Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout09.5) General Plan - Attachment P - Summary of Differences between Ex and Proposed GPCity of Temple City Attachment P Summary of Differences between the Existing and Draft General Plan On June 19, 2017, the Draft Mid-Century General Plan and the Crossroads Specific Plan were released to the public for review and comment. The table below summarizes the major changes between the existing and the Draft General Plan. TABLE 1: SUMMARY TAB LE Variable Existing General Plan Proposed General Plan Amount and Location of Growth1 Buildout2 of the Plan = Population of 37,818. Residential growth was focused on multi-family areas. Commercial growth was focused on the Downtown Buildout2 of the Plan = Population of 43,279 Residential growth is focused to existing multi- family areas and the Crossroads Specific Plan. Commercial growth is focused to the Crossroads Specific Plan, Rosemead Blvd., and Las Tunas Drive. Mobility Efforts & Initiatives Considers adoption of the 1986 Las Tunas Drive Revitalization Plan, review of parking standards, reducing residential cut through traffic, and coordination of traffic signals. Includes strategies to reduce vehicle trips, make trips shorter, and make alternatives to driving more feasible. The Implementation Program calls for creating and periodically updating the following: a Transportation Demand Management Program, an Integrated Transportation Plan, Neighborhood Parking Management, an Active Transportation Plan, and Safe Routes to Schools Plans. Mitigating Impact of Growth on Public Services Not addressed Policy LU 1.7 (page 2-14) requires new development to contribute its share of the costs of providing necessary public services through equitable fees and exactions. The EIR relies on the adoption of impact fees to mitigate the impact of future development. Protection of Mature Trees Not addressed Policy NR 5.2 (page 6-7) encourages onsite preservation of mature and native trees in good health. December 5, 2017 City Council Meeting Mid-Century General Plan and Crossroads Specific Plan Page 2 of 2 Variable Existing General Plan Proposed General Plan Environmental Sustainability Limited to water efficiency, receiving reports on the groundwater, and supporting the South Coast Air Quality Management District Includes an array of policies covering: air quality, climate change, the urban forest, native plants, water resources, and storm water. See policies LU 7.1-7.8, page 2-23, and the Natural Resources Element. The Implementation Program calls for: updating the Building Code, developing a Climate Action Plan, and creating an Urban Forest Master Plan, in addition to other documents or programs that will touch on improvements to environmental sustainability. Historic Preservation The Resource Management Element states that there are no designated landmarks and that the City has not performed a survey of eligible resources The Land Use Element has policies focusing future programs on education, developing incentives for historic preservation, and voluntary designation of eligible landmarks. See policies LU 5.1-5.7 page 2- 20. CEQA provides the City little flexibility in dealing with historic resources. The EIR will require applicants seeking to demolish a structure more than 50 years in age to submit a letter from a historian on whether the demolition requires additional study. Alternatively, the City can proactively perform a citywide historic resource survey, which would help narrow down which structures in the City would require additional study. High Density Residential Sets the maximum density at 30 dwelling units per acre and minimum density at 20 dwelling units per acre Proposes to adjust the maximum density to 36 units per acre. This will assist in helping the City meet its regional housing need without adding units to single family areas. It will also help the City make a strong case to the State to remove the minimum density requirements when the Housing Element is next updated. 1 The California Department of Finance estimates that on January 1, 2017 the City’s population was 36,389 2 General Plans typically provide a 10 to 20-year population forecast. A buildout year is not typically set since the plans should be amended every decade, which would be well before buildout of the plan. At the current rate of population growth, it would take approximately 35 years (2050) to reach buildout of the General Plan.