HomeMy Public PortalAbout01 January 27, 2014 Technical Advisory CommitteeCOMM-TAC-00024
TIME:
DATE:
LOCATION:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA*
*Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda.
10:00 A.M. to 12:00 P.M.
January 27, 2014
Riverside County Transportation Commission
4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special
assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact the Riverside County Transportation Commission
at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that
reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting.
1. Call to Order
2. Self -Introductions
3. Approval of November 18, 2013 Minutes
4. Public Comments (This is for comments on items not listed on agenda. Comments
relating to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is before the Committee.)
5. 2013 FTIP Update (Attachment)
6. 2015 FTIP Update — Transportation Control Measure Projects (Attachment)
7. Draft FFY 2013/14 Delivery Plan (Attachment)
8. Multi -Funding Call for Projects — Commission Approval (Attachment)
MOU — Project Delivery
9. 2014 STIP Submittal (Attachment)
10. Active Transportation Program — Draft Guidelines and Upcoming Call for Projects
(Attachment)
11. TIGER VI Funding Opportunities (Verbal Presentation)
12. Measure A Local Streets and Roads Mid -Year Revenue Projections (Attachment)
13. MSRC's Clean Transportation Funding — Traffic Signal Coordination Program (Verbal
Presentation)
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
January 27, 2014
Page 2
14. Local Assistance Update (Verbal Presentation)
15. January Commission Meeting Highlights (Verbal Presentation)
16. Other Business
17. Adjournment (The next meeting will be March 17 in Beaumont.)
AGENCY BANNING BEAUMONT BLYTHE CVAG CALIMESA TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 27, 2014 TAC MEMBER ALTERNATE DUANE BURK Kahono Oei Director of Public Works KISHEN PRATHIVADI !Kevin Hughes Assistant Director of Public ~ ARMANDO BALDIZZONE Director of Public Works V Frank Luckino Finance Director MICHAEL SHOBERG I Allyn Waggle V--Transportation Program Manager Deputy Director MICHAEL THORNTON City Engineer Bob French Public Works Director PRINT NAME }(~IV(l 0~ ~eJ~ -r. W<f-'thf~ i~~~L-\'1 tL,a;MQ_ -r ~ SIGNATURE ~ tfUv_0 Jtt; 0CALTRANS l=~::GLo~IAMisra.re ~i~::::~~~J {w~ Yeu"_I_ I {-lz-.-------------i "0S COACHELLA , HABIB MOTLAGH City Engineer BILL SIMONS Interim City Engineer JONATHAN HOY City Engineer ~ l''Ll.5 ·\ ~ ~~, ~ ~, -:z------·----Maritza Martinez Interim Public Works Director CORONA ____ ._ ___ -tNE~SON N_ELSON . R~be_rt Mo~i~ . _ I~ A .--,~ ~ Acting Pubhc Works Director Principal C1v1I Engineer ~ f"t/fo4, e~ ~ .... ______ _ DESERT HOT RUDY ACOSTA DanielPo_rras v . ~V\•~-~~<·"'-...,. ---------~ ----~( __ SPRINGS Acting Public Works Director Public Works Contract Engineer
ORGE ALVAREZ HEMET .. A \f. IV\ JORGE BIAGIONI Engineering Director/City Engineer INDIAN WELLS KEN SEUMALO Jt;2z INDIO -------1GRANT EKLUND Public Works Director/City Engineer JURUPA VALLEY TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 27, 2014 Victor Monz ~~ Bondie Baker Assistant Engineer II LA QUINTA / !TIMOTHY JONASSON rryan McKinney I ~ ""'-j qvuiS~ V\.-Public Works Dir~ct~r/City_E_n:eer Princip-al ~ngineer LAKE ELSINORE ATI ESKANDARI Interim Public Works Director MENIFEE JONATHAN SMITH Robert Johnson Acting City Engineer Interim City Manager MORENO VALLEY t-HMAD-ANSARI Prem Kumar Public Works Director/City Engineer Deputy Public Works Direct' Assistant City Engineer / MURRIETA I BOB MOEHLING--Jim Holsten City Engineer Assistant City Manager NORCO BILL THOMPSON Lori Askew Director of Public Works Sr. Engineer
PALM DESERT PALM SPRINGS PERRlff JV" BO CHEN City Engineer DAVE BARAKIAN Director of Public Works/ City Engineer HABIB MOTLAGH City Engineer ----·---· --------.. RT A --4GQRDcm-RGBINSGN L I Director of Planning --·---· ~ JL ori A ~ ku. R..V... Pf) IA RANCHO MIRAGE I BRUCE HARRY I Director of Public Works RIVERSIDE TOM BOYD Public Works Director RIVERSIDE C~NTYIJUAN PEREZ \l,., , Director of Transportation SAN JACINTO I HABIB MOTLAGH ~/' City Engineer -----··--SUNLINE JOE FORGIARINI Director of Transit Planning TEMECULA IAMERATTAR Acting City Engineer DAN YORK Director of Public Works/City Engineer RUTHANNE TAYLOR-BERGER Deputy Executive Director TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 27, 2014 Mark Diercks Transportation Engineer Savat Khamphou Lorelle Moe-Lu~1) Senior Planner .. 1 I Bill Enos City Engineer Farshid Mohammadi Engineering Manager Patty Romo Deputy Director of Transportation Greg Butler 41,~JJe~ P?e fl#£11K1flt!/ .j312vce... 1-h.----, Assistant City Manag~~----··-1 ~r31t-Janet Morales Administrative Assistant Donna Dean Program Manager ~ )__ ~ l~p +;ir.s kcL fv1c ~ M.f\-q_J,( ....... "-~--
AGENCY ----------·--------KGfc Q{c Tc_ --~--·----------------------O(e,Tc . ---------Cifj r0f t101eno Y~;, , ---------------------Mo12-e:.Jo \)A u.,e,, y C 1-.hi of /Ax\a. ?f ~" .. )'""""' J:.-' G 1 +c)-ct bc:o_ L'. rr. c t -y\-__ R~vo&ti~:dz G.:,J..vtfw I ~txC/ --~ Lr/£ /1-;,~c:x·1 A Te~ Cc. \"\·ro.~ . ., -Pl" ..... n" "J-r------------·------TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 27, 2014 NAME TELEPHONE OR E-MAIL -+lv~ -OLit<t<~ t·«------------·-l-/r,,, O~ Ct l v il /\t '-->-----------·---------·-------·---------· ----------------------~ -(1S!)--~/3-3/C?O Ve7 NfHPrD /y.j.:s;ve/ C?/?rrJL?/d ~~y__~, C2(g I E--pic LEMJ t S E{?-1 C..LrE.. ~ Mo·JAL .. o~6 -------12. \~ \Ht) ~ "'--~_\ r±hom6'-:>c:..<J')@ ~-f:\s1~~ ~O~ Hb'\~~~~duQLQ~~~-v-'\_\,__l~---__ 1 '(L~~-E-~cQ b-co~\_;~-v,c~vYtCh,Y-C,j ._cor~~' _ Rv-J Al ~ I ( r nu I £ ~ r c. + I YVi c.-, • u "r o ---------I (} J\\J1\ ClN GVt1_l:zdo --------------(11'/) '/Gf 3 --~ lf'f O Fred A~?t'lol/1001« -"ft ___ lrtd~ L!J_Ea/IJo c i:~"l ~~\ , C ~1JL o,_~~-S\_~1:L.C_.----·----·-9raa 9o9-~~3-4\4{ c-----·----~°"'"~-i·-K\~"\:~r e cicrt ' c~. ~\/ ----··--·-----~---------------·--------------·--·--~ ------·-----------------·~---·--·-----·-·-·-----------··--·-·-·------------------------·--·~--------
MINUTES
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
MINUTES
Monday, November 18, 2013
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC) was called to order at 10:00 a.m. at the Riverside County Transportation
Commission, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA.
2. SELF -INTRODUCTIONS
Members Present: Ahmad Ansari, City of Moreno Valley
Dave Barakian, City of Palm Springs
Armando Baldizzone, City of Blythe
Mark Diercks, City of Palm Desert
Grant Eklund, City of Indio
Jonathan Hoy, City of Coachella
Kevin Hughes, City of Beaumont
Prem Kumar, City of Moreno Valley
Lorelle Moe -Luna, Riverside Transit Agency
Bob Moehling, City of Murrieta
Farshid Mohammadi, City of Riverside
Victor Monz, City of Hemet
Habib Motlagh, Cities of Canyon Lake, Perris, and San Jacinto
Robert Morin, City of Corona
Kahono Oei, City of Banning
Ken Seumalo, City of Indian Wells
Michael Shoberg, CVAG
Bill Simons, City of Cathedral City
Roy Stephenson, City ofJurupa Valley
Michael Thornton, City of Calimesa
Others Present:
Grace Alvarez, RCTC
Randy Anstine, City of Calimesa
Ruben Castaneda, City of Eastvale
Eric DeHate, RCTC
Shirley Gooding, RCTC
Jillian Guizado, RCTC
Leif Lovegren, Riverside Transit Agency
Eric Lewis, City of Moreno Valley
Rafael Martinez, City of Menifee
Shirley Medina, RCTC
Nelson Nelson, City of Corona
Roy Null, County of Riverside
Eliza Yu, RCTC
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
November 18, 2013
Page 2
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes were approved as submitted.
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
5. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION CHANGES
Jillian Guizado, RCTC, reported that at the June 2013 Budget and Implementation Committee
meeting, the FY 2013/14 SB 821 list of projects was approved. There were concerns over bike
projects being adversely affected by the current evaluation criteria, environmental justice concerns,
and the east/west balance. The evaluation criteria were last updated in 1995. A subcommittee of
15 TAC volunteers was formed to review the SB 821 program. On November 7, the subcommittee
convened with 8 of the volunteers. The subcommittee recommended changing the annual call for
SB 821 projects to a bi-annual call. The first call would be released the first Monday of February and
close the last Thursday of April. Whatever funds were received the first fiscal year would be
combined with the funds from the year the call is released, resulting in two years of LTF.
She responded to various questions and reported that the next subcommittee meeting will be after
the next TAC meeting on January 27, 2014.
M/S/C (Motlagh/Moehling) to approve the bi-annual call for projects
6. 2015 FTIP UPDATE
Eric DeHate, RCTC, provided an update on the 2015 FTIP. He thanked the agencies that turned in
their FTIP sheets and reminded the TAC that the FTIP sheets for review were sent out on August 28
and August 29. Many agencies responded with markups to current FTIP sheets by September 30.
He further stated that new project sheets were due October 7 and to date there are seven agencies
that have not submitted their markups for inclusion in the 2015 FTIP. They may have submitted
state highway projects, but may have forgotten to submit local highway projects or vice versa. In
order to make changes to projects in the 2015 FTIP, changes must be made by close of business
Monday, November 25. He further stated that projects submitted after that date will be carried
over as they are. He reminded the TAC that any new projects that need to be added due to the
Multi -Funding Call for projects will be added by RCTC staff after the ranking is completed.
Mr. DeHate said that the FTIP update is an important process that ensures projects do not
encounter delays during the transition from the expiring FTIP and the new FTIP. He encouraged the
TAC to see him following the meeting if they have any questions or concerns.
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
November 18, 2013
Page 3
7. MULTI -FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS
- Status of STP and MARA Evaluations
- Draft CMAQ/TAP Recommendations
Shirley Medina, RCTC, provided a draft CMAQ/TAP recommendation spreadsheet and reported that
there was enough CMAQ money available to fund the projects that qualified for CMAQ including the
Commission's SR-60 truck climbing lane project. The TAP program is from MAP-21 and is a
restructure of the TE program and also eliminates some project categories. The Governor has his
own program called the Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) that focuses on bicycle and
pedestrian facilities. The California Transportation Commission is expected to come out with its
draft ATP guidelines December 11. Interim CMAQ guidelines came out last week.
There are three projects that requested design money. This call is for PA&ED or construction. Right
of way was only to be considered on a case -by -case basis, e.g. bicycle lane projects that might need
a few more feet.
Ms Medina highlighted some of the projects and said staff will meet with various cities to discuss
their projects.
RCTC's consultant will provide the air quality and cost benefit and consistency with RTP/SCS scored.
The consultant requires more information from some agencies regarding their applications and will
send a list of the missing data so he can perform the calculations.
She also pointed out that the Corona Foothill Parkway project scored 29 points and received special
consideration since it is already out to bid and the low bid extended the bid deadline, which will
expire December 22. The evaluation committee felt strongly about moving forward with the
recommendation for regional arterial funds. The Western Riverside County Programs and Projects
Committee will have an agenda item approving MARA funds for this project on November 25. The
rest of the recommendations will go to the Commission in January 2014.
Ms. Medina said there will be another evaluation committee meeting either December 9 or
December 16 to complete the scoring.
8. LOCAL ASSISTANCE UPDATE
There was no update.
9. NOVEMBER COMMISSION MEETING HIGHLIGHTS
Ms. Medina reported that the Commission meeting mainly consisted of the SB 821 item and many
Resolutions of Necessity regarding the 91 CIP.
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
November 18, 2013
Page 4
10. OTHER BUSINESS
Due to the TAC Vice Chair replacing the Chair who is no longer a representative, the TAC
unanimously nominated and elected Habib Motlagh, cities of Canyon Lake, Perris, and San Jacinto,
Vice Chair effective January 2014.
11. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee, the
meeting adjourned at approximately 10:47 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Shirley Medina
Planning and Programming Director
AGENDA ITEM 5
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 27, 2014
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager
Eric DeHate, Staff Analyst
SUBJECT:
2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
2013 FTIP
On September 16, 2013 RCTC staff presented updates to the 2013 FTIP and reported the
approval of the 2013 FTIP federal conformity, as well as approvals for Formal Amendment
No's. 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11 and 13 and Administrative Modification No's. 2, 5, 8, 10 and 12.
Since then, one additional Formal Amendment and two additional Administrative
Modifications have been submitted and approved. Currently, RCTC has participated in 15 out
of the 16 amendments encompassing changes to 218 projects.
As noted on the 2013 FTIP Amendment Log Approval (attached), all current Formal
Amendments and current Administrative Modifications have been approved. The following
table is the schedule of upcoming Formal Amendments and Administrative Modifications up
to October 2014. After October 2014, it is anticipated the 2015 FTIP will be approved.
2013 FTIP Amendment/Administrative Modification Schedule
Due to RCTC
Due to SCAG
Amendment/Administrative
Modification No.
Formal or Administrative
2/14/2014
2/25/2014
13-17
Formal
4/22/2014
4/29/2014
13-18
Administrative
6/17/2014
6/24/2014
13-19
Formal
7/22/2014
7/29/2014
13-20
Administrative
8/19/2014
8/26/2014
13-21
Formal
9/23/2014
9/30/2014
13-22
Administrative
10/21 /2014
10/28/2014
13 -23
Formal
Attachment: 2013 FTIP Amendment Log
2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program - Amendment Submittals and Approval Dates
2013 FTIP
Purpose
No. of Projects
Due to RCTC
Due to SCAG
Anticipated Approval
Final Approval
Final
12/13/2012
Amendment 1
Formal Amendment
53
10/8/2012
10/22/2012
1/31/2013
1/24/2013
Amendment
Administrative Modification
23
11/19/2012
11/27/2012
12/15/2013
12/19/2012
Amendment 3
Formal Amendment
14
12/17/2012
1/8/2013
3/15/2013
3/13/2013
RTP Consistency
Amendment/Amendment 4
Formal Amendment
1
1/9/2013
1/14/2013
6/30/2013
Amendment 5
Administrative Modification
15
1/24/2013
2/5/2013
2/28/2013
2/21/2013
Amendment 6
Formal Amendment
8
2/25/2013
3/5/2013
4/30/2013
4/18/2013
Amendment 7'
Formal Amendment
2/27/2013
4/30/2013
3/22/2013
Amendment 8
Administrative Modification
15
4/1/2013
4/9/2013
4/30/2013
4/25/2013
Amendment 9
Formal Amendment
15
4/29/2013
5/7/2013
6/21/2013
6/27/2013
Amendment 10
Administrative Modification
4
5/28/2013
6/4/2013
6/28/2013
6/25/2013
Amendment 11
Formal Amendment
10
6/27/2013
7/2/2013
8/23/2013
9/5/2013
Amendment 12
Administrative Modification
6
7/24/2013
7/31/2013
8/30/2013
8/22/2013
Amendment 13
Formal Amendment
28
8/23/2013
9/3/2013
10/25/2013
11/5/2013
Amendment 14
Administrative Modification
2
9/24/2013
10/1/2013
10/25/2013
10/23/2013
Amendment 15
Formal Amendment
5
10/22/2013
10/29/2013
12/18/2013
12/18/2013
Amendment 16
Administrative Modification
19
11/25/2013
12/3/2013
12/26/2013
12/30/2013
Total Number of Projects
218
'ROTC did not participate in this Amendment
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of January 21, 2014
1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 1 of 32
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1
October 2012
RCTC
aur.... —:--
IMMX.10ro3t1410
COW, mer
FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
CALTRANS
RIVLS01
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP COLLISION REDUCTION
PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 -
RR/HY CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC
W
CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS
AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMNT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING
IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS
Cost Increase (EA: 0M420 added to FY 2012/2013, OP280 added
to FY 2013/2014, OR740 added to FY 2014/2015).
CALTRANS
RIVLS09
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP MANDATES PROGRAM:
PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 - RR/HWY
CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC CNTRL
DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS AT
INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMNT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING
IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS
New Project- EA: OU310
City of Riverside
RIV120801
IN RIVERSIDE FOR RIVERSIDE SPECIAL SERVICES - CAPITALIZED PREVENTATIVE
MAINTENANCE (FY 12 - 5307) (UZA: RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for the City of Riverside
City of Riverside
RIV120802
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RIVERSIDE SPECIAL SERVICES - LEASE OF XEROX
MACHINE TO SUPPORT TRANSIT DIVISION NEEDS, PER APPROVED 2012/2013 SRTP -
TABLE 4, PROJECT NO. FY 13-4 (FY 13 - 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for the City of Riverside
COACHELLA
RIV061159
AT SR86/Avenue 50: Widen and construct new 6 through lane IC from E/O Coachella Stormwater
Channel Bridge to E/O Tyler St. Improvements include: extended ramp acceleration/deceleration
lanes, relocate/realign Ave 50 and Tyler St, bike lanes, sidewalks, and reconstruct traffic signals
(SAFETEA-LU 1702, CA 583, #2543) (EA: 0C970).
Cost decrease based on revised engineer's estimate and schedule
delay, per current PA&ED start phase.
COACHELLA
RIV071246
In the City of Coachella - Construct new (Non -capacity) Ave 52 Grade Separation overhead
structure spanning over UPRR mainline tracks and Grapefruit Blvd/Hwy 111, from Shady Ln to
approx 600' E/O Industrial Way/Tyler St. Improvements incl: Reconfig connection from Ave 52 to
Grapefruit Blvd/Hwy 111, bike Ins, sidewalks, retaining walls, reconst traffic sigs/driveways, remove
existing at -grade crossing.
Reprogramming of funding mainly needed to utilize CITY funding
for R/W and increase CMAQ in construction.
Minor project description made to correct the problem in the
database with ft (" instead of') - abbreviation to the crossing at the
end of the project description was needed to stay within the
character limitation.
Additionally, Sec 125 Surface Transportation Priorities funding was
deleted and FFY 2009 Appropriation Earmark added to clarify the
earmark appropriation in 2009 (Public Law 111-8).
Corona
RIV010209
In the City of Corona - Construct Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension 4 lane road from Lincoln Ave
to Paseo Grande (Approx 2.5 miles)
Cost decrease based on current engineer's estimate and minor
schedule delay that does not impact the model (2014).
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM
Page 2 of 32
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1
October 2012
RCTC
Min"""----,
twobeGoverkmptelerkatimmer
FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Corona
RIV011240
In Corona on existing McKinley St - Construct grade separation at BNSF Railroad crossing (project
study report & preliminary environmental analysis report activities).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years
JAG
RIV090102
In the Coachella Valley PM-10 Progra - Clean Vehicle Acquisition Program: Fleet acquisition of
alternative fuel sweepers for regional street sweeping program of major arterials, for the reduction of
PM10 fugitive dust throughout the Coachella Valley ($229 toll credits used to match CMAQ in const).
Reprogram funding from FY 2013/2014 to FY 2014/20/5
Desert Hot Springs
RIV061161
Essential road improvements - Phase III: City Section 31 including pavement rehab, sidewalks,
curb/gutters, cross gutters, ADA ramps & drainage improvements on Ramona Dr., Cactus Dr., El
Cajon Dr., La Mesa Dr., Caliente Dr. (Bunch Palms Tr to Hacienda Ave); and Hacienda Ave &
Ironwood Dr (Palm Dr to Ramona Dr).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years
Indio
RIV121102
In Eastern Riverside County in the City of Indio - Monroe Street Widening: Widening of Monroe St
between Ave. 49 and Ave. 52 (Approx. 7,800 L.F.), from 2 through lanes to 4 through lanes (2 lanes
in ea dir), including bike lane, sidewalk, traffic signal install at Ave. 49 and relocation of signal poles
and appurtenances at Ave. 50.
NEW SLPP Formula Funds project
Indio
RIV110831
In the City of Indio - Widen Jefferson St. from Varner Rd to Sun City Blvd from 4 to 6 lanes and
widen Varner Rd from 2 to 4 lanes from Jefferson St to approx. 500' East of Jefferson St and then
tapering back to 2 lanes. Ind medians, traffic signals, channelization, left -turn pockets, ded rt turn
lanes on SB Jefferson and EB Varner, drainage improvemetns, sidewalks, and bike lanes.
Cost Change &Schedule Delay
SLPP formula funds project
�a Qu'.nta
RIV121101
In Eastern Riverside County in the City of La Quinta - Intersection Improvements: Modify the
intersection at Hwy 111 and Washington St by adding left turn lanes, right turn lanes, median
modifications, res-striping, reconstruction of curb and gutter, signal and signal pole modifications,
and replacement of bus turnout.
NEW SLPP Formula Funds project
MURRIETA
RIV100106
In SW Riverside County - I-15/Los Alamos Rd. Bridge Replacement & Widening: Replacement of
existing two lane overcrossing at Los Alamos Rd. and Interstate 15 with a four lane overcrossing
(gap closure), bringing the bridge vertical clearance to Caltrans Standards.
Cost Change and Schedule Delay
SLPP formula funded project
Palm Desert
RIV071243
In the City of Palm Desert - Free right turn lane-WB Fred Waring Dr to NB Hwy 111: Reconfiguration
of a free right turn lane at the intersection from West Bound Fred Waring Dr to north bound Hwy 111
($61 toll credits used to match CMAQ in construction).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years
Palm Desert
RIV071255
In the City of Palm Desert - Mid Valley Bike Path: Construct a 6.5 mile class 1 Bike Path along the
northern city limits between S/O Washington St. and N/O Monterey Ave.
Schedule Delay
Palm Desert
RIV031208
At I-10/Monterey Ave IC - Reconfigure IC: Construct new WB entry ramp and realign/relocate WB
exit ramp (EA: OF050),
New project in the 2013 FTIP quadrennial years & Reprogramming
of funds
Palo Verde Valley
Transit Agency
RIV120803
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR PALO VERDE TRANSIT AGENCY - OPERATING
ASSISTANCE: FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A -RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR
2012/2013 (UZA: PALO VERDE).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Palo Verde Valley
Transit Agency
RCTC
RIV120201
On SR-60 near Beaumont: Construct new eastbound and westbound truck lanes from Gilman
Springs Rd to 1.6 miles west of Jack Rabbit Trail (EA: ON690) ($746 toll credits used to match
CMAQ in PA&ED).
Description change to combine RCTC's truck climbing lane with
Caltrans SHOPP Safety Improvements per agreement between
RCTC and Caltrans
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM
Page 3 of 32
ROTC
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1 was Nam —
October 2012
FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
RCTC
RIV520109
Reconstruct & Upgrade San Jacinto Branch Line for rail passenger service (Riverside to Perris)
(Perris Valley Line) (FY 07 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN).
Cost increase and adjustment to toll credit utilization in project
description.
PTA -RIP funding replaced with Surface Transportation Program -
RIP (federal), per CTC.
Riverside
RIV110116
In Riverside - Quiet Zone X-ing Improvements: Upgrade of 14 at -grade Hwy rail X-ing & one
pedestrian only at -grade X-ing along the BNSF San Bernardino Subd. & one at -grade Hwy -rail X-ing
along the UPRR Los Angeles Subd w/in the city of Riverside. The improvements are needed to
optimize safety at the X-ings and allow for quiet zone to mitigate existing and projected train horn
noise impacts.
Description change -grade crossings reduced from 14 to 11 based
on current conditions
Riverside County
RIV060123
In Northwest Riverside County on Clay St from approx. 100' SW of General Dr. to approx. 500' N/O
Linares Ave: Replace existing 4-lane (2 Ins in each direction) at grade R/R X-ing with a 4-Ln (2 Lns
in each direction -non-capacity) undercrossing (UPRR).
Cost decrease based on current engineers estimate and minor
schedule delay.
CMAQ funds will be obligated in FY 2012/2013, utililzing the EPSP.
Riverside County
RIV031202
I-10 Bypass South: Construct two lanes of roadway to provide a by-pass/network facility for the 1-10,
approx. 1/2 mile S/O 1-10 between the eastern end of the City of Banning and Apache Trail in
Cabazon. Other improvements include the construction of several low-water crossings at Smith
Creek and San Gorgonio River (PA&ED).
Cost Increase based on the latest engineer's estimate & Schedule
Advance
Riverside County
RIV060124
In Banning on Sunset Ave at 1-10 from s/o Ramsey St to s/o Lincoln St: Lower Sunset Ave to
construct new 4-lane UC at UPRR crossing (non -capacity) and reconstruct the 1-10 IC ramps to
meet the new street grade (SAFETEA CA438, #1261+ HR4818+HR3058) (EA:33471)
Cost Increase per latest TCIF baseline agreement &minor
schedule advance.
Riverside County
RIV011233
At I-15/Limonite Ave IC - Widen IC 4 to 6 Lns, widen NB and SB exit ramps 1 to 2 Ins, add 2 lane
loop ramps in the NB and SB directions & widen Limonite Ave from Hamner to Wineville 4 to 6 Lns
(approx 1 mi) (EA: 0E1050K).
New project in the 2013 FTIP quadrennial years &Reprogramming
of funds
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV091211
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - VEHICLE REPLACEMENT: PURCHASE FIFTY
(50) REPLACEMENT HEAVY DUTY CNG REVENUE VEHICLE ROLLING STOCK (FEDERAL
APPROPRIATION THROUGH HR 3288, FFY 2009/2010 - FTA 5309).
Description Change -FTIP project converted to Lump Sum Listing
per 2011 FTIP Guidelines, Grouped Project Listing Category 58
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120819
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - REVENUE VEHICLES FOR CONTRACTED OPERATIONS:
PURCHASE OF SEVEN (7) MID -SIZE VEHICLES, REPLACING TYPE II VEHICLES THAT HAVE
REACHED THEIR SERVICE LIFE PER FTA GUIDELINES. REPLACEMENT VEHICLES WILL BE
USED FOR CONTRACT OPERATED FIXED ROUTE SERVICE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-
SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency -Project No. FY13-2
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120822
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED COST OF TIRE LEASE (FTA 5307 - FY 13)
(UZA:RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Tra-s.
Agency - Project No. FY13-5
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120825
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA- INFORMATION SYSTEMS: PURCHASE OF COMPUTERS
AND SOFTWARE SYSTEM FOR FIXED ROUTE VEHICLES, HEMET TRAINING ROOM
EQUIPMENT, AND RIVERSIDE CONFERENCE ROOM MONITORS - NON ITS COMPONENTS
(FTA 5307 - FY13) (UZA: RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency - Project No. FY13-8
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
" 121 /2014 - 11:29 AM
Page 4 of 32
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1" "'..
IN.,* CeNR, LenJpxb�M(*m or
October 2012
FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120826
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - OPERATING ASSISTANCE: FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A-
RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA:
HEMET).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency -Project No. FY13-8.
Project funding includes prior ears carry
� g � p y overs.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120827
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED PREVENTATIVE ; 'ZITENANCE FOR FY
12-13 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB, TEM/MURR/MEN).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120828
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - CAPITAL COST OF CONTRACTING FOR FY 12-13 (FTA
5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120820
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - SUPPORT VEHICLE: PURCHASE OF ONE (1) VEHICLE
TO REPLACE A VEHICLE THAT HAS MET ITS USEFUL LIFE REQUIREMENT (FTA 5307 - FY 13)
(UZA: RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency - Project No. FY13-3
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120821
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA- CAPITAL MAINTENANCE SPARES: PURCHASE OF
SPARE PARTS FOR ROLLING STOCK UNDER THE BUS MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (FTA 5307
- FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Trans'.t
Agency - Project No. FY13-4
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120823
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - TRANSIT ENHANCEMENTS: PURCHASE AND
INSTALLATION OF TRANSIT ENHANCEMENTS FOR BUS STOP SYSTEM SUCH AS
INSTALLATION OF BUS SHELTERS AND BENCHES, KIOSKS, SIGNAGE, AND LIGHTING TO
ENHANCE SECURITY AND SAFETY OF THE RIDING PUBLIC (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency - Project No. FY13-6
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120824
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - SUPPORT EQUIPMENT: PURCHASE OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE
(E.G., VEHICLE JACKS, WHEELCHAIRS FOR OPERATOR TRAINING, POINJAR, AIR
COMPRESSORS/GENERATORS, AND FLOOR SCRUBBERS) (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency - Project No. FY13-7
SAN JACINTO
RIV111129
In San Jacinto — Ramona Exp Widening PH 1: Ramona Exp. Widening of 2 and 4 lanes to 6 lanes
regional arterial (3 in each direction) between Sanderson & Eagle Rd., including left -turn or
landscape median, drainage improvement, relocation of traffic signal poles and installation of curb
and gutter. Exist configuration varies from 2 and 4 lanes - widening will be from 2 to 6 and 4 to 6
Lanes.
Cost Increase based on the latest engineer's estimate &minor
schedule advance
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV110407
In the Coachella Valley for SunLine Transit Agency - Job Access & Reverse Commute and New
Freedom Project: Express Service to the Pass area with service to Banning and Beaumont,
connecting Coachella Valley commuters to Western Riverside County (FTA 5316 and FTA 5317,
FYs 09 and 10).
project description change to include additional stops in Cabazon,
Moreno Valley, and Riverside; Conformity Category changed from
Exempt-93.126 to .
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120804
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A -RIDE
OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120805
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - CAPITALIZED PREVENTATIVE
MAINTENANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM
Page 5 of 32
RCM
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1 Mit�'
•rr**uaa z..�mor
October 2012
FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120806
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY: REHABILITATION OF SUNLINE'S
FLEET OF OLDER BUSES, INCLUDING RESTORATION OF COLORS ON BOTH THE INTERIOR
AND EXTERIOR, AND PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT NEEDED TO REPAIR/REHAB BUSES (FY
13 - 5307) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
- Project No. SL 13-01.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120807
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE TWO REPLACEMENT
SERVICE TRUCKS AND FOUR REPLACEMENT CNG RELIEF CARS (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA:
INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
_project No. SL 13-02.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120808
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS:
REPAVE THE EXISTING BUS YARD AND STAFF PARKING AREA AT THE THOUSAND PALMS
OPERATING FACILITY (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
_project No. SL 13-03.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120809
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE TRANSIT STOP
ENHANCEMENTS FOR CONTINUED IMPROVEMENTS TO BUS STOPS FOR THE SAFETY AND
COMFORT OF PASSENGERS, PER COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDATION (CA PROP 1 B SECURITY FUNDED PROJECT).
..
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for S-_°ne Transit Agency
- Project No. SL 13-04.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120810
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS:
IMPROVE THE THOUSAND PALMS AND INDIO FACILITIES, INCLUDING ROOF REPAIR AND
REPLACEMENT, NEW CARPETING AND BLINDS, AND REPAIR OF PARKING FACILITIES FOR
STAFF USE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
- Project No. SL 13-05.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120811
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FURNITURE REPLACEMENT:
PURCHASE OF OFFICE FURNITURE TO REPLACE AND ADD FURNITURE REACHES THE
END OF ITS CYCLE LIFE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
_project No. SL 13-06.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120812
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE OF VARIOUS IT
EQUIPMENT, SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR EXISTING AGENCY SYSTEM NEEDS AND
TO STREAMLINE OPERATIONS AND PRODUCE REPORTS FOR SUNLINE SERVICES (FTA
5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
- Project No. SL 13-07.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120813
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE NEW MODERN,
STATE OF THE ART TELEPHONE SYSTEM, IMPROVING THE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR
SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
_Project No. SL 13-08.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120814
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE FIVE (5) NEW SPARE
FAREBOXES TO ALLOW EXISTING UNITS TO BE REPAIRED WITHOUT BUS SERVICE
INTERRUPTION (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
_Project No. SL 13-09.
SunLine Transit
Agercy
RIV120815
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - CONDUCT A SAMPLE SURVEY
OF SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIDERS, PROVIDING USEFUL INFORMATION TO SUPPORT
SUNLINE PLANNING AND MARKETING EFFORTS. SURVEY WILL ALSO INCLUDE NTD
SECTION 15 RIDECHECKS (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
- Project No. SL 13-10.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120816
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE MAJOR
REPLACEMENT MAINTENANCE TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT FOR ROUTINE VEHICLE
MAINTENANCE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
_project No. SL 13-11.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120817
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - SPECIAL FUEL PROVISION
ALLOWING A PORTION OF AGENCY FUEL COSTS TO BE TREATED AS A CAPITAL
MAINTENANCE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
_project No. SL 13-12.
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM
Page 6 of 32
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1
October 2012
FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120829
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - SOLAR PANEL REPLACEMENT:
REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING SOLAR PANELS, PROVING 33 PERCENT OF SUNLINE ENERGY
NEEDS FOR OPERATING OFFICES AND FACILITIES (PROJECT FUNDED BY FY 12 STATE OF
GOOD REPAIR, BUS LIVABILITY AND TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit
Agency.
Number of Projects
53
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of January 21, 2014
1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 7 or 32
2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 2
November 2012
SCAG approval: Dec. 19, 2012
•v.r:(...F Ipsir.m�
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Beaumont
RIV100102
In Western Riverside Co in Beaumont: SR79 Bypass Ext No. Ph II - Instal of a 3-Ln pre-fab bridges
on the eastside of the Ph 1 Potrero Bridge SR79 Bypass Ext. No., extending the Potrero Blvd 0.675
mi. No. from the future SR60/Potrero Fwy IC (RIV050535), to connect to the Oak Valley Pkwy in
Beaumont, including the instal of a Class !multi -purpose trail, flared intersection and tuming pockets.
Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP
Cathedral City
RIV070302
In Eastern Riverside County in the Coachella Valley - Date Palm Dr Bridge ReplacementNVidening:
Replacement of a two lane (1 In in ea dir) low water crossing bridge over Long Canyon Creek (Bridge
No. 00L0043) with a six lane (3 Ins in ea dir), for approximately 350 ft. (from Varner Rd. to 350' S/O
Varner Rd).
Reprogramming cf funding years per HBP update of 10/29/2012.
Cathedral City
RIV091011
In Eastern Riverside County in the Coachella Valley - Date Palm Dr over the Whitewater River:
Widening of Date Palm Dr from 4 to 6 Ins (3 Ins in ea dir), from approx. 350 Ft S/O the bridge to 250
Ft N/O the bridge (Via Estrada to the north and Perez Rd. to the south), including the construction of
a raised median and sidewalk along the east side of the project (Bridge No. 56C0189).
Cost increase per HBP funding update of 10/29/2012.
Indio
RIV111202
In the City of Indio - Ave 44 Bridge Replacement: Replace existing Avenue 44 two lane low water
crossing over the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel with a four lane bridge (Bridge No. O0L0056),
including 6 ft sidewalk on each side of the bridge.
Reprogramming of Engineering funding years per HBP funding
update of 10/29/2012.
Lake Elsinore
RIV111203
In Lake Elsinore - Temescal Canyon Rd. Bridge Replacement/Widening: Replace Temescal Canyon
Rd. 2 lane bridge with a 4-lane bridge over Temescal Wash, 0.22 mi. W/O Lake Street (Bridge No.
56C0050).
Reprogramming of HBP per 10/29/2012 update.
Lake Elsinore
RIV091007
In mid -Western Riverside County in the City of Lake Elsinore: Widening of SR-74 from 2 to 4 through
lanes (2 lanes in each direction), west of 1-15 to the Ortega Mountains. Other improvements include
turn pockets and one traffic signal.
Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP
Moreno Valley
In Western Riverside County in the City of Moreno Valley - Eucalyptus Ave. Widening/Extension:
RIV091003 Construction of a 4th through lane in the eastern direction from Redlands Blvd. to Theodore St &
Extension of Eucalyptus Ave. to Redlands Blvd., with a signalized intersection.
Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP
Moreno Valley
RIV091004
In Western Riverside Co. in the City of Moreno Valley - Cactus Ave Widening: Widen Cactus Ave
from 2 to 4 through lanes (2 in ea dir), from Lasselle St to Nason St. Other improvements include the
installation of a dedicated right turn lane, a 2-way left turn lane, bus turn -outs, landscaping &
sidewalks.
Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP
Palm Springs
RIV110124
In the Coachella Valley in the city of Palm Springs - Ramon Rd. Widening between San Luis Rey Dr &
Landau Blvd: Widening of Ramon Rd. from a 4-Ln arterial to a 6-Ln arterial (3-Lns in ea dir) between
San Luis Rey Dr & Landau Blvd., including the widening/replacement of the Whitewater River Bridge
(Bridge No. 56CO287), including seismic retrofit and scour countermeasures as necessary.
Reprogramming of HBP per 10/29/2012 update.
Palm Springs
RIV990727
In Palm Springs: Widen Indian Canyon Dr from 2 to 6 lanes (3 in each direction), from UPRR
overcrossing to Garnet Ave (HBRR#:5600025).
Cost decrease per HBP funding update of 10/29/2012
Palm Springs
RIV090405
In the City of Palm Springs: Replace existing 4-lane low water crossing on Vista Chino at Whitewater
River with a new 4-lane bridge - bridge No. 00L0052.
Reprogramming of HBP per 10/29/2012 update & Technical
change, correcting RTP ID to be consistent with the 2012 RTP.
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM
Page 8 of 32
2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 2
November 2012
SCAG approval: Dec. 19, 2012
lam mos
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Palm Springs
RIV031206
On S. Palm Canyon Dr. over Arenas Canyon South Drainage Channel: Replace existing 4 lane low-
water crossing with a new 4-lane bridge, including drainage improvements consisting of levee
channelization (HBRR #: OOL0027).
Cost increase per HBP funding update of 10/29/2012.
Rancho Mirage
RIV110130
In Coachella Valley in Rancho Mirage - Widening of south bound Monterey Ave. from 2 to 3 lanes
from Dinah Shore Dr to Gerald Ford Dr. (Approx. 3,480 L.F.). Other improvements include
installation of curb and gutter, drainage improvements (retention basins), signing and striping, and
traffic signal modification at Ginger Rogers Rd.
Schedule Delay per latest project milestone report from the City of
Rancho Mirage
RCTC
RIV041047
Throughout Riverside County - Grouped Projects for Transportation Enhancement Activities -
Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories - Transportation
Enhancement Activities (Except Rehabilitation and Operation of Historic Transportation Buildings,
structures, or facilities). $398 in toll credits will be utilized for STPL match for cons in FY 2012/2013.
Reprogramming of funds to re-establish the STIP STP-ENHANCE-
RIP TEA funds, per RCTC discretion for utilization of TE reserve
funds prior to June 30, 2013.
TC utilization per Abijit Badge memo dated 12/12/2011.
RCTC
RIV050517
On SR74 in/near Hemet from Calvert Ave to California Ave: curve, median, & pavement widening
(non -capacity) (EA ON3600).
Cost increase and schedule delay per latest cost estimate
RCTC
RIV070308
At SR91/71 Jct: Replace EB 91 to NB 71 connector w/direct fly -over connector, and reconstruct the
Green River Rd EB on -ramp (EA: OF541) ($1,501/$639/$200 toll credits will be used in PS&E to
match DEMO-SAFETEALU/DEMO-TEA21/STP, respectively. $159 toll credits will be used in RAN to
match DEMO-SAFETEALU.)
Cost increase to include Surface Transportation Program - HR
4818 (idle earmark) for the r/w phase.
RCTC
RIV071250
On SR91/1-15: SR91 - Cons 1 MF Ln (SR71-115)/1 Aux Ln var locs (SR241-Pierce) (OC PM 14.43-
1891), CD System (2/3/4 Lns main-115), 1 toll Expr Ln (te1) & convert HOV to Tel ea dir (0C-115); 1-15-meeting
const tel med dir connct NB15 to WB91 and EB91 to SB15, 1 tel ea dir SR91 dir connct-Ontario IC
(115 PM 37.56-42.94).
Cost increase /addition of Prop 1 B SLPP Formula Funds per CTC
of Dec. 5-6, 2012.
RCTC
RIV110122
On 1-215 in SW Riverside County from Murrieta Hot Springs Rd to 1-215/1-15 Junction, construct a
third mixed flow lane southbound (widens 1-215/1-15 connector from 2 to 3 lanes).
Technical Change to correctly include the PM miles before and
after construction for signage and restriping through consultation
with Caltrans.
New PM pos miles are based on the agreed project construction
foot print with Caltrans.
RCTC
RIV090902
On Interstate 215, from Blaine St SB off -ramp to 0.3 miles south of Martin Luther King Blvd
Undercrossing(PM 40.2 to PM 42.5), extend the existing SB lane # 4 (lane drop) to 0.3 miles south of
Martin Luther King Blvd undercrossing (EA ON890) ($230 toll credits used to match STPL in cons)
Schedule Advance per current bid advertisement
Riverside County
RIV071259
In Eastern Coachella Valley - Mecca Community Roundabout: Construct a roundabout entry to the
unincorporated Mecca Comm. On Hammond Rd & 4th St btwn 5th & 3rd Streets, consisting of a
single In. traffic circle w/one bypass RT Ln for the SE traffic; mountable median aprons; landscaped
center; S/W & Ped. X-ing; landscape buffer; realignment of Hammond Rd.; and an entry monument.
Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP
Riverside County
RIV071285
In the Southeast Coachella Valley in Eastern Riverside County, just south of the City of Coachella on
Ave. 56 (Airport Blvd) - from Polk St to the west to Orange St. to the east of the R/R X-ing: Replace
existing 2 Ln (1 Ln in ea dir) at grade R/R X-ing with a 2 Ln OC (1 Ln in ea dir - non -capacity) across
the UPRR tracks.
Cost increase and schedule delay
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1 /21 /2014 - '11:29 AM
Page 9 of 32
2013 FTIP -Administrative Modification No. 2 �
November 2012"�-
SCAG approval: Dec. 19, 2012
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Riverside County
RIV111003
In Westem Riverside County in the city of Jurupa Valley - Market Street Bridge Replacement:
Replace the existing two lane (one lane in each direction) Market Street Bridge over the Santa Ana
River, 0.4 miles northwest of SR60 with a four lane (two lanes in each direction) bridge, Bridge No.
56C0024.
Reprogramming of HBP per 10/29/2012 update.
Riverside County
RIV100105
In Westem Riverside County - 1-15 at Indian Truck Trail IC: Widen Indian Truck Trail from 2 to 4
lanes, including dedicated left -turn lanes to NB and SB on ramp; widening of the SB exit ramp from 1
to 3 lanes; and widening of the NB exit ramp and entry ramp from 1 to 3 lanes plus intersection
improvements at Temescal Cyn Rd.
Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP
Number of Projects 23
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of January 21, 2014
1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 10 of 32
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 3 mow err ---.
January 2013 c...ttc0..,,.,,..o..,�.-f...�
FHWA approval: Mar. 13, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
CALTRANS
RIVLSI2
Grouped projects for emergency repair - SHOPP Emergency Response Program: Projects are
consistent w/40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 - Repair damage caused by natural disasters, civil
unrest, or terrorist acts. Applies to damages that do not qualify for fed emergency relief funds or to
damages that qualify for fed emergency relief funds but extend beyond the federally declared disaster
period.
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -Addition of EA
1 C780 to FY 2012/2013
Federal Lands
Highway Divison
RIV130101
REHABILITATE APPROXIMATELY 0.5 MILES OF THE PACIFIC COAST TRAIL - FULLERS RIDGE
TRAIL BETWEEN SEVEN PINES TRAIL AND DEER SPRINGS TRAIL IN MOUNT SAN JACINTO
STATE PARK. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITES INCLUDE BRUSHING AND CLEARING,
SWITCHBACKS, ARMORING, ROCK RETAINING WALLS, DRAINAGE LENSES, AND TRAIL
CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION (PART OF MAP-21 BILL).
New Project programmed at the request of State of California -
Natural Resources Agency -Dept of Parks and Recreation
Indio
RIV091208
IN COACHELLA VALLEY IN THE CITY OF INDIO - JACKSON ST TRAFFIC SIGNAL
INTERCONNECT AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALL: INSTALL A NEW TS AT JACKSON ST &
MARKET ST/DILLON AVE., & INSTALL. OF A WIRELESS INTERCONNECT SYSTEM ON
JACKSON ST BTWN AVE. 44 TO THE NO. & AVE. 45 TO THE SO., A DISTANCE OF APROX. 1
MILE. INTERCONNECT SYSTEM INCLUDES 2 EXIST. TS & 1 NEW TS ($38 TOLL CREDITS
USED FOR CMAQ MATCH IN CONS).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrenn'a: Yams
La Quinta
RIV121202
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA - ON DUNE PALMS RD:
REPLACE 3-LANE LOW WATER CROSSING WITH 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER THE COACHELLA
VALLEY STORMWATER CHANNEL ( WHITEWATER RIVER - BRIDGE NO.00L0070)
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -per 10/29/2012
HBP update
RCTC
RIV071250
On SR91/1-15: SR91 - Cons 1 MF Ln (SR71-115)/1 Aux Ln var locs (SR241-Pierce) (OC PM 14.43-
18.91), CD System (2/3/4 Lns main-115), 1 toll Expr Ln (tel) & convert HOV to Tel ea dir (0C-115); I-
15-const tel med dir connct NB15 to WB91 and EB91 to SB15, 1 tel ea dir SR91 dir connct-Ontario
IC (115 PM 37.56-42.94).
Cost increase to include latest cost estimate.
RCTC
RIV090601
REHABILITATION/RENOVATION OF METROLINK TRACK, SIGNALS, COMMUNICATIONS,
STRUCTURES, FACILITIES, SYSTEMS, & ROLLING STOCK. UTILIZATION OF TOLL
DEVELOPMENT CREDITS TO MATCH FTA 5307 & FTA5309(A) IN CONSTRUCTION IS AS
FOLLOWS: $245 IN FY 11 FOR FTA 5307 AND 5309(A); $251 IN FY 12 FOR FTA 5307; $502 IN
FY 13 FOR FTA 5309(A); AND $522 IN FY 14 FOR FTA 5309A.
Description change to clarify that rolling stock
rehabilitation/renovation includes replacement of locomotives with
Tier-4 technology and deprogramming of FTA 5309a FY's 13 and
14
Original
1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM
Page 11 of 32
RCM'
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 3 mow �---
January 2013
FHWA approval: Mar. 13, 2013 _
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Riverside
RIV071271
IN RIVERSIDE ON STREETER AVENUE: REPLACE EXISTING 4 LANE (2 LNS IN EA DIR) R/R X-
ING WITH A 4 LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) U.C. GRADE SEPARATION ON
STREETER AVE BETWEEN LANTANA ST AND BEATTY DR., AND INSTALL APPROX. 1,000 FT
OF PCC S/W ON EACH SIDE OF STREETER AVENUE WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS.
Cost decrease per latest engineer's estimate.
Riverside
RIV071272
IN RIVERSIDE ON RIVERSIDE AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4-LANE (2 LNS IN EA DIR) R/R/ X-ING
WITH A 4 LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) U.C. G. S. ALONG RIVERSIDE AVE BTWN
MERRILL AVE AND 400FT N/O ELIZABETH ST. ADD IMP INCLUDE INSTALLATION OF APPROX
1,100 FT OF PCC S/W ON EACH SIDE OF RIVERSIDE AVE WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS ($791
TC IN FY09/10 & $151 TC IN FY12/13 USED TO MATCH STPL IN R/W)
Cost increase per latest engineer's estimate
Riverside County
RIV121203
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY - ON AVE 56/AIRPORT DR,
REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER WHITEWATER RIVER .21 MILES E/O
HWY 111 (BRIDGE N0.56C0020).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -per 10/29/2012
HBP update
Riverside County
RIV121204
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE NEWLY INCORPORATED CITY OF EASTVALE - ON
HAMNER AVE OVER SANTA ANA RIVER .5 MILES N/O OF SIXTH STREET, REPLACE 2 LANE
BRIDGE WITH A 6 LANE BRIDGE (BRIDGE N0.56C0446).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years - per '.0/29/2012
HBP update
Temecula
991206
BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD EXTENSIONS: EXTEND MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS RD (4 LNS)
FROM BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD TO SERAPHINA RD; BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD (4 LNS) FROM
RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD TO MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS RD; & NICHOLAS RD (4 LNS) FROM
BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. TO CALLE GIRASOL
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -Cost increase
Temecula
RIV031215
Frech Valley Pkwy IC/Arterial Phases: Construct 6 Ln IC (Jefferson to Ynez) & ramps, NB/SB aux In,
CD Lns (3 Ins NB&SB) & modify Winchester Rd IC (1-215 PM: 8.43-9.75) (EA:43270).
Cost increase per latest engineer's estimate
Temecula
991202
French Valley Pkwy (FVP) Phase I: Design & Construct FVP 2 through lanes arterial westbound from
1-15 to Jefferson Ave, construct FVP SB exit ramp (1 lane), SB aux lane (from FVP IC to Winchester
Rd IC) & widen Winchester Rd IC SB exit ramp (1 to 3 Ins) (EA: 43270).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years and cost
decrease based on latest estimate
Various Agencies
RIV050201
IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY GROUPED PROJECTS FOR BRIDGE REHABILITATION AND
RECONSTRUCTION - HBP PROGRAM; PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 CATEGORIES - WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR
RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES (NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES). TC UTILIZATION: $649 IN
11/12 FOR CONS; $190 IN 12/13 FOR PE; $18 IN 15/16 FOR R/W; $2 IN 16/17 FOR R/W; $871 IN
16/17 FOR CONS; & $192 IN 17/18
Cost increase per 10/29/2012 HBP funding update.
Number of Projects
Original
14
1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM
As of January 21, 2014
Page 12 of 32
2013 FTIP - RTP Consistency Amendment No. 1/Amendment No. 4
January 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Riverside County
RIV110302
ON I-10 IN THE CITY OF BLYTHE - PROVIDE NEW W/B ON AND W/B OFF RAMPS TO HOBSON
WAY APPROX 1,800' W/O EXISTING RAMPS TO RIVIERA DR/INSPECTION STATION. THE
NEW RAMPS WILL REPLACE EXISTING CONNECTION TO RIVIERA DR.
Description change, Beginning PM Limits change, modeling
changes and reprogramming of funds.
Number of Projects
1 As of January 21, 2014
Original 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 13 of 32
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 5 Boa N..--
February 2013 ►c��
SCAG approval: Feb. 21, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Beaumont
RIV050535
ON SR60 BETWEEN JACK RABBIT TR & SR60/1-10 JCT: PH1-CONSTRUCT NEW POTRERO 6
LN OC (3 LNS EACH DIR) W/TEMP CONNECT TO WESTERN KNOLLS (EA34141). PH2: NEW IC
ON/OFF RAMPS. CONSTRUCT WB/EB EXIT & ENTRY RAMPS (2 LNS) & WB/EB LOOP ENTRY
RAMPS (2 LNS) (ENTRY RAMPS INCL HOV LANE), INCL EB/WB AUX LNS AT EXIT RAMPS,
REALIGN WESTERN KNOLLS AVE, AND REMOVE WESTERN KNOLLS AVE CONNECTION TO
SR60 (EA34142).
Cost Increase per latest cost estimate and incorporation of 2011
FTIP A-30 changes (2006 AAA Idle Earmark replaced with STPL)
and transfer of STPL (Formerly TE) from San Timoteo Canyon Bike
and Pedestrian Facilities to SR60/Potrero IC per TAC approval of
Dec 10, 2012
Caltrans
RIV120201
ON SR-60 NEAR BEAUMONT: CONSTRUCT NEW EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND TRUCK
LANES FROM GILMAN SPRINGS RD TO 1.6 MILES WEST OF JACK RABBIT TRAIL (EA:
ON690)AND UPGRADE EXISTING INSIDE AND OUTSIDE SHOULDER IN THE WB DIRECTION
TO STANDARD WIDTHS (5-FT INSIDE SHOULDER AND 10-FT OUTSIDE SHOULDER) (EA:
O0180).
Cost decrease to deprogram CMAQ PE funds -CMAQ PE funds
replaced (obligated) with idle earmarks on 12/10/2012.
Cost decrease needed to match Coop -Agreement.
Caltrans
RIVLS01
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP COLLISION REDUCTION
PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 -
RR/HY CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC
W
CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS
AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMNT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING
IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS
Cost Increase - EA ON510 increased and addition of new EA's
OR750 and OR950.
PERRIS
RIV011205
IN PERRIS - WIDEN PERRIS BLVD 2 TO 6 LANES FROM RAMONA EXPRESSWAY TO PERRIS
VALLEY STORM DRAIN - LATERAL'B'(APPROX. 1 MILE), INCLUDING CURB, GUTTER,
SIDEWALK, RAISED MEDIAN, SIGNAL WORK, UTILITY RELOCATIONS, AND MINOR DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS.
Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate and notificaton from
city of Perris regarding defederalizing the project.
RCTC
RIV041047
THROUGHOUT RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR TRANSPORTATION
ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126
EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT
ACTIVITIES (EXCEPT REHABILITATION AND OPERATION OF HISTORIC TRANSPORTATION
BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, OR FACILITIES). $236 IN TOLL CREDITS WILL BE UTILIZED TO
MATCH STPUSTP ENHANCE -RIP TEA CONS I
Cost Decrease to reflect the transfer from the San Timoteo Canyon
Bike and Pedestrian facilities to the SR60/Potrero IC per TAC
approval of Dec. 10, 2012.
RCTC
RIV520109
Reconstruct & Upgrade San Jacinto Branch Line for rail passenger service (Riverside to Perris)
(Perris Valley Line) (FY 07 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN) ($330 Toll Credits to match CMAQ in Cons FY
12/13: $865 toll credits to partially match CMAQ ($7,543) in cons FY 13/14; and $6,076 toll credits to
match STP-RIP in Cons FY 12/13).
Project not to utilize toll credits
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
RIV031202
1-10 BYPASS SOUTH: CONSTRUCT TWO LANES OF ROADWAY TO PROVIDE A BY-
PASS/NETWORK FACILITY FOR THE I-10, APPROX. 1/2 MILE S/O 1-10 BETWEEN THE
EASTERN END OF THE CITY OF BANNING AND APACHE TRAIL IN CABAZON. OTHER
IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEVERAL LOW-WATER CROSSINGS AT
SMITH CREEK AND SAN GORGONIO RIVER (PA&ED).
Description change to refer to the federal earmark for the Ramsey
St. Extension to meet the intent of the legislation for the project
funding.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
RIV060123
IN NORTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY ON CLAY ST FROM APPROX 100"SW OF GENERAL DR
TO APPROX 500" N/O LINARES AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4-LANE (2 LNS IN EACH DIRECTION)
AT GRADE R/R X-ING WITH A 4-LN (2 LNS IN EACH DIRECTION - NON -CAPACITY)
UNDERCROSSING (UPRR).
Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate.
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM
Page 14 of 32
2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 5
February 2013 Fws.:*C•an+x+�a�coP-�
SCAG approval: Feb. 21, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
RIV071278
IN NORTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY ON MAGNOLIA AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4 LANE (2 LNS
IN EA. DIR) R/R X-ING WITH A 4-LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) O.C. GRADE
SEPARATION ON MAGNOLIA AVE BTWN BUCHANAN AVE. (ON THE EAST) AND LINCOLN
STREET (ON THE WEST).
Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate. Due to Programming
Capacity issues, STPL will be obligated through the EPSP process.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
RIV071285
IN THE SOUTHEAST COACHELLA VALLEY IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, JUST SOUTH OF
THE CITY OF COACHELLA ON AVE. 56 (AIRPORT BLVD) - FROM POLK ST TO THE WEST TO
ORANGE ST. TO THE EAST OF THE R/R X-ING: REPLACE EXISTING 2 LN (1 LN IN EA DIR) AT
GRADE R/R X-ING WITH A 2 LN OC (1 LN IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) ACROSS THE UPRR
TRACKS.
Cost Increase per latest engineer's estimate.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
RIV060124
IN BANNING ON SUNSET AVE AT 1-10 FROM S/O RAMSEY ST TO S/O LINCOLN ST: LOWER
SUNSET AVE TO CONSTRUCT NEW 4-LANE UC AT UPRR CROSSING (NON -CAPACITY) AND
RECONSTRUCT THE 1-10 IC RAMPS TO MEET THE NEW STREET GRADE (SAFETEA-LU
CA438, #1261) (EA:33471)
Cost decrease and reprogramming of funds to reflect the latest
TCIF cost estimate and approved funding. Due to CMAQ capacity
issues, RCTC Programmed CMAQ AC in FY 14/15 utilizing LOCAL
AC
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV091211
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE
EXISTING VEHICLES OF THE FLEET: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND
RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET.
Cost Increase per approved 2012/2013 SRTP A-1, and inclusion of
new FTA 5308 grant funds.
TEMECULA
991203
EXTEND OVERLAND DRIVE (4 LANES) FROM COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE TO AVENIDA
ALVARADO/DIAZ ROAD INTERSECTION INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION OF 4 LANE BRIDGE
OVER MURRIETA CREEK
Description Change to include "To Be Implemented in Phases"
Reprogramming of design and construction from FY 2013/2014 to
FY 2014/2015. Add funds in FY 2012/2013 per City of Temecula's
request of 12/20/2012
TEMECULA
RIV060113
CONSTRUCT NEW 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER MURRIETA CREEK (PART OF WESTERN BYPASS
CORRIDOR) INCLUDING APPROACHES, CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, & STORM DRAIN
FACILITIES
Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate.
TEMECULA
RIV62029
AT HWY 79 SO AND LA PAZ ST: ACQUIRE LAND, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT PARK -AND -RIDE
LOT - 157 SPACES.
Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate.
Number of Projects 15
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM
As of January 21, 2014
Page 15 of 32
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 6
March 2013
ram. MOM
,.«�ac«Mr�oo..co^..�
FHWA approval: Apr. 18, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Beaumont
RIV060115
AT I-10/OAK VALLEY PKWY IC: RECONSTRUCT/WIDEN IC FROM 2 TO 6 THROUGH LANES
FROM APPROX 500' W/O DESERT LAWN DR TO GOLF CLUB DR, WIDEN RAMPS - EB ENTRY 1
TO 2 LANES, EB & WB EXIT 1 TO 4 LANES, WB ENTRY 1 TO 3 LANES, , ADD NEW EB/WB
ENTRY LOOP RAMPS (2 LANES) , ENTRY RAMPS INCLUDE HOV PREFERENTIAL LANE, AND
RAMPS INCLUDE EXTENDED ACCELERATION/DECELERATION LANE (EA: OG280).
Reprogramming of design, RNV and construction, per City of
Beaumont's request of 12/17/2012.
Completion year (model year) remains 2018.
Murrieta
RIV071277
ON 1-215 AT LOS ALAMOS RD IC - INSTALL LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS
TO THE I-215/LOS ALAMOS ROAD INTERCHANGE (SAFETEA-LU 2005 SEC. 1702. HPP #3140).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years.
PALM SPRINGS
RIV071258
IN THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS — TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CENTER: ADVANCE THE
INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL TIMING TO BE UNIFIED CITYWIDE, COORDINATE THE COMM.
EQUIP., BRINGING THEM ALL ONTO THE SAME COMM. PLATFORM FOR THE TRANSMISSION
OF COMPLETE DATA & DISSEMINATION OF INFO. TO THE PUBLIC.
Reprogramming of CMAQ construction funds to FY 2014/2015
(programming capacity issues); CMAQ funding will be obligated in
FY 2012/2013 utilizing the EPSP in place.
Toll Credits will be utilized to satisfy the CMAQ match in
construction.
Perris
RIV091012
IN MID -WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF PERRIS - CASE ROAD/MATTHEWS
RD. (SR-74) AT 1-215 INTERCHANGE: RECONFIGURATION OF THE EXISTING CASE
RD/MATTHEWS RD. (SR-74) AT I-215 IC, IMPROVING THE INTERSECTION OPERATIONS AND
ELIMINATING CROSS TRAFFIC CONFLICTS ON THE SB RAMPS, WIDEN MATTHEWS RD
FROM 2/3 LANES TO 4 LANES FROM CASE RD TO TRUMBLE RD (EA: OP420).
Reprogramming of R/W and Construction, per current schedule.
Completion date changes from 2016 to 2018 but model year
remains 2018.
RCTC
RIV520109
RECONSTRUCT & UPGRADE SAN JACINTO BRANCH LINE FOR RAIL PASSENGER SERVICE
(RIVERSIDE TO PERRIS) (PERRIS VALLEY LINE) (FY 07 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN).
Reprogramming CMAQ Funds and Measure A Match from
FY 2011/2012 to FY 2014/2015.
EPSP will be utilized for obligation in FY 2012/2013.
Riverside County
RIV060124
IN BANNING ON SUNSET AVE AT I-10 FROM S/O RAMSEY ST TO S/O LINCOLN ST: LOWER
SUNSET AVE TO CONSTRUCT NEW 4-LANE UC AT UPRR CROSSING (NON -CAPACITY) AND
RECONSTRUCT THE 1-10 IC RAMPS TO MEET THE NEW STREET GRADE (SAFETEA-LU
CA438, #1261) (EA:33471)
Reprogramming to eliminate the AC and to allow CMAQ obligation
for construction in FY 12/13, utilizing the Expedited Project
Selection Process.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV050553
IN TEMECULA FOR RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY - CONSTRUCT NEW TEMECULA/MURRIETA
TRANSIT CENTER - LOCATION UNDER STUDY (04, 05, 06, 07, E-2006-091, E-2007-0131, & 2008-
BUSP-0131, SAFETEA-LU).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years.
Description modified to include correct earmark.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130201
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF RIVERSIDE -
REGIONAL TRANSIT CENTER FOR MASS TRANSIT SERVICE IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE
COUNTY. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED (PA&ED ONLY)
New PA&ED Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years.
Number of Projects
8
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM
As of January 21, 2014
Page 16 of 32
Z£ 10 Li. 86ed
WV 6Z L L - bLOZ/.Z/L
xspc601 luawpueuN dad ELOZ
"alewgsa s,�aaupua lsalel Jed Ae!ap alnpayos pue aseaou! lsoO
'(aadn) 9NISSOHOa30Nn
(A110VdV0 NON - NOIlO3al0 HOV3 NI SN1 Z) Nl-b V H11M JNI-X a/a 30VaJ lb
(NO1103a10 HOV3 NI SN1 Z) 3NV1-ti ONLLSIX3 30V1d3a :3AV SEHVN11 0/N ,.005 XOaddV Ol
210 1Va3N39 d0 MS„00L XOaddV WOad 1S AVl0 NO A1Nn00 301Sa3Ala 1S3MH1aON NI
£Z1090A1a
�(lunoO apls�an!a
•alepdn loafad lsalel gad lelap alnpayoS
•a6en6uel (03'8Vd)
pue a31VM MO1 1V2I3A3S anowaJ of a6ueyo uo!ldposa0
"213A121 OINOJaOJ NVS 0NV N33210 HAWS 1V
SJNISS0210 3901218 d0 N0110na1SN00 AH130n10N1 S1N3W3AOadW1 213H10 'NOZV8V0
NI 11V2113H0VdV ONV ONINNVE AO A1I0 3H1 d0 ON3 N2131SV3 3H1 N33M138 OL-1 0/S
3111A1 Z/L 'XOaddV 'OL-I 3H1 210d A1I110Vd NHOM13N/SSVd-AS V 301A021d Ol AVMOVOa
d0 S3NV1 OMl lOnalSN00 :("1X3 "1S A3SWV21 A12131A1210A) H1nos SSVdA8 01,-I
ZOZL£OAIa
Alun00 ap!sJan!a
d121-dI1S pue VINO 8L
dad Jo; luawpuawe uo!leoolle le!oueug O10 gad sa6ueyo 6u!pund
(Z9Ld0:V3) 01 Oa 0A3nN ONV 01 1S 0 N33M138
S3NV1 XnV 1nalSN003a ONV NO11032110 HOV3 NI 3NV1 M01A 03XIW V 10na1SNOO
:01 Oa atom Ol 0a 110OS WOad A1Nn00 30IS213A1H 1S3MH1nOS NI 9LZ-I NO
60£0L0n121
01021
"alepdn d8H ELOZ/9Z/E gad aseaoap ls00
"(LZ00100 :# 21218H) N011VZI13NNVHO 33A31 d0 ONIISISN00 S1N3W3AOadW1 3OVNIV210
ONIOMONI '390I218 3NV1-17M3N V H11M ONISSOHO 2131VM-M01 3NV1 t ONIISIX3
30V1d321 :13NNVHO 39VNIVaO H1nos NOANVO SVN321V 213A0 210 NOANVO W1Vd 'S NO
90ZLEOAIa
s6upds wlec
'bL/£L Ad u! 01021
_04 Alpedeo do uado of papaau aye sluawlsnlpe 6ulpun; ldiS
Zl/L L Ad u! 6u!pun;
uo!le6No/uopoolle lenloe Jo uoppdpou! pue uo!sianuo0 OV
(ZO£Z£ V3) 3AV aid Ol 3AV 213013 1A10213 S3NV1
H0f10aH14 Ol Z WOad 001S NOSVN N301M :01 1S NOSVN/09aS 1V A311VA ON3a0W NI
LL L060AI21
Aa11eA oua tAl
•alepdn d8H £LOZ/9Z/£ gad spun;;o 6u!wweJ6wda21
'(0500095'ON 3J0Ia8)133211S 3NV1 0/M :IN ZZ'0
`HSVM 1VOS31/131 213A0 3001218 3NV1 b V H11M 39(11218 31\1V1 Z 'Oa NOANVO 1VOS31A131
30V1d321:JNIN301M/1N3W30V1d3a 3JOIa8 021 NOANVO 1VOS31A131- 3HONIS13 3)1Vl NI
EOZL L LAIa
eJou!s13 a)lel
•alew!lsa spau!6ua lsalel gad aseW0u! lso0
(S3111N1OV 1210d3a SISAIVNV
1V1N3WNOHIAN3 AHVNI1A111321d'5'1210d321 AOn1S 103f021d) ONISSOHO OVOaIIVH
dSN8 1V N011V2IVd3S 30VH910na1SN00 -1S A31NINO1A1 ONIISIX3 NO VN02100 NI
OtZL LONG
euono
'ZOOZ 1!JdV aoeld Tool leyl luawys!nbu!!a wo"y
A/V\H pool of alnoa °leis wall pag!ssepa `abue40 leo!uyoal
aO 30V219-1V ON11S1X3 3AOW3a
`SAVM3AI210/SJIS OlddV2111SN00321 `S11VM 9NINIV1321 'SN1VM301S `SN1 3)118 `L L L
AMH/OA18 11nad3dV219 Ol Z5 3AV WOad N01103NN00 OIdN00321 :10N1 S1N31A13A021dWI
'1S 2131A1/AVM iVlalSnON! 0/3 "ld 009 XOaddV Ol Nl AOVHS WOad ' L L L AMH/OKIE
1!nad3dV219 ONV SNOV2113NI1NIVW aadn 213A0 ONINNVdS 3an10na1S OV31-1213A0
N011V2IVd3S 30V219 Z5 3AV (A110VdVO-NON) M3N lOna1SN00 — V113H0V00 d0 A110 NI
9tiZLL0A121
ellayoeo0
'II yd pUe 1 •yd yloq Jol £til.frE
;o V3 Mau ayl ppe of uogduosap loa[ad ayl of abuey0 aou!yy
"(EbLVE/ZbLbEV3) 0921S
Ol N01103NN00 3AV SllONN N2131S3M 3A01A13a ONV `3AV SllONN N2131S3M NOI1V321
'SdWVa 11X31V SN1 XnV 8M/8310N1 `(3NV1 AOH 10N1 SdWVa Aa1N3) (SN1 Z) SdWVa
A211N3 d001 83/8M V (SN1 Z) SdWVa Aa1N3'811X3 83/8M'1SN00'SdWV21 dd0/NO
01 M3N :ZHd '(£4lbE/LbltEV3) SllONN N2131S3M 01103NN00 d11131/M (alO HOV3 SN1
£) 00 Nl 9 02132110d M3N '1SN00-11Hd :10f Olt/0921S V 2111188V21 HOVE NM18 0921S NO
5E5050A121
1NOWnV39
uosead alepdn
91111
01 loafad
Aoua6V
£LOZ `SZ '�dy :lenoidde oyos
..,��,.4Jo*,�..I
£LOZ Il�dy
g •0N uogeompoY11 and;e4siultupy - dlld SLOZ
•w
2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 8
April 2013
R..>«Cmtb:rc.� <�..
SCAG approval: Apr. 25, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Rive -side County
RIV071288
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE CO. IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY —66TH AVE GRADE SEPARATION:
CONSTRUCT A TWO-LN (1-LN IN EA DIR) 66TH AVE ELEVATED STRUCTURE OVER THE
UPRR, HAMMOND RD., AND SH-111., FROM WESTERLY OF LINCOLN ST TO JOHNSON ST ON
THE EAST IN THE COMMUNITY OF MECCA. ADD. IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED
TO TIE BACK INTO THE EXISTING ALIGNMENT.
Reprogram funding years to reflect current project schedule
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120826
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - OPERATING ASSISTANCE: FIXED ROUTE AND
DIAL -A -RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA:
HEMET)
Cost decrease per latest revisions to FTA 5311 Regional
Apportionments for Operating Assistance and removing incorrect
funds from SRTP table 4 programmed on this project.
Sunline Transit
Agency
RIV120804
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY — FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A -RIDE
OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 — FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
Cost increase per latest revisions to FTA 5311 Regional
Apportionments for Operating Assistance.
Temecula
RIV62031
1-15/SR79 SO. IC: REMOVE SB EXIT RAMP, ADD NEW SB EXIT LOOP RAMP, REALIGN SB EXIT
RAMP (2 LNS) W/AUX LN. WIDEN SB ENTRY 1 TO 3, NB EXIT 1 TO 4, NB ENTRY 1 TO 3 &
RECON SR79S.
Schedule delay is due to scope in R/W acquisition.
Temecula
RIV031215
FRENCH VALLEY PKWY IC/ARTERIAL PHASES: CONSTRUCT 6 LN IC (JEFFERSON TO YNEZ)
& RAMPS, NB/SB AUX LN, CD LNS (3 LNS NB&SB) & MODIFY WINCHESTER RD IC (1-215 PM:
8.43-9.75) (EA:43270)
Fund Source Change per Abhijit Badge direction to SCAG on
2/20/2013
Various Agencies
RIV050201
IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY GROUPED PROJECTS FOR BRIDGE REHABILITATION AND
RECONSTRUCTION - HBP PROGRAM; PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 CATEGORIES - WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR
RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES (NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES). TC UTILIZATION:$190 IN
12/13 FOR PE; $18 IN 15/16 FOR R/W; $2 IN 16/17 FOR R/W; $871 IN 16/17 FOR CONS; & $192
IN 17/18
Cost Decrease per 3/26/2013 HBP Lump Sum Update.
Description change to adjust TC utilization, per HBP funding
changes in FY 11/12.
Number of Projects
15
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of January 21, 2014
1 /2- /2014 - 11:29 AM Page 18 of 32
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 9
May 2013
k-5,4(0.-
row�a%.c�
FHWA approval: Jun. 27, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Rancho Mirage
RIV110130
IN COACHELLA VALLEY IN RANCHO MIRAGE - WIDENING OF SOUTH BOUND MONTEREY
AVE. FROM 2 TO 3 LANES FROM DINAH SHORE DR TO GERALD FORD DR. (APPROX. 3,480
L.F.). OTHER IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE INSTALLATION OF CURB AND GUTTER, DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS (RETENTION BASINS), SIGNING AND STRIPING, AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATION AT GINGER ROGERS RD.
Cost Increase per latest engineer's estimate
Riverside
RIV071272
IN RIVERSIDE ON RIVERSIDE AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4-LANE (2 LNS IN EA DIR) R/R/ X-ING
W
WITH A 4 LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) U.C. G. S. ALONG RIVERSIDE AVE BTWN
MERRILL AVE AND 400FT N/O ELIZABETH ST. ADD IMP INCLUDE INSTALLATION OF APPROX
1,100 FT OF PCC S/W ON EACH SIDE OF RIVERSIDE AVE WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS ($791
TC IN FY09/10 & $151 TC IN FY12/13 USED TO MATCH STPL IN R/W)
Cost Increase and Schedule Delay, per Baseline Agreement
Amendment and Financial TCIF allocation approval of 5/7/2013.
Removal of STPL funds in FY 2012/2013 per engineer's latest
estimate for RAN. Removal of TC language in Description due to
removal of STPL in FY 2012/2013
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV130401
THROUGHOUT WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT
RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR
REHABILITATION.
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV130402
THROUGHOUT EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT
RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR
REHABILITATION.
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV031218
IN WESTERN RIV CO - NEW MID CO PKWY: CONS 6 THRU LN (3 LNS IN EA DIR) APPROX 16
MI. BTWN 1-215 IN PERRIS EAST TO SR79 IN SAN JACINTO, INC. CONS/RECONS OF APPROX
10 ICs, ADD OF AUX LN REDLANDS-EVANS & EB AUXILIARY LN EVANS-ANTELOPE. 1-215 IMP:
ADD 1 MF LN IN EA DIR NUEVO RD -VAN BUREN BLVD, & 1 AUX LN IN EA DIR MID CO PKWY-
CAJALCO/RAMONA EXP & FROM MID CO PKWY-NUEVO.
Cost decrease to reflect latest engineer's estimate.
Project fully funded -Construction funding programmed in the
unconstrained years of the 2013 FTIP.
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV031218
IN WESTERN RIV CO - NEW MID CO PKWY: CONS 6 THRU LN (3 LNS IN EA DIR) APPROX 16
MI. BTWN 1-215 IN PERRIS EAST TO SR79 IN SAN JACINTO, INC. CONS/RECONS OF APPROX
10 ICs, ADD OF AUX LN REDLANDS-EVANS & EB AUXILIARY LN EVANS-ANTELOPE. 1-215 IMP:
ADD 1 MF LN IN EA DIR NUEVO RD -VAN BUREN BLVD, & 1 AUX LN IN EA DIR MID CO PKWY-
CAJALCO/RAMONA EXP & FROM MID CO PKWY-NUEVO.
Cost decrease to reflect latest engineer's estimate.
Project fully funded -Construction funding programmed in the
unconstrained years of the 2013 FTIP.
Caltrans
RIV120201
ON SR-60 NEAR BEAUMONT: CONSTRUCT NEW EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND TRUCK
LANES FROM GILMAN SPRINGS RD TO 1.6 MILES WEST OF JACK RABBIT TRAIL (EA:
ON690)AND UPGRADE EXISTING INSIDE AND OUTSIDE SHOULDER IN THE WB DIRECTION
TO STANDARD WIDTHS (5-FT INSIDE SHOULDER AND 10-FT OUTSIDE SHOULDER) (EA:
0Q180).
Minor change to eliminate former EA ON690 and 00180 and
replace them with the new EA ON69U.
Correction to the standard shoulder width - inside shoulder changed
from 5-ft to the Caltrans Std. of 10-ft.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130501
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE
PROGRAM OPERATING ASSISTANCE: COMMUTER LINK SERVICES - ROUTES 212 AND 217
(UZAs: HEM/SAN JAC + TEM/MURR) (FTA 5316, FY'S 11 AND 12)
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130502
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA: TRAVEL TRAINING PROGRAM (FTA 5317, FY'S
11 AND 12).
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM
Page 19 of 32
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 9
May 2013
two* Crow
FHWA approval: Jun. 27, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130503
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - JOB ACCESS & REVERSE COMMUTE
PROGRAM: EXTENDED SERVICE PROGRAM (FTA 5316, FY'S 11 AND 12).
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130504
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY
REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOR DIRECTLY OPERATED TRANSPORTATION SERVICES -
SPECIALIZED NON -EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (FTA 5317, FY'S 11
AND 12).
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle
Sunline Transit
Agency
RIV130505
IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - JOB ACCESS & REVERSE
COMMUTE PROJECT: REALIGNMENT AND EXPANSION OF SERVICE FROM INDIO TO
COACHELLA, MECCA AND THE NORTH SHORE, CONNECTING COMMUTERS TO OTHER
EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMUNITIES (FTA 5316 FY'S 11 AND 12).
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
Universal Call for Projects
Sunline Transit
Agency
RIV130506
IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY — JOB ACCESS & REVERSE
COMMUTE AND NEW FREEDOM PROJECT: EXPRESS SERVICE TO THE PASS AREA WITH
SERVICE TO CABAZON, BANNING AND BEAUMONT, MORENO VALLEY, AND RIVERSIDE,
CONNECTING COACHELLA VALLEY COMMUTERS TO WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY (FTA
5316 AND FTA 5317, FY'S 11 AND 12).
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle
Sunline Transit
Agency
RIV130507
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - NEW FREEDOM PROJECTS LUMP
SUM FOR NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS (CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93 EXEMPT TABLES
2AND 3)(FY11 & 12 - 5316 & 5317).
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle
Sunline Transit
Agency
RIV130508
IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY FOR CVAG — JOB ACCESS & REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM:
PROVIDE SHUTTLE SERVICE FOR THE HOMELESS SEEKING EMPLOYMENT - SHUTTLE
SERVICE WILL PROVIDE CONNECTIONS TO SUNLINE BUS HUBS AND TO AREAS WHERE
SUNLINE DOES NOT CURRENTLY SERVE. PROGRAM ALSO INCLUDES MOBILITY MANAGER
(FTA 5316, FY'S 11 AND 12).
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle
Number of Projects
15
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of January 21, 2014
1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 20 of 32
2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 10
June 2013
RCM
Iwo -
s
A .gee tixsc�� t.....
Cagy
SCAG approval: Jun. 25, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Perris
RIV011205
IN PERRIS - WIDEN PERRIS BLVD 2 TO 6 LANES FROM RAMONA EXPRESSWAY TO PERRIS
VALLEY STORM DRAIN - LATERAL'B' (APPROX. 1 MILE), INCLUDING CURB, GUTTER,
SIDEWALK, RAISED MEDIAN, SIGNAL WORK, UTILITY RELOCATIONS, AND MINOR DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS.
Cost Increase per latest engineers estimate
Riverside County
RIV121204
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF NORCO - ON HAMNER AVE OVER SANTA
ANA RIVER .5 MILES N/O OF SIXTH STREET, REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 6 LANE
BRIDGE (BRIDGE N0.56C0446).
Description change from city jurisdiction of Eastvale to Norco per
Riverside County's request
San Jacinto
RIV120203
IN SAN JACINTO - RAMONA EXP WIDENING PH II: RAMONA EXP WIDENING 2 TO 4 LANES (2
LANES IN EACH DIRECTION) BETWEEN EAGLE RD AND LAKE PARK DR/MAIN ST., INCLUDING
LEFT TURN OR LANDSCAPED STRIPED MEDIAN, 5-8 FT OF PAVED SHOULDER, DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS AND RELOCATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLES.
Reprogramming of WTUMF funds from FY 2013/2014 to FY
2014/2015, per current construction schedule.
CALTRANS
RIVLS01
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP COLLISION REDUCTION
PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 -
W RR/HY CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC
CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS
AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMNT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING
IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS
Cost/funding increase to EA 0M200, per RIVLS01 Grouped Listing
dated May 21, 2013.
Number of Projects
4
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of January 21, 2014
1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 21 of 32
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 11 mum ift..='
July 2013-
FHWA approval: Sept. 5, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
CALTRANS
RIVLS08
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, SHOULDER IMPROVEMENTS,
PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - MINOR PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE
CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 - RR/HWY CROSSING, SAFER
NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES/OPERATING ASSISTANCE OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PROJECTS
AT INDVL INTERSCTN, (DESCRIPTION CONT. IN COMMENTS)
New funding for SHOPP Minor Program in FY 2013/14.
City of Riverside
RIV130614
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE - CAPITALIZED
PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE (UZA'S RIVERSIDE - SAN BERNARDINO)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
City of Riverside
RIV130615
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE - CAPITAL LEASE OF OFFICE
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (UZA RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130601
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR
PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - OPERATING ASSISTANCE TO
TRANSIT AGENCIES (UZA HEMET)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130602
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR
PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND
RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET.
(UZA'S RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO AND TEMECULA-MURRIETA-MENIFEE)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130603
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED COST OF TIRE LEASE (FTA 5307 -
FY 14) (UZA: TEMECULA-MURRIETA-MENIFEE).
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130604
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - ENHANCEMENT OF THE BUS STOP SYSTEM
SUCH AS: INSTALLATION OF BUS SHELTERS AND BENCHES, KIOSKS, SIGNAGE, AND
LIGHTING TO ENHANCE SECURITY OF THE RIDING PUBLIC, AND ENHANCE ACCESS FOR
PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (UZA TEM-MUR-MEN)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130605
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - PURCHASE OF SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ITEMS
INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, BODY SHOP HEATER, SHOP AIR COMPRESSORS,
SCISSORS LIFT, MOBILITY DEVICES FOR TRAINING, PORTABLE CRANE, HAND JACKS (UZA
TEM-MUR-MEN)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130618
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
(UZA RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO AND TEMECULA-MURRIETA-MENIFEE)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130619
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - CAPITAL COST OF CONTRACTING (UZA'S
RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO AND TEMECULA-MURRIETA-MENIFEE)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Number of Projects
10
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM
As of January 21, 2014
Page 22 of 32
Z£;0 £Z abed
bLOZ `LZ /uenuer 10 sV
INV 6Z: L L- b 60Z/ 6 Z/ L
xslxbol;uawpuawV dlld £LOZ
9
s;oafad ;o iagwnN
Li, # IS 6011sll;oafad padnaO
spund V31 d1H-30NVHN3 d1S/ld1S
in yo;ew leool MI span Ilo; leuol;lppe lo; °Nato uogduosaa
a;ewl;sa s,Jaaupu3 gad asea0ul;so0
1 SNOO V31 dIH-30NVHN3 d1S/1d1S H01VIN
0103 nun 39 111M S1103HO 1101 NI 9£Z$ '(S3111110Vd HO 'S3alLon211S 'somalIns
NOI1V1HOdSNVH101H01SIH d0 NOI1VH3d0 ONV NOI1V11118VH3H 1d30X3) S3111n110d
1N3IN3ONVHN3 NOI1V1HOdSNVH1- S3I2iOJ31V0 £ 318V10NV Z S318V11dIN3X3
9ZL'£61HVd Hd0 Oq H11M 1N31SISN00 3HV S103f0Hd - S3111A110V 1N3IN30NVHN3
N011V1HOdSNVH1210d S103f021d a3dn021J - kiNn00 301SH3A1H inOHJnoHHl
LgOLgOnRi
uolssiwwo0
uol;epodsuail
quno0 appanld
(p)LI # IS 6ugsll;oafad padnwo
110110V
uolsslww00 ELOZ/ZL/9 gad s;oafad leuol;lppe o; anp asea0ul;so0
'N011V11118VH3H
HO/0NV ONIOVAHrIS3H 1N3IN3nVd - S31H0031V0 £ 318V1 ONV Z S318V11d1N3X3 9ZVE6
1HVd Hd0 017 RUM 1N31SISN00 3HV S103f0Hd - N011V11118VH3H HO/ONV ONIOVAlf1S3H
1N311\13nVd HOd S103f0Hd 03dn021J - AlNf100 3oISH3n1H NH31SV31nOHJn021H1
Z0170£LnR1
uolsslwwo0
uol;e>Jodsueil
Aluno0 appanN
(p)Lt. # IS 6ugsll;oafad padnaa
uo110V
uolsslww00 ELOZ/ZL/9 gad s;oafad leuol;lppe o; anp aseaoul;s00
'N011V11118VH3b
HO/ONV ON10VdHrlSal 1N3IN3nVd - S312:10e31V0 E 318V10NV Z S318V11d1N3X3 9ZL'£6
1HVd Hd0 Oq H11M 1N31SISN00 3HV S103f0Hd - N011V11118VH3H HO/0NV ONI0VdH11S3H
1N3W3nVd 210d S103f021d a3dn0H0 -.11Nn00 301SH3n1H NH31S3M 1nOHen02iHl
LogoELnia
uolsslwwo0
uol;euodsuau
fonoo aplsianN
L # IS 6ui;sll;oafad padnaa
£lOZ `8L AMC pa3eP
6ul;sll padna0 90S1nR1 gad '0 Lggq y3 0; aseanul 6ulpunmso0
'(93NV1 13nV211 IVNOIlIaaV ON) S3JOIHS ONI101-12i1SN003H HO S1N3IN3nVd MOHHVN
ONIN3aIM - Z 318V11dLN3X3 9ZL'E6 2id0 Oq/M 1N31SISN00 3HV S103f0HdINVHOOHd
ddOHS - N0110f1H1SN003H 0NV N011V11119VH3H 300121E HOd S103f0Hd aadn021J
90S1nIH
SNVH11V0
L# IS 6ul;s111oafad padnaa
'ql/£L Ad 0; OL£0L V3 PPe o; 9seaa011l 6ulpunme00
'(S3NV1 13nVH11VN0I1100V ON) S3501H9 ONI10(1H1SN003H
HO S1N3W3nVd /V\OHHVN ONIN301M `(5Z1 '0.S'n £Z) d3113H AON30213W3 'NOI1V11118VH3H
HO/aNV ONIOVAH(133H 1N3IN3nVd - S31H0031V0 Z S318V11d1N3X3 9ZL'£6
1HVd Hd0 Oq H1IM 1N31SISN00 3HV S103f0Hd INVHOOHd N011VAH3S3Hd AVM0VOH
ddOHS - N011V1I119VHal HO/ONV ONIOVAlf1S3H 1N3IN3nVd HOd S103f0Hd 03dflOHS
ZOS1n121
SNVH11V0
Z # IS 6u1;sll;oafad padna0
'£LOZ `91 Alnf pa;ep 6011s11 Wm:up LOS1AIH
_lad '06g210 0NV `0917H0 'Ond0 V3 o; ase0.1011l 6ulpun;Is00
SH3n011nd >10f1H1 A0N30H3IN3 'S1NINAHdWl
ONIIH011 `Vn 3H1301S1n0101 `OIN30 JNImvitu 1NWnd `SN1OSH31NI 1nONl 1V
S10f21d 1VNOIS N1OSH31NI `S1VNOIS NVH1 H3H101SISSV ONI1VH3d0/S301n301211N0
OIddVH1'S1NINAHdWl 21alnOHS'SCIH IN31SAS oIV-a3d-NON H3dVS'ONISS021OAMH/HH
- EVZ S318V11d1N3X3 9Z L'E61HVd 21d0 Oq /M 1N31SISN00 3HV S103f0Hd INVHOOHd
N011011a321 NOISI1100 ddOHS - S1N3IN3n0HdWI Al dVS HOd S103f0Hd 03dnoao
lOS1nRi
SNVH11V0
uoseaH a;epdn
811.11
al;oafad
Aoue6V
£60Z `ZZ '6my :fenoudde 0113S
,.��.w�w.,w+»w
£60Z;sn6nV
Z6 •oN uoi;e01.1ipoIAI anger;sfuiwpy - dlld £60Z
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 13:
September 2013
aa
Awn*C• ay}14.��~F
FHWA approval: Nov. 5, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
CALTRANS
RIV110122
ON 1-215 IN SW RIVERSIDE COUNTY FROM MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS RD TO 1-215/1-15
JUNCTION, CONSTRUCT A THIRD MIXED FLOW LANE SOUTHBOUND (WIDENS 1-215/1-15
CONNECTOR FROM 2 TO 3 LANES).
Lead Agency change from RCTC to Ca!trans - Current Coop
Agreement only includes Eng and R/W. Funding for Construction
will be programmed through an upcoming amendment once the
construction cost can be better estimated and coop. agreement is
executed for the construction phase.
CALTRANS
RIVLS02
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - SHOPP
ROADWAY PRESERVATION PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126
EXEMPT TABLE 2 - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION, EMERGENCY
RELIEF (23 USC 125), WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES
(NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES).
Cost increase to fully fund EA IC370 IN FY 13/14.
Grouped Project Listing SI #7.
CALTRANS
RIVLS12
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY REPAIR - SHOPP EMERGENCY RESPONSE
PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 - REPAIR
DAMAGE CAUSED BY NATURAL DISASTERS, CIVIL UNREST, OR TERRORIST ACTS. APPLIES
TO DAMAGES THAT DO NOT QUALIFY FOR FED EMERGENCY RELIEF FUNDS OR TO
DAMAGES THAT QUALIFY FOR FED EMERGENCY RELIEF FUNDS BUT EXTEND BEYOND THE
FEDERALLY DECLARED DISASTER PERIOD.
Cost increase to add funding for Eas IE490, IE520, IE530, and
IE540 in FY 13/14.
Grouped Project Listing SI #4.
MORENO VALLEY
RIV041045
WIDEN PERRIS BLVD FROM 2 TO 4 LANES FROM IRONWOOD AVE TO MANZANITA AVE
INCLUDING CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, SIGNAL MODS, STREET LIGHTS & MEDIANS
IMPROVEMENTS
New project in quadrennial years in FTIP.
Schedule delay and reprogramming of funds into FY2013/2014.
SLP funds are competitive funds
MORENO VALLEY
RIV080918
IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY - WIDEN REDLANDS BLVD BETWEEN SR-60 AND CACTUS
AVE FROM 2 TO 4 LANES. IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE MEDIANS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS,
CHANNELIZATION, LEFT TURN POCKETS, DEDICATED RIGHT TURN, DRAINAGE,
LANDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS, BIKE LANES, AND TRAILS.
Schedule delay of Implementation by one year
MORENO VALLEY
RIV090909
IN MORENO VALLEY, WIDEN THEODORE ST FROM 2 TO 4 LANES + 2 AUX LANES FROM
EUCALYPTUS AVE TO SR-60 EB RAMPS, INCLUDING MEDIANS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS,
CHANNELIZATION IMPROVEMENTS, LEFT -TURN POCKETS, DEDICATED RIGHT -TURN LANES,
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS, AND BIKE LANES.
Schedule delay and reprogramming of funds into future years
MORENO VALLEY
RIV090910
IN MORENO VALLEY, WIDEN THEODORE ST FROM 2 TO 4 LANES FROM SR-60 WB RAMPS
TO IRONWOOD AVE, INCLUDING TRAFFIC SIGNALS, CHANNELIZATION IMPROVEMENTS,
LEFT -TURN POCKETS, DEDICATED RIGHT -TURN LANES, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS,
LANDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS, AND BIKE LANES.
Schedule delay and reprogramming of funds into future years
MORENO VALLEY
RIV091004
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO. IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY - CACTUS AVE WIDENING:
WIDEN CACTUS AVE FROM 2 TO 4 THROUGH LANES (2 IN EA DIR), FROM LASSELLE ST TO
NASON ST. OTHER IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF A DEDICATED RIGHT
TURN LANE, A 2-WAY LEFT TURN LANE, BUS TURN -OUTS, LANDSCAPING & SIDEWALKS.
project Completed and actual costs updated.
SLP funds are competitive funds
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM
Page 24 of 32
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 13
September 2013
ROTC
arm
.1,.........
FHWA approval: Nov. 5, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
MORENO VALLEY
RIV110126
IN MORENO VALLEY ON FREDERICK ST FROM SUNNYMEAD BLVD TO ALESSANDRO BLVD.:
PAVEMENT RESURFACING, ADJUSTMENT OF UTILITY MANHOLE AND VALVE COVERS,
RESETTING SURVEYING MONUMENTS, RECONSTRUCTION OF ACCESS RAMPS TO MEET
ADA REQUIREMENTS, AND INSTALLING PAVEMENT STRIPING AND MARKERS
Deleted Combined Project. Scope already included in RIV130401
LS listing.
MORENO VALLEY
RIV110129
IN MORENO VALLEY ON IRIS AVE. FROM LASSELLE ST TO OLIVER ST: PAVEMENT
RESURFACING, ADJUSTMENT OF UTILITY MANHOLE AND VALVE COVERS, RESETTING
SURVEYING MONUMENTS, RECONSTRUCTION OF ACCESS RAMPS TO MEET ADA
REQUIREMENTS, AND INSTALLING PAVEMENT STRIPING AND MARKERS.
project Completed and actual costs updated.
MORENO VALLEY
RIV130808
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY- GROUPED
PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE
CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES -
PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION.
New project in quadrennial years in 2013 FTIP.
Grouped Projects for the City of Moreno Valley
SI. No. 17( c)
MORENO VALLEY
RIV071242
IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY - RECONSTRUCT INDIAN ST X-ING SR 60 FROM 150' S/O
SUNNYMEAD BLVD., TO HEMLOCK AVE: COMPLETE RECONSTRUCT. OF THE BRIDGE TO
PROVIDE 16'6" CLEARANCE & 4 THROUGH LANES (2 LNS IN EA DIR) & ASSOC. ST. IMP.
WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS (LEFT TURN POCKETS AT SUNNYMEAD AND HEMLOCK
INTERSECT., RIGHT -TURN ONLY SB AT SUNNYMEAD, NEW TS AT HEMLOCK/INDIAN ST., &
INTERCONNECT MOD) (PA&ED)
Cost Change and Schedule Advance
MORENO VALLEY
RIV041052
IN MORENO VALLEY AT SR-60/MORENO BEACH DR IC: MODIFY MORENO BEACH DR IC -
WIDEN OC FROM 2 TO 6 THROUGH LANES, REALIGN/WIDEN RAMPS (WB EXIT 1 TO 2
LANES), ADD NEW WB ENTRY RAMP (2 LANES), AND ADD WB AUX LANE (EA:32303).
Cost Increase to add the drainage improvements for the IC
modifications
MORENO VALLEY
RIV05053
3
AT I-215/CACTUS AVE IC: WIDEN IC FROM 3 TO 6 THRU LNS (EB FROM 2 TO 3 BTWN W/O
BNSF RR TO 1300' E/O VETERANS WAY, ADD 4TH EB LANE FROM NB EXIT RAMP TO E/O
ELSWORTH ST, WIDEN WB FROM 1&2 TO 3 THRU LNS FROM COMMERCE CENTER DR TO
BNSF RR), WIDEN RAMPS 1 TO 2&3 LNS (ENTRY RAMPS INL HOV), EXTEND NB AUX LN
BTWN ALESSANDRO BLVD SOUTH TO CACTUS AVE NB ENTRY LOOP RAMP & ADD
DEDICATED RT-TURN LNS (EA0E760).
Schedule Delay - model year remains 2018.
Anticipated construction completion delay is associated to the
timing to secure the environmental approval.
PVVTA
RIV130616
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY -
OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FIXED ROUTE AND PARATRANSIT SERVICES (NON-UZA) (FTA
5317 FY 11/12)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for PVVTA -
Operating Assistance.
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM
Page 25 of 32
4:2
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 13 r-----
-rc.,kwWav-- ---w�
September 2013
FHWA approval: Nov. 5, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV130803
IN RIVERSIDE CO - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES & RAIL CARS TO
REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET: PROJECTS ARE
CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES -
PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR
MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET (FTA 5310 - FFY 12) ($37 TDC USED TO MATCH FTA 5310
IN CONS).
RCTC's FTA 5310 Call for Projects covering FFY 2011/2012
resulted in the approval of a regional priority list for submittal to
Caltrans for CTC's approval on October 8, 2013 (110% funding
level). The Riverside County Transportation Commission
recommended funding for vehicle replacement projects for
Peppermint Ridge (1, modified raised top), Desert Arc (3, minivan,
medium bus (cng), and large bus) and Friends of Moreno Valley
Senior Center, Inc (1, Medium Bus). Transportation development
credits in the amount of $37,393 are being utilized to satisfy the
required federal match.
SI. No. 58
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV130804
IN RIVERSIDE CO - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES & RAIL CARS TO
REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET: PROJECTS ARE
CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES
PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR
MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET (FTA 5310 - FFY 12) ($54 TDC USED TO MATCH FTA 5310
IN CONS).
RCTC's FTA 5310 Call for Projects covering FFY 2011/2012
resulted in the approval of a regional priority list for submittal to
Caltrans for CTC's approval on October 8, 2013 (110% funding
level). The Riverside County Transportation Commission
recommended funding for vehicle expansion projects for Angel
View, Inc (2, Larger Bus), Desert Arc (2, larger buses) and Care -A -
Van Transit 2, minivan and modified raised to Transportation
( p)
development credits in the amount of $54,484.00 are being utilized
to satisfy the required federal match.
SI. No. 58
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV130806
IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF OFFICE, SHOP, AND
OPERATING EQUIPMENT FOR EXISTING FACILITIES: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40
CFR PART 93.126, EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PURCHASE OF OFFICE,
SHOP, AND OPERATING EQUIPMENT FOR EXISTING FACILITIES (FTA 5310 - FFY 12) (1 K
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CREDITS USED TO MATCH FTA 5310 IN CONS).
RCTC's FTA 5310 Call for Projects covering FFY 2011/2012
resulted in the approval of a regional priority list for submittal to
Caltrans for CTC's approval on October 8, 2013 (110% funding
level). The Riverside County Transportation Commission
recommended funding for a mobile radio for Peppermint Ridge.
Transportation development credits in the amount of $115.00 are
being utilized to satisfy the required federal match.
SI. No. 54
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130606
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - OPERATING ASSISTANCE (UZA INDIO-
CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 11/12 & FY 12/13)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline -
Operating Assistance.
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130607
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - REHABILITATE 15 BUSES. REHABILITATION
INCLUDES: REPLACING ENGINES, TRANSMISSIONS, SEAT COVERS, DECALS AS WELL AS
PURCHASE OF OTHER BUS EQUIPMENT TO REPAIR/REHABILITATE BUSES. (UZA INDIO-
CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline - Project
No. SL 14-01
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM
Page 26 of 32
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 13
September 2013
RCTC
w �- .
('
FHWA approval: Nov. 5, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130608
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - PURCHASE OF (4) NEW PARATRANSIT
VANS TO REPLACE (4) EXISTING PARATRANSIT VANS. (UZA INDIO-CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM
SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline -Project
No. SL 14-02
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130609
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - TRANSIT STOP ENHANCEMENTS.
ENHANCEMENTS INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO: PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF 38
NEW BUS SHELTERS AND BUS STOP SITE IMPROVEMENTS SAFETY AND SECURITY (UZA
INDIO-CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline - Project
No. SL 14-03
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130610
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - CNG FUELING STATION REPLACEMENT
PHASE I (UZA INDIO-CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline - Project
No. SL 14-06
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130612
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - PURCHASE VARIOUS IT EQUIPMENT,
SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR EXISTING AGENCY SYSTEM NEEDS (UZA INDIO-
CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline -Project
No. SL 14-05
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130613
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - PURCHASE 3 REPLACEMENT AND 2 NEW
EXPANSION CNG SUPPORT VEHICLES AND 6 REPLACEMENT SERVICE VEHICLES. (UZA
INDIO-CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline -Project
No. SL 14-07
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130801
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE (UZA INDIO-
CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 11/12)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline -
Preventive Maintenance.
FTA 5307 funds from 2012/2013 carryover and CMAQ funds flex
transferred into FTA 5307 funds from CA-95-X076 in the amount of
$77,464
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130805
IN RIVERSIDE CO - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES & RAIL CARS TO
REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET: PROJECTS ARE
CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES -
PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR
MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET (FTA 5310 - FFY 12) ($21 TDC USED TO MATCH FTA 5310
IN CONS).
RCTC's FTA 5310 Call for Projects covering FFY 2011/2012
resulted in the approval of a regional priority list for submittal to
Caltrans for CTC's approval on October 8, 2013 (110% funding
level). The Riverside County Transportation Commission
recommended funding for vehicle expansion projects for Sunline
Transit Agency (2, medium buses (cng). Transportation
development credits in the amount of $20,876.00 are being utilized
to satisfy the required federal match.
SI. No. 58
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130807
IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF OFFICE, SHOP, AND
OPERATING EQUIPMENT FOR EXISTING FACILITIES: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40
CFR PART 93.126, EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PURCHASE OF OFFICE,
SHOP, AND OPERATING EQUIPMENT FOR EXISTING FACILITIES (FTA 5310 - FFY 12) (1 K
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CREDITS USED TO MATCH FTA 5310 IN CONS).
RCTC's FTA 5310 Call for Projects covering FFY 2011/2012
resulted in the approval of a regional priority list for submittal to
Caltrans for CTC's approval on October 8, 2013 (110% funding
level). The Riverside County Transportation Commission
recommended funding for 2 mobile radios for Sunline Transit
Agency. Transportation development credits in the amount of
$230.00 are being utilized to satisfy the required federal match.
SI. No. 54
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1 /21 /2014 - 11:29 AM
Page 27 of 32
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 13
September 2013
FHWA approval: Nov. 5, 2013
Rcic
OWN
td�nr, 1�yrtspuRwsrt <. .p'
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Number of Projects
28
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of January 21, 2014
1/2'/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 28 of 32
2013 FTiP - Administrative Modification No. 14
October 2013
�r si ... .
k r54e Comfy (moremur
SCAG approval: Oct. 23, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
CALTRANS
RIVLS01
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP COLLISSION REDUCTION
PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 283 - R/R
/HWY CROSSINGS, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC
CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS
AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING
IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS.
Cost increase to add EA IC740 IN FY 15/16.
Grouped Project Listing SI #2.
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV130401
THROUGHOUT WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT
RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR
REHABILITATION.
Cost Increase due to additional projects per 9/11/2013 Commission
Action
Grouped Project Listing SI # 17(d)
Number of Projects
2
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of January 21, 2014
1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM Page 29 of 32
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 15 ma -
October 2013`�
FHWA approval: Dec. 18, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
CALTRANS
RIVLS02
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - SHOPP
ROADWAY PRESERVATION PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126
EXEMPT TABLE 2 - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION, EMERGENCY
RELIEF (23 USC 125), WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES
(NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES).
Cost increase to increase funding for EA: IC370 IN FY 13/14.
Grouped Project Listing SI #7.
CALTRANS
RIVLSI2
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY REPAIR - SHOPP EMERGENCY RESPONSE
PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 - REPAIR
DAMAGE CAUSED BY NATURAL DISASTERS, CIVIL UNREST, OR TERRORIST ACTS. APPLIES
TO DAMAGES THAT DO NOT QUALIFY FOR FED EMERGENCY RELIEF FUNDS OR TO
DAMAGES THAT QUALIFY FOR FED EMERGENCY RELIEF FUNDS BUT EXTEND BEYOND THE
FEDERALLY DECLARED DISASTER PERIOD.
Cost increase to add Ea: IE270 in FY 13/14.
Grouped Project Listing SI #4.
CVAG
RIV131005
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR CVAG: CONSTRUCT NEW 52 MILE BICYCLE,
PEDESTRIAN AND LOW SPEED ELECTRICAL VEHICLE PATH FROM CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
TO CITY OF COACHELLA (PA&ED ONLY).
New project in quadrennial years in FTIP.
Agency funding includes grant from Strategic Growth Council and
Planning Grant from Ca!trans
2012 RTP ID:
3NL04
INDIO
RIV151001
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF INDIO - RECONSTRUCT AND IMPROVE
HIGHWAY 111 FROM 760 FT WEST OF MADISON ST TO RUBIDOUX ST INCLUDING UPDATING
ALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND UPDATE ALL SIDEWALKS, RAMPS AND DRIVEWAYS TO
CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. WIDEN OF HIGHWAY 111 FROM 4 LANES (2 IN EACH DIR) TO 6
LANES (3 IN EACH DIR).
New project in quadrennial years in FTIP.
2012 RTP ID:
3A07031
PERRIS
RIV131006
IN THE CITY OF PERRIS -1-215 AT NUEVO RD IC IMP.: WIDENING OF NB AND SB OFF RAMPS
FROM 2 TO 3 LNS, ADD. OF WB RT TURN LN ONTO THE NB 1-215 ON RAMP (WID. FROM 2
TO 3 LANES, 2 EXIST. THRU LNS + 1 NEW RT TURN LN), AND ADDITION OF WB LEFT TURN
LN ONTO SB 1-215 ON RAMP (WID. FROM 3 TO 4 LNS - 2 THRU EXIST LNS, 1 LEFT TURN LN +
1 NEW LEFT TURN LANE) & SW INSTALL E/O OC.
New project
2012 RTP ID 3M04WT014
Number of Projects
5
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM
As of January 21, 2014
Page 30 of 32
ZE l0 4£ 96ed
NV 6Z 44-b40Z/1Z/4
xslx"601;uauapuaLuV dlld E40Z
£40Z/91/14
uo a;epdll d8H gad spund to 6upwei6aldab pue aseanu1;s00
"(9Z00099:#21d8H) 3AV 13NHVO 01 ONISS0d0d3A0 2i2idfl 1/10213
'(N01103dI0 HOV3 NI £) S3NV1 9 Ol Z W0213 Zia NOANVO NVIONI N301M :SJNlddS WIVd NI
LZL066AI2J
s6uudS wled
£ lOZ/5 L/l 4 uo a;epd� d8H gad spund l0 6ulwwe�6alda2{
Z900100 "ON 300Id8 - 300de 3NV1-4 M3N V HlIM d3Ald 2i31VM311HM 1V ONINO V1SIA
NO JNISS0d0 d31VM MO1 3NV1-ti ONIISIX3 30V1d3d :SJNIddS WIVd JO A110 3H1 NI
9017060Al2i
s6uudS wled
bL/ElA3 04 El/ZLAd wall spun; uo010 6ulwwel6oided
+
"(Cld SVN321V-13NNVHO 01SIdV8) 6-1 aS SONI2dS WIVd SN00'8 '(2110 V3 NI Nl 1 'SN1
Z HN3 dV0 `Cid 01S1dV8-Cld SVN3dV) Zia VSOW23H "1X3 `(Sl1V1S ">121Vd AV8 311S3d0
301A02d 01 ((dVO-NON) Od SVN3dV-AM NAO z_unaHVl) "2i0 VSOW213H N301M :ONI dWl
"(21O VSOW2i3H'2 AM NANO ZlIno Vl d0 21311d00 3S) Wf13Sf1W 31N311V0 Vfl`JV 3H1210d
'0Vd'2 S321f110f1211S 1NVNaldrlddV'8 ONDIdVd "H3A "NIVdC1 `AVMa21- SJNlddS 011Vd NI
Z04060Al2i
s6uudS wled
£ lOZ/91./1l uo elepdn d8H _lad spund to 6L: wei6alda21
"(LZ00100 :# ddElF1) N011VZI13NNVH0 33A31 30 ONIISISN00 S1N31/0A0ddW1 30VNIVd0
JNIanioNI `3ec i8 3NV1-17M3N V H11M ONISS02i0 d31VM-M01 3NV1 .17 ONIISIX3
30V1d3d :13NNVHO 3JVNIVda H1f10S NOANVO SVN3dV 213A0 da NOANVO WIVd "S NO
90Z4EOAld
s6uudS wled
E40Z/94/44
uo a;epda d8H gad /(eia0 alnpayoS pue spund l0 6ulwwai6aldab
"0 10Z/01.0Z Ad NI M/21 230d (=nun S1103d011018Z5"LZS) (Z910099 4t2i8)
S31-10VOdddV 03d1f10321 11V'8 Sd301110HS /M 3AV SWVaV 013AV NO1ONIHSVM W02dd
N33210 V131dIdnW daA0 WOO 300Id8 "1S VAvne 3NV1 Z MAN 1Of12i1SNOO - V13R12if1W NI
170ZI£0Ald
elapirm
£10Z/91./l4 uo elepdfl d8H Jed spund to 6ulwwe-160-1dod
"(0900099'ON 3001d8)133d1S 3NV1 0/M'IW ZZ"O
`HSVM 1VOS31A131 d3A0 3001d8 3NV-1 17 V H1IM 3901218 3NV1 Z "OH NOANVO 1VOS31A131
30V1d3d:ONIN301M/1N31/30V1d3d 30012i8 aH NOANVO 1VOS3W31-3dONIS13 3NV1 NI
EOZ14 4AId
wou1s13 eNel
£40Z/51/41 ' elePdfl d8H gad spund to 6ulwwei6alda21
(0L00100'ON 300Id8 - d3Ald d31VM311HM )13NNVHO 2131VMW2i01S A311VA
V113H0V00 3H1 d3A0 3OCIld8 3NV117 H11M ONISSOHO 2131VM MO1 3NVl-E 30V1d3d
:Cid SWIVd 3Nna NO - V1NIf10 Vl JO A110 3H1 NI AiNf100 3aISH3Ald N2131SV3 NI
ZOZ4ZLAN
Blum el
£LOZ/9L/L l uo a;epda d8H gad spund l0 6ulwwea6alda21
"39Old8 3H1 JO 3018 HOV3 NO
>11VM301S ld 9 ONIOf11ONI `(9900100 "ON 3001219) 3J0R18 3NV1 anod V H11M 13NNVHO
d31VMW2101S A311VA V1131-10V00 3H1 d3A0 ONISS0d0 d31VM MO1 3NV1 OMl
bti 3f1N3AV ONIISIX3 30V1d3d :1N3W3OVld3d 30a1218 i V 3AV - OIONI JO A_LIO 3H1 NI
ZOZ4 4 4AI21
01Pu1
£40Z/51/11 u0 alePdfl d8H gad spund l0 6ulwwe�6aldad
-S1213A1f1O aNV ONI
-X H31VM MO1 JO 1VA0Ved ONV N0110310dd HnoaS 13NNVHO `SAVM3AId0/1VNOIS
0133V21110f1d1SN003d `S>11VM301S `SlIVd1/S3NV1 3N18 30MONl S1N3W3A0ddW1
d3H10 "N01103Sd31N1 S98-dS 011IV2113H0VdV 0/M 13-00E W021d 3901d8 (dICI V3
NI SNl-E) N1-9 V HAM (9900100 "ON 3001d8) ONI-X d31VM MO1 Nl-Z V dO 1N31A130V1d3d
:13NNVHO 2131VMW2iO1S V113H0V00 d3A0 OS 3AV - V113H0V00 dO A110 3H1 NI
5Z8011AR1
ellayoeo^
EIOZ/54/l1
uo a;epd0 d8H gad (elan alnpayoS pue spund l0 6ulwww6aldaa
"(69 L0099 'ON 30012:18)103f021d 3H1 d0 301S 1SV3 3E11 ONO1V N1VM3aIS ONV NVI03W
03SIVN V d0 N0110f1d1SN00 3H1 ONIOf11ON1 `0-linos 3H1 01 "021 Z3d3d 0NV FIldON
3H1 01 V0Vd1S3 VIA) 30ClId8 3H10/N ld 09Z 01 3001d8 3E110/S ld 09£ "XOdddV W02id
`(dICI V3 NI SNl £) SNl 9 0117 W021d HO WIVd 31V0 d0 ONIN301M:d3Ald d31VM311HM
3H1213A0 Zia 1A11Vd 31V0 - A311VA V113H0V00 3H1 NI ktNnoo 3OISd3Ald Nd31SV3 NI
L 1.01.60ARi
Ain lelpay;e0
uoseaj alepdn
el411
pl;oafwd
Aoua6y
£ 60Z `0£ '300 gemudde oVOS
�.,..r...�,wa.)pow,
r
£60Z �agwaaaa
91, •oN uogeagipow angeilsluluapd - dlld £60Z
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 16 rr 11111100w
December 2013 t'
SCAG approval: Dec. 30, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
RCTC
RIV130402
THROUGHOUT EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT
RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR
REHABILITATION.
Cost Increase from $4,886 to $5,404 per commission action
Grouped Project Listing SI # 17(d)
RCTC
RIV120101
RCTC COMMUTER RAIL SYSTEMATIC IMP. OF FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT: REHAB OF
RCTC'S COMM. RAIL IN COORDINATION W/METROLINK, INCLUDING REHAB OF TRACK,
SIGNALS, COMMUNICATION, MECHANICAL & LAYOVER FACILITIES, ROLLING STOCK
(LOCOMOTIVES/PASSENGER RAIL CARS), DEV. OF PTC IN SO. CA., AND IMPROVEMENTS,
EXPANSION, AND REHAB OF METROLINK STATION PARKING AND FACILITIES ($2,073.40 TC
FOR 20% MATCH IN FY 13/14)
New project in 2013 FTIP.
RCTC
RIV520111
REGIONAL RIDESHARE - CONTINUING PROGRAM ($309.69 IN TOLL CREDITS UTILIZED TO
MATCH CMAQ IN CONS).
Reprogramming of Con Funds from FY13/14 to FY 12/13 due to
programming capacity issues
Riverside County
RIV111003
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY - MARKET STREET
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT: REPLACE THE EXISTING TWO LANE (ONE LANE IN EACH
DIRECTION) MARKET STREET BRIDGE OVER THE SANTA ANA RIVER, 0.4 MILES
NORTHWEST OF SR60 WITH A FOUR LANE (TWO LANES IN EACH DIRECTION) BRIDGE.
BRIDGE NO. 56C0024
Reprogramming of Funds per HBP Update on 11/15/2013
Riverside County
RIV121203
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY - ON AVE 56/AIRPORT DR,
REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER WHITEWATER RIVER .21 MILES E/O
HWY 111 (BRIDGE NO.56C0020).
Reprogramming of Funds per HBP Update on 11/15/2013
Riverside County
RIV121204
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF NORCO - ON HAMNER AVE OVER SANTA
ANA RIVER .5 MILES N/O OF SIXTH STREET, REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 6 LANE
BRIDGE (BRIDGE NO.56C0446).
Reprogramming of Funds per HBP Update on 11/15/2013
Riverside County
RIV050534
AT I-215/NEWPORT RD IC: RECONSTRUCT/WIDEN FROM 4 TO 6 THROUGH LANES BETWEEN
HAUN RD AND ANTELOPE RD, RELOCATE NB AND SB EXIT RAMPS (3 LANES),
RECONFIGURE NB & SB ENTRY RAMPS TO INCLUDE HOV LANE, ADD NEW NB AND SB LOOP
ENTRY RAMPS (2 LANES), INCLUDE EXTENDED RAMP ACCELERATION/DECELERATION
LANES, ADD EXTENDED DEDICATED RIGHT -TURN LANES (EA: 0J440).
Cost decrease based on current engineer's estimate.
STPL funds added to project, per /multi -funding call for projects
scoring.
Completion date change from 2015 to 2016 - model year remains
2018.
STPL obligation will utilize EPSP to obligate funding in FY 2013/14.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120827
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
FOR FY 12-13 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB, TEM/MURR/MEN).
Reprogramming of Con Funds from FY 2012/2013 to FY 2013/2014
per agency and SCAG's request.
TEMECULA
RIV62029
AT HWY 79 SO AND LA PAZ ST: ACQUIRE LAND, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT PARK -AND -RIDE
LOT - 157 SPACES.
Reprogramming of funds to add CMAQ and reduce CITY Funds
due to RCTC's 2013 Call for projects.
Technical change to change SR-79 from State Highway to Local
Highway due to relinquishment of SR-79 to city of Temecula per
CTC action on January 19-20, 2005.
Number of Projects
19
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1/21/2014 - 11:29 AM
As of January 21, 2014
Page 32 of 32
AGENDA ITEM 6
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 27, 2014
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager
Eric DeHate, Staff Analyst
SUBJECT:
2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Update and
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
RCTC staff would first like to thank the Technical Advisory Committee Primary and Alternates
for providing the necessary information for the 2015 FTIP Update; the amendment was
submitted to SCAG by the established deadline of January 3, 2014. The 2015 Update
included 382 projects. The Table below summarizes the four main categories of projects
included in the 2015 FTIP Update. The new projects from the 2013 Multi -Funding Call for
Projects, approved by Commission on January 8, 2014 and the previously approved 2013
Pavement Rehabilitation STP funding were incorporated into the update. Other major
changes included Caltrans HBP updates of November 15, 2013:
2015 FTIP Update Summary
Local
Highway
Projects
State
Highway
Projects
Transit
Projects
Totals
Carry Over Projects with
changes
93
45
111
249
Completed Projects
13
20
49
82
Deleted Projects
5
3
2
10
New Projects
19
5
17
41
Totals
130
73
179
382
Also included in the 2015 FTIP Update, are old and new Transportation Control Measures
(attached). As you may be aware, Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) are specific
transportation projects and programs committed to help improve air quality, regardless of the
source of funding. Riverside County is included in three Air Basins, but the only Air Basin that
currently includes TCMs is the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). Since Western Riverside
County is in the SCAB basin, it's the only portion currently that has TCMs. Within the SCAB
region, TCM's are divided into three major categories:
" T r a n s i t a n d n o n - m o t o r i z e d m o d e s ;
" H O V L a n e s a n d t h e i r p r i c i n g a l t e r n a t i v e s ; a n d
" I n f o r m a t i o n - b a s e d s t r a t e g i e s
A l l o f t h e s e T C M s r e q u i r e t i m e l y i m p l e m e n t a t i o n . P l e a s e r e v i e w y o u r T C M ' s s c h e d u l e a n d
d e l i v e r y o u r p r o j e c t b y t h e e x p e c t e d c o m p l e t i o n d a t e . T C M s a r e r e p o r t e d f o r a n F T I P u p d a t e
o r R T P u p d a t e t o S C A G a n d h a v e t o b e d e l i v e r e d b y i t s c o m p l e t i o n d a t e . F a i l u r e t o d e l i v e r
t h e p r o j e c t b y t h e c o m p l e t i o n d a t e m a y j e o p a r d i z e c o n f o r m i t y f o r t h e e n t i r e S C A G r e g i o n . I f
c o n f o r m i t y i s l o s t f o r t h e r e g i o n , a l l f e d e r a l f u n d i n g f o r t h e r e g i o n i s a l s o h a l t e d . P l e a s e d o n o t
t a k e t h i s l i g h t l y . T C M s a c c o u n t f o r a p p r o x i m a t e l y $ 2 . 1 b i l l i o n d o l l a r s i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y a n d
f a i l u r e t o d e l i v e r t h e s e p r o j e c t s w o u l d h a v e a n a d v e r s e e f f e c t o n t h e $ 5 . 6 b i l l i o n c u r r e n t l y
p r o g r a m m e d i n t h e 2 0 1 5 F T I P .
A t t a c h m e n t : 2 0 1 5 F T I P T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o n t r o l M e a s u r e ' s P r o j e c t C a t e g o r y
DRAFT
2015 FTIP - Transportation Control Measure's Project Category
FTIP ID
Lead Agency
Project Title
TCM Program Year*
Total Project Cost
(in 000's)
Project Status
Completion Date
RIV041030
Riverside Transit
Agency
Hemet Transit Facility
FFY 09/10
1,442
PA&ED
12/31/2015
RIV050553
Riverside Transit
Agency
Temecula-Murrieta Transit
Center
FFY 08/09
9,135
Pre PA&ED
12/31/2015
RIV071240
Moreno Valley
Cactus Ave Widening and
Signal Synchronization
FFY 12/13
3,500
Construction
2/28/2015
RIV071250
RCTC
SR-91 Corridor
Improvement Project
FFY 12/13
1,311,660
Design Build
9/4/2017
RIV071267
RCTC
1-15 Corridor Improvement
Project
FFY 14/15
433,000
PA&ED
12/31/2020
RIV090609
Riverside Transit
Agency
Advance Traveler
Information Systems
FFY 09/10
740
Design
12/31/2015
RIV110914
RCTC for Indian
Health Inc.
Mini -Van Expansion
FFY 10/11
220
Purchasing Vehicles
12/31/2014
As of 1/14/2014
DRAFT
2015 MP - Transportation Control Measure's Project Category
FTIP ID
Lead Agency
Project Title
TCM Program Year*
Total Project Cost
(in 000's)
Project Status
Completion Date
RIV111207
RCTC
Western Riverside County
Park N Ride Facilities
FFY 12/13
690
Ongoing
12/31/2018
RIV151201
Eastvale
Hamner Avenue Traffic
Signal Synchronization of
six signalized intersections
FFY 14/15
384
Pre PA&ED
12/31/2015
RIV151202
Moreno Valley
Traffic Management
Center and Traffic Signal
Synchronization of 45
signalized intersections
FFY 15/16
2,400
Pre PA&ED
12/31/2016
RIV151205
Riverside
Traffic Signal
Sychronization of 49
signalized intersections
FFY 15/16
1,857
Pre PA&ED
12/31/2016
RIV151207
Riverside
4.3 mile Pedestrian
Walking Path adjacent to
Santa Ana Bicycle Trail
FFY 15/16
3,250
Pre PA&ED
12/31/2018
RIV151209
Riverside
Bicycle Share Program in
downtown Riverside and
UCR locations
FFY 14/15
303
Pre PA&ED
12/31/2015
RIV151210
Riverside County
7.2 mile Salt Creek Mult-
i
, Modal Trail from Canyon
Lake to Menifee to Hemet
FFY 15/16
1 6,405
Pre PA&ED
12/31/2020
As of 1/14/2014
DRAFT
2015 FTIP - Transportation Control Measure's Project Category
FTIP ID
Lead Agency
Project Title
TCM Program Year*
Total Project Cost
(in 000's)
Project Status
Completion Date
RIV151211
Riverside Transit
Agency
Limited Stop Service From
UCR to the Galleria at Tyler
FFY 15/16
12,283
Pre PA&ED
12/31/2020
RIV151213
Wildomar
Grand Ave Phase I Bicycle
Lanes from Clinton Keith
Rd to David Brown Middle
School
FFY 14/15
951
Pre PA&ED
12/31/2015
RIV151214
Wildomar
Grand Ave Phase II Bicycle
Lanes from Corydon Rd to
David Brown Middle
School
FFY 15/16
1,019
Pre PA&ED
12/31/2016
RIV151215
Riverside
Bruce Street Pedestrian
Sidewalks from Adair Ave
to Lake Street
FFY 14/15
403
Pre PA&ED
12/31/2016
RIV520109
RCTC
Perris Vatley Line
FFY 08/09
248,251
Construction
12/31/2015
RIV520111
RCTC
Western Riverside County
Regional Rideshare
FFY 04/05
12,857
Ongoing
6/30/2018
2,050,750
* TCM Program Year includes carry over projects from prior FTIP's
As of 1/14/2014
AGENDA ITEM 7
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 27, 2014
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager
SUBJECT:
Draft Federal Fiscal Year 2013/14 Obligation Plan
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21), just like SAFETEA-LU continues to
allocate federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) and Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality (CMAQ) funding to the states; the states in turn sub -allocate funding to the regions (or
counties) based on the specific funding distribution for each fund source. In Riverside
County, the Commission is responsible for the administration of the STP and CMAQ funding.
Each year, we ask for your assistance by providing us with your project delivery schedules
that allow us to prepare the Riverside County Federal STP and CMAQ Delivery Plan. The
plan that we prepare provides critical information to the Commission and allows us to develop
contingency plans, such as loans between regions or project substitution, based on the target
amount of federal funds that needs to be obligated during the fiscal year. Likewise, the plan
allows Caltrans to monitor the rate of obligations and develop contingency plans for use of
any funds that may not be obligated at a statewide level. The expectation is for each region
to obligate 100% of its STP and CMAQ allocations or Obligation Authority (OA). With your
assistance, as a region, Riverside County obligated 88.9% in FY 2012/13.
As a region, we have until April 1st of each year to obligate our annual OA target, after which
the OA becomes available for use by other regions within the state. If the state as a whole
does not use all of the OA, then the unobligated balance will return to the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) for redistribution to other states that have obligated 100% of the OA.
This is an opportunity that allows states to obligate more federal funding than initially
received. This is referred to as the "August Redistribution." For the FFY 2012/13, California
received an additional $58 million in "August Redistribution," the 14th consecutive year that
California obligates 100% of its OA (see attached FFY 2012-13 OA report).
While we realize that some projects experience schedule delays because of issues such as
environmental or right of way certification requirements, staff encourages agencies to
obligate as early as possible. This increases the likelihood that there will be OA available for
the project in the current fiscal year and may even bring more OA for Riverside County
agencies than originally anticipated.
The draft FFY 2013/14 Obligation Plan presented reflects the schedules provided by the local
agencies through the 2015 FTIP Update and the recently submitted Multi -Funding Call for
Projects. These schedules have been incorporated in the January 2014 Project Milestone
Reports and are available for input/update until February 14tn
As always, we appreciate your collaboration in this process.
Attachments: Caltrans FFY 2012/13 Obligation Delivery Report
Draft 2013/14 Obligation Plan
$TATF. OF CALIFORNIA—CALIFORNIA STATE.. TRANSPORT ATION AGENCY
_iDMUND G. BROWN Jr.. Governor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF LOCAL ASSISTANCE
1120 N Street, MS-1
P.O. 130X 942873
SACRAMENTO, CA 94273-0001
PHONE (916) 653-1776
FAX (916) 654-2409
rrY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
October 17, 2013
To: Caltrans' Local Partners
Dear Executive Directors:
Rex your power!
Be energy efficient!
Congratulations on delivering 100 percent of the federal fiscal year (FFY) 2013 obligation
authority (OA), including $58 million in additional local OA made available via the August
Redistribution. Through one of the largest and strongest partnerships of local, regional, State and
federal governments, California citizens are receiving needed transportation improvements
including transit, local streets, bicycle, and highway projects. pproximately $1.2 billion of
formula federal -aid OA was obligated to fund projects. This s the 14th consecutive year regions
and local agencies have achieved 100 percent delivery of avai able OA
I look forward to continuing this partnership in FFY 2014 and again delivering 100 percent of
our OA. To meet that goal, it is important for the regions to submit obligation plans to the
Division of Local Assistance (DLA) by April 1, 2014. This will help us review, prioritize and
track projects, and plan the workload for the remaining FFY 2014 OA. The annual notification
for the provisions of Assembly Bill 1012 "Use It or Lose It" including the current template for
the obligation plans, will be sent to the regions and available on the DLA web site by
November 15, 2013.
To ensure your projects arc delivered, we encourage you to submit your request for
authorizations (RFAs) as soon as possible this FFY. Please bear in mind that the annual release
of OA to the local OA pool will be May 1, 2014, per the OA Management Policy. After this
date, the formula OA will be first come, first serve until gone. In addition, to allow time for the
Federal Highway Administration to review and approve requests for funding, RFAs will need to
be submitted to Caltrans by July 1, 2014.
To ensure full use of all transportation funds as soon as possible, our local partners are
encouraged to:
1. Deliver all projects programmed in the current year of the Federal Transportation
Improvement Program (FTIP).
2. Advance projects from the outer years of the FTIP using Expedited Project Selection
Procedure.
3. Work with your local Caltrans District Director to determine if additional State highway
"Caltrans improves mobility across California"
Caltran's Local Partners
October 17, 2013
Page 2
projects could be recipients of these funds.
4. Fund all federal projects at the maximum participation rate.
Despite the challenges in delivering transportation projects, I am confident our continued
partnership will allow us to meet our delivery goals again this year. If you have any questions,
please call Tony Prandini at (916) 653-7200 or Peggy Siu at (916) 651-6875.
Sincerely,
L Z�
RIHUI ZHANG
Acting Chief
Division of Local Assistance
c: District Deputy Directors for Local Assistance, Caltrans
District Local Assistance Engineers, Caltrans
Office Chiefs, Division of Local Assistance, Caltrans
Fardad Falakfarsa, Division of Budgets, Caltrans
"Caltrans improves mobility across California"
E I-OZ '9 JagwanoN
seJold uyor Rq paiedeJd
(£00' 8SZ'b L )
%9 SO L
LZ£'Z6L'L9Z' L 989'6E17'00Z' L
sasodhnd ieuopewJo;u io; pafeidsyp e;ep ieaX loud (le;o_L) (Z Lints)
a1A suowbvio Vo einwioj ZLOZ Add
(8ZS'Z8S'8)
999'96[LS %S 90L
ZLE'bLL'89Z'L 68L'96E'ZOZ'L 166Z'E
(66Z'£) I (009'6Z£'LL) 9 (£0089Z'bL) 00'Z69£86'LZZ'L 1V101
6 LO'889'L4
%4 LZ 98S'ZS6'ZL
40904909
- 998' L94'04 00 64C8L0'0Z S12dS
69Z'40L'L8L %60Z L6L'985'64 994'06Z'LEZ I
OE4' l99'4L L 00'9£0'6ZL'Z9 Llaws
(989 L9Z'6L)
£L9'440.9L %OZSL
009549'8LZ Z04'E£E'68L
I
(090'Z9E'66) 00'Z94'969'Z8Z
d9H
(LEZ'L09'490 Z40'L9L'L4
%98ZL 066'68SLZ6
9LL`LEZ'12L 166Z`£ (66Z'E)
1 (OOS'6Z£'L.0 (6£Z'6L6'6ZL)
OO SS4'084'Z98 S31ONESV 1V001 1V101
009'0ZL %L b6
££Z'606 ZL ££8'6Z9'EL
1
d. (Z80'0LL) 648'6Z9
00 990'0 L L'£ L 0sagunoO le�na
LSL'86b
L00'069
Z9£'££b
Z LL'8Z8
099`98 L'Z
LSL L9£'L
E6L'8L4
(9ZE'090' L)
LS6`6Z9`4
Z08'£08
LZ9'4 Z
(ZZ9'9E L'4)
£6£'£S t
0 L Z' 9ZS Z
908' S L L' Z
(ZE0 `644'4 L)
(L8L'L98`09)
(LPL 'EZ9'0E)
(6Z9' 680'4 L )
(E8L'8L)
(£99'Z04'Z)
OL9'99VOL
/� (Z4Z'SOZ'ZE)
(SSZ`69L)
49L'996
069'L46'Z
%S £9
%6 L9
%4'E8
%L 8L
%0'£ L
%4 ES
%9'8S
%4'40 L
%9'L9
%L'ZL
6L8'898
6EL' OZ L' L
006' LL L `Z
EEL'£8 L
686'SZE
L06199' L
964'9L9
sL8'S0Z'OE
LZ9'949'6
66l'44 L' Z
9£9'L9E' L
()Pt() L8' L
£SZ' L L9'Z
944' Z L 0' L
6E9' L LSZ
899 9E6'Z
68Z'SSL`L
LL8'0£6'8Z
489'9LZ'4 L
L 00' 846' Z
L6Z'LE8 %Z'LLL L96'ZL4'LI- 8E0`6E4'9
%L 96 E04'96£'E L6L'849'E
%869 LLL'Z48'S L8E`L9£'8
%9'E9 S4E'EOL'E 09L'6L8'9
049'4Z6'Z %OOL+ 6ZSZLZ'EL 0, (ZVI.`L91-'4)
49L'46Z'OL %46EZ 8L6'ZL0'90L LZO'L98'E4
994'86L'9 %9'64£ 9Z9'8L9'L9 EZO'LSC41.
E68' LS8'Z %S LOZ 966'LOL'Z£ s SL4'99L'9L
L46'SL %817LL L8£'9EL ZS9'049
EZ£'984 %£ 80L L69Z£81£ 9LL'E46'4£
- %6'88 L4L'08£'1.8 s L9L'949'L6
889'8L9'9 %OELZ £84`L66'ZL 1799'L9Z'4E
ZLL'SSL %Z'61.L OL6'4£L'S EL6'608'4
%6 L8 996'066'9 0, 60L'L96'L
%l'9£ L8£' I-99' L LLO'E09`17
(66Z'E)
I
(949'9 0
(LZS'4l)
(406'SZ)
(LSC4)
(SLL'S4)
(4S6' L L)
(066'6)
(ZSL'E£Z)
(80 L `S£ L )
(69L' Z L )
00' L8Z'48£' L Leweyal
L80'0Z9 OO 4L L'90Z' L Lauwnlonl
Z6E'464 00'49L'Z4L'Z LepeneN
940'LZ9 00'98L'96E LesodueW
(60Z'6L8) 00ZZS'9E4'E ,leuadwl
909'Z96L
L88'6££
L06'9L9'LL
LOL`9L9'E
909'E L6' L
OO L00'986
00 86E`SZ8
OO LZL'849'LL
00'1789`S6L' 0 L
00'99 L'L40' L
LseJenele0
Liopewy
eJnluan
eJelnl
aoyel
(ELL'ZLL) (SLL'SS£'9) OOSZ80L6'ZL snelsluelg
(4£b'04) (448'04) 00'17L0'0£9'£ znu0 ewes
1 (£Z£`99) 4ES'069'Z °OILLZb8'S aleqpe8 ewes
(OZL'OL) (6L6'E) 00'6b8'£68'9 odslgo sml ueS
(ZSL'OEZ) (909'0LE'LZ) 00'9L9`8LZ'LL 0, wnbeo( ueS
I (09E'ZL6' l) (999'OLZ'ZOL) 00 E40'40L'84L (01W) eaay Ae9 d S
(E08'8L8) (SL£'64E'OS) 00'L4L`S86'S9 o6alO ueg
(E06'9L9) (09Z'Z£L'LZ) 001E9'9L9'L9 9oulpJewa8 ueS
I (LL9'8) (mini.) 00'649'E9L ol!uasueS
(8ZL'£69) (966'8Z4'9L) 00'048'S90'ZS (000VS) oluawe�oeg
(LLS'6ZL) 890'Z64'6Z 00 40Z'48L'4S 9apls�anlb
(£96'0L0'L) (9L0'8L9'04) 00'ZZ9'968'9L a6uel0
(L96'E9) (LLL'498) 0090L'8EL'9 Awaluon
• (LSL'8L) 94L'ZL8'L 00'0ZL'4ZE'9 0, peoJaW
(L60'94) 844`I-Z6 00'9ZL'LZL`E eJepeW
(9L81Z4'£9)
LZ9' £E L
6L0' E9 L'6
(Z99'89 L'Z)
60Z'8S8
S9£'4L8'0L
Ob6'8£b
%9'0Z L
%E'96
%8'49
%Z'60 L
%8 L8
8L8' L64'9LE
844'8S4`E
ZEE' Z88' 9 L
SLE'L88'0£
9L4'648'E
869'64ZZ LE
SLO'Z6S'E
ZL4'S40`9Z
EL8'6LZ`8Z
SZ9'LOL'4
• 66Z'E
1
(90Z'Z6Z'£)
(44L'94)
(645'99Z)
(L84ZLE)
( L 94' Z9)
Z8E' LL L'89
(84£'64 L)
L4E'SZO'L
LE9'8 L L'9
(Z9L'9b£)
OO EZZ'L9£'L4Z
OO L9L'88L'£
00 £ L 9'9LZ'6l
00'8 LL'EL4'EZ
00 848' 9 L L' S
sele6uy sol
s6uN
weN
ousaid
aAng
sVO 999'96L'LS paianllaa £L/OE/610 se ey0 : lasgoBupund 6 EL/ZLOZ Add : duawlsnfpy 6A.lanllaaJapu0 ,y0
lenloy Luognquls!pay VO suolle6pg0 lenloV I luawssassy wewssessy I 4y6!siano -.1an° ZLOZ Add ELOZ AAA
ELOZ Add lsn6ny lenlab' £LOZ Add ELOZ Add `• spaaN 211'91 sPaaN H'891 `• £LOZ Add .104 VO £LOZ Add IenPV
eouele9 ELOZ Add luaaad palsnfpy col uo!lnquluo0 . of weLuTsnfpy
uo!6ab
ELOZ `0£ Jegwevies Jo se spun] VO elnwuod
tianJaa eoue;slssy leool
£ L - Z LOZ AAA
FFY 2012-13
Local Assistance Delivery
Formula OA Funds as of September 30, 2013
Information:
< This September 30, 2013 report is based on the Department's Federal Aid Data System (FADS) transactions.
< Obligations include obligations, deobligations, exchanges, and Federal Transit Administration transfers (FTAs).
Footnotes:
The Locals' FFY 2012-13 Actual OA and August Redistribution amounts are based on the amounts provided by the Department's Federal Resources Office (FRO) on October 18, 2013. Actual Local OA
is $1,227,983,692 with adjustments to/for: 1. Remove Local Rail OA from FRO base Loral OA (-$7,260,530); FRO retains all Rail OA and apportionments, 2. FHWA Prior Year retum (Local share =-$1,496,425), 3.
FHWA Adjustment to Formula Limit (Local Share = +$4,547,663), and 4. FHWA Adjustment for Other Allocated Limit (Local Share = +$7,975,398). Also, an additional $57,795,655 of OA provided from FHWA via the
August Redistribution process.
2 Balance of FFY 2012 OA (last FFY's OA balance) — This is the amount a Region/Program must pay back if it over delivered or the amount a Region/Program will receive to "make whole" if under delivered based on the Division of Local
Assistance's (DLA's) OA Management Policy. Amounts shown in parenthesis are amounts owed and positive (non -parenthesis numbers) amounts are to be repaid to Regions/Programs.
3 Required by Sections 182.6(n) and 182.7(k) of the California Streets and Highways Code. This oversight amount has been revised with the September 30, 2013 OA report to: 1) base the calculation on the FFY 2013 revised advance
apportionments dated February 22, 2013, and 2) to lower the total amount by $250 to $11,329,500.
" This is the FFY 2013 adjusted actual base OA, which includes adjustments for FFY 2012 OA Over or Under Delivery, the Oversight Adjustment, and contribution for the LS&R Needs Assessment.
5 Balance of FFY 2013 actual OA per date of report — This is the balance of FFY 2013 OA at the close of the FFY and this is the amount a Region/Program must pay back if over delivered or the amount a Region/Program will receive to
"make whole" if under delivered based on DLA's OA Management Policy. Amounts shown in parentheses are amounts owed back and positive (non -parentheses) amounts are amounts owed to those Regions/Programs.
6 Per the August 1, 2006 MOU between Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and the San Bemardino Associated Govemments (SANBAG), the FFY 2006 OA for these two regions was adjusted in September 2006 to reflect
an OA loan of $16,000,000. The loan decreased RCTC's FFY 2006 OA and increased SANBAG's FFY 2006 OA by $16,000,000. The August 1, 2006 memo states that the repayment of the OA to RCTC from SANBAG is anticipated in FFY
2009 or FFY 2010. Upon direction from these Regions, repayment was applied in FFY 2012 (50% - applied October 2011) and FFY 2013 (50% - applied October 2012).
▪ The Rural Counties' subtotal above excludes those rural counties receiving CMAQ beginning in FFY 2006. This amount now includes Tehama as of the May 31, 2013 report per Caltrans' Division of Transportation Programming's revised
Advance apportionments dated February 22, 2013.
e Based on the September 30, 2012 (FFY 2012) year-end reconciliation (please see September 30, 2012, OA delivery report for details on this amount). This results in an adjustment to the Locals' OA for this FFY (FFY 2013). This amount
reduces the Locals' OA balance.
9 Received agreements from Region(s) for the Local Streets and Roads (LS&R) Statewide Needs Assessment Funding Concurrence.
10 June 27, 2013 Letter of Understanding between San Joaquin Council of Govemments (SJCOG) and Merced County Association of Govemments (MCAG) to transfer $101,000 of CMAQ apportionments
and OA in FFY 2013 from MCAG to SJCOG to support the rideshare project.
Prepared by John Flores
November 5, 2013
As of 1/16/2014
DRAFT FFY 2013/2014 OBLIGATION PLAN R\iT\r
z Com y Iransponoton Cornmasion
Agency
FTIP ID
Project Location
Project Scope/Description
RFA Subm. To
Caltrans D-8
CMAQ
STP-L
Funding
Phase
Project
Phase
FTIP FY
2013/14
Comments
Indio
47520
I-10/Jefferson
IC Project
$14,499,925
Con
ROW
Y
May use EPSP
Corona
RIV041047
Magnolia & El Camino Ave
TE project
7/1/2014
$943,000
Con
ROW
Y
Riverside County
RIV050534
I-215/Newport Blvd
IC Project
$14,625,000
Con
ROW
Y
May use EPSP
Beaumont
RIV050535
SR60/Potrero Blvd. Interchange Ph.I
IC Project
8/15/2013
$8,929,000
Con
ROW
Y
Calimesa
RIV060116
I-10/Cherry Valley IC
PA&ED
$443,000
Eng
Eng
Y
May use EPSP
Palm Desert
RIV071243
Free rt - Fred Waring/111
Reconfigure Right Turn
8/15/2013
$531,000
Con
ROW
Y
Palm Springs
RIV071258
Traffic Management Ctr
TMC
5/17/2013
51,644,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Riverside County
RIV071288
Ave 66 GS
Grade Separation
12/1/2013
$350,000
Eng
PA&ED
Y
Moreno Valley
RIV080904
SR60/Theodore St IC
PA&ED
$964,000
Eng
Eng
Y
Palm Springs
RIV091205
Farrell Dr RT Ln @ Vista Chino
Intersection Improvements
5/24/2013
$369,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Riverside
RIV110116
Quiet Zone X-ing Imp
Crossing improvements
8/1/2013
$7,000,000
Con
PS&E
Y
Caltrans
RIV110122
1-215 SB Connector
3rd MFL and Aux Lanes
$1,225,000
Riverside County
RIV110302
1-10 in the City of Blythe
New W/B on and off ramps
$810,000
Con
PS&E
Y
Banning
RIV130401
Ramsey St. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$182,000
Con
Y
Beaumont
RIV130401
8th Street Resurfacing, Restoration, and
Rehabilitation
Pavement Rehab
$220,000
Con
Y
Calimesa
RIV130401
Calimesa and Avenue L Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
554,000
Con
Y
Corona
RIV130401
Ontario Ave Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$832,000
Con
Y
Eastvale
RIV130401
Schleisman Ave. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$199,000
Con
Y
Hemet
RIV130401
Gilbert St. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$443,000
Con
Y
Jurupa Valley
RIV130401
Van Buren Blvd. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$387,000
Con
Y
Lake Elsinore
RIV130401
Gunnerson St. Pavement Rehabilitation
Pavement Rehab
$286,000
Con
Y
Moreno Valley
RIV130401
Frederick St. and Elsworth St. Pavement
Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$1,084,000
Con
Y
Murrieta
RIV130401
Jefferson Ave. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$593,000
Con
Y
Norco
RIV130401
Pavement Overlay - Various Locations
Pavement Rehab
$178,000
Con
Y
Riverside
RIV130401
Indiana Ave. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$1,810,000
Con
Y
Riverside County
RIV130401
Rancho California Rd. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$2,634,000
Con
Y
San Jacinto
RIV130401
San Jacinto Ave Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$290,000
Con
Y
Temecula
RIV130401
Winchester Rd. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$646,000
Con
Y
Wildomar
RIV130401
Clinton Keith Rd Slurry Seal
Pavement Rehab
$136,000
Con
Y
Blythe
RIV130402
N. Broadway Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$150,000
Con
Y
Cathedral City
RIV130402
East Palm Canyon Dr. Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$337,000
Con
Y
Coachella
RIV130402
Grapefruit Blvd. Pavement
Rehabilitation/Reconstruction
Pavement Rehab
$215,000
Con
Y
Desert Hot Springs
RIV130402
Hacienda Ave & Mission Lakes Blvd. Surface
Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$182,000
Con
Y
indian Wells
RIV130402
Cook Street Rubberized Overlay
Pavement Rehab
$135,000
Con
Y
Indio
RIV130402
Old Hwy 111 Pavement Reconstruction
Pavement Rehab
$477,000
Con
Y
La Quinta
RIV130402
Washington St. Improvements
Pavement Rehab
$250,000
Con
Y
Palm Desert
RIV130402
Portola Ave. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$336,000
Con
Y
Palm Springs
RIV130402
Ramon Rd. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$396,000
Con
Y
Rancho Mirage
RIV130402
Old Hwy 111 Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$162,000
Con
Y
Riverside County
RIV130402
62nd Street Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
$605,000
Con
Y
1
As of 1/16/2014
Agency
FTIP ID
Project Location
Project Scope/Description
RFA Subm. To
Caltrans D-8
CMAQ
STP-L
Funding
Phase
Project
Phase
FTIP FY
2013/14
Comments
Riverside
RIV131202
Adams St at 91 IC
PA&ED
$935,000
Eng
Y
May use EPSP
Moreno Valley
RIV151204
Aqueduct Trail Missing Segments
PA&ED
$340,000
Eng
Y
May use EPSP
Wildomar
RIV151213
Grand Ave Bike Lanes
Bike Lanes
$614,000
Con
Y
May use EPSP
Temecula
RIV62029
Park and Ride Facility
Park and Ride Facility
$1,301,000
Con
Y
May use EPSP
EllPending Obligation
Need Additional Information
RFA to be submitted to Caltrans
$5,592,000 $63,149,925
2
AGENDA ITEM 8
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 27, 2014
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director
SUBJECT:
2013 Multi -Funding Call for Projects Approval
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
On January 8, 2014, the Commission unanimously approved staff and the TAC
recommendations for the Multi -Funding Call for Projects that included Congestion Mitigation
and Air Quality, Surface Transportation Program (STP), as well as Measure A regional
Arterial for the Western County. The infusion of federal and Measure A funds into our
recovering economy is $164.5 million for state highway, regional arterials, air quality
programs/projects. The next steps will include incorporating the funding into the 2013 FTIP
(ongoing), preparing the Memorandums of Understandings between RCTC and the local
agencies for project delivery and establishing the policy for project savings.
In the upcoming months, staff will be contacting you to provide updates on the 2013 FTIP as
well as providing guidance through the federal aid process to obligate the funding (as
needed). The new funding sources from this Call for Projects will be incorporated into the
2013 FTIP through the upcoming formal amendment No. 17, due to SCAG on February 25 or
the Administrative Modification No. 18, due to SCAG on April 29. Anticipated approval of
Amendment No. 17 is end of April 2014 and mid to late May for Administrative Modification
No. 18.
The success of this call for projects will shape up the process for upcoming call for projects,
including the project delivery records for future agency scoring. Staff on a regular basis will
monitor the progress of the projects through the FundTrack Project Milestone Reports.
Thanks for all your participation and support.
Attachment: 2013 Multi -Funding Call for Projects Results
2013 MULTI -FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS
DRAFT
Lead
Agency/Applicant
Project
Title
Funding
Requested
Agency match
Agency
match %
TCC
TPC (all phases)
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
FY 2015/16
FY 2016/17 Start Cons
1(mo/yr)
FTIP INCLUSION
Calimesa
I-10/Cherry Valley IC
Improvements (PA&ED)
$443,000
$57,000
11.40%
2,000,000
2,000,000
443,000
Jan. 2014
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
Eastvale
Hamner Ave Traffic
Synchronization from
Schleisman Rd to Eastvale
Gateway
$216,775
$116,725
35.00%
333,500
383,300
216,775
Feb. 2015
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
Moreno Valley
Transportation Management
Center - Ph IB
$2,031,700
$268,300
11.67%
2,300,000
2,400,000
2,031,700
Jan. 2015
2013 FTIP-A17
AND 2015 FTIP
Moreno Valley
Dynamic Traveler Alert Message
Boards
$340,500
$44,500
11.57%
384,500
450,000
340,500
Jan. 2015
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
Moreno Valley
Aqueduct Trail - Eucalyptus Ave
to Lake Perris State Recreational
Area
$340,000
$85,000
20.00%
425,000
425,000
340,000
Jan. 2014
2013 FTIP -A17
AND 2015 FTIP
Riverside
Magnolia Ave. Signal
Interconnect
$1,387,500
$462,500
25.00%
1,850,000
1,855,500
1,387,500
June-15
2013 FTIP-A17
AND 2015 FTIP
Riverside
Riverside Metrolink Station and
Metrolink Downtown Crossing
SR91(PA&ED)
$637,500
$112,500
15.00%
750,000
750,000
637,500
Feb. 2014
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
Riverside
Santa Ana River Trail Walking
Path
$2,376,000
$594,000
20.00%
2,970,000
3,250,000
2,376,000
Sep. 2015
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
Riverside
Santa Ana River Bicycle Trail
$141,450
$47,150
25.00%
188,600
223,600
141,450
Sep. 2015
2013 FTIP-A17
AND 2015 FTIP
AS OF 12/06/2013
CMAQ PROJECTS
2013 MULTI -FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS
DRAFT
Lead
Agency/Applicant
Project
Title
Funding
Requested
Agency match
Agency
match %
TCC
TPC (all phases)
FY 2013/14
FY 2014/15
FY 2015/16
FY 2016/17 Start Cons
(mo/yr)
FTIP INCLUSION
Riverside
Bicycle Share Program
$240,000
$60,000
22.69% 264,450
300,000
9,480
230,520
Feb. 2014,
Sept 2014,
and Feb.
2015
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
Riverside
Riverside County
Bruce Street Sidewalk
Improvements - Adair Ave. to
Lake St.
$195,000
$195,000
50.00%
390,000
402,500
195,000
June-15
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
Salt Creek Parkway
$5,090,000
$892,000
14.91%
5,982,000
6,405,000
5,090,000
May-15
2013 FTIP-A17
AND 2015 FTIP
RTA
RapidLink Service along
University and Magnolia
$9,211,800
$3,070,600
25.00%
12,282,400
12,282,400
9,211,800
Jan. 2014
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
RTA
Installation of a system -wide
Intelligent Transportation
System (ITS) for Transit
$4,125,000
$1,375,000
25.00%
5,500,000
5,500,000
4,125,000
May-14
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
Temecita
Temecula Park and Ride
$1,300,750
$698,250
34.93%
1,999,000
2,365,000
1,300,750
Sep. 2014
2013 FTIP - A16
AND 2015 FTIP
Wildomar
Grand Ave & Clinton Keith Rd.
Bike Paths
$613,800
$204,600
25.00%
818,400
949,500
613,800
Feb. 2015
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
Wildomar
Grand Ave Bike Paths - Corydon
Rd to Brown Middle School.
$746,640
$131,760
15.00%
878,400
1,019,100
746,640
IFeb. 2016
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
$29,437,415
$977,500
$3,976,475
$2,376,000
$0:
*Based on programming capacity as of Administrative Modification No.16
AS OF 12/06/2013
CMAQ PROJECTS
S.031-021d OVVO £TOZ/90/ZT d0 SV
SIVL£Z'9S$
000'008'9Z $
000'008`9Z $
'I
dlIJ STOZ ONV
LTV - dlld £TOZ
9TOZ/T/L
000'008`9Z $
000'Z8Z'ITT $
000'VVL'96 $
%0£'ZL
0007176'69 $
000'008'9Z $
Neal llggeb per lo;saM
saw
LV'T 01 pa sSuudS uewn9 wail
09-21S uo saue3 8ulgwl19 prui
suegie0
NOISMDNl Mid
(JA/ow)
i
suo0 �+e35'I
LI/9TOZ Ad
9i/STOZ Ad
Si/VIOZ Ad
Vi/£TOZ Ad
(saseyd Ile) Da
»1
% y3;ew
A3ua2V
anew A3uaft
po sanbaa
8wpund
elll1
I pafoid
I weallddV/Ama2V
pea3
1dV210
SID3rOlid a03llbD 9NIaNniiilf1W £TOZ
2013 MULTI -FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS - RSTP / MARA EVALUATION AND SCHEDULE
DRAFT
Lead
Agency/Applicant
Project
Title
Funding
Requested
Agency
match
Agency
match %
TCC
TPC (all
phases)
Start Cons
(mo/yr)
Total
Project
ire
IN FTIP
RTPID
FTIP INCLUSION
FORMAL/
ADMINISTRATIVE
AMENDMENT
ANTICIPATED
2013 FTIP
APPROVAL
PROGRAM FUNDING YEAR*
FFY=FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR
Indio
1-10/Jefferson St. lc
Improvements
$14,499,925
$47,173,575
76.49%
61,673,500
74,033,500
May-14
40
47520
47520
2013 FTIP -A17
AND 2015 FTIP
FORMAL
4/25/2014
FFY 15/16
San Jacinto**
Ramona Exp. Widening from
Eagle Rd. to Main St
$2,675,000
$3,27o,000
55.00%
5,945,000
6,545,000
April-14
35
RIV120203
3AL204
IN FTIP
NOT REQUIRED
FFY 13/14
Riverside County**
Clinton Keith Road Extension
from Whitewood Rd. to Leon
Rd. (Ph II)
$16,500,000
$22,978,000
58.20%
39,478,000
57,780,000
Sep. 2014
35
RIV011236
RIV011236
IN FTIP
NOT REQUIRED
FFY 13/14
Riverside County
I-215/NewportIC
Improvements
$14,625,000
$17,875,000
55.00%
32,500,000
37,300,000
Aug. 2014
33
1111/050534
RIV050534
2013FTIP -A16
AND 2015 FTIP
ADMINISTRATIVE
MODIFICATION
12/30/2013
FFY 14/15
Perris**
I-215/Nuevo Rd IC Ramp
Improvements
$1,600,000
$2,000,000
55.56%
3,600,000
3,600,000
Feb. 2014
31
RIV131006
3M04WT014
2015 FTIP
FORMAL
12/30/2014
FFY 13/14
Beaumont
SR60/ Potrero IC Ph.1
$6,523,154
$8,662,846
57.04%
15,186,000
27,186,000
Jan. 2014
31
RIV050535
RIV050535
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
FORMAL
4/25/2014
FFY 13/14
Indio
Hwy 111 Improvements -
Rubidoux St. to 760' W/O
Madison St
$4,680,000
$5,720,000
55.00%
10,400,000
10,920,000
June-15
30
RIV153001
3A07031
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
FORMAL
4/25/2014
FFY 16/17
Riverside
Magnolia Ave. Widening -
Buchanan St. to Banbury Dr.
$2,620,000
$3,410,000
56.60%
6,025,000
6,326,200
March-15
30
RIV151216
REG0703
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
FORMAL
4/25/2014
FFY 15/16
Temecula
Interstate 15/SR79 South IC
$12,976,100
$15,860,000
55.00%
28,836,100
46,0013,942
Dec. 2014
28
118/62031
RIV62031
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
FORMAL
4/25/2014
FFY 14/15, FFY 15/16
Riverside County
Cajalco Rd. Widening and
Safety Enhancements -
Temescal Canyon Rd. to 1-215
(PA&ED)
$3,000,000
$8,000,000.
72.73% 11,000,000
302,367,000
Jan.2011
RIV090903,
3A04WT137A
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015FTIP
1 FORMAL
�%25i2S71_
FF716/17
Page No.1
As of 12/09/2013
RSTP/MARA
2013 MULTI -FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS - RSTP / MARA EVALUATION AND SCHEDULE
DRAFT
1
Lead Ptoject
Agency/Applicant Tide
Funding
Requested
Agency
match
Agency
match %
TCC
TPC (all
phases)
Phases)
Start Cons
(mo/yr)
Total
Project
Score
IN FTIP
RTPID
FTIP INCLUSION
FORMAL/
ADMINISTRATIVE
AMENDMENT
ANTICIPATED
2013 FTIP
APPROVAL
PROGRAM FUNDING YEAR*
FFY FISCAL YEAR
Moreno Valley
SR60/Theodore St IC
Improvements (PA&ED)
$964,000
$1,178,000
55.00%
2,142,000
48,200,000
July-13
RIV080904
3M0801
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
FORMAL
4/25/2014
FFY 13/14
Riverside
Adams St at SR91-Ramp
Reconfiguration (PA&ED)
$935,000
$165,000
15.00%
1,100,000
1,100,000
Feb. 2014
RIV131202
712003
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 MP
FORMAL
4/25/2014
FFY 14/15
Coachella
Avenue 48 Widening and
Bicycle and Pedestrian
Facilities -Jackson St. to Van
Buren St
$2,278,250
$1,226,750
35.00%
3,505,000
3,600,000
July-14
27
RIV151217
3A07057
2013 FTIP - A17
AND 2015 FTIP
FORMAL
4/25/2014
FFY 15/16
Jurupa Valley**
Limonite Ave Widening -
Etiwanda to Bain
51,882,000
$2,325,000
55.27%
4,207,000
4,207,000
July-14
27
NO
NOT REQUIRED
NOT REQUIRED
FFY 13/14
Moreno Valley**
Cactus Ave Widening - EB
from Veterans Way to
Heacock St. / Signal
Sychronization
$1,527,500
$822,500
35.00%
2,350,000
2,350,000
Sep.2014
27
RIV071240
RIV071240
IN FTIP
NOT REQUIRED
FFY 13/14
Corona**
Foothill Parkway Westerly
Extension
$21,000,000
$35,500,000
62.83%
56,500,000
56,500,000
Jan-14
N/A
RIV010209
RIV010209
IN FTIP
NOT REQUIRED
FFY 13/14
$108,285,929
** = CEQA ONLY
Page No. 2
As of 12/09/2013
RSTP/MARA
AGENDA ITEM 9
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 27, 2014
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director
SUBJECT:
2014 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Submittal
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
On December 11, 2013, staff submitted the Riverside County 2014 STIP - Regional
Transportation Improvement Program to the California Transportation Commission. The
submittal included two carryover state highway projects from the 2012 STIP, two new state
highway project improvements, the B Canyon Wildlife Crossing, the CVLink, and funding
increase for the Project Programming and Monitoring, fully programming Riverside County's
apportionment of $69,696,000. The attached summary provides the listing of projects
nominated by our Commission for STIP funding.
The STIP adoption is scheduled for March 20, 2014. Staff will continue working with SCAG,
incorporating the 2014 STIP funding into the 2013 Federal Transportation Improvement
Program (FTIP).
SUMMARY OF 2014 STIP COUNTY SHARE PROPOSALS
Does Not Include ITIP Interregional Share Funding (See Separate Listing)
($1,000's)
Riverside
Project Totals by Fiscal Year
Project Totals by Component
Agency
Rte
PPNo
Project
Ext
Del.
Voted
Total
Prior
14-15
15-16
16-17
17-18
18-19
RNV
Const
E & P
PS&E
ww sup
con sup
STIP Projects at Fund Estimate (August 2013)
RCTC
loc
77J
Rt 91 Improvement (design-build)(08S-58)(ext 6-12)
Jul-13
Mar-13
2,000
2,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,000
0
0
0
0
RCTC
9803
Planning, programming, and monitoring
May-13
664
664
0
0
0
0
0
0
664
0
0
0
0
Ca!trans
15
21K
French Valley Parkway interchange
31,545
0
0
31,545
19,510
0
0
0
0
14,245
0
0
0
17,300
Riverside Co.
loc
53A
Rt 10, Jefferson St WC, widen OC (construction)
19,510
0
0
0
0
0
0
19,510
0
0
Cr
0
RCTC
9803
Planning, programming, and monitoring
2,655
664
664
664
663
0
0
0
2,655
0
0
0
0
RCTC
rail
1114
Perris Valley Line, commuter rail extnsn (08S-35)(ext 6-11)
Feb-13
Dec-12
52,978
52,978
0
0
0
0
0
0
52,978
0
0
0
0
RCTC
1112 -
TE.reserve
4,700
1,600
0
0
3,100
0
0
0
4,700
0
0
0
0
_res,
-
J
_
Total Programmed or Voted since July 1, 2012
114,052
PROPOSED 2014 PROGRAMMING
Highway Proiect Proposals
Riverside Co.
loc
53A
Rt 10, Jefferson St I/C, widen OC (construction)
-19,510
0
0
-19,510
0
0
0
0
-19,510
0
0
0
0
Riverside Co.
loc
53A
Rt 10, Jefferson St DC, widen OC (construction)
33,310
0
33,310
0
0
0
0
0
33,310
0
0
0
0
Ca!trans
15
21K
French Valley Parkway interchange
-31,545
0
0
-31,545
0
0
0
0
-14,245
0
0
0
-17,300
Caltrans
15
21K
French Valley Parkway interchange
41,545
0
0
41,545
0
0
0
0
24,245
0
0
0
17,300
Ca!trans
60
46J
Truck Climbing/Descending Lnw/shoulderimprov.(SHOPP)
NEW
32,105
0
7,550
24,555
0
0
0
200
18,755
0
7,000
350
5,800
Caftans
91
71E
B Canyon Wildlife Crossing Corridor
NEW
1,480
0
1,300
180
0
0
0
80
0
100
1,200
100
0
RCTC
loc
108T
Rt 215 South Bound Connector (SHOPP)
NEW
8,975
0
0
0
10
8,965
0
10
8,965
0
0
0
0
RCTC
9803
Planning, programming, and monitoring
-2,655
-664
-664
-664
-663
0
0
0
-2,655
0
0
0
0
RCTC
9803
Planning, programming, and monitoring
3,991
664
664
664
663
668
668
0
3,991
0
0
0
0
Subtotal, Highway Projects
67,696
0
42,160
15,225
10
9,633
668
290
522 856
100
8,200
450
5 800
Bicycle and Pedestrian
Project
Proposals:
CVAG
loc
1019
CV Link Palm Springs -Coachella, multiuse path (Ph1)
NEW
2,000
0
0
0
0
2,000
0
0
2,000
0
0
0
0
RCTC
res
1112
TE reserve
Delete
-4,700
-1,600
0
0
-3,100
0
0
0
-4,700
0
0
0
0
RCTC
res
1112
TE reserve
1,600
1,600
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,600
0
0
0
0
Subtotal Bike & Ped Projects
-1,100
0
0
0
-3,f00-
Zb60
-0-
Cr
-1-,100
Cr-
0
0
0
Total Proposed 2014 STIP Programming
66,596
0
42,160
15,225
-3,090
11,633
668
290
51,756
100
8,200
450
5,800
Nominated Projects Not Included in Staff Recommendations
Notes:
RTIP adopted 11/13/13
Balance of STIP County Share, Riverside
Total County Share, June 30, 2013
Total Now Programmed or Voted Since July 1, 2012
Unprogrammed Share Balance
Share Balance Advanced or Overdrawn
129,432
114,052
15,380
0
Proposed New Programming
Target
Maximum
66,596
69,696
98,571
Under (Over) Target
California Transportation Commission
3,100
Page 1 of 1
tJ1fi{2014
AGENDA ITEM 10
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 27, 2014
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager
SUBJECT:
Active Transportation Program — CTC Draft Guidelines for Statewide
and MPO Funding and Upcoming Call for Projects
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
RCTC has been actively participating and monitoring the development of the Draft Active
Transportation Program (ATP) Guidelines prepared for the California Transportation
Commission (CTC) adoption on March 20. Two hearings are required before the ATP
Guidelines are approved the CTC. The first hearing took place in Los Angeles on January
22. The second hearing is scheduled for January 29 in Sacramento. The following is the
proposed schedule for the adoption of the guidelines as well as the Call for Projects FY 2014.
Guidelines submitted to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee
CTC adopts ATP Guidelines
Call for Projects
Project applications to Caltrans
Large MPOs submit optional guidelines to Caltrans
CTC approves or rejects MPO guidelines
Staff Recommendations for statewide and rural/small urban ATP
CTC adopts statewide and rural/small urban ATP
Projects not programmed distributed to large MPOs based on
Location
MPO project programming recommendations to the CTC
CTC adopts MPO selected projects
Feb. 3, 2014
March 20, 2014
March 21, 2014
May 21, 2014
May 21, 2014
June 25, 2014
Aug. 8, 2014
Aug. 20, 2014
Aug. 20, 2014
Sep. 30, 2014
Nov. 2014
DRAFT
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
GUIDELINES
4\)
1/17/14
CONTENTS
Introduction 1
Background 1
Program Goals 1
Program Schedule 1
Funding 2
Source 2
Distribution 2
Matching Requirements 3
Funding For Active Transportation Plans 4
Reimbursement 4
Eligibility 4
Eligible Applicants 4
Partnering with Implementating Agencies 5
Eligible Projects 5
Minimum Request for Funds 5
Example Projects 6
Project Type Requirements 7
Disadvantaged Communities 7
Safe Routes to School Projects 7
Recreational Trails Projects 8
Technical Assistance Resource Center 8
Project Selection Process 8
Project Application 8
Sequential Project Selection 9
MPO Competitive Project Selection 9
Screening Criteria 9
Scoring Criteria 10
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) i
Project Evaluation Committee 11
Programming 11
Project Programming 11
Allocations 12
Project Delivery 13
Project Inactivity 14
Project Reporting 14
Roles and Responsibilities 15
California Transportation Commission (Commission) 15
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) 15
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) with large urbanized areas 16
Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPAs) outside an MPO with Large Urbanized Areas and
an MPO without Large Urbanized Areas 16
Project Applicant 17
Active Transportation Plan 17
Federal Requirements 18
Design Standards 19
Program Evaluation 19
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) ii
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
The Active Transportation Program was created by Senate Bill 99 (Chapter 359, Statutes of 2013) and
Assembly Bill 101 (Chapter 354, Statutes of 2013) to encourage increased use of active modes of
transportation, such as biking and walking.
These guidelines describe the policy, standards, criteria, and procedures for the development, adoption
and management of the Active Transportation Program. The guidelines were developed in consultation
with the Active Transportation Program Workgroup. The workgroup includes representatives from
Caltrans, other government agencies, and active transportation stakeholder organizations with expertise
in pedestrian and bicycle issues, including Safe Routes to School programs.
The California Transportation Commission (Commission) must hold at least two public hearings prior to
adopting the Active Transportation Program guidelines. The Commission may amend the adopted
guidelines after conducting at least one public hearing. The Commission must make a reasonable effort
to amend the guidelines prior to a call for projects or may extend the deadline for project submission in
order to comply with the amended guidelines.
PROGRAM GOALS
Pursuant to statute, the goals of the Active Transportation Program are to achieve:
• Increase the proportion of trips accomplished by biking and walking.
• Increase the safety and mobility of non -motorized users.
• Advance the active transportation efforts of regional agencies to achieve greenhouse gas
reduction goals as established pursuant to Senate Bill 375 (Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008) and
Senate Bill 391 (Chapter 585, Statutes of 2009).
• Enhance public health, including reduction of childhood obesity through the use of programs
including, but not limited to, projects eligible for Safe Routes to School Program funding.
• Ensure that disadvantaged communities fully share in the benefits of the program.
• Provide a broad spectrum of projects to benefit many types of active transportation users.
PROGRAM SCHEDULE
The guidelines for an initial two-year program of projects must be adopted by March 26, 2014 (within six
months of enactment of the authorizing legislation). No later than 45 days prior to adopting the initial set
of guidelines for the Active Transportation Program, the Commission must submit the draft guidelines to
the Joint Legislative Budget Committee.
Subsequent programs must be adopted not later than April 1 of each odd -numbered year, however, the
Commission may alternatively elect to adopt a program annually.
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 1
The following schedule lists the major milestones for the development and adoption of the 2014 Active
Transportation Program:
Commission adopts Fund Estimate
Guidelines hearing, South
Guidelines hearing, North
Guidelines submitted to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee
Commission adopts Active Transportation Program Guidelines
Call for projects
Project applications to Caltrans
Large MPOs submit optional guidelines to Caltrans
Commission approves or rejects MPO guidelines
Staff recommendation for statewide and rural/small urban portions of the program
Commission adopts statewide and rural/small urban portions of the program
Projects not programmed distributed to large MPOs based on location
Deadline for MPO project programming recommendations to the Commission
Commission adopts MPO selected projects
December 11, 2013
January 22, 2014
January 29, 2014
February 3, 2014
March 20, 2014
March 21, 2014
May 21, 2014
May 21, 2014
June 25, 2014
August 8, 2014
August 20, 2014
August 20, 2014
September 30, 2014
November 2014
SOURCE
The Active Transportation Program is funded from various federal and state funds appropriated in the
annual Budget Act. These are:
• 100% of the federal Transportation Alternative Program funds, except for federal Recreation Trail
Program funds appropriated to the Department of Parks and Recreation.
• $21 million of federal Highway Safety Improvement Program funds or other federal funds.
• State Highway Account funds.
In addition to furthering the goals of this program, all Active Transportation Program projects must meet
eligibility requirements specific to at least one of the Active Transportation Program's funding sources.
DISTRIBUTION
State and federal law segregate the Active Transportation Program into multiple, overlapping
components. The Active Transportation Program Fund Estimate must indicate the funds available for
each of the program components. Consistent with these requirements, the Active Transportation Program
funds must be distributed as follows:
1. Forty percent to Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) in urban areas with populations
greater than 200,000.
These funds must be distributed based on total coup-ty MPO population. The funds programmed
and allocated under this paragraph must be selected through a competitive process by the MPOs
in accordance with these guidelines.
Projects selected by MPOs may be in either large urban, small urban, or rural areas.
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 2
25% of the funds distributed to each MPO must benefit disadvantaged communities.
The following statutory requirements apply specifically to the Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG)
• SCAG must consult with county transportation commissions, the Commission, and
Caltrans in the development of competitive project selection criteria.
• The criteria used by SCAG should include consideration of geographic equity, consistent
with program objectives.
• SCAG must place priority on projects that are consistent with plans adopted by local and
regional governments within the county where the project is located.
• SCAG must obtain concurrence from the county transportation commissions.
2. Ten percent to small urban and rural areas with populations of 200,000 or less, with projects
competitively awarded by the Commission to projects in those regions. Federal law segregates
the Transportation Alternative Program into separate small urban and rural competitions based
upon their relative share of the state population. Small Urban areas are those with populations of
5,001 to 200,000. Rural areas are those with populations of 5,000 or less.
25% of the funds in the Small Urban and Rural programs must benefit disadvantaged
communities.
Projects within the boundaries of a MPO with an urban area with a population of greater than
200,000 are not eligible for funding in the Small Urban or Rural programs.
3. Fifty percent to projects competitively awarded by the Commission on a statewide basis.
25% of the funds in the statewide competitive program must benefit disadvantaged communities.
In the initial program, a minimum of $24 million per year of the statewide competitive program is
available for safe routes to schools projects, with at least $7.2 million for non -infrastructure
grants, including funding for a state technical assistance resource center.
MATCHING REQUIREMENTS
Projects must include at least 12 11.47% in matching funds except for projects benefiting a
disadvantaged community, stand-alone non -infrastructure projects and safe routes to schools projects.
The source of the matching funds may be any combination of local, state or federal funds. Matching funds
must be expended in the same project phase (permits and environmental studies; plans, specifications,
and estimates; right-of-way capital outlay; support for right-of-way acquisition; construction capital outlay;
and construction engineering) as the Active Transportation Program funding. Matching funds cannot be
expended prior to the Commission allocation of Active Transportation Program funds. Matching funds,
except matching funds over and above the required .1-2-11.47%, must be expended concurrently and
proportionally to the Active Transportation Program funds.
Large MPOs, in administering a competitive selection process, may require a larger different funding
match for projects selected through their competitive process. Applicants from within a large MPO should
be aware that the match requirements may differ between the MPO and statewide competitive programs.
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 3
FUNDING FOR ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANS
Funding from the Active Transportation Program may be used to fund the development of bike,
pedestrian, safe routes to schools, or active transportation plans in disadvantaged communities.
The Commission intends to set aside up to 5% of the funds in the statewide competitive program and in
the rural and small urban program for funding active transportation plans in disadvantaged communities.
A large MPO, in administering its portion of the program, ehatt may make up to 5% of its funding available
for active transportation plans in disadvantaged communities within the MPO boundaries.
The first priority for the funding of active transportation plans will be for cities, counties, county
transportation commissions, regional transportation planning agencies, MPOs, school districts, or transit
districts that have neither a bicycle plan, a pedestrian plan, a safe routes to schools plan, nor an active
transportation plan. The second priority for the funding of active transportation plans will be for cities,
counties, county transportation commissions, regional transportation planning agencies, or MPOs that
have a bicycle plan or a pedestrian plan but not both.
REIMBURSEMENT
The Active Transportation Program is a reimbursement program for costs incurred. Reimbursement is
requested through the invoice process detailed in Chapter 5, Accounting/Invoices, Local Assistance
Procedures Manual. Costs incurred prior to Commission allocation and, for federally funded projects,
Federal Highway Administration project approval (i.e. Authorization to Proceed) are not eligible for
reimbursement.
ELIGIBILITY
ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS
The applicant for Active Transportation Program funds assumes responsibility and accountability for the
use and expenditure of program funds. Applicants must be able to comply with all the federal and state
laws, regulations, policies and procedures required to enter into a Local Administering Agency -State
Master Agreement (Master Agreement). Refer to Chapter 4, Agreements, of the Local Assistance
Procedures Manual for guidance and procedures on Master Agreements. The following entities, within the
State of California, are eligible to apply for Active Transportation Program funds:
• Local, Regional or State Agencies- Examples include city, county, MPO*, and Regional
Transportation Planning Agency.
• Caltrans*
• Transit Agencies - Any agency responsible for public transportation that is eligible for funds under
the Federal Transit Administration.
• Natural Resource or Public Land Agencies - Federal, Tribal, State, or local agency responsible for
natural resources or public land administration Examples include:
o State or local park or forest agencies
o State or local fish and game or wildlife agencies
o Department of the Interior Land Management Agencies
o U.S. Forest Service
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 4
" P u b l i c s c h o o l s o r S c h o o l d i s t r i c t s
" T r i b a l G o v e r n m e n t s - F e d e r a l l y - r e c o g n i z e d N a t i v e A m e r i c a n T r i b e s .
" P r i v a t e n o n p r o f i t t a x - e x e m p t o r g a n i z a t i o n s m a y a p p l y f o r R e c r e a t i o n a l T r a i l P r o j e c t s . P r o j e c t s
m u s t b e n e f i t t h e g e n e r a l p u b l i c , a n d n o t o n l y a p r i v a t e e n t i t y .
" A n y o t h e r e n t i t y w i t h r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r o v e r s i g h t o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n o r r e c r e a t i o n a l t r a i l s t h a t t h e
C o m m i s s i o n d e t e r m i n e s t o b e e l i g i b l e .
F o r f u n d i n g a w a r d e d t o a t r i b a l g o v e r n m e n t , a f u n d t r a n s f e r t o t h e B u r e a u o f I n d i a n A f f a i r s i l e a m a y
b e n e c e s s a r y . A t r i b a l g o v e r n m e n t m a y a l s o p a r t n e r w i t h a n o t h e r e l i g i b l e e n t i t y t o a p p l y i f d e s i r e d .
* C a l t r a n s a n d M P O s , e x c e p t f o r M P O s t h a t a r e a l s o r e g i o n a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n n i n g a g e n c i e s , a r e n o t
e l i g i b l e p r o j e c t a p p l i c a n t s f o r t h e f e d e r a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A l t e r n a t i v e P r o g r a m f u n d s a p p r o p r i a t e d t o t h e
A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m . T h e r e f o r e , f u n d i n g a w a r d e d t o p r o j e c t s s u b m i t t e d d i r e c t l y b y C a l t r a n s a n d
M P O s a r e l i m i t e d t o o t h e r A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m f u n d s . C a l t r a n s a n d M P O s m a y p a r t n e r w i t h a n
e l i g i b l e e n t i t y t o e x p a n d f u n d i n g o p p o r t u n i t i e s .
P A R T N E R I N G W I T H I M P L E M E N T A T I N G A G E N C I E S
E n t i t i e s t h a t a r e u n a b l e t o a p p l y f o r A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m f u n d s o r t h a t a r e u n a b l e t o e n t e r i n t o a
M a s t e r A g r e e m e n t w i t h t h e S t a t e m u s t p a r t n e r w i t h a n e l i g i b l e a p p l i c a n t t h a t c a n i m p l e m e n t t h e p r o j e c t .
E n t i t i e s t h a t a r e u n f a m i l i a r w i t h t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s t o a d m i n i s t e r a F e d e r a l - A i d H i g h w a y P r o g r a m p r o j e c t
m a y p a r t n e r w i t h a n e l i g i b l e a p p l i c a n t t h a t c a n i m p l e m e n t t h e p r o j e c t . T h i s a r r a n g e m e n t m u s t b e
f o r m a l i z e d t h r o u g h a s i g n e d M e m o r a n d u m o f U n d e r s t a n d i n g o r I n t e r a g e n c y A g r e e m e n t b e t w e e n t h e
p r o j e c t a p p l i c a n t a n d i m p l e m e n t i n g a g e n c y .
T h e i m p l e m e n t i n g a g e n c y w i l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e a n d a c c o u n t a b l e f o r t h e u s e a n d e x p e n d i t u r e o f p r o g r a m
f u n d s .
E L I G I B L E P R O J E C T S
A l l p r o j e c t s m u s t b e s e l e c t e d t h r o u g h a c o m p e t i t i v e p r o c e s s a n d m u s t m e e t o n e o r m o r e o f t h e p r o g r a m
g o a l s . B e c a u s e t h e m a j o r i t y o f f u n d s i n t h e A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m a r e f e d e r a l f u n d s , m o s t
p r o j e c t s m u s t b e f e d e r a l - a i d e l i g i b l e :
" I n f r a s t r u c t u r e P r o j e c t s : C a p i t a l i m p r o v e m e n t s t h a t w i l l f u r t h e r t h e g o a l s o f t h i s p r o g r a m . T h i s
t y p i c a l l y i n c l u d e s t h e p l a n n i n g , d e s i g n , a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n o f f a c i l i t i e s .
" N o n - i n f r a s t r u c t u r e P r o j e c t s : E d u c a t i o n , e n c o u r a g e m e n t , e n f o r c e m e n t , a n d p l a n n i n g a c t i v i t i e s t h a t
f u r t h e r t h e g o a l s o f t h i s p r o g r a m . T h e C o m m i s s i o n i n t e n d s t o f o c u s f u n d i n g f o r n o n - i n f r a s t r u c t u r e
p r o j e c t s o n p i l o t a n d s t a r t - u p p r o j e c t s t h a t c a n d e m o n s t r a t e f u n d i n g f o r o n g o i n g e f f o r t s . T h e
A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m f u n d s a r e n o t i n t e n d e d t o f u n d o n g o i n g p r o g r a m o p e r a t i o n s . N o n -
i n f r a s t r u c t u r e p r o j e c t s a r e n o t l i m i t e d t o t h o s e b e n e f i t i n g s c h o o l s t u d e n t s .
" I n f r a s t r u c t u r e p r o j e c t s w i t h n o n - i n f r a s t r u c t u r e c o m p o n e n t s .
M I N I M U M R E Q U E S T F O R F U N D S
I n o r d e r t o m a x i m i z e t h e e f f e c t i v e n e s s o f p r o g r a m f u n d s a n d t o e n c o u r a g e t h e a g g r e g a t i o n o f s m a l l
p r o j e c t s i n t o a c o m p r e h e n s i v e b u n d l e o f p r o j e c t s , t h e m i n i m u m r e q u e s t f o r A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m
D r a f t A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m G u i d e l i n e s ( 1 / 1 7 / 1 4 ) 5
funds that will be considered is $250,000. This minimum does not apply to non -infrastructure projects,
Safe Routes to Schools projects, and Recreational Trails projects.
MPOs, in administering a competitive selection process, may use a different minimum funding size. Use
of a minimum project size greater than $500,000 must be approved by the Commission prior to the
MPO's call for projects.
EXAMPLE PROJECTS
Below is a list of projects considered generally eligible for Active Transportation Program funding. This list
is not intended to be comprehensive; other types of projects that are not on this list may also be eligible if
they further the goals of the program.
• Development of new bikeways and walkways that improve mobility, access, or safety for non -
motorized users.
• Improvements to existing bikeways and walkways, which improve mobility, access, or safety for
non -motorized users.
o Elimination of hazardous conditions on existing bikeways and walkways.
o Preventative maintenance of bikeways and walkways with the primary goal of extending
the service life of the facility.
• Installation of traffic control devices to improve the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists.
• Safe Routes to School projects that improve the safety of children walking and bicycling to
school, in accordance with Section 1404 of Public Law 109-59.
• Safe routes to transit projects, which will encourage transit by improving biking and walking
routes to mass transportation facilities and school bus stops.
• Secure bicycle parking at employment centers, park and ride lots, rail and transit stations, and
ferry docks and landings.
• Bicycle -carrying facilities on public transit, including rail and ferries.
• Establishment or expansion of a bike share program.
• Recreational trails and trailheads, park projects that facilitate trail linkages or connectivity to non -
motorized corridors, and conversion of abandoned railroad corridors to trails.
• Development of a bike, pedestrian, safe routes to schools, or active transportation plan in a
disadvantaged community.
• Education programs to increase bicycling and walking, and other non -infrastructure investments
that demonstrate effectiveness in increasing active transportation, including but not limited to:
o Development and implementation of bike -to -work or walk -to -work school day/month
programs.
o Conducting bicycle and/or pedestrian counts, walkability and/or bikability assessments or
audits, or pedestrian and/or bicycle safety analysis to inform plans and projects.
o Conducting pedestrian and bicycle safety education programs.
o Development and publishing of community walking and biking maps, including school
route/travel plans.
o Development and implementation of walking school bus or bike train programs.
o Components of open streets events directly linked to the promotion of a new
infrastructure project.
o Targeted enforcement activities around high pedestrian and/or bicycle injury and/or
fatality locations (intersections or corridors). These activities cannot be general traffic
enforcement but must be tied to improving pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 6
o School crossing guard training.
o School bicycle clinics.
o Development and implementation of programs and tools that maximize use of available
and emerging technologies to implement the goals of the Active Transportation Program.
PROJECT TYPE REQUIREMENTS
As discussed in the Funding Distribution section (above), State and Federal law segregate the Active
Transportation Program into multiple, overlapping components. Below is an explanation of the
requirements specific to these components.
DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES
For a project to contribute toward the Disadvantaged Communities funding requirement, the project must
clearly demonstrate a benefit to a community that meets any of the following criteria:
• The median household income is less than 80% of the statewide average median based on the
most current census tract level data from the American Community Survey. Data is available at
http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml
• An area identified as among the most disadvantaged 10% in the state according to latest versions
of the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen) scores.
Scores are available at http://oehha.ca.gov/ej/ces11.html.
• At least 75% of public school students in the project area are eligible to receive free or reduced -
price meals under the National School Lunch Program. Data is available at
http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/sd/filessp.asp. Applicants using this measure must indicate how the
project benefits the school students in the project area or, for projects not directly benefiting
school students, explain why this measure is representative of the larger community.
If a project applicant believes a project benefits a disadvantaged community but the project does not meet
the aforementioned criteria, the applicant must submit for consideration a quantitative assessment of why
the community should be considered disadvantaged.
MPOs, in administering a competitive selection process, may use different criteria for determining which
projects benefit Disadvantaged Communities if the criteria are approved by the Commission prior to the
MPO's call for projects.
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECTS
For a project to contribute toward the Safe Routes to School funding requirement, the project must
directly increase safety and convenience for public school students to walk and/or bike to school. Safe
Routes to Schools infrastructure projects must be located within two miles of a public school or within the
vicinity of a public school bus stop. Other than traffic education and enforcement activities, non -
infrastructure projects do not have a location restriction.
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 7
RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROJECTS
For trail projects that are primarily recreational to be eligible for Active Transportation Program funding,
the projects must meet the federal requirements of the Recreational Trails Program as such projects may
not be eligible for funding from other sources (http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/recreational_trails/).
Multi -purpose trails and paths that serve both recreational and transportation purposes are generally
eligible in the ATP, so long as they are consistent with one or more goals of the program.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE RESOURCE CENTER
In 2009, the University of California, San Francisco was awarded federal Safe Routes to School funds to
act as the Technical Assistance Resource Center for the purpose of building and supporting local regional
Safe Routes School non -infrastructure projects.
Typical center roles have included:
• Providing technical assistance and training to help agencies deliver existing and future projects
and to strengthen community involvement in future projects including those in disadvantaged
communities.
• Developing and providing educational materials to local communities by developing a community
awareness kit, creating an enhanced Safe Routes to Schools website, and providing other
educational tools and resources.
• Participating in and assisting with the Safe Routes to Schools Advisory Committee.
• Assisting with program evaluation.
The Commission intends to comply with the statutory requirement to fund a state technical assistance
center by expanding the existing Safe Routes to Schools Technical Assistance Resource Center
interagency agreement to serve all Active Transportation Program non -infrastructure projects.
PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS
PROJECT APPLICATION
Active Transportation Program project applications will be available at
www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/atp/index.html.
A project application must include the signature of the Chief Executive Officer or other officer authorized
by the applicant's governing board. Where the project is to be implemented by an agency other than the
applicant, documentation of the agreement between the project applicant and implementing agency must
be submitted with the project application. A project application must also include documentation of all
other funds committed to the projects.
Project applications should be addressed or delivered to:
Caltrans
Division of Local Assistance, MS-1
Attention: April Nitsos
P.O. Box 942874
Sacramento, CA 95814
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 8
Except for applications submitted through an optional MPO supplemental call for project, the Commission
will consider only projects for which five hard copies and one electronic copy (via cd or portable hard
drive) of a complete application are received by May 21, 2014. By the same date, an additional copy must
also be sent to the Regional Transportation Planning Agency or County Transportation Commission
within which the project is located and to the MPO (a contact list can be found at
wwvv.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/offices/orip/).
SEQUENTIAL PROJECT SELECTION
All project applications, except for applications submitted through an optional MPO supplemental call for
projects, must be submitted to Ca!trans for consideration in the statewide competition. The Commission
will consider approval of a competitive grant only when it finds that the grant request meets the
requirements of statute and that the project has a commitment of any supplementary funding needed for
a full funding plan.
Projects not selected for programming in the statewide competition must be considered in the large MPO
run competitions or the state run Small Urban or Rural competitions.
A large urban MPO may elect to have a supplemental MPO specific call for projects. The projects
received in this call must be considered along with those not selected through the statewide competition.
MPO COMPETITIVE PROJECT SELECTION
As stated above, projects not selected for programming in the statewide competition must be considered
by the MPOs in administering a competitive selection process.
An MPO choosing to use the same project selection criteria and weighting, minimum project size, match
requirement, and definition of disadvantage communities as used by the Commission for the statewide
competition may defer its project selection to the Commission. An MPO deferring its project select to the
Commission may not conduct a supplemental call for projects.
An MPO, with Commission approval, may use a different project selection criteria or weighting, minimum
project size, match requirement, or definition of disadvantage communities for its competitive selection
process. Use of a minimum project size of $500,000 or less, or of a larger different match requirement
than in the statewide competitive program does not require prior Commission approval. An MPO may also
elect to have a supplemental MPO specific call for projects. The projects received in this call must be
considered along with those not selected through the statewide competition.
In administering a competitive selection process, a MPO must use a multidisciplinary advisory group to
assist in evaluating project applications. Following its competitive selection process, a MPO must submit
its programming recommendations to the Commission along with a list of the members of its
multidisciplinary advisory group. If the MPO submitted a project application and that project is
recommended for programming, the MPO must explain how its evaluation process resulted in an
unbiased evaluation of projects.
SCREENING CRITERIA
Demonstrated needs of the applicant: A project that is already fully funded will not be considered for
funding in the Active Transportation Program. The Commission will make an exception to this policy by
allowing the supplanting of federal funds on a project for the 2014 Active Transportation Program.
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 9
Consistency with a regional transportation plan: All projects submitted must be consistent with the
relevant adopted regional transportation plan that has been developed and updated pursuant to
Government Code Section 65080.
SCORING CRITERIA
Proposed projects will be rated and ranked on the basis of applicant responses to the below criteria.
Project programming recommendations may not be based strictly on the rating criteria given the various
components of the Active Transportation Program and requirements of the various fund sources.
• Potential for increased walking and bicycling, especially among students, including the
identification of walking and bicycling routes to and from schools, transit facilities, community
centers, employment centers, and other destinations; and including increasing and improving
connectivity and mobility of non -motorized users. (0 to 30 points)
• Potential for reducing the number and/or rate of pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities and injuries,
including the identification of safety hazards for pedestrians and bicyclists. (0 to 25 points)
• Public participation and Planning. (0 to 15 points)
Identification of the community -based public participation process that culminated in the project
proposal, which may include noticed meetings and consultation with local stakeholders. Project
applicants must clearly articulate how the local participation process resulted in the identification
and prioritization of the proposed project.
For projects costing $1 million or more, an emphasis will be placed on projects that are prioritized
in an adopted city or county bicycle transportation plan, pursuant to Section 891.2, pedestrian
plan, safe routes to school plan, active transportation plan, trail plan, or circulation element of a
general plan that incorporated elements of an active transportation plan. In future funding cycles,
the Commission expects to make consistency with an approved active transportation plan a
requirement for large projects.
• Cost-effectiveness, defined as maximizing the impact of the funds provided. (0 to 10 points)
Applicants must discuss the relative costs and benefits of the range of alternatives considered
and quantify the safety and mobility benefit in relationship to total project cost.
Ca[trans must develop a benefit/cost model for infrastructure and non -infrastructure active
transportation projects in order to improve information available to decision makers at the state
and MPO level in future programming cycles.
• Improved public health through the targeting of populations with high risk factors for obesity,
physical inactivity, asthma or other health issues. (0 to 10 points)
• Benefit to disadvantaged communities. (0 to 10 points)
• Use of the California Conservation Corps or a qualified community conservation corps, as defined
in Section 14507.5 of the Public Resources Code, as partners to undertake or construct
applicable projects in accordance with Section 1524 of Public Law 112-141. Points will be
deducted if an applicant does not seek corps participation or if an applicant intends not to utilize a
corps in a project in which the corps can participate. (0 to -5 points)
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 10
The California Conservation Corps can be contacted at ccc.ca.gov. Community conservation
corps can be contacted at californialocalconservationcorps.org.
Direct contracting with the California Conservation Corps or a qualified community conservation
corps without bidding is permissible provided that the implementing agency demonstrates cost
effectiveness per 23 CFR 635.204 and obtains approval from Caltrans. A copy of the agreement
between the implementing agency and the proposed conservation corps must be included in the
project application as supporting documentation.
• Applicant's performance on past grants. This may include project delivery, project benefits
(anticipated v. actual), and use of the California Conservation Corps or qualified community
conservation corps (planned v. actual). Applications from agencies with documented poor
performance records on past grants may be excluded from competing or may be penalized in
scoring. (0 to -10 points)
PROJECT EVALUATION COMMITTEE
Commission staff will form a multidisciplinary Project Evaluation Committee to assist in evaluating project
applications. In forming the Project Evaluation Committee, staff will seek participants with expertise in
bicycling and pedestrian transportation, including Safe Routes to Schools type projects, and in projects
benefiting disadvantaged communities, and will seek geographically balanced representation from state
agencies, large MPOs, regional transportation planning agencies, local jurisdictions in small urban and
rural areas, and non -governmental organizations. Priority for participation in the evaluation committee will
be given to those who do not represent a project applicant, or will not benefit from projects submitted by
others.
In reviewing and selecting projects to be funded with federal Recreational Trails program funds, the
Commission staff will collaborate with the Department of Parks and Recreation to evaluate proposed
projects.
MPOs, in administering a competitive selection process, must use a multidisciplinary advisory group,
similar to the aforementioned Project Evaluation Committee, to assist in evaluating project applications.
PROGRAMMING
PROJECT PROGRAMMING
Following at least one public hearing, the Commission will adopt a program of projects for the Active
Transportation Program, by April 1 of each odd numbered year. The Active Transportation Program must
be developed consistent with the fund estimate and the amount programmed in each fiscal year must not
exceed the amount identified in the fund estimate.
The program of projects for each fiscal year will include, for each project, the amount to be funded from
the Active Transportation Program, and the estimated total cost of the project. Project costs in the Active
Transportation Program will include all project support costs and all project listings will specify costs for
each of the following components: (1) completion of all permits and environmental studies; (2)
preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates; (3) right-of-way capital outlay (4) support for right-of-
way acquisition; (5) construction capital outlay; and (6) construction management and engineering,
including surveys and inspection. The cost of each project component will be listed in the Active
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 11
Transportation Program no earlier than in the fiscal year in which the particular project component can be
implemented.
When proposing to fund only preconstruction components for a project, the applicant must demonstrate
the means by which it intends to fund the construction of a useable segment, consistent with the regional
transportation plan or the Caltrans interregional transportation strategic plan.
When project design, right-of-way or construction are programmed before the implementing agency
completes the environmental process, updated cost estimates, updated analysis of the project's cost
effectiveness, and updated analysis of the project's ability to further the goals of the program must be
submitted to the Commission following completion of the environmental process. If this updated
information indicates that a project is expected to accomplish fewer benefits or is less cost effective as
compared with the initial project application, future funding for the project may be deleted from the
program. For the MPO selected competitions, this information must be submitted to the MPO. It is the
responsibility of the MPO to recommend that the project be deleted from the program if warranted.
The Commission will program and allocate funding to projects in whole thousands of dollars and will
include a project only if it is fully funded from a combination of Active Transportation Program and other
committed funding. The Commission will regard funds as committed when they are programmed by the
Commission or when the agency with discretionary authority over the funds has made its commitment to
the project by ordinance or resolution. For federal formula funds, including Surface Transportation
Program, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program, and federal formula transit funds,
the commitment may be by Federal approval of the Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement
Program. For federal discretionary funds, the commitment may be by federal approval of a full funding
grant agreement or by grant approval.
If the program of projects adopted by the Commission does not program the full capacity identified in the
fund estimate for a given fiscal year, the balance will remain available to advance programmed projects.
Subject to the availability of federal funds, a balance not programmed in one fiscal year will carry over
and be available for projects in the following fiscal year.
over into a subsequent fund estimate.
The intent of the Commission is to consolidate the allocation of federal funds to as few projects as
practicable. Therefore, the smallest project may be designated, at the time of programming, for state -only
funding.
The Commission will consider the allocation of funds for a project when it receives an allocation request
and recommendation from Caltrans in the same manner as for the STIP (see section 64 of the STIP
guidelines). The recommendation will include a determination of project readiness, the availability of
appropriated funding, and the availability of all identified and committed supplementary funding.
Where the project is to be implemented by an agency other than the applicant, the allocation request
must include a copy of the Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement between the
project applicant and implementing agency.
The Commission will approve the allocation if the funds are available and the allocation is necessary to
implement the project as included in the adopted Active Transportation Program.
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 12
In order to ensure the timely use of all program funds, the Commission will, in the last quarter of the fiscal
year, allocate funds to projects programmed in a future fiscal year on a first -come, first served basis. If
there are insufficient funds, the Commission may delay the allocation of funds to a project until the next
fiscal year without requiring an extension. Should requests for allocations exceed available capacity, the
Commission will give priority to projects programmed in the current -year.
Allocation requests for a project in the MPO selected portion of the program must include a
recommendation by the MPO.
In compliance with Section 21150 of the Public Resources Code, the Commission will not allocate funds
for design, right-of-way, or construction prior to documentation of environmental clearance under the
California Environmental Quality Act. As a matter of policy, the Commission will not allocate funds for
design, right-of-way, or construction of a federally funded project prior to documentation of environmental
clearance under the National Environmental Policy Act. Exceptions to this policy may be made in
instances where federal law allows for the acquisition of right-of-way prior to completion of National
Environmental Policy Act review.
If an implementing agency requests an allocation of funds in an amount that is less than the amount
programmed, the balance of the programmed amount may be allocated to a programmed project
advanced from a future fiscal year. An MPO, in administering its competitive portion of the Active
Transportation Program, must determine which projects to advance and make that recommendation to
the Commission. Unallocated funds in one fiscal year will carry over and be available for projects in the
following fiscal year.
PROJECT DELIVERY
Active Transportation Program allocations must be requested in the fiscal year of project programming,
and are valid for award for six months from the date of allocation unless the Commission approves an
extension. Applicants may submit and the Commission will evaluate extension requests in the same
manner as for STIP projects (see section 66 of the STIP guidelines) except that extension to the period
for project allocation and for project award will be limited to twelve months. Extension requests for a
project in the MPO selected portion of the program must include a recommendation by the MPO,
consistent with the preceding requirements.
If there are insufficient funds, the Commission may delay the allocation of funds to a project until the next
fiscal year without requiring an extension.
Whenever programmed funds are not allocated within the fiscal year they programmed or within the time
allowed by an approved extension, the project will be deleted from the Active Transportation Program.
Funds available following the deletion of a project may be allocated to a programmed project advanced
from a future fiscal year. An MPO, in administering its competitive portion of the Active Transportation
Program, must determine which projects to advance and make that recommendation to the Commission.
Unallocated funds in one fiscal year will carry over and be available for projects in the following fiscal
year.
The implementing agency must enter into a cooperative agreement with Caltrans and, if the project is
federally funded, obligate the federal funds within six months.
Funds allocated for project development or right of way costs must be expended by the end of the second
fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the funds were allocated. After the award of a contract, the
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 13
implementing agency has up to 36 months to complete (accept) the contract. At the time of fund
allocation, the Commission may extend the deadline for completion of work and the liquidation of funds if
necessary to accommodate the proposed expenditure plan for the project. The implementing agency has
six months after contract acceptance to make the final payment to the contractor or vendor, prepare the
final Report of Expenditure and submit the final invoice to Caltrans for reimbursement.
It is incumbent upon the implementing agency to develop accurate project cost estimates. If the amount
of a contract award is less than the amount allocated, or if the final cost of a component is less than the
amount awarded, the savings generated will not be available for future programming.
Caltrans will track the delivery of Active Transportation Program projects and submit to the Commission a
semiannual report showing the delivery of each project phase.
PROJECT INACTIVITY
Once funds for a project are encumbered, project applicants are expected to invoice on a regular basis
(for federal funds, see 23 CFR 630.106 and the Caltrans' Inactive Obligation Policy). Failure to do so will
result in the project being deemed "inactive" and subject to deobligation if proper justification is not
provided.
PROJECT REPORTING
As a condition of the project allocation, the Commission will require the implementing agency to submit
semi-annual reports on the activities and progress made toward implementation of the project and a final
delivery report. An agency implementing a project in the MPO selected portion of the program must also
submit copies of its semi-annual reports and of its final delivery report to the MPO. The purpose of the
reports is to ensure that the project is executed in a timely fashion and is within the scope and budget
identified when the decision was made to fund the project.
Within one year of the project becoming operable, the implementing agency must provide a final delivery
report to the Commission which includes:
• The scope of the completed project as compared to the programmed project.
• Before and after photos documenting the project.
• The final costs as compared to the approved project budget.
• Its duration as compared to the project schedule in the project application.
• Performance outcomes derived from the project as compared to those described in the project
application. This should include before and after pedestrian and/or bicycle counts, and an
explanation of the methodology for conduction counts.
• Actual use of the California Conservation Corps or qualified community conservation corps as
compared to the use in the project application.
Please note that the final delivery report required by this section is in addition to the aforementioned final
Report of Expenditures.
For the purpose of this section, a project becomes operable when the construction contract is accepted or
acquired equipment is received, or in the case of non -infrastructure activities, when the activities are
complete.
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 14
Caltrans must audit a sample of Active Transportation Program projects to evaluate the performance of
the project, determine whether project costs incurred and reimbursed are in compliance with the executed
project agreement or approved amendments thereof; state and federal laws and regulations; contract
provisions; and Commission guidelines, and whether project deliverables (outputs) and outcomes are
consistent with the project scope, schedule and benefits described in the executed project agreement or
approved amendments thereof. A report on the projects audited must be submitted to the Commission
annually.
DOLES AND RESPO
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (COMMISSION)
The Commission responsibilities include:
• Adopt guidelines and policies for the Active Transportation Program.
• Adopt Active Transportation Program Fund Estimate.
• Evaluate projects, including the forming of the Project Evaluation Committee.
• Adopt a program of projects, including:
o The statewide portion of the Active Transportation Program,
o The rural portion of the Active Transportation Program,
o The small urban portion of the Active Transportation Program, and
o The MPO selected portion of the program based on the recommendations of the MPOs.
o Ensure that at least 25% of the funds benefit disadvantage communities.
• Allocate funds to projects.
• Evaluate and report to the legislature.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS)
Caltrans has the primary responsibility for the administration of the Active Transportation Program.
Responsibilities include:
• Provide statewide program and procedural guidance (i.e. provide project evaluation of materials
and instructions), conducts outreach through various networks such as, but not limited to, the
Active Transportation Program website, and at conferences, meetings, or workgroups.
• Provide program training.
• Solicit project applications for the program.
• Facilitate the Project Evaluation Committee.
• Perform eligibility reviews of Active Transportation Program projects.
• Review project applications for scope, cost, schedule, and completeness. Evaluate, score, and
rank applications.
• Recommend projects to the Commission for programming and allocation.
• Notify applicants of the results after each call for projects.
• Track and report on project implementation.
• Audit a selection of projects
• Serve as the main point of contact in project implementation,
resource center, after notifying successful applicants of award.
including the technical assistance
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 15
METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS (MPOS) WITH LARGE
URBANIZED AREAS
MPOs with large urbanized areas are responsible for overseeing a competitive project selection process
in accordance with these guidelines. The responsibilities include:
• Ensure that at least 25% of the funds in each MPO must benefit disadvantage communities.
• If using different project selection criteria or weighting, minimum project size, match requirement,
or definition of disadvantage communities for its competitive selection process, the MPO must
obtain Commission approval prior to the MPO's call for projects. Use of a minimum project size of
$500,000 or less, or of a larger different match requirement than in the statewide competitive
program does not require prior Commission approval.
• If electing to have a supplemental MPO specific call for projects, the projects within the MPO
boundaries that were not selected through the statewide competition must be considered along
with those received in the supplemental call for projects.
• In administering a competitive selection process, a MPO must use a multidisciplinary advisory
group to assist in evaluating project applications.
• In administering a competitive selection process, a MPO must explain how the projects
recommended for programming by the MPO include a broad spectrum of projects to benefit
pedestrians and bicyclists. The explanation must include a discussion of how the recommended
projects benefit students walking and cycling to school.
• An MPO choosing to use the same project selection criteria and weighting, minimum project size,
match requirement, and definition of disadvantage communities as used by the Commission for
the statewide competition may defer its project selection to the Commission. An MPO deferring its
project select to the Commission must notify the Commission my May 21, 2014, and may not
conduct a supplemental call for projects.
• Approve amendments to the MPO selected portion of the program prior to Commission approval.
• Recommend allocation requests for a project in the MPO selected portion of the program.
• Determine which projects to advance and make that recommendation to the Commission.
• Submit an annual assessment of its portion of the program it terms of its effectiveness in
achieving the goals of the Active Transportation Program.
In addition, the following statutory requirements apply specifically to the Southern California Association
of Governments (SCAG):
• SCAG must consult with county transportation commissions, the Commission, and Caltrans in the
development of competitive project selection criteria. The criteria should include consideration of
geographic equity, consistent with program objectives.
• SCAG must place priority on projects that are consistent with plans adopted by local and regional
governments within the county where the project is located.
• SCAG must obtain concurrence from the county transportation commissions.
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCIES (RTPAS) OUTSIDE AN
MPO WITH LARGE URBANIZED AREAS AND AN MPO WITHOUT LARGE
URBANIZED AREAS
These Regional Transportation Planning Agencies and MPOs may make recommendations or provide
input to the Commission regarding the projects within their boundaries that are applying for Active
Transportation Program funding.
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 16
PROJECT APPLICANT
Project applicants nominate Active Transportation Program projects for funding consideration. If awarded
Active Transportation Program funding for a submitted project, the project applicant (or partnering
implementing agency if applicable) has contractual responsibility for carrying out the project to completion
and complying with reporting requirements in accordance with federal, state, and local laws and
regulations, and these guidelines.
For capital projects off the state highway system, the project applicant will be responsible for the ongoing
operations and maintenance of the facility. If another entity agrees to assume responsibility for the
ongoing operations and maintenance of the facility, documentation of the agreement must be submitted
with the project application, and a copy of the Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement
between the parties must be submitted with the request for allocation.
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
A city, county, county transportation commission, regional transportation planning agency, MPO, school
district, or transit district may prepare an active transportation plan. An active transportation plan prepared
by a city or county may be integrated into the circulation element of its general plan or a separate plan.
An active transportation plan must include, but not be limited to, the following components or explain why
the component is not applicable:
a) The estimated number of existing bicycle trips and pedestrian trips in the plan area, both in
absolute numbers and as a percentage of all trips, and the estimated increase in the number of
bicycle trips and pedestrian trips resulting from implementation of the plan.
b) The number and location of collisions, serious injuries, and fatalities suffered by bicyclists and
pedestrians in the plan area, both in absolute numbers and as a percentage of all collisions and
injuries, and a goal for collision, serious injury, and fatality reduction after implementation of the
plan.
c) A map and description of existing and proposed land use and settlement patterns which must
include, but not be limited to, locations of residential neighborhoods, schools, shopping centers,
public buildings, major employment centers, and other destinations.
d) A map and description of existing and proposed bicycle transportation facilities.
e) A map and description of existing and proposed end -of -trip bicycle parking facilities.
f) A description of existing and proposed policies related to bicycle parking in public locations,
private parking garages and parking lots and in new commercial and residential developments.
g) A map and description of existing and proposed bicycle transport and parking facilities for
connections with and use of other transportation modes. These must include, but not be limited
to, parking facilities at transit stops, rail and transit terminals, ferry docks and landings, park and
ride lots, and provisions for transporting bicyclists and bicycles on transit or rail vehicles or ferry
vessels.
h) A map and description of existing and proposed pedestrian facilities at major transit hubs. These
must include, but are not limited to, rail and transit terminals, and ferry docks and landings.
i) A description of proposed signage providing wayfinding along bicycle and pedestrian networks to
designated destinations.
j) A description of the policies and procedures for maintaining existing and proposed bicycle and
pedestrian facilities, including, but not limited to, the maintenance of smooth pavement, freedom
from encroaching vegetation, maintenance of traffic control devices including striping and other
pavement markings, and lighting.
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 17
k) A description of bicycle and pedestrian safety, education, and encouragement programs
conducted in the area included within the plan, efforts by the law enforcement agency having
primary traffic law enforcement responsibility in the area to enforce provisions of the law
impacting bicycle and pedestrian safety, and the resulting effect on accidents involving bicyclists
and pedestrians.
I) A description of the extent of community involvement in development of the plan, including
disadvantaged and underserved communities.
m) A description of how the active transportation plan has been coordinated with neighboring
jurisdictions and is consistent with other local or regional transportation, air quality, or energy
conservation plans, including, but not limited to, general plans and a Sustainable Community
Strategy in a Regional Transportation Plan.
n) A description of the projects and programs proposed in the plan and a listing of their priorities for
implementation, including the methodology for project prioritization and a proposed timeline for
implementation.
o) A description of past expenditures for bicycle and pedestrian facilities and programs, and future
financial needs for projects and programs that improve safety and convenience for bicyclists and
pedestrians in the plan area. Include anticipated revenue sources and potential grant funding for
bicycle and pedestrian uses.
p) A description of steps necessary to implement the plan and the reporting process that will be
used to keep the adopting agency and community informed of the progress being made in
implementing the plan.
q) A resolution showing adoption of the plan by the city, county or district. If the active transportation
plan was prepared by a county transportation commission, regional transportation planning
agency, MPO, school district or transit district, the plan should indicate the support via resolution
of the city(s) or county(s) in which the proposed facilities would be located.
A city, county, school district, or transit district that has prepared an active transportation plan may submit
the plan to the county transportation commission or transportation planning agency for approval. The city,
county, school district, or transit district may submit an approved plan to Caltrans in connection with an
application for funds active transportation facilities which will implement the plan.
Additional information related to active transportation plans can be found in the sections on Funding for
Active Transportation Plans and Scoring Criteria.
LEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
Unless programmed for state -only funding, project applicants must comply with the provisions of Title 23
of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations and with the processes and procedures contained in the
Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual and the Master Agreement with Caltrans. Below are
examples of federal requirements that must be met when administering Active Transportation Program
projects.
• National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance and documentation is required on all
projects. Refer to Chapter 6, Environmental Procedures, of the Local Assistance Procedures
Manual for guidance and procedures on complying with NEPA and other federal environmentally
related laws.
• Project applicants may not proceed with the final design of a project or request "Authorization to
proceed with Right -of -Way" or "Authorization to proceed with Construction" until Caltrans has
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 18
signed a Categorical Exclusion, a Finding of No Significant Impact, or a Record of Decision.
Failure to follow this requirement will make the project ineligible for federal reimbursement.
• If the project requires the purchase of right of way (the acquisition of real property), the provisions
of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 apply.
For more information, refer to Chapter 13, Right of Way, of the Local Assistance Procedures
Manual.
• If the project applicant requires the consultation services of architects, landscape architects, land
surveyors, or engineers, the procedures in the Chapter 10, Consultant Selection, of the Local
Assistance Procedures Manual must be followed.
• Contract documents are required to incorporate applicable federal requirements such as Davis
Bacon wage rates, competitive bidding, Disadvantaged Business Enterprises/Equal Employment
Opportunity provisions, etc. For more information, refer to Chapter 9, Civil Rights and
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises, and Chapter 12, Plans, Specifications & Estimate, of the
Local Assistance Procedures Manual
Failure to comply with federal requirements may result in the repayment to the State of Active
Transportation Program funds.
DESIGN STAND
Streets and Highways Code Section 891 requires that all city, county, regional, and other local agencies
responsible for the development or operation of bikeways or roadways where bicycle travel is permitted
utilize all minimum safety design criteria established by Caltrans. Chapter 11, Design Standards, of the
Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual describes statewide design standards, specifications,
procedures, guides, and references that are acceptable in the geometric, drainage, and structural design
of Local Assistance projects. The chapter also describes design exception approval procedures, including
the delegation of design exception approval authority to the City and County Public Works Directors for
projects not on the state highway system. These standards and procedures, including the exception
approval process, must be used for all Active Transportation Program projects cxccpt rccrcation trail:,
projectJ.
For capital projects off the state highway system, the project applicant will be responsible for the ongoing
operations and maintenance of the facility. If another entity agrees to assume responsibility for the
ongoing operations and maintenance of the facility, documentation of the agreement must be submitted
with the project application, and a copy of the Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement
between the parties must be submitted with the request for allocation.
All facilities constructed using Active Transportation Program funds cannot revert to a non -Active
Transportation Program use for a minimum of 20 years or its actual useful life as documented in the
project application, whichever is less, without approval of the Commission.
The Active Transportation Program will be evaluated for its effectiveness in increasing the use of active
modes of transportation in California. Applicants that receive funding for a project must collect and submit
data to Caltrans as described in the "Project Reporting" section.
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 19
By December 31, 2014, the Commission will post on its website information about the initial program of
projects, including a list of all projects programmed and allocated in each portion of the program, by
region, and by project type, along with information on grants awarded to disadvantaged communities,
After 2014, the Commission will include in its annual report to the Legislature a discussion on the
effectiveness of the program in terms of planned and achieved improvement in mobility and safety and
timely use of funds, and will include a summary of its activities relative to the administration of the Active
Transportation Program including:
• Projects programmed,
• Projects allocated,
• Projects completed to date by project type,
• Projects completed to date by geographic distribution,
• Projects completed to date by benefit to disadvantaged communities, and
• Projects completed to date with the California Conservation Corps or qualified community
conservation corps.
Draft Active Transportation Program Guidelines (1/17/14) 20
AGENDA ITEM 11
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 11.
AGENDA ITEM 12
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 27, 2014
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager
SUBJECT:
Measure A Local Streets and Roads — FY 2013/14 Mid -Year Revenue
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
On January 8, 2014, Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer presented to the Commission
the mid -year FY 2013/14 revenue projections for Measure A, as well as the FY 2014/15
projections. The projected revenues for FY 2013/14 increased from $147 M to $157 M. The
attached FY 2013/14 Revised Measure A Allocation Projections reflects the Measure A Local
Streets and Roads allocations to the cities and the County of Riverside. The upcoming
FY 2014/15 projections increased by $10 M from the revised mid -year FY 2013/14
projections.
Next month you will be receiving the annual Measure A Local Streets and Roads revenue
projections, maintenance of effort certification, and Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan
notification for FYs 2014/15 through 2018/19. Your cooperation in making the established
deadlines for approvals is appreciated.
Attachments: Measure A FY 2013/14 Revised Projections
Measure A FY 2014/15 Projections
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A PROGRAM ALLOCATION (PROJECTION)
FY 2013/14
(Revised (1/8/14)
ORIGINAL Increase
REVISED (01.08.14) (01.09.13) (Decrease)
Revenues $ 157,000,000 $ 147,000,000 $ 10,000,000
Less: Administration 2,800,000 2,800,000 -
APPORTIONMENT TO PROGRAMS $ 154,200,000 $ 144,200,000 $ 10,000,000
Western County
Highway Improvements $ 35,189,000 $ 32,907,000 $ 2,282,000
New Corridors
Public Transit
Commuter Rail 7,038,000
Intercity Bus 1,759,000
Specialized Transit -Operations 2,199,000
Specialized Transit-CTSA 733,000
Commuter Services 1,725,000
Regional Arterial 10,350,000
Local Streets & Roads 33,465,000
BANNING $ 502,000
BEAUMONT
CALIMESA 142,000
CANYON LAKE 158,000
CORONA 3,507,000
EASTVALE 944,000
HEMET 1,521,000
JURUPA VALLEY 1,590,000
LAKE ELSINORE 1,062,000
MENIFEE 1,348,000
MORENO VALLEY 3,354,000
MURRI ETA 1,963,000
NORCO 570,000
PERRIS 1,277,000
RIVERSIDE 6,328,000
SAN JACINTO 731,000
TEMECULA 2,598,000
W I LDO MAR 521,000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY 4,644,000
RCTC Regional Arterial 705,000
Bond Financing 9,315,000
Economic Development Projects 1,380,000
SUBTOTAL -Western County 115,918,000
Coachella Valley
Highways & Regional Arterials
Local Street & Roads
CATHEDRAL CITY
COACHELLA
DESERT HOT SPRINGS
INDIAN WELLS
INDIO
LA QUINTA
PALM DESERT
PALM SPRINGS
RANCHO MIRAGE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
CVAG
Specialized & Public Transit
SUBTOTAL -Coachella Valley
Palo Verde Valley
Local Street & Roads
BLYTHE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
SUBTOTAL -Palo Verde Valley
1,362,000
618,000
467,000
248,000
1,620,000
1,484,000
2,650,000
1,983,000
870,000
1,715,000
18,597,000
13,017,000
5,579,000
12,765,000 11,937,000 828,000
6,581,000
1,645,000
2,057,000
686,000
1,613,000
9,679,000
31,294,000
457,000
114,000
142,000
47,000
112,000
671,000
2,171,000
470,000
132,000
148,000
3,279,000
882,000
1,422,000
1,487,000
993,000
1,261,000
3,136,000
1,836,000
533,000
1,194,000
5,918,000
684,000
2,429,000
487,000
4,344,000
659,000
32,000
10,000
10,000
228,000
62,000
99,000
103,000
69,000
87,000
218,000
127,000
37,000
83,000
410,000
47,000
169,000
34,000
300,000
46,000
8,711,000
1,291,000
604,000
89,000
108,401,000 7,517,000
17, 391, 000 1,206,000
12,173,000 844,000
1,274,000
578,000
437,000
231,000
1,515,000
1,387,000
2,478,000
1,854,000
814,000
1,605,000
88,000
40,000
30,000
17,000
105,000
97,000
172,000
129,000
56,000
110,000
5,217,000 362,000
37,193,000
34,781,000 2,412,000
1,089,000 1,018,000 71,000
866,000 56,000
223,000 15,000
1,089,000 1,018,000 71,000
810,000
208,000
TOTAL $
154,200,000 $ 144,200,000 $ 10,000,000
Note: Estimate for Planning Purposes, subject to change and rounding differences.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A PROGRAM ALLOCATION (PROJECTION)
FY 2014/15
Revenues $ 167,000,000
Less: Administration 2,900,000
APPORTIONMENT TO PROGRAMS $ 164,100,000
Western County
Highway Improvements $ 37,613,000
New Corridors 13,644,000
Public Transit
Commuter Rail 7,523,000
Intercity Bus 1,881,000
Specialized Transit -Operations 2,351,000
Specialized Transit-CTSA 783,000
Commuter Services 1,844,000
Regional Arterial 11,063,000
Local Streets & Roads 35,769,000
BANNING $ 530,000
BEAUMONT
CALIMESA 149,000
CANYON LAKE 169,000
CORONA 3,707,000
EASTVALE 1,088,000
HEMET 1,611,000
JURUPA VALLEY 1,802,000
LAKE ELSINORE 1,137,000
MENIFEE 1,438,000
MORENO VALLEY 3,586,000
MURRIETA 2,065,000
NORCO 599,000
PERRI S 1,353,000
RIVERSIDE 6,655,000
SAN JACINTO 718,000
TEMECULA 2,744,000
W I LDOMAR 555,000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY 5,112,000
RCTC Regional Arterial 751,000
Bond Financing 9,956,000
Economic Development Projects 1,475,000
SUBTOTAL -Western County 123,902,000
Coachella Valley
Highways & Regional Arterials
Local Street & Roads
CATHEDRAL CITY
COACHELLA
DESERT HOT SPRINGS
INDIAN WELLS
INDIO
LA QUINTA
PALM DESERT
PALM SPRINGS
RANCHO MIRAGE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
CVAG
Specialized & Public Transit
SUBTOTAL -Coachella Valley
1,401,000
629,000
494,000
244,000
1,716,000
1,509,000
2,718,000
2,048,000
876,000
2,007,000
Palo Verde Valley
Local Street & Roads
BLYTHE $ 973,000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY 249,000
SUBTOTAL -Palo Verde Valley
TOTAL
19,488,000
13,642,000
5,846,000
38,976,000
1,222,000
1,222,000
$ 164,100,000
Note: Estimate for Planning Purposes, subject to change and rounding differences.
AGENDA ITEM 13
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 13.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION REVIEW COMMITTEE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION/CTC PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM
A Funding Opportunity to Accelerate Traffic Flow Improvements in the
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Work Plan (Draft)
January 23, 2014
1. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION'S ROLE AS THE
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
State of California (State) law created the Riverside County Transportation
Commission (RCTC) in 1976 to oversee the funding and coordination of all public
transportation services within Riverside County. RCTC's mission is to assume a
leadership role in improving mobility in the County. As the Regional Transportation
Planning Agency (RTPA), RCTC is responsible for setting policies, establishing
priorities and coordinating activities among the County's various transit operators
and other agencies. RCTC also programs and/or reviews the allocation of federal,
state and local funds for highway, transit, rail and non-motorized travel (bicycle and
pedestrian), and other transportation activities.
2. BACKGROUND
As part of the FY 2012/13 and FY 2014/15 Work Program, the Mobile Source Air
Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) allocated $5.0 million to accelerate
the implementation of traffic signal coordination, synchronization, ramp metering,
and technology enhancement projects that will improve traffic flow on arterial
roadways in the South Coast region. MSRC is allocating $1.25 million to each of the
County Transportation Commissions (CTCs): the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority, Orange County Transportation Authority, San Bernardino
Associated Governments and RCTC.
RCTC has a history of distributing funds among three geographic areas in the
County: Western Riverside, Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley. For
consistency with previous allocation of STIP funds, RCTC recommends the
allocation of $1.25 million in MSRC funding as follows:
• $939,625 -(75.17%) -Western Riverside; and
• $310,375 (24.83%) -Coachella Valley
As outlined in MSRC's Invitation to Negotiate, the following traffic signal
coordination and synchronization project categories are eligible under the Traffic
Signal Program:
• Arterial Corridor Traffic Signal Coordination within a Single Jurisdiction;
• Multi-Jurisdictional Traffic Signal Coordination, including Regional Programs;
• Coordination of Adjacent Intersection Traffic Signals with Caltrans' Freeway
Onramp Metering (adaptive onramp metering); and
• Expansion and Limited Upgrades to Existing Traffic Management/Operations
Centers.
In addition, other project categories are potentially eligible if shown to offer
meaningful air quality benefits. The final determination of project eligibility will
remain the sole authority of the MSRC. As the RTPA, RCTC respectfully submits
the following work plan for consideration to receive $1.25 million in Clean
Transportation Funding for the Traffic Signal Coordination CTC Partnership Program
(Traffic Signal Program).
3. WORK PLAN -PROPOSED PROJECTS
Recently, RCTC released a Multi-Funding Call for Projects for a wide variety of
street improvements, expanded freeway interchanges, and active transportation
improvements for bicyclists and pedestrians. A total of 55 projects were submitted
through the Call for Projects requesting $282 million in funding. Of the 55 projects
submitted, the following three projects are ideal for allocation under the Traffic Signal
Program for Western Riverside:
• Project Title: Traffic Flow Improvements
Lead Agency: City of Eastvale
Total Project Cost: $383,300
Agency Match: $116,725
Proposed MSRC Funding: $74,625 (19% of Total Project Cost)
Other Funding: $191,950
Project Description: Install traffic synchronization to six (6) existing traffic
signalized intersections along Hamner Avenue from Schleisman to Eastvale
Gateway.
• Project Title: Traffic Signal Synchronization -an Element of the
Transportation Management Center
Lead Agency: City of Moreno Valley
Total Project Cost: $2,400,000
Agency Match: $268,300
Proposed MSRC Funding: $490,000 (20% of Total Project Cost)
Other Funding: $1,641,700
Project Description: The proposed work includes the deployment of critical
field devices and supporting communications system as a part of the City's
traffic management system. Improvements include an Ethernet fiber-optic
backbone system, CCTV cameras at 16 key intersections, and new traffic
signal controllers at 45 existing signalized intersections.
• Project Title: Magnolia Avenue Signal Interconnect
Lead Agency: City of Riverside
Total Project Cost: $1,855,000
Agency Match: $462,500
Proposed MSRC Funding: $375,000 (20% of Total Project Cost)
Other Funding: $1,017,500
Project Description: Remove existing interconnect copper wires and
replace them with fiber optic interconnects. Project will connect 49 signalized
intersections within the city of Riverside and future connection to the city of
Corona's Traffic Management Center, Moreno Valley and Caltrans.
In Coachella Valley, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG)
released a Call for Projects in December 2013. Results from that call are due in
February 2014. Once finalized, CVAG will identify project(s) for proposed MSRC
funding in an amount not to exceed $310,375. Once completed, RCTC will
submit the proposed Coachella Valley project(s) for MSRC's review.
4. PROPOSED BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
A proposed budget and implementation schedule is attached as Exhibit A. Copies of
the actual proposals received under the Call for Projects are also available if
needed.
5. AIR QUALITY BENEFITS
A component of RCTC's Call for Projects included an Air Quality Analysis and
Benefit-Cost Analysis for the three proposed projects; results are attached as
Exhibit B.
6. WORK PLAN STATUS AND POTENTIAL REVISION
RCTC submits the proposed projects and budget in draft form and expects revisions
as we collaborate with CVAG and MSRC. A final work plan, budget and schedule
will be submitted at that time.
MSRC's Traffic Signal Coordination CTC Partnership Program Attachment A Recommended MSRC lead Agency/Applicant Project Title Total Project Cost Agency Match MSRC Funding Other Funding Match% Start End -Eastvale Traffic Flow Improvements $ 383,300 $ 116,725 $ 74,625 $ 191,950 19% 5/2014 5/2015 Moreno Valley Traffic Signal Synchronization Project $ 2,400,000 $ 268,300 $ 490,000 $ 1,641,700 20% 1/2014 7/2015 Riverside Magnolia Avenue Signal Interconnect $ 1,855,000 $ 462,500 $ 375,000 $ 1,017,500 20% 2/2014 9/2015 CVAG TBD based on CVAG's Call for Projects $ 310,375 $ 1,250,000 Recommended MSRC funding based on the following information: Funding Percentages Used for Recommended MSRC Funding Available 2014 STIP Geographic Areas Amount $ 1,250,000 75.17% Western County $ 939,625 24.12% Coachella Valley (CV) 0.71% Palo Verde Valley {PW) 24.83% CV & PW {Blythe) Total 310,375 1,250,000
ATTACHMENT B
Riverside County Transportation Commission
2013 Multi Funding Call for Projects
Western Riverside County Air Quality Benefit Assessment
3.14 Hamner Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization
Implementing Agency: City of Eastvale
Project Description:
Air Quality Analysis:
ROG Emission CO Emission
Benefits Benefits
(kg/day) (kg/day)
0.230 3.945
Benefit Cost Analysis Results:
.!::!!!:9'.d• Costs mil $
Life-Cyde Benefits (mi
Net Present Value (mil.
J:3ent;fit I Cost Ratio:
Rate of Return on Investment: ······························-·----'---
Payback Peflod:·
NO. Emission PM 10 Emission PM 2.s Emission
Benefits Benefits
(kg/day) (kg/day)
0.351 0.046
INVESTMENT ANALYSIS
SUllllARY' RESULlS
~~-~l
1 ye.-~
Person-Hours of lime-Saved
C02 Emissions Sawd (tons}
Benefits
(kg/day)
0.043
C02 Emissions Sawd (mil.$)
C02E Emission
Benefits
(kg/day)
2,333.155
3.20 Traffic Signal Synchronization
Riverside County Transportation Commission
2013 Multi Funding Call for Projects
Western Riverside County Air Quality Benefit Assessment
Implementing Agency: City of Moreno Valley
Project Description:
Air Quality Analysis:
ROG Emission CO Emission
Benefits Benefits
(kg/day) (kg/day)
3.844 55.921
Benefit Cost Analysis Results:
Benefit I Cost Ratio:
Payback Period:
NO. Emission PM 10 Emission PM 2•5 Emission
Benefits Benefits
(kg/day) (kg/day)
0.378 0.136
IWESTMENT ANALYSIS
SUllllARY RESULlS
1,_-i
ITEMIZED Bl!NEFllS (mil. $)
Travel Time Savings
Person-Hours of Time Saved
C02 Emissions Saved (tons}
Benefits
(kg/day)
0.126
C02 Emissions Saved (mil. $}
C02E Emission
Benefits
(kg/day)
11,087.046
Riverside County Transportation Commission
2013 Multi Funding Call for Projects
Western Riverside County Air Quality Benefit Assessment
3.33 Magnolia Avenue Traffic Signal Technology Upgrade
Implementing Agency: City of Riverside
Project Description: This project will upgrade the traffic signal coordination technology along Magnolia
Avenue from Buchanan to Third Street by removing existing interconnect copper wires and replacing
them with fiber optic interconnects.
Air Quality Analysis:
ROG Emission CO Emission NO. Emission PM 10 Emission PM 2•5 Emission C02E Emission
Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits Benefits
(kg/day) (kg/day) (kg/day) (kg/day) (kg/day) (kg/day)
4.357 34.927 5.498 0.168 0.155 4,513.52
Benefit Cost Analysis Results:
The applicant provided a detailed Benefit Cost assessment that quantified the benefit ratio as 11.5:1. There is not
enough raw data in the application to replicate this value; however, it appears reasonable relative to similar projects
in this category.
AGENDA ITEM 14
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 14.
AGENDA ITEM 15
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 15.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: January 31, 2014
TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission
Technica!Advjsory TUMF Subcommittee FROM:
Shirley Medina, Planning and,Programming Director
THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Transportation Unjform Mitigation .Fee Regional Arterial Program Funds for
the Perris Boulevard Widening Project . . ·
TECHNICAL ADVISORY TUMF SUBCOMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMBNDATION:
This item 'is for the Commission 'to:
1) Approve the request from the city of Moreno Valley (Moreno Valley) for $3 million in
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Regional Arterial program funds for the
construction of the Perris. Boulevard widening project, Ironwood Avenue to Manzanita
Avenue;
2) Approve ~greemeot No. 06-72-041-03, Amendment No.. 3 to Agreement
No. 06-72-04t-OO, with Moreno Valley to add TUMF funds in the amount of $3 million
for construction; and · ·' '
3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute
the agreement ·on behalf of the Commission;
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Moreno Valley is requesting $3 million of TUMF Regional Arterial program funds to complete
the funding for the Perris Boulevard widening project from Ironwood Avenue to Manzanita
Avenue. The proposed funding includes:
Fund Source Construction Amount Comment
TUMF Regional Arterial $ 1,600,000 Commission approved 10/09/13
Prop lB State-Locaf Partnership 1,000,000 CTC extension deadline, May 2014
.City Funds 400,000
Funding Shortfall 3,000,000 Requesting TUMF Regional Arterial
Total Construction $ 6,000,000
As noted above, the Commission recently approved reprogramming $1.6 million in project
savings from the widening of Perris Boulevard from Cactus Avenue to Perris Valley Storm Drain
Lateral "B" segment to the Ironwood-Manzanita segment. The Technical Advisory TUMF
Subcommittee, consisting of public works directors, meets periodically to review programmi~g
neeas, status of revenues, project prioritization and delivery. ·The subcommittee convened on
January 15 to di5cuss»M,o._re,no Valley's request and ta review 'be adjustments to the TUMF
revenue forecast. aased · on revised TUMF revenue projections and the conclusion of the
,FY '2oi:2/13 fiscal audit, the ·TUMF projected fund balance avaUable as. of June 30, 2015, has
been revised to $14. 7 million. The subcommittee continues to support construction
programming as a high priority. Given the lapsing deadline of the State Proposition 18 funds
j;lnd the Perris Boulevard project is ready for construction, the ·Staff and the subcommittee
. recommend approval of Moreno Valley's request for $3 million of TUMF Regional Arterial funds
for this project.
Jhe subcomrriittee also discussed the need to reevaluate current 'projects approved as part of
.the.~orjginaLTUME Regional Arteri.al program in 2004. · Ove{the i'l'¢X,t. few months, project
sp~~s~r~ will. p.rovide ui»dat~s on th; projects, and the subcommittee will consider prioritizing
the projects according .to.~ei:y so,edtdes and any past. 9C1;iQO:S. taken.· by ~t® CPmmission pr
·-' .. ,,,. ., ' • ' "•' •.• ·" «· •
local agencies that may have impacted the priority or feasibility of the projects originally
approved in 2004. In addition, the 10 percent set-aside for developer credit r:eirnburs~ment
will also be reviewed and adjusted to reflect the revenue adjustment.
Financial ·information
' . . ·,,.' ; .. . .. 'I,,
In Fiscal Year Budget: I N/ A I Year: I FY 2014/15+ Amount: I $3,000,000 ·
... sua.get AdJustment: I N/ A
GL/Project Accounting No.: 005105 81301 210 72 81301
FiSc::a1·Prot:ectures·Approved~ · I Date: I · · 01/21/-14