HomeMy Public PortalAbout01 January 10, 2001 CommissionCOMM-COMM-00101
Riverside County Transportation Commission
January 10, 2001
Page 2
7B. CONTRACTS COST AND SCHEDULE REPORT Page 2
O vervie w
This item is to receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Report for the
month ending November 30, 2000.
7C. CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE/SOCIAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION
ADVISORY COMMITTEE Page 6
Overview
A list of candidates and their terms of office in CAC/SSTAC is presented to the
Commission for appointment.
7D. SCHEDULE OF CONFERENCES/MEETINGS FOR 2001. Page 11
Overview
A list of conferences/meetings for 2001 is presented. Staff proposes up to
two Commissioners be approved to attend a conference/meeting, as is provided
for in the RCTC budget and in accordance to the Commission's approved Policy
on Attendance of Conferences/Meetings.
7E. CETAP UPDATE
O vervie w
Page 13
This item, for receive and file, will provide an update on CETAP Internal
Corridors, Inter -County Corridors, Transit Integration and Funding.
7F. AMENDMENT TO FY 00/01 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FOR THE CITY OF
CORONA Page 15
Overview
This item is to approve the amendment of the City of Corona's FY 01 Short
Range Transit Plan and allocation of $55,000 in Local Transportation Funds to
be used for the 2 0 % local match for construction of a slow -fill CNG refueling
station.
Riverside County Transportation Commission
January 10, 2001
Page 3
7G. PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY'S TRANSIT AND PARATRANS1T MANAGEMENT
CERTIFICATE PROGRAM Page 17
O vervie w
This item is to approve the allocation of up to $8,975 of Measure "A"
Specialized Transit funds to support non-profit operator located in Western
Riverside County to attend the Pepperdine University's Transit and Paratransit
Management Certificate Program.
7H. AGREEMENT FOR DISSOLUTION OF SCIRG Page 24
Overview
This item is to approve to dissolve the joint exercise of powers agreement for
the Southern California Intercity Rail Group (SCIRG)•
71. AWARD CONTRACT NO. RO-2128 TO STV INCORPORATED FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT PHASE ENGINEERING SERVICES RELATED TO THE SAN
JACINTO BRANCH LINE Page 29
O vervie w
That the Commission: 1) Award Contract No. RO-2128 for an amount of
$166,187 and 10% contingency of $16,613 for a total amount of $182,800
for Phase I to STV Incorporated for the development phase of engineering
services related to the San Jacinto Branch Line in Riverside County between
the cities of Riverside and Perris. A scope and cost for the next phase
projected, Phase II - Preliminary Engineering, will be negotiated with STV
Incorporated at a future time and will be brought back to the Commission for
review and approval; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal
Counsel review, to execute the contract on behalf of the Commission.
7J. AMENDMENT #2 TO CONTRACT NO. RO-2028 WITH POUNTNEY &
ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE PROPOSED VAN BUREN METROLINK
COMMUTER RAIL STATION. Page 37
Overview
That the Commission approve: 1) Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. RO-2028
with Pountney & Associates, Inc., which would allow the Commission to
delegate extra work authority, within Commission approved funding limits, to
the Executive Director, as long as the extra work was within the overall scope
of the original contract. The exact language for the federally -funded contract
extra work clause will be developed by Legal Counsel; 2) The attached Extra
Riverside County Transportation Commission
January 10, 2001
Page 4
Work Request/Change Order No. 1 as part of Amendment No. 2. The available
Extra Work funds will be used to compensate Pountney & Associates for the
additional work provided for the Change Order No. 1. The cost of the Change
Order No. 1 is $50,948.06; 3) The use of the extra work clause within the
overall scope of the original contract, developed by Legal Counsel, for use in
all future RCTC federally funded contracts or amendments to existing RCTC
federally funded contracts; and, 4) Authorization of the Chairman, pursuant to
Legal Counsel review, to execute Amendment No. 2 on behalf of the
Commission.
7K. AMENDMENT #12 TO CONTRACT RO-9337 WITH THE COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE TO PROVIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVICES FOR THE ACQUISITION
OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
SOUND WALL #36 Page 57
O vervie w
This item is to approve: 1) Amendment #12 to Contract RO-9337, with the
County of Riverside to provide right-of-way services for the acquisition of
temporary construction easements, required to allow for the construction of
Sound Wall #36, on the south side of Route 91, between Harrison Street and
Myers Street, in the City of Riverside, for a base work amount of $120,300
with an extra work amount of $19,700 for a total not to exceed amount of
$140,000. A standard amendment will be used of this agreement; and, 2)
Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel review, to execute
Amendment No. #12 on behalf of the Commission.
7L. STATE ROUTE 79 PROJECT RESCOPING TO CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL
INVESTIGATIONS ALONG THE CONCEPTUAL REALIGNMENT ALTERNATIVES
NEAR THE CITIES OF HEMET AND SAN JACINTO BETWEEN RAMONA
EXPRESSWAY AND DOMENIGONI PARKWAY Page 64
Overview
This item is to: Approve Amendment #1 to Contract No. RO-9961 to CH2M-
Hill to conduct environmental investigations requested by the Resource
Agencies during a meeting held on September 28, 2000. The additional cost
is $109,450 to perform the environmental investigations. Included as part of
Amendment #1 will be to add $40,000 of extra work and direction to RCTC
Legal Counsel to add contract language that will permit the authorization of the
extra work under written direction of the Executive Director; and, 2) Authorize
the Chairman to sign Amendment #1 to Agreement RO-9961 using a standard
Consultant amendment form, subject to RCTC Legal Counsel review.
Riverside County Transportation Commission
January 10, 2001
Page 5
8. MID YEAR REVENUE PROJECTIONS 5 Minutes
Page 73
O vervie w
The mid -year revenue projections and planning budget adjustment to reflect the LTF
planning revenue and expenditures are presented for approval.
9. AMENDMENT TO FY 00/01 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FOR COMMUTER RAIL
5 Minutes
Overview Page 76
This item is to approve the amendment of the Commuter Rail FY 01 Short Range
Transit Plan and to allocate $2,508,600 in Federal Section 5307 funds to provide the
match for the purchase of seven additional Metrolink cars.
10. AWARD OF VEGETATION REMOVAL CONTRACT FOR STATE ROUTE 74
REALIGNMENT 2 Minutes
Page 81
11.
O vervie w
This item is to award the vegetation removal contract for State Route 74 realignment.
A final staff report will be presented at the Commission meeting.
PROPOSED GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001-2002 BUDGET
15 Minutes
Overview Page 83
Presented for approval are the proposed goals and objectives for Fiscal Year 2001-
2002 budget.
12. DRAFT 2001 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN (RTP)
Overview
15 Minutes
Page 83
The Draft 2001 RTP was recently released by SCAG for public comment. This plan
is from years 2001 through 2005. This item is for the Commission to receive the
report.
13. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA
14. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT 5 Minutes
Riverside County Transportation Commission
January 10, 2001
Page 6
15. CLOSED SESSION
Conference with Real Property Negotiator Pursuant to Section 54946.8
Negotiating Parties: RCTC - Executive Director or Designee
Property Owners: See following list for property owners.
SR 74 Right of Way Acquisitions
1
349-090-009
Joseph Saline, Jr.
2
349-090-011
Kevin Valles, Tr.
3
349-090-004
Armin Altemus
4
349-100-032
William A. Lovell
5
349-100-035
Paul Olshefsky, et ux.
6
349-100-004
Jeffstra, Inc.
7
349-100-038
Dao Hoa
8
349-100-037
Arturo Mendoza, et al
9
No APN
See Parcel Identified As 13593-1
(Attachment 1)
Winifred D. Baird
10
349-060-009
James A. Gonzalez
11
No APN
See Parcel Identified As 13592-1
(Attachment 2)
Leslie L. and Jane M. Cameron
12
349-100-001
M.V. Duffy James
13
349-400-001
Frank Anzaldi, et al
16. ADJOURNMENT
The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00 a.m., Wednesday,
February 14, 2001, at the University of California @ Riverside, Chancellor's
Conference Room, 1201 University Avenue, Riverside, California.
AN •C ' 01 15:.-37
-ww1
�s
r,
I
SCALE: 11 1000
E'LY LINE ROAD E or
PER R/S 24/77 i "g UTION
PER !HST. 10. T' 9 Oa R.
RECORDED la. 6, I98T
ri S 2-4177
w 14, SEC. 21
T.55., R.4W., S.a.M.
PARCEL 28
�
Sri' L'r 1 RE OF 3 WV..�L�/ ri� ��
NO. ' 033933, 1.9. I 3, 0� � 1
RE"ORCED
4AY 24. ]979
SHEET 10c !
PARCEL 26
011
,�t. Eo
116rttS 4�
� ?R"k
17113
'HE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED s
ON THE CAL{FORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF I983, a
TO OBTAINuGRO D DISTANCES
EVEL DIS SHOWN BY .00O40548
7.4
lik 3311 EAST SFiEL$Y STREET ON'ARIO, CA 41764
TEL 90% 91C-1982 FT Aka ',9D9) 941-0691
Associated Enpheere, Inc.
AREA
DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE KILOPOST
C8 RIVERSIDE 74 2T.9/32.0
PARCEL NW 13593-1
SQUARE FEET: 573
SQUARE NETER& 512."4
PARCEL 13693-1
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY
4,0. LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ATTACHMENT
SHEET I OF I
SCALE: I : I SOO
PARCEL 2
114
0
20 21
29 28
PARCEL MAP y0, 1 r4064
PM8 T9/66
PARCEL 3
SUPERSEDED 4314111AT.
vACATED DT CALIFORMA
NOWAY COIYSSION
RESOLUTOI A 532.
RECOROED I-24-T7,
INST. NO.12339. aR
S'LY LNE PARCEL
YAP 140.14064.
P1! 79/K
D •45. 0Z'7
RE ` r- tR
PARCEL 4
p 5:c*�/
�,- P'a.05� 14
.7�*ZE7
N'LY LlllE OF Doe EDE IMOIAY
CONVEYED TO 11C STAN OF CALFOIOH
PER DOCUIENT RECORDED 1-11-T4 AS
MST. NO.144255. aR IL FOOL ORDER OF
COICEHNATION RECOPIED HI -TT AS
PIST. NO.1J7i4, OR
SECTION 29
T. 5 S., R. 4 W., S. S. M.
R.S.
it/4'
SST' 47'49" R
441.146 N
16/5
Z
0
6
1zCC
c.1
tad
N
A
-cron
_ 9.144 m
{301
T
S
i
i
i
\
S4. 33.406itg
EAST LSE OF
SEC.29
THE BE.ARNCS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE BASED
ON THE CALFORNIA COORONATE SYSTEM OF 1983.
TO0��E SY LOOQIOOT9
O9 GROUND LEVU DST SHOWN
Associated Engineers, Inc.
331 EAST MAY STREET ONTARIO. CA 91764 PARCEL Nd,l � �
TEL.!�1 49011960^1!12 FAxt i!O!1 as
AREA
DISTRICT C01MTT ROUTE IILOPOST
SOWN FEET. 4T.306
OR RIVERSIDE TA 2T.9/32.0 1 Sawn Ions 4.324.3
PARCEL 13592-1
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EXHIBITS PAGE:.„ ATTACHMENT
PUBLIC
COMMENTS:
AGENDA ITEM r S)
Detach and submit to Clerk of the Board
BJECT OF
LIC COMMENTS:
74) P 17 u s
AND SUBJECT(S):
NAME: t ,c4 Il, y 'f'
k14 %�i 1 DATE01/ P Q /
ADDRESS: 76 A PYI 5tTEL. NO: C - 3 /
REPRESENTING: Air � A r
BUSINESS
ADDRESS: TEL. NO: l4-j
ROTC 7/99
Detach and submit to Clerk of the Board
PUBLIC s
COMMENTS:
SUBJECT OF I
PUBLIC COMMENTS: �j�i�' LjA
AGENDA ITEM NOIS)
AND SUBJECT(S):
ADDRESS:
ko-. DATE: l /6)__
o' �n�`/
n
��`vr1(/ (r.ti' Mill lir PI 1 T�L1.1`NO:7:, 1`�S_ ( S' /2,
REPRESENTING:9 C�1 r "(,r 1;0 (.(,q -Ofq. '' � y __/ '
1
BUSINESS
ADDRESS: �1-",'t
RCTC 7/99
TEL. NO:: Iry (6) v' /tr.(
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MINUTES
December 13, 2000
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Tom Mullen called the meeting of the Riverside County Transportation
Commission to order at 9:05 a.m. at the University of California, Chancellor's
Conference Room, 1201 University Avenue, Riverside, California 92507. The Chair
welcomed the newly appointed Commissioners to RCTC.
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent
Daryl Busch
Bob Buster
Percy L. Byrd
Juan M. DeLara *
Frank Hall
John Hunt
Dick Kelly
William G. Kleindienst
Stan Lisiewicz
Ameal Moore
Tom Mullen
Kevin W. Pape
John J. Pena
Gregory S. Pettis
Robin ReeserLowe
Ron Roberts
Janice Rudman
Greg Ruppert
Gregory V. Schook
Phil Stack
John F. Tavaglione
Al "Bill" Trembly
Placid° Valdivia
James A. Venable
Frank West
Patrick Williams
Mike Wilson
Roy Wilson
* Arrived after start of meeting.
Robert Crain
Jack F. van Haaster
RCTC Meeting Minutes
December 13, 2000
Page 2
3. PRESENTATIONS
On behalf of the Commission, Chairman Mullen and Commissioner Jim Venable
presented a plaque to Eugene Bourbonnais in recognition of the service served as a
member of the of the Commission. The Commission also had plaques for Andrea Puga
and John Clebnik and it will be forwarded to them.
Commissioner Bourbonnais expressed his sincere appreciation for the time spent as a
member of the Commission. He added that he is available to speak on behalf of the
Commission on the need to extend the measure.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Garry Grant, Meadowbrook, expressed his concern that by not including the Van Buren
alignment in CETAP may impact Route 74.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MISIC [Kleindienst/Hunt] to approve the minutes of the December 13, 2000
meeting.
Abstain: Byrd, Rudman, Trembly, Valdivia
6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS.
None.
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7A. ROUTE 74 FINDING OF NECESSITY AND APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 00-020
"RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY TO ACQUIRE FEE AND EASEMENT INTERESTS
IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
BY EMINENT DOMAIN, IS NECESSARY FOR THE REALIGNMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT OF STATE ROUTE 74, BETWEEN DEXTER AVENUE TO
WASSON CANYON ROAD (SEGMENT 1r
At this time, Chairman Mullen opened the public hearing.
Steve DeBaun, Legal Counsel, The purpose of this item is for the Commission to
conduct a hearing to consider approval of the proposed Resolution of Necessity,
make the findings that the public interest and necessity require the proposed
project, the project is planned or located in a manner that will be most compatible
with the greatest public good and the least private injury, the fee and easement
RCTC Meeting Minutes
December 13, 2000
Page 3
interests to be acquired are necessary for the project; and, the offers of just
compensation have been made to the property owners.
Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director, briefly described the project. He
indicated that the staff report describing the project and the required findings,
which is a part of the record, was provided to each Commissioner prior to the
hearing. This is a realignment project from Dexter Avenue in Lake Elsinore to 7"'
Street in Perris and will be constructed in two segments, There is time
constraints on the project because the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in their
biological opinion for the project, required that gnatcatcher habitat within the
proposed right-of-way be removed outside of the gnatcatcher breeding season,
which is March 15 to August 31, to avoid disruption of its breeding and nesting
activities. The offers for the parcels requiring vegetation removal were approved
by the Commission at its November 8, 2000 meeting.
Hideo Sugita continued and said that the County of Riverside Real Property
Department is under contract to the Commission as its right-of-way agent for this
project. RCTC's offers for just compensation for the purchase of the 41 parcels
and its offer to purchase the parcels for an amount not less than the approved
appraisal of the fair market value of the properties were mailed to the property
owners, as required by law.
In response to Commissioner Bob Buster's question as to whether any of the
property needed was improved, Hideo Sugita stated that the property needed
was clear land.
Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the Board, informed the Commission that proofs of
mailing to property owners for the notice of hearing are available and on file. She
stated that no written objections, protests, and requests to speak for today's
public hearing were received.
Hearing or seeing no one wishing to present testimony, the public hearing was
closed by Chairman Mullen.
MISIC (Pape/Williams) to:
1) Make the following findings as hereinafter described in the staff
report:
lit The public interest and necessity require the proposed
project.
(ii) The project is planned or located in a manner that will be
most compatible with the greatest public good and the least
private injury.
RCTC Meeting Minutes
December 13, 2000
Page 4
OM The fee and easement interests to be acquired are
necessary for the project.
(iv The offers of just compensation have been made to the
property owners.
4. Resolution No. 00-020, a Resolution of Necessity of the Riverside
County Transportation Commission Declaring That The Acquisition
of Fee And Easement Interests in Certain Real Property Located in
Riverside County, California, More Particularly Described as APNS
347-100-004, 347-100-009 & 010, 347-110-001, 347-110-003,
347-110-008, 347-110-033, 347-110-052, 347-110-058,
347-110-061, 347-110-068, 347-120-016, 017 & 021,
347-130-016, 349-050-027, 349-050-028, 349-060-009,
349-090-007, 349-090-008, 349-090-13, 349-090-014,
349-100-001, 349-100-005, 377-020-008 & 377-040-013
(Project Parcel Nos. 13483-1, 13483-2, 13491-1, 13521-1,
13521-2, 13521-3, 13521-4, 13521-5, 13522-1, 13522-2,
13523-1, 13523-2, 13523-3, 13523-4, 13525-1, 13525-2,
13543-1, 13544-1, 13545-1, 13548-1, 13550-1, 13552-1,
13553-1, 13554-1, 13557-1, 13558-1, 13559-1, 13579-1,
13579-2, 13581-1, 13581-2, 13582-1, 13592-1, 13598-1,
13598-2, 13599-1, 13599-2, 13600-1, 13601-1, 13605-1 and
13606-1), by Eminent Domain Is Necessary for the Realignment
and Improvement of State Route 74 Between Dexter Avenue to
Wasson Canyon Road (Segment 1).
7B. AMEND APPENDIX OF THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE AND APPROVE
RESOLUTION NO. 00-019, 'RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AMENDING THE APPENDIX OF THE
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE PURSUANT TO THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT
OF 1974"
Chairman Mullen opened the public hearing, and hearing or seeing no one wishing
to present testimony, the public hearing was closed.
MISIC (Tavaglione/Stack) amend RCTC`s Conflict of Interest Code adding
the Public Information Officer and Property Agent to the list of designated
employees and approve Resolution No. 00-019, 'Resolution of the
Riverside County Transportation Commission Amending the Appendix of
the Conflict of Interest Code Pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974"
RCTC Meeting Minutes
December 13, 2000
Page 5
5. CONSENT CALENDAR - All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single
motion unless a Commissioneris} requests separate action on specific itemisi. Items
pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.
MISIC IHuntlKleindienst} to approve the following Consent Calendar items with the
exception of Agenda Item 8F, "Approve Caltrans Cooperative Agreement for the PS&E
Design of the Route 91 Auxiliary Lane Project from Tyler Street to Jane Street'
8A. CONTRACTS COST AND SCHEDULE REPORT
Receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Report for the month ending
October 31, 2000.
8B. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT
Receive and file the Single Signature Authority Report for the months of
September and October 2000.
8C. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT
Receive and file the Investment Report for the quarter ending September 30,
2000.
8D. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Receive and file the Financial Statements for the quarter ending September 30,
2000.
8E. QUARTERLY CALL BOX UPDATE
Receive and file the operational statistics for the Riverside County Motorist Aid
Call Box System for the quarter ending September 30, 2000.
8G. AUTHORIZATION TO BID LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION PACKAGE FOR SOUND
WALLS NO. 110, 121, AND 161
Authorize staff to advertise for construction bids for landscaping of Sound Walls
No. 110, 121, and 161 on Route 91 from Jackson Street to Jefferson Street in
the City of Riverside.
RCTC Meeting Minutes
December 13, 2000
Page 6
8H. AUTHORIZATION TO BID VEGETATION REMOVAL CONSTRUCTION PACKAGE
FOR STATE ROUTE 74 REALIGNMENT
Authorize staff to advertise for construction bids to remove vegetation along
State Route 74.
81. APPROVE CALTRANS' PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS NO. M006
FOR THE PEDLEY METROLINK STATION CCTV SYSTEM AND M007 FOR THE
SANTA FE DEPOT RESTORATION PROJECT
Approve Caltrans' Program Supplement No's. M006 for the Construction of
Security Enhancements for the Pedley Station and M007 for the Santa Fe Depot
Restoration Project to Agency -State Agreement No. 08-054.
8J. APPROVE SELECTION PROCESS TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES
RELATED TO THE SAN JACINTO BRANCH LINE IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BETWEEN THE CITIES OF RIVERSIDE AND PERRIS
1) Approve the results of the selection process to provide the Commission
Engineering Services Related to the San Jacinto Branch Line between the Cities
of Riverside and Perris; 2) Direct staff to negotiate the scope, schedule and cost
with the top ranked firm to perform the required services of negotiations fail with
the top ranked firm, staff is authorized to go to the next firm on the list to
negotiate a contract to perform the services); and, 3) Direct staff to bring back
an authorization to award a contract to the firm with which negotiations are
successful.
8K. CALL BOX UPGRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND COMARCO WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES
1) Enter into an agreement between the Riverside County Transportation
Commission and Comarco Wireless Technologies to upgrade the call box system
in Riverside County; 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel
review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and, 3) Accept
Comarco's offer to reduce the first year maintenance costs by $30,341 .25 and
direct staff to incorporate the cost savings in the Comarco System Upgrade
Agreement.
RCTC Meeting Minutes
December 13, 2000
Page 7
8L. APPROVAL OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY REPORT FOR THE NORTH/SOUTH
CORRIDORS BETWEEN I-10 AND SR-60 BETWEEN 1-15 AND 1-215
1) Receive and file the Feasibility Study Report for the North/South Corridors
between I-10 and SR-60 between 1-15 and 1-215 per Contract No, RO-9936; and,
2) Approve the recommendations contained in the report.
8M. METROLINK 2000 ONBOARD SURVEY PRELIMINARY RESULTS
Receive and file the presentation on the Metrolink 2000 Onboard Survey as an
information item.
8N. RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE
Receive and file the Rail Program Update as an information item.
80. CONSULTANT SELECTION FOR THE PERFORMANCE AUDITS OF THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSIT OPERATORS
Enter into a contract with O'Melia Consulting to conduct the Performance Audits
of the Riverside County Transportation Commission and the Riverside County
Transit Operators in an amount not to exceed $70,000, pursuant to Legal
Counsel review using the standard contract.
8P. REALLOCATE LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS AND AMEND SUNLINE
TRANSIT AGENCY'S SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FOR FY 00/01
To: 1) Reprogram $680,000 in Local Transportation Funds originally identified for
the purchase of two expansion buses. $346,000 of the reprogrammed funds will
be used for bus maintenance and modifications to their maintenance facility, with
the balance of $334,000 set aside as capital reserves; and, 2) Amend SunLine
Transit Agency's Short Range Transit Plan for FY 00/01.
8Q. REQUEST FROM ANZA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION TO PURCHASE NEW
WHEELCHAIR LIFT EQUIPPED VEHICLE
To approve: 1) Reallocation of Measure "A" Specialized Transit funds in the total
amount of $16,916 ($10,212 from FY 98/99 and $6,704 from FY 99/00) for the
purchase of a new wheelchair lift equipped vehicle; 2)Re-designate Measure "A"
Specialized Transit funds in the total amount of $13,820 ($6,500 from FY 00/01
and $7,320 from FY 01 /02); and, 3) Direct Anza Valley Transportation to secure
a minimum of three bids for the purchase of a vehicle (including one through the
RCTC Meeting Minutes
December 13, 2000
Page 8
Riverside Transit Agency's procurement process or through Caltrans' Section
5310 Program).
8R. RE -BID OF SMART CALL BOX INSTALLATIONS AND ENHANCED TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT CENTER SITES
To re -bid the Request for Proposals/Bid Package for the installation of Smart Call
Boxes and Caltrans Traffic Management Center Sites for the purpose of including
updated federal provisions.
8S. 2001 RCTC COMMISSION/COMMITTEE CALENDAR
Receive and file the schedule of Commission and Committee meetings for the
year 2001.
8T. AMENDMENT OF RCTC's ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE
NO. 00-002, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE"
Adopt Ordinance No. 00-002, "An Ordinance Amending the Riverside County
Transportation Commission Administrative" to incorporate the changes approved
by the Commission to add a 2nd Vice Chair to its officers and to hold the election
of officers in December, with the changes to take effect on January 1.
6. RCTC'S ALAMEDA CORRIDOR -EAST (ACE) GRADE CROSSING PRIORITY LIST
Stephanie Wiggins, Program Manager, informed the Commission that the Governor's
Transportation Congestion Relief Plan allocated $273 billion for grade separation for the
Alameda Corridor -East did not include Riverside County in the allocation. However,
Riverside County was included in the amended legislation as a participant in the Corridor
Plan, thus, resulting in the expansion of the geographic area of the trade corridor into
Riverside County and a prioritized list of grade crossings along the UP Los Angeles
Subdivision, UP Yuma Main, and BNSF San Bernardino Subdivision must be developed.
Staff requested the jurisdictions (cities of Banning, Beaumont, Calimesa, Coachella,
Corona, Indio and Riverside) which have at grade crossings along the three main lines to
submit a grade crossing prioritization form In Riverside County, there are 59 public at -
grade crossings on the Corridor that will be impacted by the projected increased in train
traffic within the next few years. Parsons Brinckerhoff facilitated the development of
the list. The list in the packet is the first attempt and may be revised over the next few
weeks. She mentioned that one change being proposed is for Jurupa Road grade
separation tol be moved up to Tier I. This list will allow RCTC to effectively deliberate
at the table with the other three county partners, Los Angeles, Orange County and San
Bernardino.. A draft report of the corridor plan will be forwarded to the Commission in
RCTC Meeting Minutes
December 13, 2000
Page 9
April and the final plan will be approved by the California Transportation Commission in
July. The report will be used by the State to assist in funding and reauthorization of
TEA 21, which is staff's goal in this effort. By developing a prioritized list that
represents the needs of Riverside County, will provide the opportunity to be on an equal
footing with the three county neighbors in the development of the trade corridor fund.
Chairman Mullen was concerned that moving Jurupa Road to Tier I will not appropriately
compete comparatively, using the present formula, because it is in a rural area.
Commissioner Tavaglione understood Chairman Mullen's concern regarding Jurupa Road,
but the problem is its proximity to Van Buren Boulevard and the number of cars that
cross that road each day. There is no stacking area, as Van Buren Boulevard traffic
continues to increase, there is no place for cars to back up. It is a very serious safety
issue that needs to be addressed. In addition, three roads converge at the railroad
tracks.
In response to Commissioner Buster's question on what the estimated cost to fund the
first two tiers with the average cost of a grade separation at about $15 million, Eric
Haley, Executive Director, estimated that the top two tiers would cost between
$300-$400 million. That is probably outside the limits of what RCTC would receive if
the federal government were to allocate about a $2 billion program for Southern
California.
J.D. Douglas, Parsons Brinckerhoff, clarified that data was received late in the process
and after the table was created for RCTC so there were some blank areas in the table
contained in the agenda packet. The table is currently being updated and the data is
being incorporated.
Commissioner Tavaglione asked if J.D. Douglas assist with the Jurupa Road as the issue
is not just free flow of train traffic. There is a spur that heads off at Jurupa Road and
goes off into the Ague Mansa Enterprise Zone which has just been expanded and will
continue to grow. There is also an issue of the Ford Distribution Facility around Etiwanda
and Magnolia with the large trains.
J.D. Douglas stated that County staff pointed out during the course of reviewing the
analysis that the delay calculations over those three crossings along Van Buren, did not
reflect the fact that the traffic on those three streets delayed as well as the traffic and
Van Buren due to all red flashing of the singles at those locations. Traffic volumes have
been obtained on Van Buren and estimated delays will be factored and expected that the
Jurupa Crossing will show sufficient delay due to the Van Buren traffic.
Chairman Mullen asked if that was also the case on Magnolia Avenue in the City of
Riverside and continuing on to Merrill, Brockton and Streeter.
RCTC Meeting Minutes
December 13, 2000
Page 10
Commissioner Ameal Moore added that the City has been dealing with the train noise
problem as long as he has been on the City Council. The City continues to receive many
calls regarding the noise problem because of the number of whistles required to come
through the city. In addition, the diesel fumes is a major problem. If that is going to be
used as a criteria, that crossing would be in the number one category instead of being
listed as second.
In response to Commissioner Greg Schook as to how the noise problem was use as a
determining factor for developing the list, J.D. Douglas replied that the RCTC Technical
Advisory Committee (TAC) felt that the environmental noise factor was one of the
important issues. Because of the timing, it was essential that Riverside County develop
their priority list because the other three counties have already done so.
Eric Haley explained that the Commission's TAC is comprised of the Public Works
Directors, or in some cases City Managers. The Commission, as an active participant
in the region, would be lobbying the federal government for major funds, truck lanes,
interchange improvements, and a number of goods movement related investments, not
just for grade separations. This item will come back to the Commission when the
lobbying takes place and this will be reviewed further.
Commissioner Tavaglione asked if the TAC signed off on moving Jurupa to Tier 1 and
J.D. Douglas replied that the committee heard the county's request that additional delay
be considered and there were no dissensions.
Commissioner Robin Lowe informed the Commission that Jurupa Road was not discussed
by the Plans and Programs Committee.
Chairman Mullen explained that about 80% of train traffic out of the Alameda Corridor
to the rest of the country passes through Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. In this
way, the Inland Empire is adversely impacted.
Eric Haley added that the State has asked the region, those within the Alameda Corridor
East, to look at the entire system and come up with a package. Staff's goal is to make
sure that Riverside County's interests are adequately represented within that. As a
region, we will be lobbying for these projects this spring.
MIS (Tavaglione/Hall) approve the RCTC Alameda Corridor -East Grade Crossing
Priority List presented by Parsons Brinckerhoff, including moving Jurupa Road to
Tier 1.
M/SIC (Mullen/Moore) to approve the RCTC Alameda Corridor -East Grade
Crossing Priority List, as presented (not moving Jurupa Road to Tier I).
RCTC Meeting Minutes
December 13, 2000
Page 11
Ayes: 21
Nays: 6
7. AUTHORIZE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONTRACT NO. RO-9861 TO SUPPORT DESIGN
AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROUTE 91, MAGNOLIA AVENUE TO MARY STREET
AUXILIARY LANE PROJECT, AND PHASE II SOUND WALL #36
MISIC (Hunt/Williams) to: 1) Approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract No.
RO-9861, with URS Corporation, for additional engineering design services and
construction support services required to support design and construction of the
Route 91, Magnolia Avenue to Mary Street Auxiliary Lane Project, and the new
Phase II Sound Wall #36, for an additional Base Work of $383,728 and additional
Extra Work of $41,272 for a total Amendment value of $ 425,000; and, 2)
Authorize the Chairman to execute the amendment on behalf of the Commission,
pursuant to Legal Counsel review, using the standard amendment format.
8. AMENDMENT #1 TO CONTRACT NO. RO-2027 FOR THE PROPOSED NEW METROLINK
COMMUTER RAIL STATION IN DOWNTOWN CORONA NEAR MAIN STREET AND
ROUTE 91
MISIC (Hunt/Williams) to: 1 j Concur with the station concept and staging plan for
the proposed new Metrolink Commuter Rail Station in Downtown Corona near
Main Street and Route 91; 2) Approve Amendment #1 to Contract No. RO-2027
to Daniel, Mann, Johnson, & Mendenhall (DMJM) to provide final Plans,
Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) Design Services, and environmental
clearance for the proposed new Metrolink Commuter Rail Station, for a base
amount of $625,000, with an extra work contingency of $75,000, for a total not
to exceed Contract value of $700,000; and, 3) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant
to Legal Counsel review, to execute the Contract on behalf of the Commission.
9. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA
8F. APPROVE CALTRANS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE FINAL PS&E
DESIGN OF THE ROUTE 91 AUXILIARY LANE PROJECT FROM TYLER STREET
TO JANE STREET
Eric Haley asked Commissioner Stan Lisiewicz to inform the Commission on how
Proposition 35 which allows more liberal contracting out opportunities for
Ca!trans and local transportation entities will be implemented.
Commissioner Lisiewicz stated that projects estimated between $4.5-$36 million
per year will be contracted out. He acknowledged the efforts of Garry Cohoe as
being instrumental in negotiating with staff.
RCTC Meeting Minutes
December 13, 2000
Page 12
M/S/C (Mullen/Venable) to: 1 j Approve the Cooperative Agreement with
Ca!trans for RCTC to provide the final PS&E Design for the Route 91
Auxiliary Lane Project from Tyler Street to Jane Street in the City of
Riverside; and, 2) Authorize the Chairman, pursuant to Legal Counsel
review, to execute the Cooperative Agreement on behalf of the
Commission.
10. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
A. California Transportation Commission Meeting/Tour/Reception
Chairman Mullen noted Vice Chairman Kleindienst's outstanding job as master of
ceremonies at the reception for CTC Commissioner Bob Wolf and also staff for
coordinating the activities.
Commissioner Lowe added that it was a tribute to Riverside County and she
believed that the CTC Commission now understands how important local
representation is to this County and how much Bob Wolf is thought of.
Eric Haley provided details of coordinated activities for the CTC and for the
reception. The helicopter tour showed a clear view of the area's issues as it
relates to the goods movement, the need to construct the 91 /215/60 interchange
and the commuter traffic coming east at 5:00 p.m. At the CTC meeting, the
following day, Commissioner Wolf was successful in adding an additional $3.25
million into the immediate commitment from the State. Route 60, which was the
Commission's highest priority in 1996 after Measure "A", 1-15 to Valley
Boulevard is now 92To funded by the State.
B. Status of Projects
Eric Haley said that RCTC put a package together in about ninety days time on
the interchange. Route 74 is moving forward and is ahead of schedule. CETAP
has received additional allocation. Two new train stations are on line. The rail
program in the Hemet/San Jacinto line is moving forward. Industrial
development on 1-215 is moving forward. Route 60 truck climbing lane is under
construction. Route 79 realignment work is moving fast. Route 86 is on
schedule and moving forward towards completion which has been an the top
priority of Riverside County for over 25 years.
Chairman Mullen stated that the challenges ahead are overwhelming with CETAP,
the integration process of CETAP and multi -species habitat conservation plan and
all of the general plans moving forward. The other issue that RCTC is looking at
is the extension of Measure "A". The polls which will be completed in the next
RCTC Meeting Minutes
December 13, 2000
Page 13
few weeks will be completed and the Commission will need to review them to
determine how aggressively the Measure "A" extension should move forward.
At this time, Vice Chairman Kleindienst commented that Chairman Mullen has been an
aggressive, creative leader the entire year.
14. ELECTION OF OFFICERS AND REPRESENTATIVES TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Chairman Mullen informed the Commission that the Board of Supervisors took action last
week to recommend to the Commission that County's representatives to the RCTC
Executive Committee be Commissioners Buster, Venable and Wilson. The County also
nominated Commissioner Tavaglione for the Vice Chairman position.
MISIC (Kelly/Hunt) nominated Will Kleindienst as Chairman. The Commission
unanimously elected Will Kleindienst as its Chairman for 2001.
M/SC (Mullen/Hunt) nominated John Tavaglione as Vice Chairman. The
Commission unanimously elected John Tavaglione as Vice Chairman.
MIS (Ruppert/Byrd) nominate Robin Lowe as 2' Vice Chairman.
MIS (Pettis/Trembly) nominate Ron Roberts as 2"d Vice Chairman.
At this time, discussion was held as to the election for the 2"d Vice Chairman.
Suggestions were made such as that since this position will be held by a city
representative that the county withhold from voting for this position, and for
geographical representation, this position be held by a western county
representative that the Coachella Valley representatives withhold from voting for
this position.
Based on discussions and that it appeared that the selection of a 2`d Vice
Chairman was developing in a negative fashion, Commissioner Lowe withdrew
her name from nomination for the 2nd Vice Chairman position. The nominators
accepted her withdrawal.
The Commission unanimously elected Ron Roberts as its 2nd Vice
Chairman.
At this time, the Commission took a brief recess in order for the Commissioners
representing the cities from the Coachella Valley and Mid -Valley areas to select
their representative to the Executive Committee. The meeting reconvened and
it was announced that the following were selected as members of the Executive
Committee: Dick Kelly - Coachella Valley area, Robin Lowe - Mid Valley area.
RCTC Meeting Minutes
December 13, 2000
Page 14
At 1 1:00 a.m., Steve DeBaun announced the Closed Session item and the Commission
adjourned to Closed Session.
15. CLOSED SESSION
Conference with Real Property Negotiator Pursuant to Section 54946.8
Negotiating Parties: Commission: Executive Director or Designee
Property Owners: See following list for property owners.
SR 74 Right of Way Acquisitions
No.
APN
GRANTOR
1
377-030-014
Gateway Commercial 87, Gen. Part.
2
377-020-017
Nielson Trust c/o Rod Nielson
3
377-020-016
Nielson Trust clo Rod Nielson
4
377-020-021
Billy J. Van Meter, et. al.
5
377-020-022
Billy J. Van Meter, et. al.
6
377-020-005
William G. & Roselyn J. Hall
7
377-404-001
Randy J. Dugan, et. ux.
8
377-372-026
James & Ofelia McCall
9
377-372-025
James & Ofella McCall
10
377-372-013
E.V.M.W.D.
11
377-372-029
Rollin & Opal Forsyth
12
377-372-031
Rollin & Opal Forsyth
13
377-372-030
Peter & Vaso Lembesis
14
377-392-005
Eliseo R. Rojas
15
377-392-009
Burnham K. Drake
16
377-391-001
William T. Gaffey
17
377-373-008
White Rock Acquisition
18
347-120-020
White Rock Acquisition
19
347-130-018
Bill E. & Rae Jean Long
20
347-130-019
Sandra N. Sandor, a Widow
21
347-130-009
Vlasio S. Andrews, et. al.
22
347-130-022
Henry M. Rowell, et. al.
23
347-090-028
Richard Huffman, et. ux.
24
347-090-027
Edward A. Feser, et. ux
25
347-090-029
Crater Acres, Ltd.
26
347-100-002
Crater Acres, Ltd.
27
347-100-016
North Peak Partners, L.P.
28
347-110-004
North Peak Partners, L.P.
RCTC Meeting Minutes
December 13, 2000
Page 15
29
347-110-053
Johnnie Williams, et. ux.
30
347-1 10-046
Moises F. Pabon, Sr., et. ux.
31
349-400-001
Frank Anzaldi, et. al.
32
349-060-019
J. Kirk Harns
33
349-060-018
J. Kirk Harns
34
349-060-010
Mark A. Ditmer
35
349-060-025
Morris M. Ewing, et. ux.
36
349-060-012
George V. & Ekaterini A. Andrews, et. al.
37
349-060-013
George V. & Ekaterini A. Andrews, et. al.
38
349-060-014
Pat Gilboy
39
349-060-015
Leona Jackson
40
349-060-020
J. Kirk Harns
41
349-060-029
Kimber L. Lawson
42
349-060-024
Patricia K. Johnson
43
349-060-022
Patricia K. Johnson
44
349-060-008
E.V.M.W.D.
45
349-050-025
James A. & Estela L. Gonzales
46
349-050-026
Jean & Nichole Yvonne Daum
47
347-100-003
Theodore L. Gamst, et. ux.
48
349-050-064
Lamar Raul Gi!land
49
349-050-063
Jean L. Burbidge
50
349-050-028
Richard A. Thatcher, Jr.
The Commission reconvened at 11 :10 a.m. Steve DeBaun announced that there was
no reportable action for the Closed Session.
16. ADJOURNMENT
With no other items to be discussed by the Commission, Chairman Mullen adjourned the
meeting at 1 1 :15 a.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:00
a.m., Wednesday, January 10, 2001, at the University of California Chancellor's
Conference Room, 1201 University Avenue, #207, Riverside, California.
Respectfully submitted,
-6\,
Naty K enhav)-*"
Clerk of the Board
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
COMMISSION MEETING
DATE: ,%j24 3/DD
SIGN -IN SHEET
NAME
04447b 'N-e"ryk."4
ke
Rb c) ; 1 so,
�GPse rho L. VAL (V1
v_.
CA.“ b
re gapper7
N„64.1/c.1 ,CPA
.-2?
K
AGENCY TELEPHONE /FAX NUMBER
Pa IsmA s (144,)'4'33.67.ov / "74.% wall
%9- 7zz ,3rle.,/ 97.z 3, zs
T.21141 ASe"fr--i— U0)3406/I 0a)34-65-7,---
Vw(cu -Qc(-3)-izi)
&I) -14 - °I CU l /
(ei0,6 . yv-
C .4u410tit
'a_
Cpir-k-Lt o 04
A5ed- NaT 5/0(,n s
LA_- CSC Nr7t.
. . �.... a•A's
c,4
(Soo6 9 -s`- -t 0P' o
1(.43 - `to - c.)3(4 ?1_
Tea 52 T-047
232931
-77 7- 7a 770 l 777 - 7l ci
76 /
7jo.3 yrAytr,
F:69 - 3)
lba-34.7-4.s-PD /,te o�
.7y-7/Y, l
1//5 jeo 6 /
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
NAME
F mac. 5 �� GC
�M Pill, oo rem
I".3 rc_c.. /0 s
BED i f
S4qi Li s l'e to o Z
DATE:
COMMISSION MEETING
/71, 3/6;5.
SIGN -IN SHEET
AGENCY
AlO.QCd
&v2
,ea A./ c y o ro i 2 �co c3
C 1 vT/'gveiSiteie
n1� 01ECuv¢
L, a j f ra ri S
TELEPHONE /FAX NUMBER
7 5 -21 9e3 1 (�—cig)
qdP r-q.C.F--/D/D SSS -)0/9
90.3- Al I
740- 32V-qs!/ /
?Of 824 5!d, 11
pp 'o, 65-617376/ 909' Cs� z/c--fG
709. 5.y �w1 0?) 6 9 3 o p s�
(90?) 3H3 -go �'�- 1 6g37
1
1
1
1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: ,2/ VO0
SIGN -IN SHEET
IF YOU WISH TO PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, PLEASE COMPLETE AND
SUBMIT A TESTIMONY CARD TO THE CLERK OF THE COMMISSION
NAME
G ft 44-1
Z �u (_ A- 72 Win_ OU
1),/ I , i
r. /� C p � L'(1 L I 1)/4
P�(i-J7� �
J C DzA
�,t>
4,4"y PW/N);1-14)1_7
10-4
6 Ici 54501�ivc
i mac, t--6 0, r��
Pt IvrO���
n A
‘pA 610-Lo t
Signing is not required
AGENCY
TELEPHONE /FAX NUMBER
F-73 "I'S F'73 -Y9r8
lky5/ . 65 2.7/.0 -
�Ui�C%� 3V6 //z7/
f'��.)u�r�27 �C r/e_s-L/ 7C-7-8S z C
?jam CA,,"
1¢ , +A-L 5
P.) m/to
etO
k./\11 U C5-
C 192o! nc�.
se46--
acidiu sec.
(96i )7.36 ) z125-'
Noon --1-6-/ - w a s
/743
(96i) 396 - 269e / (909) s 96
cjo9-73e - Ira
�aq 789-352.16"
(2127)9n-o-,tl3'[v, 9e14b
(169Y6-�- 5124 1eyti)3S;-79�
6e/-00e)/
/
/
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 10, 2001
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Ivan M. Chand, Chief Financial Officer
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission receive and file the Commission's comprehensive annual financial
report (CAFR) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Enclosed in the Commission's agenda packet is the CAFR for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2000. Staff prepares this report on annual basis for submission to the
Government Finance Officers Association and distribution to the rating agencies and
other financial institutions. Rating agencies and other financial institutions use this
report to evaluate the Commission's financial operation and financial data. The CAFR
contains information regarding the overall financial operation of the Commission, the
financial statements and statistics that provide a history of the Commission's financial
condition.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 10, 2001
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager
Louie Martin, Bechtel Project Controls
THROUGH:
Hideo Sugita, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Contracts Cost and Schedule Report
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission receive and file the Contracts Cost and Schedule Report for the
month ending November 30, 2000.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The attached material depicts the current costs and schedule status of contracts
reported by routes, commitments, and cooperative agreements executed by the
Commission. For each contract and agreement, the report lists the authorized value
approved by the Commission, percentage of contract amount expended to date, and
the project expenditures by route with status for the month ending November 30,
2000.
Attachments
000002
%l'16
%S' 6 L
%Z•8L
%4-L9
ifzi
%V.8S
%09 L
%9.6Z
%6.9
L68170eSS
86617E96
80eL6L' L $
Z L6'999'9$
Z6 L'OOE'6$
Ot t'OO L S
996'LE L $
08S'S9L$
899'4S$
°kV00L
%0.001
%0.06
E ;Q L esed
EL L'8L8'S $
606'EE6'S IS
ooa�o��x
000'OE9 $
OOL'E9S'L$
001'900'Z$
40S'9Ze9$
000'OOE'Z$
008'ZE9'0I $
V6$`fi4..0
000'6ZZ'Z$
Cy,
C�
Cr-
inn
(9106 '90060S) 'ualnu31BiBu3 Aneurwlleid
S1331'044 9LZ I
$8 l Oki "vicunas
i6SOVSb66'9466'£E6601!) 6uldeospuel llennpuS
(SES60S1 doves NooH Alma pnl8 uvula um
(8SOZ1
{EVOZ`6966'ZES6'8486' 1986'L486'LEE6' L0L60b1
uoponusuoo pue uelsap numpunog
91031'01id L6 31f1011
gVAOU WAN**
1986 `I586-6b86'E4L6'SE96
IBES6'LES6'OES6'SZS6`EZS6'4EZ6'LZZ6 '6LZSOSI
S1031'Oifd L L L 31f10LI
s nnoki 1 LMan
i 19660a1 seuel uinl lyBla vg Apnls luowuBlleaa
mo ldr uounu a M u u aou IBu3
S1331'0411 61- 31I10k1
�L �.ff10kS i{M4718f�$
(9966'4566 LbOZ08) MOU/LH lnu31Buueau!Su3
S1031'Dlld tic 3111011
(Z40Z) 'pn18 sPuelpay 0) SI /09 AOH uBisea PAW
9103r044 09 3111011
31V0 Ol SiNINIMINO3 MVO 01 OO/OE,l l NOI1VO011V 31V0 Ol NOI1VO011V NOI1diaosaO
1SNIVJV 31V0-01. S3llfillON3dX3 O3ON3 H1NON) 'Hint/ 1SNIVOV S1N3W11WW0, O3ZI1i0HInV 103f'OHd
S31:11111ON3dX3 % 1:103 3k lLION3dX3 d311141W0O % 1V41t11OVHINO0 NOISSIWYVOO
311104 A9 ° 40d31i 13D0f18
91331'0E1d llViilAVN I „V,. 31if1SV3W 0134
%E' Le
%94 EL
%L's4
941:EL
%0'ES
%9' L6
%1,*04
%VEIL
'Eri cc's
Z80'9P6'1$
ZEV9L9' IS
09V89 $
961'ELE' L $
L11042 Le0
LWZIES
L99'0 I $
Z60'191.$
131.b:OVE
00
% L
%VIM
%0" 00
%0'001,
%0.86
%6'06
E 10 Z gegd
r0.9f!.
zov'o L8'ZIS
009 '9V9`ZS
L6t6Z'Z$
000 'SZ L $
VO 'Sit l $
000 00.17$
ZO4'06 L 'E L6
009 '1389'Z $
.114 teZ.-ZO:
L L6'E6rZ$
000'SZ L $
4065LitetiV
000'09 L' L $
aoo•otrtts
000'01717 $
UV° 01 S1NIN110116103 31V0 01 00/0E/ I I NOUN/0011V ava ai. NOI1V0011V
1SNIVOY 31V0 01 9311C1110N3dX3 030N3 H1NOIN 1-11f1V 1SNIVDV S1N1N1IININO3 03Z11,101-11.11V
S31:111110143dY3 % I:10A 3lif11I0N3dX3 03111ININ03 % 1 V EI(110 VII1N00 NOISSIININOD
31(1021 A13 180.138 1300(18
8133r01:1d AVMH0111 31:813V3W 3131I
4600'
(:Z:L'..6:6;ZE66'L966'ES66'SV86'6Z66'990Z'9Z0V0000)
S1S03 lu!etAlls1s03 dO/b3v allSiu04e1S
OZ L Z'LZOZ' I EOZOti
(8Z0r9566'4S8617486.E£26'ZE86'1EL6'0Z46 01:1)
Supasupuxseipnis
11101 Hainilii103
muti4miv4inetigns
IL 166) 1914 Z) L 86) ILL 12-101.Z) (6586 Oili
WYMAN '10133M/343111-N-Nl1tid
IltYgOt0.- .
(9s660u) Awns Joppio3 tonostvoN
S331A113S V NVIci INVVDOlid
!:1404..40!*.4.040.0
(00 t z oai
• AH3S 11101,11.211SNOD .1.33r0Hd
04v.H.40.00.1*.i•441410
19466'9Z660E11 bu!cleospuei piewnA
1111111001:1d 71011d1All 3ONVH31:131M
N1011d11:i3S3O
lo3road
1f]
O
O
CD
CD
E ;a E °Bed
00/0e,I 1 : M f. lnJ.0
•sleflpnq aeeik le3eg o) pe}elea iou pue wenuo3/23eFoad Jew; a0j aae sanfen ITV
•sul,eaBoad lueulan0aduli aeueyaaalul lsuiefle ue0ri [aLON
%a'
%T9L
%T9L
%S'9L
%T9L
96t'8.
%C 69
%se 1
%t•EL
O$
0$
0$
0$
OS
0$
Z08'9E9' l $
LZ6'L68'£S
OOS'E L 0L $
LEL'L8.0'L$
E06'6LS'£S
l68'btL'l$
L906E L'Z$
LZO'tr60'9S
00S'bZE'L$
6 07'9E6' L S
EZ9'Z IZ'SS
4pQ'QI>� 4f <
000'009'L$
O '•
L90'6El'ZS
LZO'b60 9$
00917ZE't $
6lti'9E6'L$
EZ9'ZLZ'S$
000'AOS' E 9
000'009'LS
E'
Ill
�E11'.
s;wJdwl pow pug nears wool vi 0/1 gwnA
00aoN 40 A110
B;uewsAwdwl pew 12 sleaJ;s 1e001
inno3YY31 d0 A110
BIuaW9A0Jdw! pew le mans pool
O1N101 r NVS d0 A110
mieworkwdwi pew 12 slecws pool
SIWII3d 40 A110
��lO.'1 �Li x1t0
o s
wri onJls eBeuplup uJJoIS
72 se6ueyoJe;u1 upoull 'g eldeyy `441ws
VN01100 d0 A110
Nt 01 MiR3 HOItt0'MOMS
aluawaAwdwl pa uoAue0 peomea
3ib''1 NOANVO 10 A110
'11iNW00 03A0Nddtl 1N3W11YVW00 30NV1tl8 S33NYAOtl 00/0E/1. L 1N3W11W1N00
iSNIVONI 31V0'OL 9NIaNVisif10 NVO1 .V. 31inswavu 030N3 NINON 03A0FIddV
3ONV1V9 NVOI % ONIONVIS1110 11)101 LlOd 34111110N3dX3
N011d1110S30
103COlfd
103road A8 laOd3k1Japans
S103f0k1d SOVOl1'$ S13311iS 1V0011JVA6HOlH „V,. 3l1f1SV31/0 013W
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 10, 2001
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Commissioner Phil Stack
SUBJECT:
Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Services Transportation Advisory
Committee
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission appoint the list of candidates and their terms to the Citizens
Advisory Committee/Social Services Transportation Advisory Committee
(CACISSTAC).
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
At the July 12, 2000 Commission meeting, Vice Chairman Will Kleindienst appointed
an Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Phil Stack, Jim Venable, and
Andrea Puga to restructure the Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Service
Transportation Advisory Council.
The Ad Hoc Committee met on August 16, 2000 to review the Commission's
statutory requirements and to determine the types of issues that the CAC/SSTAC
should address and make recommendations to the Commission. In September, the Ad
Hoc Committee presented, and the Commission approved, the following
recommendations: 1) Refocus the Citizens Advisory Committee/Social Service
Transportation Advisory Council (CACISSTAC) from operational transit issues to a
broader based, policy oriented committee; 2) Terminate existing membership of the
CACISSTAC; 3) Request Commissioners to submit names and completed application
forms of potential candidates to the Ad Hoc Sub Committee for review and
recommendation; 4) Establish membership of the CACISSTAC at 15 members; 51
Direct staff to prepare letters of appreciation to members of the CACISSTAC. Letters
will be signed by the RCTC Chairman; and, 6) Direct legal counsel to amend the by-
laws of the CACISSTAC and RCTC's administrative by-laws to reflect these changes.
The Ad Hoc Committee determined that nominations of candidates for the new
CACISSTAC be sought from Commissioners and they directed staff to forward
applications and to encourage former CACISSTAC to apply. The following list of
candidates, including the membership criteria that the candidate will fill, terms and
qualifications are as follows:
Name/Area
Represented
Categorical Membership
Term Date
Nominated By
Qualifications
Jim Collins
Indio
Potential transit user who
is 60 years of age or
older.
2
Expires 1 /03
Commissioner Roy
Wilson
Previous CAC / SSTAC member
Peter Benavidez
Riverside
Potential transit user who
is disabled.
2
Expires 1 /03
Previous CAC /
SSTAC member.
Previous CAC / SSTAC member
William Densmore
Riverside County
Social service provider for
senior citizens / disabled /
limited means.
2
Expires 1 /03
Previous CAC /
SSTAC member.
Previous CAC / SSTAC member
Judylynn Gries
Riverside
Social service
transportation provider for
disabled.
1
Expires 1 /02
Previous CAC /
SSTAC member.
Previous CAC / SSTAC member
Judy Nieburger
Moreno Valley
Social service provider for
senior citizens/disabled.
3
Expires 1 /04
Commissioner Tom Mullen
Past RCTC and Metrolink member
Fortunato Penilla
Riverside County
Social service provider for
disabled.
3
Expires 1 /04
Previous CAC /
SSTAC member
Previous CAC / SSTAC member
Sherry Thibodeaux
Riverside
Social service provider for
persons of limited means.
1
Expires 1 /02
Learned of opening
through attendance of
CAC meetings.
Interested in transit issues. Works for the
Community Access Center. Hosts support
groups for women with disabilities and
domestic violence cases.
Mike Wertz
La Quinta
Social service provider for
persons of limited means
and disabled transit user.
1
Expires 1 /02
Learned of opening
through attendance of
SunLine ACCESS mtgs.
Branch manager of Living Center for 6 '/z
years and is a member of SunLine's
Access Committee.
Cindy Scheirer
Pedley
Community member.
2
Expires 1 /03
Commissioner John
Tavaglione
Involved in community issues and has
attended Transportation Now meetings.
Andrea Puga
Corona
Community member.
1
Expires 1 /02
Commissioner John Hunt
Past member of RCTC, RTA and
Metrolink.
Pat Murphy
Cathedral City
Membership from
business community.
2
Expires 1 /03
Supervisor Roy Wilson
Has vast experience dealing with
transportation issues in the region, past
member of RCTC, past President of
League of Cities.
Chris Millen
Banning
Social service
transportation provider for
the disabled / limited
means.
3
Expires 1 /04
Heard about the CAC
opening.
Works for the City of Banning transit
service, participated in the Pass Area
Transit Study.
Sunline Apptment
Coachella Valley
Mary Sampson
Western Riverside
Consolidated
Transportation Service
Agency
3
Expires 1 /04
3
Expires 1 /04
SunLine Transit Agency staff.
Riverside Transit Agency staff.
ATTACHMENT I
MEMBERSHIP CRITERIA
According to Section 99238 of the Transportation Development Act, membership for
the Social Service Transportation Advisory Council (SSTAC) must consist of the
following members:
1) One (1) representative of potential transit users who is 60 years of age or older;
2) One (1) representative of potential transit users who is handicapped;
3) Two (2) representatives of the local social service providers for seniors,
including one representative of a social service transportation provider, if one
exists;
4) Two (2) representatives of local social service providers for the handicapped,
including one representative of a social service transportation provider, if one
exists;
5) One (1) representative of a local social service provider or persons of limited
means; and,
6) Two (2) representatives from the local consolidated transportation service
agency.
Goal is to have 15 members. Other members may be appointed. In appointing council
members, RCTC should strive to attain geographic and minority representation among
council members. The Ad Hoc Committee suggested soliciting memberships from
business community.
ATTACHMENT II
DETERMINED TOPIC AREAS TO BE CONSIDERED AND DISCUSSED BY
THE COMMISSION'S CITIZENS' ADVISORY COMMITTEE/SOCIAL
SERVICE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COUNCIL (CAC/SSTAC).
ADDITIONAL TOPIC AREAS MAY BE ADDED BY THE COMMISSION:
1) Legislative programs/education
2) Public relations/education
3) Reauthorization of Measure "A", including polling
4) Short Range Transit Plans
5) Overview and exposure to RCTC's programs and projects
6) Unmet Transit Needs - Palo Verde Valley
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 10, 2001
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Naty Kopenhaver, Director of Administrative Services
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
2001 Conferences/Workshops
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission approve: 1 } the list of 2001 Conferences/Meetings; 21 up to two
Commissioners may attend a conference/workshop, as provided for in the Commission's
budget and in accordance to RCTC's policy on attendance of conferences/workshops.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
As was done in the past, a list of upcoming conferences/workshops is presented to the
Commission for approval on an annual basis. The list consists of transportation related
conferences/workshops. For information purposes, only three of the ten
conferences/workshops approved by the Commission last year were attended by
Commissioners.
For 2001, staff is proposing approval of the following conferences/workshops:
•
.
.
•
.
•
Commuter Rail Conference, March 31-April 4, Seattle, WA
Legislative Conference, March 11-14, Washington, DC*
Rail Transit Conference, June 10-14, Boston, MA*
APTA Annual Meeting, Sept 30-Oct 4, Philadephia, PA
Railvolution, October, Location Not Known
UCLA Symposium, Est 3`d Wk of Oct, Lake Arrowhead, CA
Focus on the Future Conference, October, Location Not Known
*Dates conflict with RCTC scheduled meeting.
Note that there may be additional conferences/workshops known at this time. It is
proposed that the RCTC Chair be authorized to approve attendance of Commissioners to
such conferences/meetings. If a Commissioner is interested in attending a
conference/workshop, it is proposed that staff be contacted as soon as it is possible in
order to obtain the best possible rates for airfare, lodging and possible discounts for early
registrations.
Attached to the staff memorandum is the Commission's Attendance Policy.
RCTC CONFERENCE/WORKSHOP ATTENDANCE POLICY
1 . Each fiscal year, a list of upcoming conferences/workshops will be presented to the
Commission. The Commission will determine participation to the
conferences/workshops and the number of Commissioners to attend.
2. For conference/workshop not previously approved, Commissioners must obtain the
Chairperson's approval.
3. On those occasions when there are more Commissioners expressing interest in
attending a conference/workshop than the number of participants approved by the
Commission, the following may occur:
1 . A Commission member may determine to withdraw their request.
2. The Chairperson may direct staff to agendize the item and budget
amendment for Commission approval.
4. A Commissioner, after committing to attend a conference/workshop and is unable
to attend, must make every effort to have another Commissioner to attend. The
Commissioner unable to find a replacement to attend the conference/workshop, will
be responsible for reimbursing the Commission for costs incurred prior to
notification.
5. Commissioner(s) attending a conference/workshop must present an oral or written
report at the next Commission meeting.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 10, 2001
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Cathy Bechtel, Director of Planning and Programming
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
CETAP Update
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission receive and file the CETAP update.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Internal Corridors: Work is progressing on the two intra-county CETAP corridors
(Banning/Beaumont to Temecula -Winchester to Temecula study area, and Hemet to
Corona/Lake Elsinore). At their December 19'h meeting, the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors concurred with the RCTC's recommendations on the alternatives to carry
forward into the CEQA/NEPA process. On December 22nd, the necessary materials were
submitted to Caltrans and the NEPA/404 signatory agencies for concurrence on the CETAP
corridors Purpose and Need Statements, Evaluation Criteria and initial Alternatives.
Inter -County Corridors: The Orange County Transportation Authority has still not formally
agreed to be a funding partner in the Riverside County -Orange County corridor work. They
have expressed interest in CETAP and acknowledge the importance of working together
to solve our regional transportation issues. OCTA is in the process of developing a short-
term action plan in order to frame local concerns. Upon completion, which is expected in
April, a determination on their funding contribution will be made. The OCTA Board has
made a commitment to continue to work with RCTC during this process. We have made
presentations to two of their Measure M Growth Management Area Groups to inform them
of our plans. Additionally, we recently had a meeting with the District Ranger from the
Cleveland National Forest to provide an update on our project.
For the Moreno Valley to San Bernardino County corridor, a second policy meeting is
scheduled for January 10th. Information will be shared regarding traffic flow, anticipated
growth in the area, etc. A staff level Technical Advisory Committee was also instituted
for this corridor to support planning efforts. The SANBAG Board of Directors at their
December meeting, conceptually approved $500,000 in funding support for this corridor
to be split between SANBAG and the San Bernardino County jurisdictions within the study
area and directly affected by the study. The formula has been developed by SANBAG and
they are working to seek support with affected jurisdictions.
Transit integration: At the Board of Supervisors' December 19th meeting, approval was
also given to expand the scope of work to develop a strategy for a transit program,
organized around the Transit Oasis Concept, that can be implemented in western Riverside
County over a 30 year period on a phased basis. The strategy will identify the general
transit alignments for express services, probable locations for transit oases, a phasing
strategy, and possible early implementation components which will be consistent with the
RTA's Ten Year Strategic Plan. All work efforts will also be coordinated with the General
Plan, CETAP Corridors and MSHCP. The strategy will identify the sequence of steps,
agency responsibilities, and approximate funding levels for implementation of the program
over time. The Commission should expect to see presentations on the Transit Oasis
Concept in the next few months.
Funding: We were successful in receiving $939,500 in federal funds from the
Transportation and Community and System Preservation Program. Additionally, we have
been informed we will be receiving $532,000 in State Planning and Research funds. The
WRCOG has been a big help in our efforts to secure funding contributions from the
western county cities. On December 4, 2000, the WRCOG Executive Committee
unanimously endorsed a proposal for cities to provide a $1 per capita contribution for
CETAP. Assuming all cities agree to contribute, we can expect over $800,000 to support
CETAP. Presented below are our funding commitments to date:
AGENCY
TYPE OF FUNDS
FY 1999
FY 2000
FY 2001
TOTAL
RCTC
State Transp Improvement
Funds
$750,000
$500,000
$1,250,000
$2,500,000
County
Local Comprehensive Trans
Funds
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
SCAG
Federal Overall Work Program
$280,000
$500,000
$500,000
$1,280,000
DOT
TCSP Appropriation
$435,500
$939,500
$1,375,000
Ca!trans
State Planning Funds
$350,000
$532,000
$882,000
SANBAG*
San Bernardino Co.
Contributions
$500,000
$500,000
TOTAL FUNDS COMMITTED
$1,130,000
$1,785,500
$3,921,500
$6,837,000
TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED
$12,334,563
UNFUNDED
$5,497,563
* Conceptual Approval
Additional Funding Opportunities
Amount
Status
TCSP Appropriation for FY 2002
$1,000,000
Application due 1 /31/01
State Planning Funds for FY 01102
$750,000
Will Initiate New Request
Federal Overall Work Program for FY 01 /02
$1,000,000
Initiated request 12100
Western County Cities Per Capita Support ($1 per capital
$800,000
Awaiting City approvals
Orange County Contributions
$2,450,000
Pending OCTA action
TOTAL POSSIBLE NEW FUNDING
$6,000,000