HomeMy Public PortalAbout03 March 17, 2014 Technical Advisory CommitteeCOMM-TAC-00028
TIME:
DATE:
LOCATION:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA*
*Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda.
10:00 A.M. to 12:00 P.M.
March 17, 2014
Beaumont City Hall
Conference Room #2
550 East Sixth Street
Beaumont, CA 92223
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special
assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact the Riverside County Transportation Commission
at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that
reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting.
1. Call to Order
2. Self -Introductions
3. Approval of January 27, 2014 Minutes
4. Public Comments (This is for comments on items not listed on agenda. Comments
relating to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is before the Committee.)
5. 2013 FTIP Update (Attachment)
6. Obligation Authority Delivery Plan FY 2013/14 (Attachment)
7. 2014 STIP Update (Attachment)
8. Active Transportation Program — CTC Guidelines and Application for Statewide and MPO
Funding (Attachment)
9. Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Grant (Attachment)
10. Local Assistance Update (Verbal Presentation)
11. March Commission Meeting Highlights (Verbal Presentation)
12. Other Business
13. Adjournment (The next meeting will be May 19 in Riverside.)
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
March 17, 2014
Page 2
14. An SB 821 TAC Subcommittee meeting will convene immediately following this TAC
meeting.
.... TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE March 17, 2014 Kahono Oei BAN~~~~y I DUANE!~; MEMBER +--. --ALTERNATE PRINT NAME SIGNATURE BEAUMONT BLYTHE CVAG CALIMESA Director of Public Works KEVIN HUGHES I Kelsey Gormley -----7<_~ fJUV 'f, RVt>Htr<:: Consultant IManagementAnalyst I ~"":) (>to'fn"-':4--+--__._. __ T--T_ -lARMANDO BALDIZZONE Frank Luck1no 1 I Director of Public Works Finance Director I 1 Allyn Waggle ~I ---A-({ ._ , ·, { _ ~ ,( Deputy Director --"\.,•'l W ~L~ , i1 7r MICHAEL SHOBERG Transportation Program Manager MICHAEL THORNTON City Engineer .. 1~:1~~~~sDirector Hi~ .,-....,j ~~ I ------.. I CAL TRANS lsEAN YEUNG i s :__ v.~1 J~-'I . ~~~~;e~~strict Local Assistance I 5-e t1 !~Ye <!11,J -___ IL._ ___ _ HABIB~OTLAGH-VICECHAIR . Grc<J.. l)r.,pA B j f>ru J : ~ ~ CANYON LAKE CATHEDRAL CITY IBILL SIMONS Interim City Engineer ----City Engineer 7 r PY I' ~ /" _____ _ • ···-jotud-~~ ~ L ~ f<~ Ma2-iNI Maritza Martinez Interim Public Works Director COACHELLA I JONATHAN HOY· CHAIR City Engineer CORONA NELSON NELSON Robert Morin DESERT HOT SPRINGS I Acting Public Works Director I RUDY ACOSTA Acting Public Works Director Principal Civil Engineer 1Daniel Porras v I VAt-> la,.... ~~ I Public Works Contract Engineer I ~~
--= .... EASTVALE HEMET INDIAN WELLS INDIO TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE March 17, 2014 GEORGE ALVAREZ City Engineer JORGE BIAGIONI Joe lndrawan Victor Monz Engineering Director/City Engineer i Principal Engineer KENSEUMALO Public Works Director Bondie Baker Assistant Engineer II -· GRANT EKLUND ITom Rafferty Public Works Director/City Engineer , Principal Civil Engineer '1t.Htt"r €'1'.i«JILD JURUPA VALLEY [ROY STEPHENSON ·1Mike Myers Public Works Director/City Engineer Assistant City Engineer LA QUINTA !TIMOTHY JONASSON I Public Works Director/City Engineer I Bryan McKinney Principal Engineer Rita Thompson ~~ _,j ("--..~S} V'---1 jo6 I J.l'Ol~ ))j--ytJ ,.---__ LAKE ELSINORE IATI ESKANDARI Interim Public Works Director R~-1\oM f>S6YL I --~tWy----_~-1JONATHAN SMITH I Robert Johnson i ./) A 17 -, -.. . I 0}i / :L-MENIFEE i Public Works Director/City Engineer cCi~Manager I KAF~L-Iv {Mr/ Ne z-1 ~ f' v [a,,. AHMAD ANSARI I Prem Kumar l Public works Direc.t or/.Ci.ty. Eng.ineer 1:Deputy Public Works Director/ 1, Assistant City Engineer I I ---·-·---· ----MURRIETA leoe MOEHLING ------· ----!Jim Holsten i City Engineer Assistant City Manager 1 ~co le1LL THOMPSON --------1Lori Askew 1·----.--.... _._.. -_ ... I Water and Sewer Manager I Director of Public Works , MORENO VALLEY
-PALM DESERT I BO CHEN City Engineer TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE March 17, 2014 , Mark Diercks 1Transportation Engineer PALM SPRINGS IDAVE BARAKIAN Director of Public Works/ City Engineer Savat Khamphou '?AY/11' {f/Jfl!/#Jll i y,t PERRIS I HABIB MOTLAGH I City Engineer RTA GORDON ROBINSON Director of Planning RANCHO MIRAGE j BRUCE HARRY I Director of Public Works +TOM BOYD I Public Works Director RIVERSIDE COUNTYjPATRICiA ROMO Assistant Director of Transportation 6c '"Cl g ro ph7 I. Lorelle Moe-Luna 1 Senior Planner Bill Enos City Engineer Farshid Mohammadi Engineering Manager . ·-Mojahed Salama /3 i-eoJ. {!;;,Coph7 Yl l/(,.i. ~a-?cct\y ~ «lO SAN JACINTO ~ph7 -~··--·····----·-·· ····--·---------+--HABIB MOTLAGH i BruA !Yopk.. f3 \ City Engineer : I ("d\ SUNLINE TEMECULA WILDOMAR ' JOE FORGIARINI ···-··· [ .' ····--·~---. ·. ··-··· Director of Transit Planning -------·-·----TOM GARCIA i Greg Butler Public Works Director iAssistant City Manager DAN YORK Janet Morales Administrative Assistant I Director of Public Works/City I I Engineer I RUTHANNE TAYLOR BERGER Donna Dean WR COG Deputy Executive Director Program Manager Dan Yo1f!--~~ ·-----I iEk /~4~ ' r;is. ~'ck t-A..e~~M~'-' ~~ ~~
-TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE March 17, 2014 ~1vte&1::E:~ ~srt ~~~~AT.1--tLT~i ~ ic~~~0~:~RE;;~D1r;~-6g1(.' ~--_-$ !~-----. •( t 1 ep0n~1> n ifJ2A_C,L.-€-(2.,!YJo~A-_/_._ .o(lG 6sQ413 -3i4:7n. G~,_pf'-[\ ~ \) K:R.1 t'TA I ~ l7i qE H L-1 N ( bMo ..,k \,'A~ e. M.v m ':..h ·"'f'<) ~ 7 / . 4<P I. {po 3(, f:.< qs[ S6$'Sf 3o {~:-Jf-46. N LlR\..A eeCb: f?:l_6 ---------------------------~?Skc.KYvtfp VL__f2z_()/_~~~?!-)n~tl. t.o/,y\ I (J :7 <¥ ,U~ I v, ~77>?-. /'1.;t,yz..... I Vll?MIZ e 017u""#p;>H,PY.-"'17 ~,/.. -;~ 2P4-_7 _ __, ---------+-I -·-· --~-------·-----~----+------------~----------------!----------------------·-· ----+-------·------·-------------ct 1-----------------------1--·-·---~--J-------·------·-·----.. -------.. ·--·-.. --------+--------·------·-----·--·-----------------·---·
MINUTES
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
MINUTES
Monday, January 27, 2014
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC) was called to order at 10:04 a.m. at the Riverside County Transportation
Commission, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA.
2. SELF -INTRODUCTIONS
Members Present:
Others Present:
George Alvarez, City of Eastvale
Ahmad Ansari, City of Moreno Valley
Amer Attar, City of Temecula
Dave Barakian, City of Palm Springs
Armando Baldizzone, City of Blythe
Donna Dean, WRCOG
Mark Diercks, City of Palm Desert
Ati Eskandari, City of Lake Elsinore
Joe Forgiarini, SunLine Transit Agency
Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage
Kevin Hughes, City of Beaumont
Tim Jonasson, City of LaQuinta
Prem Kumar, City of Moreno Valley
LoreIle Moe -Luna, Riverside Transit Agency
Farshid Mohammadi, City of Riverside
Victor Monz, City of Hemet
Habib Motlagh, Cities of Canyon Lake, Perris, and San Jacinto
Robert Morin, City of Corona
Kahono Oei, City of Banning
Daniel Porras, City of Desert Hot Springs
Tom Rafferty, City of Indio
Patty Romo, County of Riverside
Ken Seumalo, City of Indian Wells
Bill Simons, City of Cathedral City
Roy Stephenson, City of Jurupa Valley
Michael Thornton, City of Calimesa
Allyn Waggle, CVAG
Dan York, City of Wildomar
Fred Alamolhoda, LAE Associates, Inc.
Grace Alvarez, RCTC
Randy Anstine, City of Calimesa
Eric DeHate, RCTC
Albert Espinoza, City of Corona
Shirley Gooding, RCTC
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
January 27, 2014
Page 2
Kelsey Gormley, City of Beaumont
Jillian Guizado, RCTC
Aaron Hake, RCTC
Rohan Kuruppu, Riverside Transit Agency
Tanya Love, RCTC
Leif Lovegren, Riverside Transit Agency
Eric Lewis, City of Moreno Valley
Shirley Medina, RCTC
Roy Null, County of Riverside
Gary Slater, Caltrans
Rita Thompson, City of Lake Elsinore
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/S/C (Mohammadi/Barakian) so approve the minutes as submitted.
Abstain: Bruce Harry
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
5. 2013 FTIP UPDATE
Eric DeHate, RCTC, reported SCAG has processed 16 amendments to the 2013 FTIP encompassing
nine formal amendments and seven administrative modifications. RCTC has participated in 15 out
of the 16 amendments submitted, totaling changes to 218 projects. As of today, all amendments
have been approved.
Mr. DeHate brought attention to the amendment schedule for the 2013 FTIP, which is attached to
his staff report. New projects and revisions to projects due to the 2013 Multi -funding Call for
Projects will be included in formal amendment number 17 due to RCTC February 14. The
amendments will be due to SCAG February 25 with anticipated approval April 25.
He further pointed out the amendment log that identifies each amendment, when it was due to
RCTC, when it was submitted to SCAG, the anticipated approval, and when it was approved. For
projects that need amending in order to submit RFA's to Caltrans, the anticipated date of approval
should give TAC members a good working estimate for submissions. For the STP rehab projects, all
amendments have been approved to move forward with requesting the federal project numbers
from Caltrans Local Assistance.
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
January 27, 2014
Page 3
6. 2015 FTIP UPDATE —TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURE PROJECTS
Eric DeHate thanked the TAC representatives for providing the necessary information for the 2015
FTIP update. The table he provided highlights four major categories in the 2015 FTIP update. There
were 249 carry-over projects with changes; 82 completed projects; 10 deleted projects; and 41 new
projects for a total of 382 projects. Most of the new projects resulted in projects being added from
the 2013 Multi -funding Call for Projects.
He stated that also included in the 2015 FTIP update are old and new Transportation Control
Measures (TCMs). TCMs are specific transportation projects that help improve air quality,
regardless of the funding source. While Riverside County stretches into three air basins, the only
one that currently has TCMs is the South Coast Air Basin, which includes Western Riverside County.
These projects need to be delivered by their completion date. He stressed failure to deliver these
projects by their completion date could jeopardize conformity for the entire SCAG region. If
conformity is lost, all federal funding in the region comes to a halt. He asked jurisdictions review
projects on the list and to ensure the projects are delivered by their completion date.
7. DRAFT FFY 2013/14 DELIVERY PLAN
Grace Alvarez, RCTC, said the federal obligation delivery plan will soon be due to Caltrans. In
anticipation of the early spring 2014 deadline, a FFY 2013/14 Obligation Delivery Plan was drafted
that is attached to the staff report. It includes 44 projects with federal STP and CMAQ funds
programmed for obligation in FFY 2013/14.
She further stated the delivery plan is an important tool for RCTC and Caltrans to estimate the level
of federal obligations for the year. The TAC's input with the updated schedules will help staff
determine if there is sufficient OA to fund all the projects programmed in FY 2013/14 and/or if we
have additional OA that can be loaned to another region. Caltrans also utilizes our Obligation
Delivery Plan to determine if the state as a whole would be able to obligate 100% of its OA and/or if
there is an opportunity to advance projects from future years to help achieve the OA goal.
She said RCTC was not one of the August Redistribution recipients but had a good delivery record of
88.9%. She recommended the jurisdictions keep project schedules on track and help the region
achieve 100% of its OA in FY 2013/14.
8. MULTI -FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS — COMMISSION APPROVAL
Shirley Medina, RCTC, reported the Commission approved the projects at the January meeting. She
suggested the TAC refer to the schedule attached to her current staff report showing each
project and when it will be included in the FTIP. She also stated a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) will be prepared for all the project sponsors. A draft MOU is being developed after which
she will meet with each project sponsor to review the project specific MOU's.
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
January 27, 2014
Page 4
9. 2014 STIP SUBMITTAL
Ms. Medina stated the 2014 STIP submittal was due to the CTC in December. The STIP adoption is
scheduled for March 20, 2014.
10. ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM — DRAFT GUIDELINES AND UPCOMING CALL FOR PROJECTS
Ms. Alvarez reported staff has actively followed and participated in the draft ATP guidelines. The
guidelines require two public hearings. The first public hearing took place January 22 in Los Angeles.
The second one is scheduled before the CTC on January 29 in Sacramento. The ATP guidelines will
be approved on March 20. Following this approval, the CTC will receive the ATP applications for the
50% funding that goes to the state. There will also be an opportunity for the regions to compete for
funding through the MPOs. SCAG, which is the MPO for southern California, will receive 40% of the
ATP funds. The 10% remaining will be available for rural and small urban areas.
11. TIGER VI FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
Aaron Hake, RCTC, reported the appropriations bill was passed for the rest of the fiscal year. $600
million was put into nationally competitive programs. USDOT had not stated what the timing is;
however, if passed there will be a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) within the next couple of
months with draft criteria. It is expected project awards will be made this year. Nationally
significant projects will be priorities.
12. MEASURE A LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS MID -YEAR REVENUE PROJECTIONS
Grace Alvarez reported the Commission at its meeting of January 8 approved the Measure A Mid -
Year Revenue Projections presented by its CFO, Theresia Trevino. The Mid -Year Measure A
Revenues for FY 2013/14 increased by $10 million, resulting in an additional $2.171 million available
for the Western County and $844,000 for the Eastern County. She referenced the Measure A
allocation projections for FY 2013/14 and FY 2014/15 attached to the report. She also said the
FY 2014/15 revenue projections are $10 million higher than the revised FY 2013/14 projections.
13. MSRC'S CLEAN TRANSPORTATION FUNDING —TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION PROGRAM
Tanya Love, RCTC, provided a Traffic Signal Coordination/CTC Partnership Program document. She
reported the MSRC allocated $5 million for signal synchronization projects. Each CTC was allotted
$1.25 million. RCTC took eligible projects from the Multi -funding Call for Projects and identified
three projects that would qualify for the funding; they are Eastvale, Moreno Valley, and Riverside,
which are identified in the document provided. She also stated approximately 25% was set aside
for CVAG's call for projects due February 2014.
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
January 27, 2014
Page 5
The CMAQ funds these 3 projects received will go back to the regional reserve and will be replaced
with the MSRC funds. This information is due to MSRC January 31 in draft format. Once it is
completed, it will go to the Commission for final action.
M/S/C (Ansari/Alvarez) to approve submittal of the Eastvale, Moreno Valley, and Riverside
projects.
14. LOCAL ASSISTANCE UPDATE
Sean Yeung, Caltrans Local Assistance, provided an update on the new Section 106 Programmatic
Agreement for historical properties, reporting there is a new short form checklist PA 106, which is
one of the studies for the NEPA process. The form is on the Local Assistance website under
Department of Local Assistance.
Regarding the MAP-21 Buy America requirements, Mr. Yeung reported the waiver for Buy America
expired at the end of 2013. The new Buy America requirements apply to utility relocations.
Caltrans created a Buy America task force that will hold conferences, seminars, and workshops to
provide guidance to the local agencies and utility providers regarding the new regulations. The task
force may be accessed at (916) 654-5170. Caltrans website has frequently asked questions/answers
and list all webinars and seminars available.
Mr. Yeung also indicated that in the past, Caltrans listed on a quarterly basis inactive projects for
which an invoice had not been received by Local Assistance in over six months; the due date for
submitting invoices to Caltrans was also included. There is no longer a set due date but a rolling
due date that is 30 days prior to the one year anniversary since the last invoice was received. The
information regarding invoicing is posted on the Local Assistance website. He said FHWA conveyed
to Local Assistance when the one year is up, projects will not be deobligated the next day but at the
end of that federal quarter. Currently, we are in the second federal quarter that runs from January
1 through March 30.
Shirley Medina requested Local Assistance provide an updated engineering staffing directory.
Mr. Yeung stated Local Assistance is in the process of updating it.
Gary Slater, Interim Deputy Director, Caltrans, reported Bill Mosby retired and agencies are
welcome to go through his office if necessary.
15. JANUARY COMMISSION MEETING HIGHLIGHTS
Ms. Medina reported the Commission approved:
• Resolutions of Necessity related to the SR-91 project;
• The mid -year budget adjustment;
• The Multi -funding call for Projects;
• The 2014 legislative program and platform.
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
January 27, 2014
Page 6
She stated she would email RCTC's workshop agenda to the TAC. The workshop is scheduled for
January 30 and 31 and will include items such as rail in the Coachella Valley and 10-year delivery
plan.
16. OTHER BUSINESS
Ms. Medina reported the TUMF subcommittee discussed programming needs for TUMF projects in
the Western County and regional arterials. Moreno Valley requested an additional $3 M of TUMF
funds for its Perris Boulevard widening project from Ironwood to Manzanita Avenue. She stated the
project has State Local Partnership Program (SLPP) competitive funds of $1 million that received an
extension of time approval by the CTC to allow more time to secure the additional $3 M funding gap
for project implementation. After reviewing the latest mid -year budget adjustment and revenue
projections, there is an increase in the TUMF regional arterials fund balance as of June 30, 2013.
The TUMF subcommittee recommended programming $3 million for the Perris Boulevard project.
There is still a balance of TUMF funds the subcommittee will review in the next few months.
17. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee, the
meeting adjourned at approximately 11:05 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
d��
Shirley Medina
Planning and Programming Director
AGENDA ITEM 5
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
March 17, 2014
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager
Eric DeHate, Staff Analyst
SUBJECT:
2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
2013 FTIP
On January 27, 2014 RCTC staff presented updates to the 2013 FTIP and reported the
approval of Formal Amendments and Administrative Modifications 1-16 totaling changes to
218 projects and RCTC participated in 15 of 16 Amendments.
Since then, Formal Amendment No. 17 was submitted to SCAG on February 25, 2014
encompassing 32 projects, including many projects from RCTC's 2013 Multi -Funding Call for
projects. RCTC anticipates approval of this amendment by the end of April. Changes based
on project milestone updates to the 2013 STP Pavement Rehabilitation Call for projects will
be included in Administrative Modification No. 18.
The following revised table is the schedule of upcoming Formal Amendments and
Administrative Modifications up to October 2014. After October 2014, it is anticipated the
2015 FTIP will be approved.
2013 FTIP Amendment/Administrative Modification Schedule
Due to RCTC
Due to SCAG
Amendment/Administrative
Modification No.
Formal or Administrative
2/14/2014
2/25/2014
13-17
Formal
3/25/2014
4/01/2014
13-18
Administrative
6/17/2014
6/24/2014
13-19
Formal
7/22/2014
7/29/2014
13-20
Administrative
8/19/2014
8/26/2014
13-21
Formal
9/23/2014
9/30/2014
13-22
Administrative
10/21 /2014
10/28/2014
13-23
Formal
Attachment: 2013 FTIP Amendment Log
2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program - Amendment Submittals and Approval Dates
2013 FTIP
Purpose
No. of Projects
Due to RCTC
Due to SCAG
Anticipated Approval
Final Approval
Final
12/13/2012
Amendment 1
Formal Amendment
53
10/8/2012
10/22/2012
1/31/2013
1/24/2013
Amendment 2
Administrative Modification
23
11/19/2012
11/27/2012
12/15/2013
12/19/2012
Amendment 3
Formal Amendment
14
12/17/2012
1/8/2013
3/15/2013
3/13/2013
RTP Consistency
Amendment/Amendment 4
Formal Amendment
1
1/9/2013
1/14/2013
6/30/2013
Amendment 5
Administrative Modification
15
1/24/2013
2/5/2013
2/28/2013
2/21/2013
Amendment 6
Formal Amendment
8
2/25/2013
3/5/2013
4/30/2013
4/18/2013
Amendment 7"
Formal Amendment
2/27/2013
4/30/2013
3/22/2013
Amendment 8
Administrative Modification
15
4/1/2013
4/9/2013
4/30/2013
4/25/2013
Amendment 9
Formal Amendment
15
4/29/2013
5/7/2013
6/21/2013
6/27/2013
Amendment 10
Administrative Modification
4
5/28/2013
6/4/2013
6/28/2013
6/25/2013
Amendment 11
Formal Amendment
10
6/27/2013
7/2/2013
8/23/2013
9/5/2013
Amendment 12
Administrative Modification
6
7/24/2013
7/31/2013
8/30/2013
8/22/2013
Amendment 13
Formal Amendment
28
8/23/2013
9/3/2013
10/25/2013
11/5/2013
Amendment 14
Administrative Modification
2
9/24/2013
10/1/2013
10/25/2013
10/23/2013
Amendment 15
Formal Amendment
5
10/22/2013
10/29/2013
12/18/2013
12/18/2013
Amendment 16
Administrative Modification
19
11/25/2013
12/3/2013
12/26/2013
12/30/2013
Amendment 17
Formal Amendment
32
2/14/2014
2/25/2014 4/25/2014
I
Total Number of Projects
250
"RCTC did not participate in this Amendment
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of March 11, 2014
3/11 /2014 - 1:10 PM Page 1 of 36
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1
October 2012
RCTC
am sm.
twerude (everyT.
FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
CALTRANS
RIVLS01
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP COLLISION REDUCTION
PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 -
RR/HY CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC
W
CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS
AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMNT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING
IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS
Cost Increase (EA: 0M420 added to FY 2012/2013, OP280 added
to FY 2013/2014, OR740 added to FY 2014/2015).
CALTRANS
RIVLS09
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP MANDATES PROGRAM:
PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 - RR/HWY
CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC CNTRL
DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS AT
INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMNT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING
IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS
New Project - EA: 0M310
City of Riverside
RIV120801
IN RIVERSIDE FOR RIVERSIDE SPECIAL SERVICES - CAPITALIZED PREVENTATIVE
MAINTENANCE (FY 12 - 5307) (UZA: RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for the City of Riverside
City of Riverside
RIV120802
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RIVERSIDE SPECIAL SERVICES - LEASE OF XEROX
MACHINE TO SUPPORT TRANSIT DIVISION NEEDS, PER APPROVED 2012/2013 SRTP -
TABLE 4, PROJECT NO. FY 13-4 (FY 13 - 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for the City of Riverside
COACHELLA
RIV061159
AT SR86/Avenue 50: Widen and construct new 6 through lane IC from E/O Coachella Stormwater
Channel Bridge to E/O Tyler St. Improvements include: extended ramp acceleration/deceleration
lanes, relocate/realign Ave 50 and Tyler St, bike lanes, sidewalks, and reconstruct traffic signals
(SAFETEA-LU 1702, CA 583, #2543) (EA: 0C970).
Cost decrease based on revised engineer's estimate and schedule
delay, per current PA&ED start phase.
COACHELLA
RIV071246
In the City of Coachella - Construct new (Non -capacity) Ave 52 Grade Separation overhead
structure spanning over UPRR mainline tracks and Grapefruit Blvd/Hwy 111, from Shady Ln to
approx 600' E/O Industrial Way/Tyler St. Improvements incl: Reconfig connection from Ave 52 to
Grapefruit Blvd/Hwy 111, bike Ins, sidewalks, retaining walls, reconst traffic rigs/driveways, remove
existing at -grade crossing.
Reprogramming of funding mainly needed to utilize CITY funding
for R/W and increase CMAQ in construction.
Minor project description made to correct the problem in the
database with ft (" instead of') - abbreviation to the crossing at the
end of the project description was needed to stay within the
character limitation.
Additionally, Sec 125 Surface Transportation Priorities funding was
deleted and FFY 2009 Appropriation Earmark added to clarify the
earmark appropriation in 2009 (Public Law 111-8).
Corona
RIV010209
In the City of Corona - Construct Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension 4 lane road from Lincoln Ave
to Paseo Grande (Approx 2.5 miles)
Cost decrease based on current engineer's estimate and minor
schedule delay that does not impact the model (2014).
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM
Page 2 of 36
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1
October 2012
RCTC
ma .....
flints* Cooler WIMOMOten (worn
FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Corona
RIV011240
In Corona on existing McKinley St - Construct grade separation at BNSF Railroad crossing (project
study report & preliminary environmental analysis report activities).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years
CVAG
RIV090102
In the Coachella Valley PM-10 Progra - Clean Vehicle Acquisition Program: Fleet acquisition of
alternative fuel sweepers for regional street sweeping program of major arterials, for the reduction of
PM10 fugitive dust throughout the Coachella Valley ($229 toll credits used to match CMAQ in const).
Reprogram funding from FY 2013/2014 to FY 2014/2015
Desert Hot Springs
RIV061161
Essential road improvements - Phase III: City Section 31 including pavement rehab, sidewalks,
curb/gutters, cross gutters, ADA ramps & drainage improvements on Ramona Dr., Cactus Dr., El
Cajon Dr., La Mesa Dr., Caliente Dr. (Bunch Palms Tr to Hacienda Ave); and Hacienda Ave &
Ironwood Dr (Palm Dr to Ramona Dr).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years
Indio
RIV121102
In Eastern Riverside County in the City of Indio - Monroe Street Widening: Widening of Monroe St
between Ave. 49 and Ave. 52 (Approx. 7,800 L.F.), from 2 through lanes to 4 through lanes (2 lanes
in ea dir), including bike lane, sidewalk, traffic signal install at Ave. 49 and relocation of signal poles
and appurtenances at Ave. 50.
NEW SLPP Formula Funds project
Indio
RIV110831
In the City of Indio - Widen Jefferson St. from Varner Rd to Sun City Blvd from 4 to 6 lanes and
widen Varner Rd from 2 to 4 lanes from Jefferson St to approx. 500' East of Jefferson St and then
tapering back to 2 lanes. Incl medians, traffic signals, channelization, left -turn pockets, ded rt turn
lanes on SB Jefferson and EB Varner, drainage improvemetns, sidewalks, and bike lanes.
Cost Change &Schedule Delay
SLPP formula funds project
La Quinta
RIV121101
In Eastern Riverside County in the City of La Quinta - Intersection Improvements: Modify the
intersection at Hwy 111 and Washington St by adding left turn lanes, right turn lanes, median
modifications, res-striping, reconstruction of curb and gutter, signal and signal pole modifications,
and replacement of bus turnout.
NEW SLPP Formula Funds project
MURRIETA
RIV100106
In SW Riverside County - I-15/Los Alamos Rd. Bridge Replacement & Widening: Replacement of
existing two lane overcrossing at Los Alamos Rd. and Interstate 15 with a four lane overcrossing
(gap closure), bringing the bridge vertical clearance to Caltrans Standards.
Cost Change and Schedule Delay
SLPP formula funded project
Palm Desert
RIV071243
In the City of Palm Desert - Free right turn lane-WB Fred Waring Dr to NB Hwy 111: Reconfiguration
of a free right turn lane at the intersection from West Bound Fred Waring Dr to north bound Hwy 111
($61 toll credits used to match CMAQ in construction).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years
Palm desert
RIV071255
In the City of Palm Desert - Mid Valley Bike Path: Construct a 6.5 mile class 1 Bike Path along the
northern city limits between S/O Washington St. and N/O Monterey Ave.
Schedule Delay
Palm Desert
RIV031208
At 1-10/Monterey Ave IC - Reconfigure IC: Construct new WB entry ramp and realign/relocate WB
exit ramp (EA: OF050),
New project in the 2013 FTIP quadrennial years & Reprogramming
of funds
Palo Verde Valley
Transit Agency
RIV120803
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR PALO VERDE TRANSIT AGENCY - OPERATING
ASSISTANCE: FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A -RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR
2012/2013 (UZA: PALO VERDE).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Palo Verde Valley
Transit Agency
RCTC
RIV120201
On SR-60 near Beaumont: Construct new eastbound and westbound truck lanes from Gilman
Springs Rd to 1.6 miles west of Jack Rabbit Trail (EA: ON690) ($746 toll credits used to match
CMAQ in PA&ED).
Description change to combine RCTC's truck climbing lane with
Caltrans SHOPP Safety Improvements per agreement between
RCTC and Caltrans
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11 /2014 - 1:10 PrA
Page 3 of 36
RCTG
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1
October 2012 r
FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
RCTC
RIV520109
Reconstruct & Upgrade San Jacinto Branch Line for rail passenger service (Riverside to Perris)
(Perris Valley Line) (FY 07 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN).
Cost increase and adjustment to toll credit utilization in project
description.
PTA -RIP funding replaced with Surface Transportation Program -
RIP (federal), per CTC.
Riverside
RIV110116
In Riverside - Quiet Zone X-ing Improvements: Upgrade of 14 at -grade Hwy rail X-ing & one
pedestrian only at -grade X-ing along the BNSF San Bernardino Subd. & one at -grade Hwy -rail X-ing
along the UPRR Los Angeles Subd w/in the city of Riverside. The improvements are needed to
optimize safety at the X-ings and allow for quiet zone to mitigate existing and projected train horn
noise impacts.
Description change -grade crossings reduced from 14 to 11 based
on current conditions
Riverside County
RIV060123
In Northwest Riverside County on Clay St from approx. 100' SW of General Dr. to approx. 500' N/O
Linares Ave: Replace existing 4-lane (2 Ins in each direction) at grade R/R X-ing with a 4-Ln (2 Lns
in each direction -non-capacity) undercrossing (UPRR).
Cost decrease based on current engineer's estimate and minor
schedule delay.
CMAQ funds will be obligated in FY 2012/2013, utililzing the EPSP.
Riverside County
RIV031202
I-10 Bypass South: Construct two lanes of roadway to provide a by-pass/network facility for the 1-10,
approx. 1/2 mile S/O I-10 between the eastern end of the City of Banning and Apache Trail in
Cabazon. Other improvements include the construction of several low-water crossings at Smith
Creek and San Gorgonio River (PA&ED).
Cost Increase based on the latest engineer's estimate & Schedule
Advance
Riverside County
RIV060124
In Banning on Sunset Ave at I-10 from s/o Ramsey St to s/o Lincoln St: Lower Sunset Ave to
construct new 4-lane UC at UPRR crossing (non -capacity) and reconstruct the I-10 IC ramps to
meet the new street grade (SAFETEA CA438, #1261+ HR4818+HR3058) (EA:33471)
Cost Increase per latest TCIF baseline agreement &minor
schedule advance.
Riverside County
RIV011233
At I-15/Limonite Ave IC - Widen IC 4 to 6 Lns, widen NB and SB exit ramps 1 to 2 Ins, add 2 lane
loop ramps in the NB and SB directions & widen Limonite Ave from Hamner to Wineville 4 to 6 Lns
(approx 1 mi) (EA: 0E1050K).
New project in the 2013 FTIP quadrennial years &Reprogramming
of funds
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV091211
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - VEHICLE REPLACEMENT: PURCHASE FIFTY
(50) REPLACEMENT HEAVY DUTY CNG REVENUE VEHICLE ROLLING STOCK (FEDERAL
APPROPRIATION THROUGH HR 3288, FFY 2009/2010 - FTA 5309).
Description Change -FTIP project converted to Lump Sum Listing
per 2011 FTIP Guidelines, Grouped Project Listing Category 58
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120819
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA- REVENUE VEHICLES FOR CONTRACTED OPERATIONS:
PURCHASE OF SEVEN (7) MID -SIZE VEHICLES, REPLACING TYPE II VEHICLES THAT HAVE
REACHED THEIR SERVICE LIFE PER FTA GUIDELINES. REPLACEMENT VEHICLES WILL BE
USED FOR CONTRACT OPERATED FIXED ROUTE SERVICE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-
SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency -Project No. FY13-2
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120822
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED COST OF TIRE LEASE (FTA 5307 - FY 13)
(UZA:RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency - Project No. FY13-5
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120825
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - INFORMATION SYSTEMS: PURCHASE OF COMPUTERS
AND SOFTWARE SYSTEM FOR FIXED ROUTE VEHICLES, HEMET TRAINING ROOM
EQUIPMENT, AND RIVERSIDE CONFERENCE ROOM MONITORS - NON ITS COMPONENTS
(FTA 5307 - FY13) (UZA: RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency - Project No. FY13-8
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM
Page 4 of 36
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1
October 2012
RCM
"'..,—'
FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120826
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - OPERATING ASSISTANCE: FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A-
RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA:
HEMET).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency -Project No. FY13-8.
Project funding includes prior years carry overs.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120827
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE FOR FY
12-13 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB, TEM/MURR/MEN).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120828
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - CAPITAL COST OF CONTRACTING FOR FY 12-13 (FTA
5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120820
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - SUPPORT VEHICLE: PURCHASE OF ONE (1) VEHICLE
TO REPLACE A VEHICLE THAT HAS MET ITS USEFUL LIFE REQUIREMENT (FTA 5307 - FY 13)
(UZA: RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency - Project No. FY13-3
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120821
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - CAPITAL MAINTENANCE SPARES: PURCHASE OF
SPARE PARTS FOR ROLLING STOCK UNDER THE BUS MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (FTA 5307
- FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRT? for Riverside Transit
Agency - Project No. FY13-4
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120823
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - TRANSIT ENHANCEMENTS: PURCHASE AND
INSTALLATION OF TRANSIT ENHANCEMENTS FOR BUS STOP SYSTEM SUCH AS
INSTALLATION OF BUS SHELTERS AND BENCHES, KIOSKS, SIGNAGE, AND LIGHTING TO
ENHANCE SECURITY AND SAFETY OF THE RIDING PUBLIC (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency - Project No. FY13-6
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120824
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - SUPPORT EQUIPMENT: PURCHASE OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE
(E.G., VEHICLE JACKS, WHEELCHAIRS FOR OPERATOR TRAINING, POINJAR, AIR
COMPRESSORS/GENERATORS, AND FLOOR SCRUBBERS) (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit
Agency - Project No. FY13-7
SAN JACINTO
RIV111129
In San Jacinto — Ramona Exp Widening PH 1: Ramona Exp. Widening of 2 and 4 lanes to 6 lanes
regional arterial (3 in each direction) between Sanderson & Eagle Rd., including left -turn or
landscape median, drainage improvement, relocation of traffic signal poles and installation of curb
and gutter. Exist configuration varies from 2 and 4 lanes - widening will be from 2 to 6 and 4 to 6
Lanes.
Cost Increase based on the latest engineer's estimate &minor
schedule advance
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV110407
In the Coachella Valley for SunLine Transit Agency - Job Access & Reverse Commute and New
Freedom Project: Express Service to the Pass area with service to Banning and Beaumont,
connecting Coachella Valley commuters to Western Riverside County (FTA 5316 and FTA 5317,
FYs 09 and 10).
project description change to include additional stops in Cabazon,
Moreno Valle and Riverside; Conformity Category changed from
y' g
Exempt-93.126 to .
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120804
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A -RIDE
OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120805
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - CAPITALIZED PREVENTATIVE
MAINTENANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM
Page 5 of 36
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1
October 2012
RCTC
u'
R.
Riven* (dory Tnrpdrbnen Commor
FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120806
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY: REHABILITATION OF SUNLINE'S
FLEET OF OLDER BUSES, INCLUDING RESTORATION OF COLORS ON BOTH THE INTERIOR
AND EXTERIOR, AND PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT NEEDED TO REPAIR/REHAB BUSES (FY
13 - 5307) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
- Project No. SL 13-01.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120807
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE TWO REPLACEMENT
SERVICE TRUCKS AND FOUR REPLACEMENT CNG RELIEF CARS (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA:
INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
_project No. SL 13-02.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120808
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS:
REPAVE THE EXISTING BUS YARD AND STAFF PARKING AREA AT THE THOUSAND PALMS
OPERATING FACILITY (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
_project No. SL 13-03.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120809
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE TRANSIT STOP
ENHANCEMENTS FOR CONTINUED IMPROVEMENTS TO BUS STOPS FOR THE SAFETY AND
COMFORT OF PASSENGERS, PER COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
RECOMMENDATION (CA PROP 1 B SECURITY FUNDED PROJECT).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
- Project No. SL 13-04.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120810
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS:
IMPROVE THE THOUSAND PALMS AND INDIO FACILITIES, INCLUDING ROOF REPAIR AND
REPLACEMENT, NEW CARPETING AND BLINDS, AND REPAIR OF PARKING FACILITIES FOR
STAFF USE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
- Project No. SL 13-05.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120811
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FURNITURE REPLACEMENT:
PURCHASE OF OFFICE FURNITURE TO REPLACE AND ADD FURNITURE REACHES THE
END OF ITS CYCLE LIFE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
_Project No. SL 13-06.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120812
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE OF VARIOUS IT
EQUIPMENT, SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR EXISTING AGENCY SYSTEM NEEDS AND
TO STREAMLINE OPERATIONS AND PRODUCE REPORTS FOR SUNLINE SERVICES (FTA
5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
- Project No. SL 13-07.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120813
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE NEW MODERN,
STATE OF THE ART TELEPHONE SYSTEM, IMPROVING THE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR
SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
project No. SL 13-08.
SunLine Trans',:
Agency
RIV120814
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE FIVE (5) NEW SPARE
FAREBOXES TO ALLOW EXISTING UNITS TO BE REPAIRED WITHOUT BUS SERVICE
INTERRUPTION (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
_Project No. SL 13-09.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120815
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - CONDUCT A SAMPLE SURVEY
OF SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIDERS, PROVIDING USEFUL INFORMATION TO SUPPORT
SUNLINE PLANNING AND MARKETING EFFORTS. SURVEY WILL ALSO INCLUDE NTD
SECTION 15 RIDECHECKS (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
- Project No. SL 13-10.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120816
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY -PURCHASE MAJOR
REPLACEMENT MAINTENANCE TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT FOR ROUTINE VEHICLE
MAINTENANCE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
_project No. SL 13-11.
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120817
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - SPECIAL FUEL PROVISION
ALLOWING A PORTION OF AGENCY FUEL COSTS TO BE TREATED AS A CAPITAL
MAINTENANCE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency
project No. SL 13-12.
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM
Page 6 of 36
CD
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1
u ,,r,m,otoftnc
October 2012
FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
SunLine Transit
Agency
RIV120829
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - SOLAR PANEL REPLACEMENT:
REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING SOLAR PANELS, PROVING 33 PERCENT OF SUNLINE ENERGY
NEEDS FOR OPERATING OFFICES AND FACILITIES (PROJECT FUNDED BY FY 12 STATE OF
GOOD REPAIR, BUS LIVABILITY AND TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT).
New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit
Agency.
Number of Projects
53
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of March 11, 2014
3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM Page 7 of 36
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 2 `sm. —
,
November 2012 Irvrriait ,,.,o, .,.o ,,
SCAG approval: Dec. 19, 2012
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Beaumont
RIV100102
In Western Riverside Co in Beaumont: SR79 Bypass Ext No. Ph II - Instal of a 3-Ln pre-fab bridges
on the eastside of the Ph I Potrero Bridge SR79 Bypass Ext. No., extending the Potrero Blvd 0.675
mi. No. from the future SR60/Potrero Fwy IC (RIV050535), to connect to the Oak Valley Pkwy in
Beaumont, including the instal of a Class! multi -purpose trail, flared intersection and turning pockets.
Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP
Cathedral City
RIV070302
In Eastern Riverside County in the Coachella Valley - Date Palm Dr Bridge Replacement/Widening:
Replacement of a two lane (1 In in ea dir) low water crossing bridge over Long Canyon Creek (Bridge
No. 00L0043) with a six lane (3 Ins in ea dir), for approximately 350 ft. (from Varner Rd. to 350' S/O
Varner Rd).
9 of funding Reprogramming Years per HBP update of 10/29/2012.
Cathedral City
RIV091011
In Eastern Riverside County in the Coachella Valley - Date Palm Dr over the Whitewater River:
Widening of Date Palm Dr from 4 to 6 Ins (3 Ins in ea dir), from approx. 350 Ft S/O the bridge to 250
Ft N/O the bridge (Via Estrada to the north and Perez Rd. to the south), including the construction of
a raised median and sidewalk along the east side of the project (Bridge No. 56C0189).
Cost increase per HBP funding update of 10l29/2012.
Indio
RIV111202
In the City of Indio - Ave 44 Bridge Replacement: Replace existing Avenue 44 two lane low water
crossing over the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel with a four lane bridge (Bridge No. 00L0056),
including 6 ft sidewalk on each side of the bridge.
Reprog-amm ng of Ery:neering funding years per HBP funding
update cf 10/29.'2 , .2.
Lake Elsinore
RIV111203
In Lake Elsinore - Temescal Canyon Rd. Bridge Replacement/Widening: Replace Temescal Canyon
Rd. 2 lane bridge with a 4-lane bridge over Temescal Wash, 0.22 mi. W/O Lake Street (Bridge No.
56C0050).
Reprogramming of HBP per 10/29/2012 ::pdate.
Lake Elsinore
RIV091007
In mid -Western Riverside County in the City of Lake Elsinore: Widening of SR-74 from 2 to 4 through
lanes (2 lanes in each direction), west of 1-15 to the Ortega Mountains. Other improvements include
turn pockets and one traffic signal.
Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP
Moreno Valley
RIV091003
In Western Riverside County in the City of Moreno Valley - Eucalyptus Ave. Widening/Extension:
Construction of a 4th through lane in the eastern direction from Redlands Blvd. to Theodore St &
Extension of Eucalyptus Ave. to Redlands Blvd., with a signalized intersection.
Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP
Moreno Valley
RIV091004
In Western Riverside Co. in the City of Moreno Valley - Cactus Ave Widening: Widen Cactus Ave
from 2 to 4 through lanes (2 in ea dir), from Lassefle St to Nason St. Other improvements include the
installation of a dedicated right turn lane, a 2-way left turn lane, bus turn -outs, landscaping &
sidewalks.
Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP
Palm Springs
RIV110124
In the Coachella Valley in the city of Palm Springs - Ramon Rd. Widening between San Luis Rey Dr &
Landau Blvd: Widening of Ramon Rd. from a 4-Ln arterial to a 6-Ln arterial (3-Lns in ea dir) between
San Luis Rey Dr & Landau Blvd., including the widening/replacement of the Whitewater River Bridge
(Bridge No. 56CO287), including seismic retrofit and scour countermeasures as necessary.
Reprogramming of HBP per 10/29/2012 update.
Palm Springs
RIV990727
In Palm Springs: Widen Indian Canyon Dr from 2 to 6 lanes (3 in each direction), from UPRR
overcrossing to Garnet Ave (HBRR#:56C0025).
Cost decrease per HBP funding update of 10/29/2012
Palm Springs
RIV090405
In the City of Palm Springs: Replace existing 4-lane low water crossir.g cl Vista Chino at Whitewater
River with a new 4-lane bridge - bridge No. 00L0052.
Reprogramming of HBP per 10/29/2012 update & Technical
change, correcting RTP ID to be consistent with the 2012 RTP.
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11 /2014 - 1:10 PM
Page 8 of 36
2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 2 I , _
November 2012
SCAG approval: Dec. 19, 2012
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Palm Springs
RIV031206
On S. Palm Canyon Dr. over Arenas Canyon South Drainage Channel: Replace existing 4 lane low-
water crossing with a new 4-lane bridge, including drainage improvements consisting of levee
channelization (HBRR #: OOL0027).
Cost increase per HBP funding update of 10/29/2012.
Rancho Mirage
RIV110130
In Coachella Valley in Rancho Mirage - Widening of south bound Monterey Ave. from 2 to 3 lanes
from Dinah Shore Dr to Gerald Ford Dr. (Approx. 3,480 L.F.). Other improvements include
installation of curb and gutter, drainage improvements (retention basins), signing and striping, and
traffic signal modification at Ginger Rogers Rd.
Schedule Delay per latest project milestone report from the City of
Rancho Mirage
RCTC
RIV041047
Throughout Riverside County - Grouped Projects for Transportation Enhancement Activities -
Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories - Transportation
Enhancement Activities (Except Rehabilitation and Operation of Historic Transportation Buildings,
structures, or facilities). $398 in toll credits will be utilized for STPL match for cons in FY 2012/2013.
Reprogramming of funds to re-establish the STIP STP-ENHANCE-
RIP TEA funds, per RCTC discretion for utilization of TE reserve
funds prior to June 30, 2013.
TC utilization per Abijit Badge memo dated 12/12/2011.
RCTC
RIV050517
On SR74 in/near Hemet from Calvert Ave to California Ave: curve, median, & pavement widening
(non -capacity) (EA ON3600).
Cost increase and schedule delay per latest cost estimate
RC ; C
RIV070308
At SR91/71 Jct: Replace EB 91 to NB 71 connector w/direct fly -over connector, and reconstruct the
Green River Rd EB on -ramp (EA: OF541) ($1,501/$639/$200 toll credits will be used in PS&E to
match DEMO-SAFETEALU/DEMO-TEA21/STP, respectively. $159 toll credits will be used in R/W to
match DEMO-SAFETEALU.)
Cost increase to include Surface Transportation Program - HR
4818 (idle earmark) for the r/w phase.
RCTC
RIV071250
On SR91/I-15: SR91 - Cons 1 MF Ln (SR71-115)/1 Aux Ln var Iocs (SR241-Pierce) (OC PM 14.43-
stem (2/3/4 Lns main-115 15-meeting
) Y )' pr Ln ( 1891 , CD S 1 toll Ex (tel) ( )' & convert HOV to Tel ea dir 0C-115 1-
const tel med dir connct NB15 to WB91 and EB91 to SB15, 1 tel ea dir SR91 dir connct-Ontario IC
(115 PM 37.56-42.94).
Cost increase /addition of Prop 1 B SLPP Formula Funds per CTC
of Dec. 5-6, 2012.
RC TC
RIV110122
On 1-215 in SW Riverside County from Murrieta Hot Springs Rd to 1-215/1-15 Junction, construct a
third mixed flow lane southbound (widens 1-215/1-15 connector from 2 to 3 lanes).
Technical Change to correctly include the PM miles before and
after construction for signage and restriping through consultation
with Caltrans.
New PM pos miles are based on the agreed project construction
foot print with Caltrans.
RCTC
RIV090902
On Interstate 215, from Blaine St SB off -ramp to 0.3 miles south of Martin Luther King Blvd
Undercrossing(PM 40.2 to PM 42.5), extend the existing SB lane # 4 (lane drop) to 0.3 miles south of
Martin Luther King Blvd undercrossing (EA ON890) ($230 toll credits used to match STPL in cons)
Schedule Advance per current bid advertisement
Riverside County
RIV071259
In Eastern Coachella Valley - Mecca Community Roundabout: Construct a roundabout entry to the
unincorporated Mecca Comm. On Hammond Rd & 4th St btwn 5th & 3rd Streets, consisting of a
single In. traffic circle w/one bypass RT Ln for the SE traffic; mountable median aprons; landscaped
center; S/W & Ped. X-ing; landscape buffer; realignment of Hammond Rd.; and an entry monument.
Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP
Riverside County
RIV071285
In the Southeast Coachella Valley in Eastern Riverside County, just south of the City of Coachella on
Ave. 56 (Airport Blvd) - from Polk St to the west to Orange St. to the east of the R/R X-ing: Replace
existing 2 Ln (1 Ln in ea dir) at grade R/R X-ing with a 2 Ln OC (1 Ln in ea dir - non -capacity) across
the UPRR tracks.
Cost increase and schedule delay
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11 /2014 - 1:10 PM
Page 9 of 36
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 2 `�--
e..,.:i.0.-1-.pm.Gi ...ear
November 2012
SCAG approval: Dec. 19, 2012
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Riverside County
RIV111003
In Western Riverside County in the city of Jurupa Valley - Market Street Bridge Replacement:
Replace the existing two lane (one lane in each direction) Market Street Bridge over the Santa Ana
River, 0.4 miles northwest of SR60 with a four lane (two lanes in each direction) bridge, Bridge No.
56C0024.
Reprogramming of H3P per 10/29l2012 update.
Riverside County
RIV100105
In Western Riverside County - I-15 at Indian Truck Trail IC: Widen Indian Truck Trail from 2 to 4
lanes, including dedicated left -turn lanes to NB and SB on ramp; widening of the SB exit ramp from 1
to 3 lanes; and widening of the NB exit ramp and entry ramp from 1 to 3 lanes plus intersection
improvements at Temescal Cyn Rd.
Technical Change :o Correct RTP IC, per approved 2012 RTP
Number of Projects
23
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of March 11, 2014
3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM Page 10 of 36
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 3 Elm ....
Irvende Cwery koaportnan Cametior
January 2013
FHWA approval: Mar. 13, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
CALTRANS
RIVLSI2
Grouped projects for emergency repair - SHOPP Emergency Response Program: Projects are
consistent w/40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 - Repair damage caused by natural disasters, civil
unrest, or terrorist acts. Applies to damages that do not qualify for fed emergency relief funds or to
damages that qualify for fed emergency relief funds but extend beyond the federally declared disaster
period.
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -Addition of EA
1 C780 to FY 2012/2013
Federal Lands
Highway Divison
RIV130101
REHABILITATE APPROXIMATELY 0.5 MILES OF THE PACIFIC COAST TRAIL - FULLERS RIDGE
TRAIL BETWEEN SEVEN PINES TRAIL AND DEER SPRINGS TRAIL IN MOUNT SAN JACINTO
W
STATE PARK. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITES INCLUDE BRUSHING AND CLEARING,
SWITCHBACKS, ARMORING, ROCK RETAINING WALLS, DRAINAGE LENSES, AND TRAIL
CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION (PART OF MAP-21 BILL).
New Project programmed at the request of State of California -
Natural Resources Agency -Dept of Parks and Recreation
Indio
RIV091208
IN COACHELLA VALLEY IN THE CITY OF INDIO - JACKSON ST TRAFFIC SIGNAL
INTERCONNECT AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALL: INSTALL A NEW TS AT JACKSON ST &
MARKET ST/DILLON AVE., & INSTALL. OF A WIRELESS INTERCONNECT SYSTEM ON
JACKSON ST BTWN AVE. 44 TO THE NO. & AVE. 45 TO THE SO., A DISTANCE OF APROX. 1
MILE. INTERCONNECT SYSTEM INCLUDES 2 EXIST. TS & 1 NEW TS ($38 TOLL CREDITS
USED FOR CMAQ MATCH IN CONS).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years
La Quinta
RIV121202
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA - ON DUNE PALMS RD:
REPLACE 3-LANE LOW WATER CROSSING WITH 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER THE COACHELLA
VALLEY STORMWATER CHANNEL ( WHITEWATER RIVER - BRIDGE NO.00L0070)
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -per 10/29/2012
HBP update
RCTC
RIV071250
On SR91/I-15: SR91 - Cons 1 MF Ln (SR71-115)/1 Aux Ln var Iocs (SR241-Pierce) (OC PM 14.43-
18.91), CD System (2/3/4 Lns main-115), 1 toll Expr Ln (tel) & convert HOV to Tel ea dir (0C-115); I-
15-const tel med dir connct NB15 to WB91 and EB91 to SB15, 1 tel ea dir SR91 dir connct-Ontario
IC (115 PM 37.56-42.94).
Cost increase to include latest cost estimate.
RCTC
RIV090601
REHABILITATION/RENOVATION OF METROLINK TRACK, SIGNALS, COMMUNICATIONS,
STRUCTURES, FACILITIES, SYSTEMS, & ROLLING STOCK. UTILIZATION OF TOLL
DEVELOPMENT CREDITS TO MATCH FTA 5307 & FTA5309(A) IN CONSTRUCTION IS AS
FOLLOWS: $245 IN FY 11 FOR FTA 5307 AND 5309(A); $251 IN FY 12 FOR FTA 5307; $502 IN
FY 13 FOR FTA 5309(A); AND $522 IN FY 14 FOR FTA 5309A.
Description change to clarify that rolling stock
rehabilitation/renovation includes replacement of locomotives with
Tier-4 technology and deprogramming of FTA 5309a FY's 13 and
14.
Original
3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM
Page 11 of 36
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 3
January 2013
RCTC
Ems `.... —
I�cogonn� c
FHWA approval: Mar. 13, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Riverside
RIV071271
IN RIVERSIDE ON STREETER AVENUE: REPLACE EXISTING 4 LANE (2 LNS IN EA DIR) R/R X-
ING WITH A 4 LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) U.C. GRADE SEPARATION ON
STREETER AVE BETWEEN LANTANA ST AND BEATTY DR., AND INSTALL APPROX. 1,000 FT
OF PCC S/W ON EACH SIDE OF STREETER AVENUE WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS.
Cost decrease per latest engineer's estimate.
Riverside
RIV071272
IN RIVERSIDE ON RIVERSIDE AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4-LANE (2 LNS IN EA DIR) R/R/ X-ING
WITH A 4 LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) U.C. G. S. ALONG RIVERSIDE AVE BTWN
MERRILL AVE AND 400FT N/O ELIZABETH ST. ADD IMP INCLUDE INSTALLATION OF APPROX
1,100 FT OF PCC S/W ON EACH SIDE OF RIVERSIDE AVE WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS ($791
TC IN FY09/10 & $151 TC IN FY12/13 USED TO MATCH STPL IN R/W)
Cost increase per latest engineer's estimate
Riverside County
RIV121203
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY - ON AVE 56/AIRPORT DR,
REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER WHITEWATER RIVER .21 MILES E/O
HWY 111 (BRIDGE NO.56C0020).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -per 10/29/2012
HBP update
Riverside County
RIV121204
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE NEWLY INCORPORATED CITY OF EASTVALE - ON
HAMNER AVE OVER SANTA ANA RIVER .5 MILES N/O OF SIXTH STREET, REPLACE 2 LANE
BRIDGE WITH A 6 LANE BRIDGE (BRIDGE NO.56C0446).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -per 10/29/2012
HBP update
Temecula
991206
BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD EXTENSIONS: EXTEND MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS RD (4 LNS)
FROM BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD TO SERAPHINA RD; BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD (4 LNS) FROM
RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD TO MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS RD; & NICHOLAS RD (4 LNS) FROM
BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. TO CALLE GIRASOL
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -Cost increase
Temecula
RIV031215
Frech Valley Pkwy IC/Arterial Phases: Construct 6 Ln IC (Jefferson to Ynez) &ramps, NB/SB aux In,
CD Lns (3 Ins NB&SB) & modify Winchester Rd IC (1-215 PM: 8.43-9.75) (EA:43270).
Cost increase per latest engineer's estimate
Temecula
991202
French Valley Pkwy (FVP) Phase!: Design & Construct FVP 2 through lanes arterial westbound from
1-15 to Jefferson Ave, construct FVP SB exit ramp (1 lane), SB aux lane (from FVP IC to Winchester
Rd IC) & widen Winchester Rd IC SB exit ramp (1 to 3 Ins) (EA: 43270).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years and cost
decrease based on latest estimate
Various Agencies
RIV050201
IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY GROUPED PROJECTS FOR BRIDGE REHABILITATION AND
RECONSTRUCTION - HBP PROGRAM; PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 CATEGORIES -WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR
RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES (NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES). TC UTILIZATION: $649 IN
11/12 FOR CONS; $190 IN 12/13 FOR PE; $18 IN 15/16 FOR RNV; $2 IN 16/17 FOR R/W; $871 IN
16/17 FOR CONS; & $192 IN 17/18
Cost increase per 10/29/2012 HBP funding update.
Number of Projects
Original
14
3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM
As of March 11, 2014
Page 12 of 36
2013 FTIP - RTP Consistency Amendment No. 1/Amendment No. 4
January 2013
RCTC
UM Mew
o..,d c.., t..cuwror cor..war
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Riverside County
RIV110302
ON 1-10 IN THE CITY OF BLYTHE - PROVIDE NEW W/B ON AND W/B OFF RAMPS TO HOBSON
WAY APPROX 1,800' W/O EXISTING RAMPS TO RIVIERA DR/INSPECTION STATION. THE
NEW RAMPS WILL REPLACE EXISTING CONNECTION TO RIVIERA DR.
Description change, Beginning PM Limits change, modeling
changes and reprogramming of funds.
Number of Projects
1
As of March 11, 2014
Original 3/11 /2014 - 1:10 PM Page 13 of 36
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 5 low.......
Intnek Covinv Tialepanooff Commoor
February 2013
SCAG approval: Feb. 21, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Beaumont
RIV050535
ON SR60 BETWEEN JACK RABBIT TR & SR60/1-10 JCT: PH1-CONSTRUCT NEW POTRERO 6
LN OC (3 LNS EACH DIR) W/TEMP CONNECT TO WESTERN KNOLLS (EA34141). PH2: NEW IC
ON/OFF RAMPS. CONSTRUCT WB/EB EXIT &ENTRY RAMPS (2 LNS) & WB/EB LOOP ENTRY
RAMPS (2 LNS) (ENTRY RAMPS INCL HOV LANE), INCL EB/WB AUX LNS AT EXIT RAMPS,
REALIGN WESTERN KNOLLS AVE, AND REMOVE WESTERN KNOLLS AVE CONNECTION TO
SR60 (EA34142).
Cost Increase per latest cost estimate and incorporation of 2011
FTIP A-30 changes (2006 AAA Idle Earmark replaced with STPL)
and transfer of STPL (Formerly TE) from San Timoteo Canyon Bike
and Pedestrian Facilities to SR60/Potrero IC per TAC approval of
Dec 10, 2012
Ca trays
RIV120201
ON SR-60 NEAR BEAUMONT: CONSTRUCT NEW EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND TRUCK
LANES FROM GILMAN SPRINGS RD TO 1.6 MILES WEST OF JACK RABBIT TRAIL (EA:
ON690)AND UPGRADE EXISTING INSIDE AND OUTSIDE SHOULDER IN THE WB DIRECTION
TO STANDARD WIDTHS (5-FT INSIDE SHOULDER AND 10-FT OUTSIDE SHOULDER) (EA:
00180).
Cost decrease to deprogram CMAQ PE funds -CMAQ PE funds
replaced (obligated) with idle earmarks on 12/10/2012.
Cost decrease needed to match Coop -Agreement.
Ca.trans
RIVLS01
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP COLLISION REDUCTION
PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 -
RR/HWY CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC
CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS
AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMNT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING
IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS
Cost Increase - EA ON510 increased and addition of new EA's
OR750 and OR950.
PERRIS
RIV011205
IN PERRIS - WIDEN PERRIS BLVD 2 TO 6 LANES FROM RAMONA EXPRESSWAY TO PERRIS
VALLEY STORM DRAIN - LATERAL'B'(APPROX. 1 MILE), INCLUDING CURB, GUTTER,
SIDEWALK, RAISED MEDIAN, SIGNAL WORK, UTILITY RELOCATIONS, AND MINOR DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS.
Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate and notificaton from
city of Perris regarding defederalizing the project.
{
RCTC
RIV041047
THROUGHOUT RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR TRANSPORTATION
ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126
EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT
ACTIVITIES (EXCEPT REHABILITATION AND OPERATION OF HISTORIC TRANSPORTATION
BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, OR FACILITIES). $236 IN TOLL CREDITS WILL BE UTILIZED TO
MATCH STPL/STP ENHANCE -RIP TEA CONS I
Cost Decrease to reflect the transfer from the San Timoteo Canyon
Bike and Pedestrian facilities to the SR60/Potrero IC per TAC
approval of Dec. 10, 2012.
RCTC
RIV520109
Reconstruct & Upgrade San Jacinto Branch Line for rail passenger service (Riverside to Perris)
(Perris Valley Line) (FY 07 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN) ($330 Toll Credits to match CMAQ in Cons FY
12/13: $865 toll credits to partially match CMAQ ($7,543) in cons FY 13/14; and $6,076 toll credits to
match STP-RIP in Cons FY 12/13).
Project not to utilize toll credits
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
RIV031202
1-10 BYPASS SOUTH: CONSTRUCT TWO LANES OF ROADWAY TO PROVIDE A BY-
PASS/NETWORK FACILITY FOR THE 1-10, APPROX. 1/2 MILE S/O 1-10 BETWEEN THE
EASTERN END OF THE CITY OF BANNING AND APACHE TRAIL IN CABAZON. OTHER
IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEVERAL LOW-WATER CROSSINGS AT
SMITH CREEK AND SAN GORGONIO RIVER (PA&ED).
Description change to refer to the federal earmark for the Ramsey
St. Extension to meet the intent of the legislation for the project
funding.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
RIV060123
IN NORTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY ON CLAY ST FROM APPROX 100"SW OF GENERAL DR
TO APPROX 500" N/O LINARES AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4-LANE (2 LNS IN EACH DIRECTION)
AT GRADE R/R X-ING WITH A 4-LN (2 LNS IN EACH DIRECTION - NON -CAPACITY)
UNDERCROSSING (UPRR).
Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate.
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM
Page 14 of 36
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 5 `i...,--
16:ende00,,,T,....0 ,
February 2013
SCAG approval: Feb. 21, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
RIV071278
IN NORTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY ON MAGNOLIA AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4 LANE (2 LNS
IN EA. DIR) R/R X-ING WITH A 4-LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) O.C. GRADE
SEPARATION ON MAGNOLIA AVE BTWN BUCHANAN AVE. (ON THE EAST) AND LINCOLN
STREET (ON THE WEST).
Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate. Due to Programming
Capacity issues, STPL will be obligated through the EPSP process.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
RIV071285
IN THE SOUTHEAST COACHELLA VALLEY IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, JUST SOUTH OF
THE CITY OF COACHELLA ON AVE. 56 (AIRPORT BLVD) - FROM POLK ST TO THE WEST TO
ORANGE ST. TO THE EAST OF THE R/R X-ING: REPLACE EXISTING 2 LN (1 LN IN EA DIR) AT
GRADE R/R X-ING WITH A 2 LN OC (1 LN IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) ACROSS THE UPRR
TRACKS.
Cost Increase per latest engineer's estimate.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
RIV060124
IN BANNING ON SUNSET AVE AT I-10 FROM S/O RAMSEY ST TO S/O LINCOLN ST: LOWER
SUNSET AVE TO CONSTRUCT NEW 4-LANE UC AT UPRR CROSSING (NON -CAPACITY) AND
RECONSTRUCT THE 1-10 IC RAMPS TO MEET THE NEW STREET GRADE (SAFETEA-LU
CA438, #1261) (EA:33471)
Cost decrease and reprogramming of funds to reflect the latest
TCIF cost estimate and approved funding. Due to CMAQ capacity
issues, RCTC Programmed CMAQ AC in FY 14/15 utilizing LOCAL
AC
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV091211
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE
EXISTING VEHICLES OF THE FLEET: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND
RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET.
Cost Increase per approved 2012/2013 SRTP A-1, and inclusion of
new FTA 5308 grant funds.
TEMECULA
991203
EXTEND OVERLAND DRIVE (4 LANES) FROM COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE TO AVENIDA
ALVARADO/DIAZ ROAD INTERSECTION INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION OF 4 LANE BRIDGE
OVER MURRIETA CREEK
Description Change to include "To Be Implemented in Phases"
Reprogramming of design and construction from FY 2013/2014 to
FY 2014/2015. Add funds in FY 2012/2013 per City of Temecula's
request of 12/20/2012
TEMECULA
RIV060113
CONSTRUCT NEW 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER MURRIETA CREEK (PART OF WESTERN BYPASS
CORRIDOR) INCLUDING APPROACHES, CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, & STORM DRAIN
FACILITIES
Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate.
TEMECULA
RIV62029
AT HWY 79 SO AND LA PAZ ST: ACQUIRE LAND, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT PARK -AND -RIDE
LOT - 157 SPACES.
Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate.
Number of Projects
15
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM
As of March 11, 2014
Page 15 of 36
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 6
March 2013
FHWA approval: Apr. 18. 2013
RCTC
WM Minot
t_
Monde Coveyuwnrmmnn <omrasor
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Beaumont
RIV060115
AT I-10/OAK VALLEY PKWY IC: RECONSTRUCT/WIDEN IC FROM 2 TO 6 THROUGH LANES
FROM APPROX 500' W/O DESERT LAWN DR TO GOLF CLUB DR, WIDEN RAMPS - EB ENTRY 1
TO 2 LANES, EB & WB EXIT 1 TO 4 LANES, WB ENTRY 1 TO 3 LANES, , ADD NEW EB/WB
ENTRY LOOP RAMPS (2 LANES) , ENTRY RAMPS INCLUDE HOV PREFERENTIAL LANE, AND
RAMPS INCLUDE EXTENDED ACCELERATION/DECELERATION LANE (EA: OG280).
Reprogramming of design, R/W and construction, per City of
Beaumont's request of 12/17/2012.
Completion year (model year) remains 2018.
Murrieta
RIV071277
ON 1-215 AT LOS ALAMOS RD IC - INSTALL LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS
TO THE I-215/LOS ALAMOS ROAD INTERCHANGE (SAFETEA-LU 2005 SEC. 1702. HPP #3140).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Yeats.
PALM SPRINGS
RIV071258
IN THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS — TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CENTER: ADVANCE THE
INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL TIMING TO BE UNIFIED CITYWIDE, COORDINATE THE COMM.
EQUIP., BRINGING THEM ALL ONTO THE SAME COMM. PLATFORM FOR THE TRANSMISSION
OF COMPLETE DATA & DISSEMINATION OF INFO. TO THE PUBLIC.
Reprogramming of CMAQ construction funds to FY 2014/2015
(programming capacity issues); CMAQ funding will be obligated in
FY 2012/2013 utilizing the EPSP in place.
Toll Credits will be utilized to satisfy the CMAQ match in
construction.
Perris
RIV091012
IN MID -WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF PERRIS - CASE ROAD/MATTHEWS
RD. (SR-74) AT 1-215 INTERCHANGE: RECONFIGURATION OF THE EXISTING CASE
RD/MATTHEWS RD. (SR-74) AT I-215 IC, IMPROVING THE INTERSECTION OPERATIONS AND
ELIMINATING CROSS TRAFFIC CONFLICTS ON THE SB RAMPS, WIDEN MATTHEWS RD
FROM 2/3 LANES TO 4 LANES FROM CASE RD TO TRUMBLE RD (EA: OP420).
Reprogramming of RAN and Construction, per current schedule.
Completion date changes from 2016 to 2018 but model year
remains 2018.
RCTC
RIV520109
RECONSTRUCT & UPGRADE SAN JACINTO BRANCH LINE FOR RAIL PASSENGER SERVICE
(RIVERSIDE TO PERRIS) (PERRIS VALLEY LINE) (FY 07 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN).
Reprogramming CMAQ Funds and Measure A Match from
FY 2011/2012 to FY 2014/2015.
EPSP will be utilized for obligation in FY 2012/2013.
Riverside County
RIV060124
IN BANNING ON SUNSET AVE AT I-10 FROM S/0 RAMSEY ST TO S/O LINCOLN ST: LOWER
SUNSET AVE TO CONSTRUCT NEW 4-LANE UC AT UPRR CROSSING (NON -CAPACITY) AND
RECONSTRUCT THE 1-10 IC RAMPS TO MEET THE NEW STREET GRADE (SAFETEA-LU
CA438, #1261) (EA:33471)
Reprogramming to eliminate the AC and to allow CMAQ obligation
for construction in FY 12/13, utilizing the Expedited Project
Selection Process.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV050553
IN TEMECULA FOR RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY - CONSTRUCT NEW TEMECULA/MURRIETA
TRANSIT CENTER - LOCATION UNDER STUDY (04, 05, 06, 07, E-2006-091, E-2007-0131, & 2008-
BUSP-0131, SAFETEA-LU).
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years.
Description modified to include correct earmark.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130201
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF RIVERSIDE -
REGIONAL TRANSIT CENTER FOR MASS TRANSIT SERVICE IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE
COUNTY. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED (PA&ED ONLY)
New PA&ED Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years.
Number of Projects
8
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM
As of March 11, 2014
Page 16 of 36
9£ 3o L I• 96ed
Wd 0 V L - b 1-0Z/ 1• I•/£
xspc6o1 luawpuawV dad £60Z
.a;ew!;sa sdeau!6ua;sa;el aad Aelep ainpayos pue aseaaou!;so0
'(2121df1) JNIsS0aaoaNf1
(AlIOVdVO-NON - NOIlO32ila HOV3 NI SNl Z) Nl 4 V H11M JNI-X 2i/21 3ab2iJ 1V
(N01103H10 HOV3 NI SNI Z) 3NV1-4 ONIISIX3 30V1d3H :3AV S32iVN11 0/N „OOS X0HddV Ol
Zia IV213N30 d0 MS..00 L X021ddV WOHJ 1S AVID NO A1Nf100 3aISH3A1H 1S3MH1210N NI
£Z1.090Al2i
/quno0 ap!sian!21
•alepdn;oafoad;sa;el gad Aelep alnpay0S
.a6en6uel (a3'2Vd)
pue 2i31VM MOl 1V2i3AAs anowa o; a6ueyo uo!lduosaa
Zi3A121 OINOOHOO NVS (=INV )133HO HAWS 1V
SONISS02i0 30(11219 d0 N0110f1H1SN00 3Hl 3anioN1 S1N31A13A0HdW1 213H10 'NOZVBVO
NI 11VH13H0VdV aNV ONINNV9 d0 )1/4110 3H1 d0 a1\13 NH31SV3 3H1 N33M138 01.-1 0/S
3111AI Z/L •X0HddV `0 L-I 3H1 HOd 111110Vd NHO/V 13N/SSVd-A8 V 3alAOHd Ol AVMaVOH
d0 S3NV1 OMl 1onaLSNOO :('1X3 '1S A3SWV21 AlH31/4210d) Hinos SSVdAS 01.-1
ZOZ1.£0A121
Aluno0 ap!sJan!y
d121 dI1S PUe VINO 91.
dad �o;;uawpuawe uo!;eoo11e Ie!oueu� 010 gad sa6ueyo 6u!pund
(Z9Ld0:V3) 01 a21 0A3f1N aNV 01 1S a M N33139
S3NV1 Xf1V 1f12i1SN00321 aNV N01103HICI HOV3 NI 3NV1 MOId a3XIW V 10f12i1SN00
:01 a21 0A3f1N Ol a21 1100S 1,1021d A1Nf10O 301S213A1211S3MH1f10S NI SLZ-I NO
60£0L0A121
01021
•alepdn d8H £1.0Z/9Z/£ gad aseaioap lso0
•(LZ00100 :# 21218H) N011VZI13NNVHO 33A31 d0 ONIISISNOO S1N3W3A021d1Al1 3JVNIV210
ONICIMONI '3001218 3NV1-4 M3N V HAM ONISSOHO 2131VM-M01 3NV1 4 ONIISIX3
30V1d321 :13NNVHO 3JVNIV210 H1f10S NOANVO SVN3HV 2i3A0 HC1 NOANVO W1Vd 'S NO
90Z1.£0A121
sbuuds wled
'41./£L Ad u! 010H
Jo; Apedeo do uado o; pepeau am swew;snipe 6u!Punl ld1S
7111.1. Ad u! 6u!pun;
uNe6!lgo/uogeoolle len;oe;o uNeJodaoou! pue uo!sienuo0 OV
(ZO£Z£ V3) 3AV 211d 013AV 213a13 11\102id S3NV1
H`Jf1021I-'_ 4 Ol Z 1/1021d OO 1S NOSVN N301M:011S NOSVN/0921S 1V A311VA ON3H01/1 NI
L L 1.060AIH
Ae11eA ouaJoW
'a;epdn d8H £LOZ/9Z/£ aad spunl Jd 6u!wweJ601d0b
'(090009S'ON 30012 9)133H1S 3NV1 0/M'IW ZZ'0
`HSVM IVOS3W31213A0 30a1218 3NV1 4 V HlIM 30(31219 3NV1 Z'CIH NOANVO IVOS31/131
30V1d321 :ONIN301M/1N3W30V1d3H 3002:19 OH NOANVO IVOS3W31- 3HONIS13 3NV1 NI
£0Z1.L LAIH
eJou!s13 eNel
•eiew!lsa s,JeaupLa lsa;el gad aseaou!;so0
(S3111A110V 1HOdal SISAIVNV
1V1N3WNOHIAN3 AHVNIWIlald "91H0d32i Aaf11S 103f02Hd) ONISSOHO 0VOH11V2i
dSN9 1V N011V21Vd3S 30V210 lond1SNOO -1S A31NINOW ONIISIX3 NO VNOHOO NI
04ZL IMAN
euao0
'ZOOZ 14V aoeld )loo;;ey;;uawys!nbu!lai ww}
Af.,1:; Too-1 o; a;not{ ems wa} pag!sseloai `a6uey0 leo!uyoal
HO 30V210-1V ONIISIX3 3A0W321
`SAVM3Al2i0/SOTS OIddV2111SNO0321 `SIIVM ONINIV13H `SN1VM301S `SNI 3N18 `L L L
AMH/0A1811f1Hd3dV210 Ol ZS 3AV 1A1021d N01103NN00 eldN00321 :IONI S1N3W3A02HdWl
'1S 2131A1lAVM 1V12i1snaN1 0/3 'ld 009 X0HddV Ol Nl AaVHS W021d ' L L L AMH/aA18
1If12id3dwie aNV sNov i13NIINIVW 2121df1 213A0 ONINNVdS 32if11Onais OV3H213A0
NOI1VHVd3S 3aV210 ZS 3AV (A110VdVO-NON) M3N 1Of12i1sNOO — V1I31-10V00 d0 A110 NI
94ZLLOA1H
e,!atoeo^
'II 4d Pue 1 '4d 410q Jo! £4L4£
}o V3 Mau ay; ppe of uo!;duosap loefoad ay; o; abue40 JounAl
"(£41.4£/3414£V3) 0921S
Ol NO1103NNO0 3AV SIIONN N2131S3M 3A01A1321 0NV'3AV SllONN NH31S3M NOI1V321
'SdWVH 11X3 1V SNI Xf1V 8M/83 IONI `(3NV1 AOH I0N1 Shc/VVH AH1N3) (SN1 Z) SdWV2i
AH1N3 d001 93/9M'9 (SNI Z) SdWV21 AH1N3'911X3 93/8M '1SNO0 'SdINVH dd0/NO
01 M3N :ZHd '(£4137£/141.4£V3) SllONN N2131S3M 01103NNO0 d1/131/M (2110 HOV3 SNl
£) OO NI 9 OH3H10d M3N '1SNO0-1Hd :10f O L-1/0921S "9 2i11199VH NOVI NM18 09HS NO
9£SOSOARI
1NOWf1V39
uoseaj elepdn
aµa
p1 loafad
AouaBe
CM `SZ 'ady gemudde OVOS
11NBM)1
AMAIN) 00110,108116.eiffil
£60Z Ilidy
g .ON uogeompoyy angeilsw!ullpV - dad £60Z
MN
31321
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 8 imini....—
April 2013
SCAG approval: Apr. 25, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Riverside County
RIV071288
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE CO. IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY— 66TH AVE GRADE SEPARATION:
CONSTRUCT A TWO-LN (1-LN IN EA DIR) 66TH AVE ELEVATED STRUCTURE OVER THE
UPRR, HAMMOND RD., AND SH-111., FROM WESTERLY OF LINCOLN ST TO JOHNSON ST ON
THE EAST IN THE COMMUNITY OF MECCA. ADD. IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED
TO TIE BACK INTO THE EXISTING ALIGNMENT.
Reprogram funding years to reflect current project schedule
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120826
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - OPERATING ASSISTANCE: FIXED ROUTE AND
DIAL -A -RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA:
HEMET)
Cost decrease per latest revisions to FTA 5311 Regional
Apportionments for Operating Assistance and removing incorrect
funds from SRTP table 4 programmed on this project.
Sunline Transit
Agency
RIV120804
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY — FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A -RIDE
OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 — FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS).
Cost increase per latest revisions to FTA 5311 Regional
Apportionments for Operating Assistance.
Temecula
RIV62031
I-15/SR79 SO. IC: REMOVE SB EXIT RAMP, ADD NEW SB EXIT LOOP RAMP, REALIGN SB EXIT
RAMP (2 LNS) W/AUX LN. WIDEN SB ENTRY 1 TO 3, NB EXIT 1 TO 4, NB ENTRY 1 TO 3 &
RECON SR79S.
Schedule delay is due to scope in RAN acquisition.
Temecula
RIV031215
FRENCH VALLEY PKWY IC/ARTERIAL PHASES: CONSTRUCT 6 LN IC (JEFFERSON TO YNEZ)
& RAMPS, NB/SB AUX LN, CD LNS (3 LNS NB&SB) & MODIFY WINCHESTER RD IC (1-215 PM:
8.43-9.75) (EA:43270)
Fund Source Change per Abhijit Badge direction to SCAG on
2/20/2013
Various Agencies
RIV050201
IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY GROUPED PROJECTS FOR BRIDGE REHABILITATION AND
RECONSTRUCTION - HBP PROGRAM; PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 CATEGORIES - WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR
RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES (NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES). TC UTILIZATION:$190 IN
12/13 FOR PE; $18 IN 15/16 FOR R/W; $2 IN 16/17 FOR R/W; $871 IN 16/17 FOR CONS; & $192
IN 17/18
Cost Decrease per 3/26/2013 HBP Lump Sum Update.
Description change to adjust TC utilization, per HBP funding
changes in FY 11/12.
Number of Projects
15
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of March 11, 2014
3/11 /2014 - 1:10 PM Page 18 of 36
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 9 inn ..... ---
t�.de town Lnmponancr Co- tor
May 2013
FHWA approval: Jun. 27, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Rancho Mirage
RIV110130
IN COACHELLA VALLEY IN RANCHO MIRAGE - WIDENING OF SOUTH BOUND MONTEREY
AVE. FROM 2 TO 3 LANES FROM DINAH SHORE DR TO GERALD FORD DR. (APPROX. 3,480
L.F.). OTHER IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE INSTALLATION OF CURB AND GUTTER, DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS (RETENTION BASINS), SIGNING AND STRIPING, AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATION AT GINGER ROGERS RD.
Cost Increase per latest engineer's estimate
Riverside
RIV071272
IN RIVERSIDE ON RIVERSIDE AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4-LANE (2 LNS iN EA DIR) R/R/ X-ING
WITH A 4 LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) U.C. G. S. ALONG RIVERSIDE AVE BTWN
MERRILL AVE AND 400FT N/O ELIZABETH ST. ADD IMP INCLUDE INSTALLATION OF APPROX
1,100 FT OF PCC S/W ON EACH SIDE OF RIVERSIDE AVE WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS ($791
TC IN FY09/10 & $151 TC IN FY12/13 USED TO MATCH STPL IN R/W)
Cost Increase and Schedule Delay, per Baseline Agreement
Amendment and Financial TCIF allocation approval of 5/7/2013.
Removal of STPL funds in FY 2012/2013 per engineer's latest
estimate for RM/. Removal of TC language in Description due to
removal of STPL in FY 2012/2013
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV130401
THROUGHOUT WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT
RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR
REHABILITATION.
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Yea <.
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV130402
THROUGHOUT EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT
RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR
REHABILITATION.
New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV031218
IN WESTERN RIV CO - NEW MID CO PKWY: CONS 6 THRU LN (3 LNS IN EA DIR) APPROX 16
MI. BTWN 1-215 IN PERRIS EAST TO SR79 IN SAN JACINTO, INC. CONS/RECONS OF APPROX
10 ICs, ADD OF AUX LN REDLANDS-EVANS & EB AUXILIARY LN EVANS-ANTELOPE. 1-215 IMP:
ADD 1 MF LN IN EA DIR NUEVO RD -VAN BUREN BLVD, & 1 AUX LN 1N EA DIR MID CO PKWY-
CAJALCO/RAMONA EXP & FROM MID CO PKWY-NUEVO.
Cost decrease to reflect latest engineer's estimate.
Project fully funded -Construction funding programmed in the
unconstrained years of the 2013 FTIP.
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV031218
IN WESTERN RIV CO - NEW MID CO PKWY: CONS 6 THRU LN (3 LNS IN EA DIR) APPROX 16
MI. BTWN 1-215 IN PERRIS EAST TO SR79 IN SAN JACINTO, INC. CONS/RECONS OF APPROX
10 ICs, ADD OF AUX LN REDLANDS-EVANS & EB AUXILIARY LN EVANS-ANTELOPE. 1-215 IMP:
ADD 1 MF LN IN EA DIR NUEVO RD -VAN BUREN BLVD, & 1 AUX LN IN EA DIR MID CO PKWY-
CAJALCO/RAMONA EXP & FROM MID CO PKWY-NUEVO.
Cost decrease to reflect latest engineer's estimate.
Project fully funded -Construction funding programmed in the
unconstrained years of the 2013 FTIP.
Caltrans
RIV120201
ON SR-60 NEAR BEAUMONT: CONSTRUCT NEW EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND TRUCK
LANES FROM GILMAN SPRINGS RD TO 1.6 MILES WEST OF JACK RABBIT TRAIL (EA:
ON690)AND UPGRADE EXISTING INSIDE AND OUTSIDE SHOULDER IN THE WB DIRECTION
TO STANDARD WIDTHS (5-FT INSIDE SHOULDER AND 10-FT OUTSIDE SHOULDER) (EA:
0Q180).
Minor change to eliminate former EA ON690 and 00180 and
replace them with the new EA ON69U.
Correction to the standard shoulder width - inside shoulder changed
from 5-ft to the Caltrans Std. of 10-ft.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130501
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE
PROGRAM OPERATING ASSISTANCE: COMMUTER LINK SERVICES - ROUTES 212 AND 217
(UZAs: HEM/SAN JAC + TEM/MURR) (FTA 5316, FY'S 11 AND 12)
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle
Riverside Transit
Agency
9 Y
RIV130502
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA: TRAVEL TRAINING PROGRAM (FTA 5317, FY'S
11 AND 12). )
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11 /2014 - 1:10 PM
Page 19 of 36
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 9 inii ......
May 2013 PCovee.saComma
FHWA approval: Jun. 27, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130503
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - JOB ACCESS & REVERSE COMMUTE
PROGRAM: EXTENDED SERVICE PROGRAM (FTA 5316, FY'S 11 AND 12).
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130504
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY
REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOR DIRECTLY OPERATED TRANSPORTATION SERVICES -
SPECIALIZED NON -EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (FTA 5317, FY'S 11
AND 12).
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle
Sunline Transit
Agency
RIV130505
IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - JOB ACCESS & REVERSE
COMMUTE PROJECT: REALIGNMENT AND EXPANSION OF SERVICE FROM INDIO TO
COACHELLA, MECCA AND THE NORTH SHORE, CONNECTING COMMUTERS TO OTHER
EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMUNITIES (FTA 5316 FY'S 11 AND 12).
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
Universal Call for Projects
Sunline Transit
Agency
RIV130506
IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY — JOB ACCESS & REVERSE
COMMUTE AND NEW FREEDOM PROJECT: EXPRESS SERVICE TO THE PASS AREA WITH
SERVICE TO CABAZON, BANNING AND BEAUMONT, MORENO VALLEY, AND RIVERSIDE,
CONNECTING COACHELLA VALLEY COMMUTERS TO WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY (FTA
5316 AND FTA 5317, FY'S 11 AND 12).
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
)
Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle
Sunline Transit
Agency
RIV130507
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - NEW FREEDOM PROJECTS LUMP
SUM FOR NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS (CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93 EXEMPT TABLES
2 AND 3 )(FY 11 & 12 - 5316 & 5317).
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle
Sunline Transit
Agency
RIV130508
IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY FOR CVAG — JOB ACCESS & REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM:
PROVIDE SHUTTLE SERVICE FOR THE HOMELESS SEEKING EMPLOYMENT - SHUTTLE
SERVICE WILL PROVIDE CONNECTIONS TO SUNLINE BUS HUBS AND TO AREAS WHERE
SUNLINE DOES NOT CURRENTLY SERVE. PROGRAM ALSO INCLUDES MOBILITY MANAGER
(FTA 5316, FY'S 11 AND 12).
New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013
Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle
Number of Projects
15
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of March 11, 2014
3/11 /2014 - 1:10 PM Page 20 of 36
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 10 `....
1,..k4,.. Uw,,....to...-
June 2013
SCAG approval: Jun. 25, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Perris
RIV011205
IN PERRIS - WIDEN PERRIS BLVD 2 TO 6 LANES FROM RAMONA EXPRESSWAY TO PERRIS
VALLEY STORM DRAIN - LATERAL'B' (APPROX. 1 MILE), INCLUDING CURB, GUTTER,
SIDEWALK, RAISED MEDIAN, SIGNAL WORK, UTILITY RELOCATIONS, AND MINOR DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS.
Cost Increase per latest engineer's estimate
Riverside County
RIV121204
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF NORCO - ON HAMNER AVE OVER SANTA
ANA RIVER .5 MILES N/O OF SIXTH STREET, REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 6 LANE
BRIDGE (BRIDGE NO.56C0446).
Description change from city jurisdiction of Eastvale to Norco per
Riverside County's request
San Jacinto
RIV120203
IN SAN JACINTO - RAMONA EXP WIDENING PH II: RAMONA EXP WIDENING 2 TO 4 LANES (2
LANES IN EACH DIRECTION) BETWEEN EAGLE RD AND LAKE PARK DR/MAIN ST., INCLUDING
LEFT TURN OR LANDSCAPED STRIPED MEDIAN, 5-8 FT OF PAVED SHOULDER, DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS AND RELOCATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLES.
Reprogramming of WTUMF funds from FY 2013/2014 to FY
2014/2015, per current construction schedule.
CALTRANS
RIVLS01
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP COLLISION REDUCTION
PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 -
W RR/HY CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC
CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS
AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMNT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING
IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS
Cost/funding increase to EA 0M200, per RIVLS01 Grouped Listing
dated May 21, 2013.
Number of Projects
4
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of March 11, 2014
3/11 /2014 - 1:10 PM Page 21 of 36
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 11 am .... —
R (.,, uo,,,,,un,,, Comm or
July 2013
FHWA approval: Sept. 5, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
CALTRANS
RIVLS08
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, SHOULDER IMPROVEMENTS,
PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - MINOR PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE
CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 - RR/HWY CROSSING, SAFER
NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES/OPERATING ASSISTANCE OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PROJECTS
AT INDVL INTERSCTN, (DESCRIPTION CONT. IN COMMENTS)
New funding for SHOPP Minor Program in FY 2013/14.
City of Riverside
RIV130614
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE - CAPITALIZED
PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE (UZA'S RIVERSIDE - SAN BERNARDINO)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
City of Riverside
RIV130615
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE - CAPITAL LEASE OF OFFICE
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (UZA RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130601
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR
PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - OPERATING ASSISTANCE TO
TRANSIT AGENCIES (UZA HEMET)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130602
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR
PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND
RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET.
(UZA'S RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO AND TEMECULA-MURRIETA-MENIFEE)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130603
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED COST OF TIRE LEASE (FTA 5307 -
FY 14) (UZA: TEMECULA-MURRIETA-MENIFEE).
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130604
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - ENHANCEMENT OF THE BUS STOP SYSTEM
SUCH AS: INSTALLATION OF BUS SHELTERS AND BENCHES, KIOSKS, SIGNAGE, AND
LIGHTING TO ENHANCE SECURITY OF THE RIDING PUBLIC, AND ENHANCE ACCESS FOR
PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (UZATEM-MUR-MEN)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130605
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - PURCHASE OF SUPPORT EQUIPMENT ITEMS
INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, BODY SHOP HEATER, SHOP AIR COMPRESSORS,
SCISSORS LIFT, MOBILITY DEVICES FOR TRAINING, PORTABLE CRANE, HAND JACKS (UZA
TEM-MUR-MEN)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130618
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
(UZA RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO AND TEMECULA-MURRIETA-MENIFEE)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years from
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV130619
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - CAPITAL COST OF CONTRACTING (UZA'S
RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO AND TEMECULA-MURRIETA-MENIFEE)
New Project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years f orn
approved 2013/2014 SRTP.
Number of Projects
10
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11 /2014 - 1:10 PM
As of March 11, 2014
Page 22 of 36
9£ }o CZ 96ed
410Z `l l yoaeW }o sV
Wd O V l - 410Z/1.l/£
xslx6ol }uawpuawy &id £ lOZ
9
spafoad }o iagwnN
L4 # IS 611sn }oafad pednaJ
spund Val dIH-3ONVHN3 d1S/1d1S
}o yo;ew leool -1o} s}lpan Vol leuol;lppe Jo; e6ue4O uogduosea
a}ewgse s,aaeuOu3 gad eseenul }so0
1 SNOO Val d18-3ONVHN3 d1S/1d1S HO1VIN
O1 O3Znun 38 111M S1IO3HO 1101 NI 9EZ$ '(S31111I0VA HO 's3HnionaLs 'SONIO11f18
NO11V1HOdSNV211 0I21O1SIH d0 NO11VH3dO (INV NO11V1I1I8VH3211d30X3) S311IA110V
1N3IN3ONVHN3 NO11V1HOdSNVH1- S3I21O031V0 £ 318V1 ONV Z S318V11d1A13X3
9ZVE61HVd HdO 04 HAM 1N31SISNOO 3HV S1O31'0Hd - S3I11A11OV 1N3W3ONVHN3
NO11V1HOdSNVH1 Hod S1031s0 Hd O3dOOHS - A1NO00 3O1SH3A1H inovionoaFl
LbOl40AR1
uolsslwwoo
uol;epodsuall
AlunoO aplsianib
(P)Li. # IS 6ugsi1 }oafad pednaO
uogoy
uolsslww00 £lOZ/Zl./9 gad s;oafad leuol}ippe o} anp aseenul }soO
'NOI1V1I119VH321
HO/ONV ONIOVd2:IOS3H 1N31A13AVd - S31H0O31V0 E 318V1 ONV Z S319V11dW3X3 9Zl'£6
1HVd Hd0 04 H11M 1N31SISNOO 3HY S1031 O8d - NO11V1I118VH321 HO/0NV ONIOVAIrlSal
1N31N3AVd HOd S1O3r0Hd O3df1OHO - A1Nf1OO 3O1SH3A1H NH31SV31f1OHonoHH1
ZObOElAR1
uolsslwwoO
uol}e},odsueil
A}unoO eplsJanid
(p)Li, # IS 6ugsn oafad pednwo
uol;oy
uolsslww00 E lOZ/Z l/9 gad s}oafad leuol;lppe o} anp eseenul }soO
'NOI1V11118VH3H
HO/ONV ONI0VdalS3211N3013AVd - S31210031Y0 6 318V1 ONV Z S318V11d1N3X3 9Zl'£6
121Vd HAO 04 H11M 1N31SISNOO 321V S1O3fOHd - NO11V1I1I8VH3H HO/ONV ONIOVd21f1Sal
1N3W3AYd HOd S1O3fOHd O3df1O210 - A1Nf1OO 3O1SH3A1H NH3193M 1f1OHJf1O2iH1
lO40£11\121
uolssiwwoo
uol;epodsuell
Awnoo episJeAN
I. # IS 6upn }oafad pedncue
£lOZ `8l Ain(' pa3eP
6ui}sil padnaO gOSlAl2i gad `O164b V3 0} aseaaoul 6ulpun}/}soO
(S3NV1 13AVH11VN0I11O0V ON) S39O12:18 ON110O 11SN003H HO S1N3W3AVd MOHHVN
ONIN3OIM - Z 318V11M3X3 9Zl'£6 Hd0 O4/M 1N31SISNOO 3HV S1O31'0HdWy21JOHd
ddOHS - NO11Of181SN003b 0NV NO11V111I8VH3H 300I H8 HOd S1031 OHd O3df1OHO
90S1A18
SNVH11V0
L# IS 6ul;sll }oafad padnaO
171./£ l Ad o} OLEO'. V3 Ppe o} aseenul 6ulpun}/}s00
'(S3NV1 13AVH11VNO111O0V ON) S3JOIHEI ONI1Of1H1SN003H
HO S1N3W3AVd MOHHVN ONIN3OIM '(9Zl .a-S-fI EZ) d3113H AON302131A13 'NOI1V11118VH3H
HO/ONV ONIOVJHOSal 1N31A13AVd - S31H0031V0 Z S318V11dW3X3 9ZVE6
121Vd Hd0 O4 H1IM 1N31SISNOO 3HV S1O3r0Hd INVHDO2Hd NOI1VAH3S3Hd AVM0VOH
ddOHS - NO11V11118VH3H HO/ONV ONI0VdHf1S3211N3W3AVd HOd S1O3fOHd O3d11OHO
ZOS1AIH
SNV2111VO
Z # IS 61111sn }oafad pedna0
'£lOZ `81. AIM' pa}ep 61.1sn pednwo 60S1AIH
Jed '064210 ONV '094H0 `09Zd0 V3 of eseenul 6ulpun}/}s00
SH3A011nd >ionai AON3OH3W3 'S1NWAHdWl
ONI1HOIl 'Vfl 3H13OIS1f1O lO1'OW3O ONINHVW 1NWAd 'SN1OSHalNI 1A0NI 1V
S1OfHd 1VNJIS N1OS831NI 'SIVNOIS NVH1 H3H1O "SISSY ONI1VHAdO/S3OIA3O --NINO
OIddVH1'S1NINAHdWl Half1OHS 'SOH 1A131SAS O1V-O3d-NON H3dVS 'ONISSOHO AMH/HH
- £'8Z S318V11d1A13X3 9Zl'£61HVd 2HO Ob /M 1N31SISNOO 3HY S1O3r0Hd WVHOOHd
NO110 1O3H NOISI11OO ddOHS - S1N30,13AOHdW1 A13dVS HOd S1O3fOHd O3d11OHO
IOSIARJ
SNV2111VO
uosee d a;epdn
el}ll
OI }oafad
Aoue6y
£10Z `ZZ '6ny :ienoudde OVOS
£10Z lsn6my
—mon,M Z6 •oN uoi;eompow angeimuiwpy - dlldl Mg
31321
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 13 `1.....—
September 2013 u.avde cw.h uomwoonona aw
FHWA approval: Nov. 5, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
CALTRANS
RIV110122
ON 1-215 IN SW RIVERSIDE COUNTY FROM MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS RD TO 1-215/1-15
JUNCTION, CONSTRUCT A THIRD MIXED FLOW LANE SOUTHBOUND (WIDENS I-215/1-15
CONNECTOR FROM 2 TO 3 LANES).
Lead Agency change from RCTC to Caltrans - Current Coop
Agreement only includes Eng and R/W. Funding for Construction
will be programmed through an upcoming amendment once the
construction cost can be better estimated and coop. agreement is
executed for the construction phase.
CALTRANS
RIVLS02
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - SHOPP
ROADWAY PRESERVATION PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126
EXEMPT TABLE 2 - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION, EMERGENCY
RELIEF (23 USC 125), WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES
(NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES).
Cost increase to fully fund EA IC370 IN FY 13/14.
Grouped Project Listing SI #7.
CALTRANS
RIVLS12
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY REPAIR - SHOPP EMERGENCY RESPONSE
PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 - REPAIR
DAMAGE CAUSED BY NATURAL DISASTERS, CIVIL UNREST, OR TERRORIST ACTS. APPLIES
TO DAMAGES THAT DO NOT QUALIFY FOR FED EMERGENCY RELIEF FUNDS OR TO
DAMAGES THAT QUALIFY FOR FED EMERGENCY RELIEF FUNDS BUT EXTEND BEYOND THE
FEDERALLY DECLARED DISASTER PERIOD.
Cost increase to add funding for Eas IE490, IE520, IE530, and
1E540 in FY 13/14.
Grouped Project Listing SI #4.
MORENO VALLEY
RIV041045
WIDEN PERRIS BLVD FROM 2 TO 4 LANES FROM IRONWOOD AVE TO MANZANITA AVE
INCLUDING CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, SIGNAL MODS, STREET LIGHTS & MEDIANS
IMPROVEMENTS
New project in quadrennial years in FTIP.
Schedule delay and reprogramming of funds into FY2013/2014.
SLP funds are competitive funds
MORENO VALLEY
RIV080918
IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY - WIDEN REDLANDS BLVD BETWEEN SR-60 AND CACTUS
AVE FROM 2 TO 4 LANES. IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE MEDIANS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS,
CHANNELIZATION, LEFT TURN POCKETS, DEDICATED RIGHT TURN, DRAINAGE,
LANDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS, BIKE LANES, AND TRAILS.
Schedule delay of Implementation by one year
MORENO VALLEY
RIV090909
IN MORENO VALLEY, WIDEN THEODORE ST FROM 2 TO 4 LANES + 2 AUX LANES FROM
EUCALYPTUS AVE TO SR-60 EB RAMPS, INCLUDING MEDIANS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS,
CHANNELIZATION IMPROVEMENTS, LEFT -TURN POCKETS, DEDICATED RIGHT -TURN LANES,
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS, AND BIKE LANES.
Schedule delay and reprogramming of funds into future years
MORENO VALLEY
RIV090910
IN MORENO VALLEY, WIDEN THEODORE ST FROM 2 TO 4 LANES FROM SR-60 WB RAMPS
TO IRONWOOD AVE, INCLUDING TRAFFIC SIGNALS, CHANNELIZATION IMPROVEMENTS,
LEFT -TURN POCKETS, DEDICATED RIGHT -TURN LANES, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS,
LANDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS, AND BIKE LANES.
Schedule delay and reprogramming of funds into future years
MORENO VALLEY
RIV091004
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO. IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY - CACTUS AVE WIDENING:
WIDEN CACTUS AVE FROM 2 TO 4 THROUGH LANES (2 IN EA DIR), FROM LASSELLE ST TO
NASON ST. OTHER IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF A DEDICATED RIGHT
TURN LANE, A 2-WAY LEFT TURN LANE, BUS TURN -OUTS, LANDSCAPING & SIDEWALKS.
Project Completed and actual costs updated.
SLP funds are competitive funds
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM
Page 24 of 36
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 13 immi ....
September 2013 Rnc,�
FHWA approval: Nov. 5, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
MORENO VALLEY
RIV110126
IN MORENO VALLEY ON FREDERICK ST FROM SUNNYMEAD BLVD TO ALESSANDRO BLVD.:
PAVEMENT RESURFACING, ADJUSTMENT OF UTILITY MANHOLE AND VALVE COVERS,
RESETTING SURVEYING MONUMENTS, RECONSTRUCTION OF ACCESS RAMPS TO MEET
ADA REQUIREMENTS, AND INSTALLING PAVEMENT STRIPING AND MARKERS
Deleted Combined Project. Scope already included in RIV130401
LS listing.
MORENO VALLEY
RIV110129
IN MORENO VALLEY ON IRIS AVE. FROM LASSELLE ST TO OLIVER ST: PAVEMENT
RESURFACING, ADJUSTMENT OF UTILITY MANHOLE AND VALVE COVERS, RESETTING
SURVEYING MONUMENTS, RECONSTRUCTION OF ACCESS RAMPS TO MEET ADA
REQUIREMENTS, AND INSTALLING PAVEMENT STRIPING AND MARKERS.
project Completed and actual costs updated.
MORENO VALLEY
RIV130808
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY- GROUPED
PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE
CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES -
PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION.
New project in quadrennial years in 2013 FTIP.
Grouped Projects for the City of Moreno Valley
SI. No. 17( c)
MORENO VALLEY
RIV071242
IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY - RECONSTRUCT INDIAN ST X-ING SR 60 FROM 150' S/O
SUNNYMEAD BLVD., TO HEMLOCK AVE: COMPLETE RECONSTRUCT. OF THE BRIDGE TO
PROVIDE 16'6" CLEARANCE & 4 THROUGH LANES (2 LNS IN EA DIR) & ASSOC. ST. IMP.
WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS (LEFT TURN POCKETS AT SUNNYMEAD AND HEMLOCK
INTERSECT., RIGHT -TURN ONLY SB AT SUNNYMEAD, NEW TS AT HEMLOCK/INDIAN ST., &
INTERCONNECT MOD) (PA&ED)
Cost Change and Schedule Advance
MORENO VALLEY
RIV041052
IN MORENO VALLEY AT SR-60/MORENO BEACH DR IC: MODIFY MORENO BEACH DR IC -
WIDEN OC FROM 2 TO 6 THROUGH LANES, REALIGN/WIDEN RAMPS (WB EXIT 1 TO 2
LANES), ADD NEW WB ENTRY RAMP (2 LANES), AND ADD WB AUX LANE (EA:32303).
Cost Increase to add the drainage improvements for the IC
modifications
MORENO VALLEY
RIV05053
3
AT I-215/CACTUS AVE IC: WIDEN IC FROM 3 TO 6 THRU LNS (EB FROM 2 TO 3 BTWN W/O
BNSF RR TO 1300' E/O VETERANS WAY, ADD 4TH EB LANE FROM NB EXIT RAMP TO E/O
ELSWORTH ST, WIDEN WB FROM 1&2 TO 3 THRU LNS FROM COMMERCE CENTER DR TO
BNSF RR), WIDEN RAMPS 1 TO 2&3 LNS (ENTRY RAMPS INL HOV), EXTEND NB AUX LN
BTWN ALESSANDRO BLVD SOUTH TO CACTUS AVE NB ENTRY LOOP RAMP & ADD
DEDICATED RT-TURN LNS (EA0E760).
Schedule Delay - model year remains 2018.
Anticipated construction completion delay is associated to the
timing to secure the environmental approval.
PVVTA
RIV130616
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR PALO VERDE VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY -
OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FIXED ROUTE AND PARATRANSIT SERVICES (NON-UZA) (FTA
5317 FY 11/12)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for PVVTA -
Operating Assistance.
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11 /2014 - 1:10 PM
Page 25 of 36
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 13 BIM imm.
September 2013 cwmtc
FHWA approval: Nov. 5, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV130803
IN RIVERSIDE CO - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES & RAIL CARS TO
REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET: PROJECTS ARE
CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES -
PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR
MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET (FTA 5310 - FFY 12) ($37 TDC USED TO MATCH FTA 5310
IN CONS).
RCTC's FTA 5310 Call for Projects covering FFY 2011/2012
resulted in the approval of a regional priority list for submittal to
Caltrans for CTC's approval on October 8, 2013 (110% funding
level). The Riverside County Transportation Commission
recommended funding for vehicle replacement projects for
Peppermint Ridge (1, modified raised top), Desert Arc (3, minivan,
medium bus (cng), and large bus) and Friends of Moreno Valley
Senior Center, Inc (1, Medium Bus). Transportation development
credits in the amount of $37,393 are being utilized to satisfy the
required federal match.
SI. No. 58
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV130804
IN RIVERSIDE CO - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES & RAIL CARS TO
REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET: PROJECTS ARE
CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES -
PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR
MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET (FTA 5310 - FFY 12) ($54 TDC USED TO MATCH FTA 5310
IN CONS).
RCTC's FTA 5310 Call for Projects covering FFY 2011/2012
resulted in the approval of a regional priority list for submittal to
Caltrans for CTC's approval on October 8, 2013 (110% funding
level). The Riverside County Transportation Commission
recommended funding for vehicle expansion projects for Angel
View, Inc (2, Larger Bus), Desert Arc (2, larger buses) and Care -A -
Van Transit 2, minivan and modified raised top). Transportation
development credits in the amount of $54,484.00 are being utilized
to satisfy the required federal match.
SI. No. 58
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV130806
IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF OFFICE, SHOP, AND
OPERATING EQUIPMENT FOR EXISTING FACILITIES: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40
CFR PART 93.126, EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PURCHASE OF OFFICE,
SHOP, AND OPERATING EQUIPMENT FOR EXISTING FACILITIES (FTA 5310 - FFY 12) (1 K
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CREDITS USED TO MATCH FTA 5310 IN CONS).
RCTC's FTA 5310 Call for Projects covering FFY 2011/2012
resulted in the approval of a regional priority list for submittal to
Caltrans for CTC's approval on October 8, 2013 (110% funding
level). The Riverside County Transportation Commission
recommended funding for a mobile radio for Peppermint Ridge.
Transportation development credits in the amount of $115.00 are
being utilized to satisfy the required federal match.
SI. No. 54
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130606
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - OPERATING ASSISTANCE (UZA INDIO-
CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 11/12 & FY 12/13)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline -
Operating Assistance.
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130607
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - REHABILITATE 15 BUSES. REHABILITATION
INCLUDES: REPLACING ENGINES, TRANSMISSIONS, SEAT COVERS, DECALS AS WELL AS
PURCHASE OF OTHER BUS EQUIPMENT TO REPAIR/REHABILITATE BUSES. (UZA INDIO-
CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline - Project
No. SL 14-01
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM
Page 26 of 36
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 13
September 2013
RCTC
mum 11... --- -
tmmLeSw . r c ..:. - ..-
FHWA approval: Nov. 5, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130608
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - PURCHASE OF (4) NEW PARATRANSIT
VANS TO REPLACE (4) EXISTING PARATRANSIT VANS. (UZA INDIO-CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM
SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline -Project
No. SL 14-02
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130609
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - TRANSIT STOP ENHANCEMENTS.
ENHANCEMENTS INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO: PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF 38
NEW BUS SHELTERS AND BUS STOP SITE IMPROVEMENTS SAFETY AND SECURITY (UZA
INDIO-CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline - Project
No. SL 14-03
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130610
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - CNG FUELING STATION REPLACEMENT
PHASE I (UZA INDIO-CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline - Project
No. SL 14-06
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130612
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - PURCHASE VARIOUS IT EQUIPMENT,
SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR EXISTING AGENCY SYSTEM NEEDS (UZA INDIO-
CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline -Project
No. SL 14-05
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130613
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - PURCHASE 3 REPLACEMENT AND 2 NEW
EXPANSION CNG SUPPORT VEHICLES AND 6 REPLACEMENT SERVICE VEHICLES. (UZA
INDIO-CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 12/13)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline -Project
No. SL 14-07
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130801
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR SUNLINE - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE (L.ZA INDIO-
CATHEDRAL CITY -PALM SPRINGS) (FTA 5307 FY 11/12)
New project from approved 2013/2014 SRTP for Sunline -
Preventive Maintenance.
FTA 5307 funds from 2012/2013 carryover and CMAQ funds flex
transferred into FTA 5307 funds from CA-95-X076 in the amount of
$77,464
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130805
IN RIVERSIDE CO - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES 8 RAIL CARS TO
REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET: PROJECTS ARE
CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES -
PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR
MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET (FTA 5310 - FFY 12) ($21 TDC USED TO MATCH FTA 5310
IN CONS).
RCTC's FTA 5310 Call for Projects covering FFY 2011/2012
resulted in the approval of a regional priority list for submittal to
Caltrans for CTC's approval on October 8, 2013 (110% funding
level). The Riverside County Transportation Commission
recommended funding for vehicle expansion projects for Sunline
Transit Agency (2, medium buses (cng). Transportation
development credits in the amount of $20,876.00 are being utilized
to satisfy the required federal match.
SI. No. 58
SUNLINE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV130807
IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF OFFICE, SHOP, AND
OPERATING EQUIPMENT FOR EXISTING FACILITIES: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40
CFR PART 93.126, EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PURCHASE OF OFFICE,
SHOP, AND OPERATING EQUIPMENT FOR EXISTING FACILITIES (FTA 5310 - FFY 12) (1 K
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CREDITS USED TO MATCH FTA 5310 IN CONS).
RCTC's FTA 5310 Call for Projects covering FFY 2011/2012
resulted in the approval of a regional priority list for submittal to
Caltrans for CTC's approval on October 8, 2013 (110% funding
level). The Riverside County Transportation Commission
recommended funding for 2 mobile radios for Sunline Transit
Agency. Transportation development credits in the amount of
$230.00 are being utilized to satisfy the required federal match.
SI. No. 54
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM
Page 27 of 36
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 13
September 2013
FHWA approval: Nov. 5, 2013
RCM
NM Mom
u,«,ie Cww fronspo(armor
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Number of Projects 28
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of March 11, 2014
3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM Page 28 of 36
RCTC
2013 FTIP -Administrative Modification No. 14 ma ..... ---
October 2013 Irvin&(wry irwepnrwnon Gomm w
SCAG approval: Oct. 23, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
CALTRANS
RIVLS01
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP COLLISSION REDUCTION
PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 - R/R
/HWY CROSSINGS, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC
CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS
AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING
IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS.
Cost increase to add EA IC740 IN FY 15/16.
Grouped Project Listing SI #2.
Riverside County
Transportation
Commission
RIV130401
THROUGHOUT WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT
RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR
REHABILITATION.
Cost Increase due to additional projects per 9/11/2013 Commissior
Action
Grouped Project Listing SI # 17(d)
Number of Projects
2
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of March 11, 2014
3/11 /2014 - 1:10 PM Page 29 of 36
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 15 `...... —
October 2013 ` Covey roc ommoor
FHWA approval: Dec. 18, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
CALTRANS
RIVLS02
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - SHOPP
ROADWAY PRESERVATION PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126
EXEMPT TABLE 2 - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION, EMERGENCY
RELIEF (23 USC 125), WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES
(NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES).
Cost increase to increase funding for EA: IC370 IN FY 13/14.
Grouped Project Listing SI #7.
CALTRANS
RIVLS12
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR EMERGENCY REPAIR - SHOPP EMERGENCY RESPONSE
PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 - REPAIR
DAMAGE CAUSED BY NATURAL DISASTERS, CIVIL UNREST, OR TERRORIST ACTS. APPLIES
TO DAMAGES THAT DO NOT QUALIFY FOR FED EMERGENCY RELIEF FUNDS OR TO
DAMAGES THAT QUALIFY FOR FED EMERGENCY RELIEF FUNDS BUT EXTEND BEYOND THE
FEDERALLY DECLARED DISASTER PERIOD.
Cost increase to add Ea: IE270 in FY 13/14.
Grouped Project Listing SI #4.
CVAG
RIV131005
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR CVAG: CONSTRUCT NEW 52 MILE BICYCLE,
PEDESTRIAN AND LOW SPEED ELECTRICAL VEHICLE PATH FROM CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
TO CITY OF COACHELLA (PA&ED ONLY).
New project in quadrennial years in FTIP.
Agency funding includes grant from Strategic Growth Council and
Planning Grant from Ca!trans
2012 RTP ID:
3NL04
INDIO
RIV151001
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF INDIO - RECONSTRUCT AND IMPROVE
HIGHWAY 111 FROM 760 FT WEST OF MADISON ST TO RUBIDOUX ST INCLUDING UPDATING
ALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND UPDATE ALL SIDEWALKS, RAMPS AND DRIVEWAYS TO
CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. WIDEN OF HIGHWAY 111 FROM 4 LANES (2 IN EACH DIR) TO 6
LANES (3 IN EACH DIR).
New project in quadrennial years in FTIP.
2012 RTP ID:
3A07031
?ERRIS
RIV131006
IN THE CITY OF PERRIS - 1-215 AT NUEVO RD IC IMP.: WIDENING OF NB AND SB OFF RAMPS
FROM 2 TO 3 LNS, ADD. OF WB RT TURN LN ONTO THE NB 1-215 ON RAMP (WID. FROM 2
TO 3 LANES, 2 EXIST. THRU LNS + 1 NEW RT TURN LN), AND ADDITION OF WB LEFT TURN
LN ONTO SB I-215 ON RAMP (WID. FROM 3 TO 4 LNS - 2 THRU EXIST LNS, 1 LEFT TURN LN +
1 NEW LEFT TURN LANE) & SW INSTALL E/O OC.
New project
2012 RTP ID 3M04WT014
.amber of Projects
5
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM
As of March 11, 2014
Page 30 of 36
9£;o 6£ e6ed
'Aid 01.: -bI.OZ/66/£
xslx601 luawpuawV dlld £60Z
£1.0Z/91/1.l
uo alepdn d8H gad spund;o 6ulwwe160.1de2i pue ase0.1011! lso0
'(9Z00099:#21218H) AAV 13NHV9 Ol 9NISSOH0213A0 2:1Hdfl W02id
`(N01103HId HOV3 NI £) SANV1 9 Ol Z W021d HO NOANVO NVIONI N3OIM :SON121dS 1/11Vd NI
LZL066N21
s6uudg wled
£ lOZ/9l/l l uo alepd� d8H gad spunA;o 6ulwwe�6adab
Z900100 'ON 3901218 - 3901218 3NV1-ti MAN V H1IM HAA1H 2131VM311HM 1V ONIHO V1SIA
NO 9NISSOHO 2131VM MO1 3NVl-4 9N11SIX3 30V1d321 :SONIHdS WIVd dO A110 3H1 NI
904060/U2i
s6uudg wled
WCI.Ad of £l/ZIAd wog spun; uo0;o 6ulwwei6ada2i
'(021 SVNAHV - l3NNVH0 01SI21V8) 6-1 OS SONIHdS WIVd SN00'8 `(2i10 V3 NI Nl l `SN1
Z HN3 dV0 `C1H 01S1HV8-021 SVN321V) Zia VS01/12i3H '1X3 :(S11V1S "NHVd AVE' 31ISAd0
30IAOHd Ol ((dV0-NON) CIH SVNAHV-AM NAO Z11f1DHVl)'2ia VSOINH3H N3aIM:OM dWl
'WO VSOW2i3H'8 AM NANO zunoHV1 AO HANHOO 3S) Wf13Sf1W 31N311V0 Vf19V AH1210A
'0Vd'8 SA21f110f1211S 1NVN312111ddV'8 9NINHYd •HAA "NIV2ia `AVM02i — SONIHdS WIVd NI
Z017060n121
s6uudg wled
£1.0Z/91.4 l uo elepdn d8H _lad spund;o 6ulwwe.i6oRle
-(LZ00100 4 21218H) N011VZI1ANNVHO 3AAA1 d0 9N11SISN00 S1N31N3A021d1Al1 39VNIVHCI
9NI0f110N1 `3901218 3NV1-17MAN V HAM 9NISSOHO H31VM-M01 3NV1 4 91\111SIX3
A0V1d321 :13NNVH0 39VNIV210 Hinos NOANVO SVN3HV HAAO HO NOANVO WIVd 'S NO
90Z6E0Al2i
s6uudg wled
£lOZ/91./l l
uo alepdO d8H gad ,tela0 alnpayog pue spund;o 6ulwwe�6adab
*(I IOZ/010Z Ad NI Mad HOd 03ZI111f1 S1103H011018Z9'LZ$) (Z910099 :#2i8)
SAHOVOHddV 03211f1D32i 11V'8 SH301f10HS /M 3AV SWVOV 013AV N019NIHSVM W02id
N33210 V13R12111W HAM) WOO 390Ri8 •1S vAvno 3NV1 Z MAN 1Of12i1SN00 - V13I212if1W NI
VOZlE0Al2i
elapJnW
£1.0Z/91,4 I. uo alepd0 d8H gad spund Jo 6ulwwel6oideH
'(0900099'ON 390I218)133211S ANV1 0/M'IW ZZ'O
`HSVM 1VOS31A13_ 213A0 3001218 3NV1 V V HAM 3OCIIH8 3NV1 Z'021 NOANV01V0S31/431
£OZl l LARA
woulslA aNel
EIOZ/91./1.L uo elepdfl d8H aad spunA Jo 6ulwwej6ada d
(0L00100'0N 390IH8 - 213/U21 H31VMAlIHM ) l3NNVH0 2131VMW2101S A311VA
V113H0V00 3H1 H3n0 3901H8 3NV1 V H11M 9NISS0210 21A1VM MOl 3NV1-£ 30V1dAH
:C1H SW1Vd 31\1110 NO - ViNino VI AO AllO 3H1 NI A1N1100 AOISH3A121 NHA1SV3 NI
ZOZIZIA121
eluln0 el
£LOZ/9l/l i uo a}epd0 d8H _lad spund;o 6ulwwe�6ada2;
'39012i8 AH1 d0 301S HOV3 NO
X1VM3OIS ld 9 9NIOf110NI `0900100 'ON 3901218) 3001218 ANVI 2iflod V HAM 13NNVH0
HA1VMW2i01S A311VA V113H0V00 AH1 H3A0 9NISSOHO HA1VM MO1 3NV1 OM!
bb 3f1NAAV 9NI1SIX3 30V1dAH :1N31A130V1d321 3901219 bb 3AV - OIONI d0 A110 3H1 NI
ZOZI l l/U21
oipul
£lOZ/9l/l l uo a;epd� d8H gad spund;o 6ulwwe�6wda2i
'S1213nino 0NV 9NI
-X H31VM MO1 AO 1VAOW3H ONV `N0110310Hd dnooS 13NNVH0 `SAVMAAIHO/1VN91S
OldAVH110f1211SN00321 `SN1VM3OIS `SlIVH1/S3NV1 ANTS 3CIMONl S1N3W3n021dW1
213H10 'N01103SHA_LNI S98-HS Ol 11W113H0VdV 0/M 1A-00£ W02id 39O1H8 (H10 VA
NI SNl-£) N1-9 V H1IM (9900100 'ON 390I2i9) 91\11-X 2131VM MO1 Nl-Z V AO 1N3W30V1d3H
:13NNVH0 2i31VM1A12101S V113H0V00 H3A0 09 AAV - V113H0V00 d0 A110 AH1 NI
9Z80114U21
ellayoeo0
£1.0Z/91/1.l
uo a;epd� d8H gad celaO alnpayog pue spunA;o 6ulwwe�6ada2{
'(68 L0099 'ON 3901218)103f0Hd AH1 AO 301S 1SV3 3H19NO1V N1VM301S 0NV NVIO31A1
O3SIVH V AO NOI10f12i1SN00 3H19NICIMONl `(H1f10S 3H101'021 Z3H3d (INV NIHON
AH101 V0V211S3 VIA) 39012i8 3H10/N ld 09Z 013001HO 3H10/S _LA 09£ 'X02IddV W02id
(2i10 VA NI SNl E) SNl 9 Ol ti 1A1021A HC1 WIVd 31V0 AO 9NIN301M:HAAN 2131VM311HM
3H1 H3A0 HCI WIVd 31VO - A311VA V113H3V00 AHl NI A1Nf100 30IS2i3nN NHA1SVA NI
1.1.01.60A121
40 leJpayle0
uoseaelepdn
ally
01 }oafaid
i(oua6y
£LOZ `0£ •aad :lenoidde OVOS
£LOZ Jegwaaaa
.i.MN 9L •oN uogeowpow angeilquluapy - dlld £LOZ
31321
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 16 ow• ...•
Iroersde (wary i.p,00n wn Colmar
December 2013
SCAG approval: Dec. 30, 2013
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
RCTC
RIV130402
THROUGHOUT EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT
RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR
REHABILITATION.
Cost Increase from $4,886 to $5,404 per commission action
Grouped Project Listing SI # 17(d)
RCTC
RIV120101
RCTC COMMUTER RAIL SYSTEMATIC IMP. OF FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT: REHAB OF
RCTC'S COMM. RAIL IN COORDINATION W/METROLINK, INCLUDING REHAB OF TRACK,
SIGNALS, COMMUNICATION, MECHANICAL & LAYOVER FACILITIES, ROLLING STOCK
(LOCOMOTIVES/PASSENGER RAIL CARS), DEV. OF PTC IN SO. CA., AND IMPROVEMENTS,
EXPANSION, AND REHAB OF METROLINK STATION PARKING AND FACILITIES ($2,073.40 TC
FOR 20% MATCH IN FY 13/14)
New project in 2013 FTIP.
RCTC
RIV520111
REGIONAL RIDESHARE - CONTINUING PROGRAM ($309.69 IN TOLL CREDITS UTILIZED TO
MATCH CMAQ IN CONS).
Reprogramming of Con Funds from FY13/14 to FY 12/13 due to
programming capacity issues
Riverside County
RIV111003
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY - MARKET STREET
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT: REPLACE THE EXISTING TWO LANE (ONE LANE IN EACH
DIRECTION) MARKET STREET BRIDGE OVER THE SANTA ANA RIVER, 0.4 MILES
NORTHWEST OF SR60 WITH A FOUR LANE (TWO LANES IN EACH DIRECTION) BRIDGE.
BRIDGE NO. 56C0024
Reprogramming of Funds per HBP Update on 11/15/2013
Riverside County
RIV121203
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY - ON AVE 56/AIRPORT DR,
REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER WHITEWATER RIVER .21 MILES E/O
HWY 111 (BRIDGE NO.5600020).
Reprogramming of Funds per HBP Update on 11/15/2013
Riverside County
RIV121204
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF NORCO - ON HAMNER AVE OVER SANTA
ANA RIVER .5 MILES N/O OF SIXTH STREET, REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 6 LANE
BRIDGE (BRIDGE NO.56C0446).
Reprogramming of Funds per HBP Update o- 1 .. _ 2
Riverside County
RIV050534
AT I-215/NEWPORT RD IC: RECONSTRUCT/WIDEN FROM 4 TO 6 THROUGH LANES BETWEEN
HAUN RD AND ANTELOPE RD, RELOCATE NB AND SB EXIT RAMPS (3 LANES),
RECONFIGURE NB & SB ENTRY RAMPS TO INCLUDE HOV LANE, ADD NEW NB AND SB LOOP
ENTRY RAMPS (2 LANES), INCLUDE EXTENDED RAMP ACCELERATION/DECELERATION
LANES, ADD EXTENDED DEDICATED RIGHT -TURN LANES (EA: 0J440).
Cost decrease based on current engineer's estimate.
STPL funds added to project, per /multi -funding call for projects
scoring.
Completion date change from 2015 to 2016 - model year remains
2018.
STPL obligation will utilize EPSP to obligate funding in FY 2013/14.
Riverside Transit
Agency
RIV120827
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
FOR FY 12-13 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB, TEM/MURR/MEN).
Reprogramming of Con Funds from FY 2012/2013 to FY 2013/2014
per agency and SCAG's request.
TEMECULA
RIV62029
AT HWY 79 SO AND LA PAZ ST: ACQUIRE LAND, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT PARK -AND -RIDE
LOT - 157 SPACES.
Reprogramming of funds to add CMAQ and reduce CITY Funds
due to RCTC's 2013 Call for projects.
Technical change to change SR-79 from State Highway to Local
Highway due to relinquishment of SR-79 to city of Temecula per
CTC action on January 19-20, 2005.
Number of Projects
19
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11 /2014 - 1:10 PM
As of March 11, 2014
Page 32 of 36
RCTC
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 17 `No.
e
February 2014 cownu� c
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
CALTRANS
RIV120201
ON SR-60 NEAR BEAUMONT: CONSTRUCT NEW EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND TRUCK
LANES FROM GILMAN SPRINGS RD TO 1.6 MILES WEST OF JACK RABBIT TRAIL AND
UPGRADE EXISTING INSIDE AND OUTSIDE SHOULDER IN THE WB DIRECTION TO
STANDARD WIDTHS (10-FT INSIDE SHOULDER AND 10-FT OUTSIDE SHOULDER) (EA:
ON69U).
Cost Increase per latest engineer's estimate and incorporation of
new funding sources; and minor change to project description to
clarify the shoulder improvements, distance from Jack Rabbit Tr
based on preliminary design.
Due to funding capacity issues, CMAQ funds are programmed for
construction in FY 2016/17 but obligation of funds will be in FY
2015/16 utilizing the EPSP in place.
CALTRANS
RIVLS01
GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP COLLISSION REDUCTION
PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 - R/R
/HWY CROSSINGS, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC
CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS
AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING
IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS.
Cost increase to add EA 1 E100 IN FY 15/16.
Grouped Project Listing SI #2.
Coachella
RIV151217
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF COACHELLA - WIDENING OF AVENUE 48
FROM 2 TO 6 LANES (1 LN EA DIR TO 3 LNS EA DIR) FROM JACKSON RD TO VAN BUREN ST
INCLUDING TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS, STREET LIGHTING, DRAINAGE
IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING SIDEWALK AND BICYCLE LANES AND LANDSCAPING
New project in 2013 FTIP from RCTC's 2013 Multi -funding Call for
Projects.
RTP ID: 3A07057
Corona
RIV010209
IN THE CITY OF CORONA - CONSTRUCT FOOTHILL PARKWAY WESTERLY EXTENSION 4
LANE ROAD FROM LINCOLN AVE TO PASEO GRANDE (APPROX 2.5 MILES)
Cost increase per engineers estimate
CVAG
RIV131005
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR CVAG: CONSTRUCT NEW 52 MILE BICYCLE,
PEDESTRIAN AND LOW SPEED ELECTRICAL VEHICLE PATH FROM CITY OF PALM SPRINGS
TO CITY OF COACHELLA (PA&ED ONLY).
Scope change to include all phases of work. Total project cost
reduces from $80,000 to $65,041 to include Phase I work only.
Agency Funds includes Strategic Growth Council and Planning
grant from Ca!trans, local CVAG funds and Air Quality Funds from
SCAQMD.
Eastvale
RIV151201
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF EASTVALE - TRAFFIC SYCHRONIZATION
OF SIX TRAFFIC SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ALONG HAMNER AVENUE FROM
SCHLEISMAN ROAD TO EASTVALE GATEWAY
New project in 2013 FTIP from RCTC's 2013 Multi -funding Call for
Projects. CMAQ PM 2.5 benefits consist of .043 kg/day.
RTP ID: 7120006
Lake Elsinore
RIV131127
IN LAKE ELSINORE - INTERSECTION WIDENING AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION -
RIVERSIDE DR/SR74 AT GRAND AVE: WIDEN RIVERSIDE DR/SR74 FROM 3 TO 6 LANES AND
GRAND AVENUE FROM 2 TO 4 LANES AND INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE T-
INTERSECTION OF RIVERSIDE DR/SR74 AT GRAND AVE.
New Project - RTP ID 3AL204 and 2013 FTIP parent project
RIV091007
Lake Elsinore
RIV131127
IN LAKE ELSINORE - INTERSECTION WIDENING AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION -
RIVERSIDE DR/SR74 AT GRAND AVE: WIDEN RIVERSIDE DR/SR74 FROM 3 TO 6 LANES AND
GRAND AVENUE FROM 2 TO 4 LANES AND INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE T-
INTERSECTION OF RIVERSIDE DR/SR74 AT GRAND AVE.
New Project added to the 2013 FTIP at the request of the City of
Lake Elsinore.
According to current schedule the PA&ED phase will start in Oct
2015 but the preliminary work on the project may start sooner. For
this reason, the project is added to the 2013 FTIP.
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
3/11 /2014 - 1:10 PM
Page 33 of 36
9E 10 4£ e6ed
Wd 01; L - 4LOZ/L L/£
xslx-601;uewpuewy dlld £ LOZ
60S11£ :al d121
(ep/6�l gZE• ;o;slsuoo s;gauaq g Z INd OywO s;oafad
Jo;11e0 6ulpun;-i;1nW s,01021 wOJi dad £ lOZ au; w }oafad nnaN
dIHSH30IH
3SV3HONl ONV 30IAH3S AONVHN3 'AON3101dd3 3A0HdW1 `1N3IN3OVNVIN 1331d 3A0HdWl
Ol S11 A3NNH111 V 30 NOI1V- V1SNl - V1H HOd AlN(100 301SH3A1H NH31S3M NI
ZLZL9LAIH
Aoua6y
;isue�l aplslan12{
4000ZLL 01 dill
•/feP/6)I L60 ;o;slsuoo s;gauaq g Z INd pyw0 s;oafad
�o;11e0 6wpun;-I;1nW £LOZ s,0102i wOJ� dlll ELOZ ul;oafad anaN
11Vbl1V1H1S3a3d 311NVHO
a3S0dIN003a AOIM ld ZL ONV AVM3).118 1 SSV10 3aIM ld 9L V 3a11ON1 111M -mi.
1VOOIN-111f1IN 3H1'3Nel NOANVO ONV AAdIN3IN '13IN3H d0 S3I11Nf1ININM 00 3H1 N33138
13NNVH010H1N00 OOOId N33H011VS 3H1 ONO1V 1IVH1 NV82ifl wool/NI-Lim 911W Z-L
V d0 NO11011H1SN00 - 30ISN3A1H AO Almnoo 3H1 Hod AINf100 3aISHAA1H NH31S3M NI
0LZl9LAIH
Aluno0 aplsianlb
ZOLO0a1 :al &LH
•;s!l;oafad L eloAO
wopeau MaN/OHVr penadde wa; dlld ELOZ ul;oafad MaN
(NO0
NI HO1VIN Ol a3Z1111n 4L/EL Ad NI 0199-LLS) SONfId L 310A0 (ZLJLL Ad 9L£S VIA) OHVf
W021d Sf18 3d0H S,NVA-V-HVO HOd S30IAH3S AH3A113a N011V1HOdSNVH13ONVHN3
011N3IN3OVNVIN All1180N-11SNVH1 NVA-V-HVO 210d A1Nf100 301SH3AIH NH31S3M NI
ZOZ04MIH
0102i
ZOL00321 :al d121
;sll;oafoad L aloAO
wopaaJd MaN/02Jt/f panadde wail dlld ELOZ ul;oafoad MaN
(N00 NI HO1VIN Ol (AZnun 4L/£L
Ad NI 0164LS) SONfId L 310A0 (ZL/L L Ad 9L£S VIA) OHVI LAMA sna 3d0H S,NVA-V-HV0
HOd 30NV1SISSV ONI1VH3d0 11SNVH1 NVh-V-HVO HOd A1Nf100 3OISHDAIH NH31S3M NI
LOZ04LAIH
010H
90L001. :al dill
sine), lelumpen° dlld ELOZ ul;oafad MaN
(A1N0 CIAVVd) •OIONI Ol S313ONV
SO1 NM01NMOa WOad HOCIIHH0011VH A110H31N1 O3S0d0Hd HOd SNOI1V001
3MW2i313a Ol Aaf11S A111181SV3d - OVA0 HOd Aiivnoo 301S2l3A1H NH31SV3 NI
ZOOLSLA12i
0,M A
ZLOZ/L/L L og;ai; o; Lied° - pa;aldwoo;oafad
•(Osseo *V3) Oar-l10mas
Ol S1N3W3A0HdW1 A110VdV0 NON) adru0f12i1S 3e0R18 00 Ad1a0IN/N3O1M ONV S3NV1
Z of L SdWVb 11X3 8N aNV 8S 10f1HISN0032f/N3aIM -01 AMdX3 VNOINVH 1V 9LZ-I NO
SLZLLOAIH
S:2i2'3c
4000ZLL 01 dill
Aep/6)l 91.0 ;o;slsuoo s;gauaq g Z INd °dIN� s;oafad
Jo; ilea 6ulpun;-I;InW £ lOZ s.010H u1O-l! dlld £ lOZ ul;°afoad MaN
(A1NO CITRVd) • 11:IVd 1VN011V3H032131V'S SRi213d 3NV1 013f1NSAV Sf11dnvon3
IN02id 11VH1 Sf10N11N00 V HOd -iivaL lonaanov 3H1 d0 S1NAINe3S ONISS1IN
HOd SNVId d013A30 - A311VA ON3HOW d0 A110 3H1 NI A1Nf100 3CIISH3A1H NH31S3M NI
4OZL9LAIH
Aallen ouwoo;
9000ZLL :01 &LH
•Aep/6)1 goy io;slsuoo s;gauaq gZ INd OVwO -s;oafad
Jo; lle0 6uipun4-11IM 1 ELOZ s.010H wa; dlld ELOZ ul;oafad MaN
•133H1S AVO HO 3f1N3AV Sf11dnean3 (INV aHVA31(108
OHCINVSS3IV '3f1N3AV Sf11OV0 3an-om SN011V001 O3S0d0Hd •09 31f1021 31V1S
ONV SL 31V1SH31N1 ONIHOVOHddV S31f10H 1V1H31HV ONO1V SNOIS 30VSS3IN OIINVNAa
33HH111V1SNl -1311VA ON3HOIN d0 A110 3H1 NI A1Nf100 301SHDAI i NH31S3M NI
£OZl9LN2i
Aallen ouaioIN
9000ZLL :al d121
•Aep/6)1 9ZV Io;sisuoo s;geueq g•Z Old °VINO -s;oafad
Jo; ileo 6ulpun;-111MIN ELOZ s.010H uao-g dlld ELOZ ul;oafad MaN
SN01103SH31N1 a3Z11VNOIS S4 ON11SIX3
1V SH3110H1N00 IVNOIS OIddVH1 MAN ONV `SN01103SH31N1 A3)1 9L 1V SV2AINV0 A.100
1W31SAS 3NOSNOV8 0I1d0-H38Id 13NH3H13 NV eNlamom `S11 d0 NO11011H1SN00
❑NV NOIS3O - A311VA ON3HOIN d0 A110 AH1 NI A1Nf100 301SH3A1H NH31S3M NI
ZOZLSLAIH
(alien oualoIN
uoseab a;epdn
al;ll
al;oafad
Aoua6y
����
.EM
ti iOZ tienUgaA
16 •oN;uaulpuauay letwod - dad £60Z
ME
31321
9E 10 SE 96ed
Yld O b l- ti 60Z/ L 1-/E
xspc6014uawpuewV dad E60Z
g000ZLL UI d12I
•(ep/6�l EZO' bo;slsuo0 s;gauaq 9 Z yid GYMs;oafwd
Jo;11eO 6wpury-4In1AI£lOZ 9,01021 wok dad £lOZ ul;0afad nnaN
N1VM3a1S M3N d0 dl 001:Z dO 1V101 V 30010Nl S1N3W3A021dW1
'3AV 3NV1 013AV NIVaV WONd 133211S 30f1N8 d0 3oIS 3N0 NO N1VM3aIS
d0 N011002:11SN00 - 3a1S213A121 d0 A110 3H1 NI AlN000 3aI9213A121 N2131S3M NI
5LN ZI-914\
10 Aln `apislanl i
17000ZLL :al d121
-Aep/6)I ZOZ•;o;slsuoo sweuaq gZ Wd OVWO •s;0afad
Jo;11e0 6ulpu9;-4IO141EIOZ 9,010d wok dad ELOZ ul;oefoad MaN
'3aIS213AR1 NI VINNOd11V0 dO A11S213AINfl aNV N011V1S NNI102113W 3C11 13AIN
'30IS2J3A N NM01NMOa d0 AlIN101A 3H1 NI WV210021d 32:IVHS 3)119 V 1N3W31dWl
01'N011VIS H0V31V N31'S310A018 Ald0d 3alAONd aNV SN011V1S 310A018
Nflod Ol do 11V1SNI - 3aISHAA N d0 A110 3H1 NI Amnon 3aISN3A N NN31S3M NI
60Z144AIN
do Al!0 `apisJanlN
tiOElb£ 41 d121
s;oafad
�o;11e0 6ulpun;-i;IOW EIOZ s,01021 wok dad £lOZ ul;oafad nnaN
'3ARIa ANf18NV8 O11S NVNV1-1009
1A1021d (Nla V3 E 01211a V3 Z) S3NV1 9 01 ti WONd M/N ONIISIX3 NIH11M 30N3AV
V110NOVW d0 ONIN3aIM - 301Sd3Ald d0 A110 3H1 NI AlNf100 3aIS213Ald NN31S3M NI
91.Z1.91.AI21
in 40 `appenlN
17000ZLL -al d121
V/N ale s;l;aueq 9•Z Wd OVWO 's;oafad
J0;11e0 6u1Pun;-1;I11W £lOZ 9010d mil dlld £lOZ w;oafad nnaN
N011V001321 30N3d
aNV ONId1211S `ONIAVd'ONIaV21O 30010Nl S1N3W3A021dW1 3H1'3A1210 11V2:11 ASSVNO
aNIH38 1IV211310A018 I SSV10 N3AIN VNV V1NVS 3H1 d0 N011210d V 10f1211SN00321
aNV NOI1V3d - 3aIS213Ald d0 h110 3H1 NI AlNf100 3aISd3Ald Nd31S3M NI
80Z1.91.A1N
;o 40'aplsianlb
17000UL 4:11 d121
-ssaoad le;uawualnue
6upnp pa;e1901e4 aq Wm s;gauaq gZ 1Wd OVWO 's;oefad
Jo; lle0 6uipun;-4In1A1£lOZ s,010N wall dad £1.0Z ui;oefoad MaN
(A11\10 a3'8Vd) VaHV NM01NMOa 01 N011V1S HN1102113W 301S213A121
3H1 014I103NN00 l6-?:IS 3H1 SSONOV 3901218 310A018/NVIN1S303d V 10f1N1SN00 Ol
ONIN33NION3 ANVNIWIl3Nd - 3aISN3AIN d0 A110 3H1 NI A1N(100 3aISN3AIN NN31S3M NI
90Z191A1N
Jo An `aplsJanib
Y000Z4L al d121
a3 SVd 6uunp paulw�alap aq Wm s;9auaq 9 Z LAW 0VW0 •'s;0afad
�o; Ilea 6ulpun;-!;1nW £lOZ s,010N ww} dlld £LOZ ui;0afad MaN
)121Vd 1Nf10WNIVd 01 )INVd SMONNVN VZNV NV3101A1
VH121VW W021d -11 113>118 I SSV10 N3AIN VNV V1NVS 011N30Vf aV H1Vd ON1511VM
31IW E•17M3N V 10f1N1SN00 - 3aIS2i3A121 d0 A110 3H1 NI A1N000 301SN3AIN N2131S3M NI
LOZl91.AN
jo 40 'aPlsJaNd
9000UL :al d121
•Aep/6)I 99l•;o;sisuoo s;yauaq gZ Wd 0VW0 •s;oefwd
Jo; Ileo 6uipu9;-11I91N E l•OZ 9,010d w0-14 dad £ l0Z ul;oefoad MaN
SN01103S2131NI a3Z11VNOIS 6b ONIlVadfl IS 302131d 01 3AV
V2:N31S Vl WONd 3AV V110NOVW NO S11f1aN00 ONISSIW 11V1SNl aNV 1S NVNVH008 Ol
1S 1SNId WONd 3AV V110NOVW/1S 1371NV1A1 NO S1N3W3A021dW1103NN00d31N1 1VNOIS
011d0-21381d 11V1SN1 - 301S213A121 d0 A110 3H1 NI A1N000 3aISN3AI2:1N2131S3M NI
40Z1.4lAIN
bo Ala `aPlsJanib
171.0Z '8 'uer uo uoisslww00
NI Aq lenaddV s;0afad J0111e0 64lpund-11191A1gad spun; ld1S
-;oafad a3'8Vd m9N
'(A1N0 a3'8Vd) 1S SWVaV 1V SdWVN dd0 aNV NO aNf108 1SV3 30 SNOI1VN110IdN0032:1
dWV21 :3ONVH02131N1 133211S SWVaV 1V 1.6-2:IS - 3aIS2J3AIN d01.110 3H1 NI
ZOZ LE LAN
J0 fil!0 `aplsianlN
i>£00Z4£ QI d121
suol;e�ado;o s�ea�( aa�y;;sag ay; �o; a0ue;slsse
pue sasnq Mau yl sapnoul aolnas do;g paw
l aseyd •Ae146)1 6£Z';o;slsuoo s;yauaq 9'Z Old OVWO •s;0afwd
J0311e0 6ulpun;-4I91A1£lOZ 9,010N wall dad ul;0afoad MaN
'301/ N3S d0 SNV3A 3321H11S211d 3H1210d 30NV1SISSV ONI1V2=13d0 aNV ad Oti) S3Sf18
M3N til d0 3SVH0Nfld S3af1l0Nl SIH1 'N311.11V VIN311VO 3H1 aNV ,ion N33M138
38 111M 30IAN3S •(dOalNN00 VN02:100/3aISN3AIN) S3f1N3AV VIIONOVW aNV AlISN3AINl
ON01V Sa01N3d 31f1WW00 71V3d AVON33M ONINna V3NV 301AN3S l 31flON ONOIV
301A2713S d01S-a311W11 d0 N011V1N3W31dWl - Vld NOd A1Nf100 301SN3Ald NN31S3M NI
Z5Ald6u;eado
(oua6y
;!suei1 apisJan!N
uoseab a;epdn
9I111
al;oafad
Aoue6y
.�..��v4��i
mall
1710Z fueniga3
L6 •oN;uawpuawV lew.103 - dlld £10Z
Mil
01321
2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 17
0 4.1de (Not kompprnsw CO r
February 2014
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Temecula
RIV140301
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA - CONSTRUCT REMAINING
ONE MILE MISSING LINK IN THE SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK RECREATIONAL MULTI -USE
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE TRAIL FROM YNEZ ROAD TO MURRIETA CREEK MULTI-
PURPOSE TRAIL.
New project in 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years
RTP ID: 7120004
Temecula
RIV031215
FRENCH VALLEY PKWY IC/ARTERIAL PHASES: CONSTRUCT 6 LN IC (JEFFERSON TO YNEZ)
& RAMPS, NB/SB AUX LN, CD LNS (3 LNS NB&SB) & MODIFY WINCHESTER RD IC (1-215 PM:
8.43-9.75) (EA:43270)
Cost increase based on latest engineer's estimate (incorporating
current area construction values).
Temecula
RIV62029
AT HWY 79 SO AND LA PAZ ST: ACQUIRE LAND, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT PARK -AND -RIDE
LOT - 157 SPACES.
Description change to reflect total scope of work. Modeling based
off of 157 parking spaces
Various Agencies
RIV050201
IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY GROUPED PROJECTS FOR BRIDGE REHABILITATION AND
RECONSTRUCTION - HBP PROGRAM; PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 CATEGORIES - WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR
RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES (NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES). TC UTILIZATION: $190 IN
12/13 FOR PE; $18 IN 15/16 FOR R/W; $2 IN 16/17 FOR R/W; $871 IN 16/17 FOR CONS; & $192
IN 17/18
Cost increase and Reprogramming of Funds per HBP Update on
11/15/2013
Wildomar
RIV151214
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR - WIDENING OF GRAND AVE
(CORYDON RD TO DAVID BROWN MIDDLE SCHOOL) TO INCLUDE A CLASS II BIKE LANES.
IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE A TOTAL OF 12,000 LF OF NEW BIKE LANES
New project in 2013 FTIP from RCTC's 2013 Multi -funding Call for
Projects. CMAQ PM 2.5 benefits consist of .014 kg/day.
RTP ID: 7120004
Wildomar
RIV151213
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR - WIDENING OF GRAND AVE
(CLINTON KEITH RD TO DAVID BROWN MIDDLE SCHOOL) TO INCLUDE A CLASS II BIKE LANE
AND MINIMAL WORK TO INCORPORATE CLASS II/III BIKE LANES ON CLINTON KEITH RD
FROM GRAND AVE TO GEORGE AVE. IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE A TOTAL OF 7,300 LF OF
NEW BIKE LANES
New project in 2013 FTIP from RCTC's 2013 Multi -funding Call for
Projects. CMAQ PM 2.5 benefits consist of .026 kg/day.
RTP ID: 7120004
Number of Projects
32
2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of March 11, 2014
3/11/2014 - 1:10 PM Page 36 of 36
AGENDA ITEM 6
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
March 17, 2014
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager
SUBJECT:
Draft Obligation Authority Delivery Plan - Fiscal Year 2013/14
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
At the January 27, 2014 meeting, we requested the TAC's assistance in drafting the FFY
2013/14 Obligation Plan by updating your project schedules in FundTrack. A good majority
of the local agencies responded. Thank You!
The attached draft FFY 2013/14 obligation plan reflects your respective agency responses
and is now our working document to obligate the federal funds programmed in FFY 2013/14.
Due to programming capacity, some of the projects that received federal funds through the
Multi -Funding Call for Projects were programmed in future years (years beyond the projected
delivery), however, the federal funds can be obligated once the project is ready to list though
the Expedited Project Selection Process, which is a tool in place to allow projects ready to be
implemented to move forward prior to the funding programming year. RCTC has enough
obligation authority to fund all the CMAQ projects listed in the draft plan. RCTC would have
to secure a small obligation authority loan from another county to obligate all of the STPL
projects listed in the plan for FY 2013/14.
Please keep in mind that the sooner that you submit your complete packages for
authorization to Caltrans Local Assistance, the better chances your project will be obligated
this fiscal year.
As of 2/27/2014
DRAFT FFY 2013/2014 OBLIGATION PLAN RCTC
NM dads,
tiwnde teumy 5001p0e001 Cow*lion
Agency
FTIP ID
Project Location
Project Scope/Description
RFA Subm. To
Caltrans D-8
CMAQ
STP-L
Funding
Phase
Project
Phase
FTIP FY
2013/14
Comments
Palm Springs
RIV071258
Traffic Management Ctr
TMC
1/8/2014
$1,644,000
Con
ROW
Y
Palm Springs
RIV091205
Farrell Dr RT Ln @ Vista Chino
Intersection Improvements
2/6/2014
$369,000
Con
ROW
Y
Wildomar
RIV130401
Clinton Keith Rd Slurry Seal
Pavement Rehab
3/1/2014
$136,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Riverside County
RIV130402
62nd Street Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
3/20/2014
$605,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Coachella
RIV130402
Grapefruit Blvd. Pavement
Rehabilitation/Reconstruction
Pavement Rehab
4/15/2014
$215,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Riverside County
RIV050534
I-215/Newport Blvd
IC Project
4/15/2014
$14,625,000
Con
ROW
N
May use EPSP
Temecula
RIV130401
Winchester Rd. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
4/15/2014
$646,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Eastva le
RIV130401
Schleisman Ave. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
4/30/2014
$199,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Riverside
RIV130401
Indiana Ave. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
4/30/2014
$1,810,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Riverside County
47520
I-10/Jefferson St IC
IC Improvements
4/30/2014
$14,500,000
Con
ROW Cert
N
May use EPSP
Cathedral City
RIV130402
East Palm Canyon Dr. Rehab
Pavement Rehab
5/1/2014
$337,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Desert Hot Springs
RIV130402
Hacienda Ave & Mission Lakes Blvd. Surface
Rehab
Pavement Rehab
5/1/2014
$182,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Riverside County
RIV130401
Rancho California Rd. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
5/28/2014
$2,634,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Moreno Valley
RIV080904
SR60/Theodore St IC
PA&ED
5/29/2014
$964,600
Eng
Pre PA&ED
Y
Palm Desert
RIV071243
Free rt- Fred Waring/111
Reconfigure Right Turn
6/1/2014
$531,000
Con
ROW
Y
Palm Springs
RIV130402
Ramon Rd. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
6/1/2014
$396,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Moreno Valley
RIV151204
Various Locations
Aqueduct Trail Missing Segments
6/30/2014
$340,000
Eng
Pre PA&ED
N
In Amendment #17 May use
EPSP
Riverside
RIV131202
Adams St at 91 IC
PA&ED
6/30/2014
$935,000
Eng
PA&ED
N
In Amendment #17 May use
EPSP
Riverside
RIV151206
SR 91 Lime to Mulberry
Pedestrian Bridge
6/30/2014
$638,000
Eng
Pre PA&ED
N
In Amendment #17 May use
EPSP
Beaumont
RIV050535
SR60/Potrero Blvd. Interchange Ph. I
IC Project
7/1/2014
$8,929,000
Con
ROW
Y
La Quinta
RIV130402
Washington St. Improvements
Pavement Rehab
7/1/2014
$250,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Lake Elsinore
RIV130401
Gunnerson St. Pavement Rehabilitation
Pavement Rehab
7/1/2014
$286,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Murrieta
RIV130401
Jefferson Ave. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
7/1/2014
$593,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Rancho Mirage
RIV110130
Monterey Ave. SB Widening - Dinah Shore to
Widening Road and Improvements
7/1/2014
850,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
neving some issues on
Environmental with Caltrans
HQ. If resolved soon, RFA for
construction will be submitted
by beginning to July to make FY
13/14
RTA
RIV151211
Magnolia and University Ave's
Limited Stop Service
7/1/2014
$9,212,000
Con
PA&ED
N
Amendment 17, date for
transferred to FTA - EPSP
RTA
RIV151212
Various locations
ITS Fleet service management system
7/1/2014
$4,125,000
Con
PA&ED
N
Amendment 17, date for
transferred to FTA - EPSP
Temecula
RIV62029
Park and Ride Facility
Park and Ride Facility
7/1/2014
$1,301,000
Con
PS&E
Y
May use EPSP
Palm Desert
RIV130402
Portola Ave. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
7/3/2014
$336,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Pending Obligation
Anticipated Obligations - FY 2013/14
Current OA Balance (as of 12/31/2013)
OA Balance at 9/30/2014
$18,160,000
$50,982,842
$32,822,842
$49,428,000
$49.130,182
-$297,818
1
AGENDA ITEM 7
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
March 17, 2014
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director
SUBJECT:
2014 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Update
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
On December 11, 2013, staff submitted the Riverside County 2014 STIP - Regional
Transportation Improvement Program to the California Transportation Commission. The
submittal included two carryover state highway projects from the 2012 STIP, two new state
highway project improvements, the B Canyon Wildlife Crossing, the CVLink, and funding
increase for the Project Programming and Monitoring, fully programming Riverside County's
apportionment of $69.7 M. The attached summary reflects the California Transportation
Commission (CTC) staff recommendations for RCTC projects, totaling $66.6 M in new
programming. The $3.1 M difference is the elimination of the TE reserve previously
programmed for FY 16/17.
The STIP adoption by the California Transportation Commission is scheduled for March 20,
2014 in the City of Santa Ana. Staff has requested SCAG to allow an early submittal of the
next Administrative Modification (No. 18) on April 1, to incorporate the new funding from the
2014 STIP into the 2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP).
Attachments: 2014 STIP Staff Recommendations — Riverside County Share
2014 STIP STAFF RECOMMENDATION - COUNTY SHARE
Does Not Include ITIP Interregional Share Funding (See Separate Listing)
($1,000's)
Riverside
_ Project Totals by Fiscal Year
Project Totals by Component
Agency
Rte
PPNo;Project
Ext
Del.
' Voted
Total; Prior; 14-15I 15-16
16-17
17-18
18-19
R/W
Const
E & P
PS&E
RAN Sup
con sup
STIP Projects at
Fund
Estimate (August 2013)
4 1,
RCTC
loc
77J
1Rt 91 Improvement (design-build)(08S-58)(ext 6-12)
Jul-13
1Mar-13
2,000 2,000; 0; 0
0
0
0
0
2,000
0
0
0
0
RCTC
9803
Planning, programming, and monitoring
; May-13
664.. 664; 0 0
0
0
0
0
664
0
0
0
0
Caltrans
15
21K
;French Valley Parkway interchange
31,545;1 01 0; 31,545
0
0
0
0
14,245
0
0
0
17,300
Riverside Co.
loc
53A
iRt 10, Jefferson St I/C, widen OC (construction)
19,51011 01 01 19,510
0
0
0
0
19,510
0
0
0
0
RCTC
9803;Planning,programming,
and monitoring_
2,65511 664t 664` 664
663
0
0
0
2,655
0
0
0
0
RCTC
rail
1114
Penis Valley Line, commuter rail extnsn (08S-35)(ext 6-11)
Feb-13
Dec-12
52,978 i1 52,9781 01 0
0
0
0
0
52,978
0
0
0
0
RCTC
res
1112
ITE reserve
4,70011 1,6001 011 0
3,100
0
0
0
4,700
0
0
0
0
II
Total Programmed
or Voted since July 1, 2012
114,05211
PROPOSED 2014 PROGRAMMING
I
11 `
I
I.i ]
Highway Project
Proposals: 1
"
Riverside Co.
loc
53A
!Rt 10, Jefferson St I/C, widen OC (construction)
-19,510 0 0-19,510
0
0
0
0
-19,510
0
0
0
0
Riverside Co.
loc
53A
IRt 10, Jefferson St 1/C, widen OC (constriction)
1
33,3101; 0; 33,310! 0
0
0
0
0
33,310
0
0
0
0
Caltrans
15
21K
!French Valley Parkway interchange
F
-31,545:: 0 i 01-31,545
0
0
0
0
-14,245
0
0
0
-17,300
Caltrans
15
21K
;French Valley Parkway interchange
41,545;; 0; 0! 5,000
0
36,545
0
5,000
19,245
0
0
0
17,300
Caltrans
60
46J
;Truck Climbing/Descending Ln w/shoulders (SHOPP)
NEW
32,1051i 01 7,550; 24,555
0
0
0
200
18,755
0
7,000
350
5,800
Caltrans
91
71E
jB Canyon Wildlife Crossing Corridor
NEW
1,48011 01 1,300; 180
0
0
0
80
0
100
1,200
100
0
RCTC
loc
108T;Rt215Southbound
Connector (SHOPP)
I NEW
8,9751; 0 0; 0
10
8,965
0
10
8,965
0
0
0
0
RCTC
9803
;Planning, programming, and monitoring
-2,65511 -664I -664I -664
-663
0
0
0
-2,655
0
0
0
0
RCTC
9803
Planning, programming, and monitoring
I
3,99111 664 664; 664
663
668
668
0
3,991
0
0
0
0
1
I
II 1 ;
;Subtotal, Highway Projects
67,69611 01 42,1601-21,320
10
46,178
668
5,290
47,856
100
8,200
450
5,800
Bicycle and Pedestrian
Project
Proposals:
}{ i
CVAG
loc
1019
ICV Link, Palm Springs -Coachella, multiuse path (Ph1)
NEW
2,00011 01 0 0
0
2,000
0
0
2,000
0
0
0
0
RCTC
res
1112
1TE reserve
-4,70011-1,6001 0 0
-3,100
0
0
0
-4,700
0
0
0
0
RCTC
res
1112
;TE reserve
1,6001; 1,6001 01 0
0
0
0
0
1,600
0
0
0
0
I
!,Subtotal Bike & Ped Projects
II 1
-1,10011 0: 0; 0
-3,100
2,000
0
0
-1,100
0
0
0
0
I
Total Proposed 2014 STIP Programming
1
66,5960; 42,1601-21,320
-3,090
48,178
668
5,290
46,756
100
8,200
450
5,800
i
:.
Cal'rfomia Transportation Commission
Page 56 of 101
2/28/2014
2014 STIP STAFF RECOMMENDATION - COUNTY SHARE
Does Not Include ITIP Interregional Share Funding (See Separate Listing)
($1,000's)
Riverside
I
Project Totals by Fiscal Year
Project Totals by Component
Agency
Rte
PPNO!Project
Ext
Del. I
Voted
Total;
Prior;
1415 15-16 16-17 17-18
18-19
R/W
Const E&Fl PSBE RNVsup
con sup
,
]
Notes:
RTIP adopted 11/13/13
Balance of STIP County Share, Riverside
Total County Share, June 30, 2013
Total Now Programmed or Voted Since July 1, 2012
Unprogrammed Share Balance
Share Balance Advanced or Overdrawn
129,432
114,052
15,380
0
Proposed New Programming
Target
Maximum
66,596
69,696
98 571
Under (Over) Target
3100
California Transportation Commission Page 57 of 101 2/28/2014
AGENDA ITEM 8
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
March 17, 2014
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager
SUBJECT:
Active Transportation Program — First Cycle of ATP Funding and
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The California Transportation Commission will be approving the Active Transportation
Program (ATP) Guidelines on March 20. The ATP Guidelines were developed by the
California Transportation Commission staff with the participation of various workgroups
throughout the state. The approval of the guidelines sets the stage for the Call for Projects,
providing $359.1 M in funding at the statewide level and at the MPO level for non -
infrastructure, infrastructure, Planning Programs, Safe -Route -to -Schools, and 25 percent set -
aside for Disadvantaged Communities. The $359.1 M is an accumulation of three years of
funding from MAP-21 (FY 13/14 — FY 15/16) for two years of programming (FY 2014/15 and
FY 2015/16).
The ATP goals include but are not limited to:
• Increase the proportion of biking and walking trips.
• Increase safety for non -motorized users.
• Increase mobility for non -motorized users.
• Advance the efforts of regional agencies to achieve greenhouse gas reduction goals.
• Enhance public health, including reduction of childhood obesity through the use of
programs including, but not limited to, projects eligible for Safe Routes to School
Program funding.
• Ensure disadvantaged communities fully share in program benefits (25% of funding
available under the state and MPO administration is set aside for disadvantaged
communities).
• Provide a broad spectrum of projects to benefit many types of active transportation
users.
The Guidelines include sequential project selection process, meaning projects that are not
ranked high enough in the statewide competition would have a second opportunity for funding
through the large Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) share. For our region, the
Southern California Association of Governments which is the designated MPO for Southern
California will allow the Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPAs), such as RCTC
to review the applications submitted to the state from Riverside County, adding 10 points for
projects that are consistent with bicycle and pedestrian plans adopted by local and regional
governments within the county where the project is located. RCTC's share of SCAG's
regional $75 M funding is $1.758 Million per year based on geographic equity.
SCAG has provided the 2014 ATP CEO Agreement for Selecting Regional Program. The
agreement is attached for your information and details the goals of the ATP, Project Selection
delegated to Caltrans, SCAG's Role in Project Selection at the MPO level, Planning
Category, and Recommended Regional Program of Projects.
The following are the major milestones for the implementation of the ATP projects:
Call for Projects
Project Applications to Caltrans
Large MPOs submit optional guidelines to Caltrans
CTC approves or rejects MPO guidelines
Staff Recommendations for statewide and rural/small urban ATP
CTC adopts statewide and rural/small urban ATP
Projects not programmed distributed to large MPOs based on
Location
MPO project programming recommendations to the CTC
CTC adopts MPO selected projects
March 21, 2014
May 21, 2014
May 21, 2014
June 25, 2014
Aug. 8, 2014
Aug. 20, 2014
Aug. 20, 2014
Sep. 30, 2014
Nov. 2014
The application can be downloaded from SCAG's website
http://www.scag.ca.gov/programs/Pages/AT.aspx?opentab=7. The website provides
valuable information to the TAC that may enable you to submit a good application for the first
cycle of the Active Transportation Program under the California Transportation Commission.
The link has a good overview of the program and funding availability, useful tips for grant
writing, and weblinks sources to obtain statistical data to complete some of the required
questions.
Additionally, Caltrans District 8 will be holding Active Transportation Program Training on
April 16 from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., at Caltrans District 8 in San Bernardino.
Attachments: 2014 ATP — CEO Agreement for Selecting Regional Program
ATP Guidelines
ATP Application
2014 Active Transportation Program
CEO Agreement for Selecting Regional Program
The intent of this document is to successfully implement MAP 21 and SB 99 active transportation related
programs and funding related to such program. The below outlines the roles, responsibilities and
processes for selecting projects to receive funding from the region's dedicated share of the 2014
California Active Transportation Program (ATP). The region's share is approximately $25 million/year,
which includes 100% of SCAG's federal Transportation Alternative Program apportionments plus
approximately $11 million/year from other federal and state funding programs that were consolidated
by SB 99 into the ATP. This agreement only relates to the 2014 California Active Transportation
Program, which includes three years of funding FY'13-'14, FY'14-'15, and FY'15-'16. The agreement
could be revisited and modified for future rounds of funding.
Background
• The goals of the ATP program are to:
o Increase the proportion of trips accomplished by biking and walking
o Increase the safety and mobility of non -motorized users
o Advance the active transportation efforts of regional agencies to achieve greenhouse gas
reductions goals as established pursuant to SB 375
o Enhance public health, including reduction of childhood obesity through the use of
programs including, but not limited to, projects eligible for Safe Routes to School Program
funding.
o Ensure that disadvantaged communities fully share in the benefits of the program
o Provide a broad spectrum of projects to benefit many types of active transportation users.
• The Active Transportation Program Guidelines describe the policy, standards, criteria and
procedures for the development adoption and management of the Active Transportation Program.
• Per the requirements of SB 99 and Map-21, 40% of the funds for the ATP program must be
distributed by MPOs in urban areas with populations greater than 200,000, with funds distributed to
each MPO based on total MPO population.
• The funds distributed by the MPOs must be programmed and allocated to projects selected through
a competitive process in accordance with the ATP Guidelines.
• Per SB 99 and the guidelines, the following requirements apply specifically to SCAG:
o SCAG must consult with the county transportation commission, the Commission, and
Caltrans in the development of competitive project selection criteria. The criteria should
include consideration of geographic equity, consistent with program objectives
o SCAG must place priority on projects that are consistent with plans adopted by local and
regional governments within the county where the project is located.
o SCAG must obtain concurrence from the county transportation commissions.
• A MPO choosing to use the same project selection criteria and weighting, minimum project size,
match requirement, and definition of disadvantaged communities as used by the California
1
Transportation Commission (CTC) for the statewide competition may defer it project selection to the
CTC.
• 25% of the regional funds must benefit disadvantaged communities.
• A large MPO may make up to 5% of its funding available for active transportation plans in
disadvantaged communities.
• Non -infrastructure projects are eligible for funding; however, there is not a specific set -aside or cap
for this purpose. Non -infrastructure funding is available for start-up or pilot projects that support
education, encouragement, and enforcement activities —not ongoing efforts.
Project Selection -In order to expedite the administrative approval process and accelerate project
implementation, SCAG intends to defer project selection to the California Transportation Commission
and forgo its option to issue a supplemental regional call for projects. This means that the projects will
be scored and ranked by Ca!trans. An evaluation committee will not be required at the county or
regional level within the SCAG region to separately score projects.
• Once projects have been scored and ranked by the California Transportation Commission for the
regional program, SCAG and the county transportation commissions will review and, if
necessary, recommend modifications to the regional program to ensure specific statutory
requirements can be met in a manner that is consistent with the intent of the law and program
guidelines.
• Regional Funding Categories
o Two funding categories will be established for the regional program to support the
review and refinement of the regional program by SCAG and the County Transportation
Commissions. These categories will include: 1.) Planning and 2.) Implementation.
Planning Projects may include the development of active transportation plans in
disadvantaged communities as well as the implementation of non -infrastructure
projects (ex. education, enforcement activities). Implementation Projects may include
the planning, design, and construction of facilities and/or non -infrastructure projects
(ex. education, enforcement activities).
o No less than 95% of the total regional funds will be dedicated to funding
Implementation Projects.
o Up to 5% of the total regional funds will be dedicated to funding Planning Projects,
consistent with the intent of the ATP to fund a broad spectrum of projects and to ensure
disadvantaged communities have resources to develop ATP plans, which will be an
eligibility requirement for future funding cycles. Non -infrastructure projects may also
be funded under this category. If the total request in the Planning Category is less than
5% of the total regional funds, or if applications in this category fail to meet minimum
requirements, then the remaining funds will be allocated to implementation projects.
• County Transportation Commission Role in Project Selection
2
o Prior to scoring by California Transportation Commission, SCAG will provide each county
with a list of implementation project applications submitted within each county.
o The county transportation commissions will review the implementation project lists and
determine which projects "are consistent with plans adopted by local and regional
governments within the county" per the requirements of SB 99. If a project is consistent,
the county will assign up to 10 points to each project. "Plan" shall be defined by each
county transportation commission.
o If a county transportation commission assigns additional points (up to 10, as noted
above) to a project for which they are the lead applicant, an explanation must be
provided to SCAG on how the scoring process resulted in an unbiased evaluation of
projects.
o The Board of each respective county transportation commission will approve the scoring
methodology/guidelines and point assignments, and submit the scores to SCAG for
inclusion in the final ranking of regional projects.
o The Board of each respective county transportation commission will adopt the final
recommended project list as further described in the Recommended Regional Program
of Projects section below.
• SCAG's Role in Project Selection
o Implementation Category
■ Following the release of the preliminary scores by California Transportation
Commission, SCAG will develop for each county a ranked implementation
project list reflecting the base score awarded by California Transportation
Commission plus any additional point assignments (up to 10 pts as noted above)
made by the respective county transportation commission.
■ The ranked list will include a preliminary funding mark, established by the
county's population -based share of no less than 95% of the total regional funds.
The projects from each county above the preliminary funding mark will
constitute the preliminary regional project list.
■ SCAG will analyze the preliminary regional project list and calculate the total
amount of funding to be awarded to disadvantaged communities for
implementation projects across all of the counties.
• If the total is more than 25%, SCAG will consider the preliminary
regional project list as final and include it in the regional program.
• If the total is less than 25%, SCAG will modify the preliminary regional
project list to ensure the 25% mark is achieved, as follows:
3
o Across all counties, the highest scored disadvantaged
communities' project that is below the funding mark will be
added to the regional project list. This project will displace the
lowest scoring project that is above the funding mark and does
not benefit a disadvantaged community, regardless of the
county.
o This process will be repeated until the 25% target is met.
o This process may lead to an outcome where a county receives
less than its population -based share of the funding, but is
necessary to ensure the disadvantaged communities'
requirements for the regional program are met.
o As noted in Recommended Regional Program of Projects section
below, the CEOs, Caltrans and CTC will have the opportunity to
make any final adjustments to the preliminary regional project
list to address any inequities that may result from this process.
o Planning Category
■ SCAG will create a ranked list of planning/non-infrastructure projects reflecting
the California Transportation Commission's selection process and scores, and
delineating those projects that are above and below the funding mark.
■ SCAG will quantify the percentage of funding dedicated to disadvantaged
communities within the Planning Category and determine the amount of
funding that needs to be dedicated to disadvantaged communities to ensure
requirements are met.
■ SCAG will defer to the ranking of California Transportation Commission in the
selection of the planning and non -infrastructure projects, except as follows:
• SCAG may recommend projects be moved up on the list to meet
disadvantaged communities requirements.
• SCAG may recommend projects be moved up on the list to ensure there
is geographic equity in projects recommended for funding in the
Planning Category.
• Recommended Regional Program of Projects
o SCAG will combine the projects selected from the Planning and Implementation
Categories to create a preliminary Regional Program of Projects.
4
o If there are any duplicates in the program resulting from the selection by both SCAG and
a county of a non -infrastructure project, then SCAG will select an alternative project
from the Planning Category.
o The final recommended Regional Program of Projects will be reviewed by the CEOs,
Caltrans and CTC staff to make any final adjustments and achieve consensus prior to
submitting the program to Regional Council and county transportation commissions for
approval and submission to the CTC.
5
Memorandum
To: CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS
From: ANDRE BOUTROS
Executive Director
CTC Meeting: March 20, 2014
Reference No.: 4.12
Action
Subject: ADOPTION OF THE 2014 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES.
RESOLUTION G-14-05
ISSUE:
Senate Bill 99 (Chapter 359, Statutes of 2013) requires the Commission to adopt guidelines for the
development of the Active Transportation Program by March 26, 2014.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Commission adopt the guidelines for the 2014 Active Transportation
Program as proposed in Attachment 1. To ensure consistency with federal and state requirements,
the guidelines recommended for adoption include four revisions made subsequent to the public
hearings and submittal to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee °IBC). These revisions are
summarized in Attachment 2.
BACKGROUND:
On September 26, 2013, the Governor signed legislation creating the Active Transportation Program
(Senate Bill 99, Chapter 359 and Assembly Bill 101, Chapter 354). This legislation requires the
Commission, in consultation with an Active Transportation Program Workgroup, to develop
program guidelines. This statute also requires the Commission to submit draft guidelines to the
JLBC no later than 45 days prior to adopting the initial set of final guidelines.
The goals of the Active Transportation Program are to:
• Increase the proportion of biking and walking trips.
• Increase safety for nonmotorized users.
• Increase mobility for nonmotorized users.
• Advance the efforts of regional agencies to achieve greenhouse gas reduction goals.
• Enhance public health, including the reduction of childhood obesity through the use of projects
eligible for Safe Routes to Schools Program funding.
• Ensure disadvantaged communities fully share in program benefits (25% of program).
• Provide a broad spectrum of projects to benefit many types of active transportation users.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CIIAIR AND COMMISSIONERS
Reference No.:
March 20, 2014
Page 2 of 2
4.12
The proposed guidelines, provided as Attachment 1, represent a general consensus of the workgroup.
Staff facilitated fourteen workgroup sessions since October 2013 at various locations. Additionally,
four subgroups were formed to further discuss specific areas of the guidelines. Each subgroup met
separately twice and reported back to the larger workgroup.
The Commission held two public hearings on the draft guidelines, one in Southern California on
January 22, 2014 and one in Northern California on January 29, 2014. On February 3, 2014, the
Commission submitted the guidelines to the JLBC.
Attachments
1. Proposed 2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines
2. Guideline Revisions Subsequent to Public Hearings and Joint Legislative Budget Committee
Transmittal
3. CTC Resolution G-14-05
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
2014
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
GUIDELINES
3/20/14
CONTENTS
Introduction 1
Background 1
Program Goals 1
Program Schedule 1
Funding 2
Source 2
Distribution 2
Matching Requirements 3
Funding For Active Transportation Plans 4
Reimbursement 4
Eligibility 4
Eligible Applicants 4
Partnering with Implementing Agencies 5
Eligible Projects 5
Minimum Request for Funds 6
Example Projects 6
Project Type Requirements 7
Disadvantaged Communities 7
Safe Routes to School Projects 7
Recreational Trails Projects 8
Technical Assistance Resource Center 8
Project Selection Process 8
Project Application 8
Sequential Project Selection 9
MPO Competitive Project Selection 9
Screening Criteria 10
Scoring Criteria 10
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) i
Project Evaluation Committee 11
Programming 12
Allocations 13
Project Delivery 13
Project Inactivity 14
Project Reporting 14
Roles and Responsibilities 15
California Transportation Commission (Commission) 15
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) 15
Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) with large urbanized areas 16
Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPAs) outside an MPO with Large Urbanized Areas and
an MPO without Large Urbanized Areas 17
Project Applicant 17
Active Transportation Plan 17
Federal Requirements 19
Design Standards 19
Program Evaluation 20
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) ii
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
The Active Transportation Program was created by Senate Bill 99 (Chapter 359, Statutes of 2013) and
Assembly Bill 101 (Chapter 354, Statutes of 2013) to encourage increased use of active modes of
transportation, such as biking and walking.
These guidelines describe the policy, standards, criteria, and procedures for the development, adoption
and management of the Active Transportation Program. The guidelines were developed in consultation
with the Active Transportation Program Workgroup. The workgroup includes representatives from
Ca!trans, other government agencies, and active transportation stakeholder organizations with expertise
in pedestrian and bicycle issues, including Safe Routes to School programs.
The California Transportation Commission (Commission) must hold at least two public hearings prior to
adopting the Active Transportation Program guidelines. The Commission may amend the adopted
guidelines after conducting at least one public hearing. The Commission must make a reasonable effort
to amend the guidelines prior to a call for projects or may extend the deadline for project submission in
order to comply with the amended guidelines.
PROGRAM GOALS
Pursuant to statute, the goals of the Active Transportation Program are to:
• Increase the proportion of trips accomplished by biking and walking.
• Increase the safety and mobility of non -motorized users.
• Advance the active transportation efforts of regional agencies to achieve greenhouse gas
reduction goals as established pursuant to Senate Bill 375 (Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008) and
Senate Bill 391 (Chapter 585, Statutes of 2009),
• Enhance public health, including reduction of childhood obesity through the use of programs
including, but not limited to, projects eligible for Safe Routes to School Program funding.
• Ensure that disadvantaged communities fully share in the benefits of the program.
• Provide a broad spectrum of projects to benefit many types of active transportation users.
PROGRAM SCHEDULE
The guidelines for an initial two-year program of projects must be adopted by March 26, 2014 (within six
months of enactment of the authorizing legislation). No later than 45 days prior to adopting the initial set
of guidelines for the Active Transportation Program, the Commission must submit the draft guidelines to
the Joint Legislative Budget Committee.
Subsequent programs must be adopted not later than April 1 of each odd -numbered year, however, the
Commission may alternatively elect to adopt a program annually.
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) 1
The following schedule lists the major milestones for the development and adoption of the 2014 Active
Transportation Program:
Commission adopts Fund Estimate
Guidelines hearing, South
Guidelines hearing, North
Guidelines submitted to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee
Commission adopts Active Transportation Program Guidelines
Call for projects
Project applications to Caltrans
Large MPOs submit optional guidelines to Caltrans
Commission approves or rejects MPO guidelines
December 11, 2013
January 22, 2014
January 29, 2014
February 3, 2014
March 20, 2014
March 21, 2014
May 21, 2014
May 21, 2014
June 25, 2014
Staff recommendation for statewide and rural/small urban portions of the program August 8, 2014
Commission adopts statewide and rural/small urban portions of the program August 20, 2014
Projects not programmed distributed to large MPOs based on location August 20, 2014
Deadline for MPO project programming recommendations to the Commission September 30, 2014
Commission adopts MPO selected projects November 2014
FUNDING
SOURCE
The Active Transportation Program is funded from various federal and state funds appropriated in the
annual Budget Act. These are:
• 100% of the federal Transportation Alternative Program funds, except for federal Recreation Trail
Program funds appropriated to the Department of Parks and Recreation.
• $21 million of federal Highway Safety Improvement Program funds or other federal funds.
• State Highway Account funds.
In addition to furthering the goals of this program, all Active Transportation Program projects must meet
eligibility requirements specific to at least one of the Active Transportation Program's funding sources.
DISTRIBUTION
State and federal law segregate the Active Transportation Program into multiple, overlapping
components. The Active Transportation Program Fund Estimate must indicate the funds available for
each of the program components. Consistent with these requirements, the Active Transportation Program
funds must be distributed as follows:
1. Forty percent to Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) in urban areas with populations
greater than 200,000.
These funds must be distributed based on total MPO population. The funds programmed and
allocated under this paragraph must be selected through a competitive process by the MPOs in
accordance with these guidelines.
Projects selected by MPOs may be in either large urban, small urban, or rural areas.
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) 2
A minimum of 25% of the funds distributed to each MPO must benefit disadvantaged
communities.
The following statutory requirements apply specifically to the Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG)
• SCAG must consult with county transportation commissions, the Commission, and
Caltrans in the development of competitive project selection criteria.
• The criteria used by SCAG should include consideration of geographic equity, consistent
with program objectives.
• SCAG must place priority on projects that are consistent with plans adopted by local and
regional governments within the county where the project is located.
• SCAG must obtain concurrence from the county transportation commissions.
2. Ten percent to small urban and rural areas with populations of 200,000 or less, with projects
competitively awarded by the Commission to projects in those regions. Federal law segregates
the Transportation Alternative Program into separate small urban and rural competitions based
upon their relative share of the state population. Small Urban areas are those with populations of
5,001 to 200,000. Rural areas are those with populations of 5,000 or less.
A minimum of 25% of the funds in the Small Urban and Rural programs must benefit
disadvantaged communities.
Projects within the boundaries of an MPO with an urban area with a population of greater than
200,000 are not eligible for funding in the Small Urban or Rural programs.
3. Fifty percent to projects competitively awarded by the Commission on a statewide basis.
A minimum of 25% of the funds in the statewide competitive program must benefit disadvantaged
communities.
In the initial program, a minimum of $24 million per year of the statewide competitive program is
available for safe routes to schools projects, with at least $7.2 million for non -infrastructure
grants, including funding for a state technical assistance resource center.
MATCHING REQUIREMENTS
Projects must include at least 11.47% in matching funds except for projects predominantly benefiting a
disadvantaged community, stand-alone non -infrastructure projects and safe routes to schools projects.
The source of the matching funds may be any combination of local, private, state or federal funds.
Matching funds must be expended in the same project phase (permits and environmental studies; plans,
specifications, and estimates; right-of-way capital outlay; support for right-of-way acquisition; construction
capital outlay; and construction engineering) as the Active Transportation Program funding. Matching
funds cannot be expended prior to the Commission allocation of Active Transportation Program funds.
Matching funds must be expended concurrently and proportionally to the Active Transportation Program
funds. Matching funds over and above the required 11.47% may be adjusted before or shortly after
contract award to reflect any substantive change in the bid compared to the estimated cost of the project.
Large MPOs, in administering a competitive selection process, may require a different funding match for
projects selected through their competitive process. Applicants from within a large MPO should be aware
that the match requirements may differ between the MPO and statewide competitive programs.
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) 3
FUNDING FOR ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANS
Funding from the Active Transportation Program may be used to fund the development of bike,
pedestrian, safe routes to schools, or active transportation plans in disadvantaged communities.
The Commission intends to set aside up to 5% of the funds in the statewide competitive program and in
the rural and small urban program for funding active transportation plans in communities predominantly
disadvantaged. A large MPO, in administering its portion of the program, may make up to 5% of its
funding available for active transportation plans in disadvantaged communities within the MPO
boundaries.
The first priority for the funding of active transportation plans will be for cities, counties, county
transportation commissions, regional transportation planning agencies, MPOs, school districts, or transit
districts that have neither a bicycle plan, a pedestrian plan, a safe routes to schools plan, nor an active
transportation plan. The second priority for the funding of active transportation plans will be for cities,
counties, county transportation commissions, regional transportation planning agencies, or MPOs that
have a bicycle plan or a pedestrian plan but not both.
REIMBURSEMENT
The Active Transportation Program is a reimbursement program for costs incurred. Reimbursement is
requested through the invoice process detailed in Chapter 5, Accounting/Invoices, Local Assistance
Procedures Manual. Costs incurred prior to Commission allocation and, for federally funded projects,
Federal Highway Administration project approval (i.e. Authorization to Proceed) are not eligible for
reimbursement.
ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS
The applicant for Active Transportation Program funds assumes responsibility and accountability for the
use and expenditure of program funds. Applicants must be able to comply with all the federal and state
laws, regulations, policies and procedures required to enter into a Local Administering Agency -State
Master Agreement (Master Agreement). Refer to Chapter 4, Agreements, of the Local Assistance
Procedures Manual for guidance and procedures on Master Agreements. The following entities, within the
State of California, are eligible to apply for Active Transportation Program funds:
• Local, Regional or State Agencies- Examples include city, county, MPO*, and Regional
Transportation Planning Agency.
• Caltrans*
• Transit Agencies - Any agency responsible for public transportation that is eligible for funds under
the Federal Transit Administration.
• Natural Resource or Public Land Agencies - Federal, Tribal, State, or local agency responsible for
natural resources or public land administration Examples include:
o State or local park or forest agencies
o State or local fish and game or wildlife agencies
o Department of the Interior Land Management Agencies
o U.S. Forest Service
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) 4
" P u b l i c s c h o o l s o r S c h o o l d i s t r i c t s .
" T r i b a l G o v e r n m e n t s - F e d e r a l l y - r e c o g n i z e d N a t i v e A m e r i c a n T r i b e s .
" P r i v a t e n o n p r o f i t t a x - e x e m p t o r g a n i z a t i o n s m a y a p p l y f o r r e c r e a t i o n a l t r a i l s a n d t r a i l h e a d s , p a r k
p r o j e c t s t h a t f a c i l i t a t e t r a i l l i n k a g e s o r c o n n e c t i v i t y t o n o n m o t o r i z e d c o r r i d o r s , a n d c o n v e r s i o n o f
a b a n d o n e d r a i l r o a d c o r r i d o r s t o t r a i l s . P r o j e c t s m u s t b e n e f i t t h e g e n e r a l p u b l i c , a n d n o t o n l y a
p r i v a t e e n t i t y .
" A n y o t h e r e n t i t y w i t h r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r o v e r s i g h t o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n o r r e c r e a t i o n a l t r a i l s t h a t t h e
C o m m i s s i o n d e t e r m i n e s t o b e e l i g i b l e .
F o r f u n d i n g a w a r d e d t o a t r i b a l g o v e r n m e n t , a f u n d t r a n s f e r t o t h e B u r e a u o f I n d i a n A f f a i r s m a y b e
n e c e s s a r y . A t r i b a l g o v e r n m e n t m a y a l s o p a r t n e r w i t h a n o t h e r e l i g i b l e e n t i t y t o a p p l y i f d e s i r e d .
C a l t r a n s a n d M P O s , e x c e p t f o r M P O s t h a t a r e a l s o r e g i o n a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n n i n g a g e n c i e s , a r e n o t
e l i g i b l e p r o j e c t a p p l i c a n t s f o r t h e f e d e r a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A l t e r n a t i v e P r o g r a m f u n d s a p p r o p r i a t e d t o t h e
A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m . T h e r e f o r e , f u n d i n g a w a r d e d t o p r o j e c t s s u b m i t t e d d i r e c t l y b y C a l t r a n s a n d
M P O s a r e l i m i t e d t o o t h e r A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m f u n d s . C a l t r a n s a n d M P O s m a y p a r t n e r w i t h a n
e l i g i b l e e n t i t y t o e x p a n d f u n d i n g o p p o r t u n i t i e s .
P A R T N E R I N G W I T H I M P L E M E N T I N G A G E N C I E S
E n t i t i e s t h a t a r e u n a b l e t o a p p l y f o r A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m f u n d s o r t h a t a r e u n a b l e t o e n t e r i n t o a
M a s t e r A g r e e m e n t w i t h t h e S t a t e m u s t p a r t n e r w i t h a n e l i g i b l e a p p l i c a n t t h a t c a n i m p l e m e n t t h e p r o j e c t .
E n t i t i e s t h a t a r e u n f a m i l i a r w i t h t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s t o a d m i n i s t e r a F e d e r a l - A i d H i g h w a y P r o g r a m p r o j e c t
m a y p a r t n e r w i t h a n e l i g i b l e a p p l i c a n t t h a t c a n i m p l e m e n t t h e p r o j e c t . I f a n o t h e r e n t i t y a g r e e s t o a s s u m e
r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r t h e o n g o i n g o p e r a t i o n s a n d m a i n t e n a n c e o f t h e f a c i l i t y , d o c u m e n t a t i o n o f t h e a g r e e m e n t
m u s t b e s u b m i t t e d w i t h t h e p r o j e c t a p p l i c a t i o n , a n d a c o p y o f t h e M e m o r a n d u m o f U n d e r s t a n d i n g o r
I n t e r a g e n c y A g r e e m e n t b e t w e e n t h e p a r t i e s m u s t b e s u b m i t t e d w i t h t h e r e q u e s t f o r a l l o c a t i o n .
T h e i m p l e m e n t i n g a g e n c y w i l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e a n d a c c o u n t a b l e f o r t h e u s e a n d e x p e n d i t u r e o f p r o g r a m
f u n d s .
E L I G I B L E P R O J E C T S
A l l p r o j e c t s m u s t b e s e l e c t e d t h r o u g h a c o m p e t i t i v e p r o c e s s a n d m u s t m e e t o n e o r m o r e o f t h e p r o g r a m
g o a l s . B e c a u s e t h e m a j o r i t y o f f u n d s i n t h e A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m a r e f e d e r a l f u n d s , m o s t
p r o j e c t s m u s t b e f e d e r a l - a i d e l i g i b l e :
" I n f r a s t r u c t u r e P r o j e c t s : C a p i t a l i m p r o v e m e n t s t h a t w i l l f u r t h e r t h e g o a l s o f t h i s p r o g r a m . T h i s
t y p i c a l l y i n c l u d e s t h e p l a n n i n g , d e s i g n , a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n o f f a c i l i t i e s .
" N o n - i n f r a s t r u c t u r e P r o j e c t s : E d u c a t i o n , e n c o u r a g e m e n t , e n f o r c e m e n t , a n d p l a n n i n g a c t i v i t i e s t h a t
f u r t h e r t h e g o a l s o f t h i s p r o g r a m . T h e C o m m i s s i o n i n t e n d s t o f o c u s f u n d i n g f o r n o n - i n f r a s t r u c t u r e
p r o j e c t s o n p i l o t a n d s t a r t - u p p r o j e c t s t h a t c a n d e m o n s t r a t e f u n d i n g f o r o n g o i n g e f f o r t s . T h e
A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m f u n d s a r e n o t i n t e n d e d t o f u n d o n g o i n g p r o g r a m o p e r a t i o n s . N o n -
i n f r a s t r u c t u r e p r o j e c t s a r e n o t l i m i t e d t o t h o s e b e n e f i t i n g s c h o o l s t u d e n t s .
I n f r a s t r u c t u r e p r o j e c t s w i t h n o n - i n f r a s t r u c t u r e c o m p o n e n t s .
2 0 1 4 A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m G u i d e l i n e s ( 3 / 2 0 / 1 4 ) 5
MINIMUM REQUEST FOR FUNDS
In order to maximize the effectiveness of program funds and to encourage the aggregation of small
projects into a comprehensive bundle of projects, the minimum request for Active Transportation Program
funds that will be considered is $250,000. This minimum does not apply to non -infrastructure projects,
Safe Routes to Schools projects, and Recreational Trails projects.
MPOs, in administering a competitive selection process, may use a different minimum funding size. Use
of a minimum project size greater than $500,000 must be approved by the Commission prior to an MPO's
call for projects.
EXAMPLE PROJECTS
Below is a list of projects considered generally eligible for Active Transportation Program funding. This list
is not intended to be comprehensive; other types of projects that are not on this list may also be eligible if
they further the goals of the program.
• Development of new bikeways and walkways that improve mobility, access, or safety for non -
motorized users.
• Improvements to existing bikeways and walkways, which improve mobility, access, or safety for
non -motorized users.
o Elimination of hazardous conditions on existing bikeways and walkways.
o Preventative maintenance of bikeways and walkways with the primary goal of extending
the service life of the facility.
• Installation of traffic control devices to improve the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists.
• Safe Routes to School projects that improve the safety of children walking and bicycling to
school, in accordance with Section 1404 of Public Law 109-59.
• Safe routes to transit projects, which will encourage transit by improving biking and walking
routes to mass transportation facilities and school bus stops.
• Secure bicycle parking at employment centers, park and ride lots, rail and transit stations, and
ferry docks and landings for the benefit of the public.
• Bicycle -carrying facilities on public transit, including rail and ferries.
• Establishment or expansion of a bike share program.
• Recreational trails and trailheads, park projects that facilitate trail linkages or connectivity to non -
motorized corridors, and conversion of abandoned railroad corridors to trails.
• Development of a bike, pedestrian, safe routes to schools, or active transportation plan in a
disadvantaged community.
• Education programs to increase bicycling and walking, and other non -infrastructure investments
that demonstrate effectiveness in increasing active transportation, including but not limited to:
o Development and implementation of bike -to -work or walk -to -work school day/month
programs.
o Conducting bicycle and/or pedestrian counts, walkability and/or bikeability assessments
or audits, or pedestrian and/or bicycle safety analysis to inform plans and projects.
o Conducting pedestrian and bicycle safety education programs.
o Development and publishing of community walking and biking maps, including school
route/travel plans.
o Development and implementation of walking school bus or bike train programs.
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) 6
o Components of open streets events directly linked to the promotion of a new
infrastructure project.
o Targeted enforcement activities around high pedestrian and/or bicycle injury and/or
fatality locations (intersections or corridors). These activities cannot be general traffic
enforcement but must be tied to improving pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
o School crossing guard training.
o School bicycle clinics.
o Development and implementation of programs and tools that maximize use of available
and emerging technologies to implement the goals of the Active Transportation Program.
PROJECT TYPE REQUIREMENTS
As discussed in the Funding Distribution section (above), State and Federal law segregate the Active
Transportation Program into multiple, overlapping components. Below is an explanation of the
requirements specific to these components.
DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES
For a project to contribute toward the Disadvantaged Communities funding requirement, the project must
clearly demonstrate a benefit to a community that meets any of the following criteria:
• The median household income is less than 80% of the statewide median based on the most
current census tract level data from the American Community Survey. Data is available at
http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml
• An area identified as among the most disadvantaged 10% in the state according to latest versions
of the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen) scores.
Scores are available at http://oehha.ca.gov/ej/ces11.html.
• At least 75% of public school students in the project area are eligible to receive free or reduced -
price meals under the National School Lunch Program. Data is available at
http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/sd/filessp.asp. Applicants using this measure must indicate how the
project benefits the school students in the project area or, for projects not directly benefiting
school students, explain why this measure is representative of the larger community.
If a project applicant believes a project benefits a disadvantaged community but the project does not meet
the aforementioned criteria, the applicant must submit for consideration a quantitative assessment of why
the community should be considered disadvantaged.
MPOs, in administering a competitive selection process, may use different criteria for determining which
projects benefit Disadvantaged Communities if the criteria are approved by the Commission prior to an
MPO's call for projects.
'SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROJECTS
For a project to contribute toward the Safe Routes to School funding requirement, the project must
directly increase safety and convenience for public school students to walk and/or bike to school. Safe
Routes to Schools infrastructure projects must be located within two miles of a public school or within the
vicinity of a public school bus stop. Other than traffic education and enforcement activities, non -
infrastructure projects do not have a location restriction.
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) 7
I RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROJECTS
For trail projects that are primarily recreational to be eligible for Active Transportation Program funding,
the projects must meet the federal requirements of the Recreational Trails Program as such projects may
not be eligible for funding from other sources (http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/recreational_trails/).
Multi -purpose trails and paths that serve both recreational and transportation purposes are generally
eligible in the Active Transportation Program, so long as they are consistent with one or more goals of the
program.
(TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE RESOURCE CENTER
In 2009, the University of California, San Francisco was awarded federal Safe Routes to School funds to
act as the Technical Assistance Resource Center for the purpose of building and supporting local regional
Safe Routes School non -infrastructure projects.
Typical center roles have included:
• Providing technical assistance and training to help agencies deliver existing and future projects
and to strengthen community involvement in future projects including those in disadvantaged
communities.
• Developing and providing educational materials to local communities by developing a community
awareness kit, creating an enhanced Safe Routes to Schools website, and providing other
educational tools and resources.
• Participating in and assisting with the Safe Routes to Schools Advisory Committee.
• Assisting with program evaluation.
The Commission intends to comply with the statutory requirement to fund a state technical assistance
center by expanding the existing Safe Routes to Schools Technical Assistance Resource Center
interagency agreement to serve all Active Transportation Program non -infrastructure projects.
PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS
PROJECT APPLICATION
Active Transportation Program project applications will be available at:
www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/atp/index.html.
A project application must include the signature of the Chief Executive Officer or other officer authorized
by the applicant's governing board. Where the project is to be implemented by an agency other than the
applicant, documentation of the agreement between the project applicant and implementing agency must
be submitted with the project application. A project application must also include documentation of all
other funds committed to the projects.
Project applications should be addressed or delivered to:
Caltrans
Division of Local Assistance, MS-1
Attention: Chief, Office of Active Transportation and Special Programs
P.O. Box 942874
Sacramento, CA 95814
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) 8
Except for applications submitted through an optional MPO supplemental call for project, the Commission
will consider only projects for which five hard copies and one electronic copy (via cd or portable hard
drive) of a complete application are received by May 21, 2014. By the same date, an additional copy must
also be sent to the Regional Transportation Planning Agency or County Transportation Commission
within which the project is located and to the MPO (a contact list can be found at
www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/offices/orip/).
SEQUENTIAL PROJECT SELECTION
All project applications, except for applications submitted through an optional MPO supplemental call for
projects, must be submitted to Caltrans for consideration in the statewide competition. The Commission
will consider approval of a competitive grant only when it finds that the grant request meets the
requirements of statute and that the project has a commitment of any supplementary funding needed for
a full funding plan.
Projects not selected for programming in the statewide competition must be considered in the large MPO
run competitions or the state run Small Urban or Rural competitions.
A large urban MPO may elect to have a supplemental MPO specific call for projects. The projects
received in this call must be considered along with those not selected through the statewide competition.
MPO COMPETITIVE PROJECT SELECTION
As stated above, projects not selected for programming in the statewide competition must be considered
by the MPOs in administering a competitive selection process.
An MPO choosing to use the same project selection criteria and weighting, minimum project size, match
requirement, and definition of disadvantage communities as used by the Commission for the statewide
competition may defer its project selection to the Commission. An MPO deferring its project selection to
the Commission may not conduct a supplemental call for projects,
An MPO, with Commission approval, may use a different project selection criteria or weighting, minimum
project size, match requirement, or definition of disadvantage communities for its competitive selection
process. Use of a minimum project size of $500,000 or less, or of a different match requirement than in
the statewide competitive program does not require prior Commission approval. An MPO may also elect
to have a supplemental MPO specific call for projects. The projects received in this call must be
considered along with those not selected through the statewide competition.
In administering a competitive selection process, an MPO must use a multidisciplinary advisory group to
assist in evaluating project applications. Following its competitive selection process, an MPO must submit
its programming recommendations to the Commission along with a list of the members of its
multidisciplinary advisory group. If the MPO submitted a project application and that project is
recommended for programming, the MPO must explain how its evaluation process resulted in an
unbiased evaluation of projects.
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) 9
SCREENING CRITERIA
Demonstrated needs of the applicant; A project that is already fully funded will not be considered for
funding in the Active Transportation Program. The Commission will make an exception to this policy by
allowing the supplanting of federal funds on a project for the 2014 Active Transportation Program.
Consistency with a regional transportation plan: All projects submitted must be consistent with the
relevant adopted regional transportation plan that has been developed and updated pursuant to
Government Code Section 65080.
SCORING CRITERIA
Proposed projects will be rated and ranked on the basis of applicant responses to the below criteria.
Project programming recommendations may not be based strictly on the rating criteria given the various
components of the Active Transportation Program and requirements of the various fund sources.
• Potential for increased walking and bicycling, especially among students, including the
identification of walking and bicycling routes to and from schools, transit facilities, community
centers, employment centers, and other destinations; and including increasing and improving
connectivity and mobility of non -motorized users. (0 to 30 points)
• Potential for reducing the number and/or rate of pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities and injuries,
including the identification of safety hazards for pedestrians and bicyclists. (0 to 25 points)
• Public participation and Planning. (0 to 15 points)
Identification of the community -based public participation process that culminated in the project
proposal, which may include noticed meetings and consultation with local stakeholders. Project
applicants must clearly articulate how the local participation process resulted in the identification
and prioritization of the proposed project.
For projects costing $1 million or more, an emphasis will be placed on projects that are prioritized
in an adopted city or county bicycle transportation plan, pursuant to Section 891.2, pedestrian
plan, safe routes to school plan, active transportation plan, trail plan, or circulation element of a
general plan that incorporated elements of an active transportation plan. In future funding cycles,
the Commission expects to make consistency with an approved active transportation plan a
requirement for large projects.
• Cost-effectiveness. (0 to 10 points)
Applicants must:
o Discuss the relative costs and benefits of the range of alternatives considered.
o Quantify the safety and mobility benefit in relationship to both the total project cost and
the funds provided.
Caltrans must develop a benefit/cost model for infrastructure and non -infrastructure active
transportation projects in order to improve information available to decision makers at the state
and MPO level in future programming cycles by September 30, 2014.
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) 10
" I m p r o v e d p u b l i c h e a l t h t h r o u g h t h e t a r g e t i n g o f p o p u l a t i o n s w i t h h i g h r i s k f a c t o r s f o r o b e s i t y ,
p h y s i c a l i n a c t i v i t y , a s t h m a o r o t h e r h e a l t h i s s u e s . ( 0 t o 1 0 p o i n t s )
" B e n e f i t t o d i s a d v a n t a g e d c o m m u n i t i e s . ( 0 t o 1 0 p o i n t s )
" U s e o f t h e C a l i f o r n i a C o n s e r v a t i o n C o r p s o r a q u a l i f i e d c o m m u n i t y c o n s e r v a t i o n c o r p s , a s d e f i n e d
i n S e c t i o n 1 4 5 0 7 . 5 o f t h e P u b l i c R e s o u r c e s C o d e , a s p a r t n e r s t o u n d e r t a k e o r c o n s t r u c t
a p p l i c a b l e p r o j e c t s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h S e c t i o n 1 5 2 4 o f P u b l i c L a w 1 1 2 - 1 4 1 . P o i n t s w i l l b e
d e d u c t e d i f a n a p p l i c a n t d o e s n o t s e e k c o r p s p a r t i c i p a t i o n o r i f a n a p p l i c a n t i n t e n d s n o t t o u t i l i z e a
c o r p s i n a p r o j e c t i n w h i c h t h e c o r p s c a n p a r t i c i p a t e . ( 0 t o - 5 p o i n t s )
T h e C a l i f o r n i a C o n s e r v a t i o n C o r p s c a n b e c o n t a c t e d a t c c c . c a . g o v . C o m m u n i t y c o n s e r v a t i o n
c o r p s c a n b e c o n t a c t e d a t c a l i f o r n i a l o c a l c o n s e r v a t i o n c o r p s . o r g .
D i r e c t c o n t r a c t i n g w i t h t h e C a l i f o r n i a C o n s e r v a t i o n C o r p s o r a q u a l i f i e d c o m m u n i t y c o n s e r v a t i o n
c o r p s w i t h o u t b i d d i n g i s p e r m i s s i b l e p r o v i d e d t h a t t h e i m p l e m e n t i n g a g e n c y d e m o n s t r a t e s c o s t
e f f e c t i v e n e s s p e r 2 3 C F R 6 3 5 . 2 0 4 a n d o b t a i n s a p p r o v a l f r o m C a l t r a n s . A c o p y o f t h e a g r e e m e n t
b e t w e e n t h e i m p l e m e n t i n g a g e n c y a n d t h e p r o p o s e d c o n s e r v a t i o n c o r p s m u s t b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e
p r o j e c t a p p l i c a t i o n a s s u p p o r t i n g d o c u m e n t a t i o n .
" A p p l i c a n t ' s p e r f o r m a n c e o n p a s t g r a n t s . T h i s m a y i n c l u d e p r o j e c t d e l i v e r y , p r o j e c t b e n e f i t s
( a n t i c i p a t e d v . a c t u a l ) , a n d u s e o f t h e C a l i f o r n i a C o n s e r v a t i o n C o r p s o r q u a l i f i e d c o m m u n i t y
c o n s e r v a t i o n c o r p s ( p l a n n e d v . a c t u a l ) . A p p l i c a t i o n s f r o m a g e n c i e s w i t h d o c u m e n t e d p o o r
p e r f o r m a n c e r e c o r d s o n p a s t g r a n t s m a y b e e x c l u d e d f r o m c o m p e t i n g o r m a y b e p e n a l i z e d i n
s c o r i n g . ( 0 t o - 1 0 p o i n t s )
P R O J E C T E V A L U A T I O N C O M M I T T E E
C o m m i s s i o n s t a f f w i l l f o r m a m u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y P r o j e c t E v a l u a t i o n C o m m i t t e e t o a s s i s t i n e v a l u a t i n g p r o j e c t
a p p l i c a t i o n s . I n f o r m i n g t h e P r o j e c t E v a l u a t i o n C o m m i t t e e , s t a f f w i l l s e e k p a r t i c i p a n t s w i t h e x p e r t i s e i n
b i c y c l i n g a n d p e d e s t r i a n t r a n s p o r t a t i o n , i n c l u d i n g S a f e R o u t e s t o S c h o o l s t y p e p r o j e c t s , a n d i n p r o j e c t s
b e n e f i t i n g d i s a d v a n t a g e d c o m m u n i t i e s , a n d w i l l s e e k g e o g r a p h i c a l l y b a l a n c e d r e p r e s e n t a t i o n f r o m s t a t e
a g e n c i e s , l a r g e M P O s , r e g i o n a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n n i n g a g e n c i e s , l o c a l j u r i s d i c t i o n s i n s m a l l u r b a n a n d
r u r a l a r e a s , a n d n o n - g o v e r n m e n t a l o r g a n i z a t i o n s . P r i o r i t y f o r p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n t h e e v a l u a t i o n c o m m i t t e e w i l l
b e g i v e n t o t h o s e w h o d o n o t r e p r e s e n t a p r o j e c t a p p l i c a n t , o r w i l l n o t b e n e f i t f r o m p r o j e c t s s u b m i t t e d b y
o t h e r s .
I n r e v i e w i n g a n d s e l e c t i n g p r o j e c t s t o b e f u n d e d w i t h f e d e r a l R e c r e a t i o n a l T r a i l s p r o g r a m f u n d s , t h e
C o m m i s s i o n s t a f f w i l l c o l l a b o r a t e w i t h t h e D e p a r t m e n t o f P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n t o e v a l u a t e p r o p o s e d
p r o j e c t s .
M P O s , i n a d m i n i s t e r i n g a c o m p e t i t i v e s e l e c t i o n p r o c e s s , m u s t u s e a m u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y a d v i s o r y g r o u p ,
s i m i l a r t o t h e a f o r e m e n t i o n e d P r o j e c t E v a l u a t i o n C o m m i t t e e , t o a s s i s t i n e v a l u a t i n g p r o j e c t a p p l i c a t i o n s .
2 0 1 4 A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m G u i d e l i n e s ( 3 / 2 0 / 1 4 ) 1 1
PROGRAMMING
Following at least one public hearing, the Commission will adopt a program of projects for the Active
Transportation Program, by April 1 of each odd numbered year. The Active Transportation Program must
be developed consistent with the fund estimate and the amount programmed in each fiscal year must not
exceed the amount identified in the fund estimate.
The program of projects for each fiscal year will include, for each project, the amount to be funded from
the Active Transportation Program, and the estimated total cost of the project. Project costs in the Active
Transportation Program will include all project support costs and all project listings will specify costs for
each of the following components; (1) completion of all permits and environmental studies; (2)
preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates; (3) right-of-way capital outlay (4) support for right-of-
way acquisition; (5) construction capital outlay; and (6) construction management and engineering,
including surveys and inspection. The cost of each project component will be listed in the Active
Transportation Program no earlier than in the fiscal year in which the particular project component can be
implemented.
When proposing to fund only preconstruction components for a project, the applicant must demonstrate
the means by which it intends to fund the construction of a useable segment, consistent with the regional
transportation plan or the Ca!trans interregional transportation strategic plan.
When project design, right-of-way or construction are programmed before the implementing agency
completes the environmental process, updated cost estimates, updated analysis of the project's cost
effectiveness, and updated analysis of the project's ability to further the goals of the program must be
submitted to the Commission following completion of the environmental process. If this updated
information indicates that a project is expected to accomplish fewer benefits or is less cost effective as
compared with the initial project application, future funding for the project may be deleted from the
program. For the MPO selected competitions, this information must be submitted to the MPO. It is the
responsibility of the MPO to recommend that the project be deleted from the program if warranted.
The Commission will program and allocate funding to projects in whole thousands of dollars and will
include a project only if it is fully funded from a combination of Active Transportation Program and other
committed funding. The Commission will regard funds as committed when they are programmed by the
Commission or when the agency with discretionary authority over the funds has made its commitment to
the project by ordinance or resolution. For federal formula funds, including Surface Transportation
Program, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program, and federal formula transit funds,
the commitment may be by Federal approval of the Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement
Program. For federal discretionary funds, the commitment may be by federal approval of a full funding
grant agreement or by grant approval.
If the program of projects adopted by the Commission does not program the full capacity identified in the
fund estimate for a given fiscal year, the balance will remain available to advance programmed projects.
Subject to the availability of federal funds, a balance not programmed in one fiscal year will carry over
and be available for projects in the following fiscal year.
The intent of the Commission is to consolidate the allocation of federal funds to as few projects as
practicable. Therefore, the smallest project may be designated, at the time of programming, for state -only
funding.
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) 12
ALLOCATIONS
The Commission will consider the allocation of funds for a project when it receives an allocation request
and recommendation from Caltrans in the same manner as for the STIP (see section 64 of the STIP
guidelines). The recommendation will include a determination of project readiness, the availability of
appropriated funding, and the availability of all identified and committed supplementary funding.
Where the project is to be implemented by an agency other than the applicant, the allocation request
must include a copy of the Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement between the
project applicant and implementing agency.
The Commission will approve the allocation if the funds are available and the allocation is necessary to
implement the project as included in the adopted Active Transportation Program.
In order to ensure the timely use of all program funds, the Commission will, in the last quarter of the fiscal
year, allocate funds to projects programmed in a future fiscal year on a first -come, first served basis. If
there are insufficient funds, the Commission may delay the allocation of funds to a project until the next
fiscal year without requiring an extension. Should requests for allocations exceed available capacity, the
Commission will give priority to projects programmed in the current -year.
Allocation requests for a project in the MPO selected portion of the program must include a
recommendation by the MPO.
In compliance with Section 21150 of the Public Resources Code, the Commission will not allocate funds
for design, right-of-way, or construction prior to documentation of environmental clearance under the
California Environmental Quality Act. As a matter of policy, the Commission will not allocate funds for
design, right-of-way, or construction of a federally funded project prior to documentation of environmental
clearance under the National Environmental Policy Act. Exceptions to this policy may be made in
instances where federal law allows for the acquisition of right-of-way prior to completion of National
Environmental Policy Act review.
If an implementing agency requests an allocation of funds in an amount that is less than the amount
programmed, the balance of the programmed amount may be allocated to a programmed project
advanced from a future fiscal year. An MPO, in administering its competitive portion of the Active
Transportation Program, must determine which projects to advance and make that recommendation to
the Commission. Unallocated funds in one fiscal year will carry over and be available for projects in the
following fiscal year.
PROJECT DELIVERY
Active Transportation Program allocations must be requested in the fiscal year of project programming,
and are valid for award for six months from the date of allocation unless the Commission approves an
extension. Applicants may submit and the Commission will evaluate extension requests in the same
manner as for STIP projects (see section 66 of the STIP guidelines) except that extension to the period
for project allocation and for project award will be limited to twelve months. Extension requests for a
project in the MPO selected portion of the program must include a recommendation by the MPO,
consistent with the preceding requirements.
If there are insufficient funds, the Commission may delay the allocation of funds to a project until the next
fiscal year without requiring an extension.
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) 13
Whenever programmed funds are not allocated within the fiscal year they programmed or within the time
allowed by an approved extension, the project will be deleted from the Active Transportation Program.
Funds available following the deletion of a project may be allocated to a programmed project advanced
from a future fiscal year. An MPO, in administering its competitive portion of the Active Transportation
Program, must determine which projects to advance and make that recommendation to the Commission.
Unallocated funds in one fiscal year will carry over and be available for projects in the following fiscal
year.
The implementing agency must enter into a cooperative agreement with Caltrans and, if the project is
federally funded, obligate the federal funds within six months.
Funds allocated for project development or right of way costs must be expended by the end of the second
fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the funds were allocated. After the award of a contract, the
implementing agency has up to 36 months to complete (accept) the contract. At the time of fund
allocation, the Commission may extend the deadline for completion of work and the liquidation of funds if
necessary to accommodate the proposed expenditure plan for the project. The implementing agency has
six months after contract acceptance to make the final payment to the contractor or vendor, prepare the
Final Report of Expenditures and submit the final invoice to Caltrans for reimbursement.
It is incumbent upon the implementing agency to develop accurate project cost estimates. If the amount
of a contract award is less than the amount allocated, or if the final cost of a component is less than the
amount awarded, the savings generated will not be available for future programming.
Caltrans will track the delivery of Active Transportation Program projects and submit to the Commission a
semiannual report showing the delivery of each project phase.
PROJECT INACTIVITY
Once funds for a project are encumbered, project applicants are expected to invoice on a regular basis
(for federal funds, see 23 CFR 630.106 and the Caltrans' Inactive Obligation Policy). Failure to do so will
result in the project being deemed "inactive" and subject to deobligation if proper justification is not
provided.
PROJECT REPORTING
As a condition of the project allocation, the Commission will require the implementing agency to submit
semi-annual reports on the activities and progress made toward implementation of the project and a final
delivery report. An agency implementing a project in the MPO selected portion of the program must also
submit copies of its semi-annual reports and of its final delivery report to the MPO. The purpose of the
reports is to ensure that the project is executed in a timely fashion and is within the scope and budget
identified when the decision was made to fund the project.
Within one year of the project becoming operable, the implementing agency must provide a final delivery
report to the Commission which includes:
• The scope of the completed project as compared to the programmed project.
• Before and after photos documenting the project.
• The final costs as compared to the approved project budget.
• Its duration as compared to the project schedule in the project application.
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) 14
" P e r f o r m a n c e o u t c o m e s d e r i v e d f r o m t h e p r o j e c t a s c o m p a r e d t o t h o s e d e s c r i b e d i n t h e p r o j e c t
a p p l i c a t i o n . T h i s s h o u l d i n c l u d e b e f o r e a n d a f t e r p e d e s t r i a n a n d / o r b i c y c l e c o u n t s , a n d a n
e x p l a n a t i o n o f t h e m e t h o d o l o g y f o r c o n d u c t i o n c o u n t s .
" A c t u a l u s e o f t h e C a l i f o r n i a C o n s e r v a t i o n C o r p s o r q u a l i f i e d c o m m u n i t y c o n s e r v a t i o n c o r p s a s
c o m p a r e d t o t h e u s e i n t h e p r o j e c t a p p l i c a t i o n .
P l e a s e n o t e t h a t t h e f i n a l d e l i v e r y r e p o r t r e q u i r e d b y t h i s s e c t i o n i s i n a d d i t i o n t o t h e a f o r e m e n t i o n e d F i n a l
R e p o r t o f E x p e n d i t u r e s .
F o r t h e p u r p o s e o f t h i s s e c t i o n , a p r o j e c t b e c o m e s o p e r a b l e w h e n t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n c o n t r a c t i s a c c e p t e d o r
a c q u i r e d e q u i p m e n t i s r e c e i v e d , o r i n t h e c a s e o f n o n - i n f r a s t r u c t u r e a c t i v i t i e s , w h e n t h e a c t i v i t i e s a r e
c o m p l e t e .
C a l t r a n s m u s t a u d i t a s a m p l e o f A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m p r o j e c t s t o e v a l u a t e t h e p e r f o r m a n c e o f
t h e p r o j e c t , d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r p r o j e c t c o s t s i n c u r r e d a n d r e i m b u r s e d a r e i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e e x e c u t e d
p r o j e c t a g r e e m e n t o r a p p r o v e d a m e n d m e n t s t h e r e o f ; s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l l a w s a n d r e g u l a t i o n s ; c o n t r a c t
p r o v i s i o n s ; a n d C o m m i s s i o n g u i d e l i n e s , a n d w h e t h e r p r o j e c t d e l i v e r a b l e s ( o u t p u t s ) a n d o u t c o m e s a r e
c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e p r o j e c t s c o p e , s c h e d u l e a n d b e n e f i t s d e s c r i b e d i n t h e e x e c u t e d p r o j e c t a g r e e m e n t o r
a p p r o v e d a m e n d m e n t s t h e r e o f . A r e p o r t o n t h e p r o j e c t s a u d i t e d m u s t b e s u b m i t t e d t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n
a n n u a l l y .
R O L E S A N D R E S P O N S I B I L I T I E S
C A L I F O R N I A T R A N S P O R T A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N ( C O M M I S S I O N )
T h e C o m m i s s i o n r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s i n c l u d e :
" A d o p t g u i d e l i n e s a n d p o l i c i e s f o r t h e A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m .
" A d o p t A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m F u n d E s t i m a t e .
" E v a l u a t e p r o j e c t s , i n c l u d i n g t h e f o r m i n g o f t h e P r o j e c t E v a l u a t i o n C o m m i t t e e .
" A d o p t a p r o g r a m o f p r o j e c t s , i n c l u d i n g :
o T h e s t a t e w i d e p o r t i o n o f t h e A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m ,
o T h e r u r a l p o r t i o n o f t h e A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m ,
o T h e s m a l l u r b a n p o r t i o n o f t h e A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m , a n d
o T h e M P O s e l e c t e d p o r t i o n o f t h e p r o g r a m b a s e d o n t h e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s o f t h e M P O s .
o E n s u r e t h a t a t l e a s t 2 5 % o f t h e f u n d s b e n e f i t d i s a d v a n t a g e c o m m u n i t i e s .
" A l l o c a t e f u n d s t o p r o j e c t s .
" E v a l u a t e a n d r e p o r t t o t h e l e g i s l a t u r e .
C A L I F O R N I A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N ( C A L T R A N S )
C a l t r a n s h a s t h e p r i m a r y r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r t h e a d m i n i s t r a t i o n o f t h e A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m .
R e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s i n c l u d e :
" P r o v i d e s t a t e w i d e p r o g r a m a n d p r o c e d u r a l g u i d a n c e ( i . e . p r o v i d e p r o j e c t e v a l u a t i o n o f m a t e r i a l s
a n d i n s t r u c t i o n s ) , c o n d u c t s o u t r e a c h t h r o u g h v a r i o u s n e t w o r k s s u c h a s , b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o , t h e
A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m w e b s i t e , a n d a t c o n f e r e n c e s , m e e t i n g s , o r w o r k g r o u p s .
" P r o v i d e p r o g r a m t r a i n i n g .
" S o l i c i t p r o j e c t a p p l i c a t i o n s f o r t h e p r o g r a m .
2 0 1 4 A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m G u i d e l i n e s ( 3 / 2 0 / 1 4 ) 1 5
" F a c i l i t a t e t h e P r o j e c t E v a l u a t i o n C o m m i t t e e .
" P e r f o r m e l i g i b i l i t y r e v i e w s o f A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m p r o j e c t s .
" E v a l u a t e , s c o r e , a n d r a n k a p p l i c a t i o n s .
" R e c o m m e n d p r o j e c t s t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r p r o g r a m m i n g a n d a l l o c a t i o n .
" N o t i f y a p p l i c a n t s o f t h e r e s u l t s a f t e r e a c h c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s .
" T r a c k a n d r e p o r t o n p r o j e c t i m p l e m e n t a t i o n .
" A u d i t a s e l e c t i o n o f p r o j e c t s
" S e r v e a s t h e m a i n p o i n t o f c o n t a c t i n p r o j e c t i m p l e m e n t a t i o n , i n c l u d i n g t h e t e c h n i c a l a s s i s t a n c e
r e s o u r c e c e n t e r , a f t e r n o t i f y i n g s u c c e s s f u l a p p l i c a n t s o f a w a r d .
M E T R O P O L I T A N P L A N N I N G O R G A N I Z A T I O N S ( M P O S ) W I T H L A R G E
U R B A N I Z E D A R E A S
M P O s w i t h l a r g e u r b a n i z e d a r e a s a r e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r o v e r s e e i n g a c o m p e t i t i v e p r o j e c t s e l e c t i o n p r o c e s s
i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e s e g u i d e l i n e s . T h e r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s i n c l u d e :
" E n s u r e t h a t a t l e a s t 2 5 % o f t h e f u n d s i n e a c h M P O m u s t b e n e f i t d i s a d v a n t a g e c o m m u n i t i e s .
" I f u s i n g d i f f e r e n t p r o j e c t s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a o r w e i g h t i n g , m i n i m u m p r o j e c t s i z e , m a t c h r e q u i r e m e n t ,
o r d e f i n i t i o n o f d i s a d v a n t a g e c o m m u n i t i e s f o r i t s c o m p e t i t i v e s e l e c t i o n p r o c e s s , t h e M P O m u s t
o b t a i n C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v a l p r i o r t o t h e M P O ' s c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s . U s e o f a m i n i m u m p r o j e c t s i z e o f
$ 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 o r l e s s , o r o f a d i f f e r e n t m a t c h r e q u i r e m e n t t h a n i n t h e s t a t e w i d e c o m p e t i t i v e p r o g r a m
d o e s n o t r e q u i r e p r i o r C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v a l .
" I f e l e c t i n g t o h a v e a s u p p l e m e n t a l M P O s p e c i f i c c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s , t h e p r o j e c t s w i t h i n t h e M P O
b o u n d a r i e s t h a t w e r e n o t s e l e c t e d t h r o u g h t h e s t a t e w i d e c o m p e t i t i o n m u s t b e c o n s i d e r e d a l o n g
w i t h t h o s e r e c e i v e d i n t h e s u p p l e m e n t a l c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s . A n M P O m u s t n o t i f y t h e C o m m i s s i o n o f
t h e i r i n t e n t t o h a v e a s u p p l e m e n t a l c a l l n o l a t e r t h a n M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 4 .
" I n a d m i n i s t e r i n g a c o m p e t i t i v e s e l e c t i o n p r o c e s s , a n M P O m u s t u s e a m u l t i d i s c i p l i n a r y a d v i s o r y
g r o u p t o a s s i s t i n e v a l u a t i n g p r o j e c t a p p l i c a t i o n s .
" I n a d m i n i s t e r i n g a c o m p e t i t i v e s e l e c t i o n p r o c e s s , a n M P O m u s t e x p l a i n h o w t h e p r o j e c t s
r e c o m m e n d e d f o r p r o g r a m m i n g b y t h e M P O i n c l u d e a b r o a d s p e c t r u m o f p r o j e c t s t o b e n e f i t
p e d e s t r i a n s a n d b i c y c l i s t s . T h e e x p l a n a t i o n m u s t i n c l u d e a d i s c u s s i o n o f h o w t h e r e c o m m e n d e d
p r o j e c t s b e n e f i t s t u d e n t s w a l k i n g a n d c y c l i n g t o s c h o o l .
" A n M P O c h o o s i n g t o u s e t h e s a m e p r o j e c t s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a a n d w e i g h t i n g , m i n i m u m p r o j e c t s i z e ,
m a t c h r e q u i r e m e n t , a n d d e f i n i t i o n o f d i s a d v a n t a g e c o m m u n i t i e s a s u s e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n f o r
t h e s t a t e w i d e c o m p e t i t i o n m a y d e f e r i t s p r o j e c t s e l e c t i o n t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n . A n M P O d e f e r r i n g i t s
p r o j e c t s e l e c t t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n m u s t n o t i f y t h e C o m m i s s i o n m y M a y 2 1 , 2 0 1 4 , a n d m a y n o t
c o n d u c t a s u p p l e m e n t a l c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s .
" A p p r o v e a m e n d m e n t s t o t h e M P O s e l e c t e d p o r t i o n o f t h e p r o g r a m p r i o r t o C o m m i s s i o n a p p r o v a l .
" R e c o m m e n d a l l o c a t i o n r e q u e s t s f o r a p r o j e c t i n t h e M P O s e l e c t e d p o r t i o n o f t h e p r o g r a m .
" D e t e r m i n e w h i c h p r o j e c t s t o a d v a n c e a n d m a k e t h a t r e c o m m e n d a t i o n t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n .
" S u b m i t a n a n n u a l a s s e s s m e n t o f i t s p o r t i o n o f t h e p r o g r a m i t t e r m s o f i t s e f f e c t i v e n e s s i n
a c h i e v i n g t h e g o a l s o f t h e A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m .
I n a d d i t i o n , t h e f o l l o w i n g s t a t u t o r y r e q u i r e m e n t s a p p l y s p e c i f i c a l l y t o t h e S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a A s s o c i a t i o n
o f G o v e r n m e n t s ( S C A G ) :
" S C A G m u s t c o n s u l t w i t h c o u n t y t r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o m m i s s i o n s , t h e C o m m i s s i o n , a n d C a l t r a n s i n t h e
d e v e l o p m e n t o f c o m p e t i t i v e p r o j e c t s e l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a . T h e c r i t e r i a s h o u l d i n c l u d e c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f
g e o g r a p h i c e q u i t y , c o n s i s t e n t w i t h p r o g r a m o b j e c t i v e s .
2 0 1 4 A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m G u i d e l i n e s ( 3 / 2 0 / 1 4 ) 1 6
" S C A G m u s t p l a c e p r i o r i t y o n p r o j e c t s t h a t a r e c o n s i s t e n t w i t h p l a n s a d o p t e d b y l o c a l a n d r e g i o n a l
g o v e r n m e n t s w i t h i n t h e c o u n t y w h e r e t h e p r o j e c t i s l o c a t e d .
" S C A G m u s t o b t a i n c o n c u r r e n c e f r o m t h e c o u n t y t r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o m m i s s i o n s .
R E G I O N A L T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N N I N G A G E N C I E S ( R T P A S ) O U T S I D E A N
M P O W I T H L A R G E U R B A N I Z E D A R E A S A N D A N M P O W I T H O U T L A R G E
U R B A N I Z E D A R E A S
T h e s e R e g i o n a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n n i n g A g e n c i e s a n d M P O s m a y m a k e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s o r p r o v i d e
i n p u t t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n r e g a r d i n g t h e p r o j e c t s w i t h i n t h e i r b o u n d a r i e s t h a t a r e a p p l y i n g f o r A c t i v e
T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m f u n d i n g .
P R O J E C T A P P L I C A N T
P r o j e c t a p p l i c a n t s n o m i n a t e A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m p r o j e c t s f o r f u n d i n g c o n s i d e r a t i o n . I f a w a r d e d
A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m f u n d i n g f o r a s u b m i t t e d p r o j e c t , t h e p r o j e c t a p p l i c a n t ( o r p a r t n e r i n g
i m p l e m e n t i n g a g e n c y i f a p p l i c a b l e ) h a s c o n t r a c t u a l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r c a r r y i n g o u t t h e p r o j e c t t o c o m p l e t i o n
a n d c o m p l y i n g w i t h r e p o r t i n g r e q u i r e m e n t s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h f e d e r a l , s t a t e , a n d l o c a l l a w s a n d
r e g u l a t i o n s , a n d t h e s e g u i d e l i n e s .
F o r c a p i t a l p r o j e c t s o f f t h e s t a t e h i g h w a y s y s t e m , t h e p r o j e c t a p p l i c a n t w i l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e o n g o i n g
o p e r a t i o n s a n d m a i n t e n a n c e o f t h e f a c i l i t y . I f a n o t h e r e n t i t y a g r e e s t o a s s u m e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r t h e
o n g o i n g o p e r a t i o n s a n d m a i n t e n a n c e o f t h e f a c i l i t y , d o c u m e n t a t i o n o f t h e a g r e e m e n t m u s t b e s u b m i t t e d
w i t h t h e p r o j e c t a p p l i c a t i o n , a n d a c o p y o f t h e M e m o r a n d u m o f U n d e r s t a n d i n g o r I n t e r a g e n c y A g r e e m e n t
b e t w e e n t h e p a r t i e s m u s t b e s u b m i t t e d w i t h t h e r e q u e s t f o r a l l o c a t i o n .
A C T I V E T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P L A N
A c i t y , c o u n t y , c o u n t y t r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o m m i s s i o n , r e g i o n a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n n i n g a g e n c y , M P O , s c h o o l
d i s t r i c t , o r t r a n s i t d i s t r i c t m a y p r e p a r e a n a c t i v e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n . A n a c t i v e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n p r e p a r e d
b y a c i t y o r c o u n t y m a y b e i n t e g r a t e d i n t o t h e c i r c u l a t i o n e l e m e n t o f i t s g e n e r a l p l a n o r a s e p a r a t e p l a n
w h i c h i s c o m p l i a n t o r w i l l b e b r o u g h t i n t o c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e C o m p l e t e S t r e e t s A c t , A s s e m b l y B i l l 1 3 5 8
( C h a p t e r 6 5 7 , S t a t u t e s o f 2 0 0 8 ) . A n a c t i v e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n m u s t i n c l u d e , b u t n o t b e l i m i t e d t o , t h e
f o l l o w i n g c o m p o n e n t s o r e x p l a i n w h y t h e c o m p o n e n t i s n o t a p p l i c a b l e :
a ) T h e e s t i m a t e d n u m b e r o f e x i s t i n g b i c y c l e t r i p s a n d p e d e s t r i a n t r i p s i n t h e p l a n a r e a , b o t h i n
a b s o l u t e n u m b e r s a n d a s a p e r c e n t a g e o f a l l t r i p s , a n d t h e e s t i m a t e d i n c r e a s e i n t h e n u m b e r o f
b i c y c l e t r i p s a n d p e d e s t r i a n t r i p s r e s u l t i n g f r o m i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e p l a n .
b ) T h e n u m b e r a n d l o c a t i o n o f c o l l i s i o n s , s e r i o u s i n j u r i e s , a n d f a t a l i t i e s s u f f e r e d b y b i c y c l i s t s a n d
p e d e s t r i a n s i n t h e p l a n a r e a , b o t h i n a b s o l u t e n u m b e r s a n d a s a p e r c e n t a g e o f a l l c o l l i s i o n s a n d
i n j u r i e s , a n d a g o a l f o r c o l l i s i o n , s e r i o u s i n j u r y , a n d f a t a l i t y r e d u c t i o n a f t e r i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f t h e
p l a n .
c ) A m a p a n d d e s c r i p t i o n o f e x i s t i n g a n d p r o p o s e d l a n d u s e a n d s e t t l e m e n t p a t t e r n s w h i c h m u s t
I n c l u d e , b u t n o t b e l i m i t e d t o , l o c a t i o n s o f r e s i d e n t i a l n e i g h b o r h o o d s , s c h o o l s , s h o p p i n g c e n t e r s ,
p u b l i c b u i l d i n g s , m a j o r e m p l o y m e n t c e n t e r s , a n d o t h e r d e s t i n a t i o n s .
d ) A m a p a n d d e s c r i p t i o n o f e x i s t i n g a n d p r o p o s e d b i c y c l e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n f a c i l i t i e s .
e ) A m a p a n d d e s c r i p t i o n o f e x i s t i n g a n d p r o p o s e d e n d - o f - t r i p b i c y c l e p a r k i n g f a c i l i t i e s .
f ) A d e s c r i p t i o n o f e x i s t i n g a n d p r o p o s e d p o l i c i e s r e l a t e d t o b i c y c l e p a r k i n g i n p u b l i c l o c a t i o n s ,
p r i v a t e p a r k i n g g a r a g e s a n d p a r k i n g l o t s a n d i n n e w c o m m e r c i a l a n d r e s i d e n t i a l d e v e l o p m e n t s .
2 0 1 4 A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m G u i d e l i n e s ( 3 / 2 0 / 1 4 ) 1 7
g) A map and description of existing and proposed bicycle transport and parking facilities for
connections with and use of other transportation modes. These must include, but not be limited
to, parking facilities at transit stops, rail and transit terminals, ferry docks and landings, park and
ride lots, and provisions for transporting bicyclists and bicycles on transit or rail vehicles or ferry
vessels.
h) A map and description of existing and proposed pedestrian facilities at major transit hubs. These
must include, but are not limited to, rail and transit terminals, and ferry docks and landings.
i) A description of proposed signage providing wayfinding along bicycle and pedestrian networks to
designated destinations.
j) A description of the policies and procedures for maintaining existing and proposed bicycle and
pedestrian facilities, including, but not limited to, the maintenance of smooth pavement, freedom
from encroaching vegetation, maintenance of traffic control devices including striping and other
pavement markings, and lighting.
k) A description of bicycle and pedestrian safety, education, and encouragement programs
conducted in the area included within the plan, efforts by the law enforcement agency having
primary traffic law enforcement responsibility in the area to enforce provisions of the law
impacting bicycle and pedestrian safety, and the resulting effect on accidents involving bicyclists
and pedestrians.
I) A description of the extent of community involvement in development of the plan, including
disadvantaged and underserved communities.
m) A description of how the active transportation plan has been coordinated with neighboring
jurisdictions, including school districts within the plan area, and is consistent with other local or
regional transportation, air quality, or energy conservation plans, including, but not limited to,
general plans and a Sustainable Community Strategy in a Regional Transportation Plan.
n) A description of the projects and programs proposed in the plan and a listing of their priorities for
implementation, including the methodology for project prioritization and a proposed timeline for
implementation.
o) A description of past expenditures for bicycle and pedestrian facilities and programs, and future
financial needs for projects and programs that improve safety and convenience for bicyclists and
pedestrians in the plan area. Include anticipated revenue sources and potential grant funding for
bicycle and pedestrian uses.
p) A description of steps necessary to implement the plan and the reporting process that will be
used to keep the adopting agency and community informed of the progress being made in
implementing the plan.
q) A resolution showing adoption of the plan by the city, county or district. If the active transportation
plan was prepared by a county transportation commission, regional transportation planning
agency, MPO, school district or transit district, the plan should indicate the support via resolution
of the city(s) or county(s) in which the proposed facilities would be located.
A city, county, school district, or transit district that has prepared an active transportation plan may submit
the plan to the county transportation commission or transportation planning agency for approval. The city,
county, school district, or transit district may submit an approved plan to Caltrans in connection with an
application for funds active transportation facilities which will implement the plan.
Additional information related to active transportation plans can be found in the sections on Funding for
Active Transportation Plans and Scoring Criteria.
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) 18
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
Unless programmed for state -only funding, project applicants must comply with the provisions of Title 23
of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations and with the processes and procedures contained in the
Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual and the Master Agreement with Caltrans. Below are
examples of federal requirements that must be met when administering Active Transportation Program
projects.
• National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance and documentation is required on all
projects. Refer to Chapter 6, Environmental Procedures, of the Local Assistance Procedures
Manual for guidance and procedures on complying with NEPA and other federal environmentally
related laws.
• Project applicants may not proceed with the final design of a project or request "Authorization to
proceed with Right -of -Way" or "Authorization to proceed with Construction" until Caltrans has
signed a Categorical Exclusion, a Finding of No Significant Impact, or a Record of Decision.
Failure to follow this requirement will make the project ineligible for federal reimbursement.
• If the project requires the purchase of right of way (the acquisition of real property), the provisions
of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 apply.
For more information, refer to Chapter 13, Right of Way, of the Local Assistance Procedures
Manual.
If the project applicant requires the consultation services of architects, landscape architects, land
surveyors, or engineers, the procedures in the Chapter 10, Consultant Selection, of the Local
Assistance Procedures Manual must be followed.
Contract documents are required to incorporate applicable federal requirements such as Davis
Bacon wage rates, competitive bidding, Disadvantaged Business Enterprises/Equal Employment
Opportunity provisions, etc. For more information, refer to Chapter 9, Civil Rights and
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises, and Chapter 12, Plans, Specifications & Estimate, of the
Local Assistance Procedures Manual
Failure to comply with federal requirements may result in the repayment to the State of Active
Transportation Program funds.
DESIGN STANDARDS
Streets and Highways Code Section 891 requires that all city, county, regional, and other local agencies
responsible for the development or operation of bikeways or roadways where bicycle travel is permitted
utilize all minimum safety design criteria established by Caltrans. Chapter 11, Design Standards, of the
Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual describes statewide design standards, specifications,
procedures, guides, and references that are acceptable in the geometric, drainage, and structural design
of Local Assistance projects. The chapter also describes design exception approval procedures, including
the delegation of design exception approval authority to the City and County Public Works Directors for
projects not on the state highway system. These standards and procedures, including the exception
approval process, must be used for all Active Transportation Program projects.
For capital projects off the state highway system, the project applicant will be responsible for the ongoing
operations and maintenance of the facility. If another entity agrees to assume responsibility for the
ongoing operations and maintenance of the facility, documentation of the agreement must be submitted
with the project application, and a copy of the Memorandum of Understanding or Interagency Agreement
between the parties must be submitted with the request for allocation.
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) 19
All facilities constructed using Active Transportation Program funds cannot revert to a non -Active
Transportation Program use for a minimum of 20 years or its actual useful life as documented in the
project application, whichever is less, without approval of the Commission.
PROGRAM EVALUATION
The Active Transportation Program will be evaluated for its effectiveness in increasing the use of active
modes of transportation in California. Applicants that receive funding for a project must collect and submit
data to Caltrans as described in the "Project Reporting" section.
By December 31, 2014, the Commission will post on its website information about the initial program of
projects, including a list of all projects programmed and allocated in each portion of the program, by
region, and by project type, along with information on grants awarded to disadvantaged communities,
After 2014, the Commission will include in its annual report to the Legislature a discussion on the
effectiveness of the program in terms of planned and achieved improvement in mobility and safety and
timely use of funds, and will include a summary of its activities relative to the administration of the Active
Transportation Program including:
• Projects programmed,
• Projects allocated,
• Projects completed to date by project type,
• Projects completed to date by geographic distribution,
• Projects completed to date by benefit to disadvantaged communities, and
• Projects completed to date with the California Conservation Corps or qualified community
conservation corps.
2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines (3/20/14) 20
Guidelines Revisions Summary
Attachment 2
The table below summarizes revisions to the Active Transportation Program Guidelines following the February 3, 2014
submission to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee.
Section
Page
Revision
Matching Requirements
3
Statement that matching funds over and above the required 11.47% were exempt from
concurrent and proportional expenditure with Active Transportation Program funds was
removed due to inconsistency with federal policy.
Matching Requirements
3
Clarified that the matching funds over and above the required 11.47% may be
adjusted before or shortly after contract award to reflect any substantive change
in the bid compared to the estimated cost of the project.
1
I
Eligible Applicants 5
To match wording in statutes, clarified that private nonprofit tax-exempt organizations
may apply for recreational trails and trailheads, park projects that facilitate trail
linkages or connectivity to nonmotorized corridors, and conversion of abandoned
railroad corridors to trails.
Example Projects
6
Secure bicycle parking at employment centers, park and ride lots, rail and transit
stations, and ferry docks and landings for the benefit of the public.
March 20, 2014
Attachment 3
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Adoption of 2014 Active Transportation Program Guidelines
March 20, 2014
RESOLUTION G-14-05
1.1 WHEREAS the Active Transportation Program was created by Senate Bill 99 (Chapter 359,
Statutes of 2013) to encourage increased use of active modes of transportation, such as biking
and walking, and
1.2 WHEREAS Streets and Highways Code section 2382(a) requires the Commission to develop
guidelines for the Active Transportation Program, and
1.3 WHEREAS Streets and Highways Code section 2382(a) requires the Commission form an
Active Transportation Program Workgroup to provide guidance on matters including, the
development of guidelines, and
1.4 WHEREAS the Commission formed an Active Transportation Program Workgroup and held
multiple workgroup meetings between October 2013 and March 2014, and
1.5 WHEREAS Streets and Highways Code section 2382(d) requires the Commission to hold at
least two public hearings prior to adopting the guidelines, and
1.6 WHEREAS a draft of proposed guidelines was presented at the December 10, 2013
Commission meeting and the Commission held public hearings on the guidelines on January
22, 2014 and January 29, 2014, and
1.7 WHEREAS Senate Bill 99 requires the Commission to submit the draft guidelines to the
Joint Legislative Budget Committee no later than 45 days prior to adopting the initial set of
final guidelines, and
1.8 WHEREAS the Commission submitted the draft guidelines to the Joint Legislative Budget
Committee on February 3, 2014.
2.1 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Commission adopts the 2014 Active
Transportation Program guidelines, as presented by staff on March 20, 2014, and
2.2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the purpose of these guidelines is to identify the
Commission's policy and expectations for the Active Transportation Program and thus to
provide guidance to applicants, implementing agencies, and Metropolitan Planning
Organizations, and
2.3 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these guidelines do not preclude any project nomination
or any project selection that is consistent with the implementing legislation, and
2.4 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Commission directs staff to post these guidelines on
the Commission's website.
2/28/2014 DRAFT
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
APPLICATION
CYCLE 1 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (ATP)
Please read the Application Instructions at
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/Loca 1 Proq rams/atp/i ndex. htm I
prior to filling out this application
Project name:
For Caltrans use only: TAP STP RTP _ _. .SRTS SRTS-NI SHA
DAC Non-DAC Plan
2/28/2014 7:44 AM
Page 1 of 18
2/28/2014
i
4 1,
DRAFT
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
Project name:
(fill out all of the fields below)
1. APPLICANT (Agency name, address and zip code)
2. PROJECT FUNDING
ATP funds Requested $
Matching Funds $
3. APPLICANT CONTACT (Name, title, e-mail, phone #)
(If Applicable)
Other Project funds $
TOTAL PROJECT COST $
4. APPLICANT CONTACT (Address & zip code)
5. PROJECT COUNTY(IES):
6. CALTRANS DISTRICT #- Click Drop down menu below
Select District.
7. Application # of
Area Description:
8. Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)-
click drop down menu
Select MPO.
9. Population Size- click drop down menu
Select population size
10. If "Other" was selected from the #8 MPO drop down menu enter your MPO or Regional Transportation Planning
Agency (RTPA) 1
Master Agreements (MAs)-
11. ® Yes, the applicant has a FEDERAL MA with Caltrans. _
12. ❑ Yes, the applicant has a STATE MA with Caltrans.
13. If the applicant does not have an MA. Do you meet the Master Agreement requirements?
Y/N The Applicant MUST be able to enter into MAs with Caltrans
Partner Information:
14. Partner Name":
15. Partner Type
16. Contact Information (Name, phone # & e-mail)
17. Contact Address & zip code
Click here if the project has more than one partner; attach the remaining partner information on a
separate page
"If another entity is going to assume responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the facility, documentation of the
agreement must be submitted with the application.
Project Type (Select only one)
18. Infrastructure (IF)
19. Non -Infrastructure (NI) i 20. Combined (IF & NI)
2/28/2014 7:44 AM Page 2 of 18
2/28/2014
DRAFT 46
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
Project name:
I. GENERAL INFORMATION -continued
Sub -Project Type (Select all that apply)
21. Develop a Plan in a Disadvantaged Community (select any that apply)
o Bicycle Plan o Safe Routes to School Plan o Pedestrian Plan
r'o Active Transportation Plan (select if applying)
(if applying for an Active Transportation Plan- check any of the following that you already have)
_Bike plan, _Pedestrian plan, _Safe Routes to School (SRTS) plan, _ATP plan
22. Bicycle and/or Pedestrian infrastructure
Bikeway : o Class I o Class II o Class III
o Sidewalk o Multi -use facility
Other:
23. Non -Infrastructure (Non SRTS)
24. Recreational Trails*- o Trail o Acquisition
*Please see additional Recreational Trails instructions before proceeding
25. SRTS
o Infrastructure o Non -Infrastructure
If SRTS is selected, provide the following information
26. SCHOOL NAME & ADDRESS:
27. SCHOOL DISTRICT NAME & ADDRESS:
28. County -District -School Code (CDS)
29. Total Student Enrollment
30. Percentage of students eligible for
free or reduced meal programs
31. Percentage of students that
currently walk or bike to school
32. Approximate # of students living
along school route proposed for
improvement
! Click here if the project involves more than one school; attach the remaining school information on a
separate page
2/28/2014 7:44 AM
Page 3 of 18
2/28/2014
DRAFT
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
II. PROJECT INFORMATION
(Please read the "ATP instructions" document prior to attaching your responses to all of the following questions in Sections II.
Project Information, Section III. Screening Criteria and Section IV. Narrative Questions - 15 pages max)
1. Project Location
2. Project Coordinates Latitude,
(decimal degrees)
3. Project Description
4. Project Status
Longitude +
2/28/2014 7:44 AM Page 4 of 18
2/28/2014
{
DRAFT
III. SCREENING CRITERIA
1. Demonstrated Needs of the Applicant
Describe the need for the project and/or funding
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
2. Consistency with Regional Transportation Plan (100 words or less)
Explain how this project is consistent with your Regional Transportation Plan, include adoption date of the
plan. (if applicable)
2/28/2014 7:44 AM Page 5 of 18
2/28/2014
DRAFT
IV. NARRATIVE QUESTIONS
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
1. POTENTIAL FOR INCREASED WALKING AND BICYCLING, ESPECIALLY AMONG STUDENTS,
INCLUDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF WALKING AND BICYCLING ROUTES TO AND FROM SCHOOLS,
TRANSIT FACILITIES, COMMUNITY CENTERS, EMPLOYMENT CENTERS, AND OTHER
DESTINATIONS; AND INCLUDING INCREASING AND IMPROVING CONNECTIVITY AND MOBILITY OF
NON -MOTORIZED USERS. (0-30 POINTS)
A. I. If you checked box #25- Describe how your project encourages increased walking and bicycling,
especially among students.
II. If you did not check box #25- Describe how your project encourages increased walking and bicycling.
B. Describe how this project improves walking and bicycling routes to and from, connects to, or is part of a
school or school facility, transit facility, community center, employment center, state or national trail
system, points of interest, and/or park.
C. Describe how this project increases and/or improves connectivity, removes a barrier to mobility and/or
closes a gap in a non -motorized facility.
D. Describe the number and type of possible users and their destinations and the percentage increase in
users upon completion of your project.
• Projects with significant potential- 21 to 30 points
• Projects with moderate potential- 11 to 20 points
• Projects with minimal potential- 1 to 10 points
• Projects with no potential- 0 points
2/28/2014 7:44 AM Page 6 of 18
2/28/2014
DRAFT 1‘
IV. NARRATIVE QUESTIONS- continued
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
2. POTENTIAL FOR REDUCING THE NUMBER AND/OR RATE OF PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST
FATALITIES AND INJURIES, INCLUDING THE IDENTIFICATION OF SAFETY HAZARDS FOR
PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS. (0-25 POINTS)
A. Describe the potential of the project to reduce pedestrian and/or bicycle injuries or fatalities.
B. Describe if/how your project will achieve any or all of the following:
o Reduces speed or volume of motor vehicles
o Improves sight distance and visibility
o Improves compliance with local traffic laws
o Eliminates behaviors that lead to collisions
o Addresses inadequate traffic control devices
o Addresses inadequate bicycle facilities, crosswalks or sidewalks
C. Describe the location's history of events and the source(s) of data used (e.g. collision reports, community
observation, surveys, audits).
• Projects with significant potential- 16 to 25 points
• Projects with moderate potential- 8 to 15 points
• Projects with minimal potential- 1 to 7 points
• Projects with no potential- 0 points
2/28/2014 7:44 AM Page 7 of 18
2/28/2014
e DRAFT '
IV. NARRATIVE QUESTIONS- continued
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
3. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION and PLANNING (0-15 POINTS)
A. Describe the community based public participation process that culminated in the project proposal or
plan, such as noticed meetings/public hearings, consultation with stakeholders, etc.
B. Describe the local participation process that resulted in the identification and prioritization of the project:
C. Is the project cost over $1 Million? Y/N
If Yes- is the project Prioritized in an adopted city or county bicycle transportation plan, pedestrian plan,
safe routes to school plan, active transportation plan, trail plan, circulation element of a general plan, or
other publicly approved plan that incorporated elements of an active transportation plan? Y/N I
• Projects with substantial participation of community members- 11 to 15 points
• Projects with moderate participation of community members - 6 to 10 points
• Projects with minimal participation of community members- 1 to 5 points
• Projects with no participation of community members- 0 points
2/28/2014 7:44 AM Page 8 of 18
2/28/2014
4
DRAFT
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
IV. NARRATIVE QUESTIONS- continued
4. COST EFFECTIVENESS (preferred and other alternatives). (0-10 POINTS)
A. Describe the alternatives that were considered.
B. Discuss the relative costs and benefits of the range of all the alternatives.
C. Discuss/quantify the safety benefits for each alternative, in relationship to both the total cost and the
funds requested.
D. Discuss/quantify the mobility benefits for each alternative, in relationship to both the total cost and the
funds requested.
E. Discuss why the preferred alternative was selected over the other alternatives.
• Applicant exceptionally described alternatives and quantified safety and mobility- 7 to 10 points
• Applicant adequately described alternatives and quantified safety and mobility - 4 to 6 points
• Applicant minimally described alternatives and quantified safety and mobility - 1 to 3 points
• Applicant did not describe alternatives or quantify safety or mobility - 0 points
2/28/2014 7:44 AM Page 9 of 18
2/28/2014
DRAFT 14tqii'
IV. NARRATIVE QUESTIONS- continued
5. IMPROVED PUBLIC HEALTH (0-10 points)
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
A. Describe how the project will improve public health, i.e. through the targeting of populations who have a
high risk factor for obesity, physical inactivity, asthma, or other health issues.
• Applicant exceptionally described how the project will improve public health- 7 to 10 points
• Applicant adequately described how the project will improve public health - 4 to 6 points
• Applicant minimally described how the project will improve public health - 1 to 3 points
• Applicant did not described how the project will improve public health - 0 points
2/28/2014 7:44 AM Page 10 of 18
2/28/2014 DRAFT ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
IV. NARRATIVE QUESTIONS- continued
6. BENEFIT TO DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES (0-10 points)
A. Does the project significantly benefit a disadvantaged community? Y/N
a. Which criteria does the project meet? (Select all that apply)
o median household income < 80% of the statewide median
o among the most disadvantaged 10% in the state
o at least 75% of the public school students are eligible for the National School Lunch Program
(NSLP)
o CTC approved other
B. Describe the disadvantaged community and their benefit from the project:
• Project clearly and significantly benefits a disadvantaged community- 10 points
• Project has potential or moderate benefits to a disadvantaged community- 5 points
• Project does not benefit a disadvantaged community- 0 points
2/28/2014 7:44 AM Page 11 of 18
2/28/2014
DRAFT
IV. NARRATIVE QUESTIONS- continued
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
7. USE OF CALIFORNIA CONSERVATION CORPS (CCC) OR A QUALIFIED COMMUNITY
CONSERVATION CORPS (0 to -5 points)
A. For Infrastructure Construction projects only- The applicant must send the following information to
the CCC and CALCC prior to application submittal to Caltrans:
o Project Description
o Detailed Estimate
o Project Map
o Preliminary Plan
o Project Schedule
Points will be deducted if an applicant does not seek corps participation or if an applicant intends not to
utilize a corps in a project in which the corps can participate.
The corps agencies can be contacted at:
California Conservation Corps at: www.ccc.ca.ciov,
Community Conservation Corps at: www.californialocalconservationcorps.orq.
B. Does the applicant intend to utilize the CCC or CALCC on those items where participation has been
indicated? Y/N
• The applicant has submitted the project application to CCC and CALCC - 0 points
• The applicant has not submitted the project application to CCC and CALCC (-)5 points
2/28/2014 7:44 AM Page 12 of 18
Ittlii
2/28/2014 DRAFT ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
IV. NARRATIVE QUESTIONS- continued
8. APPLICANT'S PERFORMANCE ON PAST GRANTS ( 0 to -10 points)
APPLICANT DO NOT RESPOND
Caltrans staff to determine the Applicant's performance on past grant awards.
1
• The applicant has no past grant experience or has performed satisfactorily on past grants - 0 '
points
• The applicant has not performed satisfactorily on past grants (-)10 points
2/28/2014 7:44 AM Page 13 of 18
2/28/2014
J
DRAFT
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
Project name:
V. PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
All project costs MUST be accounted for on this form, including elements of the overall project that will be, or has
been funded by other sources.
The information in the shaded fields will be calculated automatically. All costs will automatically be rounded up to
the next $1000.
ATP funds
Other funds
TOTAL FUNDS
Preliminary
Engineering (PE)
Environmental
$
$
$
Plan, Specs &
Estimate (PS&E)
$
$
$
Matching funds
Type-
$
PE subtotal
$
$
$
This application is not requesting funds for the PE phase
Right of Way
(ROW)
Right of way
Engineering
$
$
$
Appraisals,
Acquisitions &
Utilities
$
$
$
Matching funds
Type-
$
ROW subtotal
$
$
$
This application is not requesting funds for the ROW phase
Construction
(CON)
Construction
Engineering (CE)
$
$
$
Construction (Con)
$
$
$
Matching funds
Type-
$
CON subtotal
$
I $
$
I I This application is not requesting funds for the CON phase
Non -Infrastructure
(NI)
Non -Infrastructure
(NI)
$
$
$
Matching funds
Type-
$
NI subtotal
$
$
$
This application is not requesting funds for a NI phase
Grand Total $
ATP work tvae If applicable
�$
$
Enter Estimated ATP fund amount
Request for funding a Plan
$
Request for Safe Routes to Schools Infrastructure work
$
Request for Safe Routes to Schools Non -Infrastructure work
$
Request for other Non -Infrastructure work
$
Request for Disadvantage Community work
$
Request for Recreational Trails work
$
All Non-ATP fund types on this project
fund amount
$
2/28/2014 7:44 AM
Page 14 of 18
2/28/2014
DRAFT
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
Project name:
VI. INFRASTRUCTURE SCHEDULE INFORMATION
Project Approval & Environmental Doc (PA & ED)
i
PA & ED Allocation
Project Initiation document Approved (or Field review/PES submittal)
Begin Environmental (PA & ED) Phase
Circulate Draft Environmental Document (for EIS or FONSI)
PE Authorization
Environmental Document Type: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
L_I CE LAND/MND EIR
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
CE i —j EA/FONSI j _� EIS
I I
Draft Project Report (for EIS or FONSI)
End Environmental Phase (PA&ED Milestone)
Plans, Specifications & Estimate (PS&E)
PS&E Allocation
Begin Design (PS&E) Phase
End Design Phase (Ready to List or Advertise)
Right of Way (ROW)
ROW Allocation
Begin ROW Phase
End of ROW Phase (ROW Certification Milestone)
Construction (CON)
CON Allocation
Begin CON Phase (Contract Award Milestone)
End CON Phase (Contract Acceptance Milestone)
Closeout
Begin Closeout Phase
End Closeout Phase (Final Report of Expenditures)
ROW Authorization
CON Authorization
Proposed Date
L
2/28/2014 7:44 AM Page 15 of 18
2/28/2014
i
DRAFT
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
Project name:
Start Date
VI. NON -INFRASTRUCTURE SCHEDULE INFORMATION
End Date
Deliverables
2/28/2014 7:44 AM
Page 16 of 18
2/28/2014
DRAFT 4
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
Project name:
VII. APPLICATION SIGNATURES
Applicant: The undersigned affirms that the statements contained in the application package are true and
complete to the best of their knowledge.
Signature:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Phone:
e-mail:
Local Agency Official (City Engineer or Public Works Director): The undersigned affirms that the statements
contained in the application package are true and complete to the best of their knowledge.
Signature:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Phone:
e-mail:
School Official: The undersigned affirms that the school(s) benefited by this application is not on a school
closure list.
Signature: Date:
Name: Phone:
Title: e-mail:
Person to contact for questions:
Name: Phone:
Title: e-mail:
Ca!trans District Traffic Operations Office Approval
If the application's project proposes improvements on a freeway or state highway that affects the safety or
operations of the facility, it is required that the proposed improvements be reviewed by the district traffic
operations office and either a letter of support from the traffic operations office be attached (_) or the signature of
the traffic personnel be secured below.
Signature: Date:
Name: Phone:
Title: e-mail:
2/28/2014 7:44 AM Page 17 of 18
2/28/2014
DRAFT
ATP Cycle 1 Application Form
Project name:
VIII. APPLICATION ATTACHMENTS
Check all attachments included with this application.
Completed Project Programming Request Template (PPR)- REQUIRED
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/transprog/ocip.htm
Vicinity/Location Map- REQUIRED for all IF Projects
- North Arrow
- Label street names and highway route numbers
Photos and/or Video of Existing Location- REQUIRED for all IF Projects
Minimum of one labeled color photo of the existing project location
Minimum photo size 3 x 5 inches
Optional video and/or time-lapse
Preliminary Plans- REQUIRED for Construction phase only
Must include a north arrow
Label the scale of the drawing
Typical Cross sections where applicable with property or right-of-way lines
- Label street names, highway route numbers and easements
Detailed Engineer's Estimate- REQUIRED for Construction phase only
Estimate must be true and accurate. Applicant is responsible for verifying costs prior to
submittal
Must show a breakdown of all bid items by unit and cost. Lump Sum may only be used if that
is how the item will be bid.
Must show all items that are eligible for ATP funding
- Contingency is limited to 10% of funds being requested
- Evaluation required under the ATP guidelines is not a reimbursable item
Maintenance Agreement- If entity other than the applicant will be maintaining the project after
completion
Letters of Support from Caltrans (Required for projects on the State Highway System(SHS))
Digtal copy of or an online link to an approved plan (bicycle, pedestrian, safe routes to school, active
transportation, general, recreation, trails, city/county or regional master plan(s), technical studies,
and/or environmental studies (with environmental commitment record or list of mitigation measures),
if applicable. Include/highlight portions that are applicable to the proposed project.
Documentation of the public participation process (required)
Additional documentation, letters of support, etc (optional)
2/28/2014 7:44 AM Page 18 of 18
-%-rr* I
DRAFT
ATP 10 Points -Additional Criteria for MPO Regional Share
Points Criteria
3 Consistency with RTP/FTIP andlor multicounty bike/trail plans
2 Connectivity or Destinations Served - Linking neighborhoods,
shopping, schools, etc.
2 lntermodal Access - Linking bike/ped facility with other
modes, e.g. transit, rail
t Consistency with Subregional plans
1 Inclusion in General Plan/City Bike Plan/School District,
partnering with other agencies
1 Safety: description of how project will enhance or
improve safety of existing facility, or description of safety
benefits project will provide to a new facility
10 Total
Points can be applied for each category the project falls under.
S1N3WNH3A0930NOI1VIDOSSV :>
VIN2J0311d� N2J3HISIOS
-bTOZ Iu46T kie.naga�
w�
tIN76A/A1W4elUtoL ••
MOS
suaea6oad lepodS uopepodsue.u. annay '.ia6euew
uosdar qe.ie5
6impunj (div)
werthaid uonevodsueij, aAnay
aldoad I!W +8 L1111111selin 1.61.
sanw •bs 000`8E saRunoo g
uoReziue6a0 bt.ijuueld uemodoa}aW
-a5ueap.
ou piewe8 ues
sIuat.UuaDn09
10 uoalfelDossV esaaaomea uaalanos
" 0 z i p e W p @ p a d x a
u o p d o p e ' b l j ) u o i s s i v a u i o D u o p . p 4 J o d s u e a l
e i v a o n e D A q p a d o i a n a p s a u p p i n 6 w e a 6 o a d
s w e a 6 o a d a w l s
p u e l e J a p a j , b u q . s i x a w a g b u p u n i . s a l , e p i i o s u o j
T O T I I ! 9 A p c i w a s s v p u e 6 6 I I ! 9 a 4 e u a S A c l P l E a 0
5 u N q
p u e & p p m a l o u a o a d u a e a 6 o a d a p i n n a i e i s n n a N
( c l i V ) w e a b o a d u o p p 4 a o d s u p a l a n P d
s3;nin3 meuiyisns 2 spiR,.01. • ' •,,',`;7. Sliii:111`..!!:.!0:1 .-.::?iiiVISII.S
tiVid NOI1V1HOdSNVE1Vh1019321
di
HOZ-Z1,01
luelldwop
Vav ale 4eLp. svmaps 4o Jaciwnu at.p. S@SeaIDUI
04 SUOp@UUOD S@AaldWI
alp/Sop JO 5upilem
Aq sauw E uet.n. ssal scl!..14 112 40 EtZ 40 1205 Joj. saN-14S
bupflem pue buqoAoq Jo aiesqs apow alliwwoo saseaoui
S@
W
000IZT AP2@u 04 00E$ wag. sauw Aeimavq SDS2aJDUI
SEN Pue
mou uaannlaq uonewdsuaii annoy Jo4 bupury. saidpi
>K. . t
ueid uo!lei.JodsueJi annoy letio!bai
spa[oad 4o uinapads pewq e punk
sapunwuaoD pabe4uenpesp s4ijauaq aansu]
4saqo pooqpiND
5upnpal Aq bu!pniDu! 'upjeay Drind aDupuu�
(SLR 9S off. luensand) suapnpaa sp6 asnoquaaa6
anaipe o4 sapua6e ieuqbai Aq s4aoi4a aDuenpy
*pow pug A4aj.es uopeiJodsuean anpe aseamI
5upilem pug 5upflq Aq apeua sdia4 aseanuI
SI209 dB/
sapAD
6uipun4 aan4n.4 aoj. paainbaa sued •
Apo saniunuauao3 pa6pluenpesia •
sued uonpiaodsupal anpoy
aanpna4saij.ui-uou+ aanpna4spguI
Apo sirDa[oad pue 1.ond .
4uawaDa0.j.ua
luawabamoiva 'uopempi .
sI.DaCoad aanpnaqseapI-uoN
uoponai.sum pue u6isap 'buiuu2ld
spa[oad aamonalspijuI
dpuni. nog( ue3 lam
uopezpoLpneaj Tz-dekru! waibaid sannewally
uopeliodsuaa o4 4uawIlwwoD 4=1 awes sawnssy*
121-10PEN
paps
a4es Aq
papAaid abewi
%0T
uompciwoo
iamb
ugclirl S
%Uri
suompdwoo-----
OdIN
ueqin aBiei
%09
uompdwoo
alcgivialeTS
Ouipuni Jo veal(' amp)
PIOZ u! Palma -me aq illm 1/1109E$
unnopleaJg 5upund -
leuon.eN imps
olsalnoH ales
papnaid a0ewi
uouiledwoj apimaiels u! Ajdde c algrAte safflunwatoo
sawunwwoo paeweApes!p
ui 2upueid Jai xew ohg
senlunwwoo
paeluenpesna Joj ulw %ge
sweaoid einiorulseliu!
-uou ioi uRu vq-Ez$ goyim Jo
sparoid sms Jol Lijui iNeLS
%OS
uomedwoo
aPPAeleTS
u opi.@c1 w op a p!AfG4245
Regional Competitions
25% min for
disadvantaged
communities
5% max for planning
in disadvantaged
communities
$144M
Large Urban
MPS?
Competitions
40%
*Communities in urban regions with populations greater than
200,4000 eligible for Large MPO Competitions
SCAG Regional Competition = fv$76 M
Image provided by
Safe Routes to
School National
Partnership
*Assumes same level of commitment to Transportation Alternatives program
in Map-21 Reauthorization
suon.qadwoD Lpoq ao4 uopeoiidde aup
uoq.naduaoD leuo!bal ui paiapsuop aq IHAA
uoppaduaoD apinnal.els ui papaps you spa[oad
TZ Aeki-Tz uppW :uado spa[oad a94. Iles sues.4123
spaCoad ao4 1123
(letio!Esai + a4e4s) PaNwo3
spa[oad Hall_ leuopeanai a04 Alcides
Aew suopeziue6ao 4dwaxa-xel. 4goaduou a4eniad
sagial ueDiaau.iy
anppN pazpboDai-Alialapj :s4u@wwanop ��gial
spialsip paps aoj. sloops DiIgnd
saiaua6p �isu�al
sapua6y awlS ao leuo!bali lepoi
slueDgddy aigi6il3
0 to 25 points
-5 to 0 points
40 to 0 points
Scoring Criteria
Pr
Potential for increased walking and bicycling, especially among students.
Potential for reducing fatalities, injuries, and potential safety hazards for pedestrians
and bicyclists.
Public Participation and Planning, i.e. noticed meetings and consultation with local
stakeholders to identify the proposed project.
Cost effectiveness, i.e. maximizing the safety and mobility benefit relative to the
total project cost.
Improve public health by focusing on populations with high risk factors for health
issues
Benefit to disadvantaged communities.
Points deducted if the Conservation Corps* is not consulted to partner on the project
construction
Points deducted if the applicant has poor performance on past Ca!trans grants
loomr:
-tiogoiamsuo3 .10f ADAitiS lanai-pootpocitirnau D vumns .1UO3.fiddD alp 'plop
Jo N3Dif D anp RA011113 Dpalf.13 NI paw you s'aop Aijunanuo3 pabovoAposlp o
Tare pofaid ui sluapms
tootps aql sillaual p9fald owo!pu! Isnw amseow OUisr! squeoliddv,
'vAtcixTarpr.o4 :*sieew ao!Jd pampa! Jo aall Joj ample'
aye 43afaid ai44 ut slueprils looLps Dinnd Jo %a. ;sea! 4v .€
IIZAUX[71Arijci : 10 01. U9 aiDsoJ!Au3ieD
uo paseq saJoos wyr do; atp u! paimualzt! ease uv -
wijarTpTplob-Dsn-T :elep snsueo 4se4e! uo paseq ue!pew appa4e4s
eql. Jo %08 ueql ssal s! awoDur plogasnoil ueipew s,Aliunatwoo
waugap
„ki!unwwo3 pabeiruenpes!a„ si moH
awo3u1 ppLIGSCIOE-f uelpaA %as ,s
awo3u1 plogasnoH ucrpapi %02
awooui plotiosnoi4 uerPalN zi,az
D!..14@k1 @LUODUI
iiihrdatuelpaN :san!unwwco pabequenpesKi
Mat a
" s o e D u o i s s i u a o - o n . e l a o d s u p a l
/ q u n o j j o u o p e p u a u a u a o D a a u o p a s e q ' E 1 ! - I d V
u i p e a d d e 4 d o p e o 4 p u n o 3 l e s u o ! 5 @ 2 1 9 V D S
S U O I S S I I . U l , U O i
U 0 1 l 2 L i O C I S U a 1 l A l U t l O 3 2 1 l l l . U O a } a D U a . I . I n J U O J U I L ' l g Q .
s l u a u a u a a n o 2 i e u o p a p u e i e D o i A q p a l d o p e
s u e d } u a l s i s u o p a a e l a p s p a f o a d a z p i a o i a d .
A l i n b a 3 i y d e a 0 o a 2 a a p i s u o j .
e i a a ��i a �� u o p a l a s 1 . 3 a f o a d u o s u e n i e D p u e ` u o i s s i v a u a o p
a y e ` u o i s s i v a u a o 3 u o i l e l a o d s u e n . A } u n o o a i p y w M l i n s u o 3 .
: 4 s n w D V D S 1 6 6 O S a a d
i a t i ��t i n w + ' m : a - : ��r m e K w ����Y i s r + a ����+ t a + s w ��. , a w * w ��w * ��q ��G
u o p p a d u a o 3 i e s u o ! b a j
D V D S s u o p e a a p i s u o D l e u o P I P P V
sparaid we..iEsaid iesuo!bal sviope DID .19qUIDAON
uon.epulawwmai waibaid
leuo!baJ sanaidde puno3 leijo!bali DVDS Jaquml.daS
waibad
auk jo suop_iod apAna424s s4clopes DID OZ Isn6nv
sparaid -104 Heo p@upwoj T.z A EA-7.7 L13-02Eil
mcwoj
suojpe UOISSILULLIC2) upgepodsueg ifiunoj veadde
leuo!bai sanaidde punco ieuo!ba DVDS— E Hadv
saupprip
waibaid uon.q.Jodsuati annoy s4dope LIDJelAI
sa42a Aa>1
66 9S
uq4e3!iddbijea0 did
sauPpinDliea0 dltl
Mil 'dld/sw ea Goad/nob • eO'34 23'MMM
DID
W.I. 6uipunj)
xdse• uone4aodsuealanpid jsa6ed/swea6oad/no6°2D'6L'DS'MMM
POuaaa.}u0.7-oapi�—saDwp ieuoi6a`apu.}p
uIeW DbDS) 00:T-00:6't7 uDaeW .s.Paloada4i�.7a.113Pue
siesodoad inissaoons duuedaad d1 y :Aepsanl xoqpol J`dJS
uoi6ab 9vos
u0q2Wa04uI aaoW
nod• eD•9e3s@ uosd uaoql
uosduaolll ueld
na•eD•9eDs@uosdaf
uosdaf gales
AGENDA ITEM 9
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
March 17, 2014
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director
SUBJECT:
Office of Traffic Safety Grant — County of Riverside
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Support the Office of Traffic Safety application for Riverside County to develop a countywide
traffic record system.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The County of Riverside is exploring a grant project with the State Office of Traffic Safety.
The proposed project is to develop a countywide traffic record system that will collect traffic
collision data from all cities and the county (unincorporated areas), excluding collisions on
state highways, and allow sharing of data to facilitate decision -making in directing and
prioritizing limited resources for safety improvements to reduce fatalities, injuries and property
damages. The countywide data base will also allow Riverside County and cities the ability to
compare regional issues and trends to consider possible solutions that require coordination
among agencies. Additional features will be included in the new countywide system to
provide the ability to create an agency model of roadway classifications, speed limits,
intersection controls, and traffic volume data. The ability for the system to produce collision
rates along with average collision rates by road class and intersection control will provide
additional tools for agency use. In addition, the records from the countywide system will be
available to be uploaded to a state level database for use by the Office of Traffic Safety if so
desired in the future.
LualsXs sisiquuy
pug ulpodaw uoisijjop apinnXTunop
Xluno3 opIsnAIN
-apimklunoo sp.Tooai Joj sop.XIeue um oi. (suoIss!w.lad tp!m)
JO Xouafe .Tlatp Joj sogiquue uni of ssaooe aim! !pm saiouage AnTedlopied Iiv
-(Ieuopclo) k aies 3IiseTZ Jo aotijo
am Te .Tan.Tas E of sIseq kmaam e uo XIleogewolne papeoldn aq IITm spiooaN
-sopkteue pue k.nua -elep `spodai &I-R Tm ui asn Joj .ouafy °Nod pue
Tuatuvedau fupaauOug o jjali !Dog Joj tualsks asegvira uotsmoD amp
suots.Tan 1.11030.z ISOM all Jo asuaoil 31is E Lglm papino.Td aq !Iron Xoua�E t,1oEg
-.Tan.Tas .T31.1133 um) a.moas am uo palms -elep
Tsutefe sogigeue uoistlloo Joj asemuos sogkteuv JopuaA asn Ilim satoua y
-Jaluao
%el) a.rnoas -e of npu klana papeoldn Xlleop-emome aq Iitrn spiooai uoisTlloD
-JopuaA kq paialua
elep .To iouafe goua Te alnpow knug ma uoIsmoD atp on!! /Woo Neil
!nag p0.T011.10-Flap zo saiouafE aoTlod kq paonpo.Td aq [um spoda.T uoIsmoD
LIOgdpos2Q Lua st�s
SZO
spzoaa�
spaoaaa
Agencies — Method of Data Capture
Report Writing by PD Electronically
Lake Elsinore, Menifee, Moreno Valley, Palm Springs, Perris, San Jacinto, Temecula, Wildomar
Report Writing by PD Combined with Data Entry by Vendor
Corona, Coachella, Eastvale, Hemet, Indian Wells, Indio, Jurupa Valley, La Quinta, Murrieta, Norco, Palm Desert, Rancho
Mirage
Data Entry by TE
Riverside County (hard copy and proposed electronic import from CHP)
City of Riverside (propose PD writing reports electronically)
To Be Determined (}propose data entry by TE and/or report writing, by PD_1
Cathedral City, Banning, Beaumont, Blythe, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Desert Hot Springs
ou!moIA dad podaw uoisiijoj .
spodaw pug sai.zan6 .
Oupziduw SIJ Puy qpug apooD .
saiew uotsiliop papadxj Jo 30EJ3nV .
saLunion Tinujap Imm
suoileu2isap iaijuoj doffs ssujp puow .
salvw uoisijjop .
sommd sIsiquiv puopIppy
AGENDA ITEM 10
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 10.
AGENDA ITEM Zi
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 11.