The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About10 October 10, 2018 CommissionComments are welcomed by the Commission. If you wish to provide comments to the Commission, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board. MEETING AGENDA TIME/DATE: 9:30 a.m. / Wednesday, October 10, 2018 LOCATION: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside COMMISSIONERS Chair – Dana Reed Vice Chair – Chuck Washington Second Vice Chair – Ben J. Benoit Kevin Jeffries, County of Riverside, District 1 John F. Tavaglione, County of Riverside, District 2 Chuck Washington, County of Riverside, District 3 V. Manuel Perez, County of Riverside, District 4 Marion Ashley, County of Riverside, District 5 Deborah Franklin / Art Welch, City of Banning Lloyd White / Nancy Carroll, City of Beaumont Joseph DeConinck / Tim Wade, City of Blythe Jim Hyatt / Linda Molina, City of Calimesa Randall Bonner / Vicki Warren, City of Canyon Lake Greg Pettis / Shelley Kaplan, City of Cathedral City Steven Hernandez / To Be Appointed, City of Coachella Karen Spiegel / Randy Fox, City of Corona Scott Matas / Russell Betts, City of Desert Hot Springs Adam Rush / Clint Lorimore, City of Eastvale Linda Krupa / Russ Brown, City of Hemet Dana Reed / To Be Appointed, City of Indian Wells Michael Wilson / Glenn Miller, City of Indio Brian Berkson / Verne Lauritzen, City of Jurupa Valley Kathleen Fitzpatrick / Robert Radi, City of La Quinta Bob Magee / Natasha Johnson, City of Lake Elsinore Bill Zimmerman / John Denver, City of Menifee Victoria Baca / Ulises Cabrera, City of Moreno Valley Rick Gibbs / Jonathan Ingram, City of Murrieta Berwin Hanna / Ted Hoffman, City of Norco Jan Harnik / Kathleen Kelly, City of Palm Desert Lisa Middleton / Jon R. Roberts, City of Palm Springs Michael M. Vargas / Rita Rogers, City of Perris Ted Weill / Charles Townsend, City of Rancho Mirage Rusty Bailey / Andy Melendrez, City of Riverside Andrew Kotyuk / Scott Miller, City of San Jacinto Michael S. Naggar / Matt Rahn, City of Temecula Ben J. Benoit / Timothy Walker, City of Wildomar Janice Benton, Governor’s Appointee Caltrans District 8 COMM-COMM-00119 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION www.rctc.org MEETING AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda 9:30 a.m. Wednesday, October 10, 2018 BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, CA In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72 hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting at the Commission office, 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor, Riverside, CA, and on the Commission’s website, www.rctc.org. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Government Code Section 54954.2, and the Federal Transit Administration Title VI, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787-7141 if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, including accessibility and translation services. Assistance is provided free of charge. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting time will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide assistance at the meeting. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3) continuous minutes or less. The Commission may, either at the direction of the Chair or by majority vote of the Commission, waive this three-minute time limitation. Depending on the number of items on the Agenda and the number of speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion, reduce the time of each speaker to two (2) continuous minutes. In addition, the maximum time for public comment for any individual item or topic is thirty (30) minutes. Also, the Commission may terminate public comments if such comments become repetitious. Speakers may not yield their time to others without the consent of the Chair. Any written documents to be distributed or presented to the Commission shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board. This policy applies to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items. Under the Brown Act, the Commission should not take action on or discuss matters raised during public comment portion of the agenda that are not listed on the agenda. Commission members may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent agenda for consideration. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – SEPTEMBER 12, 2018 Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda October 10, 2018 Page 2 6. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS – The Commission may add an item to the Agenda after making a finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to the attention of the Commission subsequent to the posting of the agenda. An action adding an item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Commission. If there are less than 2/3 of the Commission members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote. Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 7. PUBLIC HEARING – RCTC 91 EXPRESS LANES TOLL POLICY Page 1 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Conduct a public hearing to receive input on the proposed toll policy; and 2) Approve Resolution 18-014, “Amended and Restated Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Regarding the RCTC 91 Express Lane Toll Policy”. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR – All matters on the Consent Calendar will be approved in a single motion unless a Commissioner(s) requests separate action on specific item(s). Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda. 8A. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Page 25 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the year ended June 30, 2018. 8B. CHANGE ORDER TO AMEND THE INTERSTATE 15 EXPRESS LANES PROJECT DESIGN- BUILD CONTRACT WITH SKANSKA-AMES, A JOINT VENTURE, FOR THE INTERSTATE 15/STATE ROUTE 91 EXPRESS LANES CONNECTOR PROJECT Page 36 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Change Order No. 10 to Agreement No. 16-31-057-00 for the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project (I-15 ELP) with Skanska-Ames, a Joint Venture (Skanska-Ames), to perform final engineering design work and limited construction within the limits of the I-15 ELP to accommodate the I-15/State Route 91 Express Lanes Connector Project (15/91 ELC) in the amount of $15,234,804, plus a contingency amount of $750,000, for a total amount not to exceed $15,984,804; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the change order amendment on behalf of the Commission; and Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda October 10, 2018 Page 3 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total amount not to exceed as required for the project. 8C. AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, MATERIALS TESTING, AND CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING FOR THE MID COUNTY PARKWAY – SWEENEY MITIGATION SITE PROJECT IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY Page 52 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 18-31-166-00 to DHS Consulting, Inc. to perform construction management services, materials testing, and construction surveying for the Mid County Parkway – Sweeney Mitigation Site Project (Project) in the amount of $907,717, plus a contingency amount of $90,772, for potential changes in scope, for a total amount not to exceed $998,489; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required for the Project. 8D. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE 1600 STREAMBED ALTERATION MASTER AGREEMENT FOR THE MID COUNTY PARKWAY PROJECT Page 77 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Authorize staff to procure a 1600 Streambed Alteration Master Agreement (Master Agreement) from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) for the entire Mid County Parkway (MCP) project for a term of 21 years through 2040; 2) Approve the expenditure for a permit related to the procurement of the Master Agreement in the amount of $86,826 and for an annual Master Agreement administrative maintenance fee of approximately $725 for a total amount of $15,215, plus a contingency amount of $7,500 for a total amount not to exceed $109,541; 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve non-funding agreements or amendments that might be required for these services. Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda October 10, 2018 Page 4 8E. FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 STATE OF GOOD REPAIR PROGRAM Page 89 Overview This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 18-016, “Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Authorizing the Execution of the Certifications and Assurances for the California State of Good Repair Program”; 2) Approve an amendment to the Commission’s Commuter Rail Program’s FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) for $799,813 related to the receipt and use of Senate Bill 1 State of Good Repair (SGR) funds for the Station Rehabilitation Program; 3) Approve an allocation of $799,813 in SGR funds to the Commission’s Station Rehabilitation Program; 4) Authorize the Executive Director, or her designee, to submit project nominations to Caltrans and execute the Recipient Certifications and Assurances and other required documents for the SGR program; and 5) Approve a $799,813 adjustment to the FY 2018/19 budget to increase state revenues and property improvement expenditures. 9. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Page 92 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file an update on state and federal legislation. 10. VANCLUB UPDATE – RCTC’S ONGOING VANPOOL SUBSIDY PROGRAM Page 102 Overview This item is for the Commission to receive and file a report on the public launch of the Commission’s ongoing vanpool subsidy program – VanClub. 11. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AGENDA 12. COMMISSIONERS / EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Overview This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and the Executive Director to report on attended meetings/conferences and any other items related to Commission activities. Riverside County Transportation Commission Meeting Agenda October 10, 2018 Page 5 13. CLOSED SESSION 13A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director or Designee Property Owner(s): See Below Item RCPN APN(s) Property Owner(s) 1 1139 363-140-088 Vermeulen Properties 5 2 1140 363-140-089 Railroad Plaza 3 1141 363-140-090 In & Out Burger 4 1150 363-171-004 Elsinore Dynasty Holdings 5 1151 363-171-003 SMBD Inv 6 1152 363-140-091 HUB Enterprises 7 1154 363-530-005 Veto Elsinore II 8 1155 363-530-003 Walmart Stores, Inc. 9 1156 363-140-085 Dorothy Boone-Murdock 10 1157 363-530-007 Veto Elsinore 11 1158 363-530-012 World Savings & Loan Assn. 13B. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director or Designee Item APN(s) Property Owner Buyer(s) 1 117-080-011, 117-080-013 and 117-080-014 (combined into one sale) Riverside County Transportation Commission Exclusive Energy 13C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) Case No(s). RIC 1311383 and 16167899 14. ADJOURNMENT The next meeting of the Commission is scheduled to be held on Wednesday, November 14, 2018, Board Room, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. AGENDA ITEM 5 MINUTES RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, September 12, 2018 1. CALL TO ORDER The Riverside County Transportation Commission was called to order by Chair Dana Reed at 9:13 a.m. in the Board Room at the County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside, California, 92501. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners/Alternates Present Commissioners Absent Marion Ashley* Linda Molina Ben J. Benoit Victoria Baca* V. Manuel Perez Randall Bonner Rusty Bailey Dana Reed Deborah Franklin Brian Berkson Adam Rush Berwin Hanna Joseph DeConinck Charles Townsend Steven Hernandez Kathleen Fitzpatrick Michael M. Vargas Andrew Kotyuk Randy Fox Chuck Washington Linda Krupa Rick Gibbs Lloyd White Michael Naggar Jan Harnik Greg Pettis Kevin Jeffries John F. Tavaglione Bob Magee Michael Wilson Scott Matas* Bill Zimmerman Lisa Middleton *Arrived after meeting was called to order 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Clerk of the Board Lisa Mobley led the Commission in a flag salute. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS Anne Mayer, Executive Director, presented Capital Projects Manager Alex Menor with a five-year service award. Anne Mayer congratulated and introduced the project team for the State Route 60 Truck Climbing Lane project as the California Transportation Commission last month provided an allocation of funding for the project, which will be starting in 2019. Riverside County Transportation Commission Special Meeting Minutes September 12, 2018 Page 2 Governor’s Appointee Caltrans District 8 John Bulinski also expressed gratitude to the SR-60 Truck Climbing Lane project team for all their hard work and time that was put into getting this project delivered. At this time, Commissioner Victoria Baca joined the meeting. Joe Morgan, representing the residents and the businesses near McKinley Avenue in Corona, referred to Agenda Item 8H, “SB 132 Agreement for McKinley Grade Separation project”, and stated this project was always intended to be a rail over bridge. He discussed when SB 1 passed, accompanying incentives went along with it, and how the spring of last year this grade separation became a road over rail project. He expressed concern this has become a backdoor redevelopment plan that is using transportation funds to take away private property and 88 businesses will be affected by this. He suggested the Commission have the city of Corona go back and do some engineering for the rail over bridge so it will be less impactful to the businesses in that area. Jon Shardlow, Land Use Counsel for NAIOP, referred to the truck fee and stated irrespective of the policy for implementing, the fee might have been overlooked. There are technical deficiencies they are attempting to discuss with the Commission staff and the technical consultants. He noted as currently proposed the fee is illegal and he understood that counsel has not looked at this proposed fee under the mitigation act and compliance with it. NAIOP is present in good faith to explain the deficiencies that are apparent and bring these technical issues forward. He discussed the issues with the out dated data for actual truck trip traffic and the issues with the baseline. He expressed appreciation to the Commission for hosting a Stakeholder Workshop on September 28 and NAIOP will be part of that and work with staff and the consults to get a fair and legal fee for the Commission’s consideration. At this time, Commissioner Marion Ashley joined the meeting. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – JULY 11, 2018 M/S/C (Vargas/Rush) to approve the July 11, 2018 minutes as submitted. Riverside County Transportation Commission Special Meeting Minutes September 12, 2018 Page 3 At this time, Commissioner Scott Matas joined the meeting. At this time, Chair Reed recessed to Closed Session. 6. CLOSED SESSION 6A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Agency Negotiator: Executive Director or Designee Property Owner(s): See Below Item APN(s) Property Owner(s) Buyer(s) 1 349-090-028 Riverside County Transportation Commission Luis Arreguin 2 345-080-073 Riverside County Transportation Commission Rod Arsalan and Roberto de la Torre 3 285-210-018 and 285-210-019 Riverside County Transportation Commission Conrad Thuy and Marie Pham 4 279-190-046 and 279-240-019 Riverside County Transportation Commission Diana and Bruce Luo (Best Investment, LLC) 5 465-100-001 Alice Dilworth, Nelson Dilworth, Gloria Lynn Gatton, George Michael Dilworth and Janet Kaye Dilworth Parish Riverside County Transportation Commission At this time, Chair Reed resumed Open Session. At this time, Chair Reed asked Steve DeBaun, Legal Counsel, to report out of Closed Session. Steve DeBaun, replied the Board considered five items in Closed Session and there is no reportable action on any of those Closed Session Items. 7. ADDITIONS / REVISIONS There were no additions or revisions to the agenda. At this time, Commissioner Lloyd White left the meeting. Riverside County Transportation Commission Special Meeting Minutes September 12, 2018 Page 4 8. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Randy Fox requested to pull Agenda Item 8H, “SB 132 Agreement for McKinley Grade Separation project”, for further discussion. M/S/C (Berkson/Vargas) to approve the following Consent Calendar items. 8A. SINGLE SIGNATURE AUTHORITY REPORT Receive and file the Single Signature Authority report for the fourth quarter ended June 30, 2018. 8B. QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2018. 8C. FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION TRIENNIAL REVIEW RESULTS Receive and file a report on the 2018 Triennial Review of the Commission performed by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 8D. PROPOSITION 1B CALIFORNIA TRANSIT SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM 2018 SITE VISIT SUMMARY Receive and file the Proposition 1B California Transit Security Grant Program (CTSGP) 2018 Site Visit Summary. 8E. FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT AND MEASURE A AUDIT RESULTS Receive and file the Transportation Development Act (TDA) and Measure A audit results report for Fiscal Year 2016/17. 8F. ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SOFTWARE IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT 1) Approve sole source Agreement No. 19-19-003-00 to SDI Presence, LLC (SDI) for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software implementation project management oversight for a two-year period in the amount of $436,800, plus a 15 percent contingency amount of $65,500, for a total amount not to exceed $502,300; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; Riverside County Transportation Commission Special Meeting Minutes September 12, 2018 Page 5 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency work pursuant to the agreement terms up to the total amount; and 4) Approve a budget adjustment in the amount of $251,100. 8G. QUARTERLY PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT METRICS REPORT, APRIL – JUNE 2018 Receive and file the Quarterly Public Engagement Metrics Report for April – June 2018. 8I. FISCAL YEAR 2018/19 ANNUAL LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND PLANNING ALLOCATIONS TO WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS AND COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Approve an allocation of Local Transportation Fund (LTF) funds for planning in the amount of $775,500 for Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) and $423,000 for the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) for efforts identified in each agency’s Fiscal Year 2018/19 LTF Program Objectives/Work Plan (Work Plan) that supports transportation planning programs and functions consistent with regional and subregional plans, programs, and requirements. 8J. RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY FISCAL YEAR 2018/2019 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AMENDMENT 1) Approve an amendment to the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Fiscal Year 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) for $22.1 million related to the payment of RTA’s current unfunded pension liability; 2) Approve an allocation of $22.1 million in Local Transportation Fund (LTF) Western County Bus Unallocated LTF fund balance to provide funding for RTA to pay its current unfunded pension liability; and 3) Approve an adjustment to the FY 2018/19 budget in the amount of $22.1 million to increase transit operating expenditures. 8K. RIVERSIDE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION: ANNUAL COUNTYWIDE PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016/17 Receive and file the Riverside County Public Transportation: Annual Countywide Performance Report (Countywide Report) for Fiscal Year 2016/17. Riverside County Transportation Commission Special Meeting Minutes September 12, 2018 Page 6 8L. CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH SPECTRUM CONSTRUCTION GROUP FOR THE INTERSTATE 15 EXPRESS LANES REGIONAL OPERATIONS CENTER AND STORAGE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY AND THE 91 EXPRESS LANES CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTER 1) Award Agreement No. 18-31-170-00 to Spectrum Construction Group, Inc. (Spectrum), as the lowest responsible bidder submitting a responsive bid, for the construction of the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Regional Operations Center (ROC) and Storage and Maintenance Facility (SAM) and the 91 Express Lanes Customer Service Center (CSC) project (Project) in the amount of $3,600,075, plus a contingency amount of $360,000, for a total amount not to exceed $3,960,075; 2) Waive informalities and minor irregularities in the Spectrum bid; 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 4) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency work up to the total amount not to exceed as required for the Project; and 5) Approve a $1,157,550 adjustment to the Fiscal Year 2018/19 budget to increase toll building construction costs. 8M. AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR A SENATE BILL 1 FUNDED OPERATION OF THE FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL PROGRAM IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1) Approve Agreement No. 19-45-007-00 with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for the operation of the Riverside County Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) program in an amount not to exceed $1,656,973 in SB 1 funding; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; 3) Approve an adjustment to the Fiscal Year 2018/19 motorist assistance budget in the amount of $347,900, to increase revenues for the Freeway Service Patrol program; and 4) Adopt Resolution No. 18-015 “Approving the Agreement with the California Department of Transportation For SB 1 Funded Operation of FSP Program in Riverside County”. At this time, Commissioner White rejoined the meeting. 9. STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Jillian Guizado, Legislative Affairs Manager, presented the details of the state and federal legislative update. Riverside County Transportation Commission Special Meeting Minutes September 12, 2018 Page 7 M/S/C to receive and file an update on state and federal legislation. 10. UPDATE ON THE REGIONAL TRUCK AND LOGISTICS MITIGATION FEE STUDY AND REVIEW OF THE DRAFT NEXUS STUDY Lorelle Moe-Luna, Acting Multimodal Services Director, presented an update on the regional truck and logistics mitigation fee study and review of the draft nexus study. She noted a Stakeholder Workshop is scheduled for September 28 at 9:30 a.m. in the Board Room and another workshop is tentatively scheduled for October 24. Comments received during this period will be compiled and provided to the Commission at a future meeting for consideration. M/S/C/ to receive and file an update on the Regional Truck Study. 11. ITEM(S) PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION Commissioner Fox referred to Mr. Morgan’s public comments and stated his concerns were shared with him at the beginning of this process and he met with all of the affected businesses in that area. He explained being the only one initially to vote only to explore the rail over road as his collogues voted for the other project here. He discussed as this was moving forward he continued to work with those businesses and met with the city of Corona staff that was very responsive with a design that will mitigate any impact to any business. Commissioner Fox stated the change was made to keep continuing to look at it but go forward with this and he expressed support for this project. 8H. SB 132 AGREEMENT FOR MCKINLEY GRADE SEPARATION PROJECT M/S/C (Vargas/Washington) to: 1) Approve Agreement No. 19-31-005-00 with the city of Corona for the McKinley Grade Separation project that received an allocation of $84,450,000 of SB 132 funds; and 2) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement and any future amendments considered minor, with the exception of changes to funding. At this time, Commissioner V. Manual Perez left the meeting. Riverside County Transportation Commission Special Meeting Minutes September 12, 2018 Page 8 12. COMMISSIONERS/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT 12A. Anne Mayer announced: • An update on SB 1 related projects and how SB 1 allowed the Commission to open up expanded beats in Southwest County. She stated in order to assist and educate the public about SB 1 staff distributed a fact sheet for each jurisdiction to the Commissioners. In November if SB 1 funding is repealed, the Commission’s plan is to address a need for Plan B if it is required. • Within the next two weeks after Interstate 15 will be re-striped at the entrance to the toll facility at northbound I-15 (Option 1). All construction alerts will commence. 12B. John Bulinski announced there will be a 2018 Caltrans District 8 Innovation Fair scheduled for September 19 from 10:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m. 12C. Commissioner Kevin Jeffries referred to the comments being heard about the truck study going forward and wanted to ensure the Commission uses good, solid data so there are no legal challenges and there is buy in from the stakeholders. He expressed gratitude to all the Commissioners for their commitment to dealing with the Warehouse Logistics Trucking industry issues. He expressed if the Commission does not figure out a way to deal with this then Air Quality Mobility District will. 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Riverside County Transportation Commission, Chair Reed adjourned the meeting at 10:09 a.m. The next Commission meeting is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, October 10, 2018, Board Chambers, First Floor, County Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside. Respectfully submitted, Lisa Mobley Clerk of the Board AGENDA ITEM 7 PUBLIC HEARING Agenda Item 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: October 10, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Toll Policy and Operations Committee Jennifer Crosson, Toll Operations Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: RCTC 91 Express Lanes Toll Policy TOLL POLICY AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1) Conduct a public hearing to receive input on the proposed toll policy; and 2) Approve Resolution 18-014, “Amended and Restated Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Regarding the RCTC 91 Express Lane Toll Policy”. BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION: In June 2012, the Commission adopted Resolution 12-019 “Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Regarding the RCTC 91 Express Lanes Toll Policy.” The policy adopted in June of 2012 was modeled after the Orange County Transportation Authority’s (OCTA) toll policy assuming that the OCTA and RCTC portions of the 91 Express Lanes would operate similarly and therefore demand could be stimulated or managed under identical policies. The Express Lanes opened in March of 2017 with demand far surpassing original projections. This has required frequent toll rate adjustments over the first 16 months to accomplish free-flow operations. The RCTC 91 Express Lanes are intended to provide free-flow travel throughout the two-lane section of the facility. However, at the eastern end of the project, where the two lanes diverge into single lanes in the eastbound direction, the facility can experience significant delays during some afternoon peak periods. A similar pattern can be observed in the morning where two single lanes merge into two lanes in the westbound direction, and traffic delays occur during the peak morning rush hours. Physical improvements and toll rate changes have been made to reduce delays at the eastern end, but backups continue to occur westbound in the morning and eastbound in the afternoon on certain key days of the week. 1 Agenda Item 7 The adopted toll policy provides for the use of time-of-day variable pricing and sets forth the methodology for adjusting toll rates. The policy established toll rates for each level of service (A through E) according to the Highway Capacity Manual using the same toll rate per mile used in the OCTA toll policy. The individual levels of service provide a range of traffic volumes per hour based on the capacity for a two-lane facility. As express lane congestion increases (i.e level of service decreases), the associated toll rate per mile increases to manage demand and seek to maintain free-flow travel. Through regular monitoring staff and its traffic consultant Stantec have determined that each of the single lanes have different traffic capacities. Additionally, the demand for the McKinley Street destination is greater than the I-15 south destination. After extensive review and analysis of the Express Lanes performance, the pricing methodology has been changed to accomplish free-flow travel for each destination point served by the overall facility. In short, if travel demand to or from McKinley Street is greater than it is for I-15, the toll should be correspondingly higher to ensure free-flow travel. The current policy, which allows for toll rate adjustments based on traffic volumes in the two-lane portion of the facility, does not allow for adjustments to address the available capacity of each of the single-lane segments of the facility. The unanticipated need to manage traffic for each single lane segment of the facility is the primary reason modifications to the toll policy are being sought. The adopted toll policy also provided staff with greater flexibility in making toll adjustments more swiftly during the facility’s ramp up period. The ramp up period was intended to address operational concerns in cases of limited or uncertain demand, not the higher-than-expected demand that has been realized by the success of the facility. The adopted policy allows for toll rate adjustments every 12 weeks. With only 16 months of historical data for the Commission’s portion of the 91 Express Lanes traffic volumes and demand have yet to provide a stable environment during peak periods. This unstable environment and excess demand during peak Eastern End Single-lane 2 Agenda Item 7 periods are requiring more frequent monitoring of traffic and toll rate adjustments to effectively manage the Commission’s portion of the 91 Express Lanes. Amendments to the toll rate policy are being recommended to address the need to manage traffic at the single-lane portions of the facility and to provide the ability to make more frequent toll rate adjustments when needed. There are four main components of the toll policy for which changes are being sought: 1) level of service hourly volumes, 2) super-peak volume triggers, 3) super-peak toll adjustment amounts, and 4) annual inflation adjustment. A change to each of the four components is being recommended to allow the 91 Express Lanes to meet the goals established in the toll policy. Level of Service Hourly Volumes The level of service hourly volumes are used to establish the hourly toll rate based on traffic volumes. Level of service refers to the quality of traffic operations for a specific traffic volume with level of service A being relatively congestion-free and level of service E becoming congested. The current policy includes two-lane vehicle per hour volumes for each level of service and associated toll rates per mile. The RCTC 91 Express Lanes have single lane volume per hour constraints at the eastern and end of the facility. After 16 months of observation, it is theorized that the volume for each single lane of the facility is constrained and differs because of a shortened sight distance when entering the single lane, the switching of lanes and cutting into the queue prior to the merge or diverge by users, and the merging of traffic from the left at the westbound merge. During congested periods, motorists are slowing at the merge and diverge and once they enter the single-lane portion of the facility they do not regain speed at the rate expected. In the eastbound direction, customers retain a larger than standard headway, or distance between their vehicle and the vehicle in front of them reducing the vehicle capacity of the eastbound single lanes. It is theorized that after sitting in a slowed condition, customers are not confident that the increased speeds will be retained and react cautiously leaving a larger than standard distance between cars. In the westbound, it takes motorists approximately ½ mile to regain speed after the merge point although the two-lane portion of the facility ahead of them is free-flowing. Additionally, the number of vehicles per hour that each of the single lanes can process is not equal. To manage congestion in each single lane, it is necessary to set the toll rate according to the number of vehicles per hour for each single lane. Staff has analyzed the vehicle per hour capacity for each single lane of the facility and proposes revising the vehicles per hour for each level of service as follows: 3 Agenda Item 7 McKinley 15 South LOS Vehicles per Hour Toll* Toll* A 0 - 400 $1.50 $1.90 B 401 - 800 $2.20 $2.85 C 801 - 1,000 $4.05 $5.15 D 1,001 - 1,200 $5.15 $6.65 E (EB McKinley) 1,201 – 1,300 $6.70 n/a E (EB 15 South) 1,201 - 1,400 n/a $8.55 E (WB McKinley) 1,201 - 1,350 $6.70 n/a E (WB 15 South) 1,201 – 1,400 n/a $8.55 *Toll rates represent amounts as of July 1, 2018. Super-peak Volume Triggers During super-peak periods, demand exceeds the highest volume in the level of service table. In order to manage demand during these periods of high volume, the current toll policy provides for incremental toll increases when more than 3,200 vehicles per hour in the two-lane portion of the facility occur. In order to enact super-peak toll increases for the individual single-lane portions of the facility, it is being proposed that the volumes, which trigger a toll increase, be adjusted to match the single-lane volume capacity for each of the four single-lanes of the facility as follows: McKinley 15 South Eastbound 1,300 to 1,350 1,400 to 1,450 >1,350 >1,450 Westbound 1,350 to 1,400 1,400 to 1,450 >1,400 >1,450 The proposed volumes correspond with the capacity of each single-lane as determined through 16 months of analyzing the operation of each of the single lanes. When an average hourly traffic volume reaches the volume shown in the table above a toll rate increase is enacted. A lower volume level (e.g. 1,300-1,350) will trigger a lower toll rate increase than a higher volume level (e.g. >1,350) as specified in the super-peak toll adjustment amounts. If after a super-peak toll increase has been enacted, traffic drops below 1,200 vehicles per hour in the eastbound direction or 1,250 in the westbound direction a super-peak toll decrease would be enacted. These volumes represent the free-flow vehicle per hour condition for each direction of travel in the single-lane portion of the facility. Super-Peak Toll Adjustment Amounts The current toll policy allows for a super-peak toll increase in increments of $.75 or $1.00 depending on the average hourly daily traffic volume. The $.75 and $1.00 were in established in 2003 by OCTA and have not been adjusted for inflation. Inflation has diminished the impact of 4 Agenda Item 7 current allowable adjustments. Staff recommends the current $.75 be increased to $1.00 and the current $1.00 be increased to $1.30 to match the approximate 30 percent inflation increase between 2003 and 2018. There is currently a super-peak toll decrease of $.50 when the super-peak volumes decline. Like the super-peak toll increase, staff recommends the $.50 be increased to $.65 for the 30 percent inflation impact. This change will be sufficient to stimulate growth in traffic when needed. Annual Inflation Adjustment The current policy provides for an annual inflation adjustment, equal to the annual increase in the toll service provider lump sum contract, for tolls each year on July 1st. The current toll service provider contract provides for a 2 percent annual increase, which is not relevant to the value of money to a 91 Express Lanes user. Staff recommends tolls be adjusted annually on July 1st by an inflation adjustment tied to the Consumer Price Index for the region. The annual inflation amount will apply to the level of service toll rates, the super-peak toll rates, and the super-peak toll increase amount. Staff Recommendation The attached amended and restated toll policy recommends improvements to the methodology for adjusting toll rates to address characteristics unique to the RCTC 91 Express Lanes and the much higher than expected demand. In order to meet the toll policy goals of optimizing throughput at free flow speeds and balancing capacity and demand to serve customers who pay tolls as well as carpoolers who are offered discounted tolls, amendments to the toll policy are required. The chart below summarizes the current and recommended toll policy. Component Current Policy Recommended Policy 1. Level of Service hourly volumes Two-lane vehicle per hour volumes and toll rates for both directions Single lane vehicle per hour volumes for each eastbound and westbound direction 2. Super-peak volume triggers Two-lane vehicle per hour: Toll increase (1st trigger, 2nd trigger) 3,200 - 3,299, >3,300 Single-lane vehicle per hour: Toll increase (1st trigger, 2nd trigger) Eastbound McKinley 1,300 - 1,350, >1,350 15 South 1,400 – 1,450, >1,450 Westbound McKinley 1,350 – 1,400, >1,400 15 South 1,400 – 1,450, >1,450 5 Agenda Item 7 Toll decrease 2,720 Toll decrease Eastbound 1,200 Westbound 1,250 3. Super-peak toll adjustment amounts Increase $.75 and $1.00 Decrease $.50 Increase $1.00 and $1.30 Decrease $.65 4. Annual inflation adjustment Equal to Toll Service Provider contract increase Inflation adjustment tied to the region’s Consumer Price Index The changes outlined above and incorporated in the revised and restated toll policy provide a more accurate representation of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes operational constraints and corresponding toll setting needs. Therefore, staff recommends approval of Resolution 18-014, “Amended and Restated Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Regarding the RCTC 91 Express Lane Toll Policy”. Staff has begun analyzing the impact of the 15/91 Express Lanes Connector that is scheduled to open for operations in 2021-2022, on this 91 Express Lanes toll policy. Staff will return with a revised 91 Express Lanes toll policy recommended for approval prior to the opening of the 15/91 Express Lanes Connector. Attachments: 1) Resolution 18-014,“Amended and Restated Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Regarding the RCTC 91 Express Lane Toll Policy” 2) Amended and Restated RCTC 91 Express Lanes Toll Policy 6 RESOLUTION NO. 18-014 RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ADOPTING THE AMENDED AND RESTATED RCTC 91 EXPRESS LANES TOLL POLICY WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (the “Commission”) has been, in accordance with its legislative and regulatory authority, operating two tolled Express Lanes in Riverside County located between the Orange County Line and Interstate 15 (“RCTC 91 Express Lanes”); WHEREAS, the Commission adopted its original RCTC 91 Express Lanes Toll Policy on June 7, 2012; WHEREAS, the Commission retains the authority to add, delete, or otherwise modify its policies and procedures; WHEREAS, the Commission desires to amend and restate, in its entirety, the original RCTC 91 Express Lanes Toll Policy to address higher than expected traffic demand, traffic management in the single-lane portions of the facility, realized express lane capacity, and annual toll rate inflation adjustments. WHEREAS, the Commission provided notice of a public hearing regarding adoption of this Resolution in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with Government Code section 6062a. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Riverside County Transportation Commission as follows: Section 1. The Riverside County Transportation Commission hereby adopts the Amended and Restated RCTC 91 Express Lanes Toll Policy attached as Exhibit A. The details of the policy have been approved by the Commission, following the conduct of a public hearing, during its actions on October 10, 2018 and shall be communicated to the financial community, toll facility users, and the general public. ATTACHMENT 1 7 APPROVED AND ADOPTED this October 10, 2018. SIGNATURE PAGE TO RESOLUTION NO. 18-014 RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ADOPTING THE AMENDED AND RESTATED RCTC 91 EXPRESS LANES TOLL POLICY _____________________________________ Dana W. Reed, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ATTEST: _________________________________ Lisa Mobley Clerk of the Board 8 EXHIBIT A AMENDED AND RESTATED RCTC 91 EXPRESS LANES TOLL POLICY [attached behind this page] 9 05/09/2012 -1- EXHIBIT A RCTC 91 Express Lanes Toll Policy Adopted October 10, 2018 Goals The goals for the RCTC 91 Express Lanes toll policy are to: •Provide a safe, reliable, and predictable commute for 91 Express Lanes customers; •Optimize vehicle throughput at free flow speeds; •Pay debt service and maintain debt service coverage; •Increase average vehicle occupancy; •Balance capacity and demand to serve customers who pay tolls as well as carpoolers with three or more persons who are offered discounted tolls; •Generate sufficient revenue to sustain the financial viability of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes; •Ensure all covenants in the Financing Documents are met; and •Provide net revenues for Riverside Freeway/State Route 91 corridor improvements.1 Definitions Exhibit I, “Definitions”, clarifies terms used in this RCTC 91 Express Lanes Toll Policy. Super Peak Hours The toll adjustment goals for Super Peak hours are to: a) reduce the likelihood of congestion by diverting traffic to other hours with available capacity; b) maintain free flow travel speed in the RCTC 91 Express Lanes; c) maintain travel time savings; d) accommodate projected growth in travel demand and; e) ensure that the toll road generates sufficient revenue to effectively operate the toll lanes and maintain a strong debt service position. The toll for use of the RCTC 91 Express Lanes during a Super Peak hour shall be determined as follows: 1.Hourly and Daily Traffic Volumes will be monitored on a rolling 12-week period basis. The review period of 12 weeks may be reduced to a shorter period during times of Abnormal Traffic Volumes. In the case where traffic is stabilized for Super Peak hours, toll adjustments may be included in the Non-Super Peak for a quarterly adjustment. _________________________ 1 As allowable under Senate Bill 1316. ATTACHMENT 2 10 2. Hourly and Daily Traffic Volumes that exceed the Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume Increase Thresholds stated in the table below, will be flagged for further evaluation. Segment Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume Increase Thresholds EB McKinley 1,200 EB I-15 South 1,200 WB McKinley 1,250 WB I-15 South 1,250 3. Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume Increase Thresholds that are met six times in a 12- week period excluding Abnormal Traffic Volumes, shall have the Average Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume calculated and a toll increase will be applied according to the tables below: Eastbound McKinley Segment 15 South Segment Average Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume Toll Increase Amount Average Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume Toll Increase Amount >1,350 $1.30 >1,450 $1.30 1,300 to 1,350 $1.00 1,400 to 1,450 $1.00 See Exhibit II and III for the eastbound toll process flow. Westbound McKinley Segment 15 South Segment Average Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume Toll Increase Amount Average Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume Toll Increase Amount >1,400 $1.30 >1,450 $1.30 1,350 to 1,400 $1.00 1,400 to 1,450 $1.00 See Exhibit IV and V for the westbound toll process flow. 11 4. Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume Decrease Thresholds that fall below the volumes stated in the table below, will be flagged for further evaluation. Segment Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume Decrease Thresholds EB McKinley 1,200 EB I-15 South 1,200 WB McKinley 1,250 WB I-15 South 1,250 5. Hourly and Daily Traffic Volumes that fall below the Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume Decrease Thresholds six times in a 12-week period, excluding Abnormal Traffic Volumes, shall have the Average Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume calculated and a toll rate reduction applied according to the table below. Toll rates shall be reduced until pricing and volumes reduce to the non-super peak level of service (LOS) toll schedule. See Exhibit VI and VII for the toll reduction process flow. Non-Super Peak Hours Non-Super Peak hour toll rates will be set according to the vehicles per hour for single lane level of service (LOS) as set forth below. Toll rates were adopted on July 1, 2018 for each LOS reflecting the time-savings value to the driver as traffic moves into the next level of congestion. The adopted toll rates will increase annually by the Inflation Factor. Segment Hourly and Daily Traffic Volumes Toll Rate Reduction EB McKinley <1,200 $.65 EB I-15 South <1,200 $.65 WB McKinley <1,250 $.65 WB I-15 South <1,250 $.65 12 Level of Service Toll Schedule McKinley Toll* 15 South Toll* LOS Vehicles per Hour A 0 - 400 $1.50 $1.90 B 401 - 800 $2.20 $2.85 C 801 - 1,000 $4.05 $5.15 D 1,001 - 1,200 $5.15 $6.65 E (EB McKinley) 1,201 – 1,300 $6.70 n/a E (EB 15 South) 1,201 - 1,400 n/a $8.55 E (WB McKinley) 1,201 - 1,350 $6.70 n/a E (WB 15 South) 1,201 – 1,400 n/a $8.55 *Toll rates represents amounts as of July 1, 2018. Non-Super Peak Hourly and Daily Traffic Volumes will be reviewed on a quarterly basis beginning January 1, 2018. Non-super peak Hourly and Daily Traffic Volumes will be averaged for the quarter, excluding Abnormal Traffic Volumes. If the Average Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume varies from the currently priced LOS, the toll rate will be increased or decreased according to the Level of Service Toll Schedule table above. See Exhibit VIII (eastbound) and IX (westbound) for a non-super peak process flow. Discount Vehicles with three or more persons (HOV3+), zero emission vehicles (ZEVs), motorcycles, Department of Motor Vehicle issued disabled plates and disabled veteran plates are permitted to ride free in the RCTC 91 Express Lanes during most hours with valid a 91 Express Lanes Special Access Account. The exception is Monday through Friday 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. in the eastbound direction when these users pay 50 percent of the toll. Financing Requirements RCTC shall charge and collect tolls that generate enough revenue to maintain the Debt Service Coverage Ratios as required in the Financing Documents and to operate and maintain the RCTC 91 Express Lanes in a safe condition in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. RCTC recognizes that it must maintain a strong debt service position in order to satisfy the covenants in the Financing Documents. The requirement to maintain Debt Service Coverage Ratios and comply with Financing Document and other financing covenants will supersede the specific policies for setting and modifying tolls and discounts. Holiday Toll Schedules Holiday toll schedules will be established using actual traffic volumes for the prior year holiday and the Level of Service Toll Schedule. Interpretation These policies are intended as guidance and may be amended or superseded at any time. 13 Exhibit I Definitions Abnormal Traffic Volumes – Any week, day, or hour where traffic volumes vary from those of prior weeks due to a holiday, incident, construction or other atypical occurrence. Average Daily and Hourly Traffic Volume - The sum of a specific day, hour, segment and direction for the period of time analyzed divided by the number of days included in the sum. A calculated average may have a tolerance of the lessor amount of ±5% or 50 vehicles applied to it in the application of the toll rate adjustments. Cash Available for Debt Service – for any Period, the excess, if any, computed on a cash basis, of: (1) the amount of RCTC 91 Express Lanes cash receipts during such Period from whatever source, including, without limitation, toll receipts, transponder revenues, and investment earnings, excluding: − proceeds of insurance, − proceeds of debt service letter of credit or other amounts held in or disbursed from the payment account, the debt service reserve account, the coverage account and the major maintenance reserve account, and − the proceeds of any bonds or loans issued or executed to provide capital improvements to the RCTC 91 Express Lanes, over (2) All Operating and Maintenance Costs incurred during such Period and not deducted in the computation of Cash Available for Debt Service in a prior Period. In computing Operating and Maintenance Costs for any Period, an appropriate prorating will be made for expenditures such as insurance premiums and taxes that would be prorated if the computation were to be made in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Debt Service – for any Period, all payments of principal, interest, premiums (if any), fees and other amounts made (including by way of prepayment) or required to be made by RCTC during such Period under the Financing Documents (debt service payments related to RCTC’s internal subordinated debt borrowings or application of revenues to pay RCTC’s sales tax revenue bonds are to be excluded from these calculations). In computing Debt Service for any Period prior to the issuance of any additional financing, subject to the specific terms of the Financing Documents, RCTC will give pro forma effect to the transactions contemplated by the Financing Documents and the use of proceeds of the additional financing. In computing Debt Service for any prospective Period, RCTC will estimate in good faith such payments on the basis of reasonable assumptions. Such assumptions will include the absence of any waivers of or amendments to any agreements and the absence of any optional or extraordinary mandatory redemption of existing financings. Debt Service Coverage Ratio – defined specifically in the Financing Documents, which specific provisions control the implementation and setting of tolls and discounts, but generally, for any 14 Period, the ratio of Cash Available for Debt Service for such Period to Debt Service for such Period. Financing Documents – the documents under which RCTC has issued toll revenue bonds or other financings, including financings with TIFIA, payable primarily from toll revenues. Fiscal Year – July 1 to June 30 Holiday – Any of the following holidays that occur or are recognized any day between Monday through Friday: New Year’s Day, Memorial Day, 4th of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas. Other days where traffic volumes differ from the average hourly and daily traffic volumes, due to a recurring holiday, may be added to the holiday schedule. Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume – the traffic volume for an hour, day, direction and segment of the Express Lane. Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume Increase Threshold - The Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume Increase Thresholds are used to determine when a Super-peak hour shall receive a toll increase. The threshold amounts are equal to the optimal throughput for each single lane in the facility as determined by analysis of operational conditions at traffic volumes during the first 16 months of operation. The threshold amounts will be reviewed regularly but no less than annually and following a change to the roadway that may impact capacity either favorably or unfavorably. Thresholds for super-peak toll increases may be adjusted based on a review of traffic information. Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume Decrease Threshold – The Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume Decrease Thresholds are used to determine when a Super-peak hour shall receive a toll decrease. The threshold amounts are equal to the actual traffic volume deemed to be less than the optimal capacity for maximizing volume while maintaining free-flow conditions for each single lane of the facility. The threshold amounts will be reviewed annually and following a change to the roadway that may impact the optimal capacity either favorably or unfavorably. Thresholds for super-peak toll decreases may be adjusted based on a review of traffic information. Inflation Factor - The product of the hourly toll times the CPI Index Adjuster for the region from January to December of the previous calendar year. The Inflation Factor will be applied to all toll rates as of June 30th prior to the start of the new fiscal year, the Non-Super-peak level of service toll schedule, and the Super-peak toll increase and decrease amounts. All tolls will be rounded up or down to the nearest $.05. Non-Super Peak – Hourly period that is not Super-peak. Operating and Maintenance Costs – defined specifically in the Financing Documents, but generally, all reasonable and necessary expenses of administering, managing, maintaining and operating the RCTC 91 Express Lanes and in accordance with the operation and maintenance agreements. Period – Length of time referring to an hour, day, week or month. 15 Super Peak – Hourly period, per day, and per direction with traffic volume use which meets or exceeds the following volume thresholds: Segment Hourly and Daily Traffic Volume Thresholds EB McKinley 1,300 EB 15 South 1,400 WB McKinley 1,350 WB 15 South 1,400 Week – 12:00 a.m. Sunday to 11:59 p.m. the following Saturday. 16 BLANK Exhibit II Toll Policy Decision Process Super Peak Eastbound – McKinley 17 Exhibit III Toll Policy Decision Process Super Peak Eastbound – 15 SB 18 Exhibit IV Toll Policy Decision Process Super Peak Westbound – McKinley 19 Exhibit V Toll Policy Decision Process Super Peak Westbound – 15 SB 20 Exhibit VI Toll Policy Decision Process Toll Decrease – Eastbound 21 Exhibit VII Toll Policy Decision Process Toll Decrease – Westbound 22 Exhibit VIII Toll Policy Decision Process Non-Super Peak – Eastbound 23 Exhibit IX Toll Policy Decision Process Non-Super Peak – Westbound 24 Jennifer Crosson Toll Operations Manager RCTC 91 Express Lanes Toll Policy 91 Express Lanes Current Toll Policy •Adopted June 2012 •Time of Day Variable Pricing •Based on Orange County Transportation Authority Toll Policy 91 Express Lanes 91 Express Lanes Eastern End Single-lanes Proposed Changes to Toll Policy 1.Use single lane volumes 2.Increase Super –peak toll adjustment amount 3.Change in annual inflation basis 91 Express Lanes Path to Adoption •Toll Policy and Operations Committee in August 27, 2018 •SR-91 Joint Advisory Committee September 7, 2018 •Newspaper Publishing (September 28 and October 4, 2018) •Riverside County Transportation Commission (Today) 91 Express Lanes Questions? AGENDA ITEM 8A BLANK Agenda Item 8A RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: October 10, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Michele Cisneros, Deputy Director of Finance THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Quarterly Financial Statements STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file the Quarterly Financial Statements for the year ended June 30, 2018. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: During the fiscal year, staff monitored the revenues and expenditures/expenses for the Commission. The attached financial statements present the revenues and expenditures/expenses for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2017/18. Many accrual adjustments for revenues and expenditures/expenses have been made for the year ended June 30, 2018, and are reflected in these financial statements; however, staff will continue to make year-end accrual adjustments depending upon materiality through the completion of the audit in October 2018. The operating statement shows the sales tax revenues comprised of Measure A, Local Transportation Fund (LTF), and State Transit Assistance for the fourth quarter at 102 percent of the budget; however, this is primarily a result of State Transit Assistance revenues of $21.3 million, including State of Good Repair funding, exceeding the budget by 203.7 percent. The Commission recorded State Transit Assistance fund receipts through the third quarter and estimated a revenue accrual for the fourth quarter based on subsequent receipts. Measure A and LTF sales taxes are 97.4 and 98.4 percent of budgeted revenues, respectively, and only 0.6 and 1.5 percent, respectively, above the FY 2016/17 revenues. This seems inconsistent with staff’s tracking of Measure A and LTF revenues that, on a cash basis, are 4.23 and 7.25 percent higher, respectively, than the same period last fiscal year. Based on correspondence from the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) and with the Commission’s sales tax consultant, numerous paper filer sales tax returns for the first two quarters of calendar year 2018 remain unprocessed at the CDTFA. Although the CDTFA added a June 2018 advance to backfill some of the cash associated with the unprocessed payments, staff does not believe the backfill amount covers the shortfall from the unprocessed returns. Within the next few weeks, staff anticipates a reconciliation from its sales tax consultant of actual receipts and an estimate of the amount due from estimated unprocessed sales tax returns in order to determine the amount of any estimated sales tax revenues to be received related to 25 Agenda Item 8A FY 2017/18. Staff will continue to monitor the trends in the sales tax receipts and report to the Commission any necessary adjustments. Federal, state, and local reimbursements are generally on a reimbursement basis. The Commission will receive these revenues as eligible project costs are incurred and invoiced to the respective agencies. Significant federal and state reimbursements are related to the 71/91 connector project, Interstate (I) 15 Express Lanes, I-15 Express Lanes Connector, and Perris Valley Line. The following is an analysis of federal and state reimbursements reflected in this quarterly report: Budget Actual Budget Actual Highways 71/91 Connector $ 1,105,000 $ 1,072,918 $ - $ - I-15 Express Lanes 29,470,000 54,244,393 - - I-15 Express Lanes Connector - - 7,756,970 5,026,212 Pachappa Underpass 11,920,000 - - - Other 1,500,000 - 3,442,000 1,094,299 Total 43,995,000 55,317,311 11,198,970 6,120,511 Rail Perris Valley Line 13,244,500 5,726,521 1,496,700 487,790 Other Station Improvements 15,964,986 5,805,777 2,109,449 358,241 Total 29,209,486 11,532,298 3,606,149 846,031 Other 5,416,714 4,618,479 5,556,481 4,985,505 Total $ 78,621,200 $ 71,468,088 $ 20,361,600 $ 11,952,047 Federal Reimbursements State Reimbursements Staff will continue to prepare year-end reimbursement accrual adjustments in connection with the year-end closing and audit process. During the FY 2017/18 budget process and as per the mid-year budget revision, the Commission took a conservative approach to estimate the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) revenues of $21 million passed through from the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). The Commission recorded TUMF receipts through April 2018 and revenue accrual estimates for May and June based on subsequent receipts. TUMF revenues are 12.9 percent above the revised budgeted amount. The budgeted balance of $1,250,000 relates to TUMF zone reimbursements from WRCOG for the I-15/Railroad Canyon Interchange project in the city of Lake Elsinore; no reimbursements were received during FY 2017/18. Toll revenues budgeted at $14 million represents projected toll transactions for the first full year of RCTC 91 Express Lanes operations based on the Riverside County 91 Express Lanes Extension Investment Grade Traffic and Revenue Report and 2013 financing assumptions. The operating statement shows toll revenues at 302 percent of the budget and toll violations and fee revenues at 287 percent of the budget. The RCTC 91 Express Lanes toll transactions have exceeded initial 26 Agenda Item 8A expectations; accordingly, the Commission’s traffic consultant is updating the investment grade traffic and revenue study. Other revenues include proceeds from the return of leased vehicles and sale of excess land acquired in connection with the 91 Project, carpool violation fines, and property management revenues generated from various Commission-owned properties. The Commission took a conservative approach in estimating investment income for FY 2017/18 due to prior years’ flat interest yields on investment balances. Investment income is higher than the budgeted amount through the fourth quarter primarily because of the investment of sales tax revenues bond proceeds and increasing investment yields. Investment losses reflected in the Other Agency Projects fund and the Enterprise Fund are related primarily to unrealized losses based on the year end market value of investment securities. These amounts are expected to decrease in future quarters when the investment securities mature or are sold and when the market value of investment securities is reassessed. The expenditures/expenses and other financing sources/uses categories are in line overall with the expectations of the budget with the following exceptions: • Professional services are under budget primarily due to unused budget authority for highway and rail general legal services, public outreach activities, and rail operations and development activities; • Support costs are under budget primarily due to unused budget authority for rail maintenance and repair costs and toll operations costs; • Program operations are under budget due to unused budget authority for the 91 Project and I-15 Express Lanes project activities; toll operations, motorist and commuter assistance program operations; and highway and rail program management; • Capital project expenditures are generally affected by lags in invoices submitted by contractors and consultants, as well as other issues encountered during certain phases of the projects. The status of significant capital projects with budget exceeding $5 million is discussed in the attachment; • Operating and capital disbursements are made as claims are submitted to the Commission by transit operators; • Special studies unused budget authority relates to feasibilities studies; • Local streets and roads are related to the timing of Measure A sales tax revenue accrual adjustments. These financial statements reflect the collections through June except for a quarterly adjustment or “clean up” payment expected in September. This will have a direct effect on the local streets and roads turn-back expenditures to local jurisdictions; • Regional arterial expenditures primarily represent expenditures for the highways and regional arterial program administered by the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). CVAG requests reimbursements from the Commission based on available funds and sufficient budget authority; 27 Agenda Item 8A • Debt service principal payments are made annually on June 1, while debt service interest payments are made semiannually on December 1 and June 1, except for the variable rate 2009 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (2009 Bonds) as those interest payments were made monthly through March 2018. In April 2018, the 2018 Sales Tax Refunding Bonds (2018 Refunding Bonds) refinanced the variable rate 2009 Bonds with fixed rate bonds whereby interest will be paid semiannually. On a quarterly basis, the Commission records accrued interest on the SR-91 Project Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) loan and the 2013 Toll Revenue Bonds Series B (capital appreciation) in the RCTC 91 Express Lanes Enterprise Fund accounting records. However, such interest totaling $19.9 for the year was not paid in the current year and therefore not included in the FY 2017/18 budget. The FY 2017/18 budget includes $7.4 million related to the interest rate swap termination cost paid in connection with the issuance of the 2018 Refunding Bonds. • Cost of issuance relates to the underwriters’ discount paid for the 2017 Series A Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (2017A Bonds) issued for the I-15 Express Lanes project and 91 Project completion; the 2017 Series B Sales Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds (2017B Refunding Bonds) issued to refund all of the outstanding 2010 Series A Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (2010A Bonds) and a portion of the outstanding 2013 Series A Sales Tax Revenue Bonds (2013 Bonds); and the 2018 Refunding Bonds to refund all of the outstanding 2009 Bonds and pay an interest rate swap termination payment. Other costs incurred in connection with the bond issuance and refunding are reflected in professional services; • Payment to escrow agent relates to the advance refunding of all of the outstanding 2010A Bonds and a portion of the 2013 Bonds from the issuance of the 2017B Refunding Bonds and current refunding of all the outstanding 2009 Bonds from the issuance of the 2018 Refunding Bonds; • Capital outlay expenditures are under budget due to unused budget authority for station security improvements, office and property improvements for the I-15 Express Lanes project; and Commission office, network, hardware, and software improvements; • Depreciation is recorded as part of the year-end accrual adjustments in the RCTC 91 Express Lanes Enterprise Fund accounting records, however, such depreciation is not paid and therefore not included in the FY 2017/18 budget; • Loss on sale of land is recorded as part of the year-end accrual adjustments in the RCTC 91 Express Lanes Enterprise Fund accounting records, and reflects the loss on the sale of excess land purchased for the SR-91 Project. Loss on sale of land is not a cash-related item and therefore, not included in the FY 2017/18 budget; • Debt proceeds and bond premium include the issuance of $158,760,000 of 2017A Bonds at a premium of $28.9 million to pay a portion of the costs of the I-15 Express Lanes project and 91 project completion, retire $30 million of outstanding commercial paper notes, and pay costs of issuance, including the costs of the TIFIA loan related to the I-15 Express Lanes project; $392,730,000 of 2017B Refunding Bonds at a premium of $80 million to refund outstanding 2010A Bonds and 2013 Bonds; and $64,285,000 of 2018 Refunding Bonds at a premium of $10.7 million to refund outstanding 2009 Bonds; and 28 Agenda Item 8A • The Commission entered into a loan agreement with the U.S. Department of Transportation for a $152.5 million TIFIA loan to pay eligible I-15 Express Lanes project costs. Proceeds of the TIFIA loan may be drawn upon after certain conditions have been met. Through the fourth quarter, the Commission drew down $0 in TIFIA loan proceeds. During construction of the I-15 Express Lanes project and for a period of up to five years following substantial completion, interest is compounded and added to the TIFIA loan. TIFIA debt service payments are expected to commence June 2025, which is approximately five years after substantial completion of the I-15 Express Lanes project, through June 2055. Attachments: 1) Quarterly Project Status – June 2018 2) Quarterly Financial Statements – June 2018 29 BLANK RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY PROJECT STATUS 4TH QUARTER FOR TWELVE MONTHS ENDED 6/30/2018 FY 2017/18 BUDGET 4TH QUARTER EXPENDITURES Project Description Project Status 91 Project (P003028) $116,684,400 $61,617,438 The Design-Build contract achieved substantial completion on March 20, 2017. The Systems Integration and Implementation Contract retention was released on January 4, 2018. The Commission has remitted all of the $42 million final settlement to the Design-Builder; the only remaining costs are for the plant establishment period. The Certificate of Final Acceptance was issued to the Design-Builder on March 15, 2018. The under run of the FY 2017/18 budget at the fourth quarter is due to unused contingency for the Design-Build contract ($29M) and anticipated right of way (ROW) settlements that did not occur ($20M). The project connects with Orange County Transportation Authority’s tolled express lanes at the Orange County/Riverside County line and continues approximately eight miles to the Interstate (I)-15/State Route (SR)-91 interchange. The project involves widening pavement on the outside of the existing highway to reposition general purpose lanes and repurposing the existing high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes to accommodate two-tolled express lanes in the median in each direction. The 91 Project also involves constructing one new general purpose lane in each direction from SR-71 to I-15, ultimately providing two- tolled express lanes and five general purpose lanes in each direction. 91 Project development activities began in September 2007, construction work related to roadway and structures began in July 2014, and the toll lanes opened in March 2017. The total acquisition and construction cost of the 91 Project is estimated at $1.4 billion, including capitalized interest, debt service reserves, contingency, and cost of issuance. I-15 Express Lanes project (P003027) 128,161,400 92,799,690 The toll services provider (TSP) contract was awarded in January 2017, the Design-Build contract was awarded in April 2017, and the project financing was completed in July 2017. A project office in Corona opened in August 2017. All 11 Bridge Type Selection Reports have been approved. Overall design is approximately 90% complete. Negotiations continue with BNSF Railway for the construction and maintenance agreement. Soundwall S1-A was completed on June 1, 2018. Paving began on the Eastvale segment. Construction started on the Second and Third Street bridges. The concrete batch plant was installed. The under run of the FY 2017/18 budget at the fourth quarter is due to under runs in the Design-Build contract ($23 million), the project construction and management (PCM) contract ($9 million), the TSP contract ($4M), and Caltrans ($3 million). The primary reason for these under runs is due to the FY 2017/18 budgets were based on a draft I-15 CAPEX that assumed starting construction as early as possible. After the TSP and Design-Build contracts were executed and baseline schedules were established, more realistic expenditure timing was planned and incorporated into the FY 2018/19 budgets. The project will generally add two tolled express lanes in each direction from SR-60 to Cajalco Road in Corona. Project development activities began in April 2008, and lanes are expected to open to traffic in 2020. The 2017 Base Case estimates the total project cost at $471 million, which includes $42 million of contingency. ATTACHMENT 1 30 FY 2017/18 BUDGET 4th QUARTER EXPENDITURES Project Description Project Status 15/91 Express Lanes Connector (P003039) 9,366,570 5,027,707 In October 2017 the Commission approved an amendment to the existing I-15 Express Lanes PCM contract for ELC project approval and environmental document work. In November 2017 the Commission approved a contract with WSP USA, Inc. for ELC project management services. In January 2018 the Commission approved an amendment to the existing I-15 Express Lanes PCM contract for ELC PCM support. From April to June 2018 the Commission approved one amendment and two change orders to the existing Design-Builder contract for preliminary ELC design and geotechnical work. In March 2018 the Commission approved a change order to the existing TSP contract for ELC tolling software support. The under run of the FY 2017/18 budget at the fourth quarter is due to an under run in the PCM contract ($4M). The 15/91 Express Lane Connector (ELC) project constructs an express lanes median direct connector from southbound I-15 to westbound SR-91 and from eastbound SR-91 to northbound I-15 in the city of Corona. The project also adds tolled-express lanes in each direction of I-15 from the 15/91 ELC to Hidden Valley Parkway; adds a tolled-express lane in each direction of SR-91 from east of Lincoln Avenue to the 15/91 ELC; extends the tolled-express lane along eastbound SR-91 from I-15 to west of Promenade Avenue; and extends eastbound auxiliary lane along SR-91 from west of I-15 to west of Promenade Avenue. The project also includes the addition of a toll collection system infrastructure along I-15 and SR-91. The estimated project cost is $180 million and the project is funded by state funds allocated under Senate Bill 132. The project activities began in April 2017 and express lanes are expected to open to traffic in 2022. Mid County Parkway (P002302, P612302, P612320, & P612317) 40,911,800 23,218,998 The Commission approved the procurement for final design of the I- 215/Placentia Interchange in November 2016 and notice to proceed was issued the same month. Staff secured approval with the Federal Highway Administration of the New Connection Report. Staff continues to work on the approval of the Compensatory Mitigation Plan with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Staff continues the work on the Cultural Landscape Study for cultural resources mitigation. The Commission has acquired most of the mitigation land needed for the project. In July 2018 the Commission approved the procurement for final design of the Sweeney mitigation land. Staff continues to work on identifying the remaining mitigation land needed. Staff continues to work with state and federal agencies on permitting packages for the first construction contract. On June 29, 2018 settlement was reached with plaintiffs challenging the environmental document. The environmental document for a new corridor from I- 215 to SR-79 was approved in April 2015. The first design package is anticipated to be completed in FY 2018/19. Construction of this new facility will be completed over many years as funding becomes available; the project cost is estimated at $1.3 to $1.6 billion. Pachappa Underpass project (P003038) 13,090,400 218,634 ROW acquisition continues as well as preparation and review of the Construction and Maintenance Agreement with Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR). A few remaining design issues are under discussion by Caltrans and UPRR. The project will remove the Pachappa shoofly activities and construct the retaining wall, drainage, and track work for the permanent Pachappa underpass; the project construction cost is estimated at $12 million. FY 2017/18 BUDGET 4th QUARTER EXPENDITURES 31 Project Description Project Status Perris Valley Line and other rail projects (P003800, P003823, P003830, P003832, P003834) 22,907,900 2,746,583 The FTA awarded Small Starts Grant Agreement funds. ROW acquisition activities for the station and layover facility at south Perris have been completed. Following the settlement of a lawsuit challenging elements of the California Environmental Quality Act document in July 2013, the construction contract was given limited notice to proceed in October 2013 and full notice following FTA approval of the Small Starts Grant Agreement. Active construction commenced in January 2014. Metrolink operations commenced in June 2016. Substantial completion was reached in September 2016. Final completion was reached on October 20, 2017. Claim settlement was reached on January 24, 2018. The project extends commuter rail services to the city of Perris. The project commenced in December 2007 when the Commission received approval from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to move into project development. The estimated project cost is $248.3 million. Other rail projects include adding a fourth main track between the Riverside Downtown station to the connector to the San Jacinto Branch Line at Highgrove. This list discusses the significant capital projects (i.e., total budgeted costs in excess of $5 million) and related status. Capital project expenditures are generally affected by lags in invoices submitted by contractors and consultants, as well as issues encountered during certain phases of the projects. The capital projects budgets tend to be based on aggressive project schedules. 32 BLANK Revenues Sales tax 282,469,000$ 287,164,248$ 4,695,248$ 102% Federal reimbursements 78,621,200 71,468,088 (7,153,112)91% State reimbursements 20,361,600 11,952,047 (8,409,553)59% Local reimbursements 6,840,100 5,464,147 (1,375,953)80% Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee 22,250,000 23,699,764 1,449,764 107% Toll revenues 13,979,500 42,249,159 28,269,659 302% Toll violations and fee revenues 2,856,300 8,197,608 5,341,308 287% Other revenues 2,803,700 2,522,266 (281,434)90% Investment income 3,509,400 9,117,009 5,607,609 260% Total revenues 433,690,800 461,834,336 28,143,536 106% Expenditures/Expenses Salaries and benefits 9,554,200 8,840,316 713,884 93% Professional and support Professional services 22,782,700 14,249,799 8,532,901 63% Support costs 11,630,110 7,245,989 4,384,121 62% Total Professional and support costs 34,412,810 21,495,788 12,917,022 62% Projects and operations Program operations - general 28,072,990 24,298,827 3,774,163 87% Engineering 14,850,100 8,155,029 6,695,071 55% Construction 76,775,100 20,269,353 56,505,747 26% Design Build 193,220,570 139,231,582 53,988,988 72% Right of way/land 87,705,600 39,048,152 48,657,448 45% Operating and capital disbursements 154,480,600 111,696,224 42,784,376 72% Special studies 4,052,000 1,458,281 2,593,719 36% Local streets and roads 54,085,000 53,176,798 908,202 98% Regional arterials 30,416,000 15,736,433 14,679,567 52% Total projects and operations 643,657,960 413,070,679 230,587,281 64% Debt service Principal 62,141,000 62,144,857 (3,857) 100% Interest 57,861,943 77,718,123 (19,856,180) 134% Cost of issuance 5,057,016 2,256,061 2,800,955 45% Payment to escrow agent 541,889,841 541,889,840 1 100% Total debt service 666,949,800 684,008,881 (17,059,081) 103% Capital outlay 6,917,500 2,937,789 3,979,711 42% Depreciation - 10,185,622 (10,185,622) N/A Loss on sale of land - 376,656 (376,656) N/A Total Expenditures/Expenses 1,361,492,270 1,140,915,731 220,576,539 84% Excess revenues over (under) expenditures/expenses (927,801,470) (679,081,395) 230,072,565 73% Other financing sources/(uses) Transfer in 314,266,500 323,045,478 8,778,978 103% Transfer out (314,266,500) (323,045,478) (8,778,978) 103% Debt proceeds 636,250,000 615,775,000 (20,475,000) 97% TIFIA loan proceeds 81,810,000 - (81,810,000) N/A Bond premium 119,722,000 119,713,807 (8,193) 100% Total financing sources/(uses)837,782,000 735,488,807 102,293,193 88% Net change in fund balances (90,019,470) 56,407,412 332,365,758 -63% Fund balance July 1, 2017 687,463,600 412,734,228 (274,729,372) 60% Fund balance June 30, 2018 597,444,130$ 469,141,640$ 57,636,386$ 79% RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY BUDGET TO ACTUAL FY 2017/18 BUDGET 4TH QUARTER ACTUAL PERCENT UTILIZATION REMAINING BALANCE FOR TWELVE MONTHS ENDED 6/30/2018 4TH QUARTER ATTACHMENT 2 33 BLANK OTHER AGENCY PROJECTS SB132 Revenues Sales tax -$ -$ 136,852,833$ 38,512,321$ 936,502$ 89,557,646$ 21,304,946$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Federal reimbursements 4,226,903 - 63,853,668 - - - - - 602,224 - - State reimbursements 1,197,940 3,625,124 1,787,689 - - - - - - - 5,341,294 Local reimbursements 505,106 526,136 2,822,542 - - 185 - 1,314,997 - 295,181 - Transportation Uniform Mitigation F - - - - - - - 23,699,764 - - - Toll revenues - - - - - - - - - - - Toll violations and fee revenues - - - - - - - - - - - Other revenues 31,538 1,257 2,464,259 - - - - 25,155 - - - Investment income 138,418 69,664 2,474,963 434,802 1 825,116 621,033 664,023 27,324 (433) 7,793 Total revenues 6,099,905 4,222,181 210,255,954 38,947,123 936,503 90,382,947 21,925,979 25,703,939 629,548 294,748 5,349,087 Expenditures/Expenses Salaries and benefits 4,647,144 123,729 3,019,757 1,849 - - - 242,868 11,905 65,604 217,040 Professional and support Professional services 3,211,823 352,312 6,808,888 47,355 - - 16,542 407,885 838,836 25,274 800,963 Support costs 3,535,374 290,970 614,660 73 - - - 3,596 - 928 2,472 Total Professional and support costs 6,747,197 643,282 7,423,548 47,428 - - 16,542 411,481 838,836 26,202 803,435 Projects and operations Program operations - general 2,501,307 2,848,909 11,806,167 - - - - 293,709 - 169,552 17,537 Engineering - - 3,296,635 - - - - 2,818,158 - 124,671 1,915,565 Construction - - 13,954,454 - - - - 6,314,899 - - - Design Build - - 136,785,676 - - - - - - - 2,445,906 Right of way/land - - 20,660,291 - - - - 18,302,127 - 85,734 - Operating and capital disburseme 17,843,025 - 9,005,300 5,153,400 - 74,508,599 5,185,900 - - - - Special studies 1,458,281 - - - - - - - - - - Local streets and roads - - 39,005,484 13,271,812 899,502 - - - - - - Regional arterials - - - 15,736,433 - - - - - - - Total projects and operations 21,802,613 2,848,909 234,514,007 34,161,645 899,502 74,508,599 5,185,900 27,728,893 - 379,957 4,379,008 Debt service Principal 24,857 - - - - - - - - - - Interest - - - - - - - - - - - Cost of issuance - - - - - - - - - - - Payment to escrow agent - - - - - - - - - - - Total debt service 24,857 - - - - - - - - - - Capital outlay 429,652 - 2,188,490 - - - - - - - - Depreciation - - - - - - - - - - - Loss on sale of land - - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures/Expenses 33,651,463 3,615,920 247,145,802 34,210,922 899,502 74,508,599 5,202,442 28,383,242 850,741 471,763 5,399,483 Excess revenues over (under) expenditures/expenses (27,551,558) 606,261 (36,889,848) 4,736,201 37,001 15,874,348 16,723,537 (2,679,303) (221,193) (177,015) (50,396) Other financing sources/(uses) Transfer in 36,638,975 1,083,600 177,335,532 159,403 - 436,100 - 235,941 226,800 - - Transfer out (1,943,900) (1,293,400) (99,058,075) (618,800) (37,000) (21,268,275) (329,600) (620,200) (47,700) - (195,300) Debt proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - TIFIA loan proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - Bond premium - - - - - - - - - - - Total financing sources/(uses)34,695,075 (209,800) 78,277,457 (459,397) (37,000) (20,832,175) (329,600) (384,259) 179,100 - (195,300) Net change in fund balances 7,143,517 396,461 41,387,609 4,276,804 1 (4,957,827) 16,393,937 (3,063,562) (42,093) (177,015) (245,696) Fund balance July 1, 2017 19,126,100 8,842,499 221,510,954 47,791,274 556 115,175,281 75,432,832 81,473,550 3,308,418 180,162 (23,054) Fund balance June 30, 2018 26,269,617$ 9,238,960$ 262,898,563$ 52,068,078$ 557$ 110,217,454$ 91,826,769$ 78,409,988$ 3,266,325$ 3,147$ (268,750)$ STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS GENERAL FUND FSP/ SAFE WESTERN COUNTY PALO VERDE VALLEY COACHELLA VALLEY RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY BUDGET TO ACTUAL BY FUND 4TH QUARTER FOR TWELVE MONTHS ENDED 6/30/2018 MEASURE A SALES TAX TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT COACHELLA VALLEY RAIL 34 Revenues Sales tax Federal reimbursements State reimbursements Local reimbursements Transportation Uniform Mitigation F Toll revenues Toll violations and fee revenues Other revenues Investment income Total revenues Expenditures/Expenses Salaries and benefits Professional and support Professional services Support costs Total Professional and support costs Projects and operations Program operations - general Engineering Construction Design Build Right of way/land Operating and capital disburseme Special studies Local streets and roads Regional arterials Total projects and operations Debt service Principal Interest Cost of issuance Payment to escrow agent Total debt service Capital outlay Depreciation Loss on sale of land Total Expenditures/Expenses Excess revenues over (under) expenditures/expenses Other financing sources/(uses) Transfer in Transfer out Debt proceeds TIFIA loan proceeds Bond premium Total financing sources/(uses) Net change in fund balances Fund balance July 1, 2017 Fund balance June 30, 2018 ENTERPRISE FUND TOLL OPERATIONS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 287,164,248$ - - - - 2,785,293 71,468,088 - - - - - 11,952,047 - - - - - 5,464,147 - - - - - 23,699,764 42,249,159 - - - - 42,249,159 8,197,608 - - - - 8,197,608 57 - - - - 2,522,266 (32,662) 1,657,774 1,987,869 824 240,500 9,117,009 50,414,162 1,657,774 1,987,869 824 3,025,793 461,834,336 510,420 - - - - 8,840,316 815,344 - 924,577 - - 14,249,799 2,793,274 - 4,642 - - 7,245,989 3,608,618 - 929,219 - - 21,495,788 6,661,646 - - - - 24,298,827 - - - - - 8,155,029 - - - - - 20,269,353 - - - - - 139,231,582 - - - - - 39,048,152 - - - - - 111,696,224 - - - - - 1,458,281 - - - - - 53,176,798 - - - - - 15,736,433 6,661,646 - - - - 413,070,679 - 30,000,000 - - 32,120,000 62,144,857 27,115,096 37,485 7,526,000 - 43,039,542 77,718,123 - - 2,256,061 - - 2,256,061 - - 538,056,507 - 3,833,333 541,889,840 27,115,096 30,037,485 547,838,568 - 78,992,875 684,008,881 319,647 - - - - 2,937,789 10,185,622 - - - - 10,185,622 376,656 - - - - 376,656 48,777,705 30,037,485 548,767,787 - 78,992,875 1,140,915,731 1,636,457 (28,379,711) (546,779,918) 824 (75,967,082) (679,081,395) 30,000,000 8,700,000 216,954 68,012,173 323,045,478 (749,556) (26,995,887) (165,597,758) (1,345,332) (2,944,695) (323,045,478) - - 615,775,000 - - 615,775,000 - - - - - - - - 119,713,807 - - 119,713,807 (749,556) 3,004,113 578,591,049 (1,128,378) 65,067,478 735,488,807 886,901 (25,375,598) 31,811,131 (1,127,554) (10,899,604) 56,407,412 (293,678,840) 46,951,913 63,532,514 1,127,554 21,982,515 412,734,228 (292,791,939)$ 21,576,315$ 95,343,645$ -$ 11,082,911$ 469,141,640$ CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS TOLL REVENUE BONDS RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION QUARTERLY BUDGET TO ACTUAL BY FUND 4TH QUARTER FOR TWELVE MONTHS ENDED 6/30/2018 SALES TAX BONDS DEBT SERVICE COMBINED TOTALCOMMERCIAL PAPER 35 AGENDA ITEM 8B BLANK Agenda Item 8B RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: October 10, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee David Thomas, Toll Project Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Change Order to Amend the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project Design-Build Contract with Skanska-Ames, a Joint Venture, for the Interstate 15/State Route 91 Express Lanes Connector Project WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve Change Order No. 10 to Agreement No. 16-31-057-00 for the Interstate 15 Express Lanes Project (I-15 ELP) with Skanska-Ames, a Joint Venture (Skanska-Ames), to perform final engineering design work and limited construction within the limits of the I-15 ELP to accommodate the I-15/State Route 91 Express Lanes Connector Project (15/91 ELC) in the amount of $15,234,804, plus a contingency amount of $750,000, for a total amount not to exceed $15,984,804; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the change order amendment on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total amount not to exceed as required for the project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In April 2017 Governor Brown signed Senate Bill 132 (SB 132), which appropriated $427 million to the Riverside County Transportation Efficiency Corridor (RCTEC) for five projects. SB 132 allocated $180 million to the 15/91 ELC project. The 15/91 ELC project will provide a tolled express lanes connector between the existing 91 Express Lanes and the future I-15 Express Lanes to the north of SR-91 (Figure 1 Vicinity Map). A detailed vicinity map of the 15/91 ECL project is also provided as Attachment 1. 36 Agenda Item 8B Figure 1: 15/91 Express Lanes Connector Project Vicinity Map SB 132 also statutorily created a task force to develop recommendations to accelerate project delivery of the RCTEC projects. On June 27, 2017, Governor Brown signed budget trailer bill Assembly Bill 115 (AB 115) through which the Commission received additional project delivery authority to ensure cost-effective and timely delivery of the 15/91 ELC. At its October 2017 meeting, the Commission approved an overall procurement strategy for the 15/91 ELC to secure all the services and construction needed to deliver the project. The approved strategy consists of a series of contract amendments, as permitted by AB 115, to existing 91 Project and I-15 ELP contracts with engineering companies, contractors, toll vendors, legal, and financial advisors. DISCUSSION: At the April 12, 2017 Commission meeting, following a competitively negotiated procurement, the Commission awarded a best-value design-build contract to Skanska-Ames to design and construct the I-15 ELP in the amount of $243,900,000, plus a contingency amount of $19,512,000, for a total amount not to exceed $263,412,000. Based on the overall procurement strategy approved for the 15/91 ELC, staff supports a change order to amend the I-15 ELP design-build contract with Skanska-Ames to perform the following work needed for implementation of the 15/91 ELC project: 37 Agenda Item 8B • Final engineering design work to prepare release for construction (RFC) documents for outside widening near Hidden Valley Parkway; and • Construction of median and outside improvements near Hidden Valley Parkway. This effort is to perform final engineering design work and construction within the limits of the I-15 ELP to accommodate the 15/91 ELC in advance of the planned overall design-build services amendment for the 15/91 ELC with Skanska-Ames. This effort will avoid impacts to the I-15 ELP and reduce the cost and impacts associated with performing this work at a later date. Staff negotiated Change Order No. 10 (see Attachments 2 and 3) in the amount of $15,234,804 for this effort. The table below summarizes the status of 15/91 ELC related change orders and amendments to the Skanska-Ames contract. Skanska-Ames 15/91 ELC Related Amendments/Change Orders Status Amount Contingency Total Change Order No. 5 – Early geotechnical work and staff support Commission approved on April 11, 2018 $1,790,000 $ 179,000 $1,969,000 Amendment No. 2 – Preliminary Engineering Commission approved on May 9, 2018 4,718,800 471,200 5,190,000 Change Order No. 6 – Final Design for median improvements near Hidden Valley Parkway Commission approved on June 13, 2018 2,891,000 289,100 3,180,100 Change Order No. 10 – Final Design for outside widening and construction for improvements near Hidden Valley Parkway (subject of this report) For Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee approval on Sept. 24, 2018 15,234,804 750,000 15,984,804 Totals $24,634,604 $1,689,300 $26,323,904 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 10 to amend the design-build contract between the Commission and Skanska-Ames in the amount of $15,234,804, plus a contingency amount of $750,000, for a total amount of $15,984,804. Further, authorization is requested for the Chair or Executive Director to execute the amendment on behalf of the Commission and for the 38 Agenda Item 8B Executive Director or designee to approve contingency work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for the project. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes N/A Year: FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20+ Amount: $ 3,000,000 $12,984,804 Source of Funds: SB 132 State Funds Budget Adjustment: No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 003039 81603 00000 0000 605 31 81601 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 09/14/2018 Attachments: 1) Detailed Vicinity Map for the I-15/SR-91 Express Lanes Connector 2) I-15 ELP Change Order No. 10 3) Skanska-Ames Cost Breakdown 39 SR-91 CIP APE LEGEND INTERSTATE CALIFORNIA 15 RI V E R R d RI V E R R d BELLE AveRAMONA AveVICTORIA AveVICENTIA AveSHERIDAN AveBELLE AveRAMONA AveVICTORIA AveVICENTIA AveSHERIDAN AveBN SF RA ILROAD BN SF RA ILROAD 6TH St QUARRY StQUARRY St 6TH St EL CAMINO AveEL CAMINO AveCORONA Ave CORONA Ave SECOND St FIRST StFIRST St SECOND St JOY StMAIN StCOTA StCOTA StMAIN StJOY StHAM MER AveHAM MER AveevA EGDIRKRAPevA EGDIRKRAP y w kP YE LLAV NEDDIH y w kP YE LLAV NEDDIH T E MESCAL WASH TEMESCAL WASH evA EDANEMORP evA EDANEMORPP A R K RI D G E A ve P A R K RI D G E A ve dvlB DNARG dvlB DNARG LANE CONNECTOR I-15/SR-91 EXPRESS Pkwy WIDENING HIDDEN VALLEY INTERSTATE CALIFORNIA 15 NORTH PROPOSED RE-STRIPING PROPOSED STRUCTURE SR-91 PM 6.6 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION SR-91 PM 8.1 END CONSTRUCTION I-15 PM 43.4 END CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED ROADWAY WIDENING UC WIDENING CORONA Ave I-15/SR-91 EXPRESS LANE CONNECTOR LINCOLN AveLINCOLN AveCOUNLTY LINE NORTH 91 I-15 PM 41.5 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION EAST END EXTENSION ATTACHMENT 1 40 BLANK Riverside County Transportation Commission I-15 ELP Design-Build Contract Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 Change Order Number 10 Page 1 of 6 79 I-15 ELP PROJECT CHANGE ORDER CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 10 CONTRACT NO. 16-31-057-00 DATE: XX XX, 2018 SECTION I: Title: Improvements at Hidden Valley Parkway Company Name: Skanska-Ames a Joint Venture (DB Contractor) Description: I-15 median and outside improvements at Hidden Valley Parkway for the 15/91 Express Lanes Connector (ELC) Additions/Deletions/Modifications to Contract Document requirements: Adding Technical Provision Section 11.3 Augmented Pavement Structural Section Design (See CCO-10 Exhibit B attached hereto) Scope: DB Contractor shall provide any and all supervision, labor, equipment, materials, traffic control, and other services necessary to perform the following scope of work. This Contract Change Order (CCO) Work includes the following activities for Hidden Valley Parkway median improvements required to accommodate the 15/91 Express Lanes Connector, including updates to the reports and plans to be submitted following the Notice of Design Change (NDC) process. This Change Order includes (Release For Construction) RFC design and construction for the Hidden Valley Parkway widening and improvements on I-15 required to accommodate the 15/91 Express Lanes Connector. Exhibit A depicts the preliminary design for the Hidden Valley Parkway Widening work that the DB Contractor is currently preparing pre-RFC design pursuant to Contract Change Order Number 6 (CCO #6). Design-Builder will not alter the location for edge of shoulder, alignments, pavement width, and structure width from those depicted in Exhibit A. This Change Order includes the work to obtain Commission and Department approval on a Release for Construction (RFC) package for the Hidden Valley Parkway widening work. The work depicted must be completed without impacting the Completion Deadline of the I-15 Express Lanes Project (ELP). RCTC is obtaining environmental approval for the outside widening of I-15. The RFC for the outside widening of I-15 cannot receive approval until the environmental approval is obtained. The environmental approval is expected to be received on March 15, 2019. Construction for the outside widening cannot begin prior to the environmental statute of limitations period expires. The environmental statute of limitations is expected to end on May 3, 2019. All work within this CCO must be completed by the ELP Substantial Completion date. These dates shall be considered as RCTC provided approvals. ATTACHMENT 2 41 Riverside County Transportation Commission I-15 ELP Design-Build Contract Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 Change Order Number 10 Page 2 of 6 79 Task 1 Project Management 1.1 General Work Management DB Contractor shall implement and maintain the project management organization and systems that effectively manage all elements of this Change Order. DB Contractor shall follow the management effort as established in the Project Management Plan. Progress Reports and invoices for the work associated with this Change Order shall be kept separate from other work performed under the Contract. Invoices for this work should be separate from ELP work and submitted in the template provided by Amendment #2 and incorporated into a single ELC invoice. 1.2 Quality Program DB Contractor is solely responsible for performance and documentation of the quality of all components of the work identified under this Change Order. DB Contractor shall maintain its own internal quality control staff and contract for all quality assurance services in the same manner as required for the Project under the Contract. 1.3 Governmental Approvals DB Contractor is responsible for obtaining necessary Encroachment Permits from the Department to perform construction tasks under this Change Order. DB Contractor is responsible for preparing and obtaining approval for traffic control plans and providing traffic control as necessary to perform the work under this change order. Task 2 Coordination 2.1 Environmental DB Contractor shall ensure that the construction under this Change Order complies with the environmental commitments reflected in the I-15 Final Environmental Document and all other applicable Governmental Approvals as well as supplemental commitments under development for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Program Environmental document which is being revalidated by RCTC. RCTC and DB Contractor will evaluate the final supplemental commitments developed in the State Route Improvement Program revalidation to determine if there are any scope changes required. The State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Program environmental document and environmental commitments records were transmitted as attachments to Amendment 2 of the contract. 42 Riverside County Transportation Commission I-15 ELP Design-Build Contract Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 Change Order Number 10 Page 3 of 6 79 2.2 Toll System Coordination DB Contractor shall coordinate with the Toll System Provider any work associated with this Change Order. 2.3 Utility Coordination DB Contractor shall coordinate with Utility Owners to finalize existing Utility mapping and identify potential Utility conflicts for purposes of the design and construction of this Change Order. DB Contractor shall coordinate with respective Utility Owners to pothole their facilities and positively identify Utility conflicts and show existing and proposed utility relocations on the utility plans. DB Contractor shall perform on-going utility coordination for work related to this Change Order before and during construction. Task 3 Structures 3.1 Structures Design DB Contractor shall update the pre-RFC design developed under CCO #6 to final RFC for the structures listed below including the Final Design Package submittals. The RFC design shall follow the requirements of the Final Design Package per TP Sections 3.3.1.5 and 3.3.3.5. 3.1.1 Corona Avenue Undercrossing Widening 3.1.2 RW#7 – Retaining Wall Below Hidden Valley Parkway 3.1.3 RW#8 - Retaining Wall along Hidden Valley Parkway On-ramp Task 4 Civil Design 4.1 Hidden Valley Parkway Outside Widening 4.1.1 Storm Water Data Report (SWDR) DB Contractor shall finalize the amended ELP SWDR developed under CCO #6 for the Hidden Valley Parkway outside widening for review and approval by the Department. DB Contractor shall identify the new impervious surface area and identify BMPs. 4.1.2 Stage Construction and Maintenance of Traffic Analysis DB Contractor shall execute ELC and ELP interface plan developed in CCO #6 to determine how the ELP delivery will interface with the ELC construction, including construction access. 43 Riverside County Transportation Commission I-15 ELP Design-Build Contract Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 Change Order Number 10 Page 4 of 6 79 4.1.3 Roadway Design DB Contractor shall finalize RFC design developed in CCO #6 for the widening at Hidden Valley Parkway required to accommodate the ELC. The following design sheets will be included with the Final Design Package submittal. The RFC design shall follow the requirements of TP Sections 3.3.1.5 and 3.3.3.5. 4.1.4 Typical Sections 4.1.5 Roadway Layout Sheets 4.1.6 Profile Sheets 4.1.7 Construction Details 4.1.8 Contour Grading Sheets 4.1.9 Drainage Design Sheets 4.1.9.1 Drainage Plan 4.1.9.2 Drainage Profile 4.1.9.3 Drainage Details 4.1.10 Utility Sheets 4.1.11 Construction Area Signs 4.1.12 Stage Construction/Traffic Handling 4.1.13 Pavement Delineation and Sign 4.1.14 Landscaping Sheets 4.1.14.1 Plant List 4.1.14.2 Planting Plan 4.1.14.3 Irrigation Removals and Construction 4.1.15 Electrical Sheets 4.1.16 RW#7 – Retaining Wall Below Hidden Valley Parkway 4.1.17 RW#8 - Retaining Wall along Hidden Valley Parkway On-ramp 4.2 As-built drawings DB Contractor shall prepare as-built drawings in accordance with TP Section 3.4.4 for all of the work developed under CCO 6 and this CCO. Task 5 Construction 5.1 Furnish Materials DB Contractor shall furnish materials required to complete construction of the work developed under this CCO and in accordance with all relevant TP Sections. 5.2 Construct Freeway and Bridge Improvements DB Contractor shall construct the freeway improvements and all associated work developed under this CCO and in accordance with all relevant TP Sections. Exhibit B includes Revised TP Sections for this change order. For the purposes of this change order it assumed that roadway excavation can be placed within the 15/91 44 Riverside County Transportation Commission I-15 ELP Design-Build Contract Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 Change Order Number 10 Page 5 of 6 79 Express Lanes Connector project limits as defined in Amendment 2. This change order compensates DB Contractor for all cost and time related impacts due to this change. SECTION II: Change Order Cost increase☒ decrease☐ none☐ Total Change Order Cost shall not exceed $15,234,804 45 BLANK Riverside County Transportation Commission I-15 ELP Design-Build Contract Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 Change Order Number 10 Page 6 of 6 79 SECTION III: Time Impact The status of all Completion Milestones is: 0 Days (No Adjustment) SECTION IV: CHANGE REQUESTED BY: RCTC ☒ DB CONTRACTOR ☐ SECTION V: Certification and Other Acknowledgments I, , the Authorized Representative of DB Contractor, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the above four sections represent a true, accurate and complete summary of all aspects of this Change Order, and that (a) the amount of time and/or compensation requested will be justified as to entitlement and amount, (b) the amount of time and/or compensation requested will include all known and anticipated impacts or amounts, direct, indirect and consequential, which may be incurred as a result of the event, occurrence or matter giving rise to the proposed change (and includes all Subcontractor and Supplier amounts), and (c) the cost and pricing data forming the basis for this Change Order is complete, accurate and current, with specific reference to the California False Claims Act (Government Code section 1250 et seq.) and the U.S. False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. section 3729 et seq.). It is understood and agreed that this Change Order shall not alter or change, in any way, the force and effect of the Contract Documents, including any previous amendment(s) thereto, except insofar as the same is expressly altered and amended by this Change Order. This Change Order supersedes all prior commitments, negotiations, correspondence, conversations, agreements or understanding applicable to the issues addressed herein. No deviation from the terms hereof shall be predicated upon any prior representations or agreements, whether oral or written, other than the Agreement, as amended in accordance with its terms. This Change Order is binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, each of the parties and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, DB Contractor, intending to be legally bound, has executed this Change Order as of the date below. 46 Riverside County Transportation Commission I-15 ELP Design-Build Contract Contract Number: 16-31-057-00 Change Order Number 10 Page 7 of 6 79 DB Contractor: Skanska-Ames a Joint Venture By: Name: Title: Dated as of: SECTION VI (Reviewed and recommended agreed by RCTC Project Manager): By: Name: Title: Dated as of: Comments: SECTION VII (Agreed by RCTC’s Authorized Representative): IN WITNESS WHEREOF, RCTC, intending to be legally bound, has executed this Change Order as of the date first written above. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: Name: Title: Dated as of: By: Name: Title: Dated as of: 47 717.7 211433 612.4 211443 608.2 211444 649.5 211453 612.4 641.4 211462 607.3 634.8 221482 CP8143CP8144CP8145UBUB ASPHASPHASPH 651.2 649.7 654.5 656.4 641.8 655.0 664.4 661.5 673.3 672.3 656.7 663.6 646.3 638.7 663.0 663.1 663.5 663.6 637.8 636.5 612.1 606.7 604.3 606.7 604.8 609.0 616.9 617.1 623.0 622.9 620.8 619.4 616.5 640.3 639.5 625.5 639.0 642.5 631.1 625.0 657.6 651.7 648.7 648.9 641.1 636.3 HV-59640 670720 710710 650600610 6206206406506 6 0 660670680 70 0 620610 610 620620620630630630630630630630630630640650 640 630 604.1 BR USHUBASPHUBUBUBDI RT DENS E TREESBRUSH BRUSH BR USH629.5242410630.85HV-135625.7544120DE NSE TR EESDEN SE TREESCONCCONC TSTSTSTS6306356206 5 0 645650 635 64 0635 6 3 0 620625630625630645 640 6356 3 5 635 630 62563062062563063564 5640635630625620645 6 2 0 615625630635640 630 640 635 635635620630 635 640645 645 635640 62 0625615 620625 61 5615615 62 0625 630 635 63562563063563565062 5 PPPPPPPPPPPPBRUSHDENSE TREES625625 630615 620 625 630 61 5615.5611.1611.2623.4637.7620.4624.4622.6611.6614.3617.5616.4631.2632.5610.6612.3613.8616.7620.9627.8629.1630.3632.7633.6646.4645.3646.3619.5639.3617.7618.8627.2628.4618.3618.3645.6640.3620.1649.3640.4638.7620.5615.5650.6629.4625.1626.2645.3646.6614.7613.6642.6611.3619.6629.5621.4620.7620.3627.6 629.5242410625.7544120616.7 618.7 729.4 607.6 607.2 609.3 634.8 612.8 605.1 642.3 636.9 635.3 634.7 637.2 651.3 651.6 609.3 602.6 601.6 612.3 626.3 631.8 617.4 615.0 613.9 622.3 615.6 610.8 630.4 634.6 635.1 636.2 632.7 635.4 634.6 634.6 635.1 632.9 630.3 634.6 634.3 633.5 634.9 634.9 634.7 634.7 630.7 610.9 590.6 592.9 615.1 617.6 619.1 627.4 627.5 639.6 615.7 600 60 06406206606107207207 10 65064060 0 610610630 640640640650650660 66 0 660660660660670 67 0 680680 690 690690700700 6206 2 0 62063 0630 610 610610610 6206206206206206206306306 30 630630630630630640640650650650650650630CONCAS P HASPH CONC AS P HASPH ASPHASPHASPHASPH ASPHASPHOBSCURED AREAP P PP P P P P PPPPPX 6 164 000 UBUBUBUBTSTSUBUBUBUBTSTSTSTSUBUBUB UBUB TS TSTSTSUBUBUBUBTSTSTSTSUB UBUBUB CB8640 640 640640640 640 640640640650650650650 650 650 650650650 650 660 660660660UBUBUBUB607.2221483 610610 610610610610 610 610610 610 61061061061061061 0610610610 61 0610 62062 062 0 620620620 620620620620620620620620 620 620620620630630630 630630 630630630630630630 63063063063063063063063063063064064064 0640640640640640640640640640640TSTSTSTSTSTSUB UB UB UB UB UB UBUB U BUB UB UB UB UB UBUB UB U B654.1 651.2 654.6 655.3 655.4 654.3 654.7 655.1 655.0 654.9 654.9 654.9 654.4 654.9 653.5 652.9 652.7 651.2 651.2 652.5 653.6 654.6 655.0 654.5 654.2 655.1 655.3 655.0 654.9 654.9 654.5 653.1 652.8 649.7 654.5 656.4 641.8 655.0 654.5 664.4 661.5 673.3 672.3 656.7 663.6 646.3 638.7 663.0 663.1 663.5 663.6 637.8 636.5 635.1 633.5 612.1 606.7 604.3 606.7 604.8 609.0 622.9 620.7 618.8 616.8 614.9 612.9 611.0 609.1 616.9 617.1 617.1 619.2 621.5 623.0 622.9 618.9 609.0 610.9 612.9 615.1 616.7 618.6 621.0 620.8 619.4 616.5 640.3 639.5 625.5 639.0 642.5 631.1 625.0 657.6 651.7 648.7 648.9 641.1 640670720 710710 650600610 6206206406506 6 0 660670680 70 0 620610 610610610610 610 620620620630630630630630630630630630640640650 640 630 604.1 6306356206 5 0 645650 635 64 0635 6 3 0 620625630625630645 640 6356 3 5 635 630 62563062062563063564 5640635630625620645 6 2 0 615625630635640 640640 630 640 635 635635 64063563563 0 630625625620 620 615 620620615620 625 630 635 640645 645 62 5630635640 62 0625615 620625 61 5615615 62 0625 630 635 635625630635635635 63 5630650645640 63 563062563062562062 5 625625 630615 620 625 630 61 5615.5631.6630.2630.3611.1631.9629.2628.4627.4625.3611.2623.4624.5625.5624.3623.5623.7622.6622.7619.7621.8621.6637.7620.4624.4622.6634.3639.2641.4611.6614.3617.5616.4638.5637.3636.6635.8633.7631.2640.7632.5610.6612.3613.8616.7620.9627.8643.6642.6642.7629.1630.3641.8641.5640.4640.7639.6638.7638.6632.7633.6646.4645.3646.3619.5639.3617.7618.8627.2628.4618.3618.3645.6640.3620.1634.9636.7635.8631.3633.5649.3639.4640.4617.7616.7619.5620.4638.7618.6617.5616.6615.6614.4615.8620.5615.5650.6629.4625.1626.2626.3629.3628.3627.2628.8629.7630.6630.7631.6628.2627.4627.5626.5625.7624.7625.6616.6615.2623.3622.2620.5619.6621.1620.6645.3646.6643.3640.6642.6643.7614.7613.6643.3642.6642.5611.3619.6637.8637.3639.4633.6629.5624.4618.7621.4620.7620.3618.5617.9627.6616.7 618.7 649.0 646.9 645.0 643.1 641.3 639.1 637.1 641.0 645.0 649.1 646.9 644.9 643.0 640.8 638.9 637.0 729.4 607.6 607.2 609.3 635.8 634.8 634.8 612.8 605.1 642.3 632.9 630.9 628.9 626.5 624.9 622.9 624.6 626.7 630.1 634.2 634.3 632.9 630.7 628.8 626.9 624.9 636.9 635.3 634.7 637.2 651.3 651.6 608.7 606.3 606.3 606.5 606.6 607.0 607.1 609.0 609.3 602.6 601.6 612.3 626.3 631.8 606.5 605.0 604.9 605.1 605.2 605.1 604.2 604.4 606.5 606.8 605.9 608.5 608.4 603.8 617.4 615.0 613.9 622.3 615.6 610.8 630.4 634.6 635.1 636.2 632.7 635.4 634.6 634.6 635.1 632.9 630.3 634.6 634.3 633.5 634.9 634.9 634.7 634.7 630.7 610.9 590.6 592.9 615.1 617.6 619.1 633.2 634.9 635.2 612.9 612.8 612.8 614.9 613.1 614.8 627.4 627.5 639.6 610.7 610.9 615.7 600 60 06406206606107207207 10 65064060 0 610610630 640640640650650660 66066 0660 660660660660670 67 0 680680 690 690690700700 6206 2 0 62063 0630 610 610610610610610 610 6206206206206206206206206206206306306 30 630630630630630630630640640640650650650650650650650630BRUSH ASPH ASPHCONCUBASPHUBDENSE TREES DENSE TREE SDENSE TREESBRUSHBRUS H BRUSHBRUSHASPHASPH TIME PLOTTED =>DATE PLOTTED =>1:10:24 PM6/8/201848'12'12'12'12'48'10'8'8' 4 @ 12' GP LANES 10' 4 @ 12' GP LANES 2' 2' BUFFER "B" LINE Exist MEDIAN (21.25') Exist SB I-15 Exist NB I-15 Var 2' MIN BUFFER 93.25'99.50' 18' FG FLATTER 2:1 OR SECTION B-B (26.25') Exist MEDIAN SAWCUT/PG LOL (67') 104'102' (72') 'NO SCALE' R/W ES ETW Shld Exp LANE Exp LANE Shld OG Shld Exp LANE Exp LANE ETW Shld ES MIN R/W OG(2.0%)5.0%(2.0%)2.0%CONFORMElev 641.682235+00.00 PVIElev 640.272236+00.00 PVIElev 638.952237+00.00 PVIElev 637.522238+00.00 PVIElev 636.102239+00.00 PVIElev 634.852240+00.00 PVIElev 633.652241+00.00 PVIElev 630.962243+00.00 PVIElev 629.632244+00.00 PVIElev 626.972246+00.00 PVIElev 625.622247+00.00 PVIElev 624.332248+00.00 PVIElev 622.932249+00.00 PVIElev 621.632250+00.00 PVIElev 620.282251+00.00 PVIElev 618.932252+00.00 PVIElev 617.592253+00.00 PVIElev 614.852255+00.00 PVIElev 612.172257+00.00 PVIElev 609.442259+00.00 PVIElev 608.222260+00.00 PVIElev 606.222262+00.00 PVIElev 605.092264+00.00 PVIElev 604.742265+00.00 PVIElev 604.552267+00.00 PVIElev 604.752268+00.00 PVIElev 605.132269+00.00 PVIElev 605.672270+00.00 PVIElev 607.342272+00.00 PVIElev 608.442273+00.00 PVIElev 609.672274+00.00 PVIElev 610.932275+00.00 PVIElev 615.592279+00.00 PVIElev 616.862280+00.00 PVIElev 618.022281+00.00 PVIElev 620.432283+00.00 PVIElev 621.662284+00.00 PVIElev 622.892285+00.00 PVIElev 624.152286+00.00 PVICONFORM2286+03.08Elev 632.162242+00.00 PVIElev 628.342245+00.00 PVIElev 616.212254+00.00 PVIElev 613.502256+00.00 PVIElev 610.742258+00.00 PVIElev 607.102261+00.00 PVIElev 605.582263+00.00 PVIElev 604.602266+00.00 PVIElev 606.482271+00.00 PVIElev 619.232282+00.00 PVI2275+50.00 PVIElev 611.462233+78.27 2286+03.08R=5000.00 Rt BEGIN Rt ES -5.0% BEGIN Rt ETW -2.0% BEGIN Rt ES -5.0% BEGIN Rt ETW -2.0% Rt ETW -2.0% Rt ES -5.0% +68.30 EC+78.69 BCElev 642.352234+50.00 PVI-1.25%-1.33%-1.45%-1.37%-1.32%-1.32%-1.40%-1.47%-1.61%-1.22%-1.24%-1.25%-1.20%-1.20%-1.38%-1.60% -1.28% -1.30% -1.39% -1.27% -1.27% -1.15% -1.34%-1.39%-1.31%-1.38%-1.29%-1.30%-1.30%-1.50%-1.27%-1.33%-1.41%-1.29%-1.44%-1.27%-1.37%-1.29%-1.40% -1.29% -1.37% -1.44%-1.33%-1.35%-1.40%-1.27%-1.29%-1.56%-1.24%-1.36%-1.21%-1.23%-1.05%-1.18%-0.88%-0.88%-0.61%-0.68%-0.53%-0.45%-0.40%-0.30%-0.19%-0.10%-0.14%0.04%0.14%0.27%0.40%0.36%0.56%0.51%0.76%0.87%0.75%0.96%0.95%1.25%1.29%1.17%1.29%1.24%1.06% 1.25%1.31%1.14%1.18%1.28%1.13%1.17%1.23%1.24%1.21%1.18%1.28%1.17%1.35%2235+50.00 PVIElev 640.962236+50.00 PVIElev 639.612237+50.00 PVIElev 638.252238+50.00 PVIElev 636.712239+50.00 PVIElev 635.482240+50.00 PVIElev 634.252241+50.00 PVIElev 632.972242+50.00 PVIElev 631.592243+50.00 PVIElev 630.322244+50.00 PVIElev 628.982245+50.00 PVIElev 627.662234+00.00 PVIElev 626.312246+50.00 PVIElev 624.982247+50.00 PVIElev 623.682248+50.00 PVIElev 622.292249+50.00 PVIElev 620.932250+50.00 PVIElev 619.562251+50.00 PVIElev 618.242252+50.00 PVIElev 616.892253+50.00 PVIElev 615.572254+50.00 PVIElev 614.182255+50.00 PVIElev 612.802256+50.00 PVIElev 611.522257+50.00 PVIElev 610.122258+50.00 PVIElev 608.832259+50.00 PVIElev 607.692260+50.00 PVIElev 606.662261+50.00 PVIElev 605.922262+50.00 PVIElev 605.312263+50.00 PVIElev 604.892264+50.00 PVIElev 604.642265+50.00 PVIElev 604.532266+50.00 PVIElev 604.622267+50.00 PVIElev 604.952268+50.00 PVIElev 605.412269+50.00 PVIElev 606.052270+50.00 PVIElev 606.862271+50.00 PVIElev 607.812272+50.00 PVIElev 609.082273+50.00 PVIElev 610.312274+50.00 PVIElev 616.212279+50.00 PVIElev 617.432280+50.00 PVIElev 618.662281+50.00 PVIElev 619.812282+50.00 PVIElev 621.052283+50.00 PVIElev 622.252284+50.00 PVIElev 623.472285+50.00 PVIR=5000.00 Rt Rt ETW -2.0% Rt ES -5.0% R=5000.00 Rt Rt ETW -2.0% Rt ES -5.0% Elev 642.98PG/OG SEE NB ON-RAMP ("H2" LINE) PROFILE OG PG/OG -1.35% AXIS OF ROTATION SAWCUT LOL (EXISTING ETW)AXIS OF ROTATION SAWCUT LOL (EXISTING ETW)AXIS OF ROTATION SAWCUT LOL (EXISTING ETW)2233+78.28-1.72%20+00.00Elev 620.2321+35.00 PVI21+41.69 BVCElev 620.141.75%Elev 623.781.11%Elev 616.9923+91.69 PVI1.75% 1.11%Elev 621.3626+41.69 EVCElev 622.0326+79.78 BVCElev 624.8928+79.78 EVCCONFORM-1.26%27+79.78 PVI-1.26%1.75% OG PG OG BEGIN Rt ES -5.0%30+39.13 +70.00+03.36+00.30Rt ES -5.0% Rt ETW -3.0% AXIS OF ROTATION "H1" LINE (Lt ETW) Rt ETW & ES -12.0% Lt ES -12.0% +13.24 EC+20.00 PCC22+70.00 BEGIN Lt ES 3.0% BEGIN Rt ETW -2.0% 20+00.00 BC END Lt ES 0.0% END Rt ETW & ES 0.0% R=649.88' Rt R=4905' Rt +50.0030+39.13V=50 mph V=80 mph SSD=1138' 200' VC R V=50 mph V=70 mph SSD=756' 500' VC RElev 622.541.40%24+46.03CONFORMElev 621.1023+00.48 BVCElev 606.7328+00.48 EVC34+09.88Elev 603.23 25+50.48 PVI -7.15 %1.40% PG OG OG BEGIN Rt ES -5.0% 24+46.03 BEGIN Rt ETW -2.0% BEGIN Lt ES 2.0% 28+15.30 +71.03 BC+21.03 END Lt ES 4.0%+59.88Rt ETW -4.0% Rt ES -5.0% AXIS OF ROTATION "H2" LINE (Lt ETW) 34+09.88 EC R=4905' Rt END Rt ES -5.0% END Rt ETW -2.67%Elev 615.26V=50 mph V=35 mph SSD=286' 500' VC R Lt ES +4.0% 12'12' 4' Shld FG ES ETW ES Shld 12.0% FG FLATTER 2:1 OR 18' MIN FLATTER 2:1 OR "H1" LINE OG 8' PG 146' SECTION C-C 'NO SCALE' R/W 8'12'12' 4' Shld FG 3' 15' FLATTER 4:1 OR FLATTER 2:1 OR 18' 67.5' PG SECTION E-E 'NO SCALE' "H2" LINE MIN HP ES ETW Shld ES MIN R/W OG 4.0%5.0% FG 25 30351 2 346 7 8 9 12 3 425 30 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4125 30 3512346 7891 2 3 4 6 1 25 30 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 2215 2220 2225 2230 2235 2240 2245 2250 2255 2260 2265 2270 2275 2280228522902295230023056 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 6 78 9123467891234678912341 2 3 4 25 6 78 9 3 01 23 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 25 6 7 8 9 30 1 2 3 476 C C C C C FC F C C C F C CC'NO SCALE' 10'8' 5.0% Shld 2 @ 12' Exp LANE ESETW Shld 1' SAWCUT/PG LOL 2.0% OG SECTION D-D OG FG FLATTER 2:1 OR 4 @ 12' GP LANES 48' 105' (83') (2.0%) 24' 2' BUFFER 52.6' Min Exist NB I-15 "B" LINE Aux LANE 12' 36'12'12'12'12'60'10'5' 3 @ 12' GP LANES5 @ 12' GP LANES 2' BUFFER "B" LINE Exist MEDIAN (53.98') Exist SB I-15 Exist NB I-15 SECTION A-A (47.44') Exist MEDIAN 40' 'NO SCALE' R/W ES ETW Shld Exp LANE Exp LANE Shld OG Shld Exp LANE Exp LANE ETW Shld ES R/W OG 153.81'123.71' 9.73'26.98' (69.93') Var BUFFER Var 2' MIN BUFFER GP LANE 105.77' (58.33') INSIDE WIDENING 2' (5.0%)(2.0%)(2.0%)(5.0%) 2.0%2.0% 12' 60'12'12'12'12'48'10' 5 @ 12' GP LANES 10' 4 @ 12' GP LANES "B" LINE Exist MEDIANExist SB I-15 Exist NB I-15 Var 2' MIN BUFFER 18' FG FLATTER 2:1 OR SECTION F-F SAWCUT/PG LOL (70') 'NO SCALE' R/W ES ETW Shld Exp LANE Exp LANE OG Exp LANE Exp LANE ETW Shld ES MIN R/W OG 33.82'105'106.27'74.22' (35') Exist MEDIAN (69.76') 3' Shld 12' 3' Shld (35') 14' BUFFER (5.0%)5.0%(2.0%)(2.0%) 12' Exp LANE 12' Exp LAN ENB I-15 SB I-15 12' Exp LA NESB I-15 NB I-15 NB I-15SB I-15HI DDEN VALLEY P k wy ï»¿N36î€€11 3823.28' ï»¿N11î€€48 2792.49' "B" 2241+78.69 BC "B" 2283+68.30 EC301 C O R O N A Ave 12' LANE 12' GP LANE12' GP LAN E12' GP LAN E12' GP LA NE12' Aux LANE12' Exp LANE 12' GP LANE 12' GP LANE 12' GP LANE 12' GP LANE 10' Shl d10' Shld 5920/5537 (2020) 8' Shld8' Shld12' Exp LANE 12' Exp LANE "H1" 28+13.24 EC 303 305302 Br No. 56-0697 R (WIDEN) CORONA AVE UC "B" LINE 8' Shld 12' LANE 4' Shld 12' LANE 8' Shld 12' LANE 4' Shld "B" LINE "B" LINE "B" LI NE8' Shld "H1" LINE "H2" LINE 5' Shld 12' Exp LANE 10' Shld 12' GP LANE 8' Shld 12' 12' 12' 12' Exp LANE 12' Exp LANE 12' Exp LAN E12' Exp LAN E8' Shl d8' Shld 12' Exp LANE 12' Exp LANE 12' GP LANE 12' GP LANE 12' GP LANE 12' GP LANE 10' Shld 12' Exp LANE 12' Exp LANE 14' BUFFER 8' Shld 8' Shl d12' Exp LAN E 12' Exp LANE 12' Exp LAN E 12' GP LAN E 12' GP LAN E 12' Aux LAN E 10' Sh ld 12' Exp LANE 12' Exp LANE8' S hl d8' Shld 8' Shld 8' Shld 12' Exp LANE 12' GP LANE12' Exp LAN E8' Shl d12'12'12' 12' Beg 37.5:1 TAPER 24.00' Rt "H2" 26+56.93 END 37.5:1 TAPER 12.00' Rt "H2" 31+09.83 END TAPER 105.00' Rt "B" 2243+45.08 Beg CB (TYPE 60D) Beg RW #8 28.58' Rt "H2" 29+00.00 CHP ENFORCEMENT PAD GP "B" LINEEXP 304/676 (2020) 5294/5838 (2020) "B" LINE GP "B" LINE EXP 373/188 (2020) 5706/5936 (2020)"B" LINE GP "B" LINE EXP 376/188 (2020) 5787/5902 (2020) "B" LINEGP "B" LINEEXP 238/580 (2020) 114 5/ 10 53 (2040) 961/86 8 (20 20) 1857/2394 (2040) 6904/7011 (2040) 1614/1277 (2040) 7275/7522 (2040) 1564/2058 (2040) 6806/7347 (2040) 1614/1277 (2040) 7392/7399 (2040)1056/835 (2040)865/602 (2020)665/835 (2040) 665/871 (2020) 928/669 (2040) 927/669 (2020) 811/792 (2040) 515/571 (2020)757 / 852 (2 0 40 )565 / 7 44 (2020 )R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W 12' GP LANE 12' GP LANE 12' GP LANE 12' GP LANE 10' Shld 12' Exp LANE 12' Exp LANE 8' Shld V ar 12' Exp LAN E12' GP LANE12' G P LA NE10' Shl dSECOND StRW #7 LOL RW #8 LOL END CB (TYPE 60D) END RW #7 123.50' Rt "B" 2265+57.76 Beg CB (TYPE 60D) Beg RW #7 125.29' Rt "B" 2262+93.15 "H2" 24+71.03 BC ï»¿N16î€€28 319.72' ï»¿N11î€€37 471.03' R/W R/W "H1" 24+20.00 PCC CB (TYPE 60GC) CONFORM END CB (TYPE 60GC) 304 ï»¿N13î€€21 256.76'"SEL -1 " L INE "S E R-1" LI NE"HVL -2" L IN E "SER -2 " L INE "HVL-1" LINE CONFORM "H1" 30+39.13 PT SAWCUT/PG LOL SAWCUT/PG LOL SAWCUT/PG LOL Beg TAPER ANGLE POINT 22.00' Rt "H2" 34+09.88 END MGS 4.00' Lt "H2" 25+00.00 MGS 1'+95+80+20+97+ 2 7 + 0 0 + 1 9 R/W " S EL- 2" LI NECONFORM "H2" 24+46.03 END CB (TYPE 60D) END RW #8 110.96' Rt "B" 2282+00.00 Beg MGS 4.00' Lt "H2" 00+95.74 30 35 625 5% 0% 10% 600 610 620 630 600 610 620 630 -5% 5% 0% -10% 10% 590 590 -10% -5% 1 2 3 42346789 "H2" LINE SUPERELEVATION DIAGRAM NB ON-RAMP PROFILE 9 1 2 3 4 25 6 7 8 9 30 1 220 -5% 5% 0% -10% 10% 600 610 620 630 640 600 610 620 630 640 -5% 5% 0% -10% 10% "H1" LINE NB OFF-RAMP PROFILE SUPERELEVATION DIAGRAM I-15 NORTHBOUND SAWCUT PROFILE SAWCUT LOL (EXISTING ETW) 12' Exp LANE 12' Exp LANE Var Shld12' Exp LANE 12' Exp LANE NB ROUTE 15 SB ROUTE 15 Var BUFFER CB (TYPE 60) 6' Rt "B" 2216+00.00 "91E-15N" 67+56.59 POT= R/W R/W CONFORM END CB (TYPE 60) 6' Lt "B" 2216+00.00 "15S-91W" 46+95.11 POT= N36°11'36"W 269.99'MATCH LI NE S T A 2 2 1 5 + 0 0 S EE S HE E T 1 4 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 600 610 620 630 640 650 600 610 620 630 640 650 -5% 5% 0% -5% 5% 0% SUPERELEVATION DIAGRAM 2235 2240 2245 2250 2255 2260 2265 1 2 3 4 2275 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 42280 2285 667892270 LEGEND: 1198/618 AM PEAK VOLUME / PM PEAK VOLUME (2020) (2040)YEAR 2040 ULTIMATE PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUME DIRECTION OF TRAVEL GP GENERAL PURPOSE YEAR 2020 INITIAL PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUME Exp EXPRESS V RV DESIGN SPEED ACHIEVED DESIGN SPEED REQUIRED R T LNO. CURVE DATA 5000.00 ï»¿48î€€00'3 226.63 4189.61 302 303 ï»¿4î€€54'2 420.00 3137.26 17°08'46.79" 304 938.86 649.88 ï»¿34î€€40'0 393.24 4905.00 210.13 202.84 472.96 0 100100 SCALE: 1" = 100' 20050 492.125 30°00'00.00" 305 131.86 257.68 301 18.5' CONFORM Beg TAPER 92.93' Rt "B" 2233+78.28 CONFORM END TAPER 105.00' Rt "B" 2286+03.08 82.8'82.8'LOC 4 MS-7 LOC 17 MS-5 LOC 17 MS-6 LOC 25 MS-5 LOC 25 MS-6 LOC 26 MS-5 LOC 26 MS-6 LOC 22 MS-5 LOC 22 MS-6 LOC 5 MS-7 LOC 18 MS-5 LOC 18 MS-6 LOC 19 MS-5 LOC 19 MS-6 LOC 20 MS-5 LOC 20 MS-6 LOC 27 MS-6 LOC 27 MS-5 LOC 21 MS-5 LOC 21 MS-6 LOC 23 MS-6 LOC 23 MS-5 LOC 24 MS-6 LOC 24 MS-5 LOC 2 MS-9 LOC 5 MS-8 LOC 1 AS-6 LOC 1 AS-8 LOC 1 AS-1 LOC 2 AS-3 LOC 7 MS-1 LOC 4 MS-2 LOC 2 AS-2 12' BUFFER2' BUFFER Var 12' GP LANE 12' GP LANE 12' GP LANE 12' Exp LANE 12' Aux LANE 50:1 CONVERGENCE 4°52'08" END CB (TYPE 60C) 23.50' Lt "15S-91W" 46+95.11 END CB (TYPE 60C) 23.50' Rt "91E-15N" 67+56.59 B B CC D D E E FFEND TREATMENT MGS 12B LAYOUT A A LOC 2 AS-7 LOC 2 MS-10 92.07' Rt "B" 2278+66.74 "H1" 34+09.88 EC=95.2'N36°11'36"W 723.62' 95.00' Rt "B" 2249+11.12 "H1" 20+00.00 BC= LOC 4 MS-2 LOC 1 MS-9 2°51'45" EXCEPTIONS TO MANDATORY STANDARDS FEATURE No.HDM INDEX RANGE STANDARD PROVIDED EXCEPTIONS TO ADVISORY STANDARDS FEATURE No.HDM INDEX RANGE STANDARD PROVIDED SHOULDER WIDTH = 5'-8' SHOULDER WIDTH = 3.8'-8' LOC 7 MS-1 201.1(HQ) STA 28+00.48 STA 23+00.48 TO "H2" DESIGN SPEED = 50 MPH SSD = 430' DESIGN SPEED = 35 MPH SSD = 286' LOC 4 MS-2 202.2(1)(HQ)2283+68.30 "B" 2241+78.69 TO SUPERELEVATION = -2.0% R = 5000'SUPERELEVATION = -4.0% LOC 17 MS-5 LOC 17 MS-6 (HQ) 309.1(3)(a) 302.1 SHOULDER WIDTH = 3'SHOULDER WIDTH = 10' LOC 18 MS-5 LOC 18 MS-6 (HQ) 309.1(3)(a) 302.1 SHOULDER WIDTH = 10'SHOULDER WIDTH = 8' LOC 19 MS-5 LOC 19 MS-6 (HQ) 309.1(3)(a) 302.1 SHOULDER WIDTH = 10' LOC 20 MS-5 LOC 20 MS-6 (HQ) 309.1(3)(a) 302.1 SHOULDER WIDTH = 10'SHOULDER WIDTH = 6'-8' LOC 21 MS-5 LOC 21 MS-6 (HQ) 309.1(3)(a) 302.1 SHOULDER WIDTH = 10'SHOULDER WIDTH = 2'-8' LOC 22 MS-5 LOC 22 MS-6 (HQ) 309.1(3)(a) 302.1 SHOULDER WIDTH = 10' LOC 23 MS-6 (HQ) 309.1(3)(a) 302.1 LOC 23 MS-5 SHOULDER WIDTH = 10' LOC 24 MS-5 LOC 24 MS-6 (HQ) 309.1(3)(a) 302.1 SHOULDER WIDTH = 10'SHOULDER WIDTH = 2'-8' LOC 25 MS-5 LOC 25 MS-6 (HQ) 309.1(3)(a) 302.1 SHOULDER WIDTH = 10'SHOULDER WIDTH = 4.6'-8' LOC 26 MS-5 LOC 26 MS-6 (HQ) 309.1(3)(a) 302.1 SHOULDER WIDTH = 10'SHOULDER WIDTH = 6'-8' LOC 27 MS-5 LOC 27 MS-6 (HQ) 309.1(3)(a) 302.1 SHOULDER WIDTH = 10' LOC 5 MS-7 MEDIAN WIDTH = 22'2286+02.66 "B" 2229+48.93 TO MEDIAN WIDTH = 18'-22' LOC 5 MS-8 (HQ) 504.7 501.3 TO SECOND St HIDDEN VALLEY Pkwy INTERCHANGES) (URBAN AREA I/C SPACING = 1 MILE REQUIRED I/C SPACING = 0.8 MILES PROVIDED LOC 2 MS-9 504.7(HQ) OFF-RAMP SECOND St (NB) (NB) ON-RAMP TO HIDDEN VALLEY Pkwy DISTANCE = 2000' REQUIRED WEAVING DISTANCE = 1634' PROVIDED WEAVING LOC 2 MS-10 504.2(2)NB OFF RAMP HIDDEN VALLEY Pkwy LENGTH DECELERATION 270' TANGENT LENGTH NOT PROVIDED TANGENT DECELERATION LOC 1 AS-1 NB OFF-RAMP HIDDEN VALLEY Pkwy DESIGN SPEED = 70 MPH DISTANCE = 1105' DECISION SIGHT DESIGN SPEED = 70 MPH DISTANCE = 627' DECISION SIGHT 504.2(4)(a) 201.7 30+39.13 "H1" 27+00.30 TO202.5 (1) LOC 2 AS-2 TRANSITION LENGTH = 300' SUPERELEVATION REQUIRED = 338.83' TRANSITION LENGTH SUPERELEVATION PROVIDED OF THE LARGER RADIUS SMALLER RADIUS > 2/3 OFF-RAMP "H1" HIDDEN VALLEY Pkwy 203.5 LOC 2 AS-3 R1/R2 = 13.3% RADIUS R2 = 4905.00' RADIUS R1 = 649.88' LOC 1 AS-6 504.2(2)I-15 (NB) ELC MERGE SR-91 (EB)/ LOCATION = 14' REQUIRED INLET NOSE LOCATION = 11.7' PROVIDED INLET NOSE LOC 2 AS-7 504.2(2)NB OFF-RAMP HIDDEN VALLEY PKWY 504.2B ILLUSTRATED IN FIGURE TO STANDARD DESIGNS FREEWAY EXIT CONFORMS DECELERATION LENGTH NO TANGENT CONFORM WITH FIG. 504.2B, FREEWAY EXIT DOES NOT LOC 1 AS-8 504.2(3)NB OFF-RAMP HIDDEN VALLEY Pkwy SIGHT DISTANCE PROVIDED NONSTANDARD DECISION ADVANCE OF EXIT IF REQUIRED AUX LANE IN IN ADVANCE OF EXIT AUX LANE NOT PROVIDED LOC 1 MS-9 504.7(HQ)DISTANCE = 5000' REQUIRED WEAVING DISTANCE = 3209' PROVIDED WEAVING Pkwy (NB) OFF RAMP TO HIDDEN VALLEY SR-91/I-15 (NB) SHOULDER WIDTH = 6'-8' SHOULDER WIDTH = 6'-8' I-15 (NB) TO 2221+65.00 "B" 2220+35.00 I-15 (NB) TO 2286+00.00 "B" 2224+49.95 I-15 (NB/SB) TO 2234+60.93 "B" 2232+19.93 I-15 (NB/SB) TO 2248+89.73 "B" 2247+64.00 I-15 (NB/SB) TO 2273+77.16 "B" 2268+97.16 I-15 (SB) TO 2296+40.00 "B" 2284+40.00 I-15 (SB) TO 2302+80.42 "B" 2268+97.16 I-15 (SB) TO 2248+26.76 "B" 2232+30.90 I-15 (NB) TO 2285+60.00 "B" 2272+37.34 I-15 (NB) TO 2269+63.33 "B" 2268+37.34 I-15 (NB) TO 2265+20.00 "B" 2260+40.00 (HQ) 309.1(3)(a) 305.1(3)(a) LOC 4 MS-7 MEDIAN WIDTH = 22'2219+60.30 "B" 2210+38.00 TO MEDIAN WIDTH = 12'-22' (HQ) 309.1(3)(a) 305.1(3)(a) CCO-10 EXHIBIT A I-15 / SR-91 EXPRESS LANE CONNECTOR PROJECTHIDDEN VALLEY PARKWAY WIDENINGSEPTEMBER 2018 I-15 / SR-91 EXPRESS LANE CONNECTOR PROJECTHIDDEN VALLEY PARKWAY WIDENINGSEPTEMBER 2018 CCO-10 EXHIBIT A I-15 / SR 91 GEOMETRIC CONCEPT 48 BLANK CCO-10 Exhibit B Supplemental Technical Provisions Page 1 of 2 This technical provision augments the Technical Provisions for the Contract to provide structural section recommendations for the outside widening of Interstate 15. 11.3 Augmented Pavement Structural Section Design Requirements This technical provision augments the Technical Provisions for the Contract to provide structural section recommendations for the outside widening of Interstate 15. 11.3.1 General The designs shown in Tables 11-1 are based on Type II subgrade for rigid pavement and R-value of 20 for flexible pavement. For flexible pavement, 40-year HMA thickness should be adjusted to reflect the actual subgrade values based on subsurface investigation. The selected subgrade R-value shall be used for the entire width of the newly constructed pavement section, including travel lanes, buffer, and shoulder. 11.3.2 Permanent Pavement Structural Sections Construct the permanent pavement sections as shown in Table 11-1. 49 CCO-10 Exhibit B Supplemental Technical Provisions Page 2 of 2 TABLE 11-1 PERMANENT PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTIONS Location TI *Pavement Thickness (feet) Outside Mainline/Auxiliary Lane and Shoulder Widening I-15 17 1.30 JPCP BB 0.35 LCB 0.70 AS Ramp Reconstruction I-15 NB Off- Ramp Hidden Valley 11 0.20 RHMA-G 1.15 HMA-A 0.50 AB I-15 NB On- Ramp Hidden Valley 11 0.20 RHMA-G 1.15 HMA-A 0.50 AB Abbreviations JPCP = Jointed plain concrete pavement BB= Bond Breaker LCB= Lean concrete base AS = Class 2 aggregate subbase RHMA-G= Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt (Gap Graded) HMA-Hot Mix Asphalt AB-Aggregate Base *This design is based on Type II subgrade. Type III subgrade shall be removed and replaced with Type I or Type II subgrade or treated in accordance with the HDM and Standard Specifications. BB = Bond Breaker should follow Section 36-2 of 2015 Caltrans Standard Specifications. Follow the guidelines provided in 2017 HDM Index 633.1(3) Inside Lane Widening · Use isolation joint per the Department Standard Plan P-18 between new pavement and existing pavement. Outside Lane Widening · Use isolation joint per the Department Revised Standard Plan P-18 between new and existing pavement. · Use silicone joint sealer meeting the Department Standard Specification requirements to seal the transverse and weakened plane joints for the outside travel lanes. 50 Project Name:I-15 Express Lanes Project Number:16-31-057-00 Crow Job Number:098-020 9/12/2018 Owner / Agency:RCTC Unit Price Units Total Design Aztec 291,183.07$ 1 291,183.07$ Construction Hidden Valley CCO10 Work 13,544,739.55$ 1 13,544,739.55$ Hidden Valley TMS 987,090.10$ 1 987,090.10$ Median Drainage NDC 183,018.18$ 1 183,018.18$ Schedule Acceleration 228,772.73$ 1 228,772.73$ Total 15,234,803.63$ Skanska-Ames 1801 California Ave Corona, CA 92881 CCO #10 Cost Breakdown Performed by ______________ Date ______________ ATTACHMENT 3 51 BLANK AGENDA ITEM 8C BLANK Agenda Item 8C RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: October 10, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Alex Menor, Capital Projects Manager Marlin Feenstra, Project Delivery Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Agreement for Construction Management Services, Materials Testing, and Construction Surveying for the Mid County Parkway – Sweeney Mitigation Site Project in Riverside County WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Award Agreement No. 18-31-166-00 to DHS Consulting, Inc. to perform construction management services, materials testing, and construction surveying for the Mid County Parkway – Sweeney Mitigation Site Project (Project) in the amount of $907,717, plus a contingency amount of $90,772, for potential changes in scope, for a total amount not to exceed $998,489; 2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required for the Project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Mid County Parkway (MCP) project has been under development by the Commission since 2002. The purpose of the MCP project is to provide an east-west regional transportation facility that would effectively and efficiently accommodate the movement of people, goods, and services between and through the cities of Perris and San Jacinto. On April 15, 2015, the Commission, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and Caltrans approved the final environmental impact report (EIR)/final environmental impact statement and the final environmental document (ED) under the National Environmental Policy Act/California Environmental Quality Act. The Project Approval/ED phase for the MCP project was completed with FHWA’s approval of the Record of Decision on August 17, 2015. In December 2015, the Commission purchased 154.3 acres of land (referred to as the Sweeney parcel), of which 130 acres satisfied 93 percent of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species 52 Agenda Item 8C Habitat Conservation Plan habitat requirements for the entire MCP project. This project would create 10.26 acres of wetlands resources by grading a portion of Sweeney parcel to enhance and expand the 10-year floodplain of the San Jacinto River, and provide planting with certain types of vegetation to meet the required mitigation acreage requirement. On July 11, 2018, the Commission approved an addendum to the previously certified EIR for the MCP project. The addendum approved the proposed changes to the MCP associated with the addition of the Sweeney mitigation site and a contract with Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. to prepare plans, specifications, and estimate of construction contract documents and support services for the Sweeney mitigation site. Staff also informed the Commission it would return in the future to obtain approvals for construction management and construction contracts. See Attachment 1 for project vicinity map. DISCUSSION: Procurement Process Pursuant to Government Code 4525 et seq, selection of architect, engineer, and related services shall be on the basis of demonstrated competence and on professional qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required. Therefore, staff used the qualification method of selection for the procurement of construction management services, materials testing, and construction surveying for the Project. Evaluation criteria included elements such as qualifications of firm and key personnel, staffing and project organization, project understanding and approach, and the ability to respond to the requirements set forth under the terms of a request for qualifications (RFQ). RFQ No. 18-31-166-00 for construction management services, materials testing, and construction surveying for the Project was released by staff on July 5, 2018. A public notice was advertised in the Press Enterprise, and the RFQ was posted on the Commission’s Planet Bids website, which is accessible through the Commission’s website. Through Planet Bids, 71 firms downloaded the RFQ; 13 of these firms are located in Riverside County. A pre-submittal meeting was held on July 17 and attended by 5 firms. Staff responded to all questions submitted by potential proposers prior to the July 24 clarification deadline. One firm – DHS Consulting, Inc. – submitted a responsive and responsible statement of qualifications prior to the 2:00 p.m. submittal deadline on August 7. Since staff received one statement of qualifications, it reviewed the solicitation specifications for undue restrictiveness and surveyed potential firms that chose not to submit a proposal. A primary reason for not submitting a proposal included the firms’ commitment of their resources to other Commission projects. Staff concluded that the requirements listed in the scope of work and other terms and conditions were not unnecessarily or excessively restrictive, an adequate opportunity to compete was provided, and factors other than the solicitation were responsible for the receipt of one statement of qualifications for these services. 53 Agenda Item 8C Based on the evaluation criteria set forth in the RFQ, the firm was evaluated and scored by an evaluation committee comprised of Commission and Bechtel staff. As a result of the evaluation committee’s assessment of the written statement of qualifications and pursuant to the terms of the RFQ, the evaluation committee invited DHS Consulting, Inc. to the interview phase of the evaluation and selection process. The interview was conducted on August 29. Following the interview, the evaluation committee scored the interview and combined the firm’s written and interview scores. Accordingly, the evaluation committee recommends contract award to DHS Consulting, Inc. to provide construction management services, materials testing, and construction surveying for the Project. Subsequently, staff negotiated the scope of work (including the appropriate level of effort, labor categories/mix, etc.), cost, and schedule proposal received from DHS Consulting, Inc. for the Project services and established a fair and reasonable price of $907,717. Staff recommends award of an agreement with DHS Consulting, Inc. for construction management services, materials testing, and construction surveying related to the Project in the amount of $907,717, plus a contingency amount of $90,772, for a total amount not to exceed $998,489. Staff also recommends authorizing the Executive Director to approve the use of the contingency amount as may be required for the Project. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20+ Amount: $250,000 $748,489 Source of Funds: Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee- Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process funds, 2009 Measure A Western County New Corridors funds Budget Adjustment: No GLA No.: 002320 81302 00000 0000 261 31 81302 ($998,489) Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 09/14/2018 Attachments: 1) Project Vicinity Map 2) Draft Agreement No. 18-31-166-00 with DHS Consulting, Inc. 54 BLANK ATTACHMENT 1 55 BLANK 17336.00000\8752982.5 Agreement No. 18-31-166-00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, MATERIALS TESTING, AND CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MID COUNTY PARKWAY – SWEENEY MITIGATION SITE PROJECT WITH DHS CONSULTING, INC. 1.PARTIES AND DATE. This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 2018, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ("the Co- mmission") and DHS Consulting, Inc. ("Consultant"), a CORPORATION. 2.RECITALS. 2.1 Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain professional consulting services required by Commission on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is a professional consultant, experienced in providing construction management services, materials testing, and construction surveying to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of Commission. 2.2 Commission desires to engage Consultant to render certain consulting services for the Mid County Parkway – Sweeney Mitigation Site Project ("Project") as set forth herein. 3.TERMS. 3.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to Commission all labor materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately provide professional consulting services and advice on various issues affecting the decisions of Commission regarding the Project and on other programs and matters affecting Commission, hereinafter referred to as "Services". The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in ATTACHMENT 2 56 17336.00000\8752982.5 accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations. 3.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date first specified above to December 31, 2021, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. 3.3 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, the Commission shall respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of the Commission, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services. 3.4 Independent Contractor; Control and Payment of Subordinates. The Services shall be performed by Consultant under its supervision. Consultant will determine the means, method and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. Commission retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and Consultant is not an employee of Commission. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall not be employees of Commission and shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. 3.5 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of Commission. 3.6 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to Commission that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence and experience upon written approval of Commission. In the event that Commission and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, Commission shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause, pursuant to provisions of Section 3.16 of this Agreement. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: __________________________________. 3.7 Commission’s Representative. Commission hereby designates the Executive Director, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance 57 17336.00000\8752982.5 of this Agreement ("Commission’s Representative"). Commission's representative shall have the power to act on behalf of Commission for all purposes under this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction from any person other than Commission's Representative or his or her designee. 3.8 Consultant’s Representative. Consultant hereby designates Melanie Estes, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement ("Consultant’s Representative"). Consultant’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his or her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement. 3.9 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with Commission staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to Commission's staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times. 3.10 Standard of Care; Licenses. Consultant shall perform the Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standard generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from Commission, any Services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein, and shall be fully responsible to the Commission for all damages and other liabilities provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement arising from the Consultant’s errors and omissions. 3.11 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations and without giving written notice to Commission, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold Commission, its officials, directors, officers, employees and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations. 58 17336.00000\8752982.5 3.12 Insurance. 3.12.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that it has secured all insurance required under this section, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the Commission. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. 3.12.2 Minimum Requirements. Consultant shall, at its expense, procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Agreement by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Consultant shall also require all of its subcontractors to procure and maintain the same insurance for the duration of the Agreement. Such insurance shall meet at least the following minimum levels of coverage: (A) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the latest version of the following: (1) General Liability: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001 or exact equivalent); (2) Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage (form CA 0001, code 1 (any auto) or exact equivalent); and (3) Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability: Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance. (B) Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit; (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and (3) if Consultant has an employees, Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability: Workers’ Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California. Employer’s Practices Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident. 3.12.3 Professional Liability. Consultant shall procure and maintain, and require its sub-consultants to procure and maintain, for a period of five (5) years following completion of the Project, errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to their profession. Such insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per claim. This insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement and shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant. “Covered Professional Services” as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. 59 17336.00000\8752982.5 3.12.4 Insurance Endorsements. The insurance policies shall contain the following provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the Commission to add the following provisions to the insurance policies: (A) General Liability. (i) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for (1) bodily Injury and property damage; (2) personal Injury/advertising Injury; (3) premises/operations liability; (4) products/completed operations liability; (5) aggregate limits that apply per Project; (6) explosion, collapse and underground (UCX) exclusion deleted; (7) contractual liability with respect to this Agreement; (8) broad form property damage; and (9) independent consultants coverage. (ii) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) contractual liability; (2) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to this Agreement. (iii) The policy shall give the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, and agents insured status using ISO endorsement forms 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (iv) The additional insured coverage under the policy shall be “primary and non-contributory” and will not seek contribution from the Commission’s insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 01 04 13, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (B) Automobile Liability. The automobile liability policy shall be endorsed to state that: (1) the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant or for which the Consultant is responsible; and (2) the insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents, or if excess, shall stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Consultant’s scheduled underlying coverage. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not be called upon to contribute with it in any way. 60 17336.00000\8752982.5 (C) Workers’ Compensation and Employers Liability Coverage. (i) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement. (ii) The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents for losses paid under the terms of the insurance policy which arise from work performed by the Consultant. (D) All Coverages. (i) Defense costs shall be payable in addition to the limits set forth hereunder. (ii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits set forth herein shall be available to the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds under said policies. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured; whichever is greater. (iii) The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the Commission (if agreed to in a written contract or agreement) before the Commission’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. The umbrella/excess policy shall be provided on a “following form” basis with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying policy(ies). (iv) Consultant shall provide the Commission at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement, except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the Commission at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration. 61 17336.00000\8752982.5 (v) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by another claims-made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement. (vi) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the Commission, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification. (vii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, Commission has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by Commission will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or Commission will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, Commission may cancel this Agreement. The Commission may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (viii) Neither the Commission nor any of its directors, officials, officers, employees or agents shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement. Each insurance policy required by this Agreement shall be endorsed to state that: 3.12.5 Deductibles and Self-Insurance Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Commission. If the Commission does not approve the deductibles or self-insured retentions as presented, Consultant shall guarantee that, at the option of the Commission, either: (1) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees and agents; or, (2) the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation costs, claims and administrative and defense expenses. 3.12.6 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating no less than A:VIII, licensed to do business in California, and satisfactory to the Commission. 3.12.7 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish Commission with original certificates of insurance and endorsements effecting coverage required by this 62 17336.00000\8752982.5 Agreement on forms satisfactory to the Commission. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the Commission before work commences. The Commission reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time. 3.12.8 Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the Commission that they have secured all insurance required under this section. Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the Commission as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, the Commission may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants. 3.13 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 3.14 Fees and Payment. 3.14.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto. The total compensation shall not exceed [___INSERT WRITTEN DOLLAR AMOUNT___] ($[___INSERT NUMERICAL DOLLAR AMOUNT___]) without written approval of Commission's Executive Director (“Total Compensation”). Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement. 3.14.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to Commission a monthly statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. Commission shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon. 63 17336.00000\8752982.5 3.14.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by Commission. 3.14.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, Commission may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which is determined by Commission to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from Commission's Executive Director. 3.15 Accounting Records. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred and fees charged under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of Commission during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. 3.16 Termination of Agreement. 3.16.1 Grounds for Termination. Commission may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been fully and adequately rendered to Commission through the effective date of the termination, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 3.16.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, Commission may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data, as defined below, and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request. 3.16.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, Commission may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated. 3.17 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose: 64 17336.00000\8752982.5 CONSULTANT: COMMISSION: ______________________ Riverside County ______________________ Transportation Commission ______________________ 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor _____________________ Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: ________________ Attn: Executive Director Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. 3.18 Ownership of Materials/Confidentiality. 3.18.1 Documents & Data. This Agreement creates an exclusive and perpetual license for Commission to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sub-license any and all copyrights and designs embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that Commission is granted an exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the Commission. Commission shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents & Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at Commission’s sole risk. 3.18.2 Intellectual Property. In addition, Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest (including copyright, patent, trade secret and other proprietary rights) in all plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, materials, data, computer programs or software and source code, enhancements, documents, and any and all works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium or expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or other data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer media (“Intellectual Property”) prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement as well as any other such Intellectual Property prepared or developed by or on behalf of Consultant under this Agreement. 65 17336.00000\8752982.5 The Commission shall have and retain all right, title and interest in Intellectual Property developed or modified under this Agreement whether or not paid for wholly or in part by Commission, whether or not developed in conjunction with Consultant, and whether or not developed by Consultant. Consultant will execute separate written assignments of any and all rights to the above referenced Intellectual Property upon request of Commission. Consultant shall also be responsible to obtain in writing separate written assignments from any subcontractors or agents of Consultant of any and all right to the above referenced Intellectual Property. Should Consultant, either during or following termination of this Agreement, desire to use any of the above-referenced Intellectual Property, it shall first obtain the written approval of the Commission. All materials and documents which were developed or prepared by the Consultant for general use prior to the execution of this Agreement and which are not the copyright of any other party or publicly available and any other computer applications, shall continue to be the property of the Consultant. However, unless otherwise identified and stated prior to execution of this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants that it has the right to grant the exclusive and perpetual license for all such Intellectual Property as provided herein. Commission further is granted by Consultant a non-exclusive and perpetual license to copy, use, modify or sub-license any and all Intellectual Property otherwise owned by Consultant which is the basis or foundation for any derivative, collective, insurrectional, or supplemental work created under this Agreement. 3.18.3 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of Commission, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use Commission's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of Commission. 3.18.4 Infringement Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, for any alleged infringement of any patent, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, or any other proprietary right of any person or entity in consequence of the use 66 17336.00000\8752982.5 on the Project by Commission of the Documents & Data, including any method, process, product, or concept specified or depicted. 3.19 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement. 3.20 Attorney's Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney's fees and costs of such actions. 3.21 Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of Commission’s choosing), indemnify and hold Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to alleged negligent acts, omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants, and contractors arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of consequential damages, expert witness fees, and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant shall defend, at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against Commission, its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents, or volunteers. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against Commission or its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents, or volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse Commission and its directors, officials, officers, employees, consultants, agents, and/or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees, incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Commission, its directors, officials officers, employees, consultants, agents, or volunteers. If Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant’s performance as a “design professional” (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Consultant’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault. Consultant’s obligations as set forth in this Section shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. 67 17336.00000\8752982.5 3.22 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be supplemented, amended, or modified by a writing signed by both parties. 3.23 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. 3.24 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement. 3.25 Commission's Right to Employ Other Consultants. The Commission reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project. 3.26 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties, and shall not be assigned by Consultant without the prior written consent of Commission. 3.27 Prohibited Interests and Conflicts. 3.27.1 Solicitation. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, Commission shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. 3.27.2 Conflict of Interest. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of Commission, during the term of his or her service with Commission, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom. 3.27.3 Conflict of Employment. Employment by the Consultant of personnel currently on the payroll of the Commission shall not be permitted in the performance of this Agreement, even though such employment may occur outside of the employee’s regular working hours or on weekends, holidays or vacation time. Further, the employment by the Consultant of personnel who have been on the Commission payroll within one year prior to the date of execution of this Agreement, where this employment is caused by and or dependent upon the Consultant securing this or related Agreements with the Commission, is prohibited. 3.27.4 Employment Adverse to the Commission. Consultant shall notify the Commission, and shall obtain the Commission’s written consent, prior to 68 17336.00000\8752982.5 accepting work to assist with or participate in a third-party lawsuit or other legal or administrative proceeding against the Commission during the term of this Agreement. 3.28 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of Commission's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related Commission programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted. 3.29 Subcontracting. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work or Services required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of the Commission. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. 3.30 Prevailing Wages. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certified that it is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000 et seq. (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The Commission shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rate of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the project site. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 3.30.1 DIR Registration. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. If applicable, Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the Project and require the same of any subconsultants. This Project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. 3.31 Employment of Apprentices. This Agreement shall not prevent the employment of properly indentured apprentices in accordance with the California Labor Code, and no employer or labor union shall refuse to accept otherwise qualified employees 69 17336.00000\8752982.5 as indentured apprentices on the work performed hereunder solely on the ground of race, creed, national origin, ancestry, color or sex. Every qualified apprentice shall be paid the standard wage paid to apprentices under the regulations of the craft or trade in which he or she is employed and shall be employed only in the craft or trade to which he or she is registered. If California Labor Code Section 1777.5 applies to the Services, Consultant and any subcontractor hereunder who employs workers in any apprenticeable craft or trade shall apply to the joint apprenticeship council administering applicable standards for a certificate approving Consultant or any sub-consultant for the employment and training of apprentices. Upon issuance of this certificate, Consultant and any sub-consultant shall employ the number of apprentices provided for therein, as well as contribute to the fund to administer the apprenticeship program in each craft or trade in the area of the work hereunder. The parties expressly understand that the responsibility for compliance with provisions of this Section and with Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 of the California Labor Code in regard to all apprenticeable occupations lies with Consultant. 3.32 No Waiver. Failure of Commission to insist on any one occasion upon strict compliance with any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof shall not be deemed a waiver of such term, covenant or condition, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of any rights or powers hereunder at any one time or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment of such other right or power at any other time or times. 3.33 Eight-Hour Law. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Labor Code, eight hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work, and the time of service of any worker employed on the work shall be limited and restricted to eight hours during any one calendar day, and forty hours in any one calendar week, except when payment for overtime is made at not less than one and one-half the basic rate for all hours worked in excess of eight hours per day ("Eight-Hour Law"), unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight-Hour Law. Consultant shall forfeit to Commission as a penalty, $50.00 for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by him, or by any sub- consultant under him, for each calendar day during which such workman is required or permitted to work more than eight hours in any calendar day and forty hours in any one calendar week without such compensation for overtime violation of the provisions of the California Labor Code, unless Consultant or the Services are not subject to the Eight-Hour Law. 3.34 Subpoenas or Court Orders. Should Consultant receive a subpoena or court order related to this Agreement, the Services or the Project, Consultant shall immediately provide written notice of the subpoena or court order to the Commission. Consultant shall not respond to any such subpoena or court order until notice to the Commission is provided as required herein, and shall cooperate with the Commission in responding to the subpoena or court order. 70 17336.00000\8752982.5 3.35 Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the indemnification and confidentiality obligations, and the obligations related to receipt of subpoenas or court orders, shall survive any such expiration or termination. 3.36 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties. 3.37 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 3.38 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original. 3.39 Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 3.40 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. 3.41 Conflicting Provisions. In the event that provisions of any attached exhibits conflict in any way with the provisions set forth in this Agreement, the language, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement shall control the actions and obligations of the Parties and the interpretation of the Parties’ understanding concerning the performance of the Services. 3.42 Headings. Article and Section Headings, paragraph captions or marginal headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall have no effect in the construction or interpretation of any provision herein. 3.43 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein, without the prior written consent of the Commission. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. 3.44 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party. 71 17336.00000\8752982.5 SIGNATURE PAGE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, MATERIALS TESTING, AND CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MID COUNTY PARKWAY – SWEENEY MITIGATION SITE PROJECT WITH DHS CONSULTING, INC. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement was executed on the date first written above. RIVERSIDE COUNTY CONSULTANT TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DHS CONSULTING, INC. By: __________________________ By: ____________________________ [INSERT NAME] Signature Chairman ___________________________ Name [NOT NEEDED IF APPROVED BY COMMISSION] ____________________________ Title By: ____________________________ Anne Mayer Executive Director Approved as to Form: Attest: By: ____________________________ By: ________________________ Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel Its: ________________________ * A corporation requires the signatures of two corporate officers. One signature shall be that of the chairman of board, the president or any vice president and the second signature (on the attest line) shall be that of the secretary, any assistant secretary, the chief financial officer or any assistant treasurer of such corporation. If the above persons are not the intended signators, evidence of signature authority shall be provided to RCTC. 72 17336.00000\8752982.5 73 17336.00000\8752982.5 A-1 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES [___INSERT___] 74 17336.00000\8752982.5 B-1 EXHIBIT "B" SCHEDULE OF SERVICES [___INSERT___] 75 17336.00000\8752982.5 C-1 EXHIBIT "C" COMPENSATION [___INSERT___] 76 BLANK AGENDA ITEM 8D BLANK Agenda Item 8D RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: October 10, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Alex Menor, Capital Projects Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: California Department of Fish and Wildlife 1600 Streambed Alteration Master Agreement for the Mid County Parkway Project WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Authorize staff to procure a 1600 Streambed Alteration Master Agreement (Master Agreement) from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) for the entire Mid County Parkway (MCP) project for a term of 21 years through 2040; 2) Approve the expenditure for a permit related to the procurement of the Master Agreement in the amount of $86,826 and for an annual Master Agreement administrative maintenance fee of approximately $725 for a total amount of $15,215, plus a contingency amount of $7,500 for a total amount not to exceed $109,541; 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and 4) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve non-funding agreements or amendments that might be required for these services. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The MCP project has been under development by the Commission since 2002. The purpose of the MCP project is to provide an east-west regional transportation facility that would effectively and efficiently accommodate the movement of people, goods, and services between and through the cities of Perris and San Jacinto. On April 15, 2015, the Commission, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and Caltrans approved the environmental impact statement and the environmental document (ED) under the National Environmental Protection Act/California Environmental Quality Act. The Project Approval/ED phase for the MCP project was completed with FHWA’s approval of the Record of Decision on August 17, 2015. 77 Agenda Item 8D In December 2015, the Commission purchased 154.3 acres of land (referred as the Sweeney parcel) of which 130 acres satisfied 93 percent of the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) habitat requirements for the entire MCP project. The Commission is also creating 10.26 acres of wetlands resources by grading a portion of Sweeney parcel to enhance and expand the 10-year floodplain of the San Jacinto River and planting with the required types of vegetation to meet the required mitigation acres. The Sweeney parcel will also provide all the mitigation required for the MCP’s 1600 Streambed Alteration permit (1600 Permit) estimated at 15.88 acres of permanent impact to waters of the state of California. On July 11, 2018, the Commission approved an addendum to the previously certified environmental impact report for the MCP project. The addendum approved the proposed changes to the MCP associated with the addition of the Sweeney mitigation site to mitigate for US Army Corp of Engineers and MSHCP mitigation requirements. DISCUSSION: CDFW requires a 1600 Permit for each construction package, unless a master agreement is in place. The process for obtaining the permit for each construction package would be time consuming and costly because it would reopen negotiations with CDFW over impacts and mitigation requirements based on conditions at the time and require acquisition of individual mitigation sites for each package. However, a master agreement allows banking of mitigation lands and locks in the mitigation requirements over the life of the agreement. Since the Commission has acquired the Sweeney mitigation site to satisfy other environmental mitigation requirements and the site is sufficient in size to also provide all the needed mitigation for impacts to waters of the State for the entire MCP project, staff recommends that the Commission enter into a master agreement for a term of 21 years through 2040. The cost for the master agreement is $86,826 plus an annual fee of $724.50 for the years when no 1600 Permit application is processed. The CDFW 1600 Permit fee for a future MCP construction package is $7,234.75, which would be a project cost for each MCP construction package. The annual maintenance and 1600 Permit fees are adjusted annually according to the CDFW 1600 Fee Schedule. Staff recommends the Commission procure and enter into a master agreement with CDFW for the entire MCP project in the amount of $86,826 and for an annual administrative maintenance fee of approximately $725 through 2040 (21 years) and total amount of $15,215, plus a contingency amount of $7,500, for a total amount not to exceed $109,541. 78 Agenda Item 8D Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes N/A Year: FY 2018/19 FY 2019/20+ Amount: $86,826 $22,715 Source of Funds: TUMF CETAP, 2009 Measure A Western County New Corridors Budget Adjustment: No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 002302 81020 00000 0000 210 73 81002 612302 81020 00000 0000 261 31 81002 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 09/17/2018 Attachment: CDFW 1600 Notification of Lake or Streambed Alteration Form 79 BLANK State of California – Department of Fish and Wildlife NOTIFICATION OF LAKE OR STREAMBED ALTERATION FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 1602 DFW 2023 (REV. 05/01/18) Page 1 FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Date Received Amount Received Amount Due Date Complete Notification No. $ $ Assigned to: NOTIFICATION OF LAKE OR STREAMBED ALTERATION Complete EACH field, unless otherwise indicated, following the enclosed instructions and submit ALL required enclosures. Attach additional pages, if necessary. 1. APPLICANT PROPOSING PROJECT Name Business/Agency Mailing Address City, State, Zip Telephone Fax Email 2. CONTACT PERSON (Complete only if different from applicant) Name Street Address City, State, Zip Telephone Fax Email 3. PROPERTY OWNER (Complete only if different from applicant) Name Street Address City, State, Zip Telephone Fax Email 4. PROJECT NAME AND AGREEMENT TERM A. Project Name B. Agreement Term Requested □Regular (5 years or less) □Long-term (greater than 5 years) C. Project Term D. Seasonal Work Period E. Number of Work Days Beginning (year) Ending (year) Start Date (month/day) End Date (month/day) 80 State of California – Department of Fish and Wildlife NOTIFICATION OF LAKE OR STREAMBED ALTERATION FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 1602 DFW 2023 (REV. 05/01/18) Page 2 5. AGREEMENT TYPE Check the applicable box. If box B, C, D, E, or F is checked, complete the specified attachment. A. □ Standard (Most construction projects, excluding the categories listed below) B. □ Gravel/Sand/Rock Extraction (Attachment A) Mine I.D. Number:______________________________ C. □ Timber Harvesting (Attachment B) THP Number: ________________________________ D. □ Water Diversion/Extraction/Impoundment (Attachment C) SWRCB Number: _____________________________ E. □ Routine Maintenance (Attachment D) F. □ Cannabis Cultivation (Attachment E) G. □ Department Grant Programs Agreement Number: ______________________________________ H. □ Master I. □ Master Timber Operations 6. FEES See the current fee schedule to determine the appropriate notification fee. Itemize each project’s estimated cost and corresponding fee. Note: The Department may not process this notification until the correct fee has been received. A. Project B. Project Cost C. Project Fee 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 D. Base Fee (if applicable) E. TOTAL FEE* * Check, money orders, or any debit/credit card with the Visa or Mastercard logo are accepted. 81 State of California – Department of Fish and Wildlife NOTIFICATION OF LAKE OR STREAMBED ALTERATION FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 1602 DFW 2023 (REV. 05/01/18) Page 3 7. PRIOR NOTIFICATION AND ORDERS A. Has a notification previously been submitted to, or a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement previously been issued by, the Department for the project described in this notification? □ Yes (Provide the information below) □ No Applicant Notification Number Date B. Is this notification being submitted in response to a court or administrative order or notice, or a notice of violation (NOV) issued by the Department? □ No □ Yes (Enclose a copy of the order, notice, or NOV. If the applicant was directed to notify the Department verbally rather than in writing, identify the person who directed the applicant to submit this notification and the agency he or she represents, and describe the circumstances relating to the order.) □ Continued on additional page(s) 8. PROJECT LOCATION A. Address or description of project location. (Include a map that marks the location of the project with a reference to the nearest city or town, and provide driving directions from a major road or highway) □ Continued on additional page(s) B. River, stream, or lake affected by the project. C. What water body is the river, stream, or lake tributary to? D. Is the river or stream segment affected by the project listed in the state or federal Wild and Scenic Rivers Acts? □ Yes □ No □ Unknown E. County F. USGS 7.5 Minute Quad Map Name G. Township H. Range I. Section J. ¼ Section □ Continued on additional page(s) K. Meridian (check one) □ Humboldt □ Mt. Diablo □ San Bernardino L. Assessor’s Parcel Number(s) □ Continued on additional page(s) 82 State of California – Department of Fish and Wildlife NOTIFICATION OF LAKE OR STREAMBED ALTERATION FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 1602 DFW 2023 (REV. 05/01/18) Page 4 M. Coordinates (If available, provide at least latitude/longitude or UTM coordinates and check appropriate boxes) Latitude/Longitude Latitude: Longitude: □ Degrees/Minutes/Seconds □ Decimal Degrees □ Decimal Minutes UTM Easting: Northing: □ Zone 10 □ Zone 11 Datum used for Latitude/Longitude or UTM □ NAD 27 □ NAD 83 or WGS 84 9. PROJECT CATEGORY WORK TYPE NEW CONSTRUCTION REPLACE EXISTING STRUCTURE REPAIR-MAINTAIN-OPERATE EXISTING STRUCTURE Bank stabilization – bioengineering/recontouring □ □ □ Bank stabilization – rip-rap/retaining wall/gabion □ □ □ Boat dock/pier □ □ □ Boat ramp □ □ □ Bridge □ □ □ Channel clearing/vegetation management □ □ □ Culvert □ □ □ Debris basin □ □ □ Dam □ □ □ Filling of wetland, river, stream, or lake □ □ □ Geotechnical survey □ □ □ Habitat enhancement – revegetation/mitigation □ □ □ Levee □ □ □ Low water crossing □ □ □ Road/trail □ □ □ Sediment removal: pond, stream, or marina □ □ □ flood control □ □ □ Storm drain outfall structure □ □ □ Temporary stream crossing □ □ □ Utility crossing: horizontal directional drilling □ □ □ jack/bore □ □ □ open trench □ □ □ Water diversion without facility □ □ □ Water diversion with facility □ □ □ Other (specify): □ □ □ 83 State of California – Department of Fish and Wildlife NOTIFICATION OF LAKE OR STREAMBED ALTERATION FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 1602 DFW 2023 (REV. 05/01/18) Page 5 10. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Describe the project in detail. Include photographs of the project location and immediate surrounding area. - Written description of all project activities with detailed step-by-step description of project implementation. - Include any structures (e.g., rip-rap, culverts) that will be placed or modified in or near the stream, river, or lake, and any channel clearing. - Specify volume, and dimensions of all materials and features (e.g., rip rap fields) that will be used or installed. - If water will be diverted or drafted, specify the purpose or use. - Enclose diagrams, drawings, plans, and maps that provide all of the following: site specific construction details; dimensions of each structure and/or extent of each activity in the bed, channel, bank or floodplain; overview of the entire project area (i.e., “bird’s-eye view”) showing the location of each structure and/or activity, significant area features, stockpile areas, areas of temporary disturbance, and where the equipment/machinery will access the project area. □ Continued on additional page(s) B. Specify the equipment and machinery that will be used to complete the project. □ Continued on additional page(s) C. Will water be present during the proposed work period (specified in box 4.D) in the stream, river, or lake (specified in box 8.B). □ Yes □ No (Skip to box 11) D. Will the proposed project require work in the wetted portion of the channel? □ Yes (Enclose a plan to divert water around work site) □ No 84 State of California – Department of Fish and Wildlife NOTIFICATION OF LAKE OR STREAMBED ALTERATION FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 1602 DFW 2023 (REV. 05/01/18) Page 6 11. PROJECT IMPACTS A. Describe impacts to the bed, channel, and bank of the river, stream, or lake, and the associated riparian habitat. Specify the dimensions of the modifications in length (linear feet) and area (square feet or acres) and the type and volume of material (cubic yards) that will be moved, displaced, or otherwise disturbed, if applicable. □ Continued on additional page(s) B. Will the project affect any vegetation? □ Yes (Complete the tables below) □ No (Include aerial photo with date supporting this determination) Vegetation Type Temporary Impact Permanent Impact Linear feet: _________________ Total area: _________________ Linear feet: _________________ Total area: _________________ Linear feet: _________________ Total area: _________________ Linear feet: _________________ Total area: _________________ Tree Species Number of Trees to be Removed Trunk Diameter (range) □ Continued on additional page(s) C. Are any special status animal or plant species, or habitat that could support such species, known to be present on or near the project site? □ Yes (List each species and/or describe the habitat below) □ No □ Unknown □ Continued on additional page(s) D. Identify the source(s) of information that supports a “yes” or “no” answer above in Box 11.C. □ Continued on additional page(s) E. Has a biological study been completed for the project site? □ Yes (Enclose the biological study) □ No Note: A biological assessment or study may be required to evaluate potential project impacts on biological resources. 85 State of California – Department of Fish and Wildlife NOTIFICATION OF LAKE OR STREAMBED ALTERATION FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 1602 DFW 2023 (REV. 05/01/18) Page 7 F. Has a hydrological study been completed for the project or project site? □ Yes (Enclose the hydrological study) □ No Note: A hydrological study or other information on site hydraulics (e.g., flows, channel characteristics, and/or flood recurrence intervals) may be required to evaluate potential project impacts on hydrology. G. Have fish or wildlife resources or waters of the state been mapped or delineated on the project site? □ Yes (Enclose the mapped results) □ No Note: Check “yes” if fish and wildlife resources or waters of the state on the project site have been mapped or delineated. “’Wildlife’ means and includes all wild animals, birds, plants, fish, amphibians, reptiles and related ecological communities, including the habitat upo n which the wildlife depends.” (Fish & G. Code, § 89.5.) If “yes” is checked, submit the mapping or delineation. If the mapping or delineation is in digital format (e.g., GIS shape files or KMZ), you must submit the information in this format for the Department to deem your notification complete. If “no” is checked, or the resolution of the mapping or delineation is insufficient, the Department may request mapping or delineation (in digital or non-digital format), or higher resolution mapping or delineation for the Department to deem the notification complete. 12. MEASURES TO PROTECT FISH, WILDIFE, AND PLANT RESOURCES A. Describe the techniques that will be used to prevent sediment from entering watercourses during and after construction. □ Continued on additional page(s) B. Describe project avoidance and/or minimization measures to protect fish, wildlife, and plant resources. □ Continued on additional page(s) C. Describe any project mitigation and/or compensation measures to protect fish, wildlife, and plant resources. □ Continued on additional page(s) 86 State of California – Department of Fish and Wildlife NOTIFICATION OF LAKE OR STREAMBED ALTERATION FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 1602 DFW 2023 (REV. 05/01/18) Page 8 13. PERMITS List any local, State, and federal permits required for the project and check the corresponding box(es). E nclose a copy of each permit that has been issued. A. ____________________________________________________________________ □ Applied □ Issued B. ____________________________________________________________________ □ Applied □ Issued C. ____________________________________________________________________ □ Applied □ Issued D. Unknown whether □ local, □ State, or □ federal permit is needed for the project. (Check each box that applies) □ Continued on additional page(s) 14. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW A. Has a draft or final document been prepared for the project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and/or National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA)? □ Yes (Check the box for each CEQA or NEPA document that has been prepared and enclose a copy of each.) □ No (Check the box for each CEQA or NEPA document listed below that will be or is being prepared.) □ Notice of Exemption □ Initial Study □ Negative Declaration □ THP/ NTMP □ Mitigated Negative Declaration □ Environmental Impact Report □ Notice of Determination (Enclose) □ Mitigation, Monitoring, Reporting Plan □ NEPA document (type): ______________________________________ B. State Clearinghouse Number (if applicable) C. Has a CEQA lead agency been determined? □ Yes (Complete boxes D, E, and F) □ No (Skip to box 14.G) D. CEQA Lead Agency E. Contact Person F. Telephone Number G. If the project described in this notification is not the “whole project” or action pursuant to CEQA, briefly describe the entire project (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15378). □ Continued on additional page(s) H. Has a CEQA filing fee been paid pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 711.4? □ Yes (Enclose proof of payment) □ No (Briefly explain below the reason a CEQA filing fee has not been paid) Note: If a CEQA filing fee is required, the Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement may not be finalized until paid. 87 State of California – Department of Fish and Wildlife NOTIFICATION OF LAKE OR STREAMBED ALTERATION FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 1602 DFW 2023 (REV. 05/01/18) Page 9 15. SITE INSPECTION Check one box only. □ In the event the Department determines that a site inspection is necessary, I hereby authorize a Department representative to enter the property where the project described in this notification will take place at any reasonable time, and hereby certify that I am authorized to grant the Department such entry. □ I request the Department to first contact (insert name) _______________________________________________ at (insert telephone number) ____________________________________________ to schedule a date and time to enter the property where the project described in this notification will take place. I understand that this may delay the Department’s determination as to whether a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement is required and/or the Department’s issuance of a draft agreement pursuant to this notification. 16. DIGITAL FORMAT Is any of the information included as part of the notification available in digital format (i.e., CD, DVD, etc.)? □ Yes (Please enclose the information via digital media with the completed notification form) □ No 17. SIGNATURE I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge the information in this notification is true and correct and that I am authorized to sign this notification as, or on behalf of, the applicant. I understand that if any information in t his notification is found to be untrue or incorrect, the Department may suspend processing this notification or suspend or revoke any draft or final Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement issued pursuant to this notification. I understand also that if any information in this notification is found to be untrue or incorrect and the project described in this notification has already begun, I and/or the applicant may be subject to civil or criminal prosecution. I understand that this notification applies only to the project(s) described herein and that I and/or the applicant may be subject to civil or criminal prosecution for undertaking any project not described herein unless the Department has been separately notified of that project in accordance with Fish and Game Code section 1602 or 1611. __________________________________________________________ _____________________________________ Signature of Applicant or Applicant’s Authorized Representative Date __________________________________________________________ Print Name 88 BLANK AGENDA ITEM 8E BLANK Agenda Item 8E RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: October 10, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Sheldon Peterson, Rail Manager Lorelle Moe-Luna, Acting Multimodal Services Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2018/19 State of Good Repair Program WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 18-016, “Resolution of the Riverside County Transportation Commission Authorizing the Execution of the Certifications and Assurances for the California State of Good Repair Program”; 2) Approve an amendment to the Commission’s Commuter Rail Program’s FY 2018/19 Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) for $799,813 related to the receipt and use of Senate Bill 1 State of Good Repair (SGR) funds for the Station Rehabilitation Program; 3) Approve an allocation of $799,813 in SGR funds to the Commission’s Station Rehabilitation Program; 4) Authorize the Executive Director, or her designee, to submit project nominations to Caltrans and execute the Recipient Certifications and Assurances and other required documents for the SGR program; and 5) Approve a $799,813 adjustment to the FY 2018/19 budget to increase state revenues and property improvement expenditures. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Road and Repair Accountability Act of 2017, or SB 1, was signed into law in April 2017. SB 1 established a new SGR program to be administered by Caltrans. The program is funded from a portion of the new Transportation Improvement Fee on vehicle registrations and will provide over $100 million annually to transit operators in California for eligible transit maintenance, rehabilitation, and capital projects. The SGR program is one of the two programs that allocates SB 1 funds to transit agencies through the State Transit Assistance (STA) Program formula, which apportions 50 percent of SGR funds by population (Public Utilities Code, or PUC, 99313) and 50 percent according to transit operator revenues (PUC 99314). For FY 2018/19, total SGR funds for western county commuter rail are $558,076 under PUC 99313 and additional funding of $241,737 under PUC 93314 for a total of $799,813. 89 Agenda Item 8E To receive funding for FY 2018/19, the Commission is required by October 31, 2018, to submit to Caltrans a signed and dated board resolution authorizing the projects to be funded under the SGR program. In addition, the Commission must submit a signed authorized agent form along with approved recipient certifications and assurances. Staff recommends amending the FY 2018/19 SRTP to add funding and expenses to the Station Rehabilitation Program related to the SGR allocations. The station projects include extensive pavement rehabilitation at the La Sierra Station, platform and passenger drop off enhancements at the West Corona Station, and facility painting projects at the Riverside Downtown Station. Staff recommends adopting Resolution No. 18-016 to be submitted to Caltrans by the deadline. Per SGR FY 2018/19 program guidelines, the State Controller’s Office is scheduled to allocate funds later in the fiscal year. To be ready, staff will also request a budget adjustment to the Commission’s FY 2018/19 budget related to the $799,813 in grant funds and the related project expenditures. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2018/19 Amount: $799,813 (revenues and expenditures) Source of Funds: SB 1 SGR Program Budget Adjustment: Yes GLA No.: 004011 415 41510 265 33 41501 State revenues 004011 90701 00000 0000 265 33 90501 Property improvement expenditures Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 09/13/2018 Attachment: Resolution No. 18-016 90 RESOLUTION NO. 18-016 RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES FOR THE CALIFORNIA STATE OF GOOD REPAIR PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission is an eligible project sponsor and may receive State Transit Assistance funding from the State of Good Repair Account (SGR) now or sometime in the future for transit projects; and WHEREAS, the statutes related to state-funded transit projects require a local or regional implementing agency to abide by various regulations; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (2017) named the Department of Transportation (Department) as the administrative agency for the SGR; and WHEREAS, the Department has developed guidelines for the purpose of administering and distributing SGR funds to eligible project sponsors (local agencies); and WHEREAS, the Riverside County Transportation Commission wishes to delegate authorization to execute these documents and any amendments thereto to the Executive Director. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Riverside County Transportation Commission that the fund recipient agrees to comply with all conditions and requirements set forth in the Certification and Assurances document and applicable statutes, regulations and guidelines for all SGR funded transit projects. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Executive Director be authorized to execute all required documents of the SGR program and any Amendments thereto with the California Department of Transportation. Approved and adopted this 10th day of October, 2018. ________________________________ Dana W. Reed, Chair Riverside County Transportation Commission ____________________________ Lisa Mobley, Clerk of the Board 91 BLANK AGENDA ITEM 9 BLANK Agenda Item 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: October 11, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Jillian Guizado, Legislative Affairs Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: State and Federal Legislative Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file an update on state and federal legislation. DISCUSSION: State Update 2017-18 Legislative Session As reported at the September 2018 Commission meeting, the California State Legislature adjourned on August 31. Governor Brown had until September 30 to sign or veto bills that made it to his desk after being approved by the Legislature. Table 1 is a summary of notable bills that went to the Governor which the Commission has taken a position during this two-year session. More detailed bill descriptions are provided in Attachment 1. Table 1: Summary of notable bills and Governor’s action Legislation/ Author Description Commission Position Status AB 91 (Cervantes) Requires Caltrans to study converting existing HOV lanes in Riverside County to operate only during hours of heavy commuter traffic. Removed opposition based on amendments Approved by Governor SB 1262 (Beall) Makes the Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) procurement and project delivery method a permanent tool available to Caltrans. Support Approved by Governor SB 1119 (Beall) Allows for the 50 percent requirement of Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funding to be spent on projects or Support Approved by Governor 92 Agenda Item 9 services that benefit disadvantaged communities to be met by transit agencies spending LCTOP funding on specified improvements. AB 1912 (Rodriguez) Seeks to require all JPA member agencies to assume the liability of the JPA in the event it cannot cover its pension liabilities. Oppose Approved by Governor AB 2734 (Frazier) Restores the California Transportation Commission’s status as an independent agency. Support Vetoed by Governor California Voter Approval for Gas and Vehicle Taxes Initiative (Proposition 6) Senate Bill 1 in Riverside County Since November 2017, the state of California, either through approval of the State Budget or by the California Transportation Commission (CTC), has budgeted or programmed approximately $358 million in Senate Bill (SB) 1 funding for more than 30 capital and transit projects in Riverside County. From the $358 million, Riverside County cities and unincorporated areas have received nearly double their previous state funding for local streets and roads. To date, this funding has allowed all 28 city councils and the Board of Supervisors in Riverside County to submit more than 600 projects for funding to the CTC. In addition, on September 4, 2018, the Commission launched its first expansion in over 10 years of the Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) program in southwest Riverside County. Expanded FSP service is funded by the doubling in FSP funding the Commission receives from SB 1. Finally, public transit in Riverside County has received $26 million in SB 1 funding, allowing transit agencies to expand and improve operations and deliver capital improvements. Ballot Initiative At the Commission’s January 2018 workshop, the Commission voted 19-3 to oppose the ballot initiative, then in circulation for signature gathering, to repeal revenues raised by SB 1 that are dedicated to road repair and transportation funding. Since then, the initiative qualified through the State’s initiative process and has been assigned as Proposition 6 to be voted on by the electorate in the November 2018 general election. In an effort to clarify what Proposition 6 is, the title and summary are included below: Title: Eliminates certain road repair and transportation funding. Requires certain fuel taxes and vehicles fees be approved by the electorate. Initiative constitutional amendment. 93 Agenda Item 9 Summary: Repeals a 2017 transportation law’s tax and fee provisions that pay for repairs and improvements to local roads, state highways, and public transportation. Requires the Legislature to submit any measure enacting specified taxes or fees on gas or diesel fuel, or on the privilege to operate a vehicle on public highways, to the electorate for approval. Attachment 2 is a copy of the language, which would be added to the California State Constitution by Proposition 6. Future Uncertainty Legal uncertainty surrounds the language of Proposition 6. It is unclear what statutes from SB 1 will remain if Proposition 6 passes. SB 1 created new funds and statutory responsibilities for state agencies, and amended prior methodologies of collecting transportation revenues. Additionally, the CTC has yet to opine on what will happen to SB 1-funded projects that have already been programmed or allocated. Staff continues to communicate with CTC staff regarding our concerns about the uncertainty of funding availability for critical projects including but not limited to: SR-60 Truck Climbing/Descending Lanes, I-15/Railroad Canyon Road Interchange, Temescal Canyon Road Gap Closure, I-15 French Valley Parkway Interchange, and I-15/Express Lanes Southern Extension. If Proposition 6 passes, staff will report back to the Commission once the CTC provides an indication of its plans for projects previously approved for SB 1 funding. In addition, staff is beginning to evaluate the viability of funding contingency plans for planned projects if Proposition 6 passes in November. Federal Update Transportation, Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Bill Staff has been monitoring the progress in Congress related to the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development (THUD) appropriations bill for federal fiscal year 2019. As staff previously reported to the Commission, the full Senate passed its version of the THUD appropriations bill in August 2018 and the House Appropriations Committee passed its version of the THUD appropriations bill in May 2018; the full House did not take any action. In September, Senate and House Appropriations Committee members met to negotiate the final THUD appropriations bill. The THUD bill was being negotiated as part of a package of appropriations bills (called a “minibus”). Due to controversial issues in the other appropriations bills that are part of the THUD minibus, the negotiators were unable to reach agreement in time to pass the minibus before the start of federal fiscal year 2019, which was October 1. Given that the House has recessed until after the mid-term elections, no additional action will be taken to resolve these differences until then. Therefore, THUD transportation programs will receive funding under the continuing resolution which will provide funding to US Department of Transportation and other agencies through December 7, 2018. Staff will continue to monitor Congress’ progress to appropriate federal transportation funding beyond December 7, 2018 and will provide updates as progress is made. 94 Agenda Item 9 Attachments: 1) Legislative Matrix - October 2018 2) Proposition 6 – Initiative Measure to be Submitted Directly to the Voters 95 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION - POSITIONS ON STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION – OCTOBER 2018 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption AB 1189 (Garcia) Clarifying legislation that allows the Commission to implement a second self- help sales tax, subject to approval of two-thirds of the electorate in a future election. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (October 10, 2017) SPONSOR 1/26/217 AB 91 (Cervantes) Requires Caltrans to study converting existing HOV lanes in Riverside County to operate only during hours of heavy commuter traffic; during all other times the lanes would be open to all vehicles, including those with a single occupant. Enrolled and presented to the Governor. (September 10, 2018) OPPOSE Opposition removed 5/30/17 as a result of amendments 3/8/17 AB 351 (Melendez) Proposes to bring truck weight fees back to transportation accounts. Died pursuant to Article IV, Section 10(c) of the Constitution. (January 31, 2018) SUPPORT 3/8/17 AB 179 (Cervantes) Changes the membership of the California Transportation Commission. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (October 13, 2017) OPPOSE 4/12/2017 AB 408 (Chen) Final offer of compensation in eminent domain cases. Died prior to going to committee pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a). (March 20, 2017) OPPOSE 4/12/2017 AB 697 (Fong) Exempts private ambulances from paying tolls when responding to emergency and urgent calls. Vetoed by Governor. (September 10, 2018) OPPOSE Opposition removed 6/14/2017 as a result of amendments 4/12/2017 SB 132 (Budget and Fiscal Review Committee) Amendment to the Budget Act of 2016. Creates the Riverside County Transportation Efficiency Corridor. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (April 28, 2017) SUPPORT 4/12/2017 ATTACHMENT 1 96 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption SB 268 (Mendoza) Changes the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority board of directors governance structure. Re-referred to Assembly Local Government Committee. (September 5, 2017) OPPOSE 5/9/2017 Staff action based on platform AB 1523 (Obernolte) Authorizes the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) to use design-build for local agencies to reconstruct the Mt. Vernon Avenue Viaduct project in San Bernardino. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (July 31, 2017) SUPPORT 5/10/2017 SB 150 (Allen) Requires the state board to update and revise greenhouse gas emission reduction targets while considering vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reductions. Requires the state board to assess current and historic VMT. Requires the state to prepare a report every four years that assesses metropolitan planning organization progress toward meeting metrics. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (October 10, 2017) OPPOSE 5/10/2017 SB 264 (Nguyen) Requires net excess toll revenue from the Orange County Transportation Authority’s (OCTA) Interstate 405 Improvement Project to be allocated to OCTA and project corridor jurisdictions and requires the moneys to be spent on specified transportation improvement projects. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56. (February 1, 2018) OPPOSE 5/10/2017 SB 477 (Cannella) Allows for the extension of an existing rail corridor to provide intercity rail service beyond the defined boundaries of the corridor, subject to approval by the joint powers authority board and Secretary of Transportation. Held in Assembly Appropriations Committee. (September 1, 2017) SUPPORT 5/10/2017 AB 686 (Santiago) Requires agencies to “affirmatively further fair housing” opportunity with all governmental actions. Enrolled and presented to the Governor. (September 4, 2018) OPPOSE Opposition removed 6/25/18 as a result of amendments 6/14/2017 SB 768 (Allen, Wiener) Extends authority to Caltrans and regional transportation agencies to enter into public private partnership agreements for transportation projects. Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56. (February 1, 2018) SUPPORT 6/14/2017 H.R. 100 (Brownley) Increases the sub-allocation for local communities under the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG). Referred to House T&I subcommittee on Highways and Transit. (January 4, 2017) SUPPORT 6/14/2017 97 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption AB 115 (Ting); SB 99 (Budget) Trailer bill containing elements that will streamline transportation project delivery. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (June 27, 2017) SUPPORT 6/14/2017 Staff action based on platform AB 805 (Gonzalez Fletcher) Changes the San Diego Association of Governments board of directors governance and voting structure. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (October 11, 2017) OPPOSE 6/15/2017 Staff action based on platform AB 1069 (Low) Requires ten countywide transportation agencies, including the Commission, to regulate taxicabs. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (October 13, 2017) OPPOSE 6/28/2017 Staff action based on platform AB 1282 (Mullin) Requires the California State Transportation Agency Secretary to establish a Transportation Permitting Task Force. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (October 10, 2017) SUPPORT 7/12/2017 AB 135 (Budget) Trailer bill containing elements that allow agencies to request approval for letters of no prejudice to advance spending on SB 1 projects using local funding sources; authorizes the California State Transportation Agency to perform NEPA Assignment on transit, rail, and multimodal projects; and provides flexibility to cities and counties for adopting Local Streets and Roads project lists. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (September 16, 2017) SUPPORT 9/13/2017 Staff action based on platform H.R. 1 Amends the Internal Revenue Code to reduce tax rates and modify policies, credits, and deductions for individuals and businesses. Signed by President. (December 22, 2017) SEEK AMENDMENTS 12/13/2017 ACA 5 (Proposition 69) Assembly Constitutional Amendment passed by two-thirds of the California State Legislature and signed by Governor Brown. If passed by the voters, amends the California Constitution to protect SB 1 revenues from seizure to fund other programs and expenses. Approved by electorate. (June 5, 2018) SUPPORT 1/25/2018 California Voter Approval for Gas and Vehicle Taxes Initiative (Proposition 6) Repeals revenues raised by SB 1 that are dedicated to road repair and transportation funding. Henceforward, requires a majority vote of Californians to increase transportation revenues once passed by two-thirds of the California State Legislature. Approved initiative to be on November 2018 general election ballot. (June 2018) OPPOSE 1/25/2018 98 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption SCR 90 (Roth) Designates the 60/91/215 interchange in Riverside County as the Joseph Tavaglione Interchange. Held at Assembly desk. (July 3, 2018) SUPPORT 2/1/2018 Staff action based on platform AB 1759 (McCarty) Starting in Fiscal Year 2022/23, requires the State Controller to withhold local streets and roads funds provided under SB 1 from cities and counties not meeting their share of regional housing needs. Withheld funds would be placed in an escrow account until the non-compliant agency is deemed to be in compliance. Grants the Sacramento Waterfront Parcel and the Sand Cove Parcels to the city of Sacramento as public trust lands and authorizes the City to use the lands to promote their use as public trust lands. Approved by the Governor. Chaptered by Secretary of State. (September 5, 2018) OPPOSE 3/14/2018 AB 1905 (Grayson) Limits a court’s ability to stop projects with lawsuits against their environmental documents from moving forward if the project is in SCAG’s adopted SCS. Amended; re-referred to Assembly Committee on Natural Resources. (April 16, 2018) SUPPORT 3/14/2018 SB 1262 (Beall) Makes the Construction Manager / General Contractor (CM/GC) procurement and project delivery method a permanent tool available to Caltrans, removes the project cost minimums prescribed in the current pilot program, and eliminates the requirement for Caltrans to use its own employees or consultants to perform project design and engineering services on a CM/GC project. Enrolled and presented to the Governor. (August 30, 2018) SUPPORT 3/14/2018 SB 1119 (Beall) Allows for the 50 percent requirement of Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funding to be spent on projects or services that benefit disadvantaged communities to be met by transit agencies spending LCTOP funding on transit fare subsidies, transit connections, and/or technology improvements that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Enrolled and presented to the Governor. (September 5, 2018) SUPPORT 4/11/2018 AB 3027 (Chávez) Relating to CEQA lawsuits, specifies that attorney’s fees may be awarded only to a prevailing plaintiff or petitioner that is a homeowner, property owner, or business owner located within a specified mailing radius established by law or by the lead agency, or a nonprofit organization formed to protect the environment and whose membership exceeds 50,000. Referred to Assembly Committee on Natural Resources. (April 17, 2018) SUPPORT 5/9/2018 AB 1912 (Rodriguez) Seeks to require all JPA member agencies to assume the liability of the JPA in the event it cannot cover its pension liabilities. Enrolled and presented to the Governor. (September 11, 2018) OPPOSE 6/13/2018 99 Legislation/ Author Description Bill Status Position Date of Board Adoption AB 2734 (Frazier) Restores the California Transportation Commission’s (CTC) status as an independent agency, removing it from the purview of the California State Transportation Agency, and specifying that the CTC is to act in an independent oversight role. Enrolled and presented to the Governor. (August 20, 2018) SUPPORT 7/11/2018 100 BLANK 1 7 -O O 3 3 Amdt. if 1 INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE VOTERS SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FINDINGS AND PURPOSES (a) California's taxes on gasoline and car ownership are among the highest in the nation. (b) These taxes have been raised without the consent of the people. (c) Therefore, the people hereby amend the Constitution to require voter approval of the recent increase in the gas and car tax enacted by Chapter 5 of the Statutes of 2017 and any future increases in the gas and car tax. SECTION 2 . VOTER APPROVAL FOR INCREASES IN GAS AND CAR TAX Section 3 .5 of Article XIII A of the California Constitution is added to read: Sec. 3.5(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Legislature shall not impose, increase or extend any tax, as defined in section 3 , on the sale, storage , use or consumption of motor vehicle gasoline or diesel fuel, or on the privilege of a resident of California to operate on the public highways a vehicle , or trailer coach, unless and until that proposed tax is submitted to the electorate and approved by a majority vote . (b) This section does not apply to taxes on motor vehicle gasoline or diesel fuel , or on the privilege of operating a vehicle or trailer coach at the rates that were in effect on January 1, 2017. Any increase in the rate of such taxes imposed after January 1, 201 7 shall cease to be imposed unless and until approved by the electorate as required by this section. ATTACHMENT 2 101 AGENDA ITEM 10 Agenda Item 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: October 10, 2018 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: VanClub Update – RCTC’s Ongoing Vanpool Subsidy Program WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to receive and file a report on the public launch of the Commission’s ongoing vanpool subsidy program – VanClub. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its September 13, 2017 meeting, the Commission approved the development and implementation of a Western and Southern Riverside County ongoing vanpool subsidy program. The program, branded as “VanClub”, is funded for a three-year period through a combination of 2009 Measure A Western County Commuter Assistance and Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee funding. The Commission contracted with two third-party leasing vendors (Enterprise Rideshare and the California Vanpool Authority, or CalVans) to provide 7 to 15-passenger vans and large sport utility vehicles to commuters traveling to and from their worksites. Approved vanpools receive up to $400 per month from VanClub to offset the cost of their third-party vanpool lease, and in return, report their trip statistics and out of pockets costs to either the Commission or to CalVans. These statistics are reported each month to the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) National Transit Database (NTD), similar to other transit reporting. As a result of this statistical and ridership reporting, approximately two years later, the vanpool program will begin generating sufficient FTA Section 5307 funding return to the Commission to sustain the VanClub program indefinitely. The VanClub program has made significant progress in a relatively short time frame. Since the Commission approval last September, staff has worked diligently to procure consultant services, develop program policies, procedures, and guidelines, develop an on-line program application and reporting system, develop outreach materials, promotional items, and marketing plan, and has coordinated the program launch with a variety of stakeholders. Vanpools that lease their vehicle through Enterprise Rideshare apply online and report their monthly trip statistics and costs into VanClub.net. The Commission staff and consultants review and approve the vanpool 102 Agenda Item 10 applications, work directly with the vanpool groups and their leasing vendor, review their monthly reports and submit their statistics into the National Transit Database (NTD). The CalVans program is completely turn-key, where CalVans staff approve vanpool applications, work directly with the vanpool groups, review monthly reports and input the monthly statistics directly into the NTD. For the Enterprise Rideshare vanpools, a soft launch was instituted where known vanpools were invited to apply to VanClub.net in a staggered approach over a three month period. This process began in mid-April, when 16 vanpools applied and began to receive their subsidy starting on May 1st. By June 1st, an additional 33 vanpools were approved and by the end of July, 62 vanpools have applied and have been approved for an ongoing VanClub subsidy. The Commission continues to work with an additional 17 vanpools and anticipates they will be transitioned into the program by the time this report is presented at the September Commission meeting. To highlight the program’s effectiveness, the June reporting from 49 vanpools demonstrates that a VanClub vanpool commutes on average 21 days each month, has a seating capacity of 7.2 seats (including the driver), carries for each trip an average of 4.8 passengers, pays a total monthly average lease cost of $976 and receives an average VanClub subsidy of $384 per month. Assuming the vanpool passengers would have driven alone if they were not in a vanpool, for the month of June, 184 vehicles were removed each day from the roadways, eliminating 300,000 miles of travel! The CalVans program is dependent on the agricultural industry in Western Riverside County. Those vanpools traditionally are not formed until mid-summer. CalVans has 6 vanpools that are enrolled for the upcoming agricultural season, and anticipates an additional 10 vanpools enrolled in the CalVans program in this upcoming fiscal year as more farmers/growers become aware of the new VanClub subsidy program. In addition to a short presentation to the Committee, at the conclusion of the September Commission meeting the Commissioners and guests are invited to step outside to look at vanpool vehicles to further celebrate the public launch of the Commission’s newest program, VanClub. 103 Vanpool Incentive Program Update Riverside County Transportation Commission October 10, 2018 Brian Cunanan Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager Call Boxes 3 Receive up to $400 per month to offset cost of vanpool lease VanClub Example: City of Irvine to City of Riverside 41 miles one way = 1,886 miles traveled in August 32 MPG 58.9 gallons = $207 Maintenance ($.05/mile)=$94 Single driver scenario does NOT include car payment or vehicle lease amount $301 VanClub Example: City of Irvine to City of Riverside 41 miles one way = 1,886 miles traveled in August vs. 32 MPG 23 MPG 58.9 gallons = $207 82.0 gallons = $289 Lease = $1,366 -$400 VanClub Subsidy = $966 Maintenance ($.05/mile)=$94 $1,255 Single driver scenario does NOT include car payment or vehicle lease amount $301 VanClub Example: City of Irvine to City of Riverside 41 miles one way = 1,886 miles traveled in August vs. 32 MPG 23 MPG 58.9 gallons = $207 82.0 gallons = $289 $48 Lease = $1,366 -$400 VanClub Subsidy = $966 Split by 6 vanpoolers Maintenance ($.05/mile)=$94 $161 $301 Single driver scenario does NOT include car payment or vehicle lease amount $209 VanClub Example: City of Irvine to City of Riverside 41 miles one way = 1,886 miles traveled in August $1,255/6 = vs. 32 MPG 23 MPG 58.9 gallons = $207 82.0 gallons = $289 Lease = $1,366 -$400 VanClub Subsidy = $966 Split by 6 vanpoolers Maintenance ($.05/mile)=$94 $92 saved vanpooling with subsidy over driving solo Single driver scenario does NOT include car payment or vehicle lease amount Savings higher when car payment or vehicle lease factored in for single driver scenario $301 VanClub Example: City of Irvine to City of Riverside 41 miles one way = 1,886 miles traveled in August $48 $161 $209 9 Bonus Benefits: SAVE TIME Access to carpool lanes SAVE TIME & MONEY Free or reduced tolls COMMUTE GREEN Reduced SOV emissions DRIVE LESS. SMILE MORE. Higher quality of life vs. SAVE MONEY Estimated $92 savings per month $1,104 savings per year* * Irvine to Riverside scenario 10 Minimum Qualifications •Minimum 5 participants to start •Commute more than 30 miles each day •Commute 12 or more days each month •Western Riverside County destination Approved Lease Providers Receive up to $400 per month to offset cost of vanpool lease 11 •Soft launch in May 2018 •Up to 71 vanpools as of October 2018 65 vans 6 vans 12 22 commute days* 4.8 passengers per trip* $1,001 lease cost per month* 77 miles per day* *Averages based on reports through August 2018 •Soft launch in May 2018 •Up to 71 vanpools as of October 2018 13 Origin # of Vans Western Riverside County 22 Orange County 22 Los Angeles County 8 San Diego County 6 San Bernardino Valley, Mountains & Morongo Basin 5 Greater Victorville and Barstow High Desert areas 5 Coachella Valley 1 Where are they coming from? 14 Origin # of Vans Western Riverside County 22 Orange County 22 Los Angeles County 8 San Diego County 6 San Bernardino Valley, Mountains & Morongo Basin 5 Greater Victorville and Barstow High Desert areas 5 Coachella Valley 1 Destination # of Vans Riverside 29 Corona/Norco 20 Moreno Valley 14 Hemet (CalVans) 6 Where are they going? Where are they coming from? 15 Origin # of Vans Western Riverside County 22 Orange County 22 Los Angeles County 8 San Diego County 6 San Bernardino Valley, Mountains & Morongo Basin 5 Greater Victorville and Barstow High Desert areas 5 Coachella Valley 1 Origin # of Vans University of California, Riverside 25 Naval Surface Warfare Center 19 March Air Force Base 13 Rancho Nuevo Harvesting 6 LA County Metropolitan Water District 1 Christie Digital System 1 Simpson Strong-Tie, Inc.1 Corona Fundamental Intermediate School 1 DMV Riverside East 1 Fisher & Paykel Healthcare 1 Where are they going? Where are they coming from? 16 30,440 trips reduced 1,117,135 miles reduced 1.8 tons emissions reduced Program indicators from inception, May 2018 to August 2018: Special thanks to $400 per Month Vanpool Subsidy Vanpool Inputs Data into VanClub System RCTC Reports to FTA Results in FTA Funding to RCTC •Van Lease •Insurance •Maintenance 18 The First Rule of VanClub: TELL EVERYONE about VanClub! 19 The First Rule of VanClub: TELL EVERYONE about VanClub! VanClub.net 844-VANCLUB 20 Questions? VanClub.net 844-VANCLUB