HomeMy Public PortalAbout2010-085 Resolution Approving Comp Plan Amend Regarding 1525 Deerhill RdMember Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-85
RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT REGARDING THE FUTURE LAND USE OF CERTAIN
PROPERTIES AT 1525 DEERHILL ROAD AND 1700 DEERHILL ROAD
WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the "City") is a municipal corporation, organized and
existing under the laws of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Joanne Reiser Wolhfers ("Wolhfers") owns property in the City of Medina
at 1525 Deerhill Road which has the property identification number 26-118-23-22-0001 on file
with Hennepin County, Minnesota, and which is identified as parcel A in Exhibit A attached
hereto ("Parcel A");
WHEREAS, Elizabeth Langdon Ringer ("Ringer") owns property in the City of Medina
at 1700 Deerhill Road which has the property identification number 27-118-23-11-0002 on file
with Hennepin County, Minnesota, and which is identified as parcel B in Exhibit A attached
hereto ("Parcel B"); and
WHEREAS, Ringer also owns the adjacent 8.78 acre property in the City of Medina
having the property identification number 27-118-23-14-0003 on file with Hennepin County,
Minnesota and which is identified as parcel C in Exhibit A attached hereto ("Parcel C"); and
WHEREAS, Wolhfers and Ringer (collectively, the "Applicants") have requested
approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the future land use of their property
from Rural Residential to Agricultural; and
WHEREAS, the planning commission held a duly called public hearing on
November 9, 2010 where testimony was heard from all interested parties and following the
hearing recommended approval of the amendment; and
WHEREAS, on December 7, 2010, the city council reviewed the amendment,
considered the recommendations of the planning commission and heard comments from
interested parties; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment does not substantially change the type of
development that is planned to occur in the area, and has no practical impact on the City's
population forecasts or Traffic Assignment Zone allocations; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the City of Medina,
Minnesota, that the Comprehensive Plan amendment as identified in Exhibit B, attached hereto,
is hereby approved, subject to the following terms and conditions:
(1) The amendment shall not become effective until approved by the Metropolitan Council
Resolution No. 2010-85
December 21, 2010
and formally adopted by the City Council; and
(2) The amendment shall not become effective for Parcels B and C until such time as these
lots are combined into one parcel; and
(3) The Applicants shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City
for the cost of reviewing the request and preparing relevant documents.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that city staff is authorized to submit the amendment
of the Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review.
Dated: December 21, 2010.
j7''1/k(
T.M. Crosby, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:
Z,A 614, itt_.„
Chad M. Adams, City Administrator -Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Weir and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Crosby, Johnson, Siitari, Smith, Weir
And the following voted against same:
None
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2010-85 2
December 21, 2010
Exhibit A
Map Identifying Subject Properties
TY tFC1M47 21
J
I��/�Na��I�r�1•I�a�Iw as..1M IIIIM1IIIM.IM mim 1so11111.0,111.111M1NI1111111.a
hay Na^*
Resolution No. 2010-85 3
December 21, 2010
Exhibit B
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Proposed Amendment to Map 5-2: change Future Land Use designation of parcels as
shown below.
C1EaiMUT
Proposed Amendment:
Existing- 80 4 gross acre (57.85 net acre) Rural Residential
4 forecasted households
Proposed: 80-4 gross acre (57.85 net acre) Agncuitural
2 forecasted households
0 0.25
Map 5-2 MEDINA
Future Land Use Plan
Guide Plan
t Rurat Residential
- Agriculture
Developing -Post 2030
Loa Denwty Res 2.0 - 3.49 Ufa
Medium needy Res 3.5 - 6.99 U/A
® High °empty Res 7 - 30 U/A
11111 Mused Use 3.5 - 6.99 U/A
- Mused Use - Business 7 - 45 U/A
- Commeraal
— General Business
Ins:Wend Business
Prrvate Reaeabon (PREC1
- Parka and Recreation
- P-R - State or Regional
Open Space
- Publd Semi-Publie 0 Ufa
Closed Sanitary land6N
RgM-of-Way
'TM nap m not Perfedly pease.
act u1 boundaries may vary, and
Ntdtad be feld serried_
MapUpdated: 12-13-3110
Last Artensed: Proposed, Under Review
Adaeted.- Noodled 17. 2009
name data current as of Ocbber 2006
UTM. Zara 15N, NAD B3
Susie- 1:3000D
Resolution No. 2010-85 4
December 21, 2010
Proposed Amendment to Table 5-B: delete the stricken text and insert the text as
shown below.
TABLE 5-B
Future Land Use Plan
Land Use Designation
Gross Area
Net Area
Acres
Percent
Acres Percent
Agricultural (AGJ
Rural Residential (RR)
Low Density Residential (LDR
Medium Density Residential (MDR
High Density Residential (HDR) _
Mixed Use (MU)
Mixed Use - Business MU-B
Developing Post-2030
...........
Commercial (C)
General Business (GB)
Industrial (IBA
Closed Sanitary Landfill (SL
Public Semi -Public (PSP
Parks and Recreation
Parks and Recreation _ Reac ional or State
Private Recreation (PREC�
OpenSpace (OS).__._......__.._...._....--._....__._......_...................._
Rights-of-Way.._..._........._._.........._........................_..._.._..................................................
Lakes
Wetlands and Floodplains
108169
7,978
_ 7.897
9-61 1 % 76 133
0.4 0_8%
/15.9% 5708.7 29.3%
45.6% 5,029 29.0%
944 5.5% 630 3.7%
428 2.5% 288 1.7%
123 0.7% 103 0.6%
379 2.2% 271 1.6%
59 0.3% 39 0.2%
444 2.6% 337.........._...-_-..1...9%
_409 2.4% 290 1.7%
559 I 3.2% 359 f 2.1 %
68 _-............-0.4%.._.._......................_48................._i............._._.0.3%0
192 ' 1.1 % 106 0.6%
271 I 1.6% 173 1.0%
93 0.5% 46 0.3%
2,519 14.5% 1,528 _� 8.8%
_358 I 2.1 % 272 i 1.6%
208 1.2% 153 0.9%
_912 5.1% 912 5.1%
1,283_7.4%.._........._.........._1,283......_7- 7.4%.....
5,335 ' 30.8%
Total City
17,335
17,335
Resolution No. 2010-85 5
December 21, 2010
Proposed Amendment to Table 5-F: delete the stricken text and insert the underlined text as
shown below.
Table 5-F
Land Use in 5-Year Increments
Land Use Designation
Allowed Density
Ranges
Min
Max
Residential Uses
-Rural Residential 2.5 acres or less
-Rural Residential 2.5 -10 acres
-Rural Residential 10-40 acres
- Rural Residential 40+ acres
-Agricultural 40+ acres
...................
I 1 U/10A TBDt
1 U/40A 1 U/10A
i
Low Density Residential (LDR)
Medium Density Residential 3.5
(MDR)
High Density Residential (HDR) ! 7
Mixed Use (MU)2 3.5
Mixed Use - Business (MU-B)3 7
Future Developing Areas
Commercial Uses
Commercial (C)
General Business (GB)
Industrial (IB)
Institutional Uses
Public Semi -Public (PSP)
Parks and Recreation
Parks and Recreation -
Regional/State
......................................................
Private Recreation (PREC)
Open Space (OS)
Closed Sanitary Landfill (SL)
Subtotal Unsewered
Right-of-Ways
..................................................................................................
Lakes
Wetlands and Floodplains
Total City
1 U/40A
1 U/40A
Existing
2008
2010
2015 I 2020
2025
2030 I %
Change
2010.2030
acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres)
I 212 212 212 212 212 1 0%
2197 2207 2217
3591 3661 3691
1977 1897 , 1857
1897 1817 1777
;
499
;
e_ 19 489189 488189
8086 8086 8086 ' 8086
3.49 346 600 713
6.9 181 326 428 428
911
30 17 21 21 21
6.9 0 80 207 207
45
1 U/10A
5 i 59
2501 I 1954
2227
3721
..................
1817
1737
2237
3751
..................
1777
1697
409
489LU ._..........189........._!..._.._....__0%0
8086 I 8086 0%
1.8%
944 944 57%
428 I 428 I 31%
21 1 123 486%
i 280 1 379 374%
59 I 59 59 59 0%
1372..........1................982_......_-I-----....__— 771 _.......444__...._I._.._..__--77
°/o
214 375
25 25 68 68
362 I 409 ' 60%
480 1 558 1 507%
_68_..__._............_68...........1._.__.......172 /o
271................................... 271271 271 , 271 0%
93 93 1 93 1 93 93 1 93
i0%
_..._...._.__..._._..............._....._........._..._..-..._.._............_.....................................___........._...................._..._........._........_.
2519 2519 1 2519 1 2519 2519 ' 2519 0%
358 358 1 358 1 358 358 1 358 0%
208 208 i 208 ' 208 208 1 208 0%
192 192.... 192 192 192 r 192 0%
To be determined later for cluster/open-space developments.
Metropolitan Council's long term sewer service area.
2 This land use require a minimum 50% of the developable property includes a residential component within the density range
3 The Mixed Use -Business (MU-B) land use requires residential units equivalent to the minimum density over the entire developable area. The
MU-B "Existing 2008" acreage is based on the approximate area which has been developed consistent with the Objectives of the MU-B land
i__....._._use.:_..._......................_._..__............._.
Density in excess of one unit per ten acres will not be allowed within
I
Resolution No. 2010-85
December 21, 2010
6