Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout10-10-2023 Planning Commission Packet POSTED AT CITY HALL: October 6, 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2023 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL (2052 County Road 24) 1. Call to Order 2. Changes to Agenda 3. Update from City Council proceedings 4. Representative at next City Council meeting 5. Planning Department Report 6. Public Hearing – Meander Park and Boardwalk – Medina Ventures – 1472 Highway 55 – Amendment to Planned Unit Development and Plat 7. Approval September 12, 2023 Planning Commission Minutes 8. Adjourn Planning Department Update Page 1 of 2 October 3, 2023 City Council Meeting TO: Mayor Martin and Members of the City Council FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: September 28, 2023 MEETING: October 3, 2023 City Council SUBJECT: Planning Department Updates Land Use Application Review A) Meander Park and Boardwalk – Meander Rd, east of Arrowhead Dr – Medina Ventures had requested PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat approval for a development to include four residential units north of Meander Rd, and commercial uses south of Meander Rd including a venue, restaurant, daycare, and speculative retail space. The City Council granted amended PUD and Final Plat approval at the April 18 meeting. The applicant has submitted an amendment to the plat and plans which would add a strip of property along the east of the property, increase the size of the daycare, add parking, and proposes solar panel “carports” over much of the parking lot. Staff is reviewing information and will present if complete, potentially at the October 10 Planning Commission meeting. B) 500 Hamel Road Apartment Concept Plan – Medina Apartments LLC has requested review of a concept plan review for development of a 97-unit apartment building at 500 Hamel Rd. The Planning Commission and Council provided comments in the fall of 2022. The developer held a series of neighborhood workshops with neighboring property owners, most recently on September 21, 2023. A few City Council and Planning Commission members and I attended. C) 1225 Maplewood Concept Plan – John and Lisa James have requested review of a concept plan for a three-lot subdivision. Staff is conducting preliminary review and will schedule for a public hearing when complete. D) School Lake Nature Preserve 3rd Addition and PUD Amendment – School Lake Nature Preserve LLC has requested to separate the area of the formal garden from one of the lots within the development. The garden area is proposed as a stand alone outlot. The City Council granted approval at the September 19 meeting. Staff will work with applicant to finalize documents necessary to meet the conditions of approval. E) Preserve of Medina (fka Blooming Meadows) – east of Holy Name Dr, north of CR24 – Tim Boser has requested PUD General Plan and Preliminary Plat approval for a 5-lot rural subdivision. The applicant proposes to restore a large area of wetlands and create a wetland bank in addition to the lots. The City Council granted general plan of development and preliminary plat approval on August 2. Staff will await final plat application. F) Cates Industrial Park – Comprehensive Plan Amendment– Oppidan has requested final plat approval for a 310,000 square foot warehouse/office development east of Willow Drive, north of Chippewa Road. Staff has been informed that the acquisition may not be proceeding. Staff is investigating to determine what action, if any, is necessary with pending applications. G) Grossman Septic Variance – 3082 Highway 55 – Jaymes Grossman has requested a variance for the setback for a septic system from wetlands to replace an existing system. The Council approved the variance at the August 15 meeting and the project will now be closed. H) BAPS Site Plan Review – 1400 Hamel Road – BAPS Minneapolis Medina has requested an amendment to their approved site plan review. The Council approved the amended Site Plan Review at the December 6, 2022 meeting. The applicant has submitted site/civil construction MEMORANDUM Planning Department Update Page 2 of 2 October 3, 2023 City Council Meeting plans for review and has indicated that they may move forward with site work in the fall of 2023 or spring of 2024. The applicant has indicated that building construction likely would not begin until the spring of 2024. I) Hamel Townhomes Final Plat – 342 Hamel Rd – Hamel Townhomes, LLC has requested final plat approval for a 30-unit townhome development. The Council granted final plat approval on August 16. Staff will work with the applicant to finalize documents prior to beginning of construction. J) Ditter Heating and Cooling Site Plan Review – 820 Tower Drive – Ditter Heating and Cooling has requested a Site Plan Review for an approximately 5,000 square foot addition to its building. The application is incomplete for review and will be scheduled for a hearing when complete. K) Pioneer Trail Preserve – This project has been preliminarily approved and the City is awaiting final plat application. Other Projects A) Fall Business Tours – Staff attended the tour at AutoMotorPlex on September 26. B) Tree Preservation Ordinance – staff presented the Tree Preservation Ordinance to the Planning Commission for preliminary discussion. The Planning Commission provided recommendations at their September 12 meeting, Council discussed on September 19 and the ordinance will be presented again on October 3. C) Emerald Ash Borer grants – WSB is preparing grant applications for state funding related to EAB. Staff has been meeting with WSB and providing background information. D) Highway 55 turn lanes/Adam’s Pest Control – Adam’s Pest Control has indicated that they intend to begin construction of the turn lanes into their site. MnDOT requires the City to administer the construction, so WSB is coordinating with the developer’s team to see that MnDOT requirements are met. TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Jason Nelson, Director of Public Safety DATE: September 28, 2023 RE: Department Updates Last week I attended the annual Homeland Security Emergency Preparedness Conference at Breezy Point. The conference was good. It focused on many topics about preparedness and wellness of employees. Spent valuable time networking with our local Hennepin County Emergency Preparedness Director and others within his office. Sergeant Hall attended the Criminal Justice Mental Health Summit in Plymouth last week on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday. I was able to attend as well on Thursday. The Keynote speaker Travis Howze, is an international speaker that focused on motivational wellness, leadership, mental wellness, and resiliency. Both conferences were very valuable. My leadership team and I will get together to talk about different strategies that we can look at in the future, especially when it comes to employee wellness and to promote career and family longevity. We are also working on expanding our workout facility upstairs in our facility. Officer John Vinck is working hard to create a bigger space for our workout room. We have done some remodeling and will be moving into the bigger room upstairs, which will allow for more equipment to be utilized. Medina Celebration Day was a big success again this year. Administrative Assistant Klaers and others did a great job of planning the event. It was very well attended, and everyone seemed to have a great time. This event is fun to participate in and it is nice to see the community come together. As I drove the kiddie train around the entire park, I realized that our public works and others that work on the park have created a beautiful place for all to come and enjoy many activities. There are numerous residents from the Plymouth side that attended as well. We have a great community that is becoming more and more diverse, and it is enjoyable to see the interaction at Medina Celebration Day. Patrol: The following are updates of Patrol Officers between September 12 and September 25, 2023: Citations – 5 Warnings – 78 PD Accidents – 2 PI Accidents – 2 Medicals – 17 Falls – 3 Suspicious Calls – 5 Traffic Complaints – 11 Other Agency Assists – 17 Business/Residential Alarm- 12 Welfare Checks - 4 Disturbance Calls - 4 *Sgt. Boecker was out of the office this week. Investigations: Received digital contents from phone warrants and went through those. Received two fraud cases. Received theft case. Case forwarded to me from another agency for follow up. Attended MN Organized Retail Crime Association Conference. Booked a suspect for a previously charged assault. Booked a suspect for a previously charged stop arm violation. Closed several cases. Burglary cases referred to county attorney. Investigations currently has 11 open/active cases. 1 TO: Medina Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Steve Scherer, Public Works Director DATE: September 28, 2023 MEETING: October 3, 2023 SUBJECT: Public Works Update Streets • Public Works backfilled and shouldered where necessary prior to the second lift of asphalt on Town Line Road and Juniper Curve. The final lift is scheduled, and striping will follow. The project has gone very well. The Public Works team has done a great job on both the road reconstruction and community relations with city representatives and residents of all three cities. • Public Works is completing some blacktop repairs at Deerhill Road. We are also repairing the Tomahawk and Hamel Road intersection. Water/Sewer/Stormwater • Jim Stremel and I are exploring the possibility of moving the water treatment plant expansion forward. We have some water usage data to look at before bringing it back to Council. • The Willow Drive Lift Station project looks great. We are on schedule for a late September or early October startup date. • Public Works will be completing our annual inspection of valves and manholes to ensure they are not a hazard to the snowplows in the months to come. • The Independence Beach Lift No1 pumps are large, very expensive, and have some issues. I’m working with the Met Council (MCES) for reimbursement of $62,000 to cover repairs as negotiated in our maintenance agreement. Parks/Trails • The grandstand project at Hamel Legion Park looks great and will be completed soon. HAC is also working on field maintenance which includes mound work and new sod. • The ballfield/open space at Hunter Lions Park looks great. The seeding finally took off and we expect the field to be ready for practice/play next year. • The kayak rack was installed at Lakeshore Park. There is interest for next season as this season slips away. The viewing decks are a big hit and a great addition in the park. • The seal coating on the Clydesdale trail really makes the entire street scape look new as it helps preserve the trail. MEMORANDUM Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 1 of 15 October 10, 2023 Amended Plat, PUD General Plan Planning Commission Meeting TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dusty Finke, Planning Director DATE: October 6, 2023 MEETING: October 10, 2023, Planning Commission SUBJECT: Public Hearing – Medina Ventures – Medina Park and Boardwalk - 1472 Highway 55 (PID 0211823330003) – Plat and PUD Plan Adjustment Summary of Request On January 17, 2023, the Medina City Council granted PUD general plan and preliminary plat approval for the Meander Park and Boardwalk. On April 18, 2023, the Council granted approval of an amendment to the PUD as well as final plat approval. The applicant has not commenced with construction at this time and has indicated that they intend to begin in the spring of 2024. The applicant has requested an amendment to change the general plan of development in the following ways: 1) Applicant proposes to purchase strip of property east of the commercial development and incorporate additional land into the project. 2) Increase daycare building from 7500 s.f. to 11,000 s.f. 3) Increase parking from 229 stalls to 249 stalls. 4) Increase square footage of lower level of the event venue structure. 5) Construct ground-mounted solar panel “car-ports” over portion of the parking lot. 6) Adjust landscaping plan to shift trees from under solar panels to other locations. The subject site is located north of Highway 55, south of Meander Road, and east of Arrowhead Drive. An aerial of the site and surrounding property can be found at the top of the following page. The strip of property proposed to be added to the project is outlined with a magenta dashed line. Although the City has granted approval of the PUD and plat, the PUD ordinance has technically not yet become effective. One of the provisions of the ordinance was that it would not take effect until the Meander Park and Boardwalk plat is recorded, which has not yet occurred. Nonetheless, the approvals remain in place and can be effectuated upon recording of the plat. Many aspects of the proposal remain unchanged. This report will first provide context on the proposed changes noted above, but then also provide the broader review of the development. Most of the information except for the changes noted above will be unchanged from previous reports. Proposed Uses: Event Venue 13 lodging suites Restaurant Day Care 9,600 s.f. retail 4 townhomes. Gross Site Area: 18 acres Net Site Area: 4.9 acre commercial 1.5 acre residential Land Use (north): LDR Current Zoning (north): RR-UR Land Use (south): Commercial Current Zoning (south): CH Proposed Zoning: PUD MEMORANDUM Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 2 of 15 October 10, 2023 Amended Plat, PUD General Plan Planning Commission Meeting Purpose of a Planned Unit Development According to Section 827.25, PUD provisions are established to provide comprehensive procedures and standards designed to allow greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and/or nonresidential areas by incorporating design modifications and allowing for a mixture of uses. The PUD process, by allowing deviation from the strict provisions of this Code related to setbacks, lot area, width and depth, yards, and other development standards is intended to encourage: 1. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design, and placement of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. 2. Higher standards of site and building design. 3. The preservation, enhancement, or restoration of desirable site characteristics such as high-quality natural resources, wooded areas, wetlands, natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 3 of 15 October 10, 2023 Amended Plat, PUD General Plan Planning Commission Meeting 4. Innovative approaches to stormwater management and low-impact development practices which result in volume control and improvement to water quality beyond the standard requirements of the city. 5. Maintenance of open space in portions of the development site, preferably linked to surrounding open space areas, and enhanced buffering from adjacent roadways and lower intensity uses. 6. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly development and use pattern and more convenience in location and design of development and service facilities. 7. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lower development costs and public investments. 8. A development pattern that effectuates the objectives of the Medina Comprehensive Plan. (PUD is not intended as a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles.) 9. A more desirable and creative environment than might be possible through the strict application on zoning and subdivision regulations of the City. When reviewing a proposed amendment to a PUD, staff believes it is reasonable to consider these purposes within the context and scale of the proposed amendment. Two potential ways to frame an amendment may be to consider: 1) If a proposed change of a PUD seems contrary to the purposes of the PUD ordinance, it may be appropriate to deny the amendment; 2) the Planning Commission and Council may consider whether they would have supported the PUD if it were to have been proposed in this way originally. The City has a high level of discretion when considering PUD requests, including amendments to previously approved PUDs. As noted above, the previous approvals would still be in place if the City does not approve the proposed amendments. Summary of Proposed Changes Incorporation of additional land to east The applicant proposes to expand the footprint of the plat and development 34 feet to the east by purchasing additional land. This additional property allows for construction of an additional 20 parking stalls and to increase the size of the childcare building. The parking lot is proposed to be setback 10’ from the “new” eastern property line, which was the same setback within the approved PUD. The setback for the structures on the site from the eastern property line will increase as a result of the line shifting east. The property to the northeast of the subject site includes a 60’-wide strip of property extending north from Highway 55 which runs adjacent to east side of the entire subject site. This strip of property is part of the rural residential parcel to the northeast. A driveway is located within the strip north of Meander Road. This driveway used to extend to Highway 55 prior to Meander Road being constructed in the late 1990’s, but there are currently no improvements within the strip of land south of Meander Road. The applicant has requested to subdivide the strip of land south of Meander Road from the land north of Meander Road to allow them to purchase and incorporate into the project. The applicant has indicated that they would only need to incorporate 34’ of the 60’. In discussion with the applicant, staff indicated that the City may likely consider whether there is interest in the Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 4 of 15 October 10, 2023 Amended Plat, PUD General Plan Planning Commission Meeting remaining width for a trail easement. This location was identified as one possible location for the future Diamond Lake Regional Trail crossing of Highway 55. The City obtained a trail easement to the southeast of Highway 55 as part of the Loram Industrial plat. Incorporating this strip of property into the project provides the City the opportunity to discuss the need for trail easement and staff also believes it will be advantageous for the strip of property to be in common ownership with either the subject site, or the parcel to the east. If the City does not ultimately determine that a trail easement is necessary in this location, the remaining 26’ of land could be platted as an outlot and either sold to the property to the east or incorporated into the subject site at some point in the future. Staff has not identified concern with the proposal to add the additional land into the project. See Park Dedication section on page 12-13 for more information related to potential trail easement. Increase Childcare Building Size The applicant proposes to increase the size of the childcare building from 7500 to 11,000 square feet. The structure is proposed to be deeper toward the parking lot but maintain the same setback to Meander Road as previously approved. The building is proposed to be slightly longer as well, but the setback to the “new” eastern property line is larger than previously approved. As noted above, adding additional property allows for an additional 20 spaces within the development. The parking analysis states that parking demand of this larger use would be an additional 10 spaces and the peak parking demand is anticipated to differ from the event venue and restaurant. Staff has not raised concern with the increase in size for the childcare structure. Increased Parking The applicant proposes to increase the number of parking stalls from 229 to 249. Parking was discussed during the original approval process, especially related to larger events at the event venue. The approved PUD required the owner/operator of the event venue to implement an active parking management plan for larger events which would include actions such as shuttling to off-site parking locations. The parking management plan still anticipates active parking management, but additional parking is advantageous. See parking information on page 11 for more detail. Increased Lower Level Area – Event Venue The applicant proposes to increase the size of the lower level of the event venue building from 7000 to 15,000 square feet. The applicant proposes to add approximately 8000 s.f. of floor area for data center use in addition to area in the lower level for storage and service space for the event venue. The applicant has indicated that a data center use would only have a few employees. Staff recommends a condition that no other use be permitted within this area without review to confirm that sufficient parking is provided. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 5 of 15 October 10, 2023 Amended Plat, PUD General Plan Planning Commission Meeting Solar Panel Car-ports The applicant proposes to install ground mounted-solar arrays over approximately ¾ of the parking spaces. Ground-mounted solar equipment is not permitted within the underlying CH district, but the applicant requests the allowance as part of the PUD. Although ground-mounted solar equipment is not permitted in the CH district, it is allowed within the B zoning district, subject to the following conditions. For the sake of comparison, staff has summarized the proposed solar equipment with the requirements in italics: (1) Ground-mounted Solar Equipment shall only be permitted in the Business and Industrial Park zoning districts and only following Conditional Use Permit approval. The underlying zoning district is CH and ground mounted solar equipment would generally not be permitted but could be allowed through the PUD. (2) Solar Equipment shall be set back a minimum of 300 feet from residential property. The proposed equipment is more than 300 feet from surrounding residential property. The townhomes within the PUD north of Meander Road are just under 300 feet from the equipment. (3) Solar Equipment shall meet all setback requirements for principal structures in the zoning district where located. The proposed equipment is located within the parking lot and exceeds the setback of all structures. (4) The footprint occupied by Solar Equipment shall be considered lot coverage and impervious surface for the purpose of calculating such standards. The footprint shall include all space between pieces of Solar Equipment unless the pieces are separated by more than 25 feet. The equipment is proposed over the parking lot, which is already impervious surface. (5) The footprint occupied by Solar Equipment shall not exceed 20% of the lot. The proposed equipment is over the proposed parking lot and is approximately 12% of the buildable portion of the commercial portion of the site. (6) The equipment or device may not exceed a height of 20 feet. The height of the proposed equipment is under 16 feet. (7) The City may require landscaping or other means of screening to limit visual impacts of the mounting devices of the Solar Equipment. The proposed equipment is within the proposed parking lot. Landscaping is proposed around the site, and the Planning Commission and Council could determine if more landscaping is necessary related to the solar equipment. (8) The equipment or device must be designed and constructed in compliance with all applicable building and electrical codes. Staff would recommend compliance with this condition if the solar equipment were approved. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 6 of 15 October 10, 2023 Amended Plat, PUD General Plan Planning Commission Meeting (9) The equipment or device must be in compliance with all state and federal regulations regarding co-generation of energy. Staff would recommend compliance with this condition if the solar equipment were approved. (10) All solar arrays or panels shall be installed or positioned so as not to cause any glare or reflective sunlight onto neighboring properties or structures or obstruct views. The solar panels are proposed within in inverted V to point internal. Staff recommends a condition to verify non-reflective characteristics for the panels. The equipment is located within the parking lot surrounded by taller structures, so staff does not believe they would obstruct views. (11) The City may require compliance with any other conditions, restrictions or limitations deemed reasonably necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare and to promote harmony with neighboring uses. The Planning Commission and Council can discuss whether any additional conditions are appropriate. Cross-section of the solar panels can be found on the final page of the plans and photos of other installations are attached to the applicant’s narrative. As noted above, ground-mounted solar equipment is not permitted within the underlying CH zoning district but would be permitted within the B district. The proposed equipment appears to meet the requirements which apply within the B district. The Planning Commission and City Council can discuss whether allowing the solar equipment within the PUD serves the purposes of the PUD district. Adjust Landscaping Within Parking Lot If the solar equipment is constructed as described below, the landscaping plan would need to be adjusted to shift trees out of the parking lot under and near the solar equipment. The applicant proposes the same number of trees as originally approved but proposes to shift them to other locations. Staff believes this amendment is appropriate if the solar equipment is approved. Proposed Plat/Site Layout-Commercial The following table compares the proposed commercial development with the dimensional standards of the CH district. The applicant proposes an integrated development which shares parking. As such, parking crosses the property lines and the buildings are closer to one another. Setbacks noted below are to the exterior of the site. The applicant has proposed to subdivide the strip of property south of Meander Road from the remaining property owned by the owners to the northeast and then to incorporate this property into the amended plat. This split would need to occur simultaneous with the proposed plat o neither would be permissible. Staff recommends a condition that the amended plat be contingent upon approval of the lot split and be conditioned upon the split. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 7 of 15 October 10, 2023 Amended Plat, PUD General Plan Planning Commission Meeting CH Requirement Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Minimum Lot Size 1 acre (0.5 acre if coordinated) 2.78 acre 0.79 acre 1.164 acre 0.941 acre Minimum Lot Width 100 feet 150’ 250’ 160’ 230’ Minimum Lot Depth 120 feet 430’ 120’ 250’ 210’ Front Setback (Meander) 25 feet 160’ 12’ NA NA Front Setback-Hwy 55 50 feet 177’ NA 140’ 138’ Side Setback 15 feet 205’ W 50’ E 56’ E 285’ W Residential Setback 50 feet 160’ 48’ NE 12’ N 440’ 440’ Parking Setbacks Front Yard 25 feet 62’ 62’ NA NA Side/Rear 10 feet 310’ W 10’ E 10’ E NA Residential 40 feet 62’ N 62’ N NA NA Building Height 45 feet 30’ 23’ 18’ 16’ Hardcover 75% 50% of gross area; 73% of upland area The proposed lots meet the dimensional standards required for lots within an integrated development. The approved PUD provided flexibility for the setback for the daycare building from Meander Road. The approved PUD identified four twin homes north of Meander. The proposed amendment does not alter the proposed arrangement from that which was originally approved. The following table summarizes the layout of the residential portion of the site approved on the PUD. R1 Requirement R2 Requirement Proposed Net Density 2-3 units/acre 2-3 units/acre 3.5 units/acre Minimum Lot Size 11,000 s.f. 5,000 s.f./unit 14,520 s.f./unit incl shared drive Min Lot Width 90 feet 50 feet/unit 50 feet/unit Min Lot Depth 100 feet 90 feet 90 feet Front Setback 25’ (30’ to garage) 25’ (30’ to garage) 4.5’ to drive 50’ to Meander Side setback 25’ combined (10/15) 15’ combined (10/5) (single-family) 10’/10’ (2-family) 483’ to north 12’ between units Rear setback 30’ 25’ 489’ to west Max. Hardcover 40% 50% 50% of net area The applicant proposes to plat a 26’ wide outlot along the eastern property line, which would be deeded to the City if the City requires dedication of a trail easement. If the City does not require the easement, the applicant could either incorporate that property into the lots or could plat this outlot to be combined in the future or sold to the property to the east. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 8 of 15 October 10, 2023 Amended Plat, PUD General Plan Planning Commission Meeting Architectural Design The approved PUD included specific architectural requirements for the structures which varied from the general standards of the CH district and were discussed at length during review. The applicant has not proposed alteration to the proposed architectural design of the structures, except for the increased size of the daycare building. Architectural information is included for with the approved plans for reference. Wetlands The wetland along the western edge of the development requires upland buffers with the average width indicated to the right. The Wetland Classification Avg Buffer Min Buffer North of Meander Preserve 35’ 25’ South of Meander Manage 2 25’ 20’ Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 9 of 15 October 10, 2023 Amended Plat, PUD General Plan Planning Commission Meeting width of the buffer can be averaged along the edge of the wetland, provided the width is not less than the average width indicated, and provided the area of the buffer is at least equal to the area of the average buffer. The City also requires a 15-foot setback for principal structures from the buffers. The approved PUD provided flexibility for the minimum width of buffer in some locations, but resulted in a total area of upland buffer which exceeds the minimum area if the average buffers were applied. The proposed buffers are not proposed to be changed. • Buffer width of 2’ adjacent to the water feature along the boardwalk (area to be made up in other locations along the wetland) • Provide less area of upland buffer adjacent to the wetland north of Meander Road but provide more area adjacent to the wetland south of Meander Road to offset. • Elimination of structure setback to buffer for the townhomes – fencing is proposed to prevent impacts to buffer. The applicant is not proposing wetland impacts within their development site, but construction of turn lanes and the trail to support the development would necessitate 0.13 acre of wetlands impacts. Staff recommends a condition that any approval be subject to approval and implementation of a wetland replacement plan. Floodplain A floodplain is located within the large wetland to the west of the site with a base flood elevation of 986. The lowest floor elevation of the twin homes and venue basement is proposed at 989, which meets the minimum required separation of two feet. The plans do include fill below the floodplain elevation for the street widening and trail construction. The applicant proposes to excavate in other locations adjacent to the floodplain to provide compensatory storage. Tree Preservation, There are a total of 78 existing significant trees on the subject site; approximately 34 trees near the existing barn on the property and 44 trees (cottonwood, ash and boxelders) along the edge of the wetland. The applicant proposes to remove 68 of the trees (87%) on the site. The tree preservation ordinance would generally allow 30% of the trees to be removed without replacement. The applicant notes that 44 of the trees to be removed are boxelder and cottonwood, and 19 are ash trees. The applicant requests flexibility from replacement as part of the PUD. The tree preservation ordinance does include a provision to exempt pioneering trees such as boxelder, but this is intended as part of natural resource management. The PUD previously approved provided flexibility in terms of replacement as shown on the landscaping plan. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 10 of 15 October 10, 2023 Amended Plat, PUD General Plan Planning Commission Meeting Landscaping - Commercial Landscaping standards can be altered in connection with a PUD, but the requirements for commercial districts are provided for reference. • Building Setting - At least 10 feet of landscaped area shall be provided adjacent to all buildings except for walks, outdoor sales areas, plaza space and approved loading docks. Walks within this landscaped area shall be limited to where practically necessary to serve access points of buildings. • Minimum Planting: • Parking lot landscaping – minimum of 8% of parking lot area • Landscaping islands every 20 spaces, wider separations for cells of 120 spaces The number of plantings has not changed significantly from the plan approved with the original PUD. As noted above, the applicant proposes to shift shade trees which were previously proposed in the parking lot to the perimeter of the site if the solar arrays are approved. The approved PUD allowed 5% of the parking lot area to be landscaped, rather than the 8% required by code. The applicant has redesigned the parking lot area and added 20 spaces, resulting in lower % of landscaped area. Staff seeks feedback from the Planning Commission and Council if a further reduction is acceptable, or if 5% should be required. Providing more landscaping would result in the loss of a few parking spaces. Landscaping – Residential The proposed landscaping plan has not changed compared to the plan approved with the original PUD. The R2 district would require a minimum of 2 trees per unit. A buffer yard would be required to the east and west of the subject residential development. In this case, there is a wetland with a width more than 1000 feet to the west. The applicant has proposed 24 shade and coniferous trees as well as a hedge of shrubs and perennials east of the shared driveway. Transportation Transportation considerations were reviewed at the time of original approval and the proposed amendments would not change the outcome significantly. The applicant proposes one access for the commercial property to Meander Road along the west of the project. The applicant has submitted a traffic analysis which has been reviewed by the City Engineer. The analysis recommended construction of a left-turn lane from Meander into the site. The City completed a visioning study for future Tamarack Drive located approximately ¼ mile to the east during the summer of 2020. The vision anticipated a signalized intersection at Highway 55 and Tamarack Drive which would serve as the primary access for commercial development in the area, including the subject site. The study included a broader study of the future circulation for development property east and west of Tamarack Drive as well. The conceptual layout approved at the end of the study calls for connection from Meander Road to Tamarack Drive and for the commercial development in this area to have convenient access to Requirement Required Proposed Overstory trees 1 per 50’ site perimeter 49 trees 50 Ornamental trees 1 per 100’ site perimeter 25 trees 26 Shrubs 1 per 30’ site perimeter 82 shrubs 174+1074 perennials Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 11 of 15 October 10, 2023 Amended Plat, PUD General Plan Planning Commission Meeting the connection to more easily reach Tamarack Dr. The City Council discussed potential connectivity from this site to the commercial property to the east during concept plan review. Ultimately, the City Council’s feedback during concept plan review was that the City should not require a street connection through this subject site or a specific connection to the east. The Council encouraged that the design provide flexibility for potential connection to the east so that connectivity may be possible depending on the layout of the site to the east. The proposed layout of this site includes parking along much of the eastern frontage. Staff believes this provides a fair amount of flexibility, because an access could be extended to the east almost anywhere along the edge of the parking lot. Staff recommends a condition addressing the possibility of this future connection in the development agreement. The Tamarack visioning study had identified the cost of improvements at Highway 55 to install the signals and turn lanes and had estimated the area of different new uses which necessitate the improvement. The subject site was estimated as 5.4% of the signal project and 8.2% of the northern turn lanes at Highway 55. Staff recommends that the City require execution of a Petition and Waiver allowing future assessment of this portion of the project against the lots in the development. Parking As noted above, the applicant proposed to construct 20 spaces more than shown on the originally approved plan. Increasing the size of the daycare building increases parking demand less than 20 spaces and is expected to not occur at the same peak as the event venue and restaurant. The applicant proposes approximately 249 parking spaces. Adding the total minimum parking spaces for the uses, a minimum of 268 spaces would be required. The parking ordinances allows adjustments to minimum parking requirements for shared parking when peak use does not overlap. Staff believes the venue and restaurant would share peak use, which would be at different times from the daycare. As such, providing consideration for shared parking seems reasonable. The applicant included a parking needs analysis as part of their traffic study. The analysis concludes that parking would be sufficient during average parking generation. It concludes a deficit at the 85 percentile of parking generation. The applicant notes that they would propose to use valet parking and shuttling for large events. The applicant also anticipates significant rideshare use for the venue. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant implement these practices as necessary and that agreements be recorded against the lots ensuring shared parking. Sewer/Water The applicant will extend sewer and water to the site from the east. Staff recommends that sewer service be extended north of twinhomes because this is anticipated to serve future residential Use Calculation # Required stalls Restaurant 1 stall/3 seats 250 seats 84 Venue 1 stall/3 seats 300 capacity 100 Daycare 1/250 s.f. 7500 s.f. 44 Retail 1/250 s.f. 10,000 s.f. 40 Total: 268 Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 12 of 15 October 10, 2023 Amended Plat, PUD General Plan Planning Commission Meeting development north of Fields of Medina. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant address comments of the City Engineer, which are attached for reference. Stormwater/Grading Review The applicant proposes stormwater management with a dry retention basin for the twin home area and a biofiltration basin and underground irrigation reuse for the commercial area. Staff recommends a condition that the applicant meet the requirements of the Elm Creek Watershed and address the comments of the City Engineer. Lighting The applicant proposes lantern-style light fixtures which are downcast but provide a decorative shield which glows. The applicant also proposes lighting beneath the solar panels if these are approved. Details are included with the plans. The CH district requires all lighting to be downcast and that light not exceed 0.5 FC at the property line. The applicant has submitted photometrics which show compliance with this requirement. Park/Trails/Multi-Modal The Park Commission is scheduled to consider park dedication at their October 21 meeting. The approved plat and PUD required a trail easement along the north of Meander Road and cash-in-lieu of additional dedication. With the inclusion of the property to the east, staff recommends reevaluating park dedication. The City’s subdivision ordinance requires the following to be dedicated for parks, trails and public open space purposes, at the City’s option: • Land – 0.8 acre – Up to 10% of the buildable land • Cash-in-lieu of land – estimated $60,000-$90,000 (to be confirmed by City Assessor) – 8% of the pre-developed market value; residential portion subject to minimum of $3500/residential unit, maximum of $8000/residential unit • Combination of the above The Park at the Fields of Medina is located approximately ¼ acre to the northeast of the site and no additional park improvement are identified in the City’s Park Plan. An existing trail is located north of Meander Road to the northeast of the site. The City’s trail plan calls for the trail to be extended westerly to Arrowhead Drive. Staff would recommend that necessary easements be provided along the north of Meander Road and that the trail be constructed in connection with the development, as least to the edge of the wetland. The applicant proposes sidewalk, boardwalk and trail connections within the commercial development as well. Staff would recommend that the sidewalk near the boardwalk be extended to the eastern property line for potential connectivity in the future. As noted above, the Fire Chief has requested a 2nd emergency access to the site. The applicant has indicated that they will propose a wide and heavily constructed trail/sidewalk along the east of the site from Meander to the parking lot. Staff believe this trail will provide good opportunities for connectivity to the east in the future. Park Dedication • Trail along north of Meander • Trail easement along east • Park fee for remainder Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 13 of 15 October 10, 2023 Amended Plat, PUD General Plan Planning Commission Meeting The potential route for the Diamond Lake Regional Trail is also in the vicinity of this property. The route shows the corridor going from north of Fields of Medina with a grade-separated crossing of Highway 55. The conceptual route approved by City Council for consideration in the Master Plan is shown in green on the aerial to the right. The site is outlined in pink. Although the conceptual route is east of the subject site, staff believes it is advisable to consider alternative opportunities to provide the most flexibility for the trail to be connected in the future. It may be advantageous to require dedication of more easements than may be necessary to provide more flexibility to link the corridor with adjacent sites. The City may not utilize all of the easements, but could vacate in the future. The City obtained a large trail easement from the Loram plat, located southeast of Highway 55. Staff would recommend that a trail easement be considered along the east of the commercial development to provide an opportunity to connect from Meander Road to a Highway 55 crossing location. It should be noted that easements could be required from future development of the larger commercial site further east, but staff believes it may be advisable to obtain the easement from this project, because the timeline of development to the east is not known. Review Criteria/Staff Recommendation The City has a high level of discretion when reviewing a PUD because it is a rezoning, which is a legislative action. The PUD purpose and options of how an amendment to a previously approved PUD may be framed are described on pages 2 and 3. The most significant change appears to be the addition of the solar panel carports. The Planning Commission and City Council are encouraged to consider how that change serves the purposes of the PUD district. Staff does not believe the other changes significantly alter the original approval. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 14 of 15 October 10, 2023 Amended Plat, PUD General Plan Planning Commission Meeting If the Planning Commission and Council determine that the proposed amendment meets the objectives described above, the following action could be taken: Move to recommend the amended PUD and plat subject to the following conditions: 1) Approval of the plat is contingent upon effectuation of a subdivision for the additional property to the east. 2) The Applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City, which shall include the conditions described below as well as other requirements by City ordinance or policy. 3) The Applicant shall install all improvements shown on the plans dated 09/11/2023 except as may be modified herein. The plans shall be updated to address the comments of the City Engineer. 4) Use of the lower level of the event venue shall be limited to data center use or accessory storage/service space for the venue. 5) Solar equipment shall be designed and constructed in compliance with all applicable building and electrical codes and shall be in compliance with all state and federal regulations regarding co-generation of energy. 6) The Applicant shall construct turn lane improvements on Meander Road as recommended by the City Engineer. 7) The Applicant shall execute and record instrument(s) in a form and of substance satisfactory to the City Attorney to ensure all lots have access to a public roadway. 8) The Applicant shall provide park dedication as determined by the City Council 9) The Applicant shall ensure that the secondary emergency access is maintained/plowed to ensure usability. 10) Vehicle-resistant barriers or fencing shall be provided between Meander Road and the play area for the daycare. 11) The watermain and hydrants within the commercial lots shall be privately maintained. 12) The Applicant shall submit a letter of credit in an amount of 150% of the cost of site improvements in order to ensure completion. 13) The Applicant shall execute and record a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney to describe the responsibility of the property owners to maintain the private stormwater improvements. 14) The Applicant shall implement the Wetland Conservation Act Wetland Replacement Plan. 15) The Applicant shall establish Upland Buffers in the locations identified on the General Plan of Development. Such buffers shall meet the requirements of the wetland protection ordinance including but not limited to: execution and recordation of Upland Buffer Easement Agreement in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney, planting of appropriate vegetation, and installation of signage. 16) The commercial property shall be subject to the City’s lawn and landscaping irrigation regulations. No lawn or landscape irrigation systems shall be permitted to be connected to the City water system. 17) The Applicant shall obtain all permits required by Elm Creek Watershed District, Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Minnesota Department of Health, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council and any other relevant agencies. 18) The Applicant shall enter into a petition and waiver with the City in a form and of substance acceptable to the City Attorney related to future assessment for construction of Tamarack Drive. Meander Boardwalk and Park Page 15 of 15 October 10, 2023 Amended Plat, PUD General Plan Planning Commission Meeting 19) The Applicant shall provide proof of agreement(s) for off-site parking during peak usage that meets the satisfaction of the City. 20) The Applicant shall provide for ongoing active management of the lodging facilities located on the commercial property. 21) Building plans shall be subject to review and approval by City staff for general compliance with the general plan of development and Architectural Narrative document created by Villamil Architecture dated 04/04/2023, except as required to be modified herein. 22) The Applicant shall address the comments of the City Attorney’s plat opinion and abide by the recommendations of the City Attorney with regard to title matters and recording instructions. 23) The plat shall be recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder and Registrar of Titles within 180 days of the date of the resolution or the approval shall be considered void, unless a written request for time extension is submitted by the Applicant and approved by the City Council. 24) The Applicant shall pay to the City a fee in an amount sufficient to reimburse the City for the cost of reviewing the plat, general plan of development, construction plans, and other relevant documents. Attachments 1. Engineer Comments 2. Applicant Narrative 3. Plat 4. Plans K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2023-09-12 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2023-09-29 Meander Park & Bdwk Final Plat & Plans - WSB Engineering Review.docx 70 1 X E N I A A V E N U E S | SU I T E 3 0 0 | M I N N E A P O L I S , M N | 55 4 1 6 | 76 3 . 5 4 1 . 4 8 0 0 | W S B E N G . C O M September 29, 2023 Mr. Dusty Finke City Planning Director City of Medina 2052 County Road 24 Medina, MN 55340-9790 Re: Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD/Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review City Project No. LR-23-341 WSB Project No. 019539-000 Dear Mr. Finke: WSB staff have reviewed the Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD Plans and Final Plat submittal dated September 11, 2023. The applicant proposes to construct a business park, boardwalk, recreational amenities, and four townhomes on a total of 18-acres located along Meander Road on the north side of TH 55 and east of Arrowhead Drive. The documents were reviewed for general conformance with the City of Medina’s general engineering standards and Stormwater Design Manual. We have the following comments with regards to engineering and stormwater management matters. Final Plat & General Comments 1. The City Planner will provide comments pertaining to the proposed landscaping, sidewalk/trail connectivity/easements, and tree preservation plan under separate cover. 2. Provide additional right-of-way along Meander Road to accommodate future right turn lanes into the applicant’s commercial site and the future commercial site further to the east that will have an access road opposite Cavanaugh Drive. Complete. 3. Provide additional ROW on the north side of Meander Road, 2’ from far edge of trail. In progress, the applicant is proposing a trail easement to accommodate the additional area. Complete. 4. A visioning study was completed in August of 2020 that included this development area, the adjacent commercial development area to the east, and the Tamarack Drive extension corridor. The study included potential commercial site layouts that indicated access between commercial parcels. For the primary access drive lane proposed from Meander Road south and east adjacent to the future “Day Care” location provide cross access easement agreements to provide flexibility in the connection of the driveway to future easterly commercial areas. In-progress, applicant to provide. Consider the reduction of parking spaces along this corridor to minimize conflict points. See additional comments below within the traffic study section. Complete. 5. Provide confirmation that sufficient electrical service is available for the data center use. Complete. 6. In order to calculate a letter of credit and construction engineering escrow amounts for the final development agreement, an engineer’s estimate (in Excel format) of the proposed street and utility improvements along with a schedule for completion of City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD/Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review September 29, 2023 Page 2 K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2023-09-12 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2023-09-29 Meander Park & Bdwk Final Plat & Plans - WSB Engineering Review.docx construction will be required. The estimate should also include the cost of landscaping items. 7. Additional comments have been provided directly on the plan sheets. Not all comments on the plans have been summarized in this review letter. Existing Conditions & Demolition Plans (Sheets C1.0 – C1.2) 8. With preliminary plat submittal, provide a removals/demolition plan to show what trees are proposed to be removed, buildings to be demolished, impacts to Meander Road, etc. Complete. 9. The existing site and demolition plans will also need to include existing utility pipe sizes, pipe material types, etc. Complete. Site & Paving Plans (C2.0 – C2.2 & C3.0 – C3.2) 10. Provide a figure showing truck movements throughout the site including the largest truck (semi-truck) and the largest fire truck. Design driveways and circulation routes to accommodate these vehicles and turnaround space(s) as required by the City Fire Marshall. The Fire Marshall will review and provide comments under separate cover. Provided and in-progress, awaiting Fire Marshall approval. 11. City design standards typically require horizontal and vertical curve lengths to meet a 30 MPH design speed (for the townhome road). Where site constraints do not allow this standard to be met and the roadway is designated as private, the City will consider alternative designs where emergency access requirements are met. Complete. 12. The proposed private road does not meet City design standards at 20’, refer to City design standards. Complete, 13. The City standard for a trail width is 8’ with 5’ boulevard. The plans show a 10’ trail along Meander Road. Complete, City staff is fine with 10’ wide trail. 14. A fence is shown directly adjacent to edge of emergency access to Meander, please move at least 2’ from edge of trail to provide more clearance. Complete. 15. Add no parking signage along private driveway, this will be used as a fire lane. Complete. 16. Additional Meander Road comments: a. Meander Road is a State aid street and so State Aid design standards are necessary. Complete. b. For the proposed improvements along Meander Road, the design standards for horizontal and vertical curves will need to mee a 40 MPH design speed. Complete. c. Provide a profile view with future submittals that include vertical curve lengths. Provide alignment data. Complete. d. Lane widths meet state aid standards. Complete. e. Provide confirmation that turn lane length sufficient to accommodate projected turning movements into the site. Complete. City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD/Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review September 29, 2023 Page 3 K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2023-09-12 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2023-09-29 Meander Park & Bdwk Final Plat & Plans - WSB Engineering Review.docx f. If this plan is submitted to MnDOT State Aid there will need to be an SEQ, earthwork information, and cross sections. Complete, the applicant is not submitting for funding and so this will not be needed. Grading, Drainage, & Erosion Control (Sheets C4.0 – C4.4) 17. Provide a more detailed grading and drainage plan with future submittals. With final plat submittal include drainage arrows on the grading plan showing the direction of flow and slope percentages. Complete. 18. Provide EOF locations for all low points inside and outside the roadway. Complete. 19. A full review of the erosion/sediment control plan and SWPPP sheets will be completed with final construction plans. a. Silt fence should be shown around all wetland boundaries. Redundant perimeter control is required adjacent to wetlands. Complete, the applicant has shown bio- roll as the redundant BMP. 20. With final plat submittal provide the following a. In general maintain all surface grades within the minimum of 2% and maximum 33% slopes. Vegetated swale grades shall also be a minimum of 2.0%. Complete. b. Drainage arrows on plans showing direction of runoff. Note specifically high points between each side-yard swale. Complete. c. Include percent slope In all other swale locations and verify that it meets the City requirement of 2% minimum. Complete. d. The City will require a common draintile collection system (rigid PVC Schedule 40 or SDR 26) for sump pump discharges. A separate foundation pipe system in addition to the sump discharge system should be considered where full basements are proposed. The size of the common collection system should be 6” and comprised of PVC schedule 40 or SDR 26. Complete. e. Add rip-rap quantities and class notes at each flared end section and pond overflows (if applicable). Complete, provided on storm sewer sheets. f. Note the size of proposed storm sewer structures. Complete, provided on storm sewer sheets. 21. The grading of the Private Drive changed from the last submittal and no longer has the “inverted crown” to direct drainage to the singular catch basin (CB-103). In general, an alternative design should be considered with a more consistent crown and/or cross slope that incorporates curb and additional catch basins. The prior/current design will be more difficult to construct without the risk of unintended long term drainage consequences. 22. See other comments on the plans about specific drainage concerns/considerations. SWPPP (Sheets C4.5 – C4.6) 23. The proposed project will disturb more than one acre. Develop and include a SWPPP consistent with the MPCA CSWGP with future plan submittals. Complete. 24. An NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit (CSWGP) shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. In-progress, provide copies of permit documents prior to the start of construction. City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD/Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review September 29, 2023 Page 4 K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2023-09-12 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2023-09-29 Meander Park & Bdwk Final Plat & Plans - WSB Engineering Review.docx 25. A detailed review of erosion/sediment control and SWPPP will be conducted with the final construction plan submittal. In-progress with plan updates. 26. Redundant erosion control, applicant is proposing the redundancy to be a bio-roll so there is flexibility in moving and changing locations. Utility Plans (Sheet C5.0 – C5.4) General 27. With final construction plans, provide conformation of MDH (watermain) and MPCA (sanitary sewer) plan review and permitting. The City Engineer will need to review and sign the sanitary sewer permit. Based on the current design, it appears the applicant will also need to apply for a permit from the DLI, provide copy to City. In-progress, awaiting final permitting documents from applicant. 28. Any public sanitary sewer and watermain shall be encompassed by drainage and utility easements where located outside of public road right of way. Drainage and utility easements will need to allow for a 1:1 trench from the invert of the utility with a minimum of 20’ centered on the utility. Additional easement needed for 30’ deep sanitary sewer, verify need to acquire additional easement on adjacent property to the east. 29. Consider routes for the sewer/watermain that utilize the same tranches and/or connect in similar locations. For example, make the connection with the proposed watermains at the same location on Meander utilizing a cross instead of separate tees (easterly connections). Complete. 30. The general location of existing/proposed watermain and sewer were shown on the concept plan. With future submittals also show the nearest existing hydrants and valve locations. Label the pipe size and pipe material for existing/proposed watermain and sanitary sewer. Complete. 31. Add general notes to the utility plans to the effect of: Complete. a. The City shall not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that are associated with variations in the utility as-built elevations. All utility connections shall be verified in the field. b. The City, or agents of the City, are not responsible for errors and omissions on the submitted plans. The Owner and Engineer of Record are fully responsible for changes or modifications required during construction to meet the City’s standards. c. All watermain and sanitary sewer testing shall be conducted in accordance with the City standards and specifications. Copies of all test results shall be submitted to the City (Public Works Director, City Engineer), the Owner, and the Engineer of Record. d. Watermain shall have a minimum cover of 7.5’. e. Tracer wire installation shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the MN Rural Water Association Standards. See these standards for further details. f. The City will require televising for sanitary sewer pipe installations prior to accepting a warranty for the utility system; provide report and video files to the City for review. 32. With final construction plan submittal provide the following: a. Plan/profile sheets for watermain and sanitary sewer along the townhome access road. The sanitary sewer will be considered a public main. Unchanged City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD/Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review September 29, 2023 Page 5 K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2023-09-12 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2023-09-29 Meander Park & Bdwk Final Plat & Plans - WSB Engineering Review.docx b. Provide dimension notes from watermain to parallel sewer mains (storm and sanitary sewer); the minimum horizontal separation between mains is 10 feet. Where watermain crosses storm or sanitary sewer, add a note at each location to the effect of “Maintain 18” Minimum Separation, 4” Rigid Insulation” on both the plan view and profile view locations (both utility and storm sewer sheets). Improved, but not provided at each location. a. Show water/sewer service location to each lot and include the curb stop location at utility easement location (10’ beyond ROW). For each lot location add the low floor elevation, sewer service station from downstream manhole, sewer service invert elevation at utility easement (10’ beyond ROW), riser height if applicable, and curb stop elevation. Provide additional information, see markups on plan. Watermain 33. Hydrant locations shall be approved of by the Fire Marshal; typically, a maximum of 250’ influence radius (approximately 400’ spacing) is required to serve the immediate residential areas. Provide an exhibit showing hydrant influence spacing. In-progress, awaiting Fire Marshall approval. 34. Watermain looping connections will be needed to minimize long dead-end watermain sections. Consideration of further watermain looping needs, stubs for future phases, or other adjacent developments may be required and will be reviewed with future submittals. With that in mind, at the southeasterly portion of the site, provide an 8-inch stub to extend east. Complete. 35. The watermain connections to the building(s) shall be reviewed and approved by the City Fire Marshall. Show the location of the PIV (if sprinklered) and curb stop location on the plan(s). The City requires that domestic and fire services are separate taps from the main; A separate curb stop is required for the domestic service and gate valve (PIV) for the fire line. Complete. Sanitary Sewer 36. Sanitary sewer main extending to the north into the detached townhome development area will need to be placed as deep as possible to account for future development connections to the north. Complete. 37. The sewer service shown for the Day Care building should be directed downstream. The City does not allow service to be connected directly to manholes. Sewer main entering/existing a manhole should have at least a 90 degree separation where possible; one of the manholes shown with less than a 90 degreed separation. If the existing watermain stub will not be used, the City will require that it is removed up to the existing watermain. Complete. 38. With future submittals show proposed sanitary sewer service line invert elevations on plans; the City requires a minimum depth of 4’ from low floor elevations. A separate water/sewer service. Complete. 39. Gravity sewer is being proposed to serve all units within the development. The City’s typical standard is to place sewer a minimum of 10’ below the surface (18” vertical separation below the watermain). Where this depth is not feasible, the City will allow an 8’ depth; depths less than 8’ will require review on a case-by-case basis. Storm Sewer City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD/Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review September 29, 2023 Page 6 K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2023-09-12 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2023-09-29 Meander Park & Bdwk Final Plat & Plans - WSB Engineering Review.docx 40. With final construction plans, if basements are proposed with the detached townhomes, the City will require draintile or other connections for sump pump discharges connecting to the storm sewer system. A separate foundation pipe system in addition to the sump discharge system should be considered. Complete. 41. Storm sewer stubs are shown on the plan, confirm whether these are for roof drains. 42. The City will require subgrade 4” draintile to extend 150’ upstream from the CB’s on Meander Road. Note size/pipe material on plan, a cleanout is required at each upstream end. 43. The City public works department is fine with 8” watermain through the commercial site, unless calculations are provided that show a 10” pipe is needed for capacity and fire flow, or required by the Fire Marshall. Civil Details (Sheets C6.0 – C6.12) 44. The proposed street and pavement sections should be reviewed and designed by a geotechnical engineer. Provide soil borings and geotechnical report with final plat submittal. Geotechnical report referenced in pavement section details does not provide for a specific design but more generalizations, provide full report. A typical section for the private drive not provided. 45. A full review of standard details will be conducted with the final construction plan submittal. a. Inside drop details provided (Sheet C6.2) – Where on the plans are inside drop manholes proposed? The City does not allow inside drops, they must be outside drops. b. Separate the retaining wall detail from detail plate STR-13 on Sheet C6.5. c. The City no longer allows the internal “top-hat” on sanitary sewer manholes and instead requires “Flex-Seal” to be installed. This is also an ESS Brothers product or approved equal. Note correction on sanitary sewer manhole detail(s). Stormwater Management 46. The applicant will need to submit a Stormwater Management Plan and modeling consistent with Medina’s Stormwater Design Manual. 47. The development will need to meet the City’s volume control requirement to capture and retain onsite 1.1” of runoff from the net new impervious surface. By satisfying the volume requirement the water quality requirement is considered met. Follow the City’s Stormwater Design Manual for alternative credits towards the volume requirement if infiltration is not feasible. Stormwater treatment will be required north of Meander road before discharging into the wetland. Complete. 48. Water quality control standards are considered satisfied if the volume control standard for the site has been met. If it is infeasible to meet the volume control standard due to contaminated soils, site constraints, or other factors, the proposed BMP will need to detain and treat a sufficient volume of stormwater to achieve a phosphorus load reduction of 20% from existing conditions using an approved BMP. Complete. 49. The applicant may want to consider using the stormwater ponds for irrigation. Credits for volume control can be given for stormwater reuse. City ordinance does not allow for City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD/Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review September 29, 2023 Page 7 K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2023-09-12 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2023-09-29 Meander Park & Bdwk Final Plat & Plans - WSB Engineering Review.docx municipal water system to be used for irrigation. Re-use for irrigation is being proposed, however the additional credit is not needed to meet the volume control requirements. Complete. a. 2. Approved capacity of an irrigation practice will be based on: i. Approved capacity of an irrigation practice will be based on: 1. An irrigation rate of 1.0 inches per week over the irrigated pervious area(s) or the rate identified through the Stormwater Reuse Calculator (whichever is less); or as approved by the City; 2. No greater than a 26 week (April 15th to October 15th) growing season. ii. Design of the irrigation system must include, but is not limited to, the following items. Each system will be reviewed and approved by the City on a site-by-site basis. 1. Plumbing code review, adherence, and permitting, if applicable. 2. Water reuse pump system design including supply line, intake, meter, and pump. 3. Electrical and controls design. 4. Construction drawings, specifications, and system integration. iii. Two (2) feet of permanent pool from the bottom of the pond must be maintained following drawdown for irrigation. Stormwater Design Manual City of Medina, MN WSB Project No. 011705-000 Page 20. iv. Use rates should be monitored at least monthly for at least three years. This should be compared to the water budget analysis of the design to determine whether the modeled level of performance is being achieved. 50. The development will need to meet the City’s rate control requirement, which states that post development discharge rates for the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year Atlas 14 MSE 3, 24-hour storm events must be less than or equal to existing conditions discharge rates. Complete. 51. The City requires two feet of freeboard from structure low openings to 100-year high water levels and EOF’s. Provide maintenance access to all ponding facilities. Complete. a. Provide EOF routes and HWL for the stormwater BMP’s to verify there is suitable freeboard. b. Legend shows symbol for EOF 944.5’ but does not appear on the basins. Please update the EOF for each basin and label on the plan set. c. Stabilized EOF’s should be provided for all low areas. 52. HWL elevations should be shown for each stormwater bmp on the plan set. Complete. 53. CB131 should be a sump with a minimum of 4’ to provide pretreatment before discharge to filtration basin. Meander road CB should have pretreatment before discharging into filtration basin. Complete. 54. Include soil borings to verify that is a minimum of 3’ of separation from the bottom of the filtration basin to the seasonally saturated soils. Complete. 55. Provide size, amount, and slope of proposed drain tile within the filtration basin. Complete. City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD/Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review September 29, 2023 Page 8 K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2023-09-12 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2023-09-29 Meander Park & Bdwk Final Plat & Plans - WSB Engineering Review.docx 56. The development will need to meet the appropriate watershed standards for Elm Creek Water Management Commission and the applicant shall submit for the required permits. In-progress, the applicant has applied but needs to provide copies of final permit approval. 57. No private storm water facilities may be approved unless a long-term maintenance plan is submitted that defines how access will be provided, who will conduct the maintenance, the type of maintenance and the maintenance intervals. The long-term maintenance plan along with other stormwater maintenance requirements may have been included with the project development agreement. The applicant shall obtain all necessary easement or other property interests to allow access to the facilities for inspection or maintenance for both the responsible party and the City of Medina. a. Include recommended maintenance and operation guidelines for all stormwater bmp’s including water reuse. Manufacture recommendations should be included when available. Traffic & Access 58. Based on the proposed site plan the anticipated traffic generation would be approximately 2,256 daily trips, 398 AM peak hour trips and 440 PM peak hour trips assuming the uses outlined in the proposed site plan (venue space, daycare, restaurant, twin homes, retail space). The proposed access to the site is located on Meander Road approximately 470 feet west of Cavanaugh Drive and has an acceptable spacing (greater than 400 feet). Complete, acknowledged by applicant. 59. Based on the anticipated traffic generation left and right turn lanes should be provided on Meander Road at the site access for the commercial site to the south. Also, a two lane northbound approach should be provided on the south site approach to Meander Road (left / right turn lanes). The site plan includes a left turn lane into the site and the two-lane northbound approach from the site. The analysis indicates that the eastbound right turn lane would not be required for capacity. It should also be looked at with respect to safety utilizing right turn lane warrant criteria. Complete, the analysis was provided and ROW was included for future turn lanes if needed. 60. Only one site access is proposed for the commercial area to the south. With the anticipated traffic generation from the site, consideration of a secondary access in the easterly direction which can accommodate the future development area to the east of the site should be considered. The intention was to extend this internal site roadway up to the future Tamarack Drive extension as indicated in the visioning and traffic study completed in August 2020. A future access to the development area to the east is not included or discussed with the proposed plan. This should be documented. Complete, currently the second access is shown as emergency access only, but the plan appears to provide flexibility for a future access to the east from the parking lot area if needed. 61. A traffic analysis should be completed documenting the queuing of vehicles at the site access to Meander Road. The parking row should be located such that it does not interfere with the queuing of vehicles. A traffic analysis was completed dated September 8, 2022. We have the following comments on the Traffic and Parking Study. Complete. i. The Capacity and Level of Service worksheets should be provided. Complete. City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD/Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review September 29, 2023 Page 9 K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2023-09-12 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2023-09-29 Meander Park & Bdwk Final Plat & Plans - WSB Engineering Review.docx ii. The analysis indicates that the eastbound right turn lane would not be required for capacity. However, based on the traffic conditions the right turn lane volume is anticipated to be larger than the Meander Road thru volume. The need for a right turn lane should also be looked at with respect to safety utilizing right turn lane warrant criteria. - Complete iii. The parking demand should be analyzed assuming “Shared Parking”. This can be completed by evaluating the time-of-day peaking characteristics of each use found in the ITE Parking Generation Manual. This may improve the parking needs for the peak events. Complete. iv. Is it reasonable that patrons would walk from the Loram property to the event center? If so are facilities available to accommodate the pedestrian movements? Complete. v. Conclusion #4 indicates no roadway improvements. This should be modified to include the turn lanes assumed (left turn lanes) and identified in the study (possible right turn lane). Also address comment for left turn lane. Complete. 62. A sight line analysis (vertical curves) should be completed at the driveway intersection on Meander Road. Provide an exhibit. Provided, see plans provided with set, plan/profile drawings. Complete. Wetlands & Environmental 63. Permanent and temporary wetland impacts are proposed. Permanent impacts totaling 0.09 acres have been approved by the WCA, conditional on the purchase of 0.18 acres of wetland credit from a wetland bank. A USACE Section 404 permit is also required for the project. Complete. The USACE permit has been received and the purchase of wetland credits has been verified by BWSR. 64. Upland buffers and buffer setbacks will be required for the project. The northern lobe of Wetland 1, north of Meander Road is classified as a Preserve based on the City’s functional classification of wetlands and requires an average 35-foot buffer (minimum 25 feet). Buffer shown on the site plan notes 17-foot minimum buffers in areas abutting a proposed split rail fence, which do not meet the City’s ordinance. The southern lobes of Wetland 1, south of Meander Road are classified as Manage 2 and requires 25-foot average buffer (minimum 20-feet). Buffer shown on the site plan notes 2- foot minimum buffers, which do not meet the City’s ordinance. The city will determine if flexibility from the buffer ordinance is appropriate during the PUD review process. 65. The proposed gazebo is an accessory structure and requires a 5-foot buffer setback. No planned buffer was shown for the gazebo. Not applicable, gazebo removed from plans. 66. Approved wetland boundaries should be shown on the grading plans or the site plan of the property. Complete. 67. Upland Buffer Zones and locations of buffer markers must be shown on the grading plans or the site plan for the property. Complete. 68. The Meander Park & Boardwalk Development Wetland Buffer Memo (dated 9/9/22) notes that the residential units on the north site would have decks that extend over the upland buffer zone but would allow for vegetation to grow beneath. City ordinance requires that upland buffer zones are preserved predominantly in their natural state and alterations, City of Medina – Meander Park & Boardwalk PUD/Final Plat & Plans – Engineering Review September 29, 2023 Page 10 K:\019539-000\Admin\Docs\2023-09-12 Submittal (Final Plat)\_2023-09-29 Meander Park & Bdwk Final Plat & Plans - WSB Engineering Review.docx including mowing, removal of vegetation, or the introduction of non-native vegetation are prohibited. Homeowners of the proposed residential units must be aware of this prohibition such that mowing and unapproved plantings do not occur within the upland buffer zone. 69. Similar to the comment above, the upland buffer zone beneath the proposed boardwalk/deck area on the southern wetland, should an exemption from the Principal Structure Setback Buffer requirement be approved, must remain predominantly in its natural state. 70. Disturbed areas within the upland buffer zone must be seeded with a native seed mix. Complete – Seed Mix 35-641 noted on landscape plan. With future submittals, include a response to the comments in this letter. We would be happy to discuss this review in more detail. Please contact me at 612-419-1549 if you have any questions or if you would like to set up a time to meet. Sincerely, WSB Jim Stremel, P.E. City Engineer Memorandum www.srfconsulting.com 3701 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, MN 55416-3791 | 763.475.0010 Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer SRF No. 15295.01 To: Dusty Finke, Planning Director City of Medina From: Paul Schroeder, Project Manager Date: September 11, 2023 Subject: Meander Park & Boardwalk – Entitlement Project Revision Summary Overview On behalf of the development team of Chris Pederson-Medina Ventures, LLC, Pablo Villamil- Villamil Architects, and Paul Schroeder-SRF Consulting Group, we are providing this memo to summarize project revisions that are identified on the related resubmitted plans, reports, and documents. Meander Park & Boardwalk project was approved by the City of Medina City Council in April 2023 and advancements in project development proceeded. During the following months, an opportunity arose to purchase additional land to enhance the project, which are described below. It is our request that the City of Medina Planning Commission and City Council provide a simple re- approval of our current application to accommodate the minor changes. Project revisions are almost exclusive to the south commercial parcel with an exception of a small modification to the drainage and utility easement by the underground storm chamber on the north parcel. Property Medina Ventures, LLC has come to an agreement with the easterly adjacent property owner, Paul Hermann and Robert Clarke, to purchase the entire 60-foot corridor, approximately 690 feet long according to Hennepin County GIS records, between Meander Road and Highway 55 and adjacent to the eastern edge of the development property. The Property Identification Number is 0211823310005 and contains a 60 foot wide parcel from Highway 55 to the farmsteads northeast of the project, including the farmstead property itself. The 60-foot corridor, south of Meander Road appears to previously contain the farmsteads driveway from Highway 55, but was truncated when Meander Road was constructed. There has been little development activity for this corridor and has been minimally maintained involving an old driveway and adjacent easterly grove of trees. Of the 60 foot-wide corridor, Medina Ventures, LLC plans to incorporate approximately 34 feet on the western side of the strip for the development as indicated in the updated civil site plan. It is our understanding that City would favor pledging the remaining 26 foot strip of land on the eastern side of the parcel towards park dedication, which Medina Ventures, LLC is agreeable with expectations Dusty Finke – City of Medina September 11, 2023 Meander Park & Boardwalk – Entitlement Project Revision Summary Page 2 of it being credited towards the current $64,640 cash in-lieu park dedication fee, which we expect would reduce that fee in accordance with the City’s park dedication formula. It is our understanding that the City would prefer a lot split to subdivide the property before sale, and then after sale, be included in the final platting of Meander Park & Boardwalk. The platting of the south commercial property area will basically just extend the internal lot lines and Meander ROW dedication line to the new easterly boundary. Site Plans, Preliminary Plat, and Final Plat have been updated to on the civil site plan for the development showing the 34’ wide parcel areas and updated drainage and utility easements. Any additional site plan showing the entire 60’ parcel will be provided to the City as soon as needed along with documentation showing the transfer of land ownership. Site Plan and Site Lighting The extra property for the south commercial area has allowed the expansion of the Day Care building, going from 7,500 SF to 11,000 SF, which now accommodates a footprint more conducive to a modern-day care (childcare) provider. This building enlargement retained the PUD 12’ minimum building setback to Meander Road and pushed the structure into the first row of parking and further east toward the new additional property. The trash enclosure was flipped to the east side of the building and the fire lane / play areas were adjusted accordingly. The parking lot was modified by the day care building and expanded to the east which increased parking from 229 spaces to 249 spaces. To further modernize the parking lot, solar carports are being added to three dual rows of parking that will provide solar panels above on a butterfly structure, that will provide both renewal energy and some parking cover. The three middle parking islands under the solar carports will now contain Electric Vehicle charging stations and up to six adjacent parking stalls will be marked as such. Additional images of the solar carports are within the architectural plans. The Event Venue has some minor footprint revisions but basically is the same size, however the basement, containing storage, service/mechanical controls and a data center, is being enlarged to cover the entire building footprint, versus the smaller previous submittal. The larger trash enclosure and service drive under the boardwalk have been updated per the building demands and the revisions are illustrated on the Site Plans. The Landscape Water Feature is still in the project and generally located at the south end of the Event Venue, however the second location by the Event Venue trash enclosure may have limited space and is currently not shown in this location. Site Lighting Site lighting is similar to previous approved plans and meet the city’s requirements, but have some adjustments. The solar carports create a canopy over the parking areas, so lighting under the solar panels will be provided, such as rope lighting or individual fixtures mounted to the carport structure. The perimeter of the parking, excluding the carport area, is lit by parking pole lights, similar to before and is represented in the revised Photometric plan. Dusty Finke – City of Medina September 11, 2023 Meander Park & Boardwalk – Entitlement Project Revision Summary Page 3 Landscaping Trees in the parking islands by the solar carports would have a detrimental effect on solar performance, so these 18 trees in the 9 parking islands have been relocated along Meander Road and at the southeast corner of the property. Shrubs and perennials still remain in the six end-parking islands, however the solar carports cover the middle three island, so plants have been redistributed elsewhere in the project and rock mulch is now provided in the landscape bed where the Electric Vehicle charge stations will be located. Areas under the boardwalk/deck will have landscape rock mulch cover, since there would be minimal plant growth. Landscape beds around Event Venue and Day Care buildings have been updated due to the site revisions, and more strategic trees, shrubs, and perennials have been provided along the blank north wall of the Event Venue. Grading, Stormwater, and Utilities The basement of the Event Venue needed more clearance, so the basement elevation was lowered by 8 inches and the 1st floor raised by 8 inches to provide an overall increase of 1 foot and 4 inches, which also included raising the Retail and Restaurant building by 8 inches and blending grades in the parking lot. The Day Care building and easterly parking lot had some minor grade adjustments to accommodate the new site plan. The stormwater system, including the underground storm chamber was updated to reflect the increased impervious surface, but has the general layout and design. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain have been adjusted throughout the site, primarily at the easterly end of the new parking lot and the project is now looking at implementing geothermal heating/cooling to the site, with the underground pipe field in the boardwalk and wetland buffer area. Solar is also scheduled for the roofs of some of the buildings and at the carports, as previously mentioned. Updates have been provided on the Grading, Storm Sewer, and Utility Plans. Parking and Traffic Study The Parking and Traffic Study has been updated documenting the minor increase in Day Care building size and additional parking spaces, but since the parking lot is shared and reviewed as a Planned Unit Development, there is minimal issue. Architectural The Event Venue footprint is about the same as before but has added a full basement (15,600 SF) below the 1st floor versus the previous partial basement (7,033 SF). However, the use is still just scheduled for the similar size events with the lower level for storage and a data center. Interior uses have been modified to further refine the Event Venue operations including stairs from the boardwalk to the lower level and appropriate doors at all levels. The lodging on the second and third floors have been slightly reduced from 14 units to 13 units. The trash enclosure has been enlarged to accommodate the facility’s needs and have been moved further away from the building. The Day Care building has been enlarged but shows the same façade character as previously approved. Dusty Finke – City of Medina September 11, 2023 Meander Park & Boardwalk – Entitlement Project Revision Summary Page 4 Solar carport in Parking Lot We are looking for flexibility to install solar carport in the parking lot of our PUD given that ground-mounted panels are technically not permitted in the underlying Commercial-Highway zoning district. That being said, ground mounted solar panels continue to be installed in more and more places across the US (and world), and many have likely seen ground mounted solar panels visible from major highways and freeways across the State of Minnesota; a trend we expect to continue to grow given the environmental benefits that reducing reliance on fossil fuels provides and the finite nature of non-renewable energy sources. Structurally speaking, the solar panels installed at Meander Park and Boardwalk would be static, meaning they will not move and do meet the footprint and height limitations for ground mounted solar panels. Furthermore, adding a solar carport to our already forward-thinking development plan will not only provide significant renewable energy power to the development, but also offer shade from the sun for any vehicles parking under them during the day as well as temporary rain protection for patrons to be shielded from during inclement weather. They will also protect the asphalt underneath them from the elements, which from a long-term thinking perspective will reduce maintenance and prolong the life of the asphalt, making for a more sustainable development overall. After all, not only does more renewable energy equal less fossil fuel reliance for electricity production, but by minimizing asphalt repair and maintenance, also reduces fossil fuel reliance given that one of the main ingredients that hold asphalt together is bitumen, which is a byproduct of petroleum. Lastly, the lighting provided underneath the panels themselves are likely to cause less light pollution from the development overall given the nature of positioning lights underneath a solar carport vs typical parking lot lights which have higher height elevations and generally more visible from surrounding area homes. H:\Projects\15000\15295.01\_Sent\Medina Ventures\230907_MV-Draft Memo Project Revisions\Memo_15295.01-Meander-ProjectRevisionSummary_SRF_2023-09-07.docx RES UNIT 1 RES UNIT 3 DAY CARE (CHILD CARE) 11,000 SF RES UNIT 2 RES UNIT 4 RESTAURANT 4,952 SF NORT H P L A Y AREA 6 5 0 0 S F PL A Y A R E A WEST PLAY AREA 3,800SF RETAIL 9,510 SF T TT T EV EV EV EV EV EV EVENT VENUE 15,600 SF BASEMENT (STORAGE / DATA) 15,600SF 13 LODGING UNITS (2ND/3RD FLOORS) 10,200 SF T TR E E * 7 8 TR E E * 2 8 TR E E * 2 9 TR E E * 3 3 TR E E * 6 2 TR E E * 6 1 TR E E * 6 0 TR E E * 5 9 TR E E * 5 8 TR E E * 5 7 >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> S W E L L PE D C VL T C C F O PE D C E E( U G ) E( U G ) F/O(UG) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > >> >> G G F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) S S S N PRELIMINARY PLAT PP1.0 I hereby certify that this plan, survey, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 15295 N. SCHAUFENBUEL N. SCHAUFENBUEL P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL PRELIMINARY PLAT LEGEND PROPERTY LINE - PROPOSED LOT LINE EXISTING INTERNAL LOT LINES EXISTING EASEMENT PROPOSED EASEMENT SETBACK LINE (VARIABLE, NOT SHOWN) EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AREA LOT 1 BLOCK 1 LOT 2 BLOCK 1 LOT 3 BLOCK 1 LOT 4 BLOCK 1 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B ROW DEDICATION TOTAL 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 42,256 SF 377,988 SF 3,908 SF 442,152 SF 0.103 ACRES 0.103 ACRES 0.103 ACRES 0.103 ACRES 0.970 ACRES 8.677 ACRES 0.090 ACRES 10.150 ACRES THE FOLLOWING LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AS SHOWN ON LOT SURVEY PRODUCED BY SKYSURV, DATED NOVEMBER 17, 2021. Parcel 1: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 118, Range 23, excepting therefrom the East 196.73 feet thereof; and the North 457.63 feet thereof. Parcel 2: The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 2, Township 118, Range 23 except that part thereof lying South of the North 457.63 fee of said Southwest Quarter and lying West of the East 196.73 feet of said Southwest Quarter and Except the East 60 feet thereof. Parcel 3: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 118, Range 23, lying North of the railroad right-of-way, excepting therefrom the East 60 feet thereof, in Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXISTING PROPERTY AREA = 866,174 SF (19.885 ACRES). ·NORTH PARCEL = 442,152 SF (10.150 ACRES). ·SOUTH PARCEL = 360,372 SF (8.273 ACRES). ·ROW EASEMENT = 40,575 SF (0.931 ACRES). ·ADDITIONAL EAST PROPERTY = 23,075 SF (0.530 ACRES). EXISTING PROPERTY - LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1.EXISTING PROPERTY IS BASED ON LOT SURVEY COMPLETED BY SKYSURV, DATED NOVEMBER 17, 2021, WHICH ALSO REFERENCES CERTAIN ITEMS, LIKE WETLAND DELINEATION, PROVIDED BY AREA M SHAPE FILE. SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY DATA PROVIDED BY SRF CONSULTING, SUMMER OF 2022, AND PLATTING IN 2023. 2.PROJECT BEARINGS ARE BASED ON HORIZONTAL DATUM NEAD83(2011) AND VERTICAL DATUM NAVD88. 3.SRF PROJECT BENCHMARK IS LOCATED AT: SW CORNER OF SECTION 2, T118N, R23W, N: 194782.799, E: 453467.220, ELEVATION 995.550. 4.EXISTING ZONING - RURAL RESIDENTIAL URBAN RESERVE (RR-UR) = NORTH PARCEL, COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY (CH) = SOUTH PARCEL. 5.PROPOSED ZONING - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) = NORTH PARCEL, AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) = SOUTH PARCEL. 6.BUILDING SETBACK LINES = VARIABLE (PUD). 7.EASEMENTS AS DESCRIBED AND ILLUSTRATED ON PLAN, AS APPLICABLE. 8.PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION IS RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED HOUSING FOR THE NORTH PARCEL, AND COMMERCIAL RETAIL FOR THE SOUTH PARCEL. FIRST FLOOR ELEVATIONS, SEE DEVELOPMENT GRADING PLAN. 9.SEE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL PROJECT INFO. 10.SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT DETAILS. PLATTING NOTES PROPOSED PLAT NAME: MEANDER PROPOSED PARCEL INFO: PROPOSED PROPERTY MEANDER - PLAT SUMMARY - NORTH LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA ACRES HIG H W A Y 5 5 M E A N D E R R O A D LOT 1 BLOCK 2 LOT 2 BLOCK 2 LOT 3 BLOCK 2 LOT 4 BLOCK 2 OUTLOT C ROW DEDICATION TOTAL 121,073 SF 34,331 SF 50,713 SF 41,000 SF 133,304 SF 3,011 SF 383,432 SF 2.780 ACRES 0.788 ACRES 1.164 ACRES 0.941 ACRES 3.060 ACRES 0.069 ACRES 8.802 ACRES MEANDER - PLAT SUMMARY - SOUTH LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA ACRES BLOCK 2 BLOCK 1 LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4 LOT 1 LOT 2LOT 3 LOT 4 S00°16'12"W 512.20 N00°10'09"E 1264.65 N6 9 ° 5 9 ' 3 2 " E 6 4 9 . 6 5 N8 7 ° 2 1 ' 2 4 " W 5 9 5 . 0 6 S8 7 ° 2 1 ' 2 4 " E 6 0 5 . 9 3 19.79 D=25°36'41" R=44.28 16.12 D=20°51'53" R=44.28 S00°16'12"W 1328.42 N8 9 ° 2 5 ' 3 5 " W 6 1 2 . 7 3 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 90 . 0 0 90 . 0 0 90 . 0 0 90 . 0 0 72 . 2 8 22 0 . 1 4 99.04 13 3 . 1 7 131.11241.35 72. 8 1 44 . 6 0 111.25 61.4231.00 27 . 0 0 7.8 6 62.58 51 . 9 9 85 . 6 3 139.25 27 . 0 0 62.00 31.00 45 . 0 0 95 . 7 6 75.57 24 3 . 8 5 PROPOSED 28' WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED PERIMETER 10' WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) PROPOSED PERIMETER 10' WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED 20' WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED 20' WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT S00°05'24"E 164.65 ROW DEDICATION 6.50 X 607.43 X 16.12 X 597.91 MINIMUM 12' FROM BACK OF CURB WITH ADDITIONAL 10' TRAIL EASEMENT ROW DEDICATION 6.01 X 312.00 X 6.00 X 312.00 MINIMUM 22' FROM BACK OF CURB ROW DEDICATION VARIABLE SIZE 275' FUTURE RIGHT-TURN LANE AND TAPER 20' FROM BACK OF FUTURE CURB FUTURE RIGHT-TURN LANE BACK OF CURB 60 7 . 4 3 83 . 8 5 6.00 5.84 84 . 1 0 125.69 1 12-22-2022 REVISION 3 2-10-2022 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS 5 09-11-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 70 . 9 5 93 . 5 5 49 . 0 0 59.10 41.98 29.03 66.00 87.00 95.41 26.4 6 41 . 0 4 6.82 46 . 2 5 68 . 0 1 25 . 9 5 16.63 66 . 7 9 43. 0 0 47.75 29.38 40.42 131.61 54.79 19.82 20.97 46.6 2 19. 6 9 51 . 4 6 OUTLOT B OUTLOT A OUTLOT C 54.56 43. 1 0 14 9 . 6 7 13 0 . 6 5 32 5 . 6 1 6.506.01 177.12 463.81 266.47 698.87 COU N T Y D I T C H 2 6 APP R O X I M A T E C E N T E R L I N E NO R T H W E S T E R N B E L L T E L E P H O N E CO M P A N Y E A S E M E N T DO C . N O . 2 4 2 5 8 5 1 PROPOSED 36' WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED PERIMETER 10' WIDE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.) CAVANAUGH DRIVE ADDITIONAL PROPERTY - 34' WIDE WESTERLY CORRIDOR OF PID 0211823310005 FROM MEANDER ROAD TO HIGHWAY 55 S00°05'24"E 177.12 66.06487.21 N6 9 ° 5 9 ' 3 2 " E 3 5 . 0 2 68 . 1 5 MEANDER ROAD EASEMENT TOTAL 40,575 SF 40,575 SF 0.931 ACRES 0.931 ACRES MEANDER - PLAT SUMMARY - EXISTING ROW LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA ACRES RES UNIT 1 RES UNIT 3 DAY CARE (CHILD CARE) 11,000 SF RES UNIT 2 RES UNIT 4 NORT H P L A Y AREA 6 5 0 0 S F PL A Y A R E A WEST PLAY AREA 3,800SF T TR E E * 7 8 VL T C C F O PE D C E E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) F/O(UG)F/O(UG) >> >> >> S S · · · N SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 P. SCHROEDER 15295 N. SCHAUFENBUEL N. SCHAUFENBUEL P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25721 MICHAEL C. AARON 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL SITE PLAN NORTH C2.2 WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15') WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER DELINEATED WETLAND LINE 10 TOTAL PARKING SPACES (INCLUDING 2 PER GARAGE AND 2 VISITOR) UPPER LEVEL DECK, LOWER LEVEL WALKOUT (TYP.) WETLAND WETLAND 2 CAR GARAGE PER UNIT (TYP.) VISITOR PARKING (9'X18' STALL) FIRE TRUCK HAMMERHEAD TURN-AROUND, PER MN STATE FIRE CODE FIGURE D103.1 INVOLVING "ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO 120' HAMMERHEAD" DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.), SEE UTILITY PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT 10 ' B I T U M I N O U S T R A I L W / 5 ' B O U L E V A R D SHARED RESIDENTIAL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY WITH RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE DRIVE, EX. GRAVEL RESIDENT DRIVEWAY, AND TRAIL EXISTING 12'± GRAVEL RESIDENT DRIVEWAY 4.5 ' 20 . 0 ' 4' M I N . 50.0' 60.0' 70 . 0 ' 20.0' R28' R28' 43.7' 45 . 0 ' 12.7' 17.5' 17.5' 3.0' 45 . 4 ' WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER SETBACK PUD FLEXIBILITY AT DEVELOPMENT, MIN. 25' AT GENERAL AREAS AND 17' AT RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH SPLIT RAIL FENCE AT BACKYARD PERIMETER (TYP.) WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER SPLIT RAIL FENCE AT RESIDENTIAL DOCK AREA NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL 1 10-20-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE 2 11-04-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS 5 09-11-2023 CITY RESUBMIT RETAINING WALLS WITH SPLIT RAIL FENCE CAVANAUGH DRIVE TYP. SECTION A.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - STOP SIGN (30"X30", R1-1) B.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - NO PARKING FIRE LANE (12"X18", R7) C.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - ADA PARKING SIGN (12"X18", R7-8M) WITH VAN ACCESSIBLE (6"X12", R7-8bP) D.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - DUAL TURN LANE ONLY OPPOSITE (36"X30", R3-8aa) E.ENVIRO SIGNAGE - WETLAND BUFFER (TBD) F.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - 4" WIDE SOLID - WHITE PAINT G.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - 4" WIDE SOLID - YELLOW PAINT H.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - DOUBLE 4" WIDE SOLID WITH 4" GAP - YELLOW PAINT I.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - DOUBLE 4" WIDE SOLID OUTSIDE, DASHED INSIDE (10' W/ 40' GAP) WITH 4" GAP - YELLOW PAINT J.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - ADA SYMBOL AND NO PARKING ACCESS AISLE - WHITE PAINT K.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - LEFT TURN ARROW (PMA-2L) - WHITE PAINT L.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - RIGHT TURN ARROW (PMA-2R) - WHITE PAINT M.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - PEDESTRIAN CROSSING (3'X8' WITH 3' GAP) - WHITE PAINT N.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - 4" WIDE SOLID (45 DEGREE ANGLE WITH 4' GAP), YELLOW PAINT O.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGN WITH DIRECTIONAL ARROW SIGN (30"X30", W11-2, AND W16-7P) SIGNAGE AND STRIPING KEY NOTES STORM BASIN 13 . 4 ' 13 . 9 ' RESIDENTIAL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRONS TO MEET CITY STANDARD PLATE STR-12 SITE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT SETBACK LINE (PER CODE) EXISTING CONDITIONS TRUNCATED DOMES EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY RESTORATION CURB AND GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER (TIP-OUT) SPLIT RAIL FENCE PARKING LOT POLE LIGHT RETAINING WALL PARKING SPACES PER ROW WETLAND DELINEATION LINE WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER & WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE M E A N D E R R D EXISTING GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE RES UNIT 1 RES UNIT 3 DAY CARE (CHILD CARE) 11,000 SF RES UNIT 2 RES UNIT 4 RESTAURANT 4,952 SF NORT H P L A Y AREA 6 5 0 0 S F PL A Y A R E A WEST PLAY AREA 3,800SF RETAIL 9,510 SF T TT T EV EV EV EV EV EV EVENT VENUE 15,600 SF BASEMENT (STORAGE / DATA) 15,600SF 13 LODGING UNITS (2ND/3RD FLOORS) 10,200 SF T TR E E * 7 8 TR E E * 2 8 TR E E * 2 9 TR E E * 3 3 TR E E * 6 2 TR E E * 6 1 TR E E * 6 0 TR E E * 5 9 TR E E * 5 8 TR E E * 5 7 >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> N 1.SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVAL PLAN, ALONG WITH ANY RELATED SURVEYS FOR DETAILS ON PROPERTY BACKGROUND INFORMATION. 2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON BUILDINGS, MONUMENT SIGNS, TRASH ENCLOSURES, AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS. VERIFY WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS THE EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, TRUCK DOCKS/SERVICE, AND OTHER RELATED BUILDING ITEMS. 3.SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING LOCATIONS, DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS. 4.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF CONCRETE, OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5.ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 5.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6.ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE CONCRETE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS, AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS, OR AS APPROVED. 8.BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, OR AS NOTED. PAVEMENT AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO ADHERE TO ALL AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSIBILITY, INCLUDING SLOPE. CONTACT ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY INVOLVING ANY DISCREPANCIES. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING. 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL SITE GOVERNMENTAL PERMITS AND FEES. 12.SEE SHEET C2.2 FOR MEANDER ROAD TYPICAL SECTION. SITE NOTES 1.ALL TRAFFIC SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD), OR AS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2.PARKING LOT STRIPING SHALL BE 4" WIDE COLOR WHITE, TWO COATS OF PAINT. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ANY/ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS AS SHOWN IN WHITE (TWO COATS). 3.ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNS AND MARKINGS PER LATEST ADA CODE AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY IN EACH DESIGNATED ACCESSIBLE STALL IN BLUE BACKGROUND WITH WHITE BORDER (TWO COATS OF PAINT). CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT THE WORDS "NO PARKING" IN EACH ACCESSIBLE ISLE ADJACENT TO AN ACCESSIBLE SPACE IN WHITE LETTERS MINIMUM 12" IN HEIGHT. SIGNS TO BE LOCATED AT THE HEAD OF THE PARKING SPACE. SEE ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAILS. 4.ALL SIGNS SHALL INCLUDE MOUNTING HARDWARE, POST, CONCRETE FOOTING AND CASING WHERE REQUIRED. CONCRETE CASING REQUIRED IN LOCATIONS WHERE POST IS NOT PROTECTED BY CURB. 5.IF NOTED, ALL STOP SIGNS SHALL INCLUDE A 12" WIDE PAINTED STOP BAR IN WHITE PAINT (TWO COATS) PLACED AT THE STOP SIGN LOCATION, A MINIMUM OF 4' FROM CROSSWALK. ALL STOP BARS SHALL EXTEND FROM DIRECTIONAL TRANSITION BETWEEN LANES TO THE CURB. 6.ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED 18" BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SIGNAGE AND STRIPING NOTES SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY PROPERTY ADDRESS / PID:1472 STATE HIGHWAY 55 (PID 0211823330003) MEDINA, MN 55340 PROPERTY AREA:825,599 S.F. (18.953 AC), EXCLUDES MEANDER ROAD EASEMENT (40,575 SF) 442,152 S.F. (10.150 AC) = NORTH PARCEL 383,447 S.F. (8.279 AC) = SOUTH PARCEL (W/ ADD. EAST PROPERTY) DEVELOPABLE PROPERTY AREA:340,631 S.F. (7.820 AC) = 41.3% (EXCLUDING WETLAND)70,214 S.F. (1.612 AC) = 15.9% NORTH PARCEL 270,417 S.F. (6.208 AC) = 79.4% SOUTH PARCEL DEVELOPABLE PROPERTY AREA:279,856 S.F. (6.424 AC) = 33.9% (EXCLUDING WETLAND & WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER)52,322 S.F. (1.201 AC) = 11.8% NORTH PARCEL 227,534 S.F. (5.223 AC) = 56.69% SOUTH PARCEL PROPERTY OWNER:R & J PARTNERSHIP OF MEDINA PROPERTY DEVELOPER:MEDINA VENTURE, LLC EXISTING ZONING:RR-UR (RURAL RESIDENTIAL URBAN RESERVE) = NORTH CH (COMMERCIAL HIGHWAY) = SOUTH PROPOSED ZONING:PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) BOTH NORTH AND SOUTH GUIDED R2 = NORTH GUIDED CH = SOUTH BUILDING SUMMARY: NORTH RESIDENTIAL (BLOCK 1, LOT 1-4):4 UNITS (2 DUPLEX), 2 LEVELS PLUS WALK OUT BASEMENT (1,944 S.F. FOOTPRINT OF EACH UNIT) SOUTH EVENT VENUE (BLOCK 2, LOT 1):15,600 S.F. =FIRST LEVEL, 15,600 S.F.=BASEMENT (STORAGE/DATA CENTER) SOUTH EVENT VENUE (BLOCK 2, LOT 1):13 LODGING UNITS (2ND AND 3RD FLOORS=10,200 S.F.) SOUTH DAY CARE (BLOCK 2, LOT 2):11,000 S.F. SOUTH RESTAURANT (BLOCK 2, LOT 3):4,952 S.F. SOUTH RETAIL (BLOCK 2, LOT 4):9,510 S.F. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) - REQUIRED:PER PUD FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) - PROVIDED:PER PUD BUILDING COVERAGE MAXIMUM:PER PUD BUILDING COVERAGE PROVIDED:5.9% (48,838 / 825,599) BUILDING SETBACKS:PER PUD PROJECT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - EXISTING:35,720 S.F. (0.82 AC), INCLUDING STREET / TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - PROPOSED:227,820 S.F. (5.23 AC), INCLUDING STREET / TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - INCREASE:192,100 S.F. (4.41 AC), INCLUDING STREET / TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS PARKING REQUIRED:PER PUD, SHARED PARKING PARKING PROVIDED:PER PUD, SHARED PARKING NORTH - RESIDENTIAL:10 SPACES (8 WITHIN GARAGES AND 2 VISTOR), EXCLUDING DRIVEWAY SOUTH - COMMERCIAL:249 SPACES (W/ 8 ACCESSIBLE) PARKING SIZE MIN. REQUIRED/PROVIDED:9' WIDE X 18' DEEP, 24' DRIVE AISLE (22' MIN.) PARKING SETBACK:PER PUD PARKING LANDSCAPE (COMMERCIAL ONLY):3,741 S.F. (3.97%) FOR 94,220 S.F. PERIMETER SITE PLAN OVERALL C2.0 SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 P. SCHROEDER 15295 N. SCHAUFENBUEL N. SCHAUFENBUEL P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25721 MICHAEL C. AARON 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE WETLAND CLASSIFICATION NORTH PARCEL PRESERVE SOUTH PARCEL MANAGE 2 UPLAND BUFFER ZONE AVERAGE WIDTH NORTH PARCEL 50 FEET (CITY ALLOWS 35 FEET) SOUTH PARCEL 25 FEET MINIMUM UPLAND BUFFER ZONE MINIMUM WIDTH NORTH PARCEL 30 FEET (CITY MAY ALLOW LESS) SOUTH PARCEL 20 FEET BUFFER SETBACK (PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE) NORTH PARCEL 15 FEET SOUTH PARCEL 15 FEET BUFFER SETBACK (ACCESSORY STRUCTURE) NORTH PARCEL 5 FEET SOUTH PARCEL 5 FEET WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER AREA 60,744 SF - EXISTING NORTH EXISTING 27,485 SF (35 FOOT AVERAGE) SOUTH EXISTING 33,259 SF (25 FOOT AVERAGE) WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER AREA 60,775 SF - PROPOSED (CROSS HATCHED AREA) NORTH PROPOSED 17,892 SF (20,295 SF SHOWN) SOUTH PROPOSED 42,883 SF PUD FLEXIBILITY NORTH PARCEL MINIMUM UPLAND BUFFER ZONE WIDTH (17 FEET MINIMUM AT DEVELOPMENT) NORTH PARCEL AREA REDUCTION WITH MITIGATION ON SOUTH PARCEL SOUTH PARCEL MINIMUM UPLAND BUFFER ZONE WIDTH (2 FEET MINIMUM AT LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE) WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15') WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER DELINEATED WETLAND LINE WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15') DELINEATED WETLAND LINE BLOCK 2 BLOCK 1 OUTLOT LOT 1LOT 2LOT 3LOT 4 LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 249 TOTAL PARKING SPACES (INCLUDING 8 ADA)10 TOTAL PARKING SPACES (INCLUDING 2 PER GARAGE AND 2 VISITOR) ELEVATED BOARDWALK ELEVATED BOARDWALK UPPER LEVEL DECK, LOWER LEVEL WALKOUT (TYP.) WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND MEANDER ROAD PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS - URBAN SECTION WITH CURB - WEST BOUND LEFT TURN LANE - LANE CENTER LINE RADIUS TO ACCOMMODATE 40 MPH SPEED (667' MIN.) - CITY TRAIL CROSSING 10' CITY BITUMINOUS TRAIL WITH 5' BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY WITH DEDICATED OUTBOUND LEFT AND RIGHT LANES RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY EXISTING FARMSTEAD RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY SITE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT SETBACK LINE (PER CODE) EXISTING CONDITIONS TRUNCATED DOMES EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY RESTORATION CURB AND GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER (TIP-OUT) ORNAMENTAL FENCE PARKING LOT POLE LIGHT RETAINING WALL PARKING SPACES PER ROW WETLAND DELINEATION LINE WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER & WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER SETBACK PUD FLEXIBILITY AT DEVELOPMENT, MIN. 25' AT GENERAL AREAS AND 17' AT RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH SPLIT RAIL FENCE AT BACKYARD PERIMETER (TYP.) WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER SETBACK PUD FLEXIBILITY AT LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE, MIN. 2' (TYP.) WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER DELINEATED WETLAND LINE WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER SUMMARY WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL 1 10-20-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE 2 11-04-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS 5 09-11-2023 CITY RESUBMIT FUTURE FREESTANDING DEVELOPMENT SIGN AREA PROPOSED PLAT NAME: MEANDER PROPOSED PARCEL INFO: PROPOSED PROPERTY WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL SETBACK (MIN.15') M E A N D E R R D HW Y 5 5 CAVANAUGH DRIVE EXISTING GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE LOT 1 BLOCK 1 LOT 2 BLOCK 1 LOT 3 BLOCK 1 LOT 4 BLOCK 1 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B ROW DEDICATION TOTAL 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 4,500 SF 42,256 SF 377,988 SF 3,908 SF 442,152 SF 0.103 ACRES 0.103 ACRES 0.103 ACRES 0.103 ACRES 0.970 ACRES 8.677 ACRES 0.090 ACRES 10.150 ACRES MEANDER - PLAT SUMMARY - NORTH LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA ACRES LOT 1 BLOCK 2 LOT 2 BLOCK 2 LOT 3 BLOCK 2 LOT 4 BLOCK 2 OUTLOT C ROW DEDICATION TOTAL 121,073 SF 34,331 SF 50,713 SF 41,000 SF 133,304 SF 3,011 SF 383,432 SF 2.780 ACRES 0.788 ACRES 1.164 ACRES 0.941 ACRES 3.060 ACRES 0.069 ACRES 8.802 ACRES MEANDER - PLAT SUMMARY - SOUTH LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA ACRES MEANDER ROAD EASEMENT TOTAL 40,575 SF 40,575 SF 0.931 ACRES 0.931 ACRES MEANDER - PLAT SUMMARY - EXISTING ROW LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA ACRES DAY CARE (CHILD CARE) 11,000 SF RESTAURANT 4,952 SF NORT H P L A Y AREA 6 5 0 0 S F PL A Y A R E A WEST PLAY AREA 3,800SF RETAIL 9,510 SF T TT T EV EV EV EV EV EV EVENT VENUE 15,600 SF BASEMENT (STORAGE / DATA) 15,600SF 13 LODGING UNITS (2ND/3RD FLOORS) 10,200 SF T TR E E * 2 8 TR E E * 2 9 TR E E * 3 3 TR E E * 6 2 TR E E * 6 1 TR E E * 6 0 TR E E * 5 9 TR E E * 5 8 TR E E * 5 7 >> >> S PE D C UN P / W A T E R V A L V E M A R K E R VL T C C F O PE D C E E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) F/O(UG)F/O(UG) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> > > G G G G F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) EX SAN MH RIM: 991.71 (RIM:991.42 PER PLAN) INV(N): 969.82 (PER PLAN) INV(S): 969.72 (PER PLAN) > EX SAN MH RIM: 1000.24 (RIM:1000.07 PER PLAN) INV(N): 971.37 (PER PLAN) INV(S): 971.27 (PER PLAN) EX SAN MH RIM: 1004.83 (RIM:1003.78 PER PLAN) INV(W): 973.28 (PER PLAN) INV(E): 981.38 (PER PLAN) INV(S): 972.98 (PER PLAN) S S S 8" PVC C900 SAN (PER PLAN)8" PVC C900 SAN (PER PLAN) N SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 P. SCHROEDER 15295 N. SCHAUFENBUEL N. SCHAUFENBUEL P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25721 MICHAEL C. AARON 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL SITE PLAN SOUTH C2.1 PLAY STRUCTURES AND FENCE PER DAY CARE PROVIDER 249 TOTAL PARKING SPACES (INCLUDING 8 ADA) TRASH ENCLOSURE TRASH ENCLOSURE TRASH ENCLOSURE TRASH ENCLOSURE LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE (BY OWNER) LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE (BY OWNER) ELEVATED BOARDWALK WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15') WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER DELINEATED WETLAND LINE ELEVATED BOARDWALK WETLAND 12'15.5'15.5' 15.5'15.5' EX. 12' EX. 12' LE F T T U R N L A N E LIMITS OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS LIMITS OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS EX. 15.5'EX. 12' EX. 15.5' EX. 15.5'EX. 15.5' EX. STREET RURAL SECTION WITH SHOULDER EX. STREET URBAN SECTION WITH CURB & GUTTER STRIPED MEDIAN STRIPED MEDIAN COMMERCIAL BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP AND CROSSWALK 10 ' B I T U M I N O U S T R A I L W / 5 ' B O U L E V A R D 6' CONCRETE SIDEWALK 8' CONCRETE SIDEWALKBASEMENT LIMITS BASEMENT SERVICE DOORS BASEMENT 10' CONCRETE SERVICE ROUTE (UNDER BOARDWALK) 12 ' 12 ' 12 ' 30 . 0 ' 8.0 ' 9.0 ' 24 . 0 ' 19 . 0 ' 19.0' 19.0' 24.0' 19.0' 19.0' 24.0' 19.0' 19.0' 24.0' 19.0' 19.0' 24.0' 19.0' 19.0' 24.0' 12' 16' 11 ' 21 . 9 ' 12.2' 49.6' 59.3' 49.6' 59.2' 75.0' 10.7' 10.0' 49.2' 88.8' 80.2' 84 . 5 ' 60 . 1 ' 60 . 0 ' 60 . 4 ' 73 . 4 ' 77 . 4 ' 61 . 4 ' 35 . 7 ' DELINEATED WETLAND LINE DELINEATED WETLAND LINE WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER SETBACK PUD FLEXIBILITY AT LANDSCAPE WATER FEATURE, MIN. 2' (TYP.) NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL 1 10-20-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE 2 11-04-2022 SUBM'T UPDATE 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS 5 09-11-2023 CITY RESUBMIT FUTURE FREESTANDING DEVELOPMENT SIGN AREA 34 . 3 ' FIRE LANE WITH SURMOUNTABLE CURB PLAY AREA FENCE ALONG MEANDER ROAD TO BE VEHICLE-RESISTANT ARCHITECTURAL PATIO WALL SIGNAGE AND STRIPING KEY NOTES A.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - STOP SIGN (30"X30", R1-1) B.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - NO PARKING FIRE LANE (12"X18", R7) C.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - ADA PARKING SIGN (12"X18", R7-8M) WITH VAN ACCESSIBLE (6"X12", R7-8bP) D.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - DUAL TURN LANE ONLY OPPOSITE (36"X30", R3-8aa) E.ENVIRO SIGNAGE - WETLAND BUFFER (TBD) F.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - 4" WIDE SOLID - WHITE PAINT G.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - 4" WIDE SOLID - YELLOW PAINT H.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - DOUBLE 4" WIDE SOLID WITH 4" GAP - YELLOW PAINT I.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - DOUBLE 4" WIDE SOLID OUTSIDE, DASHED INSIDE (10' W/ 40' GAP) WITH 4" GAP - YELLOW PAINT J.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - ADA SYMBOL AND NO PARKING ACCESS AISLE - WHITE PAINT K.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - LEFT TURN ARROW (PMA-2L) - WHITE PAINT L.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - RIGHT TURN ARROW (PMA-2R) - WHITE PAINT M.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - PEDESTRIAN CROSSING (3'X8' WITH 3' GAP) - WHITE PAINT N.PAVEMENT MARKINGS - 4" WIDE SOLID (45 DEGREE ANGLE WITH 4' GAP), YELLOW PAINT O.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGN WITH DIRECTIONAL ARROW SIGN (30"X30", W11-2, AND W16-7P)STORM BASIN 14 7 . 0 ' WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MIN. 15') SITE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT SETBACK LINE (PER CODE) EXISTING CONDITIONS TRUNCATED DOMES EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY RESTORATION CURB AND GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER (TIP-OUT) ORNAMENTAL FENCE PARKING LOT POLE LIGHT RETAINING WALL PARKING SPACES PER ROW WETLAND DELINEATION LINE WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER & WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FENCE TO BE 2' CLEAR OF FIRE LANE PAVEMENT M E A N D E R R D HW Y 5 5 CAVANAUGH DRIVE EXISTING GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE D R I V E 15.5' 12 . 0 ' 9' 8' 8' 8' 8' 8' 8' ELECTRICAL VEHICLE CHARGING STATION AND PARKING (TYP.), 6 SPACES SOLAR CARPORTS AND STRUCTURAL FOOTING (TYP.) - 3 DUAL PARKING ROWS ADDITIONAL PROPERTY - 34' CORRIDOR ON EAST PROPERTY LINE FROM HIGHWAY 55 TO MEANDER ROAD RES UNIT 1 RES UNIT 3 DAY CARE (CHILD CARE) 11,000 SF RES UNIT 2 RES UNIT 4 RESTAURANT 4,952 SF NORT H P L A Y AREA 6 5 0 0 S F PL A Y A R E A WEST PLAY AREA 3,800SF RETAIL 9,510 SF T TT T EV EV EV EV EV EV EVENT VENUE 15,600 SF BASEMENT (STORAGE / DATA) 15,600SF 13 LODGING UNITS (2ND/3RD FLOORS) 10,200 SF T TR E E * 7 8 TR E E * 2 8 TR E E * 2 9 TR E E * 3 3 TR E E * 6 2 TR E E * 6 1 TR E E * 6 0 TR E E * 5 9 TR E E * 5 8 TR E E * 5 7 >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> S PE D C VL T C C F O PE D C E E( U G ) E( U G ) F/O(UG) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > >> >> G G F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) S S S 12 " P V C W A T ( P E R P L A N ) 10" PV C W A T (PER P L A N ) 12 " P V C W A T ( P E R P L A N ) 99 699 5 99 4 99 3 992 99199098998 8 98 8 98 999 0 99 1 99 2 99 3 99 4 99 1 99 0 98 9 994 99 3 992 991 990 989 988 988 987 986 985 98 4 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 100 2 100 3 10 0 0 99 9 998 997 996 995 994 993 992 991 990 989 988 987 986 985 984 983 982 98 5 98 4 98 3 98 4 98 3 99 699 5 99 4 99 3 992 99199098998 8 98 8 98 999 0 99 1 99 2 99 3 99 4 99 1 99 0 98 9 994 99 3 992 991 990 989 988 988 987 986 985 98 4 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 100 2 100 3 10 0 0 99 9 998 997 996 995 994 993 992 991 990 989 988 987 986 985 984 983 982 98 5 98 4 98 3 98 4 98 3 996 997 99 8 99 5 99 2 99 0 995 994 993 992991990 996997998 1000 998999 98 5 98 698 798 8 98 999 099 199 2 995 990 986988989990 985 984 990 992 994 996 998 1000 988 986 98 5 987 990992993992 99199 0 990 998 997 999 991 992 991 991 999999999999999999999 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 999999999 9999 999 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 PIV PIV PIV PIV N 1.THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-2, ENTITLED “STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA.” 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 3.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL WORK AND MATERIALS FOR GRADING, SUBSOIL CORRECTIONS (IMPORT/EXPORT), RETAINING WALLS, TOPSOIL, EROSION CONTROL AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS. 4.SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 6.ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. STRIP, STOCKPILE, AND REDISTRIBUTE EXISTING TOPSOIL, AS SUITABLE. 7.FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT WALL GRADE TRANSITION, AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 8.STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 9.DUST SHALL BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 10.ALL SLOPES 1:3 (V:H) OR GREATER REQUIRED TO RECEIVE SURFACE EROSION CONTROL WHETHER IT IS INDICATED ON THE PLAN OR NOT: MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES. 11.ALL STORM DRAINS AND INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED UNTIL ALL SOURCES OF POTENTIAL DISCHARGE ARE STABILIZED. 12.TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL AND CAN NOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS OR STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SILT, CLAY, OR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ARE EXEMPT EX: CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCK PILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES. 13.FINAL STABILIZATION REQUIRES THAT ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND THAT DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH 70% OF THE EXPECTED FINAL DENSITY, AND THAT ALL PERMANENT PAVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. ALL TEMPORARY BMP'S SHALL BE REMOVED, DITCHES STABILIZED, AND SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PERMANENT CONVEYANCES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS IN ORDER TO RETURN THE POND/BASIN TO DESIGN CAPACITY. 14.THE WATERSHED DISTRICT OR THE CITY MAY HAVE REQUIREMENTS FOR INSPECTIONS VERIFYING PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF THE BEST MANAGMENT PRACTICES (BMP) - THE MORE RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY. 15.SEE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NOTES AND DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL PERMITS/FEES, INSPECTORS, INSPECTIONS, AND DOCUMENTATION. PLAN REPRESENTS MINIMAL EROSION CONTROL, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MEANS AND METHODS FOR THE PROJECT AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE. 16.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL SUBGRADE SOIL CORRECTIONS, INCLUDING REMOVAL OF SUBGRADE DEBRIS, FOR PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS BUILDING, PAVEMENT, UTILITY, RETAINING WALLS, AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS. REFER TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ANY ADDITIONAL SITE PREPARATION INFORMATION OR REQUIREMENTS. 17.IF GROUND WATER IS PRESENT IN THE EXCAVATION, OR IF THE EXPOSED SOILS ARE WET AND UNSTABLE, CONTACT THE OWNER OR ENGINEER FOR A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 18.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO COMMENCING GRADING ACTIVITIES AND SHALL MAINTAIN SAID MEASURES FOR DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND DISPOSE OF OFF SITE. 19.CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT DIRT AND/OR DEBRIS FROM ENTERING STORM SEWER OR BEING TRANSPORTED OFF SITE IN AN UNCONTROLLED MANOR. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AT PROJECT CLOSEOUT THAT STORM SEWER SYSTEM IS CLEAR OF SEDIMENT AND/OR DEBRIS AND IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL. 20.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL MONITORING, PER REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION, TO INSPECT AND DOCUMENT ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY (EVERY 7 DAYS) AND AFTER EVERY 0.5 INCH RAINFALL EVENT, PER REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CORRECTIVE MEASURES IMMEDIATELY FOR ANY NON-COMPLIANCE OBSERVATIONS. 21.ALL DISTURBED NON-PAVED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE TEMPORARY PROTECTION OR PERMANENT COVER WITHIN 14 DAYS OF DISTURBANCE OPERATIONS. 22.WHEN TRAPPED SEDIMENT REACHES 1/3 OF THE HEIGHT OF SILT FENCE, IT SHALL BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR. 23.CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT FILTER SACKS SHALL BE CLEANED WHEN SEDIMENT REACHES 1/3 THE CAPACITY OF THE SACK. 24.WHEN SEDIMENT IS TRACKED ON TO PAVED SURFACES, IT SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. 25.ANY SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE THAT ACCUMULATES ON OR OFF THE OWNER'S PROPERTY SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS/HER EXPENSE. ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURS FROM THE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT OR FROM THE CONTRACTOR'S REMOVAL OF THE SEDIMENT, SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS/HER EXPENSE. 26.ALL EXCAVATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF OSHA 29 CFR, PART 1926, SUBPART P, “EXCAVATIONS AND TRENCHES.” THIS DOCUMENT STATES THAT EXCAVATION SAFETY IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 27.THE CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT SPECIFIC STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN. TEMPORARY STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UNTIL THE PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS ARE ESTABLISHED. CONTRACTOR TO DESIGN AND SUBMIT ALL TEMPORARY STORMWATER ITEMS FOR ENGINEER APPROVAL. 28.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL SURVEY CONSTRUCTION STAKING. 29.SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS FOR EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TYPE AND PLACEMENT LOCATION. 30.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND INSTALL ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 70 FOR POND EMERGENCY OVERFLOWS. 20.COORDINATE STORMWATER REUSE WITH IRRIGATION SYSTEM. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN BUILD BY IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES GRADING, DRAINAGE, & EROSION CONTROL PLAN OVERALL C4.0 SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS 5 09-11-2023 CITY RESUBMIT M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 15295 N. SCHAUFENBUEL N. SCHAUFENBUEL P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25721 MICHAEL C. AARON 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL WETLAND DELINEATION LINE WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MINIMUM 15') WETLAND DELINEATION LINE WETLAND AVERAGE UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK (MINIMUM 15') FLOODPLAIN FILL VOLUME 210 CY COMPENSATORY FLOODPLAIN FILL VOLUME PROVIDED 230 CY TOTAL WETLAND IMPACT AREA 5,415 SF (TEMP=1,504 SF, PERM= 3,911 SF) FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION 986.0 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL LEGEND PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED CONTOURS (MAJOR) PROPOSED CONTOURS (MINOR) EXISTING CONTOURS (MAJOR) EXISTING CONTOURS (MINOR) PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION FLOW LINE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE TC = TOP OF CURB D = DECK/BOARDWALK FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION HP/LP = HIGH/LOW POINT ± = MATCH EXISTING, FIELD VERIFY BW/TW = FINISHED GRADE AT LOW/HIGH SIDE OF WALL (DOES NOT INCLUDE BURIED WALL OR CAP) SI = STORM INLET RIM EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PROPOSED SURFACE SLOPE SILT FENCE BIO ROLL INLET PROTECTION ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE RIP-RAP STORM SEWER (SEE UTILITY PLAN) DRAIN TILE (SEE UTILITY PLAN) RETAINING WALL TIP-OUT GUTTER LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FLOODPLAIN FILL AREA FLOODPLAIN COMPENSATORY STORAGE WETLAND IMPACT AREA 9 9 9 9NORTHERN WETLAND IMPACT AREA 3,016 SF (3,016 SF PERMANENT) SOUTHERN WETLAND IMPACT AREA 2,399 SF (1,504 SF TEMPORARY, 895 SF PERMANENT) ELEVATED BOARDWALK ELEVATED DECK MINIMUM EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES SILT FENCE 2,385 LF BIO ROLL 2,627 LF INLET PROTECTION 18 EA RIP-RAP 56 CY ROLLED EROSION PREV. 52 SY PRODUCT CAT. 70 M E A N D E R R D HW Y 5 5 CAVANAUGH DRIVE EXISTING GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE TR E E * 7 8 TR E E * 2 8 TR E E * 2 9 TR E E * 3 3 TR E E * 6 2 TR E E * 6 1 TR E E * 6 0 TR E E * 5 9 TR E E * 5 8 TR E E * 5 7 >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> RES UNIT 1 RES UNIT 3 DAY CARE (CHILD CARE) 11,000 SF RES UNIT 2 RES UNIT 4 RESTAURANT 4,952 SF NORT H P L A Y AREA 6 5 0 0 S F PL A Y A R E A WEST PLAY AREA 3,800SF RETAIL 9,510 SF T TT T EV EV EV EV EV EV EVENT VENUE 15,600 SF BASEMENT (STORAGE / DATA) 15,600SF 13 LODGING UNITS (2ND/3RD FLOORS) 10,200 SF T S PE D C VL T C C F O PE D C E E( U G ) E( U G ) F/O(UG) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > >> >> G G F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) EX SAN MH RIM: 991.71 (RIM:991.42 PER PLAN) INV(N): 969.82 (PER PLAN) INV(S): 969.72 (PER PLAN) > EX SAN MH RIM: 1000.24 (RIM:1000.07 PER PLAN) INV(N): 971.37 (PER PLAN) INV(S): 971.27 (PER PLAN) EX SAN MH RIM: 1004.83 (RIM:1003.78 PER PLAN) INV(W): 973.28 (PER PLAN) INV(E): 981.38 (PER PLAN) INV(S): 972.98 (PER PLAN) S S S 8" PVC C900 SAN (PER PLAN)8" PVC C900 SAN (PER PLAN) 12 " P V C W A T ( P E R P L A N ) 10" PV C W A T (PER P L A N ) 12 " P V C W A T ( P E R P L A N ) PIV PIV PIV PIV N UTILITY NOTES UTILITY PLAN OVERALL C5.0 UTILITY LEGEND PROPERTY LINE STORM SEWER DRAIN TILE SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN ELECTRIC (BURIED) ELECTRIC (OVERHEAD) TELEPHONE (BURIED) TELEPHONE (OVERHEAD) TELEVISION (BURIED) TELEVISION (OVERHEAD) FIBER OPTIC (BURIED) FIBER OPTIC (OVERHEAD) COMMUNICATION (UNDEFINED) NATURAL GAS LINE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS STORM MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN STORM FLARED END SECTION CLEAN OUT (CO) SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE 1.THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-2, ENTITLED “STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA.” 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL UTILITY LOCATES. CONTACT GOPHER SATE ONE CALL PER STATE STATUTES FOR PUBLIC UTILITY LOCATES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST HIRE A PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATING SERVICE TO LOCATE PRIVATE UTILITIES IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 3.SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR SURVEY INFORMATION. THE ENGINEER CAN NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR INACCURACIES RELATED TO THE SURVEY INFORMATION. 4.COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY MATERIALS, INSTALLATION, AND TESTING. 5.OBTAIN ALL PERMITS OR APPROVALS FROM LOCAL UTILITY OWNERS PRIOR TO BEGINNING UTILITY INSTALLATIONS. NOTIFY UTILITY OWNERS OF THE START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PROJECT AND ANY SPECIFIC UTILITY WORK AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE. 6.FIELD VERIFY AND COORDINATE ALL BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTIONS AND PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING LOCATION, TYPE, SIZE, AND INVERT ELEVATION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES FROM THE PLAN FOR RESOLUTION PRIOR TO BEGINNING UTILITY INSTALLATIONS. 7.ADJUST, OR ARRANGE TO BE ADJUSTED BY UTILITY OWNER, ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED. COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET IN PAVED AREAS TO MEET OWNER'S REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 8.SERVICE UTILITIES, SUCH AS ELECTRIC (TRANSFORMER), GAS, TELEPHONE, CABLE, FIBER OPTIC, AND OTHER RELATED SMALL UTILITIES, MAY BE SHOWN FOR GENERAL REFERENCE AND ARE DEEMED CONCEPTUAL LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING AND COORDINATING ALL LOCATIONS OF SERVICE UTILITY CONNECTIONS AND RELATED ITEMS WITH SERVICE PROVIDERS. 9.WATERMAIN AND WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO BE C900 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC), UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. MAINTAIN 7.5' OF COVER ON ALL NEW WATERMAIN, PROVIDE WATERMAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS AT CHANGE OF DIRECTION, AND PROVIDE 18" SEPARATION BETWEEN SEWER PIPE. ADJUST WATERMAIN VERTICALLY, AS NECESSARY, AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. IF INSULATION IS REQUIRED, PROVIDE DOW STYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, AT 4-INCH THICKNESS. RESIDENTIAL WATER SERVICE TO BE 1" HIGH DENSITY POLY ETHYLENE (HDPE). COMMERCIAL WATER SERVICE (DOMESTIC AND FIRE) TO BE SCHEDULE 40 POLY VINYL CHLORIDE, SIZE AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. 10.WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY ENGINEER'S ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM) STANDARDS OR THE CITY'S WATERMAIN INSTALLATION STANDARDS. WHERE CONFLICTS OCCUR, THE MORE RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENT SHALL GOVERN. 11.SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SDR35 OR 26. SDR 26 REQUIRED FOR DEPTHS GREATER THAN 15 FEET. 12.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP), WITH R-4 GASKETS. RCP CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18" OR SMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" AND LARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC) TO BE SCHEDULE 40. IF ALLOWED BY THE CITY, HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE) SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2648. PIPE SHALL BE WATER TIGHT ACCORDING TO ASTM D3212 REQUIREMENTS. FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL BE RCP WITH TRASH GUARDS AND ROCK RIP-RAP. 13.OUTSIDE OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, INLET AND OUTLET CONNECTIONS TO SEWER STRUCTURES SHALL USE APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. 14.ALL MANHOLE COVERS TO BE STAMPED EITHER SANITARY OR STORM SEWER. 15.PIPE LENGTHS THAT MAY BE SHOWN ARE HORIZONTALLY FROM CENTER OF STRUCTURE TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE. 16.SITE UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5 FEET FROM BUILDING, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 17.ALL EXCAVATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF OSHA 29 CFR, PART 1926, SUBPART P, “EXCAVATIONS AND TRENCHES.” THIS DOCUMENT STATES THAT EXCAVATION SAFETY IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 18.DRAINTILE LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AS ILLUSTRATED. FIELD VERIFY FINAL LOCATIONS. 19.AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS-BUILT RECORD OF UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. THE AS-BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST-CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED. 20.COORDINATE STORMWATER REUSE WITH IRRIGATION SYSTEM. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN BUILD BY IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR. SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS 5 09-11-2023 CITY RESUBMIT M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 P. SCHROEDER 15295 N. SCHAUFENBUEL N. SCHAUFENBUEL P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25721 MICHAEL C. AARON 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL CITY OF MEDINA GENERAL UTILITY NOTES A.THE CITY SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS INCURRED THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH VARIATIONS IN THE UTILITY AS-BUILT ELEVATIONS. ALL UTILITY CONNECTIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD. B.THE CITY, OR AGENTS OF THE CITY, ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ERRORS AND OMISSIONS ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS. THE OWNER AND ENGINEER OF RECORD ARE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MEET THE CITY'S STANDARDS. C.ALL WATERMAIN AND SANITARY SEWER TESTING SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. COPIES OF ALL TEST RESULTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY (PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, CITY ENGINEER), THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. D.WATERMAIN SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 7.5'. E.TRACER WIRE INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION STANDARDS. SEE THESE STANDARDS FOR FURTHER DETAILS. F.THE CITY WILL REQUIRE TELEVISING FOR SANITARY SEWER PIPE INSTALLATIONS PRIOR TO ACCEPTING A WARRANTY FOR THE UTILITY SYSTEM; PROVIDE REPORT AND VIDEO FILES TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW. M E A N D E R R D HW Y 5 5 CAVANAUGH DRIVE EXISTING GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE TR E E * 7 8 TR E E * 2 8 TR E E * 2 9 TR E E * 3 3 TR E E * 6 2 TR E E * 6 1 TR E E * 6 0 TR E E * 5 9 TR E E * 5 8 TR E E * 5 7 >> RES UNIT 1 RES UNIT 3 DAY CARE (CHILD CARE) 11,000 SF RES UNIT 2 RES UNIT 4 RESTAURANT 4,952 SF NORT H P L A Y AREA 6 5 0 0 S F PL A Y A R E A WEST PLAY AREA 3,800SF RETAIL 9,510 SF T TT T EV EV EV EV EV EV EVENT VENUE 15,600 SF BASEMENT (STORAGE / DATA) 15,600SF 13 LODGING UNITS (2ND/3RD FLOORS) 10,200 SF T S G G L G L - PE D C TF O B + TF O B TF O B TF O B TF O B - UN P / W A T E R V A L V E M A R K E R VL T C C F O PE D C E E( U G ) E( U G ) F/O(UG) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > >> >> G G F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) S S S PIV PIV PIV PIV FD C FDC FDC FDC HIG H W A Y 5 5 CAVANAUGH DRIVE PRIVATE DRIVE M E A N D E R R O A D PRIVATE DRIVE EX.GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVE CONIFEROUS TREES COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA`BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6` HT.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 18 DECIDUOUS TREES COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY ACER RUBRUM `NORTHWOOD`NORTHWOOD MAPLE 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 5 ACER X FREEMANII 'ARMSTRONG'ARMSTRONG FREEMAN MAPLE 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 10 ACER X FREEMANII 'JEFFERSRED'AUTUMN BLAZE® FREEMAN MAPLE 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 5 BETULA NIGRA `CULLY` TM HERITAGE RIVER BIRCH 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 6 CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS COMMON HACKBERRY 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 7 GINKGO BILOBA `AUTUMN GOLD` TM AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 3 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS `HARVE`NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUST 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 3 QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAK 2.5" CAL.CONT.SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 7 QUERCUS X MACDANIELLI `CLEMONS` TM HERITAGE OAK 2.5" CAL.CONT.SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 4 SALIX ALBA `TRISTIS`GOLDEN WEEPING WILLOW 1.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 10 ULMUS DAVIDIANA JAPONICA `DISCOVERY`DISCOVERY ELM 2.5" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 8 ORNAMENTAL TREE COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY MALUS X `SPRING SNOW`SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE 2" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 13 MALUS X 'PINK SPIRES'PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE 2" CAL.B&B SINGLE, STRAIGHT LEADER 12 SHRUBS COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY CORNUS STOLONIFERA `FARROW`ARCTIC FIRE RED TWIG DOGWOOD #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.27 COTONEASTER LUCIDUS HEDGE COTONEASTER #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.14 JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS 'MINT JULEP'MINT JULEP JUNIPER #5 CONT.PLANT 5` O.C.9 RIBES ALPINUM ALPINE CURRANT #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.61 SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 'ANTHONY WATERER'ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA #5 CONT.PLANT 4` O.C.109 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'HOLMSTRUP'HOLMSTRUP ARBORVITAE #5 CONT.PLANT 5` O.C.4 PERENNIALS AND GRASSES COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER REMARKS QTY CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT.PLANT 3` O.C.309 HEMEROCALLIS X `STELLA SUPREME`STELLA SUPREME DAYLILY #1 CONT.PLANT 18" O.C.598 NEPETA X `WALKER`S LOW`WALKER`S LOW CATMINT #1 CONT.PLANT 24" O.C.53 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM`GOLDSTRUM BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT.PLANT 18" O.C.48 SALVIA X SYLVESTRIS `MAY NIGHT`MAY NIGHT SAGE #1 CONT.PLANT 18" O.C.89 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT.PLANT 24" O.C.105 N LANDSCAPE NOTES LANDSCAPE PLAN - OVERALL L1.0 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS 5 09-11-2023 CITY RESUBMIT M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 15295 J. FILLMORE J. FILLMORE P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25820 PAUL D. SCHROEDER 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL LANDSCAPE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE SHRUBS/PERENNIALS ROCK MULCH SOD MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST (MNDOT SEED MIX 35-641) WITH WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST (MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261) WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES WETLAND BUFFER EXISTING TREE/SHRUBS TO REMAIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LANDSCAPE EDGER LIMITS OF IRRIGATION (NOT SHOWN) 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL 2.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SOIL CONDITIONS. 3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4.COORDINATE ALL LANDSCAPE WORK WITH APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL. 5.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHlTECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 7.ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: -ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. -ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. -ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFlNG. -CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 8.PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 9.PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 10.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 11.PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 12.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON B&B MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 13.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 14.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 15.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 16.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 17.TOPSOIL (AND PLANTING SOIL) TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW), AND TO BE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS (LARGER THAN ONE INCH), SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS, UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. UTILIZE EXISTING ON-SITE TOPSOIL AS APPROPRIATE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL (PLANTING SOIL) FOR TREE, SHRUBS. AND PERENNIALS. 18.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, LANDSCAPE BED, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS, OR AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE A MINIMUM 4-INCH DEPTH, RED COLORED (OR AS DIRECTED), AND FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE A MINIMUM 3-INCH DEPTH, BUFF LIMESTONE (OR AS DIRECTED), AND 1.5-INCH TO 3-INCH DIAMETER. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WlTH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 19.EDGING TO BE PROVIDED BETWEEN MULCH AND LAWN TURF AREAS, OR AS INDICATED. STEEL EDGING BETWEEN LANDSCAPE BEDS AND LAWN TURF AREAS TO BE COMMERCIAL BLACK STEEL EDGING, INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION GUIDELINES. BLACK STEEL EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH CONNECTORS AND METAL STAKES NO GREATER THAN 4-FOOT ON CENTER AND ELEVATION BELOW LAWN MOWER CUT LINE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. INDIVIDUAL TREE AND SHRUB AREAS TO BE SPADED EDGE BETWEEN MULCH AND LAWN TURF GRASS AREAS WITH V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION. 20.All DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND/OR HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. SEED MIX AND APPLICATION RATE AS SPECIFIED PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS, OR AS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR RESEED ANY DAMAGED OR UNESTABLISHED AREAS UNTIL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE AND COMPLETION OF WARRANTY. 21.PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ON SlTE, OR AS COORDINATED. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PLANS, CALCULATIONS, AND SHOP DRAWINGS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. COORDINATE ALL IRRIGATION PIPES, WIRING, SLEEVING, AND OTHER COMPONENTS WITH OTHER PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS. 22.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 23.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND PLANT SCHEDULE TR E E * 2 8 TR E E * 2 9 TR E E * 3 3 TR E E * 6 2 TR E E * 6 1 TR E E * 6 0 TR E E * 5 9 TR E E * 5 8 TR E E * 5 7 >> >> DAY CARE (CHILD CARE) 11,000 SF RESTAURANT 4,952 SF NORT H P L A Y AREA 6 5 0 0 S F PL A Y A R E A WEST PLAY AREA 3,800SF RETAIL 9,510 SF T TT T EV EV EV EV EV EV EVENT VENUE 15,600 SF BASEMENT (STORAGE / DATA) 15,600SF 13 LODGING UNITS (2ND/3RD FLOORS) 10,200 SF T S G G L G L - PE D C TF O B + TF O B TF O B TF O B TF O B - UN P / W A T E R V A L V E M A R K E R E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) F/O(UG)F/O(UG) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > > G G G G F/O(U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) F/ O ( U G ) S S PIV PIV PIV PIV FD C FDC FDC FDC (7) BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (4) HERITAGE OAK (3) AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO (3) COMMON HACKBERRY (4) COMMON HACKBERRY (4) SWAMP WHITE OAK (3) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE (3) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE (3) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE (3) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE (3) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE (3) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE (3) PINK SPIRES CRABAPPLE (4) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE (3) AUTUMN BLAZE® FREEMAN MAPLE (3) NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUST (2) GOLDEN WEEPING WILLOW (8) GOLDEN WEEPING WILLOW (10) ARMSTRONG FREEMAN MAPLE (2) DISCOVERY ELM (3) DISCOVERY ELM (3) DISCOVERY ELM (8) BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (3) BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (2) DISCOVERY ELM HIG H W A Y 5 5 M E A N D E R R O A D PRIVATE DRIVE N LANDSCAPE PLAN - SOUTH L1.1 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS 5 09-11-2023 CITY RESUBMIT M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 15295 J. FILLMORE J. FILLMORE P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25820 PAUL D. SCHROEDER 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL LANDSCAPE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE SHRUBS/PERENNIALS ROCK MULCH SOD MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST (MNDOT SEED MIX 35-641) WITH WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST (MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261) WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES WETLAND BUFFER EXISTING TREE/SHRUBS TO REMAIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LANDSCAPE EDGER LIMITS OF IRRIGATION (NOT SHOWN) SOUTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE SUMMARY MINIMUM NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS REQUIRED ·SOUTH PARCEL LOT PERIMETER = 2,525 ·1 SHADE TREE PER 50 LF LOT PERIMETER = 51 REQUIRED ·1 ORNAMENTAL TREE PER 100 LF LOT PERIMETER = 26 REQUIRED ·1 SHRUB PER 30 LF LOT PERIMETER = 85 REQUIRED PROPOSED NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS ·EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED AND CREDITED TOWARD THE MINIMUM REQUIRED TREES ON A SITE = 8 ·PROPOSED SHADE TREE = 50 ·PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE = 26 ·TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED TREES = EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED + PROPOSED TREES = 58 TREES ·PROPOSED SHRUBS = 174 ·PROPOSED PERENNIALS = 1,045 WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND ALL EXISTING VEGETATION DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN THE WETLAND BUFFER TO BE RESTORED WITH MESIC PRAIRIE SEED MIX APPROXIMATE IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONTROLS AND WATER SUPPLY (REUSE ROOF WATER CISTERN AND SUPPLEMENTAL WELL) OVERHEAD UTILITIES STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST SEED MIX WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SOD SYNTHETIC TURF ARCHITECTURAL PATIO AREA TREES TO BE PLANTED 10' MINIMUM FROM BACK OF CURB WELL NOTE SEE SHEET L1.3, L1.4, AND L1.5 FOR SHRUB AND PERENNIAL BED PLANTING LAYOUT ROCK MULCH AND WEED BARRIER FABRIC BELOW BOARDWALK DECK, TYP. TR E E * 7 8 RES UNIT 1 RES UNIT 3 DAY CARE (CHILD CARE) 11,000 SF RES UNIT 2 RES UNIT 4 NORT H P L A Y AREA 6 5 0 0 S F PL A Y A R E A WEST PLAY AREA 3,800SF T G G L G L - TF O B + TF O B TF O B TF O B TF O B - UN P / W A T E R V A L V E M A R K E R E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) E( U G ) F/O(UG)F/O(UG) > >>>>> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | > G G G G S (7) BLACK HILLS SPRUCE (3) HERITAGE RIVER BIRCH (3) SWAMP WHITE OAK (3) NORTHWOOD MAPLE (1) NORTHWOOD MAPLE (3) COMMON HACKBERRY (4) COMMON HACKBERRY (1) NORTHWOOD MAPLE (3) HERITAGE RIVER BIRCH (4) SPRING SNOW CRAB APPLE (3) AUTUMN BLAZE® FREEMAN MAPLE (3) NORTHERN ACCLAIM HONEYLOCUST (10) ARMSTRONG FREEMAN MAPLE (8) BLACK HILLS SPRUCE PRIVATE DRIVE M E A N D E R R O A D PRIVATE DRIVE EX.GRAVEL PRIVATE DRIVE NORTH PARCEL LANDSCAPE SUMMARY MINIMUM NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS REQUIRED ·4 TREES PER UNIT (16 TOTAL) ·0.2 OPACITY BUFFER YARD TO EAST AND WEST ·NO SHRUBS OR PERENNIALS REQUIRED PROPOSED NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS ·EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED AND CREDITED TOWARD THE MINIMUM REQUIRED TREES ON A SITE = 1 ·SHADE TREE/EVERGREEN TREES = 24 ·TOTAL NUMBER OF PROPOSED TREES = EXISTING TREES TO BE SAVED + PROPOSED TREES = 25 TREES ·PROPOSED SHRUBS = 64 ·PROPOSED PERENNIALS = 191 PROPOSED EAST BUFFER YARD CALCULATION ·BUFFER YARD WIDTH = 5' ·BUFFER YARD LENGTH = 225' ·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER 100 LF = 84 ·BUFFER YARD POINTS REQUIRED = 225100 = 2.25*84 = 189 ·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER 'TALL DECIDUOUS SHRUB' = 5 ·TOTAL NUMBER OF BUFFER YARD POINTS = 113*5 = 565 PROPOSED WEST BUFFER YARD CALCULATION ·BUFFER YARD WIDTH = VARIES, ASSUME 15' ·BUFFER YARD LENGTH = 240' ·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER 100 LF = 198 ·BUFFER YARD POINTS REQUIRED = 240100 = 2.40*198 = 476 ·BUFFER YARD POINTS PER '2.5" CAL OVERSTORY TREE' = 50 ·TOTAL NUMBER OF BUFFER YARD POINTS = 10*50 = 500 N LANDSCAPE PLAN - NORTH L1.2 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. SHEET SHEET TITLE PROJECT INFO DRAWN: DESIGNED: CHECKED: PROJECT NO: ISSUE RECORD Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: Print Name: CERTIFICATION Signature Name: Date:Lic. No.: PREPARED FOR PROJECT Print Name: 3 02-10-2023 CITY RESUBMIT 4 04-04-2023 CITY COMMENTS 5 09-11-2023 CITY RESUBMIT M E A N D E R P A R K & BO A R D W A L K D E V E L O P M E N T 14 7 2 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 5 5 , M E D I N A , M N 5 5 3 4 0 15295 J. FILLMORE J. FILLMORE P. SCHROEDER XXXXX 25820 PAUL D. SCHROEDER 3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791 PH: 763-475-0010 www.srfconsulting.com NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 0 09-09-2022 CITY SUBMITTAL LANDSCAPE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE SHRUBS/PERENNIALS ROCK MULCH SOD MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST (MNDOT SEED MIX 35-641) WITH WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST (MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261) WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES WETLAND BUFFER EXISTING TREE/SHRUBS TO REMAIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LANDSCAPE EDGER LIMITS OF IRRIGATION (NOT SHOWN) EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIESPROPERTY LINE STORMWATER SOUTH & WEST SEED MIX WITH CATEGORY 10 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON BOTTOM OF BASIN AND CATEGORY 20 ON SIDE SLOPES MESIC PRAIRIE SOUTHEAST SEED MIX WITH CATEGORY 20 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ALL EXISTING VEGETATION DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN THE WETLAND BUFFER TO BE RESTORED WITH MESIC PRAIRIE SEED MIX SEE SHEET L1.4 FOR SHRUB AND PERENNIAL BED PLANTING LAYOUT WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER WETLAND SOD SEE SHEET L1.4 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TREES TO BE PLANTED 10' MINIMUM FROM BACK OF CURB 2' WIDE SOD STRIP, TYP.NOTE SEE SHEET L1.4 FOR SHRUB AND PERENNIAL BED PLANTING LAYOUT ALL EXISTING VEGETATION DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES OUTSIDE WETLAND BUFFER TO BE RESTORED WITH SOD. SPLIT RAIL FENCE. SOD EDGE 1' OFF FENCE. T T T NO PAR K I N G NO PA R K I N G NO PA R K I N G NO PAR K I N G EV EV EV EV EV EV RETAIL 9,600 SF RESTAURANT 4,800 SF CHILD CARE 11,000 SF LEVEL 1&2 LODGING 10,200 SF MAIN LEVEL VENUE 15,600 BASEMENT 15,600 SF PR I V A T E D R I V E RES UNIT 4 2900 SF RES UNIT 3 2900 SF RES UNIT 2 2900 SF RES UNIT 1 2900 SF WATE R F E A T U R E BO A R D W A L K BOARD W A L K BOARDWALK PLAZA GROTTO MEANDER ROAD DE C K HWY 55 CO U R T Y A R D NOTE: REFER TO CIVIL FOR SITE PLAN. BOARD W A L K TR A S H \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1" 40'-0" A000 SIT E P L A N 09 / 0 1 / 2 3 Co n c e p t 1" 40'-0"1 SITE PLAN No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e UP T T T NO P A R K I N G NO P A R K I N G NO P A R K I N G NO P A R K I N G EV EV EV EV EV EV98996 99 9 13 8 779101112 9 13 1418 UP UP LOADING DOCK 4,160 SF BASEMENT 1,230 SF KITCHEN310 SF COOLER 100 SF FREEZER 3,550 SF CONSERVATORY BASEMENT 160 SF STAIR NOTE: REFER TO CIVIL FOR SITE PLAN. 120 SF ELEVATOR 4,390 SF BALLROOM BASEMENT 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 130102030405 A C D E F G H B AA J 260 SF LAUNDRY 60 SF T.R. 60 SF T.R. 60 SF T.R. 360 SF MECH UTILITY EDGE OF BOARDWALK ABOVE. 170 SF FOUNTAIN UTILITY 220 SF ELECTRIC UTILITY TRASHLAUNDRY TLVENT DATA CENTER DATA CENTER STORAGE 320 SF TRASH EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ EQ HOOD TRASH 19 ' - 9 " 59 ' - 1 " 21 ' - 7 " 9' - 9"39' - 4"10' - 5"10' - 0"5' - 10"8' - 1"8' - 1"8' - 1"6' - 4"12' - 8"18' - 1"21' - 0"47' - 9"13' - 0" 12 ' - 9 " 11 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 1 1 " 10 ' - 1 1 " 13 ' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 11 ' - 2 " 0' - 1 1 " 6' - 6 " 14 ' - 2 " 36' - 2" 9' - 9 " 1/8" 1'-0"1 BASEMENT \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A100 VE N U E B A S E M E N T F L O O R P L A N 09 / 0 1 / 2 3 Co n c e p t No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e DN DN DN T T T NO P A R K I N G NO P A R K I N G NO P A R K I N G NO P A R K I N G EV EV EV EV EV EV98996 99 9 13 8 779101112 9 13 1418 UP UP 1,230 SF KITCHEN 240 SF MENS 240 SF WOMENS 120 SF COATS 120 SF ELEVATOR 230 SF ELEV LOBBY 300 SF ENTRY 70 S F RE C E P T I O N 190 SF STAIR 200 SF STAIR 170 SF COATS 340 SF ENTRY 70 S F RE C E P T I O N 370 SF HALL 1,010 SF LOUNGE 340 SF UNISEX 320 SF SUITE 340 SF SUITE 3,710 SF CONSERVATORY 4,630 SF BALLROOM 3,080 SF BALLROOM PLAZA 830 SF BOARDWALK 1,390 SF GROTTO 130 SF HALL110 SF HALL 280 SF HALL 970 SF COURTYARD 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 130102030405 A C D E F G H B AA J TL LAUNDRY TRASH VENT 320 SF TRASH OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW HOOD 49' - 8"9' - 10"9' - 11"5' - 10"24' - 3"5' - 11"13' - 1"7' - 9"11' - 2"80' - 5" 9' - 9"7' - 0"18' - 0"17' - 7"16' - 2"10' - 6"7' - 3" 12 ' - 2 " 8' - 6 " 12 ' - 1 " 10 ' - 9 " 11 ' - 4 " 21 ' - 1 1 " 11 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 9 " 60 ' - 0 " 78 ' - 1 0 " \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A101 VE N U E M A I N L E V E L F L O O R P L A N 04 / 0 3 / 2 3 Co n c e p t No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e 1/8" 1'-0"1 GROUND DN DN DNUPUP DNDN 480 SF ROOM 3 330 SF ROOM 4 760 SF ROOM 2 500 SF ROOM 5 460 SF ROOM 7 490 SF ROOM 9 780 SF ROOM 1 340 SF ROOM 6 630 SF ROOM 8 440 SF HALLWAY 190 SF STAIR 120 SF ELEVATOR 200 SF STAIR 06 07 08 09 10 11 1205 A C D E F G H B AA J TL LAUNDRY TRASH ICE VEND. VENT 16 ' - 9 " 9' - 1 1 " 8' - 1 " 9' - 9 " 27 ' - 1 0 " 8' - 11"3' - 8"14' - 4"5' - 11"8' - 1"6' - 5"8' - 1"5' - 11"7' - 2"7' - 8"10' - 1" 12' - 7"14' - 4"5' - 5"8' - 7"6' - 2"8' - 4"13' - 1"9' - 3"8' - 0" 1,030 SF SUITE 1 730 SF SUITE 2 770 SF ROOM 3 120 SF ELEVATOR 430 SF HALL 420 SF ROOM 4 200 SF STAIR 190 SF STAIR ROOF ROOF 06 07 08 09 10 11 1205 TL LAUNDRY TRASH ICEVEND.VEND.VENT 580 SF BALCONY 2 640 SF BALCONY 1 9' - 11"7' - 6"14' - 0"22' - 7"5' - 0"7' - 8"10' - 1" 10 ' - 1 0 " 8' - 8 " 8' - 3 " 9' - 8 " 4' - 2 " 15 ' - 7 " 13 ' - 9 " 9' - 11"7' - 6"14' - 0"5' - 11"8' - 7"13' - 1"17' - 9" 43' - 10"48' - 4" 1/8" 1'-0"1 LODGING LEVEL 1 1/8" 1'-0"2 LODING LEVEL2 \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A102 LO D G I N G L E V E L 1 & 2 F L O O R P L A N S 09 / 0 1 / 2 3 Co n c e p t No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e RETAIL 3,380 SF RETAIL 2,870 SF RETAIL 4,760 SF RESTAURANT TRASH TRASH PLAZA DROP OFF RETAIL \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A103 CO M M E R C I A L F L O O R P L A N S 04 / 0 3 / 2 3 Co n c e p t 1/8" 1'-0"1 RETAIL FLOOR PLAN No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e NOTE: REFER TO CIVIL FOR SITE PLAN. DN DN UP UP DN UP UP GARAGE KITCHEN BED BATH BED ENTRYDININGHALL DECK CLOSET HALLWAY ROOF TERRACE DECK BELOW MASTER BATH BATH BED CLOSET CLOSET BED LIVING CLOSET BATH PATIO EARTH \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/4" 1'-0" A104 DU P L E X F L O O R P L A N S 12 / 2 2 / 2 2 ME D I N A T O W N H O M E S 1/4" 1'-0"2 MAIN LEVEL 1/4" 1'-0"3 UPPER LEVEL 1/4" 1'-0"1 BASEMENT BASEMENT CLOSET 50 SF BASEMENT BATH 52 SF BASEMENT BED 143 SF BASEMENT LIVING 527 SF 772 SF MAIN LEVEL CLOSET 38 SF MAIN LEVEL HALL 66 SF MAIN LEVEL BATH 78 SF MAIN LEVEL ENTRY 94 SF MAIN LEVEL KITCHEN 124 SF MAIN LEVEL BED 153 SF MAIN LEVEL BED 244 SF MAIN LEVEL DINING 358 SF 1,156 SF ROOM SCHEDULE Level Name Area UPPER LEVEL CLOSET 42 SF UPPER LEVEL BATH 69 SF UPPER LEVEL HALLWAY 74 SF UPPER LEVEL CLOSET 88 SF UPPER LEVEL BATH 149 SF UPPER LEVEL BED 242 SF UPPER LEVEL MASTER 348 SF 1,013 SF No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e GROUND 0' - 0" LEVEL 225' - 6" LODGING ROOF37' - 6" LEVEL 1 14' - 0" VERT. GAP WD. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. BRICK MTL. PLANTERS BASEMENT -10' - 4" MTL. BALLROOM ROOF22' - 0" GROUND0' - 0" LEVEL 2 25' - 6" LODGING ROOF37' - 6" LEVEL 114' - 0" WATER FEATURE & PLANTINGS MTL. BRICK TILE BASEMENT-10' - 4" MTL. GROUND 0' - 0" LEVEL 225' - 6" LODGING ROOF 37' - 6" LEVEL 114' - 0" TILE BRICK TILE MTL. STONE VERT. GAP WD. VERT BOARD FORMED CONC. MTL. MTL. BALLROOM ROOF22' - 0" GROUND0' - 0" LEVEL 2 25' - 6" LODGING ROOF37' - 6" LEVEL 114' - 0" VERT. GAP WD. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. PLANTERS BRICK TILE MTL. BASEMENT-10' - 4" MTL. MTL. TILE STONE BALLROOM ROOF22' - 0" 1' - 0 " 10 ' - 5 " 1' - 5 " 8' - 0 " 1' - 0 " \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A200 VE N U E E L E V A T I O N S 09 / 0 1 / 2 3 Co n c e p t WEST SOUTH EAST NORTH No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e 1/8" 1'-0" TRASH ENCLOSURE EAST ROOF14' - 0" ROOF 17' - 0"CONC.VERT. WD. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. CORTEN STL.HORIZ. WD.VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. CORTEN STL. HORIZ. WD.METAL ROOF17' - 0"ROOF16' - 0" HORIZ. WD. CORTEN STL. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC.HORIZ. WD. CORTEN STL. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. VERT. WD.CONC. METAL HORIZ. WD. METAL ROOF29' - 0" VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC. HORZ. WD.METAL ROOF HORZ. WD. CONC.CONC. VERT. WD. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC.MTL. CORTEN STL. VERT. BOARD FORMED CONC.MTL. HORIZ. WD. \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/8" 1'-0" A201 RE T A I L E L E V A T I O N S 09 / 0 1 / 2 3 Co n c e p t RESTAURANT SOUTH RETAIL NORTH DAYCARE SOUTH DAYCARE EAST No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e 1/8" 1'-0" (NORTH IS SAME BUT MIRRORED) RETAIL SOUTH RESTAURANT NORTH RETAIL WEST RETAIL EAST RESTAURANT WEST RESTAURANT EAST DAYCARE WEST MAIN LEVEL10' - 0" UPPER LEVEL21' - 6" ROOF31' - 6" VERT. GAP WD. HORIZ. WD.HORIZ. WD. MAIN LEVEL10' - 0" UPPER LEVEL 21' - 6" ROOF31' - 6" VERT. GAP WD. MTL. VERT. GAP WD. \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/4" 1'-0" A202 DU P L E X E L E V A T I O N S 01 / 3 1 / 2 3 ME D I N A T O W N H O M E S No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e EAST WESTSOUTH MAIN LEVEL 0' - 0" SOFFIT 20' - 0" T.O. ROOF 32' - 0" \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale: 1/4" 1'-0" A204 DU P L E X E L E V A T I O N S H I P - R O O F 03 / 2 8 / 2 3 Pr o j e c t S t a t u s No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e EAST 1' - 0 " 12 ' - 0 " 3' - 6 " 8' - 0 " 25' - 0"25' - 0" 15 ' - 3 " W24X68 3' - 0" BO A R D W A L K PERIMITER LIGHTING ON SOLAR ILLUMINATES PARKING SPOTS UNDER CANOPY. UNDERGROUND CONDUIT FOR SOLAR 1,295 SOLAR PANELS \//\ VILLAMIL ARCHITECTURE Plo t S t a m p : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N Architect Pablo Villamil (612) 388-6622 PabloV@VillamilArchitecture.com Owner Chris Pederson Medina Ventures LLC MadMrChristopher@gmail.com General Contractor Kalcon LLC (612) 244-1141 KalconLLC.com Scale:As indicated A300 SO L A R A R R A Y 09 / 0 1 / 2 3 Co n c e p t No . De s c r i p t i o n Da t e 2 SOLAR ARRAY PERSPECTIVE 1/8" 1'-0"3 SOLAR ARRAY STRUCTURE 1" 20'-0"1 SITE PLAN SOLAR 1 CITY OF MEDINA 1 PLANNING COMMISSION 2 DRAFT Meeting Minutes 3 Tuesday September 12, 2023 4 5 1. Call to Order: Chairperson Rhem called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 6 7 Present: Planning Commissioners Adeel Ahmed, John Jacob, Beth Nielsen, and Braden 8 Rhem. 9 10 Absent: Planning Commissioner Justin Popp, Matt Plec, and Cindy Piper. 11 12 Also Present: City Planning Director Dusty Finke and City Planner Deb Dion. 13 14 2. Changes to Agenda 15 16 No comments made. 17 18 3. Update from City Council Proceedings 19 20 Finke provided updates on recent City Council actions. He also provided details on ash trees 21 and the funding available to assist with surveying and implementation plans. He noted that 22 the Park Commission will review the results of the pickleball noise study at its September 23 meeting and a recommendation will be forwarded to the Council for review at its first 24 meeting in October. 25 26 4. Representative at Next City Council Meeting 27 28 Finke advised that the Council will be meeting the following Tuesday and Rhem volunteered 29 to attend in representation of the Commission. 30 31 5. Planning Department Report 32 33 Finke provided an update. 34 35 6. Public Hearing – Ordinance Amendment – Chapter 6 of the City Code 36 Prohibiting the Sale of Edible Cannabinoid Products 37 38 Finke provided background on the hemp derived edibles and beverages which were legalized 39 in 2022, noting that the Council adopted a moratorium prohibiting the sale of those items in 40 November of 2022 which will expire in November of 2023. He stated that this summer the 41 legislature legalized adult use cannabis, with licenses for sale to be handled through the state 42 and anticipated to begin in January of 2025. He stated that state statute does allow a 43 moratorium to prohibit the sale of adult use cannabis products until the state begins licensing 44 of sales. He noted that the hemp derived products are regulated differently until the time the 45 state begins its licensing. He explained that the City needs to determine how it would 46 regulate the sale of lower potency hemp derived products until the state handles that 47 regulation. He stated that the City Council discussed this and would like to prohibit the sale 48 of these lower dose products as well. He stated that liquor stores do sell intoxicating products 49 and theoretically those businesses could be allowed to sell this type of product. 50 51 2 Rhem asked if there would be an opportunity in 2025 to have land use regulation that would 52 determine the placement for these types of businesses. 53 54 Finke confirmed that the City would have the ability to enact land use regulations, if the City 55 chose to do so, similar to establishments that sell alcohol. 56 57 Jacob asked if businesses allowed to sell the lower dose hemp products today would be 58 grandfathered in when state licensing becomes available. 59 60 Finke noted that the City regulations would become irrelevant once the state licensing 61 regulations begin. He stated that, as proposed, this ordinance would prohibit all businesses 62 from selling the low dose hemp derived products. 63 64 Jacob asked if internet sales would be allowed, using the scenario that someone were to sell 65 those products from their home. 66 67 Finke believed that would not be allowed under this ordinance. He stated that home 68 occupation regulations would apply to a home-based business. 69 70 Rhem opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. 71 72 No comments. 73 74 Rhem closed the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. 75 76 Rhem commented that the ordinance as proposed makes sense as it would allow time for the 77 state regulations to be developed. 78 79 Jacob agreed. 80 81 Nielsen commented that she could go either way and kind of liked the idea about allowing 82 sales at the liquor stores. 83 84 Motion by Nielsen, seconded by Jacob, to recommend approval of the ordinance 85 amendment prohibiting the sale of edible cannabinoid products as proposed. Motion carries 86 unanimously. (Absent: Piper, Plec, and Popp) 87 88 7. Public Hearing – Ordinance Amendment – Chapter 8 of the City Code Related to Tree 89 Preservation 90 91 Rhem noted that this is a continuation of the public hearing from the last meeting. 92 93 Finke stated that the draft resolution includes the changes as discussed at the last meeting and 94 provided a brief summary of those changes. He stated that the ordinance as proposed also 95 adjusts the replacement ratios for Uptown Hamel and provided a summary as well as 96 additional options that could be considered for that area. He stated that there was additional 97 discussion related to less desirable trees and reviewed proposed regulation on how those trees 98 could be addressed within the ordinance. He also provided examples used by other 99 communities. 100 101 Rhem commented that the layers of complexity would seem to go against the intent to 102 simplify the ordinance. He commented that as drafted it would seem relatively burdensome. 103 3 He acknowledged that it would make sense to incentivize removal of diseased trees, or low 104 value trees, rather than high value trees, but the process seems burdensome. 105 106 Finke stated that the survey would already be completed, and the intent would be to require 107 that information to be provided on an electronic spreadsheet to make calculations and 108 changes easier. He noted that staff is already doing the work on the fly without these guides. 109 110 Jacob noted that ultimately you need to consider what you want the lot to look like in terms 111 of the canopy. 112 113 Finke noted that the City avoids the situation of overplanting and in those situations where 114 trees would not be viable if replanted in the required numbers through payment to the 115 reforestation fund. 116 117 Ahmed used the Meander Boardwalk site as an example and asked how this would apply to a 118 certain area. 119 120 Finke replied that area is not being purchased and therefore would not be touched as part of 121 that project. He commented that in that type of scenario where trees are out of the way, 122 removal of those trees would be more likely to be avoided as a result of the regulations. 123 124 Rhem commented that he is comfortable with the changes but asked if it could be simplified, 125 although he did not have a suggestion on how that could be done. 126 127 Nielsen commented that while she does not disagree, staff is in charge of enacting these 128 regulations and therefore feels comfortable if staff is proposing that type of calculation. She 129 liked the idea of requiring the electronic spreadsheet. 130 131 Finke asked and received confirmation that the Commission supports the language as 132 presented related to ash and elm trees. 133 134 Rhem asked the type of impact that would have on the reforestation fund, as that fund could 135 be used to mitigate ash trees. 136 137 Nielsen asked if staff is comfortable with the language as drafted, as staff would be 138 implementing the regulations. 139 140 Finke stated that in terms of implementing, he is not concerned. He stated that idea of the 141 impact on the reforestation fund is a good point as that would be a significant reduction. He 142 recognized that while the payment into the fund for a large diseased tree is helpful, there 143 should also be consideration that the tree would ultimately need to come down at some time 144 in the future at a cost as well. 145 146 Rhem noted that the Council could have additional discussions about the impact to the 147 reforestation fund. 148 149 Motion by Nielsen, seconded by Rhem, to recommend approval with the additional 150 requirement that the tree survey be submitted as an electronic spreadsheet. Motion carries 151 unanimously. (Absent: Piper, Plec, and Popp) 152 153 Rhem closed the public hearing at 8:04 p.m. 154 155 8. Approval of the August 8, 2023 Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. 156 4 157 Motion by Jacob, seconded by Nielsen, to approve the August 8, 2023, Planning 158 Commission minutes with noted changes. Motion carries unanimously. (Absent: Piper, Plec, 159 and Popp) 160 161 9. Adjourn 162 163 Motion by Nielsen, seconded by Ahmed, to adjourn the meeting at 8:08 p.m. Motion 164 carried unanimously. 165