Loading...
05 May 20, 2013 Technical Advisory CommitteeCOMM-TAC-00030 TIME: DATE: LOCATION: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda. 10:00 a.m. May 20, 2013 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor Riverside, CA 92501 In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact the Riverside County Transportation Commission at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Self -Introductions 3. Approval of April 15, 2013 Minutes 4. Public Comments (This is for comments on items not listed on agenda. Comments relating to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is before the Committee.) 5. STP Rehabilitation Call for Projects — Update on Programming Status (Attachment) 6. Prop 1B SLPP and TCIF Project Allocation Update (Attachment) 7. MAP-21 Buy America (Attachment) 8. 2013 US DOT 2013 TIGER Discretionary Grant Program (Verbal Presentation) 9. Development of Multi -funding Call for Projects — April 30th TAC Subcommittee Meeting Summary (Attachment) 10. FTIP Update (Attachment) 11. Local Assistance Update (Verbal Presentation) 12. May Commission Meeting Highlights (Verbal Presentation) Technical Advisory Committee Meeting May 20, 2013 Page 2 13. Other Business - Measure A CIP Submittals (Verbal Presentation) - SB 821 Call for Project Submittal Summary (Verbal Presentation) 14. Adjournment (The next meeting will be July 15, 2013 in Beaumont.) "' • AGENCY BANNING BEAUMONT BLYTHE TECHNICAL AD.RY COMMITTEE May 20, 2013 TAC MEMBER I AL"("ERNATE DUANE BURK Kahono Oei PRINT NAME Director of Public Works KISHEN PRATHIVADI Assistant Director of Public Works DAVID LANE City Manager -----r . Kevin Hughes - --------__ ___, _____________ _ MIKE SHOBERG I Allyn Waggle CVAG Transportation Program Manager Deputy Director ·-----------+-------CALIMESA MICHAEL THORNTON City Engineer Bob French Public Works Director rvtiw ~ SIGNATURE >-----------~ -----" ------CAL TRANS SEAN YEUNG Acting District Local Assistance Engineer 1William Mosby----~-Depu~ Director of ~lanning -I Jeo~ . 'fe~ ~ -·-. -\_, J,~~:J ----i -F lF CANYON LAKE HABIB MOTLAGH City Engineer CATHEDRAL CITY I BILL SIMONS Interim City Engineer --COACHELLA JONATHAN HOY City Engineer -· Maritza Martinez Interim Public Works Director CORONA KIP FIELD Robert Morin ---11 ---DESERT HOT SPRINGS Acting Public Works Director _ _ _ ~rincipal Civil Engineer HAL GOLDENBERG Director of Public Works i 1?-\ \ ., .s f"I·•-( .... '\,.(_ 5· -j tJ vt r... k-L1A;.., ~ rvt.~N • • EASTVALE HEMET INDIAN WELLS INDIO JURUPA VALLEY LA QUINTA LAKE ELSINORE MENIFEE TECHNICAL AD.RY COMMITTEE May 20, 2013 GEORGE ALVAREZ City Engineer JORGE BIAGIONI I Victor Monz Engineering Director/City Engineer Principal Engineer &cir,:;~ A Iva-I" e ---+---IKEN BELL I Bondie Baker Interim Public Works Director Assistant Engineer II I tf<.li).11"" (:;)l 1, \/ rJ D ' JJ<j--fle ---t GRANT EKLUND Tom Rafferty rublic Works Director/City Engineer Principal Ci~I Engineer ROY STEPHENSON Mike Myers I Public Works Director/City Engineer :Assistant City Engineer i TIMOTHY JONASSON t Bryan McKinney 11-v.-j ~!)o-Public Works Director/City Engineer I Principal Engineer __J .. ... . KEN SEUMALO · 'City Engineer I iJONATHAN SMITH . Acting City Engineer i 'Robert Johnson Interim City Manager -J -=-r== -·-1:· --MORENO VALLEY AHMAD ANSARI I Jo~i..i ~ffil [Prem Kumar --. ~-. ,-----I Deputy Pu~lic Wo~ks Director/ 'I rH f-1AD AN 5 MURRIETA NORCO Public Works Director/City Engineer BOB MOEHLING Engineering Manager BILL THOMPSON Director of Public Works Assistant City Engineer I IJim Holsten Assistant City Manager ! Lori Askew Sr. Engineer ~en' A-sKeAU • • PALM DESERT PALM SPRINGS PERRIS ---RT A BO CHEN City Engineer DAVE BARAKIAN Director of Public Works/ City Engineer HABIB MOTLAGH City Engineer GORDON ROBINSON Director of Planning TECHNICAL AD.RY COMMITTEE May 20, 2013 Mark Diercks Transportation Engineer Savat Khamphou jtt/t:/ Lorelle Moe-Luna Senior Planner _ _, M-1 ~CM _J_ _________,,_Wadr---+-----------' ' RANCHO MIRAGE 1 BR.ucE HARRY 11 smE:l1os Director of Public Works City Engineer ~~C-3L-~"\ RIVERSIDE TOM BOYD Public Works Director RIVERSIDE COUNTY I JUAN PEREZ SAN JACINTO Director of Transportation HABIB MOTLAGH City Engineer Farshid Mohammadi Engineering Manager ff" 1 Patty Romo • Deputy DireclDr ofTran:rtation I __ i -• ~ y U/ t-+-21 i~~/ /I SUNLINE JOEFORGIARINI ---_-_ -------r---TEMECULA 'WILDOMAR 1 DireclDr of Transit Planning 1 _ __ _ I _____ _ GREG BUTLER t:mer Attar _ Director of Public Works ,Principal Engineer I (Oee0, TIM D'ZMURA Director of Public Works and City Engineer fuTLe~_ Dan York City Engineer i+;rsGJ -1-WR COG RUTHANNE TAYLOR-BERGER Deputy Executive Director Donna Dean Program Manager ~~v~ • . • TECHNICAL AD.RY COMMITTEE • May 20, 2013 AGENCY NAME TELEPHONE OR E-MAIL ~~ .---·-··J--.u .. ~ \ r, CllA Gt.it tad. D. I q ~I . ','if 1 · I '1! 3 r-rpc 1c A°'k'Yi fJq/p.z . , , . , 7-tb) ---f..(, TC I tr"-Oe)~\-c_ ti f I for;~ . R..ill4'L.~1'k._ ~~ I ~ dJ,f._J/_____ rnulf e Y'_c._+LmC(. .. "°"r------~l1t~Vt5 ----um -----! \JJ : u ;6.\M H t-A Os b H _{__ q 04) 'S ~ ~ ~ +r + 7 nn , ::J..:Pr~pA.VA LltZ.y ~St-~JZ.-t-"ll-</ I , _ _ M_c._~llt. \fv\ ~ e:ss i [ ... -~~~ C..f".,. I J "1V'vf~"~ \l~ · ~~ _l=~ VAU£Y - _ 1 M;;~-:::~ 1H;;~l:~~::AL~::~~tM:tnl·~ 11 1 _'(RlS<"l \<u.~ ~,vv\c@ l\A.oV~ I ·-· J-··---+ MINUTES TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Monday, April 15, 2013 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was called to order at 10:05 a.m. at the Riverside County Transportation Commission, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA. 2. SELF -INTRODUCTIONS Members Present: George Alvarez, City of Eastvale Dave Barakian, City of Palm Springs Greg Butler, City of Temecula Donna Dean, WRCOG Mike Diercks, City of Palm Desert Grant Eklund, City of Indio Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage Jonathan Hoy, City of Coachella Prem Kumar, City of Moreno Valley Bob Moehling, City of Murrieta Habib Motlagh, Cities of Canyon Lake, Perris and San Jacinto Kahono Oei, City of Banning Patty Romo, County of Riverside Ken Seumalo, City of Lake Elsinore Bill Simons, City of Cathedral City Jonathan Smith, City of Menifee Roy Stephenson, City of Jurupa Valley Michael Thornton, City of Calimesa Allyn Waggle, CVAG Others Present: Grace Alvarez, RCTC Eric DeHate, RCTC Shirley Gooding, RCTC Jillian Guizado Eric Lewis, City of Moreno Valley Sylvester Lin, Caltrans District 8 Shirley Medina, RCTC Roy Null, County of Riverside Technical Advisory Committee Meeting April 15, 2013 Page 2 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes were approved as submitted Abstain: Dave Barakian 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. 5. DRAFT STP REHABILITATION CALL FOR PROJECTS — SUMMARY AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Shirley Medina, RCTC, provided an updated listing of Federal Surface Transportation Rehabilitation Call for Projects — Programming Recommendations and said it will be presented to RCTC's Budget & Implementation Committee April 22 and then to the Commission May 8. She stated that RCTC received 21 projects totaling about $12 million for rehabilitation projects. She further stated that some agencies have not yet submitted their projects, e.g. Eastvale that is still working with Caltrans to determine the federal classification lane miles, which is currently being reviewed. Once Eastvale submits its project, the lane miles will be incorporated into the calculation on the listing, which will show a reduction on the county side. Coachella is also expected to submit a project. Ms. Medina said there were no projects received from Blythe, Calimesa, Indian Wells, Lake Elsinore, Norco, or Palm Desert. If agencies do not submit projects, the funding could be redistributed to other agencies. 6. DEVELOPMENT OF MULTI -FUNDING CALL FOR PROJECTS (SUMMARY OF ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE CALL) Shirley Medina provided her staff report and said staff is working out a combination call for projects using MAP-21 funding — Congestion Mitigation Air Quality funds, Surface Transportation Program funds, as well as Western Riverside County Measure A Regional Arterial funds, totaling about $130 million. She said that priority will be given to projects that are ready for construction. She briefly described the general assumptions for the call for projects, criteria for the call, the schedule, and FTIP programming, and clarified that CVAG will conduct its own call for projects for CMAQ funds apportioned to the Salton Sea Air Basin. State funding may also be available from the upcoming 2014 STIP. She also stated that she expects to convene the first subcommittee meeting in April. 7. OBLIGATION PLAN FOR THE REMAINING FFY 2012-13 PROJECTS Grace Alvarez, RCTC, reported that RCTC continues to monitor the progress of the federal obligations programmed for FFY 2012/13, even though the established target date of April 1 has passed. She reminded the TAC that staff first presented the TAC with the draft FFY 2012/13 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting April 15, 2013 Page 3 obligation plan in September 2012 and since then staff has updated the plan on an ongoing basis and presented it at TAC meetings. She further reported that the obligation plan attached to the staff report includes 14 projects totaling $96.6 M, and that the obligation plan was actually updated subsequent to the mailing of the TAC agenda, since staff found out that the CMAQ funds for the Perris Valley Line were obligated and transferred to the Federal Transit Administration where they will be combined with other federal transit administration funds. The number of remaining projects in the obligation plan for FY 2012/13 is now 13 for a combined CMAQ, STP total of $64.5 M. The Perris Valley Line increased federal obligations from three to four projects with a total combined STP and CMAQ obligation year-to-date of $41.1 M. Staff encouraged the agencies listed in the obligation plan to move forward with their projects as soon as possible to make sure Caltrans has enough obligation authority to approve the funding in FY 2012/13. RCTC has enough obligation authority to obligate the remaining projects thanks to the apportionment/obligation authority loans that have been repaid to RCTC in this fiscal year. Ms. Alvarez thanked the TAC for its active participation in keeping the obligation plan updated and for responses to our fundtrack project milestone reports of February. She said the project milestone report updates help to maintain the obligation plan up-to-date and it also allows the programming staff to make the necessary updates in the FTIP to ensure projects are correctly reflected in this program document for when the agencies are ready to obligate the funding for the projects. 8. FTIP UPDATE Eric DeHate, RCTC, presented an update to the 2013 FTIP. Currently, SCAG has processed eight amendments to the 2013 FTIP encompassing four formal amendments, three administrative modifications, and one RTP consistency amendment. He further stated that RCTC has participated in seven out of the eight amendments submitted totaling changes to 131 projects. The most recently submitted amendment to SCAG was administrative modification No. 8, which entailed changes to 17 projects. He pointed out that attached to his staff report is the amendment log that identifies each amendment, when it was due to RCTC, when it was submitted the SCAG, the anticipated approval, and when it was approved. At the February 3, 2013 TAC meeting, a suggestion was made to add an anticipated approval column. For projects that need amending in order to submit RFAs to Caltrans, the anticipate date of approval should give the TAC members a good working estimate for their submissions. 9. LOCAL ASSISTANCE UPDATE Sylvester Lin, Caltrans District 8, stated that he will be glad to take questions to Sean Yeung upon his return to the local assistance office. He recommended e-mailing Sean Yeung if any agencies have urgent matters. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting April 15, 2013 Page 4 Ms. Medina requested that Caltrans provide a local assistance staff assignment listing to assist in determining who to call for particular issues. 10. APRIL COMMISSION MEETING HIGHLIGHTS Shirley Medina reported that Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer, RCTC, presented a financial report on the State Route 91 CIP plan of finance. She offered to forward Ms. Trevino's PowerPoint presentation to anyone who is interested. The 2013 specialized transit call for projects and Measure A specialized transit grant awards were approved. Caltrans provided an update on the SR 91 HOV project for downtown Riverside. It is expected to be delayed about a year. In response to a question about the Perris Valley Line, Ms. Medina stated that there are still some areas that need to be reviewed in the environmental document to address some concerns raised in the lawsuit. There is no indication of the full impact on the schedule. The FTA still has to give its final approval. 11. OTHER BUSINESS SB 821 CALL FOR PROJECTS Jillian Guizado, RCTC, reminded the TAC that the SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program call for projects has been released. The projects are due May 16, 2:00 p.m. She offered assistance in completing the applications. She also reminded the TAC that she is seeking three TAC members who are not submitting projects to sit on the evaluation committee. The evaluations are scheduled for Wednesday, May 29, from 8:00 to about 4:00. at which time proposals will be presented and the evaluation committee has an opportunity to ask questions about the projects. 12. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee, the meeting adjourned at approximately 10:40 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Shirley Medina Programming and Planning Manager AGENDA ITEM 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: May 20, 2013 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manger SUBJECT: 2013 STP Rehabilitation Call for Projects STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the TAC to receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the May 8, 2013 Commission meeting, the Commission approved programming all projects submitted by the April 1st deadline (attached). Additional submittals were received and will be forwarded to the June Commission for programming approval. There are six (6) agencies that have not submitted projects to date: Beaumont Blythe Coachella Indian Wells Lake Elsinore Norco We have contacted the agencies to submit projects by May 17, 2013 in order to include the projects in our June Commission agenda. The approximate total for the 6 agencies if left unprogrammed is just over $1 million. If the agencies do not submit projects, staff will look at either extending the deadline or redistributing the funds. RIV031223 - GROUPED PROJECT LISTING FOR RCTC'S PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION ON THE LOCAL ROADS SYSTEM 1 AGENCY PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PROJECT LIMITS FEDERAL FUNDS (STPL) $(000's) LOCAL FUNDS $(000's) TOTAL PROJECT COST Banning Ramsey St. Pavement Rehab Hargrave St. to east end of city limits $182 $295 $477 Canyon Lake Railroad Canyon Rd. Pavement Rehab Railroad Rd. Canyon from Goetz Rd. to Lake Elsinore city limits $37 $5 $42 Cathedral City East Palm Canyon Dr. Rehab East Palm Canyon Dr. (former Hwy 111) from the west city limits (Golf Club Dr) to 550 ft. west of Canyon Plaza Dr.. & from Melrose St. to the east city limits.$337 $45 $382 Corona Ontario Ave Pavement Rehab Ontario Ave. btwn California Ave. and Magnolia Ave.$832 $108 $940 Desert Hot Springs Hacienda Ave & Mission Lakes Blvd. Surface Rehab Hacienda Ave from Avenida La Vista to Long Canyon Rd.; Hacienda Ave. from Palm Dr. to Miracle Hill Rd.; and Mission Lakes Blvd. from Santa Cruz Rd. To Verbena Dr.$182 $24 $206 Hemet Gilbert St. Pavement Rehab Gilbert St. from Acacia Ave to Stetson Ave.$443 $75 $518 Indio Old Hwy 111 Pavement Reconstruction Old Hwy 111 from Rubidoux St. to Oasis St. $477 $991 $1,468 Jurupa Valley Van Buren Blvd. Pavement Rehab Van Buren Blvd., from Limonite Ave. to 56th St.$321 $449 $770 La Quinta Washington St. Improvements Washington St. from Calle Tampico to Ave. 52 $250 $32 $282 Menifee Newport Rd. Pavement Rehab Newport Rd. from Bradley Rd. to Murrieta Rd.$323 $323 $646 Moreno Valley Frederick St. and Elsworth St. Pavement Rehab Frederick ST. from Sunnymead Blvd. to Alessandro and Elsworth St. from Cactus Ave. to Business Center Dr.$1,084 $140 $1,224 Murrieta Jefferson Ave. Pavement Rehab Jefferson Ave. from Date St to Murrieta Hot Springs Rd.$593 $77 $670 Palm Springs Ramon Rd. Pavement Rehab Ramon Rd. from west of Sunrise Way to east of Compadre Rd.$396 $51 $447 RIV031223 - GROUPED PROJECT LISTING FOR RCTC'S PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION ON THE LOCAL ROADS SYSTEM 2 AGENCY PROJECT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PROJECT LIMITS FEDERAL FUNDS (STPL) $(000's) LOCAL FUNDS $(000's) TOTAL PROJECT COST Perris Redlands Ave. Pavement Rehab Rider St. to San Jacinto Ave.$313 $50 $363 Rancho Mirage Hwy 111 Pavement Rehab Bob Hope Dr. to Parkview Dr.$162 $355 $517 Riverside Indiana Ave. Pavement Rehab Indiana Ave. from Vallejo St. to Auto Center Dr.$1,810 $240 $2,050 *Riverside County Rancho California Rd. Pavement Rehab De Luz Rd. to Temecula city limits $2,723 $353 $3,076 *Riverside County 62nd Street Pavement Rehab Jackson St. to Harrison St.$605 $79 $684 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ave Pavement Rehab San Jacinto Ave. from Seventh St. to Menlo Ave.290 100 390 Temecula Winchester Rd. Pavement Rehab Winchester Rd. from Jefferson Ave. to Ynez Rd.$646 $530 $1,176 Wildomar Clinton Keith Rd Slurry Seal Clinton Keith Rd. from Stable Lns. To George Ave.$136 $18 $154 Total $12,142 $4,340 $16,482 * - Amounts for Riverside County will be adjusted as a result of information regarding city of Eastvale's Federal Functional Classification System lane miles. AGENDA ITEM 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: May 20, 2013 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager SUBJECT: Proposition 1 B State -Local Partnership Program (SLPP) Formula STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At its March, July, and September 2012 meeting, the Commission approved nine projects totaling $58,941,000 for SLPP formula funds. SLPP funding must be allocated by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) on or by its June 11, 2013 meeting. SLPP funded projects that remain unallocated after the June meeting will be reallocated by the CTC to other projects within the state. Projects that receive allocations by June must award a construction contract by December 31, 2013. Given these timelines, staff monitored the projects to ensure the deadlines are met. To date, six projects have been allocated. Agency Project SLPP Funds CTC Allocation Date RCTC SR91 CIP $37,173,000 March 11, 2013 Corona Foothill Parkway $ 7,000,000 March 11, 2013 Murrieta I-15/Los Alamos OC $ 2,500,000 January 8, 2013 Palm Desert I-10/Monterey IC $ 2,800,000 May 7, 2013 Indio Monroe Rd Widening $ 1,375,000 October 24, 2012 Indian Wells Hwy 111 Widening $ 1,550,000 March 5, 2013 The following projects are scheduled for allocations at the June 11 CTC meeting: Agency Project SLPP Funds Indio JeffersonNarner Rd. Int. Imp. $2,253,000 County of Riverside Fred Waring Dr. Widening $4,000,000 La Quinta Hwy 111/Washington Int. Widening and Upgrades $ 283,000 RCTC anticipates the remaining three projects to receive allocation at the June 11 meeting. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: May 20, 2013 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager SUBJECT: Proposition 1 B Trade Corridor Improvement Fund (TCIF) Projects — Allocation Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In January 2008, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) allocated $162.7 million in Proposition 1 B funds to Riverside County under the TCIF program to 13 goods movement projects. Since that time, six TCIF projects have been constructed or are under construction and one project was deleted: • Columbia Ave in the city of Riverside — completed • Magnolia Avenue in the city of Riverside — completed • Iowa Avenue in the city of Riverside — under construction • Streeter Avenue in the city of Riverside — under construction • Auto Center Drive in the city of Corona — under construction • I-215/Van Buren Blvd. IC in the county of Riverside — under construction • Third Street in the city of Riverside — deleted As most of the Prop 1 B programs, the TCIF projects must be allocated by the deadline of June 11, 2013 (CTC meeting), and award a construction contracts by December 11, 2013. Several of the completed/allocated TCIF projects incurred project savings estimated at $13,408,334 (including proportionate share of the Colton Crossing savings). To help close the funding gap of the unallocated TCIF projects, staff recommended to the CTC that the project savings be allocated to the following TCIF projects during the months of May and June: • Avenue 56/Airport Blvd. in the Coachella Valley (allocation scheduled for 6/11/13) • Clay Street in northwest Riverside County (allocation scheduled for 6/11/13) • Magnolia Avenue in northwest Riverside County (allocation scheduled for 6/11/13) • Riverside Avenue in the city of Riverside (allocated 5/7/13) The following projects are also scheduled for the June 11 CTC meeting but will not be receiving additional TCIF funding: • Sunset Avenue in the city of Banning • Avenue 52 in the city of Coachella AGENDA ITEM 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: May 20, 2013 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager SUBJECT: MAP-21 Buy America Provision STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the TAC to receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Per MAP-21, all projects that have cleared NEPA are subject to Buy America regardless of how the project is funded. In other words, if a project has cleared NEPA, but will be funded 100% with local funds Buy America still applies in regards to iron and steel materials. FHWA is enforcing this provision differently than it has in the past under SAFETEA-LU. The effective date of the Buy America provision is October 2012. Projects with signed contract agreements prior to October 2012 are not required to implement the provision. Buy America is affecting several projects in Riverside County, the State of California, and across the country. RCTC's 91 CIP project is impacted by the project, and at the May CTC meeting several projects were deferred due to Buy America. More information on how staff is working with Caltrans, other States, transportation organizations, and utility companies on mitigating the impacts of Buy America will be discussed at the TAC meeting. Attachments: Attachment 1: Buy America Flowchart Attachment 2: FHWA's Buy America Q & A Attachment 3: Summary of Buy America Impacts on SR-91 CIP Attachment 4: Southern California Edison Letter Right of Way Certification Process Under MAP-21 Buy America Caltrans Right of Way • April 12, 2013 Does Buy America Affect the Right of Way Certification of My Project? Does the project have a NEPA Document? NO YES Project is Buy America (BA) Applicable Project is not Buy America (BA) Applicable • Process as normal • Certification (Cert) Document must have a Map-21 Buy America Statement in the Utility Section (Mark "Does Not Apply") • Send copies of Certs 1&2 to HQ Does the project require a Utility Agreement? NO O How do I Process a Certification with Buy America Requirements? Does the Cert meet the BA requirements? NO YES 13 Certification is Compliant 1a Certification is Non -Compliant (NC) Certification Requirements for a BA applicable project • Utility Agreement must have a Buy America Clause • Utility Agreement Must be Executed (Signed) • Certification (Cert) Document must have a Buy America Statement in the Utility Section YE Project is Buy America (BA) Applicable but does not require any Utility Agreements • Process as normal • Send copies of Certs 1&2 to HQ Process as normal & send a copy of all certification documents to HQ Cert 1&2 Cert 3w & 3 Terminology will change: • Cert 1= Cert NC • Cert 2 = Cert NC • Cert 3W = Cert NC • Cert 3 = Cert NC Process as normal 1s All Non -Compliant (NC) Certifications will be Signed by the District using new Option Statement for Non - Compliance and Sent to Headquarters What happens to my Non -Compliant Certification? 16 Non -Compliant (NC) Certifications Received in Headquarters, Signed and Returned to District for Standard Distribution v Non -Compliant Certs will be noted in the Funds Request Form CTC Meeting Actions: • NC Projects will not be voted • NC Projects will go on a list of delivered but unallocated projects • NC Projects will be identified with a Buy America Non -Compliant Constraint • NC Projects on the NC list will be considered delivered by the CTC 18 Project will not: • RTL • Have an E76 for construction 23 20 Programming will: • Add Project to Vote List • Reference BA Constraint Programming will: • Add to Director's FHWA List • Reference BA Constraint Goal of delivering NC Projects to the CTC This process will clearly identify projects that are stalled or stopped due to Buy America. This combined effort is our best attempt to encourage a long term solution to this problem instead of a series of workarounds or piecemeal patches. 0 Note: numbers on flow chart elements are meant for reference only and do not denote sequential action. FHWA's Buy America Q and A for Federal -aid Program - Buy America - Contract Admi... Page 1 of 10 1 . r :, 1.11119' �edel al Hl r Ncry A 9Mir7is1r. ane Construction Quality 11 Management & Coordination I Details I Safety I I Materials FHWA > Engineering > Construction > Contract Admin > Bu Search Feedback America > FHWA's Buy America Q and A for Federal -aid Program Construction Guide Fact Sheets Links Memos Publications Research Reviews Technical Advisories Training & Workshops FHWA's Buy America Q and A for Federal -aid Program Background: The FHWA's Buy America policies require a domestic manufacturing process for all steel or iron products that are permanently incorporated in a Federal -aid highway construction project. Title 23 Section 313 and FHWA's regulations in 23 CFR 635.410 provide that the Administrator may issue a waiver if, (1) the application of Buy America provisions would be inconsistent with the public interest or (2) iron and steel materials/products are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities which are of satisfactory quality. The statute and regulations also waive Buy America provisions at the time of contract award if a State elects to include an alternate bidding provision in the project advertisement for foreign and domestic steel and iron products, and the lowest overall bid based on using domestic products is 25 percent more than the lowest overall bid based on using foreign products. Additionally, the FHWA's regulations permit a minimal use of foreign steel and iron in the amount of $2,500 or one -tenth of one percent, whichever is greater, to be used in a Federal -aid project. Below are questions and answers pertaining to Buy America inquiries that have been presented to the Office of Program Administration. The Office of Program Administration is posting these questions and answers so that FHWA Division Offices, State DOTs, and the general public will be aware of the FHWA's responses. Policy Q# 1. Where can I find FHWA's Buy America policies? A# 1. The FHWA Buy America statutory provisions are in 23 U.S.C.313 and the regulatory provisions are in 23 CFR 635.410. For other policy and guidance links, see the Construction Program Guide Q# 2. Can a waiver be granted for the Buy America requirements? A# 2. Yes. Under 23 CFR 635.410 (c)(1)(i), a waiver of Buy America requirements may be granted on a project -by - project basis if: The application of Buy America provisions would be inconsistent with the public interest, or Steel and iron materials/products are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available quantities which are of a satisfactory quality. Also, FHWA regulations also waive the applicability of Buy America when alternate bidding procedures are used and lowest overall total bid Contact Edwin Okonkwo Office of Program Administration 202-366-1558 E-mail Edwin http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/buyam_ga.cfm 5/15/2013 FHWA's Buy America Q and A for Federal -aid Program - Buy America - Contract Admi... Page 2 of 10 based on using domestic steel is 25% more than the lowest overall total bid based on using foreign steel. Q# 3. Who may request a Buy America waiver? A# 3. The (Local Public Agency (LPA)/State DOT) administering the Federal -aid project may request a project specific waiver. Q# 4. May the FHWA issue a standing national or regional waiver? A# 4. Yes. FHWA may issue a standing national or regional waiver if it is warranted. Q# 5. On what basis may a nationwide waiver be granted? A# 5. A nationwide waiver of a specific iron or steel product may be granted by the Secretary of Transportation if the product is not manufactured in the United States and the public rulemaking process demonstrates that non -domestic availability of the product would adversely impact the Federal - aid program in multiple states, specific region and/or nationwide. Q# 6. Has FHWA granted any nationwide waivers? A# 6. Yes. FHWA has granted two nationwide waivers, 1) on February 9, 1994 for ferryboat equipment and machinery parts, and 2) on March 24, 1995 for pig iron and processed, pelletized, and reduced iron ore. For more details, see http://www.fhwa.dot.qov/programadmin/contracts/020994.cfm and http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/proqramadmin/contracts/032495.cfnn Q# 7. Who may request a nationwide waiver? A# 7. The LPAs/State DOTs may request a nationwide waiver. Q# 8. How often does FHWA approve waivers based on public interest? A# 8. Not very often. An example of when a public interest waiver may be considered could be during an emergency situation. Another example may be where a certain steel or iron product is to be evaluated on an experimental basis. Q# 9. What is the FHWA's minimum threshold for Buy America to apply? A# 9. Per regulation, the FHWA's minimum threshold for Buy America to apply is $2,500 (the total amount of iron and steel products as delivered to the project) or 0.1 % of the total contract amount, whichever is greater. Q# 10. In emergency situations, does FHWA offer any type of relief to Buy America policy? A# 10. The Buy America requirements apply during emergency situations. However, when the responsible agency demonstrates that the application of Buy America requirements would be inconsistent with the public interest, or that the necessary steel or iron is not available domestically, the FHWA may grant a waiver. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/buyam_ga.cfm 5/15/2013 FHWA's Buy America Q and A for Federal -aid Program - Buy America - Contract Admi... Page 3 of 10 Q# 11. Can states have Buy America requirements that are more restrictive than FHWA's Buy America? A# 11. Yes. Under 23 U.S.C. 313(d) and 23 CFR 635.410 (b) (2), State DOTS may establish standard contract provisions requiring the use of domestic materials or products to the same or greater extent than the FHWA Buy America requirements. However, State DOTs cannot establish less restrictive requirements for Federal -aid funded projects. Q# 12. Do Buy America requirements apply to manufactured products? A# 12. No.The FHWA's 1983 final Buy America regulations (see http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/contracts/112583.cfm) waive the application of Buy America to manufactured products that do not include steel and iron components. However, Buy America requirements apply to any steel or iron component of a manufactured product regardless of the overall composition of the manufactured product (e.g. Buy America applies to the steel wire mesh or steel reinforcing components of a precast reinforced concrete pipe). Project Applicability Q# 13. Does Buy America apply to recycled steel? A# 13. No. Although raw materials used in the steel manufacturing process may be imported, all manufacturing processes to produce steel products must occur domestically, including the addition of additives and the application of coatings. However, raw materials such as iron ore, limestone and waste products are not covered. The FHWA's November 25, 2983 final rule defined waste products to include scrap as steel that is no longer useful in its present form (e.g. steel from old automobiles, machinery, pipe, railroad tracks, etc.). Q# 14. Do Buy America requirements apply to coating materials and the process of applying a coating? A# 14. Yes. Section 1041(a) of the 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act expressly provides that the application of a coating for iron or steel is subject to Buy America. In 1993, the FHWA amended its regulations at 23 CFR 635.410(b)(1) to implement ISTEA section 1041(a) to clarify that the manufacturing process for the application of a coating is covered by Buy America requirements; however, the material being applied as a coating is not covered under Buy America. A coating means any process that protects or enhances the value of a material or product to which it is applied, such as epoxy coatings, galvanizing or painting. Q# 15. Does Buy America apply to aluminum products (like aluminum light poles)? A# 15. No. Buy America applies only to iron and steel products. Q# 16. Can a State DOT apply the Buy America requirements on an incremental basis by allowing a very small amount of foreign steel to be used as the work progresses? http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/buyam_ga.cfm 5/15/2013 FHWA's Buy America Q and A for Federal -aid Program - Buy America - Contract Admi... Page 4 of 10 A# 16. No. State DOTs cannot apply Buy America requirements on an incremental basis. A State DOT must track the amount of incorporated foreign steel and iron as the work proceeds to ensure that the minimal use threshold amount is not exceeded at any point in the contract (0.1% of the total contract amount or $2,500 whichever is greater). Q# 17. Does Buy America apply if a State DOT makes the cost of eligible iron and steel products Federal -aid non -participating in construction of a Federal -aid project? A# 17. Yes. Buy America applies to all steel and iron products supplied and permanently incorporated into a Federal -aid project regardless of the funding source actually used to purchase the product. Q# 18. Does Buy America apply if the steel or iron for a Federal -aid funded project is procured by the State through a separate contract? A# 18. Yes. Buy America applies to all iron and steel products permanently incorporated into Federal -aid funded project, regardless of how they were procured. Q# 19. Does Buy America apply to iron and steel (sheet piling, scaffolding, etc) products used on a temporary basis for construction of a Federal -aid project. A# 19. No. Buy America applies only to iron and steel products required to be permanently incorporated into a Federal -aid construction project. Temporary use means that the contract specifications provide that the iron and steel products used on the project either must be removed at the end of the project or may be removed at the contractor's convenience. Also, where a contracting agency is able to document that phased construction is imminent and the steel or iron product will be removed in subsequent near term stages, then the iron or steel product may be considered temporary and not subject to Buy America. However, if the iron or steel product is required to remain in place at the end of the contract (per contract documents) and where phased construction is not imminent, then the product is deemed permanent and Buy America applies. Q# 20. Can a State DOT transfer a Buy America waiver granted for an item from one Federal -aid project to another Federal -aid project (i.e. utilize an approved waiver on multiple projects)?. A# 20. No. Buy America waivers are approved on a project - by -project basis and they are not transferable. Therefore a waiver that is approved for one particular project cannot be used on another project. Only a nationwide waiver can be used for multiple projects. Q# 21. Do Buy America apply to iron and steel products that were competitively procured in one project, for construction of a Federal -aid project? A# 21.. Yes. With accompanying certification showing that the products were manufactured domestically, if they are for permanent installation and a public interest finding as required by 23 CFR 635.407 for the use of state -furnished material. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/buyam_ga.cfm 5/15/2013 FHWA's Buy America Q and A for Federal -aid Program - Buy America - Contract Admi... Page 5 of 10 Waivers Q# 22. What does the FHWA need in order to consider a project waiver request? A# 22. The agency administering Federal -aid project submits the waiver request with supporting information to the FHWA Division Office. The Division Office is responsible for ensuring that the request includes the necessary information before the information is submitted to the Office of Program Administration. Relevant supporting information includes the following information: • the project number, • project description, • project cost, waiver item, • cost of waiver item, • country of origin of the product (if known at the time), • reasons for the waiver request, • a description of the efforts made by the State to locate a domestically manufactured product, and • an analysis of re -design of the project using alternate or approved equal domestic product. Q# 23. Has FHWA denied any waiver request? A# 23. Yes. If FHWA discovers a domestic product during the review of waiver request, the request will be denied. See htto://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/waivers.cfmfor Buy America waiver requests denied. Q# 24. How often does FHWA receive and approve waivers based on non - availability? A# 24. FHWA frequently receives Buy America waiver requests and conducts preliminary reviews on each to ensure that waiver request is warranted before they are formally processed. FHWA actually approves most waiver requests that are formally processed because they are usually thoroughly vetted before being submitted for approval. Q# 25. What is the process for submitting a waiver request? A# 25. The agency (State DOT/LPA) administering the Federal -aid project is responsible for submitting a waiver request to the FHWA Division Office for preliminary reviews and recommendations. The Division Office will then forward the request to the FHWA'sOffice of Program Administrationfor formal in-depth review and for a final decision. Q# 26. Is a waiver necessary for an item that would otherwise be non- participating? A# 26. Yes. A Buy America waiver request is necessary for all foreign iron and steel products permanently incorporated into a Federal -aid project even if there is no Federal funding involved in the purchase of the iron and steel products. Q# 27. What process does the FHWA follow once a waiver request has been submitted to the Office of Program Administration? http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/buyam_qa.cfm 5/ 15/2013 FHWA's Buy America Q and A for Federal -aid Program - Buy America - Contract Admi... Page 6 of 10 A# 27. FHWA's process for reviewing a Buy America waiver request is posted at htto://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/waivers.cfmin compliance with the Public Law 111.117 "Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010" and SAFETEA-LU Technical Corrections Bill (Public Law No. 110-244, Section 117). Counting the Value of Domestic/Foreign Steel Q# 28. What are the costs associated with the value of iron and steel as delivered to the project? A# 28. The total cost of iron and steel includes the cost of the material plus the cost of transportation to the project site, as evidenced by delivery receipt, but does not include labor costs involved in final assembly. Q# 29. If a U.S supplier purchases foreign steel, performs domestic fabrication on the foreign steel and then supplies the fabricated product to a contractor on a Federal -aid construction project, should the cost of domestic fabrication be included as part of cost of foreign steel as delivered to the project? A# 29. No. Since the regulation requires that all manufacturing process on iron and steel products must take place domestically, the cost of domestic manufacturing process(es) performed on the foreign iron or steel products should not be included in the value of materials as delivered to the project. However, the cost of domestic manufacturing process(es) must be clearly documented. Q# 30. When a domestic steel product leaves the country for non -domestic fabrication, how should I calculate the value of non -domestic content? A# 30. Fabrication is a manufacturing process that must take place in the United States. If a domestic steel product leaves the country for non -domestic fabrication, the entire steel product becomes foreign steel. Other Applicabilities Q# 31. What Buy America requirements apply to projects funded with ARRA TIGER I funding? A# 31. For TIGER I grant projects funded solely with TIGER I funds, ARRA Section 1605 applies. Title XII of the Recovery Act specifically provides that ARRA-funded highways are to be administered as if apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code. Accordingly, ARRA-funded highway projects are administered in accordance with the requirements of title 23, United States Code, including the provisions of Buy America at 23 USC 313. The implementing regulations are in 2 CFR Part 176, Subpart B. For FHWA TIGER I grant projects funded with either Title 23 funds or regular apportioned ARRA funding, 23 USC 313 applies. The implementing regulations are in 23 CFR 635D. See P0-10 of the ARRA Q&As (http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/economicrecovery/qandas.htm#a4). Q# 32. What Buy America requirements apply to projects funded with TIGER II funds? http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/buyam_qa.cfm 5/15/2013 FHWA's Buy America Q and A for Federal -aid Program - Buy America - Contract Admi... Page 7 of 10 A# 32. FHWA projects funded solely with TIGER II funds, or a combination of TIGER II and Title 23 funds, shall apply the 23 U.S.C. 313 requirements if the project is to construct or reconstruct a highway. Q# 33. Are there differences between Buy America requirements of 23 U.S.C. 313 and Buy American requirements of 41 U.S.C. 10a - 10d? A# 33. Yes. Buy America requirements apply to Federal -aid projects, while the Buy American requirements apply to direct Federal procurement contracts. Q# 34. Can you apply Buy American provisions to Federal -aid projects? A# 34. No. Buy American provisions do not apply to Federal - aid projects. It applies to direct Federal procurement contracts using Federal Acquisition Regulations. However, if a Federal agency is acting as the direct contracting entity for a project involving Federal -aid funding, such as an arrangement between a State DOT and a FHWA Federal Lands Division Office, the project will be procured pursuant to the FAR and Buy American will apply. Q# 35. Do NAFTA, WTO Agreement on Government Procurement, or other international trade agreements affect the Buy America requirements applicable to the Federal -aid Highway Program? A# 35. No. The NAFTA agreement expressly exempts grants, loans, cooperative agreements, and other forms of Federal financial assistance from its coverage. The WTO Agreement on Government Procurement, and most other free trade agreements, specifically exclude highway and mass transit projects from coverage. For U. S. international obligations see: http://www.ustr.gov/trade-topics/government- procurement/us-obligations-under-international-agreements Q# 36. Do Buy America provisions apply to Federal -aid construction projects that are not considered to be highway construction? A# 36. Yes. All iron or steel products that are permanently incorporated in a Title 23-funded project are covered by Buy America requirements. The coverage for Title 23 eligible projects includes projects that may not have been historically considered to be highway construction (e.g. harbor cranes, bicycle racks, railroad stations, trains, motor vehicles, etc). Q# 37. Does Buy America apply to iron and steel products donated by State DOT, Public Local Agency, or Contractor for construction of Federal -aid projects? A# 37. Yes. Buy America applies to all donated iron and steel products. Q# 38. When a project is jointly funded by FHWA and FTA, which Buy America provisions should be used by the contracting agency? A# 38. When a project combines funding from both the FTA and the FHWA programs, an agency should transfer the project funds to whichever agency is serving as the lead agency. When FHWA funds are transferred to FTA for a transit project, then FTA Buy America requirements apply, and when FTA funds are transferred to the FHWA for a highway project, FHWA Buy America requirements apply. For http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/buyam_ga.cfm 5/15/2013 FHWA's Buy America Q and A for Federal -aid Program - Buy America - Contract Admi... Page 8 of 10 joint funded projects involving other Federal agencies where there is no established lead agency, 23 USC 313 continues to apply to the FHWA funding and other agencies' requirements apply as well. Q# 39. For compliance purposes, when does a contractor need to provide a certification that iron and steel products for a Federal -aid project are of domestic products? A# 39. Certification is required prior to permanent incorporation of iron and steel products into a Federal -aid project. Q# 40. What is step certification? A# 40. A step certification is a process under which each handler (supplier, fabricator, manufacturer, processor, etc) of the iron and steel products certifies that their step in the process was domestically performed. Q# 41. What is "green rod" and is it subject to Buy America coverage? A# 41. Green rod is basically mild steel that is hot drawn and rolled with scale. It is used by welding rod manufacturers to produce welding rod. Since the green rod is typically an iron/steel product, it is covered by Buy America requirements. Q# 42. Is welding process covered by Buy America requirements? A# 42. Yes. All welding process must take place domestically since the welding rod itself is typically an iron/steel product and the welding process substantially alters the rod. Q# 43. Does Buy America apply to work constructed by a railroad under a contract or agreement? A# 43. Yes. MAP-21 Section 1518 requires the application of Buy America to all contracts eligible for assistance under the scope of NEPA project if Federal -aid funds were obligated after October 1, 2012 for any project (by contract or agreement) under the approved NEPA document. In that case, Buy America requirements will apply to railroad agreement/contract regardless of the funding source. The only exception is if the railroad work is ineligible for Federal - aid Highway Program funding. Q# 44. Do Buy America requirements apply to an eligible utility contract/agreement being completed by the utility company under a State/Utility company relocation contract/agreement? A# 44. Yes. MAP-21 Section 1518 requires the application of Buy America to all contracts eligible for assistance under the scope of NEPA project if Federal -aid funds were obligated after October 1, 2012 for any project (by contract or agreement) under the approved NEPA document. In that case, Buy America requirements will apply to utility agreement/contract regardless of the funding source (see Q&A #45 for an exception). Additional Buy America utility guidance is located at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/utilities/buyam.cfm http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/buyam_ga.cfin 5/15/2013 FHWA's Buy America Q and A for Federal -aid Program - Buy America - Contract Admi... Page 9 of 10 Q# 45. Do the Buy America requirements apply to the relocation of utilities necessitated by a highway improvement project where State law, does not allow the State DOT to reimburse the utility for relocation costs? A# 45. No. When State law prohibits State DOTs from reimbursing utilities, 23 USC 133(a) prohibits Federal -aid participation. Such work is then not subject to Buy America requirements. Additional Buy America utility guidance is located at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/utilities/buyam.cfm Q# 46. Does Buy America apply to domestic iron/steel products purchased by contractor and shipped overseas for use in physical assembly (i.e. reinforcement bars for formation of concrete pipes, and shapes)? A# 46. No. Buy America does not apply to iron/steel products shipped overseas strictly for physical assembly. Note that if any of the manufacturing process (bending, extruding, drilling, coating etc.) occurs on the domestic iron/steel product while overseas, the resulting product becomes foreign and does not conform with Buy America requirements. Q# 47. In using the alternate bid procedure mentioned in 23 CFR 635.410 (b)(3), is the comparison for the 25% differential based on the value of the total iron/steel products in each bid? A# 47. No. The comparison must be between the total lowest bid using domestic iron/steel product and the total lowest bid using foreign iron/steel product. Note that if the state elects to use alternate bid provisions, all bidders must be required to submit a bid based on furnishing domestic iron/steel. The contract must be awarded to bidder who submits the lowest total bid based on furnishing domestic steel, unless this bid is more than 25% higher than the total bid based on foreign steel or iron products Q# 48. How does FHWA resolve an after -the -fact discovery of an inadvertent incorporation of foreign iron and steel products into a Federal - aid project? A# 48. For resolving an after -the -fact discovery of incorporated foreign iron and steel products exceeding the minimal use amount (the greater amount of $2,500 or 0.1 % of the contract value), FHWA will review the following information to determine the appropriate resolution: i. The state's material certification procedures for determining Buy America compliance. ii. Degree of diligence by the State DOT and contracting agency in ensuring Buy America compliance. iii. Contract provisions prescribing Buy America requirements. iv. Availability of domestic iron and steel products or its equivalent at the time when excess foreign iron and steel products were incorporated into the project. v. Issues associated with removal and replacement with domestic iron and steel products during construction/completion. With the Headquarters' concurrence, available options based on the conclusion of the reviews include the following: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/buyam_ga.cfm 5/15/2013 FHWA's Buy America Q and A for Federal -aid Program - Buy America - Contract Ad... Page 10 of 10 a. Remove the excess foreign iron and steel products and replace with domestic iron and steel products. b. Make the non -compliant iron and steel products Federal -aid non -participating. c. In instances where there is evidence of carelessness, negligence, incompetence, or understaffing on the part of the contracting agency, the Division Office may determine that all project costs are ineligible. Updated: 02/22/2013 © FHWA FHWA Home I Engineering I Construction United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/contracts/buyam_ga.cfm 5/15/2013 SR-91 CIP: Buy America interpretation forcing potential project delays Problem: The State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (SR-91 CIP), as well as other transportation projects throughout Riverside County and California, face indefinite delays due to refusal by utility companies to sign relocation agreements that contain Buy America mandates required by the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) interpretation of MAP-21. RCTC is eager to comply with FHWA's interpretation of MAP-21 Buy America provisions but faces ongoing refusals by utility companies to execute utility and to certify Buy America compliance. Utilities are "fixed" entities —there is no alternative vendor RCTC can use. Therefore, utility owner refusal to sign relocation agreements with Buy America provisions results in job -creation delays, project delivery delays and delay claims, cost increases, and design complications if not resolved in the very near term. SR-91 CIP Quick Facts • Total Project Cost: $1.3 billion • Federal Investment: $445 million TIFIA loan • Est. Job Creation: 16,000 construction -related jobs; 2% permanent sales tax revenue boost • Project Description: Extension of 91 Express Lanes and regular lanes, numerous interchange reconstructions Critical Dates: Utility Company Est. Date When Delays Begin Accumulating w/o Utility Agreements Utilities Needing Relocation for SR-91 CIP AT&T June 2013 (Less than one month away) Fiber-optic trunk line under East Grand Ave. Southern California Edison Late July 2013 Engineered Steel Poles Note: These are only the first of a multitude of relocations that could bring the SR-91 CIP to a standstill. Cost of Delay: S95.000 per day Each day that the project's opening is delayed costs RCTC an additional $95,000 and adds to the frustration experienced by motorists on SR-91. Although project completion is scheduled for 2017, frontend utility relocation delays will jeopardize that timeline. The project delay calculation is based on factors such as loss of toll revenue, monetary value of traffic delays incurred by the public, and project staffing overhead expenses. The $95,000/day figure represents RCTC's contractual obligation to its design -builder for late project opening. Additional delay claims and costs by the design -builder against RCTC could also occur. Potential Delay length: Unknown SR-91 CIP: Buy America interpretation forcing potential project delays What MAP-21 Says about Buy America: MAP-21 amended Buy America statutes (23 USC §313) to require that Buy America requirements extend to "all contracts" that are related to a NEPA-approved project. The U.S. DOT has interpreted this to apply to utility relocation agreements between projects sponsors and utility companies. What Utility companies Say: Responses have varied among utility companies, however very little is still known as to why most utility companies will not or cannot certify Buy America compliance for relocations. What RCTC has done: • Proactively communicate with Federal Highway Administration headquarters about Buy America impasse with utility companies • Proactively communicate with utilities, especially Southern California Edison and AT&T, urging them to work with RCTC on a solution that will allow SR-91 CIP to move forward Project sponsors across the country, including RCTC for SR-91 CIP, need one of the three to occur as soon as possible to avoid delays to projects and the jobs they will create (in no particular order): 1. Legislation to amend 23 USC §313 relative to utility relocations 2. New interpretation of MAP-21 by US DOT to delineate these are utility agreements (not contracts) 3. Utility companies sign relocation agreements with Buy America provisions VIA CERTIFIED US MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED April 16, 2013 Mr. Malcolm Dougherty Director California Department of Transportation 100 S. Main Street Los Angeles, California 90112 Re: Caltrans Utility Form Relocation Agreement/Application of "Buy America" Provisions (23 U.S.C. 313, et seq.) Dear Mr. Dougherty: This letter is in response to the March 18, 2013 email request from Brent Green to Reed Reisner of Southern California Edison ("SCE"). The email requested executive contacts from SCE for the purpose of establishing a conference call to discuss the applicability of new Buy America requirements (Map-21, Section 1518 and 23 U.S.C. 313) applicable to Caltrans direct and sponsored/oversight projects. I will be your initial contact, but I will no doubt include some of my staff and others in our organization into this issue. As you may know, SCE has fielded numerous requests for utility relocations from various governmental agencies that rely on Caltrans funding and oversight. Given the short timeframes for these projects, we thought it best to provide you and the requesting agencies with guidance as to our position on the application of Buy America and whether SCE will be able to comply. SCE has begun evaluating whether and how it (along with its vendors) can comply with the new Buy America requirements. As explained below, SCE has concluded that its current procurement processes, inventory systems, and vendor controls cannot be verified as compliant with the new Buy America requirements. Moreover, given that the requirements were only recently adopted, there is a relative lack of guidance from federal agencies such as the Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA") and Caltrans as to how SCE can recalibrate its systems to ensure compliance. Therefore, at present, SCE cannot sign Caltrans utility relocation agreements containing a warranty and/or representation of Buy America compliance. SCE understands that Map-21 expanded the application of Buy America beyond contracts that directly receive Federal Aid Highway Program ("FAHP") funds. Under the new statute, effective October 1, 2012, if one contract within the scope of a NEPA document is receiving FAHP funds, then the Buy America provision statute at 23 U.S.C. 313 applies to all contracts that were within the scope of the NEPA document and that were eligible for FAHP funding, regardless of the actual source of funding used for those contracts. This expanded scope significantly broadens the reach of Buy America. Although our costs may be significant, 566786.2 scope significantly broadens the reach of Buy America. Although our costs may be significant, utility relocations are typically a discreet portion of the overall project budget. Caltrans and its partner agencies have historically paid for utility relocations out of segregated (non-federal) funds and accordingly, Buy America did not apply to utility relocations that were necessary to accommodate federal highway projects. As discussed further below, the addition of Buy America requirements onto the utility relocation work dramatically changes the nature of and the burden on utility resources necessary to complete this work. As you know, the impact on in-flight projects cannot be overstated. To accommodate Caltrans and its partner agencies, SCE has begun the process of evaluating its procurement processes, inventory systems, and vendor controls and the ability of these systems to comply with Buy America. To put our review in perspective, SCE maintains an ever increasing list of items it routinely orders as part of utility relocation projects. These items range in complexity from nuts and bolts to electrical transformers and other related machinery that are critical to ensuring the safe and reliable transmission and distribution of electricity. Each item in our inventory system has a unique stock keeping number ("SKU"). SCE currently has approximately 22,000 SKUs in its system. An average relocation involving the relocation of SCE distribution facilities can involve upwards of 500 different SKUs. However each project is unique and may require a customized collection of supplies and equipment. The nature of the project and configuration of our facilities drives which of the 22,000 SKUs will ultimately be needed. At present, we have completed a precursory evaluation of over 400 SKUs. While we were able to confirm through this evaluation that SCE acquires a significant number of items from domestic suppliers, this review revealed that information necessary to verify Buy American compliance is not readily available. Generally, our vendors acquire the items we need from a variety of sources. Put simply, our vendor may be the third or fourth step in the supply chain. Therefore, although our vendor may be situated in the United States and the supplier the vendor receives the item from may be in the United States, in many instances, neither our vendor nor the supplier can provide the requisite certification that the item or each part of an item (which may in the instance of complicated machinery or equipment consist of multiple items, parts, or components) originated in the US. On this point, we note that the level of exactitude required for compliance certification remains unclear given that FHWA has not yet begun the rulemaking process it has stated it intends to pursue in 2013 to address implementation of the Map-21 Buy America provision. Assuming SCE were able to confirm Buy America -compliant sourcing of equipment and supplies necessary for discreet projects, SCE will need to assess the continuing availability of such items. To the extent SCE is required to make "special orders" from new or unknown vendors and suppliers, SCE engineers may need to analyze and compare the items to ensure the same relative level of quality and durability associated with our known vendors and suppliers. 566786.2 The results of our review may have implications for reliability and project safety which are as of yet unknown. In addition, SCE would need to adopt dramatic changes to its inventory management and storage processes in order to manage project -specific sourcing. To illustrate: SCE has a service territory covering approximately 50,000 square miles. Within our service territory, SCE owns and maintains over 12,000 miles of transmission lines and nearly 90,000 miles of distribution lines. SCE maintains a number of storage and laydown yards containing various materials needed for our own projects such as deteriorated pole replacements and facilities upgrades to accommodate new load growth. The application of the Buy America requirements to Caltrans sponsored projects would effectively force SCE to segregate our own materials from those sourced for Caltrans or Cal mns sponsored projects utilizing federal funds. Thus, SCE may be required to either develop processes and protocols for the handling of such materials and/or SCE may be required to acquire specialized storage yards for such materials. We note that such segregation of our inventory would be in conflict with both the spirit and the letter of 23 CFR § 645.117(e)(1), which requires SCE "to furnish [materials and supplies for utility relocations] from company stock except that they may be obtained from other sources near the project site when available at a lower cost." It also is in conflict with the provision stating that "The utility shall not be required to change its existing standards for materials used in permanent changes to its facilities." 23 CFR § 645.117(e)(1). The foregoing summary is by no means exhaustive and we will attempt to report on new or emerging issues to Caltrans and other impacted governmental agencies as we move through our initial review. However, SCE is not prepared to comply with the new Buy America requirements at this time. SCE is fully prepared to assist Caltrans in briefing FHWA and other regulators as to the challenges we face in attempting to implement these requirements. We are hopeful that appropriate legislative and administrative changes can be made so as to provide appropriate exemptions/waivers for utilities and, to the extent Buy America remains applicable, how the utilities may develop mutually acceptable and workable Buy America compliance and certification programs. We look forward to discussing these issues with you further at our briefing. In the interim, please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or concerns. Since alt des Southern California Edison, Vice President, Supply Management 566786.2 AGENDA ITEM 8 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 8. AGENDA ITEM 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: May 20, 2013 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Shirley Medina, Programming and Planning Manager SUBJECT: Development of 2013 Multi -Funding Call for Projects STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the TAC to receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the April TAC meeting, staff reported that a subcommittee of the TAC would be convened to review the structure and format of Call for Projects. The TAC Subcommittee met on April 30, 2013 and a summary of the discussion is attached. TECHNICAL ADVISORY SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING SUMMARY The Technical Advisory Subcommittee met on April 30, 2013 to provide input on the 2013 Multi -funding Call for Projects. Several topics were discussed as follows: Project Schedules: o All projects must prepare realistic schedules to include the federal process (such as NEPA/CEQA, Buy America, DBE goals, etc.). o If a project qualifies for Measure A Regional Arterial (MARA) funds (Western Riverside County arterials), two projects schedules should be prepared to include federal process and non-federal process. o If an agency already has completed CEQA, is eligible for MARA funds, and the project is ready for construction, local agencies will need to indicate this in its application. Minimum/Maximum Amount for Funding Request: o The fund request should be a minimum of $350,000 with total project cost exceeding this amount. However, smaller projects such as bike lanes, signal synchronization projects, etc., can be lower than $350,000 but it is encouraged that the requested funding is at least $150,000 for these smaller type projects. o There will not be a maximum or limit on how much a project can request. PA&ED Funding: o Up to 5% of the CMAQ and STP funds (up to $5.7M) will be set aside to fund PE only. Funding of PA&ED only will consider the constructability and deliverability of the proposed project. - Application Submittal Timeline: o 12 weeks will be allowed for the preparation of applications. Project Categories Will Generally Include the Following: o For STP - eligible projects will include improvements on highways and local arterials including capacity enhancements, interchange improvements, bridge and arterial widening. o For CMAQ— non -capacity enhancing projects that improve air quality and reduce congestion such as : ■ Traffic Flow Improvements - Traffic Signal Control Systems, Incident Management programs, High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes, and Truck Climbing Lanes that are not capacity increasing ■ Transit Projects (including Bus expansion purchases, new transit centers) ■ Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Programs ■ Travel Demand Management (toll facilities) ■ Outreach and Rideshare Activities ■ Telecommuting ■ Alternative Fuel Programs ■ Transportation Activities in an Approved State Implementation Plan (SIP) or Maintenance Plan o Grade Separations: ■ The Commission has a policy in place that sets aside 25% of CMAQ and STP funding specifically for Grade Separations. Therefore, this call for projects will not include Grade Separation projects. o Coachella Valley CMAQ: ■ Coachella Valley Association of Governments will hold a separate Call for Projects for Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB) CMAQ apportionment funds Criteria: o Points will be assigned for each criterion and will range from 1 to 10 depending on the criterion. The total maximum points a project could receive is 55. 1. Regional Significance - Up to 5 points for ADT, Up to 5 points for regional system Local agencies will provide Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts and discuss the regional significance of the project. Projects on the Congestion Management Program (CMP) system, Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) network, and National Highway System (NHS), Master Bike Plan, and that are multi -jurisdictional will qualify for more points. One point will be given for each system or network and an additional two points will be given for multi -jurisdictional projects. For example, if a project is on a TUMF network and NHS network, it will receive 2 points. Scoring for ADT is as follows: ADT above 20,000 =1 ADT above 30,000 = 2 ADT above 40,000 = 3 ADT above 50,000 = 4 ADT above 60,000 = 5 2. Project Readiness — Up to 10 points This criterion will be double weighted (x 2). Projects will receive points based on how much work has been done. 10 points = Ready for construction (PA&ED, PS&E, R/W Certified) 8 points = PA&ED Complete, project within 6 months of construction (e.g. 95% PS&E, R/W cert within 6 months of construction) 6 points = PA&ED Complete, project within 12 months of construction (e.g. 60% PS&E, R/W cert within 12 mos) 4 points = PA&ED Complete, at 35% PS&E and R/W initiated 2 points = PA&ED complete 3. Local Match — (1 to 10 points) Extra points will be given to projects that provide local match above and beyond the minimum required, which is 11.47 percent for CMAQ and STP funds. Local agencies will be required to provide a resolution or council action on the commitment of local match. 10 points = 55% or more 8 points = 45-54% 6 points = 35-44% 4 points = 25-34% 2 point = 15-24% 4. Safety —1 to 5 points Local agencies will provide accident information and other documentation that justifies project safety benefits. A qualitative discussion will also be required to explain the proposed project's safety benefits. Collision rate calculations from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) website will be provided for projects that can apply this data. 5. Air Quality —Ito 5 points (Consultant, Mr. Ray Gorski to conduct analyses) Local agencies will provide input data for the Commission's air quality consultant to perform an air quality assessment for each project. Results of the assessment will be provided at the Project Evaluations. 6. Cost Benefit -1 to 5 points (Consultant, Mr. Ray Gorski to conduct analyses) The Commission's air quality consultant will perform a cost benefit analysis for each project. Results of the analysis will be provided at the Project Evaluations and points will be assigned relative to the results of the analysis. The Call for Projects will include a template for agencies to complete with the required input needed to perform the analysis for various project categories. 7. Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainability Communities Strategy (SCS) —Ito 10 points Local agencies will discuss how the project is identified or consistent with the 2012 SCAG RTP and/or 5C5. Points will be assigned based on the project's relationship to the RTP and SCS. For example, if a widening project also includes pedestrian and bicycle paths, it would receive higher points than a widening project without pedestrian and bicycle paths. Given that this is the first time that RTP/SCS is being used for ranking projects, there will be discussion at the Project Evaluations on how to apply points to this criterion. AGENDA ITEM ZO RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: May 20, 2013 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Grace Alvarez, Senior Staff Analyst Eric DeHate, Staff Analyst SUBJECT: 2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 2013 FTIP On April 15, 2013 RCTC staff presented updates to the 2013 FTIP and reported the approval of the 2013 FTIP federal conformity, as well as approvals for Formal Amendment No's. 1 and 3 and Administrative Modification No's. 2 and 5. Since the approval of the 2013 FTIP, SCAG has processed five Formal Amendments, three Administrative Modifications and one RTP Consistency Amendment. Currently, RCTC has participated in eight out of the nine amendments encompassing changes to 144 projects including Formal Amendment No. 9, submitted to SCAG on May 7, 2013. As noted on the 2013 FTIP Amendment Log Approval (attached), Formal Amendment No's 1, 3 and 6 and Administrative Modification No's 2, 5 and 8 have been approved. Also approved is Formal Amendment No. 7, which is SCAG's lump sum listing for Job Access Reverse Commute (JARC) and New Freedom (NF) transit grant projects for Riverside County non- profit transit providers. Pending approval is 2012 RTP Consistency Amendment No. 4 and most recently submitted Formal Amendment 9. Anticipation of approval of Consistency Amendment No. 4 is end of June 2013 as well as Formal Amendment No. 9. Attachment: 2013 FTIP Amendment Log 2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program - Amendment Submittals and Approval Dates 2013 FTIP Purpose No. of Projects Due to RCTC Due to SCAG Anticipated Approval Final Approval Final 12/13/2012 Amendment 1 Formal Amendment 53 10/8/2012 10/22/2012 1/31/2013 1/24/2013 Amendment 2 Administrative Modification 23 11/19/2012 11/27/2012 12/15/2013 12/19/2012 Amendment 3 Formal Amendment 14 12/17/2012 1/8/2013 3/15/2013 3/13/2013 RTP Consistency Amendment/Amendment 4 Formal Amendment 1 1/9/2013 1/14/2013 6/30/2013 Amendment 5 Administrative Modification 15 1/24/2013 2/5/2013 2/28/2013 2/21/2013 Amendment 6 Formal Amendment 8 2/25/2013 3/5/2013 4/30/2013 4/18/2013 Amendment 7' Formal Amendment 2/27/2013 4/30/2013 3/22/2013 Amendment 8 Administrative Modification 15 4/1/2013 4/9/2013 4/30/2013 4/25/2013 Amendment 9 Formal Amendment 15 4/29/2013 5/7/2013 6/21/2013 Total Number of Projects 144 'RCTC did not participate in this Amendment 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx As of May 13, 2013 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 1 of 20 2013 FTIP -Formal Amendment No. 1 October 2012 RCTC !! ;:, uMilwCover/ rca.wwor FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason CALTRANS RIVLS01 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP COLLISION REDUCTION PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 - W RR/HY CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMNT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS Cost Increase (EA: 0M420 added to FY 2012/2013, OP280 added to FY 2013/2014, OR740 added to FY 2014/2015). CALTRANS RIVLS09 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP MANDATES PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 - RR/HWY CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMNT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS New Project - EA: 0M310 City of Riverside RIV120801 IN RIVERSIDE FOR RIVERSIDE SPECIAL SERVICES - CAPITALIZED PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE (FY 12 - 5307) (UZA: RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for the City of Riverside City of Riverside RIV120802 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RIVERSIDE SPECIAL SERVICES - LEASE OF XEROX MACHINE TO SUPPORT TRANSIT DIVISION NEEDS, PER APPROVED 2012/2013 SRTP - TABLE 4, PROJECT NO. FY 13-4 (FY 13 - 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for the City of Riverside COACHELLA RIV061159 AT SR86/Avenue 50: Widen and construct new 6 through lane IC from E/O Coachella Stormwater Channel Bridge to E/O Tyler St. Improvements include: extended ramp acceleration/deceleration lanes, relocate/realign Ave 50 and Tyler St, bike lanes, sidewalks, and reconstruct traffic signals (SAFETEA-LU 1702, CA 583, #2543) (EA: 0C970). Cost decrease based on revised engineer's estimate and schedule delay, per current PA&ED start phase. COACHELLA RIV071246 In the City of Coachella - Construct new (Non -capacity) Ave 52 Grade Separation overhead structure spanning over UPRR mainline tracks and Grapefruit Blvd/Hwy 111, from Shady Ln to approx 600' E/O Industrial Way/Tyler St. Improvements incl: Reconfig connection from Ave 52 to Grapefruit Blvd/Hwy 111, bike Ins, sidewalks, retaining walls, reconst traffic sigs/driveways, remove existing at -grade crossing. Reprogramming of funding mainly needed to utilize CITY funding for R/W and increase CMAQ in construction. Minor project description made to correct the problem in the database with ft (" instead of') - abbreviation to the crossing at the end of the project description was needed to stay within the character limitation. Additionally, Sec 125 Surface Transportation Priorities funding was deleted and FFY 2009 Appropriation Earmark added to clarify the earmark appropriation in 2009 (Public Law 111-8). Corona RIV010209 In the City of Corona - Construct Foothill Parkway Westerly Extension 4 lane road from Lincoln Ave to Paseo Grande (Approx 2.5 miles) Cost decrease based on current engineer's estimate and minor schedule delay that does not impact the model (2014). 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 2 of 20 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1 October 2012 ti� RCTC i uk..,1ee FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Corona RIV011240 In Corona on existing McKinley St - Construct grade separation at BNSF Railroad crossing (project study report & preliminary environmental analysis report activities). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years CVAG RIV090102 In the Coachella Valley PM-10 Progra - Clean Vehicle Acquisition Program: Fleet acquisition of alternative fuel sweepers for regional street sweeping program of major arterials, for the reduction of PM10 fugitive dust throughout the Coachella Valley ($229 toll credits used to match CMAQ in const). Reprogram funding from FY 2013/2014 to FY 2014/2015 Desert Hot Springs RIV061161 Essential road improvements - Phase III: City Section 31 including pavement rehab, sidewalks, curb/gutters, cross gutters, ADA ramps & drainage improvements on Ramona Dr., Cactus Dr., El Cajon Dr., La Mesa Dr., Caliente Dr. (Bunch Palms Tr to Hacienda Ave); and Hacienda Ave & Ironwood Dr (Palm Dr to Ramona Dr). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years Indio RIV121102 In Eastern Riverside County in the City of Indio - Monroe Street Widening: Widening of Monroe St between Ave. 49 and Ave. 52 (Approx. 7,800 L.F.), from 2 through lanes to 4 through lanes (2 lanes in ea dir), including bike lane, sidewalk, traffic signal install at Ave. 49 and relocation of signal poles and appurtenances at Ave. 50. NEW SLPP Formula Funds project Indio RIV110831 In the City of Indio - Widen Jefferson St. from Varner Rd to Sun City Blvd from 4 to 6 lanes and widen Varner Rd from 2 to 4 lanes from Jefferson St to approx. 500' East of Jefferson St and then tapering back to 2 lanes. Inc! medians, traffic signals, channelization, left -turn pockets, ded rt turn lanes on SB Jefferson and EB Varner, drainage improvemetns, sidewalks, and bike lanes. Cost Change &Schedule Delay SLPP formula funds project La Quinta RIV121101 In Eastern Riverside County in the City. of La Quinta - Intersection Improvements: Modify the intersection at Hwy 111 and Washington St by adding left turn lanes, right turn lanes, median modifications, res-striping, reconstruction of curb and gutter, signal and signal pole modifications, and replacement of bus turnout.. NEW SLPP Formula Funds project MURRIETA RIV100106 In SW Riverside County - I-15/Los Alamos Rd. Bridge Replacement & Widening: Replacement of existing two lane overcrossing at Los Alamos Rd. and Interstate 15 with a four lane overcrossing (gap closure), bringing the bridge vertical clearance to Caltrans Standards. Cost Change and Schedule Delay SLPP formula funded project Palm Desert RIV071243 In the City of Palm Desert - Free right turn lane-WB Fred Waring Dr to NB Hwy 111: Reconfiguration of a free right turn lane at the intersection from West Bound Fred Waring Dr to north bound Hwy 111 ($61 toll credits used to match CMAQ in construction). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years Palm Desert RIV071255 In the City of Palm Desert - Mid Valley Bike Path: Construct a 6.5 mile class 1 Bike Path along the northern city limits between S/O Washington St. and N/O Monterey Ave. Schedule Delay Palm Desert RIV031208 At I-10/Monterey Ave IC - Reconfigure IC: Construct new WB entry ramp and realign/relocate WB exit ramp (EA: OF050), New project in the 2013 FTIP quadrennial years & Reprogramming of funds Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency RIV120803 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR PALO VERDE TRANSIT AGENCY - OPERATING ASSISTANCE: FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A -RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (UZA: PALO VERDE). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Palo Verde Valley Transit Agency RCTC • RIV120201 On SR-60 near Beaumont: Construct new eastbound and westbound truck lanes from Gilman Springs Rd to 1.6 miles west of Jack Rabbit Trail (EA: ON690) ($746 toll credits used to match CMAQ in PA&ED). Description change to combine RCTC's truck climbing lane with Caltrans SHOPP Safety Improvements per agreement between RCTC and Caltrans 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 3 of 20 2013 FTIP -Formal Amendment No. 1 October 2012 FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013 RCTC AAwske(vxl,TrppppbMpi Wmlekr Agency Project ID Title Update Reason RCTC RIV520109 Reconstruct & Upgrade San Jacinto Branch Line for rail passenger service (Riverside to Perris) (Perris Valley Line) (FY 07 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN). Cost increase and adjustment to toll credit utilization in project description. PTA -RIP funding replaced with Surface Transportation Program - RIP (federal), per CTC. Riverside RIV110116 In Riverside - Quiet Zone X-ing Improvements: Upgrade of 14 at -grade Hwy rail X-ing & one pedestrian only at -grade X-ing along the BNSF San Bernardino Subd. & one at -grade Hwy -rail X-ing along the UPRR Los Angeles Subd w/in the city of Riverside. The improvements are needed to optimize safety at the X-ings and allow for quiet zone to mitigate existing and projected train horn noise impacts. Description change -grade crossings reduced from 14 to 11 based on current conditions Riverside County RIV060123 In Northwest Riverside County on Clay St from approx. 100' SW of General Dr. to approx. 500' N/O Linares Ave: Replace existing 4-lane (2 Ins in each direction) at grade R/R X-ing with a 4-Ln (2 Lns in each direction -non-capacity) undercrossing (UPRR). Cost decrease based on current engineer's estimate and minor schedule delay. CMAQ funds will be obligated in FY 2012/2013, utililzing the EPSP. Riverside County RIV031202 1-10 Bypass South: Construct two lanes of roadway to provide a by-pass/network facility for the I-10, approx. 1/2 mile S/O I-10 between the eastern end of the City of Banning and Apache Trail in Cabazon. Other improvements include the construction of several low-water crossings at Smith Creek and San Gorgonio River (PA&ED). Cost Increase based on the latest engineer's estimate & Schedule Advance Riverside County RIV060124 In Banning on Sunset Ave at 1-10 from s/o Ramsey St to s/o Lincoln St: Lower Sunset Ave to construct new 4-lane UC at UPRR crossing (non -capacity) and reconstruct the 1-10 IC ramps to meet the new street grade (SAFETEA CA438, #1261+ HR4818+HR3058) (EA:33471) Cost Increase per latest TCIF baseline agreement &minor schedule advance. Riverside County RIV011233 At I-15/Limonite Ave IC - Widen IC 4 to 6 Lns, widen NB and SB exit ramps 1 to 2 Ins, add 2 lane loop ramps in the NB and SB directions & widen Limonite Ave from Hamner to Wineville 4 to 6 Lns (approx 1 mi) (EA: 0E1050K). New project in the 2013 FTIP quadrennial years &Reprogramming of funds Riverside Transit Agency RIV091211 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - VEHICLE REPLACEMENT: PURCHASE FIFTY (50) REPLACEMENT HEAVY DUTY CNG REVENUE VEHICLE ROLLING STOCK (FEDERAL APPROPRIATION THROUGH HR 3288, FFY 2009/2010 - FTA 5309). Description Change -FTIP project converted to Lump Sum Listing per 2011 FTIP Guidelines, Grouped Project Listing Category 58 Riverside Transit Agency RIV120819 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - REVENUE VEHICLES FOR CONTRACTED OPERATIONS: PURCHASE OF SEVEN (7) MID -SIZE VEHICLES, REPLACING TYPE II VEHICLES THAT HAVE REACHED THEIR SERVICE LIFE PER FTA GUIDELINES. REPLACEMENT VEHICLES WILL BE USED FOR CONTRACT OPERATED FIXED ROUTE SERVICE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV- SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency -Project No. FY13-2 Riverside Transit Agency RIV120822 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED COST OF TIRE LEASE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA:RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency - Project No. FY13-5 Riverside Transit Agency RIV120825 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - INFORMATION SYSTEMS: PURCHASE OF COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE SYSTEM FOR FIXED ROUTE VEHICLES, HEMET TRAINING ROOM EQUIPMENT, AND RIVERSIDE CONFERENCE ROOM MONITORS - NON ITS COMPONENTS (FTA 5307 - FY13) (UZA: RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency - Project No. FY13-8 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 4 of 20 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1! October 2012 RCTC umids Owhinsionorlon c FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Riverside Transit Agency RIV120826 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - OPERATING ASSISTANCE: FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A- RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: HEMET). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency -Project No. FY13-8. Project funding includes prior years carry overs. Riverside Transit Agency RIV120827 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - CAPITALIZED PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE FOR FY 12-13 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB, TEM/MURR/MEN). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency Riverside Transit Agency RIV120828 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - CAPITAL COST OF CONTRACTING FOR FY 12-13 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency Riverside Transit Agency RIV120820 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA- SUPPORT VEHICLE: PURCHASE OF ONE (1) VEHICLE TO REPLACE A VEHICLE THAT HAS MET ITS USEFUL LIFE REQUIREMENT (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency - Project No. FY13-3 Riverside Transit Agency RIV120821 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - CAPITAL MAINTENANCE SPARES: PURCHASE OF SPARE PARTS FOR ROLLING STOCK UNDER THE BUS MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency - Project No. FY13-4 Riverside Transit Agency RIV120823 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA - TRANSIT ENHANCEMENTS: PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF TRANSIT ENHANCEMENTS FOR BUS STOP SYSTEM SUCH AS INSTALLATION OF BUS SHELTERS AND BENCHES, KIOSKS, SIGNAGE, AND LIGHTING TO ENHANCE SECURITY AND SAFETY OF THE RIDING PUBLIC (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency - Project No. FY13-6 Riverside Transit Agency RIV120824 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE FOR RTA- SUPPORT EQUIPMENT: PURCHASE OF MISCELLANEOUS MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE (E.G., VEHICLE JACKS, WHEELCHAIRS FOR OPERATOR TRAINING, POINJAR, AIR COMPRESSORS/GENERATORS, AND FLOOR SCRUBBERS) (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: RIV-SB). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for Riverside Transit Agency - Project No. FY13-7 SAN JACINTO RIV111129 In San Jacinto — Ramona Exp Widening PH 1: Ramona Exp. Widening of 2 and 4 lanes to 6 lanes regional arterial (3 in each direction) between Sanderson & Eagle Rd., including left -turn or landscape median, drainage improvement, relocation of traffic signal poles and installation of curb and gutter. Exist configuration varies from 2 and 4 lanes - widening will be from 2 to 6 and 4 to 6 Lanes. Cost Increase based on the latest engineer's estimate &minor schedule advance SunLine Transit Agency RIV110407 In the Coachella Valley for SunLine Transit Agency - Job Access & Reverse Commute and New Freedom Project: Express Service to the Pass area with service to Banning and Beaumont, connecting Coachella Valley commuters to Western Riverside County (FTA 5316 and FTA 5317, FYs 09 and 10). project description change to include additional stops in Cabazon, Moreno Valley, and Riverside; Conformity Category changed from Exempt-93.126 to . SunLine Transit Agency RIV120804 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A -RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency SunLine Transit Agency RIV120805 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - CAPITALIZED PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 5 of 20 e 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1 �'I ' RCTC bird* (alery Irprtop4Aen (arrclor October 2012 FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason SunLine Transit Agency RIV120806 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY: REHABILITATION OF SUNLINE'S FLEET OF OLDER BUSES, INCLUDING RESTORATION OF COLORS ON BOTH THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR, AND PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT NEEDED TO REPAIR/REHAB BUSES (FY 13 - 5307) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency - Project No. SL 13-01. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120807 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE TWO REPLACEMENT SERVICE TRUCKS AND FOUR REPLACEMENT CNG RELIEF CARS (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency project No. SL 13-02. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120808 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS: REPAVE THE EXISTING BUS YARD AND STAFF PARKING AREA AT THE THOUSAND PALMS OPERATING FACILITY (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency project No. SL 13-03. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120809 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE TRANSIT STOP ENHANCEMENTS FOR CONTINUED IMPROVEMENTS TO BUS STOPS FOR THE SAFETY AND COMFORT OF PASSENGERS, PER COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATION (CA PROP 1B SECURITY FUNDED PROJECT). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency - Project No. SL 13-04. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120810 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS: IMPROVE THE THOUSAND PALMS AND INDIO FACILITIES, INCLUDING ROOF REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT, NEW CARPETING AND BLINDS, AND REPAIR OF PARKING FACILITIES FOR STAFF USE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency - Project No. SL 13-05. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120811 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - FURNITURE REPLACEMENT: PURCHASE OF OFFICE FURNITURE TO REPLACE AND ADD FURNITURE REACHES THE END OF ITS CYCLE LIFE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency _project No. SL 13-06. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120812 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE OF VARIOUS IT EQUIPMENT, SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR EXISTING AGENCY SYSTEM NEEDS AND TO STREAMLINE OPERATIONS AND PRODUCE REPORTS FOR SUNLINE SERVICES (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency - Project No. SL 13-07. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120813 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY -PURCHASE NEW MODERN, STATE OF THE ART TELEPHONE SYSTEM, IMPROVING THE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency project No. SL 13-08. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120814 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE FIVE (5) NEW SPARE FAREBOXES TO ALLOW EXISTING UNITS TO BE REPAIRED WITHOUT BUS SERVICE INTERRUPTION (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency _project No. SL 13-09. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120815 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - CONDUCT A SAMPLE SURVEY OF SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIDERS, PROVIDING USEFUL INFORMATION TO SUPPORT SUNLINE PLANNING AND MARKETING EFFORTS. SURVEY WILL ALSO INCLUDE NTD SECTION 15 RIDECHECKS (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency - Project No. SL 13-10. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120816 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - PURCHASE MAJOR REPLACEMENT MAINTENANCE TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT FOR ROUTINE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency _project No. SL 13-11. SunLine Transit Agency RIV120817 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY -SPECIAL FUEL PROVISION ALLOWING A PORTION OF AGENCY FUEL COSTS TO BE TREATED AS A CAPITAL MAINTENANCE (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency _project No. SL 13-12. 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 6 of 20 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1 October 2012 FHWA approval: Jan. 24, 2013 RCTC Agency Project ID Title Update Reason SunLine Transit Agency RIV120829 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - SOLAR PANEL REPLACEMENT: REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING SOLAR PANELS, PROVING 33 PERCENT OF SUNLINE ENERGY NEEDS FOR OPERATING OFFICES AND FACILITIES (PROJECT FUNDED BY FY 12 STATE OF GOOD REPAIR, BUS LIVABILITY AND TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT). New project from the 2012/2013 SRTP for SunLine Transit Agency. Number of Projects 53 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx As of May 13, 2013 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 7 of 20 2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 2 November 2012 RCTC Contor SCAG approval: Dec. 19, 2012 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Beaumont RIV100102 In Western Riverside Co in Beaumont: SR79 Bypass Ext No. Ph II - Instal of a 3-Ln pre-fab bridges on the eastside of the Ph I Potrero Bridge SR79 Bypass Ext. No., extending the Potrero Blvd 0.675 mi. No. from the future SR60/Potrero Fwy IC (RIV050535), to connect to the Oak Valley Pkwy in Beaumont, including the instal of a Class I multi -purpose trail, flared intersection and turning pockets. Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP Cathedral City RIV070302 In Eastern Riverside County in the Coachella Valley - Date Palm Dr Bridge Replacement/Widening: Replacement of a two lane (1 In in ea dir) low water crossing bridge over Long Canyon Creek (Bridge No. 00L0043) with a six lane (3 Ins in ea dir), for approximately 350 ft. (from Varner Rd. to 350' S/O Varner Rd). Reprogramming of funding years per HBP update of 10/29/2012. Cathedral City RIV091011 In Eastern Riverside County in the Coachella Valley - Date Palm Dr over the Whitewater River: Widening of Date Palm Dr from 4 to 6 Ins (3 Ins in ea dir), from approx. 350 Ft S/O the bridge to 250 Ft N/O the bridge (Via Estrada to the north and Perez Rd. to the south), including the construction of a raised median and sidewalk along the east side of the project (Bridge No. 56C0189). Cost increase per HBP funding update of 10/29/2012. Indio RIV111202 In the City of Indio - Ave 44 Bridge Replacement: Replace existing Avenue 44 two lane low water crossing over the Coachella Valley Stormwater Channel with a four lane bridge (Bridge No. 00L0056), including 6 ft sidewalk on each side of the bridge. Reprogramming of Engineering funding years per HBP funding update of 10/29/2012. Lake Elsinore RIV111203 In Lake Elsinore - Temescal Canyon Rd. Bridge Replacement/Widening: Replace Temescal Canyon Rd. 2 lane bridge with a 4-lane bridge over Temescal Wash, 0.22 mi. W/O Lake Street (Bridge No. 56C0050). Reprogramming of HBP per 10/29/2012 update. Lake Elsinore RIV091007 In mid -Western Riverside County in the City of Lake Elsinore: Widening of SR-74 from 2 to 4 through lanes (2 lanes in each direction), west of I-15 to the Ortega Mountains. Other improvements include turn pockets and one traffic signal. Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP Moreno Valley RIV091003 In Western Riverside County in the City of Moreno Valley - Eucalyptus Ave. Widening/Extension: Construction of a 4th through lane in the eastern direction from Redlands Blvd. to Theodore St & Extension of Eucalyptus Ave. to Redlands Blvd., with a signalized intersection. Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP Moreno Valley RIV091004 In Western Riverside Co. in the City of Moreno Valley - Cactus Ave Widening: Widen Cactus Ave from 2 to 4 through lanes (2 in ea dir), from Lasselle St to Nason St. Other improvements include the installation of a dedicated right turn lane, a 2-way left turn lane, bus turn -outs, landscaping & sidewalks. Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP Palm Springs RIV110124 In the Coachella Valley in the city of Palm Springs - Ramon Rd. Widening between San Luis Rey Dr & Landau Blvd: Widening of Ramon Rd. from a 4-Ln arterial to a 6-Ln arterial (3-Lns in ea dir) between San Luis Rey Dr & Landau Blvd., including the widening/replacement of the Whitewater River Bridge (Bridge No. 56CO287), including seismic retrofit and scour countermeasures as necessary. Reprogramming of HBP per 10/29/2012 update. Palm Springs RIV990727 In Palm Springs: Widen Indian Canyon Dr from 2 to 6 lanes (3 in each direction), from UPRR overcrossing to Garnet Ave (HBRR#:56C0025). Cost decrease per HBP funding update of 10/29/2012 Palm Springs RIV090405 In the City of Palm Springs: Replace existing 4-lane low water crossing on Vista Chino at Whitewater River with a new 4-lane bridge - bridge No. 00L0052. Reprogramming of HBP per 10/29/2012 update & Technical change, correcting RTP ID to be consistent with the 2012 RTP. 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 8 of 20 RCTC 2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 2 r Iw:. ;, . hn;i:i..ehT np�fa�br November 2012 SCAG approval: Dec. 19, 2012 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Palm Springs RIV031206 On S. Palm Canyon Dr. over Arenas Canyon South Drainage Channel: Replace existing 4 lane low- water crossing with a new 4-lane bridge, including drainage improvements consisting of levee channelization (HBRR #: OOL0027). Cost increase per HBP funding update of 10/29/2012. Rancho Mirage RIV110130 In Coachella Valley in Rancho Mirage - Widening of south bound Monterey Ave. from 2 to 3 lanes from Dinah Shore Dr to Gerald Ford Dr. (Approx. 3,480 L.F.). Other improvements include installation of curb and gutter, drainage improvements (retention basins), signing and striping, and traffic signal modification at Ginger Rogers Rd. Schedule Delay per latest project milestone report from the City of Rancho Mirage RCTC RIV041047 Throughout Riverside County - Grouped Projects for Transportation Enhancement Activities - Projects are consistent with 40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Tables 2 and 3 categories - Transportation Enhancement Activities (Except Rehabilitation and Operation of Historic Transportation Buildings, structures, or facilities). $398 in toll credits will be utilized for STPL match for cons in FY 2012/2013. Reprogramming of funds to re-establish the STIP STP-ENHANCE- RIP TEA funds, per RCTC discretion for utilization of TE reserve funds prior to June 30, 2013. TC utilization per Abijit Badge memo dated 12/12/2011. RCTC RIV050517 On SR74 in/near Hemet from Calvert Ave to California Ave: curve, median, & pavement widening (non -capacity) (EA ON3600). Cost increase and schedule delay per latest cost estimate RCTC RIV070308 At SR91/71 Jct: Replace EB 91 to NB 71 connector w/direct fly -over connector, and reconstruct the Green River Rd EB on -ramp (EA: OF541) ($1,501/$639/$200 toll credits will be used in PS&E to match DEMO-SAFETEALU/DEMO-TEA21/STP, respectively. $159 toll credits will be used in R/W to match DEMO-SAFETEALU.) Cost increase to include Surface Transportation Program - HR 4818 (idle earmark) for the r/w phase. RCTC RIV071250 On SR91/I-15: SR91 - Cons 1 MF Ln (SR71-115)/1 Aux Ln var Iocs (SR241-Pierce) (OC PM 14.43- 1891), CD System (2/3/4 Lns main-115), 1 toll Expr Ln (tel) &convert HOV to Tel ea dir (OC-115); I-15- const tel med dir connct NB15 to WB91 and EB91 to SB15, 1 tel ea dir SR91 dir connct-Ontario IC (115 PM 37.56-42.94). Cost increase /addition of Prop 1 B SLPP Formula Funds per CTC meeting of Dec. 5-6, 2012. RCTC RIV110122 On 1-215 in SW Riverside County from Murrieta Hot Springs Rd to 1-215/1-15 Junction, construct a third mixed flow lane southbound (widens 1-215/1-15 connector from 2 to 3 lanes). Technical Change to correctly include the PM miles before and after construction for signage and restriping through consultation with Caltrans. New PM pos miles are based on the agreed project construction foot print with Caltrans. RCTC RIV090902 On Interstate 215, from Blaine St SB off -ramp to 0.3 miles south of Martin Luther King Blvd Undercrossing(PM 40.2 to PM 42.5), extend the existing SB lane # 4 (lane drop) to 0.3 miles south of Martin Luther King Blvd undercrossing (EA ON890) ($230 toll credits used to match STPL in cons) Schedule Advance per current bid advertisement Riverside County RIV071259 In Eastern Coachella Valley - Mecca Community Roundabout: Construct a roundabout entry to the unincorporated Mecca Comm. On Hammond Rd & 4th St btwn 5th & 3rd Streets, consisting of a single In. traffic circle w/one bypass RT Ln for the SE traffic; mountable median aprons; landscaped center; S/W & Ped. X-ing; landscape buffer; realignment of Hammond Rd.; and an entry monument. Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP Riverside County RIV071285 In the Southeast Coachella Valley in Eastern Riverside County, just south of the City of Coachella on Ave. 56 (Airport Blvd) - from Polk St to the west to Orange St. to the east of the R/R X-ing: Replace existing 2 Ln (1 Ln in ea dir) at grade R/R X-ing with a 2 Ln OC (1 Ln in ea dir - non -capacity) across the UPRR tracks. Cost increase and schedule delay 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 9 of 20 2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 2 November 2012 RCTC iii Ilvenlde f ovah Umsronanan (m wskr SCAG approval: Dec. 19, 2012 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Riverside County RIV111003 In Western Riverside County in the city of Jurupa Valley - Market Street Bridge Replacement: Replace the existing two lane (one lane in each direction) Market Street Bridge over the Santa Ana River, 0.4 miles northwest of SR60 with a four lane (two lanes in each direction) bridge, Bridge No. 56C0024. Reprogramming of HBP per 10/29/2012 update. Riverside County RIV100105 In Western Riverside County - 1-15 at Indian Truck Trail IC: Widen Indian Truck Trail from 2 to 4 lanes, including dedicated left -turn lanes to NB and SB on ramp; widening of the SB exit ramp from 1 to 3 lanes; and widening of the NB exit ramp and entry ramp from 1 to 3 lanes plus intersection improvements at Temescal Cyn Rd. Technical Change to Correct RTP ID, per approved 2012 RTP Number of Projects 23 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx As of May 13, 2013 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 10 of 20 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 3�=--• January 2013 Winkle `ou""y°'°°°"o"'`°�'"r FHWA approval: Mar. 13, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason CALTRANS RIVLS12 Grouped projects for emergency repair - SHOPP Emergency Response Program: Projects are consistent w/40 CFR Part 93.126 Exempt Table 2 - Repair damage caused by natural disasters, civil unrest, or terrorist acts. Applies to damages that do not qualify for fed emergency relief funds or to damages that qualify for fed emergency relief funds but extend beyond the federally declared disaster period. New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -Addition of EA 1 C780 to FY 2012/2013 Federal Lands Highway Divison RIV130101 REHABILITATE APPROXIMATELY 0.5 MILES OF THE PACIFIC COAST TRAIL - FULLERS RIDGE TRAIL BETWEEN SEVEN PINES TRAIL AND DEER SPRINGS TRAIL IN MOUNT SAN JACINTO STATE PARK. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITES INCLUDE BRUSHING AND CLEARING, SWITCHBACKS, ARMORING, ROCK RETAINING WALLS, DRAINAGE LENSES, AND TRAIL CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION (PART OF MAP-21 BILL). New Project programmed at the request of State of California - Natural Resources Agency -Dept of Parks and Recreation Indio RIV091208 IN COACHELLA VALLEY IN THE CITY OF INDIO - JACKSON ST TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALL: INSTALL A NEW TS AT JACKSON ST & MARKET ST/DILLON AVE., & INSTALL. OF A WIRELESS INTERCONNECT SYSTEM ON JACKSON ST BTWN AVE. 44 TO THE NO. & AVE. 45 TO THE SO., A DISTANCE OF APROX. 1 MILE. INTERCONNECT SYSTEM INCLUDES 2 EXIST. TS & 1 NEW TS ($38 TOLL CREDITS USED FOR CMAQ MATCH IN CONS). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years La Quinta RIV121202 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA - ON DUNE PALMS RD: REPLACE 3-LANE LOW WATER CROSSING WITH 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER THE COACHELLA VALLEY STORMWATER CHANNEL ( WHITEWATER RIVER - BRIDGE NO.00L0070) New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -per 10/29/2012 HBP update RCTC RIV071250 On SR91/I-15: SR91 - Cons 1 MF Ln (SR71-115)/1 Aux Ln var locs (SR241-Pierce) (OC PM 14.43- 18.91), CD System (2/3/4 Lns main-115), 1 toll Expr Ln (tel) & convert HOV to Tel ea dir (0C-115); I 15-const tel med dir connct NB15 to WB91 and EB91 to SB15, 1 tel ea dir SR91 dir connct-Ontario IC (115 PM 37.56-42.94). Cost increase to include latest cost estimate. RCTC RIV090601 REHABILITATION/RENOVATION OF METROLINK TRACK, SIGNALS, COMMUNICATIONS, STRUCTURES, FACILITIES, SYSTEMS, & ROLLING STOCK. UTILIZATION OF TOLL DEVELOPMENT CREDITS TO MATCH FTA 5307 & FTA5309(A) IN CONSTRUCTION IS AS FOLLOWS: $245 IN FY 11 FOR FTA 5307 AND 5309(A); $251 IN FY 12 FOR FTA 5307; $502 IN FY 13 FOR FTA 5309(A); AND $522 IN FY 14 FOR FTA 5309A. Description change to clarify that rolling stock rehabilitation/renovation includes replacement of locomotives with Tier-4 technology and deprogramming of FTA 5309a FY's 13 and 14. Original 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 11 of 20 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 3 January 2013 Coomisslor FHWA approval: Mar. 13, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Riverside RIV071271 IN RIVERSIDE ON STREETER AVENUE: REPLACE EXISTING 4 LANE (2 LNS IN EA DIR) R/R X- ING WITH A 4 LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) U.C. GRADE SEPARATION ON STREETER AVE BETWEEN LANTANA ST AND BEATTY DR., AND INSTALL APPROX. 1,000 FT OF PCC S/W ON EACH SIDE OF STREETER AVENUE WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. Cost decrease per latest engineer's estimate. Riverside RIV071272 IN RIVERSIDE ON RIVERSIDE AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4-LANE (2 LNS IN EA DIR) R/R/ X-ING WITH A 4 LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) U.C. G. S. ALONG RIVERSIDE AVE BTWN MERRILL AVE AND 400FT N/O ELIZABETH ST. ADD IMP INCLUDE INSTALLATION OF APPROX 1,100 FT OF PCC S/W ON EACH SIDE OF RIVERSIDE AVE WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS ($791 TC IN FY09/10 & $151 TC IN FY12/13 USED TO MATCH STPL IN R/W) Cost increase per latest engineer's estimate Riverside County RIV121203 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY - ON AVE 56/AIRPORT DR, REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER WHITEWATER RIVER .21 MILES E/O HWY 111 (BRIDGE N0.56C0020). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -per 10/29/2012 HBP update Riverside County RIV121204 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE NEWLY INCORPORATED CITY OF EASTVALE - ON HAMNER AVE OVER SANTA ANA RIVER .5 MILES N/O OF SIXTH STREET, REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 6 LANE BRIDGE (BRIDGE N0.56C0446). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -per 10/29/2012 HBP update Temecula 991206 BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD EXTENSIONS: EXTEND MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS RD (4 LNS) FROM BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD TO SERAPHINA RD; BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD (4 LNS) FROM RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD TO MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS RD; & NICHOLAS RD (4 LNS) FROM BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. TO CALLE GIRASOL New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years -Cost increase Temecula RIV031215 Frech Valley Pkwy IC/Arterial Phases: Construct 6 Ln IC (Jefferson to Ynez) & ramps, NB/SB aux In, CD Lns (3 Ins NB&SB) & modify Winchester Rd IC (1-215 PM: 8.43-9.75) (EA:43270). Cost increase per latest engineer's estimate Temecula 991202 French Valley Pkwy (FVP) Phase I: Design & Construct FVP 2 through lanes arterial westbound from 1-15 to Jefferson Ave, construct FVP SB exit ramp (1 lane), SB aux lane (from FVP IC to Winchester Rd IC) & widen Winchester Rd IC SB exit ramp (1 to 3 Ins) (EA: 43270). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years and cost decrease based on latest estimate Various Agencies RIV050201 IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY GROUPED PROJECTS FOR BRIDGE REHABILITATION AND RECONSTRUCTION - HBP PROGRAM; PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 CATEGORIES -WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES (NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES). TC UTILIZATION: $649 IN 11/12 FOR CONS; $190 IN 12/13 FOR PE; $18 IN 15/16 FOR R/W; $2 IN 16/17 FOR R/W; $871 IN 16/17 FOR CONS; & $192 IN 17/18 Cost increase per 10/29/2012 HBP funding update. Number of Projects 14 Original As of May 13, 2013 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 12 of 20 2013 FTIP - RTP Consistency Amendment No. 1/Amendment No. 4 January 2013 il` ., avortide toudv 00. commwiir Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Riverside County RIV110302 ON I-10 IN THE CITY OF BLYTHE - PROVIDE NEW W/B ON AND W/B OFF RAMPS TO HOBSON WAY APPROX 1,800' W/O EXISTING RAMPS TO RIVIERA DR/INSPECTION STATION. THE NEW RAMPS WILL REPLACE EXISTING CONNECTION TO RIVIERA DR. Description change, Beginning PM Limits change, modeling changes and reprogramming of funds. Number of Projects 1 As of May 13, 2013 Original 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 13 of 20 2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 5+`::•; February 2013 '� RCTC _,,,,_ SCAG approval: Feb. 21, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Beaumont RIV050535 ON SR60 BETWEEN JACK RABBIT TR & SR60/1-10 JCT: PH1-CONSTRUCT NEW POTRERO 6 LN OC (3 LNS EACH DIR) W/TEMP CONNECT TO WESTERN KNOLLS (EA34141). PH2: NEW IC ON/OFF RAMPS. CONSTRUCT WB/EB EXIT &ENTRY RAMPS (2 LNS) & WB/EB LOOP ENTRY RAMPS (2 LNS) (ENTRY RAMPS INCL HOV LANE), INCL EB/WB AUX LNS AT EXIT RAMPS, REALIGN WESTERN KNOLLS AVE, AND REMOVE WESTERN KNOLLS AVE CONNECTION TO SR60 (EA34142). Cost Increase per latest cost estimate and incorporation of 2011 FTIP A-30 changes (2006 AAA Idle Earmark replaced with STPL) and transfer of STPL (Formerly TE) from San Timoteo Canyon Bike and Pedestrian Facilities to SR60/Potrero IC per TAC approval of Dec 10, 2012 Caftans RIV120201 ON SR-60 NEAR BEAUMONT: CONSTRUCT NEW EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND TRUCK FROM GILMAN SPRINGS RD TO 1.6 MILES WEST OF JACK RABBIT TRAIL (EA: ON690)AND UPGRADE EXISTING INSIDE AND OUTSIDE SHOULDER IN THE WB DIRECTION TO STANDARD WIDTHS (5-FT INSIDE SHOULDER AND 10-FT OUTSIDE SHOULDER) (EA: 0Q180). Cost decrease to deprogram CMAQ PE funds -CMAQ PE funds replaced (obligated) with idle earmarks on 12/10/2012. replaced Cost decrease needed to match Coop -Agreement. Caltrans RIVLS01 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS - SHOPP COLLISION REDUCTION PROGRAM: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT W/ 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2&3 - W RR/HY CROSSING, SAFER NON -FED -AID SYSTEM RDS, SHOULDR IMPRVMNTS, TRAFFIC CNTRL DEVICES/OPERATING ASSIST OTHER THAN SIGNALS, INTERSCTN SIGNAL PRJCTS AT INDVL INTERSCTNS, PVMNT MARKING DEMO, TCL OUTSIDE THE UA, LIGHTING IMPRVMNTS, EMERGENCY TRUCK PULLOVERS Cost Increase - EA ON510 increased and addition of new EA's OR750 and OR950. PERRIS RIV011205 IN PERRIS - WIDEN PERRIS BLVD 2 TO 6 LANES FROM RAMONA EXPRESSWAY TO PERRIS VALLEY STORM DRAIN - LATERAL 'B'(APPROX. 1 MILE), INCLUDING CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, RAISED MEDIAN, SIGNAL WORK, UTILITY RELOCATIONS, AND MINOR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate and notificaton from city of Perris regarding defederalizing the project. RCTC RIV041047 THROUGHOUT RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES (EXCEPT REHABILITATION AND OPERATION OF HISTORIC TRANSPORTATION BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, OR FACILITIES). $236 IN TOLL CREDITS WILL BE UTILIZED TO MATCH STPL/STP ENHANCE -RIP TEA CONS Cost Decrease to reflect the transfer from the San Timoteo Canyon Bike and Pedestrian facilities to the SR60/Potrero IC per TAC approval of Dec. 10, 2012. RCTC RIV520109 Reconstruct & Upgrade San Jacinto Branch Line for rail passenger service (Riverside to Perris) (Perris Valley Line) (FY 07 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN) ($330 Toll Credits to match CMAQ in Cons FY 12/13: $865 toll credits to partially match CMAQ ($7,543) in cons FY 13/14; and $6,076 toll credits to match STP-RIP in Cons FY 12/13). Project not to utilize toll credits RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIV031202 1-10 BYPASS SOUTH: CONSTRUCT TWO LANES OF ROADWAY TO PROVIDE A BY- PASS/NETWORK FACILITY FOR THE 1-10, APPROX. 1/2 MILE S/O 1-10 BETWEEN THE EASTERN END OF THE CITY OF BANNING AND APACHE TRAIL IN CABAZON. OTHER IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEVERAL LOW-WATER CROSSINGS AT SMITH CREEK AND SAN GORGONIO RIVER (PA&ED). Description change to refer to the federal earmark for the Ramsey St. Extension to meet the intent of the legislation for the project funding. RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIV060123 IN NORTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY ON CLAY ST FROM APPROX 100"SW OF GENERAL DR TO APPROX 500" N/O LINARES AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4-LANE (2 LNS IN EACH DIRECTION) AT GRADE R/R X-ING WITH A 4-LN (2 LNS IN EACH DIRECTION - NON -CAPACITY) UNDERCROSSING (UPRR). Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate. 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 14 of 20 RCTC 2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 5 `ip ; . ,k .-. n:�b. covey Madan io�ior February 2013 SCAG approval: Feb. 21, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIV071278 IN NORTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY ON MAGNOLIA AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4 LANE (2 LNS IN EA. DIR) R/R X-ING WITH A 4-LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) O.C. GRADE SEPARATION ON MAGNOLIA AVE BTWN BUCHANAN AVE. (ON THE EAST) AND LINCOLN STREET (ON THE WEST). Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate. Due to Programming Capacity issues, STPL will be obligated through the EPSP process. RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIV071285 IN THE SOUTHEAST COACHELLA VALLEY IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY, JUST SOUTH OF THE CITY OF COACHELLA ON AVE. 56 (AIRPORT BLVD) - FROM POLK ST TO THE WEST TO ORANGE ST. TO THE EAST OF THE R/R X-ING: REPLACE EXISTING 2 LN (1 LN IN EA DIR) AT GRADE R/R X-ING WITH A 2 LN OC (1 LN IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) ACROSS THE UPRR TRACKS. Cost Increase per latest engineer's estimate. RIVERSIDE COUNTY RIV060124 IN BANNING ON SUNSET AVE AT I-10 FROM S/O RAMSEY ST TO S/O LINCOLN ST: LOWER SUNSET AVE TO CONSTRUCT NEW 4-LANE UC AT UPRR CROSSING (NON -CAPACITY) AND RECONSTRUCT THE 1-10 IC RAMPS TO MEET THE NEW STREET GRADE (SAFETEA-LU CA438, #1261) (EA:33471) Cost decrease and reprogramming of funds to reflect the latest TCIF cost estimate and approved funding. Due to CMAQ capacity issues, RCTC Programmed CMAQ AC in FY 14/15 utilizing LOCAL AC Riverside Transit Agency RIV091211 GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OF THE FLEET: PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PURCHASE OF NEW BUSES AND RAIL CARS TO REPLACE EXISTING VEHICLES OR FOR MINOR EXPANSIONS OF THE FLEET. Cost Increase per approved 2012/2013 SRTP A-1, and inclusion of new FTA 5308 grant funds. TEMECULA 991203 EXTEND OVERLAND DRIVE (4 LANES) FROM COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE TO AVENIDA ALVARADO/DIAZ ROAD INTERSECTION INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION OF 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER MURRIETA CREEK Description Change to include "To Be Implemented in Phases" Reprogramming of design and construction from FY 2013/2014 to FY 2014/2015. Add funds in FY 2012/2013 per City of Temecula's request of 12/20/2012 TEMECULA RIV060113 CONSTRUCT NEW 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER MURRIETA CREEK (PART OF WESTERN BYPASS CORRIDOR) INCLUDING APPROACHES, CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, & STORM DRAIN FACILITIES Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate. TEMECULA RIV62029 AT HWY 79 SO AND LA PAZ ST: ACQUIRE LAND, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT PARK -AND -RIDE LOT - 157 SPACES. Cost Decrease per latest engineer's estimate. Number of Projects 15 As of May 13, 2013 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 15 of 20 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 6•+, March 2013 Ihnttle 6,Ei pe,or d. o.nu o, FHWA approval: Apr. 18, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Beaumont RIV060115 AT I-10/OAK VALLEY PKWY IC: RECONSTRUCT/WIDEN IC FROM 2 TO 6 THROUGH LANES FROM APPROX 500' W/O DESERT LAWN DR TO GOLF CLUB DR, WIDEN RAMPS - EB ENTRY 1 TO 2 LANES, EB & WB EXIT 1 TO 4 LANES, WB ENTRY 1 TO 3 LANES, , ADD NEW EB/WB ENTRY LOOP RAMPS (2 LANES) , ENTRY RAMPS INCLUDE HOV PREFERENTIAL LANE, AND RAMPS INCLUDE EXTENDED ACCELERATION/DECELERATION LANE (EA: OG280). Reprogramming of design, RM/ and construction, per City of Beaumont's request of 12/17/2012. Completion year (model year) remains 2018. Murrieta RIV071277 ON 1-215 AT LOS ALAMOS RD IC - INSTALL LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS TO THE I-215/LOS ALAMOS ROAD INTERCHANGE (SAFETEA-LU 2005 SEC. 1702. HPP #3140). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years. PALM SPRINGS RIV071258 IN THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS — TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CENTER: ADVANCE THE INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL TIMING TO BE UNIFIED CITYWIDE, COORDINATE THE COMM. EQUIP., BRINGING THEM ALL ONTO THE SAME COMM. PLATFORM FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF COMPLETE DATA & DISSEMINATION OF INFO. TO THE PUBLIC. Reprogramming of CMAQ construction funds to FY 2014/2015 (programming capacity issues); CMAQ funding will be obligated in FY 2012/2013 utilizing the EPSP in place. Toll Credits will be utilized to satisfy the CMAQ match in construction. Perris RIV091012 IN MID -WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF PERRIS - CASE ROAD/MATTHEWS RD. (SR-74) AT I-215 INTERCHANGE: RECONFIGURATION OF THE EXISTING CASE RD/MATTHEWS RD. (SR-74) AT I-215 IC, IMPROVING THE INTERSECTION OPERATIONS AND ELIMINATING CROSS TRAFFIC CONFLICTS ON THE SB RAMPS, WIDEN MATTHEWS RD FROM 2/3 LANES TO 4 LANES FROM CASE RD TO TRUMBLE RD (EA: OP420). Reprogramming of R/W and Construction, per current schedule. Completion date changes from 2016 to 2018 but model year remains 2018. RCTC RIV520109 RECONSTRUCT & UPGRADE SAN JACINTO BRANCH LINE FOR RAIL PASSENGER SERVICE (RIVERSIDE TO PERRIS) (PERRIS VALLEY LINE) (FY 07 5307) (UZA: RIV-SAN). Reprogramming CMAQ Funds and Measure A Match from FY 2011/2012 to FY 2014/2015. EPSP will be utilized for obligation in FY 2012/2013. Riverside County RIV060124 IN BANNING ON SUNSET AVE AT I-10 FROM S/O RAMSEY ST TO S/O LINCOLN ST: LOWER SUNSET AVE TO CONSTRUCT NEW 4-LANE UC AT UPRR CROSSING (NON -CAPACITY) AND RECONSTRUCT THE 1-10 IC RAMPS TO MEET THE NEW STREET GRADE (SAFETEA-LU CA438, #1261) (EA:33471) Reprogramming to eliminate the AC and to allow CMAQ obligation for construction in FY 12/13, utilizing the Expedited Project Selection Process. Riverside Transit Agency RIV050553 IN TEMECULA FOR RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY - CONSTRUCT NEW TEMECULA/MURRIETA TRANSIT CENTER - LOCATION UNDER STUDY (04, 05, 06, 07, E-2006-091, E-2007-0131, & 2008- BUSP-0131, SAFETEA-LU). New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years. Description modified to include correct earmark. Riverside Transit Agency RIV130201 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF RIVERSIDE - REGIONAL TRANSIT CENTER FOR MASS TRANSIT SERVICE IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED (PA&ED ONLY) New PA&ED Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years. Number of Projects 8 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM As of May 13, 2013 Page 16 of 20 RCTC 2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 8q Ilvtas Couch La orladonWinfttk- April 2013 SCAG approval: Apr. 25, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason BEAUMONT RIV050535 ON SR60 BTWN JACK RABBIT TR & SR60/1-10 JCT: PH1-CONST. NEW POTRERO 6 LN OC (3 LNS EACH DIR) W/TEMP CONNECT TO WESTERN KNOLLS (EA34141/34143). PH2: NEW IC ON/OFF RAMPS. CONST. WB/EB EXIT & ENTRY RAMPS (2 LNS) & WB/EB LOOP ENTRY RAMPS (2 LNS) (ENTRY RAMPS INCL HOV LANE), INCL EB/WB AUX LNS AT EXIT RAMPS, REALIGN WESTERN KNOLLS AVE, AND REMOVE WESTERN KNOLLS AVE CONNECTION TO SR60 (EA34142/34143). Minor Change to the project description to add the new EA of 34143 for both Ph. 1 and Ph II. Coachella RIV071246 IN CITY OF COACHELLA — CONSTRUCT NEW (NON -CAPACITY) AVE 52 GRADE SEPARATION OVERHEAD STRUCTURE SPANNING OVER UPRR MAINLINE TRACKS AND GRAPEFRUIT BLVD/HWY 111, FROM SHADY LN TO APPROX 600 FT. E/O INDUSTRIAL WAY/TYLER ST. IMPROVEMENTS INCL: RECONFIG CONNECTION FROM AVE 52 TO GRAPEFRUIT BLVD/HWY 111, BIKE LNS, SIDEWALKS, RETAINING WALLS, RECONST TRAFFIC SIGS/DRIVEWAYS, REMOVE EXISTING AT -GRADE CR Technical Change, reclassified from State Route to Local HY. W from relinquishment that took place April 2002. Corona RIV011240 IN CORONA ON EXISTING MCKINLEY ST - CONSTRUCT GRADE SEPARATION AT BNSF RAILROAD CROSSING (PROJECT STUDY REPORT & PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS REPORT ACTIVITIES) Cost increase per latest engineer's estimate. Lake Elsinore RIV111203 IN LAKE ELSINORE - TEMESCAL CANYON RD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT/WIDENING: REPLACE TEMESCAL CANYON RD. 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER TEMESCAL WASH, 0.22 MI. W/O LAKE STREET (BRIDGE NO. 56C0050). Reprogramming of funds per 3/26/2013 HBP update. Moreno Valley RIV090117 IN MORENO VALLEY AT SR60/NASON ST IC: WIDEN NASON ST OC FROM 2 TO 4 THROUGH LANES FROM ELDER AVE TO FIR AVE (EA: 32302) AC Conversion and incorporation of actual allocation/obligation funding in FY 11/12. STPL funding adjustments are needed to open up capacity for RCTC in FY 13/14. Palm Springs RIV031206 ON S. PALM CANYON DR OVER ARENAS CANYON SOUTH DRAINAGE CHANNEL: REPLACE EXISTING 4 LANE LOW-WATER CROSSING WITH A NEW 4-LANE BRIDGE, INCLUDING DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS CONSISTING OF LEVEE CHANNELIZATION (HBRR #: 00L0027). Cost decrease per 3/26/2013 HBP update. RCTC RIV070309 ON 1-215 IN SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY FROM SCOTT RD TO NUEVO RD IC: CONSTRUCT A MIXED FLOW LANE IN EACH DIRECTION AND RECONSTRUT AUX LANES BETWEEN D ST IC AND NUEVO RD IC (EA: OF162) Funding changes per CTC financial allocation amendment for Prop 1 B CMIA and STIP-RIP Riverside County RIV031202 1-10 BYPASS SOUTH (FORMERLY RAMSEY ST. EXT.): CONSTRUCT TWO LANES OF ROADWAY TO PROVIDE A BY-PASS/NETWORK FACILITY FOR THE 1-10, APPROX. 1/2 MILE S/O 1-10 BETWEEN THE EASTERN END OF THE CITY OF BANNING AND APACHE TRAIL IN CABAZON. OTHER IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE THE CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE CROSSINGS AT SMITH CREEK AND SAN GORGONIO RIVER. Description change to remove SEVERAL LOW WATER and (PA&ED) language. Schedule delay per latest project update. Riverside County RIV060123 IN NORTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY ON CLAY ST FROM APPROX 100"SW OF GENERAL DR TO APPROX 500" N/O LINARES AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4-LANE (2 LNS IN EACH DIRECTION) AT GRADE R/R X-ING WITH A 4-LN (2 LNS IN EACH DIRECTION - NON -CAPACITY) UNDERCROSSING (UPRR). Cost increase and schedule delay per latest engineer's estimate. 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 17 of 20 2013 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 8 April 2013 1 y' =, RCTC Heide CaioMTmwort*an Co nmblor SCAG approval: Apr. 25, 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Riverside County RIV071288 IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE CO. IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY — 66TH AVE GRADE SEPARATION: CONSTRUCT A TWO-LN (1-LN IN EA DIR) 66TH AVE ELEVATED STRUCTURE OVER THE UPRR, HAMMOND RD., AND SH-111., FROM WESTERLY OF LINCOLN ST TO JOHNSON ST ON THE EAST IN THE COMMUNITY OF MECCA. ADD. IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO TIE BACK INTO THE EXISTING ALIGNMENT. Reprogram funding years to reflect current project schedule Riverside Transit Agency RIV120826 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - OPERATING ASSISTANCE: FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A -RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 - FY 13) (UZA: HEMET) Cost decrease per latest revisions to FTA 5311 Regional Apportionments for Operating Assistance and removing incorrect funds from SRTP table 4 programmed on this project. Sunline Transit Agency RIV120804 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY — FIXED ROUTE AND DIAL -A -RIDE OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 (FTA 5307 — FY 13) (UZA: INCCPS). Cost increase per latest revisions to FTA 5311 Regional Apportionments for Operating Assistance. Temecula RIV62031 I-15/SR79 SO. IC: REMOVE SB EXIT RAMP, ADD NEW SB EXIT LOOP RAMP, REALIGN SB EXIT RAMP (2 LNS) W/AUX LN. WIDEN SB ENTRY 1 TO 3, NB EXIT 1 TO 4, NB ENTRY 1 TO 3 & RECON SR79S. Schedule delay is due to scope in R/W acquisition. Temecula RIV031215 FRENCH VALLEY PKWY IC/ARTERIAL PHASES: CONSTRUCT 6 LN IC (JEFFERSON TO YNEZ) & RAMPS, NB/SB AUX LN, CD LNS (3 LNS NB&SB) & MODIFY WINCHESTER RD IC (1-215 PM: 8.43-9.75) (EA:43270) Fund Source Change per Abhijit Badge direction to SCAG on 2/20/2013 Various Agencies RIV050201 IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY GROUPED PROJECTS FOR BRIDGE REHABILITATION AND RECONSTRUCTION - HBP PROGRAM; PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 CATEGORIES - WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES (NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES). TC UTILIZATION:$190 IN 12/13 FOR PE; $18 IN 15/16 FOR RNV; $2 IN 16/17 FOR R/W; $871 IN 16/17 FOR CONS; & $192 IN 17/18 Cost Decrease per 3/26/2013 HBP Lump Sum Update. Description change to adjust TC utilization, per HBP funding changes in FY 11/12. Number of Projects 15 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx As of May 13, 2013 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 18 of 20 RCTC 2013 FTIP -Formal Amendment No. 9 ,.:. , _„ ,,,,,;,,, May 2013 thenidoCooly T'"°ponationb Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Rancho Mirage RIV110130 IN COACHELLA VALLEY IN RANCHO MIRAGE - WIDENING OF SOUTH BOUND MONTEREY AVE. FROM 2 TO 3 LANES FROM DINAH SHORE DR TO GERALD FORD DR. (APPROX. 3,480 L.F.). OTHER IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE INSTALLATION OF CURB AND GUTTER, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS (RETENTION BASINS), SIGNING AND STRIPING, AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION AT GINGER ROGERS RD. Cost Increase per latest engineer's estimate Riverside RIV071272 IN RIVERSIDE ON RIVERSIDE AVE: REPLACE EXISTING 4-LANE (2 LNS IN EA DIR) R/R/ X-ING WITH A 4 LN (2 LNS IN EA DIR - NON -CAPACITY) U.C. G. S. ALONG RIVERSIDE AVE BTN W MERRILL AVE AND 400FT N/O ELIZABETH ST. ADD IMP INCLUDE INSTALLATION OF APPROX 1,100 FT OF PCC S/W ON EACH SIDE OF RIVERSIDE AVE WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS ($791 TC IN FY09/10 & $151 TC IN FY12/13 USED TO MATCH STPL IN R/W) Cost Increase and Schedule Delay, per Baseline Agreement Amendment and Financial TCIF allocation approval of 5/7/2013. Removal of STPL funds in FY 2012/2013 per engineer's latest estimate for R/W. Removal of TC language in Description due to removal of STPL in FY 2012/2013 Riverside County Transportation Commission RIV130401 THROUGHOUT WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION. New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years Riverside County Transportation Commission RIV130402 THROUGHOUT EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION. New Project in the 2013 FTIP Quadrennial Years Riverside County Transportation Commission RIV031218 IN WESTERN RIV CO - NEW MID CO PKWY: CONS 6 THRU LN (3 LNS IN EA DIR) APPROX 16 MI. BTWN 1-215 IN PERRIS EAST TO SR79 IN SAN JACINTO, INC. CONS/RECONS OF APPROX 10 ICs, ADD OF AUX LN REDLANDS-EVANS & EB AUXILIARY LN EVANS-ANTELOPE. 1-215 IMP: ADD 1 MF LN IN EA DIR NUEVO RD -VAN BUREN BLVD, & 1 AUX LN IN EA DIR MID CO PKWY- CAJALCO/RAMONA EXP & FROM MID CO PKWY-NUEVO. Cost decrease to reflect latest engineer's estimate. Project fully funded -Construction funding programmed in the unconstrained years of the 2013 FTIP. Riverside County Transportation Commission RIV031218 IN WESTERN RIV CO - NEW MID CO PKWY: CONS 6 THRU LN (3 LNS IN EA DIR) APPROX 16 MI. BTWN 1-215 IN PERRIS EAST TO SR79 IN SAN JACINTO, INC. CONS/RECONS OF APPROX 10 ICs, ADD OF AUX LN REDLANDS-EVANS & EB AUXILIARY LN EVANS-ANTELOPE. 1-215 IMP: ADD 1 MF LN IN EA DIR NUEVO RD -VAN BUREN BLVD, & 1 AUX LN IN EA DIR MID CO PKWY- CAJALCO/RAMONA EXP & FROM MID CO PKWY-NUEVO. Cost decrease to reflect latest engineer's estimate. Project fully funded -Construction funding programmed in the unconstrained years of the 2013 FTIP. Caltrans RIV120201 ON SR-60 NEAR BEAUMONT: CONSTRUCT NEW EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND TRUCK LANES FROM GILMAN SPRINGS RD TO 1.6 MILES WEST OF JACK RABBIT TRAIL (EA: ON690)AND UPGRADE EXISTING INSIDE AND OUTSIDE SHOULDER IN THE WB DIRECTION TO STANDARD WIDTHS (5-FT INSIDE SHOULDER AND 10-FT OUTSIDE SHOULDER) (EA: 0Q180). Minor change to eliminate former EA ON690 and 00180 and replacethem with the new EA ON69U. Correction to the standard shoulder width - inside shoulder changed from 5-ft to the Caltrans Std. of 10-ft. Riverside Transit Agency RIV130501 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM OPERATING ASSISTANCE: COMMUTER LINK SERVICES - ROUTES 212 AND 217 (UZAs: HEM/SAN JAC + TEM/MURR) (FTA 5316, FY'S 11 AND 12) New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Cycle Program Projects. Third Universal Call for ProJ g Riverside Transit Agency RIV130502 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA: TRAVEL TRAINING PROGRAM (FTA 5317, FY'S 11 AND 12). New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 19 of 20 RCTC 2013 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 9.,,,;,,, ii..4.iownr 6.ca� - May 2013 Agency Project ID Title Update Reason Riverside Transit Agency RIV130503 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA - JOB ACCESS & REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM: EXTENDED SERVICE PROGRAM (FTA 5316, FY'S 11 AND 12). New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle Riverside Transit Agency RIV130504 IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOR DIRECTLY OPERATED TRANSPORTATION SERVICES - SPECIALIZED NON -EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (FTA 5317, FY'S 11 AND 12). New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle Sunline Transit Agency RIV130505 IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - JOB ACCESS & REVERSE COMMUTE PROJECT: REALIGNMENT AND EXPANSION OF SERVICE FROM INDIO TO COACHELLA, MECCA AND THE NORTH SHORE, CONNECTING COMMUTERS TO OTHER EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMUNITIES (FTA 5316 FY'S 11 AND 12). New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Universal Call for Projects Sunline Transit A enc g y RIV130506 IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY —JOB ACCESS & REVERSE COMMUTE AND NEW FREEDOM PROJECT: EXPRESS SERVICE TO THE PASS AREA WITH SERVICE TO CABAZON, BANNING AND BEAUMONT, MORENO VALLEY, AND RIVERSIDE, CONNECTING COACHELLA VALLEY COMMUTERS TO WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY (FTA 5316 AND FTA 5317, FY'S 11 AND 12). New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle Sunline Transit Agency RIV130507 IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - NEW FREEDOM PROJECTS LUMP SUM FOR NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS (CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND 3 )(FY 11 & 12 - 5316 & 5317). New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Universal Call for Projects. Third Pro Cycle gram y Sunline Transit Agency RIV130508 IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY FOR CVAG — JOB ACCESS & REVERSE COMMUTE PROGRAM: PROVIDE SHUTTLE SERVICE FOR THE HOMELESS SEEKING EMPLOYMENT - SHUTTLE SERVICE WILL PROVIDE CONNECTIONS TO SUNLINE BUS HUBS AND TO AREAS WHERE SUNLINE DOES NOT CURRENTLY SERVE. PROGRAM ALSO INCLUDES MOBILITY MANAGER (FTA 5316, FY'S 11 AND 12). New Project in 2013 Quadrennial Years from Transit 2013 Universal Call for Projects. Third Program Cycle Number of Projects 15 As of May 13, 2013 2013 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx 5/13/2013 - 2:21 PM Page 20 of 20 AGENDA ITEM 11 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 11. AGENDA ITEM 12 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 12. AGENDA ITEM 13 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 13.