Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout05 May 15, 2017 Technical Advisory CommitteeTECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE  MEETING AGENDA  Commission Staff  Anne Mayer, Executive Director  Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director  TIME:10:00 A.M.   DATE:May 15, 2017  LOCATION:  Riverside County Transportation Commission  4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor, Conference Room A  Riverside, CA 92501  COMMITTEE MEMBERS  Ahmad Ansari, City of Moreno Valley Bob Moehling, City of Murrieta  Armando Baldizzone, City of Blythe Farshid Mohammadi, City of Riverside – VICE CHAIR  Chad Blais, City of Norco Habib Motlagh, Cities of Perris and   Bo Chen, City of Palm Desert  San Jacinto ‐ CHAIR  K. George Colangeli, PVVTA Nelson Nelson, City of Corona  John Corella, City of Cathedral City Aaron Palmer, City of Canyon Lake  Brad Fagrell, City of Lake Elsinore Daniel Porras, City of Desert Hot Springs  Marcus Fuller, City of Palm Springs Patricia Romo, County of Riverside  Christopher Gray, WRCOG Mark Sambito, City of Rancho Mirage  Jonathan Hoy, City of Coachella   Ken Seumalo, City of Indian Wells – CHAIR   Joe Indrawan, City of Eastvale Jonathan Smith, City of Menifee  Amer Jakher, City of Beaumont   Patrick Thomas, City of Temecula  Tim Jonasson, City of LaQuinta Michael Thornton, City of Calimesa  Rohan Kuruppu, Riverside Transit Agency Art Vela, City of Banning  Vacant, City of Hemet Timothy T. Wassil, City of Indio  Steve Loriso, City of Jurupa Valley Sean Yeung, Caltrans District 8  Martin Magana, CVAG Dan York, City of Wildomar  COMM-TAC-00057   RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION  TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA*    *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda.    TIME:    10:00 A.M.  (PLEASE NOTE TIME CHANGE)    DATE:    May 15, 2017    LOCATION:  Riverside County Transportation Commission     4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor     Riverside, CA 92501  In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Government Code Section 54954.2, and the Federal Transit Administration Title VI, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787‐7141 if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, including accessibility and translation services. Assistance is provided free of charge. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting time will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide assistance at the meeting.       1. Call to Order    2. Self‐Introductions    3. Approval of March 20, 2017 and January 23, 2017 Minutes    4. Public Comments (This is for comments on items not listed on agenda.  Comments relating  to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is before the Committee.)    5. SCAG ATP Go Human Encouragement Campaign Presentation – SCAG Staff (Attachment)    6. Legislative Update (Attachment)    7. Active Transportation Program (ATP) Update (Verbal Presentation)    8. Caltrans Local Assistance Update (Verbal Presentation)    9. Federal Obligation Plan Update (Attachment)    10. 2017 FTIP Update (Attachment)    11. SB 821 Update (Verbal Presentation)    12. May Commission Highlights (Verbal Presentation)        Technical Advisory Committee Meeting  May 15, 2017  Page 2    13. Other Announcements  TAC meetings at RCTC will commence at 10:00.    At CVAG, meetings will commence at 10:30.    14. Other Business    15. Adjournment   (The next meeting will be July 17, CVAG Board Room, Palm Desert at 10:30 a.m.)   aaaui6u3 Ella loaaluoa kpecloN paayoi aa6aueN sNaoM o!lgnd' SVIIHOd 131Nda SONIHdS lOH .1 13S30 0 g--v) 1,1/ 0/ 0 ,i p y yt, . ve,i j X Z27/2 A j' 2 7" 'IfFuzee aaaui6u3 aquas spun aaaui6u3 Allapoloaala s)1a0M oilgnd NOS13N NOS13N VNOH03 imago gaoM oilgnd wPelul zaupelAi azliaalAl aaaui6u3 Ella AOH NVH1dN0r - - b1131-13b03 Q9%).1 ai '1W) �OM*,r •3 VI )n 2,0 em© aaaui6u aoiva S suow!S 110 aaaui6u �( i 3 0 `d113H03 NHOr Jll13 inia3H1d0 3NV1 NOANd3 .bo . 0 '.10, (9 V ,) 'LP/05 ---- j/:\ ,.......... 5- aL a/ 42 'g a u g a ` ,' 79 e,,,1 `i!' +,. Jeau!6u3 eouelspsv pool a si a ONn3A Nd3S SNVI11b0 P totA r7) Cast, "44. 1401 , ...L.t [4aoloaaia sVoM oilgnd youaa3 qo8 aaauOu3 Ella NO1NIJOH1 13VH3IW `dS30111d3 4.404e/0010G-0141144 � �- 1 'd UV 9)0V-1 0 Ill W uoilalaodsuaal jo aoloaaia VNVOVIN N1121dW OVAO svoM oggnd jo aoloaaia 3NOzzI0ib8 OONtfauv 314JJl18 aa6auavl ilia wpalul a6allafl-sgq 0 •W ulagazi13 aaaui6u3 40poloaaia s)aoM o!Ignd N3H�iVr HMV 1NOWnd38 lsAlauy svoM oilgnd penis AlloH svoM gignd to aoloaaia 6uiloy d13A 121d ONINNbB lIVIN3 pue 321n1VN.JIS 31AWN 1N1Nd 311/N21311V ?n8W311U 3d1. A3N3Jd NI NOIS 3SV31d LIOZ `S6 AVIA' 331111NIA100 AtIOSIAaV 7VOINH331 sawlga Jamas pue aaleM uosdwoyl II!8 aoioaa!a svoM o!Ignd swig adHa03210N S!f''131 � aa6eueiAl uogonAsuoa svoM ogind yo1!H liar aaau!6u3 o! eal Apope6eueW uo!sinia uoRepodsueal spec op3 aaauOu3 ONI11-130141 SOS aaauOu3 Al!Opopaw] s)poM o!lgnd INVSNd adWHV uuAl0 8n81S d131tItif1W A311dn ON3210W aaau!6u3 Ainpoloaala s)laoM o!Ignd 1-11101S NVH1dNOr 33JIN3W 1144 pp.AS crww7)35 aa6eueW Apo iugs!ssy uosdwn uoser neuOu3 ledpupd aawgm paeMp3 aaau!6u3 Apo isvoM ogind aopaala ul!wS w!r aaauOu3 l!n!o ledpupd Now op3 II aaau!6u3 luels!ssy Je le8 e!puo8 aaaul6u3 113NOVA VMS 3MONIS13 3NV1 aaeu!6u3 Apopopaa!a sVoM o!Ignd NOSSVNOr AH1014111 dlN I no d� aaau!6u3 Apo /imago sN-I0M o!ignd Alndea OSINO1 3n31S A311dnddntinr aoioaga s)laoM o!Ignd lISSVM1J11-1101111 aopaa!a svoM ogind 211d1-10 - oivuun3S N3N OIam S113M NVIaNI Gvi. 4-.19 ) ran 13W3H q-tut-jrLY1 nneyspei8 6ieio N`dM1'MaNI 30f 3ldn1Sd3 31:1f11VNJIS 31AIVN 1NINd 31dN?3 311d 1:1381N3W 3d.l AON3Jd NI NOIS 3S1131d LIAM `S6 AVIN 331.1.11NINO3 ANOSIAaV 1VOINH03.1 A At, Imfo iiiiaeA`d v,,,,, _ Joioana svoM oggnd wua;ul S`dWOHl 131211b'd `d1f133W31 _ ,-- — -la b' Ja6eueW Buiuueld 'Usuall aN;ad .W el!uy 3NIlNf1S D� �g '01 '�,��°sQ V'Q Jaaui6u3 AinAin'j HJ`dllOW 818dH OlNIo`df N`dS eweieg payefow uogepodsueil jo npaaia Tueisissy OW021 `dlORll`dd AlN1100 341S213nR1 -� vAi1? �1 imaaid s)PoM oilgnd zaupeW sub{ 211b'H0 30IA - Ia`dWWb'HOW aIHSa`dA I 341S213AI21 401,, , Kipv,14.4ifyv e 5/-77p h., ',_, _I ✓V.� 1r, �Z vt,„ Jeauou3 Ain sou3 II0 svoM oilgnd lo Joloana 0119Wb'S N21`dW i 39b'1JI141 01-13N`d8 ? j �. lswioadS 6uiwwei6ald pue 6wuueld pisuisaeM ugsu>{ flddfl2lflN NdH021 `d121 4,1(),n �' 9 / �`�'�'� �Q''� � �aaw6u3 �i� HJ`dllOW 818bH SII1213d spiouAaa ales Ja6eueW lama° ijsuall I13JN`d103 3021030 'N I b'1Md • A/71) /1j. 5 )14-41,f4 noyd�,ey�lens��s aaaui6u3 A}iOpa6eueW AiiO luelsissy a3i1nd snoaew sONiads weed � -1 /- f In a �- JaawBu3 uoge}�odsue�l s �aai W �I A ve aaaui6u3 An N3H0 09 1213S34 Wldd IIVW3 pug 321f11dNJIS 3WVN 1NRId 31HN21311V 21381N3W 3Vl AON3JH NI NOIS 3S14/31c1 LIOZ `S6 AVIN 33111ININO0 AIJOSIAalf 7VOINH331 ' vro y 7 o tlit 0/6 /09jj 1,,,)771 fl 7 . --,(:.:.' .....„ :, - , , - -s, '-: / , _ -, - ,.., - - ) 't it 1 (7, _ , , ,,,-, ..,-,, ± - , ---,,,,.. 7.....,- - 1 - r,;) ":- - --D-1 (1, '.7) \-" ) NI-Lr:,-, ' — - - ;) ---, ( - ATVI i 0 61/1P , , air91/1(19 IPA01111 r7.1i-z ........... ja,,,..„,/...1 epiinukt /7"ri C'*. )411-).,...„-, tr.?. fis-0-1,:. -7-7 , „, -, ) I-7 1, 1 \/) a +,11 17 ) 1 C , ,)_<;)--frfoe.) 11/41 -, ,,1 : (4.k. ,1 ( I b I 1,111: \ 2 Ki 4 . V 1 u - 1) ,) - 4,43 i,t, __---- - ____--- sp\INJ8c-7- -v-111 1.,/ 07, '&41/42 (vcie,)Q1 nti A , ---Int"ViSt irvd, 41 r 04 '41 4 regyil leeD ge 1.9,--4/4.-) _ ......_ ..„....._,„.._,,,„.....,....._ ....,.,‘....,,_,....__________,..,._..,......,,.. ,_„,„,..,.,.,.....„.,..„.. ..., _ - .. )/ ,) ...." - , — ..,...,,. ,----e, ,r ,) I Li? III, 1,44,17,-1,79 . .fr_ 57,4j r-,-) 0-1 ,----, (-; , ""-', t ...) 17..., r..., , , "e.t_1i_A ,,,,A.i..0 At ,--7) -.. ...A 0 I. f, (7)),1 '"1e -)0L ,, ..) )\ i Da llauuee lleiAl JeauOu3 Anisvom oticind Jo npaqape6euelAl Al!O luels!ssV NNOA NVCI tpalocnim lir Ja6eueiAi wekoid 6uazi spqo uoRepodsueii jo Joioaija AY80 213HdOISINHO 003HM lIVIN3 Pue 3Hf1IVNOIS 3INVN ININd 31VNI:1311V H3131N3IN °V.I. A3N3OV NI NOIS 3SV37c1 LIMZ AVIN 331111/111A103 AHOSIAaV 1VOINH031 MINUTES TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Monday, March 20, 2017 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (ROTC) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was called to order by Chair Ken Seumalo at 10:30 a.m. at the Coachella Valley Association of Governments, 73710 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260. 2. SELF -INTRODUCTIONS Members Present: Others Present: Amer Attar, City of Temecula Linda Bazmi, City of Corona Christopher Gray, WRCOG Tim Jonasson, City of La Quinta Eric Lewis, City of Moreno Valley Steve Loriso, City of Jurupa Valley Martin Magana, CVAG Anita Petke, SunLine Transit Agency Mojahed Salama, County of Riverside Mark Sambito, City of Rancho Mirage Ken Seumalo, City of Indian Wells Bill Simons, City of Cathedral City Timothy T. Wassil, City of Indio Sean Yeung, Caltrans Dan York, City of Wildomar Kwasi Agyakwa, Caltrans Grace Alvarez, RCTC Brad Brophy, Tri-Lake Consultants Andy Cheah, Transystems Cresencio Garcia, Caltrans Shirley Gooding, RCTC Mike Heath, City of Calimesa Martha Masters, RCTC Shirley Medina, RCTC Lorelle Moe -Luna, RCTC Jason Pack, Fehr & Peers Paul Rodriguez, Rodriguez Consulting Group John Standiford, RCTC Sarah Syed, SunLine Transit Agency Russell Williams, County of Riverside Technical Advisory Committee Meeting March 20, 2017 Page 2 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Due to lack of a quorum, approval of the January 23, 2017 minutes was deferred to the next meeting. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. 5. RIVTAM MODEL PRESENTATION BY CHRIS GRAY, WRCOG Christopher Gray, WRCOG, provided a PowerPoint presentation about the proposed RIVTAM Update and requested input from the Coachella Valley cities and/or CVAG interest in joining RIVTAM Update. Chris provided a brief history of RIVTAM, which was last updated in 2009, as well as the contributors and/or parties who participated in the update that included WRCOG, Riverside County, and RCTC. There was interest by La Quinta to join in the RIVTAM update. CVAG recently updated the model used during the latest Transportation Project Prioritization Study (TPPS) and did not see a need to participate in updating the RIVTAM model. Some of the Coachella Valley cities asked that the inquiry/request to join the RIVTAM Update go to the CVAG Committees for consideration since the RIVTAM model is a countywide model. 6. REGIONAL TRUCK STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A REGIONAL LOGISTICS MITIGATION FEE John Standiford, RCTC, made a presentation to the TAC on the Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of a Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee. Mr. Standiford stated that RCTC filed suit in September 2015 and again in February 2016 to challenge the EIR in order to ensure adequate mitigation to address added truck traffic impacts created by the World Logistics Center. A settlement was reached in which Highland Fairview (World Logistics Center developer), Moreno Valley, Riverside County, and RCTC, each must contribute $250,000 for a study to evaluate a regional logistics fee. The Commission approved the award of the contract to WSP Parsons Brinkerhoff in January 2017. Staff will return to the TAC to seek input and involvement from interested members of the study and report on the progress. 7. SB 821 ANNOUNCEMENT Martha Masters, RCTC, reminded the TAC about the upcoming deadlines for SB 821 submittals for the biennial call for projects 2017/18. Martha also asked for volunteers to score the SB 821 applications and clarified that volunteers would have to be agency representatives who are not applying for SB 821 funding this cycle. 8. 2013 multi -funding call for projects update savings Grace Alvarez, RCTC, provided an update on the progress made on the 2013 Multi -Funding Call for Projects, which included federal CMAQ, STP, Western County Measure A Regional Arterial, and MSRC Technical Advisory Committee Meeting March 20, 2017 Page 3 funds. Of the original 33 projects approved for funding, 18 projects have been obligated with Commission funding participation of $90 million (61 percent of the funding available through the call) and 14 projects remaining to be obligated with funding of $58 Million (39 percent of the funding available through the call). Grace also reminded the TAC about the terms of the agreements that include definition of the project, project milestones, and agreement clause about project savings. She encouraged the TAC to continue working on obligating the remaining projects and communicating any project savings to RCTC to make the proportionality savings calculations during contract award. Dan York, city of Wildomar, requested the process in the event there are project cost increases. Ms. Alvarez responded that cost increases will be on the local agencies per language included in the current funding agreement. She further explained that the main reason for enforcing the project savings proportionality was due to the fact that RCTC programmed funding in excess of the anticipated apportionments/revenues for the Multi -Funding Call for Projects and that the savings were needed to balance the over programming. 9. CALTRANS LOCAL ASSISTANCE UPDATE AND 10. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LOCAL ASSISTANCE MANAGEMENT MEETING Sean Yeung, Caltrans, provided an update on the following Local Assistance topics: a. SCLAMM meeting scheduled for March 29 in San Bernardino b. Inactive List c. CWA Cycle 14 notifications going out to local agencies that requested time extensions. Extensions for Cycle 14 are good until April 2019 for final invoicing with unutilized funds lapsing in June 2019. 11. MEASURE A CIP FY 2017/18 — FY 2021/22 Lorelle Moe -Luna, RCTC, reminded the local agencies about the upcoming submittal deadlines of May 8, 2017 for Measure A CIPs and provided a copy of the notification sent out in early February 2017. She offered assistance to the local agencies that have new staff responsible for the submittals. 12. OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business presented. 13. MARCH COMMISSION HIGHLIGHTS John Standiford provided an update about the 91 CIP Express Lanes opening on Monday. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting March 20, 2017 Page 4 Shirley Medina, RCTC, updated the TAC on the Commission's approvals for the Scope of Work Change for Salt Creek Multi -Modal Trail and for the reprogramming of CMAQ funds for the city of Riverside from the SR-91 Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge to the Magnolia Avenue Traffic Signal Interconnect. 14. OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS Tim Wassil, city of Indio, suggested a CVAG outreach to encourage Coachella Valley cities attendance at TAC meetings. 15. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee, the meeting adjourned at approximately 11:30 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Shirley Medina Planning and Programming Director AGENDA ITEM 5 Southern California Active Transportation Safety & Encouragement Campaign Spring 2017 Regional Context Go Human SoCal Rising AT Injuries and Fatalities Obesity, Physical Inactivity a Public Health Crisis Growing Demand 40+% interested in bicycling Transformation of streets underway $1b in AT investment by 2020 Campaign Objectives •Reduce collisions, create safer streets •Increase rates of active transportation •Reduce greenhouse gases •Improve public health •Support ATP and other active transportation investments •Change the reputation of the region Target Audience* Primary: Adult Drivers ages 25-54 Secondary: Pedestrians & Bicyclists English & Spanish Message* Key Actions: •Be cautious (particularly at intersections) •Watch for people walking and biking •Ride with traffic Strategy Focus on “hotspots” in each county* “Point of Engagement” strategy •Bus Ads, Billboards •Radio •Digital & Social Media (static and animated GIFs) Be provocative, not frightening “Humanize” others*Informed by analysis of crash data in “hot- spots.” Advertising Campaign Advertising Campaign: (NEW) Driver Ads Advertising Campaign: (NEW) Driver Ads Advertising Campaign: Driver Ads Advertising Campaign: Pedestrian & Bicyclist Ads Ads in the Community Ads in the Community Campaign Accomplishments •400+ million total estimated impressions •40+ of earned media pieces •100+ agency partners •National Association of Government Communicators awards for logo and poster design Evaluation Results* The brand and messaging are memorable & motivating: •Over 20% recognized the ads •Over 80% found the ads to be motivating * Quantitative survey of 615 drivers from across the SCAG region Keys to Success: Partnerships Keys to Success: Partnerships Advertising Campaign Toolkits/ Toolbox Open Streets & Pop Up Projects Campaign Components Open Streets Events & Pop Up Projects Riverside County Event Partners: •Palm Desert (May 2016) Vision San Pablo •Riverside (June 1, 2017) Sustainability Planning Grant Partners: •City of San Jacinto •City of Wildomar •City of Hemet •City of Lake Elsinore Join Us! May 2017 Advertising Campaign •All materials are open-source & available for co-branding. Printing resources available. Digital Resources •Web banners in English & Spanish •Flyers & postcards with encouragement facts and safety tips in multiple languages available Interested City Partners: •City Avalon •City of Laguna Beach •City of Carson •City of Santa Ana •City of Wildomar •City of Eastvale •And more! •City of Jurupa Valley •City of Signal Hill •City of Villa Park •City of Culver City •City of Imperial •City of West Hollywood •City of Pasadena Thank You! Julia Lippe-Klein Assistant Planner, Active Transportation & Special Programs Lippe-klein@scag.ca.gov AGENDA ITEM 6 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION  DATE: May 15, 2017  TO: Technical Advisory Committee  FROM: Jillian Guizado, Senior Legislative Affairs Analyst  Aaron Hake, External Affairs Director  SUBJECT: State and Federal Legislative Update      STAFF RECOMMENDATION:    Receive and file.    BACKGROUND INFORMATION:    State Update    On March 30, 2017, Governor Brown reappointed Joe Tavaglione to the California Transportation  Commission (CTC).  He is one of nine CTC members appointed by the Governor.  Commissioner  Tavaglione has been instrumental in the success of critical transportation infrastructure projects,  including the State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project, the 60/91/215 interchange, the  Colton Crossing, and numerous others.    SB 1 (Beall), ACA 5 (Assembly Member Frazier and Senator Newman), SB 132 (Committee on  Budget and Fiscal Review), SB 496 (Cannella), SB 130 (Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review)    SB 1 was passed by both houses on April 6, 2017 and signed by Governor Brown on April 28,  2017.  Also known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, SB 1 estimates over the  next 10 years $26.575 billion will be allocated to local agencies and $25.895 billion will be  allocated within the state for transportation purposes.  In addition, it sets preliminary  performance outcomes for state highway investments to ensure the existing transportation  system is brought into a state of good repair.    In conjunction with SB 1, the state legislature passed ACA 5, SB 132, and SB 496.  ACA 5 is a  constitutional amendment that will go before the voters in November 2018 to lockbox the  revenues raised in SB 1.  SB 496 removes the duty for design professionals to defend public  agencies against claims, except those arising out of negligence, recklessness, or willful  misconduct on the part of the design professional.  SB 132 appropriates funds from the Fiscal  Year 2016‐17 budget for particular transportation projects, including: $100 million for the  Merced Campus Parkway Project and $400 million for the Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) train  extension to Ceres and Merced.  Additionally, SB 132 creates the Riverside County Transportation  Efficiency Corridor and allocates $427,172,000 for five projects in northwest Riverside County:  91 Express Lanes Toll Connector to Interstate 15 North, Hamner Avenue Bridge Widening,  McKinley Street Grade Separation, Jurupa Road Grade Separation, and Interstate 15/Limonite  Avenue Interchange.  The Riverside County‐specific funds are available until June 30, 2023, and  require the Secretary of Transportation to convene a taskforce to accelerate delivery of the listed  projects.  Separately, SB 130 is moving through the legislature and would restore vehicle license  fee revenues to the four newest cities in Riverside County: Eastvale, Jurupa Valley, Wildomar,  and Menifee.    Revenues raised by SB 1 come from the following sources:     12 cent gasoline excise tax increase and annual adjustment for inflation (starting  November 2017)   Resets price‐based excise tax on gasoline and annual adjustment for inflation (starting  July 2019)   Transportation improvement fee on registered vehicles ‐ ranges from $25 ‐ $175  depending on vehicle value (starting Spring 2018)   20 cent diesel excise tax increase and annual adjustment for inflation (starting November  2017)   4 percent increase on diesel sales tax (starting November 2017)   $100 vehicle registration fee on zero emission vehicles (starting July 2020)   $706 million Transportation Congestion Relief Program (TCRP) loan repayments    Local Streets and Roads (LSR) and State Transit Assistance (STA) funds to Riverside County are  anticipated to be $38.7 million annually and $15 million annually respectively, attached.   Additionally, Caltrans District 8 will receive approximately $226 million annually for the  State Highway Operations and Protection Program (SHOPP) and the Commission will have  $4.7 million annually to program in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).   Metrolink may receive approximately $4 million annually for the next three years.  The statewide  Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) program will receive $25 million annually of which the Commission  expects to receive approximately $1.2 million annually.    The rest of the funds available under SB 1 are expected to be distributed on a competitive basis.   These funds include:   Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) at $273 million annually;   Active Transportation Program (ATP) at $100 million annually;   Trade Corridor Enhancement Account (TCEA) at $300 million annually;   State and Local Partnership Program (SLPP) at $200 million annually; and   Congested Corridor Program (CCP) at $250 million annually.    AB 28 (Frazier)    This bill was signed by the Governor and is considered to be part of the transportation package  authorized under SB 1.  AB 28 reauthorizes National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Assignment  that allows Caltrans, on behalf of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), to approve that  certain NEPA requirements are met.      AB 1189 (Garcia)    The Commission’s sponsored bill, AB 1189 (Garcia), received only a single referral in the Assembly  and is a non‐fiscal bill, which means the bill will require fewer hearings and sets up a potentially  efficient path through the Legislature.  AB 1189 was referred to the Assembly Committee on Local  Government and was heard and passed on April 5.  The bill passed off the Assembly Floor on April  20.  Next, it will go to the Senate Rules Committee.  The Coachella Valley Association of  Governments, Riverside Transit Agency, Western Riverside Council of Governments, Self Help  Counties Coalition, Mobility 21, and HNTB have provided letters of support.  In addition, the  California State Council of Laborers went on the record as supporting the bill.  The only opposition  received to date is by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association.    AB 91 (Cervantes)    This bill would require Caltrans to convert all existing high‐occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes in  Riverside County to operate only during hours of heavy commuter traffic; during all other times  the lanes would be open to all vehicles, including those with a single occupant.  In addition, any  new HOV lane would be required to operate under the same requirements.  After May 1, 2019,  Caltrans could reinstate the HOV lanes in Riverside County to operate with occupancy  requirements 24 hours a day after reporting to the Transportation Committees the effect the  conversions had on safety and traffic.  This bill specifies these conditions would not apply to  existing toll lanes.    As prior Assembly Committee on Transportation analyses accurately point out, HOV lanes  constructed using federal funds must not result in new air quality violations or worsen existing  violations.  If the HOV lanes in Riverside County are converted to part‐time, it could result in the  Commission having to repay federal funds or the region having to propose and construct a new  project that would meet or exceed the air quality improvements originally proposed by the HOV  projects.  The committee analysis further points out that part‐time HOV facilities in Northern  California are common due to the region’s dramatic unidirectional peak period traffic patterns;  Southern California has more hours of peak period traffic that is bidirectional.    AB 408 (Chen)    This bill would require the Commission to pay a property owner’s litigation expenses in eminent  domain proceedings if the Commission’s offer to the property owner is lower than 90 percent of  the compensation awarded after an eminent domain jury trial.  Furthermore, the bill would give  the court the option to require the Commission to pay the property owner’s litigation expenses  if the Commission’s offer to the property owner is between 90 percent and 100 percent of the  compensation awarded in an eminent domain jury trial.  Based on input from our right‐of‐way  attorney, staff believes this bill would harm the Commission’s ability to successfully settle its  eminent domain suits without going all the way to trial.  AB 408 has since died, but because of  the adverse impact the Commission expected from AB 408, the Commission still adopted an  oppose position so that swift action can be taken if a similar bill resurfaces this session.   AB 1523 (Obernolte)    AB 1523 would allow the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority to use the design‐build  procurement and project delivery method for local agencies to reconstruct the Mt. Vernon  Avenue Viaduct.    SB 150 (Allen)    This bill would amend the process for setting regional greenhouse gas (GHG) emission targets  under SB 375 (Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008), which sets a framework for regions to reduce  greenhouse gas emissions through the adoption of a sustainable communities strategy (SCS) as  part of the regional transportation plan (RTP) process through a bottom‐up approach.  The  intention of the SCS is to identify strategies that each metropolitan planning organization (MPO)  is to implement as a means of reducing GHG emissions through coordination of transportation,  land use, and planning, with regional targets set for 2020 and 2035.  This process is done  regionally in a holistic manner that balances various regional priorities, rather than by a strict  project‐by‐project analysis.  The GHG emission reductions identified are then used to meet  statewide emission reduction goals set forth under AB 32 (Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006).    Under the process defined by SB 375, regional GHG emission reduction targets are to be set by  the California Air Resources Board (CARB) through information gathered by a Regional Targets  Advisory Committee composed of a variety of transportation and environmental stakeholders  and through consultation with the MPOs and air districts.  No specified metric to reduce  emissions was mandated under SB 375.  The targets are to be updated by the CARB every eight  years.    SB 150 would amend this process by requiring the CARB, in updating the targets, to also take into  account additional state GHG emission reduction goals, including those in SB 32 (Chapter 249,  Statutes of 2016), which set the statewide goal of reducing GHG emissions 40 percent by 2030.   In addition, the bill further specifies that these targets are to be set using the latest available  climate science and the reductions are to be met through reductions in vehicle miles traveled  (VMT) and criteria air pollutants.  By specifying VMT, this changes the focus from overall GHG  reductions to a blended focus that includes VMT reductions.  The CARB would be required to  hold two additional public hearings as it revises the GHG targets.    Under SB 150, each SCS would have to include an appendix that outlines the region’s planning  and programming activities to prioritize projects for programming that reduce VMT and maximize  co‐benefits, including public health, social equity, and conservation.  Criteria to be considered in  prioritizing projects are to include but not be limited to: 1) a reduction in per capita carbon  dioxide emissions from cars and light trucks, 2) a reduction in VMT by 15 percent by cars and light  trucks by 2050, 3) an increase in the average daily time spent walking or bicycling for  transportation purposes, and 4) a decrease in the share of low‐income or lower middle‐income  residents’ household income consumed by transportation and housing.  Beginning in 2018, the  CARB would be required to monitor each MPO’s SCS or alternative planning strategy (APS) and  prepare a report to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) assessing whether each  region is on track to reducing VMT 15 percent by 2050.  This report is to be provided every four  years thereafter.      The Southern California Associated Governments (SCAG) and the county transportation  commissions in its region, including the Commission, have spent significant resources developing  a RTP and SCS that meet the targets assigned by the CARB.  Staff believes SB 150 is unneeded  due to the region’s continued demonstration of being committed to meeting statewide air quality  goals.  SB 150 presents significant changes to how projects would be programmed and  implemented in the region, specifically targeting the authority county transportation  commissions in the SCAG region have over this programming and planning process.  In addition,  by adjusting the reporting period to occur every four years, it is unclear how this would inform  the region’s reaching of its reduction goals due to the length of time it often takes for emission  reductions to result from large transportation capital investments.    SB 477 (Cannella)    This bill allows for the expansion of intercity passenger rail service beyond the boundaries of  three existing joint powers authorities (JPAs) that currently operate intercity rail service.  Current  law establishes the Los Angeles‐San Diego‐San Luis Obispo (LOSSAN) JPA and authorizes the state  to contract with the JPA to operate the popular Pacific Surfliner Amtrak route.  The Commission  is a member agency of the LOSSAN JPA.  This bill would provide the opportunity for the future  Coachella Valley‐San Gorgonio Pass rail corridor to be operated by LOSSAN.  While the  governance of the Coachella Valley‐San Gorgonio Pass rail corridor service has not been fully  vetted at this point in time, SB 1197 creates an opportunity that could be utilized in the future if  it is determined by the Commission and the other LOSSAN member agencies it is best to  incorporate the new corridor into the existing JPA, rather than creating a new agency or allowing  Caltrans Division of Rail to operate this rail service.  The bill is authored by Members of the  Legislature from Central and Northern California who are seeking to expand the reach of intercity  rail in that part of the state.  Staff believes this bill has potential future benefits to Inland Southern  California as well.    Federal Update    On May 5, President Trump signed a $1 trillion funding bill to keep the federal government  operating through September 2017.  The bill fully appropriates the FY 2017 FAST Act funding  authorizations.  Next, Congress will begin work on the FY 2018 budget.    Attachments: May 2017 Legislative Matrix    Local Streets and Roads and State Transit Assistance table    SB 1 Local Streets and Roads Spending Guidelines      RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ‐ POSITIONS ON STATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATION – May 2017  Legislation/ Author Description BillStatusPositionDate of Board Adoption AB 91 (Cervantes) Requires Caltrans to convert existing HOV lanes in Riverside County to operate only during hours of heavy commuter traffic; during all other times the lanes would be open to all vehicles, including those with a single occupant. Referred to Appropriations Committee; referred to suspense file.  (April 5, 2017) OPPOSE3/8/17 AB 351 (Melendez) Proposes to bring truck weight fees back to transportation accounts. Referred to Committee on Transportation. May be heard in committee after March 10.  (February 21, 2017) SUPPORT3/8/17 AB 179 (Cervantes) Changes the membership of the California Transportation Commission. Cleared Committee on Transportation 9 – 5. Referred to Appropriations.  (April 25, 2017) OPPOSE4/12/2017 AB 408 (Chen) Final offer of compensation in eminent domain cases. Died prior to going to committee pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).  (March 20, 2017) OPPOSE4/12/2017 AB 697 (Fong) Exempts private ambulances from paying tolls when responding to emergency and urgent calls. Cleared Appropriations Committee 16 – 0.  Ordered to Consent Calendar.  (April 27, 2017) OPPOSE4/12/2017 SB 132 (Budget and Fiscal Review Committee) Amendment to the Budget Act of 2016.  Creates the Riverside County Transportation Efficiency Corridor. Approved by the Governor.  Chaptered by Secretary of State.  (April 28, 2017) SUPPORT4/12/2017 SB 268 (Mendoza) Changes the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority board of directors governance structure. Cleared Transportation and Housing Committee 7 – 3.  Referred to Appropriations.  (May 10, 2017) 5/9/2017  Staff action based on platform  Legislation/ Author Description BillStatusPositionDate of Board Adoption AB 1523 (Obernolte) Authorizes the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) to use design‐build for local agencies to reconstruct the Mt. Vernon Avenue Viaduct project in San Bernardino. Cleared Local Government Committee 9 – 0.  Referred to Appropriations.  Amended.  (May 1, 2017) Support5/10/2017 SB 150 (Allen) Requires the state board to update and revise greenhouse gas emission reduction targets while considering vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reductions.  Requires the state board to assess current and historic VMT.  Requires the state to prepare a report every four years that assesses metropolitan planning organization progress toward meeting metrics. Cleared Transportation and Housing Committee 9 – 4. Referred to Appropriations.  Amended.  (April 27, 2017) Oppose5/10/2017 SB 264 (Nguyen) Requires net excess toll revenue from the Orange County Transportation Authority’s (OCTA) Interstate 405 Improvement Project to be allocated to OCTA and project corridor jurisdictions and requires the moneys to be spent on specified transportation improvement projects. Hearing in Transportation and Housing Committee scheduled for April 25; author cancelled hearing.  (April 25, 2017) Oppose5/10/2017 SB 477 (Cannella) Would allow for the extension of an existing rail corridor to provide intercity rail service beyond the defined boundaries of the corridor, subject to approval by the joint powers authority board and Secretary of Transportation. Hearing in Appropriations scheduled for May 8; on consent calendar.  (May 1, 2017) Support5/10/2017   SB 1 (10 year) SB 1 (annual)Banning 7,060,000$             706,000$      PUC 99313 PUC 99314 PUC 99313 PUC 99314Beaumont 10,320,000$           1,032,000$   Banning 1,450,524$      88,917$         145,052$       8,892$         Blythe 4,760,000$             476,000$      Beaumont 1,910,247$      116,216$       191,025$       11,622$       Calimesa 1,900,000$             190,000$      Corona 3,757,076$      257,915$       375,708$       25,792$       Canyon Lake 2,440,000$             244,000$      Riverside 3,741,232$      201,597$       374,123$       20,160$       Cathedral City 12,420,000$           1,242,000$   RTA 68,404,280$    9,372,332$   6,840,428$   937,233$     Coachella 10,390,000$           1,039,000$   RCTC Rail 22,356,331$    10,567,920$ 2,235,633$   1,056,792$ Corona 37,680,000$           3,768,000$   SunLine 24,698,960$    3,464,453$   2,469,896$   346,445$     Desert Hot Springs 6,650,000$             665,000$      Palo Verde 1,382,905$      54,858$         138,291$       5,486$         Eastvale 14,450,000$           1,445,000$   Hemet 18,320,000$           1,832,000$   TOTAL 127,701,555$  24,124,208$ 12,770,156$ 2,412,421$ Indian Wells 1,240,000$             124,000$      Indio 20,150,000$           2,015,000$   Jurupa Valley 22,470,000$           2,247,000$   La Quinta 9,150,000$             915,000$      Lake Elsinore 13,960,000$           1,396,000$   Menifee 20,370,000$           2,037,000$   Moreno Valley 47,000,000$           4,700,000$   Murrieta 26,040,000$           2,604,000$   Norco 6,190,000$             619,000$      Palm Desert 11,290,000$           1,129,000$   Palm Springs 10,680,000$           1,068,000$   Perris 16,870,000$           1,687,000$   Rancho Mirage 4,140,000$             414,000$      Riverside 74,300,000$           7,430,000$   San Jacinto 10,910,000$           1,091,000$   Temecula 24,960,000$           2,496,000$   Wildomar 8,050,000$             805,000$      TOTAL 454,160,000$        45,416,000$ County of Riverside 387,000,000$        38,700,000$ Local Streets and RoadsSB 1 (10 year) SB 1 (annual)State Transit Assistance SB 1 Local Streets and Roads Spending Guidelines  CHAPTER  2. Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program  2030.   (a) The Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program is hereby created to address deferred  maintenance on the state highway system and the local street and road system. Funds made available  by the program shall be prioritized for expenditure on basic road maintenance and road rehabilitation  projects, and on critical safety projects.  (b) (1) Funds made available by the program shall be used for projects that include, but are not limited  to, the following:  (A) Road maintenance and rehabilitation.  (B) Safety projects.  (C) Railroad grade separations.  (D) Complete street components, including active transportation purposes, pedestrian and bicycle safety  projects, transit facilities, and drainage and stormwater capture projects in conjunction with any other  allowable project.  (E) Traffic control devices.  (2) Funds made available by the program may also be used to satisfy a match requirement in order to  obtain state or federal funds for projects authorized by this subdivision.  (c) To the extent possible and cost effective, and where feasible, the department and cities and counties  receiving funds under the program shall use advanced technologies and material recycling techniques  that reduce the cost of maintaining and rehabilitating the streets and highways, and that exhibit  reduced levels of greenhouse gas emissions through material choice and construction method.  (d) To the extent possible and cost effective, and where feasible, the department and cities and counties  receiving funds under the program shall use advanced technologies and communications systems in  transportation infrastructure that recognize and accommodate advanced automotive technologies that  may include, but are not necessarily limited to, charging or fueling opportunities for zero‐emission  vehicles, and provision of infrastructure‐to‐vehicle communications for transitional or full autonomous  vehicle systems.  (e) To the extent deemed cost effective, and where feasible, in the context of both the project scope  and the risk level for the asset due to global climate change, the department and cities and counties  receiving funds under the program shall include features in the projects funded by the program to  better adapt the asset to withstand the negative effects of climate change and make the asset more  resilient to impacts such as fires, floods, and sea level rise.  (f) To the extent beneficial, cost effective, and practicable in the context of facility type, right‐of‐way,  project scope, and quality of nearby alternative facilities, and where feasible, the department and cities  and counties receiving funds under the program shall incorporate complete street elements into  projects funded by the program, including, but not limited to, elements that improve the quality of  bicycle and pedestrian facilities and that improve safety for all users of transportation facilities.  (g) For purposes of funds directed to the State Highway Operation and Protection Program, the  guidelines and reporting provisions shall be consistent with Section 14526.5 of the Government Code.  (h) Guidelines adopted by the commission to facilitate the allocation of funds in the account shall be  exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1  of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code).  2032.  (h) Notwithstanding Section 13340 of the Government Code, the balance of the revenues deposited in  the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account are hereby continuously appropriated as follows:  (1) Fifty percent for allocation to the department for maintenance of the state highway system or for  purposes of the state highway operation and protection program.  (2) Fifty percent for apportionment to cities and counties by the Controller pursuant to the formula in  clauses (i) and (ii) of subparagraph (C) of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 2103 for the  purposes authorized by this chapter.  2034.   (a) (1) Prior to receiving an apportionment of funds under the program pursuant to paragraph (2) of  subdivision (h) of Section 2032 from the Controller in a fiscal year, an eligible city or county shall submit  to the commission a list of projects proposed to be funded with these funds pursuant to an adopted city  or county budget. All projects proposed to receive funding shall be included in a city or county budget  that is adopted by the applicable city council or county board of supervisors at a regular public meeting.  The list of projects proposed to be funded with these funds shall include a description and the location  of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful  life of the improvement. The project list shall not limit the flexibility of an eligible city or county to fund  projects in accordance with local needs and priorities so long as the projects are consistent with  subdivision (b) of Section 2030.  (2) The commission shall report to the Controller the cities and counties that have submitted a list of  projects as described in this subdivision and that are therefore eligible to receive an apportionment of  funds under the program for the applicable fiscal year. The Controller, upon receipt of the report, shall  apportion funds to eligible cities and counties.  (b) For each fiscal year, each city or county receiving an apportionment of funds shall, upon expending  program funds, submit documentation to the commission that includes a description and location of  each completed project, the amount of funds expended on the project, the completion date, and the  estimated useful life of the improvement.  2036.   (a) Cities and counties shall maintain their existing commitment of local funds for street, road, and  highway purposes in order to remain eligible for an allocation or apportionment of funds pursuant to  Section 2032.  (b) In order to receive an allocation or apportionment pursuant to Section 2032, the city or county shall  annually expend from its general fund for street, road, and highway purposes an amount not less than  the annual average of its expenditures from its general fund during the 2009–10, 2010–11, and 2011–12  fiscal years, as reported to the Controller pursuant to Section 2151. For purposes of this subdivision, in  calculating a city’s or county’s annual general fund expenditures and its average general fund  expenditures for the 2009–10, 2010–11, and 2011–12 fiscal years, any unrestricted funds that the city or  county may expend at its discretion, including vehicle in‐lieu tax revenues and revenues from fines and  forfeitures, expended for street, road, and highway purposes shall be considered expenditures from the  general fund. One‐time allocations that have been expended for street and highway purposes, but  which may not be available on an ongoing basis, including revenue provided under the Teeter Plan Bond  Law of 1994 (Chapter 6.6 (commencing with Section 54773) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the  Government Code), may not be considered when calculating a city’s or county’s annual general fund  expenditures.  (c) For any city incorporated after July 1, 2009, the Controller shall calculate an annual average  expenditure for the period between July 1, 2009, and December 31, 2015, inclusive, that the city was  incorporated.  (d) For purposes of subdivision (b), the Controller may request fiscal data from cities and counties in  addition to data provided pursuant to Section 2151, for the 2009–10, 2010–11, and 2011–12 fiscal years.  Each city and county shall furnish the data to the Controller not later than 120 days after receiving the  request. The Controller may withhold payment to cities and counties that do not comply with the  request for information or that provide incomplete data.  (e) The Controller may perform audits to ensure compliance with subdivision (b) when deemed  necessary. Any city or county that has not complied with subdivision (b) shall reimburse the state for the  funds it received during that fiscal year. Any funds withheld or returned as a result of a failure to comply  with subdivision (b) shall be reapportioned to the other counties and cities whose expenditures are in  compliance.  (f) If a city or county fails to comply with the requirements of subdivision (b) in a particular fiscal year,  the city or county may expend during that fiscal year and the following fiscal year a total amount that is  not less than the total amount required to be expended for those fiscal years for purposes of complying  with subdivision (b).  2037.   A city or county may spend its apportionment of funds under the program on transportation priorities  other than those allowable pursuant to this chapter if the city’s or county’s average Pavement Condition  Index meets or exceeds 80.  2038.   The California Workforce Development Board shall develop guidelines for public agencies receiving  Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account funds to participate in, invest in, or partner with, new or  existing preapprenticeship training programs established pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 14230 of  the Unemployment Insurance Code. The department and local agencies that receive Road Maintenance  and Rehabilitation Account funds pursuant to this chapter shall, not later than July 1, 2023, follow the  guidelines set forth by the board. The board shall also establish a preapprenticeship development and  training grant program, beginning January 1, 2019, pursuant to subdivision (e) of Section 14230 of the  Unemployment Insurance Code. Local public agencies that receive Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation  Account funds pursuant to this chapter are eligible to compete for such grants and may apply in  partnership with other agencies and entities, including those with existing preapprenticeship programs.  Successful grant applicants shall, to the extent feasible:  (a) Follow the multicraft core curriculum implemented by the State Department of Education for its pilot  project with the California Partnership Academies and by the California Workforce Development Board  and local boards.   (b) Include a plan for outreach to and retention of women participants in the preapprenticeship  program to help increase the representation of women in the building and construction trades.  (c) Include a plan for outreach to and retention of minority participants and underrepresented  subgroups in the preapprenticeship program to help increase their representation in the building and  construction trades.  (d) Include a plan for outreach to and retention of disadvantaged youth participants in the  preapprenticeship program to help increase their employment opportunities in the building and  construction trades.  (e) Include a plan for outreach to individuals in the local labor market area and to formerly incarcerated  individuals to provide pathways to employment and training.   (f) Coordinate with local state‐approved apprenticeship programs, local building trade councils, and to  the extent possible the California Conservation Corps and certified community conservation corps, so  individuals who have completed these programs have a pathway to continued employment.    AGENDA ITEM 7 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 7. AGENDA ITEM 8 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 8. AGENDA ITEM 9   Agenda Item 11  RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION  DATE: May 15, 2017  TO: Technical Advisory Committee  FROM:  Martha Masters, Management Analyst  Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager  Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director  SUBJECT: Obligation Delivery Plan Update – FFY 2016/17    STAFF RECOMMENDATION:    Receive and file.    BACKGROUND INFORMATION:    As the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA), RCTC is responsible for ensuring that federal  Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) and Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) funds  apportioned to Riverside County are allocated and obligated in a timely manner to prevent funds from  lapsing.  Federal Obligation Authority (OA) for the region is provided on an annual basis and has to be  used in the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) it is provided.  The Commission’s goal is to ensure that 100 percent  of its OA is obligated.    RCTC has been working closely with local agencies and Caltrans to ensure projects on the Obligation  Delivery Plan are obligated and delivered.  Many of these projects are from the 2013 Multi‐Funding  Call for Projects, 2013 RSTP Call for Projects, CVAG’s 2014 CMAQ Call for Projects, and various other  projects that had been awarded RSTP or CMAQ funds by the Commission. The attached obligation plan  is an outline of the projects that have RSTP or CMAQ programmed in FFY 2016/17.  The information  provided in the attached obligation plan comes from milestone updates received from your agencies,  discussions with project sponsors, and our monthly meetings with local assistance.     As we near the end of the FFY 2016/17, we have assessed the probability of 16 projects currently in the  pipeline for federal‐aid approval (E‐76), totaling $141,607,153, and believe 69 percent of the planned  obligations have a good chance of securing E‐76 approvals, totaling $129 million.  The main contributor  to perhaps one of our highest obligation year is the I‐15 ELP that has a combined programming amount  of approximately $109 million.  The highest obligation previously achieved by Riverside County was  $88,975,678 in FFY 2010/11.  We will be working closely with Caltrans and other County Commissions  to determine if RCTC will need an apportionment and/or OA loan from another County to ensure our  projects are obligated, as needed.        Attachment: FFY 2016/17 Obligation Plan  Z 10I abed Aew 101 pa3edpnue13a1M/y uo 93.11103. 'Palaldwoa 3Sd 5606- T/£ •AePr ul pawdpnue s! NOD V. - 5/4 'alaidwoa %08 sI 395d'LI02 uef u! !eulwgns uo7 yjy 8uusadx3 'In uo spiels {3d 3o941D 41Im u1 P.3.134inS - 9/0 e:ou ds Sea- LI/9I Ai 039Vd LI02/E/L � LI02/0E/9 LT02/0E/S 9T02/L/4 pauap uo7 000'0913 SIPAel3e A31a s1013. uo.0.1.414 II swID 01W 213 lle1sul (0T0)4625 lWD e11a43e0J wi0 ap 1a83aA 1+a91y slim.. 33d 3no11011ou PooP 'IE 413e01 II9PN4 uo a9 IIIM '3J a43 a3edald ue3 Ali -salpnis ;o saldoa pm,..) 811gleM -peg uoge8a{ap yd. pion As 1,uea lnq aialdu3oa sl nu3 - I/£ 'APea+ NOD V. Pue,o3 MOE 8u13edald'au.P 33- Si. LI/4/9Pan03dde 33-4/13 '9IO2 +agwa.0 pue lagol>O uaamlaq ui pa88o1 s!eu u3gns-a3 snoueA 'lenoldde !ewawuo+uua paAe!ap aney quota.. bat salpnls leluawuw!nua an!suale3 a3a{dwo3 03 3ue,nsuo> ysnd of +e250 'so,. le.,3 8,31e8a3 pews pue auo4d Aq A, y31m do pvsoll0i - 6/T 9/I u0 udew 3dy w8ls nna - I/Z 6/2 Pt, 8SdH - 4/4 ezoulds3 lease LI/9IM 039Vd LIOZ/E/L LI02/0£/9 c.d./5 LTOZ/9/4 Paea10 uoJ 000'9L2'2 8uluaplM-uamgu, s>fa 01 uoef w3;ogq any (9T0)462S ld1S ella4>e'07 solo ap la 1aA l+a9M I., is £SIbZBbL 000'000'S5 s ionebil9O pa_lo,d •spumy am3n111e W d5d3 uo uo!ssmgp !ewe, ue aney 03717d 'yid a4310 sleq!wgns ay; ;o 1.W. ya 1ye3p Papuo3d - 4/p •>ut yN odsuell 31303 ay1e314..8 011524'0194S 5) .41.d .131A.ld sa>In+as 1101 a43;0ill ST-110 NO7 pue Asap (fesodold pue plq) did a43 dot p3eme o3...I uoa 30;yMHi Palsan6. slaafold IeP.'S 10 a1810OH-1D :LI02/8I/TO '3>ell110D p1In8 -u81sa0 3apuold saasala5 I101- oafold sauel ssa+dx3 5T-110 p.my a43 w pa11nw0a yMHi :LTOZ/SZ/TO a8e>faed N.,. of ell^3 'd13 S11 a41.9 suoll...1 Pue 101,1310 paaue4u3 s0e331.3 V.I. 1.111.3431.3 P.P... 717d :LIOZ/LZ/FO 'dsd3 81,3!II1n LI/9IOZ Ai u! spun; p0 uoge89gp ,3 pa3e8a18as of pa3elwsse A!ulew) swawwo, 8ulssalppe uo 8uppom Apo.. Dip,''9I/82/iT uo V'I n uwly pnal quaww07 - a3 Awsm310; paulwgns yid- 9I/9F/T I .quawwON 3,e11n3 lad V. pa1111319nsa3 DIA - 92/T 'qNd 31321P,13 ...as 83d No, yjy of queue., - 4/4 za3enry a3e30 papaau lunoweol anp smaA lel., w 11,11.3V did LIOZ/OE/L LTOZ/OE/9 uo7 T0Y9L4'0T Pd 0>IeleJ Pue 09 1,15 313o115T-1 (520)8029-Nldls s uelye7 sepwa3d etfn3 •spunl a+nyn; Ile iO dsd3 uo uulssn3s. leu3awl ue aney of D1Dd •laual aaeeuy pa.A1,5. ma!na1 of eyln3 'ueol a .1.111... sly] 3ayw 01 mal 03 Aap145-I/E Yid a4310 s1e131w431s a41 403.ppay3 ge1p pap,. - q/9 11310313 ayl y0 pue ay1 Aq 2 puawy dill LIOZ a141 .18u11!em a1141n D1J11a3ePdn P. slelUwgns a need yid ay3 ma,. of an3!1303 01 e31313 •slallal awee, 31Vdyd3s ON. +a11a1 aweu1103N19 W OD ilwgns 01 DIA uonsanb w a1ewl1x3 3.3 a41 asua3 01 317d tLTOZ/90/I0 'w{ yN odwely u03 393e3110.3 of (SZ Votp'85$) u0I1+0d 3apw03d >In1aS i101 a.10131 ST-1 l0 NOD PueuBisaP 11es1do3tl W e P!91 did a ft; 3of P3eme 01 aaua31n0uoa +o}yMHi Par..., gaafo3d lel>ads yo aa910 OH-17, IOZ/8I/FO .a8eslzed ntaua3. e11n3'g1e31uoD 90 SI 1 a41 ./ V.101e111.4ns. Pallewa 313d tLI02/L2/TO "dsd3 93431113n LI/9IOZ AI ul spun; 0 L1011.1140 13503 pa1e8a38as o3 pa3elwsse Alulew) sivawwoa eu!ssalppe uo Sup,. Aiwa3.3 Dip,' t9I/82/II uo yl 1, w631; pna3 51u8w110, .maua+ Ams3n3 toy pau!wgns yid - 9I/9I/IT •quaw11103 s,eiu3lad Vid paulwgnsal D1Dd -92/I ',Aid D1Dd Pue 1D of luas 834 NOJ yid 03 sluawuo, - gift lel., an, papaau .nude of anp sdeaA!e3ana5 luawpuaury d18 LIOZ/O£/L LI02/OE/9 ',OD Z56'8I4'£4 000'O00'SS Pd oalefeD Poe 09 y5 u+OH SI-I (I80) 9S09-N1d15 D1Dd sepwa3d e11,13 uoneponay leluawuop, pue E .61 ivawpuau+y A1ua1sl113o3 dlli LIN Pue I-V SDS/dld 9T02 W 1e3101dde 9ulpuad-LS/6/S 8T/LT M 39Sd LTOZ/E/L pa3ea{7 uoD 000130613 DI Pd uo>5/5I Z-I aayluapry 3o3ap!313n1y 0 Aluno3 sepwa3d elu3 'dsd3 ag uea 1nq'02/6I of 8ulpun; panow - du, w s! 3>afo3d 3,3e. uo a3e Aay3 a3u y saas :l3agry palepyena3 nua pa 1s 1ew+ea asn o1 quem 'ApuaM 03 PaMle; :a3e3- TA LIOZ'0£ aunf:yjy '39Sd %S611a13111a4x 10d - 5/4 aq Aeel...pd., ue 10 dlli a43 ul 3ou nlaaPad swaas, pue uemy u1o1y a8essaw auo4d pan., Jay., 3au+y 02/61 A3 39Sd LTOZ/E/L LIU/OEM LTOZ/SI/S Pa3ea10 u07 000'626'8 I'4d a8ueya1a1u1 -pnlg o3a33od/091,5 (800)60Z5 OFW30 luownea9 WA./ u ap Ia8.A Uagry 8uu way saloN q..t110 'w3 ww quao, af,isuexpe7 Waal Olinpy xua11 u01 3eaA 8ulPun; di, sn1e351>afwd P...)7ulpuni .01,M V. aye0 auo;sapyl 24e0 NOMid ilea awns,. Kea 0338'a'd 039Vd 011. bW V, 31o9e3e133ajoad N. Mue8y Wd WI., /11e15 sue131eD slemoddy pafold Ea:VaI/510 sd SNOIIt/9119O LTOZ/9TOZ A33 9NIGN3d Z bo Z bled 000'99E135 suoneH11g0 Pa1>a(o1d AmH le>oy pue a;eys Paulgwo) 000'545'0I 000'98E'E 0,13e.1190 Pay>ai01d .salpnls 1e10403 p,,, Vam qt., 37 laid Huna!dUA00-T/E LT/6I/E P.A0,.e 33 '19MJ1) 8ua4sluol! u10.4 lelwlddeam>as am »uo CT/9T Ad °1 pawwetioldai aq of Hulpun, panwdde 41.H Pue'o!g'VSI'0V'S3d-ll uo!sualxa yyJl l°; 9tl751>eiu°>II!M-0£/Ti ,00,lnsuo> alels -0l-aye;5lsanb. saqul PIP - W., /zK 1450I paaN - b/T ailed lano> 3dV su8!s 3V1O - T/2 OE/£ u0 AL7 of lugs ua3 MOP - b/b 93P PaunugnS-LT/EI/b (yueylnsuoJ) lawaH uuV /11mA ueO 9I/SI Ai ❑Mid 9T02/0£/ZT LI02/0E/9 9IO2/0E/S LIOUPI/E Payeap 007 000'LOL sau�gMre aAp•PUeJO ISOoi48bs lino iew0P1!M .19009,D .sa!pnls 1em3N> P.>aa vaam s!y13,'Pox! euna!du1o)-T/E LI/4T/E P.A.,.e 37 d.3 au!zllnn LI/9I Ai u! PaleBggo aq ue> lnq 8T/LI Ai u! PawwelHoid spun, •A,Aal lapun uonellnsuo> !elnyloJ 'TE/ZI 5!len0101de w;leo8 :UOJOV 7/3L 'W31 w;au, puo!sualxa 3eaA-Z panoldde 9VJ5- OI/IS LlloneW1.0> a1e15 -oialels Isanbai saq!il 0!0 - uweV /m 94> of PaaN - b/T glad lano> 3dV suR0 3tl1O - T/Z 0£/E uo AID 01 was 11a7 MOP - 4/4 Via Pa11144,405-LT/£T/b puellos 3) Jaw,. w,.!I, /g10A 0, 8T/LI Ai 0318Vd 9IO2/0E/ZI LT0U0E/9 9102/0E/5 LT02/0I/E P.eaI7 u00 000'6T9 iW01J sauel ageg aA V pile, (LOO)MSll.7 ieu0PIIM ellO oH!4J .zna!nal lapun Apnys >RI,'g3OVN'PTV '3dV'PsdH .°3u!Ieuo11lPPe 1!wgns of spaau Au,'ssa!Rold u! nu3 - I/F 'LT/8/E yo se maual u! 0PH'Ps'V',sdH 'Pan0ldde g115N a>uo ANN Paau IIIM 'LI/42/E was PSN uo sp,aww°) 'payuulgns yaA you ApuS>%e11 9TOZ >a9wan0N pm-A!lea ul pau!wgns POV 9. •gsv 9,, H'PSda MD 1uaw0w a413e Hu!PuelsM..11oda3 APnls aswN Pue VIJ'VSI.41'Papaauaiele4; syuawnwPleluawua!nua a43Hu!P.I.I.. 1e1 P3 o1a10dS-9T32/22/ZI 'LI/9T .4 A1.3410.'Au. u! 11!15 - 4/I L/£P,>a1 P3PN'IOW 'PSdH- P/4 e1¢1 1..emp3 30 Pue S3d 1.10 appay>s apinold of uweV-Sip LT/9T Ai 03'8Vd LTOZ/E/L LLA4,0£/9 9IOZOE/ZI 9IO2/9T/9 uoJ 000'029'2 (sul 9- b Hwuap!M) Alnqueg 01ueue4>09 wop anV Bum.. (201185051d1S ap!ssngi a3!009,4D keys w0 he of P bolo syuaww°> woo;S3d - T/f An ',now, o; HumunuoJ .snlels my LT/Slb Pue LI/TZ/E uo zeH pue pig pa;>eiuoJ .Alloy Oy zeN Pue o1g paaN 'Li/OT/Z 53d P�>aP -9T02/0T/OT u0 00 suag yaf 01 lugs s;uawwo> S3d Ayl>ol was syuawun> u! you a Aew'u¢ 1a S3d 4,9'LT/9T q a5 d-b/I EZ/T 00 VSI!IP. S3d PaA!a>aP - I/Z alepdn ou -p/p uosuag Oaf 30 Pue S3d uoalnpa4>s ap!nold 04 uoleV -S/b LI/9I Ai 03Ved LTOZ/£/1 LI02/OE/9 LTOZ/OFjS M/P ODD'TE Huuua, pues.e due m01, >y}ei1 18l a>oyS eu, ue uoweP 4 43 P PP (9TOIZI65lW7 aRem a8ei!yN so!0 ap Iaesol 11ag1V NO0'dil lob 2,11..1105 galep4eA. A uaaq se4 Vd3N'aun!/ eyy u! Vill '35d ul I IHS - i/E '9IO2/Z/ZI uo pasuag luawssassVA1Pero 1M:Palaldwo> 1.100epgenag.Au3 .w10-3 uonep!lenaPV03)/Vd3N.3P 3,0- 9TOZ/L/TT >1e A anadde ua 4 W 9 p Sit P °N LIOZ uI - 4/T snyeys bold 10; A1n paese ye15 - ph raydweyp leAes LI/9I Ai 3NSd 9T02/E/L LIO2/OE/9 9I0Z/DE/S 9T02/UTT A0.3 Panay' uoJ 000'Z04 (sauei a!pg) soon., snopeA (440)Z8251WJ s8w1d5 wled so!O op ia8iaq liagiV 9I/6Z/ZI P...I.Vd3N •sgaam Z-I u! snye3s uo do .01.II!As'3. uo 9u11,M - T/E 1dV 30 Pua NO) v,,, "Ram you pau!wgns aq g!m V.7 MOP Pue a>!;ou A311!ln • s/b 9I/6Z/ZI Panoldde 3J '9I32/22/IT uo 1J 03,,,,11 ns PSN ysalei :panoldde aq 0, 2u!u!ew01 umuodwo> I¢yuawHw uopAua pueys9n0 A, a4; s! vs.!,4sof 'IeAOidde Vd3N AU Pal>ayV - 4/I 'alepdn ou - Or uos aq> N50,1 LI/9T Ai 03'8Vd LIOZ/E/L LI02/0£/9 LT02/005 9102/62/2I P...1) u00 000'089'1F eu!uaPIM TIT AMH (LZOISLZS N1d15 o!Pul .A ap !a&aq lraglV 1,01, A1lea/lepi a3el u8!sap mug- pa...31a.- I/E Aey4 h!1ea NpJ V. ',dV F. P...1. 31a3 MOP - Sib 'alaldusw u8lsap %06'alepdn au -p/q uosyaq>II4 us,LI/91 Ai u8!sa O LIOZ/E/L LTOZ/0E/9 LI02/0£/5 9I0Z/2I/L pweal0 uoJ 000'ZEI'T °!pu1 u! spew',wo ',wows. (b);no,;o Ruined (0£0)5LZ5-lWJ 0!Pul solo ap la,..A ua91V '9I/F 41a> M/II>u000 /np :lady p!w pau!wgns aq oy V3P :a;aldwo> 35d %56- L/E lea!wgns ludV pen V'iP -5/4 •SI/LO/ZI ;o e po>a1ayl 10; AJ a43 07ugs pue u0yng u01eV Aq pauHs uaaq sag uolepgeA-a,. Vd3N Palsanbal a41 'alaldw0> %06 s! 395d !LIOZ'uei u! leu!wgns uoJ 21,padx d Hu!lleme lips •sa,e do ou - tliP 3 �I Vd11 II. P b/4 is a a! uOP dV 1. p w do-m0 0 1 u l II ioua 91V-5/b LI/9i Ai °7 LTO£L 9TOZ/Of/9 Palea7 9LOZDE/S SIODU2 Panal u°J OODSET geyag wawaned Aeyan0 Paz!1a9Q0P 3aai;S M°OJ (EOOII0451d15 sllaM ue!pu1 soO aP IaH1an;lagiV pau!wgns aq °y9L-3 - I/F '9T/9/2I u0'OH 03 Palllwgnsal 9,-, igugns-a1 pue suo!z!Aa1 alew of ploy pue Awale 01 Peumlal alam 0.£ Pue V-ZT sy!g14x3 a419I/SI/ZT u0 '211Pua'uV LIO2 u1 . P/T •pau!wsue13 uaaq you se4 gL-3 'L[OZ uel a s u°!s!naI alewnsa pue 3auai a>ueuy HunlemV - pip Aaweg Ala,•panoldde s! Zq puau, dad ua4m gl -3 3!wgns °y oH14J A3nou II!m 8.0P - T/Z lauen aweuy pas.AaJ uo AID 41!m u! re43 01 DIM - VP LI/9I M uo) 1.01.000s 91/61/8 9IOZ/OE/9 9IOZ/0£/5 9i0Z/i£/S P°JPiI] °°J 000'2f8 9¢4.P luawaned anV 0!/ew0 (SbD) POTS 1d15 euolo7 aH!O o8!y7 Hpsu u+w{satOk sluaww0,,413 SW....., J3?P/sueuyieJ w0ya4u1 swa;Iu011>tl Hu » A IW idLld sn�y5 y>a(oyd Wa.un•J auoysal!VY VdP auolsoliW MA1VIA1 a4e0 eu.e.LI 4 038Vd CITSVd Hu un !P i 9 u°!1e>o11>a[a1d N. A>uaBV /y/eis sueaPeODELLSbVW7 sic/muddy lae(old LTOZ/OI/S 1° sV SN011VD1180 LIR/910Z Aj3 9NICIN3d AGENDA ITEM 10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION  DATE: May 15, 2017  TO: Technical Advisory Committee  FROM: Martha Masters, Management Analyst  Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager   SUBJECT: 2017 Federal Transportation Improvement Program    STAFF RECOMMENDATION:    Receive and file.    BACKGROUND INFORMATION:    The 2017 FTIP officially replaced the 2015 FTIP on the date of adoption,   December 16, 2016.  As of today, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has  processed four formal amendments; two consistency amendments associated to the 2016 Regional  Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy amendments; and three administrative  modifications.  All formal amendments with the exception of the Amendment No. 8 have received the  reviewing agencies conformity approvals; consistency amendment No. 3 is expected to be approved in  June/July 2017 and consistency amendment No. 7 in August/September 2017.  Administrative  modification approvals are delegated to SCAG and two of the three administrative modifications have  been approved.  The next amendment is an administrative modification (17‐10) and is due to SCAG on  May 23.      Planning and Programming staff keeps track of the needed changes for our member agencies projects  to ensure obligation of funds without any delays but we also urge you to be familiar with the  information currently programmed for your projects in the FTIP and to notify us of any changes so they  can properly be incorporated into the FTIP to avoid obligation delays.  The latest 2017 FTIP Amendment  schedule is being provided for your convenience.      The new 2017 FTIP Approved Listing including Amendment No. 1‐2 and 4‐6 is available at SCAG’s  website http://ftip.scag.ca.gov/Pages/2017/approved.aspx.      Please feel free to contact RCTC Programming staff with any questions you may have about on‐going  projects that may require updates in the 2017 FTIP for federal approvals and/or federal obligations.             Due Date (by Noon)Amendments Administrative Modifications Tuesday, July 19, 2016 Amendment #17-01 2016 STIP, 2016 SHOPP, HBP and emergency type changes to address comments received on Draft 2017 FTIP only. Concurrent with 2017 FTIP base Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2016 RTP/SCS Amendment #1 FTIP Amendment #17-97 (will become #17-03) CONSISTENCY AMENDMENT FOR MODELING ONLY (New and updates to existing modeled projects -- only scope or completion date) Tuesday, October 25, 2016 Amendment #17-02 Tuesday, November 1, 2016 *Consistency Amendment #17-03 (Programming for #17-97) Tuesday, November 29, 2016 Administrative Modification #17-04 Tuesday, January 17, 2017 Amendment #17-05 Friday, January 27, 2017 2016 RTP/SCS Amendment #2 ** Consistency Amendment #17-07 CONSISTENCY AMENDMENT -- New non-exempt projects and updates to existing modeled projects. NOTE: Projects in Consistency Amendment #17-07 cannot be updated until Amendment is Federally Approved Tuesday, February 28, 2017 Administrative Modification #17-06 Tuesday, April 4, 2017 Amendment #17-08 Tuesday, May 2, 2017 EMERGENCY ADM MOD Administrative Modification #17-09 Tuesday, May 23, 2017 Administrative Modification #17-10 Tuesday, July 11, 2017 Amendment #17-11 Tuesday, August 29, 2017 Administrative Modification #17-12 Tuesday, October 3, 2017 Amendment #17-13 Tuesday, November 21, 2017 Administrative Modification #17-14 Tuesday, December 26, 2017 Amendment #17-15 Tuesday, January 9, 2018 Updated 05/02/2017 2017 FTIP AMENDMENT/ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION SCHEDULE Note: Amendment # may change depending on emergency requests between December and August. *Consistency Amendment will be presented to TC January 2017, RC Adoption April 2017 **Consistency Amendment #17-07 will be presented to TC April 2017, RC Adoption July 2017 2019 COUNTY TIP SUBMITTALS DUE TO SCAG AGENDA ITEM 11 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 11. AGENDA ITEM 12 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 12.