Loading...
01 January 27, 2014 Technical Advisory CommitteeCOMM-TAC-00024 TIME: DATE: LOCATION: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda. 10:00 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. January 27, 2014 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor Riverside, CA 92501 In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact the Riverside County Transportation Commission at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Self -Introductions 3. Approval of November 18, 2013 Minutes 4. Public Comments (This is for comments on items not listed on agenda. Comments relating to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is before the Committee.) 5. 2013 FTIP Update (Attachment) 6. 2015 FTIP Update — Transportation Control Measure Projects (Attachment) 7. Draft FFY 2013/14 Delivery Plan (Attachment) 8. Multi -Funding Call for Projects — Commission Approval (Attachment) MOU — Project Delivery 9. 2014 STIP Submittal (Attachment) 10. Active Transportation Program — Draft Guidelines and Upcoming Call for Projects (Attachment) 11. TIGER VI Funding Opportunities (Verbal Presentation) 12. Measure A Local Streets and Roads Mid -Year Revenue Projections (Attachment) 13. MSRC's Clean Transportation Funding — Traffic Signal Coordination Program (Verbal Presentation) Technical Advisory Committee Meeting January 27, 2014 Page 2 14. Local Assistance Update (Verbal Presentation) 15. January Commission Meeting Highlights (Verbal Presentation) 16. Other Business 17. Adjournment (The next meeting will be March 17 in Beaumont.) AGENCY BANNING BEAUMONT BLYTHE CVAG CALIMESA TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 27, 2014 TAC MEMBER ALTERNATE DUANE BURK Kahono Oei Director of Public Works KISHEN PRATHIVADI !Kevin Hughes Assistant Director of Public ~ ARMANDO BALDIZZONE Director of Public Works V Frank Luckino Finance Director MICHAEL SHOBERG I Allyn Waggle V--Transportation Program Manager Deputy Director MICHAEL THORNTON City Engineer Bob French Public Works Director PRINT NAME }(~IV(l 0~ ~eJ~ -r. W<f-'thf~ i~~~L-\'1 tL,a;MQ_ -r ~ SIGNATURE ~ tfUv_0 Jtt; 0CALTRANS l=~::GLo~IAMisra.re ~i~::::~~~J {w~ Yeu"_I_ I {-lz-.-------------i "0S COACHELLA , HABIB MOTLAGH City Engineer BILL SIMONS Interim City Engineer JONATHAN HOY City Engineer ~ l''Ll.5 ·\ ~ ~~, ~ ~, -:z------·----Maritza Martinez Interim Public Works Director CORONA ____ ._ ___ -tNE~SON N_ELSON . R~be_rt Mo~i~ . _ I~ A .--,~ ~ Acting Pubhc Works Director Principal C1v1I Engineer ~ f"t/fo4, e~ ~ .... ______ _ DESERT HOT RUDY ACOSTA DanielPo_rras v . ~V\•~-~~<·"'-...,. ---------~ ----~( __ SPRINGS Acting Public Works Director Public Works Contract Engineer ORGE ALVAREZ HEMET .. A \f. IV\ JORGE BIAGIONI Engineering Director/City Engineer INDIAN WELLS KEN SEUMALO Jt;2z INDIO -------1GRANT EKLUND Public Works Director/City Engineer JURUPA VALLEY TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 27, 2014 Victor Monz ~~ Bondie Baker Assistant Engineer II LA QUINTA / !TIMOTHY JONASSON rryan McKinney I ~ ""'-j qvuiS~ V\.-Public Works Dir~ct~r/City_E_n:eer Princip-al ~ngineer LAKE ELSINORE ATI ESKANDARI Interim Public Works Director MENIFEE JONATHAN SMITH Robert Johnson Acting City Engineer Interim City Manager MORENO VALLEY t-HMAD-ANSARI Prem Kumar Public Works Director/City Engineer Deputy Public Works Direct' Assistant City Engineer / MURRIETA I BOB MOEHLING--Jim Holsten City Engineer Assistant City Manager NORCO BILL THOMPSON Lori Askew Director of Public Works Sr. Engineer PALM DESERT PALM SPRINGS PERRlff JV" BO CHEN City Engineer DAVE BARAKIAN Director of Public Works/ City Engineer HABIB MOTLAGH City Engineer ----·---· --------.. RT A --4GQRDcm-RGBINSGN L I Director of Planning --·---· ~ JL ori A ~ ku. R..V... Pf) IA RANCHO MIRAGE I BRUCE HARRY I Director of Public Works RIVERSIDE TOM BOYD Public Works Director RIVERSIDE C~NTYIJUAN PEREZ \l,., , Director of Transportation SAN JACINTO I HABIB MOTLAGH ~/' City Engineer -----··--SUNLINE JOE FORGIARINI Director of Transit Planning TEMECULA IAMERATTAR Acting City Engineer DAN YORK Director of Public Works/City Engineer RUTHANNE TAYLOR-BERGER Deputy Executive Director TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 27, 2014 Mark Diercks Transportation Engineer Savat Khamphou Lorelle Moe-Lu~1) Senior Planner .. 1 I Bill Enos City Engineer Farshid Mohammadi Engineering Manager Patty Romo Deputy Director of Transportation Greg Butler 41,~JJe~ P?e fl#£11K1flt!/ .j312vce... 1-h.----, Assistant City Manag~~----··-1 ~r31t-Janet Morales Administrative Assistant Donna Dean Program Manager ~ )__ ~ l~p +;ir.s kcL fv1c ~ M.f\-q_J,( ....... "-~-- AGENCY ----------·--------KGfc Q{c Tc_ --~--·----------------------O(e,Tc . ---------Cifj r0f t101eno Y~;, , ---------------------Mo12-e:.Jo \)A u.,e,, y C 1-.hi of /Ax\a. ?f ~" .. )'""""' J:.-' G 1 +c)-ct bc:o_ L'. rr. c t -y\-__ R~vo&ti~:dz G.:,J..vtfw I ~txC/ --~ Lr/£ /1-;,~c:x·1 A Te~ Cc. \"\·ro.~ . ., -Pl" ..... n" "J-r------------·------TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 27, 2014 NAME TELEPHONE OR E-MAIL -+lv~ -OLit<t<~ t·«------------·-l-/r,,, O~ Ct l v il /\t '-->-----------·---------·-------·---------· ----------------------~ -(1S!)--~/3-3/C?O Ve7 NfHPrD /y.j.:s;ve/ C?/?rrJL?/d ~~y__~, C2(g I E--pic LEMJ t S E{?-1 C..LrE.. ~ Mo·JAL .. o~6 -------12. \~ \Ht) ~ "'--~_\ r±hom6'-:>c:..<J')@ ~-f:\s1~~ ~O~ Hb'\~~~~duQLQ~~~-v-'\_\,__l~---__ 1 '(L~~-E-~cQ b-co~\_;~-v,c~vYtCh,Y-C,j ._cor~~' _ Rv-J Al ~ I ( r nu I £ ~ r c. + I YVi c.-, • u "r o ---------I (} J\\J1\ ClN GVt1_l:zdo --------------(11'/) '/Gf 3 --~ lf'f O Fred A~?t'lol/1001« -"ft ___ lrtd~ L!J_Ea/IJo c i:~"l ~~\ , C ~1JL o,_~~-S\_~1:L.C_.----·----·-9raa 9o9-~~3-4\4{ c-----·----~°"'"~-i·-K\~"\:~r e cicrt ' c~. ~\/ ----··--·-----~---------------·--------------·--·--~ ------·-----------------·~---·--·-----·-·-·-----------··--·-·-·------------------------·--·~-------- MINUTES TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Monday, November 18, 2013 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was called to order at 10:00 a.m. at the Riverside County Transportation Commission, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA. 2. SELF -INTRODUCTIONS Members Present: Ahmad Ansari, City of Moreno Valley Dave Barakian, City of Palm Springs Armando Baldizzone, City of Blythe Mark Diercks, City of Palm Desert Grant Eklund, City of Indio Jonathan Hoy, City of Coachella Kevin Hughes, City of Beaumont Prem Kumar, City of Moreno Valley Lorelle Moe -Luna, Riverside Transit Agency Bob Moehling, City of Murrieta Farshid Mohammadi, City of Riverside Victor Monz, City of Hemet Habib Motlagh, Cities of Canyon Lake, Perris, and San Jacinto Robert Morin, City of Corona Kahono Oei, City of Banning Ken Seumalo, City of Indian Wells Michael Shoberg, CVAG Bill Simons, City of Cathedral City Roy Stephenson, City ofJurupa Valley Michael Thornton, City of Calimesa Others Present: Grace Alvarez, RCTC Randy Anstine, City of Calimesa Ruben Castaneda, City of Eastvale Eric DeHate, RCTC Shirley Gooding, RCTC Jillian Guizado, RCTC Leif Lovegren, Riverside Transit Agency Eric Lewis, City of Moreno Valley Rafael Martinez, City of Menifee Shirley Medina, RCTC Nelson Nelson, City of Corona Roy Null, County of Riverside Eliza Yu, RCTC Technical Advisory Committee Meeting November 18, 2013 Page 2 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes were approved as submitted. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. 5. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION CHANGES Jillian Guizado, RCTC, reported that at the June 2013 Budget and Implementation Committee meeting, the FY 2013/14 SB 821 list of projects was approved. There were concerns over bike projects being adversely affected by the current evaluation criteria, environmental justice concerns, and the east/west balance. The evaluation criteria were last updated in 1995. A subcommittee of 15 TAC volunteers was formed to review the SB 821 program. On November 7, the subcommittee convened with 8 of the volunteers. The subcommittee recommended changing the annual call for SB 821 projects to a bi-annual call. The first call would be released the first Monday of February and close the last Thursday of April. Whatever funds were received the first fiscal year would be combined with the funds from the year the call is released, resulting in two years of LTF. She responded to various questions and reported that the next subcommittee meeting will be after the next TAC meeting on January 27, 2014. M/S/C (Motlagh/Moehling) to approve the bi-annual call for projects 6. 2015 FTIP UPDATE Eric DeHate, RCTC, provided an update on the 2015 FTIP. He thanked the agencies that turned in their FTIP sheets and reminded the TAC that the FTIP sheets for review were sent out on August 28 and August 29. Many agencies responded with markups to current FTIP sheets by September 30. He further stated that new project sheets were due October 7 and to date there are seven agencies that have not submitted their markups for inclusion in the 2015 FTIP. They may have submitted state highway projects, but may have forgotten to submit local highway projects or vice versa. In order to make changes to projects in the 2015 FTIP, changes must be made by close of business Monday, November 25. He further stated that projects submitted after that date will be carried over as they are. He reminded the TAC that any new projects that need to be added due to the Multi -Funding Call for projects will be added by RCTC staff after the ranking is completed. Mr. DeHate said that the FTIP update is an important process that ensures projects do not encounter delays during the transition from the expiring FTIP and the new FTIP. He encouraged the TAC to see him following the meeting if they have any questions or concerns. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting November 18, 2013 Page 3 7. MULTI -FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS - Status of STP and MARA Evaluations - Draft CMAQ/TAP Recommendations Shirley Medina, RCTC, provided a draft CMAQ/TAP recommendation spreadsheet and reported that there was enough CMAQ money available to fund the projects that qualified for CMAQ including the Commission's SR-60 truck climbing lane project. The TAP program is from MAP-21 and is a restructure of the TE program and also eliminates some project categories. The Governor has his own program called the Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) that focuses on bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The California Transportation Commission is expected to come out with its draft ATP guidelines December 11. Interim CMAQ guidelines came out last week. There are three projects that requested design money. This call is for PA&ED or construction. Right of way was only to be considered on a case -by -case basis, e.g. bicycle lane projects that might need a few more feet. Ms Medina highlighted some of the projects and said staff will meet with various cities to discuss their projects. RCTC's consultant will provide the air quality and cost benefit and consistency with RTP/SCS scored. The consultant requires more information from some agencies regarding their applications and will send a list of the missing data so he can perform the calculations. She also pointed out that the Corona Foothill Parkway project scored 29 points and received special consideration since it is already out to bid and the low bid extended the bid deadline, which will expire December 22. The evaluation committee felt strongly about moving forward with the recommendation for regional arterial funds. The Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee will have an agenda item approving MARA funds for this project on November 25. The rest of the recommendations will go to the Commission in January 2014. Ms. Medina said there will be another evaluation committee meeting either December 9 or December 16 to complete the scoring. 8. LOCAL ASSISTANCE UPDATE There was no update. 9. NOVEMBER COMMISSION MEETING HIGHLIGHTS Ms. Medina reported that the Commission meeting mainly consisted of the SB 821 item and many Resolutions of Necessity regarding the 91 CIP. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting November 18, 2013 Page 4 10. OTHER BUSINESS Due to the TAC Vice Chair replacing the Chair who is no longer a representative, the TAC unanimously nominated and elected Habib Motlagh, cities of Canyon Lake, Perris, and San Jacinto, Vice Chair effective January 2014. 11. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee, the meeting adjourned at approximately 10:47 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Shirley Medina Planning and Programming Director AGENDA ITEM 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: January 27, 2014 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager Eric DeHate, Staff Analyst SUBJECT: 2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 2013 FTIP On September 16, 2013 RCTC staff presented updates to the 2013 FTIP and reported the approval of the 2013 FTIP federal conformity, as well as approvals for Formal Amendment No's. 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11 and 13 and Administrative Modification No's. 2, 5, 8, 10 and 12. Since then, one additional Formal Amendment and two additional Administrative Modifications have been submitted and approved. Currently, RCTC has participated in 15 out of the 16 amendments encompassing changes to 218 projects. As noted on the 2013 FTIP Amendment Log Approval (attached), all current Formal Amendments and current Administrative Modifications have been approved. The following table is the schedule of upcoming Formal Amendments and Administrative Modifications up to October 2014. After October 2014, it is anticipated the 2015 FTIP will be approved. 2013 FTIP Amendment/Administrative Modification Schedule Due to RCTC Due to SCAG Amendment/Administrative Modification No. Formal or Administrative 2/14/2014 2/25/2014 13-17 Formal 4/22/2014 4/29/2014 13-18 Administrative 6/17/2014 6/24/2014 13-19 Formal 7/22/2014 7/29/2014 13-20 Administrative 8/19/2014 8/26/2014 13-21 Formal 9/23/2014 9/30/2014 13-22 Administrative 10/21 /2014 10/28/2014 13 -23 Formal Attachment: 2013 FTIP Amendment Log 2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program - Amendment Submittals and Approval Dates 2013 FTIP Purpose No. of Projects Due to RCTC Due to SCAG Anticipated Approval Final Approval Final 12/13/2012 Amendment 1 Formal Amendment 53 10/8/2012 10/22/2012 1/31/2013 1/24/2013 Amendment Administrative Modification 23 11/19/2012 11/27/2012 12/15/2013 12/19/2012 Amendment 3 Formal Amendment 14 12/17/2012 1/8/2013 3/15/2013 3/13/2013 RTP Consistency Amendment/Amendment 4 Formal Amendment 1 1/9/2013 1/14/2013 6/30/2013 Amendment 5 Administrative Modification 15 1/24/2013 2/5/2013 2/28/2013 2/21/2013 Amendment 6 Formal Amendment 8 2/25/2013 3/5/2013 4/30/2013 4/18/2013 Amendment 7' Formal Amendment 2/27/2013 4/30/2013 3/22/2013 Amendment 8 Administrative Modification 15 4/1/2013 4/9/2013 4/30/2013 4/25/2013 Amendment 9 Formal Amendment 15 4/29/2013 5/7/2013 6/21/2013 6/27/2013 Amendment 10 Administrative Modification 4 5/28/2013 6/4/2013 6/28/2013 6/25/2013 Amendment 11 Formal Amendment 10 6/27/2013 7/2/2013 8/23/2013 9/5/2013 Amendment 12 Administrative Modification 6 7/24/2013 7/31/2013 8/30/2013 8/22/2013 Amendment 13 Formal Amendment 28 8/23/2013 9/3/2013 10/25/2013 11/5/2013 Amendment 14 Administrative Modification 2 9/24/2013 10/1/2013 10/25/2013 10/23/2013 Amendment 15 Formal Amendment 5 10/22/2013 10/29/2013 12/18/2013 12/18/2013 Amendment 16 Administrative Modification 19 11/25/2013 12/3/2013 12/26/2013 12/30/2013 Total Number of Projects 218 'ROTC did not participate in this Amendment 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx As of January 21, 2014 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 1 of 32 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1 October 2012 RCTC aur.... —:-- IMMX.10ro3t1410 COW, mer FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason CALTRANS RIVLS01 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP COLLISION REDUCTION PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 - RR/HY CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC W CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMNT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS Cost Increase (EA: 0M420 added to FY 2012/2013, OP280 added to FY 2013/2014, OR740 added to FY 2014/2015). CALTRANS RIVLS09 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP MANDATES PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 - RR/HWY CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMNT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS New Project- EA: OU310 City of Riverside RIV120801 IN RIVERSIDE FOR RIVERSIDE SPECIAL SERVICES - CAPITALIZED PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE (FY 12 - 5307) (UZA: RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for the City of Riverside City of Riverside RIV120802 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RIVERSIDE SPECIAL SERVICES - LEASE OF XEROX MACHINE TO SUPPORT TRANSIT DIVISION NEEDS, PER APPROVED 2012/2013 SRTP - TABLE 4, PROJECT NO. FY 13-4 (FY 13 - 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for the City of Riverside COACHELLA RIV061159 AT SR86/Avenue 50: Widen and construct new 6 through lane IC from E/O Coachella Stormwater Channel Bridge to E/O Tyler St. Improvements include: extended ramp acceleration/deceleration lanes, relocate/realign Ave 50 and Tyler St, bike lanes, sidewalks, and reconstruct traffic signals (SAFETEA-LU 1702, CA 583, #2543) (EA: 0C970). Cost decrease based on revised engineer's estimate and schedule delay, per current PA&ED start phase. COACHELLA RIV071246 In the City of Coachella - Construct new (Non -capacity) Ave 52 Grade Separation overhead structure spanning over UPRR mainline tracks and Grapefruit Blvd/Hwy 111, from Shady Ln to approx 600' E/O Industrial Way/Tyler St. Improvements incl: Reconfig connection from Ave 52 to Grapefruit Blvd/Hwy 111, bike Ins, sidewalks, retaining walls, reconst traffic sigs/driveways, remove existing at -grade crossing. Reprogramming of funding mainly needed to utilize CITY funding for R/W and increase CMAQ in construction. Minor project description made to correct the problem in the database with ft (" instead of') - abbreviation to the crossing at the end of the project description was needed to stay within the character limitation. Additionally, Sec 125 Surface Transportation Priorities funding was deleted and FFY 2009 Appropriation Earmark added to clarify the earmark appropriation in 2009 (Public Law 111-8). Corona RIV010209 In the City of Corona - Construct Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension 4 lane road from Lincoln Ave to Paseo Grande (Approx 2.5 miles) Cost decrease based on current engineer's estimate and minor schedule delay that does not impact the model (2014). 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM Page 2 of 32 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1 October 2012 RCTC Min"""----, twobeGoverkmptelerkatimmer FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Corona RIV011240 In Corona on existing McKinley St - Construct grade separation at BNSF Railroad crossing (project study report & preliminary environmental analysis report activities). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years JAG RIV090102 In the Coachella Valley PM-10 Progra - Clean Vehicle Acquisition Program: Fleet acquisition of alternative fuel sweepers for regional street sweeping program of major arterials, for the reduction of PM10 fugitive dust throughout the Coachella Valley ($229 toll credits used to match CMAQ in const). Reprogram funding from FY 2013/2014 to FY 2014/20/5 Desert Hot Springs RIV061161 Essential road improvements - Phase III: City Section 31 including pavement rehab, sidewalks, curb/gutters, cross gutters, ADA ramps & drainage improvements on Ramona Dr., Cactus Dr., El Cajon Dr., La Mesa Dr., Caliente Dr. (Bunch Palms Tr to Hacienda Ave); and Hacienda Ave & Ironwood Dr (Palm Dr to Ramona Dr). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years Indio RIV121102 In Eastern Riverside County in the City of Indio - Monroe Street Widening: Widening of Monroe St between Ave. 49 and Ave. 52 (Approx. 7,800 L.F.), from 2 through lanes to 4 through lanes (2 lanes in ea dir), including bike lane, sidewalk, traffic signal install at Ave. 49 and relocation of signal poles and appurtenances at Ave. 50. NEW SLPP Formula Funds project Indio RIV110831 In the City of Indio - Widen Jefferson St. from Varner Rd to Sun City Blvd from 4 to 6 lanes and widen Varner Rd from 2 to 4 lanes from Jefferson St to approx. 500' East of Jefferson St and then tapering back to 2 lanes. Ind medians, traffic signals, channelization, left -turn pockets, ded rt turn lanes on SB Jefferson and EB Varner, drainage improvemetns, sidewalks, and bike lanes. Cost Change &Schedule Delay SLPP formula funds project �a Qu'.nta RIV121101 In Eastern Riverside County in the City of La Quinta - Intersection Improvements: Modify the intersection at Hwy 111 and Washington St by adding left turn lanes, right turn lanes, median modifications, res-striping, reconstruction of curb and gutter, signal and signal pole modifications, and replacement of bus turnout. NEW SLPP Formula Funds project MURRIETA RIV100106 In SW Riverside County - I-15/Los Alamos Rd. Bridge Replacement & Widening: Replacement of existing two lane overcrossing at Los Alamos Rd. and Interstate 15 with a four lane overcrossing (gap closure), bringing the bridge vertical clearance to Caltrans Standards. Cost Change and Schedule Delay SLPP formula funded project Palm Desert RIV071243 In the City of Palm Desert - Free right turn lane-WB Fred Waring Dr to NB Hwy 111: Reconfiguration of a free right turn lane at the intersection from West Bound Fred Waring Dr to north bound Hwy 111 ($61 toll credits used to match CMAQ in construction). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years Palm Desert RIV071255 In the City of Palm Desert - Mid Valley Bike Path: Construct a 6.5 mile class 1 Bike Path along the northern city limits between S/O Washington St. and N/O Monterey Ave. Schedule Delay Palm Desert RIV031208 At I-10/Monterey Ave IC - Reconfigure IC: Construct new WB entry ramp and realign/relocate WB exit ramp (EA: OF050), New project in the 2013 FTIP quadrennial years & Reprogramming of funds Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency RIV120803 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR PALO VERDE TRANSIT AGENCY - OPERATING ASSISTANCE: FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A -RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (UZA: PALO VERDE). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency RCTC RIV120201 On SR-60 near Beaumont: Construct new eastbound and westbound truck lanes from Gilman Springs Rd to 1.6 miles west of Jack Rabbit Trail (EA: ON690) ($746 toll credits used to match CMAQ in PA&ED). Description change to combine RCTC's truck climbing lane with Caltrans SHOPP Safety Improvements per agreement between RCTC and Caltrans 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM Page 3 of 32 ROTC 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1 was Nam — October 2012 FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason RCTC RIV520109 Reconstruct & Upgrade San Jacinto Branch Line for rail passenger service (Riverside to Perris) (Perris Valley Line) (FY 07 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN). Cost increase and adjustment to toll credit utilization in project description. PTA -RIP funding replaced with Surface Transportation Program - RIP (federal), per CTC. Riverside RIV110116 In Riverside - Quiet Zone X-ing Improvements: Upgrade of 14 at -grade Hwy rail X-ing & one pedestrian only at -grade X-ing along the BNSF San Bernardino Subd. & one at -grade Hwy -rail X-ing along the UPRR Los Angeles Subd w/in the city of Riverside. The improvements are needed to optimize safety at the X-ings and allow for quiet zone to mitigate existing and projected train horn noise impacts. Description change -grade crossings reduced from 14 to 11 based on current conditions Riverside County RIV060123 In Northwest Riverside County on Clay St from approx. 100' SW of General Dr. to approx. 500' N/O Linares Ave: Replace existing 4-lane (2 Ins in each direction) at grade R/R X-ing with a 4-Ln (2 Lns in each direction -non-capacity) undercrossing (UPRR). Cost decrease based on current engineers estimate and minor schedule delay. CMAQ funds will be obligated in FY 2012/2013, utililzing the EPSP. Riverside County RIV031202 I-10 Bypass South: Construct two lanes of roadway to provide a by-pass/network facility for the 1-10, approx. 1/2 mile S/O 1-10 between the eastern end of the City of Banning and Apache Trail in Cabazon. Other improvements include the construction of several low-water crossings at Smith Creek and San Gorgonio River (PA&ED). Cost Increase based on the latest engineer's estimate & Schedule Advance Riverside County RIV060124 In Banning on Sunset Ave at 1-10 from s/o Ramsey St to s/o Lincoln St: Lower Sunset Ave to construct new 4-lane UC at UPRR crossing (non -capacity) and reconstruct the 1-10 IC ramps to meet the new street grade (SAFETEA CA438, #1261+ HR4818+HR3058) (EA:33471) Cost Increase per latest TCIF baseline agreement &minor schedule advance. Riverside County RIV011233 At I-15/Limonite Ave IC - Widen IC 4 to 6 Lns, widen NB and SB exit ramps 1 to 2 Ins, add 2 lane loop ramps in the NB and SB directions & widen Limonite Ave from Hamner to Wineville 4 to 6 Lns (approx 1 mi) (EA: 0E1050K). New project in the 2013 FTIP quadrennial years &Reprogramming of funds Riverside Transit Agency RIV091211 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - VEHICLE REPLACEMENT: PURCHASE FIFTY (50) REPLACEMENT HEAVY DUTY CNG REVENUE VEHICLE ROLLING STOCK (FEDERAL APPROPRIATION THROUGH HR 3288, FFY 2009/2010 - FTA 5309). Description Change -FTIP project converted to Lump Sum Listing per 2011 FTIP Guidelines, Grouped Project Listing Category 58 Riverside Transit Agency RIV120819 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - REVENUE VEHICLES FOR CONTRACTED OPERATIONS: PURCHASE OF SEVEN (7) MID -SIZE VEHICLES, REPLACING TYPE II VEHICLES THAT HAVE REACHED THEIR SERVICE LIFE PER FTA GUIDELINES. REPLACEMENT VEHICLES WILL BE USED FOR CONTRACT OPERATED FIXED ROUTE SERVICE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV- SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency -Project No. FY13-2 Riverside Transit Agency RIV120822 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED COST OF TIRE LEASE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA:RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Tra-s. Agency - Project No. FY13-5 Riverside Transit Agency RIV120825 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA- INFORMATION SYSTEMS: PURCHASE OF COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE SYSTEM FOR FIXED ROUTE VEHICLES, HEMET TRAINING ROOM EQUIPMENT, AND RIVERSIDE CONFERENCE ROOM MONITORS - NON ITS COMPONENTS (FTA 5307 - FY13) (UZA: RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency - Project No. FY13-8 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx " 121 /2014 - 11:29 AM Page 4 of 32 RCTC 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1" "'.. IN.,* CeNR, LenJpxb�M(*m or October 2012 FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Riverside Transit Agency RIV120826 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - OPERATING ASSISTANCE: FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A- RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: HEMET). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency -Project No. FY13-8. Project funding includes prior ears carry � g � p y overs. Riverside Transit Agency RIV120827 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED PREVENTATIVE ; 'ZITENANCE FOR FY 12-13 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB, TEM/MURR/MEN). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency Riverside Transit Agency RIV120828 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - CAPITAL COST OF CONTRACTING FOR FY 12-13 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency Riverside Transit Agency RIV120820 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - SUPPORT VEHICLE: PURCHASE OF ONE (1) VEHICLE TO REPLACE A VEHICLE THAT HAS MET ITS USEFUL LIFE REQUIREMENT (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency - Project No. FY13-3 Riverside Transit Agency RIV120821 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA- CAPITAL MAINTENANCE SPARES: PURCHASE OF SPARE PARTS FOR ROLLING STOCK UNDER THE BUS MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Trans'.t Agency - Project No. FY13-4 Riverside Transit Agency RIV120823 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - TRANSIT ENHANCEMENTS: PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF TRANSIT ENHANCEMENTS FOR BUS STOP SYSTEM SUCH AS INSTALLATION OF BUS SHELTERS AND BENCHES, KIOSKS, SIGNAGE, AND LIGHTING TO ENHANCE SECURITY AND SAFETY OF THE RIDING PUBLIC (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency - Project No. FY13-6 Riverside Transit Agency RIV120824 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - SUPPORT EQUIPMENT: PURCHASE OF MISCELLANEOUS MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE (E.G., VEHICLE JACKS, WHEELCHAIRS FOR OPERATOR TRAINING, POINJAR, AIR COMPRESSORS/GENERATORS, AND FLOOR SCRUBBERS) (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency - Project No. FY13-7 SAN JACINTO RIV111129 In San Jacinto — Ramona Exp Widening PH 1: Ramona Exp. Widening of 2 and 4 lanes to 6 lanes regional arterial (3 in each direction) between Sanderson & Eagle Rd., including left -turn or landscape median, drainage improvement, relocation of traffic signal poles and installation of curb and gutter. Exist configuration varies from 2 and 4 lanes - widening will be from 2 to 6 and 4 to 6 Lanes. Cost Increase based on the latest engineer's estimate &minor schedule advance SunLine Transit Agency RIV110407 In the Coachella Valley for SunLine Transit Agency - Job Access & Reverse Commute and New Freedom Project: Express Service to the Pass area with service to Banning and Beaumont, connecting Coachella Valley commuters to Western Riverside County (FTA 5316 and FTA 5317, FYs 09 and 10). project description change to include additional stops in Cabazon, Moreno Valley, and Riverside; Conformity Category changed from Exempt-93.126 to . SunLine Transit Agency RIV120804 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A -RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency SunLine Transit Agency RIV120805 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - CAPITALIZED PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 5 of 32 RCM 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1 Mit�' •rr**uaa z..�mor October 2012 FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason SunLine Transit Agency RIV120806 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY: REHABILITATION OF SUNLINE'S FLEET OF OLDER BUSES, INCLUDING RESTORATION OF COLORS ON BOTH THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR, AND PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT NEEDED TO REPAIR/REHAB BUSES (FY 13 - 5307) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency - Project No. SL 13-01. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120807 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE TWO REPLACEMENT SERVICE TRUCKS AND FOUR REPLACEMENT CNG RELIEF CARS (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency _project No. SL 13-02. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120808 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS: REPAVE THE EXISTING BUS YARD AND STAFF PARKING AREA AT THE THOUSAND PALMS OPERATING FACILITY (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency _project No. SL 13-03. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120809 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE TRANSIT STOP ENHANCEMENTS FOR CONTINUED IMPROVEMENTS TO BUS STOPS FOR THE SAFETY AND COMFORT OF PASSENGERS, PER COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATION (CA PROP 1 B SECURITY FUNDED PROJECT). .. New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for S-_°ne Transit Agency - Project No. SL 13-04. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120810 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS: IMPROVE THE THOUSAND PALMS AND INDIO FACILITIES, INCLUDING ROOF REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT, NEW CARPETING AND BLINDS, AND REPAIR OF PARKING FACILITIES FOR STAFF USE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency - Project No. SL 13-05. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120811 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FURNITURE REPLACEMENT: PURCHASE OF OFFICE FURNITURE TO REPLACE AND ADD FURNITURE REACHES THE END OF ITS CYCLE LIFE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency _project No. SL 13-06. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120812 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE OF VARIOUS IT EQUIPMENT, SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR EXISTING AGENCY SYSTEM NEEDS AND TO STREAMLINE OPERATIONS AND PRODUCE REPORTS FOR SUNLINE SERVICES (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency - Project No. SL 13-07. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120813 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE NEW MODERN, STATE OF THE ART TELEPHONE SYSTEM, IMPROVING THE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency _Project No. SL 13-08. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120814 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE FIVE (5) NEW SPARE FAREBOXES TO ALLOW EXISTING UNITS TO BE REPAIRED WITHOUT BUS SERVICE INTERRUPTION (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency _Project No. SL 13-09. SunLine Transit Agercy RIV120815 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - CONDUCT A SAMPLE SURVEY OF SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIDERS, PROVIDING USEFUL INFORMATION TO SUPPORT SUNLINE PLANNING AND MARKETING EFFORTS. SURVEY WILL ALSO INCLUDE NTD SECTION 15 RIDECHECKS (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency - Project No. SL 13-10. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120816 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE MAJOR REPLACEMENT MAINTENANCE TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT FOR ROUTINE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency _project No. SL 13-11. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120817 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - SPECIAL FUEL PROVISION ALLOWING A PORTION OF AGENCY FUEL COSTS TO BE TREATED AS A CAPITAL MAINTENANCE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency _project No. SL 13-12. 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM Page 6 of 32 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1 October 2012 FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason SunLine Transit Agency RIV120829 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - SOLAR PANEL REPLACEMENT: REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING SOLAR PANELS, PROVING 33 PERCENT OF SUNLINE ENERGY NEEDS FOR OPERATING OFFICES AND FACILITIES (PROJECT FUNDED BY FY 12 STATE OF GOOD REPAIR, BUS LIVABILITY AND TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency. Number of Projects 53 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx As of January 21, 2014 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 7 or 32 2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 2 November 2012 SCAG approval: Dec. 19, 2012 •v.r:(...F Ipsir.m� Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Beaumont RIV100102 In Western Riverside Co in Beaumont: SR79 Bypass Ext No. Ph II - Instal of a 3-Ln pre-fab bridges on the eastside of the Ph 1 Potrero Bridge SR79 Bypass Ext. No., extending the Potrero Blvd 0.675 mi. No. from the future SR60/Potrero Fwy IC (RIV050535), to connect to the Oak Valley Pkwy in Beaumont, including the instal of a Class !multi -purpose trail, flared intersection and tuming pockets. Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP Cathedral City RIV070302 In Eastern Riverside County in the Coachella Valley - Date Palm Dr Bridge ReplacementNVidening: Replacement of a two lane (1 In in ea dir) low water crossing bridge over Long Canyon Creek (Bridge No. 00L0043) with a six lane (3 Ins in ea dir), for approximately 350 ft. (from Varner Rd. to 350' S/O Varner Rd). Reprogramming cf funding years per HBP update of 10/29/2012. Cathedral City RIV091011 In Eastern Riverside County in the Coachella Valley - Date Palm Dr over the Whitewater River: Widening of Date Palm Dr from 4 to 6 Ins (3 Ins in ea dir), from approx. 350 Ft S/O the bridge to 250 Ft N/O the bridge (Via Estrada to the north and Perez Rd. to the south), including the construction of a raised median and sidewalk along the east side of the project (Bridge No. 56C0189). Cost increase per HBP funding update of 10/29/2012. Indio RIV111202 In the City of Indio - Ave 44 Bridge Replacement: Replace existing Avenue 44 two lane low water crossing over the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel with a four lane bridge (Bridge No. O0L0056), including 6 ft sidewalk on each side of the bridge. Reprogramming of Engineering funding years per HBP funding update of 10/29/2012. Lake Elsinore RIV111203 In Lake Elsinore - Temescal Canyon Rd. Bridge Replacement/Widening: Replace Temescal Canyon Rd. 2 lane bridge with a 4-lane bridge over Temescal Wash, 0.22 mi. W/O Lake Street (Bridge No. 56C0050). Reprogramming of HBP per 10/29/2012 update. Lake Elsinore RIV091007 In mid -Western Riverside County in the City of Lake Elsinore: Widening of SR-74 from 2 to 4 through lanes (2 lanes in each direction), west of 1-15 to the Ortega Mountains. Other improvements include turn pockets and one traffic signal. Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP Moreno Valley In Western Riverside County in the City of Moreno Valley - Eucalyptus Ave. Widening/Extension: RIV091003 Construction of a 4th through lane in the eastern direction from Redlands Blvd. to Theodore St & Extension of Eucalyptus Ave. to Redlands Blvd., with a signalized intersection. Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP Moreno Valley RIV091004 In Western Riverside Co. in the City of Moreno Valley - Cactus Ave Widening: Widen Cactus Ave from 2 to 4 through lanes (2 in ea dir), from Lasselle St to Nason St. Other improvements include the installation of a dedicated right turn lane, a 2-way left turn lane, bus turn -outs, landscaping & sidewalks. Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP Palm Springs RIV110124 In the Coachella Valley in the city of Palm Springs - Ramon Rd. Widening between San Luis Rey Dr & Landau Blvd: Widening of Ramon Rd. from a 4-Ln arterial to a 6-Ln arterial (3-Lns in ea dir) between San Luis Rey Dr & Landau Blvd., including the widening/replacement of the Whitewater River Bridge (Bridge No. 56CO287), including seismic retrofit and scour countermeasures as necessary. Reprogramming of HBP per 10/29/2012 update. Palm Springs RIV990727 In Palm Springs: Widen Indian Canyon Dr from 2 to 6 lanes (3 in each direction), from UPRR overcrossing to Garnet Ave (HBRR#:5600025). Cost decrease per HBP funding update of 10/29/2012 Palm Springs RIV090405 In the City of Palm Springs: Replace existing 4-lane low water crossing on Vista Chino at Whitewater River with a new 4-lane bridge - bridge No. 00L0052. Reprogramming of HBP per 10/29/2012 update & Technical change, correcting RTP ID to be consistent with the 2012 RTP. 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 8 of 32 2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 2 November 2012 SCAG approval: Dec. 19, 2012 lam mos Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Palm Springs RIV031206 On S. Palm Canyon Dr. over Arenas Canyon South Drainage Channel: Replace existing 4 lane low- water crossing with a new 4-lane bridge, including drainage improvements consisting of levee channelization (HBRR #: OOL0027). Cost increase per HBP funding update of 10/29/2012. Rancho Mirage RIV110130 In Coachella Valley in Rancho Mirage - Widening of south bound Monterey Ave. from 2 to 3 lanes from Dinah Shore Dr to Gerald Ford Dr. (Approx. 3,480 L.F.). Other improvements include installation of curb and gutter, drainage improvements (retention basins), signing and striping, and traffic signal modification at Ginger Rogers Rd. Schedule Delay per latest project milestone report from the City of Rancho Mirage RCTC RIV041047 Throughout Riverside County - Grouped Projects for Transportation Enhancement Activities - Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories - Transportation Enhancement Activities (Except Rehabilitation and Operation of Historic Transportation Buildings, structures, or facilities). $398 in toll credits will be utilized for STPL match for cons in FY 2012/2013. Reprogramming of funds to re-establish the STIP STP-ENHANCE- RIP TEA funds, per RCTC discretion for utilization of TE reserve funds prior to June 30, 2013. TC utilization per Abijit Badge memo dated 12/12/2011. RCTC RIV050517 On SR74 in/near Hemet from Calvert Ave to California Ave: curve, median, & pavement widening (non -capacity) (EA ON3600). Cost increase and schedule delay per latest cost estimate RCTC RIV070308 At SR91/71 Jct: Replace EB 91 to NB 71 connector w/direct fly -over connector, and reconstruct the Green River Rd EB on -ramp (EA: OF541) ($1,501/$639/$200 toll credits will be used in PS&E to match DEMO-SAFETEALU/DEMO-TEA21/STP, respectively. $159 toll credits will be used in RAN to match DEMO-SAFETEALU.) Cost increase to include Surface Transportation Program - HR 4818 (idle earmark) for the r/w phase. RCTC RIV071250 On SR91/1-15: SR91 - Cons 1 MF Ln (SR71-115)/1 Aux Ln var locs (SR241-Pierce) (OC PM 14.43- 1891), CD System (2/3/4 Lns main-115), 1 toll Expr Ln (te1) & convert HOV to Tel ea dir (0C-115); 1-15-meeting const tel med dir connct NB15 to WB91 and EB91 to SB15, 1 tel ea dir SR91 dir connct-Ontario IC (115 PM 37.56-42.94). Cost increase /addition of Prop 1 B SLPP Formula Funds per CTC of Dec. 5-6, 2012. RCTC RIV110122 On 1-215 in SW Riverside County from Murrieta Hot Springs Rd to 1-215/1-15 Junction, construct a third mixed flow lane southbound (widens 1-215/1-15 connector from 2 to 3 lanes). Technical Change to correctly include the PM miles before and after construction for signage and restriping through consultation with Caltrans. New PM pos miles are based on the agreed project construction foot print with Caltrans. RCTC RIV090902 On Interstate 215, from Blaine St SB off -ramp to 0.3 miles south of Martin Luther King Blvd Undercrossing(PM 40.2 to PM 42.5), extend the existing SB lane # 4 (lane drop) to 0.3 miles south of Martin Luther King Blvd undercrossing (EA ON890) ($230 toll credits used to match STPL in cons) Schedule Advance per current bid advertisement Riverside County RIV071259 In Eastern Coachella Valley - Mecca Community Roundabout: Construct a roundabout entry to the unincorporated Mecca Comm. On Hammond Rd & 4th St btwn 5th & 3rd Streets, consisting of a single In. traffic circle w/one bypass RT Ln for the SE traffic; mountable median aprons; landscaped center; S/W & Ped. X-ing; landscape buffer; realignment of Hammond Rd.; and an entry monument. Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP Riverside County RIV071285 In the Southeast Coachella Valley in Eastern Riverside County, just south of the City of Coachella on Ave. 56 (Airport Blvd) - from Polk St to the west to Orange St. to the east of the R/R X-ing: Replace existing 2 Ln (1 Ln in ea dir) at grade R/R X-ing with a 2 Ln OC (1 Ln in ea dir - non -capacity) across the UPRR tracks. Cost increase and schedule delay 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1 /21 /2014 - '11:29 AM Page 9 of 32 2013 FTIP -Administrative Modification No. 2 � November 2012"�- SCAG approval: Dec. 19, 2012 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Riverside County RIV111003 In Westem Riverside County in the city of Jurupa Valley - Market Street Bridge Replacement: Replace the existing two lane (one lane in each direction) Market Street Bridge over the Santa Ana River, 0.4 miles northwest of SR60 with a four lane (two lanes in each direction) bridge, Bridge No. 56C0024. Reprogramming of HBP per 10/29/2012 update. Riverside County RIV100105 In Westem Riverside County - 1-15 at Indian Truck Trail IC: Widen Indian Truck Trail from 2 to 4 lanes, including dedicated left -turn lanes to NB and SB on ramp; widening of the SB exit ramp from 1 to 3 lanes; and widening of the NB exit ramp and entry ramp from 1 to 3 lanes plus intersection improvements at Temescal Cyn Rd. Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP Number of Projects 23 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx As of January 21, 2014 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 10 of 32 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 3 mow err ---. January 2013 c...ttc0..,,.,,..o..,�.-f...� FHWA approval: Mar. 13, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason CALTRANS RIVLSI2 Grouped projects for emergency repair - SHOPP Emergency Response Program: Projects are consistent w/40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 - Repair damage caused by natural disasters, civil unrest, or terrorist acts. Applies to damages that do not qualify for fed emergency relief funds or to damages that qualify for fed emergency relief funds but extend beyond the federally declared disaster period. New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -Addition of EA 1 C780 to FY 2012/2013 Federal Lands Highway Divison RIV130101 REHABILITATE APPROXIMATELY 0.5 MILES OF THE PACIFIC COAST TRAIL - FULLERS RIDGE TRAIL BETWEEN SEVEN PINES TRAIL AND DEER SPRINGS TRAIL IN MOUNT SAN JACINTO STATE PARK. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITES INCLUDE BRUSHING AND CLEARING, SWITCHBACKS, ARMORING, ROCK RETAINING WALLS, DRAINAGE LENSES, AND TRAIL CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION (PART OF MAP-21 BILL). New Project programmed at the request of State of California - Natural Resources Agency -Dept of Parks and Recreation Indio RIV091208 IN COACHELLA VALLEY IN THE CITY OF INDIO - JACKSON ST TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALL: INSTALL A NEW TS AT JACKSON ST & MARKET ST/DILLON AVE., & INSTALL. OF A WIRELESS INTERCONNECT SYSTEM ON JACKSON ST BTWN AVE. 44 TO THE NO. & AVE. 45 TO THE SO., A DISTANCE OF APROX. 1 MILE. INTERCONNECT SYSTEM INCLUDES 2 EXIST. TS & 1 NEW TS ($38 TOLL CREDITS USED FOR CMAQ MATCH IN CONS). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrenn'a: Yams La Quinta RIV121202 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA - ON DUNE PALMS RD: REPLACE 3-LANE LOW WATER CROSSING WITH 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER THE COACHELLA VALLEY STORMWATER CHANNEL ( WHITEWATER RIVER - BRIDGE NO.00L0070) New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -per 10/29/2012 HBP update RCTC RIV071250 On SR91/1-15: SR91 - Cons 1 MF Ln (SR71-115)/1 Aux Ln var locs (SR241-Pierce) (OC PM 14.43- 18.91), CD System (2/3/4 Lns main-115), 1 toll Expr Ln (tel) & convert HOV to Tel ea dir (0C-115); I- 15-const tel med dir connct NB15 to WB91 and EB91 to SB15, 1 tel ea dir SR91 dir connct-Ontario IC (115 PM 37.56-42.94). Cost increase to include latest cost estimate. RCTC RIV090601 REHABILITATION/RENOVATION OF METROLINK TRACK, SIGNALS, COMMUNICATIONS, STRUCTURES, FACILITIES, SYSTEMS, & ROLLING STOCK. UTILIZATION OF TOLL DEVELOPMENT CREDITS TO MATCH FTA 5307 & FTA5309(A) IN CONSTRUCTION IS AS FOLLOWS: $245 IN FY 11 FOR FTA 5307 AND 5309(A); $251 IN FY 12 FOR FTA 5307; $502 IN FY 13 FOR FTA 5309(A); AND $522 IN FY 14 FOR FTA 5309A. Description change to clarify that rolling stock rehabilitation/renovation includes replacement of locomotives with Tier-4 technology and deprogramming of FTA 5309a FY's 13 and 14 Original 1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM Page 11 of 32 RCM' 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 3 mow �--- January 2013 FHWA approval: Mar. 13, 2013 _ Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Riverside RIV071271 IN RIVERSIDE ON STREETER AVENUE: REPLACE EXISTING 4 LANE (2 LNS IN EA DIR) R/R X- ING WITH A 4 LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) U.C. GRADE SEPARATION ON STREETER AVE BETWEEN LANTANA ST AND BEATTY DR., AND INSTALL APPROX. 1,000 FT OF PCC S/W ON EACH SIDE OF STREETER AVENUE WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. Cost decrease per latest engineer's estimate. Riverside RIV071272 IN RIVERSIDE ON RIVERSIDE AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4-LANE (2 LNS IN EA DIR) R/R/ X-ING WITH A 4 LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) U.C. G. S. ALONG RIVERSIDE AVE BTWN MERRILL AVE AND 400FT N/O ELIZABETH ST. ADD IMP INCLUDE INSTALLATION OF APPROX 1,100 FT OF PCC S/W ON EACH SIDE OF RIVERSIDE AVE WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS ($791 TC IN FY09/10 & $151 TC IN FY12/13 USED TO MATCH STPL IN R/W) Cost increase per latest engineer's estimate Riverside County RIV121203 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY - ON AVE 56/AIRPORT DR, REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER WHITEWATER RIVER .21 MILES E/O HWY 111 (BRIDGE N0.56C0020). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -per 10/29/2012 HBP update Riverside County RIV121204 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE NEWLY INCORPORATED CITY OF EASTVALE - ON HAMNER AVE OVER SANTA ANA RIVER .5 MILES N/O OF SIXTH STREET, REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 6 LANE BRIDGE (BRIDGE N0.56C0446). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years - per '.0/29/2012 HBP update Temecula 991206 BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD EXTENSIONS: EXTEND MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS RD (4 LNS) FROM BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD TO SERAPHINA RD; BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD (4 LNS) FROM RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD TO MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS RD; & NICHOLAS RD (4 LNS) FROM BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. TO CALLE GIRASOL New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -Cost increase Temecula RIV031215 Frech Valley Pkwy IC/Arterial Phases: Construct 6 Ln IC (Jefferson to Ynez) & ramps, NB/SB aux In, CD Lns (3 Ins NB&SB) & modify Winchester Rd IC (1-215 PM: 8.43-9.75) (EA:43270). Cost increase per latest engineer's estimate Temecula 991202 French Valley Pkwy (FVP) Phase I: Design & Construct FVP 2 through lanes arterial westbound from 1-15 to Jefferson Ave, construct FVP SB exit ramp (1 lane), SB aux lane (from FVP IC to Winchester Rd IC) & widen Winchester Rd IC SB exit ramp (1 to 3 Ins) (EA: 43270). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years and cost decrease based on latest estimate Various Agencies RIV050201 IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY GROUPED PROJECTS FOR BRIDGE REHABILITATION AND RECONSTRUCTION - HBP PROGRAM; PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 CATEGORIES - WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES (NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES). TC UTILIZATION: $649 IN 11/12 FOR CONS; $190 IN 12/13 FOR PE; $18 IN 15/16 FOR R/W; $2 IN 16/17 FOR R/W; $871 IN 16/17 FOR CONS; & $192 IN 17/18 Cost increase per 10/29/2012 HBP funding update. Number of Projects Original 14 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM As of January 21, 2014 Page 12 of 32 2013 FTIP - RTP Consistency Amendment No. 1/Amendment No. 4 January 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Riverside County RIV110302 ON I-10 IN THE CITY OF BLYTHE - PROVIDE NEW W/B ON AND W/B OFF RAMPS TO HOBSON WAY APPROX 1,800' W/O EXISTING RAMPS TO RIVIERA DR/INSPECTION STATION. THE NEW RAMPS WILL REPLACE EXISTING CONNECTION TO RIVIERA DR. Description change, Beginning PM Limits change, modeling changes and reprogramming of funds. Number of Projects 1 As of January 21, 2014 Original 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 13 of 32 RCTC 2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 5 Boa N..-- February 2013 ►c�� SCAG approval: Feb. 21, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Beaumont RIV050535 ON SR60 BETWEEN JACK RABBIT TR & SR60/1-10 JCT: PH1-CONSTRUCT NEW POTRERO 6 LN OC (3 LNS EACH DIR) W/TEMP CONNECT TO WESTERN KNOLLS (EA34141). PH2: NEW IC ON/OFF RAMPS. CONSTRUCT WB/EB EXIT & ENTRY RAMPS (2 LNS) & WB/EB LOOP ENTRY RAMPS (2 LNS) (ENTRY RAMPS INCL HOV LANE), INCL EB/WB AUX LNS AT EXIT RAMPS, REALIGN WESTERN KNOLLS AVE, AND REMOVE WESTERN KNOLLS AVE CONNECTION TO SR60 (EA34142). Cost Increase per latest cost estimate and incorporation of 2011 FTIP A-30 changes (2006 AAA Idle Earmark replaced with STPL) and transfer of STPL (Formerly TE) from San Timoteo Canyon Bike and Pedestrian Facilities to SR60/Potrero IC per TAC approval of Dec 10, 2012 Caltrans RIV120201 ON SR-60 NEAR BEAUMONT: CONSTRUCT NEW EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND TRUCK LANES FROM GILMAN SPRINGS RD TO 1.6 MILES WEST OF JACK RABBIT TRAIL (EA: ON690)AND UPGRADE EXISTING INSIDE AND OUTSIDE SHOULDER IN THE WB DIRECTION TO STANDARD WIDTHS (5-FT INSIDE SHOULDER AND 10-FT OUTSIDE SHOULDER) (EA: O0180). Cost decrease to deprogram CMAQ PE funds -CMAQ PE funds replaced (obligated) with idle earmarks on 12/10/2012. Cost decrease needed to match Coop -Agreement. Caltrans RIVLS01 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP COLLISION REDUCTION PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 - RR/HY CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC W CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMNT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS Cost Increase - EA ON510 increased and addition of new EA's OR750 and OR950. PERRIS RIV011205 IN PERRIS - WIDEN PERRIS BLVD 2 TO 6 LANES FROM RAMONA EXPRESSWAY TO PERRIS VALLEY STORM DRAIN - LATERAL'B'(APPROX. 1 MILE), INCLUDING CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, RAISED MEDIAN, SIGNAL WORK, UTILITY RELOCATIONS, AND MINOR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate and notificaton from city of Perris regarding defederalizing the project. RCTC RIV041047 THROUGHOUT RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES (EXCEPT REHABILITATION AND OPERATION OF HISTORIC TRANSPORTATION BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, OR FACILITIES). $236 IN TOLL CREDITS WILL BE UTILIZED TO MATCH STPUSTP ENHANCE -RIP TEA CONS I Cost Decrease to reflect the transfer from the San Timoteo Canyon Bike and Pedestrian facilities to the SR60/Potrero IC per TAC approval of Dec. 10, 2012. RCTC RIV520109 Reconstruct & Upgrade San Jacinto Branch Line for rail passenger service (Riverside to Perris) (Perris Valley Line) (FY 07 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN) ($330 Toll Credits to match CMAQ in Cons FY 12/13: $865 toll credits to partially match CMAQ ($7,543) in cons FY 13/14; and $6,076 toll credits to match STP-RIP in Cons FY 12/13). Project not to utilize toll credits RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIV031202 1-10 BYPASS SOUTH: CONSTRUCT TWO LANES OF ROADWAY TO PROVIDE A BY- PASS/NETWORK FACILITY FOR THE I-10, APPROX. 1/2 MILE S/O 1-10 BETWEEN THE EASTERN END OF THE CITY OF BANNING AND APACHE TRAIL IN CABAZON. OTHER IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEVERAL LOW-WATER CROSSINGS AT SMITH CREEK AND SAN GORGONIO RIVER (PA&ED). Description change to refer to the federal earmark for the Ramsey St. Extension to meet the intent of the legislation for the project funding. RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIV060123 IN NORTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY ON CLAY ST FROM APPROX 100"SW OF GENERAL DR TO APPROX 500" N/O LINARES AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4-LANE (2 LNS IN EACH DIRECTION) AT GRADE R/R X-ING WITH A 4-LN (2 LNS IN EACH DIRECTION - NON -CAPACITY) UNDERCROSSING (UPRR). Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate. 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 14 of 32 2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 5 February 2013 Fws.:*C•an+x+�a�coP-� SCAG approval: Feb. 21, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIV071278 IN NORTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY ON MAGNOLIA AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4 LANE (2 LNS IN EA. DIR) R/R X-ING WITH A 4-LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) O.C. GRADE SEPARATION ON MAGNOLIA AVE BTWN BUCHANAN AVE. (ON THE EAST) AND LINCOLN STREET (ON THE WEST). Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate. Due to Programming Capacity issues, STPL will be obligated through the EPSP process. RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIV071285 IN THE SOUTHEAST COACHELLA VALLEY IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, JUST SOUTH OF THE CITY OF COACHELLA ON AVE. 56 (AIRPORT BLVD) - FROM POLK ST TO THE WEST TO ORANGE ST. TO THE EAST OF THE R/R X-ING: REPLACE EXISTING 2 LN (1 LN IN EA DIR) AT GRADE R/R X-ING WITH A 2 LN OC (1 LN IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) ACROSS THE UPRR TRACKS. Cost Increase per latest engineer's estimate. RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIV060124 IN BANNING ON SUNSET AVE AT 1-10 FROM S/O RAMSEY ST TO S/O LINCOLN ST: LOWER SUNSET AVE TO CONSTRUCT NEW 4-LANE UC AT UPRR CROSSING (NON -CAPACITY) AND RECONSTRUCT THE 1-10 IC RAMPS TO MEET THE NEW STREET GRADE (SAFETEA-LU CA438, #1261) (EA:33471) Cost decrease and reprogramming of funds to reflect the latest TCIF cost estimate and approved funding. Due to CMAQ capacity issues, RCTC Programmed CMAQ AC in FY 14/15 utilizing LOCAL AC Riverside Transit Agency RIV091211 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OF THE FLEET: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET. Cost Increase per approved 2012/2013 SRTP A-1, and inclusion of new FTA 5308 grant funds. TEMECULA 991203 EXTEND OVERLAND DRIVE (4 LANES) FROM COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE TO AVENIDA ALVARADO/DIAZ ROAD INTERSECTION INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION OF 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER MURRIETA CREEK Description Change to include "To Be Implemented in Phases" Reprogramming of design and construction from FY 2013/2014 to FY 2014/2015. Add funds in FY 2012/2013 per City of Temecula's request of 12/20/2012 TEMECULA RIV060113 CONSTRUCT NEW 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER MURRIETA CREEK (PART OF WESTERN BYPASS CORRIDOR) INCLUDING APPROACHES, CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, & STORM DRAIN FACILITIES Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate. TEMECULA RIV62029 AT HWY 79 SO AND LA PAZ ST: ACQUIRE LAND, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT PARK -AND -RIDE LOT - 157 SPACES. Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate. Number of Projects 15 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM As of January 21, 2014 Page 15 of 32 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 6 March 2013 ram. MOM ,.«�ac«Mr�oo..co^..� FHWA approval: Apr. 18, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Beaumont RIV060115 AT I-10/OAK VALLEY PKWY IC: RECONSTRUCT/WIDEN IC FROM 2 TO 6 THROUGH LANES FROM APPROX 500' W/O DESERT LAWN DR TO GOLF CLUB DR, WIDEN RAMPS - EB ENTRY 1 TO 2 LANES, EB & WB EXIT 1 TO 4 LANES, WB ENTRY 1 TO 3 LANES, , ADD NEW EB/WB ENTRY LOOP RAMPS (2 LANES) , ENTRY RAMPS INCLUDE HOV PREFERENTIAL LANE, AND RAMPS INCLUDE EXTENDED ACCELERATION/DECELERATION LANE (EA: OG280). Reprogramming of design, RNV and construction, per City of Beaumont's request of 12/17/2012. Completion year (model year) remains 2018. Murrieta RIV071277 ON 1-215 AT LOS ALAMOS RD IC - INSTALL LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS TO THE I-215/LOS ALAMOS ROAD INTERCHANGE (SAFETEA-LU 2005 SEC. 1702. HPP #3140). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years. PALM SPRINGS RIV071258 IN THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS — TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CENTER: ADVANCE THE INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL TIMING TO BE UNIFIED CITYWIDE, COORDINATE THE COMM. EQUIP., BRINGING THEM ALL ONTO THE SAME COMM. PLATFORM FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF COMPLETE DATA & DISSEMINATION OF INFO. TO THE PUBLIC. Reprogramming of CMAQ construction funds to FY 2014/2015 (programming capacity issues); CMAQ funding will be obligated in FY 2012/2013 utilizing the EPSP in place. Toll Credits will be utilized to satisfy the CMAQ match in construction. Perris RIV091012 IN MID -WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF PERRIS - CASE ROAD/MATTHEWS RD. (SR-74) AT 1-215 INTERCHANGE: RECONFIGURATION OF THE EXISTING CASE RD/MATTHEWS RD. (SR-74) AT I-215 IC, IMPROVING THE INTERSECTION OPERATIONS AND ELIMINATING CROSS TRAFFIC CONFLICTS ON THE SB RAMPS, WIDEN MATTHEWS RD FROM 2/3 LANES TO 4 LANES FROM CASE RD TO TRUMBLE RD (EA: OP420). Reprogramming of R/W and Construction, per current schedule. Completion date changes from 2016 to 2018 but model year remains 2018. RCTC RIV520109 RECONSTRUCT & UPGRADE SAN JACINTO BRANCH LINE FOR RAIL PASSENGER SERVICE (RIVERSIDE TO PERRIS) (PERRIS VALLEY LINE) (FY 07 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN). Reprogramming CMAQ Funds and Measure A Match from FY 2011/2012 to FY 2014/2015. EPSP will be utilized for obligation in FY 2012/2013. Riverside County RIV060124 IN BANNING ON SUNSET AVE AT I-10 FROM S/O RAMSEY ST TO S/O LINCOLN ST: LOWER SUNSET AVE TO CONSTRUCT NEW 4-LANE UC AT UPRR CROSSING (NON -CAPACITY) AND RECONSTRUCT THE 1-10 IC RAMPS TO MEET THE NEW STREET GRADE (SAFETEA-LU CA438, #1261) (EA:33471) Reprogramming to eliminate the AC and to allow CMAQ obligation for construction in FY 12/13, utilizing the Expedited Project Selection Process. Riverside Transit Agency RIV050553 IN TEMECULA FOR RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY - CONSTRUCT NEW TEMECULA/MURRIETA TRANSIT CENTER - LOCATION UNDER STUDY (04, 05, 06, 07, E-2006-091, E-2007-0131, & 2008- BUSP-0131, SAFETEA-LU). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years. Description modified to include correct earmark. Riverside Transit Agency RIV130201 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF RIVERSIDE - REGIONAL TRANSIT CENTER FOR MASS TRANSIT SERVICE IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED (PA&ED ONLY) New PA&ED Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years. Number of Projects 8 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM As of January 21, 2014 Page 16 of 32 Z£ 10 Li. 86ed WV 6Z L L - bLOZ/.Z/L xspc601 luawpueuN dad ELOZ "alewgsa s,�aaupua lsalel Jed Ae!ap alnpayos pue aseaou! lsoO '(aadn) 9NISSOHOa30Nn (A110VdV0 NON - NOIlO3al0 HOV3 NI SN1 Z) Nl-b V H11M JNI-X a/a 30VaJ lb (NO1103a10 HOV3 NI SN1 Z) 3NV1-ti ONLLSIX3 30V1d3a :3AV SEHVN11 0/N ,.005 XOaddV Ol 210 1Va3N39 d0 MS„00L XOaddV WOad 1S AVl0 NO A1Nn00 301Sa3Ala 1S3MH1aON NI £Z1090A1a �(lunoO apls�an!a •alepdn loafad lsalel gad lelap alnpayoS •a6en6uel (03'8Vd) pue a31VM MO1 1V2I3A3S anowaJ of a6ueyo uo!ldposa0 "213A121 OINOJaOJ NVS 0NV N33210 HAWS 1V SJNISS0210 3901218 d0 N0110na1SN00 AH130n10N1 S1N3W3AOadW1 213H10 'NOZV8V0 NI 11V2113H0VdV ONV ONINNVE AO A1I0 3H1 d0 ON3 N2131SV3 3H1 N33M138 OL-1 0/S 3111A1 Z/L 'XOaddV 'OL-I 3H1 210d A1I110Vd NHOM13N/SSVd-AS V 301A021d Ol AVMOVOa d0 S3NV1 OMl lOnalSN00 :("1X3 "1S A3SWV21 A12131A1210A) H1nos SSVdA8 01,-I ZOZL£OAIa Alun00 ap!sJan!a d121-dI1S pue VINO 8L dad Jo; luawpuawe uo!leoolle le!oueug O10 gad sa6ueyo 6u!pund (Z9Ld0:V3) 01 Oa 0A3nN ONV 01 1S 0 N33M138 S3NV1 XnV 1nalSN003a ONV NO11032110 HOV3 NI 3NV1 M01A 03XIW V 10na1SNOO :01 Oa atom Ol 0a 110OS WOad A1Nn00 30IS213A1H 1S3MH1nOS NI 9LZ-I NO 60£0L0n121 01021 "alepdn d8H ELOZ/9Z/E gad aseaoap ls00 "(LZ00100 :# 21218H) N011VZI13NNVHO 33A31 d0 ONIISISN00 S1N3W3AOadW1 3OVNIV210 ONIOMONI '390I218 3NV1-17M3N V H11M ONISSOHO 2131VM-M01 3NV1 t ONIISIX3 30V1d321 :13NNVHO 39VNIVaO H1nos NOANVO SVN321V 213A0 210 NOANVO W1Vd 'S NO 90ZLEOAIa s6upds wlec 'bL/£L Ad u! 01021 _04 Alpedeo do uado of papaau aye sluawlsnlpe 6ulpun; ldiS Zl/L L Ad u! 6u!pun; uo!le6No/uopoolle lenloe Jo uoppdpou! pue uo!sianuo0 OV (ZO£Z£ V3) 3AV aid Ol 3AV 213013 1A10213 S3NV1 H0f10aH14 Ol Z WOad 001S NOSVN N301M :01 1S NOSVN/09aS 1V A311VA ON3a0W NI LL L060AI21 Aa11eA oua tAl •alepdn d8H £LOZ/9Z/£ gad spun;;o 6u!wweJ6wda21 '(0500095'ON 3J0Ia8)133211S 3NV1 0/M :IN ZZ'0 `HSVM 1VOS31/131 213A0 3001218 3NV1 b V H11M 39(11218 31\1V1 Z 'Oa NOANVO 1VOS31A131 30V1d321:JNIN301M/1N3W30V1d3a 3JOIa8 021 NOANVO 1VOS31A131- 3HONIS13 3)1Vl NI EOZL L LAIa eJou!s13 a)lel •alew!lsa spau!6ua lsalel gad aseW0u! lso0 (S3111N1OV 1210d3a SISAIVNV 1V1N3WNOHIAN3 AHVNI1A111321d'5'1210d321 AOn1S 103f021d) ONISSOHO OVOaIIVH dSN8 1V N011V2IVd3S 30VH910na1SN00 -1S A31NINO1A1 ONIISIX3 NO VN02100 NI OtZL LONG euono 'ZOOZ 1!JdV aoeld Tool leyl luawys!nbu!!a wo"y A/V\H pool of alnoa °leis wall pag!ssepa `abue40 leo!uyoal aO 30V219-1V ON11S1X3 3AOW3a `SAVM3AI210/SJIS OlddV2111SN00321 `S11VM 9NINIV1321 'SN1VM301S `SN1 3)118 `L L L AMH/OA18 11nad3dV219 Ol Z5 3AV WOad N01103NN00 OIdN00321 :10N1 S1N31A13A021dWI '1S 2131A1/AVM iVlalSnON! 0/3 "ld 009 XOaddV Ol Nl AOVHS WOad ' L L L AMH/OKIE 1!nad3dV219 ONV SNOV2113NI1NIVW aadn 213A0 ONINNVdS 3an10na1S OV31-1213A0 N011V2IVd3S 30V219 Z5 3AV (A110VdVO-NON) M3N lOna1SN00 — V113H0V00 d0 A110 NI 9tiZLL0A121 ellayoeo0 'II yd pUe 1 •yd yloq Jol £til.frE ;o V3 Mau ayl ppe of uogduosap loa[ad ayl of abuey0 aou!yy "(EbLVE/ZbLbEV3) 0921S Ol N01103NN00 3AV SllONN N2131S3M 3A01A13a ONV `3AV SllONN N2131S3M NOI1V321 'SdWVa 11X31V SN1 XnV 8M/8310N1 `(3NV1 AOH 10N1 SdWVa Aa1N3) (SN1 Z) SdWVa A211N3 d001 83/8M V (SN1 Z) SdWVa Aa1N3'811X3 83/8M'1SN00'SdWV21 dd0/NO 01 M3N :ZHd '(£4lbE/LbltEV3) SllONN N2131S3M 01103NN00 d11131/M (alO HOV3 SN1 £) 00 Nl 9 02132110d M3N '1SN00-11Hd :10f Olt/0921S V 2111188V21 HOVE NM18 0921S NO 5E5050A121 1NOWnV39 uosead alepdn 91111 01 loafad Aoua6V £LOZ `SZ '�dy :lenoidde oyos ..,��,.4Jo*,�..I £LOZ Il�dy g •0N uogeompoY11 and;e4siultupy - dlld SLOZ •w 2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 8 April 2013 R..>«Cmtb:rc.� <�.. SCAG approval: Apr. 25, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Rive -side County RIV071288 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE CO. IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY —66TH AVE GRADE SEPARATION: CONSTRUCT A TWO-LN (1-LN IN EA DIR) 66TH AVE ELEVATED STRUCTURE OVER THE UPRR, HAMMOND RD., AND SH-111., FROM WESTERLY OF LINCOLN ST TO JOHNSON ST ON THE EAST IN THE COMMUNITY OF MECCA. ADD. IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO TIE BACK INTO THE EXISTING ALIGNMENT. Reprogram funding years to reflect current project schedule Riverside Transit Agency RIV120826 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - OPERATING ASSISTANCE: FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A -RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: HEMET) Cost decrease per latest revisions to FTA 5311 Regional Apportionments for Operating Assistance and removing incorrect funds from SRTP table 4 programmed on this project. Sunline Transit Agency RIV120804 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY — FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A -RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 — FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). Cost increase per latest revisions to FTA 5311 Regional Apportionments for Operating Assistance. Temecula RIV62031 1-15/SR79 SO. IC: REMOVE SB EXIT RAMP, ADD NEW SB EXIT LOOP RAMP, REALIGN SB EXIT RAMP (2 LNS) W/AUX LN. WIDEN SB ENTRY 1 TO 3, NB EXIT 1 TO 4, NB ENTRY 1 TO 3 & RECON SR79S. Schedule delay is due to scope in R/W acquisition. Temecula RIV031215 FRENCH VALLEY PKWY IC/ARTERIAL PHASES: CONSTRUCT 6 LN IC (JEFFERSON TO YNEZ) & RAMPS, NB/SB AUX LN, CD LNS (3 LNS NB&SB) & MODIFY WINCHESTER RD IC (1-215 PM: 8.43-9.75) (EA:43270) Fund Source Change per Abhijit Badge direction to SCAG on 2/20/2013 Various Agencies RIV050201 IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY GROUPED PROJECTS FOR BRIDGE REHABILITATION AND RECONSTRUCTION - HBP PROGRAM; PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 CATEGORIES - WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES (NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES). TC UTILIZATION:$190 IN 12/13 FOR PE; $18 IN 15/16 FOR R/W; $2 IN 16/17 FOR R/W; $871 IN 16/17 FOR CONS; & $192 IN 17/18 Cost Decrease per 3/26/2013 HBP Lump Sum Update. Description change to adjust TC utilization, per HBP funding changes in FY 11/12. Number of Projects 15 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx As of January 21, 2014 1 /2- /2014 - 11:29 AM Page 18 of 32 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 9 May 2013 k-5,4(0.- row�a%.c� FHWA approval: Jun. 27, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Rancho Mirage RIV110130 IN COACHELLA VALLEY IN RANCHO MIRAGE - WIDENING OF SOUTH BOUND MONTEREY AVE. FROM 2 TO 3 LANES FROM DINAH SHORE DR TO GERALD FORD DR. (APPROX. 3,480 L.F.). OTHER IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE INSTALLATION OF CURB AND GUTTER, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS (RETENTION BASINS), SIGNING AND STRIPING, AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION AT GINGER ROGERS RD. Cost Increase per latest engineer's estimate Riverside RIV071272 IN RIVERSIDE ON RIVERSIDE AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4-LANE (2 LNS IN EA DIR) R/R/ X-ING W WITH A 4 LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) U.C. G. S. ALONG RIVERSIDE AVE BTWN MERRILL AVE AND 400FT N/O ELIZABETH ST. ADD IMP INCLUDE INSTALLATION OF APPROX 1,100 FT OF PCC S/W ON EACH SIDE OF RIVERSIDE AVE WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS ($791 TC IN FY09/10 & $151 TC IN FY12/13 USED TO MATCH STPL IN R/W) Cost Increase and Schedule Delay, per Baseline Agreement Amendment and Financial TCIF allocation approval of 5/7/2013. Removal of STPL funds in FY 2012/2013 per engineer's latest estimate for RAN. Removal of TC language in Description due to removal of STPL in FY 2012/2013 Riverside County Transportation Commission RIV130401 THROUGHOUT WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION. New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years Riverside County Transportation Commission RIV130402 THROUGHOUT EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION. New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years Riverside County Transportation Commission RIV031218 IN WESTERN RIV CO - NEW MID CO PKWY: CONS 6 THRU LN (3 LNS IN EA DIR) APPROX 16 MI. BTWN 1-215 IN PERRIS EAST TO SR79 IN SAN JACINTO, INC. CONS/RECONS OF APPROX 10 ICs, ADD OF AUX LN REDLANDS-EVANS & EB AUXILIARY LN EVANS-ANTELOPE. 1-215 IMP: ADD 1 MF LN IN EA DIR NUEVO RD -VAN BUREN BLVD, & 1 AUX LN IN EA DIR MID CO PKWY- CAJALCO/RAMONA EXP & FROM MID CO PKWY-NUEVO. Cost decrease to reflect latest engineer's estimate. Project fully funded -Construction funding programmed in the unconstrained years of the 2013 FTIP. Riverside County Transportation Commission RIV031218 IN WESTERN RIV CO - NEW MID CO PKWY: CONS 6 THRU LN (3 LNS IN EA DIR) APPROX 16 MI. BTWN 1-215 IN PERRIS EAST TO SR79 IN SAN JACINTO, INC. CONS/RECONS OF APPROX 10 ICs, ADD OF AUX LN REDLANDS-EVANS & EB AUXILIARY LN EVANS-ANTELOPE. 1-215 IMP: ADD 1 MF LN IN EA DIR NUEVO RD -VAN BUREN BLVD, & 1 AUX LN IN EA DIR MID CO PKWY- CAJALCO/RAMONA EXP & FROM MID CO PKWY-NUEVO. Cost decrease to reflect latest engineer's estimate. Project fully funded -Construction funding programmed in the unconstrained years of the 2013 FTIP. Caltrans RIV120201 ON SR-60 NEAR BEAUMONT: CONSTRUCT NEW EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND TRUCK LANES FROM GILMAN SPRINGS RD TO 1.6 MILES WEST OF JACK RABBIT TRAIL (EA: ON690)AND UPGRADE EXISTING INSIDE AND OUTSIDE SHOULDER IN THE WB DIRECTION TO STANDARD WIDTHS (5-FT INSIDE SHOULDER AND 10-FT OUTSIDE SHOULDER) (EA: 0Q180). Minor change to eliminate former EA ON690 and 00180 and replace them with the new EA ON69U. Correction to the standard shoulder width - inside shoulder changed from 5-ft to the Caltrans Std. of 10-ft. Riverside Transit Agency RIV130501 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM OPERATING ASSISTANCE: COMMUTER LINK SERVICES - ROUTES 212 AND 217 (UZAs: HEM/SAN JAC + TEM/MURR) (FTA 5316, FY'S 11 AND 12) New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle Riverside Transit Agency RIV130502 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA: TRAVEL TRAINING PROGRAM (FTA 5317, FY'S 11 AND 12). New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM Page 19 of 32 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 9 May 2013 two* Crow FHWA approval: Jun. 27, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Riverside Transit Agency RIV130503 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - JOB ACCESS & REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM: EXTENDED SERVICE PROGRAM (FTA 5316, FY'S 11 AND 12). New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle Riverside Transit Agency RIV130504 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOR DIRECTLY OPERATED TRANSPORTATION SERVICES - SPECIALIZED NON -EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (FTA 5317, FY'S 11 AND 12). New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle Sunline Transit Agency RIV130505 IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - JOB ACCESS & REVERSE COMMUTE PROJECT: REALIGNMENT AND EXPANSION OF SERVICE FROM INDIO TO COACHELLA, MECCA AND THE NORTH SHORE, CONNECTING COMMUTERS TO OTHER EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMUNITIES (FTA 5316 FY'S 11 AND 12). New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Universal Call for Projects Sunline Transit Agency RIV130506 IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY — JOB ACCESS & REVERSE COMMUTE AND NEW FREEDOM PROJECT: EXPRESS SERVICE TO THE PASS AREA WITH SERVICE TO CABAZON, BANNING AND BEAUMONT, MORENO VALLEY, AND RIVERSIDE, CONNECTING COACHELLA VALLEY COMMUTERS TO WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY (FTA 5316 AND FTA 5317, FY'S 11 AND 12). New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle Sunline Transit Agency RIV130507 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - NEW FREEDOM PROJECTS LUMP SUM FOR NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS (CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93 EXEMPT TABLES 2AND 3)(FY11 & 12 - 5316 & 5317). New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle Sunline Transit Agency RIV130508 IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY FOR CVAG — JOB ACCESS & REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM: PROVIDE SHUTTLE SERVICE FOR THE HOMELESS SEEKING EMPLOYMENT - SHUTTLE SERVICE WILL PROVIDE CONNECTIONS TO SUNLINE BUS HUBS AND TO AREAS WHERE SUNLINE DOES NOT CURRENTLY SERVE. PROGRAM ALSO INCLUDES MOBILITY MANAGER (FTA 5316, FY'S 11 AND 12). New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle Number of Projects 15 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx As of January 21, 2014 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 20 of 32 2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 10 June 2013 RCM Iwo - s A .gee tixsc�� t..... Cagy SCAG approval: Jun. 25, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Perris RIV011205 IN PERRIS - WIDEN PERRIS BLVD 2 TO 6 LANES FROM RAMONA EXPRESSWAY TO PERRIS VALLEY STORM DRAIN - LATERAL'B' (APPROX. 1 MILE), INCLUDING CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, RAISED MEDIAN, SIGNAL WORK, UTILITY RELOCATIONS, AND MINOR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. Cost Increase per latest engineers estimate Riverside County RIV121204 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF NORCO - ON HAMNER AVE OVER SANTA ANA RIVER .5 MILES N/O OF SIXTH STREET, REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 6 LANE BRIDGE (BRIDGE N0.56C0446). Description change from city jurisdiction of Eastvale to Norco per Riverside County's request San Jacinto RIV120203 IN SAN JACINTO - RAMONA EXP WIDENING PH II: RAMONA EXP WIDENING 2 TO 4 LANES (2 LANES IN EACH DIRECTION) BETWEEN EAGLE RD AND LAKE PARK DR/MAIN ST., INCLUDING LEFT TURN OR LANDSCAPED STRIPED MEDIAN, 5-8 FT OF PAVED SHOULDER, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND RELOCATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLES. Reprogramming of WTUMF funds from FY 2013/2014 to FY 2014/2015, per current construction schedule. CALTRANS RIVLS01 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP COLLISION REDUCTION PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 - W RR/HY CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMNT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS Cost/funding increase to EA 0M200, per RIVLS01 Grouped Listing dated May 21, 2013. Number of Projects 4 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx As of January 21, 2014 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 21 of 32 RCTC 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 11 mum ift..=' July 2013- FHWA approval: Sept. 5, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason CALTRANS RIVLS08 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, SHOULDER IMPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - MINOR PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 - RR/HWY CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSISTANCE OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PROJECTS AT INDVL INTERSCTN, (DESCRIPTION CONT. IN COMMENTS) New funding for SHOPP Minor Program in FY 2013/14. City of Riverside RIV130614 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE - CAPITALIZED PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE (UZA'S RIVERSIDE - SAN BERNARDINO) New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from approved 2013/2014 SRTP. City of Riverside RIV130615 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE - CAPITAL LEASE OF OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (UZA RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO) New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from approved 2013/2014 SRTP. Riverside Transit Agency RIV130601 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - OPERATING ASSISTANCE TO TRANSIT AGENCIES (UZA HEMET) New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from approved 2013/2014 SRTP. Riverside Transit Agency RIV130602 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET. (UZA'S RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO AND TEMECULA-MURRIETA-MENIFEE) New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from approved 2013/2014 SRTP. Riverside Transit Agency RIV130603 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED COST OF TIRE LEASE (FTA 5307 - FY 14) (UZA: TEMECULA-MURRIETA-MENIFEE). New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from approved 2013/2014 SRTP. Riverside Transit Agency RIV130604 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - ENHANCEMENT OF THE BUS STOP SYSTEM SUCH AS: INSTALLATION OF BUS SHELTERS AND BENCHES, KIOSKS, SIGNAGE, AND LIGHTING TO ENHANCE SECURITY OF THE RIDING PUBLIC, AND ENHANCE ACCESS FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (UZA TEM-MUR-MEN) New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from approved 2013/2014 SRTP. Riverside Transit Agency RIV130605 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - PURCHASE OF SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ITEMS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, BODY SHOP HEATER, SHOP AIR COMPRESSORS, SCISSORS LIFT, MOBILITY DEVICES FOR TRAINING, PORTABLE CRANE, HAND JACKS (UZA TEM-MUR-MEN) New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from approved 2013/2014 SRTP. Riverside Transit Agency RIV130618 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE (UZA RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO AND TEMECULA-MURRIETA-MENIFEE) New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from approved 2013/2014 SRTP. Riverside Transit Agency RIV130619 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - CAPITAL COST OF CONTRACTING (UZA'S RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO AND TEMECULA-MURRIETA-MENIFEE) New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from approved 2013/2014 SRTP. Number of Projects 10 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM As of January 21, 2014 Page 22 of 32 Z£;0 £Z abed bLOZ `LZ /uenuer 10 sV INV 6Z: L L- b 60Z/ 6 Z/ L xslxbol;uawpuawV dlld £LOZ 9 s;oafad ;o iagwnN Li, # IS 6011sll;oafad padnaO spund V31 d1H-30NVHN3 d1S/ld1S in yo;ew leool MI span Ilo; leuol;lppe lo; °Nato uogduosaa a;ewl;sa s,Jaaupu3 gad asea0ul;so0 1 SNOO V31 dIH-30NVHN3 d1S/1d1S H01VIN 0103 nun 39 111M S1103HO 1101 NI 9£Z$ '(S3111110Vd HO 'S3alLon211S 'somalIns NOI1V1HOdSNVH101H01SIH d0 NOI1VH3d0 ONV NOI1V11118VH3H 1d30X3) S3111n110d 1N3IN3ONVHN3 NOI1V1HOdSNVH1- S3I2iOJ31V0 £ 318V10NV Z S318V11dIN3X3 9ZL'£61HVd Hd0 Oq H11M 1N31SISN00 3HV S103f0Hd - S3111A110V 1N3IN30NVHN3 N011V1HOdSNVH1210d S103f021d a3dn021J - kiNn00 301SH3A1H inOHJnoHHl LgOLgOnRi uolssiwwo0 uol;epodsuail quno0 appanld (p)LI # IS 6ugsll;oafad padnwo 110110V uolsslww00 ELOZ/ZL/9 gad s;oafad leuol;lppe o; anp asea0ul;so0 'N011V11118VH3H HO/0NV ONIOVAHrIS3H 1N3IN3nVd - S31H0031V0 £ 318V1 ONV Z S318V11d1N3X3 9ZVE6 1HVd Hd0 017 RUM 1N31SISN00 3HV S103f0Hd - N011V11118VH3H HO/ONV ONIOVAlf1S3H 1N311\13nVd HOd S103f0Hd 03dn021J - AlNf100 3oISH3n1H NH31SV31nOHJn021H1 Z0170£LnR1 uolsslwwo0 uol;e>Jodsueil Aluno0 appanN (p)Lt. # IS 6ugsll;oafad padnaa uo110V uolsslww00 ELOZ/ZL/9 gad s;oafad leuol;lppe o; anp aseaoul;s00 'N011V11118VH3b HO/ONV ON10VdHrlSal 1N3IN3nVd - S312:10e31V0 E 318V10NV Z S318V11d1N3X3 9ZL'£6 1HVd Hd0 Oq H11M 1N31SISN00 3HV S103f0Hd - N011V11118VH3H HO/0NV ONI0VdH11S3H 1N3W3nVd 210d S103f021d a3dn0H0 -.11Nn00 301SH3n1H NH31S3M 1nOHen02iHl LogoELnia uolsslwwo0 uol;euodsuau fonoo aplsianN L # IS 6ui;sll;oafad padnaa £lOZ `8L AMC pa3eP 6ul;sll padna0 90S1nR1 gad '0 Lggq y3 0; aseanul 6ulpunmso0 '(93NV1 13nV211 IVNOIlIaaV ON) S3JOIHS ONI101-12i1SN003H HO S1N3IN3nVd MOHHVN ONIN3aIM - Z 318V11dLN3X3 9ZL'E6 2id0 Oq/M 1N31SISN00 3HV S103f0HdINVHOOHd ddOHS - N0110f1H1SN003H 0NV N011V11119VH3H 300121E HOd S103f0Hd aadn021J 90S1nIH SNVH11V0 L# IS 6ul;s111oafad padnaa 'ql/£L Ad 0; OL£0L V3 PPe o; 9seaa011l 6ulpunme00 '(S3NV1 13nVH11VN0I1100V ON) S3501H9 ONI10(1H1SN003H HO S1N3W3nVd /V\OHHVN ONIN301M `(5Z1 '0.S'n £Z) d3113H AON30213W3 'NOI1V11118VH3H HO/aNV ONIOVAH(133H 1N3IN3nVd - S31H0031V0 Z S318V11d1N3X3 9ZL'£6 1HVd Hd0 Oq H1IM 1N31SISN00 3HV S103f0Hd INVHOOHd N011VAH3S3Hd AVM0VOH ddOHS - N011V1I119VHal HO/ONV ONIOVAlf1S3H 1N3IN3nVd HOd S103f0Hd 03dflOHS ZOS1n121 SNVH11V0 Z # IS 6u1;sll;oafad padna0 '£LOZ `91 Alnf pa;ep 6011s11 Wm:up LOS1AIH _lad '06g210 0NV `0917H0 'Ond0 V3 o; ase0.1011l 6ulpun;Is00 SH3n011nd >10f1H1 A0N30H3IN3 'S1NINAHdWl ONIIH011 `Vn 3H1301S1n0101 `OIN30 JNImvitu 1NWnd `SN1OSH31NI 1nONl 1V S10f21d 1VNOIS N1OSH31NI `S1VNOIS NVH1 H3H101SISSV ONI1VH3d0/S301n301211N0 OIddVH1'S1NINAHdWl 21alnOHS'SCIH IN31SAS oIV-a3d-NON H3dVS'ONISS021OAMH/HH - EVZ S318V11d1N3X3 9Z L'E61HVd 21d0 Oq /M 1N31SISN00 3HV S103f0Hd INVHOOHd N011011a321 NOISI1100 ddOHS - S1N3IN3n0HdWI Al dVS HOd S103f0Hd 03dnoao lOS1nRi SNVH11V0 uoseaH a;epdn 811.11 al;oafad Aoue6V £60Z `ZZ '6my :fenoudde 0113S ,.��.w�w.,w+»w £60Z;sn6nV Z6 •oN uoi;e01.1ipoIAI anger;sfuiwpy - dlld £60Z 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 13: September 2013 aa Awn*C• ay}14.��~F FHWA approval: Nov. 5, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason CALTRANS RIV110122 ON 1-215 IN SW RIVERSIDE COUNTY FROM MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS RD TO 1-215/1-15 JUNCTION, CONSTRUCT A THIRD MIXED FLOW LANE SOUTHBOUND (WIDENS 1-215/1-15 CONNECTOR FROM 2 TO 3 LANES). Lead Agency change from RCTC to Ca!trans - Current Coop Agreement only includes Eng and R/W. Funding for Construction will be programmed through an upcoming amendment once the construction cost can be better estimated and coop. agreement is executed for the construction phase. CALTRANS RIVLS02 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - SHOPP ROADWAY PRESERVATION PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION, EMERGENCY RELIEF (23 USC 125), WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES (NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES). Cost increase to fully fund EA IC370 IN FY 13/14. Grouped Project Listing SI #7. CALTRANS RIVLS12 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY REPAIR - SHOPP EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 - REPAIR DAMAGE CAUSED BY NATURAL DISASTERS, CIVIL UNREST, OR TERRORIST ACTS. APPLIES TO DAMAGES THAT DO NOT QUALIFY FOR FED EMERGENCY RELIEF FUNDS OR TO DAMAGES THAT QUALIFY FOR FED EMERGENCY RELIEF FUNDS BUT EXTEND BEYOND THE FEDERALLY DECLARED DISASTER PERIOD. Cost increase to add funding for Eas IE490, IE520, IE530, and IE540 in FY 13/14. Grouped Project Listing SI #4. MORENO VALLEY RIV041045 WIDEN PERRIS BLVD FROM 2 TO 4 LANES FROM IRONWOOD AVE TO MANZANITA AVE INCLUDING CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, SIGNAL MODS, STREET LIGHTS & MEDIANS IMPROVEMENTS New project in quadrennial years in FTIP. Schedule delay and reprogramming of funds into FY2013/2014. SLP funds are competitive funds MORENO VALLEY RIV080918 IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY - WIDEN REDLANDS BLVD BETWEEN SR-60 AND CACTUS AVE FROM 2 TO 4 LANES. IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE MEDIANS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, CHANNELIZATION, LEFT TURN POCKETS, DEDICATED RIGHT TURN, DRAINAGE, LANDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS, BIKE LANES, AND TRAILS. Schedule delay of Implementation by one year MORENO VALLEY RIV090909 IN MORENO VALLEY, WIDEN THEODORE ST FROM 2 TO 4 LANES + 2 AUX LANES FROM EUCALYPTUS AVE TO SR-60 EB RAMPS, INCLUDING MEDIANS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, CHANNELIZATION IMPROVEMENTS, LEFT -TURN POCKETS, DEDICATED RIGHT -TURN LANES, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS, AND BIKE LANES. Schedule delay and reprogramming of funds into future years MORENO VALLEY RIV090910 IN MORENO VALLEY, WIDEN THEODORE ST FROM 2 TO 4 LANES FROM SR-60 WB RAMPS TO IRONWOOD AVE, INCLUDING TRAFFIC SIGNALS, CHANNELIZATION IMPROVEMENTS, LEFT -TURN POCKETS, DEDICATED RIGHT -TURN LANES, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS, AND BIKE LANES. Schedule delay and reprogramming of funds into future years MORENO VALLEY RIV091004 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO. IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY - CACTUS AVE WIDENING: WIDEN CACTUS AVE FROM 2 TO 4 THROUGH LANES (2 IN EA DIR), FROM LASSELLE ST TO NASON ST. OTHER IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF A DEDICATED RIGHT TURN LANE, A 2-WAY LEFT TURN LANE, BUS TURN -OUTS, LANDSCAPING & SIDEWALKS. project Completed and actual costs updated. SLP funds are competitive funds 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM Page 24 of 32 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 13 September 2013 ROTC arm .1,......... FHWA approval: Nov. 5, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason MORENO VALLEY RIV110126 IN MORENO VALLEY ON FREDERICK ST FROM SUNNYMEAD BLVD TO ALESSANDRO BLVD.: PAVEMENT RESURFACING, ADJUSTMENT OF UTILITY MANHOLE AND VALVE COVERS, RESETTING SURVEYING MONUMENTS, RECONSTRUCTION OF ACCESS RAMPS TO MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS, AND INSTALLING PAVEMENT STRIPING AND MARKERS Deleted Combined Project. Scope already included in RIV130401 LS listing. MORENO VALLEY RIV110129 IN MORENO VALLEY ON IRIS AVE. FROM LASSELLE ST TO OLIVER ST: PAVEMENT RESURFACING, ADJUSTMENT OF UTILITY MANHOLE AND VALVE COVERS, RESETTING SURVEYING MONUMENTS, RECONSTRUCTION OF ACCESS RAMPS TO MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS, AND INSTALLING PAVEMENT STRIPING AND MARKERS. project Completed and actual costs updated. MORENO VALLEY RIV130808 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY- GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION. New project in quadrennial years in 2013 FTIP. Grouped Projects for the City of Moreno Valley SI. No. 17( c) MORENO VALLEY RIV071242 IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY - RECONSTRUCT INDIAN ST X-ING SR 60 FROM 150' S/O SUNNYMEAD BLVD., TO HEMLOCK AVE: COMPLETE RECONSTRUCT. OF THE BRIDGE TO PROVIDE 16'6" CLEARANCE & 4 THROUGH LANES (2 LNS IN EA DIR) & ASSOC. ST. IMP. WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS (LEFT TURN POCKETS AT SUNNYMEAD AND HEMLOCK INTERSECT., RIGHT -TURN ONLY SB AT SUNNYMEAD, NEW TS AT HEMLOCK/INDIAN ST., & INTERCONNECT MOD) (PA&ED) Cost Change and Schedule Advance MORENO VALLEY RIV041052 IN MORENO VALLEY AT SR-60/MORENO BEACH DR IC: MODIFY MORENO BEACH DR IC - WIDEN OC FROM 2 TO 6 THROUGH LANES, REALIGN/WIDEN RAMPS (WB EXIT 1 TO 2 LANES), ADD NEW WB ENTRY RAMP (2 LANES), AND ADD WB AUX LANE (EA:32303). Cost Increase to add the drainage improvements for the IC modifications MORENO VALLEY RIV05053 3 AT I-215/CACTUS AVE IC: WIDEN IC FROM 3 TO 6 THRU LNS (EB FROM 2 TO 3 BTWN W/O BNSF RR TO 1300' E/O VETERANS WAY, ADD 4TH EB LANE FROM NB EXIT RAMP TO E/O ELSWORTH ST, WIDEN WB FROM 1&2 TO 3 THRU LNS FROM COMMERCE CENTER DR TO BNSF RR), WIDEN RAMPS 1 TO 2&3 LNS (ENTRY RAMPS INL HOV), EXTEND NB AUX LN BTWN ALESSANDRO BLVD SOUTH TO CACTUS AVE NB ENTRY LOOP RAMP & ADD DEDICATED RT-TURN LNS (EA0E760). Schedule Delay - model year remains 2018. Anticipated construction completion delay is associated to the timing to secure the environmental approval. PVVTA RIV130616 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY - OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FIXED ROUTE AND PARATRANSIT SERVICES (NON-UZA) (FTA 5317 FY 11/12) New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for PVVTA - Operating Assistance. 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM Page 25 of 32 4:2 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 13 r----- -rc.,kwWav-- ---w� September 2013 FHWA approval: Nov. 5, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Riverside County Transportation Commission RIV130803 IN RIVERSIDE CO - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES & RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET (FTA 5310 - FFY 12) ($37 TDC USED TO MATCH FTA 5310 IN CONS). RCTC's FTA 5310 Call for Projects covering FFY 2011/2012 resulted in the approval of a regional priority list for submittal to Caltrans for CTC's approval on October 8, 2013 (110% funding level). The Riverside County Transportation Commission recommended funding for vehicle replacement projects for Peppermint Ridge (1, modified raised top), Desert Arc (3, minivan, medium bus (cng), and large bus) and Friends of Moreno Valley Senior Center, Inc (1, Medium Bus). Transportation development credits in the amount of $37,393 are being utilized to satisfy the required federal match. SI. No. 58 Riverside County Transportation Commission RIV130804 IN RIVERSIDE CO - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES & RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET (FTA 5310 - FFY 12) ($54 TDC USED TO MATCH FTA 5310 IN CONS). RCTC's FTA 5310 Call for Projects covering FFY 2011/2012 resulted in the approval of a regional priority list for submittal to Caltrans for CTC's approval on October 8, 2013 (110% funding level). The Riverside County Transportation Commission recommended funding for vehicle expansion projects for Angel View, Inc (2, Larger Bus), Desert Arc (2, larger buses) and Care -A - Van Transit 2, minivan and modified raised to Transportation ( p) development credits in the amount of $54,484.00 are being utilized to satisfy the required federal match. SI. No. 58 Riverside County Transportation Commission RIV130806 IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF OFFICE, SHOP, AND OPERATING EQUIPMENT FOR EXISTING FACILITIES: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126, EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PURCHASE OF OFFICE, SHOP, AND OPERATING EQUIPMENT FOR EXISTING FACILITIES (FTA 5310 - FFY 12) (1 K TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CREDITS USED TO MATCH FTA 5310 IN CONS). RCTC's FTA 5310 Call for Projects covering FFY 2011/2012 resulted in the approval of a regional priority list for submittal to Caltrans for CTC's approval on October 8, 2013 (110% funding level). The Riverside County Transportation Commission recommended funding for a mobile radio for Peppermint Ridge. Transportation development credits in the amount of $115.00 are being utilized to satisfy the required federal match. SI. No. 54 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV130606 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - OPERATING ASSISTANCE (UZA INDIO- CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 11/12 & FY 12/13) New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline - Operating Assistance. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV130607 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - REHABILITATE 15 BUSES. REHABILITATION INCLUDES: REPLACING ENGINES, TRANSMISSIONS, SEAT COVERS, DECALS AS WELL AS PURCHASE OF OTHER BUS EQUIPMENT TO REPAIR/REHABILITATE BUSES. (UZA INDIO- CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13) New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline - Project No. SL 14-01 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 26 of 32 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 13 September 2013 RCTC w �- . (' FHWA approval: Nov. 5, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV130608 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - PURCHASE OF (4) NEW PARATRANSIT VANS TO REPLACE (4) EXISTING PARATRANSIT VANS. (UZA INDIO-CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13) New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline -Project No. SL 14-02 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV130609 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - TRANSIT STOP ENHANCEMENTS. ENHANCEMENTS INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO: PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF 38 NEW BUS SHELTERS AND BUS STOP SITE IMPROVEMENTS SAFETY AND SECURITY (UZA INDIO-CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13) New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline - Project No. SL 14-03 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV130610 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - CNG FUELING STATION REPLACEMENT PHASE I (UZA INDIO-CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13) New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline - Project No. SL 14-06 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV130612 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - PURCHASE VARIOUS IT EQUIPMENT, SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR EXISTING AGENCY SYSTEM NEEDS (UZA INDIO- CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13) New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline -Project No. SL 14-05 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV130613 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - PURCHASE 3 REPLACEMENT AND 2 NEW EXPANSION CNG SUPPORT VEHICLES AND 6 REPLACEMENT SERVICE VEHICLES. (UZA INDIO-CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13) New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline -Project No. SL 14-07 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV130801 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE (UZA INDIO- CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 11/12) New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline - Preventive Maintenance. FTA 5307 funds from 2012/2013 carryover and CMAQ funds flex transferred into FTA 5307 funds from CA-95-X076 in the amount of $77,464 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV130805 IN RIVERSIDE CO - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES & RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET (FTA 5310 - FFY 12) ($21 TDC USED TO MATCH FTA 5310 IN CONS). RCTC's FTA 5310 Call for Projects covering FFY 2011/2012 resulted in the approval of a regional priority list for submittal to Caltrans for CTC's approval on October 8, 2013 (110% funding level). The Riverside County Transportation Commission recommended funding for vehicle expansion projects for Sunline Transit Agency (2, medium buses (cng). Transportation development credits in the amount of $20,876.00 are being utilized to satisfy the required federal match. SI. No. 58 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV130807 IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF OFFICE, SHOP, AND OPERATING EQUIPMENT FOR EXISTING FACILITIES: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126, EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PURCHASE OF OFFICE, SHOP, AND OPERATING EQUIPMENT FOR EXISTING FACILITIES (FTA 5310 - FFY 12) (1 K TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CREDITS USED TO MATCH FTA 5310 IN CONS). RCTC's FTA 5310 Call for Projects covering FFY 2011/2012 resulted in the approval of a regional priority list for submittal to Caltrans for CTC's approval on October 8, 2013 (110% funding level). The Riverside County Transportation Commission recommended funding for 2 mobile radios for Sunline Transit Agency. Transportation development credits in the amount of $230.00 are being utilized to satisfy the required federal match. SI. No. 54 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM Page 27 of 32 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 13 September 2013 FHWA approval: Nov. 5, 2013 Rcic OWN td�nr, 1�yrtspuRwsrt <. .p' Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Number of Projects 28 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx As of January 21, 2014 1/2'/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 28 of 32 2013 FTiP - Administrative Modification No. 14 October 2013 �r si ... . k r54e Comfy (moremur SCAG approval: Oct. 23, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason CALTRANS RIVLS01 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP COLLISSION REDUCTION PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 283 - R/R /HWY CROSSINGS, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS. Cost increase to add EA IC740 IN FY 15/16. Grouped Project Listing SI #2. Riverside County Transportation Commission RIV130401 THROUGHOUT WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION. Cost Increase due to additional projects per 9/11/2013 Commission Action Grouped Project Listing SI # 17(d) Number of Projects 2 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx As of January 21, 2014 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 29 of 32 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 15 ma - October 2013`� FHWA approval: Dec. 18, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason CALTRANS RIVLS02 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - SHOPP ROADWAY PRESERVATION PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION, EMERGENCY RELIEF (23 USC 125), WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES (NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES). Cost increase to increase funding for EA: IC370 IN FY 13/14. Grouped Project Listing SI #7. CALTRANS RIVLSI2 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY REPAIR - SHOPP EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 - REPAIR DAMAGE CAUSED BY NATURAL DISASTERS, CIVIL UNREST, OR TERRORIST ACTS. APPLIES TO DAMAGES THAT DO NOT QUALIFY FOR FED EMERGENCY RELIEF FUNDS OR TO DAMAGES THAT QUALIFY FOR FED EMERGENCY RELIEF FUNDS BUT EXTEND BEYOND THE FEDERALLY DECLARED DISASTER PERIOD. Cost increase to add Ea: IE270 in FY 13/14. Grouped Project Listing SI #4. CVAG RIV131005 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR CVAG: CONSTRUCT NEW 52 MILE BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND LOW SPEED ELECTRICAL VEHICLE PATH FROM CITY OF PALM SPRINGS TO CITY OF COACHELLA (PA&ED ONLY). New project in quadrennial years in FTIP. Agency funding includes grant from Strategic Growth Council and Planning Grant from Ca!trans 2012 RTP ID: 3NL04 INDIO RIV151001 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF INDIO - RECONSTRUCT AND IMPROVE HIGHWAY 111 FROM 760 FT WEST OF MADISON ST TO RUBIDOUX ST INCLUDING UPDATING ALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND UPDATE ALL SIDEWALKS, RAMPS AND DRIVEWAYS TO CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. WIDEN OF HIGHWAY 111 FROM 4 LANES (2 IN EACH DIR) TO 6 LANES (3 IN EACH DIR). New project in quadrennial years in FTIP. 2012 RTP ID: 3A07031 PERRIS RIV131006 IN THE CITY OF PERRIS -1-215 AT NUEVO RD IC IMP.: WIDENING OF NB AND SB OFF RAMPS FROM 2 TO 3 LNS, ADD. OF WB RT TURN LN ONTO THE NB 1-215 ON RAMP (WID. FROM 2 TO 3 LANES, 2 EXIST. THRU LNS + 1 NEW RT TURN LN), AND ADDITION OF WB LEFT TURN LN ONTO SB 1-215 ON RAMP (WID. FROM 3 TO 4 LNS - 2 THRU EXIST LNS, 1 LEFT TURN LN + 1 NEW LEFT TURN LANE) & SW INSTALL E/O OC. New project 2012 RTP ID 3M04WT014 Number of Projects 5 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM As of January 21, 2014 Page 30 of 32 ZE l0 4£ 96ed NV 6Z 44-b40Z/1Z/4 xslx"601;uauapuaLuV dlld E40Z £40Z/91/14 uo a;epdll d8H gad spund to 6upwei6aldab pue aseanu1;s00 "(9Z00099:#21d8H) 3AV 13NHVO 01 ONISS0d0d3A0 2i2idfl 1/10213 '(N01103dI0 HOV3 NI £) S3NV1 9 Ol Z W0213 Zia NOANVO NVIONI N301M :SJNlddS WIVd NI LZL066AI2J s6uudS wled £ lOZ/5 L/l 4 uo a;epd� d8H gad spund l0 6ulwwe�6alda2{ Z900100 "ON 300Id8 - 300de 3NV1-4 M3N V HlIM d3Ald 2i31VM311HM 1V ONINO V1SIA NO JNISS0d0 d31VM MO1 3NV1-ti ONIISIX3 30V1d3d :SJNIddS WIVd JO A110 3H1 NI 9017060Al2i s6uudS wled bL/ElA3 04 El/ZLAd wall spun; uo010 6ulwwel6oided + "(Cld SVN321V-13NNVHO 01SIdV8) 6-1 aS SONI2dS WIVd SN00'8 '(2110 V3 NI Nl 1 'SN1 Z HN3 dV0 `Cid 01S1dV8-Cld SVN3dV) Zia VSOW23H "1X3 `(Sl1V1S ">121Vd AV8 311S3d0 301A02d 01 ((dVO-NON) Od SVN3dV-AM NAO z_unaHVl) "2i0 VSOW213H N301M :ONI dWl "(21O VSOW2i3H'2 AM NANO ZlIno Vl d0 21311d00 3S) Wf13Sf1W 31N311V0 Vfl`JV 3H1210d '0Vd'2 S321f110f1211S 1NVNaldrlddV'8 ONDIdVd "H3A "NIVdC1 `AVMa21- SJNlddS 011Vd NI Z04060Al2i s6uudS wled £ lOZ/91./1l uo elepdn d8H _lad spund to 6L: wei6alda21 "(LZ00100 :# ddElF1) N011VZI13NNVH0 33A31 30 ONIISISN00 S1N31/0A0ddW1 30VNIVd0 JNIanioNI `3ec i8 3NV1-17M3N V H11M ONISS02i0 d31VM-M01 3NV1 .17 ONIISIX3 30V1d3d :13NNVHO 3JVNIVda H1f10S NOANVO SVN3dV 213A0 da NOANVO WIVd "S NO 90Z4EOAld s6uudS wled E40Z/94/44 uo a;epda d8H gad /(eia0 alnpayoS pue spund l0 6ulwwai6aldab "0 10Z/01.0Z Ad NI M/21 230d (=nun S1103d011018Z5"LZS) (Z910099 4t2i8) S31-10VOdddV 03d1f10321 11V'8 Sd301110HS /M 3AV SWVaV 013AV NO1ONIHSVM W02dd N33210 V131dIdnW daA0 WOO 300Id8 "1S VAvne 3NV1 Z MAN 1Of12i1SNOO - V13R12if1W NI 170ZI£0Ald elapirm £10Z/91./l4 uo elepdfl d8H Jed spund to 6ulwwe-160-1dod "(0900099'ON 3001d8)133d1S 3NV1 0/M'IW ZZ"O `HSVM 1VOS31A131 d3A0 3001d8 3NV-1 17 V H1IM 3901218 3NV1 Z "OH NOANVO 1VOS31A131 30V1d3d:ONIN301M/1N31/30V1d3d 30012i8 aH NOANVO 1VOS3W31-3dONIS13 3NV1 NI EOZ14 4AId wou1s13 eNel £40Z/51/41 ' elePdfl d8H gad spund to 6ulwwei6alda21 (0L00100'ON 300Id8 - d3Ald d31VM311HM )13NNVHO 2131VMW2i01S A311VA V113H0V00 3H1 d3A0 3OCIld8 3NV117 H11M ONISSOHO 2131VM MO1 3NVl-E 30V1d3d :Cid SWIVd 3Nna NO - V1NIf10 Vl JO A110 3H1 NI AiNf100 3aISH3Ald N2131SV3 NI ZOZ4ZLAN Blum el £LOZ/9L/L l uo a;epda d8H gad spund l0 6ulwwea6alda21 "39Old8 3H1 JO 3018 HOV3 NO >11VM301S ld 9 ONIOf11ONI `(9900100 "ON 3001219) 3J0R18 3NV1 anod V H11M 13NNVHO d31VMW2101S A311VA V1131-10V00 3H1 d3A0 ONISS0d0 d31VM MO1 3NV1 OMl bti 3f1N3AV ONIISIX3 30V1d3d :1N3W3OVld3d 30a1218 i V 3AV - OIONI JO A_LIO 3H1 NI ZOZ4 4 4AI21 01Pu1 £40Z/51/11 u0 alePdfl d8H gad spund l0 6ulwwe�6aldad -S1213A1f1O aNV ONI -X H31VM MO1 JO 1VA0Ved ONV N0110310dd HnoaS 13NNVHO `SAVM3AId0/1VNOIS 0133V21110f1d1SN003d `S>11VM301S `SlIVd1/S3NV1 3N18 30MONl S1N3W3A0ddW1 d3H10 "N01103Sd31N1 S98-dS 011IV2113H0VdV 0/M 13-00E W021d 3901d8 (dICI V3 NI SNl-E) N1-9 V HAM (9900100 "ON 3001d8) ONI-X d31VM MO1 Nl-Z V dO 1N31A130V1d3d :13NNVHO 2131VMW2iO1S V113H0V00 d3A0 OS 3AV - V113H0V00 dO A110 3H1 NI 5Z8011AR1 ellayoeo^ EIOZ/54/l1 uo a;epd0 d8H gad (elan alnpayoS pue spund l0 6ulwww6aldaa "(69 L0099 'ON 30012:18)103f021d 3H1 d0 301S 1SV3 3E11 ONO1V N1VM3aIS ONV NVI03W 03SIVN V d0 N0110f1d1SN00 3H1 ONIOf11ON1 `0-linos 3H1 01 "021 Z3d3d 0NV FIldON 3H1 01 V0Vd1S3 VIA) 30ClId8 3H10/N ld 09Z 01 3001d8 3E110/S ld 09£ "XOdddV W02id `(dICI V3 NI SNl £) SNl 9 0117 W021d HO WIVd 31V0 d0 ONIN301M:d3Ald d31VM311HM 3H1213A0 Zia 1A11Vd 31V0 - A311VA V113H0V00 3H1 NI ktNnoo 3OISd3Ald Nd31SV3 NI L 1.01.60ARi Ain lelpay;e0 uoseaj alepdn el411 pl;oafwd Aoua6y £ 60Z `0£ '300 gemudde oVOS �.,..r...�,wa.)pow, r £60Z �agwaaaa 91, •oN uogeagipow angeilsluluapd - dlld £60Z RCTC 2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 16 rr 11111100w December 2013 t' SCAG approval: Dec. 30, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason RCTC RIV130402 THROUGHOUT EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION. Cost Increase from $4,886 to $5,404 per commission action Grouped Project Listing SI # 17(d) RCTC RIV120101 RCTC COMMUTER RAIL SYSTEMATIC IMP. OF FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT: REHAB OF RCTC'S COMM. RAIL IN COORDINATION W/METROLINK, INCLUDING REHAB OF TRACK, SIGNALS, COMMUNICATION, MECHANICAL & LAYOVER FACILITIES, ROLLING STOCK (LOCOMOTIVES/PASSENGER RAIL CARS), DEV. OF PTC IN SO. CA., AND IMPROVEMENTS, EXPANSION, AND REHAB OF METROLINK STATION PARKING AND FACILITIES ($2,073.40 TC FOR 20% MATCH IN FY 13/14) New project in 2013 FTIP. RCTC RIV520111 REGIONAL RIDESHARE - CONTINUING PROGRAM ($309.69 IN TOLL CREDITS UTILIZED TO MATCH CMAQ IN CONS). Reprogramming of Con Funds from FY13/14 to FY 12/13 due to programming capacity issues Riverside County RIV111003 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY - MARKET STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT: REPLACE THE EXISTING TWO LANE (ONE LANE IN EACH DIRECTION) MARKET STREET BRIDGE OVER THE SANTA ANA RIVER, 0.4 MILES NORTHWEST OF SR60 WITH A FOUR LANE (TWO LANES IN EACH DIRECTION) BRIDGE. BRIDGE NO. 56C0024 Reprogramming of Funds per HBP Update on 11/15/2013 Riverside County RIV121203 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY - ON AVE 56/AIRPORT DR, REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER WHITEWATER RIVER .21 MILES E/O HWY 111 (BRIDGE NO.56C0020). Reprogramming of Funds per HBP Update on 11/15/2013 Riverside County RIV121204 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF NORCO - ON HAMNER AVE OVER SANTA ANA RIVER .5 MILES N/O OF SIXTH STREET, REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 6 LANE BRIDGE (BRIDGE NO.56C0446). Reprogramming of Funds per HBP Update on 11/15/2013 Riverside County RIV050534 AT I-215/NEWPORT RD IC: RECONSTRUCT/WIDEN FROM 4 TO 6 THROUGH LANES BETWEEN HAUN RD AND ANTELOPE RD, RELOCATE NB AND SB EXIT RAMPS (3 LANES), RECONFIGURE NB & SB ENTRY RAMPS TO INCLUDE HOV LANE, ADD NEW NB AND SB LOOP ENTRY RAMPS (2 LANES), INCLUDE EXTENDED RAMP ACCELERATION/DECELERATION LANES, ADD EXTENDED DEDICATED RIGHT -TURN LANES (EA: 0J440). Cost decrease based on current engineer's estimate. STPL funds added to project, per /multi -funding call for projects scoring. Completion date change from 2015 to 2016 - model year remains 2018. STPL obligation will utilize EPSP to obligate funding in FY 2013/14. Riverside Transit Agency RIV120827 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE FOR FY 12-13 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB, TEM/MURR/MEN). Reprogramming of Con Funds from FY 2012/2013 to FY 2013/2014 per agency and SCAG's request. TEMECULA RIV62029 AT HWY 79 SO AND LA PAZ ST: ACQUIRE LAND, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT PARK -AND -RIDE LOT - 157 SPACES. Reprogramming of funds to add CMAQ and reduce CITY Funds due to RCTC's 2013 Call for projects. Technical change to change SR-79 from State Highway to Local Highway due to relinquishment of SR-79 to city of Temecula per CTC action on January 19-20, 2005. Number of Projects 19 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM As of January 21, 2014 Page 32 of 32 AGENDA ITEM 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: January 27, 2014 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager Eric DeHate, Staff Analyst SUBJECT: 2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Update and STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: RCTC staff would first like to thank the Technical Advisory Committee Primary and Alternates for providing the necessary information for the 2015 FTIP Update; the amendment was submitted to SCAG by the established deadline of January 3, 2014. The 2015 Update included 382 projects. The Table below summarizes the four main categories of projects included in the 2015 FTIP Update. The new projects from the 2013 Multi -Funding Call for Projects, approved by Commission on January 8, 2014 and the previously approved 2013 Pavement Rehabilitation STP funding were incorporated into the update. Other major changes included Caltrans HBP updates of November 15, 2013: 2015 FTIP Update Summary Local Highway Projects State Highway Projects Transit Projects Totals Carry Over Projects with changes 93 45 111 249 Completed Projects 13 20 49 82 Deleted Projects 5 3 2 10 New Projects 19 5 17 41 Totals 130 73 179 382 Also included in the 2015 FTIP Update, are old and new Transportation Control Measures (attached). As you may be aware, Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) are specific transportation projects and programs committed to help improve air quality, regardless of the source of funding. Riverside County is included in three Air Basins, but the only Air Basin that currently includes TCMs is the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). Since Western Riverside County is in the SCAB basin, it's the only portion currently that has TCMs. Within the SCAB region, TCM's are divided into three major categories: • Transit and non -motorized modes; • HOV Lanes and their pricing alternatives; and • Information -based strategies All of these TCMs require timely implementation. Please review your TCM's schedule and deliver your project by the expected completion date. TCMs are reported for an FTIP update or RTP update to SCAG and have to be delivered by its completion date. Failure to deliver the project by the completion date may jeopardize conformity for the entire SCAG region. If conformity is lost for the region, all federal funding for the region is also halted. Please do not take this lightly. TCMs account for approximately $2.1 billion dollars in Riverside County and failure to deliver these projects would have an adverse effect on the $5.6 billion currently programmed in the 2015 FTIP. Attachment: 2015 FTIP — Transportation Control Measure's Project Category DRAFT 2015 FTIP - Transportation Control Measure's Project Category FTIP ID Lead Agency Project Title TCM Program Year* Total Project Cost (in 000's) Project Status Completion Date RIV041030 Riverside Transit Agency Hemet Transit Facility FFY 09/10 1,442 PA&ED 12/31/2015 RIV050553 Riverside Transit Agency Temecula-Murrieta Transit Center FFY 08/09 9,135 Pre PA&ED 12/31/2015 RIV071240 Moreno Valley Cactus Ave Widening and Signal Synchronization FFY 12/13 3,500 Construction 2/28/2015 RIV071250 RCTC SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project FFY 12/13 1,311,660 Design Build 9/4/2017 RIV071267 RCTC 1-15 Corridor Improvement Project FFY 14/15 433,000 PA&ED 12/31/2020 RIV090609 Riverside Transit Agency Advance Traveler Information Systems FFY 09/10 740 Design 12/31/2015 RIV110914 RCTC for Indian Health Inc. Mini -Van Expansion FFY 10/11 220 Purchasing Vehicles 12/31/2014 As of 1/14/2014 DRAFT 2015 MP - Transportation Control Measure's Project Category FTIP ID Lead Agency Project Title TCM Program Year* Total Project Cost (in 000's) Project Status Completion Date RIV111207 RCTC Western Riverside County Park N Ride Facilities FFY 12/13 690 Ongoing 12/31/2018 RIV151201 Eastvale Hamner Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization of six signalized intersections FFY 14/15 384 Pre PA&ED 12/31/2015 RIV151202 Moreno Valley Traffic Management Center and Traffic Signal Synchronization of 45 signalized intersections FFY 15/16 2,400 Pre PA&ED 12/31/2016 RIV151205 Riverside Traffic Signal Sychronization of 49 signalized intersections FFY 15/16 1,857 Pre PA&ED 12/31/2016 RIV151207 Riverside 4.3 mile Pedestrian Walking Path adjacent to Santa Ana Bicycle Trail FFY 15/16 3,250 Pre PA&ED 12/31/2018 RIV151209 Riverside Bicycle Share Program in downtown Riverside and UCR locations FFY 14/15 303 Pre PA&ED 12/31/2015 RIV151210 Riverside County 7.2 mile Salt Creek Mult- i , Modal Trail from Canyon Lake to Menifee to Hemet FFY 15/16 1 6,405 Pre PA&ED 12/31/2020 As of 1/14/2014 DRAFT 2015 FTIP - Transportation Control Measure's Project Category FTIP ID Lead Agency Project Title TCM Program Year* Total Project Cost (in 000's) Project Status Completion Date RIV151211 Riverside Transit Agency Limited Stop Service From UCR to the Galleria at Tyler FFY 15/16 12,283 Pre PA&ED 12/31/2020 RIV151213 Wildomar Grand Ave Phase I Bicycle Lanes from Clinton Keith Rd to David Brown Middle School FFY 14/15 951 Pre PA&ED 12/31/2015 RIV151214 Wildomar Grand Ave Phase II Bicycle Lanes from Corydon Rd to David Brown Middle School FFY 15/16 1,019 Pre PA&ED 12/31/2016 RIV151215 Riverside Bruce Street Pedestrian Sidewalks from Adair Ave to Lake Street FFY 14/15 403 Pre PA&ED 12/31/2016 RIV520109 RCTC Perris Vatley Line FFY 08/09 248,251 Construction 12/31/2015 RIV520111 RCTC Western Riverside County Regional Rideshare FFY 04/05 12,857 Ongoing 6/30/2018 2,050,750 * TCM Program Year includes carry over projects from prior FTIP's As of 1/14/2014 AGENDA ITEM 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: January 27, 2014 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager SUBJECT: Draft Federal Fiscal Year 2013/14 Obligation Plan STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21), just like SAFETEA-LU continues to allocate federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funding to the states; the states in turn sub -allocate funding to the regions (or counties) based on the specific funding distribution for each fund source. In Riverside County, the Commission is responsible for the administration of the STP and CMAQ funding. Each year, we ask for your assistance by providing us with your project delivery schedules that allow us to prepare the Riverside County Federal STP and CMAQ Delivery Plan. The plan that we prepare provides critical information to the Commission and allows us to develop contingency plans, such as loans between regions or project substitution, based on the target amount of federal funds that needs to be obligated during the fiscal year. Likewise, the plan allows Caltrans to monitor the rate of obligations and develop contingency plans for use of any funds that may not be obligated at a statewide level. The expectation is for each region to obligate 100% of its STP and CMAQ allocations or Obligation Authority (OA). With your assistance, as a region, Riverside County obligated 88.9% in FY 2012/13. As a region, we have until April 1st of each year to obligate our annual OA target, after which the OA becomes available for use by other regions within the state. If the state as a whole does not use all of the OA, then the unobligated balance will return to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for redistribution to other states that have obligated 100% of the OA. This is an opportunity that allows states to obligate more federal funding than initially received. This is referred to as the "August Redistribution." For the FFY 2012/13, California received an additional $58 million in "August Redistribution," the 14th consecutive year that California obligates 100% of its OA (see attached FFY 2012-13 OA report). While we realize that some projects experience schedule delays because of issues such as environmental or right of way certification requirements, staff encourages agencies to obligate as early as possible. This increases the likelihood that there will be OA available for the project in the current fiscal year and may even bring more OA for Riverside County agencies than originally anticipated. The draft FFY 2013/14 Obligation Plan presented reflects the schedules provided by the local agencies through the 2015 FTIP Update and the recently submitted Multi -Funding Call for Projects. These schedules have been incorporated in the January 2014 Project Milestone Reports and are available for input/update until February 14tn As always, we appreciate your collaboration in this process. Attachments: Caltrans FFY 2012/13 Obligation Delivery Report Draft 2013/14 Obligation Plan $TATF. OF CALIFORNIA—CALIFORNIA STATE.. TRANSPORT ATION AGENCY _iDMUND G. BROWN Jr.. Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF LOCAL ASSISTANCE 1120 N Street, MS-1 P.O. 130X 942873 SACRAMENTO, CA 94273-0001 PHONE (916) 653-1776 FAX (916) 654-2409 rrY 711 www.dot.ca.gov October 17, 2013 To: Caltrans' Local Partners Dear Executive Directors: Rex your power! Be energy efficient! Congratulations on delivering 100 percent of the federal fiscal year (FFY) 2013 obligation authority (OA), including $58 million in additional local OA made available via the August Redistribution. Through one of the largest and strongest partnerships of local, regional, State and federal governments, California citizens are receiving needed transportation improvements including transit, local streets, bicycle, and highway projects. pproximately $1.2 billion of formula federal -aid OA was obligated to fund projects. This s the 14th consecutive year regions and local agencies have achieved 100 percent delivery of avai able OA I look forward to continuing this partnership in FFY 2014 and again delivering 100 percent of our OA. To meet that goal, it is important for the regions to submit obligation plans to the Division of Local Assistance (DLA) by April 1, 2014. This will help us review, prioritize and track projects, and plan the workload for the remaining FFY 2014 OA. The annual notification for the provisions of Assembly Bill 1012 "Use It or Lose It" including the current template for the obligation plans, will be sent to the regions and available on the DLA web site by November 15, 2013. To ensure your projects arc delivered, we encourage you to submit your request for authorizations (RFAs) as soon as possible this FFY. Please bear in mind that the annual release of OA to the local OA pool will be May 1, 2014, per the OA Management Policy. After this date, the formula OA will be first come, first serve until gone. In addition, to allow time for the Federal Highway Administration to review and approve requests for funding, RFAs will need to be submitted to Caltrans by July 1, 2014. To ensure full use of all transportation funds as soon as possible, our local partners are encouraged to: 1. Deliver all projects programmed in the current year of the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). 2. Advance projects from the outer years of the FTIP using Expedited Project Selection Procedure. 3. Work with your local Caltrans District Director to determine if additional State highway "Caltrans improves mobility across California" Caltran's Local Partners October 17, 2013 Page 2 projects could be recipients of these funds. 4. Fund all federal projects at the maximum participation rate. Despite the challenges in delivering transportation projects, I am confident our continued partnership will allow us to meet our delivery goals again this year. If you have any questions, please call Tony Prandini at (916) 653-7200 or Peggy Siu at (916) 651-6875. Sincerely, L Z� RIHUI ZHANG Acting Chief Division of Local Assistance c: District Deputy Directors for Local Assistance, Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineers, Caltrans Office Chiefs, Division of Local Assistance, Caltrans Fardad Falakfarsa, Division of Budgets, Caltrans "Caltrans improves mobility across California" E I-OZ '9 JagwanoN seJold uyor Rq paiedeJd (£00' 8SZ'b L ) %9 SO L LZ£'Z6L'L9Z' L 989'6E17'00Z' L sasodhnd ieuopewJo;u io; pafeidsyp e;ep ieaX loud (le;o_L) (Z Lints) a1A suowbvio Vo einwioj ZLOZ Add (8ZS'Z8S'8) 999'96[LS %S 90L ZLE'bLL'89Z'L 68L'96E'ZOZ'L 166Z'E (66Z'£) I (009'6Z£'LL) 9 (£0089Z'bL) 00'Z69£86'LZZ'L 1V101 6 LO'889'L4 %4 LZ 98S'ZS6'ZL 40904909 - 998' L94'04 00 64C8L0'0Z S12dS 69Z'40L'L8L %60Z L6L'985'64 994'06Z'LEZ I OE4' l99'4L L 00'9£0'6ZL'Z9 Llaws (989 L9Z'6L) £L9'440.9L %OZSL 009549'8LZ Z04'E£E'68L I (090'Z9E'66) 00'Z94'969'Z8Z d9H (LEZ'L09'490 Z40'L9L'L4 %98ZL 066'68SLZ6 9LL`LEZ'12L 166Z`£ (66Z'E) 1 (OOS'6Z£'L.0 (6£Z'6L6'6ZL) OO SS4'084'Z98 S31ONESV 1V001 1V101 009'0ZL %L b6 ££Z'606 ZL ££8'6Z9'EL 1 d. (Z80'0LL) 648'6Z9 00 990'0 L L'£ L 0sagunoO le�na LSL'86b L00'069 Z9£'££b Z LL'8Z8 099`98 L'Z LSL L9£'L E6L'8L4 (9ZE'090' L) LS6`6Z9`4 Z08'£08 LZ9'4 Z (ZZ9'9E L'4) £6£'£S t 0 L Z' 9ZS Z 908' S L L' Z (ZE0 `644'4 L) (L8L'L98`09) (LPL 'EZ9'0E) (6Z9' 680'4 L ) (E8L'8L) (£99'Z04'Z) OL9'99VOL /� (Z4Z'SOZ'ZE) (SSZ`69L) 49L'996 069'L46'Z %S £9 %6 L9 %4'E8 %L 8L %0'£ L %4 ES %9'8S %4'40 L %9'L9 %L'ZL 6L8'898 6EL' OZ L' L 006' LL L `Z EEL'£8 L 686'SZE L06199' L 964'9L9 sL8'S0Z'OE LZ9'949'6 66l'44 L' Z 9£9'L9E' L ()Pt() L8' L £SZ' L L9'Z 944' Z L 0' L 6E9' L LSZ 899 9E6'Z 68Z'SSL`L LL8'0£6'8Z 489'9LZ'4 L L 00' 846' Z L6Z'LE8 %Z'LLL L96'ZL4'LI- 8E0`6E4'9 %L 96 E04'96£'E L6L'849'E %869 LLL'Z48'S L8E`L9£'8 %9'E9 S4E'EOL'E 09L'6L8'9 049'4Z6'Z %OOL+ 6ZSZLZ'EL 0, (ZVI.`L91-'4) 49L'46Z'OL %46EZ 8L6'ZL0'90L LZO'L98'E4 994'86L'9 %9'64£ 9Z9'8L9'L9 EZO'LSC41. E68' LS8'Z %S LOZ 966'LOL'Z£ s SL4'99L'9L L46'SL %817LL L8£'9EL ZS9'049 EZ£'984 %£ 80L L69Z£81£ 9LL'E46'4£ - %6'88 L4L'08£'1.8 s L9L'949'L6 889'8L9'9 %OELZ £84`L66'ZL 1799'L9Z'4E ZLL'SSL %Z'61.L OL6'4£L'S EL6'608'4 %6 L8 996'066'9 0, 60L'L96'L %l'9£ L8£' I-99' L LLO'E09`17 (66Z'E) I (949'9 0 (LZS'4l) (406'SZ) (LSC4) (SLL'S4) (4S6' L L) (066'6) (ZSL'E£Z) (80 L `S£ L ) (69L' Z L ) 00' L8Z'48£' L Leweyal L80'0Z9 OO 4L L'90Z' L Lauwnlonl Z6E'464 00'49L'Z4L'Z LepeneN 940'LZ9 00'98L'96E LesodueW (60Z'6L8) 00ZZS'9E4'E ,leuadwl 909'Z96L L88'6££ L06'9L9'LL LOL`9L9'E 909'E L6' L OO L00'986 00 86E`SZ8 OO LZL'849'LL 00'1789`S6L' 0 L 00'99 L'L40' L LseJenele0 Liopewy eJnluan eJelnl aoyel (ELL'ZLL) (SLL'SS£'9) OOSZ80L6'ZL snelsluelg (4£b'04) (448'04) 00'17L0'0£9'£ znu0 ewes 1 (£Z£`99) 4ES'069'Z °OILLZb8'S aleqpe8 ewes (OZL'OL) (6L6'E) 00'6b8'£68'9 odslgo sml ueS (ZSL'OEZ) (909'0LE'LZ) 00'9L9`8LZ'LL 0, wnbeo( ueS I (09E'ZL6' l) (999'OLZ'ZOL) 00 E40'40L'84L (01W) eaay Ae9 d S (E08'8L8) (SL£'64E'OS) 00'L4L`S86'S9 o6alO ueg (E06'9L9) (09Z'Z£L'LZ) 001E9'9L9'L9 9oulpJewa8 ueS I (LL9'8) (mini.) 00'649'E9L ol!uasueS (8ZL'£69) (966'8Z4'9L) 00'048'S90'ZS (000VS) oluawe�oeg (LLS'6ZL) 890'Z64'6Z 00 40Z'48L'4S 9apls�anlb (£96'0L0'L) (9L0'8L9'04) 00'ZZ9'968'9L a6uel0 (L96'E9) (LLL'498) 0090L'8EL'9 Awaluon • (LSL'8L) 94L'ZL8'L 00'0ZL'4ZE'9 0, peoJaW (L60'94) 844`I-Z6 00'9ZL'LZL`E eJepeW (9L81Z4'£9) LZ9' £E L 6L0' E9 L'6 (Z99'89 L'Z) 60Z'8S8 S9£'4L8'0L Ob6'8£b %9'0Z L %E'96 %8'49 %Z'60 L %8 L8 8L8' L64'9LE 844'8S4`E ZEE' Z88' 9 L SLE'L88'0£ 9L4'648'E 869'64ZZ LE SLO'Z6S'E ZL4'S40`9Z EL8'6LZ`8Z SZ9'LOL'4 • 66Z'E 1 (90Z'Z6Z'£) (44L'94) (645'99Z) (L84ZLE) ( L 94' Z9) Z8E' LL L'89 (84£'64 L) L4E'SZO'L LE9'8 L L'9 (Z9L'9b£) OO EZZ'L9£'L4Z OO L9L'88L'£ 00 £ L 9'9LZ'6l 00'8 LL'EL4'EZ 00 848' 9 L L' S sele6uy sol s6uN weN ousaid aAng sVO 999'96L'LS paianllaa £L/OE/610 se ey0 : lasgoBupund 6 EL/ZLOZ Add : duawlsnfpy 6A.lanllaaJapu0 ,y0 lenloy Luognquls!pay VO suolle6pg0 lenloV I luawssassy wewssessy I 4y6!siano -.1an° ZLOZ Add ELOZ AAA ELOZ Add lsn6ny lenlab' £LOZ Add ELOZ Add `• spaaN 211'91 sPaaN H'891 `• £LOZ Add .104 VO £LOZ Add IenPV eouele9 ELOZ Add luaaad palsnfpy col uo!lnquluo0 . of weLuTsnfpy uo!6ab ELOZ `0£ Jegwevies Jo se spun] VO elnwuod tianJaa eoue;slssy leool £ L - Z LOZ AAA FFY 2012-13 Local Assistance Delivery Formula OA Funds as of September 30, 2013 Information: < This September 30, 2013 report is based on the Department's Federal Aid Data System (FADS) transactions. < Obligations include obligations, deobligations, exchanges, and Federal Transit Administration transfers (FTAs). Footnotes: The Locals' FFY 2012-13 Actual OA and August Redistribution amounts are based on the amounts provided by the Department's Federal Resources Office (FRO) on October 18, 2013. Actual Local OA is $1,227,983,692 with adjustments to/for: 1. Remove Local Rail OA from FRO base Loral OA (-$7,260,530); FRO retains all Rail OA and apportionments, 2. FHWA Prior Year retum (Local share =-$1,496,425), 3. FHWA Adjustment to Formula Limit (Local Share = +$4,547,663), and 4. FHWA Adjustment for Other Allocated Limit (Local Share = +$7,975,398). Also, an additional $57,795,655 of OA provided from FHWA via the August Redistribution process. 2 Balance of FFY 2012 OA (last FFY's OA balance) — This is the amount a Region/Program must pay back if it over delivered or the amount a Region/Program will receive to "make whole" if under delivered based on the Division of Local Assistance's (DLA's) OA Management Policy. Amounts shown in parenthesis are amounts owed and positive (non -parenthesis numbers) amounts are to be repaid to Regions/Programs. 3 Required by Sections 182.6(n) and 182.7(k) of the California Streets and Highways Code. This oversight amount has been revised with the September 30, 2013 OA report to: 1) base the calculation on the FFY 2013 revised advance apportionments dated February 22, 2013, and 2) to lower the total amount by $250 to $11,329,500. " This is the FFY 2013 adjusted actual base OA, which includes adjustments for FFY 2012 OA Over or Under Delivery, the Oversight Adjustment, and contribution for the LS&R Needs Assessment. 5 Balance of FFY 2013 actual OA per date of report — This is the balance of FFY 2013 OA at the close of the FFY and this is the amount a Region/Program must pay back if over delivered or the amount a Region/Program will receive to "make whole" if under delivered based on DLA's OA Management Policy. Amounts shown in parentheses are amounts owed back and positive (non -parentheses) amounts are amounts owed to those Regions/Programs. 6 Per the August 1, 2006 MOU between Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and the San Bemardino Associated Govemments (SANBAG), the FFY 2006 OA for these two regions was adjusted in September 2006 to reflect an OA loan of $16,000,000. The loan decreased RCTC's FFY 2006 OA and increased SANBAG's FFY 2006 OA by $16,000,000. The August 1, 2006 memo states that the repayment of the OA to RCTC from SANBAG is anticipated in FFY 2009 or FFY 2010. Upon direction from these Regions, repayment was applied in FFY 2012 (50% - applied October 2011) and FFY 2013 (50% - applied October 2012). ▪ The Rural Counties' subtotal above excludes those rural counties receiving CMAQ beginning in FFY 2006. This amount now includes Tehama as of the May 31, 2013 report per Caltrans' Division of Transportation Programming's revised Advance apportionments dated February 22, 2013. e Based on the September 30, 2012 (FFY 2012) year-end reconciliation (please see September 30, 2012, OA delivery report for details on this amount). This results in an adjustment to the Locals' OA for this FFY (FFY 2013). This amount reduces the Locals' OA balance. 9 Received agreements from Region(s) for the Local Streets and Roads (LS&R) Statewide Needs Assessment Funding Concurrence. 10 June 27, 2013 Letter of Understanding between San Joaquin Council of Govemments (SJCOG) and Merced County Association of Govemments (MCAG) to transfer $101,000 of CMAQ apportionments and OA in FFY 2013 from MCAG to SJCOG to support the rideshare project. Prepared by John Flores November 5, 2013 As of 1/16/2014 DRAFT FFY 2013/2014 OBLIGATION PLAN R\iT\r z Com y Iransponoton Cornmasion Agency FTIP ID Project Location Project Scope/Description RFA Subm. To Caltrans D-8 CMAQ STP-L Funding Phase Project Phase FTIP FY 2013/14 Comments Indio 47520 I-10/Jefferson IC Project $14,499,925 Con ROW Y May use EPSP Corona RIV041047 Magnolia & El Camino Ave TE project 7/1/2014 $943,000 Con ROW Y Riverside County RIV050534 I-215/Newport Blvd IC Project $14,625,000 Con ROW Y May use EPSP Beaumont RIV050535 SR60/Potrero Blvd. Interchange Ph.I IC Project 8/15/2013 $8,929,000 Con ROW Y Calimesa RIV060116 I-10/Cherry Valley IC PA&ED $443,000 Eng Eng Y May use EPSP Palm Desert RIV071243 Free rt - Fred Waring/111 Reconfigure Right Turn 8/15/2013 $531,000 Con ROW Y Palm Springs RIV071258 Traffic Management Ctr TMC 5/17/2013 51,644,000 Con PA&ED Y Riverside County RIV071288 Ave 66 GS Grade Separation 12/1/2013 $350,000 Eng PA&ED Y Moreno Valley RIV080904 SR60/Theodore St IC PA&ED $964,000 Eng Eng Y Palm Springs RIV091205 Farrell Dr RT Ln @ Vista Chino Intersection Improvements 5/24/2013 $369,000 Con PA&ED Y Riverside RIV110116 Quiet Zone X-ing Imp Crossing improvements 8/1/2013 $7,000,000 Con PS&E Y Caltrans RIV110122 1-215 SB Connector 3rd MFL and Aux Lanes $1,225,000 Riverside County RIV110302 1-10 in the City of Blythe New W/B on and off ramps $810,000 Con PS&E Y Banning RIV130401 Ramsey St. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $182,000 Con Y Beaumont RIV130401 8th Street Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Pavement Rehab $220,000 Con Y Calimesa RIV130401 Calimesa and Avenue L Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 554,000 Con Y Corona RIV130401 Ontario Ave Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $832,000 Con Y Eastvale RIV130401 Schleisman Ave. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $199,000 Con Y Hemet RIV130401 Gilbert St. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $443,000 Con Y Jurupa Valley RIV130401 Van Buren Blvd. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $387,000 Con Y Lake Elsinore RIV130401 Gunnerson St. Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehab $286,000 Con Y Moreno Valley RIV130401 Frederick St. and Elsworth St. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $1,084,000 Con Y Murrieta RIV130401 Jefferson Ave. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $593,000 Con Y Norco RIV130401 Pavement Overlay - Various Locations Pavement Rehab $178,000 Con Y Riverside RIV130401 Indiana Ave. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $1,810,000 Con Y Riverside County RIV130401 Rancho California Rd. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $2,634,000 Con Y San Jacinto RIV130401 San Jacinto Ave Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $290,000 Con Y Temecula RIV130401 Winchester Rd. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $646,000 Con Y Wildomar RIV130401 Clinton Keith Rd Slurry Seal Pavement Rehab $136,000 Con Y Blythe RIV130402 N. Broadway Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $150,000 Con Y Cathedral City RIV130402 East Palm Canyon Dr. Rehab Pavement Rehab $337,000 Con Y Coachella RIV130402 Grapefruit Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation/Reconstruction Pavement Rehab $215,000 Con Y Desert Hot Springs RIV130402 Hacienda Ave & Mission Lakes Blvd. Surface Rehab Pavement Rehab $182,000 Con Y indian Wells RIV130402 Cook Street Rubberized Overlay Pavement Rehab $135,000 Con Y Indio RIV130402 Old Hwy 111 Pavement Reconstruction Pavement Rehab $477,000 Con Y La Quinta RIV130402 Washington St. Improvements Pavement Rehab $250,000 Con Y Palm Desert RIV130402 Portola Ave. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $336,000 Con Y Palm Springs RIV130402 Ramon Rd. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $396,000 Con Y Rancho Mirage RIV130402 Old Hwy 111 Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $162,000 Con Y Riverside County RIV130402 62nd Street Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab $605,000 Con Y 1 As of 1/16/2014 Agency FTIP ID Project Location Project Scope/Description RFA Subm. To Caltrans D-8 CMAQ STP-L Funding Phase Project Phase FTIP FY 2013/14 Comments Riverside RIV131202 Adams St at 91 IC PA&ED $935,000 Eng Y May use EPSP Moreno Valley RIV151204 Aqueduct Trail Missing Segments PA&ED $340,000 Eng Y May use EPSP Wildomar RIV151213 Grand Ave Bike Lanes Bike Lanes $614,000 Con Y May use EPSP Temecula RIV62029 Park and Ride Facility Park and Ride Facility $1,301,000 Con Y May use EPSP EllPending Obligation Need Additional Information RFA to be submitted to Caltrans $5,592,000 $63,149,925 2 AGENDA ITEM 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: January 27, 2014 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director SUBJECT: 2013 Multi -Funding Call for Projects Approval STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On January 8, 2014, the Commission unanimously approved staff and the TAC recommendations for the Multi -Funding Call for Projects that included Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality, Surface Transportation Program (STP), as well as Measure A regional Arterial for the Western County. The infusion of federal and Measure A funds into our recovering economy is $164.5 million for state highway, regional arterials, air quality programs/projects. The next steps will include incorporating the funding into the 2013 FTIP (ongoing), preparing the Memorandums of Understandings between RCTC and the local agencies for project delivery and establishing the policy for project savings. In the upcoming months, staff will be contacting you to provide updates on the 2013 FTIP as well as providing guidance through the federal aid process to obligate the funding (as needed). The new funding sources from this Call for Projects will be incorporated into the 2013 FTIP through the upcoming formal amendment No. 17, due to SCAG on February 25 or the Administrative Modification No. 18, due to SCAG on April 29. Anticipated approval of Amendment No. 17 is end of April 2014 and mid to late May for Administrative Modification No. 18. The success of this call for projects will shape up the process for upcoming call for projects, including the project delivery records for future agency scoring. Staff on a regular basis will monitor the progress of the projects through the FundTrack Project Milestone Reports. Thanks for all your participation and support. Attachment: 2013 Multi -Funding Call for Projects Results 2013 MULTI -FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS DRAFT Lead Agency/Applicant Project Title Funding Requested Agency match Agency match % TCC TPC (all phases) FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 Start Cons 1(mo/yr) FTIP INCLUSION Calimesa I-10/Cherry Valley IC Improvements (PA&ED) $443,000 $57,000 11.40% 2,000,000 2,000,000 443,000 Jan. 2014 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP Eastvale Hamner Ave Traffic Synchronization from Schleisman Rd to Eastvale Gateway $216,775 $116,725 35.00% 333,500 383,300 216,775 Feb. 2015 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP Moreno Valley Transportation Management Center - Ph IB $2,031,700 $268,300 11.67% 2,300,000 2,400,000 2,031,700 Jan. 2015 2013 FTIP-A17 AND 2015 FTIP Moreno Valley Dynamic Traveler Alert Message Boards $340,500 $44,500 11.57% 384,500 450,000 340,500 Jan. 2015 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP Moreno Valley Aqueduct Trail - Eucalyptus Ave to Lake Perris State Recreational Area $340,000 $85,000 20.00% 425,000 425,000 340,000 Jan. 2014 2013 FTIP -A17 AND 2015 FTIP Riverside Magnolia Ave. Signal Interconnect $1,387,500 $462,500 25.00% 1,850,000 1,855,500 1,387,500 June-15 2013 FTIP-A17 AND 2015 FTIP Riverside Riverside Metrolink Station and Metrolink Downtown Crossing SR91(PA&ED) $637,500 $112,500 15.00% 750,000 750,000 637,500 Feb. 2014 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP Riverside Santa Ana River Trail Walking Path $2,376,000 $594,000 20.00% 2,970,000 3,250,000 2,376,000 Sep. 2015 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP Riverside Santa Ana River Bicycle Trail $141,450 $47,150 25.00% 188,600 223,600 141,450 Sep. 2015 2013 FTIP-A17 AND 2015 FTIP AS OF 12/06/2013 CMAQ PROJECTS 2013 MULTI -FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS DRAFT Lead Agency/Applicant Project Title Funding Requested Agency match Agency match % TCC TPC (all phases) FY 2013/14 FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 Start Cons (mo/yr) FTIP INCLUSION Riverside Bicycle Share Program $240,000 $60,000 22.69% 264,450 300,000 9,480 230,520 Feb. 2014, Sept 2014, and Feb. 2015 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP Riverside Riverside County Bruce Street Sidewalk Improvements - Adair Ave. to Lake St. $195,000 $195,000 50.00% 390,000 402,500 195,000 June-15 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP Salt Creek Parkway $5,090,000 $892,000 14.91% 5,982,000 6,405,000 5,090,000 May-15 2013 FTIP-A17 AND 2015 FTIP RTA RapidLink Service along University and Magnolia $9,211,800 $3,070,600 25.00% 12,282,400 12,282,400 9,211,800 Jan. 2014 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP RTA Installation of a system -wide Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) for Transit $4,125,000 $1,375,000 25.00% 5,500,000 5,500,000 4,125,000 May-14 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP Temecita Temecula Park and Ride $1,300,750 $698,250 34.93% 1,999,000 2,365,000 1,300,750 Sep. 2014 2013 FTIP - A16 AND 2015 FTIP Wildomar Grand Ave & Clinton Keith Rd. Bike Paths $613,800 $204,600 25.00% 818,400 949,500 613,800 Feb. 2015 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP Wildomar Grand Ave Bike Paths - Corydon Rd to Brown Middle School. $746,640 $131,760 15.00% 878,400 1,019,100 746,640 IFeb. 2016 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP $29,437,415 $977,500 $3,976,475 $2,376,000 $0: *Based on programming capacity as of Administrative Modification No.16 AS OF 12/06/2013 CMAQ PROJECTS S.031-021d OVVO £TOZ/90/ZT d0 SV SIVL£Z'9S$ 000'008'9Z $ 000'008`9Z $ 'I dlIJ STOZ ONV LTV - dlld £TOZ 9TOZ/T/L 000'008`9Z $ 000'Z8Z'ITT $ 000'VVL'96 $ %0£'ZL 0007176'69 $ 000'008'9Z $ Neal llggeb per lo;saM saw LV'T 01 pa sSuudS uewn9 wail 09-21S uo saue3 8ulgwl19 prui suegie0 NOISMDNl Mid (JA/ow) i suo0 �+e35'I LI/9TOZ Ad 9i/STOZ Ad Si/VIOZ Ad Vi/£TOZ Ad (saseyd Ile) Da »1 % y3;ew A3ua2V anew A3uaft po sanbaa 8wpund elll1 I pafoid I weallddV/Ama2V pea3 1dV210 SID3rOlid a03llbD 9NIaNniiilf1W £TOZ 2013 MULTI -FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS - RSTP / MARA EVALUATION AND SCHEDULE DRAFT Lead Agency/Applicant Project Title Funding Requested Agency match Agency match % TCC TPC (all phases) Start Cons (mo/yr) Total Project ire IN FTIP RTPID FTIP INCLUSION FORMAL/ ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENT ANTICIPATED 2013 FTIP APPROVAL PROGRAM FUNDING YEAR* FFY=FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR Indio 1-10/Jefferson St. lc Improvements $14,499,925 $47,173,575 76.49% 61,673,500 74,033,500 May-14 40 47520 47520 2013 FTIP -A17 AND 2015 FTIP FORMAL 4/25/2014 FFY 15/16 San Jacinto** Ramona Exp. Widening from Eagle Rd. to Main St $2,675,000 $3,27o,000 55.00% 5,945,000 6,545,000 April-14 35 RIV120203 3AL204 IN FTIP NOT REQUIRED FFY 13/14 Riverside County** Clinton Keith Road Extension from Whitewood Rd. to Leon Rd. (Ph II) $16,500,000 $22,978,000 58.20% 39,478,000 57,780,000 Sep. 2014 35 RIV011236 RIV011236 IN FTIP NOT REQUIRED FFY 13/14 Riverside County I-215/NewportIC Improvements $14,625,000 $17,875,000 55.00% 32,500,000 37,300,000 Aug. 2014 33 1111/050534 RIV050534 2013FTIP -A16 AND 2015 FTIP ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION 12/30/2013 FFY 14/15 Perris** I-215/Nuevo Rd IC Ramp Improvements $1,600,000 $2,000,000 55.56% 3,600,000 3,600,000 Feb. 2014 31 RIV131006 3M04WT014 2015 FTIP FORMAL 12/30/2014 FFY 13/14 Beaumont SR60/ Potrero IC Ph.1 $6,523,154 $8,662,846 57.04% 15,186,000 27,186,000 Jan. 2014 31 RIV050535 RIV050535 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP FORMAL 4/25/2014 FFY 13/14 Indio Hwy 111 Improvements - Rubidoux St. to 760' W/O Madison St $4,680,000 $5,720,000 55.00% 10,400,000 10,920,000 June-15 30 RIV153001 3A07031 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP FORMAL 4/25/2014 FFY 16/17 Riverside Magnolia Ave. Widening - Buchanan St. to Banbury Dr. $2,620,000 $3,410,000 56.60% 6,025,000 6,326,200 March-15 30 RIV151216 REG0703 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP FORMAL 4/25/2014 FFY 15/16 Temecula Interstate 15/SR79 South IC $12,976,100 $15,860,000 55.00% 28,836,100 46,0013,942 Dec. 2014 28 118/62031 RIV62031 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP FORMAL 4/25/2014 FFY 14/15, FFY 15/16 Riverside County Cajalco Rd. Widening and Safety Enhancements - Temescal Canyon Rd. to 1-215 (PA&ED) $3,000,000 $8,000,000. 72.73% 11,000,000 302,367,000 Jan.2011 RIV090903, 3A04WT137A 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015FTIP 1 FORMAL �%25i2S71_ FF716/17 Page No.1 As of 12/09/2013 RSTP/MARA 2013 MULTI -FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS - RSTP / MARA EVALUATION AND SCHEDULE DRAFT 1 Lead Ptoject Agency/Applicant Tide Funding Requested Agency match Agency match % TCC TPC (all phases) Phases) Start Cons (mo/yr) Total Project Score IN FTIP RTPID FTIP INCLUSION FORMAL/ ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENT ANTICIPATED 2013 FTIP APPROVAL PROGRAM FUNDING YEAR* FFY FISCAL YEAR Moreno Valley SR60/Theodore St IC Improvements (PA&ED) $964,000 $1,178,000 55.00% 2,142,000 48,200,000 July-13 RIV080904 3M0801 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP FORMAL 4/25/2014 FFY 13/14 Riverside Adams St at SR91-Ramp Reconfiguration (PA&ED) $935,000 $165,000 15.00% 1,100,000 1,100,000 Feb. 2014 RIV131202 712003 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 MP FORMAL 4/25/2014 FFY 14/15 Coachella Avenue 48 Widening and Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities -Jackson St. to Van Buren St $2,278,250 $1,226,750 35.00% 3,505,000 3,600,000 July-14 27 RIV151217 3A07057 2013 FTIP - A17 AND 2015 FTIP FORMAL 4/25/2014 FFY 15/16 Jurupa Valley** Limonite Ave Widening - Etiwanda to Bain 51,882,000 $2,325,000 55.27% 4,207,000 4,207,000 July-14 27 NO NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED FFY 13/14 Moreno Valley** Cactus Ave Widening - EB from Veterans Way to Heacock St. / Signal Sychronization $1,527,500 $822,500 35.00% 2,350,000 2,350,000 Sep.2014 27 RIV071240 RIV071240 IN FTIP NOT REQUIRED FFY 13/14 Corona** Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension $21,000,000 $35,500,000 62.83% 56,500,000 56,500,000 Jan-14 N/A RIV010209 RIV010209 IN FTIP NOT REQUIRED FFY 13/14 $108,285,929 ** = CEQA ONLY Page No. 2 As of 12/09/2013 RSTP/MARA AGENDA ITEM 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: January 27, 2014 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director SUBJECT: 2014 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Submittal STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On December 11, 2013, staff submitted the Riverside County 2014 STIP - Regional Transportation Improvement Program to the California Transportation Commission. The submittal included two carryover state highway projects from the 2012 STIP, two new state highway project improvements, the B Canyon Wildlife Crossing, the CVLink, and funding increase for the Project Programming and Monitoring, fully programming Riverside County's apportionment of $69,696,000. The attached summary provides the listing of projects nominated by our Commission for STIP funding. The STIP adoption is scheduled for March 20, 2014. Staff will continue working with SCAG, incorporating the 2014 STIP funding into the 2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). SUMMARY OF 2014 STIP COUNTY SHARE PROPOSALS Does Not Include ITIP Interregional Share Funding (See Separate Listing) ($1,000's) Riverside Project Totals by Fiscal Year Project Totals by Component Agency Rte PPNo Project Ext Del. Voted Total Prior 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 RNV Const E & P PS&E ww sup con sup STIP Projects at Fund Estimate (August 2013) RCTC loc 77J Rt 91 Improvement (design-build)(08S-58)(ext 6-12) Jul-13 Mar-13 2,000 2,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 0 0 0 0 RCTC 9803 Planning, programming, and monitoring May-13 664 664 0 0 0 0 0 0 664 0 0 0 0 Ca!trans 15 21K French Valley Parkway interchange 31,545 0 0 31,545 19,510 0 0 0 0 14,245 0 0 0 17,300 Riverside Co. loc 53A Rt 10, Jefferson St WC, widen OC (construction) 19,510 0 0 0 0 0 0 19,510 0 0 Cr 0 RCTC 9803 Planning, programming, and monitoring 2,655 664 664 664 663 0 0 0 2,655 0 0 0 0 RCTC rail 1114 Perris Valley Line, commuter rail extnsn (08S-35)(ext 6-11) Feb-13 Dec-12 52,978 52,978 0 0 0 0 0 0 52,978 0 0 0 0 RCTC 1112 - TE.reserve 4,700 1,600 0 0 3,100 0 0 0 4,700 0 0 0 0 _res, - J _ Total Programmed or Voted since July 1, 2012 114,052 PROPOSED 2014 PROGRAMMING Highway Proiect Proposals Riverside Co. loc 53A Rt 10, Jefferson St I/C, widen OC (construction) -19,510 0 0 -19,510 0 0 0 0 -19,510 0 0 0 0 Riverside Co. loc 53A Rt 10, Jefferson St DC, widen OC (construction) 33,310 0 33,310 0 0 0 0 0 33,310 0 0 0 0 Ca!trans 15 21K French Valley Parkway interchange -31,545 0 0 -31,545 0 0 0 0 -14,245 0 0 0 -17,300 Caltrans 15 21K French Valley Parkway interchange 41,545 0 0 41,545 0 0 0 0 24,245 0 0 0 17,300 Ca!trans 60 46J Truck Climbing/Descending Lnw/shoulderimprov.(SHOPP) NEW 32,105 0 7,550 24,555 0 0 0 200 18,755 0 7,000 350 5,800 Caftans 91 71E B Canyon Wildlife Crossing Corridor NEW 1,480 0 1,300 180 0 0 0 80 0 100 1,200 100 0 RCTC loc 108T Rt 215 South Bound Connector (SHOPP) NEW 8,975 0 0 0 10 8,965 0 10 8,965 0 0 0 0 RCTC 9803 Planning, programming, and monitoring -2,655 -664 -664 -664 -663 0 0 0 -2,655 0 0 0 0 RCTC 9803 Planning, programming, and monitoring 3,991 664 664 664 663 668 668 0 3,991 0 0 0 0 Subtotal, Highway Projects 67,696 0 42,160 15,225 10 9,633 668 290 522 856 100 8,200 450 5 800 Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Proposals: CVAG loc 1019 CV Link Palm Springs -Coachella, multiuse path (Ph1) NEW 2,000 0 0 0 0 2,000 0 0 2,000 0 0 0 0 RCTC res 1112 TE reserve Delete -4,700 -1,600 0 0 -3,100 0 0 0 -4,700 0 0 0 0 RCTC res 1112 TE reserve 1,600 1,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,600 0 0 0 0 Subtotal Bike & Ped Projects -1,100 0 0 0 -3,f00- Zb60 -0- Cr -1-,100 Cr- 0 0 0 Total Proposed 2014 STIP Programming 66,596 0 42,160 15,225 -3,090 11,633 668 290 51,756 100 8,200 450 5,800 Nominated Projects Not Included in Staff Recommendations Notes: RTIP adopted 11/13/13 Balance of STIP County Share, Riverside Total County Share, June 30, 2013 Total Now Programmed or Voted Since July 1, 2012 Unprogrammed Share Balance Share Balance Advanced or Overdrawn 129,432 114,052 15,380 0 Proposed New Programming Target Maximum 66,596 69,696 98,571 Under (Over) Target California Transportation Commission 3,100 Page 1 of 1 tJ1fi{2014 AGENDA ITEM 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: January 27, 2014 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager SUBJECT: Active Transportation Program — CTC Draft Guidelines for Statewide and MPO Funding and Upcoming Call for Projects STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: RCTC has been actively participating and monitoring the development of the Draft Active Transportation Program (ATP) Guidelines prepared for the California Transportation Commission (CTC) adoption on March 20. Two hearings are required before the ATP Guidelines are approved the CTC. The first hearing took place in Los Angeles on January 22. The second hearing is scheduled for January 29 in Sacramento. The following is the proposed schedule for the adoption of the guidelines as well as the Call for Projects FY 2014. Guidelines submitted to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee CTC adopts ATP Guidelines Call for Projects Project applications to Caltrans Large MPOs submit optional guidelines to Caltrans CTC approves or rejects MPO guidelines Staff Recommendations for statewide and rural/small urban ATP CTC adopts statewide and rural/small urban ATP Projects not programmed distributed to large MPOs based on Location MPO project programming recommendations to the CTC CTC adopts MPO selected projects Feb. 3, 2014 March 20, 2014 March 21, 2014 May 21, 2014 May 21, 2014 June 25, 2014 Aug. 8, 2014 Aug. 20, 2014 Aug. 20, 2014 Sep. 30, 2014 Nov. 2014 DRAFT ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES 4\) 1/17/14 CONTENTS Introduction 1 Background 1 Program Goals 1 Program Schedule 1 Funding 2 Source 2 Distribution 2 Matching Requirements 3 Funding For Active Transportation Plans 4 Reimbursement 4 Eligibility 4 Eligible Applicants 4 Partnering with Implementating Agencies 5 Eligible Projects 5 Minimum Request for Funds 5 Example Projects 6 Project Type Requirements 7 Disadvantaged Communities 7 Safe Routes to School Projects 7 Recreational Trails Projects 8 Technical Assistance Resource Center 8 Project Selection Process 8 Project Application 8 Sequential Project Selection 9 MPO Competitive Project Selection 9 Screening Criteria 9 Scoring Criteria 10 Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) i Project Evaluation Committee 11 Programming 11 Project Programming 11 Allocations 12 Project Delivery 13 Project Inactivity 14 Project Reporting 14 Roles and Responsibilities 15 California Transportation Commission (Commission) 15 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) 15 Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) with large urbanized areas 16 Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPAs) outside an MPO with Large Urbanized Areas and an MPO without Large Urbanized Areas 16 Project Applicant 17 Active Transportation Plan 17 Federal Requirements 18 Design Standards 19 Program Evaluation 19 Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) ii INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND The Active Transportation Program was created by Senate Bill 99 (Chapter 359, Statutes of 2013) and Assembly Bill 101 (Chapter 354, Statutes of 2013) to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking and walking. These guidelines describe the policy, standards, criteria, and procedures for the development, adoption and management of the Active Transportation Program. The guidelines were developed in consultation with the Active Transportation Program Workgroup. The workgroup includes representatives from Caltrans, other government agencies, and active transportation stakeholder organizations with expertise in pedestrian and bicycle issues, including Safe Routes to School programs. The California Transportation Commission (Commission) must hold at least two public hearings prior to adopting the Active Transportation Program guidelines. The Commission may amend the adopted guidelines after conducting at least one public hearing. The Commission must make a reasonable effort to amend the guidelines prior to a call for projects or may extend the deadline for project submission in order to comply with the amended guidelines. PROGRAM GOALS Pursuant to statute, the goals of the Active Transportation Program are to achieve: • Increase the proportion of trips accomplished by biking and walking. • Increase the safety and mobility of non -motorized users. • Advance the active transportation efforts of regional agencies to achieve greenhouse gas reduction goals as established pursuant to Senate Bill 375 (Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008) and Senate Bill 391 (Chapter 585, Statutes of 2009). • Enhance public health, including reduction of childhood obesity through the use of programs including, but not limited to, projects eligible for Safe Routes to School Program funding. • Ensure that disadvantaged communities fully share in the benefits of the program. • Provide a broad spectrum of projects to benefit many types of active transportation users. PROGRAM SCHEDULE The guidelines for an initial two-year program of projects must be adopted by March 26, 2014 (within six months of enactment of the authorizing legislation). No later than 45 days prior to adopting the initial set of guidelines for the Active Transportation Program, the Commission must submit the draft guidelines to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee. Subsequent programs must be adopted not later than April 1 of each odd -numbered year, however, the Commission may alternatively elect to adopt a program annually. Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 1 The following schedule lists the major milestones for the development and adoption of the 2014 Active Transportation Program: Commission adopts Fund Estimate Guidelines hearing, South Guidelines hearing, North Guidelines submitted to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee Commission adopts Active Transportation Program Guidelines Call for projects Project applications to Caltrans Large MPOs submit optional guidelines to Caltrans Commission approves or rejects MPO guidelines Staff recommendation for statewide and rural/small urban portions of the program Commission adopts statewide and rural/small urban portions of the program Projects not programmed distributed to large MPOs based on location Deadline for MPO project programming recommendations to the Commission Commission adopts MPO selected projects December 11, 2013 January 22, 2014 January 29, 2014 February 3, 2014 March 20, 2014 March 21, 2014 May 21, 2014 May 21, 2014 June 25, 2014 August 8, 2014 August 20, 2014 August 20, 2014 September 30, 2014 November 2014 SOURCE The Active Transportation Program is funded from various federal and state funds appropriated in the annual Budget Act. These are: • 100% of the federal Transportation Alternative Program funds, except for federal Recreation Trail Program funds appropriated to the Department of Parks and Recreation. • $21 million of federal Highway Safety Improvement Program funds or other federal funds. • State Highway Account funds. In addition to furthering the goals of this program, all Active Transportation Program projects must meet eligibility requirements specific to at least one of the Active Transportation Program's funding sources. DISTRIBUTION State and federal law segregate the Active Transportation Program into multiple, overlapping components. The Active Transportation Program Fund Estimate must indicate the funds available for each of the program components. Consistent with these requirements, the Active Transportation Program funds must be distributed as follows: 1. Forty percent to Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) in urban areas with populations greater than 200,000. These funds must be distributed based on total coup-ty MPO population. The funds programmed and allocated under this paragraph must be selected through a competitive process by the MPOs in accordance with these guidelines. Projects selected by MPOs may be in either large urban, small urban, or rural areas. Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 2 25% of the funds distributed to each MPO must benefit disadvantaged communities. The following statutory requirements apply specifically to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) • SCAG must consult with county transportation commissions, the Commission, and Caltrans in the development of competitive project selection criteria. • The criteria used by SCAG should include consideration of geographic equity, consistent with program objectives. • SCAG must place priority on projects that are consistent with plans adopted by local and regional governments within the county where the project is located. • SCAG must obtain concurrence from the county transportation commissions. 2. Ten percent to small urban and rural areas with populations of 200,000 or less, with projects competitively awarded by the Commission to projects in those regions. Federal law segregates the Transportation Alternative Program into separate small urban and rural competitions based upon their relative share of the state population. Small Urban areas are those with populations of 5,001 to 200,000. Rural areas are those with populations of 5,000 or less. 25% of the funds in the Small Urban and Rural programs must benefit disadvantaged communities. Projects within the boundaries of a MPO with an urban area with a population of greater than 200,000 are not eligible for funding in the Small Urban or Rural programs. 3. Fifty percent to projects competitively awarded by the Commission on a statewide basis. 25% of the funds in the statewide competitive program must benefit disadvantaged communities. In the initial program, a minimum of $24 million per year of the statewide competitive program is available for safe routes to schools projects, with at least $7.2 million for non -infrastructure grants, including funding for a state technical assistance resource center. MATCHING REQUIREMENTS Projects must include at least 12 11.47% in matching funds except for projects benefiting a disadvantaged community, stand-alone non -infrastructure projects and safe routes to schools projects. The source of the matching funds may be any combination of local, state or federal funds. Matching funds must be expended in the same project phase (permits and environmental studies; plans, specifications, and estimates; right-of-way capital outlay; support for right-of-way acquisition; construction capital outlay; and construction engineering) as the Active Transportation Program funding. Matching funds cannot be expended prior to the Commission allocation of Active Transportation Program funds. Matching funds, except matching funds over and above the required .1-2-11.47%, must be expended concurrently and proportionally to the Active Transportation Program funds. Large MPOs, in administering a competitive selection process, may require a larger different funding match for projects selected through their competitive process. Applicants from within a large MPO should be aware that the match requirements may differ between the MPO and statewide competitive programs. Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 3 FUNDING FOR ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANS Funding from the Active Transportation Program may be used to fund the development of bike, pedestrian, safe routes to schools, or active transportation plans in disadvantaged communities. The Commission intends to set aside up to 5% of the funds in the statewide competitive program and in the rural and small urban program for funding active transportation plans in disadvantaged communities. A large MPO, in administering its portion of the program, ehatt may make up to 5% of its funding available for active transportation plans in disadvantaged communities within the MPO boundaries. The first priority for the funding of active transportation plans will be for cities, counties, county transportation commissions, regional transportation planning agencies, MPOs, school districts, or transit districts that have neither a bicycle plan, a pedestrian plan, a safe routes to schools plan, nor an active transportation plan. The second priority for the funding of active transportation plans will be for cities, counties, county transportation commissions, regional transportation planning agencies, or MPOs that have a bicycle plan or a pedestrian plan but not both. REIMBURSEMENT The Active Transportation Program is a reimbursement program for costs incurred. Reimbursement is requested through the invoice process detailed in Chapter 5, Accounting/Invoices, Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Costs incurred prior to Commission allocation and, for federally funded projects, Federal Highway Administration project approval (i.e. Authorization to Proceed) are not eligible for reimbursement. ELIGIBILITY ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS The applicant for Active Transportation Program funds assumes responsibility and accountability for the use and expenditure of program funds. Applicants must be able to comply with all the federal and state laws, regulations, policies and procedures required to enter into a Local Administering Agency -State Master Agreement (Master Agreement). Refer to Chapter 4, Agreements, of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual for guidance and procedures on Master Agreements. The following entities, within the State of California, are eligible to apply for Active Transportation Program funds: • Local, Regional or State Agencies- Examples include city, county, MPO*, and Regional Transportation Planning Agency. • Caltrans* • Transit Agencies - Any agency responsible for public transportation that is eligible for funds under the Federal Transit Administration. • Natural Resource or Public Land Agencies - Federal, Tribal, State, or local agency responsible for natural resources or public land administration Examples include: o State or local park or forest agencies o State or local fish and game or wildlife agencies o Department of the Interior Land Management Agencies o U.S. Forest Service Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 4 • Public schools or School districts • Tribal Governments - Federally -recognized Native American Tribes. • Private nonprofit tax-exempt organizations may apply for Recreational Trail Projects. Projects must benefit the general public, and not only a private entity. • Any other entity with responsibility for oversight of transportation or recreational trails that the Commission determines to be eligible. For funding awarded to a tribal government, a fund transfer to the Bureau of Indian Affairs ilea may be necessary. A tribal government may also partner with another eligible entity to apply if desired. * Caltrans and MPOs, except for MPOs that are also regional transportation planning agencies, are not eligible project applicants for the federal Transportation Alternative Program funds appropriated to the Active Transportation Program. Therefore, funding awarded to projects submitted directly by Caltrans and MPOs are limited to other Active Transportation Program funds. Caltrans and MPOs may partner with an eligible entity to expand funding opportunities. PARTNERING WITH IMPLEMENTATING AGENCIES Entities that are unable to apply for Active Transportation Program funds or that are unable to enter into a Master Agreement with the State must partner with an eligible applicant that can implement the project. Entities that are unfamiliar with the requirements to administer a Federal -Aid Highway Program project may partner with an eligible applicant that can implement the project. This arrangement must be formalized through a signed Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement between the project applicant and implementing agency. The implementing agency will be responsible and accountable for the use and expenditure of program funds. ELIGIBLE PROJECTS All projects must be selected through a competitive process and must meet one or more of the program goals. Because the majority of funds in the Active Transportation Program are federal funds, most projects must be federal -aid eligible: • Infrastructure Projects: Capital improvements that will further the goals of this program. This typically includes the planning, design, and construction of facilities. • Non -infrastructure Projects: Education, encouragement, enforcement, and planning activities that further the goals of this program. The Commission intends to focus funding for non -infrastructure projects on pilot and start-up projects that can demonstrate funding for ongoing efforts. The Active Transportation Program funds are not intended to fund ongoing program operations. Non - infrastructure projects are not limited to those benefiting school students. • Infrastructure projects with non -infrastructure components. MINIMUM REQUEST FOR FUNDS In order to maximize the effectiveness of program funds and to encourage the aggregation of small projects into a comprehensive bundle of projects, the minimum request for Active Transportation Program Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 5 funds that will be considered is $250,000. This minimum does not apply to non -infrastructure projects, Safe Routes to Schools projects, and Recreational Trails projects. MPOs, in administering a competitive selection process, may use a different minimum funding size. Use of a minimum project size greater than $500,000 must be approved by the Commission prior to the MPO's call for projects. EXAMPLE PROJECTS Below is a list of projects considered generally eligible for Active Transportation Program funding. This list is not intended to be comprehensive; other types of projects that are not on this list may also be eligible if they further the goals of the program. • Development of new bikeways and walkways that improve mobility, access, or safety for non - motorized users. • Improvements to existing bikeways and walkways, which improve mobility, access, or safety for non -motorized users. o Elimination of hazardous conditions on existing bikeways and walkways. o Preventative maintenance of bikeways and walkways with the primary goal of extending the service life of the facility. • Installation of traffic control devices to improve the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists. • Safe Routes to School projects that improve the safety of children walking and bicycling to school, in accordance with Section 1404 of Public Law 109-59. • Safe routes to transit projects, which will encourage transit by improving biking and walking routes to mass transportation facilities and school bus stops. • Secure bicycle parking at employment centers, park and ride lots, rail and transit stations, and ferry docks and landings. • Bicycle -carrying facilities on public transit, including rail and ferries. • Establishment or expansion of a bike share program. • Recreational trails and trailheads, park projects that facilitate trail linkages or connectivity to non - motorized corridors, and conversion of abandoned railroad corridors to trails. • Development of a bike, pedestrian, safe routes to schools, or active transportation plan in a disadvantaged community. • Education programs to increase bicycling and walking, and other non -infrastructure investments that demonstrate effectiveness in increasing active transportation, including but not limited to: o Development and implementation of bike -to -work or walk -to -work school day/month programs. o Conducting bicycle and/or pedestrian counts, walkability and/or bikability assessments or audits, or pedestrian and/or bicycle safety analysis to inform plans and projects. o Conducting pedestrian and bicycle safety education programs. o Development and publishing of community walking and biking maps, including school route/travel plans. o Development and implementation of walking school bus or bike train programs. o Components of open streets events directly linked to the promotion of a new infrastructure project. o Targeted enforcement activities around high pedestrian and/or bicycle injury and/or fatality locations (intersections or corridors). These activities cannot be general traffic enforcement but must be tied to improving pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 6 o School crossing guard training. o School bicycle clinics. o Development and implementation of programs and tools that maximize use of available and emerging technologies to implement the goals of the Active Transportation Program. PROJECT TYPE REQUIREMENTS As discussed in the Funding Distribution section (above), State and Federal law segregate the Active Transportation Program into multiple, overlapping components. Below is an explanation of the requirements specific to these components. DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES For a project to contribute toward the Disadvantaged Communities funding requirement, the project must clearly demonstrate a benefit to a community that meets any of the following criteria: • The median household income is less than 80% of the statewide average median based on the most current census tract level data from the American Community Survey. Data is available at http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml • An area identified as among the most disadvantaged 10% in the state according to latest versions of the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen) scores. Scores are available at http://oehha.ca.gov/ej/ces11.html. • At least 75% of public school students in the project area are eligible to receive free or reduced - price meals under the National School Lunch Program. Data is available at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/sd/filessp.asp. Applicants using this measure must indicate how the project benefits the school students in the project area or, for projects not directly benefiting school students, explain why this measure is representative of the larger community. If a project applicant believes a project benefits a disadvantaged community but the project does not meet the aforementioned criteria, the applicant must submit for consideration a quantitative assessment of why the community should be considered disadvantaged. MPOs, in administering a competitive selection process, may use different criteria for determining which projects benefit Disadvantaged Communities if the criteria are approved by the Commission prior to the MPO's call for projects. SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECTS For a project to contribute toward the Safe Routes to School funding requirement, the project must directly increase safety and convenience for public school students to walk and/or bike to school. Safe Routes to Schools infrastructure projects must be located within two miles of a public school or within the vicinity of a public school bus stop. Other than traffic education and enforcement activities, non - infrastructure projects do not have a location restriction. Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 7 RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROJECTS For trail projects that are primarily recreational to be eligible for Active Transportation Program funding, the projects must meet the federal requirements of the Recreational Trails Program as such projects may not be eligible for funding from other sources (http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/recreational_trails/). Multi -purpose trails and paths that serve both recreational and transportation purposes are generally eligible in the ATP, so long as they are consistent with one or more goals of the program. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE RESOURCE CENTER In 2009, the University of California, San Francisco was awarded federal Safe Routes to School funds to act as the Technical Assistance Resource Center for the purpose of building and supporting local regional Safe Routes School non -infrastructure projects. Typical center roles have included: • Providing technical assistance and training to help agencies deliver existing and future projects and to strengthen community involvement in future projects including those in disadvantaged communities. • Developing and providing educational materials to local communities by developing a community awareness kit, creating an enhanced Safe Routes to Schools website, and providing other educational tools and resources. • Participating in and assisting with the Safe Routes to Schools Advisory Committee. • Assisting with program evaluation. The Commission intends to comply with the statutory requirement to fund a state technical assistance center by expanding the existing Safe Routes to Schools Technical Assistance Resource Center interagency agreement to serve all Active Transportation Program non -infrastructure projects. PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS PROJECT APPLICATION Active Transportation Program project applications will be available at www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/atp/index.html. A project application must include the signature of the Chief Executive Officer or other officer authorized by the applicant's governing board. Where the project is to be implemented by an agency other than the applicant, documentation of the agreement between the project applicant and implementing agency must be submitted with the project application. A project application must also include documentation of all other funds committed to the projects. Project applications should be addressed or delivered to: Caltrans Division of Local Assistance, MS-1 Attention: April Nitsos P.O. Box 942874 Sacramento, CA 95814 Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 8 Except for applications submitted through an optional MPO supplemental call for project, the Commission will consider only projects for which five hard copies and one electronic copy (via cd or portable hard drive) of a complete application are received by May 21, 2014. By the same date, an additional copy must also be sent to the Regional Transportation Planning Agency or County Transportation Commission within which the project is located and to the MPO (a contact list can be found at wwvv.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/offices/orip/). SEQUENTIAL PROJECT SELECTION All project applications, except for applications submitted through an optional MPO supplemental call for projects, must be submitted to Ca!trans for consideration in the statewide competition. The Commission will consider approval of a competitive grant only when it finds that the grant request meets the requirements of statute and that the project has a commitment of any supplementary funding needed for a full funding plan. Projects not selected for programming in the statewide competition must be considered in the large MPO run competitions or the state run Small Urban or Rural competitions. A large urban MPO may elect to have a supplemental MPO specific call for projects. The projects received in this call must be considered along with those not selected through the statewide competition. MPO COMPETITIVE PROJECT SELECTION As stated above, projects not selected for programming in the statewide competition must be considered by the MPOs in administering a competitive selection process. An MPO choosing to use the same project selection criteria and weighting, minimum project size, match requirement, and definition of disadvantage communities as used by the Commission for the statewide competition may defer its project selection to the Commission. An MPO deferring its project select to the Commission may not conduct a supplemental call for projects. An MPO, with Commission approval, may use a different project selection criteria or weighting, minimum project size, match requirement, or definition of disadvantage communities for its competitive selection process. Use of a minimum project size of $500,000 or less, or of a larger different match requirement than in the statewide competitive program does not require prior Commission approval. An MPO may also elect to have a supplemental MPO specific call for projects. The projects received in this call must be considered along with those not selected through the statewide competition. In administering a competitive selection process, a MPO must use a multidisciplinary advisory group to assist in evaluating project applications. Following its competitive selection process, a MPO must submit its programming recommendations to the Commission along with a list of the members of its multidisciplinary advisory group. If the MPO submitted a project application and that project is recommended for programming, the MPO must explain how its evaluation process resulted in an unbiased evaluation of projects. SCREENING CRITERIA Demonstrated needs of the applicant: A project that is already fully funded will not be considered for funding in the Active Transportation Program. The Commission will make an exception to this policy by allowing the supplanting of federal funds on a project for the 2014 Active Transportation Program. Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 9 Consistency with a regional transportation plan: All projects submitted must be consistent with the relevant adopted regional transportation plan that has been developed and updated pursuant to Government Code Section 65080. SCORING CRITERIA Proposed projects will be rated and ranked on the basis of applicant responses to the below criteria. Project programming recommendations may not be based strictly on the rating criteria given the various components of the Active Transportation Program and requirements of the various fund sources. • Potential for increased walking and bicycling, especially among students, including the identification of walking and bicycling routes to and from schools, transit facilities, community centers, employment centers, and other destinations; and including increasing and improving connectivity and mobility of non -motorized users. (0 to 30 points) • Potential for reducing the number and/or rate of pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities and injuries, including the identification of safety hazards for pedestrians and bicyclists. (0 to 25 points) • Public participation and Planning. (0 to 15 points) Identification of the community -based public participation process that culminated in the project proposal, which may include noticed meetings and consultation with local stakeholders. Project applicants must clearly articulate how the local participation process resulted in the identification and prioritization of the proposed project. For projects costing $1 million or more, an emphasis will be placed on projects that are prioritized in an adopted city or county bicycle transportation plan, pursuant to Section 891.2, pedestrian plan, safe routes to school plan, active transportation plan, trail plan, or circulation element of a general plan that incorporated elements of an active transportation plan. In future funding cycles, the Commission expects to make consistency with an approved active transportation plan a requirement for large projects. • Cost-effectiveness, defined as maximizing the impact of the funds provided. (0 to 10 points) Applicants must discuss the relative costs and benefits of the range of alternatives considered and quantify the safety and mobility benefit in relationship to total project cost. Ca[trans must develop a benefit/cost model for infrastructure and non -infrastructure active transportation projects in order to improve information available to decision makers at the state and MPO level in future programming cycles. • Improved public health through the targeting of populations with high risk factors for obesity, physical inactivity, asthma or other health issues. (0 to 10 points) • Benefit to disadvantaged communities. (0 to 10 points) • Use of the California Conservation Corps or a qualified community conservation corps, as defined in Section 14507.5 of the Public Resources Code, as partners to undertake or construct applicable projects in accordance with Section 1524 of Public Law 112-141. Points will be deducted if an applicant does not seek corps participation or if an applicant intends not to utilize a corps in a project in which the corps can participate. (0 to -5 points) Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 10 The California Conservation Corps can be contacted at ccc.ca.gov. Community conservation corps can be contacted at californialocalconservationcorps.org. Direct contracting with the California Conservation Corps or a qualified community conservation corps without bidding is permissible provided that the implementing agency demonstrates cost effectiveness per 23 CFR 635.204 and obtains approval from Caltrans. A copy of the agreement between the implementing agency and the proposed conservation corps must be included in the project application as supporting documentation. • Applicant's performance on past grants. This may include project delivery, project benefits (anticipated v. actual), and use of the California Conservation Corps or qualified community conservation corps (planned v. actual). Applications from agencies with documented poor performance records on past grants may be excluded from competing or may be penalized in scoring. (0 to -10 points) PROJECT EVALUATION COMMITTEE Commission staff will form a multidisciplinary Project Evaluation Committee to assist in evaluating project applications. In forming the Project Evaluation Committee, staff will seek participants with expertise in bicycling and pedestrian transportation, including Safe Routes to Schools type projects, and in projects benefiting disadvantaged communities, and will seek geographically balanced representation from state agencies, large MPOs, regional transportation planning agencies, local jurisdictions in small urban and rural areas, and non -governmental organizations. Priority for participation in the evaluation committee will be given to those who do not represent a project applicant, or will not benefit from projects submitted by others. In reviewing and selecting projects to be funded with federal Recreational Trails program funds, the Commission staff will collaborate with the Department of Parks and Recreation to evaluate proposed projects. MPOs, in administering a competitive selection process, must use a multidisciplinary advisory group, similar to the aforementioned Project Evaluation Committee, to assist in evaluating project applications. PROGRAMMING PROJECT PROGRAMMING Following at least one public hearing, the Commission will adopt a program of projects for the Active Transportation Program, by April 1 of each odd numbered year. The Active Transportation Program must be developed consistent with the fund estimate and the amount programmed in each fiscal year must not exceed the amount identified in the fund estimate. The program of projects for each fiscal year will include, for each project, the amount to be funded from the Active Transportation Program, and the estimated total cost of the project. Project costs in the Active Transportation Program will include all project support costs and all project listings will specify costs for each of the following components: (1) completion of all permits and environmental studies; (2) preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates; (3) right-of-way capital outlay (4) support for right-of- way acquisition; (5) construction capital outlay; and (6) construction management and engineering, including surveys and inspection. The cost of each project component will be listed in the Active Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 11 Transportation Program no earlier than in the fiscal year in which the particular project component can be implemented. When proposing to fund only preconstruction components for a project, the applicant must demonstrate the means by which it intends to fund the construction of a useable segment, consistent with the regional transportation plan or the Caltrans interregional transportation strategic plan. When project design, right-of-way or construction are programmed before the implementing agency completes the environmental process, updated cost estimates, updated analysis of the project's cost effectiveness, and updated analysis of the project's ability to further the goals of the program must be submitted to the Commission following completion of the environmental process. If this updated information indicates that a project is expected to accomplish fewer benefits or is less cost effective as compared with the initial project application, future funding for the project may be deleted from the program. For the MPO selected competitions, this information must be submitted to the MPO. It is the responsibility of the MPO to recommend that the project be deleted from the program if warranted. The Commission will program and allocate funding to projects in whole thousands of dollars and will include a project only if it is fully funded from a combination of Active Transportation Program and other committed funding. The Commission will regard funds as committed when they are programmed by the Commission or when the agency with discretionary authority over the funds has made its commitment to the project by ordinance or resolution. For federal formula funds, including Surface Transportation Program, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program, and federal formula transit funds, the commitment may be by Federal approval of the Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program. For federal discretionary funds, the commitment may be by federal approval of a full funding grant agreement or by grant approval. If the program of projects adopted by the Commission does not program the full capacity identified in the fund estimate for a given fiscal year, the balance will remain available to advance programmed projects. Subject to the availability of federal funds, a balance not programmed in one fiscal year will carry over and be available for projects in the following fiscal year. over into a subsequent fund estimate. The intent of the Commission is to consolidate the allocation of federal funds to as few projects as practicable. Therefore, the smallest project may be designated, at the time of programming, for state -only funding. The Commission will consider the allocation of funds for a project when it receives an allocation request and recommendation from Caltrans in the same manner as for the STIP (see section 64 of the STIP guidelines). The recommendation will include a determination of project readiness, the availability of appropriated funding, and the availability of all identified and committed supplementary funding. Where the project is to be implemented by an agency other than the applicant, the allocation request must include a copy of the Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement between the project applicant and implementing agency. The Commission will approve the allocation if the funds are available and the allocation is necessary to implement the project as included in the adopted Active Transportation Program. Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 12 In order to ensure the timely use of all program funds, the Commission will, in the last quarter of the fiscal year, allocate funds to projects programmed in a future fiscal year on a first -come, first served basis. If there are insufficient funds, the Commission may delay the allocation of funds to a project until the next fiscal year without requiring an extension. Should requests for allocations exceed available capacity, the Commission will give priority to projects programmed in the current -year. Allocation requests for a project in the MPO selected portion of the program must include a recommendation by the MPO. In compliance with Section 21150 of the Public Resources Code, the Commission will not allocate funds for design, right-of-way, or construction prior to documentation of environmental clearance under the California Environmental Quality Act. As a matter of policy, the Commission will not allocate funds for design, right-of-way, or construction of a federally funded project prior to documentation of environmental clearance under the National Environmental Policy Act. Exceptions to this policy may be made in instances where federal law allows for the acquisition of right-of-way prior to completion of National Environmental Policy Act review. If an implementing agency requests an allocation of funds in an amount that is less than the amount programmed, the balance of the programmed amount may be allocated to a programmed project advanced from a future fiscal year. An MPO, in administering its competitive portion of the Active Transportation Program, must determine which projects to advance and make that recommendation to the Commission. Unallocated funds in one fiscal year will carry over and be available for projects in the following fiscal year. PROJECT DELIVERY Active Transportation Program allocations must be requested in the fiscal year of project programming, and are valid for award for six months from the date of allocation unless the Commission approves an extension. Applicants may submit and the Commission will evaluate extension requests in the same manner as for STIP projects (see section 66 of the STIP guidelines) except that extension to the period for project allocation and for project award will be limited to twelve months. Extension requests for a project in the MPO selected portion of the program must include a recommendation by the MPO, consistent with the preceding requirements. If there are insufficient funds, the Commission may delay the allocation of funds to a project until the next fiscal year without requiring an extension. Whenever programmed funds are not allocated within the fiscal year they programmed or within the time allowed by an approved extension, the project will be deleted from the Active Transportation Program. Funds available following the deletion of a project may be allocated to a programmed project advanced from a future fiscal year. An MPO, in administering its competitive portion of the Active Transportation Program, must determine which projects to advance and make that recommendation to the Commission. Unallocated funds in one fiscal year will carry over and be available for projects in the following fiscal year. The implementing agency must enter into a cooperative agreement with Caltrans and, if the project is federally funded, obligate the federal funds within six months. Funds allocated for project development or right of way costs must be expended by the end of the second fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the funds were allocated. After the award of a contract, the Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 13 implementing agency has up to 36 months to complete (accept) the contract. At the time of fund allocation, the Commission may extend the deadline for completion of work and the liquidation of funds if necessary to accommodate the proposed expenditure plan for the project. The implementing agency has six months after contract acceptance to make the final payment to the contractor or vendor, prepare the final Report of Expenditure and submit the final invoice to Caltrans for reimbursement. It is incumbent upon the implementing agency to develop accurate project cost estimates. If the amount of a contract award is less than the amount allocated, or if the final cost of a component is less than the amount awarded, the savings generated will not be available for future programming. Caltrans will track the delivery of Active Transportation Program projects and submit to the Commission a semiannual report showing the delivery of each project phase. PROJECT INACTIVITY Once funds for a project are encumbered, project applicants are expected to invoice on a regular basis (for federal funds, see 23 CFR 630.106 and the Caltrans' Inactive Obligation Policy). Failure to do so will result in the project being deemed "inactive" and subject to deobligation if proper justification is not provided. PROJECT REPORTING As a condition of the project allocation, the Commission will require the implementing agency to submit semi-annual reports on the activities and progress made toward implementation of the project and a final delivery report. An agency implementing a project in the MPO selected portion of the program must also submit copies of its semi-annual reports and of its final delivery report to the MPO. The purpose of the reports is to ensure that the project is executed in a timely fashion and is within the scope and budget identified when the decision was made to fund the project. Within one year of the project becoming operable, the implementing agency must provide a final delivery report to the Commission which includes: • The scope of the completed project as compared to the programmed project. • Before and after photos documenting the project. • The final costs as compared to the approved project budget. • Its duration as compared to the project schedule in the project application. • Performance outcomes derived from the project as compared to those described in the project application. This should include before and after pedestrian and/or bicycle counts, and an explanation of the methodology for conduction counts. • Actual use of the California Conservation Corps or qualified community conservation corps as compared to the use in the project application. Please note that the final delivery report required by this section is in addition to the aforementioned final Report of Expenditures. For the purpose of this section, a project becomes operable when the construction contract is accepted or acquired equipment is received, or in the case of non -infrastructure activities, when the activities are complete. Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 14 Caltrans must audit a sample of Active Transportation Program projects to evaluate the performance of the project, determine whether project costs incurred and reimbursed are in compliance with the executed project agreement or approved amendments thereof; state and federal laws and regulations; contract provisions; and Commission guidelines, and whether project deliverables (outputs) and outcomes are consistent with the project scope, schedule and benefits described in the executed project agreement or approved amendments thereof. A report on the projects audited must be submitted to the Commission annually. DOLES AND RESPO CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (COMMISSION) The Commission responsibilities include: • Adopt guidelines and policies for the Active Transportation Program. • Adopt Active Transportation Program Fund Estimate. • Evaluate projects, including the forming of the Project Evaluation Committee. • Adopt a program of projects, including: o The statewide portion of the Active Transportation Program, o The rural portion of the Active Transportation Program, o The small urban portion of the Active Transportation Program, and o The MPO selected portion of the program based on the recommendations of the MPOs. o Ensure that at least 25% of the funds benefit disadvantage communities. • Allocate funds to projects. • Evaluate and report to the legislature. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) Caltrans has the primary responsibility for the administration of the Active Transportation Program. Responsibilities include: • Provide statewide program and procedural guidance (i.e. provide project evaluation of materials and instructions), conducts outreach through various networks such as, but not limited to, the Active Transportation Program website, and at conferences, meetings, or workgroups. • Provide program training. • Solicit project applications for the program. • Facilitate the Project Evaluation Committee. • Perform eligibility reviews of Active Transportation Program projects. • Review project applications for scope, cost, schedule, and completeness. Evaluate, score, and rank applications. • Recommend projects to the Commission for programming and allocation. • Notify applicants of the results after each call for projects. • Track and report on project implementation. • Audit a selection of projects • Serve as the main point of contact in project implementation, resource center, after notifying successful applicants of award. including the technical assistance Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 15 METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS (MPOS) WITH LARGE URBANIZED AREAS MPOs with large urbanized areas are responsible for overseeing a competitive project selection process in accordance with these guidelines. The responsibilities include: • Ensure that at least 25% of the funds in each MPO must benefit disadvantage communities. • If using different project selection criteria or weighting, minimum project size, match requirement, or definition of disadvantage communities for its competitive selection process, the MPO must obtain Commission approval prior to the MPO's call for projects. Use of a minimum project size of $500,000 or less, or of a larger different match requirement than in the statewide competitive program does not require prior Commission approval. • If electing to have a supplemental MPO specific call for projects, the projects within the MPO boundaries that were not selected through the statewide competition must be considered along with those received in the supplemental call for projects. • In administering a competitive selection process, a MPO must use a multidisciplinary advisory group to assist in evaluating project applications. • In administering a competitive selection process, a MPO must explain how the projects recommended for programming by the MPO include a broad spectrum of projects to benefit pedestrians and bicyclists. The explanation must include a discussion of how the recommended projects benefit students walking and cycling to school. • An MPO choosing to use the same project selection criteria and weighting, minimum project size, match requirement, and definition of disadvantage communities as used by the Commission for the statewide competition may defer its project selection to the Commission. An MPO deferring its project select to the Commission must notify the Commission my May 21, 2014, and may not conduct a supplemental call for projects. • Approve amendments to the MPO selected portion of the program prior to Commission approval. • Recommend allocation requests for a project in the MPO selected portion of the program. • Determine which projects to advance and make that recommendation to the Commission. • Submit an annual assessment of its portion of the program it terms of its effectiveness in achieving the goals of the Active Transportation Program. In addition, the following statutory requirements apply specifically to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG): • SCAG must consult with county transportation commissions, the Commission, and Caltrans in the development of competitive project selection criteria. The criteria should include consideration of geographic equity, consistent with program objectives. • SCAG must place priority on projects that are consistent with plans adopted by local and regional governments within the county where the project is located. • SCAG must obtain concurrence from the county transportation commissions. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCIES (RTPAS) OUTSIDE AN MPO WITH LARGE URBANIZED AREAS AND AN MPO WITHOUT LARGE URBANIZED AREAS These Regional Transportation Planning Agencies and MPOs may make recommendations or provide input to the Commission regarding the projects within their boundaries that are applying for Active Transportation Program funding. Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 16 PROJECT APPLICANT Project applicants nominate Active Transportation Program projects for funding consideration. If awarded Active Transportation Program funding for a submitted project, the project applicant (or partnering implementing agency if applicable) has contractual responsibility for carrying out the project to completion and complying with reporting requirements in accordance with federal, state, and local laws and regulations, and these guidelines. For capital projects off the state highway system, the project applicant will be responsible for the ongoing operations and maintenance of the facility. If another entity agrees to assume responsibility for the ongoing operations and maintenance of the facility, documentation of the agreement must be submitted with the project application, and a copy of the Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement between the parties must be submitted with the request for allocation. ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN A city, county, county transportation commission, regional transportation planning agency, MPO, school district, or transit district may prepare an active transportation plan. An active transportation plan prepared by a city or county may be integrated into the circulation element of its general plan or a separate plan. An active transportation plan must include, but not be limited to, the following components or explain why the component is not applicable: a) The estimated number of existing bicycle trips and pedestrian trips in the plan area, both in absolute numbers and as a percentage of all trips, and the estimated increase in the number of bicycle trips and pedestrian trips resulting from implementation of the plan. b) The number and location of collisions, serious injuries, and fatalities suffered by bicyclists and pedestrians in the plan area, both in absolute numbers and as a percentage of all collisions and injuries, and a goal for collision, serious injury, and fatality reduction after implementation of the plan. c) A map and description of existing and proposed land use and settlement patterns which must include, but not be limited to, locations of residential neighborhoods, schools, shopping centers, public buildings, major employment centers, and other destinations. d) A map and description of existing and proposed bicycle transportation facilities. e) A map and description of existing and proposed end -of -trip bicycle parking facilities. f) A description of existing and proposed policies related to bicycle parking in public locations, private parking garages and parking lots and in new commercial and residential developments. g) A map and description of existing and proposed bicycle transport and parking facilities for connections with and use of other transportation modes. These must include, but not be limited to, parking facilities at transit stops, rail and transit terminals, ferry docks and landings, park and ride lots, and provisions for transporting bicyclists and bicycles on transit or rail vehicles or ferry vessels. h) A map and description of existing and proposed pedestrian facilities at major transit hubs. These must include, but are not limited to, rail and transit terminals, and ferry docks and landings. i) A description of proposed signage providing wayfinding along bicycle and pedestrian networks to designated destinations. j) A description of the policies and procedures for maintaining existing and proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities, including, but not limited to, the maintenance of smooth pavement, freedom from encroaching vegetation, maintenance of traffic control devices including striping and other pavement markings, and lighting. Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 17 k) A description of bicycle and pedestrian safety, education, and encouragement programs conducted in the area included within the plan, efforts by the law enforcement agency having primary traffic law enforcement responsibility in the area to enforce provisions of the law impacting bicycle and pedestrian safety, and the resulting effect on accidents involving bicyclists and pedestrians. I) A description of the extent of community involvement in development of the plan, including disadvantaged and underserved communities. m) A description of how the active transportation plan has been coordinated with neighboring jurisdictions and is consistent with other local or regional transportation, air quality, or energy conservation plans, including, but not limited to, general plans and a Sustainable Community Strategy in a Regional Transportation Plan. n) A description of the projects and programs proposed in the plan and a listing of their priorities for implementation, including the methodology for project prioritization and a proposed timeline for implementation. o) A description of past expenditures for bicycle and pedestrian facilities and programs, and future financial needs for projects and programs that improve safety and convenience for bicyclists and pedestrians in the plan area. Include anticipated revenue sources and potential grant funding for bicycle and pedestrian uses. p) A description of steps necessary to implement the plan and the reporting process that will be used to keep the adopting agency and community informed of the progress being made in implementing the plan. q) A resolution showing adoption of the plan by the city, county or district. If the active transportation plan was prepared by a county transportation commission, regional transportation planning agency, MPO, school district or transit district, the plan should indicate the support via resolution of the city(s) or county(s) in which the proposed facilities would be located. A city, county, school district, or transit district that has prepared an active transportation plan may submit the plan to the county transportation commission or transportation planning agency for approval. The city, county, school district, or transit district may submit an approved plan to Caltrans in connection with an application for funds active transportation facilities which will implement the plan. Additional information related to active transportation plans can be found in the sections on Funding for Active Transportation Plans and Scoring Criteria. LEDERAL REQUIREMENTS Unless programmed for state -only funding, project applicants must comply with the provisions of Title 23 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations and with the processes and procedures contained in the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual and the Master Agreement with Caltrans. Below are examples of federal requirements that must be met when administering Active Transportation Program projects. • National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance and documentation is required on all projects. Refer to Chapter 6, Environmental Procedures, of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual for guidance and procedures on complying with NEPA and other federal environmentally related laws. • Project applicants may not proceed with the final design of a project or request "Authorization to proceed with Right -of -Way" or "Authorization to proceed with Construction" until Caltrans has Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 18 signed a Categorical Exclusion, a Finding of No Significant Impact, or a Record of Decision. Failure to follow this requirement will make the project ineligible for federal reimbursement. • If the project requires the purchase of right of way (the acquisition of real property), the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 apply. For more information, refer to Chapter 13, Right of Way, of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual. • If the project applicant requires the consultation services of architects, landscape architects, land surveyors, or engineers, the procedures in the Chapter 10, Consultant Selection, of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual must be followed. • Contract documents are required to incorporate applicable federal requirements such as Davis Bacon wage rates, competitive bidding, Disadvantaged Business Enterprises/Equal Employment Opportunity provisions, etc. For more information, refer to Chapter 9, Civil Rights and Disadvantaged Business Enterprises, and Chapter 12, Plans, Specifications & Estimate, of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual Failure to comply with federal requirements may result in the repayment to the State of Active Transportation Program funds. DESIGN STAND Streets and Highways Code Section 891 requires that all city, county, regional, and other local agencies responsible for the development or operation of bikeways or roadways where bicycle travel is permitted utilize all minimum safety design criteria established by Caltrans. Chapter 11, Design Standards, of the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual describes statewide design standards, specifications, procedures, guides, and references that are acceptable in the geometric, drainage, and structural design of Local Assistance projects. The chapter also describes design exception approval procedures, including the delegation of design exception approval authority to the City and County Public Works Directors for projects not on the state highway system. These standards and procedures, including the exception approval process, must be used for all Active Transportation Program projects cxccpt rccrcation trail:, projectJ. For capital projects off the state highway system, the project applicant will be responsible for the ongoing operations and maintenance of the facility. If another entity agrees to assume responsibility for the ongoing operations and maintenance of the facility, documentation of the agreement must be submitted with the project application, and a copy of the Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement between the parties must be submitted with the request for allocation. All facilities constructed using Active Transportation Program funds cannot revert to a non -Active Transportation Program use for a minimum of 20 years or its actual useful life as documented in the project application, whichever is less, without approval of the Commission. The Active Transportation Program will be evaluated for its effectiveness in increasing the use of active modes of transportation in California. Applicants that receive funding for a project must collect and submit data to Caltrans as described in the "Project Reporting" section. Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 19 By December 31, 2014, the Commission will post on its website information about the initial program of projects, including a list of all projects programmed and allocated in each portion of the program, by region, and by project type, along with information on grants awarded to disadvantaged communities, After 2014, the Commission will include in its annual report to the Legislature a discussion on the effectiveness of the program in terms of planned and achieved improvement in mobility and safety and timely use of funds, and will include a summary of its activities relative to the administration of the Active Transportation Program including: • Projects programmed, • Projects allocated, • Projects completed to date by project type, • Projects completed to date by geographic distribution, • Projects completed to date by benefit to disadvantaged communities, and • Projects completed to date with the California Conservation Corps or qualified community conservation corps. Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 20 AGENDA ITEM 11 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 11. AGENDA ITEM 12 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: January 27, 2014 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager SUBJECT: Measure A Local Streets and Roads — FY 2013/14 Mid -Year Revenue STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On January 8, 2014, Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer presented to the Commission the mid -year FY 2013/14 revenue projections for Measure A, as well as the FY 2014/15 projections. The projected revenues for FY 2013/14 increased from $147 M to $157 M. The attached FY 2013/14 Revised Measure A Allocation Projections reflects the Measure A Local Streets and Roads allocations to the cities and the County of Riverside. The upcoming FY 2014/15 projections increased by $10 M from the revised mid -year FY 2013/14 projections. Next month you will be receiving the annual Measure A Local Streets and Roads revenue projections, maintenance of effort certification, and Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan notification for FYs 2014/15 through 2018/19. Your cooperation in making the established deadlines for approvals is appreciated. Attachments: Measure A FY 2013/14 Revised Projections Measure A FY 2014/15 Projections RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A PROGRAM ALLOCATION (PROJECTION) FY 2013/14 (Revised (1/8/14) ORIGINAL Increase REVISED (01.08.14) (01.09.13) (Decrease) Revenues $ 157,000,000 $ 147,000,000 $ 10,000,000 Less: Administration 2,800,000 2,800,000 - APPORTIONMENT TO PROGRAMS $ 154,200,000 $ 144,200,000 $ 10,000,000 Western County Highway Improvements $ 35,189,000 $ 32,907,000 $ 2,282,000 New Corridors Public Transit Commuter Rail 7,038,000 Intercity Bus 1,759,000 Specialized Transit -Operations 2,199,000 Specialized Transit-CTSA 733,000 Commuter Services 1,725,000 Regional Arterial 10,350,000 Local Streets & Roads 33,465,000 BANNING $ 502,000 BEAUMONT CALIMESA 142,000 CANYON LAKE 158,000 CORONA 3,507,000 EASTVALE 944,000 HEMET 1,521,000 JURUPA VALLEY 1,590,000 LAKE ELSINORE 1,062,000 MENIFEE 1,348,000 MORENO VALLEY 3,354,000 MURRI ETA 1,963,000 NORCO 570,000 PERRIS 1,277,000 RIVERSIDE 6,328,000 SAN JACINTO 731,000 TEMECULA 2,598,000 W I LDO MAR 521,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 4,644,000 RCTC Regional Arterial 705,000 Bond Financing 9,315,000 Economic Development Projects 1,380,000 SUBTOTAL -Western County 115,918,000 Coachella Valley Highways & Regional Arterials Local Street & Roads CATHEDRAL CITY COACHELLA DESERT HOT SPRINGS INDIAN WELLS INDIO LA QUINTA PALM DESERT PALM SPRINGS RANCHO MIRAGE RIVERSIDE COUNTY CVAG Specialized & Public Transit SUBTOTAL -Coachella Valley Palo Verde Valley Local Street & Roads BLYTHE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUBTOTAL -Palo Verde Valley 1,362,000 618,000 467,000 248,000 1,620,000 1,484,000 2,650,000 1,983,000 870,000 1,715,000 18,597,000 13,017,000 5,579,000 12,765,000 11,937,000 828,000 6,581,000 1,645,000 2,057,000 686,000 1,613,000 9,679,000 31,294,000 457,000 114,000 142,000 47,000 112,000 671,000 2,171,000 470,000 132,000 148,000 3,279,000 882,000 1,422,000 1,487,000 993,000 1,261,000 3,136,000 1,836,000 533,000 1,194,000 5,918,000 684,000 2,429,000 487,000 4,344,000 659,000 32,000 10,000 10,000 228,000 62,000 99,000 103,000 69,000 87,000 218,000 127,000 37,000 83,000 410,000 47,000 169,000 34,000 300,000 46,000 8,711,000 1,291,000 604,000 89,000 108,401,000 7,517,000 17, 391, 000 1,206,000 12,173,000 844,000 1,274,000 578,000 437,000 231,000 1,515,000 1,387,000 2,478,000 1,854,000 814,000 1,605,000 88,000 40,000 30,000 17,000 105,000 97,000 172,000 129,000 56,000 110,000 5,217,000 362,000 37,193,000 34,781,000 2,412,000 1,089,000 1,018,000 71,000 866,000 56,000 223,000 15,000 1,089,000 1,018,000 71,000 810,000 208,000 TOTAL $ 154,200,000 $ 144,200,000 $ 10,000,000 Note: Estimate for Planning Purposes, subject to change and rounding differences. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE A PROGRAM ALLOCATION (PROJECTION) FY 2014/15 Revenues $ 167,000,000 Less: Administration 2,900,000 APPORTIONMENT TO PROGRAMS $ 164,100,000 Western County Highway Improvements $ 37,613,000 New Corridors 13,644,000 Public Transit Commuter Rail 7,523,000 Intercity Bus 1,881,000 Specialized Transit -Operations 2,351,000 Specialized Transit-CTSA 783,000 Commuter Services 1,844,000 Regional Arterial 11,063,000 Local Streets & Roads 35,769,000 BANNING $ 530,000 BEAUMONT CALIMESA 149,000 CANYON LAKE 169,000 CORONA 3,707,000 EASTVALE 1,088,000 HEMET 1,611,000 JURUPA VALLEY 1,802,000 LAKE ELSINORE 1,137,000 MENIFEE 1,438,000 MORENO VALLEY 3,586,000 MURRIETA 2,065,000 NORCO 599,000 PERRI S 1,353,000 RIVERSIDE 6,655,000 SAN JACINTO 718,000 TEMECULA 2,744,000 W I LDOMAR 555,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 5,112,000 RCTC Regional Arterial 751,000 Bond Financing 9,956,000 Economic Development Projects 1,475,000 SUBTOTAL -Western County 123,902,000 Coachella Valley Highways & Regional Arterials Local Street & Roads CATHEDRAL CITY COACHELLA DESERT HOT SPRINGS INDIAN WELLS INDIO LA QUINTA PALM DESERT PALM SPRINGS RANCHO MIRAGE RIVERSIDE COUNTY CVAG Specialized & Public Transit SUBTOTAL -Coachella Valley 1,401,000 629,000 494,000 244,000 1,716,000 1,509,000 2,718,000 2,048,000 876,000 2,007,000 Palo Verde Valley Local Street & Roads BLYTHE $ 973,000 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 249,000 SUBTOTAL -Palo Verde Valley TOTAL 19,488,000 13,642,000 5,846,000 38,976,000 1,222,000 1,222,000 $ 164,100,000 Note: Estimate for Planning Purposes, subject to change and rounding differences. AGENDA ITEM 13 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 13. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION REVIEW COMMITTEE TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION/CTC PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM A Funding Opportunity to Accelerate Traffic Flow Improvements in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Work Plan (Draft) January 23, 2014 1. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION'S ROLE AS THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY State of California (State) law created the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) in 1976 to oversee the funding and coordination of all public transportation services within Riverside County. RCTC's mission is to assume a leadership role in improving mobility in the County. As the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA), RCTC is responsible for setting policies, establishing priorities and coordinating activities among the County's various transit operators and other agencies. RCTC also programs and/or reviews the allocation of federal, state and local funds for highway, transit, rail and non-motorized travel (bicycle and pedestrian), and other transportation activities. 2. BACKGROUND As part of the FY 2012/13 and FY 2014/15 Work Program, the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) allocated $5.0 million to accelerate the implementation of traffic signal coordination, synchronization, ramp metering, and technology enhancement projects that will improve traffic flow on arterial roadways in the South Coast region. MSRC is allocating $1.25 million to each of the County Transportation Commissions (CTCs): the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Orange County Transportation Authority, San Bernardino Associated Governments and RCTC. RCTC has a history of distributing funds among three geographic areas in the County: Western Riverside, Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley. For consistency with previous allocation of STIP funds, RCTC recommends the allocation of $1.25 million in MSRC funding as follows: • $939,625 -(75.17%) -Western Riverside; and • $310,375 (24.83%) -Coachella Valley As outlined in MSRC's Invitation to Negotiate, the following traffic signal coordination and synchronization project categories are eligible under the Traffic Signal Program: • Arterial Corridor Traffic Signal Coordination within a Single Jurisdiction; • Multi-Jurisdictional Traffic Signal Coordination, including Regional Programs; • Coordination of Adjacent Intersection Traffic Signals with Caltrans' Freeway Onramp Metering (adaptive onramp metering); and • Expansion and Limited Upgrades to Existing Traffic Management/Operations Centers. In addition, other project categories are potentially eligible if shown to offer meaningful air quality benefits. The final determination of project eligibility will remain the sole authority of the MSRC. As the RTPA, RCTC respectfully submits the following work plan for consideration to receive $1.25 million in Clean Transportation Funding for the Traffic Signal Coordination CTC Partnership Program (Traffic Signal Program). 3. WORK PLAN -PROPOSED PROJECTS Recently, RCTC released a Multi-Funding Call for Projects for a wide variety of street improvements, expanded freeway interchanges, and active transportation improvements for bicyclists and pedestrians. A total of 55 projects were submitted through the Call for Projects requesting $282 million in funding. Of the 55 projects submitted, the following three projects are ideal for allocation under the Traffic Signal Program for Western Riverside: • Project Title: Traffic Flow Improvements Lead Agency: City of Eastvale Total Project Cost: $383,300 Agency Match: $116,725 Proposed MSRC Funding: $74,625 (19% of Total Project Cost) Other Funding: $191,950 Project Description: Install traffic synchronization to six (6) existing traffic signalized intersections along Hamner Avenue from Schleisman to Eastvale Gateway. • Project Title: Traffic Signal Synchronization -an Element of the Transportation Management Center Lead Agency: City of Moreno Valley Total Project Cost: $2,400,000 Agency Match: $268,300 Proposed MSRC Funding: $490,000 (20% of Total Project Cost) Other Funding: $1,641,700 Project Description: The proposed work includes the deployment of critical field devices and supporting communications system as a part of the City's traffic management system. Improvements include an Ethernet fiber-optic backbone system, CCTV cameras at 16 key intersections, and new traffic signal controllers at 45 existing signalized intersections. • Project Title: Magnolia Avenue Signal Interconnect Lead Agency: City of Riverside Total Project Cost: $1,855,000 Agency Match: $462,500 Proposed MSRC Funding: $375,000 (20% of Total Project Cost) Other Funding: $1,017,500 Project Description: Remove existing interconnect copper wires and replace them with fiber optic interconnects. Project will connect 49 signalized intersections within the city of Riverside and future connection to the city of Corona's Traffic Management Center, Moreno Valley and Caltrans. In Coachella Valley, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) released a Call for Projects in December 2013. Results from that call are due in February 2014. Once finalized, CVAG will identify project(s) for proposed MSRC funding in an amount not to exceed $310,375. Once completed, RCTC will submit the proposed Coachella Valley project(s) for MSRC's review. 4. PROPOSED BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE A proposed budget and implementation schedule is attached as Exhibit A. Copies of the actual proposals received under the Call for Projects are also available if needed. 5. AIR QUALITY BENEFITS A component of RCTC's Call for Projects included an Air Quality Analysis and Benefit-Cost Analysis for the three proposed projects; results are attached as Exhibit B. 6. WORK PLAN STATUS AND POTENTIAL REVISION RCTC submits the proposed projects and budget in draft form and expects revisions as we collaborate with CVAG and MSRC. A final work plan, budget and schedule will be submitted at that time. MSRC's Traffic Signal Coordination CTC Partnership Program Attachment A Recommended MSRC lead Agency/Applicant Project Title Total Project Cost Agency Match MSRC Funding Other Funding Match% Start End -Eastvale Traffic Flow Improvements $ 383,300 $ 116,725 $ 74,625 $ 191,950 19% 5/2014 5/2015 Moreno Valley Traffic Signal Synchronization Project $ 2,400,000 $ 268,300 $ 490,000 $ 1,641,700 20% 1/2014 7/2015 Riverside Magnolia Avenue Signal Interconnect $ 1,855,000 $ 462,500 $ 375,000 $ 1,017,500 20% 2/2014 9/2015 CVAG TBD based on CVAG's Call for Projects $ 310,375 $ 1,250,000 Recommended MSRC funding based on the following information: Funding Percentages Used for Recommended MSRC Funding Available 2014 STIP Geographic Areas Amount $ 1,250,000 75.17% Western County $ 939,625 24.12% Coachella Valley (CV) 0.71% Palo Verde Valley {PW) 24.83% CV & PW {Blythe) Total 310,375 1,250,000 ATTACHMENT B Riverside County Transportation Commission 2013 Multi Funding Call for Projects Western Riverside County Air Quality Benefit Assessment 3.14 Hamner Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Implementing Agency: City of Eastvale Project Description: Air Quality Analysis: ROG Emission CO Emission Benefits Benefits (kg/day) (kg/day) 0.230 3.945 Benefit Cost Analysis Results: .!::!!!:9'.d• Costs mil $ Life-Cyde Benefits (mi Net Present Value (mil. J:3ent;fit I Cost Ratio: Rate of Return on Investment: ······························-·----'--- Payback Peflod:· NO. Emission PM 10 Emission PM 2.s Emission Benefits Benefits (kg/day) (kg/day) 0.351 0.046 INVESTMENT ANALYSIS SUllllARY' RESULlS ~~-~l 1 ye.-~ Person-Hours of lime-Saved C02 Emissions Sawd (tons} Benefits (kg/day) 0.043 C02 Emissions Sawd (mil.$) C02E Emission Benefits (kg/day) 2,333.155 3.20 Traffic Signal Synchronization Riverside County Transportation Commission 2013 Multi Funding Call for Projects Western Riverside County Air Quality Benefit Assessment Implementing Agency: City of Moreno Valley Project Description: Air Quality Analysis: ROG Emission CO Emission Benefits Benefits (kg/day) (kg/day) 3.844 55.921 Benefit Cost Analysis Results: Benefit I Cost Ratio: Payback Period: NO. Emission PM 10 Emission PM 2•5 Emission Benefits Benefits (kg/day) (kg/day) 0.378 0.136 IWESTMENT ANALYSIS SUllllARY RESULlS 1,_-i ITEMIZED Bl!NEFllS (mil. $) Travel Time Savings Person-Hours of Time Saved C02 Emissions Saved (tons} Benefits (kg/day) 0.126 C02 Emissions Saved (mil. $} C02E Emission Benefits (kg/day) 11,087.046 Riverside County Transportation Commission 2013 Multi Funding Call for Projects Western Riverside County Air Quality Benefit Assessment 3.33 Magnolia Avenue Traffic Signal Technology Upgrade Implementing Agency: City of Riverside Project Description: This project will upgrade the traffic signal coordination technology along Magnolia Avenue from Buchanan to Third Street by removing existing interconnect copper wires and replacing them with fiber optic interconnects. Air Quality Analysis: ROG Emission CO Emission NO. Emission PM 10 Emission PM 2•5 Emission C02E Emission Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits (kg/day) (kg/day) (kg/day) (kg/day) (kg/day) (kg/day) 4.357 34.927 5.498 0.168 0.155 4,513.52 Benefit Cost Analysis Results: The applicant provided a detailed Benefit Cost assessment that quantified the benefit ratio as 11.5:1. There is not enough raw data in the application to replicate this value; however, it appears reasonable relative to similar projects in this category. AGENDA ITEM 14 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 14. AGENDA ITEM 15 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 15. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: January 31, 2014 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission Technica!Advjsory TUMF Subcommittee FROM: Shirley Medina, Planning and,Programming Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: Transportation Unjform Mitigation .Fee Regional Arterial Program Funds for the Perris Boulevard Widening Project . . · TECHNICAL ADVISORY TUMF SUBCOMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMBNDATION: This item 'is for the Commission 'to: 1) Approve the request from the city of Moreno Valley (Moreno Valley) for $3 million in Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial program funds for the construction of the Perris. Boulevard widening project, Ironwood Avenue to Manzanita Avenue; 2) Approve ~greemeot No. 06-72-041-03, Amendment No.. 3 to Agreement No. 06-72-04t-OO, with Moreno Valley to add TUMF funds in the amount of $3 million for construction; and · ·' ' 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement ·on behalf of the Commission; BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Moreno Valley is requesting $3 million of TUMF Regional Arterial program funds to complete the funding for the Perris Boulevard widening project from Ironwood Avenue to Manzanita Avenue. The proposed funding includes: Fund Source Construction Amount Comment TUMF Regional Arterial $ 1,600,000 Commission approved 10/09/13 Prop lB State-Locaf Partnership 1,000,000 CTC extension deadline, May 2014 .City Funds 400,000 Funding Shortfall 3,000,000 Requesting TUMF Regional Arterial Total Construction $ 6,000,000 As noted above, the Commission recently approved reprogramming $1.6 million in project savings from the widening of Perris Boulevard from Cactus Avenue to Perris Valley Storm Drain Lateral "B" segment to the Ironwood-Manzanita segment. The Technical Advisory TUMF Subcommittee, consisting of public works directors, meets periodically to review programmi~g neeas, status of revenues, project prioritization and delivery. ·The subcommittee convened on January 15 to di5cuss»M,o._re,no Valley's request and ta review 'be adjustments to the TUMF revenue forecast. aased · on revised TUMF revenue projections and the conclusion of the ,FY '2oi:2/13 fiscal audit, the ·TUMF projected fund balance avaUable as. of June 30, 2015, has been revised to $14. 7 million. The subcommittee continues to support construction programming as a high priority. Given the lapsing deadline of the State Proposition 18 funds j;lnd the Perris Boulevard project is ready for construction, the ·Staff and the subcommittee . recommend approval of Moreno Valley's request for $3 million of TUMF Regional Arterial funds for this project. Jhe subcomrriittee also discussed the need to reevaluate current 'projects approved as part of .the.~orjginaLTUME Regional Arteri.al program in 2004. · Ove{the i'l'¢X,t. few months, project sp~~s~r~ will. p.rovide ui»dat~s on th; projects, and the subcommittee will consider prioritizing the projects according .to.~ei:y so,edtdes and any past. 9C1;iQO:S. taken.· by ~t® CPmmission pr ·-' .. ,,,. ., ' • ' "•' •.• ·" «· • local agencies that may have impacted the priority or feasibility of the projects originally approved in 2004. In addition, the 10 percent set-aside for developer credit r:eirnburs~ment will also be reviewed and adjusted to reflect the revenue adjustment. Financial ·information ' . . ·,,.' ; .. . .. 'I,, In Fiscal Year Budget: I N/ A I Year: I FY 2014/15+ Amount: I $3,000,000 · ... sua.get AdJustment: I N/ A GL/Project Accounting No.: 005105 81301 210 72 81301 FiSc::a1·Prot:ectures·Approved~ · I Date: I · · 01/21/-14