HomeMy Public PortalAbout03 March 19, 2018 Technical AdvisoryComments are welcomed by the Commission. If you wish to provide comments to the Commission,
please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board.
MEETING AGENDA
Technical Advisory Committee
Time 10:30 a.m. (PLEASE NOTE TIME CHANGE)
Date March 19, 2018
Location Coachella Valley Association of Governments
Board Room
73710 Fred Waring Drive
Palm Desert, CA 92260
COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Lori Askew, City of Calimesa
Armando Baldizzone, City of Blythe
Chad Blais, City of Norco
Bo Chen, City of Palm Desert
K. George Colangeli, PVVTA
John Corella, City of Cathedral City
Jesse Eckenroth, City of Rancho Mirage
Brad Fagrell, City of Lake Elsinore
Tom Garcia, City of Palm Springs
Christopher Gray, WRCOG
Jonathan Hoy, City of Coachella
Joe Indrawan, City of Eastvale
Amer Jakher, City of Beaumont
Rohan Kuruppu, Riverside Transit Agency
David Lee, Caltrans District 8
Steve Loriso, City of Jurupa Valley
Martin Magana, CVAG
Brian McKinney, City of La Quinta
Bob Moehling, City of Murrieta
Farshid Mohammadi, City of Riverside Vice Chair
Habib Motlagh, Cities of Perris and San Jacinto
Nelson Nelson, City of Corona
Aaron Palmer, City of Canyon Lake
Daniel Porras, City of Desert Hot Springs
Patricia Romo, County of Riverside
Ken Seumalo, City of Indian Wells – Chair
Sudi Shoja, City of Hemet
Jonathan Smith, City of Menifee
Patrick Thomas, City of Temecula
Art Vela, City of Banning
Timothy T. Wassil, City of Indio
Michael Wolfe, City of Moreno Valley
Dan York, City of Wildomar
Vacant, SunLine Transit Agency
COMM-TAC-00060
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA*
*Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda.
TIME: 10:30 A.M.
DATE: March 19, 2018
LOCATION: Coachella Valley Association of Governments
Board Room
73710 Fred Waring Drive
Palm Desert, CA 92260
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Government Code Section 54954.2, and
the Federal Transit Administration Title VI, please contact the Clerk of the Board at
(951) 787‐7141 if special assistance is needed to participate in a public meeting, including
accessibility and translation services. Assistance is provided free of charge. Notification of at
least 48 hours prior to the meeting time will assist staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can
be made to provide assistance at the meeting.
1. Call to Order
2. Self-Introductions
3. Approval of November 20, 2017 Minutes
4. Public Comments (This is for comments on items not listed on agenda. Comments relating
to an item on the agenda will be taken when the item is before the Committee.)
5. Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Update (Attachment)
6. Active Transportation Program (ATP) 10-Point Policy (Attachment)
7. Truck Study Update (Attachment)
8. Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Update (Verbal Presentation)
9. Federal Obligation Plan Update (Attachment)
10. Caltrans Update (Verbal Presentation)
11. March Commission Meeting Highlights (Verbal Presentation)
12. Other Announcements
13. Other Business
14. Adjournment
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting
March 19, 2018
Page 2
The next meeting will be May 21, 2018 in Riverside at 10:00 a.m.
MINUTES
AGENDA ITEM 5
RCTC
Long Range
Transportation
Plan
Presented By:
Prepared For:
RCTC Project Understanding
•The LRTP will:
–Dovetail with and bridge local plans and SCAG’s
Regional Transportation Plan
–Support the County’s economy and quality of life
through:
•Smart planning
•Project development
•Implementation
" T h e L R T P m u s t b e b a s e d o n a n d i s c o n s t r a i n e d b y :
V o t e r a p p r o v e d M e a s u r e A r e q u i r e m e n t s
T h e 2 0 1 6 S t r a t e g i c A s s e s s m e n t
E v o l v i n g s t a t e & f e d e r a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n s & p o l i c i e s ,
e s p e c i a l l y p e r f o r m a n c e - b a s e d p l a n n i n g r e q u i s i t e s
C o u n t y r e s i d e n t s o p i n i o n s ( p u b l i c & s t a k e h o l d e r s )
I m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f n e w & i n n o v a t i v e p r o j e c t s s u c h a s
T o l l e d E x p r e s s L a n e s & r a i l e x t e n s i o n s
T h e C o u n t y s d y n a m i c e c o n o m i c s y s t e m & d e m o g r a p h i c
t r e n d s
R e v e n u e r e a l i t i e s
R C T C P r o j e c t U n d e r s t a n d i n g
Project Approach
•Task 2 -Develop Vision/Guiding Goals Draft Under Review
•Task 3 -Analyze Existing & Future Transportation
Conditions
-and -
•Task 4 –Transportation
Issues & Strategies for
Investments including……….
Project Approach
–Demographics Draft Under Development
–Regional Highway/Local Street Network Connectivity,
Maintenance, & Operations Draft Under Development
–Transit System and Service Providers’ Connectivity,
Maintenance, and Operations Draft Under Development
–Paratransit Services Draft Under Development
–Bicycle & Pedestrian Systems Draft Under Development
–Goods Movement Draft Under Development
–Funding Sources Draft Under Development
Project Approach
–Transit Oriented Development/High Quality Transit
Areas
–Transportation Systems Management/Transportation
Demand Management
–Sustainability Issues
–Economic Development
Project Approach
•Task 5 –Proposed Projects and Programs
including:
–Identification of Projects and Programs In Process
–Packaging of Transportation Investments
•Task 6 -Evaluation Tools including:
–Define Model Process, Horizon years, and Land Use
Network Assumptions In Process
–Cost Estimation
–Performance Measures & Methodology Draft Under Review
Project Approach
•Task 7 –Draft LRTP
•Task 8 –Final LRTP
•Task 9 –Draft Measure A 2019 Transportation
Expenditure Plan
•Task 10 OPTIONAL –Transportation Projects &
Programs Beyond Current & Future Funding Levels
•Task 11 –Outreach
–Outreach Plan Draft Under Review
–Advisory Committee In Process
–Other Outreach
Remaining Project Schedule
•Task 3: Existing and Future Conditions Report
–Draft Submitted March 1, 2018
•Task 4: Transportation Issues & Strategies Report
–May 1, 2018
•Task 5: Proposed Projects and Programs
–July 2018
•Task 6: Project Evaluation
–September 2018
•Tasks 7 & 8: Prepare Draft and Final LRTP
–Draft December 2018; Final April 2019
•Task 9: Measure A 2019 Plan Review/Update
–Draft February 2019; Final March 2019
Questions
AGENDA ITEM 6
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: March 19, 2018
TO: Technical Advisory Committee
FROM: Lorelle Moe-Luna, Planning and Programming Manager
SUBJECT:
Active Transportation Program - Metropolitan Planning Organization’s Regional
Program Guidelines and Methodology for Assigning Additional Points for
Riverside County Project Applications
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to:
1) Discuss and provide input on the Active Transportation Program (ATP) - Metropolitan Planning
Organization’s (MPO) Regional Program Guidelines and methodology for assigning 10 points for
Riverside County project applications.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
ATP is a highly competitive statewide program that funds bicycle and pedestrian facilities and programs to
enhance or encourage walking and biking. The California Transportation Commission (CTC) awards 50
percent of the funds at the statewide competitive level, 10 percent to small urban and rural regions, and
40 percent at the large Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) level. The ATP process allows applicants
two opportunities for award – statewide and large MPO level. As part of the sequential project selection,
projects are first evaluated statewide and those that are not ranked high enough for statewide funding are
automatically provided a second opportunity for funding through the large MPO share. As the MPO, the
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is required to work with county transportation
commissions, the CTC, and Caltrans to develop its regional program recommendations.
As part of the development of the regional program guidelines, SCAG allows each county transportation
commission to assign up to 10 points to the CTC’s project scores for projects that are consistent with local
and regional plans. Each county transportation commission in the SCAG region is responsible for defining
“plans” and developing its guidance and methodology for assigning the additional 10 points. In addition, if
a county transportation commission assigns points to a project for which it is the lead applicant, an
explanation must be provided on how the scoring process resulted in an unbiased evaluation of projects.
In April 2014, the Commission approved staff’s recommendation to assign 10 points to each application if
the project is consistent with an adopted local and regional “plan.” A “plan” may include, but is not limited
to, the following:
Measure A Expenditure Plan
Riverside County Public Transportation – Annual Countywide Performance Report
SCAG Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy
Western Riverside Council of Government’s Non-Motorized Transportation Plan
Coachella Valley Association of Government’s Non-Motorized Transportation Plan
City/County/School District Bicycle Plans
City/County/School District Pedestrian Facilities
�� T r a i l S y s t e m R e g i o n a l o f M u l t i - C o u n t y T r a i l S y s t e m ( e . g . S a n t a A n a R i v e r T r a i l , C V - L i n k )
�� O t h e r
T h e c u r r e n t p o l i c y w a s d e v e l o p e d b a s e d o n t h e c o n s i d e r a t i o n t h a t t h e C T C h a d y e t t o a d m i n i s t e r i t s f i r s t
c a l l f o r p r o j e c t s a t t h e t i m e u n d e r t h e n e w A T P , t h u s , a l l o w i n g s t a f f m a x i m u m f l e x i b i l i t y a n d d i s c r e t i o n t o
R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y p r o j e c t s s e l e c t e d u n d e r t h e M P O r e g i o n a l p r o g r a m .
N o w t h a t t h r e e c y c l e s o f A T P h a v e p a s s e d , s t a f f r e c o m m e n d s t h a t t h e 1 0 - p o i n t p o l i c y b e r e v i e w e d f o r
p o t e n t i a l r e v i s i o n s w i t h p a r t i c i p a t i o n a n d f e e d b a c k f r o m t h e T A C c o m m i t t e e . A s u b c o m m i t t e e c a n b e
f o r m e d , i f t h e T A C c h o o s e s ; h o w e v e r , i t w o u l d b e r e c o m m e n d e d t h a t t h e r e i s d i v e r s i t y a n d e q u i t y b y
g e o g r a p h i c a n d s u b r e g i o n a l r e p r e s e n t a t i o n , i n c l u d i n g j u r i s d i c t i o n s t h a t h a v e a n d h a v e n o t a p p l i e d f o r A T P
f u n d s .
A s a p o i n t o f c o m p a r i s o n , s t a f f h a s c o m p i l e d h o w o t h e r c o u n t y t r a n s p o r t a t i o n c o m m i s s i o n s a r e a s s i g n i n g
t h e i r 1 0 - p o i n t s , a s s h o w n i n t h e t a b l e b e l o w . O t h e r c o n s i d e r a t i o n s o f t h e p o l i c y t h a t c a n a l s o b e a d o p t e d
i s h o w a t i e b e t w e e n m u l t i p l e p r o j e c t s w i l l b e h a n d l e d .
A T P M P O 1 0 - P o i n t P o l i c y b y C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n C o m m i s s i o n
C o u n t y P o i n t s C r i t e r i a
R i v e r s i d e 1 0 C o n s i s t e n t w i t h l o c a l a n d r e g i o n a l p l a n
S a n B e r n a r d i n o 1 0 C o n s i s t e n t w i t h l o c a l a n d r e g i o n a l p l a n
I m p e r i a l 1 0 C o n s i s t e n t w i t h l o c a l a n d r e g i o n a l p l a n
O r a n g e
M a x i m u m o f 1 0 p o i n t s
5 A p l a n n e d b i k e w a y i n t h e O r a n g e C o u n t y C o m m u t e r B i k e w a y s S t r a t e g i c
P l a n
5 P r o j e c t i s i n c l u d e d i n t h e O r a n g e C o u n t y N o n - m o t o r i z e d M e t r o l i n k
A c c e s s i b i l i t y S t r a t e g y
5 P r o j e c t i s a s i d e w a l k o n a f a c i l i t y w i t h i n t h e M a s t e r P l a n o f A r t e r i a l
H i g h w a y s
3 P r o j e c t i s i n c l u d e d i n a l o c a l a g e n c y b i c y c l e o r p e d e s t r i a n m a s t e r p l a n o r
a c t i v e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n
2 P r o j e c t i s i n c l u d e d i n a l o c a l S R T S P l a n
2 P r o j e c t i s i n c l u d e d i n a s p e c i f i c p l a n o r c o r r i d o r p l a n
1 P r o j e c t i s i n c l u d e d i n l o c a l a g e n c y g e n e r a l p l a n o r c i r c u l a t i o n p l a n
L o s A n g e l e s
7 C o n s i s t e n t w i t h l o c a l a n d r e g i o n a l p l a n
3
S u c c e s s f u l i n t h e M e t r o C a l l f o r P r o j e c t s , a l l p r o j e c t s w i t h M e t r o B o a r d
c o m m i t m e n t , a n d a l l p r o j e c t s w h i c h i m p l e m e n t M e t r o a c t i v e
t r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n s a n d p o l i c i e s
V e n t u r a 5 C o n s i s t e n t w i t h l o c a l a n d r e g i o n a l p l a n
5 S a f e R o u t e s t o S c h o o l P r o j e c t
N e x t S t e p s
S t a f f w i l l c o n t i n u e t o s e e k f e e d b a c k a n d c o m m e n t s f r o m T A C m e m b e r s a n d w i l l r e t u r n t o t h e T A C i n M a y
2 0 1 8 w i t h a n u p d a t e a n d r e c o m m e n d e d r e v i s i o n s , i f n e c e s s a r y . I f r e v i s i o n s t o t h e p o l i c y a r e r e c o m m e n d e d ,
t h e n s t a f f w i l l s e e k a p p r o v a l f r o m t h e C o m m i s s i o n a t t h e J u n e 2 0 1 8 m e e t i n g f o r s u b m i t t a l t o S C A G b y J u l y
2 0 1 8 f o r i n c l u s i o n i n t o t h e M P O R e g i o n a l P r o g r a m G u i d e l i n e s .
AGENDA ITEM 7
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: March 19, 2018
TO: Technical Advisory Committee
FROM: Lorelle Moe-Luna, Planning and Programming Manager
SUBJECT: Update on the Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of
a Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This item is for the Committee to receive and file an update and presentation on the regional
truck study and development and implementation of a regional logistics mitigation fee.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
In January 2017, the Commission approved the award for a regional truck study and development
and implementation of a regional logistics mitigation fee to WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc (now
known as WSP).
The study is the result of the settlement agreement between the Commission, the county of
Riverside (County), city of Moreno Valley (Moreno Valley), and Highland Fairview in response to
litigation involving the World Logistics Center (WLC). The Commission and the County had filed
suit challenging the environmental impact report in order to ensure adequate mitigation to
address added impacts created by the WLC project. Additional lawsuits were filed by the South
Coast Air Quality Management District and a number of environmental organizations.
The eventual settlement agreement was finalized to provide needed funding for infrastructure
efforts that would help mitigate the impacts of this kind of development throughout the County
and to do so in a way that would encourage ongoing economic development and job creation for
County residents.
A key provision of the settlement requires the Commission, the County, Moreno Valley,
and Highland Fairview to conduct a regional transportation study to evaluate a logistics-related
regional fee. A result of the study could be a new a program that the County and cities in the
County could adopt. Such a program would, for example, set a fee on new distribution center
warehouses, based on facility size, to help pay for highway improvements. This fee would differ
from existing Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Programs in that it would only focus
on highway projects, as compared to the regional TUMF Programs , which collect funds for
regional arterials and local streets.
If the County or at least 75 percent of the Commission’s member cities adopt a regional
warehouse fee within two years after a final court judgment is issued, Highland Fairview will pay
65 cents per square foot for each operating warehouse within the WLC. If no regional fee is
adopted, the fee would be 50 cents per square foot. Proceeds would be used for projects
identified as part of the regional truck study.
Project Status
Upon approval of the award in January 2017, the study was kicked off in spring 2017 and is
projected to be completed by summer 2018.
The scope of work includes five tasks with deliverables as summarized in the table below.
Task/Scope Deliverables
Task 1: Existing and Future Conditions Analysis
Inventory existing and forecasted (2040) logistics facilities in the
County, analyze the various types of logistics facilities, the
functions that they serve, and the types of businesses that utilize
them.
Quantify truck traffic and impacts on the highway system related
to existing and forecasted (2040) logistics facilities in the County;
describe the nature of the truck trips such as origin/destination,
type of cargo, time-of-day, and equipment.
Technical
Memorandum on
Existing and Future
Conditions (October
2017)
Task 2: Funding and Cost Analysis
Identify and quantify currently available funding sources and
mechanisms to offset impacts of logistics facilities in the County.
Identify and quantify costs of addressing existing deficiencies in
highway infrastructure in the County.
Technical
Memorandum on
Funding Gap Report
(March 2018)
Task 3: Nexus Study
Establish the relationship between growth of logistics-related
facilities within the County, truck traffic growth, and the needed
improvements to mitigate such growth.
Technical
Memorandum on
Logistics Facility
Regional Nexus Study
(April 2018)
Task 4: Fee Allocation Structure and Implementing Mechanism
Design a fee program based on the research and review of
existing and similar fess throughout the County and other states
with consideration to the legal, political, and practical
implications; conduct an economic elasticity analysis that
measures the impact of a logistics-related facilities mitigation
fee, particularly focused on local employment and economic
development.
Technical
Memorandum on Fee
Allocation Structure
and Implementing
Mechanism Plan (May
2018)
�� T h e p r o p o s e d f e e p r o g r a m w i l l , a t m i n i m u m , i n c l u d e : l e g a l
r e q u i r e m e n t s ; a c t i o n s r e q u i r e d b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n d o t h e r
l o c a l j u r i s d i c t i o n s ; i m p l e m e n t a t i o n m e c h a n i s m ; f e e s c h e d u l e ;
a n t i c i p a t e d r e v e n u e s ; p a r a m e t e r s o f e x p e n d i t u r e s f r o m f e e
r e v e n u e s ; a n d t i m e f r a m e o f t h e f e e p r o g r a m .
T a s k 5 : S t u d y R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s
�� A c o m p i l a t i o n o f a l l i n f o r m a t i o n g a t h e r e d f r o m a l l t a s k s t o m a k e
f i n d i n g s a n d r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s t o t h e C o m m i s s i o n o n a c t i o n s i t
c a n t a k e t o e s t a b l i s h a n e w r e g i o n a l l o g i s t i c s - r e l a t e d f a c i l i t i e s
m i t i g a t i o n f e e i n t h e C o u n t y .
T e c h n i c a l
M e m o r a n d u m o n
S t u d y
R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s ,
F i n a l R e g i o n a l L o g i s t i c s
M i t i g a t i o n F e e S t u d y
D o c u m e n t , i n c l u d i n g
D e v e l o p m e n t a n d
I m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f
R e g i o n a l L o g i s t i c s
M i t i g a t i o n F e e s
( J u n e / J u l y 2 0 1 8 )
D a r r e n H e n d e r s o n , W S P P r o j e c t M a n a g e r , w i l l p r o v i d e a p r e s e n t a t i o n o n t h e c o m p l e t e d t e c h n i c a l
m e m o r a n d u m s , d i s c u s s t h e d a t a t h a t h a s b e e n g a t h e r e d a n d a n a l y z e d , a n d h i g h l i g h t c r i t i c a l s t e p s
f o r m o v i n g f o r w a r d .
T h e r e i s n o f i n a n c i a l i m p a c t f o r t h i s i t e m .
A T T A C H M E N T 1 : P o w e r P o i n t P r e s e n t a t i o n f o r M a r c h 1 9 , 2 0 1 8 T A C M e e t i n g
REGIONAL TRUCK STUDY
AND DEVELOPMENT
AND IMPLEMENTATION OF
REGIONAL LOGISTICS MITIGATION FEE
RCTC TECHNICAL ADVISORY
COMMITTEE MEETING
MARCH 19, 2018
Outline of Topics
•Overview of Progress to Date
–Identifying Deficiencies
–Attributing Share of Impact
–Estimating the Cost of Needed Improvements
•Cost Estimation Methodology
•Design Concepts to Mitigate Impacts
•Conceptual Cost Estimates
•Next Steps
RCTC TAC MEETING, MARCH 19, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Overall Progress
RCTC TAC MEETING, MARCH 19, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Completed Tasks
Current
Tasks
Identified Deficiencies
RCTC TAC MEETING, MARCH 19, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Identified Deficiencies
STUDY ADVISORY TEAM MEETING, JANUARY 18, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Identified Deficiencies
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
SR-79 S Rancho California Rd 1.0 4 1.01
Rancho California Rd Winchester Rd 1.1 4 1.01
2 Winchester Rd Lane Add south of I-15/I-215 Split 0.7 4 1.08 Add aux lane between the on-ramp and the lane add
3 Clinton Keith Rd Baxter Rd 0.8 3 1.03 Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps
4 El Cerrito Rd Ontario Ave 0.2 3 1.03 Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps
5 Norco Dr/6th Street Limonite Ave 2.0 3 1.14 Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps
Cantu Galeano Ranch Rd Limonite Ave 1.3 3 1.02
Limonite Ave Norco Dr/6th Street 2.0 3 1.04
7 El Cerrito Rd Dos Lagos Dr 2.1 3 1.09 Widen mainline to 4 lanes
8 Temescal Canyon Rd Indian Truck Trail 2.2 3 1.01 Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps
Rubidoux Blvd Market St 0.8 3 1.03
Market St Main St 0.1 3 1.06
Box Springs Rd Central Ave/Watkins Dr 0.4 3 1.07
Central Ave/Watkins Dr Martin Luther King Jr 0.8 3 1.23
10c University Ave Off-Ramp Upstream of Univ Ave On-ramp 0.4 3 1.04 Add aux lane upstream of the on-ramp to the off-ramp
11 Center St Off-Ramp Riverside County Line/Iowa Ave 0.5 3 1.03 Add aux lane between the off-ramp and the county line
12 Martin Luther King Jr Sycamore Canyon Rd 1.6 4 1.25 Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps
13 Van Buren Blvd Harley Knox Blvd 1.2 3 1.06 Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps
Riverside County Line Green River Rd Off-Ramp 0.8 5 1.23 Add aux lane from the county line to Green River Rd. off-ramp
Green River Rd Off-Ramp SR-71 1.3 5 1.02 Widen mainline to 6 lanes
SR-71 Serfas Club Dr Off-Ramp 1.4 4 1.27 Widen mainline to 6 lanes
15 Serfas Club Dr Off-Ramp Grand Blvd Off-Ramp 2.3 4 1.23 Widen mainline to 5 lanes
16 On-Ramp from SB I-15 On-Ramp from NB I-15 0.3 3 1.07 Add aux lane
17 McKinley St Off-Ramp Pierce St 1.6 3 1.14 Widen mainline to 4 lanes
18 Magnolia Ave La Sierra Ave 0.3 3 1.00 Add aux lane between the ramps
Serfas Club Dr Off-Ramp Lane Add at SR-71 2.3 4 1.12 Widen mainline to 5 lanes
Lane Add at SR-71 Riverside County Line 1.7 5 1.07 Widen mainline to 6 lanes
Segment
Length
Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps
Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps
Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps
Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps
Existing
LanesIDRoute
Name Dir Beginning End 2040
Max V/C Recommended Improvement
1
6
I-15
NB
SB
9 SR-60 EB
10
I-215
NB
SB
14
19 SB
SR-91
NB
Attributing the
Share of Impacts to
Warehousing and Logistics Uses
RCTC TAC MEETING, MARCH 19, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Attributing the Share of Impacts
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
SR-91
Riverside
to Corona
SR-60
Western
Moreno
Valley
I-5 North
of Corona
SR-60
Eastern
Moreno
Valley
I-215
North of
Riverside
Components of 2040 Traffic Flow
Existing Traffic Other Growth New Logistics Trucks
Growth
Worsens
Existing
Deficiencies
Growth
Creates
New
Deficiencies
Existing
Capacity
can Handle
Growth
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
SR-91
Riverside
to Corona
SR-60
Western
Moreno
Valley
I-5 North
of Corona
SR-60
Eastern
Moreno
Valley
I-215
North of
Riverside
Components of 2040 Traffic Flow
Existing Traffic Other Growth New Logistics Trucks
Existing
Traffic
Non-Warehouse
Growth
Warehouse
Growth
Capacity
Attributing the Share of Impacts
•Adjust for the following factors:
–Existing capacity deficiency
–Share of future traffic growth that is attributable to other
development activity
–Pass through trips that have a trip end outside Riverside
County
•Accomplished by comparing base model run to model
run that separates warehouse and logistics uses
RCTC TAC MEETING, MARCH 19, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Attributing the Share of Impacts
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
SR-79 S Rancho California Rd 1.0 1.01 1%
Rancho California Rd Winchester Rd 1.1 1.01 1%
2 Winchester Rd Lane Add south of I-15/I-215 Split 0.7 1.08 Add aux lane between the on-ramp and the lane add 1%
3 Clinton Keith Rd Baxter Rd 0.8 1.03 Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps 0.3%
4 El Cerrito Rd Ontario Ave 0.2 1.03 Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps 1%
5 Norco Dr/6th Street Limonite Ave 2.0 1.14 Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps 1%
Cantu Galeano Ranch Rd Limonite Ave 1.3 1.02 4%
Limonite Ave Norco Dr/6th Street 2.0 1.04 5%
7 El Cerrito Rd Dos Lagos Dr 2.1 1.09 Widen mainline to 4 lanes 2%
8 Temescal Canyon Rd Indian Truck Trail 2.2 1.01 Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps 1%
Rubidoux Blvd Market St 0.8 1.03 31%
Market St Main St 0.1 1.06 39%
Box Springs Rd Central Ave 0.4 1.07 14%
Watkins Dr Martin Luther King Jr 0.8 1.23 38%
10c University Ave Off-Ramp Upstream of Univ Ave On-ramp 0.4 1.04 Add aux lane upstream of the on-ramp to the off-ramp 13%
11 Center St Off-Ramp Riverside County Line/Iowa Ave 0.5 1.03 Add aux lane between the off-ramp and the county line 12%
12 Martin Luther King Jr Sycamore Canyon Rd 1.6 1.25 Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps 57%
13 Van Buren Blvd Harley Knox Blvd 1.2 1.06 Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps 4%
Riverside County Line Green River Rd Off-Ramp 0.8 1.23 Add aux lane from the county line to Green River Rd. off-ramp 1%
Green River Rd Off-Ramp SR-71 1.3 1.02 Widen mainline to 6 lanes 10%
SR-71 Serfas Club Dr Off-Ramp 1.4 1.27 Widen mainline to 6 lanes 1%
15 Serfas Club Dr Off-Ramp Grand Blvd Off-Ramp 2.3 1.23 Widen mainline to 5 lanes 9%
16 On-Ramp from SB I-15 On-Ramp from NB I-15 0.3 1.07 Add aux lane 8%
17 McKinley St Off-Ramp Pierce St 1.6 1.14 Widen mainline to 4 lanes 10%
18 Magnolia Ave La Sierra Ave 0.3 1.00 Add aux lane between the ramps 8%
Serfas Club Dr Off-Ramp Lane Add at SR-71 2.3 1.12 Widen mainline to 5 lanes 3%
Lane Add at SR-71 Riverside County Line 1.7 1.07 Widen mainline to 6 lanes 2%
14
SR-91
NB
19 SB
9 SR-60 EB Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps
10
I-215
NB
Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps
SB
1
I-15
NB
Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps
6
SB
Add aux lane between the on- and off-ramps
2040
Max V/C Recommended Improvement
% Deficiency
Attributable to
New Logistics
Trucking
ID Route
Name Dir Beginning End
Segment
Length
(mi)
Estimating the Cost of
Needed Improvements
RCTC TAC MEETING, MARCH 19, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Cost Estimation Methodology
•Deficient segments were reviewed to determine project
limits/logical termini for mitigation project concepts
•Mitigation project concepts were compared to
completed and ongoing RCTC program to determine
where deficiencies have been/are being mitigated
•Conceptual designs were developed using Google
desktop research.
–All costs and impacts based on visual analysis
–No detailed engineering completed for verification
RCTC TAC MEETING, MARCH 19, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Cost Estimation Methodology
•Conceptual costs were developed based on the
quantification of construction elements in the
conceptual designs
•Unit cost values based on Caltrans 2016/2017
Construction Cost Database
•Various ancillary and support cost factors, and
contingency factor applied
RCTC TAC MEETING, MARCH 19, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Design Concepts
to Mitigate Impacts
RCTC TAC MEETING, MARCH 19, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Conceptual Design I-15 SB Cajalco to Indian Truck
STUDY ADVISORY TEAM MEETING, JANUARY 18, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Conceptual Design I-15 SB Cajalco to Indian Truck
STUDY ADVISORY TEAM MEETING, JANUARY 18, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Conceptual Design I-15 SB Cajalco to Indian Truck
STUDY ADVISORY TEAM MEETING, JANUARY 18, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Conceptual Cost Estimates
RCTC TAC MEETING, MARCH 19, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Cost Estimation I-15 SB Cajalco to Indian Truck
STUDY ADVISORY TEAM MEETING, FEBRUARY 22, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Cost Estimation I-15 SB Cajalco to Indian Truck
RCTC TAC MEETING, MARCH 19, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Cost Estimation I-15 SB Cajalco to Indian Truck
STUDY ADVISORY TEAM MEETING, FEBRUARY 22, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Total Conceptual Cost Estimate
RCTC TAC MEETING, MARCH 19, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Total Conceptual Cost Estimate: $430,529,000 to 452,238,000
Next Steps
RCTC TAC MEETING, MARCH 19, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
STUDY ADVISORY TEAM MEETING, FEBRUARY 22, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
Updated Schedule
Next Steps
•Calculate a Draft Fee Schedule
•Prepare Nexus Study Report
•Consider Fee Allocation and Implementation
•Present Study Results
RCTC TAC MEETING, MARCH 19, 2018
Regional Truck Study and Development and Implementation of Regional Logistics Mitigation Fee
AGENDA ITEM 8
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 8.
AGENDA ITEM 9
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
DATE: March 19, 2018
TO: Technical Advisory Committee
FROM: Martha Masters, Senior Management Analyst
SUBJECT: Obligation Delivery Plan Update – FFY 2017/18
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
As the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA), RCTC is responsible for ensuring that federal
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) and Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) funds
apportioned to Riverside County are allocated and obligated in a timely manner to prevent funds from
lapsing. Federal Obligation Authority (OA) for the region is provided on an annual basis and has to be
used in the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) it is provided. The Commission’s goal is to ensure that 100 percent
of its OA is obligated.
RCTC works closely with our local agencies and Caltrans to ensure projects on the Obligation Delivery
Plan are obligated and delivered. Many of these projects are from the 2013 Multi -Funding Call for
Projects, 2013 Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP a.k.a STBG) Call for Projects, CVAG’s
2014 CMAQ Call for Projects, and various other projects that had been awarded CMAQ or STBG funds
by the Commission. The attached obligation plan provides an outline of the projects that have RSTP or
CMAQ programmed in FFY 2017/18. The information provided in the attached obligation plan comes
from milestone updates received from your agencies, discussions with project sponsors, and our
monthly meetings with local assistance.
As we continue into FFY 2017/18, it is recommended you begin your federal-aid process as soon as
possible, and/or devote the resources needed to secure the federal approvals for obligation, en suring
the timely obligation of the federal funds. In the attached FFY 2017/18 Obligation Plan, are the planned
CMAQ and STBG obligations projects for the current year. If you anticipate a delay in obligating these
funds this year, please notify RCTC staff with a project status update.
It is critical that local agencies awarded federal funds meet the milestones established to ensure local
OA does not lapse. RCTC will be reviewing agreement dates and contacting agencies that have made
little to no progress to discuss alternatives for the federal award. RCTC staff is available to assist cities
with the processing of the RFA submittals and the overall navigation through the federal-aid process.
Attachment: FFY 2017/18 Obligation Plan
DRAFT FFY 2017/2018 OBLIGATION PLANAs of 3/12/2018PA&EDPA&EDDateMilestone Date R/WR/WDateMilestone DateSTATE HWYAlbert Vergel de DiosPalm SpringsCML 5282(045)Gene Autry Trail and Vista Chino ‐ Cons 2nd LT Ln..246,200 ConCleared 11/3/2017 11/3/2017 6/30/2018 PA&ED FY 17/18Chigo Dike Riverside Adams St at 91 IC 935,000 EngPSR FY 17/18Evita PremdasCounty of Riverside for MenifeeSTPLN 5956(262) I‐215/Scott Rd IC (Phase I) 8,000,000 Con9/1/2017PS&E FY 17/18Subtotal 246,200 8,935,000 LOCAL HWYChigo Dike BanningSTPL 5214(011)Ramsey St. Pavement Rehab182,000 ConCleared 5/16/2017PA&ED FY 16/17Albert Vergel de DiosIndian Wells STPL 5401(003)Cook Street Rubberized Overlay Pavement Rehab135,000 ConCleared 12/7/2015 5/30/2016 Cleared 6/30/20161/2/2018 Con FY 16/17Albert Vergel de DiosIndio CML‐5275(030)Paving of Four (4) residential roads in Indio1,132,000 ConCleared7/12/20165/30/2017 6/30/20176/30/2018 6/30/2018 Design FY 17/18Current Project StatusFTIP Funding YearSTP-LFunding PhaseProject ApprovalsRFA Subm. To CT D8 (Projected)RFA MilestoneCaltrans Staff Agency FPN Project LocationCMAQPage 1 of 2
DRAFT FFY 2017/2018 OBLIGATION PLANAs of 3/12/2018PA&EDPA&EDDateMilestone Date R/WR/WDateMilestone DateCurrent Project StatusFTIP Funding YearSTP-LFunding PhaseProject ApprovalsRFA Subm. To CT D8 (Projected)RFA MilestoneCaltrans Staff Agency FPN Project LocationCMAQChigo Dike Moreno ValleyCML 5441(065)Various Locations Signal Synchronization (TCM)1,542,000 ConCleared 10/5/2017 10/5/2017PA&ED FY 15/16Chigo Dike Moreno ValleyCML 5441(063)Cactus, Alessandro and Day (Dynamic Message Signs)341,000 ConCleared 5/26/2017 5/25/2017PA&EDFY 16/17‐will EPSPAlbert Vergel de DiosRancho MirageCML 5412(016)Ramon Rd and Dinah Shore Dr Traffic Flow Imp & Sand Fencing31,000 R/WPA&ED FY 17/18Chigo Dike RiversideSTPL 5058(102)Magnolia Ave from Buchanan to Banbury (Widening 4 ‐6 lns)2,620,000 ConCleared 1/25/2018PA&ED FY 17/18Eric Cowle/ Evita PremdasCVAG6164(021)CVAG Regional Synch 5,315,000 ConCon FY 18/19Evita Premdas Riv. Co.CML 5956(241)Salt Creek Multi‐Modal Trail 5,090,000 ConCleared 10/20/2017 6/30/2017Con FY 17/18Subtotal 13,451,000 2,937,000 Total 13,697,200 11,872,000 Page 2 of 2
AGENDA ITEM 10
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 10.
AGENDA ITEM 11
A presentation will be made but
there is no attachment to the
agenda for item 11.