HomeMy Public PortalAbout01 January 26, 2015 Technical advisory committeeCOMM-TAC-00036
TIME:
DATE:
LOCATION:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA*
*Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda.
10:00 A.M.
January 26, 2015
Riverside County Transportation Commission
4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special
assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact the Riverside County Transportation Commission
at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that
reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting.
1. Call to Order
2. Self -Introductions
3. Approval of November 17, 2014 Minutes
4. Public Comments (This is for comments on items not listed on agenda. Comments
relating to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is before the Committee.)
5. Election of Officers
6. Measure A Projections and Other Measure A Matters
a. FY 2014/15 Mid -Year Revenue Projections, Measure A, LTF, TUMF
(Attachment)
b. FY 2015/16 Revenue Projections, Measure A, LTF, TUMF (Attachment)
c. Measure A Allocation Calculation Formula (Verbal Presentation)
7. 2015 Legislative Platform and Preview (Attachment)
8. State CAP and Trade Funding and Disadvantaged Communities (Attachment)
9. 2015 FTIP Update (Attachment)
10. 2015 Draft Obligation Delivery Plan (Attachment)
11. Active Transportation Program (ATP) Updates (Attachment)
12. SB 821 Revamped Guidelines and Announcement for Call for Projects (Verbal
Presentation)
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
January 26, 2015
Page 2
13. CalRecycle Grant Opportunities for Tire Derived Aggregates (Verbal Presentation)
14. Standard Environmental Reference (Verbal Presentation)
15. Local Assistance Update (Verbal Presentation)
16. January Commission Meeting Highlights (Verbal Presentation)
17. Other Business
18. Adjournment (The next meeting will be March 16, 2015 in Beaumont.)
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 26, 2015 I AGENCY I TAC MEMBER BANNING DUANE BURK --i------ALTERNATE Kahono Oei PRINT NAME Director of Public Works BEAUMONT ---lc-HRiST-RACY--I Kelsey Gormley -u---r--1< e,VJtJ 1-j J6-hft5 Associate Planner Management Analyst f---------+-----=-~~-=--:--;--::-~~~--~F~r=an;;ik;-;-L·uckino-BLYTHE ARMANDO BALDIZZONE Director of Public Works CVAG CALIMESA Finance Director ---+--~-MICHAEL SHOBERG jAllyn Waggle !Transportation Program Manager 1Deputy Director ·---· ·-·------·-~~----·-·~---------+------MICHAEL THORNTON City Engineer Bob French Public Works Director SIGNATURE 7L~-~;z::~1-/----;. -·~ -;-I' /<:::.'--·-··· -··-··-~=::.~:'!...istance Engineer l fe<1n Yev '"'? J-~ j ::::i --lcANYON LAl'!7/faABIB -MOTLAGH~-ViCE CHAIR ---------------------1 CAL TRANS City Engineer CATHEDRAL CITY IBILL SIMONS Interim City Engineer COACHELLA 1JONATHAN HOY· CHAIR ---+-----------Maritza Martinez City Engineer Interim Public Works Director lcoRONA I NELSON NELSON --+-----"::::>--1 Robert Morin DESERT HOT SPRINGS Acting Public Works Director DANIEL PORRAS Contract Assistant City Engineer v Principal Civil Engineer Richard Kopecky Contract City Engineer (Z,~;Vt~ t>PrtJ ( ei Pd~ ~v ~~L
EASTVALE HEMET~-/ INDIAN WELLS INDIO ·1GEORGE ALVAREZ City Engineer i !HABIB MOTLAGH Interim City Engineer KEN SEUMALO Public Works Director GRANT EKLUND Public Works Director/City Engineer TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 26, 2015 Joe lndrawan lsondie Baker I Assistant Engineer II j(_~rJ )['~A-t.D ----Tom Rafferty Principal Civil Engineer JURUPA VALLEY IROY STEPHENSON I Mike Myers Public Works Director/City Engineer !Assistant City Engineer LA QUINTA !TIMOTHY JONASSON Y 2\;_r ~IM~ ~?I~ ~ [Public Works Director/City Engineer Principal Engineer ~ I ._l__ LAKE ELSINORE ATIESKANDARI ~ JRitaThompson Vt"' G-<-~~ ~-e,I ~/-r..___ Consultant Project Manager t (J."' h-2 < <-µ orJ<.> . -1 -/ 171 'IJ Ir(_ G.4--o .< __ _ MEN JONATHAN SMITH M. tJ.:jc't-: / , . , / Public Works Director/City Engineer .eity Ma1iager /,./\tJy'-f)::.1.<"". 7 j' 1?L(_ ( '-e, I J 1'1----4"'1< . A"'>'S J-c.~ u ""~~. =re 7, c-MORENO VALLEY I AHMAD ANSARI I Prem Kumar Public Works Director/City Engineer Deputy Public Works Director/ Assistant City Engineer I \ ~~ KvMJtV( MURRIETA NORCO BOB MOEHLING City Engineer .-..11e101e~tyManager -r~ \--#fi.e\u-l~-6-,_ BILL THOMPSON Lori Askew ~ Water and Sewer Manager Director of Public Works I LoR..t J . A-z,k:J=.~
PALM DESERT BO CHEN City Engineer / PALMSPR~ -----MARCUS FULLER Assistant City Manager/Engineer -PERRIS IHABIB MOTLAGH / City Engineer I--~""-IROHANKURUPPU ---RTA I I RANCHO MIRAGE BRUCE HARRY Director of Public Works RIVERSIY1TOM BOYD ~ , Public Works Director ·---RIVERSIDE COUNTY PATRICIA ROMO Assistant Director of Transportation SANJACINTY HABIB MOTLAGH City Engineer I SUNLINE JOE FORGIARINI Director of Transit Planning ---TEMECULA TOM GARCIA Public Works Director ~-WILDOMAR DAN YORK Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works/City Engineer ~-WR COG RUTHANNE TAYLOR BERGER Deputy Executive Director TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 26, 2015 Mark Diercks Transportation Engineer Savat Khamphou vv~----------·---------·~-----Bill Enos City Engineer __ -~ ;j;vvlk, l~""j H Farshid Mohammadi I ' 1 Engineering Manager _ _ _ _ __ Mojahed Salama ----·· -I /) 1-1-~ Greg Butler Assistant City Manager f cn-....._C,~r&t'( ~ b Janet Morales Administrative Assistant I I 1 I. '1.l I\ """' I _._)....., Donna Dean ---' --Program Manager ----·----------( ____ 4 \L\_ ------------7? - --
AGENCY TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 26, 2015 NAME TELEPHONE OR E-MAIL _(', 17/-c-r ~7c:;;,pcCt-lifu _1 ___ L%'Vf~L. --cJ-7_-'7/t/( I /-#~: atiP( _g~~fl~me-Ld!a' CYff !~ ((__ . J_ __ ~~--~~it v L ITi (> F R \'1~{2., ') l OE -m-t.A '-( f-..\,lw<A "{ E-t--1 h~~vj~il~w:._~~-~~l\. _· ~~-ov __ _ -~-(TC £t~ c-1:1~1_ .. {Jri_~---·------t----------------'-----------+----~'f "'"' I I -----· r n"' 11 E? re.. t 11'1"1 e.. . t!1 ""!-K..~ve1;,.;c:l..A., C-6u.nly r-t1J·~' \~,.fL Ct t ·-' --•. C. I c.. ' ' --' --\, . • . " " rr:.· ~---t ~... _,, , ' . ; t •.. J f:: IC j -i' v/r L-,,R. c /0 (YI () 6 c.\. \ °'-V\I\. ~ M S'.,,... \ 'l"""-....._(? f'C t\ ~.il' __ ~ .t:::r""·-1-.1---------f ·.r-;::,_ I------·~-I f-1 ~f!...v't ,J ~Gt=&:.;; f1/..~$c•e,12-1vc::_~u>e. Tfl-t>. ~~-,,_ ~~ ;-1 W/1CO G [)& ~ 7Je~ ole{.UJ@ w12.CoG · C6G .. CALUJ. ----------1--------------t--------·--·--·-··----------1 _____ q!"/4'f _ _53(,, 7~f /)l \ 1 _,,~,I /.)I 1 (__ VI 1r1 \ -!1e I'\ 1-jS ~~:_Je, c\i.":f. (A ',f:/ cAl __ I .,...,..-, w ~. i TWP IOW ,,,c.f,_, 1f>..:J gg-tJJl""'c.r0<!.a:-~""" ~ /'!_Jr__d_-__ fd-_{£~!:° W/// ~ c-4.,~,,r,.~ 5V/vr~-/.~~_c_~ _ __,
MINUTES
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
MINUTES
Monday, November 17, 2014
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Technical Advisory
Committee (TAC) was called to order at 10:01 a.m. at Beaumont City Hall, Conference Room #2,
550 East Sixth Street, Beaumont, CA.
2. SELF -INTRODUCTIONS
Members Present: Ahmad Ansari, City of Moreno Valley
Dave Barakian, City of Palm Springs
Bo Chen, City of Palm Desert
Donna Dean, WRCOG
Tom Garcia, City of Temecula
Kelsey Gormley, City of Beaumont
Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage
Jonathan Hoy, City of Coachella
Joe Indrawan, City of Eastvale
Prem Kumar, City of Moreno Valley
Bob Moehling, City of Murrieta
Farshid Mohammadi, City of Riverside
Victor Monz, City of Hemet
Habib Motlagh, Cities of Canyon Lake,
Perris and San Jacinto
Nelson Nelson, City of Corona
Kahono Oei, City of Banning
Daniel Porras, City of Desert Hot Springs
Tom Rafferty, City of Indio
Patricia Romo, County of Riverside
Ken Seumalo, City of Indian Wells
Michael Shoberg, CVAG
Michael Thornton, City of Calimesa
Sean Yeung, Caltrans
Others Present: Walter Allison, City of Lake Elsinore
Grace Alvarez, RCTC
Amer Attar, City of Temecula
Mark Chappell, CVAG
Shirley Gooding, RCTC
Jillian Guizado, RCTC
Eric Lewis, City of Moreno Valley
Rafael Martinez, City of Menifee
Shirley Medina, RCTC
Paul Rodriguez, RCG
Mojahed Salama, County of Riverside
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
November 17, 2014
Page 2
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/S/C to approve the minutes as submitted.
Abstain: Bruce Harry and Michael Shoberg
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
5. SB 743
Shirley Medina, RCTC, reported that Senate Bill 743 was passed. Its intent is to help with in -fill
projects to help go through CEQA more smoothly and exempt those types of projects. The Office of
Planning and Research (OPR) was charged to look at a methodology to help analyze traffic impacts.
They are focusing on vehicle miles travelled (VMT) and the reductions associated with projects in
reducing VMT since it also reduces greenhouse gas emissions. The focus was in transit priority
areas. The OPR is looking at expanding the use of VMT in CEQA analysis to outside the areas of
transit priority areas.
Ms. Medina provided an outline of RCTC's letter responding to the draft guidelines from the OPR
with the help of its attorneys. The letter is expected to be sent later this week. She responded to
various questions and invited comments from the TAC by November 21.
6. CAP AND TRADE FUNDING
Shirley Medina provided a Strategic Growth Council Affordable Housing and Sustainable
Communities presentation that was shown at several workshops. She said the final guidelines will
be available December 1. The Cap and Trade funding will provide $130 million statewide for Cycle 1,
mainly for transit and rail improvements combined with affordable housing.
7. 2013 FTIP/2015 FTIP UPDATES
Grace Alvarez, RCTC, reported that the 2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP)
will expire in mid -December. There were a total of 21 amendments totaling 309 project changes.
Staff will notify the TAC when the 2015 FTIP is approved. The 2015 FTIP already has Amendment
No. 1 and No. 2, a formal amendment and an administrative amendment, which included all the
ATP projects for the statewide and the MPO as well as new transit projects from the Short Range
Transit Plan and any other changes that were not part of the 2015 FTIP. The 2015 FTIP and
Amendment No. 1 will be approved by SCAG about mid -December. Amendment No. 2 will be
approved by about the end of December.
8. 2014 OBLIGATION AUTHORITY FINAL FFY 2013/14
Grace Alvarez announced the results of the federal fiscal year 2013/14 obligation delivery. $75.3M
of STP and CMAQ funds was obligated. The obligation authority (OA) was exceeded by $9.8 million.
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
November 17, 2014
Page 3
This year we will receive August redistribution in the amount of $2.4 million. She pointed out the
major projects funded in FFY 2013/14. She requested that the TAC update the project milestone
reports from which staff will prepare the obligation plan for the FFY 2014/15 that will be due to
Local Assistance in March or April 2015.
Ms. Medina reported that the majority of obligations occurred in the last quarter and she thanked
Sean Yeung and his team for getting the obligations done by the end of the fiscal year. She further
reported that the OA balance was exceeded by having projects that were ready to use the fund
balances from other counties that were under delivering.
9. 2016 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE
Ms. Alvarez stated that staff is working on finalizing the project changes that were submitted for the
2016 RTP. The document is due to SCAG November 28. It should be ready for public review in
October 2015. Regional council approval is anticipated in April 2016 with the final conformity
determination in June 2016.
SCAG also notified RCTC staff that changes to model and capacity enhancing projects will be allowed
through the 2015 FTIP consistency amendment, for those projects that have funding programmed
in the 2015 FTIP years. The anticipated approval is June 2016, concurrently with the 2016 RTP/SCS.
A few state highway projects have been identified for this consistency amendment and the project
sponsors have been notified of the opportunity to include the project changes through this
amendment. If there are similar local highway projects with scope of work changes and or schedule
delays, please contact Eric DeHate by Friday, November 21.
Ms. Medina added that the SCS component of the RTP has a lot of attention since it implements
SB 375 and helps to meet greenhouse gas reduction targets. There are projects that some of the
environmental community are concerned about, basically bicycle and transportation facilities. She
stated that a survey may be sent to the local agencies to determine what types of projects are
being funded with local resources and go unreported.
10. ATP UPDATE
Shirley Medina said the statewide call for projects was approved by the CTC in August and all the
project sponsors were notified. Staff has been working with project sponsors to get a schedule so
we can help with allocations. The MPO cycle was approved November 12 by the CTC.
Regarding the statewide pot, projects under $1 million would be likely to receive state funds. Staff
has not received any word from the CTC saying that would be the case. She said RCTC is
encouraging the CTC to look at the list Caltrans has prepared that identifies those projects that have
requested state only funds.
Cycle 2 of ATP is planned for March 2015 and will include two years of funding and approximately
the same amount of available funds.
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
November 17, 2014
Page 4
SCAG is planning a workshop in December for the ATP project sponsors on the MPO cycle. The
transportation commissions are working with SCAG to produce an agenda and RCTC will advise the
TAC when details are available.
11. SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM CHANGES
Jillian Guizado, RCTC, presented background information concerning the SB 821 evaluation criteria
to the TAC. Due to the age of the evaluation criteria, in particular the concern about the inequity
towards bicycle projects, and the advent of ATP, along with the possibility of incorporating
environmental justice into the program, a subcommittee of the TAC was formed in September 2013.
The subcommittee met five times in ten months and came up with two major changes to the
SB 821 program.
Ms. Guizado summarized key proposed changes to the SB 821 program, which are included in her
staff report, and responded to various questions.
M/S/C (Motlagh/Harry) approve staff's recommendation with the addition of 1) setting a
twenty percent cap on administrative/engineering expenses; and 2) require the
justification for the use of pavement to be explained in project proposals.
11. LOCAL ASSISTANCE UPDATE
Sean Yeung, Caltrans Local Assistance, extended an invitation to attend a free Protected Bicycle
Lanes training class hosted by Caltrans, District 7, on December 2 from 9:00 a.m. to noon, at 100 S.
Main Street, Los Angeles, Room 01.040B. The contact person is Dale Benson at (213) 897-2934.
Mr. Yeung announced an update to the Local Assistance procedures manual, chapter 6,
"Environmental Process." The update makes changes to the standard environmental reference
which includes four changes to the manual for the NEPA categorical exclusions (CE). Exhibit 6-E has
been replaced in its entirety, which took effect in the office bulletin No. 14-07 that was issued
earlier this month. When environmental submittals are evaluated, they will follow a new check
list. Patti Romo requested that someone from the environmental unit at Caltrans present the
changes to TAC at a future meeting. Mr. Yeung said he would make the request.
He further announced a change to Chapter 9, the DBE effort, which took effect in the office bulletin
No. 14-06 that took effect in September. In summary, Caltrans did not meet its DBE goals of twelve
and a half percent for the last fiscal year. FHWA asked Caltrans to initiate a pilot program. The
impact of the one year pilot program on Local Assistance is for all E-76's and all RFA submittals
issued after October 1. The RFA forms have been revised to include the DBE methodology or goal
for the individual projects. This will apply to all contracts for which the construction cost is more
than $2 million or consultant contracts of more than $500,000. If an agency is using good faith
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
November 17, 2014
Page 5
effort in their contact award process, Caltrans also requests the agency submit form 15-H, the DBE
good faith effort information, which will be sent to a subject matter specialist for evaluation, and
form 15-G. When form 9-D is submitted to Caltrans, it will be sent to a subject matter specialist to
be evaluated in accordance with FHWA's guidelines.
When form 9-D is submitted, Caltrans will provide a response within 15 business days. When form
15-G is submitted, Caltrans will provide a response within 10 business days, which will be part of the
RFA process.
12. OTHER BUSINESS
Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage, announced SB7 signed by the Governor impacts charter cities as
it relates to the public works contracts. Contractors who make public bids with charter cities must
be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). Prevailing wages also apply. If the
contractor is not registered with the DIR, the charter cities cannot award a contract. This may be
effective after the first of the year. The SB7 language must be included in the notice inviting bids.
Shirley Medina said she received a call from a consultant working on a pilot program funded by
Caltrans to ask if he could give a presentation on recycled asphalt to the TAC. Ms. Medina will talk
to him and determine if this will be on the January TAC agenda.
13. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee, the
meeting adjourned at approximately 11:22 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
r
- nirfey`Medin(a)
Planning and Programming Director
. 7
AGENDA ITEM 6
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 26, 2015
TO:
The Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager
SUBJECT:
Measure A Projections and Other Measure A Matters
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer, will make a brief presentation on the following
Measure A matters:
• Measure A FY 2014/15 Mid -Year Revenue Projections
• Measure A FY 2015/16 Revenue Projections
• Measure A allocation formulas
• Indirect Cost/Overhead Cost Eligibility
• Maintenance of Effort
The presentations are essential as we prepare for the FY 2015/16 — 2019/20 Measure A
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) reporting period.
The selection of the topics was based on recent inquiries by local agencies on Measure A
allocation formulas as well as issues noted through the recent Measure A audits for FY
2013/14.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 14, 2015
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer
THROUGH:
Anne Mayer, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Fiscal Year 2014/15 Mid -Year Revenue Projections
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve the mid -year FY 2014/15 revenue projections of $167 million for Measure A
revenues, $81.5 million for Local Transportation Fund (LTF) revenues, and $12 million
for Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) revenues;
2) Approve the budget increase adjustments to LTF transfers in of $276,400, and
expenditures and transfers out of $345,500 to reflect the revised LTF projections; and
3) Approve the budget increase adjustments to TUMF revenues of $4 million to reflect the
revised TUMF projections.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Prior to the beginning of FY 2014/15, staff made projections regarding the revenues to be
received from Measure A, LTF, and TUMF funds for budget purposes.
Staff tracks the Measure A, LTF, and TUMF revenues on a monthly basis. Current trends
indicate that Measure A and LTF receipts are about 5.7 percent and 7.8 percent higher,
respectively, for the six months ended December 31, 2014, compared to the same period last
year. The upward trend in receipts over the past six months reflects an improvement in sales
tax revenues compared to the actual receipts during the same period in FY 2013/14. However,
the trend for Measure A and LTF receipts through the five months ended November 30, 2014,
reflected increases of only 1.3 percent and 4.0 percent, respectively. The December 2014
receipt provided renewed but cautious optimism regarding that the local economic recovery
continues. For comparison purposes, the FY 2013/14 actual revenues reflected an increase of
4.6 percent and 6.5 percent in Measure A and LTF revenues, respectively, from the FY 2012/13
levels. FY 2014/15 TUMF receipts to date are significantly higher than FY 2013/14 trend;
however, monthly TUMF receipts tend to fluctuate significantly —making it difficult to ascertain
any trend. FY 2013/14 TUMF revenues were 6.6 percent lower than FY 2012/13 (highest level
since FY 2007/08).
Agenda Item 8
21
Recovery from the nationwide recession in the local economy continues. Sales tax revenues
have rebounded from the economic downturn's low point in 2010. The unemployment rate
has been decreasing and job growth indicators are somewhat encouraging. The housing
market is showing improvement with price appreciation and increases in building permits —
especially multi -family housing. Accordingly, staff took a conservative approach to this year's
mid -year projection analysis based on the revenue trend noted through December 2014. Staff
recommends the Commission maintain the current year revenue projections for Measure A and
LTF revenues and increase the TUMF revenue projection, as follows:
Revenue
Projections
Original
(January 2014)
FY 2014/15 Budget
Revised for Increase
Mid -Year (Decrease)
Adjustment from Budget
Measure A $ 167,000,000 $ 167,000,000 $ 167,000,000 $
LTF 81,500,000 81,500,000 81,500,000
TUMF 12,000,000 8,000,000 12,000,000 4,000,000
For reference purposes, audited revenues for FY 2013/14 were approximately $156,355,900
(Measure A), $77,544,200 (LTF), and $11,113,100 (TUMF). The Measure A and LTF revenue
projections for FY 2014/15 are 6.4 percent and 5.1 percent higher than the FY 2013/14 actual
revenues, respectively. The revised TUMF revenue projection reflects the average of the prior
two fiscal years' actual revenues with a 4.3 percent increase.
Any change in Measure A revenue projections has a direct effect on the distributions to the
geographic areas and related local streets and roads (LSR) programs. Since there is no change
in the Measure A revenue projections, no adjustments are required for LSR expenditures and
Coachella Valley highways and regional arterials.
Since there is no change in Measure A revenues, there is no change in the 1 percent statutory
limitation on administrative salaries and benefits. Based on a preliminary analysis through
December 31, 2014, it appears that this limitation will not be exceeded. Additionally, the
original Measure A administrative allocation of $2.9 million is sufficient to cover FY 2014/15
administrative costs. This allocation does not exceed the 4 percent limitation on administration
costs adopted by the Commission in a prior year.
The LTF audit was completed and financial statements were issued in November 2014. Staff
revised the original LTF projections to include the carryover that is available to the local
governments and transit agencies amounting to approximately $9,214,400. Staff recommends
the LTF administrative allocation remain unchanged at $850,000. Expenditure adjustments are
required for Commission and Southern California Association of Governments planning of
approximately $276,400 and $69,100, respectively. Since the Commission administrative and
planning allocations may be transferred to the General Fund, similar adjustments to transfers in
and out are also needed. The increase for SB 821 bicycle and pedestrian projects of
approximately $177,400 does not require a budget adjustment as this amount will be included
in the amount available for the next call for projects. The increase in the LTF balance available
Agenda Item 8
22
for apportionments for transit operators of approximately $7,822,400 also does not require a
budget adjustment as this amount will be available for any transit allocation adjustments based
on amendments to transit operator Short Range Transit Plans.
Upon Commission approval, staff will provide this updated information to the necessary local
governments and transit operators. Additionally, staff will continue to monitor FY 2014/15
revenues to determine if any adjustments to the revenue projections or Measure A
administration are necessary.
Financial Information
In Fiscal Year Budget:
No
Year:
FY 2014/15
Amount:
$4,276,400 sources
$345,500 uses
Source of Funds:
LTF and TUMF
Budget Adjustment:
Yes
$ 276,400
60162 97001
276,400
106 65 59001
69,100
60162 86205
GL/Project Accounting No.:
2,000,000 725000
416 41607 210 72 42110
2,000,000 735000
416 41607 210 73 42110
Fiscal Procedures Approved:
\i,,i,.40,4o
Date:
12/18/14
Attachments:
1) Measure A Program Allocation FY 2014/15
2) Riverside County LTF FY 2014/15 Apportionment
Agenda Item 8
23
ATTACHMENT 1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A PROGRAM ALLOCATION (PROJECTION)
FY 2014/15
(Revised (1/14/15)
Revenues $ 167,000,000 I
Less: Administration 2,900,000
APPORTIONMENT TO PROGRAMS $ 164,100,000
Western County
Highway Improvements $ 37,613,000
New Corridors 13,644,000
Public Transit
Commuter Rail 7,523,000
Intercity Bus 1,881,000
Specialized Transit -Operations 2,351,000
Specialized Transit-CTSA 783,000
Commuter Services 1,844,000
Regional Arterial 11,063,000
Local Streets & Roads 35,769,000
BANNING $ 530,000
BEAUMONT
CALIMESA 149,000
CANYON LAKE 169,000
CORONA 3,707,000
EASTVALE 1,088,000
HEMET 1,611,000
JURUPA VALLEY 1,802,000
LAKE ELSINORE 1,137,000
MENI FEE 1,438,000
MORENO VALLEY 3,586,000
MURRIETA 2,065,000
NORCO 599,000
PERRIS 1,353,000
RIVERSIDE 6,655,000
SAN JACINTO 718,000
TEMECULA 2,744,000
WILDOMAR 555,000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY 5,112,000
RCTC Regional Arterial 751,000
Bond Financing 9,956,000
Economic Development Projects 1,475,000
SUBTOTAL -Western County 123,902,000
Coachella Valley
Highways & Regional Arterials
Local Street & Roads
CATHEDRAL CITY
COACHELLA
DESERT HOT SPRINGS
INDIAN WELLS
INDIO
LA QUINTA
PALM DESERT
PALM SPRINGS
RANCHO MIRAGE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
CVAG
Specialized & Public Transit
SUBTOTAL -Coachella Valley
1,401,000
629,000
494,000
244,000
1,716,000
1,509,000
2,718,000
2,048,000
876,000
2,007,000
Palo Verde Valley
Local Street & Roads
BLYTHE $ 973,000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY 249,000
SUBTOTAL -Palo Verde Valley
19,488,000
13,642,000
5,846,000
38,976,000
1,222,000
1,222,000
TOTAL $ 164,100,000
I Mid -year revision reflects no change in revenue projection.
Note: Estimate for Planning Purposes, subject to change and rounding differences.
N:\MEASURES\Meas A FY15\2015 Measure A Revenue Projection Mid Year Revision.xlsx
24
ATTACHMENT 2
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND
FY 2014/15 APPORTIONMENT (Revised)
Estimated Carryover (Unapportioned)
Est. Receipts
TOTAL
Less: County Auditor -Controller Administration
Less: RCTC Administration
Less: RCTC Planning (3% of revenues)
Less: SCAG Planning (3/4 of 1 % of revenues)
BALANCE
Less: SB 821 (2% of balance)
BALANCE AVAILABLE BEFORE RESERVES
Less: 10% Transit Reserves
BALANCE AVAILABLE FOR APPORTIONMENT
APPORTIONMENT
Western:
Rail
Transit
Coachella Valley
Palo Verde Valley
22%
78%
Population
1,791,727
437,342
25,990
2,255,059
Population
% of Total
Revised
Projection
(01/14/15)
$ 9,214,419
81,500,000
90,714,419
12,000
850,000
2,721,433
680,358
86,450,628
1,729,013
84,721,616
8,472,162
$ 76,249,454
Revised
FY 2014/15
Apportionment
79.45% 60 582 985
13,328,257
47,254,728
19.39% 14,787,679
1.15% 878,790
100.00% $ 76,249,454
ALLOCATION OF TRANSIT RESERVES (in accordance with Reserve Policy adopted January 12, 2005):
Western:
Rail $ 1,480,917
Transit:
RTA $ 4,282,976
Banning 170,814
Beaumont 180,757
Corona 233,796
Riverside 382,182
Subtotal Transit $ 5,250,526 5,250,526
Subtotal Western 6,731,443
Coachella Valley 1,643,075
Palo Verde Valley 97,643
Total Reserves $ 8,472,162
NOTES: Estimate for Planning Purposes, subject to change and rounding differences
Population Source: California Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit as of January 1, 2013
Allocation of Reserves: FY 2012/13 SRTP Funding Allocations Approved 7/11/12
Original
Projection
(01/08/14)
81,500, 000
81,500,000
12,000
850,000
2,445,000
611,250
77,581,750
1,551,635
76,030,115
7,603,012
(Decrease)
Increase
$ 9,214,419
9,214,419
276,433
69,108
8,868,878
177,378
8,691, 501
869,150
$ 68,427,104 $ 7,822,350
Original
FY 2014/15 (Decrease)
Apportionment Increase
$ 54.367 841
11,960,925
42,406,916
13,270,627
788,636
$ 68,427,104 $ 7,822,350
$ 6,215,144
1,367,332
4,847,812
1,517,052
90,154
N:\LTF\2014-2015 Apportionments Mid Year Revision.xlsx 12/17/201412:49 PM
25
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 14, 2015
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Theresia Trevino, Chief Financial Officer
THROUGH:
Anne Mayer, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Fiscal Year 2015/16 Revenue Projections
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Approve the projections for Measure A revenues of $170 million for FY 2015/16;
2) Approve the projections of the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) apportionment of
$83 million for the Western Riverside County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley
areas for FY 2015/16; and
3) Approve the projections for Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) revenues of
$12 million for FY 2015/16.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Prior to the commencement of the annual budget process, the Chief Financial Officer presents
to the Commission the revenue projections for Measure A, LTF, and TUMF related to the next
fiscal year. These revenue projections include consideration of historical and current trends of
receipts and economic data collected from various sources. One source of data is the annual
sales tax forecast of Measure A and LTF revenues prepared by Beacon Economics, LLC, which is
attached.
Measure A
The Measure A projection consists of revenues generated from the local half -cent transactions
and use tax approved by the voters in November 2002. These Measure A funds are principally
used to fund highway, regional arterial, local streets and roads, new corridors, economic
development, bond financing, bus transit, commuter rail, commuter assistance, and specialized
transportation projects in the three geographic areas of Riverside County, as defined in the
Measure A Expenditure Plan. The percentage of Measure A revenues allocated to each of these
geographic areas is based on return to source of the sales tax revenues generated. FY 2015/16
represents the seventh year of the 30-year term of the 2009 Measure A.
The Measure A projection for FY 2015/16 is $170 million. The estimate is based on the revised
projection for FY 2014/15 and a 1.8 percent increase over the FY 2014/15 estimate. This
Agenda Item 9
26
increase is conservative and represents cautious optimism based on current economic forecast
information. This projection will become the basis for the preparation of the FY 2015/16
budget. The budget process typically commences in January of each year following the
development of the Measure A revenue projections. Additionally, the amounts for the local
streets and roads programs are usually provided to the local jurisdictions for planning purposes.
After the deduction for administration of $3 million, which is approximately 1.8 percent of
Measure A revenues, the amount available for distribution to the three geographic areas is
$167 million, which is allocated as follows:
Geographic Area Amount
Western Riverside County
Coachella Valley
Palo Verde Valley
Total
Local Transportation Fund
$ 126,514,000
39,322,000
1,164,000
$
167,000,000
The LTF projection consists of revenues generated from a quarter cent of the statewide sales
tax. These LTF funds are principally used to fund transit requirements within the county of
Riverside (County). The Transportation Development Act (TDA) legislation that created LTF
requires the County Auditor Controller to annually estimate the amount of revenues expected
to be generated from the sales tax. That estimate then becomes the basis for geographic
apportionment and for claimant allocation through the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) process,
which commences in January 2015 for the next fiscal year.
While the County is the taxing authority and maintains custodial responsibility over the LTF
revenues, the Commission by statute is charged with administration of the LTF funding process.
Therefore, the practice has been for staff to develop the revenue estimate and then submit it to
the County Auditor Controller for concurrence. Once the Commission and the County agree on
a revenue amount, staff prepares the statutorily required apportionment. Apportionment is
the process that assigns revenues to the three major geographic areas as defined by TDA law
within the County: Western Riverside County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley. The
revenues are divided based on the respective populations for each area. The apportionment
occurs after off -the -top allocations for administration to the County and Commission and set
asides for Southern California Association of Governments planning (3/4 of 1 percent), local
planning activities (3 percent), and bicycle and pedestrian projects (2 percent).
Attached is the FY 2015/16 LTF apportionment based on a revenue estimate of $83 million. The
estimate will be submitted to the County for its concurrence. The estimate is based on the
revised projection for FY 2014/15 and assumes a 1.8 percent increase over the FY 2014/15
estimate. This increase is conservative and represents cautious optimism based on current
economic forecast information. After the deductions for administration of $912,000 and
Agenda Item 9
27
set -asides of approximately $4,692,000, the amount available for apportionment before
reserves is approximately $77,396,000. The balance available for apportionment before
reserves is as follows:
Apportionment Area Amount
Western Riverside County $ 61,525,200
Coachella Valley 15,029,800
Palo Verde Valley 841,000
Total $ 77,396,000
In accordance with the Reserve Policy adopted by the Commission at its January 12, 2005
meeting, a reserve of 10 percent for each apportionment area will be established and set aside
for FY 2015/16, for unforeseen cost increases or other emergency. For the Western Riverside
County apportionment area, a portion of the reserve will be allocated to each of the transit
operators. For public bus transit operators, the allocation of the reserve is based on each
operator's proportionate share of FY 2013/14 LTF operating allocations. Operators may access
reserve funds by amending their SRTPs through the established amendment process.
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
The TUMF projection consists of revenues generated from fees charged to new development to
ensure it pays for the new transportation facilities needed to accommodate growth. As a result
of a memorandum of understanding executed in 2008 between the Commission and the
Western Riverside Council of Governments, the administrator of the TUMF program, the
Commission receives 48.7 percent of the TUMF revenues, after an administrative allocation for
the Commission's regional arterial program. The revenue estimate for FY 2015/16 is
$12 million. The estimate is based on the revised projection for FY 2014/15, and assumes no
change due to the slow but encouraging recovery in the housing market.
NEXT STEPS:
Upon Commission approval, staff will provide this information to the necessary local
jurisdictions and transit operators for planning purposes. Staff will continue to monitor
FY 2014/15 revenues during the development of the FY 2015/16 budget to determine if any
adjustments to the revenue projections are necessary.
Agenda Item 9
28
Financial Information
$83,000,000 LTF;
In Fiscal Year Budget:
N/A
Year:
FY 2015/16
Amount:
$170,000,000 Measure A;
$12,000,000 TUMF
Source of Funds:
LTF, Measure A, and TUMF
Budget Adjustment:
N/A
$ 83,000,000
60162
40102
3,000,000
001001
401 40101 101 1X 40101
38,406,000
623999
40140101 262 3140101
13,932,000
613999
40140101 261 31 40101
7,681,000
654199
40140101 265 33 40101
1,920,000
269 62 40101
2,400,000
260 26 40101
800,000
270 26 40101
1,883,000
632199
40140101 263 4140101
11,296,000
266 72 40101
GL/Project Accounting No.:
36,524,000
267 7140101
10,166,000
264 19 40101
1,506,000
683999
40140101 268 3140101
19,661,000
563999
40140101 256 3140101
13,763,000
257 7140101
5,898,000
258 26 40101
1,164,000
234 7140101
6,000,000
725000
416 41607 210 72 42110
6,000,000
735000
416 41607 210 73 42110
Fiscal Procedures Approved:
\i/,441
Date:
12/18/14
Attachments:
1) Measure A Program Allocation FY 2015/16
2) Riverside County LTF FY 2015/16 Apportionment
Agenda Item 9
29
Sales Tax Revenue Forecast
•
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, DECEMBER 2014
EASI
Riverside
BEACON ECONOMICS
This publication was prepared by:
Beacon Economics, LLC
Christopher Thornberg
Founding Partner
310.571.3399
Chris@BeaconEcon.com
And by:
Brian Vanderplas
Senior Research Associate
424.646.4654
Brian@BeaconEcon.com
BEACON ECONOMICS
Jordan G. Levine
Economist & Director of Economic Research
424.646.4652
Jordan@BeaconEcon.com
For further information about Beacon Economics, please contact:
Victoria Pike Bond
Director of Communications
415.457.6030
Victoria@BeaconEcon.com
Or visit our website at www.BeaconEcon.com.
Reproduction of this document or any portion therein is prohibited without the expressed written permission of Beacon
Economics. Copyright 02014 by Beacon Economics LLC.
Contents
Report Overview 1
National and State Economies 2
Taxable Sales and Sales Tax 3
Summary 6
BEACON ECONOMICS
Report Overview
Beacon Economics, LLC has undertaken a forecast of key revenue streams for the Riverside County Transportation
Commission (RCTC) over the next thirty years.
While our forecast uses standard time -series econometric techniques based on historical correlations and future
trends, our method of forecasting follows a layered approach. National policy changes and external shocks are built
into a U.S. model with a variety of indicators, including GDP, production, demographics, interest rates, government
spending, taxes, savings, income growth, and real estate. A California model is then developed that incorporates macro
trends at the national level with trends in the local labor market, including demographics, real estate, and business
activity indicators.
Taking into account these state and national factors, Beacon Economics has set up a regional model for Riverside
County that uses the macro trends along with a variety of specific regional data - including figures on sales tax rev-
enues that were provided by RCTC - to create a local forecast that provides a broad outlook for the region on em-
ployment by industry, the unemployment rate, consumer spending and income trends, population and components
of change, residential real estate and construction, and nonresidential real estate and construction. Thus, in our re-
gional assessment, we highlight the major drivers on the national level, continue with developments in the State of
California, and zoom in on Riverside County's economy to provide a forecast of the activity and revenues that can be
expected by RCTC out to fiscal year 2042-43.
Riverside County Transportation Commission Revenue Forecast
Actual
Forecast
Revenue Stream
FY 2014
FY 2015
FY 2016
FY 2017
FY 2018
FY 2019
FY 2020
Nominal
Taxable Sales ($ 000s)
31,147,000,000
33,177,109,375
35,192,842,773
37,967,138,672
41,240,745,117
44,559,730,469
48,172,680,664
Growth(%)
6.1
6.5
6.1
7.9
8.6
8.0
8.1
Measure A Tax
155,255,392
165,885,547
175,964,214
189,835,693
206,203,726
222,798,652
240,863,403
Growth(%)
5.6
6.8
6.1
7.9
8.6
8.0
8.1
LTF Tax
76,375,798
82,942,773
87,982,107
94,917,847
103,101,863
111,399,326
120,431,702
Growth(%)
5.8
8.6
6.1
7.9
8.6
8.0
8.1
Real
Taxable Sales ($ 000s)
23,378,851,470
24,506,525,998
25,556,310,786
27,093,086,255
28,850,134,115
30,577,694,708
32,431,384,229
Growth(%)
4.8
4.8
4.3
6.0
6.5
6.0
6.1
Measure ATax
116,894,257
122,037,628
127,781,554
135,465,430
144,250,672
152,888,472
162,156,924
Growth(%)
4.8
4.4
4.7
6.0
6.5
6.0
6.1
LTF Tax
58,447,129
61,001,302
63,890,777
67,732,715
72,125,336
76,444,236
81,078,462
Growth(%)
4.8
4.4
4.7
6.0
6.5
6.0
6.1
Source: Forecast by Beacon Economics
RCTC Revenue Forecast
1
December 2014
BEACON ECONOMICS
National and State Economies
In our most recent quarterly edition of Beaconomics, which can be accessed for free at www.BeaconEcon.com, we
provide an in-depth analysis of the current national and state trends. Below is a brief summary of what we see hap-
pening for the U.S. and California economies. The remainder of this report will explain the underlying drivers behind
our forecast conclusions.
United States Economy
■ During the third quarter of 2014, the U.S. economy grew at a 3.5% annual rate, down from the previous quarter's
4.6% growth, but still a solid increase — and higher than the post -recession average growth of 2.3%.
■ The global economy has exhibited weak growth as of late, with Europe having yet to pull out of its recession.
China's growth has slowed and its real estate markets have showed signs of distress. But unlike the previous global
downturn, the U.S. is no longer at the core of the problem and, rather, is a source of strength in the international
economy.
■ Nearly every part of the U.S. economy is showing real signs of slow but steady improvement, from housing to pub-
lic spending to credit. The only portion of the economy that is acting as a drain on the nation is the export sector,
however, that is due to weakness in the global economy.
■ Beacon Economics is forecasting that the U.S. economy will keep growing this year, but at slightly below 3%, a bit
slower than last year. Next year, expect the U.S. economy to grow at a pace modestly over 3%, with the following
year improving even more.
is As for major potential risks, they remain largely external — although, there is nothing currently on the international
front that could seriously derail the nation's economy. Still, the global economy remains the swing item. Absent
such improbable occurrences, though, the U.S. economy will continue to expand for the foreseeable future.
California Economy
■ As the Great Recession fades from California's rear-view mirror, it is becoming increasingly imperative to focus
on the structural challenges that the state faces over the long run.
■ Among the obstacles the state faces are improving educational attainment, funding the state's pension obliga-
tions, infrastructure investments, reducing the cost of housing, and reforming our tax system to mitigate the
effects of future economic downturns.
■ As of September 2014, nonfarm employment in the Golden State jumped ahead of its pre -recession peak by
more than 80,000 positions. While some sectors have performed better than others, every major industry in the
state's economy has shown progress since hitting bottom in 2010.
■ Jobs are being created across the spectrum of wage categories. California has enjoyed solid job growth in low -
wage categories like Leisure and Hospitality, Administrative Support, and Retail Trade. However, the state's labor
market has also created a sizeable number of new Healthcare, Professional, and Information jobs —which tend
toward the higher end of the wage spectrum.
RCTC Revenue Forecast 2 December 2014
BEACON ECONOMICS
■ Many leading indicators for future job growth remain in positive territory as well. Business and consumer spend-
ing, as measured by taxable sales, are up by more than 4.5%through the first half of 2014. Business investment
continues to move forward in California with more than $5.4 billion in new venture capital deployed so far this
year.
■ Beacon Economics is currently forecasting that the California economy will continue to lead the national recov-
ery, with growth picking up in 2015 and 2016 before settling into more "normal" growth rates thereafter.
Taxable Sales and Sales Tax
Beacon Economics' taxable sales forecast for Riverside County is based on the underlying fundamentals behind
consumer and business spending in the area — namely, population and income trends in both the larger regional
economy and in the County of Riverside itself. Based on the trends in the national, state, and local economies, our
forecast projects taxable sales growth in the 6% to 8% range over the next five fiscal years. Thereafter, we expect
taxable sales to return to trend growth of between 5%to 6% per year out to fiscal year 2042-43. We expect inflation
to remain in line with historical trends and are currently projecting real growth in the 5%to 6% range over the next
five fiscal years, and then cooling down to 3% to 4% for the remainder of the forecast.
Taxable Sales Forecast
Riverside County, FY 1972-73 to 2042-43
2.0e+08 -
N
O
'- 1.5e+08-
m
Gs
m 1.0e+08-
cn I:
_O
50000000- i � "1 1 `i
I
0
1973 1983 1993 2003 2013 2023 2033
Actual r.ri''j Forecast
Source: Forecast by Beacon Economics
i
is
.,
2043
Taxable Sales Growth Forecast
Riverside County, FY 1972-73 to 2042-43
N 0-
m
V)
d
-10-
-20 -
1973 1983 1993 2003 2013 2023 2033 2043
- Actual =1 Forecast
Source: Forecast by Beacon Economics
Population in the County Continues to Expand
■ Riverside County's population grew by 1.1% from 2013 to 2014, a marginally faster rate of increase compared
to the statewide population growth of 0.9% over the same period. Having more residents live in the County will
ultimately boost spending in the region, in turn supporting revenue growth over the next five fiscal years.
■ The population growth from 2013 to 2014 was a slight acceleration over the 1.0% growth rate seen from 2012
to 2013, but was under the 2.9% average annual growth rate over the last ten years.
■ The County of Riverside's population has, on average, grown faster than that of the State overall over the decades
and we expect these trends to continue.
RCTC Revenue Forecast 3 December 2014
BEACON ECONOMICS
Inland Empire Labor Market
Oct-09 to Oct-14
1,260-
� 1,240-
N
8 1,220 -
o
ai 1,200-
T
a1,18o-
E
w 1,160-
1,140- -8
Oct-09 Oct-10 Oct-11 Oct-12 Oct-13 Oct-14
I1M Nonfarm Employment Unemployment Rate
Source: California Employment Development Department
Riverside County Population
1990 to 2014
2,400 -
0 2,000-
O
c 1,800- j-
_o
1,600- _
'°- _
c°- 1,400-
1,200- ��-
1,000
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Source: California Department of Finance
Inland Empire Labor Markets Gain Traction
■ Total nonfarm employment in the Inland Empire increased by 2.2%from October 2013 to October 2014, slightly
faster than the 2.1% annual increase in statewide nonfarm payrolls and ahead of the nation overall. The unem-
ployment rate in the Inland Empire has fallen 1.8 percentage points over the last year to 8.0%, which is somewhat
higher than the current statewide average of 7.3%. These improvements in the local labor market will help sup-
port income growth and spending power in the years to come.
■ As of October 2014, the Inland Empire had recouped 126,400 of the 149,200 jobs lost from the peak in July
of 2007 to the trough in February of 2010. Although nonfarm employment is currently at 1.8% below its pre -
recession peak, the region has clearly come a long way since the Great Recession.
■ Job growth was spread across a broad range of sectors, with only the Construction and Financial Activities sec-
tors experiencing declines over the last year. Leading the way was the Professional and Business Services sector,
which increased payrolls by more than 7,200 over the last year.
Inland Empire Employment Growth
Industry
Oct-13 Oct-14 Change Growth (%)
Total Nonfarm 1,239,400 1,267,200 27,800 2.2
Professional/Business 134,036 141,275 7,239 5.4
Education/Health 184,682 190,558 5,876 3.2
Retail Trade 165,719 170,643 4,925 3.0
Government 225,253 229,138 3,886 1.7
Transport,Warehouse,Util. 79,736 83,572 3,836 4.8
Leisure and Hospitality 139,023 142,107 3,084 2.2
Wholesale Trade 56,310 58,728 2,418 4.3
Manufacturing 87,110 88,581 1,471 1.7
Information 11,294 11,777 484 4.3
NR/Mining 1,199 1,197 -1 -0.1
Financial Activities 42,741 41,506 -1,235 -2.9
Construction 71,227 69,791 -1,436 -2.0
Other Services 41,071 38,325 -2,747 -6.7
Source: California Employment Development Department
RCTC Revenue Forecast
4
December 2014
BEACON ECONOMICS
Riverside County Spending Maintaining Momentum
■ With improving labor market conditions and a gradually improving local economy, spending within the County
has already bounced back nicely from the recession.
■ According to information from the State Board of Equalization, taxable sales in the County of Riverside as of
the second quarter of 2014 were already 5.8% above the pre -recession peak set in the second quarter of 2006.
More over, in the first half of 2014, taxable sales in Riverside County have continued to move forward, having
increased by 5.8% compared to the first half of 2013 spending levels.
■ As of the second quarter of 2014, the region has seen gains across virtually every category of spending from
autos to restaurants to hotels. Only the business and Industry category saw year -over -year declines.
Riverside County Sales Tax Receipts by Category
Category Q2-13 Q2-14 Growth (%)
Total 75,594,602 80,780,497 6.9
Autos and Transportation 11,839,343 13,168,096 11.2
Building and Construction 7,403,024 8,082,901 9.2
Food and Drugs 4,238,344 4,543,829 7.2
Fuel and Service Stations 9,791,480 10,355,426 5.8
General Consumer Goods 16,908,268 17,851,191 5.6
Restaurants and Hotels 8,188,280 8,642,189 5.5
Business and Industry 10,042,565 9,975,536 -0.7
Source: HdL Companies
Inflation Remains Tame
■ The personal consumption expenditure deflator, the Federal Reserve's primary indicator for inflation, rose by
just 1.5% from the third quarter of 2013 to the third quarter of 2014.
■ Even though monetary policy remains accommodative in the short term, the risk of inflation remains low given
the current slack in the national labor market. Our long term outlook assumes that inflation will be in the 1.5%
to 2.0% range in the latter years of our forecast.
RCTC Revenue Forecast 5 December 2014
BEACON ECONOMICS
Surnnrmiry
Overall, the economy in Riverside County and throughout the Inland Empire continues to improve as the region's
labor market maintains upward momentum, the population continues to grow, spending levels have bounced back
from recession lows, and inflation is expected to remain low. Each of these factors should help to bolster taxable
sales and subsequent RCTC revenues in the coming years as outlined in this report. With the worst definitely behind
us, Riverside County has come a long way since the Great Recession and the local economy is poised for positive
growth in the years to come.
Riverside County Transportation Commission Revenue Forecast
Revenue Stream
Actual
Forecast
FY 2014
FY 2015
FY 2016
FY 2017
FY 2018
FY 2019 FY 2020
Nominal
Taxable Sales ($ 000s) 31,147,000,000 33,177,109,375 35,192,842,773 37,967,138,672 41,240,745,117 44,559,730,469 48,172,680,664
Growth(%) 6.1 6.5 6.1 7.9 8.6 8.0 8.1
Measure ATax 155,255,392 165,885,547 175,964,214 189,835,693 206,203,726 222,798,652 240,863,403
Growth(%) 5.6 6.8 6.1 7.9 8.6 8.0 8.1
LTF Tax 76,375,798 82,942,773 87,982,107 94,917,847 103,101,863 111,399,326 120,431,702
Growth(%) 5.8 8.6 6.1 7.9 8.6 8.0 8.1
Real
Taxable Sales ($ 000s) 23,378,851,470 24,506,525,998 25,556,310,786 27,093,086,255 28,850,134,115 30,577,694,708 32,431,384,22
Growth(%) 4.8 4.8 4.3 6.0 6.5 6.0 6.
Measure ATax 116,894,257 122,037,628 127,781,554 135,465,430 144,250,672 152,888,472 162,156,92
Growth(%) 4.8 4.4 4.7 6.0 6.5 6.0 6.
LTF Tax 58,447,129 61,001,302 63,890,777 67,732,715 72,125,336 76,444,236 81,078,46
Growth(%) 4.8 4.4 4.7 6.0 6.5 6.0 6.
Source: Forecast by Beacon Economics
RCTC Revenue Forecast 6 December 2014
BEACON ECONOMICS
About Beacon Economics
About Beacon Economics
Beacon Economics, LLC is a leading provider of economic research, forecasting, industry analysis, and data services.
By delivering independent, rigorous analysis we give our clients the knowledge they need to make the right strategic
decisions about investment, growth, revenue, and policy. Learn more at www.BeaconEcon.com.
Services
■ Economic, Revenue, & Occupational
Forecasting
■ Economic Impact Analysis
■ Regional Economic Analysis
■ Economic Policy Analysis
■ Real Estate Market Analysis
■ Industry and Market Analysis
■ EB-5 Economic Analysis
■ Public Speaking
■ Expert Testimony
Contacts
■ Sherif Hanna
Managing Partner
(424) 646-4656
Sherif@BeaconEcon.com
■ Victoria Pike Bond
Director of Communications
(415) 457-6030
Victoria@BeaconEcon.com
■ Rick Smith
Director of Business Development
(858) 997-1834
Rick@BeaconEcon.com
RCTC Revenue Forecast 7 December 2014
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
MEASURE A PROGRAM ALLOCATION (PROJECTION)
FY 2015/16
Revenues i 170,000,000
Less: Administration 3,000,000
APPORTIONMENT TO PROGRAMS e 167,000,000
Western County
Highway Improvements $ 38,406,000
New Corridors 13,932,000
Public Transit
Commuter Rail 7,681,000
Intercity Bus 1,920,000
Specialized Transit -Operations 2,400,000
Specialized Transit-CTSA 800,000
Commuter Services 1,883,000
Regional Arterial 11,296,000
Local Streets & Roads 36,524,000
BANNING $ 535,000
BEAUMONT
CALIMESA 152,000
CANYON LAKE 172,000
CORONA 3,776,000
EASTVALE 1,141,000
HEMET 1,634,000
JURUPA VALLEY 1,830,000
LAKE ELSINORE 1,159,000
MENIFEE 1,476,000
MORENO VALLEY 3,611,000
MURRI ETA 2,114,000
NORCO 607,000
PERRIS 1,416,000
RIVERSIDE 6,797,000
SAN JACINTO 782,000
TEMECULA 2,747,000
WILDOMAR 565,000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY 5,238,000
RCTC Regional Arterial 772,000
Bond Financing 10,166,000
Economic Development Projects 1,506,000
SUBTOTAL -Western County 126,514,000
Coachella Valley
Highways & Regional Arterials
Local Street & Roads
CATHEDRAL CITY
COACHELLA
DESERT HOT SPRINGS
INDIAN WELLS
INDIO
LA QUINTA
PALM DESERT
PALM SPRINGS
RANCHO MIRAGE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Specialized & Public Transit
SUBTOTAL -Coachella Valley
1,427,000
627,000
498,000
253,000
1,796,000
1,499,000
2,686,000
2,035,000
871,000
2,071,000
Palo Verde Valley
Local Street & Roads
BLYTHE $ 928,000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY 236,000
SUBTOTAL -Palo Verde Valley
TOTAL
19, 661, 000
13,763,000
5,898,000
39,322,000
1,164,000
1,164,000
$ 167,000,000
Note: Estimate for Planning Purposes, subject to change and rounding differences.
ATTACHMENT 2
N:\MEASURES\Meas A FY16\2016 Measure A Revenue Projection.xlsx
40
ATTACHMENT 3
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND
FY 2015/16 APPORTIONMENT (Original)
Estimated Carryover (Unapportioned)
Est. Receipts
TOTAL
Less: County Auditor -Controller Administration
Less: RCTC Administration
Less: RCTC Planning (3% of revenues)
Less: SCAG Planning (3/4 of 1 % of revenues)
BALANCE
Less: SB 821 (2% of balance)
BALANCE AVAILABLE BEFORE RESERVES
Less: 10% Transit Reserves
BALANCE AVAILABLE FOR APPORTIONMENT
APPORTIONMENT
Western:
Rail
Transit
Coachella Valley
Palo Verde Valley
22%
78%
83,000,000
83,000,000
12,000
900,000
2,490,000
622,500
78,975,500
1,579,510
77,395,990
7,739,599
$ 69,656,391
Population FY 2015/16
Population % of Total Apportionment
1,812,438
442,756
24,773
79.49% $ 55,372,686
12,181,991
43,190,695
19.42% 13,526,850
1.09% 756,855
2,279,967 100.00% $ 69,656,391
ALLOCATION OF TRANSIT RESERVES (in accordance with Reserve Policy adopted January 12, 2005):
Western:
Rail
Transit:
RTA $ 3,950,010
Banning 132,713
Beaumont 205,502
Corona 195,981
Riverside 314,761
Subtotal Transit $ 4,798,966 4,798,966
Subtotal Western
Coachella Valley
Palo Verde Valley
Total Reserves
$ 1,353,555
6,152,521
1,502,983
84,095
7,739, 599
NOTES: Estimate for Planning Purposes, subject to change and rounding differences
Population Source: California Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit as of January 1, 2014
Allocation of Reserves: FY 2013/14 SRTP Funding Allocations Approved 7/10/13
NALTF\2015-2016 Apportionments.xlsx 12/17/20144:51 PM
41
AGENDA ITEM 7
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 14, 2015
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Aaron Hake, Government Relations Manager
THROUGH:
Anne Mayer, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
2015 Legislative Platform and Preview
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Commission to:
1) Adopt the Commission's 2015 State and Federal Legislative Platform; and
2) Receive and file a report on state and federal legislation for 2015.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
2015 Legislative Platform
At the beginning of every year, the Commission adopts a legislative platform that outlines the
positions the Commission will take on various pieces of legislation, administrative policies, and
regulations. The platform addresses broad themes that are critical in both Washington, D.C.
and Sacramento. These platform points allow staff, Commissioners, and Commission lobbyists
to communicate in a timely, effective manner with state and federal actors as issues arise.
This year's proposed legislative platform follows closely with what the Commission adopted in
previous years and includes several items have been added or adjusted to reflect policy issues
that have arisen in the last year and anticipated to be on the horizon for 2015. The proposed
2015 legislative platform is attached.
2015 State and Federal Legislative Preview
The New Year will feature new faces, however there are familiar issues for the transportation
industry. The 2014 midterm elections brought a large freshman class of legislators to
Sacramento and Washington, D.C. as well as new policy committee chairs, and shifting balances
of political power. Yet, both capitols still face a sensitive but increasingly urgent political
challenge of addressing long-term funding for transportation infrastructure. Revenues for
transportation continue to decline overall. Uncertainty continues to hover over both the state
and federal transportation programs as maintenance backlogs continue to pile up, mandates
for emissions reductions draw nearer, and economic recovery generates more freight traffic on
highways and rails.
Agenda Item 7B
6
The Commission's advocacy team is preparing for 2015, which could shape up to be a defining
year in terms of knowing what the long-term future could be for transportation in California
and the nation. The Commission's legislative advocacy program is coordinated by the
Government Relations Manager with the support and guidance of the Executive Director and
Deputy Executive Director. The Commission contracts with legislative advocates in Sacramento
and Washington, D.C. to represent the Commission in policy and funding discussions. This is a
common practice by nearly every transportation commission in California. The Commission's
legislative advocates are policy experts who work closely with committee staff and Members,
as well as with the Riverside County legislative delegation, trade associations, and stakeholder
groups, to help the Commission's interests be reflected in state and federal policy as much as
possible. This representation served the Commission well over the years, resulting in successes
such as:
• Passage of several state bills sponsored by the Commission;
• Language in multiple federal bills addressing Commission priorities;
• Securing a TIFIA loan for State Route 91, a $75 million grant for Perris Valley Line;
• Special appropriations for Commission -sponsored projects; and
• High-level meetings with administration and legislative officials.
In preparation for the year ahead, the Commission's advocates have prepared the following
brief reports on what to expect in Washington and Sacramento:
Federal Legislative Preview
By Commission Legislative Advocates Kathy Ruffalo and Cliff Madison
Likely Transportation Topics in Washington D.C.
There are two major pieces of transportation legislation that Congress will need to address in
some manner in 2015 — expiration of Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21sY Century Act
(MAP-21) and expiration of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reauthorization. The
ability to extend MAP-21 programs — either again in the short-term or with passage of a multi-
year bill — will depend largely upon finding the resources necessary to bolster the Highway Trust
Fund (HTF), which is projected to have a negative balance sometime in May. Leaders of both
the House and Senate transportation committees have publicly stated they want a five or six
year authorization bill — however the ability to successfully achieve that outcome will require a
stable funding source, which includes an increase in the fuel taxes.
There are a multitude of ideas on how to pay for surface transportation programs — but no
consensus around any of them. There will be two key legislative opportunities in the spring
that could present themselves as vehicles for addressing transportation revenue: a budget
resolution/reconciliation process and the upcoming need to address the federal debt ceiling.
Agenda Item 7B
7
In addition, should Congress actually attempt to address comprehensive tax reform — either
corporate, personal or both — that becomes another potential method to address
transportation funding needs.
In addition, there continues to be interest in moving legislation to address passenger rail and
rail safety issues.
What Are The Big Picture Politics That Will Shape The Legislative Year?
With Republicans in control of both the House and Senate, it is possible that more legislation
can pass Congress and be sent to the President (with the caveat that 60 votes are still needed in
the Senate to pass legislation). It is also possible the Commission could see more vetoes of such
legislation by the President. Transportation issues remain one of the few areas of bipartisan
consensus; that is not expected to change. However, the larger politics surrounding events in
Washington D.C. — immigration, nominations, climate change, etc — could impact the ability to
move forward with any transportation bill. During a Presidential election cycle, the first year is
the "best" time to advance legislation — i.e., 2015. Once the Presidential election gets closer,
the more difficult it can become.
Who Are The Key Players in Transportation Legislation in 2015?
More than ever, legislation is crafted with the input of Congressional leadership — both in the
House and Senate and within the Republican and Democrat caucuses. Therefore, in addition to
the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the House and Senate transportation and tax
committees, leadership members will be critical to any successful effort to advance
transportation legislation. Key Members include:
• House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) — Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
• House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) —Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV)
• House Ways and Means Committee — Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI), Ranking Member
Sander Levin
• House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee — Chairman Bill Shuster (R-PA),
Ranking Member Peter DeFazio (D-OR)
• Senate Environment and Public Works Committee — Chairman Jim Inhofe (R-OK),
Ranking Member Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
• Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee — Chairman Richard Shelby
(R-AL), Ranking Member Sherrod Brown (D-OH)
• Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee — Chairman John Thune
(R-SD), Ranking Member Bill Nelson (D-FL)
• Senate Finance Committee — Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Ranking Member Ron Wyden
(D-OR)
Agenda Item 7B
8
How Will The Obama Administration Engage Transportation This Year?
Transportation and overall infrastructure issues continue to be discussed by the President. The
Administration released its surface transportation bill in 2014, and it is not expected that there
will be a new version of the legislation in 2015. The Administration's legislation proposed to
pay for transportation programs through revenue generated in any corporate tax reform. With
the change in control of the Senate and the larger number of Republican House Members — if
the Administration wants to play a role in the legislative process, the Administration will need
to be flexible on its requests and work closely with the committees. Failure to do that will leave
the Administration on the sidelines. It is unclear how or if the Administration will choose to
engage with the 114th Congress.
State Legislative Preview
By Commission Legislative Advocate Mark Watts
The present Fiscal Year 2014/15 witnessed the establishment of emerging and important new
programs in the form of the Active Transportation Program (ATP) and the Cap and Trade (CAT)
auction revenue allocations for the budget year and for the longer term. Moreover, through
the leadership of the Administration, the state's core transportation revenues also were
supplemented with much needed one-time resources through the early restoration of
$337 million in loan repayments from the General Fund (GF) to the Highway Users Tax Account
(HUTA). Within this backdrop, it is timely to look ahead at 2015.
Transportation Policy Shapers for 2015
Legislature
The legislative leadership through 2014 included Assembly Transportation Chair,
Bonnie Lowenthal, who has retired under term limits, and the Senate Transportation
Committee Chair, Mark DeSaulnier, who was recently elected to Congress. Also, playing the
role as strong advocates for transportation programs have been the two Budget Subcommittee
Chairs, Senator Jim Beall and Assembly Member Richard Bloom.
While the Speaker of the Assembly initially appointed new committee chairs in early December,
the Senate Pro Tem released the Rules Committee selection of chairs this week.
In the Assembly, Richard Bloom will continue to be active as the Budget Subcommittee #2
(Transportation & Resources) Chair and will provide oversight of the state's transportation
budgets, as well as CAT revenues. The new Assembly Transportation Committee Chair will be
Assembly Member Jim Frazier. Mr. Frazier brings a strong familiarity with transportation
programs as he previously spent a number of years on the Contra Costa Transportation
Authority (CCTA), a Self -Help County such as Riverside. He also has a strong interest in highway
safety and will be a leader in the coming year in seeking solutions to the state's transportation
funding challenge.
Agenda Item 7B
9
The Senate Pro Tem announced the new Senate Transportation & Housing Chair will be Senator
Jim Beall. Senator Beall brings a long history and familiarity with transportation programs; he
served on the Santa Clara VTA board and was a designee to the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission (MTC). Most recently, he served as the Senate Budget #2 (Transportation &
Resources) Chair in 2013 and 2014. Replacing Senator Beall on the Budget Subcommittee #2
will be Senator Lois Wolk from the Yolo County region. Her history of service in the Assembly
and Senate has seen a focus on water policy, related agricultural and resource issues, and more
recently local government finance.
Brown Administration
In the Administration, California State Transportation Agency (CaISTA) Secretary Brian Kelly
continues to drive state transportation policy. In the past year, the Secretary's office was
extremely instrumental in bringing the ATP to a conclusion in the budget process, lead the
California Transportation Infrastructure Priorities (CTIP) Work Group in defining the challenges
confronting the state transportation program, was deeply involved in framing the CAT auction
revenue allocation process and was instrumental in pursuit of the recently activated Road User
Charge (RUC) pilot program established to examine the challenges and opportunities that may
come from a new approach to transportation finance.
In a more recent development, Will Kempton's appointment to the California Transportation
Commission as Executive Director marks the willingness and commitment of the Commissioners
to take on and aid in addressing the states' transportation funding challenge. Mr. Kempton
spent the past two years as the leader of a statewide transportation industry and labor
coalition that has the goal of seeking adequate funding for the state and local systems.
Major Statewide Issues
State Budget
Most likely, the most pressing new development that will frame the political environment will
be the pressure to develop or expand state programs in the wake of several consecutive years
of budget deficits.
While the improving economic outlook for the state brings brightened prospects for the state
budget, this perspective must be tempered with the reality of recent changes and
improvements to the state budget process adopted by voters in November 2014 that will result
in fewer state GF resources available to allocate to new or expanded programs. The Legislative
Analyst's recent update of the annual budget outlook estimates for the present year, the state
budget reserve will see an additional $4 billion; however, Proposition 2, approved in November,
mandates $2 billion of this is to be deposited in the new "rainy day" fund and another $2 billion
is to be dedicated to paying down state debt. As a consequence, there will be little in the way
of new revenue resources available for program growth in FY 2015/16 outside of K-12 funding
under Proposition 98.
Agenda Item 7B
10
Emerging Transportation Issues
The state's roadway infrastructure continues to see a widening gap between well -documented
and growing maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction needs at local and state levels and
stagnating or diminishing transportation revenues. Exacerbating this is the annual Fuel Tax
Swap revenue neutral tax rate adjustment mandate that compels the State Board of
Equalization to adjust the tax rate to reflect changes in the volume and price of motor fuels.
Cap and Trade
Even as state agencies near the release of guidelines that govern the allocation of CAT revenues
for the year, one potentially contentious policy issue that emerged is represented by three bills
introduced on the initial day of the FY 2015/16 legislative session. These measures would
either delay or outright eliminate the extension of the CAT regulations to the fuel distribution
network (a proxy for motorists). The CARB CAT trade regulation scheme is scheduled to impact
the fuels network beginning on January 1, 2015; it is projected the pass -through cost to
motorists could range from 9 cents to 50 cents, per gallon, at the gas pump. The funds thus
raised have been dedicated statutorily to the CAT allocation process, with little of these
revenues coming back to address much needed roadway and highway repairs. Similar bills
were introduced in 2014, however failed, never having received a hearing.
High -Speed Rail
Proposition 1A, a nearly $10 billion bond to fund the start of the state high-speed rail system,
was approved by voters in 2008. Opposition at regional levels has since emerged and
legislation has recently been introduced to bring an end to the development of the system.
One version of this legislation would simply restrict any additional expenditure of these funds
and apply the remaining bond proceeds to pay off the associated bond debt service. Another
version goes further and would in addition, direct unsold bonds to be available to be spent on
K-12 facilities. Similar legislation was introduced in 2014, but was unsuccessful.
Fuel Tax Swap
As highlighted above, the Fuel Tax Swap, enacted in 2011, eliminated the sales tax on fuel and
replaced the revenues with a like amount of the excise tax; the bill required the State Board of
Equalization to do an annual "true -up" in the tax rate to match the amount that Proposition 42
(sales tax on fuel) would raise. Last year, the continued, multi -year erosion of fuel sales
resulted in a reduction in the Tax Swap tax gas tax rate of 3 cents per gallon and with the
current fuel price environment, the Commission may be faced with a similar impact in the
upcoming Board action. This would drive resources for the state preservation program further
into deficit.
Attachment: Draft 2015 State and Federal Legislative Platform
Agenda Item 7B
11
2015 State and Federal Legislative Platform
Riverside County Transportation Commission
OBJECTIVE: Advocate for state and federal policy decisions that enable RCTC to implement Measure A,
the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), its adopted plans and programs, comply with state and federal
requirements, and provide for greater mobility, quality of life, and economic vitality in Riverside County.
Equity and Fairness
• Funding should be distributed equitably to Riverside County.
• Governance structures should give equitable voting and decision -making authority to Riverside
County.
Regional Control
• Project selection and planning authority for state/federal funds should be as local as possible,
preferably in the hands of the Commission.
• State/federal rulemakings, administrative processes, and policy development activities should
include meaningful collaboration from regional transportation agencies.
• Oppose efforts by non -transportation interests to assert control over transportation funding.
• Policies should be sensitive to each region's unique needs and avoid "one size fits all"
assumptions, especially regarding the balance among highways, transit, rail, and freight; and
urban, suburban, and rural needs.
• State/federal policies should align authority to select projects, manage performance, and
implement programs with state/federal mandates and responsibilities placed upon regional and
local governments.
Protect Our Authority and Revenue
• Existing statutory authorities for the Commission should be preserved and protected.
• Oppose efforts to infringe on the Commission's discretion in collecting and administering its
revenue sources including, but not limited to, Measure A, tolls, TUMF.
Innovation
• Support the availability of project delivery tools such as design -build, construction
manager/general contractor, and public -private partnerships by the Commission, the State,
federal agencies, and other infrastructure agencies. Oppose efforts to add barriers to effective
implementation of such tools.
• Support a collaborative approach for the California Transportation Secretary's "California
Transportation Infrastructure Priorities (CTIP)" efforts to advance innovation and reform.
• Support implementation and expansion of U.S. Department of Transportation's "Every Day
Counts" initiative, the "Building America Transportation Investment Center" and other efforts to
expedite advance innovation in transportation.
12
Project Delivery Streamlining
• Support all efforts to reduce project delivery timelines while maintaining important
environmental protections.
• Support reciprocity of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the National
Environmental Protection Act (NEPA).
• Support implementation of MAP-21 reforms that create timelines and penalties for delayed
reviews by federal agencies. Support further strengthening of timelines, penalties, and
requirements for concurrent reviews. Support Council on Environmental Quality pilot programs
for monitoring major projects.
• Support creation of a low interest loan program to support habitat conservation plans that
mitigate the impacts of transportation infrastructure and make project approvals more efficient.
• Support efforts to modernize the CEQA, including but not limited to:
o Reduce the Commission's exposure to litigation
o Increase accountability and disclosure for plaintiffs in CEQA cases
o Limit courts' ability to invalidate entire CEQA document when a writ of mandate can
resolve discreet issues
o Exempt illegal actions from CEQA review
o Prohibit "document dumping"
Accountability
• Revenue derived from transportation sources should be spent exclusively on transportation
projects. Support measures to strengthen the relationship between transportation revenue and
expenditures; oppose measures that weaken them.
• Support efforts to ensure that all projects in a voter -approved tax measure are delivered to the
public.
• Support efforts to prioritize state cap -and -trade revenues for greenhouse -gas -reducing
transportation projects.
• Encourage the adoption of on time, balanced state budgets, federal appropriations, and
authorizations, to ensure transportation projects are delivered without delay or costly
stoppages, and that adequate planning for future projects can take place.
• Promote policies that ensure state and federal agencies are responsive and accountable to
Commission concerns when working on Commission projects.
• Oppose efforts by non -elected, regulatory bodies to dilute, reduce, or withhold transportation
funds.
• Support maximum transparency by funding agencies in revealing scoring of funding requests.
Alignment of Responsibilities
• Support policies that reflect and recognize self-help counties' supermajority funding
contribution to transportation projects in California. Oppose policies that give outsized weight
to minority funding partners.
• Advocate that cap -and -trade revenues be expended in a manner that enables regions to meet
greenhouse gas reduction goals in SB 375 and AB 32.
13
" S u p p o r t p o l i c i e s t h a t p r o v i d e d e c i s i o n - m a k i n g a u t h o r i t y a n d f l e x i b i l i t y t o a g e n c i e s b e a r i n g
f i n a n c i a l r i s k f o r p r o j e c t s . O p p o s e p o l i c i e s t h a t p l a c e u n f u n d e d m a n d a t e s a n d o t h e r u n d u e
b u r d e n s a n d r e s t r i c t i o n s o n a g e n c i e s t h a t b e a r f i n a n c i a l r i s k f o r p r o j e c t s .
" S u p p o r t s t r o n g c o l l a b o r a t i v e p a r t n e r s h i p s w i t h s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l a g e n c i e s .
" S u p p o r t e f f o r t s b y t h e s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l g o v e r n m e n t s t o i m p r o v e m a i n t e n a n c e a n d o p e r a t i o n s
o f t h e s t a t e h i g h w a y a n d i n t e r s t a t e s y s t e m s . O p p o s e e f f o r t s t o r e a l i g n m a i n t e n a n c e a n d
o p e r a t i o n s c o s t s a n d r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s t o l o c a l o r r e g i o n a l a g e n c i e s .
" O p p o s e e f f o r t s b y t h e s t a t e l e g i s l a t u r e t o d e f l e c t r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r v o t i n g o n r e v e n u e f o r
s t a t e w i d e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n t o l o c a l v o t e r s .
" O p p o s e l e g i s l a t i o n t o i n c r e a s e b a r r i e r s t o t h e u s e o f c o n t r a c t i n g b y l o c a l g o v e r n m e n t .
A l t e r n a t i v e s t o D r i v i n g
R i d e s h a r i n g
" S u p p o r t i n c e n t i v e s t o e m p l o y e r s t h a t e n h a n c e o r c r e a t e t r a n s i t r e i m b u r s e m e n t o r r i d e s h a r i n g
p r o g r a m s .
" O p p o s e n e w m a n d a t e s o n e m p l o y e r s o r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a g e n c i e s t o p r o v i d e r i d e s h a r i n g
p r o g r a m s , o r a n y e f f o r t s t h a t w o u l d r e s u l t i n d i s r u p t i o n o f t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s r i d e s h a r i n g
p r o g r a m .
" S u p p o r t p r o g r a m s a n d p o l i c i e s t h a t s u p p o r t i n v e s t m e n t s i n n e w t e c h n o l o g i e s t h a t p r o m o t e
r i d e s h a r i n g , t r a f f i c i n f o r m a t i o n , a n d c o m m u t e r a s s i s t a n c e .
A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n
" S u p p o r t t h e s w i f t i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f n e w A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o g r a m .
" S u p p o r t m a x i m u m r e g i o n a l c o n t r o l o f p r o j e c t s e l e c t i o n f o r A c t i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P r o j e c t s .
T r a n s i t a n d R a i l
" S u p p o r t p e r m a n e n t p a r i t y i n f e d e r a l l a w b e t w e e n t a x - e x e m p t p a r k i n g b e n e f i t s a n d t r a n s i t p a s s
b e n e f i t s o f f e r e d b y e m p l o y e r s .
" S u p p o r t i n c e n t i v e s f o r t r a n s i t a g e n c i e s t h a t u t i l i z e a l t e r n a t i v e f u e l s .
" S u p p o r t i n c l u s i o n a n d p r i o r i t i z a t i o n o f C o a c h e l l a V a l l e y R a i l s e r v i c e i n t h e C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e R a i l
P l a n a n d o t h e r s t a t e p l a n n i n g a n d f u n d i n g e f f o r t s .
" A d v o c a t e f o r e x p e d i t i o u s a n d c e r t a i n r e v i e w s a n d a p p r o v a l s f o r g r e e n h o u s e - g a s - r e d u c i n g r a i l
a n d t r a n s i t p r o j e c t s .
" S u p p o r t i n c r e a s e s i n f u n d i n g f o r C a p i t a l I m p r o v e m e n t G r a n t s f o r n e w t r a n s i t s e r v i c e ( N e w a n d
S m a l l S t a r t s 5 3 0 9 p r o g r a m ) i n o r d e r t o c r e a t e f u n d i n g c a p a c i t y f o r f u t u r e r a i l e x p a n s i o n p r o j e c t s
a n d b u s r a p i d t r a n s i t s e r v i c e i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y .
" S u p p o r t e f f o r t s t o p r o v i d e a n e q u i t a b l e s h a r e o f f u n d i n g t o w e s t c o a s t i n t e r c i t y r a i l s y s t e m s a s
c o m p a r e d t o t h e N o r t h e a s t C o r r i d o r .
" S u p p o r t M e t r o l i n k ' s p o l i c y n e e d s w i t h r e g a r d t o i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f p o s i t i v e t r a i n c o n t r o l .
" S u p p o r t e f f o r t s t o p r i o r i t i z e h i g h - s p e e d r a i l f u n d i n g f o r c o n n e c t i v i t y i m p r o v e m e n t s t o e x i s t i n g
t r a n s i t s y s t e m s i n C a l i f o r n i a ' s u r b a n a r e a s .
1 4
" S u p p o r t i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f S B 1 2 2 5 ( P a d i l l a ) , w h i c h t r a n s f e r s o p e r a t i o n s o f t h e L o s A n g e l e s
S a n D i e g o S a n L u i s O b i s p o R a i l ( L O S S A N ) C o r r i d o r t o t h e L O S S A N J P A , o f w h i c h t h e C o m m i s s i o n
i s a v o t i n g m e m b e r .
" E n s u r e t h a t t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s r i g h t s a n d i n t e r e s t s i n p a s s e n g e r r a i l i n S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a a r e
p r o p e r l y r e s p e c t e d i n s t a t e , f e d e r a l , a n d r e g i o n a l p l a n s a n d p o l i c i e s .
" S u p p o r t a l l t r a n s i t o p e r a t o r s i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y w i t h l e g i s l a t i v e c o n c e r n s i m p a c t i n g t h e
o p e r a t o r s ' f u n d i n g a n d o p e r a t i o n s .
" S u p p o r t e f f o r t s t o r e s o l v e c o n f l i c t b e t w e e n t h e P u b l i c E m p l o y e e P e n s i o n R e f o r m A c t ( P E P R A )
a n d S e c t i o n 1 3 ( c ) o f t h e F e d e r a l T r a n s i t A c t t o e n s u r e t h a t f e d e r a l g r a n t f u n d s c o n t i n u e t o f l o w
t o l o c a l t r a n s i t a g e n c i e s .
" S u p p o r t e f f o r t s t o p r o v i d e f o r s t r e a m l i n e d p r o j e c t d e l i v e r y f o r t r a n s i t p r o j e c t s t h a t f u l f i l l t h e
g o a l s o f A B 3 2 a n d S B 3 7 5 , a s w e l l a s o t h e r s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l a i r q u a l i t y m a n d a t e s a n d m o b i l i t y
p e r f o r m a n c e m e a s u r e s .
T o l l i n g
" S u p p o r t l e g i s l a t i o n t h a t e n h a n c e s t h e f u l l a n d a c c u r a t e c a p t u r e o f t o l l r e v e n u e s , i n o r d e r t o
p r o t e c t t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s d e b t a n d c o n g e s t i o n m a n a g e m e n t o b l i g a t i o n s .
" M o n i t o r l e g i s l a t i o n m o d i f y i n g p r i v a c y l a w s t o e n s u r e a n a p p r o p r i a t e b a l a n c e b e t w e e n c u s t o m e r
p r i v a c y , p u b l i c s a f e t y , a n d f i n a n c i a l o b l i g a t i o n i s r e a s o n a b l y m e t .
" M o n i t o r l e g i s l a t i o n s i g n i f i c a n t l y a l t e r i n g t h e t y p e a n d / o r n u m b e r o f v e h i c l e s s u b j e c t t o f r e e o r
r e d u c e d t o l l r a t e s , i n o r d e r t o p r o t e c t t h e C o m m i s s i o n ' s d e b t a n d c o n g e s t i o n m a n a g e m e n t
o b l i g a t i o n s .
" M o n i t o r l e g i s l a t i o n a n d A d m i n i s t r a t i v e p o l i c i e s r e l a t i n g t o i n t e r o p e r a b i l i t y o f t o l l e d f a c i l i t i e s
s t a t e w i d e a n d n a t i o n a l l y , i n o r d e r t o e n s u r e t e c h n i c a l f e a s i b i l i t y , c o s t r e a s o n a b l e n e s s , a n d
c u s t o m e r s a t i s f a c t i o n .
G o o d s M o v e m e n t
" S u p p o r t r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s o f t h e H o u s e P a n e l o n 2 1 s t C e n t u r y F r e i g h t T r a n s p o r t a t i o n
" S u p p o r t C o n g r e s s i o n a l a c t i o n t o c r e a t e a n e w d e d i c a t e d f u n d i n g s o u r c e f o r g o o d s m o v e m e n t
p r o j e c t s , i n a s m u c h a s t h e f u n d i n g s o u r c e :
o H a s a n e x u s t o t h e u s e r ;
o D o e s n o t r e d u c e f u n d i n g t o e x i s t i n g h i g h w a y a n d t r a n s i t p r o g r a m s ;
o P r o v i d e s f u n d i n g t o C a l i f o r n i a , a n d S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a i n p a r t i c u l a r , c o m m e n s u r a t e w i t h
t h i s r e g i o n a n d s t a t e ' s s i g n i f i c a n c e t o i n t e r s t a t e g o o d s m o v e m e n t ; a n d
o C a n b e s p e n t o n g r a d e s e p a r a t i o n p r o j e c t s .
" P r o v i d e i n p u t t o t h e N a t i o n a l F r e i g h t A d v i s o r y C o m m i t t e e a n d C a l i f o r n i a S t a t e F r e i g h t A d v i s o r y
C o m m i t t e e .
" A d v o c a t e f o r a c c u r a t e r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y i n t h e P r i m a r y F r e i g h t N e t w o r k o r
o t h e r n a t i o n a l o r s t a t e w i d e f r e i g h t r o u t e d e s i g n a t i o n s .
P r o j e c t s
" S u p p o r t p r o g r a m s a n d p o l i c i e s t h a t a d v a n t a g e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p r o j e c t s i n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y ,
i n c l u d i n g b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o :
1 5
o Measure A -funded projects
o Grade separations
o Transit capital projects and operations by regional and municipal transit agencies
o Commuter rail capital projects and operations
o Intercity Rail Service to the Coachella Valley
o Local streets and road projects sponsored by the county and municipalities
o Active Transportation Projects
o Expansion and rehabilitation of the state highway system
o Interchanges
o Safety enhancements
o Mitigation of the impacts of goods movement
o Connectivity to high-speed rail
o Connectivity to commercial airports
o Tolled Express Lanes, tolled highways, and related infrastructure and technology
• Oppose policies that inhibit the efficient, timely delivery of such projects.
• Support implementation of projects in other counties that are contained in the Southern
California Association of Governments RTP/Sustainable Communities Strategy when requested
by other counties and not in conflict with the Commission's interests.
Funding
• Support robust testing and analysis of California's road user charging (RUC) pilot program as a
potential replacement of the state motor fuels excise tax as the primary funding mechanism for
transportation.
• Encourage the federal government to authorize a program to test and analyze a pilot program
to explore potential replacement mechanisms for the federal gasoline excise tax.
Support all efforts to maintain, at the very least, level state/federal funding for transportation
programs.
• Strongly support repayment of state general fund loans from transportation -related accounts.
• Support re -dedication of California truck weight fees to transportation accounts.
• Encourage Congress to adopt a long-term authorization bill that provides funding certainty,
preferably protecting the nexus between transportation funding and the gas tax.
• Monitor legislation relating to tax collection for impacts on Measure A revenues or
administration fees.
16
AGENDA ITEM 8
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 14, 2015
TO:
Riverside County Transportation Commission
FROM:
Aaron Hake, Government Relations Manager
THROUGH:
Anne Mayer, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
State Cap and Trade Funding and Disadvantaged Communities
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Commission to receive and file a report on state policies regarding State Cap
and Trade (CAT) funding and Disadvantaged Communities policies.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The twofold purpose of this report is to provide Commissioners with an understanding of new
state funding programs that are being implemented to expend CAT auction revenues, and also
understand those programs' relationship to an emerging state priority of focusing investments
in disadvantaged communities. Both the CAT program and the focus on disadvantaged
communities are new considerations for transportation agencies and local governments that
are not yet widely understood, and in many ways are still under development. Commission
staff hopes this report will encourage further conversation and collaboration among local
government leaders in Riverside County to develop strategies to secure additional funding for
projects.
CAT General Background
AB 32, by Senator Fran Pavley, the landmark legislation that set statewide objectives for
reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, included authorization of a program that capped
allowable carbon emissions by certain industries and created a market for carbon credits to be
purchased above the cap. This program is administered by the California Air Resources Board
(CARB). CARB holds regular auctions of carbon credits; the price of credits fluctuates based on
the market's demand. These credit purchases create a revenue stream to fund projects that
mitigate carbon emissions.
SB 535, authored in 2012 by the new President Pro-Tempore of the State Senate, Kevin DeLeon,
required that 25 percent of all CAT funds be spent in a manner that benefits disadvantaged
communities. Furthermore, 10 percent of all CAT funds must be spent on projects physically
located within disadvantaged communities. This legislation necessitated the creation of a data
driven tool to determine what a disadvantaged community is. The California Environmental
Protection Agency (CaIEPA) developed a tool known as CalEnviroScreen, which is discussed in
this report.
Agenda Item 11
51
CAT and AB 32 in general, generated controversy over its legality and impact on the business
climate in California. Nonetheless, the program is moving forward and is expected to generate
as much as $15 billion in revenue over its lifetime. The CAT program received media attention
recently due to the fact that the fuels sector became subject to the carbon cap as of January 1,
2015. Capping the fuels sector and forcing petroleum producers to purchase credits led many
to speculate the costs of CAT would be passed on to consumers at the gas pump to the order of
anywhere between 9C-50C/gallon. Contrary to the innuendo suggested by the messaging of
industry -led advocacy campaigns, such a price increase is not an increase in the state's motor
fuels excise tax (the gas tax).
The 2014/15 State Budget established how CAT revenues are to be allocated. Given the dearth
of funding for any type of state programs during the recession, the prospect of billions of new
state dollars created the government equivalent of a feeding frenzy in Sacramento. The
Commission advocated heavily alongside regional governments and other transportation
industry interests that significant shares of CAT revenues should be devoted to transportation
projects that reduce GHG emissions. This position was justified by the fact that nearly one-third
of all carbon emissions are generated from the transportation sector. Ultimately, this policy
desire was fulfilled as 35 percent of ongoing revenues were devoted to transportation related
programs and 25 percent was devoted to high-speed rail.
However, the second and equally important policy point the Commission pressed alongside
many others was regarding who selected projects that would be funded by CAT revenue. The
Commission believes that regional governments should play a major role in determining what
transportation projects are funded by CAT. The rationale for this request is the significant
mandate placed upon regional governments by SB 375 (State Senate Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg)
to reduce GHG's by specific amounts through their Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable
Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). Despite persistent effort, the budget gave nearly total control
of project selection to state agencies.
The state agencies given responsibility for spending CAT funds are currently in the midst of
finalizing guidelines to govern their new programs. In general, the agencies are under either
legal mandates or directives from the Governor's office to begin expending funds quickly.
CAT Programs of Immediate Interest
Within less than one month, two major CAT programs will have published guidelines and calls
for projects underway. While the draft guidelines for these two programs are extensive (15-81
pages), the summary table below provides highlights for local government leaders to make a
high-level assessment as to whether their jurisdiction has any projects that are in a state of
readiness to be competitive for the first cycle of funding for either of these programs:
Agenda Item 11
52
Responsible
Agency
Affordable Housing/Sustainable
Communities
Strategic Growth Council (SGC)
Transit Capital and Intercity Rail
California State Transportation Agency
(Ca ISTA)
Funds Available
FY 2014/15: —$120 million
Plus 20 percent of ongoing revenue
Applicants can only receive one
award. Depending on project type,
award size ranges between $500,000
and $15 million.
Likely only about a dozen projects
will be funded statewide
FY 2014/15: $25 million
Plus 10 percent of ongoing revenue
Applicants limited to 1 application greater
than $3 million and 1 application under $3
million
"Small number" of "transformative" projects
will be selected.
Status of
Program
Guidelines
Currently in Draft form.
Anticipated adoption 1/20/15
Currently in Discussion Draft form.
Anticipated adoption 2/6/15
First Application
Due Dates
Concept Applications Due: 2/19/15
(anticipated), followed by screening
by Metropolitan Planning
Organizations (MPO's) for RTP/SCS
consistency.
Full Application Invitations: 3/11/15
Full Applications Due: 4/16/15
4/10/15 (anticipated)
Eligible Projects
(summary)
Affordable housing, supporting infill
development, Transit -Oriented
Development, active transportation,
transit capital (supporting increased
ridership), complete streets
Rail capital; intercity and commuter rail
projects that enhance service, increase
reliability, and increase ridership; rail
integration projects (such as ticketing); Bus
Rapid Transit and enhanced bus services;
transit effectiveness studies
Eligible
Applicants
(summary)
JPA's, transit operators, "political
subdivisions of the state", and an
extended listing of types of private
sector entities
Transit operators
Agenda Item 11
53
Disadvantaged
Communities
Criteria
50 percent of funds must benefit
disadvantaged communities.
Benefit is defined as either:
• 50 percent of project is in a
disadvantaged community and
reduces VMT, or
• %2-mile walking distance from a
disadvantaged community or job
recruitment for the project
and/or job training occurs in the
disadvantaged community
25 percent of funds must benefit
disadvantaged communities.
Additional considerations for interested applicants:
• The first funding cycle is likely to be smallest and the quickest. The FY 2014/15 program
assigned discrete amounts of funding to each program, with an emphasis on spending
those first -year funds quickly. However, these programs were ascribed a total
percentage of whatever the CAT auction revenues become year -over -year. Therefore, it
is likely that the funding will grow for subsequent annual funding cycles. It is also
possible that future funding cycles will be multi -year in nature.
• The program guidelines could change after the first funding cycle. In many ways, the
first year of CAT funding is an experiment. The Administration is clearly interested in
getting projects on the street; that experience could shape future adjustments to the
program. Interested applicants will need to stay engaged.
• The Affordable Housing/Sustainable Communities application process will be laborious
and specific. Applicants will need to have the resources to meet the level of specificity
and undergo the layers of review required by the SGC. Several regional governments
and coalitions such as the California Association of Councils of Governments have raised
concerns about the complicated structure of the review process.
A Low Carbon Transit Operations program was also created by the FY 2014/15 budget, which is
more formula driven and is managed by the State Controller and Caltrans. Further information
regarding this program will be forthcoming on future agendas.
Disadvantaged Communities
The notion that geographic areas disproportionately burdened by environmental impacts are
deserving of increased governmental assistance is not new. In fact, the Commission spent
many years working with state and local partners to document environmental justice concerns
Agenda Item 11
54
throughout Riverside County, particularly with regard to freight movement. What is new,
however, is the emergence of state laws that prioritize transportation -related funding for
disadvantaged communities.
Most recently, this topic emerged as the state sought to update the law to accommodate for
the redesign of federal transportation programs after the passage of MAP-21 in 2012. Quotas
for spending federal funds in a manner that benefits disadvantaged communities were applied
to the new Active Transportation Program (ATP), a competitive program that superseded an old
formula -driven program for Transportation Enhancements (TE). Riverside County fared
remarkably well in the first round of ATP funding, led by the CV Link project sponsored by
Coachella Valley Association of Governments.
At the same time, SB 535 emerged as discussed earlier, placing requirements on new CAT
revenue to be spent in disadvantaged communities. Work already underway at CaIEPA on the
CalEnviroScreen tool provided a scientific mechanism for the state to quantitatively and
qualitatively measure cumulative environmental health impacts on specific communities and
identifies those communities with the greatest "disadvantage."
What is CalEnviroScreen?
CalEnviroScreen is a compilation of data measuring over a dozen types of pollution and
population factors to create an overall score that denotes a particular community's health
vulnerability to pollution. Communities are measured by Census Tract. Scores are assigned
relative to all other Census Tracts in the state (think of grading on a curve in school). The top
25 percent Census Tracts are then designated by CaIEPA as disadvantaged communities. To
make the information easiest to comprehend, the results of CalEnviroScreen are transformed
into a map of the state, divided by its 5,000 Census Tracts. On the map, the public can view the
degree of disadvantage of each Census Tract relative to the others, and also see which are
officially designated as disadvantaged for the purposes of CAT funding.
Since its initial rollout in 2012, CalEnviroScreen has already undergone an update that was
finalized in October 2014; one of the significant additions to the tool relevant to the Inland
Empire is the consideration of unemployment rates.
How is CalEnviroScreen Applied to CAT Funding?
As discussed, each CAT program is likely to have a different share of funds that need to be
spent to the benefit of disadvantaged communities. Phraseology of state law and
administrative guidelines matter significantly. How "benefit" is defined may not necessarily be
scientific, and interpretation of even the most stringent administrative language may still
remain subjective. In some cases, however, there is a clear mandate that some percentage of
funding must be physically spent in a disadvantaged community. Applicants for CAT funding
will need to closely scrutinize CalEnviroScreen data for the applicant's project area and
understand the thrust of the guidelines under which the applicants are applying.
Agenda Item 11
55
It is important to note that nowhere in state law or in any of the draft program guidelines is
disadvantaged community benefit a prerequisite to receive funding. Projects outside of these
Census Tracts can still be funded; however these projects will not count towards the quota.
General wisdom is that in order to be most competitive for such a limited pot of funding,
projects should benefit disadvantaged communities.
Does CalEnviroScreen Help Riverside County?
Major portions of Riverside County are designated by CaIEPA as disadvantaged, according to
CalEnviroScreen 2.0. Review of the map, which is attached, will find much of the urban
northwestern county and large areas of the eastern Coachella Valley are covered.
Theoretically, this means there is reasonable cause for Riverside County to look at CAT as a
viable funding source for sustainable communities projects.
Regions such as the Central Valley, central Los Angeles, and Imperial County also are home to
large swaths of territory designated as disadvantaged. Other areas of the state are less
enthusiastic about CalEnviroScreen. The Bay Area shows relatively few Census Tracts as
disadvantaged, and Orange and Ventura Counties have only small, compact areas.
Looking Forward
Staff is reaching out to partner agencies such as transit operators and councils of governments
to understand how Riverside County can best position itself for CAT funding and ensure that
decision -makers at the state level understand the nature of the Commission's communities.
Since CAT funding programs are new, there will be a trial period for applicants in learning how
the process works and the type of projects that are successful in receiving funding awards.
Workshops on the programs have been presented by SGC and CaISTA. Cities and transit
operators interested in applying for the first cycle will need to quickly prepare the requisite
material. Collaboration and partnering with other agencies to produce an integrated project
may also be necessary. Although the Commission is not eligible to directly apply for CAT funds,
projects that enhance commuter rail could be suitable for these funds.
A public workshop to discuss funds available under CAT programs will be held at the city of
Riverside City Hall on January 30, 2015 from 3:00-5:00 p.m. This workshop is being hosted by
State Senator Richard Roth and Assemblyman Jose Medina, in partnership with the city of
Riverside and UC Riverside. It is expected that staff from CARB and SGC will be presenting
information for interested applicants for CAT funds. It is highly recommended that any
jurisdictions interested in these programs attend this workshop. A copy of the invitation from
Senator Roth is attached to this item.
Additionally, agencies interested in applying for either the first cycle or future cycles should
contact Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director, to further discuss project
proposals and how CalEnviroScreen applies to projects.
Agenda Item 11
56
Attachments:
1) CalEnviroScreen presentation by OEHHA
2) CalEnviroScreen 2.0 Map of Riverside County
3) Invitation to Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funds Workshop —January 30
Agenda Item 11
57
luawssassd NezeH upleaH leluawuomu] Jo aow.p `Ijaaxald aSJoag'8 lsned MO('
V.-EN `ZZ 21381A13noN
S1111NrIV\IIAIOD VINHOdlit0
DNI1VMVA3 HOJ pool V :N3aaDgoainN31\0
I INTATHDVIIV
diall•Mi. armors
ilinommat forearm
Islissionv ishmearaw,
CALENVIROSCREEN
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCREENING
TOOL, VERSION 2.0
(CALENViROSCREEN 2.0
GUIDANCE AND SCREENING TOOL
f1kr1lM� Podtw .i, Slrrrrhary
CnIffronirr EnwromrMrll PrnlMlvel Avian
Gory;p V_ AI«ru.N Ph.D., Dtrrryor
Nfir+01 Erviron.+rIn, NM1111w1rn r1
Screening tool used to help
identify California
communities that are
disproportionately burdened
by multiple sources of
pollution and vulnerability
Identifies 19 indicators of
environmental and
socioeconomic conditions
Latest version August 2014
2
DEVELOPMENT OF CALENVIROSCREEN
2008+
Nine public meetings
of the Cumulative
Impacts and
Precautionary
Approaches Work
Group.
April and August
2014
CalEnviroScreen 2.0
released for public
comment andii
finalized
December 2010
Framework report
released
Cumulative Impacts:
Building a Scientific
Foundation
April and
September 2013
CalEnviroScreen 1.0
and 1.1 finalized.
60
July 2012
First CalEnviroScreen
draft report released
for public comment.
Summer -Fall 2012
12 public workshops,
academic workshop,
1,000 oral and
written comments.
Revised draft
released
BASIS OF CONCERN FOR CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
Numerous studies have shown that multiple pollution
sources are disproportionately concentrated in low-
income communities with high -minority populations.
Studies have reported communities with certain
socioeconomic factors (i.e., low-income, low -education)
have increased sensitivity to pollution.
Combination of multiple pollutants and increased
sensitivity in these communities can result in higher
cumulative pollution impacts.
Issues reviewed in:
California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard
Assessment. "Cumulative Impacts: Building a Scientific Foundation", (2010)
Sacramento, CA http://oehha.ca.gov/ej/pdf/ClReport123110.pdf
Z9
seam DiL{deAoa9 uaannlaq uosiaeduaoo aoj snnoll`d
paseq Aiideaoag
aEns Aliunuauaoo AiOnoa le uoileuaaolui sapino.ad
saope}oivaouopaopos pue'suopipuop ypieay'i(ling.isuas
uon.eindod 'suonipuoo leluauauoainua 'saansodx3
saopej aidtlinua luasaadaa elea
Dios '.IalpM 'aiy
eipaua aldi}pua uaoal uoileuaaolui sauiquaoo
alduais Alan!lelaH
100i DNIN33113S JO S3t1f11V33
qualnijiod Aijiigaaauinn pasaanu!
ui 4insaa ijaq4 spi_isiaapaaagp Ounuauao3
saansodxa 4ualnliod
fo spalia Apubow Amu ijaq.l (smais qi jaaq
buipnpui) siiaa lapp5oloiq ip!An suo oindod
saoped
Di wouopaopos
suoileindod
anwsuas
riliM spamod
Aq pasnnD suopipuo3 iaquauiuognua asaanp y
uopnllod gijm 43041,1o3
SDLISIIBIDVIJVHD NO1lVindOd
Y$ N3421f18 Nousmod
tI9
luaaanD
area nDoy
apinnale1S
(apnOuoi/apmllei
`ssaappe'•9•a) uon.euaao}ui paseq-uop.epoi
amenene Apiignd
samenb eked
b'd31e3 Aq algeuope
aq Aeua mil sanssi ol aleiaa wogs saoleoipui uoilnilod
suoi�ipuop oivaouopaoi�os
ao leluawuwinua Jo aa�nseaua pooh e apinoad
NO113313S 1101VDION1 NOS Vit131110
INDICATORS USED
IMMIc4itition—oll Characteristics
Environmental �-�-- 5ensitive
Exposures
❑ PM 2.5
concentrations
❑ Ozone
concentrations
❑ Diesel PM
emissions
❑ Drinking water
contaminants
❑ Pesticide use
❑ Toxic releases from
facilities
❑ Traffic density
Effects Populations jid
❑ Cleanup sites
❑ Groundwater
threats (Leaking
underground tanks
and cleanups)
❑ Impaired water
bodies
❑ Solid waste sites
and facilities
❑ Hazardous waste
facilities and
generators
65
❑ Prevalence of ❑
children and elderly
❑Asthma emergency
department visit
rate
❑ Rate of low birth
weight births
Socioeconomic
Factors
Educational
attainment
Linguistic isolation
Poverty: Percent
residents below 2x
national poverty
level
❑ Unemployment
pasn Aluowwoj
(00018- 00Z`i aue.i)
pe,11 Jac! aidoad 000`tr,,
eLwopieD
ui speA snsuao 000`8,,,
aleos @Liu. AianileiaH
snsuaD oioz
99
SfISN3D WW1 1VD1FidV}I9039
HOW WERE INDICATORS STANDARDIZED TO
CENSUS TRACTS?
Indicator datasets exist in different formats
Tabular, vector -based, spatial models
Each indicator is summarized at
census tract
For example, each tract was assigned a
PM25 concentration
Unique methods implemented for each indicator
Spatial modeling, averaging, intersection with census
tracts, etc.
67
1D
(00T xew)
amps
uaanscu!nu3ieD
(oi )
s3gs!aapeanyo
uogei ndod
Camp auozo'ALaanod }uapaad a i) aolepipui apnilami
°\'° °c° °"° °'4
,10.1031p1.1! aidwax3
wrung
uogniiod
uoilngia1sip apinnalels
ui smell! aaaLinn
uo paseq amen anuailad
e paAsse si span snsua3
pea `aoleopui pea aod
DNIIIODS
69
1 talu "Zsaa/1a/no6 •na •o y yao/%d.n y
�aoda r ano aas 'pasn sap!.isad acp fo 6upsy aialdcuoa o aoj*
w alsAs Rana n s p u ei o u g n d
au1 Pp pia al!w Ix' LIDea
ui paiidde sappilsad jo spunod
asn aaann
sapid}sad le!lualod aansodxa
aapue oixol aaoua lasgns
:p}ep Mpa
aano pa�eaane) alp (aa � bs�ad
sluaipaa2ui anipe asn-leanlinoia2e
uoilonpoad *papaias Jo spunod
:aoi.e3ipui
(uopain6ay
appi-lsad o .�uaua.�aadaQ aivaojila3)
�ui}aodaH ash apppsad
:a3anos e}ea
4t11 '
I`r
F J I#I
.l
Nip
,.���d :37dWb'X3l101b'JIONI
pan snsuao Aq
smaA E aano pa eJane uatp
pawwns sapplsad
aad spunod asn appgsad
jo uon.aodoad pale3011d
speJ19uiddepano
aldninw Loin\ suopas
pea aleposse poLgaw
luawuo!Liodde-eaad
eivaopieD ssone
snsuao uo piepno
(suopas) ppS allua •bs ti
:sisAleud
St380StOW6£
8Z380St01%E
eZ330St 0146i
91.380S1 0YF6£
0£330Si01
(t 3e0St 006£ It360St
3sn 30131.1S3d :37dWb'X3 HODOIGNI
sapotisad papaw oN
L'T06 t tr'£ - Z•T
L'106. 5'T9T 11111 El • tr'0
D"191.-86E £•0-Z'0
C6£ - Z't I :'0
1'0 >
auw wenbs Jad swalpaaeu!
ampe papalas to spunod
ash appgsad
•sanDap olui pazilogwAs seen
elep 'sapplsad jo
spunod uo paseq speal snsua3
ssone paleinoleo sanuaDJad
siins3H 3sn 301311S3d
(suoSAIod) saiaepunoq
axis pue (slu!od) suoilepoi AmpL'j
:elep met
loan snsuao
ui suoilendod Al!w!xoad
uo paseq sly iann palsnfpe
•sapaaleo •ola
`asuodsaawls `punpadns leaapa j
•peel snsuao pea u!Lil!nn
salts dnueap palLpann jo wns
:aolepipui
sa poiad IouopoN dd3 sn lanuo3
sapua_isgns Dixol fo 4uaLuvodaa oivaopia3
asegelea salis dnueeD aolsomu3
:a3anos elea
n02' e d a'MMM
S3.11S drita/313 :37dWb'X3 daLbOIC1N1
EL
saopel luaualsnfpe
Aq pauauans saaooS Alivaixoad y}inn aa}}nq 9uu-mnw
aa}}nq y}inn depano uo sn�e�s
paseq aaoDs uan0 span snsuai pue adAl. uo paseq pali.pann saris
:sisAieud
S311S P41313 :37d1Alb'X3 Halt/310Ni
CLEANUP SITES RESULTS
•
Percentiles calculated
across census tracts
based on buffered,
weighted cleanup sites,
data was symbolized into
deciles.
. 11.
Los An
',wars- Eve
NRCAti GeaBase
.61t'ApA MapTvortha
Cleanup Sites
Sum of Weighted
'EnviroStor' Sites
c 0.8 7.0 - 95
0.8-t4 9.6-12.6
1.5-28 MO 12.7-17,8 "
2.9-44 El 17.9-30.0
4.5-6.9 111>30.0
No sites
Cteanup Sites
_ .1111
"111.1111•1101114
NL Ordnance ur,,, .laden 6E'I : s^ Ch,na : ••v,p r:cn
eetllipc,r oo.to^r. rrc Ira :>S Later CDrrtraorty, '
17
qua}y•Zsap/►a/no�•eyeyqao•nnnnnn
asegelepoa2 SIJ�ad
a�i� s��nsaa (The] @poop
snsuao jo laayspeaads lapx3
elep Jain()
s��nsaa Jo sdew auqup
uoileoiiddd OuiddeW
aolepipui wee Jo uogd!nsaa
saoleD!pui ienpAipuiaolsdeA
1.a0d01:1 uaansw!Au3l eD
siins3u 318V-I vny Annend
"
O N L I N E T O O L
C a l E n v i r o S c r e e n 2 0
C a l E n v i r o 5 c r e e n 2 . 0 s c o r e s
" ( v y c � 1 J i n t , + r 1 ' A t ! ' a l -
C . a i t r s r N n x r u o e e s r e r a k u t o t e c b y r " e r l t r * m g t a r
m o n / d u a l ' M a c o n t r t a t m a l l " u p C a r
t O p o L L t o c n e x p o s u r e s , e r r r o m m e r s n . .
c n a r a c t e r s t o e .
" A t 1 n Q ( * C O S 4 1 4 " " - " " : 1 M o M j r k w " .
d i n a r i n t h e t , o t i < " / s e x "
, p t r a a : n M . . C o n g r e F a r m n l e . I m o 4
- g l e e s t O . e a w e "
a t i a k a a r a i t t i e " . � " .
r e o f f r a t b i h t
' o e a p t o r e m e m a p , Z O O M t o o r t y p e a ' m e m o i n t o t h e s e w * , f a s t C u f f i n g
t e i a W u l f f , h a i r O a * " a p v c a W e i n e X x n w t i T l n e + n O W u r l r e s d 4 5 I c e
* o r b o r t h e 1 4 * e l e m i t M a l m o l e * i y i t s G f t n o n : 4 0 . e m g o e r
; A s p : e U i e r a i t e b r F e t e i r c t z l e t r u f f l e y o u r c u r r e n t l o c a t i o n . * m o i l i r e
, e g e n t l . O w i n g b a s e m a p s , v l e t r e n g a t e g t o r e r o r e n M �% m a p . g e t t i n g
7 e l e r : t r u e m g t h e r t a p W e , * m e w * e l s e " a n d p r e c u t t h e O t o p p d v o t o
r . 4
: F r 7 "
"
l a w *
4 1 i N t s
A v a i l a b l e a t : o e h h a . c a . g o v / e j / c e s 2 . h t m l
1 1
L . S t " ^ a
C a l E n v t r o S c f e e n : ; f m a i
C r I I E n i e r 0 S s r e e x c 2 9 i t e s r s t s
�% l o w e s t s c o r e s ( b o t t o m 1 0 % )
�% 1 1 - 2 0 %
" a ? 1 3 0 %
3 1 . 1 0 %
4 1 5 0 ' %
5 1 - b 0 %
6 1 - 7 0 %
�% 7 1 - 6 0 %
�% e i 6 0 %
�% K g r i e s 1 S c o o p s ; 4 1 1 0 ! " .
M a t t p O r k 1 1 1 O n k w * p O ( u % t t t i o n
G
/ g
uoueindod Mq •uopnuod Ya
l%CO, t6! S410IC I541,01-4
•.rrl - 1 y
- IL
%I)! 19
°.Q3 tS
vj5'It
*eat ' tr
`:06 ' tL
%0Z tt
1'411 uloga9! Sat0Y3 ISeMOi
k
SWIM 0 Z UNt'N0I1eU30e0
*weer, as
iw14•Zsap/fa/na•ereiyao :fie amellend
lonwirinialp
*pm Is 4ir41y 1{/Jw!
••A v3 • it. 0•
1
.411Mlt t; } e: 1.10EiCxaClJlhl3' L j
ea te pactie.ta iJl luau Kt pew'asta aucauJus 49M l7eW at.l Su•+eus veiap
Mwuaif 'dew +.atuww Ievro+& r &swat. Itteu. army *Aura) pule,
•n jl ,a►.n virp,vt L1a aru eat 8uq w1 apry,u a.r a 011eeNte SKO1 deY1
anon uaaiarf.atamv3 t= fa-i agp.+4 Wu: sxrun1Pw 3. Jut 1* tpea
,uy :,grnaa tenp..p.+ a47 tow trap,we dmlod a twrCels LZ1: vrsual a uv
I+nvte,1 llYl V?,ea7 41411 can vMlem a a951 ,* O: tu9W l u tau exed.e V!
asamaPl as ;te?a tt p.e aN ut,e) at$oao taayipaais
PM3 ue to apetsnr *sic am uprzro ata u Map
u path clap ale taus aui SU/ut'tuatt at;e ✓llapce4teu, Oue s,aaeaper aeu
6343+,atie,lRf,
wAUpttuaci pail wottgrtet itq autmtNua taa nceisa uagnwd of
mew stountaw avtu u ansaarener? do team MS s►assapa teetpwpta
01 ,ai WWI aUl 1!ulat7W*314q OaOe/ IVI aW Saaon au. tn*,a01,3
ut l:ie l Sraua) u7M 101 OK,,S `I i ON. tKO n..+3Ri 342 SWOIS dew €.11
saioDs p z ttaansoiinu3je)
p Z uaa.oso.uta31e,
1001 3N11NO
4u Pur IMSi I dhu+sre
f
-
ssJon ayJ 10 go sswsaiC+u ;
501035 isatA4
saio3s isamoi
upset! 0.z
u88.1393a1nu31e0
8L sallIN 08 000Z 0
4
( r
sJaiwdns elep stl p,e 1453 1..7i ceusaseg
�1!W OZ
r r i r r r 1
01 $ 0
6L
ea iv salag uy so)
r�^4i ioN ..• 1.5 a H= { -14_44:3.!Fm51 so, •xasjDA
.,•,:':ne}'�[ Ina ssa_flOs
Lir
wi e
r'
ApLn"r ti.
f;
Y „
• . *1
t.,.n.
k a- .+.
Y*..-"e r
1 P.
1
1••4.
s�io�s yl jc Noo[ st.hts.uda. 40ew 4l03
SOJO)S salo,s
35 M isamoi
slinsati 0'Z
uaansoainu31ep
uoileindod Moi 'uoftnpod %hoz ool
uancldns eiep oqe 12153 DI :a`inos cewaseg
1 i i 1
s�1�W OT S
08
tax(' oyspuesj ue5
l:'
WIOJS iy7lU [ Slu4sJudi. JO:01:00j
saio3s
0.1411144
isamoi
uaa. 350ainu31ea
sa,n�� sllnsaa 0'Z
elep pis3 :a3gios Clew.*Se@
;NW 01
SZ
18
eaJv °Sam ues
94:42issliv 1LLDL.;
.porzwo Gan.. 1:1 LI-Jo
cleu.um.La ; tKil.f.3.02.-4,
- • •
• lemw
lisPmPel
••••wr
.49 trL •
F 4
L I
'
14/0.)S 040,1 IQ %Or SjUlSJUdai .1010.2 gpo3
salo3s
4%4441114
taw, ys
rsamoi
=kw-
slinsam
uaansoi!Au31eD
uogaindod mai 'uo!osod ,soz dal
I Ir i I
OZ OT fl
Z8
e4ep sti s>,J e Itfs3 1.3 j cewasei3
AaHen u!nbrof un
.1_ . z 11441.s..Ka5.—
,zAcipir31 Lijca9aa,-,
it y
•• dio3 d
- *-1.7.-WOrt 05-9 SZ13,,,VS
.01
I bar° .1 I
0.41bmi.
911M11.11
114111.41
144w% ayjlo 9i,or sitiasaJda, Joto3 <pal
SaJOYS
lia4044
1111•1111•1111
114111036
Isamoi
1
slinsam
uaanscu!numej
T 1 j
s,anclans etep stl pup 1453 a:%.nos e.ewaseg
GAI, W GT
5
5-2
0
,,i:f 51:1 aq pun •aDOIcS.ee4 'C .+ 914:a11
sRCe•ifi3..7411F4:4
uewlylu=.-
54i0>! OW 10 %or %tuJSJudi. Am., .003
saioas
46.441
£8
Ipp.a t0) S
isamoi
i
easy owautenes
silnsaa p•Z
uaa.i3Soainu31e3
" e p a l p o p a e z e u l e l u a w u w n u a p u e i p l e a u D H g n d
` p i w o u o p a o p o s ` D i L i d e A o a 2 u o p a s e q s a i l ! u n l a o d d o l u a w l s a n u i
a o l s a i l i u n w w o o p a S e l u e n p e s ! p A P 1 u a p i H e l l s d d 3 / 1 e 3
( Z I O Z ` u o a i a a ) s E s I I ! 8 a l e u a s e ! u a o m e i
s l u e a g 2 u ! u u e l d s a ! l ! u n w w o 3 a n e u ! e l s n s
i p u n o j p ! S a l a a l s e ! u a o p i e j
s a p i n p e d n u e a p - a l ! s a z ! l p o p d
a i a o p i s e l .
��. u a u a a ��a o ��u 3 p u e a p u e ! i d w o 3 a p ! . s n r ! e l u a w u o m u 3
w e a w d l u e J D H e w s a D p s n r I e l u a w u o m u 3
d d 3 1 e 3 u ! l i m 2 u l i e w - u o ! s p a p p u e 2 u ! u u e l d 2 u p 2 u o u ! p ! d
S I 1 0 0 1 3 H 1 M O H
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
OEHHA :
John Faust
Laura August
George Alexeeff
Komal Bangia
Rose Cendak
Lara Cushing
Vanessa Galaviz
Allan Hirsch
Tamara Kadir
Julian Leichty
Carmen Milanes
Shankar Prasad
Andrew Slocombe
Karen Randles
Robbie Welling
Lauren Zeise
THANK YOU!
email: CalEnviroScreen@oehha.ca.gov
more info: www.oehha.ca.gov/ej
Ca!/EPA :
Miriam Barcellona Ingenito
Arsenio Mataka
Gina Solomon
Other thanks:
• Cumulative Impacts and Precautionary
Approaches Work Group
• CaIEPA Boards and Departments who provided
comments and data
• California Environmental Health Tracking Program
and the Public Health Institute who provided data
• Residents and stakeholders who participated in
our regional workshops
• Dr. Tara Zagofsky, consultant and facilitator,
University of California, Davis, Common Ground:
Center for Cooperative Solutions
• Dr. Rachel Morello-Frosch and academic
colleagues at the University of California, Berkeley
• Academic expert panel who provided comments at
a workshop in September 2012
• Graduate students assisting in the project
85
ATTACHMENT 2
Maps of SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities in Riverside County according to
CalEnviroScreen 2.0
View interactive maps online at: http://www.calepa.ca.govanvJustice/GHGlnvest/
Western Riverside County
+ SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities
L t S
o reh
a
V
Jlw
:•il•;er.xle
.1..111.J1 In
rod ola
dill;
St Mission
•
4 A 4 z
I•11.
Itelrotl
c a ^4 * 4 ANA
Rancho
Santa
Margarita
h++l
N S
.16 Y. •��
a�tls
LrnJa I:rylt
t.la'„r�•� Yucaipa
YUCA'r
r.lernone
m I
1 h i � l iain
has . _ _,1�..
S4mng,. J pN
prA :uti �41N
Lake
Isin\ •
Se11co
Hills
ei in
Park
Quail
Valley
Canyon
Lake
VALLEY___ ___so
Lake Petri:
Stale
ReaeaticnAraa
Nua o
CA.Ga W
THE BADLANDS aant---
.r
9
Z
L A K E V 1 E W
MOUNTAINS
Romoland HumelanU
W inchest.x
n
� San
Jaclnt
t
E
H
86
Coachella Valley
+ SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities
111 0 * 01 < 0
11.,fian
()mot, Coachella
W.111^11-1
Blythe
Peler.a.on
"0•Ei.,0*
SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities
ft CI t, <
10•014 .1E•111•• •
c orioNit'000
P.40UNTAINS
r
s
VALLEY
MANIOBRA
CANYON
4 AI OfiN TA / NS
C N Li C K WA
—40.W
r
87
ATTACHMENT 3
STATE CAPITOL
ROOM 4034
SACRAMENTO. CA 95614
TEL.9161651.4031
FAX ,916, 327.21(37
SENATOR ROTHOSENAtE eA GO'r
December 23, 2014
(California ,tate enate
Aaron Hake.
Government Relations Manager
RCTC
4080 Lemon. Street, 3rd Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
SENATOR
RICHARD D. ROTH
THIRTY-FIRST DISTRICT
RE: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funds Workshop - January 30, 2015
Dear Mr. Hake:
ICES
BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE NO 4
STATE ADMINISTRATION &
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
CHAfR
LEGISLATIVE ETHICS
LHAIR
BANKING & FINANCIAL
INSTITUTIONS
BUDGET & FISCAL REVIEW
INSURANCE
JOINT LEGISLATIVE BUDGET
TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING
VETERANS AFFAIRS
It is our pleasure to invite you to join Senator Richard D. Roth, Assemblymember Jose Medina, the City of
Riverside, and the University of California, Riverside Centex for Sustainable Suburban Development for an
informative workshop to discuss monies available as a result of SB 535/AB '1532: California Global Wartning
Solutions Act of 2006: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund.
These laws authorize and provide the State a clear path to use cap -and -trade proceeds as part of a strategy
that places a priority on investments that benefit disadvantaged communities. A panel of experts from the
Air Resources Board, Strategic Growth Council and other agencies that are in charge of distributing; the
monies have also been invited.
The workshop will take place on Friday. January 30, 2015, from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the Riverside
City Council Chambers at Riverside City Hall, 3900 Main Street, Riverside, CA 92522.
For more information, please contact Violeta Aguilar-Wyrick at (951) 680-6750, ext. 102 or Rachel Gonzaga
at (951) 369-6644. RSVP to Violeta Aguilar-Wyrick at Violeta.Aguilar-Wyrick@sen.ca.gov.
We hope to see you there and look forward to meeting with you.
Respectfully,
C
RICHARD D. ROTH l()S►'; ,AIf',DINA
Senator, 31" District \ssemblymember, 61" District
88
AGENDA ITEM 9
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 26, 2014
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Eric DeHate, Staff Analyst
LoreIle Moe -Luna, Senior Staff Analyst
SUBJECT:
2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
2015 FTIP
Staff is happy to announce the transition from the 2013 FTIP to the 2015 FTIP. The 2013
FTIP expired on December 15, 2014 and was replaced with the 2015 FTIP. The 2015 FTIP
approval also included Amendment No. 2 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS, securing the air quality
conformity determination for non-exempt/modeled project changes included in the 2015 FTIP.
Concurrently with the 2015 FTIP and Amendment No. 2 to the 2012-2035 RTP/SCS, SCAG
also secured the approval of Formal Amendment No. 1 on December 15, 2014, as well as
Administrative Modification No. 2 on December 16, 2014. Amendment No. 3 was processed
by SCAG and included an emergency amendment for the Orange County Transportation
Authority; RCTC did not participate in this formal amendment.
A subsequent formal amendment (15-04) opened up in December 2014, and RCTC
participated in this amendment, which included changes to 28 projects. The amendment
submittal was December 23; the anticipated approval is mid -February.
There is a consistency amendment (15-99, holding place) currently being reviewed by SCAG
that includes seven projects (six state highways and one local highway), reflecting additional
changes to modeled projects that were not initially included in the 2016 RTP/SCS. The
consistency amendment will be approved in June 2016 concurrently with the 2016 RTP/SCS.
There are some pros and cons to this consistency amendment. The major pro is that
projects could make changes to completion dates or modeling changes and the project would
reflect the changes in the 2015 FTIP around June 2016. The major con to this consistency
amendment is that projects would be locked for additional changes until the 2016 Regional
Transportation Plan (RTP) is approved.
Attached to this staff report is the 2015 Amendment Log that includes the currently approved
amendments as well as the pending amendment approvals and the schedule for upcoming
amendments up to July 2015.
To view the latest 2015 FTIP listings, please visit SCAG's website below:
http://ftip.scag.ca.gov/Pages/2015/approved.aspx
The following table is SCAG's current 2015 FTIP amendment schedule up to August 2015.
2015 FTIP Amendment/Administrative Modification Schedule
Due to RCTC
Due to SCAG
Amendment/Administrative
Modification No.
Formal or Administrative
2/10/2015
2/17/2015
15-05
Administrative
3/24/2015
3/31/2015
15-06
Formal
5/5/2015
5/12/2015
15-07
Administrative
6/16/2015
6/23/2015
15-08
Formal
7/27/2015
8/4/2015
15-09
Administrative
Attachment: 2015 FTIP Amendment Log
2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program - Amendment Submittals and Approval Dates
2015 FTIP
Purpose
No. of Projects
Due to RCTC
Due to SCAG
Anticipated Approval
Final Approval
Final
Update
381
10/7/2013
1 /3/2014
12/17/2014
12/15/2014
Amendment 1
Formal Amendment
81
8/5/2014
8/12/2014
12/17/2014
12/15/2014
Amendment 2
Administrative Modification
13
10/27/2014
11/4/2014
12/29/2014
12/16/2014
Amendment 3*
Administrative Modification
0
Amendment
Formal Amendment
28
12/16/2014
12/23/2014
2/15/2015
Amendment 5
Administrative Modification
2/10/2015
2/17/2015
3/10/2015
Amendment 6
Formal Amendment
3/24/2015
3/31/2015
5/12/2015
Amendment
Administrative Modification
5/5/2015
5/12/2015
5/31/2015
Amendment 8
Formal Amendment
6/16/2015
6/23/2015
8/4/2015
Amendment 9
Administrative Modification
7/27/2015
8/4/2015
8/25/2015
Amendment 99
RTP Consistency Amendment
7
12/2/2014
12/9/2014
4/1/2016
Total Number of Projects
510
RCTC did not participate in this amendment. This amendment was for OCTA
2015 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of January 15, 2015
1/15/2015 - 2:05 PM Page 1 of 17
L4 to Z a6ed
Wd 90:Z - S 40Z/94/4
xslx•601 luawpuawV d11A 940Z
1.# IS 6ul;sll;oafald pednoJO
1740Z '9;sn6nV pa;ep 6w;sil ddOHS 1740Z -lad;oafald maN
(S3NV1 13AV2i11VN011100V ON) S3JQIHS ON110f1HISN003H
HO S1N3WAAVd MOHHVN ONINAOIM '(9Z4 osn £Z) A3113H AONAOH31A13
'NOI1V11118VHAH HO/0NV ONIOVAH0SAH 1NAW3AVd - Z 318V11dW3X3 9ZV£6
121Vd 2HAO Ob /M 1N31SISN00 3HV S1O3f02id WVHOOHd NOI1VAHAS3Hd AVMaVOH
ddOHS - NOI1V11118VH3H HO/ONV ONIOVAHrIS3H 1N31A13AVd HOd S1O3f0Hd 03df1OHO
ZOS1AIH
SNVd11V0
•Z# IS 6ul;sil;oa(ald padnoa0
bIOZ `9Z �I"f Pa;ep 6ui;s11 ddOHS b40Z gad asea�oul;so0
"SHAA011fld J1om' AON3O213W3 'S1NWAHdWl
ONI1H011 'Vfl 3Hl 301S1f10 l01 `OW30 ONINHVW 1WAd 'SN1OSHA1N11AONI 1V S1OCHd
1VNOIS N1OSHAIN1 'SIVNOIS NVHl 213H10 1SISSV ONI1VH3d0/S301A30 -NINO OIdAV211
`S1NWAHdW1 2101f10HS 'SC1H WAISAS 01V-03A-NON H3AVS 'SONISS0210 AMH/ H/H
- £'SZ SA18V11dW3X3 9Z4'£6 IHVd HAO Ob/M 1N31SISN00 AHV S103f0Hd WVHOOHd
NOIlOfl0321 NOISSI1100 ddOHS - S1N3W3AOHdWl A13AVS HOA S103f0Hd 03df OHO
IOS1AR1
SNV2i11V0
11\19L179Z0 ON 6u1X HH ioasn) 01
10;o1 s6uissoJO apeJO/0£4 uopes 1e001 aol 1W210 sue4e0 wall
pa;sanbaJ;oafald -saA leluuaJpenO dlld 940Z ay; ul ),0afald AAaN
(1A19L179Z0 'ON ONIX HH 100Sf1 01 10) AVM11VH ASNS 0NV
133211S 30f1HdS AO N01103SN31NI 3H11V ONISSOHO 30VHO OVOHlIVH 1V SOHVZVH
31VNIW113 - SNVH11V0 HOA 301SHAAIH AO A110 3H1 NI A1Nf100 301SH3A1H N2i31S3M NI
L£80174A121
SNVHI-VO
(040H0 V3 '34L00 'ONdd) dllS VIOZ ay; wall;oafald meN
'ONISSOHO 3dIlalIM
V 1onaLSN00 - OI OH HAAIH N3AHO 0/M 'IW L.0 `WV0 OOVHd AO MS 'IN 9.4 1f108V `31\111
A1Nf100 3ONVHO/301SH3A1H 0/3 S3111/I 17.0 1f108V A1Nf100 301SHAAIH NHA1SAM NI
4090174A1H
SNVH11V0
s;oafald Aemg61-1 ele;S ay; Japun pa;s11 Lllenp!Aipu1
sl;l;nq (40s-iAN) OV-ddOHS Aq papun; Aileiped sl;oafald
1169N0 V3 Jo; 6ulpun; dllS 1740Z aleJodiooul
o; pue 'L8l-Hbl 'oN;uawpuawV Jed '6ulpun; uo4elillgeya 1
wawaned ddOHS b40Z aleJodmoul o; asea191.1l4soo
'9lit l AA NI 9N3 OVWO HOA 03zllllfl 38 111M 01 6.Z09$ '103f0Hd
S11AAN38 SZWd OVWO - (f169N0 V3) (21301f10HS 301S1f101A-04 0NV HAC11110HS AOISNI
1A-04) SH101M OHVONV1S Ol SH301f10HS 30IS1f10 ONV 301SN1 ONIISIX3 30VHOd0
ONV 11VH11188VH NOVI AO lSAM 33111A1 Lb"4 Ol 0H SONIHdS NVW110 WOHA SANV1
NonaL 0Nf1081SAM ONV ON0081SV3 MAN 1onaiSN00 :1NOWf1V38 HVAN 09-HS NO
40Z0Z4A1H
SNVHI1V0
'dlld 940Z ay; ul sanssl klloedeo 6ulwweJ6ad
o; anp luessaoau Si Ll/940Z AA ul ld1S to 6ulwwei6ald
'dSd3 6wzipn '94/1740Z
AA ul sl uo1pni;suoo Jo; spun; IeJapal;o uogeNcIO 11.19lOZ
AA o; b4/E40Z AA wok I yd uoprulsuoo;o 6wwwei6aldaH
'(£b4b£/Zb417£V3) 09HS
Ol N01103NN00 3AV SllONN N2131SAM 3A01/4321 ONV '3AV S110NN N2131SAM NOI1VAH
'SdWVH 11X3 1V SN1 Xf1V 8M/93 10N1 `(3NV1AOH IONI SdWVH AHIN3) (SN1 Z) SdWV21
AH1NA d001 83/9M'9 (SN1 Z) SdWV21 A211N3'S lIXA 83/8M .1SN00 'SdWVH AAO/NO
01 MAN :ZHd .(E17417£/1174bEV3) S110NN N2131SAM 0110ANN00 dW31/M (H10 HOV3 SN1
E) 00 Nl 9 OH32i10d MAN '1SN00-4Hd 10f 04-1/09HS'3 HI 1188VH NOVf NM18 098S NO
9£9090ARi
SNV2il1V0
Z06090AI2i :01 &IN
Aelap alnpayos pue spun;
;o 6uiwweJ6cudab -s ea,, leluualpena dlld 940Z w;oafald maN
(01-V313AVS-01N30 - /VVH/ON3
HOd £l/Z4 AA NI L93 ONV Z4/44 AA NI l04$ :_1 1 01) NHOM 313HON00 0NV 30VNIV210
3C1010N1 S1NAW3A0HdW1 IVNOI1100V '03211noal SV H31100 ONV 82ino ONIC1010N1
11108VONf1OH Ol NOIIISNVH_L HOd SHANHOO 1NAOWOV 11V N301M '021 Nl A1NflOO
0NV 0A18 VS3WI1V0 AO N01103S2131NI 1V 1f108V0NnmJ 'lA 06lona1SN00 `(OA18
VS3W11V0 0/3 ,009 0104-1) SN1 Z Ol 4 1/10HA OH Nl A1Nf100 83 N301M - VSAWIIVO NI
Z04090A1H
VS3WI1V0
b4/£ 40Z AA Jo; pazuolool - s;oafald wei6ald shell leuollealoab
bl/£40Z AA gad s�eaA Ieluua�penO dad 9lOZ ul;oafald AAaN
dVW 1IV2113101H3A AVMHJIH dd0 V321V 3Hll l8 V AO ONIlN121d
CVV NOI11SOdW00 - 3H1A18 AO A1I0 3H1 HVAN A1Nf100 A01SHAAIH NHAISV3 NI
9020V4AIH
uollea na2l
pue sued to
;uawiJeda0 eluao;!IeO
uoseab alepd(1
91111
al pafad
Aoua6V
�60Z/56/Z6 :Ienoadde VMHd
b60Z;sn6ny
I, -oN;uawpuauv lewaod - dad S60Z
�1111.11
L 4 40 £ abed
Wd 90:Z - 940Z/94/4
xslx•6ol luawpuawy did 940Z
MI. '0N;Oafaid '4eP/6)1 Z29' lo;s!suoo s;3aueq
04 Wd Pue (ep/6>! g4g }o;s!suoo s;�}auaq 9•Z Old OVWO •sloafaid
�0l IIeO OVWO 440Z s,JdnO uaal dlld 940Z u!;oafad nnaN
(AVO/9H
942" SlId3N38 9'Z Wd)(94/94 Ad NI OVWO HO1VW 0101 d0 9L'Z9$) AlIA1103NN00
1V102I3WW00 Ol 1V11N301S38 31VI1110Vd 01 S1VR13121V A110 NO S3NV1 3>118 II SSV10
9480tiLAR1
ellayoeo0
8090'0N l0afad
(oua6u!;uo0 d1V 's-leaA !e!uualpenO dad 940Z u! afaid nnaN
—100HOS HOIH 113A3S0021'2 S1001-10S OIW Z38I1A1V21'2 S11-1913H 83AI8
'S1001-10S W313 VOV8VH'2'S>121Vd VSO8 `31VA1SV3 21V3N S3NV1 3>118 d0 'd'l 00t0I.
'2 9NId1HIS `S>IIVMSS080 'SN91S `31380N0011VHdSV '8311119'2 821f10 'AV1dS10
033dS 8VOV8 `1VN91S 01ddV81 V 11V1SN1 AVldS10 033dS 8VOV8'2 ONIX 037I1VNOIS
-9100HOS 31d111f1W 1V S121S-31VA1SV3 d0 A110 3H1 80d '00 301S83A18 N2131S3M N
917901744\18
eleAlse3 40 40
"alepdfl d8H 1740Z/Z0/40
-lad 94/94 Ad 01 q4/£4 Ad wail spun; M/810 6u!wwei60.1d921
"(6240099
'ON 300188) 1031'08d 3141 d0 301S ISV3 3HI ONO1V N1VM301S (=INV NVI03W 03SIV8
V d0 N0110f12i1SN00 3H1 9NICIMONl `0-linos 3H1 01 •08 Z3213d ONV H_LUON 3H1
01 VOV81S3 VIA) 390188 3H1 0/N Id 09Z Ol 300188 3H1 O/S ld 09£ 'X08ddV W08d
'(2110 V3 NI SNl £) SNl 9 Ol V W021d 80 WIVd 31V0 dO 9NIN301M :83A18 831VM311HM
31-1I 83A0 80 WIVd 31V0 - A311VA V113H0V00 3H1 NI AINf100 301S213A18 N2131SV3 NI
4 40460AI21
40 IeapayleO
"eL4# IS 6u4s!-1 oafad padna0
ti40Z '8 �agwa;daS pa;ep 6u!;s!I ddOHS b40Z _lad nnaN
NOI1V11118VH38
80/ONV 9N10Vd21f1S38 IN31A13AVd - £'2 Z S318V11d1A13X3 9Z4'£6 I8Vd 8d0 Ob
H11M 1N31SISN00 38V S103108d :3ONVN3INIVW AVMHOIH - W31SAS AVMHOIH 31V1S
£4SlAl8
SNV811V0
9# IS 6u!;s!1 afaid padna0
•1V
440Z `9Z Apr pa;ep 6u!ls!I ddOHS ti40Z gad;oafad nnaN
S213A011fld >1oan_ AON30831A13 'S1NWA8dW1
9NIIH91l 'Vfl 3H1 301SIf10 101 'OW30 ONI>I8VW 1NWAd `SN1OS2131N1 WIN!
S10f21d 1VN91S NI0S831NI 'S1V1\191S NVH1213H10 1SISSV 9NIIV83d0/S301A30
18IN0 OIddV2l1 `SINWA8dW1 2i01f10HS 'SON W31SAS 01V-03d-NON d3dVS `9NISS02l0
AMH/88 - £'2Z S318V11dW3X3 9Z 4'£6 18Vd 8d0 017 /M 1N31SISN00 38V S1031-021d
WV8908d 1111180A ddOHS - S1N3W3A08d1AlI A13dVS 80d S1031‘021d 03d11089
04S1A18
SNV2111V0
£# IS 6u!;s!l;oafad padno��
•1V
VLOZ '9Z �Inf pa;ep 6u!;s!I ddOHS ti40Z _lad nnaN
SU3A011f1d Nonal A0N392131/13 'S1NWA8dWl
ON11H911 'Vfl 3H1 301s1f10101 'OW30 W 9N1>INVINWAd 'SN10S2131N1 IAONI
S10f21d 1VN91S N10S831N1 `S1VN91S NVH1 b3H101SISSV 9NIIV83d0/S301A30
1211N0 OIddV211 'S1NWA8dWl 2101f1OHS 'saa W31SAS OIV-03d-NON 213dVS '9NISS080
AMH/88 - £'2Z S318V11d1A13X3 9Z4'E618Vd 8d0 Ob /M 1N31SISN00 321V S103f08d
=1/51V219021d S3IVONVW ddOHS - S1N31A13A021dW1 A13dVS 80d S1031'021d 03df1080
60S1A121
SNV8l1V0
6# IS 6u!;s!l;oafad padnai�
ti40Z `9Z llnf pa;ep 6u!;s!I ddOHS bIOZ gad }oafad rnaN
(S1N3WW00 NI "1N00 NOIld180S30) 'NIOS2131N1 IAONI 1V SiO3f021d
1VN91S N1OS831N1 'S1VN91S NVH183H10 30NV1SISSV 9NIIVU3d0/S301A30
10211N00 0ldd`d211 `S1NWA8dW1 acnn0HS 'S021 W31SAS OIV-03d-NON
83dVS '9NISS080 AMH/88 - £'2Z S318V11dW3X3 9Z4'£618Vd 21d0 OV /M 1N31SISN00
38V S103f021d :1A1V8O021d 80NIW - N011V11118VH321 210/0NV 9NI0Vd8f1S3211N31A13AVd
'S1N31A13A08dW183011101AS `SIN31A13A021dWI 113dVS 80d S103f021d 03df1080
80S1Al2l
SNV811V0
' 4# IS 6u!;sn oafad padnaie
'1740Z `9Z R!nf pa;ep 6w4s11 ddOHS ti40Z.10d;oafad maN
"(S3NV1 13AV811VN011100V ON) S300188 9N110f181SN0038 80 S1N31A13AVd M088VN
9NIN301M - Z 318V11dW3X3 9ZVE6 21d0 Ob/M 1N31SISN00 38V S103f08d WV8008d
ddOHS - N0110f181SNO038 ONV NOI1V11118VH321 390188 80d SI031'021d 03d11080
90S1AI8
SNV811V0
uoseau a;epdn
allli
al loafold
foue6y
ti 60Z/9 6/Z 6 :leno�dde b'MHd
" ,
P60Z;sn6nv
o uaw ua ew�o
4' N3 p uryl d-dud560Z
.;•on
0 Od
2015 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1
August 2014
CD
itve,/_ Garay lianwstoiroh tam
FHWA approval: 12/15/2014
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Coachella
RIV140842
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF COACHELLA - ATP IMPOVEMENTS
CYCLE 1: ADD 7 MI. OF CLASS II BIKE LANES & CLASS III BIKEWAYS W/SHARROWS,
APSHALT BIKE PATH, PED XING, & CONSTRUCTION OF 2 MI. OF SIDEWALKS AT
DIFFERENT LOCATIONS & LANDSCAPED MEDIANS ALONG AVE 50 & AVE 52 FROM
WESTERN CITY LIMITS TO CV LINK. ($11.47 OF TC IN FY14/15 & $190.86 OF TC IN FY 15/16)
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. RCTC portion of
SCAG/MPO amount of ATP funding. DAC or Disadvantage
Communities do not need required 11.47% local match, per ATP
guidelines. Project No. 0571
ATP MPO Funding consists of $100 state funds and $1,664 of
federal funds. TC used for total in case city of Coachella utilizes
federal funds for ENG phase.
CVAG
RIV131005
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR CVAG: CONSTRUCT IN PHASES A NEW 50 MILE
BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND LOW SPEED ELECTRICAL VEHICLE PATH FROM CITY OF
DESERT HOT SPRINGS TO THE SALTON SEA ROUGHLY ALONG WHITEWATER RIVER. PH 1
WILL CONSTRUCT LINK FROM PALM SPRINGS TO COACHELLA. FUTURE PHASES WILL
CONSTRUCT LINK FROM DESERT HOT SPRINGS TO PALM SPRINGS AND COACHELLA TO
THE SALTON SEA.
Cost Increase from $65,041 to $99,359 due to revision in latest
Engineer's estimate. Environmental Date pushed out from
10/1/2015 to 6/30/2017. New funding coming from Statewide pot
of ATP program. DAC or Disadvantage Communities do not need
required 11.47% local match, per ATP guidelines. Project No.
0507.
CVAG
RIV140820
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR CVAG: REGIONAL SIGNAL SYCHRONIZATION
PROGRAM THROUGH THE COACHELLA VALLEY INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SIGNAL
UPGRADES, COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE.
New project in 2015 FTIP from CVAG's 2014 CMAQ Call for
Projects. CMAQ PM 2.5 and PM 10 benefits will be assessed per
project in PA&ED.
Indio
RIV111202
IN THE CITY OF INDIO - AVE 44 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT: REPLACE EXISTING AVENUE 44
TWO LANE LOW WATER CROSSING OVER THE COACHELLA VALLEY STORMWATER
CHANNEL WITH A FOUR LANE BRIDGE (BRIDGE NO. OOL0056), INCLUDING 6 FT SIDEWALK
ON EACH SIDE OF THE BRIDGE.
Reprogramming of funds into future years, per 04/02/2014 HBP
Update.
ndio
RIV140819
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF INDIO - FULLY PAVE ABOUT ONE MILE
OF UNPAVED CITY ROADS ALONG (4) RESIDENTIAL STREETS IN INDIO, NORTH OF
INTERSTATE 10. STREETS TO BE REPAVED ARE: RANCHO LOS CERRITOS DR; PRIMROSE
LANE; GALINDO CT; AND SABRINA CT (PM 2.5 BENEFITS 17.92 KG/DAY)
New project in 2015 FTIP from CVAG's 2014 CMAQ Call for
projects. CMAQ PM 2.5 benefits consist of 17.92 kg/day and PM
10 benefits consist of 81.28 kg/day. Project No. 1002
Indio
RIV140848
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF INDIO — ANDREW JACKSON ELEM PED
IMPROVEMENTS: ON TEN STREETS WITHIN THE ANDREW JACKSON ELEM SCHOOL
COMMUNITY, INSTALL SIDEWALKS, UPGRADE PED ACCESS RAMPS AND DRIVEWAY
APPROACHES, THREE ENHANCED CROSSWALKS, AND TWO SPEED FEEDBACK SIGNS.
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. ATP portion of
Statewide funding. DAC or Disadvantage Communities do not
need required 11.47% local match, per ATP guidelines. Project
No. 0509
Moreno Valley
RIV140849
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO. IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY — CITYWIDE SRTS PED
FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS: INSTALL 2,840 FT. OF SIDEWALK GAP CLOSURES, CURBS,
GUTTERS, STREET LIGHTS, ADA RAMPS, & STREET WIDENING ON DRACAEA AVE,
EUCALYPTUS AVE, IRONWOOD AVE, KITCHING ST, SANDY GLADE AVE, AND ELSWORTH
ST; NON -INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDES BIKE/PED SAFETY CAMPAIGN & BIKE SAFETY
CLASSES.
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. ATP portion of
Statewide funding. DAC or Disadvantage Communities do not
need required 11.47% local match, per ATP guidelines. Project
No. 0512
PALM SPRINGS
RIV090405
IN THE CITY OF PALM SPRINGS: REPLACE EXISTING 4-LANE LOW WATER CROSSING ON
VISTA CHINO AT WHITEWATER RIVER WITH A NEW 4-LANE BRIDGE - BRIDGE NO. OOL0052.
Reprogramming of funds into future years, per 04/02/2014 HBP
Update.
2015 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1/15/2015 - 2:05 PM
Page 4 of 17
L L 10 s 86ed
Wd 90:Z - 9 LOZ/96/ L
xslx601;uai.upuawV dlld 91.0Z
600E "oN;oafad !ep/6�{ ZZ0•6 do;slsuoo s;}auaq 01
Wd pue step/631 LbE�E }o;slsuoo s;l}auaq 9"Z Wd OVINO "s;oafad
�01 IIeO OVWO bLOZ s,OyAO wa} dlld 940Z ul;oafad mEN
(AVO/0>I LbE'E N3E1 9 Z Old) AM WVI211W Ol 210 3d0H SOS 1/1021d S/N
210 3210HS HVNIO 9N01V'8 210 3d0H SOS Ol 021 SOWVIV SO1 W021d a21 NOWV2i ONO1V
JNION3d ONUS ldb d0'd•l 8Lb'9L 11V1SNl 8'1f1ON23f11 Sf188 dWV21 dVOIONVH'2i311(10
313210N00 31V001321'8 3AOW32i'd001
1VNOIS 30V1d321'310d 1VNOIS 31V001321'21311f10'8 82:1 10'8 0NV1SI d01-10)1210d'
121 3321d 10M1SN00-39V211W OHONV21 d0 A110 2i0d 00 301S2i3A121 1‘12131SV3 NI
91.80171.Aw
a6emi oyouea
OLOL "oN pafad •Rep/6)1 60'9 }o;slsuoo swauaq
0L Wd Pue Aep/6)1 9Z•Z }o;slsuoo s;gauaq 9•Z Wd °VINO "s;oafad
ao} IIEO OVWO bLOZ 9.0VA0 wou dlld 9LOZ ul;oafad mEN
(AV0/ON 9Z•Z SlId3N38 9'Z Old)
(S311W 9Z•0) 1S3M 3H1 Ol 'ld OWL 2i0 3d0H 808 W021d `S/N '210 3210HS HVNIO'8 (S311W
09'0) 210 3210HS HVNIO Ol 101 ONIN21Vd MO1d213A0 ONISVO 31N311V0 Vf10V d0 0N3
H1f10S 3H1 W021d 'S/M '210 3d0H 808 ONO1V ONION3d ONVS H01H "ld anod d0 "d•l
080`L L d0 N011V11V1SN1-30V211W OHONV21 d0 A110 3H1210d OO 301S213AW N2i31SV3 NI
17L80171.A121
a6e-1l1A1 01-loue21
IleJl uogeaoa2l
91:90 'oN
;oafad •saullapin6 d1y gad 'yo;ew pool %Lb L L paJlnbaa paau
;ou op sal;lunwwoO a6e;uenpesl0 Jo OVO "6ulpun} aplma;e;S
}o uopod dub' 'saeaA leluuaJpen0 dlld 91.0Z ul;oafad mEN
:30N3d OAd 11`, 1 111dS (=INV 30N3d NNll NIVHO `30VNOIS `N011V012i2il
ONIdVOSONVI S30f1lONl `S111N11 A110 1S3MS NI >1212 Vd 1VN01031 NVIENN 1V 1IV211
HAAN OINIOVf NVS Ol S11WI1 A110 N213H1210N W021d NIV210 W2301S A311VA SI21213d Ol
1311V21Vd 1IV2113Sf1-Il1f1W 313210N00 d0 S311W Z£'b 301M 1d-9L M3N :11V21113NNVHO
NIV210 W2101S A311VA SR3213d — S12:3213d d0 A110 3H1 NI "00 301S213A121 N2131S3M NI
L980PLA121
suJad
91.90 'oN
;oafad "saullapin6 d1b' gad 'yo;ew 1e001 %Lb:L L pailnbal paau
;ou op sal;lunwwoo a6e;uenpesl0 Jo OW] "6ulpun} ap!meWTS
}o uo4Jod cum 'sJeaA leluuaJpen0 dill 9 LOZ ul Toafad MaN
MI V13taanW'8
NOS11M M/8 1S 31V0 NO N1VM301S M3N `S021 0A3f1N'8 V1312 aniN 1V 1VNOIS OIddV211
'13NNV1-10 10211N00 0001d Z13W 213A0 3001218 301M ,OL `021 0A3f1N d0 H1210N ,000E
'8 3AV OINIOVf NVS M/8 SN011032110 1-1108 NI S3NV1 3)119 II SSV10 /M 02i V1312aaniN
d0 301S-M NO 21311f10'8 82:Ino 'SdV0 N1VM301S d0 311W 0' L 11V1SNI S1N3W3A021dW1
03d 021 V13121antru — S12:1213d d0 A110 3H1 NI '00 301S213Al2:1 1‘12131S3M NI
098017LA121
swag
weld aoue;sissy 6ul;eladp b
algel d121S 9L-bLOZA3 panadde woq dlld 9LOZ ul;oatad mEN:AON3JV
(NL$ - L LE9) '9 LAd 210d 301A213S
11SNV211V21Vd 0NV 3inoa 03XId 210d 3ONVISISSV
0N11V213d0 lISNV211 30213A OIVd 210d A1Nf100 301S213AR1 N2131SV3 NI
E090171:A1U
AON3OV
11SNV211 A311VA
30213A OIVd
LLOL oN Toaaad /IeP/6>I Lb0 }o;slsuoo queued
01. Old Pue Aep/6)1 Epp' }o;slsuoo s;4auaq 9�Z Wd °VINO "s;oafad
�o} peO OVWO bLOZ s,JVAO wall dlld 9LOZ ul oafad mEN-MA
(AV0/O>i£b' 'N38 9'ZWd) 211 A211f1V
Ol AM 3S12iNf1S LAMA V13(10S3 VIA'2 'AMHd 3SMNf1S 01 HO 8f11O 13f10OV21
W02id 210 NOANVO NVI0N1 'AM 3SI21Nf1S Ol 210 NOANVO NVIONI W021d 210 l3VdV21 NVS
0021V138 Ol 210 NOANVO AV2121f1W W021d 210 NOANVO W1Vd'S '021 NOWV21 013AV
H117E W021A 021 AlSS0d0 ONO1V :SIS JNIMOIIOd 3H1 ONO1V SNl 3)118 III SSV10'2 II
SSV10 "IW 9'61011211SNOO-SON121dS W1Vd d0 A110 3H1210d OO 301S213Ald 1\12131SV3 NI
81.8017LA12i
SON121dS W1Vd
gLOL oN;oafad pep/6)1 800 }o;slsuoo s; auaq 0L Wd PUe
AeP/6)I L00' 1o;slsuoo s;l}auaq g•Z Wd OVWO s;oafad Jo} IIeO
OVWO PLOZ s,OVAO panoJdde A1;uaoaJ gad a6ueyO uogduosa0
.(JNISV32i0N1 Al10VdVO-NON) 1IV211 Aainv 3N30 0Nf108 1-11210N NO 13NOOd Nani
1d31 0N0O3S 00V :ONIHO V1SIA 1V (11V211 A2l111V 3N30) L 1.1. AMH NO SON121dS WIVd NI
100L£LAI21
SJN12idS Wlt/d
'a;epol1 d8H 171.0Z/Z0/170
gad sJeaA aJn;n} op spun}}o 6ulwweJ6adab pue aseaJoap;so0
7.21VSS303N SV
S32if1SV3W2131Nf10O 21f100S 0NV 11d02113U OIWSI3S ONI0f11ONl '(L8Z0099 'ON 3001218)
30012:38 213Al2:1 2131VM311HM 3H1 AO 1N3W30V1da21/JNIN301M 3H1 ONICIMIONl "0A18
f1V0NVl'2 2i0 A321 Slfll NVS N33M138 (21I0 V3 NI SN1-E) 1V1213121V N1-9 V Ol 1V12:33121V
N1-17 V W021A '021 NOWV21 AO ONIN30IM •0A18 nvaNV1'8 210 A321 Slfll NVS N33M138
ONIN301M '021 NOWV21 - SON12:1dS 1N1Vd d0 A113 3H1 NI A311VA V113H0V00 3H1 NI
bZLOL LARi
SONI21dS Wl dd
uosea2l a;epdn
al;l1
al;oafad
Aoua6V
1760Z/91./Z 6 :Ienoaaae yMHd
WNW am
1740Z len6ny
•oN ;ueuipuewy leuuod - dlld S 1.0Z
2015 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1
August 2014
_
a..wew c,ro ,, ,w, t.
FHWA approval: 12/15/2014
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
RCTC
RIV130401
THROUGHOUT WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT
RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR
PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING
AND/OR REHABILITATION.
Reprogramming of funds per project milestone updates. Funds
reprogrammed from FY 13/14 and FY 14/15 to FY 16/17. May
utilize EPSP
Grouped Project Listing SI # 17(d)
RCTC
RIV130402
THROUGHOUT EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY - GROUPED PROJECTS FOR PAVEMENT
RESURFACING AND/OR REHABILITATION - PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR
PART 93.126 EXEMPT TABLES 2 AND TABLE 3 CATEGORIES - PAVEMENT RESURFACING
AND/OR REHABILITATION.
New Project in the 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Yrs. Cost decrease
from $5,404 to $5,110 per commission action and latest
engineer's estimate.
Reprogramming of funds and Schedule delay per project
milestone updates and programming capacity
Grouped Project Listing SI # 17(d)
RCTC
RIV140202
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR CAR -A -VAN TRANSIT: MOBILITY MANAGEMENT TO
ENHANCE TRANSPORTATION DELIVERY SERVICES
FOR CAR-A-VAN'S HOPE BUS FROM JARC.
New Project in 2015 FTIP from approved JARC/New Freedom
Cycle 7 project list.
RCTC
RIV140857
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RCTC IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY— SRTS
TROTH ST: ON EAST AND WEST SIDES OF TROTH ST B/W 58TH ST & JURUPA RD, INSTALL
3,650 FT. OF SIDEWALK EXTENSION, CURB & GUTTER, ADA-COMPLIANT RAMPING,
CROSSWALK AT TROTH ST & 56TH ST W/ SOLAR LED FLASHERS AND PED PUSH
BUTTONS, AND MODIFIED ON -STREET PARKING TO CREATE SCHOOL PICK-UP/DROP-OFF
ZONE.
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. ATP portion of
Statewide funding. DAC or Disadvantage Communities do not
need required 11.47% local match, per ATP guidelines. Project
No. 0510
RCTC
RIV140858
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO. FOR RCTC IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY — PYRITE ST
SRTS: INSTALL 2,625-FT OF SIDEWALK ON PYRITE ST B/W GALENA ST & MISSION BLVD
WITH A ROAD DIET, WITH ADA RAMPING, ENHANCED CROSSWALK AT PYRITE ST &
CASSIDY CIRCLE W/ SOLAR LED FLASHERS AND PED PUSH BUTTONS, MODIFIED ON-
STREET PARKING FOR PICK-UP/DROP-OFF ZONES.
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. ATP portion of
Statewide funding. DAC or Disadvantage Communities do not
need required 11.47% local match, per ATP guidelines. Project
No. 0511
Riverside County
RIV111003
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY - MARKET STREET
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT: REPLACE THE EXISTING TWO LANE (ONE LANE IN EACH
DIRECTION) MARKET STREET BRIDGE OVER THE SANTA ANA RIVER, 0.4 MILES
NORTHWEST OF SR60 WITH A FOUR LANE (TWO LANES IN EACH DIRECTION) BRIDGE.
BRIDGE NO. 56C0024
Reprogramming of R/W funds from FY 15/16 to FY 16/17 per
04/02/2014 HBP Update.
Riverside County
RIV121204
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF NORCO - ON HAMNER AVE OVER SANTA
ANA RIVER .5 MILES N/O OF SIXTH STREET, REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 6 LANE
BRIDGE (BRIDGE N0.56C0446).
Reprogramming of Eng funds from FY 13/14 to FY 17/18 per
04/02/2014 HBP Update. New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial
Years
Riverside County
RIV140401
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY NEAR THE CITY OF MENIFEE - ON NUEVO ROAD,
REPLACE 2 LANE BRIDGE WITH A 4 LANE BRIDGE OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER 1.2 MILES
W/O LAKEVIEW AVENUE. (BRIDGE NO. 56C0004).
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years per HBP listing
4/2/2014 update.
Bridge No. 56C0004
2015 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1 /15/2015 - 2:05 PM
Page 6 of 17
CD
2015 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1 _':
wwns6.Ca.m,L (Woes.
August 2014
FHWA approval: 12/15/2014
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Riverside County
RIV140838
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO. FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE IN MEAD VALLEY-CLARK ST
S/W & INTERSECTION SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS: ON EASTSIDE OF CLARK ST B/W RIDER
STAND CAJALCO RD, CONSTRUCT APPROX. 2,000 L.F. OF CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CURB &
GUTTER, PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS, NEW CURB RAMPS MEETING LATEST ADA REQS,
DRIVEWAY APPROACHES, SIGNS, MARKINGS, & OTHER INCIDENTAL ITEMS TO IMPROVE
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY.
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. RCTC portion of
SCAG/MPO amount of ATP funding. DAC or Disadvantage
Communities do not need required 11.47% local match, per ATP
guidelines. Project No. 0527
Riverside County
RIV140839
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE CO. FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE NEAR DHS-AVENIDA
RAMBLA S/W SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS: ON AVENIDA RAMBLA B/W BUBBLING WELLS
ELEM SCHOOL AND CAMINO AVENTURA AND NORTHSIDE OF CAMINO CAMPESINO B/W
AVENIDA RAMBLA AND BUBBLING WELLS RD, CONSTRUCT APPROX. 3,200 L.F. OF
SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS, CURB RAMPS, DRIVEWAY APPROACHES,
SIGNS, MARKINGS, & OTHER INCIDENTAL ITEMS.
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. RCTC portion of
SCAG/MPO amount of ATP funding. DAC or Disadvantage
Communities do not need required 11.47% local match, per ATP
guidelines. Project No. 0525
Riverside County
RIV140840
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE CO. FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE IN MECCA -GRAPEFRUIT
BLVD/4TH ST PED & RDWY SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS: ON W/S OF GRAPEFRUIT BLVD BNV
4TH ST & 3,000 FT SOUTH OF 66TH AVE, CONSTRUCT APPROX. 3,500 L.F. OF ASPHALT
CONCRETE WALKWAY & 250 L.F. OF CONCRETE S/W, CURB & GUTTER, ADA CURB
UPGRADES & WIDENING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS. ($49.32 OF TC IN FY14/15 &
$214.49 OF TC IN FY15/16).
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. RCTC portion of
SCAG/MPO amount of ATP funding. DAC or Disadvantage
Communities do not need required 11.47% local match, per ATP
guidelines. Project No. 0530
Riverside County
RIV140846
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE IN NUEVO-LAKEVIEW
AVE S/W SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS: ON LAKEVIEW AVE B/W 10TH ST AND 100-FT NORTH
OF 11TH ST, INSTALL 2,600 L.F. OF CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER,
PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS, ADA COMPLIANT CURB RAMPS, DRIVEWAY APPROACHES,
SIGNS AND MARKINGS.
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. ATP Contingency
project No. 0528
Riverside County
RIV140847
IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE IN MECCA - MECCA
SIDEWALK & ROADWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS: INSTALL 4,200 L.F. OF CONCRETE
SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER, PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS, CURB RAMPS, DRIVEWAY
APPROACHES, SIGNS AND MARKERS ALONG SIXTH ST., DALE KILER RD., & BROWN ST
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. ATP Contingency
Project No. 0526
Riverside County
RIV140853
IN RIV CO FOR CO'S DPH-PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WTH 40 CFR PART 93.126 EXEMPT
TABLES 2&TABLE 3 CAT -SPECIFIC ACTIVITIES WHICH DO NOT INVOLVE OR LEAD TO
CON,SUCH AS: PLAN &TECH STUDIES,GRANTS FOR TRAINING&RESEARCH
PROGRAMS,PLAN ACTIVITES CONDUCTED PUR TO TITLES 23 & 49 USC,FED-AID SYSTEMS
REV,ENG TO ASSESS SOCIAL,ECONOMICAENVIRONMENTAL AFFECTS OF THE
PROPOSED ACTION OR ALTERNATIVE TO THAT ACTION
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. ATP portion of
Statewide funding. DAC or Disadvantage Communities do not
need required 11.47% local match, per ATP guidelines. Project
No's. 0768, 0770 and 0769
Group Project Listing S.I. # 46
RIVERSIDE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV041030
IN THE CITY OF HEMET - CONSTRUCT NEW HEMET TRANSIT CENTER (WITH
APPROXIMATELY 4 BUS BAYS) - IN THE VICINITY OF STATE STREET AND DEVONSHIRE
AVENUE NEAR THE FUTURE COURTHOUSE LOCATION (5309c FY 04 + 05 EARMARKS).
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years.
Revised project location (Kirby St. between Devonshire Ave. and
W. Latham Ave.) in the City of Hemet to move project forward.
RIVERSIDE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV140823
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA: OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FIXED ROUTE
AND PARATRANSIT OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR
FY 2014/15 (FTA 5307 FY14) (UZA: HEMET)
New Project in 2015 FTIP from approved FY2014-15 SRTP Table
4 Operating Assistance Plan -
2015 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1/15/2015 - 2:05 PM
Page 7 of 17
L 40 9 abed
W d 90: Z - S 1.0Z/914
xslx601;uawpuewV dlld SLOZ
(Ol-9L#) 171VnswolanV
ape' d12iS 9L gLOZAd Panadde wall dlld 9LOZ ul;oafad nnaN
'OIgL£$ - SU VZN (L0E9 gLAd) '321VM1dOS OW 'S31dOO '1N31Ald111O3
'S213A213S `S2131NIUd 'S2131nd1NOO dO 3SVHO21nd 3H1 Ol a311W11
10N Ina ONICIMONI SW3ISAS NOLLVMOdNl V1271 21Od A1NnOO 301S213A121 N2131S3M NI
q£80gLn12}
AON3OV
lISNV2il 3aIS213AR1
'(6-9 L#;oafad) q
ape d121S 91.171•OZAd Panadde wall dlld 910Z ul;oafad maN
()199Z$ - SU VZ(1)
(LO£9 gLAd) '31321ONOO aNV '101 ONIN21Vd 'OVAH 'ONIIH011 '1VO1211O313 'ON111Nnld
'1NIVd 'ON121OO1d 'a21n1INund of a311W11 10N ln8 ONIan1ONl VNO21OO °NV '131N3H
'3aIS213A1U NI 3ONVN3INIVW A111I0Vd :V121 U0d AlNnOO 301S213A121 N2131S3M NI
££807LAR1
AON3OV
11SNV2113aIa213A121
:(9-9L4;oafad) q
algel d121S 9L-17IOZAd Panadde wall dlld 9LOZ ui;oafad maN
'(>16L$ -1W :VZn) (L0E9 gLAd) "SNOW' ONVH aNV
'3NV21O 318V121Od 'ONINIVU1210J S3O1A3a A11118O0.1 `ldil SUOSSIOS 'S21OSS321dWO0
21IV dOHS '2131V3H dOHS AaOEI Ol 0311W11
10N ins ONIGMONI 1N31NdInO3 1210ddflS V121 21od A1Nn0O 301s213AIU 142131S3M NI
Z£80glAl2i
AON3OV
11SNVU1301 13A1U
'(L-9 L#;oafad) 17
awl dDAS 91171.0ZAd Pana(1de wall dlld 9L0Z u! oafad maN
(NZVZ$ -1lN VZn) (L0£9 gLAd)
'S32111 sn8 ONISV31 dO 1SOO 1V1IdV0 V121 UOd AlNf1OO 3aISH3A121 N2131S3M NI
'(>1017$ - 13W3H ')108$ - lIN :Val) (2_O£9 gLAd) 'SS3O0V
VaV aNV A13dVS ONV A1R1nO3S 3ONVHN3 Ol ONIIHOII aNV '3OVNOIS 'SNSOIN
'S3HON38 aNV al3113HS sn8 Ol 0311Wi11ON
ln8 ONICIMONI S1N31A13ONVHN3 11SNV211 V121 2iOd AlNGOO 301S213A121 N2131S3M NI
L£80glAl2i
0£80g1AR1
AON3OV
lISNVU13Glal3A121
AON3OV
11SNVU1301a13A121
"(9-91.#;oafad) q
algel d121S 91.-171.0ZAd Panadde wall dlld 91.OZ u! oafad maN
(9 9l#;oafad) 17-1OVU1NOO
algel d121S 9L gLOZAd Panadde wog} dlld 9LOZ ul oafad n�aN.A11O32110
(NLLL'Z$ - SU =VZn) (LO£9 ql) d) '3d111nd3Sn 2113H1131A1 3AVH 1VH1 S3sn8 a31VU3d0
(INV S3HnllVd a3SV321ON1 ONION31213dX3 321V 1VH1 S3sn8 a31V213dO
NO S3XO832JVd dO 1N3W1 21 3OV1d3U :V12Od AlNnOO 3a1a213A121 N2131S3M NI
6Z90gLA121
AON3OV
lISNV2113aIS213A121
(q SL#;oafad) 17-1W
algel d121S 9l-gLOZAd Panadde wog} dlld 9 LOZ ul;oafad nnaN
()1889$
YZn) (LO£917LAd) '3d11 1nd3Sn 2113H113W 3AVH 1VHl SH0n2111U0ddnS 3NIN
aNV SUVO 121OddnS N31 JO 1N3W3OVlda21 V1U 21od AlNf1OO 3alai3A121 N2131S3M NI
8Z80g1A121
AON3OV
lISNV2113aIS213A121
'(Z-914;oafad) 17
elgel d121S 9L-17LOZAd Panadde wall dlld 91LOZ ui;oafad nnaN
(>11709 L$ - SU :VZn) (LO£9 gLAd) '3d11 3O1A213S 2113H1 dO aN3 3H1 a3HOV321 3AVH 1VH1
S3sn8 11SNV211VUVd 9Z dO 1N31A13OV1d321 V121 210J AlNnOO 3aIS213A121 N2131S3M NI
9Z80gLAl2J
AON3OV
11SNV211301S213A121
'(1.-91.#;oafad) q
awl d121S 91.-171.OZAd Panadde wall dlld 9LOZ ui;oafad maN
()i£LO'Z$ -13W3H
VZn) (LO£9 17LAd) '3O1A213S 31no21-a3Xld O31V213dO-1OV211NO0 NO 3Sn UOd S3sn8
a3ZIS-a1W 1N3W3OV1d32i anod aNV S3sn8 A311OU1
1N3W3OV1d32i 1HOI3 dO 3SVHOUIld :V121 21Od A1N11OO 3aIS213A1U N2131S3M NI
9Z80gLAR1
AON3OV
11SNV2i13a1S213Al2i
weld aoue;sissy 6ui;e�adp 17LO£9)
algel d12iS 9L-gLOZAd Panadde wog} dlld 9LOZ ul;oafad maN1V11dV0
(>1000'n - 213A0AUHV0
(>1009'n -11N ')1gg9`9$ - al '�991.$ - V1 :Val) (LO£9 gLAd) 'ON11OV211NOO dO 1SOO
ONV 3ONVN3INIVW 3A11V1N3A3Ud :V12I UOd A1NGOO 3a1S213A121 N2131S3M NI
gZ80gLAR1
AON3OV
lISNV2113aIS213Al2i
uoseab a;epdn
eipi
of;oafad
Aoua6y
V 6OZ/9 6/Z 6 lenoidde vAANA
176OZ;sn6nV
4.1,..°'""""°"°'`"om)T '"a o uaua uaw ew�o
—_...,min 4' N� P v I d- dlld 96OZ
2015 FTIP - Formal Amendment No. 1'""`
August 2014
CD
`
FHWA approval: 12/15/2014
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
RIVERSIDE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV151211
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA: IMPLEMENTATION OF LIMITED -STOP SERVICE ALONG
ROUTE 1 SERVICE AREA DURING
WEEKDAY PEAK COMMUTE PERIODS ALONG UNIVERSITY AND MAGNOLIA AVENUES
(RIVERSIDE/CORONA CORRIDOR). SERVICE WILL BE
BETWEEN UCR AND CORONA. THIS INCLUDES PURCHASE OF 14 NEW BUSES (40 FT) AND OPERATING
ASSISTANCE FOR THE FIRST THREE
TO FIVE YEARS OF SERVICE. (CMAQ - $9,212K)
Minor change to the project description extending the service from
Galleria to Corona (implementing Ph I and II concurrently) and
opting for the new CMAQ guidance that allows operating
p g p g
assistance for start up projects up to five years.
RIVERSIDE, CITY OF
RIV140802
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE: CAPITALIZED
PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE. (FY14 5307 - $320K) (UZA: RS)
New Project in 2015 FTIP from approved FY2014-15 SRTP Table
4 Operating Assistance Plan.
RIVERSIDE, CITY OF
RIV140836
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE - CAPITAL LEASE OF
OFFICE SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (FY14 5307 - $10K) (UZA:
RS)
New Project in 2015 FTIP from approved FY2014-15 SRTP Table
4 (Project #15-02).
RIVERSIDE, CITY OF
RIV140841
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR CITY OF RIVERSIDE-IOWA AVE & MLK BLVD BIKE
IMPROVEMENTS: CONSTRUCT 0.8 MI 10 FT WIDE TWO DIR MULTI -USE PATH ON N.SIDE OF
MLK BLVD BAN CANYON CREST DR & CHICAGO AVE & WIDENING IOWA AVE B/W MLK
BLVD & EVERTON PL INCLUDES GRADING, ASPHALT PAVING, SIGNS, & RESTRIPING &
INSTALL 6 FT CLASS II BIKE LNS FOR 0.8 MI WITH 2 FT BUFFERS
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. RCTC portion of
SCAG/MPO amount of ATP funding. DAC or Disadvantage
Communities do not need required 11.47% local match, per ATP
guidelines. Project No. 0517
RIVERSIDE, CITY OF
RIV140843
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE-WELLS/ARLANZA SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENTS: INSTALL ADA RAMPS, DRIVEWAY APPROACHES & 32,730 SQ FT OF
SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE OF FIVE STREETS (CHALLEN AVE, IVANHOE AVE, KENT AVE,
RUTLAND AVE, BABB AVE) SURROUNDING WELLS MIDDLE SCHOOL AND ARLANZA
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. ($204.40 OF TC USED IN FY15/16 TO MATCH ATP IN CON)
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. RCTC portion of
SCAG/MPO amount of ATP funding. DAC or Disadvantage
Communities do not need required 11.47% local match, per ATP
guidelines. Project No. 0521
RIVERSIDE, CITY OF
RIV140844
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO. IN THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE - NORTE VISTA SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENTS: INSTALL ADA RAMPS, DRIVEWAY APPROACHES & 94,200 SQ.FT. OF
SIDEWALK ON ONE SIDE OF FOUR STREETS (GAYLORD ST, JONES AVE, CHADBOURNE
AVE, BUSHNELL AVE) NEAR NORTE VISTA HIGH SCHOOL, ROSEMARY KENNEDY
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, AND TWINHILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. RCTC portion of
SCAG/MPO amount of ATP funding. DAC or Disadvantage
Communities do not need required 11.47% local match, per ATP
guidelines. Project No. 0522
RIVERSIDE, CITY OF
RIV140852
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO. IN THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE — DOWNTOWN & ADJOINING
AREAS BICYCLE AND PED IMPROVEMENTS: 17 MILES OF BIKE LANES, 2,500 FT. OF
CONNECTING SIDEWALKS, BIKE STATION AT METROLINK, CONNECTIVITY MAP KIOSKS,
TWO NEW HAWK SIGNALS, BIKE STAGING AREA, BIKE SHARE TERMINAL, BIKE CORRALS,
BIKE BLVD, PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS, WALKING PATH, ALL -WAY STOP CROSSWALK & NEW
SIDEWALK.
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. ATP portion of
Statewide funding. DAC or Disadvantage Communities do not
need required 11.47% local match, per ATP guidelines. Project
No. 0519
San Jacinto
RIV140856
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO. IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO — SAFE & ACTIVE SAN JACINTO
SRTS: INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDES 33,275 SQ. FT. OF NEW SIDEWALK, 5,215 SQ. FT. OF
EXISTING SIDEWALK UPGRADES, 52,800 SQ. FT. OF BIKE TRAILS WITHIN WALKING
DISTANCE TO SCHOOLS; NON -INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDES PED/BIKE SAFETY
EDUCAITON, SRTS WORKSHOPS, DEVELOPMENT OF SRTS PLANS FOR EACH SCHOOL,
AND OUTREACH.
New project in 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years. ATP portion of
Statewide funding. DAC or Disadvantage Communities do not
need required 11.47% local match, per ATP guidelines. Project
No. 0532
2015 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
1/15/2015 - 2:05 PM
Page 9 of 17
L L 40 0 L e6ed
Wd 50:Z - 91.OZ/9L/1.
xspc601;uewpuawy dlld 9LOZ
(ZL g L# loafad) g
algal d121S 91 4LOZAd panadde wail dlld g LOZ w;aafad MaN
(SdOONI
Val) (>1004$ - LO£9 4LAd) "1OO11N3W3OVNVIN
13SSV M3N V dO 3SVHO21fld A0N3OV 11SNV2113NI1Nf1S HOd A311VA V113HOVO0 NI
1.120171AR1
AON3OV
lISNV2113NI1Nf1S
•(8-gl#loafer a e ue Data
d) g Iq 1 p (6 gl# 1 d) 4
elgel d121S 91.-4LOZAd panadde wail dlld gLOZ ulloafad MaN
(SdOONI :Val)
(N00£$ - LO£9 4LAd '>1LL4$ - 6££9 41Ad `>IZ44$ - 6£E9 ELAd) '3O1A213S 31f1O21 03XId lOd
s sna ONO 1N3W3OVld3H XIS A0N3OV lISNV2i13N11Nf1S HOd A311VA V113H0VO0 NI
OL80171M
AON3OV
11SNV2113NI1Nf1S
'(8-g L# loafad) 4
elgel d121S 9L-4LOZAd panadde wail. dad 9LOZ ui;oafad MaN
(SdOONI :Val) (>IOZE$ - LO£9 4LAd) •Sldll
SflE1 OMl dO 1N3W3OV1d321 :A0N30V 11SNVH13NI1Nns 2iOd A311VA V113H0VO0 NI
608041AI21
AON3OV
lISNV2113N11Nf1S
(9 gl# loafad) q
algal d121S g1-410ZAd panadde way dlld g lOZ ul;oafad MaN
•(17-91# loafad) 4
elgel d121S 9L-4LOZAd panadde wail. dlld 910Z w;oafad MaN
'(SdOONI :Val)
(NOELS - LO£9 4LAd) 'S21VO d311321 ONO 1N3IN3OV1d321 0M1 ONV 'Af1S 2i0SIA213df1S
3N0 '>1Of12113NO 3SVHO21fld A0N3OV 11SNV211 3NI1Nf1S 21Od A311VA V113HOVO0 NI
'(SdOOONI :Val) (>104Z$ - LO£g £ lAd)
S1O3fO21d 1N31113AO21dWl dOlS Sf18 NO S3111A11OV 031V1321 ONINNVId 21Od SV 113M
SV '3O1A2i3S NOISNVdX3 ONV ONIISIX3 21Od 32IVM021VH 0NV 321VM1dOS '1N31/NdIr103
11 Sf owvA 3SVHO21fld A0N39V lISNV2113N11NnS 21Od A311VA V113HOVO0 NI
8090171AR1
L0804LAI21
AON39V
lISNV2113NIlNf1S
AON3OV
lISN'0113NI1Nl1S
•(Z-914#;aafwd) 4
ape' d121S g1-410ZAd panadde wal. dlld 9LOZ ui;oafad MaN
(31) (SdOOONI
:Val) (NO0L$ - LOEg 4LAd) SdOlS snotHVA 21Od (.013 'S311ddf1S 'SH3113HS `S31f103HOS
'8 SNVX31 NSOIN `S213NIV1NO0 HSV211 `S3HON3E1 '0"3) S3111N3INV dOlS Sfl9 '3ONVHN3
11SNV211 3SVHO21fld AON39V 11SNV2i1 3NI1Nf1S 21Od A311VA V113H0VO0 NU31SV3 NI
90804LAI21
AON3OV
11SNV2i13NI1Nf1S
•ueld ague;sissy 6ul;e�adp q
algal d12iS 91-14LOZAd panadde wail dlld g lOZ ul loafad MaN
'(SdOOONI
:Val) 91/410Z Ad 21Od 3ONVISISSV ON11V213dO 11SNV2IIV21Vd 0NV 31f1O21 O3XId
2iOd 3ONVISISSV ONI1VH3dO :A0N3OV 11SN' ll 3NI1Nf1S HOd A311VA V113H0VO0 NI
170904LAR1
AON3OV
lISNV2i13NI1Nf1S
(1-gl#loafad) d121S gLAd
ay; Lu04 sasnq uolsuedxa q adRl oM; pue (Z-ql#;aafad) d121S
papuawe 41Ad ay; wall sasnq uolsuedxa q adtl oM;;o s;slsuoo
pafad siyl •saeeA leluuaipenO dlld gLOZ ulloafad MaN
(Sd0001\11 :Val) ()1901$
4l Ad - Ol£g VIA) ()ILLS 41Ad '>189L$ ELM - LO£9 4LAd) 'S3Sfl8 lISNVH1V21Vd NOISNVdX3
_
(1d0E 4 3dA1) anw 3SVHO21f1d A0N3OV lISNV2113NI1N11S 21Od A311VA V113HOVO0 NI
108041AI21
AON3OV
11SNV2113N111VS
aul '121V1S1V0
col spun} nay; ssed s�eaA leluuaapenO dlld g 10Z ul ;Wald MaN
(O60£g VIA)
Sf18 Too 13f1d 01aL0313 01218AH N3OO21OAH 31VNIWOO
A21311VE1 M3N 3NO 3SVHO21fld - 3NI1Nf1S 21Od A1Nf1OO 3CISL+DA N N2131SV3 NI
Z090171/ 1
AON3OV
lISNV2113NIlNf1S
(L g1;Datad) d121S 91Ad ay; wail sasnq
;uawaoeldaJ q adl(l oM; pue (Z-ql#;aafad) d121S Papuawe
4LAd ay; wail sasnq;uewaoeldai q edAl oM; to s;slsuoo
pafad slyl sieaA leluualpenO ALA 910Z ulloafad MaN
(£L/ZL Ad LO£9 VIA) (SON2dS WIVd-A11O1V21O3H1V0-OIONI VZN
•SNVA 11SNV211VdVd ONIISIX3 (4) 3OV1d321 Ol SNVA
lISNV2i1V21Vd M3N (4) dO 3SVHO2111d - 3NI1NfIS 21Od A1Nf1OO 3O1S213Ald N2131SV3 NI
8090E LAN
AON3OV
1ISNV2113NI1Nf1S
uoseau a;epd(1
al;ll
al;0afad
Aoue6y
171.0Z/56/Z1 :lenoidde ymiu
1760Z ;snBny
�..o,�. 1 4.9 Tusk,
,........1NM. AM I• -oN wouipuawy le111.10d - dlld 960Z
LI.;o 6I. abed
91.0Z `91• tienuep;o sV
Wd 90:Z - 91.0Z/9L/L
xspcbol }uawpuauwV did 91.0Z
1.8 s}oafad Jo JagwnN
71.0Z/Z0/70
uo a}epdO d8H _lad sound Jo 6uiwwe.16ada2{ pue aseaaoul }so0
SN00 210A 6148l NI 8LZ' 1.$'8 `M21 21Od LL/9l NI £Z$ `3d 2:IW 714£1. NI 6£$ !3d 210d £l/ZI.
NI 06l$ :NOIIVZI11111 01 •(S3NV113AV2J11VNOIl1aaV ON) S30a12J8 ONI10f12J1SN0032J
2J0 S1N31A13AVd M0212IVN ONIN301M - S312J0931V0 Z 318V11dW3X3 9Z1;£6
12JVd 2IJO 07 H11M 11\131SISN00 32JV S103rOUd !VMS02Jd d8H - N0110(12I1SN0032,1
aNV NOI1V1I118VH321 3001218 2I0d S103f0Hd 03df10210 A1Nf100 301S213AN NI
1.0Z090nRi
saloue6V snouen
s}oafad
Jo; ilea 0VW0 JVAO Panadde waJ dlld S lOZ w }oafad nnaN
(>19£9`l$ - OVWO) "SONkJdS 10H 1213S30 0112J3S30
W1Vd W02Jd (Al2J(101-1) NOON2J31dV 3H1 NI Sd12J1
ancm aNV 1213S3a 1n11Vd Ol SONI2JdS 10H 12J3S3a W021J (Al2Jf10H) ONIN2J01A1 3H1
NI Sd12J1 anon 30f110N1 111M aNV SAVaN33M NO
31Ve3d0 01301M3S '1213S3O W1Vd CINV SONRJdS lOH 12i3S3a NNI1 A11032JIa 111M
1VH1301/g2J3S Sf18 MAN d0 SNOI1V2J3d0 ONV
S3Sf18 M3N OM! d0 3SVH02Jfld=A0N3OV 11SNV2J13NI1Nf1S 2J0d A311VA V113H0V00 NI
ZZ8071n12J
A0N30V
1ISNV2J1 3NI1Nf1S
s}oafad
Jo; IIeO 0VW0 JVnO panoadde wa; dlld 9lOZ ul }oafad nnaN
(NZ9L' L$ - °VINO) •SNVA OL Ol do 210A S31aisans 2JV3A 1SMJ ONV 301A213S
30V2J3H02J8 V 2J0d 103f021d dn-12JV1S 21V3A 332JH1 V 301AO2ld 111M WV2J00Ud 3H1
•SW\ 09 d0 3SVHalfld •SdfIO2iJ 2J3H10 aNV S1N3af11S 'S310N30V 1N3WN2I3A00
SV Hons al3AO1dW3 3OUV1 `S2J3MOM-pmn11f10RJJV A311VA V113H0V00 NU31SV3
13021V1111M 1VH1 WV2J002Jd 1011d 100dNVA 3NI1NIIS 2ICd A311VA V113H0V00 NI
1Z8071/U2J•
A0N3JV
lISNV2J13NI1Nf1S
(bl-9L#loa(ad) 7
aloe' d12iS 91.-7lOZAd panadde wok dild 9LOZ ul }oafad ANNI
(Sd00NI :VZfI) (H09 L$ - LO£9 7LAd) '311S SW1Vd
aNVSf10H1301dd0 3A11V/J1SININOV 3H1 AO 1NWId013n3a32i 3H1 d0 N011110W3a
3H1210d A1121VWRid A0N3OV 11SNV211 ANI1Nf1S 2J0d A311VA V113H0V00 NI
£L8071./U2i•
A0N39V
1ISNV2J13NI1Nf1S
1£1.-914 }oafad) 7
aloe' d12iS 9L-71.0ZAd panadde wad dlld 910Z uI }oafad meN
(SdOONI :VD1) (>108$ - LO£9 7LAd) '31IS SW1Vd aNVSn0H1
3H121W 31Vadfl NVId 2J31SVW :A0N30V 11SNV2113NI1Nf1S 2I0d A311VA V1131-10V00 NI
Z18071nRJ
AON3JV
11SNV2J13NI1Nf1S
uoseaa a}epdn
aI}Il
al }oafad
Aoua6V
760Z/96/Z 6 :Ienoudde VMHd
17603;sn6nd
....9).V.dw°14
"'"1...S o uaw ewao
-,� 6' N� uaua P b'I d-dl1d560Z
LL }o ZL abed
Wd 90:Z- 940Z/94/1.
xslx-601;uewpuewy dlld 9LOZ
-aseeJou!;soo Jou!w pue 'g 4/1740Z Ad uo!;onu;suoo u! spun} 1d1S
Jo} uo!;ez!l!;n;!pan Ho; }o uo!snlou! ay; apnloul sa6ueyo gay;O
(09Z210
V3) �LOZ/LZ/9 pa;ep 6u!;s!I �1!I!goW ddOHS aad `0V ddOHS
y;!on paoeldeJ spun} AON3OV - e6ue40 pund/aseeJoul;so0
210 V2131Al2i Ol N01103NN00 ONIISIX3 30V1d32:1 111M SdWV21 MAN 3H1 "NOLLVIS
N01103dSNINCI V213IAN Ol SdWV21 ONIISIX3 0/M „009'£ X021ddV AVM NOS80H
01 SdWV2i Ado 8/M ONV NO 8/M M3N 30IA(Md - 3H_LA18 d0 A110 3H1 NI OH NO
ZO£04 L/U21
A1Nnoo 3OIS213AN
'a;ep;uewnoop
le;uawuoa!nue ay; 6u!6ueyo pue uo!;duosap ay; u! pelapow
wenn;ey; s,01 }o Jagwnu;oauoo apnpu! o; uo!;oauoo leopgoal
'0A3f1N-AMNd 00 01W 1A1021d'9 dX3 VNO1A1V21/001VfV0-AMNd 00
OIW 2110 V3 NI Nl Xf1V 1. v 0A18 N32if18 NVA- 021 OA311N 2110 V3 NI Nl dW I. OOV :d1A11 94Z-1
'3d0131NV-SNVA3 Nl A2iVIlIXf1V 83'2 SNVA3-SONV1O321 Nl Xf1V d0 OOV 's01 OL X02IddV
d0 SN003N/SN00 'ONI `01NIOVf NVS NI 6L21S 011SV3 SI21213d NI 91-Z-I NM18 'IN
94 X021ddV (2110 V3 NI SN1 E) N1 mAHl 9 SN00 AMNd 00 GIN M3N - 00 A121 N2131S3M NI
81-Z4EOAN
01021
•s ea (leos3 LL£g ppe o; a6uey0 leo!uyoal
(NL$ - LL£9) •9LAd 210d 301A213S 11SNV211V21Vd ONV 31f1021 03XId 210d 30NV1SISSV
ON11V213d0 AON30V 11SNV211302i3A O1Vd 212 0d AlNf100 301S13AN N2i31SV3 NI
£0804LAI2i
AON3OV 11SNVaL
302i3A O1Vd
'dad 9LOZ u! spund Aoua6y se pa3!;uap! we 021S1A1 .171-0Z/44/9
uo uo!ss!wwoo Aq penoJdde 'spund alsyq .pappe @Jane spun}
02W1S}o N06V pue penoweJ aJBM spun} OVWO }o NO6q •spund
OVWO }o nen u! spun} alSW leuo!;!ppe ppe o; a6uey0 pund
SN01103a131N1 03ZI1VNOIS 917 ONIISIX3 1V
S2131102i1N00 1VNOIS OIddV211 M3N ONV 'SN01103S2131N1 A3N 94 1V SV2131A1V0 A100
'W31SAS 3NOSNOV8 011d0-21381d 13N213H13 NV ON10f110Ni `Sll d0 N0110M1SN00
ONV NOIS3O - A311VA ON32101A1 d0 A110 3H1 NI A1N1100 301S2i3AN 1\12131S3M NI
ZOZL9LnR1
ca e oua�o
II n W
a;epdn d8H 171.0Z/6Z/04
Jed 94/9 LOZ Ad of LL/9LOZ Ad wog} spun} }0 6u!wwea6adab
"(0900099 'ON 3901218) 133211S 3NV1 0/AA•IW ZZ'0
18 3NV1 17 V HlIM 3O011S 3NV1 Z •021 NOANVO 1VOS31A131
HSVM 1VOS3W31 213A0 30OI22
30V1d321 •ONIN3OIM/1N3W30V1d321 3001218 021 NOANVO 1VOSAW31- 3210NIS13 3N 1 NI
£OZ L L lAN
eJou!sl3 Nel
940Z/OE/90 011740Z/4E/Z4 wa} a;ep le;uewua!nue a6uey0
"(2110 HOV3 NI £) S3NV1 9 Ol
WIG 1-10V3 NI Z) S3NV1 17 1A102id L L L AVMHOIH d0 N301M 'SCNVONV1S VOV'N32121110 Ol
SAVM3ANO ONV SdWV21 'SN1VM3019 11V 31VOdf1 ONV SIVNOIS 01ddV21111V ONI1VOdf1
ON10f110N1 1S Xf10O18f121 011S NOSIOVW d0 1S3M ld 09L 1/4021d 41. L AVMHOIH
3A021d1All ONV 10f12i1SN003H - OIONI d0 A110 3H1210d A1Nf100 3O1S213A 121 N2131SV3 NI
LOOL9LAN
ow
a;ew!;sa s�aau!6ua s,�(;!o;sa;el gad asea�ou!;so0
" (M/21 bL/EL Ad 01009$
'8 ON3 ZL/LL Ad 010178$) .11X3 8S ONV 02i 0112P13013 W021d A211N3 8S NM18 ONV O21
01121213013 0111X3 8N ONV A211N3 8N NM18 SN1 Xf1V OOV 'SN1 17-Z W02Id 11X3 8N 'SN1
Z-L W02id AN1N3 8N 'SN1 9-Z W021d 1IX3 8S 'SN1 Z-L WONd A211N3 8S N3OIM/1SNO0321
`OH NAO O210d038 Ol O21 NAO 1VOS3W31 W021d SN1 f121H19 Ol Z 1A1021d 02i
001VfV0 N301M V NOI1V321/1SN0032:1 'N9IS3O=VN02100 2IV3N 01 021 001VI V0/9L-11V
80ZOLOnl21
VN02i00
'dad 940Z u! spund Aoue6y se pay!;uap! ale 02iSW '171-0Z/174/9
uo uo!ss!wwoo /Iq panadde 'spund 02iSW •Pappe aJann spun}
021S1/4 }o N9L pue panowai 9.19nn spun} OVWO }o NgL •spund
°VINO }o nen u! spun} O ISW leuo!;!ppe ppe o; a6ue40 pund
AVM3IVO 31VA1SV3 Ol OV021 NVWSI31H0S
W021d 3f1N3AV 213NWVH 9NO1V SN01103S2131N1 03Z11VN9IS OIddV211 XIS d0
NOLLVZIN021HOAS OIddVaL - 31VA1SV3 dO A110 3H1 NI A1Nf100 3OIS213n121 N2131S3M NI
40Z1.9LAN
alen;se o
3 } A110
uoseab a;epdn
awl
Ol;oafaad
kua6y
vi.oz 6/Z6 :lenoadde oyos
b60Z Jag wanoN
)n��,-
—, . .,,,mou Z •oN uoReoliiipoW ange4smuapV - dad 960Z
mod
RCTC
2015 FTIP - Administrative Modification No. 2 mew Mum
tivonid. Loamy tr(workmen
November 2014
SCAG approval: 12/16/2014
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
RIVERSIDE TRANSIT
AGENCY
RIV140823
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR RTA: OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FIXED ROUTE
AND PARATRANSIT OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FY 2014/15. (FY14 5307) (UZA: HEMET)
Technical change to add funding cycle years for federal funds.
RIVERSIDE, CITY OF
RIV131202
IN THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE - SR-91 AT ADAMS STREET INTERCHANGE: RAMP
RECONFIGURATIONS OF EAST BOUND ON AND OFF RAMPS AT ADAMS ST (PA&ED ONLY).
Technical change to incorporate corresponding 2012 RTP ID
3M01WT022
RIVERSIDE, CITY OF
RIV151205
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE - INSTALL FIBER-OPTIC
SIGNAL INTERCONNECT IMPROVEMENTS ON MARKET ST/MAGNOLIA AVE FROM FIRST ST
TO BUCHANAN ST AND INSTALL MISSING CONDUITS ON MAGNOLIA AVE FROM LA SIERRA
AVE TO PIERCE ST UPDATING 49 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Fund Change to add additional MSRC funds in Lieu of CMAQ
Funds. 375K of CMAQ funds were removed and 375K of MSRC
funds were added. MSRC Funds, approved by commission on
5/14/2014. MSRC are identified as Agency Funds in 2015 FTIP.
SUNLINE TRANSIT
RIV130507
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY - NEW FREEDOM PROJECTS
LUMP SUM FOR NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS (CONSISTENT W/40 CFR PART 93 EXEMPT
TABLES 2 AND 3 ) ( FY 11 & 12 - 5316 & 5317).
Technical Change to correct group listing project scope. There is
no scope or funding changes.
SI. No. 57
SUNLINE TRANSIT
RIV140804
IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY: OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR
FIXED ROUTE AND PARATRANSIT OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR FY 2014/15 (UZA:
INDCCPS).
Technical change to add funding cycle years for federal funds.
Number of Projects
13
2015 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of January 15, 2015
1/15/2015 - 2:05 PM Page 13 of 17
Ll 10 7l 96ed
Wd 90:Z - 910Z/9l/l
xslx"6o1;uai.upuewV dIU 910Z
A.Hunwwoo ebewenpes!p a u!;oafad papun} d1V
171.0Z/L1./ZI. 10 uo!;oaJ!P a6pe8 40.1c1V
Jed uogduosep loafad u! abenbuel 01 PPe o; a6ueyo leo!uyoal
'SNOIS >10V8033d 033dS 0M1 ONV 'S>IIVMSS0210 030NVHN3 3321141 'S3H0V021ddV
AVM3A1210 ONV SdWV21 SS300V O3d 30V21Odf1 'S>I1VM301S 11V1SN1 `AlINf1WW00
100HOS W313 NOSHOVf M3210NV 3141 NIH11M S133211S N31 NO S1N3W3n021dW1
03d W313 NOS>10Vf M321ONV — OIONI d0 A110 3H1 NI AiNnoo 301S213n121 N2131SV3 NI
8780171Al2d
o!pui
bIOZ/6Z/Ol }o a;epdn co-1 gad 'spun} }0 6u!wwe�6oada2}
"3001218 3H1 d0 301S HOV3 NO
N1VM301S ld 9 ONI0f110NI '0900100 "ON 3901218) 3901218 3NV1 unod V H11M 13NNVH0
2131VMW2101S A311VA V113H0V00 3H1213/10 ONISS0210 2131VM MO1 3NV1 OMl
77 3(1N3AV ONIISIX3 30V1d321 1N31/130V1d321 3OOI218 bb 3AV - OIONI d0 A110 3H1 NI
ZOZI l lAI21
o!Pul
10£ '0N 'I'S
sJeeA le!uuaipen0 dad 910Z ay; u!;oafad meN
(03Z121010W-NON ONV 03Z121010W H108) S3111110Vd NVI211S303d
ONV 310A018 - S31210031V0 £ 318V1 ONV Z S318V11dIN3X3 9Z1."£6 12lVd 21d0 OP H11M
1N31SISN00 321V S1031021d :C=1210100.1 - NON - S3111110Vd NVI211S303d ONV 3101018
210d S103f02Id 03df1021S -13013H d0 A110 3H1 2I0d AlNf1O0 301S2I3n121 N2131S3M NI
ZOZ1.171.n121
;awaH
LL/91.0Z
Ad o; £L/ZIOZ Ad wa} spund }0 6u!wwe�6oadab "bIOZ/6Z/Ol
}o a;epdn dal gad `s�eaA le!uua�pen0 aid 9lOZ u! oafad nnaN
•sias ino ONV ONI
-X 2131VM MO1 AO 1VA01A1321 (=INV `1011031021d unoos 13NNVH0 `SAVM3A1210/1VNOIS
01ddV21110f1211SN003N 'SN1VM301S 'S11V211/S3NV1 3)118 30f110N1 S1N3W3A021dWl
213H10 "N01103S2131N1 S98-21S 0111V2113H0VdV 0/M 1d-00£ W021d 3O01218 (2110 V3
NI SN1-£) N1-9 V H11M (9900100 "ON 3901218) ONI-X 2131VM MO1 N1-Z V d01N3W30V1d321
13NNVHo 2131VMW2101S V113H0V00 213A0 09 3AV - V113H0V00 d0 A110 3H1 NI
5Z8011nRi
eliayoeo0
bIOZ/6Z/Ol }o a;epdn d8H gad 'spun}}o 6u!wwe�6adaa
"(691.0099
"ON 3001218) 103f021d 3H1 d0 301S 1SV3 3H1 ONO1V >11VM3OIS ONV NVI031/1 03SIV21
V AO NOIlonuisNOo 3H1 ONIa11oN1 '(H1f10S 3H1 Ol "021 Z3213d ONV H1210N 3H1
Ol VOV211S3 VIA) 3001218 3H1 O/N _LA 09Z 013901218 3H1 O/S ld 09£ "X021ddV LAMA
'(2110 V3 NI SN1 £) SN19 Ol b W021d 210 W1Vd 31V0 d0 ONIN301M :213A121 2131VM311HM
3H1213A0 21O W1Vd 31V0 - A311VA V113H0V00 3H1 NI A1N000 301S213A121 1\12131SV3 NI
11O160n121
A1!0 leipay;e0
7# IS 6u!;s!1;oafad padnoa�
bIOZ '6 �agwaoa0 gawp 6u!;s!I ddOHS bIOZ gad;oafad nnaN
0012I3d 2131SVSI0 0321V103G A11V21303d 3H1
ONOA38 ON31X3 ins SONnJ d311321 AON39213W3 03d U0d AJnyn0 1VH1 S3OVWVO Ol
210 sONnd d311321 AON392131/s13 03d 210d AJnyn010N OO 1VH1 S39VWV0 Ol S311ddV
S10V 1SI 10212131210 `1S3uNf111A10 'S2131SVS10 1V21111VN A8 03Sf1Vo 3OVWV0 211Vd321
- Z 318V11dW3X3 9Z1."£6121Vd 21d0 Ob/M 1N31SISN00 321V S1031-021d :1A1V210021d
3SNOdS321 AON302131/13 ddOHS - 211Vd321 A0N3O213W3 210d S103f021d 03dGCMO
ZISIARi
sues;leo
"L# IS 6u!;sn (oafad pedna9
1710Z '6 Jegweoa0 pa;ep 6u4s11 ddOHS gad eseaJou!;s00
(S3NV1 13AV2111VNOI1IOOV ON) S3901218 ONI10f1211SN00321
210 S1N31A13AVd M0212IVN ONIN301M `(9Zl osn £Z) d3I1321 A0N30213013
'N011V11118VH321210/ONV ONIOVd21f1S321 1N31A13AVd - Z 318V11d1/13X3 9Zl"£6
12lVd 21d0 07 /M 1N31SISN00 321V S103f02Id=WV219021d NOI1Vn213S321d AVMOV021
ddOHS - NOI1V11118VH321 210/ONV ONIOVd2IGS3211N31,113AVd 210d S103f021d O3dnouo
ZOS1A121
suer;le0
1.1. 'oN TS
L;unoo
aplsJeAN u! s6u!ssa0 ape-10/0£l uo!;oas Jo} pafwd 6u1;s11
dna6 e o; pefad pa;s!I AIlenp!n!pu! a waa} pe6ueyo uogd!nsa0
(1,118Lb9Z0 "ON ONIX au ioasn al io) AVM11V21 dSN8 ONV
133211S 301121dS d0 N01103S2131N1 3H1 IV ONISS0210 30V210 OV02111V21 1V S021VZVH
31VNIW113 - SW111V° 210d 301SU3A121 d0 A110 31-11 NI AlNGOO 3OIS213A1 1 N2131S3M NI
L£80b14\121
sues;leo
uoseau a;epdn
al;!!
Ql;oafad
Aoue6V
:lenoidde NyMHA
1740Z lagwa3Ga
a� a
. -- _,._,,,; win.. i p •oN ;uewpuawy lewiod -dill 91.OZ
0 Od
L l Jo 91• abed
Wd 90:Z - 910Z/9 M.
xspx6ol }uawpuawV dlld 910Z
.salnpayos uoI}e6ilgo wauno gad 'gL/7l
Ad o} LL/91 Ad pue VIAL Ad wall spun;;o 6ulwwe.16oadaa
'NOIIV11118VH3a HO/ONV
ONIOVdafls3a 1N31A13AVd - S3IH0931V0 E 318V1 0NV Z S318V11d1A13X3 9Zl'£6 IaVd
ado OV H11M 1N31SISN00 3HV SlO3r0Hd - NOI1V1I118VH3a HO/ONV ONIOVdaflS3a
1N31A13AVd 2=10d S103f'0ad 03dflOHO - A1N1100 3aISH3/U21 Na31S3M 1f10HOf10aHl
1040£14\1H
OlOa
g UV I. Ad of bl/EL Ad ww; spun; uoo
6wwweJ6ada2{ .sieaA leiuuaapen0 dad 910Z ay} w pafald meN
'SNOO 1d1S 1-101V1A1
Ol 03Znun 38 111M S1IO3H0 1101 NI Z6Z$ '(S3111110Vd HO `s3anioflals 'SONI011f18
NOI1VlaOdSNVal 0I2:101SIH d0 NOI1Va3d0 ONV NOI1V1I118VH321 1d30X3) S3111A110V
1N31A13ONVHN3 NOI1VIHOdSNVa1- S312210031V0 £ 318V1 ONV Z S318V11dW3X3
9Z1'£6 121Vd ado OV H11M 1N31SISN00 321V S1O3f0Hd - S3111A11OV 1N3W3ONVHN3
NOI1VIHOdSNVa1a0d S1O3roHd 03df10219 - A1Nf103 301Sa3n1a 1f10HOnoHH1
LVOl70N2:1
OlOa
7lOZ/6Z/OL 6ugs11
a}epdn d8H gad `s.leaA leluualpen0 dlld g LOZ ay} uI loafald maN
'(gZ0009g #2 218H) 3AV 13NHVO 01 9NISSOHOa3A0 2121df1 1A1021d '(N01103H10
HOV3 NI £) S3NV1 9 Ol Z 1A1021d HO NOANVO NVI0N1 N301M SONIadS tN1Vd NI
LZL066n121
s6wpdg weed
710Z/6Z/01. 6u4s1I elepdn
d8H gad `91./g1 Ad of LL/9l Ad wall spun;;o 6uiwwe.thadad
'AaVSS303N SV
S321f1SV31A12131Nf100 floos ONV lld0a13a OIWSI3S ONICIMONl `Q9Z009g 'ON 3001a8)
3001218 a3AIH a31VM311HM 3Hl dO 1N31A130V1d32:1/ONIN301M 3H1 ONIOf11ONl ` CIA18
f1VONV1'8 a0 A3a Slfll NVS N33M138 (2i10 V3 NI SN1-£)1V1H3121V N1-9 V 011V1H3121V
N1-17 V W02id 'Oa NOWV21 d0 ONIN301M :'CIA18 f1VONV1'8 HO A321 Slfll NVS N33M138
ONIN301M .021 NOWVH - SONIadS 1A11Vd d0 A110 3H1 NI A311VA V113H0V00 3H1 NI
VZLOLLAN
s6uuds wled
710Z/6Z/01. 6uI}sil a}epdn
d8H gad '9L/LL Ad of LL/9I- Ad way. spun;;o 6wwwe.16aldaa
'Z900100 'ON 30012i8 - 3001a8 3NV1-17 M3N V H11M H3A1H 2131VM311HM 1V ONINO VlSIn
NO ONISSOHO a31VM MO1 3NV1-7 ONIISIX3 30V1d32:1 :SONIadS W1Vd dO A110 3H1 NI
g017060n121
s6uudg wled
71.0Z/6Z/01. 6ui;s11
a}epdn d8H gad `sleaA leluuaipen0 dlld gIOZ ay} w;oa(ald nnaN
(LZ00100 :# HUSH) N011VZI13NNVHO 33A31 d0 ONIISISNOO S1N3W3A0HdWO l 3OVNIVa
ONICIMONl '3001a8 3NV1-17 M3N V H11M ONISS0210 a31VM-M01 3NV1 V ONIISIX3
30V1d321 :13NNVHO 30VNIVaO HlflOs NOANVO SVN3aV a3A0 a0 NOANVO WIVd 'S NO
90Z1£0A121
s6uuds wled
(ela0 uol;aldwoO
�eaA auo pue gl/7lOZ Ad of £l/ZIOZ Ad wog spun; suoO
l0 6uiwwai6aldaa s�eaA leluua�pen0 dlld g LOZ uI }oafald meNNOI103S2131N1
'(gl/71. Ad 1SN00 NI OVWO HO1V1A1 f1 0103S
S1103a01101 l9$) L. L.1. AMH ON1108 NIHON 01 a0 ON121VM 032Id 0Nf108 1S3M Woad
3H1 IV 3NV1 Naf111HO1a 33ad V d0 NOI1Vaf101dN003a :L.L l AMH
8N 01 HO ONIaVM O3ad 8M-3NV1 Naf1111-1012:1 3321d—1a3S30 W1Vd d0 A110 3Hl NI
£7Z1L0/U21
Pasa0 wled
71.0Z/6Z/0l 6ugs11
alepdn d8H gad `s�eaA lepuaapen0 dlld g LOZ ay} ui Pafad meN
(LLOZ/CLOZ Ad NI MU HOd O3Znan S1103u311018Zg'LZ$) (Z91009g #218) S3HOVOaddV
03211f1032111V'8 S21301f1OHs /M 3AV SWVOV 01 3AV NOlONIHSVM W021d N33a0
V131aaf1W a3A0 (.007) 3001a8 as wwno 3NV1 Z M3N loflalSNOO - V13R121f1W NI
70ZL£0/Ua
e}awnW
(epAi L.Z. to }slsuoo nnou pue 171.0Z/6Z/9 pasinal s}I}auaq
g"Z Wd OVWO 'EV o} gV wog siapal}uoo leu6p oyleA aonpa pue
gZ o} gL wok suoi;oasla;ul /ai asea�oul o}a6ueyo uoi}dlrasa0
SN01103Sa31N1 03ZI1VNOIS 917 ONI1sIX3 1V
Sa3110a1N001VNOIS OIddV211 M3N ONV `SN01103SH31NI A3H 9l 1V SVa3WV0 A100
'W31SAS 3N08NOV8 OIIdO-21381d 13NH3H13 NV ONICIMONl 'S11 d0 NO11011211SNOO
ONV NOIS30 - A311VA ON32101A1 dO A110 3H1 NI A1N1100 30ISa3A1H Na3lS3M NI
ZOZL9LN21
Aallen oualon
fq!unwwoo a6eluenpesp a uI }oafoid papun; dlV
171.0Z/LHZl 10 uogoaijp a6pee }IflygV
_lad uovIposap }oafad ui eben6uel 01 ppe o} a6ueyo pop.poi
.S3SSV10
A13dVS 3)118'2 NOIVdWVO A13dVS O3d/3>I18 S3CIMONl 3af11Of l,nsVadNl-NON `1S
H1HOMS13 ONV '3AV 30V10 AONVS '1S ONIHOlIN '3AV 000MNOal '3AV sflld.l von3
'3AV V3VOVa0 NO ONIN301M 133211S'2 'SdWVH VCIV 'S1H011 1332i1S `Sa311f1O
'seam `S32:1f1S010 dVO N1VM301S d0 'Id 0178'Z 11V1SN1 S1N3W3A02idWl A1I1I0Vd
03d SlaS 301MA110 — A311VA ON32:1001 d0 A110 3H1 NI '00 301Sa3Al2:1 N2:131S3M NI
6780171n12i
fallen ouaJoW
uoseaa a}epdn
911LL
0l }oafad
Aou96V
:lenoadde `yMHd
1760Z aagwaoaa
.�.,0,.. ll420,)
,; ""-- mall Inn 17 •oN wewpuawy iewiod - dlld g60Z
L L }o 91, abed
W d 90:Z - 9 1-0Z/9 L/ L
xspc601;uawpuawV dlld 9LOZ
(£-91.1t) b elgel LL/91.0Z
- 91./171.0ZAd d121S panadde wa; dlld 9LOZ u! pafad nnaN
(>IbLLS - SH VZfI)
(LOE9 bl.Ad) 'ONV1A13O 30IAH3S 1331A1 Ol S3Sn8 11SNVH1V21Vd
NOISNVdX3 N31 d0 3SVH0Hrld :V121 HOd AlN000 3OISH3n1H NH31S3M NI
LZ80bLAIH
A01130V
lISNV211 30IS2i3n121
(L L 9L#) b aigel LL/91.0Z
- 9L/17LOZAd d121S Panadde wad dlld 91.0Z ul;oafad nnaN
(S3111110Vd
HO `S32in1on211S 'semolina N011V1HOdSNVH101H01SIH d0 N011VH3d0 ONV
NOI1V11118VH3H 1d30X3) S3111ALLOV 1N3W30NVHN3 N011V1HOdSNVH1- S31H0031V0
E 318V1 ONV Z S318V1
9ZVE6 1HVd 2Hd0 Ob HAM 1N31SISN00 3HV S103f0Hd S3111n110V 1N3W3ONVHN3
N011V1HOdSNV211 HOd ON11S11 dnoue V1H HOd A1Nn00 3OISH3AIH N2131S3M NI
9£80171.Al2i
A0N3OV
11SNV2:11 3OISH3A1H
"(71-0Z/9146) bL/£LOZ Ad ul spun; ld1S 10 uol;e6No
leJapad len;oe;oagaJ o} sea/ uoRonJ;suoo;o 6ulwweJ6adab
(obbf o :V3)
S3NV1 N21n1-1Heia 031V01030 03ON31X3 OOV 'S3NV1 NOLLVH31303o/N0I1VH31300V
dWVU o3oN31X3 30niom '(S3NVl Z) SdWVH AH_LN3 d001
8S ONV 8N M3N OOV '3NV1 AOH 3On10N1 Ol SdWV21 AH1N3 8S'8 8N 321ne1dN003H
`(S3NV1 E) SdWVH 1IX3 US ONV 8N 31V0013H `OH 3dOl31NV ONV O21 NnVH N33M138
S3NV1 HOn02iH19 0117 W021d N3OIM/10f1H1SN003H 01 CIH 1H0dM3N/912-1 1V
17£9090n12i
A1Nf1o0 30IS2i3nl2i
(bLOZ/9L/6)
bL/£LOZ Ad ui spun; ld1S;o uoi;e6llgo leaapad pue (bLOZ/OZ/8 do
a}on uoi}eoolle OlO) bL/£LOZ Ad ul spurt d121 dllS 10 uol}e6ilgo
OlO len}oe }oaga� o;sea! uol}ona}suoo;o 6ulwwe�6oada2i
(0Z9Lb:V3) 'S3NV1 N21n1-1HDIH
031VO103o OOV ONV `(31IW b/L>) 11X3 83 ONV A2i1N3 8M 1V S3NV1 13030/1300V
OOV (03Onl0NI 3NV11V11N3213d3Hd AOH ON) ON1H313W dWV21 ONICIMONI
WV2i 2i1N3 M3N OOV 'SdWV2i oIM 'Wacin Ol 021 H3N21Vn d0 A1213H1nOS)
'Sd A N3
S3NV1 9 01 Z 01 N3oIM'8 '11e11V3H '10n211SNooau OI 1S NOSH31d3f/OL-11V
OZ9Lb
A1Nf100 301SH3n121
"s.1e9A leiuueJpen0 dlld 91-0Z w pefad meN
(91-Ad NI 01 E8L'Z$ ONV bLAd NI 03Sn
01 £LO`Z$) S3111110Vd ONV ONINHVd NOLLVIS )IN110H1.3W d0 8VH3H ONV 'NOISNVdX3
'SdWI'8 `"VO "OS NI Old d0 "n3O `sWnl `(SHVO 11VH 2130N3SSVd/S3nIlOW00o1)
NO01S 0111110H 'S3111110Vd H3n0AVl'21VOINVH03111 'NOLLVOINGIAMOO `S1V11eIS
'>10VH1 d0 8VH3H ONICIMONI '>IN110H131A1/M NOLLVNICIH000 NI 11VH 'WW00 &alai
d0 8VH3H 11AId1n03 ONV S3111110Vd d0 •d1,11 0I1V1A131SAS 11VH 2131nWWo0 OlO2i
LOLOZLnRi
01021
s.IeaA leiuuaapen0 dlld 9LOZ ul afad nnaN
(9 LAd Hod
01)16L9'E$) .(0NI1He11 `SW2l0d1V-Id 3H10110aLN00
SS300V'2 ONION3d) S1N31A13AOHdW1 A1Ri103S/A13dVS'8 `(30VNOIS 'S>IS01>1 OdNI
'S3NIHOVW ONION3AX11) S30V21edn A0010NH031
'S3111110Vd H3n0AV1 ONV NOV211'(30VHO_LS'8 SH1Vd 3)118 `SAVM)11VM `S3OOR18
03d 'SW210d1V1d NOLLVIS) SS300V H3ON3SSVd
3n0HdWl 01)I11I10H131/1 /M NOLLVNIO21000 NI S30VHOdn 11VH H31nWW00 010H
EOZLbLA12i
010H
aull lqunoO owp�ewa8 ueS ay; sassao }ey};oafad ay};o
y}�ou ay; o} a6eu6ls aouenpe uol;one;suoo o; sa;elan }i se s}iwil yid
uoi;eogiaelo a;ewl}sa s,�aaw6ua;sa;el gad asea�oul;soO
-(A1Nno3
ONICIUVNU38 NVS NI E. L Wd) 8Z•Z9 Wd Ol (0921S) b"L9 Wd N33M138 oN3 H1HON
3H11V ONV (OH 001VfV0) 9'9£ Wd Ol E17E Wd N33M138 ON3 H1nOS 3H1 V O311V1SNl
38111M 3eVNOIS 30NVAGV •(9.9E Wd) OH o01VfVO 01 (6"Zb Wd) AM)Id A311Vn N3OOIH
W02id (HIO V3 31 L) Sill 31 Z SN00 ONV (6•Z17 Old) AM>id A311Vn N300IH Ol (b"L9 Wd)
09HS 1410Hd (2110 V3 316 (131) SNl HdX31101 b 10n211SNO0 =A1Nf100 3OISH3n1H NI 9 L-I
L9ZLLOnl2i
010Hpua;o
"alnpayos uol;e6llgo
weJJno gad '9 L/bL Ad 01 LL/9L Ad wo.11 spun;;o 6ulwweJ6oadab
"N011V11118VH3H HO/ONV
0NIOVd21nS3H 1N31A13AVd - S312:10e31V0 E 318V1 ONV Z S318V11d1A13X3 9ZVE6121Vd
21d0 Ob H1IM 1N31SISN00 3HV S103f0Hd - NOI1V1I118VH3H HO/ONV e11I0Vd21nS3H
1N31A13AVd HOd S1031021d 03d1-10210 - A1N000 3OISH3n1H N2i31SV3 1nOHenoHki
ZObOELnR1
01021
uoseaa alepdn
al;Il
al peroid
Aoue6V
:jenoidde ` AAHd
ursomojumo esumlo"""..21
_.....,,,-MI�+�
VW aaquia3ea
o uaw ua eua�o
17' N � P uiv I d - dlld S60Z
2015 FTIP -Formal Amendment No. 4
December 2014
CD
N""&MIA
COL. r,,,„,,,,,,,„{,,,s,ia
FHWA approval:
Agency
Project ID
Title
Update Reason
Temecula
RIV140301
IN WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA - CONSTRUCT REMAINING
ONE MILE MISSING LINK IN THE SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK RECREATIONAL MULTI -USE
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE TRAIL FROM YNEZ ROAD TO MURRIETA CREEK MULTI-
PURPOSE TRAIL.
New Project in the 2015 FTIP Quadrennial Years
Various Agencies
RIV050201
IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY GROUPED PROJECTS FOR BRIDGE REHABILITATION AND
RECONSTRUCTION - HBP PROGRAM; PROJECTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH 40 CFR PART
93.126 EXEMPT TABLE 2 CATEGORIES - WIDENING NARROW PAVEMENTS OR
RECONSTRUCTING BRIDGES (NO ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANES). TC UTILIZATION: $23 IN
16/17 FOR R/W; $1,278 IN 18/19 FOR CONS
Cost increase per 10/29/2014 HBP funding update
Number of Projects
28
2015 FTIP Amendment log.xlsx
As of January 15, 2015
1/15/2015 - 2:05 PM Page 17 of 17
AGENDA ITEM ZO
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 26, 2015
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager
Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director
SUBJECT:
Draft Obligation Delivery Plan — FFY 2014/15
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
RCTC had great success with the delivery of its federal obligation plan in FY 2013/14. As the
result of our combined efforts, the region received $2,443,743 in August Redistribution that is
basically the result of funding not obligated by other states. As we start the race to the
obligation delivery plan for FFY 2014/15, RCTC asks you stay on track with the processing of
your federal obligations. Based on your responses through the project milestone report
updates, we estimate that approximately $16 million of CMAQ funds and $39 million of STP
funds will be obligated in FFY 2014/15. The adjusted obligation authority for FFY 2014/15 is
$41,653,733 as of December 19, 2014, exceeding our obligation authority by approximately
$13.2 million. If all the planned obligations move forward, RCTC will have to secure a loan
from another Commission. The best possible outcome is if all the planned obligations move
forward, perhaps RCTC will have a second year of August redistribution in FFY 2014/15.
The Draft FFY 2014/15 obligation delivery plan is included as an attachment to this report.
The report segregated the planned obligations based on the Multi -Funding Call for Projects
Award of January 8, 2014, the 2013 Surface Transportation Program Pavement
Rehabilitation Awards of 2013, CVAG's CMAQ Call for Projects Awards, and one remaining
project from the Transportation Enhancement Program. There are two Requests for
Authorization (RFA) Columns in the spreadsheet to track the delivery delays and/or adjusted
RFA schedules. Please take a look at the RFA schedules and notify me of any changes so
we can finalize the obligation delivery plan for submittal to Ca!trans in March 2015.
Since most of the projects come from a competitive process and points were awarded to the
projects based on project readiness, RCTC decided to include in the comment section of the
spreadsheet the agreement number, the project phase that is funded, and the anticipated
start of the project phase based on the executed agreements. RCTC will continue to monitor
the progress of the project delivery to use as perhaps a new scoring category for future call
for projects.
RCTC would like to reiterate our Planning and Programming staff is available to assist you
with the processing of the RFA and to help you navigate through the federal -aid process.
Looking forward to a great FFY 2014/15 delivery year!
RIVERSIDE COUNTY - DRAFT FFY 2014/2015 OBLIGATION PLAN
4<nke Cann trmmsim Con iWa-
Agency
FTIP ID
Project Location
Project Scope/Description
RFA Subm. To
Caltrans D-8
(Originally
Purposed)
RFA Subm. To
Caltrans D-8
(Newly
Projected)
CMAQ
STP-L
Funding
Phase
Project
Phase
FTIP
Funding
Year
Comments
Beaumont
RIV050535
SR60/Potrero Blvd. Interchange Ph.l
IC Project
9/1/2014
1/31/2015
S 8,929,000
Con
ROW Cert
y
Agmt 14-72-140-00- Const funded phase
with a start date of June 2014; Eminent
Domain may delay obligation to FY
2015/16.
Ca limesa
RIV060116
I-10/Cherry Va',ey C
PA&ED
1/1/2015
6/30/2015
$ 443,000
Eng
PA&ED
y
Agmt 14-72-121-00 - Environmental
funded phase with federal obligation Jan
2015
Coachella
RIV151217
Ave 48 from Jackson to Van Buren
Street Widening
11/1/2014
6/22/2015
S 2,278,000
Con
Pre PA&ED
N
Agmt 14-72-147-00 Cons funded phase
with a start of cons Jan 2015; EPSP
concurrenced needed from SCAG
CVAG
RIV140820
Coachella's Regional Traffic Synchronization
System Integration
ITS
7/1/2015
1/1/2015
$ 7,750,000
ITS ENG
N
CVAG's CMAQ Call for Projects Award.
EPSP concurrence needed from SCAG.
Eastvale
RIV151201
Hamner Ave
Hamner Ave Signal
Synchronization
11/1/2014
4/1/2015
$ 142,150
Con
Pre PA&ED
y
Agmt 14-72-122-00- Const funded phase
with a start date of March 2015 (CMAQ
and MSRC funding);
Needs EPSP concurrence from SCAG
Palm Desert
RIV071243
Free rt - Fred Waring/111
Reconfigure Right Turn
10/3/2014
12/15/2014
$ 531,000
Con
ROW Cert
Y
CMAQ CMAQ-Call for Projects Award
2007-2008.
Funding reprog to FY 2014/15 in 2015
FTIP A-4.
Rancho Mirage
RIV140814
Bob Hope Dr and Dinah Shore Dr
4 ft high sand fencing
12/1/2014
1/1/2015
$ 101,000
PA&ED
Pre PA&ED
Y
CVAG'S CMAQ Call for Projects Award
2014.
Rancho Mirage
RIV140815
Ramon Rd and Dinah Shore Dr
Pork Chop Island, pole
replacement and relocation and 4
ft high sand fencing
12/1/2014
1/1/201S
$ 204,000
PA&ED
Pre PA&ED
Y
CVAG'S CMAQ Call for Projects Award
2014.
Rancho Mirage
RIV110130
Monterey Ave. SB Widening - Dinah Shore to
Gerald Ford
Widening Road and
Improvements
1/1/2015
2/21/2015
$ 850,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Prior Call for Projects Award.
Environmental delays.
Riverside
RIV151206
SR 91 Lime to Mulberry
Pedestrian Bridge
7/17/2014
6/1/2015
$ 638,000
Eng
Pre PA&ED
Y
Agmt 14-72-127-00 Environmental
funded phase with May 2014 schedule
Riverside
RIV131202
Adams St at 91 IC
PA&ED
7/17/2014
7/24/2014
$ 935,000
Eng
PA&ED
Y
Agmt 14-72-146-00 Environmental
funded schedule May 2014.
RFA for PE at D8 as of 7/24/2014
Riverside
RIV351209
4 Locations
Bike Lockers for last mile share
10/1/2014
3/1/2015
$ 240,000
Con
Pre PA&ED
y
Agmt 14-72-130-00 Cons funded phase
with start of cons June 2015.
Riverside
RIV151215
Bruce Street
Sidewalks
10/1/2014
3/1/2015
$ 195,000
Con
Pre PA&ED
y
Agmt 14-72-131-00 Cons funded phase
with start of cons Sept 2015
Riverside
RIV151216
Magnolia Ave from Buchanan to Banbury
Street Widening
12/1/2014
6/1/2015
$ 2,620,000
Con
Pre PA&ED
N
Multi -funding Call for Projects Award.
EPSP - Need Concurrence from SLAG.
Riverside
RIV151205
Magnolia Ave from Third street to Buchanan
Signal Synchronization
1/2/2015
6/1/2015
$ 1,012,500
Con
Pre PA&ED
N
Agmt 14-72-126-00 - Cons funded phase
with start of cons in Sep 2015
Riverside
RIV151208
Santa Ana Bike Trail
Realign and Reconstruct Bike Trail
1/2/2015
6/1/2015
$ 141,000
Con
Pre PA&ED
N
Agmt 14-72-129-00 Cons funded phase
with start of cons Dec 2015; EPSP
concurrence needed from SCAG.
Riverside County
RIV110302
I-10 in the City of Blythe
New W/B on and off ramps
10/1/2014
10/28/2014
$ 810,000
Con
PS&E
Y
STPLN-5956(240) - RFA sent to HQs on
11/26/14
Sunline
RIV140821
Eastern Coachella Valley
Vanpool Pilot Program
7/3/2015
4/1/2015
$ 1,762,000
Con
Pre PA&ED
y
CVAG's CMAQ Call for Projects Award
2014.
Sunline
RIV140822
Desert Hot Springs to Palm Desert
New Bus Service
7/3/2015
4/1/2015
$ 1,536,000
Con
Pre PA&ED
y
CVAG's CMAQ Call for Projects Award
2014.
Jan. 14,2015
Agency
FTIP ID
Project Location
Project Scope/Description
RFA Subm. To
Caltrans D-8
(Originally
Purposed)
RFA Subm. To
Caltrans D-8
(Newly
Projected)
CMAQ
STP-L
Funding
Phase
Project
Phase
FTIP
Funding
Year
Comments
Temecula
RIV62029
Park and Ride Facility
Park and Ride Facility
9/1/2014
11/15/2014
$ 1,300,750
Con
PS&E
y
Agmt 14-72-135-00 Cons funded phase
with start of cons Jan 2015
Temecula
RIV62031
I-15/SR-79 IC
IC Project
11/1/2014
1/1/2015
$ 12,976,000
Con
R/W
Y
Multi -funding call for Projects Award.
Blythe
RIV130402
N. Broadway Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
11/1/2014
4/1/2015
$ 150,000
Con
Pre PA&ED
Y
RFA scheduled for 4/1/2015
Calimesa
RIV130401
Calimesa and Avenue L Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
1/5/2015
6/30/2015
$ 54,000
Con
Pre PA&ED
Y
May use EPSP - Need Concurrence from
SCAG
Coachella
RIV130402
Grapefruit Blvd. Pavement
Rehabilitation/Reconstruction
Pavement Rehab
10/3/2014
4/23/2015
$ 215,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
FPN request rcvd by LA 8/22/14
Corona
RIV130401
Ontario Ave Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
10/1/2014
3/1/2015
$ 832,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Desert Hot Springs
RIV130402
Hacienda Ave & Mission Lakes Blvd. Surface
Rehab
Pavement Rehab
9/1/2014
1/15/2015
$ 182,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
12/16/14 DP -RFA to LA 1/15/2015
Hemet
RIV130401
Gilbert St. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
10/1/2014
1/1/2015
$ 443,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Indian Wells
RIV130402
Cook Street Rubberized Overlay
Pavement Rehab
11/1/2014
4//15/2015
$ 135,000
Con
Pre PA&ED
y
12/16/14 - KS start of cons is July -Aug
2015
Indio
RIV130402
Old Hwy 111 Pavement Reconstruction
Pavement Rehab
1/7/2015
2/2/2015
$ 477,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
La Quinta
RIV130402
Washington St. Improvements
Pavement Rehab
7/15/2014
2/1/2015
$ 250,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Lake Elsinore
RIV130401
Gunnerson St. Pavement Rehabilitation
Pavement Rehab
11/15/2014
1/1/2015
$ 286,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Menifee
RIV130401
Newport Rd Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
6/30/2015
7/1/2015
S 323,000
Con
Pre PA&ED
Y
Moreno Valley
RIV130401
Frederick St. and Elsworth St. Pavement
Rehab
Pavement Rehab
8/1/2014
11/6/2014
$ 1,084,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
12/16/14 - QN RFA to LA 11/6/14
Murrieta
RIV130401
Jefferson Ave. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
10/1/2014
3/1/2015
$ 593,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Palm Desert
RIV130402
Portola Ave. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
10/3/2014
3/23/2015
$ 336,000
Con
ROW Cert
Y
Palm Springs
RIV130402
Ramon Rd. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
10/30/2014
10/1/2014
$ 396,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Rancho Mirage
RIV130402
Old Hwy 111 Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
4/8/2015
2/1/2015
$ 162,000
Con
ROW Cert
V
Riverside
RIV130401
Indiana Ave. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
6/27/2014
6/27/2014
$ 1,810,000
Con
ROW Cert
Y
RFA comments sent to City 7/2/2014
Temecula
RIV130401
Winchester Rd. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
9/1/2014
12/1/2014
.. 646,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Wildomar
RIV130401
Clinton Keith Rd Slur Seal
Pavement Rehab
6/30/2014
8/14/2014
$ 136,000
Con
ROW Cert
Y
STPL-5484(006) - RFA sent to LA 8/14/14
Corona
RIV041047
Magnolia & El Camino Ave
TE project
10/1/2014
4/1/2015
$ 943,000
Con
PA&ED
Y
Last TE project category.
TOTAL
$ 15,996,400
$ 38,851,000
RFA Subm review
FY 2014/15 Obligations as of 1/14/2015
Eastva le
RIV130401
Schleisman Ave. Pavement Rehab
Pavement Rehab
7/17/2014
6/30/2014
$ 199,000
Con
ROW Cert
V
STPL-5486(002) -Obligated 12/19/2014
RCTC
RIV041047
Downtown Station Improvements
Transit Station Improvements
11/14/2014
$ 1,485,526
Con
Con
FY 12/13
STPL-6054(0474) - Obligated 12/5/2014
Reverse EPSP.
Cathedral City
RIV130402
East Palm Canyon Dr. Rehab
Pavement Rehab
2/12/2014
10/23/2014
$ 336,680
Con
Con
FY 3/14
Si PL-5430(032) - Obligated 12/19/2014
(EPSP).
Total Obligations:
2,021,206
Jan. 14,2015
AGENDA ITEM 11
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE:
January 26, 2015
TO:
Technical Advisory Committee
FROM:
Lorelle Moe -Luna, Senior Staff Analyst
SUBJECT:
Active Transportation Program (ATP) Updates
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Cycle 1
For those who have been awarded under Cycle 1, please remember to submit your allocation
requests to Caltrans by the agenda due dates as shown on the Caltrans website and found
below.
Local Agency Submits Allocation
Requests to Caltrans Local
Assistance
2015 CTC Meeting Schedule
Monday, November 24, 2014
January 22 — Sacramento Area
Monday, January 26, 2015
March 25-26 — Orange County
Monday, March 30, 2015
May 27-28 — Fresno Area
Monday, April 27, 2015
June 24-25 — Sacramento Area
Monday, June 29, 2015
August 26-27 — San Diego Area
Monday, August 24, 2015
October 21-22 — Bay Area
Monday, October 12, 2015
December 9-10 — Inland Empire
Source: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hWtransprog/ctcliaison/Schedules/2015%20Calendars/2015 INTERNET Prep updated Nov1814.pdf
Please ensure that a copy of your allocation request is submitted to Lorelle Moe -Luna for our
records. RCTC staff is happy to assist in the allocation process, if needed, and requests that
you allow additional time for review prior to submitting to Caltrans.
An updated spreadsheet of the proposed allocation dates for the MPO and Statewide
projects are found in Attachment A.
Cycle 2
Cycle 2 of the Active Transportation Program (ATP) is expected to commence on March 26,
2015 upon the adoption of the program guidelines by the California Transportation
Commission (CTC). ATP is funded from various federal and state funds appropriated in the
annual Budget Act. A total of $359 million is available from three years of funding under
MAP-21 (Fiscal Years 16/17 — 18/19) for two years of programming. Pursuant to state and
federal statutes, the funds must be distributed on a statewide, large Metropolitan Planning
Organizations (MPO), and small urban and rural basis as shown in the table below. A
minimum of 25% of the funds must benefit disadvantaged communities. Up to 5% may be
set aside to fund active transportation plans in predominantly disadvantaged communities.
Funding
Distribution
Category
$179.5
50%
Statewide
$143.6
40%
Large MPOs (population > 200,000)
$35.9
10%
Small Urban/Rural areas (population < 200,000)
$359.0
100%
Total
Program Goals
Pursuant to state statute, the goals of the program are to:
• Increase the proportion of biking and walking trips;
• Increase safety for non -motorized users;
• Increase mobility for non -motorized users;
• Advance the efforts of regional agencies to achieve greenhouse gas reduction goals;
• Enhance public health, including reduction of childhood obesity through the use of
programs including, but not limited to, projects eligible for Safe Routes to School
Program funding;
• Ensure disadvantaged communities fully share in program benefits; and
• Provide a broad spectrum of projects to benefit many types of active transportation
users.
Eligibility
Applicants from various public agencies such as cities, counties, MPOs, Regional
Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPAs), and school districts may apply. All applicants
must be able to comply with all federal and state laws, regulations, policies and procedures
required to enter into a Local Administering Agency -State Master Agreement.
Eligible projects include: 1) infrastructure such as environmental, design, right-of-way, and
construction; 2) development of a community -wide bicycle, pedestrian, safe routes to school,
or active transportation plan in a predominantly disadvantaged community; 3) non -
infrastructure projects for education, or pilot or start-up projects; and 4) infrastructure projects
with non -infrastructure components. The minimum request for infrastructure projects is
$250,000 and is not applicable for non -infrastructure projects.
Scoring Criteria
CTC has solicited comments from MPOs and county transportation commissions to improve
the guidelines, including scoring criteria, and application process. Applicants should expect
the majority of points to be given to projects that have a potential for increased walking and
bicycling and improving the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians. A comparison of the scoring
criteria from Cycle 1 and Cycle 2 are as follows:
Cycle 1
Final
Cycle 2
Draft
Scoring Criteria
30 pts
25 pts
Potential for increased walking and bicycling, especially among
students, including the identification of walking and bicycling routes
to and fro schools, transit facilities, community centers, employment
centers, and other destinations; and including increasing and
improving connectivity and mobility of non -motorized users.
25 pts
30 pts
Potential for reducing the number and/or rate of pedestrian and
bicyclist fatalities and injuries, including the identification of safety
hazards for pedestrians and bicyclists.
15 pts
15 pts
Public participation and planning
10 pts
10 pts
Cost effectiveness
10 pts
10 pts
Improved Public Health
10 pts
10 pts
Benefit to disadvantaged communities
100 pts
100 pts
Total
Potential Deductions
-5 pts
-5 pts
Use of California Conservation Corps (CCC) or a Certified
Community Conservation Corps
-10 pts
-10 pts
Applicant's performance on past grants and deliverability of projects
The ATP process includes sequential project selection, meaning that projects that are not
ranked high enough in the statewide competition would automatically have a second
opportunity for funding through the large MPO share. The Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG), as our MPO, will allow the Regional Transportation Planning Agencies
(RTPAs), such as RCTC to review the applications submitted to the state from Riverside
County and add up to 10 points for projects that are consistent with bicycle and pedestrian
plans adopted by local and regional governments. In Cycle 1, RCTC's share of SCAG's large
MPO pot was approximately $9 million, or 12%, and was based on geographic equity and is
likely to be approximately the same in Cycle 2.
Based on discussions and workshops between agency staffs during the Cycle 2 draft
guidelines period, common themes that have been raised include the definition of a
disadvantaged community; whether local funding contributions should receive additional
points; how the allocation process can be streamlined; and whether additional points should
be given for project readiness and/or multi -jurisdictional projects.
Timeline
The CTC developed the following draft timeline with major milestones for the development
and adoption of the 2015 ATP Cycle 2:
Guidelines hearing
Jan. 22, 2015
CTC adopts Fund Estimate
Mar. 26, 2015
CTC adopts ATP Guidelines
Mar. 26, 2015
Call for Projects
Mar. 26, 2015
Project applications due to CTC
May 31, 2015
Large MPOs submit optional guidelines to CTC
May 31, 2015
CTC approves or rejects MPO guidelines
Jun. 25, 2015
CTC recommendation for statewide and rural/small urban portions of
the program
Sep. 15, 2015
CTC adopts statewide and rural/small urban portions of the program
Oct. 22, 2015
Projects not programmed distributed to large MPOs based on location
Oct. 22, 2015
Deadline for MPO project programming recommendations to the CTC
Nov. 15, 2015
CTC adopts MPO selected projects
Dec. 10, 2015
Given the success of the number of awarded projects in Riverside County from Cycle 1,
RCTC staff would like to continue this momentum in Cycle 2 and offer its assistance to local
agencies considering applying for ATP funds in the next round.
Resources:
Cycle 2 Discussion Draft Guidelines —
http://www.catc.ca.00v/programs/ATP/201 5/Discussion
Cycle 2 Draft Application —
http://www.catc.ca.00v/programs/ATP/2015/Draft ATP
Draft 2015 ATP Guidelines 11 21 14.pdf
Application -Cycle 2.pdf
suRATA
I£6'TZ
LTO'L
bT6IT
T£6'TZ
LS26
0I/OZ/8 panaddy Do maims
T£6'TZ
04£:::::::::
-
05£
OSE
SIItZ/.0.Z/9:
SIaF/LZ/tr:
• ::•
0$s :::::::_
-
OS£
OS£
£580bTAS
ON
L'6L
uogeoo!ry Do
IeR!w9n5 Jll
sulad;o A15) wel8ad
uoRellodsuell an!lwy SlaS
H&J
of aP!slan!N
89L0
T8S'TZ
586:::: :::
-
686
�::'
LO8
:: 9L0Z/T%T_::
::STOZ4461:::
•':':'• ''•'''
-.LOB:::;;:::::
.
ZST
:sOZ/e2fE:•
: SOZ f94/f _ : •
92't::: ::.::
'�..
:sPlif,02ft::
: 3?834?0(R� ; ;
9S:::::.•::
686
686
92800TA18
S3A
078
uo!1eoo11V DID
IeR!w9nS DID
S18S 03upef ues an!loy"8 a;eS
olupef ueS
Z£SO
Z6S'OZ
-
049'T
009'T
084'T
9IOZ/T/9
9TOZ/T/0
080`I
09T
SIOZ/SZ/£
STOZ/9Z/T
IL
SIOZ/SZ/£
STOZ/9Z/T
68
029'T
0091
62800TAI8
ON
£'b8
uo!le000•Do
lel!!w4nS J1J
sluawanoldwl
Alquei pad 5185 aP!n�10
a oualo
II A W
ZISO
ZS6'8I
.
LOZ:::
.
2L2Z
T8S'Z
2L2Z
910Z/T/9
9TOZ/I/2
bL£'Z
LOZ
:5102/*Z/9::
.: 5102fE0.1,::
96: ::
*TOZ1044G:
, ::P?1g78pb ::
:::.'
T2 '. ::
I8S'Z
T8S'Z
82802FTA1a
ON
L48
uoueoo!!y Jll
1e11!w9nS DID
sluawanoidw!
Pad iueluawa!3 uompef malPuy
o!Pul
6050
TL29i
'•'
;Z112"•C:::::::
ZOZ'T
ZOZ'T
:: 9L0Zf.T)9:::
:: 9,L0Z/Tib:::
' : : : •pe1f_!auuelp
:ZOZ!i::!-'' '
-
-
ZOZ'i
8Z8'£
IS800TAIH
ON
£'98
uopeoolly Jll
IeR!w4ns Do
u!ei0 uuolS AalleA sulad
H•ood
9TS0
69YSi
- -
:
006'0i
0020T
006%
SIOZ/TZ/OT
STOZASL8
006'£
000'4
bIOZ/8/OT
Pale3002
000'L
006'0T
65266
SOOTETAIN
S3A
0'L8
ug4eoolPd Jll
!eur.ugn5 Do
lu!T AD
9VAJ
LOSO
69Z'b
:••
LL8:::::::::
-
1
LLB
LL8
:9TQZ/I;E15::
:: 9IO2/iii<:;
:LLB:-;::::
-
LL8
L66
ZS804TAN
S3A
018
u.n.o.: !H, aD
1e11!o0oS JJJ
sluawanoldwi pad pue apAo!B
sexy Bu!u!ofpy pue umolumod
a P.loan! H
6150
Z6£'£
iy4 :
599
Z£S
Si0,2fE2fQi::
:5i02./2 0:'
ZCFt-;:;:;:;:
££I
'' anaJ{K:E
•TC2:9Z:'. '
ESE :
599
Z£L
85804TAI8
ON
0"68
uo!leoa!!y Do
IewuxinS Jl.D
loafold SINS lS oZPAd
AaOeA ednmf
IISO
LZL'Z
00YT,::
OOT'T
OOI'T
STOZY9Z/$::
�SIO?i %9:,
• .
:OOI!T::::::::
OOTI
002T
0S800iA18
S3A
L'68
uopelolly aLD
Iewugns Do
nuawanaldwi
Pod Peoy elo!LntAl
sPAad
SI50
LZ9'T
00$:::
005
-
OOS
:5 g1:1Z.Zf9::
: ST.O.liZ/4::
00$::::::;::
005
005
£5800TAIH
ON
£'06
uo!leoo!!y Do
leuuucrIS DID
o!Pul Jo AID SINS
Hd0
of ap!slan!a
OLLO
LZL'T
LZ9::
-
LZ9
ZOS
STO,Z4T210L:
:5TOZ.212. E:::
Z65:::.:
. -
SZI
: 510Ff5Z1.E::
:Si02f9Z/T::
5ZT :'::':::
LZ9
689
LS800TAI8
ON
S'T6
uopeoo!!y Jll
IeR!w9nS DID
1S 41o11-SIBS
AalleA ednlnf
OTSO
00S
065:::::::::
-
00S
I
00S
ST0.0244:
5i0:Z/LZ/$:
Oa4::: ::
.
005
005
ES80AI8
0T
ON
L'26
uo!leoolly Jll
lell!w4nS DID
AalleA ednin2;0 Ay'S1NS
Hd0
of ap!van!y
69LO
•
:'''''• ''• • '• -'
T,.,;,
palm
Jam}
8u!pund
u! wo
Pa 4 J
9T/S1 lelol
SHOD
MAI
*L:..
N91S30
03S2d
ST/bT 1e101
SNOJ
M/B
£T.s LOT
N91530
O3'8yd
1san6aa
Puni
!Elul
1saD
1�afold
1e101
dLLi
ON/S3A
WJl
3aOJ9
ap!11>afad
LuuaBy
O!
�
NsPeei Rots
(5000`T$) i 313AJ 341M31V1S - WVHDOIld NOLLV1110dSNVa13/U1JV
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM - MPO CYCLE 1 ($1,0000
State Funding
ID
Agency
Project Title
SCORE
TCM
YES/NO
�P
Total
Project
Total Fund
Request
PA&ED
DESIGN
21.113f13
R/W
CONS
Total 14/15
PA&ED
DESIGN
2015116
R/W
CONS
Total 15/16
Combined
Funding
Total
Federal
:Tptyl::
Stat9::
0527
Riverside Co
Clark St Sidewalk and Intersection
Safety Improvements
CTC Submittal
CTC Allocation
89.5
YES
RIV340838
721
721
: 2QQ:
:12/4004::
.2MZ 055::
200
;:;3C4
;:6 0.2::9:
::8)202015::060015:
• :;:OP
.:0* *:
521
721
::7]1:
0525
Riverside Co
Avenida Rambla Sidewalk Safety
Improvements
CTC Submittal
CTC Allocation
89.3
NO
RIV140839
356
356
=: 35
:4114004:
:.00S005:
:: :::$0:
::4(47J2015::
::0001.K
85
::2/1
41.09.16
0/2010
271
356
: 3i6:
0530
Riverside Co
Grapefruit Blvd/4th St Ped and
Roadway Safety Improvements
CTC Submittal
CTC Allocation
89.0
NO
RIV140840
2,300
2,300
.::144
S1/40034:
3%260R15:
143
287
8/24/2015
10/21/2015
10
1,860
4/1/2016
6/1/2016
2,157
2,300
2,157
:: ::14$
0517
Riverside
Iowa Ave and Martin Luther King Blvd
Bike Improvements85.0
CTC Submittal
CTC Allocation
YES
RIV140841
332
267
-
: ;267
:Q 0016
6/1/2016
267
267
- -
0571
Coachella
ATP Improvements
CTC Submittal
CTC Allocation
84.3
NO
RIV140842
1,764
1,764
:
' :4(Y7./201,%::
: ; 6]24/201 ::
100
1,60
4/.1/.2016
6/1/2016
1,664
1,764
::::1,7fj4_
0521
Riverside
Wells/Arlanza Sidewalk Improvement
CTC Submittal
CTC Allocation
81.3
YES
RIV140843
1,961
1,782
-
1;70
4f.10*
6J.1/26'1..
1,782
1,782
PO:
0522
Riverside
Norte Vista Sidewalk Imrpovement
CTC Submittal
CTC Allocation
79.0
YES
RIV340844
2,833
1,822
-
1,822
4/1/2016
6/1/2016
1,822
1,822
1,822
0534
WRCOG
Western Riverside County
Subregional Active Transportation
Plan
CTC Submittal
CTC Allocation
80.0
NO
SCAGATP_RP1
333
333
..
.i' 0..'27' `
:S Al 2Jlt
333
333
"
:::F0
0570
State Coastal
Conservancy
Santa Ana River Trail and Parkway
CTC Submittal
CTC Allocation
NO
SCAGATP_RP1
218
197
::;W.::•
::'•'•::::
:4/•1/.2016
.0/1001B
197
197
:::y97:
861
8,681
9,542 3,979 5563
9,542
AGENDA ITEM 12
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 12.
AGENDA ITEM 13
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 13.
r!IS~J~~X If (iell)dlf .:::.CT@ff) ) ,3 3247 Ramos Circle, Sacramento, CA 95827 www.qu1ncyeng.com Rubberized Asphalt Concrete the superior solution to your pavement needs CalRecycle ~ .,.T'i ~ .. RUBBERIZED ASPHALT CONCRETE •cost-effective •durable •safe •quiet •environmentally-friendly Printed on recycled paper
No Cost Rubberized Asphalt Concrete Training Available! Implementation of Rubberized Asphalt Concrete (RAC) projects may be challenging without the necessary skills and resources. To help you address these challenges and make your program a success, The California Department of Resources, Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) is teaming with our experts at Quincy Engineering to provide you with NO COST training sessions. Our team will be present to train and guide your staff throughout your RAC project. We will answer your questions about the engineering, construction and material testing activities associated with RAC. Workshops can be customized to specifically fit your questions as needed. Workshop topics include: How RAC is produced Overlay and chip seal design, specifications and estimates for RAC Mix designs Equipment needs Surface preparation Inspection and testing at the plant Inspection and testing at the site Traffic noise reduction CalRecycle has a number of grant programs available to jurisdictions interested in using rubberized asphalt concrete in paving projects-for the latest information on Rubberized Pavement Grant Program please visit httR://www.calrecycle.ca.,.9QY/TiresLGrants/PavemenJ/default.htm. Additionally, we encourage your jurisdiction to look into the RAC Cooperative Purchasing Program. By working with other jurisdictions, this program is designed to lower your bid prices through an "economies of scale" approach. Our project team is ready to help you learn more about RAC and how to both develop and implement a successful program. We can also provide assistance during construction -all at no cost to you. To learn more, please contact Theron Roschen, theronr@quincyeng.com or (916) 368-9181. felQUINCY llillllllll ENGINEERING 3247 Ramos Circle, Sacramento, CA 95827 Phone: (916) 368-9181 Fax: (916) 368-1308 www.quincyeng.com . -.-~ .. ! 11.1~£ \-CalRecycle ~ RUBBERIZED ASPHALT CONCRETE I'-' •• ........... ~-·· ··= ....... ··= =·· ··= =·· ··= =·· ··= =·· ··= =·· ··= =·· ··= =·· ··= =·· ··= =·· ··= =·· ··= =·· ··= =·· ··= =·· ··= =·· ··= =·· ··= Iii! !'ii
AGENDA ITEM 14
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 14.
I
.. A 6'e,Jd11 ITt?tn Jj
Fact Sheet for New Categorical Exclusions (CEs) under 23 CFR 771.117(c}, CEs Moved FROM the "d list'' TO the "c
list,'' and Programmatic Agreements for CEs -Effective November 5, 2014
Introduction: On October 6, 2014, the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration
(FTA) published a Final Rule in the Federal Register that amends 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 771.117 (and
771.118 for FTA) and takes effect November 5, 2014. The changes are as follows:
• Adds four new categorical exclusions (CEs) to the "c list."
• Moves 771.117(d)(l) through (d)(3) to the "c list" as (c)(26), (c)(27), and (c)(28) and adds 6 new
constraints to their use.
• Adds a new CE, (d)(13), to the "d list" to cover those situations in which the "moved" CEs do not qualify
under the "c list" due to the new constraints.
• Adds a new section on programmatic agreements between FHWA and State DOTs.
These changes were required by Section 1318 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21).
General Considerations:
• As with all CEs, consideration must be given to the following:
o Compliance with NEPA requirements related to connected actions and segmentation (i.e., the
project must have independent utility, connect logical termini when applicable and not restrict
further consideration of alternatives for other reasonably foreseeable transportation
improvements). (FHWA Final Rule, "Background," Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 8, January 13, 2014.)
o Compliance with all other federal and state statutes and regulations such as the Clean Water Act,
Section 4(f), Section 106, FESA, CESA, CEQA, etc.
o 23 CFR 771.117(a), which defines categorical exclusions as actions that:
• do not induce significant impacts to planned growth or land use for the area;
• do not require the relocation of significant numbers of people;
• do not have a significant impact on any natural, cultural, recreational, historic or other
resources;
• do not involve significant air, noise or water quality impacts;
• do not have significant impacts on travel patterns;
• or do not otherwise, either individually or cumulatively have any significant environmental
impacts.
o 23 CFR 771.117(b), which defines unusual circumstances as:
• significant environmental impacts;
• substantial controversy on environmental grounds;
• significant impacts on properties protected by Section 4(f) or Section 106;
• or inconsistencies with any federal, state, or local law, requirement, or administrative
determination relating to the environmental aspects of the action.
• As noted in Chapters 30 and 34 of the SER, a project description that describes the need, purpose,
location, limits, right-of-way requirements, and activities involved has been a longstanding requirement
on the Categorical Exemption/Categorical Exclusion (CE/CE) form. Additionally, the Categorical
Exclusion checklist (CE checklist) documents the project's eligibility for a categorical exclusion. The
checklist must be completed for each project and included in the project environmental file.
• As always, choose the CE best suited for the project.
10-30-2014 Page 1
Fact Sheet for New Categorical Exclusions (CEs) under 23 CFR 771.117(c), CEs Moved FROM the "d list'' TO the "c
list," and Programmatic Agreements for CEs -Effective November 5, 2014
Four New CEs:
• 771.117(c)(24): Localized geotechnical and other investigation to provide information for preliminary
design and for environmental analyses and permitting purposes, such as drilling test bores for soil sampling;
archeological investigations for archeology resources assessment or similar survey; and wetland surveys.
• 771.117(c)(25): Environmental restoration and pollution abatement actions to minimize or mitigate the
impacts of any existing transportation facility (including retrofitting and construction of stormwater
treatment systems to meet Federal and State requirements under sections 401 and 402 of the Federal
Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1341; 1342) carried out to address water pollution or environmental
degradation.
• 771.117(c)(29): Purchase, construction, replacement, or rehabilitation of ferry vessels (including
improvements to ferry vessel safety, navigation, and security systems) that would not require a change in
the function of the ferry terminals and can be accommodated by existing facilities or by new facilities which
themselves are within a CE.
• 771.117(c)(30): Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing ferry facilities that occupy substantially the
same geographic footprint, do not result in a change in their functional use, and do not result in a
substantial increase in the existing facility's capacity. Example actions include work on pedestrian and
vehicle transfer structures and associated utilities, buildings, and terminals.
CEs Moved from the "d List" to the "c List''
• 771.117(c)(26): Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, reconstruction,
adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (including parking, weaving, turning, and climbing lanes), if the
action meets the constraints in paragraph (e) of this section. [Note: Previously 771.117(d)(1).]
• 771.117(c)(27): Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects, including the installation of
ramp metering control devices and lighting, if the project meets the constraints in paragraph (e) of this
section. [Note: Previously 771.117(d)(2).]
• 771.117(c)(28): Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of grade
separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings, if the actions meet the constraints in paragraph
(e) of this section. [Note: Previously 771.117(d)(3).]
In moving these CEs from the "d list" to the "c list," a number of constraints were added in order for a project to
qualify for processing under 771.117(c}. Specifically, actions described in the new (c)(26), (c)(27), and (c)(28) MAY
NOT be processed as a CE if they involved ANY of the following (771.117(e)):
(1) An acquisition of more than a minor amount of right-of-wav1 or that would result in any residential or
nonresidential displacements;
1 The list of constraints is derived from a list originally established in FHWA's 1989 Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE)
Memorandum. This list was refined over time and in most State DOT's PCE agreements with FHWA, including California's 2003
PCE agreement, which defined a minor amount of right-of-way not more than ten (10) acres. Therefore, 10 acres should generally
be considered the maximum allowed under this CE. Additionally, each situation is unique and a "minor amount of right-of-way" will
be defined by the context of the acquisition. Acquiring 10 acres from a 100-acre parcel would likely qualify as a minor amount of
right-of-way. Acquiring 10 acres from a 12-acre parcel would likely NOT qualify as a minor amount of right-of-way.
10-30-2014 Page2
'
..
Fact Sleet for New Qllegorical Exdusions (CFs) under 23 a=R771.117(c), CFs Moved RUii the" d list" TO the" c
" list," and A"ogrammaticAgreements for CFs-Effective November 5, 2014
(2) An action that needs a bridge permit from the U.S O:>ast G.Jard, or an action that does not meet the
terms and conditions of a U.S Army O:>rpsof Engineers nationwide or general permit under section 404
of the Gean Water Ad. and/ or section 10 of the Rvers and Harbors Ad. of 1899;
(3) A finding of "adverse effect" to historic properties under the National Historic A"eservation Ad, the use
of a re&>urce protected under 23 U.SC 138 or 49 U.SC 303 (section 4(f)) except for actions resulting in
de mini mis impacts, or a finding of "may affect, likely to adversely affect" threatened or endangered
spedesor critical habitat under the Endangered ~es Ad.;
(4) O:>nstruction of temporary access, or the dosure of existing road, bridge, or ramps, that would result in
major traffic disruptions;
(5) Olangesin accesscontrol;
(6) A floodplain encroachment other than functionally dependent uses (e.g., bridges, wetlands) or actions
that facilitate open space use (e.g., recreational trails, bicyde and pedestrian paths); or construction
activities in, across or adjacent to a river component designated or proposed for indusion in the National
~stem of Wild and S::enic Rvers.
Detailed information regarding each of these constraints can be found in the Rnal R.lle.
If a project cannot be processed under (c)(26), (c)(27), or (c)(28), it may be processed under newly created (d)(13)
which reads:
771.117(d)(13): Ad.ions described in paragraphs(c)(26), (c)(27), and (c)(28) of this section that do not meet
the constraints in paragraph (e) of this section.
Rease note that if a NVVP 23 from the U. S Army O:>rps of Engineers is desired for the project, you will need to work
dosely with the project biologist. A pre-construction notification will be required under (c)(26), (c)(27), and (c)(28)
until the" moved" CFs have been approved as" c list" CFs by the US\CE Further, the new CCs--(c)(24), (c)(25),
(c)(29), and (c)(30}-will not qualify for a NVVP23 until the new CFshavebeen approved by US\CE
A"ogrammaticAgreements
The Rnal R.lle al&> added the ability for R-IWA and S:ate DOTs to enter into programmatic agreements allowing
S:ate DOTs to make CE determinations on R-1\NA's behalf. fosC:iltrans already makes such determinations under its
23 U~326 (CEAssignment) and 23 ~327 (NEPAAssignment) MOUs, C:iltransisnot pursuing programmatic
agreements at this time.
10-30-2014 Page 3
AGENDA ITEM ZS
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 15.
AGENDA ITEM id
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 16.