Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
04.18.2023 City Council Meeting Packet
Posted 4/14/2023 Page 1 of 2 AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 18, 2023 7:00 P.M. Medina City Hall 2052 County Road 24 I.CALL TO ORDER II.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III.MOTION TO DELEGATE DUTIES TO PRESIDE OVER THE MEETING TO COUNCIL MEMBER ALBERS A.Approve Grounds Service Agreement with the Hamel Athletic Club for the 2023 Baseball Season B.Approve Concession Service Agreement with the Hamel Athletic Club for the 2023 Baseball Season A.Pinto Drive (South of Hamel Road) Improvement Project – Public Hearing and Assessment Hearing 1.Resolution Approving Plans According to Feasibility Report and Ordering Pinto Drive Improvement Project IV.ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA V.APPROVAL OF MINUTES A.Minutes of the April 4, 2023, Regular City Council Meeting B.Minutes of the April 5, 2023 Board of Appeal and Equalization Meeting VI.CONSENT AGENDA VII.COMMENTS A.From Citizens on Items Not on th e Agenda B.Park Commission C.Planning Commission VIII.PRESENTATION A.County Commissioner Kevin Anderson IX.NEW BUSINESS 2.Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll for Pinto Drive Overlay ProjectB. Cheyenne Trail Improvement Project – Public Hearing and Assessment Hearing 1.Resolution Approving Plans According to Feasibility Report and Ordering Cheyenne Trail Improvement Project 2.Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll for Cheyenne Trail Overlay Project C.Meadowwoods Trail Improvement Project – Public Hearing and Assessment Hearing 1.Resolution Approving Plans According to Feasibility Report and Ordering Meadowwoods Trail Improvement Project 2.Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll for Meadowwoods Trail Overlay Project D.Foxberry Farms Improvement Project – Public Hearing and Assessment Hearing 1.Resolution Approving Plans According to Feasibility Report and Ordering Foxberry Farms Improvement Project 2.Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll for Foxberry Farms Overlay Project E.Medina Highlands and Clydesdale Trail East Improvement Project – Public Hearing and Assessment Hearing 1.Resolution Approving Plans According to Feasibility Report and Ordering Medina Highlands Improvement Project 2.Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll for Medina Highlands Overlay Project F.Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project - Public Hearing and Assessment Hearing 1.Resolution Adopting Assessment Roll for the 2023 Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project 2.Resolution Accepting Bids and Awarding the Contract Meeting Rules of Conduct to Address the City Council: •Fill out & turn in comment card •Give name and address •Indicate if representing a group •Limit remarks to 3-5 minutes Mayor Kathleen Martin will participate in the meeting virtually from Kenwood Inn & Spa, 10400 Sonoma Highway Kenwood, CA 95452 Posted 4/14/2023 Page 2 of 2 Page 2 of 2 G. Cates Industrial Park Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review H. Medina Venture – Meander Park/Boardwalk – Final Plat – Public Hearing 1. Ordinance Establishing a Planned Unit Development District for “Meander Park and Boardwalk” and Amending the Official Zoning Map 2. Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance by Title and Summary 3. Wetland Replacement Plan 4. Resolution Granting Final Plat Approval for Meander Park and Boardwalk 5. Ordinance Establishing the Meander Pak and Boardwalk North Storm Sewer Improvement District 6. Resolution Authorizing Publication of Ordinance by Title and Summary 7. Planned Unit Development Agreement X. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT XI. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS XII. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS XIII. ADJOURN MEMORANDUM TO: Medina Mayor and City Council FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator DATE OF REPORT: April 13, 2023 DATE OF MEETING: April 18, 2023 SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report VI. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Grounds Service Agreement with the Hamel Athletic Club for the 2023 Baseball Season – Staff worked with HAC to update the contract to reflect the actual costs associated with baseball usage and address other concerns. Staff recommends approval. See attached memo and agreement. B. Approve Concession Service Agreement with the Hamel Athletic Club for the 2023 Baseball Season – The agreement has been updated to reflect the current year/season for concessions. Staff recommends approval. See attached agreement. VIII. PRESENTATION A. County Commissioner Kevin Anderson – Commissioner Kevin Anderson has requested time on the agenda to provide an update to the City Council and discuss Hennepin County projects that impact Medina. IX. NEW BUSINESS A. Pinto Drive (South of Hamel Road) Improvement Project – Public Hearing and Assessment Hearing – At the February 21, 2023, meeting, the City Council received the feasibility report and called for the public hearings for the Pinto Drive Improvement Project and levying special assessments. The hearings have been noticed for the April 18, 2023, City Council meeting. Recommended Motions: 1. Motion to adopt resolution approving plans according to feasibility report and ordering Pinto Drive Improvement Project 2. Motion to adopt resolution adopting assessment roll for Pinto Drive Improvement Project B. Cheyenne Trail Improvement Project – Public Hearing and Assessment Hearing – At the February 21, 2023, meeting, the City Council received the feasibility report and called for the public hearings for the Cheyenne Trail Improvement Project and levying special 2 assessments. The hearings have been noticed for the April 18, 2023, City Council meeting. Recommended Motions: 1. Motion to adopt resolution approving plans according to feasibility report and ordering Cheyenne Trail Improvement Project 2. Motion to adopt resolution adopting assessment roll for Cheyenne Trail Improvement Project C. Meadowwoods Trail Improvement Project – Public Hearing and Assessment Hearing – At the February 21, 2023, meeting, the City Council received the feasibility report and called for the public hearings for the Meadowwoods Trail Improvement Project and levying special assessments. The hearings have been noticed for the April 18, 2023, City Council meeting. Recommended Motions: 1. Motion to adopt resolution approving plans according to feasibility report and ordering Meadowwoods Trail Improvement Project 2. Motion to adopt resolution adopting assessment roll for Meadowwoods Trail Improvement Project D. Foxberry Farms Improvement Project – Public Hearing and Assessment Hearing – At the February 21, 2023, meeting, the City Council received the feasibility report and called for the public hearings for the Foxberry Farms Improvement Project and levying special assessments. The hearings have been noticed for the April 18, 2023, City Council meeting. Recommended Motions: 1. Motion to adopt resolution approving plans according to feasibility report and ordering Foxberry Farms Improvement Project 2. Motion to adopt resolution adopting assessment roll for Foxberry Farms Improvement Project E. Medina Highlands and Clydesdale Trail East Improvement Project – Public Hearing and Assessment Hearing – At the February 21, 2023, meeting, the City Council received the feasibility report and called for the public hearings for the Medina Highlands and Clydesdale Trail East Improvement Project and levying special assessments. The hearings have been noticed for the April 18, 2023, City Council meeting. Recommended Motions: 1. Motion to adopt resolution approving plans according to feasibility report and ordering Medina Highlands Improvement Project 2. Motion to adopt resolution adopting assessment roll for Medina Highlands Improvement Project 3 F. Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Public Hearing and Assessment Hearing – At the February 21, 2023, meeting, the City Council adopted a resolution ordering the project, approving plans and specifications, and authorizing the advertisement for bids. Recommended Motions: 1. Motion to adopt resolution adopting assessment roll for Clydesdale Trail Rehabilitation Improvement Project 2. Motion to adopt resolution accepting the lowest responsible bid and awarding the contract to GMH Asphalt Corporation in the amount of $337,625.81 G. Cates Industrial Park Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review – Oppidan Investments has requested land use approvals for development of approximately 310,000 square feet of warehouse/light industrial/office buildings on approximately 30 acres east of Willow Drive, north of Chippewa Road. The following applications have been submitted for review:1) Rezoning to Business (B) zoning district 2) Preliminary Plat to subdivide subject site into two lots and 3) Site Plan Review for proposed construction. Potential Action: Staff would recommend consideration of the rezoning first, since the site plan review is designed assuming a B zoning. If the City Council supports the rezoning to the B district, the following action could be taken: Motion to direct staff to prepare the documents approving the rezoning of the property to the Business zoning district and granting preliminary plat and site plan review approval subject to the conditions noted in the staff report [and with additional changes noted by Council]. H. Medina Venture – Meander Park/Boardwalk – Final Plat – Public Hearing – On January 17, 2023, the Medina City Council granted conditional approval of a preliminary plat and rezoning ordinance for the Meander Park and Boardwalk Planned Unit Development and general plan. The applicant has requested final plat approval. During preparation of final plans, a discrepancy of 0.9 feet was found in the location of the subject property’s eastern property line. The surveyor found the eastern property line to be 0.9’ further to the west than shown on preliminary plans. The applicant has requested to construct the improvements in the same location as conditionally approved, despite the fact the eastern property line is one foot closer than assumed. The PUD Ordinance has technically not become effective at this time. One of the provisions of the ordinance was that it would not take effect until after final approval of Meander Park and Boardwalk. Staff is requesting City Council review and discussion. 4 Potential Actions: Staff recommends that the City Council first make a determination on the proposed adjustment to the PUD to allow improvements to be constructed as originally proposed despite the eastern property line being one-foot further west than assumed. The Council should hold a hearing on the PUD and on the establishment of the Stormsewer Improvement Tax District before considering any action. If the Council wants to require the original setbacks, an additional condition would need to be added to the final plat resolution to require the plans to be updated to shift the improvements. If the Council supports adjusting the PUD approval, the following actions could be taken: 1) Motion to adopt the ordinance establishing a PUD district for “Meander Park and Boardwalk” and amending the official zoning map 2) Motion to adopt the resolution authorizing publication by title and summary 3) Motion to approve the wetland replacement plan for Meander Park and Boardwalk 4) Motion to adopt the resolution granting final plat approval for Meander Park and Boardwalk 5) Motion to adopt the Ordinance Establishing the Meander Park and Boardwalk North Stormsewer Improvement Tax District 6) Motion to adopt the resolution authorizing publication by title and summary 7) Motion to approve the Planned Unit Development Agreement If the Council does not support adjusting the PUD approval and supports the plans be adjusted to shift improvements to the west to account for the property line location, the following actions could be taken: 1) Motion to approve the wetland replacement plan for Meander Park and Boardwalk 2) Motion to adopt the resolution granting final plat approval for Meander Park and Boardwalk with the following condition added: “The Applicant shall update construction plans to shift the shared driveway and parking lot to the west to provide setback shown upon the PUD General Plan of Development.” 3) Motion to adopt the Ordinance Establishing the Meander Park and Boardwalk North Stormsewer Improvement Tax District 4) Motion to adopt the resolution authorizing publication by title and summary 5) Motion to approve the Planned Unit Development Agreement XII. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, EFT 006789E-006807E for $60,690.54, order check numbers 054199-054249 for $219,042.80, payroll EFT 0512635-0512670 for $67,897.54. INFORMATION PACKET: • Planning Department Update • Police Department Update 5 • Public Works Department Update • Claims List Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 4, 2023 1 DRAFT 1 2 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 4, 2023 3 4 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on April 4, 2023 at 7:00 5 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Martin presided. 6 7 I. ROLL CALL 8 9 Members present: Albers, Cavanaugh (virtual), DesLauriers, and Martin. 10 11 Members absent: Reid. 12 13 Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Clerk Caitlyn Walker, Attorney 14 Dave Anderson, Finance Director Erin Barnhart, City Engineer Jim Stremel, City 15 Planning Director Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and Chief of Police 16 Jason Nelson. 17 18 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:00 p.m.) 19 20 III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:00 p.m.) 21 The agenda was approved as presented. 22 23 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:00 p.m.) 24 25 A. Approval of the March 21, 2023 Work Session City Council Meeting Minutes 26 Martin stated that prior to the meeting Johnson distributed proposed changes to the 27 minutes. 28 29 Moved by Albers, seconded by DesLauriers, to approve the March 21, 2023 work 30 session City Council meeting minutes as amended. 31 32 A roll call vote was performed: 33 34 DesLauriers aye 35 Albers aye 36 Martin aye 37 38 Motion passed unanimously. 39 40 B. Approval of the March 21, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 41 Moved by Albers, seconded by DesLauriers, to approve the March 21, 2023 regular City 42 Council meeting minutes as presented. 43 44 A roll call vote was performed: 45 46 Albers aye 47 DesLauriers aye 48 Martin aye 49 50 Motion passed unanimously. 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 4, 2023 2 1 Anderson asked that Cavanaugh be unmuted as everyone has to be able to see and 2 hear one another for him to participate remotely. 3 4 Martin noted that he is unmuted but there is an issue with the audio on his end. It was 5 agreed upon that the votes should not reflect Cavanaugh until the issue is resolved. 6 7 V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:02 p.m.) 8 9 A. Approve Temporary Liquor License to Wildlife Rehabilitation Center of 10 Minnesota 11 B. Approve Off-Site Gambling Permit for Wayzata Youth Hockey for 12 Celebration Day 13 C. Approve Resolution 2023-38 Authorizing Interfund Loan for Advance of 14 Certain Road Construction Costs 15 D. Approve Resolution 2023-39 Requesting Conveyance of Tax-Forfeited Land 16 E. Approve Notice of Decision for Hackamore Road Wetland Replacement 17 Plan 18 Moved by Albers, seconded by DesLauriers, to approve the consent agenda. 19 20 A roll call vote was performed: 21 22 Albers aye 23 DesLauriers aye 24 Cavanaugh aye 25 Martin aye 26 27 Motion passed unanimously. 28 29 VI. COMMENTS (7:03 p.m.) 30 31 A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 32 There were none. 33 34 B. Planning Commission 35 Finke reported that the Planning Commission will meet the following week to hold 36 hearings to consider an amendment to the Medina Highlands PUD to allow a deck on a 37 twinhome and to consider a one-foot reduction for setbacks in the Medina Park and 38 Boardwalk PUD. He explained that the developer has discovered a one-foot 39 miscalculation in the property line boundaries and therefore the amendment would be 40 necessary. 41 42 C. Park Commission 43 Scherer reported that the Park Commission has not met since the last Council meeting. 44 He provided an update on the work the public works crew has been doing to prepare for 45 spring as well as review of the HAC baseball agreement terms. He stated that the 46 grandstand permit is ready, and that project will move forward this spring once the 47 ground firms up. 48 49 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 4, 2023 3 Martin commented that she had to venture into parts of South Minneapolis and noted 1 numerous potholes and poor snow clearing. She recognized the hard work of public 2 works to keep the roads in good condition and clear of snow. 3 4 VII. PRESENTATIONS (7:08 p.m.) 5 6 A. Resolution 2023-40 Recognizing Derek Reinking for 15 Years of Service 7 Martin read aloud the draft resolution. 8 9 Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to adopt Resolution 2023-40 recognizing 10 Derek Reinking for 15 years of service to the City of Medina. 11 12 A roll call vote was performed: 13 14 Cavanaugh aye 15 DesLauriers aye 16 Albers aye 17 Martin aye 18 19 Motion passed unanimously. 20 21 Martin presented the Resolution 2023-40 to Derek Reinking and thanked him for his 22 service to the City. 23 24 Scherer stated that he and Derek Reinking started their joint venture 15 years ago, when 25 he was supposed to start at 8 a.m. but was called in at 2:30 a.m. because of snow and 26 was happy to do so. He commented that Reinking has stepped into the foreman 27 position and excelled in the position, respected by residents and other staff members 28 alike. He commented that Reinking is a great employee and the City is lucky to have 29 him. 30 31 B. Resolution 2023-41 Recognizing Deb Dion for 15 Years of Service 32 Martin read aloud the draft resolution. 33 34 Moved by Albers, seconded by DesLauriers, to adopt the Resolution 2023-41 35 recognizing Deb Dion for 15 years of service to the City of Medina. 36 37 A roll call vote was performed: 38 39 Cavanaugh aye 40 DesLauriers aye 41 Albers aye 42 Martin aye 43 44 Motion passed unanimously. 45 46 Martin presented Deb Dion with Resolution 2023-41 and thanked her for her service to 47 the City. 48 49 Finke commented that it has been fun to work with Dion over the past 15 years, 50 recognizing the changes that have occurred in the planning department during that time 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 4, 2023 4 to become more efficient. He commented that Dion has a lot of patience when working 1 with contractors and works well collaboratively. He commented that he often hears 2 comments of how people coming into the planning department enjoy working with Dion, 3 noting that she is a great member of the Medina team. 4 5 VIII. NEW BUSINESS 6 7 A. Tom Dykoff – Lot Rearrangement – 552 and 562 Highway 55 (7:19 p.m.) 8 Johnson stated that the applicant is requesting a lot line rearrangement between the two 9 properties which would add a narrow strip of property to the northern lot. 10 11 Finke stated that the request is straightforward and noted that the property at 562 12 recently went through the process of lot combination. He stated that 562 would still fall 13 short of the minimum lot size and generally they would not consider taking land from a 14 property that does not meet the minimum lot size. He stated that this lot rearrangement 15 would increase the size of the two lots and would make the land contiguous within the 16 lots, therefore staff recommends approval. 17 18 DesLauriers stated that he supports the rearrangement but asked if there is a reason 19 this was not done one month ago with the previous request. 20 21 Finke confirmed that could have been done at the same time, but noted there was an 22 issue with timing on the lot combination and related recording at the County. 23 24 1. Resolution 2023-42 Approving Lot Line Rearrangement Between 562 25 and 552 Highway 55 26 Moved by Albers, seconded by DesLauriers, to adopt the Resolution 2023-42 approving 27 a lot line rearrangement between 552 and 562 Highway 55. 28 29 A roll call vote was performed: 30 31 Albers aye 32 DesLauriers aye 33 Cavanaugh aye 34 Martin aye 35 36 Motion passed unanimously. 37 38 B. City of Independence Request for Sewer Units (7:22 p.m.) 39 Johnson provided background on the request from Independence for additional sewer 40 units and the work staff has been doing to determine if there are additional units 41 available. He stated that it has been determined that about 500 feet of sewer pipe 42 needs to be upgraded in the near future. 43 44 Finke stated that the analysis was done in November and additional data has been 45 reviewed to determine the capacity of that 500 feet north of Highway 12. He stated that 46 the ultimate conclusion was that there would be a potential capacity shortage for that 47 500 feet. He stated that Independence has provided information that as a result of the 48 proposed development, the peak flow would not increase, it would just pump more often. 49 He stated that staff recommends that the units can be supported, but the capacity of that 50 pipe should be addressed at the same time as it would be much more cost effective to 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 4, 2023 5 address that in conjunction with the Hennepin County street improvements. He noted 1 that the City Attorney drafted language which would amend the Quad City Agreement to 2 allow for the additional units and manage the upgrade of that pipe. He stated that the 3 estimated cost would be $360,000 which would be split by the units. He also noted a 4 grammatical change suggested for the agreement, changing “its” to “their respective”. 5 6 DesLauriers stated that based on the report it would appear the changes would be in 7 2024. He asked how the additional units in Independence would be impacted if Loretto 8 does not want to sign the updated agreement. 9 10 Finke stated that John Christianson is present from WSB and representatives from 11 Independence are also present. He stated that for the additional units to be approved, 12 each city would need to agree to the change. He stated that if the other cities raised 13 concern with the capacity upgrade and not the units, they would need to consider if part 14 of the amendment could move forward. He noted that the City would continue to chase 15 funding as it has been identified that the upgrade should be made in conjunction with the 16 street improvements. He recognized that Independence has more time sensitivity as 17 they would like to move forward with the development this spring. 18 19 DesLauriers asked if staff has had those discussions with the other cities. 20 21 Finke replied that staff has let Independence take the lead in those conversations. 22 23 Albers commented that it seems like there is grading activity on that site and asked the 24 timing as to when the pipe connection would be necessary to support that development. 25 26 Martin commented that there would be significant savings to coordinate with the road 27 project in 2024 and therefore that would be the advantage if all four cities agree. 28 29 Finke replied that there is a high likelihood that capacity would not be reached by 2024 30 because of the vacant multi-family designated site in Medina. He stated that staff 31 advocates doing the project in conjunction with the street to achieve cost savings. 32 33 Johnson noted the street section should be completed with the sewer pipe upgrade, the 34 cost would be over $600,000 if the street project is handled separately from the sewer 35 pipe upgrade. 36 37 Mark Kaltsas, City Administrator for Independence, thanked the Council for allowing 38 them to speak and try to come to an agreement on this matter. He provided background 39 information on the proposed development request and noted that even though it was not 40 included in their long-term plans, it would make sense for this property to connect to the 41 sewer as it is adjacent to the lake. He stated that they believe they could design an 42 upgrade to their current lift station to address peak flow issues, actually reducing the 43 peak flow. He stated that he is waiting to receive feedback from the other cities and 44 recognized the savings in completing the update with the street project. He also 45 recognized that development of the multi-family housing site in Medina is what would 46 trigger the issue of capacity. He stated that if the connections amendment to the 47 agreement were approved it would allow them to move forward and there would be 48 additional time to work out the details for capacity improvements. He stated that the 49 development has been approved through preliminary plat thus far and they were hopeful 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 4, 2023 6 to resolve this issue and the Comprehensive Plan amendment for Independence before 1 they consider final plat. 2 3 Martin noted that it will be the last person in for development that will face the crisis. 4 She stated that if this is approved, it would be the Medina project that would then be at 5 risk therefore Medina is attempting to address this issue now rather than wait for the 6 Medina development. She stated that they would like assurance that when the capacity 7 issue is identified, all four cities would contribute. She recognized that Independence 8 has proposed the concept of splitting the amendments to the agreement which would 9 allow their development to move forward. 10 11 Cultis confirmed that could be something to consider. He stated that Independence is 12 prepared to support the amendment and anticipated that Greenfield would not oppose 13 because their share would be less. He stated that Loretto may be the harder vote 14 because of their share of the cost. He noted that Loretto was able to connect because 15 they believed that there was excess capacity available, and no one anticipated that 16 allowing those connections would reach capacity. He stated that their development, as 17 proposed, would not increase the flow. He stated that they have been in discussions 18 with the Metropolitan Council, noting that they are in the process of their own capacity 19 study. 20 21 Finke stated that Hennepin County has already delayed the road project by one year in 22 order to allow Maple Plain to complete watermain improvements. He noted that staff 23 would like to continue discussions with Hennepin County on the proposed road project to 24 coordinate other improvements in Medina as well. He stated that staff would like to be 25 prepared in order to complete these things in the most cost-effective manner. 26 27 Martin commented that it seems that Medina and Independence are going to work 28 cooperatively to move the Quad Cities Agreement forward. 29 30 DesLauriers stated that when this topic first arose for the 26 units it was its own issue 31 that has now been combined with the Quad Cities Agreement. 32 33 Finke replied that if there would have been sufficient capacity in the system, the 34 amendment would still be necessary to allow the additional units. He explained that as a 35 result of the capacity analysis, the additional amendment was identified. 36 37 Martin commented that it makes her feel more comfortable to hear that there is 38 preliminary plat approval with the grading permit that puts that risk on the developer. 39 40 Kaltsas confirmed that the preliminary plat approval is contingent upon the amendment 41 to the Quad Cities Agreement. He stated that they would like to get the units to allow 42 connection and could then address the capacity issues. He explained that 43 Independence has concerns with how the capacity issue arose, as there was plenty of 44 capacity available prior to the connection of Loretto. 45 46 1. Amendment to the Quad City Agreement 47 Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to approve the amendment to the Quad-48 City Agreement as presented by staff at the meeting. 49 50 A roll call vote was performed: 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 4, 2023 7 1 DesLauriers aye 2 Albers aye 3 Cavanaugh aye 4 Martin aye 5 6 Motion passed unanimously. 7 8 C. SWPPP Ordinance Amendments (7:49 p.m.) 9 Scherer noted that these are mandated updates to the SWPPP. 10 11 Albers referenced Section 347.3.03 and asked if street should be added. 12 13 Anderson noted that rights-of-way is listed which would include streets. 14 15 Finke commented that the penalty on dog waste is set as a petty misdemeanor as staff 16 believed that to be sufficient. 17 18 Albers asked for details on enforcement. 19 20 Anderson replied that if it were enforced it would be a nominal fine and would not require 21 a court appearance or misdemeanor citations. He stated that staff believed it would be 22 better public policy versus the use of a misdemeanor which was suggested in the model 23 ordinance. 24 25 Johnson stated that they are limited on staff and did not believe enforcement would be a 26 priority for the Police Department and the City is simply responding to what is being 27 required. 28 29 Martin asked for details on the penalty for salt. 30 31 Anderson provided additional details on the penalty. He noted that it is not specified 32 which would then default to a misdemeanor and the prosecutor would have the ability to 33 reduce to a petty misdemeanor. 34 35 Martin commented that salt and sand is much more hazardous to water than dog poop 36 and therefore she would agree with the difference in penalty. 37 38 1. Ordinance 704 Pertaining to Disposal of Pet Waste 39 Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to adopt Ordinance 704 pertaining to 40 disposal of pet waste. 41 42 A roll call vote was performed: 43 44 Cavanaugh aye 45 Albers aye 46 DesLauriers aye 47 Martin aye 48 49 Motion passed unanimously. 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 4, 2023 8 2. Resolution 2023-43 to Publish Ordinance 704 by Title and 1 Summary 2 Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to adopt Resolution 2023-43 to publish 3 Ordinance 704 by title and summary. 4 5 A roll call vote was performed: 6 7 Cavanaugh aye 8 Albers aye 9 DesLauriers aye 10 Martin aye 11 12 Motion passed unanimously. 13 14 3. Ordinance 705 Pertaining to Storage of Deicing Materials at 15 Commercial and Industrial Facilities 16 Moved by Albers, seconded by Martin, to adopt Ordinance 705 pertaining to storage of 17 deicing materials at commercial, industrial, and institutional facilities. 18 19 A roll call vote was performed: 20 21 DesLauriers aye 22 Albers aye 23 Martin aye 24 Cavanaugh aye 25 26 Motion passed unanimously. 27 28 4. Resolution 2023-44 to Publish Ordinance 705 by Title and 29 Summary 30 Moved by Albers, seconded by DesLauriers, to adopt Resolution 2023-44 to publish 31 Ordinance 705 by title and summary. 32 33 A roll call vote was performed: 34 35 Martin aye 36 Albers aye 37 DesLauriers aye 38 Cavanaugh aye 39 40 Motion passed unanimously. 41 42 D. Police Department Administrative Assistant Position (7:57 p.m.) 43 Johnson stated that it has become evident that a full-time role is necessary, rather than 44 the part-time position, for emergency management services. 45 46 Nelson commented on the feedback he received from the previous and current part-time 47 administrative assistant for his department that they feel overworked. He provided 48 additional information on the lengthy process required to respond to data requests. He 49 commented that those employees were taking work home to complete on their own time 50 because they did not have enough time to complete the tasks during their workday. He 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 4, 2023 9 stated that with new requirements it would seem the right time to add a full-time 1 administrative assistant position. He reviewed some of the tasks that this position would 2 handle. He stated that there are cost savings within his budget for this year because of 3 an Officer position that remains unfilled but was authorized for the beginning of the year 4 but recognized that there would be a future budget impact. 5 6 Martin recognized that the employees mentioned are hardworking and wanted to ensure 7 employees are compensated appropriately. 8 9 Albers stated that his concern would not be with this year but the impact to future year 10 budgeting. He asked if there are other staffing needs that should also be considered. 11 12 Johnson stated that there have been further discussions about staffing. 13 14 Scherer commented that public works is going to try to restructure and work with 15 consultants to lessen the burden on administrative staff. 16 17 Martin commented that it would appear that department also has a staffing issue then. 18 19 Scherer commented that if people are not going to be taking work home, or getting comp 20 time, work would need to be shifted somewhere. 21 22 Johnson commented that staff sometimes tries to handle too much internally and some 23 of that work could be shifted to WSB. He stated that Barnhart and Nelson have had 24 discussions about budget impact, and it was determined that the cost difference 25 between part-time and full-time would be about $45,000. 26 27 Barnhart provided additional details on the cost for the full-time position. She stated that 28 they are also working with departments to ensure staff is reporting their time accurately. 29 She stated that if people are taking work home with them, they are not accurately 30 compensated and they are not able to truly assess for staffing needs. 31 32 Martin asked and received confirmation that the administrative assistant positions are 33 paid hourly. She stated that another option is overtime if the employee wanted to do the 34 additional work, but it cannot be forced. 35 36 Barnhart commented that there will always be work. She recognized that there is 37 deadline driven work, but sometimes an employee has to stop for the day if the intent is 38 just to complete all the work. 39 40 Albers asked if there is an estimate of the time spent on an annual basis to coordinate 41 and manage Celebration Day. He recognized the core job requirements that take 42 priority but asked how much time the employees are spending on the other activities. 43 44 Nelson stated that social media is very popular and a great way to communicate, but the 45 department does not have staffing to adequately support that. He commented on the 46 process the department is going through related to records retention and data 47 conversion. He noted that some of those tasks listed in the staff report are hard to 48 quantify in terms of staff time. 49 50 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 4, 2023 10 Martin asked if there is anything administratively that the officers handle that could be 1 moved to the additional position. 2 3 Nelson noted that he would intend to move some duties from the admin position to the 4 sergeant position when that person starts. 5 6 Martin commented that with all the discussions that have been had recently related to 7 Celebration Day, perhaps it would make sense to take a year off from that event 8 because there is a lot asked of many people and staff to hold that event. 9 10 DesLauriers stated that he would not support canceling Celebration Day as it is a big 11 deal for the community. He believed a lot of people would be upset if it were canceled. 12 13 Albers referenced the record management project and asked if a consultant could be 14 hired to assist with that process as it seems very specialized and would take that burden 15 off the admin. He stated that perhaps it would make sense to spend more money on 16 that and have it completed more quickly rather than spreading it across the position for 17 the next two years. He stated that perhaps that could be combined with the digitizing of 18 the reports as well. 19 20 Nelson was unsure about having that vulnerable data in someone else’s hands. 21 22 Martin asked and received confirmation that there is adequate storage space for the files 23 and therefore the digitizing of the information may not be a priority. She asked if there 24 are requirements on how long those files must be kept. 25 26 Nelson provided additional details on the records retention requirements. 27 28 Cavanaugh stated that he has trust in Nelson and the management of his department, 29 therefore if he feels the additional time is needed, he supports that. He stated that he 30 would not support canceling Celebration Day. 31 32 Martin commented that there is difficulty for police departments to attract and retain 33 quality officers because of the challenges they face now compared to the past. She 34 commented that anything that can be done to make those officers feel more comfortable 35 and supported is important. She stated that she would advocate to follow the suggestion 36 of Nelson to increase the position. 37 38 Moved by Martin, seconded by DesLauriers, to authorize staff to begin the recruitment 39 process of a full-time administrative assistant for the Police Department coming in at 40 Step 1-2 with a starting wage of $23 to $26/hour DOQ. 41 42 A roll call vote was performed: 43 44 Albers aye 45 Cavanaugh aye 46 DesLauriers aye 47 Martin aye 48 49 Motion passed unanimously. 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 4, 2023 11 Martin recognized that everyone loves Celebration Day but acknowledged the strain it 1 places on staff. She noted that additional assistance may be needed for that event. 2 3 IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (8:20 p.m.) 4 Johnson noted the Board of Appeal and Equalization meeting scheduled for the 5 following night at 6:30 p.m. 6 7 X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (8:20 p.m.) 8 Martin noted that she and Johnson attended the most recent Long Lake Fire Department 9 meeting where the CIP and funding was discussed and provided a summary of that 10 discussion. 11 12 DesLauriers asked for an update on the union contract negotiations. 13 14 Nelson provided an update. 15 16 Johnson noted that he has provided information on this topic weekly Council updates 17 and staff intends to bring to Council information on this topic once it is ready. 18 19 Barnhart noted that there has been a lot of movement on wages for municipalities and 20 therefore the City is undergoing its own study, separate of the union negotiations. 21 22 DesLauriers stated that he would support bringing this to a worksession and closed 23 session for discussion, as the City position has been that the increases provided to 24 police is also given to City staff. 25 26 Johnson explained that supervisors cannot be making less than the people they 27 supervise in the public sector. 28 29 Barnhart explained that in the past the union contract increases have been cost of living 30 increases and Medina has taken the stance that cost of living applies to all positions. 31 She noted that this will also include market wage increases and advised that more 32 details will be provided at the worksession and that will occur prior to the budget 33 discussions in order to have that information for that process. She stated that everyone 34 that was at the negotiation table is aware of the study and is waiting for those results. 35 36 Martin recognized the challenges that police now face and believes that compensation 37 for those officers should be different than administrative staff. 38 39 DesLauriers stated that it may turn out that administrative staff may also need increases, 40 but that should be separate from police. 41 42 Anderson provided more details on the pay equity requirement for cities. 43 44 Cavanaugh asked if it would be possible to break anything out for police for hazard pay 45 that would not impact the other salaries. 46 47 Johnson commented on the different types of pay. 48 49 Anderson noted that he will work with staff to provide those additional details. 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 4, 2023 12 Martin commented that in order to attract and retain a quality police force, there would 1 need to be more market equity. 2 3 Johnson provided additional details on the pay equity system under State Law and used 4 by municipalities. 5 6 Barnhart explained how that system scores different positions and the information that is 7 provided in the market study report to determine which positions need adjustment. She 8 also provided details on how changes impact the pay grade scale, noting that more 9 policy discussion will occur at the worksession. 10 11 Cavanaugh noted that perhaps the topic is split into two worksessions, with more 12 general and background information discussed at the first and more in depth and 13 specific information at the second. 14 15 Albers noted that he would not be in attendance at the May 16th meeting and would not 16 want to miss those discussions. 17 18 XI. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (8:49 p.m.) 19 Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Martin, to approve the bills, EFT 006771E-20 006788E for $74,897.84, order check numbers 054144-054198 for $110,762.19, and 21 payroll EFT 0512604-0512634 for $67,088.41 and payroll manual check 020455 for 22 $1,573.42. 23 24 A roll call vote was performed: 25 26 Cavanaugh aye 27 DesLauriers aye 28 Albers aye 29 Martin aye 30 31 Motion passed unanimously. 32 33 XII. CLOSED SESSION: CONSIDER POTENTIAL OFFER TO PURCHASE 34 PROPERTY LOCATED AT HENNEPIN COUNTY PID 11-118-23-21-0005 35 PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. 13D.05, SUBD. 3(C)(3) 36 Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to adjourn the meeting to closed session at 8:50 37 p.m. to consider potential offer to purchase property located at Hennepin County PID 11-38 118-23-21-0005 pursuant to Minn. Stat. 13D.05, subd. 3(c)(3). 39 40 A roll call vote was performed: 41 42 Cavanaugh aye 43 Albers aye 44 DesLauriers aye 45 Martin aye 46 47 Motion passed unanimously. 48 49 The meeting returned to open session at 9:52 p.m. 50 51 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes April 4, 2023 13 XIII. CLOSED SESSION: CONSIDER OFFER TO PURCHASE RIGHT-OF-WAY 1 EASEMENTS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 435 AND 655 HACKAMORE 2 ROAD PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. 13D.05, SUBD. 3(C)(3) 3 Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers to adjourn the meeting to closed session at 9:53 4 p.m. to consider offer to purchase right-of-way easements on property located at 435 5 and 655 Hackamore Road pursuant to Minn. Stat. 13D.05, subd. 3(c)(3). 6 7 A roll call vote was performed: 8 9 Cavanaugh aye 10 Albers aye 11 DesLauriers aye 12 Martin aye 13 14 Motion passed unanimously. 15 16 The meeting returned to open session at 10:09 p.m. 17 18 XIV. ADJOURN 19 Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to adjourn the meeting at 10:10 p.m. 20 21 A roll call vote was performed: 22 23 Albers aye 24 DesLauriers aye 25 Cavanaugh aye 26 Martin aye 27 28 Motion passed unanimously. 29 30 31 __________________________________ 32 Kathleen Martin, Mayor 33 Attest: 34 35 ____________________________________ 36 Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk 37 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1 April 5, 2023 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION MINUTES OF APRIL 5, 2023 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in session as the Local Board of Appeal and Equalization on April 5, 2023 at 6:30 p.m. at Medina City Hall. Mayor Martin presided. Members present: Albers, DesLauriers, and Martin Members absent: Cavanaugh and Reid Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson; City Assessor Rolf Erickson, Southwest Assessing; and Representative of the Hennepin County Assessor's Office Dave Thomsen. Mayor Martin provided an overview of the meeting, appeals process, and meeting procedures. Property owners can appeal to Hennepin County if they disagree with the recommendation of the local board. City Assessor Rolf Erickson provided an overview of the purpose of the Board of Appeal and the meeting process. He explained that this evening’s session is based on past year assessments and transactions between October 1, 2021 and September 30, 2022. He stated that tonight’s session is to discuss classifications or market values. Specifically, 2023 values for 2024 taxes. Jay Silver, 3024 Wild Flower Trail City Assessor Rolf Erickson provided information on the property. The City Council reviewed the information and agreed to no change to the assessor’s valuation of $843,400. Steve and Sally Skallerud, 305 Lythrum Lane City Assessor Rolf Erickson provided information on the property. The City Council reviewed the information and agreed to no change to the assessor’s valuation of $1,137,200. Orson Ledeezma Castro, 3910 Linden Place City Assessor Rolf Erickson provided information on the property. The City Council reviewed the information and agreed to reduce the value to the assessor’s recommendation of $885,000. Brock Phillips, 749 Woodland Hill Court City Assessor Rolf Erickson provided information on the property. The City Council reviewed the information and agreed to reduce the value to the assessor’s recommendation of $1,697,000. Roger and Shirley Spiry, 3140 Cedar Ave City Assessor Rolf Erickson provided information on the property. The City Council reviewed the information and agreed to reduce the value to the assessor’s recommendation of $518,700. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2 April 5, 2023 Russell and Loretta Berman, 2595 Keller Road City Assessor Rolf Erickson provided information on the property. Russell Berman provided information on his and neighboring property. The City Council reviewed the information and agreed to reduce the value to $1,550,000. Karl Hanson & Adalia Espinosa, 2000 Lost Horse Road City Assessor Rolf Erickson provided information on the property. Karl Hanson provided information on neighboring properties. Hennepin County Assessor Dave Thomsen provided information on the County’s assessment process in response to Mr. Hanson’s questions. The City Council reviewed the information and agreed to make no change to the valuation of $604,600. Jonathan Ruffing, 12-118-23-31-0049 Hennepin County Assessor Dave Thomsen provided information on the property. The City Council reviewed the information and agreed to change the valuation to $140,000. Graphic Packaging, 4535 Willow Drive Hennepin County Assessor Dave Thomsen provided information on the property. The City Council reviewed the information and agreed to make no change to the valuation of $15,803,000. Mayor Martin summarized all the decisions made by the Board at the April 5, 2023 meeting. Staff clarified that any new appeals from residents after today could be appealed directly to the Hennepin County Board of Review and Equalization Meeting in June (information on tax statements). If residents disagree with decisions made by the Board of Appeal and Equalization, they can also appeal to the Hennepin County Board of Review and Equalization Meeting in June. DesLauriers moved to accept all the changes discussed at the Board of Appeal and Equalization Meeting, Albers seconded and the motion passed unanimously. Motion passed unanimously. Adjournment DesLauriers moved, Albers seconded, to adjourn at 7:57 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. _________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: ____________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3 April 5, 2023 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: April 11th, 2023 MEETING: April 18th, 2023 SUBJECT: Hamel Athletic Club Grounds and Concession Service Agreements History The City and Hamel Athletic Club have always worked closely with the common goal of providing baseball to Medina and surrounding communities via the Medina Park system. A review of fees associated to services in direct support of baseball was conducted and is included in the contract, as well as a basic fee for administration, building maintenance, and general facilities depreciation. Parking language, and language to denote the partnership between HAC and the Hamel Hawks has also been added to the agreement. Parking The City has purchased signage for both Brockton Lane and Uptown Hamel to direct baseball spectators to the overflow parking at the Mill Street entrance. Police will monitor traffic early in the season to detour spectators from parking in the Villas of Copper Creek neighborhood. HAC will be invoiced for this service, per the City’s fee schedule. Staff will meet with neighborhood representatives and the City of Plymouth next week to discuss options to further detour parking in the development. Additionally, HAC has adjusted game start times to alleviate any overlap and try to create a gap between games. Grounds Service Agreement It was discovered during the thorough review of the grounds service agreement that costs associated with baseball usage have not been adjusted in several years. Staff has updated the agreement to include actual costs which are in direct support of the baseball program. The dollar amount in the contract includes a second mowing once a week, portable sanitation units, utilities, and cleaning services. Concession Service Agreement The agreement has been updated to reflect the current year / season. Staff Recommendations • Approve the grounds service agreement with the Hamel Athletic Club for the 2023 baseball season. • Approve the concession service agreement with the Hamel Athletic Club for the 2023 baseball season. MEMORANDUM Agenda Item #6A ME230-1PW-868806.v2 2023 GROUNDS SERVICES AGREEMENT This 2023 Grounds Services Agreement (“Agreement”) is made this 18th day of April 2023, by and between the Hamel Athletic Club, P.O. Box 62, Hamel, MN 55340, a Minnesota non-profit corporation (the “Contractor”), Hamel Hawks Baseball Club, a Minnesota non-profit corporation (the “Hamel Hawks”), and the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”). RECITALS WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into a contract for grounds services for the baseball fields and associated facilities located at Hamel Legion Park and Hunter Lion’s Park during 2023; and, WHEREAS, the Contractor is again willing and able to provide said services to the City so that it can maintain an ability to use said fields during its preferred dates and times; and WHEREAS, Hamel Hawks also desires to use said facilities for its games in coordination with the Contractor and during the Contractor’s reserved times; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to define the scope of such services and requirements related thereto, which are to be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: TERMS 1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES. The Contractor will perform “grounds services” for the City on all fields on the attached Exhibit A. “Grounds services” will consist of: • Picking up paper, trash, and debris following ball field use. This shall include keeping all dugouts clean and sweeping daily. Individual parties renting the fields will be responsible for cleaning up their own trash and debris, however, the Contractor will be responsible should the renters fail to perform their duties. • Grooming and dragging ball fields for Contractor’s scheduled practices, games, and tournaments. • Mowing, fertilizing, and otherwise maintaining the infields, including weed control. • Chalking ball fields for Contractor’s scheduled games and tournaments. • Preparing fields after rain to get them in playing condition to include getting rid of standing water and use of diamond dry when needed. • Maintaining the lips of all fields and re-edging each field every year as determined by the City. • Maintaining pitcher’s mound and home plate daily for all fields. • Working with the City on rolling the fields once during the contract term, at a time and date designated by the City. In consideration for providing the grounds services, the Contractor was provided with the first option to reserve dates for baseball and softball games, practices, tournaments and ME230-1PW-868806.v2 clinics, taking place between April 1, 2023 and October 15, 2023 on the fields depicted as Areas A, B, and C on Exhibit A, and the Contractor has reserved the dates and times provided in Section 3.02. The parties understand that the Hunter Lions Park ballfield (Area D in Exhibit A) is not available for use in 2023 due to its current condition unless otherwise authorized by the City, in its sole discretion. The Contractor will conduct its team formation tryouts on a weekend or weekends in April. The Contractor will also use these days to do field preparation. All of the Contractor’s schedules and activities shall be coordinated and approved by the City’s staff liaison to this Agreement, and accordingly, the dates and times provided in Section 3.02 have been approved. The Contractor may allow the Hamel Hawks to also use the ballfields during such dates and times, and may in turn delegate certain ground services required herein to the Hamel Hawks, provided, however, that nothing contained herein absolves the Contractor from the requirement that the ground services be performed. Whenever possible, the City will provide the Contractor with 30 days’ advanced notice of any other events scheduled for the fields outside of the dates and times provided in Section 3.02 so that conflicts can be avoided. The Contractor will provide the City staff liaison with an email contact list to help facilitate this communication. 2.0. TERM. The term of this contract will be from April 1, 2023, to October 31, 2023. 2.01 RIGHT OF FIRST OFFER FOR USE FOLLOWING TERM. Prior to marketing the fields depicted on the attached Exhibit A to others for use in 2024, the City will first give notice to the Contractor that the fields will be made available to others and the terms (including the number of fields, days and hours) to be contained in any such offer. The Contractor will have the right to reserve the fields during those days and times in 2024 by giving the City notice of its election within 30 days of receipt of the City’s terms. 3.0 COMPENSATION AND USAGE TERMS. 3.01 The Contractor shall provide the City with a $1,000.00 deposit by May 1, 2023, as a deposit for use of the City ball fields and facilities as provided herein. The City shall retain the deposit during the term of this Agreement for any actual costs it incurs to repair damages to facilities as a result of the field use authorized herein or for costs incurred by the City to perform services which the Contractor failed to perform as required in this Agreement. The City shall return any remaining balance of the deposit to the Contractor within 30 days following termination of the Agreement or instead may, at the Contractor’s request, apply the deposit to next season’s agreement. If expenses are incurred by the City in repairs or in the performance of services otherwise obligated to be performed by the Contractor under this Agreement in an amount in excess of the deposit, the City will submit a bill for the difference between the actual cost and the deposit to the Contractor and the Contractor agrees to pay such balance within 30 days of receipt. 3.02 In addition to providing the ground services as required herein, the ME230-1PW-868806.v2 Contractor will pay the City the amount of $15,017.62 for use of the Hamel Legion Park recreational fields, Areas A, B, and C on the attached Exhibit A, from Monday through Friday, 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., and Area C on the attached Exhibit A, on weekends, 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., for use between April 1st and October 15th, 2023. Such payment will be submitted to the City by May 1, 2023. The Contractor will also pay to the City any fees for extra services associated with its use of the park facilities as may be required under the City’s fee schedule. The Contractor may also coordinate scheduling with the Hamel Hawks’ for the shared use of Area C during any of the days and times provided above, and to that end, nothing contained herein precludes the Contractor from separately requiring reimbursement of the amount above from the Hamel Hawks for any respective portion of field use pursuant to such scheduling coordination. 3.03 The Contractor will also receive priority for use of the batting cages in Area A and Area B per the attached Exhibit A from Monday through Friday, 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., from April 1st to October 15, 2023. The Contractor may also use the Hamel Legion Park recreational fields on weekends for training events at no additional cost with the condition that priority would be given to any scheduled group that has paid for a weekend field reservation. 3.04 The Contractor shall also pay the City $2,400.00 ($400.00 per ballfield) by May 1, 2023, to help pay for administration, building maintenance, and general facilities depreciation. Nothing contained herein precludes the Contractor from separately requiring reimbursement of any portion of the amount above from the Hamel Hawks for field use pursuant to any scheduling of Hamel Hawks games during the dates and times provided in Section 3.02. 3.05 If the Contractor fails to pay the City for any of the fees, bills, deposits, expenses, repairs, or damages listed in this Agreement by its due date, a 10% late fee will be applied per month of non-payment. 3.06 The Contractor shall have access to store equipment and tools in the field house garage located in Hamel Legion Park Area A per the attached Exhibit A, the storage shed located near Area B per the attached Exhibit A, and the storage shed located in Hunter Lions Park Area D per the attached Exhibit A. The Contractor shall submit all construction plans to the City and receive written approval from the City’s Public Works Director prior to making any changes to the sheds, storage areas, shelves, or other items in the field house or field house garage at Hamel Legion Park. 3.07 The Contractor shall have access to the Hamel Community Building Assembly Hall for the purpose of youth ball team organizational meetings. The Contractor shall be limited to conducting five such meetings for the duration of this Agreement. The Contractor shall schedule these meetings in advance through the City’s rental agent to avoid scheduling conflicts. 3.08 The City will grant the Contractor a temporary sign permit on the premises at Hamel Legion and Hunter Lions Parks at no cost to the Contractor for event and registration signage in compliance with City sign regulations. ME230-1PW-868806.v2 3.09 The City shall supply Ag Lime for the inner fields and for the outer tracks around the fields in an amount to be mutually agreed upon by both parties. 3.10 The City shall provide reasonable repair to ball fields upon receiving sufficient notice from the Contractor of repair requests and upon sufficient City equipment, materials and labor being available. These repairs are not the grounds services provided by the Contractor, but damages to the ball fields which the Public Works Director deems separate from the responsibilities of the Contractor as defined in this Agreement. 3.11 The City shall contract for cleaning services of the Field House bathroom facilities twice a week between the dates of April 15 and October 15, 2023. The City will invoice the Contractor for additional cleaning requests made by the Contractor as billed by the City’s cleaning service provider. 3.12 The City shall provide a garbage enclosure and garbage and recycling containers at the ball fields and shall coordinate collection at the garbage enclosure twice a week between the dates of April 15 and October 15, 2023. 3.13 The City shall provide grass mowing of the ball fields excluding the infields twice a week from April 25 to July 31 and once a week from August 1 through October 15, 2023, or less as needed, and weed control of the ball fields as needed. To help league play, the Contractor requests that the mowing be performed on Mondays and Thursdays (weather permitting), so that grass length does not hamper play. 4.00 SIGN ADVERTISEMENT PROGRAM. The Contractor shall be allowed to sell sign advertisements to area businesses to be placed on the ball field fences or scoreboards in Hamel Legion Park per the following conditions: 4.01 All proceeds from the program must be used for capital improvements or facility maintenance within Hamel Legion Park such as ball field lights, irrigation system, dugouts, scoreboards, pitching mounds, or field house content or building repairs, etc. 4.02 The Contractor must maintain records of revenues and expenses from the sign advertisement program and provide records to the City. 4.03 Sign dimensions and materials must be uniform and be approved by the City staff liaison. 4.04 Signs may be placed on the scoreboards or outfield fences facing home plate or on the ball field fences facing the walkway toward the field house as long as the signs do not restrict anyone’s view of the fields. No signs may be placed facing Brockton Lane. 4.05 Signs will be purchased, installed, and maintained by the Contractor. It will be the sole responsibility of the Contractor to repair and replace damaged signs and any damage such signs may cause to the fence on the fields of the park. 4.06 Signs will only be allowed to be displayed on the fences in the park during the ME230-1PW-868806.v2 regular season from April 1 to October 15, 2023. It is the responsibility of the Contractor to remove fence signs by October 31, 2023. 5.0 SALE OF FOOD AND BEVERAGES. The sale of food and beverages during Contractor or Hamel Hawk use of the ballfields is prohibited unless a separate agreement or license is granted by the City. 6.0 PARKING. 6.01 The Contractor shall schedule traffic control during early season events to educate its participants on available parking locations serving the ballfields. This includes the use of City police personnel during those early season events to assist with traffic control and education. 6.02 To minimize parking limitations in the area, the Contractor will incorporate into its programming schedule appropriate transitions by staggering scheduled start times, especially during days with high volume usage. 6.03 The Contractor and Hamel Hawks will provide all of its participants and users with detailed written parking information prior to and during the season, and such materials must include directions to preferred parking areas that are available for park visitors. 6.04 The City may, in its sole discretion, install signage at or near the park to direct users to preferred parking areas that are available for park users. 6.05 The City may also, in its sole discretion, utilize its staff and police personnel to monitor parking during events to ensure that users are adhering to City expectations, and may thereafter provide further guidelines or require additional actions. The Contractor and the Hamel Hawks, as the case may be, shall adhere to such guidelines or take such additional action as directed by the City. 7.0 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. 7.01 In relation to the ground services provided herein, both the Contractor and the City acknowledge and agree that the Contractor is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. Any employee or subcontractor who may perform services for the Contractor in connection with this Agreement is also not an employee of the City. The Contractor understands that the City will not provide any benefits of any type in connection with this Agreement, including but not limited to health or medical insurance, worker’s compensation insurance and unemployment insurance, nor will the City withhold any state or federal taxes, including income or payroll taxes, which may be payable by the Contractor. 7.02 The Contractor will supply and use its own equipment and tools to complete the services under this Agreement. ME230-1PW-868806.v2 7.03 The Contractor acknowledges that any general instruction it receives from the City has no effect on its status as an independent contractor. 8.0 INSURANCE. During the entire term of this Agreement, both the Contractor and Hamel Hawks will each maintain adequate insurance to protect itself and the City from claims and liability for injury or damage to persons or property for all work performed by the Contractor and its employees, agents, and subcontractors under this Agreement and use of the fields as contemplated herein. The Contractor and Hamel Hawks shall name the City as an additional insured under their respective general liability policy which shall remain in force during the term of this Agreement and shall maintain limits of liability under such policy of not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate, issued by an insurance company rated no less than A- by AM Best Company. Prior to performing any services under this Agreement or using the fields as contemplated herein, the Contractor and Hamel Hawks shall each provide evidence to the City that acceptable insurance coverage is effective. 9.0 WORKER’S COMPENSATION. 9.01 In relation to the ground services, the Contractor will comply, and will ensure that each of its subcontractors comply, with the provisions of the Minnesota worker’s compensation statute as an independent contractor before commencing work under this Agreement. 9.02 The Contractor and any subcontractors will provide their own worker’s compensation insurance and will provide evidence to the City of such coverage before commencing work under this Agreement. 10.0 INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor and the Hamel Hawks will each hold harmless and indemnify the City, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs, and expenses (including defense, settlement, and reasonable attorney’s fees) for claims as a result of bodily injury, loss of life, property damages and any other damages arising out of their respective performance or failure to perform under this Agreement. 11.0 PRIVATIZATION CLAUSE. The Contractor and Hamel Hawks agree to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (the “Act”) and all other applicable state and federal laws relating to data privacy or confidentiality. All data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated in performing obligations hereunder is subject to the requirements of the Act, and the Contractor and Hamel Hawks must comply with the requirements of the Act as if they were a government entity. 12.0 APPLICABLE LAW. The execution, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement will, in all respects, be controlled and governed by the laws of Minnesota. 13.0 ASSIGNMENT. Unless expressly permitted herein, the Contractor or Hamel Hawks may not assign any rights or obligations under this Agreement or procure the services of another individual or entity to provide services under this Agreement without first obtaining the express ME230-1PW-868806.v2 written consent of the City. The parties shall provide the City with copies of all contracts for assigned or subcontracted services, if authorized. 14.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT; AMENDMENTS. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties, and no other agreement prior to or contemporaneous with this Agreement shall be effective, except as expressly set forth or incorporated herein. Any purported amendment to this Agreement is not effective unless it is in writing and executed by all parties. 15.0 NO WAIVER BY CITY. By entering into this Agreement, the City does not waive its entitlement to any immunities under statute or common law. 16.0 TERMINATION. The City may terminate this Agreement at any time, for any reason. The Contractor must give no less than a 30-day written notice to the City to terminate this Agreement. The Contractor shall pay the City all sums due and the Contractor shall remain obligated to meet all applicable provisions of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year written above. CITY OF MEDINA By: ____________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor By: ____________________________________ Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator HAMEL ATHLETIC CLUB By: ____________________________________ Pat Truax, President HAMEL HAWKS BASEBALL CLUB By: ____________________________________ Its: ____________________________________ ME230-1PW-868806.v2 EXHIBIT A Hamel Legion Park Recreational Fields Hunter Lions Park Ball Field Area A Area D Area C Area B 1 HAMEL LEGION PARK CONCESSION SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS HAMEL LEGION PARK CONCESSION SERVICES AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is entered into this 18th day of April, 2023, by and between the City of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City") and the Hamel Athletic Club, a Minnesota non-profit corporation (the "Contractor"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the City owns the Tom Anderson Fields Four-Plex in Hamel Legion Park (the “Site”) which was constructed for general community recreational use; and, WHEREAS, the City desires to make available the sale of food and beverage concessions (the “Concessions”) as a benefit to the general public at the Site in a City owned field house (the “Facility”); and, WHEREAS, the Contractor has demonstrated professional expertise to provide said Concession services; and, WHEREAS, the City and Contractor wish to specify certain terms and conditions relating to the Site and the operation, maintenance and use of the Facility for the Concessions. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual promises and obligations contained herein, the parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT ARTICLE I. CONTRACT DURATION This Agreement shall be in effect from the date of execution of this Agreement through October 31, 2023. The City and Contractor shall meet for a post season review after October 31st of each year to discuss the agreement and the duties of each party to determine if an amendment needs to be made for the next season. ARTICLE II. DUTIES OF THE CONTRACTOR 1. Equipment Approvals. The Contractor agrees to provide Contractor owned NSF-certified equipment, approved by Hennepin County Health Department, for Concessions operated on the Site and in the Facility. 2. Inventory Requirements. The Contractor agrees to purchase and maintain an inventory of Concessions and to provide such Concessions as sale items. The Agenda Item # 6B 2 Contractor agrees further to provide other supplies as necessary for proper Concession operations. 3. Specific Concessions to be Provided. The Contractor agrees to provide beverages, pre-packaged food, and other refreshments for sale to the general public at the Site. The Contractor shall retain all profit from the concession sales. The Contractor shall submit a general list of Concession items and prices to the City with the understanding that specific items may change throughout the season. 4. Responsibility for Facility. The Contractor will be responsible for any damage to the Site, the Facility, and the Facility’s contents. 5. Times and Dates of Concession Services. Concessions shall be open during regularly scheduled field use by the Contractor, as separately approved by the City, beginning April 1, 2023 through October 31, 2023. 6. First Right of Refusal to Serve Concessions. The Contractor shall have first right of refusal to serve Concessions during the hours of ball field use. If the Contractor is unable to serve Concessions on any given day, a third party may be allowed to provide Concession services at the Facility if they either (i) first obtain any required licensure through the Hennepin County Department of Health, or (ii) if the Contractor agrees to allow the third party to operate under the Contractor’s existing license. The Contractor may require that the third party operating under its license provide a damage deposit if said third party desires to use the Contractor’s equipment, and it will be the Contractor’s responsibility to remove from the Facility any Contractor-owned equipment and inventory that will not be used by the third party. All Concession services provided hereunder shall comply with all Minnesota Department of Health regulations. 7. Management of Food Concession Operations. The Contractor shall provide trained staff for Concession operations at the Site. The Contractor agrees also to train and supervise all workers and volunteers for proper Concession handling and cleanup. 8. Payments to City. No rental fees will be owed under this Agreement for the Contractor’s use of the Facility for Concession operations. However, the Contractor will pay to the City any fees for extra services in accordance with the City’s fee schedule. 9. Compliance with Laws. The Contractor agrees to comply with all City Code requirements, including licensing and permit requirements for Concession operations, and shall abide by the orders and instructions of the City’s designated inspectors. The Contractor also agrees to comply with all local, State, and Federal laws, rules, and regulations that apply to such Concessions, including but not limited to, health and sanitary codes regarding the preparation, sale and storage of food. The Contractor shall, at its own expense, obtain and keep in effect all licenses and permits which may be required by law to operate the Facility. Contractor shall require all volunteers to exercise courtesy and consideration in their relations with the public. The Contractor shall be responsible for the payment of any sales taxes and/or personal property taxes which may 3 be due as a result of the Concession or Facility operations. Neither Contractor nor Contractor’s employees or volunteers shall be considered employees of the City for any purpose. 10. Records and Reports. The Contractor agrees to maintain an internal control system which shall include tracking all revenues and expenditures. The Contractor agrees to provide unaudited financial statements to the City upon request by the City. 11. Clean Up and Area Maintenance. The Contractor agrees to be responsible for daily cleaning of the Facility and its service area and daily pick up of all trash and debris located within 100 feet of the Facility. All garbage and recyclables shall be properly deposited in the garbage enclosure. The Contractor agrees to occasionally check the restrooms to ensure they remain orderly; this includes restocking soap and toilet paper and emptying garbage containers when needed. The Contractor shall be responsible for the cleaning of all equipment and the removal of all Concession supplies from the Site immediately following the close of the season. ARTICLE III. DUTIES OF THE CITY The City shall supply the Facility with electric, water and sewer utilities and will incorporate fees for these services into the separate Grounds Service Agreement between the parties. The City shall supply the Facility with the proper cleaning supplies, garbage bags, soap, and toilet paper. The City shall be responsible for regular maintenance to the building including bi-weekly cleaning of the restrooms. The City shall supply the Site with adequate solid waste and recyclable containers. The City shall arrange for bi-weekly garbage and recycling collection by a licensed hauler to be picked up at the garbage enclosure. ARTICLE IV. INSURANCE The Contractor shall be responsible for insuring all of its personal property brought and maintained at the Site. During the performance of services, the Contractor shall maintain the following minimum insurance coverage and name the City as an additional insured: A. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance: $2,000,000 combined single limit with bodily injury limits of not less than $2,000,000 for each occurrence and not less than $2,000,000 in the aggregate, and with property damage limits of not less than $2,000,000 for each occurrence. B. Workers Compensation Insurance in accordance with Minnesota State Laws. C. Property damage insurance to adequately cover repair and replacement costs for the Contractor’s property. ARTICLE V. INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor shall take all reasonable precautions for the safety of all users of the Site and shall provide reasonable protection to prevent damage to the Site. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, agents, and 4 employees from and against all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including attorney fees arising out of or resulting from the performance of Concession operations and services under this Agreement by the Contractor, its officers, employees, members and agents. Nothing herein shall be construed as waiving any statutory limitation on liability available to the City. ARTICLE VI. PRIVATIZATION CLAUSE Contractor agrees to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (the “Act”) and all other applicable state and federal laws relating to data privacy or confidentiality. All data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained or disseminated by the Contractor in performing its obligations is subject to the requirements of the Act, and the Contractor must comply with the requirements of the Act as if the Contractor was a government entity. ARTICLE VII. TERMINATION Either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason by giving a thirty (30) day written notice to the other party. ARTICLE VIII. ASSIGNMENT The Contractor shall not assign all or any portion of this Agreement without the City’s prior written consent, which consent the City may withhold at its sole discretion. ARTICLE IX. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. CITY OF MEDINA By: ________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor By: ________________________________ Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator HAMEL ATHLETIC CLUB By: ________________________________ Pat Truax, President 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: April 13, 2023 MEETING: April 18, 2023 SUBJECT: 2023 Pavement Rehabilitation Projects Summary At the February 21, 2023, meeting, the City Council received the feasibility reports and called for the public hearings for the following road improvement projects and levying special assessments: • Pinto Drive (South of Hamel Road) • Cheyenne Trail • Meadowwoods Trail and Cherokee Road • The Foxberry Farms Area • Medina Highlands and Clydesdale Trail East The resolutions to approve plans according to feasibility reports, ordering road improvement projects and adopting the assessment roll for each project are in your packet. Council will also hold public hearings on the street improvement projects and levying special assessments for same. I plan to manage these projects. Our contractors are on board and below are the final steps required before work can begin. Staff will have a short presentation for each project as Council works through the recommended motions. Staff Recommendation • Motion to adopt resolutions approving plans according to feasibility reports and ordering road improvement projects. • Hold assessment hearings for each project individually. • Motion to adopt resolution adopting assessments roll for each street individually. Attachments • Resolution to order projects and approve plans and specs for the above street improvement projects. • Resolution adopting assessment roll for the above street improvement projects. MEMORANDUM Agenda Item #9A Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 Member __ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xx RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ACCORDING TO FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING THE PINTO DRIVE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to previous actions by the city council, city staff has prepared plans and specifications for the overlay Pinto Drive Improvement Project and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval. WHEREAS, ten days’ mailed notice and two weeks’ published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held on April 18, 2023, at which hearing all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby adopted. 2. The above-described improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 3. The improvement is hereby ordered as proposed. Dated: April 18, 2023 Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member __ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: - and the following voted against same: - Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 Member __ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xx RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PINTO DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the city clerk has, with the assistance of the public works director and the city finance director, prepared a proposed roll regarding the assessment of benefited properties for a portion of the cost of the Pinto Drive improvement project which consists of mill and overlay improvements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to notice as required by law, the city council conducted a public hearing on April 18, 2023, with regard to the proposed assessments and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute a special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The special assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 7 years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2024 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.00% per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2023. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to November 15, 2023, pay the whole of the assessment on such property to the city finance director, with interest accrued to the date of payment, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days of the adoption of the assessment. Thereafter, any owner may pay to the city finance director the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The city clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this resolution to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 2 Dated: April 18, 2023. Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member __ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: - and the following voted against same: - Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 3 MAP ID PIN FEE OWNER ASSESSMENT 1 1111823440002 DONALD L LAURENT 895 Hamel Road HAMEL MN 55340 $677.91 2 1111823410002 MITCHELL FAULHABER 3525 Pinto Drive HAMEL MN 55340 $677.91 3 1211823320005 FOUR LEAF INVESTMENTS LLC 791 Hamel Road HAMEL MN 55340 $1,355.82 4 1211823320038 MARK BELTT 3504 Pinto Drive HAMEL MN 55340 $677.91 5 1211823320034 DAVID L LEINFELDER 3520 Pinto Drive HAMEL MN 55340 $677.91 6 1211823320036 DUANE WALD & AUDREY WALD 3512 Pinto Drive HAMEL MN 55340 $677.91 7 1211823320039 BRIAN D FRAGODT 3500 Pinto Drive HAMEL MN 55340 $677.91 8 1211823320033 JOBETH & MICHAEL R RANFRANZ 3524 Pinto Drive HAMEL MN 55340 $677.91 9 1211823320041 ROBERT T STAUBER 777 Hamel Road HAMEL MN 55340 $338.96 10 1211823320042 ROBERT T STAUBER 775 Hamel Road HAMEL MN 55340 $338.96 11 1211823320043 HONGBIN HOLLY MEN 773 Hamel Road HAMEL MN 55340 $338.96 12 1211823320044 BLUEMOON PROPERTIES LLC 771 Hamel Road HAMEL MN 55340 $338.96 13 1111823410001 JJC HAMEL LLC 805 Hamel Road HAMEL MN 55340 $677.91 14 1211823320035 SHARON RESSLER 3516 Pinto Drive HAMEL MN 55340 $677.91 15 1211823320037 PATRICIA E SCHAEFER 3508 Pinto Drive HAMEL MN 55340 $677.91 $9,490.75 PROPERTY ADDRESS Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 4 Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 Member __ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xx RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ACCORDING TO FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING THE CHEYENNE TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to previous actions by the city council, city staff has prepared plans and specifications for the mill and overlay for the Cheyenne Trail Improvement Project and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval. WHEREAS, ten days’ mailed notice and two weeks’ published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held on April 18, 2023, at which hearing all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby adopted. 2. The above-described improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 3. The improvement is hereby ordered as proposed. Dated: April 18, 2023 Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member __ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: - and the following voted against same: - Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Agenda Item #9B Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 Member __ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xx RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR CHEYENNE TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the city clerk has, with the assistance of the public works director and the city finance director, prepared a proposed roll regarding the assessment of benefited properties for a portion of the cost of the Cheyenne Trail Overlay project which consists of mill and overlay improvements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to notice as required by law, the city council conducted a public hearing on April 18, 2023, with regard to the proposed assessments and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute a special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The special assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 7 years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2024 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.00% per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2023. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to November 15, 2023, pay the whole of the assessment on such property to the city finance director, with interest accrued to the date of payment, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days of the adoption of the assessment. Thereafter, any owner may pay to the city finance director the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The city clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this resolution to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 2 Dated: April 18, 2023. Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member __ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: - and the following voted against same: - Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 3 MAP ID PID FEE OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS PROPOSED ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT 1 1311823340002 VICTOR JONAS/MICHELLE JONAS 400 CHEYENNE TR MEDINA MN 55391 $3,334.52 2 1311823430018 SCOTT & SHARON OFFERMAN 350 CHEYENNE TR WAYZATA MN 55391 $3,334.52 3 1311823430019 MICHAEL & KIMBERLY WALKER 300 CHEYENNE TR WAYZATA MN 55391 $3,334.52 4 1311823340004 CLIFFORD M KOLTES 375 CHEYENNE TR WAYZATA MN 55391 $3,334.52 5 2411823120017 R J & G L SMACIARZ 225 CHEYENNE TR WAYZATA MN 55391 $3,334.52 6 2411823120018 ZACHARY & MEGAN SCHMOLL 275 CHEYENNE TR WAYZATA MN 55391 $3,334.52 7 1311823340003 JOHN & SHIRLEY CRINKLAW 425 CHEYENNE TR WAYZATA MN 55391 $3,334.52 8 1311823340005 MARK T & SHARON FLATEN 325 CHEYENNE TR WAYZATA MN 55391 $3,334.52 9 2411823120019 JEFFREY & KATHLEEN HUSTON 200 CHEYENNE TR WAYZATA MN 55391 $3,334.52 30,010.68 Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 4 Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 Member __ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xx RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ACCORDING TO FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING MEADOWWOODS TRAIL AND CHEROKEE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to previous actions by the city council, city staff has prepared plans and specifications for the overlay for Meadowwoods Trail and Cherokee Road Improvement Project and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval. WHEREAS, ten days’ mailed notice and two weeks’ published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held on April 18, 2023, at which hearing all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby adopted. 2. The above-described improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 3. The improvement is hereby ordered as proposed. Dated: April 18, 2023 Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member __ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: - and the following voted against same: - Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Agenda Item #9C Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 Member __ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xx RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR MEADOWWOODS TRAIL & CHEROKEE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the city clerk has, with the assistance of the public works director and the city finance director, prepared a proposed roll regarding the assessment of benefited properties for a portion of the cost of the Meadowwoods Trail and Cherokee Road Overlay project which consists of mill and overlay improvements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to notice as required by law, the city council conducted a public hearing on April 18, 2023, with regard to the proposed assessments and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute a special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The special assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 7 years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2024 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.00% per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2023. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to November 15, 2023, pay the whole of the assessment on such property to the city finance director, with interest accrued to the date of payment, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days of the adoption of the assessment. Thereafter, any owner may pay to the city finance director the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The city clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this resolution to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 2 Dated: April 18, 2023. Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member __ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: - and the following voted against same: - Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 3 MAP ID PID FEE OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS ASSESSMENT AMOUNT 1 2311823410010 SCOTT & CHANTELLEE THEISEN 1950 MEADOWWOODS TR LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 2 2311823420020 JAMISON & CAROLINE LYNGSTAD 1825 MEADOWWOODS TR LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 3 2311823430007 DANIEL & AMARIS LARTER 1762 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 4 2311823430008 JESSICA & JAMES KINSELLA 1160 CHEROKEE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 5 2311823430011 ROSS & ANGELA DAHLOF 1121 CHEROKEE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 7 2311823440012 DOUGLAS & LUANN DOTY 1795 MEADOWWOODS TR LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 8 2311823410007 SUSAN & PHILIP ZIETLOW 875 CO RD 24 WAYZATA MN 55391 $2,842.46 9 2311823430009 DAVID & GAIL GABBERT 1140 CHEROKEE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 10 2311823440005 DENNIS C NEILSON 1800 MEADOWWOODS LA LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 11 2311823440006 DAVID R WEIR 1760 MEADOWWOODS TR LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 12 2311823440009 JAMES E & JUDY D BRANDENBURG 1715 MEADOWWOODS TR LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 13 2311823410009 DIANNA & ROBERT MCMILLAN 1875 MEADOWWOODS TR MEDINA MN 55356 $2,842.46 14 2311823420018 ERIC & JACKIE PAGEL 1855 MEADOWWOODS TR LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 15 2311823430019 JESSICA & ANDREW VOLKENANT 1815 MEADOWWOODS TR MEDINA MN 55356 $2,842.46 16 2311823440011 JAMES H & DIANA S HERZAN 1775 MEADOWWOODS TR LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 17 2311823410008 SUSAN A ZIETLOW 875 CO RD NO 24 WAYZATA MN 55391 $2,842.46 18 2311823430014 ADRIAN DEAN SMITH 1722 TAMARACK DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 19 2311823440007 ELLEN P SAYER 1730 MEADOWWOODS TR LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 20 2311823440008 MATTHEW & ELIZABETH PETERSON 1700 MEADOWWOODS TR LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 21 2311823440010 STEPHANIE ANN NORRIS 1745 MEADOWWOODS TR LONG LAKE MN 55356 $2,842.46 22 2411823320006 STEPHEN E BARRON 1865 BUCKSKIN DR WAYZATA MN 55391 $2,842.46 59,691.56$ Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 4 Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 Member __ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xx RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ACCORDING TO FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING FOXBERRY FARMS AREA IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to previous actions by the city council, city staff has prepared plans and specifications for the mill, overlay and shouldering material for the Foxberry Farms area Improvement Project and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval. WHEREAS, ten days’ mailed notice and two weeks’ published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held on April 18, 2023, at which hearing all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby adopted. 2. The above-described improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 3. The improvement is hereby ordered as proposed. Dated: April 18, 2023 Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member __ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: - and the following voted against same: - Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Agenda Item #9D Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 Member __ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xx RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR FOXBERRY FARMS STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the city clerk has, with the assistance of the public works director and the city finance director, prepared a proposed roll regarding the assessment of benefited properties for a portion of the cost of the Foxberry Farms Overlay project which consists of mill, overlay and curb improvements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to notice as required by law, the city council conducted a public hearing on April 18, 2023, with regard to the proposed assessments and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute a special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The special assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 7 years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2024 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.00% per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2023. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to November 15, 2023, pay the whole of the assessment on such property to the city finance director, with interest accrued to the date of payment, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days of the adoption of the assessment. Thereafter, any owner may pay to the city finance director the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The city clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this resolution to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 2 Dated: April 18, 2023. Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member __ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: - and the following voted against same: - Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 3 MAP ID PID FEE OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT 1 0211823110007 JENNIFR HODAPP HONKE 4640 FOXBERRY DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 2 0211823110008 KEITH LELAND 4630 FOXBERRY DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 3 0211823110018 JAMES L YOUNG 4675 FOXBERRY DR MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 4 0211823110020 THOMAS J BRANDT 4735 FOXBERRY DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 5 0211823110021 MICHAEL & KAY SULLIVAN 4755 FOXBERRY DR MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 6 0211823110027 GEORGE & HEATHER ALLENDORPH 4780 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 7 0211823110033 SARAH & PATRICK LYON 4680 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 8 0211823120006 BRIAN D NEWMAN 1010 SETTLERS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 9 0211823120011 KARLA KIM SHEEHY 4745 SETTLERS CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 10 0211823120021 ROBERT & DEBRA ENGEBRETSON 1140 SETTLERS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 11 0211823140004 CHRISTOPHER ZACHARIAS & LAURIE G 4415 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 12 0211823140005 PATRICK & ANNE LAUGHLIN 4435 SHOREWOOD TR MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 13 0211823140006 KYLE & MOLLY BERGACKER 4455 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 14 0211823140013 TODD LADWIG & STACY LADWIG 4500 MAPLE LEAF CT MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 15 0211823140016 ADAM & MICHELLE NISSEN 4512 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 16 0211823140027 CRAIG D THEIS/KARRI B THEIS 900 FOX PATH CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 17 0211823140038 MARK R & ROBYN A ROE 4590 FOXBERRY DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 18 0211823140039 MICHAEL DARCY ZARNS 4580 FOXBERRY DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 19 0211823140041 JESSE LITWAK & AMY LITWAK 4540 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 20 0211823140043 PRAFUL M KELKAR 4557 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 21 0211823140046 JAMES & KAREN MARTIN 4620 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 22 0211823410014 CHAD SEGNER & AMBREA SEGNER 875 FOXBERRY FARMS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 23 0211823410016 BORIS &JENNY CHAPLIN 925 FOXBERRY FARMS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 24 0211823410019 DANIEL L BALON 820 FOXBERRY FARMS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 25 0211823410020 REBECCA &GINTAUTAS GARSYS 840 FOXBERRY FARMS RD MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 26 0211823410022 T J GOEDDERZ & C S GOEDDERZ 880 FOXBERRY FARMS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 27 0211823410032 DAVID & AMY KLAIMAN 950 SUNSET CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 28 0211823410038 JOHN & KATHLEEN SHISHILLA 4335 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 29 0211823410040 DEAN & JOELLYN RUSTAD 4305 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 30 0211823410042 BENJAMIN & RACHEL SAYLES 4275 SHOREWOOD TR MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 31 0211823420003 ZACHARY & CARI HERNESS 4185 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 32 0211823420011 SHANE & SARAH KAVANAGH 4045 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 33 0211823420016 JAMES DANIEL TRUWE 1135 FOXTAIL DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 34 0211823110005 ERIC R & SHERRI J CHAFFEE 4660 FOXBERRY DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 35 0211823110016 VINCENT & KARINE LELANDAIS 800 FOXBERRY CIR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 36 0211823110017 RANDOLPH & KATRINA LASOTA 4655 FOXBERRY DR MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 37 0211823110022 CARTER G & CYNTHIA J DREBLOW 4775 FOXBERRY DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 38 0211823110029 MICHAEL & SUZANNE MATULIS 4740 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 39 0211823110036 SCOTT A & PEGGY A WEAVER 4777 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 40 0211823120010 TODD & BREE ANN HAYWORTH 4750 SETTLERS CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 41 0211823120012 MARA & RYAN KAPLAN 4715 SETTLERS CT MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 42 0211823120015 JEFFREY & SAMANTHA DEEB 4687 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 43 0211823120016 TRENT & STEPHANIE SCHON 1015 SETTLERS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 44 0211823120018 JON ARNE & GRETCHEN ARNE 1035 SETTLERS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 45 0211823120019 ALVIN & JENNIFER PURIFOY 1045 SETTLERS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 46 0211823120020 PAUL M & BRENDA HOCKERT 1150 SETTLERS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 47 0211823120022 BENJAMIN & KRISTI SANTELMAN 1110 SETTLERS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 48 0211823120024 BETTY GRAY OLSON 1155 SETTLERS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 49 0211823120025 PAUL & ALLISON ISSA 1145 SETTLERS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 50 0211823120026 MICHAEL S KELLY 1135 SETTLERS RD MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 4 MAP ID PID FEE OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT 51 0211823120028 RYAN & TRACEY KLOCKSIEN 1115 SETTLERS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 52 0211823120029 DOUGLAS JOHN PIPPERT 1105 SETTLERS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 53 0211823130001 HASSAN I ISMAIL 4605 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 54 0211823140003 DUANE G GULLICKSON 4405 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 55 0211823140010 ALYSSA B COX 4475 MAPLE LEAF CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 56 0211823140012 JASON J LOVEN & JILL S LOVEN 4470 MAPLE LEAF CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 57 0211823140018 CEPHAS AGBEH/INE AMACHREE 4504 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 58 0211823140019 HAROLD R OSTER 4500 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 59 0211823140037 BRIAN & ENE SOBOL 4610 FOXBERRY DR MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 60 0211823140040 LANCE E & CAROL H HAZZARD 4550 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 61 0211823140042 JEFFREY & PATRICIA MURADIAN 4537 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 62 0211823140048 PAUL & SHERYL PLATE 4605 FOXBERRY DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 63 0211823410006 KEVIN & ALEXANDRA GRADEN 4260 FOXBERRY CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 64 0211823410008 SUZETTE NORDSTROM & BRADLEY HOV4200 FOXBERRY CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 65 0211823410010 GEORGE T STEINER FAM TRUST 4235 FOXBERRY CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 66 0211823110010 NICHOLAS & SAMANTHA ABBOTT 4650 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 67 0211823110011 DEREK HOLMES 4640 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 68 0211823410011 SYED WAJIH HUSSAIN MASHADI & ERA 4265 FOXBERRY CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 69 0211823410013 D L VERBICK & M A VERBICK 855 FOXBERRY FARMS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 70 0211823410025 L J BOYD/TAMMY LEOMAZZI BOYD 4395 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 71 0211823410035 WILLIAM D & JUDITH A CIORA 915 SUNSET CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 72 0211823110012 CRAIG D FOSS & AUBREY J FOSS 4625 FOXBERRY DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 73 0211823110013 THOMAS A & AMY L SWANSON 950 FOXBERRY CIR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 74 0211823110028 NICOLAS & SHERRI ASHWORTH 4760 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 75 0211823410037 MELISSA & TROY SCHOUVILLER 955 SUNSET CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 76 0211823410045 DAVID P & SHARON L BAUDLER 895 FOX PATH CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 77 0211823410047 ANDREW BAECHLER 855 FOX PATH CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 78 0211823420010 JOHN & ALLISON PINKERTON 4055 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 79 0211823110030 J T OLSEN & S M STUDER-OLSEN 4720 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 80 0211823110032 JOHN GLENN CHINERY & ANNELY MER 4690 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 81 0211823110034 MICHAEL & KELLEEN LEHMAN 4670 MEDINA LAKE DR MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 82 0211823120003 BERNARD & VICTORIA GRUBER 4657 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 83 0211823420012 TERENCE E & PEGGY R ZIMMER 4075 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 84 0211823120005 JOHN P LEPHART/GRACE LEPHART 4707 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 85 0211823120007 ANDREW & JENNIFER HUNKINS 4700 SETTLERS CT MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 86 0211823120008 MARK SPINDLER & JOLENE S WADE-SP 4720 SETTLERS CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 87 0211823130002 RANDALL & CYNTHIA GOWAN 4627 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 88 0211823140007 CHERI JACOBY 4475 SHOREWOOD TR MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 89 0211823140014 DOUGLAS W/SHELLEY K FISCHER 4520 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 90 0211823140015 MICHAEL & KRISTELLE MROSAK 4516 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 91 0211823140028 JAMES & LAURA MALONEY 870 FOX PATH CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 92 0211823140033 WILLIAM M HANSEN 850 FOX PATH CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 93 0211823140044 DEVIN & JENNA FUCHS 4567 MEDINA LAKE DR MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 94 0211823140045 DERRICK & ALYSSA GIRARD 4587 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 95 0211823410009 THOMAS J & PAULA J MERTENS 4205 FOXBERRY CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 96 0211823410015 BLAKE & REBECCA MEISENHEIMER 905 FOXBERRY FARMS RD MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 97 0211823410017 SUSHMA & RAJDEEP PRADHAN 945 FOXBERRY FARMS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 98 0211823410021 JAMES K & MARIA R FRANCIS 860 FOXBERRY FARMS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 99 0211823410023 RENAE K HAMEED 4355 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 100 0211823410033 PAMELA LYNN ALLEN 930 SUNSET CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 5 MAP ID PID FEE OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT 101 0211823410041 MICHAEL & AMY VOGSLAND 4295 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 102 0211823410050 ANDREW &JESSICA SEIBENICK 835 FOX PATH CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 103 0211823420002 RICHARD LU & YAN HUANG 4205 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 104 0211823420004 BLAKE & MEGAN SANDVOLD 4165 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 105 0211823420005 JOHN E & SHARON M HITE 4145 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 106 0211823420006 JOHN POAGE & IRINA POAGE 4125 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 107 0211823420007 THOMAS & DEBORAH NICOSKI 4105 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 108 0211823420008 TAMMYLYNNE & BENJAMIN JONAS 4085 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 109 0211823420009 JULIO & CAROLINE AMPUERO 4065 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 110 0211823420013 MARK & LISA DEFFNER 4115 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 111 0211823110006 KRISTIN M TOSTE 4650 FOXBERRY DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 112 0211823110009 PETER & HEATHER HANSSEN 4620 FOXBERRY DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 113 0211823110014 ROBERT C & SUSANNA M WOODS 900 FOXBERRY CIR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 114 0211823110015 ROBERT & LINDA KIEVAL 850 FOXBERRY CIR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 115 0211823110019 JEREMY & ASHLEY ROGOSHESKE 4715 FOXBERRY DR MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 116 0211823110023 VINCENT L & JOYCE S HAYDEN 4795 FOXBERRY DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 117 0211823110031 JAMES & CYNTHIA PARKHURST 4700 MEDINA LAKE DR MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 118 0211823110035 TROY A & JENNIFER L SHORT 4660 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 119 0211823110037 RUTH RIVARD 4737 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 120 0211823120009 LUKE HAMMER & RACHEL HAMMER 4730 SETTLERS CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 121 0211823120013 LORI KURMAN 4705 SETTLERS CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 122 0211823120014 DEBRA & JAMES ANDREWS 4667 MEDINA LAKE DR MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 123 0211823120017 MATT D & BETH L GEURINK 1025 SETTLERS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 124 0211823120023 KENDRA & TIMOTHY SULLIVAN 1165 SETTLERS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 125 0211823120027 DOUGLAS & PAMELA CHRISTENSEN 1125 SETTLERS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 126 0211823140008 ERIC & PAULA DAHMER 4470 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 127 0211823140009 BRIAN KRAATZ & ANDREA KRAATZ 4495 MAPLE LEAF CT MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 128 0211823140017 BRUCE C & RANELLE C KUEHL 4508 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 129 0211823140030 STEVEN & GEORGIANN HOLMQUIST 4521 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 130 0211823140031 BARTON & JENNIFER SORENSEN 4527 MEDINA LAKE DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 131 0211823140032 ROBERT K & DARLENE S LARSON 4450 MAPLE LEAF CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 132 0211823140034 TIMOTHY UNTERSEHER 840 FOX PATH CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 133 0211823140035 QING HUANG 830 FOX PATH CT MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 134 0211823140047 YULIAN YANG & JIANBO YANG 4595 FOXBERRY DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 135 0211823410005 MICHAEL L MINOR 4290 FOXBERRY CT MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 136 0211823410007 DEREK J & MICHELLE M CHERNE 4230 FOXBERRY CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 137 0211823410012 DALLAS GLIDEWELL 4295 FOXBERRY CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 138 0211823410018 RAM MULAY & SHIVANI MULAY 800 FOXBERRY FARMS RD HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 139 0211823410024 HUMERA MUJIR & IBRAHIM MUJIR 4375 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 140 0211823410034 CHRIS & VICKI RAHN 900 SUNSET CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 141 0211823410036 STEVEN G & ELAINE M VALERIUS 935 SUNSET CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 142 0211823410039 JAMES & BETHANY SEXTON 4315 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 143 0211823410043 FOUZIA LASHARI 4255 SHOREWOOD TR MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 144 0211823410044 VIDYOTHAM REDDI & SHIVANI PANDIT4225 SHOREWOOD TR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 145 0211823410046 JOHN PATRICK PICKERING\LORI J DALR875 FOX PATH CT HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 146 0211823410049 LAURA HOMCHIK 845 FOX PATH CT MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 147 0211823420014 NATHAN HARTY & TENA HARTY 1100 FOXTAIL DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 148 0211823420015 MONDELL 1115 FOXTAIL DR MEDINA MN 55340 $1,494.28 149 0211823420017 ELIZABETH M BERG 1165 FOXTAIL DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 150 0211823420018 CHRISTINE & RICHARD ANDRES 1195 FOXTAIL DR HAMEL MN 55340 $1,494.28 224,142.49 Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 6 Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 7 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Erin Barnhart, Finance Director DATE: April 11, 2023 SUBJ: Resident Request for Exemption - Road Assessment Background Mr. Jack Litowsky received notice of the proposed Medina Highlands & Clydesdale Trail E road assessment. He resides at 100 Clydesdale Trail, # 111 and called on March 21st requesting an exemption to the proposed road assessment. He expressed he would be unable to submit anything in writing or attend in person. I indicated to Mr. Litowsky that I would take down his statement for submittal to City Council. I informed Mr. Litowsky that a hardship (if eligible) per City of Medina code would defer the assessment rather than remove or grant exemption of the assessment. Mr. Litowsky’s Statement “I am 85 years old. I am handicapped, I have no car, I am confined to my unit, losing my eyesight, and have had one leg amputated.” Hardship Eligibility per City of Medina Code Section 715 Section 715.01. Purpose of Deferment. The city council hereby finds that there is a need to establish a procedure permitting deferment of special assessments pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 435.193-435.195 in cases where immediate payment thereof would create a hardship for qualifying elderly or disabled homeowners. To be eligible to apply for a deferment, a person must be the owner of homestead property and be 65 years of age or older or retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability, and it must be a hardship to make the assessment payments. For this purpose, a permanent and total disability is a medically verified condition which is permanent, and which totally prevents the individual from working at an occupation that affords the person an income. Section 715.03. Application. Application for deferred assessment shall be made to the city administrator upon forms prescribed by Hennepin County and by the city and shall contain true statements of such information as is requested thereon. Application for deferment of assessments beginning in any year shall be made by September 15 of the preceding year. Section 715.05. Approval of Deferment. The city administrator shall recommend approval or disapproval of each application on the basis of whether payment of the assessment would constitute a hardship. No person shall be deemed to have a hardship unless his or her income, as determined by the applicant’s most recent federal or state income tax return, is no more than 60 percent of the median income for the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area, as determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, adjusted for family size, and the average annual Agenda Item #9E 2 payment for all assessments on the property exceeds 1-1/2 percent of the applicant’s adjusted gross income. For this purpose, the average annual payment of assessments shall be the aggregate of all assessments levied against the property, excluding interest, divided by the term of years of each assessment. No person shall be considered to have a hardship if he or she participates in the Minnesota senior citizen property tax deferral program. Following receipt of the city administrator’s recommendation, the city council shall act upon each application. Staff Recommendation Staff is not making a recommendation. Staff is passing along the request as indicated to Mr. Litowsky. Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 Member __ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xx RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS ACCORDING TO FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ORDERING THE MEDINA HIGHLANDS AREA IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to previous actions by the city council, city staff has prepared plans and specifications for the mill and overlay for the Medina Highlands Area Improvement Project and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval. WHEREAS, ten days’ mailed notice and two weeks’ published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held on April 18, 2023, at which hearing all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby adopted. 2. The above-described improvement is necessary, cost effective and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 3. The improvement is hereby ordered as proposed. Dated: April 18, 2023 Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member __ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: - and the following voted against same: - Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 Member __ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xx RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR MEDINA HIGHLANDS AND CLYDESDALE TRAIL EAST IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the city clerk has, with the assistance of the public works director and the city finance director, prepared a proposed roll regarding the assessment of benefited properties for a portion of the cost of the Medina Highlands and Clydesdale Trail East improvement project which consists of mill and overlay improvements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to notice as required by law, the city council conducted a public hearing on April 18, 2023, with regard to the proposed assessments and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute a special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The special assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 7 years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2024 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.00% per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2023. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to November 15, 2023, pay the whole of the assessment on such property to the city finance director, with interest accrued to the date of payment, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days of the adoption of the assessment. Thereafter, any owner may pay to the city finance director the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The city clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this resolution to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 2 Dated: April 18, 2023. Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member __ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: - and the following voted against same: - Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 3 MAP ID PID FEE OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS ASSESSMENT 1 1211823140074 KENNETH J MOOS 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 106 $492.06 2 1211823140082 CHARLES ANDERSON 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 114 $492.06 3 1211823140085 RONALD H VESCIO 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 117 $492.06 4 1211823140087 MARGARET M ELSNER 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 119 $492.06 5 1211823140094 RONALD A SCHULTE 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 126 $492.06 6 1211823140102 MICHELE STENDAL 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 205 $492.06 7 1211823140106 DANA WELD 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 209 $492.06 8 1211823140108 DAVID E MILLER 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 211 $492.06 9 1211823140109 ROSEANNE MCCOLLINS 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 212 $492.06 10 1211823140113 SANDRA DURAN 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 216 $492.06 11 1211823140122 SALLY NORDBY & DAVID NORDBY 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 225 $492.06 12 1211823140126 MARGARET SHINEHOUSE 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 229 $492.06 13 1211823140128 LEONARD & LORRAINE WAGNER 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 302 $492.06 14 1211823140130 GREGORY R EBERT 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 304 $492.06 15 1211823140134 BEVERLY JEAN METZ 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 308 $492.06 16 1211823140141 MILDRED A KRUSE ARNESON 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 315 $492.06 17 1211823140146 SHIRLEY A FLACHMAN 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 320 $492.06 18 1211823140149 DAVID A SMITH 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 323 $492.06 19 1211823140154 KATHRYN S FLAGG 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 328 $492.06 20 1211823140073 LYNNE M MATESKI 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 105 $492.06 21 1211823140076 FINNAMORE FAMILY TRUST 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 108 $492.06 22 1211823140081 DAVE STANGLER 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 113 $492.06 23 1211823140088 MAVIS FERN 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 120 $492.06 24 1211823140089 LEE THONI & PHYLLIS RITCHIE 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 121 $492.06 25 1211823140093 ELEANOR J DEGMAN TRUSTEE 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 125 $492.06 26 1211823140096 PHYLLIS ALLISON 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 128 $492.06 27 1211823140101 JANET D BRATKOVICH 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 204 $492.06 28 1211823140110 BARBARA A ST MARTIN 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 213 $492.06 29 1211823140115 DONALD A & JEAN A JOHANSEN 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 218 $492.06 30 1211823140117 JAMES & LINDA LORENCE/LORENCE JO 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 220 $492.06 31 1211823140119 LAUREL L METZLER/MARMETZ LLC 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 222 $492.06 32 1211823140121 PETER A TADDY 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 224 $492.06 33 1211823140124 ELIZABETH LARSON 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 227 $492.06 34 1211823140132 BARBARA J PETERSON 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 306 $492.06 35 1211823140133 WILLIAM J BRAUSEN 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 307 $492.06 36 1211823140136 IRENE ANDERSON 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 310 $492.06 37 1211823140148 SHARRIE A FLAIG 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 322 $492.06 38 1211823140150 DARLENE M HESSE 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 324 $492.06 39 1211823140152 ROBERT K & MARY J GARRITY 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 326 $492.06 40 1211823140153 KATHLEEN C POULIOT 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 327 $492.06 41 1211823140155 KAREN DICKINSON 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 329 $492.06 42 1211823140069 SANDRA LEE NELSON 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 101 $492.06 43 1211823140070 JONATHAN PAUL STRANDJORD 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 102 $492.06 44 1211823140072 DUANE C WOSJE/CAROL E WOSJE 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 104 $492.06 45 1211823140075 DOUGLAS E RANALLO 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 107 $492.06 46 1211823140077 ARLENE B HARRISON 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 109 $492.06 47 1211823140079 JACK LITOWSKY 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 111 $492.06 48 1211823140090 SALLY MOEN 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 122 $492.06 49 1211823140092 RALPH & VIRGINIA CARTER 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 124 $492.06 50 1211823140095 BARBARA KLINER 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 127 $492.06 Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 4 MAP ID PID FEE OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS ASSESSMENT 51 1211823140097 LAVONNE SIRIANNI 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 129 $492.06 52 1211823140099 BARBARA MEYER 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 202 $492.06 53 1211823140103 MARRAN MCNULTY 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 206 $492.06 54 1211823140104 JAN MARTIN 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 207 $492.06 55 1211823140112 AVALON O EIDEN 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 215 $492.06 56 1211823140116 CARL & MARILYN SHUTTS 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 219 $492.06 57 1211823140118 FRANCIS P BUNCH 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 221 $492.06 58 1211823140123 JAMES & CLARICE LAMBRECHT 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 226 $492.06 59 1211823140131 DEAN SCHUENKE 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 305 $492.06 60 1211823140135 SHARON SAUER 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 309 $492.06 61 1211823140137 NORMAN C BEARDSLEY/SUSAN M BEA 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 311 $492.06 62 1211823140139 BARBARA L BIRO 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 313 $492.06 63 1211823140144 CYNTHIA & ROGER HURD 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 318 $492.06 64 1211823140151 JAMES R ORR 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 325 $492.06 65 1211823140071 SUSAN R WEBBER 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 103 $492.06 66 1211823140078 LESLIE OSTREM 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 110 $492.06 67 1211823140080 HERBERT & ROCHELLE HEICHERT 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 112 $492.06 68 1211823140083 CHARLES & PATRICIA PAULSON 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 115 $492.06 69 1211823140084 JOHANNA A LAMMERS 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 116 $492.06 70 1211823140086 DONNA M MAUNU 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 118 $492.06 71 1211823140091 DONALD H & SHARRON E EHLEN 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 123 $492.06 72 1211823140098 CHARLES KLEINSTEUBER 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 201 $492.06 73 1211823140100 MICHELLE PIERSON 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 203 $492.06 74 1211823140105 RICHARD SCHEARROW 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 208 $492.06 75 1211823140107 VERNA J LUNDIN 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 210 $492.06 76 1211823140111 JOHN M RUHA 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 214 $492.06 77 1211823140114 JUDY & WARREN PILLSBURY 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 217 $492.06 78 1211823140120 SUE ANN SCHNEIDER 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 223 $492.06 79 1211823140125 ANTHONY RIVERA/SHERI RIVERA 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 228 $492.06 80 1211823140127 RICHARD B LASH 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 301 $492.06 81 1211823140129 KEITH & SHARRON WIGGINS 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 303 $492.06 82 1211823140138 ROBERT & LISA ANONEN 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 312 $492.06 83 1211823140140 SINCLAIR & ETHELYN BEIREIS 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 314 $492.06 84 1211823140142 MARLENE LAU 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 316 $492.06 85 1211823140143 JOYCE J PEGORS 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 317 $492.06 86 1211823140145 LOIS H MAREK 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 319 $492.06 87 1211823140147 BARBARA J KELLY 100 CLYDESDALE TRL 321 $492.06 88 1211823110041 STEPHEN & MARY PAT BYRNES 3850 LINDEN DR W $492.06 89 1211823110051 RICHARD E EDIN 3840 LINDEN DR E $492.06 90 1211823110060 VATSAL & DIPTI MUNSHI 3833 LINDEN DR E $492.06 91 1211823110062 BONNIE J DOWSETT 3865 LINDEN DR W $492.06 92 1211823110066 JAMES J & JUDITH A BAKER 3857 LINDEN DR W $492.06 93 1211823110067 TIMOTHY & MARY MURRAY 3855 LINDEN DR W $492.06 94 1211823140026 DARYL DOORENBOS 3826 LINDEN DR E $492.06 95 1211823140029 GARY/SHEILA LANGER 3820 LINDEN DR E $492.06 96 1211823140030 PAUL DEJUTE & SUSAN DEJUTE 3818 LINDEN DR E $492.06 97 1211823140036 TOM & AMY SWANSON 3706 LILAC DR $492.06 98 1211823140038 DAVID R SCHONEBAUM 3702 LILAC DR $492.06 99 1211823140039 REBECCA DEE HELD 3701 LILAC DR $492.06 100 1211823140040 WILLIAM/MICHELLE JARVEY 3703 LILAC DR $492.06 Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 5 MAP ID PID FEE OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS ASSESSMENT 101 1211823140046 SHARON/MARK CHRISTOPHER 3715 LILAC DR $492.06 102 1211823140048 JOHN/DIANE STEFFAN 3719 LILAC DR $492.06 103 1211823140050 CAROL ANN SWENSON 3723 LINDEN DR W $492.06 104 1211823140052 FREDERICK & JULIA FAXVOG 3727 LINDEN DR W $492.06 105 1211823140059 JAMES C MCCKINNEY 3825 LINDEN DR E $492.06 106 1211823140061 JEFFERY JOHN GRATES 3716 LILAC DR $492.06 107 1211823140064 MARY K LOCHER 3720 LILAC DR $492.06 108 1211823110043 THOMAS FRETHEIM 3854 LINDEN DR W $492.06 109 1211823110047 EDWARD & WANDA SWEENEY 3848 LINDEN DR $492.06 110 1211823110053 JEAN QUALE 3836 LINDEN DR E $492.06 111 1211823110057 JEFFREY SCHERBER 3839 LINDEN DR E $492.06 112 1211823110061 WENDY SONDAG TAFT 3831 LINDEN DR E $492.06 113 1211823110064 MICHAEL HAGLUND 3861 LINDEN DR W $492.06 114 1211823110068 BARRY R & ROCHELLE I KRUPP 3853 LINDEN DR W $492.06 115 1211823140028 SHIRLEY J WIKNER TRUSTEE 3822 LINDEN DR E $492.06 116 1211823140032 RICHARD & PATRICIA BROOKS 3714 LILAC DR $492.06 117 1211823140042 PHYLLIS J CAVANAGH 3707 LILAC DR $492.06 118 1211823140058 GREGORY L BRETTINGEN 3827 LINDEN DR E $492.06 119 1211823140063 CHARLES W LUND/DIANE M LUND 3849 LINDEN DR W $492.06 120 1211823110044 HARLAN PERRON & NANCY PERRON 3856 LINDEN DR W $492.06 121 1211823110049 JOSEPH & JOAN MCCUSKER 3844 LINDEN DR E $492.06 122 1211823110054 JOAN M HAUER REVOCABLE TRUST 3834 LINDEN DR E $492.06 123 1211823110059 STUART & MARY MOGELSON 3835 LINDEN DR E $492.06 124 1211823110065 MARY/CRAIG ALSHOUSE 3859 LINDEN DR W $492.06 125 1211823140031 SHAHRAM SALIMY 3816 LINDEN DR E $492.06 126 1211823140034 PATRICIA/CARL NIEMI 3710 LILAC DR $492.06 127 1211823140041 LOLA M PALMER 3705 LILAC DR $492.06 128 1211823140043 THOMAS A NELSON 3709 LILAC DR $492.06 129 1211823140044 MARILYN A NYGARD 3711 LILAC DR $492.06 130 1211823140051 ROBERT HELGREN 3725 LINDEN DR W $492.06 131 1211823140054 ANN M GARLAND 3731 LINDEN DR W $492.06 132 1211823140060 ROBERT W & JENNIFER J LARSON 3823 LINDEN DR E $492.06 133 1211823110042 CORRINE J PULVERMACHER TRUST 3852 LINDEN DR W $492.06 134 1211823110045 PATRICIA A BORGERSON 3858 LINDEN DR W $492.06 135 1211823110046 JAMES & BONNIE BEMIS 3860 LINDEN DR W $492.06 136 1211823110048 JON & GRETCHEN HERSCH 3846 LINDEN DR E $492.06 137 1211823110050 DANIEL & JANA SCHROEDER 3842 LINDEN DR E $492.06 138 1211823110052 PAMELA KIRKPATRICK 3838 LINDEN DR E $492.06 139 1211823110055 JAMES J HEIMERL 3832 LINDEN DR E $492.06 140 1211823110056 ROBERT & CONNIE LENZMEIER 3830 LINDEN DR E $492.06 141 1211823110058 JAMES I PEDERSON 3837 LINDEN DR E $492.06 142 1211823110063 WENDY S STROMBECK 3863 LINDEN DR W $492.06 143 1211823140025 CYNTHIA L AMUNDSON/MICHAEL J AM 3828 LINDEN DR E $492.06 144 1211823140027 JAMES W & GAIL B LAPPEN 3824 LINDEN DR E $492.06 145 1211823140033 WALTER P SWIERK 3712 LILAC DR $492.06 146 1211823140035 ALAN J GRUNDEI 3708 LILAC DR $492.06 147 1211823140037 TODD JACKSON & JILL JACKSON 3704 LILAC DR $492.06 148 1211823140045 GLENN & MAHLER 3713 LILAC DR $492.06 149 1211823140047 TOM & NANNETTE CASSIDY 3717 LILAC DR $492.06 150 1211823140049 LUANN JOHNSON & REID JOHNSON 3721 LILAC DR $492.06 151 1211823140053 ROGER W & PEGGY A LEDEBOER 3729 LINDEN DR W $492.06 152 1211823140055 VASILIOS KOTTAS 3733 LINDEN DR W $492.06 153 1211823140056 PAULETTE F MASSA 3735 LINDEN DR W $492.06 154 1211823140057 SEAMUS J LAFFERTY 3829 LINDEN DR E $492.06 155 1211823140062 EILEEN S ROHLAND 3851 LINDEN DR W $492.06 $76,269.56 Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 6 Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 7 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jim Stremel, City Engineer DATE: April 12, 2023 MEETING: April 18, 2023 SUBJECT: 2023 Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project – Conduct Assessment Hearing, Adopt Assessment Roll, Award Project Background: The Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation project was initiated as a part of the City’s capital improvement planning and is intended to replace deteriorating infrastructure within this corridor. The proposed project consists of a pavement mill/overlay of the pavement surface along Clydesdale Trail from roughly 100 feet east of the City’s public works driveway to the intersection at County Road 101. There are also sections of the existing concrete curb, spot bituminous trail repairs, the replacement of a section of bituminous trail along CR 101, and pedestrian curb ramps that would be replaced with the project. On February 7, 2023 the City Council adopted a resolution setting the date to hold the Improvement Hearing on February 21, 2023. Since that time, the City received bids for the project and the City Council passed a resolution to hold the Assessment Hearing on April 18, 2023. Project Bidding: Seven bids were received with the apparent low bid submitted by GMH Asphalt Corporation in the amount of $337,625.81; the engineer’s estimate was $430,246.75. A summary of the project bid abstract is enclosed. Project Cost, Funding & Assessment Review: With the project now bid and including the low bid amount into the project cost calculation, the total estimated project cost is $447,000 which includes a 5% contingency and indirect costs for legal, engineering, administrative, and financing. The project costs can further be split into the portion for the street work $378,000 and the trail/pedestrian improvements $69,000. The project is proposed to be funded through special assessments to the benefiting properties and City street funds. Based on the City’s Assessment Policy, the estimated amount proposed to be assessed to benefitting property owners is 50% of the street work project cost or $189,000. The trail/pedestrian improvements are not proposed to be assessed. Agenda Item #9F 2 Next Steps: The next steps for the City Council at the April 18th meeting are to conduct the Assessment Hearing, consider adopting the assessment roll, and consider awarding the project. Assuming the City Council awards the project, construction would likely begin in May and be substantially complete by early July. Once a pre-construction meeting is held, a more detailed construction schedule will be available. City Council Action Requested: 1. Conduct the Assessment Hearing 2. Consider adopting the Assessment Roll by resolution 3. Consider adopting the resolution accepting the lowest responsible bid and awarding the contract to GMH Asphalt Corporation in the amount of $337,625.81. PROJECT: Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project OWNER: City of Medina, MN WSB PROJECT NO.: 021547-000 BIDS RECEIVED ONLINE: Friday, March 24, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. Local Time Contractor Bid Bond (5%) Add. No. 1 Rec'd Grand Total Bid 1 GMH Asphalt Corporation X X $337,625.81 2 Valley Paving, Inc.X X $345,680.75 3 Northwest Asphalt, Inc.X X $351,801.58 4 Omann Contracting Companies, Inc.X X $354,843.91 5 Asphalt Surface Technologies Corporation X X $359,207.98 6 OMG Midwest, Inc. dba MN Paving & Materials X X $362,369.06 7 Bituminous Roadways, Inc.X X $369,070.20 Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost $430,246.75 James L. Stremel, PE, City Engineer BID TABULATION SUMMARY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct tabulation of the bids as received on March 24, 2023. 021547-000 CST Bid Tab Summary-032423 Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 Member __ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-xx RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR CLYDESDALE TRAIL PAVEMENT REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the city clerk has, with the assistance of the public works director and the city finance director, prepared a proposed roll regarding the assessment of benefited properties for a portion of the cost of the Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation improvement project which consists of mill and overlay improvements; and WHEREAS, pursuant to notice as required by law, the city council conducted a public hearing on April 18, 2023, with regard to the proposed assessments and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the city of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute a special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The special assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first installment to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2024 and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.00% per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2023. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to November 15, 2023, pay the whole of the assessment on such property to the city finance director, with no interest accrued to the date of payment. Thereafter, any owner may pay to the city finance director the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The city clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this resolution to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 2 Dated: April 18, 2023. Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member __ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: - and the following voted against same: - Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 3 MAP ID PIN FEE OWNER ASSESSMENT 1 1211823130042 TARGET CORPORATION 300 Clydesdale Tr HAMEL MN 55340 $41,539.98 2 1211823140067 SOR REAL ESTATE LLC 5145 County Road 101 HAMEL MN 55340 $7,338.07 3 1211823140156 SOR REAL ESTATE LLC 212 Clydesdale Tr HAMEL MN 55340 $4,937.51 4 1211823240025 MEDINA MOTOR INN 400 Highway 55 HAMEL MN 55340 $6,794.31 6 1211823240029 CITY OF MEDINA 490 Clydesdale Tr HAMEL MN 55340 $554.74 7 1211823130036 PJ NORMAN LLC 345 Clydesdale Tr HAMEL MN 55340 $4,766.34 8 1211823240011 THOMAS & MARGARET DYKHOFF 552 Highway 55 HAMEL MN 55340 $3,930.56 9 1211823240023 MIDWESTERN PROPERTIES LLC 550 Clydesdale Tr HAMEL MN 55340 $10,521.78 10 1211823240030 MEDINA RECREATIONS INC 500 Highway 55 HAMEL MN 55340 $19,629.37 11 1211823130035 CLYDESDALE MARKET LLC 340 Clydesdale Tr HAMEL MN 55340 $2,922.44 12 1211823130041 VALVOLINE LLC 215 Clydesdale Tr HAMEL MN 55340 $3,533.14 13 1211823130044 CLYDESDALE MARKET LLC 302 Clydesdale Tr HAMEL MN 55340 $11,820.36 14 1211823230059 CITY OF MEDINA 600 Clydesdale Tr HAMEL MN 55340 $27,539.00 16 1211823240031 MEDINA LEASED HSG ASCTS I LP 501 Clydesdale Tr HAMEL MN 55340 $14,957.45 17 1211823130037 CLYDESDALE MARKET LLC 325 Clydesdale Tr HAMEL MN 55340 $4,581.07 19 1211823130043 WELLS FARGO BANK NTL ASCN 330 Clydesdale Tr HAMEL MN 55340 $2,891.29 20 1211823140023 HOLIDAY STATIONSTORES INC 200 Highway 55 HAMEL MN 55340 $7,687.50 21 1211823230058 CHERYL LYNN DYKHOFF $2,018.94 22 1211823240022 CHERYL LYNN DYKHOFF $3,103.99 23 1211823240024 MEDINA RECREATIONS INC 500 Highway 55 HAMEL MN 55340 $7,932.18 $189,000.00 ADDRESS Resolution No. 2023-xx April 18, 2023 4 Resolution No. ________ April 18, 2023 Member ___________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. _______ RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING THE CONTRACT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 2023 Clydesdale Trail Pavement Rehabilitation Project, the improvement of Clydesdale Trail from 100 feet east of the City’s public works driveway to County Road 101 by reconstruction of the roadway pavement surface layer, spot concrete curb replacement, and trail repair, bids were received, opened electronically, and tabulated according to the law, and the following seven bids were received complying with the advertisement: Company Grand Total Bid GMH Asphalt Corporation $337,625.81 Valley Paving, Inc. $345,680.75 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $351,801.58 Omann Contracting Companies, Inc. $354,843.91 Asphalt Surface Technologies Corporation $359,207.98 OMG Midwest, Inc. dba MH Paving & Materials $362,369.06 Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $369,070.20 AND WHEREAS, it appears that GMH Asphalt Corporation of Chaska, MN is the lowest responsible bidder based on the Grand Total Bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with GMH Asphalt Corporation in the name of the City of Medina for the improvement of a city roadway on Clydesdale Trail from 100 feet east of the City’s public works driveway to County Road 101 by reconstruction of the roadway pavement surface layer, spot concrete curb replacement, and trail repair, according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Administrator. 2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Resolution No. ________ April 18, 2023 2 Adopted by the Council on April 18, 2023. By: _______________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: By: ___________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ___________ and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Cates Industrial Park Page 1 of 15 April 18, 2023 Rezoning, PrePlat, Site Plan Review City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: April 13, 2023 MEETING: April 18, 2023 City Council SUBJECT: Cates Industrial Park – Oppidan Investments – Preliminary Plat and Site Plan Review – PID 04-118-23-14-0004 Summary of Request Oppidan Investments has requested land use approvals for development of approximately 310,000 square feet of warehouse/light industrial/office buildings on approximately 30 acres east of Willow Drive, north of Chippewa Road. On July 19, 2022, the City Council granted conditional approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide the subject site for Business development and to amend the staging/growth designation of the property to the 2020 staging period. During the summer of 2022, the applicant also submitted three potential concept plans and requested feedback from the City on how development could be laid out on the site. Minutes from these discussions are attached for reference. The following applications have been submitted for review: 1) Rezoning to Business (B) zoning district 2) Preliminary Plat to subdivide subject site into two lots 3) Site Plan Review for proposed construction The subject site is predominantly farmland. A home and farm buildings are located in the southwest portion of the site. There are eight small wetlands throughout the property, and the total area of regulated wetlands on the site is approximately 0.75 acres. The aerial at the top of the following page depicts the subject site and surrounding land uses as follows: • West of site – Graphic Packaging and Twinco – zoned Business • Northwest of site – Business guiding – currently farmed • East of the site – rural homes – guided FDA and zoned RR-UR • South of the site – Business guiding • North of the site – agricultural/rural – guided FD Environmental Assessment Worksheet – Negative Declaration Chapter 4410 of Minnesota Rules regulates Environmental Review and requires mandatory completion of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for development of 300,000 square feet or more of warehouse/light industrial space within a city of Medina’s size. MEMORANDUM Future Land Use: Business (pending) Staging/Growth: 2020 (pending) Current Zoning: RR-UR Proposed Zoning: Business (B) Gross Area: 30 acres Net Area: 28 acres Proposed construction: 310,000 s.f. Agenda Item #9G Cates Industrial Park Page 2 of 15 April 18, 2023 Rezoning, PrePlat, Site Plan Review City Council Meeting The purpose of an EAW is to develop an analysis and overview of the potential impacts of the development, determine if the project will cause any significant environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated through normal review processes, and provide information for planning and design. An EAW was completed at the end of 2021 and reviewed by relevant agencies in early 2022. The EAW was completed based on the applicant’s original request for a larger project that included the 40 acres north of the subject site and a total floor area of approximately 665,000 square feet. The City Council adopted the Findings of Fact and Record of Decision on the EAW on March 1, 2022 and determined that the project does not necessitate an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The negative declaration on the need for an EIS found that standard review processes would be sufficient for environmental review purposes, provided the comments of the relevant agencies are addressed during the formal process. Cates Industrial Park Page 3 of 15 April 18, 2023 Rezoning, PrePlat, Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Rezoning Request The Applicant proposes to rezone the subject property to the Business (B) zoning district. The subject site is currently zoned Rural Residential-Urban Reserve, which is consistent with the Future Development Area designation that applied to the property prior to approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment in June 2022. A rezoning would be anticipated to implement the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The City’s practice is to zone property intended for Business development as either Business (B) or Business Park (BP). The purpose statement of each district is as follows: “Business (B) Purpose. The purpose of the Business (B) district is to provide for a zoning district for a mix of office, high quality light industrial, and larger-scale retail and service uses with proximity to arterial roadways. Development shall include high quality and attractive building materials and architectural design as well as extensive landscaping in order to limit impacts on surrounding land uses, and shall be integrated and coordinated in a way to most efficiently utilize site improvements and to protect the natural environment.” “Business Park (BP) Purpose. The purpose of the Business Park (BP) district is to provide an attractive, high quality business park primarily for office, high quality manufacturing and assembly, and non-retail uses in developments which provide a harmonious transition to residential development and neighborhoods by: 1) conducting all business activities and essentially all storage inside buildings, 2) consisting of low profile, high quality and attractive buildings which blend in with the environment, 3) providing open space, quality landscaping and berming which achieve a park-like setting; 4) including berming and buffering of parking, loading docks and other similar functions; and 5) protecting and enhancing the natural environment.” Generally speaking, the BP district is more restrictive in terms of allowed uses and building height than the B district because it is intended to apply to property more proximate from arterial roadways and more proximate with residential development. The subject property is proximate to Highway 55, an arterial roadway, and other property zoned B to the west. Property to the north and east is currently rural residential, but has been guided Future Development Area. The B district was contemplated during review of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Concept Plans and staff believes the zoning to B is appropriate based on the proximity to Highway 55. Staff recommends approval of the proposed rezoning to the B district. The remaining staff report reviews the request within the context of the B district. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission discussed the proposed rezoning to the B district. Following discussion, the consensus of the Planning Commission was that the B district was appropriate based upon proximity to Highway 55, adjacent B zoning, and likely surrounding uses in the future. Cates Industrial Park Page 4 of 15 April 18, 2023 Rezoning, PrePlat, Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Preliminary Plat The applicant proposes to subdivide the existing parcel into two lots and two outlots. Outlot A is proposed east of Lot 2, and contains the stormwater pond for the development. Outlot B is located north of the new proposed orientation of Cates Ranch Drive. The intent for Outlot B is to be able to combine with property north of the new street orientation. The following table compares the proposed lots with the dimensional standards of the B district. The lots significantly exceed the minimum standards of the B district. B District Requirement Lot 1 (west lot) Lot 2 (east lot) Minimum Lot Area 3 acres 7.68 acres 11.71 acres Minimum Lot Width 175 feet 488 feet 470 feet Minimum Lot Depth 175 feet 760 feet 1270 feet Transportation, Streets, Right-of-way and Access The subject site has frontage on two public roadways, Willow Drive to the west and Chippewa Road to the south. Cates Ranch Drive, a private road, is located to the north. The applicant proposes to realign Cates Ranch Drive further south to align with the existing Twinco/Romax driveway west of Willow Drive. The applicant proposes one access to Willow Drive, two accesses to Chippewa Road, and one access to Cates Ranch Drive. The applicant originally had proposed a 2nd access to Cates Ranch Drive, but combined accesses upon recommendation of staff. The Site Plan shows only one access, but it should be noted that the remaining civil plans have not yet been updated and still show the 2nd access point. A traffic analysis was conducted at the time of the EAW and reviewed at the time of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The traffic analysis contemplated the larger 665,000 s.f. development which included the 40 acres to the north. The traffic analysis identified the need for a series of improvements to adjacent streets to support the development. The applicant proposes to construct the improvements, which include: 1) Right-turn lanes into most site accesses 2) Left-turn lane from Willow Drive to Chippewa Road 3) Right-turn lane from Willow Drive to Chippewa Road 4) Expanded left-turn lane from Willow Drive onto Highway 55 Cates Industrial Park Page 5 of 15 April 18, 2023 Rezoning, PrePlat, Site Plan Review City Council Meeting With the improvements noted above, the traffic analysis projected that there should not be issues on local streets for most of the day with the larger development. The primary issue was projected at peak evening rush hour. The traffic analysis found that at the p.m. peak, it is projected that vehicles waiting to turn left onto Highway 55 may back-up through the intersection of Chippewa Road and may need to wait two light cycles to clear the intersection. If traffic is backed-up at Willow Drive, staff assumed that some drivers would likely find alternatives and reviewed potential impacts to other intersections. Staff assumed up to 40% of the traffic may instead utilize Chippewa Road east to Arrowhead Drive as an alternative during the p.m. peak. If this occurred, it improves operations at the Willow Drive/Hwy 55 intersection and did not appear to cause issues on Chippewa Road and Arrowhead Drive to Highway 55. With the smaller development of 310,000 square feet, less back-up would be anticipated on Willow Drive if the necessary improvements noted above were provided in connection with the development. In the long-term, the analysis found that expansion of Highway 55 to two-lanes in each direction through the Willow Drive intersection would result in acceptable movements at the Willow Drive and Highway 55 intersection even with the larger development. Expansion of Highway 55 has not yet been programmed by MnDOT. As such, the traffic analysis reviewed whether improvements to the local transportation network could be implemented to function without assuming an expansion to Highway 55. The applicant proposes to construct the improvements identified within the traffic analysis in connection with this proposed development. With the reduced scale of this development from the when the traffic analysis was conducted, the traffic impacts would be less than originally contemplated. MnDOT has requested installation of a traffic monitoring camera as a condition of the development. This would allow review of the operations of the intersection and may allow for adjustments to the timing of the light. The applicant proposes an access from the north which is partially located within an Outlot which currently contains a private road shared by two properties to the east. Access for this site was contemplated from this outlot when the sites were subdivided in the 1990s. The owner of the subject site also has fee ownership of the outlot, but it is subject to certain agreements with another owner. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant provide evidence that they are legally able to make the changes to the private road. Staff also recommends that public right-of-way be required to connect with property to the east of the subject site. The applicant has suggested that his right-of-way could be provided over the Outlot containing the private road. Staff believes this may be an acceptable location, provided the applicant provides evidence that such right-of-way can be provided and not be encumbered for future use. Staff does not recommend opening a public road at this time, since it would only serve this subject site. However, securing the right-of-way is important to ensure potential access for future development to the east. Cates Industrial Park Page 6 of 15 April 18, 2023 Rezoning, PrePlat, Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Staff recommends that provisions be made to direct truck traffic leaving the site to Willow Drive rather than Chippewa Road. This provides more convenient access for trucks directly to Highway 55 rather than the local street network. The applicant proposes signage within the truck court to direct trucks to the north and “do not enter” signage at the southern access. Wetlands/Floodplains There are eight wetlands on the subject site with a total area of approximately 1.5 acres. The wetlands along the north of the subject site were found to be “incidental,” which means they are not regulated because they were caused by construction of the roadway and ditch. The applicant proposes grading in this area, but these incidental wetlands are not regulated by the wetland conservation act. The applicant proposes approximately 0.02 acre (1000 s.f.) of wetland impact to the south of the eastern building. This impact is subject to Wetland Conservation Act review and replacement if approved. The applicant is also reviewing modifications to the grading plan to further reduce the impacts. No floodplains are identified on the subject site. Sewer/Water/Easements The applicant proposes to extend sewer and water service from the Okalee project to the southeast to serve the site. The applicant proposes to loop this new watermain to Willow Drive, which is an important link for the broader City water system. The property owner has also previously granted to the City an easement for construction of a sanitary sewer lift station north of the subject site. With the exception of the primary watermain loop and a portion of the sewer extension, staff recommends that the sewer and water lines serving the buildings remain privately maintained. The City Engineer has reviewed and provided comments on the utility plans, which staff recommends be addressed. Staff recommends that drainage and utility easements be provided as recommended by the City Engineer, including along the perimeter of lots, over utilities, and over wetland areas. Park Dedication Ordinance Requirements City’s subdivision regulations require up to one of the following amounts to be dedicated for parks, trails, and open space purposes: • 2.8 acres of land to be dedicated – 10% of the buildable property • $250,000-$315,000 (estimated) in-lieu of land dedication – 8% of the pre-developed market value • Combination of land and cash Park and Trails Plan The City’s Parks and Trails plan do not identify future park or trail improvements in the vicinity of the subject site. However, it is important to reevaluate park and trail needs when an amendment is proposed to the Comprehensive Plan. Area of Regulated Wetlands 0.5 acre Proposed impacts 0.02 acre (4%) Parks and Trails Park Improvements N/A Trail construction 2100 linear feet Off-road trail easement 2820 linear feet Cates Industrial Park Page 7 of 15 April 18, 2023 Rezoning, PrePlat, Site Plan Review City Council Meeting The Comprehensive Plan identifies a search area for a neighborhood park to the east of the site but the City has purchased property at 2120 Chippewa Road for this park. The Park Commission did not believe an additional park is likely necessary in the area. The Park Commission reviewed during Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Concept Plan Review and did not recommend requiring park land. The Commission did recommend trail improvements. An excerpt from these discussions is attached. Proposed Improvements The applicant proposes to construct a trail through the open space in the southern portion of the site. The applicant also proposes to construct a trail along the western portion of the site, near Willow Drive. This is approximately 2100 linear feet of trail construction and is shown in pink on the site plan to the right. The applicant also proposes a trail easement through the eastern portion of the site for a potential future trail. This corridor is approximately 1320 linear feet in length. This is shown in yellow. Public Works recommends trail easements 20’ in width. Staff recommends requiring park dedication for the easements which are not abutting the right-of-way, a total area of 1.3 acres. The trail easement abutting right-of-way is provided rather than requiring additional right-of- way. This area would equate to 46% of the maximum dedication which could be required. Staff recommends cash-in-lieu for the remaining dedication amount. The Park Commission was scheduled to review at their March 18 meeting. A quorum of the Commission was not present, but the three members present concurred with staff’s recommendation. Cates Industrial Park Page 8 of 15 April 18, 2023 Rezoning, PrePlat, Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Review Criteria – Subdivision Ordinance The following criteria are described in the subdivision ordinance: “In the case of all subdivisions, the City shall deny approval of a preliminary or final plat if one or a combination of the following findings are made: (a) That the proposed subdivision is in conflict with the general and specific plans of the city, or that the proposed subdivision is premature, as defined in Section 820.28. (b) That the physical characteristics of this site, including but not limited to topography, vegetation, soils, susceptibility to flooding, water storage, drainage and retention, are such that the site is not suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. (c) That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development or does not meet minimum lot size standards. (d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. (e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements are likely to cause serious public health problems. (f) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with public or private streets, easements or right-of-way. As noted above, the proposed lots exceed the dimensional standards of the B district. Staff has recommended a series of conditions below to ensure that necessary infrastructure is provided to support the proposed development. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include the conditions described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy. 2) The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated _______, except as may be modified herein. The design of all improvements shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to construction. 3) Preliminary approval shall be contingent upon a determination by the City Attorney that public right-of-way may be dedicated over Outlot A, Cates Ranch as contemplated in the preliminary plat. Alternatively, the plat shall be updated to provide right-of-way along the north of the subject site as recommended by the City Engineer. 4) The Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City related to Applicant’s responsibility for maintenance of the portion of Cates Ranch Drive which provides access to the site prior to such time that a public street is continued past the site to provide access to other sites. 5) Preliminary approval is contingent upon approval of wetland replacement plan to allow and accommodate proposed street improvements. 6) The Applicant shall satisfy park dedication requirements as determined by the City Council following consultation with the Park Commission. 7) The plat shall dedicate drainage and utility easements as recommended by the City Engineer, including but not limited to, adjacent to the perimeter of the lots, over all water mains and hydrants, public sanitary sewer mains and stormwater improvements, and over all wetland areas. 8) The plat shall be subject to the City’s wetland protection ordinance, including provision of minimum required upland buffers adjacent to wetlands on the site and vegetation Cates Industrial Park Page 9 of 15 April 18, 2023 Rezoning, PrePlat, Site Plan Review City Council Meeting establishment, and the Developer shall execute and record a Wetland Buffer Easement Agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney. 9) The Applicant shall execute and record access easements or other instruments in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney to provide adequate access and circulation between the lots to accommodate the Applicant’s proposed integrated development. 10) The Applicant shall execute and record a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney to describe the responsibility of the property owners to maintain the private stormwater improvements. 11) Sewer and watermain improvements within the lots shall be privately maintained except for the 12” watermain loop and eastern portion sanitary sewer. The Applicant shall update plans to differentiate between public and private utility lines. 12) The Applicant shall address the comments of the City Engineer and the Applicant shall submit updated plans prior to or at the time of final plat application which address the comments. 13) The Applicant shall construct turn lane and street improvements as displayed in the plans received by the City on _________. 14) The Applicant shall provide for traffic camera infrastructure at the Highway 55/Willow Drive traffic signal as recommended by MnDOT. 15) The plat shall be updated to dedicate right-of-way as recommended by the City Engineer. 16) The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements prior to commencing construction in order to ensure completion. 17) The Applicant shall provide title documentation at the time of final plat application and abide by the recommendations of the City Attorney with regard to title matters. 18) The Applicant shall obtain all permits required by Elm Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council and any other relevant agencies. 19) The final plat application shall be filed within 180 days of the date of the resolution granting preliminary approval or the approval shall be considered void unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. 20) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, construction plans, and other relevant documents. Cates Industrial Park Page 10 of 15 April 18, 2023 Rezoning, PrePlat, Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Site Plan Review The following table compares the concept plans with the dimensional standards of the B district. B District Requirement West Building (Lot 1) East Building (Lot 2) Minimum Front Yard Setback (Street) 40 feet 142’ W 40’ S 100’ N 81’ S 100’ N Minimum Rear/Side Yard Setback 25 feet 94’ E 94’ W 442’ E Setback from Residential 100 feet 75’ w/ + buffer 100’ N 100’ N 442’ E Minimum Parking Setbacks Front Yard 25 feet 51’ W 44’ S 200’ N 100’ N 310’ S Rear and Side Yard 15 feet NA 300’ E Residential 100 feet 200’ N 300’ E Maximum Hardcover 70% 53.4% (integrated) 53.4% (integrated) Building Height (sprinkled) 45 feet 32 feet 32 feet The property to the east and north of the subject site is zoned Rural Residential-Urban Reserve and requires increased setbacks and a landscape buffer with 50% opacity. Architectural Design The B zoning district requires the following architectural standards. Materials The following table summarizes the proposed buildings with the requirements of the B district. The full language from the B district is copied below the table. “All exterior building materials shall be durable and meet the following standards: (a) A minimum of 20 percent of the building exterior shall be brick, natural stone, stucco (not Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product), copper, or glass. (b) A maximum of 80 percent may be decorative concrete, split face (rock face) decorative block, and/or decorative pre-cast concrete panels. Decorative concrete shall be color impregnated in earth tones (rather than painted) and shall be patterned to create a high quality terrazzo, brick, stucco, or travertine appearance. (c) A maximum of 20 percent may be wood, metal (excluding copper) or fiber cement lap siding or Exterior Insulation and Finish System or similar product, if used as accent materials which are integrated into the overall building design.” Materials Required Building 1 Building 2 Glass, stone, brick, stucco Min 20% 20% 20% Precast concrete Max 80% 80% 80% Metal, wood, fiber cement Max 20% Cates Industrial Park Page 11 of 15 April 18, 2023 Rezoning, PrePlat, Site Plan Review City Council Meeting The applicant has not provided material calculation for the loading dock elevation or total building calculation. Staff recommends a condition to confirm minimum standards are met for all building facades. Modulation The business districts require: “Buildings shall be designed to avoid long, monotonous building walls. Modulation may include varying building height, building setback, or building materials/design. Generally, a particular building elevation shall include a minimum of one element of modulation per 100 feet of horizontal length, or portion thereof. Alternative architectural or site elements and designs may also be approved by the city which achieve the purpose of reducing the visual impact of long building walls.” The applicant proposes material and color differentiation along the facades. Slight vertical modulation is proposed with different height parapet walls and 3 elements. The buildings are essentially rectangles with no horizonal modulation. Fenestration and Transparency The business districts require: “Building elevations which face a public street shall include generous window coverage. Alternative architectural elements may be approved by the city when windows are not practical.” The west elevation of Building 1 and the north and south elevation of both buildings face streets. Building elevations propose approximately 15% window coverage on the west façade and 5.7% on the north and south facades. Multi-sided Architecture The business districts require: “Any rear or side building elevation which faces a public street or a residential zoning district shall include design and architectural elements of a quality generally associated with a front façade. The elevation(s) shall be compatible with the front building elevation.” Three sides of each building face either a street or residential property. The only side which does not face a street or residential property is the loading dock area. Staff believes the north and south elevations do appear to have less elements than the east and west elevations. Tree Preservation/Landscaping There are existing trees along Willow Drive around the buildings in the southwestern portion of the property but no wooded areas which would be removed by proposed construction. Staff recommends a condition that this removal be quantified to verify compliance with tree replacement requirements. The Business district requires minimum tree planting based on the perimeter of the site and also requires a buffer with an opacity of 0.5 adjacent to residential property along the north and east. Additional plantings are required to meet minimum planting requirements. Staff recommends a condition to update the landscaping plan to providing more plantings. Cates Industrial Park Page 12 of 15 April 18, 2023 Rezoning, PrePlat, Site Plan Review City Council Meeting The B district requires a minimum of 8% of the land area within parking, driveway, and loading dock area to be landscaping. The applicant has updated plans to provide more landscaping areas to meet this requirement. Parking The applicant proposes 216 parking spaces and has indicated that this should be sufficient based upon their experience developing and managing similar buildings. The applicant anticipates predominantly warehouse uses, accounting for approximately 85-90% of the building. Office uses are anticipated at 10-15%. Office space requires more parking, so staff believes it is reasonable to project a 85%/15% split for the sake of parking. The following table describes the City’s minimum parking standards, based upon the applicant’s assumptions. It is important to note that warehousing has the lowest parking requirement of any use in code. This means that if the uses differ significantly from the mix projected by the applicant, the amount of parking would no longer meet minimum requirements. The proposed site plan does leave sufficient area to accommodate additional parking sufficient to meet and exceed minimum City standards. City code allows for setting aside “proof of parking” locations rather than requiring construction of parking which may not be necessary. However, staff believes it is important that the grading and stormwater plans are laid out to allow efficient future construction of the proof of parking locations. Staff recommends a condition that construction plans be updated to show proof-of-parking locations will be accommodated. Staff also recommends a condition that warehousing occupy a minimum of the percentages of each tenant space noted above. Other uses may only be permitted with approval by City staff that sufficient parking will be provided in addition to any approval process required by code. Staff also recommends a condition noting that any shortage of parking is fully based upon the actions of the applicant and shall not be used as justification for any future variance request. Stormwater/Grading The applicant proposes a large stormwater pond to the east of the building. Stormwater is proposed to be reused for lawn/landscape irrigation. The City Engineer has provided comments to be addressed for consistency with stormwater requirements. Staff recommends a condition that these comments be addressed and that the applicant obtain approval from the Elm Creek Watershed. Office Warehouse Building 1 19,762 s.f. (15%) 111,984 s.f. (85%) Building 2 26,524 s.f. (15%) 150,300 s.f. (85%) Total 46,286 s.f. 262,284 s.f. Office 1 stall per 250 s.f. 46,286 s.f. (15%) 185 stalls Warehouse 1 stall per employee or 1 stall per 2000 s.f. 262,284 s.f. (85%) 131 stalls (131 employees max) Total 316 stalls Cates Industrial Park Page 13 of 15 April 18, 2023 Rezoning, PrePlat, Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Loading Docks The B district includes the following requirements related to loading docks: • Limited to 10% of a building perimeter, unless they are located within a loading dock “court” formed by buildings. • Loading docks within 300 feet of a residential zoning district have to be separated from residential property by a building. The applicant proposes all loading docks within the “court” between the buildings. The applicant proposes metal screen walls to further screen the docks. The B district requires that screening walls “shall be constructed of similar materials and design as the principal structure.” Staff believes the design of the screening walls appears to complement the design of the building. Metal is allowed as an accent material for the building. If the structure meets material building standards including the area of the screening walls, staff believes this design is appropriate. The applicant also proposes berms and landscaping south of the loading docks to provide additional screening. Staff recommends that the alignment of the southern access be updated to allow the berm and landscaping to better screen the dock area. Outdoor Storage The B zoning district allows limited outdoor storage areas only with review and approval of a conditional use permit specific to the use. The applicant has not requested outdoor storage areas. Trucks and vehicles are permitted to be parked within loading dock areas. Lighting The City’s lighting ordinance requires light trespass to be no more than 0.6 FC at property lines, and 0.0 FC at residential districts (eastern and northern property line) and that lighting be downcast. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant submit specification and photometrics consistent with this requirement. Mechanical Equipment/Trash/Recycling The B district requires mechanical equipment to be located and screened to not be visible from adjacent property or public streets. Trash and recycling are required to be stored within the principal building, within an accessory structure, or within an enclosed area with similar architecture. Trash and recycling will be accommodated within the buildings. Staff recommends a condition to provide screening details upon building permit application. EV Preparedness The City recently adopted an ordinance which requires applicants to describe Electric Vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure preparedness or implementation is proposed. The code requires the applicant to describe what infrastructure they propose to install and encourages installation, but does not include specific requirements. The applicant has indicated that they will provide conduit for future tenants to install EV infrastructure if they design, but that they do not intend to install EV infrastructure. Cates Industrial Park Page 14 of 15 April 18, 2023 Rezoning, PrePlat, Site Plan Review City Council Meeting Review Criteria/Planning Commission Recommendation The purpose of a Site Plan Review is to review compliance with relevant land use regulations. If the proposed construction meets the requirements, it should be approved. The City can apply conditions as necessary to ensure compliance with City requirements. Staff has identified a series of changes and conditions which are required to met for the proposed plans to meet City requirements. These changes and conditions are mainly related to design and it appears that the site would be able to accommodate necessary changes. Staff is recommending that much of this information be provided prior to action by the City, and other technical conditions can be incorporated into final plans at the time of building permit. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission discussed the Site Plan. Much of the discussion surrounded the architectural design of the buildings. The applicant’s architect described the functional reason that certain design choices were made and provide comparisons to other warehouse projects in the Twin Cities market. The Planning Commission ultimately determined that the proposed architectural design was appropriate and consistent with the requirements of the B district. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Site Plan Review subject to the following conditions: 1) The Site Plan Review shall be contingent upon plat approval. 2) The Site Plan Review shall be contingent upon approval and implementation of the Wetland Replacement Plan related to the proposed wetland impacts. 3) The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated _______ except as may be modified herein. The design of all improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing construction. 4) The Applicant shall abide by the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance, including installation of vegetative buffers, recordation of easements, and installation of signage. 5) The Applicant shall update grading and stormwater plans to show that construction of proof- of-parking areas can be accommodated. 6) It is acknowledged that proposed parking is intended to accommodate warehousing as the principal and predominant use. Other uses shall not exceed 15% of the structures unless the applicant has provided evidence satisfactory to City staff, that adequate parking exists for the use. 7) It is acknowledged that the amount of parking, anticipated site layout, and projected uses on the site result from direct action of the Applicant for the sake of any future variance request. 8) The Applicant shall update the landscaping plans to provide 0.5 opacity to the north and east of the structures, meet the minimum planting standards of the B district, and provide required tree replacement. 9) The Applicant shall submit exterior lighting specifications and photometrics. Light trespass shall not exceed 0.0 FC at the northern and eastern property line or 0.6 FC at other property lines. All parking lot and landscape lighting shall be downcast and shielded. 10) Signage shall be subject to review and approval by City staff at the time of application to ensure compliance with the City sign ordinance. 11) The Applicant shall provide evidence that the access point in the Outlot north of the site can be constructed as shown and that public right-of-way can be provided for future roadways and not be encumbered. Cates Industrial Park Page 15 of 15 April 18, 2023 Rezoning, PrePlat, Site Plan Review City Council Meeting 12) The Applicant shall submit building material specification for all facades of the proposed structure and materials shall meet the minimum standards of the B district. 13) The Applicant shall update plans to provide additional berming south of the loading dock courtyard. 14) The Applicant shall provide information on transformer, meter, and HVAC equipment and provide screening measures for review and approval. Any rooftop equipment shall be screened with elements which are compatible with the architectural design of the building, to the satisfaction of City staff. 15) All comments from the Elm Creek Watershed District shall be addressed. 16) All comments from the City Engineer shall be addressed. 17) All trash and recycling shall be stored within the buildings. If storage is proposed outside the building, location and enclosure shall be submitted for review and approved by staff for consistency with B standards prior to storing outside. 18) The Applicant shall update plans to identify bicycle storage areas. 19) The applicant shall provide turn lane improvements for Willow Drive and Chippewa Road as described in the traffic analysis and shall provide for camera monitoring system as recommended by MnDOT. 20) The Applicant shall install signage and take other measures to encourage trucks and most vehicles to utilize the northern shared access. 21) The site plan review approval shall be effective for two years and thereafter shall be considered null and void. Site plan approval for Building 3 shall be effective for four years. 22) The Applicant shall obtain necessary permits from the City, Hennepin County, Elm Creek Watershed, Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Council, and any other relevant agency prior to commencing construction activity on the Property. 23) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, site plan review, and related documents. Potential Action The criteria and considerations for the rezoning, preliminary plat, and site plan review were descried within each section above. Staff would recommend consideration of the rezoning first, since the site plan review is designed assuming a B zoning. If the City Council supports the rezoning to the B district, the following action could be taken: Motion to direct staff to prepare the documents approving the rezoning of the property to the Business zoning district and granting preliminary plat and site plan review approval subject to the conditions noted in the staff report [and with additional changes noted by Council]. Attachments 1. Applicant Narrative 2. Excerpt from 3/14/2023 Planning Commission minutes 3. Excerpt from 5/17/2022 City Council minutes 4. Comment received 5. Engineering Comments 6. Civil Plans 7. Architectural Design CITY OF MEDINA APPLICATION FOR PLANNING CONSIDERATION Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review and Rezoning Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. on behalf of Oppidan and the Cates Family is requesting a Preliminary Plat, Rezoning, and Site Review Approval in reference to the property referred to as CATES RANCH INDUSTRIAL, located on Willow Drive, north of Highway 55, in the City of Medina, Hennepin County Minnesota (see Exhibit A – Location Map). Project Background Oppidan along with the Cates Family is proposing to develop a 30.19 acres parcel located in the Northeast corner of the intersection of Willow Drive and Chippewa Road (Parcel ID 0411823140004) into two industrial buildings. The buildings are intended to be used for warehouse or light manufacturing, compatible with a “Business (B))” Zoning. The Planning Commission and City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to guide this parcel to Industrial, in late 2022. During the comprehensive plan process the Planning Commission and City Council were shown three different conceptual layouts for the site. Our understanding is the consensus of the commission, and the council was to have a two-building layout with the buildings facing Willow Drive and have the easterly building back up to the west building to minimize the truck court area along Cates Ranch Road.. Zoning Change The current zoning of the proposed site plan is Rural Residential – Urban Reserve (RR-UR) We are requesting a zone change from Rural Residential-Urban Reserve (RR-UR) to Industrial. The site is currently bordered with the zones: Business (B), Commercial-Highway (CH), Rural Business Holding, and Residential with Business Park (BP), and Rural Commercial Holding (RCH) close nearby. We believe this zoning change would blend advantageously with nearby businesses while following our compliance plan amendment from 2022. Site and Landscape Plan The subject property is 30.19 acres and consists of farmland and a vacant farmstead, 7.08 acres of which are building areas. During the Comprehensive Plan process, the council and planning commission had the opportunity to review three different layouts for the property and provide their feedback. The design team incorporated the comments from the council and commission into the proposed layout and submitted said layout to the staff. Furthermore, we also incorporated additional staff, planning commission, council and public comments into the layout we are presenting. Therefore, we feel this is the most efficient layout for the site that will provide an additional area for employment within the city, while meeting the goals set by the planning commission and council to maintain the look and feel the City of Medina stands for. The proposed development will include two office/warehouse buildings equaling a total area of approximately 308,570 sq. ft. (see Exhibit B –Site Plan). The front side of the west buildingwill face Willow Drive and the east building will be facing the residential area to the east.. The truck courts and loading docks will be placed rear of the buildings and screened from public right-of-way view. Each building has full traffic circulation around all sides of the building for fire protection. Truck traffic will be limited to entering the stie from Chippewa Road and Cates Ranch Road and leaving the site from Cates Ranch Road. Dedicated car entrances will be connected to Willow Driveand Cates Ranch Road for the westerly building and to Chippewa Road and Cates Ranch Road from the easterly building. The building and parking setbacks for the Industrial Park zoning district are being with the proposed plan. A summary of the Proposed Setbacks required under the Insustrial Zoning Code and what is proposed for the developement are listed in the table below: Building Setbacks Required Provided For East Buildng Provided for West Building Front %0 Ft/100 From Res. 442 127.2 Side 50 Ft North 100 South 77.0 North 100 South 53.5 Rear 50 Ft 95 95 Residential 100 FT 100 North 442 East 100 Parking Setbacks Front 25 359.5 46.5 Side 25 100 100 Rear 25 NA NA Residential 50 328 100 Parking Landscaping on the site will have at least 8% of the interiors of all surface parking areas will be landscaped with breaks occurring approximately every 20 stalls. We are proposing three different parking areas. A West car parking area, a center truck loading and trailer parking area, and an East car parking area. Our West car park area measures at 19,541 sf. The West car park landscaping has a requiremetn of 1,563 sf (8%), but we are providing 1,843 sf (9.43%). The Center truck loading and parking area measures at 102,792 sf. The center truck loading and parking landscaping requires 8,223 sf (8%), but we are providing 10,250 sf (10.0%). Lastly, the East car parking area measures at 42,331 sf. The East car park landscaping requires 3,386 sf (8%), andt we are providing 3,473 sf (8.2%). Additionally, there are 210 spaces of parking required and we are proposing 216spaces. Required ADA parking falls at 7 spaces and we are proposing 8 spaces. Therefore, all areas of parking are above the code requirements. Landscaping on the site will consist of trees and shrubs along the buildings and throughout the development. Specific trees will be placed to screen the truck dock areas of the buildings along with a combination of beaming and opaque fencing. The trial connections along Chippewa Road will be set in a natural setting of trees, shrubs, and native plantings to complement the area. Previous Studies and Anticipated Traffic Improvements Before the Comprehensive Plan amendment, the developer conducted an Environmental Assessment Worksheet, (EAW) for the project to identify any environmental, traffic, infrastructure, or community issues with the project. Several agencies were given the opportunity to review this document and provide comments to the City and Developer. Thus, during the review process, there were very few comments regarding any issues, all very minor in nature, including comments from the adjoining community from the North that did not oppose the development. Through out the EAW process and initial discussions with City staff, traffic in the area has been a concern. Trunk Hwy 55 is a two-lane road as it intersects with Willow Drive, and even thought this intersection has a traffic signal it is known to not function very well for south bound traffic off Willow Drive. Several options were proposed to improve this intersection, but MNDOT will only allow a camera with some minor signal timing adjustments as they see fit. Therefore, in order to keep the intersection of Willow Drive and Hwy 55 functioning as it does today, the existing South bound left turn lane on Willow Drive will be extended to the intersection with Chippewa. Additionally, a South bound left turn lane will be constructed at the intersection of Willow Drive and Chippewa to accommodate traffic traveling East bound on Chippewa. Therefore, this will allow traffic to gain access to Hwy 55 at Arrowood Drive as well. Based on the traffic models the Arrowwood Drive and Hwy 55 intersection can accept the additional traffic along with the Willow Drive and Hwy 55 intersection. The improvements to Willow Drive will be installed with the proposed development at NO cost to the city. Thus, the improvements to Willow Drive will benefit not only the development, but the existing businesses and future developments to the West as well. The proposed site layout is consistent with the City’s desire for buildings in proximity with centralized activity. The proposed configuration does allow for significant open space preservation and continued functionality of natural wetland systems on- and off-site as well. Wetland Impacts The site has several wetlands on the property, of which four will be impacted in some way. Wetland 1 is a total area of 26,520 sf, and the impacted area equals 691 sf (1.89%) with a non-impacted area of 235,829 sf. Wetland 2 is total area of 11,570sf, and the impacted area equals 11,570 sf (100%) of with a non- impacted area of 0 sf. Wetland 3 is a total area of 21,635 sf with an impacted area of 2,147 sf (9.92%). This leaves the non-impacted area at 19,488 sf. Lastly, wetland 4 is a total area of 6,160ft with an impacted area of 1010 sf (16.6%). This leaves a non-impacted area of 5,140 sf. Thus, the entire wetland square footage equals 63,734 with an impacted 15,423 square feet. In regard to Wetland 2, through conversation with the city staff, the alignment of Cates Ranch Road needs to be moved south to align the entrance onto Willow Road to the access across the street. The realignment makes sense to do now, since Cates Ranch Road will become a city street at some point in the future. Additionally, it makes sense to have the intersections align because it makes Willow Drive safer from a traffic aspect. The realignment of Cates Ranch Road, and the access into the development will result in a wetland impact of approximately 11,570 sf from Wetland 2, or 100%. This is because the wetlands in this area lie within the ditches alongside the roadway, in order to realign the road and have the grades work of the development, the roadway needs to be widen and result is an impact to the wetlands in the ditch areas. The impact to Wetland 4 is a result of rotating the easterly building from an east to west configuration to a north and south configuration to minimize the amount of truck court fronting the Cates Ranch Road ROW. This was a direct result of the community input at the public hearing with planning commission for the concept plan review and was discussed at the concept plan review for the City Council. Utilities The City of Medina had WSB study the sanitary sewer in the area in November of 2019. The lift station feasibility study outlined the need for a lift station to serve properties to the north, west and east of this development with sanitary sewer. The WSB study indicates sanitary sewer services to the two buildings will be extended from easterly stub on the soth side of Chippeqa Road. . Both buildings will be served from an 8-inch stub on Chippewa Road located to the east of the property. As part of the project, a property for a new lift station will be assigned to the City as part of this development. Water service to the development will be provided from Willow Drive and extend to the north and east for future development. Internally, a fire loop will encompass the buildings with hydrants proposed throughout the development. Stormwater ponding will be provided for the development in accordance with the City and Elem Creek Watershed District Rules. The pond does meet the rate control requirements so the discharge from the proposed development does not exceed the existing condition in the 2-, 10-, and 100-year storm events. Stormwater reuse will be used to irrigate some of the landscape areas in the development, and to help meet the volume control requirement for the stormwater rules. The stormwater system is designed to maintain hydrology to the wetland areas being preserved, to maintain the viability of the animal and plant life in the wetlands there is today. Architecture Design Historically, the Medina’s industrial market has consisted of small to medium sized manufacturing and research facilities located in single use buildings. As the industrial/manufacturing market has matured, users are seeking more flexible leasable spaces as opposed to owner-occupied buildings. The proposed facilities are intended to target this type of user. The exterior elevations provide increased glass coverage and warm buff colors. The building is designed to provide a high level of flexibility for future tenants that require high level office environments adjacent to high-bay warehousing, manufacturing, and value-added production, which is in short supply in the west metro. This use will provide added economic and employment opportunities and will add overall value to the development. Parking is designed to accommodate 10-20 percent office use and can provide additional parking for manufacturing and value-added production in the rear loading/service area. The façade of the building is a composition of solid and voided space. The variation helps break apart the volume of the building. Window size and placement also play a large role in the overall perception of the building from a pedestrian’s point of view. The design team will utilize glass, and a variety of warm materials and colors to enhance each entry. Brick exposed aggregate and glass will balance the weight and scale of the building. This trio will provide adequate texture and depth to how the building is perceived. The windows and doors will be proportionate to human scale yet blend with the overall proportions of the building. Sustainable Initiatives The construction will incorporate waste diversion to reduce the amount that is disposed into landfills. This will include construction waste from both the site and building. Appropriate construction materials will be recycled as much as possible. The landscape design seeks to incorporate best management practices with regards to low impact design and vegetative buffering. The building shell is primarily composed of precast panels. The manufacturer of the precast panel is local to the area and the aggregate on the panels are from local quarries. The panels being investigated for use are the VersaCore+green sandwich type. These panels deliver R-values that are LEED friendly consisting of R=28.2 with 58% recycled content. The project will prepare the basic building for future EV charging stations for delivery trucks and vehicles if the tenants so desire. While the actual system for these energy saving ideas will be constructed by each tenant; the building will provide the basic infrastructure to accommodate them. The health and wellness of the end users are also important to this project. As many items will be finalized by the tenant’s design, the base building and site will contribute to the health of the end user in a positive manner. Below is a basic list of items that will be constructed and will contribute to a health and wellness of the occupants. o Outdoor trails that lead to natural environments o Possible bike racks. o Wall panels that have a high sound attenuation (STC), 52. o Clerestory windows and tall windows in the warehouse to provide access to daylight and offer outside views to warehouse employees o Use of sustainable products with low Volatile Organic Content (VOC). Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 3/14/2023 Minutes 1 2. Public Hearing – Cates Industrial Park – Oppidan Investments – Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review for Development of Approximately 310,000 S.F. Warehouse/Office on Two Lots (PID 0411823140004) Finke briefly reviewed the process that this application has undergone thus far, which brings them to consideration of the rezoning, preliminary plat, and site plan review tonight for the proposed development of approximately 310,000 square feet of warehouse/office use. He noted that a rezoning would be necessary to bring the zoning into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan amendment that was completed. He noted that both business and business park would be appropriate, reviewing the differences between the two and noting that staff would recommend that the property be rezoned to business. He reviewed the preliminary plat noting that the application exceeds the minimum lot requirements. He stated that there are a series of improvements proposed relating to transportation, providing a brief overview. He noted that the Park Commission will be reviewing this application at its next meeting and while park land dedication is not desired, there are trail easements proposed. He stated that staff recommends approval of the subdivision subject to the conditions noted in the staff report. He provided additional clarification on where staff would recommend right-of-way dedication. Jacob asked the width/dimension of the right-of-way. Finke stated that the outlot is 60 feet and additional right-of-way is proposed for the future roadway. He noted that 60 feet would be acceptable for roadway. Ahmed asked if the property to the north is under the same ownership. Finke replied that the current property owner owns the subject site, outlot, and property to the north. Ahmed asked if the City has a choice in accepting park land or trails. Finke confirmed that the City could accept ten percent of the buildable land of eight percent of the market value of the buildable land in lieu. Ahmed asked if the trail would be connected to something or stand alone. Finke provided details on the location of existing trails and the proposed trail alignment. He noted that this trail corridor does have high priority in the City plans, therefore staff believes it would be appropriate to construct this trail segment with the project. He moved to the site plan review reviewing details of building layout, architectural details, parking and proof of parking, and signage. He stated that staff recommends approval of the site plan review subject to the listed conditions. He suggested that the applicant be provided an opportunity to speak as well. Jacob recalled previous concern from adjacent neighbors related to noise mitigation. He asked if additional berming or other barriers would be added to the plan. Finke replied that there is a fair amount of topography change in that area. He stated that part of that discussion was also site orientation and noted that the development was shifted and the loading docks were moved internal as well. He noted that additional landscaping would be required to the east and north as specified in the staff report. He stated that berming may be difficult because of the topography, but additional grading and plantings could occur in what is now a wet area as that has been determined to be an incidental wetland. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 3/14/2023 Minutes 2 Popp referenced the zoning of business versus business park and asked if the examples provided are recently constructed. Finke replied that the businesses are not new but the rezoning to business is more recent. Popp noted the FDA zoning of some adjacent properties and asked if business park would be more appropriate in ensuring the FDA properties develop into residential in the future. He noted that perhaps adjacent zoning to business would tend to bring forward different land use proposals in the future, other than residential. Finke stated that when they look at the future use of adjacent property, they might consider the zoning of existing development in the area. He noted that the residential setback and other permitted uses are similar between business and business park and would not cause nonconformity. He stated that business would not prohibit the designation of residential property adjacent to the site. Popp referenced the windows, noting that it appears mostly the north and south sides were called out. He asked if the percentages mentioned are against a target. Finke replied that there is no explicit number within the Code and reviewed the language within the Code that provides a fair amount of flexibility that allows the City to determine what is appropriate. Ahmed asked the road improvements proposed. Finke reviewed the proposed road improvements. Jacob referenced the issue of signage and asked the criteria for a monument sign. Finke replied that City Code would allow for a dynamic display and reviewed the limitations of Code related to signage. He also provided details on coordinated signage. Rhem invited the applicant to speak. Peter Coyle, land use counsel for the applicant and landowner, stated that they have been before the Commission multiple times before tonight with different concepts and requests noting that the fundamental goal of the project has always been to bring forward a high quality industrial use that would be appropriate for this commercial/industrial corridor. He expressed appreciation for the patience and cooperation of staff throughout this lengthy process. He stated that all of the renderings have tried to depict what they saw coming with an industrial use, noting that the building has to fulfill the purpose of the tenant. He commented that they believe that they have presented an attractive project that would still meet the needs of a tenant. Jennifer Kaplan, project architect, commented on the experience that her firm has with industrial buildings and noted that Oppidan has been building quality buildings. She stated that in her opinion this is one of the best proposed. She provided more information comparing this architecture of the proposed project to recently completed projects in Ramsey and Chaska. Rhem opened the public hearing at 7:53 p.m. R.J. Berges, stated that he and his wife own approximately 20 acres to the east. He stated that because he does not entirely understand all the details, his lawyer has been in contact with Finke. He stated that their family support the Cates industrial park Oppidan project. He thanked Oppidan for Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 3/14/2023 Minutes 3 listening to their comments at previous meetings, noting that they notice the changes that have been made to the plans in response. He asked if the approval of the plat is conditioned upon the entire tax parcel that constitutes dedication of Cates Ranch Road as public right-of-way. He stated that it is his understanding that the improved portion from Willow to just past the entrance to the development will be public street maintained by the City, the cost for improvement of that roadway will be paid by the developer without assessment to the other landowners served by the roadway, and the remainder of the right-of-way will continue to be privately maintained until a future date but the dedication is still occurring at this time. Finke commented that it is not clear as to what is being proposed to the extent of right-of-way east in the outlot. Mike Brandt, project engineer, stated that the intent of the right-of-way is to dedicate but recognized the confusion where they are straightening out Cates Ranch Road. He noted that they are identifying that as outlot and would place right-of-way within that area. He stated that the intent is to dedicate the private road in a width of 60 feet east of the development at this time. Finke commented that it is the recommendation of staff that the first 560 feet be maintained by the owners of the industrial development rather than the City and would not be opened as a public street until some time in the future. He stated that the applicant agrees with that. Berges asked if the dedication of Cates Ranch Road would include a utility easement and whether the utilities would be stubbed along the road, with a future lift station that would allow his property to be served by sanitary sewer when that development occurs. He asked if water and other utilities would also be stubbed for future connection along Cates Ranch Road. Finke stated that utility rights would be included within the right-of-way for the future. He stated that water will be stubbed out at the end of Cates Ranch Drive, while sewer is not contemplated as the lift station would be off-site north on Willow Drive and is not constructed. He stated that the lift station would not serve this development. He stated that if the northern property were to be designated for development, staff would require that developer to extend utilities through the site. Berges referenced the single point of entrance onto Cates Ranch Drive while the plat shows two points of entry. He stated that he would prefer one entrance onto Cates Ranch Drive. He stated that drivers coming down Cates Ranch Drive for this development may overshoot the entrance and asked if there would be some type of cul-de-sac or turnaround at the end. Finke replied that nothing has been included but that is good input. He stated that perhaps they can use design and signage to minimize that occurrence. Berges commented that many of the drawings and renderings reference Cates Ranch Road, while currently it is called Cates Ranch Drive and asked if there are plans to change the name. Finke replied that there are no plans to change the name of the roadway. Rhem closed the public hearing at 8:04 p.m. Ahmed referenced an egress and asked if that is required noting that seems an odd place for a driveway. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 3/14/2023 Minutes 4 Finke replied that the alternative would be to share the truck court, which could be problematic. He stated that the intent is to have a main entrance for employee vehicles and another for the truck court users. Brandt confirmed that they would like to keep truck and regular vehicle traffic separate. He stated that this concept also provides multiple access points for fire and public safety. Nielsen stated that there are a lot of conditions proposed by staff and asked if the applicant agrees. Coyle replied that they accept the conditions as proposed. Nielsen stated that she has been present throughout this process and is pleased with the project proposed today. She thanked the applicant for the changes that have been made and is also pleased with the architectural detail as presented tonight. Plec stated that while he is new to the Commission, he did read through the information from the last meetings, and it seems that this project has come a long way. He stated that this looks like a high finish industrial park and does not look like a typical distribution dock where there would be a ton of traffic coming and going. He stated that he has reviewed recently constructed projects in other communities and this appears to be top notch. Popp echoed the comments of the previous members. He commented that the presentation tonight related to architecture was helpful and eased many of his concerns. He stated that he is much more comfortable now and this will establish the standard going forward. He stated that he supports the design and is also supportive of the business zoning. Finke commented that most of the standards between business and business park are the same. He noted that while business would allow an additional story for the building, that is not proposed in this case. He noted that the setbacks proposed would also meet the standards of both districts. Jacob appreciated the Cates family and its team for incorporating all the feedback to present a great project. He asked if an additional condition would be needed related to the maintenance of the first 560 feet of the roadway. He also believed that signage requirements should be incorporated into the conditions as well. Finke stated that those items can be included in the motion tonight and staff could draft language for the conditions. Rhem appreciated the developer and project owner for incorporating the feedback received throughout the project to produce a project that will set a good standard. Motion by Nielsen, seconded by Jacob, to recommend approval with the conditions noted in the staff report and the additional condition that signage meets relevant Code requirements, and additional detail related to maintenance of Cates Ranch Drive prior to dedication to the City. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Piper) Medina City Council Excerpt from 5/17/2022 Minutes 1 Cates Industrial Park – Concept Plan Review (7:19 p.m.) Johnson stated that the applicant has withdrawn their original request and has submitted a request for approximately 300,000 square feet of warehouse, light industrial, office use on the southern portion of the property. He stated that three concepts were provided to determine if the Council would support a scaled down use of this nature. Finke stated that a Comprehensive Plan amendment would still be needed to support this use. He stated that the subject site is south of Cates Ranch Drive. He stated that there is discussion within the report about the impression of staff highlighting positives and negatives of each concept, if the broader land use change is supported. He displayed the elevations that were provided along with the three concepts. He noted that staff believes that trunk access to Willow is important regardless of the concept. He stated that a PUD may make sense in order to maximize the setback and greenspace on the exterior of the site and support truck circulation on the interior. He stated that the staff report does identify changes in property use compared to the acreage previously projected for business. He noted that transportation was thoroughly discussed with the larger project. He stated that even though the impact would be reduced with a smaller scale project, there would be anticipated improvements related to the project. He stated that the applicant has stated that they would be willing to provide the land for a sanitary sewer lift station and noted that staff would look for a lower elevation location to make installation of the lift station earlier. He noted that the Planning Commission discussed modulation of the building and the importance of that, should this move forward. He welcomed input from the Council on the broader land use question as well as on the concepts. DesLauriers asked if the lift station was included in the City’s CIP for 2023. He also asked if the CIP only included the cost for the lift station and not the acquisition of land. Albers stated that he would like to discuss what has changed from the last review other than this being smaller. He believed the direction was very specific related to a change in zoning. DesLauriers stated that they asked the applicant to come back with a version on the southern half, which is what has been done. Martin agreed that the Council invited the applicant to come back and present a request for the southern portion. Anderson agreed that four members of the Council supported the applicant coming back with a reduced scale plan while Albers was opposed. Albers asked what has changed that would change the perspective of the Council. Finke stated that one of the Comprehensive Plan objectives is to provide opportunities for the desired amount of business development. He stated that it could be argued that the smaller scale would better meet the desire of the Council for that type of development. Albers commented that there are certain things the Council is supposed to review when considering a Comprehensive Plan amendment and he did not think the criteria were met. DesLauriers stated that a vote was not taken last time as it was a concept. He read some of the comments and consensus of the Council from the previous minutes which invited the applicant to come back with revised plans. Medina City Council Excerpt from 5/17/2022 Minutes 2 Albers asked if the answers of the Council on the broader land use question have changed. Finke replied that the decision would provide the Council with the highest level of discretion. He stated that the mission, vision, principles, and goals would provide guidance when considering an amendment to the plan. Martin stated that in looking at the vision and goals within the report, she recalled the previous discussion of the Council related to the use. She stated that it is a bit of a stretch. She asked how the Comprehensive Plan goals would be achieved moving forward. She stated that conceptually the Council seemed to buy off on a commercial use but perhaps the size of the project was too severe. She stated that she did recall some support for the use and invitation for the applicant to come back with a reduced scale project. DesLauriers commented that this request meets three of the five requirements for the business district. He stated that when looking at FDA, the key component is that any future development would rely on infrastructure. He noted that the infrastructure is in place to support the development. He stated that Graphic Packaging is located across the street and another business down the road, therefore this property is in a business district and this project would create jobs. Albers stated that the Council was going down the path towards denial and therefore was confused as to what has changed. DesLauriers stated that the size was an important factor as he believes 30 acres fits much better than 70 acres. He stated that this sized development makes sense in this area. He confirmed that his decision is also supported by the fact that the necessary infrastructure is in place or would be added by the developer. Martin recognized that two members of the Council are not present to provide input tonight. She invited the developer to speak. Peter Coyle, spoke representing the applicant, noting that they did attempt to make changes to address the feedback of the Council. He stated that the broad goals they believe their concept would address including job creation opportunity, business creation, quality of life, and protection of natural resources. He commented that infrastructure is important and if there are transportation impacts caused by the project, they would fund those improvements. He noted that the northern parcel would also remain rural, more at the direction of the Council than the applicant. He stated that the designation of FDA is a non-designation and believes that the City should be able to designate actual land uses for properties. He stated that they would like to proceed with a version of this plan. He stated that they have been working with staff for eight to nine months, including completion of the required EAW. He stated that the primary objective of the meeting tonight was to determine whether this reduced scale project would be supported before moving for formal submissions. Martin asked for input on the three concepts. Albers stated that he prefers option three. Martin stated that she also preferred that concept but could also support option two if there was more modulation. Medina City Council Excerpt from 5/17/2022 Minutes 3 DesLauriers stated that he did not have a strong feeling either way but would lean towards concept two. He stated that he would square up the layout of the building and would have two access drives to Willow, one for vehicles and one for trucks. Martin commented that it would go without saying that a submittal would also need to meet City Code in terms of landscaping and architecture. Coyle commented that these are just concepts as they would still need to get a tenant and would not be building something without the input of the ultimate user. Martin recognized that if there were two users, perhaps the two-building concept would be the better fit in that scenario. She stated that she would be flexible between options two and three, depending on what was most beneficial to the user. DesLauriers asked staff if there was a preference for one of these plans in terms of the lift station. Finke stated that the discussion has not yet been had with the applicant. He noted that the projected location was actually on the northern parcel but recognized that may no longer be on the table. He noted that the concepts show the lift station on the corner of the site, which is high in elevation, but believed there were opportunities in lower elevations for that lift station. DesLauriers asked if there is any concern with the future DLRT through this area. Finke noted that layout is more to the west. He stated that there were comments related to pedestrian connectivity included in the review. Martin noted that she agrees with much of the analysis within the staff report. She confirmed the consensus of the Council that any future plans would need to address the analysis and comments within the staff report. K:\019596-000\Admin\Docs\2023-02-06 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2023-02-23 Cates Ranch Ind Dev Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx 70 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | SU I T E 3 0 0 | M I N N E A P O L I S , M N | 55 4 1 6 | 76 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | W S B E N G . C O M February 23, 2023 Mr. Dusty Finke City Planning Director City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: Cates Industrial Park Development – Preliminary Plat & Plan Review City Project No. LR-23-339 WSB Project No. 019596-000 Dear Mr. Finke: WSB staff have reviewed the Cates Medina Industrial Site Development Preliminary Plat and Plans dated January 31, 2023. The applicant proposes to construct two industrial buildings totaling approximately 308,000 square feet on roughly 30 acres. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina’s general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. General & Preliminary Plat (Sheet V103) 1. The City Planner will provide comments pertaining to the proposed landscaping, overall trail/pedestrian access, and tree preservation plan under separate cover. 2. The City Fire Marshall will provide pertinent comments under separate cover. 3. With future submittals, show the existing and proposed street right-of-way widths clearly on the preliminary plat and site plan. 4. The plan includes pedestrian facilities. See the City Planners comments on pedestrian access and mobility requirements. 5. Any work within MnDOT right of way will require a permit and may require a detailed design review by MnDOT staff. 6. Provide additional ROW on Chippewa at Willow to accommodate future widening/turn lanes (more than what was added with this revision). For all other RTL locations provide a minimum 10’ boulevard from edge of pavement/curb to ROW. 7. A future trail corridor was shown on the plans. Proposed grading will need to accommodate future construction of a trail within this corridor; the 4:1 pond slopes crossing the corridor will not be acceptable. 8. At the final plat stage, in order to calculate a letter of credit and construction engineering escrow amounts for the final development agreement, an engineer’s estimate (in Excel format) of the proposed utility improvements (watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, permanent stormwater management, etc.) and a schedule for completion of construction will be required. The estimate should also include the cost of landscaping items (significant trees). Cates Industrial Park Development Preliminary Plat & Plans – Engineering Review February 23, 2023 Page 2 K:\019596-000\Admin\Docs\2023-02-06 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2023-02-23 Cates Ranch Ind Dev Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx 9. Additional comments have been provided directly on the plan sheets. Not all comments on the plans have been summarized in this review letter. Site Plan & Streets (C400 – C421) 10. Provide a turning movement exhibit to show that a fire truck can access all building structures and required turn around space as required by the Fire Marshall. Show turning movements for pumper truck accessing all proposed hydrant locations. 11. City design standards require horizontal and vertical curve lengths for public roadways to meet a 30 MPH design speed, at minimum (Cates Ranch Drive). Willow Drive and Chippewa Road are posted at 40 MPH and any roadway modifications or proposed improvements will need to meet that minimum speed criteria. Confirm thru-lane tapers are designed to prevailing MnDOT design standards. 12. With future submittals provide a grading plan, utility plan, erosion/sediment control plans, signing/striping plan, and construction details plans. The signing/striping plan should include truck entrance/do not enter signs to clearly delineate truck access/restrictions. A SWPPP narrative is not needed until the final plat/construction plan submittal. Complete, a full plan set was provided with the latest submittal. Add typical street section(s) details to the plans meeting the City’s standard, at minimum. The final pavement section shall be designed by a registered geotechnical engineer for the specific soil conditions found on the site. The pavement section for the primary fire truck access route shall meet a 9-ton design. 13. The design/construction of the proposed Cates Ranch Drive will need to meet prevailing City Standards. a. Provide road profiles for the Cates Ranch Road extension. b. The existing Cates Ranch Road will need to transition smoothly into the proposed roadway improvements; the transition is currently shown as a 33.50% grade. c. The approach grade to Willow Drive should be flattened so that there is not such a steep slope immediately east of the intersection. 14. The revised plan shows a second access to Cates Ranch Road. Connect the front parking lot access to the easterly access point so as there is only one access point. Utility Plans (C600 – C611) General: 15. Any public sanitary sewer and watermain shall be encompassed by drainage and utility easements where located outside of public road right of way. Drainage and utility easements will need to allow for a 1:1 trench from the invert of the utility with a minimum of 20’ centered on the utility. Clarify limits of public and private utilities. 16. With future submittals show the existing/proposed watermain and sanitary sewer systems, structure locations, hydrants, and valve locations. Label the pipe size, pipe material, connection points to existing, and proposed percent grade for gravity mains. Label more clearly the size and material types for the existing utility infrastructure. 17. Turn off contouring on the utility plans. 18. Add general notes to the utility plans to the effect of: Cates Industrial Park Development Preliminary Plat & Plans – Engineering Review February 23, 2023 Page 3 K:\019596-000\Admin\Docs\2023-02-06 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2023-02-23 Cates Ranch Ind Dev Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx a. The City shall not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that are associated with variations in the utility as-built elevations. All utility connections shall be verified in the field. b. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The Owner and Engineer of Record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards. c. All watermain and sanitary sewer testing shall be conducted in accordance with the City standards and specifications. Copies of all test results shall be submitted to the City (Public Works Director, City Engineer), the Owner, and the Engineer of Record. d. Watermain shall have a minimum cover of 7.5’. e. Tracer wire installation shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the MN Rural Water Association Standards. See these standards for further details. f. The City will require televising for sanitary sewer pipe installations prior to accepting a warranty for the utility system; provide report and video files to the City for review. 19. Any public sanitary sewer and watermain shall be encompassed by drainage and utility easements where located outside of public road right of way. Drainage and utility easements will need to allow for a 1:1 trench from the invert of the utility with a minimum of 20’ centered on the utility. 20. Provide dimension notes from watermain to parallel sewer mains (storm and sanitary sewer); the minimum horizontal separation between mains is 10 feet. Where watermain crosses any storm sewer or sanitary sewer, add a note at each location to the effect of “Maintain 18-inch Separation, 4” Rigid Insulation”. If offsets are required where conflicts with normal watermain pipe placement occur, add appropriate details to the plans. 21. Label the pipe material/strength designation for sewer mains (i.e. SDR 35, SDR 26, etc.) and class of RCP for storm sewer. Watermain: 22. Watermain looping connections will be needed to minimize long dead-end watermain sections. Consideration of further watermain looping needs and stubs for future phases or other adjacent developments will be required and reviewed with future submittals. In- progress with plan updates. With this in mind, the City will require that a 12-inch watermain be extended along Chippewa Road from the existing 12-inch watermain at the intersection of Chippewa Road and Willow Drive east to the existing watermain location at Chippewa Court/Okalee Senior Living Site. In addition, a 12-inch watermain loop is required within the site up to and including Cates Ranch Drive. Clarify how far east the existing connection along Chippewa Road will need to be. Based on as-builts the 12” was only extended to 1,000’ east of Chippewa Ct or 1,350’ east of the eastern development line. 23. Hydrant locations shall be approved of by the Fire Marshal; typically, a maximum of 250’ influence radius (approximately 400’ spacing) is required to serve the immediate residential areas. Provide an exhibit showing hydrant influence spacing. 24. The watermain connections to the building(s) shall be reviewed and approved by the City Fire Marshall. Show the location of the PIV and curb stop location on the plan(s). The Cates Industrial Park Development Preliminary Plat & Plans – Engineering Review February 23, 2023 Page 4 K:\019596-000\Admin\Docs\2023-02-06 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2023-02-23 Cates Ranch Ind Dev Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx City requires that domestic and fire services are separate taps from the main. A separate curb stop is required for the domestic service and gate valve (PIV) for the fire line. Only common services provided. Sanitary Sewer: 25. With future submittals show proposed sanitary sewer service lines and invert elevations on plans; the City requires a minimum depth of 4’ from low floor elevations. A separate water/sewer service will be required for each building. 26. The City’s typical standard is to place sewer main a minimum of 10’ below the surface (18” vertical separation below the watermain). Where this depth is not feasible, the City will allow an 8’ depth; depths less than 8’ will require review on a case-by-case basis. With future submittals, indicate building low floor elevations and confirm gravity serviceability based on the existing sanitary sewer invert elevations. Service areas shown as low as 5’ depth. 5’-7’ depth shown as insulated 27. The City prepared an engineering feasibility analyzing the existing sewer system and future improvements to the system required to serve the Cates site. For more detailed information reference the feasibility document dated November 19, 2019. Complete, the applicant is proposing gravity sewer to serve the proposed buildings. a. Gravity sewer is anticipated to serve the southern proposed building within the development from the existing system along Chippewa Road. With future submittals, show how this connection will be made. b. The proposed Willow Drive/TH 55 Regional Lift Station is anticipated to serve future development north of Cates Ranch Drive. northern two proposed buildings. Although it is anticipated the current building/concept plan will utilize gravity sewer, the City will require that easements over the land needed to construction the proposed lift station (further north) are provided by the applicant. 28. The proposed sanitary sewer connection to the east on Chippewa passes too close to the adjacent property at SS-39. More separation will be needed to accommodate installation and future access without disturbance to this property. Grading and Erosion Control Plans (Sheets C300 – C320, C500 – C510) Grading 29. There appears to be curb proposed for the easterly access on Chippewa Road, but no way to drain the grade as shown. 30. Provide EOF locations for all low points inside and outside the roadway. Some EOF locations require updating and all EOF routes should be provided on the overall grading plan. 31. The cross slope for any of the pedestrian facilities cannot exceed 2.0%. In some locations of the proposed trail, it appears this grade may be exceeded. 32. With final plat submittal provide the following: a. In general maintain all surface grades within the minimum of 2.0% and maximum 33% slopes. Vegetated swale grades shall also be a minimum of 2.0%. b. Drainage arrows on plans showing direction of runoff. Note specifically high points between each side-yard swale. Cates Industrial Park Development Preliminary Plat & Plans – Engineering Review February 23, 2023 Page 5 K:\019596-000\Admin\Docs\2023-02-06 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2023-02-23 Cates Ranch Ind Dev Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx c. Include percent slope In all other swale locations and verify that it meets the City requirement of 2%. See western swales along Arrowhead Drive. d. Add rip-rap quantities and class notes at each flared end section and pond overflows (if applicable). e. Note the size of proposed storm sewer structures. 33. A more detailed review of the grading plan will be made with future submittals. Erosion Control 34. The proposed project will disturb more than one acre. Develop and include a SWPPP consistent with the MPCA CSWGP with future plan submittals. 35. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. 36. A full review of the erosion/sediment control plan and SWPPP sheets will be completed with future submittals. Redundant perimeter control is required around all wetlands and lakes. An additional row of erosion control will be required 5’ from the original silt fence in these locations. Traffic & Access 37. A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) was completed with the EAW dated December 22, 2021. The recommended improvements from the TIS included: o TH 55 at Willow Drive: Traffic signal timing modifications with approval by MnDOT. – This has not yet been confirmed or verified o TH 55 at Willow Drive: If traffic signal timing modifications are not approved, addition of a 300ft southbound Willow Drive dual left turn lanes with an eastbound TH 55 acceleration lane.- This has not yet been determined. o TH 55 at Willow Drive: Lengthen the westbound TH 55 acceleration lane to accommodate trucks. – This has not been included o Willow Drive at Chippewa Drive: Northbound Willow Drive right turn lane and westbound Chippewa Drive left turn lane.- The northbound right is included but the westbound left has not been included. o Willow Drive: Pave north to site boundary to city standards.- Completed. o Cates Ranch Drive: Pave east to site boundary to city standards.- Completed. o Willow Drive Site Access: Northbound Willow Drive right turn lane. – Completed. o Chippewa Drive Site Access: Westbound Chippewa Drive right turn lane. – Completed. To improve safety and operations of the area roadways these improvements shall be included with the development construction plans. 38. The project site does not include any existing parking spaces. The proposed project includes 585 vehicle parking and 219 truck parking stalls. The proposed industrial parking Cates Industrial Park Development Preliminary Plat & Plans – Engineering Review February 23, 2023 Page 6 K:\019596-000\Admin\Docs\2023-02-06 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2023-02-23 Cates Ranch Ind Dev Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx is consistent with city ordinances, which requires one space per 2,000 square feet gross floor area. - Completed 39. A sight line analysis (vertical and horizontal) should be provided to ensure that vehicles and trucks can make safe turning movements into and out of each proposed site driveway location. – This has not been included. 40. Include a signing and pavement marking plan. 41. Additional notes on traffic elements: Stormwater Management 42. The applicant will need to submit a Stormwater Management Plan and modeling consistent with Medina’s Stormwater Design Manual. 43. The development will need to meet the City’s volume control requirement to capture and retain onsite 1.1” of runoff from the net new impervious surface Infiltration is required onsite to meet the volume control requirement, but if infiltration is prohibited or not advisable due to prevailing soil conditions, follow the City’s Stormwater Design Manual for alternative credits towards the volume requirements. 44. Pretreatment in the form of ponds, forebays, filter strips, or other approved methods shall be provided for all infiltration areas. The last structure in the street prior to discharging into a pond is to be a minimum of five feet deep with a four-foot deep sump. a. CBMH should be sump manholes with a minimum 4’ sump per city design guidelines. Change CBMH 12, 22, 24, and 26 to sump manholes Cates Industrial Park Development Preliminary Plat & Plans – Engineering Review February 23, 2023 Page 7 K:\019596-000\Admin\Docs\2023-02-06 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2023-02-23 Cates Ranch Ind Dev Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx 45. TP for the proposed conditions must be the same or less than existing. Currently TP is being shown as increased with the project. Additional information on the water reuse system should help resolve this problem 46. The applicant may want to consider using the stormwater ponds for irrigation. Credits for volume control can be given for stormwater reuse. City ordinance does not allow for municipal water system to be used for irrigation. a. Required design submittal packages for water reuse BMPs must include: a. An analysis using Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District Stormwater Reuse Calculator. An example of the Calculator can be found in Appendix E. The full spreadsheet can be requested from the City. b. Documentation demonstrating adequacy of soils, storage system, and delivery system; and c. Operations and maintenance plan. The O& M plan should follow the guidelines listed in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. b. Approved capacity of an irrigation practice will be based on: a. An irrigation rate of 1.0 inches per week over the irrigated pervious area(s) or the rate identified through the Stormwater Reuse Calculator (whichever is less); or as approved by the City; and b. No greater than a 26 week (April 15th to October 15th) growing season. c. Design of the irrigation system must include, but is not limited to, the following items. Each system will be reviewed and approved by the City on a site-by-site basis. a. Plumbing code review, adherence, and permitting, if applicable. b. Water reuse pump system design including supply line, intake, meter, and pump c. Electrical and controls design d. Construction drawings, specifications, and system integration. d. Two (2) feet of permanent pool from the bottom of the pond must be maintained following drawdown for irrigation. Stormwater Design Manual City of Medina, MN WSB Project No. 011705-000 Page 20 e. Use rates should be monitored at least monthly for at least three years. This should be compared to the water budget analysis of the design to determine whether the modeled level of performance is being achieved. 47. The development will need to meet the City’s rate control requirement, which states that post development discharge rates must be less than or equal to existing conditions discharge rates. 48. The City requires two feet of freeboard from structure low openings to 100-year high water levels and EOF’s. Provide maintenance access to all ponding facilities. a. FFE of the proposed buildings is 997, verify that the EOF of the parking lot and curb to the adjacent berm includes the required 2’ separation. 49. Include a stabilized EOF on the stormwater pond and show the proposed EOF route through the berm. a. EOFs shall be sized with a minimum bottom width of five feet and 4:1 side slopes. b. The maximum flow depth in EOFs shall be less than or equal to one foot as calculated for 100-year back-to-back storm event. 50. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards for Elm Creek Water Management Commission and the applicant shall submit for the required permits. 51. Add rip rap at all outlet locations for stabilization and to prevent erosion. Cates Industrial Park Development Preliminary Plat & Plans – Engineering Review February 23, 2023 Page 8 K:\019596-000\Admin\Docs\2023-02-06 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2023-02-23 Cates Ranch Ind Dev Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx 52. All constructed ponds shall be provided a maintenance access from an adjacent roadway. The maintenance access shall be provided in the form of an easement no narrower than 20 feet. The maintenance access shall have a longitudinal slope no steeper than 6:1 and minimal cross slope. a. Show access to the maintenance bench from the road that meets the 6:1 slope 53. Discharge velocity into a pond at the outlet elevation shall be 6 fps or less. a. Where outlet velocities to ponds exceed 6 fps, the design should be based on the unique site conditions present. Submergence of the outlet or installation of a stilling basin approved by the City is required when excessive outlet velocities are experienced. 54. Riprap protection is required at all inlet pipes into ponds from the NWL to the pond bottom. 55. Include an operation and maintenance agreement for all proposed stormwater bmp’s. Wetlands & Environmental 56. The concept plan shows several wetlands located on the site. Aquatic resources were delineated using a routine Level 2 delineation method and have been approved (Notice of Decision 12/10/2021). 57. Confirm the wetland boundaries on the site plan are those approved as part of the 12/10/21 Notice of Decision for wetland boundary and type. “Impacted Wetland 2” boundaries do not match the approved boundary shape. 58. Approximately 15,423 square feet of wetland impact is anticipated. Any permanent or temporary impacts proposed must be permitted via the Wetland Conservation Act as well as US Army Corps of Engineers. 59. Upland buffers and buffer setbacks will be required for the project. The table below outlines the management classification as determined by the City’s Functional Classification of Wetlands map and the wetland buffers proposed for the project. Wetlands without a management classification will require a MnRAM to determine appropriate buffer widths. Text in red denotes buffers that do not meet the requirement. Wetland ID Functional Classification Required Buffer Average (ft)/Minimum (ft) Proposed Buffer Average (ft)/Minimum (ft) Wetland 1 Manage 3 20/15 N/A – outside project Wetland 2 TBD TBD N/A – outside project Wetland 3 Manage 3 20/15 25 Wetland 4 Manage 2 25/20 N/A – outside project Wetland 5 TBD TBD N/A – fully impacted Wetland 6 TBD TBD 25/25 Cates Industrial Park Development Preliminary Plat & Plans – Engineering Review February 23, 2023 Page 9 K:\019596-000\Admin\Docs\2023-02-06 Submittal (Preliminary Plat)\_2023-02-23 Cates Ranch Ind Dev Prelim Plat - WSB Engineering Comments.docx Wetland 7 TBD TBD 25/25 Wetland 8 TBD TBD 25/25 Wetland 9 Manage 1 30/20 25/25 Wetland 10 Preserve 35/25 25/25 Wetland 11 Manage 3 20/15 25/25 Wetland 12 TBD TBD 25/25 60. Remove the wetland setback (aka upland buffer) shown around “Impacted Wetland 2”. 61. Remove wetland setbacks (aka upland buffer) that extend into public right-of-way. 62. Upland buffers should be seeded with a native seed mix (e.g., 35-221, 35-241). 63. Show location of upland buffer monuments on site plans. At a minimum, one marker shall be placed per lot at the upslope edge of the Upland Buffer Zone and then placed every 250 feet thereafter and on all common lot lines. 64. Any necessary tree clearing must be reviewed for compliance with the US Fish and Wildlife Services Northern Long-Eared Bat guidance, when it becomes available in March 2023. 65. Fugitive dust generated during construction must be controlled by sweeping, watering, or sprinkling, as appropriate or as prevailing weather and soil conditions dictate. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The owner, developer, and engineer of record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards. With future submittals, include a response to the comments in this letter. We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 612-419-1549 if you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet. Sincerely, WSB Jim Stremel, P.E. City Engineer SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 0 - C O V E R S H E E T . d w g F e b r u a r y 0 1 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 1 : 4 3 a m PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y NORTH VICINITY N.T.S. SITE MEDINA, COUNTY, MN 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2.IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A 30x42 SHEET. 3.ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. 4.ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. NOTES: PROJECT TEAM: ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED BY: MICHAEL C. BRANDT, P.E. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 CATES MEDINA INDUSTRIAL SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 118N, RANGE 23W FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call ARCHITECT MOHAGEN HANSEN 1000 TWELVE OAKS CENTER DR. STE 200, WAYZATA, MN 55391 TELEPHONE: (952) 426 - 7400 SITE BENCHMARKS: TOP OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GEODETIC MONUMENT "2722 Q" ELEVATION: 973.23 FEET (NAVD88) BENCHMARKS HWY 5 5 W I L L O W D R . PI O N E E R T R A I L LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST.PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE: (651) 645 - 4197 CONTACT: MICHAEL C. BRANDT SURVEYOR EGAN, FIELD, & NOWAK 1229 TYLER ST NE, STE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 TELEPHONE: (612) 466 - 3300 FAX: (612) 466 - 3383 OWNER / DEVELOPER OPPIDAN 400 WATER ST #200 TELEPHONE: (952) 294 - 1246 CONTACT: JAY MOORE PR E P A R E D F O R CO V E R S H E E T C000 CA T E S M E D I N A I N D U S T R I A L O P P I D A N M E D I N A M N DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . M I C H A E L C . B R A N D T , P . E . 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 42 6 6 1 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 7 7 4 0 5 4 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 AS S H O W N ZT R M L S M C B Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title C000 COVER SHEET C100 GENERAL NOTES V100 ALTA LAND TITLE SURVEY V101 ALTA LAND TITLE SURVEY V102 ALTA LAND TITLE SURVEY V103 PRELIMINARY PLAT C200 OVERALL DEMO PLAN C300 OVERALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PH1 C301 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ENLARGEMENTS - PH1 C302 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ENLARGEMENTS - PH1 C303 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ENLARGEMENTS - PH1 C304 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ENLARGEMENTS - PH1 C305 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ENLARGEMENTS - PH1 C306 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ENLARGEMENTS - PH1 C307 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ENLARGEMENTS - PH1 C310 OVERALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PH2 C311 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ENLARGEMENTS - PH2 C312 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ENLARGEMENTS - PH2 C313 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ENLARGEMENTS - PH2 C314 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ENLARGEMENTS - PH2 C315 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ENLARGEMENTS - PH2 C316 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ENLARGEMENTS - PH2 C317 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ENLARGEMENTS - PH2 C320 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS C400 OVERALL SITE PLAN C401 SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C402 SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C403 SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C404 SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C405 SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C406 SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C407 SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C420 SITE DETAILS C421 SITE DETAILS C490 SITE PLAN VEHICLE MOVEMENT - FIRE TRUCK C491 SITE PLAN VEHICLE MOVEMENT C492 SITE PLAN VEHICLE MOVEMENT C500 OVERALL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C501 GRADING PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C502 GRADING PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C503 GRADING PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C504 GRADING PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C505 GRADING PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C506 GRADING PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C507 GRADING PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C510 GRADING DETAILS C600 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C601 UTILITY PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C602 UTILITY PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C603 UTILITY PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C604 UTILITY PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C605 UTILITY PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C606 UTILITY PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C607 UTILITY PLAN ENLARGEMENTS C610 UTILITY DETAILS C611 UTILITY DETAILS L100 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L101 LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENTS L102 LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENTS L104 LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENTS L103 LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENTS L105 LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENTS L106 LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENTS L107 LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENTS L108 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L200 IRRIGATION PLAN SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ V 1 - A L T A . d w g F e b r u a r y 0 1 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 : 2 0 p m PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E P A R E D F O R AL T A L A N D T I T L E S U R V E Y V100 CA T E S M E D I N A I N D U S T R I A L O P P I D A N M E D I N A M N W I L L O W D R I V E C H I P P E W A R O A D S T A T E H I G H W A Y N O . 5 5 C H I P P E W A R O A D P A R C E L 2 W I L L O W D R I V E CATES RANCH ROAD CAT E S R A N C H R O A D C H I P P E W A R O A D C H I P P E W A R O A D L O T 1 B L O C K 1 C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K L O T 2 B L O C K 1 C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K O U T L O T B C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K T T O U T L O T A C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K PROPOSED ±131,746 SF BUILDING W/ 8 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED ±176,824 SF BUILDING W/ 15 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 98 . 0 ' 439.8' 441.0' 291 . 8 ' 81 . 8 ' 11 5 . 5 ' 53 . 5 ' 142.1' 142.1' 99 . 4 ' 99 . 2 ' 99 . 6 ' 12.0' PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE S3 6 ° 2 6 ' 5 4 " W 17 . 9 2 ' S3 3 ° 4 7 ' 4 7 " W 40 . 2 9 ' S2 ° 4 3 ' 2 7 " W 10 . 0 0 ' S1 ° 1 4 ' 3 3 " E 34 3 . 4 8 ' S88°45'25"W 501.80' PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT CATES INDUSTRIAL PARK PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASMENT SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ V 1 - P R E L I M I N A R Y P L A T . d w g F e b r u a r y 0 1 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 1 : 4 5 a m PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE LEGEND DELINEATED WETLAND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED LANDSCAPE BERM DELINEATED WETLAND SETBACK PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R NORTH PR E P A R E D F O R PR E L I M I N A R Y P L A T V103 CA T E S M E D I N A I N D U S T R I A L O P P I D A N M E D I N A M N PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 30.19 AC PROPOSED LOT 1 TOTAL AREA 7.68 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (LOT1)5.41 AC (70.44% OF PROPERTY AREA) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (LOT1)2.27 AC (29.56% OF PROPERTY AREA) WILLOW DRIVE DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY 0.22 AC PROPOSED LOT 2 TOTAL AREA 11.71 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (LOT 2)7.75 AC (66.18% OF PROPERTY AREA) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (LOT 2)3.96 AC (33.82% OF PROPERTY AREA) PROPOSED OUTLOT A TOTAL AREA 9.76 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (OUTLOT A) 2.40 AC (24.59% OF PROPERTY AREA) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (OUTLOT A) 7.36 AC (75.41% OF PROPERTY AREA PROPOSED OUTLOT B TOTAL AREA 0.82 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (OUTLOT B) 0.33 AC (40.24% OF PROPERTY AREA) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (OUTLOT B) 0.49 AC (59.76% OF PROPERTY AREA) BUILDING AREAS 7.08 AC (23.45% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) PARKING TRAILER DOCK DOORS (LOT 1)9 SPACES TRAILER DOCK DOORS (LOT 2)15 SPACES ASSOCIATE PARKING (LOT 1)92 SPACES ASSOCIATE PARKING (LOT 2)138 SPACES TRAILER PARKING (LOT1)16 SPACES TRAILER PARKING (LOT 2)18 SPACES REQUIRED PARKING (LOT 1)66 SPACES @ 1 SPACE / 2000 SF REQUIRED PARKING (LOT 2)89 SPACES @ 1 SPACE / 2000 SF REQUIRED/PROPOSED ADA PARKING (LOT 1)3 SPACES / 4 SPACES REQUIRED/PROPOSED ADA PARKING (LOT2)4 SPACES / 4 SPACES DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 7 7 4 0 5 4 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 AS S H O W N ZT R M L S M C B 99 5 99 5 99 3 99 3 99 4 99 4 99 6 996 997 W I L L O W D R I V E C H I P P E W A R O A D S T A T E H I G H W A Y N O . 5 5 C H I P P E W A R O A D P A R C E L 2 W I L L O W D R I V E CATES RANCH ROAD CAT E S R A N C H R O A D C H I P P E W A R O A D C H I P P E W A R O A D 99 0 99 1 99 2 99 3 99 4 98 0 985 99 0 99 5 976 977 97 8 978 978 97 9 98 1 98 2 983 984 986 987 988 98 9 98 9 99 1 992 993 994 99 6 99 7 99 8 980 985 990 995 10 0 0 977 977 978 979 981 982 983 984 986 987 988 989 991 992 993 994 996 996 997 997 998 998 999 999 99 0 99 5 99 1 99 2 99 3 99 4 99 6 99 7 99 8 99 8 995 100 0 100 0 996 99 6 997 99 7 998 998 999 999 98 0 98 5 990 99 5 10 0 0 10 0 5 977 978 979981 982 983 98 4 98 6 98 7 98 8 989991 992 993 99 4 99 6 99 7 998 99 9 10 0 1 10 0 2 10 0 3 10 0 4 99 7 997 99 7 997 997 997 998 998 998 998 99 9 999 99 0 99 5 100 0 10 0 0 98 6 987 988 989 991 992 993 994 99 6 997 997 998 99 8 99 9 999 10 0 1 10 0 1 100 2 10 0 2 98 0 985 977 977 978 97 9 981 982 983 984 986987988989 980 976 977 978 979 97 5 98 0 985 972 973 97 4 97 6 97 7 97 8 97 9 98 1 982983 REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING REMOVE EXISTING POWER LINE REMOVE EXISTING FENCE REMOVE EXISTING VEGETATION DEMO EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD - COORDINATE EXTENTS OF REMOVAL WITH PROPOSED ROAD LOCATION SHOW ON SITE PLAN REMOVE EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD REMOVE EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD / PARKING AREA ON PROPERTY AFTER DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS REMOVE EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD / PARKING AREA ON PROPERTY AFTER DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS REMOVE EXISTING FENCE AND CONCRETE PAD REMOVE ALL EXISTING TREES FROM THIS TREE LINE AREA CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN ACCESS TO RESIDENCES AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION DEMO ROAD AND CLEAR SHOULDER AREA FOR ROAD EXPANSION - COORDINATE WITH SITE PLAN DEMO ROAD AND CLEAR SHOULDER AREA FOR ROAD EXPANSION - COORDINATE WITH SITE PLAN DEMO ROAD AND CLEAR SHOULDER AREA FOR ROAD EXPANSION - COORDINATE WITH SITE PLAN DEMO ROAD FOR WATER MAIN INSTALLATION DEMO ROAD FOR WATER MAIN INSTALLATION DEMO ROAD FOR WATER MAIN INSTALLATION SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 2 - D E M O P L A N . d w g F e b r u a r y 0 1 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 1 : 4 5 a m PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVE BUILDING REMOVE TREE REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES PROPERTY LINE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE EXISTING J-BARRIER EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SIGN EXISTING FLARED END SECTION EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVE EXISTING WELL EXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER EXISTING ROOF DRAIN EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING METAL COVER EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER EXISTING AIR CONDITIONER EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE EXISTING CABLE BOX EXISTING GUY WIRE EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE CLEARING & GRUBBING FILL & ABANDON UTILITY LINES EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER LEGEND FULL DEPTH SAWCUT 1.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 2.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. 5.THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK. 6.ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE WORK. 7.ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8.CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC. (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MEDINA, <COUNTY> COUNTY AND MN/DOT. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10.PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. 11.CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY WATER DEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED. 13.REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS. 14.ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES. 15.IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE OF MN REQUIREMENTS. 16.IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE. NO ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES NORTH Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call PR E P A R E D F O R O V E R A L L D E M O P L A N C200 CA T E S M E D I N A I N D U S T R I A L O P P I D A N M E D I N A M N DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 7 7 4 0 5 4 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 AS S H O W N ZT R M L S M C B DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . M I C H A E L C . B R A N D T , P . E . 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 42 6 6 1 W I L L O W D R I V E W I L L O W D R I V E C H I P P E W A R O A D CATES RANCH ROADCATES RANCH ROAD C H I P P E W A R O A D C H I P P E W A R O A D L O T 1 B L O C K 1 C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K L O T 2 B L O C K 1 C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K O U T L O T B C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K T T O U T L O T A C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K 30.0' 60.0'7.0' 10 0 . 0 ' 50 2 . 0 ' 262.0' PROPOSED ±131,746 SF BUILDING W/ 8 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED SCREEN BERM 262.0' 67 4 . 0 ' PROPOSED ±176,824 SF BUILDING W/ 15 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 60.0' 16.2' 64.0' 26 . 0 ' 359.5' 442.1' 295.4' 7.0' IMPACTED WETLAND 3 FUTURE TRAIL CONNECTION 12.0' 142.5' PROPOSED SCREEN WALL PROPOSED SCREEN WALL PROPOSED SCREEN WALL IMPACTED WETLAND 1 IMPACTED WETLAND 2 IMPACTED WETLAND 4 10 0 . 4 ' 439.8' 441.0' 287 . 0 ' 77 . 0 ' 11 5 . 5 ' 38 . 7 ' 127.2' 127.2' 12 5 . 6 ' 30 . 0 ' 19.0'26.0'19.0'11.0' 19.0'26.0'19.0' 36.5' 10.0' 46.5' 36.4' 10.0' 46.5' 10 . 0 ' 70.0' 26.0' 11.0' 7.0' 19.0'26.0'19.0' 19.0'26.0'19.0' 30.0 ' 30.0' 15 1 ' 18 1 ' 143' 180' 10 . 0 ' 10 . 0 ' PROPOSED RETAINING WALL, BY OTHERS 10 1 . 8 ' 21 . 0 ' 28 2 ' 18 3 ' 20 0 . 0 ' 10 0 . 0 ' 125' 17 1 ' 10 9 ' 12.0' 12.3' 12.0' 12.0' 12 . 0 ' 12 . 7 ' 12 . 0 ' 15 0 ' 16 4 ' 12.0' 12.0' 12.0' 53 . 5 ' 60 . 0 ' 52 0 . 0 ' 52 2 . 9 ' 26 . 0 ' SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 4 - S I T E P L A N - P R O O F O F P A R K I N G . d w g A p r i l 0 6 , 2 0 2 3 - 6 : 0 0 p m PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING RR-UR - RUAL RESIDENTIAL-URBAN RESERVE PROPOSED ZONING B - BUSINESS BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT = 50' RESIDENTIAL = 100' SIDE/REAR = 50' PARKING SETBACKS FRONT = 25' RESIDENTIAL = 50' SIDE = 25' REAR = 15' WEST BUILDING PROPOSED SETBACKS (PARKING / BUILDING) NORTH = NA / 100' WEST = 46.5' / 127.2' SOUTH = 53.5' EAST BUILDING PROPOSED SETBACKS (PARKING / BUILDING) NORTH = NA / 100.4' EAST = 359.5 / 442.1' SOUTH = NA / 77' BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 30.19 AC PROPOSED LOT 1 TOTAL AREA 7.68 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (LOT1)5.52 AC (71.88% OF PROPERTY AREA) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (LOT1)2.16 AC (28.13% OF PROPERTY AREA) WILLOW DRIVE DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY 0.22 AC PROPOSED LOT 2 TOTAL AREA 14.72 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (LOT 2)9.88 AC (67.12% OF PROPERTY AREA) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (LOT 2)4.84 AC (32.88% OF PROPERTY AREA) PROPOSED OUTLOT A TOTAL AREA 6.74 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (OUTLOT A) 2.34 AC (34.72% OF PROPERTY AREA) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (OUTLOT A) 4.40 AC (65.28% OF PROPERTY AREA PROPOSED OUTLOT B TOTAL AREA 0.82 AC PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (OUTLOT B) 0.33 AC (40.24% OF PROPERTY AREA) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA (OUTLOT B) 0.49 AC (59.76% OF PROPERTY AREA) BUILDING AREAS 7.08 AC (23.45% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) PARKING PROPOSED ASSOCIATE PARKING (LOT 1)92 SPACES PROPOSED ASSOCIATE PARKING (LOT 1) - WITH PROOF OF PARKING 144 SPACES PROPOSED ASSOCIATE PARKING (LOT 2)124 SPACES PROPOSED ASSOCIATE PARKING (LOT 2) - WITH PROOF OF PARKING 520 SPACES REQUIRED PARKING (LOT 1) PROOF OF PARKING COUNTS CAN SUPPORT 84% WAREHOUSE SPACE AND 16% OFFICE SPACE 0.84*131,746 SF = 110,667 SF 56 SPACES @ 1 SPACE / 2000 SF 0.16*131,746 SF = 21,079 SF 85 SPACES @ 1 SPACE / 250 SF TOTAL SPACES REQ'D = 141 SPACES REQUIRED PARKING (LOT 2) PROOF OF PARKING COUNTS CAN SUPPORT 31% WAREHOUSE SPACE AND 69% OFFICE SPACE 0.31*176,824 SF = 54,815 SF 28 SPACES @ 1 SPACE / 2000 SF 0.69*176,824 SF = 122,009 SF 489 SPACES @ 1 SPACE / 250 SF TOTAL SPACES REQ'D = 517 SPACES REQUIRED/PROPOSED ADA PARKING (LOT 1)3 SPACES / 4 SPACES REQUIRED/PROPOSED ADA PARKING (LOT2)4 SPACES / 4 SPACES PARKING AREA GREEN SPACE (PROOF OF PARKING CONSTRUCTION) AT LEAST 8% OF THE INTERIORS OF ALL SURFACE PARKING AREAS SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH BREAK OCCURRING APPROXIMATELY EVERY 20 STALLS WEST CAR PARK AREA 19,541 SF WEST CAR PARK LANDSCAPING REQUIRED: 1563 SF (8%) PROVIDED: 1843 SF (9.43%) CENTER TRUCK LOADING AND PARKING AREA 102,792 SF CENTER TRUCK LOADING AND PARKING LANDSCAPING REQUIRED: 8223 SF (8%) PROVIDED: 9,817 SF (9.6%) EAST CAR PARK AREA 160,924 SF EAST CAR PARK LANDSCAPING REQUIRED: 12,874 SF (8%) PROVIDED: 13,194 SF (8.2%) IMPACTED WETLAND SUMMARY IMPACTED WETLAND 1 TOTAL AREA = 36,520 SQ FT IMPACTED AREA = 691 SQ FT (1.89%) NON-IMPACTED AREA = 35,829 SQ FT IMPACTED WETLAND 2 (INCIDENTAL IMPACTS NO MITIGATION REQUIRED) TOTAL AREA = 11,567 SQ FT IMPACTED AREA = 11,567 SQ FT (100%) NON-IMPACTED AREA = 0 SQ FT IMPACTED WETLAND 3 (INCIDENTAL IMPACTS NO MITIGATION REQUIRED) TOTAL AREA = 21,635 SQ FT IMPACTED AREA = 2,147 SQ FT (9.92%) NON-IMPACTED AREA = 19,488 SQ FT IMPACTED WETLAND 4 TOTAL AREA = 6160 SQ FT IMPACTED AREA = 1018 SQ FT (16.5%) NON-IMPACTED AREA = 5142 SQ FT Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R NORTH 01 06 07 08 02 04 03 05 PR E P A R E D F O R O V E R A L L S I T E P L A N C400 CA T E S M E D I N A I N D U S T R I A L O P P I D A N M E D I N A M N DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . M I C H A E L C . B R A N D T , P . E . 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 42 6 6 1 SITE PLAN NOTES 1.REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF STOOPS, TRUCK DOCKS, TRASH ENCLOSURES & PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS. REFER TO THE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LIGHT POLES, CONDUITS, AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. 2.REFER TO CERTIFIED SITE SURVEY OR PLAT FOR EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTING EASEMENTS, PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, AND ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY & PARCEL INFORMATION. 3.DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE DRAWN TO THE FACE OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT, AND AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 4.UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATING EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED WORK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TRAFFIC SIGNS, LIGHT POLES, ABOVEGROUND UTILITIES, ETC. PERFORM WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 5.TYPICAL PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE 9.0-FEET IN WIDTH AND 19-FEET IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 6.MONUMENT SIGN(S) ARE DETAILED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIGN DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND REQUIRED PERMITS WITH THE OWNER. PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE LEGEND DELINEATED WETLAND PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED IRRIGATED LANDSCAPE AREA DELINEATED WETLAND SETBACK PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACT DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 7 7 4 0 5 4 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 AS S H O W N ZT R M L S M C BWETLAND SUMMARY TOTAL REGULATED WETLANDS ON PROPERTY 42,680 SF (0.98 AC) TOTAL IMPACTED WETLAND 1,709 SF (0.04 AC) (4.08 % OF TOTAL WETLAND) RIGHT-OF-WAY W I L L O W D R I V E W I L L O W D R I V E C H I P P E W A R O A D CATES RANCH ROADCATES RANCH ROAD C H I P P E W A R O A D C H I P P E W A R O A D T T SS-16 RE:982.02 IE:980.50 W SS-37 SS-38 SS-39 RE:998.07 IE:984.85 NW IE:984.85 E SS-47 SS-46 SS-49 SS-50 98 0 98 5 99 0 995 995 995 995 995 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 1000 1000 976 976 977 97897 8 97 8 97 9 98 1 982 98 3 98 4 986 987 988 989 991 992 993 994 994 994 996 996 99 6 996 996 997997 997 997 99 7 997 997 998 998 99 8 998 998 99 8 998 99 9 999 99 9 99 9 99 9 999 999 1001 100 1 1002 1002 100 3 1003 10 0 4 1004 995 99 4 996 997 998 99 599 6 990 991 992 993 994 995 992 993 994 996 997 995 994996997 995 99 2 993 994 996 996 997 997 998 998 10 0 0 10 0 1 100 2 10 0 2 100 0 999 10 0 1 99 5 993 994 996 997 99 5 99 4 996 99 6 997 997 99 7 99 7 99 8 998 998 99 8 996 997 998 999 998 999 997 998995 994 996 997 99 5 99 4 99 699 799 8 99 6 99 7 99 8 99 9 995 994 995 995 994 994 996 996 997 99 8 10 0 0 99 8 99 9 997 997 998 11.4' PROPOSED ±131,746 SF BUILDING W/8 DOCK STALLS FFE =997.0 PROPOSED ±176,824 SF BUILDING W/15 DOCK STALLS FFE =997.0 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE OVER EXISTING STUB TO CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ELEVATIONS AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. PROPOSED 8" PVC C-900 WATER MAIN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING 12" DIP WATER MAIN PROPOSED 12" FUSIBLE PVC C-900 WATER MAIN EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED 12" FUSIBLE PVC C-900 WATER MAIN PROPOSED 12" PVC C-900 WATER MAIN PROPOSED 12" PVC C-900 WATER MAIN PROPOSED 8" PVC C-900 WATER MAIN PROPOSED 8" PVC C-900 WATER MAIN PROPOSED 12" PVC C-900 WATER MAIN PROPOSED 8" PVC C-900 WATER MAIN CONNECT TO EXISTING 12" WATER MAIN - FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND MATERIAL PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION TO BUILDING PROPOSED 6" WATER PIPE WITH 6" VALVE TO FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED 8" PVC C-900 WATER MAIN PROPOSED 12" FUSIBLE PVC C-900 WATER MAIN EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED 10" PVC C-900 WATER SERVICE TO BUILDING PROPOSED 10" PVC C-900 WATER SERVICE TO BUILDING PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION TO BUILDING PROPOSED 8" PVC C-900 WATER MAIN PROPOSED 12" PVC C-900 WATER PIPE STUB WET TAP CONNECTION TO EXISTING WATER LINE WET TAP CONNECTION TO EXISTING WATER LINE PROPOSED 6" WATER PIPE WITH 6" VALVE TO FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED 6" WATER PIPE WITH 6" VALVE TO FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED 6" WATER PIPE WITH 6" VALVE TO FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED 6" WATER PIPE WITH 6" VALVE TO FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION TO BUILDING PROPOSED 6" WATER PIPE WITH 6" VALVE TO FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED 6" WATER PIPE WITH 6" VALVE TO FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED 6" WATER PIPE WITH 6" VALVE TO FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED 6" WATER PIPE WITH 6" VALVE TO FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED 6" WATER PIPE WITH 6" VALVE TO FIRE HYDRANT 990 995 988 989991992 993 994 990 995 989 991 992 993 99 4 996 99 5 99 5 99 2 99 2 99 2 99 2 99 3 99 3 99 4 99 4 99 6 99 6 99 6 99 7 995 992 993 994 996 997 99 5 99 5 99 5 99 5 DIRECTIONAL DRILL SANITARY SEWER LINE UNDER CHIPPEWA ROAD DIRECTIONAL DRILL WATER PIPES IN RIGHT OF WAY SOUTH OF CHIPPEWA ROAD AND WHERE THE WATER MAIN CROSSES CHIPPEWA ROAD PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER - PROVIDE INSULATION WHERE GROUND COVER LESS THAN SIX FEET 348 LF - 8" PVC @ 1.25% SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 6 - U T I L I T Y P L A N . d w g F e b r u a r y 0 1 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 1 : 5 6 a m PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1.ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES. 2.SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP 6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-1785 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 3.WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER ANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241. 4.MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 5.ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 6.ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. 8.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 9.LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFILLING. 10.TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS. 11.ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I. 12.EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES. 13.REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. 14.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF MEDINA AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. 15.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 16.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 19.BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20.ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. 21.ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION BLOCKING. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER LEGEND CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO EXISTING PROPOSED DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . M I C H A E L C . B R A N D T , P . E . 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 42 6 6 1 PR E P A R E D F O R O V E R A L L U T I L I T Y P L A N C600 CA T E S M E D I N A I N D U S T R I A L O P P I D A N M E D I N A M N 01 06 07 08 02 04 03 05 01 06 07 08 02 04 03 05 Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call NORTH DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 7 7 4 0 5 4 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 AS S H O W N ZT R M L S M C B 99 0 99 1 99 2 99 3 99 4 99 5 10 0 0 99 6 99 7 99 8 99 9 985 990 995 982 983 984 986 987 988 988 988 98 9 99 1 992 993 994 996 997 998 99 8 980 979 981 980 985 99 0 978 979 981 982 983 984 986 987 988 989 99 1 99 2 993 995 99 6 99 7 99 8 98 0 98 0 985 985 990 995 99 5 995 1000 100 0 97 8 97 8 97 9 97 9 98 1 981 982 98 2 98 3 98 3 984 984 986 986 987 987 988 988 98 9 989 991 992 99 3 994 99 4 99 4 996 997 998 999 10 0 1 1001 10 0 2 1002 10 0 0 100 5 99 7 99 8 99 9 10 0 1 10 0 2 10 0 2 1002 100 3 10 0 4 1006 997 997 99 7 997 998 998 998 998 999 999 99 9 99 9 976 976 977 97 5 98 0 985 972 97 3 97 4 97 6 977 978 97 9 98 1 98 2 98 3 98 4 986 987 988 W I L L O W D R I V E W I L L O W D R I V E C H I P P E W A R O A D CATES RANCH ROAD CATES RANCH ROAD C H I P P E W A R O A D C H I P P E W A R O A D L O T 1 B L O C K 1 C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K L O T 2 B L O C K 1 C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K O U T L O T B C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K T T O U T L O T A C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K 996 98 0 98 5 97 6 97 7 97 8 97 9 98 1 98 2 98 3 98 4 995 996 99 5 99 6 99 7 99 7 99 7 99 8 99 8 99 8 99 9 99 3 99 2 99 2 1.20%1.20% 1.20% 1.20% 1.5 9 % 2.36% 5. 2 2 % 2.54% 24.16% 24.83% 10.01% 33.33% 25 . 0 5 % 6.9 8 % 3. 5 1 % 8. 5 3 % 6.9 6 % 99 5 99 6 99 7 995 996997 996 997 999 99 9 10 0 1 99 5 99 2 99 3 99 4 99 6 99 7 10 0 0 99 6 99 7 99 8 99 9 99 6 990 995 986986 987 988 989 991 992 993 994 985 982983984 986987988 992 993 994 99 5 99 3 99 4 99 6 99 7 99 5 99 6 99 6 99 7 99 7 99 8 99 8 99 9 99 9 98 5 99 0 99 5 98 4 98 6 98 7 98 8 98 9 99 1 99 2 99 3 99 4 98 0 98 1 98 2 98 3 97 6 97 7 97 8 97 9 22.03% 25.00% 2.1 9 % 33 . 3 7 % 1.50% 2.60% 2.27% 1.93% 2.50% 3.08% 2.24% 1.7 4 % 13 . 7 6 % 4.9 7 % 1.20%1.20% 1.20% 1.20%1.20% 4. 8 7 % 2. 0 6 % 4.92 % 11 . 9 0 % 3.2 6 % 7.53% 2.15% 2.03% 1.74% 2.05% 25 . 0 0 % D D D D RD 106 RD 203 RD 105 RD 102 RD 101 RD 205 RD 204 RD 206 STMH 3 RD 202 CB 1 STMH 20 CBMH 2 CBMH 15 CBMH 11 CBMH 22 CB 14 CB 24 CB 26 CBMH 12 STMH 21 RD 104 RD 103 RD 201 RD 107 RD 207 RD 208 CBMH 10 CBMH 19 CBMH 6 CBMH 18 CBMH 8 STMH 16 FES 23 FES 13 FES 27 FES 25 D 33.50% D PROPOSED ±131,746 SF BUILDING W/ 8 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 PROPOSED ±176,824 SF BUILDING W/ 15 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 BMP #1 - DETENTION BASIN BASIN BOTTOM: 975.00 NWL: 980.00 TOP OF POND: 982.00 100-YR HWL: 981.89 CBMH 7 STMH 5 CB 4 STMH 31 FES 32 CB 9 FES 30 FES 29 CBMH 28 FES 21.1 CBMH 17 99 5 99 1 99 1 99 2 99 2 99 4 996 997 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 997.00 993.00 993.00 997.00 997.00 996.50996.50996.50996.50 996.50 997.00 996.50 996.50 997.00 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 997.00 993.00 993.00 996.50 996.21 994.57 994.29 994.79 995.03 993.90 994.79 994.29 994.49 995.75 995.75 995.75 995.75 995.75 995.75 995.73 995.58995.35 996.29 996.24 994.12 994.79 993.83 994.79 993.83 994.79 993.83 994.49 994.72 992.28 991.25 991.86 991.36 991.86 991.36 991.75 992.28 992.28 992.28 992.28 992.28 992.28 992.28 995.39 992.28 995.75 995.75 991.81 996.50 996.50 996.50 ??? 986.54 996.38 985.67 992.29 992.28 991.57 993.00 992.32992.67 993.00 993.00 993.00 993.00 993.00 995.75 994.48 994.76 995.45 992.28 992.52 995.75 995.75 995.75 995.75 996.87 994.15 992.28 992.28 992.28 992.28 992.28 991.46 995.75 990.83 992.11 996.90 994.63 994.67 995.75 995.75 995.43 994.98 994.56 994.51 995.75 995.75 995.38 994.89 995.75 995.75 994.39 994.48 994.83 995.36 995.75 995.75 994.15 994.36 994.58 995.25 995.75 995.75 994.29 994.31 994.41 995.18 995.75 995.75 994.69 994.60 994.95 995.47 995.75 995.75 994.63 994.72 994.96 995.45 996.49 999.65 999.70 996.72 994.94 995.27 995.27 994.72 993.08 992.47 994.11 993.58 990.44 988.92 987.98 987.77 989.84 988.87 988.03 985.94986.19986.24 986.78 992.22 992.24 995.11 994.48 995.41 994.70 996.81 996.76 996.49 996.45 996.99 997.35 997.51 995.20 993.71 993.67 992.87 1000.46 1001.40 1002.06 1000.78 998.41 995.83 992.37 992.19 992.64 987.37 997.42 997.57 996.56 996.71 996.74 996.89 997.97 998.12 995.40 993.37 992.27 993.90 998.68 996.85 997.15 998.73 SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 5 - G R A D I N G P L A N . d w g F e b r u a r y 0 1 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 1 : 5 4 a m PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y GRADING PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13.UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 14.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15.GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18.ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19.ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D PROPOSED RIDGE LINE PROPOSED SWALE PROPOSED TOP/BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION TW:0.0 BW:0.0 Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . M I C H A E L C . B R A N D T , P . E . 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 42 6 6 1 PR E P A R E D F O R O V E R A L L G R A D I N G & D R A I N A G E P L A N C500 CA T E S M E D I N A I N D U S T R I A L O P P I D A N M E D I N A M N NORTH 01 06 07 08 02 04 03 05 AREA KEY MAP NORTH NTS 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 7 7 4 0 5 4 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 AS S H O W N ZT R M L S M C B W I L L O W D R I V E CAT E S R A N C H R O A D L O T 1 B L O C K 1 C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K O U T L O T B C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K 98 0 98 0 985 985 990 995 97 897 8 97 9 97 9 98 1 981 982 98 2 98 3 98 3 984 984 986 986 987 987 988 988 98 9 989 991 992 993 100 5 100 3 10 0 4 1006 990 988989 991 992 99 2 1.20% 6.9 8 % 6.3 3 % 8. 5 3 % 6.9 6 % 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 993.00 997.00 997.00 996.50 996.50996.50 996.50 996.50 994.57 994.29 994.79 995.75 995.75 995.75 992.28 996.50 1002.47 986.54 992.29 995.45 992.52 992.28 992.28 994.56 994.51 995.75 995.75 993.08 992.47 994.11 993.58 990.44 988.92 987.98 987.77 990.81 989.84 988.87 988.03 985.94 987.15 987.21 986.97 990 995 986986 987 988 989 991 992 993 994 996 997 975 980 985 976 977 978 979 981 982 983 984 986 987 988 1.20% 1.20% 1. 9 3 % 5.0 9 % 2. 0 6 % 4.92 % 9. 2 1 % 2. 6 5 % 1.74% 2.05% 976 976 977 D 94 LF - 18" HDPE @ 1.22% 105 LF - 18" HDPE @ 1.22% 78 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 996.14 995.03 989.33 988.12 992.28 994.86 90 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% D 66 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.70% 64 LF - 18" HDPE @ 2.10% 9. 5 0 % 4.6 9 % 7. 7 6 % 9. 0 0 % 994.90 994.85 994.88 994.82 995.38 995.44 995.39 995.45 995.29 TW:986.30 BW:975.85 TW:987.20 BW:975.42 TW:977.64 BW:977.04 TW:980.10 BW:976.68 TW:981.85 BW:976.49 TW:983.71 BW:976.34 TW:987.09 BW:974.99 TW:987.00 BW:974.64 TW:986.92 BW:974.70 TW:986.82 BW:975.02 TW:986.76 BW:975.25 TW:986.66 BW:975.65 1001.80 997.01 995.63 992.37 99 0 995 10 0 0 987988 98 9 99 1 99 2 99 3 994 996 997 998 999 272 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.70% 99 5 99 2 99 3 99 4 99 6 99 7 D 147 LF - 24" RCP @ 2.00% 79 LF - 24" RCP @ 2.00% 83 LF - 15" RCP @ 6.05% PROPOSED ±131,746 SF BUILDING W/ 8 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 995 99 1 99 2 993 994 996 996 EOF:994.90 EOF:994.72 995 99 2 99 3 99 4 99 6 990 995 987 98 8 989 991 992 99 3 993 99 4 99 4 10 . 3 5 % 150 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.22% RD 102 RE:996.43 STMH 3 RE:995.45 CBMH 2 RE:994.29 RD 104 RE:992.94 CB 4 RE:989.11 CB 9 RE:988.08 STMH 31 RE:987.14 FES 32 RE:974.33 FES 33 RE:992.52 FES 34 RE:987.52 99 0 995 98 6 98 7 98 8 98 9 99 1 99 2 993 994 996 997 98 2 983 11,567 SF OF IMPACTED WETLAND 10 0 0 99 6 99 7 99 8 99 9 10 0 1 10 0 2 100 2 10 0 3 STMH 5 RE:994.40 1000.45 987.37 SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 5 - G R A D I N G P L A N E N L A R G E M E N T S . d w g F e b r u a r y 0 1 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 1 : 5 5 a m PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE GRADING PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13.UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 14.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15.GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18.ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19.ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D PROPOSED RIDGE LINE PROPOSED SWALE PROPOSED TOP/BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION TW:0.0 BW:0.0 Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . M I C H A E L C . B R A N D T , P . E . 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 42 6 6 1 PR E P A R E D F O R G R A D I N G P L A N E N L A R G E M E N T S C501 CA T E S M E D I N A I N D U S T R I A L O P P I D A N M E D I N A M N AREA KEY MAP NORTH NTS 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 NORTH 02 03 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 7 7 4 0 5 4 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 AS S H O W N ZT R M L S M C B C H I P P E W A R O A D W I L L O W D R I V E L O T 1 T 995 99 5 995 1000 100 0 992 993 994 99 4 994 996 997 998 999 10 0 1 1001 10 0 2 1002 10 0 0 99 7 99 8 99 9 10 0 1 10 0 2 1002 100 3 10 0 4 99 7 997 998 99 5 99 6 99 7 99 7 99 7 99 8 99 8 99 8 99 9 1.20% 1.5 9 % 2.36% 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 997.00 993.00 995.03 993.90 994.79 994.29 994.49 995.75 995.75 995.75 995.35 991.75 992.28 992.28 996.50 1002.47 995.92 992.67 995.75 992.28 992.28 995.75 996.90 994.63 994.67 995.75 995.75 995.49 996.49999.42 999.55 996.72 994.94 995.27 995.27 996.49 995.20 993.71 99 5 99 6 995 996 997 996 997 999 99 9 10 0 1 99 5 99 2 99 3 99 4 99 6 99 7 1.20% 7.53% 2.15% 2.03% D 99 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.79% 174 LF - 36" HDPE @ 0.75% 75 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.75% 135 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.75% 90 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 90 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 78 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 78 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 78 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 992.28 995.75 991.86 992.32 992.32 992.28 992.28 994.91 994.97 994.94 995.43 995.42 995.46 995.27 995.27 995.89 994.95 994.73 995.87 996.99 996.91 997.09 996.84 996.76 996.61 996.63 996.11 995.72 994.56 995.74 1001.80 992.28 993.00 993.00 270 LF - 48" HDPE @ 0.75% PROPOSED ±131,746 SF BUILDING W/ 8 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 995 996 996 997 999 EOF:994.98 EOF:994.15 997 99 7 99 7 998 RD 106 RE:996.43 RD 105 RE:996.43 RD 101 RE:996.43 CB 1 RE:994.54 CBMH 15 RE:994.29 CB 14 RE:994.02 RD 103 RE:992.94 RD 107 RE:992.94 STMH 16 RE:995.95 CBMH 17 RE:989.49 995 99 2 993 994 996 99 5 99 5 99 4 99 6 99 7 99 3 10 0 0 10 0 1 10 0 2 100 0 99 6 997 99 8 99 9 995 995 992 992 993 993 994 994 996 996 997 995 996 997 998.72 1001.15 1002.30 SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 5 - G R A D I N G P L A N E N L A R G E M E N T S . d w g F e b r u a r y 0 1 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 1 : 5 5 a m PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE GRADING PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13.UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 14.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15.GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18.ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19.ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D PROPOSED RIDGE LINE PROPOSED SWALE PROPOSED TOP/BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION TW:0.0 BW:0.0 Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . M I C H A E L C . B R A N D T , P . E . 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 42 6 6 1 PR E P A R E D F O R G R A D I N G P L A N E N L A R G E M E N T S C502 CA T E S M E D I N A I N D U S T R I A L O P P I D A N M E D I N A M N AREA KEY MAP NORTH NTS 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 NORTH 01 04 03 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 7 7 4 0 5 4 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 AS S H O W N ZT R M L S M C B CATES RANCH ROAD L O T 1 B L O C K 1 L O T 2 B L O C K 1 C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K T 980 985 99 0 978 979 981 982 983 984 986 987 988 989 99 1 99 2 990 995 1000 987 988 989 991 992 993 994 1001 1002 99 2 99 2 1.20% 1.20% 8. 5 3 % 6.9 6 % 993.00 997.00 997.00 996.50 996.50996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 997.00 993.00 991.36 EOF:991.86 991.36992.28 992.28 992.28 992.28 992.28 995.75 991.81 986.54 EOF:985.67 992.29 993.00 993.00 993.00 992.52 992.28 992.28 992.28 992.28 990.83 992.11 995.75 995.75 995.75 987.77 990.81 989.84 988.87 988.03 985.94 987.15 987.21 986.97 992.22 992.24 990 995 986986 987 988 989 991 992 993 994 996 997 975 976 977 978 979 992 993 994 99 599 3 99 4 99 6 99 7 2.1 9 % 60 1 . 1 2 % 1.20% 1.20% 1.20%1.20% 1. 9 3 % 5.0 9 % 2. 0 6 % 976 976 977 200 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.69% 114 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.69%289 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.69% 90 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 90 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 90 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 989.33 988.12 992.28 992.32 993.00 992.28 90 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 90 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 64 LF - 18" HDPE @ 2.10% 992.32 992.32 992.28 992.28 TW:988.76 TW:989.91 TW:990.76 TW:992.31 TW:992.55 TW:992.95 TW:993.34 TW:993.85 TW:994.33 TW:994.82 TW:995.13 BW:989.50 BW:983.48 BW:980.78 BW:980.33 BW:978.93 BW:979.58 BW:979.97 BW:982.52 BW:981.62 BW:981.18 BW:980.74 TW:986.30 BW:975.85 TW:986.30 BW:976.50 TW:987.20 BW:975.42 TW:977.64 BW:977.04 TW:978.00 BW:977.54TW:980.10 BW:976.68 TW:981.85 BW:976.49 TW:983.71 BW:976.34 TW:987.09 BW:974.99 TW:987.00 BW:974.64 TW:986.92 BW:974.70 TW:986.82 BW:975.02 TW:986.76 BW:975.25 TW:986.66 BW:975.65 TW:986.53 BW:976.21 98 0 98 5 97 797 897 9 98 1 98 298 398 4 98 6 986 987 993.00 993.00 272 LF - 24" HDPE @ 0.70% 99 5 99 2 99 3 99 4 99 6 99 7 EOF:991.57 D 147 LF - 24" RCP @ 2.00% 79 LF - 24" RCP @ 2.00% PROPOSED ±131,746 SF BUILDING W/ 8 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 PROPOSED ±176,824 SF BUILDING W/ 15 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 987 10 . 3 5 % RD 203 RE:996.43 RD 202 RE:992.94 RD 104 RE:992.94 RD 103 RE:992.94 RD 201 RE:992.94 CBMH 10 RE:992.82 CBMH 6 RE:991.36 CBMH 8 RE:991.21 CBMH 7 RE:991.36 CB 9 RE:988.08 FES 30 RE:978.83 STMH 31 RE:987.14 FES 32 RE:974.33 11,567 SF OF IMPACTED WETLAND 70 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.69% 70 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.69% 691 SF OF IMPACTED WETLAND 2,147 SF OF IMPACTED WETLAND SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 5 - G R A D I N G P L A N E N L A R G E M E N T S . d w g F e b r u a r y 0 1 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 1 : 5 5 a m PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE GRADING PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13.UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 14.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15.GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18.ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19.ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D PROPOSED RIDGE LINE PROPOSED SWALE PROPOSED TOP/BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION TW:0.0 BW:0.0 Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . M I C H A E L C . B R A N D T , P . E . 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 42 6 6 1 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 7 7 4 0 5 4 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 ## # # # # # # ZT R M L S M C B PR E P A R E D F O R G R A D I N G P L A N E N L A R G E M E N T S C503 CA T E S M E D I N A I N D U S T R I A L O P P I D A N M E D I N A M N AREA KEY MAP NORTH NTS 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 NORTH04 05 01 02 C H I P P E W A R O A D T 99 0 99 1 99 2 99 3 99 4 99 5 99 3 995 100 0 994 99 4 996 997 998 999 10 0 1 10 0 2 1002 99 7 997 99 5 99 6 99 7 99 7 1.20% 1.20% 1.5 9 % 2.36% 5. 2 2 % 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 997.00 993.00 997.00 996.50 996.50 997.00 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 993.00 996.50 996.21995.73 995.58 995.35 992.28 991.25 991.86 991.75 992.28 992.28 992.28 996.50 995.92 992.28 993.00 992.32992.67 993.00 993.00 992.28 992.28 995.75 995.75 996.49 996.45 996.99 997.35 995.20 993.71 993.67 992.87 995 996 997 999 99 9 10 0 1 99 5 99 2 99 3 99 4 99 6 99 7 10 0 0 99 6 99 7 99 8 99 9 1. 5 7 % ??? 9.3 9 % 3.7 0 % 1.20% 25 . 0 0 % D 99 LF - 18" HDPE @ 0.79% 158 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.79% 299 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.79% 90 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 90 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 96 LF - 6" PVC @ 2.00% 992.28 992.32 993.00 992.28 991.86 992.32 992.28 992.32 992.28 992.32 995.26 995.47 994.59 995.37 995.89 994.95 994.73 994.56 995.74 995.22 994.44 995.32 995.11 992.28 270 LF - 48" HDPE @ 0.75% 93 LF - 15" RCP @ 2.00% PROPOSED ±131,746 SF BUILDING W/ 8 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 PROPOSED ±176,824 SF BUILDING W/ 15 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 993 994 99 5 99 4 994 EOF:991.46 RD 206 RE:996.42 STMH 20 RE:994.83 RD 107 RE:992.94 RD 207 RE:992.94 RD 208 RE:994.49 CBMH 19 RE:991.75 CBMH 18 RE:991.25 FES 21.1 RE:995.52 995 992 992 993 993 994 996 995 996 997 1,018 SF OF IMPACTED WETLAND SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 5 - G R A D I N G P L A N E N L A R G E M E N T S . d w g F e b r u a r y 0 1 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 1 : 5 5 a m PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE GRADING PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13.UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 14.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15.GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18.ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19.ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D PROPOSED RIDGE LINE PROPOSED SWALE PROPOSED TOP/BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION TW:0.0 BW:0.0 Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . M I C H A E L C . B R A N D T , P . E . 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 42 6 6 1 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 7 7 4 0 5 4 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 ## # # # # # # ZT R M L S M C B PR E P A R E D F O R G R A D I N G P L A N E N L A R G E M E N T S C504 CA T E S M E D I N A I N D U S T R I A L O P P I D A N M E D I N A M N AREA KEY MAP NORTH NTS 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 NORTH 02 03 05 06 07 L O T 2 985 990 982 983 984 986 987 988 98 9 99 1 992 993 980 979 981 98 0 98 5 97 6 97 7 97 8 97 9 98 1 98 2 98 3 98 4 22.90% 24.83% 10.01% 33.33% 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50996.50 996.50 994.79 994.79 993.83 994.49 994.72 995.75 994.76 995.75 995.75 995.75 995.75 995.75 994.59 994.95 995.75 995.75 994.29 994.31 994.41 995.18 995.75 995.75 994.63 994.72 994.95 995.11 994.48 995.41 994.70 994 99 5 99 6 99 6 99 7 99 7 99 8 99 8 99 9 99 9 98 5 99 0 99 5 98 4 98 6 98 7 98 8 98 9 99 1 99 2 99 3 99 4 98 0 98 1 98 2 98 3 97 6 97 7 97 8 97 9 25.00% 60 1 . 1 2 % 1.93% 2.38% 2.27% 93 LF - 18" RCP @ 7.00% 289 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.69% 100 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.68% 99 LF - 30" RCP @ 0.69% 78 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 78 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 110 LF - 18" RCP @ 7.00% 78 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 995.51 995.46 995.45 995.49 994.91 994.93 994.86 995.51 995.46 995.45 995.49 994.87 994.98 994.96 TW:993.85 TW:994.33 TW:994.82 TW:995.13 TW:994.79 TW:994.93 TW:995.06 TW:995.33 BW:995.26 BW:982.52 BW:981.62 BW:981.18 BW:980.74 BW:979.55 BW:986.93 BW:988.63 67 LF - 48" RCP @ 0.37% PROPOSED ±176,824 SF BUILDING W/ 15 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 EOF:994.33 EOF:994.33 EOF:994.33 994.67 BMP #1 - DETENTION BASIN BASIN BOTTOM: 975.00 NWL: 980.00 TOP OF POND: 982.00 100-YR HWL: 981.89 RD 203 RE:996.43 RD 205 RE:996.43 RD 204 RE:996.43 CBMH 11 RE:994.71 CB 24 RE:993.83 CB 26 RE:993.83 CBMH 12 RE:993.83 FES 13 RE:982.88 FES 27 RE:981.79 FES 25 RE:981.79 CBMH 28 RE:983.17 FES 29 RE:982.50 SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 5 - G R A D I N G P L A N E N L A R G E M E N T S . d w g F e b r u a r y 0 1 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 1 : 5 5 a m PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE GRADING PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13.UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 14.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15.GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18.ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19.ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D PROPOSED RIDGE LINE PROPOSED SWALE PROPOSED TOP/BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION TW:0.0 BW:0.0 Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . M I C H A E L C . B R A N D T , P . E . 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 42 6 6 1 PR E P A R E D F O R G R A D I N G P L A N E N L A R G E M E N T S C505 CA T E S M E D I N A I N D U S T R I A L O P P I D A N M E D I N A M N AREA KEY MAP NORTH NTS 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 03 NORTH 04 06 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 7 7 4 0 5 4 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 AS S H O W N ZT R M L S M C B O U T L O T A C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K 99 0 99 1 99 2 99 3 99 4 99 5 10 0 0 99 6 99 7 99 8 99 9 995 992 993 994 996 997 998 99 8 2.54% 25 . 0 5 % 996.50 997.00 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.50 996.29 996.24 994.79 995.39 995.75 994.48 995.75 995.75 994.31 995.18 995.75 995.75 994.36 994.44 994.70 996.81 996.76 99 6 22.03% 25.00% 1.93% 2.58% 3.08% 2.24% 1.7 4 % 1. 5 7 % 3.7 0 % D 71 LF - 30" HDPE @ 0.79% 156 LF - 36" RCP @ 0.79% 75 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 78 LF - 12" PVC @ 2.00% 995.42 995.35 995.35 995.40 994.80 994.81 994.77 995.44 995.48 994.53 995.19 997.15 994.36 995.26 995.47 995.32 995.11 994.21 995.04 997.00 996.18 997.42 998.01 998.16 997.57 996.33 93 LF - 15" RCP @ 2.00% PROPOSED ±176,824 SF BUILDING W/ 15 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 99 4 EOF:994.59 99 7 99 8 998 998.12 998.00 995.83 996.43 BMP #1 - DETENTION BASIN BASIN BOTTOM: 975.00 NWL: 980.00 TOP OF POND: 982.00 100-YR HWL: 981.89 RD 206 RE:996.42 CBMH 22 RE:994.09 CB 24 RE:993.83 STMH 21 RE:996.22 FES 23 RE:983.42 FES 21.1 RE:995.52 SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 5 - G R A D I N G P L A N E N L A R G E M E N T S . d w g F e b r u a r y 0 1 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 1 : 5 5 a m PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE GRADING PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF MEDINA, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13.UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 14.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15.GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18.ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19.ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D PROPOSED RIDGE LINE PROPOSED SWALE PROPOSED TOP/BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION TW:0.0 BW:0.0 Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . M I C H A E L C . B R A N D T , P . E . 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 42 6 6 1 PR E P A R E D F O R G R A D I N G P L A N E N L A R G E M E N T S C506 CA T E S M E D I N A I N D U S T R I A L O P P I D A N M E D I N A M N AREA KEY MAP NORTH NTS 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 NORTH 04 05 08 07 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 7 7 4 0 5 4 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 AS S H O W N ZT R M L S M C B CONIFEROUS TREE CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ROOT SIZE BHS 13 PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA`BLACK HILLS SPRUCE B & B 6` HT. CBS 14 PICEA PUNGENS COLORADO SPRUCE B & B 6` HT. ERC 17 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA EASTERN RED CEDAR B & B 6` HT. WHC 11 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS `WHITE CEDAR`WHITE CEDAR B & B 6` HT. WHP 21 PINUS STROBUS WHITE PINE B & B 6` HT. ORNAMENTAL TREE CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ROOT SIZE ALS 14 AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA `AUTUMN BRILLANCE`AUTUMN BRILLANCE SERVICEBERRY B & B 6` HT. IRW 11 OSTRYA VIRGINIANA IRONWOOD B & B 1.5" CAL. QUA 19 POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN B & B 1.5" CAL. SSC 3 MALUS X `SPRING SNOW`SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE B & B 1.75" CAL MIN TCH 6 CRATAEGUS CRUS-GALLI INERMIS TM THORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN B & B 1.5" CAL. OVERSTORY TREE CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ROOT SIZE BOL 13 TILIA AMERICANA `BOULEVARD`BOULEVARD LINDEN B & B 2.5" CAL. HCK 12 CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS COMMON HACKBERRY B & B 2.5" CAL. IHL 17 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR. INERMIS `IMPERIAL`IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST B & B 2.5" CAL. SWO 15 QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAK B & B 2.5" CAL. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ROOT SIZE SGJ 28 JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SEA GREEN`SEA GREEN JUNIPER #5 CONT.5` O.C. TAU 44 TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTONII`TAUTON YEW #5 CONT.5` O.C. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ROOT SIZE AJN 19 PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `JEFAM`AMBER JUBILEE NINEBARK #5 CONT.4` O.C. ANH 12 HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS `ANNABELLE`ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA #5 CONT.4` O.C. BLC 44 ARONIA MELANOCARPA `IROQUOIS BEAUTY` TM IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY #5 CONT.4` O.C. Dbh 45 DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT.3` O.C. LDN 41 PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `DONNA MAY` TM LITTLE DEVIL NINEBARK #5 CONT.4` O.C. RTD 30 CORNUS SERICEA `BAILEYI`RED TWIG DOGWOOD #5 CONT.5` O.C. SEM 15 SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA `SEM`SEM FALSESPIREA #5 CONT.3` O.C. PERENNIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING BES 155 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM`BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT 18" O.C. BHG 201 SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM `BLUE HEAVEN`BLUE HEAVEN LITTLE BLUESTEM #1 CONT 24" O.C. KFG 140 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT 30" O.C. PDS 86 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT 24" O.C. WLC 97 NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW`WALKERS LOW CATMINT #1 CONT 30" O.C. WSE 89 ECHINACEA PURPUREA `WHITE SWAN`WHITE SWAN CONEFLOWER #1 CONT.24" O.C. PLANT SCHEDULE SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ L 1 - L A N D S C A P E D E T A I L S . D W G F e b r u a r y 0 1 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 2 : 0 2 p m PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH NOTES: 2X ROOT BALL WIDTH SOD 4" TOPSOIL PREPARED PLANTING BED AND BACKFILL SOIL (THOROUGHLY LOOSENED) NOTES: 1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT. 3.REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT AND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 4.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 5.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 6.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 7.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 8.MIX IN 3-4" OF ORGANIC COMPOST. 1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING. 3.SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. 4.SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6" INTERVALS. 5.BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT. REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 6.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 7.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 8.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 9.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 10.FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. PLANTING SOIL ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN. EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTH A MINIMUM OF 6" BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. FINISHED GRADE EDGER, AS SPECIFIED TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1081 SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1082 1/ 2 " FINISHED GRADE AT LAWN, 1/2" BELOW TOP OF DIVIDER. LAWN SIDE "BLACK DIAMOND" EDGING BY VALEEY VIEW SPECIALTIES CO. USE 20 FT. LENGTHS. USE KNURLED CONNECTOR AT SPLICES, USE CORNER, TEE, VEE, OR WIDE ANBLE CONNECTORS AT ANGLE 10" X 7/8" METAL ANCHOR STAKES AT 48" O.C., AND AT CHANGES. EACH END. PLASTIC DIVIDER: FINISHED GRADE AT SHRUBS/ PERENNIALS, 1" BELOW TOP OF DIVIDER. PLANTING BED 1" POLY EDGER DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1083 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6.ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7.PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8.PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10.PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLARE IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLARE. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLARE SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 12.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16.BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (LOAM TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND NATURAL IN COLOR, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE RIVER ROCK, 1 1/2" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18.EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY-VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19.ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE SODDED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20.PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. SYSTEM SHALL INCLUDE A RAIN SENSOR AND APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY. 21.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22.REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. 24.RAIN GARDEN NOTE: PROVIDE AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AT RAIN GARDEN AREA SIDE SLOPES AFTER ALL PLANTING HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. BLANKET TO BE ONE SEASON GEOJUTE, MN/DOT CATEGORY 2 (STRAW 1S, WOOD FIBER 1S), OR APPROVED EQUAL. BLANKET TO BE OVERLAPPED BY 4" AND ANCHORED BY SOD STAPLES. PLACE BLANKET PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE. TRENCH IN EDGES OF BLANKET AREA TO PREVENT UNDER MINING. PROVIDE SILT FENCE AT TOP OF SLOPE AS NEEDED. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO MATCH OTHER PROJECT PLANTING MULCH. PLACE 4" DEPTH OF MULCH AT ALL PLANTING AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AREA (NO FILTER FABRIC). SEE RAIN GARDEN DETAIL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. RAIN GARDEN TO PROVIDE PROPER INFILTRATION AND DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS PER ENGINEERS APPROVAL. 25.MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS UNTIL PROJECT COMPLETION, BUT IN NO CASE, LESS THAN FOLLOWING PERIOD; 1 YEAR AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS BY PRUNING, CULTIVATING, AND WEEDING AS REQUIRED FOR HEALTHY GROWTH. RESTORE PLANTING SAUCERS. TIGHTEN AND REPAIR STAKE AND GUY SUPPORTS AND RESET TREES AND SHRUBS TO PROPER GRADES OR VERTICAL POSITION AS REQUIRED. RESTORE OR REPLACE DAMAGED WRAPPINGS. SPRAY AS REQUIRED TO KEEP TREES AND SHRUBS FREE OF INSECTS AND DISEASE. REPLENISH MULCH TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH. MAINTAIN LAWNS FOR 45 DAYS AFTER INSTALLING SOD INCLUDING MOWING WHEN SOD RECITES 4” IN HEIGHT. WEED PLANTING BEDS AND MULCH SAUCERS AT MINIMUM ONCE A MONTH DURING THE GROWING SEASON. PROVIDE A MONTHLY REPORT TO THE OWNER ON WEEDING AND OTHER MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. 26.SEE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING. 27.OWNER AND ARCHITECT TO CONFIRM SITE FURNISHINGS SUCH AS BENCHES, TABLES AND CHAIRS, AND TRASH/RECYCLING RECEPTACLES. LANDSCAPE NOTES PR E P A R E D F O R LA N D S C A P E D E T A I L S L108 CA T E S M E D I N A I N D U S T R I A L O P P I D A N M E D I N A M N DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L LA N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U N D E R T H E L A W S O F TH E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . RY A N H . H Y L L E S T E D 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 53 8 2 8 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 7 7 4 0 5 4 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 AS S H O W N CF K CF K RA H D D D D D D W I L L O W D R I V E W I L L O W D R I V E C H I P P E W A R O A D CATES RANCH ROADCATES RANCH ROAD C H I P P E W A R O A D C H I P P E W A R O A D L O T 1 B L O C K 1 C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K L O T 2 B L O C K 1 C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K O U T L O T B C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K T T O U T L O T A C A T E S I N D U S T R I A L P A R K 30.0' PROPOSED SCREEN BERM PROPOSED BERM IMPACTED WETLAND 3 PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED SCREEN WALL PROPOSED SCREEN WALL PROPOSED SCREEN WALL IMPACTED WETLAND 1 IMPACTED WETLAND 2 IMPACTED WETLAND 4 PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED ±131,746 SF BUILDING W/ 8 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 PROPOSED ±176,824 SF BUILDING W/ 15 DOCK STALLS FFE = 997.0 LANDSCAPE KEYNOTESLANDSCAPE LEGEND EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.) EDGER (TYP.) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION, SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.) SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.) A A B C D E LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES EDGER (TYP.) DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) ROCK MULCH (TYP.) SOD (TYP.) MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.) SEEDING KEYNOTES SEED WITH MNDOT 22-112: FIVE-YEAR STABILIZATION SEED MIX (TYP.) SEED WITH MNDOT 25-131: LOW MAINTENANCE TURF SEED MIX (TYP.) SEED WITH MNDOT 33-261: STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX (TYP.) 22-112 25-131 33-261 22-112 CONIFEROUS TREE CODE COMMON NAME BHS BLACK HILLS SPRUCE CBS COLORADO SPRUCE ERC EASTERN RED CEDAR WHC WHITE CEDAR WHP WHITE PINE ORNAMENTAL TREE CODE COMMON NAME ALS AUTUMN BRILLANCE SERVICEBERRY IRW IRONWOOD QUA QUAKING ASPEN SSC SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE TCH THORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN OVERSTORY TREE CODE COMMON NAME BOL BOULEVARD LINDEN HCK COMMON HACKBERRY IHL IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST SWO SWAMP WHITE OAK CONIFEROUS SHRUBS CODE COMMON NAME SGJ SEA GREEN JUNIPER TAU TAUTON YEW DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE COMMON NAME AJN AMBER JUBILEE NINEBARK ANH ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA BLC IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY Dbh DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE LDN LITTLE DEVIL NINEBARK RTD RED TWIG DOGWOOD SEM SEM FALSESPIREA PERENNIALS CODE COMMON NAME BES BLACK-EYED SUSAN BHG BLUE HEAVEN LITTLE BLUESTEM KFG KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS PDS PRAIRIE DROPSEED WLC WALKERS LOW CATMINT WSE WHITE SWAN CONEFLOWER PLANT KEY SHEET NUMBER 20 2 2 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 W W W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ O P P I D A N \ C a t e s M e d i n a I n d u s t r i a l \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ L 1 - L A N D S C A P E P L A N . D W G A p r i l 0 7 , 2 0 2 3 - 1 1 : 3 0 a m PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N P R E L I M I N A R Y REQUIRED TREES:100 OVERSTORY DECIDOUS / CONIFEROUS TREES = 4,988 L.F. OF SITE PERIMETER / 50 50 ORNAMENTAL TREES = 4,988 L.F. OF SITE PERIMETER / 100 PROVIDED TREES:139 OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS / CONIFEROUS TREES = 59 DECIDUOUS + 80 CONIFEROUS 71 ORNAMENTAL TREES REQUIRED SHRUBS:167 SHRUBS = 4,988 L.F. OF SITE PERIMETER / 30 PROVIDED SHRUBS:278 SHRUBS LANDSCAPE SUMMARY Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call R NORTH PR E P A R E D F O R O V E R A L L L A N D S C A P E P L A N L100 CA T E S M E D I N A I N D U S T R I A L O P P I D A N M E D I N A M N DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L LA N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U N D E R T H E L A W S O F TH E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . M N LI C . N O . RY A N A . H Y L L E S T E D , P L A 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 53 8 2 8 NOTE: SEE SHEET L108 FOR FULL LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 7 7 4 0 5 4 01 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 3 AS S H O W N CF K CF K RA H LEVEL-1 100' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-A 133' - 0" CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" A B C D E F G H J K T.O. PARAPET-C 135' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-B 134' - 4" M *AVG. DECK HEIGHT: 30'-8" A.F.F. LEVEL-1 100' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-A 133' - 0" CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" LEVEL-DOCK 96' - 0" 123456 T.O. PARAPET-C 135' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-B 134' - 4" SCREEN WALL 60'-0" 14 ' - 6 " *AVG. DECK HEIGHT: 30'-8" A.F.F. LEVEL-1 100' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-A 133' - 0" CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" LEVEL-DOCK 96' - 0" 1 2 3 4 5 6 T.O. PARAPET-C 135' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-B 134' - 4" SCREEN WALL 60'-0" 14 ' - 6 " *AVG. DECK HEIGHT: 30'-8" A.F.F. LEVEL-1 100' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-A 133' - 0" CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" LEVEL-DOCK 96' - 0" ABCDEFGHJK T.O. PARAPET-C 135' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-B 134' - 4" M SCREEN WALL SCREEN WALL *AVG. DECK HEIGHT: 30'-8" A.F.F. EXTERIOR MATERIAL PERCENTAGES MATERIAL PERCENTAGES REQUIRED 1. CLASS 1: 20% MIN. BRICK, NATURAL STONE, STUCCO (NOT EIFS), COPPER, GLASS 2. CLASS 2: 80% MAX. DECORATIVE CONCRETE, SPLIT FACE BLOCK, DECORATIVE PRECAST 3. CLASS 3: 20% MAX. WOOD, METAL, FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, EIFS MATERIAL PERCENTAGES ON BUILDING 1. EAST (DOCK SIDE) 2. WEST A. CLASS 1: 5245/16888 = 31% B. CLASS 2: 11643/16888 = 69% 3. SOUTH A. CLASS 1: 1821/9209 = 20% B. CLASS 2: 7388/9209 = 80% 4. NORTH A. CLASS 1: 1821/9209 = 20% B. CLASS 2: 7388/9209 = 80% MEDINA SPEC INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS MEDINA, MN 03/09/2023 1" = 20'-0"P003 1 PRESENTATION - WEST 1" = 20'-0"P003 2 PRESENTATION - NORTH 1" = 20'-0"P003 3 PRESENTATION - SOUTH 1" = 20'-0"P003 4 PRESENTATION - EAST LIGHT BUFF AGGREGATE DARK AGGREGATE BRAZILWOOD SMOOTH IRONSPOT TITAN SIZE WHITE ACMDARK BUFF AGGREGATE METAL LOUVERED SCREEN WALL MEDIUM BRONZE/ MEDIUM BUFF A B C D E F G 1 2 3 4 5 6 H J K WAREHOUSE BUILDING #1 MECH M 502'-0" 51'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 51'-0" 26 2 ' - 0 " 50 ' - 0 " 5 0 ' - 0 " 5 0 ' - 0 " 5 0 ' - 0 " 62 ' - 0 " DRIVE-INDRIVE-IN SCREEN WALL SCREEN WALL N MEDINA SPEC INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 1 - SHELL PLAN MEDINA, MN 03/09/2023 LEVEL-1 100' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-A 133' - 0" CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" A B C D E F G H J K L M N T.O. PARAPET-C 135' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-B 134' - 4" P Q *AVG. DECK HEIGHT: 30'-8" A.F.F. LEVEL-1 100' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-A 133' - 0" CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" LEVEL-DOCK 96' - 0" 123456 T.O. PARAPET-C 135' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-B 134' - 4" SCREEN WALL 14 ' - 6 " 60'-0" LEVEL-1 100' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-A 133' - 0" CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" LEVEL-DOCK 96' - 0" 1 2 3 4 5 6 T.O. PARAPET-C 135' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-B 134' - 4" SCREEN WALL *AVG. DECK HEIGHT: 30'-8" A.F.F. 60'-0" 14 ' - 6 " LEVEL-1 100' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-A 133' - 0" CLEAR HEIGHT 128' - 0" LEVEL-DOCK 96' - 0" ABCDEFGHJKLMN T.O. PARAPET-C 135' - 0" T.O. PARAPET-B 134' - 4" PQ SCREEN WALL SCREEN WALL *AVG. DECK HEIGHT: 30'-8" A.F.F. EXTERIOR MATERIAL PERCENTAGES MATERIAL PERCENTAGES REQUIRED 1. CLASS 1: 20% MIN. BRICK, NATURAL STONE, STUCCO (NOT EIFS), COPPER, GLASS 2. CLASS 2: 80% MAX. DECORATIVE CONCRETE, SPLIT FACE BLOCK, DECORATIVE PRECAST 3. CLASS 3: 20% MAX. WOOD, METAL, FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING, EIFS MATERIAL PERCENTAGES ON BUILDING 1. WEST (DOCK SIDE) 2. EAST A. CLASS 1: 6469/22605 = 29% B. CLASS 2: 16136/22605 = 71% 3. NORTH A. CLASS 1: 1844/9222 = 20% B. CLASS 2: 7378/9222 = 80% 4. SOUTH A. CLASS 1: 1844/9222 = 20% B. CLASS 2: 7378/9222 = 80% MEDINA SPEC INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 2 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS MEDINA, MN 10-05-2022 1" = 20'-0"P003 1 PRESENTATION - EAST 1" = 20'-0"P003 2 PRESENTATION - SOUTH 1" = 20'-0"P003 3 PRESENTATION - NORTH 1" = 20'-0"P003 4 PRESENTATION - WEST LIGHT BUFF AGGREGATE DARK AGGREGATE BRAZILWOOD SMOOTH IRONSPOT TITAN SIZE WHITE ACMDARK BUFF AGGREGATE METAL LOUVERED SCREEN WALL MEDIUM BRONZE/ MEDIUM BUFF 03/09/2023 *AVG. DECK HEIGHT: 30'-8" A.F.F. A B C D E F G 1 2 3 4 5 6 H J K L M N WAREHOUSE BUILDING #2 MECH P Q 50 ' - 0 " 5 0 ' - 0 " 5 0 ' - 0 " 5 0 ' - 0 " 62 ' - 0 " 26 2 ' - 0 " 37'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 50'-0" 37'-0" 674'-0" DRIVE-INDRIVE-IN SCREEN WALL SCREEN WALL N MEDINA SPEC INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 2 - SHELL PLAN MEDINA, MN 10-05-202203/09/2023 Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 1 of 11 April 18, 2023 Final Plat; PUD Adjustment City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: April 12, 2023 MEETING: April 18, 2023 City Council SUBJECT: Public Hearing–Medina Ventures–Meander Park/Boardwalk–1472 Hwy 55 Final Plat, PUD General Plan Adjustment, Stormsewer Tax District Summary of Request On January 17, 2023, the Medina City Council granted conditional approval of a preliminary plat and rezoning ordinance for the Meander Park and Boardwalk Planned Unit Development and general plan. The applicant has requested final plat approval. During preparation of final plans, a discrepancy of 0.9 feet was found in the location of the subject property’s eastern property line. The surveyor found the eastern property line to be 0.9’ further to the west than shown on preliminary plans. The applicant has requested to construct the improvements in the same location as conditionally approved, despite the fact the eastern property line is one foot closer than assumed. The PUD Ordinance has technically not become effective at this time. One of the provisions of the ordinance was that it would not take effect until after final approval of Meander Park and Boardwalk. Adjustment to PUD The applicant requests to construct the improvements on the site in the locations shown during preliminary review, despite the fact that the eastern property line is one foot closer than originally assumed. although the setback to the eastern property line would be 0.9’ less than previously described. The primary effect of the request is that the shared driveway north of Meander Road is proposed to be 4.1’ from the eastern property line (instead of 5’ as previously assumed) and the parking lot south of Meander Road is proposed 9.1’ from the eastern property line (instead of 10’ as previously assumed). The CH district would generally require a 10-foot setback for parking and the driveway ordinance generally requires a 5-foot setback. Flexibility can be provided to these standards through the PUD process, if the City determined that that PUD meets the objectives of the PUD ordinance. If the Planning Commission and Proposed Uses: Event Venue 14 lodging suites Restaurant Day Care 9,600 s.f. retail 4 townhomes Gross Site Area: 18 acres Net Site Area: 4.9 acre commercial 1.5 acre residential Land Use (north): LDR Current Zoning (north): RR-UR Land Use (south): Commercial Current Zoning (south): CH Proposed Zoning: PUD MEMORANDUM Agenda Item #9H Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 2 of 11 April 18, 2023 Final Plat; PUD Adjustment City Council Meeting Council do not support allowing the reduction of setback, the applicant would need to adjust the plans to shift the parking lot and shared driveway to the west by a foot. The property to the east of the subject site is a 60-foot wide strip of land. North of Meander Road, it contains a driveway which serves two homes to the northeast. Prior to construction of Meander Road in 1998, the driveway had continued through this strip to access Highway 55, but now the strip of land south of Meander Road is vacant. The two homes to the northeast of the site are planned for future redevelopment with sewer and water. Access is anticipated to occur through Fields of Medina West (and/or Foxberry Farms) such that this strip of property would no longer be necessary for a driveway. The strip of property north of Meander Road may provide an opportunity to extend the Diamond Lake Regional Trail from Marsh Pointe to Meander Road rather than going through the Park at the Fields of Medina. South of Meander Road, the land to the east is undeveloped. It may be the case that this 60-foot strip south of Meander Road is sold to be developed with the land to the east, or could offer opportunity for the Diamond Lake Regional Trail to continue to Highway 55. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 3 of 11 April 18, 2023 Final Plat; PUD Adjustment City Council Meeting Purpose of a Planned Unit Development According to Section 827.25, PUD provisions are established to provide comprehensive procedures and standards designed to allow greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas by incorporating design modifications and allowing for a mixture of uses. The PUD process, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Code related to setbacks, lot area, width and depth, yards, and other development standards is intended to encourage: 1. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design, and placement of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. 2. Higher standards of site and building design. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 4 of 11 April 18, 2023 Final Plat; PUD Adjustment City Council Meeting 3. The preservation, enhancement, or restoration of desirable site characteristics such as high quality natural resources, wooded areas, wetlands, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. 4. Innovative approaches to stormwater management and low-impact development practices which result in volume control and improvement to water quality beyond the standard requirements of the City. 5. Maintenance of open space in portions of the development site, preferably linked to surrounding open space areas, and also enhanced buffering from adjacent roadways and lower intensity uses. 6. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly development and use pattern and more convenience in location and design of development and service facilities. 7. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lower development costs and public investments. 8. A development pattern that effectuates the objectives of the Medina Comprehensive Plan. (PUD is not intended as a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles.) 9. A more desirable and creative environment than might be possible through the strict application on zoning and subdivision regulations of the City. Planning Commission Recommendation – PUD Adjustment The PUD approval would remain valid if the Council did not support adjusting the requirements of the PUD to allow for the improvements to be constructed without being shifted to account for the discrepancy. The applicant would need to adjust the location of the improvements by a foot. Staff believes it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission and Council to consider whether they would have supported the PUD in the first place if these factors would have been known (4’ setback from shared driveway on the north and 9’ setback for parking on the south). The City has a high level of discretion when reviewing a PUD because it is a rezoning, which is a legislative action. A PUD should only be approved if it achieves the purposes of the PUD district, the Comprehensive Plan, and other City policies. The PUD process allows flexibility to the general zoning standards to result in a more desirable development than would be expected through strict adherence to the requirements, which in this case are the CH and R1 or R2 requirements. The process provides flexibility which is ultimately at the discretion of the City. Such flexibility often cuts in both directions, certain aspects of the development may not meet the general standards while other exceed minimum standards. The flexibility provides the opportunity for collaboration in site design because the City can request adjustments which may be seen as preferred, but would not be required under general standards. The Planning Commission reviewed at the April 11 meeting and an excerpt from the draft meeting minutes is attached for reference. No one spoke at the hearing, but the City received one comment in response to the public hearing notice, which is attached for reference. The comment raised concerns about the broader development rather than the specific question about the setback from the eastern property line. The Planning Commission had a good deal of discretion on whether the City should require improvements to be adjusted to account for the accurate property line. The Commission voted Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 5 of 11 April 18, 2023 Final Plat; PUD Adjustment City Council Meeting 3-2 in support of adjusting the setbacks in the PUD such that the shared driveway could be 4-feet from the eastern property line and the parking lot could be located 9-feet from the line. Staff believes the final plat could still be reviewed and approved if the Council does not approve of the adjustment to the PUD, along with an extra condition that the plans be adjusted and the property lines for the residential lots north of Meander be adjusted by a foot. The attached ordinance would adjust the PUD approval to allow for the 4-foot setback for the shared residential driveway and the 9-foot setback for the commercial parking lot. If the Council supports allowing these deviations, the ordinance could be adopted. Final Plat Consistency with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, zoning and subdivision regulations, and other relevant policies was reviewed during review of the Preliminary Plat. The standards of the PUD district which will apply to development within the plat were also established at that time. The purpose of a final plat review is to ensure that the final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat and to ensure that all the conditions of approval have been met. Consistency with Preliminary Plat The primary differences on that plat is the adjustment of the eastern property line by 1-foot and the fact that the large wetland area to the west and south of the commercial uses is proposed in an outlot rather than within Lot 1. Easements were added as recommended by the City Engineer and various other technical updates. Otherwise, it appears that the proposed plat layout is substantially similar to the approved preliminary plat. Preliminary Plat Conditions Following is a list of conditions which were required upon preliminary approval. Many conditions would be recommended to be included on a final plat action. Staff has summarized how each has or will be addressed in italics. 1) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include the conditions described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy. The City Attorney has drafted a development agreement, which is attached for review by Council. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant execute the agreement. 2) The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated 10/20/2022 and 09/09/2022 except as may be modified herein. The plans shall be updated to address the comments of the City Engineer and submitted for review in connection with final plat application. The applicant has submitted final plans and the City Engineer has reviewed and commented. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant address the comment. 3) The Applicant shall construct turn lane improvements on Meander Road as recommended by the City Engineer. Plans include construction of the turn lanes. Staff recommends that this condition be included upon final plat approval. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 6 of 11 April 18, 2023 Final Plat; PUD Adjustment City Council Meeting 4) The Applicant shall execute and record instrument(s) in a form and of substance satisfactory to the City Attorney to ensure all lots have access to a public roadway. Staff recommends that this condition be included upon final plat approval. 5) The Applicant shall dedicate a trail easement along the north of Meander Road right-of-way and construct the trail to the crossing at the commercial access. The Applicant shall also pay $64,640 cash-in-lieu of additional parkland dedication. Staff recommends that this condition be included upon final plat approval. 6) The Applicant shall update plans to provide a secondary emergency access, the design of which shall be subject to approval by the Fire Chief and City Engineer. This emergency access shall maintained/plowed to ensure usability. Plans have been updated to provide this secondary emergency access. Staff recommends a condition related to maintenance of the emergency access. 7) The Applicant shall submit emergency vehicle turning exhibits and adjust parking lot layout as necessary to ensure adequate circulation to the satisfaction of City staff. Turning exhibits have been submitted, reviewed, and found to be acceptable. 8) Vehicle-resistant barriers or fencing shall be provided between Meander Road and the play area for the daycare. Staff recommends that this condition be included upon final plat approval. 9) The Applicant shall update plans to provide landscaping adjacent to the retail and restaurant buildings. The applicant has updated plans and identified 5-foot wide landscaping areas along approximately 25% of the restaurant and 35% of the retail building. The applicant proposes to supplement these areas with movable planters on the sidewalk as well. The CH district requires 10-foot wide landscaping for the entire frontage of buildings except at access points. The Council can discuss whether the changes have addressed this condition. 10) The Applicant shall update lighting plans such that light does not exceed 0.5 FC at the property line. The applicant has submitted lighting plans which meet this requirement. 11) The plat shall dedicate drainage and utility easements over all water mains and hydrants, over stormwater improvements and in other locations recommended by the City Engineer. The plat provides drainage and utility easements in locations recommended. 12) The watermain and hydrants within the commercial lots shall be privately maintained. The draft development agreement includes this provision, and staff recommends that it be included with final plat. 13) The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements in order to ensure completion. Staff recommends that this condition be included upon final plat approval. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 7 of 11 April 18, 2023 Final Plat; PUD Adjustment City Council Meeting 14) The Applicant shall execute and record a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney to describe the responsibility of the property owners to maintain the private stormwater improvements. This agreement is attached to the development agreement for review by Council and staff recommends that this condition be included upon final plat approval. 15) The PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat shall be contingent upon approval and implementation of a Wetland Conservation Act Wetland Replacement Plan. The replacement plan is attached for approval by Council and staff recommends that implementation be included as a final plat condition. 16) The Applicant shall establish Upland Buffers in the locations identified on the General Plan of Development. Such buffers shall meet the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance including but not limited to: execution and recordation of Upland Buffer Easement Agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney, planting of appropriate vegetation, and installation of signage. Staff recommends that this condition be included upon final plat approval. 17) The commercial property shall be subject to the City’s lawn and landscaping irrigation regulations. No lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connected to the City water system. The applicant has submitted draft irrigation plans to reuse stormwater. Staff recommends that this condition be included upon final plat approval. 18) The Applicant shall update the architectural design of the restaurant and retail buildings to provide additional architectural elements to break up the roofline and the design shall be subject to approval by City staff prior to issuance of building permits for these structures. Updated architectural plans are attached for review. The applicant has increased the parapet walls extending above portions of the roof to 2’ in additional height rather than 1’. The applicant has stated to staff that the design was intended to be more lower in height and more understated. The Council should review and determine if the updated architectural design meets the condition. Preliminary plat design: Proposed final design: Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 8 of 11 April 18, 2023 Final Plat; PUD Adjustment City Council Meeting 19) The Applicant shall update the architectural design of the twinhomes to provide architectural elements to break up the roofline and the design shall be subject to approval by City staff prior to issuance of building permits for these structures. Updated architectural plans are attached for review. The applicant has included a pitched roof design with a more varied roofline. The Council can review to determine if this meets the intent of the condition. Preliminary Plat design: Proposed final design: 20) The Applicant shall update the architectural design of the event venue building to provide additional window coverage on the northern façade facing Meander Road and on the western façade of the daycare building facing Meander Road. The design shall be subject to approval by City staff prior to issuance of building permits for these structures Updated architectural plans are attached for review. The applicant has included an additional window on each façade. The Council can review to determine if this meets the intent of the condition. 21) The Applicant shall obtain all permits required by Elm Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council and any other relevant agencies. Staff recommends that this condition be included upon final plat approval. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 9 of 11 April 18, 2023 Final Plat; PUD Adjustment City Council Meeting 22) The Applicant shall enter into a petition and waiver with the City in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney related to future assessment for construction of Tamarack Drive. A petition and waiver is attached to the development agreement for review by Council. Staff recommends that execution of this agreement be included as a final plat condition. 23) The Applicant shall provide proof of agreement(s) for off-site parking during peak usage that meets the satisfaction of the City. The applicant has submitted a draft agreement with Loram for off-site parking. Staff has included language within the Development Agreement whereby the operator of the event venue limit attendance as directed by staff if off-site parking is not available. 24) The Applicant shall provide for ongoing active management of the lodging facilities located on the commercial property. Staff has included language within the Development Agreement requiring ongoing active management. Staff recommends that this condition be included upon final plat approval. 25) Building plans shall be subject to review and approval by City staff for general compliance with the general plan of development and Architectural Narrative document created by Villamil Architecture dated 12/22/2022, except as required to be modified herein. Staff recommends that this condition be included upon final plat approval. 26) The Applicant shall provide title evidence prior to or at the time of final plat application and abide by the recommendations of the City Attorney with regard to title matters and recording instructions. The applicant provided title evidence. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant address comments of the city attorney’s plat opinion. 27) The final plat application shall be filed within 180 days from the date of this resolution or the approval hereby granted shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the applicant and approved by the City Council. The final plat was requested by the deadline extended by the City Council. 28) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the preliminary plat, general plan of development, construction plans, and other relevant documents. Staff recommends that this condition be included upon final plat approval. Staff Recommendation – Plat The City has a relatively low level of discretion when considering final plat requests. If the plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat and the conditions of preliminary approval have been addressed (or will be addressed through the development agreement), the plat should be approved. Staff recommends approval of the final plat subject to the conditions noted on the attached resolution. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 10 of 11 April 18, 2023 Final Plat; PUD Adjustment City Council Meeting Wetland Replacement Plan Construction of the required turn-lanes and the trail along Meander Road result in 0.09 acre of wetland impacts. The improvements within the development do not cause any impacts. The Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) recommends approval of the applicant’s proposed replacement plan to purchase 0.18 acre of credit from bank 1722 in Anoka County. No credits are available in Hennepin County. Stormsewer Improvement Tax District The City’s practice is to require property owners to maintain stormwater improvements which serve their property. HOAs take on this responsibility within residential neighborhoods. The City’s practice is also to establish Storm Sewer Improvement Taxing District over residential development sites as a “back-up plan” homeowner’s associations do not maintain stormwater improvements. The City has taken this step in all recent residential subdivisions. The tax district would allow the City to levy a tax against just the property in the development to cover maintenance costs if the HOA failed to do so. To date, the City has not levied taxes against any of the districts established. The City has generally not established districts over commercial properties. The thought behind this distinction is that enforcing the stormwater maintenance agreements would likely be more straightforward with commercial owners. In addition, the City could always create a taxing district in the future, and this would be less confusing against a smaller number of commercial owners. Staff does recommend a taxing district for the four townhomes north of Meander Road. Prior to considering the establishment of such a district, the City Council is required to hold a Public Hearing, which is scheduled for the April 18 meeting. Potential Actions Staff recommends that the City Council first make a determination on the proposed adjustment to the PUD to allow improvements to be constructed as originally proposed despite the eastern property line being one-foot further west than assumed. The Council should hold a hearing on the PUD and on establishment of the Stormsewer Improvement Tax District before considering any action. If the Council wants to require the original setbacks, an additional condition would need to be added to the final plat resolution to require the plans to be updated to shift the improvements. If the Council supports adjusting the PUD approval, the following actions could be taken: 1) Motion to adopt the ordinance establishing a PUD district for “Meander Park and Boardwalk” and amending the official zoning map 2) Motion to adopt the resolution authorizing publication by title and summary 3) Motion to approve the wetland replacement plan for Meander Park and Boardwalk 4) Motion to adopt the resolution granting final plat approval for Meander Park and Boardwalk Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 11 of 11 April 18, 2023 Final Plat; PUD Adjustment City Council Meeting 5) Motion to adopt the Ordinance Establishing the Meander Park and Boardwalk North Stormsewer Improvement Tax District 6) Motion to adopt the resolution authorizing publication by title and summary 7) Motion to approve the Planned Unit Development Agreement If the Council does not support adjusting the PUD approval and supports the plans be adjusted to shift improvements to the west to account for the property line location, the following actions could be taken: 1) Motion to approve the wetland replacement plan for Meander Park and Boardwalk 2) Motion to adopt the resolution granting final plat approval for Meander Park and Boardwalk with the following condition added: “The Applicant shall update construction plans to shift the shared driveway and parking lot to the west to provide setback shown upon the PUD General Plan of Development.” 3) Motion to adopt the Ordinance Establishing the Meander Park and Boardwalk North Stormsewer Improvement Tax District 4) Motion to adopt the resolution authorizing publication by title and summary 5) Motion to approve the Planned Unit Development Agreement Attachments 1. Applicant narrative describing adjustment to PUD 2. Adjusted PUD Ordinance 3. Resolution to Publish by Title and Summary 4. Final Plat resolution 5. Stormsewer Improvement Tax District Ordinance 6. Resolution to Publish by Title and summary 7. PUD Agreement 8. Memo from Roxy Robertson re: wetland replacement plan 9. Wetland Replacement Plan Notice of Decision (draft) 10. Excerpt from 4/11/2023 Planning Commission minutes 11. Comment received 12. Plat 13. Civil Plans 14. Architectural information Memorandum www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer SRF No. 15295.01 To: Dusty Finke – Planning Director City of Medina From: Paul Schroeder – Project Manager Date: April 5, 2023 Subject: East Perimeter Setback PUD Flexibility – Meander Park & Boardwalk East Perimeter Setback PUD Flexibility Request On behalf of the Meander Park & Boardwalk project’s developer, Medina Ventures, LLC, we are asking for Planned Unit Development (PUD) Flexibility for parking and driveway setbacks along the east perimeter of the property, involving both the north and south development parcels. During PUD and Preliminary Plat approval the project’s existing conditions and property lines were based on the SkySurv survey, however during our current Final Plat submittal application, SRF Consulting Group provided Final Plat development and discovered discrepancies in the layout of the property lines to the Title Commitment. In summary, the property lines and plat must match the Title Commitment, and there was about one foot difference on the east perimeter between the previous and current correct property line layout, resulting in a reduction of property to the original PUD layout for both the north and south parcel development. The development layout is limited and after review, it was our discovery that moving the pavement one foot caused undesired reductions in other key areas and felt that a setback reduction was more desirable, thus we are respectfully asking for a setback reduction flexibility as stated below. We have also included Exhibit A, B, and C to graphically show the area in question. North Parcel (Residential) The private common driveway along the east perimeter was originally approved with a typical residential 5-foot setback between the residential pavement edge and the property line. The correct property line has now reduced this distance to a range of 4.07-foot to 4.38-foot, so we are asking for a 4-foot minimum setback in this area and keeping this area as originally designed. Moving this common driveway to accommodate the 5’ setback further reduces the landscape and residential driveways, primarily at Unit 3 and Unit 4. Also, the adjacent property is currently a 60’ wide parcel for an existing gravel driveway for two farmsteads and will most likely be developed as a future driveway, landscape, or trail. Thus, adjacent residential lots would not occur, and the one-foot reduction would hardly be noticed for the existing and future development of this parcel. In addition, specific narrow ornamental grass is being proposed in this area that would accommodate this 4-foot-wide landscape bed. It is our perspective that the setback reduction along the east property is better suited than between the drive and residential units. Dusty Finke – Planning Director April 5, 2023 East Perimeter Setback Flexibility Request – Meander Park & Boardwalk Page 2 North Parcel (Commercial) The parking lot along the east perimeter was originally approved with a typical commercial 10-foot setback between the commercial parking lot face-of-curb and the property line. The correct property line has now reduced this distance to a range of about 9.09-foot, so we are asking for a 9- foot minimum setback in this area and keeping this area as originally designed. Moving this parking row to accommodate the 10’ setback further reduces the interior parking islands and landscaping. Also, the adjacent property is currently a 60’ wide parcel for a previous gravel driveway for two farmsteads but is unused at this time and will most likely be developed as a future trail or a portion of the corridor to be sold to Medina Ventures, LLC. Thus, adjacent commercial development is unlikely to occur at this edge, and the one-foot reduction would hardly be noticed for the existing and future development of this parcel. In addition, specific narrower ornamental trees and sod are being proposed in this area that would accommodate this approximate 9-foot wide landscape bed. It is our perspective that the setback reduction along the east property is better suited than reducing the more noticeable landscape islands. End of Memo H:\Projects\15000\15295.01\_Sent\City Medina\230405_CityMedina- SetbackRequest\Memo_SRF_EastSetback_Meander_2023-04-05.docx DAY CARE 7,500 SF RESTAURANT 4,952 SF PLAY A R E A PL A Y A R E A PLAY AREA EVENT VENUE 15,577 SF PLUS 7,033 SF BASEMENT (STORAGE / DATA CENTER) PLUS 14 LODGING UNITS (2ND/3RD FLOORS) RETAIL 9,510 SF T TT T TR E E * 2 8 TR E E * 2 9 TR E E * 3 3 TR E E * 6 2 TR E E * 6 1 TR E E * 6 0 TR E E * 5 9 TR E E * 5 8 TR E E * 5 7 >> >> S PE D C UN P / W A T E R V A L V E M A R K E R VL T C C F O PE D C E E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)F/O(UG)F/O(UG) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> > > G G G G F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) EX SAN MH RIM: 991.71 (RIM:991.42 PER PLAN) INV(N): 969.82 (PER PLAN) INV(S): 969.72 (PER PLAN) > EX SAN MH RIM: 1000.24 (RIM:1000.07 PER PLAN) INV(N): 971.37 (PER PLAN) INV(S): 971.27 (PER PLAN) EX SAN MH RIM: 1004.83 (RIM:1003.78 PER PLAN) INV(W): 973.28 (PER PLAN) INV(E): 981.38 (PER PLAN) INV(S): 972.98 (PER PLAN) S S S 8" PVC C900 SAN (PER PLAN)8" PVC C900 SAN (PER PLAN) N SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 P. SCHROEDER 15295 N. SCHAUFENBUEL N. SCHAUFENBUEL P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25721 MICHAEL C. AARON 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL SITE PLAN SOUTH C2.1 PLAY STRUCTURES AND FENCE PER DAY CARE PROVIDER 229 TOTAL PARKING SPACES (INCLUDING 8 ADA) TRASH ENCLOSURE TRASH ENCLOSURE TRASH ENCLOSURE TRASH ENCLOSURE LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE (BY OWNER) LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE (BY OWNER) ELEVATED BOARDWALK WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15') WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER DELINEATED WETLAND LINE ELEVATED BOARDWALK WETLAND 12'15.5'15.5' 15.5'15.5' EX. 12' EX. 12' LE F T T U R N L A N E LIMITS OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS LIMITS OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS EX. 15.5'EX. 12' EX. 15.5' EX. 15.5'EX. 15.5' EX. STREET RURAL SECTION WITH SHOULDER EX. STREET URBAN SECTION WITH CURB & GUTTER STRIPED MEDIAN STRIPED MEDIAN COMMERCIAL BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP AND CROSSWALK 10 ' B I T U M I N O U S T R A I L W / 5 ' B O U L E V A R D 6' CONCRETE SIDEWALK 8' CONCRETE SIDEWALKBASEMENT LIMITS BASEMENT SERVICE DOORS BASEMENT 10' CONCRETE SERVICE ROUTE (UNDER BOARDWALK) 12 ' 12 ' 12 ' 30 . 0 ' 8.0 ' 9.0 ' 24 . 0 ' 19 . 0 ' 19.0' 19.0' 24.0' 19.0' 19.0' 24.0' 19.0' 19.0' 24.0' 19.0' 19.0' 24.0' 19.0' 19.0' 24.0' 12' 16' 9' MI N . 21 . 9 ' 30 . 0 ' 12.2' 49.6' 59.3' 49.6' 59.2' 57.2' 10.7' 10.0' 49.2' 88.8' 80.2' 84 . 5 ' 60 . 1 ' 60 . 0 ' 60 . 4 ' 73 . 4 ' 77 . 4 ' 61 . 4 ' 35 . 7 ' DELINEATED WETLAND LINE DELINEATED WETLAND LINE WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER SETBACK PUD FLEXIBILITY AT LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE, MIN. 2' (TYP.) NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL 1 10-20-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE 2 11-04-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS FUTURE FREESTANDING DEVELOPMENT SIGN AREA 12 . 0 ' FIRE LA N E W I T H SURMO U N T A B L E C U R B PLAY AREA FENCE ALONG MEANDER ROAD TO BE VEHICLE-RESISTANT ARCHITECTURAL PATIO WALL SIGNAGE AND STRIPING KEY NOTES A.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - STOP SIGN (30"X30", R1-1) B.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - NO PARKING FIRE LANE (12"X18", R7) C.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - ADA PARKING SIGN (12"X18", R7-8M) WITH VAN ACCESSIBLE (6"X12", R7-8bP) D.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - DUAL TURN LANE ONLY OPPOSITE (36"X30", R3-8aa) E.ENVIRO SIGNAGE - WETLAND BUFFER (TBD) F.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - 4" WIDE SOLID - WHITE PAINT G.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - 4" WIDE SOLID - YELLOW PAINT H.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - DOUBLE 4" WIDE SOLID WITH 4" GAP - YELLOW PAINT I.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - DOUBLE 4" WIDE SOLID OUTSIDE, DASHED INSIDE (10' W/ 40' GAP) WITH 4" GAP - YELLOW PAINT J.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - ADA SYMBOL AND NO PARKING ACCESS AISLE - WHITE PAINT K.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - LEFT TURN ARROW (PMA-2L) - WHITE PAINT L.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - RIGHT TURN ARROW (PMA-2R) - WHITE PAINT M.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - PEDESTRIAN CROSSING (3'X8' WITH 3' GAP) - WHITE PAINT N.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - 4" WIDE SOLID (45 DEGREE ANGLE WITH 4' GAP), YELLOW PAINT O.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGN WITH DIRECTIONAL ARROW SIGN (30"X30", W11-2, AND W16-7P)STORM BASIN 13 6 . 2 ' WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15') SITE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT SETBACK LINE (PER CODE) EXISTING CONDITIONS TRUNCATED DOMES EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY RESTORATION CURB AND GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER (TIP-OUT) ORNAMENTAL FENCE PARKING LOT POLE LIGHT RETAINING WALL PARKING SPACES PER ROW WETLAND DELINEATION LINE WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER & WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FENCE TO BE 2' CLEAR OF FIRE LANE PAVEMENT M E A N D E R R D HW Y 5 5 CAVANAUGH DRIVE EXISTING GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE D R I V E RES UNIT 1 RES UNIT 3 DAY CARE 7,500 SF RES UNIT 2 RES UNIT 4 PLAY A R E A PL A Y A R E A PLAY AREA T TR E E * 7 8 VL T C C F O PE D C E EO H - E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH) E(O H ) F/O(UG)F/O(UG) >> >> >> S S · · · N SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 P. SCHROEDER 15295 N. SCHAUFENBUEL N. SCHAUFENBUEL P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25721 MICHAEL C. AARON 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL SITE PLAN NORTH C2.2 WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15') WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER DELINEATED WETLAND LINE 10 TOTAL PARKING SPACES (INCLUDING 2 PER GARAGE AND 2 VISITOR) UPPER LEVEL DECK, LOWER LEVEL WALKOUT (TYP.) WETLAND WETLAND 2 CAR GARAGE PER UNIT (TYP.) VISITOR PARKING (9'X18' STALL) FIRE TRUCK HAMMERHEAD TURN-AROUND, PER MN STATE FIRE CODE FIGURE D103.1 INVOLVING "ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO 120' HAMMERHEAD" DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.), SEE UTILITY PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT 10 ' B I T U M I N O U S T R A I L W / 5 ' B O U L E V A R D SHARED RESIDENTIAL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY WITH RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE DRIVE, EX. GRAVEL RESIDENT DRIVEWAY, AND TRAIL EXISTING 12'± GRAVEL RESIDENT DRIVEWAY 4.5 ' 20 . 0 ' 4' M I N . 50.0' 60.0' 70 . 0 ' 20.0' R28' R28' 43.7' 45 . 0 ' 12.7' 17.5' 17.5' 3.0' 45 . 4 ' WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER SETBACK PUD FLEXIBILITY AT DEVELOPMENT, MIN. 25' AT GENERAL AREAS AND 17' AT RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH SPLIT RAIL FENCE AT BACKYARD PERIMETER (TYP.) WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER SPLIT RAIL FENCE AT RESIDENTIAL DOCK AREA NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL 1 10-20-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE 2 11-04-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS RETAINING WALLS WITH SPLIT RAIL FENCE CAVANAUGH DRIVE TYP. SECTION A.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - STOP SIGN (30"X30", R1-1) B.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - NO PARKING FIRE LANE (12"X18", R7) C.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - ADA PARKING SIGN (12"X18", R7-8M) WITH VAN ACCESSIBLE (6"X12", R7-8bP) D.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - DUAL TURN LANE ONLY OPPOSITE (36"X30", R3-8aa) E.ENVIRO SIGNAGE - WETLAND BUFFER (TBD) F.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - 4" WIDE SOLID - WHITE PAINT G.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - 4" WIDE SOLID - YELLOW PAINT H.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - DOUBLE 4" WIDE SOLID WITH 4" GAP - YELLOW PAINT I.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - DOUBLE 4" WIDE SOLID OUTSIDE, DASHED INSIDE (10' W/ 40' GAP) WITH 4" GAP - YELLOW PAINT J.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - ADA SYMBOL AND NO PARKING ACCESS AISLE - WHITE PAINT K.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - LEFT TURN ARROW (PMA-2L) - WHITE PAINT L.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - RIGHT TURN ARROW (PMA-2R) - WHITE PAINT M.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - PEDESTRIAN CROSSING (3'X8' WITH 3' GAP) - WHITE PAINT N.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - 4" WIDE SOLID (45 DEGREE ANGLE WITH 4' GAP), YELLOW PAINT O.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGN WITH DIRECTIONAL ARROW SIGN (30"X30", W11-2, AND W16-7P) SIGNAGE AND STRIPING KEY NOTES STORM BASIN 13 . 4 ' 13 . 9 ' RESIDENTIAL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRONS TO MEET CITY STANDARD PLATE STR-12 SITE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT SETBACK LINE (PER CODE) EXISTING CONDITIONS TRUNCATED DOMES EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY RESTORATION CURB AND GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER (TIP-OUT) SPLIT RAIL FENCE PARKING LOT POLE LIGHT RETAINING WALL PARKING SPACES PER ROW WETLAND DELINEATION LINE WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER & WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE M E A N D E R R D EXISTING GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE RES UNIT 1 RES UNIT 3 RES UNIT 2 RES UNIT 4 T G E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH) F/O(UG) F/O(UG) F/O(UG)F/O(UG) | | | | | | | | | G G G G G G G (3) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS (113) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS (9) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS (16) PRAIRIE DROPSEED (16) PRAIRIE DROPSEED (18) PRAIRIE DROPSEED (16) PRAIRIE DROPSEED (15) ALPINE CURRANT (15) ALPINE CURRANT (15) ALPINE CURRANT (16) ALPINE CURRANT PRIVATE DRIVE ANT TTPE D C E(OH) E(OH) E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) PIV FDC FDC (20) MAY NIGHT SAGE (48) GOLDSTRUM BLACK-EYED SUSAN (25) MAY NIGHT SAGE (3) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY (6) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS (41) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY (11) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY (12) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS (9) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY (19) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY (20) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS (23) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY (26) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY (12) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS (14) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY (19) PRAIRIE DROPSEED (23) ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA (20) GOLDSTRUM BLACK-EYED SUSAN (21) MAY NIGHT SAGE (7) KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS (13) ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA (6) ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA (21) STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY OERSTER EED GRASS (2) HOLMSTRUP ARBORVITAE (7) ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA (4) MINT JULEP JUNIPER (10) ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA (22) MAY NIGHT SAGE N LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PLAN L1.4 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 15295 J. FILLMORE J. FILLMORE P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25820 PAUL D. SCHROEDER 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL SOUTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PLAN 21 L1.4 NORTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PLAN1 L1.4 N METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER METAL LANDSCAPE EDGER APPROXIMATELY 4' FROM EDGE OF PRIVATE DRIVE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNDER DECKS (4" DEPTH, TYP) SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNDER DECKS (4" DEPTH, TYP) SPLIT RAIL FENCE. SOD EDGE 1' OFF FENCE. DAY CARE RESTAURANT Ordinance No. ### 1 DATE CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. ### AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR “MEANDER PARK AND BOARDWALK” AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP THE CITY COUNCIL OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Medina previously adopted Ordinance 700, establishing a Planned Unit Development District for Meander Park and Boardwalk and changing the zoning classification of the property legally described in Exhibit A (the “Property”) to Planned Unit Development. Ordinance 700 has not yet taken effect and the City subsequently received a request to approve an amended version of the Planned Unit Development. Based on the written and oral record before the Planning Commission and City Council during review of Ordinance 700, during review of the request to amend said previous approval, as well as all additional testimony submitted to the City, the City Council has found that the proposed rezoning of the Property to Planned Unit Development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and serves the purpose of the Planned Unit Development district. Section 2. The Property is hereby rezoned to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The location of the zoning amendment is depicted on the map in Exhibit B, attached hereto. Section 3. The Meander Park and Boardwalk Planned Unit Development General Plan is hereby approved. A. All entitlements, including but not limited to, allowed uses, density, dimensional standards, setbacks and development standards established within this PUD District are hereby set forth by the Meander Park and Boardwalk General Plan dated 04/04/2023 (the “General Plan”) which are incorporated herein by reference, except as may be expressly modified by this ordinance or Resolution 2023-07. B. Unless specifically addressed by this ordinance, the Property shall be subject to the requirements set forth by the City of Medina Zoning Ordinance, including the Two- Family Residential (“R2”) zoning district north of Meander Road, the Commercial- Highway (“CH”) zoning district south of Meander Road, as well as other relevant standards which are not district-specific. C. The lots within the Property south of Meander Road shall be classified as “Commercial Lots” and the lots within the Property north of Meander Road shall be classified as “Twinhome Lots” as described in Exhibit B. The Commercial Lots and Twinhome Lots shall be subject to the relevant standards described herein. Ordinance No. ### 2 DATE Section 4. Allowed Uses. The allowed uses within the PUD District shall be as follows: A. Commercial Lots. i. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses shall be those described in the General Plan. Other permitted uses described in the CH zoning district shall be allowed upon the Commercial Lots, subject to administrative review by City staff for compliance with relevant standards, including but not limited to parking requirements. ii. Conditional Uses. The following shall be permitted within the Commercial Lots, subject to separate conditional use permit approval, the specific requirements established in Section 838.5.08, and other applicant provisions of the city code: a. Indoor Recreational Uses, including but not limited to bowling alleys, dance halls, movie theaters, and live entertainment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Event Venue and Conservatory as described within the General Plan shall be considered permitted uses and shall not require separate conditional use permit approval b. Retail and service uses which include the keeping of animals on-site. iii. Accessory Uses. Allowed accessory uses shall be those described in the CH district, except Outdoor Storage shall not be permitted. B. Twinhome Lots. The permitted, conditional, and accessory uses shall be those described in the R2 zoning district, except that Accessory Dwelling Units shall not be permitted. Dwellings, or any portion thereof, shall not be used for short-term rentals. For the purpose of this ordinance, the term short-term rental means the rental of a dwelling or portion thereof for less than 30 consecutive days. Section 5. Lot Standards. A. The layout of the Commercial Lots and the structures and improvements thereon shall be substantially consistent with the General Plan. Minor deviations may be approved by City staff provided the square footage of the structures does not exceed that shown on the General Plan and the setbacks of the structures and parking lot do not decrease from that shown. B. The Twinhome Lots shall be subject to the requirements of the R2 zoning district except as explicitly described below. i. Minimum lot size: 4,500 square feet ii. Minimum front yard setback: 5 feet from front lot line iii. Minimum side yard setback: 6 feet, except the side yard setback shall be reduced to zero for the common wall between two dwelling units. iv. Maximum impervious surface coverage: 62% v. The shared driveway shall be setback a minimum of 4-feet from the eastern property line of Oulot B. Section 6. Design and Development Standards. All standards not specified by this ordinance are to be the same as found in the Medina Zoning Ordinance for the relevant underlying zoning districts specified herein. The following deviations from the underlying Ordinance No. ### 3 DATE performance standards are hereby in effect for the Meander Park and Boardwalk Planned Unit Development: A. Building Materials and Design shall be consistent with the standards approved by the City Council at the time of final plat review, which shall be subject to review for consistency with enhancements required in Resolution 2023-07. B. Landscaping and tree replacement shall be consistent with the landscaping plan approved by the City Council at the time of final plat review, which shall be subject to review for consistency with enhancements required in Resolution 2023- 07. C. The location of Upland Buffers shall be as depicted on the General Plan. Fencing shall be provided along the edge of the Upland Buffer adjacent to the Twinhome Lots. Vegetation and signage shall meet relevant ordinance standards. D. Signage shall abide by the requirements of the City Sign Ordinance except as expressly described below. Signage on the Commercial Lots shall meet the requirements described for the Commercial-Highway district except as follows: i. A maximum of one freestanding sign shall be permitted adjacent to the Highway 55 frontage on the Property. This sign shall be subject to the requirements for freestanding signs in the CH district. ii. One monument sign shall be permitted adjacent to the shared access of the Commercial Lots adjacent to Meander Road. No pylon sign shall be permitted along the frontage of Meander Road. The monument sight shall meet the requirements for monument signs in the CH district. iii. Any wall sign on the north or east elevation of the building on Lot 2, Block 2 shall not be internally illuminated. iv. No wall sign shall be permitted above the first story of the north elevation of the building on Lot 1, Block 2. v. No wall sign shall be permitted above the second story of the east elevation of the building on Lot 1, Block 2. vi. Projecting signs shall be permitted, provided adequate clearance is provided and that the area of such signs is included within the allowed area of wall signage for the building in question. E. The owner(s) of the Commercial Lots shall implement active parking management practices consistent with a plan approved by the City Council at the time of final plat review. Off-site parking and shuttling shall be implemented as necessary for larger events within the Event Venue and Conservatory. If the City determines, in its sole discretion, that such active parking management is inadequate, the owner(s) shall implement additional practices to the satisfaction of City staff or limit attendance at events as necessary based on parking supply. Such determination by the City will be communicated to the owner(s) in writing, and Ordinance No. ### 4 DATE thereafter the owner(s) will be provided 60 days to adequately address the inadequacies to the City’s satisfaction. Section 7. The City of Medina Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to place this ordinance into effect and to make the appropriate changes to the official zoning map of the City of Medina to reflect the change in zoning classifications as set forth above only upon recording of the Meander Park and Boardwalk plat. Section 8. Ordinance 700, adopted January 18, 2023 is hereby rescinded, having never become effective. Section 9. A copy of this ordinance and the updated map shall be kept on file at the Medina City Hall. Section 10. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, publication, and recording of the Meander Park and Boardwalk plat. Adopted by the Medina City Council this _____ day of ________, 2023. CITY OF MEDINA By: Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: By: Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk Published in the Crow River News on this day the _____ of ______, 2023. Ordinance No. ### 5 DATE EXHIBIT A Ordinance No. ### 6 DATE EXHIBIT B Map Depicting “Commercial” and “Twinhome” Lots Commercial Lots Twinhome Lots Resolution No. 2023-## DATE Member _______ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-## RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. ### BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance establishing a planned unit development district for “Meander Park and Boardwalk” and amending the official zoning map; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publications by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS, the ordinance is six pages in length and contains a map; and WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. ### to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety: Public Notice The city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance establishing a planned unit development district for “Meander Park and Boardwalk.” The ordinance rezones property located at 1472 Highway 55, which is proposed to be subdivided and developed as to planned unit development. The development includes four residential lots north of Meander Road and four commercial lots south of Meander Road. The ordinance establishes regulations related land use of the property and standards for the design and construction of the development. The Ordinance rescinds and takes the place of Ordinance No. 700, which was previously adopted by the City but has not yet taken effect. The full text of the ordinance is available from the city clerk at Medina city hall during regular business hours. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post a full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city. Resolution No. 2023-## 2 DATE Dated: ______________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ______ upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2023-## DATE Member ________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-## RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR MEANDER PARK AND BOARDWALK WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Medina Ventures, LLC (the “Applicant”) intends to purchase and develop certain property at 1472 State Highway 55 (the “Property”), located north of Highway 55 and east of Arrowhead Drive, which is legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto; and WHEREAS, on January 17, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution 2023-07 granting preliminary plat and planned unit development general plan of development approval to subdivide and develop the Property into four commercial lots, four twinhome lots, and outlots to contain common improvements and space; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has now requested final approval of the plat, proposed to be called Meander Park and Boardwalk; and WHEREAS, on April 18, 2023, the City Council reviewed the plat, reviewed the information provided by the Applicant and City staff, and heard testimony from interested parties; and WHEREAS, the City has, as part of its comprehensive plan, conducted a study of the need for new parks and recreational facilities created by new development, and that study deemed that projects of this type create additional demand for such facilities; and WHEREAS, this project will generate more intensive uses and traffic in the area, including both a residential impact north of Meander Road and commercial impact south of Meander Road with large groups and overnight lodging facilities, and so the abovementioned study and the City’s park dedication requirements established in light thereof and required below provide a roughly proportionate estimate of the additional need for parks and recreational facilities generated by the proposed project; and WHEREAS, subject to the fulfillment of the conditions noted below, the City Council makes the following findings of fact regarding plat based on the requirements of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance: a. The proposed plat is generally consistent with the approved preliminary plat. b. The conditions noted in Resolution 2023-07 have been addressed or are included as conditions of this approval because provisions have been made to address the conditions within the Planned Unit Development Agreement. Resolution No. 2023-## 2 DATE c. The City Council finds that approval is appropriate based upon the criteria described in Subd. 10 of Section 820.21 of the subdivision ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota hereby grants final plat approval for Meander Park and Boardwalk, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include the conditions described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy. 2) The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated 04/04/2024 except as may be modified herein. The plans shall be updated to address the comments of the City Engineer dated 4/12/2023. 3) The Applicant shall construct turn lane improvements on Meander Road as recommended by the City Engineer. 4) The Applicant shall execute and record instrument(s) in a form and of substance satisfactory to the City Attorney to ensure all lots have access to a public roadway. 5) To satisfy park dedication, the Applicant shall dedicate a trail easement along the north of Meander Road right-of-way and construct the trail to the crossing at the commercial access. The Applicant shall also pay $64,640 cash-in-lieu of additional parkland dedication. 6) The Applicant shall ensure that the secondary emergency access is maintained/plowed to ensure usability. 7) Vehicle-resistant barriers or fencing shall be provided between Meander Road and the play area for the daycare. 8) The watermain and hydrants within the commercial lots shall be privately maintained. 9) The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements in order to ensure completion. 10) The Applicant shall execute and record a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney to describe the responsibility of the property owners to maintain the private stormwater improvements. 11) The Applicant shall implement the Wetland Conservation Act Wetland Replacement Plan. 12) The Applicant shall establish Upland Buffers in the locations identified on the General Plan of Development. Such buffers shall meet the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance including but not limited to: execution and recordation of Upland Buffer Easement Agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney, planting of appropriate vegetation, and installation of signage. 13) The commercial property shall be subject to the City’s lawn and landscaping irrigation regulations. No lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connected to the City water system. 14) The Applicant shall obtain all permits required by Elm Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council and any other relevant agencies. 15) The Applicant shall enter into a petition and waiver with the City in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney related to future assessment for construction of Tamarack Drive. Resolution No. 2023-## 3 DATE 16) The Applicant shall provide proof of agreement(s) for off-site parking during peak usage that meets the satisfaction of the City. 17) The Applicant shall provide for ongoing active management of the lodging facilities located on the commercial property. 18) Building plans shall be subject to review and approval by City staff for general compliance with the general plan of development and Architectural Narrative document created by Villamil Architecture dated 04/04/2023, except as required to be modified herein. 19) The Applicant shall address the comments of the City Attorney’s plat opinion and abide by the recommendations of the City Attorney with regard to title matters and recording instructions. 20) The plat shall be recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder and Registrar of Titles within 180 days of the date of the resolution or the approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the Applicant and approved by the City Council. 21) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the plat, general plan of development, construction plans, and other relevant documents. Dated: By: ______________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: By: ___________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _______ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2023-## 4 DATE EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property Ordinance No. ### 1 DATE CITY OF MEDINA ORDINANCE NO. ### AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE MEANDER PARK AND BOARDWALK NORTH STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT TAX DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Background: Findings. 1.01. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 444.16 – 444.21 (the “Act”) to establish a storm sewer improvement tax district within Block 1 of the Meander Park and Boardwalk (the “District”) to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise improve storm sewer systems and related facilities within the District and to acquire, construct, maintain and improve stormwater holding areas and ponds outside of the District which are for the benefit of the District in accordance with the Act and to levy a tax on all taxable property within the District to finance such activities. 1.02. It is found and determined that it is in the best interests of Medina and its storm water management program that the District be established. The District shall be comprised of the land legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto. Section II. Establishment: Authorizations. 2.01. The Meander Park and Boardwalk North Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District is hereby established. The City shall have all powers and authority conferred by the Act in the operation and financing of the activities of the District. 2.02. The boundaries of the District include all property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and are depicted in the map on Exhibit B, attached hereto. 2.03. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the Auditor and Recorder of Hennepin County. Section III. This ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and publication and the recording of the plat of Meander Park and Boardwalk in Hennepin County. Ordinance No. ### 2 DATE Adopted by the City Council of the City of Medina this ____ day of ______, 2023 Kathleen Martin, Mayor Attest: _____________________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk Published in the Crow River News on this ____ day of _______, 2023. Ordinance No. ### DATE 3 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of property contained within boundaries of Meander Park and Boardwalk North Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District Lots 1 through 4, Block 1, and Outlot A, Meander Park and Boardwalk, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Ordinance No. ### DATE 4 EXHIBIT B Map of Meander Park and Boardwalk North Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District Location of Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District Resolution No. 2023-## DATE Member _____ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 2023-## RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. ### BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance establishing the Meander Park and Boardwalk North Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publications by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS, the ordinance is four pages in length and contains a map; and WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. ### to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety: Public Notice The city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an ordinance establishing the Meander Park and Boardwalk North Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District. The tax district applies to property legally described as Lots 1-4, Block 1 and Outlot A, Meander Park and Boardwalk, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The tax district would allow the City to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise improve storm sewer systems and related facilities related to the District and to levy a tax on all taxable property within the District to finance such activities. The full text of the ordinance is available from the city clerk at Medina city hall during regular business hours. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post a full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city. Resolution No. 2023-## 2 DATE Dated: ______________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _____________ upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: And the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. ME230-800-859539.v4 DRAFT April 13, 2023 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF MEDINA AND MEDINA VENTURES, LLC FOR MEANDER PARK AND BOARDWALK This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 ME230-800-859539.v4 i TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. Zoning; Number of Units; Adherence to General Plan ................................................................. 1 2. Right to Proceed ............................................................................................................................ 2 3. Plans; Improvements ..................................................................................................................... 3 4. Erosion Control ............................................................................................................................. 3 5. Site Grading; Haul Route .............................................................................................................. 4 6. Construction of Subdivision Improvements ................................................................................. 4 7. Shared Driveway ........................................................................................................................... 5 8. Meander Road Improvements and Access to Commercial Lots ................................................... 6 9. Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements ..................................................................................... 6 10. Stormwater Improvements ............................................................................................................ 6 11. Landscaping Plan; Landscape Irrigation Plan; Tree Removal ...................................................... 8 12. Lighting ......................................................................................................................................... 8 13. Trails and Boardwalk .................................................................................................................... 8 14. Additional Parking; Management of Lodging .............................................................................. 9 15. Letter of Credit .............................................................................................................................. 9 16. Homeowners’ Association .......................................................................................................... 10 17. Wetlands; Upland Buffer Easement Agreement ......................................................................... 10 18. City Trunk Connection Rates; SAC Fees ................................................................................... 11 19. City Trunk Connection Rates; SAC Fees ................................................................................... 11 20. Park Dedication Requirements ................................................................................................... 11 21. Responsibility for Costs; Escrow for Construction Inspection ................................................... 11 22. Developer’s Default .................................................................................................................... 12 23. Insurance ..................................................................................................................................... 12 24. No Building Permits Approved; Certificates of Occupancy ....................................................... 13 25. Clean up and Dust Control .......................................................................................................... 13 26. Compliance with Laws ............................................................................................................... 13 27. Agreement Runs with the Land .................................................................................................. 13 28. Indemnification ........................................................................................................................... 14 29. Assignment ................................................................................................................................. 14 30. Notices ........................................................................................................................................ 14 31. Severability ................................................................................................................................. 14 32. Non-waiver ................................................................................................................................. 15 33. Estoppel Certificate; Partial Release ........................................................................................... 15 34. Counterparts ................................................................................................................................ 16 SIGNATURES .......................................................................................................................................... 16-17 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY EXHIBIT B LIST OF PLAN DOCUMENTS EXHIBIT C FORM OF STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT EXHIBIT D FORM OF TRAIL EASEMENT EXHIBIT E SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE EXHIBIT F FORM OF UPLAND BUFFER AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT EXHIBIT G FORM OF PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT ME230-800-859539.v4 1 This Planned Unit Development Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into this ____ day of ______________, 2023, by and between the city of Medina, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota (the “City”), and Medina Ventures, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer is fee owner of the property located at 1472 Trunk Highway 55 which is located north and south of Meander Road and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the City has adopted Ordinance 700 rezoning the Property to Planned Unit Development and Resolution ______ granting final approval of the plat of Meander Park and Boardwalk (the “Subdivision); and WHEREAS, the Developer intends to develop the Property with four twin homes north of Meander Road and commercial uses south of Meander Road; and WHEREAS, the aforementioned ordinances and resolutions related to the rezoning, the General Plan for Development, and the final plat of the Subdivision shall be collectively referred to herein as the “City Approvals”; and WHEREAS, the City Approvals are contingent upon the Developer entering into a planned unit development agreement satisfactory to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, based on the mutual covenants and obligations contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Zoning; Number of Units; Adherence to General Plan. a) Subject to execution of this Agreement and all other conditions contained in the City Approvals, the Property has been zoned Planned Unit Development and may be developed with no more than four twin homes to the north of Meander Road and commercial development on four lots to the south of Meander Road. This represents an increase in the density allowed and flexibility from other requirements under the previous zoning designations of the Property and was approved because the City, based on the plans submitted by the Developer, determined that the development, with its proposed features, met the intent and purposes of its planned unit development ordinance. Approval of the development described herein is strictly conditioned upon the Developer’s compliance with all terms and conditions of the City Approvals and this Agreement. b) Adherence to the City Approvals involves restrictions on the Developer’s ability to use and develop the Property. The Developer has carefully reviewed the City’s planned unit development ordinance and the terms and conditions of the City Approvals and understands the limitations on the use and development of the Property that such regulations and approvals impose. The Developer has knowingly and willingly agreed to be bound by such regulations and approvals because it has concluded it is in its best interests to see the Property developed pursuant to such regulations and approvals. ME230-800-859539.v4 2 2. Right to Proceed. The Developer may not construct public or private improvements or any buildings within the Subdivision until all of the following conditions precedent have been satisfied: a) the final plat of Meander Park and Boardwalk has been approved by the City; b) this Agreement has been executed by the Developer and the City and recorded with Hennepin County land records; c) the required Letter of Credit (as hereinafter defined) has been received by the City from or on behalf of the Developer; d) final engineering and construction plans in digital form regarding the Subdivision Improvements (as hereinafter defined) have been submitted by the Developer and approved by the City engineer; e) the Developer has reimbursed the City for all legal, engineering and administrative expenses reasonably incurred to date by the City regarding the Subdivision and has deposited with the City the additional inspection escrow required by this Agreement; f) the Developer has executed an instrument providing perpetual access over the shared driveway for the residential lots in a form approved by the city attorney; g) the Developer has executed an instrument providing perpetual access over Lot 1, Block 2 for the commercial lots in a form approved by the city attorney; h) the Developer has executed two Stormwater Maintenance Agreements substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C; i) the Developer has executed a trail easement substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D; j) the Developer has executed two Upland Buffer Easement Agreements substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F; k) the Developer has executed the Petition and Waiver Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit G; l) the Developer has submitted and the City has approved the certified grading plan; m) all erosion control measures are in place; n) the Developer has received all required permits from the Elm Creek Watershed District, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Metropolitan Council and any other entity having jurisdiction over the Subdivision; o) the Developer or the Developer’s engineer has initiated and attended a pre-construction meeting with the City engineer and staff; and p) the City has issued a notice that all conditions precedent have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed to construct the improvements contemplated by this Agreement. ME230-800-859539.v4 3 Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Developer may request written approval from the City to allow the commencement of grading activities prior to the satisfaction of one or more of the conditions above, provided, however, that any decision regarding whether to grant such written approval shall be left entirely to the discretion of City staff and consultants. If approved, the Developer assumes any and all risk associated with performing such grading work prior to the satisfaction of any uncompleted conditions. 3. Plans; Improvements. a) The Developer agrees to develop the Subdivision in accordance with the final plat of Meander Park and Boardwalk and the terms and conditions of the City Approvals, which are hereby fully incorporated by reference into this Agreement and made a part hereof, and to construct all required improvements in accordance with the approved engineering and construction plans (collectively, the “Plans”) and this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the City Approvals and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control. The documents which constitute the Plans are those on file with and approved by the City and are listed on Exhibit B attached hereto. The Plans may not be modified by the Developer without the prior written approval of the City or except as expressly provided in this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City staff may approve minor changes to the Plans. b) In developing the Subdivision in accordance with the Plans, the Developer shall make or install at its sole expense the following public and private improvements (collectively, the “Subdivision Improvements”): 1. site grading; 2. shared driveway; 3. improvements to Meander Road; 4. trails; 5. sanitary sewer; 6. municipal water distribution system; 7. stormwater facilities; 8. landscaping; 9. landscape irrigation system; 10. upland buffers; and 11. lighting. c) All work performed by or on behalf of the Developer on or related to the Subdivision, including construction of the Subdivision Improvements and construction of any building within the Subdivision, shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m. on Saturday. 4. Erosion Control. a) All construction regarding the Subdivision Improvements shall be conducted in a manner designed to control erosion and in compliance with all City ordinances and other requirements, including the City’s permit with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding municipal separate storm sewer system program. Before any portion of the Property is rough graded, an erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer as approved by the City. The City may impose additional reasonable erosion control requirements after the City’s initial approval if the City deems such necessary due to a change in conditions. All areas disturbed ME230-800-859539.v4 4 by the excavation shall be reseeded promptly after the completion of the work in that area unless construction of streets, utilities, parking areas, buildings, stormwater facilities or other improvements is anticipated soon thereafter. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. b) If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems reasonably appropriate to control erosion based on the urgency of the situation. The City agrees to provide reasonable notice to the Developer in advance of any proposed action, including notice by telephone or email in the case of emergencies, but limited notice by the City when conditions so dictate will not affect the Developer’s obligations or the City’s rights hereunder. c) The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all expenses it reasonably incurs in connection with any action it takes to control erosion. No grading or construction of the Subdivision Improvements will be allowed and no building permits will be issued within the Subdivision unless the Developer is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements. The erosion control measures specified in the Plans or otherwise required within the Subdivision shall be binding on the Developer and its successors and assigns. 5. Site Grading; Haul Route. a) In order to construct the Subdivision Improvements and otherwise prepare the Property for development, it will be necessary for the Developer to grade the Property. All site grading must be done in compliance with the Plans and the requirements of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding contaminated soils. The City may withhold issuance of building permits for structures within the Subdivision until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City. Within 30 days after completion of the grading, the Developer shall provide the City with an “as constructed” grading plan and a certification by a registered land surveyor or engineer. b) The Developer agrees that any fill or other material which must be brought to or removed from the Property while grading or during construction of the Subdivision Improvements or any buildings within the Subdivision will be transported using the haul routes established by the City. The City designates the haul routes as Meander Road to Arrowhead Drive to T.H. 55 and Meander Road to County Road 116. 6. Construction of Subdivision Improvements. a) All Subdivision Improvements shall be installed in accordance with the Plans, the City Approvals, this Agreement, the City’s subdivision regulations, the City’s engineering standards (as hereinafter defined) for utility construction, and the requirements of the report from the City engineer dated ______________, 2023. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications for the Subdivision Improvements prepared by a registered professional engineer. The Developer shall obtain any necessary permits from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and any other agency having jurisdiction before proceeding with construction. The City shall inspect all work at the Developer’s expense. The Developer, its ME230-800-859539.v4 5 contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City’s inspectors. Prior to beginning construction, the Developer or the Developer’s engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting with all parties concerned, including the City staff and engineers, to review the program for the construction work. b) Within 45 days after the completion of the Subdivision Improvements, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible “as constructed” plans and three complete sets of paper “as constructed” plans, each prepared in accordance with City standards and in AutoCADD format based on Hennepin County coordinates. Sanitary sewer, water and stormwater “as constructed” plans shall also be submitted to the City in GIS format compatible with ArcMap 10 in the coordinates and with the attributes directed by the City Engineer. Iron monuments must be installed in the Subdivision in accordance with state law. The Developer’s surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. Subject to events of force majeure that are entirely outside of the Developer’s control and unless otherwise extended by the City, in its sole discretion, all Subdivision Improvements required by this Agreement shall be completed by no later than __________________, 20___, unless specifically noted otherwise in this Agreement. c) The Developer agrees to require its contractor to provide to the City a warranty bond for the improvements to Meander Road, sanitary sewer, and municipal water distribution system that will become public to cover defects in labor and materials for a period of two years from the date of completion of such improvements. During such warranty period, the Developer agrees to repair or replace, or to cause its contractor to repair or replace, any defective Subdivision Improvement, or portion or element thereof, normal wear and tear excepted. A decision regarding whether a Subdivision Improvement is defective shall be made by the City in the reasonable exercise of its judgment. If the Developer or its contractor fails to repair or replace a defective Subdivision Improvement during the warranty period after prior written notice to Developer and opportunity to cure as provided in section 22 of this Agreement, the City may repair or replace the defective portion and may use the Letter of Credit, as hereinafter defined, to reimburse itself for such costs. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City fully for the cost of all defective Subdivision Improvement repairs or replacement if the cost thereof exceeds the remaining amount of the Letter of Credit. Such reimbursement must be made within 45 days of the date upon which the City notifies the Developer of the cost due under this section. If the Developer fails to make required payments to the City, the Developer hereby consents to the City levying special assessments for any unreimbursed amount associated with such costs against the lots in the Subdivision which are benefited by the Subdivision Improvement. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges the benefit to the lots within the Subdivision of the repair or replacement of the Subdivision Improvements and hereby consents to such assessment and waives the right to a hearing or notice of hearing or any appeal thereon under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. d) Construction of the Subdivision Improvements will require some wetland filling and will necessitate the submission and approval of a Wetland Conservation Act Wetland Replacement Plan. The Developer shall strictly adhere to all requirements of the approved Wetland Replacement Plan. ME230-800-859539.v4 6 7. Shared Driveway. The Developer will construct a shared driveway over Outlot A of the Subdivision, in accordance with the Plans, to serve each of the four twin home lots (the “Shared Driveway”). The Shared Driveway shall remain privately owned and maintained by the Developer, its successors in title, an HOA, as hereinafter defined, or by the individual lot owners within the Subdivision. The Developer will prepare, execute, and record a shared driveway easement or declaration instrument, which must provide for perpetual access rights to the owners of all four twin home lots over the portion the Shared Driveway necessary to adequately access their respective lots. Said instrument shall be in a form acceptable to the city attorney, and no building permits will be issued for any of the twin home lot unless and until said declaration has been duly recorded. 8. Meander Road Improvements and Access to Commercial Lots. a) To facilitate the transportation needs prompted by the commercial development, the Plans include certain improvements to Meander Road, including the construction of a left turn lane into the portion of the Subdivision south of Meander Road. The improvements to Meander Road shall be completed by the time all other Subdivision Improvements are completed. b) There is no public or private road planned within the commercial area of the Subdivision which will provide access to the commercial lots. Ingress and egress to Meander Road will be by means of an access over a portion of Lot 1, Block 2 and drive aisles or other similar improvements to all lots contained within Block 2. The Developer must record an easement instrument burdening Lot 1, Block 2 and benefiting Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 2 which provides adequate pedestrian and vehicular access to and from Meander Road for all lots south of Meander Road. The instrument creating said easements must be reviewed and approved by the city attorney prior to its recordation. c) The Developer shall provide a secondary access from Meander Road to the four commercial lots in a location and of a design reasonably approved by the city engineer. The secondary access must be maintained and kept open by the Developer, its successors and assigns, throughout the year. d) While no direct vehicular access between the commercial portion of the Subdivision and the property to the east is planned at the present time, such an access may be needed in the future upon development of the abutting property. The Developer shall design the parking and drive aisles on the commercial portion of the Subdivision so that, upon notice by the City to the Developer, an access point could be constructed to the property to the east or any public or private street adjacent to the Subdivision. 9. Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements. The Developer agrees to construct all sanitary sewer and water improvements to serve the residential lots and the commercial lots within the Subdivision. The Developer’s work in constructing and extending the utilities must be in accordance with the Plans and must comply with all City requirements regarding such utilities. The sanitary sewer main and water main extensions for the residential lots will be dedicated by the Developer to the City as public improvements upon completion and acceptance by the City notwithstanding their location underneath the Shared Driveway. All sewer and water utilities and hydrants located on the commercial lots shall be located in easements dedicated to the public on the plat but such utilities will be privately maintained. ME230-800-859539.v4 7 10. Stormwater Improvements. a) The Developer agrees to construct the stormwater facilities in accordance with the Plans and in compliance with all City requirements regarding such improvements. The stormwater facilities include but are not limited to the dry basin north of Meander Road and the biofiltration and underground storage south of Meander Road, all as shown on the Plans. In the event that the Developer installs a well to supplement the water used by its irrigation reuse system for the commercial lots, it shall meter and keep record of the amount of water utilized by said well and it shall make said records available to the City upon request. The Developer acknowledges that an appropriation permit may be required depending on the amount of water utilized by said well, per state requirements. b) The stormwater facilities serving the Subdivision will remain private and will be maintained by the Developer at its sole expense until taken over by the HOA (north of Meander Road), as hereinafter defined, or the individual property owners (south of Meander Road). The City does not intend to accept the stormwater facilities as public and does not intend to maintain them. In order to meet the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission and City code, the Developer agrees to enter into two Stormwater Maintenance Agreements with the City, one for the residential portion of the Subdivision north of Meander Road and one for the commercial portion of Subdivision south of Meander Road. The agreements shall be in the general form attached hereto as Exhibit C. The purpose of the Stormwater Maintenance Agreements is to ensure that the Developer maintains the stormwater facilities until taken over by the HOA or individual property owners, as the case may be, and to give the City the right but not the obligation to do so if the Developer or any successor fails in its obligations. The Stormwater Maintenance Agreements will be recorded against the respective portions of the Subdivision and will run with the land. The Developer acknowledges that i) the stormwater facilities have not and will not be accepted by the City; ii) the City does not plan to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement of the stormwater facilities and that the Developer and ultimately the HOA or individual property owners will have primary responsibility for such work; iii) the City has the right but not the obligation to perform necessary work upon the failure or refusal by the responsible party to do so; and iv) if the City performs any work on the stormwater facilities after reasonable notice to the Developer, HOA, or individual property owners, as the case may be, and the failure of any responsible party or parties to perform the work, the City intends to specially assess the cost of such work against the lots within the Subdivision benefited by the stormwater facilities. c) The Developer will make an HOA responsible for the maintenance, repair or replacement of the residential stormwater facilities north of Meander Road as needed and the HOA documents recorded with Hennepin County shall so require. Likewise, the Developer will make the individual property owners south of Meander Road responsible for the maintenance, repair or replacement of the commercial stormwater facilities as needed and a declaration recorded against said lots with Hennepin County shall so require. The Developer agrees to inform purchasers of lots within the Subdivision that i) the City does not plan to maintain or pay for maintenance, repair or replacement of the stormwater facilities and that either the HOA (north of Meander Road) or individual property owners (south of Meander Road) will have primary responsibility for such work; ii) the City has the right but not the obligation to perform necessary work upon the failure or refusal by the responsible party to do so; and iii) if the City performs any work on the stormwater ME230-800-859539.v4 8 facilities after reasonable notice to the responsible party and the failure to perform the work, the City intends to recover the cost of such work against the benefitting lots within the Subdivision. d) The Developer acknowledges that the City intends to establish a storm sewer improvement tax district to include all land to the north of Meander Road. The district will be established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, sections 444.16 to 444.21 and will authorize the City to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain, and otherwise improve storm sewer systems and related improvements within or serving said property if such work becomes necessary in the opinion of the City. In recognition of this possibility, the Developer agrees to provide prospective lot purchasers with a disclosure statement informing them of the existence of the storm sewer improvement tax district and that a tax could be imposed on the residential lots within the Subdivision if the City is required to repair or maintain the storm sewer systems and related improvements. The wording of the disclosure statement must be approved by the City for use in connection with the sale of residential lots in the Subdivision prior to its distribution or use by the Developer. e) Notwithstanding the City’s longstanding policy and practice of requiring that stormwater facilities be privately inspected and maintained by the respective property owners and/or owners’ associations served by them, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be interpreted to prohibit or in any way limit the City from amending that policy and practice, via ordinance or otherwise, and taking over such inspection and maintenance responsibilities, if deemed necessary by the City in its sole discretion and irrespective of compliance with the provisions contained herein by the Developer, the HOA, or the individual lot owners. 11. Landscaping Plan; Landscape Irrigation Plan; Tree Removal. a) The Developer agrees to install landscaping in accordance with the Plans. All landscaping shall include hardy, non- invasive and drought tolerant species appropriate for Minnesota in accordance with the Plans. All landscaping materials shall be maintained and replaced if they die within two years from the date of installation. b) Any automatic water irrigation system utilized within the Subdivision shall be equipped with rain sensors or soil moisture sensors. Any automatic water irrigation system utilized within the commercial portion of the Subdivision is subject to the City’s irrigation ordinance and water conservation ordinance which prohibits the use of treated municipal water in connection with landscape irrigation systems. Notwithstanding the aforementioned prohibition regarding water irrigation systems, water may be utilized from the public water system for a limited period of time until the landscaping material within the applicable portion of the Subdivision has been established. The Developer will submit the plans for the irrigation system prior to any permit being issued for any structures within the Subdivision. c) The City has approved a tree removal plan, as part of the Plans, that permits the Developer to remove more trees within the Subdivision than is otherwise permitted due to the predominance of ash, box elder and cottonwood trees on the Property. Any tree removal on the Property beyond what is permitted in the Plans shall be subject to replacement or fees in accordance with the City’s tree preservation ordinance. ME230-800-859539.v4 9 12. Lighting. The Developer agrees to install lighting within the Subdivision at its sole cost. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Developer shall submit lighting details to the City for review and approval by City staff. All lighting shall meet City standards and shall be equipped with luminaries which allow no light more than five percent above the horizontal plane. The Developer shall ensure that the lighting does not exceed 0.5FC at the property line. The HOA (north of Meander Road) or individual property owners (south of Meander Road), as the case may be, will be required to maintain the lighting fixtures and said improvements will not be accepted by the City as public improvements. 13. Trails and Boardwalk. a) The trails and boardwalk shall be constructed by the Developer in accordance with the Plans. The boardwalk and private trails shall be owned and maintained by the individual property owners. The City shall have no obligation to maintain, repair, or replace the boardwalk or private trails. b) The Developer shall construct a trail on the north side of Meander Road from the eastern Property line to the crossing at the commercial access. Following the satisfactory completion of said trail, the City will accept it as a public improvement and thereafter, the Developer shall have no obligation to maintain, repair, or replace the public trail. The Developer shall also execute a trail easement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D. 14. Additional Parking; Management of Lodging. a) The proposed commercial uses have an aggregate parking requirement under the city code of 254 spaces but the portion of the site south of Meander Road has only 230 spaces planned. While this may be adequate a majority of the time because parking demand will occur at different times of the day for different uses, there are likely to be occasions when parking is insufficient when the event center is in use. To accommodate peak parking demand, the Developer agrees to enter into an agreement with one or more owners of nearby property allowing overflow parking from the Subdivision on nearby property. Developer shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause such an agreement to remain in place at all times and be satisfactory to the City. Accommodation of parking needs on the commercial site shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer, and accordingly, the Developer agrees that it will limit attendance in the event center if parking, whether on-site or as provided through any parking agreement with nearby owners, is anticipated to be insufficient. b) The commercial portion of the Subdivision will include 12-16 lodging rooms for the use of overnight guests attending functions at the proposed event center. Said lodging accommodations must be actively managed on site and the Developer will, prior to operation, submit a plan reasonably satisfactory to the City detailing how the lodging units will be staffed and managed. 15. Letter of Credit. a) In order to ensure completion of the Subdivision Improvements required under this Agreement and satisfaction of all fees due to the City, the Developer agrees to deliver to the City prior to the City’s release of the final plat of the Subdivision for recording, a letter of credit (the “Letter of Credit”) in the amount of $__________ which represents 150 percent of the estimated cost of the Subdivision Improvements as specified in the Plans. This amount represents the maximum risk exposure for the City, based on the anticipated sequence of construction and the estimate of cost of each element of the Subdivision Improvements, rather than ME230-800-859539.v4 10 the aggregate cost of all required Subdivision Improvements. The Letter of Credit shall be delivered to the City prior to beginning any work on the Subdivision Improvements and shall renew automatically thereafter or be replaced with a new Letter of Credit 60 days prior to the expiration thereof until released by the City. The estimated cost of the work covered by the Letter of Credit is itemized on Exhibit E attached hereto. The Letter of Credit shall be issued by a bank determined by the City to be solvent and creditworthy and shall be in a form acceptable to the City. The Letter of Credit shall allow the City to draw upon the instrument, in whole or part, in order to complete construction of any or all of the Subdivision Improvements and other specified work within the Subdivision and to pay any fees or costs due to the City by the Developer after written notice to Developer and Developer’s failure to cure the default as provided in section 22 of this Agreement. b) The amount of the Letter of Credit may be reduced as the Subdivision Improvements are completed upon written request from the Developer. Upon such request, the City agrees to reduce the Letter of Credit to an amount roughly equal to 150 percent of the cost of the remaining work, subject to evaluation of the City’s maximum risk exposure and satisfaction of the Developer’s financial obligations to the City. The Letter of Credit shall be released in full and returned to the Developer within 60 days following completion of all Subdivision Improvements and acceptance of all public elements of the Improvements; expiration of the two-year warranty period for the landscaping and after satisfaction of all financial obligations by the Developer to the City. Prior to releasing any portion of the Letter of Credit or accepting another letter of credit in replacement, the City shall first be satisfied regarding the quality and completeness of the work and that the Developer has taken such steps as may be necessary to ensure that no liens will attach to the Subdivision. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Letter of Credit shall not be reduced to less than $50,000, until such time as the City releases the entire Letter of Credit and subject to delivery of the required warranty bond to the City. c) It is the intention of the parties that the City at all times have available to it a Letter of Credit in an amount adequate to ensure completion of all elements of the Subdivision Improvements and other obligations of the Developer under this Agreement. To that end and notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, all requests by the Developer for a reduction or release of the Letter of Credit shall be evaluated by the City in light of that principle. d) If at any time the City reasonably determines that the bank issuing the Letter of Credit no longer satisfies the City’s requirements regarding solvency and creditworthiness, the City shall notify the Developer and the Developer shall provide to the City within 30 days a substitute Letter of Credit from another bank meeting the City’s requirements. If within 30 days of notice the Developer fails to provide the City with a substitute Letter of Credit from an issuing bank satisfactory to the City, the City may draw under the existing Letter of Credit. 16. Homeowners’ Association. a) The Developer agrees to establish a homeowners’ association (the “HOA”), which shall include all residential land within the Subdivision. The Developer agrees to record covenants against said land for this purpose, which covenants must be in form and substance acceptable to the City. The covenants shall be filed by the Developer with Hennepin County prior to any building permits being issued for the twin homes. ME230-800-859539.v4 11 b) The HOA covenants must provide, among other things, for HOA maintenance of the Shared Driveway, lighting and signage along the Shared Driveway, stormwater facilities, upland buffers, the private landscape irrigation system (if any), and all common areas in the residential portion of the Subdivision. The City must approve the HOA covenants and will require that certain provisions thereof may not be amended or deleted without prior written City approval. 17. Wetlands; Upland Buffer Easement Agreement. The Developer also agrees to execute two Upland Buffer Easement Agreements in the form attached hereto as Exhibit F, one for the residential portion of the Subdivision north of Meander Road and one for the commercial portion of Subdivision south of Meander Road. The purpose of said agreements is to enhance water quality in the wetlands; provide, following completion of construction, no structures or fill are placed in those areas; and to ensure that those areas are maintained in such condition thereafter. The materials to be planted within the disturbed areas are specified in the Plans and vegetation therein shall be established consistent with the City’s ordinances. The Upland Buffer Easement Agreements will be recorded against the respective portions of the Subdivision and will run with the land. The Developer agrees to make the HOA responsible for its maintenance obligations under the Upland Buffer Easement Agreement for the area north of Meander Road and the individual property owners responsible for its maintenance obligations under the Upland Buffer Easement Agreement for the area south of Meander Road. 18. Tamarack Drive Improvements. Increased traffic volumes to and from the Property resulting from the Subdivision Improvements and the Developer’s commercial development will contribute to the need for improvements to Tamarack Drive near the Property, which will include, without limitation, street improvements north of T.H. 55 and intersection and signaling improvements at Tamarack Drive and T.H. 55 (collectively, the “Tamarack Drive Improvements”). Instead of the City requiring the Developer to construct the Tamarack Drive Improvements immediately and bear the cost of said project prematurely, the parties have determined that it is preferable for the Tamarack Drive Improvements to be constructed in the future and for the Developer to contribute to said project only at that time, if and when the project is constructed by the City. Accordingly, the Developer agrees to enter into a Petition and Waiver Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit G to ensure that the City has a valid and collectible assessment for the Tamarack Drive Improvements. 19. City Trunk Connection Rates; SAC Fees. a) In accordance with City policy and to distribute uniformly the costs of public utility infrastructure improvements, the City will charge trunk connection fees for the availability of sanitary sewer and water within the Subdivision. The rates are typically adjusted annually. The trunk connection fees for sanitary sewer and water shall be payable by the person or entity that obtains a building permit for the applicable lot at the time of issuance of such building permit at the then-current rates. b) The Metropolitan Council also charges the City a sewer availability charge for each new connection to the metropolitan sanitary sewer disposal system or increase in capacity demand. Any sewer availability charge paid by the City to the Metropolitan Council shall be reimbursed by the person or entity that obtains the building permit for the applicable lot at the time of issuance of such building permit. The Metropolitan Council’s current rate is $2,485 per unit. ME230-800-859539.v4 12 20. Park Dedication Requirements. The Subdivision contains a mix of residential and commercial uses. The City has carefully reviewed the type and intensity of the proposed commercial uses and evaluated their likely impact on the recreational needs of the community. Based on that analysis, the Developer shall meet its park dedication obligations, as required in the City’s subdivision ordinance, through land dedication and fee in lieu. Specifically, the Developer shall execute a trail easement and construct the public trail as required in section 13 of this Agreement. Upon acceptance of the public trail, the City shall be responsible for all costs of maintenance, repair and replacement of the public trail. In addition, the Developer shall pay a fee in lieu of $64,640 to satisfy the remainder of its park dedication requirement. Such fee shall be paid prior to the City’s release of the plat of Meander Park and Boardwalk for recording. 21. Responsibility for Costs; Escrow for Construction Inspection. a) The Developer agrees to pay to the City an administrative fee in the amount necessary to reimburse the City for its reasonable costs and expenses in reviewing the Subdivision, including the drafting and negotiation of this Agreement and other necessary documents. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City in full for such reasonable costs within 45 days after notice in writing by the City. The Developer further agrees to reimburse the City for the reasonable cost incurred in the enforcement of any provision of this Agreement, including reasonable engineering and attorneys’ fees. Reimbursement of such costs and fees shall be subject to the Developer’s right to review of invoices, billing records, and other data to ensure that the costs are reasonable and fairly attributed to the Subdivision. b) The Developer shall also pay a fee for City construction observation and administration relating to construction of the Subdivision Improvements. Construction observation shall include inspection of all the Subdivision Improvements. In order to reimburse the City for the reasonable cost of inspection of the Subdivision Improvements, the Developer shall deposit an additional $____________ into an escrow account with the City, which shall receive and hold such funds solely under the terms of this Agreement. The City shall reimburse itself for expenses from the escrow and will provide the Developer with a copy of any invoice from the city engineer or evidence of other cost or expense attributed to the escrow prior to deducting such funds from the escrow. If any funds held under this escrow exceed the amount necessary to reimburse the City for its costs under this section, such funds shall be returned to the Developer without interest. If it appears that the actual costs incurred will exceed the estimate, the Developer and the City shall review the costs required to complete the project and the Developer shall deposit additional sums with the City. Reimbursement of such costs and fees shall be subject to the Developer’s right to review of invoices, billing records, and other data to ensure that the costs are reasonable and fairly attributed to construction of the Subdivision Improvements. 22. Developer’s Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to construction or repair of any of the Subdivision Improvements or any other work or undertaking required by this Agreement, and such default continues for 30 days after the City provides notice to the Developer of the nature of the default pursuant to the notice requirements in this Agreement, or if such default cannot be cured within 30 days, after such time period as may be reasonably required to cure the default provided that Developer is making a good faith effort to cure said default, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City in doing so. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not ME230-800-859539.v4 13 be necessary for the City to seek an order from any court for permission to enter the Property for such purposes. If the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, levy special assessments against the lots within the applicable portion of the Subdivision to recover the costs thereof, except those which have been sold to individual homeowners. For this purpose, the Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, expressly waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments, including but not limited to, hearing requirements and any claim that the assessments exceed the benefit to the land so assessed. The Developer, for itself and its successors and assigns, also waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 429.081. 23. Insurance. The Developer agrees to take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six months after the City has accepted the public Subdivision Improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer’s work or the work of its contractors or subcontractors. Liability limits shall not be less than $500,000 when the claim is one for death by wrongful act or omission or for any other claim and $1,500,000 for any number of claims arising out of a single occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy. The certificate of insurance shall provide that the City must be given the same advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance as is afforded to the Developer. 24. No Building Permits Approved; Certificates of Occupancy. a) Approvals granted to date by the City regarding the Subdivision do not include approval of a building permit for any structure within the Subdivision. The party applying for a building permit must submit and the City must approve building plans prior to an application for a building permit for a structure on any lot within the Subdivision. All building pads must be certified prior to initiation of construction. The party applying for a building permit shall be responsible for payment of the customary fees associated with the building permit and all other deferred fees as specified in this Agreement. b) No building permit shall be issued for any structure within the Subdivision until utilities and adequate access are available to the respective lot, provided, however, that no certificate of occupancy shall thereafter be issued until all utilities are available and the first lift of bituminous has been completed for all streets, drive aisles or other improvements providing access to said lot. c) Additionally, no certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any twin home constructed in the Subdivision unless prior thereto the lot has been graded and all landscaping installed in accordance with the Plans, the Shared Driveway and any individual driveway has been installed, the footing drain tile or sump pump is discharging in an approved location, the water service valve is in proper working order and an as built survey of the lot has been submitted and approved by the City. In cases in which seasonal weather conditions, acts of god, supply chain disruptions, or other circumstances beyond the control of the Developer, which make compliance with these conditions impossible, the City will accept an escrow of sufficient amount to ensure completion of the work during the following construction season. ME230-800-859539.v4 14 25. Clean up and Dust Control. The Developer shall clean , or caused to be cleaned, on a daily basis if deemed necessary, dirt and debris from streets adjoining the Subdivision resulting from construction work by the Developer, its contractors, agents or assigns, including any party constructing buildings within the Subdivision. Prior to any construction on the Property, the Developer shall identify to the City in writing a responsible party for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. The Developer shall provide dust control to the reasonable satisfaction of the City’s engineer throughout construction within the Subdivision. 26. Compliance with Laws. The Developer agrees to comply with all laws, resolutions, ordinances, regulations and directives of the state of Minnesota and the City applicable to the Subdivision. This Agreement shall be construed according to the laws of Minnesota. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall, among other remedies available to the City, be grounds for denial of building permits for lots within the Subdivision. 27. Agreement Runs with the Land. This Agreement shall run with the Property and shall be recorded against the title thereto and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the City and the Developer and their successors and assigns. The Developer’s successors in title may be responsible for certain obligations under this Agreement as required by the City. Upon request by Developer or its successors or assigns, the City will issue a certificate in recordable form which certifies the extent which the Developer is in compliance with the terms of this Agreement. As of the date hereof, the Developer warrants that to Developer’s actual knowledge, there are no unrecorded encumbrances or interests relating to the Property, except as herein contemplated. In the event that any financing documents are made of record prior to the recording of any instrument referenced or required herein, the Developer agrees to use commercially reasonable efforts to secure any respective mortgagee’s consent to ensure such instruments will not be extinguished in the event of foreclosure. The Developer agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. This Agreement and all documents referenced herein shall be recorded against the Property in an order approved by the city attorney. 28. Indemnification. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from approval of the Subdivision. The Developer hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, except matters involving intentional acts or gross negligence by the City or its agents or employees. 29. Assignment. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the prior written permission of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or denied. 30. Notices. Any notice or correspondence to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed to be given if delivered personally or sent by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested: ME230-800-859539.v4 15 a) as to Developer: Medina Ventures, LLC 4130 Fescue Dr Medina, MN 55340 Attn: Chris Pederson with a copy to: Mark S. Radke Felhaber Larson 220 South Sixth Street, Suite 2200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attention: City Administrator with a copy to: David T. Anderson Kennedy & Graven 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this section. The Developer shall notify the City if there is any change in its name or address. 31. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall pertain only to such section and shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other section or provision of this Agreement. 32. Non-waiver. Each right, power or remedy conferred upon the City by this Agreement is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, or available to the City at law or in equity, or under any other agreement. Each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. If either party waives in writing any default or nonperformance by the other party, such waiver shall be deemed to apply only to such event and shall not waive any other prior or subsequent default. 33. Estoppel Certificate; Partial Release. a) The City agrees, within 10 business days after receipt of written request by the Developer, to execute a certification in writing and in such form as will enable it to be recorded in the proper office for the recordation of deeds and other instruments that (i) this Agreement is unmodified and in full force and effect, or if there have been modifications, the identify of such modifications and that the same are in full force and effect as modified; (ii) no party is in default under any provisions of this Agreement or, if there has been a default, the nature of such default; (iii) all Subdivision Improvements to be constructed under this Agreement have been constructed, or, if not, specifying the Subdivision Improvements yet to be constructed; and (iv) as to ME230-800-859539.v4 16 any other matter that the requesting party shall reasonably request. Any such statement on behalf of the City may be executed by the city administrator without city council approval. b) Following the Developer’s completion of the Subdivision Improvements and all other obligations contained herein, and at the written request of the Developer, the City agrees to execute a certification in writing releasing the lot or lots from the Developer’s obligations under this Agreement. Such certification shall not release the lot or lots from any ongoing obligations of the HOA or individual lot owners, as applicable, the liability under the storm sewer improvement tax district or any other ongoing obligations regarding the Subdivision. 34. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original and shall constitute one and the same Agreement. ********************* ME230-800-859539.v4 17 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written. CITY OF MEDINA By: __________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor By: __________________________________ Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2023, by Kathleen Martin, the mayor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2023, by Scott T. Johnson, the city administrator of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public ME230-800-859539.v4 18 THE DEVELOPER: By: Chris Pederson Its: Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 2023, by Chris Pederson, the Manager of Medina Ventures, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ____________________________________ Notary Public This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 A-1 ME230-800-859539.v4 EXHIBIT A TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Property Lots 1 through 4, Block 1; Lots 1 through 4, Block 2; and Outlots A, B and C, all in Meander Park and Boardwalk, Hennepin County, Minnesota ME230-800-859539.v4 B-1 EXHIBIT B TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT List of Plan Documents [to be included] C-1 ME230-800-859539.v4 EXHIBIT C TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the ____ day of _________, 2023, by and between the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”), and Medina Ventures, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer is the fee owner of certain real property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the City has obtained drainage and utility easements over portions of the Property (the “Easement Areas”); and WHEREAS, by a separate planned unit development agreement (the “PUD Agreement”), the Developer has agreed to construct and maintain certain stormwater facilities (the “Stormwater Improvements”) for the benefit of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Stormwater Improvements which are the subject of this Agreement include, but are not necessarily limited to, the [dry basin or biofiltration and underground storage] and all related facilities. The location of the Stormwater Improvements are shown on Exhibit B attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission requires permanent provisions for handling of storm runoff, including terms and conditions for operation and maintenance of all Stormwater Improvements, and requires such provisions to be set forth in an agreement to be recorded against the Property; and WHEREAS, the City and the Developer intend to comply with certain conditions, including entering into a maintenance agreement regarding the Stormwater Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants of the parties set forth herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer, for itself and its successor or assigns, agrees to maintain the Stormwater Improvements and observe all drainage laws governing the operation and maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements. The Developer or its successors or assigns shall make periodic inspection and perform maintenance of the Stormwater Improvements as described in Exhibit C attached hereto. The Developer or its successors or assigns shall make all such scheduled inspections and maintenance, keep record of all inspections and maintenance activities, and submit such records annually to the City. The cost C-2 ME230-800-859539.v4 of all inspections and maintenance, including but not limited to skimming and cleaning of the Stormwater Improvements, shall be the obligation of the Developer and its successors or assigns as the fee owner of the Property, which obligation shall be assigned to the HOA, as defined hereinafter, in accordance with section 7 of this Agreement. 2. City’s Maintenance Rights. The City may inspect the Stormwater Improvements at any time and shall have the right to enter upon the Easement Areas and such portions of the Property as may reasonably be necessary to gain access to the Easement Areas to perform such inspections. Additionally, the City may maintain the Stormwater Improvements, as provided in this paragraph, if the Developer or its successors or assigns has failed to maintain the Stormwater Improvements in accordance with applicable drainage laws and other requirements set forth herein and such failure continues for 30 days after the City gives the Developer or its successors or assigns written notice of such failure or, if such tasks cannot be completed within 30 days, after such time period as may be reasonably required to complete the required tasks provided that Developer or its successors or assigns is making a good faith effort to complete said task. The City’s notice shall specifically state which maintenance tasks are to be performed. If Developer does not complete the maintenance tasks within the required time period after such notice is given by the City, the City shall have the right to enter upon the Easement Areas and such portions of the Property as may reasonably be necessary to gain access to the Easement Areas to perform such maintenance tasks. In such case, the City shall send an invoice of its reasonable maintenance costs to the Developer or its successors or assigns, which shall include all reasonable staff time, engineering and legal and other reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City. If the Developer or its successors or assigns fails to reimburse the City for its costs and expenses reasonably incurred in maintaining the Stormwater Improvements within 30 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof against the Property. The Developer, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges that the maintenance work performed by the City regarding the Stormwater Improvements benefits the Property in an amount which exceeds the assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of an emergency, as reasonably determined by the city engineer, the 30- day notice requirement to the Developer or its successors or assigns for failure to perform maintenance tasks shall be and hereby is waived in its entirety, and the Developer or its successors or assigns shall reimburse the City and be subject to assessment for any expense so incurred by the City in the same manner as if written notice as described above has been given. 3. Hold Harmless. The Developer or its successors or assigns hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents and employees against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) arising out of or resulting from the Developer’s or its successors or assigns, or their respective agents’ or employees’ negligent or intentional acts, or any violation of any safety law, regulation or code in the performance of this Agreement, without regard to any inspection or review made or not made by the City, its agents or employees or failure by the City, its agents or employees to take any other prudent precautions, except to the extent of intentional or grossly negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. In the event the City, upon the failure of the Developer or its successors or assigns to comply with any conditions of this Agreement, performs said conditions pursuant to its authority in this Agreement, the Developer or its successors or assigns C-3 ME230-800-859539.v4 shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its employees, agents and representatives for its own negligent acts in the performance of the Developer’s or its successors or assigns required work under this Agreement, but this indemnification shall not extend to intentional or grossly negligent acts of the City, its employees, agents and representatives. 4. Costs of Enforcement. The Developer or its successors or assigns agrees to reimburse the City for all reasonable costs prudently incurred by the City in the enforcement of this Agreement, or any portion thereof, including court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees after providing written notice to Developer or its successors or assigns and a reasonable opportunity to cure. 5. Rights Not Exclusive. No right of the City under this Agreement shall be deemed to be exclusive and the City shall retain all rights and powers it may have under Minnesota Statutes, sections 444.16 to 444.21 to acquire, construct, reconstruct, extend, maintain and otherwise improve the Stormwater Improvements. 6. Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall either be personally delivered or be sent by United States certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows: a) as to Developer: Medina Ventures, LLC 4130 Fescue Dr Medina, MN 55340 Attn: Chris Pederson with a copy to: Mark S. Radke Felhaber Larson 220 South Sixth Street, Suite 2200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attention: City Administrator with a copy to: David T. Anderson Kennedy & Graven 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. 7. Successors and Assigns; City Policy. All duties and obligations of Developer under this Agreement shall also be duties and obligations of Developer’s successors and assigns. The C-4 ME230-800-859539.v4 terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon the recordation of a declaration in a form satisfactory to the City which requires either an HOA or the individual owners of the lots that make up the Property to collectively perform the obligations and responsibilities of the Developer under this Agreement, said party or parties, as the case may be, shall be bound by all terms and conditions of this Agreement as if it were the original signatory hereto and the Developer, its successors and assigns, shall be released from all personal liability under this Agreement but the Property shall remain subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the City’s longstanding policy and practice of requiring that stormwater facilities, including the Stormwater Improvements, be privately inspected and maintained by the respective property owners and/or owners’ associations served by them, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be interpreted to prohibit or in any way limit the City from amending that policy and practice, via ordinance or otherwise, and taking over such inspection and maintenance responsibilities, if deemed necessary by the City in its sole discretion and irrespective of the Developer’s, the HOA’s, or the individual lot owners’ compliance with the provisions contained herein. 8. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be binding and effective as of the date first written above. [signature pages to follow] C-5 ME230-800-859539.v4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written. CITY OF MEDINA By: __________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor By: __________________________________ Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2023, by Kathleen Martin, the mayor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2023, by Scott T. Johnson, the city administrator of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public C-6 ME230-800-859539.v4 THE DEVELOPER: By: Chris Pederson Its: Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 2023, by Chris Pederson, the Manager of Medina Ventures, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ____________________________________ Notary Public This document drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 C-A-1 ME230-800-859539.v4 EXHIBIT A TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Legal Description of the Property [to be inserted] C-B-1 ME230-800-859539.v4 EXHIBIT B TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Depiction of Location of Stormwater Improvements [to be inserted] C-C-1 ME230-800-859539.v4 EXHIBIT C TO STORMWATER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT [to be inserted] D-1 ME230-800-859539.v4 EXHIBIT D TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF TRAIL EASEMENT TRAIL EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT is made by Medina Ventures, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, Grantor, in favor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, Grantee. Recitals A. Grantor is the fee owner of the property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota and legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”). B. Grantor desires to grant to the Grantee a trail easement, according to the terms and conditions contained herein. C. The easement is legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto. The easement is depicted in Exhibit C attached hereto. Terms of Easements 1. Grant of Easement. For good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged by Grantor, Grantor grants and conveys to the Grantee a perpetual, non-exclusive easement for public trail purposes over, under, across and through the portion of the Property legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto. 2. Scope of Easement. The perpetual easement for trail purposes granted herein includes the right of the Grantee, its contractors, agents, and employees to locate, construct, operate, maintain, alter and repair trail facilities within the described easement area. The easement granted herein also includes the right to cut, trim, or remove from the easement areas trees, shrubs, or other vegetation which unreasonably interfere with the easement or facilities of the Grantee, its successors or assigns. The Grantor shall have no obligation to maintain, repair, or replace the public trails. 3. Warranty of Title. The Grantor warrants that it is the owner of the Property and has the right, title and capacity to convey to the Grantee the easement herein. 4. Environmental Matters. The Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs, expenses, damages, demands, obligations, including penalties and reasonable attorney's fees, or losses resulting from any claims, actions, suits or proceedings based upon a release or threat of release of any hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants which may have existed on, or which relate to, the easement area or Property prior to the date of this instrument. D-2 ME230-800-859539.v4 5. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Grantee agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Grantor harmless from any liability, claim, loss, cost or expense, including reasonable attorney fees, solely and directly arising from or relating to the use, maintenance, repair or replacement of the trail facilities by the Grantee, its contractors, agents, and employees within the described easement area. 6. Binding Effect. The terms and conditions of this instrument shall run with the land and be binding on the Grantors, their heirs and assigns. STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: NONE Dated this _____ day of ______________, 2023. THE DEVELOPER: By: Chris Pederson Its: Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 2023, by Chris Pederson, the Manager of Medina Ventures, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ____________________________________ Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 ME230-800-859539.v4 D-A-1 EXHIBIT A TO TRAIL EASEMENT Legal Description of the Property [to be inserted] ME230-800-859539.v4 D-B-1 EXHIBIT B TO TRAIL EASEMENT Legal Description of Easement [to be inserted] ME230-800-859539.v4 D-C-1 EXHIBIT C TO TRAIL EASEMENT Depiction of Easement [to be inserted] ME230-800-859539.v4 E-1 EXHIBIT E TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE [to be added] ME230-800-859539.v4 F-1 EXHIBIT F TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF UPLAND BUFFER EASEMENT AGREEMENT This Upland Buffer Easement Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made this __ day of ____________, 2023 by and between the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”), and Medina Ventures, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Grantor”). RECITALS A. Grantor is the fee owner of property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”); and B. Grantor and the City have entered into a separate planned unit development agreement (the “PUD Agreement”) regarding the development of the Property. C. The City has rezoned the Property to Planned Unit Development, approved a General Plan of Development and granted approval of the plat of Meander Park and Boardwalk concerning the Property (collectively, the “City Approvals”), under the terms of which the Grantor is required to establish upland buffers adjacent to wetlands on portions of the Property consistent with City regulations, the location of which are legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto and depicted on Exhibit C attached hereto. Those areas described and depicted on Exhibits B and C shall be collectively referred to herein as the “Easement Area”. D. Grantor is willing to grant the Easement and to fulfill the other terms of this Agreement. PROVISIONS In consideration of the mutual promises of the parties contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Grantor hereby grants and conveys to the City and its successors and assigns, an Easement in, under, on, over and across the Easement Area, and the City hereby accepts such grant. The duration of this easement is perpetual, subject to Minnesota law governing granting of easements to governmental bodies, and shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties, their successors and assigns. 2. The following terms and conditions shall apply to the Easement Area: a. The Easement Area shall be planted with native grasses and other vegetation consistent with the Plans, as that term is defined in the PUD Agreement, and thereafter be preserved predominantly in its natural condition, except to the extent set forth below. Following construction of the Subdivision Improvements, as that ME230-800-859539.v4 F-2 term is defined in the PUD Agreement, no use shall be made of the Easement Area except uses, if any, which would not change or alter the condition of the Easement Area or its drainage, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, or fish and wildlife habitat and characteristics. b. No structures, hardcover or other improvements shall be constructed, erected, or placed upon, above, or beneath the Easement Area, with the exception of a boardwalk or dock not to exceed four feet in width to allow reasonable access to and across the wetland. c. Following construction of the Subdivision Improvements, no trees, shrubs or other vegetation shall be destroyed, cut or removed from the Easement Area except as is necessary to remove storm damage, diseased or non-native vegetation or as authorized by the prior written consent of the City consistent with the city code. A path no more than four feet in width may be mowed to allow reasonable access to the wetland. d. Following construction of the Subdivision Improvements, no earth, peat, gravel or soil, sand or any other natural material or substance shall be moved or removed from the Easement Area and there shall be no dredging or excavation of any nature whatsoever or any change of the topography of the Easement Area without the prior written consent of the City. e. No soil, sand, gravel or other substance or material as landfill shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Easement Area, and no waste, trash, yard waste, manure or other materials shall be placed, dumped or stored upon the Easement Area without the prior written consent of the City. 3. Grantor represents that Grantor owns the Easement Area in fee simple, subject only to the encumbrances of record. 4. The Grantor conveys to the City and its successors and assigns, the following rights: a. The City may enter upon the Easement Area for the purposes of inspection and enforcement of the covenants contained herein and to cause to be removed from the Easement Area without any liability any structures, uses, materials, substances, or unnatural matter inconsistent with the covenants contained herein and the natural state of the Easement Area. If there is a violation of the covenants contained herein, the City shall provide notice and an order for corrective action consistent with City regulations. If the Grantor does not take the required corrective action, the City may enter the Property in order to perform the action. In such case, the City shall send an invoice of its reasonable maintenance costs to the Grantor, which shall include all reasonable staff time, engineering and legal and other reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City. If the Grantor fails to reimburse the City for its costs and expenses within 45 days of receipt of an invoice for such costs, the City ME230-800-859539.v4 F-3 shall have the right to assess the full cost thereof against the Property. The Grantor, on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns, acknowledges that any such corrective work performed by the City benefits the Property in an amount which exceeds the assessment and hereby waives any right to hearing or notice and the right to appeal the assessments otherwise provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. b. The City may bring an action in any court of competent jurisdiction against the Grantor to enforce the terms of this Agreement; to require restoration of the Easement Area to its planted or more natural condition; to enjoin such non- compliance by temporary or permanent injunction and to recover any damages arising from such non-compliance. If a court determines that the Grantor has failed to comply with this Agreement, Grantor or Grantor’s successors or assigns shall reimburse the City for any reasonable costs of enforcement, including costs of restoration, court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, in addition to any other payments ordered by the court. 5. Grantor its succesors and assigns retains all responsibilities and shall bear all costs and liabilities of any kind related to ownership, operation and maintenance of the Property and the Easement Area. 6. Grantor or its succesors and assigns agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officials, employees and agents, against any and all loss, costs, damage and expense, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs that the City incurs because of the breach of any of the above covenants and/or resulting from or due to Grantor’s or its succesors and assigns intentional misrepresentation of any material fact contained therein. The Grantor or its succesors and assigns and the City agree that each shall be responsible for their own acts and the results of such acts and shall not be responsible for the act of the other party and the results of such acts. 7. This Agreement may be amended only by mutual written agreement of the parties. 8. Nothing herein shall give the general public a right of access to the Property. 9. Grantor’s obligations under this Agreement run with the Property and shall be binding on the Grantor’s successors and assigns. Grantor’s personal obligations under this Agreement terminate upon transfer or termination of its interest in the Property, provided that any liability for acts or omissions occurring prior to the transfer or termination shall survive that transfer or termination. Nothing in this Paragraph 9 is deemed to alter or amend the remaining terms of the Agreement in the event of a transfer of the Grantor’s interest. 10. Any notice required in this Agreement shall be delivered personally or sent by U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested: ME230-800-859539.v4 F-4 a) as to Developer: Medina Ventures, LLC 4130 Fescue Dr Medina, MN 55340 Attn: Chris Pederson with a copy to: Mark S. Radke Felhaber Larson 220 South Sixth Street, Suite 2200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attention: City Administrator with a copy to: David T. Anderson Kennedy & Graven 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. ************************ ME230-800-859539.v4 F-5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Upland Buffer Easement Agreement have caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year aforesaid. GRANTOR: By: Chris Pederson Its: Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 2023, by Chris Pederson, the Manager of Medina Ventures, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ____________________________________ Notary Public ME230-800-859539.v4 F-6 CITY OF MEDINA By: __________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor By: __________________________________ Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2023, by Kathleen Martin, the mayor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2023, by Scott T. Johnson, the city administrator of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public This instrument drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 ME230-800-859539.v4 F-A-1 EXHIBIT A TO UPLAND BUFFER AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description [to be included] ME230-800-859539.v4 F-B-1 EXHIBIT B TO UPLAND BUFFER AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT Legal Description of Upland Buffers [to be inserted] F-C-1 ME230-800-859539.v4 EXHIBIT C TO UPLAND BUFFER AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT Depiction of Upland Buffers [to be inserted] G-1 ME230-800-859539.v4 EXHIBIT G TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FORM OF PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT THIS PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made this ____ day of ______________, 2023, by and between the city of Medina, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota (the “City”), and Medina Ventures, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer owns certain land (the “Property”), which land is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the City has rezoned the Property to Planned Unit Development, approved a General Plan of Development and approved a final plat of Meander Park and Boardwalk (collectively, the “City Approvals”) to facilitate the commercial development of the Property; and WHEREAS, to accommodate increased traffic associated with development of the Property and surrounding lands, improvements are necessary on Tamarack Drive north of T.H. 55, including a signalized intersection and other improvements at Tamarack Drive and T.H. 55 (the “Tamarack Drive Improvements”); and WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the parties to avoid requiring the Developer and the owners of other properties to bear the expense of constructing the Tamarack Drive Improvements prematurely while offering the City sufficient assurances that the Developer and the owners of other benefited properties will pay for said work it is when completed; and WHEREAS, because of the size, cost and complexity of such a project, the City intends to construct the Tamarack Drive Improvements as a public project and assess benefited properties for the cost thereof; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to construct the Tamarack Drive Improvements without notices or hearings, provided the assurances and covenants hereinafter stated are made by the Developer to ensure that the City will have valid and collectable special assessments as it relates to the Property to finance a portion of the cost of the Tamarack Drive Improvements; and WHEREAS, were it not for the assurances and covenants hereinafter provided, the City would not construct the Tamarack Drive Improvements without such notices and hearings and would be doing so solely at the behest, and for the benefit, of the Developer; and G-2 ME230-800-859539.v4 WHEREAS, the parties have entered into this Agreement pursuant to and in satisfaction of the terms of the City Approvals previously granted by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, ON THE BASIS OF THE COVENANTS AND OBLIGATIONS CONTAINED HEREIN, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Developer represents and warrants that it has full legal power and authority to encumber the Property as herein provided, that in doing so it is not in violation of the terms or conditions of any instrument or agreement of any nature to which it is bound or which relates in any manner to the Property and that there are no other liens or encumbrances against the Property except those of record. 2. The Developer hereby petitions the City for construction of the Tamarack Drive Improvements at such time as the City, in its reasonable discretion, deems necessary. Such determination and subsequent initiation and construction of the project may be made by the City at any time within ten years following the date of this Agreement. This Agreement does not preclude the Developer from independently petitioning the City for construction of the Tamarack Drive Improvements or any other project at any time the Developer believes any public improvements are necessary or desirable. 3. The Developer consents to the City levying a special assessment for 5.6 percent of the costs of the Tamarack Drive Improvements against the Property, equally against each of the four lots, in accordance with Minn. Stat., Section 429.061. However, the total principal amount of the special assessments shall not exceed $85,253.26, or $21.313.31 per lot, indexed for increases in construction costs from the date of this Agreement, according to the ENR Construction Cost Index for Minneapolis, Minnesota, to the month and year of the start of construction of the Tamarack Drive Improvements. The current ENR Construction Cost Index is ______. $85,253.26 is 5.6 percent of the total estimated cost of the Tamarack Drive Improvements based on the preliminary plans, attached hereto as Exhibit B. The parties understand and agree that said plans might be modified if and when the Tamarack Drive Improvements are ultimately constructed and that the preliminary plans included on Exhibit B were created merely for the purpose of estimating the cost of construction based on the presently contemplated elements of the project. 4. The Developer waives notice of hearing and hearing pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 429.031, on the Tamarack Drive Improvements and notice of hearing and hearing on the special assessments levied to finance the Tamarack Drive Improvements pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 429.061 and specifically requests that the Tamarack Drive Improvements, as and when required, be constructed and the special assessments be levied against the Property without notice of hearing or hearing. 5. The Developer waives the right to appeal the levy of special assessments in accordance with this Agreement pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 429.081 and further specifically agrees with respect to such special assessments against the Property that: G-3 ME230-800-859539.v4 a. All requirements of Minn. Stat., Chapter 429 with which the City does not comply are hereby waived by the Developer; and b. The increase in fair market value of the Property resulting from construction of the Tamarack Drive Improvements will be at least equal to the amount of the special assessments levied against the Property and that such increase in fair market value is a special benefit to the Property. 6. The special assessments levied against the Property shall be payable over such period as the City may determine, but not less than 10 years, and shall bear interest at a rate determined by the City, but not more than 2 percent above the City’s cost of financing. The City’s cost of financing shall mean the average coupon rate if the City sells debt to finance the Tamarack Drive Improvements. If no debt is sold for the Tamarack Drive Improvements, the rate shall be set using the same formula based on special assessment bonds of Minnesota municipalities which have the same credit rating as that of the City and are issued and sold at approximately the same time as the adoption of the resolution levying the special assessments. The first installment of principal and interest shall be included in the first tax rolls completed after adoption of the resolution levying the special assessments. 7. The covenants, waivers and agreements contained in this Agreement shall bind the Developer and its successors and assigns and shall run with the Property. It is the intent of the parties hereto that this Agreement be in a form which is recordable among the land records of Hennepin County, Minnesota and the Developer and the City agree to make any changes in this Agreement which may be necessary to effect the recording and filing of this Agreement against the title of the Property. 8. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed given if delivered personally or sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, certified and return receipt requested: a) as to Developer: Medina Ventures, LLC 4130 Fescue Dr Medina, MN 55340 Attn: Chris Pederson with a copy to: Mark S. Radke Felhaber Larson 220 South Sixth Street, Suite 2200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 b) as to City: City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340 Attention: City Administrator G-4 ME230-800-859539.v4 With a copy to: David T. Anderson Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 or at such other address as either party may from time to time notify the other in writing in accordance with this paragraph. 9. This Agreement shall terminate (a) upon the final payment of all special assessments levied against the Property for the Tamarack Drive Improvements if the City determines within 10 years from the date of this Agreement that the Tamarack Drive Improvements are necessary; or (b) 10 years from the date of this Agreement if at that time the City has not made a determination that the Tamarack Drive Improvements are necessary. Upon termination, if requested the City agrees to execute and deliver such documents, in recordable form, as are necessary to extinguish its rights hereunder. 10. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed a waiver by the City of its right to make local improvements in accordance with Minn. Stat. Ch. 429 and assess the costs thereof against benefiting properties, including potentially the Property, subject to its adherence to all statutory requirements. Likewise, nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed a waiver by the Developer of any of the statutory rights afforded to it for special assessments levied against the Property that otherwise exceed the total amount specified in paragraph 3 of this Agreement. ************************** G-5 ME230-800-859539.v4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Petition and Waiver Agreement have caused these presents to be executed as of the day and year aforesaid. THE DEVELOPER: By: Chris Pederson Its: Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on ________________ 2023, by Chris Pederson, the Manager of Medina Ventures, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ____________________________________ Notary Public This instrument drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered 700 Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 G-6 ME230-800-859539.v4 CITY OF MEDINA By: __________________________________ Kathleen Martin, Mayor By: __________________________________ Scott T. Johnson, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2023, by Kathleen Martin, the acting mayor of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of __________, 2023, by Scott T. Johnson, the city administrator of the city of Medina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. ____________________________________ Notary Public G-B-1 ME230-800-859539.v4 EXHIBIT A TO PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT Legal Description Lots 1 through 4, Block 2, Meander Park and Boardwalk, Hennepin County, Minnesota. G-B-1 ME230-800-859539.v4 EXHIBIT B TO PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT Preliminary Plans [to be inserted] https://medinamn.sharepoint.com/Shared Documents/Planning/Wetlands/Wetland Applications/22-177 Meander Park and Boardwalk Replacement Plan/Draft NOD for Council/MEMO - WR-22-177 - Medina Mayor & CC - Meander Park and Boardwalk NOD - 040623.docx 54 0 G A T E W A Y B L V D | BU R N S V I L L E , M N | 55 3 3 7 | 95 2 . 7 3 7 . 4 6 6 0 | WS B E N G . C O M Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor Martin and Medina City Council Members From: Roxy Robertson, WSB Date: April 6, 2023 Re: Meander Park and Boardwalk Replacement Plan City Project No. WR-22-177 WSB Project No. 21340-000 The Meander Park and Boardwalk project proposes a commercial planned unit development (PUD) including a boardwalk/deck that follows the natural curves of the existing wetland, restaurant and retail spaces to the south, an event venue with basement storage to the west, a daycare and play areas in the northeast, and a parking lot in the central and eastern parts of the stie. Two water features would be constructed to enhance the aesthetics of the project site adjacent to the event venue. The four residential units would feature a garage, living space, and a deck/walkout. To develop the site as proposed, Meander Road would be improved to construct a westbound center left turn lane to the south site, a multi-use trail would be constructed along the north side of Meander Road from the east end of the project site to the proposed south site driveway, and a driveway would be constructed at the south site. Excavation impacts, approximately 2-feet deep in the wetland, would result from creation of compensatory floodplain storage. These impacts are not regulated by the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and are a No Loss. Wetland fill impacts occur along Meander Road from widening for the purposes of constructing a multi-use trail and a center left turn lane. These activities will result in 0.09 acres of wetland impacts. The applicant will mitigate for the impacts at a 2:1 ratio through the purchase of 0.18 acre of wetland from Bank No. 1722, located in Anoka County. The application was noticed to the WCA Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) on March 1, 2023. Comments were allowed until March 29, 2023. Members of the TEP (LGU, Hennepin Conservation District, BWSR) met on March 8, 2023 to discuss the replacement plan. Comments generally included discussions of how impacts were minimized through design alternatives. The TEP was in agreement with the proposed design and minimization measures. On behalf of the City of Medina, Local Government Unit for the Wetland Conservation Act, I recommend that the City Council approves the wetland replacement plan for the Meander Park and Boardwalk Project. A Notice of Decision is attached for review. BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 1 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit: City of Medina County: Hennepin Applicant Name: Medina Ventures, LLC Applicant Representative: SRF (Nicole Zappetillo) Project Name: Meander Park & Boardwalk Development LGU Project No. (if any): WR-22-177 (21340-000) Date Complete Application Received by LGU: 2/24/2023 Date of LGU Decision: 3/1/2023 Date this Notice was Sent: 4/18/2023 WCA Decision Type - check all that apply ☐ Wetland Boundary/Type ☐ Sequencing ☒ Replacement Plan ☐ Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ☒ No-Loss (8420.0415) ☐ Exemption (8420.0420) Part: ☒ A ☐ B ☐ C ☐ D ☐ E ☐ F ☐ G ☐ H Subpart: ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ 6 ☐ 7 ☐ 8 ☐ 9 Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) Total WCA Wetland Impact Area: 0.09 acres Wetland Replacement Type: ☐ Project Specific Credits: ☒ Bank Credits: 0.18 acres of credit Bank Account Number(s): 1722 Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations (attach if any) ☒ Approve ☐ Approve w/Conditions ☐ Deny ☐ No TEP Recommendation LGU Decision ☐ Approved with Conditions (specify below)1 ☒ Approved1 ☐ Denied List Conditions: Decision-Maker for this Application: ☐ Staff ☒ Governing Board/Council ☐ Other: Decision is valid for: ☒ 5 years (default) ☐ Other (specify): 1 Wetland Replacement Plan approval is not valid until BWSR confirms the withdrawal of any required wetland bank credits. For project- specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 and evidence that all required forms have been recorded on the title of the property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be valid. LGU Findings – Attach document(s) and/or insert narrative providing the basis for the LGU decision1. ☐ Attachment(s) (specify): ☒ Summary: The applicant proposes a commercial planned unit development (PUD) including a boardwalk/deck that follows the natural curves of the existing wetland, restaurant and retail spaces to the south, an event venue with basement storage to the west, a daycare and play areas in the northeast, and a parking lot in the central and eastern parts of the stie. The creation of floodplain compensatory storage will result in 0.035 acres of excavation in a Type 2 wetland. The construction of a multi-use trail and a center left turn lane on Meander Park Drive will result in 0.09 acres of permanent wetland fill. The applicant will mitigate for the impacts at a 2:1 ratio through the purchase of 0.18 acres of wetland from Bank No. 1722 located in Anoka County. Medina City Council approved the replacement plan at their April 18, 2023 meeting. 1 Findings must consider any TEP recommendations. BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 2 Attached Project Documents ☒ Site Location Map ☐ Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify): Appeals of LGU Decisions If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail. The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why the decision is in error. Send to: Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 travis.germundson@state.mn.us Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision? ☒ Yes1 ☐ No 1If yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process. Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, fees, etc. as applicable) Send petition and $500 to: City of Medina, 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN 55340 Notice Distribution (include name) Required on all notices: ☒ SWCD TEP Member: Stacey Lijewski ☒ BWSR TEP Member: Jed Chesnut ☒ LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): Dusty Finke ☒ DNR Representative: Wes Saunders-Pierce ☒ Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: Elm Creek Watershed District (Ross Mullen) ☒ Applicant: Chris Pederson, madmrchristopher@gmail.com ☒ Agent/Consultant: Nicole Zappetillo, nzappetillo@srfconsulting.com Optional or As Applicable: ☒ Corps of Engineers: usace_requests_mn@usace.army.mil ☐ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): ☐ Members of the Public (notice only): ☒ Other: Maria Rucke, maria.rucke@medinamn.gov; Eric Trelstad, eric@wetlandcreditagency.com Signature: Date: This notice and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255, Subp. 3. Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 4/11/2023 Minutes 1 Meander Park and Boardwalk – Medina Ventures – 1472 Highway 55 – Amendment to Planned Unit Development (PID 0211823330003) Finke stated that the City Council granted preliminary plat approval and general plan of development approval earlier this year. He stated that the applicant has been working on the final plans and after review of the survey information they found a discrepancy on the boundary of the property line, noting that the eastern property line actually lies one-foot further west. He explained that a lot of the improvements hug that eastern property line which would reduce the setbacks in that area by one foot. He stated that if the Commission and Council would not approve this, the previous approval would still be effective, but the site plan would need to be adjusted to shift everything one foot to the west. He stated that updated architectural information was provided for informational purposes. He noted that one comment was received related to the project in general rather than the request tonight and that comment was provided to the Commission. He stated that a notice was provided stating that the Planning Commission would accept feedback but noted that the Council will hold the public hearing. Nielsen asked if the north and south properties could be separated. Finke confirmed that could be done. Jacob asked for details on the initial survey process and why the results were different. Finke stated that a different company completed the first survey and the civil engineer relied on that work. He noted that more in-depth review is required in the next steps, which is where this was discovered. Rhem invited the applicant to speak. Chris Pederson, Medina Ventures/Applicant, stated that it was certainly not the intent to have to request this extra flexibility because of the surveying error. He noted that the property to the east is either vacant or contains a driveway and the one-foot difference would almost certainly be unnoticeable in reality. Re- drafting plans to accommodate the one-foot difference is a lot more effort and cost than it sounds and the primary effect would be to shrink landscaping areas within the parking lot and potentially redesign the home footprint. Nielsen stated that she has been in favor of this project from the beginning. She referenced the north property and suggested reducing the footprint of the buildings by one foot. Nielsen asked the anticipated square footage of the units. Pederson responded that the units were a total of 2950 square feet with a two-car garage. Finke stated that there is a driveway serving two rural properties, but those properties are guided for sewered development and therefore it would be appropriate to consider the ultimate use of that property. He noted that Fields of Medina is already developed with a setback between the properties. He commented that staff would not encourage a City street going in next to a private road and therefore it has not been anticipated that there would be a street east of the site, but there has been an identified opportunity for the Diamond Lake Regional Trail in that location. He stated that on the south, the property to the east is undeveloped and that property would most likely be sold at some time. Piper inquired if the HOA would prohibit parking in the driveways. Finke commented that it would not be uncommon for an HOA to prohibit parking in driveways, although an HOA is not guaranteed. He noted that the northern unit would not have adequate depth to park in the Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 4/11/2023 Minutes 2 driveway and therefore would have to park in the garage by default. He stated that the City has not encouraged a limitation on parking in driveways. Piper asked if the City has a say in HOA requirements. Finke commented only to the extent necessary to meet City requirements, such as stormwater management. Piper asked if vehicles could park in the shared driveway. Finke commented that the drive would be signed no parking as it provides access for emergency vehicles. Piper asked if there were other options for resident parking. Finke commented that there are parking spaces in the arch or the hammerhead that would be limited for guest parking and should not be used for residents. He stated that what is proposed does meet the City requirement of two parking spaces. Nielsen stated that she would support the PUD change on the southern property as it would not impact anything to the east and would rather not see the reduction on the northern property. She noted that she would rather see a reduction in the footprint of the home. Piper said that she was concerned with the lack of parking for the residential units. Jacob commented that he could support the change. Popp stated that the applicant addressed his questions and stated that this design attempts to preserve nature and preserve area to the extent possible. He stated that if the PUD were not going to move forward it would constrict the properties and could impact the buffer. He stated that he agrees with Jacob that he does not believe the expense is worth it and would support the amendment. Nielsen commented that she struggles as she does not believe this meets the criteria of a PUD. She stated that she loves the project idea and would prefer to have it on the southern portion and not the northern portion. Finke commented that you cannot push everything on the north side as the already approved PUD had limitations on the flexibility of the buffer, therefore the foot would have to be taken from the footprint of the home or the distance between the home and access road which would impact the length of the driveways. Rhem stated that he thinks the future land use for the northern property should be factored in when considering that setback. He stated that he supports the current footprint with the additional foot to adjust for the property line. Popp appreciated the input of Nielsen as that is a valid point. He stated that he would support the approval as presented. Motion by Rhem, seconded by Jacob, to recommend approval to allow the PUD without adjustment for accurate property line location. Motion carries 3 - 2 (Nielsen and Piper opposed). (Absent: Ahmed and Plec) 1 Dusty Finke From:Vinay Bhatia <vinbha@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, April 6, 2023 12:00 PM To:Dusty Finke Subject:Meander Park and Boardway Hi, I am wri ng to express my concerns to the proposed Meander Park and Boardwalk development project, specifically the four‐residence housing unit project planned for the area just behind my home at 4101 Cavanaugh Dr. As a long me resident of this neighborhood, I have always enjoyed the beau ful view from my home. However, I believe that this development project will have a nega ve impact on this view, as well as on the quality of life for myself and my neighbors. The proposed housing project will significantly reduce the open space and greenery in the area. Addi onally, the increased traffic and noise that will come with the new development will detract from the peaceful and quiet atmosphere that we have all come to appreciate and enjoy. Furthermore, I am concerned about the poten al impact on property values in the area. The proposed development could cause a decline in home values in the surrounding neighborhoods, including my own. Considering these concerns, I urge you to reconsider the proposed housing project and to explore alternative options that would preserve the natural beauty of the area while still meeting the needs of the community. I strongly believe that it is possible to balance the needs of development with the protection of the environment and the well‐being of residents. Thank you for considering my concerns to this proposed development project. I look forward to hearing from you regarding any updates or changes to the plans. Sincerely, Vinay Bhatia. 4101 Cavanaugh Dr Medina, MN 55340 R.T. DOC. NO. C.R. DOC. NO. KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That R & J Partnership of Medina LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota to wit: Parcel 1: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, excepting therefrom the East 196.73 feet thereof and the North 457.63 feet thereof; and Parcel 2: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23 except that part thereof lying South of the North 457.63 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and lying West of the East 196.73 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and except the East 60 feet thereof; (Registered Property) And Parcel 3: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 118, Range 23, lying North of the railroad right-of-way, excepting therefrom the East 60 feet thereof, in Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract Property) Except All that part of Parcels 1 and 3 which lie southwesterly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 118, Range 23; thence run northerly along the west line of said Southwest Quarter on an assumed bearing of North 0 degrees 04 minutes 04 seconds East for a distance of 379.45 feet (115.656 meters); thence South 34 degrees 59 minutes 05 seconds for 92.45 feet (28.180 meters) to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 69 degrees 59 minutes 37 seconds East for 1443.57 feet (440.000 meters) and said line there terminating. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as MEANDER PARK AND BOARDWALK and does hereby dedicate to the public for public use the public ways and easements for drainage and utility purposes as created by this plat. In witness whereof said R & J Partnership of Medina LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers this _______ day of _______________, 20____. Signed: R & J Partnership of Medina LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership ____________________________________________its ____________________________________________ (Signature)(Title) ____________________________________________ (Print Name) ____________________________________________its ____________________________________________ (Signature)(Title) ____________________________________________ (Print Name) STATE OF _________________ COUNTY OF _______________ This instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _______________, 20____ by ____________________, ____________________ of R & J Partnership of Medina LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership, on behalf of the partnership. ____________________________________________ (Signature) ____________________________________________ (Print Name) Notary Public, _______________ County, __________ My Commission Expires _______________________ STATE OF _________________ COUNTY OF _______________ This instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _______________, 20____ by ____________________, ____________________ of R & J Partnership of Medina LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership, on behalf of the partnership. ____________________________________________ (Signature) ____________________________________________ (Print Name) Notary Public, _______________ County, __________ My Commission Expires ________________________ I Michael J. Fischer, Jr. do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.1, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this _______ day of _______________, 20____. ____________________________________________ Michael J. Fischer, Jr., Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 56505 STATE OF _________________ COUNTY OF _______________ This instrument was acknowledged before me this _______ day of _______________, 20____ by Michael J. Fischer, Jr. ____________________________________________ (Signature) ____________________________________________ (Print Name) Notary Public, _______________ County, _________. My Commission Expires _______________________ CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA This plat of MEANDER PARK AND BOARDWALK was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this _______ day of _______________, 20____, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statues, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. City Council, City of Medina, Minnesota ____________________________________________ Mayor ____________________________________________ Administrator-Clerk RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20____ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this _______ day of _______________, 20____. Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor by ____________________________________________ Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to MN. STAT. Sec. 383B.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this _______ day of _______________, 20____. Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyor by____________________________________________ REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of MEANDER PARK AND BOARDWALK was filed in this office this _______ day of _______________, 20____, at ______ o'clock __.M. Amber Bougie, Registrar of Titles by ____________________________________________ Deputy COUNTY RECORDER, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of MEANDER PARK AND BOARDWALK was recorded in this office this_______ day of _______________, 20____, at ______ o'clock __.M. Amber Bougie, County Recorder by____________________________________________ Deputy MEANDER PARK AND BOARDWALK INSET "A" SHEET 1 OF 2 S8 9 ° 0 2 ' 3 7 " W 1 3 4 0 . 9 5 ' L= 1 6 . 1 2 ' R= 4 4 . 2 8 ' Δ= 2 0 ° 5 1 ' 5 3 " L=19.79' R= 44.28' Δ= 25°36'41" S0°10'09"W 705.38' N0°16'12"E 1328.02' MEANDER PARK AND BOARDWALK R.T. DOC. NO. C.R. DOC. NO. For purposes of this plat the South line of Sec. 2, T. 118, R. 23 is assumed to bear S 89°02'37" W.Denotes set as marked: DH = 3/8 Inch Drill Hole BR = 1 Inch Brass Monument Denotes found 1/2 inch Iron Pipe marked as noted SHEET 2 OF 2 GSOC GOPHER STATE ONE CALL (GSOC) STATE LAW REQUIRES CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT AND PROVIDE NOTICE TO THE NOTIFICATION CENTER BEFORE BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION. (REFER TO MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE CHAPTER 216D FOR DETAILS) E-TICKET:WWW.GSOCSUBMIT.ORG BY PHONE: EMERGENCY TICKETS:866-640-3637 TWIN CITIES METRO:651-454-0002 GREATER MN AREA:800-252-1166 NATIONALLY:811 DESCRIPTION TITLE SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLAN SITE PLAN SITE PLAN - MEANDER ROAD ALIGNMENT AND PROFILE SITE PLAN - TRUCK CIRCULATION PAVING PLAN GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN SWPPP PLAN UTILITY PLAN CIVIL DETAILS TREE PRESERVATION PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE DETAILS - BOARDWALK AND DECK SHEET NO. C0.0 C1.0 - C1.2 C2.0 - C2.2 C2.3 C2.4 C3.0 - C3.2 C4.0 - C4.4 C4.5-C4.6 C5.0 - C5.4 C6.0-C6.17 T1.0-T1.2 L1.0-L1.5 L2.0 L2.1-L2.2 SHEET INDEX MEANDER PARK & BOARDWALK DEVELOPMENT MEDINA, MN 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT LOCATION VICINITY MAP (NO SCALE) PROJECT LOCATION CONTACT NAME | PHONE NUMBER | EMAIL NOTE: DEVELOPER CHRIS PEDERSON - MANAGER MEDINA VENTURES, LLC 4130 FESCUE DRIVE MEDINA, MN 55340 PH: 608-217-6330 EMAIL: madmrchristopher@gmail.com CIVIL ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / SURVEYOR PAUL SCHROEDER - PROJECT MANAGER SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 PH: 763-249-6796 EMAIL: pschroeder@srfconsulting.com CONTACT NAME | PHONE NUMBER | EMAIL TITLE SHEET C0.0 BENCHMARK SW CORNER OF SEC 2, T118N, R23W N: 194782.799 E: 453467.220 ELEV: 995.55 HORIZONTAL DATUM: NAD83(2011) VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD88 SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 P. SCHROEDER 15295 N. SCHAUFENBUEL N. SCHAUFENBUEL P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25721 MICHAEL C. AARON 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL HIGHW A Y 5 5 MEANDER ROAD (1" =200') VICINITY AERIAL AR R O W H E A D D R I V E CA V A N A U G H D R I V E PROJECT SITE NORTH PROJECT SITE SOUTH MBMBMBMB TR E E * 7 8 TR E E * 6 TR E E * 5 TR E E * 4 TR E E * 3 TR E E * 2 TR E E * 1 TR E E * 2 8 TR E E * 2 9 TR E E * 3 0 TR E E * 3 2 TR E E * 3 1 TR E E * 3 3 TR E E * 7 7 TR E E * 7 6 TR E E * 7 4 TR E E * 7 3 TR E E * 7 5 TR E E * 8 TR E E * 9 TR E E * 1 0 TR E E * 1 1 TR E E * 1 4 TR E E * 1 3 TR E E * 1 2 TR E E * 1 7 TR E E * 1 6 TR E E * 1 5 TR E E * 1 9 TR E E * 1 8 TR E E * 2 0 TR E E * 2 1 TR E E * 2 2 TR E E * 2 3 TR E E * 2 4 TR E E * 2 5 TR E E * 2 6 TR E E * 2 7 TR E E * 3 4 TR E E * 3 5 TR E E * 3 6 TR E E * 3 7 TR E E * 3 8 TR E E * 3 9 TR E E * 4 0 TR E E * 4 1 TR E E * 4 2 TR E E * 4 3 TR E E * 4 4 TR E E * 4 5 TR E E * 4 7 TR E E * 4 6 TR E E * 4 9 TR E E * 4 8 TR E E * 5 0 TR E E * 5 1 TR E E * 5 2 TR E E * 5 3 TR E E * 5 4 TR E E * 5 5 TR E E * 5 6 TR E E * 6 3 TR E E * 6 4 TR E E * 6 5 TR E E * 6 6 TR E E * 6 7 TR E E * 6 8 TR E E * 6 9 TR E E * 7 0 TR E E * 7 1 TR E E * 7 2 TR E E * 6 2 TR E E * 6 1 TR E E * 6 0 TR E E * 5 9 TR E E * 5 8 TR E E * 5 7 >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> S W E L L PE D C VL T C C F O PE D C E EO H - E( U G ) E( U G ) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH) F/O(UG) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > >> >> G G F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) EX SAN MH RIM: 991.71 (RIM:991.42 PER PLAN) INV(N): 969.82 (PER PLAN) INV(S): 969.72 (PER PLAN) > EX SAN MH RIM: 1000.24 (RIM:1000.07 PER PLAN) INV(N): 971.37 (PER PLAN) INV(S): 971.27 (PER PLAN) EX SAN MH RIM: 1004.83 (RIM:1003.78 PER PLAN) INV(W): 973.28 (PER PLAN) INV(E): 981.38 (PER PLAN) INV(S): 972.98 (PER PLAN) S S S 8" PVC C900 SAN (PER PLAN)8" PVC C900 SAN (PER PLAN) 12 " P V C W A T ( P E R P L A N ) 10" PV C W A T (PER P L A N ) 12 " P V C W A T ( P E R P L A N ) 99 699 5 99 4 99 3 992 99199098 998 8 98 8 98 999 0 99 1 99 2 99 3 99 4 99 1 99 0 98 9 994 99 3 992 991 990 989 988 98 8 987 986 985 98 4 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 100 2 100 3 10 0 0 99 9 998 997 996 995 994 993 992 991 990 989 988 987 986 985 984 983 982 98 5 98 4 98 3 98 4 98 3 X X XXX X X X XX X XXX XXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XX X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX XX XXX XXX X X XX X N EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SITE REMOVALS NOTES 1.EXISTING PROPERTY AND CONDITIONS ARE BASED ON LOT SURVEY COMPLETED BY SKYSURV, DATED NOVEMBER 17, 2021, WHICH ALSO REFERENCES CERTAIN ITEMS, LIKE WETLAND DELINEATION, PROVIDED BY AREA M SHAPE FILE. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY DATA AND UPDATED PROPERTY LINES ARE PROVIDED BY SRF CONSULTING, SUMMER OF 2022 AND WINTER OF 2023. PROJECT BEARINGS ARE BASED ON HORIZONTAL DATUM NAD83(2011) AND VERTICAL DATUM NAV88. SRF PROJECT BENCHMARK IS LOCATED AT: SW CORNER OF SECTION 2, T118N, R23W, N: 194782.799, E: 453467.220, ELEVATION 995.550. 2.CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, AND NOTIFYING THE CIVIL ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. THIS INCLUDES, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, TOPOGRAPHY, ELEVATIONS, UTILITIES, VEGETATION, AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL UTILITY LOCATES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A TICKET FOR PUBLIC UTILITY LOCATES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY GRADING, EXCAVATION, OR UTILITY WORK THROUGH "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (GSOC) AT WWW.GSOCSUBMIT.ORG, OR CALLING 811, ALONG WITH ANY FOLLOW-UP TO MISSING INFORMATION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST HIRE A PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATING SERVICE TO LOCATE PRIVATE UTILITIES IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SITE STABILITY PRIOR TO EXECUTING ANY SITE REMOVALS AND IMPROVEMENTS. SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LIMITS OF REMOVALS WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND FIELD VERIFY CONDITION OF EXISTING APPURTENANCES TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING, REPAIRING, OR REPLACING MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (SUCH AS FENCES, SIGNS, IRRIGATION HEADS, ETC.) THAT MAY BE DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL. PROVIDE SAWCUT AT PAVEMENT EDGE REMOVAL. PROVIDE SMOOTH TRANSITION OF ANY REMOVAL OR IMPROVEMENTS AT DISTURBANCE EDGE. HAUL AND DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVAL ITEMS OFF-SITE. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMOLISH AND REMOVE ALL ITEMS ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLANS AND OTHER ITEMS, AS NECESSARY FOR THE PROJECT AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS. THIS INCLUDES ITEMS SUCH AS BUILDINGS, ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, PAVEMENTS, DEBRIS, VEGETATION, SUBSURFACE ITEMS (UTILITIES), UNDESIRED SOIL, AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS. VERIFY ALL SOIL CORRECTIONS WITH GEOTECH REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. HAUL AND DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVAL ITEMS OFF-SITE. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE, REPAIR AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING PRIVATE OR PUBLIC UTILITIES AS NECESSARY, WHETHER STATED ON THE PLANS OR NOT, INCLUDING ANY RELATED PERMITS AND FEES. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND RECEIVE APPROVAL FOR ACTIVITIES WITH OWNER AND UTILITY COMPANIES BEFORE STARTING WORK. 8.CLEAR, GRUB, AND REMOVE ALL TREES AND VEGETATION WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, OR AS NOTED. STRIP TOPSOIL, STOCKPILE, AND REDISTRIBUTE PER GRADING PLAN. 9.TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE DRIP LINE OF TREES TO REMAIN, OR AS ILLUSTRATED, WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. NO DETRIMENTAL CONDITIONS TO OCCUR AT TREE PRESERVATION AREAS, SUCH AS STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT/MATERIALS, CHEMICAL WASH, OR EXCAVATION. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL STAGING AND TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR THE PROJECT, AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER AND GOVERNING AGENCY. PROVIDE MINIMAL DISRUPTION TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND STREETS, OR AS DIRECTED BY PROPERTY OWNER. 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONDITIONS, SUCH AS CONSTRUCTION TRAILER, TEMPORARY FENCING, AND OTHER SECURITY MEASURES FOR THE LENGTH OF THE ENTIRE PROJECT. 12.ALL CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 13.FOR ANY SALVAGE AND/OR REINSTALL ITEMS, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL WORK RELATED TO RE-LOCATION (TEMP AND PERMANENT), STORAGE, AND PROTECTION. EXISTING CONDITIONS / REMOVALS PLAN OVERALL C1.0 SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 P. SCHROEDER 15295 N. SCHAUFENBUEL N. SCHAUFENBUEL P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25721 MICHAEL C. AARON 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL 21" CSP STM CULVERT 21" CSP STM CULVERT 21" CSP STM CULVERT 21" APRON INV: 981.30 21" APRON INV: 981.40 21" APRON INV: 981.81 21" APRON INV: 981.68 21" APRON INV: 981.75 21" APRON INV: 981.64 SEE SHEETS C1.1 AND C1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL REMOVALS EXISTING CONDITIONS / REMOVAL LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY TO REMAIN (GRAY/FADED LINEWORK, TYP.) ITEMS TO BE REMOVED (BLACK LINEWORK, TYP.) REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACE CLEAR AND GRUB (TREE) AREA CLEAR AND GRUB (TREE) TREE PROTECTION REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE X M E A N D E R R D FULL DEPTH SAWCUT (FULL WIDTH OF REMOVAL) FULL DEPTH SAWCUT (FULL WIDTH OF REMOVAL) HW Y 5 5 EXISTINGWETLAND LINE EXISTING WETLAND LINE CAVANAUGH DRIVE EXISTING GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVE RES UNIT 1 RES UNIT 3 DAY CARE 7,500 SF RES UNIT 2 RES UNIT 4 RESTAURANT 4,952 SF PLAY A R E A PL A Y A R E A PLAY AREA EVENT VENUE 15,577 SF PLUS 7,033 SF BASEMENT (STORAGE / DATA CENTER) PLUS 14 LODGING UNITS (2ND/3RD FLOORS) RETAIL 9,510 SF T TT T TR E E * 7 8 TR E E * 2 8 TR E E * 2 9 TR E E * 3 3 TR E E * 6 2 TR E E * 6 1 TR E E * 6 0 TR E E * 5 9 TR E E * 5 8 TR E E * 5 7 >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> N 1.SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVAL PLAN, ALONG WITH ANY RELATED SURVEYS FOR DETAILS ON PROPERTY BACKGROUND INFORMATION. 2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON BUILDINGS, MONUMENT SIGNS, TRASH ENCLOSURES, AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS. VERIFY WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS THE EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS/SERVICE, AND OTHER RELATED BUILDING ITEMS. 3.SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING LOCATIONS, DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS. 4.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF CONCRETE, OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5.ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 5.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6.ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE CONCRETE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS, AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS, OR AS APPROVED. 8.BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, OR AS NOTED. PAVEMENT AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO ADHERE TO ALL AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSIBILITY, INCLUDING SLOPE. CONTACT ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY INVOLVING ANY DISCREPANCIES. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING. 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL SITE GOVERNMENTAL PERMITS AND FEES. 12.SEE SHEET C2.2 FOR MEANDER ROAD TYPICAL SECTION. SITE NOTES 1.ALL TRAFFIC SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD), OR AS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2.PARKING LOT STRIPING SHALL BE 4" WIDE COLOR WHITE, TWO COATS OF PAINT. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ANY/ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS AS SHOWN IN WHITE (TWO COATS). 3.ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNS AND MARKINGS PER LATEST ADA CODE AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY IN EACH DESIGNATED ACCESSIBLE STALL IN BLUE BACKGROUND WITH WHITE BORDER (TWO COATS OF PAINT). CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT THE WORDS "NO PARKING" IN EACH ACCESSIBLE ISLE ADJACENT TO AN ACCESSIBLE SPACE IN WHITE LETTERS MINIMUM 12" IN HEIGHT. SIGNS TO BE LOCATED AT THE HEAD OF THE PARKING SPACE. SEE ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAILS. 4.ALL SIGNS SHALL INCLUDE MOUNTING HARDWARE, POST, CONCRETE FOOTING AND CASING WHERE REQUIRED. CONCRETE CASING REQUIRED IN LOCATIONS WHERE POST IS NOT PROTECTED BY CURB. 5.IF NOTED, ALL STOP SIGNS SHALL INCLUDE A 12" WIDE PAINTED STOP BAR IN WHITE PAINT (TWO COATS) PLACED AT THE STOP SIGN LOCATION, A MINIMUM OF 4' FROM CROSSWALK. ALL STOP BARS SHALL EXTEND FROM DIRECTIONAL TRANSITION BETWEEN LANES TO THE CURB. 6.ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED 18" BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SIGNAGE AND STRIPING NOTES SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY PROPERTY ADDRESS / PID:1472 STATE HIGHWAY 55 (PID 0211823330003) MEDINA, MN 55340 PROPERTY AREA:802,799 S.F. (18.429 AC), PER SURVEY BOUNDARY 442,152 S.F. (10.150 AC) = NORTH PARCEL 360,647 S.F. (8.279 AC) = SOUTH PARCEL DEVELOPABLE PROPERTY AREA:317,556 S.F. (7.290 AC) = 39.6% (EXCLUDING WETLAND)70,214 S.F. (1.612 AC) = 15.9% NORTH PARCEL 247,342 S.F. (5.678 AC) = 68.6% SOUTH PARCEL DEVELOPABLE PROPERTY AREA:317,556 S.F. (7.290 AC) = 39.6% (EXCLUDING WETLAND & WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER)52,322 S.F. (1.201 AC) = 11.8% NORTH PARCEL 204,459 S.F. (4.693 AC) = 56.69% SOUTH PARCEL PROPERTY OWNER:R & J PARTNERSHIP OF MEDINA PROPERTY DEVELOPER:MEDINA VENTURE, LLC EXISTING ZONING:RR-UR (RURAL RESIDENTIAL URBAN RESERVE) = NORTH CH (COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY) = SOUTH PROPOSED ZONING:PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) BOTH NORTH AND SOUTH GUIDED R2 = NORTH GUIDED CH = SOUTH BUILDING SUMMARY: NORTH RESIDENTIAL (BLOCK 1, LOT 1-4):4 UNITS (2 DUPLEX), 2 LEVELS PLUS WALK OUT BASEMENT (1,944 S.F. FOOTPRINT OF EACH UNIT) SOUTH EVENT VENUE (BLOCK 2, LOT 1):15,577 S.F. (FIRST LEVEL) PLUS 7,033 S.F. BASEMENT SOUTH EVENT VENUE (BLOCK 2, LOT 1):14 LODGING UNITS (2ND AND 3RD FLOORS) SOUTH DAY CARE (BLOCK 2, LOT 2):7,500 S.F. SOUTH RESTAURANT (BLOCK 2, LOT 3):4,952 S.F. SOUTH RETAIL (BLOCK 2, LOT 4):9,510 S.F. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) - REQUIRED:PER PUD FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) - PROVIDED:PER PUD BUILDING COVERAGE MAXIMUM:PER PUD BUILDING COVERAGE PROVIDED:5.6% (45,315 / 802,799) BUILDING SETBACKS:PER PUD PROJECT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - EXISTING:31,363 S.F., INCLUDING STREET / TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - PROPOSED:202,990 S.F., INCLUDING STREET / TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - INCREASE:171,627 S.F., INCLUDING STREET / TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS PARKING REQUIRED:PER PUD, SHARED PARKING PARKING PROVIDED:PER PUD, SHARED PARKING NORTH - RESIDENTIAL:10 SPACES (8 WITHIN GARAGES AND 2 VISTOR), EXCLUDING DRIVEWAY SOUTH - COMMERCIAL:229 SPACES (W/ 8 ACCESSIBLE) PARKING SIZE MIN. REQUIRED/PROVIDED:9' WIDE X 18' DEEP, 24' DRIVE AISLE (22' MIN.) PARKING SETBACK:PER PUD PARKING LANDSCAPE (COMMERCIAL ONLY):5,019 S.F. (5.67%) FOR 88,508 S.F. PERIMETER SITE PLAN OVERALL C2.0 SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 P. SCHROEDER 15295 N. SCHAUFENBUEL N. SCHAUFENBUEL P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25721 MICHAEL C. AARON 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE WETLAND CLASSIFICATION NORTH PARCEL PRESERVE SOUTH PARCEL MANAGE 2 UPLAND BUFFER ZONE AVERAGE WIDTH NORTH PARCEL 50 FEET (CITY ALLOWS 35 FEET) SOUTH PARCEL 25 FEET MINIMUM UPLAND BUFFER ZONE MINIMUM WIDTH NORTH PARCEL 30 FEET (CITY MAY ALLOW LESS) SOUTH PARCEL 20 FEET BUFFER SETBACK (PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE) NORTH PARCEL 15 FEET SOUTH PARCEL 15 FEET BUFFER SETBACK (ACCESSORY STRUCTURE) NORTH PARCEL 5 FEET SOUTH PARCEL 5 FEET WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER AREA 60,744 SF - EXISTING NORTH EXISTING 27,485 SF (35 FOOT AVERAGE) SOUTH EXISTING 33,259 SF (25 FOOT AVERAGE) WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER AREA 60,775 SF - PROPOSED (CROSS HATCHED AREA) NORTH PROPOSED 17,892 SF (20,295 SF SHOWN) SOUTH PROPOSED 42,883 SF PUD FLEXIBILITY NORTH PARCEL MINIMUM UPLAND BUFFER ZONE WIDTH (17 FEET MINIMUM AT DEVELOPMENT) NORTH PARCEL AREA REDUCTION WITH MITIGATION ON SOUTH PARCEL SOUTH PARCEL MINIMUM UPLAND BUFFER ZONE WIDTH (2 FEET MINIMUM AT LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE) WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15') WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER DELINEATED WETLAND LINE WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15') DELINEATED WETLAND LINE BLOCK 2 BLOCK 1 OUTLOT LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 229 TOTAL PARKING SPACES (INCLUDING 8 ADA) 10 TOTAL PARKING SPACES (INCLUDING 2 PER GARAGE AND 2 VISITOR) ELEVATED BOARDWALK ELEVATED BOARDWALK UPPER LEVEL DECK, LOWER LEVEL WALKOUT (TYP.) WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND MEANDER ROAD PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS - URBAN SECTION WITH CURB - WEST BOUND LEFT TURN LANE - LANE CENTER LINE RADIUS TO ACCOMMODATE 40 MPH SPEED (667' MIN.) - CITY TRAIL CROSSING 10' CITY BITUMINOUS TRAIL WITH 5' BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY WITH DEDICATED OUTBOUND LEFT AND RIGHT LANES RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY EXISTING FARMSTEAD RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY SITE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT SETBACK LINE (PER CODE) EXISTING CONDITIONS TRUNCATED DOMES EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY RESTORATION CURB AND GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER (TIP-OUT) ORNAMENTAL FENCE PARKING LOT POLE LIGHT RETAINING WALL PARKING SPACES PER ROW WETLAND DELINEATION LINE WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER & WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER SETBACK PUD FLEXIBILITY AT DEVELOPMENT, MIN. 25' AT GENERAL AREAS AND 17' AT RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH SPLIT RAIL FENCE AT BACKYARD PERIMETER (TYP.) WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER SETBACK PUD FLEXIBILITY AT LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE, MIN. 2' (TYP.) WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER DELINEATED WETLAND LINE WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER SUMMARY WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL 1 10-20-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE 2 11-04-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS FUTURE FREESTANDING DEVELOPMENT SIGN AREA LOT 1 BLOCK 1 LOT 2 BLOCK 1 LOT 3 BLOCK 1 LOT 4 BLOCK 1 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B ROW DEDICATION TOTAL 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 41,955 SF 378,289 SF 3,908 SF 442,152 SF 0.103 ACRES 0.103 ACRES 0.103 ACRES 0.103 ACRES 0.96 ACRES 8.68 ACRES 0.090 ACRES 10.150 ACRES PROPOSED PLAT NAME: MEANDER PROPOSED PARCEL INFO: PROPOSED PROPERTY MEANDER - PLAT SUMMARY - NORTH LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA ACRES LOT 1 BLOCK 2 LOT 2 BLOCK 2 LOT 3 BLOCK 2 LOT 4 BLOCK 2 OUTLOT C ROW DEDICATION TOTAL 116,613 SF 29,585 SF 36,655 SF 40,830 SF 134,013 SF 2,678 SF 360,374 SF 2.677 ACRES 0.679 ACRES 0.841 ACRES 0.938 ACRES 3.077 ACRES 0.061 ACRES 8.273 ACRES MEANDER - PLAT SUMMARY - SOUTH LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA ACRES WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL SETBACK (MIN.15') M E A N D E R R D HW Y 5 5 CAVANAUGH DRIVE EXISTING GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE RES UNIT 1 RES UNIT 3 DAY CARE 7,500 SF RES UNIT 2 RES UNIT 4 RESTAURANT 4,952 SF PLAY A R E A PL A Y A R E A PLAY AREA EVENT VENUE 15,577 SF PLUS 7,033 SF BASEMENT (STORAGE / DATA CENTER) PLUS 14 LODGING UNITS (2ND/3RD FLOORS) RETAIL 9,510 SF T TT T TR E E * 7 8 TR E E * 2 8 TR E E * 2 9 TR E E * 3 3 TR E E * 6 2 TR E E * 6 1 TR E E * 6 0 TR E E * 5 9 TR E E * 5 8 TR E E * 5 7 >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> S PE D C VL T C C F O PE D C E EO H - E( U G ) E( U G ) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH) F/O(UG) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > >> >> G G F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) S S S 12 " P V C W A T ( P E R P L A N ) 10" PV C W A T (PER P L A N ) 12 " P V C W A T ( P E R P L A N ) 99 699 5 99 4 99 3 992 99199098998 8 98 8 98 999 0 99 1 99 2 99 3 99 4 99 1 99 0 98 9 994 99 3 992 991 990 989 988 988 987 986 985 98 4 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 100 2 100 3 10 0 0 99 9 998 997 996 995 994 993 992 991 990 989 988 987 986 985 984 983 982 98 5 98 4 98 3 98 4 98 3 99 699 5 99 4 99 3 992 99199098998 8 98 8 98 999 0 99 1 99 2 99 3 99 4 99 1 99 0 98 9 994 99 3 992 991 990 989 988 988 987 986 985 98 4 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 100 2 100 3 10 0 0 99 9 998 997 996 995 994 993 992 991 990 989 988 987 986 985 984 983 982 98 5 98 4 98 3 98 4 98 3 995 996 99 7 99 8 99 9 99 4 99 599 499 399 299 199 0 995 994 993 992991990 996997998 1000 998999 98 5 98 698 798 8 98 999 099 199 2 99 5 995 990 990 986987988 985 984 990 992 994 996 998 1000 988 986 98 5 987 990992993992 99199 0 990 997 998 999 999999999999999999999 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 999999999 9999 999 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 PIV PIV PIV PIV N 1.THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-2, ENTITLED “STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA.” 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 3.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL WORK AND MATERIALS FOR GRADING, SUBSOIL CORRECTIONS (IMPORT/EXPORT), RETAINING WALLS, TOPSOIL, EROSION CONTROL AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS. 4.SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 6.ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. STRIP, STOCKPILE, AND REDISTRIBUTE EXISTING TOPSOIL, AS SUITABLE. 7.FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT WALL GRADE TRANSITION, AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 8.STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 9.DUST SHALL BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 10.ALL SLOPES 1:3 (V:H) OR GREATER REQUIRED TO RECEIVE SURFACE EROSION CONTROL WHETHER IT IS INDICATED ON THE PLAN OR NOT: MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES. 11.ALL STORM DRAINS AND INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED UNTIL ALL SOURCES OF POTENTIAL DISCHARGE ARE STABILIZED. 12.TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL AND CAN NOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS OR STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SILT, CLAY, OR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ARE EXEMPT EX: CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCK PILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES. 13.FINAL STABILIZATION REQUIRES THAT ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND THAT DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH 70% OF THE EXPECTED FINAL DENSITY, AND THAT ALL PERMANENT PAVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. ALL TEMPORARY BMP'S SHALL BE REMOVED, DITCHES STABILIZED, AND SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PERMANENT CONVEYANCES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS IN ORDER TO RETURN THE POND/BASIN TO DESIGN CAPACITY. 14.THE WATERSHED DISTRICT OR THE CITY MAY HAVE REQUIREMENTS FOR INSPECTIONS VERIFYING PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF THE BEST MANAGMENT PRACTICES (BMP) - THE MORE RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY. 15.SEE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NOTES AND DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL PERMITS/FEES, INSPECTORS, INSPECTIONS, AND DOCUMENTATION. PLAN REPRESENTS MINIMAL EROSION CONTROL, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MEANS AND METHODS FOR THE PROJECT AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE. 16.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL SUBGRADE SOIL CORRECTIONS, INCLUDING REMOVAL OF SUBGRADE DEBRIS, FOR PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS BUILDING, PAVEMENT, UTILITY, RETAINING WALLS, AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS. REFER TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ANY ADDITIONAL SITE PREPARATION INFORMATION OR REQUIREMENTS. 17.IF GROUND WATER IS PRESENT IN THE EXCAVATION, OR IF THE EXPOSED SOILS ARE WET AND UNSTABLE, CONTACT THE OWNER OR ENGINEER FOR A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 18.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO COMMENCING GRADING ACTIVITIES AND SHALL MAINTAIN SAID MEASURES FOR DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND DISPOSE OF OFF SITE. 19.CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT DIRT AND/OR DEBRIS FROM ENTERING STORM SEWER OR BEING TRANSPORTED OFF SITE IN AN UNCONTROLLED MANOR. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AT PROJECT CLOSEOUT THAT STORM SEWER SYSTEM IS CLEAR OF SEDIMENT AND/OR DEBRIS AND IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL. 20.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL MONITORING, PER REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION, TO INSPECT AND DOCUMENT ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY (EVERY 7 DAYS) AND AFTER EVERY 0.5 INCH RAINFALL EVENT, PER REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CORRECTIVE MEASURES IMMEDIATELY FOR ANY NON-COMPLIANCE OBSERVATIONS. 21.ALL DISTURBED NON-PAVED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE TEMPORARY PROTECTION OR PERMANENT COVER WITHIN 14 DAYS OF DISTURBANCE OPERATIONS. 22.WHEN TRAPPED SEDIMENT REACHES 1/3 OF THE HEIGHT OF SILT FENCE, IT SHALL BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR. 23.CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT FILTER SACKS SHALL BE CLEANED WHEN SEDIMENT REACHES 1/3 THE CAPACITY OF THE SACK. 24.WHEN SEDIMENT IS TRACKED ON TO PAVED SURFACES, IT SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. 25.ANY SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE THAT ACCUMULATES ON OR OFF THE OWNER'S PROPERTY SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS/HER EXPENSE. ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURS FROM THE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT OR FROM THE CONTRACTOR'S REMOVAL OF THE SEDIMENT, SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS/HER EXPENSE. 26.ALL EXCAVATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF OSHA 29 CFR, PART 1926, SUBPART P, “EXCAVATIONS AND TRENCHES.” THIS DOCUMENT STATES THAT EXCAVATION SAFETY IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 27.THE CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT SPECIFIC STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN. TEMPORARY STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UNTIL THE PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS ARE ESTABLISHED. CONTRACTOR TO DESIGN AND SUBMIT ALL TEMPORARY STORMWATER ITEMS FOR ENGINEER APPROVAL. 28.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL SURVEY CONSTRUCTION STAKING. 29.SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TYPE AND PLACEMENT LOCATION. 30.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 70 FOR POND EMERGENCY OVERFLOWS. 20.COORDINATE STORMWATER REUSE WITH IRRIGATION SYSTEM. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN BUILD BY IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION CONTROL PLAN OVERALL C4.0 SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 15295 N. SCHAUFENBUEL N. SCHAUFENBUEL P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25721 MICHAEL C. AARON 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL WETLAND DELINEATION LINE WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MINIMUM 15') WETLAND DELINEATION LINE WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MINIMUM 15') FLOODPLAIN FILL VOLUME 210 CY COMPENSATORY FLOODPLAIN FILL VOLUME PROVIDED 230 CY TOTAL WETLAND IMPACT AREA 5,415 SF (TEMP=1,504 SF, PERM= 3,911 SF) FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION 986.0 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL LEGEND PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED CONTOURS (MAJOR) PROPOSED CONTOURS (MINOR) EXISTING CONTOURS (MAJOR) EXISTING CONTOURS (MINOR) PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION FLOW LINE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE TC = TOP OF CURB D = DECK/BOARDWALK FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION HP/LP = HIGH/LOW POINT ± = MATCH EXISTING, FIELD VERIFY BW/TW = FINISHED GRADE AT LOW/HIGH SIDE OF WALL (DOES NOT INCLUDE BURIED WALL OR CAP) SI = STORM INLET RIM EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PROPOSED SURFACE SLOPE SILT FENCE BIO ROLL INLET PROTECTION ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE RIP-RAP STORM SEWER (SEE UTILITY PLAN) DRAIN TILE (SEE UTILITY PLAN) RETAINING WALL TIP-OUT GUTTER LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FLOODPLAIN FILL AREA FLOODPLAIN COMPENSATORY STORAGE WETLAND IMPACT AREA 9 9 9 9NORTHERN WETLAND IMPACT AREA 3,016 SF (3,016 SF PERMANENT) SOUTHERN WETLAND IMPACT AREA 2,399 SF (1,504 SF TEMPORARY, 895 SF PERMANENT) ELEVATED BOARDWALK ELEVATED DECK MINIMUM EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES SILT FENCE 2,385 LF BIO ROLL 2,627 LF INLET PROTECTION 18 EA RIP-RAP 56 CY ROLLED EROSION PREV. 52 SY PRODUCT CAT. 70 M E A N D E R R D HW Y 5 5 CAVANAUGH DRIVE EXISTING GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE TR E E * 7 8 TR E E * 2 8 TR E E * 2 9 TR E E * 3 3 TR E E * 6 2 TR E E * 6 1 TR E E * 6 0 TR E E * 5 9 TR E E * 5 8 TR E E * 5 7 >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> RES UNIT 1 RES UNIT 3 DAY CARE 7,500 SF RES UNIT 2 RES UNIT 4 RESTAURANT 4,952 SF PLAY A R E A PL A Y A R E A PLAY AREA EVENT VENUE 15,577 SF PLUS 7,033 SF BASEMENT (STORAGE / DATA CENTER) PLUS 14 LODGING UNITS (2ND/3RD FLOORS) RETAIL 9,510 SF T TT T S PE D C VL T C C F O PE D C E EO H - E( U G ) E( U G ) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH) F/O(UG) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > >> >> G G F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) EX SAN MH RIM: 991.71 (RIM:991.42 PER PLAN) INV(N): 969.82 (PER PLAN) INV(S): 969.72 (PER PLAN) > EX SAN MH RIM: 1000.24 (RIM:1000.07 PER PLAN) INV(N): 971.37 (PER PLAN) INV(S): 971.27 (PER PLAN) EX SAN MH RIM: 1004.83 (RIM:1003.78 PER PLAN) INV(W): 973.28 (PER PLAN) INV(E): 981.38 (PER PLAN) INV(S): 972.98 (PER PLAN) S S S 8" PVC C900 SAN (PER PLAN)8" PVC C900 SAN (PER PLAN) 12 " P V C W A T ( P E R P L A N ) 10" PV C W A T (PER P L A N ) 12 " P V C W A T ( P E R P L A N ) PIV PIV PIV PIV N UTILITY NOTES UTILITY PLAN OVERALL C5.0 UTILITY LEGEND PROPERTY LINE STORM SEWER DRAIN TILE SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN ELECTRIC (BURIED) ELECTRIC (OVERHEAD) TELEPHONE (BURIED) TELEPHONE (OVERHEAD) TELEVISION (BURIED) TELEVISION (OVERHEAD) FIBER OPTIC (BURIED) FIBER OPTIC (OVERHEAD) COMMUNICATION (UNDEFINED) NATURAL GAS LINE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS STORM MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN STORM FLARED END SECTION CLEAN OUT (CO) SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE 1.THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-2, ENTITLED “STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA.” 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL UTILITY LOCATES. CONTACT GOPHER SATE ONE CALL PER STATE STATUTES FOR PUBLIC UTILITY LOCATES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST HIRE A PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATING SERVICE TO LOCATE PRIVATE UTILITIES IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 3.SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR SURVEY INFORMATION. THE ENGINEER CAN NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR INACCURACIES RELATED TO THE SURVEY INFORMATION. 4.COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY MATERIALS, INSTALLATION, AND TESTING. 5.OBTAIN ALL PERMITS OR APPROVALS FROM LOCAL UTILITY OWNERS PRIOR TO BEGINNING UTILITY INSTALLATIONS. NOTIFY UTILITY OWNERS OF THE START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PROJECT AND ANY SPECIFIC UTILITY WORK AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE. 6.FIELD VERIFY AND COORDINATE ALL BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTIONS AND PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING LOCATION, TYPE, SIZE, AND INVERT ELEVATION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES FROM THE PLAN FOR RESOLUTION PRIOR TO BEGINNING UTILITY INSTALLATIONS. 7.ADJUST, OR ARRANGE TO BE ADJUSTED BY UTILITY OWNER, ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED. COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET IN PAVED AREAS TO MEET OWNER'S REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 8.SERVICE UTILITIES, SUCH AS ELECTRIC (TRANSFORMER), GAS, TELEPHONE, CABLE, FIBER OPTIC, AND OTHER RELATED SMALL UTILITIES, MAY BE SHOWN FOR GENERAL REFERENCE AND ARE DEEMED CONCEPTUAL LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING AND COORDINATING ALL LOCATIONS OF SERVICE UTILITY CONNECTIONS AND RELATED ITEMS WITH SERVICE PROVIDERS. 9.WATERMAIN AND WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO BE C900 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC), UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. MAINTAIN 7.5' OF COVER ON ALL NEW WATERMAIN, PROVIDE WATERMAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS AT CHANGE OF DIRECTION, AND PROVIDE 18" SEPARATION BETWEEN SEWER PIPE. ADJUST WATERMAIN VERTICALLY, AS NECESSARY, AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. IF INSULATION IS REQUIRED, PROVIDE DOW STYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, AT 4-INCH THICKNESS. RESIDENTIAL WATER SERVICE TO BE 1" HIGH DENSITY POLY ETHYLENE (HDPE). COMMERCIAL WATER SERVICE (DOMESTIC AND FIRE) TO BE SCHEDULE 40 POLY VINYL CHLORIDE, SIZE AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. 10.WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY ENGINEER'S ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARDS OR THE CITY'S WATERMAIN INSTALLATION STANDARDS. WHERE CONFLICTS OCCUR, THE MORE RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENT SHALL GOVERN. 11.SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR35 OR 26. SDR 26 REQUIRED FOR DEPTHS GREATER THAN 15 FEET. 12.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP), WITH R-4 GASKETS. RCP CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18" OR SMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" AND LARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC) TO BE SCHEDULE 40. IF ALLOWED BY THE CITY, HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE) SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2648. PIPE SHALL BE WATER TIGHT ACCORDING TO ASTM D3212 REQUIREMENTS. FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL BE RCP WITH TRASH GUARDS AND ROCK RIP-RAP. 13.OUTSIDE OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, INLET AND OUTLET CONNECTIONS TO SEWER STRUCTURES SHALL USE APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. 14.ALL MANHOLE COVERS TO BE STAMPED EITHER SANITARY OR STORM SEWER. 15.PIPE LENGTHS THAT MAY BE SHOWN ARE HORIZONTALLY FROM CENTER OF STRUCTURE TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE. 16.SITE UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5 FEET FROM BUILDING, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 17.ALL EXCAVATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF OSHA 29 CFR, PART 1926, SUBPART P, “EXCAVATIONS AND TRENCHES.” THIS DOCUMENT STATES THAT EXCAVATION SAFETY IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 18.DRAINTILE LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AS ILLUSTRATED. FIELD VERIFY FINAL LOCATIONS. 19.AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS-BUILT RECORD OF UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE AS-BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST-CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED. 20.COORDINATE STORMWATER REUSE WITH IRRIGATION SYSTEM. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN BUILD BY IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 P. SCHROEDER 15295 N. SCHAUFENBUEL N. SCHAUFENBUEL P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25721 MICHAEL C. AARON 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL CITY OF MEDINA GENERAL UTILITY NOTES A.THE CITY SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH VARIATIONS IN THE UTILITY AS-BUILT ELEVATIONS. ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. B.THE CITY, OR AGENTS OF THE CITY, ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ERRORS AND OMISSIONS ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS. THE OWNER AND ENGINEER OF RECORD ARE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MEET THE CITY'S STANDARDS. C.ALL WATERMAIN AND SANITARY SEWER TESTING SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. COPIES OF ALL TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY (PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, CITY ENGINEER), THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. D.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 7.5'. E.TRACER WIRE INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION STANDARDS. SEE THESE STANDARDS FOR FURTHER DETAILS. F.THE CITY WILL REQUIRE TELEVISING FOR SANITARY SEWER PIPE INSTALLATIONS PRIOR TO ACCEPTING A WARRANTY FOR THE UTILITY SYSTEM; PROVIDE REPORT AND VIDEO FILES TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. M E A N D E R R D HW Y 5 5 CAVANAUGH DRIVE EXISTING GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE TR E E * 7 8 TR E E * 2 8 TR E E * 2 9 TR E E * 3 3 TR E E * 6 2 TR E E * 6 1 TR E E * 6 0 TR E E * 5 9 TR E E * 5 8 TR E E * 5 7 >> RES UNIT 1 RES UNIT 3 DAY CARE 7,500 SF RES UNIT 2 RES UNIT 4 RESTAURANT 4,952 SF PLAY A R E A PL A Y A R E A PLAY AREA EVENT VENUE 15,577 SF PLUS 7,033 SF BASEMENT (STORAGE / DATA CENTER) PLUS 14 LODGING UNITS (2ND/3RD FLOORS) RETAIL 9,510 SF T TT T S G G L G L - PE D C TF O B + TF O B TF O B TF O B TF O B - UN P / W A T E R V A L V E M A R K E R VL T C C F O PE D C E EO H - E( U G ) E( U G ) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH) F/O(UG) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > >> >> G G F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) S S S PIV PIV PIV PIV FD C FDC FDC HIG H W A Y 5 5 CAVANAUGH DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE M E A N D E R R O A D PRIVATE DRIVE EX.GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVE CONIFEROUS TREES COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA`BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6` HT.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 7 DECIDUOUS TREES COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY ACER RUBRUM `NORTHWOOD`NORTHWOOD MAPLE 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 5 ACER X FREEMANII 'ARMSTRONG'ARMSTRONG FREEMAN MAPLE 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 8 ACER X FREEMANII 'JEFFERSRED'AUTUMN BLAZE® FREEMAN MAPLE 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 10 BETULA NIGRA `CULLY` TM HERITAGE RIVER BIRCH 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 6 CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS COMMON HACKBERRY 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 7 GINKGO BILOBA `AUTUMN GOLD` TM AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 3 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS `HARVE`NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUST 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 3 QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAK 2.5" CAL.CONT.SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 7 QUERCUS X MACDANIELLI `CLEMONS` TM HERITAGE OAK 2.5" CAL.CONT.SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 3 SALIX ALBA `TRISTIS`GOLDEN WEEPING WILLOW 1.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 10 ULMUS DAVIDIANA JAPONICA `DISCOVERY`DISCOVERY ELM 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 17 ORNAMENTAL TREE COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY MALUS X `SPRING SNOW`SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE 2" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 12 MALUS X 'PINK SPIRES'PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE 2" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 13 SHRUBS COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY CORNUS STOLONIFERA `FARROW`ARCTIC FIRE RED TWIG DOGWOOD #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.27 COTONEASTER LUCIDUS HEDGE COTONEASTER #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.39 JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS 'MINT JULEP'MINT JULEP JUNIPER #5 CONT.PLANT 5` O.C.15 RIBES ALPINUM ALPINE CURRANT #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.64 SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 'ANTHONY WATERER'ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.86 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'HOLMSTRUP'HOLMSTRUP ARBORVITAE #5 CONT.PLANT 5` O.C.7 PERENNIALS AND GRASSES COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT.PLANT 3` O.C.287 HEMEROCALLIS X `STELLA SUPREME`STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY #1 CONT.PLANT 18" O.C.517 NEPETA X `WALKER`S LOW`WALKER`S LOW CATMINT #1 CONT.PLANT 24" O.C.117 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM`GOLDSTRUM BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT.PLANT 18" O.C.118 SALVIA X SYLVESTRIS `MAY NIGHT`MAY NIGHT SAGE #1 CONT.PLANT 18" O.C.112 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT.PLANT 24" O.C.85 N LANDSCAPE NOTES LANDSCAPE PLAN - OVERALL L1.0 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 15295 J. FILLMORE J. FILLMORE P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25820 PAUL D. SCHROEDER 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL LANDSCAPE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE SHRUBS/PERENNIALS SOD MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST (MNDOT SEED MIX 35-641) WITH WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST (MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261) WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES WETLAND BUFFER EXISTING TREE/SHRUBS TO REMAIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LANDSCAPE EDGER LIMITS OF IRRIGATION (NOT SHOWN) 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL 2.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SOIL CONDITIONS. 3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4.COORDINATE ALL LANDSCAPE WORK WITH APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL. 5.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHlTECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 7.ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: -ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. -ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. -ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFlNG. -CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 8.PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 9.PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 10.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 11.PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 12.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON B&B MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 13.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 14.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 15.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 16.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 17.TOPSOIL (AND PLANTING SOIL) TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW), AND TO BE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS (LARGER THAN ONE INCH), SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS, UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. UTILIZE EXISTING ON-SITE TOPSOIL AS APPROPRIATE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL (PLANTING SOIL) FOR TREE, SHRUBS. AND PERENNIALS. 18.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, LANDSCAPE BED, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS, OR AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE A MINIMUM 4-INCH DEPTH, RED COLORED (OR AS DIRECTED), AND FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE A MINIMUM 3-INCH DEPTH, BUFF LIMESTONE (OR AS DIRECTED), AND 1.5-INCH TO 3-INCH DIAMETER. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WlTH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 19.EDGING TO BE PROVIDED BETWEEN MULCH AND LAWN TURF AREAS, OR AS INDICATED. STEEL EDGING BETWEEN LANDSCAPE BEDS AND LAWN TURF AREAS TO BE COMMERCIAL BLACK STEEL EDGING, INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION GUIDELINES. BLACK STEEL EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH CONNECTORS AND METAL STAKES NO GREATER THAN 4-FOOT ON CENTER AND ELEVATION BELOW LAWN MOWER CUT LINE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. INDIVIDUAL TREE AND SHRUB AREAS TO BE SPADED EDGE BETWEEN MULCH AND LAWN TURF GRASS AREAS WITH V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION. 20.All DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND/OR HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. SEED MIX AND APPLICATION RATE AS SPECIFIED PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS, OR AS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR RESEED ANY DAMAGED OR UNESTABLISHED AREAS UNTIL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE AND COMPLETION OF WARRANTY. 21.PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ON SlTE, OR AS COORDINATED. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PLANS, CALCULATIONS, AND SHOP DRAWINGS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. COORDINATE ALL IRRIGATION PIPES, WIRING, SLEEVING, AND OTHER COMPONENTS WITH OTHER PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS. 22.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 23.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND PLANT SCHEDULE TR E E * 2 8 TR E E * 2 9 TR E E * 3 3 TR E E * 6 2 TR E E * 6 1 TR E E * 6 0 TR E E * 5 9 TR E E * 5 8 TR E E * 5 7 >> >> DAY CARE 7,500 SF RESTAURANT 4,952 SF PLAY A R E A PL A Y A R E A PLAY AREA EVENT VENUE 15,577 SF PLUS 7,033 SF BASEMENT (STORAGE / DATA CENTER) PLUS 14 LODGING UNITS (2ND/3RD FLOORS) RETAIL 9,510 SF T TT T S G G L G L - PE D C TF O B + TF O B TF O B TF O B TF O B - UN P / W A T E R V A L V E M A R K E R E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH) E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)F/O(UG)F/O(UG) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > > G G G G F/O(U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) S S PIV PIV PIV PIV FD C FDC FDC (7) BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (3) HERITAGE OAK (3) AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO (3) COMMON HACKBERRY (4) COMMON HACKBERRY (4) SWAMP WHITE OAK (3) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE (3) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE (3) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE (3) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE (3) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE (3) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE (4) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE (3) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE (10) AUTUMN BLAZE® FREEMAN MAPLE (8) DISCOVERY ELM (9) DISCOVERY ELM (3) NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUST (2) GOLDEN WEEPING WILLOW (8) GOLDEN WEEPING WILLOW (8) ARMSTRONG FREEMAN MAPLE HIG H W A Y 5 5 M E A N D E R R O A D PRIVATE DRIVE N LANDSCAPE PLAN - SOUTH L1.1 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 15295 J. FILLMORE J. FILLMORE P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25820 PAUL D. SCHROEDER 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL LANDSCAPE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE SHRUBS/PERENNIALS SOD MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST (MNDOT SEED MIX 35-641) WITH WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST (MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261) WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES WETLAND BUFFER EXISTING TREE/SHRUBS TO REMAIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LANDSCAPE EDGER LIMITS OF IRRIGATION (NOT SHOWN) SOUTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE SUMMARY MINIMUM NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS REQUIRED ·SOUTH PARCEL LOT PERIMETER = 2,435 ·1 SHADE TREE PER 50 LF LOT PERIMETER = 49 REQUIRED ·1 ORNAMENTAL TREE PER 100 LF LOT PERIMETER = 25 REQUIRED ·1 SHRUB PER 30 LF LOT PERIMETER = 82 REQUIRED PROPOSED NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS ·EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED AND CREDITED TOWARD THE MINIMUM REQUIRED TREES ON A SITE = 8 ·PROPOSED SHADE TREE = 62 ·PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE = 25 ·TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED TREES = EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED + PROPOSED TREES = 98 TREES ·PROPOSED SHRUBS = 174 ·PROPOSED PERENNIALS = 1,045 WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND ALL EXISTING VEGETATION DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN THE WETLAND BUFFER TO BE RESTORED WITH MESIC PRAIRIE SEED MIX APPROXIMATE IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONTROLS AND WATER SUPPLY (REUSE ROOF WATER CISTERN AND SUPPLEMENTAL WELL) OVERHEAD UTILITIES STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST SEED MIX WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SOD SYNTHETIC TURF ARCHITECTURAL PATIO AREA TREES TO BE PLANTED 10' MINIMUM FROM BACK OF CURB WELL NOTE SEE SHEET L1.3, L1.4, AND L1.5 FOR SHRUB AND PERENNIAL BED PLANTING LAYOUT TR E E * 7 8 RES UNIT 1 RES UNIT 3 DAY CARE 7,500 SF RES UNIT 2 RES UNIT 4 PLAY A R E A PL A Y A R E A PLAY AREA T G G L G L - TF O B + TF O B TF O B TF O B TF O B - UN P / W A T E R V A L V E M A R K E R EO H - E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH)E(OH) E(O H ) F/O(UG)F/O(UG) > >>>>> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > G G G G S (7) BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (3) HERITAGE RIVER BIRCH (3) SWAMP WHITE OAK (3) NORTHWOOD MAPLE (1) NORTHWOOD MAPLE (3) COMMON HACKBERRY (4) COMMON HACKBERRY (1) NORTHWOOD MAPLE (3) HERITAGE RIVER BIRCH (3) NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUST (8) ARMSTRONG FREEMAN MAPLE PRIVATE DRIVE M E A N D E R R O A D PRIVATE DRIVE EX.GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVE NORTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE SUMMARY MINIMUM NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS REQUIRED ·4 TREES PER UNIT (16 TOTAL) ·0.2 OPACITY BUFFER YARD TO EAST AND WEST ·NO SHRUBS OR PERENNIALS REQUIRED PROPOSED NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS ·EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED AND CREDITED TOWARD THE MINIMUM REQUIRED TREES ON A SITE = 1 ·SHADE TREE/EVERGREEN TREES = 24 ·TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED TREES = EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED + PROPOSED TREES = 25 TREES ·PROPOSED SHRUBS = 64 ·PROPOSED PERENNIALS = 191 PROPOSED EAST BUFFER YARD CALCULATION ·BUFFER YARD WIDTH = 5' ·BUFFER YARD LENGTH = 225' ·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER 100 LF = 84 ·BUFFER YARD POINTS REQUIRED = 225100 = 2.25*84 = 189 ·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER 'TALL DECIDUOUS SHRUB' = 5 ·TOTAL NUMBER OF BUFFER YARD POINTS = 113*5 = 565 PROPOSED WEST BUFFER YARD CALCULATION ·BUFFER YARD WIDTH = VARIES, ASSUME 15' ·BUFFER YARD LENGTH = 240' ·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER 100 LF = 198 ·BUFFER YARD POINTS REQUIRED = 240100 = 2.40*198 = 476 ·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER '2.5" CAL OVERSTORY TREE' = 50 ·TOTAL NUMBER OF BUFFER YARD POINTS = 10*50 = 500 N LANDSCAPE PLAN - NORTH L1.2 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 15295 J. FILLMORE J. FILLMORE P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25820 PAUL D. SCHROEDER 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL LANDSCAPE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE SHRUBS/PERENNIALS SOD MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST (MNDOT SEED MIX 35-641) WITH WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST (MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261) WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES WETLAND BUFFER EXISTING TREE/SHRUBS TO REMAIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LANDSCAPE EDGER LIMITS OF IRRIGATION (NOT SHOWN) EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIESPROPERTY LINE STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST SEED MIX WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ALL EXISTING VEGETATION DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN THE WETLAND BUFFER TO BE RESTORED WITH MESIC PRAIRIE SEED MIX SEE SHEET L1.4 FOR SHRUB AND PERENNIAL BED PLANTING LAYOUT WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND SOD SEE SHEET L1.4 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TREES TO BE PLANTED 10' MINIMUM FROM BACK OF CURB 2' WIDE SOD STRIP, TYP.NOTE SEE SHEET L1.4 FOR SHRUB AND PERENNIAL BED PLANTING LAYOUT ALL EXISTING VEGETATION DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES OUTSIDE WETLAND BUFFER TO BE RESTORED WITH SOD. SPLIT RAIL FENCE. SOD EDGE 1' OFF FENCE. RETAIL 9,600 SF RESTAURANT 5,000 SF DAYCARE 7,500 SF LEVEL 1&2 LODGING 9,100 SF MAIN LEVEL VENUE 14,400 BASEMENT 6,800 SF 231 TOT A L P A R K I N G S P A C E S PR I V A T E D R I V E RES UNIT 4 2900 SF RES UNIT 3 2900 SF RES UNIT 2 2900 SF RES UNIT 1 2900 SF WATE R F E A T U R E BO A R D W A L K BOAR D W A L K BOARDWALK PLAZA GROTTO POND MEANDER ROAD DE C K PLAY AREA WET L A N D D E L I N I A T I O N HWY 55 CO U R T Y A R D NOTE: REFER TO CIVIL FOR SITE PLAN. LANDSCAPE FEATURE \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1" 40'-0" A000 SIT E P L A N 04 / 0 3 / 2 3 Co n c e p t 1" 40'-0"1 SITE PLAN No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e 1 Re v i s i o n 1 Da t e 1 UP BASEMENT TRASH ELEVATOR LOADING DOCK EARTH EARTH \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A100 VE N U E B A S E M E N T F L O O R P L A N 04 / 0 3 / 2 3 Co n c e p t 1/8" 1'-0"1 VENUE BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e BASEMENT ROOM SCHEDULE Name Area BASEMENT 6,495 SF ELEVATOR 120 SF BATHROOM 89 SF BATHROOM 89 SF 6,794 SF NOTE: REFER TO CIVIL FOR SITE PLAN. DN UP CONSERVATORY BALLROOM SUITE LOUNGE SUITE RETAIL TRASH OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW BOARDWALK PLAZA BOARDWALK LOUNGE PLAZA GROTTO BOARDWALK MAIN ENTRY PLAZA DROP OFF COURTYARD MENS ELEVATOR WOMENS MENS WOMENS KITCHEN HALL COATS ELEV LOBBY HALL RECEPTION ENTRY STAIR STAIR ENTRY RECEPTION HALL COATS \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A101 VE N U E M A I N L E V E L F L O O R P L A N 04 / 0 3 / 2 3 Co n c e p t 1/8" 1'-0"1 VENUE MAIN LEVEL PLAN No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e MAIN LEVEL ROOM SCHEDULE Name Area BALLROOM 4,635 SF CONSERVATORY 3,383 SF KITCHEN 1,122 SF LOUNGE 1,033 SF HALL 516 SF SUITE 344 SF ENTRY 340 SF SUITE 317 SF HALL 300 SF ENTRY 264 SF MENS 243 SF WOMENS 243 SF ELEV LOBBY 230 SF STAIR 197 SF STAIR 196 SF MENS 168 SF COATS 164 SF WOMENS 155 SF COATS 122 SF ELEVATOR 120 SF RECEPTION 118 SF HALL 115 SF RECEPTION 91 SF 14,417 SF NOTE: REFER TO CIVIL FOR SITE PLAN. DN UP DN UP DN DNDN ROOM 4 ROOM 8 ROOM 9 ROOM 3 ROOM 2 ROOM 1 ROOM 5 ROOM 7 ROOM 6 HALLWAY STAIR ELEVATOR STAIR SUITE 1 SUITE 2 ROOM 4 ELEVATOR HALL ROOM 3 STAIR STAIR ROOM 5 ROOF BALCONY BALCONY \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A102 LO D G I N G L E V E L 1 & 2 F L O O R P L A N S 04 / 0 3 / 2 3 Co n c e p t No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e 1/8" 1'-0"1 LODGING LEVEL 1 1/8" 1'-0"2 LODING LEVEL2 LEVEL 1 ROOM SCHEDULE Name Area ELEVATOR 120 SF HALLWAY 427 SF ROOM 1 427 SF ROOM 2 479 SF ROOM 3 497 SF ROOM 4 497 SF ROOM 5 785 SF ROOM 6 626 SF ROOM 7 349 SF ROOM 8 336 SF ROOM 9 753 SF STAIR 195 SF STAIR 197 SF 5,687 SF LEVEL 2 ROOM SCHEDULE Name Area SUITE 1 917 SF SUITE 2 947 SF ROOM 3 581 SF ROOM 4 304 SF ROOM 5 353 SF HALL 426 SF ELEVATOR 120 SF STAIR 197 SF STAIR 194 SF 4,038 SF RETAIL 3,380 SF RETAIL 2,870 SF RETAIL 4,760 SF RESTAURANT TRASH TRASH PLAZA DROP OFF RETAIL \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A103 CO M M E R C I A L F L O O R P L A N S 04 / 0 3 / 2 3 Co n c e p t 1/8" 1'-0"1 RETAIL FLOOR PLAN No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e NOTE: REFER TO CIVIL FOR SITE PLAN. DN DN UP UP DN UP UP GARAGE KITCHEN BED BATH BED ENTRYDININGHALL DECK CLOSET HALLWAY ROOF TERRACE DECK BELOW MASTER BATH BATH BED CLOSET CLOSET BED LIVING CLOSET BATH PATIO EARTH \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/4" 1'-0" A104 DU P L E X F L O O R P L A N S 12 / 2 2 / 2 2 ME D I N A T O W N H O M E S 1/4" 1'-0"2 MAIN LEVEL 1/4" 1'-0"3 UPPER LEVEL 1/4" 1'-0"1 BASEMENT BASEMENT CLOSET 50 SF BASEMENT BATH 52 SF BASEMENT BED 143 SF BASEMENT LIVING 527 SF 772 SF MAIN LEVEL CLOSET 38 SF MAIN LEVEL HALL 66 SF MAIN LEVEL BATH 78 SF MAIN LEVEL ENTRY 94 SF MAIN LEVEL KITCHEN 124 SF MAIN LEVEL BED 153 SF MAIN LEVEL BED 244 SF MAIN LEVEL DINING 358 SF 1,156 SF ROOM SCHEDULE Level Name Area UPPER LEVEL CLOSET 42 SF UPPER LEVEL BATH 69 SF UPPER LEVEL HALLWAY 74 SF UPPER LEVEL CLOSET 88 SF UPPER LEVEL BATH 149 SF UPPER LEVEL BED 242 SF UPPER LEVEL MASTER 348 SF 1,013 SF No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e GROUND0' - 0" LEVEL 2 24' - 6" BASEMENT -9' - 0" ROOF 36' - 6" LEVEL 113' - 0" VERT. GAP WD. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. BRICK TILE MTL. PLANTERS MTL. GROUND0' - 0" LEVEL 224' - 6" BASEMENT-9' - 0" ROOF36' - 6" LEVEL 1 13' - 0" PLANTERS MTL. MTL. BRICK TILE GROUND 0' - 0" LEVEL 2 24' - 6" ROOF36' - 6" LEVEL 113' - 0" TILE BRICK TILE MTL. STONE MTL. VERT. GAP WD. VERT BOARD FORMED CONC. GROUND0' - 0" LEVEL 224' - 6" BASEMENT-9' - 0" ROOF36' - 6" LEVEL 1 13' - 0" VERT. GAP WD. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. VERT BOARD FORMED CONC.PLANTERS BRICK TILE MTL. \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A200 VE N U E E L E V A T I O N S 04 / 0 3 / 2 3 Co n c e p t WEST SOUTH EAST NORTH No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e 1/8" 1'-0" ROOF14' - 0" 2' - 0 " 2' - 0 " ROOF17' - 0" 7' - 0 " CONC.VERT. WD. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. CORTEN STL.HORIZ. WD.VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. CORTEN STL. HORIZ. WD.METAL 2' - 0 " ROOF17' - 0" 2' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 7' - 0 " ROOF14' - 0" HORIZ. WD. CORTEN STL. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC.HORIZ. WD. CORTEN STL. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. VERT. WD.CONC. METAL ROOF27' - 0" STONE HORIZ. WD. METAL ROOF27' - 0" 7' - 0 " VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. HORZ. WD. STONE. METAL ROOF HORZ. WD. CONC. CONC. VERT. WD. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC.MTL. 2' - 0 " CORTEN STL. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC.MTL. STONE HORIZ. WD. METAL \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A201 RE T A I L E L E V A T I O N S 04 / 0 3 / 2 3 Co n c e p t RESTAURANT SOUTH RETAIL NORTH DAYCARE SOUTH DAYCARE EAST No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e 1/8" 1'-0" (NORTH IS SAME BUT MIRRORED) RETAIL SOUTH RESTAURANT NORTH RETAIL WEST RETAIL EAST RESTAURANT WEST RESTAURANT EAST DAYCARE WEST MAIN LEVEL10' - 0" UPPER LEVEL21' - 6" ROOF31' - 6" VERT. GAP WD. HORIZ. WD.HORIZ. WD. MAIN LEVEL10' - 0" UPPER LEVEL 21' - 6" ROOF31' - 6" VERT. GAP WD. MTL. VERT. GAP WD. \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/4" 1'-0" A202 DU P L E X E L E V A T I O N S 01 / 3 1 / 2 3 ME D I N A T O W N H O M E S No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e EAST WESTSOUTH GROUND0' - 0" LEVEL 224' - 6" BASEMENT-9' - 0" ROOF36' - 6" LEVEL 1 13' - 0" VERT. GAP WD. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. BRICK TILE MTL. MTL. GROUND 0' - 0" LEVEL 2 24' - 6" BASEMENT-9' - 0" ROOF36' - 6" LEVEL 113' - 0" MTL. MTL. BRICK TILE GROUND0' - 0" LEVEL 2 24' - 6" ROOF 36' - 6" LEVEL 113' - 0" TILE BRICK TILE MTL. STONE MTL. VERT. GAP WD. GROUND 0' - 0" LEVEL 224' - 6" BASEMENT-9' - 0" ROOF36' - 6" LEVEL 113' - 0" VERT. GAP WD. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. BRICK TILE MTL. \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A203 VE N U E E L E V A T I O N S W I T H O U T RA I L I N G & S C R E E N I N G 04 / 0 3 / 2 3 Co n c e p t No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e WEST SOUTH EAST NORTH MAIN LEVEL 0' - 0" SOFFIT 20' - 0" T.O. ROOF 32' - 0" \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/4" 1'-0" A204 DU P L E X E L E V A T I O N S H I P - R O O F 03 / 2 8 / 2 3 Pr o j e c t S t a t u s No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e EAST Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 April 18, 2023 City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: April 13, 2023 MEETING: April 18, 2023 City Council SUBJECT: Planning Department Updates Land Use Application Review A) Cates Industrial Park – Comprehensive Plan Amendment– Oppidan has submitted preliminary plat and site plan review for a 310,000 square foot warehouse/office development east of Willow Drive, north of Chippewa Road. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the March 14 meeting and recommended approval. The applicant is updating plans to address some of the conditions, and requested that the City delay review until the plans are updated. Staff intends to present at the April 18 meeting. B) Meander Park and Boardwalk – Meander Rd, east of Arrowhead Dr – Medina Ventures had requested PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat approval for a development to include four residential units north of Meander Rd, and commercial uses south of Meander Rd including a venue, restaurant, daycare, and speculative retail space. The City Council granted PUD general plan and preliminary plat approval on January 17. The applicant has now requested final plat approval. City Council review is scheduled for the April 18 meeting. C) 3844 Linden Dr E. – Highlands PUD Amendment – Joe McCusker has requested an amendment of the design standards of the Medina Highlands PUD to allow a deck to extend off the side of his twinhome unit. The amendment would apply only to this lot. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at the April 11 meeting and recommended approval. Staff intends to present to the City Council on May 2. D) Loram/Scannell Medina Industrial – Loram and Scannell have submitted materials for the City to prepare an EAW for a warehouse/industrial development east of Arrowhead Drive, south of Highway 55, to the south of Loram’s existing facility. The council granted approval of the preliminary plat and site plan review at the February 7 meeting. Staff is awaiting final plans and plat updates, and will present when complete, potentially at the May 2 meeting. E) 1225 Maplewood Concept Plan – John and Lisa James have requested review of a concept plan for a three-lot subdivision. Staff is conducting preliminary review and will schedule for a public hearing when complete, potentially at the May 8 Planning Commission meeting. F) 562/552 Hwy 55 lot rearrangement – Tom and Margaret Dykhoff have requested a lot line rearrangement between two adjacent parcels. The Council granted resolution of approval at the April 4 meeting. Staff will coordinate with applicant to record necessary documents. G) BAPS Site Plan Review – 1400 Hamel Road – BAPS Minneapolis Medina has requested an amendment to their approved site plan review. The applicant has submitted updated architectural information based on the City’s updated regulations pertaining to architectural elements. The applicant has also proposed minor adjustments to the site layout previously approved. The Council reviewed at the November 9 meeting and recommended approval. The Council approved the amended Site Plan Review at the December 6 meeting. The applicant has indicated that they intend to start construction during the spring of 2023. H) 500 Hamel Road Apartment Concept Plan – Medina Apartments LLC has requested review of a concept plan review for development of a 97-unit apartment building at 500 Hamel Rd. The MEMORANDUM Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 April 18, 2023 City Council Meeting Planning Commission held a public hearing at their August 10 meeting and Council provided comments on August 16. The developer met with neighbors on September 12 and the parties have indicated that they will meet again to discuss the project. I) Pioneer Highlands Final Plat – Onyx Investments has requested final plat approval of a four-lot rural subdivision located south of Pioneer, east of Willow Drive. Council adopted a resolution of approval on March 7. Staff will work with applicant on conditions of approval to prepare for recording and construction. J) Hamel Townhomes Final Plat – 342 Hamel Rd – Hamel Townhomes, LLC has requested final plat approval for a 30-unit townhome development. The Council granted final plat approval on August 16. Staff will work with the applicant to finalize documents prior to beginning of construction. K) Ditter Heating and Cooling Site Plan Review – 820 Tower Drive – Ditter Heating and Cooling has requested a Site Plan Review for an approximately 5,000 square foot addition to its building. The application is incomplete for review and will be scheduled for a hearing when complete. L) Pioneer Trail Preserve – This project has been preliminarily approved and the City is awaiting final plat application. Other Projects A) Bamboo Early Childhood – the applicant has requested Administrative Site Plan Review approval to convert existing home at 562 Highway 55 into a daycare facility. The property is zoned Commercial-Highway and review is underway. B) Peg’s Countryside Café Addition – Rene Calle has requested Administrative Site Plan Review for an addition to the rear of Peg’s Countryside Café. Materials are currently incomplete and staff is awaiting updated information to review. C) Hackamore Road – staff continues to work with Xcel Energy to find a cost effective way to relocate the services for the two homes they serve. Staff also continues discussion related to the final easement acquisition. D) Safety Training – staff took part in all-staff safety training during the morning of 4/6. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Jason Nelson, Director of Public Safety DATE: April 13, 2023 RE: Department Updates On April 11-14, I attended the Minnesota Chiefs of Police Conference in Duluth. The common theme is leadership and how do we recruit and retain. There are many strategies that agencies are trying. The retention piece is as important, if not more important, as the recruitment because of the amount of time and cost to the organization when losing employees with years of experience. These are things that our agency is currently making a priority to work on. In looking to the future, with the lack of police candidates in the profession, there will be agencies that will have to consolidate. This is something that is already happening outstate. As little as 5-7 years ago this thought would have never been an option as local governments would not want to give up local control, but now is a reality in many communities. Job openings have been posted on the city website and others professional websites. On the Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training website there are 134 listings for police and community service officer openings. Community Service Officer Jacob Milinkovich has advised me that he has received a conditional officer from the Shakopee Police Department. He indicated that he anticipated leaving some time in June. Milinkovich is currently enrolled in law enforcement skills and has yet to take his peace office license test. Patrol: The following are updates of Patrol Officers between March 29, 2023 and April 11, 2023: Citations – 28 Warnings – 69 PD Accidents – 3 PI Accidents – 0 Medicals – 4 Falls – 8 Suspicious Calls – 6 Traffic Complaints – 0 Other Agency Assists – 5 Business/Residential Alarms - 10 Fire Alarms -7 Welfare Checks - 2 On 03/28/2023 officer was dispatched to a welfare check in the 100 block of Medina Street North in Loretto. Person wanted assistance with getting into in-patient treatment for addiction. Upon arrival the officer found the person was already on the phone with a case worker. Subject agreed to go to the hospital to sober up and the case worker advised she would follow up with assistance in getting into treatment. On 03/29/2023 officer was dispatched to 1800 block of Buckskin Drive to take a theft report. Victim reported checks being stolen from outgoing mail and the checks were attempted to be cashed in St. Paul. Officer learned the check cashing was denied and the victim was not currently out any money. The case was forwarded to Investigations. On 03/29/2023 officers were called to a damage to property at the Medina Inn. Management reported a male had backed his pickup into the building and was now slumped over in the driver’s seat. Upon arrival officers made contact with the subject who appeared very intoxicated. He was administered standard field sobriety tests and ultimately arrested for DWI. A loaded handgun was found in the vehicle in a side pocket on the center console. The subject later refused to submit to a test and was transported to Hennepin County Jail. Medina Inn sustained significant damage from the vehicle. The vehicle was found to have current insurance. On 03/31/2023 a resident called reporting his front license plate was found missing from his vehicle and believed it was stolen. Officer took the report and was later checking in-house records and found a report from Three Rivers PD that they had contact with a vehicle that was displaying tabs from the plate that was reported missing. Incident forwarded to Investigations. On 03/31/2023 officers responded to numerous vehicles in the ditch and trees down due to the heavy snow that fell (hopefully the last snow of the season). On 04/03/2023 at 1814 hours officers were dispatched to a personal injury accident near the intersection of County Road 24 and Iroquois Drive. Upon arrival officers found a badly damaged Lexus SUV with a female trapped inside. The vehicle had been eastbound on County Road 24 when it left the roadway and struck a utility pole before rolling. Hamel Fire Department assisted with extrication of the driver, and she was transported to the hospital with serious injuries. Officers found an open bottle of alcohol in the vehicle and believed the female to be under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crash. A search warrant was obtained to collect a blood sample from the driver which will be sent to the BCA for analysis. Any charges are pending the results. On 04/05/2023 at 1245 hours officers were dispatched to a suspicious person in the driveway of a residence in the 1200 block of Oakview Road. Upon arrival officers were able to make contact with the individual who said he had been dropped off earlier and had been walking for several hours trying to get back to his group home in New Hope. The subject was found to have a warrant for his arrest and taken into custody. He was transported to Hennepin County Jail. On 04/05/2023 officer was dispatched to a theft report at Caseys. The subject had come into the store and wanted to purchase a carton of cigarettes and attempted to use a known fraudulent digital coupon. When the clerk turned around to get management, the subject took the carton of cigarettes off the counter and walked out the front door. The subject has been involved in additional thefts in the same manner. The case was forwarded to Investigations. On 04/08/2023 officer was dispatched to a disturbance in the area of Medina Street and the railroad tracks. Resident reported a train had been sitting on the tracks idling for some time and was revving its engine and making a lot of noise. Resident believed the engineer was doing this purposely. The officer spoke with the resident by phone and advised he had no control over the trains and that trains often sit in that area to allow other opposing trains to pass. The officer checked the area and noted no unusual amount of noise. On 04/08/2023 at 1835 hours officers were dispatched to a welfare check in the 100 block of Chippewa Road. Sister reported she had been unable to reach her brother who lives at the address, which was unusual. Officers checked the exterior of the residence which was found secure. After obtaining additional information officers forced entry and found the male deceased in bed. Officers contacted Hennepin County Crime Lab and the Hennepin County Medical Examiner who responded. Officers took custody of a dog that was in the home. Investigations: Received a report of an assault, victim provided statement. Suspect interview pending. Received a theft report regarding the use of stolen checks. The deposits were not approved but were attempted. Investigation on-going. Received a report of a theft of a carton of cigarettes. The suspect also stole from the same gas station in two other cities as well. Investigation on-going. Received an adult protection report regarding an individual at a long-term care facility. Investigation on-going. There are currently 8 cases assigned to investigations. 1 TO: Medina Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: April 12, 2023 MEETING: April 18, 2023 SUBJECT: Public Works Update STREETS • Spring road restrictions are still in effect. Warm weather will help firm things up. Developers and contractors alike are very anxious to get to work after this long winter. • Bid responses for the Hackamore Road street project will be opened soon. Staff is working to gather easements for widening the road and some possible utilities. • Hot asphalt was only available in St Paul last week. Staff found it necessary to make the drive last week so the worst of the potholes could be patched. • We expect to begin street improvement projects shortly after weight restrictions are lifted. Staff is putting together the necessary permits, traffic control and general drainage items. I held a pre-con meeting on Thursday to ensure we’re all on the same page. WATER/SEWER/STORMWATER • Staff will be working with our sub-contractor to perform sewer cleaning services in Foxberry, Medina Morningside and on County Road 19. • The media replacement project is moving along at a good pace. Filter #1 is back online. Filter #2 will be ready for water and the new media next week. We are back on schedule and will be ready for the spring irrigation season. • Medina’s annual consumer confidence drinking water report has been completed and is available on our website. A link to the report will be included in the next newsletter and utility bill. The information is mandated by the Department of Health. PARKS/TRAILS • The amended HAC grounds and concession contracts for the 2023 baseball season are in your packet for approval. • Public Works Foreman Derek Reinking will be evaluating the trail system to identify any maintenance or replacement needs. • Spring cleanup in the parks will take place once things dry up. • Staff will meet with the Copper Creek development (across from Hamel Legion Park) next week to discuss ballgame parking concerns. • Scoreboard installation on Paul Fortin Field will begin after road restrictions are lifted. The existing scoreboard will be donated to the Loretto softball organization. MEMORANDUM 2 MISC • We are once again expecting a great turnout for Clean-up day on Saturday, April 29th based on the number of inquiries received. Lisa is finalizing the details and is still looking for volunteers. Please let us know if you’re interested! • Lisa was contacted and then interviewed by an 8th grade student last week who reached out to discuss local environmental issues so he could complete an assignment at Benilde St.-Margarets. • Lisa is also working with a student from Wayzata who is leading a community-based service project that will earn him a Distinguished Conservation Service Award in the National Honor Society. The project will include education outreach and the installation of storm drain markers in the Foxberry Farms neighborhood. • Not only do the above-mentioned projects allow the City to continue building great relationships with the community, but they also satisfy MS4 permit outreach requirements. ORDER CHECKS APRIL 4, 2023 – APRIL 18, 2023 054199 ALL AMERICAN TITLE CO., INC ................................................ $125.08 054200 BATHLA, MADHAVI .................................................................... $500.00 054201 BERRY, STACEY ........................................................................ $100.00 054202 BONNER, JEFFREY ................................................................... $131.52 054203 DARAPALLI, RAJESH ................................................................. $500.00 054204 EISENREICH, KATHERINE/SARAH ............................................. $43.56 054205 JOHNSTON, KEVIN/ANNE ......................................................... $143.97 054206 KHATRI, MUNEER ...................................................................... $250.00 054207 SWANSON, THOMAS/AMY ........................................................ $132.53 054208 ASPEN MILLS INC ........................................................................ $95.66 054209 BEAUDRY OIL & PROPANE ................................................... $2,398.70 054210 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN ................................... $41,526.46 054211 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC ...................................................... $226.01 054212 COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA INC .................................... $8,390.92 054213 CONTEMPORARY IMAGES .................................................... $3,043.06 054214 CROW RIVER NEWS ................................................................... $71.55 054215 ECM PUBLISHERS INC ........................................................... $1,159.73 054216 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL ........................................................ $41.85 054217 GRAINGER.................................................................................. $113.00 054218 HAMEL LUMBER INC ................................................................. $132.97 054219 HAMEL LIONS CLUB .................................................................. $675.00 054220 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER ............................................. $52.50 054221 MATTHEW E HUNZ .................................................................... $308.88 054222 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC ............................................................... $65.00 054223 KELLY'S WRECKER SERVICE INC ........................................... $335.00 054224 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR ................................................... $607.50 054225 CITY OF LONG LAKE ............................................................ $11,150.25 054226 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN ........................................................... $1,171.56 054227 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC ........................................................... $47.18 054228 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL .................................................. $36,562.86 054229 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ........................................... $17,583.48 054230 MN DEPT OF LABOR/INDUSTRY ........................................... $2,549.55 054231 MOTLEY AUTO SERVICE LLC .................................................. $135.00 054232 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC ........................................................ $453.68 054233 NELSON ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR ...................................... $680.00 054234 OAK RIDGE PET BOARDING ................................................. $1,200.00 054235 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTION LLC ................................................. $65.17 054236 CITY OF ORONO ..................................................................... $1,514.95 054237 PREMIUM WATERS INC .............................................................. $49.49 054238 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP ..................................................... $187.73 054239 SOLUTION BUILDERS INC ..................................................... $5,279.40 054240 STANLEY STEEMER .................................................................. $362.00 054241 STREICHER'S ............................................................................. $186.97 054242 STRYKER SALES, LLC ................................................................ $90.48 054243 TACTICAL SOLUTIONS ............................................................. $419.00 054244 TALLEN & BAERTSCHI ........................................................... $5,413.21 054245 TEGRETE CORP .......................................................................... $63.00 054246 TIMESAVER OFFSITE ................................................................ $356.50 054247 TITAN MACHINERY .................................................................... $279.91 054248 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY ............................................... $266.23 054249 WSB & ASSOCIATES ............................................................ $71,804.75 Total Checks $219,042.80 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS APRIL 4, 2023 – APRIL 18, 2023 006789E PR PERA ................................................................................ $21,174.88 006790E PR FED/FICA ......................................................................... $20,890.54 006791E PR MN Deferred Comp ............................................................ $3,357.00 006792E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA .................................................... $4,669.98 006793E CITY OF MEDINA ......................................................................... $24.00 006794E FURTHER................................................................................. $2,927.39 006795E MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT .............................................. $724.20 006796E CENTURYLINK ........................................................................... $271.25 006797E CIPHER LABORATORIES INC. ............................................... $1,122.00 006798E CULLIGAN-METRO .................................................................... $122.70 006799E VOID ................................................................................................ $0.00 SOFTWARE ISSUE 006800E FP MAILING SOL POSTAGE BY PHON ................................. $1,000.00 006801E FRONTIER .................................................................................... $57.52 006802E FURTHER.................................................................................... $340.64 006803E MARCO (LEASE) ..................................................................... $1,097.19 006804E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC .......................................................... $1,055.95 006805E PAYMENT SERVICE NETWORK INC ..................................... $1,611.25 006806E THE VALVOLINE COMPANY 68 ................................................ $232.05 006807E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL .......................................... $12.00 Total Electronic Checks $60,690.54 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT APRIL 12, 2023 0512635 MILINKOVICH, JACOB ............................................................... $782.84 0512636 WIESE, TANNER L ..................................................................... $808.74 0512637 ALBERS, TODD M. ..................................................................... $230.87 0512638 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L. .................................................... $1,171.02 0512639 BARNHART, ERIN A. ............................................................... $2,882.60 0512640 BOECKER, KEVIN D. ............................................................... $2,909.71 0512641 CAVANAUGH, JOSEPH ............................................................. $230.87 0512642 CONVERSE, KEITH A. ............................................................ $2,202.43 0512643 DEMARS, LISA ........................................................................ $1,714.86 0512644 DESLAURIERS, DEAN ............................................................... $230.87 0512645 DION, DEBRA A. ...................................................................... $2,198.97 0512646 ENDE, JOSEPH ....................................................................... $2,121.37 0512647 FINKE, DUSTIN D. ................................................................... $3,122.31 0512648 GLEASON, JOHN M................................................................. $2,722.77 0512649 GREGORY, THOMAS .............................................................. $2,202.17 0512650 HALL, DAVID M. ....................................................................... $2,247.08 0512651 HANSON, JUSTIN .................................................................... $2,910.86 0512652 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. .............................................................. $3,022.87 0512653 KLAERS, ANNE M. .................................................................. $1,781.44 0512654 LEUER, GREGORY J. ............................................................. $2,210.86 0512655 MARTIN, KATHLEEN M .............................................................. $327.07 0512656 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. ................................................... $1,809.79 0512657 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D ........................................................... $2,207.57 0512658 MYHRE, JORDAN J ................................................................. $2,469.63 0512659 NELSON, JASON ..................................................................... $3,044.15 0512660 RATKE, TREVOR J .................................................................. $2,410.44 0512661 REID, ROBIN ............................................................................... $230.87 0512662 REINKING, DEREK M .............................................................. $2,530.16 0512663 RUCKE, MARIA ........................................................................ $1,866.70 0512664 SCHARF, ANDREW ................................................................. $2,462.75 0512665 SCHEIBE, CONNIE L ............................................................... $1,277.37 0512666 SCHERER, STEVEN T. ........................................................... $2,754.91 0512667 VINCK, JOHN J ........................................................................ $2,028.57 0512668 VOGEL, NICHOLE ................................................................... $1,077.11 0512669 WALKER, CAITLYN M. ............................................................ $2,056.30 0512670 BURSCH, JEFFREY ................................................................ $1,638.64 Total Payroll Direct Deposit $67,897.54