Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout11 November 27, 2017 Western Riverside County Programs and ProjectsComments are welcomed by the Commission. If you wish to provide comments to the Commission, please complete and submit a Speaker Card to the Clerk of the Board. MEETING AGENDA Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Time: 1:30 p.m. Date: November 27, 2017 Location: BOARD ROOM County of Riverside Administration Center 4080 Lemon St, First Floor, Riverside CA 92501 COMMITTEE MEMBERS Deborah Franklin, Chair/Art Welch, City of Banning Adam Rush, Vice Chair/Clint Lorimore, City of Eastvale Karen Spiegel/Randy Fox, City of Corona Brian Berkson/Verne Lauritzen, City of Jurupa Valley Neil Winter/John Denver, City of Menifee Victoria Baca/To Be Appointed, City of Moreno Valley Berwin Hanna/Ted Hoffman, City of Norco Michael Vargas/Rita Rogers, City of Perris Andrew Kotyuk/Scott Miller, City of San Jacinto Ben Benoit/Timothy Walker, City of Wildomar Kevin Jeffries, County of Riverside, District I Marion Ashley, County of Riverside, District V STAFF Anne Mayer, Executive Director John Standiford, Deputy Executive Director AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY Air Quality, Capital Projects, Communications and Outreach Programs, Intermodal Programs, Motorist Services, New Corridors, Regional Agencies/Regional Planning, Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP), Specific Transit Projects, State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program, and Provide Policy Direction on Transportation Programs and Projects related to Western Riverside County and other areas as may be prescribed by the Commission. COMM-WRC-00043 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Riverside County Transportation Commission Tara Byerly, Deputy Clerk of the Board November 21, 2017 Possible Conflicts of Interest Issues -Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Agenda of November 27, 2017 The November 27 agenda of the WRC Programs and Projects Committee includes items which may raise possible conflicts of interest. A RCTC member may not participate in any discussion or action concerning a contract or amendment if a campaign contribution of more than $250 is received in the past 12 months or 3 months following the conclusion from any entity or individual listed. Agenda Item No. 7 -Amendment to the Agreement for RCTC 91 Express Lanes Traffic and Revenue Study Services Consultant(s): Stantec Consulting, Inc. Sheldon Mar, Senior Associate 475 5th Avenue, 12th Floor New York, NY 10017 Alexandra Rackerby From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Alexandra Rackerby Tuesday, November 21, 2017 1 :52 PM Alexandra Rackerby RCTC: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee Conflict of Interest Form.pdf; Conflict of Interest Memo.pdf Good afternoon Members of the WRC Programs and Projects Committee: The November WRC Programs and Projects Committee is posted on the website - http://rctcdev.info/uploads/media items/western-riverside-county-programs-and-projects-committee-november-27- 2017.original.pdf Also, attached is the Conflict of Interest Memo and Form for your information. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you. Respectfully, Allie Rackerby Records Technician Riverside County Transportation Commission 951.787.7141 w 4080 Lemon St. 3rd Fl. I P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502 rctc.org f "# in e 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE www.rctc.org    AGENDA*  *Actions may be taken on any item listed on the agenda  1:30 p.m.  Monday, November 27, 2017    BOARD ROOM  County Administrative Center  4080 Lemon Street, First Floor  Riverside, California    In compliance with the Brown Act and Government Code Section 54957.5, agenda materials distributed 72  hours prior to the meeting, which are public records relating to open session agenda items, will be available for  inspection by members of the public prior to the meeting at the Commission office, 4080 Lemon Street, Third  Floor, Riverside, CA, and on the Commission’s website, www.rctc.org.    In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Government Code Section 54954.2, and the Federal  Transit Administration Title VI, please contact the Clerk of the Board at (951) 787‐7141 if special assistance is  needed to participate in a Commission meeting, including accessibility and translation services.  Assistance is  provided free of charge.  Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting time will assist staff in assuring  reasonable arrangements can be made to provide assistance at the meeting.    1. CALL TO ORDER    2. ROLL CALL     3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE    4. PUBLIC COMMENTS – Each individual speaker is limited to speak three (3) continuous minutes  or less.  The Committee may, either at the direction of the Chair or by majority vote of the  Committee, waive this three minute time limitation.  Depending on the number of items on the  Agenda and the number of speakers, the Chair may, at his/her discretion, reduce the time of  each speaker to two (2) continuous minutes.  Also, the Committee may terminate public  comments if such comments become repetitious.  In addition, the maximum time for public  comment for any individual item or topic is thirty (30) minutes.  Speakers may not yield their  time to others without the consent of the Chair.  Any written documents to be distributed or  presented to the Committee shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board.  This policy applies  to Public Comments and comments on Agenda Items.   Under the Brown Act, the Board should not take action on or discuss matters raised during  public comment portion of the agenda which are not listed on the agenda.  Board members  may refer such matters to staff for factual information or to be placed on the subsequent  agenda for consideration.    5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – OCTOBER 23, 2017  Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee  November 27, 2017  Page 2   6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS (The Committee may add an item to the Agenda after making a  finding that there is a need to take immediate action on the item and that the item came to  the attention of the Committee subsequent to the posting of the agenda.  An action adding an  item to the agenda requires 2/3 vote of the Committee.  If there are less than 2/3 of the  Committee members present, adding an item to the agenda requires a unanimous vote.   Added items will be placed for discussion at the end of the agenda.)  7. AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR RCTC 91 EXPRESS LANES TRAFFIC AND REVENUE  STUDY SERVICES  Page 1  Overview     This item is for the Committee to:     1) Approve Agreement No. 10‐31‐099‐07, Amendment No. 7 to Agreement No.  10‐31‐099‐00, with Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) for investment grade  traffic and revenue study services for an additional amount of $635,000, for a total  amount not to exceed $2,050,877;    2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute  the agreement on behalf of the Commission;   3) Approve an increase to the FY 2017/18 budget of $635,000 for professional services  expenditures; and   4) Forward to the Commission for final action.  8. ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR CONSTRUCTION ZONE ENHANCED ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM  INCLUDED IN THE STATE FURNISHED MATERIALS CATEGORY FOR THE STATE ROUTE 91  CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT  Page 10  Overview     This item is for the Committee to:     1) Authorize an increase in the expenditures for the Construction Zone Enhanced  Enforcement Program (COZEEP) under Agreement No. 12‐31‐070‐00 for the State  Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (91 Project) for an additional amount of  $400,000, for a total amount not to exceed $5.5 million; and    2) Forward to the Commission for final action.                Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee  November 27, 2017  Page 3   9. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF CORONA FOR MAINTENANCE OF NEW CITY  STREETS PRIOR TO TRANSFER OF TITLE AS PART OF THE STATE ROUTE 91 CORRIDOR  IMPROVEMENT PROJECT  Page 12  Overview     This item is for the Committee to:     1) Approve Agreement No. 18‐31‐076‐00, with the city of Corona (City) for maintenance  of new city streets prior to transfer of title as part of the State Route 91 Corridor  Improvement Project (91 Project), in an amount not to exceed $25,000;   2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute  the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and   3) Forward to the Commission for final action.  10. CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH DALKE & SONS CONSTRUCTION INC. FOR THE PERRIS  VALLEY LINE PLATFORM CANOPIES    Page 24  Overview     This item is for the Committee to:     1) Award Agreement No. 18‐33‐051‐00 to Dalke & Sons Construction Inc. (Dalke), as the  lowest responsive, responsible bidder, for the construction of the Perris Valley Line  (PVL) Platform Canopy project (Project) in the amount of $2,078,391, plus a  contingency amount of $311,759, for a total amount not to exceed $2,390,150;    2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute  the agreement on behalf of the Commission;   3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency work pursuant  to the agreement terms up to the total amount;    4) Authorize the payment of pass‐through costs for flagging services in an amount not to  exceed $475,000;   5) Approve an increase to the FY 2017/18 budget of $434,000 for flagging expenditures;  and   6) Forward to the Commission for final action.      11. COMMISSIONERS / STAFF REPORT     Overview      This item provides the opportunity for the Commissioners and staff to report on attended and  upcoming meeting/conferences and issues related to Commission activities.    12. ADJOURNMENT        RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS SIGN-IN SHEET November 27, 2017 NAME AGENCY ,. -' E MAILADDRESS \ f I &hvitL 1YJJ!.A-J f,;+u ~ M _w-U16 1/1/ h '~ l/i~ f;-,7)1 £., ~,,~ It /. w ·t... /c3~...-ov',r--L~ v f 7 ,.,. :/ .;\)/A'\ . e7 ,<./ tN~L-./Jtl~~ A 11.\h....., R--r /' ~ t()/"I v- \\r 1r--, 1fJ4 r /4J1-e ~ -ii_~Aw--. I dJ #A--A/01?. UJ / !""'-?( ~·~/~d_.')k P..a.rhhP , k -- f ;r1AJ ,'Td//216 Re-; t4->;-..L , /\It'll ~ I ;v.'[f3-!l-tl/~F~c t.e"'~~,nt-:e Q~ Cvh~ aA£A.~/ u~ t!A?U..tt" ~·s ·~(')A o --fl A~On I? l vco 0 / RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE ROLL CALL NOVEMBER 27, 2017 County of Riverside, District I County of Riverside, District V City of Banning City of Corona City of Eastvale City of Jurupa Valley City of Menifee' City of Moreno Valley City of Norco City of Perris City of San Jacinto City of Wildomar Absent o o .. :T-• 1 ·:;~PM D ~+ '·.'3»S P/Vl ,A!!' D D D D D D D z D AGENDA ITEM 5 MINUTES RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION    WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS COMMITTEE    Monday, October 23, 2017    MINUTES    1. CALL TO ORDER    The meeting of the Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee was  called to order by Chair Deborah Franklin at 1:31 p.m., in the Board Room at the  County of Riverside Administrative Center, 4080 Lemon Street, First Floor, Riverside,  California, 92501.    2. ROLL CALL    3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE    At this time, Commissioner Victoria Baca led the Western Riverside County Programs  and Projects Committee in a flag salute.    Members/Alternates Present Members Absent     Marion Ashley* Ben Benoit  Victoria Baca Kevin Jeffries  Brian Berkson Andrew Kotyuk  Deborah Franklin   Berwin Hanna   Adam Rush*   Karen Spiegel   Michael Vargas   Neil Winter   *arrived after the meeting started     4. PUBLIC COMMENTS    There were no requests to speak from the public.    5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – SEPTEMBER 25, 2017     M/S/C (Spiegel/Baca) to approve the minutes as submitted.      RCTC WRC Programs and Projects Committee Minutes   October 23, 2017  Page 2  6. ADDITIONS/REVISIONS    There were no additions or revisions to the agenda.     At this time, Commissioner Marion Ashley arrived.    7. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ON‐CALL STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP ADVISOR  SERVICES WITH WSP USA INC. FOR THE 15/91 EXPRESS LANES CONNECTOR PROJECT    Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director, presented the scope of the amendment to  the agreement for on‐call strategic partnership advisor services with WSP USA Inc. for  the 15/91 Express Lanes Connector Project.    M/S/C (Vargas/Winter) to:    1) Approve Agreement No. 06‐66‐027‐23, Amendment No. 12 to  Agreement No. 06‐66‐027‐00, with WSP USA Inc., formerly Parsons  Brinckerhoff, Inc., to provide project management services for the  proposed 15/91 Express Lanes Connector (15/91 ELC) Project in the  amount of $1,282,366, plus a contingency amount of $128,237, for a  total amount not to exceed $1,410,603;  2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel  review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission;  3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency  work up to the total not to exceed amount as required for the project;  and  4) Forward to the Commission for final action.     Recuse:  Commissioner Spiegel    8. AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL‐ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION  MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE INTERSTATE 15 EXPRESS LANES REGIONAL  OPERATIONS CENTER AND STORAGE AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY BUILDOUTS    John Tarascio, Bechtel Project Manager, presented the scope of the agreement for  architectural‐engineering and construction management services for the Interstate 15  Express Lanes regional operations center and storage and maintenance facility  buildouts.    In response to Commissioner Franklin’s question regarding an approximate timeline for  the project, John Tarascio stated the item is going to the November Commission  meeting for approval, design should be completed by the spring, and should have a  construction procurement by the summer, and the facilities are due to be turned over  to the toll systems provider in the summer of 2019.     RCTC WRC Programs and Projects Committee Minutes   October 23, 2017  Page 3  M/S/C (Baca/Vargas) to:    1) Award Agreement No. 18‐31‐006‐00 to Owen Group, Inc. (Owen Group)  to provide architectural‐engineering (A‐E) and construction  management (CM) services for the I‐15 Express Lanes Regional  Operations Center (ROC) and Storage and Maintenance Facility (SAM)  buildouts (Project) in the amount of $550,052, plus a contingency  amount of $55,005, for a total amount not to exceed $605,057;   2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel  review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission;  3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency  work pursuant to the agreement terms up to the total amount; and  4) Forward to the Commission for final action.    9. AGREEMENT FOR PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT,  PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, AND PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR THE  CONSTRUCTION OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER TRAIL PROJECT THROUGH THE GREEN  RIVER GOLF COURSE    Alex Menor, Capital Projects Manager, presented the scope of the agreement for  preparation of the final environmental document, preliminary engineering, and plans,  specifications and estimates for the construction of the Santa Ana River Trail Project  through the Green River Golf Course.    In response to Commissioner Franklin’s question regarding the golf course owners’  opinions on the Santa Ana River Trail going through or near the golf course, Alex Menor  said the owners are very supportive of the project.    Anne Mayer noted this trail has been very important to Riverside and San Bernardino  Counties and has taken a long time to push through the channels to get this project on  its way.     Commissioner Berwin Hanna commented on the positive progress this project has  made.     M/S/C (Berkson/Ashley) to:    1) Award Agreement No. 17‐67‐027‐00 to Michael Baker International  (Michael Baker) to prepare a final environmental document; perform  preliminary engineering services; prepare plans, specifications, and  estimates (PS&E); and provide construction design support services for  the construction of the Santa Ana River Trail (SART) 2 project through  Green River Golf Course (Project) in the amount of $1,142,691, plus a  contingency amount of $114,269 for potential changes in scope, for a  total amount not to exceed $1,256,960;   RCTC WRC Programs and Projects Committee Minutes   October 23, 2017  Page 4  2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel  review and contingent upon Riverside County Regional Park and Open‐ Space District (Park District) execution of a Proposition 84 Grant funding  agreement, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission;  3) Authorize the Executive Director or designee to approve contingency  work as may be required for the Project;  4) Approve Agreement No. 18‐67‐064‐00 with BNSF Railway (BNSF) to  define the roles and responsibilities of each party regarding safety  related and design review services for the Project, in an amount not to  exceed $300,000;  5) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel  review, to execute the agreements on behalf of the Commission; and  6) Forward to the Commission for final action.    10. AGREEMENTS FOR ON‐CALL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES, MATERIALS  TESTING, AND CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING SERVICES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF  COMMUTER RAIL STATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS    Patti Castillo, Capital Projects Manager, presented the scope of the agreements for on‐ call construction management services, materials testing, and construction surveying  services for the construction of commuter rail station capital improvement projects.    M/S/C (Spiegel/Baca) to:    1) Award the following agreements to provide on‐call construction  management services, materials testing, and construction surveying  services (collectively, CM services) for the construction of commuter rail  station capital improvement projects for a three‐year term, and one,  two‐year option to extend the agreements, in an amount not to exceed  an aggregate value of $7.5 million;  a) Agreement No. 17‐33‐099‐00 to HDR Construction Control  Corporation;   b) Agreement No. 17‐33‐121‐00 to Kleinfelder; and  c) Agreement No. 17‐33‐122‐00 to S2 Engineering, Inc.;   2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel  review, to execute the agreements, including option years, on behalf of  the Commission;   3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to execute task orders  awarded to the consultants under the terms of the agreements; and  4) Forward to the Commission for final action.    At this time, Commissioner Adam Rush joined the meeting.      RCTC WRC Programs and Projects Committee Minutes   October 23, 2017  Page 5  11. CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH LOS ANGELES ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE LA  SIERRA PARKING LOT EXPANSION    Patti Castillo, Capital Projects Manager, presented the scope of the agreement with LA  Engineering, Inc. for the La Sierra parking lot expansion.     In response to Commissioner Spiegel’s question regarding the current bus bay being  added to the six new ones or if it will stay in its current location, Patti Castillo replied the  current bus bay location will stay there and the express bus service is coming into the  new bays.     Commissioner Spiegel requested Patti Castillo to reconfirm with RTA all bus bays will be  together and not leave the current one out of the new area.     Patti Castillo clarified the current parking situation for Commissioner Neil Winter.     Patti Castillo clarified the apartment building parking layout for Commissioner Brian  Berkson.    Anne Mayer added there are gates and security at those locations and the Commission  is unaware of any complaints of the apartment using the station’s parking lots.    Commissioner Franklin asked what the impact will be during construction.    Patti responded some of the parking spaces will be removed during construction to  accommodate the use of an addition of a bus exit.  The station is losing 23 permanent  parking spaces.    In response to Commissioner Rush’s question regarding a laydown yard and  construction employee parking, Patti Castillo said it will be addressed with the  contractor during the preconstruction meetings.     Anne Mayer pointed out the 15 percent contingency for the project since this is an  active transportation station and the Commission needs to make sure the public is  inconvenienced as little as possible.     Commissioner Brian Berkson suggested the Commission lease parking spots from the  bowling alley during construction.     M/S/C (Vargas/Baca) to:    1) Award Agreement No. 18‐33‐123‐00 to Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. (LA  Engineering), as the lowest responsible, responsive bidder, for the  construction of the La Sierra Parking Lot Expansion project (Project) in  RCTC WRC Programs and Projects Committee Minutes   October 23, 2017  Page 6  the amount of $4,095,100, plus a contingency amount of $614,265 for a  total amount not to exceed $4,709,365;   2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel  review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission;  3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency  work pursuant to the agreement terms up to the total amount;   4) Authorize the Executive Director to enter into agreements, or  amendments to existing agreements, as determined appropriate, with  BNSF Railway (BNSF) and city of Riverside Public Utilities for flagging  and utility connection fees for an amount not to exceed $200,000; and  5) Forward to the Commission for final action.    12. AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE  OPERATION OF THE FREEWAY SERVICE PATROL PROGRAM IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY  Brian Cunanan, Commuter and Motorist Assistance Manager, presented the scope of  the agreement with the California Department of Transportation for the operation of  the Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) program in Riverside County.    Brian Cunanan updated Commissioner Rush on the issue of lack of vendors.  The  Commission will be doing outreach to garner more interest in the program and to clear  up any misconceptions regarding the FSP program.    Anne Mayer added the program is very strict and regimented and it is probably a  daunting thought to have to make such drastic changes to their company.  She  suggestedthe outreach the Commission does will help with the preconceived notions of  the program.     M/S/C (Vargas/Winter) to:    1) Approve Agreement No. 18‐45‐047‐00 with the California Department  of Transportation (Caltrans) for the operation of the Riverside County  Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) program in the amount not to exceed  $1,613,144 in state funding for Fiscal Year 2017/18;   2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel  review, to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and  3) Forward to the Commission for final action.    13. 2018 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MEASURE A SPECIALIZED TRANSIT THREE‐YEAR  CALL FOR PROJECTS    Monica Morales, Management Analyst, presented the details of the 2018 Western  Riverside County Measure A Specialized Transit Three‐Year Call for Projects.    M/S/C (Baca/Vargas) to:  RCTC WRC Programs and Projects Committee Minutes   October 23, 2017  Page 7    1) Approve the release of the 2018 Western Riverside County Measure A  Specialized Transit Three‐Year Call for Projects (2018 Call for Projects)  for approximately $8.2 million covering Fiscal Years 2018/19 – 2020/21  for Western Riverside County (Western County);   2) Authorize staff to advertise the availability of funding and to solicit  project proposals from non‐profit agencies and other interested parties  or operators; and   3) Forward to the Commission for final action.    14. COMMISSIONERS / STAFF REPORT    14A. Commissioner Spiegel congratulated the Commission on the success of the 91  Project and requested additional support for the city of Corona due to the  impacts from the 91 Project.    15. ADJOURNMENT    There being no further business for consideration by the Western Riverside County  Programs and Projects Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 2:23 p.m.    Respectfully submitted,        Tara Byerly  Deputy Clerk of the Board  AGENDA ITEM 7 Agenda Item 7  RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION  DATE: November 27, 2017  TO: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee  FROM: Jennifer Crosson, Toll Operations Manager  THROUGH: Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director  SUBJECT: Amendment to the Agreement for RCTC 91 Express Lanes Traffic and Revenue  Study Services    STAFF RECOMMENDATION:    This item is for the Committee to:     1) Approve Agreement No. 10‐31‐099‐07, Amendment No. 7 to Agreement No.   10‐31‐099‐00, with Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) for investment grade traffic  and revenue study services for an additional amount of $635,000, for a total amount not  to exceed $2,050,877;   2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute  the agreement on behalf of the Commission;   3) Approve an increase to the FY 2017/18 budget of $635,000 for professional services  expenditures; and  4) Forward to the Commission for final action.    BACKGROUND INFORMATION:    In September of 2010, the Commission entered into Agreement No. 10‐31‐099‐00 with Stantec  for the purpose of providing investment grade traffic and revenue study services for the State  Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project (91 Project).  The traffic and revenue study services  performed by Stantec included assumptions regarding traffic volumes and toll revenues used to  successfully complete the financing of the 91 Project.  The financing resulted in the issuance of  $176.7 million of toll revenue bonds and execution of a $421.1 million Transportation  Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act loan to be repaid with net toll revenue generated from  the RCTC 91 Express Lanes (91 Express Lanes).     To ensure the toll rates on the 91 Express Lanes were consistent with the assumptions put forth  in the traffic and revenue study, Stantec assisted with the development of the 91 Express Lanes  toll policy adopted by the Commission on June 7, 2012. Stantec assisted with the development  of the opening day toll rates presented to the Commission in October 2016 in advance of the 91  Express Lanes opening.    On March 20, 2017, the 91 Express Lanes opened and commenced toll collection. The actual  traffic volumes have exceeded projected traffic volumes and the toll policy, as adopted in 2012,  1 Agenda Item 7  has required evaluation to adequately manage the unanticipated demand. Stantec’s services  have been critical to the evaluation of the toll policy and ongoing toll rate adjustments required  to manage the 91 Express Lanes traffic.  Stantec has also performed the collection and analysis  of traffic data and traffic modeling to assist with the evaluation of physical improvements to the  91 Express Lanes to improve the flow of traffic.    In June 2017, the Commission approved the addition of $175,000 to the Stantec contract through  the annual recurring contracts process.  At that time, the 91 Express Lanes had been operational  for about two months and the level of effort required by Stantec to perform regular reviews of  the toll rates, toll policy and traffic modeling was underestimated.  At this time, an additional  $635,000 is requested for Stantec to assist with the continued evaluation of the 91 Express Lanes.     The additional $635,000 will allow Stantec to provide the following services:     Developing and evaluating solutions that will improve traffic flow by either geometric  roadway or toll policy changes;   Evaluation of the impact to any proposed changes on the 91 Express Lanes traffic and  revenue projections;   Reforecasting the 91 Express Lanes traffic and revenue study to include proposed changes  in roadway limits or geometry and toll policy changes;   Conducting travel time studies;    Collecting data at critical traffic management points through third party sources and  analyzing such data;   Analyzing the 91 Express Lanes traffic and revenue to assist with the establishment of  holiday and seasonal toll schedules; and   Assisting with ongoing toll rate adjustments.    The ongoing support of Stantec during the balance of FY 2017/18 is critical to the short and long‐ term success of the 91 Express Lanes.  Stantec has the detailed knowledge for the basis of the  traffic and revenue projections which supported the financing of the 91 Express Lanes.  It is  important that Stantec’s knowledge of the traffic and revenue study be applied to the evaluation  of future improvements to the 91 Express Lanes and the adjustment of toll rates.  Without the  expertise of Stantec, changes could negatively impact the projected traffic and revenue.    Staff reviewed and negotiated Stantec’s cost proposal and determined it to be fair and  reasonable.    Recommendation    Staff recommends approval of Agreement No. 10‐31‐099‐07, Amendment No. 7 to Agreement  No. 10‐31‐099‐00, with Stantec for investment grade traffic and revenue study services for an  additional amount of $635,000, and a total amount not to exceed $2,050,877.  Staff also  recommends authorization for the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review,  to execute the agreement on behalf of the Commission.     2 Agenda Item 7  Additional budget authorization of $635,000 for FY 2017/18 is needed to cover the amount  requested in the amendment.    Financial Information  In Fiscal Year Budget: No Year: FY 2017/18 Amount: $635,000   Source of Funds:  Toll revenues, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds  proceeds for 91 Project completion,  and/or commercial paper proceeds  Budget Adjustment: Yes  GL/Project Accounting No.: 009199 65520 591 31 65520    $541,600  003028 65520 262 31 65520    $ 93,400  Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 11/15/2017    Attachment:  Agreement No. 10‐31‐099‐07 for Investment Grade Traffic and Revenue Study  Services with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.   3 17336.00009\29870183.1 Agreement No. 10-31-099-07 AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO AGREEMENT FOR INVESTMENT GRADE TRAFFIC AND REVENUE STUDY SERVICES WITH STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. 1. PARTIES AND DATE This Amendment No. 7 to the Agreement for investment-grade traffic and revenue study services is made and entered into as of _____________, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (“Commission”) and STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. ("Consultant"). 2. RECITALS 2.1 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into an agreement dated September 1, 2010 for the purpose of providing investment-grade traffic and revenue study services (the "Master Agreement"). 2.2 The Commission released contingency funds to the Consultant, for the continued provision of Consultant’s services, on October 26, 2011, in the amount of Eight Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($8,500). 2.3 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Master Agreement, dated February 7, 2012, for the purpose of extending the term for the continued provision of investment-grade traffic and revenue study services. 2.4 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Master Agreement, dated March 13, 2013, for the purpose of releasing additional contingency funds previously authorized by the Commission Board and amending the rate provided under the Master Agreement for the Project Manager, all to provide for the continued provision of investment-grade traffic and revenue study services required by the Commission. 2.5 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 3 to the Master Agreement, dated April 3, 2013, for the purpose of providing additional compensation for the continued provision of investment-grade traffic and revenue study services. 4 17336.00009\29870183.1 2.6 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 4 to the Master Agreement, dated February 10, 2014, for the purpose of extending the term of the Master Agreement. 2.7 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 5 to the Master Agreement, dated April 10, 2017, for the purpose of adding compensation for continued investment-grade traffic and revenue study services. 2.8 The Commission and the Consultant have entered into Amendment No. 6 to the Master Agreement, dated June 14, 2017, for the purpose of providing additional compensation for continued investment-grade traffic and revenue study services and to revise the Scope of Services included under Amendment No. 5, as pertains to the data requirements. 2.9 The parties now desire to amend the Master Agreement in order to revise the Services and to provide additional compensation for continued investment-grade traffic and revenue study services. 3. TERMS 3.1 The Services defined in the Master Agreement, as previously amended, shall be deleted in their entirety and replaced with the Services identified in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Services shall be performed expeditiously within the term of the Master Agreement, as previously amended. 3.2 The maximum compensation for Services performed pursuant to this Amendment No. 7 shall not exceed Six Hundred Thirty-Five Thousand Dollars ($635,000). 3.3 The total contract value for the Master Agreement, as amended by Amendment No.1 through this Amendment No. 7, is hereby increased from One Million Four Hundred Fifteen Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($1,415,877) to Two Million Fifty Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy- Seven Dollars ($2,050,877). 3.4 Except as amended by this Amendment, all provisions of the Master Agreement, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1 through 6 including without limitation the indemnity and insurance provisions, shall remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the parties under this Amendment. 5 17336.00009\29870183.1 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT NO. 10-31-099-07 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the Agreement on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANTEC CONSULTING TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SERVICES, INC. By:__________________________ _________________________ John F. Tavaglione, Chair Signature __________________________ Name __________________________ Title APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST: By: _____________________________ By: _______________________ Best, Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel Its: _______________________ * A corporation requires the signatures of two corporate officers. One signature shall be that of the chairman of board, the president or any vice president and the second signature (on the attest line) shall be that of the secretary, any assistant secretary, the chief financial officer or any assistant treasurer of such corporation. If the above persons are not the intended signators, evidence of signature authority shall be provided to RCTC. 6 17336.00009\29870183.1 EXHIBIT “A” SCOPE OF SERVICES The following covers additional Stantec effort from November 13, 2017 to June 30, 2018. Task 1: Congestion Management The Consultant will assist the Commission in managing congestion in the SR 91 Corridor. Efforts would include developing solutions to improve traffic flow via geometric or toll policy changes. These changes could be assessed via micro-simulation modeling, or spreadsheet modeling. This additional budget would allow for the analysis of 5 additional congestion management analyses. Deliverable: A memo describing methodology and results of analyses. Task 2: Traffic and Revenue Impacts The Consultant will assist the Commission with assessing the impact of various congestion management solutions to RCTC 91 Express Lanes traffic and revenue. This additional budget would permit the Consultant to assess 4 additional scenarios. Deliverable: Forecasts of traffic and revenue impact, and brief memo discussing assumptions and results. Task 3: Presentations The Consultant will present results of traffic analyses to Commission staff in-person. The additional budget would provide for 2 additional in-person presentations. Task 4: Data Collection The Consultant will assist the Commission in collecting and analyzing travel time data on the SR 91 GP and Express Lanes in Riverside County, and reviewing traffic volumes. Travel time data would be collected by Transportation Studies Inc., or other comparable sub- consultants approved by the Commission. Travel time studies would be conducted during the AM and PM peak periods with two to three drivers for a total of 24-hours per study. GPS equipment would be used to collect the data, and in-vehicle video cameras will be setup to record the traffic conditions during the drive. Traffic counts would be obtained directly from the Commission. This additional budget would allow for 3 additional travel time studies and 3 additional volume studies. Deliverables: 1) Tables in Excel format showing summarized travel times, travel speeds, and volumes. Additional Budget Requested for Tasks 1-4: $175,000 7 17336.00009\29870183.1 Task 5: RCTC 91 Express Lanes T&R Refresh The consultant will forecast long term RCTC 91 EL traffic and revenue considering actual performance to date, recent socioeconomic conditions, updated regional roadway improvement plans, and proposed changes to the 91 Express Lanes configuration and pricing policy. Since the publication of the original RCTC 91 Express Lanes T&R forecast, actual performance has exceeded expectations, and several network and policy changes have been proposed. The combination of these factors may result in a need to re-baseline the T&R forecasts to actual performance and to account for the proposed changes. Proposed changes include:  Funding of the 15/91 ELC (formerly known as the “North DC”). This project may open by 2022.  An easterly extension of the express lanes toward Promenade Avenue.  A change to the 91 EL pricing policy to set prices based on each individual single- lane segment’s utilization, as opposed to the dual-lane mainline flow.  A change to the 91 EL pricing policy to accommodate the revealed capacity of the EL’s.  Changes to the westbound 91 mixing area at the Riverside/Orange County Line. In addition to the proposed roadway and policy changes, the T&R forecasts would be updated to reflect the actual utilization of the GP and express lanes, recent views on future land use in Southern California, and changes to roadway improvements as identified in SCAG’s 2016-2040 RTP. Seven tasks would be included in this effort: 1) Traffic Data Collection and Review 2) Socio-economic forecasts 3) Model Development 4) Traffic and Revenue Forecasting 5) Meetings and Presentations Traffic Data Collection and Review: Traffic data in and around the SR 91 corridor would be collected and analyzed to inform the re-baselining of the T&R forecasts. We assume the 91 Express Lanes TOC would be a principal source of data, and would be obtained directly from the RCTC. This data would include Express Lanes traffic counts (toll paying vs. HOV), general purpose lane traffic counts, weaving patterns between the OCTA EL’s, RCTC EL’s, and TCA’s SR 241 toll road. In addition, supplemental traffic counts at various on/off ramps would be collected via our sub-consultant Transportation Studies Inc., and from PeMS loop detectors. Up to 50 tube counts would be conducted across a 1- 2 week period during typical weekdays. Socio-economic Forecasts: Forecasts of population, households, and employment by traffic analysis zone (TAZ) will be updated for use in the travel demand model. The forecasts will largely be derived from work previously completed by Stantec for the I-15 ELP T&R study (done in 2015), but may be revised following a review of the SCAG 2016 forecasts which were made available following the completion of the I-15 ELP work. The socioeconomic forecast review and update would be performed by WSP (formerly PB), who also completed the original RCTC 91 EL and I-15 ELP T&R forecasts. 8 17336.00009\29870183.1 Model Development: RCTC 91 EL T&R will primarily be developed from a combination of a regional travel demand model (based on the SCAG and RivTAM models) and a VISSIM micro-simulation model, both previously developed for the I-15 ELP T&R forecast. These existing models will serve as a baseline for modeling the SR 91. Both the travel demand model and simulation models would be re-calibrated to replicate existing RCTC 91 EL usage. As part of the model development and re-calibration, Stantec will review the planned roadway improvements listed in the SCAG 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and incorporate changes to the model as needed. One key change to the roadway network is the inclusion of the 15/91 ELC, a tolled direct-connector ramp between the RCTC 91 EL’s, and the I-15 ELP north of SR 91. Traffic and Revenue Forecast: Stantec will forecast annual T&R for the RCTC 91 EL’s through FY 2068, matching the original T&R forecast’s term. The forecasts would incorporate changes to the RCTC 91 EL roadway configuration as outlined by the RCTC, as well as changes to the toll policy, as described earlier. Meetings and Presentations: Stantec will participate in up to 6 conference calls with RCTC staff throughout the duration of the task, and up to two in-person meetings at the RCTC offices to present on the results of the updated T&R. A T&R report will also be prepared to document assumptions, methodology, and results. We expect this effort would be completed from 4 to 6 months following notice-to- proceed, at a budget of $460,000. Total Additional Budget Requested (Tasks 1-5): $635,000 9 Jennifer Crosson, Toll Operations ManagerSTANTEC CONSULTING INC. CONTRACTCommittee Meeting November 27, 2017 Responding to the Community•Listening to community and customer feedback•Daily monitoring of express lane performance•Weekly meetings and decision-making•Physical improvements have been made and will continue•Changes require thoughtful analysis and approval by others first 050,000100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,0003/25/2017 4/25/2017 5/25/2017 6/25/2017 7/25/2017 8/25/2017 9/25/2017Actual vs. Projected Weekly TripsActual TripsProjected Trips Afternoon Congestion at Eastbound 91/15 SplitDay of Week Period of Backup*Length of BackupMonday/Tuesday < 15 MinutesUp to ½ mileWednesday/Thursday < 15 minutesUp to 1 mileFriday 1 to 3 hoursUp to 1 mile* Period of backup reflects the average length of time a backup is sustained if it occurs during the afternoon peak period. " Temporary Changeable Message Sign" Overhead Sign Changes" Additional Overhead Sign" Pavement Markers15/91 Lane Confusion" Single Lane Capacity Monitoring" Single Lane Toll Rate IncreasesToo Much Demand" Reduced Channelizer Spacing by halfLong Vehicle Headway Need to get photo j_ Morning Congestion at Westbound McKinley EntranceDay of Week Period of Backup*Length of BackupMonday through Thursday 3-4 hours Up to 1 mileFriday <1 hour Up to ½ mile* Period of backup reflects the average length of time a backup is sustained if it occurs during the morning peak period. Congestion at WB Entrance to Express LanesSlowing at entrance to Express LanesCustomers cutting into line•Extended the buffer zone between the point where vehicle meet from the 91 and 15•Extended the entrance auxiliary lane by 1,500 ft•Extended the entrance point to the Express Lanes by 1,500 feet•Increased toll ratesSlowing at Entrance•CHP sitting in shoulder to deter lane cuttersMotorists Cutting in prior to Entrance Lessons Learned So Far•SR 91 Traffic is Seasonal–Different patterns in the spring vs. summer vs. fall–Holidays greatly impact traffic•Single Lane Capacity is Critical to Congestion Management•Difficult to Determine Driver Response to Changes•Demand Elasticity Appears Minimal During Peak SR 91 Joint Advisory Committee•March 2018 Meeting–Presentation of pre-construction data–Presentation of post-construction data Proposed Amendment•Perform Microsimulation Modeling•Conduct Travel Time Studies•Continue to Collect Single Lane Data•Support Revision of Toll Policy and Toll Rate Adjustments•Evaluate Impact of Changes on Traffic and Revenue Report Recommendation•Approve amendment 7 to Agreement No. 10-31-099 with Stantec;•Authorize the Chair or Executive Director to execute the amendment;•Approve an increase to the Fiscal Year 2017/18 budget in the amount of $635,000; and•Forward to the Commission for final action. AGENDA ITEM 8 Agenda Item 8  RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION  DATE: November 20, 2017  TO: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee  FROM: David Thomas, Toll Project Manager  THROUGH: Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director  SUBJECT:  Additional Funding for Construction Zone Enhanced Enforcement Program  Included in the State Furnished Materials Category for the State Route 91  Corridor Improvement Project     STAFF RECOMMENDATION:    This item is for the Committee to:     1) Authorize an increase in the expenditures for the Construction Zone Enhanced  Enforcement Program (COZEEP) under Agreement No. 12‐31‐070‐00 for the State Route  91 Corridor Improvement Project (91 Project) for an additional amount of $400,000, for  a total amount not to exceed $5.5 million; and   2) Forward to the Commission for final action.    BACKGROUND INFORMATION:    At its July 14, 2010 meeting, the Commission, as part of the authorization for issuance of toll  revenue bonds to finance the 91 Project costs related to the design‐build phase, approved the  form of the design‐build cooperative agreement (agreement) between the Commission and  Caltrans and authorized the Executive Director to approve and execute the final agreement.  The Agreement was executed on July 25, 2012.        Figure 1:  SR‐91 Corridor Improvement Project Vicinity Map   10 Agenda Item 8    The agreement included terms for the Commission to pay Caltrans for State Furnished  Materials (SFM), which at the time contemplated primarily signal controller items estimated at  a cost of $79,902.  Amendment No. 3, approved on February 11, 2014, amended the original  agreement to broaden the definition of SFM to include COZEEP.  Through this amendment,  Caltrans agreed to allow the Commission to utilize its statewide COZEEP contract with the  California Highway Patrol (CHP), eliminating the need for a separate agreement between the  Commission and CHP.  Although Amendment No. 3 was executed and broadened the scope of  SFM, no funding authority was requested at that time from the Commission.      At its June 8, 2016 meeting, the Commission ratified the scope of SFM and authorized the  expenditure of $4.3 million for COZEEP and other SFM, plus a contingency amount of $400,000,  for a total amount not to exceed $4.7 million.  At its June 14, 2017 meeting, the Commission  authorized the expenditure of $800,000 for COZEEP and other SFM, using the remaining  contingency of $400,000 and authorizing an additional $400,000, for a total amount not to  exceed $5.1 million.    Additional COZEEP resources estimated at $400,000 are required to support the 91 Project  through final completion, including another 55‐hour partial weekend closure in January 2018.      Commission authorization is requested for an additional $400,000 to fund the expenditure of all  SFM for the 91 Project for a total amount not to exceed $5.5 million.    Financial Information  In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes Year: FY 2017/18 Amount: $400,000  Source of Funds: Sales tax bond or commercial paper  proceeds for 91 completion Budget Adjustment: No  GL/Project Accounting No.: 003028 81304 00104 0000 262 31 81301 (COZEEP)                      $400,000  Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 11/15/2017    11 AGENDA ITEM 9 Agenda Item 9  RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION  DATE: November 27, 2017  TO: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee  FROM: David Thomas, Toll Project Manager  THROUGH: Michael Blomquist, Toll Program Director  SUBJECT:  Cooperative Agreement with the City of Corona for Maintenance of New City  Streets Prior to Transfer of Title as Part of the State Route 91 Corridor  Improvement Project    STAFF RECOMMENDATION:    This item is for the Committee to:     1) Approve Agreement No. 18‐31‐076‐00, with the city of Corona (City) for maintenance of  new city streets prior to transfer of title as part of the State Route 91 Corridor  Improvement Project (91 Project), in an amount not to exceed $25,000;  2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute  the agreement on behalf of the Commission; and  3) Forward to the Commission for final action.    BACKGROUND INFORMATION:    The 91 Project (shown in Figure 1) included the extension of the 91 Express Lanes in Riverside  County, capacity and interchange improvements along the existing SR‐91 corridor as well as  improvements to City facilities, including construction of new streets in the City.      Figure 1:  SR‐91 Corridor Improvement Project Vicinity Map   12 Agenda Item 9    Approved by the Commission in November 2011, Cooperative Agreement No. 12‐31‐023‐00 for  the 91 Project between the City and the Commission, as subsequently amended, stipulates the  City agrees to assume responsibility of the 91 Project facilities completed within the City’s  jurisdiction upon the City’s acceptance of the work and Commission notification of project  completion to the 91 Project design‐build contractor (Contractor). In order to accept any portions  of new streets constructed within the jurisdiction of the City, the City requires transfer of title to  the City.    There are two instances where new portions of Second Street and Bollero Road in the City have  been completed by the Contractor but are subject to one or more continuing eminent domain  actions; therefore, transfer of title to the City may not happen for as much as a year.    Currently, the Contractor has been maintaining the streets; however, upon achievement of  project completion by the Contractor, the Commission must grant relief of maintenance for the  streets to the Contractor.    Because the City is better suited to maintain streets within the City, staff has had discussions with  the City to enter into a cooperative agreement for the City to accept maintenance of the streets,  prior to transfer of title to the City, subject to reimbursement by the Commission for the City’s  costs.    Since the streets are newly constructed, the anticipated maintenance costs should be minimal.  The proposed Cooperative Agreement No. 18‐31‐076‐00 includes an amount, not to exceed  $25,000, which is estimated to cover the costs for maintenance of these two streets for up to  one year.    Staff recommends approval of Agreement No. 18‐31‐076‐00 with the City for maintenance of  new city streets prior to transfer of title as part of the 91 Project, for a total amount not to exceed  $25,000. Staff also recommends authorization for the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to  legal counsel review, to execute the amendment.    Financial Information  In Fiscal Year Budget: Yes  Year: FY 2017/18 Amount: $25,000  Source of Funds:  2017 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds proceeds  for 91 Project completion or  commercial paper proceeds  Budget Adjustment: No  GL/Project Accounting No.: 003028 86105 00000 0000 262 31 86105         $25,000  Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 11/15/2017    Attachment:  Draft Agreement No. 18‐31‐076‐00 with the city of Corona    13 17336.02100\30224563. 4 1 Agreement No. 18-31-076-00 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF CORONA FOR MAINTENANCE OF NEW STREETS PRIOR TO TRANSFER OF TITLE This Cooperative Agreement (“Cooperative Agreement”) is made and entered into this _____ day of _________, 2017 by and between the Riverside County Transportation Commission (“RCTC”) and the City of Corona (the “City”). RCTC and the City are sometimes referred to herein individually as (“Party”), and collectively as (“Parties”). RECITALS WHEREAS, RCTC is nearing completion of the SR-91 Corridor Improvement Project, which included extension of the 91 Express Lanes in Riverside County, as well as capacity and interchange improvements along the existing SR 91 Corridor (the “Project”). WHEREAS, the Project included improvements to City facilities, including construction of new streets in the City. WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Cooperative Agreement for State Route 91 Express Lanes and Corridor Improvements entered into between the City and RCTC, dated November 9, 2011, as subsequently amended, the City agreed to assume responsibility of the Project facilities completed within the City’s jurisdiction upon the City’s acceptance of the work and RCTC notification of Project completion to the Project design-build contractor (the “Contractor”). WHEREAS, in order to accept any portions of new streets constructed within the jurisdiction of the City, the City requires transfer of title to the City. WHEREAS, certain new portions of Second Street and Bollero Place, as identified in the Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, that have been completed by the Contractor (i) are subject to one or more continuing eminent domain actions, (ii) are pending transfer of title from Caltrans, or (iii) are pending transfer of title from RCTC (the “Streets”). WHEREAS, the Contractor has been maintaining the Streets, however, upon achievement of Project completion by the Contractor, RCTC must grant relief of maintenance for the Streets to the Contractor. WHEREAS, as the City is the Party better suited to maintain streets within the City, the purpose of this Cooperative Agreement is for the City to accept maintenance of the Streets, prior to transfer of title for each portion thereof to the City, subject to reimbursement by RCTC for the City’s costs thereof. 14 17336.02100\30224563. 4 2 WHEREAS, the Parties recognize that, since the Streets are newly constructed, the anticipated maintenance costs should be minimal. WHEREAS, the Parties agree that upon transfer of title for any portion of the Streets, RCTC’s obligations related to such portion shall terminate, and City shall accept full responsibility for operation, maintenance, repair and liability for such transferred portion of the Streets. NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, it is mutually understood and agreed by RCTC and the City as follows: TERMS 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Cooperative Agreement by reference as though fully set forth herein. 2. Term. 2.1 This Cooperative Agreement shall be effective as of the date first set forth above, and shall continue in effect until (i) title to all portions of the Streets, as identified in Exhibit “A”, has been transferred to the City, (ii) the City has accepted title to all portions of the Streets, and (iii) RCTC has paid all outstanding reimbursements under this Cooperative Agreement to the City. 2.2 Except as expressly set forth herein, the terms and conditions of this Cooperative Agreement shall have no further force or effect as relates to any portion(s) of the Streets for which title has been transferred to and accepted by the City. As of the date of such acceptance, the City shall be fully liable and responsible, at its sole cost and expense, for such portion(s) of the Streets. As of such date, the term “Streets”, as defined herein, shall refer only to the remaining portion(s) of the Streets for which title has not been transferred to and accepted by the City. 3. Obligations of RCTC. 3.1 Except as otherwise specified herein, RCTC shall pay the City’s actual and reasonable costs of maintenance and repair of the Streets. RCTC shall deposit the sum of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) with the City for the work described in Section 4.1 below (the “Deposit”). The total reimbursement to be provided by RCTC under this Cooperative Agreement shall not exceed the Deposit, unless authorized in writing by RCTC’s Executive Director. The City shall notify RCTC in advance of any anticipated costs that, cumulatively, will exceed the Deposit. If RCTC agrees with the basis for the increased costs, the Parties shall execute an amendment to this Cooperative Agreement to increase the amount of the Deposit. 15 17336.02100\30224563. 4 3 4. Obligations of the City 4.1 The City shall be responsible for maintenance and repair of the following portions of the Streets: sidewalk, curb, gutter, streetlights, signs, water valve covers located in streets, pull boxes, striping, pavement markings and asphalt concrete pavement (the “Maintenance Components”). The Parties understand, acknowledge and agree that the Maintenance Components expressly exclude any portion of the landscaping and irrigation system, which shall remain the responsibility of RCTC and their contractor(s) for the contractually required three year plant establishment period provided for in the following contract: State Route 91 Corridor Improvement Project, Contact No. 12-31-113-00 with Atkinson/Walsh, a joint venture (“Contractor Landscape Obligations”). The City shall conduct all usual and normal maintenance and repair activities on the Maintenance Components in order to maintain the Streets in good and safe condition and repair. The City shall comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws including, without limitation, the California Labor Code, in conducting its work on the Maintenance Components. 4.2 The City shall complete its work on the Maintenance Components in a timely and cost effective manner, so as to avoid adverse effects to the public and to minimize damage and needed repair to the Streets. The City shall ensure that its work on the Maintenance Components is of good quality, consistent with the work performed by or on behalf of the City on similar streets. 4.3 The City shall regularly provide invoices to RCTC as costs are incurred for the Maintenance Components and paid for using the Deposit. The invoices shall indicate costs incurred and the amount of the Deposit remaining. Invoices shall be in a form approved by RCTC, and shall include such documentation as required by RCTC. The City shall notify RCTC in advance of any anticipated costs that, cumulatively, will exceed the Deposit, and acknowledges that RCTC will not pay such costs except as agreed upon pursuant to Section 3.1 above. 4.4 The City shall obtain RCTC’s prior written approval for any utility work proposed to be conducted by the City or any third party on or within the Streets, or any portion(s) thereof, which will require cutting or trenching of the Streets, or which may, in any way, compromise the structural integrity of the Streets or any portion(s) thereof. If the City desires to permit such work, the City shall accept full responsibility for operation, maintenance, repair and liability for such portion(s) of the Streets. 4.5 The City shall be responsible, at its sole cost and expense, and without reimbursement from RCTC, for costs incurred as a result of the City’s failure to comply with its obligations under this Cooperative Agreement. 4.6 If the City engages contractor(s) to complete its work on the Maintenance Components, the City shall include, in its contract with such contractor(s), a requirement that the contractor(s) include RCTC, its members, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds and as indemnified parties under said contract. Insurance and indemnification shall, as applicable, be in the same amounts and with the same provisions as provided for the benefit of the City. 4.7 The City shall provide RCTC no less than seventy two (72) hours notice prior to conducting any of its work on the Maintenance Components, and shall allow RCTC staff to perform observation of such work. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of an emergency, 16 17336.02100\30224563. 4 4 the City shall provide as much prior notice to RCTC as possible, unless immediate action is necessary. In such case, the City shall notify RCTC of the work completed the first business day after the incident. 4.8 In any case where the City may seek recovery of repair or maintenance costs from third parties, unless otherwise agreed upon by the Parties, the City shall seek such recovery, and, after reimbursing its own costs related to cost recovery, shall reimburse any and all funds received from RCTC for the exact same repair and maintenance work. 4.9 Upon transfer of title to any portion(s) of the Streets and acceptance thereof by the City, the City shall accept all liability, maintenance and repair obligations for such portion(s) of the Streets, and, as further set forth above, the provisions of this Cooperative Agreement shall terminate as relates to such portion(s). The City shall not unreasonably withhold or delay acceptance of title to any portion of the Streets. Notwithstanding anything else to the contrary herein, to the extent that any Contractor Landscape Obligations remain on any portion(s) of the Streets, they shall remain the responsibility of RCTC and its contractor(s), and RCTC shall not unreasonably reduce or terminate any such Contractor Landscape Obligations. 5. Dispute Resolution. Unless otherwise specified herein, the Parties shall submit any unresolved dispute to RCTC’s Executive Director and the City Manager for negotiation. The Executive Director and the City Manager agree to undertake good faith attempts to resolve said dispute, claim, or controversy within ten (10) calendar days after the receipt of written notice from the Party alleging that a dispute, claim or controversy exists. The Parties additionally agree to cooperate with the other Party in scheduling negotiation sessions. However, if said matter is not resolved within thirty (30) calendar days after conducting the first negotiating session, either Party may, but is not required to, request that the matter be submitted to further dispute resolution procedures, as may be agreed upon by the Parties. 6. Legal Action. If a matter is not resolved within thirty (30) calendar days after the first negotiating session between the Executive Director and the City Manager, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing by the Parties, either Party may proceed with any other remedy available in law or in equity. 7. Indemnification. 7.1 RCTC shall indemnify, defend and hold the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants and contractors free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any negligent acts, omissions or breach of law, or willful misconduct of RCTC, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants or contractors in the performance of RCTC’s obligations under this Cooperative Agreement, including the payment of all reasonable attorneys fees. 7.2 The City shall indemnify, defend and hold RCTC, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants and contractors free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liabilities, losses, damages or injuries, in law or in equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident 17 17336.02100\30224563. 4 5 to any negligent acts, omissions or breach of law, or willful misconduct of the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, consultants or contractors in the performance of the City’s obligations under this Cooperative Agreement, including the payment of all reasonable attorneys fees. 7.3 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Cooperative Agreement, the indemnification provisions set forth in this Section 7 shall survive any expiration or termination of this Cooperative Agreement including, but not limited to, any termination of this Cooperative Agreement as relates to any portion(s) of the Streets for which title has been transferred to and accepted by the City. 8. Notices. All notices, requests, demands and other communications required or permitted to be given under this Cooperative Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or shall be delivered in writing by certified or registered first class mail, postage prepaid, deposited in the United States mail, and properly addressed to the Party at its address set forth below, or at any other address that such Party may designate by written notice to the other Party: RCTC: Riverside County Transportation Commission 4080 Lemon Street, 3rd Floor Riverside, CA 92501 Attn: _________________ CITY: City of Corona 400 S. Vicentia Avenue Corona, CA 92882 Attn: Nelson D. Nelson 9. Force majeure. The failure of performance by either Party (except for payment obligations) hereunder shall not be deemed to be a default where delays or defaults are due to war; insurrection; strikes; lock-outs; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires; casualties; acts of God; acts of the public enemy; epidemics; quarantine restrictions; freight embargoes; lack of transportation; governmental restrictions; unusually severe weather; inability to secure necessary labor, materials or tools; delays of any contractor, subcontractor, railroad, or suppliers; acts of the other Party; acts or failure to act of any other public or governmental agency or entity (other than that acts or failure to act of the Parties); or any other causes beyond the control or without the fault of the Party claiming an extension of time to perform or relief from default. An extension of time for any such cause shall be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if notice by the Party claiming such extension is sent to the other party within ten (10) days of the commencement of the cause. Times of performance under this Cooperative Agreement may also be extended in writing by mutual agreement between the Parties. 10. Amendments. This Cooperative Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the Parties by an instrument in writing. 18 17336.02100\30224563. 4 6 11. Assignment of Cooperative Agreement. Neither Party may assign or transfer its respective rights or obligations under this Cooperative Agreement without the express written consent of the other Party. Any purported assignment or transfer by one Party without the express written consent of the other Party shall be null and void and of no force or effect. 12. Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non-defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. No consent or approval of either Party shall be deemed to waive or render unnecessary such Party’s consent to or approval of any subsequent act of the other Party. Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Cooperative Agreement. 13. Severability. In the event that any one or more of the phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Cooperative Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable by valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Cooperative Agreement, which shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder. 14. Survival. All rights and obligations hereunder that by their nature are to continue after any expiration or termination of this Cooperative Agreement, shall survive any such expiration or termination. 15. Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no third-party beneficiaries to this Cooperative Agreement. 16. Incorporation of Exhibits. The attached Exhibit “A” is incorporated into this Cooperative Agreement. 17. Entire Agreement. This Cooperative Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements or understandings. [Signatures on following page] 19 17336.02100\30224563. 4 7 SIGNATURE PAGE TO COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF CORONA FOR MAINTENANCE OF NEW STREETS PRIOR TO TRANSFER OF TITLE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Cooperative Agreement on the date first herein above written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY CITY OF CORONA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: By:_____________________________ Signature Its: ___________________________ _____________________________ Name _____________________________ Title ATTEST: By: ____________________________ City Clerk Approved as to Form: Approved as to Form: By: ____________________________ By: ______________________________ Best Best & Krieger LLP Dean Derleth General Counsel City Attorney 20 CA\DD\16000.10201\10188427.3 Exhibit A 17336.02100\30224563.4 EXHIBIT “A” DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTION OF STREETS Exhibits “A-1” (one page) and “A-2” (one page) are attached behind this page and are further described as follows: Exhibit A-1 Exhibit A-1 depicts the newly constructed portion of Second Street. The areas of Second Street which are subject to this Cooperative Agreement are identified in purple, blue and yellow. The portions of Second Street identified in purple are subject to a pending eminent domain action. The portions of Second Street identified in yellow are owned in fee by RCTC, and are currently pending transfer of title to the City. The portion of Second Street identified in blue is pending transfer of title by Caltrans. Exhibit A-2 Exhibit A-2 depicts the newly constructed portion of Bollero Place. The areas of Bollero Place which are subject to this Cooperative Agreement are identified in blue and yellow. The portions of Bollero Place identified in yellow are owned in fee by RCTC, and are currently pending transfer of title to the City. The portion of Bollero Place identified in blue is pending transfer of title by Caltrans. 21 22 23 AGENDA ITEM 10 Agenda Item 10  RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION  DATE: November 27, 2017  TO: Western Riverside County Programs and Projects Committee  FROM: Patricia Castillo, Capital Projects Manager  THROUGH: Marlin Feenstra, Project Delivery Director  SUBJECT: Construction Agreement with Dalke & Sons Construction Inc. for the Perris  Valley Line Platform Canopies      STAFF RECOMMENDATION:    This item is for the Committee to:    1) Award Agreement No. 18‐33‐051‐00 to Dalke & Sons Construction Inc. (Dalke), as the  lowest responsive, responsible bidder, for the construction of the Perris Valley Line (PVL)  Platform Canopy project (Project) in the amount of $2,078,391, plus a contingency  amount of $311,759, for a total amount not to exceed $2,390,150;   2) Authorize the Chair or Executive Director, pursuant to legal counsel review, to execute  the agreement on behalf of the Commission;  3) Authorize the Executive Director, or designee, to approve contingency work pursuant to  the agreement terms up to the total amount;   4) Authorize the payment of pass‐through costs for flagging services in an amount not to  exceed $475,000;   5) Approve an increase to the FY 2017/18 budget of $434,000 for flagging expenditures; and  6) Forward to the Commission for final action.    BACKGROUND INFORMATION:    The PVL, a 24‐mile extension of the 91 Line Metrolink service commenced operations on June 6,  2016.  The PVL project included four new stations – Riverside‐Hunter Park, Moreno Valley/March  Field, Perris‐Downtown and Perris‐South.     During the planning of the PVL, platform canopies and a second track were considered and  included in the 30 percent design plans.  After multiple value engineering workshops, the decision  was made to delete the canopies due to cost constraints.  However, the infrastructure for canopy  installation was provided.  After the completion of the PVL project, grant funds were identified  and the PVL canopy plan sheets were repackaged as an independent project.     The Project will install seven canopy installations initially planned for the PVL project.       24 Agenda Item 10  Procurement Process    On October 5, 2017, the Commission advertised Invitation for Bids (IFB) No. 18‐33‐051‐00 for  construction of the Project.  A public notice was advertised in the Press Enterprise, and the  complete IFB, including all contract documents, was posted on the Commission’s PlanetBids  website, which is accessible through the Commission’s website.  Electronic mail messages were  sent to vendors registered in the Commission’s PlanetBids database that fit the IFB qualifications.   Forty‐six firms downloaded the IFB.  Thirteen are located in Riverside County.  A pre‐bid  conference was held at the Commission’s office on October 12, and on November 7, four bids  were received and publicly opened.  A summary of the bids received is shown in Table A.    Table A  Construction of Riverside Downtown Commuter Rail Station Improvements  Bid Summary   Firm  (In order from low bid to high bid) Bid Amount   Engineer’s Estimate $1,930,542  1 Dalke $2,078,391  2 Braughton Construction $2,147,325  3 Metro Builders & Engineers, Ltd $2,268,238  4 Hal Hayes  $2,359,000    The basis for award for a public works contract is the lowest responsive and responsible bidder  as defined by the Commission’s procurement policy and state law.  The bid analysis attached  shows the bid amounts of the four bidders and shows the bid unit price, amount, and percent  variation from the engineer’s estimate for each bid item.    After analyzing the bids, staff and Bechtel Infrastructure, Inc., the Commission’s program  management firm, concluded that Dalke’s bid in the amount of $2,078,391, is the lowest  responsive and responsible bid received for the Project. Dalke is a business located in Riverside.    Although the lowest responsible bid is higher than the engineer’s estimate, the bids were  analyzed for any irregularities or omissions.  It was determined the higher cost was spread  throughout most of the bid items and therefore is not likely due to any issues with the bid  documents, but simply reflective of the upward pressure that has been observed on bid prices in  general.     Typically, a rate of 10 percent is used to determine project contingency.  Staff is recommending  a contingency amount of 15 percent of the total Project amount, or $311,759.  Since a portion of  the construction will take place in a fully operational Metrolink station, safety, operational  continuity, and customer convenience is of utmost importance.  Staff worked to minimize risks  of customer interference by clearly defining the scope and ensuring the plan set is complete and  thoroughly reviewed for constructability; however, if complications arise and the contingency is  25 Agenda Item 10  not adequate, such contractual budget issues may delay the Project and prevent work from being  completed in a timely manner.  Furthermore, smaller construction contracts such as this one  often require a contingency greater than 10 percent because of changes common to many  projects, such as maintaining traffic or overhead charges.    Staff recommends award of Agreement No. 18‐33‐051‐00 for the construction of the Project to  Dalke in the amount of $2,078,391, plus a contingency amount of $311,759 to fund potential  change orders and supplemental work, for a total amount not to exceed $2,390,150.    Approval of additional funds in the amount of $475,000 is needed for railroad flagging services  to be provided by Southern California Regional Rail Authority.  Staff recommends that the cost  for these services be paid by the contractor and reimbursed by the Commission as a pass‐through  cost with no mark‐up of SCRRA costs allowed.    The funding for this Project is comprised of Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5307  grant funds of approximately $2.5 million and 2009 Measure A Western County rail funds of  $365,150.  Staff will use the federal grant funds to the maximum extent possible.  The FY 2017/18  budget includes $2,272,000 for construction and $41,000 for flagging services.  Staff recommends  that the Commission approve a budget adjustment of $434,000 to increase professional services  for flagging.       Financial Information  In Fiscal Year Budget:  Yes  No  N/A  Year:  FY 2017/18  FY 2017/18  FY 2018/19  Amount:  $2,313,000  $   434,000  $   118,150  Source of Funds: FTA Section 5307 Grant and 2009  Measure A Western County Rail funds Budget Adjustment:  No  Yes (flagging)   N/A  GL/Project Accounting No.: 004025 81301 265 33 81301 $2,390,150  004025 65520 265 33 65520 $475,000  Fiscal Procedures Approved: Date: 11/15/2017    Attachments:  1) Draft Agreement No. 18‐33‐051‐00  2) RCTC Bid Analysis  26 Contract-1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ************** CONTRACT ************** PASSENGER AMENITIES – CONSTRUCTION OF COMMUTER RAIL STATION CANOPIES AND WIND SCREENS RCTC Agreement No. 18-33-051-00 October 5, 2017 BETWEEN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION AND DALKE & SONS CONSTRUCTION, INC. 27 ATTACHMENT 1 Contract-2 PASSENGER AMENITIES – CONSTRUCTION OF COMMUTER RAIL STATION CANOPIES AND WIND SCREENS RCTC AGREEMENT NO. 18-33-051-00 1. PARTIES AND DATE. This Contract is made and entered into this ____ day of ____________, 2017 by and between the Riverside County Transportation Commission (hereinafter called the "Commission") and Dalke & Sons Construction, Inc. (hereinafter called the "Contractor"). This Contract is for that Work described in the Contract Documents entitled PASSENGER AMENITIES – CONSTRUCTION OF COMMUTER RAIL STATION CANOPIES AND WIND SCREENS 2. RECITALS. 2.1 The Commission is a County Transportation Commission organized under the provisions of Sections 130000, et seq. of the Public Utilities Code of the State of California, with power to contract for services necessary to achieving its purpose; 2.2 Contractor, in response to a Notice Inviting Bids issued by Commission on October 5, 2017, has submitted a bid proposal PASSENGER AMENITIES – CONSTRUCTION OF COMMUTER RAIL STATION CANOPIES AND WIND SCREENS 2.3 Commission has duly opened and considered the Contractor's bid proposal and duly awarded the bid to Contractor in accordance with the Notice Inviting Bids and other Bid Documents. 2.4 Contractor has obtained, and delivers concurrently herewith, Performance and Payment Bonds and evidences of insurance coverage as required by the Contract Documents. 3. TERMS. 3.1 Incorporation of Documents. This Contract includes and hereby incorporates in full by reference this Contract and the following Contract Documents provided with the above referenced Notice Inviting Bids, including all exhibits, drawings, specifications and documents therein, and attachments thereto, all of which, including all addendum thereto, are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part of this Contract: a. NOTICE INVITING BIDS b. INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS c. CONTRACT BID FORMS d. FORM OF CONTRACT e. PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BOND FORMS f. ESCROW AGREEMENT FOR SECURITY DEPOSITS g. CONTRACT APPENDIX PART "A" - Regulatory Requirements and Permits 28 Contract-3 PART "B" – General Conditions PART "C" – Special Provisions (under separate cover) PART "D" - Contract Plans (under separate cover) PART "E" - DBE Requirements PART "F" - Federal Davis-Bacon Wage Determination PART "G" - Federal Transit Administration Requirements for Federal Aid Construction Contracts h. ADDENDUM NO.(S) 1, 2 & 3 3.2 Contractor's Basic Obligation. Contractor promises and agrees, at his own cost and expense, to furnish to the Commission all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work for the construction of the passenger amenities including canopies and wind screens the Riverside Commuter Rail Stations. Notwithstanding anything else in the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall complete the Work for a total of Two Million Seventy-Eight Thousand Three Hundred Ninety-One Dollars ($2,078,391), as specified in the bid proposal and pricing schedules submitted by the Contractor in response to the above referenced Notice Inviting Bids. Such amount shall be subject to adjustment in accordance with the applicable terms of this Contract. All Work shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with the above referenced Contract Documents. 3.3 Period of Performance. Contractor shall perform and complete all Work under this Contract (excluding plant establishment work) within 140 working days of the effective date of the Notice to Proceed, and in accordance with any completion schedule developed pursuant to provisions of the Contract Documents. Contractor agrees that if such Work is not completed within the aforementioned periods, liquidated damages will apply as provided by the applicable provisions of the Special Provisions, found in Part "B" of the Contract Appendix. The amount of liquidated damages shall equal seven hundred dollars ($700.00) for each day or fraction thereof, it takes to complete the Work, or specified portion(s) of the Work, over and above the number of days specified herein or beyond the Project Milestones established by approved Construction Schedules. 3.4 Commission's Basic Obligation. Commission agrees to engage and does hereby engage Contractor as an independent contractor to furnish all materials and to perform all Work according to the terms and conditions herein contained for the sum set forth above. Except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents, the Commission shall pay to Contractor, as full consideration for the satisfactory performance by the Contractor of services and obligation required by this Contract, the above referenced compensation in accordance with Compensation Provisions set forth in the Contract Documents. 29 Contract-4 3.5 Contractor's Labor Certification. (1) Contractor maintains that he is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Work. A certification form for this purpose is attached to this Contract as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference, and shall be executed simultaneously with this Contract. 3.6 Successors. The parties do for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns agree to the full performance of all of the provisions contained in this Contract. Contractor may not either voluntarily or by action of law, assign any obligation assumed by Contractor hereunder without the prior written consent of Commission. 3.7 Notices. All notices hereunder and communications regarding interpretation of the terms of the Contract or changes thereto shall be provided by the mailing thereof by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid and addressed as follows: Contractor: Commission: Dalke & Sons Construction, Inc. Riverside County Transportation Commission 4585 Allstate Drive P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92501 Riverside, California 92502-2208 Attn: Barry Dalke Attn: Executive Director Any notice so given shall be considered received by the other party three (3) days after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid, addressed to the party at the above address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service. CONTRACTOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY (Contractor Name) TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION By: ______________________ By: _________________________ Name Anne Mayer Riverside County Transportation Commission ______________________ Title Tax I.D. Number: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: _________________________ Best Best & Krieger LLP Counsel, RCTC 30   EXHIBIT “A” CERTIFICATION LABOR CODE - SECTION 1861 I, the undersigned Contractor, am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 et seq. of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of the Code. I agree to and will comply with such provisions before commencing the Work governed by this Contract. CONTRACTOR: Name of Contractor: Dalke & Sons Construction, Inc. By: _______________________________ Signature _______________________________ Name _______________________________ Title _______________________________ Date 31 17541 BIDDER'S NAME AND ADDRESS BID $ BID RANK 1.Dalke & Sons Construction, Inc. 4585 Allstate Drive Riverside, CA 92501 2.Braughton Construction, Inc. 10722 Arrow Route STE 810 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91738 3.Metro Builders & Engineers, Ltd. 2610 Avon St Newport Beach, CA 92663 4.Hal Hays Construction, Inc. 4181 Latham St. Riverside, CA 92501 $1,930,542.00 Subcontractors of Dalke & Sons Construction Rose Constructing Combs Plumbing Bithell, Inc. KCB Towers McKernan, Inc. Hydrotech Electric RB Sheet Metal Concrete Plumbing Painting FOB Galzing (Structural Steel) Glazing Electrical Sheet Metal & Metal Roof Rancho Cucamonga Mentone Engineer's Estimate (EE): COMMENTS $2,359,000.00 4 13.5%> low bid low bid City Work $2,078,391.00 1 > low bid3.3% 9.1%> low bid 2 3 $2,147,325.00 $2,268,238.00 RCTC Agreement No. 17-33-058-00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISION BID OPENING 2:00 PM, Tuesday, November 7, 2017 PERRIS VALLEY LINE PLATFORM CANOPIES PROJECT Corona Nuevo Covina Highland Redlands 32 ATTACHMENT 2 Patti CastilloPERRIS VALLEY LINE CANOPIES " RIVERSIDE HUNTER PARK STATION 10,1inTOVIAT RIYERVIDE RIVERSIDE Jkbzrn6t9hil" , t c 1Id W 3: z-rr.Ire a Orr.' MORENO VALLEY/ �� MARCH FIELD STATION ��y��7 iJJ[:U: krL MORENO VALLEY a MARCH AIR SESOVE BASE P,- I.-u-aur PERRIS grugr,����e. _ 81e f&brie!:} ue .0 $r DOWNTOWN PERRIS STATION irwrip Nd. e 311 Placrn J.e SOUTH PERRIS STATION &raw Rd. N Questions?