histo ric a I (Forecast O N 1:t lD 00 O N 1::T lD 00 O N 1::T Q0 N � lN I 00 O D W O lD M O Ql Ol Ol Ol M O O O O O r -I r-I r-I r-I r-I N N N N N � M M M M M Q1 Ol 01 a> M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 N V N CCV N N N CV rA CV N N fV N N N CV N N N CV ■ Warehouse Non -Warehouse Source: California Employment Development Department (®D) Industry Enployment Data forRverside-San Bemardino-Ontario Metropolitan 3atisticalArea (MS4) Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Forecast Log istic s G rowth • EDD warehouse employment trend forecast wasused for modeling purposes • EDD employment trend forecast was multiplied by 2,241 square feet peremployee ratio from NAIOPLogistics Trends and �)ecific Industriesthat Will Drive Warehouse and Distribution Growth and Demand for,$ace, March 2010 Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Forecast Truck Tiips Truck Traffic O-D Distribution by Route Heavy -Duty Trucks Medium -Duty Trucks State Route No. Link Riverside SLAG Riverside SCAG 74 1 ❑ 21% — 93% 40% 99% 91 2= 26%— 941; 1 37% 98% 71 3 ❑ 21% — 84% ❑ 28% 93% 60 4 ❑ 22% — 93f. ❑ 26% 95% 15 5 ❑ 18% — 90% ❑ 25% 92% Woe 215 6 0 34% 39% 94% _ 10 7 ❑ 33% �4% I❑ 41% 85% • • 62 8 ❑ 28% —o ❑ 42% 98% generate 15 9I_ 1%1 1%� 1% 1% 79 101 _ 2%1 6%0 7% 15% within -r 86 11 ❑ 27% 32% 85% those 111 12 ❑ 32% 31% 88% 78 13 ❑ 21% _ 43% ❑ 23% 47% • • • 10 14 0% 0% 0% 0% the e 95 15❑ 13%_ 32%❑ 23% 40% 177 16 ❑ 26% — 53% ❑ 41% 61% • ' • • 60 1711 55% —8% 61% 88% 60 18 0 55% 65% 9 ° 215 19 52%- a% 60% 60 20 ❑ 45% - -0 0 52% 96% 91 21i❑ 44% 62% 98% • 91 22 43%63% 97% 215 23 ❑ 48% M ff73°/ 66% 86% 215 24 ❑ 26% - 36% 66% 79% 15 25 ❑ 26% - 37% 56% 74% 215 26 ❑ 18% 26% 55% 61% 10 �� 43% 72% 55% �_ 84% 10 28 C 41% - 62% 63% �__&0% 10 29 ❑ 32% - 41% ❑ 33% _ 39% Bandwidth reflects proportional increased volume Largest increases in truck flowswould occur on SR-60 and 1-215 I I V i Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Attributing the Share of Impacts • Adjust for the following factors: — Existing capacity deficiency Share of future traffic growth that isattributable to other development activity — Passthrough tripsthat have a trip end outside Riverside County • Accomplished by comparing base model run to model run that separates warehouse and logistics uses RIVERSIDECOUNTYTRANSPORTATON COMMISSION MF_ETNG, JUNE13, 2018 Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Attributing the Share of Impacts ID Route Name Dir Beginning End Segment Length (mi) 2040 Max V/C Recommended Improvement Deficiency Attributable to New Logistics Trucking 1 SR-79 S Rancho California Rd 1.0 1.01 Add aux lane between the on -and off -ramps 1% Rancho California Rd Winchester Rd 1.1 1.01 1% 2 Winchester Rd Lane Add south of 1-15/1-215 Split 0.7 1.08 Add aux lane between the on -ramp and the lane add 1% 3 NB Clinton Keith Rd Baxter Rd 0.8 1.03 Add aux lane between the on- and off -ramps 0.3% 4 El Cerrito Rd Ontario Ave 0.2 1.03 Add aux lane between the on- and off -ramps 1% 5 I-15 Norco Dr/6th Street Limonite Ave 2.0 1.14 Add aux lane between the on- and off -ramps 1% 6 Cantu Galeano Ranch Rd Limonite Ave 1.3 1.02 Add aux lane between the on -and off -ramps 4% 5% Limonite Ave Norco Dr/6th Street 2.0 1.04 7 SB El Cerrito Rd Dos Lagos Dr 2.1 1.09 Widen mainline to 4lanes 2% 8 Temescal Canyon Rd Indian Truck Trail 2.2 1.01 Add aux lane between the on- and off -ramps 1% 9 SR-60 EB Rubidoux Blvd Market St 0.8 1.03 Add aux lane between the on -and off -ramps 1° Market St Main St 0.1 1.06 39% 10 Box Springs Rd Central Ave 0.4 1.07 Add aux lane between the on -and off -ramps 14% Watkins Dr Martin Luther King Jr 0.8 38% 10C NB University Ave Off -Ramp Upstream of Univ Ave On -ramp 0.4 1.04 Add aux lane upstream of the on -ramp to the off -ramp 13% 11 I-215 Center St Off -Ramp Riverside County Line/Iowa Ave 0.5 1.03 Add aux lane between the off -ramp and the county line 12% 12 SB Martin Luther King Jr Sycamore Canyon Rd Van Buren Blvd Harley Knox Blvd 1.6 1.2 1.25 1.06 Add aux lane between the on- and off -ramps Add aux lane between the on- and off -ramps 4% 13 Riverside County Line Green River Rd Off -Ramp 0.8 1.23 Add aux lane from the county line to Green River Rd. off -ramp 1% 14 Green River Rd Off -Ramp SR-71 1.3 1.02 Widen mainline to 6lanes 10% SR-71 Serfas Club Dr Off -Ramp 1.4 1.27 Widen mainline to 6 lanes 1% 15 NB Serfas Club Dr Off -Ramp Grand Blvd Off -Ramp 2.3 1.23 Widen mainline to 5 lanes 9% 16 SR-91 On -Ramp from SB 1-15 On -Ramp from NB 1-15 0.3 1.07 Add aux lane 8% 17 McKinley St Off -Ramp Pierce St 1.6 1.14 Widen mainline to 4 lanes 10% 18 Magnolia Ave La Sierra Ave 0.3 1.00 Add aux lane between the ramps 8% Serfas Club Dr Off -Ramp Lane Add at SR-71 2.3 1.12 Widen mainline to 5 lanes 3% 19 SB Lane Add at SR-71 Riverside County Line 1.7 1.07 Widen mainline to 6 lanes 2% Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Cost Estimation Methodology • Deficient se g m e nts we re reviewed to determine project limits/ logical termini for mitigation project concepts • Mitigation project conceptswere compared to completed and ongoing RCTC program to determine where deficiencies have been/are being mitigated • Conceptual designs were developed using Google desktop research. — All costsand impactsbased on visual analysis — No detailed engineering completed forverification RIVERSIDECOUNTYTRANSPORTATON COMMISSION MF_ETNG, JUNE13, 2018 Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Cost Estimation Methodology • Conceptual costswere developed based on the quantification of construction elements in the conceptual designs • Unit cost values based on Caltrans 2016/2017 Construction Cost Database • Various ancillary and support cost factors, and contingency factor applied RIVERSIDECOUNTYTRANSPORTATON COMMISSION MF_ETNG, JUNE13, 2018 IV Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Conceptual Design Example —1-15 SB Cajalco to Indian Truck 14,u _ 8 RAMP SR OFF RgATP 5 Z 5B 1-75 N9 ". OPP P d 3 4 P AM � !R LEGEND: ROW IMP4CTS 2 RETAINING WALL 4 STRUCTURE 5 RAMP REALIGNMENT jw ...:�I f I . v Y 200' 0 200' 400' 7 STREET IMPROVEMENTS 8 OIGNALIZATIDM 3 WIDENING V ROADWAY EXCAVATION PROJECT ID 07 EXHIBIT 2 OF 3 Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Total Conceptual Cost Estimate RCTC Truck Study and Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Capacity Improvement Project Conceptual Cost Estimate Summary* !p Route Name Oir Beginning End Total Conceptual Project Cost Findings 1 NB SR-79 S Rancho California Rd $36,237,000 Cost reduced by TUMF inclusion of 1-15 at Rancho California Rancho California Rd Winchester Rd 2 Winchester Rd Lane Add south of 1-15/1-215 Split Mitigated by French Valley Parkway Project 3 Clinton Keith Rd Baxter Rd $7,406,000 Cost reduced by TUMF inclusion of 1-15 at Baxter 4 1-15 El Cerrito Rd Ontario Ave Mitigated by 1-15 Tolled Express Lanes (TEL) 5 Norco Dr16th S1 Limonite Ave Mitigated by 1-15 Tolled Express Lanes TEL 6 Cantu Galeano Ranch Rd Limonite Ave Mitigated by 1-15 Tolled Express Lanes (TEL) Limonite Ave Norco Dr16th 7 SB Cajalco Rd Indian Truck Trail $37,825,000 Cost reduced by TUMF inclusion of 1-15 at Temescal Canyon 8 El Cerrito Rd Cajalco Rd $10,408,000 Cost reduced by TUMF inclusion of 1-15 at Cajalco 9 SR-60 EB Rubidoux Blvd Market St $40,234,000 Market St Main St 18 NB Box Springs Rd Central AvelWalkins Dr $26,513,000 Central Ave/Watkins Martin Luther King 10c Martin Luther King Blvd SR-91 $55,081,000 11 1-215 Center St Off -Ramp Riverside County Line/Iowa $42,212,000 Cost reduced by TUMF inclusion of 1-215 at Hi h rove/Center 12 Martin Luther King Jr Sycamore Canyon Rd $13,403,000 13 SB Van Buren Blvd Case Rd $95,365,000 Cost reduced by TUMF inclusion of 1-215 at Perris, Nuevo, Placentia (MCP), Ramona and Harley Knox 14 Riverside County Line Green River Rd Off Ramp Mitigated by SR-91 Express Lane Extension Project Green River Rd off -Ram SR-71 SR-71 Serfas Club Dr Off -Ramp 15 NB Serfas Club Dr Off -Ramp Grand Blvd Rd Off -Ramp Mitigated by SR-91 Express Lane Extension Project 16 Sp-91 On- Ramp from SB-I-15 On Ramp from NB- 1-15 $7,611,000 17 McKinley St Off Ramp Pierce St Mitigated by SR-91 Express Lane Extension Project 18 Pierce St Magnolia St $13,040,000 19 SB Serfas Club Dr Off -Ramp Lane Add at SR-71 Mitigated by SR-91 Express Lane Extension Project Lane Add at SR-71 Riverside County Line/Iowa Sum Total: $385, 335, 000 *Includesauxiliarylane improvements Total Conceptual Cost Estimate: $385,335,000 Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Tota I Logistics Cost Share ROTC Truck Study and Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Capacity Improvement Project Adjusted Conceptual Cost Share Summary 1D Route Name Dir Beginning End Total Conceptual Project Cost Logistics Attributable Share Logistics Cost Share 1 NB SR-79 S Rancho California Rd $36,237,000 0.7% $258,000 Rancho California Rd Winchester Rd 3 1-15 Clinton Keith Rd Baxter Rd $7,406,000 0.3% $19,000 7 SB Cajalco Rd Indian Truck Trail $37,825,000 2.2% $820,000 8 El Cerrito Rd Ca'alco Rd $10,408,000 1.4% $142,000 9 SR-60 EB Rubidoux Blvd Market St $40,234,000 31.8% $12,802,000 Market St Main St 10 Box Springs Rd Central AvelWatklns Dr $26,513,000 30.0% $7,963,000 Central AvejWatkins Martin Luther Kin 10c NB Martin Luther King Blvd SR-91 $55,081,000 13.3% $7,317,000 11 1-215 Center St Off -Ramp Riverside County Line/Iowa $42,212,000 11.8% $4,978,000 12 SB Martin Luther King Jr Sycamore Canyon Rd $13,403,000 57.1% $7,658,000 13 Van Buren Blvd Case Rd $95,365,000 4.4% $4,235,000 16 SR-91 NB On -Ramp from SB- 1-15 On Ramp from NB- 1-15 $7,611,000 7.5% $571,000 18 Pierce St Magnolia St $13,040,000 8.3% $1,078,000 Sum Total: $385,335,000 124% $47,841,000 *Includesauxiliary lane improvements Tota I Log istics ost Sha re: $47,8413000 Logistics and Warehouse Impact Fee for Rverside County Fee Options Logistics Cost Share of Freeway Mitigation Growth in Warehouse SF Gross RoorArea Fee per SF Gross RoorArea 2016 RTP Heavy EDD Employment Duty Truck Model Trend Forecast $47,841,000 37,332,179 $1.28 32,678,262 $1.46 Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Next Steps RIVERSIDECOUNTYTRANSPORTATON COMMISSION MF_ETNG, JUNE13, 2018 Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee Next Steps • Prepare Nexus Study Report • Consider Fee Allocation and Implementation • Present Study Rye su lts RIVERSIDECOUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MF_ETNG, JUNE 13, 2018 AGENDA ITEM 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: 251h Anniversary of Metrolink Service in Riverside County STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file a report on the 251h Anniversary of Metrolink in Riverside County. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: A Look Back to the Origins of Metrolink In addition to being our nation's Flag Day, June 14 also signifies an important historical day in Riverside County's transportation history with the start of Metrolink service on that date in 1993. New train stations in Downtown Riverside and Pedley opened to serve four round-trip trains between Riverside and Downtown Los Angeles with stops in Ontario, Industry, Pomona and Montebello/Commerce. In looking back at the history of Metrolink and service in Riverside County, it is remarkable to note how quickly a brand new commuter service took shape, obtained funding and began service. Riverside County was the first county transportation agency to set aside funding for commuter rail in its first, voter -approved Measure A program in 1988. Then in 1990, California voters approved Propositions 108, 111 and 116, which raised fuel taxes and allocated $3 billion in bond proceeds for rail projects throughout the state. The Legislature, guided by the leadership of Riverside County Senator Robert Presley, approved Senate Bill 1402, which required the county transportation commissions in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties to jointly develop a plan for regional transit services. Shortly thereafter, in August 1991, the Southern California Regional Rail Authority was formed — the first time in California history a Joint Powers Authority was used for a regional passenger rail line. Train service soon launched in 1992 between Los Angeles and San Bernardino and between Ventura and Los Angeles. Eight months later, trains began serving Riverside County along rail right of way owned by Union Pacific Railway (UP). Agenda Item 10 605 The Expansion of Service in Riverside County The agreement with UP and the underlying infrastructure of the Riverside Line is somewhat limited. Today, there are only six round-trip trains alongthe line and further expansion is unlikely. However, the limits of one rail line did not slow commuter rail improvements and service development in Riverside County. The opening of the nation's first suburban to suburban rail service between Riverside and Orange County took place in October 1995 when service began on the Inland Empire -Orange County Line, which includes stops throughout Corona, Riverside, and Orange County. Today this line is the most heavily used in Riverside County with an average of 4,900 daily riders. May 2002 marked the launch of the 91 Line linking Riverside to Los Angeles with intermediate stops in Corona, Fullerton and Norwalk. The 91 Line grew by an additional 24 miles in 2016 to create the 91/Perris Valley Line. Today, there are 64.5 operating miles of Metrolink commuter rail serving Riverside County. In the future, there will be more opportunities to run additional trains on these routes and improve frequencies. Along with additional lines came new train stations. The Commission is unique among transportation agencies in Southern California in that the Commission owns and operates its stations. In most instances, local cities own and operate each separate station. The Commission's ownership enables the agency to provide consistent standards, maintenance and security for the traveling public at every station in the county. Since the opening of our first two stations in Downtown Riverside and Pedley (which has been renamed as Jurupa Valley/Pedley), the county's roster of stations grew to include Riverside -La Sierra and Corona -West in 1995, Corona -North Main in 2002 and Riverside -Hunter Park/UCR, Moreno Valley/March Field, Perris - Downtown and Perris -South added in 2016. Get on Board This Week and Celebrate with us! In order to mark the 25t" anniversary of Metrolink in Riverside County, a number of activities are planned to thank loyal riders and remind residents of the advantages of taking the train. Outreach coordinators will be at various stations this week to help celebrate with coffee and snacks for the riders and a social media campaign is already underway. The Commission is also asking riders to share their Metrolink memories and will offer prizes for the most interesting and compelling stories about taking the train. A number of cities with Metrolink service have also approved or are scheduled to approve proclamations including Perris, Corona and Riverside. Finally, staff will present a short video to the Commission as part of the presentation of this staff report. The video will be the centerpiece of the social media campaign. Agenda Item 10 .1.