The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About09 September 18, 2017 Technical Advisory CommitteeTECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Commission Staff Anne Mayer, Executive Director Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director TIME: 10:00 A.M. DATE: September 18, 2017 LOCATION: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor Conference Room A Riverside, CA 92501 COMMITTEE MEMBERS Nino Abad, City of Hemet Martin Magana, CVAG Lori Askew, City of Calimesa Bob Moehling, City of Murrieta Armando Baldizzone, City of Blythe Farshid Mohammadi, City of Riverside – VICE CHAIR Chad Blais, City of Norco Habib Motlagh, Cities of Perris and San Jacinto Bo Chen, City of Palm Desert Nelson Nelson, City of Corona K. George Colangeli, PVVTA Aaron Palmer, City of Canyon Lake John Corella, City of Cathedral City Daniel Porras, City of Desert Hot Springs Brad Fagrell, City of Lake Elsinore Patricia Romo, County of Riverside Tom Garcia, City of Palm Springs Mark Sambito, City of Rancho Mirage Christopher Gray, WRCOG Ken Seumalo, City of Indian Wells – CHAIR Jonathan Hoy, City of Coachella Jonathan Smith, City of Menifee Joe Indrawan, City of Eastvale Patrick Thomas, City of Temecula Amer Jakher, City of Beaumont Art Vela, City of Banning Rohan Kuruppu, Riverside Transit Agency Timothy T. Wassil, City of Indio David Lee, Caltrans District 8 Ed Wimmer, City of La Quinta Eric Lewis, City of Moreno Valley Dan York, City of Wildomar Steve Loriso, City of Jurupa Valley COMM-TAC-00058 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA* *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda. TIME: 10:00 A.M. (PLEASE NOTE TIME CHANGE) DATE: September 18, 2017 LOCATION: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, Third Floor Conference Room A Riverside, CA 92501 In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Government Code Section 54954.2, and the Federal Transit Administration Title VI, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787‐7141 if special assistance is needed to participate in a Commission meeting, including accessibility and translation services. Assistance is provided free of charge. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting time will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide assistance at the meeting. 1. Call to Order 2. Self-Introductions 3. Approval of May 15, 2017 and July 17, 2017 Minutes 4. Public Comments (This is for comments on items not listed on agenda. Comments relating to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is before the Committee.) 5. 2019 FTIP Update Process (Attachment) 6. Long Range Transportation Plan Advisory Committee (Verbal Presentation) 7. SB 1 Funding Programs Update (Attachment) 8. ATP Augmentation Funds Update (Handout) 9. SB 821 Project Recommendations Update (Attachment) 10. 2018 STIP Development/Update (Attachment) 11. Caltrans Local Assistance Update (Verbal Presentation) 12. FFY 16/17 Obligation Authority Report (Attachment) 13. FFY 17/18 Obligation Authority Plan (Attachment) Technical Advisory Committee Meeting September 18, 2017 Page 2 14. September Commission Meeting Highlights (Verbal Presentation) 15. Other Announcements 16. Other Business 17. Adjournment (The next meeting will be November 20, 2017 at CVAG, Board Room, Palm Desert at 10:30 a.m. ~ AGENCY TAC MEMBER TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 18, 2017 PLEASE SIGN IN ALTERNATE PRINT NAME SIGNATURE and EMAIL BANNING iART VELA I Holly Stuart J:g Director of Pu~~ Works _ --!ubl~ Works Analyst _ _______ _ _ ______ _ IAMER JAKHER I Todd Parton Public Works Director/City Engineer City Manager I I emtiE ---i~~:~~P::;i:~NE -1 -----------------·-·-·----·----------··-----CVAG CALIMESA CAL TRANS --· I MARTIN MAGANA 7 I . tirector of Transportation ! LORI ASKEW ___ -------/ ! Michael Thornton •Public Works Director I City Engineer 1DAVID LEE -----·-------.. __ I --1 District Local Assistance Planner / ; CANYON LAKE f ·---. ··----· ----·-· ----1---jAARON PALMER ' ---! ! _____ l_ __ _ I City Manager CATHEDRAL CITY 11JOHN COREL~-/ --lem $imon_s __ _ . City Engineer [Senior Engineer I COACHELLA CORONA DESERT HOT SPRINGS jJoN-AT-HAN HOY ___ -/ -[-Ma-ritza Ma-rti-nez----:City Engineer , Interim Public Works Director ---I ---------l: --------------lNELsoN NELSON i Linda Bazmi / tblic Woms~rector/Clty En~n= _ ! s.:iorE~neev' 'DANIEL PORRAS I Richard Kopecky Public Works Manager , Contract City Engineer ____ _l_ I I I ·--- TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 18, 2017 PLEASE SIGN IN AGENCY TAC MEMBER I ALTERNATE PRINT NAME SIGNATURE EASTVALE JOE INDRAWAN Craig Bradshaw ~~~ I I I I 1------------"-I -----------------------------------------------··---------------------------HEMET i NINO ABAD Alexander Meyerhoff !Acting Director of Engineering City Manager ! ! I INDIAN WELLS !KEN SEUMALO-CHAIR iBondie Baker . ---1 ---!Public Works Director / :Assistant Engineer II [ ' I -----·--~-------------------------f ----------------------------------INDIO iTIMOTHY T. WASSIL iEric Weck ! j Public Works Director / ! Principal Civil Engineer JURUPA VALLEY -~STEVE LORlso -:Gary Thompson --. ------. ------···· ·--!Director of Public Works/City Engineer i City Manager I I I ' ' ----t---------------~---------------·-. ------LA QUINTA ,ED WIMMER ~ ' 1 , Principal Engineer ! I i LAKE ELSINORE -BRAD FAGRELL -----------Jason Simpson 1-----t-----·------·---··· -------·--··--City Engineer !Assistant City Manager . · ! I I MENIFEE i:~~~::i.:'. ~~,:ortCity Engineer St€_v_e_G-1y._nn-------~: 1--·----··----r---·---· ---··--------·· ----MORENo v.6.L:L.ev -lER1c LEWIS !Michael Lloyd . ------··-----·-------·-···---Transportation Division Manager/City / 'Engineering Division +: Traffic Engineer ,../ Manager/Assistant City 1----------···-_ __ Engineer -----------··--· _ -·-··------·-... __ _ MURRI ET A BOB MOEHLING Jeff Hitch City Engineer / Public Works Construction , . 1Manager I i -·------------------------------------------ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------NORCO CHAD BLAIS Bill Thompson Public Works Director Water and Sewer Utilities TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 18, 2017 PLEASE SIGN IN AGENCY TAC MEMBER 1 ALTERNATE i PRINT NAME SIGNATURE and EMAIL ,PALM :ESERT ~~ ~~i~eer ~~i~:~eer . --I -I -------------PALM SPRINGS TOM GARCIA Savat Khamphou + i Director of Engineering/City Engineer 1 Senior Civil Engineer I ,,......... I i j PVvrA ----K. GEORGE COLANGELI -----1Dale Reynolds -J -1----Transit General Manager ! ! I I I I i < I I I ~----------·· ---· .. --------------+-----------·--·-·-·--·------PERRIS i HABIB MOTLAGH 'I : i City Engineer v" 1 I 'iID: tROHAN KURUPPU . -----~~~s~~n~:~~n~~~gramm' -------------------------! I Specialist i j ·-·-----·-. ---------------RANCHO MIRAGE 'MARK SAMBITO :William Enos Director of Public Works / 'City Engineer I RIVERSIDE--ii=ARSHID MOHAMMAD!~ VICE CHAIR 'I' Kris Martinez ------------------------! Engineering Manager Public Works Director I ..__________ --------------------------------------------RIVERSIDE COUNTY PATRICIA ROMO Mojahed Salama /J,41 / : Director of Transportation Deputy Director of • p c1I { : Transportation , SAN JACiNTO -:HABiB MOTLAGH ·--·--------~-----------------·--···---·· ---·-· .. SUNilNE --fv;:~neer ----1~~~~s~P:~~g Mana:-------TEMECULA ---l~=;~~~~~~orks . 7 IAffierAttar -/-----------·--·· ··-·----· ---···-·-·· ·-···--·-------1 ---------1------ -I AGENCY ! TAC MEMBER WILDOMAR DAN YORK ~ Assistant City Manager/Director of ublic , Works/City Engineer --------WRCOG CHRISTOPHER GRAY TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 18, 2017 PLEASE SIGN IN ALTERNATE PRINT NAME Matt Bennett ' SIGNATURE and EMAIL --------------------Chns Tzeng r . Director of Transportation ,/ !Program M=-- -. ---------------------------I I I I I ------------+-----------1------T ----------------------------------------I ------------1--------------------------------i I ___ j_ ___ +------------_ _______ l -------------I I I ' I ----------------------------------------------i--------------------------------___ l -------------_ _J ___ ------------------------~ ------------------1----------------------------------------------------------------I I I i I ~, CITY TAC MEMBER ALTERNATE TAC SEPTEMBER 18, 2017 PRINT NAME BANNING 99 E. Ramsey Street Banning 92220 jART VELA 'I Holly Stuart ihstuart@ci.banning.ca.us ! Director of Public Works Management Analyst I I ! I------------------------L-----···-·---·-----' ---------------------! ------·-·------------··--··----jAMER JAKHER I Todd Parton 1 tparton@ci.beaumont.ca.us BEAUMONT -~IP-ub-lic Works Director/City Engineer ~City Manager . [ BLYTHE !ARMANDO BALDIZZONE . ··-··I --------·--------I 550 E. 6th Street Beaumont 92223 235 North Broadway ! Director of Public Works Blythe 92225 I t' --·-··-··----·-----·----___ L ··-·-----------· CVAG !MARTIN MAGANA 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200 1 Director of Transportation ,,_ __ -----------Palm Desert 92260 1 I ----------+.-----··--· I ---.. : mthornton@tkeengineering.com CALIMESA 1LORI ASKEW 1Michael Thornton 908 Park A.venue . ! Public Works Director I City E.ngineer , . j JI\.~ k . I Calimesa 92320 L Ll r I --lTI e k.I ;~L:!~~tr~et.-6~~ Floor --:~:~i1~~~c~~Assistance Planner 1---·--·-·-------·-___ _J__ ____ . __ San Bernardino 92401-1400 I CANYON LAKE 31516 Railroad Canyon Road Canyon Lake 92587 ---------------------CATHEDRAL CITY 68-700 Avenida Lalo Guerrero Cathedral City 92234 -----COACHELLA 1515 Sixth Street Coachella 92236 CORONA 400 South Vicentia Avenue Corona 92882 ------~-------·---·---·------DESERT HOT SPRINGS 65-950 Pierson Boulevard Desert Hot Springs 92240 EASTVALE ------·:AARON PALMER _____ ---+ i iJOHN CORELLA Ism Simons -------isimons@cathedr-al-ci-ty-.g-o-v------1--I City Manager I ! City Engineer I Senior Engineer I I I ,JONATHAN HOY ----I Maritza Martinez .. I City Engineer i Interim Public Works Director ·jNELSONNELSON -----------:11..inda Bazmi ,Public Works Director/City Engineer Senior Engineer I I --------1DANIEL PORRAS . -·--"!Richard Kopecky :Public Works Manager 1Contract City Engineer i I .L_ -----·-·--·--··-----------1----------!JOE INDRAWAN Craig Bradshaw mmartinez@coachella.org -t-:-:· --I Linda.bazmi@CoronaCA.gov ! rkopecky@cityofdhs.org : cbradshaw@eastvaleca.gov 12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910 Eastvale 91752 ,HEMET 445 East Florida Avenue Hemet 92543 City Engineer ; : --i i ' I ' .. ---·--··----··--····-----------+-------·--------·, ---·-----------·---------------· !NINO ABAD ;Alexander P. Meyerhoff Ameyerhoff@cityofhemet.org 1 Acting Director of Engineering : City Manager : , I i PLEASE SIGN IN SIGNATURE & EMAIL ~ t11~flf.~A!J .o~ --V---1<-if s~@ (} tfSOri;.liti~~ ~--~~£,() INDIAN WELLS 44-950 Eldorado Drive Indian Wells 92210-7497 iKEN SEUMALO CHAIR I Public Works Director /~d~ ,,,-1 9/18/2017 .,. CITY TAC MEMBER ALTERNATE TAC SEPTEMBER 18, 2017 PRINT NAME INDIO !TIMOTHY T. WASSIL II Eric Weck ]eweck@indio.org 100 Civic Center Mall !Public Works Director Principal Civil Engineer I ] Indio 92201 JURUPA-VALLEY ----t;TEVE LORISO . -!Gary Thompson 1gthompson@jurupavalley.org l1·-8930 Limonite Avenue Director of Public Works/City I City Manager Jurupa Valley 92509 Engineer ! -----iED-WIMMER PLEASE SIGN IN =t "f,IL~ 5.1 l Q ,;,L.~ ·_oX!!_._ 78-495Calle·T·ampico IPrincipalEngineer i P/C ... --·Oi~A .::.~~O #/.,,,/ ___ LaQuinta92253 I I V V:~:_._~ ~~ ~;~~~~~nR;re:t--l~~~n~~;=ELL 1R --(} -;t',,,d(}() b-;~il<? /~~,"ci:nu~.o Lake Elsinore 92530 I 1 ! /_)~ _I_~ MENIFEE JONATHAN SMITH !Steve Glynn ------fsglynn@cityofmeliiiee:llS ___ ---+--£--/----~ -JS....~ -f i/£ ____ _ 29714 Haun Road Public Works Director/City Engineer i I ' ' ~ Menifee 92586 ----·-_ ----~---________ _i ______ _ _ _ Ctr'jt£MtZJl/{1v=,.U7 MORENO VALLEY ERIC LEWIS Michael Lloyd lmichaell@moval.org P.O.Box 88005 11Transportation Division Manager I !Engineering Division 'Engineer Moreno Valley 92552 City Traffic Engineer~ !Manager/Assistant City~ MURRIETA BOBMOEHLING .,__.. JeffHitc_h___ ljhitch@m~rri r .. --·--..ri.£_~ -c;--~,--o--One Town Square City Engineer jPublic Works Construction I ~ _ . M.. .. ~ .. _l_ \ "'-!; Murrieta 92562 I Manager _ L _ __ , __ Al\,~\_[ 1~ ~ ('C1,_L _..j NORCO !CHAD BLAIS !Bill Thompson bthompson@ci.norco.ca.us I 2870 Clark Avenue ]Public Works Director iWater and Sewer Utilities I , Norco 92860 , 1 ----·-------------------1--------·-·------------------' PALM DESERT IBO CHE 73-510 Fred Waring Drive City Engi Palm Desert 92260 ---------··----------I -1<-----'·-----------------~---------------PALM SPRINGS jTOM GARCIA 3200 East Tahquitz Canyon Way !Director of Engineering/City f( Senior Civil Engineer Palm Springs 92262 !Engineer j PVVTA____________ 1' K. GEORGE COLANGELI !Dale Reynolds lpvtss@yahoo~com -· ---------L L --~~~----------415 N. Main Street , Trans it General Manager Blythe 92225 PERRIS -TRI LAKE CONSULTANTS 24 S. D Street, Suite 100 Perris 92570 -------RTA 1825 Third Street Riverside 92517-1968 --------RANCHO MIRAGE 69-825 Highway 111 Rancho Mirage 92270 HABIB MOTLAGH -l!,"t;.~{~f~--I"""'"""""'"'''""'""" City Engineer ROHAN KURUPPU Planning and Programming Specialist MARK SAMBITO William-Enos -------------ri;iue@RanchoMirageCA.gov Director of Public Works 1 City Engineer · I 9/18/2017 TAC SEPTEMBER 18, 2017 PLEASE SIGN IN CITY TAC MEMBER ALTERNATE PRINT NAME SIGNATURE & EMAIL RIVERSIDE 1FARSHID MOHAMMAD! I Kris Martinez -IKmartinez@riversideca.gov --~, 3900 Main Street I VICE CHAIR 1 Public Works Director Riverside 92522 1 Engineering Manager I i RIVERSIDE COUNTY !PATRICIA ROMO jMojahed Salama--------Fnsalama@rivco.org --------------------------4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor l Director of Transportation ! Deputy Director of i Riverside 92501 I !Transportation i I ' ' SANJACINTO____________HABIB MOTLAGH + --------:.., ____________ _,___ ___ _ ~~~~;;~0J~;!_~_A:nue-,B-ldg-.A-_J~ty-E-ng-ine_e_r ____ _J_ ___________ [3_~~ ~"."J"in I ~~ ' SUNLINE I VACANT !Anita M. Petke Transitlapetke@sunline.org '7 I 32-505 Harry Oliver Trail i Planning Manager ' I ~~:;~~L:alms 92276 --tpATRiCKTHOMAS -------µ 1 41000 Main Street I Director of Public orks j Temecula 92590 __ i / 1 1W!LooMAif _________________ ----jDAN YORK ......,... !Matt Bennett 23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite 201 I Assistant City Manager/Director of 1 Wildomar 92595 I Public Works/City Engineer mbennett@cityofwildomar.org :O~~~:m~n-S-tre_e_t -------------~~!~~~~~!~s~o'::-~/ ~~~sr;~e~~nager Riverside 92501 ' ~ [tzeng@wrcog.cog.ca.us f AN\ ~H.~ v t.'° r--o~k ... vt.b C~-J ~ v\-rr ,./(p &t f,.Q" r :PAvL-~ ~~c....~.--14.ftf>, ~ F(ecJ f:{(mo{h,,J"-J.... AP.--A5>c~"" ~ ::So.sh /U~~ ~ -h eo\ 'A. e lAeo.11:) (j ( ,::, i"-1 . C<ryy\ ,Y1tc,k.er>"11@ l14t ~rzSvl hj,lei"'1 0lAf,6Tar(l{;rd-/ &ht a--1 ~ Edw~~d ~ e_/ara_ (!: r-lver-r; j.,_ Cc. • {) 0 V 41Y\L1~~/ c~J~eer-N/.}I CAn-5.ul h~ ~~ N tl V( r o u. lf (;? f<.;V<:.t> ,t!>J/'O ~ mt:J-r7Ht:~ L):;:l,r/ct _ /YI a.-"#1-7 .u.u.s@/J.~ r, N~'f\~,LD~L ~.fe-cQ~, c_a-t:j6V cp~l,~~e~¥(" S~vc\) o s V M"' \ €. \.. \(LAN ;11.a~ ~yJ/ fv~wre£rc~7.c-~7~v \Qc.-.. v-~'a. '"=-~c.-, 11-U;1.. . (JO v '"'"{C::.V\e $c:5. c.~. so~ (Vl.«~ .(~~t~ CffY D-A.1tn/ 9/18/2017 MINUTES TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Monday, May 15, 2017 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was called to order by Chair Ken Seumalo at 10:30 a.m. at the Riverside County Transportation Commission, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501. 2. SELF -INTRODUCTIONS Members Present: Amer Attar, City of Temecula Bo Chen, City of Palm Desert John Corella, City of Cathedral City William Enos, City of Rancho Mirage Brad Fagrell, City of Lake Elsinore Marcus Fuller, City of Palm Springs Joe lndrawan, City of Eastvale Tim Jonasson, City of La Quinta Eric Lewis, City of Moreno Valley Steve Loriso, City ofJurupa Valley Bob Moehling, City of Murrieta Farshid Mohammadi, City of Riverside Nelson Nelson, City of Corona Ken Seumalo, City of Indian Wells Patrick Thomas, City of Temecula Michael Thornton, City of Calimesa Sean Yeung, Caltrans Dan York, City of Wildomar Others Present: Fred Alamolhoda, LAE Associates Grace Alvarez, RCTC Brad Brophy, Tri-Lake Consultants Chigo Dike, Caltrans Ati Eskandari, Sustainable Civil Engineering Solutions Cresencio Garcia, Caltrans Tom Garcia, City of Palm Springs Jillian Guizado, RCTC Aaron Hake, RCTC Chenxia Li, RTA Julia Lippe -Klein, SCAG Martha Masters, RCTC Shirley Medina, RCTC Lorelle Moe -Luna, RCTC Roy Null, Riverside County Paul Rodriguez, Rodriguez Consulting Group Derek Wieske, City of Hemet Technical Advisory Committee Meeting May 15, 2017 Page 2 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/S/C (Mohammadi/Magana) to approve the January 23 and March 20, 2017 minutes as submitted. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. 5. SCAG ATP GO HUMAN ENCOURAGEMENT CAMPAIGN PRESENTATION — SCAG STAFF Julie Lippe -Klein, Assistant Planner, Active Transportation &Special Programs, Southern California Association of Governments, provided a PowerPoint presentation regarding the Southern California Active Transportation Safety & Encouragement Campaign. 6. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Aaron Hake, RCTC, reviewed several bills that are summarized in his staff report and he responded to various questions. 7. ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM UPDATE Lorelle Moe -Luna, RCTC, reported that SB 1 will make $100 Million available annually beginning in FY 17/18. Projects from ATP Cycle 3 were just approved in Dec 2016 for the statewide selection and March 2017 for the MPO selection and are programmed for F Y19/20 and 20/21. Since SB1 funds for ATP will be available beginning 17/18, CTC staff in their report (going to the Commission this week) is recommending that the available funding for SB1 for FY 17/18 and 18/19 be made available for projects that have already been approved in Cycle 3 that can deliver earlier than currently programmed or for projects that applied in Cycle 3 but were not selected for funding. CTC staff is recommending that guidelines for this Call for Projects be approved at the June CTC meeting with an application deadline in August 2017. This call will have a total of $200M available (all state funds); $120M will be selected at the state level and $80M will be selected at the MPO level. RCTC staff is going to be working closely with SCAG over the next couple of months to monitor which projects from our county are likely to be funded. In the coming weeks, we will be contacting the applicants who scored at least 70 points in Cycle 3 to verify their project status and whether the projects that were just awarded can be delivered (allocated) earlier than 2019 using these state funds. Rails -to -Trails Conservancy contacted us to conduct an Active Transportation Technical Assistance workshop on June 1st. They received funding from the CA Endowment to provide this technical assistance that is geared towards providing technical assistance to disadvantaged communities seeking funding for active transportation projects, not necessarily for the ATP Program specifically Technical Advisory Committee Meeting May 15, 2017 Page 3 but also for other grant programs such as Urban Greening. Everyone is welcome to attend the workshop on June 1st (you don't have to be a DAC), however, they envision that follow up assistance will also be available, which would target disadvantaged communities. Basically, the technical assistance is intended to assist project applicants from the initial steps of project development (i.e., how to select a project and prioritize projects) to analyzing the data (e.g. safety, public health data, etc.) and developing an effective project or plan. Attached to the workshop flyer is a quick five question survey that we would like for you to complete and leave with us before you leave today so that we can provide them with feedback on how to best tailor their workshop agenda to the needs of our cities. 8. CALTRANS LOCAL ASSISTANCE UPDATE Sean Yeung, Caltrans Local Assistance, reminded the TAC members that in early April Caltrans reported that all agencies would need a Buy America waiver for vehicle purchases. No agencies requested a waiver. Caltrans also asked agencies to respond if they were not awarded the last round of SSARP project call because CTC had informed Caltrans that it had an extra $7.7 Million. Caltrans notified the 10 agencies whose projects were not awarded the first time that they would be awarded. He reported that the paperwork has been processed, which is at Local Assistance in Sacramento, and it is being forwarded to the June 2017 CTC meeting. Another round of inactive projects was posted on the Local Assistance web page on April 28. If a project is listed in red stating it's inactive, Local Assistance would need an invoice by Friday, May 19. There are 28 projects in the Riverside/San Bernardino area. For the next round of inactive projects, the due date for invoicing is August 21. Mr. Yeung also stated that regarding the ATP program, cycle 3, according to the program guidelines, all projects should be done and have a closeout package submitted by no later than September 30, 2021. [Note: this was clarified after the meeting and it was determined that Sean mistakenly said ATP Cycle 3, however in fact he was referring to older SRTS projects.] He said he will send a new Local Assistance staff assignment sheet to the local agencies. He pointed out there are two additional seniors. One is Chad Yang, Construction Oversight Engineer, who will have oversight of Riverside County and San Bernardino. The other person is David Lee, District Local Assistance Planner, who will handle local assistance engineer matters with Sean Yeung. Aaron Burton is the Environmental Specialist, also working in Local Assistance. 9. FEDERAL OBLIGATION PLAN UPDATE Martha Masters, RCTC, stated it is the Commission's goal to help obligate 100 percent of its federal apportionment every year. She drew attention to the most recent FFY 2016/17 Obligation Plan attached to her staff report and said that RCTC and Caltrans meet every month to go over the report Technical Advisory Committee Meeting May 15, 2017 Page 4 to discuss the status of CMAQ and RSTP projects awarded through various call for projects. She encouraged the TAC members to continue the federal aid process and contact RCTC staff if you have any questions or concerns. She believes 69 percent of the planned obligations have a good chance of securing E-76 approvals totaling $129 Million. She further stated that RCTC will be working closely with Caltrans and other County Commissions to determine if RCTC will need an apportionment and/or OA loan from another county to ensure our projects are obligated. She also encouraged the TAC to let her know if there are any inaccuracies in the attachments to her staff report so it can be updated. 10. 2017 FTIP UPDATE Martha Masters reported that as of today, the Southern California Association of Governments has processed four formal amendments; two consistency amendments associated to the 2016 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy amendments; and three administrative modifications. All formal amendments with the exception of Amendment 8 have received the reviewing agencies conformity approvals; consistency Amendment 3 is expected to be approved in June/July 2017 and consistency Amendment 7 in August/September 2017. The next amendment is an administrative modification (17-10) and is due to SCAG on May 23. 11. SB 821 UPDATE Ms. Masters reported that RCTC released the call for projects on February 6. The cities within the county and the county itself were notified that an estimated $3,467,784 would be available for programming in FY 2017/18. Commission staff held a SB 821 Technical Workshop on February 16. Proposals were due April 27. The Commission received 34 project proposals totaling $6,420,979 in SB 821 funding requests. The evaluation committee, comprised of six members representing Caltrans District 8, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments, the city of Indian Wells, Riverside Transit Agency, San Bernardino County Transportation Authority, and the Western Riverside Council of Governments. The evaluation committee met and reviewed the proposals. The evaluation committee recommendations will be presented to the Budget and Implementation Committee on May 22 and will be forwarded to the Commission June 14 for final approval. Staff will notify the TAC once the Budget and Implementation Committee agenda is posted online. 12. MAY COMMISSION HIGHLIGHTS • Shirley Medina, RCTC, reported that the May Commission meeting included a public hearing for its proposed budget. • There was a lengthy review of the 1-15 Express Lanes, the SR-91 project completion plans. • 2017 Series A sales tax revenue bonds and it also includes the TIFIA loan, which is still in process. • The Long Range Transportation Plan consultant selection was awarded to VRPA Technologies. Staff will give updates to the TAC and request input from the TAC. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting May 15, 2017 Page 5 13. OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS Tim Jonasson announced his impending retirement. Derek Wieske, City of Hemet, introduced himself to the TAC. Lorelle Moe -Luna, reminded the TAC that John Standiford, RCTC's Deputy Executive Director, recently provided an overview and presentation on the Regional Truck Study that RCTC is undergoing and stated that staff will update the TAC regularly on the status of that project. The study will kick off this month with a meeting on Thursday, May 25, 1:00. She said if any of the cities are interested in joining the study advisory team for the Regional Truck Study, please let her know and she will send out a reminder email. She thanked the agencies that submitted Measure A CIPs. There are still a few that have not submitted and encouraged them to let her know if they need additional time. The Chair reminded the TAC that the next meeting will be July 17, 10:30 in the CVAG Board Room. 14. OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business presented. 15. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee, the meeting adjourned at approximately 10:47 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Shirley Medina Planning and Programming Director TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Monday, July 17, 2017 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting of the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) was called to order by Lorelle Moe-Luna, RCTC, at 10:35 a.m. at the Coachella Valley Association of Governments, 73710 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260. 2. SELF-INTRODUCTIONS Members Present: Lori Askew, City of Calimesa Amer Attar, City of Temecula Linda Bazmi, City of Corona John Corella, City of Cathedral City Joe Indrawan, City of Eastvale David Lee, Caltrans Eric Lewis, City of Moreno Valley Martin Magana, CVAG Bob Moehling, City of Murrieta Ron Moreno, City of Palm Desert Anita Petke, SunLine Patricia Romo, County of Riverside Mark Sabito, Rancho Mirage Patrick Thomas, City of Temecula Timothy T. Wassil, City of Indio Ed Wimmer, City of La Quinta Others Present: Grace Alvarez, RCTC Toyen Blake, City of Indio Brad Brophy, Cities of Perris and San Jacinto Daniel Ramirez-Cornejo, WRCOG Tom Garcia, City of Palm Springs Shirley Gooding, RCTC Aaron Hake, RCTC Mike Heath, TKE Engineering Heather Horning, City of Palm Desert Chenxia Li, RTA Martha Masters, RCTC Lorelle Moe-Luna, RCTC Roy Null, Riverside County LeGrand Velez, CVAG Chad Yang, Caltrans Technical Advisory Committee Meeting July 17, 2017 Page 2 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Due to lack of a quorum, approval of the May 15, 2017 minutes was deferred to the next meeting. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. 5. CALTRANS LOCAL ASSISTANCE UPDATE David Lee, Caltrans Local Assistance, provided a July 13, 2017 letter to cities and counties, Metropolitan Planning Organizations, and Regional Transportation Planning Agencies r egarding the implementation of the latest earmark repurposing by Caltrans. He also provided a CTC Senate Bill 1 Workgroup Membership Form, which he asked the TAC members to complete. He announced an Emergency Relief training program August 29 at the district office. He also stated that inactive projects invoices are due August 21 for the year-end fiscal year. Mr. Lee stated he replaced Sean Yeung as the DLAE. He further stated he will try to visit all the local agencies throughout Riverside and San Bernardino counties. 6. CALTRANS LOCAL ASSISTANCE CONTRACT OVERSIGHT PRESENTATION BY CHAD YANG, P.E. 1 Chad Yang, Construction Oversight Engineer for Districts 8 and 9 at Caltrans Headquarters, introduced the construction oversight program, which provides construction oversight for federal-aid funded projects that are administered by local agencies off the state highway system. His role is to identify the projects to be reviewed, perform the review, issue review findings, monitor local agencies for corrective action, and provide any guidance or training required. The goal is to keep local agencies in compliance with federal requirements. Lorelle Moe Luna pointed out the updated Caltrans Local Assistance staff assignments included in the agenda along with Exhibit 19-A Construction Review Checklist. 7. SB 1 OVERVIEW AND UPDATE Aaron Hake, RCTC, provided a Senate Bill 1 Update and responded to various questions. Ms. Moe-Luna reported there is a workshop scheduled July 17 regarding the Trade Corridors and two other workshops on Friday, July 21st regarding the Solutions for Congested Corridors and the Local Partnership Program. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting July 17, 2017 Page 3 8. SB 1 LOCAL STREETS AND ROADS UPDATE Grace Alvarez provided a summary of the draft SB 1 Local Streets and Roads Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) and stated that the new program is similar to the Measure A Local Streets and Roads as it requires a separate budgetary account to track revenues and expenditures for the RMRA; requires the establishment of a Maintenance of Effort (MOE) based on discretionary general fund expenditures for local streets and roads from FY 2010-2012; and requires the submittal of a Capital Improvement Program (CIP), starting in FY 2018 that must include proof of the local agency budgetary approval such as Council/Board resolution and/or Council/Board minutes, and the excerpt of the RMRA CIP budget. The CIP listing will utilize the current State Department of Finance revenue projections for FY 2018. Additionally, there is a requirement for annual reporting on completed and/or fully operational projects due on October 2, 2018 and eve ry year thereafter. The LSR guidelines have flexibility to make changes to the CIPs after submittal to the CTC but do require justification through the annual reporting. Construction project signs are encouraged, where feasible to make the public know the project is funded through the increase in transportation taxes. SB 1 also calls for an apprenticeship program for RMRA LSR funded projects. Ms. Alvarez responded to several questions from the TAC regarding the guidelines. 9. SB 1 LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM UPDATE Grace Alvarez, RCTC, provided a quick summary of the Local Partnership Program (LPP) Guidelines under development that will reward self-help counties that have authority to collect and administer transportation taxes as well as counties with transportation fees, such as the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Program in Riverside County. The LPP program will have a 50 percent competitive program and a 50 percent formula program. A similar LPP was implemented as part of the Prop 1B funding . 10. SB 1 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM AUGMENTATION UPDATE Lorelle Moe-Luna reported that the Active Transportation Program (ATP) received a total of $200 million for this fiscal year. She provided a recap of ATP Cycle 3 that has about $264 million available for programming in FY 2020/21. It is broken out into 60 percent decided by the CTC (50 percent for statewide competition and ten percent set aside for rural). Three projects from Riverside County were selected for the statewide program – the projects were from Moreno Valley, La Quinta, and Desert Hot Springs. The remaining 40 percent is allocated to the MPOs and SCAG receives about half of those funds and are split based on formula for the six counties in the SCAG region. In Cycle 3, SCAG received about $53 million, 95 percent of which goes towards implementation projects , which can include infrastructure or non-infrastructure programs. SCAG distributes the implementation funds and they do a geographic equity split. Riverside County receives about 12 percent or $6.6 million. The Commission approved RCTC’s recommendation of those funds, which went to County Public Health, Technical Advisory Committee Meeting July 17, 2017 Page 4 Jurupa Valley, and CVAG. The remaining five percent went towards a 2016 sustainability planning grants program. In Riverside County, Wildomar and County Public Health received funds. Ms. Moe-Luna said SB 1 funds have the same process, just different numbers. The CTC opened the ATP Cycle 3 - Augmentation Call for Projects for projects submitted in Cycle 3 that can be implemented in FY 2018 and FY 2019. There will be $200 million available; however, $8 million will go towards the California Conservation Corps per legislation ($4 million annually). For that call, you have to be able to advance your project in fiscal years 2018 and 2019 to qualify. Only projects that competed for the ATP Cycle 3 will be considered for the SB 1 ATP augmentation. The CTC supplemental application is due August 1 and all applicants must submit a supplemental application to the CTC even if there are not any scheduled changes or any prime changes. She further reported that the priority order the CTC will consider is 1) original ATP score; and 2) advance of all phases to fiscal years 2018 and 2019. If there is capacity that opens up in 2020 or 2021, the CTC may allow additional funds for that as well. SCAG released a call for projects for the Sustainability Planning Grant, the 2017 Active Transportation Call for Projects for planning and non -infrastructure programs. For this call, new projects may be submitted. There will be workshop July 20 for those who are interested in applying for th e planning grant. Applications are due August 31. 11. SB 1 PLANNING GRANTS UPDATE Martha Masters, RCTC, stated that through SB 1, $25 million will be set aside annually for sustainable communities grants and approximately $7 million annually for 3 years for the adaptation planning grants. The draft guidelines were posted July 13 on the Caltrans website. The website address for the draft guidelines, the contact person, and more information is on the handout we have provided you today. Caltrans staff held workshops on June 26 in Los Angeles and June 27 in Sacramento. The handout is a copy of the PowerPoint slides presented at those workshops. Comments on the draft guidelines are due to Caltrans by close of business July 25 to regional.planning.grants@dot.ca.gov. The final draft of the guidelines will be released at the beginning of August for a formal 30 -day comment period. Two additional workshops will also be held before the grant guidelines are finalized and released. Ms. Masters provided a summary of the sustainable communities’ grant based on the draft guidelines. She stated that eligible primary applications include MPOs with sub applicants, RTPAs, Transit agencies, cities and counties, and native American tribal governments. There is an 11.47 percent match requirement that can be cash or in-kind. Applicants should demonstrate how the proposed effort would identify and address mobility deficiencies in the multimodal transportation system, encourage stakeholder collaboration, involve active community engagement, coordinate transportation and land use planning and ultimately result in programmed system improvements. Eligible activities and expenses include data gathering and analysis, planning consultants, conceptual drawings and design, community surveys, meetings, and focus groups, bilingual services for interpreting and/or translation services for meetings, and community/stakeholder advisory groups. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting July 17, 2017 Page 5 She then provided a summary of the adaptation planning grant based on the draft guidelines and said eligible primary applicants include MPOs with sub applicants, RTPAs, transit agencies, cities and counties, native American tribal governments, local and regional agencies, and special districts. The match requirement is 11.47 percent as well. Examples of adaptation planning grant project types include resiliency studies, climate vulnerability assessments, adaptation plans, natural and green infrastructure adaptation plans, and update of existing plans to incorporate adaptation. Final Guidelines will be adopted in early September and applications will be due October 20 with program adoption sometime in December. She pointed out that the contacts are on the Caltrans PowerPoint that was provided. 12. SB 1 STIP UPDATE Grace Alvarez reported that the 2018 STIP will receive approximately $82.5 million annually f rom SB 1 STIP augmentation. The 2018 STIP process started in June when the fund estimate was presented to the CTC; the process will continue through December 2017 when the 2018 STIP projects are due to the CTC. The final approval by the CTC is in the early spring 2018. Based on the fund estimate provided by the CTC staff in June, Riverside County will receive approximately $102 million during the five year STIP cycle (2018/19 – 2022/23), which is traditionally split between the three geographic areas in Riverside County, Western, Coachella, and Palo Verde Valley. Funding priority will be given to projects that were delayed through lack of fund estimate during the 2016 STIP, which in Riverside County included the French Valley Parkway Interchange in Temecula. 13. JULY COMMISSION HIGHLIGHTS Ms. Moe-Luna reported Commission highlights: 1) STIP update was approved 2) CTC ATP Program 3) Recommendations for 2018 SB 821 bicycle and pedestrian program were approved 4) Measure A CIP plans for local streets and roads were approved There will not be a Commission meeting in August. There will be a joint commission meeting with RCA group August 28. 14. OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS A suggestion was made to clarify at the next meeting what Caltrans will accept as a current pavement condition index (PCI), and if it is an in depth study, which used to be every five years. It would be good for the TAC to know when they need to have a current PCI report. Another suggestion was made to advise the TAC what formula was used as a basis for SB 1 Local Streets and Roads. If the funding distribution is based on lane miles, when and how can agencies update their lane miles to get a better distribution. Technical Advisory Committee Meeting July 17, 2017 Page 6 LoreIle Moe -Luna said RCTC staff will provide the TAC with SB 1 program updates at future TAC meetings. In the meantime, agencies may contact RCTC staff with questions or feel free to contact the CTC directly. 15. OTHER BUSINESS There was no other business presented. 16. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for consideration by the Technical Advisory Committee, the meeting adjourned at approximately 11:50 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Shirley Medina Planning and Programming Director AGENDA ITEM 5 DATE: September 18, 2017 TO: TAC Members, Project Consultants, and Agency Staff FROM: Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager RE: 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) has started the process for the 2019 FTIP, initiated by the release of the draft 2019 FTIP Guidelines on July 19, 2017, and recently approved by the SCAG Regional Council on September 7. The guidelines help ensure that all current legal, administrative and technical requirements are met. The 2019 FTIP Guidelines are available online at: http://ftip.scag.ca.gov/Documents/Draft2019FTIPGuidelines.pdf The 2019 FTIP has an aggressive schedule for which we ask your collaboration to complete a thorough submittal to SCAG by the deadline of January 9, 2018. A key first action for Riverside County member cities is to update the existing projects in the 2017 FTIP that need to be carried over into the new 2019 FTIP, add new projects, remove projects, and report project completion. RCTC staff is available at your request to meet with you on an individual basis to discuss your projects for the 2019 FTIP. Contact staff immediately if you would like to schedule a meeting to discuss the 2019 FTIP process. EXISTING PROJECT UPDATES – DUE TO RCTC OCTOBER 2, 2017 To update your existing projects for carry over to the 2019 FTIP, mark-up the TIP sheet in red pen and indicate your changes as you have in the past. The existing projects as provided to you are consistent with the 2016 RTP/SCS and/or the 2016 RTP/SCS A-1 through A-2. If the project update deviates from the latest amendment to the 2016 RTP/SCS, please indicate so and provide the model changes that will trigger the remodel of the project through the 2019 FTIP. Example: A non-exempt project was planned to be completed in 2019 so it was modeled through the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) 2019 modeling year. Plans have changed due to delays and the completion year will now be revised from 2019 to 2023 through the 2019 FTIP process. Since the completion year is being updated and this is a non-exempt project this triggers a remodel through the 2019 FTIP and the modeling year will now be 2023. The requested updates should verify and/or update the following: 1. Lead agency. 2. Route and post mile limit only applicable to the State Highway System. 3. Environmental document type (refer to Page 7 (PDF page 19) of the guidelines for environmental document types) and anticipated and/or actual environmental sign-off date. 4. For capacity enhancing projects over one mile in length (continuous) AND federally funded with funding for right-of-way and construction programmed in the quadrennial years (first four years 18/19-21/22) of the 2019 FTIP, please provide excerpts from the approved environmental document where the project sponsor considered the incorporation of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) or other operational management strategies into the project . If the TDMs are not feasible, and they are documented, please provide the statement of overriding considerations (refer to pages 21-22 of the guidelines for additional details (PDF pages 33-34)). 5. Modeling Years under the 2019 FTIP are in the process of changing for all Riverside County Air Basins (except Mojave Desert); please refer to Page No’s 45-48 of the guidelines (PDF pages 62- 65). 6. Verify the total project cost based on year of expenditure. 7. Base your projected status of the project as of September 2018 which is when the 2019 FTIP will be presented to the SCAG Regional Council for approval. 8. Project schedule - write the start and end dates (mm/dd/year) for PA&ED, PS&E, R/W, and the Construction phases, including the closest and realistic anticipated completion year as it is pivotal for the modeling of the project in the FTIP, and subsequently, for the approval of the environmental document. 9. The project description should be consistent with the current or developing Environmental Document/Project Report. 10. Provide accurate and complete funding for all required phases (if the project is fully funded). A project can also be programmed as ‘PA&ED Only’ in the FTIP but will most likely not be modeled. 11. Accurate modeling details (if applicable) refer to Pages 51-55 (PDF pages 68-72) of the guidelines for specific modeling requirements for project types/categories. NEW PROJECTS - DUE TO RCTC OCTOBER 9, 2017 For new projects, please use the applicable project form depending on the type of project you are adding, and ensure the vicinity map, project exhibits, and modeling details are included with your submittal for all capacity enhancing projects and capacity enhancing grade separation projects. For transit service expansion, provide all the new and/or expanded route details and map per pages 54-55 (PDF pages 71-72) of the draft guidelines. Please return the FTIP project sheets for existing projects even if there are no changes so we may verify your concurrence with the current programming (simply mark “no changes” on the FTIP project sheet). October 2 is the deadline for submittal of existing projects. Feel free to contact Martha Masters with any questions regarding projects on the state highway and for transit projects, and Lorelle Moe-Luna with any questions regarding the local highway system. The main line to reach the Planning and Programming Department staff is (951) 787-7141. The following documents were emailed to TAC members , TAC alternates, and other agency staff involved in FTIP projects on September 1, 2017: 1. 2019 FTIP Guidelines 2. 2017 FTIP Project Listings and Modeling Details (per system and agency) 3. Project information for new FTIP projects - 2019 FTIP What is the FTIP? • The short-range program (6 years) that implements projects from the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). • It includes regionally significant projects and/or programs that require federal approvals, such as environmental documents, freeway connections and/or federal funding. • It is updated every two years to be consistent with the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). c.. ~ u.. O'I .-I 0 N V) V) cu u 0 I... Q. Q. -I- Li. E ro ..... tlO 0 ..... a.. ..., c: Q) E ~ 0 ..... a. E c: 0 :;::; ro ..., ..... 0 a. "' c: ro ..... I- Q) "C -~ ..., ro ..., Vl ro ..... Q) "C Q) LI.. * 2019 FTIP SCAG's Role in the FTIP Development Process • Step 1-Develop the FTIP Guidelines Guidelines assist in the development of the county TIPs that fulfill the legal, administrative and technical requirements prescribed by the law. Guidelines include the FTIP development schedule. Project selection is done through a bottom up approach. CTC's are tasked with project selection and funding. • Step 2 -Make FTIP database available for the CTC's to submit their projects • Step 3 -Analyze the project submittals • Step 4 -Provide analytical feedback to the CTCs 2019 FTIP SCAG's Role in the FTIP Development Process (cont'd) • Step 5 -Complete the analysis and run the Transportation Model for conformity • Step 6-SCAG Board approval for release of Draft FTIP • Step 7 -Open Public Review Period - 2 Public Hearings -30 Day comment period -Address public comments -Finalize the FTIP • Step 8-SCAG Board Approval of Final FTIP / • Step 9 -Federal Agencies Approval (Conforrpity Determination) 2019 FTIP Conformity Determination • Through the FTIP process, SCAG secures the conformity determination from the federal reviewing agencies for the six counties it represents. • Conformity determination requires: 1. Consistency with the approved RTP/SCS 2. Regional emission analysis for all projects in the FTIP (based on model run) 3. Financially constraint (first four years of the FTIP) 4. Timely implementation of TCMs 5. lnteragency consultation and public in~0lvement (TCWG) and public outreach 2019 FTIP New 2019 FTIP Timeline • Current: 2017 FTIP (FY 2016/17 -2021/22) • Expires mid-Dec 2018 • New: 2019 FTIP (FY 2018/19-2023/24) • Takes effect mid-Dec 2018 ... We need to start the process nowl • Sept -Oct 2017: Local agencies to provide existing and new projects • Oct -Dec 2017: RCTC to review and update FTIP database • Jan 2018: Deadline to submit all 2019 FTIP projects to SCAG • Jan -Dec 2018: SCAG will need to analyze p~, conduct model run, hold public hearings, and receive federal approvals (col)formity determination 2019 FTIP Bottom-Up Approach • RCTC works with local agencies to update existing projects and receive information for new projects. • Existing FTIP project sheets (emailed on 9/1/17) Review for project deletion, completion, scope of work, and update project schedules Due to RCTC Oct 2, 2017 • New projects will be allowed in the FTIP as the update will include a concurrent 2016 RTP/SCS Amendment# 3 (consistency amendment) -Due to RCTC Oct 9, 2017 2019 FTIP What projects should you include in the FTIP? • Local agencies should decide which projects will be included, but it is required to include regionally significant projects, projects that require federal approval and/or federal-aid. • Projects submitted are usually local priority projects to be implemented in the next 5-10 years. • Considerations: • FTIP covers 6 years of programming • Years 1-4 =financially constrained • Projects programmed in Years 1 & 2 are committed funds • Projects in Years 3 & 4 are reasonably expected funds. • Years 5 & 6 = informational pu~ses only 2019 FTIP Type of Projects Included in the FTIP • All regionally significant projects and programs requiring federal action are required to be included in the FTIP (e.g. even 100% locally funded projects). • For the purpose of transportation modeling and regional emissions analysis, a transportation facility project meeting one of the following criteria is considered regionally significant: • Freeways, state highways, principal arterials and major arterials -could be capacity increasing and/or non-capacity increasing (i.e., signal synchronization connecting 3 or more signals). • Routes that provide access to major activity centers such as amusement parks, regional shopping, military bases,/ airports and ports -new, realignments, widenings, and/or extensions:' 2019 FTIP Type of Projects Included in the FTIP (cont). • Goods movement routes, including truck routes and rail lines as well as rural agricultural routes. • lntermodal transfer facilities such as transit centers, rail stations, airports, and ports. • Fixed transit routes such as light and heavy rail, commuter rail, and express bus routes. 2019 FTIP Modeling Type Projects • All new capacity increasing projects must come from an approved RTP/SCS. • Changes to modeling years or project descriptions need to be incorporated into the RTP/SCS. • An RTP/SCS consistency amendment (2016 RTP/SCS Amendment #3) will be conducted in conjunction with the 2019 FTIP. The 2019 FTIP is a unique opportunity for the local agencies to submit new projects, remove projects and/or make major changes to state and local highways and transit projects that require modeling. SCAG does not usually perform an RTP/SCS amendment concurrent with the FTIP. 2019 FTIP Example of Project Delay impacting model years (different for ea. air basin) Project ID: RIV110501 "In Eastern Riverside County in the Coachella Valley -Date Palm Dr widening from 1-10 to Varner Rd: widening of Date Palm Dr from 2 to 6 lanes {3 lanes in ea direction) from 1-10 to Varner Rd including a box culvert spanning the Long Canyon Wash. Other improvements include additional turning lanes at intersections of Date Palm Dr & Varner Rd, traffic signalization, sidewalks, medians, and bike lanes." Current project completion year is 2024. SSAB model years: 2020, 2026, 2030, and 2040 Model year is 2026 in SSAB If the project completion was to change to 2027, ~ project will cross model years from 2026 to 2030 and will require an RTP/SCSfimendment, concurrent with the 2019 FTIP approval. 13 2019 FTIP Air Basins • There are three air basins in Riverside County • Mojave Desert Air Basin (MOAB): Blythe • Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB): Coachella Valley cities • South Coast Air Basin (SCAB): Western Riverside cities • Morongo and Pechanga are part of the SCAB • Each air basin has established model years depending on the approved transportation conformity budgets. O>)' "° n ,..,_,--,_ ~ ~ s~.:.·~ ~ S•n S.rn.,dino Mojave Desort Air Basin ,_ ~ ·~ ~.'--. · ... Rlverald• .. ·· ... Salton See Air Besln lmp•rial ( ;> a , \;A l4 2019 FTIP 2016 RTP/SCS -SCAB, SSAB Modeling Years • SCAB -2019, 2020, 2021, 2023, 2030, 2031, 2040 • SSAB (Coachella) -2020, 2026, 2030, 2040 Consider the model year when planning for the completion year (open to traffic and/or transit vehicle delivery) and attempt to have some flexibility for project delays without the need for an RTP/SCS amendment. The farther away the model years, the more flexibility to incorporate project delays without RTP Amendments. For example, a completion year delay from 2024 to 2027 in the SCAB can be incorporated through a formal am~ndment as the model year is 2030 regardless its completion in 2024 and/or 2027. Note: The MDAB in Riverside County (Blythe) is in ~attainment area, therefore, it is not subject to transportation conformity requirements. 2019 FTIP Possible 2019 FTIP Modeling Years The EPA is in the process of approving ozone and PM 2.5 budgets -this action will impact the model years for the SCAB and SSAB as follows: New model years for the SCAB would change to: 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2024, 2025,2027,2028,2030,2031,2040 New model years for the SSAB (Coachella) would change to: 2018, 2020, 2021, 2024, 2026,2030,2040 2019 FTIP Model Project Categories 1. Capacity increasing projects 2. Transit service: bus and rail (new and/or expanded service) 3. Intelligent Transportation Systems (Signal Sync projects >3 signals) 4. Transportation Control Measures -projects or programs that reduce vehicle use or change traffic flow or congestion conditions for the purpose of reducing emissions from transportation related sources and improving air quality (HOV, Toll Lanes, Park N Ride lots, etc.) 2019 FTIP Interchange Project Model Example: 1-15 Railroad Canyon Road IC and Widening -Interchange reconstruction projects that add capacity CcMty $ysltm ~ Rr.mdt s 13 I.Nd~ LAKE ElSINORE FTIP ID RTP IO ~ Pt.18 RN01020e RMl1020e 15 16.30 PME 21.00 1 ) Location, configuration, beginning and end points of the project and type of facility 2) Existing and proposed number of lanes in each direction 3) Posted speed limits Mc!cllq Nol!uid ~Dalt Erw. Dllt No 12'31/2027 Q&!2!/2017 Erw. Type EA.'FONSI ToUI Project Cost 7ml REPGM ~~ Pnij ~. AH1MlR CYN RO IC & NEWl-1~111.IN ST IC· WIDEN RRCYN RO UC FROM 7 T08lNS(Sll.!MERHlll OR· MISSION TR). RCNSTCT NB EXIT/ENTRY RA/.IPS TOHOOI< RAMPCNECTN TO GRAPE ST. WlOEN S8 ENTRY RAM? FROl.l 1 ·2 lNS. WIDEN SHLORS SB EXIT RAMP. WlOEN GRAPE ST TO CONST DEDICATED RT TN lN .\T NB HOOK RAMP ANO RR CYN RO. & CONS RAM? ACCELIOECEL LNS AT RR CYN RO (PH IX CONS NEW l-151FRANKl.IN ST IC, CONST AUX LN t.1JP lit ht!j)~.wg.Cl.QO"iTJ!'llnlpshNps.1spx?pid=RIVOt020Mod"4&lcx:l.-O CTC l.lodtir1g DHcnpaon: Unt$ HOV Acotss T Cills SlrMt IWnt lfllglh FIOlll To EJlMg Propostd Eg!KsLoo.i':ion Toi ~t Toll!.lltlhod loo.ltlcn we~ CnyRd. oo m1ts ~ OrlGrJ!>t s:. 500 ft EIO SummttM 5 00000 CJSh lmprovt<ntrt ~ Rtstnpt tmltlQ 5 ns ~ ~ 3WS !Ml Ins & 2W8 It~ un Ins W9R~CnyRd. .!Smits ~OrlG<aptS1 S9t•Arlft!llS 00000 CW\ ~ Otwlpoon: Widen frll<n 2 IO 3 W8 IMI l.\nts E9 RJ~ Clly Rd .15 miff ~ Cl'iG<IPI S: S8tiff'(11~ 00000 CW\ lmpnwtmtra0nct¢on: RtsllC>t tmltlQ 5ns n lolbin· 2E9 dV\J Ins. 1eeng1111n. & 2 ~ ltltun n EB~CnyRd. .Demits S8 Enl!y~ Au'oC.-0<.IC.uinoOt. 0.0000 cm ~ DHcnp0on: Wliltll frll<n 3 IO 4 Ins IO plV<!dt 3E81lvv lnl Mid I dtdiclttd EB nghl In I-15 NB Ototltrlll>On ln .2$ mltJ t.111· 15 NB RJ~ Cyn ticit hoot r~ 00000 CW> lmpnwtmtra ~ ConsllVCI NB tlll t~dtotl«i!Xlft r. (3 GP• I dtcllel;t~ In) l-1~CynRd.NBE.t~ .33mits 1-15 Gt'91Sl 0.0000 Cash ~~ N8tur.111"91t.1ign!OHl\ool:t#f\Pf!cMl-15&-IOGr1PfSl(.14mlt$10RRCynRd)-m.1cn1.11tn3ils(1Rl&2lt)@GtlC>tSI l-1~CynRd.N8Enwoot~ .30mlts Gt'l)tSl 1-15 00000 CW\ ~ ~ N8 tf'llY r~ tNignlO-. hOol: r.lmj) from GtlC)t St (.14misSIOAACynRd)10 l-1S, prwidft8 3 (2GP & 1HOV for ll'fl'OJ, 13 miff) lnl hom Grape SI~ 10 1 In 11 ma ..... 2019 FTIP Bus Transit Project Model Example: Sunline Transit Agency New Bus Service (Fixed-route & intercity I commuter bus) New bus service Expansion of existing bus service l ) Bus routes 2) Stop locations 3) Headway by time period for each direction 4) Boarding fare and transfer fare County System Amendment Lead Agency FTIP ID RTP ID Nework No Build Completion Env. Date Env. Type Tot Proj Cost Change Reason Date RIV T 0 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY RIV140822 3TL504 No 12131/2019 06/30/2015 CE 1735 C/O 2015 Description: IN COACHELLA VALLEY FOR SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY: PURCHASE OF TWO NEW BUSES AND OPERATIONS OF NEW BUS SERVICE THAT WILL DIRECTLY LINK DES ERT HOT SPRINGS AND PALM DESERT. SERVICE TO OPERATE ON WEEKDAYS AND WILL INCLUDE FOUR TRIPS IN THE MORNING {HOURLY) FROM DESERT HOT SP RINGS TO PALM DESERT AND FOUR TRIPS IN THE AFTERNOON {HOURLY) FROM PALM DESERT TO DESERT HOT SPRINGS. (CMAQ • $1,536K) Map Link: http://webapp.scag.ca.gov/TIP/maps/maps.aspx?pid=RIV140822&cid=4&1ock=O CTC Modeling Description: Bus Route Mode Park N Ride Location Stop Location 20 Bus Approx 23 stops each direction Trans I Mode ' Bus '..:J Route' 20 -s:op Loca:JOn' Approx 23 stops eact' direction Stop lnterva Time (m1nJtes)' 0 00 Stop Distance' 1 00 Fare' 1 00 Transfer Fee' 0 25 Park Ride LocatJOn Parking Cost 0 00 --Head':1af Pea~· 60 minutes Headv.ay Off Peak' n a 19 2019 FTIP Local Road & Arterial Project Model Example: HWY 111 Improvements -Local road & arterial improvements that add capacity (includes gap closures 1 /8 of mile or longer} 1} Project length, beginning and end points of the improvement 2) Existing and proposed number of lanes 3) New capacity by signal optimization or parking restriction if no lane addition 4) Specify if facility type changes with changes in number of lanes 5) Upgrade road system to Parkway CMy -~ LeadAgencf FTlPID RTPID Roole PMB PME MOOeilg No&jj ~Die Env.Dale Env.T~ T~PrqeaCost ChqeReason Rivers~ L 0 INOIO RIV151001 3A07031 0 0.00 0.00 No 12/30l2016 01/30/2016 CE 10920 CJO 2015 Pro, Oesefl)oon: IN EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR THE CITY OF INDIO· RECONSTRUCT AND IMPROVE HIGHWAY 111FROM760 FT WEST OF MADISON ST TO RUBIDOUX ST INCLUDING UPDATING ALL TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND UPDATE ALL SIDEWALKS, R AMPS AND DRIVEWAYS TO CURRENT ADA STANDARDS. WIDEN OF HIGHWAY 111FROM4 LANES (2 IN EACH DIR) T06LANES (31N EACH DIR). M~ lli: http1/Ne~p.scag ca.gov/TIPlmapslm~s.aspx?l)id:RIY151001&oo:4&1od=O CTC MOOeling Des~oon: Highway 111 lmi-oYEmEflt ~: Street Name lef'9111 From 6300 ft 760 Ft west of M4dlSM Street 213nes 11 each arm IO 3 Ins II each dmoon To Rubidoox Street Lanes HOV: Access T ~s ExiSlllg Pr~ Egressloca~ TolR3'.e TOIMe~ L~ 2 0.0000 C3sh 2019 FTIP Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) & Impacts on Air quality Conformity • TCMs -are transportation projects and/or programs committed to help improve air quality, regardless of the source of funding: • Transit and non-motorized modes • HOV lanes and their pricing alternatives • Information-based strategies • Timely Implementation of Committed TCMs: • Committed TCMs are projects with funding programmed in the first two years of FTIP in right-of-way and/or construction. • Substitution is required if a committed TCM cannot be implemented per original scope or will have a significant delay. • TCM substitution can be approved but it 7,St be a project with similar time frame and same or greater air qualj.tv benefits, as the project being substituted. 2019 FTIP Congestion Management Process (CMP) • The CMP only applies to federally funded projects for R/W and/or construction phase in the quadrennial years of the FTIP. • CMP requires that projects increasing SOV capacity by at least 1 mile or more AND are federally funded, need to consider the incorporation of travel demand management (TDM) strategies into the project. • If the TDMs are not feasible, a statement of overriding considerations is necessary to be included in the environmental document. • CMP measures include HOT, HOV, TCL, ramp meters, P-N-R lots, traffic signal synchronization, parking management system, bu,.ls priority system, reversible lanes, wide shoulders for bike and pedestrians in rural areas, dedicated bus lanes, bicycle facilities, and other pedestrian facilitie~/,/oA improvements. 2019 FTIP Performance Measures • Performance measures is a new requirement from MAP-21 that is now being implemented through the FAST Act. • The 2019 FTIP is required to comply with the new performance measures as well as any new subsequent amendments. • Through the modeling required of the 2019 FTIP, SCAG will analyze the projects for performance measures per the new performance measure targets adopted by the state. • Performance Measures are included in the 2019 FTIP Guidelines -found on page 10. 2019 FTIP Questions? Schedule a meeting with us © Local Projects: Lorelle Moe-Luna State Hwy/Transit Projects: Martha Masters AGENDA ITEM 6 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 6. AGENDA ITEM 7 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: September 18, 2017 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Lorelle Moe-Luna, Senior Management Analyst SUBJECT: Senate Bill 1 Funding Programs Update STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the July 17, 2017 TAC meeting, staff provided an overview of each funding program approved under Senate Bill (SB) 1 and stated that program updates would be provided as program guidelines are developed. Please refer to the attached SB 1 Funding Programs Update matrix for major milestones and deadlines. SENATE BILL 1: FUNDING PROGRAMS UPDATE Investment Category Available Funding Who Decides Eligible Projects Program Updates State Transit Assistance (STA) $15M (Formula to transit agencies)Caltrans Capital and Operating Formula to transit agencies. RCTC to approve with new SRTP. State Highway Maintenance (SHOPP) $226M statewide (Based on Need)Caltrans Maintenance, safety, operation, and rehab projects of state highway and bridges that do not add a new traffic lane to the system, advance mitigation projects Administered by Caltrans Transit & Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) $250M statewide (Competitive)CalSTA Transformative capital improvements that modernize CA's public transit network Oct 13, 2017: CalSTA to publish final program guidelines Oct 13, 2017: Call for Projects Jan 12, 2018: Applications due Commuter and Intercity Rail N/A to Riverside County $25M statewide (Formula to rail operators) CalSTA Projects from the 5 commuter rail providers and 3 intercity rail corridors Formula to rail agencies. Freeway Service Patrol (FSP)$1.2M* (Formula)TBD Freeway Service Patrol TBD Active Transportation (ATP) $100M statewide (Competitive)CTC/SCAG Bike and pedestrian improvements, planning, non-infrastructure programs Aug 1, 2017: Deadline to submit to CTC. Oct 16, 2017: CTC to approve Statewide/rural recommendations. (See ATP agenda item) Sep 25, 2017: RCTC staff to recommend MPO projects Budget & Implementation Committee. Dec 6, 2017: CTC to approve MPO recommendations. Local Streets & Roads $84.1M (Formula to cities)CTC Road Maintenance and Rehab, Safety, Railroad Grade Separations, Active Transportation, Traffic Control Devices Oct 16, 2017: Project lists due to submit to CTC. Dec 6, 2017: CTC to adopt list of eligible cities and counties Mid-Jan 2018: Controller FY18 Apportionments Begin Recommend League of Cities website for resources and recorded webinars. State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) $4.7M (Formula)CTC/RCTC Highways, Arterials, transit, rail, and ATP projects Sep 13, 2017: RCTC approves Western County STIP projects (see STIP Update agenda item) Sep 29, 2017: RCTC to submit proposed STIP projects to SCAG for Performance Measure Analyses Dec 15, 2017: Regions submit STIP package to CTC Mar 21, 2018: CTC to adopt 2018 STIP Local Partnership Program (LPP) (Self-Help match) $200M statewide (50% Formula / 50% Competitive) CTC Road Maintenance and Rehab, Safety, Railroad Grade Separations, Active Transportation, Traffic Control Devices Aug 16, 2017: CTC adopted draft program guidelines Oct 18, 2017: CTC to adopt final program guidelines Mar 2018: Applications due Solutions for Congested Corridors Program $250M statewide (Competitive)CTC Required to be in a Congested Corridor Plan. Highway improvements (capacity not eligible except for HOV/HOT lanes and non- general purpose lanes), local streets and roads, public transit, bike and ped facilities, restoration of preservation work that protects critical local habitat or open space. Dec 6, 2017: CTC to adopt draft program guidelines Jan 2018: CTC to adopt final program guidelines Feb 2018: Applications due Trade Corridor Enhancement Account $300M statewide (Competitive)CTC Corridor based freight projects nomicated by local agencies and the state Dec 6, 2017: CTC to adopt draft program guidelines Jan 2018: CTC to adopt final program guidelines Feb 2018: Applications due Local Planning Grants $250 million statewide (Competitive)Caltrans Sustainable Communities and Climate Adaptation Planning grants Early Sep 2017: Caltrans to release final program guidelines Oct 20, 2017: Applications due AGENDA ITEM 8 Handout AGENDA ITEM 9 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: September 25, 2017 TO: Budget and Implementation Committee FROM: Martha Masters, Management Analyst Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager THROUGH: Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director SUBJECT: Revision to the Fiscal Year 2017/18 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program Funding Recommendations STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Committee to: 1) Approve the Revised Fiscal Year (FY) 2017/18 SB 821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities program recommended projects (Attachment 1) in the amount of $3,343,187 to include an additional three projects in the cities of Lake Elsinore, La Quinta, and Temecula; 2) Direct staff to prepare and execute memorandums of understanding (MOUs) with the three additional project sponsors to outline the project schedule and local funding commitments; 3) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director to execute the MOUs with the project sponsors, pursuant to legal counsel review; and 4) Forward to the Commission for final action. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On July 12, 2017, the Commission approved twenty-one projects totaling $3,599,364 for SB 821 funding as indicated in Attachment 1. Due to the passage of SB 1, which provides an increase of $100 million annually to the Active Transportation Program (ATP), the California Transportation Commission (CTC) decided to augment the ATP Cycle 3 program. On June 30, 2017 the CTC released the ATP Cycle 3 Augmentation call for projects allowing agencies that applied under the recently concluded ATP Cycle 3 process the opportunity to apply for ATP Cycle 3 Augmentation funds made available from SB 1. Applications were due to the CTC on August 1, 2017. Staff was aware that projects submitted under the Commission’s SB 821 call for projects were also being submitted for the CTC’s ATP Cycle 3 Augmentation call for projects. In most cases, these ATP project applications represented larger projects, and the SB 821 project applications represented smaller portions of the ATP applications. Project sponsors strategically submitted larger projects for ATP funding since the ATP funding pot had a significant amount of funding available compared to the SB 821 funding pot. As a result, at the July 12, 2017 Commission meeting staff recommended to return to the Commission with a revision to the FY 2017/18 SB 821 funding recommendations if SB 821 funding was freed up from projects approved through the ATP Cycle 3 Augmentation. REVISED ALLOCATIONS: On August 31, 2017, the CTC notified agencies of the 2017 ATP Cycle 3 Augmentation recommendations that will be presented to the CTC at its October 18-19, 2017 meeting for final adoption. Two projects that were included in the SB 821 funding recommendations are being recommended for ATP Cycle 3 Augmentation funding: - County of Riverside - Clark Street Sidewalk project - City of Riverside - Carmine Street Sidewalk Improvements project Upon CTC’s approval of ATP Augmentation funds for the above two projects in October, staff recommends removing these projects from the FY 2017/18 SB 821 allocations. This action would free up a total of $724,000 of SB 821 funds that would be programmed to the following three next highest scored projects: Agency Project Title Allocation Lake Elsinore Palomar Multi-Use Trail $ 245,523 La Quinta Jefferson Street Sidewalk Gap Closure 90,000 Temecula Citywide Buffered Bike-Lane Striping 132,300 Total $ 467,823 The remaining FY 2017/18 SB 821 amount of $256,177 is not sufficient to fully fund the construction of the next two projects that were tied at a score of 33.67; therefore, based on prior practice it is recommended the remaining funds be reserved for the FY 2019/20 SB 821 Call for Projects. All project scores are included in Attachment 1. Summary of Revised Recommended SB 821 Allocations Coachella Valley Western Riverside Recommended Projects 7 15 Revised Total SB 821 Recommended Allocation $1,178,672 $2,164,515 Recommended Allocation % 35% 65% List of Revised FY 2017/18 SB 821 Recommended Projects Project Title Allocation Coachella Valley (7) Palm Desert Class II Bike and Golf Cart Lane Improvements - Citywide $ 85,000 Desert Hot Springs Desert View Sidewalk Project 293,000 La Quinta La Quinta High School ADA Improvements 109,500 Rancho Mirage ADA Pedestrian Access Ramp Upgrades on Highway 111 234,925 Palm Springs Racquet Club Road and Farrell Drive Missing Links Sidewalks 277,500 Indio Avenue 42 Sidewalk Gap Closure 88,748 *La Quinta Jefferson Street Sidewalk Gap Closure 90,000 Subtotal Coachella Valley Projects (35%) $ 1,178,672 Western Riverside (15) Eastvale 65th Bicycle Safety Enhancement $ 123,700 Riverside County Mayberry Ave Sidewalk Improvements (Stanford St. – Meridian St.) 244,000 Moreno Valley Gentian Avenue and Eucalyptus Avenue Class II Bike Lanes 49,000 Wildomar Grand Avenue Bike Lane – Phase I 270,000 Wildomar Grand Avenue Bike Lane – Phase II 214,000 Lake Elsinore Bicycle Lanes to Downtown 50,100 Lake Elsinore Machado Street Missing Link Bike Lanes 75,900 Riverside County Serfas Club Drive Sidewalk Improvements 307,500 Hemet Sidewalk and ADA Ramps – Alessandro Street 75,000 Lake Elsinore Chaney Street Missing Link Sidewalk 137,830 Lake Elsinore Sumner, Mohr and Davis Street Missing Link Sidewalk 97,953 Lake Elsinore W. Lakeshore Drive Missing Link Sidewalk 131,934 Lake Elsinore Mission Trail Missing Link Bike Lanes 9,775 *Lake Elsinore Palomar Multi-Use Trail 245,523 *Temecula Citywide Buffered Bike-Lane Striping 132,300 Subtotal Western Riverside Projects (65%) $ 2,164,515 Grand Total** $ 3,343,187 *Recommended additional projects for FY 2017/18 SB 821 funds. **There may be a difference due to rounding. Per the Commission’s SB 821 adopted policies, jurisdictions receiving an allocation have 24 months to complete approved projects and submit claim forms for reimbursement upon project completion. MOUs will be required to outline the project schedules, funding plan, and local agency match commitment. Staff will monitor the progress of the projects to ensure timely implementation of delivery and expenditures as the intent of the SB 821 program is to deliver and expend FY 2017/18 and FY 2018/19 funds within the timeframe of this cycle. FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES: It is anticipated that the CTC will have an ATP Cycle 4 Call for Projects sometime in March of next year. Staff encourages the agencies to start considering projects they would like to apply for ATP funds and begin the process of crafting the applications as soon as possible. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes N/A Year: FY 2017/18 FY 2018/19 Amount: $1,671,594 $1,671,594 Source of Funds: Local Transportation Fund SB 821 allocations Budget Adjustment: No N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 601 62 86106 Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: Attachments: 1) Revised FY 2017/18 SB 821 Funding Recommendations ATTACHMENT 1 Total SB 821 Funds Recommended Cumulative Average Rank Agency Project Description Project Cost Requested Allocation Funds Allocated Score 1 Palm Desert Class II Bike and Golf Cart Lane Improvements - Citywide 170,000$ 85,000$ 85,000$ 85,000$ 43.67 2 Desert Hot Springs Desert View Sidewalk Project 493,000$ 293,000$ 293,000$ 378,000$ 42.00 3 Eastvale 65th Bicycle Safety Enhancement 247,400$ 123,700$ 123,700$ 501,700$ 42.00 4 La Quinta La Quinta High School ADA Improvements 219,000$ 109,500$ 109,500$ 611,200$ 41.33 5 Riverside County Mayberry Ave Sidewalk Improvements (Stanford St. - Meridian St.)488,000$ 244,000$ 244,000$ 855,200$ 41.33 6 Moreno Valley Gentian Ave. and Eucalyptus Ave. Class II Bike Lanes 70,000$ 49,000$ 49,000$ 904,200$ 40.67 -Riverside County Clark Street Sidewalk Project*1,111,000$ 555,500$ -$ 904,200$ 40.67 7 Wildomar Grand Avenue Bike Lane-Phase I 1,800,000$ 270,000$ 270,000$ 1,174,200$ 40.00 8 Wildomar Grand Avenue Bike Lane-Phase II 1,426,000$ 214,000$ 214,000$ 1,388,200$ 39.00 9 Rancho Mirage ADA Pedestrian Access Ramp Upgrades on Highway 111 469,850$ 234,925$ 234,925$ 1,623,125$ 38.33 10 Lake Elsinore Bicycle Lanes to Downtown 100,200$ 50,100$ 50,100$ 1,673,225$ 37.67 11 Lake Elsinore Machado Street Missing Link Bike Lanes 151,800$ 75,900$ 75,900$ 1,749,125$ 37.67 12 Riverside County Serfas Club Drive Sidewalk Improvements 615,000$ 307,500$ 307,500$ 2,056,625$ 37.67 13 Palm Springs Racquet Club Road & Farrell Drive Missing Links Sidewalks 555,000$ 277,500$ 277,500$ 2,334,125$ 37.00 14 Hemet Sidewalk and ADA Ramps (Alessandro Street)150,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 2,409,125$ 36.33 15 Lake Elsinore Chaney Street Missing Link Sidewalk 275,660$ 137,830$ 137,830$ 2,546,955$ 36.33 16 Lake Elsinore Sumner, Mohr and Davis St. Missing Link Sidewalk 195,905$ 97,953$ 97,953$ 2,644,908$ 36.33 17 Lake Elsinore W. Lakeshore Drive Missing Link Sidewalk 263,868$ 131,934$ 131,934$ 2,776,842$ 36.33 -Riverside Carmine Street Sidewalk Improvements (College Ave. - Sierra Vista Ave.)*337,000$ 168,500$ -$ 2,776,842$ 36.33 18 Indio Avenue 42 Sidewalk Gap Closure 177,495$ 88,748$ 88,748$ 2,865,589$ 36.00 19 Lake Elsinore Mission Trail Missing Link Bike Lanes 19,550$ 9,775$ 9,775$ 2,875,364$ 35.67 20 Lake Elsinore Palomar Multi-Use Trail 491,046$ 245,523$ 245,523$ 3,120,887$ 34.67 21 La Quinta Jefferson Street Sidewalk Gap Closure 180,000$ 90,000$ 90,000$ 3,210,887$ 34.67 22 Temecula Citywide Buffered Bike-Lane Striping 189,000$ 132,300$ 132,300$ 3,343,187$ 34.00 25 Moreno Valley Heacock St Sidewalk and Bicycle Lane Improvements 650,000$ 582,000$ 33.67 26 Riverside County Mayberry Ave Sidewalk Improvements (Peartree-Casino)495,000$ 371,250$ 33.67 27 Moreno Valley Juan Bautista De Anza Trail Segment (Cottonwood-Bay)650,000$ 585,000$ 32.67 28 San Jacinto Cottonwood Ave Pedestrian Improvements 200,000$ 80,000$ 32.67 29 Banning Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements 188,278$ 75,311$ 32.00 30 Riverside County Mecca Curb Ramp Accessibility 363,800$ 272,850$ 31.67 31 Perris Mountain Ave Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements 150,000$ 75,000$ 29.67 32 Palm Springs Cerritos Road Missing Links Sidewalks 190,800$ 133,560$ 29.33 33 San Jacinto Lyon Avenue Sidewalk Installment 100,000$ 50,000$ 28.67 34 Coachella Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements 257,641$ 128,821$ 25.67 Totals 13,441,293$ 6,420,979$ 3,343,187$ ** *Projects recommended for ATP Cycle 3 Augmentation award totaling $724K (pending October CTC approval). **Remaining $256K will be utilized for future SB 821 Call for Projects. Note: There may be a difference due to rounding. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SB 821 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROGRAM FY 2017/18 PROJECT RANKING/FUNDING REVISED RECOMMENDATIONS Recommended Projects for Funding Unfunded Projects Additional Recommended Projects for Funding AGENDA ITEM 10 Agenda Item 8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: September 13, 2017 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Budget and Implementation Committee Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director THROUGH: Anne Mayer, Executive Director SUBJECT: 2018 State Transportation Improvement Program Final Fund Estimate and Project Recommendations BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This item is for the Commission to: 1) Approve staff project recommendations for the Western Riverside County State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) share as part of the 2018 STIP submittal due to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) by December 15, 2017; 2) Include the Coachella Valley Association of Government’s (CVAG) STIP project programming recommendation for the Coachella Valley STIP share and forward to the CTC as part of the 2018 STIP submittal; 3) Forward the recommended 2018 STIP projects to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) to conduct performance analysis as required by the STIP guidelines; 4) Approve Agreement No. 07-71-028-03, Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. 07-71-028-00, with the city of Blythe (Blythe) to trade $608,024 of Palo Verde Valley STIP funds with Measure A Western Riverside County Highway funds to facilitate delivery of local arterial projects; and 5) Authorize the Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission upon CTC adoption of the 2018 STIP in March 2018. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the July 2017 Commission meeting, an agenda item was presented outlining the process for the development of the 2018 STIP. At the time, the draft STIP Fund Estimate (FE) was presented to the CTC in June, which indicated Riverside County’s Target Share for programming was $104,585,000. The STIP Final FE adopted at the CTC’s August 16, 2017 meet ing, reflected a revised Target Share for Riverside County at $105,158,000. The 2018 STIP covers a five-year period from Fiscal Years 2018/19 – 2022/23; with the infusion of SB 1 STIP funds, programming capacity will be available in all five years rather than the latter years. In addition, for the first time in many years, regions are allowed to program Advance Agenda Item 8 Project Development Element (APDE) funds. APDE is strictly for environmental and design work, which the CTC calculates separately from the county target shares. The amount of APDE funding available for Riverside County is $14,599,000. Past STIP programming cycles have generated less than desirable funding levels for programming. The significance of SB 1 STIP funds can be demonstrated when compared to past programming levels as follows: STIP Cycle Riverside Target Share (in Millions) 2008 $ 0 2010 $ 0 2012 $ 90 2014 $ 67 2016 $ (32) 2018 $105 Future STIP cycles are likely to be more promising than in the past since SB 1 provides additional STIP funding over the next 10 years and includes future inflation adjustments. Per the STIP Intracounty Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), the Commission is responsible for selecting Western County projects and the CVAG selects the projects in the Coachella Valley region. The STIP funds are distributed to the three subregions as follows: 2018 STIP Fund Estimate for Riverside County Target Share Total Riverside County Share $105,158,000 Less: 2% Planning, Programming and Monitoring (PPM) 2,103,160 Total New Project Programming 103,054,840 Western County 77.30% 79,661,391 Coachella Valley 22.11% 22,785,425 Palo Verde Valley 00.59% 608,024 Per the STIP MOU with Blythe, Palo Verde Valley STIP funds have been traded with Measure A Western Riverside County highway funds to facilitate delivery of local arterial projects in the Palo Verde Valley. Given Blythe’s small staff, lower STIP funding levels, and focus on local arterials, it is more efficient to provide local funding to ensure project delivery and a less cumbersome allocation process. Upon CTC adoption of the 20 18 STIP, staff recommends an amendment of the STIP MOU with Blythe for $608,024 of 2009 Measure A funds. Blythe will also be required to amend its Measure A Capital Improvement Program to include the funds and associated projects. As a result, project recommendations for Western Riverside County total $80,269,415. Agenda Item 8 Western Riverside County Staff recommendations for Western Riverside County STIP funds are as follows: 1) Existing STIP project, Interstate 15 French Valley Parkway Interchange – Increase construction funds for the I-15 French Valley Parkway Interchange per the amount of funds that were reduced in the 2016 STIP due to reduced revenue projections at the state level; 2) New STIP project, I-15 Railroad Canyon Interchange – Add construction funds that were originally recommended as part of the 2016 STIP but disallowed as no new projects were allowed due to reduced revenue projections at the state level; 3) New STIP project, I-15 Express Lanes Southern Extension from Cajalco Road to State Route 74 – Add Project Approval & Environmental Document (PA&ED) funds for the I-15 Express lanes from Cajalco Road to SR-74. Recommended 2018 STIP Western Riverside County Project Programming Western County Project 2016 STIP 2018 STIP New Programming *2018 STIP APDE Total STIP Programming I-15 French Valley IC (Cons) $ 15,346,000 $ 32,254,000 - $ 47,600,000 I-15 Railroad Canyon IC (Cons) N/A 2,920,000 - 2,920,000 I-15 Express Lanes Extension (PA&ED) N/A 45,095,415 $ 4,904,585 50,000,000 Total $ 15,346,000 $ 80,269,415 $ 4,904,585 $ 100,520,000 *Total APDE for Riverside County is $14,599,000. Commission staff will review additional projects for APDE programming balance available of $9,694,415. Coachella Valley CVAG is responsible for STIP programming actions for the Coachella Valley region per the STIP Intracounty MOU. CVAG has indicated it plans to present STIP project recommendations for approval to its board during their September 25, 2017 Executive Committee meeting. CVAG staff is recommending programming its STIP share ($22,785,425) on two projects; CV Link and Avenue 66 Grade Separation. CVAG staff and the County of Riverside will provide the project information by end of September so that it can be included in SCAG’s performance measures analysis. PPM PPM in the amount of $2,103,160 will be programmed over three fiscal years (FY’s 2019/20 – 2021/22) at approximately $700,000 per year. Commission staff will coordinate with CVAG on the use of PPM for planning, programming and monitoring activities. Agenda Item 8 2018 STIP Submittal The 2018 STIP submittal is due to the CTC on December 15, 2017. The submittal requires various forms and reports that will involve input from Caltrans, project sponsors and consultants, and SCAG. The CTC is scheduled to adopt the 2018 STIP in March 2018. To accommodate the above schedule, staff will present its recommendations for 2018 STIP programming at the September 13, 2017 Commission meeting. The proposed STIP projects will need to be submitted to SCAG by the end of September in order for SCAG to conduct performance measures analyses in accordance with STIP guideline requirements. There is no fiscal impact to the Commission related to the STIP funding for the I-15 French Valley Parkway interchange or the I-15 Railroad Canyon Road interchange projects, as the STIP funds will not pass through the Commission. STIP funding for the I-15 Express Lanes extension and PPM will be included in future budgets upon the CTC’s 2018 STIP adoption. Financial Information In Fiscal Year Budget: N/A Year: FY 2019/20+ Amount: $52,103,160 Source of Funds: 2018 STIP Budget Adjustment: N/A GL/Project Accounting No.: 106-65-652040 $2,103,160 (PPM) 0030XX 81101 262 31 81101 $50,000,000 (I-15 Extension) Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 08/15/2017 AGENDA ITEM ZY RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: September 18, 2017 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Martha Masters, Management Analyst Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director SUBJECT: Obligation Authority Report – FFY 2016/17 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: As the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA), RCTC is responsible for ensuring that federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) and Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) funds apportioned for Riverside County are allocated and obligated in a timely manner to prevent funds from lapsing. Federal Obligation Authority (OA) for the region is provided on an annual basis and has to be spent in the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) it is provided. The Commission’s goal is to ensure that 100 percent of its OA is obligated. As we near the end of the FFY 2016/17, the Commission has obligated $104.7 million as of July 31, 2017 or 107% of its obligation authority (OA was $97,593,335). Through our own tracking of on -going obligations for August and September, the Commission has obligated approximately $11 5.4 million, or 118% of the OA, opening up the opportunity for August Redistribution. Commission staff has worked closely with our local agencies and Caltrans to ensure projects on the Obligation Delivery Plan were obligated and delivered, and most of them were. Many of these projects were from the 2013 Multi-Funding Call for Projects, 2013 Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) Call for Projects, CVAG’s 2014 CMAQ Call for Projects, and various other projects that had been awarded CMAQ or STBG funds by the Commission. The main contributor to the highest obligation year in the Commission history is the I-15 ELP that had a combined programming amount of approximately $109 million. The highest obligation previously achieved by Riverside County was $88,975,678 in FFY 2010/11. As we transition to the new FFY 2017/18, it is recommended you start your federal-aid process early on in the year to ensure timely obligation of federal funds, and to ensure sufficient OA is available. The final numbers for the August redistribution for FFY 2016/17 are not known yet but according to state officials this year’s redistribution for California will surpass the prior year that was record breaking at $293 million. Attachment: FFY 2016/17 Obligation Report Agency Project Title/Description Federal Funds 000's 2013 RSTP/ STBG Call for Projects 2013 Multi- Funding Call for Projects2 CVAG's 2014 CMAQ Call for Projects Riv Co/Jurupa Valley Van Buren Blvd. Pavement Rehab $ 387 X Hemet Gilbert St. Pavement Rehab 443 X Temecula Winchester Rd. Pavement Rehab 646 X Corona Ontario Ave. Pavement Rehab 832 X Beaumont 8th St. Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehab 220 X San Jacinto San Jacinto Ave. Pavement Rehab 290 X Indio Hwy 111 Improvements 4,680 X Coachella Ave. 48 Widening/Bike & Ped. 2,278 X Riverside County Cajalco Road Widening 6,000 X Wildomar Grand Ave. Class II & III Bicycle Lanes 614 X Wildomar Grand Ave. Class II Bicycle Lanes 747 X RCTC I-15 Toll Express Lanes - DB 94,733 Caltrans I-15 Toll Express Lanes - Oversight 2,767 Palm Springs Class II & III Bicycle Lanes (Various) 402 X Coachella Class II Bicycle Lanes (Various) 406 X 115,445$ FFY 2016/17 Obligation Report As of 9/13/2017 AGENDA ITEM 12 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION DATE: September 18, 2017 TO: Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Martha Masters, Management Analyst Grace Alvarez, Planning and Programming Manager Shirley Medina, Planning and Programming Director SUBJECT: Obligation Delivery Plan – FFY 2017/18 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: As the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA), RCTC is responsible for ensuring that federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) and Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) funds apportioned to Riverside County are allocated and obligated in a timely manner to prevent funds from lapsing. Federal Obligation Authority (OA) for the region is provided on an annual basis and has to be used in the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) it is provided. The Commission’s goal is to ensure that 100 percent of its OA is obligated. RCTC works closely with our local agencies and Caltrans to ensure projects on the Obligation Delivery Plan are obligated and delivered. Many of these projects are from the 2013 Multi-Funding Call for Projects, 2013 Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) Call for Projects, CVAG’s 2014 CMAQ Call for Projects, and various other projects that had been awarded STBG or CMAQ funds by the Commission. The attached obligation plan is an outline of the projects that have STBG or CMAQ programmed in FFY 2017/18. If your agency has a project that can be delivered (obligated) in FFY 2017/18 but is not included in this draft obligation plan FFY 17/18, please contact staff to ensure the project is added to this year’s obligation plan. And, as we transition to the new FFY 2017/18, it is recommended to start the federal-aid process early on in the federal fiscal year to ensure timely obligation of federal funds. Attachment: FFY 2017/18 Obligation Plan DRAFT FFY 2017/2018 OBLIGATION PLAN As of 9/13/2017 PA&ED PA&ED Date Milestone Date R/W R/W Date Milestone Date STATE HWY Albert Vergel de Dios/ Awais Sheik Beaumont DEM10 5209(008)SR60/Potrero Blvd. Interchange Ph. I 8,929,000 Con Cleared 5/15/2017 6/30/2017 7/3/2017 7/3/2017 PS&E FY 19/20 Chigo Dike Calimesa CML 5460(008)I-10/Cherry Valley IC 443,000 PA&ED Planning FY 16/17 Albert Vergel de Dios Palm Desert TBD I-10 at Portola Ave 1,275,000 Con PA&ED Albert Vergel de Dios Palm Springs CML 5282(045)Gene Autry Trail and Vista Chino - Cons 2nd LT Ln..246,200 Con PA&ED FY 2017/18 Chigo Dike Riverside Adams St at 91 IC 935,000 Eng PSR FY 17/18 Evita Premdas RCTC HP21STPL- 6054(082) Pachappa Underpass (SR91 HOV Remnant Work)9,756,000 Con 10/1/2017 R/W FY 19/20 Evita Premdas County of Riverside for Menifee STPLN 5956(262)I-215/Scott Rd IC 8,000,000 Con PS&E FY 17/18 Subtotal 689,200 28,895,000 Caltrans Staff Agency FPN Project Location CMAQ RSTP/STBG Funding Phase Project Approvals RFA Subm. To CT D8 (Projected) RFA Milestone Current Project Status FTIP Funding Year Page 1 of 3 DRAFT FFY 2017/2018 OBLIGATION PLAN As of 9/13/2017 PA&ED PA&ED Date Milestone Date R/W R/W Date Milestone Date Caltrans Staff Agency FPN Project Location CMAQ RSTP/STBG Funding Phase Project Approvals RFA Subm. To CT D8 (Projected) RFA Milestone Current Project Status FTIP Funding Year LOCAL HWY Chigo Dike Banning STPL 5214(011)Ramsey St. Pavement Rehab 182,000 Con PA&ED FY 16/17 Chigo Dike Calimesa STPL 5460(009)Calimesa and Avenue L Pavement Rehab 54,000 Con Planning FY 19/20 Albert Vergel de Dios Indian Wells STPL 5401(003)Cook Street Rubberized Overlay Pavement Rehab 135,000 Con Cleared 12/7/2015 5/30/2016 Cleared 6/30/2016 1/2/2018 Con FY 17/18 Albert Vergel de Dios Indio CML-5275(030)Paving of Four (4) residential roads in Indio 1,132,000 Con Cleared 7/12/2016 5/30/2017 6/30/2017 6/30/2018 6/30/2018 Design FY 17/18 Chigo Dike Moreno Valley CML 5441(065)Various Locations Signal Synchronization (TCM)1,542,000 Con PA&ED FY 15/16 Chigo Dike Moreno Valley CML 5441(063)Cactus, Alessandro and Day (Dynamic Message Signs)341,000 Con PA&ED FY 16/17 Page 2 of 3 DRAFT FFY 2017/2018 OBLIGATION PLAN As of 9/13/2017 PA&ED PA&ED Date Milestone Date R/W R/W Date Milestone Date Caltrans Staff Agency FPN Project Location CMAQ RSTP/STBG Funding Phase Project Approvals RFA Subm. To CT D8 (Projected) RFA Milestone Current Project Status FTIP Funding Year Albert Vergel de Dios Rancho Mirage CML 5412(016) Ramon Rd and Dinah Shore Dr Traffic Flow Imp & Sand Fencing 31,000 R/W PA&ED FY 17/18 Chigo Dike Riverside STPL 5058(102) Magnolia Ave from Buchanan to Banbury (Widening 4 -6 lns) 2,620,000 Con PA&ED FY 17/18 Eric Cowle CVAG CVAG Regional Synch 5,315,000 Patti Romo Riv. Co.Salt Creek Multi-Modal Trail 5,090,000 Subtotal 13,451,000 2,991,000 Total 14,140,200 31,886,000 Page 3 of 3 AGENDA ITEM 13 A presentation will be made but there is no attachment to the agenda for item 13.