HomeMy Public PortalAbout02 February 10, 1999 CommissionCOMM-COMM-00099
RCTC Meeting
February 10, 1999
Page 2
6B. CONSENT CALENDAR - PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE ITEMS.
6B1. PRIORITY RAIL PROJECTS FOR CALIFORNIA STIP AND FEDERAL PROGRAM
Page 6
Overview
The Plans and Programs Committee and staff recommend that the Commission:
11 endorse the priority project lists developed by Metrolink and the Southern California
Intercity Rail Group and actively advocate for STIP funding of the particular rail capital
projects listed above; and, 21 endorse Metrolink's federal funding request as listed in
Attachment III.
652. CMAQ SET ASIDE FOR LNG LOCOMOTIVE Page 16
Overview
The Plans and Programs Committee and staff recommend that the Commission set
aside up to $300,000 of CMAQ funds to cover RCTC's share of costs for
manufacturing a prototype LNG fueled locomotive.
653. MEASURE A SPECIALIZED TRANSIT ALLOCATION TO FAMILY SERVICE
ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY Page 19
Overview
The Plans and Programs Committee and staff recommend that the Commission
approve operating support for two vehicles to Family Service Association until such
time that the Specialized Transit Analysi§'is complete and recommendations are
provided regarding the future service levels for the Jurupa area, and amend the
funding agreement with Family Service Association to include additional Measure A
Specialized Transit funds of $4,375 per month to support the operating cost of this
second vehicle in the Jurupa/Rubidoux area.
654. METROLINK AND RAIL PROGRAM MONTHLY REPORT Page 21
Overview
The Plans and Programs Committee and staff recommend that the Commission receive
and file the Metrolink and Rail Program Monthly Report.
6C. CONSENT CALENDAR - BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE ITEMS
6C1. FORMATION OF AUDIT SUBCOMMITTEE Page 67
Overview
Receive and file, as the Budget and Implementation Committee has appointed
Commissioners John Tavaglione, Alex Clifford, Jim Smedley, and Gregory S. Pettis to
the Audit Subcommittee of the Budget and Implementation Committee to review
Commission audits and to advise on internal controls.
RCTC Meeting
February 10, 1999
Page 3
6C2. FRIENDS OF JEFFERSON HOUSE Page 69
Overview
The Budget and Implementation Committee and staff recommend that the Commission
approve the proposed Increase to the Friends of Jefferson House maintenance contract
for the Commission's commuter rail stations.
6C3. SELECTION OF INVESTMENT ADVISOR Page 71
Overview
Four firms have been selected for the interview process. The Investment Advisor Ad
Hoc Committee composed of Commissioners John Hunt and Tom Mullen interviewed
the four firms. Based on the Investment Advisory Ad Hoc Committee's proposal, the
Budget and Implementation Committee recommend that the Commission select Public
Financial Management, Inc., as the Commission's Investment Advisor.
6C4. INVESTMENT REPORT FOR QUARTER ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1998 Page 72
Overview
The Budget and Implementation Committee and staff recommend that the Commission
receive and file the quarterly investment and cash flow reports as required by state law
and Commission policy.
6C5. MONTHLY COST AND SCHEDULE REPORTS Page 81
Overview
The Budget and Implementation Committee and staff recommend that the Commission
receive and file the monthly cost and schedule report.
6C6. PROGRESS REPORT ON INTERNAL OPERATIONS REVIEW Page 85
Overview
The Budget and Implementation Committee and staff recommend that the Commission
receive and file the progress report on RCTC's internal operations review.
6C7. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND ILTF} PROJECTION Page 88
Overview
The Budget and Implementation Committee and staff recommend that the Commission
approve the apportionments, as noted in the memorandum in the agenda packet, as
Annual Local Transportation Fund apportionment for Coachella Valley, Palo Verde
Valley, and Western Riverside County.
RCTC Meeting
February 10, 1999
Page 4
7. 1998 STIP AMENDMENT $15 MILLION EL NINO, REHABILITATION & ARTERIAL PROGRAM Page 90
10 MINUTES
Overview
The Plans and Programs Committee, Technical Advisory Committee and staff recommend that the
Commission eliminate the El Nino storm damage category from the $ 15 million call for projects and
approve the list of arterial and rehabilitative projects for STIP funding.
8. 1998 STATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AMENDMENT Page 95 10 MINUTES
Overview
The Plans and Programs Committee and staff recommend that the Commission: 1) Program the entire
amount of discretionary 1998 STIP amendment funds and the entire Western County formula share of
1998 STIP Amendment funds as listed; 2) Consider any programming recommendations coming from
the January 25, 1998 CVAG Executive Committee meeting for the Coachella and Palo Verde Valleys'
formula share of 1998 STIP Amendment funds; 2) Should no recommendation be forwarded from
CVAG, then staff recommends the Commission reserve the respective Coachella and Palo Verde
Valleys' formula shares of 1998 STIP Amendment funds for their future programming
recommendations; 4) Combine the $1.007M of 1998 STIP Amendment Planning, Programming &
Monitoring funds with the $1.376M of previously programmed 1998 STIP funds to make programming
recommendations for these planning funds consistent with the Commission's direction to allocate the
funds in accordance with the adopted Intra-County Formula for allocating shares of STIP funds.
9. CONTRACTS/AGREEMENTS FOR CETAP Page 98 10 MINUTES
Overview
Recommendations for contracts/agreements for CETAP projects will be presented to the Commission
for approval.
10. 1998 AUDIT RESULTS Page 100 10 MINUTES
Overview
Ernst & Young, LLP will make an oral presentation on fiscal year 97/98 fiscal audit. It is recommended
that: 1) The Commission receive and file the report and the management letter from the auditors; and
2) Staff provide quarterly reports to the Board on any jurisdictions indicated by the auditors as going
concerns (i.e., questionable financial condition).
11. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT NO. RO-9932 TO CONSTRUCT A PEDESTRIAN
OVERCROSSING STRUCTURE AND SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS AT THE EXISTING LA SIERRA AND
WEST CORONA METROLINK COMMUTER RAIL STATIONS Page 132 5 MINUTES
Overview
At the October 8, 1998 meeting, the Commission directed staff to advertise to receive bids for the
construction of a Pedestrian Overcrossing Structure and Security Enhancements at the existing La Sierra
and West Corona Commuter Rail Stations. A recommendation will be presented to the Commission at
the meeting.
RCTC Meeting
February 10, 1999
Page 5
12. LOCAL SALES TAX MEASURE RENEWAL OPTIONS Page 134 10 MINUTES
Overview
The Budget and Implementation Committee recommend pursuit of a reduction in the current vote
required for passage of focal transportation sales tax measures.
13. DRAFT WORK PLAN FOR THE STRATEGIC PLAN Page 136 10 MINUTES
Overview
The Budget and Implementation Committee and staff recommend that the Commission approve the draft
work plan for completion of the Commission's comprehensive and countywide Strategic Plan. The
Strategic Plan will address all major funding sources including sales tax, state and federal funding,
possibility of developer fees and any other viable sources of revenue.
14. REGIONAL AIRPORT EXPANSION ISSUES AND OPTIONS Page 146 15 MINUTES
Overview
A presentation will be made on the regional airport expansion issues and options. The Plans and Programs
Committee and staff recommend that the Commission consider the adoption of Resolution No. 99-01,
Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Calling For A Regional Airport Plan for
Southern California.
15. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
16. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND COMMISSIONERS REPORTS
Overview
10 MINUTES
This item provides the opportunity for the Executive Director and Commissioners to report on
transportation related meetings, conferences/workshops, etc.
17. ADJOURNMENT
The next meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission is scheduled to be held on
Wednesday, March 10, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. at the University of California Chancellor's Conference
Room.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MINUTES
January 13, 1999
1. CALL TO ORDER.
Chairman Bob Buster called the meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission to order
at 9:00 a.m. at the UCR Chancellors Conference Room, 1201 University Avenue, Suite 207,
Riverside, California 92507. Self introductions followed of those present followed Isee attached
attendance sheet).
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT COMMISSIONERS ABSENT
Eugene Bourbonnais
Bob Buster
Percy Byrd
John Chlebnik
Alex Clifford
Frank Hall
John Hunt
Dick Kelly
William Kleindienst•
Al Landers
Jan Leja •
Stan Lisiewicz
Tom Mullen
Kevin Pape
John Pena
Gregory Pettis
Andrea Puga
Robin Reeser Lowe
Ron Roberts
Doug Sherman
Chris Silva
Jim Smedley
John Tavaglione
Jack van Haaster
Jim Venable
Frank West
Don Yokaitis
Robert Crain
Roy Wilson
•Arrived after start of meeting
At this time, Commissioner Jim Venable informed the Chair and submitted a letter from Commissioner
Roy Wilson indicating that in his absence, Commissioner Venable will vote for him.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS.
There were no comments from the public.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - December 9, 1998.
M/S/C Mullen/van Haaster) approve the minutes dated December 9, 1998 as submitted.
RCTC Minutes
January 13, 1999
Page 2
4. PRESENTATION ON SACRAMENTO ACTIVITIES
D.J. Smith, RCTC's Sacramento lobbyist, briefed the Commissioners on changes in Sacramento. This
is the first democratic administration on the executive side in sixteen years there is an incredible
education orientation taking place. Appointment of the Transportation Committee in the Senate and
the Assembly were made. Of all the members of those two committees, 60% of the membership
have never served in the legislature or been on the committees previously. Both Policy Committee
Chairmen have not chaired the committee before, they were both on Assembly Transit and Senate
Transit in past years. He noted that there will be a total of five out of nine seats on the California
Transportation Commission that will be appointed by the Governor. Some of the upcoming legislation
on transportation include: 1) a Project Delivery Bill to be offered by the Chairman of the Assembly
Transportation Committee. Currently, there are $1.6 billion is in the State Highway Account not
being utilized. The bill would expedite project delivery and free up highway account cash by
instituting a State Highway Account Loan Program, which would allow local agencies with cash flow
to borrow funds for up to four years at the STIP escalation rate minus 1 % which will be very
attractive and advance shelf and environmental ready projects. Local agencies must have cash flow
in order to utilize this as there will be some penalties if local agencies are unable to make payments.
In order to qualify, a local agency does not have to be a self-help county, it could be a locality
building an interchange with available developer fees, redevelopment or any number of other local
sources; 2) to consider extension of local option sales tax. Eighteen counties have local option sales
tax and with the exception of Los Angeles County which does not have a sunset division, all of the
other counties' measures sunset over the next ten years; 3) the Governor, Senator John Burton talked
about developing a Transportation infrastructure Task Force, similar to Governor Deukmejian's 10 year
blueprint, called Proposition 111, which doubled the gas tax on transportation improvement
program. Unfortunately, well over half of the funding was spent on earthquake retrofit, not
transportation improvements.
Commissioner Alex Clifford asked what is D.J.'s assessment, the coming year or years relative to
the north and south conflict (the Governor appointing San Francisco Mayor Brown's candidate for
Caltrans Director).
D.J. commented that Mayor Brown's issues are for Transbay Terminal out of downtown San
Francisco to Treasure Island and retrofitting the Bay Bridge. To accommodate his issues would cost
several hundred million dollars. The statute did not neaotiate a dollar cap on the Bay Bridae retrofit
but rather the basic desian of the bridge would be split between the Highway Department and the
toll revenues (the tolls doubled as a part of that compromise). Any additional work would need to
be paid by toll. Bay Area residents will continue to pay double tolls longer if they add bicycle paths,
add a light rail train, etc.
In response to Commissioner Jim Smedley's question on the length of loans under the State Highway
Loan Program and whether funds are tied in any way to the $1.6 billion, D.J. stated the loan would
be no more than four years. D.J. explained that a minimum of $300 million must be kept in the State
Highway Account to pay cash flow needs. The total amount limited is one half of a billion dollars.
Eric Haley, Executive Director, added that the loans are secured by revenues of the Commission
through the State Transportation Improvement Programing process, that is why it's a four year time
frame. An RCTC project for the loan program would be the Route 74 project. Local projects would
be secured by other sources of revenue, but RCTC is the responsible fiscal body paying back the
debt. The Commission need to recognize that what is being committed for the loan program is its
future revenues. If a default occurs on the payment, all the outstanding principal and interest plus
RCTC Minutes
January 13, 1999
Page 3
a penalty of 5% will be assessed against your county on the STIP the next time out. He noted that
the proposal was created in the Inland Empire.
Eric Haley noted that the Quarterly Reports distributed to the Commission included a number of charts
and some data from the Self Help Counties Associations regarding the sales tax issue. The California
Transportation Commission has embraced both the sales tax extension issue and loans.
•
On behalf of the Commission, Chairman Bob Buster thanked D.J. Smith for the presentation on
Sacramento activities.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL ITEMS
5A1. Election of Officers.
At this time, Chairman Buster expressed his gratitude to serve as the Commission's Chairman
for the last two years where a number of changes and important issues took place. He
iterated that the Commission need to concentrate in transportation efforts in areas that will
help the greater number of the residents to have local jobs. There is a need to collect and
develop data on the number of our residents job commuting to other counties for jobs. He
sees that as one of RCTC's main challenge and priority.
Commissioner Tom Mullen stated that the a city commissioner and county commissioner
rotate on the Chair and Vice Chair position. He raised a proposal whereby city commissioners
elect the city officer and the county commissioners elect the county officer.
It was determined by the membership that this be addressed at a later time.
M/S/C lRoberts/ReeserLowei to nominate•.pommissioner Jack van Haaster for
Chairman.
Commissioner Jack van Haaster was elected as Chairman by a vote of 21 ayes, and
4 nays. Four commissioners were not present.
Commissioner van Haaster then assumed the Chair.
M/S/C (Puga/ReeserLowe) to nominate Tom Mullen as Vice Chairman.
Commissioner Mullen was unanimously elected as RCTC's Vice Chairman.
5A2. RCTC Executive Committee Appointment.
Eric Haley stated that the Executive Committee is comprised of the Chair, a representative
from the Cities of Riverside, Corona and Moreno Valley, a representative from the Cities of
Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Norco, Perris,
San Jacinto and Temecula, a representative from the Cities of Blythe, Cathedral City,
Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, Indian Wells, Indio, La Quinta, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, and
Rancho Mirage, andthree representatives from the Board of Supervisors. The Board of
Supervisors has appointed Commissioners Tom Mullen, John Tavaglione, and Jim Venable to
the Executive Committee.
RCTC Minutes
January 13, 1999
Page 4
The Commission adjourned for five minutes to allow the groups to select their representatives.
The meeting resumed and Chairman van Haaster announced that the Executive Committee
is composed of the Chair and Commissioners Alex Clifford; Ron Roberts, Dick Kelly, Tom
Mullen, John Tavaglione, and Jim Venable.
Chairman van Haaster took the opportunity to thank Commissioner Bob Buster for the
wonderful job that he has done as Chair for two years especially his efforts during the
transitional year and at a time when there were a number of tough issues that had to be
negotiated.
5A3. RCTC Representation and Appointment/Reappointment to Various Agency Boards and
Committees.
The following appointments were made by the Chair:
Southern California Regional Rail Authority (Clifford, Kleindienst, Roberts -Alt, Puga-Alt)
High Speed Rail Ad Hoc Task Force (Clifford, Roberts, Puga, Landers, Venable, Bourbonnais,
Silva)
Southern California Intercity Rail (Clifford, Kleindienst-Alt)
Regional Transp Agencies Consortium (Mullen)
Riverside Transportation Financing Authority (Mullen, Pape)
SCAG Regional Council (Lowe)
Mobile Source Review Committee (Kleindienst, West -Alt)
SCAG Transportation & Communications Committee (Lowe, Pettis -Alt)
Toll Road Ad Hoc Committee (Buster, Clifford, Hall, Kelly, Mullen, Puga, Roberts, Tavaglione)
Four Corners Policy Coordination Group (Tavaglione, Smedley, Landers)
Investment Advisor Ad Hoc (Mullen, Hunt, Kleindienst)
Local Government & Small Business Advisory (Chlebnik)
5A4. Upcoming 1999 Conferences/Workshops.
M/S/C (Pettis/Kelly) approve to approve Conference list as amended.
5A5. Call for Projects for El Nino, Rehabilitation and Arterial Improvement Program.
Hideo Sugita, Director of Planning and Programming, informed the Commissioners that
January 8th at 5:00 p.m. was the deadline for submittal of projects for the $15 million Call
for Projects. Eighteen local agencies submitted a total of 44 projects, with a total value of
approximately $129 million. The projects will be reviewed this afternoon.
5A6. Executive Director/Commissioners Report.
Eric Haley reported on the following: 1) A movement in some corners to delay the State
Transportation Improvement Program because of new appointments of Cabinet Secretary and
Caltrans Director. The movement in the administration to delay could go beyond sixty to
ninety days and bump ,us into next year. He requested Commission approval to strongly
advocate a continuance of the regional program so that we can take a look at the $94 million
worth of projects, make those decisions and then move forward the $30 million plus for the
larger Measure "A" programs. Unless there was objection he would follow that forward. It
RCTC Minutes
January 13, 1999
Page 5
would override local policies that have already been implemented and the decision making
processes that are well on their way. It also helps balloon the cash balance that is a drag on
the system; 2) Discussion by Commissioner John Tavaglione and staff with San Bernardino
regarding Sierra inter -county corridor - connections east -west between the growing Fontana,
Rialto, Ontario area and West Riverside, Glen Avon, Pedley. The study area was defined and
includes Sierra Avenue, Pirite and Mulberry, a major thoroughfare in San Bernardino County.
SANBAG, with the City of Fontana, has committed to finance half of the study effort which
is a year term study completed by June, not to exceed $100,000 will provide the basis for
a new corridor decision. No construction funds are committed at this point. He requested
direction on whether to move forward as we are at a point where a scope of work could be
negotiated.
Commissioner Robin Reeser Lowe stated that with regards to the movement to delay the
STIP, she and Commissioner Dick Kelly were in Sacramento last week. The cities that were
present from the League also voiced concern about the delay.
M/S/C (MullenNenable) to authorize Commissioner John Tavaglione and the Executive
Director to move forward on the Riverside/San Bernardino intercounty corridor.
Eric Haley continued his report and said that RCTC was successful in gaining initial planning
money through the PSR (Project Study Report) on the Colton Crossing in the Colton area.
This is a flyover that eliminates the service level conflict between BNSF and UP railroads as
they go through Colton. This project would also resolve several issues involving rail
congestion as well as continuing problems through the City of Riverside and Colton. Additional
funds are needed. Under the MetroLink Advocacy Program, $5 million is requested from the
State for engineering and design work.
Commissioner Buster asked if it would be appropriate,to have a subcommittee to deal with
the Colton Crossing issue.
M/S/C (Mullen/Buster) to appoint Commissioners Clifford, Mullen, Puga, Leja, and
Buster to the Colton CrossingSubcommittee.
Eric Haley reported on a meeting of the Ad Hoc Route 91 Toll Road Committee
(Commissioners Kelly, Clifford, Puga, van Haaster, Tavaglione, Mullen, Buster) held with
OCTA and NewTrak yesterday. Representatives of NewTrak are hoping to acquire the 91 Toll
facility. He noted that Jim Guthrie, one of NewT►ak's Directors is present today. RCTC
presented its view of the history and dysfunction of the state/CPTC (California Private
Transportation Company) and explained its position on the franchise and its inability to make
improvements Route 91 for its commuters as follows: 1) status quo acceptance - which gives
RCTC no standing in any of the decision making bodies that govern this toll road and waiting
32 years until the franchise ends; 2) re-engage a legislative and legal challenge to the toll
facility, which is a long shot and very expensive; 3) purchase the toll road in conjunction with
an Orange County agency or agencies through a joint powers authority which will provide
control but the downside is considerable liability and is opposed by the Orange County
Transportation Authority as they do not want to be in the business of operating a toll road;
and, 4) proposal by NewTrak to acquire the franchise. The key issue facing NewTrak is
financing but with a non-profit status, they can save between 300-400 basis points in their
financing. If that was to happen, they feel there will be some net available revenue, net
available revenue gain by the lower financing against the tolls that are paid which could be
RCTC Minutes
January 13, 1999
Page 6
a substantial amount of funds. NewTrak is requesting RCTC's support for the non-profit
status. The proposal is that RCTC draft a letter supporting non-profit status consideration to
the IRS indicating that there is a public benefit in moving from the current environment to a
non-profit operation of the toll road. By doing so, NewTrak has committed that upon
completing the transaction, their first action will be to lift any tolls on the 3 + HOVs which
will benefit a number of Riverside County residents. NewTrak will give RCTC advanced
notification of any transaction that takes place and this is extremely important because RCTC
has no fall back positions. Another important issue is a creation of a capital improvement
projects committee which will deal with the disposition of the available revenues. NewTrak
proposed that the Committee consist of two commissioners each from RCTC and OCTA, and
two NewTrak Directors of which one would be a resident of Riverside County and one in
Orange County. The proposal would be to use funds to improve and identify connectors
connecting Route 71 with the toll lanes, providing direct connection between the toll lanes
and the new eastern corridor, increasing MetroLink service in the corridor. Any
recommendation should clearly indicate that we are not endorsing the ultimate deal, but
commit in writing that there is a perceived public benefit changing the ownership from what
it is today to what it would be and to move forward in the next two weeks to wrap up a
description and bring it back to the Commission on how the capital improvement committee
would work and define excess revenues. The recommendation from Ad Hoc Committee was
to endorse the tax exempt status request, holding open all of the rest of RCTC's options,
to publicly acknowledge the offer of the lifting the tolls for 3 + HOVs and the creation of an
investment committee.
Commissioner Buster stated that these are all verbal promises, nothing in writing, and there
are no assurances especially when there are changes in the composition of the group in the
future. However, the proposal is much better than with CPTC. There are no information on
what is being paid as premium for the toll road, estimate of funds leftover for other projects,
etc.
In response to Commissioner Lowe's question relating to the financial status of CPTC, Eric
Haley said that it is difficult to determine if they are financially hemorrhaging. Payments are
being made and they have a significant investment in the facility. It appears that much of this
is motivated by a change of business interest in one of the major corporations and that is the
pressure to make the deal. There is also a risk that at the current interest rate environment
they could refinance their junk bonds at least at a couple hundred basis point less, and if they
went out we would simply have nothing. He noted that OCTA, in this particular
circumstance, has a common interest with RCTC. They would be the joint beneficiaries of
any excess revenues that came out of the process. The profits from this non-profit would go
into that Capital Improvement Committee. Their interest is in maximizing the amount of
funds. In this case, this is not an OCTA/RCTC conflict in any way.
In response to Commissioner Jim Smedley's statement that this is such an important item but
it would seem that it deserves to be agendized for a discussion by the Commission rather than
as part of the Executive Director's report, Eric Haley indicated that the meeting was held
yesterday and was uncertain as to the outcome of the meeting.
Commissioner Kevin Pape iterated the need to have additional information from NewTrak as
it is difficult to make a determination with having those facts.
RCTC Minutes
January 13, 1999
Page 7
Commissioner Andrea Puga stated that at the Ad Hoc meeting, there was a lot of hesitation
about the perception. Information such as financial reports were not available but it is a good
idea, we need to move forward and get started. She was convinced that NewTrak were very
honest and straight forward.
Commissioner John Chlebnik stated that in an application for tax exempt status, an
organization has to submit its bylaws and budget.
Steve DeBaun stated that he has reviewed NewTrak's bylaws and, at this point, they are
basic. Our approach has been to draft changes to the bylaws which would incorporate the
deal points discussed such as free for 3 + HOVs, the excess revenues or profits available for
the county projects and the like. A copy of their budget was not provided although he thinks
that there is not much associated with it because they do not have the numbers. But that is
something we can ask for.
Commissioner Percy Byrd asked what are the consequences if RCTC decides that it cannot
support the proposal and Eric Haley explained that RCTC do not went to operate it, own it
or want any liability from it. We want to improve our current circumstance. It would be good
to have an agreement, with the deal points that have been previously discussed.
Commissioner John Tavaglione stated that he participated in the meeting and, as Supervisor
Buster mentioned , the toll road as it stands today would appear to be a project that has
failed. However, there is no proof of that. As it stands today, RCTC and OCTA have no say
in what happens on that road. Commuters of both Riverside and Orange Counties are
impacted. The proposal is grey, but it does provide RCTC some say in what occurs. if we
let this relationship continue, or if there are no relationship between the two counties and
CPTC, the problems in both counties will continue to get worse. He sees this as an
opportunity and the only option for exploratory purposes at this point. He supports the non-
profit status.
Commissioner Alex Clifford stated that conceptually the idea of a non-profit taking over the
operation is a good concept. He has every bit of confidence of what the NewTrak members
had indicated that they intend to fulfill. But that confidence needs to be boosted by in
writing. He is not comfortable going forward with a proposal endorsing non-profit status
simply because. If RCTC signs a letter agreeing to a non-profit status, and once they obtain
non-profit status they are an entity in their own right. They will no longer have to deal with
RCTC and there will be nothing in writing to mandate that the deal points. My argument for
needing something in writing to feel comfortable going forward is really based on historical
perspective. He had every bit of confidence in 1989-91 that Orange County was going to
fulfill their promise in providing free flow through this bottleneck. It was a promise that they
made to their voters in their measure, that confidence wasn't justified. As we found out later
on, Orange County decided their priorities were elsewhere. They decided to resolve that
commuter bottleneck issue, by putting a toll road into place. Back in 1991, RCTC was faced
with a dilemma whether to file a lawsuit to stop the toll road from taking place or sit on the
sideline. On a very narrow vote, it was decided that a lawsuit would have been a long action
and probably not prevail. And maybe the best thing to do was to sign a Memorandum of
Understanding to try to come to an agreement. RCTC had ail the confidence that CPTC
would fulfill the things that they showed in their franchise agreement with Caltrans. They
decided to eliminate the intermediate access points which made this a Riverside County toll
road. RCTC filed a suit and it lost. He has raised this only to elevate your conscience on the
RCTC Minutes
January 13, 1999
Page 8
issue of getting the deal points in writing. By just stating the things that we think will benefit
Riverside/Orange County. Maybe more importantly what will the CPTC profit be. If the
ultimate proposal is to use tax exempt financing and buy out CPTC we are potentially using
tax exempt money to provide a profit to CPTC. Once a non-profit status is obtained, they are
on their own to decide what that profit will be. RCTC needs to be in a position to say that
is unreasonable, what is wrong expenditure of public financing or what is reasonable.
Otherwise the proposal potentially endorsed today could come back and haunt us as an
endorsement of this transfer proposal.
Jim Guthrie, NewTrak Director, stated that for them to get involved was very simple. CPTC
has a 35 year contract and debt service with a fairly high interest rate. NewTrak will come
in to refinance at 300-500 basis points cheaper. He believes that they have reached their
break-even point for the first time in the franchise. By lowering the debt payment, NewTrak
has the ability to generate excess funds. They are trying to negotiate something that the do
not even know what they are negotiating because they do not have a dollar figure. They have
a group of people that are in for the benefit of the corridor rather than for the benefit of a
profit. They are trying to figure out what the price would be, what the excess revenue would
be and will probably not know until another five or six months. Their projections were made
purely on projections - they have apparently been getting closer to meeting those projections.
The price will be based on real numbers. NewTrak has two problems, one is the perception
that CPTC will walk away with somewhere about $75-$100 million profit. They met with
FasTrak and told them that is not going to happen. They are willing to sit down and look at
what we feel is reasonable. The other thing that they are finding out the problem between
Orange and Riverside Counties and they think this goes a long way to bringing the two bodies
together to mutually benefit both counties by supporting their non-profit status. He has had
30 years history of public service and would like to take this and make it into a better
situation.
Commissioner Dick Kelly stated that he sees this as an opportunity to build a better
relationship with the bordering county. He reiterated his concern about the inability to use
the Route 91 tollroad without a FasTrak card and should be like the Eastern Corridor tollroad
where users could either use a card or pay in cash. He agreed to move ahead and write the
letter of support for the non-profit status for NewTrak.
Commissioner Will Kleindienst expressed that, at the Commission, most of the work will be
done at committee levels. The current Ad Hoc Committee of nine members dealt with this
issue yesterday and he has heard the Executive Director's report with the recommendation
of that committee. He cautioned the Commissioners that if every issue that comes before
this Commission is taken apart, as was done with this issue, and not speak to the
recommendation of the committee, RCTC will find itself at a pointwhere it cannot continue.
He suggested that the Commission address the Committee's recommendation and any
amendment to the recommendation. What is being done now is taking apart the entire issue
and if there is not a confidence in its Committee structure at the first meeting, RCTC will find
it will move through the process very slowly. The recommendation is quite clear and he
appreciated the amendment regarding the bylaws. He suggest that the Commissioners come
to closure on this.
RCTC Minutes
January 13, 1999
Page 9
M/S/C (Puga/Mullen) to authorize the Route 91 Ad Hoc Committee, working with the
Executive Director and Legal Counsel, to negotiate on the deaf points and after
receiving full assurance, send a letter of support to IRS for a non-profit status for
NewTrak.
The motion passed with 21 ayes and 6 nays. There were two Commissioners absent.
6. TRANSIT/RIDESHARE/BICYCLE
6A 1. Transit Operator Productivity Improvement Program and Short Range Transit Plan Process.
M/SIC fMullen/Tavaaiionel to approve the Proposed Transit Operator
Productivity improvement Program and Short Transit Plan Process as
presented
7. HIGHWAYS/LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS.
M/S/C (Mullen/Kleindienstl to award the Design Contract No. Contract No. RO-9957
for the Final PS&E Design of the Route 74 Hiohwav Improvement Proiect. between
I-15 and Wasson Canyon Road near the Citv of Lake Elsinore to S.C. Enaineerina for
a base amount of $798.391 with a continaencv of uo to $101.609 (1390. for a total
not to exceed amount of $900,000 using the RCTC model consultant agreement and
reviewed by Legal Counsel.
8. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters of the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single
motion unless a Commission member requests separate action on specific items.
M/S/C (Kleindienst/Landers) approve the Consent Calendar.
8A. Consent Calendar - Administrative/Financial Items.
8A1. Clarification of RCTC's Per Diem Requirements and Approval of Ordinance No.
99-01, An Ordinance Amending the Administrative Code for the Riverside
County Transportation Commission Relating to Compensation of Members of
the Commission.
1) Receive and file Legal Counsel's memorandum clarifying the Commission
per diem requirements; and, 2) Approve Ordinance No. 99-01, An Ordinance
Amending the Administrative Code for the Riverside County Transportation
Commission Relating to Compensation of Members of the Commission.
8A2. CVAG and WRCOG 1998-99 Work Programs Supported with RCTC Local
Transportation Planning Funds.
Approve the attached FY 1998-99 transportation planning work programs for
both CVAG and WRCOG, and approve the allocation of $127,295 of FY
1998-99 Local Transportation Funds to CVAG and $270,000 of FY 1998-99
Local Transportation Funds to WRCOG.
RCTC Minutes
January 13, 1999
Page 10
8A3. Amendment to FY 1999-2003 Measure "A" Five -Year Capital Improvement
Plan for the City of Temecula.
Approve the amendment to the FY 1999-2003 Measure "A" Five -Year Capital
Improvement Plan for the City of Temecula as submitted.
8A4. Single Signature Authority Report.
Receive and file.
8A5. State and Federal Legislative Programs FY 1999-2000
Approve the Final Draft of the FY 1999-2000 State and Federal Legislative
Programs.
8A6. Monthly Cost and Schedule Reports.
Receive and file.
8A7. Y2K Quarterly Status.
Receive and file.
8A8. Deadline Extension for Completion of TDA Audits.
Grant Ernst & Young a 90 day extension to complete the TDA and Measure
A audits.
8B. Trensit/Rideshare/Bicycle.
8B1. Allocation of Measure A Specialized Transit Funds for Family Service
Association of Western Riverside County
Allocate an additional S8,750 in Western County Measure A Specialized
Transit funds to Family Service Association of Western Riverside County to
support the cost of operating a second vehicle in January and February 1999
and amend our funding agreement accordingly.
862. Transportation Specialist, Inc. - Request for Measure A Western County
Specialized Transit Capital Matching Funds
Approve the request from Transportation Specialist, Inc. that the required
20% match 072,640) be funded from Measure A Specialized Transit funds.
8B3. 1998 California Rideshare Week in the Inland Empire
Receive and file.
8C.-Highways/Local Streets and Roads.
RCTC Minutes
January 13, 1999
Page 11
8C1. Award of Construction Contract No. RO-9928 for a Park and Ride Lot in
Moreno Valley near Pigeon Pass/Frederick Street and Route 60
1) Award Contract No. RO-9928, for Construction of the Pigeon Pass
Park and Ride Lot, to E.A. Mendoza for the amount of $304,513.00.
Staff also recommends that a contingency $20,487.00 be authorized
to cover potential change orders encountered during construction for
a total contract value not to exceed $325,000.00.
2) Approve an overall budget adjustment of $87,030. to cover the
previously approved funds for final design, environmental mitigation
and now to include construction for this project. Total cost of the
Project will now equal $402,030. The amount allocated and
approved in the Fiscal 1999 budget totals $315,000.
8C2. Award of Construction Contract No. RO-9933 for Landscaping Project on
State Route 91 from Van Buren to Mary Street
Award Contract No. RO-9933, to construct the Route 91 Landscape Project
(Van Buren to Mary Street), in the City of Riverside and Riverside County, to
Diversified Landscape Co., for the amount of $595,841.00. Staff also
recommends that a contingency $29,159.00 be authorized to cover potential
change orders encountered during construction for a total contract value not
to exceed $625,000.O0.
8D. Rail.
8D1. Rail Program Update.
Receive and file.
8E. SAFE
8E1. Amendments to Communications Site Leases between the County of Riverside
and the Riverside County Service Authority for Freeways Emergencies (RC
SAFE) and Subleases between the RC SAFE and Lodestar Towers California,
Inc.
11 Approve the amendments to communication site leases between the
County of Riverside and the Riverside County Service Authority for
Freeway Emergencies pending legal counsel review, and
2) Approve the amendments to communication site subleases between
the Riverside County Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies and
Lodestar Towers California, Inc. pending legal counsel review.
At this time, Chairman van Haaster reviewed the membership of the Plans and Programs Committee
and the Budget and Implementation Committee.
M/S/C )Landers/Pena) to endorse the Committee membership as outlined by the Chair.
RCTC Minutes
January 13, 1999
Page 12
9. CLOSED SESSION
9A. Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation Pursuant to Section
54956.9{b} - 2 Claims
9A1. Schoenhofer vs. Riverside County Transportation Commission
No action was taken. Correspondence was not received within six months
after the event or occurrence as required by law.
9A2. Request by Caltrans for RCTC to Defend in the Davison vs. Caltrans, et al.
That RCTC accept tender of defense.
10. ADJOURNMENT
The next meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission is scheduled to be held
on Wednesday, March 10, 1999, at 9:00 a.m.
espectfully submitted,
Naty Kt penhaver
Clerk of the Board
was
e460b-c/,E di76/ �' rlos-7-ehe
°/L
°sPJ-s_5, - bP.4
/. -5,4r (7>‘
9i/ z-v- 6N- 09z
c 6 / "�L� 9�L
L 2t0- r2g--0V / z''Lo-nLi -07G
I s 67 L - bob
74h-re "S6i.: E"jt 416
/ Gpa1_SS�
«Q•�� Qjz/1t9�--a�
924c-'- Z "e6 c? 7+ /S— ~ ZZh
9z&7-469 / zhGn--Lz9
I Olp/_TS'�
/
41"...C.0+61r.4:411 .vs ref fj
1131111E11N X I/ 3NOHd3'I3,L
Q„€2 '-1`1-4111•1Z
1 eiygiO Ay
hi_ c7 V -7*p.-i—_te
✓s.gki i 7 0/ hit ,7
r �cyr
v °1 (7
ti. •t•v. v J 1.
"�k " fr
or47Zi
A3N39V
pagnbar jou sr 2uprAy
�11,14r�' �l -irvY"V4)
C.1 J4'2. %/ / 7,2,
v'
"`e)'r`7'yeoir
S'�1 9.fu57,
sli, y.+/704.717 ]NtEn.27
- (1 - 7,+J N N(f'
-4 -77/ �y
w,z44-64,w) :1/i1 .
f y�� 1,// 4vrr7
MANN
NOISSIww00
3H1 30 >Ia310 3H1 01 Qat/O ANOW11S31 V _LimnS CINV 3131d1A100
3SV3-1d 'NOISSIWW00 3141 01 S1N31,110100 301/10ad 01 HSIM noA 31
NI NJIS 3SV31d
'W'V 00:6
666 t 'EL AldVntkPir 'AVOS3NCI3M
LOSZ6 aPp�amEI ,LOZ a�mg 'anuany,tiisaaniun 10Z4
16100li 30N31:133N00 SA10113ONVHO
301S83A1EI 'VINa031ZVO 30 AlIS1:13AINf1
NO/SSIWWOO NOIL VLY0dSNWLL AI NnOO 3015113/1 /d
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1999
SIGN -IN SHEET (Page 2)
IF YOU WISH TO PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, PLEASE COMPLETE AND
SUBMIT A TESTIMONY CARD TO THE CLERK OF THE COMMISSION
NAME
Jc4-ti A
9%r2a c/k NA 4 L
A L
J O Cj
/'/. -rt-
o ..s 7\ oarliTs
S-4-011 i S;42a-IICE
.�� ak
Signing is not required
AGENCY
C ITY 0 Losc Nrri1/4
c /Ty of /41/(E E1Si cbR�
C / r4' evr- Ne eco
PecRt 15 _
.Lrt.� Dim Sr- nJ .74e
i 7 6F / &,7 E Cc/44
Oa /1-ran S.
'Ds
TELEPHONE /FAX NUMBER
-M-7000 / 777--7)01
lv7Y T/a9 /
#$//3 3 cc 6
/
73 S-o1./9D
96/c_ 9.2/ 2-
- 2, 3
iy -6 yyo
383 - Hass
it.cyl)la'3
— CO f
l bS21 Zz'
095-4
l 383 - 6.2 39
/1 313 '81oi
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
NAME
�- // 4-/TA �g
D i c .L DC I -€:
o f1 ti p,
�L
Y. a
PLALV2 C-6 6,A ir...1
tRr
5U5Qin
(rMcr it
k //Awt M4/672,
711erlsl4- 72Pv,ao
Signing is not required
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
CHANCELLOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
1201 University Avenue, Suite 207, Riverside 92507
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1999
9:00 A.M.
SIGN -IN SHEET
AGENCY TELEPHONE /FAX NUMBER
6 e-e--- /4-4-7c_9.0 S-7$7-75's f/ 70 S- 75') 7 5 z c
Cc, I-.\--t-yk 5 9C°().- -lb -2,--41`'7/ 9c,) -3f 3 -4 .
C ,
K( C
Rc c c_
LITR oP
CALF i2.,AN.15
�C�7G
/
/
f i
kAwcr3 613 7 — 9 73 / / 97/-00 6/
3463 i l 3'63 - 7 13�4-
2eT-0,
Z�
� ,
S L.' Lie �GteliSt' ÷-
SvNc I, v.."" T
ALAn, 2-,t
1
/
ORLI-0659 I Cgs 100
Sr9-72?-1 3sz/ 709- 72711-3 71.S_'
C00-34f 3-1 4 s6/ r762::)- 3 co_WItcs-
7d o- 3(8-3 9fG / no -Xi 051f
�0--.571-e9_U / 6Sc) -57I-egg0
i `11 -SC... (17- 6 (7y,.,r l `'1 0 r'L j 34=.41- 771'3 �. L
909'g74-70?6'3 /
741 _ �Z7 / -te n
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 13, 1999
SIGN -IN SHEET (Page 2)
NAME
n ICK C4/,r61-
—72)/G ' J 7)
Laced
4:/-2M C.w 7-4
caosA-A1 Soet!
LL 1jA`?Na
,l
,t t-ret..
r
/"! 0/cz.:2 Lie/ 6-4
Signing is not required
AGENCY
/2v. mod.
C I1,1+..7rEtTt. Va r 1 e
C r ? Y 0A it
TELEPHONE /FAX NUMBER
ref- .74-d I -3/ 5'6
`Po9) 574, I
?e C
9 69 -781-SSGO
cic - /-��51
:1),(. #744_ aw44nok f 57-934
iew-c-, 4 O+
th41'.,eA o_,
G RTt-N Mt. P.`0`
GtT`Z
CO cr
tiiLL
ft�c,cc
grin r
QC 7c.
if
707- 794 / /
ii
909-76/- 06 y0 / Co cs Co -
g 09 787-792P/ -7p 7- 79 zo
760/-770 - p36a
5'6s/7 9 -7S fr 7g1L/
t,5, s-/ (VH - /). r
/
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
February 10, 1999
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Executive Committee
Eric Haley, Executive Director
Proposal to Change the Budget and Implementation Committee
Meeting Time from 3:00 P.M. to 2:30 P.M.
The Commission's Budget and Implementation Committee meets on the fourth
Monday of each month at 3:00 p.m. The Coachella Valley Associated Governments'
(CVAG) Executive Board meeting is scheduled on the last Monday of each month at
6:00 p.m. Commissioners who are members of the Budget and Implementation
Committee and the CVAG Executive Board do not have sufficient time to travel from
Riverside to Palm Desert and arrive on time for the CVAG Executive Board meeting.
To remedy the problem, it is recommended that the Budget and Implementation
Committee meeting time be scheduled one half hour earlier ( at 2:30 p.m.). By doing
so, the Commission's Plans and Programs Committee meeting (that meets on the
same day starting at 12 Noon) must be completed by 2:15 p.m. and staff does not
see this as a problem.
The attached Ordinance No. 99-02 will amend the Administrative Code to reflect the
change in the Budget and Implementation Committee meeting time.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDA LION.•
That the Commission approve Ordinance No. 99-02, Ordinance of the Riverside
County Transportation Commission Amending the Administrative Code.
nk
(Hi 00O;.
ORDINANCE NO. 99-02
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION'S
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
WHEREAS, by Ordinance 93-003, the Riverside County Transportation Commission
has enacted Administrative Code; and
WHEREAS, by Ordinance Nos. 94-001, 94-002, 95-001, 95-002, 98-002, and
99-01, the Riverside County Transportation Commission has amended its Administrative
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Commission has determined that it is now necessary to amend
again its Administrative Code to change the time in which the Budget and Implementation
Committee meetings are to be held.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Riverside County Transportation Commission hereby
ordains as follows:
Section 1: Article III, Section H(1)(a) of the Administrative Code is hereby amended
to read as follows:
1. The following Committees of the Commission are hereby created:
(a) The Budget and Implementation Committee: This Committee shall be
composed of fourteen regular members of the Commission selected by the
Chair to provide adequate representation from the western and desert areas
of the County. Subject to supervision by the Commission, the jurisdiction
of the Committee shall be as follows: annual budget development and
oversight; countywide strategic plan; legislation; Measure implementation
and capital programs; public communications and outreach programs;
competitve grant programs; TEA 21 (CMAQ & STP); and other areas as may
be prescribed by the Commission. Meetings shall be held at 2:30 p.m. on
the fourth Monday of the month at the offices of the Commission, unless
otherwise determined by the Committee or the Commission.
UUO00
Section 2: This ordinance shall be effective on February 10, 1999.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February, 1999.
ATTEST:
Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Jack F. van Haaster, Chairman
Riverside County Transportation Commission
000003
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
February 10, 1999
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Executive Committee
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Proposal Not to Schedule An RCTC Meeting in August
There are a number of local agencies in Riverside County that do not schedule
meetings during the month of August. The purpose for RCTC staff recommending
going dark in August is threefold: 1) Commissioners who plan on a vacation in
August will not miss a Commission meeting; 2) It allows staff to take vacation time;
and, 2) It allows staff to catch up on their work. The Commission, by not having a
meeting on August 1 1 t, will not schedule a meeting of the Plans/Programs and
Budget/Implementation Committees on July 26t. If the Commission approves the
proposal, staff will review and adjust their schedule so that agenda items are
presented to the appropriate Committee without affecting any of its programs and
projects.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission approve the proposal to cancel RCTC's Committee meetings
on July 26 and the Commission meeting in August 11.
nk
UUOOU4
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
TO:
February 10, 1999
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Executive Committee
Eric Haley, Executive Director
Authority for Executive Director to Budget $10,000 for Casual
Employees for FY 1998/99
The Commission's Personnel Policies and Procedures, approved December 9, 1998,
included a Casual Employee Category. This is to allow the Executive Director to hire
casual employees in a variety of job categories to fill short term jobs, to manage
periods of heavy workload, to cover transitional periods caused by a position
vacancy or to assist in special train events. Casual employees are employees who
work in a non -budgeted position on an as needed basis, generally for less than six
months (not more than 1039 hours for the year) and who are paid an hourly rate.
When hiring a casual employee, the duties of the position, hours worked, rate of pay,
and the expected period of employment will be made clear. Benefits eligibility for
casuals is limited, as appropriate, to state mandated benefits, such as workers'
compensation. A casual employee's employment does not carry with it the guarantee
of a full week's work and is not deemed to have continuity of service with RCTC.
Casual employees applying for a regular position will be required to go through the
recruitment process.
I would like to propose that the Commission authorize the Executive Director to
budget $10,000 for the remainder of the FY 98-99.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
To authorize the Executive Director to budget $10,000 to hire casual employees to
assist with staff workload.
nk
U0000
uu5
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON
DATE:
TO:
February 10, 1999
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Plans and Programs Committee
Susan Cornelison, Rail Program Manager
THROUGH:
Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Priority Rail Projects for California STIP and Federal Program
Background:
With the anticipated amendment, or augmentation, to the 1998 State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP), the five Metrolink county partners and the seven county
agencies which comprise the Intercity Rail Group have studied needs and developed
lists of the most critical rail capital projects needed for system growth, reliability and
coordination of services. The lists in Attachments I and II reflect the priorities
adopted by each of those two governing boards, for inclusion in the State's
Interregional Program of rail projects.
Staff is recommending that the Commission endorse these priority lists. And, as
RCTC has particular interest in three of the projects listed, staff further recommends
that the Commission actively advocate for STIP funding of the following:
- Track Improvements at Bandini (located in L.A. County; system wide benefit).
- Metrolink Rolling Stock (system wide benefit).
•
- Colton Junction (located in San Bernardino Co.; benefit to Inland Empire Line).
The Metrolink Board has also adopted a list of projects for which it will seek federal
funding and is asking RCTC's endorsement of this list as well. (See attachment 1111
PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission:
1) Endorse the priority project lists developed by Metrolink and the
Southern California Intercity Rail Group and actively advocate for STIP
funding of the particular rail capital projects listed above; and
2) Recommend RCTC's endorsement of Metrolink's federal funding request
as listed in Attachment III.
UUO006
C
G
CD 11 Tn. Fta171r
� M.dr M ECIIRKO IdihNlNlak OWjedo
C AMMO t4 a nO KdQ�uinikniMobak ��TNaiad aboinrrov 00^d�onnoNSF.
1T Pgva eM bawd MCA, Fall vn
W Fhb irk Y w d0/'ddid T11pv b klvMid
1� Th wild A / it dal TW M Q �� yiQinF MAI` u** Pord MO ATA YH Rni� v F: bed w l use 000 two kndo MYM 4 peddhi FkM xO In ydKwM ��ti„� . MKOW duel M odd'F/� NN In On I/MIE 1M� Erd E wdiM Tio oddNe d 11 0lYr� o F Far ^� edi�•
dddWe7 Or0.17011Ho1 yreoa FroavaT) lbws unwed. or he 4of r von 1: n B n11r b iTnFh.
Attachment I
SCRRA INTERREGION PROJECTS
PROPOSED FOR THE 1998 STIP AMENDMENT - REVISED 12/9/93
The first sin seven projects in SCRRA proposed list for funding in the 1998 STIP
Amendment total $2.1434 S28.555 million. These are the projects staff recommends for
endorsement by the Member Agencies.
It should be noted that for all the projects listed below, in some way, benefit accrues net
only to the line on which the project is located, but to the entire Metrolink system. Each
Metrolink equipment set does not remain on one line, but during each day is cycled
through to other lines. Thus, in increasing flexibility and reliability on one line, the
project will also benefit all other Metrolink lines. In addition for example, projects
located north of Los Angeles, such as a new crossover, will not only benefit Amtrak and
Metrolink service north of Los Angeles, but will improve service south of Los Angeles,
as a late train north of Los Angeles will not be able to maintain its schedule going south.
1. Three Miles Of?riole Track At Banta' 57.08 million
This project is located in the City of Commerce and would build three miles of triple
track between Fullerton and Los Angeles Union Station at Bandiai starting at the
currently proposed end of BNSF four track main line. It will provide an
improvement which is essential if Metrolink and Amtrak are to increase the number
of trans running in this corridor. The project total cost is S12 million: a 15% .
contribution is assumed from BNSF and a 2S% contribution from Amtrak. The
project is located on the LOSSAN Corridor between San Diego and Los Angeles.
This corridor is the second busiest in the United States. it is also located on
Metrolink's Riverside to Los Angeles via Fullerton Line which is proposed to open
FY 2002/03. This section of the corridor is very active: each day there are 21 Amtrak
Intercity trains, 22 commuter rail trips and over 41 freight trips. Metrolink ridership
on the Orange County Line has grown to over 5,000 daily trips. The corridor is now
entirely owned by public agencies accept the 2S-mile section between downtown Los
Angeles and Fullerton. This segment of the corridor is owned by the Burlington
Northern -Santa Fe Railroad
Each Metrolink equipment set does not remain on one line, but duringeach day is
cycled through to other lines. Thus, in increasing flexibility and reliability on the
Orange County and Riverside to Los Angeles via Fullerton lines, the project will also
benefit all other Metrolink lines. The project will also benefit Amuck service not
only between San Diego and Los Angeles. but also north of Los Angeles, since a late
Amtrak train south of Los Angeles cannot maintain its schedule north of Los Angeles
to Santa Barbara or San Luis Obispo. Lastly. the project will benefit BNSF since it
will permit better control of freight train movements as they go into and out of the
Alameda Corridor which will soon be under construction.
000308
Attachment I
2. Ingie Crossover tretween Vans Nuvuinigsvmq S.75 miIIion
This project would provide a single crossover between the Van Nuys Station and CP
Raymsr, 2 miles west of the Van Nuys Station on the Ventura Line. This segment is
double track, but there is currently only a full length passenger platform on one track
and there is nowhere for trails to cross from one track to the other and allow trains to
pass near the station. The project will increase flexibility and reliability for commuter,
Amtrak Intercity and freight trains using this corridor since Men+oiink dispatchers will
be able to move UP freight traffic in and ottt of UP's GEMCO Yard and still maintain
a high level of passenger rail traffic. Through this section of the corridor, there are 10
Amtrak Intercity trains, 18 commuter rail trips and over 12 freight trips daily. The
project total cost is S 1 million and a 25% contribution from Amtrak is assumed.
3 e Ti V $L6 million
This project will provide for new and/or upgraded passenger rail ticket vending
machines (TVMs) at Metrolink and Amtrak stations. The project benefits the entire
Metrolink system, Amtrak Intercity service and has the potential to benefit other
transit providers in the region. These new machines will be able to vend either
Metrolink. Amtrak, and Coaster errs, The machines will also have the potential to
sell bus tickets. This means that fewer total capital costs for ticketing machines are
needed and servicing costs are lowered and mod.
The new machines will be able to vend different types of tickets. For example, they
will not only vend tickets for a regular one-way, round-trip, 10-trip, or monthly pass
for adult, student, handicapped, or off-peak {are, they will also allow someone to bury
a ticket for a future dote and several different types of tickets at once. They will vend
interline tickets and be able to allocate the money collected to the different operators.
For example, a person will be able to buy a single ticker allowing the user to travel
from Riverside using Metrolink, then transfer to Amtrak to Santa Barbara, then return
home —and do this so that both Metrolink and Armtek get their share of the ticket
price. Similarly, commuters could purchase joint Metrolink and Coaster tickets
transferring at Oceanside. This makes the entire passenger rail network in Southern
California much more useable to many. many more travelers.
Finally, the SB 457 study on ways to save operating costs in the Sea Diegan Corridor
determined that one of the most productive cost saving measures is to introduce
TVMs for intercity Rail passengers, Savings come about by eliminating, over
and as worlcead out with the union, time,
least the number of hours an agent needs to be is at lesser -used Amtrak stations, or at
stations on the Sari D' present. � addition, almost Half of the
staticticketto be cBan route are =staffed and the machines would allow Amtrak
Purchased at these stations or when stations are closed.
000009
oToonn
- quasi a ur iulsm° uoslo, arg yana np 2sossad suts u t say yadusije pup sumo
or sl y yuryoflahr `suts4 or ado saw 4in tum4 ;noels nu .i.S E 17sa9 41W
a uo djpua an, sun uotiallnd + saAlW so?-apprattig ay1 uo aopuas uoppairp
Pad aiwyrjoW Alipua aurl (d111:P a+R tro4Ppdiro puv 4111gmlu asaa cni!
IIiM =ra id aril 'MA tyJlsujdR pnv.dSlifg o1 aCIPlaP aawpu /1fM uouomidas
spud ay1 aouls' tempo ul vary puao, ammo ay; q gtaai
ofni a+9rt fo Amur sn OM 4w/00 ammo a a u yl s� sums
arll rnl asp uo a9 o sla ll� ogwpdas :pals
a
adaa asaaCur pup sap), ovum pinom uonvattfas apaas pus
?unsor, uoiloo srp ignoir: soave am. Om) *woo dump of &whirl pualul
ayl vaPt as 9ulloaapy aojosla m4 'su7714 Plabiflort juo jou visual:Ng snows
s sasuoaaq" so' apsanlp 8y1 bsazolg W sph►WI= VAT Jrla!N"SV suogrus
apisaanrg pus ou/pfaung uaS saul14749111 uasnyaq uogo, to mug utsur da
pup ism. asp fo augsata app4Iys Sump, aq1 auundas appf3 peons sacra ni sryl
uorjrlur 000`SS uoupluslt
S pp1+J aulsra. uoslo,S -g
• •• :pawns= sr ittutud way uopagtuuoa °i6SZ it pas aotrrtto
I S sr uoa mat iaafosd Jq L -Asp sdnx uptar3 ZI saAo pus alp rrsr sJrnaurov 8 i
•sareu krusutr'moon, Ol as SAM 8101:11I10o Jq3;o uozarn snR tgnagl• �Sraltrral
lidos bL paw gglq :pp sit &moss= aQ3 ass of ansq tap supra /atoms! Isztuv
pus =IMMO* 01 s aides atop =opal A1legautsgns !um situ, 'qdo 09 do Spuds
Moat pinoA 3o2(01d opsl9dn aq3 pas qdm ;pp spas ssga?q p+oiis Room ssanossaa
utauraandar sqz `qda 0£3o mods 10; Ao11p =Koss= :sauna aq1 •oatn.AS
URA o3 siosdurt aznantrto mm poQ3ay uou:nusa= sue, sago pro Jqr;o matuaruar
asopq =was mur mat; ft:RIO pus wpm! law= mitt, Taos rsn(sanosso:3
;o Ulf Maus 8unonusuoo;o swum rip* Isom atu vullos'go ant sputum patI s �
pas mo tuoA ars slnauodsoo rya aq3 pus 896 r tst avid ompnoS x6 Aq 1r!ng swa
SrPlzolsnel stgl •srsv3rs pus Srazsoa Aaa tgrA pus =Ix= A,au TYat pater us uolld
do is =AMOS* saAod atp aaerdar up* =road Nuys au -soots is Ip sanossosa
Srgr;o uaurasardat aqi paparg N,LNt LOPE ar m" uMAI lsude0 6646 A.4 Jqr ul
00t1111r S1.1 qaul 09 a3 uuirfr' dJ is lanosstuo apeman 'S
'B assgd in saz 9 03 S pntompps us Stquanbar asa Jm
=pro aq3 or sir L PPs mom pus uorscrrrdds ruse mum =unto aq3 Ut paps aq
mom =so I asegd aq3 zap p0turturs Tr 31 saspgd onu am grit =CI SRI 21171rtj JNIS
sir uorrrna.rim sou uaabar MO MT= ppaontpps so;.peon It AUNT ptrsmap dpisrapp
Jo suopaa(osd IttO 1143 ZZ-IZ por anpoutaavr oral JO; Mgparr; harps JAM'
am. 'mad VMS loud s TVA pasmtsoa aatt& loos aagfOs A= so; span; Tampa; ur
u01111m S£S PRI" "Ai AnnIJS `aus 8661 aq3 III lumuc uba AauP 1"1 °R: �
pauplosuoa aq Q.m gsmOsB sue; `IaAamori -mu aArssstdusr as is Ao18 or pant:woa
sag dtgsaptl s,1ml0431,5i 1661 Jagulau101+1 m 00V/ Z rJno parr= spq dnlstpu
A sp:Strand' 'sup" 511 Pus SaAQotu000l ££}o =Fur=MU Jra?T" V3210S aril
nu II!a SI I C
1luaLLITZ llf
1 amid -21001S au111021 VIluzaW lIIuMPPd •b
TT0000
.:mosso si 19-1311TV
grog aoongimuoo %st a pow rzs zoo Imo: =afosd au. App sdrn tg8rsg
Z I sono pay sdsrt Haar =num= g Y 'salon 6tt»uI 3p:or y of a= gram 'ropuroa
=R3o uouzas Tit g8nozca "loPfuoa 7q4 2anrt =gut 211294 pay Annual xe tEni
•ramaomoo so; aug sgiz go hgnorpar pal Afi4on tea? sgu, .smart saSuassad
Aq Pam aCt ffuTPTu =II urn CZ sari= 31MaH mug° rum saqMW raP+od aqt qtu„
SuuTu AIM** 2811o4s PaPPI TRI.1101101Vtis mod PPR Puy 0001 of 000`b am;
urn smivaA uo waQmH t: S !pig woo Sow= am pea= prom% ixford spa
00r![lut SL8P 91001 dJ dt KPH lS 311rPFS-0800 Puoixg Y
811rprrnfagj vs amdr>Pmd pit d!I Puir.dSIVg
au, ivy; Papadra stir Psi,: vo IMI iSS sr is= Mold mug aql vomoalrp gam
-ova uv to asrnswo ow ghouls 1Vssad sip OF Cato svy d!! Pry veri u?P Wier
I I 0 0 0 0
•ratunssw /Extuxv
tuot; uoungmaoa %g a pas stomp SZS quo: pun =fold atu Mrs" sdta igprsg
ZI MAD pas sdpt gat snrtstttuoa S I 'salsa 6l1:3nta1 I faxtu y 0I we malt 'sopvsoa
241;o isouxa s?q1 Omuta 0P!stoa aqs 5a!sg sum 3g2P4 Pas Aluiglul
'satnastuoo 103 purI TR; Ito S ?Il ps pal Lumen sum spu 'satsst m9a2ssed
L4 Pam gq Pug lurPls gq; asn of =Fa VW;140I14 ITS ggq:ITmg =mud stp tau„
SuoTs gumbo alums papm frgi %' oqopAss =mod pp paw za*3 0001 at 000`b tutu;
van atnsuon aqt tto quggsrier 2trms Isito'J Zap s>o asp Pam from tzefosd spu
0111rul SL8' IS P t{3Ioo'I dJ of Vg4mH 111 aulP!S isao0 Pwtx� Y
lug:am ay: nr aux#Mind urns da Pry iSNir
asp JayJ pawadia a Jr;no wawa nis "s07 pafold;ma aql 1101pa ►p xrdm
$JDa ort: sr! Isn sw asp 'hoop hrrssvd s upw OF "40 MN eta Pup sorJaanp slings
rroposed SLIP Amendment List
January 8,1999
Page 2
BACKGROUND:
The California Transportation Commission (CTC) is in t project evaluation criteria guidelines and process of setting interim
Transportation lmprov and establishing a fundestimatefora 3998 State
January I4, to adopt this item. din (S �' The CTC is meeting �.
As part of your adopted SCIItG FY '99
consultants to begin scope of work, you directed staff and
preparation of a capital
Subsequent
that action, the CTC k programming der for the corridor.
.AmeT� �t was the need to developconsidering a 1998 STIP
draft capital program is prepared b staff, � SCIItG project � �� � initial
Y ,the TAC and LSTS, your cent.
The TAC met a number of times to drat a list of A!I member agencies projects for the Board's tndorsem�,
rell me r participated and considerable
g (attached), staff and TAC believes is areasonable� was � The
Amendment funds.reasonablerequest for STIP
Si345 identified a minimum of what is ,.
projects in the State. B �� � "2.25 % level for intercity rail
nature, not regional ( Because rail carriers, such as Metro
CTC broadened therefore not ��'� for designated�are 'interregional" in
� dcfinitian to ' regional funds), the
" 4 C " level. Because of the substantial
and in the '98
interregional needs stantial north/south STD, sealed and on a
that "4 � � needs for intercity projects and �
inter eg real million � level t to be maimained for the STIP Amendment
Sacramento and m million
Y approved for track and signaln
kton should not count again this ,.4 % level. �s between
The TAC with the c
significant non -state oration of Amtrak, local agencies and railroads funds for many of these preys. Staff identified significant action and should be believes that this .
allocates fonds for the STIP A� as well given wit when �,C
The Board is � to �� �
significant coordination a list for submission to the
efforts m corms of agencies , Meru on the
CTC to adopt the "4 � *level of
g and �-Sffite
Stockton project from the level
. funding and exclude the $12.3 million and urge the
advocacy actions needed to ensure � priority Tbe and fibers Should ffiioe those
Attachmentis .
UU0013
��t s r r , R a w l s
A T T A C H M E N T 2
t
'