The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About07 July 20, 2015 Technical Advisory CommitteeTIME: DATE: LOCATION: PLEASE NOTE THE JULY 20 TAC MEETING WILL BE IN RIVERSIDE TECH N ICAL ADVISORY COM M ITTEE MEETING AGENDA 10:00 A.M. July 20,2015 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor Riverside, CA 9250L COMMITTEE MEMBERS George Alva rez, City of Eastvale Ahmad Ansari, City of Moreno Valley Armando Baldizzone, City of Blythe Beverly Barr-Ford, SunLine Tom Boyd, City of Riverside Bo Chen, City of Palm Desert John Corella, City of Cathedral City Ati Eskandari, City of Lake Elsinore Marcus Fuller, City of Palm Springs Tom Garcia, City of Temecula Vacant....... City of Rancho Mirage Jonathan Hoy, City of Coachella Tim Jonasson, City of LaQuinta Rohan Kuruppu, Riverside Transit Agency Bob Moehling, City of Murrieta Habib Motlagh, Cities of Canyon Lake, Hemet, P€rris, and San Jacinto - CHAIR Nelson Nelson, City of Corona Daniel Porras, City of Desert Hot Springs Patricia Roffio, County of Riverside Ken Seumalo, City of Indian Wells Jonathan Smith, City of Menifee Roy Stephenson, City of Jurupa Valley Ruthanne Taylor Berger, WRCOG Bill Thompson, City of Norco Michael Thornton, City of Calimesa Art Vela, City of Banning Tim Wassil, City of Indio Allyn Waggle, CVAG Kyle Warsinski, City of Beaumont Sean YeuhB, Caltrans District 8 Dan York, City of Wildomar Commission Staff Anne Mayer, Executive Director Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director COMM-TAC-00041 PLEASE NOTE THE JULY 20 TAC MEETING WILL BE IN RIVERSIDE TIME: DATE: LOCATION: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda. 10:00 A.M. July 20, 2015 Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor Riverside, CA 92501 In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and government Code Section 54954.2, if you need special assistance to participate in a Committee meeting, please contact the Riverside County Transportation Commission at (951) 787-7141. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to meeting time will assist staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility at the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Self -Introductions 3. Approval of May 18, 2015 Minutes 4. Public Comments (This is for comments on items not listed on agenda. Comments relating to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is before the Committee.) 5. Election of Vice Chair 6 2016 State Transportation Improvement Program Plan Update (Attachment) 7. Active Transportation Program Cycle 2 Update (Attachment) 8. RCTC Strategic Assessment (Attachment) 9. 2017 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (Attachment) 10. Federal Fiscal Year 2014/15 Obligation Report (Attachment) 11. Local Assistance Update (Verbal Presentation) 12. July Commission Meeting Highlights (Verbal Presentation) 13. Other Business Technical Advisory Committee Meeting July 20, 2015 Page 2 14. Adjournment (The next meeting will be September 21 in Riverside.) -AGENCY TAC J,Oj:JVJBER ,ART VELA f'~~ BANNING .1::~~rector o ublic Wo~ -------BEAUMONT KYLE WARSINSKI Development Services Director BLYTHE ARMANDO BALDIZZONE Director of Public Works CVAG CALIMESA MICHAEL THORNTON 1-11rr City Engineer CAL TRANS ISEANYEUNG ~" District Local Assistance Engineer I CANYON Y.AKE HABIB MOTLAGH • CHAIR 'ff City Engineer CATHEDRAr _ JOHN CORELLA City Engineer II I ------------COACHELL~ JONATHAN HOY c~ City Engineer I CORONAl NELSON NELSON Acting Public Works Director DESERT HOT DANIEL PORRAS SPRINGS Contract Assistant City Engineer TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE July 20, 2015 ALTERNATE PRINT NAME Holly Stuart Public Works Analyst -----·------···-----··--------/"l ... kc~~ffe/7 Allyn Waggle Deputy Director I Bob French Public Works Director Bill Simons Senior Engineer ,/ -------------------Maritza Martinez 'JbV\~tlt/\ Wuy Interim Public Works Director Rafael Martinez Principal Engineer Richard Kopecky Contract City Engineer SIGNATURE ---~~ I . ------·-----·---------------I -------I 1J1tr/{j~ --~--·----------·--------------~ --~ JD ·~r;(' --I J J -----v -EASTVALE iGEORGE ALVAREZ TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE July 20, 2015 Joe lndrawan 1 City Engineer HEMET---1~GH Cit · eer I ---·---------INDIAN WELLS KEN SEUMALO Bondie Baker r# Public Works Director Assistant Engineer II INDIO TIM WASSIL Tom Rafferty ------1 I Public Works Director Principal Civil Engineer I ------·-·--···-----·---------------------JURUPA VALLEY ROY STEPHENSON Public Works Director/City Engineer I --~--------------··--------------~---------t-----------·------------LA QUINTA TIMOTHY JONASSON Bryan McKinney ()....:-IL __ ;J __ Publ~ Works Direcior/City Engineer I Principal Engineer -~ -------------~---·--------·-· ---·-· --·-·------------· ----------------·----LAKE ELSINORE ATI ESKANDARI Rita Thompson Consultant Project Manager I ------·-·-· ------MENIFEE JONATHAN SMITH I Public Works Director/City Engineer I MORENO VALLEY AHMAD ANSARI Prem Kumar hZ-Public Works Director/City Engineer Deputy Public Works Director/ Assistant City Engineer ----··-----MURRIETA BOB MOEHLING Jeff Hitch ~ \Z~!\ City Engineer NORCO BILL THOMPSON Lori Askew Water and Sewer Manager Director of Public Works I ·--" ···--··-··---·-----· ---·------------·-·-· J~~~ -I; (A.-1 -----·---~€M Kl{ fW\,( ----·-·-- -PALM DESERT BO CHEN City Engineer PALM SPRINGS MARCUS FULLER -tt~' Assistant City Manager/City Engineer PERRIS HABIB MOTLAGH r 1 City Engineer I RTA -, ROHAN KURUPPU YU4~t w. ~lj!T/)-Ar<GE 1? vJ. 7:>1/lC-CTdL RIVERSlbL TOM BOYD Public Works Director RIVERSIDE COUNTY PATRICIA ROMO Assistant Director of Transportation -------SAN JACINTO v HABIB MOTLAGH I City Engineer I SUNLINE BEVERLY BARR-FORD Deputy Chief Administrative Officer ·--"----------------~---TEMECULA TOM GARCIA Public Work~tor "I '7 WILDOMAR DANYORf Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works/City Engineer --------·-WR COG RUTHANNE TAYLOR BERGER Deputy Executive Director TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE July 20, 2015 Mark Diercks Transportation Engineer 1c lmJ I Savat Khamphou --· --·---------·----------------------------·---···-~ +-------· ------··---------Bill Enos City Engineer --------Farshid Mohammadi Engineering Manager ----------····-Mojahed Salama I I ~~----·----~---------------Anita M. Petke Transit Planning Manager '... ... ---;f:---· -----Amer Attar _J-. _ .:,;;;-\ ~ ~ .. .. -----~ ·--------------· ---· ---------·---.r;.'f_t iw._J f'/k>.~~~ ----·---------I ----~/_ -------·-·--·--------Janet Morales Administrative Assistant -----------------·-·----------~ Donna Dean g'() Program Manager . AGENCY ---/2C77'( 1-f._b )<:__ ___ "' ____ --DC{VS0f\ S ~---------------TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE July 20, 2015 NAME TELEPHONE OR E-MAIL S,i_,, ll1r :;Gt___ /.5/ _u7-?Z-770? :ry -"P; ,,__J 7 1 '-1 -16 ~-S-G3CJ -----s~(g e_, ~·)flevo cl 7 bo -foo/-7711 !o ~ ?.....b -7 ?. .. JJ -l I S I ------------· --·-""" --qo\-Z.)~-~~l:.~ --------~°'~~~~----j ~::'l~~:,::~~o; ' I~ . 7C-,0-d.,5G-9:S-9 2 L7(;Q_-3'f3 ~3'j.L(; ~. JG<i3 ~----~~-nL.,,~~\-<J.c--.s.~--~~~ ~-____ .,\::c,._,_ __ ~ ~~~ -------------------------------------------·-------·----------------·----------------~---t--------------------------------------------------------------------~--r ------~ ·----·------------· ----~ -----------------------------------------··· ------------------------------------+ ---· -----------i MINUTES TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Monday, May 18, 2015 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was called to order at 10:01 a.m. at the Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA. 2. SELF -INTRODUCTIONS Members Present: Others Present: Amer Attar, City of Temecula Beverly Barr -Ford, SunLine Transit Agency Bo Chen, City of Palm Desert John Corella, City of Cathedral City Donna Dean, WRCOG Marcus Fuller, City of Palm Springs Bruce Harry, City of Rancho Mirage Jonathan Hoy, City of Coachella Prem Kumar, City of Moreno Valley Bob Moehling, City of Murrieta Farshid Mohammadi, City of Riverside Robert Morin, City of Corona Anite Petke, SunLine Transit Agency Michael Thornton, City of Calimesa Tim Wassil, City of Indio Mervin Acebo, Riverside Transit Agency Grace Alvarez, RCTC Brad Brophy, Cities of Canyon Lake, Hemet, Perris, and San Jacinto Alberto Vergel de Dios, Ca!trans Eric DeHate, RCTC Martha Durbin, RCTC Ernie Figueroa, Parsons Shirley Gooding, RCTC Aaron Hake, RCTC Eric Lewis, City of Moreno Valley Rafael Martinez, City of Menifee Shirley Medina, RCTC LoreIle Moe -Luna, RCTC Roy Null, County of Riverside Mojahed Salama, County of Riverside Serge Sinevod, Parsons Paul Sullivan, Parsons Ed Wimmer, City of La Quinta Technical Advisory Committee Meeting May 18, 2015 Page 2 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes were approved as submitted. Abstain: Tim Wassil 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. 5. SB 16 Aaron Hake, RCTC, explained SB 16 and stated this agenda contains proposed RCTC principles. 6. STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT Mr. Hake reported the Commission awarded a contract to HDR Engineering, Inc. to do a nine -month project to take a comprehensive look at Measure A, transportation funding and transportation policies, to determine where we are headed from a regional transportation perspective. Measure A ordinance requires RCTC to do an update of the expenditure plan every ten years. Shirley Medina, RCTC, said the results of the strategic assessment will help RCTC to move into the next cycle of the regional transportation plan sustainable communities' strategy 2020. 7. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Mr. Hake said SB 608 is similar to AB 5, the "Homeless Bill of Rights." He also said SB 516 is related to call boxes. 8. PRINCIPLES OF STATE TRANSPORTATION REVENUE This item was combined with Mr. Hake's presentation of his legislative update. 9. 2015/16 AND 2016/17 TUMF PROGRAMMING Shirley Medina provided her staff report that indicates the TUMF Regional Arterial subcommittee met to discuss the programming needs for FY 2015/16. She said there are two projects to program for a total of $7.6 million in TUMF Regional Arterial funds for the following two projects in FY 2015/16: County of Riverside: Van Buren Boulevard, Washing to Wood and City of Lake Elsinore: 1-15 Railroad Canyon Interchange (Roundabout) The City of Lake Elsinore is pursuing PS&E and R/W phases as soon as the environmental document is complete to continue the project's schedule and secure construction grant funding. The city is requesting programming a total of $4.6 million of TUMF Regional Arterial funds in FY 2015/16 for PS&E ($2.0 million) and R/W ($2.6 million). Technical Advisory Committee Meeting May 18, 2015 Page 3 M/S/C (Wassil/Mohammadi) to program a total of $4.6 million of TUMF Regional Arterial funds in FY 2015/16 for PS&E ($2.0 million) and R/W (2.6 million) 10. FY 2014/15 OBLIGATION PLAN Eric DeHate, RCTC, reported RCTC had great success in receiving $2,443,743 of August redistribution. He said the obligation plan attached to his staff report was submitted to Caltrans on April 7, 2015 and RCTC is anticipating obligating $56.5 million of CMAQ and STP funds this federal fiscal year. Currently, about $3 million of STP obligated thus far with another $5.4 million of STP and $4.1 million of CMAQ at the district now. He further reported the obligation plan segregates the obligations by multi -funding call for projects and CVAG's call for projects, STP call for projects, and miscellaneous grants awarded. RCTC will continue to monitor the progress of each project scored by readiness and compare that to the agreement dates. Ms. Medina stated there is over $50 million of obligations that will occur by the end of the federal fiscal year and only $3 million has been obligated to date. She requested the TAC to notify staff if they have any projects for which an RFA will not be submitted by August 1. Grace Alvarez, RCTC, said that in an effort to assist the local agencies, staff requested from Roy Null of the County Transportation Department, to provide sample request for authorizations (RFAs)for pavement rehabilitation and Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) to have available for local agencies that have limited experience processing federal -aid funded projects. 11. 2015 FTIP UPDATE Mr. DeHate reminded the TAC that in January staff announced the transition from the 2013 FTIP to the 2015 FTIP on December 15, 2014. Staff reported the 2015 FTIP included Amendment No. 2 to the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategies (RTP/SCS). In addition, Amendment numbers 1-3 were signed off by reviewing agencies. He said that since the approval of the 2015 FTIP, Formal Amendment No. 4 was submitted to SCAG on December 23, 2014, and finally approved on April 8, 2015, which included 28 projects. The placeholder RTP amendment numbers 15-99, now 15-11, is the consistency amendment to the 2015 FTIP. Currently, there are 10 projects — three local highway and seven state highway projects, reflecting modeling changes that were not incorporated with the 2016 RTP. This is anticipated to be approved concurrently with the 2016 RTP. Staff will contact the TAC about August to update the financial plan for this consistency amendment. This will be an opportunity to update cost estimates and programming in the 2015 FTIP. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting May 18, 2015 Page 4 12. TIGER CYCLE 7 — RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROJECT LIST Mr. DeHate reported that according to the US DOT website, $500 million is available for projects that are successful in competing for the funds. Pre -applications were due to the US DOT on May 4, 2015. As a result of Shirley Medina's request to agencies in Riverside County, RCTC received confirmation from four agencies that submitted a pre -applications by the deadline. Full applications will be due June 5, 2015. 13. ATP UPDATE — CYCLE 1 AND 2 STATUS LoreIle Moe -Luna, RCTC, reminded the TAC that allocation requests must be submitted two months in advance. She encouraged the TAC to work with the Local Assistance engineer assigned to their respective cities and to allow as much time as possible to be sure the allocations are approved. She also stated that for those who are submitting an application under for Cycle 2, the deadline is June 1. There are about 29 applications. She further stated that an email was sent to the TAC regarding Cycle 2 and if there are any agencies that have questions or need resources, staff will re -send the email that contains useful information. She recommended reading the application instructions carefully and submit the required documents to Caltrans timely and send RCTC an electronic copy of each application. The maximum file size is 10 MB. If larger than that, please put the application on a flash drive or CD and send it to her. Stephen Patchan, SCAG, also requested copies of the applications. Cycle 2 guidelines are also on the link at the bottom of her staff report. Shirley Medina reminded the TAC that there is a statewide pot and an MPO pot of funds; therefore, the applications go to the state where they are evaluated and the list of approved projects by the CTC will be approved. Following that, the CTC will provide the MPOs the projects that they didn't fund and SCAG will forward those to RCTC at which time RCTC will take another look at the projects and have an opportunity to apply 10 points to those projects consistent with the RTP/SCS. 14. MEASURE A FIVE-YEAR CIP SUBMITTAL UPDATE Grace Alvarez reported there were 21 submittals as of May 14. Staff is currently reviewing the submittals to take to the committee June 22 with Commission approval July 8. She asked that the remaining seven agencies submit their annual plans as soon as possible to allow staff to provide all submittals at one time. 15. LOCAL ASSISTANCE UPDATE Alberto Vergel de Dios, Caltrans, stated that the performance end date is a new directive impacting federally funded projects. It represents the expiration date for the federal funds obligated. How it will be implemented in still in discussion. Due to MAP 21, it is a delayed requirement. It is hoped it will be implemented by the next federal fiscal year (15/16). Technical Advisory Committee Meeting May 18, 2015 Page 5 He said HSIP Cycle 7 is a call for projects that is due July 31. It is about $150 million and there is no limit to the number of applications local agencies may submit. There is a $10 million limit for local agencies, per application and per agency. The Benefit/Cost analysis ratio has been revised from Cycle 6. The call amount for Cycle 6 was $150 million and about $20+ million for High Risk Rural Roads (HR3); approximately 389 applications were received with about 231 projects funded. Headquarters sent a letter regarding projects from previous HSIP cycles that RFA needs to be submitted by the end of September. Cycle 2 is for the end of December. DBE submittals are due June 30 for use for the next fiscal year. An office bulletin was issued September 28 last year stating Exhibit 9B or DBE methodology should be submitted included in the RFA package to Local Assistance. If an agency has a construction contract over $2 million or a consultant contract over half a million, it needs to be reviewed by headquarters. Local Labor Hiring Pilot Program was announced by the U.S. Department of Transportation in mid May 2015 that allows local or geographic -based hiring practices or economic -based hiring practices or hiring practices for veterans. It is intended for construction projects and must be advertised by March 5 of next year. It is a one-year program. You must submit Special Experimental Project No 14 (SEP 14), Attachment A, which is included in the letter from headquarters to the Local Assistance engineer then to headquarters for recommendation approval to FHWA, which will then approve it. Also included in the letter from headquarters is Attachment B, which is a list of general requirements. Updated Local Assistance staffing assignments for local agencies is attached to the Caltrans Local Assistance Update staff report prepared by Grace Alvarez. Web links to check for project status, E-76 status, and invoice reimbursement status are included in the staff report. He also talked about invoices/inactive list. He said Caltrans has one for RCTC member agencies, which he submitted May 18. The next cycle of inactives will be due August 20. There are two for RCTC member agencies. The most recent construction oversight information notice (COIN) says it is law, Civil Rights Act from 1964, that discrimination is prohibited. There was a compliance review done by Caltrans that highlighted the lack of awareness and lack of enforcement. 16. MAY COMMISSION MEETING HIGHLIGHTS Shirley Medina reported RCTC's 2015/16 budget was approved. RCTC also received approval for the Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Funds for the Perris Valley Line operating at $4 Million per year for the start up for five years. The Perris Valley Line is still scheduled to open December 2015. Aaron Hake presented his items to the Commission. There was a presentation from Caltrans on the 91 HOV project. A schedule delay to June 2016 is still expected. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting May 18, 2015 Page 6 17. OTHER BUSINESS In response to a question about the clean cities coalition regarding MSRC funding, Shirley Medina indicated there has not been a discussion but she will let the TAC know of recommendations made. Bruce Harry, city of Rancho Mirage, announced he is retiring July 10. Bill Enos will be the interim Public Works Director/City Engineer. Robert Morin, city of Corona, announced he is retiring June 30. Ralph Martinez will be his replacement. 18. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee, the meeting adjourned at approximately 11:05 a.m. Respectfully submitted, /r\d/;/,,A Shirley Medina Planning and Programming Director AGENDA ITEM 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 8, 2015 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: 2016 State Transportation Improvement Program Plan Update BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to approve the formula percentage distribution among the three geographic areas in Riverside County (Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley) based on taxable sales per the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Intracounty Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for purposes of preparing the 2016 STIP submittal. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The STIP is a five-year program of projects that is updated every two years outlining the commitment of transportation funds for highways, rail operations, mass transportation, and local roads with a new emphasis on bike and pedestrian facilities, also known as Active Transportation. In June of every odd year, Caltrans is required to prepare a draft STIP Fund Estimate (FE) that estimates how much funding will be available for programming over the next five-year period, Fiscal Years 2016-21. Since each STIP cycle adds on two years, the programming capacity is typically in the last two years. In August, the California Transportation Commission (CTC) is scheduled to adopt the FE along with guidelines on how regional agencies are to prepare the submittal. The 2016 STIP FE establishes funding levels for the STIP and also the State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP). STIP funds are allocated into two broad programs — the Regional Improvement Program (RIP) receives 75 percent of the total STIP funds, and the remaining 25 percent is directed to Caltrans for its Interregional Transportation Improvement Program (ITIP). The 75 percent RIP funding is further subdivided by formula into county shares. County shares are available solely for projects nominated by regional agencies. At the June 25, 2015 CTC meeting, CTC staff reported that the 2016 STIP Draft FE for statewide programming capacity is $30 million, which would be available in FY 2020/21. In addition, programming capacity is less than projected in the 2014 STIP. Therefore, with $30 million being a relatively insignificant amount and a 2014 STIP overprogramming issue in FY's 2016/17- Agenda Item 2018/19, the 2016 STIP cycle will provide zero new programming capacity and current projects would need to be reprogrammed to the outer years. Governor Brown's announcement of a Special Session of the State Legislature to address transportation maintenance funding may provide a solution to the funding limitations for road maintenance and future STIP cycles. CTC staff also reported at the June meeting that there is a possibility the adoption of the 2016 FE in August could be delayed based on the outcome of the Special Session. If the Special Session results in increased revenues for the 2016 STIP, a revised STIP FE will be determined including county shares for each region for programming purposes. STIP programming capacity for Riverside County has been as follows: STIP Cycle Amount 2000 $49,000,000 2002 $34,000,000 2004 $2,000,000 2006 $167,000,000 (Prop 1B STIP fund) 2008 $0 2010 $0 2012 $90,000,000 2014 $67,000,000 2016 ? The current 2014 STIP projects for Riverside County include the following preliminary engineering, right of way, and construction phases as follows: APPROVED 2014 STIP Agency Project Phase FY 2014/15 FY 2015/16 FY 2016/17 FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Total STIP Temecula I-15/French Valley IC Cons $41,545,000 $41,545,000 *Caltrans/RCTC SR-60 Truck Climbing/ Descending Lane ROW, Cons $32,105,000 32,105,000 *Caltrans/RCTC ** B Canyon Wildlife Crossing PE, ROW $500,000 $980,000 1,480,000 **County/Indio 1-10Jefferson IC Cons 33,310,000 33,310,000 *RCTC 1-215 SB connector Cons 8,975,000 8,975,000 **RCTC/CVAG PPM Cons 664,000 664,000 663,000 668,000 $668,000 3,327,000 *CVAG CV Link, Phase 1 Cons 2,000,000 2,000,000 Totals $34,474,000 $1,644,000 $32,768,000 $53,188,000 $668,000 $122,742,000 *New projects added in 2014 STIP cycle. Cons=Construction **Allocated in FY 2014/15 incl. B Canyon Wildlife Crossing PA/ED IC=Interchange and PPM. PA/ED=Project Approval/Environmental Document CVAG=Coachella Valley Association of Governments PE=Preliminary Engineering PPM=Planning, Programming, and Monitoring ROW=Right of Way Agenda Item STIP Intracountv Formula Per the Commission's STIP intracounty formula, STIP funds are allocated to Western County, Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley based on the most recent fiscal year taxable sales by geographic area data used for Measure A allocations. In addition, STIP guidelines allow up to five percent of funding for PPM activities. The Commission's policy is to set aside two percent for PPM. The geographic area percentages of taxable sales for 2011 used for the 2014 STIP compared to 2013 for the 2016 STIP are as follows: Geographic Area 2014 STIP 2016 STIP Western County 75.17% 75.76% Coachella Valley 24.12% 23.54% Palo Verde Valley 0.71% 0.70% Based on the above percentages for the 2016 STIP, the FE amount for Riverside County will be calculated in accordance with the following format with the Riverside County share to be determined upon adoption of the 2016 STIP FE: 2016 STIP Total Riverside County Share $ Less: 2% PPM ( ) Total New Project Programming $ Western County 75.76% $ Coachella Valley 23.54% $ Palo Verde Valley 00.70% $ 2016 STIP Proposed Project Programming Western Riverside County projects are nominated by Commission staff. Staff will review the projects remaining in the STIP and check the deliverability of the projects as programmed in the STIP. Recommendations for new projects for STIP funds will be based on consistency with Measure A and high priority projects approved by the Commission. As previously mentioned, the state's priorities have shifted to meet the goals established in SB 375, which is to reduce greenhouse gases according to targets set by the California Air Resources Board. Therefore, the STIP submittal should include a multimodal approach in the development of a program of projects. CVAG nominates its projects and notifies Commission staff for final concurrence and submittal to the CTC. Palo Verde Valley projects are nominated by the city of Blythe (Blythe); however, given the minor amount of funding and complexity in processing these funds, the Commission Agenda Item and Blythe have executed MOU's in past STIP cycles trading Palo Verde Valley STIP funds with Measure A Western Riverside County Highway funds. Staff will meet with Blythe to discuss applying the MOU for 2016 STIP funds. 2016 STIP Submittal The 2016 STIP submittal is due to the CTC on December 15, 2015, unless the schedule is revised. The submittal requires various forms and reports that will include the involvement of Caltrans, project sponsors and consultants, and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The CTC is scheduled to adopt the 2016 STIP in March 2016. To accommodate the above schedule, staff will present its recommendations for 2016 STIP programming at the September 9, 2015 Commission meeting, unless the FE is delayed by CTC. The proposed STIP projects will need to be submitted to SCAG by the end of September in order for SCAG to conduct performance measures analyses in accordance with STIP guidelines. There is no fiscal impact to the Commission. Agenda Item AGENDA ITEM 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 20, 2015 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: LoreIle Moe -Luna, Senior Management Analyst SUBJECT: Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 2 Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Call for Projects for Cycle 2 commenced on March 26, 2015 and applications were due June 1, 2015. A total of 31 applications from Riverside County were submitted, totaling nearly $47 million. Overall, statewide, there were a total of 617 applications submitted, totaling just over $1 billion. A total of $359 million is available from three years of funding under MAP-21 (Fiscal Years 2016/17 — 2018/19) for three years of programming. Pursuant to state and federal statutes, the funds must be distributed on a statewide, large Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO), and small urban and rural basis as shown in the table below. Funding Distribution Category $179.5 50% Statewide $143.6 40% Large MPOs (population > 200,000) $35.9 10% Small Urban/Rural areas (population < 200,000) $359.0 100% Total A minimum of 25% of the funds must benefit disadvantaged communities. Up to 3% may be set aside to fund active transportation plans in predominantly disadvantaged communities. Applicants have two rounds of opportunities, statewide and at the MPO level, to be awarded. As part of the sequential project selection, projects are first evaluated statewide and those that are not ranked high enough are automatically provided a second opportunity for funding through the large MPO share. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), as this region's MPO, will allow Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPAs) such as RCTC to review the applications submitted to the state from Riverside County and add up to 10 points. The full 10 points will be awarded for projects that are consistent with bicycle and pedestrian plans adopted by local and regional governments. SCAG expects to receive the same level of funding as the first cycle, which translates to approximately $9 million, or 12%, proportioned for Riverside County. Applications are currently being evaluated statewide and recommended awards are anticipated to be approved by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) in September 2015. Large MPO awards are scheduled to be approved by the CTC in December 2015. Resources: Cycle 2 Guidelines — http://www.catc.ca.gov/programs/ATP/2015/Final%20Adopted%202015%20ATP%20Guidelines.pdf Cycle 2 Application Instructions — http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/atp/cycle-2.html AGENDA ITEM 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 20, 2015 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Aaron Hake, Government Relations Manager Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Manager SUBJECT: Strategic Assessment STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive input from the Technical Advisory Committee for RCTC's Strategic Assessment. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: I The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) seeks candid input from City/County/Tribal Managers and Public Works Directors in Riverside County regarding their transportation vision(s) for the next 10-20 years of growth. RCTC is conducting a countywide "Strategic Assessment" of transportation priorities, needs, and funding in order to position the region to achieve its economic and quality of life goals. As one can see from driving local freeways, RCTC has made significant progress on delivering major projects included in Measure A, approved by voters in 2002. Although these projects are providing great benefits to local communities, significant mobility needs and desires remain among the public and elected officials — ranging from new highways, new rail lines, wider freeways, etc. that are unfunded. The RCTC Strategic Assessment will strive to match public priorities with data -driven needs and financial realities for the next 10 and 20 years of Measure A. The Strategic Assessment recommendations will be presented to the RCTC Commission in January 2016. A critical component of this analysis is the input of local government executives and technical experts such as members of the TAC. RCTC seeks to understand: • Transportation priorities within each jurisdiction; • Regional perspectives of jurisdictions; • How each jurisdiction views the role of RCTC in facilitating local priorities; • Local resource constraints; and • Local political dynamics that impact meeting mobility goals. Achieving meaningful feedback from the TAC is essential in preparing the RCTC Commission to make informed decisions about Riverside County's transportation priorities for the next decade (or two). The TAC's feedback will be integrated with input received from the CVAG TAC, a series of four countywide stakeholder summits to be held in September, and a statistically -valid public opinion telephone survey of 800 respondents. Please thoughtfully complete the attached survey and return to RCTC at the TAC meeting. RCTC staff and its consultant, HDR Engineering, Inc., will facilitate a group conversation on the questions raised in the attached survey. RCTC is grateful in advance for the TAC's contribution to formulating Riverside County's transportation vision and strategy. Attachment: Strategic Assessment Survey RCTC Strategic Assessment Task 6 — Outreach to Public Agency Partners Survey Questions for RCTC TAC 1. Which city do you work for? (optional) 2. Is a high, medium, or low priority for your jurisdiction? High Medium Low Active Transportation A Improving walk and bike routes to schools B Creating bike lanes on existing city streets and building new separated off-street bike paths C Connecting and building regional recreation trails for hiking and walking Major Highways D Widening congested highways in the county E Widening highways by building toll lanes for drivers to use if they choose F Building entirely new highways in the county G Expanding older interchanges on major highways Arterial Roads and Local Streets H Fixing potholes and resurfacing roads I Widening congested arterial roads in the county J Building entirely new arterial roads in the county K Building roadway underpasses or overpasses to reduce traffic backup at train track crossings Rail and Transit L Expanding paratransit and specialized transit services M Expanding public transit bus services N Increasing Metrolink frequency and providing more service in both directions Expanding Metrolink and Amtrak rail services to new areas of Riverside County Other P Building charging stations for electric vehicles Q Expanding commuter ridesharing programs R Providing freeway tow -truck service to quickly clear accidents S Preserving habitat for endangered species from new transportation projects 3. Is a high, medium, or low priority for Riverside County as a region? 4, High Medium Low Active Transportation A Improving walk and bike routes to schools B Creating bike lanes on existing city streets and building new separated off-street bike paths C Connecting regional recreation trails for hiking and walking Major Highways D Widening congested highways in the county E Widening highways by building toll lanes for drivers to use if they choose F Building entirely new highways in the county G Expanding older interchanges on major highways Arterial Roads and Local Streets H Fixing potholes and resurfacing roads I Widening congested arterial roads in the county J Building entirely new arterial roads in the county K Building roadway underpasses or overpasses to reduce traffic backup at train track crossings Rail and Transit L Expanding paratransit and specialized transit services M Expanding public transit bus services N Increasing Metrolink frequency and providing more service in both directions Expanding Metrolink and Amtrak rail services to new areas of Riverside County Other P Building charging stations for electric vehicles Q Expanding commuter ridesharing programs R Providing freeway tow -truck service to quickly clear accidents S Preserving habitat for endangered species from new transportation projects 5. Which one project category is the top priority for meeting your jurisdiction's future transportation needs? 6. Is there adequate funding available for your jurisdiction's top priority project category (in Question 5)? Yes No 7. Which one project category should be the top priority for meeting Riverside County's future transportation needs? 8. Do you believe new revenue is needed to fund the top priority projects in your jurisdiction and throughout Riverside County, or do you believe that existing funding can be reprioritized to meet these needs, or both? New Revenue Needed Can Reprioritize Existing Funds 9. What is the best strategy (besides getting new sources of funding) that could help your jurisdiction achieve its transportation goals? 10. Describe the #1 goal of your jurisdiction (in any aspect) for the next 10-20 years 11. What is the best strategy (besides getting new sources of funding) that could help Riverside County achieve its transportation goals? AGENDA ITEM 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 20, 2015 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager SUBJECT: Draft 2017 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Guidelines STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Draft 2017 Federal Transportation Improvement (FTIP) Guidelines were released by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) on June 25, 2015. Some of the major changes in the 2017 FTIP include: • STIP Submittals - Performance Measures per 2012 RTP/SCS • Changes to Federal Congestion Management Process (CMP) requirements • Addition of ATP The STIP submittals require some performance measures that this year will be performed by SCAG on behalf of the county Commissions, analyzing the proposed STIP projects in accordance with the 2012 RTP/SCS. Changes to the CMP requirement is what RCTC is most concerned with as the process implements 23 CFR Part 450.320(d) and states no federal funds will be programmed for any project that significantly increases Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) capacity unless the project is addressed as part of a congestion management process. Exclusions to this regulation include safety improvements, operational improvements or bottlenecks. Currently, SCAG utilizes a threshold of $50 million project cost to distinguish between significant and non -significant SOV capacity -increasing projects for the purposes of CMP review. For the 2017 FTIP, the $50 million threshold will no longer be applicable. SCAG worked closely with FHWA to comply with the requirements and determined that any SOV capacity increasing project that adds at a minimum one mile or more in length and is federally funded meets criteria for CMP review. All FTIP submissions for significant SOV capacity increasing projects that are at least one mile in length and above, whether on the local highway or state highway, that are federally -funded must include documentation that demonstrates Transportation Demand Management or other operational management strategies were considered and incorporated into the project. Transportation Demand Management/Transportation System Management (TDM/TSM) alternatives are typically included in the air quality and/or traffic studies. Project sponsors need to include reference to this section. If TDM/TSM is not included in the project, a statement of overriding considerations will need to be provided, for example: Statement of overriding consideration (or statement of clarification why consideration of other alternatives were irrelevant, infeasible or impractical or any combination of these alternatives for the project. This would apply mostly to relatively small, but significant arterial widening projects that are clearly not safety or operational improvement projects for which appropriate and adequate AA documentation may not exist. An example of such a project would be arterial widening 1 to 2 miles in length in a rural area where there may not be any opportunities for transit or bikeway alternatives due to lack of connectivity to an existing network). If the environmental document is not complete at the time of the FTIP submittal, the project sponsor may provide other planning reports such as alternative analysis, project study report, etc. that documents TDM/TSM alternatives were considered and/or incorporated into the project. There will be instances when projects are programmed with no preliminary work done, therefore, no documentation can be provided. Under this situation, such projects will be programmed with Preliminary Engineering (PE) only — no right-of-way or construction funds will be programmed. There will be projects that are initially programmed with local funds and then the opportunity opens up for programming federal funds, which will trigger compliance with the CMP. As soon as the project is programmed with federal funds, the Commissions will be required to provide CMP information and submit the environmental documentation in the amendment or FTIP update where the federal funds are programmed. The CMP requirements will apply to the first four years (constrained years) of the 2017 FTIP (2016/17 through 2019/20). The ATP section is merely the incorporation of the new funding category for ATP (federal and state sources), and programming of statewide and MPO projects in the 2017 FTIP. Staff will be working on the notifications to our member agencies regarding the upcoming 2017 FTIP process and submittal requirements in the upcoming months. The 2017 FTIP update submittal to RCTC is October 15, 2015. Attachment A: Excerpt from Caltrans annotated outline for environmental documents Attachment B:2017 FTIP submittal and adoption Schedule ATTACHMENT A Outline of Alternatives Section (excerpt from Caltrans annotated outline for environmental documents) 1. Project Alternatives a. Build alternatives should include a range of reasonable alternatives (see heading below) that could meet the purpose and need of the project. Once a preferred alternative has been identified, it should be listed before the other alternatives under consideration. If there is more than one build alternative and criteria for alternative selection have been identified, list those here. Use the following headings to cover the topic: i. Common Design Features of the Build Alternatives ii. Unique Features of Build Alternatives (use separate subheadings for each build alternative) iii. Include Transportation Demand Management (TDM), Transportation System Management (TSM), and Mass Transit alternatives: • TDM Alternative (to be considered on all proposed major highway projects in urban areas over 200,000 population) • TSM Alternative (usually only relevant in urban areas over 200,000 population) • Mass Transit Alternative (to be considered on all proposed major highway projects in urban areas over 200,000 population) b. No -Build (No -Action) Alternative —the no -build analysis must discuss both the existing conditions and what would reasonably be expected to occur in the foreseeable future if the project was not approved. 2. Comparison of Alternatives 3. Identification of a Preferred Alternative (include in the final document) 4. Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Discussion Attachment B DRAFT FTIP FY 2016/17 — 2021/22 GUIDELINES July 2015 II. SCHEDULES AND SUBMITTALS A. Schedules BASED ON OCTOBER 1, 2016 DUE DATE TO STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES Adoption Schedule for the FY2017 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (Schedule subject to change) September 30, 2015 County Transportation Commissions submit 2016 STIP/RTIP program to SCAG for Evaluation of system performance and Cost-effectiveness of the RTIP October 8, 2015 Draft of 2017 FTIP Guidelines November 2015 Final 2017 FTIP Guidelines December 10, 2015 County Transportation Commissions submit 2016 STIP/ RTIP to California Transportation Commission and copy to SCAG January 5, 2016 DEADLINE — COUNTY TIP SUBMITTAL TO SCAG January 6 thru April 29, 2016 SCAG staff, working with Caltrans and County Commissions, will analyze County TIPs. 1. Analyze projects for consistency with RTP/SCS 2. Identification of Modeled Projects 3. Transportation Conformity Analysis 4. Programmatic Analysis February 22 thru April 29, 2016 Modeling Activities March 1, 2016 DEADLINE - Financial Plan Board Resolution submittal to SCAG May 2, 2016 Modeling Report due to FTIP Section May 3 thru May 26, 2016 Final draft write up May 31 thru June 9, 2016 Management Review Period June 13, 2016 Draft 2017 FTIP sent out for reproduction June 2016 Presentation of 2017 FTIP to AB 1246 CEOs Committee to fulfill AB1246 requirement July 7, 2016 Draft FTIP presented to policy committees -- Transportation Committee Energy and Environment Committee July 2016 30-day public review period and public hearings August 2016 Note: SCAG's Policy Committees and Board are dark in August SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ' ASSOCIATION Of GOVERNMENTS 25 DRAFT FTIP FY 2016/17 — 2021/22 GUIDELINES July 2015 September 1, 2016 Draft FTIP due to Caltrans September 1, 2016 FTIP Adoption -- Policy Committees and Regional Council Action September 6, 2016 Adopted 2017 FTIP transmitted to state and federal agencies and upload to CTIPS database October 1, 2016 Adopted FTIP formally due to State and Federal Agencies November 2016 Caltrans transmits 2017 FSTIP to Federal Agencies December 2016 Conformity Determination on 2017 FTIP by Federal Agencies 2016 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) NEW REQUIREMENT FOR 2016 STIP — County Transportation Commissions submit STIP-RTIP program to SCAG for regional -level analysis for performance and cost-effectiveness NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 A copy of the County Transportation Commission's draft STIP must be transmitted to SCAG's FTIP section at the same time it is sent to the California Transportation Commission. June 2015 Draft Fund Estimate due to the California Transportation Commission August 26-27, 2015 California Transportation Commission Adopts the Fund Estimate (2016 STIP Fund Estimate) September 30, 2015 County Transportation Commissions submit STIP program to SCAG for regional -level analysis for system performance and cost-effectiveness December 9-10, 2015 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) due to the California Transportation Commission April 2016 California Transportation Commission adopts the STIP and submits to the Legislature 2017 TIP DATABASE AVAILABILITY The 2017 TIP Database will be available in October 2015. The data will include all federally approved administrative modifications and amendments. 90 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA y ASSOCIATION Of GOVERNMENTS 26 AGENDA ITEM 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: July 20, 2015 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Eric DeHate, Staff Analyst Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director SUBJECT: Revised Obligation Delivery Plan — FFY 2014/15 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: As you may recall on May 18, 2015, RCTC reported to the TAC that the delivery rate this year was extremely low. Approximately $3.3 million of CMAQ and $3.6 million of STP funds have been obligated thus far. Additionally, there is $1.4 million of CMAQ and $4.8 million of STP funds at Local Assistance District 8 pending review for obligation in FFY 14/15. RCTC is still intending to obligate $35.3 million of CMAQ and STP funds in FFY 14/15. Under this revised scenario, RCTC can lend out $8 million of OA to another county. The revised FFY 2014/15 obligation delivery plan is included as an attachment to this report. The report segregated the planned obligations based on the Multi -Funding Call for Projects Award of January 8, 2014, the 2013 Surface Transportation Program Pavement Rehabilitation Awards of 2013, CVAG's CMAQ Call for Projects Awards, one remaining project from the Transportation Enhancement Program, and Miscellaneous Grants. There are two Requests for Authorization (RFA) Columns in the spreadsheet to track the delivery delays and/or adjusted RFA schedules. Please take a look at the RFA schedules and notify me if there are any changes to delivery schedules. Since most of the projects come from a competitive process and points were awarded to the projects based on project readiness, RCTC decided to include in the comment section of the spreadsheet the agreement number, the project phase that is funded, and the anticipated start of the project phase based on the executed agreements. RCTC will continue to monitor the progress of the project delivery to use as perhaps a new scoring category for future call for projects. RCTC would like to reiterate its Planning and Programming staff is available to assist you with the processing of the RFA and to help you navigate through the federal -aid process. Attachment: Revised FFY 2014/15 Obligation Plan RIVERSIDE COUNTY- FFY 2014/2015 OBLIGATION PLAN �•*,__. a..,a. i.n s.ew.r+.c40•1. Agency FTIP ID Project Location Project Scope/Description KVA Juom. to Caltrans D-8 (Originally Purposed) KVA auom. to Caltrans D-8 (Newly Projected) CMAQ STP-L Funding Phase Project Phase FTIP Funding Year Comments Calimesa RIV060116 I-10/Cherry Valley IC PA&ED 1/1/2015 6/30/2015 $ 443,000 Eng PA&ED Y Agmt 14-/2-111-uu- envvanmentaJ funded phase with federal obligation Jan 2015. As of 7/2/15: RFA for PA&ED submitted on 6/17/15. Coachella RIV151217 Ave 48 from Jackson to Van Buren Street Widening 11/1/2014 12/1/2015 $ 2,278,000 Con Pre PA&ED FY 15/16 Agmt 14-/1-14/-UU Cons funded phase with a start of cons Jan 2015; As of 5/20/2015, RFA date pushed out to 12/1/2015. Eastvale RIV151201 Hamner Ave Hamner Ave Signal Synchronization 11/1/2014 5/18/2015 $ 142,150 Con PA&ED Y raynn c - -ccc - L.1.710l JUrTLICLI phase with a start date of March 2015 (CMAQ and MSRC funding). As of 7/2/2015 NEPA and R/W Cert secured. RFA submitted to Caltrans on 6/18/2015. Palm Desert RIV071243 Free rt - Fred Waring/111 Reconfigure Right Turn 10/3/2014 5/23/2015 $ 531,000 Con Con Y ,..m.aa{wn w. rm..0 ucwr- 2008. Funding reprog to FY 2014/15 in 2015 FTIP A-4. As of 4/28/2015 RFA at Local Assistance. At District 8. As of 6/23/2015 awaiting environmental revalidation Rancho Mirage RIV140814 Bob Hope Dr and Dinah Shore Dr 4 ft high sand fencing 12/1/2014 6/1/2015 $ 101,000 PA&ED Pre PA&ED Y CVAG'S CMAQ Call for Projects Award 2014. As of 6/22/2015 - Resubmitted RFA to Caltrans District 8 on 6/1/2015 Rancho Mirage RIV140815 Ramon Rd and Dinah Shore Dr Pork Chop Island, pole replacement and relocation and 4 ft high sand fencing 12/1/2014 6/1/2015 $ 204,000 PA&ED Pre PA&ED Y CVAG'S CMAQ Call for Projects Award 2014. As of 6/22/2015 - Resubmitted RFA to Cakrans District 8 on 6/1/2015 Rancho Mirage RIV110130 Monterey Ave. SB Widening- Dinah Shore to Gerald Ford Widening Road and Improvements 1/1/2015 12/30/2015 $ 850,000 Con PS&E Y Prior Call for Projects Award. As of 5/19/2015: still in R/W. RFA date moved from 6/30/2015 to 12/30/2015 Riverside RIV151206 SR 91 Lime to Mulberry Pedestrian Bridge 7/17/2014 12/1/2015 $ 638,000 Eng Pre PA&ED Y Agmt 14-72-127-00 Environmental funded phase with May 2014 schedule. Secured FPN. As of 2/24/2015: RFA delayed due to PSR required.Project will be pushed into FFY 15/16 Riverside RIV131202 Adams St at 911C PA&ED 7/17/2014 12/1/2015 $ 935,000 Eng Pre PA&ED Y Agmt 14-/1-14b-UU environmental funded schedule May 2014. As of 2/24/2015: RFA delayed due to PSR required. Riverside _RIV151209 -- 4 Locations Bike Lockers for last mile share 10/1/2014 7/31/2015 $ 240,000 Con PA&ED Y Agmt 14-/2-1.50-UU Lens funded phase with start of cons June 2015. As of 6/18/2015: Revised RFA date to July 31, 2015. Riverside RIV151215 Bruce Street Sidewalks 10/1/2014 11/1/2015 $ 195,000 Con PA&ED Y Agmt 14-72-131-00 Cons funded phase with start of cons Sept 2015. FPN secured. July 13, 2015 Agency FFIP ID Project Location Project Scope/Description t<tii Juom. io Caltrans D-8 (Originally Purposed) t<rw auom. io Caltrans D-8 (Newly Projected) CMAO STP-L Funding Phase Project Phase FTIP Funding Year Comments Riverside RIV151205 Magnolia Ave from First Street to Buchanan Signal Synchronization 1/2/2015 2/1/2016 $ 1,012,500 Con Pre PA&ED FY 15/16 Multi -funding Call for Projects Award. EPSP - Need Concurrence from SLAG. As of 2/24/2015: RFA date revised to 2/1/2016 Temecula RIV62029 Park and Ride Facility Park and Ride Facility 9/1/2014 7/9/2015 $ 1,300,750 Con PS&E Y .....,.... ,., �.,, .,....,,,,,,,,,,,. r,,.,,. with start of cons Jan 2015 As of 4/29/2015, RFA delayed from 4/30/2015 to 6/30/2015 due to environmental issues. As of 7/2/2015 RFA to be submitted by end of next week Temecula RIV62031 I-15/SR-79 IC IC Project 11/1/2014 10/30/2015 $ 12,976,000 Con R/W FY 15/16 As of 4/29/2015, RFA delayed from 4/30/2015 to 6/30/2015 due to environmental issues Wildomar RIV151213 Grand Ave Bike Lanes Bike Lanes 9/1/2014 2/1/2016 $ 614,000 Con Pre PA&ED Y Agmt 14-/L-13b-U0 tons funded With start of Con March 2015. As of 7/1/2015 PES to be submitted by 7/17/2015 Wildomar RIV151214 Grand Ave Bike Lanes Bike Lanes Ph II 9/1/2015 2/1/2016 $ 747,000 Con N Agmt 14-/L-13/HHl tons unwell witn start of Con March 2016. As of 7/1/2015 PES to be submitted by 7/17/2015 ,� TT EL, Banning RIV130401 Ramsey St. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 10/1/2014 12/1/2015 $ 182,000 Con Pre PA&ED y As of 7/2/2015 - PES Comments will delay project RFA Blythe RIV130402 N. Broadway Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 11/1/2014 10/30/2015 $ 150,000 Con Con Y RFA date was 4/10/2015, now delayed due to environmental issues Coachella RIV130402 Grapefruit Blvd. Pavement Rehabilitation/Reconstruction Pavement Rehab 10/3/2014 9/15/2015 $ 215,000 Con PA&ED Y rrry request ma oy w a/«/all. As or 2/24/2015: City submitted updated PES on 2/4/2015. As of 6/11/2015, delays in environmental will push RFA date to 9/15/2015 Corona RIV130401 Ontario Ave Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 10/1/2014 12/1/2015 $ 832,000 Con PA&ED Y As of 4/29/201S - RFA submitted to Caltrans. At District 8. PES still needs to be submitted Indian Wells RIV130402 Cook Street Rubberized Overlay Pavement Rehab 11/1/2014 4/15/2016 $ 135,000 Con Pre PA&ED Y 12/16/14 - KS start of cons is July -Aug 2015. La Quinta RIV130402 Washington St. Improvements Pavement Rehab 7/15/2014 3/13/2015 $ 250,000 Con Con Y As of 4/29/2015 - RFA submitted on 3/13/2015. At District 8 Lake Elsinore RIV130401 Gunnerson St. Pavement Rehabilitation Pavement Rehab 11/15/2014 7/2/2015 $ 286,000 Con Con Y As of 6/30/2015: Submit RFA by 7/2/2015 Moreno Valley RIV130401 Frederick St. and Elsworth St. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 8/1/2014 5/16/2015 $ 1,084,000 Con Con Y As of 6/22/2015 - Re -submitted RFA to Caltrans District 8 on 6/16/2015 Murrieta RIV130401 Jefferson Ave. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 10/1/2014 7/9/2015 $ 593,000 Con Con Y As of 6/22/2015 - R/W cert to be signed on 7/7/2015 and submitted with RFA on 7/9/2015. Palm Desert RIV130402 Portola Ave. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 10/3/2014 5/23/2015 $ 336,000 Con Con Y NEPA and R/W completed. As of 6/23/2015 RFA comments being addressed with Local Assistance. Palm Springs RIV130402 Ramon Rd. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 10/30/2014 5/25/2015 $ 396,000 Con Con Y As of 6/25/2015 - RFA RFA comments being addressed with Local Assistance. Rancho Mirage RIV130402 Old Hwy 111 Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 4/8/2015 3/31/2016 $ 162,000 Con ROW Cert Y As of 2/23/2015: Received NEPA CE. RFA anticipated date for summer 2015. As of 7/2/2015, environmental delays to push project to summer 2016 July 13, 2015 Agency FiIP ID 7ro;ect Leta:ion Project Scope/Description KrJa DUDm. I Caltrans D-8 (Originally Purposed) rcrH Duom. l o Caltrans D-8 (Newly Projected) CMAQ STP-L Funding Phase Project Phase FTIP Funding Year Comments Riverside RIV130401 Indiana Ave. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 6/27/2014 4/27/2015 $ 1,810,000 Con Con Y As of 4/27/2015 RFA at Local Assistance. At District 8 Held up by approval of OAP As of 7/1/2015 CLAP finally approved and RFA submitted to HQ. - Temecula RIV130401 Winchester Rd. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 9/1/2014 7/31/2015 $ 646,000 Con PA&ED Y As it4/29/21)15, RFA-delayed from 4/30/2015 to 6/30/2015 due to environmental issues. Revised RFA date to July 31, 2015. Corona RIV041047 Magnolia & El Camino Ave TE project 10/1/2014 6/22/2015 $ 943,000 Con PA&ED Y As of 3/4/2015: RFA date in Summer 2015. TOTAL RCFC PVL Operations/Maintenance Rail operations/maintenance 8/1/2015 20,000,000 Con Con Operating Assistance for the Perris Valley Line Caltrans RIV010212 SR91 HOV Gap Closure HOV Lanes 4/1/2015 $ 6,197,100 Cons Cons on- going FY 14/15 Post programming obligation to cover cons capital and cons support shortfall RCFC RIV010212 SR91 HOV Gap Closure HOV Lanes 4/1/2015 $ (6,197,100) Util Rel Util Rel on- going FY 14/15 De -obligation of tunds per latest utility relocation estimate; deobligation approved 5/8/15. OP - Totals $ 26,168,400 $ 25,059,000 51,227,400 RFA subm review FY 2014/15 Oblizations as of 5/11/2015 Riverside County RIV110302 1-10 in the City of Blythe New W/B on and off ramps 10/1/2014 11/3/2014 $ 810,000 Con Con Y STPLN-5956(240). Obligated 3-13-2015 Wildomar RIV130401 Clinton Keith Rd Slurry Seal Pavement Rehab 6/30/2014 8/14/2014 $ 135,984 Con Con Y STPL-5484(006). Obligated 3-9-2015 Eastvale RIV130401 Schleisman Ave. Pavement Rehab Pavement Rehab 7/17/2014 6/30/2014 $ 199,000 Con ROW Cert Y STPL-5486(002) - Obligated 12/19/2014 RCTC RIV041047 Downtown Station Improvements Transit Station Improvements 11/14/2014 $ 1,485,526 Con Con FY 12/13 STPL-6054(0474) - Obligated 12/5/2014 Reverse EPSP. Cathedral City RIV130402 East Palm Canyon Dr. Rehab Pavement Rehab 2/12/2014 10/23/2014 $ 336,680 Con Con FY 13/14 STPL-5430(032) - Obligated 12/19/2014 (EPSP). Indio RIV130402 Old Hwy 111 Pavement Reconstruction Pavement Rehab 1/7/2015 4/10/2015 $ 477,295 Con Con Y STPL-5275(026) Old Hwy lii/Rubidoux/Arabia RFA CON approval Sunline RIV140821 Eastern Coachella Valley Vanpool Pilot Program 7/3/2015 4/1/2015 $ 1,762,000 Con Pre PA&ED Y CVAG s (-MALL Call for Projects Award 2014. Flex Transfer subm to LA D8 4/1/15; FTA transfer approved 5/12/15. Sunline RIV140822 Desert Hot Springs to Palm Desert New Bus Service 7/3/2015 4/1/2015 $ 1,536,000 Con Pre PA&ED Y (NA(' 5 LMAQ Call for Projects Award 2014. Flex Transfer subm to LA D8 4/1/15; FTA transfer approved 5/12/15. Desert Hot Springs RIV130402 Hacienda Ave & Mission Lakes Blvd. Surface Rehab Pavement Rehab 9/1/2014 3/13/2015 $ 182,000 Con Con Y RFA submittal to LA D8 3/19/2015; obligation approved 6/8/15 $ 3,298,000 3,626,485 July 13, 2015 AGENDA ITEM ZZ A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 11. AGENDA ITEM 12 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 12.