HomeMy Public PortalAbout04 April 14, 1999 CommissionCOMM-COMM-00108
RCTC Meeting Agenda
April 14, 1999
Page 2
6A2. PROPOSED SB 836 VOLUNTARY RIDESHARE PROGRAM FOR THE
INLAND EMPIRE REGION Page 3
Overview
This item is for the Commission to authorize staff to: 1) approve the SB
836 1998 project detailed in the attached scope; 2) accept lead agency
responsibilities, as requested by SANBAG; and 3) after review by legal
counsel execute an agreement with Southern California Associated
Governments for implementation of the project.
3. FY 1999-2000 SECTION 5310 PROGRAM Page 12
Overview
This item is for the Commission to: 1) adopt the FY 1999-2000 FTA
Section 5310 Riverside County project rankings as recommended by the
Local Review Committee; 2) include the projects in the Regional
Transportation Improvement Plan, and 3) certify that the projects are
consistent with the local area regional transportation plan by adopting
Resolution No. 99-03, Certifying Project Consistency With Regional
Transportation Plan.
6A4. RAIL PROGRAM UPDATE Page 17
Overview
This item is for the Commission to review, receive and file the report.
6B. CONSENT CALENDAR - BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE
6B1. U.S. Census 2000 Page 35
Overview
This item is for the Commission to approve support of the Census 2000
resource position in the amount of $5, 000 to ensure a complete and
accurate Census 2000 count.
RCTC Meeting Agenda
April 14, 1999
Page 3
6B2. Release of Engineer's Estimate During Bidding Process Page 42
Overview
This item is for the Commission to direct staff to continue releasing the
Engineer's estimate a range without the detail in order to: 1) Be consistent
with the State bidding process since the projects are designed and
constructed to the State's standards and funded with State and Federal
dollars; 2) Encourage the maximum number of interested bidders to
participate in the bid; and, 3) Assure that all bidders are provided the
same information so that one bidder does not obtain information that
would provide it a strategic advantage over the other participating bidders.
6B3. State and Federal Legislative Update Page 45
Overview
This is item is for the Commission to approve the staff recommended bill
positions and receive and file the State and Federal Legislative Updates.
6B4. Request for Proposal for the Pedley Station Security System Design
Page 57
Overview
This item is for the Commission to direct staff to prepare a request for
proposal (RFP) from qualified consultants that can prepare the plans,
specifications, and cost estimate for the Pedley Metrolink railstation
security system and tie the system back to the Riverside Downtown
Station.
6B5. FY 1999-00 SB 821 Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities Program
Page 59
Overview
This item is for the Commission to authorize staff to release a Call for
Project for FY 1999-00 SB 821 funding and notify the cities, the County,
and local school districts for the estimated FY 1999-2000 SB 821
availability.
RCTC Meeting Agenda
April 14, 1999
Page 4
6B6. City of San Jacinto Request to Substitute Surface Transportation
Program (STP) Discretionary Project Page 60
Overview
This item is for the Commission to approve the City of San Jacinto's
request to reprogram STP Discretionary funds from the traffic signal at
Menlo and Highway 79 to Sanderson Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue.
6C. CONSENT CALENDAR - COMMITTEE AS A WHOLE RECOMMENDATION
(Note: Items under SC were reviewed by the Budget and Implementation
Committee's Committee As A Whole and they present their
recommendations.)
6C 1. Monthly Cost & Schedule Reports Page 64
Overview
This item is for the Commission to receive and file.
6C2. Quarterly Y2K Status Report Page 68
Overview
This item is for the Commission to receive and file.
6C3. Indirect Cost Rate
Overview
Page 70
This item is for the Commission to: 1) approve the indirect cost rate
developed by E&Y and, 2) authorize submittal of the report to the
California State Department of Transportation.
6C4. Fixed Asset Capitalization Policy Page 85
Overview
This item is to adopt, as policy, a fixed asset capitalization threshold of
$1,000.
RCTC Meeting Agenda
April 14, 1999
Page 5
6C5. Auditor Management Letter Page 87
Overview
This item .is for the Commission to receive and file.
6C6. Single Signature Authority Report Page 90
Overview
This item is for the Commission to receive and file.
6C7. Group 70 Protective Services and Investigations Contract Page 92
Overview
This item is for the Commission to approve, subject to legal counsel
review, a contract for security services with Group 70 Protective Services.
6C8. Increase in Contract for Financial Advisory Services Page 100
Overview
This item is for the Commission to authorize the Executive Director to
execute an amendment to the contract with Charles Bell Securities Corp.,
in joint venture with Boyea Capital Markets in the amount of $70, 000 (total
contract value of $145,000) through June 30, 1999 for completion of
Phase 1 of the Strategic Plan.
6D. CONSENT CALENDAR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
6D1. Extension of Office Lease Page 102
Overview
This item is for the Commission to extend RCTC's office lease for two
years and to develop a Request for Qualification to review the office needs
and location.
RCTC Meeting Agenda
April 14, 1999
Page 6
7. COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION ACCEPTABILITY
PROCESS (CETAP) CONTRACT Page 103
5 MINUTES
Overview
This item is to provide status on the CETAP contract with final approval scheduled to be
held at the RCTC's Special Meeting on April 26, 1999.
8. TiER ll STATION ANALYSIS 8 RECOMMENDATIONS Page 105
10 MINUTES
Overview
This item is for the Commission to: 1) approve the Tier ll Station Analysis and
Recommendations Report; 2) proceed with initial development of rail stations at Van
Buren Boulevard in Riverside and near Main Street in Corona, including preliminary
engineering, cost analysis, design, and identification of and negotiation for necessary
real property; 3) pursue funding partnerships with the cities of Riverside and Corona,
especially in the areas of improved vehicular access and waiver of fees and
assessments; 4) seek additional property adjacent to the La Sierra Station for expanded
parking; 5) secure the cooperation of Metrolink and Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Railroad; 6) initiate the appropriate funding applications and allocations from State and
Federal agencies.
9. FY2000-03 Congestion Mitigation 8 Air Quality Improvement Program Page 110
10 MINUTES
Overview
This item is for the Commission to: 1) approve the proposed project selection criteria;
2) establish a Clean Fuels Opportunity Fund with $2 million in CMAQ reserved to
support this program; and 3) direct staff to proceed with the Call for Projects in the
SCAB area.
10. Revised Budget/Fiscal Year 1998-1999 Page 114
5 MINUTES
Overview
This item is for the Commission to approve the revisions to the budget for fiscal year
ending June 30, 1999 with total budgeted expenditures of $100, 027, 639.
RCTC Meeting Agenda
April 14, 1999
Page 7
11. FISCAL YEAR 2000 Goals 8 Objectives Page 138
10 MINUTES
Overview
This item is for the Commission to approve the revisions to the original seven guiding
principles (i.e. policy goals) and adopt the eighth guiding principle; and approve the
Commission objective and department goals and objectives for FY2000.
12. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
13. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
14. ADJOURNMENT
The May meeting of the Commission will be held in Hemet at the Hemet
Neighborhood Center, 305 E. Devonshire Avenue, Stage Room, Hemet.
SUPERVISOR TOM MULLEN
FIFTH DISTRICT
Riverside County Transportation Commission
3560 University Avenue, Suite 100
Riverside, California 92501
TO WHO IT MAY CONCERN:
April 5, 1999
This letter is to verify that John Tavaglione is authorized to vote on my behalf at the regular
meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, as well as its Executive
Committee meeting, on Wednesday, April 14, 1999.
Sincerely,
TOM MULLEN
Riverside County Supervisor
5th District
TM:nmr
COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER • FOURTEENTH FLOOR • 4080 LEMON STREET • P.O. BOX 1645 • RIVERSIDE, CA 92502-1645
TELEPHONE (909) 955-1050 • FAx (909) 955-9030 • INTERNET: district5@co.riverside.ca.us
3RD DISTRICT
J 1M VENABLE
THIRD DISTRICT SUPERVISOR
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STAFF
RICK HOFFMAN, LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT
MARY MORELAND, LEGISLATIVE ASSISTANT
VALERIE CHASE, EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
ELAINE JOHNSON, BOARD ASSISTANT
NANCY MATCH, BOARD ASSISTANT
April 7, 1999
Riverside County Transportation Commission
3560 University Avenue, Suite 100
Riverside, California 92501
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter is to verify that John Tavaglione is authorized to vote on my behalf at the
regular meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission, as well as its
Executive Committee meeting on Wednesday, April 14, 1999.
JV:vc
Sincerely,
Jim Venable
Supervisor
Third District
P.O. BOX 1486 • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502-1486 • 909-275-1030
DATE:
NAME:
PUBLIC MEETING
IF YOU WISH TO TESTIFY AT THIS MEETING,
PLEASE FILL OUT THIS CARD AND PRESENT IT
TO A RCTC STAFF MEMBER
2/---/q47-
SUBJECT: � �/
ADDRESS: e/Ls--- vl/ - 52/x-ih, PHONE:
IF YOU ARE REPRESENTING AN ORGANIZATION PLEASE LIST:
NAME: � � � PHONE: �6.-2424
aztyk.
ADDRESS:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
3560 University Ave., Ste. 100 o Riverside, CA 92501 0 (714)787-71741
�J
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON
MINUTES
March 10, 1999
1. CALL TO ORDER.
Chairman Jack van Haaster called the meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission
to order at 9:00 a.m. at the UCR Chancellors Conference Room, 1201 University Avenue, Suite 207,
Riverside, California 92507.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT ALTERNATES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT
PRESENT
Gene Bourbonnais
Bob Buster
Percy L. Byrd
John M. Chlebnik
Alex Clifford
Juan M. DeLara
Frank Hall
John Hunt
Dick Kelly
William G. Kleindienst
Jan Lela*
Stan Lisiewicz
Tom Mullen
Kevin W. Pace
John J. Pena
Greoory S. Pettis
Andrea M. Puaa
Doua Sherman
Chris B. Silva
Jim Smedley
John F. Tavaalione
Jack van Haaster
James A. Venable
Frank West
Roy Wilson
Donald F. Yokaitis
Jeff Comerchero
Robert Crain
Al Landers
Robin Reeser Lowe**
* Arrived after start of meeting.
**Received a note from Commissioner Lowe. Unable to attend meeting because of delayed departure
from Washington D.C. because of weather conditions. Commissioner Ron Roberts was also in
Washington, D.C.
2. SELF INTRODUCTIONS OF COMMISSIONERS.
A round table introductions of Commissioners followed. (A sign in sheet of other attendees is
attached to the minutes.)
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS.
Garry A. Grant, representing Meadowbrook and RCVC, presented testimony in opposition of
extending Measure "A" or any additional tax.
RCTC Minutes
March 10, 1999
Page 2
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
M/S/C (Kleindienst/Silva) approve the minutes of the February 10, 1999, meeting as
submitted.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR.
M/S/C (Clifford/Buster) approve the Consent Calendar as follows:
5A. CONSENT CALENDAR - EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ITEM.
5A1. 1999 RALPH M. BROWN ACT.
Receive and file, the 1999 Brown Act.
5B. CONSENT CALENDAR - PLANS AND PROGRAMS COMMITTEE ITEM.
5131. TRANSFER OF CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION SERVICE AGENCY (CTSA)
FUNCTION FROM SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY TO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS OF
THE DESERT
Approve the transfer of the Consolidated Transportation Service Agency (CTSA)
designation in the Coachella Valley from SunLine Transit Agency to Community
Partnerships of the Desert.
5C. CONSENT CALENDAR - BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE ITEMS.
5C1. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORTS
Receive and file the Combining Statements of Revenues and Expenditures and
Changes in Fund Balances (Unaudited) and the Highway and Rail Projects quarterly
budget report for the Quarter ending December 31, 1998.
5C2. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY FOR CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT NO. RO-9847 FOR CONSTRUCTION AND SOUND WALLS ON SR 91
BETWEEN VAN BUREN BOULEVARD AND MARY STREET IN THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE
Authorize the increase of the project construction contingency by $40,000 for
Construction Contract No. RO-9847 from $113,514 to $153,514. The new not to
exceed value of the contract will be $2,640.000.
5C3. RAIL STATION SECURITY
To contract directly for security services at its four rail station sites and authorize
staff to develop the necessary procurement documents including an -appropriate scope
of work.
5C4. QUARTERLY CALL BOX UPDATE
Receive and file the quarterly call box update, as presented.
RCTC Minutes
March 10, 1999
Page 3
6. FEDERAL APPROPRIATIONS LIST.
David Shepherd, Director of Intergovernmental Affairs, explained that this was a wish list to obtain
federal funding for various projects. Staff compiled this list based on project readiness and possibility
to receive funding.
Commissioner Tom Mullen stated that the list also include the CETAP project.
In response to Commissioner Jim Smedley's question relating to the $5 million limit as the Route 79
project would be more than the limit, David Shepherd stated that the determination was made based
on the amount of available funds and the opportunity to receive funds for this area.
Eric Haley, Executive Director, added that the House Appropriations Committee is set against having
any funds around. Congressmembers Ken Calvert and Ron Packard have asked for input on what we
would like if that changes at some point through the process. We are committed, not only to go for
projects during the reauthorization every six years, to have projects in readiness state for every annual
appropriation cycle. The chances are less than one in four that there will be any action at all in this
area, this just builds on our successes last time. $5 million is a reasonable target.
Corky Larson, Executive Director of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), said
that although the projects listed under the Coachella Valley area are what would have been chosen
by CVAG. In the future, CVAG would first like to approve the list
Chairman van Haaster concurred with Corky Larson that CVAG should have had the opportunity to
review and concur with the submitted list.
M/SIC (Mullen/Wilson) that the Commission direct staff to work with RCTC's federal
advocate to obtain funding for the projects listed in this report, including the CETAP
projects, and provide input/suggestions to include any additional projects.
7. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE.
Commissioner Andrea Puga asked about the position on SB 63,.reducing the minimum occupancy for
the El Monte Busway from 3 + to 2 + , David Shepherd explained that this legislation requiring
Caltrans to convert the El Monte Busway to 2+ conflicts with the existing Caltrans Districy 7
agreement with the LAMTA. Before an arbitrary decision is made, there should be some consultation
with that local agency with regard to that agreement.
Eric Haley stated that in discussions yesterday in Sacramento, the Assembly staff and chairman are
taking the entire package of HOV bills and setting them aside for a few weeks to negotiate a broad
statewide approach which gets to Commissioner Puga's comment that the issue is different operating
standards in different parts of the state.
Commissioner Mullen stated that the topography within this county really tests other data. The
Commission should look at the 74/91 or a combination thereof. CECERT could perform the task to
obtain data to support or dispute the policy for HOV lanes.
Commissioner Alex Clifford commented that, to make it clear, this is a local issue.
RCTC Minutes
March 10, 1999
Page 4
MIS/C/ (Tavaglione/Smedley) that the Commission adopt the recommended bill positions, and
receive and file the State and Federal Legislative Updates.
Pape: Nay - AB 38, AB 102
Aye - AB 44, SB 14
8. REPORT ON PROJECTION OF MEASURE A EARNED SALES TAX REVENUES.
Dean Martin, Chief Financial Officer, informed the Commission that in the past and every two years
through the year 2009, RCTC has contracted Ernst & Youngted to provide RCTC with an update on
the projection of Measure A earned sales tax revenues. The forecasted result show Measure A
revenues to be $1,122 million in nominal dollars from 1999 through 2009. The forecast is an
increase of $17 million from the 1996 projection.
M/S/C (Smedley/Puga) to receive and file the report on the projection of Measure A earned
sales tax revenues and approve the use of these projections as the basis for the Phase I of
the Strategic Plan.
9. SB 45 2% PLANNING, PROGRAMMING AND MONITORING ACTIVITIES PLAN AMENDMENT.
In response to Commissioner Buster if the SB 45 2% funds could be used for another purpose in the
future, Eric Haley said yes, however, for this cycle, all available planning funds for the Western
County are being used to support a project study report for Route 79 and for the Community and
Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP). For the Coachella Valley, funds are
used to support project monitoring costs and the 1-10 project study report. For Palo Verde Valley,
funds will be used to conduct a project master plan. Staff will be back to the Commission when the
FY 2000-2006 plan for an updated requested and revised numbers on the remaining four years. At
that time, there will be funds that could be allocated for other purposes.
Corky Larson spoke and informed the Commission of an amendment to CVAG/Palo Verde's list. She
said that CVAG will augment $70,000 to Palo Verde's $30,000 funding for their project master plan.
The total for the Palo Verde Valley project master plan will be $100,000.
M/S/C (Wilson/Mullen) to approve:
1. $244,471 of SB 45 2% Plannina. Proarammina and Monitoring funds to support the
SB 45 staff position for fiscal year 2003 and 2004:
2. $253.782 of SB 45 2% Plannina. Proarammina and Monitoring funds to support
CVAG Proiect Monitorina Activities for FY 1999-2004:
3. $100,000 to conduct a Proiect Master Plan in the Palo Verde Valley ($70.000 CVAG
and $30,000 Palo Verde Valley SB 45 2% Planning, Programming and Monitoring
funds):
4. $175.000 of SB 45 2% Plannina. Proarammina and Monitorina funds to support an
1-10 lane addition Proiect Study Report in the Coachella Valley: and
5. Reserve the balance of olannina funds available in the Coachella Valley 0114.637)
and the Palo Verde Valley ($2,077) for future Transportation Project Prioritization
uses.
6. Authorize staff to proceed with the necessary administrative requirements to process
a STIP amendment to program PPM funds consistent with current and prior
Commission actions.
RCTC Minutes
March 10, 1999
Page 5
10. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO PRODUCE FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR FUTURE NORTH SOUTH
CORRIDORS BETWEEN 1-10 AND SR 60 BETWEEN 1-15 AND I-215.
Paul Blackwelder stated that a $100,000 study was previously authorized by the Commission. This
is to provide better north/south connectivity between the I-10 and State Route 60 corridors between
1-15 and 1-215. The current proposal is for RCTC and SanBAG to split the funding on a 50/50 basis
and that SanBAG's 50% share be further split with the City of Fontana. It is envisioned that RCTC
would be the lead agency for the project with participation from the City of Fontana and SanBAG and
development team members include planners from the County of Riverside, Caltrans and adjacent
cities. He noted that at a Committee meeting, there was a request to consider a similar study
between 1-10 and Route 60 in Moreno Valley.
Commissioner Puga requested if Corona could participate in the planning meetings.
Commissioner Smedley confirmed that these would be arterials and not high speed connectors and
the cities will conjoin with the County in getting these arterials through. He has a concern because
Highway 79 is a major connector between the 1-15 and 1-10 in the southern part of the County and
they are having difficulty securing funding that.
Eric Haley explained that the north/south study is a fatal flaw analysis of a variety of ground options.
At this time, there is no funding proposal as it is not certain corridors will be proposed. It would be
jointly funded by San Bernardino County interests as well as RCTC. There are several steps before
this becomes a proposal. In no way does it gain the stature of a Measure A core project which Route
79 is, and does not compete for the same source of funding.
Commissioner Alex Clifford asked what happens to the report when complete and how would it fit
into the strategic plan. Paul Blackwelder responded that between Route 60 and 1-10, there are land
that are not currently developed that could be used to put a roadway through. A general plan
amendment could be done so that when development comes in, they would be required to contribute
to that connection.
In response to Commissioner Clifford if this would be like a Highway 71 situation, Paul Blackwelder
indicated that the roads are already 2-4 lane roads. The object will be if they can be extended
through the mountainous area and provide some relief for 1-215 and 1-15. This is a fatal flaw 'analysis
and there may be environmental issues, or other issues that show that connection could not be done
with 3 out of 4 corridors. For local planning, that information is just as important as knowing where
a road might go.
Commissioner John Tavaglione asked if it would be possible to continue this item for one month and
suggested that a map of the area being studied would be helpful to the Commission.
Chairman van Haaster noted that this item was reviewed by the Committee and there was a
unanimous vote.
Eric Haley stated that staff will provide the Commission with a map. He requested that the
Cofmmissioners contact him if they wish to provide input as to participating agencies.
M/S/C (Hunt/Kelly) direct staff to:
RCTC Minutes
March 10, 1999
Page 6
1. Prepare a Reauest for Proposal to Produce a Feasibility Study for Future North South
Arterial Corridors between 1-10 and SR-60 between 1-15 and 1-215. Staff will
evaluate the proposals received and brina back a recommendation for contract award
to the selected firm that produces the proposal favored by the selection process. The
selection team will be composed of members reoresentina RCTC. SANBAG. County
of Riverside, City of Fontana and others as deemed appropriate by RCTC staff.
2. Explore the possibility of fundina and support for a similar corridor study in the
Moreno Valley Area connectina 1-10 with State Route 60 and brina a new item back
to the Plans and Programs Committee for review and possible action.
11. MEASURE A COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM EVALUATION SURVEY REQUEST FOR
PROPOSAL.
Tanya Love, Program Manager, stated that Commuter Assistance Program has been in existence
since 1991, with the same contractor managing that program since that time. Contract will go out
for bid in July or August and staff proposes an effectiveness study prior to that time to determine
what changes should be made in the Commuter Assistance Program.
Commissioner Clifford asked if the results of the study would quantify some cost benefit analysis and
Tanya Love explained that this was done at the staff level and using the same formula that the Mobile
Source Review Committee has used. This could be part of the evaluation study.
Andrea Puga asked if SanBAG was assisting with the costs and Tanya Love stated that SanBAG
will pay for their portion of the Effectiveness Study.
M/S/C (Hall/Kleindienst) to authorize staff to: 11 develop and issue a Reauest for Proposal for
a Measure A Commuter Assistance Program Evaluation Survey: 21 rate the RFP's by a
committee comprised of two RCTC Commissioners, two RCTC staff members. two SANBAG
staff members and possibly two SanBAG Board members: and. 31 present a recommendation
on selecting a firm to conduct the work at a future Commission meeting.
12. PRESENTATION - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (SCIA) SYSTEM.
San Bernardino County 1st District Supervisor Kathy Davis thanked the Commission for scheduling
this item on their agenda. Some months ago, both counties suffered by the closures of military
installations. In San Bernardino County, Norton and George Air Force Base were closed. Her district
represents the high desert - an area of 18,000 sq mi. When the bases closed, the communities came
together to determine what the bases could be used for and how to promote them. Presentations
were made throughout San Bernardino, to business community groups, and others to look at aviation
needs. An Aviation Task Force has been formed and a resolution looking at regional aviation and to
develop an airport system in Southern California was brought forward. Adoption of the resolution is
important so that staff, using direction from policymakers secure future funding through the
transportation cycle. The presentation today will focus on the air cargo market.
Jon Roberts, Southern California International Airport Director, stated that when George Air Force
Base closed in 1992, the found themselves embroiled in a base acquisition effort. The final 2,000
acres were transferred to Victorville two years ago. During that time, a study was done to determine
what role the facility might play in the Southern California aviation system. It was clear early on that
they would not be a significant player in the airline passenger industry but identified other areas that
RCTC Minutes
March 10, 1999
Page 7
they may be able to participate: 1) aircraft maintenance; and, 2) air cargo. Because adequate data
is needed to understand and evaluate this industry, RMJ and Associates were hired for the study.
He then presented Richard Jannise of RMJ and Associates.
ORichard Janisse provided a slide presentation on the Southern California Airport System. He
reviewed: 1) Southern California's growth forecast; 2) regional employment trends; 3) 2020
passenger boarded forecast vs. airport capacity; and, 4) 2020 air cargo forecast vs. airport capacity.
The conclusions were: 1) for Los Angeles and Los Angeles International Airport - a) congestion and
transit times become unreasonable; b) creating more capacity exacerbates the access problems; and,
c) need efficient truck and rail access to seaports; 2) for Inland Empire Growth - a) population and
jobs double; b) manufacturing and transportation increase; c) transportation infrastructure
requirements increase; 3) for airport system - a) passenger boarding forecast exhausts airport
capacity; b) air cargo forecast requires SBI, March and SCIA capacity. The recommendation was
to establish an initiative to develop a spec plan to capitalize on the opportunity. Specific
recommendations were: 1) SanBAG - develop a specific plan to accommodate growth forecast;
develop a specific regional plan for airports and air cargo, and develop an infrastructure improvement
plan; 2) SCAG - expedite the aviation task force analysis; and, develop a cost effective regional air
cargo and airport plan; and, 3) the issues include Inland Empire truck and rail access to seaports,
Inland Empire truck and rail infrastructure improvements, Cajon Pass truck and rail capacity increases,
a regional airports and air cargo plan, public and private sector funding sources, and FAA funding for
SBI, March and SCIA.
Commissioner Mullen thanked Supervisor Davis and staff for the presentation. It is important to
understand each County's position as relates to transportation and the impact of the proposed
expansion of LAX. It does not make sense to pump 515 billion at one end of the basin for an
expansion and then funnel the 30 million people that are going to be into this basin over the next 20
years down very few corridors that we have and say nothing of the 150 million in passengers. There
needs to be a region wide solution to a very serious problem.
Eric Haley commented that the Commission will be receiving requests from a bi-county steering group
that Supervisor Davis is heading for resolutions by the policy boards. It is important to bring
forward a united Inland Empire approach to turning SCAG staff around through the general assembly
voting process. He requested that the cities/county agendized the resolution as soon as possible.
Supervisor Davis reminded Commissioners that it is also important that the members attend and vote.
13. ITEMS PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR.
There were no items pulled from the Consent Calendar.
14. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND COMMISSIONERS REPORTS
A. Commissioner Stan Lisiewicz informed the Commission that Caltrans was in the process of
developing and will be sending out a customer satisfaction survey. He requested that the
survey be completed and returned.
B. Commissioner Buster asked Legal Counsel to look at the issue of whether or not, in response
to CPTC's lawsuit against Caltrans that would ban the construction of the merging lanes from
Green River to Coal Canyon, RCTC can limit or ask Caltrans to prevent CPTC's use of the
merging lane from Highway 71 to the Orange County Line in order to get on the toll road.
RCTC Minutes
March 10, 1999
Page 8
C. Commissioner Don Yokaitis asked the situation on Route 60 through Riverside where it
narrows down to two lanes. Paul Blackwelder explained that widening that section is part
of the 1-215 improvement project scheduled to start in 2001. To proceed with the project,
it must be widened to get two lanes coming in, requires widening the railroad bridge and to
go outside the existing right-of-way and it has to go through an environmental process.
Commissioner Lisiewicz added that Ca!trans has been involved with the Commission staff for
several years attempting to get an Environmental Impact Statement through the Federal
Highway Administration to improve the entire section from the east interchange to the west
interchange.
D. Commissioner Roy Wilson stated that: 1) the SCAQMD seat on the California Air Resources
Board is currently vacant. There is an opportunity for us to get an Inland Empire member to
fill that seat if we could get strong united support from all of the cities as well as perhaps
RCTC; and, 2) the unmet transit needs hearing was held on March 4th. He and Commissioner
Bob Crain of Blythe were the hearing board.
At this time, Commissioner Mullen requested that the California Air Resources Board SCAQMD seat
vacancy be added to the agenda as a latebreaking item as the Commissioners were just made aware
of the vacancy.
M/S/C (Mullen/Buster) to add the California Air Resources Board vacancy on the agenda as
a latebreaking item.
14D1. VACANT SCAQMD SEAT ON THE CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD
Commissioner Wilson suaaested that the Commission nominate Mayor Ron Loveridge
of Riverside to fill the SCAQMD seat on the California Air Resources Board. Mayor
Loveridge has been a member of the SCAQMD Board for a number of years.
M/S/C (Mullen/Buster) that the Commission endorse the nomination of Mayor
Ron Loveridge for SCAQMD and direct the Executive Director to prepare a
nomination letter for the Chair's signature to Governor Gray Davis and to
encourage the cities and County to support Mayor Loveridge.
E. Commissioner Mullen indicted that he and Eric Haley met with Cliff Madison, RCTC's
Washington Lobbyist, in Washington last week regarding the CETAP project to obtain $4+
million from TEA 21 funds, which is a program designed to support this type of community
planning process so that it does not take away from other projects. Cliff Madison did an
outstanding job.
Commissioner Smedley stated that the CETAP process is unique and it is very unusual getting
environmentalists on board. He then asked if there is anyway that the RCTC lobbyist get
priority for federal projects that have completed the environmental process. Commissioner
Mullen stated that the idea was to get support for this out of this particular program, over six
years. Once done, the projects are shelf ready. It is advantageous for jurisdictions to have
their projects shelf ready, for TEA 21 in order to move the projects along.
RCTC Minutes
March 10, 1999
Page 9
F. Chairman van Haaster indicated that the Commission has and should become more visible this
year, and start educating the public about what Measure A is, what it was, what it
accomplished and where we want to go. There will be presentations before different groups.
He requested that Commissioners interested in the process and making presentations before
groups contact him.
G. Chairman van Haaster explained that Item #15 was a closed session of the Executive
Committee. The Committee is in the process of evaluating the Executive Director. He
requested that if the Commissioners have any input/comments to send it to him at the
Commission office marked "Confidential".
H. Eric Haley informed the Commission that Captain Towle of the California Highway Patrol has
agreed to provide some special long term enforcement along Route 74. This was at the
request of Commissioners Mullen, Buster, Landers and Pape. He expects that there will be
a public announcement.
15. ADJOURNMENT
There being no other items before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 10:39 a.m. The
next meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission is scheduled to be held on
Wednesday, April 14, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. at the University of California Chancellor's Conference
Room.
Respectfully submitted,
Nat Y Kophaver
Clerk of a Board
RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON
CHANCELLOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM, UNIVERSITY VILLAGE
1201 University Avenue, Suite 207, Riverside, CA 92507
NAME _
joH Cr/ L etivi K
> JPye Z57,5 e e. Q/S
%'Rer" Pe-777 S
p ni Dfa; A I°t/c
) 7YXd 2 -(f"-It
r<ieve 0) ,
FA-44/A- A/E___ s 7`
�2d1/k Atrfc_ z-
)44axi-,Ak
10 rJ •tea F . y O KR- f-t-c 5.
Signing is not required
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 10, 1999
9:00 A.M.
SIGN -IN SHEET
AGENCY
TELEPHONE /FAX NUMBER
X-LI P-Pse**)5x,-6‘
•
C fry ,r` CAL I ri Esc►
C.Ty ofa.,yon Ln/l�e
airy of NnieD/2u C. CAI
e AD0 N/-
eiht of -
or
(9017ys--1'99_9 I (9,90 79r-�tyy
(9e9)Z44-729.5/
1.0) $33 - so 4.40
j. 7 pa-73
2- 9 4 5.,///
elL6) "177 - 7coo
(-YIP7)70 3" I
I no) 32.1- mses7
/ 73 7,Zo8Sr
/ 777--7101
7-7-1-70t
�o 7- 9S s M 3p
--l/
CO7y A/Z- F09,7r3 .
/
''-r4• 3 0 3
735 -P-i9 0 /
pcAikrvn rAve5s el‘o 3ti3 824,0 / '14.0'2•023 b14:11
/L 711•J C tto r»
-?tcl Q r; q ��� / 746 q�3 V9o!,"'
?6o- 3a /--./ !a 3f
RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 10, 1999
SIGN -IN SHEET (Page 2)
NAME
J / /11 G/14I
,- i-r t I r C ('I •
5/'c •
�3 �u5 T�fZ
t fah(14
,z2li(L 1.4A'v /4v1"
►11
i
ti,,f1.1
-40-Ar-)
�� c ►- a
-N)d,.D, 0_11�
�5,„J ,b,2-�&-Z/5o,./ `
pAy%/ ..5
��r� �� ✓� w ijifrivtlti r
AGENCY
C'd-y 0 r ,v-:y
-J rJ -.T, 1, /,;-ro
vr, C C
Coe t-Frame, s
g_ c
it?
If2AJLN7
r
RCTO
Signing is not required
TELEPHONE /FAX NUMBER
- ti9/
zA y_ <-7a c:
3B; -4-iU5"5-
9s s • 4P/o
9076E6-/4, D
78'7-71 pry
??;9472V7k2-
/ /J !? - /
/
/ 70y6,Y6 3073
l9�- 00 - 941 c
It f - yr-f-Au:AI Sfr--- .. - -
905'-7—773Sai z-o
(-704,1 3) J 3:-‘
3'57 Yac�
Rq7 -7-1 `1 1 /
7 87 - 71 `1 1
/
/2K 9/�I
/ 989- �gao
Lt
/
L•
�627/e E,7,/ eerm p 9�a -6a42S / 932- d'APH
RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CHANCELLOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM, UNIVERSITY VILLAGE
1201 University Avenue, Suite 207, Riverside, CA 92507
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 10, 1999
9:00 A.M.
PLEASE SIGN IN
IF YOU WISH TO PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, PLEASE
COMPLETE AND SUBMIT A TESTIMONY CARD TO THE CLERK OF THE
COMMISSION
NAME AGENCY TELEPHONE /FAX NUMBER
i/sy R.R(_.*7a rah✓iJ qb 9 /6 7-9?)9
Pi
Aa-A z <vSS
c Ian rat DC-tj I -e
S C 6/0 D (909) y6 _2998 / (909) 396 - 363 9
C.,4
Cot.` }-ramt-\/
c-t&
K T)ffr
L I N u5,-i -�,',,,..,,s Q .1- C A s C,
/<,(� r<< �� /e.2 VA /27:4-
_1 %111-ice ‘.. l U- _ o it, ciii
CC"( v /( -- i ci r c.,r1,--) C
C J (i ,
1-\\,,,\ 1 c,-T1 Q
--'1 AAJP, c -,c's-C-0i3 c A U -1-- Rink S
f-)4//s A)?/Jer)
!-<(--v, /
Signing is not required
Gu
i3e y'� �y
l c7C 3Trr/Y A1`v °g.- / 17g-..7.7'# )
OP9) ?1/,- 51-Yeo /
C9c9 333409
(V') 413-3(co /
C lg51- /
/
��•7 -0(0 I / 1(63 -oi Cff
/&-/ 6 l EP7-/C70 �
, 7C 720,3 /
/
—Roo 346 II?-1 / Woo S40 Sc)4-9
2 I / 101
9()
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 10, 1999
SIGN -IN SHEET (Page 2)
IF YOU WISH TO PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION, PLEASE COMPLETE AND
SUBMIT A TESTIMONY CARD TO THE CLERK OF THE COMMISSION
NAME AGENCY TELEPHONE /FAX NUMBER .
r/
�rim kJw2wer )-lam6rcitp gag,-giy-/7.6% i���--ti, y---7/.zg7
1
-,-e,wiav Li. 6.0.___rvi -Tti-g Clutf,u c,,,_„, ralAymi . W5- `f33-v27n iLiS- ""'",z-S2-i‘,,
/
Signing is not required
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
April 14, 1999
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Plans and Programs Committee
Bill Hughes, Bechtel Project Manager
THROUGH:
Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Request for Proposals to perform the Project Study Report/Project
Report and Environmental Studies for the State Route 79
At the October 14, 1998 RCTC meeting, the Commission approved an amount of
$425,000 from the SB 45 2% planning funds to perform a Project Study Report
(PSR)/Project Report (PR) and environmental studies to realign State Route 79 near
the Cities of Hemet and San Jacinto between Ramona Expressway and Domenigoni
Parkway (see attached map). The Cities of Hemet, San Jacinto and the County of
Riverside are all desirous to proceed with the project at the earliest possible time.
The above agencies have requested that RCTC act as lead agency for this project.
Their letters are attached for your information. We will work with Caltrans in an
effort to make the funds expended on the PSR/PR and Environmental Studies eligible
to count as local match for the future federal demonstration funds earmarked for
engineering and right of way.
Staff recommends that the Commission put out a request for proposals from
consultants who would be qualified to prepare a combined Project Study
Report/Project Report along with the necessary environmental documents that will be
required to clear the project for final design.
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
$425,000 .
Source of Funds
SB45 2% planning funds
.{<:,; ::.......::.:.r........:...r,:..r.:.:::.':.Y::::::::............•..........,.................................:{::.}:::Y:::::.�::Y�:::t•-::::..:.;:.::..:.:::.....::...:.......,...�
h iv.vn'w;:?'Y..{n.}m:.t4,... .,,i,.; 1:..
•...v.; •,.{- .. r.{... ..} •', i......:.
Y• j•{.r:,.: ,.
...v.,.:.}..::ti:i.•:x::-...•...::r..4::p'vr :. •:.,•..... .. .. ... .•.4.{-$:•.
... tYY:}<#'fi:. ::: }•., v:Y:... E.. qq
•.t aq vt, ,
.>rr}•t•.f,' '... r}:.,.Vi,•,:...%1• :.•. ry`4
.. ,.:.,•.. :'+."#`'£ C.�.' • : ,..,•::....r .. ?f''.E..#k. 's:.
:4.; .•.} , ., • : S• . ., f:.. ., x ... }. $3ifY' r":7{�FF;
...::?:. r.....::sc.:}.............:.:`�,.}.......................::}.rki,........
•.:: }i}:: }iY}Y:t{{t.}
...: .....i.:.: ..
' . -rr'.:
.... F.:•ii'.f, .:.E:,;.
..................
.. }}:•Y}}':{•}h:}; i'.:.Y}:::::::: }':::!.vn ; :•::: :!i•• .
r':. YY..:}:4r•}}...vk{{{:•i}rYY:h?:ter'-}}Y}Yi-:::{�;:}•FFF:•::
:{:......i.v..:..::: :Y't�:
vF: .�:::'{: F;{_�};2Y:2Yc.
::b t S :;:h, .:..:u.: ;$2�;;,;';. .,.,.
•:%:iX%::'??FFF:' ;Y.Yy t::.:YYY-t,•: .. £.: ..s
...... ,.. r..:....:.: :Fiy:
..,.::::.� ::^....::,:...:.:... :.}}r::.r:.}:•x:<rr}}:}:.- :-::.,-.�:tt;r.,.r:}<:F»:: ::FFF;:;:i:r-;.r.};•:.:..
... ................ ..#:: .. .mot.. ..£..
..
}•: n'::r:Y .. {�.F..
r.
. w.
. {:..>..,.;•.
F:r:a..+;•s. . a
..,t r.�.3:; ..�c:s'n.'
Included in Fiscal Year Budget
y
Year
Included in Program Budget
y
Year Programed
Approved Allocation
Year of Allocation
Budget Adjustment Required
n
Financial Impact Not Applicable
00J031
PLANS & PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Direct staff to issue a request for proposals to qualified engineering and environmental
firms to prepare a Project Study Report/Project Report and environmental impact
report for the State Route 79 realignment project in the Cities of Hemet and San
Jacinto. Staff will form a selection panel consisting of the Cities of Hemet, San
Jacinto, County of Riverside, Ca!trans, and RCTC Staff. The selection panel will
review the submitted proposals, rank the firms to form a short list, interview the
short-listed firms and bring back a recommendation to the Commission for the
selected firm or firms to perform the above task.
000002
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
April 14, 1999
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Plans and Programs Committee
Tanya Love, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Proposed SB 836 Voluntary Rideshare Program for the Inland
Empire Region
In 1997, through a partnership with San Bernardino Associated Governments,
$398,110 in SB 836 grant funds were received to implement three projects serving
Inland Empire commuters and employers. Final results of these three projects should
be available in mid-1999. Based on the projected success of the 1997 SB 836
projects, the Commission and SANBAG again partnered for grant funds and were
awarded $268,654 through SB 836 funds for an additional demonstration project.
These funds reflect another avenue through which the Commission continues to
leverage its established program funding with other private and public resources.
Under SB 836, the Regional Transportation Agencies Coalition (RTAC) was designated
as the responsible entity for implementation of voluntary rideshare projects. To fund
the effort, SB 836 required that the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) allocate $1.5 million annually. SB 836 relieves employers having 100 to
249 employees at work sites from complying with SCAQMD's Rule 2202. SB 836
mandated the implementation of demonstration rideshare projects to determine if
equivalent emission reductions could be achieved through voluntary efforts with
employers having Jess than 250 employees in comparison to reductions generated
under Rule 2202 regulation.
The proposed project known as "Keys to the Future" will combine two of the SB 836
1997 projects into one. The new comprehensive commute project is designed to
motivate drive alone commuters, working at small work sites with less than 250
employees, to begin ridesharing and will be comprised of three elements:
1) Survey Element:
The employee transportation survey is the cornerstone of the regional database
and provides essential information from which to market and implement
additional TDM strategies and commuter incentive programs. The focus will
000003
be on employers in the Inland Empire who have not implemented a match list
survey for the past 18 months or employers who have terminated their
rideshare efforts as a result of Rule 2202 or SB 836.
2) Incentive Element:
The project will provide an incentive of up to $2.00 per day for three
consecutive months in local merchant gift certificates for every day a new
ridesharer uses an alternative mode of transportation to work..
_3) Team Ride Element:
This element recognizes and rewards employees who continue to rideshare for
six months or more by providing unlimited discounts at restaurants and
entertainment venues.
SANBAG, who contracts with RCTC for the delivery of their Commuter Assistance
Program, has requested that RCTC be the lead agency on behalf of the Inland Empire
for implementation of the 1998 SB 836 project.
Financial Assessment
Project Cost
$268,654
Source of Funds
SB 836
:.:.:.:::::.:.:.::::::::.:.::::::::.:.+... ,........
.: w: }' .v.:; •{•}}}♦w:4r v4.
.::{i ..+..vv........ 4n;.
................. :•.vn.::: }:i•:v...:. :....v :. }.{ n \.+} };hT,.,-,-.
:::::::::::::::::...........w:.v:.:v:;;}}:{:{^:{•}: x:::: nv+.,, ..; +..• .+}.:.
.•. }.::
rn.. r...... r...........
.... �..:..:.::.:::.:..::::........:::.:.:::.:.::::...
4:{.}:4;.}•4: •}'4}:....
r.. i.+
n:�... .. :::'.
...:
...:....:.::.....:.:..:.:::::::::....:::::r.
.....'i 'n: vi •r{.:G}:4' is }:•}:4 ....•, ..,y;.::.4....: •:{{: .
ii.:i0. rk+. fry :.. Tvk++: ]:}.}.0:jiji}'r,:jt:i`i::'ti.{i>.:fi:{.:vi:::::}:i
;•}}:P}}•::•}YnK.i'>:{:{:?};:{:<it}:{.::fii:h+,..?l.. M, .{..
.. .....v:...::. .. i•:.v.. •.h4 ::.v'; :: •:: w;.
•}..t.•.......+:.. r...v ]:: rirx }}: v:4:•:.\...v:}}:v:::.:: •?. .v$.. r. .v.;•:
.::: vw};4:{{Jr}}y}:•::r.iv:{•}:kvrr}::>•}}:•}:4:•:4}:•]: }:: `........::::{::;i;4:v :w.�:::::: r.v.:
:i
:.}r}:
:?:i).
�;:•}i. •#v {:ti:.}:• T
•.y::v; y::n:4•.}:}.:+..r•'•{p.
"'{•,v.•
'v41}
'•\}•v}}
Included in Fiscal Year Budget
N
Year
Included in Program Budget
N
Year. Programmed
Approved Allocation
Year of Allocation
Budget Adjustment Required
N
Financial Impact Not Applicable
PLANS & PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission authorize staff to: 1) approve the SB 836 1998 project detailed
in the attached scope; 2) accept lead agency responsibilities, as requested by
SANBAG; and, 3) after review by legal counsel execute an agreement with Southern
California Associated Governments for implementation of the project as well as
entering into an agreement with the Commission's TDM consultant firm to perform
the work.
000004
ATTACHMENT 1
Revised
3/9/99
1998 SB 836 Proposal
KEYS TO THE FUTURE
The Inland Empire Voluntary Ridesharing Incentive Project
1. Project Description
Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and San Bernardino Associated
Governments (SANBAG) propose the continuation of the "Keys To The Future" umbrella
Project which will combine two of the previous SB 836 projects into one. The new
comprehensive commute reduction Project is designed to motivate drive alone commuters,
working at small employer worksites with less than 250 employees, to begin ridesharing and
will be comprised of three elements.
Survey Element:
Since the South Coast Air Quality Management District's implementation of Rule 2202 in
December 1995 and the passage of SB 836, it is difficult to encourage employers to
voluntarily survey their employees to obtain vital commuting information. The employee
transportation survey is the cornerstone of the regional database and provides essential
information from which to market and implement additional TDM strategies and commuter
incentive programs. Based upon the growing need to: 1) prevent existing employer survey
clients from dropping out of the regional rideshare database, and 2) to encourage new
employer clients to implement the voluntary employee transportation survey, it is proposed
to expand the 1997 SB 836 funded Customized Employer Rideshare Services Project to
provide supplemental survey support. Additional services to be performed by Project staff
on behalf of the employer will include provision of on -site services including: 1) the
distribution and collection of survey forms, 2) review of survey forms for accuracy, 3)
packaging of survey forms to send to SCAG Rideshare for processing, 4) completion of all
instructional forms associated with processing the surveys and 5) provision of
employee/employer survey participation drawings.
Incentive Element:
Building upon and expanding the concept of the 1997 SB 836 I-10 Commute Reduction
Project, the Incentive Element of the proposed Project will be available to all employer
worksites in Riverside and San Bernardino counties with less than 250 employees located
within the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) jurisdiction. The
Project will provide an incentive of up to 52.00 per day for three consecutive months in local
merchant gift certificates for everyday a new ridesharer uses an alternative mode of
transportation to work.
1 _ -
000005
It is proposed that the incentive be available to all employees regardless of home county
origin. The ability to offer incentives to all employees regardless of home county origin will
further entice an employer to participate in the Project.
Team Ride Element:
The Team Ride Element of the I-10 Commute Reduction Project which recognizes and
rewards employees who continue to rideshare on an on -going basis, would be expanded to
include the availability of Team Ride to all San Bernardino County residents who commute
to a qualifying small employer work site.
2. Geographic Region/Corridor/Infrastructure
The Survey and Incentive Elements of the Project target employer work sites with less than
250 employees located in the counties of Riverside and San Bernardino, within the
SCAQMD's jurisdiction. The Team Ride Element of the Project targets all San Bernardino
County residents who commute to employers with less than 250 employees located in the
SCAQMD's jurisdiction.
There are several major commute corridors in the two counties. It is bisected on a
north/south axis by I-15 and I-215, and on a east/west axis by I-10, SR-60 and Highway 91.
Beginning in July 1997, I-10 from the Los Angeles/San Bernardino County line east to the
I-15 is under construction for approximately 2 years. The project includes the construction
of one High Occupancy Vehicle lane in each direction including widening of eight existing
bridge undercrossings, the reconstruction oftwo bridge undercrossings, reconstruction of one
bridge overcrossing and sound walls. The project extends approximately 10 miles along the
I-10 corridor.
Beginning in March 1998, a segment of SR60/I215 from the Valley Way off ramp to
University Avenue in Riverside will be under construction for approximately 24 months. The
project includes the addition of one High Occupancy Vehicle lane in each direction as well
as an additional mixed flow lane. Also included in the project are sound walls, bridge
reconstruction and widening, and interchange realignment.
Recognizing that the majority of Riverside and San Bernardino County commuters travel to
work within the two county sub -region, these construction projects will provide additional
encouragement to commuters to sample ridesharing as one solution to inconveniences caused
by the construction.
3. Origin/Destinations
The destinations of the targeted employees for both the Survey and Incentive Elements of the
Project will be those commuters traveling to an employment site with less than 250
employees located in Riverside County or San Bernardino County. The location of home
2
000006
county origin will not be used as criteria for who qualifies for participation in the Incentive
Element of the Project.
For the Team Ride Element of the Project the county of origin will be used to determine
eligibility. Only those employees residing in San Bernardino County and traveling to work
sites with less than 250 employees within the SCAQMD's jurisdiction will be eligible to
participate.
4. Rideshare Modes
All modes ofridesharing will be targeted for this Project including carpool, vanpool, buspool,
use of public bus or commuter rail, telecommuting, walking or bicycling.
5. Project Incentive Description
In the Survey Element of the Project, incentives will be available to work site employees to
encourage completion and return of the survey form. The incentives provided will be gift
certificates from local merchants and will be awarded through a participation drawing from
those surveys returned at each work site. In addition, the Employer Representative will
become eligible for an incentive gift certificate by achieving a 60% or greater survey response
rate.
The Incentive Element of the Project will provide an incentive of up to $2.00 per day for three
consecutive months in local merchant gift certificates for everyday a new ridesharer uses an
alternative mode of transportation to work. This incentive will be provided to all new
ridesharer, regardless of home county origin, who commute to work sites with less than 250
employees located in the counties of Riverside and San Bernardino.
The only exception to this will be for those Riverside and San Bernardino County work sites
with less than 250 employees who are already an Advantage or Option Rideshare client.
Under this scenario the Project will only pay for their new ridesharer who are not residents
of Riverside or San Bernardino County.
The Team Ride Element of the Project will provide membership to all San Bernardino County
residents who currently rideshare to a work site with less than 250 employees in the
SCAQMD's jurisdiction as a reward and on -going motivation to continue ridesharing. Team
Ride provides an annual membership card good for 20% discounts at local merchants.
6. Project Implementation
RCTC will act as the lead agency to implemem the Project on behalf of the SANBAG and
RCTC partnership. SANBAG and RCTC have worked together for the past four years on
the implementation of Option Rideshare, Advantage Rideshare, Inland Empire Commuter
Services and Club Ride to employers in San Bernardino, Riverside, Los Angeles and Orange
Counties. Collectively recognized as the SANBAG/RCTC Commuter Assistance Programs,
3
000007
RCTC has in turn contracted with a local, private transportation demand management
consulting firm for day to day Project implementation. SANBAG and RCTC retain
collaborative yet independent program oversight responsibilities.
7. Marketing Strategies
Project staff will concentrate their marketing efforts on working directly with work sites with
less than 250 employees to communicate with the primary market - the commuting employee.
RCTC/SANBAG Commuter Assistance Program staff currently have an established working
relationship with many employers in Riverside and San Bernardino counties. Staff -will make
use of a variety of resources to compile a listing of additional employer contacts, including
but not limited to Chambers of Commerce, SCAG Rideshare database, purchased mailing
lists, the SCAQMD database of employers exempted by SB 836 and Inland Empire
Commuter Services database. Existing Keys To The Future marketing materials will require
revision to accommodate the enhanced scope ofthe proposed Survey and Incentive Elements.
Project participation forms will need to be updated.
During the Survey Element of the Project staff will assist with the implementation of the
employee transportation survey process by providing on -site services including the
distribution and collection of survey forms, review of survey forms for accuracy, packaging
of survey forms to send to SCAG Rideshare for processing and the completion of all
instructional forms associated with processing the surveys. The Project will also conduct
participation drawings during the survey process focused on encouraging employee's to
complete and turn in survey forms and heighten their awareness regarding the benefits of
rid esharing.
Staff will rely on a combination of mailings, follow-up telephone calls and one on one
meetings with employers to facilitate participation in the Incentive Element of the Project.
In addition, grass roots marketing targeted directly at the commuting employee may include
the placement of Public Service Announcements (PSA) on local radio, cable television and
movie theater screens. All PSA's will include specific information on program parameters
and eligibility.
8. Existing Efforts/Services
The Project will be implemented in coordination with the services already provided by the
RCTC/SANBAG Commuter Assistance Programs.
As previously noted, Advantage Rideshare and Option Rideshare will continue to provide
incentives to existing employer clients with less than 250 employees for their Riverside
County and San Bernardino County residents respectively.
4
000008
9. Budget/Time Line
The proposed budget for the Project is $268,654. The following provides a breakdown of
the budget by line item:
Line Item
Labor
Expenses
Marketing Materials
Office Supplies
Photocopies
Postage
Certificates/Vouchers
Subsidies
Proposed
Budget
$172, 804
$ 3,500
$ 32,000
$ 1,500
$ 350
$ 15,000
$ 40,000
Mailing Services $ 2,000
5
Line Item
Description,
Includes 216 Program Manager hours,
76 Program Administrator Hours, 2470
Commuter Assistance Representative
hours and.1230 Administrative
Assistant hours.
Includes mileage and incidental
reimbursable expenses.
Includes Project brochures, Team Ride
applications, Team Ride membership
cards, assorted marketing materials and
securing merchants.
Miscellaneous office supplies.
Includes postage for marketing material,
on -going payments for incentives and
postage reply mail costs for Team Ride.
Includes the $2.00/day incentive
program, and survey incentives.
Use of mailing house for direct mail
purposes.
000009
Line Item
Proposed Line Item
Budget Description,
Computer Support/ $ 1,500 Includes computer software and fees for
Maintenance computer progranuner consultant.
TOTAL $268,654
The time line for the Project is based on the assumption that all appropriate contracts will be signed
and funds will be available for program kick-off by July 1, 1998.
Activity Time Line
Project funds transferred from SCAQMD to SCAG. Month 1-2
Appropriate contracts for Project executed.
Develop employer work site target market list: Month 2
Revise Project marketing material and administrative
forms for employer/employee participation to reflect
enhanced services.
Months 2-3
Begin implementation and marketing outreach to employers. Months 4-21
Schedule employer survey dates and assign staff to cover
each survey implementation.
Process employer/employee transportation survey forms
in coordination with SCAG Rideshare
Process incentive payments and mail to employers
Maintain merchant participation in Team Ride discounts
and promotions
Process Team Ride applications and prepare membership
cards and materials.
Prepare and submit eleven bi-monthly reports on Project
progress. •
Prepare final report
6
000010
Months 5-21
Months 5-21
Months 7-23
Months 4 & 16
Months 4-21
On -going
Months 23-24
10. Trips Reduced
The Incentive Element of the Project is projected to attract 360 participants, eliminate 300
vehicles, reduce 28,386 one-way vehicle trips and reduce 559,204 vehicle miles traveled in
a three month period.
The Team Ride Element of the Project is projected to attract 775 members, eliminate 775
vehicles, reduce 122,218 one-way vehicle trips and reduce 2,407,685 vehicle miles traveled
in a three month period.
11. Project Tracking/Quantification
The Survey Element of the Project will track statistical data from each employer survey
implementation. Tracking will include, at a minimum: 1) employers contacted, 2) number of
participating employers, 3) number of surveys processed, 4) number ofRideGuides produced,
and 5) number and type of speciality reports produced and delivered.
The Incentive Element of the Project will track and report those items listed in the Trips
Reduced section of this proposal. The Project will be able to track which employers
participated in the program by a signed Statement of Participation (SOP) between the
employer and RCTC/SANBAG. As a requirement of the SOP, employers will verify the
incentive claim form completed by their respective participating employees. Both the
employer and employee provide signatures on the incentive claim form before incentive
payments are released back to the employer for distribution to their participating employees.
The Team Ride Element of the Project will similarly report those items listed in the Trip
Reduced section of this proposal. The employer will verify the continued rideshare
participation .of Team Ride applicants. Both the employer and employee provide signatures
on the application form before the membership card is sent to the employee.
The formula for tracking and quantifying vehicle trips reduced, miles saved and pounds of
pollutants reduced is based upon the actual commute information provided and verified by
both the employer and employee and will be reported based upon the agreed upon definition
and process of the RTAC.
7
000011
RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
April 14, 1999
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Plans and Programs Committee
Tanya Love, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:.
FY 1999-00 Section 5310 Program, adopt Resolution No. 99-03, '
Certifying Project Consistency With Regional Transportation Plan
The FTA Section 5310 program provides capital grants for the purpose of assisting
private nonprofit corporations and public agencies, under certain circumstances, in
providing transportation services to meet the needs of seniors and persons with
disabilities for whom public transportation services are otherwise unavailable,
insufficient; or inappropriate. The program provides funding for approved projects on
an 80% federa1/20% local match basis.
Section 5310 funds are awarded through a statewide competition with approximately
$7.0 million available for programming. A Local Review Committee (LRC) in each
County quantitatively evaluates all applications submitted for their area, ranks them,
then submits the scores to Caltrans Headquarters for the statewide competition. The
Commission has utilized a subcommittee of our Citizens Advisory Committee/Social
Service Transportation Advisory Council as the Local Review Committee (LRC) for
Riverside County. For FY99/00, the LRC was comprised of Fortunato Penilla, Inland
Regional Center, Lucia Moran, City of La Quinta, and Peter Benavidez, Blindness
Support.
We received 15 applications for evaluation in Riverside County. The LRC reviewed
and scored the projects on March 18. All applicants were notified of the project
scores and given the opportunity to appeal. The time line for this process will be
quite tight since Commission approved scores must be submitted to Caltrans by
May 7. Since the Commission's May meeting is after this date, all approvals must be
completed at our April 14 meeting.
The listing of the final scores for each project is attached to this agenda item and
marked as Attachment A. The Section 5310 process requires that the local
transportation commission allow public notification, participation and comment on the
proposed program of projects. All applicants have been notified of the Commission
meeting. The Commission is also required to include the awarded projects in the
Regional Transportation Improvement Plan and certify by resolution that the projects
are consistent with the local area regional transportation plan.
000012
ET0000
ue�d uogepodsueil leuoiBat/ imm Aouals!suo0
Joa/oid Buiitigia0 1£0-66 'oN uoRniosaa Bu!idope Aq ueld uoileliodsuen
feuoi6aa ease pool ayi ylinn luals!suoo aye sloefoid ayl ley1 Al!Lia0. (£
pue 'ueu luawanoidwi uoilemdsueal leuoi6aa ayl ui noefoid ayi apnloul (Z
feepwwo0 me!Aeu pool ayi Aq pepuewwooai se
s6uiluei loefoid Aluno0 ap!sieADA O L£5 uoiloaS VIA 00-666 l Ad ayi ldopy (l
:uoissiwwo0 ayi �eyl
=NO/1 b'ON3INW003hl ddV.LS ONb' 3311/IN(N00 SWVE/Dalld '8 SNV7d
RESOLUTION NO. 99-03
RESOLUTION OF THE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CERTIFYING PROJECT CONSISTENCY
WITH REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN
WHEREAS, the Local Review Committee of Riverside County ("Committee") is
charged with reviewing applications for Federal Transit Act Section 5310 funding for
transportation services to meet the needs of seniors and persons with disabilities for
whom public transportation services are otherwise unavailable, insufficient or
inappropriate; and
WHEREAS, the Committee has received requests for 15 projects from 7
agencies in Riverside County; and
WHEREAS the Committee has scored and ranked each such request; and
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Commission"),
as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency ("RTPA"), adopted the scores and
ranking of the applications as determined by the Committee; and
WHEREAS, the Section 5310 process, as interpreted in Federal Transit
Administration Circular 9070.1 C, Section 5, requires the RTPA to include in the
Regional Transportation Improvement Program each request awarded Section 5310
funding by Caltrans and to certify by resolution that the locally evaluated projects are
consistent with the local area regional transportation plan.
600014
ST0000
uoissiwwoo uoileliodsueil Alunoo apisJaARd
ail jo veto 'JaneyuadoN AIeN
is 3l_LV
uoissiwwo0 uoileliodsueil Alunoo apisJania
uosiadneyo 'JelseeH uen •3 pep
'666 l 11Pdy 10 Aep Lilt l eN1 031d0aV aNv o3A0addd
•A1uno0 aplsiania Joj paldope
wei6old luawanoidwl uolleliodsuau leuoi6aa ail ul papnlouw aq Minn sueilleo
Aq 6uipun). ()Leg uolloas papienne sloafoid ail to ioe3 z uolloag
•ueld uolleliodsuen
leuol6ai AlunoO aplsiania ayl om lualsisuoo aye (paioelle „du ligiix3 ui
pagposap se) 6uipun} p lEg uoRoas Jo} aalllwwoo ayl Aq panoidde sloafad
palenlene Alleool aql ley' paulwiaiap set.) uoissiwwo0 ayl . L uoRoas
:snnollol se aniosai pue Ao.seo Agway saop uoissiwwo0 041'31:10d3a3H1 `MON
O
CG
CG
C.)
C.) 5310scor.xls
FTA SECTION 5310 FY99/00 AF . _ICATIONS: RIVERSIDE COUNTY
REPLACE
OR
AVG EQUIPMENT SERVICE TOTAL
RANK SCORE APPLICANT AGENCY REQUESTED EXPANSION COST
1 91.00 Transportation Specialists, Inc. a- Minivan SE $43,000
2 91.00 Transportation Specialists, Inc. b- Minivan SE $43,000
3 88.00 Care -A -Van Transit, Inc. Minivan SE $43,000
4 85.75 Angel View Crippled Children's Foundation, Inc. Single Wheel Cutawa SE . $45,000
5 85.50 Family Services Assoc. of Western Riverside County Single Wheel Cutawa SE $45,000
6 85.00 Care -A -Van Transit, Inc. 699 - Cutaway R $45,000
7 84.25 Foundation for the Retarded of the Desert Other n/a $40,000
8 84.00 Care -A -Van Transit, Inc. Other - radio SE $5,200
9 83.00 Care -A -Van Transit, Inc. 701 - Cutaway R $45,000
10 81.00 Care -A -Van Transit, Inc. 698 - Cutaway R $45,000
11 81.00 Transportation Specialists, Inc. Small Bus -06511 R $56,000
12 79.75 Anza Valley Community Services, Inc. Medium Bus R $65,000
13 79.00 Transportation Specialists, Inc. Medium Bus -17838 R • $65,000
14 78.00 Desert Aids Project Minivan SE $43,000
15 75.50 Family Services Assoc. of Western Riverside County Medium Bus R $65.000
Grand Total $693,200
4/5/99 2:04 PM
AMENDED AGENDA ITEM #6A 3
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
April 14, 1999
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Plans and Programs Committee
Tanya Love, Program Manager
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
FY 1999-00 Section 5310 Program, adopt Resolution No. 99-03,
Certifying Project Consistency With Regional Transportation Plan
The FTA Section 5310 program provides capital grants for the purpose of assisting
private nonprofit corporations and public agencies, under certain circumstances, in
providing transportation services to meet the needs of seniors and persons with
disabilities for whom public transportation services are otherwise unavailable,
insufficient, or inappropriate. The program provides funding for approved projects on
an 80% federa1/20% local match basis.
Section 5310 funds are awarded through a statewide competition with approximately
$7.0 million available for programming. A Local Review Committee (LRC) in each
County quantitatively evaluates all applications submitted for their area, ranks them,
then submits the scores to Caltrans Headquarters for the statewide competition. The
Commission has .utilized a subcommittee of our Citizens Advisory Committee/Social
Service Transportation Advisory Council as the Local Review Committee (LRC) for
Riverside County. For FY99/00, the LRC was comprised of Fortunato Penilla, Inland
Regional Center, Lucia Moran, City of La Quinta, and Peter Benavidez, Blindness
Support.
We received 1-5 16 applications for evaluation in Riverside County. The LRC reviewed
and scored the projects on March 18. All applicants were notified of the project
scores and given the opportunity to appeal. The time line for this process will be
quite tight since Commission approved scores must be submitted to Caltrans by
May 7. Since the Commission's May meeting is after this date, all approvals must be
completed at our April 14 meeting.
The listing of the final scores for each project is attached to this agenda item and
marked as Attachment A. The Section 5310 process requires that the local
transportation commission allow public notification, participation and comment on the
proposed program of projects. All applicants have been notified of the Commission
meeting. The Commission is also required to include the awarded projects in the
Regional Transportation Improvement Plan and certify by resolution that the projects
are consistent with the local area regional transportation plan.
PLANS & PROGRAMS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission:
1) Adopt the FY 1999-00 FTA Section 5310 Riverside County project rankings
as recommended by the Local Review Committee;
2) Include the projects in the Regional Transportation Improvement Plan, and
3) Certify that the projects are consistent with the local area regional
transportation plan by adopting Resolution No. 99-03, Certifying Project
Consistency With Regional Transportation Plan.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-03
RESOLUTION OF THE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CERTIFYING PROJECT CONSISTENCY
WITH REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN
WHEREAS, the Local Review Committee of Riverside County ("Committee") is
charged with reviewing applications for Federal Transit Act Section 5310 funding for
transportation services to meet the needs of seniors and persons with disabilities for
whom public transportation services are otherwise unavailable, insufficient or
inappropriate; and
WHEREAS, the Committee has received requests for +5 16 projects from 7
agencies in Riverside County; and
WHEREAS the Committee has scored and ranked each such request; and
WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("Commission"),
as the Regional Transportation Planning Agency ("RTPA"), adopted the scores and
ranking of the applications as determined by the Committee; and
WHEREAS, the Section 5310 process, as interpreted in Federal Transit
Administration Circular 9070.1 C, Section 5, requires the RTPA to include in the
Regional Transportation Improvement Program each request awarded Section 5310
funding by Caltrans and to certify by resolution that the locally evaluated projects are
consistent with the local area regional transportation plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Commission does hereby certify and resolve as follows:
Section 1. The Commission has determined that the locally evaluated
projects approved by the Committee for Section 5310 funding (as described
in Exhibit "A" attached) are consistent with the Riverside. County regional
transportation plan.
Section 2. Each of the projects awarded Section 5310 funding by
Caltrans will be included in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program
adopted for Riverside County.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 1999.
Jack F. van Haaster, Chairperson
Riverside County Transportation Commission
ATTEST:
Naty Kopenhaver, Clerk of the
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FTA SECTION 5310 FY99/00 APF-LICATIONS: RIVERSIDE COUNTY
REPLACE
OR
AVG EQUIPMENT SERVICE TOTAL
RANK SCORE APPLICANT AGENCY REQUESTED EXPANSION COST
1 91.00 Transportation Specialists, Inc. a- Minivan SE $43,000
2 91.00 Transportation Specialists, Inc. b- Minivan SE $43,000
3 89.00 Transportation Specialists, Inc. Other n/a
4 88.00 Care -A -Van Transit, Inc. Minivan SE $43,000
5 85.75 Angel View Crippled Children's Foundation, Inc. Single Wheel Cutawa SE $45,000
6 85.50 Family Services Assoc. of Western Riverside County Single Wheel Cutawa SE $45,000
7 85.00 Care -A -Van Transit, Inc. 699 - Cutaway R $45,000
8 84.25 Foundation for the Retarded of the Desert Other n/a $40,000
9 84.00 Care -A -Van Transit, Inc. Other - radio SE $11,200
10 83.00 Care -A -Van Transit, Inc. 701 - Cutaway R $45,000
11 81.00 Care -A -Van Transit, Inc. 698 - Cutaway R $45,000
12 81.00 Transportation Specialists, Inc. Small Bus -06511 R $56,000
13 79.75 Anza Valley Community Services, Inc. Medium Bus R $65,000
14 79.00 Transportation Specialists, Inc. Medium Bus -17838 R $65,000
15 78.00 Desert Aids Project Minivan SE - $43,000
16 75.50 Family Services Assoc. of Western Riverside County Medium Bus R $65.000
Grand Total $699,200
$6,000
Revised Grand Total $705,200
5310scor.xls 4/13/99 4:36 PM
RIVERS/DE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMM/SS/ON
DATE:
April 14, 1999
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Plans and Programs Committee
Susan Cornelison, Rail Program Manager
THROUGH:
Eric Haley, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Rail Program Update
Attached for Commission review are the most recent rail operating and departmental
reports.
PLANS & PROGRAM COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Commission review, receive and file.
000017
NNI101113141 II II
666 L Aierucied
smvumns 33NVIAIHOdE3d NNI110E1131A1
66 96 L6 96 96 ye 46 Z6
d r O N O S r f r w r w d r O N O S r f f w r w A f O N O S r r r w r w d r O N O S r r r w V w d r O N O S r r r w r w i f O N O S r f f w r w d r O N 0
t t
Aa- 9
1 1-.lyl 1. 1 , 1 1 1 .1 1r1-.1 If / f i91 11� 1 l.�f
tied° sun 30/31
II ti1..1 1 1,1 1st_♦ / 1.1
uad0 sun 0°0
etlenbyys3
MVO Ol NOI1d301\11- SdIaL 2139N3SSVd Ada)133M 30d213AV
N N 1-102 0111
1
wad°
cull NM
0
000.E
- 000'9
000%
Oulued° putt°
- 000'Zl
- 000' S i
- 000'9l
- 000'LZ
•— 000'n
- 000'1Z
000'oE
!My fpy Ayr:4pH aggmal
66-9ad 66-uef 96-30a 86-AoN 86-130 96-das 96-isnid 96-1nr 136-unr 96-Ae114 96-AV 136-ieVi 96-119A
Sci1a1.1:1301‘13SSVd AVM133M 39V/I3AV
NNI1M11.31A1
000'91.,
000'91
000'0Z
00.0'ZZ
000'n
000'9Z
000'8Z
000'0£
A
17)Ihreu-FiN RleogywSIEZN:a
%l
L91
%0
0
%0
L
'%L
SE
%0
0
%1
601
%0
It
%0
91
*VI A14ri+oW W %
WILL I�Ip9 AIRO Qn
:88 Anniga3 - sdNl paps
%ti
%Zb
%E L
%LL
%L-
%1-
%Z
%Z L
%Z
86 clad sn 66 gad
a6ueyO 46
%L-
%£ L
%Z-
%0-
%0-
%0
%Z
%Z-
%L-
68 uer sn 66 qeA
e6ue40 %
%I.-
06S51Z
19
OZB'1
Ltit7'S
956`£
9EE
00Z'9
990`t
t+05'£
66 qad
%9
968'LZ
t+5
ZS9' 1
£Si'15
ZL6'£
SEE
££018
Et 117 7
bSLt
66 ue f
%S-
6176`9Z
LS
999'1
E6L't
E18'£
OSE
SZL'L
1£61£
ZZ9'£
86080
%t►
£9E`1Z
99
199' 1
81t►'S
8E8'£
Eti£
61Z'8
L Mit+
5191E
86 noN
%E
1+0£49Z
ZS
09L'1
S£0'S
0081E
50t+
ES8'1
016'E
6Z17'E
86100
%0
9Z9`SZ
LS
LSL'L
06L`t►
LSL`£
18£
EL9'L
E681E
t+Z£1£
96deS
%1
917S4SZ
LS
91f 1
919'17
t►t+91E
SOt
999'L
SZ6`£
LZ£'E
86 6ny
%1-
LOZ`SZ
St
149'1
OOL't
VLL'£
10t+
LZti'L
Z9L'£
LZVE
86lnr
%£-
069'9Z
Et
0ZL11
1191t+
01+6'£
08£
E5511.
17181E
Z91r'E
86 unf
%Z-
P1S'9Z
617
99L'1
S99't►
t+£0't
SVC
St+6`L
8661E
11L1£
86Aell
%1
1.9619Z
817
Z89` 1
£S611+
19017
81£
991'9
Lti0't►
0691E
96 idy
%1
Z179'9Z
tit+
199'1
900'S
8L1't
9£E
9Z8'L
0961E
8091E
86 Jell
%Z-
9Se9Z
CV
L 19' L
L 16'1►
££Z't+ ,
19£
8Z018
LZ9`£
LEtr'E
86 qaA
oyy Loud SA
oeueua % ;
WaLSAS
Taal.
V1 '_ .
lllnA/mu
00 '
ldl-u3 Ill
4=0
a6ue40
eptsiembi
stun'
luegynS
oupiewaa
ues .
AaileA
edolaluy
ionoo ':
einluen.
<_ 3.mou
amsnf OV AVOI1OH - MOONIM H1NOW N331aIH1
Sd{2il H39N3SSVd AVCD133M 3JHVIGAd mr4nomi3W
ri
C1` t
t
Q
'J
O
s
MAA'0031Z066WueoclyNSJ£Z L1
66 clad
uer
oaa
noN
130
dag
Bny
Inf
Amon Npn \lv, ,pn Npn NPPP
\ \\\�
\o \\\o\\\\\\\�\\\\\\\\ \\;
Ns,\ \ \�. \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \,
\ \ . \ \ ... �.1\\\\ \\,. \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \.,..,
unr
Aeyy
Jdy Jew
86 claA
awa painpaws sainum-g uNI!M 6uwnpJy suieal uopaijalead Jo
aun Aiunoo afiueaoiaijclw3 puelui
%0
%0Zr
%OP
%09
%08
%00 L
66 clad
uer
V II� \I� \N.n 86 clad �� I \/
\\,\\ �\\ \\ \\,\\ \\ \\\\ \\
\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\1\\ \\ \\
\\ \\,\\ \\,\\ , \\ \\ \\ \\;\\ \\ �\
\\ \\ \\ \\ \� \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\
\\ \\ \\ \\\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\
\\ \\I\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\
\\ \\,\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\;\\ \\ \\
\,\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\,\\\\\\
\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \, \\ \\.\\ \\ \\
\\ \\ \��\�\\ \\ \\ \ \ \\.� \...�. \,\ \\i\\. \\ \:.\.
\ \O�\�\ \ `.� \\O""\OHO\ \ \ \ & \ \ �� .. \ \���\��� \\,\����\ �� \\�\ \ \�\\\\
aaa
noN
PO
deg
Bny
Inf
unr
Aeyy
Jdy Jew
paisnfpy AepiloH - sdpi aa6uassed itHea a6enny
aun Alunoo a6ueao/aijclw3 puelui
0
00E
009
006
00ZL
00SL
008L
OOLZ
• ul .186UeSSed Allea 6n 4
C‘,1
0
dHM'1VSZ0661P-mo4W►9-19Z 11:a
66 Gad
uef oaa
noN
PO
das
env
Inf
unf
Aeyy
idv
Jew 96 clad
\\\iim
Nr, ,ir,.
\\\\\\\\\ \Nv.
\‘pir,
\\\\\\ \\\\\\rp,
.1pr,
\, \
\\
\ \ \\\ \\\\, \\\ \\\
\ \ \\\�\ \\ \ \
\\ p p p\\\�\\ \\\\\
,I�\ \\ \ \ \\\� \ \ \ \ \ \ . 2,
\� \ \ �\\\\ \\ \ \.\ \\ �\. \\ \\ \\ \\:
:� i \ v k a \Q\\\\�\\\' \ e \ i' e•" \\��\\\\ \ \\ \. \\\\\�\\ � \: ,'`> \ 3' \' ” 3 ; i \ � \
\\�,.�\\\\\\\\\\`.. ..\\\Q ..� \\\\\\\"`' �\� \ \\\�\\tip\,a �z ;
awil palnpayog jo sainum-g uRIPAA 6uN-uv %
animas Aepanies °Lin ouipaewa8 ues
%
%
"OP
%09
%09
%00 L
66 gad
uer
oaa
noN
PO
des
env
Inf
unr
Aeyy
idv
sdpi Ja6uassed Allen a6eJany
animas Aepnies Gun ouipaewee ueS
suapw Auno3 'V 'l sapnput Was :aloN
96 gad
0
009 D
000
v
0091 et.
000Z =.
a.
009Z 5
000E
dNAA1VSZ066113NogVASJEZ N:a
66 qaA
uef 300
N
noN
3�0
das Buy
\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ . �\"4,•
Inf
unf
idy
miN 98 qaA
awu. painpews jo sa}num-g uNi!M 6uini.uy sme 11 %
ao uas Aepanies aun Aelien adoialud
%0
%0Z
%0L7
%0s
°%08
°%00
66 clod
uef
oa0
noN
PO
96n,uz pannuus atwas NV 1
das 6ny
tnf
unf
o
\o \I \\\
\\\ \\\\ \\ \\ \\\,
Iteyq idy Jeyy BB qad
\\\\\\\\\\\\L
•
sdpi Ja6uassed Alpo a6eJand
Gown AepanTes aun Aailen adoialuy
0
00S
000L
00SL
000Z
00SZ
000E
Japu Pe. •A,
C's.t
0
0
B
P IKdl0-3IeedkpueOtiVASJ£Zl\ o
66 q°d
66 yet'
06 3aO
uiw-g umwt Bwnurd % Aelep up-o to!M Bwewy %
66 AoN
06 MHO 06 deS
a6 onV
66 IN'
06 unf
06 Aepy
(swim EL iseiel) Apo smell uogoaiialead 'pouadlead
30N3H3HCIV 311103H3S )1N110N/31A1
96 idV
96Jgry
96 904
%0
%0Z
%09
%09
%00
i
b
tAlm'owE L-10111180cam9JEZR:o
66 qaj 66 uer
6
1 awl' pap -paps ps sainuM-g 1-1P-111M 6wnwy
86 PO
86 des 86 Orly
86 Inf
86 unf
86 hifi 86 idd
66 Jew 86 clad
y J
.J
6
(synuon E Iselei) smell Aep leeM IIV
30N31:13HCIV 31f103HOS mNnomi3W
%0
%0Z
%OP
%09
%09
a/o00 L
Of
1eeveusCl-101915104VM41£ZVO
I
I
vop/ln3110 1wWOO sW ul PsPnIp1M 1uu aus ages PslleuuY
vopsuluuy p mod is eu rmo IOWA dog N to PuPIa= sus 1W W PW14pue1
TAW M4wlllm pi sPsw •Ms4 siwu10110. oN
%CS
-
%S6
%Z6
550
• %0
5406 %LS
%Z6
%a6
%LI
%WI
%56
5486
%66
5516
%001
WA
%96
%001
suleSLPoP+dvia
ti4 io,L
PainO wl
Pau)101
WN1dMM
.:
'row 00/dur3 NM
emOM 00 ..
Qpe2i A18
`:
"Wni 21f18 :'
',a eNs
•wsns.v+Y
1
:'..:
roa ►ijil
6e ga 4
WIl paIoPWS 10 swum/ 9 wow 6away salmi Mod Nood
%EB
%66 %Z6
%9L %0L
% l6 %08
% l6 %69
%L9 %E9
%L6 %66
%L6 %Z6
%96
%96
%96 %66
66 qvA
%E6
%ES %Z6
%8L %S8
%L9 %Z8
%Z6 %S S
%16 %99
%66 %66
%E6 %L8
%Z6
%66
%LB %66
66 uof
%69
%88 %68
%69 %EL
%Z8 %E8
% 18 %S9
%E8 %08
%96 %86
%88 %L8
%S6
%£6
%E6 %96
86 *e0
%68
%69 %99
%09 %68
%Z8 %Z8
%68 %6L
%Z8 %E9
%L6 %L6
%06. %S9
%68
%E6
%66 %L6
86 AoN
•
10 960.
%06
%L9 %ZB
%99 %98
%S8 %EB
%08 %69
%Z8 %S6
%96 %86
%16 %Hi
%99
%98
%lL %£6
9698
%LB %06
%L9 %9L
%68 %08
%66 %0B
%L9 %Z8
%L6 %86
%66 %66
%88
%E6
%LL %S8
88 doe
%L9
%E9 9i28
%0L %9L
%88 %Z8
%68 %66
%S9 %98
966 %66
%06 %Z6
%9L
%68
%8L %96
98 pod
%98
%6e %L8
%Z9 %Z9
-
%E6 %98
%E6 %6L
%19 %ZL
%96 %96
%L8 %06
%98
%E6
%SL %06
86lor
%08
%06 %06
%0L %£9
%68 %S9
%96 % l6
%6L %08
%£6 %86
%ZB %E6
%Z6
%06
%99 %06
96 oor
%06
%06 %16
%06 %SB
%68 %16
%L6 %66
%EL %69
%86 %86
%06 %Z6
%96
%16
%£9 %08
96 Aar,'
%06
%99 %£6
%96 96Z8.
%88 %66
%68 %68
%lL %08
%LB %96
%98 %86
%L9
%96
%6L %06
881dtl
%Z6
%Z8 %E6
%99 %SS
%Z6 %98
%89 %S9
%l6 %S8
%Z6 %96
%86 %86
%L9
%66
%16 %L6
88 JeW
%88
%98 %06
9606 %08
% l8 %68
%89 %6L
%98 %06
% l6 %E6
% l6 %S6
%68
%S8
%E6 %66
96 clo3
8484 NV
1ViaL :: ;
too ui
0131.8AS' VI0J.
)110 of
VI/Ind/AM
oN o8
30/dw3 Puelul
PO ul .
Awe* e9ue.10 ;
v 10 ul
oPl�A!2!
ua0 ':! ul ` �
J. **WO
VIC) ul
oulFueung ueS
my
AelleA
ul
}W
PIO W
: 4iuno3 �3u0A ;
<= 3J noti
SHINOW El 1S31V1
auall pap -twin Io sa;nugy 9 uly;lM Bulnu.ld sulell depleaM jo a6ewaa.lad
ANVINIA f1S 30N32131-10b 3111031-10S MNII0Z113W
C\1
co
11
YHM'sf vozossuuso N lulu*
L
0
0
0
0
t
0
0
0
0
0
lAV
(epinleS
0
0
0
t
0
0
0
Z
0
0
0
0
9NS
AepanleS
00
C7
i `D
i
%00 L
091
9 t
6Z
8£
9£
L
6Z
6 L
9
1V101
%S t
LZ
0
0
t
ti
9
L
8
Z
ia410
%L
t
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
0
Ao!Iod PIoH Va2iOS
%£
9
0
0
0
0
0
E
L
L
(sPaBuessed
%£
9
0
0
0
L
0
£
t
L
wsgepum
%Z
b
0
0
0
0
0
Z
Z
0
wnilleaw luoculew
% t
Z
0
L
t
0
0
0
0
0
upl xwituV
%£
9
0
L
0
0
0
Z
L
L
U1eJ114s!aid
%6
9L
0
Z
£
L
Z
8
0
0
IMIIM4oaw
%£t+
8L
PL
PZ
PZ
St
0
t
0
0
6uPpleds10
%E
9
L
L
Z
0
0
Z
0
0
431!MS/13Bil
%i
G
0
0
S 0
0
0
0
0
MOW/siaP10 MOIS
%V L
SZ
L
0
Z
S t
0
L
5
L
sioloala0/s!eu6!S
101 Jo %
1V101
1/JRi
OOIINI
OO
Ala
ans
8NS
lAV
N3A
:3Sf1V3
93111NIW S NVH1 tal.V3210 SAK13a NI`d231 JO 3snvo A21WW21d
6661 tienigaA
SAv-ma NN1-1011131N AO sasnv0
�%H M D 3 t : L I Z 0 8 9 W J " o 4 V A V E Z N V o
v a w e g A e p u g e S s e p n m e t i e w w n s s ! y l
'