HomeMy Public PortalAboutMassport-PowerPoint to CAC_June 2018 Update to MCAC General Meeting
1 ►mi
Agenda
• Massport Context
• Massport Airports
• Worcester Regional and Hanscom Field
• Boston Logan Overview and Update
Massachusetts Port Authority
Independent• - Authority
• Corporate Structure
• Self Sustaining Finances (no state/local tax
•
i
Portfolio: Air• • • - and Cruise :'\ Properties y `
a
Port, - Properties and Real Estate
East Boston
Waterfront
South Boston
—��- Boston `` � - ' � Properties
Airp ,
Vic, P
Massport Owns and Operates Three Airports, Each with a
Unique Role within the Regional and National Airport Systems
Logan International • .
Worcester Regional Airport
Hanscom Field
New England's Leading Commercial
Service Airport and International
Gateway A Multi-Use Corporatel General
Aviation and Commercial Service
Airport
A Full-Service General Aviation
�\7
Airport
I Corporate
for LoganAirport
Regional Transportation Status
• Regional Aviation System continues
to serve New England
• Total regional air passengers increased from iaTv �"'•
48.81VI in 2015 to 51.9 in 2016
• Passengers at regional airports:
— Bradley Int'I — 6.06 million passengers in 2016 j Pwx
T.F. Green —3.65 million passengers in 2016 f'�^A�M
5 • ,,km.Aq
— Manchester-Boston — 2.02 million passengers . SMHAvo^n
in 2016 '" • • ^^^^
—NOMeut Cawb
— Worcester—over 500,000 JetBlue passengers A.,.k S.
to date
D rvm^n corks
BOS Logo V•mazmnal
Boy PVD T.F.crew
• Acela ridership (BOS-DC) has increased three MHT
fold since inception from 1 million in 2001 to i BTV 9wugma miemawa
I PVD PWM PorOw Wtl naW Ap^n
3.5 million in 2016 PSM Po v ^mine a
BED Hwuran FM
HV ORH Wm awfs*oM
HVN T•eed New Haven Re4^nv
• In 2016, NEC ridership reached a new record, BGR Uvrl mnwiomIMIIL
surpassing 2015 record levels. Amtrak carried
more riders between New York City and
Boston than all airlines combined
Worcester Regional Airport
Massport investments in ORH totals
approximately $ 150 Million
• Massport assumed ownership
of Worcester Regional Airport
d meican`, on July 1 , 2010 as part of the
Transportation Reform Act,
Acquisition costs $ 17 M
Cumulative Annual Operating Deficits $ 70 M
CAT III Landing System $ 22 M
New Taxiway $ 10 M
Runway Resurfacing $ 4.5 M
ARFF Building Renovation $ 5.5 M
ARFF Emergency Vehicles $ 1 .2 M
z- p ,, a - Snow Removal Equipment $ 3.4 M
Rectrix New FBO $ 7.8 M
Successful Establishment of Commercial Service,
(JetBlue and American )
Worcester has served a cumulative total of over 500,000 passengers since 2013
> 500,000
367,473
M0,000
250,846
200,000
131,691
100,000
14,980
2013 2014 2015 2016 2018
■ ORH Cumulative Passengers
y 'y
-
y
,tom
»m
p
w
Hanscom Field
Hanscom Field plays a crucial role in the
strength of the local economy
• $348 million in annual economic
impact (2014) o
• 1,745 full-time equivalent jobs related
to Hanscom Airfield activity (2014)
• Close proximity to Route 128 ( 1-95)
Massachusetts' Tech Highway
• Two runways - RW 5/23 and RWF
11/29, which are 5, 107 and 7,011 feet
in length
• Three Fixed Base Operators
Source: Annual State of Hanscom Report, Massport, 2016
Logan Airport Update
Logan, Boston Region's Economic Engine
• Logan generates $13
Billion in annual ECONOMIC •
economic impact TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT
$15.1 BILLION
• Economic impact of new,
0.3%nonstop international 2.3% , Boston Logan Inc'I(BOS) $13.4 billion
• Laurence G.Haruom Field
Air Force 3ase $13 billion
flights total $1.4 billion Laurence G.Hanscom Field(BED)
Civilian Aitpo:t Facild es 9348.9 million
annually • Worcester Regional A rport(ORH) $46.4million
17,000 direct jobs and note MaspM nvm[er:aM percxra5es are rounde].
•
over 100,000 indirect jobs
Key factors that under-pin air passenger
demand at Boston Logan
1 . The Boston Metro Area is a large, high income
market area with low unemployment
2. The Boston Metro Area has a well-diversified, travel
intensive economic base
3 . 95% of Logan passengers are origin-destination
(O& D) passengers
4. Logan is served by a well-diversified mix of airlines
Boston's per capita personal income is the 3rd
highest in the U .S.
Large and Stable Population : High Income:
• The Boston Metro Area is the
• Boston"s per capita personal
101" largest by population — income is the 3rd highest
5.7 million in the U.S.
. . 10 Metropolitan
• Accounts for approximately 80
70
84% of Massachusetts' total E0
50
population. 40
30 .. . .
20
10
0
00 RP
i°c °c o3� o10
Fs0c64
�0c) woe 05r`c0 �0 ���"c� r\0a0�Q 50a \ccOaQ o�Pc90
yao e
Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Labor Statistics
'As of December 2016
Logan serves an economically vibrant service area
Top" 10 MetropolitanFarm Employees
Strong Employment Base:
m 10
c
8 9t" largest employment base in
6 the U.S.
4
2 ' ® � ® Low Unemployment':
0
rya c�a `oc ate`
a� �cA Gr�cP �`JJo er\c� °Je a60 P.�a woe �.
Lowest unemployment rate
� aOa
O
. , 10 Metropolitan . • among top 10 Metro Areas
6%
5% Consistently below national
4% '
3 average at 3.4% compared to
4.5% for the U.S.
etioc . 0`°c t°� a�ae °fir oaf �Qo`a ac�a a� oee
0° aec`c �a� ePcA �� G,C• \aae Q� �` �°
a`
O
Sources: U.S. Department of commerce, Bureau of Labor Statistics
'As of March 2017
Boston Logan Statistics ( 2017 )
How Boston's Airport Bounced Back
• Total Passengers : From the Storm That Crippled J.F.K.
38.4M - --
61
• Int' I Passengers : 7 . 2M �°
n; 4
a
• Cargo : 680 Million LBS
Snow plows in ,airing al Eoston Logan 11109 UiOnal Aityon.Though the same Jaway sionn hit
Eosmnand\ere So.k.lhi cries'.irpons had vPy different outcomes.
• Flights (takeoffs & "Pa�
landings) : 401,000
Logan's passenger demand is highly correlated to
economic conditions and other socio-economic factors
Change to Logan Passengers
10%
8%
5%
0% -- _ - -
-5%
-10% ��-
-9%
-15%
-20% -1 R%
9/11 & Recession 2008 Recession Recovery (2015 to
2016)
Logan's passenger forecast is dependent on
continued economic conditions. The 2017 ESPR
will provide a more detailed forecast...
Passengers
(Million)
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
o° oti oti oP o° o`, o� o1 o`0 o� ti° titi titi ti� ti° ti� ti� ti�,yo do ,yo do ,yo ,yo do ,yo do ,yo ,yo ,yo do ,yo do ,yo do ,yo
= Recession Period
Continued growth in aviation demand will be dependent on
economic conditions... For example, oil prices have been on
the rise since hitting a low in June/July 2017
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.
Airlines Raise Ticket Prices as I'iiel Casts
Surge
OW L azon the la rgest axpe nse for most.Vaines prompting nigher domestlefaror,surcnarges on
intematJonaiflauhts
_ Brent Crude Oil Prices-6 Months
$74
$71
$70
$68
.nnwU nr�Rrr-Inn raa�W tl r[Im ul I lw.nl pra nr ruW Fmk."IF Ill. Or' P r4r=k
$66
8y Duuy Cumu wt¢rid dlisun SicTrr
U Dilated June 6,201.i 4!U1 p.m.L I Ssa
$62
Jet-fuel prlees have surged more than—%D%over the pact vem:
aJnr1 Tl�lta Arr i.nnrz inr �'�w1.84%.a tnn�t ita.ylrcafit rxrrrta S6o
December January February March April May
]Delta,the nation•&Xia.2 carrier,raid Wedneedav It could take six to 12 months to recoup the
extra fueleacts via pricier tickets_
FUC1i3apainthCSmffllc largest cxp'cnseformaatairhncs,accounting for about e.quarterof
oprretinz costa.'111c rcccntaun up in praces cchocs thcjump ecen from LuuJ to Zu"which
€irstspawned stand-alone smrhar=on inany international Ri;ehts.
Oil Prices vs PAX — As oil prices are projected to rise,
passenger growth is projected to decrease
THE LINES CONVERGE. AS OIL PRICES RISE, THE FUNDAMENTALS BEGIN TO CONVERGE
IN 2018
'I'I tPCE CAFA —CENTRE FOR 4=710dN,IATA.O®LPRICIEN'ET,THE ECONOMIST
doo
9Vllaf1p11"I� U
A
1200
115 a
r
O
140 110 n
T
� G
120
105 0
u
v
a 100 100
w ' �
m 80 95
• Y• S
GO (��
JO `
40 85 s
rs
Q
20 _ ...... .... .... .. . .... ..... .... $0 A
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 201G 2017
GRAPHICS KEY
�g�,o
i4 WIWIU Passenger Growth Oil Barrel Price
Aviation Industry Trends
Safety and Security Geopolitical Changes: Impact on international air
travel; Terrorism: Adapting to new terrorism
techniques, Homegrown Violent Extremists, aviation
continues to be soft target
Increased Demand Strong US economy and growing economies
globally, growing populations, reduced prices
Cargo Rebounding market, particularly in Asia
Airline Economics Decline of fuel/energy prices, industry consolidation,
high load factors and capacity growth in ASMs
(available seat miles)
Reduced Ticket Prices For Passengers Airline cost reductions, Low Cost Carriers (LCCs) /
Ultra Low Cost Carriers (ULCCs) driving down base
fares, hub and spoke model
Technology Enhancing customer service, new and more
efficient aircraft, navigation, security/cybersecurity
Airport Access Landside Trends Introduction of TNCs and EVs, and future AVs
Safety And Security Is The Number One Priority At
Logan Airport
®® �L flOSTON NFWS-MG59IVF GOM
�rfVE
Boston Logan one of the safest airports, TSA director says
Comment Posted on August 18.2017 at 7:03 AM
II ..
(Wikimedia)
110
shares
By Michelle Williams,MirhwnwwilbamA0mav1live.com
Safety is the top priority for Transportation Security Administration employees and
Boston is doing well,according to the new director of the TSA.
David Pekoske visited Boston Logan International Airport on Thursday.
Airport security effectiveness is our number one job."he told Boston 25.a job Boston
officials are doing well.
"Boston has a long history of being on the leading edge of security and being one of
our very best airports for partnerships across the board."he told the television
station.
Influence of Technology — Passenger
Processing
• Customer service and passenger process — Airport Operators and
Airlines
— Emerging technologies for automated processes such self check-in
on mobile devices and kiosks for bag tags—reducing processing
time by up to 30 percent
— Integrating flow of information to and from stakeholders (such as
reserving parking) — importance of cybersecurity
• Security Aspects — TSA Passenger/Baggage Screening
— Automated Screening Lanes (ASLs) and explosive detection
integration (CT Scanner)
— Biometrics to automate verification (piloting)
Influence of Technology — Aircraft and
Equipment
• The aviation industry is embracing technology and it is improving
what is being flown and how:
— Aircraft
• Longer range Modern., Efficient Aircraft
• Quieter C-Series
• Lower emissions 737-MAX
• Right-size seat capacity for market A321-NEO
• Opens new markets A350
• Lower threshold for profit
777
— Navigation
787
2016 E D R
For over 30 years Massport has prepared the longest detailed
tracking of cumulative environmental impacts of any US
airport
Provides detailed data on Logan Airport, planning, projects,
ongoing studies, mitigation status and annual environmental
conditions
4: Analyzes cumulative effects of
Logan Airport operations and
activities -
The EDR/ESPR process was
developed to allow individual
projects to be considered in the
broader Airport-wide context
Environmental Data Report
EDR Outline
• Introduction/Executive Summary (English/Spanish)
• Activity Levels (passengers, aircraft, cargo)
• Airport Planning
• Regional Transportation
• Ground Access to and from Logan Airport
• Noise Abatement
• Air Quality/Emissions Reduction
• Water Quality/Environmental Compliance and Management
• Project Mitigation Tracking
550,000
Logan Airport Aircraft Operations are Down
507,449
SOO,OOD
C 450,000 /
O
d 391,222
0 400,000
Logan Continues to 350,000
Handle Increased 300,000
Passengers with 1990 1998 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
38.0
Logan Airport Passengers are Up
36.
Reduced Operations 36.0
34.0 /
O 32.0 /
30.0 J
28.0 26.;S _\ /
uOpi 26.0 �" \ V
aa,
24.0
22.0
20.0
1990 1998 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Projects Status
s Terminal E New Large Aircraft Wing (complete)
a Terminal E Modernization (Final Design)
Logan Parking Project (Permitting)
a Runway 4R Light Pier Replacement (complete)
a Terminal B Optimization (Construction)
a Terminal C Optimization and Roadway Improvements (Planning)
Convenience and Filling Station, Transportation Network
Company (TNC) and Taxi Pool Relocations (final design)
Runway Incursion Mitigation ( RIM ) Study (Nearing Completion)
Automated People Mover (APM ) (Feasibility)
ffi Piers Park 11 (Design)
Piers Park I I I (Feasibility)
Massport Airports Contributing to
Regional Air Transportation System
Worcester Regional Airport's role is growing
Massport is investing $100 million over 10 years
to revitalize and grow ORH commercial operations V, a !T__JIIIIIIII�
New Category III Instrument Landing System
will significantly improve ORH's all-weather reliability (opened March 2018)
JetBlue has already served over 500,000 ORH passengers
JetBlue service to La Guardia started May 2018
American Airlines service to Philadelphia recently announced
Hanscom Field, 2nd busiest New England airport (2017: 128,598ops)
Premier general aviation airport
Reliever to Logan Airport
Rectrix FBO open
r !:
New Jet Aviation FBO now open
Ground Access to Logan
HOV Mode Share to Logan grew from 28%
in 2013 to 30.5% in 2016
* Logan Express Bus ridership increased by
42,665 from 2015 to 2016 �
*: Rental Car Center Consolidated bus fleet
* Bus & Limousine lots relocated
Free Silver Line boardings at Logan Airport
continue (since June 2012)
Y✓ h �'� I
Long-Term Parking Management Plan has
a comprehensive approach to parking } '
5s
operations and supply — the 2016 EDR `
includes current status. s
Over 97% of Logan's Fleet is Stage 4 or Better — With about
18% Meeting FAA's Latest Stage 5 Standard
Table 6-2 Percentage of Commercial Jet Operations by Part 36 Stage Category'
Stage 2
Stage 5 Stage 4 Certificated Recertificated Greater than
Year Requirements Requirements' Stage 3 stage 33 75,000 lbs. Total
1990 N/A N/A 51.1% 0.0% 48.9% 100%
2000 N/A N/A 70.0% 21.0% 9.0% 100%
2010 N/A 93.2% 4.7% 1.1 w 0.0% 100%
2011 N/A 95.5% 4.00/c 0.5W 0.0% 100%
2012 N/A 95.8% 4.1% 0.1%° 0.0% 100%
2013 N/A 97A% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 100%
2014 N/A 97A% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0'.b 100%
2015 N/A 96.7% 3.3% 0.0% OA% 100°k
2016 17.8961 79.2% 3.0% 0.0% OA% 100%
Sourcr. MassporYs Noise Monitoring System,Revenue Office and HMMH,2017.
Over the long term, Logan Airport's Noise and Population within
65 dB DNL contour dramatically reduced compared to 1990
xeehm
S A
Rerere
Everen
120,000
Chelsea
Sonervill¢ -�
100,000 CM1arlertown Eazt RR 22L Wuo[hmp
■ Pop within 65... B0,[,n 15R1 Sit
80,000
8osron L
12
aR M
33
60,000
uurn
ao:ron
40,000 ¢1Rcle 1s
Long� Gior9+�Is.
Thampzorth
20,000
portfi¢srer Hu(I
— . ■ S4uanmm
0
1980 1990 2000 2010 2014 2015 2016 axe
serrac xnutµ
(AEDT)(AEDT) x�wisu sw�aab+�ruory aw
IGURE 1-13 DNL 65 d8 Contour Comparison
2316 Environmental Data Report
with Historical Contour
0 2016 DNL Contour(AEDT 26
Q 1996 DNL Contour
O 1990 DNL Contour a u 500° 'nor`
Sound Insulabon Areas
Massport has Implemented Many Programs to Reduce Emissions
Logan Express Improvements: Silver Line HOV Improvements:
Logan Express Back Bay/MBTA Discount 2005 Purchase of 8 Silver Line Buses
Braintree Facility Purchase Mid-Life rehab of 8 Silver Line Buses
- Framingham Garage Operating subsidy to T for SL1
- Curbs Realignment for HOV priority Subsidy for Free inbound SL1
2:15 am Service (22 hours a day) New SL3 route to Chelsea
Vacation discounts
Other Improvements:
Sustainabilitv Measures: Unified Bus system reduced 100 shuttle
trips/hour to 30 shuttle trips/hour
Renewable Power (solar/wind) Massport hybrid/CNG shuttle buses
. LEED Buildings Energy & GHG Goals Private bus — marketing — signage
campaign
e EV Infrastructure (cars & GSE) Water Shuttle Subsidy — Shuttle Bus
Energy Efficiency Upgrades
continued
Long Range Trend of Reduced Emissions
Emission Levels at Logan Airport (kg/day)
■ NOx ■ CO N VOC
18,000
16,000
T 14,000
�a
12,000
v
Q- 10,000
M 8,000
o 6,000
Y
4,000
2,000 Ila
1990 2000 2005 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Logan GHG Emissions
Remain Less than 1% of Statewide Totals
Scope 1 -
Massort
0.65 MMT of GHGs emitted iz0
Scope 2 in 2016 <1% of state-wide Electricity
8%
total (compared to 0. 63
MMT in 2015)
Massport controlled ib Logan Airport
Scope 3 • Tenants
0.9%
emissions (Scope 1) remain & Passenger
Vehicles
at 12% of the total Logan 79%
GHG emissions in 2016 41
State of
Massachusetts
99.1%
Massport Has Extensive Sustainability and
Resiliency Programs
• Massport is focused on a holistic
approach — ensuring Economic
viability, Operational efficiency,
Natural resources conservation, and ,
tt
Social responsibility •
• Massport released its 2nd
Sustainable Massport Report in April
2018, which provides a progress —
summary of sustainability efforts at
Logan Airport
• Extensive Massport-wide
Resilency Goals
• Vulnerability Assessment for key facilities
• Floodproofing Measures
• Assessing next steps
Review Schedule for the 2016 EDR
• May 15, 2018 2016 EDR filed with MEPA Office
• May 23, 2018 30 day Public Comment Period Commences
• June 12, 2018 Public Information Meeting at the Logan Rental Car Center
• June 22, 2018 MEPA Comment period closes
• June 29, 2018 Secretary's Certificate/Scope for 2017 ESPR Issued
Submit Comments By June 22"d To:
Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs
Executuve Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA)
Attn: MEPA Office
Anne Canaday, EEA No. 3247
100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900
Boston MA 02114
Massport and FAA RNAV Study
Update to Massport CAC
mm,
MIT Block 1 Ideas Overview
ICRT
FAA Technical Team Internal Meetings Ongoing Includes Visit to Boston TRACON in May
Block 1
• Departure Mods
— 33L and 27
• Reduced speed departures (1-D1)
— 220 Knots (clean) to 10,000'
— NADP-1 to 6,000'
— 15R
• RNAV waypoint relocation (1-D2)
— 22L/R
• RNAV waypoint relocation
— Climb to intercept course (1-Ma)
— Climb to altitude then direct (1-Mb)
• Heading-based departure (1-Mc)
• Arrival Mods
— 33L Low-noise overwater approach procedures
• Overwater RNAV Instrument Approach
Procedure with RNP Overlay which as FAA announced
closely as possible flies the jetBlue RNAV procedure could be
Visual track (1-Ala)
• Public distribution mechanism for the in place by this
jetBlue RNAV Visual procedure (1-Alb) September
MIT Reduced Speed Departures
ICRT Proposed Modification
Flops up
• Standard departure Initial chmb speed
procedures vary by airline —15
Thrust reduction height
•Select dumb duust(as
ueeded)
• Baseline: Typical profile
includes thrust reduction at
1 ,000' AGL followed by an ,,I ,,R ccelera„o
u height
flaiss chedu
acceleration to 250 kt climb _Route / Reract un sle
speed and flap retraction
Thrust set Positive rate of climb
•Retract tear
• Recommended procedure:
a. Thrust reduction at 1 ,000' AGL
followed by an acceleration
to 220 kt climb speed or
minimum safe airspeed in
clean configuration,
whichever is greater until a
TBD altitude (i.e. 6,000' or
10,000')
b. NADP-1 extended to 6,000'
Simulator Tested for Flyability
3
rrtZ;;' jetl3lue "RNAV Visual"
\\ (Saugus Y •, RNAV Draft Procedure
\\
y - S�WiEVE�__
t
• • • ' `Rove a
(Winthrop 1`
Carr6ndge
a �) 'Boston Logan International Airport
f�CBOston
.yam r
NO + x
r okhhe...' {,a _ •::.- _ M1 _ .1.=^SAW\—-------
------------------
"MO R R N
i
\CMYNOT
• • i y
`= ERT Block 2 Procedures Under Consideration
May be updated after additional input from the MCAC
Subcommittee Meeting April 18tn
Block 2
More complex due to operational/technical
barriers or results in shifting of noise (equity issue)
• Departure Mods
— 33L and 27
• Introduce dispersion with Open SID or
direct-to flexibility on RNAV procedures
• Arrival Mods
— Low-noise overwater approach
procedures
• 4R
— RNAV approach to 4R with RNP
Overlay
— RNP approach to 4R
• 22L
RNAV approach to 22L with RNP Preliminary/Subject
Overlay to Change
\ ssport/FAA MOU Process and MIT Technical Timeline
CRT (Preliminary/Subject to Change. Version as-of 05/14/18)
• Block 1 (ongoing elements)
— MCAC/Public Meetings/MIT Report/MPA Ltr to FAA Feb 2017 to Dec 2017
— FAA internal review (safety, efficiency, NEPA) Ongoing
— FAA Implementation Process Ongoing
• Block 2
— MCAC/Public Meetings/Technical Review Feb. 2017 — Hold pending Blockl
— MIT Draft Technical Approach to Block 2 December 2018 —April 2018
— MIT Brief MCAC on Block 2 Technical Approach and Ideas April 2018
— MCAC provide any additional ideas from April Meeting April - June 2018
— MIT finalize technical approach (noise metrics and Summer 2018
noise changes analytics/graphics)
— MIT conduct feasibility review of ideas, identify ideas to model May - Dec 2018 Including interim
_ briefings to MCAC and
and initial/follow up modeling Briefings to general
— MIT Brief MCAC on model results for each idea Sept/Oct 2018 public
— MCAC Meetings on Block 2 ideas Oct-Dec 2018 _
— MCAC Block 2 final recommendations to Massport TBD
— MPA Recommendation to FAA TBD
— FAA internal review (safety, efficiency, NEPA) TBD
— FAA implementation (may include extensive NEPA process) TBD
6