HomeMy Public PortalAbout09.19.2018 Park Commission Meeting Packet Posted 9/14/2018 Page 1 of 1
AGENDA
MEDINA PARK COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2018 7:00 P.M.
Medina City Council Chambers
City Hall, 2052 County Road 24
1) Call to Order
2) Additions to Agenda
3) Approval of the Minutes from:
July 18, 2018 Regular Meeting
4) Public Comments (on items not on the agenda)
5) City Council Update
6) Three Rivers Park District – Baker Park Reserve Master Plan
7) OSI – Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review – Park Dedication Review
8) Park Donation Program
9) Staff Report
a) 2018 Park Commission Goals – Reoccurring Update
b) General Items
10) Adjourn
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
July 18, 2018
Medina City Hall
Page 1 of 3
The Park Commission of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on July 18, 2018 at 7:00 p.m.
at Medina City Hall. Park Commission Chair Steve Lee presided.
1) Call to Order
Commissioners Present: Steve Lee, Ann Thies, Mary Morrison, Elizabeth Weir,
Lori Meehan, Jeff Rumsey, and youth member Lauren
Lubenow
Commissioners Absent: John Jacob and youth member Ella Kingsley
Also Present: Council member John Anderson, Public Works Director
Steve Scherer, and Assistant City Administrator Jodi
Gallup
2) Additions to the Agenda: None
3) Approval of the Minutes from:
June 20, 2018 Regular Meeting
A motion was made by Weir and seconded by Lee to approve the minutes from June 20,
2018 as presented. Motion passed unanimously.
4) Public Comments (on items not on the agenda): None.
5) City Council Update
Anderson updated the Park Commission on recent City Council actions. He stated that
the City Council had a budget work session the night before to discuss the 2019 budget
and funding the municipal park fund. He stated the City Council has requested more
detail from the Park Commission before allocating money into the municipal park fund.
6) 2019-2023 Capital Improvement Plan & City Park Funds Discussion
Gallup stated that staff has worked with Lee to draft a five-year capital improvement plan
for our parks and trails based on discussions from the Park Commission following the
park tour and based on the growth plan in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. She noted that
Finance Director Erin Barnhart has put together an analysis showing the modest planned
improvements/park replacements over the next five years showing a negative fund
balance of $208,434.12. This number shows the need for setting aside money each year
in the municipal park fund to address the aging park equipment replacement needs.
Gallup stated that the City Council has requested a more detailed analysis of the City’s
long-term park and trail replacement needs.
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
July 18, 2018
Medina City Hall
Page 2 of 3
Lee reported that he has been working with staff to put together a detailed spreadsheet for
each city park. The spreadsheets include each park and trail asset, year acquired,
estimated replacement cost, estimated life span, and estimated replacement year. He
stated that he would continue to work with staff to finalize this document to create a more
thorough analysis going out 40 years illustrating the need to continue to fund the
Municipal Park Fund as parks and trails continue to age.
Thies reminded the Park Commissioners to not be too short sighted by not acquiring a
trail easement or future park that we cannot afford, because these connections can
provide a long-term benefit. Once the land develops, the opportunity is gone. She stated
that the city has missed opportunities in the past.
Weir suggested that the Municipal Park Fund analysis should include an introduction
describing the work that has been done by our past park commission leadership. She
stated that the Park Commission has known more funds would be needed to continue to
build new park and trail equipment and replace aging equipment, but general funds were
not dedicated to future parks and trails at that time due to the great recession. She
volunteered to work with Gallup to write an introduction to the Municipal Park Fund
analysis.
Anderson stated that as the city builds more and more parks and trails, we will have a
greater need to maintain these parks and trails into the future. He compared parks and
trails to roads stating, “People expect roads to be in good shape and we only hear about
the roads when something needs to be repaired”.
The Park Commissioners reviewed the proposed 2019-2023 Capital Improvement Plan
line by line. Discussion occurred on removing the reoccurring/rolling line items such as
general landscaping, small equipment, and land acquisition as it is confusing. Gallup
explained the purpose of these line items is to make sure some money is budgeted in
these areas each year to have funding available as unanticipated projects arise. She stated
that the city doesn’t spend the full amount each year and the leftover money is just rolled
to the next year. She suggested adding the language “reoccurring/rolling” in the
description to better explain the allocated funds.
The Park Commissioners discussed budgeting some funds for a possible cricket pitch in
Hamel Legion Park, looking into adding a second tennis court at Hunter Lions Park, and
adding new curbing at Medina Morningside Park.
Medina Park Commission Meeting Minutes - DRAFT
July 18, 2018
Medina City Hall
Page 3 of 3
A motion was made by Morrison and seconded by Weir to recommend to the City Council
the adoption of the 2019-2023 Capital Improvement Plan with discussed park and trail
changes. Motion passed unanimously.
7) Staff Report
Gallup reported that she spoke with a representative from the local cricket group and they
have requested that Medina create a cricket pitch in one of our parks. Lee and Gallup
agreed to meet with the cricket representative to discuss options.
8) Adjourn
A motion was made by Weir, seconded by Morrison and passed unanimously, to adjourn
the meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:22 p.m.
Minutes prepared by Jodi Gallup
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
123 North Third Street, Suite 100
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 www.hkgi.com
Creating Places that Enrich People’s Lives
AGENDA + PROJECT INFORMATION
Three Rivers Park District
Baker Park Reserve Master Plan
Medina Parks Commission Meeting
Wednesday, September 19, 2018
Medina City Hall
1. Meeting purpose
Meet with Medina park commissioners to learn about issues and opportunities related to
parks. Discuss any upcoming plans or projects that might affect the future of Baker Park
Reserve.
2. General Project Overview
Project Purpose and Goals
Create a new Master Plan to meet Met Council Thrive 2040 Regional Park requirements
Master Plan Components: Long term actions and goals (10-20 years); Existing conditions –
maps and inventory; Boundaries and acquisitions; Cost estimates for future investments;
Natural resources recommendations & Stewardship Plan; Visitor Demand Forecast; Operations
and Maintenance practices; Public Engagement; Accessibility
Engage the public + park users: Learn about issues and opportunities for the park reserve from
general public; Meet with affected agencies (cities, watershed districts); Meet with unique
stakeholders; Reach out to underrepresented groups to meet Met Council requirements
Project Schedule
June-July: Project Organization, Site Tour, Mapping
July-September: Public Outreach and Engagement, Staff and Agency Meetings, Analyze issues
and opportunities
September-October: Develop Concepts, Public Open House (Oct. 15), Refine Recommendations
October-November: Draft Plan Document
December-April: Finalize Plan, Municipal Resolutions of Support, TRPD Board and MetCouncil
Approvals
3. Questions – Discussion
What is the City’s long range vision for the area adjacent to Baker Park Reserve?
What do you think is the most important improvement that could be done in the next 10 years at
Baker Park Reserve?
What opportunities do you see for partnerships at the park reserve (education and interpretation,
programming, water quality projects, etc.)?
Baker Park Reserve Master Plan – Medina Park Commission Meeting – September 19, 2018
2
Are there coordination or communication issues that work well or don’t work well between TRPD
and the City of Medina? How could they be improved?
If you don’t use it, why not? What would attract you to come to the park reserve?
4. Thank You & Next Steps
Thanks for your input!
Public Open House on October 15th at Baker National Clubhouse
Baker Park Reserve Master Plan – Medina Park Commission Meeting – September 19, 2018
3
OSI Page 1 of 5 September 19, 2018
Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
MEMORANDUM
TO: Park Commission
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: September 13, 2018
MEETING: September 19, 2018 Park Commission
SUBJ: OSI – Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review – PID 03-118-23-41-0005
(west of Arrowhead Dr., north of Meander Rd.)
Background
Open Systems International, Inc. (OSI) has requested approval of various land use applications
to allow for construction of a second building on a separate lot north of their existing facility at
4101 Arrowhead Drive. The proposed structure is approximately 125,500 gross square feet and
is predominantly office, except approximately 20,000 s.f. of warehouse and 10,000 s.f.
training/meeting/assembly.
The subject site is a vacant 28.5 acre outlot, west of Arrowhead Drive and north of Meander
Road. The applicant proposes to subdivide the outlot into a 16.8 acre parcel to contain the new
building, with the remaining 11.66 acres being platted into an outlot.
The parcel is zoned Mixed Use, but the future land use of the property has been changed under
the 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan to Business. The applicant proposes to rezone the lot for the
new structure to the Business (B) zoning district.
The subject property is currently farmed and includes a large wetland to the west and three
smaller wetlands. There are trees located along the wetland edge and a grove of boxelder trees in
the east-central of the site. An aerial of the site can be found on the following page.
The request includes the following land use applications, and staff recommends that they be
considered in this order:
1) Rezoning of proposed Lot 1, Block 1 from Mixed Use to Business (B).
2) Preliminary Plat for subdivision of Outlot A into a lot and an outlot.
3) Site Plan review for construction of new building.
At this time, staff has identified some adjustments necessary to the Site Plan to meet City
requirements. Specifically, the City Engineer is recommending that the access point be shifted to
improve sightlines and that the applicant provide additional right-of-way for Arrowhead Drive.
This additional right-of-way causes the need to shift the parking lot to meet setback
requirements.
The applicant is working on updating plans to address these comments.
OSI Page 2 of 5 September 19, 2018
Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
Comprehensive Plan/Rezoning Request
As previously noted, the subject site has been designated as “Business” in the City’s 2020-2040
Comprehensive Plan. Previously, the site was identified as “Mixed Use” which is why the
property is zoned Mixed Use.
Within the following nine months, the City will need to rezone various properties, including this
subject site, which have been changed within the Comprehensive Plan update. The City has
established the Business (B) and Business Park (BP) zoning districts to implement the objectives
of the Business land use in the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has requested that the lot for
the new building be zoned B.
The Planning Commission discussed at their September 11 meeting and recommended approval
of the rezoning to B.
OSI Page 3 of 5 September 19, 2018
Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
Preliminary Plat
The applicant proposes to subdivide the existing outlot into a 16.81 acre lot to contain the
proposed building and a smaller outlot to the north, which would be again replatted in the future.
The following table compares Lot 1 to the B district standards and the Outlot to the BP
standards:
B Requirement Lot 1 BP Requirement Outlot A
Minimum Lot Area 3 acres 16.81 acre 3 acres 11.66 acre
Minimum Lot Width 175 feet 796 feet 200 feet 846 feet
Minimum Lot Depth 175 feet 1020 feet 200 feet 820 feet
Transportation, Streets and Right-of-way
The applicant proposes a new access point on the north of Lot 1 to serve the new building and
also proposes to connect the parking lot of the proposed building to the parking lot of the
existing building. Staff recommends a condition that cross-easements be provided for access
between the parcels.
The City Engineer has conducted a traffic analysis to determine what improvements are
necessary in connection with the new access and traffic generated on the lot. The City Engineer
recommends that the City require a petition and waiver for potential future improvements at the
new access point.
Proposed Site Plan
The proposed structure is approximately 125,500 gross square feet and is predominantly office,
except approximately 20,000 s.f. of warehouse and 10,000 s.f. training/meeting/assembly. All of
these uses are permitted in the B zoning district.
Following is a summary comparing the proposed construction to the dimensional standards of
the B district. This review is contingent upon rezoning to the B zoning district and would need
to be reevaluated if the City does not approve of the requested rezoning.
B District Requirement Proposed
Minimum Front Yard Setback 40 feet 257 feet
Minimum Rear Yard Setback (west) 25 feet 490 feet
Minimum Interior Yard Setback 25 feet
(15 feet if integrated)
27 feet (south)
327 feet (north)
Setback from Minor Collector
(Arrowhead Drive)
40 feet 257 feet
Setback from Residential (east) 100 feet
(75 feet w/ screening)
290 feet
(including ½ ROW)
Setback for Structures >35 feet + foot per foot (22.5 feet) 27 feet (south)
Minimum Parking Setbacks
Front Yard 25 feet 27 feet
Rear and Side Yard 15 feet 15 ft (N); 25 ft (S)
Residential (east) 100 feet
(60 feet w/ screening)
60 feet
(including ½ ROW)
Maximum Hardcover 70%
Building Height 45 feet 42.5 feet
OSI Page 4 of 5 September 19, 2018
Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
The minimum parking setback from residential property is 100 feet. Property east of Arrowhead
Drive is guided for residential development. The B zoning district permits a reduction of the
residential setback to 60 feet if landscape screening with an opacity of 70% is provided. The
proposed parking is setback 27 feet from the front property line. Staff believes it is reasonable to
measure the residential setback from the centerline of Arrowhead Drive rather than the front
property line. With the 50-feet of right-of-way, the parking would be setback 77 feet from the
centerline. A landscaping screen with an opacity of 70% is required for parking in this location.
If additional right-of-way is required for Arrowhead Drive as noted in the preliminary plat
review above, it appears that the parking lot will need to be adjusted to maintain the minimum
front setback. Otherwise, it appears that the proposed improvements meet the dimensional
requirements of the B district.
Park Dedication
The City’s subdivision ordinance states that the City can require one of the following for park
dedication:
1) Up to 10% of the buildable property (1.96 acres)
2) Cash in-lieu of land dedication up to 8% of the pre-developed market value of the
property ($170,960).
3) A combination of the above
Park Dedication was only collected for the parcel containing the original OSI building when
originally developed and was deferred for this outlot.
The City’s Park and Trail Plan is attached for reference. An existing off-street paved trail is
located along the east side of Arrowhead Drive.
A future park search area clips the western edge of the subject property. This search area
appears to be intended for the area west of the large wetland to the west of the site. As such,
staff does not recommend park land in this location.
The Park and Trail Plan identifies a future off-street paved trail along the future extension of
Chippewa Road along the north of Outlot A. Staff recommends that a 10-foot wide trail
easement be required along the north of Outlot A. This easement would be 0.11 acres in area, or
5.6% of the maximum land which could be required.
If the Park Commission recommends the trail easement along the north of the property, staff
would recommend that cash be accepted in-lieu of additional land dedication. 0.11 acre is 5.6%
of the maximum land which could be required, so staff would recommend 94.4% of the
maximum park fee, or $161,386.24
The applicant has previously requested that park fees be deferred for outlots. The Park
Commission and City Council can discuss if they find it appropriate to defer the fee for Outlot A
until re-platting of that site in the future.
OSI Page 5 of 5 September 19, 2018
Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City require a 10-foot trail easement along the northern property line
and a cash-in-lieu fee of $161,386.24 of additional dedication.
Attachments
1. List of Documents
2. Except from DRAFT 9/11/2018 Planning Commission minutes
3. Applicant Narrative
4. Plans received 8/29/2018
5. Parks and Trails Plan
OSI Page 1 of 5 September 19, 2018
Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
MEMORANDUM
TO: Park Commission
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: September 13, 2018
MEETING: September 19, 2018 Park Commission
SUBJ: OSI – Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review – PID 03-118-23-41-0005
(west of Arrowhead Dr., north of Meander Rd.)
Background
Open Systems International, Inc. (OSI) has requested approval of various land use applications
to allow for construction of a second building on a separate lot north of their existing facility at
4101 Arrowhead Drive. The proposed structure is approximately 125,500 gross square feet and
is predominantly office, except approximately 20,000 s.f. of warehouse and 10,000 s.f.
training/meeting/assembly.
The subject site is a vacant 28.5 acre outlot, west of Arrowhead Drive and north of Meander
Road. The applicant proposes to subdivide the outlot into a 16.8 acre parcel to contain the new
building, with the remaining 11.66 acres being platted into an outlot.
The parcel is zoned Mixed Use, but the future land use of the property has been changed under
the 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan to Business. The applicant proposes to rezone the lot for the
new structure to the Business (B) zoning district.
The subject property is currently farmed and includes a large wetland to the west and three
smaller wetlands. There are trees located along the wetland edge and a grove of boxelder trees in
the east-central of the site. An aerial of the site can be found on the following page.
The request includes the following land use applications, and staff recommends that they be
considered in this order:
1) Rezoning of proposed Lot 1, Block 1 from Mixed Use to Business (B).
2) Preliminary Plat for subdivision of Outlot A into a lot and an outlot.
3) Site Plan review for construction of new building.
At this time, staff has identified some adjustments necessary to the Site Plan to meet City
requirements. Specifically, the City Engineer is recommending that the access point be shifted to
improve sightlines and that the applicant provide additional right-of-way for Arrowhead Drive.
This additional right-of-way causes the need to shift the parking lot to meet setback
requirements.
The applicant is working on updating plans to address these comments.
OSI Page 2 of 5 September 19, 2018
Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
Comprehensive Plan/Rezoning Request
As previously noted, the subject site has been designated as “Business” in the City’s 2020-2040
Comprehensive Plan. Previously, the site was identified as “Mixed Use” which is why the
property is zoned Mixed Use.
Within the following nine months, the City will need to rezone various properties, including this
subject site, which have been changed within the Comprehensive Plan update. The City has
established the Business (B) and Business Park (BP) zoning districts to implement the objectives
of the Business land use in the Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has requested that the lot for
the new building be zoned B.
The Planning Commission discussed at their September 11 meeting and recommended approval
of the rezoning to B.
OSI Page 3 of 5 September 19, 2018
Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
Preliminary Plat
The applicant proposes to subdivide the existing outlot into a 16.81 acre lot to contain the
proposed building and a smaller outlot to the north, which would be again replatted in the future.
The following table compares Lot 1 to the B district standards and the Outlot to the BP
standards:
B Requirement Lot 1 BP Requirement Outlot A
Minimum Lot Area 3 acres 16.81 acre 3 acres 11.66 acre
Minimum Lot Width 175 feet 796 feet 200 feet 846 feet
Minimum Lot Depth 175 feet 1020 feet 200 feet 820 feet
Transportation, Streets and Right-of-way
The applicant proposes a new access point on the north of Lot 1 to serve the new building and
also proposes to connect the parking lot of the proposed building to the parking lot of the
existing building. Staff recommends a condition that cross-easements be provided for access
between the parcels.
The City Engineer has conducted a traffic analysis to determine what improvements are
necessary in connection with the new access and traffic generated on the lot. The City Engineer
recommends that the City require a petition and waiver for potential future improvements at the
new access point.
Proposed Site Plan
The proposed structure is approximately 125,500 gross square feet and is predominantly office,
except approximately 20,000 s.f. of warehouse and 10,000 s.f. training/meeting/assembly. All of
these uses are permitted in the B zoning district.
Following is a summary comparing the proposed construction to the dimensional standards of
the B district. This review is contingent upon rezoning to the B zoning district and would need
to be reevaluated if the City does not approve of the requested rezoning.
B District Requirement Proposed
Minimum Front Yard Setback 40 feet 257 feet
Minimum Rear Yard Setback (west) 25 feet 490 feet
Minimum Interior Yard Setback 25 feet
(15 feet if integrated)
27 feet (south)
327 feet (north)
Setback from Minor Collector
(Arrowhead Drive)
40 feet 257 feet
Setback from Residential (east) 100 feet
(75 feet w/ screening)
290 feet
(including ½ ROW)
Setback for Structures >35 feet + foot per foot (22.5 feet) 27 feet (south)
Minimum Parking Setbacks
Front Yard 25 feet 27 feet
Rear and Side Yard 15 feet 15 ft (N); 25 ft (S)
Residential (east) 100 feet
(60 feet w/ screening)
60 feet
(including ½ ROW)
Maximum Hardcover 70%
Building Height 45 feet 42.5 feet
OSI Page 4 of 5 September 19, 2018
Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
The minimum parking setback from residential property is 100 feet. Property east of Arrowhead
Drive is guided for residential development. The B zoning district permits a reduction of the
residential setback to 60 feet if landscape screening with an opacity of 70% is provided. The
proposed parking is setback 27 feet from the front property line. Staff believes it is reasonable to
measure the residential setback from the centerline of Arrowhead Drive rather than the front
property line. With the 50-feet of right-of-way, the parking would be setback 77 feet from the
centerline. A landscaping screen with an opacity of 70% is required for parking in this location.
If additional right-of-way is required for Arrowhead Drive as noted in the preliminary plat
review above, it appears that the parking lot will need to be adjusted to maintain the minimum
front setback. Otherwise, it appears that the proposed improvements meet the dimensional
requirements of the B district.
Park Dedication
The City’s subdivision ordinance states that the City can require one of the following for park
dedication:
1) Up to 10% of the buildable property (1.96 acres)
2) Cash in-lieu of land dedication up to 8% of the pre-developed market value of the
property ($170,960).
3) A combination of the above
Park Dedication was only collected for the parcel containing the original OSI building when
originally developed and was deferred for this outlot.
The City’s Park and Trail Plan is attached for reference. An existing off-street paved trail is
located along the east side of Arrowhead Drive.
A future park search area clips the western edge of the subject property. This search area
appears to be intended for the area west of the large wetland to the west of the site. As such,
staff does not recommend park land in this location.
The Park and Trail Plan identifies a future off-street paved trail along the future extension of
Chippewa Road along the north of Outlot A. Staff recommends that a 10-foot wide trail
easement be required along the north of Outlot A. This easement would be 0.11 acres in area, or
5.6% of the maximum land which could be required.
If the Park Commission recommends the trail easement along the north of the property, staff
would recommend that cash be accepted in-lieu of additional land dedication. 0.11 acre is 5.6%
of the maximum land which could be required, so staff would recommend 94.4% of the
maximum park fee, or $161,386.24
The applicant has previously requested that park fees be deferred for outlots. The Park
Commission and City Council can discuss if they find it appropriate to defer the fee for Outlot A
until re-platting of that site in the future.
OSI Page 5 of 5 September 19, 2018
Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review Park Commission Meeting
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City require a 10-foot trail easement along the northern property line
and a cash-in-lieu fee of $161,386.24 of additional dedication.
Attachments
1. List of Documents
2. Except from DRAFT 9/11/2018 Planning Commission minutes
3. Applicant Narrative
4. Plans received 8/29/2018
5. Parks and Trails Plan
Project: LR‐18‐232 – OSI Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review
The following documents are all part of the official record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are
only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall.
Documents Submitted by Applicant:
Document Received
Date
Document
Date
# of
pages
Electronic Paper
Copy?
Notes
Application 8/10/2018 8/10/2018 3 Application Y
Fee 8/10/2018 8/8/2018 1 Deposit Y $11,000
Narrative 8/10/2018 8/10/2018 1 Narrative Y
Building Uses/Summary 8/10/2018 8/10/2018 1 Building Uses Y
Wetland Information 8/10/2018 10/8/2013 17 Wetland Info Y
Plans 8/10/2018 8/10/2018 23 Plans‐8‐10‐2018 Y
Plans‐8‐17‐2018 8/17/2018 8/17/2018 9 Plans‐8‐17‐2018 Y Civil only
Plans‐8‐29‐2018 8/29/2018 8/29/2018 23 Plans‐8‐29‐2018 Y
Stormwater Plans 8/17/2018 8/17/2018 141 Stormwater Y
Stormwater Plans 9/5/2018 8/28/2018 156 Stormwater8‐28 Y
Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies
Document Document
Date
# of
pages
Electronic Notes
Engineering Comments 8/24/2018 4 EngComments‐8‐24‐2018
Engineering Comments 9/6/2018 5 EngComments‐9‐6‐2018
Traffic Comments 9/6/2018 5 TrafficComments
Legal Comments 8/22/2018 1 LegalComments
Building official Comments 8/17/2018 1 MWComments
Fire Dept Markup 8/24/2018 1 Fire Markup
Planning Commission Report 9/6/2018 12 Y 44 pages w/ attachments
City Council Report 9/13/2018 Y
(continued on back)
Public Comments
Document Date Electronic Notes
Planning Commission minutes 9/11/2018 PC Minutes
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 9/11/2018 Meeting Minutes
1
Public Hearing – Open Systems International (OSI) – PID 03-118-23-41-0005 – Rezoning to
Business, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan Review for the Construction of a Two-Story Office –
North of 4101 Arrowhead Drive
Finke presented a request from OSI to construct a 125,500 square foot building, to be predominantly
office with a smaller warehouse and training portion. He stated that this action would require three land
use approvals, presented in the order in which staff suggests they be considered as some actions are
contingent upon others – rezoning, subdivision followed by the Site Plan review. He stated that staff is
asking the Commission to focus on the rezoning request, as changes will be made to the Site Plan and
Preliminary Plat. He stated that the site layout is based on the requirements of the Business District and
therefore the remaining actions will be contingent upon the rezoning. He identified the subject site, north
of the existing OSI facility, and reviewed the surrounding land uses. He stated that the subject property is
guided for business in the 2020-2030 Comprehensive Plan and was previously designated for mixed use.
He stated that because of the previous designation, the property is zoned mixed use. He stated that zoning
would be inconsistent with the recently approved Comprehensive Plan and therefore absent the request
from the applicant, the City would need to rezone the parcel to Business or Business Park within the next
nine months. He reviewed similarities and differences between the different business districts. He stated
that the applicant is requesting the Business District for Lot 1 and did not request a zoning district for the
outlot. He stated that staff would recommend the Business Park District for the outlot. He stated that the
City has a good deal of discretion when rezoning properties and either the Business or Business Park
zoning would match the approved Comprehensive Plan.
Piper asked the current height of the existing OSI building.
Finke stated that he did not calculate that but noted that it is a two-story building with some exposed
lower level, which is similar to the proposal.
Steve Oliver, representing the applicant, stated that the floor heights of building one and two would be
matched.
Finke stated that the existing zoning for the existing building would allow up to 45 feet for height. He
provided details on the Preliminary Plat, which would propose to divide the outlot into two, one lot which
would include the proposed building and a remaining smaller outlot to the north. He reviewed the
comments from Engineering which included comments on transportation and utility infrastructure. He
noted that the Park Commission will discuss park dedication but believed that cash in lieu would be
recommended as there are not plans for parks in this area. He reviewed the details of the Site Plan and
noted that the training area would be utilized by employees already within buildings one and two. He
provided additional details on the proposed parking and proof of parking. He stated that the proposed
building design appears to meet the design standards within the proposed zoning district. He stated that
staff only recommends action on the rezoning as changes are still being made to the applicant’s plan.
Nester asked if there is a reason the entire site could not be zoned Business Park.
Finke responded that either Business or Business Park can be used to implement the Business land use,
depending on which the Planning Commission and Council find consistent with the objectives of the land
use and the purpose of the district.
White opened the public hearing at 7:33 p.m.
Tracy Lamberty, 4250 Arrowhead Drive, stated that she owns one of the two homes that will be most
impacted by this project. She stated that lighting is one of her biggest concerns as the lighting will be
coming closer to her home. She asked if the lighting has to be on 24 hours per day.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 9/11/2018 Meeting Minutes
2
Finke stated that the Code would not require 24-hour lighting and has requirements for the lighting
measured at the edge of the property.
Ms. Lamberty asked that the City require high berms on the residential border to provide a buffer between
the use and the adjacent residential property. She asked if the training facility would not have use 24
hours per day. She referenced the traffic increase on Arrowhead and the high speeds of the traffic under
existing conditions. She stated that the additional turn lane would increase the impact of the roadway to
the adjacent residential development. She asked the location of the driveway for the new facility.
Mr. Oliver replied the training would be generally during business hours and that the stakes on the
property mark the potential access point.
Ms. Lamberty asked if there would be a requirement for a second access.
Finke replied that the sites would be linked and therefore there would be a second access.
Ms. Lamberty asked if the building is going to sit on the hill as that would increase the height.
Mr. Oliver replied that the building would be constructed into the hill to lessen the visual impact.
White explained that the action tonight would simply address the rezoning and the Site Plan will come
forward at a future date and will include some of the more detailed information the resident is looking for.
Keith Meuller, 4495 Bluebell Trail S, stated that he has been through other requests where the enjoyment
and monetary value of his property have been impacted. He stated that when you purchase a home there
is a lot of public information available to a buyer about the zoning, which helps the buyer to make the
right investment in their future. He stated that when someone looks at a home in Bridgewater they drive
by two signs that say proposed land development, which has an impact on potential buyers. He stated
that he is not sure of the change to the Comprehensive Plan that designates the future use of the property
as business. He stated that it appears that the locomotive is already out of the gate and it would be hard to
slow this down. He commented that his best result would for the rezoning to not be approved, even
though he recognized that the change in zoning is identified in the long-range plan of the City. He
recognized that this request would most likely not impact the enjoyment or value of his property directly
but would impact the properties of the neighbors to the subject property, which in turn would have an
impact on the comparable values for real estate. He stated that if his wish to deny the rezoning could not
be granted, he would like to see it minimized to the extent possible. He noted that this development will
impact his commute. He stated that he is empathetic with a business that would like to continue to thrive
and grow but noted that he purchased his business within a Business District and therefore does not have
to infringe on residential properties abutting the property.
Ron Ingram, an owner of OSI, stated that he hears the concerns that people are describing and stated that
they will do everything they can to address. He noted that the Comprehensive Plan guides this property
for business. He asked the residents the type of business that they would like in their neighborhood and
believed that his business is the right fit. He stated that if it is not OSI, it is unknown to the type of
business that could come in.
Mr. Mueller stated that OSI could be a good neighbor but recognized that businesses sometimes change
hands and then it would be unknown what would happen.
White closed the public hearing at 7:47 p.m.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 9/11/2018 Meeting Minutes
3
Piper asked if the applicant could show how far into the property the new building would go.
Finke identified the proposed location of the building on the site as well as the proposed parking area in
relation to the property line.
Piper asked the location of the access.
Finke replied that would be on the north end of the lot and the outlot would remain north of that.
Piper asked how big the outlot may be.
Finke was unsure of the exact size of the outlot following the changes.
Reid noted that the northern outlot would remain undeveloped until a future date.
Nester commented that she believes that the entire site should be Business Park as that would fit in better
with the residential as it would lower the height of the building and require the berming.
Finke replied that under Business Park the maximum height would be 35 while the proposed height of the
building is 42 feet. He stated that the way that building height is calculated, the overall height would not
need to be lowered because of the way the building will be situated in the hill. He noted that the building
length could be increased, or additional lower level could be buried to lower the building height. He
noted that there is already a 70 percent requirement for opaque screening along Arrowhead.
Piper asked and received confirmation that the proposed building height would not be higher than the
existing building height.
White stated that it appears that the applicant is attempting to incorporate the design of the existing
building to ensure a cohesive look. She stated that with the original building there was a lot of pressure
for the applicant to create a prairie style that blends into the environment and is happy to see that
continuing and therefore is not concerned with the building height.
Reid asked if the parking lot lights are on 24 hours per day.
Mike Kuklok, OSI, replied that there are employees at the facility 24 hours per day and therefore it is
desired to have lighting in the parking lot for safety. He stated that they are looking at available
technologies and would use downcast lighting. He stated that the newer LED lighting allows the light
fixtures to be lowered.
White reviewed the staff memorandum, noting that the site has been guided for Business under the
approved Comprehensive Plan. She felt that due to the proximity of Arrowhead Drive, it would be
appropriate to have the zoning be Business based on the objectives outlined. She commented that the
outlot could be zoned for Business Park.
Nester stated that it will be business either way, the decision will be whether it is Business or Business
Park. She believed that Business Park would be preferable because of the proximity to residential
property and Business Park would provided better opportunities for buffering and screening.
Finke stated that the buffering requirement is the same for both districts.
Nester noted that the main difference would be the height difference of ten feet.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 9/11/2018 Meeting Minutes
4
Reid commented that would result in a larger building footprint. She noted that a future building to come
on the outlot would need to be a lower height. She commented that OSI has been a great addition to
Medina and has been a great business, therefore she is inclined to support the Business District. She
stated that it would help the applicant to consider lighting, berming, and screening when refining the Site
Plan to be a good neighbor to the residential properties. She also agreed that the outlot should be
Business Park, as that would provide transition.
Piper asked the number of additional employees.
Mr. Ingram confirmed that there would be additional employees hired, noting that it would be mostly
engineers and professionals. He estimated that perhaps 100 additional employees would be hired in the
beginning and over the next few years more staff would be hired. He estimated that the building would
be filled within five years and at that time OSI would look at the outlot.
Finke stated that the proposal is the same comparative height as the existing building, but because more of
the top level is exposed that impacts overall height calculation.
Mr. Oliver stated that one of the reasons the site is what is it is, is because the site has a fall of about 20
feet. He stated that they are taking advantage of the natural fall rather than attempting to bury the site
against the wetland. He stated that from the south and north the site will read as a two-story building.
Finke stated that the outlot is not included as part of the request from the applicant and therefore the City
would need to rezone the outlot in the future.
Motion by Reid, seconded by Piper, to recommend approval of the rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1,
Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park to the Business Zoning District. Motion carries 3-1 (Nester opposed).
(Absent: Albers, Amic, and Williams)
Nester noted that she is opposed because she believes that Business Park would be a better zoning.
Nester noted that she believes the parcel should be zoned Business Park.
White noted that the Plat and Site Plan review would be considered at a future meeting.
Nester noted that there are trails marked future and she would like to see those included because of the
higher number of pedestrians in the area.
White asked that the applicant considers the public comments and noted that any improvements to
lighting and landscaping and berming would be appreciated.
Motion by Piper, seconded by Reid, to table consideration of the Preliminary Plat and Site Plan review
to allow the applicant to update plans. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Albers, Amic, and
Williams)
Finke stated that the City Council is scheduled to review the rezoning request at their meeting next
Tuesday and the remainder of the requests will be brought back to the Planning Commission at the next
meeting.
MEMORANDUM
1000 Twelve Oaks Center Drive Tel 952.426.7400
Suite 200 Fax 952.426.7440
Wayzata, MN 55391 www.mohagenhansen.com
MOHAGEN HANSEN
Architecture | Interiors
Date: August 10. 2018
Memo To: Dusty Finke, Planner
City of Medina
From: Design Team
Mohagen Hansen Architecture | Interiors
Project: Open Systems International: Building 2
Project No.: 17428.0OSI
Open Systems International, currently headquartered at 4101 Arrowhead Drive, needs to expand their software
development operations to house additional design and engineering teams as well as additional support spaces for
staff. The company continues to grow at an aggressive pace and is already busting at the seams in their existing
facility that was built in 2010.
As OSI looks to expand their operations in Medina, the proposed Building 2 is expected to include the same basic
programmatic uses as Building 1, but with the addition of a more robust space for conferencing. Primary
programmatic components include:
· Two-story main office building with basement under west half.
· Single-story southerly wing for conference center for up to 800 people (housing company-wide events).
· Office environment for up to 400 employees.
· Staging area for teaming and project specific testing and development.
· Warehouse space with 2 loading docks and drive-in door
Additional employee amenities include:
· Dedicated break room for Building 2 staff.
· Fitness center with locker rooms for use by entire campus.
· Coffee and Break-out spaces throughout the building.
· Connection to existing campus trail.
· Outdoor patio and yard spaces.
· Covered walkway between buildings.
From a design standpoint Building 2 will be complementary to Building 1, with matching brick, glass features and
other exterior accents, but with a different aesthetic expression for the two-story portion of the building. The site will
be developed in an integrated manner, connecting the parking lots, introducing a covered on-grade connector and
picking up on similar details for planting and site lighting.
OSI wishes to retain the northerly portion of the site as an outlot for future expansion for their needs or to develop or
sell for other business-related development in the future.
K:\JOBS\Open Systems\Building 2 17428\01_Admin\Corres\17428_M_Project Narrative - 081018.docx
BUILDING USES & AREAS
OPEN SYSTEMS BUILDING #2
MEDINA, MN
08/10/2018
SITE LOCATION
BUILDING USE
WAREHOUSE - LOWER LEVEL
FITNESS AREA - LOWER LEVEL
TOTAL
TYPE SQ.
FEET
OCC.
FACTOR
OCC.
LOAD
2 EXITS
REQUIRED
S-1 19,850 USF 500 40
A-3 50 46 N
2,296
Y
CODE REVIEW
1. COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL IS LESS THAN 0'-0" LONG
NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGES FOR BUILDING PERMIT ONLY, NOT FOR LEASING
2,272 USF
SUBTOTAL - LOWER LEVEL - - 86 -22,122 USF
TRAINING AREA - FIRST LEVEL A-3 7 1,326 Y9,279 USF
OFFICE AREA - FIRST LEVEL B 100 493 Y49,273 USF
SUBTOTAL - FIRST LEVEL - - 1,819 -58,552 USF
OFFICE AREA - SECOND LEVEL B 100 391 Y39,040 USF
119,714 USF
ZONING SUMMARY PARKING SUMMARY
1000 Twelve Oaks Center Drive
Suite 200, Wayzata, MN 55391
T: 952-426-7400
F: 952-426-7440
PR
O
J
E
C
T
CL
I
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
DA
T
E
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
H
A
S
E
PR
O
J
.
N
O
.
NEW CONSTRUCTION
MohagenHansen.com
OPEN SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL
4101 ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55430
OPEN SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, BUILDING #2
08/10/2018
17428.0OSI
OP
E
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
I
N
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
/
1
7
4
2
8
.
0
O
S
I
/
C
I
T
Y
S
UB
M
I
T
T
A
L
/
O
P
E
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
I
N
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
,
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
#
2
CITY SUBMITTALARROWHEAD DRIVE
AREA MAP
PROJECT GENERAL NOTES CONTINUEDPROJECT GENERAL NOTES
APPLICABLE CODES
OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENTS
I ACCEPT AND APPROVE THE INFORMATION PRESENTED
IN THIS DRAWING SET AS A REPRESENTATION OF OUR
DESIGN INTENT. SHOULD OWNER INITIATE CHANGES
THAT RESULT IN REVISIONS AND/OR MODIFICATIONS
ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICE FEES WILL BE CHANGED.
CLIENT APPROVAL
TITLE:
AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF:
NO
T
FOR
CONSTRU
CTION
CERTIFICATION
ARCHITECTURAL
1. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION, (AIA DOCUMENT A201,
CURRENT EDITION) IN ITS ENTIRETY, ARE PART OF THESE DOCUMENTS. ADDITIONAL NOTES
WITHIN THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT MEANT TO OVERRIDE ANY PART OF A201. CONTACT
ARCHITECT FOR A COPY OF A201, IF REQUIRED.
2. THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED PROJECT. UNLESS
OTHERWISE INDICATED, THEY DO NOT INDICATE THE MEANS OR METHOD OF
CONSTRUCTION.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN SUFFICIENT LIABILITY INSURANCE TO COVER WORKMAN'S
COMPENSATION, GENERAL LIABILITY AND CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY. A COPY SHALL BE FILED
WITH THE OWNER.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL WORK AND MATERIALS AS REQUIRED BY THE
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND
ORDINANCES.
5. THE CONTRACTOR WILL MAINTAIN BUILDER'S RISK INSURANCE ON THE FORM KNOWN AS "ALL
RISK" OR "MULTIPLE PERIL". THE CONTRACTOR, ALL SUBCONTRACTORS, ARCHITECTS AND
ENGINEERS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN EACH CAPACITY AS INSURED JOINTLY WITH THE OWNER IN
ALL POLICIES.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND FIELD CONDITIONS PRIOR TO
ANY DEMOLITION, FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION OR INSTALLATION & NOTIFY ARCHITECT IF
CONDITIONS, MATERIALS, SIZES AND DIMENSIONS ARE DIFFERENT FROM THOSE SHOWN.
7. CROSS REFERENCE ALL DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS WITH STRUCTURAL, CIVIL, MECHANICAL,
AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS BEFORE COMMENCING ANY FABRICATION AND/OR
CONSTRUCTION.
8. CONTRACTORS SHALL INSTALL ALL MANUFACTURED ITEMS, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT IN
STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED SPECIFICATIONS, EXCEPT
WHERE THE SPECIFICATIONS HEREIN, ARE MORE STRINGENT, AND SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH.
9. MATERIALS WHICH ARE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND WHICH MAY NOT BE SPECIFICALLY
DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OR DRAWINGS, SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE
CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR THE INTENDED USE. MATERIALS SHALL BE IN
HARMONY WITH ADJACENT MATERIALS, AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO REVIEW FOR
CONFORMANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. WHERE INSTALLATION
TECHNIQUES ARE NOT SPECIFIED, THEY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S
CURRENT INSTRUCTION AND INDUSTRY STANDARDS.
10. SHOP DRAWINGS PREPARED BY SUPPLIERS, SUBCONTRACTORS, ETC. SHALL BE REVIEWED,
COORDINATED AND SIGNED AND STAMPED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO SUBMITTING
TO THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER.
11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS, LICENSES AND CERTIFICATES AND
PAY ALL FEES CONNECTED THEREWITH THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT.
12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PREPARE ALL SURFACES FOR PROPER
INSTALLATION OF FINISHES. THIS IS TO INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO: PATCHING,
SANDING, FLOOR LEVELING, PRIMING, SEALING, SKIM COATING, ETC.
13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES KEEP THE PREMISES FREE FROM WASTE MATERIAL OR
RUBBISH CAUSED BY THE WORK.
14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND AREAS
ON THE SITE OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT
TEMPORARY WALLS AND BARRIERS AS REQUIRED TO CONTAIN DUST AND DEBRIS AND TO
PROVIDE SAFE PUBLIC ACCESS AND PASSAGE.
15. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL NEW MECHANICAL UNITS OR RELOCATE ANY
EXISTING UNITS OR ITEMS THAT CONFLICT WITH NEW OR EXISTING FRAMING AND FULL
HEIGHT WALLS. THIS INCLUDES ACCESS FOR ALL CONTROLS, FILTERS, ETC. THIS WORK MUST
BE COORDINATED AND VERIFIED PRIOR TO BIDDING.
16. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND VERIFY WITH THE RESPECTIVE TRADES
THE SIZES AND LOCATIONS OF MECHANICAL AND/OR ELECTRICAL PENETRATIONS, LOCATIONS
OF FIRE TREATED BACKING/BLOCKING REQUIRED FOR MOUNTING ELECTRICAL AND/OR
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, AS WELL AS CUTTING AND PATCHING FOR WORK REQUIRED BY
MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL.
17. WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED IN AN AREA, THOROUGHLY CLEAN THE SPACES, ITEMS &
SURFACES OF SOIL, WASTE MATERIAL, SMUDGES, SPATTERS, MISAPPLIED MATERIAL, SPOTS,
STAINS, AND THE LIKE, WITHOUT DAMAGING THE MATERIALS AND SURFACES INVOLVED.
18. PROVIDE SEMI RECESSED FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE CODES AND
ORDINANCES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
19. ALL DOORS, FRAMES, HARDWARE, LIGHTING AND CEILING MATERIALS ARE TO FOLLOW
BUILDING STANDARDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
20. PROVIDE FIRE TREATED BLOCKING IN WALLS AS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF MILLWORK,
FURNITURE AND ACCESSORIES.
21. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY BUILDING STANDARDS WITH BUILDING MANAGER.
ALL HARDWARE SETS AND KEYING TO BE COORDINATED WITH BUILDING MANAGERS.
22. ALL INTERIOR GLASS MUST COMPLY W/ APPLICABLE CODES FOR DESIGN LOADS & SAFETY
GLAZING.
23. ALL MATERIALS USED IN PLENUM AREAS MUST BE NON-COMBUSTIBLE AND / OR LISTED FOR
PLENUM USE AS DEFINED BY THE STATE & LOCAL CODES. IT WILL BE THE CONTRACTORS
RESPONSIBILITY TO ADHERE TO THESE REQUIREMENTS.
24. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO FIRE CAULK ALL NEW AND EXISTING
PENETRATIONS WITHIN WALL PARTITIONS, ABOVE THE CEILING, AS INDICATED BY THE
APPLICABLE CODES.
25. DEFERRED SUBMITTALS: DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
TO THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD AND WILL BE REVIEWED FOR GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH
THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. SUBMITTALS FOUND TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
DESIGN INTENT WILL BE STAMPED AS REVIEWED AND FORWARDED TO THE AUTHORITY
HAVING JURISDICTION IN KEEPING WITH MN CODE SECTION 1300.013 SUBSECTION 9B.
SUBMITTALS NOT FOUND IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN INTENT WILL BE RETURNED
TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR REVISION AND RESUBMITTAL. REVISED DOCUMENTATION WILL BE
REVIEWED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE AND SUBMISSION TO THE
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.
DEFERRED SUBMITTALS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
A. MECHANICAL DRAWINGS (PREPARED BY DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR)
B. PLUMBING DRAWINGS (PREPARED BY DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR)
C. ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS (PREPARED BY DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR)
D. FIRE SUPPRESSION DRAWINGS (PREPARED BY DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR)
E. STRUCTURAL STEEL
F. STEEL JOIST AND DECKING
G. MISCELLANEOUS METALS STEEL STAIRS AND LANDINGS
H. COLD FORMED METAL FRAMING
FINISHES
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH AND REPAIR ANY AND ALL FLOORS, WALLS, CEILINGS, ETC. IN
A WORKMANSHIP-LIKE MANNER TO MATCH THE SURROUNDING SURFACE AREAS. SURFACES
OR MATERIALS DAMAGED BY DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED, RESTORED
AND REFINISHED TO MATCH THE EXISTING, UNLESS NOTED OR SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. IN
ADDITION THOSE EXISTING SURFACES OR MATERIALS (SERVING AS A SUBSTRATE FOR NEW
MATERIALS OR FINISHES) WHICH HAVE BEEN DAMAGED FROM ANY CAUSE, SHALL BE
REPAIRED, RESTORED, PROPERLY PREPARED AND CLEANED TO RECEIVE THE NEW MATERIALS
AND FINISH WORK. ALL NEW MATERIALS & FINISH WORK TO BE FREE FROM FLAWS &
DEFECTS.
2. PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING FLOOR SLAB AS REQUIRED FOR A SMOOTH AND LEVEL SURFACE
FREE OF DEFECTS. FILL ALL CRACKS AND HOLES AND LEVEL DEPRESSIONS WITH MATERIALS
COMPATIBLE WITH THE FLOOR AND SLAB AS RECOMMENDED BY THE FLOORING
MANUFACTURER.
3. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING LEAD TIMES OF ALL MATERIALS
SUCH THAT MATERIALS ARE ON SITE WHEN REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION.
4. ALL PREPARATION, STORING, INSTALLATION AND CLEANUP OF FINISHES TO CONFORM TO
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
5. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING THE CONCRETE SUBFLOOR FOR
MOISTURE PRIOR TO THE FLOORING INSTALLATION. IN ADDITION, THE GENERAL
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROVING AND VERIFYING THAT THE TESTS HAVE BEEN
PERFORMED PER ASTM STANDARDS. SHOULD THE FLOORING SUBCONTRACTOR BE ASSIGNED
TO TEST THE CONCRETE SUBFLOOR, THEY WILL NEED TO PROVIDE TO THE GENERAL
CONTRACTOR ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THESE TESTS, INCLUDING BUT
NOT LIMITED TO:
A. NUMBER OF TESTS
B. DIAGRAM OF TEST LOCATIONS
C. ACCLIMATION PERIOD BEFORE RESULTS ARE RECORDED
D. TEST RESULTS, AND THE AMBIENT CONDITIONS THE TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN
AFTER CONFIRMATION THAT THE TESTED CONDITIONS MEET BOTH THE REFERENCED AND
MANUFACTURER’S STANDARDS, THE SUBCONTRACTOR MAY PROCEED WITH THE
INSTALLATION OF THE FLOORING PER MANUFACTURER’S SPECIFICATIONS.
MECHANICAL
1. THE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGN ALL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND OBTAIN
NECESSARY PERMITS. MECHANICAL DOCUMENTS ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY THE MECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR AND SIGNED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY CODE. THE
MECHANICAL DESIGN IS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE ATTACHED ARCHITECTURAL
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. THE DESIGN IS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE TENANT PRIOR TO
IMPLEMENTATION.
2. THE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT AND CONTROLS TO COMPLETE THE JOB. THE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO
COORDINATE W/ THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR ALL THE NECESSARY WIRING TO COMPLETE
THE JOB. THE WIRING IS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR.
3. PROVIDE WHITE SEMI RECESSED SPRINKLER HEADS W/ WHITE TRIM RING @ ALL ACT. CEILING
AND FULLY RECESSED SPRINKLER HEADS W/ WHITE ESCUTCHEON PLATES @ ALL GYP. CEILING
AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES.
4. VERIFY LOCATION AND SIZES OF ALL OPENINGS WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO
COMMENCING WORK. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO CUT & PATCH OR ADD
STRUCTURAL REINFORCING AS REQ'D FOR THE INSTALLATION OF MECHANICAL ROOFTOP
EQUIPMENT.
5. ALL SINKS SHALL HAVE HOT AND COLD WATER WITH BELOW COUNTER PIPE INSULATION
WRAP ON EXPOSED PIPING PER ADA GUIDELINES.
6. PROVIDE AND INSTALL AN APPROPRIATE SIZED WATER HEATER AS REQUIRED.
7. THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE A CLEAN-OUT PLAN FOR REVIEW AND
APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PLUMBING LINES ARE INSTALLED.
ELECTRICAL
1. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGN ALL ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS AND OBTAIN
NECESSARY PERMITS. THE ELECTRICAL DESIGN IS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE ATTACHED
ARCHITECTURAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. THE ELECTRICAL DESIGN IS TO BE REVIEWED
BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD AND TENANT PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION.
2. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF ALL MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT AND TO PROVIDE DISCONNECT AND POWER WIRING FOR ALL MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT.
3. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE EXIT AND EMERGENCY LIGHTS AS REQUIRED BY
APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES.
4. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE SMOKE DETECTION AND ALARM DEVICES AND
WIRING OF THE SPACE AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES FOR THE
INTERIOR BUILD-OUT SPACE.
5. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL JUNCTION BOXES W/ PULL STRING FOR ALL
VOICE / DATA AND PHONE LOCATIONS. THE TENANT IS TO COORDINATE & PROVIDE ALL LOW
VOLTAGE CABLING AND COVER PLATES AS REQUIRED.
6. NEW ELECTRICAL OUTLETS ARE SHOWN AT APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. NO OUTLETS ARE TO
BE BACK TO BACK.
7. ALL UNDER CABINET LIGHTING IS TO BE CONTROLLED BY A WALL SWITCH.
8. THE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY REGARDING LOCATION, QUANTITIES,
AND TYPES OF LIGHT FIXTURES. THE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN REFERENCES LIGHT FIXTURES,
HOWEVER THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY THE FIXTURE TYPE,
APPROPRIATE FOOTCANDLES AND VOLTAGE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL SPECIFIED LIGHT
FIXTURES IN ASSOCIATION W/ THE SPECIFIC SITE CONDITIONS AND PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS
FOR REVIEW & APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ORDERING OR INSTALLATION OF ANY FIXTURES.
INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) 2012
AMENDMENTS IN MSBC: CHAPTER 1300 2015
AMENDMENTS IN MSBC: CHAPTER 1341 2015
AMENDMENTS IN MSBC: CHAPTER 1307 2015
INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (IFC) 2012
INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL AND FUEL GAS CODE 2012
AMENDMENTS IN MSBC: CHAPTER 1346 2015
STATE BUILDING CODE (MSBC) 2015
MN PLUMBING CODE 2015
MN ENERGY CODE 2015
ASHRAE 90.1-2010 CRITERIA
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 2017
MN STATE FIRE CODE 2015
FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION: FULLY SPRINKLED
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: II-B
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B, A-3, S-1
FIRE RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION:
CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS:
EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS 0
INTERIOR BEARING WALLS 0
EXTERIOR NON-BEARING WALLS 0
STRUCTURAL FRAME 0
PARTITIONS- PERMANENT 0
SHAFT ENCLOSURES 0
FLOOR- CEILINGS/FLOORS 0
ROOFS- CEILING/ROOFS 0
EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS N.A.
SHEET INDEX
SHEET # SHEET DESCRIPTION CI
T
Y
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
-
0
8
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
8
GENERAL
A000 SHEET COVER ●
1 OF 3 SITE SURVEY ●
2 OF 3 SITE SURVEY ●
3 OF 3 SITE SURVEY ●
1 OF 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT ●
CIVIL
C1 REMOVALS & TREE PRESERVATION PLAN ●
C2 SITE & SIGNAGE PLAN ●
C3 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN ●
C4 EROSION CONTROL PLAN ●
C5 UTILITY PLAN ●
C6 SANITARY SEWER PLAN & PROFILE ●
C7 DETAILS ●
C8 DETAILS ●
C9 DETAILS ●
LANDSCAPE
L1.1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN ●
L1.2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS AND NOTES ●
ARCHITECTURAL
A200 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ●
A201-A FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - OFFICE AREA ●
A201-B FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - TRAINING AREA ●
A202 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - OFFICE AREA ●
A300 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS ●
A330 3D VIEWS ●
ELECTRICAL
E101 SITE ELECTRIC PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ●
ZONING DISTRICT: B - BUSINESS
PERMITTED USE: OFFICE/WAREHOUSE
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 3 ACRES (2 ACRES WITH SHARED INFRASTRUCTURE)
PROVIDED LOT SIZE: 15.97 ACRES
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 175'
PROVIDED LOT WIDTH: 631'
MINIMUM LOT DEPTH: 175'
PROVIDED LOT DEPTH: 1,288'
SETBACKS (BUILDING)
FRONT SETBACK: 40'
SIDE SETBACK: 25' OR 15' WITH INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT
REAR SETBACK: 25' OR 15' WITH INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT
TO RESIDENTIAL: 100' (OR 75' WITH 70% BUFFER)
SETBACKS (PARKING)
FRONT: 25'
SIDE: 15'
REAR: 15'
TO RESIDENTIAL: 100' (OR 60' WITH 70% BUFFER)
MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS:70% (80% IF INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT)
MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 30'; 35' IF SPRINKLED; 45' WITH FIRE MARSHALL APPROVAL
ESTIMATED WATER USAGE: 7,500 GALLONS PER DAY
ESTIMATED SANITARY USAGE: 6,800 GALLONS PER DAY
BUILDING AREA:
LOWER LEVEL: 22,818 GSF
FIRST FLOOR: 59,931 GSF
SECOND FLOOR: 40,705 GSF
TOTAL: 123,454 GSF
STALL SIZE: 9' X 19'
AISLE WIDTH: 22' MINIMUM
PARKING REQUIREMENT:
OFFICE: 1/250 SF
WAREHOUSE: 1/2000 SF PLUS ONE PER EMPLOYEE ON LARGEST SHIFT
ASSEMBLY: 1/4 SEATS
PARKING CALCULATION:
OFFICE: 91,357 GSF / 250 = 365 STALLS REQUIRED
WAREHOUSE: 22,818 GSF / 2000 = 12 STALLS REQUIRED (EMPLOYEES ARE COUNTED IN OFFICE)
ASSEMBLY: 800 SEATS / 4 SEATS PER STALL = 200 STALLS
NOTE: ASSEMBLY SPACES ARE USED BY THE SAME EMPLOYEES COUNTED IN THE OFFICE
CALCULATION ABOVE OR BY OCCUPANTS ALREADY IN BUILDING ONE, SO THERE IS NO
ADDITIONAL PARKING LOAD FOR THE PROJECT.
REQ'D STALLS: 377
PROVIDED: 334
PARKING NEED ON DAY ONE WILL BE 250. OVER 5 YEARS CENSUS IN BUILDING 2 WILL INCREASE
TO 400. INTENT IS TO EXPAND PARKING TO THE NORTH AS NEEDED TO HANDLE DEMAND AS THE
COMPANY GROWS. A PROOF OF PARKING PLAN CAN BE DEVELOPED IF NEEDED.
REGARDING OFFICE SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS, NOTE THAT THE 91,357 GROSS SQUARE
FEET LISTED ABOVE INCLUDES ALL OF THE CONFERENCE AREAS WITHIN THE OFFICE
ENVIRONMENT. THESE SPACES WOULD BE OCCUPIED BY THE SAME PEOPLE ON THE OFFICE
FLOOR, SO THE CALCULATION FOR OFFICE PARKING IS ARTIFICIALLY INFLATED.
X
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
SMN
AMT
AUGUST 10, 2018
3701.13
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
Open Systems
International,
Building #2
New Construction
Project Building Name
Arrowhead Road
Medina, MN 55340
NO
T
F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
REGISTRATION NUMBER:51317REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
ADAM M. THIELE, PE
REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors
3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303
763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
C2
SITE & SIGNAGE
PLAN
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
X
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
SMN
AMT
AUGUST 10, 2018
3701.13
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
Open Systems
International,
Building #2
New Construction
Project Building Name
Arrowhead Road
Medina, MN 55340
NO
T
F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
REGISTRATION NUMBER:51317REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
ADAM M. THIELE, PE
REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors
3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303
763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
C1
REMOVALS & TREE
PRESERVATION PLAN
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
X
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
SMN
AMT
AUGUST 10, 2018
3701.13
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
Open Systems
International,
Building #2
New Construction
Project Building Name
Arrowhead Road
Medina, MN 55340
NO
T
F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
REGISTRATION NUMBER:51317REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
ADAM M. THIELE, PE
REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors
3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303
763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
C3
GRADING & DRAINAGE
PLAN
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
X
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
SMN
AMT
AUGUST 10, 2018
3701.13
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
Open Systems
International,
Building #2
New Construction
Project Building Name
Arrowhead Road
Medina, MN 55340
NO
T
F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
REGISTRATION NUMBER:51317REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
ADAM M. THIELE, PE
REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors
3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303
763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
C5
UTILITY PLAN
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
UP
A
B
C
UP
A3001
A300 3
A B C D E F G H
1
2
3
4
5
6
2272 SF
FITNESS AREA
162
1154 SF
IT VAULT
163
750 SF
MECHANICAL / ELECTRICAL
164
N
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
NO
T
FOR
CONSTRU
CTION
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
7
4
2
8
_
O
p
e
n
_
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
_
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
-
2
_
n
m
i
ss
l
i
n
g
.
r
v
t
A200
LOWER LEVEL
FLOOR PLAN
S. OLIVER
N. MISSLING
08/10/2018
17428.0OSI
K:/JOBS/OPEN SYSTEMS
CITY SUBMITTAL
OPEN SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL,
BUILDING #2
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
3/32" = 1'-0"A200
1 LOWER LEVEL - WAREHOUSE
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/2018
UP
UP
DN
UP
A
B
C
GENERAL PROJECT NOTES
1. OWNER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT SUPPLIERS ARE TO COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION OF
EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION WITH THE OWNER.
2. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR & CABLE CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY
DAMAGE CAUSED TO WALLS, FINISHES, CEILINGS ETC. IN THE COURSE OF THEIR
CONSTRUCTION. IF CONTRACTORS BEGIN WORK IN AN AREA WITH EXISTING DAMAGE THEY
ARE TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
3. SHADING INDICATES AREA THAT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF WORK.
282' - 0"
13
4
'
-
0
"
A B C D E F G H
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
244 SF
MEDIUM
CONFERENCE
1
405 SF
LARGE
CONFERENCE
2 476 SF
LARGE
CONFERENCE
3 244 SF
MEDIUM
CONFERENCE
4
1872 SF
BREAK ROOM
7
10406 SF
STAGING
8
278 SF
CATERING KITCHEN
9
89 SF
JANITOR
10
104 SF
STORAGE
12
100 SF
PRIVATE
16
115 SF
OFFICE
19
115 SF
OFFICE
20
115 SF
OFFICE
21
115 SF
OFFICE
22
115 SF
OFFICE
23
115 SF
OFFICE
24
198 SF
EXEC OFFICE
25
112 SF
ENCLAVE
26
112 SF
OFFICE
28
112 SF
OFFICE
29
234 SF
EXEC OFFICE
30
112 SF
OFFICE
31
112 SF
OFFICE
32
112 SF
OFFICE
33
112 SF
OFFICE
34
206 SF
EXEC OFFICE
35 112 SF
ENCLAVE
36
112 SF
ENCLAVE
37
112 SF
ENCLAVE
38
207 SF
EXEC OFFICE
39
112 SF
OFFICE
40
112 SF
OFFICE
41
196 SF
EXEC OFFICE
42
117 SF
OFFICE
43
117 SF
OFFICE
44
117 SF
OFFICE
45
117 SF
OFFICE
46
117 SF
ENCLAVE
47
116 SF
OFFICE
51
116 SF
OFFICE
52
116 SF
OFFICE
53
116 SF
OFFICE
54
116 SF
OFFICE
55
77 SF
PRIVATE
RESTROOM
59
77 SF
PRIVATE
RESTROOM
60
C.4 C.8 D.8 E.8 F.3
73 SF
SERVICE
ELEVATOR
63
99 SF
COATS
64
392 SF
WOMEN'S RESTROOM
72
144 SF
IT SERVER
73
307 SF
IT MECHANICAL
74
229 SF
WORK ROOM
75
56 SF
STORAGE
77
172 SF
SMALL
CONFERENCE
78
47 SF
COATS
80
50 SF
ELEV
79
220 SF
MEDIUM
CONFERENCE
149
87 SF
PRIVATE
151
130 SF
ELEC /
COMMS.
152
220 SF
MEDIUM
CONFERENCE
153
116 SF
OFFICE
157
116 SF
OFFICE
158
115 SF
OFFICE
159107 SF
STORAGE
160
364 SF
KITCHENETTE
161
116 SF
OFFICE
169
116 SF
OFFICE
170
116 SF
OFFICE
171
116 SF
OFFICE
172
116 SF
OFFICE
173
24
'
-
9
5
/
8
"
5' - 0" 15' - 0" 5' - 0" 15' - 0" 10' - 0" 15' - 0"6' - 2 3/8"
71' - 2 3/8"
9'
-
0
"
1
5
'
-
0
"
7
'
-
0
"
2
4
'
-
0
"
9
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
4
'
-
0
"
1'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0"
1' - 0"
4' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0"
1' - 0"
4' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0"
1' - 0"
4' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 7' - 8" 3' - 4" 20' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 40' - 0"40' - 0"
1' - 0"
112 SF
OFFICE
199
BUILDING USE
WAREHOUSE - LOWER LEVEL
FITNESS AREA - LOWER LEVEL
TOTAL
TYPE SQ.
FEET
OCC.
FACTOR
OCC.
LOAD
2 EXITS
REQUIRED
S-1 19,850 USF 500 40
A-3 50 46 N
2,296
Y
CODE REVIEW
1. COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL IS LESS THAN 0'-0" LONG
NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGES FOR BUILDING PERMIT ONLY, NOT FOR LEASING
2,272 USF
SUBTOTAL - LOWER LEVEL - - 86 -22,122 USF
TRAINING AREA - FIRST LEVEL A-3 7 1,326 Y9,279 USF
OFFICE AREA - FIRST LEVEL B 100 493 Y49,273 USF
SUBTOTAL - FIRST LEVEL - - 1,819 -58,552 USF
OFFICE AREA - SECOND LEVEL B 100 391 Y39,040 USF
119,714 USF
N
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
NO
T
FOR
CONSTRU
CTION
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
7
4
2
8
_
O
p
e
n
_
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
_
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
-
2
_
n
m
i
ss
l
i
n
g
.
r
v
t
A201-A
FIRST LEVEL FLOOR
PLAN - OFFICE
AREA
S. OLIVER
N. MISSLING
08/10/2018
17428.0OSI
K:/JOBS/OPEN SYSTEMS
CITY SUBMITTAL
OPEN SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL,
BUILDING #2
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES
TAG KEYNOTE
1 -
2 -
3/32" = 1'-0"A201-A
1 1ST LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN - OFFICE AREA
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/2018
UP
DNDNDN
DNDN
A B C D E F G H
7
8
9
10
11
12
C.4 C.8 D.8 E.8 F.3
184 SF
STORAGE
61
228 SF
STORAGE
62
1'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
8
'
-
6
"
3
1
'
-
1
0
"
40
'
-
0
"
38
'
-
2
"
2'
-
2
"
13
'
-
1
0
"
1' - 0"
15' - 0"
4' - 0"
36' - 0"40' - 0"
4' - 0"
19' - 0"
1' - 0"
1559 SF
TRAINING
65
1558 SF
TRAINING
66
1540 SF
TRAINING
67
1541 SF
TRAINING
68
1541 SF
TRAINING
69
1540 SF
TRAINING
70
392 SF
MEN'S RESTROOM
71 392 SF
WOMEN'S RESTROOM
72
130 SF
OFFICE
73
130 SF
OFFICE
74
130 SF
OFFICE
75
130 SF
OFFICE
77
130 SF
OFFICE
78
130 SF
OFFICE
79
120' - 0"
14
6
'
-
0
"
122 SF
VENDING
180
24' - 9 5/8"
N
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
NO
T
FOR
CONSTRU
CTION
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
7
4
2
8
_
O
p
e
n
_
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
_
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
-
2
_
n
m
i
ss
l
i
n
g
.
r
v
t
A201-B
FIRST LEVEL FLOOR
PLAN - TRAINING
AREA
S. OLIVER
N. MISSLING
08/10/2018
17428.0OSI
K:/JOBS/OPEN SYSTEMS
CITY SUBMITTAL
OPEN SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL,
BUILDING #2
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
3/32" = 1'-0"A201-B
1 1ST LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN - TRAINING WING
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/2018
DN
DN
A
B
C
A B C D E F G H
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
17' - 8" x 28' - 8"
LARGE
CONFERENCE
17
17' - 8" x 28' - 8"
LARGE
CONFERENCE
18
14' - 0" x 17' - 8"
MEDIUM
CONFERENCE
23
11' - 9" x 15' - 4"
LAB
24
11' - 9" x 15' - 4"
LAB
25
588 SF
LARGE
CONFERENCE
26
583 SF
LARGE
CONFERENCE
27
920 SF
EXECUTIVE
CONFERENCE
28
104 SF
WORK ROOM
56
C.4 C.8 D.8 E.8 F.3
120 SF
OFFICE
81
120 SF
OFFICE
82
120 SF
OFFICE
83
120 SF
OFFICE
84
120 SF
OFFICE
85
120 SF
OFFICE
86
200 SF
EXEC OFFICE
87
112 SF
OFFICE
88
112 SF
OFFICE
89
112 SF
ENCLAVE
90
112 SF
ENCLAVE
91
231 SF
EXEC OFFICE
92
112 SF
OFFICE
93
112 SF
OFFICE
94
112 SF
ENCLAVE
95
112 SF
ENCLAVE
96
112 SF
ENCLAVE
97
112 SF
OFFICE
98
112 SF
OFFICE
99
211 SF
EXEC OFFICE
100
112 SF
OFFICE
101
112 SF
OFFICE
102
112 SF
OFFICE
103
112 SF
OFFICE
104
170 SF
EXEC OFFICE
105
112 SF
OFFICE
106
112 SF
OFFICE
107
112 SF
OFFICE
108
112 SF
OFFICE
109
112 SF
OFFICE
110
112 SF
OFFICE
111
237 SF
EXEC OFFICE
112
113 SF
ENCLAVE
114
113 SF
ENCLAVE
115
113 SF
ENCLAVE
116
113 SF
OFFICE
117
113 SF
OFFICE
118
113 SF
OFFICE
119
113 SF
OFFICE
120
124 SF
ENCLAVE
121
124 SF
ENCLAVE
122119 SF
OFFICE
123
120 SF
OFFICE
124
120 SF
OFFICE
125
119 SF
OFFICE
126
116 SF
OFFICE
127
116 SF
OFFICE
128
116 SF
OFFICE
129
116 SF
OFFICE
130
116 SF
OFFICE
131
184 SF
SM CONFERENCE
132
184 SF
SM CONFERENCE
133
184 SF
SM CONFERENCE
134
184 SF
SM CONFERENCE
135
73 SF
SERVICE
ELEVATOR
136
433 SF
KITCHENETTE
137
79 SF
PRIVATE
RESTROOM
139
79 SF
PRIVATE
RESTROOM
140
96 SF
PRIVATE
141
223 SF
WOMEN'S
RESTROOM
142
110 SF
ELECTRICAL /
COMMUNICATIONS
144
50 SF
ELEV.
147
236 SF
MEDIUM
CONFERENCE
165
405 SF
LARGE
CONFERENCE
166 488 SF
LARGE
CONFERENCE
167 244 SF
MEDIUM
CONFERENCE
168
116 SF
OFFICE
174
116 SF
OFFICE
175
116 SF
OFFICE
176
116 SF
OFFICE
177
116 SF
OFFICE
178
78 SF
PRIVATE
179
117 SF
STORAGE
192
57 SF
JANITOR
193
319 SF
MEN'S RESTROOM
194
121 SF
PRIVATE
195
211 SF
SMALL CONFERENCE
196
236 SF
MEDIUM CONFERENCE
197
213 SF
EXEC OFFICE
198
N
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
NO
T
FOR
CONSTRU
CTION
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
7
4
2
8
_
O
p
e
n
_
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
_
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
-
2
_
n
m
i
ss
l
i
n
g
.
r
v
t
A202
SECOND LEVEL
FLOOR PLAN -
OFFICE AREA
S. OLIVER
N. MISSLING
08/10/2018
17428.0OSI
K:/JOBS/OPEN SYSTEMS
CITY SUBMITTAL
OPEN SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL,
BUILDING #2
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
3/32" = 1'-0"A202
1 2ND LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN - OFFICE AREA
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/2018
BRK-1 BRICK TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDING
EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND
PC-2 PRECAST CONCRETE WITH LIGHT SANDBLAST FINISH
COLOR: WHITE
MTL-1 CENTRIA IW-30A METAL WALL PANELS
COLOR: SILVER METALLIC
MTL-3 PREFINISHED METAL TRIM
COLOR: SILVER METALLIC
PC-1 PRECAST CONCRETE WITH ACID ETCH FINISH
COLOR: GRAY
MTL-2 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM COMPOSITE PANELS
COLOR: SILVER METALLIC
MATERIAL AREA (SQ FT) PERCENTAGE ALLOWED
GLASS 12,567 26.4%
> 20%
BRICK 17,054 35.8%
CONCRETE 14,700 30.8% < 80%
METAL 2,980 6.3% < 20%
OTHER 345 0.7% N/A
TOTAL 47,646 100%
EXTERIOR MATERIALS PERCENTAGE
1ST LEVEL
100' - 0"
Roof
133' - 4"
2ND LEVEL
116' - 0"
T.O. PARAPET
138' - 0"
123456789101112
LOWER LEVEL
86' - 0"
BRK-1
PC-1
MTL-2
MTL-3
MTL-2 MTL-3
BRK-1
PC-1
PC-2
PC-2 MTL-1
MTL-2
1ST LEVEL
100' - 0"
Roof
133' - 4"
2ND LEVEL
116' - 0"
T.O. PARAPET
138' - 0"
ABCDEFGH
LOWER LEVEL
86' - 0"
MTL-1
BRK-1
PC-1
PC-2
BRK-1
PC-1
PC-2
MTL-2
MTL-1
MTL-3
MTL-2MTL-3
MTL-2
1ST LEVEL
100' - 0"
Roof
133' - 4"
2ND LEVEL
116' - 0"
T.O. PARAPET
138' - 0"
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
LOWER LEVEL
86' - 0"
PC-1
BRK-1
PC-2
PC-2
MTL-1
MTL-2
MTL-3
MTL-1
MTL-2
PC-1
BRK-1
MTL-2
MTL-3
1ST LEVEL
100' - 0"
Roof
133' - 4"
2ND LEVEL
116' - 0"
T.O. PARAPET
138' - 0"
A B C D E F G H
LOWER LEVEL
86' - 0"
C.4 C.8 D.8 E.8 F.3
PC-1
BRK-1
PC-2
MTL-1
BRK-3 MTL-2
PC-2
MTL-3
PC-1
BRK-1
MTL-2
PC-2
BRK-1
PC-1
MTL-2 MTL-3
MTL-2
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
NO
T
FOR
CONSTRU
CTION
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
7
4
2
8
_
O
p
e
n
_
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
_
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
-
2
_
n
m
i
ss
l
i
n
g
.
r
v
t
A300
EXTERIOR
BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
S. OLIVER
N. MISSLING
08/10/2018
17428.0OSI
K:/JOBS/OPEN SYSTEMS
CITY SUBMITTAL
OPEN SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL,
BUILDING #2
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
3/32" = 1'-0"A300
1 EAST ELEVATION
3/32" = 1'-0"A300
2 NORTH ELEVATION
3/32" = 1'-0"A300
3 WEST ELEVATION
3/32" = 1'-0"A300
4 SOUTH ELEVATION
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/2018
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
NO
T
FOR
CONSTRU
CTION
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
7
4
2
8
_
O
p
e
n
_
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
_
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
-
2
_
n
m
i
ss
l
i
n
g
.
r
v
t
A330
3D VIEWS
Checker
Author
08/10/2018
17428.0OSI
K:/JOBS/OPEN SYSTEMS
CITY SUBMITTAL
OPEN SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL,
BUILDING #2
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
C:\Users\nmissling\Desktop\Revit Exports to Share\MH_30x42-OSII-MH-Logo-BW-Print-1327047.jpg
N
HIGHWAY 55
")55
")24
")19
")101
")116
")11
")24
")19
£¤12
HAMEL RD
MEDINA RD
PIONEER TRL
TAMARACK DR
WILLOW DR
HACKAMORE RD
ARROWHEAD DR
HOMESTEAD TRL
CHIPPEWA RD
HUNTER DR
PARKVIEW DR
BROCKTON LN N
MEANDER RD
EVERGREEN RD
BROCKTON LN N
CHIPPEWA RD
WILLOW DR
WILLOW DR
HUNTER DR
")55
Medina Golf &
Country Club
YMCA -
Camp Ihduhapi
Spring Hill
Golf Club
Baker Park Reserve
Baker Park Reserve
Wolsfeld Woods (SNA)
Lake Independence Regional Trail
North-South 1 Regional Trail Search Corridor
Lake Sarah Regional Trail Search Corridor
Lake Sarah Regional Trail Search Corridor
Resubmitted for Metropolitan Council ReviewMap Date: January 5, 2018
Scale: 1:32,000[0 0.5 10.25 Mile
Map 6-1Park and Trail Plan
Location of proposed trail segmentsare intended to identify connectionsand cooridors, not exact locations.
Legend
Trails
Existing Paved Trail
Existing Shoulder Trail
Existing Turf Trail
Existing Sidewalk
Proposed Paved Trail
Proposed Shoulder Trail
Proposed Turf Trail
Future Park Search Area
Parks
Existing Park
Potential Park Expansion
Regional Corridors
Regional Trail Search Corridor
Project: LR‐18‐232 – OSI Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review
The following documents are all part of the official record of the above referenced request, even if some documents are not attached, or are
only attached in part, to Planning Commission and City Council reports. All documents are available for review upon request at City Hall.
Documents Submitted by Applicant:
Document Received
Date
Document
Date
# of
pages
Electronic Paper
Copy?
Notes
Application 8/10/2018 8/10/2018 3 Application Y
Fee 8/10/2018 8/8/2018 1 Deposit Y $11,000
Narrative 8/10/2018 8/10/2018 1 Narrative Y
Building Uses/Summary 8/10/2018 8/10/2018 1 Building Uses Y
Wetland Information 8/10/2018 10/8/2013 17 Wetland Info Y
Plans 8/10/2018 8/10/2018 23 Plans‐8‐10‐2018 Y
Plans‐8‐17‐2018 8/17/2018 8/17/2018 9 Plans‐8‐17‐2018 Y Civil only
Plans‐8‐29‐2018 8/29/2018 8/29/2018 23 Plans‐8‐29‐2018 Y
Stormwater Plans 8/17/2018 8/17/2018 141 Stormwater Y
Stormwater Plans 9/5/2018 8/28/2018 156 Stormwater8‐28 Y
Documents from Staff/Consultants/Agencies
Document Document
Date
# of
pages
Electronic Notes
Engineering Comments 8/24/2018 4 EngComments‐8‐24‐2018
Engineering Comments 9/6/2018 5 EngComments‐9‐6‐2018
Traffic Comments 9/6/2018 5 TrafficComments
Legal Comments 8/22/2018 1 LegalComments
Building official Comments 8/17/2018 1 MWComments
Fire Dept Markup 8/24/2018 1 Fire Markup
Planning Commission Report 9/6/2018 12 Y 44 pages w/ attachments
City Council Report 9/13/2018 Y
(continued on back)
Public Comments
Document Date Electronic Notes
Planning Commission minutes 9/11/2018 PC Minutes
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 9/11/2018 Meeting Minutes
1
Public Hearing – Open Systems International (OSI) – PID 03-118-23-41-0005 – Rezoning to
Business, Preliminary Plat, and Site Plan Review for the Construction of a Two-Story Office –
North of 4101 Arrowhead Drive
Finke presented a request from OSI to construct a 125,500 square foot building, to be predominantly
office with a smaller warehouse and training portion. He stated that this action would require three land
use approvals, presented in the order in which staff suggests they be considered as some actions are
contingent upon others – rezoning, subdivision followed by the Site Plan review. He stated that staff is
asking the Commission to focus on the rezoning request, as changes will be made to the Site Plan and
Preliminary Plat. He stated that the site layout is based on the requirements of the Business District and
therefore the remaining actions will be contingent upon the rezoning. He identified the subject site, north
of the existing OSI facility, and reviewed the surrounding land uses. He stated that the subject property is
guided for business in the 2020-2030 Comprehensive Plan and was previously designated for mixed use.
He stated that because of the previous designation, the property is zoned mixed use. He stated that zoning
would be inconsistent with the recently approved Comprehensive Plan and therefore absent the request
from the applicant, the City would need to rezone the parcel to Business or Business Park within the next
nine months. He reviewed similarities and differences between the different business districts. He stated
that the applicant is requesting the Business District for Lot 1 and did not request a zoning district for the
outlot. He stated that staff would recommend the Business Park District for the outlot. He stated that the
City has a good deal of discretion when rezoning properties and either the Business or Business Park
zoning would match the approved Comprehensive Plan.
Piper asked the current height of the existing OSI building.
Finke stated that he did not calculate that but noted that it is a two-story building with some exposed
lower level, which is similar to the proposal.
Steve Oliver, representing the applicant, stated that the floor heights of building one and two would be
matched.
Finke stated that the existing zoning for the existing building would allow up to 45 feet for height. He
provided details on the Preliminary Plat, which would propose to divide the outlot into two, one lot which
would include the proposed building and a remaining smaller outlot to the north. He reviewed the
comments from Engineering which included comments on transportation and utility infrastructure. He
noted that the Park Commission will discuss park dedication but believed that cash in lieu would be
recommended as there are not plans for parks in this area. He reviewed the details of the Site Plan and
noted that the training area would be utilized by employees already within buildings one and two. He
provided additional details on the proposed parking and proof of parking. He stated that the proposed
building design appears to meet the design standards within the proposed zoning district. He stated that
staff only recommends action on the rezoning as changes are still being made to the applicant’s plan.
Nester asked if there is a reason the entire site could not be zoned Business Park.
Finke responded that either Business or Business Park can be used to implement the Business land use,
depending on which the Planning Commission and Council find consistent with the objectives of the land
use and the purpose of the district.
White opened the public hearing at 7:33 p.m.
Tracy Lamberty, 4250 Arrowhead Drive, stated that she owns one of the two homes that will be most
impacted by this project. She stated that lighting is one of her biggest concerns as the lighting will be
coming closer to her home. She asked if the lighting has to be on 24 hours per day.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 9/11/2018 Meeting Minutes
2
Finke stated that the Code would not require 24-hour lighting and has requirements for the lighting
measured at the edge of the property.
Ms. Lamberty asked that the City require high berms on the residential border to provide a buffer between
the use and the adjacent residential property. She asked if the training facility would not have use 24
hours per day. She referenced the traffic increase on Arrowhead and the high speeds of the traffic under
existing conditions. She stated that the additional turn lane would increase the impact of the roadway to
the adjacent residential development. She asked the location of the driveway for the new facility.
Mr. Oliver replied the training would be generally during business hours and that the stakes on the
property mark the potential access point.
Ms. Lamberty asked if there would be a requirement for a second access.
Finke replied that the sites would be linked and therefore there would be a second access.
Ms. Lamberty asked if the building is going to sit on the hill as that would increase the height.
Mr. Oliver replied that the building would be constructed into the hill to lessen the visual impact.
White explained that the action tonight would simply address the rezoning and the Site Plan will come
forward at a future date and will include some of the more detailed information the resident is looking for.
Keith Meuller, 4495 Bluebell Trail S, stated that he has been through other requests where the enjoyment
and monetary value of his property have been impacted. He stated that when you purchase a home there
is a lot of public information available to a buyer about the zoning, which helps the buyer to make the
right investment in their future. He stated that when someone looks at a home in Bridgewater they drive
by two signs that say proposed land development, which has an impact on potential buyers. He stated
that he is not sure of the change to the Comprehensive Plan that designates the future use of the property
as business. He stated that it appears that the locomotive is already out of the gate and it would be hard to
slow this down. He commented that his best result would for the rezoning to not be approved, even
though he recognized that the change in zoning is identified in the long-range plan of the City. He
recognized that this request would most likely not impact the enjoyment or value of his property directly
but would impact the properties of the neighbors to the subject property, which in turn would have an
impact on the comparable values for real estate. He stated that if his wish to deny the rezoning could not
be granted, he would like to see it minimized to the extent possible. He noted that this development will
impact his commute. He stated that he is empathetic with a business that would like to continue to thrive
and grow but noted that he purchased his business within a Business District and therefore does not have
to infringe on residential properties abutting the property.
Ron Ingram, an owner of OSI, stated that he hears the concerns that people are describing and stated that
they will do everything they can to address. He noted that the Comprehensive Plan guides this property
for business. He asked the residents the type of business that they would like in their neighborhood and
believed that his business is the right fit. He stated that if it is not OSI, it is unknown to the type of
business that could come in.
Mr. Mueller stated that OSI could be a good neighbor but recognized that businesses sometimes change
hands and then it would be unknown what would happen.
White closed the public hearing at 7:47 p.m.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 9/11/2018 Meeting Minutes
3
Piper asked if the applicant could show how far into the property the new building would go.
Finke identified the proposed location of the building on the site as well as the proposed parking area in
relation to the property line.
Piper asked the location of the access.
Finke replied that would be on the north end of the lot and the outlot would remain north of that.
Piper asked how big the outlot may be.
Finke was unsure of the exact size of the outlot following the changes.
Reid noted that the northern outlot would remain undeveloped until a future date.
Nester commented that she believes that the entire site should be Business Park as that would fit in better
with the residential as it would lower the height of the building and require the berming.
Finke replied that under Business Park the maximum height would be 35 while the proposed height of the
building is 42 feet. He stated that the way that building height is calculated, the overall height would not
need to be lowered because of the way the building will be situated in the hill. He noted that the building
length could be increased, or additional lower level could be buried to lower the building height. He
noted that there is already a 70 percent requirement for opaque screening along Arrowhead.
Piper asked and received confirmation that the proposed building height would not be higher than the
existing building height.
White stated that it appears that the applicant is attempting to incorporate the design of the existing
building to ensure a cohesive look. She stated that with the original building there was a lot of pressure
for the applicant to create a prairie style that blends into the environment and is happy to see that
continuing and therefore is not concerned with the building height.
Reid asked if the parking lot lights are on 24 hours per day.
Mike Kuklok, OSI, replied that there are employees at the facility 24 hours per day and therefore it is
desired to have lighting in the parking lot for safety. He stated that they are looking at available
technologies and would use downcast lighting. He stated that the newer LED lighting allows the light
fixtures to be lowered.
White reviewed the staff memorandum, noting that the site has been guided for Business under the
approved Comprehensive Plan. She felt that due to the proximity of Arrowhead Drive, it would be
appropriate to have the zoning be Business based on the objectives outlined. She commented that the
outlot could be zoned for Business Park.
Nester stated that it will be business either way, the decision will be whether it is Business or Business
Park. She believed that Business Park would be preferable because of the proximity to residential
property and Business Park would provided better opportunities for buffering and screening.
Finke stated that the buffering requirement is the same for both districts.
Nester noted that the main difference would be the height difference of ten feet.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from DRAFT 9/11/2018 Meeting Minutes
4
Reid commented that would result in a larger building footprint. She noted that a future building to come
on the outlot would need to be a lower height. She commented that OSI has been a great addition to
Medina and has been a great business, therefore she is inclined to support the Business District. She
stated that it would help the applicant to consider lighting, berming, and screening when refining the Site
Plan to be a good neighbor to the residential properties. She also agreed that the outlot should be
Business Park, as that would provide transition.
Piper asked the number of additional employees.
Mr. Ingram confirmed that there would be additional employees hired, noting that it would be mostly
engineers and professionals. He estimated that perhaps 100 additional employees would be hired in the
beginning and over the next few years more staff would be hired. He estimated that the building would
be filled within five years and at that time OSI would look at the outlot.
Finke stated that the proposal is the same comparative height as the existing building, but because more of
the top level is exposed that impacts overall height calculation.
Mr. Oliver stated that one of the reasons the site is what is it is, is because the site has a fall of about 20
feet. He stated that they are taking advantage of the natural fall rather than attempting to bury the site
against the wetland. He stated that from the south and north the site will read as a two-story building.
Finke stated that the outlot is not included as part of the request from the applicant and therefore the City
would need to rezone the outlot in the future.
Motion by Reid, seconded by Piper, to recommend approval of the rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1,
Cavanaughs Meadowwoods Park to the Business Zoning District. Motion carries 3-1 (Nester opposed).
(Absent: Albers, Amic, and Williams)
Nester noted that she is opposed because she believes that Business Park would be a better zoning.
Nester noted that she believes the parcel should be zoned Business Park.
White noted that the Plat and Site Plan review would be considered at a future meeting.
Nester noted that there are trails marked future and she would like to see those included because of the
higher number of pedestrians in the area.
White asked that the applicant considers the public comments and noted that any improvements to
lighting and landscaping and berming would be appreciated.
Motion by Piper, seconded by Reid, to table consideration of the Preliminary Plat and Site Plan review
to allow the applicant to update plans. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Albers, Amic, and
Williams)
Finke stated that the City Council is scheduled to review the rezoning request at their meeting next
Tuesday and the remainder of the requests will be brought back to the Planning Commission at the next
meeting.
MEMORANDUM
1000 Twelve Oaks Center Drive Tel 952.426.7400
Suite 200 Fax 952.426.7440
Wayzata, MN 55391 www.mohagenhansen.com
MOHAGEN HANSEN
Architecture | Interiors
Date: August 10. 2018
Memo To: Dusty Finke, Planner
City of Medina
From: Design Team
Mohagen Hansen Architecture | Interiors
Project: Open Systems International: Building 2
Project No.: 17428.0OSI
Open Systems International, currently headquartered at 4101 Arrowhead Drive, needs to expand their software
development operations to house additional design and engineering teams as well as additional support spaces for
staff. The company continues to grow at an aggressive pace and is already busting at the seams in their existing
facility that was built in 2010.
As OSI looks to expand their operations in Medina, the proposed Building 2 is expected to include the same basic
programmatic uses as Building 1, but with the addition of a more robust space for conferencing. Primary
programmatic components include:
· Two-story main office building with basement under west half.
· Single-story southerly wing for conference center for up to 800 people (housing company-wide events).
· Office environment for up to 400 employees.
· Staging area for teaming and project specific testing and development.
· Warehouse space with 2 loading docks and drive-in door
Additional employee amenities include:
· Dedicated break room for Building 2 staff.
· Fitness center with locker rooms for use by entire campus.
· Coffee and Break-out spaces throughout the building.
· Connection to existing campus trail.
· Outdoor patio and yard spaces.
· Covered walkway between buildings.
From a design standpoint Building 2 will be complementary to Building 1, with matching brick, glass features and
other exterior accents, but with a different aesthetic expression for the two-story portion of the building. The site will
be developed in an integrated manner, connecting the parking lots, introducing a covered on-grade connector and
picking up on similar details for planting and site lighting.
OSI wishes to retain the northerly portion of the site as an outlot for future expansion for their needs or to develop or
sell for other business-related development in the future.
K:\JOBS\Open Systems\Building 2 17428\01_Admin\Corres\17428_M_Project Narrative - 081018.docx
BUILDING USES & AREAS
OPEN SYSTEMS BUILDING #2
MEDINA, MN
08/10/2018
SITE LOCATION
BUILDING USE
WAREHOUSE - LOWER LEVEL
FITNESS AREA - LOWER LEVEL
TOTAL
TYPE SQ.
FEET
OCC.
FACTOR
OCC.
LOAD
2 EXITS
REQUIRED
S-1 19,850 USF 500 40
A-3 50 46 N
2,296
Y
CODE REVIEW
1. COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL IS LESS THAN 0'-0" LONG
NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGES FOR BUILDING PERMIT ONLY, NOT FOR LEASING
2,272 USF
SUBTOTAL - LOWER LEVEL - - 86 -22,122 USF
TRAINING AREA - FIRST LEVEL A-3 7 1,326 Y9,279 USF
OFFICE AREA - FIRST LEVEL B 100 493 Y49,273 USF
SUBTOTAL - FIRST LEVEL - - 1,819 -58,552 USF
OFFICE AREA - SECOND LEVEL B 100 391 Y39,040 USF
119,714 USF
ZONING SUMMARY PARKING SUMMARY
1000 Twelve Oaks Center Drive
Suite 200, Wayzata, MN 55391
T: 952-426-7400
F: 952-426-7440
PR
O
J
E
C
T
CL
I
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
DA
T
E
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
H
A
S
E
PR
O
J
.
N
O
.
NEW CONSTRUCTION
MohagenHansen.com
OPEN SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL
4101 ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55430
OPEN SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, BUILDING #2
08/10/2018
17428.0OSI
OP
E
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
I
N
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
/
1
7
4
2
8
.
0
O
S
I
/
C
I
T
Y
S
UB
M
I
T
T
A
L
/
O
P
E
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
I
N
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
,
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
#
2
CITY SUBMITTALARROWHEAD DRIVE
AREA MAP
PROJECT GENERAL NOTES CONTINUEDPROJECT GENERAL NOTES
APPLICABLE CODES
OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENTS
I ACCEPT AND APPROVE THE INFORMATION PRESENTED
IN THIS DRAWING SET AS A REPRESENTATION OF OUR
DESIGN INTENT. SHOULD OWNER INITIATE CHANGES
THAT RESULT IN REVISIONS AND/OR MODIFICATIONS
ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICE FEES WILL BE CHANGED.
CLIENT APPROVAL
TITLE:
AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF:
NO
T
FOR
CONSTRU
CTION
CERTIFICATION
ARCHITECTURAL
1. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION, (AIA DOCUMENT A201,
CURRENT EDITION) IN ITS ENTIRETY, ARE PART OF THESE DOCUMENTS. ADDITIONAL NOTES
WITHIN THESE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT MEANT TO OVERRIDE ANY PART OF A201. CONTACT
ARCHITECT FOR A COPY OF A201, IF REQUIRED.
2. THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED PROJECT. UNLESS
OTHERWISE INDICATED, THEY DO NOT INDICATE THE MEANS OR METHOD OF
CONSTRUCTION.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN SUFFICIENT LIABILITY INSURANCE TO COVER WORKMAN'S
COMPENSATION, GENERAL LIABILITY AND CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY. A COPY SHALL BE FILED
WITH THE OWNER.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL WORK AND MATERIALS AS REQUIRED BY THE
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND
ORDINANCES.
5. THE CONTRACTOR WILL MAINTAIN BUILDER'S RISK INSURANCE ON THE FORM KNOWN AS "ALL
RISK" OR "MULTIPLE PERIL". THE CONTRACTOR, ALL SUBCONTRACTORS, ARCHITECTS AND
ENGINEERS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN EACH CAPACITY AS INSURED JOINTLY WITH THE OWNER IN
ALL POLICIES.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND FIELD CONDITIONS PRIOR TO
ANY DEMOLITION, FABRICATION, CONSTRUCTION OR INSTALLATION & NOTIFY ARCHITECT IF
CONDITIONS, MATERIALS, SIZES AND DIMENSIONS ARE DIFFERENT FROM THOSE SHOWN.
7. CROSS REFERENCE ALL DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS WITH STRUCTURAL, CIVIL, MECHANICAL,
AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS BEFORE COMMENCING ANY FABRICATION AND/OR
CONSTRUCTION.
8. CONTRACTORS SHALL INSTALL ALL MANUFACTURED ITEMS, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT IN
STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED SPECIFICATIONS, EXCEPT
WHERE THE SPECIFICATIONS HEREIN, ARE MORE STRINGENT, AND SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH.
9. MATERIALS WHICH ARE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND WHICH MAY NOT BE SPECIFICALLY
DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OR DRAWINGS, SHALL BE FURNISHED BY THE
CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE SUITABLE FOR THE INTENDED USE. MATERIALS SHALL BE IN
HARMONY WITH ADJACENT MATERIALS, AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO REVIEW FOR
CONFORMANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. WHERE INSTALLATION
TECHNIQUES ARE NOT SPECIFIED, THEY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S
CURRENT INSTRUCTION AND INDUSTRY STANDARDS.
10. SHOP DRAWINGS PREPARED BY SUPPLIERS, SUBCONTRACTORS, ETC. SHALL BE REVIEWED,
COORDINATED AND SIGNED AND STAMPED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO SUBMITTING
TO THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER.
11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE ALL NECESSARY PERMITS, LICENSES AND CERTIFICATES AND
PAY ALL FEES CONNECTED THEREWITH THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT.
12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PREPARE ALL SURFACES FOR PROPER
INSTALLATION OF FINISHES. THIS IS TO INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO: PATCHING,
SANDING, FLOOR LEVELING, PRIMING, SEALING, SKIM COATING, ETC.
13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES KEEP THE PREMISES FREE FROM WASTE MATERIAL OR
RUBBISH CAUSED BY THE WORK.
14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND AREAS
ON THE SITE OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT
TEMPORARY WALLS AND BARRIERS AS REQUIRED TO CONTAIN DUST AND DEBRIS AND TO
PROVIDE SAFE PUBLIC ACCESS AND PASSAGE.
15. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL NEW MECHANICAL UNITS OR RELOCATE ANY
EXISTING UNITS OR ITEMS THAT CONFLICT WITH NEW OR EXISTING FRAMING AND FULL
HEIGHT WALLS. THIS INCLUDES ACCESS FOR ALL CONTROLS, FILTERS, ETC. THIS WORK MUST
BE COORDINATED AND VERIFIED PRIOR TO BIDDING.
16. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND VERIFY WITH THE RESPECTIVE TRADES
THE SIZES AND LOCATIONS OF MECHANICAL AND/OR ELECTRICAL PENETRATIONS, LOCATIONS
OF FIRE TREATED BACKING/BLOCKING REQUIRED FOR MOUNTING ELECTRICAL AND/OR
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, AS WELL AS CUTTING AND PATCHING FOR WORK REQUIRED BY
MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL.
17. WHEN WORK IS COMPLETED IN AN AREA, THOROUGHLY CLEAN THE SPACES, ITEMS &
SURFACES OF SOIL, WASTE MATERIAL, SMUDGES, SPATTERS, MISAPPLIED MATERIAL, SPOTS,
STAINS, AND THE LIKE, WITHOUT DAMAGING THE MATERIALS AND SURFACES INVOLVED.
18. PROVIDE SEMI RECESSED FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE CODES AND
ORDINANCES UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
19. ALL DOORS, FRAMES, HARDWARE, LIGHTING AND CEILING MATERIALS ARE TO FOLLOW
BUILDING STANDARDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
20. PROVIDE FIRE TREATED BLOCKING IN WALLS AS REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF MILLWORK,
FURNITURE AND ACCESSORIES.
21. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY BUILDING STANDARDS WITH BUILDING MANAGER.
ALL HARDWARE SETS AND KEYING TO BE COORDINATED WITH BUILDING MANAGERS.
22. ALL INTERIOR GLASS MUST COMPLY W/ APPLICABLE CODES FOR DESIGN LOADS & SAFETY
GLAZING.
23. ALL MATERIALS USED IN PLENUM AREAS MUST BE NON-COMBUSTIBLE AND / OR LISTED FOR
PLENUM USE AS DEFINED BY THE STATE & LOCAL CODES. IT WILL BE THE CONTRACTORS
RESPONSIBILITY TO ADHERE TO THESE REQUIREMENTS.
24. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO FIRE CAULK ALL NEW AND EXISTING
PENETRATIONS WITHIN WALL PARTITIONS, ABOVE THE CEILING, AS INDICATED BY THE
APPLICABLE CODES.
25. DEFERRED SUBMITTALS: DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
TO THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD AND WILL BE REVIEWED FOR GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH
THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. SUBMITTALS FOUND TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
DESIGN INTENT WILL BE STAMPED AS REVIEWED AND FORWARDED TO THE AUTHORITY
HAVING JURISDICTION IN KEEPING WITH MN CODE SECTION 1300.013 SUBSECTION 9B.
SUBMITTALS NOT FOUND IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN INTENT WILL BE RETURNED
TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR REVISION AND RESUBMITTAL. REVISED DOCUMENTATION WILL BE
REVIEWED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE AND SUBMISSION TO THE
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION.
DEFERRED SUBMITTALS INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
A. MECHANICAL DRAWINGS (PREPARED BY DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR)
B. PLUMBING DRAWINGS (PREPARED BY DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR)
C. ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS (PREPARED BY DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR)
D. FIRE SUPPRESSION DRAWINGS (PREPARED BY DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR)
E. STRUCTURAL STEEL
F. STEEL JOIST AND DECKING
G. MISCELLANEOUS METALS STEEL STAIRS AND LANDINGS
H. COLD FORMED METAL FRAMING
FINISHES
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH AND REPAIR ANY AND ALL FLOORS, WALLS, CEILINGS, ETC. IN
A WORKMANSHIP-LIKE MANNER TO MATCH THE SURROUNDING SURFACE AREAS. SURFACES
OR MATERIALS DAMAGED BY DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED, RESTORED
AND REFINISHED TO MATCH THE EXISTING, UNLESS NOTED OR SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. IN
ADDITION THOSE EXISTING SURFACES OR MATERIALS (SERVING AS A SUBSTRATE FOR NEW
MATERIALS OR FINISHES) WHICH HAVE BEEN DAMAGED FROM ANY CAUSE, SHALL BE
REPAIRED, RESTORED, PROPERLY PREPARED AND CLEANED TO RECEIVE THE NEW MATERIALS
AND FINISH WORK. ALL NEW MATERIALS & FINISH WORK TO BE FREE FROM FLAWS &
DEFECTS.
2. PATCH AND REPAIR EXISTING FLOOR SLAB AS REQUIRED FOR A SMOOTH AND LEVEL SURFACE
FREE OF DEFECTS. FILL ALL CRACKS AND HOLES AND LEVEL DEPRESSIONS WITH MATERIALS
COMPATIBLE WITH THE FLOOR AND SLAB AS RECOMMENDED BY THE FLOORING
MANUFACTURER.
3. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING LEAD TIMES OF ALL MATERIALS
SUCH THAT MATERIALS ARE ON SITE WHEN REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION.
4. ALL PREPARATION, STORING, INSTALLATION AND CLEANUP OF FINISHES TO CONFORM TO
MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
5. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING THE CONCRETE SUBFLOOR FOR
MOISTURE PRIOR TO THE FLOORING INSTALLATION. IN ADDITION, THE GENERAL
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROVING AND VERIFYING THAT THE TESTS HAVE BEEN
PERFORMED PER ASTM STANDARDS. SHOULD THE FLOORING SUBCONTRACTOR BE ASSIGNED
TO TEST THE CONCRETE SUBFLOOR, THEY WILL NEED TO PROVIDE TO THE GENERAL
CONTRACTOR ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THESE TESTS, INCLUDING BUT
NOT LIMITED TO:
A. NUMBER OF TESTS
B. DIAGRAM OF TEST LOCATIONS
C. ACCLIMATION PERIOD BEFORE RESULTS ARE RECORDED
D. TEST RESULTS, AND THE AMBIENT CONDITIONS THE TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN
AFTER CONFIRMATION THAT THE TESTED CONDITIONS MEET BOTH THE REFERENCED AND
MANUFACTURER’S STANDARDS, THE SUBCONTRACTOR MAY PROCEED WITH THE
INSTALLATION OF THE FLOORING PER MANUFACTURER’S SPECIFICATIONS.
MECHANICAL
1. THE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGN ALL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND OBTAIN
NECESSARY PERMITS. MECHANICAL DOCUMENTS ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY THE MECHANICAL
CONTRACTOR AND SIGNED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY CODE. THE
MECHANICAL DESIGN IS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE ATTACHED ARCHITECTURAL
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. THE DESIGN IS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE TENANT PRIOR TO
IMPLEMENTATION.
2. THE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT AND CONTROLS TO COMPLETE THE JOB. THE MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO
COORDINATE W/ THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR ALL THE NECESSARY WIRING TO COMPLETE
THE JOB. THE WIRING IS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR.
3. PROVIDE WHITE SEMI RECESSED SPRINKLER HEADS W/ WHITE TRIM RING @ ALL ACT. CEILING
AND FULLY RECESSED SPRINKLER HEADS W/ WHITE ESCUTCHEON PLATES @ ALL GYP. CEILING
AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES.
4. VERIFY LOCATION AND SIZES OF ALL OPENINGS WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO
COMMENCING WORK. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO CUT & PATCH OR ADD
STRUCTURAL REINFORCING AS REQ'D FOR THE INSTALLATION OF MECHANICAL ROOFTOP
EQUIPMENT.
5. ALL SINKS SHALL HAVE HOT AND COLD WATER WITH BELOW COUNTER PIPE INSULATION
WRAP ON EXPOSED PIPING PER ADA GUIDELINES.
6. PROVIDE AND INSTALL AN APPROPRIATE SIZED WATER HEATER AS REQUIRED.
7. THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE A CLEAN-OUT PLAN FOR REVIEW AND
APPROVAL BY THE ARCHITECT BEFORE PLUMBING LINES ARE INSTALLED.
ELECTRICAL
1. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGN ALL ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS AND OBTAIN
NECESSARY PERMITS. THE ELECTRICAL DESIGN IS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE ATTACHED
ARCHITECTURAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. THE ELECTRICAL DESIGN IS TO BE REVIEWED
BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD AND TENANT PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION.
2. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF ALL MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT AND TO PROVIDE DISCONNECT AND POWER WIRING FOR ALL MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT.
3. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE EXIT AND EMERGENCY LIGHTS AS REQUIRED BY
APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES.
4. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE SMOKE DETECTION AND ALARM DEVICES AND
WIRING OF THE SPACE AS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES FOR THE
INTERIOR BUILD-OUT SPACE.
5. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL JUNCTION BOXES W/ PULL STRING FOR ALL
VOICE / DATA AND PHONE LOCATIONS. THE TENANT IS TO COORDINATE & PROVIDE ALL LOW
VOLTAGE CABLING AND COVER PLATES AS REQUIRED.
6. NEW ELECTRICAL OUTLETS ARE SHOWN AT APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. NO OUTLETS ARE TO
BE BACK TO BACK.
7. ALL UNDER CABINET LIGHTING IS TO BE CONTROLLED BY A WALL SWITCH.
8. THE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY REGARDING LOCATION, QUANTITIES,
AND TYPES OF LIGHT FIXTURES. THE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN REFERENCES LIGHT FIXTURES,
HOWEVER THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY THE FIXTURE TYPE,
APPROPRIATE FOOTCANDLES AND VOLTAGE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL SPECIFIED LIGHT
FIXTURES IN ASSOCIATION W/ THE SPECIFIC SITE CONDITIONS AND PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS
FOR REVIEW & APPROVAL PRIOR TO THE ORDERING OR INSTALLATION OF ANY FIXTURES.
INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) 2012
AMENDMENTS IN MSBC: CHAPTER 1300 2015
AMENDMENTS IN MSBC: CHAPTER 1341 2015
AMENDMENTS IN MSBC: CHAPTER 1307 2015
INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (IFC) 2012
INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL AND FUEL GAS CODE 2012
AMENDMENTS IN MSBC: CHAPTER 1346 2015
STATE BUILDING CODE (MSBC) 2015
MN PLUMBING CODE 2015
MN ENERGY CODE 2015
ASHRAE 90.1-2010 CRITERIA
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 2017
MN STATE FIRE CODE 2015
FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION: FULLY SPRINKLED
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: II-B
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B, A-3, S-1
FIRE RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION:
CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS:
EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS 0
INTERIOR BEARING WALLS 0
EXTERIOR NON-BEARING WALLS 0
STRUCTURAL FRAME 0
PARTITIONS- PERMANENT 0
SHAFT ENCLOSURES 0
FLOOR- CEILINGS/FLOORS 0
ROOFS- CEILING/ROOFS 0
EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS N.A.
SHEET INDEX
SHEET # SHEET DESCRIPTION CI
T
Y
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
-
0
8
/
1
0
/
2
0
1
8
GENERAL
A000 SHEET COVER ●
1 OF 3 SITE SURVEY ●
2 OF 3 SITE SURVEY ●
3 OF 3 SITE SURVEY ●
1 OF 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT ●
CIVIL
C1 REMOVALS & TREE PRESERVATION PLAN ●
C2 SITE & SIGNAGE PLAN ●
C3 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN ●
C4 EROSION CONTROL PLAN ●
C5 UTILITY PLAN ●
C6 SANITARY SEWER PLAN & PROFILE ●
C7 DETAILS ●
C8 DETAILS ●
C9 DETAILS ●
LANDSCAPE
L1.1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN ●
L1.2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS AND NOTES ●
ARCHITECTURAL
A200 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ●
A201-A FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - OFFICE AREA ●
A201-B FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - TRAINING AREA ●
A202 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - OFFICE AREA ●
A300 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATIONS ●
A330 3D VIEWS ●
ELECTRICAL
E101 SITE ELECTRIC PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ●
ZONING DISTRICT: B - BUSINESS
PERMITTED USE: OFFICE/WAREHOUSE
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 3 ACRES (2 ACRES WITH SHARED INFRASTRUCTURE)
PROVIDED LOT SIZE: 15.97 ACRES
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 175'
PROVIDED LOT WIDTH: 631'
MINIMUM LOT DEPTH: 175'
PROVIDED LOT DEPTH: 1,288'
SETBACKS (BUILDING)
FRONT SETBACK: 40'
SIDE SETBACK: 25' OR 15' WITH INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT
REAR SETBACK: 25' OR 15' WITH INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT
TO RESIDENTIAL: 100' (OR 75' WITH 70% BUFFER)
SETBACKS (PARKING)
FRONT: 25'
SIDE: 15'
REAR: 15'
TO RESIDENTIAL: 100' (OR 60' WITH 70% BUFFER)
MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS:70% (80% IF INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT)
MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 30'; 35' IF SPRINKLED; 45' WITH FIRE MARSHALL APPROVAL
ESTIMATED WATER USAGE: 7,500 GALLONS PER DAY
ESTIMATED SANITARY USAGE: 6,800 GALLONS PER DAY
BUILDING AREA:
LOWER LEVEL: 22,818 GSF
FIRST FLOOR: 59,931 GSF
SECOND FLOOR: 40,705 GSF
TOTAL: 123,454 GSF
STALL SIZE: 9' X 19'
AISLE WIDTH: 22' MINIMUM
PARKING REQUIREMENT:
OFFICE: 1/250 SF
WAREHOUSE: 1/2000 SF PLUS ONE PER EMPLOYEE ON LARGEST SHIFT
ASSEMBLY: 1/4 SEATS
PARKING CALCULATION:
OFFICE: 91,357 GSF / 250 = 365 STALLS REQUIRED
WAREHOUSE: 22,818 GSF / 2000 = 12 STALLS REQUIRED (EMPLOYEES ARE COUNTED IN OFFICE)
ASSEMBLY: 800 SEATS / 4 SEATS PER STALL = 200 STALLS
NOTE: ASSEMBLY SPACES ARE USED BY THE SAME EMPLOYEES COUNTED IN THE OFFICE
CALCULATION ABOVE OR BY OCCUPANTS ALREADY IN BUILDING ONE, SO THERE IS NO
ADDITIONAL PARKING LOAD FOR THE PROJECT.
REQ'D STALLS: 377
PROVIDED: 334
PARKING NEED ON DAY ONE WILL BE 250. OVER 5 YEARS CENSUS IN BUILDING 2 WILL INCREASE
TO 400. INTENT IS TO EXPAND PARKING TO THE NORTH AS NEEDED TO HANDLE DEMAND AS THE
COMPANY GROWS. A PROOF OF PARKING PLAN CAN BE DEVELOPED IF NEEDED.
REGARDING OFFICE SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS, NOTE THAT THE 91,357 GROSS SQUARE
FEET LISTED ABOVE INCLUDES ALL OF THE CONFERENCE AREAS WITHIN THE OFFICE
ENVIRONMENT. THESE SPACES WOULD BE OCCUPIED BY THE SAME PEOPLE ON THE OFFICE
FLOOR, SO THE CALCULATION FOR OFFICE PARKING IS ARTIFICIALLY INFLATED.
X
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
SMN
AMT
AUGUST 10, 2018
3701.13
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
Open Systems
International,
Building #2
New Construction
Project Building Name
Arrowhead Road
Medina, MN 55340
NO
T
F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
REGISTRATION NUMBER:51317REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
ADAM M. THIELE, PE
REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors
3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303
763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
C2
SITE & SIGNAGE
PLAN
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
X
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
SMN
AMT
AUGUST 10, 2018
3701.13
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
Open Systems
International,
Building #2
New Construction
Project Building Name
Arrowhead Road
Medina, MN 55340
NO
T
F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
REGISTRATION NUMBER:51317REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
ADAM M. THIELE, PE
REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors
3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303
763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
C1
REMOVALS & TREE
PRESERVATION PLAN
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
X
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
SMN
AMT
AUGUST 10, 2018
3701.13
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
Open Systems
International,
Building #2
New Construction
Project Building Name
Arrowhead Road
Medina, MN 55340
NO
T
F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
REGISTRATION NUMBER:51317REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
ADAM M. THIELE, PE
REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors
3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303
763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
C3
GRADING & DRAINAGE
PLAN
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
X
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
SMN
AMT
AUGUST 10, 2018
3701.13
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
Open Systems
International,
Building #2
New Construction
Project Building Name
Arrowhead Road
Medina, MN 55340
NO
T
F
O
R
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
REGISTRATION NUMBER:51317REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
ADAM M. THIELE, PE
REGISTRATION NUMBER:REGISTRATION NUMBER:
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors
3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303
763-427-5860 FAX 763-427-0520
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under
the laws of the State of Minnesota.
C5
UTILITY PLAN
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
UP
A
B
C
UP
A3001
A300 3
A B C D E F G H
1
2
3
4
5
6
2272 SF
FITNESS AREA
162
1154 SF
IT VAULT
163
750 SF
MECHANICAL / ELECTRICAL
164
N
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
NO
T
FOR
CONSTRU
CTION
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
7
4
2
8
_
O
p
e
n
_
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
_
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
-
2
_
n
m
i
ss
l
i
n
g
.
r
v
t
A200
LOWER LEVEL
FLOOR PLAN
S. OLIVER
N. MISSLING
08/10/2018
17428.0OSI
K:/JOBS/OPEN SYSTEMS
CITY SUBMITTAL
OPEN SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL,
BUILDING #2
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
3/32" = 1'-0"A200
1 LOWER LEVEL - WAREHOUSE
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/2018
UP
UP
DN
UP
A
B
C
GENERAL PROJECT NOTES
1. OWNER FURNISHED EQUIPMENT SUPPLIERS ARE TO COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION OF
EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION WITH THE OWNER.
2. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR & CABLE CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY
DAMAGE CAUSED TO WALLS, FINISHES, CEILINGS ETC. IN THE COURSE OF THEIR
CONSTRUCTION. IF CONTRACTORS BEGIN WORK IN AN AREA WITH EXISTING DAMAGE THEY
ARE TO IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
3. SHADING INDICATES AREA THAT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF WORK.
282' - 0"
13
4
'
-
0
"
A B C D E F G H
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
244 SF
MEDIUM
CONFERENCE
1
405 SF
LARGE
CONFERENCE
2 476 SF
LARGE
CONFERENCE
3 244 SF
MEDIUM
CONFERENCE
4
1872 SF
BREAK ROOM
7
10406 SF
STAGING
8
278 SF
CATERING KITCHEN
9
89 SF
JANITOR
10
104 SF
STORAGE
12
100 SF
PRIVATE
16
115 SF
OFFICE
19
115 SF
OFFICE
20
115 SF
OFFICE
21
115 SF
OFFICE
22
115 SF
OFFICE
23
115 SF
OFFICE
24
198 SF
EXEC OFFICE
25
112 SF
ENCLAVE
26
112 SF
OFFICE
28
112 SF
OFFICE
29
234 SF
EXEC OFFICE
30
112 SF
OFFICE
31
112 SF
OFFICE
32
112 SF
OFFICE
33
112 SF
OFFICE
34
206 SF
EXEC OFFICE
35 112 SF
ENCLAVE
36
112 SF
ENCLAVE
37
112 SF
ENCLAVE
38
207 SF
EXEC OFFICE
39
112 SF
OFFICE
40
112 SF
OFFICE
41
196 SF
EXEC OFFICE
42
117 SF
OFFICE
43
117 SF
OFFICE
44
117 SF
OFFICE
45
117 SF
OFFICE
46
117 SF
ENCLAVE
47
116 SF
OFFICE
51
116 SF
OFFICE
52
116 SF
OFFICE
53
116 SF
OFFICE
54
116 SF
OFFICE
55
77 SF
PRIVATE
RESTROOM
59
77 SF
PRIVATE
RESTROOM
60
C.4 C.8 D.8 E.8 F.3
73 SF
SERVICE
ELEVATOR
63
99 SF
COATS
64
392 SF
WOMEN'S RESTROOM
72
144 SF
IT SERVER
73
307 SF
IT MECHANICAL
74
229 SF
WORK ROOM
75
56 SF
STORAGE
77
172 SF
SMALL
CONFERENCE
78
47 SF
COATS
80
50 SF
ELEV
79
220 SF
MEDIUM
CONFERENCE
149
87 SF
PRIVATE
151
130 SF
ELEC /
COMMS.
152
220 SF
MEDIUM
CONFERENCE
153
116 SF
OFFICE
157
116 SF
OFFICE
158
115 SF
OFFICE
159107 SF
STORAGE
160
364 SF
KITCHENETTE
161
116 SF
OFFICE
169
116 SF
OFFICE
170
116 SF
OFFICE
171
116 SF
OFFICE
172
116 SF
OFFICE
173
24
'
-
9
5
/
8
"
5' - 0" 15' - 0" 5' - 0" 15' - 0" 10' - 0" 15' - 0"6' - 2 3/8"
71' - 2 3/8"
9'
-
0
"
1
5
'
-
0
"
7
'
-
0
"
2
4
'
-
0
"
9
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
4
'
-
0
"
1'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
0
"
5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0"
1' - 0"
4' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0"
1' - 0"
4' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0"
1' - 0"
4' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" 7' - 8" 3' - 4" 20' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0" 40' - 0"40' - 0"
1' - 0"
112 SF
OFFICE
199
BUILDING USE
WAREHOUSE - LOWER LEVEL
FITNESS AREA - LOWER LEVEL
TOTAL
TYPE SQ.
FEET
OCC.
FACTOR
OCC.
LOAD
2 EXITS
REQUIRED
S-1 19,850 USF 500 40
A-3 50 46 N
2,296
Y
CODE REVIEW
1. COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL IS LESS THAN 0'-0" LONG
NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGES FOR BUILDING PERMIT ONLY, NOT FOR LEASING
2,272 USF
SUBTOTAL - LOWER LEVEL - - 86 -22,122 USF
TRAINING AREA - FIRST LEVEL A-3 7 1,326 Y9,279 USF
OFFICE AREA - FIRST LEVEL B 100 493 Y49,273 USF
SUBTOTAL - FIRST LEVEL - - 1,819 -58,552 USF
OFFICE AREA - SECOND LEVEL B 100 391 Y39,040 USF
119,714 USF
N
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
NO
T
FOR
CONSTRU
CTION
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
7
4
2
8
_
O
p
e
n
_
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
_
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
-
2
_
n
m
i
ss
l
i
n
g
.
r
v
t
A201-A
FIRST LEVEL FLOOR
PLAN - OFFICE
AREA
S. OLIVER
N. MISSLING
08/10/2018
17428.0OSI
K:/JOBS/OPEN SYSTEMS
CITY SUBMITTAL
OPEN SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL,
BUILDING #2
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES
TAG KEYNOTE
1 -
2 -
3/32" = 1'-0"A201-A
1 1ST LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN - OFFICE AREA
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/2018
UP
DNDNDN
DNDN
A B C D E F G H
7
8
9
10
11
12
C.4 C.8 D.8 E.8 F.3
184 SF
STORAGE
61
228 SF
STORAGE
62
1'
-
0
"
10
'
-
6
"
8
'
-
6
"
3
1
'
-
1
0
"
40
'
-
0
"
38
'
-
2
"
2'
-
2
"
13
'
-
1
0
"
1' - 0"
15' - 0"
4' - 0"
36' - 0"40' - 0"
4' - 0"
19' - 0"
1' - 0"
1559 SF
TRAINING
65
1558 SF
TRAINING
66
1540 SF
TRAINING
67
1541 SF
TRAINING
68
1541 SF
TRAINING
69
1540 SF
TRAINING
70
392 SF
MEN'S RESTROOM
71 392 SF
WOMEN'S RESTROOM
72
130 SF
OFFICE
73
130 SF
OFFICE
74
130 SF
OFFICE
75
130 SF
OFFICE
77
130 SF
OFFICE
78
130 SF
OFFICE
79
120' - 0"
14
6
'
-
0
"
122 SF
VENDING
180
24' - 9 5/8"
N
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
NO
T
FOR
CONSTRU
CTION
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
7
4
2
8
_
O
p
e
n
_
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
_
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
-
2
_
n
m
i
ss
l
i
n
g
.
r
v
t
A201-B
FIRST LEVEL FLOOR
PLAN - TRAINING
AREA
S. OLIVER
N. MISSLING
08/10/2018
17428.0OSI
K:/JOBS/OPEN SYSTEMS
CITY SUBMITTAL
OPEN SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL,
BUILDING #2
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
3/32" = 1'-0"A201-B
1 1ST LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN - TRAINING WING
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/2018
DN
DN
A
B
C
A B C D E F G H
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
17' - 8" x 28' - 8"
LARGE
CONFERENCE
17
17' - 8" x 28' - 8"
LARGE
CONFERENCE
18
14' - 0" x 17' - 8"
MEDIUM
CONFERENCE
23
11' - 9" x 15' - 4"
LAB
24
11' - 9" x 15' - 4"
LAB
25
588 SF
LARGE
CONFERENCE
26
583 SF
LARGE
CONFERENCE
27
920 SF
EXECUTIVE
CONFERENCE
28
104 SF
WORK ROOM
56
C.4 C.8 D.8 E.8 F.3
120 SF
OFFICE
81
120 SF
OFFICE
82
120 SF
OFFICE
83
120 SF
OFFICE
84
120 SF
OFFICE
85
120 SF
OFFICE
86
200 SF
EXEC OFFICE
87
112 SF
OFFICE
88
112 SF
OFFICE
89
112 SF
ENCLAVE
90
112 SF
ENCLAVE
91
231 SF
EXEC OFFICE
92
112 SF
OFFICE
93
112 SF
OFFICE
94
112 SF
ENCLAVE
95
112 SF
ENCLAVE
96
112 SF
ENCLAVE
97
112 SF
OFFICE
98
112 SF
OFFICE
99
211 SF
EXEC OFFICE
100
112 SF
OFFICE
101
112 SF
OFFICE
102
112 SF
OFFICE
103
112 SF
OFFICE
104
170 SF
EXEC OFFICE
105
112 SF
OFFICE
106
112 SF
OFFICE
107
112 SF
OFFICE
108
112 SF
OFFICE
109
112 SF
OFFICE
110
112 SF
OFFICE
111
237 SF
EXEC OFFICE
112
113 SF
ENCLAVE
114
113 SF
ENCLAVE
115
113 SF
ENCLAVE
116
113 SF
OFFICE
117
113 SF
OFFICE
118
113 SF
OFFICE
119
113 SF
OFFICE
120
124 SF
ENCLAVE
121
124 SF
ENCLAVE
122119 SF
OFFICE
123
120 SF
OFFICE
124
120 SF
OFFICE
125
119 SF
OFFICE
126
116 SF
OFFICE
127
116 SF
OFFICE
128
116 SF
OFFICE
129
116 SF
OFFICE
130
116 SF
OFFICE
131
184 SF
SM CONFERENCE
132
184 SF
SM CONFERENCE
133
184 SF
SM CONFERENCE
134
184 SF
SM CONFERENCE
135
73 SF
SERVICE
ELEVATOR
136
433 SF
KITCHENETTE
137
79 SF
PRIVATE
RESTROOM
139
79 SF
PRIVATE
RESTROOM
140
96 SF
PRIVATE
141
223 SF
WOMEN'S
RESTROOM
142
110 SF
ELECTRICAL /
COMMUNICATIONS
144
50 SF
ELEV.
147
236 SF
MEDIUM
CONFERENCE
165
405 SF
LARGE
CONFERENCE
166 488 SF
LARGE
CONFERENCE
167 244 SF
MEDIUM
CONFERENCE
168
116 SF
OFFICE
174
116 SF
OFFICE
175
116 SF
OFFICE
176
116 SF
OFFICE
177
116 SF
OFFICE
178
78 SF
PRIVATE
179
117 SF
STORAGE
192
57 SF
JANITOR
193
319 SF
MEN'S RESTROOM
194
121 SF
PRIVATE
195
211 SF
SMALL CONFERENCE
196
236 SF
MEDIUM CONFERENCE
197
213 SF
EXEC OFFICE
198
N
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
NO
T
FOR
CONSTRU
CTION
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
7
4
2
8
_
O
p
e
n
_
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
_
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
-
2
_
n
m
i
ss
l
i
n
g
.
r
v
t
A202
SECOND LEVEL
FLOOR PLAN -
OFFICE AREA
S. OLIVER
N. MISSLING
08/10/2018
17428.0OSI
K:/JOBS/OPEN SYSTEMS
CITY SUBMITTAL
OPEN SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL,
BUILDING #2
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
3/32" = 1'-0"A202
1 2ND LEVEL - FLOOR PLAN - OFFICE AREA
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/2018
BRK-1 BRICK TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDING
EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND
PC-2 PRECAST CONCRETE WITH LIGHT SANDBLAST FINISH
COLOR: WHITE
MTL-1 CENTRIA IW-30A METAL WALL PANELS
COLOR: SILVER METALLIC
MTL-3 PREFINISHED METAL TRIM
COLOR: SILVER METALLIC
PC-1 PRECAST CONCRETE WITH ACID ETCH FINISH
COLOR: GRAY
MTL-2 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM COMPOSITE PANELS
COLOR: SILVER METALLIC
MATERIAL AREA (SQ FT) PERCENTAGE ALLOWED
GLASS 12,567 26.4%
> 20%
BRICK 17,054 35.8%
CONCRETE 14,700 30.8% < 80%
METAL 2,980 6.3% < 20%
OTHER 345 0.7% N/A
TOTAL 47,646 100%
EXTERIOR MATERIALS PERCENTAGE
1ST LEVEL
100' - 0"
Roof
133' - 4"
2ND LEVEL
116' - 0"
T.O. PARAPET
138' - 0"
123456789101112
LOWER LEVEL
86' - 0"
BRK-1
PC-1
MTL-2
MTL-3
MTL-2 MTL-3
BRK-1
PC-1
PC-2
PC-2 MTL-1
MTL-2
1ST LEVEL
100' - 0"
Roof
133' - 4"
2ND LEVEL
116' - 0"
T.O. PARAPET
138' - 0"
ABCDEFGH
LOWER LEVEL
86' - 0"
MTL-1
BRK-1
PC-1
PC-2
BRK-1
PC-1
PC-2
MTL-2
MTL-1
MTL-3
MTL-2MTL-3
MTL-2
1ST LEVEL
100' - 0"
Roof
133' - 4"
2ND LEVEL
116' - 0"
T.O. PARAPET
138' - 0"
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
LOWER LEVEL
86' - 0"
PC-1
BRK-1
PC-2
PC-2
MTL-1
MTL-2
MTL-3
MTL-1
MTL-2
PC-1
BRK-1
MTL-2
MTL-3
1ST LEVEL
100' - 0"
Roof
133' - 4"
2ND LEVEL
116' - 0"
T.O. PARAPET
138' - 0"
A B C D E F G H
LOWER LEVEL
86' - 0"
C.4 C.8 D.8 E.8 F.3
PC-1
BRK-1
PC-2
MTL-1
BRK-3 MTL-2
PC-2
MTL-3
PC-1
BRK-1
MTL-2
PC-2
BRK-1
PC-1
MTL-2 MTL-3
MTL-2
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
NO
T
FOR
CONSTRU
CTION
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
7
4
2
8
_
O
p
e
n
_
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
_
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
-
2
_
n
m
i
ss
l
i
n
g
.
r
v
t
A300
EXTERIOR
BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
S. OLIVER
N. MISSLING
08/10/2018
17428.0OSI
K:/JOBS/OPEN SYSTEMS
CITY SUBMITTAL
OPEN SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL,
BUILDING #2
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
3/32" = 1'-0"A300
1 EAST ELEVATION
3/32" = 1'-0"A300
2 NORTH ELEVATION
3/32" = 1'-0"A300
3 WEST ELEVATION
3/32" = 1'-0"A300
4 SOUTH ELEVATION
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
CITY SUBMITTAL 08/10/2018
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
NO
T
FOR
CONSTRU
CTION
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND
OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW,
STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING
COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
1
7
4
2
8
_
O
p
e
n
_
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
_
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
-
2
_
n
m
i
ss
l
i
n
g
.
r
v
t
A330
3D VIEWS
Checker
Author
08/10/2018
17428.0OSI
K:/JOBS/OPEN SYSTEMS
CITY SUBMITTAL
OPEN SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL,
BUILDING #2
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ARROWHEAD DRIVE
MEDINA, MN 55340
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
C:\Users\nmissling\Desktop\Revit Exports to Share\MH_30x42-OSII-MH-Logo-BW-Print-1327047.jpg
N
HIGHWAY 55
")55
")24
")19
")101
")116
")11
")24
")19
£¤12
HAMEL RD
MEDINA RD
PIONEER TRL
TAMARACK DR
WILLOW DR
HACKAMORE RD
ARROWHEAD DR
HOMESTEAD TRL
CHIPPEWA RD
HUNTER DR
PARKVIEW DR
BROCKTON LN N
MEANDER RD
EVERGREEN RD
BROCKTON LN N
CHIPPEWA RD
WILLOW DR
WILLOW DR
HUNTER DR
")55
Medina Golf &
Country Club
YMCA -
Camp Ihduhapi
Spring Hill
Golf Club
Baker Park Reserve
Baker Park Reserve
Wolsfeld Woods (SNA)
Lake Independence Regional Trail
North-South 1 Regional Trail Search Corridor
Lake Sarah Regional Trail Search Corridor
Lake Sarah Regional Trail Search Corridor
Resubmitted for Metropolitan Council ReviewMap Date: January 5, 2018
Scale: 1:32,000[0 0.5 10.25 Mile
Map 6-1Park and Trail Plan
Location of proposed trail segmentsare intended to identify connectionsand cooridors, not exact locations.
Legend
Trails
Existing Paved Trail
Existing Shoulder Trail
Existing Turf Trail
Existing Sidewalk
Proposed Paved Trail
Proposed Shoulder Trail
Proposed Turf Trail
Future Park Search Area
Parks
Existing Park
Potential Park Expansion
Regional Corridors
Regional Trail Search Corridor
Open Systems International (OSI)
Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan Review
Park Commission – September 19, 2018
Summary
•125,500 square foot building on new lot
•95,500 s.f. office
•20,000 s.f. warehouse
•10,000 s.f. training
•Application includes following requests:
•Rezoning – Lot 1 from Mixed Use to Business
•Preliminary Plat – subdivide existing outlot into a lot and a smaller outlot
•Site Plan Review
•Plat and Site Plan Review being adjusted to address comments
•Planning Commission recommended approval of rezoning to B district (3‐1)
•City Council unanimously directed staff to prepare rezoning to B
Preliminary Plat
•Following adjustments, Lot 1 will be larger and Outlot A smaller
•Transportation
•Additional right‐of‐way for Arrowhead and Chippewa
•Petition and Waiver for future turn lanes
Park Dedication
•Options
•10% of buildable property (1.96 acres)
•8% cash‐in‐lieu ($170,960)
•Combination of above
•Park plan touches western edge of property – intent is for park to west
•Trail plan – corridor along future Chippewa Road (north edge of Outlot)
•10‐foot trail easement on northern boundary – 0.11 acres (5.6% of
required land)
•94.4% of cash = $161,386.24
City of Medina Parks/Trails Donation Program
____ Park/Trails Donation Program
Amended ______
___ Parks/Trails Donation Program DRAFT
Purpose:
The City of Medina welcomes and invites donations from any individual, corporation,
organization or service group to be made toward park and trail improvements. Donating
an item is a personal and generous way to honor a loved one and contribute a lasting gift
to the community. Such donations are for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future
residents.
Policy Statement:
From time to time the City is approached by residents or groups with proposals for
improvements to City parks and trails, often at no expense to the City. The City first
ensures that proposed projects fit into long term plans for the City and that the ongoing
cost of project maintenance will be manageable. Such proposals may include benches,
picnic tables, bike racks, trees, or other park improvements as noted below in the
Approved Donation List.
Procedure:
Community groups or individuals are invited to summarize their donation on a Parks
Donation Application Form provided by the City. Once the project has been approved by
the City, the Public Works Director will proceed with the installation and advise the
donor of the location of the item, if requested.
Approved Donation List
• 6’ or 8’ benches $1,000- 1,100
The 6 foot and 8 foot benches are made of recycled plastic planks attached to
bronze powder coat metal frames and mounted in a concrete base.
• 6’ or 8’ picnic tables $1,000- 1,100
The 6 foot and 8 foot tables are made of recycled plastic planks attached to bronze
powder coat metal frames and mounted in a concrete base.
• Tree Planting $400 average, price varies
Staff will provide a number of tree species to choose from depending upon the
location chosen by the City. Locations to include City parks, trails, or other City
property.
• Bike Rack $1,000
Bike racks are non-rust galvanized of the wave type. 4 bike minimum.
• Other $ varies
Details to be provided to the City for review and approval.
Commemorative Plaques: The 2.5”x 10” cast-bronze plaques are flush mounted into the
bench or table, or attached to other donations as appropriate.
City of Medina Parks/Trails Donation Program
____ Park/Trails Donation Program
Amended ______
All installations completed by City staff.
Prices subject to change.
Your contribution may be tax deductible. See your tax advisor.
Thank you for your interest in our City Parks and Trails.
Program Approval: City Council approved on __________; City Council amended on
__________
Draft
Parks Donation Application Form
Donor’s Name _____________________________
Address _____________________________
_____________________________
Phone Number _____________________________
Email _____________________________
Item to be donated: ________________________________________________
Donated amount: _________________________________________________
Details of item/project, if not on Approved Donation List, and funding source*.
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
*If item not on Approved Donation List, it will require City review and approval.
If donation is being made as a gift to another person, then please provide below the
name and address of the person who will receive a Letter of Appreciation from the
City.
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
Plaque Statement: (maximum _____ characters, and three lines)
Provide exact wording for your plaque in the space below.
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Signature: ____________________________ Date: ____________________
Make checks out to the City of Medina. Mail your check and this application to: City of Medina
Parks Donation Program, 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN 55340
For more information, please contact City Hall at 763-473-4643.
1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Medina Park Commission
FROM: Jodi Gallup, Assistant City Administrator
DATE OF REPORT: September 14, 2018
DATE OF MEETING: September 19, 2018
SUBJECT: Park Commission Meeting Report
2. Additions to Agenda
If any Park Commissioner wishes to add an item to the agenda after the agenda has
already been posted, the agenda item must be proposed at this point in the meeting. The
Park Commission must agree to add the item by motion.
No attachments for this item.
5. City Council Update
This is a reoccurring agenda item to have City Council Liaison to the Park Commission
John Anderson give an update at each meeting on what is happening at the Council level.
No attachments for this item.
6. Three Rivers Park District – Baker Park Reserve Master Plan
Gabrielle Grinde, a planning consultant representing Three Rivers Park District, will be at
the Park Commission meeting to solicit input from the Park Commissioners on Baker
Park Reserve’s Master Plan. Please review the attached handout and come prepared to
answer the discussion questions.
See attachments.
Recommended Action: Provide feedback to Three Rivers Park District
7. OSI – Park Dedication Review
Open Systems International, Inc. (OSI) has requested approval of various land use
applications to allow for construction of a second building on a separate lot north of their
existing facility at 4101 Arrowhead Drive. Planning Director Dusty Finke’s report
provides details on the application. The Park Dedication review can be found on pages 4
& 5 of the report.
See attachments.
Recommended Action: Make recommendation to City Council on Park Dedication
8. Park Donation Program
Park Commissioner Ann Thies has updated the attached Park Donation Program
information based on feedback from the July 18th meeting.
See attachments.
Recommended Action: Make recommendation on Park Donation Program
7. Staff Report
a. 2018 Park Commission Goals – This is a reoccurring item to continually review our goals
and provide updates on progress made.
2
b. General Items. This agenda item is to give a verbal update on any other general park
items.
Staff representation at the September 19th Park Commission meeting will be Assistant City
Administrator Jodi Gallup and Public Works Director Steve Scherer.
2018 Park Commission Goals
1. List of annual items
i) January – Annual Goal Setting Session
ii) April – Participate in Annual City Clean-up Day (discuss in March)
iii) May – Annual Park Tour – May 16th at 5 p.m.
iv) June/July – Capital Improvement Plan Review (review in June)
v) September – Participate in Annual Celebration Day (discuss in August)
vi) Review applicable grants as they become available.
2. Park & Trail Master Plan
This plan was approved in March 2014, but should be reviewed annually for changes.
Please continue to bring this plan with to all future meetings to reference. A subset of this
item will be to:
- Review the trail plan to look at trail connections, topography, and safety.
- Update trail map and priorities to align with 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
- Review the trail maintenance plan and the life of each trail.
- Address off-set shoulder trails such as Medina Road and Hamel Road.
- Continue to work towards making a multi-use trail connection to Baker Park
Reserve from the east.
- Master Plan Subcommittee: Rumsey and Jacob
3. Review Park Dedication Revenues versus planned Park Improvements
Review Park Dedication revenues versus planned park improvements to make sure the
city is being good stewards of the limited funds set aside for future park improvements.
- Study the park dedication ordinance and evaluate if the calculation needs to be
updated.
- Look at other revenue sources such as grants, donations, or the City’s general
fund.
- Conduct a thorough review and overhaul of existing Park/Trail Capital
Improvement Plan.
- Update 2019-2023 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) at June and July meetings
after Spring Park Tour.
- Subcommittee: Lee and Weir
4. Create a Parks/Trails Donation Program
The City has a park bench donation program, but there is no formal written policy. The
Park Commission would like to create a more formal donation program policy to cover
all types of donations to the parks and trails such as land, easements, money, trees,
benches, playground equipment, etc. This policy could also address naming rights for
significant contributions or memorial plaques for smaller gifts.
- Subcommittee: Thies
5. Review Funding Policy for Ballfield Improvements
In 2010, the Park Commission established a funding policy for ball field lighting and
irrigation projects within our parks. The policy indicated that the City would pay a 25%
cost-share to help fund the construction of ball field lights and irrigation systems. This
policy needs to be evaluated to determine if 25% is the correct amount for a cost-share.
- Subcommittee: Weir and Lee
- Completed: Park Commission recommended changes on February 21, 2018.
City Council adopted changes on March 6, 2018.
6. Youth Park Commissioner Projects
This item is to allow the Youth Park Commissioners to come up with a specific project to
benefit our parks so they can be showcased in a future city newsletter and/or publication.
Kingsley: Little Free Library
Lubenow: Art/Photography at City Hall
2018 Planned Park & Trail Improvements
CSAH 115 Trail – between Tower Drive and Hamel Road
Hamel Legion Park
New Lights on Little League Field
New Dugouts on Little League Field
Maple Park
Install new pavilion
Pave parking lot
Fields of Medina Park
Second basketball hoop
Lakeshore Park
Look into placement of bench by water
Park Commissioner Park Assignments
o Weir: Holy Name Park & City Hall
o Jacob: Rainwater Nature Area
o Morrison: Lakeshore Park & Walnut Park
o Rumsey: Hunter Lions Park
o Thies: Tomann Preserve
o Lee: Hamel Legion Park and Maple Park
o Kingsley: Medina Morningside Park & The Park at Fields of Medina
o Lubenow: Medina Lake Preserve