HomeMy Public PortalAbout09.19.2023 City Council Meeting Packet Posted 9/15/2023 Page 1 of 1
AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE MEDINA CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, September 19, 2023
7:00 P.M.
Medina City Hall
2052 County Road 24
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Minutes of the September 5, 2023, Work Session Meeting
B. Minutes of the September 5, 2023, Regular City Council Meeting
V. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Adopt Resolution Approving the Decertification of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9
B. Adopt Ordinance Amending the School Lake Natures Preserve Conservation Design-Planned Unit
Development District Pertaining to Lot 2, Block 3
C. Adopt Resolution to Publish Ordinance Amending the School Lake Natures Preserve Conservation
Design-Planned Unit Development District by Title and Summary
D. Adopt Resolution Granting Preliminary and Final Approval of the School Lake Nature Preserve 3rd
Addition Plat
VI. COMMENTS
A. From Citizens on Items Not on the Agenda
B. Park Commission
C. Planning Commission
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Resolution Providing for the Issuance and Sale of General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2023A,
in the Proposed Aggregate Principal Amount of $2,215,000
B. Tree Preservation Ordinance Discussion
VIII. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT
IX. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
X. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS
XI. ADJOURN
Meeting Rules of Conduct to Address
the City Council:
• Fill out & turn in comment card
• Give name and address
• Indicate if representing a group
• Limit remarks to 3 minutes
(period may be reduced by
Council)
MEMORANDUM
TO: Medina Mayor and City Council
FROM: Scott Johnson, City Administrator
DATE OF REPORT: September 14, 2023
DATE OF MEETING: September 19, 2023
SUBJECT: City Council Meeting Report
V. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Adopt Resolution Approving the Decertification of Tax Increment Financing District No.
1-9 – The reason for decertifying at this time is per guidance from the Office of the State
Auditor. The TIF District must be decertified once there are no outstanding obligations
or there are sufficient funds on hand to pay the outstanding obligations. Since the final
payment of the 2016A bond is on February 1, 2024 (which is paid with TIF revenues
received in December 2023), Ehlers recommends this District be decertified as of
December 31, 2023. Staff recommends approval.
See attached resolution.
B. Ordinance Amending the School Lake Nature Preserve Conservation Design-Planned
Unit Development District Pertaining to Lot 2, Block 3 – School Lake Nature Preserve
LLC has requested to separate the area of the formal garden from one of the lots within the
development. The garden area is proposed as a stand alone outlot. The Council reviewed on
July 5 and directed staff to prepare approval documents, after the applicant has provided
updates to the plat. The plat updates have been provided per direction and staff recommends
approval.
See attached ordinance.
C. Resolution to Publish Ordinance Amending the School Lake Nature Preserve
Conservation Design-Planned Unit Development District by Title and Summary –
Attached is a resolution for summary publication of the ordinance. Staff recommends
approval.
See attached resolution.
D. Resolution Granting Preliminary and Final Approval of the School Lake Nature Preserve
3rd Addition Plat – School Lake Nature Preserve LLC has requested to separate the area of
the formal garden from one of the lots within the development. The garden area is proposed
as a stand alone outlot. The Council reviewed on July 5 and directed staff to prepare
2
approval documents, after the applicant has provided updates to the plat. The plat updates
have been provided per direction and staff recommends approval.
See attached resolution.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Resolution Providing for the Issuance and Sale of General Obligation Improvement
Bonds, Series 2023A, in the Proposed Aggregate Principal Amount of $2,215,000 – In
2022, during the CIP review, it was determined that bonding would be beneficial for the
funding of road projects to not deplete the road fund balance. Road projects from 2022
and 2023 were included with the proposed bond. A representative from Ehlers will be
present to walk through the bonding process.
Recommended Motion: Motion to adopt resolution providing for the issuance and sale of
general obligation improvement bonds, Series 2023A, in the proposed aggregate principal
amount of $2,215,000.
B. Tree Preservation Ordinance Discussion – The City’s Tree Preservation ordinance
regulates the removal of trees for construction and development activities. The ordinance
was adopted in 2006. City Council members and staff discussed reviewing aspects of the
tree preservation regulations during review of recent land use applications. Staff has
included the existing regulations with suggested changes. Staff is requesting City
Council review and discussion on the proposed changes to the ordinance.
Recommended Motion: Motion to direct staff to present the ordinance related to Tree
Preservation for action at the following consent agenda [with the following
recommended changes, if any].
X. APPROVAL TO PAY BILLS
Recommended Motion: Motion to approve the bills, order check numbers 054772-
054837 for $1,250,904.74, EFT 006985E-007002E for $65,260.63, payroll EFT
0512993-0513207 for $68,579.71.
Medina City Council Work Session Minutes
September 5, 2023
DRAFT 1
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES OF 2
SEPTEMBER 5, 2023 3
4
The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in work session on September 5, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. 5
at the Medina City Hall, 2052 County Road 24, Medina, MN. 6
7
I. Call to Order 8
9
Members present: Martin, Albers, Cavanaugh, DesLauriers, Reid 10
Members absent: None 11
Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Clerk/Assistant to the City 12
Administrator Caitlyn Walker, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, Finance Director Erin 13
Barnhart, Public Safety Director Jason Nelson, Planning Director Dusty Finke 14
15
II. Budget Discussion 16
Finance Director Erin Barnhart presented the proposed 2024 general fund budget and 17
preliminary property tax levy which will be presented for certification at the September 5, 2023, 18
regular City Council meeting. 19
20
The proposed 2024 tax levy is $6,139,990, an increase of 2.3% from 2023. The preliminary 21
estimates show the City’s 2024 property tax rate as 20.958%, a 7.1% decrease from the 2023 rate 22
of 22.557%. The City’s proposed General fund budget is $6,724,860, which is an increase of 23
$154,816 from 2023’s budget of $6,570,044. Of the increase in general fund expenditures, 24
$409,816 is attributed to operations and $100,000 for a future fire facility, a decrease of 25
$355,000 from 2023. The operational increases include increases in materials/supplies, fuel, 26
contracted services, insurance, utilities, staff market wage adjustments, and staff cost of living 27
adjustments. 28
29
The City Council and staff also highlighted items in the Capital Improvement Plan related to 30
parks, roads, and utility projects that they plan to discuss in more detail at the December 5, 2023 31
regular City Council meeting. 32
33
The final budget and property tax levy will be presented for final certification on December 5, 34
2023. The final levy can remain the same or be reduced from the September 5, 2023, 35
certification, but it cannot be increased. Between now and December, staff will finalize the 2024 36
Capital Improvement Plan and the fee schedule. 37
38
III. Adjourn 39
DesLauriers made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:02 p.m. on September 5, 2023. Albers 40
seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 41
42
43
_________________________ 44
Medina City Council Work Session Minutes
September 5, 2023
Kathleen Martin, Mayor 1
2
Attest: 3
4
____________________________ 5
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk 6
7
8
9
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
September 5, 2023
1
DRAFT 1
2
MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 5, 2023 3
4
The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on September 5, 2023 at 5
7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Martin presided. 6
7
I. ROLL CALL 8
9
Members present: Albers, Cavanaugh, DesLauriers, Martin, and Reid. 10
11
Members absent: None. 12
13
Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Clerk Caitlyn Walker, Attorney 14
Dave Anderson, Finance Director Erin Barnhart, City Engineer Jim Stremel, City 15
Planning Director Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and Chief of Police 16
Jason Nelson. 17
18
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:00 p.m.) 19
20
III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:00 p.m.) 21
The agenda was approved as presented. 22
23
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:00 p.m.) 24
25
A. Approval of the August 15, 2023 Work Session City Council Meeting 26
Minutes 27
Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to approve the August 15, 2023 work session 28
City Council meeting minutes as presented. Motion passed unanimously. 29
30
B. Approval of the August 15, 2023 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes 31
Martin noted that prior to the meeting Johnson distributed changes that she had 32
proposed for incorporation. 33
34
Moved by Martin, seconded by Albers, to approve the August 15, 2023 regular City 35
Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. 36
37
V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:01 p.m.) 38
39
A. Set Date of Truth in Taxation Meeting for December 5, 2023 40
B. Adopt Resolution Accepting Donations for the 2023 Cops N’ Bobbers 41
Program 42
C. Adopt Resolution Authorizing Medina Recreations Inc. to Dispense Liquor 43
at Hamel Legion Park During Medina Celebration Day and Approve the 44
Indemnification Agreement 45
D. Approve 2024 Solution Builders Agreement 46
E. Approve Memorandum of Agreement with Minnehaha Creek Watershed 47
District for the Morningside Ravine Stabilization Project 48
F. Approve Trail Sealcoating Services Agreement with Gopher State Sealcoat 49
G. Approve WSB Professional Services Proposal for Grant Writing 50
H. Approve Data Storage Server Sharing and Governance Agreement 51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
September 5, 2023
2
Moved by Albers, seconded by Cavanaugh, to approve the consent agenda. Motion 1
passed unanimously. 2
3
VI. COMMENTS (7:03 p.m.) 4
5
A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda 6
There were none. 7
8
B. Park Commission 9
Scherer highlighted recent work of the parks department including the seating area and 10
the kayak racks that will soon be installed at Lakeshore Park. He commented that the 11
pickleball sound study for Hunter Park has been completed and the report is being 12
finalized. 13
14
C. Planning Commission 15
Finke reported that the Planning Commission will meet the following week to hold public 16
hearings to consider ordinances related to edible cannabinoid products and the 17
continued discussion related to tree preservation. 18
19
VII. NEW BUSINESS 20
21
A. 2024 Preliminary Budget & Tax Levy (7:05 p.m.) 22
Martin commented that the Council held a work session/budget open house prior to the 23
Council meeting where there was an in-depth presentation on the budget. She noted 24
multiple meetings have been held throughout the year related to the budget to reach this 25
point. 26
27
Barnhart stated that tonight they will ask the Council to approve the preliminary budget 28
and levy for certification to Hennepin County, noting that the final budget public meeting 29
will be held on December 5th and at that time the final budget and levy would be 30
adopted. She reviewed proposed balanced general fund budget, which is an increase of 31
$154,000 from the previous year. She highlighted increases and decreases to the 32
budget and provided details on staffing. 33
34
Martin provided additional details on the police contract noting that they worked 35
collaboratively to develop a new pay scale and benefits for that department to ensure 36
that the police are paid adequately for the services they provide and risk they experience 37
in the line of duty. 38
39
Barnhart reviewed the proposed property tax levy for 2024, which is an increase of 40
$139,044 which equates to 2.3 percent above that of 2023. She reviewed the projected 41
market values received from Hennepin County, noting the combination of new single-42
family home construction and increase to property values. She stated that the 2024 tax 43
rate for Medina will result in a decrease of 7.1 percent. She recognized that this was a 44
brief presentation and noted that she does have more detailed information for members 45
of the public that may be interested. 46
47
Martin commented that a number of questions were asked and answered during the 48
budget open house earlier tonight. 49
50
51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
September 5, 2023
3
1. Resolution Approving Proposed Tax Levy for 2024 1
Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to adopt the resolution approving the 2024 2
preliminary tax levy. Motion passed unanimously. 3
4
2. Resolution Approving Proposed General Fund Budget for 2024 5
Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Cavanaugh, to adopt the resolution approving the 6
2024 preliminary general fund budget. Motion passed unanimously. 7
8
3. Resolution Reducing Debt Service Tax Levies for 2024 9
Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Reid, to adopt the resolution reducing debt service 10
tax levies for 2024. Motion passed unanimously. 11
12
13
B. 1755 Tamarack Drive After-the-Fact Replacement Plan and Voluntary 14
Restoration (7:15 p.m.) 15
Johnson reported that the applicant constructed a detached storage building without 16
submitting a permit application and the City issued a stop work order, although the 17
construction was significantly completed. He stated that approximately 3,899 square 18
feet of wetland was filled without obtaining the proper approvals and without following 19
the buffer requirements. He stated that the structure also does not meet the setback 20
requirements from the northern property line. 21
22
Finke stated that when the City became aware of this, it looked for a plan to mitigate the 23
wetland impacts. He noted that the original suggestion was to solely mitigate through 24
the purchase of wetland credits, but the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) met onsite 25
and there was an interest to try to minimize the impacts that had already occurred. He 26
stated that a portion of the impacts are proposed to be restored which would result in an 27
impact of 1,836 square feet of impact. He stated that the original proposal was to 28
mitigate at a rate of two to one, but the state rules do allow for mitigation up to four to 29
one which is what is being recommended by the TEP along with the restoration as 30
described in the application. He stated that the draft Notice of Decision was provided in 31
the packet and staff suggests some latitude that the restoration would be subject to an 32
agreement where the applicant agrees to complete the work. He recommended 33
approval of the replacement plan, with the rate of four to one and the restoration as 34
described. 35
36
DesLauriers asked if the City would also go back to charge the permitting fees that 37
should have been paid. 38
39
Finke commented that the building permit would be assessed a penalty and the wetland 40
replacement plan has been fully reimbursed. 41
42
Martin asked if the fees of the City Attorney to draft the agreement would also be 43
charged to the applicant. 44
45
Finke confirmed that would be part of the wetland replacement plan. 46
47
Martin acknowledged the difficulty in these after the fact situations, noting that it can 48
seem punitive, but the regulations of the City must be followed. She believed the 49
proposed action makes sense and confirmed the consensus of the Council. 50
51
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes
September 5, 2023
4
Moved by Reid, seconded by Martin, to approve the Wetland Replacement Plan and 1
restoration/monitoring plan for 1755 Tamarack Drive after-the-fact replacement as 2
presented by staff. Motion passed unanimously. 3
4
VIII. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (7:21 p.m.) 5
Johnson noted the upcoming fall business tours which will take place in October or 6
November. He stated that Celebration Day will be held on September 16th at Hamel 7
Legion Park and Fun Fest/West Suburban Fire Street Dance will be held September 9th 8
in Loretto. 9
10
IX. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (7:22 p.m.) 11
Martin provided a brief update on the recent meetings of the future fire services group 12
and the input of legislators that were in attendance. She noted that a task force was 13
created and provided input on the participation of Orono in the meetings noting that 14
Orono is not a part of the task force. 15
16
Cavanaugh asked and received confirmation that only residents that would be served 17
within the fire district would be taxed for such services, should such district be created. 18
19
X. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (7:30 p.m.) 20
Moved by Martin, seconded by Cavanaugh, to approve the bills, order check numbers 21
054716-054771 for $167,649.88, EFT 006984E-006984E for $124,447.52, and payroll 22
EFT 0512933-0512992 for $134,668.17. Motion passed unanimously. 23
24
XI. ADJOURN 25
Moved by DesLauriers, seconded by Albers, to adjourn the meeting at 7:31 p.m. Motion 26
passed unanimously. 27
28
29
__________________________________ 30
Kathleen Martin, Mayor 31
Attest: 32
33
____________________________________ 34
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk 35
Resolution No. 2023-
September 19, 2023
Member ______ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-
BEING A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DECERTIFICATION OF TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-9 OF THE CITY OF MEDINA.
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2004, the City of Medina (the "City") created its Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1-9, (the "District") within its Development District No. 1 (the "Project"); and
WHEREAS, on February 1, 2024, all tax increment obligations to which tax increment from
the District have been pledged will be paid in full; and
WHEREAS, the City desires by this resolution to cause the decertification of the District
after which all property taxes generated by property within the District will be distributed in the same
manner as all other property taxes.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Medina that
the City's staff shall take such action as is necessary to cause the County Auditor of Hennepin County
to decertify and to no longer remit tax increment from the District to the City for taxes payable in
2024.
Dated: September 19, 2023.
__________________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _____
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. (Seal)
Agenda Item #5A
Ordinance No. ### 1
DATE
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO. ###
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SCHOOL LAKE NATURE PRESERVE
CONSERVATION DESIGN-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
PERTAINING TO LOT 2, BLOCK 3, SCHOOL LAKE NATURE PRESERVE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF MEDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The School Lake Nature Preserve Conservation Design-Planned Unit
Development (CD-PUD) district established on October 17, 2017 through Ordinance No. 618 is
amended as described herein. Such amendment shall only pertain to Lot 2, Block 3, School Lake
Nature Preserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “Replatted Property”), which is proposed to
be replatted as Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot A, School Lake Nature Preserve 3rd Addition, Hennepin
County, Minnesota.
Section 2. Lot Location, Area, and Dimensional Requirements. The lot area, width,
depth and location of the Replatted Property shall conform with the School Lake Nature Preserve
3rd Addition preliminary plat received by the City dated 1/11/2023 which is attached hereto as
Exhibit A.
Section 3. Yard Setbacks and Performance Standards. All standards of the Medina
City Code and the Rural Residential zoning district shall apply unless explicitly amended in
Ordinance No. 618 or explicitly addressed in the CD-PUD, Conservation Design-Planned Unit
Development zoning district. The following setback and performance standards were established
within Ordinance No. 618 for the School Lake Nature Preserve CD-PUD and are hereby
reaffirmed and remain in full force and effect:
Minimum front yard setback: 40 feet
Minimum setback from exterior of PUD: 50 feet
Minimum side yard setback, between lots within the PUD: 20 feet
Minimum rear yard setbacks: 40 feet
Minimum setback from Parkview Drive: 300 feet
Minimum setback from School Lake: 200 feet
Section 4. Allowed Uses. The permitted, conditional, and accessory uses upon the
Replatted Property shall be those described within the Rural Residential (RR) zoning district,
except as modified herein. Outlot A shall not constitute a separately buildable lot but shall be
owned by a property owner within the School Lake Nature Preserve CD-PUD and used for uses
accessory to the principal use of the property owned in common. No commercial use shall be
permitted upon Outlot A. The two existing structures (screened porch and storage shed) shall be
permitted as an accessory use.
Agenda Item #5B
Ordinance No. ### 2
DATE
Section 5. A copy of this Ordinance and the updated map shall be kept on file at the
Medina City Hall.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication and
recording of the plat of School Lake Nature Preserve 3rd Addition.
Adopted by the Medina City Council this ____day of ______, 2023.
CITY OF MEDINA
By:
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
By:
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
Published in the Crow River News on this ____ day of _____, 2023.
Ordinance No. ### 3
DATE
EXHIBIT A
Amended General Plan of Development for the Replatted Property
Resolution No. 2023-##
DATE
Member ________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-##
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF
ORDINANCE NO. ### BY TITLE AND SUMMARY
WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ###, an
ordinance amending the School Lake Nature Preserve Conservation Design-Planned Unit
Development District pertaining to Lot 2, Block 3, School Lake Nature Preserve; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statues § 412.191, subdivision 4 allows publications by title and
summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and
WHEREAS, the ordinance is three pages in length and contains a map; and
WHEREAS, the city council believes that the following summary would clearly inform
the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina
that the city clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. ### to be published in the
official newspaper in lieu of the ordinance in its entirety:
Public Notice
The city council of the City of Medina has adopted Ordinance No. ##, an ordinance amending the
School Lake Nature Preserve Conservation Design-Planned Unit Development District (CD-
PUD) pertaining to Lot 2, Block 3, School Lake Nature Preserve. The ordinance establishes
requirements for a proposed Outlot which is proposed to be divided from the parcel at 2600
Parkview Drive such that the Outlot may be owned in common by any owner within the School
Lake Nature Preserve CD-PUD district.
The full text of the ordinance is available from the city clerk at Medina city hall during regular
business hours.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the city council of the City of Medina that the city
clerk keep a copy of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post
a full copy of the ordinance in a public place within the city.
Agenda Item #5C
Resolution No. 2023-## 2
DATE
Dated: .
______________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member ________
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2023-##
DATE
Member ______ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-##
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL APPROVAL OF THE
SCHOOL LAKE NATURE PRESERVE 3RD ADDITION PLAT
WHEREAS, the city of Medina (the “City”) is a municipal corporation, organized and
existing under the laws of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, School Lake Nature Preserve, LLC (the “Owner”) owns property located at
2600 Parkview Drive (the “Property”), which is legally described as:
Lot 2, Block 3 and Outlot G, School Lake Nature Preserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota;
and
WHEREAS, the Owner has requested both preliminary and final approval to subdivide
the Property into one lot and two outlots as School Lake Nature Preserve 3rd Addition; and
WHEREAS, the planning commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the
preliminary plat on June 13, 2023, reviewed the information provided by the Owner and City staff,
heard testimony from interested parties, and unanimously recommended approval of the
preliminary plat; and
WHEREAS, following the aforementioned public hearing, City staff directed the Owner
to update the final plat to make lawfully required revisions and provide all title work required for
city attorney review so that both preliminary and final plat could be considered by the city council
concurrently, which was deemed appropriate under the circumstances; and
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2023, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. ________,
amending the School Lake Nature Preserve Conservation Design-Planned Unit Development
District, which establishes land use controls pertaining to the Property, to accommodate the
proposed plat; and
WHEREAS, the City Council also reviewed the proposed plat on September 20, 2023,
during which it also reviewed and considered the aforementioned recommendation of the planning
commission and comments from City staff; and
WHEREAS, subject to the fulfillment of the conditions noted below, the city council
makes the following findings of fact in regard to the preliminary plat based on the requirements
of the City’s subdivision ordinance:
a. The proposed preliminary plat is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and is not
premature for consideration.
b. The subdivision is appropriate for the physical conditions on the site including the
topography, storm water, natural resources, and soils.
Agenda Item #5D
Resolution No. 2023-## 2
DATE
c. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density and the proposed lots meet
minimum lot size standards.
d. The proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage.
e. The proposed subdivision is not likely to be injurious to public health.
f. The proposed subdivision and its improvements will not conflict with public or private
streets, easements, or rights-of-way.
WHEREAS, upon review of the preliminary and final plat the city council finds that,
subject to certain terms and conditions, the plat is consistent with the requirements of the City’s
subdivision regulations, and the requirements, terms and conditions of the amended CD-PUD
district.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Medina, Minnesota
hereby grants preliminary and final plat approval for School Lake Nature Preserve 3rd Addition,
subject to the following terms and conditions:
1. The Applicant shall record documentation in a form and of substance acceptable to the
City Attorney related to the ownership and uses of Outlot A.
2. The Owner shall submit any amendments to HOA covenants for review and approval of
the City.
3. The Owner shall execute and record easement agreement(s) or instrument(s) in a form
and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney to ensure access for the lot and outlots at
time of recording the plat.
4. The plat shall dedicate drainage and utility easements in locations recommended by the
City Engineer.
5. The Owner shall update the plat to properly identify all existing drainage and utility
easements which were previously dedicated upon the Property.
6. The Owner shall take necessary actions, to the extent required by the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District, to amend the Conservation Easement recorded against the Property
in light of the plat.
7. The Owner shall address the comments of the City Attorney plat opinion dated
September 12, 2023 and abide by the requirements of the City Attorney related to title
issues and recording procedures.
8. The City shall reserve the right to review and approve any changes resulting from
approval of the plat by the Hennepin County Surveyor.
9. The plat shall be filed within one year of the date of the city council resolution granting
approval or the approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for time
extension is submitted by the Owner and approved by the City Council.
10. The Owner shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for
the cost of reviewing the amended Planned Unit Development, plat, and other relevant
documents.
Resolution No. 2023-## 3
DATE
Dated: .
By: ______________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
By: ___________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
__________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Erin Barnhart, Finance Director
DATE: September 14, 2023
SUBJ: General Obligation Improvement Bond, Series 2023A
Background
In 2022, during the CIP review, it was determined that bonding would be beneficial for the funding of road
projects to not deplete the road fund balance. Planning proceeded to include assessed road projects from 2022
and 2023.
2022 Road Projects
Arrowhead/OSI
Iroquois Dr. Overlay
Oakview Rd. Overlay
Tower Drive West Overlay
2023 Road Projects
Foxberry Farms Overlay
Medina Highland Overlay
Meadowwoods Trail
Cheyenne Trail
Pinto Drive Overlay
Clydesdale Trail Rehabilitation
Council Action Needed
Approve resolution for issuance and sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2023A
Agenda Item #7A
Resolution No. 2023-
September 19, 2023
1
Extract of Minutes of Meeting
of the City Council of the
City of Medina, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Medina,
Minnesota, was duly held in City Hall in said City on Tuesday, September 19, 2023, commencing at 7:00 p.m.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
* * * * * * * * *
Resolution No. 2023-
September 19, 2023
2
Member ________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption.
CITY Of MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-________
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF GENERAL
OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2023A, IN THE PROPOSED
AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $2,215,000
BE IT RESOLVED By the City Council of the City of Medina, Minnesota (the “City”), as follows:
Section 1. Authorization.
(a) Certain assessable public improvements within the City (the “Improvements”)
have been made, duly ordered or contracts let for the construction thereof pursuant to the provisions
of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475, as amended (the “Act”).
(b) The City Council finds it necessary and expedient to the sound financial
management of the City to issue its General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2023A (the
“Bonds”), in the proposed aggregate principal amount of $2,215,000, pursuant to the Act, to
provide financing for the Improvements.
(b) The City is authorized by Section 475.60, subdivision 2(9) of the Act to negotiate
the sale of the Bonds, it being determined that the City has retained an independent municipal
advisor in connection with such sale. The actions of the City staff and the City’s municipal advisor
in negotiating the sale of the Bonds are ratified and confirmed in all respects.
Section 2. Sale of Bonds. To provide funds to finance the Improvements, the City will
therefore issue and sell the Bonds in the proposed aggregate principal amount of $2,215,000. The principal
amount of the Bonds is subject to adjustment in accordance with the official Terms of Proposal to be
prepared in connection with the offering and the sale of the Bonds.
Section 3. Authority of Municipal Advisor. Ehlers and Associates, Inc. (the “Municipal
Advisor”) is authorized and directed to negotiate the sale of the Bonds. The City Council will meet on
Tuesday, October 17, 2023, or another date selected by City staff, to consider proposals on the Bonds and take
any other appropriate action with respect to the Bonds.
Section 4. Authority of Bond Counsel. The law firm of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered, as
bond counsel for the City (“Bond Counsel”), is authorized to act as bond counsel and to assist in the
preparation and review of necessary documents, certificates and instruments relating to the Bonds. The
officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized to assist Bond Counsel in the preparation
of such documents, certificates, and instruments.
Section 5. Covenants. In the resolution awarding the sale of the Bonds, the City Council will
set forth the covenants and undertakings required by the Act.
Section 6. Official Statement. In connection with the sale of the Bonds, the officers or
employees of the City are authorized and directed to cooperate with the Municipal Advisor and participate
Resolution No. 2023-
September 19, 2023
3
in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to deliver it on behalf of the City upon its
completion.
Section 7. Reimbursement. The City has or may have incurred certain expenditures with
respect to the Improvements that were financed temporarily from other sources but are expected to be
reimbursed with proceeds of the Bonds. The City hereby declares its intent to reimburse certain costs of
the Improvements from proceeds of the Bonds (the “Declaration”). This Declaration is intended to
constitute a declaration of official intent for purposes of the Section 1.150-2 of the Treasury Regulations
promulgated under the Code.
Dated: September 19, 2023.
______________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
_________________________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member _______
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
And the following voted against same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Resolution No. 2023-
September 19, 2023
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS.
)
CITY OF MEDINA )
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Clerk of the City of Medina, Minnesota (the
“City”), do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of
a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held on September 19, 2023, with the original minutes on
file in my office and the extract is a full, true and correct copy of the minutes insofar as they relate to the
City’s General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2023A, in the proposed aggregate principal amount
of $2,215,000.
WITNESS My hand officially as such City Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this ____ day
of September, 2023.
Caitlyn Walker - City Clerk
City of Medina, Minnesota
(SEAL)
Tree Preservation Page 1 of 8 September 19, 2023
Regulations City Council Meeting
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: September 14, 2023
MEETING: September 19, 2023 City Council Meeting
SUBJECT: Tree Preservation Regulations
Background
The City’s Tree Preservation ordinance regulates the removal of trees for construction and
development activities. The ordinance was adopted in 2006. City Council members and staff
discussed reviewing aspects of the tree preservation regulations during review of recent land use
applications.
Summary of Existing Regulations
The current regulations require replacement of trees if more than a certain percentage of the total
trees are removed. The allowed amount is based upon the size of the lot, with more removal
allowed on smaller lots. The ordinance allows a certain percentage to be removed for “initial site
development” (essentially streets and utilities in a development), and a certain amount to be
removed for all other activities:
Initial Site Development Activities other than Initial Site
Development
Total property area included in the
land use application or served by
improvements
Allowed percent
of Significant
Trees that may be
removed
Lot Size
Allowed percent
of Significant
Trees that may be
removed
0.1-1.0 acre 15% 0.1-1.0 acre 20%
1.1-5.0 acres 15% 1.1-5.0 acres 15%
5.1-10.0 acres 10% 5.1-10.0 acres 15%
10.1-20.0 acres 10% 10.1-20.0 acres 10%
20+ acres 10% 20+ acres 5%
The table is a bit difficult to translate without context, but in most common developments, total
removal allowed without replacement is usually 25%-30%.
If removal is in excess of these amounts, replacement is required on an inch:inch basis. A tree
with a diameter of 18”, for example, would need to be replaced with six 3” trees or nine 2” trees.
Medina’s regulations do not differentiate by land use, which is fairly common in other
communities.
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item #7B
Tree Preservation Page 2 of 8 September 19, 2023
Regulations City Council Meeting
The ordinance only applies to “Significant Trees” which are defined as: “a healthy, deciduous
Tree, measuring eight (8) inches in Diameter or greater, or a healthy coniferous Tree, measuring
four (4) inches or greater in Diameter.”
The ordinance allows removal of two significant trees from a parcel per year without a permit,
and includes the following exemptions:
(a) removal of invasive species of Trees (as defined by the Minnesota Department of Nature
Resources) and the control of pioneering Tree species such as box elder when needed to
manage other ecosystems and where the removal will not cause erosion or damage to
riparian areas;
(b) commercially-zoned properties which follow the zoning-specific requirements;
(c) removal of a Tree that has been determined by a Forestry Specialist to be diseased;
(d) removal of Trees in connection with an emergency that poses an immediate danger to life
or property;
(e) removal of Trees that are located in areas in the Three Rivers Park District-managed Morris
T. Baker Park and the Department of Natural Resources-managed Wolsfeld Woods
Scientific and Natural Areas;
(f) removal of Trees that are significantly damaged by storms or natural disasters; or
(g) removal of Trees within an existing Conservation Easement which is consistent with an
existing private management plan.
Comparison to other Communities
Staff reviewed tree preservation regulations in other communities as background information.
Following is a table summarizing the requirements:
Two out of thirteen communities do not have specific tree preservation regulations for all
development. Chaska regulates removal only along bluffs/steep slopes. Corcoran does not
regulate tree removal in standard zoning but encourages during consideration of PUDs.
Allowed Removal
(Residential)
Allowed Removal
(Commercial)Replacement Notes
Medina 25%-30% 25%-30%1 inch: 1 inch
Plymouth 50%75%1.25 inch:inch $125/inch
Maple Grove 50%70-80%2 inch:1inch Only applies in higher value wooded area
Victoria 20%20%1 inch:1 inch
replacement limited to 40 trees per acre;
Replacement credit for saved woodlands
Chanhassen Varies (see below) Varies (see below)Minimum canopy 1 tree = 1089 s.f. canopy (40 trees per acre)
Minnetrista 30%30%1 inch: 1 inch
Dayton 40%60%1 inch: 1 inch
Lake Elmo 30%30%.25-.5 inch : inch .25 for boxelder, cottonwood, ash
Eagan 40%48%1-6 trees:tree
4" replacmenet trees are tree:tree;
softwood are 1/2 replacement
Woodbury 30%30%.5 inch: 1 inch 1/8":1 for 'common'; 1/4":1" for evergreen
Shorewood None None 2-3 trees/tree Limited to 8 trees/acre
Chaska Not regulated Not regulated Only Bluff/steep slope removal regulated
Corcoran Not regulated Not regulated Preservation encourged through PUD
Tree Preservation Page 3 of 8 September 19, 2023
Regulations City Council Meeting
Medina’s removal allowance is on the more stringent side of the comparisons. One community
has a lower allowed removal percentage but has a limit on the amount of replacement which can
be required (40 trees per acre). Three communities have limitation of 30%, but two of those
communities have a lower replacement amount (0.5” per 1”).
Maple Grove’s regulations only apply to woodlands identified in their natural resource
inventory. Removal of trees scattered through a site or along tree lines would not be regulated.
Chanhassen’s regulations (attached for reference) are unique amongst the communities. The
regulations account for the “baseline canopy” of a site and different land uses. Their regulations
establish a minimum amount of the site which is required to be tree canopy, which is adjusted
based on how wooded the site is to begin with, and what land use is planned. A site with few
trees, for example, may end up having to plant more trees than a development site which is
partially wooded but which preserves trees. Staff believes it may be worth discussing whether
Medina’s ordinance should consider existing tree coverage and land use as factors.
Recommended Changes
Administering the tree preservation ordinance over the past 16 years, staff has identified the
following potential changes to be discussed. Staff presented these changes to the Planning
Commission, and the consensus was that these changes were appropriate.
Add language related to off-site planting or contribution to forest management fund
In several developments, the amount of required tree replacement was too high to sustainably
and practically plant on a subject site. The City’s practice has been to either allow planting in
off-site locations within the City, or to accept a contribution to the City’s forest
management/reforestation fund equivalent to the planting.
The ordinance does not describe this allowance, so staff recommends that a provision be added
to describe this practice. Language can be found on the top of page 8 of the ordinance.
Exemption: Trees within public right-of-way or easement by public agency
The primary strategy of the tree preservation ordinance is to encourage design which avoids as
many trees as possible, not necessarily as a penalty for removing trees. In the case of street
expansions and utility projects, the ability for public agencies to avoid trees is limited by the
location of existing improvements and easements. As such, staff believes it is reasonable to
exempt removal by public agencies. Recommended language can be found on the bottom of
page 4 of the ordinance [Subd. 5(h)].
Exemption: Removal for improvements to existing public streets
The City often requires construction of turn lanes on existing public streets adjacent to a
development. Similar to the rationale for exempting removal by public agencies, staff believes it
is reasonable to consider exempting trees which a developer would need to remove along the
outside of a development site to add turn lanes to an existing street. It would not likely be
practical to design improvements to avoid the trees. Recommended language can be found on
the bottom of page 4 of the ordinance [Subd. 5(i)].
Tree Preservation Page 4 of 8 September 19, 2023
Regulations City Council Meeting
Planted Trees
The existing regulations references “credit for previously planted trees” [see Subd. 9(c)(vi)].
The current language suggests that previously planted trees can be considered as replacement
trees if replacement is required in a project.
The thought behind this type of provision is so there is not a disincentive for property owners
planting trees in the years and decades prior to development or a construction project.
Staff believes it may be reasonable and more straight-forward to exempt trees planted by the
owner from consideration on the front end, rather than counting as replacement on the back end.
Staff has suggested this language at the bottom of page 7, top of page 8.
Replacement for Old Growth Forest
The current Tree Preservation ordinance states that replacement for trees removed from an Old
Growth Forest Remnant is required to be on a 2 inch:1inch basis. The ordinance notes that Old
Growth Forest Remnants are identified within the City’s natural resource inventory. The City’s
2008 Inventory does not include sufficient detail to specifically identify Old Growth Forest
remnants, although Wolsfeld Woods is known as Old Growth at the very least. There may be
other remnants.
One of the communities which was surveyed for comparison (Victoria) requires 2:1 replacement
for “heritage trees,” so there is one example of a community which has a multiplier for
replacement. In their case it is for older, larger trees.
While the City could attempt to spend additional efforts to identify whether there are other
remnants within the City, or remnants could be identified at the time of a tree survey on a
specific site, staff believes other tools would be more effective to preserve these areas rather than
relying on the tree preservation ordinance. Examples include land planning, acquisition, or
requiring dedication of the land as park dedication. Staff has some concern about requiring a
multiplier in terms of replacement. Staff has suggested language to remove this multiplier [See
Subd. 9(c)(i) on page 7]
Remove Ash Trees from Allowed Species
With the emergence of Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) in the area, staff recommends removing ash
trees from the list of allowed replacements. The ordinance does require diversification for
replacement trees (no more than 25% of one species), which is best practice to limit impacts
from future tree diseases and infestations.
Additional Changes Recommended by the Planning Commission
Standards by Land Use – Uptown Hamel
The City’s current removal allowances are based on lot size, irrespective of planned land use.
Several communities which were reviewed by staff established different regulations for allowed
removal based on land use. Staff believes it may be advisable to consider regulations by land
use. The Uptown Hamel district, for example, is intended to allow a more “urban” or
Tree Preservation Page 5 of 8 September 19, 2023
Regulations City Council Meeting
“downtown” style of development, has a lot of smaller lots and allows 90% coverage by
buildings and parking. It likely is difficult to develop in this style while also preserving trees.
Most sites do not have stands of trees to preserve, but they are instead scattered through the site.
Staff believes it is appropriate to address this in the tree preservation ordinance.
In the past, the City has accounted for land use differences through the “waiver” procedures
which are described within the existing regulations. The waiver procedure is described on the
bottom of page 5. The City has granted waivers in the case of land planned for more intensive
uses, provided the applicant made efforts to preserve trees.
The City Attorney recommends that, to the extent possible, the City should try to specify
expectations for removal within the ordinance, rather than commonly relying on waivers to
address such instances.
The Planning Commission discussed whether it was appropriate to consider differing removal
allowances for different land uses. The consensus of the Commission was that it seemed
reasonable to regulate tree removal in Uptown Hamel differently because the objectives for this
area in the Comprehensive Plan were unique amongst land uses in the City.
Staff has recommended language which would require replacement on a ratio of 2 trees per
removed tree in Uptown Hamel. Rather than establishing a different replacement calculation for
Uptown Hamel, the ordinance could establish a different removal allowance. For example, since
hardcover is permitted over 90% of a lot in Uptown Hamel, perhaps a higher removal allowance
could be established. Alternatively, generally language similar to “Site Plans shall preserve
existing trees to the extent practicable.”
Staff believed a replacement per tree alternative may be the best alternative in Uptown Hamel to
support replanting of some shade trees while still accounting for the more intensive development
pattern in Uptown Hamel. This language can be found in Subd. 9 (c)(vii) on the bottom of page
8.
Ash/Elm/Box Elder removal/replacement
Several communities required a lower replacement amount for softwood trees such as box elder,
cottonwood, and ash. The City’s current regulations include a provision that can exempt
“removal of invasive species of Trees (as defined by the Minnesota Department of Nature
Resources) and the control of pioneering Tree species such as box elder when needed to manage
other ecosystems and where the removal will not cause erosion or damage to riparian areas.”
Staff believes the original intent of this provision was for cases of tree/forest management, not as
an exemption for removal of such trees during development. Nonetheless, relying on this
language and the allowance of the waiver provision of the code, the City has reduced
replacement requirements in several cases for lower quality trees such as cottonwood and box
elder. If that is to be the practice, staff would recommend formalizing either the exemption or
reduction in replacement for such trees.
The Planning Commission discussed at the August meeting and generally agreed that a different
standard was appropriate.
Tree Preservation Page 6 of 8 September 19, 2023
Regulations City Council Meeting
Several other communities address this issue by requiring half as much replacement for certain
trees. Staff has suggested language which would lower the replacement requirement for trees
such as Box Elder, Cottonwood, Willow, Aspen, and Poplar to ½. Staff has also added language
for discussion which would lower the replacement for disease/insect susceptible trees (Ash and
Elm) to tree:per:tree rather than inch:inch.
There was some discussion during the Council update at the 8/15 meeting whether it was
appropriate to encourage removal and replacement of Ash trees because of Emerald Ash Borer.
Staff believes a low replacement requirement may provide such an encouragement.
Draft language is included in Subd. 9(c)(i) on page 7.
The Council may wish to discuss the following options on this subject:
• Replacement ratio – the ½ ratio was suggested partially because it is a standard found in
other communities. This amount could be adjusted or the “categories” be adjusted.
• # of Tree:Tree – staff suggested a tree:tree replacement for Ash/Elm trees partly as a way
to generate discussion. These trees could be assigned a replacement ratio instead of
tree:tree as well. Similarly, trees such as Box Elder could be dealt with irrespective of
size (for example, require 2-4 replacement trees per Box Elder).
• Maximum Replacement per Tree – a “hybrid” approach could also be considered whereas
replacement of certain trees could be calculated on an inch:inch basis, but, the
replacement for each tree capped at a certain amount. For example, a 32” cottonwood
tree could be limited to replacement of 4 trees.
While there are many ways to approach different types of trees and situations, it should be noted
that each different standard adds a level of complexity for both the applicant’s team and the City
review.
The Planning Commission discussed and believed the adjustment to the replacement
requirements recommended by staff seemed appropriate. Commissioners raised concerns with
additional complexity of multiple calculations and submittal requirements. Staff noted that the
ordinance already requires tree surveys to identify species and size, so classifying the trees and
quantifying differently should not be much more difficult.
Other Topics
Staff has identified several topics for additional discussion by the Planning Commission and
Council for other potential changes. The Planning Commission discussed and did not believe it
was necessary to make these changes to the regulations.
Allowed Removal
As noted above, Medina is one of the more stringent communities with regard to tree removal
allowances. Medina is also unique in how removal for “initial site development” is accounted
for separately from “other activities.” For commercial or multi-family sites which do not have
public streets, this two-part approach can actually result in a more restrictive allowance because
Tree Preservation Page 7 of 8 September 19, 2023
Regulations City Council Meeting
a project may need to remove more trees for a larger building/parking footprint rather than for
streets.
The Planning Commission discussed and the consensus was that, with some adjustments to the
Uptown Hamel district, the standards were appropriate to address the objectives of the City.
PUD as incentive for preservation
The Planned Unit Development (PUD) ordinance identifies the following as one of the purposes
of the City considering a PUD: “The preservation, enhancement, or restoration of desirable site
characteristics such as high quality natural resources, wooded areas, wetlands, natural
topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion.” Staff believes this
language is sufficient for the City to provide flexibility for a developer to design a site to
preserve wooded areas. Because the City has the discretion in determining whether to approve a
PUD, the Planning Commission and Council will need to balance the tree preservation goals
against other interests which may be raised by residents (minimum lot size, unit count, type of
dwelling, etc.). The PUD can be a good tool, but the developer would need to realize sufficient
value from the flexibility granted to make the project more desirable for them as well.
The Planning Commission believed existing language was sufficient to encourage preservation
through a PUD.
Density Bonuses/Transfer of Development Rights
Maple Grove’s ordinance includes language which allow a property owner to transfer
development rights from wooded acreage to other sites and allows the City to grant density
bonuses for preserving wooded areas.
The PUD process provides some ability to “transfer” density from one portion of a site to
another, at the discretion of the City. Density would need to be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan, which does allow +20% density “for developments that protect the natural
features or exceed other standards of the zoning district.” Staff believes it is fair to interpret that
the existing PUD ordinance would allow this +20% density at the discretion of the City for
woodland preservation. If the Planning Commission and City Council wanted to emphasize this
incentive, it may be advisable to add the language more explicitly in either the Tree Preservation
ordinance or the PUD ordinance.
While the PUD ordinance would certainly allow flexibility in lot size and layout to shift the
location of buildings within a development site, the City does not explicitly address transfer of
development rights BETWEEN sites. Such transfers are often suggested conceptually in studies
as a tool to preserve desirable features, but are not widely utilized. Transfers may be challenging
to administer and track over time. Maple Grove has had this option in their regulations for a
number of decades of extensive development, and was utilized only a few times. Density
bonuses were utilized much more often.
The City likely could regulate a transfer of development rights through a PUD process (even for
non-contiguous sites) if the opportunity ever presented itself. However, the likelihood is much
lower if the option is not explicitly described in code.
Tree Preservation Page 8 of 8 September 19, 2023
Regulations City Council Meeting
Staff seeks feedback on whether bonus density language should be emphasized in code, or if
transfer of development rights language should be added.
The Planning Commission believed that the Comprehensive Plan and PUD language was
sufficient to allow for density bonuses if deemed appropriate by the City. The Commission did
believe in crafting regulations to allow a transfer of development rights was likely overly
complicated, and if there was ever was an opportunity, the City could likely address through a
PUD process.
Park Dedication credit
The City can require 10% of buildable land from any subdivision to be dedicated to the City for
Parks, Trails, and Open Space. This provides a fairly powerful tool to preserve the highest
priority wooded areas. Requiring dedication of wooded areas would compete with requiring
dedication of lands for active recreation (parks/trails) or obtaining cash-in-lieu of dedication.
The City would also then obtain property rights over the wooded area.
Several communities note that the City would provide some credit toward park dedication
requirements if wooded areas are preserved within a development site. Staff believes there may
be an opportunity to provide credit for preserved woodland areas. If such lands were preserved,
but not open to the public, partial park dedication credit could be considered.
The Planning Commission did not recommend adding specific language, and noted that the City
could already utilize Park Dedication without additional language.
Planning Commission Recommendation/Potential Action
The Planning Commission discussed the ordinance at the August and September meetings.
Excerpts from this discussion is attached for refence, and the Planning Commission
recommendations were reference throughout this report. Following discussion, the Planning
Commission unanimously recommended approval.
Staff seeks feedback and direction from the City Council on the subjects discussed above. There
is not necessarily a required timeframe for adoption of amendments. If the City Council needs
additional information or discussion, the ordinance can be continued to future meetings.
Once the City Council has completed review, the following action can be taken:
Motion to direct staff to present the ordinance related to Tree Preservation for action at
the following consent agenda [with the following recommended changes, if any].
Attachments
1. Ordinance
2. Excerpt from 8/8/2023 Planning Commission minutes
3. Excerpt from draft 9/12/2023 Planning Commission minutes
4. Chanhassen regulations
Ordinance No. ### 1
DATE
CITY OF MEDINA
ORDINANCE NO. ###
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE CITY CODE
PERTAINING TO TREE PRESERVATION AND REPLACEMENT
The City Council of the City of Medina ordains as follows:
SECTION I. Section 828.41 of the code of ordinances of the City of Medina is amended by adding
the underlined language and deleting the struck through language as follows:
Section 828.41. Tree Preservation and Replacement.
Subd. 1. Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to promote, within the city,
development that retains Medina’s rural character, in which the natural environment is
the dominant feature. Trees and landscaping are a major component of the natural
environment, and the city recognizes that preservation and replanting of trees is important
in order to maintain a healthy and desirable community. The city further recognizes that
a certain amount of tree loss is an inevitable consequence of the development process, but
that the reforestation of this valuable renewable resource will ultimately provide a long-
term environmental and economic benefit.
Subd. 2. Function. The function of this ordinance includes but is not limited to:
(a) improving air quality;
(b) reducing noise pollution;
(c) improving water quality;
(d) preventing of soil erosion;
(e) conserving energy by providing natural insulation and shading;
(f) reducing the urban heat island effect;
(g) increasing property values by establishing tree buffers that provide privacy
protection between conflicting land uses;
(h) providing habitat for wildlife, including birds that help control insects;
(i) enhancing the city’s physical and aesthetic environment; and
(j) enhancing the quality of life and the general welfare of residents.
Subd. 3. Definitions. The following words and terms, wherever they occur in this
ordinance, are defined as follows:
(a) “Best Management Practices” (“BMP”) are the Erosion and sediment control
practices as well as conservation or Low Impact Development principles related
to Tree preservation and removal, that are the most effective and practicable for
controlling, preventing and minimizing negative impacts on existing Trees,
minimizing soil exposure and protecting tracts of Woodland and Old Growth
Forest Remnants.
(b) “Crown Cover” is the protective canopy created by the overlapping leafy heads of
Ordinance No. ### 2
DATE
Trees that shelters the habitat beneath it.
(c) “Development Site” is the surveyed parcel, or site, including those improvements
that occur on-site or adjacent to the Development Site or spoil site locations. A
Development Site includes both the Primary and Secondary Construction Zones.
(d) “Diameter” is the width of a Tree’s trunk, measured at four (4) feet above the
ground.
(e) “Dripline” is the farthest distance away from the trunk of a Tree that rain, or dew,
will fall directly to the ground from the leaves or branches of the Tree to the roots.
(f) “Forestry Specialist” is a person certified in urban forestry functions and
management, who has been retained by the city, or an applicant.
(g) “Initial Site Development” is the grading and construction of streets, trails, and
sidewalks; the installation of utilities, including water, sanitary sewer, storm
sewer, natural gas, electric, and cable television; or the grading and construction
of drainage ways and storm detention areas.
(h) “Lost Trees” are Significant Trees in areas to be preserved but that die as a result of
construction or Development Site improvement activities and must be replaced at
the same ratio as Significant Trees. Such Trees shall be considered Lost Trees
when they die as a result of:
(i) grade change or land alteration, whether temporary or permanent, of greater
than one (1) foot, measured vertically and affecting forty (40) percent, or
more, of the Tree’s root zone (the area under a Tree that is at and within
the Dripline of the Tree);
(ii) secondary construction activities that result cutting forty (40) percent, or
more, of the Tree’s root zone (the area under a Tree that is at and within
the Dripline of the Tree);
(iii) mechanical injury to the trunk of a Significant Tree, causing the loss of thirty
(30) percent, or more, of the bark at a specific part of the Tree; or
(iv) compaction to ninety (90) percent of a depth of six (6) inches, or more, of
forty (40) percent, or more, of the Tree’s root zone (the area under a Tree
that is at and within the Dripline of the Tree).
(i) “Low Impact Development” or “LID” means multi-functional site design,
streetscapes and architecture that maintains and restores vital terrestrial ecological
processes necessary to protect the ecological integrity of the land.
(j) “Natural Resources Inventory” is a document developed by the city that denotes
where regionally significant natural resources are located within the city.
Ordinance No. ### 3
DATE
(k) “Principal Structure” means any building or structure on the property in which the
main use of the property takes place.
(l) “Private Road” means a privately owned (or controlled) and maintained drive, street,
road, lane, or any improved or unimproved surface, not dedicated to a
governmental entity as a public road, which provides the primary means of
vehicular ingress and egress from a public road to two or more dwelling units,
lots, parcels or principal buildings, whether created by a private right-of way,
easement, or other device.
(m) “Old Growth Forest Remnant” is a natural forest remnant that is one acre or greater,
that has developed over a long period of time, generally around 100 years, with
young, middle-aged and old Trees present. It is dominated by shade tolerant
species, such as sugar maple and basswood. All Old Growth Forest Remnants are
identified in the city’s current Natural Resource Inventory or in the current
Natural Areas and Community ID Numbers map which are available at city hall.
(n) “Replacement Trees” are Trees that replace removed Significant Trees.
(o) “Significant Tree” is a healthy, deciduous Tree, measuring eight (8) inches in
Diameter or greater, or a healthy coniferous Tree, measuring four (4) inches or
greater in Diameter.
(p) “Subdivision” means the separation of an area, parcel, or tract of land under single
ownership into two or more parcels, tracts, lots, or long-term leasehold interests
where the creation of the leasehold interest necessitates the creation of streets,
roads, or alleys, for residential, commercial, industrial, or other use or any
combination thereof, except those separations: (1) where all the resulting parcels,
tracts, lots, or interests will be 20 acres or larger in size and 500 feet in width for
residential uses and five acres or larger in size for commercial and industrial uses;
(2) creating cemetery lots; (3) resulting from court orders, or the adjustment of a
lot line by the relocation of a common boundary.
(q) “Tree” is a woody plant, which at maturity, is thirteen (13) feet or greater in height
and that has a more or less defined crown.
(r) “Tree Preservation and Replacement Plan” is a certified survey, which shows the
location and species of all Trees to be preserved, removed, or disturbed, and the
location of Replacement Trees within the site.
(s) “WCA” means the “Wetland Conservation Act,” Minnesota Statutes Sections
103G.222-.2373.
(t) “Woodland” is a group of Significant Trees and understory plants that are one (1)
acre or greater in size and non-species specific, with a Crown Cover of fifty (50)
percent or greater. Old Growth Forest Remnants are a species-specific type of
Woodland.
Ordinance No. ### 4
DATE
Subd. 4. Applicability. This ordinance shall apply to any of the following circumstances:
(a) removal of more than two (2) Significant Trees on any property, developed or
undeveloped, within a given calendar year, except as exempted by subdivision 5
of this section.
(b) any formal land use application to the city that is to be zoned residential, including,
but not limited to, Subdivisions, minor Subdivisions, site plans, rezoning and
conditional use permits;
(c) site improvements requiring a building, grading, driveway, sign or WCA permit; or
(d) redevelopment of a legal non-conforming Principal Structure.
Subd. 5. Exemptions. The following activities are exempt from the requirements of this
ordinance:
(a) removal of invasive species of Trees (as defined by the Minnesota Department of
Nature Natural Resources), noxious trees such as buckthorn, and the control of
pioneering Tree species such as box elder when needed to manage other
ecosystems and where the removal will not cause erosion or damage to riparian
areas;
(b) commercially-zoned properties which follow the zoning-specific requirements;
(c) removal of a Tree that has been determined by a Forestry Specialist to be diseased;
(d) removal of Trees in connection with an emergency that poses an immediate danger
to life or property;
(e) removal of Trees that are located in areas in the Three Rivers Park District-managed
Morris T. Baker Park and the Department of Natural Resources-managed
Wolsfeld Woods Scientific and Natural Areas;
(f) removal of Trees that are significantly damaged by storms or natural disasters; or
(g) removal of Trees within an existing Conservation Easement which is consistent with
an existing private management plan.
(h) Removal of Trees by a public agency upon public land, right-of-way, or easement for
the installation of public improvements.
(g)(i) Removal of Trees related to improvements to existing public roadways adjacent
to a development site or extension of utilities to a development site which are
required by the City as a condition of land use application approval.
Formatted: List Paragraph, No bullets or numbering,Widow/Orphan control
Formatted: List Paragraph, No bullets or numbering,Widow/Orphan control
Ordinance No. ### 5
DATE
Subd. 6. Allowed Tree Removal.
(a) The following amount of Significant Trees may be removed from a site and
replacement shall not be required.
Initial Site Development Activities other than Initial Site
Development
Total property area included in the
land use application or served by
improvements
Allowed percent
of Significant
Trees that may be
removed
Lot Size
Allowed percent
of Significant
Trees that may be
removed
0.1-1.0 acre 15% 0.1-1.0 acre 20%
1.1-5.0 acres 15% 1.1-5.0 acres 15%
5.1-10.0 acres 10% 5.1-10.0 acres 15%
10.1-20.0 acres 10% 10.1-20.0 acres 10%
20+ acres 10% 20+ acres 5%
(b) For activities that include the Subdivision of property or dedication of public or private
right-of-way, the allowed number of Significant Trees that may be removed for Initial
Site Development shall be based on the lot size prior to Subdivision. After the
property is subdivided, the allowed number of Significant Trees that may be removed
shall be based on the individual lot sizes within the Subdivision.
Subd. 7. Waiver. A waiver, of the number of Trees required to be replaced, may be
granted by the city council, in its full and absolute discretion, on a case-by-case basis for
circumstances where the applicant has exhausted all reasonable design options for the
Development Site. An applicant shall be eligible for a waiver only if he or she
implements all Best Management Practices listed in Subdivision 8 of this ordinance.
Waivers associated with a land use application shall be considered by the city council at
time of the review of the application and shall not be considered after this review is
approved.
Subd. 8. Standards Governing Tree Preservation, Protection and Planting. The
following Best Management Practices shall be used for those Development Sites that
utilize conservation easements that protect Old Growth Forest Remnants or Development
Sites that are requesting waivers from certain requirements of this section:
(a) Realignment of proposed streets and utilities in order to avoid Tree removal;
(b) Reduction of required street width and increase of street grade up to an eight (8)
percent slope by the city when the applicant can demonstrate that these changes
result in Tree preservation;
Ordinance No. ### 6
DATE
(c) The use of Private Roads in lieu of public streets;
(d) Variation in street radius and speed design;
(e) Modified grading plans;
(f) Flexible lot lines;
(g) Alternative utility configurations, such as the use of ejector pumps, force mains, or
revised home elevations to minimize grading;
(h) The use of flexible development standards, such as clustering of homes, in order to
preserve Old Growth Forest Remnants, Significant Trees and open space;
(i) The preservation of unique and rare Tree species or communities identified in the
Natural Resource Inventory; and
(j) The use of Low Impact Development principles.
Subd. 9. Tree Preservation and Replacement Requirements. For all activities that are
subject to this section, a Tree Preservation Plan must be submitted by the applicant for
review and approval by the city. To the extend extent possible, Significant Trees and
Trees located within Old Growth Forest Remnants, Woodlands and natural habitat areas
shall be preserved. The Tree Preservation Plan shall include the following information:
(a) Tree Inventory. The Tree inventory shall identify Significant Trees on the property.
It shall include:
(i) The location of and a list of all Significant Trees by species. In cases involving
large stands of Trees, an applicant may, with city staff review and consent,
show the area on the site plan and use a representative sample in order to
calculate the number and species of Significant Trees. The list shall be
provided in table and electronic spreadsheet format and shall quantify
Significant Trees by the following categories:
A. Disease/Insect Susceptible Trees (Ash and Elm).
B. Common Trees (Aspen, Box Elder, Cottonwood, Poplar, and Willow).
C. Coniferous Trees.
D. Hardwood Trees (Basswood, Birch, Catalpa, Cherry, Hackberry, Hickory,
Ironwood, Locust, Maple, Oak, and Walnut).
(ii) Significant Trees that are proposed to be removed. They shall be marked
with an “X” on the site plan. The Diameter of each removed Significant
Tree, in inches, shall also be noted.
(iii) Identification of areas within Old Growth Remnant Forests, as defined by
the Natural Resources Inventory. If an applicant wishes to adjust the area
Ordinance No. ### 7
DATE
based on fieldwork, city staff must review and approve of any adjustment.
(iv) A list of any ecologically unique and/or significant areas on the
Development Site that are identified in the Natural Resources Inventory
report.
(b) Identification of the locations of any protective fencing and any other measures that
will be taken to preserve the Trees. Protective fencing must be placed at least one
foot beyond the Dripline of all Trees to be preserved. Any Trees lost as a result of
construction activity will be counted when determining the amount of Trees that
were removed, which may cause additional Replacement Trees to be required.
(c) Tree Replacement Plan. If the proposed removal of Significant Trees exceeds that
allowed by subdivision 6 of this section, Tree Replacement will be required and a
Tree Replacement Plan will need to be submitted to the city for review and
approval by the city council. The Tree Replacement Plan shall be certified by a
Forestry Specialist. It shall contain the following information for each
Replacement Tree.
(i) (i) Number and Size of Trees to be Replaced. For Significant Trees located
within an Old Growth Forest Remnant or other significant area identified by the
Natural Resources Inventory, a Tree Replacement ratio of a Diameter of two (2)
caliper inches per one (1) inch of removed Significant Trees and Lost Trees is
required. For all other areas containing Significant Trees, a Tree Replacement
ratio of a Diameter of one (1) caliper inch per one (1) inch of removed Significant
Trees and Lost Trees is required. Required Replacement shall be provided as
follows:
A. Disease/Insect Susceptible Trees (Ash and Elm) shall be replaced at a ratio of at
least one (1) Replacement Tree per one (1) Significant Tree removed.
B. Common Trees (Aspen, Box Elder, Cottonwood, Poplar, and Willow) shall be
replaced at a ratio of one-half (½) inch Replacement Tree per one (1) inch of
removed Significant Tree.
C. Coniferous Trees shall be replaced at a ratio of one (1) inch Replacement Tree per
one (1) inch of Significant Tree removed.
D. Hardwood Trees (Basswood, Birch, Catalpa, Cherry, Hackberry, Hickory,
Ironwood, Locust, Maple, Oak, and Walnut) shall be replaced at a ratio of one (1)
inch Replacement Tree per one (1) inch of Significant Tree removed.
(ii) Type of Replacement Trees. All Replacement Trees shall be native trees as
defined by subdivision 10 of this section. All Replacement Trees shall be
appropriate for the soil conditions found at the planting site. All
Replacement Trees shall be from certified nursery stock and shall not be
bare root stock. If more than twelve (12) Replacement Trees are required
on a Development Site, there shall be no more than twenty-five (25)
percent of the same species.
(iii) Minimum Size of Replacement Trees. All deciduous Replacement Trees
Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt
Formatted: Indent: Left: 1", No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt
Formatted: List Paragraph, Numbered + Level: 2 +Numbering Style: A, B, C, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment:Left + Aligned at: 0.75" + Indent at: 1"
Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt
Formatted: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt
Ordinance No. ### 8
DATE
shall be a Diameter of at least two (2) caliper inches in size. All
coniferous Replacement Trees shall be at least four (4) feet in height,
which shall be equivalent to two (2) replacement inches.
(iv) Placement of the Replacement Trees. All Replacement Trees shall be
planted within the Development Site, in a non-patterned arrangement,
duplicating natural conditions whenever possible. Replacement Trees
may be planted in an alternative location if that location is approved by the
city council.
(v) Survival of Replacement Trees. All Replacement Trees must survive for at
least two growing seasons from the date of planting before the city will
refund the financial guarantee required by subdivision 13 of this section. In
the event that a Replacement Tree dies or has severely declined (25% of
crown has died) before the two growing seasons have passed, it shall be
replaced with a Tree of the same caliper inch size. The new Tree must
survive for two growing seasons from the date of its planting before the city
will refund the financial guarantee.
(vi) Credit for Previously Planted Trees. Trees which have been previously planted
by the current property owner shall be exempt from the Replacement
requirements of this section. Such Trees shall be excluded from the total
number of Trees when calculating the allowed Removal and Replacement
requirements. An applicant may, if they have previously planted Trees on
the property while the property was under their ownership, receive credit
for these Trees as part of the Replacement Plan. The Trees must meet the
requirements of Replacement Trees stated above. The applicant must
produce proof, acceptable to the city, that the planting of the trees occurred
under the applicant’s ownership of the property. Credit for each previously
planted Tree shall be granted based on the minimum size Replacement Tree
allowed under this ordinance, unless the applicant is able to provide proof
as to the size of the Tree at the time of planting.
(vii) Replacement Trees in Uptown Hamel. Notwithstanding anything herein to
the contrary, if Replacement Trees are required within the Uptown Hamel
zoning district, they shall be provided at a ratio of two (2) Replacement
Trees per Significant Tree removed, except Disease/Insect susceptible trees
(Ash/Elm) shall be provided at a ratio of one (1) Replacement Tree per
Significant Tree removed.
(d) Off-site Replacement; Contribution to City Environmental Fund. If required Tree
Replacement is not practicable on the subject site because, in the City’s
discretion, insufficient space exists to plant the Replacement Trees, an applicant
may propose to plant in other locations in the City. Alternatively, an applicant
may contribute an amount described in the City’s fee schedule to the City’s
Environmental Fund for the purpose of forest management. The contribution
shall be based upon the estimated cost equivalent to planting the required amount
Ordinance No. ### 9
DATE
of Replacement Trees.
(e) Amendments. A Tree Preservation or Replacement Plan may need to be amended
after it has been approved by the city council. Requests for amendments shall be
submitted to the Zoning Administrator prior to the issuance of the Tree
Replacement permit. The city’s Zoning Administrator shall have the authority to
approve minor amendments. Request for amendments after the Tree Replacement
Permit has been issued shall be considered by the City Council.
Subd. 10. Native Trees. The following is the list of Trees that are native to Minnesota for
purposes of this section as specified by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’
“Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota, the Eastern Broadleaf
Forest Province.”:
(a) Ash, Black (Fraxinus nigra) RESERVED
(b) Ash, Green (Fraxinus Pennsylvanica) RESERVED
(c) Ash, White (Fraxinus Americana) RESERVED
(d) Aspen, bigtooth (also called largetooth aspen, poplar, popple)(Populus
grandidentata);
(e) Aspen, quaking (also called trembling aspen, poplar,
popple)(Populus tremuloides);
(f) Basswood, American (Tilia Americana);
(g) Birch, paper (Betula papyrifera);
(h) Birch, river (Betula nigra);
(i) Birch, yellow (Betula alleghaniensis);
(j) Butternut (Juglans cinerea);
(k) Cedar, northern white (Thuja occidentalis);
(l) Cherry, black (Prunus serotina);
(m) Cherry pin (Prunus pensylvanica);
(n) Elm, American (only Dutch Elm Disease resistant cultivars) (Ulmus
Americana);
(o) Fir, balsam (Abies balsamea);
(p) Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis);
(q) Hophornbeam, eastern (also called ironwood) (Ostrya virginiana);
(r) Hickory, bitternut (Carya cordiformis);
(s) Hickory, shagbark (Carya ovata);
(t) Honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos);
(u) Hornbeam, American (also called blue beech)(Carpinus caroliniana);
(v) Maple, black (Acer nigrum);
(w) Maple, red (Acer rubrum);
(x) Maple, silver (Acer saccharinum);
(y) Maple, sugar (Acer saccharum);
(z) Mulberry, red (Morus rubra);
(aa) Oak, black (Quercus velutina);
(bb) Oak, bur (Quercus macrocarpa);
(cc) Oak, northern red (Quercus rubra);
(dd) Oak, northern pin (also called Hill oak)(Quercus ellipsoidalis);
Ordinance No. ### 10
DATE
(ee) Oak, swamp white (Quercus bicolor);
(ff) Oak, white (Quercus alba);
(gg) Pine, eastern white (Pinus strobes);
(hh) Pine, jack (Pinus banksiana);
(ii) Pine, red (also called Norway pine)(Pinus resinosa);
(jj) Spruce, black (Picea mariana);
(kk) Spruce, white (Picea glauca);
(ll) Tamarack (also called eastern or American larch) (Larix laricina); and
(mm) Walnut, black (Juglans nigra).
(nn) Willow, Black (Salix nigra)
(oo) Willow, Peachleaf (Salix amygdaloides)
(pp) Willow, Heartleaf (Salix eriocephala)
Subd. 11. Permit Required. Any activity regulated by this section shall require the
applicant to obtain a Tree Preservation permit from the city. The application shall
include a Tree Preservation and Replacement Plan (if required) for the Development Site.
The application shall also include payment of a permit fee which shall be set by ordinance
by the city council from time to time.
Subd. 12. Financial Guarantee for Tree Replacement. In the event that Tree
Replacement is required, the applicant shall submit a financial guarantee, in a form
acceptable to the city at the time of obtaining the Tree Replacement Permit. The
financial guarantee must be for at least two growing seasons in order to ensure both the
planting and the survival of the Replacement Trees. If no Replacement Trees are
required, the City may require a financial guarantee that will ensure that in the event that
any existing Significant Trees are damaged or killed at time of development, they will be
replaced by Replacement Trees. No financial guarantee shall be required when there are
no Significant Trees on the property.
Subd. 13. Violations. It shall be a violation of this section for any person, firm or
corporation, to destroy the number of Significant Trees beyond the limits established by this
section. The Zoning Administrator shall determine non-compliance with this section,
subject to review by the city council. The destruction or partial destruction of any
Significant Trees in violation of this section shall be considered a violation and may result in
revocation of the Tree Replacement permit or an action against the financial guarantees.
Subd. 14. Penalties. Any person convicted of violating this section shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and shall be subject to a fine or imprisonment as specified by state statute.
Such penalty may be imposed in addition to an action against the financial securities,
suspension or revocation of the Tree Replacement permit.
Ordinance No. ### 11
DATE
SECTION II. The City’s fee schedule is hereby amended by adding the following fee:
Contribution in-lieu of planting Replacement Trees $100 per caliper inch
SECTION III. This ordinance shall become effective upon its adoption and publication.
Adopted by the Medina city council this _____ day of _______, 2023.
_____________________________
Kathleen Martin, Mayor
Attest:
_________________________
Caitlyn Walker, City Clerk
Published in the Crow River News on the ______ day of _____________, 2023.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 8/8/2023 Minutes
1
Public Hearing–Ordinance Amendment–Chapter 8 of the City Code Related to Tree
Preservation
Finke stated that the existing regulations were summarized within the report, noting the two-tier removal
allowance. He stated that most developments fall within 25 to 30 percent allowed tree removal. He
stated that staff reviewed the regulations of neighboring communities for comparison and noted that it
seems common to have inch per inch replacement required. He commented that Medina is on the lower
end of the allowance noting that a number of communities have discounted the lower value trees. He
stated that Medina has a waiver provision for portions of replacement and noted that provision has been
used in cases where there are a lot of lower value trees. He stated that the City Attorney has suggested
that process be more formalized rather than following the waiver provision. He noted that there were
some outliers when reviewing other communities, such as Corcoran which does not have a tree
preservation ordinance and Chanhassen which established a minimum canopy amount. He provided
details on an appeals court case related to tree replacement requirements.
Jacob asked if there is an inspection of trees to ensure the replacement is followed.
Finke explained the inspection process that is followed to ensure the trees are planted and survive the
two-year warranty period.
Jacob asked if the ordinance only applies to new construction or whether it would apply to a homeowner
that chose to clear cut their property they have been living in for a number of years.
Finke replied that the ordinance does cover all properties. He noted that two trees can be removed
without application of the ordinance, but any additional removal would need a permit. He stated that the
permitting for the property would then be tracked to ensure a property does not go over the removal
threshold.
Popp referenced some definitions, such as old growth terminology and asked if that is discretion based or
an actual definition.
Finke stated that old growth forest remnant is a defined forestry term from the state/DNR and therefore he
would not suggest adjusting that definition.
Popp commented that he would guess that mature trees are declining and therefore there may not be a lot
of trees exceeding 100 years in age.
Finke stated that it is not just the age but the multi-age diversification.
Jacob asked about trees that are poorly sited on a property.
Finke commented that there is an exemption for trees that would be a hazard.
Nielsen asked if there is a project on the horizon that is leading toward prompting these changes, as
sometimes ordinance changes are reactive.
Finke replied that there is not such a project and explained that there have been previous experiences in
development that have suggested that it would make sense for the City to review the ordinance. He
commented that the thought behind the policy is not to punish people for removing trees, but that the
ordinance should incentivize a design that is least impactful to trees. He stated that the ordinance does
not prohibit tree removal, it simply requires replacement and/or payment at a certain threshold. He
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 8/8/2023 Minutes
2
reviewed the recommended changes that would formalize past practices such as allowing off-site
replacement of trees and/or a contribution to the City’s environmental fund for forest management, and
the public agency exemption for tree removal within the right-of-way.
Nielsen asked if other cities require tree replacement for right-of-way removal.
Finke replied that he could look into that. He noted that while the City would replant trees where
appropriate, he would also not want to require tree calculations along a road corridor and payment by the
City to the City’s own fund, essentially transferring funds from the road fund to the environmental fund.
He reviewed the next proposed change which would exempt tree removal on the boundary of a property
that becomes right-of-way to support a road improvement such as a turn lane. He stated that there is
language within the existing ordinance that would allow planted trees to be claimed as credit for tree
replacement that may be required, and staff would suggest changing that to allow planted trees to be
exempt as they do not want to disincentivize people from planting trees on their property.
Rhem commented that he is confused by that concept and asked for additional clarification.
Finke replied that it is supposed to work in the manner that trees planted would count towards
replacement but could also be counted as a denominator in the calculation. He explained that the City has
not enforced it in that manner. He reviewed different scenarios with the Commission and how the
exemption would apply.
Nielsen asked how someone would prove the number of trees that they planted.
Jacob asked how trees that voluntarily grow would be counted.
Finke stated that would be part of the discussion process. He used the example of Marsh Point which was
a farm field in the 1980s and additional trees were planted for landscaping, which led to volunteer trees
that became significant. He stated that in that case they exempted the landscaped trees as part of the PUD
process.
Rhem asked how often the planted tree provision has been used.
Finke replied that he is aware of three developments that used that provision.
Rhem commented that this is a very complicated and difficult to enforce provision, no matter how the
language is written.
Finke noted that aerial photos have been used in past scenarios.
Rhem asked if that exemption should be reviewed in its entirety as they review the Code, asking if there is
benefit in having the provision.
Nielsen stated that she reviewed the provision as it is within the Code and it is fairly clear, therefore she is
fine leaving it as is.
Popp commented that he is also okay with how it reads. He stated that he does have concern with the
transfer in ownership and how that would apply.
Nielsen stated that a developer would seem to have trouble selling a development without any trees.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 8/8/2023 Minutes
3
Finke stated that staff suggests removing the old growth forest provision as it would seem not to apply to
Medina.
Popp commented that if it is not relevant today, it would most likely not be relevant in the future.
Jacob commented that he would think there is less deforestation and more forestation, therefore it may
become more applicable in 50 years.
Finke commented that he would think there would be better tools in place should an old growth area come
to fruition in order to protect it, rather than requiring two to one replacement of removed areas.
Popp agreed that would make sense.
Finke stated that staff suggests removing ash trees from the allowed trees to be planted.
Popp asked the type of process that would allow that species to reenter the list.
Finke stated that staff would track it and if an EAB resistant ash tree is developed, it could come back
similar to elms. He noted that those are the changes as proposed and the remainder are simply items for
discussion. He noted that the City is on the lower end of allowed removal compared to other cities and
asked for confirmation that is where the City would like to be. He did not think there had been discussion
about changing those percentages and simply wanted to point out where the City falls compared to others.
Rhem commented that he believes the two-tiered system is probably overly complex compared to other
cities. He stated that he is fine with where the City is compared to the other cities but thinks the two-
tiered system could be simplified to make it easier for applicants and staff.
Finke confirmed that there is comfort from the Commission with the percentages but perhaps that could
be calculated in a simplified manner. He provided density bonus incentives used by other communities,
specifically Maple Grove, which actually allows a transfer. He noted that ability to transfer would be
almost impossible in Medina because of the land of land available. He stated that staff could use the
density bonus under the current PUD process.
Rhem commented that he would be comfortable leaving the process as is, using the PUD process for
density bonus consideration.
Finke noted that if someone owned two sites, one with a lot of trees and one without trees, he would think
the density transfer could still be considered through the PUD process.
Plec noted that if the language is not specifically within the ordinance, a developer may not propose such
a situation.
Finke confirmed the consensus of the Commission to leave that language as it is. He noted that most
cities differentiate between types of development, such as commercial and residential, whereas Medina
does not. He provided an example of areas within Uptown Hamel that have large, landscaped trees that
would have had significant impact on commercial development.
Rhem commented that example would be inconsistent with what they are attempting to achieve in
Uptown Hamel.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from 8/8/2023 Minutes
4
Popp agreed that would challenge the vision for Uptown Hamel but was uncertain he would want to
extend the change beyond that area.
Jacob commented that there are some large silver maples on adjacent residential properties, and he would
not want to see those cut down and replaced with two-inch trees. He noted that perhaps park dedication
could be used to assist in preserving those trees.
Finke confirmed the consensus of the Commission to lessen the replacement requirements in Uptown
Hamel. He moved to the topic of park dedication noting that is a tool that could be used for tree
preservation and provided suggestions of how that could potentially be used.
Nielsen commented that using park dedication would seem to make things more complicated.
Rhem agreed that would make calculations more complicated.
Finke discussed the concept of reducing the replacement requirement of certain species such as boxelders
and other less desirables. He noted that previously adjustments for large quantities of those species has
been done through waiver.
Nielsen confirmed that she would support a lesser replacement for those types of trees.
Finke asked if inch per inch replacement also makes sense for the trees.
Jacob noted that they would need to consider future growth for certain trees, over density to ensure long
term health and success.
Finke used the example of another community that requires two trees to be planted for each tree removed.
He referenced the scenario where a large tree is removed and using inch per inch replacement, that would
result in many small trees being planted. He stated that he understands the concept but perhaps a cap is
placed on the number of trees needed to replace a large tree to ensure they do not have that overcrowding.
Jacob stated that he would support the concept of a cap.
Popp commented that he would have a hard time commenting on that as he does not necessarily have that
forestry expertise.
Finke commented that ultimately a site cannot be designed to avoid all the trees, therefore this would be
designed to recommend the number of replacement trees and/or amount that would need to be paid into
the environmental fund.
Nielsen commented that she would be uncomfortable placing a cap on replacement trees.
Finke agreed that may not be needed, especially if they are going to reduce the replacement required for
boxelders and the other less desirables.
Rhem opened the public hearing at 8:10 p.m.
No comments.
Rhem noted that the public hearing will be continued at the following meeting.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 9/12/2023 Minutes
1
Public Hearing–Ordinance Amendment – Chapter 8 of the City Code Related to Tree Preservation
Rhem noted that this is a continuation of the public hearing from the last meeting.
Finke stated that the draft resolution includes the changes as discussed at the last meeting and provided a
brief summary of those changes. He stated that the ordinance as proposed also adjusts the replacement
ratios for Uptown Hamel and provided a summary as well as additional options that could be considered
for that area. He stated that there was additional discussion related to less desirable trees and reviewed
proposed regulation on how those trees could be addressed within the ordinance. He also provided
examples used by other communities.
Rhem commented that the layers of complexity would seem to go against the intent to simplify the
ordinance. He commented that as drafted it would seem relatively burdensome. He acknowledged that it
would make sense to incentivize removal of diseased trees, or low value trees, rather than high value
trees, but the process seems burdensome.
Finke stated that the survey would already be completed, and the intent would be to require that
information to be provided on an electronic spreadsheet to make calculations and changes easier. He
noted that staff is already doing the work on the fly without these guides.
Jacob noted that ultimately you need to consider what you want the lot to look like in terms of the canopy.
Finke noted that the City avoids the situation of overplanting and in those situations where trees would
not be viable if replanted in the required numbers through payment to the reforestation fund.
Ahmed used the Meander Boardwalk site as an example and asked how this would apply to a certain area.
Finke replied that area is not being purchased and therefore would not be touched as part of that project.
He commented that in that type of scenario where trees are out of the way, removal of those trees would
be more likely to be avoided as a result of the regulations.
Rhem commented that he is comfortable with the changes but asked if it could be simplified, although he
did not have a suggestion on how that could be done.
Nielsen commented that while she does not disagree, staff is in charge of enacting these regulations and
therefore feels comfortable if staff is proposing that type of calculation. She liked the idea of requiring
the electronic spreadsheet.
Finke asked and received confirmation that the Commission supports the language as presented related to
ash and elm trees.
Rhem asked the type of impact that would have on the reforestation fund, as that fund could be used to
mitigate ash trees.
Nielsen asked if staff is comfortable with the language as drafted, as staff would be implementing the
regulations.
Finke stated that in terms of implementing, he is not concerned. He stated that idea of the impact on the
reforestation fund is a good point as that would be a significant reduction. He recognized that while the
payment into the fund for a large diseased tree is helpful, there should also be consideration that the tree
would ultimately need to come down at some time in the future at a cost as well.
Medina Planning Commission Excerpt from Draft 9/12/2023 Minutes
2
Rhem noted that the Council could have additional discussions about the impact to the reforestation fund.
Motion by Nielsen, seconded by Rhem, to recommend approval with the additional requirement that the
tree survey be submitted as an electronic spreadsheet. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Piper, Plec,
and Popp)
Rhem closed the public hearing at 8:04 p.m.
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
S R
T
U
V* $)'**W'$"X)++Y Z =7<[ 77? >@<9@<:[<\5<=9=7 9 D8@A<:]'$^'10'.' _6 K; >`a@5`8>G] &.#)1**#% (.'&#) a 5`;<>>Gb",&'()(#,$' c7 5`d 7DE9e" $*"))++Y f `[ 77? >@<9@<:V )*"&"),&'/$' f6@8cE5`<G<g ."&'(#,$' c@>56[h@?<>g ."&'+'+^$#i $' c@>56[= =<>]'.'&+')+ *#1)' j8>96<>DJ 9 7= k#(l,1/#&1/' m@D`K8k& %#.)#'.$#'*'(.W1)#( $X#)n)++Ya8D<G785E:9[968>D7<::O 77? >@<9@<:k^X(1*&'%")%#1#*") J8FF<<9><<[o<D9E5`Gp#&#')++Y q@DA<D[ 77? >@<9@<:r&X"))++Y 4qZ[s4sO><:@:9 D9? >@<9@<:T
t
V* $,#(('&'u Z =7<[vCE>VX &'(*W# $)++Y _<>?@5<;<>>G8>wED<;<>>G]$'.' ,"))++Y a B968>D[ 77? >@<9@<:x'&"))++Y J> ; ==7<[ ::8>9<AF78B<>@DKOy >@<9@<:z).$^'0#$,#(#'(' {>8DB88A|1+"&").$ X"&1#% ) v:=<D}1$/"))++Y v:6[Z8ED9 @D[ 77? >@<9@<:|W &&1% (%$1('X"$ () vCE>J8>`9><<|$"(")* $')#i $'~ €+1$.~ 7EC j<B=8>9
!"#$% &' !( )
*
+,- + &'./012'/ ,3
*
4 (25((!$ 6789:;<=>
? @ A($(>
@ &!2B
C
%(((2.
12(0
* 12D'
* E 12A(2.F $
* !G$ (!
E !!H$(
!(0
!D'
3 )
!12 2' E* ?I
@ J"($K-L
E
G/M (K-L
E
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
!"
!"
#$%&'
(
&')*+
+
,
+
+
- &
. .
-
/
+
+
0
+
(
. .
12
!"/
,
,
,
!
(
-&!
13
+
4
%
+
5
(
! " !#$%"#& ' ( ) '*+' ,
- . /012003401563701863901:63263
,
;
; 9/3 983 903 273203<
:83 :03 983 903283=
703 :83 :03 983903>
883 743 :83 :03983>
4/3 843 7:3 :83983?
@
=
@-
A
B
C
B
B
D
@
B
E
F
G29H
E
@
I
E
J2D
20/6B
B
K9E
G
HK:A
90
:0
K7L
9MF
2MF
K8,
@
K
!!" ## " "$
%&'
(
)
*+,-
".(
/
-
/
$
*#, 0
/ 12
$
3
4
$
$
0
2
/ / /
/
5
6
7 58
$
/
)
9
-
4
:
/
/
$
: /
7 58
$
$
;.
/
4
*(,
/
/
$
$
'
)
$
$
$
/
%
/
7
/
/
$
$
/
$
$
)
0
$
!""
#
$
%
&
'
()
* *
+&
&
,%
)-$
&
./
0
0 1
2
3
4
5
6
4
7"+,
&
./*
'
*
8
7"8
43!!*)9.*.:*+:;437:!9.77*<*,7;43."<997.:*,*,<;43.<"9((*.<*,:;43.:"97<*+*,;43.::97(*..*,;43!.<97,(*,*"7;43!(+97:*.<*"<;43!,:9:*,*":;43<7"9+7*.!*";43<!.9,*.:*";43<:+997=!,*.<*"(;43:,:99!=::*7.*7<;43<797:*7!*7,2
=>
9."*77(
$% &4?@ABCDECEFGHIEJKKLMDNOPPOPQPR
Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 September 19, 2023
City Council Meeting
TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director
DATE: September 14, 2023
MEETING: September 19, 2023 City Council
SUBJECT: Planning Department Updates
Land Use Application Review
A) School Lake Nature Preserve 3rd Addition and PUD Amendment – School Lake Nature
Preserve LLC has requested to separate the area of the formal garden from one of the lots within
the development. The garden area is proposed as a stand alone outlot. The Planning
Commission reviewed at their June 13 meeting and unanimously recommended approval. The
Council reviewed on July 5 and directed staff to prepare approval documents, after the applicant
has provided updates to the plat. Staff intends to present at the September 19 meeting.
B) Meander Park and Boardwalk – Meander Rd, east of Arrowhead Dr – Medina Ventures had
requested PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat approval for a development to include four
residential units north of Meander Rd, and commercial uses south of Meander Rd including a
venue, restaurant, daycare, and speculative retail space. The City Council granted amended
PUD and Final Plat approval at the April 18 meeting. The applicant has submitted an
amendment to the plat and plans which would add a strip of property along the east of the
property, increase the size of the daycare, add parking, and proposes solar panel “carports” over
much of the parking lot. Staff is reviewing information and will present if complete, potentially
at the October 10 Planning Commission meeting.
C) 500 Hamel Road Apartment Concept Plan – Medina Apartments LLC has requested review of
a concept plan review for development of a 97-unit apartment building at 500 Hamel Rd. The
Planning Commission and Council provided comments in the fall of 2022. The developer held a
series of neighborhood workshops with neighboring property owners, and intends to meet again
on September 21, 2023.
D) 1225 Maplewood Concept Plan – John and Lisa James have requested review of a concept plan
for a three-lot subdivision. Staff is conducting preliminary review and will schedule for a public
hearing when complete.
E) Preserve of Medina (fka Blooming Meadows) – east of Holy Name Dr, north of CR24 – Tim
Boser has requested PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat approval for a 5-lot rural
subdivision. The applicant proposes to restore a large area of wetlands and create a wetland
bank in addition to the lots. The City Council granted general plan of development and
preliminary plat approval on August 2. Staff will await final plat application.
F) Cates Industrial Park – Comprehensive Plan Amendment– Oppidan has requested final plat
approval for a 310,000 square foot warehouse/office development east of Willow Drive, north of
Chippewa Road. Staff has been informed that the acquisition may not be proceeding. Staff is
investigating to determine what action, if any, is necessary with pending applications.
G) Grossman Septic Variance – 3082 Highway 55 – Jaymes Grossman has requested a variance
for the setback for a septic system from wetlands to replace an existing system. The Council
approved the variance at the August 15 meeting and the project will now be closed.
H) BAPS Site Plan Review – 1400 Hamel Road – BAPS Minneapolis Medina has requested an
amendment to their approved site plan review. The Council approved the amended Site Plan
MEMORANDUM
Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 September 19, 2023
City Council Meeting
Review at the December 6, 2022 meeting. The applicant has indicated that they may potentially
begin construction during the spring of 2024.
I) Hamel Townhomes Final Plat – 342 Hamel Rd – Hamel Townhomes, LLC has requested final
plat approval for a 30-unit townhome development. The Council granted final plat approval on
August 16. Staff will work with the applicant to finalize documents prior to beginning of
construction.
J) Ditter Heating and Cooling Site Plan Review – 820 Tower Drive – Ditter Heating and Cooling
has requested a Site Plan Review for an approximately 5,000 square foot addition to its building.
The application is incomplete for review and will be scheduled for a hearing when complete.
K) Pioneer Trail Preserve – This project has been preliminarily approved and the City is awaiting
final plat application.
Other Projects
A) Morningside/Maplewood ravine and pond – staff has been coordinating with Minnehaha Creek
Watershed staff related to grant funds for the project. Staff will present a Memorandum of
Understanding related to the project at the September 5 meeting. WSB staff is also proceeding
with modeling and feasibility report.
B) Tree Preservation Ordinance – staff presented the Tree Preservation Ordinance to the Planning
Commission for preliminary discussion. The Planning Commission provided recommendations
at their September 12 meeting and staff intends to present to Council on September 19.
C) City Hall cell phone/back up internet improvement – staff met with our new cell phone service
provider (FirstNet/AT&T) related to poor cell phone service at City Hall. Back-up internet at
City Hall will also be provided via cellular service. FirstNet is providing options for an
antennae booster at City Hall which will help with AT&T service at City Hall, including our
backup cellular service. Public Works installed the exterior antenna and planning staff ran
interior cabling.
D) Edible Cannabinoid Products Ordinance – City Attorney Anderson prepared a draft ordinance
which would prohibit the sale of the hemp derived edible cannabinoid products (ECPs) prior to
the time sale is licensed by the State of Minnesota under the new cannabis legislation approved
during 2023. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended an ordinance
prohibiting sales. Staff intends to present to Council on October 3.
E) Emerald Ash Borer grants – WSB is preparing grant applications for state funding related to
EAB. Staff has been meeting with WSB and providing background information.
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jason Nelson, Director of Public Safety
DATE: September 14, 2023
RE: Department Updates
Community Service Officer Tanner Wiese has completed all his conditional job offer items and on
September 13th, he turned in his light blue Community Service Officer uniform for his dark blue
Police Officer uniform. He is now Medina’s newest Police Officer. He will be replacing the spot that
was open when Officer Scharf left a few months ago.
We have an active hiring process going right now for both the Police Officer and Community Service
Officer positions. The closing deadline for Community Service Officer was last week and we didn’t
have any applicants. This position has been reposted. The Police Officer position has closed on
September 13th, and we have a handful of applicants that applied. The applications will be reviewed
and scored by HR and interviews will be conducted in the next week or two.
On September 9th, we assisted in providing security and officer presence at the Loretto Fun Fest and
the West Suburban Fire Department Street Dance. The weather was pretty good. We had some light
rain showers before the fireworks display. After the fireworks the sky cleared, and it turned out to be a
beautiful evening. There were between 2000-2500 people that showed and all had a great time. The
event was a great success not only for the City of Loretto but also for the West Suburban Fire
Department.
Auto theft and theft from autos are still occurring all over the metro and we are not immune to this.
This past week officers were notified of an attempt to locate a stolen BWM from Scott County.
Virtual tracking of this vehicle advised it was in the City of Medina. The area was checked and others
in the area were alerted. The vehicle was located by the Plymouth Police Department and when they
attempted to stop a pursuit ensued. The vehicle was successfully stopped, and four occupants were
arrested. They were found to be very young with the youngest being 12 years old. Officers checked
the area of the city and found that they had tampered with autos in Medina, Independence, and many
other cities. This is common throughout the metro and the ages of the youth seem to be getting
younger and younger. From an investigative standpoint, this is a perfect example of why I budgeted
for Flock Cameras in the CIP. In this instance, if this stolen vehicle entered our city past where a
camera was installed, we would have received a real time informational hit of a stolen vehicle entering
our city. This allows officers to be proactive instead of reactive taking theft from auto or auto theft
reports after the fact. Several cities around us have already purchased these cameras. In speaking with
those cities, several private neighborhoods have also purchased these cameras on their own. By using
the same system, it allows police to have access to their private cameras as well and strengthens the
network of cameras within the system. This allows us to track thieves in real time and even follow up
on suspicious vehicles after the fact as it stores data for 30 days. This is a great investigative tool.
Patrol:
The following are updates of Patrol Officers between August 30th, 2023, and September 11th, 2023:
Citations – 20 Warnings – 38 PD Accidents – 2
PI Accidents – 0 Medicals – 12 Falls – 1
Suspicious Calls – 7 Traffic Complaints – 7 Other Agency Assists – 10
Business/Residential Alarm - 5 Welfare Checks - 4 Disturbance Calls - 7
On 08/31/2023 at 1513 hours officers were dispatched to a traffic complaint that was westbound on
Highway 55 from Willow Drive. It was reported a vehicle was all over the road and crossing into the
opposite lane of traffic and nearly striking vehicles head on. Multiple callers reported the same. Near
Lake Sarah Heights Drive two semi-truck drivers forced the vehicle to the shoulder and boxed it in to
keep it from continuing. It was determined that the driver was having a diabetic issue and had
extremely low blood sugar. North Paramedics arrived on scene and treated the driver to get his sugar
levels raised. After some time, the driver became coherent again and refused transport. Paramedics
advised the driver to stop somewhere and eat some food and additional sugar.
On 08/31/2023 at 1944 hours officer stopped a pickup for driving 91 mph on Highway 55 in the 55-
mph zone. Driver said a female had been tailgating him and then attempted to pass him, so he sped
up. The driver was issued a citation for driving more than 20 mph over the posted limit.
On 08/31/2023 officers received notification from surveillance equipment of someone on a property in
the 1100 block of Medina Road that has been the area of numerous burglaries. Officers checking the
area stopped a pickup truck and found a metal gate in the bed of the truck that was believed to have
been stolen from the property. Officers contacted the homeowner who confirmed the gate in the truck
belonged to his property. The driver was arrested for theft and during a search of the vehicle narcotics
were found. While the officer was transporting the suspect back to the Medina Police Department and
was driving by the property from the theft when he observed a second male cross the street with a
flashlight. A perimeter was set up and a K-9 and drone from neighboring agencies assisted. The
second male was later located in the area and also arrested.
On 09/02/2023 a set of valuable mud flaps was located along Medina Road. They were taken back to
the PD for safe keeping. The following day officers located a sign posted in the area of lost mud flaps
with a reward offered. Officers located the property owner and released the mud flaps and refused to
accept the reward. The property owner was grateful.
On 09/05/2023 at 1545 an officer was dispatched to a welfare check in the area of County Road 101
and Clydesdale Trail. It was reported that a family with small children was panhandling on the corner
of this intersection and believed it to be dangerous for the kids. Officer arrived and monitored the
family. They were panhandling from private property and were not causing an issue.
On 09/07/2023 at 1917 hours officers were called to a fall on the pickleball courts. A female had been
playing when she fell backwards onto her back and was in pain and unable to walk. When officers
arrived, they found family had already carried the patient and loaded her into the back seat of one of
their vehicles. North Ambulance arrived and evaluated the patient, and it was decided that the family
would self-transport to the hospital to avoid having to move her again from the back seat where she
was currently comfortable.
On 09/08/2023 at 1907 hours officers were called to a welfare check in the area of Medina Golf &
Country Club. It was reported an elderly Asian female was wandering around the Country Club lot
and that she did not speak English and was last seen walking on Evergreen Road. The area and
surrounding neighborhoods were checked but the female was not located.
On 09/09/2023 the majority of the department assisted with the West Suburban Fire Department Street
dance in Loretto. There were no issues during the event.
On 09/11/2023 at 1809 hours an officer was dispatched to the intersection of Highway 55 and Rolling
Hills Road on an iPhone crash alert notification. While checking the area the officer found an iPhone
in the middle of the road. A short time later a parent of the phone owner arrived and advised they had
received notification that their son was in a crash at that intersection. It was determined that the phone
owner had left their phone on the bumper of a vehicle, and it fell off while driving. The phone was
turned over to the parents.
On 09/12/2023 at 0020 hours an officer stopped a vehicle for driving 79 mph on Highway 55. The
driver showed indications of being under the influence of alcohol and was subsequently arrested for
DWI. The driver later submitted to a DMT test which showed a BAC of .13. The driver was issued a
citation for DWI and released to a sober responsible person.
Investigations:
Wrote a search warrant for a phone seized in relation to a burglary.
Wrote a search warrant for a phone recovered in a stolen vehicle.
Wrote a search warrant for cell phone location data on a theft.
Received a theft report and wrote a subpoena for the case.
Was forwarded a school bus stop arm violation that was sent in for charging.
Received an HRO violation and sent it in for charging.
Investigations currently has 12 open/active cases.
1
TO: Medina Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lisa DeMars, through Public Works Director Steve Scherer
DATE: September 13, 2023
MEETING: September 19, 2023
SUBJECT: Public Works Update
Streets
• The first lift is complete, and curbing was poured yesterday on the Townline Road -
Juniper Curve project. Public Works will backfill and shoulder where necessary prior
to the second lift.
• Roadside ditch mowing was completed late last week.
• Public Works cleaned up some curb work in the Foxberry Farms neighborhood last
week.
Water/Sewer/Stormwater
• The water system has been running smooth over the past few weeks.
• The Willow Drive Lift Station Project is well on its way. We are on schedule for a
late September or early October startup date.
• Fall hydrant flushing and inspections will begin in early October. The process will
take a few weeks, and a notice was included in the newsletter and on our webpage.
Parks/Trails
• The grandstand project at Hamel Legion Park will be completed this month. HAC is
also working on field maintenance, including mound work and new sod.
• Public Works seeded the field at Hunter Park and installed an irrigation system.
• Woodchip paths leading to the popular seating areas at Lakeshore Park were installed
last week. The benches are due to arrive in early October and will be installed. The
kayak rack will be installed soon as well.
• Public Works crack sealed the trail adjacent to Clydesdale Trail ahead of seal coating,
which will be completed on Friday.
• Public Works will help with setup at Celebration Day. We also plan to have a couple
of pieces of equipment on hand for the event.
Other
• Public Works is removing dead and diseased trees in the wooded area known as
“Harriet’s Woods” inside the Enclave development.
MEMORANDUM
2
• Public Works completed a few maintenance tasks including planting grass, mounting
an antenna at city hall, fixing restroom fixtures at the community center, and
replacing a broken emergency light in the PW conference room.
• Volunteers from OSI reached out with interest in participating in World Cleanup Day
and have agreed to collect trash and litter on Clydesdale Trail from Co Rd 116 to Co
Rd 101 on Saturday, September 16.
• Volunteers from Scout Troop 283 will be cleaning storm drain grates in the Foxberry
Farms neighborhood on Sunday, September 17.
ORDER CHECKS SEPTEMBER 5, 2023 – SEPTEMBER 19, 2023
054772 ERIN BARNHART ................................................................... $1,999.98
054773 BHASKAR, VASU ...................................................................... $975.00
054774 BHATI, DEVI .............................................................................. $200.00
054775 CAVANAUGH, JOE, SR. ............................................................. $66.48
054776 EDINA REALTY ........................................................................... $32.39
054777 ELAM, TIMOTHY OR MEGAN .............................................. $10,000.00
054778 FUST, CONNIE.......................................................................... $500.00
054779 GREGORY, OLIVIA ................................................................... $255.00
054780 HANSON BUILDERS, INC .................................................... $20,000.00
054781 JUST FOR KIDS FOUNDATION ................................................ $600.00
054782 KENNEDY & GRAVEN CHARTERED .................................. $10,381.90
054783 KLAERS, JOSHUA .................................................................... $187.85
054784 KUNKEL, BRENDA ................................................................. $1,075.00
054785 LEGACY TITLE ........................................................................... $50.00
054786 MARTIN, SARA .................................................................... $10,000.00
054787 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ................................................. $27,061.65
054788 NALLAMOTHU, JAYARAM ..................................................... $1,000.00
054789 REGIS TITLE LLC ..................................................................... $580.13
054790 TIMESAVER OFFSITE .............................................................. $514.75
054791 TUMKUR NAGARAJU, NAVEENA ............................................ $250.00
054792 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC.................................................... $78,642.00
054793 BEAUDRY OIL & PROPANE .................................................. $4,426.05
054794 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN ................................... $42,685.85
054795 BRAUN, ROBERT .................................................................. $6,500.00
054796 CONTEMPORARY IMAGES ........................................................ $43.11
054797 CORE & MAIN LP ...................................................................... $317.65
054798 ECM PUBLISHERS INC ............................................................ $148.06
054799 EPA AUDIO VISUAL ............................................................... $5,927.00
054800 ESS BROS. & SONS, INC. ..................................................... $2,064.00
054801 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL .................................................... $363.15
054802 HAMEL LUMBER INC ........................................................... $10,186.84
054803 HAMEL LIONS CLUB ............................................................. $2,275.00
054804 HAWKINS INC. ....................................................................... $3,332.58
054805 HENN COUNTY INFO TECH .................................................. $2,407.07
054806 KRAEMER MINING AND MATERIALS ................................. $42,407.01
054807 KUSTOM SIGNALS, INC. .......................................................... $239.00
054808 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES ..................................................... $14.00
054809 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR .................................................. $472.50
054810 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES ......................................... $8,263.00
054811 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT INC .......................................... $51.50
054812 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN ......................................................... $4,913.35
054813 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ................................................. $36,562.86
054814 MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH .................................. $643.00
054815 MINNESOTA TOPSOIL ........................................................ $24,880.00
054816 MN DEPT OF LABOR/INDUSTRY ............................................... $10.00
054817 MN MAYORS ASSOCIATION ...................................................... $30.00
054818 MOTLEY AUTO SERVICE LLC ................................................. $869.50
054819 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC ...................................................... $143.73
054820 NEATON BROTHERS EROSION LLC .................................... $1,830.00
054821 NELSON ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR .................................. $2,100.00
054822 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTION LLC .............................................. $531.74
054823 CITY OF ORONO ................................................................... $8,282.85
054824 PEMBER COMPANIES INC ............................................... $236,299.91
054825 PREMIUM WATERS INC ............................................................. $56.74
054826 SCHERERS PUMPKIN PATCH ................................................. $225.00
054827 SOLUTION BUILDERS INC .................................................... $5,279.40
054828 STREICHER'S ............................................................................. $14.99
054829 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC ........................................ $544.00
054830 SYMBOLARTS .......................................................................... $140.00
054831 STEVEN TALLEN ATTORNEY AT LAW ................................. $5,590.17
054832 TEGRETE CORP ....................................................................... $468.00
054833 TWIN CITY OUTDOOR SERVICES INC ............................... $13,507.69
054834 VACKER INC ............................................................................. $943.00
054835 VALLEY PAVING ................................................................ $610,086.53
054836 VESSCO, INC. ........................................................................... $134.00
054837 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE ................................................ $322.78
Total Checks $1,250,904.74
ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS SEPTEMBER 5, 2023 – SEPTEMBER 19, 2023
006985E FURTHER ................................................................................... $58.50
006986E PR PERA .............................................................................. $21,421.55
006987E PR FED/FICA ....................................................................... $21,279.51
006988E PR MN Deferred Comp ........................................................... $3,967.47
006989E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA .................................................. $4,727.59
006990E CITY OF MEDINA ........................................................................ $25.00
006991E FURTHER .............................................................................. $2,127.39
006992E AFLAC ....................................................................................... $491.08
006993E CENTURYLINK.......................................................................... $251.28
006994E CULLIGAN-METRO ..................................................................... $38.70
006995E FP MAILING SOL POSTAGE BY PHON ................................. $1,000.00
006996E FRONTIER .................................................................................. $57.53
006997E FURTHER ................................................................................. $340.04
006998E MARCO (LEASE) ....................................................................... $855.28
006999E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC ........................................................ $1,085.95
007000E PAYMENT SERVICE NETWORK INC .................................... $1,575.07
007001E THE VALVOLINE COMPANY 68 ............................................... $153.05
007002E XCEL ENERGY ...................................................................... $5,805.64
Total Electronic Checks $65,260.63
PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSITS SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
0512993 WIESE, TANNER L .................................................................... $892.82
0512994 ALBERS, TODD M. .................................................................... $230.87
0512995 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L. ................................................... $1,171.01
0512996 BARNHART, ERIN A. ............................................................. $3,019.12
0512997 BOECKER, KEVIN D. ............................................................. $3,749.95
0512998 CAVANAUGH, JOSEPH ............................................................ $230.87
0512999 CONVERSE, KEITH A. ........................................................... $2,519.87
0513000 DEMARS, LISA ....................................................................... $1,614.86
0513001 DESLAURIERS, DEAN .............................................................. $230.87
0513002 DION, DEBRA A. .................................................................... $2,198.97
0513003 ENDE, JOSEPH...................................................................... $2,121.37
0513004 FINKE, DUSTIN D. ................................................................. $3,122.31
0513005 GLEASON, JOHN M. .............................................................. $1,945.62
0513006 GREGORY, THOMAS ............................................................ $2,823.82
0513007 GROTH, BRENNA L ............................................................... $1,504.52
0513008 HALL, DAVID M. ..................................................................... $2,842.14
0513009 HANSON, JUSTIN .................................................................. $2,502.39
0513010 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. ............................................................ $2,784.01
0513011 KLAERS, ANNE M. ................................................................. $1,769.78
0513012 LEUER, GREGORY J. ............................................................ $2,165.81
0513013 MARTIN, KATHLEEN M ............................................................ $327.07
0513014 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. .................................................. $1,645.00
0513015 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D .......................................................... $2,789.37
0513016 MYHRE, JORDAN J ............................................................... $2,719.25
0513017 NELSON, JASON ................................................................... $3,044.15
0513018 RATKE, TREVOR J ................................................................ $2,405.34
0513019 REID, ROBIN ............................................................................. $230.87
0513020 REINKING, DEREK M ............................................................ $2,458.74
0513021 RUCKE, MARIA ...................................................................... $1,888.39
0513022 SCHEIBE, CONNIE L ............................................................. $1,599.50
0513023 SCHERER, STEVEN T. .......................................................... $2,730.26
0513024 VINCK, JOHN J ...................................................................... $2,636.96
0513025 VOGEL, NICHOLE .................................................................. $1,077.11
0513026 WALKER, CAITLYN M. ........................................................... $2,056.31
0513027 BURSCH, JEFFREY ............................................................... $1,530.41
Total Payroll Direct Deposit $68,579.71