Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2009.01.13 McCall Airport Environmental AssessmentWHPRifit PROJECT STATUS REPORT Client: John Anderson, Airport Manager Project: McCall Airport Environmental Assessment Project No: 034256 PSR No: 001 (08-26-2008 thru 11-03-2008) Date: November 3, 2008 From: Rainse Anderson, P.E. Project Manager Distribution: US Mail and E-Mail PROJECT STATUS: WHPacific has: • Project team completed field investigations for wetlands, endangered species, and geotechnical soils. Cultural and archaeological field investigation pending. • Site was flown for aerial photography. • Scheduled first Airport Environmental Assessment Committee Meeting for December 3`d, 2008. WORK COMPLETED THIS PERIOD: WHPacific has completed: • Signed consulting agreement with City • Completed field investigations, except for cultural and archaeological • Surveying of project area ACTION REQUIRED: Item: Description: Action Reg'd By: Action Reg'd Date: Completed Date: 1 Submit field investigation reports to City and FAA WHP 11/21/2008 2 Aerial photo and data Subconsultant 11/24/2008 2 Review field investigation reports City and FAA 12/01/2008 3 Conduct AEAC meeting WHP 12/03/2008 C:IDocuments and SettingslbwagnerlLocal SettingslTemporary Internet Files\OLKI9\PSR # 1.doc November 3, 2008 McCall Airport Environmental Assessment Committee (AEAC) Meeting #1 December 3, 2008 Meeting: 5:30 — 7:00 p.m. McCall City Hall Attendees: AEAC Members City of McCall: John Anderson, McCall Airport Manager WHPacific, Inc: Rainse Anderson and Sarah Lucas Corvid Consulting: Laura Jackson 5:30 — 5:35 Welcome and Introductions John Anderson and Rainse Anderson 5:35 — 5:45 5:45 — 5:55 5:55 — 6:05 6:05 — 6:35 6:35 — 6:55 6:55 — 7:00 Project Overview and History John Anderson and Rainse Anderson AEAC Roles and Responsibilities Rainse Anderson Environmental Assessment Process Laura Jackson Results of Field Investigations Laura Jackson and Sarah Lucas Open Discussion Future Meeting dates and times All All WHPiiffl1c PROJECT STATUS REPORT Client: John Anderson, Airport Manager Project: McCall Airport Environmental Assessment Project No: 034256 PSR No: 002 (11-04-2008 thru 01-06-2009) Date: January 6, 2009 From: Rainse Anderson, P.E. Project Manager Distribution: US Mail and E-Mail PROJECT STATUS: WHPacific has: • Cultural and archaeological field investigation completed. • Contacted agencies and surveyor regarding Northern Idaho Ground Squirrel • Conducted first Airport Environmental Assessment Committee Meeting for December 3rd, 2008. WORK COMPLETED THIS PERIOD: WHPacific has completed: • Prepared Amendment #1 to address Northern Idaho Ground Squirrel issue • Completed cultural and archaeological field investigation, report pending from subconsultant • Airport Environmental Assessment Committee meeting #1, prepared FAQs for City's website, along with meeting presentation ACTION REQUIRED: Item: Description: Action Reg'd By: Action Reg'd Date: Completed Date: 1 Submit field investigation reports for review WHP 1/19/2008 2 Prepare draft alternatives section of EA WHP 2/2/2009 C:1Documents and Settingslbwagner\Local SettingslTemporary Internet Files\OLK19\PSR #2.doc November 3, 2008 HPaciflc PROJECT STATUS REPORT Client: John Anderson, Airport Manager Project: McCall Airport Environmental Assessment Project No: 034256 PSR No: 003 (01-06-2009 thru 02-02-2009) Date: February 2, 2009 From: Rainse Anderson, P.E. Project Manager Distribution: US Mail and E-Mail PROJECT STATUS: WHPacific has: • Submitted Amendment #1 address the Northern Idaho Ground Squirrel issue. • Submitted revised FAA reimbursement request to City. • Drafted the preliminary engineering design report, which includes cost estimates, to assist in selecting the Preferred Alternative. • Scheduled AEAC #2. WORK TO BE COMPLETED NEXT PERIOD: WHPacific will: • Update the Alternatives section to include the preliminary engineering design report. • Receive biological and archaeological reports from subconsultants. • Submit Alternatives packet, with complete design report, to the City, FAA, and AEAC for review. • Conduct AEAC #2. • Assist the City in selecting a Preferred Alternative. ACTION REQUIRED: Item: Description: Action Req'd By: Action Req'd Date: Completed Date: 1 Review/approve contract amendment #1 City 02/16/2009 2 Submit field investigation reports for review WHP and subconsultants 02/16/2009 3 Update draft alternatives, with engineering data WHP 02/18/2009 4 Transmit alternative chapter to City and AEAC WHP 02/18/2009 5 Conduct AEAC #2 WHP 03/04/2009 6 Selection of Preferred Alternative City, FAA, and WHP 03/13/2009 C:IDocuments and Settingslbwagner\Local Settings)Temporary Internet Files\OLK19\PSR #3.doc February 2, 2009 Delineation of Wetlands and Other Waters for McCall Airport Environmental Assessment Prepared for City of McCall, Idaho January93, 2009 Prepared by WHPacific, Inc. 9755 S.W. Barnes Road Portland, Oregon 97225 WHPacifit DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO Prepared for: John Anderson, AAE, Airport Manager McCall Airport 216 E. Park Street, McCall, Idaho 83638 (208) 634-1488 E-mail address: janderson@mccall.id.us Title: Delineation of Wetlands and Other Waters Project: McCall Airport Environmental Assessment McCall, Idaho Prepared by: WHPacific, Inc. 9755 SW Barnes Road, Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97225 Contact: Philip J. Quarterman, PWS Sr. Wetland Scientist (503) 372-3562 FAX: (503) 526-0775 E-mail address: pquarterman@whpacific.com WHP Project 34256 4' r DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO TABLE OF CONTENTS A PROJECT PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION 1 B DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA 1 C PRECIPITATION DATA AND ANALYSIS 2 D METHODS 3 E DESCRIPTION OF ALL WETLANDS AND OTHER NON -WETLAND WATERS 4 F MAPPING METHOD AND ACCURACY STATEMENT 8 G NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY 9 H RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 9 I DISCLAIMER 9 Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Table 1: Table 2: Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Appendix D: LIST OF FIGURES Location Map National Wetland Inventory Map County Soil Survey Map Aerial Photograph Wetland Map TABLES Monthly Precipitation Data for 2008 Water Year Prior to Site Visit Wetlands and Waters in Study Area Maps Data Forms Site Photographs Literature Citations APPENDICES WHP Project 34256 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO A PROJECT PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION The purpose of the wetland study is to delineate potentially jurisdictional wetlands and waters that might be affected by an eastward shift of the taxiway to meet FAA standards for separation. For the purposes of this study, we assumed the alternative with the greatest shift (400 feet for Class C-III aircraft). The study area extends onto private pasture land beyond the boundary fence. Wetlands and waters on this private parcel were previously delineated by Secesh Engineering (Airport East Wetland Delineation, October 2007). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concurred with the findings of this report in a letter dated February 28, 2008. The mapping for the previously delineated wetlands has been incorporated into Figure 5, Wetland Map. See Figure 1 (Vicinity Map) for an overview of the surrounding area. The study area is located in Township 18N, Range 3E, Section 21, Boise Meridian. B DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA The study area consists of the eastern portion of McCall Airport, from a line midway between the runway and taxiway to a point about 500 feet east of the runway centerline that includes a strip of the adjacent pasture. The study area occupies a level, low -terrace landscape position within the North Fork Payette River valley. The river is to the west. A higher terrace lies to the east. The land on either side of the southern half of the airport is in grazing use. The 16-34 runway and taxiway occupy the center of the airport property. An area of hangars and other light industrial buildings is located east of the taxiway. The main apron and base facilities are in the northeast corner of the airport. A Forest Service smoke jumper base lies to the west of the runway. The developed area of the City of McCall lies mostly to the north of the airport. Irrigation ditches cross the airport from east to west in culverts, fed by the Stringer Ditch Irrigation Canal. Drainage is generally to the west-southwest toward the river. A small natural intermittent stream runs east to west just to the south of the hangar area. It enters a culvert and runs under the airport toward the river. A snow storage basin is located south of the main apron area. It is used to detain snowmelt. Excess water drains out of a stand pipe. A major drainage ditch runs along the length of the study area from just south of the hangar area, parallel to the taxiway. Culverts at various points drain excess water under the airport and toward the west. Parts of the irrigation system in the field to the east intersect with this drainage ditch. See Figure 5 for these connections and direction of flow. Vegetation on the airport consists mainly of introduced grasses and weedy forbs, except in the drainage ditches, where vegetation is predominantly hydrophytic and consists of WHP Project 34256 1 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO sedges, rushes, a mixture of native and non-native grasses, and willows (see below for a more detailed description). The Soil Survey of Valley County Area, Idaho (Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1981) maps and describes soils in the study area. The soils formed in coarse glacial outwash materials. Out of the 6 soil series found in the general area, Melton loam, which is likely to occur in channels, seeps and on low terraces, is a hydric soil. Gestrin loam and Donnel sandy loam are both hydric soils which are found as inclusions in other map units. C PRECIPITATION DATA AND ANALYSIS Daily precipitation totals were obtained from the National Weather Service's McCall, ID weather station. We accessed the Preliminary Local Climatology Data (F6) for the ❑eriod from October 1 2007 to October 8, 2008, 2008 for daily and monthly precipitation totals. The table below presents these data. Table 1-Monthly Precipitation Data for 2007.2008 Water Year: Prior. to Site Visit Month Actual (in.) Departure from Average (in.) Cumulative Rainfall (in.) Cumulative Departure from Average (in.) October 2007 1.61 -0.11 1.61 -0.11 November 2007 2.71 -0.50 4.32 -0.61 December 2007 2.03 -1.42 6.35 -2.03 January 2008 3.16 -0.13 9.51 -2.16 February 2008 2.08 -0.84 11.59 -3.00 March 2008 1.79 -0.77 13.38 -3.77 April 2008 1.23 -0.84 14.61 -4.61 May 2008 1.29 -1.01 15.90 -5.62 June 2008 1.55 -0.48 17.45 -6.10 July 2008 0.21 -0.82 17.66 -6.92 August 2008 0.47 -0.58 18.13 -7.50 September 2008 0.87 -0.58 19.00 -8.08 October 2008* 0.27 -0.18 19.27 -8.26 TOTALS 19.27 in. -8.26 in. * Through end of site investigation, October 8. Departure from average is pro -rated. Rainfall for the 2007-2008 water year, plus the week of October 1-8, 2008 had been 19.27 inches, or 8.26 inches below average, which was 70% of average for that period, according to the WETS table for the McCall weather station. Also according to the WETS table, there is a 30 percent chance that the period from October 1 through September 30 would receive less than 23.78 inches of rain or more than 29.36 inches. Thus, total rainfall for the water year to date had been well below the "normal range". Each month had experienced below average rainfall. The rainfall for the three months prior to the site investigation had been 0.21 inch for July (20.4% of normal), 0.47 inch for August (44.8% of normal), and 0.87 inch for September (60% of normal). Rainfall for WHP Project 34256 2 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO the 14 days prior to starting the site investigation had been 0.27 inch, of which 0.26 inch fell on October 4. There was no rainfall during the period of the field investigation. D METHODS Upon receiving a request to perform the work, we examined information provided by the City of McCall. • Airport East Wetland Delineation Report, and Corps of Engineers letter of concurrence (February 27, 2008) • Airport Layout Plan (Toothman-Orton Engineering Co., 2007) showing an earlier wetland delineation, verified by Corps of Engineers letter March 25, 1996, which is no longer valid (older than 5 years), and • Maps showing three alternative alignments for the new taxiway in relation to the 2007 delineated wetlands. The Airport East report included the following information: ■ A vicinity map, ■ The wetland map, and ■ Data forms. We also called Greg Martinez (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Project Manager, Boise) to discuss the previous delineation on February 15, 2008. The report was being reviewed at that time. He explained that all wetlands in that report are linked to the North Fork Payette River, and are therefore under Corps jurisdiction. We conducted our site investigation on October 6-8, 2008. Data collected on -site at sample plots by WHPacific were recorded on the Routine Wetland Determination Data Form provided by the Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Regional Supplement to the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual. A total of 13 sample plots were examined within the study area (see Figure 5). See Appendix B for copies of the data forms. We began by walking the site and establishing the direction and path of water drainage on the site, including the portion of the adjacent pasture that is included in the study area. We noted the location of culverts, and any irrigation ditches and streams flowing into the study area. We established plots within likely wetland features, and where wetland conditions were found, we established additional plots to characterize adjacent uplands. We marked the plot locations with wire flags. WHP Project 34256 3 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO We made the following observations at the plots. • Where there was standing water, we noted the depth. • Where standing water was absent, we dug soil pits to a depth of 18 inches to look for direct and indirect indicators of a water table or soil saturation, such as oxidized rhizospheres. • We performed a visual observation of the soil surface to determine the presence of other primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology. This information was recorded on the field sheets. At each plot, we also observed soil characteristics. Soil color and texture characteristics were observed to a depth of 18 inches by removing and opening a slice of soil representing the soil profile We established vegetation sample plots around each soil pit. Generally, unless otherwise noted on the data sheet, the herb layer was sampled within a 5-foot radius around the soil pit and the tree and shrub layers were sampled within a 15-foot diameter around the pit. We marked the wetland boundary with wire flags, based on the findings in the plots. We dug informal soil pits in places to check soil and hydrology conditions, and fix the wetland boundary location, based on what we had seen in documented plots. Where we identified sections of drainage ditch, streams or other features that clearly drain toward the river, but do not have wetland characteristics, we flagged the estimated elevation of Ordinary High Water. Finally, we documented the main features with photographs (Appendix C). The wetland boundaries were surveyed by a WHPacific survey crew, and a map of wetlands was prepared. See Figure 5, Wetland Map. E DESCRIPTION OF ALL WETLANDS AND OTHER NON -WETLAND WATERS The field investigation identified seven areas that met wetland criteria in the study area, a reach of a small channelized intermittent stream, four non -wetland drainage ditches, and a non -wetland snow storage basin, totaling approximately 229,850 square feet (5.27 acres). See Table 2 for a summary of wetlands and waters in the study area. The wetland areas and boundaries and sample plot locations are shown on Figure 5. Descriptions of areas and the basis of delineation are given below. Features are numbered from south to north, starting on Figure 5, Sheet 4. Areas 1 and 6A: Airport Drainage Ditch Wetlands: These features are emergent wetland areas with a few patches of shrub -scrub. They are constructed linear drainage ditches that capture stormwater runoff from the taxiway. Irrigation ditches in the adjacent pasture also contribute water. Due to irrigation practices, the ditches are subject to WHP Project 34256 4 r DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS N MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO TABLE 2: WETLANDS AND WATERS IN STUDY AREA Resource Description Area (sq. ft.) Cowardin Class Area 1. Drainage Ditch Wetland Constructed airport drainage ditch. Drains under runway. Perennial shallow inundation or saturation. Sedges, rushes and grasses. 12,205 PEM1 H (Permanently inundated/ saturated) Area 2: Irrigation Ditch and Associated Wetlands Linear ditch opening into saturated pasture area, extending into airport property. Drains around end of runway. Native and introduced grasses, sedges 12,534 PEM1 C (Seasonally saturated) Area 3: Pasture Wetland and Irrigation Ditch Wetlands Saturated area in pasture, extending into airport property, associated with irrigation ditch. Native and introduced grasses, sedges 28,078 Ditto Area 4: Pasture Wetland Saturated area in pasture, extending into airport property, associated with irrigation ditch. Willow, native and introduced grasses, sedges 7,017 Ditto Areas 5A and 5B: Irrigation Ditch Wetlands Linear irrigation ditches. Native and introduced grasses, sedges 2,439 (5A) 1,411 (5B) Ditto Area 6A: Drainage Ditch Wetland Constructed airport drainage ditch. Drains under runway. Seasonal shallow inundation or saturation. Sedges, rushes and grasses. 9,843 Ditto Area 6B: Drainage Ditch ( Non -Wetland Water) Constructed airport drainage ditch, continuation of Area 6A, drier. Short duration inundation and saturation. Grasses and forbs. 9,495 N/A Area 7: Irrigation Ditch Wetland Linear irrigation ditch. Drains under runway. Native and introduced grasses, sedges 2,835 PEM1 C (Seasonally saturated) Area 8: Drainage Ditch Wetland Constructed airport drainage ditch. Seasonally inundated or saturated during high flows in intermittent stream (Area 9). 6,050 Ditto Area 9: Intermittent Stream (Water) Channelized natural stream, intermittent flow. Drains under runway. Channel is cobble and gravel, sparsely vegetated. 2,352 R4 (Riverine intermittent) Area 10: Drainage Ditch (Non -Wetland Water) Constructed airport drainage ditch. Seasonally saturated during rain, snowmelt. Connects to Area 9. 4,314 Area 11: Snow Storage/Detention Basin (Isolated Non- Wetland Water) * Excavated basin for snow storage and stormwater detention, discharges from two culverts. Standpipe controls outflow. Drains to swale between taxiway and runway, and infiltrates into ground. No connection to natural drainage system. Sparsely vegetated. 128,242 * N/A Area 12: Drainage Ditch (Isolated Non- Wetland Water) * Constructed airport drainage ditch. Connects to Area 11. Sparsely vegetated. 3,035 * N/A TOTALS Jurisdictional: Non -Jurisdictional: 98,573 s.f. 131,277 s.f. *Isolated and Non jurisdictional (see discussion and conclusions) WHP Project 34256 5 V DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO shallow inundation or saturation year throughout the growing season. Water in the ditches flows gradually toward two culverts. These culverts convey excess water under the runway, and toward a drainage system that eventually discharges into the North Fork Payette River. Conditions in the ditches are characterized by Plots Al, D1, and El. Vegetation is a mixture of sedges, especially Nebraska sedge (Carex nebrascensis, OBL), water sedge (Carex aquatilis, OBL), and inflated sedge C. utriculata (vesicaria), OBL), rushes, especially Baltic rush (Juncus balticus, FACW) and grasses, especially bluejoint (Calamagrostis canadensis, FACW). Also common is large -leaved avens (Geum macrophyllum, FACW). Soils are mainly low-chroma sandy loam with or without redox concentrations. Hydrogen sulfide odor is commonly present, indicating reducing conditions. We observed shallow inundation at Plot D1, and in many other parts of the ditch. Plot E1 marks the northerly extent of this area. At that point, there was saturation at a depth of 12 inches, and soils met the sandy redox indicator. There were also indicators of seasonal inundation nearby (drift material caught in vegetation shown in photos 7 and 8). There was also dominance by hydrophytes. The delineation was based for the most part on the abrupt change in hydrology and soils near the base of the side slopes. The northerly extent of the wetland area was delineated between Plots E1 and E3. Due to the gradual slope of the ditch bottom, Plot E3 differed from Plot El. It lacked indicators of hydric soils and wetland hydrology. Areas 2, 3, 4, 5A, 5B, and 7: Irrigation Ditches and Associated Wetlands: These features are irrigation ditches that cross the pasture to the east and adjacent wetlands. All except Area 7 intersect with the airport drainage ditch. At the time of the investigation, a little water was still present in some of the ditches (see Photo 1). Area 2 enters a culvert and flows around the end of the taxiway and runway, draining ultimately to the river via a series of irrigation ditches to the west. There was a small amount of flow in this ditch. Area 7 flows under the airport through a culvert and also drains ultimately to the river. The water in the irrigation ditches spreads out into the adjacent pasture in some places, and also into the flat area along the airport fence, before flowing down the bank into the airport drainage ditch, causing saturated conditions and allowing hydrophytes to become well established. Conditions in the ditches are characterized by Plot B1 and in the associated wetlands by Plots Al and C1. In addition, Transect 9, Plot 1 in the Airport East Delineation Report documents conditions in the extension of Area 3 to the east. The dominant plant in Area 2 irrigation ditch is inflated sedge with lesser amounts of bluejoint and water hemlock (Cicuta douglasii, OBL). Dominant plant species in the associated wetlands include inflated sedge, bluejoint, and Nebraska sedge. Also dominant WHP Project 34256 6 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO in many areas, especially in the pasture, is Baltic rush, which is documented in Transect 9, Plot 1. Soils are again typically sandy loam with some clay content, which meet either redox dark surface or sandy redox hydric soils indicators. Saturation to the surface was present at Plots Al and B 1. Plot C 1 had water stained leaves with a channel leading from the pasture nearby. With the exception of Areas 4, 5A and 5B, all wetlands shown east of the airport property line were delineated by Secesh Engineering. We identified Areas 4, 5A and 5B in the pasture in addition. These areas were not shown on the Airport East wetland maps, but they have the same characteristics as the other irrigation ditches and associated wetlands. We delineated the boundaries of Areas 4, 5A and 5B based on characteristic vegetation patterns (dominance of sedges and rushes versus pasture grasses), topographic features (slight depressions), and defined ditch features. These areas were added to the delineation based on a phone conversation with Greg Martinez (October 7, 2008). All these irrigation ditches and associated wetlands are ultimately connected to the North Fork Payette River via culverts under the airport. Areas 6B: Non -Wetland Drainage Ditch: Area 6B is a constructed airport drainage ditch, a continuation of Area 6A. As noted above, conditions in the non -wetland part of this ditch are characterized by Plot E3, which lacked indicators of hydric soils and wetland hydrology. The part of the ditch closest to Plot E3 still had some hydrophytes such as Baltic rush. However, further to the north even broadly -distributed hydrophytes like Baltic rush dropped out of the plant community to be replaced by grasses and weedy forbs. See Photo 9 for a view of this ditch from the northern end. This ditch is ultimately connected, via Areas 1 and 6A and culverts under the airport, to the North Fork Payette River. Area 8: Airport Drainage Ditch Wetland: Area 8 is a short section of drainage ditch that connects to Area 9, an intermittent stream. According to the airport maintenance manager ("AJ", pers. comm., October 6, 2008) during high flows that exceed the capacity of the culvert under the airport, water from the stream backs up into this ditch, causing seasonal inundation. The duration of inundation and saturation is unknown, but is probably more than 14 days. Conditions in the ditch are characterized by Plot F1. The main indicator of wetland hydrology was a thin algal crust (see Photo 16). Besides Baltic rush, we identified patches of small annual hydrophytes such as cudweed (Gnaphalium sp., FAC) and purslane speedwell (Veronica peregrina, OBL) which are typical of seasonally saturated conditions (seed Photo 15). The plot lacks indicators of hydric soil, but if inundation and WHP Project 34256 7 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO saturation exceed 14 days, as seems likely, this are meets the definition of hydric soil even in the absence of visible indicators. Area 8 is ultimately connected to the North Fork Payette River via the intermittent stream and the culvert under the airport. Area 9: Intermittent Stream: This stream flows in from the east and continues through a culvert to the western side of the airport, which discharges into a natural channel. The stream reach in the study area has been channelized along the airport property line (see Photo 13). The stream bed consists of cobble and gravel, and is thinly vegetated. There was no indication of recent flow. According to the airport maintenance manager ("AJ", pers. comm. October 7, 2008), this stream flows strongly in the winter, and during the spring snowmelt season. As noted above, it connects directly to the North Fork Payette River. Areas 10, 11, and 12: Snow Storage Basin and Non -Wetland Drainage Ditches: The snow storage basin (see Photos 17 and 18) was constructed in an upland location to store snow plowed off the runway and taxiway, and detain snowmelt. It also captures stormwater runoff from three culverts. The basin is non -wetland. It is largely unvegetated and there were no indicators of wetland hydrology. It has been excavated to the subsoil, which consists of gravel and cobble. A standpipe (Photo 17) allows water to be detained. During extreme rainfall or snowmelt events, excess water flows through a culvert, then discharges to an area between the taxiway and the runway, infiltrating into the ground ("AJ", pers. comm. 12/9/08). Area 11 is therefore isolated from the river or other parts of the natural drainage system. Drainage ditches Areas 10 and 12 capture local stormwater runoff (see Photo 19). They lack hydrophytic vegetation, the substrate is gravel or cobble subsoil. There is no indication of prolonged flow in them, such as a drift line, or other indicator of ordinary high water elevation. Area 10 connects to the intermittent stream and ultimately to the North Fork Payette River. Area 12 connects to the snow storage basin, and is thus isolated. F MAPPING METHOD AND ACCURACY STATEMENT Wetland boundaries and sample plot flags were tied by a WHPacific survey crew using total station equipment. The level of accuracy was to within 0.1 foot. An aerial photograph (see Figure 4) of the airport was developed from a flight by 3Di West, dated October 2008. A topographic base map was developed from this aerial, with contour interval of 1 foot. This topographic base map was added to the surveyed wetland boundaries and sample plot locations to create Figure 5. WHP Project 34256 8 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO G NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY The wetlands are identified on the National Wetland Inventory (see Figure 3). The intermittent stream is not identified on the NWI map. There is currently no Local Wetland Inventory for this area. H RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS We identified the following features in the study area: • Nine (9) discrete areas of wetland, including drainage and irrigation ditches, and associated wetlands, • Four (4) discrete non -wetland "waters" (three drainage ditches and a snow storage basin), and • One intermittent stream ("water"). Based on our conversations with Greg Martinez (pers. comm., October 7, 2008), the Corps of Engineers takes jurisdiction over any wetlands or waters that are connected to the North Fork of the Payette River. The intermittent stream and non -wetland drainage ditches (except Area 12), irrespective of whether an Ordinary High Water line is visible, are normally considered jurisdictional, and are classified as "tributaries". Any areas that meet wetland criteria and are connected to the river by tributaries are considered jurisdictional "adjacent wetlands" or "abutting wetlands". According to Greg, the Corps may in some circumstances determine that duration of flow is insufficient for a channel to be considered a tributary, but the default assumption is that all connected channels are "tributaries" and are under Corps jurisdiction. The snow_storage-basin (Area 11)-and-its associated_drainage_ditch (Area_12)are_ not connected to_the-river,-and of considered-"-isolated"=b_y__tlie=Corps,=and_not=under=their junsdiction. Summary: Total area of wetlands and waters in the study area: 25 7 acres. Total area of; jurisdictional wetlan_d's and waters in the study area: 2.26_acres: Total area of Lori-jurisdietional (isolated) waters in the study area: 3.01 acres. I DISCLAIMER This report documents the investigation, best professional judgment and conclusions of the investigators. It is correct and complete to the best of our knowledge. It should be considered a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination of wetlands and other waters and used at your own risk unless it has been reviewed and approved in writing by the Corps of Engineers under their jurisdictional standards. WHP Project 34256 9 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO APPENDIX A MAPS WHP Project 34256 10 Approximate Study Area WHPacific Location Map McCall Airport McCall, Idaho Figure 1 J Z 7 116.6-20 Y7 116-6i0 W 116-5-40W 116b20 W ii, ' — • F PUBHx .-_.IfsOCA n n: iv-ir=Pn Pax x �x PABF / PUBHh d (� R2UBH' P 0q i( ` . i Idaho Mil.° KRAFIL_ ee\,„_ R J ) fib,„„•/ .. Q F,A 4YFT .®. ® f1 �. Approximate Location of Study Area 116520 W n Y z WHPaific National Wetland Inventory Map McCall Airport McCall, Idaho Figure 2 67, Map Sae: 110000 I minter! ea Ask., (0.5' x 111 Met. Meters O 10D. 200 • 400 COO O 400 eon USDA Natural Resources WIN Conservation Semite WHPaufit 1.000 • Feet 2.400 Web Soll Survey 2.1 National Cooperative Soil Survey Legend: 2, 3 — Archebald Loam 1,17 — Donnel Sandy Loam 22,23 — Gestin Loam 31 — McCall complex 34 — Melton Loam 40 Pits, gravel County Soil Map McCall Airport McCall, ID 12/4/2008 Page 1 (43 4 4 Figure 3 E 0 C B A" z- SCALE 2 <60 (.FEET ) 4r Al 400 4 7 LEGEND E 0 10 ® 0 01 S:=15 ® ® 0 AREA 12 (DRAINAGE DITCH, NON —WETLAND) 01 01 AREA 11 SNOW STORAGE / DETENTION BASIN A z- SCALE o .z3 do goo ( FEET ) 0000 O �Q � , WETLAND PLOT FLAG FLOW DIRECTION PHOTO POINT, DIRECTION WETLAND STREAM STORMWATER DETENTION BASIN_ /.NON —WETLAND DRAINAGE DITCH STUDY AREA CULVERT 00 0 d a CULVERT AREA 10 DRAINAGE DITCH — NON —WETLAND g m==u nt#:s •==5 •==, •==.� 2 S I 7 D e=!:3 4=2a I AREA 10 c::=1 Az CULVERT DRAINAGE DITCH - NON -WETLAND STREAM CONTINUES AREA 9 INTERMITTENT STREAM CULVERT PLOT F1 Pi pi Toil CONTINUES AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE AREA 8 DRAINAGE DITCH LEGEND 400' EAST OF RUNWAY CENTERLINE ��IRRtGATION DITCH WETLAND PLOT FLAG FLOW DIRECTION PHOTO POINT, DIRECTION WETLAND STREAM STORMWATER DETENTION BASIN: / NON -WETLAND DRAINAGE DITCH STUDY AREA CULVERT AREA 6B DRAINAGE DITCH (NON WETLAND) NOTE: WITH EXCEPTION OF AREAS 44, 5A & 5B, WETLANDS SHOWN EAST OF AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE WERE DELINEATED BY SECESH ENGINEERING. (CORPS CONCURRENCE 62/27/08) AREA 7 a===i n==L •==11 •=a •=i .==N S=2 R=3, Rs Kz=1, .C=2 •=7=2 y a ,, .c=z? Ki=mt, tom. lc= %==. ‘2=. �'• z SCALE O 25 50 100 (FEET ) 1 5 6. 7 LEGEND �N Z W CO 2 J 9 A %==1 1==1 S==3 ® =Ma Cam] ® C'=1 ® t=5 T3=5 M=M3 e==A ® t"t '=:h =3 ® =3 12=3 ® t= M=5 400` EAST OF RUNWAY CENTERLINE AREA 68 DRAINAGE DITCH — NON —WETLAND I 300' EAST OF RUNWAY CENTERLINE ,E --X PLOT E3 PLOT E2 . ..... .. .• .......::•y: lam. PLOT E1 AREA 6A DRAINAGE DITCH — WETLAND © WETLAND PLOT FLAG FLOW DIRECTION PHOTO POINT, DIRECTION WETLAND STREAM STORMWATER DETENTION BASIN / NON —WETLAND DRAINAGE DITCH e. c STUDY' AREA i---i CULVERT .==1 t== /0=1 -*MO AIRPORT ,PROPERTY. LINE 111///T1r1zzym//////�/77//7/77///////////////////, 240' EAST OF RUNWAY CENTERLINE A=k K=ad •=2J .e=ea • °d L'=' • t Tit �+ �+^ .=:=3 •==i. e •==. '1=2 L.a T=2s n==3. •'3 "==5 'C=` RUNWAY 16-34 CENTERLINE z- T W MATCHLINE 25' SCALE o so 100 ( FEET ) E a IE=M a-® AREA 5B 400' EAST OF AREA 6A DRAINAGE DITCH — A ®-Z- SCALE 0 ?5 50 100 (F 1 • 944 ,e//://0 NWAY CENTERLINE TLAND AREA 5A' AREA 4 NOTE.. WITH EXCEPTION OF AREAS 4; 5A & 5B; WETLANDS SHOWN EAST OF AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE WERE DELINEATED BY SECESH ENGINEERING. (CORPS CONCURRENCE 02/27/08) AREA 2 IRRIGATION DITCH AREA 3 ©PLOT C2 AREA 1 (DRAINAGE DITCH). EXISTING TAXIWAY AREA 2 LEGEND .<5..1(Qi 4 ® m 1 WETLAND PLOT FLAG FLOW DIRECTION PHOTO POINT, DIRECTION WETLAND STREAM STORMWATER DETENTION BASIN / NON- WETLAND DRAINAGE DITCH STUDY AREA CULVERT (71777,14/ a • PLOT Al • �02 wow'izezze�, •4'°•,b PLOT A2 PLOT A3 �PLCT 81 o PLOT B2 / I — I 6 7 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO APPENDIX B DATA FORMS WHP Project 34256 11 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region (DRAFT) Project/Site: Ike t•citA fir p City/County: INALA.14 / UA1)4-1,jf Sampling Date: I 0 i 6 1dg Applicant/Owner: MY roVir . State: iD Sampling Point: A l lnvestigator(s): P.4 /L-•Pr Section, Tovmship, Range: 'r j r t' I--% -G'/ 5- 2_j (gm) Landform (hilisiope, terrace, etc.): 1i•le ✓a+ u- Local relief (concave, convex, none): Fi e-v y Slope (%): Subregion (LRR): L1_a_ Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V Are Vegetation N , Soli (Nr , or Hydrology W significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation N _. Soil iV , or Hydrology 6/ naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. NWI classification: No (If no, explain In Remarks.) Are "Norma! Circumstances' present? Yes ✓ . No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soli Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes I No Yeses_ No Yes to' • No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes _� No Remarks: VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) 1. N /A, 2. 3. 4. Absolute Dominant Indicator °% Cover Species? Status Total Cover. Saplino/Shrub Stratum I. WM 2. 3. 4. 5. Total Cover. Herb Stratum. I. <<c-44SC ,•ca"s-i 144.1 4.4, el- - 3. re'i ! ,4w. / Leal 44 i I.1" � 4. e?'� e✓p• i'vt'tr_4, ap�yl.i awe It ism A-14 w e 4_4 b 4,..+Ali Cr 5. S. 7, 8. Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Z (A) Z (B) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species Tnat Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 00 (AM) _ �+= 0. tAN _ t'v 01, 5 N Fie•—� T N Total Cover:1 D 0 Woody Vine Stratum I. N/71 2, Total Cover. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum N%74 Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °% Cover of: Multiply bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 T. FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators: Dominance Test Is >50°% _ Prevalence index is s3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants _. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes tf- No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast -- DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 SOiL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm Depth Matra Redox Features • the absence of Indicators.) Texture Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvper Loot o — `i, 1 o i R z/ I - - _ - 5a .A.4 4 Jo A., 4 - jo 10 I eLvi VD /d 1 it via I5 c F°t 1,- 4 t2- 4 / G 5 ` M, (lc- v t 144 4,6 ti kvo ,1 ,{ / /�( / 0 „' I t " IQ- - {� i tt S/ / Sid -7. 5 if iti l g 15 e- fri rt, I L s-Q fA..z„ io (A., tType: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL-Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all Mils, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ^, Histosol (A1) _ Sandy Redox (85) 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matra (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) r Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) ._ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ZiRedox Dark Surface (F6) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'indicators of hydrophyfic vegetation and _ Sandy Gleyed Matra (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive layer (if present): Type: W / 4 Hydric Soli Present? Yes t% No Depth (Inches): Remarks: • HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Water-Stalned Leaves (B9) (NW coast) Concave Surface (68) (610) Table (C2) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (02) (D3) (D4) (D5) (D6) (LRR A) _ Surface Water (A1) _. Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except NW coast) _ Sparsely Vegetated _ High Water Table (A2) Salt Crust (B11) _ Drainage Pattems ../ Saturation (A3) _ Aquatic invertebrates (B13) Dry -Season Water Water Marks (Bi) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _Saturation Visible — Sediment Deposits (B2) _40xidlzed Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position Drift Deposits (B3) ._ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard Alga! Mat or Crust (64) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) _ F(ost-Heave Hummocks _ iron Deposits (65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ FAG -Neutral Test _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Other (Explain In Remarks) _ Raised Ant Mounds _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ►� No Water Table Present? Yes No t/ Depth Ouches): Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): SurrA e4 , (Includes capillary fringe) ` Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspec ions), If available: Remarks: • US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast — DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region (DRAFT) Project/Site: N e. G'A4t Q Applicant/Owner: MvpalAr Investigator(s): r 4 / L-T Section, Township, Range: L.andform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): i •e-,"?-" 6.e Local relief (concave, convex, none): k- Slope eh): ^6"" L E Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum: NI /A Soli Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatlo / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No Of no, explain In Remarks.) Are Vegetation, N , Son N , or Hydrology PI significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation N Soil , or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers In Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc, Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes • No c/ Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No 4� Remarks: VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names) 1. A z 3. 4. Totai Cover Saoling/Shrub Stratum 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Total Cover. 3. 5. r it1,4 pre, +/-kiVie 6. City/County: A►il At/ r V 6 I / Sampling Date: 1 P/‘ /d � State: )7 Sampling Point: A -2. `7-15 N I LIa M) Absolute Dominant indicator % Cover Species? Status - `- -5---- FA 4- PA e_ 10 N f �e "l-Q y OM., t , Herb Stratum. 1. /5t pro Atfro_J t i 3 J� N 7. 8. Total Cover. / 0 CI Woody Vine Stratum 1. l�/r4 2. °% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum r!/a Total Cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: I aD (AB) Prevalence Index worksheet; Total % Cover of: Multiply bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4= UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = 8/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test Is >50°% _ Prevalence Index 1s 53.0' Morphological Adaptations.' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'indicators of hydric soli and wetland hydrology must be present. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes tf- No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast — DRAFT Version 9-15-2008 SOIL Sampling Point A2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm Depth Matra Redox Features • the absence of indicators.) Texture Remarks Qnches) Color (moist) °% Color (moist) °% Tvoei Loca o- 7' Jo h ft. Zl! — `'.•::� ' - - PAA 56,i4,1.1 )6ar.� -7- itf t O art Ltli 9 s 7,5 9aLi/G 5 C. toel t r •, r, wf snA+i,LI Sol Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (85) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matra (S6) _ Red Parent Material (IT2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mlnerat (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) ,_. Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ,_, Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _ Depleted Matra (F3) ,_. Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (81) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if•present): Type: N / A Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓.- Depth (inches): • Remarks: D 0 C.y in G1- 1104_4 V ea'4 fr) 61m 'kJ- pea I er: a 4.4 for)6)- 14 y D H 4 . ski i S HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary indicators (2 or more required) WaterStained Leaves (89) (NW coast) Concave Surface (B8) (B10) Table (C2) on Aerial imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) (D4) (D5) (D6) (LRR A) Surface Water (A1) _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except NW coast) _ Sparsely Vegetated _ High Water Table (A2) ._ _ Salt Crust (B11) _ Drainage Patterns Saturation (A3) _ Aquatic invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water _ Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible _ Sediment Deposits (B2) ^ Oxidized Rhtzospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Frost -Heave Hummocks Iron Deposits (85) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ FAC-Neutral Test _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Raised Ant Mounds Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No, Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): (Includes capillary fringe) . Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring wall, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast — DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region (DRAFT) / ,:- Project/Site: ki 1 est'u. A i C1ty/Counfy: %�- / VA.` /1 Sampling Date: / 6 .n ! d jtcant/Owner � f i' State: il? I Sampling Point: A 03 ARp�: � y j .c ..i 1 3 S � F. L. lnvestptor(s): P al1.r Section, Township, Range: `I i S 14 �' /1/1 Sloe °% ,'7° ta' ndform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): � ��-%`Y� �•- Local relief (concave, convex, none): P ( i' Subregion (LRR): Lat: Long: Datum: N 64 Sol Map Unit Name: NWl classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V- No Of no, explain in Remarks.) _;Are Vegetation 14 , Soli N , or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes ram- No rise Vegetation hJ , Soil /'V , or Hydrology PI naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) ix; SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes • No T Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No ✓ Remarks: 'VEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Use scientific names) °% Cover Species? Status 1. NIA 2. 3. 4. Total Cover: Saolino/Shrub Stratum 1. //1 2. 3. 4. 5, Total Cover. Herb Stratum. 1. AS' ro f 9 Yin,* r.4-11 +css. y .mod y 2. Ai f t,.3 id 4 +vi.r . ; l i "r , N 4-1,t 3. (4.-v.4 1 Ui•4.4 1 rt ¢-.,__ 5' N 091. 4. 5. 6 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum 1. IV fit 2. Total Cover. 10 6 Total Cover. °% Bare Ground In Herb Stratum • 1. Doralnance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAO: 1 (A) a Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent Of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: / U (AB) Prevalence Index worksheet: k; Total °%Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 =_ UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test Is >50°% ^_ Prevalence Index Is.Or _ Morphological Adaptationst (Provide supporting data In Remarks or on a separate sheet). _ Wetland Non Vascular Plants' • _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) indicators of hydrlc soli and wetland hydrology must be present Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes t.� No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valleys and Coast — DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 .r SOIL Sampling Point: A-3 _ Profile Description: (Describe to the depth' needed to document the indicator or confirm Depth Matrix Redox Features • the absence of indicators.) Texture Remarks (inches[) Color (moist) °% Color (moist) % Tyeef Loc2 try - f 6 4- tr o Lt g e- 4 2'- _ - y. -- - ._.. 51.6 f". i tNi t ( !r 6JAI D n Pt-. t i • TType: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted,) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3: Histosol (A1) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ , 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Hlstic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matra (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Other (Expiain In Remarks) •_. Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2) •_-_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matra (F3) _ Thick DarkSurface (Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Gleyed Matra (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: if / f Hydric Soli Present? Yes No V.-- Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (env one indicator Is sufficient). Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Water -Stained Leaves (69) (NW coast) Concave Surface (BB) (1370) Table (C2) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (02) (D3) (D4) (D5) (D6) (LRR A) _ Surface Water (A1) _ Water-Stalned Leaves (69) (except NW coast) ^ Sparsely Vegetated High Water Table (A2) _ Salt Crust (B11) _ Drainage Patterns _ Saturation (A3) _ Aquatic invertebrates (1313) _ Dry -Season Water _ Water Marks (131) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible _, Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhlzospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduceil Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent iron Reduction In Tilted Solts (C6) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks iron Deposits (135) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ FAC-Neutral Test _ Surface Solt Cracks (B6) . _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Raised Ant Mounds _ inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No tr Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Le -- Water Table Present? Yes No 1/ Depth (inches): , Saturation Present? Yes No V' Depth (inches): • (Includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valleys and Coast— DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region (DRAFT) l Project/Slte: bite r°, iA AP City/County: k e C",14 I trA 11 141 Sampling Date: % a ! 71/o State: ` /, Sampling Point: B Investigator(s): Ili / t. `r- Section, Township, Range: -rI e N (k.t.E s''Z I i gril Landform (hitislope, terrace, etc.): re-e Ka 44- Local relief (concave, convex, none): ( etyc-Slope (%):"'$' Sub►egion (LRR): L 211- E Let: Soli Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No Of no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation N Soil IN) . or Hydrology I`) significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances• present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation t 4 . Soli N or Hydrology h/ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) Applicant/Owner p SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soli Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Yes v No Yes 6-" • No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ►-•". No Remarks: VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) 1. J 2. 3. 4. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Total Cover. Saolino/Shrub Stratum 1. N/A 2. 3. 4. 5. Total Cover. 1. 6 5 1 a fit- z• r Yo Ad D8 `. 3. G-r wr,s�n 1' �' f i r,+K., S tV r/ 656/ 4. �- 'T N Frti.. 5. 5 N F6 z s. P ket ( o t„-) p a wttr, ".. te 0, "t- ki r4e14/ 7. CAI. t'arwa/ rrtti'7` rot IAe-be.,./eS i0 N FACW 8. fs_.f-dee-�ref-eleveteet rt C'r.r 5 of e01 Total Cover. 100 Herb Stratum 44.1%e-i 1At- r i Gr-� 1A - A_ GG cb., Icrii M PhI..c AS roc TIT . Woody Vine Stratum 1. 1 11 2. Total Cover. % Bare Ground In Herb Stratum `1" Remarks: Long: Datum: N M Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across Ail Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: f (0 v (A/B) i (A) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply bv: OBL species x 1= FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = • 'Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A (5) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Dominance Test Is >50% _ Prevalence Index Is 53.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non Vascular Plants' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydrtc soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes v‘e— No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast - DRAFT Version 945-2008 SOIL Sampling Point 13 1 Priitile;pescription:• (Dessiibe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm Depth , ;1,-.. ' ' Matrix Redox Features • the absence of Indicators.) . Texture Remarks finches) ""=::: "t ojor (moist) • °% _ - Color (moist) °% Type' toe • ...: ,; ` y WI _ _ _ - - 9-A vs-t.. S'a It4),1 J 6ii 1,-...,2--i - '...-'1 srI . _ - Sti�y c-!<ty ic�0►iv,\ II--- 1 10 7>z 2/i > 4,5 7,G`in. Lilt, <5 L. M Or4�a, e-.14,7 /6-4AN 10 Lt 1z 5/1 2-5 2.Ail Type: C=Concentration, D=iiiVetion, RM=Reduced Mafix, 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. Hydric Soli Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) . ,,, - _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) • ,_, Histic Epipedop (A2)'" , ' . ' _ Stripped Mat t< (S6) ` Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3); _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) 7 Hydrogen Sulfide (AG) -• _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) •_,_• Depleted Below bark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick DarkSurface (Al2) Z Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ^ Depleted Dark Surface (F) 'Indicators of hydrophytio vegetation and _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) . Redox Depressions (FB) wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: iV 1A Hydric Soil Present? Yes 1,/ No Depth (inches): , , Remarks: 1 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators (anv one indlcatorksufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Water -Stained Leaves (69) (NW coast) Concave Surface (B6) (B10) Table (C2) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) (D4) (D5) (D6) (LRR A) _ Surface Water (A1) , , Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except NW coast) _ Sparsely Vegetated a Water'(abte (A2) _' Salt Crust (611) _ Drainage Patterns Saturaijbj03 ) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (813) 'Season Water .. _ VVOOMarks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) uration Visible �:::-•t • _ SillmenDeposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position g.:.. • _ t itift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard _ Algal Mat or Crust p4) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks iron Deposits (65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ FAC-Neutral Test _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) „ Other (Explaktin. Remarks) _ Raised Ant Mounds , _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No d Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No Water Table Present? Yes No V Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): S,. VP i-c (includes capillary fringe) -. Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspec , ions), If available: Remarks: n US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast -- DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Westem Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region (DRAFT) ProjecUSite: k i egim AP City/County: me 444, V 4 II, Sampling Date: I a 19IOC Appiicant/Owner: Nero/I( State: z r) Sampling Point: 13 2• investigator(s): P 424 / L.--r Section, Township, Range: rig N R- 7E. r C -x-, / ( P M tandform (hilisiope, terrace, etc.): i tia v"r...L. Local relief (concave, convex, none): fl f-41 Slope (%).re4 Subregion (LRR): LP F' r Lat: Long: Datum: N IA NWl classification: Soli Map Unit Name: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation N , Soli N . or Hydrology. N significantly disturbed? Are °Normal Circumstances' present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation N , Soil N , or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Remarks: Yes rJ No Yes No Yes No —..V--_ Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No 17 VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names) 1. PnA 2. 3. 4. Totat Cover. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Sapling/Shrub Stratum 1. N//t 2. 3. 4. 5. Total Cover. Herb Stratum. 1. 14S,5eta c far, r t p-ttol$' 2.• /i• bk. �t ir‘..- rv,; /kip / i vm 3. (I p r da'fi t t %.1r- y, 4. "grit firF d� ciY► t11+.4, 1 t l 5. tr p ✓�. f tort 3 a • III A s i r 7. 8. y l S N Fi4 e.4.r f® N foie— r hl PVC Jd N riA N Total Cover. /0 0 Woody Vine Stratum 1. fJ 2. Total Cover. % Bare Ground In Herb Stratum "—" ' Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: Total Number of Dominant Species Across Ail Strata: (S) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: / 00 (AB) I (A) Prevalence index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is s3.01 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Weiland Non -Vascular Plants' ._ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) IIndlcators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes tt No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast — DRAFT Verslon 9-15-2005 " SOIL Sampling Point: 2•-- Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm Depth Matrbc Redox Features • the absence of indicators.) Texture Remarks finches) Color (moist) °% Color (moist) °% Type' Looa '-- /6 -1' /041 ti S / 2 -- — — - i we 6'40.1 /04 PIA 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matmt. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3: T Histosol (A1) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) ` Stripped Matrbc (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Greyed Matrbc (F2) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick DarkSurface (Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface (FS) Sandy Mucky Mineral (81) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy,Gteyed Matrix (S4) -_ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer (if resent): Type: II /A Hydric Solt Present? Yes No +,•--- Depth (Inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology indicators: primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (NW coast) (B8) (C9) A) Surface Water (A1) _ WaterStalned Leaves (89) (except NW coast) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface High Water Table (A2) _ Salt Crust (B11) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhtzospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D4) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ FAC-Neutral Test (05) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ _ Other (Explain In Remarks) _ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No 1/ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 1. Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Reoorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast — DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region (DRAFT) A Or- :13rpleCt/Site: N t e A D -AP CitYfet`intY: ' 1\te..- 61.-0 1 VA t i:L1--4 ., - , Sampling Date: 1017-)0 Applicant/Owner: 6I'y-,:p..:r. Investigator(s): P.:P. / i...-717 SeCtion, ToWnShip, Range! -ri g N , 17--K C.' . C2. ( ( 12, PA) : Latkiforrn,(hIlisidpe,iprrace, etc.): T't --Nr7-4 tt Local relief (concave,: convex, none): ,..:1 ei 4 Slope Siope (/0): 3 - Subregion (LRk)c .11% (2.i-is_ t..., . l_at: Long: Datum: N I A Soll'iillap Drill Name: , .. NWI clastiiidatiOn: AM climatic / hydrelOgic-cotiditions on the site typical fhtthislIme of year? Yes ,- No (If no, explain in Re:nark%) _ Atp Vegetation ,.t.'1 , Sell -f`f or Hydrology -b./ :significantly dIstUrbedl Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ..."-- No Ate Vegetation I4 6611 I'd or Hydrology IV naturally prodblematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— AtteCh Site 410, showing sanliling pointic•Ceticris, transects, important features, etc HydrOphytio Vegetation Pre -Sent? Yes I.,' No liyOrld.Soll Present? 'Yes V N6 Wet,lerict Hydrology Present? Yes iJ No Remarks: Is the Sernpled Area St -ate: T. r.;) Sampling Point: CJI 'within a Wetland? Yes No VEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Use scientific names) % Cover species? ,Status 1. 3. 4. Rita! Cover: SaplingfSFinib Stratum ;1. 1124 . 2. 3. ,5. Total Cover: Herb Stratum. .6%4 t•;-, et. iArte, f\f .c&t,,, 2: .1.7) r 161f).1 V.4;1 el 1 i _A 5 IV 170 Lk," a ert 4 I, Atil-,etie e'-'es i:A67:7 Y.'S' I. N 4. • vt,' ; 5- 6 0 x-/ 5. PO iN,"..* 1,e1 I 6.,e1-4,11 1(3 N r4c; 6. 7. 8. ,Woody Vine Stratum 1. t-/ /A Total Ceveit: (') 2. Total CoVer: % Bate Ground in Herb Stratum Dominance Test worksheet: Ntimber of -Dominant Species That Are OBI_, FACVV, or FAC: I (A) Teta! Ntimber of Darnlhant SpecleS Across All Strata! (B) Percent of DpininalitSpedieS I 0 0 That Are opL, FACW, or FAG: (NB) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACVV species x 2 = FAC species x 3 =7- FACU species x 4 = UK species x 5 = ,Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = = liydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test Is >50% Prevalence Index Is 13.0' MotigIglogical Adaptations' (Provide Supporting data in Remarks.or en a seParate sheet) Wetland NonVascular PlantS' ptobleinatic Hydrophytid Vegetation (bcpiain) 'indicators of hydric soil and wetlarki hydrology must be present. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? •Yes 7, No Remarks: O./ p 47 (,,r, .1- 01,1 r.'s op, e /6 )3 up Ariny Corps Of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast - DRAFT Version 0-15-200 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm Depth Matra Redox Features • the absence of Indicators.) Texture Remarks (inches) Color (moist) °% Color (moist) °% Tyae1 Loc2 0 ^ 5 10 a7 /t z / / -- — " :5 41•1).9 c / 4 r2 Js k 44 5"/1)# /0(10 "-A 415 `rrtiOy/ts 5 C M satnhj /04nn • Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. Location: PL=Pore Uning, RC=Root Channel, M=Mattlx. Hydric Soli Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Histosoi (A1) ..Z Sandy Redox (S5) _ Histic Eplpedon (A2) ` Stripped Nlatrbc (S6) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matra (F2) Depleted Below bark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matra (F3) _ Thick bark Surface (Al2) ` Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ` Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrbt (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Salle: _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Red Parent Material (t F2) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: N A Hydric Soli Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (Inches): • Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators (any one Indicator is sufficient) Secondary indicators (2 or more required) Water -Stained Leaves (89) (NW coast) Concave Surface (BB) (810) Table (C2) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) (D4) (D5) (D6) (LRR A) ' _ Surface Water (A1) Z Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except NW coast) _ Sparsely Vegetated _ High Water Table (A2) _ Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns Saturation (A3) _ Aquatic invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position _ Drift Deposits (B3) ^ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Recent iron Reduction In Tilled Solis (C6) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks Iron Deposits (B5) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ FAGNeutral Test _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) _ Raised Ant Mounds _ . Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Field Observations; Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches); Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V'''' No Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No V Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), If available: Remarks: N hj em A %A ti0 iv "row, a T ivv ‘ • US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valleys and Coast — DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region (DRAFT) Project/Slte: M e e4 U AO City/County: I'll Cet'UI VA i14 Sampling Date: 10 i i / o g Applicant/Owner: At vrwl( State: Saripting Point: C "� Investigator(s): Pei/ L.-T Section, Township, Range: rr & N � 1 a' S l-• ) i v o ) Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 1'f-yv.r f...-e Locai relief (concave, convex, none): VI 14 f- Slope (%): a Subreglon (LRR): L t a r Lat: Long: Datum: <v f A Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes v ' No (If no, explain In Remarks.) Are Vegetation N , Soil fV , or Hydrologyi4 significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes, d!' No Are Vegetation „ 0 . Soli 14 or Hydrology V naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophyllc Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No ✓ Remarks: VEGETATION Tree Stratum! (Use scientific names.) Absolute °% Cover Dominant Indicator Soecles? Status DoininanceTest worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: 2 (A) 1. ti /A 2' Total Number of Dominant Species Across Ali Strata: 3 (B) 3. 4. Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAO: (AB) Total Cover. Saolino/Shrub Stratum 1. 14 /A Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Muifi* by: 2. 3, 08L species x 1 = 4, FACW species x 2 = 5, FAC species x 3 = Total Cover: Herb Stratum. % 'Re FACU species x 4 = 9 5 UPL species x 5 = 1, A f ry r t7 ram ( e4) l v, S Column Totals: (A) (B) 2.. 6 ✓il tlna a rV-cr+�rr. 20 11 •Rur Prevalence index = B/A = 3. C (0 0 .t.) f vrs Ita I A' r, h e t. "V N FA elij 4. CX-/."-'4 0 t 14 101 t, f t• 10 1 1131- Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators: _ Dominance Test Is >50°% _ Prevalence Index is %3.01 _ _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) — Wetland Non Vascular Plantss , _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetations (Explain) sindicators of hydric soli and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. Ca Ai c 714 ✓+e-- to /A if. C . , evi i r 5 N 0 ff � 6 7 8. Total Cover. Woody Vine Stratum IO 1. r/ / A 2. Total Cover. °% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum • da - Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No • Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast - DRAFT Version 9-15-2008 SOIL Sampling Point:- Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm Depth Matrix Redox Features the absence of indicators.) Texture Remarks finches) Color (moist) % Colorfmolst) % Type' Loc2 4- l® bl 0 2./ j -- _ .- 64 w1)4 %6 d K-, • Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Locatlon: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) HIstosoi (A1) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matra (F2) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ._ _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Sandy Gleyed Matra (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls': 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) alndlcators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: ti/A Hydric Soil Present? Yes No t^" Depth finches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators lane one indicator Is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Water Stained Leaves (139) (NW coast) Concave Surface (B8) (610) Table (C2) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) " (D4) (D5) (D5) (LRR A) ,_ Surface Water (A1) _ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except NW coast) _ Sparsely Vegetated _ High Water Table (A2) _ Saft Crust (611) _ Drainage Paftems _ Saturation (A3) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water _ Water Marks (51) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position _ Drift Deposits (63) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aqultard _ Afgai Mat or Crust (64) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di) (LRR A) _ FAC-Neutral Test _ Surface Soil Cracks (66) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Raised Ant Mounds _ inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (- Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): _V_ Saturation Present? Yes No { Depth (inches): (Includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast — DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region (DRAFT) Project/Site: 1‘4 c. e4-14 -AP Applicant/Owner: HV y;)6I4f • Investigator(s): Landform (hllislope, terrace, etc.); --emsu- Subieglon (LRR): i✓i (2-- C Soil Map Unit Name: Are climatio / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V Na (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are °Normal Circumstances' present? Yes ✓ No . (If needed, expiain any answers In Remarks.) City/County. M e_ & A � Nit% NI Sampling Date: f 0/1 g State: Sampling Point: /N.) f 1 Section, Township, Range: Tig N�f �° .RA-4 J Local relief (concave, convex, none): 1 e, I" Slope (°%): Long: Datum: /A Let: NW classification: Are Vegetation N , Soil N , or Hydrology td significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation N , Son N , or Hydrology tkii naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soli Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Remarks: ; t I, Yes No Yeah/ No Yes ✓ • No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) 1. N,,Y 2. 3. 4. Absolute Dominant indicator ° Cover Species? Status Total Cover. Sapling/Shrub Stratum 1. N /A 2. 3. 4. 5. Total Cover. Herb Stratum. 1. CA-i-G�r to 1" Yi'G,,, 1 4 (�., 1 0 y D ist•' 2' (3. -e r.,ti._ V1^ Aire e ti AliI vu.. .._5_ N plea 3. .. ►-ir Gvt_i n eV4 -444is i D N Fh -14 4. eTvrt /44 f tr'e .c 1 a S N f.A.41. / 5. CA 1 AAA a tr ii,� t'�..r 0.0 ma b 4,, ,ri I o N FA tit,/ 6. `i 7. Total Cover. Woodv Vine Stratum 1. WA' 2. Total Cover. °% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum "."- Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Dominance Test is >50°% _ Prevalence index is 53.01 Morphological Adaptationsr (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) rindlcators of hydrio soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Hydrophytic Vegetation Yes J No Present? Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast — DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: D J Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm Depth Matrix Redox Features • the absence of Indicators.) Texture Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvaer Loci (9— ro 18101P4 3'f a- _ _ _ Ct it ram- 4-4,-.45r.7 its -A ,, )6 `f" rZ crt /�k • 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. Hydric Soli Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrbr (S6) " Black Histic (A3) _ _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick DarkSurface (Al2) ` Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils9: _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) . 'indicators of hydrophytlo vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: a/A Hydric Soli Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (Inches): • Remarks: 1 & 6-7 6. I,-4-d-ow it ,1 fvt ,,t-a-i✓`7 1.4 kpi �e Sp 1 ) 't (;11, fr o-`-,, r (4)4 a in ,e,,,, i'1 HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator Is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required). Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (NW coast) Concave Surface (88) (310) Table (C2) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) (D4) (D5) (D6) (LRR A) •V Surface Water (A1) WaterStalned Leaves (69) (except NW coast) _ Sparsely Vegetated V. High Water Table (A2) _ Salt Cnrst (B11) _ Drainage Patterns i/ Saturation (A3) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water _ Water Marks (61) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position _ Drill Deposits (B3) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard _ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Solis (C6) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks _ iron Deposits (B5) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ FAC-Neutral Test _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) _ Raised Ant Mounds _ Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (B7) Field Observations: r, Surface Water Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes '/ No Depth (inches): (Includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valleys and Coast— DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region (DRAFT) Project/Site: Applicant/Owner i/� ► / Ovk ' State: Sampling Point: —22.- Investigator(s): 1=1 / t....f " Section, Township, Range: 11 g- Al R. T E . • S2 ! [ xxi) Landfonn (hliislope, terrace, etc.):, 1 d-,rrrt c..t. Local relief (concave, convex, none): VI ok &— Subregion (LRR): I, an_ E. Let: Long: Datum: !'=i k Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes sr- No (if no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation fs/ , Soil . N , or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are °Normal Circumstances' present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation N . Soli a , or Hydrology . N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. City/County: e I y Sampling Date: la /`Y I c Siope (%): Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes- ✓ - No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes • No is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No ___AL Remarks: �✓K! V A Somme b i Zvi, s. ti b..„ k VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names) 1. ref /A 2 3. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status 4. Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum 1. NIA 2. 3. 4. 5. Total Cover. Herb Stratum. 1. S.p`0-1-4d u, p Gx r11� to � � 4 6 �� 4 =A 1719 3. i rt li IX V IA ! A " -r 1 j NL 4. e -t, on A- c ro 1� IA yr ! t tm . I N 77ri I' 44/ 5. 6. 7. B. Total Cover. 1 S , Woody Vine Stratum 1. f./ e/A 2. Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 5 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: J (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across Ali Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ® (AB) Prevalence indexworksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species _ x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = fB) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Dominance Test is >50% „r Prevalence Index is s3.01 _ Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non Vascular Plants _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) °indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valleys and Coast — DRAFT Version 9-15-2008 SOIL Sampling Point: Z' Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm Depth Matrix Redox Features • the absence of indicators.) Texture Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type) Loc2 0-5 1019 R-s 12 _ -- -- re, pi:A, /6 i ri.,, .-"—/ (, # (oHR,S/ Z Rs' `/. S `t t Y / C i S G Fi Sp -A vz_44,ii J?.,,,l fed / '� ,.. , . • 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. Hydric Solt Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) _ Histosol (A1) ZSandy Redox (S5) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Black Hlstic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gteyed Matrbc (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrbc (F3) Thick DarkSurface (Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) r Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Sandy Gteyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ _ _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _. Red Parent Material (f'F2) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) alndlcators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: Al/741 Hydric Soil Present? Yes 7 No Depth (Inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators (anv one Indicator Is sufficient) Secondary indicators (2 or more required) Water -Stained Leaves (139) (NW coast) Concave Surface (B8) (610) Table (C2) on Aerial Imagery (09) (D2) (D3) (D4) (D5) (D6) (LRR A) Surface Water (A1) _ Water -Stained Leaves (39) (except NW coast) _ Sparsely Vegetated _ High Water Table (A2) _ Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns T Saturation (A3) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water Water Marks (81) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position _ Drift Deposits (83) ^ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks _ iron Deposits (B5) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ FAC-Neutral Test _ Surface Soli Cracks (B6) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Raised Ant Mounds Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (87) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ‘/ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No _Z____ Water Table Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspec ions), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valleys and Coast — DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region (DRAFT) Project/Site: At l L'c,.I1.4P Applicant/Owner: 14 i V tl, Xvirrv� investigator(s): P �` 7r Landform (hllistope, terrace, etc.): -r -1 rt, e n Subregion (LRR): t` ('a` 6 Soil Map Unit Name: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typicalforthis time of year? Yes t% N or Hydrology 1 significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation t\i , Soil N . or Hydrology, ti _ naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Lat: City/County: kteed4 VA if ea Sampling Date: 10 /7 /08 ) • State: 1 L.) Sampling Point: R 1 Section, Township, Range: -ng N 11.-•'g C. S z I t frIA Local relief (concave, convex, none): P i a 11 . Slope (°%): 06-- Long: Datum: N / A MM classification: Are Vegetation N ,soli No Of no, explain In Remarks.) Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes t - No Of needed, explain any answers In Remarks.) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydrlc Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Remarks: Yes t/ No Yes _ No Yeses_- No is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ti No VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) 1. N/A- 2. 3. 4. Total Cover. Absolute Dominant Indicator °% Cover- Species? Status Saptlno/Shrub Stratum 1. tcf/4 2. 3. 4. 5. Total Cover. Herb Stratum. pep pea N fAc 1. (-es teps.cepir i0 -- 3. CO t e-s eiCk kg ir arta 41 a 9 4 'AO [ .10 y pyit V.i'v 7_4 8. f s fe / s+ a eel � Y . -r N sagc . M Vd p to r ® r9 f Grcf Total Cover. / a / Ot) rAc Woody Vine Stratum 1. IN/ /4 5. FJ tro S' fx 5 ' 2. Total Cover. °% Bare Ground In Herb Stratum-er Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAO: Total Number of Dominant Species Across Ali Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) (B) l CO (AB) Prevalence index worksheet: Total °% Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1= FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test Is >50°% Prevalence Index Is.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' _ Problematic Hydrophytlo Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydrlc soil and wetland hydrology must be present Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: pi 6v. r US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valleys and Coast — DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm Depth Matrbc Redox Features • the absence of indicators.) Texture Remarks (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoel Loot 2-. g. -44 ¢ !O it 12. s/ 7 q 0 7.5'12 41-/4 ID C.- II Cel-A.,stet toA� 5,, i-# w r • Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrbt. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LR s, unless otherwise noted.) _ HIstosol (A1) ZSandy Redox (85) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (66) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Minerat (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) r Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox park Surface (F6) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (31) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrbc (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8) indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis°: _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain In Remarks) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetatlon and wetland hydrology must be present Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: r4/A HydHa Soil Present? Yes V No Depth (inches): • Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (anyone Indicator Is sufficient) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Water -Stained Leaves (89) (NW coast) _ Surface Water (A1) _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except NW coast) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) l Egh Water Table (A2) _ Salt Crust (B11) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Sediment Deposits (B2) — Oxidized Ridzospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (02) Drift Deposits (B3) ^ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Recent Iron Reduction 1n Tilled Solis (C6) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D4) Iron Deposits (B5) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) FAC-Neutrat Test (D5) _ Surface Soli Cracks (B6) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No V Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes V No Water Table Present? Yes �f No it Depth (inches): i -S _ Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 12.- __ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspec ions), If available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast — DRAFT Version 9-15-2008 ProJect/Site: tecv 4P Applicant/Owner: Investigator(s): Pam+" WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Westem Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region (DRAFT) City/County: 1 vtC -4,, ii 4 Idte) Sampling Date: I 7fOgr State: TO Sampling Point: Section, Township, Range: `1tl/ et iv p.--% 1424 M) Local relief (concave, convex, none): Fif ea Slope (%): Long: Datum: W / A Landform (hillstope, terrace, etc.): "ram �* Subregion (LRR): LA e Soli Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes tee- No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Let: Are Vegetation Soil Ar , or Hydrologyly significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No Are Vegetation ti , Soil , or Hydrology A( naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No V , Hydric Soil Present? Yes No V Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes • No 17. Remarks: gIt. . n 1, Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No VEGETATION Tree Stratum' (Use scientific names.) 1. wbe 2. 3. 4. Saolino/Shrub Stratum' 1. n/!A 2. 3. 4. 5. Absolute Dominant indicator % Cover Soectes . Status Total Cover. Herb Stratum. 1. 2.. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Total Cover. Ca HQ alw$ iS' S -At.io <. e. 40 A st 8. Total Cover. P • r-e-tp.ertir y rti y N — N FA c. r N y_ Dominance Testworksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAD: 0 01' ! (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAO: 2. er 5 0 (AB) Prevatence index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Muitioly bv: OBL species x 1= FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index =13/A = (B) 90 Woody Vine Stratum 1. B4 r4 2. Total Cover. % Bare Ground In Herb Stratum Q' Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% _ Prevalence index is.0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No if — Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valleys and Coast - DRAFT Version 9-15-2005 SOIL Sampling Point: 67- Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm Depth Matrix Redox Features • the absence of Indicators.) Texture Remarks (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tveei Loot tr'" + S H 10 Pio l /q - _ _ - v411.J � i fli roi s �oi if A ai Jim . • • Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, tut=Matrix. Hydric Soli Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis': . Histosol (A1) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Hiatic Eplpedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Hlstic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ` Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84) -^ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: VIA Hydric Soil Present? Yes No e-'''''..- • Depth (inches): Remarks: . i26-74.. 0 i 3 „ HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators (arty one Indicator is sufficient) Secondary indicators (2 or more reculred) Water -Stained Leaves (89) (NW coast) Concave Surface (BB) (B10) Table (C2) on Aerial Imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) . (D4) (D5) (D6) (LRR A) Surface Water (A1) _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except NW coast) _ Sparsely Vegetated High Water Table (A2) ^ Salt Crust (811) ^ Drainage Patterns Saturation (A3) _ Aquatic invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water _ Water Marks (Bi) ^ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Saturation Visible _ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position _ Drift Deposits (B3) ` Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent tron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ^ Frost -Heave Hummocks Iron Deposits (B5) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ FAC-Neutrat Test Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) _ Raised Ant Mounds inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No V Depth (Inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No V Water Table Present? Yes No d Depth (Inches): Saturation Present? Yes No / Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), ((available: Remarks: Rd+anic ctit., aye Zar D f t ,y.. d4,-, US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast — DRAFT Verston 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region (DRAFT) ProJect/Site: eot.•t4 AP Applicant/Owner. investigator(s): P6Z / L T Landform (hllislope, terrace, etc.): t-Lo-V troi r z. Subregion (LRR): E Lat: City/County: 1‘.14 eltA4 irk 0.€1 Sampling Date: I. /i /0g State: 3..0 Sampling Point: E 3 Section, Township, Range: 11 t ( Rl 6 $ 2 / t'. IN) Local relief (concave, convex, none): f 1 42-+ Slope (%): 'e' Long: Datum: N to Soil Map Unit Name: NW classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (if no, explain In Remarks.) Are Vegetation N . son N , or Hydrology (_ significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes ✓ No Are Vegetation / J , Soil N . or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _�� No Yes No Yes • No ✓r Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No \, Remarks: VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) 1. N 2. 3. 4. Total Cover. Absolute Dominant Indicator °% Cover Species? Status Saoilna/Shrub Stratum 1. N/A 2. 3. 4. 5. Total Cover. Herb Stratum. 1. 'fLr-� etc, 1-," if; ; (44.r 3. �n-� x ti4.4 Z-vs 0 'fy e\ 4. Pt) I"/ a..1•-r..1,4• real e-- f t 4� 5. �L/Y+ GIBS" r.--egat .>' r'i s. nvu p� ri c 7. B. _ j, — Ay e S .J_; N zo y i 0 N Fee Total Cover: r S Woody Vine Stratum 1. W PE 2. Total Cover. °% Bare Ground In Herb Stratum 1 S" Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAO: (A) Species Across Aft Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 00 (NM Total Number of Dominant Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °% Cover of: MUltipiV bv: OBL species x 1= FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators: Dominance Test Is >50°% _ Prevalence Index Is .0' _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydrlc soil and wetland hydrology must be present. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 1 No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast - DRAFT Version 9-15-200S SOiL Sampling Point Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm Depth Matrix Redox Features • the absence of indicators.) Remarks !inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) Type' Loci _2A_ --Te-lure 0- $ Ioya x /2- ...' .... .. "V,el /a-ltkt , p3.,-./611- /O 4 i SY `- , - ._ e cretta.) -1-- gyi4 br,,/ 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion1RM=Reduced Matrix. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis: _ Histosol (A1) _ Sandy Redox (86) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Hisao Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrbx (86) _ Red Parent Material (rF2) _ Black Hlstio (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted DarkSurface (F7) 3indlcators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soli Present? Yes No V Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology indicators: Primary Indicators (any one indicator Is sufficient) Secondanr indicators (2 or more reaulredZ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (NW coast) Concave Surface (B8) (B10) Table (C2) on Aerial imagery (C9) (D2) (D3) (D4) (D5) (D6) (LRR A) Surface Water (A1) _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except NW coast) _ Sparsely Vegetated _ High Water Table (A2) _ Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns _ Saturation (A3) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water _ Water Marks (81) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible _ Sediment Deposits (B2) ^ Oxidized Rhizospheres along living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position _ Drift Deposits (83) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquifard _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks _ iron Deposits (65) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ FAC-Neutral Test _ Surface Soil Cracks (66) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Raised Ant Mounds Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (B7) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No V Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: N O S",, fy sn,41'G,,i-- 14 p US Army Corps of Engineers Westem Mountains, Valleys and Coast -- DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Westem Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region (DRAFT) City/County: / l 1 G V� Sampling Date: 67F State: 1 � Sampling Point: 1~ 1 i' �,,, Section, Township, Range: Local relief (concave, convex, none): Rm.- Slope (%): • Long: Datum: IV !A NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain In Remarks.) Are Vegetation, � . Soil iI , or Hydrology � significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes V No Are Vegetation ti , Soil 14 , or Hydrology � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Project/Site: 1' dAt Applicant/Owner: tsre investigator(s): U� T Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):TOMAACIZ Subregion (LRR): Soil Map Unit Name: Lat: Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ti No Hydric Soli Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes V No Remarks: tMib1 � C..6?to !.'may / V tvb . r'V 1, 14. � •�i�i tse't jai . 14),r'. Flaws. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names) Absolute °% Cover Dominant Indicator Species? Status Dorinance Testworksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAO: % (A) 1. 1°,/ ) A 2. Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: / (B) 3. 4. Percent of Dominant Species 01 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAO: (AB) SapHnglShrub Stratum Total Cover. 1. IV ! A Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Muf 1ply bv: 2. 3. OBL species x 1= 4. FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species x 3 = Herb Stratum. Total Cover f e FACU species x 4 = s UPL species x 5 = 1. ,, „I/4,r i W .i, sp. Column Totals: (A) (B) 2.. �ir+ lt.4 .i %,r 1 ,614 r 60 `✓ }FA 7` AZ14 Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. P 0 ,,, ii li tft O YZcc•. (i r 0 M FAG 4. !Af,s, to (C-1�, r -�-n 44 r-r /\/ ..F.A4 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Dominance Test is >50°% _ Prevalence index Is s3.0/ _ Morphological Adaptations/ (Provide supporting data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) -- Wetland Non -Vascular Plants/ _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain) /indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present pb 5. U R b/ p .1A,, e A. r-i IA 1— Af is p t_ 11,4-41 6 7 S. Woody Vine stratum Total Cover. 1 /VA 2. °% Bare Ground in Herb Stratum / S Total Cover. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast — DRAFT Version 9-15-2006 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO APPENDIX C SITE PHOTOGRAPHS WHP Project 34256 12 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO Photo 1: Area 2, Wetland and Irrigation Ditch Photo 2: Area 1, Drainage Ditch, Culvert Connecting Under Runway WHP Project 34256 13 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO Photo 3: Area 2, Irrigation Ditch at End of Runway Photo 4: Area 1, Main Drainage Ditch WHP Project 34256 14 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO Photo 5: Area 2, Irrigation Ditch and Wetland Photo 6: Area 1, Main Drainage Ditch WHP Project 34256 15 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO Photo 7: Area 6A, Drift from High Water in Drainage Ditch Photo 8: Area 6A, Driftwood in Drainage Ditch WHP Project 34256 16 t • DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO Photo 9: Area 6B, Non -Wetland Part of Drainage Ditch Photo 10: Area 7, Irrigation Ditch, Culvert under Runway WHP Project 34256 17 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO Photo 11: Area 7, Irrigation Ditch -=- Photo 12: Area 8, Drainage Ditch WHP Project 34256 18 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO Photo 13: Area 9, Intermittent Stream Photo 14: Areas 8 and 9, Stream, Drainage Ditch and Culvert WHP Project 34256 19 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO O \-111 • z_t 4.1 - •• 0, Photo 15: Area 8, Annual Hydrophytes in Drainage Ditch Photo 16: Area 8, Algal Crust Hydrology Indicator in Drainage Ditch WHP Project 34256 20 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO Photo 17: Area 11, Snow Storage/Detention Basin Standpipe Photo 18: Area 11, Snow Storage/Detention Basin, Stormwater Outfall WHP Project 34256 21 DELINEATION OF WETLANDS AND OTHER WATERS MCCALL AIRPORT, MCCALL, IDAHO Photo 19: Area 12, Non -Wetland Drainage Ditch, Isolated WHP Project 34256 22 RE VED John Anderson, A.A.E City of McCall 216 E Park Street McCall, ID 83638 Project: McCall Airport Environmental Assessment City of McCall Task Order No 1; 8 Amendment No. 1 To Task Order No. 1 Professional Services July 6, 2009 Through August 23, 2009 WHPacI6e September 9, 2009 Project No. 34256 Invoice No 34256-08 Task Original Budget CA No. 1 Total Budget % Comp. Total To Date Remaining Previous Invoices Current Invoice 1000 - Project Administration $ 12,194.69 $12,194.69 100% $12,160.12 $ 34.57 $12,160.12 $0.00 0100 - Initial Public Inv 8 Scoping $ 17,859.26 $17,859.26 100% $17,855.11 $ 4.15 $17,855.11 $0.00 0200 - Data Collection Affected Env $ 28,993.55 $28,993.55 100% $28,990.26 $ 3.29 $28,990.26 $0.00 0300 - Dev of Env Consequences Section $ 53,528.69 $53,528.69 42% $22,554.55 $ 30,974.14 $16,450.08 $6,104.47 0303 - Subconsultant Tom Duebendorfer $ 6,776.00 $ 6,776.00 89% $6,006.00 $ 770.00 $6,006.00 $0.00 0312 - Subconsultant Haz Mat Kleinfelder $ 8,250.00 $ 8,250.00 0% $0.00 $ 8,250.00 $0.00 $0.00 0313 - Subconsultant SWCA $ 21,835.00 $21,835.00 93% $20,256.78 $ 1,578.22 $18,478.90 $1,777.88 0400 -Env Permitting &Mitigation ` $ 35,530.00 $35,530.00 1% $502.27 $ 35,027.73 $485.02 $17.25 0402 - Subconsultant Mountain States / Clearwater l $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 0% $0.00 $ 7,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 0500 - Preliminary Engineering $ 46,760.61 $46,760.61 100% $46,756.26 $ 4.35 $46,756.26 $0.00 0512 - Subconsultant Geo Kleinfelder $ 13,145.00 $13,145.00 99% $13,003.32 $ 141.68 $13,003.32 $0.00 0600 - NIDGS Survey $ $ 4,261.17 $ 4,261.17 19% $814.59 $ 3,446.58 $814.59 $0.00 9990 - Reimbursable Expenses $ 20,759.80 $ 284.55 $21,044.35 91% $19,151.84 $ 1,892.51 $17,910.40 $1,241.44 Total $ 273,332.60 $ 4,545.72 $277,878.32 68% $188,051.10 $89,827.22 $178,910.06 $9,141.04 Subscribed this 9th day of September, 2 Rainse E. Anderson, PE Project Manager Remit To: WHPacific, Inc. 9755 SW Barnes Road, Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97225 it* tc — it.Ec- �l .'t4 9755 SW Barnes Road, Suite 300 • Portland, OR 97225 • T 503.626.0455 • F 503.526.0775 • www.whpacific.com PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES OUTLAY REPORT AND REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS (See tnmuyiav rn h j 3. FEDERAL SPONSORING AGENCY AND ORGANIZATIONAL ELEMENT TO WHICH THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 6 EMPLOYEE DEMhICATON NUMBER 82-60000223 9. RECIPIENT ORGANIZATION 7. RECIPIENT ACCOUNT OR OTHER DENrFYWG NUMBER None: McCall Municipal Airport No. And Street City,: State and Zip Cod 216 East Park Street McCall, ID 83638 Approved by Office of Management Budget, No. 80-R0181 1. TYPE OF REQUEST D FINAL X PARTIAL 4. FEDERAL GRANT OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER ASSIGNED BY FEDERAL AGENGY 3-16-0023-18 2. BASIS OF REQUEST X CASH ❑ ACCRUAL 5. PARTIAL PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 1 $90,611.000 PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT FROM (Month, day, year) 716/09 TO (Month day, year) 9"9/09 10. PAYEE (Where check should be sent rfdferent that item 9) Name: Na. And Street Gty,: State and Zip Code 11. STATUS OF FUNDS CLASSIFICATION PROGRAMS - FUNCTIONS - ACTIVITIES (a) Previous (b) Current (c) TOTAL a. Administrative expense $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ $ 0.00 b. Preliminary expense c. Land, structures, right-of-way d. Architectural engineering basic fees 0.00 8,756.11 8,756.11 e. Other architectural engineering fees f. Project Inspection fees 0.00 0.00 0.00 g. Land development h. Relocation expense I. Relocation payments to individuals and businesses j. Demolition and removal k. Construction and project improvement cost 0.00 0.00 0.00 I. Equipment m. Miscellaneous Cost n. Total cumulative to date (sum of lines a thru m) 0.00 8,756.11 8,756.11 o. Deductions for program income p. Net cumulative to date (Line n minus line o) 0.00 8,756.11 8,756.11 q. Federal share to date 0.00 8,318.00 8,318.00 r. Rehabilitation grants (100 % reimbursement) s. Total Federal share (sum of lines q and r) 0.00 8,318.00 8,318.00 t. Federal payment previously requested 0.00 0.00 0.00 u. Amount requested for reimbursement $ 0.00 $ 8,318.00 $ $ 8,318.00 v. Percentage of physical completion of project 0 % 9 % 9 12. Certification I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief the billed costs or disbursements are in accordance with the terms of the project and that the reimbursement represents the Federal a. RECIPIENT Signa oriz d Certifying Official Date Report Submitted 9/22109 T o Prl ame and Title ' J n Anderson, Airport Manager Telephone (AC & Number) 208-634 488 share due which has not been previously requested and that an inspection has been performed and all work is in accordance with the terms of the award b. Representative certifying to line 11v. S n ur Au prized Certifying Official gned / L��/% T ed rin a and Title John Anderson, Airport Manager T leph a (AC6 umber) -1488 I Condensed Standard Form 271 (7-76) Prescribed by Office of Management and Budget WHPacific PROJECT STATUS REPORT Client: John Anderson, Airport Manager Project: McCall Airport Environmental Assessment Project No: 034256 PSR No: 008 (07-21-2009 thru 09-14-2009) Date: September 14, 2009 From: • Rainse Anderson, P.E. Project Manager Distribution: US Mail and E-Mail PROJECT STATUS: WHPacific has: • Coordinated between FAA and City regarding City Council discussions • Prepared a memorandum to City Council with follow-up responses from June 5 Council meeting WORK TO BE COMPLETED NEXT PERIOD: WHPacific will: • Assist the City of McCall in selecting a Preferred Alternative, whether by providing additional information or attending a follow-up public meeting. • Finalize alternatives chapter, after City Council selects a Preferred Alternative. • Complete the environmental consequences chapter once alternatives chapter is finalized. • Prepare wetlands functional assessment once a preferred alternative is selected. ACTION REOUI RED: Item: Description: Action Req'd By: Action Req'd Date. Completed Date: 1 Assist City Council in selection of Preferred Alternative WHP As requested by City Council 2 Finalize alternatives chapter WHP After Preferred Alternative is selected 3 Complete environmental consequences chapter WHP Three weeks after completion of alternatives chapter 4 Prepare wetlands functional assessment WHP After Preferred Alternative is selected C: Documents and SettingsirandersonlLocal SettingslTemporary Internet Files\COntent.Outlook\5GIFOFEY\PSR #8.doc September 14, 2009 S.• ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS )10Go Green! We accept ACH payments Routing# 071922777 Account# 7811583501 Business Checking Account: Remit to: First American Bank P.O. Box 92170 Notification: payment@swca.com Elk Grove, IL 60009 602.274.3831 RECEIVED To: W&H Pacific 9755 SW Bames Road JUL 2 0 2�9 Suite 300 Portland OR 97225 � _� Attention: Sarah Lucas 1{/jj�/' iFi CIF I Invoice Invoice No : Date : Contract Maximum : Total To Date: Prev Billing Amount: Invoice Amount: Period Ending: 15072-004 July 21, 2009 $19,850.00 $18,415.25 $16,799.00 $1,616.25 07/04/2009 Project : 15072. - McCall Airport Environmental Assessment Manager: Stephanie T Butler Particulars Current Billing Services for period ending 2009-JUL-04 Project No. 34256 TO No. 8 McCall Airport Environmental Assessment Professional Services Labor Cultural Resources Spec VII Cultural Resources Spec III GIS/CADD Specialist III Technical Writer / Editor II 7.50HR @ $115.00 / HR = $862.50 7.25HR @ $75.00 / HR = $543.75 1.50HR @ $75.00 / HR = $112.50 1.50HR @ $65.00 / HR = $97.50 Total: Labor 1,616.25 Total: Professional Services 1,616.25 Expenses Lodging 0.00 Materials and Supplies 0.00 Per Diem 0.00 Travel 0.00 Total: Expenses 0.00 Total: McCall Airport Environmental Assessment 1,616.25 INVOICE TOTAL 1,616.25 VENDOH # 01'' �131� INV DATE -7 a -I /09 INV # J — 004- AMOUNT 24- PROJ/TASK c3tt 2(• c3i3 ACCT I-2---0l(—N ORG r1 APPROVED �'�-;� 2 ' ? VOUCHER Project Number 15072. SW-POR Page 1 of 1 INVOICE TO: Ms. Sarah Lucas Aviation Planner WH Pacific, Inc. 9755 SW Barnes Rd., Suite 300 Portland, OR 97225 FROM: ac YInsen 3407 Fairoaks Circle Caldwell, Idaho 83605 SSN 518-48-7278 DATE: 17 June 2009 RE: Survey for Northem Idaho Ground Squirrels, Proposed taxiway relocation project, aN t�rpbrt Description of work: Survey for northern Idaho ground squirrels and their burrows or other signs of activity along the route of the proposed taxiway relocation, and write report. Dates of work: 10 December 2008 - bid preparation 05 June 2009 - field survey 17 June 2009 - report preparation Itemization: ITEM AMOUNT 1. Bid preparation - 0.4 hours @ $60 2. Field survey (2.5 hours) and travel to site - 5.1 hours @ $60/hr 3. Report preparation - 1.3 hours ® $60/hr 4. Mileage - 235.6 miles round trip @ $0.55/mile TOTAL $24.00 456.00 78.00 129.58 Please send payment to the address above. Thank you. Sincerely, Eric Ye sen, Ph.D. Professor of Biology VkNook avq--00157 Di 0 iNV EAt-E 6411 /fl INV # '1 "1- 0; AMOUNT ( -1. -P PROJ/TASK D2 . qtq qo ACCT I7--017-FI ORO 9. 6i .13.1 APPROVED BY DATE /5L o • VOUCHER # z, i ` VYl.Paclf c EMPLOYEE EXPENSE REPORT Employee Name Employee No. Week Ending Office Business Line Sarah Lucas G00008590 6/7/09 PDX 115 r Swature Supeor Signature 07/22/09 Oate% / Dale' / 3 /( Q/ Date Location (city, state) Project Name OR Office and Business Line Project Number and Task Number GL Account Number Cg D m v A Ali -Travel B Ground Transportation C Lodging D Per Dlem Meals E Actual{ Expense Meals F Business Meals r Entertainment G Miscellaneous H Total of Columns A-G $0.00 50.00 _ -f $0.00 s0.00 $0.00 $0.00 6/4/09-6/5/09 . ya.xrasr�wJc'rM� McCall Ct of lUlcCall 'k�� a: 209.034256.9900 >�, Clie f G $126.50 3105.45 $30.85 $0.00 .,.., ...._� a 5262.60 - $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 $0,00 Total $0.00 $126.50 $105.45 $30.65 50.00 r $0.00_ $0.00 $0.00 $262.60 Date Purpose of Trip $262.60 Leas Employee Advancee Employer Advance Number 3/4/09 McCall -6/5/09 EA. NIDGS survey and City Council meeting Amount Due Employee OR (Amount Due WHPaclfic, Inc.) $262.60 I CADocurnents and Settings\Sarah Lucasllvly Documenta1PDX Hard DrivelRelmbursemenl forms1Mlse Expenses May 09 - Jul 09.xta Expense Report Detail. Enter all company reimbursable expenses . Carry the totals to page one. Receipts must be included for all expenditures over $25.00. g . GrourudTransgortation (Cab fares car rentals, road tolls parking, etc.) Date item 6 = Ground Transportation (Personal vehicle mileage) rrom r aB01 06/04/0 06/05/09 IIAYL Cost ( 115. Frcrn From ( From From From I `MYL To i3Oi 115 ., ) rt111V r To ) miles $ , ( 0.550 ) To ) miles @ $ . ( 0.550 ) To miles © S . 0.550 ) 3:25s ' 0.00 0.00 0.00 miles S . To 0.550 0.00 D e. E -.Personal Meals white Traveling (Include tax 8 gratuity)' Data Departure & Return Time Dally M&1E Rate Breakfast Lunch Dinner Cost 06/04/09 3/4/09 - 6/5/0 06/05/09 3/4/09 - 6/5/0 35.00 35.00 15.43 15.22 $15.22 15.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 G - Nlisce laneous Expense Detail (Please be specific) Date Rem Total $30.65 Cost Total $126 50 :. .r f. eS.S. •'•--ry.4?. ��!. �, �i'- t. �'�� •+,'$.ay`4to44-.l,c'.. . rt°tk' '" �'.�::.. •. .: .:. Ieusmess�Meals/Entertaiament'Detair(Please be'specific ..Should not include the cast of the traveler's lodging, meals or incidentals.) Purpose (Please be specltic) Date Attendees r Guests Total $0.00 Cost C lJocuments and Settings1Sarah Lucas\My Documents\PDX Hard Drive1Relmbursement formslMisc Expenses May 09 - Jul 09.xls Total $0.00 '3kko inn EXPRESS` HOTEL &SUITES 06-05-09 Parker Lucas 10243 Sw Eastridge St Portland, OR 97225-5001 US Folio No. A/R Number Group Code Company Membership No. : PC 505479179 Invoice No. Room No. : 337 Arrival : 06-04-09 Departure : 06-05-09 Conf. No. : 67696662 Rate Code : 1DDSR Page No. 1 of 1 Date 1 Description Charges Credits 06-04-09 06-04-09 06-04-09 'Room Sales Tax Tax Orcirpancy Thank you for staying at Holiday Inn Express Hotel d Suites McCall. Qualifying points for this stay will automatically be credited to your account. To make additional reservations online, update your account information or view your statement please visit www. priorityclub.com. We look forward to welcoming you back soon. Total 95.00 5.70 4.75 105.45 0.00 Glance _.105.45, Guest Signature: I have received the goods and / or services in the amount shown heron. I agree that my liablity for this bill is not waived and agree to be held personally liable in the event that the indicated person, company, or associate fails to pay for any part or the full amount of these charges. If a credit card charge, I further agree to perform the obligations set forth in the cardholder's agreement with the issuer. 210 N. Third Street McCall, ID 83638 Telephone: (208) 634-4700 Fax: (208) 634-4750 www.thehuntlodge.com P ' MY FATHER'S PLACE 901 N 3PD ICCALL. JD 8300 208/634-4401 tier chant ID: 009200125673 Tern ID: 601 VISA 6444s Inv 1: Pori �lli RVS Code; IMP: Oak .0 Sale Ref N: 033 Ellin lirthod: SmiPed 19:122 APPr Cock. t5656 Batfhn: Customer Coav THAW YOU MCCALL BREWING C0MPA 807 N 3RD ST MCCALL, ID. 83638 TERMINAL 1.D.: 88173488::::1447484882 MERCHANT 1: 8881447464 * ***********2302 SRO 88 SALE [ECHO 1: 2 INV: 000002 DWI JUN 15: 19 TIME: 18:63 BATCH: 674 BASE 7IP eiti AL AUTH: 315088 #13.43 2- '43 SARAN LUCAS 1 ADREE 10 PAY ABODE TOTAL AMOUNT ACCORDING TO CARD ISSUER CAREEVENT (MERCHANT AOREEMENI IF CREDIT VOUCHER) CUSTOMER COPY r John Anderson, A.A.E City of McCall 216 E Park Street McCall, ID 83638 Project: McCall Airport Environmental Assessment City of McCall Task Order No. 1; & Amendment No. 1 To Task Order No. 1 Professional Services September 13, 2010 Through September 30, 2010 INHPacilic November 3, 2010 Project No. 34256 Invoice No: 34256-17A Task Original Budget CA No. 1 Total Budget % Comp. Total To Date Remaining Previous Invoices Current Invoice 1000 - Project Administration $ 12,194.69 $ 12,194.69 100% $12,160.12 $ 34.57 $12,160.12 $0.00 0100 - Initial Public Inv & Scoping $ 17,859.26 $ 17,859.26 100% $17,855.11 $ 4.15 $17,855.11 $0.00 0200 - Data Collection Affected Env $ 28,993.55 $ 28,993.55 100% $28,990.26 $ 3.29 $28,990.26 $0.00 0300 - Dev of Env Consequences Section $ 53,528.69 $ 53,528.69 119% $63,904.14 $ (10,375.45) $63,904.14 $0.00 0303 - Subconsultant Tom Duebendorfer $ 6,776.00 $ 6,776.00 89% $6,006.00 $ 770.00 $6,006.00 $0.00 0312 - Subconsultant Haz Mat Kleinfelder $ 8,250.00 $ 8,250.00 0% $0.00 $ 8,250.00 $0.00 $0.00 0313 - Subconsultant SWCA $ 21,835.00 $ 21,835.00 100% $21,759.66 $ 75.34 $21,759.66 $0.00 0400 - Env Permitting & Mitigation $ 35,530.00 $ 35,530.00 39% $13,719.24 $ 21,810.76 $11,370.48 $2,348.76 0402 - Subconsultant Mountain States / Clearwater $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 0% $0.00 $ 7,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 0500 - Preliminary Engineering $ 46,760.61 $ 46,760.61 100% $46,756.26 $ 4.35 $46,756.26 $0.00 0512 - Subconsultant Geo Kleinfelder $ 13,145.00 $ 13,145.00 99% $13,003.32 $ 141.68 $13,003.32 $0.00 0600 - NIDGS Survey $ - $ 4,261.17 $ 4,261.17 19% $814.59 $ 3,446.58 $814.59 $0.00 9990 - Reimbursable Expenses $ 20,759.80 $ 284.55 $ 21,044.35 104% $21,956.73 $ (912.38) $21,879.23 $77.50 Total $ 273,332.60 $ 4,545.72 $277,878.32 89% $246,925.43 $30,952.89 $244,499.17 $2,426.26 Subscribed this 3rd day of November, 2010 Rainse . nderson, PEC— Project Manager Remit To: WHPacific, Inc. 9755 SW Barnes Road, Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97225 9755 SW Barnes Road, Suite 300 • Portland, OR 97225 • 503.626.0455 • 503.526.0775 • www.whpacific.com f WHPacific John Anderson, A.A.E City of McCall 216 E Park Street McCall, ID 83638 November 3, 2010 Project No. 34256 Invoice No: 34256-17A INVOICE Project: McCall Airport Environmental Assessment City of McCall Task Order No. 1; & Amendment No. 1 To Task Order No. 1 Consultant Project Lead: Rainse Anderson, PE Professional Services September 13, 2010 Through September 30, 2010 TASK 0400 - Environmental Permitting and Mitigation Professional Personnel Name Flours Rate Amount Anderson, Rainse E. 9.00 194.61 $ 1,751.49 Archibald, Aaryn M. 2.25 69.00 $ 155.25 Lucas, Sarah M. 1.50 75.54 $ 113.31 Quarterman, Philip J. 2.75 119.53 $ 328.71 Total Labor 15.50 TASK 9990 - Reimbursable Expenses Technology Charges Total 15.50 @ $ 5.00 $ 77.50 $ 2,348.76 77.50 Total This Invoice $ 2,426.26 Billings to Date Current 2,426.26 Total Authorized Budget $ 277,878.32 Prior 244,499.17 Remaining Authorized Budget for this Task Order $ 30,952.88 Billings to Date 246,925.43 John Anderson, A.A.E City of McCall 216 E Park Street McCall, ID 83638 Project: McCall Airport Environmental Assessment City of McCall Task Order No. 1; & Amendment No. 1 To Task Order No. 1 Professional Services October 1, 2010 Through October 17, 2010 INHPacific November 3, 2010 Project No. 34256 Invoice No: 34256-17B Task Original Budget CA No. 1 Total Budget % Comp. Total To Date Remaining Previous Invoices Current Invoice 1000 - Project Administration $ 12,194.69 $ 12,194.69 100% $12,160.12 $ 34.57 $12,160.12 $0.00 0100 - Initial Public Inv & Scoping $ 17,859.26 $ 17,859.26 100% $17,855.11 $ 4.15 $17,855.11 $0.00 0200 - Data Collection Affected Env $ 28,993.55 $ 28,993.55 100% $28,990.26 $ 3.29 $28,990.26 $0.00 0300 - Dev of Env Consequences Section $ 53,528.69 $ 53,528.69 119% $63,904.14 $ (10,375.45) $63,904.14 $0.00 0303 - Subconsultant Tom Duebendorfer $ 6,776.00 $ 6,776.00 89% $6,006.00 $ 770.00 $6,006.00 $0.00 0312 - Subconsultant Haz Mat Kleinfeider $ 8,250.00 $ 8,250.00 0% $0.00 $ 8,250.00 $0.00 $0.00 0313- Subconsultant SWCA $ 21,835.00 $21,835.00 100% $21,759.66 $ 75.34 $21,759.66 $0.00 0400 - Env Permitting & Mitigation $ 35,530.00 $ 35,530.00 49% $17,446.10 $ 18,083.90 $13,719.24 $3,726.86 0402 - Subconsultant Mountain States / $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 0% $0.00 $ 7,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 _Clearwater 0500 - Preliminary Engineering $ 46,760.61 $ 46,760.61 100% $46,756.26 $ 4.35 $46,756.26 $0.00 0512 - Subconsultant Geo Kleinfelder $ 13,145.00 $ 13,145.00 99% $13,003.32 $ 141.68 $13,003.32 $0.00 0600 - NIDGS Survey $ - $ 4,261.17 $ 4,261.17 19% $814.59 $ 3,446.58 $814.59 $0.00 9990 - Reimbursable Expenses $ 20,759.80 $ 284.55 $ 21,044.35 108% $22,818.00 $ (1,773.65) $21,956.73 $861.27 Total $ 273,332.60 $ 4,545.72 $277,878.32 91% $251,513.56 $26,364.76 $246,925.43 $4,588.13 Subscribed this 3rd day of November, 20 ?ice Rainse E. Anderson, PE Project Manager Remit To: WHPacific, Inc. 9755 SW Barnes Road, Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97225 9755 SW Barnes Road, Suite 300 • Portland, OR 97225 • 503.626.0455 • 503.526.0775 • www.whpacific.com WHPacific John Anderson, A.A.E City of McCall 216 E Park Street McCall, ID 83638 November 3, 2010 Project No. 34256 Invoice No: 34256-17B INVOICE Project: McCall Airport Environmental Assessment City of McCall Task Order No. 1; & Amendment No. 1 To Task Order No. 1 Consultant Project Lead: Rainse Anderson, PE Professional Services October 1, 2010 Through October 17, 2010 TASK 0400 - Environmental Permitting and Mitigation Professional Personnel Name Hours Rate Amount Anderson, Rainse E. 5.00 194.61 $ 973.05 Brigham, Adina C. 0.50 • 69.00 $ 34.50 Quarterman, Philip J. 22.75 119.53 $ 2,719.31 Total Labor 28.25 TASK 9990 - Reimbursable Expenses $ 3,726.86 Airfare $ 270.40 Car Rental $ 83.83 Lodging $ 169.40 Meals $ 78.19 Mileage 30 @ $ 0.50 $ 15.00 Parking / Fuel $ 67.93 Supplies $ 35.27 Technology Charges 28.25 @ $ 5.00 $ 141.25 Total $ 861.27 Total This Invoice $ 4,588.13 Billings to Date Current 4,588.13 Total Authorized Budget $ 277,878.32 Prior 246,925.43 Remaining Authorized Budget for this Task Order $ 26,364.76 Billings to Date 251,513.56 WHl'aufic Date EMPLOYEE EXPENSE REPORT Employee Name Employee No. Week Ending. Office Business Line Phil. Quarterman 8174 10/16/10 Portland Transp. Location (city, state) 9/29 to 10/4 Beaverton OR 10/05/10 10/05/10 10/11 io 13 Tualatin OR Linnton OR Project Name OR Office and Business Line 209.209.612.13.124 209.209.612.13.115 209.209.612.13.124 Project Number and Task Number GL Account Number o A B C U ST I tvlf-tl 5°iP-o1111 m t v O Air Travel Transportation Lodging 33964.9990 ;510 -I11-4 ;iient (C 35257.9990 35934.99900 McCall ID 209.209.612.13.115 34256.9990 rent (C ;Iient (C :lient (C Total $270.40 $15.00 $10.00 $17.50 $166.76 $169.40 D Z Per Diem Meals $78.19 F Business Meals / Entertainment . i0 l r-3(r o DAft3 Ga Date G � I�-olt- Miscellaneous $32.06 H Total of Columns A-G $15.00 $.1 $17.50 $716.81 $270.40 $209.26 $169.40 Date Purpose of Trip, 9/29 to 10/4 Contractor assistance on site 10/05/10 Meeting on site with client and Clean Water Services 10/05/10 Wetland delineation 10/11 to 13 Site visit to review potential mitigation sites VO lit Cat 6" 2--IkP- (0 0-701-cfr .! < o i/Sir 0 A g-ii y 1..,.____ $0.00 $78.19 $0.00 Less Employee Advances Employee Advance Number Amount Due Employee OR (Amount .Due .WHPacif3c, Inc.) . $32.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 -' $0 $0.00 $759.31 $759.31 ( $0.00 ) $759.31 CAUsers1Public1Documents1101610expense report1 xis Expense Report Detail. Enter all company reimbursable expenses . Carry the totals to page one. Receipts must be included for all expenditures over $25.0C. B - Ground Transportation (Cab fares, car rentals, road tolls, parking, etc.) Date Item Cost 10/13/10 10/12/10 PDX parking Gasoline $41.00 $26.93 10/13/10 Car rental $83.83 $151.76 B - Ground Transportation (Personal vehicle mileage) 09/29/10 09/30/10 10/04/10 10/05/10 10/05/10 10/11 to 13 From From Office To Beaverton 10.0 ) miles @ $ . ( 0.500 Office To Beaverton 10.0 ) miles @ $ . ( 0.500 ) From Office To Beaverton ( 10.0 ) miles @ $ . ( 0.500 ) From Office To Tualatin ( 20.0 ) miles @ $ . ( 0.500 ) From Office To Linnton ( 35.0 ) miles @ $ . ( 0.500 ) From Hoene To PDX ( 30.0 ) miles @ $ . ( 0.500 ) Total 5.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 17.50 15.00 $57.50 D & E - Personal Meals while Traveling (Include tax & gratuity) Date 10/11/10 Departure & Return Time 5 am Daily M&IE Rate Breakfast 3.35 Lunch Dinner 8.09 $ 30.83 Cost 42.27 10/12/10 $ 12.50 18.61 31.11 10/13/10 8 am 4.81 4.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 G - Miscellaneous Expense Detail (Please be specific) Date Item Total $78.19 Cost 10/11/10 Shovel $32.06 F Business. Meals / Entertainment Detail (Please be specific. Should not include the cost of the traveler's lodging, meals or incidentals.) Attendees / Guests Date Purpose (Please be specific) Total $32.06 Cost CAUsers\Public\Documents\101fi10expense reportl.xls Total $0.00 Alaska Airlines and Horia r - Purchased Reservation Page 1 of Confirmati ,F`' Purthas+e Your reservation is complete. Print this -page for your check -in and airport use. A confirmation letter, Including your itinerary, receipt and consumer notices, will be e=malled to you. You may cancel or make one change to nis.flight itinerary with no penalty.within -24 hours of purchase, Many reservations rnay be changed or canceled oRline,^or you can contact us by phone prior` to the flight. Enter Required Traveler Documentation Sign Up for My Account Add Itinerary to a Calendar Forward Itinerary to a Friend Trip Inforevtatiop Fllght`�-,��� , �#rrli►e Portland,. OR (PDX) Boise (BOI) Horizon Air 2311 6:35 am Mon, Oct•11 8:48 am Mon, Oct 1 . .i :;. 11611.1. livasv.rA ta1�5 t Coach • Total: 3• 7041sw Horizon Air 2582 Boise (BOI) 6:25 am Wed, Oct 13 ti Portland, OR (PDX) 6:45 am Wed, oct 13 Coach,• Totali 3• } Orbitz Trip ID: 1012-5836 You can view or cancel your hotel and car reservation(s) online using the Trip ID above: For changes please call Or service at 1-800-650-2911. Any changes made may not be reflected on alaskaair.com. Inn America - Boise Check in on Tue, Oct 12 after 3:00 pm. Check out on. Wed, Oct 13 by 1:00 pm. Hotel confirmation number: 129706545 i44 ne#11 '13u get Midsize Car confirmation number: 19245787US1 et," Name: Philip Quarterman MP#: Alaska 86880010 E-ticket: 0272157995056 Pick up in terminal on Mon, Oct 11 at 9:00 am. Return to same location Oh Wed, Oct 13 at 6:00 am.;':: Name c Philip Locatidi . 2275Arrvi -4- Boise; I Primary Philip C LocaFiol Air Term r nu+-t 15A 15E Request additional servi41 c. Change seats O Alr Carrier Access Act requires us to make certain seats available to customers with disabilities. If you are assigned one of the qualified person requests it, you will be reaccommodated at the airport In another seat. Fare Summary The VISA ending with *******3480 has been charged a total of USD $270.40. Fare Taxes & Fees Charoefs) https://www.alaskaair.com/booking/ssl/booking.aspx 10/5/2010 Alaska Airlines and Horiz it - Purchased Reservation Page 2 of 3 Airfare for Philip Quarterman: $249.00 $21.40 $270.40 J (Currency Converter) FormID: 304752c1a639e475a8520116e903bf29f For additional assistance with your reservation call Alaska Airlines Reservations at 1-800-ALASKAAIR (1-800-252-7! Reservations at 1-800-547-9308. Credit Card Trip Protection Trip Alerts Maps & Guides Apply for Our Visa Signature® Card and Earn 25,000 Bonus Miles Upon Approval • Receive a$99 (USD) round-trip Companion Ticket Discount Code on Alaska Alrlines/Horizon Air travel and Vacation Packages• • Earn 3 miles per dollar spent on Alaska Airlines/Horizon Air Ecket purchases • Earn 1 mile for every $1 spent on all other purchases • Redeem miles for flights, vacation packages, and a wide range of partner awards APPLY CUciW Hotel and Car The Other VISA ending with *******3480 has been charged a total of $63.14. LOG{L J Details: • This hotel reservation will show up as a separate charge on your credit card from Orbitz. • Estimated cost of $83.83 will be due at time of car pickup. Taxes Amount Travel Reminders Carry -on Baggage Each passenger is limited to one carry -on bag, that measures up to 10„x 17 x 24 inches (25 x one personal item like a purse, laptop, or small backpack. View our Carry -on Baggacie Policy. Checked Baggage In addition to the carry -on baggage restrictions outlined above, passengers traveling on Alaska Air, will be charged $20 each for the first three checked bags. For faster service, use your debit or credit card when at an airport kiosk. See our Checked Baggage Policy for details and exceptions. Domestic Travel The U.S. Department of Homeland Security requires commercial airlines to collect Secure Flight li name, gender, birth date) from travelers and transmit this information to the Transportatioh Security Administratioi matching purposes. Secure Flight information is required for all flights. httns://www.alaskaair.com/booking/ssl/bnnkina acnx 1 !1 /G /1111 A Hotels.com - Hotel rooms N •eviews. Discounts and Deals on 85,( Lotels worldwide Page 1 of 3 r 3.Purchase Complete Thank you Philip. • Print this page • Print receipt This page is confirmation of your reservation Your purchase has been completed. Don't worry we're still here to help you with customer care 7 days a week, 365 (days a year (including holidays) on 866-538-6247. Have a great trip. You can view, print or cancel your reservation by clicking here . Holiday Inn Express Hotel & Suites McCall Your purchase summary Itinerary No 15546618423 rry�e�l 4.2 1210 N 3rd St M cca I I 83638 ID United States 800-741-1620 Arrive: October 11, 2010 Depart: October 12, 2010 Duration: 1 nights Room Type: One king deluxe Breakfast Buffet Room 1 Philip Quarterman 1 adult Non Smoking Your billing information 1703 SW Marigold Street Portland Oregon 97219 United States Name on card: Philip Quarterman Total Price:(Visa) `` $106.26 l—d19\ (Including tax recovery charges and service fees) e Map & directions to your Hotel 1 M 4-{cew toll httns://ssl_hntelccnm/tchnnkinahiptailc httrd 1n/G Plntn gem stop # 14 - 3205 vista STN 00305292 10/12/10 20:40:27 E/VISA - - xxxxxxxxxxxx0614 ILvoice# 9256120 Auth# 093956 NIL5 8. 81 G $ '2.999 unle/Self $ 26.93 -- Total $ 26.93 :gee application about how to EARN REWARDS with a Chevron and Texaco Personal Credit Card! LOWE'S HIM, INC. 3400 NORTH EAGLE ROAD MERIDIAN, ID 83642 (208) 898-5220 - SALE - SALES M: S2573KL1 807983 10-11-10 95345 16" DRAIN SPADE FG JACKSO 30.24 SUBTOTAL: 30.24 TAX: 1.82 INVOICE 09045 TOTAL: 32.06 UISA: 32.06 Xla , .s5.2.-r - THANK ING YOU GEM FOR STOP VISA:XXXXXXXXXXXXD614- MOUNT: 32-I16 anrurn.naonns.- ---- TEXACO Rece iPt _:__._. OUT BOI 110CT10/0901 MI = 11144 _ Standard Parkin, *IN BOI 130CT10/0524 MI = 11441 • PO Box 56475 297 MI@ 00 = d Portland, OR 97238 e, 2 DY@ 33.99 = 67.98 z Game Entry - Exit Lane 2 iEV210) -- -�-`- o $.50/DY ERF = 1.00 Audit*, 7393011040284190830 **10.0096FEE _ 6.90 ..-------.____�-_ ▪ TAXABLE SUBTOT = 75.88 5 . -- 'a TAX 6.000% = 4.55 el I _ _ L *$1.70/DAY FEE = 3.40 Y FUEL SERVICE _ 0 Amount Paid: $ 41.00 • TOTAL CHARGES = 83.83 !- visa i "CONCESSION RECOVERY FEE V ; GUARTERMAIVPHILIP - i ▪ *$1.20/DY CUST FAC FEE(14 DAY xxxx xxxx xxxx 0614 ,: MAX) A $ . 50 / DY VLF RECOUP ENERGY RECOVERY FEE .50/DY Addi Thank you for renting from Budget RENTAL..NUMBER CARNUMBER CAR GROUP 228367580 51205151 C QUARTERMAN,PHILIP CV - CXXX)UUUUUWUU(0614 in: 10/11/10 05118:00 )utl 10/13/10 07119 Receive rental receipts by email every time you rent Andget access to special offers & more. See reverse .) Steamers Steak 8 Seafood The Cork Wine Bar 308 E. Lake St 208-634-1411 Monday,October 11,2010 TABLE # D9-1 CHECK # 25406 1 NEW YORK SUB -TOTAL Sales Tax TOTAL $32.81 Thank You Come Again 6:44 PM __You have been served By: #2 Johanna ;4 HMSHOST STARUCKS COFFEE PORTLANp INT'L AIRPORT -------- 794 MEGHAN • CHK 9257 OCT11'10 5:54AM SUBTOTAL 1 TALL COD T 1 DANISH 1.85 * COME BACK nonm SUBTOTAL 3.35 AMOUTN PAID 3 . 3 5 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX4 XX/XX VISA AO 3 .35 KanallPasni!t;igi-gPi. HARPO'S SOUTH HWY 55 CASCADE, IDAHO Harpo's 823 S. Mein Cascade ID STNO 00207613 Credit Card Receipt QUARTERMAN/PHILIP xxxxxxxxxxxx0614 E/UISA SMASH HITS 6.596 Pizza Coupon -0.756 OS CRAN-ORPE 1.796 Items: 3 Subtotal 7.63 Sales Tax 1 0.46 Total 8.09 Credit CardiUSDS) $8.09 InuoiceU: 1343460 Authil: 001800 ------------ *** Customer COPY *** Sea application about hou to EARN REWARDS with a Chevron and Texaco Personal Credit Card! • 2195635e60s2664t2 10/11/10 11:18:37 1 .50 *** THANK YOU *** VTGMMI ES RESTRURRN 263 H Main Donnelya ID. 83615 TERMINAL I.D.: 8817348808958826866981 OWN: 95B826M VISA 5RU: 81 ************0614 SALE RECORD N: 3 INW 000803. DATE: OCT IL N TIME: 11:10 BA1CN: 793 NM 020555 ...___ __._._....—-_.__... BASE $12.67 r, F 3 So - --�- TOTAL TIP TOTAL PHILIP ®UARTERMAN 1 AGREE TO PAY ABOVE TOTAL AMOUNT ACCORDING TO CARD ISSUER AGREEMENT (MERCHANT AGREEMENT IF CREDIT VOUCHER) CUSTOMER COPY C 2, tRY jz—etr--) 434436733880 PNO NOUVEAU 700 W. IDAHO S1 N! BOISE, ID 83702 (208)367-1111 TERMINAL I.D.: 07558801 VISA SRV: 1 XXXXXXXXXXXX0614 SALE BATCH: BBB452 I NV : 46 DATE: OCT 12, 18 TIME: 18:13:27 AUTH HO: 091604 BASE $19.66�1� TTe �• uA� 22 , L ) ------ PHILIP AUARTERMAN HMSHOST OUTPOST EXPRESS BOISE INT'L AIRPORT 270 MARIFJON X I AGREE TO PAY ABOVE TOTALT ACCORDING TO CARD ISSUER AGREEMENT (MERCHANT AGREEMENT IF CREDIT VOUCHER) ***CUSTOMER COPY*** CHK 1562 OCT13'10 5:32AM GST 2 1 1 COD PASTRY NO CHOICE 16oz 2.05 2.49 SUBTOTAL 4.54 TAX 0.27 AMOUNT 4 . 81 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX4 XX/XX VISA AO 4.81 John Anderson, A.A.E City of McCall 216 E Park Street McCall, ID 83638 Project: McCall Airport Environmental Assessment City of McCall Task Order No. 1; & Amendment No. 1 To Task Order No. 1 Professional Services March 1, 2010 Through March 28, 2010 V/HPailic April 12, 2010 Project No. 34256 Invoice No: 34256-13 Task Original Budget CA No. 1 Total Budget % Comp. Total To Date Remaining Previous Invoices Current Invoice 1000- Project Administration $ 12,194.69 $12,194.69 100% $12,160.12 $ 34.57 $12,160.12 $0.00 0100 - Initial Public Inv & Scoping $ 17,859.26 $17,859.26 100% $17,855.11 $ 4.15 $17,855.11 $0.00 0200 - Data Collection Affected Env $ 28,993.55 $28,993.55 100% $28,990.26 $ 3.29 $28,990.26 $0.00 0300 - Dev of Env Consequences Section $ 53,528.69 $53,528.69 108c/0 $57,963.95 $ (4,435.26) $53,148.47 $4,815.48 0303 - Subconsultant Tom Duebendorfer $ 6,776.00 $ 6,776.00 89% $6,006.00 $ 770.00 $6,006.00 $0.00 0312 - Subconsultant Haz Mat Kleinfelder $ 8,250.00 $ 8,250.00 0% $0.00 $ 8,250.00 $0.00 $0.00 0313 - Subconsultant SWCA $ 21,835.00 $21,835.00 100% $21,759.66 $ 75.34 $21,759.66 $0.00 0400 - Env Permitting & Mitigation $ 35,530.00 $35,530.00 9% $3,348.43 $32,181.57 $651.68 $2,696.75 0402 - Subconsultant Mountain States / Clearwater $ 7,700.00 $ 7,700.00 0% $0.00 $ 7,700.00 $0.00 $0.00 0500 - Preliminary Engineering $ 46,760.61 $46,760.61 100% $46,756.26 $ 4.35 $46,756.26 $0.00 0512 - Subconsultant Geo Kleinfelder $ 13,145.00 $13,145.00 99% $13,003.32 $ 141.68 $13,003.32 $0.00 0600 - NIDGS Survey $ - $ 4,261.17 $ 4,261.17 19% $814.59 $ 3,446.58 $814.59 $0.00 9990 - Reimbursable Expenses $ 20,759.80 $ 284.55 $21,044.35 102% $21,454.23 $ (409.88) $21,129.73 $324.50 Total $ 273,332.60 $ 4,545.72 $277,878.32 83% $230,111.93 $47,766.39 $222,275.20 $7,836.73 Subscribed this 12th day of April, 2010 Rainse E. Anderson, PE Project Manager Remit To: WHPacific, Inc. 9755 SW Barnes Road, Suite 300 Portland, Oregon 97225 9755 SW Barnes Road, Suite 300 • Portland, OR 97225 • T 503.626.0455 • F 503.526.0775 • www.whpacific.com OUTLAY REPORT AND REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS (See instructions on back) OMB APPROVAL NO.0348-0002 PAGE 1 OF 1 1. TYPE OF REQUEST FINAI XE PARTIAL .— 2. BASIS OF REQUEST ^ CASH ACCRUAL X 3. FEDERAL SPONSORING AGENCY AND ORGANIZATIONAL ELEMENT TO WHICH THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED Federal Aviation Administration 4. FEDERAL GRANT OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER ASSIGNED BY FEDERAL AGENCY 3-16-0023-18 5. PARTIAL PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 3 ( grant total 590,611.00) 6. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 82-60000223 7. RECIPIENT'S ACCOUNT OR IDENTIFYING NUMBER 8 PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REQUEST FROM (Month, day, year) 2/1/2010 TO (Month, day, year) I 2/28/2010 9. RECIPIENT ORGANIZATION Name' McCall Municipal Airport No. and Street: 216 East Park Street City, State McCall, Idaho ZIP Code: 83638 10. PAYEE (Where check is to be sent if different from item 9 ) Name. - No. and Street: City, State and ZIP Code: 11. STATUS OF FUNDS CLASSIFICATION PROGRAMS - FUNCTIONS - ACTIVITIES 1) Previous 2) Current (3) TOTAL a. Administrative Expense $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 b. Preliminary Expense Independent Fee Est. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 c. Land, structures, right-of-way $0.00 d. Architectural engineering basic fees $34,450.58 $8,526.25 $42,976.83 e. Other architectural engineering fees f. Project inspection fees $0.00 $0.00 h. Relocation expense j. Demolition and removal k. Construction and project improvement cost $0.00 $0.00 I. Equipment m. Miscellaneous cost n. Total cumulative to date (Sum of lines a through m ) $34,450.58 $8,526.25 $42,976.83 o. Deductions for program income p. Net cumulative to date (Line n minus Line o ) $34,450.58 $8,526.25 $42,976.83 q. Federal share to date $32,728.05 $8,099.94 $40,827.99 r. Rehabilitation grants (100% reimbursement ) s. Total Federal share (Sum of Lines q and r ) $32,728.00 $8,099.00 $40,827.00 t. Federal payments previously requested $0.00 $0.00 $17,411.00 u. Amount requested for reimbursement $32,728.00 $8,099.00 $23,416.00 v. Percent of project completed 27% 9% % 36% 12. CERTIFICATION I Certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief the billed costs of disbursements are in accordance with the terms of the project and that the reimbursement represents the Federal share due which has not been previously requested and that an inspect a. RECIPIENT SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL 25-Mar-10 TYPED OR PRINTED NAME OR TITLE John Anderson, Airport Manager b. REPRESENTATIVE CERTIFYING TO LINE 11V SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL 25-Mar-10 TYPED OR PRINTED NAME OR TITLE John Anderson, Airport Manager AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION PREVIOUS EDITION USABLE J IAIVUNKU rVRM Lr I tReV. !-VI) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 and A-110 OUTLAY REPORT AND REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS (See instructions on back) OMB APPROVAL NO.0348-0002 PAGE 1 of 1 1. TYPE OF REQUEST C FINAt© PARTIAL 2. BASIS OF REQUEST X CASH DCCRUAL 3. FEDERAL SPONSORING AGENCY AND ORGANIZATIONAL ELEMENT TO WHICH THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED Federal Aviation Administration 4. FEDERAL GRANT OR OTHER'. IDENTIFYING NUMBER ASSIGNED BY FEDERAL AGENCY 3-16-0023-18 5. PARTIAL PAYMENT REQUEST NO . 5( grant total 590,611.00) 6. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 82-60000223 7. RECIPIENT'S ACCOUNT OR IDENTIFYING NUMBER 8 PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REQUEST FROM (Month, day, year) 3/1/2010 TO (Month, day, year) 3/28/2010 9. RECIPIENT ORGANIZATION Name: McCall Municipal Airport No. and meet: 216 East Park Street City, State McCall, Idaho ZIP code: 83638 10. PAYEE (Where check is to be sent if different from item 9 1 Name. - No. and Street: City, State and ZIP Code: 11. STATUS OF FUNDS CLASSIFICATION PROGRAMS - FUNCTIONS - ACTIVITIES 1) Previous 2) Current (3) TOTAL a. Administrative Expense $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 b. Preliminary Expense Independent Fee Est. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 c. Land, structures, right-of-way $0.00 d. Architectural engineering basic fees $42,980.14 $7,836.73 $50,816.87 e. Other architectural engineering fees f. Project inspection fees $0.00 $0.00 g. Land development h. Relocation expense i. Relocation payments to individuals and businesses j. Demolition and removal k. Construction and project improvement cost $0.00 $0.00 I. Equipment m. Miscellaneous cost n. Total cumulative to date (Sum of lines a through m ) $42,980.14 $7,836.73 $50,816.87 o. Deductions for program income p. Net cumulative to date (Line n minus Line o ) $42,980.14 $7,836.73 $50,816.87 q. Federal share to date $40,831.13 $7,444.89 $48,276.03 r. Rehabiiitation grants (100% reimbursement ) s. Total Federal share (Sum of Lines q and r ) $40,831.00 $7,444.00 $48,276.00 t. Federal payments previously requested $0.00 $0.00 $40,831.00 u. Amount requested for reimbursement $40,831.00 $7,444.00 $7,445.00 v. Percent of project completed 45% 8% % 53% 12. CERTIFICATION I Certify that t0 the best of my knowledge and belief the billed costs of disbursements are in accordance with the terms of the project and that the reimbursement represents the Federal share due which has not been previously requested and that an inspect a. RECIPIENT SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL 12-Apr-10 TYPED OR PRINTED NAME OR TITLE John Anderson, Airport Manager b. REPRESENTATIVE CERTIFYING TO LINE 11V SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL 12-Apr-10 TYPED OR PRINTED NAME OR TITLE John Anderson, Airport Manager AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION STANDARD FORM 271 (Rev. 7- 7) tesc PREVIOUS IZrTy of ��3J236Managemenr.Contract'lnvoicing FAA Retmb McCall EA AlP#18 Request 46.xls-Pay request +P` °bed by OMB Circular A-702 and A-110